The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
WaPo: Hillary Was Right: Only Solution Is to Stop White Women from Falling in Love with White Men
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the Washington Post:

Like it or not, studies suggest that Clinton may not be wrong on white women voting like their husbands

The Fix Analysis

By Eugene Scott March 13 at 10:40 AM

According to Hillary Clinton, many white women voted against her because the men in their lives told them to. During a discussion at the India Today Conclave on Saturday, Clinton was asked why she thought most white women voted for Trump, even after the “Access Hollywood” tape and claims of sexual misconduct weeks before the election.

“[Democrats] do not do well with white men, and we don’t do well with married, white women. And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should,” she said. …

But there are studies that show that how white women vote, especially those who are married, is highly influenced by the politics of their husbands.

Oregon State University assistant professor Kelsy Kretschmer co-wrote a study examining women’s voting patterns. “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology,” she told the Guardian last year.

In the study published in Political Research Quarterly, Kretschmer and her co-authors wrote: “Women consistently earn less money and hold less power, which fosters women’s economic dependency on men. Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.”

This and other studies also show that other factors influence why white women vote for conservative politicians. White women are much more likely to be married than women of other demographic groups. And married women are more likely to support traditional values, both culturally and economically.

A study from the Institute for Social and Economic Research reported that wives in general vote in ways that support their husband’s economic interests. And most men voted for Trump in 2016 with many citing his economic policies as a major factor as to why.

And Julie Kohler, who holds a Ph.D. in family social science, wrote that a vote for the Republican party is often deemed as the most logical one for married women — especially when factoring in race and faith.

“Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior, through the explicit ideologies they propagate and the more insidious ways they reflect and perpetuate other structural inequalities,” the senior vice president for the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donor network wrote in the Nation.

But economics also play a huge factor, something Clinton and others criticizing pro-Trump women’s votes don’t often acknowledge.

“The gender pay gap, for example, has the practical effect of privileging men’s careers—particularly white men’s—over women’s and yoking white women’s economic interests to their husbands’. So for some married white women, a vote for the Republican candidate may appear to be the self-interested choice,” Kohler added.

The Democrats are the party of personal unhappiness.

As I wrote in 2013:

Happy White Married People Vote Republican, So Why Doesn’t The GOP Work On Making White People Happy?

 
• Tags: Too Many White People 
Hide 177 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. So, if you are at the ballot box and she votes and you look up, you see:

    She voted Democrat

    … a powerful, woke, independent, strong, of color, unmarried, eminently-altruistic woman who cares about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Republican

    …powerless, enslaved, dependent-on-men, no-own-opinion-holding, only self-interested, possibly married and interested-in-her-family woman who doesn’t care about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Libertarian/Green

    …a faceless blank slate.

    Got it!

    • Replies: @rogue-one
    @El Dato

    >She voted for Trump

    She got brainwashed by Russian trolls.

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @El Dato

    One can easily take advantage of this cutting-edge research in the opposite direction too.

    Example: Hard-left-wing dyke neighbor puts out yard sign. Vote against whatever name appears on the sign.

    It works better for local politics.

  2. demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you’re dead

    • LOL: NickG, Kylie, AndrewR
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @tyrone

    Studies show that WP and NYT writers phone up their (friends) when they need studies to show something. These friends have advanced degrees and teach at colleges and perform (or at least refer to) studies which show the stuff that studies show.

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @tyrone

    Excellent thinking, Tyrone!

    The Demoncrat master executive committee could really use a guy like you.

    , @Clyde
    @tyrone


    demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you’re dead
     
    The Democrats have a lock on the dead.
  3. >The Democrats are the party of personal unhappiness.

    The Republican establishment are the party of Chamber of Commerce.

  4. @El Dato
    So, if you are at the ballot box and she votes and you look up, you see:

    She voted Democrat

    ... a powerful, woke, independent, strong, of color, unmarried, eminently-altruistic woman who cares about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Republican

    ...powerless, enslaved, dependent-on-men, no-own-opinion-holding, only self-interested, possibly married and interested-in-her-family woman who doesn't care about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Libertarian/Green

    ...a faceless blank slate.

    Got it!

    Replies: @rogue-one, @Achmed E. Newman

    >She voted for Trump

    She got brainwashed by Russian trolls.

  5. Why do women play guitar less than men?

    • Replies: @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    , @Captain Tripps
    @Foreign Expert


    Why do women play guitar less than men?
     
    Because they're intimidated by the cute babes that can...

    https://youtu.be/yLv19yZN6DY

    https://youtu.be/2sky1tt8vLA
  6. Amazing. They can’t even conceive of the possibility that married white women actually have different preferences from single white women – that when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state, then it is actually completely rational for them to vote for the party that wants them to keep their resources instead of redistributing them to single moms and third-world invaders.

    I suppose it’s a good thing that progressives continue to get more deranged and deluded, as it will further alienate them from the white voters they so despise.

    • Replies: @Silva
    @Michael S

    "when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state"

    I agree with Sailer and you in general, but I'd think that, of women whose primary breadwinner isn't the husband [or the father], for most it's themselves, not the state (and moreso when considering only white women).

    Which is related to one thing these idiots miss: if women, by changing their life choices or just getting handed same-pay for work-but-not-quite-the-same, started earning exactly as much as men, they'd ... have the exactly same incentive to vote for whoever they thought would lower their taxes (or cease giving their money to money-sink people).

    Replies: @ia

    , @Barnard
    @Michael S

    Another reason is that many of them have sons who grow up to be white men amd they want to see those sons have success in life instead of being treated like second class citizens by the government.

    , @ken
    @Michael S

    Not only do married white women differ from non-married, but generally speaking 40-50% of non-married white women are just non-liberals. The hard left just can't comprehend this.

  7. “Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior, through the explicit ideologies they propagate and the more insidious ways they reflect and perpetuate other structural inequalities,” the senior vice president for the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donor network wrote in the Nation.

    The opposite of white supremacy seems to be white genocide in practice. The constant push to marginalize white people both demographically and culturally seems to me, as a white guy, to be insidious if we are going to use that word. A level playing field would be a start but heck, if we could be supreme that sounds pretty awesome to me.

    In China they have more than yellow supremacy, they have Chinese supremacy. In SSA, South Africa is proving that they have black supremacy. In the Arab countries there is no doubt as to who is supreme. And our fellow whites in Israel seem to be supremer than anyone else within their borders. So when it comes to supremacy – I want some of those gibsmedats!

    White women as a whole may not exactly be Golda Meir when it comes to political strategy but maybe, just maybe the fate of their sons, brothers, son-in-laws, nephews and indeed, their husbands might have some weight in their calculus.

    • Replies: @Silva
    @Anonym

    About black South Africans, don't forget they're quite willing to act supremely towards foreign blacks too. I wonder, too, about how much the different black South African peoples hate each other - though that pressure will be reduced for now as they kill the whites.

    , @Rosie
    @Anonym

    "White women as a whole may not exactly be Golda Meir when it comes to political strategy but maybe, just maybe the fate of their sons, brothers, son-in-laws, nephews and indeed, their husbands might have some weight in their calculus."

    No kidding. The knuckle-draggers hatred of women is so profound, they think we're fine watching our desperate, unemployed sons kill themselves with opiates because they have nothing else to do. If anyone's unduly influencing White women's voting choices, it's not White husbands, it's Daddy Professor. They're just mad the higher ed guilt trips didn't work as they had hoped. Although college-educated women voted for Hillary, it wasn't sufficiently lop-sided to compensate for the massive Trump vote among White working-class women.

  8. Anonymous [AKA "Bigsky"] says:

    It wouldn’t be because men and women with the same values and political views tend to marry or anything. These types of propaganda articles are so moronic, insulting and demeaning but yet it’s a woman in Idaho who is supposedly so stupid she can’t think or vote for herself.

    I have news for the urbanites reading the fantasy news, you are not very smart, you’re incredibly the ignorant and offensive, yes you snowflake.

    I recommend families in the red centre states have as many children as possible that will really send the lunatic left into meltdown.

    Walt

    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous


    It wouldn’t be because men and women with the same values and political views tend to marry or anything.
     
    This. The WaPo is wielding Occam's Butterknife with its usual dexterity.

    Have any of these studies broken out women with children as well? It would be interesting to compare the four groups of women divided by un/married and with/out children.
    , @Buffalo Joe
    @Anonymous

    Bigsky, your first sentence says it all and liberals marry liberals because who else would?

  9. But wasn’t Jimmy Durante a Racist?

  10. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I think that, although they don’t want to put it this way, the researchers are saying that women have evolved to tend to support (not all, statistical distribution, and all that) things that support the family unit, allowing her, in this case, the option to stay home and raise children.

    This doesn’t seem like a wrong analysis. You get to vote for one of two people. You have no line-item veto for the qualities of either of them that you dislike. Who do you vote for? You vote for the one whose overall policies would tend to support an environment where your family can thrive and where you can fill the role in the family that you prefer. Maybe you want to work, but you don’t want to absolutely have to work full time at a job you choose not for fulfillment but for the greatest paycheck. You want your husband to do that.

    Trump may have groped some women? How does that effect you? It doesn’t. You’re not working in the White House. Trump probably realizes his groping days are over anyway. Maybe you’d even be willing to get groped if it helped your family. Do you let peripheral issues like that affect your vote, or do you keep your eyes on the prize?

    The latter, and these women vote for Trump.

    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    @Anonymous

    IOW, Republican voting women have their crap together. Democrat women don't.

  11. “Happy White Married People Vote Republican, So Why Doesn’t The GOP Work On Making White People Happy?”

    Because we cost more than brown people, and the US CoC hates how much we cost, so we must go.

    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    @The Alarmist

    For the corporate Repubs and their paymasters, cheap labor is the Holy Grail.

  12. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    And then they came for the female contemporary art museum curator?

    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-moca-fires-molesworth-vergne-20180313-story.html

    I have no idea what this is about.

    An email sent to MOCA trustees Monday afternoon and obtained by The Times announced that Molesworth “is stepping down” from the high-profile post, among the most coveted of its kind nationally, effective immediately. The implication was that Molesworth had resigned.

    “No,” artist and board member Catherine Opie said by phone when asked about the email wording. “He fired her.”

    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated for “undermining the museum.” Opie was nonplussed.

    Oh. Diversity and inclusion?

    Last month the museum was embarrassed by the mishandling of plans for the 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum’s three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.

    The gala was quietly shelved on Friday, according to a museum insider not authorized to discuss the matter, with $1.4 million in pledges set to be returned to donors. The dust-up reflected a similar distinction between Vergne’s high-profile exhibitions for two white male artists and Molesworth’s for an African American male artist and a Latin American female artist.

    • Replies: @peterike
    @Anonymous


    The 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum’s three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.
     
    Maybe Grotjahn understood, deep down, that he is just another purveyor of garbage art, and felt embarrassed at being honored.

    http://www.artfronts.com/images/MoMA-FN/MoMA-Mark%20Grotjhan/Mark%20Grotjahn-09.jpg

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Anonymous


    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated ...
     
    Hey, Ope, how 'bout a quick game of dieversity whack-a-molesworth? Nah, Paw, Aunt Bea's takin' me to the drug store for an ice cream soda. Sorry, but where do these people get names like this?
    , @ia
    @Anonymous

    It's about a white, male modern artist sick and tired of being pushed around by feminists, blacks and latinos. You've just been handed something good on a silver platter. But, being white, conservative guys you're bobbling it.

  13. • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Anonymous

    Who is worse: Hillary, or the people who think she is a good person and would be a good leader?

    Replies: @Twodees Partain

  14. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    More from Hillary in India:

    … I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are …

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    I hope Hillary said in India:

    "And is Trump REALLY a billionaire?"

    , @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Yet again, Hillary proves that she is the most breathtakingly cynical politician in American history, which is really saying something.

    Replies: @Bard of Bumperstickers

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Anonymous

    Then she fell down, twice, on a flight of stone steps. Karma?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5493679/Hillary-Clinton-slips-twice-stairs-trip-India.html

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    , @Annatar
    @Anonymous

    Clinton is simply lying here, the 30 states that Trump carried have a 180 million people in them and 53% of the nation's economic output vs the 20 states that Clinton carried that have 140 million people and 47% of the nation's economic output. Furthermore, Trump won 7 of the 10 fastest growing states in terms of population.

    Replies: @anon

    , @Altai
    @Anonymous

    It'd odd that Hilary and the blue ticks all started to sound like MovieBob in the last few weeks. (Never underestimate snobbery and class hatred, science has yet to discover why MovieBob tweets the way he does.)

    And at no point will anyone be allowed to ask if places with wealth attract immigrants rather than immigrants creating wealth. (Nobody leaves their home behind and say 'I'm gunna work harder than I needed to at home to make less!')

    , @Moses
    @Anonymous

    The 2016 election put a stake through her heart, but Hillary is still stumbling around out there like an zombie, mumbling and blaming. Like a clinging, bad odor.

    "Is Hillary running in 2020? She is if she's breathing!" So said Dick Morris, the pol handler who knows the Clintons as well as anyone.

    I believe it.

    , @Barnard
    @Anonymous

    Are there any reports as to how the Indians reacted to Hillary's speech? These people practiced the caste system for centuries and in some ways still do. I don't think a speech promoting the idea that if you want your group to come out on top, you are a backwards looking hick would be red meat for Indian elites. Indian society doesn't seem real keen on practicing diversity and inclusion locally.

    , @Daniel Chieh
    @Anonymous

    Hillary should try to campaign to be the Prime Minister of India. That would be quite entertaining.

    Replies: @Singh, @al gore rhythms

    , @anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Hillary talking about the 2016 election---in India. India!!! Hillary being Hillary again. I wonder how many of the "bhistis" really care.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    , @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Like him or not, he's her president and she shouldn't be attacking him in front of foreigners. (Imagine the uproar if McCain or Kerry had attacked Obama on their foreign trips.)

    , @Obsessive Contrarian
    @Anonymous

    "I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP. "

    God in heaven, what a bullshit statistic. It's not even worth disproving.

    Can she be any more disgusting than we thought she was? But she should keep talking. It's bad for the Democrats.

    Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson

    , @istevefan
    @Anonymous


    I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP.
     
    But she lost among her own demographic. Hillary is a white female white and that demographic gave 53% of their support to her opponent. And white males gave even more support to her opponent. In other words her own demographic group REJECTED her.

    Deep down Hillary must realize this. I wonder what that feels like.

    Replies: @Ivy

    , @El Dato
    @Anonymous

    This video will be declared Faux News and having been generated by generative adversarial neural networks within weeks..

  15. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    I hope Hillary said in India:

    “And is Trump REALLY a billionaire?”

  16. “Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.”

    There was a woman arguing with Tucker Carlson last night that characterized this as married white women being bullied into voting in their husband’s economic interest, as if that is different than their own economic interest.

    Seems like a stupid collective effort to shame white women into voting against their husband’s economic interest.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @william munny

    It seems also like a continuation of years of effort to destroy the family. THE STATE does not like competition.

    Kretschmer says:


    Women consistently earn less money and hold less power, which fosters women’s economic dependency on men.
     
    See, that's called "the family". How stupid does the PhD make you, anyway?
  17. @Foreign Expert
    Why do women play guitar less than men?

    Replies: @Doug, @Captain Tripps

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn’t going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Doug

    "Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years."

    It certainly hasn't worked for Charlie Daniels, so you're probably right.

    Replies: @Reactionary Utopian

    , @Paleo Liberal
    @Doug

    Something interesting -- in tribal societies, it is/was forbidden for women to drum.

    Men could drum and chant, women danced. Sometimes men could dance as well, but women would NEVER drum and chant.

    Try going to a pow-wow sometime. You will never see a woman drumming.

    I don't know what it is about women and drums, but it seems to go against hundreds of thousands of years of society.

    Replies: @anon

    , @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @Doug


    Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBjPAqmnvGA

    Replies: @Brutusale

    , @al gore rhythms
    @Doug

    " A guitar isn’t going to help pick up guys"

    So does that mean that there aren't many gay guitarists?

    I suppose there is a stereotype of Lesbian folk musicians, so your contention might work from that side.

    , @Rosie
    @Doug

    Women have always loved musicians, so why do many right-wing men insist that women actually prefer uncivilized brutes? Even castrati had groupies. Oh, excuse me, I meant band-aids. They were sought out as considerate lovers with exceptional endurance. (No, most women aren't masochists who wish to be raped.)

    https://thesmartset.com/article0806070116/

    , @Steve in Greensboro
    @Doug

    Doug’s iron rule of the violin: “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years”.

    Like any iron rule, there are exceptions including Don “Sugarcane” Harris, David LaFlamme, Jean-Luc Ponty and Papa John Creech.

    David LaFlamme of “It’s a Beautiful Day Playing his homage to Don “Sugarcane” Harris in his “Don and Dewey”.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoz4aNwIB5w

    Plus Jean-Luc Ponty with Frank doing his “Cosmik Debris”.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp6LT2MdaPI

    And finally Papa John Creech with Hot Tuna

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6kIJnZu4IU

    But I still acknowledge the validity of the Doug’s general rule.

  18. It is amazing how left-wing groups so often end up embodying the nastiest stereotypes of yesteryear.

    Take the feminists. Have there ever been a more self-absorbed, shrewish, harridan-like bunch who seem to be motivated by nothing more than making everyone as sourly miserable as they are?

    There are fellow travellers of course. Those who see the women in misery and feel protective of them and the very weak-willed lovely hearted who get dragged along for the ride, but basically feminists are a 1920s stereotype of what happens when a woman goes entirely and completely wrong.

    Democrats are the party of a sort of numbed misery wherein your actual relationships and those around you are, at best, seen as antagonistic so the government or media or other distant and impersonal organisation can mediate.

    Atomisation leads to people voting Democrat and Democrat policies lead to further atomisation. Republicans should work in the opposite direction.

  19. OT:

    In case people are wondering why Rick Saccone lost.

    >Rick Saccone Asked Mother of Addict What She Would Cut to Fund Opioid Addiction Treatment

    “After telling her about his wife’s dental implants, he asked this woman where she would cut funding to put money into drug treatment. He told her, “We’re going to try to cut the budget, alright? So where do I take it from? Do I take it from education? Do I take it from Alzheimer’s? Do I take it from autistic children? You say you want more funding. Where would you think I should take it from, in those budget line items?” He then paused as if to wait for an answer. I can only imagine how that mother felt.”

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2018/03/05/rick-saccone-mother-addict-cut-fund-opioid-addiction/#IoeTPuHHH9UB6tMc.99

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    @rogue-one

    Saccone is a fat baby boomer slob who ran away from the immigration issue. Saccone is a kept whore for the GOP CHEAP LABOR FACTION.

    https://twitter.com/i_aver/status/973800668283723778

    , @anonomy
    @rogue-one

    I'd cut funds from the Military Industrial Complex and bring the troops home. Then I'd cut from the overseas bribe money that is lavished on our friends. Then I'd stop the endless open door on immigration and move to have the church money used to help American drug addicts and homeless rather than for "refugees". Education can be cut too considering they contribute to the rise of opiate abuse because most young adults can't figure out their gender. The UN can be cut as well as a host of other entities less deserving than my own countryman.
    I have always voted republican when I used to vote and I'm a white woman. I also did not vote for Hillary's stinking husband and I could never stand her.
    Republicans should understand that you can't just stop helping people who have been on public assistance for so long, but moving in millions from other countries is not helping those Americans, veterans included who should be helped but lose out in favor of legal and illegal immigrants, and that is wrong.

    , @Berty
    @rogue-one

    Rust Belt voters like Trump and don't like the GOP. If "typical GOP guy" was enough to win than we'd have President Jeb right now.

    I'm hoping they figure that out in time for the special in OH in August.

    , @Sarah Toga
    @rogue-one

    Since Saccone fit so nicely with "The Stupid Party", does that imply that at least he is not evil?

  20. @tyrone
    demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you're dead

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Achmed E. Newman, @Clyde

    Studies show that WP and NYT writers phone up their (friends) when they need studies to show something. These friends have advanced degrees and teach at colleges and perform (or at least refer to) studies which show the stuff that studies show.

  21. I think this piece touches on some truth but spins it in the most unfavorably way to people who don’t vote for the left. In short, the Democrats have a huge percentage of their base people who feel insecure, which includes a lot of single women (as Steve says, the party of personal unhappiness). The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.

    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters (same applies for mass immigration, as it disrupts societal cohesion, or instilling voters with a sense of tribal loyalty to their race, gender, orientations, etc.).

    People who openly state that the left wants to destroy our culture are often ridiculed, but the fact is that the Democrats benefit from disrupting our traditional culture and they know that. Their full-throated lionization of career women (often single) and ‘undocumented Americans’ is the proof.

    • Replies: @27 year old
    @Arclight


    The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.
     
    Seems to me like GOP are trying to preserve an order that doesn't really exist.

    What is the personal security level of the Boers right now?

    Things are ordered here exactly like they are in SA.

    Replies: @SimpleSong

    , @Daniel Chieh
    @Arclight

    Spandrell's bioleninism in action.

    , @istevefan
    @Arclight


    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters
     
    Apparently they only need to undermine our traditional institutions among WHITE voters to ensure electoral success. Do married, successful black families not vote democrat? Do married, successful latinos not vote democrat? And what about Jews, the most highly educated, successful group in the nation? By all means they should be GOP voters, but they are not.

    It seems only the white vote is adversely affected by the cultural rot. The nonwhite groups seem pretty uniform in their voting, whether they are dysfunctional or affluent. Thus explains the democrats overwhelming desire to bring in more nonwhites.

    The GOP's task is doubly hard. First they have to maintain a certain white percentage in the nation, or they have no chance to win. But outside of Trump, none of them have the guts to try it.

    Second, even with enough whites in the nation, they must enact policies to limit dysfunction among the whites, else they will lose those whites to the democrats. But outside of Trump, none of them seem interested in doing this.
  22. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Yet again, Hillary proves that she is the most breathtakingly cynical politician in American history, which is really saying something.

    • Replies: @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Anonymous

    That would make her the most political politician, too.

    "A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground." - H. L. Mencken

    All amoral, self-aggrandizing, narcissistic pragmatism and no soul.

  23. @Michael S
    Amazing. They can't even conceive of the possibility that married white women actually have different preferences from single white women - that when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state, then it is actually completely rational for them to vote for the party that wants them to keep their resources instead of redistributing them to single moms and third-world invaders.

    I suppose it's a good thing that progressives continue to get more deranged and deluded, as it will further alienate them from the white voters they so despise.

    Replies: @Silva, @Barnard, @ken

    “when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state”

    I agree with Sailer and you in general, but I’d think that, of women whose primary breadwinner isn’t the husband [or the father], for most it’s themselves, not the state (and moreso when considering only white women).

    Which is related to one thing these idiots miss: if women, by changing their life choices or just getting handed same-pay for work-but-not-quite-the-same, started earning exactly as much as men, they’d … have the exactly same incentive to vote for whoever they thought would lower their taxes (or cease giving their money to money-sink people).

    • Replies: @ia
    @Silva

    Not if they lose affirmative action quotas, disadvantaged government quotas, Title IX privileges, and divorce rape laws, they sure as hell aren't going to vote for lower taxes. Liberal, single, urban women want a lot of cops around, blacks hate the police. That's the wedge.

    Replies: @Rosie

  24. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Then she fell down, twice, on a flight of stone steps. Karma?
     
    Probably. They practically invented that shit over there. Didn't they?

    Culture Club singing Karma Chameleon:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmcA9LIIXWw

    Did they ever figure out what was the deal with this guy, BLTGQWERTY? I don't have time to look all this stuff up.
  25. @Anonym
    “Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior, through the explicit ideologies they propagate and the more insidious ways they reflect and perpetuate other structural inequalities,” the senior vice president for the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donor network wrote in the Nation.

    The opposite of white supremacy seems to be white genocide in practice. The constant push to marginalize white people both demographically and culturally seems to me, as a white guy, to be insidious if we are going to use that word. A level playing field would be a start but heck, if we could be supreme that sounds pretty awesome to me.

    In China they have more than yellow supremacy, they have Chinese supremacy. In SSA, South Africa is proving that they have black supremacy. In the Arab countries there is no doubt as to who is supreme. And our fellow whites in Israel seem to be supremer than anyone else within their borders. So when it comes to supremacy - I want some of those gibsmedats!

    White women as a whole may not exactly be Golda Meir when it comes to political strategy but maybe, just maybe the fate of their sons, brothers, son-in-laws, nephews and indeed, their husbands might have some weight in their calculus.

    Replies: @Silva, @Rosie

    About black South Africans, don’t forget they’re quite willing to act supremely towards foreign blacks too. I wonder, too, about how much the different black South African peoples hate each other – though that pressure will be reduced for now as they kill the whites.

  26. This and other studies also show that other factors influence why white women vote for conservative politicians.

    The nerve! Don’t they know that ONLY Democrats are good for women? And that all women have the same problems? Can’t they think for themselves and vote like we tell them to?!?

  27. This is why I encourage my white female students to only date Men of Color

    The only reason white girls vote the wrong way is to protect their white husbands and kids

    If they don’t have white husbands and kids and instead had Husbands and Children of Color then they would vote for positive candidates

    Demographic change will fix things but it take some time

    • Replies: @fish
    @Tiny Duck

    Ohs Tinys.....teh oly stoodints you’n gots be in yo hed!


    Ledsperb “deliberin teh cylinder o Justus to Tinys” pitzjackson

    , @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Tiny Duck

    Ducky must be a post-menopausal woman: she no longer has periods. };^D

    Just kiddin', kid: your sense of parody is unwavering.

    , @Giant Duck
    @Tiny Duck

    Who do you encourage your white male students to date?

    Replies: @Tiny Duck

    , @ia
    @Tiny Duck

    Tiny Duck, has it ever occurred to you that you may at some future date be found out and brought to justice?

    Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson

  28. @Michael S
    Amazing. They can't even conceive of the possibility that married white women actually have different preferences from single white women - that when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state, then it is actually completely rational for them to vote for the party that wants them to keep their resources instead of redistributing them to single moms and third-world invaders.

    I suppose it's a good thing that progressives continue to get more deranged and deluded, as it will further alienate them from the white voters they so despise.

    Replies: @Silva, @Barnard, @ken

    Another reason is that many of them have sons who grow up to be white men amd they want to see those sons have success in life instead of being treated like second class citizens by the government.

  29. @Arclight
    I think this piece touches on some truth but spins it in the most unfavorably way to people who don't vote for the left. In short, the Democrats have a huge percentage of their base people who feel insecure, which includes a lot of single women (as Steve says, the party of personal unhappiness). The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.

    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters (same applies for mass immigration, as it disrupts societal cohesion, or instilling voters with a sense of tribal loyalty to their race, gender, orientations, etc.).

    People who openly state that the left wants to destroy our culture are often ridiculed, but the fact is that the Democrats benefit from disrupting our traditional culture and they know that. Their full-throated lionization of career women (often single) and 'undocumented Americans' is the proof.

    Replies: @27 year old, @Daniel Chieh, @istevefan

    The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.

    Seems to me like GOP are trying to preserve an order that doesn’t really exist.

    What is the personal security level of the Boers right now?

    Things are ordered here exactly like they are in SA.

    • Replies: @SimpleSong
    @27 year old

    Sorry to say you are right. I am not very well versed in the classics but even I can see that we are now living through what was recognized as described by Plato (and others) as the natural and inevitable end-state of democracy.

    I see you are a young man; sorry that this is your lot. Le deluge.

  30. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Clinton is simply lying here, the 30 states that Trump carried have a 180 million people in them and 53% of the nation’s economic output vs the 20 states that Clinton carried that have 140 million people and 47% of the nation’s economic output. Furthermore, Trump won 7 of the 10 fastest growing states in terms of population.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Annatar

    Amazing. Where is Snopes? I trust you. Should I?

    Replies: @anon

  31. @tyrone
    demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you're dead

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Achmed E. Newman, @Clyde

    Excellent thinking, Tyrone!

    The Demoncrat master executive committee could really use a guy like you.

  32. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    It’d odd that Hilary and the blue ticks all started to sound like MovieBob in the last few weeks. (Never underestimate snobbery and class hatred, science has yet to discover why MovieBob tweets the way he does.)

    And at no point will anyone be allowed to ask if places with wealth attract immigrants rather than immigrants creating wealth. (Nobody leaves their home behind and say ‘I’m gunna work harder than I needed to at home to make less!’)

  33. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    @ Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior,

    EXACTLY! which is why gender ideology must destroy the family. Let there be NO intermediate private groups (church, private school, natural family) between the modern consuming peasant and the State. The patria potestas is already being wrested from parents, as the Alfie Evans case and others attest.

  34. “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology”

    LOL. They should tell that to my ex-wife. We had our political differences, and I was well aware of them but mostly (to my detriment) indifferent to them. She wasn’t very political in terms of actually, you know, paying attention to political news. I doubt she could have even named the governor and US senators at the time. For me expressing a political opinion was a throwaway line, knowing she probably wouldn’t share my position. For her it was the beginning of a three hour argument over shit that had absolutely nothing to do with our marriage – a marriage which barely lasted more than a year, thank God. Wish I could have that year back.

    My wife now is conservative like me. She’s more conservative than she was before we were married, but it’s not as if I turned her from a hardcore leftist into a Trump voter. Her move to the right is more about being exposed (through me) to views she probably would not have given much consideration to (because the press mocks them) if we had never met. It isn’t pressure that causes married white women to become more so conservative. It’s more like those studies that show that your more likely to support gay rights if you know someone who is gay. She also knows who our state and federal representatives are, and I can even disagree about something and feel safe knowing it will turn into a polite, interesting discussion, not an all day, one-sided screaming match.

    A single guy in my office was telling me that the latest craze among women on internet dating sites is to write “don’t select me if you voted for Trump.” While I think this is incredibly small-minded, it also happens to be a huge timesaver…for the men. It’s useful to know before even wasting your time with a woman that she’s judgmental, stupid, and narrow-minded.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @JollyOldSoul


    A single guy in my office was telling me that the latest craze among women on internet dating sites is to write “don’t select me if you voted for Trump.”
     
    Very true.

    While I think this is incredibly small-minded, it also happens to be a huge timesaver…for the men. It’s useful to know before even wasting your time with a woman that she’s judgmental, stupid, and narrow-minded.
     
    Even more truer.
    , @Joe Stalin
    @JollyOldSoul

    Hmm, sounds like movie plots!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hef39RzemJE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D3XbDry-ds

  35. @El Dato
    So, if you are at the ballot box and she votes and you look up, you see:

    She voted Democrat

    ... a powerful, woke, independent, strong, of color, unmarried, eminently-altruistic woman who cares about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Republican

    ...powerless, enslaved, dependent-on-men, no-own-opinion-holding, only self-interested, possibly married and interested-in-her-family woman who doesn't care about sexual predators in Hollywood.

    She voted Libertarian/Green

    ...a faceless blank slate.

    Got it!

    Replies: @rogue-one, @Achmed E. Newman

    One can easily take advantage of this cutting-edge research in the opposite direction too.

    Example: Hard-left-wing dyke neighbor puts out yard sign. Vote against whatever name appears on the sign.

    It works better for local politics.

  36. @william munny
    "Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.”

    There was a woman arguing with Tucker Carlson last night that characterized this as married white women being bullied into voting in their husband's economic interest, as if that is different than their own economic interest.

    Seems like a stupid collective effort to shame white women into voting against their husband's economic interest.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    It seems also like a continuation of years of effort to destroy the family. THE STATE does not like competition.

    Kretschmer says:

    Women consistently earn less money and hold less power, which fosters women’s economic dependency on men.

    See, that’s called “the family”. How stupid does the PhD make you, anyway?

  37. “You don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are”

    I thought that when one ethnic group did better than another that it was proof of racism, sexism, and oppression? Oh, I guess not when it’s Indians or Jews doing better than whites, or women doing better than men.

  38. @Foreign Expert
    Why do women play guitar less than men?

    Replies: @Doug, @Captain Tripps

    Why do women play guitar less than men?

    Because they’re intimidated by the cute babes that can…

  39. @Anonymous
    I think that, although they don't want to put it this way, the researchers are saying that women have evolved to tend to support (not all, statistical distribution, and all that) things that support the family unit, allowing her, in this case, the option to stay home and raise children.

    This doesn't seem like a wrong analysis. You get to vote for one of two people. You have no line-item veto for the qualities of either of them that you dislike. Who do you vote for? You vote for the one whose overall policies would tend to support an environment where your family can thrive and where you can fill the role in the family that you prefer. Maybe you want to work, but you don't want to absolutely have to work full time at a job you choose not for fulfillment but for the greatest paycheck. You want your husband to do that.

    Trump may have groped some women? How does that effect you? It doesn't. You're not working in the White House. Trump probably realizes his groping days are over anyway. Maybe you'd even be willing to get groped if it helped your family. Do you let peripheral issues like that affect your vote, or do you keep your eyes on the prize?

    The latter, and these women vote for Trump.

    Replies: @stillCARealist

    IOW, Republican voting women have their crap together. Democrat women don’t.

  40. Julie Kohler, who holds a Ph.D. in family social science…

    F this gay earth. 🙁 So let’s break this down.

    family – nope
    social – nope
    science – nope

    She is the opposite of everything she claims to be. Not only does society not need her, but she is actively destroying society while posing as an expert, out of pure spite.

    She should go to Idaho and live as an organic potato farmer for 20 years to get right with God. But we all know that’s not going to happen. If she had the wherewithal to do that, she never would have become a family bulls*** faggot in the first place.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @grapesoda


    She should go to Idaho and live as an organic potato farmer for 20 years to get right with God.
     
    As much as I think the Chinese Cult-Rev-1.0 was one long sick-ass ordeal, they got a few things right. However, it'd have been pigs instead of potatoes, dumplings instead of deer meat, a tent instead of a Kazynski Kabin, and God doesn't cover Manchuria.

    "Pigs, pot stickers, pup tents.", Chinaman Dwaot-ze Xiarute of State-controlled Enterprise Dunder-Manchurian Paper Cooperative.
  41. @Anonymous
    And then they came for the female contemporary art museum curator?

    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-moca-fires-molesworth-vergne-20180313-story.html

    I have no idea what this is about.


    An email sent to MOCA trustees Monday afternoon and obtained by The Times announced that Molesworth "is stepping down" from the high-profile post, among the most coveted of its kind nationally, effective immediately. The implication was that Molesworth had resigned.

    "No," artist and board member Catherine Opie said by phone when asked about the email wording. "He fired her."

    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated for "undermining the museum." Opie was nonplussed.
     

    Oh. Diversity and inclusion?

    Last month the museum was embarrassed by the mishandling of plans for the 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum's three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.

    The gala was quietly shelved on Friday, according to a museum insider not authorized to discuss the matter, with $1.4 million in pledges set to be returned to donors. The dust-up reflected a similar distinction between Vergne's high-profile exhibitions for two white male artists and Molesworth's for an African American male artist and a Latin American female artist.
     

    Replies: @peterike, @Achmed E. Newman, @ia

    The 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum’s three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.

    Maybe Grotjahn understood, deep down, that he is just another purveyor of garbage art, and felt embarrassed at being honored.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @peterike

    Hey, WT?? I swear that's ... he stole his whole theme from a painting that I saw at my kid's preschool by a kid named Connor! The last I saw of it, the 4 year-olds teacher had put it in his cubby ....

    Unbe-frickin-lievable! If I were the donors, yeah, I'd want my 1.4 million back.

  42. “Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.”

    Hilary is living proof of this. Look how supportive she was of her cheating, lying, raping, harassing, politician husband throughout the 90’s. She has stayed faithful to the party and people that created and elected him.

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
  43. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    The 2016 election put a stake through her heart, but Hillary is still stumbling around out there like an zombie, mumbling and blaming. Like a clinging, bad odor.

    “Is Hillary running in 2020? She is if she’s breathing!” So said Dick Morris, the pol handler who knows the Clintons as well as anyone.

    I believe it.

  44. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Are there any reports as to how the Indians reacted to Hillary’s speech? These people practiced the caste system for centuries and in some ways still do. I don’t think a speech promoting the idea that if you want your group to come out on top, you are a backwards looking hick would be red meat for Indian elites. Indian society doesn’t seem real keen on practicing diversity and inclusion locally.

  45. @Anonym
    “Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior, through the explicit ideologies they propagate and the more insidious ways they reflect and perpetuate other structural inequalities,” the senior vice president for the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donor network wrote in the Nation.

    The opposite of white supremacy seems to be white genocide in practice. The constant push to marginalize white people both demographically and culturally seems to me, as a white guy, to be insidious if we are going to use that word. A level playing field would be a start but heck, if we could be supreme that sounds pretty awesome to me.

    In China they have more than yellow supremacy, they have Chinese supremacy. In SSA, South Africa is proving that they have black supremacy. In the Arab countries there is no doubt as to who is supreme. And our fellow whites in Israel seem to be supremer than anyone else within their borders. So when it comes to supremacy - I want some of those gibsmedats!

    White women as a whole may not exactly be Golda Meir when it comes to political strategy but maybe, just maybe the fate of their sons, brothers, son-in-laws, nephews and indeed, their husbands might have some weight in their calculus.

    Replies: @Silva, @Rosie

    “White women as a whole may not exactly be Golda Meir when it comes to political strategy but maybe, just maybe the fate of their sons, brothers, son-in-laws, nephews and indeed, their husbands might have some weight in their calculus.”

    No kidding. The knuckle-draggers hatred of women is so profound, they think we’re fine watching our desperate, unemployed sons kill themselves with opiates because they have nothing else to do. If anyone’s unduly influencing White women’s voting choices, it’s not White husbands, it’s Daddy Professor. They’re just mad the higher ed guilt trips didn’t work as they had hoped. Although college-educated women voted for Hillary, it wasn’t sufficiently lop-sided to compensate for the massive Trump vote among White working-class women.

  46. @rogue-one
    OT:

    In case people are wondering why Rick Saccone lost.

    >Rick Saccone Asked Mother of Addict What She Would Cut to Fund Opioid Addiction Treatment

    "After telling her about his wife’s dental implants, he asked this woman where she would cut funding to put money into drug treatment. He told her, “We’re going to try to cut the budget, alright? So where do I take it from? Do I take it from education? Do I take it from Alzheimer’s? Do I take it from autistic children? You say you want more funding. Where would you think I should take it from, in those budget line items?” He then paused as if to wait for an answer. I can only imagine how that mother felt."

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2018/03/05/rick-saccone-mother-addict-cut-fund-opioid-addiction/#IoeTPuHHH9UB6tMc.99

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @anonomy, @Berty, @Sarah Toga

    Saccone is a fat baby boomer slob who ran away from the immigration issue. Saccone is a kept whore for the GOP CHEAP LABOR FACTION.

  47. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.”

    It certainly hasn’t worked for Charlie Daniels, so you’re probably right.

    • Replies: @Reactionary Utopian
    @Twodees Partain


    “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.”

    It certainly hasn’t worked for Charlie Daniels, so you’re probably right.
     

    Well, what Charlie Daniels does, he does with a violin, but he fiddles, which is a whole different art. I play the violin, but I don't fiddle. A whole different thing, that is. Fiddling is more difficult in some ways, easier in others ... but entirely different.

    As for never getting anyone laid in a hundred years, the original commenter obviously doesn't play the violin (nor, probably, does he fiddle). I now testify that playing the violin got me laid, or at least didn't set the project back any, within the last three years. I played a solo arrangement of "Over the Rainbow." I played it high; I played it sweet. She got all misty-eyed. And before much longer, she got all naked, and busy. I doubt if it even matters what instrument. Play it reasonably well, play something sentimental, and play it for her, and I think it'll strengthen your case considerably.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Rosie

  48. @rogue-one
    OT:

    In case people are wondering why Rick Saccone lost.

    >Rick Saccone Asked Mother of Addict What She Would Cut to Fund Opioid Addiction Treatment

    "After telling her about his wife’s dental implants, he asked this woman where she would cut funding to put money into drug treatment. He told her, “We’re going to try to cut the budget, alright? So where do I take it from? Do I take it from education? Do I take it from Alzheimer’s? Do I take it from autistic children? You say you want more funding. Where would you think I should take it from, in those budget line items?” He then paused as if to wait for an answer. I can only imagine how that mother felt."

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2018/03/05/rick-saccone-mother-addict-cut-fund-opioid-addiction/#IoeTPuHHH9UB6tMc.99

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @anonomy, @Berty, @Sarah Toga

    I’d cut funds from the Military Industrial Complex and bring the troops home. Then I’d cut from the overseas bribe money that is lavished on our friends. Then I’d stop the endless open door on immigration and move to have the church money used to help American drug addicts and homeless rather than for “refugees”. Education can be cut too considering they contribute to the rise of opiate abuse because most young adults can’t figure out their gender. The UN can be cut as well as a host of other entities less deserving than my own countryman.
    I have always voted republican when I used to vote and I’m a white woman. I also did not vote for Hillary’s stinking husband and I could never stand her.
    Republicans should understand that you can’t just stop helping people who have been on public assistance for so long, but moving in millions from other countries is not helping those Americans, veterans included who should be helped but lose out in favor of legal and illegal immigrants, and that is wrong.

  49. It must be a truth Hillary stumbled across.

  50. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Hillary should try to campaign to be the Prime Minister of India. That would be quite entertaining.

    • Replies: @Singh
    @Daniel Chieh

    https://storify.com/Kal_Chiron/anti-india-and-anti-hindu-record-of-clintons

    , @al gore rhythms
    @Daniel Chieh

    Maybe she could borrow some of the fancy dress costumes in Justin Trudeau's playbox?

  51. @rogue-one
    OT:

    In case people are wondering why Rick Saccone lost.

    >Rick Saccone Asked Mother of Addict What She Would Cut to Fund Opioid Addiction Treatment

    "After telling her about his wife’s dental implants, he asked this woman where she would cut funding to put money into drug treatment. He told her, “We’re going to try to cut the budget, alright? So where do I take it from? Do I take it from education? Do I take it from Alzheimer’s? Do I take it from autistic children? You say you want more funding. Where would you think I should take it from, in those budget line items?” He then paused as if to wait for an answer. I can only imagine how that mother felt."

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2018/03/05/rick-saccone-mother-addict-cut-fund-opioid-addiction/#IoeTPuHHH9UB6tMc.99

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @anonomy, @Berty, @Sarah Toga

    Rust Belt voters like Trump and don’t like the GOP. If “typical GOP guy” was enough to win than we’d have President Jeb right now.

    I’m hoping they figure that out in time for the special in OH in August.

  52. @Arclight
    I think this piece touches on some truth but spins it in the most unfavorably way to people who don't vote for the left. In short, the Democrats have a huge percentage of their base people who feel insecure, which includes a lot of single women (as Steve says, the party of personal unhappiness). The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.

    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters (same applies for mass immigration, as it disrupts societal cohesion, or instilling voters with a sense of tribal loyalty to their race, gender, orientations, etc.).

    People who openly state that the left wants to destroy our culture are often ridiculed, but the fact is that the Democrats benefit from disrupting our traditional culture and they know that. Their full-throated lionization of career women (often single) and 'undocumented Americans' is the proof.

    Replies: @27 year old, @Daniel Chieh, @istevefan

    Spandrell’s bioleninism in action.

  53. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.”

    Gee, ya think? Takes a Phd to figure that one out. These people act like women are some sort of space aliens, a totally different species. In fact they happen to have fathers, brothers, sons, male relatives and grow up in the same households. The single women whose vote is somewhat different from their married counterparts are also probably mostly on the younger side. Younger people are more naive and fall for the razzmatazz of SJW ideologies especially since that’s heavily pushed by the education system.

    “Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior,

    Here we have some insight into the thinking of these extremists. That’s why they’ve been battering away at the very institution of marriage itself along with religion and any notions of having an identity (it’s a social construct). Good thing their champion Clinton lost; we were at a real crossroad then.

  54. Wouldn’t the economic interests of a wife’s be the same as the husband’s?

  55. The DNC have successfully alienated most European American men. I hope they can also alienate more European American women.

  56. @27 year old
    @Arclight


    The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.
     
    Seems to me like GOP are trying to preserve an order that doesn't really exist.

    What is the personal security level of the Boers right now?

    Things are ordered here exactly like they are in SA.

    Replies: @SimpleSong

    Sorry to say you are right. I am not very well versed in the classics but even I can see that we are now living through what was recognized as described by Plato (and others) as the natural and inevitable end-state of democracy.

    I see you are a young man; sorry that this is your lot. Le deluge.

  57. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    Something interesting — in tribal societies, it is/was forbidden for women to drum.

    Men could drum and chant, women danced. Sometimes men could dance as well, but women would NEVER drum and chant.

    Try going to a pow-wow sometime. You will never see a woman drumming.

    I don’t know what it is about women and drums, but it seems to go against hundreds of thousands of years of society.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Paleo Liberal

    As a drummer I can tell you - only THE MAN can handle the stick.

  58. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Hillary talking about the 2016 election—in India. India!!! Hillary being Hillary again. I wonder how many of the “bhistis” really care.

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @anonymous

    No one really cares what Hillary has to say. It's all meaningless boilerplate. As has often been noted, she couldn't fill a high school auditorium during the campaign. Now if she would talk openly and honestly about all the shenanigans she's been involved in, I'd be on the edge of my seat.

  59. istevefan says:

    But there are studies that show that how white women vote, especially those who are married, is highly influenced by the politics of their husbands.

    Are there studies that show how black women vote? Are there studies that show how Jewish women vote? Once again they seem miffed at the thought that 53% of white women (somewhat higher among married ones) would vote against them. To democrats anything worse than a 50-50 split is downright unfair, unless of course, it is in their favor.

    I’ve noticed that every article about the white vote tilting towards the GOP implies something is wrong with the white voters who go against the democrats. Either they are racist retrogrades, in the case of white men, or they are frightened wives who are somewhat coerced by said retrogrades into voting for the GOP.

    But articles that discuss the nonwhite vote, of which a supermajority votes democrat, never point out any flaws in the highly skewed voting patterns of those voters. Instead the GOP is blamed for being too white and for not doing enough to reach out.

    So white voters are at fault for not supporting the democrats, while the GOP is at fault for nonwhite voters supporting the democrats.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @istevefan

    "To democrats anything worse than a 50-50 split is downright unfair, unless of course, it is in their favor."

    It's not just democrats. It's also establishment Republicans, who are embarrassed that Whites vote for them, and the MSM of course. They want Whites to split their vote down the middle so that minorities get to run the country, with Whites effectively disenfranchising each other.

  60. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    • Replies: @Brutusale
    @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    A college roommate, a violinist, used to busk on the MBTA station platforms. His fiddle got him more ass than Charmin.

  61. Isn’t it logical that Conservative women are more likely to marry Conservative men? Um, duh.

  62. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    Like him or not, he’s her president and she shouldn’t be attacking him in front of foreigners. (Imagine the uproar if McCain or Kerry had attacked Obama on their foreign trips.)

  63. Yet Saccone lost to a Pelosi Democrat.

    Most White women under 40 iirc are unmarried are they not?

    And absent the sunk cost of a husband vote Dem. Moreover high rate of Divorce favors Dems.

    Trump has been a disaster enabling Feinstein gun grabs so when it Reginald Denny time we can’t even fight back and enraging the pussy hats. They are no longer sitting at home thinking it’s in the bag.

    Yeah married White women vote their husbands but White women are on a marriage and baby strike. Fundamentally they demand more dominance and swagger than their White male peers possess. No policy will fix that short of global war where every surviving White guy is a killer and there is zero female employment and welfare as everything goes into military spending

    • Replies: @Berty
    @Whiskey

    I wonder about Whiskey sometimes.

    Given the extreme length of time he's been on Steve's blogs (twelve years at least by my measure) he's probably an elderly man. His repetition and lack of sentence structure attest to this as well. Also given that every post he makes is about women or mentions women he is either divorced or never married. Because he's old he obviously isn't going to get any now and that likely embitters him greatly. Old and alone, his iSteve posts are the only discernible mark he can make on the world.

    Overall, his posts are a fascinating look into his world.

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Achmed E. Newman

  64. Some Democrats have noticed that perpetually insulting half of the electorate is bad for business.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-14/democrats-cringe-hillary-declares-blue-states-are-more-economically-advanced

    Do you suppose that some Democrats would like to silence Jimmy Kimmel?

    • Replies: @Bernardista
    @WorkingClass


    Some Democrats have noticed that perpetually insulting half of the electorate is bad for business..
     
    Because that half of the electorate is the one that actually goes out and votes.

    Do you suppose that some Democrats would like to silence Jimmy Kimmel?
     
    Tip of the iceberg, my friend. They would also have to put a gag order on 90% of white elitist celebrities who can't seem to get through a monologue without the obligatory dig at white males.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  65. @Anonymous
    It wouldn't be because men and women with the same values and political views tend to marry or anything. These types of propaganda articles are so moronic, insulting and demeaning but yet it's a woman in Idaho who is supposedly so stupid she can't think or vote for herself.

    I have news for the urbanites reading the fantasy news, you are not very smart, you're incredibly the ignorant and offensive, yes you snowflake.

    I recommend families in the red centre states have as many children as possible that will really send the lunatic left into meltdown.

    Walt

    Replies: @res, @Buffalo Joe

    It wouldn’t be because men and women with the same values and political views tend to marry or anything.

    This. The WaPo is wielding Occam’s Butterknife with its usual dexterity.

    Have any of these studies broken out women with children as well? It would be interesting to compare the four groups of women divided by un/married and with/out children.

  66. @istevefan

    But there are studies that show that how white women vote, especially those who are married, is highly influenced by the politics of their husbands.
     
    Are there studies that show how black women vote? Are there studies that show how Jewish women vote? Once again they seem miffed at the thought that 53% of white women (somewhat higher among married ones) would vote against them. To democrats anything worse than a 50-50 split is downright unfair, unless of course, it is in their favor.

    I've noticed that every article about the white vote tilting towards the GOP implies something is wrong with the white voters who go against the democrats. Either they are racist retrogrades, in the case of white men, or they are frightened wives who are somewhat coerced by said retrogrades into voting for the GOP.

    But articles that discuss the nonwhite vote, of which a supermajority votes democrat, never point out any flaws in the highly skewed voting patterns of those voters. Instead the GOP is blamed for being too white and for not doing enough to reach out.

    So white voters are at fault for not supporting the democrats, while the GOP is at fault for nonwhite voters supporting the democrats.

    Replies: @Rosie

    “To democrats anything worse than a 50-50 split is downright unfair, unless of course, it is in their favor.”

    It’s not just democrats. It’s also establishment Republicans, who are embarrassed that Whites vote for them, and the MSM of course. They want Whites to split their vote down the middle so that minorities get to run the country, with Whites effectively disenfranchising each other.

  67. @Daniel Chieh
    @Anonymous

    Hillary should try to campaign to be the Prime Minister of India. That would be quite entertaining.

    Replies: @Singh, @al gore rhythms

  68. Saying that white women vote the way their husbands do is so… sexist.

    How do we know which way the arrow of causation points?

    Meanwhile, even Thomas Friedman is getting a clue:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/opinion/trump-trade-china.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fthomas-l-friedman&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection

    “…the sudden loss of a million factory jobs in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and PA. Trump won all of those states.”

    He won Ohio by 8%, I might add.

    • Replies: @S. Anonyia
    @Obsessive Contrarian

    We don't know. Plenty of women influence their husband's choices too. My mother has made my father more conservative over time, and I have made my husband more conservative (he was apolitical until he met me).

    The only woman I know whose voting choices are strongly influenced by a man is my sister, and it's in the other direction. Her husband has her half on her way to becoming a communist.

  69. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    “I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP. ”

    God in heaven, what a bullshit statistic. It’s not even worth disproving.

    Can she be any more disgusting than we thought she was? But she should keep talking. It’s bad for the Democrats.

    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @Obsessive Contrarian


    Can she be any more disgusting than we thought she was?
     
    Well, probably not than I thought she was, but the floor for her may be the abyss.

    But she should keep talking. It’s bad for the Democrats.
     
    True.
  70. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    ” A guitar isn’t going to help pick up guys”

    So does that mean that there aren’t many gay guitarists?

    I suppose there is a stereotype of Lesbian folk musicians, so your contention might work from that side.

  71. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    Women have always loved musicians, so why do many right-wing men insist that women actually prefer uncivilized brutes? Even castrati had groupies. Oh, excuse me, I meant band-aids. They were sought out as considerate lovers with exceptional endurance. (No, most women aren’t masochists who wish to be raped.)

    https://thesmartset.com/article0806070116/

  72. @Daniel Chieh
    @Anonymous

    Hillary should try to campaign to be the Prime Minister of India. That would be quite entertaining.

    Replies: @Singh, @al gore rhythms

    Maybe she could borrow some of the fancy dress costumes in Justin Trudeau’s playbox?

  73. “In the battle of the sexes there is an awful lot of fraternization with the enemy going on” – Mark Steyn

  74. @tyrone
    demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you're dead

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Achmed E. Newman, @Clyde

    demoncrat solution: marry black man ,so what if he murders you ,you can still vote democrat even if you’re dead

    The Democrats have a lock on the dead.

  75. OT:

    Theranos CEO Holmes charged with massive fraud http://fw.to/25PkGBh

  76. “Yeah married White women vote their husbands but White women are on a marriage and baby strike.”

    Evidence?

  77. @Anonymous
    It wouldn't be because men and women with the same values and political views tend to marry or anything. These types of propaganda articles are so moronic, insulting and demeaning but yet it's a woman in Idaho who is supposedly so stupid she can't think or vote for herself.

    I have news for the urbanites reading the fantasy news, you are not very smart, you're incredibly the ignorant and offensive, yes you snowflake.

    I recommend families in the red centre states have as many children as possible that will really send the lunatic left into meltdown.

    Walt

    Replies: @res, @Buffalo Joe

    Bigsky, your first sentence says it all and liberals marry liberals because who else would?

  78. istevefan says:
    @Arclight
    I think this piece touches on some truth but spins it in the most unfavorably way to people who don't vote for the left. In short, the Democrats have a huge percentage of their base people who feel insecure, which includes a lot of single women (as Steve says, the party of personal unhappiness). The GOP on the other hand has more people that have a higher level of personal security with how things are currently ordered and want to preserve that.

    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters (same applies for mass immigration, as it disrupts societal cohesion, or instilling voters with a sense of tribal loyalty to their race, gender, orientations, etc.).

    People who openly state that the left wants to destroy our culture are often ridiculed, but the fact is that the Democrats benefit from disrupting our traditional culture and they know that. Their full-throated lionization of career women (often single) and 'undocumented Americans' is the proof.

    Replies: @27 year old, @Daniel Chieh, @istevefan

    Obviously, the implication for the Democrats is that for more electoral success they need to undermine our traditional institutions like marriage to produce more Dem-leaning voters

    Apparently they only need to undermine our traditional institutions among WHITE voters to ensure electoral success. Do married, successful black families not vote democrat? Do married, successful latinos not vote democrat? And what about Jews, the most highly educated, successful group in the nation? By all means they should be GOP voters, but they are not.

    It seems only the white vote is adversely affected by the cultural rot. The nonwhite groups seem pretty uniform in their voting, whether they are dysfunctional or affluent. Thus explains the democrats overwhelming desire to bring in more nonwhites.

    The GOP’s task is doubly hard. First they have to maintain a certain white percentage in the nation, or they have no chance to win. But outside of Trump, none of them have the guts to try it.

    Second, even with enough whites in the nation, they must enact policies to limit dysfunction among the whites, else they will lose those whites to the democrats. But outside of Trump, none of them seem interested in doing this.

  79. @Whiskey
    Yet Saccone lost to a Pelosi Democrat.

    Most White women under 40 iirc are unmarried are they not?

    And absent the sunk cost of a husband vote Dem. Moreover high rate of Divorce favors Dems.

    Trump has been a disaster enabling Feinstein gun grabs so when it Reginald Denny time we can't even fight back and enraging the pussy hats. They are no longer sitting at home thinking it's in the bag.

    Yeah married White women vote their husbands but White women are on a marriage and baby strike. Fundamentally they demand more dominance and swagger than their White male peers possess. No policy will fix that short of global war where every surviving White guy is a killer and there is zero female employment and welfare as everything goes into military spending

    Replies: @Berty

    I wonder about Whiskey sometimes.

    Given the extreme length of time he’s been on Steve’s blogs (twelve years at least by my measure) he’s probably an elderly man. His repetition and lack of sentence structure attest to this as well. Also given that every post he makes is about women or mentions women he is either divorced or never married. Because he’s old he obviously isn’t going to get any now and that likely embitters him greatly. Old and alone, his iSteve posts are the only discernible mark he can make on the world.

    Overall, his posts are a fascinating look into his world.

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Berty

    People like to insult whiskey and call him a virgin bitch or whatever.....BUT nobody ever seems to explain to me....how exactly is he wrong?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Rosie

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Berty

    I agree with Neoconned. Whiskey may be a bit over-the top sometimes, but I gotta agree with the gist of it. I have no idea how old he is, but enjoy his comments nowadays.

  80. istevefan says:
    @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP.

    But she lost among her own demographic. Hillary is a white female white and that demographic gave 53% of their support to her opponent. And white males gave even more support to her opponent. In other words her own demographic group REJECTED her.

    Deep down Hillary must realize this. I wonder what that feels like.

    • Replies: @Ivy
    @istevefan

    Agency is a foreign concept in the Clinton household. Maybe there is some academic study to pursue, so NYT and WaPo minions can gin something up.

  81. So now Hillary Rodham Clinton is offering us her expert opinion on the inner workings of other people’s marriages, huh?

    You really gotta hand it to the Lord…He has a Divine sense of humor!

  82. Executive summary:

    When blacks, browns, and single white women vote as a bloc for their common interests, they are empowered and virtuous.

    When white men and married white women vote as a bloc for their common interests, they are deplorably, irredeemably evil.

    I propose a two-state solution: One nation for white-hating people of any race, and one nation for those who love white people. And I mean actually love white people, not just love us for our generous gibsmedats.

  83. • LOL: Harry Baldwin
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Jim Don Bob

    "You wear it well ... Madam Onassis got nothing on you." ... bridge to fiddle, played by young musician who probably got laid right after the recording session.

    (Start at 1 minute in, if you don't like the slow instrumental intro.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsqKdZ3JZ2k

    Haha, great stuff by Rod - "I suppose your thinkin' 'I bet he's drinkin', or he wouldn't get in touch with me.'" Drinkin' hell, I'd have had to have imbibed 2 lines of coke, a coupla ludes, and at least two tabs of windowpane.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    , @MBlanc46
    @Jim Don Bob

    That was naughty, very naughty.

  84. @istevefan
    @Anonymous


    I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP.
     
    But she lost among her own demographic. Hillary is a white female white and that demographic gave 53% of their support to her opponent. And white males gave even more support to her opponent. In other words her own demographic group REJECTED her.

    Deep down Hillary must realize this. I wonder what that feels like.

    Replies: @Ivy

    Agency is a foreign concept in the Clinton household. Maybe there is some academic study to pursue, so NYT and WaPo minions can gin something up.

  85. @Tiny Duck
    This is why I encourage my white female students to only date Men of Color

    The only reason white girls vote the wrong way is to protect their white husbands and kids

    If they don't have white husbands and kids and instead had Husbands and Children of Color then they would vote for positive candidates

    Demographic change will fix things but it take some time

    Replies: @fish, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Giant Duck, @ia

    Ohs Tinys…..teh oly stoodints you’n gots be in yo hed!

    Ledsperb “deliberin teh cylinder o Justus to Tinys” pitzjackson

  86. @JollyOldSoul
    “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology"

    LOL. They should tell that to my ex-wife. We had our political differences, and I was well aware of them but mostly (to my detriment) indifferent to them. She wasn't very political in terms of actually, you know, paying attention to political news. I doubt she could have even named the governor and US senators at the time. For me expressing a political opinion was a throwaway line, knowing she probably wouldn't share my position. For her it was the beginning of a three hour argument over shit that had absolutely nothing to do with our marriage - a marriage which barely lasted more than a year, thank God. Wish I could have that year back.

    My wife now is conservative like me. She's more conservative than she was before we were married, but it's not as if I turned her from a hardcore leftist into a Trump voter. Her move to the right is more about being exposed (through me) to views she probably would not have given much consideration to (because the press mocks them) if we had never met. It isn't pressure that causes married white women to become more so conservative. It's more like those studies that show that your more likely to support gay rights if you know someone who is gay. She also knows who our state and federal representatives are, and I can even disagree about something and feel safe knowing it will turn into a polite, interesting discussion, not an all day, one-sided screaming match.

    A single guy in my office was telling me that the latest craze among women on internet dating sites is to write "don't select me if you voted for Trump." While I think this is incredibly small-minded, it also happens to be a huge timesaver...for the men. It's useful to know before even wasting your time with a woman that she's judgmental, stupid, and narrow-minded.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Joe Stalin

    A single guy in my office was telling me that the latest craze among women on internet dating sites is to write “don’t select me if you voted for Trump.”

    Very true.

    While I think this is incredibly small-minded, it also happens to be a huge timesaver…for the men. It’s useful to know before even wasting your time with a woman that she’s judgmental, stupid, and narrow-minded.

    Even more truer.

  87. OT from UK Daily Mail
    Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes surrenders control of the company and gives up most equity after SEC charges her with ‘elaborate, years-long…
    US securities regulators on Wednesday charged the chief executive of the blood-testing company Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes, and a former…

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    @Clyde

    Elizabeth Holmes says "the goal is to empower the individual."

    Elizabeth Holmes was running a con on greedy investors. Elizabeth Holmes repeated buzz words in an Addams Family TV show Lurch voice and the greedy slobs ate it up.

    Greedy geezers were all too eager to help give her scam some veneer of believability by taking big cash to haunt the board of Theranos. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was one of the greedy geezer rodents to take cash from Elizabeth Holmes. Mattis should be immediately fired by President Trump.

    https://twitter.com/RudyHavenstein/status/973991879627821056

    Replies: @Neoconned

    , @Tyrion 2
    @Clyde

    Proof that the wealthiest people actually believe their PC nonsense.

  88. Kretschmer & Kohler …….hmmm, Irish? Why are the Irish nearly all left-wing libtards? Hmmm?

  89. @Twodees Partain
    @Doug

    "Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years."

    It certainly hasn't worked for Charlie Daniels, so you're probably right.

    Replies: @Reactionary Utopian

    “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.”

    It certainly hasn’t worked for Charlie Daniels, so you’re probably right.

    Well, what Charlie Daniels does, he does with a violin, but he fiddles, which is a whole different art. I play the violin, but I don’t fiddle. A whole different thing, that is. Fiddling is more difficult in some ways, easier in others … but entirely different.

    As for never getting anyone laid in a hundred years, the original commenter obviously doesn’t play the violin (nor, probably, does he fiddle). I now testify that playing the violin got me laid, or at least didn’t set the project back any, within the last three years. I played a solo arrangement of “Over the Rainbow.” I played it high; I played it sweet. She got all misty-eyed. And before much longer, she got all naked, and busy. I doubt if it even matters what instrument. Play it reasonably well, play something sentimental, and play it for her, and I think it’ll strengthen your case considerably.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Ah, but have you considered the possibility that she meant to give you some whether you played the violin or displayed your prowess with a can opener while feeding her cats? Maybe she just had the hots for you despite your violining.

    Replies: @Rosie

    , @Rosie
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Check this out:

    https://mic.com/articles/104964/science-finally-explains-why-talented-musicians-are-so-damn-sexy#.RvBMNXyBM

    If you want a quality appraisal of a musical composition, ask your wife sometime during days 6-14 of her menstrual cycle. Apparently, we are especially perceptive of musical ability at peak fertility, suggesting that musicians are attractive for casual encounters. I was right. Imagine that!

    To any guy who suspects he's been cucked for Caleb Followill: Be a good sport and consider it a service to your people. Your wife has excellent taste.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnhXHvRoUd0

    Replies: @Rosie

  90. @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Yet again, Hillary proves that she is the most breathtakingly cynical politician in American history, which is really saying something.

    Replies: @Bard of Bumperstickers

    That would make her the most political politician, too.

    “A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.” – H. L. Mencken

    All amoral, self-aggrandizing, narcissistic pragmatism and no soul.

  91. @Tiny Duck
    This is why I encourage my white female students to only date Men of Color

    The only reason white girls vote the wrong way is to protect their white husbands and kids

    If they don't have white husbands and kids and instead had Husbands and Children of Color then they would vote for positive candidates

    Demographic change will fix things but it take some time

    Replies: @fish, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Giant Duck, @ia

    Ducky must be a post-menopausal woman: she no longer has periods. };^D

    Just kiddin’, kid: your sense of parody is unwavering.

  92. @Clyde
    OT from UK Daily Mail
    Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes surrenders control of the company and gives up most equity after SEC charges her with 'elaborate, years-long...
    US securities regulators on Wednesday charged the chief executive of the blood-testing company Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes, and a former...

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @Tyrion 2

    Elizabeth Holmes says “the goal is to empower the individual.”

    Elizabeth Holmes was running a con on greedy investors. Elizabeth Holmes repeated buzz words in an Addams Family TV show Lurch voice and the greedy slobs ate it up.

    Greedy geezers were all too eager to help give her scam some veneer of believability by taking big cash to haunt the board of Theranos. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was one of the greedy geezer rodents to take cash from Elizabeth Holmes. Mattis should be immediately fired by President Trump.

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Charles Pewitt

    I don't see a scam here just greedy stupid investors getting even

    Replies: @EdwardM

  93. Single women are married to their social milieu. Conformity is risk-aversion, makes more sense in the people who carry and nurture the children.

    • Agree: fish
  94. We should be examining the people who create that social milieu. Much better application of Occam’s Razor than some plates-in-the-air crap about how white women, and only white women, hate betas, and only white betas, and their preferences are an eternally leftward-moving target that Big Media is helpless to do anything but cater to it.

  95. @Michael S
    Amazing. They can't even conceive of the possibility that married white women actually have different preferences from single white women - that when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state, then it is actually completely rational for them to vote for the party that wants them to keep their resources instead of redistributing them to single moms and third-world invaders.

    I suppose it's a good thing that progressives continue to get more deranged and deluded, as it will further alienate them from the white voters they so despise.

    Replies: @Silva, @Barnard, @ken

    Not only do married white women differ from non-married, but generally speaking 40-50% of non-married white women are just non-liberals. The hard left just can’t comprehend this.

  96. “The gender pay gap, for example, has the practical effect of privileging men’s careers—particularly white men’s—over women’s and yoking white women’s economic interests to their husbands’. So for some married white women, a vote for the Republican candidate may appear to be the self-interested choice,” Kohler added.

    “Yoking white women’s economic interests to their husbands’” Translation: “we hate the idea of white people marrying, and want to put a stop to it.” Not that it really needs much translating.

    “Systemic influences like marriage and evangelical Christianity interact with white supremacy to influence white women’s political behavior, through the explicit ideologies they propagate and the more insidious ways they reflect and perpetuate other structural inequalities,” the senior vice president for the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donor network wrote in the Nation.

    Translation: “things like marriage and Christianity and unleftist thoughts and the continued existence of white people are rivals to leftist hegemony, and must be destroyed. Only then will we have total devotion to the leftist state.”

    Oregon State University assistant professor Kelsy Kretschmer co-wrote a study examining women’s voting patterns. “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology,” she told the Guardian last year.

    Reframe: you don’t get a lot of pressure. You just get more pressure than can be exerted by the TeeVee and Social Media. But the idea that the latter are pretty weak sauce, when you get right down to it, is depressing for leftist fanatics.

  97. Married women tend to have interests that play well with traditional Republican views, for a bunch of reasons Steve has been describing for years. Suburban moms with kids in the public schools are also extremely conservative in the original sense of the word–they don’t like anyone monkeying around with the schools or property values, for obvious reasons.

  98. @Clyde
    OT from UK Daily Mail
    Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes surrenders control of the company and gives up most equity after SEC charges her with 'elaborate, years-long...
    US securities regulators on Wednesday charged the chief executive of the blood-testing company Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes, and a former...

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @Tyrion 2

    Proof that the wealthiest people actually believe their PC nonsense.

  99. @Anonymous
    More from Hillary in India:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    ... I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights, you don't like women getting jobs, you don't want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are ...
     

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Annatar, @Altai, @Moses, @Barnard, @Daniel Chieh, @anonymous, @Anonymous, @Obsessive Contrarian, @istevefan, @El Dato

    This video will be declared Faux News and having been generated by generative adversarial neural networks within weeks..

  100. @Berty
    @Whiskey

    I wonder about Whiskey sometimes.

    Given the extreme length of time he's been on Steve's blogs (twelve years at least by my measure) he's probably an elderly man. His repetition and lack of sentence structure attest to this as well. Also given that every post he makes is about women or mentions women he is either divorced or never married. Because he's old he obviously isn't going to get any now and that likely embitters him greatly. Old and alone, his iSteve posts are the only discernible mark he can make on the world.

    Overall, his posts are a fascinating look into his world.

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Achmed E. Newman

    People like to insult whiskey and call him a virgin bitch or whatever…..BUT nobody ever seems to explain to me….how exactly is he wrong?

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Neoconned

    I hear Whiskey saying that the feminization of Western Civilization is a bad idea, and I agree. White men built it, and the POCs are incapable of running it. He can be a bit TOO TOO TOO dramatic for some people's taste.

    Replies: @Rosie

    , @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I have explained numerous times how and why he is wrong:

    (1) Women's voting patterns are not invariably leftist.
    (2) Women are not primarily to blame for mass immigration.
    (3) Women do not need to be dominated.
    (4) Women are not averse to marriage.

    Every single thing he says is against the weight of the evidence. Women only vote for leftist policies when they are manipulated into doing so by educational elites; the fact that they are subject to such manipulation of course disproves the idea that women only understand force. There is no evidence whatsoever that women are refusing suitable marriage partners. There is a shortage of these due to economic policies desired by male elites and their demands for cheap labor.

    I'm not saying women bear no responsibility for the plight of the West; only that they are not more at fault than men.

    Replies: @Whiskey, @Twodees Partain, @Neoconned

  101. @Tiny Duck
    This is why I encourage my white female students to only date Men of Color

    The only reason white girls vote the wrong way is to protect their white husbands and kids

    If they don't have white husbands and kids and instead had Husbands and Children of Color then they would vote for positive candidates

    Demographic change will fix things but it take some time

    Replies: @fish, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Giant Duck, @ia

    Who do you encourage your white male students to date?

    • Replies: @Tiny Duck
    @Giant Duck

    I encourage them to

    1) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    2) they need to concentrate their privileged position on giving up some of their unearned power and not to focus on romance

    Replies: @Briny Schmuck, @nebulafox, @Giant Duck

  102. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Anonymous

    Then she fell down, twice, on a flight of stone steps. Karma?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5493679/Hillary-Clinton-slips-twice-stairs-trip-India.html

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    Then she fell down, twice, on a flight of stone steps. Karma?

    Probably. They practically invented that shit over there. Didn’t they?

    Culture Club singing Karma Chameleon:

    Did they ever figure out what was the deal with this guy, BLTGQWERTY? I don’t have time to look all this stuff up.

  103. @JollyOldSoul
    “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology"

    LOL. They should tell that to my ex-wife. We had our political differences, and I was well aware of them but mostly (to my detriment) indifferent to them. She wasn't very political in terms of actually, you know, paying attention to political news. I doubt she could have even named the governor and US senators at the time. For me expressing a political opinion was a throwaway line, knowing she probably wouldn't share my position. For her it was the beginning of a three hour argument over shit that had absolutely nothing to do with our marriage - a marriage which barely lasted more than a year, thank God. Wish I could have that year back.

    My wife now is conservative like me. She's more conservative than she was before we were married, but it's not as if I turned her from a hardcore leftist into a Trump voter. Her move to the right is more about being exposed (through me) to views she probably would not have given much consideration to (because the press mocks them) if we had never met. It isn't pressure that causes married white women to become more so conservative. It's more like those studies that show that your more likely to support gay rights if you know someone who is gay. She also knows who our state and federal representatives are, and I can even disagree about something and feel safe knowing it will turn into a polite, interesting discussion, not an all day, one-sided screaming match.

    A single guy in my office was telling me that the latest craze among women on internet dating sites is to write "don't select me if you voted for Trump." While I think this is incredibly small-minded, it also happens to be a huge timesaver...for the men. It's useful to know before even wasting your time with a woman that she's judgmental, stupid, and narrow-minded.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Joe Stalin

    Hmm, sounds like movie plots!

  104. @Anonymous
    And then they came for the female contemporary art museum curator?

    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-moca-fires-molesworth-vergne-20180313-story.html

    I have no idea what this is about.


    An email sent to MOCA trustees Monday afternoon and obtained by The Times announced that Molesworth "is stepping down" from the high-profile post, among the most coveted of its kind nationally, effective immediately. The implication was that Molesworth had resigned.

    "No," artist and board member Catherine Opie said by phone when asked about the email wording. "He fired her."

    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated for "undermining the museum." Opie was nonplussed.
     

    Oh. Diversity and inclusion?

    Last month the museum was embarrassed by the mishandling of plans for the 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum's three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.

    The gala was quietly shelved on Friday, according to a museum insider not authorized to discuss the matter, with $1.4 million in pledges set to be returned to donors. The dust-up reflected a similar distinction between Vergne's high-profile exhibitions for two white male artists and Molesworth's for an African American male artist and a Latin American female artist.
     

    Replies: @peterike, @Achmed E. Newman, @ia

    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated …

    Hey, Ope, how ’bout a quick game of dieversity whack-a-molesworth? Nah, Paw, Aunt Bea’s takin’ me to the drug store for an ice cream soda. Sorry, but where do these people get names like this?

  105. They are about an inch away from overtly advocating for single parenthood.

    It’s objectively bad for children and a massive drain on government coffers — but hey, at least Hillary gets to be President!

  106. @grapesoda

    Julie Kohler, who holds a Ph.D. in family social science...
     
    F this gay earth. :( So let's break this down.

    family - nope
    social - nope
    science - nope

    She is the opposite of everything she claims to be. Not only does society not need her, but she is actively destroying society while posing as an expert, out of pure spite.

    She should go to Idaho and live as an organic potato farmer for 20 years to get right with God. But we all know that's not going to happen. If she had the wherewithal to do that, she never would have become a family bulls*** faggot in the first place.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    She should go to Idaho and live as an organic potato farmer for 20 years to get right with God.

    As much as I think the Chinese Cult-Rev-1.0 was one long sick-ass ordeal, they got a few things right. However, it’d have been pigs instead of potatoes, dumplings instead of deer meat, a tent instead of a Kazynski Kabin, and God doesn’t cover Manchuria.

    “Pigs, pot stickers, pup tents.”, Chinaman Dwaot-ze Xiarute of State-controlled Enterprise Dunder-Manchurian Paper Cooperative.

  107. @Jim Don Bob
    http://macqueen.us/hrcShower.jpg

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @MBlanc46

    “You wear it well … Madam Onassis got nothing on you.” … bridge to fiddle, played by young musician who probably got laid right after the recording session.

    (Start at 1 minute in, if you don’t like the slow instrumental intro.)

    Haha, great stuff by Rod – “I suppose your thinkin’ ‘I bet he’s drinkin’, or he wouldn’t get in touch with me.’” Drinkin’ hell, I’d have had to have imbibed 2 lines of coke, a coupla ludes, and at least two tabs of windowpane.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Dunno, Achmed. This is coyote ugly territory here.

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote%20ugly

  108. @Berty
    @Whiskey

    I wonder about Whiskey sometimes.

    Given the extreme length of time he's been on Steve's blogs (twelve years at least by my measure) he's probably an elderly man. His repetition and lack of sentence structure attest to this as well. Also given that every post he makes is about women or mentions women he is either divorced or never married. Because he's old he obviously isn't going to get any now and that likely embitters him greatly. Old and alone, his iSteve posts are the only discernible mark he can make on the world.

    Overall, his posts are a fascinating look into his world.

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Achmed E. Newman

    I agree with Neoconned. Whiskey may be a bit over-the top sometimes, but I gotta agree with the gist of it. I have no idea how old he is, but enjoy his comments nowadays.

  109. Do the right thing and repeal the 19th amendment; then the crazy ass bitches can’t vote and the shebitch can STFU about why she sucked.

    That amendment was absolutely the dumbest thing this country ever did. All because Wilson was getting shit from feminazis, so he supported the great mistake so they would STFU.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @gunner29

    Seriously, do these mouthbreathers ever back up their b.s. with actual evidence or is this really all there is?

  110. @Silva
    @Michael S

    "when the primary breadwinner in their family is their husband and not the state"

    I agree with Sailer and you in general, but I'd think that, of women whose primary breadwinner isn't the husband [or the father], for most it's themselves, not the state (and moreso when considering only white women).

    Which is related to one thing these idiots miss: if women, by changing their life choices or just getting handed same-pay for work-but-not-quite-the-same, started earning exactly as much as men, they'd ... have the exactly same incentive to vote for whoever they thought would lower their taxes (or cease giving their money to money-sink people).

    Replies: @ia

    Not if they lose affirmative action quotas, disadvantaged government quotas, Title IX privileges, and divorce rape laws, they sure as hell aren’t going to vote for lower taxes. Liberal, single, urban women want a lot of cops around, blacks hate the police. That’s the wedge.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @ia

    I don't know about that. In fact, I'm not sure how much White women really benefit from affirmative action. I suspect so many women are concentrated in pink collar professional jobs that affirmative action isn't that much of a factor. They are not actually interested in fields where affirmative action would benefit them most, i.e. STEM.

    What do you mean by Title IX privileges? Have you got a problem with women being athletes? I would think promoting women's athletics would be a good investment in the future, for the sake of health care costs if nothing else.

    And what is this "divorce rape" I keep hearing about? I suspect there are legitimate grievances in this area, but I've never seen it spelled out in detail.

    Replies: @ia

  111. @Anonymous
    And then they came for the female contemporary art museum curator?

    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-moca-fires-molesworth-vergne-20180313-story.html

    I have no idea what this is about.


    An email sent to MOCA trustees Monday afternoon and obtained by The Times announced that Molesworth "is stepping down" from the high-profile post, among the most coveted of its kind nationally, effective immediately. The implication was that Molesworth had resigned.

    "No," artist and board member Catherine Opie said by phone when asked about the email wording. "He fired her."

    Opie said she called Vergne after receiving the surprise message and was told that Molesworth had not written a letter of resignation but was terminated for "undermining the museum." Opie was nonplussed.
     

    Oh. Diversity and inclusion?

    Last month the museum was embarrassed by the mishandling of plans for the 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum's three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.

    The gala was quietly shelved on Friday, according to a museum insider not authorized to discuss the matter, with $1.4 million in pledges set to be returned to donors. The dust-up reflected a similar distinction between Vergne's high-profile exhibitions for two white male artists and Molesworth's for an African American male artist and a Latin American female artist.
     

    Replies: @peterike, @Achmed E. Newman, @ia

    It’s about a white, male modern artist sick and tired of being pushed around by feminists, blacks and latinos. You’ve just been handed something good on a silver platter. But, being white, conservative guys you’re bobbling it.

  112. Our age would have been the golden age of the eviscerating online comment. If not for the fact that comment sections are disappearing. I suppose there’s a connection there…

    • Disagree: International Jew
    • LOL: inertial
  113. Actually, a smart white woman married to a black man might understand what immigration is doing to blacks, and be tempted to vote for patriotic immigration reform.

    Conversely, in my experience, one of the strongest blue-pilling influences is that of a radical feminist on her previously not-particularly-political husband. I’ve lost two old friends that way, in the past year.

  114. @Achmed E. Newman
    @Jim Don Bob

    "You wear it well ... Madam Onassis got nothing on you." ... bridge to fiddle, played by young musician who probably got laid right after the recording session.

    (Start at 1 minute in, if you don't like the slow instrumental intro.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsqKdZ3JZ2k

    Haha, great stuff by Rod - "I suppose your thinkin' 'I bet he's drinkin', or he wouldn't get in touch with me.'" Drinkin' hell, I'd have had to have imbibed 2 lines of coke, a coupla ludes, and at least two tabs of windowpane.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    Dunno, Achmed. This is coyote ugly territory here.

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote%20ugly

  115. @Neoconned
    @Berty

    People like to insult whiskey and call him a virgin bitch or whatever.....BUT nobody ever seems to explain to me....how exactly is he wrong?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Rosie

    I hear Whiskey saying that the feminization of Western Civilization is a bad idea, and I agree. White men built it, and the POCs are incapable of running it. He can be a bit TOO TOO TOO dramatic for some people’s taste.

    • Agree: MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Jim Don Bob

    I don't think he's saying that. I think he's saying it's women's fault. Those are two different things. Elites benefit from the feminization of Western men, which allows them to import cheap labor and demand that male taxpayers subsidize it without worrying about a "xenophobic" backlash.

  116. @Doug
    @Foreign Expert

    > Why do women play guitar less than men?

    75%+ of male guitarists are doing it for the chicks. Even if unspoken, the idea is germinating in the back of their head when they first pick up the guitar. A guitar isn't going to help pick up guys, so women have much less incentive to play it.

    You see much less a gender disparity as the instrument gets nerdier. Drummers are even more male dominated than guitarists. Among the mainstream instruments, pianists have more female representation. Then you get the classical symphony instruments like flute, violin and harp. Women if anything may be overrepresented nowadays.

    In short women take up music for the love of music. Men do so to get laid. Playing the violin hasn't gotten anyone laid in 100 years.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Paleo Liberal, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @al gore rhythms, @Rosie, @Steve in Greensboro

    Doug’s iron rule of the violin: “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years”.

    Like any iron rule, there are exceptions including Don “Sugarcane” Harris, David LaFlamme, Jean-Luc Ponty and Papa John Creech.

    David LaFlamme of “It’s a Beautiful Day Playing his homage to Don “Sugarcane” Harris in his “Don and Dewey”.

    Plus Jean-Luc Ponty with Frank doing his “Cosmik Debris”.

    And finally Papa John Creech with Hot Tuna

    But I still acknowledge the validity of the Doug’s general rule.

  117. @Obsessive Contrarian
    Saying that white women vote the way their husbands do is so... sexist.

    How do we know which way the arrow of causation points?

    Meanwhile, even Thomas Friedman is getting a clue:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/opinion/trump-trade-china.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fthomas-l-friedman&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection

    "...the sudden loss of a million factory jobs in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and PA. Trump won all of those states."

    He won Ohio by 8%, I might add.

    Replies: @S. Anonyia

    We don’t know. Plenty of women influence their husband’s choices too. My mother has made my father more conservative over time, and I have made my husband more conservative (he was apolitical until he met me).

    The only woman I know whose voting choices are strongly influenced by a man is my sister, and it’s in the other direction. Her husband has her half on her way to becoming a communist.

  118. And thus this thread has dissolved into a goony whinefest about the EVIL WOMYN and how they’re ruining everything. Poor predictable iSteve.

  119. @Annatar
    @Anonymous

    Clinton is simply lying here, the 30 states that Trump carried have a 180 million people in them and 53% of the nation's economic output vs the 20 states that Clinton carried that have 140 million people and 47% of the nation's economic output. Furthermore, Trump won 7 of the 10 fastest growing states in terms of population.

    Replies: @anon

    Amazing. Where is Snopes? I trust you. Should I?

    • Replies: @anon
    @anon

    OK. Roughly she is full of s**t.
    Calif. 62% 32% 3% 100% 14.17
    D.C. 91% 4% 2% 100% 0.68
    Hawaii 62% 30% 4% 100% 0.46
    Md. 60% 34% 3% 100% 2.07
    Mass. 60% 33% 4% 100% 2.73
    N.Y. 59% 37% 2% 100% 6.32
    R.I. 54% 39% 3% 100%
    Vt. 57% 30% 7% 100%
    Conn. 55% 41% 3% 100% 1.4
    Del. 53% 42% 3% 100% 0.39
    Ill. 55% 38% 4% 100% 4.3
    Me. 48% 45% 5% 100%
    N.J. 55% 41% 2% 100% 3.11
    N.M. 48% 40% 9% 100%
    Ore. 50% 39% 5% 100% 1.24
    Wash. 53% 37% 5% 100% 2.58
    Colo. 48% 43% 5% 100% 1.74
    Minn. 46% 45% 4% 100% 1.83
    Nev. 48% 46% 3% 100% 0.79
    N.H. 47% 47% 4% 100%
    Va. 50% 44% 3% 100% 2

    46% for all Dem states greater than 1%

    Replies: @anon

  120. @Giant Duck
    @Tiny Duck

    Who do you encourage your white male students to date?

    Replies: @Tiny Duck

    I encourage them to

    1) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    2) they need to concentrate their privileged position on giving up some of their unearned power and not to focus on romance

    • Replies: @Briny Schmuck
    @Tiny Duck

    I encourage cishet white men to

    1) sterilize themselves

    or

    2) become celibate

    or

    3) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    4) die out

    Only when white men no longer produce offspring will the world be a better place. Just read Leonard Pitts.

    , @nebulafox
    @Tiny Duck

    I should know better than respond to the troll, but alas, the opportunity to be 'a throwing salt proves to override my better judgement.

    My brown-skinned, Southeast Asian girlfriend would be very unhappy with your suggestions, TD: like the overwhelming majority of women irrespective of race, she prefers to be the one getting boned by a man who isn't getting boned himself, and who generally isn't effeminate. Here, they are quite open about that. In the US, less so, but it still comes out on online dating sites good and clear. And like most women around these parts, she likes Asian men or white men, provided they aren't soyboys, better than blacks or Middle Easterners. See, we generally don't treat women like property (outside of rough bedtime play, that is), unlike many men from Africa or the Middle East, yet still act like men, unlike our SJW counterparts. It's all about getting that Aristotlean mean, you know?

    You need to be learn to be less sexist, dude. Women-especially Women of Color-are allowed to have preferences that don't line up with what you, a privileged white man, want for them. They can handle themselves around white boyfriends-sharing our food, our pool waters, our seed-without getting perverted by our intrinsic badness. How can you have doubted them?

    Now, general observations for my main comment:

    1) This is actually deeply patronizing against women, when you think Hillary's thought down to its logical conclusion. Even some of the WaPo commentators are calling her out on that, for what it is worth. It really showcases just how *bad* of a politician she is. Trump should do everything in his power to keep her prominent: it hurts the Democrats, big time.

    2) Mass importation of East and South Asians is a very strange way of trying to combat racism against black people or Central Americans, as anybody who has lived over here would be happy to tell you. The open borders advocates are simultaneously making whites more racially conscious while importing vast amounts of people from societies far less touched by political correctness and possessing no sense of obligation to historically ill-treated minorities in the US. How this will end well for them, it is hard to say. Another problem lies in the fact that Central American campesinos carry their own attitudes about racial hierarchies with them across the border: and hint, hint, they want lighter skinned partners, both the men and the women.

    3) Ironically enough, I suspect brave new "diverse" America is going to prove to be far more stratified socioeconomically according to race than America circa around the last three decades of the 21st Century were. Ironically enough, the Reagan years were probably the closest we got to a relatively socioeconomically race-blind society, things like the crack epidemic and inner cities going from bad to intolerable aside: after the CR Movement and related changes, but before crony-capitalism and mass immigration/free trade really began to take off and destroy the fragile foundations of it all. Though many blacks remained deprived and massively poor, it was substantially less than previous decades, and this was before emigration from Africa proper became a thing, allowing high-octane Nigerian immigrant kids (ironically, probably the descendants of those who sold the slaves) to be claimed as AA quota students by elite colleges rather than having to deal with native blacks.

    Even the NYT was willing to admit this:

    https://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/10/us/study-finds-gains-for-black-middle-class.html

    This highly racially-based economic stratification will be much like what Latin America has been historically. If you go to Brazil, that skin color gets darker as the jobs gets more dirty and dangerous and the high-rises turn into favelas could not be more blatantly obvious, and is merely taken for granted by the locals on some unstated level.

    a) Upwardly mobile native whites will intermarry with East Asians and Eastern Europeans (and other socioeconomically successful groups, like Iranian-Americans-a generally rather secularized bunch thanks to the ghosts of 1979-too) for the ruling and professional castes. This isn't necessarily a bad thing: the kids from these marriages, especially the ones involving a native white tech nerd strongly alienated from his own culture marrying a high-octane Chinese Phd, tend to be seriously smart cookies. The main thing is making sure that they don't turn into SJWs, and for the male offspring, soyboys.

    b) Downwardly mobile ones will largely intermarry with Hispanics and increasingly create a Spanish patois speaking proletariat that our elites are going to have an increasingly difficult time figuring out what to do with as mass underemployment skyrockets in the next decade.

    c) Native underclass black men who are capable of escaping the poverty trap will do everything in their power to outmarry, an entirely understandable desire given what they deal with from their own women. Very hard not to have sympathy for them here, as Bill P has mentioned-they really get screwed by both their women and the administrative state. Think what WWC guys go through on massive steroids. Those that don't... well, as America gets ironically more racially exclusive in practice as our oligarchs get more "racially sensitive", hard to see inner city districts not going the way of Indian reservations.

    d) The same goes for upwardly mobile Central American migrants, if not more so, given that they come from societies where getting a pale-skinned, Euro-descended partner is one of the biggest signs of social success. For young men, that's the sign of having made it to respectable society against the odds, Horatio Alger style. For a young woman, bearing the kids of a white man historically meant they had improved prospects and semi-legitimate status. And once they are up, they start kicking those who remain down, in time-honored Central American fashion. That the lefties can't seem to understand this very basic, ingrained trait of Central American societies never ceases to amuse me.

    Mexico is a little different, because it borders the US and thus can actually claim US territory (think: why is La Raza *Mexican*, not El Salvadoran?), has a substantial if unstable middle class, and is far less overall indio. They aren't the same, and tensions do exist that the Goodwhites manage to smooth over by anti-native "flyover white" propaganda. It works for now, but as 2016 proved, the Coalition of the Fringes strategy has its flaws. A little known historical fact: the reason MS-13 was originally formed was because of Salvadoran immigrants needing to protect each other from Mexican gangs, and because Salvadorans couldn't get jobs in industries dominated by Mexicans who'd refuse to hire them-and the accent would easily give them away, even without the indio features and skin color.

    There's some more detail I can go into, like the often tense relationship between African African immigrants and native African-Americans or how South America works very, very differently from Central America, or how most South Asians (though exceptions obviously do exist: I don't know for sure, but I think Razib Khan is married to a non-South Asian woman) are still rather inclusive with each other, but I need to get back to my code.

    , @Giant Duck
    @Tiny Duck

    Do they listen to you? You come across as unhinged here, so I would have to imagine that you are even less coherent in person.

    Usually young white men will nod along to obvious nonsense, and then do whatever they were going to do anyway, shuffling bad influences off to the side as mere distractions. That must really gall you.

  121. @peterike
    @Anonymous


    The 2018 MOCA gala honoring one of its artist board members, Mark Grotjahn. After the event was announced, Grotjahn withdrew his acceptance of the honor, citing rumblings of constituent concern about a lack of diversity among the museum’s three previous gala honorees, all of whom have been straight, white men.
     
    Maybe Grotjahn understood, deep down, that he is just another purveyor of garbage art, and felt embarrassed at being honored.

    http://www.artfronts.com/images/MoMA-FN/MoMA-Mark%20Grotjhan/Mark%20Grotjahn-09.jpg

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    Hey, WT?? I swear that’s … he stole his whole theme from a painting that I saw at my kid’s preschool by a kid named Connor! The last I saw of it, the 4 year-olds teacher had put it in his cubby ….

    Unbe-frickin-lievable! If I were the donors, yeah, I’d want my 1.4 million back.

  122. Exactly, this is all individual, and Hillary reveals either a deep bias or (more likely) she’s just subscribing to the “women are under the thumb of their eeevil husbands” because that’s, well, feminism. It’s so weird. If we believe feminists, women are such pathetic creatures, with no agency whatever.

    But there’s another reason: getting married just makes people, especially men, more conservative, and when a man gets married, he’s automatically hooked into the cycle of life that his young manhood is dedicated to denying.

  123. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @Doug


    Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBjPAqmnvGA

    Replies: @Brutusale

    A college roommate, a violinist, used to busk on the MBTA station platforms. His fiddle got him more ass than Charmin.

  124. @anon
    @Annatar

    Amazing. Where is Snopes? I trust you. Should I?

    Replies: @anon

    OK. Roughly she is full of s**t.
    Calif. 62% 32% 3% 100% 14.17
    D.C. 91% 4% 2% 100% 0.68
    Hawaii 62% 30% 4% 100% 0.46
    Md. 60% 34% 3% 100% 2.07
    Mass. 60% 33% 4% 100% 2.73
    N.Y. 59% 37% 2% 100% 6.32
    R.I. 54% 39% 3% 100%
    Vt. 57% 30% 7% 100%
    Conn. 55% 41% 3% 100% 1.4
    Del. 53% 42% 3% 100% 0.39
    Ill. 55% 38% 4% 100% 4.3
    Me. 48% 45% 5% 100%
    N.J. 55% 41% 2% 100% 3.11
    N.M. 48% 40% 9% 100%
    Ore. 50% 39% 5% 100% 1.24
    Wash. 53% 37% 5% 100% 2.58
    Colo. 48% 43% 5% 100% 1.74
    Minn. 46% 45% 4% 100% 1.83
    Nev. 48% 46% 3% 100% 0.79
    N.H. 47% 47% 4% 100%
    Va. 50% 44% 3% 100% 2

    46% for all Dem states greater than 1%

    • Replies: @anon
    @anon

    Annatar is right.

  125. @Neoconned
    @Berty

    People like to insult whiskey and call him a virgin bitch or whatever.....BUT nobody ever seems to explain to me....how exactly is he wrong?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Rosie

    I have explained numerous times how and why he is wrong:

    (1) Women’s voting patterns are not invariably leftist.
    (2) Women are not primarily to blame for mass immigration.
    (3) Women do not need to be dominated.
    (4) Women are not averse to marriage.

    Every single thing he says is against the weight of the evidence. Women only vote for leftist policies when they are manipulated into doing so by educational elites; the fact that they are subject to such manipulation of course disproves the idea that women only understand force. There is no evidence whatsoever that women are refusing suitable marriage partners. There is a shortage of these due to economic policies desired by male elites and their demands for cheap labor.

    I’m not saying women bear no responsibility for the plight of the West; only that they are not more at fault than men.

    • Replies: @Whiskey
    @Rosie

    Single White women in every election in the West since 1970 vote far more leftist than men.

    That's a fact female excuse making and White Knighting won't change

    Women love love love their rapefugees. Rapefygees Welcome! Women support open borders.

    Women sure as a Twilight FiftyShades double bill need to be dominated. That's proven by female behavior over and over again. I want a man equal to me said no woman ever.

    Women are noit averse to marriage to Alphas. Beta males its desperation pushing 35 time.

    There was no Men's march on DC to scream at Trump. That was all pussy hsts

    Replies: @Rosie

    , @Twodees Partain
    @Rosie

    Rosie, it's possible that both you and Whiskey are wrong because you're both claiming that most women exhibit the behavior that the two of you are describing.

    , @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    With respect if you can't see what he's saying about the negrophilia as some call it here of the female under 25 crowd go look at social media.

    Men generally speaking want to marry young and white women want to have fun and screw black dudes til 35 and then panic marry prince charming.

    I don't really have an agenda w regards to his opinions but I read his comments in passing and find myself very strongly agreeing with them in terms of evolutionary behavior amongst women

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

  126. @anon
    @anon

    OK. Roughly she is full of s**t.
    Calif. 62% 32% 3% 100% 14.17
    D.C. 91% 4% 2% 100% 0.68
    Hawaii 62% 30% 4% 100% 0.46
    Md. 60% 34% 3% 100% 2.07
    Mass. 60% 33% 4% 100% 2.73
    N.Y. 59% 37% 2% 100% 6.32
    R.I. 54% 39% 3% 100%
    Vt. 57% 30% 7% 100%
    Conn. 55% 41% 3% 100% 1.4
    Del. 53% 42% 3% 100% 0.39
    Ill. 55% 38% 4% 100% 4.3
    Me. 48% 45% 5% 100%
    N.J. 55% 41% 2% 100% 3.11
    N.M. 48% 40% 9% 100%
    Ore. 50% 39% 5% 100% 1.24
    Wash. 53% 37% 5% 100% 2.58
    Colo. 48% 43% 5% 100% 1.74
    Minn. 46% 45% 4% 100% 1.83
    Nev. 48% 46% 3% 100% 0.79
    N.H. 47% 47% 4% 100%
    Va. 50% 44% 3% 100% 2

    46% for all Dem states greater than 1%

    Replies: @anon

    Annatar is right.

  127. @Anonymous
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KKPpjN5PTc

    Replies: @AndrewR

    Who is worse: Hillary, or the people who think she is a good person and would be a good leader?

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @AndrewR

    "Who is worse: Hillary, or the people who think she is a good person and would be a good leader?"

    Isn't that like trying to decide which turd is an uglier shade of brown?

  128. @ia
    @Silva

    Not if they lose affirmative action quotas, disadvantaged government quotas, Title IX privileges, and divorce rape laws, they sure as hell aren't going to vote for lower taxes. Liberal, single, urban women want a lot of cops around, blacks hate the police. That's the wedge.

    Replies: @Rosie

    I don’t know about that. In fact, I’m not sure how much White women really benefit from affirmative action. I suspect so many women are concentrated in pink collar professional jobs that affirmative action isn’t that much of a factor. They are not actually interested in fields where affirmative action would benefit them most, i.e. STEM.

    What do you mean by Title IX privileges? Have you got a problem with women being athletes? I would think promoting women’s athletics would be a good investment in the future, for the sake of health care costs if nothing else.

    And what is this “divorce rape” I keep hearing about? I suspect there are legitimate grievances in this area, but I’ve never seen it spelled out in detail.

    • Replies: @ia
    @Rosie

    Thank you for responding. Over 57% of college students, if this is correct, are now women. Is this equality? Has it ever occurred to you that women and blacks might be parasites?

    Title IX goes far beyond athletics.

    Divorce rape is women filing 70% of divorce lawsuits in the US. They know they will win.

    Replies: @Rosie

  129. What that map doesn’t show you is that I won the places that own two thirds of America’s Gross Domestic product. I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward.

    My God – where did she come up with that. Fact checker? Number challenged.

  130. @Tiny Duck
    @Giant Duck

    I encourage them to

    1) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    2) they need to concentrate their privileged position on giving up some of their unearned power and not to focus on romance

    Replies: @Briny Schmuck, @nebulafox, @Giant Duck

    I encourage cishet white men to

    1) sterilize themselves

    or

    2) become celibate

    or

    3) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    4) die out

    Only when white men no longer produce offspring will the world be a better place. Just read Leonard Pitts.

  131. @Tiny Duck
    This is why I encourage my white female students to only date Men of Color

    The only reason white girls vote the wrong way is to protect their white husbands and kids

    If they don't have white husbands and kids and instead had Husbands and Children of Color then they would vote for positive candidates

    Demographic change will fix things but it take some time

    Replies: @fish, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Giant Duck, @ia

    Tiny Duck, has it ever occurred to you that you may at some future date be found out and brought to justice?

    • LOL: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @ia

    There is no evidence that Tiny Duck has the capability of thinking about the future. The Duck sold his soul. The Duck thinks zombie thoughts, and makes zombie posts. The Duck is a mediocre zombie.

    Replies: @ia

  132. @Jim Don Bob
    @Neoconned

    I hear Whiskey saying that the feminization of Western Civilization is a bad idea, and I agree. White men built it, and the POCs are incapable of running it. He can be a bit TOO TOO TOO dramatic for some people's taste.

    Replies: @Rosie

    I don’t think he’s saying that. I think he’s saying it’s women’s fault. Those are two different things. Elites benefit from the feminization of Western men, which allows them to import cheap labor and demand that male taxpayers subsidize it without worrying about a “xenophobic” backlash.

  133. Google Hillary Clinton and Men’s Issues or Men’s Rights and you will get the following in order:

    Women’s Rights and Opportunity

    Hillary Clinton lost because of sexism

    The Men who cost Clinton the election

    Or a little further down the list:

    Stop asking powerful women to fix bad men

    The truth is you could scroll to the bottom of the short list and you would not find one thing she has ever done exclusively for the benefit of men. Not even once, because she never has. Just extreme indifference.

    Ironically, had Hillary won, the “resistance” would all be coming from men now. You would have seen two generations of organizing in four years. As much as she makes me ill, it almost would have been worth it.

  134. @Rosie
    @ia

    I don't know about that. In fact, I'm not sure how much White women really benefit from affirmative action. I suspect so many women are concentrated in pink collar professional jobs that affirmative action isn't that much of a factor. They are not actually interested in fields where affirmative action would benefit them most, i.e. STEM.

    What do you mean by Title IX privileges? Have you got a problem with women being athletes? I would think promoting women's athletics would be a good investment in the future, for the sake of health care costs if nothing else.

    And what is this "divorce rape" I keep hearing about? I suspect there are legitimate grievances in this area, but I've never seen it spelled out in detail.

    Replies: @ia

    Thank you for responding. Over 57% of college students, if this is correct, are now women. Is this equality? Has it ever occurred to you that women and blacks might be parasites?

    Title IX goes far beyond athletics.

    Divorce rape is women filing 70% of divorce lawsuits in the US. They know they will win.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @ia

    "Over 57% of college students."

    That is not equal for sure. It's a problem, but I don't think it's women's fault, nor do I think women would be unwilling to support efforts to change this. You have to remember we have sons.

    Yes, some women are parasites. So what? The traditional order is that men make and women take, at least in post-agrarian society. We're busy caring for home and children. Do you support that or not?

    "Title IX goes far beyond athletics."

    It might help if you clarify what exactly you have a problem with then. I'm glad to hear you support women's athletics. Healthy mom --happy family.

    "Divorce rape"

    The fact that they know they will win doesn't mean their filing is unjust. The morally relevant question is not who filed, but rather who is at fault for the breakdown of the marriage. I'm not saying I know for sure that men are not mistreated in divorce court. I'm just saying that you haven't come close to making a case for divorce rape.

    Even if you are able to make such a case, you still fail to take into account that we have sons. No grandmother wants to be shut out of her grandkids' lives because of a frivolous divorce. This is the essential point you need to understand. We are not interested in policies that are unfair to our own families.

    Replies: @ia

  135. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I have explained numerous times how and why he is wrong:

    (1) Women's voting patterns are not invariably leftist.
    (2) Women are not primarily to blame for mass immigration.
    (3) Women do not need to be dominated.
    (4) Women are not averse to marriage.

    Every single thing he says is against the weight of the evidence. Women only vote for leftist policies when they are manipulated into doing so by educational elites; the fact that they are subject to such manipulation of course disproves the idea that women only understand force. There is no evidence whatsoever that women are refusing suitable marriage partners. There is a shortage of these due to economic policies desired by male elites and their demands for cheap labor.

    I'm not saying women bear no responsibility for the plight of the West; only that they are not more at fault than men.

    Replies: @Whiskey, @Twodees Partain, @Neoconned

    Single White women in every election in the West since 1970 vote far more leftist than men.

    That’s a fact female excuse making and White Knighting won’t change

    Women love love love their rapefugees. Rapefygees Welcome! Women support open borders.

    Women sure as a Twilight FiftyShades double bill need to be dominated. That’s proven by female behavior over and over again. I want a man equal to me said no woman ever.

    Women are noit averse to marriage to Alphas. Beta males its desperation pushing 35 time.

    There was no Men’s march on DC to scream at Trump. That was all pussy hsts

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Whiskey

    Evidence: none.

  136. @Tiny Duck
    @Giant Duck

    I encourage them to

    1) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    2) they need to concentrate their privileged position on giving up some of their unearned power and not to focus on romance

    Replies: @Briny Schmuck, @nebulafox, @Giant Duck

    I should know better than respond to the troll, but alas, the opportunity to be ‘a throwing salt proves to override my better judgement.

    My brown-skinned, Southeast Asian girlfriend would be very unhappy with your suggestions, TD: like the overwhelming majority of women irrespective of race, she prefers to be the one getting boned by a man who isn’t getting boned himself, and who generally isn’t effeminate. Here, they are quite open about that. In the US, less so, but it still comes out on online dating sites good and clear. And like most women around these parts, she likes Asian men or white men, provided they aren’t soyboys, better than blacks or Middle Easterners. See, we generally don’t treat women like property (outside of rough bedtime play, that is), unlike many men from Africa or the Middle East, yet still act like men, unlike our SJW counterparts. It’s all about getting that Aristotlean mean, you know?

    You need to be learn to be less sexist, dude. Women-especially Women of Color-are allowed to have preferences that don’t line up with what you, a privileged white man, want for them. They can handle themselves around white boyfriends-sharing our food, our pool waters, our seed-without getting perverted by our intrinsic badness. How can you have doubted them?

    Now, general observations for my main comment:

    1) This is actually deeply patronizing against women, when you think Hillary’s thought down to its logical conclusion. Even some of the WaPo commentators are calling her out on that, for what it is worth. It really showcases just how *bad* of a politician she is. Trump should do everything in his power to keep her prominent: it hurts the Democrats, big time.

    2) Mass importation of East and South Asians is a very strange way of trying to combat racism against black people or Central Americans, as anybody who has lived over here would be happy to tell you. The open borders advocates are simultaneously making whites more racially conscious while importing vast amounts of people from societies far less touched by political correctness and possessing no sense of obligation to historically ill-treated minorities in the US. How this will end well for them, it is hard to say. Another problem lies in the fact that Central American campesinos carry their own attitudes about racial hierarchies with them across the border: and hint, hint, they want lighter skinned partners, both the men and the women.

    3) Ironically enough, I suspect brave new “diverse” America is going to prove to be far more stratified socioeconomically according to race than America circa around the last three decades of the 21st Century were. Ironically enough, the Reagan years were probably the closest we got to a relatively socioeconomically race-blind society, things like the crack epidemic and inner cities going from bad to intolerable aside: after the CR Movement and related changes, but before crony-capitalism and mass immigration/free trade really began to take off and destroy the fragile foundations of it all. Though many blacks remained deprived and massively poor, it was substantially less than previous decades, and this was before emigration from Africa proper became a thing, allowing high-octane Nigerian immigrant kids (ironically, probably the descendants of those who sold the slaves) to be claimed as AA quota students by elite colleges rather than having to deal with native blacks.

    Even the NYT was willing to admit this:

    https://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/10/us/study-finds-gains-for-black-middle-class.html

    This highly racially-based economic stratification will be much like what Latin America has been historically. If you go to Brazil, that skin color gets darker as the jobs gets more dirty and dangerous and the high-rises turn into favelas could not be more blatantly obvious, and is merely taken for granted by the locals on some unstated level.

    a) Upwardly mobile native whites will intermarry with East Asians and Eastern Europeans (and other socioeconomically successful groups, like Iranian-Americans-a generally rather secularized bunch thanks to the ghosts of 1979-too) for the ruling and professional castes. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing: the kids from these marriages, especially the ones involving a native white tech nerd strongly alienated from his own culture marrying a high-octane Chinese Phd, tend to be seriously smart cookies. The main thing is making sure that they don’t turn into SJWs, and for the male offspring, soyboys.

    b) Downwardly mobile ones will largely intermarry with Hispanics and increasingly create a Spanish patois speaking proletariat that our elites are going to have an increasingly difficult time figuring out what to do with as mass underemployment skyrockets in the next decade.

    c) Native underclass black men who are capable of escaping the poverty trap will do everything in their power to outmarry, an entirely understandable desire given what they deal with from their own women. Very hard not to have sympathy for them here, as Bill P has mentioned-they really get screwed by both their women and the administrative state. Think what WWC guys go through on massive steroids. Those that don’t… well, as America gets ironically more racially exclusive in practice as our oligarchs get more “racially sensitive”, hard to see inner city districts not going the way of Indian reservations.

    d) The same goes for upwardly mobile Central American migrants, if not more so, given that they come from societies where getting a pale-skinned, Euro-descended partner is one of the biggest signs of social success. For young men, that’s the sign of having made it to respectable society against the odds, Horatio Alger style. For a young woman, bearing the kids of a white man historically meant they had improved prospects and semi-legitimate status. And once they are up, they start kicking those who remain down, in time-honored Central American fashion. That the lefties can’t seem to understand this very basic, ingrained trait of Central American societies never ceases to amuse me.

    Mexico is a little different, because it borders the US and thus can actually claim US territory (think: why is La Raza *Mexican*, not El Salvadoran?), has a substantial if unstable middle class, and is far less overall indio. They aren’t the same, and tensions do exist that the Goodwhites manage to smooth over by anti-native “flyover white” propaganda. It works for now, but as 2016 proved, the Coalition of the Fringes strategy has its flaws. A little known historical fact: the reason MS-13 was originally formed was because of Salvadoran immigrants needing to protect each other from Mexican gangs, and because Salvadorans couldn’t get jobs in industries dominated by Mexicans who’d refuse to hire them-and the accent would easily give them away, even without the indio features and skin color.

    There’s some more detail I can go into, like the often tense relationship between African African immigrants and native African-Americans or how South America works very, very differently from Central America, or how most South Asians (though exceptions obviously do exist: I don’t know for sure, but I think Razib Khan is married to a non-South Asian woman) are still rather inclusive with each other, but I need to get back to my code.

  137. @ia
    @Tiny Duck

    Tiny Duck, has it ever occurred to you that you may at some future date be found out and brought to justice?

    Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson

    There is no evidence that Tiny Duck has the capability of thinking about the future. The Duck sold his soul. The Duck thinks zombie thoughts, and makes zombie posts. The Duck is a mediocre zombie.

    • Replies: @ia
    @Charles Erwin Wilson

    Oh, I don't know. He's more or less in control. He knows what he's doing and he likes it.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

  138. @ia
    @Rosie

    Thank you for responding. Over 57% of college students, if this is correct, are now women. Is this equality? Has it ever occurred to you that women and blacks might be parasites?

    Title IX goes far beyond athletics.

    Divorce rape is women filing 70% of divorce lawsuits in the US. They know they will win.

    Replies: @Rosie

    “Over 57% of college students.”

    That is not equal for sure. It’s a problem, but I don’t think it’s women’s fault, nor do I think women would be unwilling to support efforts to change this. You have to remember we have sons.

    Yes, some women are parasites. So what? The traditional order is that men make and women take, at least in post-agrarian society. We’re busy caring for home and children. Do you support that or not?

    “Title IX goes far beyond athletics.”

    It might help if you clarify what exactly you have a problem with then. I’m glad to hear you support women’s athletics. Healthy mom –happy family.

    “Divorce rape”

    The fact that they know they will win doesn’t mean their filing is unjust. The morally relevant question is not who filed, but rather who is at fault for the breakdown of the marriage. I’m not saying I know for sure that men are not mistreated in divorce court. I’m just saying that you haven’t come close to making a case for divorce rape.

    Even if you are able to make such a case, you still fail to take into account that we have sons. No grandmother wants to be shut out of her grandkids’ lives because of a frivolous divorce. This is the essential point you need to understand. We are not interested in policies that are unfair to our own families.

    • Replies: @ia
    @Rosie

    Rosie, you are right. But I fear white men brought this upon themselves and they will pay dearly.

    You need to read iSteve about Title IX and Haven Montana and UVA and more if you love your boys.

  139. @anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Hillary talking about the 2016 election---in India. India!!! Hillary being Hillary again. I wonder how many of the "bhistis" really care.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    No one really cares what Hillary has to say. It’s all meaningless boilerplate. As has often been noted, she couldn’t fill a high school auditorium during the campaign. Now if she would talk openly and honestly about all the shenanigans she’s been involved in, I’d be on the edge of my seat.

  140. @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @ia

    There is no evidence that Tiny Duck has the capability of thinking about the future. The Duck sold his soul. The Duck thinks zombie thoughts, and makes zombie posts. The Duck is a mediocre zombie.

    Replies: @ia

    Oh, I don’t know. He’s more or less in control. He knows what he’s doing and he likes it.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @ia

    The Duck abides.

  141. @Rosie
    @ia

    "Over 57% of college students."

    That is not equal for sure. It's a problem, but I don't think it's women's fault, nor do I think women would be unwilling to support efforts to change this. You have to remember we have sons.

    Yes, some women are parasites. So what? The traditional order is that men make and women take, at least in post-agrarian society. We're busy caring for home and children. Do you support that or not?

    "Title IX goes far beyond athletics."

    It might help if you clarify what exactly you have a problem with then. I'm glad to hear you support women's athletics. Healthy mom --happy family.

    "Divorce rape"

    The fact that they know they will win doesn't mean their filing is unjust. The morally relevant question is not who filed, but rather who is at fault for the breakdown of the marriage. I'm not saying I know for sure that men are not mistreated in divorce court. I'm just saying that you haven't come close to making a case for divorce rape.

    Even if you are able to make such a case, you still fail to take into account that we have sons. No grandmother wants to be shut out of her grandkids' lives because of a frivolous divorce. This is the essential point you need to understand. We are not interested in policies that are unfair to our own families.

    Replies: @ia

    Rosie, you are right. But I fear white men brought this upon themselves and they will pay dearly.

    You need to read iSteve about Title IX and Haven Montana and UVA and more if you love your boys.

  142. @WorkingClass
    Some Democrats have noticed that perpetually insulting half of the electorate is bad for business.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-14/democrats-cringe-hillary-declares-blue-states-are-more-economically-advanced

    Do you suppose that some Democrats would like to silence Jimmy Kimmel?

    Replies: @Bernardista

    Some Democrats have noticed that perpetually insulting half of the electorate is bad for business..

    Because that half of the electorate is the one that actually goes out and votes.

    Do you suppose that some Democrats would like to silence Jimmy Kimmel?

    Tip of the iceberg, my friend. They would also have to put a gag order on 90% of white elitist celebrities who can’t seem to get through a monologue without the obligatory dig at white males.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Bernardista

    Kimmel in particular has never been funny. I remember hating him before he became an activist. For a lot of these celebrities, SJW membership is a Faustian bargain that kills any possibility of wider appeal but does guarantee a certain audience. Of course, if we had actual free speech in the legacy media, that wouldn't be an issue because there'd be different counterparts.

  143. @Bernardista
    @WorkingClass


    Some Democrats have noticed that perpetually insulting half of the electorate is bad for business..
     
    Because that half of the electorate is the one that actually goes out and votes.

    Do you suppose that some Democrats would like to silence Jimmy Kimmel?
     
    Tip of the iceberg, my friend. They would also have to put a gag order on 90% of white elitist celebrities who can't seem to get through a monologue without the obligatory dig at white males.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    Kimmel in particular has never been funny. I remember hating him before he became an activist. For a lot of these celebrities, SJW membership is a Faustian bargain that kills any possibility of wider appeal but does guarantee a certain audience. Of course, if we had actual free speech in the legacy media, that wouldn’t be an issue because there’d be different counterparts.

  144. @Paleo Liberal
    @Doug

    Something interesting -- in tribal societies, it is/was forbidden for women to drum.

    Men could drum and chant, women danced. Sometimes men could dance as well, but women would NEVER drum and chant.

    Try going to a pow-wow sometime. You will never see a woman drumming.

    I don't know what it is about women and drums, but it seems to go against hundreds of thousands of years of society.

    Replies: @anon

    As a drummer I can tell you – only THE MAN can handle the stick.

  145. @Reactionary Utopian
    @Twodees Partain


    “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.”

    It certainly hasn’t worked for Charlie Daniels, so you’re probably right.
     

    Well, what Charlie Daniels does, he does with a violin, but he fiddles, which is a whole different art. I play the violin, but I don't fiddle. A whole different thing, that is. Fiddling is more difficult in some ways, easier in others ... but entirely different.

    As for never getting anyone laid in a hundred years, the original commenter obviously doesn't play the violin (nor, probably, does he fiddle). I now testify that playing the violin got me laid, or at least didn't set the project back any, within the last three years. I played a solo arrangement of "Over the Rainbow." I played it high; I played it sweet. She got all misty-eyed. And before much longer, she got all naked, and busy. I doubt if it even matters what instrument. Play it reasonably well, play something sentimental, and play it for her, and I think it'll strengthen your case considerably.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Rosie

    Ah, but have you considered the possibility that she meant to give you some whether you played the violin or displayed your prowess with a can opener while feeding her cats? Maybe she just had the hots for you despite your violining.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Twodees Partain

    I'm going with the violin. Women consider a one-night stand with musicians to be a privilege and honor. They brag about it, like guys do I mean. Not athletes, not rich guys, just musicians.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain

  146. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I have explained numerous times how and why he is wrong:

    (1) Women's voting patterns are not invariably leftist.
    (2) Women are not primarily to blame for mass immigration.
    (3) Women do not need to be dominated.
    (4) Women are not averse to marriage.

    Every single thing he says is against the weight of the evidence. Women only vote for leftist policies when they are manipulated into doing so by educational elites; the fact that they are subject to such manipulation of course disproves the idea that women only understand force. There is no evidence whatsoever that women are refusing suitable marriage partners. There is a shortage of these due to economic policies desired by male elites and their demands for cheap labor.

    I'm not saying women bear no responsibility for the plight of the West; only that they are not more at fault than men.

    Replies: @Whiskey, @Twodees Partain, @Neoconned

    Rosie, it’s possible that both you and Whiskey are wrong because you’re both claiming that most women exhibit the behavior that the two of you are describing.

  147. @AndrewR
    @Anonymous

    Who is worse: Hillary, or the people who think she is a good person and would be a good leader?

    Replies: @Twodees Partain

    “Who is worse: Hillary, or the people who think she is a good person and would be a good leader?”

    Isn’t that like trying to decide which turd is an uglier shade of brown?

  148. And then there’s the white women who won’t be falling in love with anyone…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5503615/Convicted-murderer-denied-clemency-one-day-execution.html

    1977. 1977. He’s enjoyed over 40 years of free room, board, and entertainment (not to mention legal appeals) courtesy of taxpayers like you.

  149. @Twodees Partain
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Ah, but have you considered the possibility that she meant to give you some whether you played the violin or displayed your prowess with a can opener while feeding her cats? Maybe she just had the hots for you despite your violining.

    Replies: @Rosie

    I’m going with the violin. Women consider a one-night stand with musicians to be a privilege and honor. They brag about it, like guys do I mean. Not athletes, not rich guys, just musicians.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Rosie

    Be that as it may, I was simply trying to keep the joke going. I'm sure you're right about that. Sturgill Simpson makes a reference to that kind of womanly conquest in one of his songs:

    "Someday if I'm standing on some big old stage
    And you're down in the crowd
    Trying to tell your friends I used to know him when
    But in your heart you'll know it ain't true somehow"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4MaFeim6rA

  150. @Tiny Duck
    @Giant Duck

    I encourage them to

    1) explore the full range of sexuality and fluidity of gender

    or

    2) they need to concentrate their privileged position on giving up some of their unearned power and not to focus on romance

    Replies: @Briny Schmuck, @nebulafox, @Giant Duck

    Do they listen to you? You come across as unhinged here, so I would have to imagine that you are even less coherent in person.

    Usually young white men will nod along to obvious nonsense, and then do whatever they were going to do anyway, shuffling bad influences off to the side as mere distractions. That must really gall you.

  151. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I have explained numerous times how and why he is wrong:

    (1) Women's voting patterns are not invariably leftist.
    (2) Women are not primarily to blame for mass immigration.
    (3) Women do not need to be dominated.
    (4) Women are not averse to marriage.

    Every single thing he says is against the weight of the evidence. Women only vote for leftist policies when they are manipulated into doing so by educational elites; the fact that they are subject to such manipulation of course disproves the idea that women only understand force. There is no evidence whatsoever that women are refusing suitable marriage partners. There is a shortage of these due to economic policies desired by male elites and their demands for cheap labor.

    I'm not saying women bear no responsibility for the plight of the West; only that they are not more at fault than men.

    Replies: @Whiskey, @Twodees Partain, @Neoconned

    With respect if you can’t see what he’s saying about the negrophilia as some call it here of the female under 25 crowd go look at social media.

    Men generally speaking want to marry young and white women want to have fun and screw black dudes til 35 and then panic marry prince charming.

    I don’t really have an agenda w regards to his opinions but I read his comments in passing and find myself very strongly agreeing with them in terms of evolutionary behavior amongst women

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I don't know about that, but I will tell you this. You just proved right there that women are not the problem. Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women's nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn't it a thing 30 years ago. It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?

    Moreover, you are flat-out wrong about how men are acting. Indeed, it seems to me you've got it perfectly backwards. It's men who want to screw around till they're 35, and then get married when they've started to go bald. The only way to resolve this sort of thing is hard data, which nobody seems to have.

    FWIW, I have come to understand that there is a great deal of dishonesty about the so-called 80/20 rule. It seems to be men rather than women who tend to hold out for mates out of their league when you look at actual contacts rather than stated perceptions of attractiveness.

    https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e

    Replies: @dfordoom

    , @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    Wouldn't it be ironic if White men owed their extraordinary achievements to White women who cucked their husbands with musicians and got away with it?

    http://www.science20.com/news_releases/do_musicians_have_higher_iqs_than_non_musicians_yes_says_study

    Whiskey?

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Neoconned

  152. @Charles Pewitt
    @Clyde

    Elizabeth Holmes says "the goal is to empower the individual."

    Elizabeth Holmes was running a con on greedy investors. Elizabeth Holmes repeated buzz words in an Addams Family TV show Lurch voice and the greedy slobs ate it up.

    Greedy geezers were all too eager to help give her scam some veneer of believability by taking big cash to haunt the board of Theranos. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was one of the greedy geezer rodents to take cash from Elizabeth Holmes. Mattis should be immediately fired by President Trump.

    https://twitter.com/RudyHavenstein/status/973991879627821056

    Replies: @Neoconned

    I don’t see a scam here just greedy stupid investors getting even

    • Replies: @EdwardM
    @Neoconned

    Agree. The bar should be very high for asserting fraud in these kind of private investments (and I suppose it is).

    It will be interesting to see if a fair biography of Holmes is ever written. Was she a true believer, caught up in her own hubris and hype repeatedly affirmed by the culture, or simply out to perpetrate fraud on gullible old men and media from the beginning? I suspect the former and don't feel sorry in the least bit for her sucker investors.

  153. @ia
    @Charles Erwin Wilson

    Oh, I don't know. He's more or less in control. He knows what he's doing and he likes it.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    The Duck abides.

  154. @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    With respect if you can't see what he's saying about the negrophilia as some call it here of the female under 25 crowd go look at social media.

    Men generally speaking want to marry young and white women want to have fun and screw black dudes til 35 and then panic marry prince charming.

    I don't really have an agenda w regards to his opinions but I read his comments in passing and find myself very strongly agreeing with them in terms of evolutionary behavior amongst women

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

    I don’t know about that, but I will tell you this. You just proved right there that women are not the problem. Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women’s nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn’t it a thing 30 years ago. It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?

    Moreover, you are flat-out wrong about how men are acting. Indeed, it seems to me you’ve got it perfectly backwards. It’s men who want to screw around till they’re 35, and then get married when they’ve started to go bald. The only way to resolve this sort of thing is hard data, which nobody seems to have.

    FWIW, I have come to understand that there is a great deal of dishonesty about the so-called 80/20 rule. It seems to be men rather than women who tend to hold out for mates out of their league when you look at actual contacts rather than stated perceptions of attractiveness.

    https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    @Rosie


    Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women’s nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn’t it a thing 30 years ago.
     
    It wasn't a thing in the past because women couldn't get away with it. There were rules of social behaviour, largely enforced by other women, that prevented young women from indulging in self-destructive behaviour.

    It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?
     
    Feminists.

    Replies: @Rosie

  155. @Reactionary Utopian
    @Twodees Partain


    “Playing the violin hasn’t gotten anyone laid in 100 years.”

    It certainly hasn’t worked for Charlie Daniels, so you’re probably right.
     

    Well, what Charlie Daniels does, he does with a violin, but he fiddles, which is a whole different art. I play the violin, but I don't fiddle. A whole different thing, that is. Fiddling is more difficult in some ways, easier in others ... but entirely different.

    As for never getting anyone laid in a hundred years, the original commenter obviously doesn't play the violin (nor, probably, does he fiddle). I now testify that playing the violin got me laid, or at least didn't set the project back any, within the last three years. I played a solo arrangement of "Over the Rainbow." I played it high; I played it sweet. She got all misty-eyed. And before much longer, she got all naked, and busy. I doubt if it even matters what instrument. Play it reasonably well, play something sentimental, and play it for her, and I think it'll strengthen your case considerably.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Rosie

    Check this out:

    https://mic.com/articles/104964/science-finally-explains-why-talented-musicians-are-so-damn-sexy#.RvBMNXyBM

    If you want a quality appraisal of a musical composition, ask your wife sometime during days 6-14 of her menstrual cycle. Apparently, we are especially perceptive of musical ability at peak fertility, suggesting that musicians are attractive for casual encounters. I was right. Imagine that!

    To any guy who suspects he’s been cucked for Caleb Followill: Be a good sport and consider it a service to your people. Your wife has excellent taste.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Rosie

    Caleb's wife: Victoria's Secret Angel Lily Aldridge

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lily_Aldridge

    How does this couple fit into the theory that female sexuality is dysgenic and must be kept strictly under control via White Sharia or couverture or whatever?

  156. @Rosie
    @Reactionary Utopian

    Check this out:

    https://mic.com/articles/104964/science-finally-explains-why-talented-musicians-are-so-damn-sexy#.RvBMNXyBM

    If you want a quality appraisal of a musical composition, ask your wife sometime during days 6-14 of her menstrual cycle. Apparently, we are especially perceptive of musical ability at peak fertility, suggesting that musicians are attractive for casual encounters. I was right. Imagine that!

    To any guy who suspects he's been cucked for Caleb Followill: Be a good sport and consider it a service to your people. Your wife has excellent taste.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnhXHvRoUd0

    Replies: @Rosie

    Caleb’s wife: Victoria’s Secret Angel Lily Aldridge

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lily_Aldridge

    How does this couple fit into the theory that female sexuality is dysgenic and must be kept strictly under control via White Sharia or couverture or whatever?

  157. LOL and you guys probably thought I was exaggerating.

    “Wam, bam, thank-you mam” with “average-sized” Caleb is a “great story for the grandkids.

    http://www.thestylecon.com/2013/12/16/oral-history-sexfiles-fashion-insiders/#!prettyPhoto

    istevers, anyone know of a one-night stand with a football player (or any guy other than a rock star) being referred to as a story for the grandkids?

  158. @Obsessive Contrarian
    @Anonymous

    "I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s GDP. "

    God in heaven, what a bullshit statistic. It's not even worth disproving.

    Can she be any more disgusting than we thought she was? But she should keep talking. It's bad for the Democrats.

    Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson

    Can she be any more disgusting than we thought she was?

    Well, probably not than I thought she was, but the floor for her may be the abyss.

    But she should keep talking. It’s bad for the Democrats.

    True.

  159. @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    With respect if you can't see what he's saying about the negrophilia as some call it here of the female under 25 crowd go look at social media.

    Men generally speaking want to marry young and white women want to have fun and screw black dudes til 35 and then panic marry prince charming.

    I don't really have an agenda w regards to his opinions but I read his comments in passing and find myself very strongly agreeing with them in terms of evolutionary behavior amongst women

    Replies: @Rosie, @Rosie

    Wouldn’t it be ironic if White men owed their extraordinary achievements to White women who cucked their husbands with musicians and got away with it?

    http://www.science20.com/news_releases/do_musicians_have_higher_iqs_than_non_musicians_yes_says_study

    Whiskey?

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    At this point I'm really open to just opening the door to all youngish women 18-45....just bring in say 20-50 million.... OVERNIGHT THE BIRTH RATE would go up....give them 4 years to be married or they'll be deported.....

    Within ONE MONTH of us letting in millions of Salma Hayek looking women the border will shut harder than a clam with a razor blade in it

    Replies: @Rosie

    , @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    BTW what I was talking about was a year ago somebody in the comments section said in a joking manner if all the new immigrants looked like Salma Hayek the wall would slam shut within a week...

    Replies: @Rosie

  160. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    Wouldn't it be ironic if White men owed their extraordinary achievements to White women who cucked their husbands with musicians and got away with it?

    http://www.science20.com/news_releases/do_musicians_have_higher_iqs_than_non_musicians_yes_says_study

    Whiskey?

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Neoconned

    At this point I’m really open to just opening the door to all youngish women 18-45….just bring in say 20-50 million…. OVERNIGHT THE BIRTH RATE would go up….give them 4 years to be married or they’ll be deported…..

    Within ONE MONTH of us letting in millions of Salma Hayek looking women the border will shut harder than a clam with a razor blade in it

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    Will the real race traitor please stand up?

    You see, , the fundamental flaw Whiskey's thinking is this: Women are much more selective than men. As such, it is men who evolve to suit our preferences, not the other way around. If White women wanted mindless thugs, White men would be mindless thugs. It would be reasonable to expect women to show greater ingroup mating preference than men, and indeed that is what the data show.

    https://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

    Replies: @Neoconned

  161. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    Wouldn't it be ironic if White men owed their extraordinary achievements to White women who cucked their husbands with musicians and got away with it?

    http://www.science20.com/news_releases/do_musicians_have_higher_iqs_than_non_musicians_yes_says_study

    Whiskey?

    Replies: @Neoconned, @Neoconned

    BTW what I was talking about was a year ago somebody in the comments section said in a joking manner if all the new immigrants looked like Salma Hayek the wall would slam shut within a week…

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    And here we have a classic case of psychological projection. It is actually only male prejudice that is sexually self-interested in this way. Women actually become more outgroup averse when they are fertile.

    https://scholars.opb.msu.edu/en/publications/race-bias-tracks-conception-risk-across-the-menstrual-cycle-3

    Of course it wouldn't matter even if you were right that women would be more hostile to women immigrants, because we wouldn't have the power to stop it anyway. It's not like the Koch brothers would just roll over and say, "yes OK we'll close the borders now." They need their cheap labor, you know.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/27/koch-brothers-all-in-for-amnesty-we-need-to-know-theres-going-to-be-no-reduction-to-legal-immigration/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/07/pro-mass-immigration-koch-brothers-oppose-trumps-tariffs-it-hurts-the-administration/

    http://fortune.com/2018/01/28/koch-brothers-immigration-daca/

  162. @gunner29
    Do the right thing and repeal the 19th amendment; then the crazy ass bitches can't vote and the shebitch can STFU about why she sucked.

    That amendment was absolutely the dumbest thing this country ever did. All because Wilson was getting shit from feminazis, so he supported the great mistake so they would STFU.

    Replies: @Rosie

    Seriously, do these mouthbreathers ever back up their b.s. with actual evidence or is this really all there is?

  163. @Whiskey
    @Rosie

    Single White women in every election in the West since 1970 vote far more leftist than men.

    That's a fact female excuse making and White Knighting won't change

    Women love love love their rapefugees. Rapefygees Welcome! Women support open borders.

    Women sure as a Twilight FiftyShades double bill need to be dominated. That's proven by female behavior over and over again. I want a man equal to me said no woman ever.

    Women are noit averse to marriage to Alphas. Beta males its desperation pushing 35 time.

    There was no Men's march on DC to scream at Trump. That was all pussy hsts

    Replies: @Rosie

    Evidence: none.

  164. @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    BTW what I was talking about was a year ago somebody in the comments section said in a joking manner if all the new immigrants looked like Salma Hayek the wall would slam shut within a week...

    Replies: @Rosie

    And here we have a classic case of psychological projection. It is actually only male prejudice that is sexually self-interested in this way. Women actually become more outgroup averse when they are fertile.

    https://scholars.opb.msu.edu/en/publications/race-bias-tracks-conception-risk-across-the-menstrual-cycle-3

    Of course it wouldn’t matter even if you were right that women would be more hostile to women immigrants, because we wouldn’t have the power to stop it anyway. It’s not like the Koch brothers would just roll over and say, “yes OK we’ll close the borders now.” They need their cheap labor, you know.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/27/koch-brothers-all-in-for-amnesty-we-need-to-know-theres-going-to-be-no-reduction-to-legal-immigration/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/07/pro-mass-immigration-koch-brothers-oppose-trumps-tariffs-it-hurts-the-administration/

    http://fortune.com/2018/01/28/koch-brothers-immigration-daca/

  165. @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    At this point I'm really open to just opening the door to all youngish women 18-45....just bring in say 20-50 million.... OVERNIGHT THE BIRTH RATE would go up....give them 4 years to be married or they'll be deported.....

    Within ONE MONTH of us letting in millions of Salma Hayek looking women the border will shut harder than a clam with a razor blade in it

    Replies: @Rosie

    Will the real race traitor please stand up?

    You see, , the fundamental flaw Whiskey’s thinking is this: Women are much more selective than men. As such, it is men who evolve to suit our preferences, not the other way around. If White women wanted mindless thugs, White men would be mindless thugs. It would be reasonable to expect women to show greater ingroup mating preference than men, and indeed that is what the data show.

    https://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    I never claimed to be a Klansman or to have a problem with interracial marriage.....just lower class white women spitting out bastard children and asking me to pay for it.

    Like I said, I don't have a dog in the fight, just found the attacks on whiskey to be uniform and monotonous.....

    Replies: @Rosie

  166. @rogue-one
    OT:

    In case people are wondering why Rick Saccone lost.

    >Rick Saccone Asked Mother of Addict What She Would Cut to Fund Opioid Addiction Treatment

    "After telling her about his wife’s dental implants, he asked this woman where she would cut funding to put money into drug treatment. He told her, “We’re going to try to cut the budget, alright? So where do I take it from? Do I take it from education? Do I take it from Alzheimer’s? Do I take it from autistic children? You say you want more funding. Where would you think I should take it from, in those budget line items?” He then paused as if to wait for an answer. I can only imagine how that mother felt."

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2018/03/05/rick-saccone-mother-addict-cut-fund-opioid-addiction/#IoeTPuHHH9UB6tMc.99

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @anonomy, @Berty, @Sarah Toga

    Since Saccone fit so nicely with “The Stupid Party”, does that imply that at least he is not evil?

  167. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    Will the real race traitor please stand up?

    You see, , the fundamental flaw Whiskey's thinking is this: Women are much more selective than men. As such, it is men who evolve to suit our preferences, not the other way around. If White women wanted mindless thugs, White men would be mindless thugs. It would be reasonable to expect women to show greater ingroup mating preference than men, and indeed that is what the data show.

    https://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

    Replies: @Neoconned

    I never claimed to be a Klansman or to have a problem with interracial marriage…..just lower class white women spitting out bastard children and asking me to pay for it.

    Like I said, I don’t have a dog in the fight, just found the attacks on whiskey to be uniform and monotonous…..

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    As I recall, you issued a challenge for someone to say how Whiskey is wrong. Have I done that to your satisfaction?

    What I find tiresome is winning debates with MGTOWs only to have everyone pretend the whole conversation never happened. Not saying you're doing that, but I'll notice and call you out if you do.

    Replies: @Rosie

  168. @Rosie
    @Twodees Partain

    I'm going with the violin. Women consider a one-night stand with musicians to be a privilege and honor. They brag about it, like guys do I mean. Not athletes, not rich guys, just musicians.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain

    Be that as it may, I was simply trying to keep the joke going. I’m sure you’re right about that. Sturgill Simpson makes a reference to that kind of womanly conquest in one of his songs:

    “Someday if I’m standing on some big old stage
    And you’re down in the crowd
    Trying to tell your friends I used to know him when
    But in your heart you’ll know it ain’t true somehow”

  169. @Neoconned
    @Rosie

    I never claimed to be a Klansman or to have a problem with interracial marriage.....just lower class white women spitting out bastard children and asking me to pay for it.

    Like I said, I don't have a dog in the fight, just found the attacks on whiskey to be uniform and monotonous.....

    Replies: @Rosie

    As I recall, you issued a challenge for someone to say how Whiskey is wrong. Have I done that to your satisfaction?

    What I find tiresome is winning debates with MGTOWs only to have everyone pretend the whole conversation never happened. Not saying you’re doing that, but I’ll notice and call you out if you do.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Rosie

    And I would remind you, I don't have to prove that Whiskey is wrong. Since he is the one who constantly attacks women, the burden of proof is on him. All I need to do is show that his case is neither self-evident nor proven such that he is justified in treating his assertions as canonical Truth.

  170. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    As I recall, you issued a challenge for someone to say how Whiskey is wrong. Have I done that to your satisfaction?

    What I find tiresome is winning debates with MGTOWs only to have everyone pretend the whole conversation never happened. Not saying you're doing that, but I'll notice and call you out if you do.

    Replies: @Rosie

    And I would remind you, I don’t have to prove that Whiskey is wrong. Since he is the one who constantly attacks women, the burden of proof is on him. All I need to do is show that his case is neither self-evident nor proven such that he is justified in treating his assertions as canonical Truth.

  171. @Rosie
    @Neoconned

    I don't know about that, but I will tell you this. You just proved right there that women are not the problem. Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women's nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn't it a thing 30 years ago. It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?

    Moreover, you are flat-out wrong about how men are acting. Indeed, it seems to me you've got it perfectly backwards. It's men who want to screw around till they're 35, and then get married when they've started to go bald. The only way to resolve this sort of thing is hard data, which nobody seems to have.

    FWIW, I have come to understand that there is a great deal of dishonesty about the so-called 80/20 rule. It seems to be men rather than women who tend to hold out for mates out of their league when you look at actual contacts rather than stated perceptions of attractiveness.

    https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e

    Replies: @dfordoom

    Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women’s nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn’t it a thing 30 years ago.

    It wasn’t a thing in the past because women couldn’t get away with it. There were rules of social behaviour, largely enforced by other women, that prevented young women from indulging in self-destructive behaviour.

    It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?

    Feminists.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @dfordoom


    It wasn’t a thing in the past because women couldn’t get away with it. There were rules of social behaviour, largely enforced by other women, that prevented young women from indulging in self-destructive behaviour.
     
    Oh yes, the old "You women need to do our dirty work like you did in the good ol' days!" line.

    Um, no. We have never done that, and we're not going to start now.

    I don't know if you were there or not, but I was. Girls of my generation never, ever dated black boys. What's more, we were absolutely terrified of young black men and wouldn't go near them if we could help it. Fear of outgroup males is normal for girls who have not been shamed into repressing it.

    Now, if you're talking about out-of-wedlock sex and/or pregnancy, I'm sorry to tell you this, but that ain't new. It's been a thing since like forever. The difference is that men were shamed into marrying girls they knocked up rather than dumping them for an extended childhood to last until age 32

    Feminists
     
    I'll give you one more guess.
  172. So how do white-American widows vote? Are they permanently altered in political outlook after getting married or do they favor a bigger government safety net after the death of their husbands?

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @Swizzle Stick

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume based on your question that you have a problem with women voters? Is your problem with us that we tend to favor a larger safety net, or that we are biologically driven to import potential mates to kill our sons?

    I'm not trying to be a smart-ass. I'm just asking. Unfortunately, we've never really been given the choice of a safety net plus secure borders, because of course that's national socialism, but I digress.

  173. @dfordoom
    @Rosie


    Why is it only the under 25 crowd? If it has something to do with women’s nature, why is it just now becoming a thing? Why wasn’t it a thing 30 years ago.
     
    It wasn't a thing in the past because women couldn't get away with it. There were rules of social behaviour, largely enforced by other women, that prevented young women from indulging in self-destructive behaviour.

    It seems to be cultural influence, and who exactly is responsible for that?
     
    Feminists.

    Replies: @Rosie

    It wasn’t a thing in the past because women couldn’t get away with it. There were rules of social behaviour, largely enforced by other women, that prevented young women from indulging in self-destructive behaviour.

    Oh yes, the old “You women need to do our dirty work like you did in the good ol’ days!” line.

    Um, no. We have never done that, and we’re not going to start now.

    I don’t know if you were there or not, but I was. Girls of my generation never, ever dated black boys. What’s more, we were absolutely terrified of young black men and wouldn’t go near them if we could help it. Fear of outgroup males is normal for girls who have not been shamed into repressing it.

    Now, if you’re talking about out-of-wedlock sex and/or pregnancy, I’m sorry to tell you this, but that ain’t new. It’s been a thing since like forever. The difference is that men were shamed into marrying girls they knocked up rather than dumping them for an extended childhood to last until age 32

    Feminists

    I’ll give you one more guess.

  174. @Swizzle Stick
    So how do white-American widows vote? Are they permanently altered in political outlook after getting married or do they favor a bigger government safety net after the death of their husbands?

    Replies: @Rosie

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I assume based on your question that you have a problem with women voters? Is your problem with us that we tend to favor a larger safety net, or that we are biologically driven to import potential mates to kill our sons?

    I’m not trying to be a smart-ass. I’m just asking. Unfortunately, we’ve never really been given the choice of a safety net plus secure borders, because of course that’s national socialism, but I digress.

  175. @The Alarmist

    "Happy White Married People Vote Republican, So Why Doesn’t The GOP Work On Making White People Happy?"
     
    Because we cost more than brown people, and the US CoC hates how much we cost, so we must go.

    Replies: @MBlanc46

    For the corporate Repubs and their paymasters, cheap labor is the Holy Grail.

  176. @Jim Don Bob
    http://macqueen.us/hrcShower.jpg

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @MBlanc46

    That was naughty, very naughty.

  177. @Neoconned
    @Charles Pewitt

    I don't see a scam here just greedy stupid investors getting even

    Replies: @EdwardM

    Agree. The bar should be very high for asserting fraud in these kind of private investments (and I suppose it is).

    It will be interesting to see if a fair biography of Holmes is ever written. Was she a true believer, caught up in her own hubris and hype repeatedly affirmed by the culture, or simply out to perpetrate fraud on gullible old men and media from the beginning? I suspect the former and don’t feel sorry in the least bit for her sucker investors.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS