RSS
Only 29% of female undergrads opposed allowing a speaker arguing “White people are collectively responsible for racism & use it to protect their privilege” & 47% opposed allowing a speaker arguing “The police should be abolished b/c they are racist." Men expressed similar views. pic.twitter.com/yCPHA3e7Zi
— The Missing Data Depot (@data_depot) January 13, 2023
You can sort through the responses here.
A reader writes:
Steve,
We’ll that was depressing! When I saw the tweet on gender, I thought well we know how many rednecks there are. Looking at the data, that’s maybe not that off.First, being conservative, then religious affiliation, were the most important factors in being open to hearing that view. For example, being Mormon was better than being Catholic, but attending Notre Dame was better than Brigham Young. Explicitly conservative Christian Hillsdale was the only college to have a majority comfortable and somewhat comfortable.
Race was more interesting to me: The Aspirational vs The Secure (less anxiety, not about actually doing well or not). I’m sure there’s a lot of overlap with political party, but the Asians!
As far as women… Appealing to women is a waste of time. We’re submissive and value stability. Unfortunately, the strong horse steering our secular society is psychotic…but it’s still the strong horse.
These graphs follow up in more detail on allowing a speaker to come on campus who says “Transgender people have mental disorders.”
On the question of allowing free speech on World War T, the most liberal college (strongly support plus somewhat support) is explicitly conservative Hillsdale:
Conversely, the most strongly opposed student bodies to free speech regarding transgender claims tend to be women’s and rich kids’ schools in the Northeast:
By the way, psychiatrist Scott Alexander recently wrote about how the DSM-V manual has to classify “gender dysphoria” as more or less of a mental disorder in order from patients to qualify for insurance subsidization of their “gender-affirming care.” But then everybody in the profession has to act like it’s the greatest thing ever or not get canceled.
In contrast, homosexuality is NOT an official disorder because, while “transition therapy” is GOOD and must be paid for by insurance, “conversion therapy” is BAD and must never ever occur.
Got that?
Scott writes:
Consider: does the DSM classify transgender as a mental disorder? Hard to say. It includes 302.85: Gender Dysphoria, defined as “a marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender”. It also includes approximately one million caveats saying that transgender definitely isn’t a mental disorder. Why the contradiction? Because regardless of the philosophical definition of mental disorder, the practical definition is:
If you call something a mental disorder, insurance has to cover treatment for it, which is good.
But if you call something a mental disorder, people will accuse you of trying to stigmatize them, which is bad.
The DSM writers are trans-friendly and want to make sure trans people can get the care they need (for example, in most states, people need a psych evaluation before they can get gender affirmation surgery), so they want to force insurance companies to cover transgender, so they have to include it. But they also don’t want to stigmatize trans people, so they also include a lot of paragraphs about how even though they just listed it as a mental disorder, it definitely isn’t a mental disorder.
(a common claim is that the DSM says transgender itself is not a mental disorder, but the distress it produces is. This doesn’t seem especially destigmatizing to me – you’re the wrong gender, but you’re crazy for being unhappy about it? Also, I can’t find support for this distinction in a literal reading of the DSM criteria themselves)
When the DSM is political, it’s not (just) because the authors are ideologues and want to go around stigmatizing people they don’t like. It’s because “is X a mental disorder or not?” is scientifically meaningless but politically very important.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Of course they do.
Off-topic
California Housing Gotterdammerung
https://darrellowens.substack.com/p/ca-cities-to-lose-all-zoning-powers
They eventually came for the home equity of the people who were keeping population growth away from their neighborhoods (while voting for it to be in other people’s neighborhoods).
This is very good for people making six figures while living like the homeless because of very high prices. But I can empathize with the existing property owners. And the diversity will also flow in, I guess.
This was a big step in the loss of our National Sovereignty -- and now Bidet and his accomplices are putting US in further surrender mode by their likely signing of the WHO 'treaty' by the US and other Nations that will also surrender their sovereignty to a slew of unelected bureaucrats in a land far, far away.
The NIMBY crew could have played a better game: they should have controlled the border and not made illegal aliens a protected class. Looks like they may have avoided Bangladesh and jumped straight to Kowloon city.
It’s almost like normal people don’t want fringe lunatics in their common spaces. Take notes, Republicans!
None of this would be happening had we banned females from universities years ago.
Except to cook. And Clean. And uh… decorate.
Ban the tradesmen who are skeptical of BLM and transgenderism from the campus as well, then wonder why the lights are off, the toilets don’t flush, and the walkways are covered in snow & ice.
Pew’s been saying this for years–their surveys show it without exception. Women and young people generally are violently opposed to the notion that people who disagree with them should be permitted to speak.
The (many) topics for which these strictures are to be enforced are supplied to them by the mass media and secondarily, the Institutions. This is a vision of our society’s future, for anyone who cares to notice. It’s almost here already.
For fun, I sometimes enjoy pointing out to these people that they’re 100% in lockstep with corporate media, owned by billionaires. No exceptions! They look at me like I have two heads. Only freaks would look elsewhere for the news!
https://www.unz.com/isteve/unsurprising-memphis/#comment-5791870
This is why I support trannies in women’s sports. Not only do these coeds get what they ask for, it puts a dagger in the heart of Title IX. Two great outcomes in my view
The survey question wasn’t asking what’s purported/implied in that tweet.
The actual survey asked about (a) freedom of speech (b) to advocate leftist ideals on campus. So leftists naturally support their own ideas and conservatives split (some are pro freedom of speech, some censor).
What really needed to be asked is the converse of both (a) and (b): Do you support censorship of conservative ideals on campuses.
That would show the “interesting” thing.
Woke-ists: Ban those who refuse to conform to the Jewish-promoted agendas such as BLM and trans-madness.
Conservatives: Ban those who point out Jewish Power’s key role in movements like BLM and LGBTQ.
Solid majority of Republicans want to ban BDS and Palestinian voices even though Palestinians never caused harm to US whites and conservatives. Republicans want to do this in service to Jews who are the main force behind censoring white voices.
A retarded country.
And GOP is totally silent about the Colorado Christian baker who’s being sued out of existence because he refuses to bake a satanic tranny cake.
Whether woke or conservative, it all boils down to submit to or appease Jewish power.
It would be interesting to know how many students would support a speaker coming to campus and endorsing the vastly more controversial but also apparently true claims by Ron Unz that Jews are the biggest per capita murderers in human history and that a significant portion of religious Jews are Satanists.
Medicine in general and psychiatry in particular are one big insurance grift. It’s all about checking boxes to get paid the most for doing the least. Why would any profit-seeking medical practice do anything different?
It is interesting, though, that nobody recognizes that insurance is just a form of privatized socialism. And that mandatory and highly regulated insurance is just plain-old government socialism with a middle-man. All of our crazy waste and misallocation of medical resources is just an example of the universal constant that everyone makes poor cost-benefit decisions when they are spending other people’s money instead of their own.
Counter point.
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn’t been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they’ll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I’m sure the data is there. It’ll just take some time to find.
I suspect that today's conservative boomers were never campus radicals to begin with. Radicals were a small fraction of college students anyway, and when it comes to older boomers, most didn't go off to college at all.Replies: @Jim Don Bob
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theoryReplies: @Feryl
It looks like 70 percent or so of undergraduates think the idea that transgender people are mentally ill is beyond the pale. But that idea seems clearly true, and really shouldn’t be controversial.
It would be interesting to know how many students would support a speaker coming to campus and endorsing the vastly more controversial but also apparently true claims by Ron Unz that Jews are the biggest per capita murderers in human history and that a significant portion of religious Jews are Satanists.
This is (one of the many reasons) why conservative civic nationalist whites are losing and losing badly. They bring a debate podium to a religious war.
I’d make fun of them, but there’s no joy in mocking the retarded.
I blame Marxism, French thinkers and — when I want to spice things up — the Jews. I definitely don’t see this as the inevitable continuation of two core projects of Anglo-American progressives: feminism and uplifting the Negro / coloured people / the Black man / people of colour . That would be blaming the victim or engaging in ethnic self-hatred or something. Our bossy, know-it-all WASP neighbours dindu nothin’.
Yes capitalism prefers to inhabit a society filled with lifelong spoilt brats and narcissists; AKA consumers. Christianity, Islam and Marxism-Leninism demand discipline and sacrifice from their followers. Consumer capitalists celebrate and flatter whatever grubby little thing a consumer is willing to pay for, as long as it doesn’t get the seller into legal trouble.
No, @MissingDataDepot#Dumbass, men are 108% more supportive than women in this sample. The difference is 25 percentage points. Talk about your innumerate sons of bitches …
Anyway, the problem is not with men, women, or non-binaries. The problem is with college students. Shut ’em down, and send ’em home!
That out of my system, I’ll check out the data. Thanks for putting this together, Steve.
Same with the CDC. They've got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you've just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @J.Ross, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Supply and Demand
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
One of the big differences from the past is that homeownership and family formation-two major drivers of conservatism-are down.
Indeed, one of these lefties pointed out that polyamory can be a response to low paying jobs and longer lifespans. Don’t know about the second but a bunch of young people living in a house together to save rent would certainly seem a situation ripe for love triangles.
In real life, it's mostly really fat girls being shared by several neckbeards who have no other shot at getting laid.Replies: @Corvinus
You know it is very common to have political enemies who belong to the same ethnic group as oneself. There is no shortage of militantly atheist non-Jews. You’re missing at least half the story when you blame this stuff on the Jews and fail to discuss the rest of them.
Just wait until these DEI idiots/Jamokes are promoted into your waterworks and sewage. And flying normie airliners jets. This is when the South African style fun begins
The APA bowed to public pressure way back in 1974 and removed it from the seventh printing of DSM-II.
I suspect their sampling frame was bad.
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
No to Johnny Nervous Eater…. Too many drugs like Ritalin in their misbegotten yuffs.
The DSM writers are trans-friendly and want to make sure trans people can get the care they need
The care they need is for doctors to tell them to get lost and for their families to tell them that they’re welcome to refrain from insisting everyone participate in their cosplay. Ditto judges, school administrators, and prison wardens.
If medical treatment reduces distress, then the condition being treated is a disorder.
We’re to believe that transgenderism has always been with us, and perfectly healthy, but requires medical treatments that have only recently been developed.
It’s obviously nuts.
I remember someone said banning abortion would make women “saner” for some reason. Heck of job it did!
So much for that.
While this is obviously bad, I am going to at least be partially understanding of this position – people who feel insecure tend to be the most interested in rendering judgment and enforcing their morality (favorable to them, of course) on others if it gains them social approval. Most women, whether they will admit it or not, want to feel safe and taken care of and there are a slew of social phenomena in our society today that makes them feel the opposite.
The leftist ideal of a woman living her best life is generally not in a long term committed relationship, she’s out banging like a sailor on shore leave because she is told that’s liberating, despite it going against her inherent nature. She’s also working like a dog – which means like a man with a family to support – because having a career is prized over traditional womanhood and having a family. Telling women this is what they have to look forward to probably induces anxiety that they don’t even recognize is there. Most live alone and often in urban areas, where the blessings of diversity mean every walk home at the end of the night means being a potential low-risk target. The same is true for many college campuses and this also wears on people whether they consciously recognized it or not.
Last but not least is the resentment towards society and men that is drilled into them throughout their time in school, particularly intense in the liberal arts milieu where they are surrounded by people whose very job is to inculcate these feelings – indeed, their success and professional advancement depends on it, and the targets/students better repeat the sacred oaths back to avoid social ostracism or a hard time academically.
We basically have a society that emotionally and socially abuses a huge swathe of the population to satisfy gods invented by academia.
Still troubling that we are prone to damaging, cult-like beliefs. I like to think that truth and basic survival instincts will prevail, but we are quite happy to sterilize and carve up our bodies, and promote such.Replies: @Arclight
I myself think there's great opportunity in our society for women to enjoy both stable, traditional motherhood, and an exciting, educated single life. But it requires lots of careful maturity and sobriety. These girls need plenty of fatherly, avuncular male professors in their schools, and they're likely getting way too many female ones.Replies: @Arclight
University systems are rogue institutions at this point: ungoverned and ungovernable. They are in this strange limbo-land where they’re non-profits, state-entities but not really answerable to the executive or legislature unless they exert themselves, and all sorts of byzantine, quasi-judicial procedures. So you’ve got athletic departments telling women they’ve just got to put up with naked men in their locker rooms, tenured academics on the teat poisoning young adults against the society that lavishes such largesse on them, and paid hos for the footsball team, to ferry them to strip clubs. Nobody really knows how to regulate them because they’re a kind of regulatory, executive power-wielding entity in their own right, and there’s no market discipline over them.
Same with the CDC. They’ve got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you’ve just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.
In America, it is essential for universities to stand loud and proud against the white, rural, minority that wishes to destroy them -- and I would actually prefer them to increase their bile against white people to reach an absolute fever pitch. Think "voluntary" sterilization centers in which white males are encouraged to get vasectomies by BIPOC peers.
I suspect that this will require the final retirement of all the tenured boomers, however. Millennials will carry that banner well when it comes their time to rule the roost.Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
Back in the day, after dinner, the ladies would retire to the drawing room (their safe space) while the men took brandy, lit cigars, and discussed the news of the day, a society scandal, or the latest political tract. Our forefathers knew that women are too emotional and irrational to handle controversial issues.
Same with the CDC. They've got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you've just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @J.Ross, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Supply and Demand
I’m not even sure you’d have to steamroll that Constitution, A-G. Just pull the US Feral Gov’t loan guarantees, which are themselves unConstitutional, and see who could afford all that shit anymore.
But, yes, not matter how, these Institutions need to be terminated with extreme prejudice.
Hoho, absolutely without question! The problem as I see it, however, is that to do so would require the assent of the majority of Americans because I am certain that they are fed up with all this crap. But they need a megaphone, and the current system is rigged to subvert that very prospect. Forget Carlson, Sailer etc., not enough of the rest of the public is paying attention.
So the way to substantially reduce the number of “transitions” and cut the heart out of “gender affirming care” would be to agree that transgenderism isn’t a mental illness. And therefore, it shouldn’t be covered by insurance. Anyone still interested in “transitioning” can then pay for these procedures out of their own pocket.
That would, very quickly, be the end of that.
This all tracks nicely with what I’ve been saying about today’s journalism, as these female undergrads go on to become today’s journalists
Muslims just a hair better than Hindus?
Same with the CDC. They've got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you've just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @J.Ross, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Supply and Demand
This is why I groan when braindead zombie “conservatives” (who enjoy losing) discuss student loans exclusively in terms of personal responsibility (such as the banks failed to demonstrate in having allowed a loan they knew was never going to be paid back). The universities are our enemy. Canceling student debt as odious (eg, in cases where the student was unable to enter the field studied for) would hurt our enemy. Fair? Actually, yes, cancelling odious debt is fair. But forget fair. It would hurt our enemy. Such hurt, it might shock universities into being universities again. Do you want to hurt your enemy, who is hurting you? Do you want universities to be places of learning and not places of brainwashing? “No no no look here sonny you need to learn about personal responsibility because it will serve you well in the housing market which I have generously locked you out of.” We deserve our suffering. God told us everything we had to do, and we were all like, “sure, we’ll get right on that, man, but at the moment we’re working on this cow statue.”
"Cuckservative" was a meme and like all memes had a lifespan but it remains as fitting now as it was then.Replies: @Anonymous
No, the way to hurt them is to cancel the loan PROGRAMS.
Secondly, it's up to actual individuals (parents) to fight back by not joining the corrupt system. I do get engineering and computer degrees requiring a lot of learning, but most parents ought to wise up and not send their children to indoctrination camps. I mean, come on, many of them come back home with the idea their parents are racist scum and they will hate them for years. So, let's see, do I want to sign my name to back up a loan for THAT CRAP?
A big advantage rich kids have over uncultured, very smart white boys from middle America is that the rich kids are taught how to survive in corporate America. Whether the parents agree with it or not, wealthy coastal employees know that they must raise their kids to wholeheartedly embrace gays and trans. The kids are taught to never question the qualifications of obvious affirmative action admits and hires.
Lots of smart, hard working white boys never get their chance in corporate America because they don’t have these instincts.
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
The far left is actually an odd mix of boomers and under 24s.
Just look at any anti-abortion protest.
You’ll notice a disproportionate amount of fuzzy headed boomer spinsters and overweight blue haired 20 year olds that are at no risk of getting pregnant.
It took me a while to process irony, TBH.
For that matter our local democrat party has lately started using the "We're not going back!" phrase, too. It would seem to me that a skilled republican candidate could turn that one on its head really quickly: "Personally, I'd like to go back to low crime and low inflation"... "I wouldn't want to go back to prison, either" etc etc.
Who cares? Let America collapse under the giant elephant turd of Wokeness. At least if the China takes over, California will get high speed rail in three years.
Same with the CDC. They've got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you've just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @J.Ross, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Supply and Demand
De Santis seems to be making progress with Florida universities. If you cut off their $ they become amazingly compliant with the common sense that eluded them previously.
Among prestigious schools, Notre Dame, Dartmouth, Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie Mellon at least appear to have a core of free speech defenders, though not a majority.Replies: @Art Deco
It looks like 70 percent or so of undergraduates think the idea that transgender people are mentally ill is beyond the pale. But that idea is clearly true, and it’s really bizarre that it’s controversial.
It would be interesting to know how many students would support a speaker coming to campus and endorsing the vastly more controversial but also apparently true claims by Ron Unz that Jews are the biggest per capita murderers in human history and that a significant portion of religious Jews are Satanists.
Yeah, that’s why (99%) of you deserve no respect. Pathetic.
If the US wasn’t such a neanderthal backwater, trannies wouldn’t need a gender dysphoria diagnosis from a quack pseudo-medical professional. In Scotland, the PM vows to fight for Our Bodies Our Choice.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/scotlands-leader-plans-take-british-government-court-scottish-gender-transformation-law
“Scotland’s leader said Tuesday she will take the British government to court over its decision to block a Scottish law that makes it easier for people to change their gender on official documents.
..Hailed as a landmark by transgender rights activists, the bill would allow people age 16 or older in Scotland to change the gender designation on their identity documents by self-declaration, removing the need for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.”
But wait – trouble in Paradise.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/scotland-changes-policy-sending-transgender-inmates-female-prison-report
“After facing pressure to intervene in the transfer of a transgender convicted rapist to an all-women’s prison, Scotland’s government has decided to stop transferring such inmates with a history of violence against women to its all-female prison, according to reports.
Justice warns against stigmatizing transgender women as threat against women, adding, ‘predatory men are the risk to women’ ”
How does the PM square the circle? Let’s find out.
Off-topic
California Housing Gotterdammerung
https://darrellowens.substack.com/p/ca-cities-to-lose-all-zoning-powers
They eventually came for the home equity of the people who were keeping population growth away from their neighborhoods (while voting for it to be in other people's neighborhoods).This is very good for people making six figures while living like the homeless because of very high prices. But I can empathize with the existing property owners. And the diversity will also flow in, I guess.Replies: @Anthony Aaron, @bomag
When Trump’s predecessor was in office, not only did he push to have HUD tenants moved into suburban neighborhoods, but he signed on with the UN push to increase density and discourage housing in the suburbs and the rural areas … totally surrendering our National Sovereignty to that agenda, among others, that was part of the Paris ‘Climate’ Accords and the sub-agendas, including ‘sustainable development’ …
This was a big step in the loss of our National Sovereignty — and now Bidet and his accomplices are putting US in further surrender mode by their likely signing of the WHO ‘treaty’ by the US and other Nations that will also surrender their sovereignty to a slew of unelected bureaucrats in a land far, far away.
Lets get real here. White women HATE HATE HATE White men, traditional culture, Christianity, and their heritage. Not all, but the overwhelming majority so that it makes no difference that there are a few who do not. Those are so few in number that they don’t count. Any man who spends any time around White women knows this.
White women have ALWAYS been the eternal, natural enemy of the White man. Because while White men have been ever more selected for beta male cooperativeness, which produces ever richer societies that are ever deadlier in war, White women HAVE NOT been selected to find that sexy. On the contrary, there has been ZERO selection pressure on White women other than beauty. Thus they find the White men around them rage-inducing, being unsexy and beta male and cooperative. Lady tingle killers. Its why White women, Asian women, mostly don’t reproduce in captivity: aka modernity where they have reproductive control and don’t need an invested male provider for both protection and provision. Asian women are much the same, at least in NE Asia. White and NE Asian women have found their men so unsexy they don’t want kids with them.
Black women, well they do reproduce in captivity: modernity. Black TFR is still much, much higher than Whites and is still just a bit above replacement in White countries, through the roof in Africa. Even or especially in urban areas.
Anyone remotely familiar with White women know they find gays endless fascinating, trannies even more so, hate with a passion nearly all White men, and find blacks fascinating as gays and trannies. Oprah and Michelle Obama have made enormous amounts of money being the pretend black girlfriend of every White woman, and Kim Kardashian is their dream proxy banging rappers and basketball Americans.
This is just how it is. Islam is right about women.
Still not enough negroes in Utah.
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/01/med-school-went-woke-after-pressure-from-accreditor-documents-show/
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
I haven’t noticed any rightward trend, over the last forty years, among my leftist college classmates. They were idiots then and they’re still idiots today.
I suspect that today’s conservative boomers were never campus radicals to begin with. Radicals were a small fraction of college students anyway, and when it comes to older boomers, most didn’t go off to college at all.
I knew a girl in high school whose younger brother was always spouting commie nonsense. His father laughed and called him "Little Lenin". It wasn't so funny when he and others bombed a building at the University of Wisconsin killing a graduate student. He then went on the lam with other members of the Weather Underground.
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/08/three-years-of-intense-protest-activity.html
This bodes ill for the future USA.
It may be said, in all fairness and candor, that the modern USA is a society run by women for women. If you scoff at me, just take a quick look at the local Walmart etc when you are out shopping next, and gauge from the cornucopia and volume of products on display just who,s got the spending power. Similarly just take a glance at the the garbage on TV and think to yourself just who is all this garbage offered to?, or even the USA’s obsession with such trivial filth and garbage as the Kardashians, LA ‘celebrity’ culture and all the rest of the tiresome boring infantile trash.
Not only are American women giving employment preference, but there is a more or less open movement to earmark all the really big decision making jobs for them. Also, consider that the service based US economy, of a nation largely shorn of its butch primary and secondary industries is more or less a tailor made power structure to entrench female supremacy.
The irony is, of course, that the transgender bandwagon is the most direct and obvious attack on the interests of biological women you can possibly conceive of – in exactly the same way massive third world immigration is the biggest possible attack against genetic Europeans.
That biological women, in the main, are gullible enough not merely just to accepting, but actively fight *for* it speaks volumes for the suggestibility and docile nature of the female mind.
Regarding the male college student vs. female college student disparate mindsets on cultural issues, when “the biological imperative” came calling, the male would seldom be honest with the female. I am old, and maybe this has changed.
I happened to be passing the local elementary school at dismissal yesterday and ended up behind a car with a pink Planned Parenthood “We’re Not Going Back” bumper sticker. There was a white-haired lady driving, and a young kid in the back seat. Presumably a grandkid getting picked up at school by Grandma.
It took me a while to process irony, TBH.
For that matter our local democrat party has lately started using the “We’re not going back!” phrase, too. It would seem to me that a skilled republican candidate could turn that one on its head really quickly: “Personally, I’d like to go back to low crime and low inflation”… “I wouldn’t want to go back to prison, either” etc etc.
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
Absolutely. The vast majority of them will become parents. They will move to lily-white suburbs and quietly realize that it’s not a good idea for grown men to use the bathroom with their eight-year-old daughters.
Off-topic
California Housing Gotterdammerung
https://darrellowens.substack.com/p/ca-cities-to-lose-all-zoning-powers
They eventually came for the home equity of the people who were keeping population growth away from their neighborhoods (while voting for it to be in other people's neighborhoods).This is very good for people making six figures while living like the homeless because of very high prices. But I can empathize with the existing property owners. And the diversity will also flow in, I guess.Replies: @Anthony Aaron, @bomag
Wondering if the courts will intervene.
The NIMBY crew could have played a better game: they should have controlled the border and not made illegal aliens a protected class. Looks like they may have avoided Bangladesh and jumped straight to Kowloon city.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/scotlands-leader-plans-take-british-government-court-scottish-gender-transformation-law
"Scotland’s leader said Tuesday she will take the British government to court over its decision to block a Scottish law that makes it easier for people to change their gender on official documents.
..Hailed as a landmark by transgender rights activists, the bill would allow people age 16 or older in Scotland to change the gender designation on their identity documents by self-declaration, removing the need for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria."
But wait - trouble in Paradise.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/scotland-changes-policy-sending-transgender-inmates-female-prison-report
"After facing pressure to intervene in the transfer of a transgender convicted rapist to an all-women’s prison, Scotland’s government has decided to stop transferring such inmates with a history of violence against women to its all-female prison, according to reports.
Justice warns against stigmatizing transgender women as threat against women, adding, 'predatory men are the risk to women' "
How does the PM square the circle? Let's find out.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1620051699900755970Replies: @JR Ewing
Government support and endorsement of Trans Insanity is just like mask mandates and vaccine mandates and open borders. They don’t actually believe it themselves, but it’s an effective way to stick a thumb in the eye of their political enemies so they’ll tolerate it and pretend they agree with it. They’d rather burn everything to the ground than admit that their opponents are right about anything.
Maybe run that by the family of Taylor Force.
I’d like to see some source for that. Republicans typically want to set state-level policies about how state agencies and their contractors react with regard to BDS, which is a legitimate government function. I am not aware of any efforts, certainly not successful ones, to ban anti-Israel speakers from college campuses.
Marxism demands that its followers sacrifice for the good of society. What is good for society is decided by the political leaders at the top and what they decide ends up being what is good for them. It is better if individuals are allowed to engage in mutually beneficial voluntary relationships. This country was founded on the belief that individuals have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and these rights can’t be taken away by a tyrant, including one claiming to represent some sort of general will.
The adage “Africa wins again” is a solid truism for our age.
I thought the claim was that allowing abortion would make women saner.
So much for that.
Except to cook. And Clean. And uh… decorate.Replies: @Prester John
A few days ago I started to thinking that there is an eerie parallel between the increasing volume of female college students (I believe they represent the majority of students) and the rise of such as BLM, “gender issues” and all the other debris that accompanies the ongoing slide into decadence. What was once deviant is now mainstream. Take heart though, because it won’t last.
The leftist ideal of a woman living her best life is generally not in a long term committed relationship, she's out banging like a sailor on shore leave because she is told that's liberating, despite it going against her inherent nature. She's also working like a dog - which means like a man with a family to support - because having a career is prized over traditional womanhood and having a family. Telling women this is what they have to look forward to probably induces anxiety that they don't even recognize is there. Most live alone and often in urban areas, where the blessings of diversity mean every walk home at the end of the night means being a potential low-risk target. The same is true for many college campuses and this also wears on people whether they consciously recognized it or not.
Last but not least is the resentment towards society and men that is drilled into them throughout their time in school, particularly intense in the liberal arts milieu where they are surrounded by people whose very job is to inculcate these feelings - indeed, their success and professional advancement depends on it, and the targets/students better repeat the sacred oaths back to avoid social ostracism or a hard time academically.
We basically have a society that emotionally and socially abuses a huge swathe of the population to satisfy gods invented by academia.Replies: @bomag, @Anon
That was good.
Still troubling that we are prone to damaging, cult-like beliefs. I like to think that truth and basic survival instincts will prevail, but we are quite happy to sterilize and carve up our bodies, and promote such.
You’re pretending that we can’t import tradesmen with more compliant ideologies.
Same with the CDC. They've got a bunch of bugs in their arsenal, and are already weaponizing them.
When an institution goes rogue, you've just got to burn it to the ground, salt the earth, and move on. That means a strongman shows up and harnesses populist energy and just steamrolls over the Constitution, or the Constitution is a death pact. Interesting times.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @J.Ross, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Supply and Demand
Universities were always ungovernable institutions that were at best separated from executive authority of the state or commune. The University of Bologna hired Italian condottieri (mercenaries) to use against the Guelph faction in the city well into the 16th century, and the University of Paris preferred Burgundian rule to the Valois Dauphin and agitated on behalf of Charles the Bold right up until his death.
In America, it is essential for universities to stand loud and proud against the white, rural, minority that wishes to destroy them — and I would actually prefer them to increase their bile against white people to reach an absolute fever pitch. Think “voluntary” sterilization centers in which white males are encouraged to get vasectomies by BIPOC peers.
I suspect that this will require the final retirement of all the tenured boomers, however. Millennials will carry that banner well when it comes their time to rule the roost.
“…these Institutions need to be terminated with extreme prejudice.”
Hoho, absolutely without question! The problem as I see it, however, is that to do so would require the assent of the majority of Americans because I am certain that they are fed up with all this crap. But they need a megaphone, and the current system is rigged to subvert that very prospect. Forget Carlson, Sailer etc., not enough of the rest of the public is paying attention.
White women have ALWAYS been the eternal, natural enemy of the White man. Because while White men have been ever more selected for beta male cooperativeness, which produces ever richer societies that are ever deadlier in war, White women HAVE NOT been selected to find that sexy. On the contrary, there has been ZERO selection pressure on White women other than beauty. Thus they find the White men around them rage-inducing, being unsexy and beta male and cooperative. Lady tingle killers. Its why White women, Asian women, mostly don't reproduce in captivity: aka modernity where they have reproductive control and don't need an invested male provider for both protection and provision. Asian women are much the same, at least in NE Asia. White and NE Asian women have found their men so unsexy they don't want kids with them.
Black women, well they do reproduce in captivity: modernity. Black TFR is still much, much higher than Whites and is still just a bit above replacement in White countries, through the roof in Africa. Even or especially in urban areas.
Anyone remotely familiar with White women know they find gays endless fascinating, trannies even more so, hate with a passion nearly all White men, and find blacks fascinating as gays and trannies. Oprah and Michelle Obama have made enormous amounts of money being the pretend black girlfriend of every White woman, and Kim Kardashian is their dream proxy banging rappers and basketball Americans.
This is just how it is. Islam is right about women.Replies: @TWS
You’re around the bend so far you can’t see reality from your zip code.
We get it, you think women hate white men. Serious question; do you know any actual women?
I mean other than those on TV and movies. TV commercials are not real life.
Those numbers are pretty shocking for the female undergrads, the men seem to have at least a decent percentage who are sane (though not a majority). Remember, much of the increase in “LGBTQ” identifying young people is due to women claiming to be bisexual or queer but who are basically straight in their actions. It’s trendy.
Women go with who they perceive are the winners. To change their minds to the right things, you have to be looked at as a winner. As more states crack down on the gender theory stuff in schools, we’ll hopefully see those numbers get better.
I know you’re being amusing, but these “love groups” that people fantasize about always turn into hate and revenge groups. The last thing we all need are more bitter, spiteful people looking for revenge against all the lies they were told.
De Santis added some real conservatives to the board of the woke New College and they just fired the president. This guy had some further suggestions.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2023-1-26-some-suggestions-for-christopher-rufo-and-company-to-fix-new-college-of-florida
Imagine what DJT could have accomplished were he half the executive that Ron is. And, yes, I know governors have much more power, but too many times DJT was content to tweet rather than sign a few executive orders.
The leftist ideal of a woman living her best life is generally not in a long term committed relationship, she's out banging like a sailor on shore leave because she is told that's liberating, despite it going against her inherent nature. She's also working like a dog - which means like a man with a family to support - because having a career is prized over traditional womanhood and having a family. Telling women this is what they have to look forward to probably induces anxiety that they don't even recognize is there. Most live alone and often in urban areas, where the blessings of diversity mean every walk home at the end of the night means being a potential low-risk target. The same is true for many college campuses and this also wears on people whether they consciously recognized it or not.
Last but not least is the resentment towards society and men that is drilled into them throughout their time in school, particularly intense in the liberal arts milieu where they are surrounded by people whose very job is to inculcate these feelings - indeed, their success and professional advancement depends on it, and the targets/students better repeat the sacred oaths back to avoid social ostracism or a hard time academically.
We basically have a society that emotionally and socially abuses a huge swathe of the population to satisfy gods invented by academia.Replies: @bomag, @Anon
Great comment. I forwarded it to some young women I know. We’ll see what the response is.
I myself think there’s great opportunity in our society for women to enjoy both stable, traditional motherhood, and an exciting, educated single life. But it requires lots of careful maturity and sobriety. These girls need plenty of fatherly, avuncular male professors in their schools, and they’re likely getting way too many female ones.
I suspect that today's conservative boomers were never campus radicals to begin with. Radicals were a small fraction of college students anyway, and when it comes to older boomers, most didn't go off to college at all.Replies: @Jim Don Bob
Good points, all. I was there when there were demonstrations and building takeovers and such. I thought it was stupid then and still do.
I knew a girl in high school whose younger brother was always spouting commie nonsense. His father laughed and called him “Little Lenin”. It wasn’t so funny when he and others bombed a building at the University of Wisconsin killing a graduate student. He then went on the lam with other members of the Weather Underground.
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/08/three-years-of-intense-protest-activity.html
DeSantis has some work to do in making University of Florida a conservative school. Surprisingly poor support for free speech there.
Among prestigious schools, Notre Dame, Dartmouth, Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie Mellon at least appear to have a core of free speech defenders, though not a majority.
Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie MellonJerelyn Luther University.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVRd99oZTo8Replies: @Jack P
Agreed. Video games are one of the few spaces not yet fully wokified and a good place to reach young men unhappy with the regime.
Horses don’t steer. No matter how strong they are.
The care they need is for doctors to tell them to get lost and for their families to tell them that they're welcome to refrain from insisting everyone participate in their cosplay. Ditto judges, school administrators, and prison wardens.Replies: @fish
Enjoy your hobby! Don’t try and involve us, either from a payment or general discussion perspective!
Not to mention they’re nepo babies.
It’s a fine case of having your cake and eating it too.
(While forcing your baker to bake said cake for you, to dilate things a bit.)
But how far is late 20th and early 21st century America from the America of the Founding Fathers? How far is our consumer capitalism from living in a country that wanted to be made up of financially independent gentleman farmers and craftsmen? Let’s be realistic about how far we’ve strayed from that. What I’m saying applies to the rest of the Anglosphere, of course.
I like to think of myself as thoroughly red-pilled, but one thing I’ve been reluctant to acknowledge:
And that is the premise that White women are more susceptible to White guilt, and more likely to respond by engaging in self-destructive behavior.
Well… I’ve got to admit it’s true.
Among prestigious schools, Notre Dame, Dartmouth, Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie Mellon at least appear to have a core of free speech defenders, though not a majority.Replies: @Art Deco
Notre Dame, Dartmouth,
Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie MellonJerelyn Luther University.
Back in the 60s & 70s, college campuses were hotbeds of radicalism. However, those idealistic & crazy hippies became more conservative with age. Now those Boomers are mostly Republicans.
Could a similar dynamic occur with the current generations of Millennials and Zoomers?
There must be some study that tracks the ideological/political trajectory of generations as they age. Are the Millennials and Zoomers on the same trajectory as the Boomers and Generation Xers?
While Zoomers are young enough that sufficient data hasn't been gathered, Millennials are in their 30s. We can compare their voting pattern in the 2000s to the current year. Then we could see whether Boomers and Generation Xers demonstrated the same change back decades ago. Then we could adjust the voting patterns of Zoomers to figure out where they'll be in the next 10-15 years down the road.
I'm sure the data is there. It'll just take some time to find.Replies: @SFG, @Clyde, @John Johnson, @International Jew, @cool daddy jimbo, @Another Canadian
Neil Howe has done a lot of work studying generational characteristics back to colonial times.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theory
Early Gen X is also quite Republican, although they are a smaller generation than late Boomers and have been less likely to be politically engaged than older generations. Late Gen X over-laps to a large degree with later generations. The large generation of right wing late Boomers+early Gen X is highly responsible for all the crap talked about people under the age of 50 (remember that back in the 90's, we started to hear that each generation would be worse than the previous one, and starting with late Gen X in the 90's young people themselves popularized nihilism about young people being stupid and destructive). Ironically these are the generations whose own parents were Boomers and early Gen X. Yet the parents of people born since 1973 rarely acknowledge their own culpability.
The 90's were a big cultural turning point; those born after 1973 have been shaped by that.
https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Untitled-design-6-1536x639.jpg
https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Screen-Shot-2023-02-01-at-2.35.35-PM-1536x779.png
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/01/med-school-went-woke-after-pressure-from-accreditor-documents-show/Replies: @Jack P
Every Republican governor needs to do like Ron DeSantis and ban DEI at state universities. Utah’s governor is unfortunately not cut from the same cloth…
Yale, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie MellonJerelyn Luther University.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVRd99oZTo8Replies: @Jack P
Trust me, I was surprised too. But Yale is comparatively good on that survey.
Don’t forget – It’s also very funny and not only in sports. That deaf spork singing ‘I will always love you’ at a beauty pageant while people were trying to keep a straight face was one of the funniest things I ever saw
Still troubling that we are prone to damaging, cult-like beliefs. I like to think that truth and basic survival instincts will prevail, but we are quite happy to sterilize and carve up our bodies, and promote such.Replies: @Arclight
The reality is that people are a) generally inherently religions, and b) sheep. Most people are unwilling to openly go against the grain, and unless you have a job where you are largely immune to the opinions of others and the consequences of social disapproval, it’s also for good reason.
But too often leadership lives off disdain and contempt for the underlings.
My psychiatrist neighbor said the reason the psychiatric profession caved in on the issue of whether homosexuality was a disorder was to get the homosexual lobby to quit bothering them. He still maintained that homosexuality was a disorder.
lll
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-pop-culture/new-film-chronicles-fight-remove-homosexualitys-mental-disorder-label-rcna2824Not to go all Thomas Szasz on you, but the whole "mental disorder" thing may be the source of the problem. They labeled it as such in 1952, but did a 180° a few years after the Alinder riot. If it's that sensitive to outside political trends, is it really science?
The Catholic Church is on far sounder footing by calling it a moral disorder. They haven't budged.
…more men and fewer women on campus.
In America, it is essential for universities to stand loud and proud against the white, rural, minority that wishes to destroy them -- and I would actually prefer them to increase their bile against white people to reach an absolute fever pitch. Think "voluntary" sterilization centers in which white males are encouraged to get vasectomies by BIPOC peers.
I suspect that this will require the final retirement of all the tenured boomers, however. Millennials will carry that banner well when it comes their time to rule the roost.Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
You’re literally demon-possessed.
Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
Sounds pretty dog bites man (chicks are more liberal and liberals like censoring).
The part about the DSM is interesting. But seems to be a segue. Reads like not part of the theme, but a movement to adjacent topic. Rather have it in a separate post.
I myself think there's great opportunity in our society for women to enjoy both stable, traditional motherhood, and an exciting, educated single life. But it requires lots of careful maturity and sobriety. These girls need plenty of fatherly, avuncular male professors in their schools, and they're likely getting way too many female ones.Replies: @Arclight
Thanks. I agree that women can have both of the things you mention, but the problem is that both young men and women are stretching the single/living for myself phase out well into their 30s in too many cases. By that time the pool of eligible mates has been winnowed down quite a bit, not to mention the opportunity to have one or more kids, and it’s easy for women with a decent career trajectory to talk themselves into the idea that they cannot get off the ladder too soon. I also think the fake world of social media plays a significant role in selling a lifestyle/image that is totally unattainable for 99% but many people chase far too long before realizing it’s a mirage.
Another study from the University of Duh.
College campuses are dominated by liberal White women. Liberal White women support censorship.
They either:
A. Believe their ideology is correct and thus any opposition can only be pushing propaganda
B. Are aware that their ideology requires lies and cannot withstand open debate
White undergrads normally start with A but eventually move to B if they stick with liberalism or continue on to grad school. If they meet a man in college then they are far more likely to move to
C. F-ck liberalism I’m marrying a lacrosse player who is going to be a dentist
What is next? A groundbreaking study on how it will be cold this year in Alaska?
Honestly, I think he’s just clowning. He sees all the responses TD gets and wants some of that sweet troll cred.
lllReplies: @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross
The Gay Liberation Front, led by Gary Alinder, invaded the American Psychiatric Association’s 1970 convention in– where else?– San Francisco, to lecture the doctors that they knew best.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-pop-culture/new-film-chronicles-fight-remove-homosexualitys-mental-disorder-label-rcna2824
Not to go all Thomas Szasz on you, but the whole “mental disorder” thing may be the source of the problem. They labeled it as such in 1952, but did a 180° a few years after the Alinder riot. If it’s that sensitive to outside political trends, is it really science?
The Catholic Church is on far sounder footing by calling it a moral disorder. They haven’t budged.
Sad. But it does not surprise me at all. Most young white girls are brainwashed idiots and haven’t got a clue.
In magazines, polyamory is hot people living as throuples.
In real life, it’s mostly really fat girls being shared by several neckbeards who have no other shot at getting laid.
Speaking from your experience, I see. This song must be your anthem.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VMnjF1O4eH0
OK, so if the obstetritian (thanks to some impressive foresight) assigns the baby’s gender “correctly”, i.e. matching the newborn’s future perceived gender, then the assignee does not suffer from gender dysphoria, irrespective of their biological sex, so no “gender affirming care” necessary.
lllReplies: @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross
As Reg points out, they got psy-op’d. An NPR show literally consists of the conspirators boasting of how they psych’d out the psychs during a Hawaii convention. But really, the simplest and most useful model of homosexual thought is a guy, really a kid, suffering something he does not want or enjoy, deciding he’d be able to put up with it if he were stronger, and so telling himself that he positively enjoys it, and then “proving” it by retaining the cope for the rest of his life. Like the Woody Allen joke in “Without Feathers” where a guy falls out of an opera box, but wants everyone to know that he did it deliberately, so he buys that same box for a month and falls out of it every night. Which means that, yes, it’s a disorder.
Yes, and I have a sliver of faith that leadership has some functional survival instincts and harm avoidance for its charges.
But too often leadership lives off disdain and contempt for the underlings.
De-fund colleges.
Yes. If you want a fair fight where everybody observes the rules and nobody gets hurt, maybe you should take up croquet. When you’re in a war, the only principle is victory.
“Cuckservative” was a meme and like all memes had a lifespan but it remains as fitting now as it was then.
It's just like a cuckold who can't or won't distinguish between his own children and those of other men.
Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
A surprising amount of humans live off negative energy.
You can be born stupid. Or it can be a learning process.
I don’t get this one, Mr. Ross. How would cancelling student debt hurt the U’s at all? Even MOAR loans will be given out, basically with the assumption that college is now “free”. The U’s don’t lose the money – that’s paid by the taxpayers’… children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.
No, the way to hurt them is to cancel the loan PROGRAMS.
Secondly, it’s up to actual individuals (parents) to fight back by not joining the corrupt system. I do get engineering and computer degrees requiring a lot of learning, but most parents ought to wise up and not send their children to indoctrination camps. I mean, come on, many of them come back home with the idea their parents are racist scum and they will hate them for years. So, let’s see, do I want to sign my name to back up a loan for THAT CRAP?
Canceling student debt as odious (eg, in cases where the student was unable to enter the field studied for) would hurt our enemy. Fair? Actually, yes, cancelling odious debt is fair. But forget fair. It would hurt our enemy. Such hurt, it might shock universities into being universities again.
That would be true if it was in fact held by the universities.
The debt is unfortunately held by the Federal government.
They provide the loan and the university is paid out immediately.
Thanks. I agree that women can have both of the things you mention, but the problem is that both young men and women are stretching the single/living for myself phase out well into their 30s in too many cases. By that time the pool of eligible mates has been winnowed down quite a bit, not to mention the opportunity to have one or more kid
I think the bigger problem is holding out for an ideal mate that was already taken.
I used to work with college educated liberal women and they all seemed to expect a White collar White man with some type of career path. With liberal opinions of course…but not faggy…..and should smell nice….and should … and should. They also weren’t going out and living some sex filled singles life as conservatives would assume. Most would go home to TV and a dog or cat. In fact the local bars were pretty dull given how many office buildings of White liberals were nearby. So even that singles phase is a lie.
The other problem is that people get more set in their ways if they stay single for long periods. They aren’t as open to switching denominations or accepting cats or moving to Wyoming or whatever. I’ve seen this many times with secular White men. They don’t want to marry someone religious and they also don’t want to join liberal culture. Well how many secular but not liberal women do you think are available?
I also think the fake world of social media plays a significant role in selling a lifestyle/image that is totally unattainable for 99% but many people chase far too long before realizing it’s a mirage.
The schools are a big part of it. They convince these women that they should have high standards because they are part of some enlightened class. Of course that enlightenment is just mostly anti-White and anti-mainstream indoctrination.
There has been a successful takeover by beta intellectuals of most departments. They’re not teaching anything of substance but they have expanded their numbers to where they aren’t questioned. They are like the mob and don’t care. They just get rid of anyone that asks too many questions. Anyone naturally rational isn’t going to slog through one of these social science degrees anyways. They are very feminine and centered around group think. I had to drop a Sociology class once because it was so illogical to where I would feel disoriented after the lecture. Like a brainscramble from watching a weird movie.
"Cuckservative" was a meme and like all memes had a lifespan but it remains as fitting now as it was then.Replies: @Anonymous
Yes, it’s exactly the right word to describe ‘conservatives’ who insist on being ‘even-handed’ ‘fair’ ‘impartial’ etc. in disputes between their own people and aliens.
It’s just like a cuckold who can’t or won’t distinguish between his own children and those of other men.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theoryReplies: @Feryl
The WW2 generation remained liberal throughout their lives. The Silent/Korean war generation was more conservative. Early Boomers never were consistently devoted to any particular ideology, which could change with age (e.g. many infamously grafted varying degrees of hippiedom onto a yuppified lifestyle). Moreso than any consistent ideology, early Boomers just seem flaky and narcissistic…Late Boomers have a very strong tilt toward the GOP. The GOP’s remains quite successful in many white areas due to a coalition of Silents and (slightly) lesser educated white late Boomers.
Early Gen X is also quite Republican, although they are a smaller generation than late Boomers and have been less likely to be politically engaged than older generations. Late Gen X over-laps to a large degree with later generations. The large generation of right wing late Boomers+early Gen X is highly responsible for all the crap talked about people under the age of 50 (remember that back in the 90’s, we started to hear that each generation would be worse than the previous one, and starting with late Gen X in the 90’s young people themselves popularized nihilism about young people being stupid and destructive). Ironically these are the generations whose own parents were Boomers and early Gen X. Yet the parents of people born since 1973 rarely acknowledge their own culpability.
The 90’s were a big cultural turning point; those born after 1973 have been shaped by that.
In real life, it's mostly really fat girls being shared by several neckbeards who have no other shot at getting laid.Replies: @Corvinus
“In real life, it’s mostly really fat girls being shared by several neckbeards who have no other shot at getting laid.”
Speaking from your experience, I see. This song must be your anthem.
Yes, this is a misconception from watching too much TV. Stuff like “Sex in the City” are the products of gay men, writing about their own lifestyle thinly veiled with female characters. The media promotes this because the straight men within it also wishes the young girls were as promiscuous as homosexuals. All these female pop starts have their stuff written for them by a small number of men, who transform them into these sex starved “hungry bottoms” with female plumbing. This is not really natural, or the kind of stuff young women would write if they actually were in charge of their own art.