The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
The Korean Analog?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Korean War was extremely dramatic and scary in 1950-51, even more so than the current war, but a ceasefire was reached by early 1953. Does Korea thus provide a model for ending the Ukraine War? A commenter in the New York Times offers two reasons for skepticism:

Ed Moise
Clemson, SC

Two things helped make agreement possible in Korea:

One was that, purely by luck as far as I can tell, the military stalemate happened to occur on a battle line so close to the prewar border that accepting the battle line as a new border did not make either side seem either a winner or a loser.

The other was that while the Korean War had started out as a war between two Korean governments, it had to a large extent been taken over by their outside backers. The United States was fighting China. The United States could reach a compromise settlement with China.

Today what is happening is a war of Ukraine against Russia. Zelensky cares far more about where the border ends up than Eisenhower did in 1953, and Putin cares far more about where the border ends up than Mao did in 1953. So the odds they will be able to reach a compromise are not good.

 
Hide 417 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Edwin Moise, the writer of that letter, is a historian and a professor of 20th century military history.

  2. Also, one crucial difference- both North and South Koreans belong to the same people. Not so with Ukrainians and Russians.

  3. slumber_j says:

    Zelensky cares far more about where the border ends up than Eisenhower did in 1953, and Putin cares far more about where the border ends up than Mao did in 1953. So the odds they will be able to reach a compromise are not good.

    That sounds pretty true. I’d add that prospects for a compromise would be much better if the current US administration weren’t both pouring fuel on the fire and actively militating against a negotiated settlement.

    • Agree: PhysicistDave, Coemgen, mc23
    • Thanks: Kylie
  4. AndrewR says:
    @PiltdownMan

    He’s also lying. This is a war of Russia against Anglo-dominated NATO, with the latter using Ukrainians as cannon fodder.

  5. JimDandy says:

    Yes, Zelensky has to go.

    • Agree: Gordo
  6. AndrewR says:
    @PiltdownMan

    Well, he’s obviously lying here. Exactly whom he’s trying to fool is debatable.

    Ukrainians are being used as cannon fodder by Anglo-led NATO. And many Ukrainians do seem to harbor a genocidal hatred of Russians which might mutate into a sort of long term insurgency. But this war is only tangentially about Ukraine. If NATO ended it’s support of Ukraine, the war would end in perhaps two weeks tops.

    • Agree: JimDandy
  7. @slumber_j

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears of Russian threats. Ukrainians should have gotten jets & missiles galore, ling since & Russian military facilities should have been destroyed & Russian citizens sent to shelters.

    Taking into account monumental cowardice, laziness & stupidity espoused by US, UK & other fat Western powers, perhaps the only solution is, give or take, Kotkin’s: fully integrate 80% of Ukraine into EU system & continue with harsh sanctions, perpetually escalating them, against Russia & its backers.

    Thus the result will be another Cyprus, but with Turkey & Turkish Cyprus paying the price.

    What a company: Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, India, South Africa, Brazil. Fellowshit of the stink.

  8. AndrewR says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    This is… your opinion. And also the opinion of many Ukrainians. And I suspect this war is leading many Russians to form the same opinion. I guess we could call it the narcissism of small differences. But from an outside perspective, it’s awfully hard to tell the difference between the Russians and Ukrainians.

    • Agree: Coemgen
    • Replies: @Pixo
    , @Bardon Kaldian
  9. Old Prude says:
    @slumber_j

    prospects for a compromise would be much better if the current US administration weren’t both pouring fuel on the fire and actively militating against a negotiated settlement.

    Agree. No nation in the world is profiting from this war. Some corporations and some individuals certainly are, but not humanity. That a negotiated settlement isn’t even under serious discussion tells us how humanity stacks up against corporations and some individuals.

    • Agree: Corn, TWS
  10. News reports were that the Kievan regime and Moscow were close to an agreement last spring but that BoJo brought word from the Hegemon killing the agreement.

    The neocons and the military-industrial complex need this war. The neocons think it will improve their domestic position and they also have fantasies of bringing about a “color revolution” in Moscow and bringing Russia under their control. And big bucks are flowing to the military-industrial complex to replace the arms transferred to Ukraine.

    In fact, as the recent Chinese-mediated agreement between Iran and the Saudis illustrates, the major beneficiary is the PRC, maybe even to the point that they will feel free to move on Taiwan (I think Xi is more cautious than that, but I am far from certain). A PRC move on Taiwan would of course either bring war with the US, which the US would lose catastrophically (good-bye, Pacific Fleet!), or the US would stay out, which would completely destroy US prestige world-wide.

    The very few Western reporters who actually go to the front report that Russian artillery rounds overwhelm Kievan rounds by roughly 10 to 1. Since WW I, modern warfare has been artillery warfare, and the rule of thumb is that the kill ratio roughly tracks the number of rounds fired.

    And, accordingly, Western reporters who get to the front report that Kievan forces are being devastated.

    In short, the end result here is likely to be the destruction of the US position as world Hegemon, a result devoutly to be wished for by all of us who support a restoration of the American Republic.

    However, the cost in Ukrainian lives will be horrific, which is why I sincerely hope that the US Deep State comes to its senses and allows Kiev to agree to a compromise peace.

    Assuming the neocons are too insane to allow that to happen, the best bet to end the carnage is probably a massive Russian thrust to conquer the country, but I think Putin is focused on limiting his own casualties and is not willing to pursue a short-term solution.

    Which means the Ukrainian death toll will horrifically surpasses its already terrifying levels until the Ukrainian people demand peace.

    And the end days of the Hegemon loom closer.

    History is accelerating.

    “May you live in interesting times.”

  11. Hodag says:

    Zarensky will do as told and end the war when we want. We stop shipping things his army breaks and he gets strung up. If he stops now he is a heroic figure for all time.

    The US won the war when we blew up Nordstream. So let’s bug out.

    • Thanks: PhysicistDave
    • Replies: @Dube
  12. @Bardon Kaldian

    “Also, one crucial difference- both North and South Koreans belong to the same people. Not so with Ukrainians and Russians.”

    Not so fast, there are millions of Russians in the Donbas. Ukrainian attacks on the Donbas, was one of Putins’ stated reasons for war with Ukraine.

  13. But this war is 3 wars, not 2.
    This is the civil war, W vs E Ukraine (Galicians against Russian speaking Ukrainians.
    Then it is US/Nato vs Russia.
    And finally it is US vs China (sometimes called US vs Germany or EU).

    The whole purpose of the war from US pov is to stop EU/Germany buying Russian oil and gas, and more generally stop Europe from being a trading partner of China as China becomes the biggest Economy in the world (bigger than US on PPP since 2016).
    The third war has been hugely successful for US, with Europe now wholly dependent on US support and even US energy. The same people control our politicians here in Europe as control Joe Biden.

    The first war has been devastating for Ukraine – a hell hole now with barely any 16-60 year olds left to fight (though plenty have departed never to return – white immigrants of the kind both Russia and Europe want). Of course a big pit at the end of the Chinese Belt and Road is precisely the US goal.
    Note how US media has finally got around to just how many dead Ukrainian soldiers there are now.
    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/03/ukraine-media-start-to-acknowledge-reality.html

    The Second war has been a complete disaster for US/Nato who have lost and now have no credibility to negotiate a peace (Ukraine’s biggest problem is who can possibly represent it now, no Ukraine leadership, no credible partner that can make guarantees to Russia).

    The Third war was a resounding success in Europe but a complete failure elsewhere. Saudi and many countries now want to join BRICS+ ie to trade in the China Block, not the US block.

    The huge story this weekend was the Saudi – Iran deal. Biggest Sunni ISIS & Terrorist supporters do a deal with the major Shia power. Could well lead even to a peace settlement in Yemen (remember that crisis). Leaves Israel in a very weak position when its foes join up.
    Who provided the diplomacy for the Saudi Iran deal? The new Global leaders. China.

    • Agree: Cagey Beast
  14. @Bardon Kaldian

    Bardon Kaldian wrote to slumber_j:

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears of Russian threats. Ukrainians should have gotten jets & missiles galore, ling since & Russian military facilities should have been destroyed & Russian citizens sent to shelters.

    I urge everyone to keep in mind that my friend Bardon is an enemy alien who does not support the best interests of the United States of America. He is a Serbo-Croation, and I remind everyone of what happened in 1914 when the Serbo-Croatians managed to get the West involved in their own regional feuds in Eastern Europe.

    They are trying to do it again.

    We Americans are such fools that we tend to think that foreigners with no allegiance or loyalty to the American Republic and no ties to this country should have an equal say as actual Americans.

    Which is one of the many reasons that America is not likely to survive.

    Very few countries in human history have suffered from this particular version of insanity.

  15. J.Ross says:

    Huge news from Tucker: Ron DeSantis is not a Nulandite and doesn’t want to make fabulous profits from preventable deaths. DeSantis opposes all escalation, all offensive Ukrainian action, all weapons which enable same such as F-16’s, calls it a “territorial dispute” and not an “invasion” (correct by the way), and demands a refocus on our border and on our actual enemy, China.
    I am trying to reach the based department but all lines are jammed.
    ——–
    To Steve’s point,
    Koreans had local strength without us or China and Ike wanted the war ended pronto once he saw how it was being mismanaged. Ukraine is a single coat of nail polish on American power (Ukrainians will survive as a diaspora in a dozen countries, including Brazil and Canada). West and East Ukrainians (Russians) are far more different than North and South Koreans — they spoke different languages and historically were different countries. I don’t know if anyone in Korea talked about their alternate region the way US State Department aligned leaders in Kiev casually tossed off jokes about nuking the Donbas or implemented increasingly severe policies or artillery barrages targeting civilian areas (before Russia intervened).
    Korea was ended to a great deal because it not only involved, but criminally mismanaged, American soldiers, in memory of their greatest triumph to date, and the mismanagement was witnessed by the man who had been in charge of the triumph. I find no parallel at all in the most important thing. This was the mechanism of action of the peace.
    Another thing, Korea (both of them) was pretty much powerless and at the command of outside helpers. That’s different from this situation, where one side is only attacking at the behest of an outside helper, while the other side is not a weakened national region but a sovereign nuclear power with additional support from important producer nations. Russia tried to negotiate, it tried to join NATO. It has suffered a constant destabilization campaign going back to Hillary Clinton’s worst-ever term heading State (Blinken is not worst ever because he has not yet gotten his subordinates killed and then had nothing to say about it) and frankly I can’t see the advantage to Russia in letting terrorists buy time to plan more terrorism.

  16. @slumber_j

    Yes, Washington will decide what’s the Ukrainian position, not Zelensky or any other European. The actor and comedian was voted in as a peace candidate but that’s not what the West wanted of him. The West wanted to confront Putin and felt it had a strong hand against him. They still do so Zelensky will continue to do his green tracksuit and beard act.

    When the WaPo, Times of London and NYT start doing stories about how eastern and southern Ukraine always were kind of Russian, then we’ll know the West has had about as much fun as it can stand and wants to move on. That’s when Zelensky joins Noriega and Ngo Dinh Diem “on the wrong side of history”.

  17. @PhysicistDave

    Excellent – and I made similar comments below.
    The Ukrainian death rate is horrendous – and keeping that secret so that it may continue is probably the worst thing the western media has done since the silence on Cambodia and Laos bombing.
    I don’t like the term evil, but I can’t think of a better one for this.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  18. peterike says:

    Zelensky cares far more about where the border ends up than Eisenhower did in 1953

    LOL! What is it with these people? Zelensky doesn’t give the slightest damn about the border, or about Ukraine. He’s milking the war for all he can, and when Russia’s inevitable victory becomes obvious, Zelensky and the rest of his Jew team will bolt for Israel or Miami or wherever with their looted billions in Western aid.

    The fact that at this point people still can’t see what a psychotic monster Zelensky is, can’t see the endless war crimes being committed by Ukraine (yes, they are on video, hundreds of them), can’t see how Zelensky and Team Biden are happy to let every last Ukrainian die in a pointless cause… it’s all astounding.

    If Ukraine ends up split its an even bigger victory. Already the global center of human trafficking for both organs and sex slavery, all run by Jews through Israel, an entire generation of men are being slaughtered. This will leave thousands of widows and orphaned children, all the easier to exploit because they will be desperate. It will be a bounty for the Jews that control the place now, and do nothing but loot it’s resources. But by then we’ll all go back to ignoring Ukraine, the way we did before, so the Jews could exploit it and pad the pockets of Western politicians.

    • Replies: @IHTG
  19. @PhysicistDave

    Who’d have thought that having a Bronze Age Death Cult run Imperial Foreign Policy wouldn’t end well?

  20. peterike says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    What a company: Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, India, South Africa, Brazil. Fellowshit of the stink.

    So you mean basically the entire non-Western world, and the future power block both militarily and economically, while the West sinks into it’s own decadence, perversity and incompetence.

    None of those nations ever did a thing to me, other than ruin white nations with their population overflow and parasitical exploitation of stupid white generosity.

  21. Anon[465] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    AP has a very weird article about Covid era high-school grads taking decent jobs rather than going to college on student loans. They frame it as a looming disaster:

    What first looked like a pandemic blip has turned into a crisis. Nationwide, undergraduate college enrollment dropped 8% from 2019 to 2022, with declines even after returning to in-person classes, according to data from the National Student Clearinghouse. The slide in the college-going rate since 2018 is the steepest on record, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Economists say the impact could be dire.

    At worst, it could signal a new generation with little faith in the value of a college degree. At minimum, it appears those who passed on college during the pandemic are opting out for good. Predictions that they would enroll after a year or two haven’t borne out.

    But the individual stories seem pretty happy and in photos the kids seems very happy.

    There is data in the article bemoaning the “low” rate of college attendance by kids these days:

    Most states are still collecting data on recent college rates, but early figures are troubling.

    In Arkansas, the number of new high school graduates going to college fell from 49% to 42% during the pandemic. Kentucky slid by a similar amount, to 54%. The latest data in Indiana showed a 12-point drop from 2015 to 2020, leading the higher education chief to warn the “future of our state is at risk.”

    Even more alarming are the figures for Black, Hispanic and low-income students, who saw the largest slides in many states. In Tennessee’s class of 2021, just 35% of Hispanic graduates and 44% of Black graduates enrolled in college, compared with 58% of their white peers.

    “Just” 35, 44, and 58 percent!

    Plugging those numbers into my stats calculator I get the low-end IQ of college students as 97 for white, 92 for Hispanics, and 87 for blacks. It’s probably a bit lower for all three, since there people with higher scores who don’t go to college, bringing down the lower end. Maybe these figures include some community college dropouts. But it looks to me like too many people are still going to college.

    Maybe the looming disaster is that fewer kids will be brainwashed by CRT, gender ideology and so on.

    https://apnews.com/article/skipping-college-student-loans-trade-jobs-efc1f6d6067ab770f6e512b3f7719cc0

    • Agree: fish
    • Thanks: Mark G.
  22. @Bardon Kaldian

    That must be some strange Slavic custom, insulting the people you’re begging from. Maybe y’all should reconstitute the Austro-Hungarian Empire, I don’t know.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  23. There is so literally nothing analogous between the Ukrainian War and Korea that only an academic could have thought of that.

    Russia is not in any mood to negotiate anything, with Peskov saying just the other day that all goals now are military goals. Neither is Russia going to allow anything resembling “Ukraine” to exist on its borders ever again.

    This war will go on for another decade. Russia’s goals are the disintegration of NATO, the demilitarization of Europe, and the de-energization of the West. Their plan will be accomplished. Any self-delusory dreams about a return to the status quo ante are merely a symptom of Western hubris and cluelessness.

    The West still has no idea what hit it. It dies not realize that its money is gone, its energy is gone, its legitimacy is gone, and its hegemony is gone. The possibility of continuing as we have been is nonexistent.

    A turning point is coming, in about 3-5 years’ time, when the ordinary American man and woman realizes that Putin’s future is better for them than the future their own leaders have in mind. Then the Western political class will be truly isolated, and will thrash around violently in its final spasms of rage and denial. It will attempt to inflict upon us all the vengeance it could not inflict upon the world. But that is the moment of hope: one more acute crisis, and then normalcy returns. It will be up to all good people to fight the Battle of Bedford Falls, sacrificing to make their own towns and cities work while the speared walrus gurgles and dies.

  24. Arclight says:
    @PhysicistDave

    Was recently arguing with a lefty friend, who acknowledged that Ukraine cannot really ‘win’ this war but advocated for continuing to arm them and let the war roll on until it reached some maximum point of gains for Ukraine – which astounded me because it’s clear the high water mark for them was quite some time ago, now it’s just feeding their people into a meat grinder and gradually losing territory.

    Seems to be the same position of our leaders though – at some point they will wake up and realize the Ukraine doesn’t have enough conscripts or supplies to regain its former boundaries and a deal has to be made. The risk of course is that we take so long Russia calculates it will get everything it wants in the end if it refuses a negotiated deal. What will the geniuses in Washington do then?

    At any rate, American cultural, fiscal, and foreign policy in the 21st century has been one long, unbelievable disaster.

  25. @PhysicistDave

    News reports were that the Kievan regime and Moscow were close to an agreement last spring but that BoJo brought word from the Hegemon killing the agreement.

    From Ukraine Pravda:

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/05/5/7344206/

    Bojo basically said their sugar daddy (the West) wouldn’t back negotiations. And yet Biden keeps saying the decision will always be up to Ukraine. Lol.

    According Ukrainska Pravda sources close to Zelenskyy, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson, who appeared in the capital almost without warning, brought two simple messages.

    The first is that Putin is a war criminal, he should be pressured, not negotiated with.

    And the second is that even if Ukraine is ready to sign some agreements on guarantees with Putin, they are not.

    Johnson’s position was that the collective West, which back in February had suggested Zelenskyy should surrender and flee, now felt that Putin was not really as powerful as they had previously imagined, and that here was a chance to “press him.”

  26. slumber_j says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears of Russian threats. Ukrainians should have gotten jets & missiles galore, ling since & Russian military facilities should have been destroyed & Russian citizens sent to shelters.

    I’m not sure where cuckoldry enters into the equation, but that doesn’t strike me as more conducive to a negotiated settlement than what I indicated in my first comment.

    Also I don’t want more people sent to shelters. But I suppose that’s a separate discussion–in some ways at least.

  27. Pixo says:
    @AndrewR

    “it’s awfully hard to tell the difference between the Russians and Ukrainians.“

    Ukrainians look most like Poles, and somewhat less so like Germans. Slavic Russians are more diverse and sometimes look that way too, but tend to have thinner builds and slightly exotic asiatic features.

    For a long time Poles, Germans, Lithuanians and Jews dominated Ukraine. I wonder to what extent the type of downward mobility Clarke identified caused their Ukrainians vassals to be partially replaced. The Germans and Jews were more culturally distant and segregated, but probably they took in a lot of Polish blood.

    • Replies: @polaco
    , @Anon 2
  28. @Anon

    Back before 2008, lots of the better sort of Hispanic youths didn’t go to college or even dropped out of high school for decent paying construction jobs. Wages are pretty good once again, so maybe that’s what’s happening now.

    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
    , @Anon
  29. @Bardon Kaldian

    This is a clash of civilisations between those who believe gender is a spectrum and those who believe Russian-ness is. Or it’s between those who think race and sex aren’t real but Ukraine-ness is. To be more accurate, it’s the western position that race, sex, Russian-ness and Ukraine-ness can be either hazy or precise categories, depending on what suits us. Similarly, at the moment Georgia is European but Hungary is not.

    The CIA used to encourage its senior people to read “Seven Types of Ambiguity” but now our analysts are given a cookie for seeing things as childishly as possible. More than ever militant stupidity is rewarded and nuance is a dirty word:

    • Agree: Gordo
  30. @AndrewR

    This is water:

    And this is vitriol:

    Visually- no differences …

    • Troll: Gordo
  31. AndrewR says:
    @michael droy

    I’m really not one to ever defend the “western media,” but the Ukrainians are perfectly capable of telling the truth to the world. Or at least hiding the truth while they reach a backroom deal. I don’t really like seeing our money going to wage this war, and I really don’t like seeing Germany being destroyed over this. And I really, really don’t like risking direct war with Russia. And I know some Ukrainians are innocent, as are many of the Russian soldiers. But all in all, “western” governments and “western” media don’t have more obligation to tell the truth or to defend Ukrainian lives than the Ukrainians themselves do.

  32. @Anon

    AP has a very weird article about Covid era high-school grads taking decent jobs rather than going to college on student loans. They frame it as a looming disaster:

    It is a disaster for the Wokesters.

    Modern American universities are goldmines that can support enormous Woke hives of drones who have the sole task of spreading Wokism.

    They also serve as important beachheads for entering and eventually transforming conservative areas.

    Finally, they certainly can’t have potential future sheeple running around off the plantation, learning to think for themselves and eventually realizing how worthless Wokism is.

    • Agree: Mark G.
  33. @peterike

    and the future power block both militarily and economically, while the West sinks into it’s own decadence, perversity and incompetence.

    Do you actually think of these countries as the future power block? And that North American and European countries are somehow decadent, perverse, incompetent- in comparison with those countries?

    These countries mean: cannibalism, mass murder, public defecation, slavery, public torture and executions, genocide,….

    Really- I don’t know what to say. Or, perhaps, I do. I prefer marginal trannies & casual sex to prostitution as a way of life and public hangings and shitting on the road.

  34. Dumbo says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Ukrainians are Russians. They speak the same language, share the same ethnicity, eat the same food. All the Ukrainians I know in the West speak only Russian, buy food in the same Russian/Ukrainian/East Europeans stores, etc. They followed the same religion until they decided to separate for political reasons, except for a few Catholics. We can say that the West of Ukraine has more Polish and Jewish influence, and that’s why it got so messed up, while the East is more Russian.

    They were part of the Russian Empire for centuries and of the Soviet Union for decades. It used to be called “Little Russia”. At least half of the population didn’t even care for independence in 1991. Half of the population didn’t want that Maidan goverment.

    I personally don’t care, but the idea that Ukrainians and Russians are “completely different people” is retarded. This war is stupid. Only stupid people support the Ukraine. Ukrainians are stupid. They are stupider even than Poles and Croatians. But all Eastern Europeans are mostly a riffraff. Except maybe a few Serbs. And few Russians. The Russians I know in the West are mostly cool. I tend to sympathize more with Russians, just as I sympathize more with Serbs.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @raga10
  35. Dumbo says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Ukrainians should have gotten jets & missiles galore, ling since & Russian military facilities should have been destroyed & Russian citizens sent to shelters.

    Hey armchair hero, why don’t you go fight in those international brigades in the Ukrainian Army, and leave all others out of this mess?

    Slavs are really utter trash. The world doesn’t owe you shit. Go f. yourself.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  36. @Steve Sailer

    The white kids mostly male, have figured out that college, as it stands is a scam. There will not be jobs waiting for them post grad, that will pay enough to even pay off their student loans. And white males do not want to go into tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt, and spend four years in a hostile environment constantly being told they are evil, and in some instances literally, being told they should be exterminated. As for the STEM! STEM! STEM! Argument, wokeness action hires are eliminating job opportunities for even the best of the best white males. You are too smart, and too observant, to post something as trivial as… “the Hispanic kids are making good money in construction, so they are blowing off college.”
    You post article after article about this stuff all the time.
    My oldest son blew off a full ride at RPI as a chemistry major, and headed to Berklee music in Boston after one year because he said “I’m not dealing with this shit!” Eight years post grad, he’s making six figures writing and producing commercial jingles, and teaching music. STEM job? He’s not a woman, Asian, black, dot Indian, or tranny.
    My youngest son, a STEM kid, blew off the University of Buffalo, a decent STEM school after a year for the same reason to head into skilled trades.
    College is not anything like when you or I were in it.

  37. IHTG says:
    @peterike

    Hey, where my sex slave at?

  38. polaco says:
    @Pixo

    Ukrainians look Russian to me, both men and women, the physiognomy is always a tip-off, some may look Polish or Ugo.

    Their top general and his typical Russian, Khrushchev-like, facial features:

    I’d say Russians and Ukrainians have more in common than, for example, the Low German dialects speakers and Swabians in Germany. Der russische Bruderkrieg.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  39. Jack D says:

    Today what is happening is a war of Ukraine against Russia.

    That’s right. I remember last February 24 when the Ukrainian tanks crossed the border and rolled toward Moscow.

    Oh, wait, that didn’t happen.

    Nevertheless (and despite the Ukrainian talk of regaining all their territories) one could see a potential deal along Korean lines – the Russians withdraw to the borders of 2/23. There are already rumors that the Russian collaborators (Russian speaking Ukrainian citizens) who have helped run the newly occupied territories are already being withdrawn to Russia. Much of this territory would probably be lost in the planned Ukrainian spring offensive anyway so this would be a good deal from the Russian POV. From the Ukrainian POV, they get this territory back without losing any more men. Both sides would end the war equally unhappy with neither side’s goals being met, just as in Korea. The hard liners on both sides will be pissed that their sacrifices were for nothing.

    Apparently Xi is coming to Moscow and is scheduled to talk to Zelensky immediately after. China has portrayed itself as neutral in this conflict and wanting peace. Maybe Xi would throw in some reconstruction aid from China as a sweetener. China is making lots of $ on $60 Russian oil.

    The other way that this deal will resemble Korea : unoccupied Ukraine becomes part of the West, just like S. Korea. Politically and militarily. Russia gets to remain a pariah state vis-à-vis the West.

  40. Sean says:

    Eisenhower “It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop”

    Assuming Russia gets the Donbass and then finds itself facing an Ukrainian force that is extremely well equipped with Western military technology and willing to attrite Russia over many years, Putin might end the war the war the way Eisenhower did with when faced with a stalemate in Korea: ‘Tell your proxy army to stop fighting or I’ll nuke ’em’.

    Assuming Russia does not dare threaten to use or actually use theatre thermonukes, it will be begin to be ground down to a clear failure in Ukraine in about a 18 months with what is going to happen eventually being clear long before the denouement, giving the infuriated Kremlin a thirst for revenge. The ready to hand and relatively safe way would be to encourage and support China by giving it a carte blanch. Already completely unrealistic to think China would fight America without Russia having China’s back. A quagmire in Ukraine for Russia would quite likely overlap with a Chinese invasion of Taiwan if the Chinese were really intent on retaking it because Taiwan is encouraged to make noises about formal independence, China might prefer to go at the US indirectly at first by using North Korea as a proxy to attack the South where US troops are within reach.

    But China wants to continue as it is, and and though they support military containment, which I suppose means deterrence, both Japan and Germany have said they want to continue doing business with China too). No one is able to explain how if there is not a war, bases and naval patrols of sea lanes are going to constrain China’s industrial growth, meaning stop China expanding economically. China’s military spending is increasing only concomitantly because it is still pegged at 2% of GDP’

    It was easy to study the USSR or even Putin’s Russia and think that the Western way was the only one because Russians are not all that different to Americas. However the Chinese in China are simply less individualistic and more cooperative than any Western people, There is little evidence from China’s recent history that they must ape western society or the wheels will come off of the economy, indeed the norm for most of human history has been China being responsible for a third of global productive capacity.

    Throughout the Cold War the US was closer to the USSR and Red China than they were to each other; America masterfully built up China against the USSR, which could not even feed itself and the USSR concentrated on weapons production to the detriment of its economy. In 2022 China and Russia became geostrategic partners and over-against America. Lo and behold, it was suddenly discovered that China was in irrevocable decline. Biden has repeatedly scoffed at the idea of China as real economic competition for America. The USSR’s strongest suite was always nukes (they may have had am edge over the US at one point in the eighties), and Russia has essentially equivalent ICBM capabilities to the US, meaning that they would destroy each other in a nuclear war. Mearsheimer predicted that Ukraine was going to need nukes to prevent Russian bullying, and he predicted China would become a peer competitor of the US. The one thing he did not count on was Russia getting so close to China.

  41. Corn says:

    If I recall correctly another thing that helped Ike negotiate an end to the Korean War was that he hinted he would use newly developed atomic artillery to break the stalemate.

    Can’t say I want Biden implying any such thing…

  42. Mr. Anon says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears of Russian threats.

    The cuck position is to let your own country get dragged into other people’s wars. No Russian ever called me “deplorable” or “insurrectionist”. Why should any American die for an imperial government (“ours”) that despises us, that promotes our disenfranchisement, that promotes every known manner of degeneracy and perversion? Why should any of ours fight and die for the rainbow flag?

    F**k you, Bardon. You want a war, YOU go fight it. The Ukrainians are taking volunteers.

  43. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    Our gardeners’ son started helping them in his senior year of HS. He graduated in 2020, expecting to work for a while and then go on to the JC and eventually college. Well, he makes such good $ doing yardwork that he’s still out there, now talking about taking over the business when his parents retire.

    College is great, but working is great too. It’d be nice if more young people could find an efficient way to combine them. Likely less GE requirements and more internships.

  44. Jack D says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Russia is not in any mood to negotiate anything, with Peskov saying just the other day that all goals now are military goals.

    Peskov is a dancing monkey who literally says whatever Putin tells him to say. If Putin told him to say that the moon is made of green cheese, he would say it. There is no need for Peskov to be consistent. If tomorrow Putin decides the opposite, Peskov will declaim it with equal enthusiasm.

    Naturally, in a war, and especially with the Russian understanding of “information warfare”, Russia (and to some extent the Ukrainians too) are going to announce that they have maximal goals and that they are “winning”. They will keep saying this right up to the day that they surrender (not that they are about to surrender). No one of any intelligence is supposed to literally believe what they are saying. Sometimes there is information to be gained by closely analyzing Kremlin statements, but not by taking the pronouncements literally. You have to read between the lines. For example, when Putin threatens nuclear war, that means that the war is going poorly on the battlefield.

    • Replies: @Vito Klein
    , @Hunsdon
  45. Anon 2 says:
    @Pixo

    For several centuries Western Ukraine (west of the Dnieper river) was
    part of the Polish-Lithuanian Res Publica, dominated by the Polish
    Crown. Kiev was a Polish-ruled city for over 100 years, and Lvov was
    a Polish city for many centuries until in the 19th century it became
    part of the Austrian partition. Hence the Ukrainian language itself
    is in many ways a heavily polonized form of Russian.

    The point is that at the very least the western third of Ukraine had almost
    nothing in common with Russia, being ruled by Catholic powers like
    Poland and briefly by Austria (only Galicia), and therefore regards itself
    as part of Central Europe. If you visit Lvov, you’ll know immediately you’re
    not in Eastern Europe. This war is partly because Western Ukraine wants
    to be like Poland, and not like Russia. 3.5 million Ukrainians currently living
    in Poland attest to that. Western Ukrainians feel they are part of the Central
    European civilization, along with Poland, Czechia, Hungary, etc. This has
    nothing to do with the U.S. or Russia. They feel it is part of their tradition
    and their national destiny.

    • Replies: @Anon 2
  46. @polaco

    The commander of Ukrainian ground forces is Russian from Russia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleksandr_Syrskyi

  47. TWS says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    We are in the elites looting the silverware stage of this fiasco. The conflict they engineered in Russia is just the straw that broke the camel’s back. It was already so over burdened it was ready to crash.

    Now banks can’t fail and the rich never lose money? The playing field is tilted and crooked as a pinball table.

    • Replies: @Hunsdon
  48. Tiny Duck says:

    Russia will lose in the end.

    America will grow stronger because we are moving away from the fetid white male and is malidorous inflience on society

  49. QCIC says:

    A similarity with the Korean war may be a DMZ along the Western and Southwestern borders with Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania.

    A significant similarity with WW2 may be post-War trials of “NeoNazis”.

  50. @Intelligent Dasein

    Putin’s future is better for them than the future their own leaders have in mind

    Putin offers no future. He is an aging bureaucrat clinging to faded dreams of the USSR. You think the average American wants to live in a country of grinding rural poverty where all natural resource wealth is spent on a cosseted class of urban elites? Russia is everything a true American conservative considers a nightmare.

  51. @Peter Akuleyev

    You think the average American wants to live in a country of grinding rural poverty where all natural resource wealth is spent on a cosseted class of urban elites?

    No, silly. I said Putin’s future is better than what Americans get now!

  52. @Bardon Kaldian

    I’d say that the big difference is one side is decisively winning the war. This war isn’t a stalemate like the Korean War was.

    The Ukrainians are fighting bravely, but you can’t win an artillery duel when the other side outguns you at least 5-to-1 and has longer-range guns.

    The entire game plan of the West hinged on the economic sanctions destroying Russia’s ability to wage the war. When that didn’t happen, they should have pushed for peace. Instead, the insane neocons doubled down and choose to sacrifice tens of thousands of Ukrainians, hoping that the sanctions will work at some point. It’s criminal.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
  53. @Vinnyvette

    As for the STEM! STEM! STEM! Argument, wokeness action hires are eliminating job opportunities for even the best of the best white males.

    Yup.

    Here’s the latest in STEM education at RIT just one hour east of Buffalo:

    https://www.rit.edu/news/zoo

    Obviously, White men need not apply.

    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  54. Art Deco says:

    The front moved around a great deal more during the Korean War. I’m going to wager that eventually they get tired of shooting at each other over a few hundred yards of ground.

  55. Art Deco says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Russia’s income distribution is quite ordinary. The most affluent decile receive about 30% of the country’s personal income, similar to that in the United States and Argentina. In France, the figure is around 26%.

    • Thanks: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
  56. @PhysicistDave

    There’s no indication that Putin want to conquer all of Ukraine. Why would he? Western Ukraine is a mess and has been a mess forever.

    The outlines of a peace deal are pretty clear – not that the neocons will allow it:

    1) The Donbas is now Russian

    2) Russia gets to keep the land bridge to Crimea

    3) Crimea is recognized as Russian

    4) NATO and Ukraine promise that Ukraine will be neutral

    5) The remaining Ukraine east of the Dnieper River will remain under Ukrainian control but will be a de-militarized zone

    6) Ukraine will not be allowed missiles with a range long enough to hit Russia. Only short-range, defensive missiles

    That’s how this war ends.

  57. The United States was fighting China.

    The United States was fighting the Soviet Union.

    The modern research is that Stalin gave the go ahead to Kim to start the war. Mao was left out of the loop.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War#Prelude_to_war_(1950)

    This so that Mao would have to abort an invasion of Taiwan– Stalin wanted a KMT-CCP split of Mainland China along the Yangtze River anyways, not for the latter to overrun all of it.

    Chinese soldiers, many recently surrendered KMT troops, were used as proxies and cannon fodder. Lingering resentment over this was what later led to Sino-Soviet Split.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Inter-Camp_P.O.W._Olympics

    • Agree: nebulafox
  58. @Bardon Kaldian

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears…monumental cowardice

    You’re bravely fighting for Ukraine right? Are JackD and HA next to you? If no, why not? Are you a coward?

    laziness & stupidity espoused by US, UK

    A Slav calling other stupid. Pot, meet kettle.

    Agree: Johann Ricke

    • Agree: Ennui
  59. “The US won the war when we blew up Nordstream.”

    Certainly as far as detaching Germany from Russia is concerned, which was one of the main aims of NATO – to keep “the US in, the Germans down, and the Russians out“.

    But that was when Russia was the Soviet Union, with a state ideology of communism. It hasn’t been for 30 years.

    As far as I an see it the US has promoted the Ukraine/Russia split as part of the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz doctrine, that no nation other than the US should have world power generation capability.

    The thesis says that Russia + Ukraine = world power potential, Russia – Ukraine = regional power.

    Therefore Ukraine must be an ally of US rather then Russia, hence Nuland/Maidan and all that.

    Naturally Russia takes a different view, hence the current unpleasantness.

    But the US seems to be fighting the wrong war. Other than multi-waveband radios, vodka and quality amateur telescopes, Russia doesn’t seem to be a consumer powerhouse. Meanwhile China is leaping ahead and IIRC is already the world’s biggest economy in purchasing power parity terms.

    Forcing the world’s resource/energy giant and the world’s production giant together is a very brave strategy, as they used to say in “Yes, Minister”. Aka a pretty foolish one.

    China as a partner for a country has one major advantage, in that they won’t mandate transgender bathrooms or Drag Queen Story Hour as a condition of development funding.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Thanks: Coemgen
  60. Voltarde says:

    Instead of the Korean War, a better analogy would be a messy divorce and the ensuing argument over the property settlement (i.e., borders).

    Sometimes real divorce proceeding do turn exceptionally nasty, even deadly.

    Say you’re Russia. Your sister (ethnic Russians in the Donbas and Novorossiya) lives right next door to you. She’s in a failed marriage.

    Your brother-in-law (Kiev Regime) falls in with a bad crowd (UniParty NeoCons/NATO). He starts beating your sister (ethnic Russians in Ukraine). Again and again. Indeed, your brother-in-law starts killing several of her children, those who side with their mother. These kids are your own nephews and nieces.

    You (Russia) can’t take it any longer, so you attempt a reconciliation. Twice (Minsk I and Minsk II). Actually, your brother-in-law and his supporters were completely insincere about reconciliation and the latter just wanted to see even more violence against your sister and your family (Russia).

    Finally, you (Russia) say enough is enough. You intervene to protect your sister and the endangered kids who support their mother.

    People supporting the Kiev Regime loudly shout “Outrage! Outrage! Horror! Horror!” and all sorts of threats and abuse against Russia, her people, and their government.

    So the Government of Russia stood up for her people (ethnic Russians in the Donbas and Novorossiya). Like in the analogy described above, no honorable person would do otherwise.

    If your sister was in a messy divorce, and getting repeatedly abused, beaten, and having some of her children murdered by an abusive husband, and you stood by and did nothing, then you are a shameful and dishonorable person. Even more shameful and dishonorable would be someone from the other side of town who was bankrolling and arming your drug-addled, violently abusive brother-in-law.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @QCIC
    , @Almost Missouri
    , @Jack D
  61. Anon 2 says:
    @Anon 2

    At this point the best case scenario would be for western Ukraine (incl. Kiev)
    to join the E.U., and simply forget about the rest. The problem is that
    Ukraine is horrendously corrupt, even more corrupt than Russia. How is
    it possible for a country to be more corrupt than Russia? After all,
    when you travel through Russia, and leave Moscow (or SPB), you
    immediately realize that Russia is a country of lazy, drunken, and
    corrupt rednecks (“vatniki” etc). Moreover, there is a demographic
    implosion of Christians taking place in Russia (accelerated by the war)
    with a simultaneous demographic explosion of Muslims, so slowly
    but surely Russia is becoming a Muslim country. Ukraine, of
    course, wants no part of this.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @AndrewR
  62. @AndrewR

    I don’t know if he’s lying. Historians often misapprehend and/or misinterpret what they see. Being a “military historian” he is probably more interested in battles than in what caused battles.

    But yeah, his analysis is obviously way off. This is a war of the neocon deep state against Russia. The Ukraine is only involved because they were willing to be the neocons’ cat’s paw. (Except for the ones who fled, surrendered, or were pressganged.)

    Ironically, Moise reaches approximately the right conclusion but for the wrong reason. A ceasefire is unlikely, but not because of anything to do with Ukraine or Russia, Zelensky or Putin. It’s because of the factor he is (deliberately?) blind to: neocons have no stop condition other than total defeat of Russia.

    • Replies: @Nicholas Stix
  63. I am old enough to remember when the “Serbo-Croatian “ identity was being promoted.

    Until it wasn’t.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  64. I’ve read a few comments on my comment here. Most are simply silly, but, what is interesting: it is if they’re written by hysterical 13 years olds.

    Unbelievable.

    Men, supposedly over 30 & more, behave like spoiled children throwing tantrums & generally, whining like semi-retarded adolescents on dope.

    Really- hard to believe.

    For those Russia’s admirers, another “nice” info on Putin the white warrior:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-13/italy-wants-nato-to-help-combat-russia-driven-migrant-influx?leadSource=uverify%20wall

    Italy Wants NATO to Help Combat Russia-Driven Migrant Influx

    Italy’s defense minister on Monday called for help from NATO and the European Union to help deal with a new influx of migrants from north Africa he said has been sparked by Russian meddling in the region.

    The “exponential increase” in migrant arrivals across the Mediterranean is “part of a clear strategy of hybrid warfare” by Russia’s paramilitary Wagner Group, which is using its influence in some African countries to foment a crisis, the minister, Guido Crosetto, said in a statement Monday.

    Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is on the defensive after more than 70 migrants drowned off Italy’s southern coast last month when a boat conveying them from north Africa capsized. In a hastily convened cabinet meeting in the Calabrian town of Cutro, near where the tragedy occurred, the premier pledged to further crack down on human traffickers.

    But criticism over her handling of rescue operations and her government’s tough anti-migrant policies have continued to hound Meloni, with jostling from within the coalition making the situation worse.

    As many as 30 people are missing after another vessel carrying migrants sank off the Libyan coast on Sunday, according to the Italian Coast Guard.

    “Europe’s southern flank is becoming more dangerous by the day,” Crosetto said, adding that waves of migrants should, like cyberattacks, be considered part of a wider global confrontation between the West and Russia.

  65. @Cagey Beast

    The CIA used to encourage its senior people to read “Seven Types of Ambiguity” but now our analysts are given a cookie for seeing things as childishly as possible. More than ever militant stupidity is rewarded and nuance is a dirty word:

    Quite a few of them post here and call people “fanboys” and “Putinistas” and pretend they can’t distinguish between “wanting Russia to win” on the one hand and thinking this conflict is not relevant to the United States on the other.

    • Agree: Cagey Beast, Ennui
  66. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    I remember reading an article — sorry I can’t remember the source — which claimed that Truman was trying to signal to Mao that Truman wouldn’t stop CCP from invading Taiwan. In the meeting the Secretary of State showed the “vital interests “ of the US, including Japan and Philippines while carefully leaving out Taiwan.
    Oops. They forgot to include South Korea as a vital interest. The article claimed that Stalin and Kim got the message that the US wouldn’t stop them from invading South Korea.

    Oops.

    I don’t know if this is true or not. This is similar to stories that Bush Sr signaled to Iran that an invasion of Kuwait would be okay but meant only that an invasion of a small amount of disputed land would be okay.

    These little misunderstandings somehow lead to the deaths of millions and the destruction of entire nations.

  67. Jack D says:
    @Anon 2

    The problem is that Ukraine is horrendously corrupt, even more corrupt than Russia.

    I’m sure there is corruption, but will give y0u a personal data point. When I visited Western Ukraine (Lvov region) several years ago (long before the current war), the father of the Lithuanian man we were traveling with was convinced that we would get pulled over in a phony speed trap by Ukrainian cops looking for a bribe. He gave use very detailed instructions on how much to pay, how to pay it, etc. In reality, nothing of that sort happened to us. No sign of any corruption at all. It was very slow at the border from Poland, with a long line of Ukrainians driving ancient Ladas and smoking furiously (the drivers, not the cars) but again, no one asked us for any bribe. Ukraine is still a very poor country.

    The closest we got to anything corrupt was that when we were at the main square of Lviv, a shill approached us and recommended a restaurant. We didn’t really have any other restaurant recommendations and decided to go with his recommendation. He took us to a very modest looking place that was a block or two off the square in the kind of street that wouldn’t get a lot of walk by trade. There was a pretty big menu but in traditional Soviet fashion, whenever you asked for a dish on the menu, they didn’t actually have it. (Not that Ukraine was short on food – the supermarkets were well stocked). Finally we gave up and asked them what they DID have. What they did have was (I forget the exact dishes) good home style food like your Ukrainian mama would cook and the prices were very modest. As we were leaving we saw our shill eating a bowl of soup which presumably was his reward for steering us there.

    So the place was more poor than it was corrupt as far as I could tell. Naturally when people are very poor they will do things in order to get by that they might not do otherwise.

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @QCIC
    , @Colin Wright
  68. @Tiny Duck

    You are not even worth blowing a troll button on… tiny dick

    • Agree: tyrone
  69. @The Wild Geese Howard

    Thanks Howard! Checking it out. You the same Wild Geese Howard I see over at Zman?

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
  70. @Bardon Kaldian

    Also, one crucial difference- both North and South Koreans belong to the same people. Not so with Ukrainians and Russians.

    Do you mean that the border line in Korea was pretty arbitrary and it’s not in Ukraine? That I agree with.

    But otherwise, I don’t really see the relevance to Korea as the people and their feelings about it were essentially a non-entity. The decision makers were effectively the Chinese and the Americans (UN) and to a lesser extent the Kim-Il-Sung and Syngman Rhee regimes, but they were dependent on their patrons. The Korean people were not consulted.

    It’s true that Russia’s is occupying a whole lot of Ukrainian territory full of people who mostly do not want to be part of Russia. Which makes it hard to have a cease fire agreement.

  71. Even Serbs are ridiculing the autocrat: https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/542635/putin-pobeda-snaga-rusija#comments

    We are stronger than thought: Putin outlined the way to win in Ukraine

    Some comments:

    If we are going to be honest

    On the contrary, you are weaker than what was thought both in the East and in the West

    Tassos Pagonispre

    You won’t, but what can you say to the poor Russians..

    Marko

    He could make that joke again about the freezing of the Germans and the collapse of the European economy….

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  72. @Bardon Kaldian

    Convince Americans why they should care which set of Slavic oligarchs rules which parts of Ukraine.

    This is laughable:

    The “exponential increase” in migrant arrivals across the Mediterranean is “part of a clear strategy of hybrid warfare” by Russia’s paramilitary Wagner Group, which is using its influence in some African countries to foment a crisis, the minister, Guido Crosetto, said in a statement Monday.

  73. Pixo says:
    @Dr. X

    They are always hoaxes. The interesting question is whether the hoaxer gets punished.

    • Agree: Vinnyvette
  74. @Citizen of a Silly Country

    The Russian Army Is Running Out Of T-72 Tanks—And Quickly

    Russia’s tank shortage is worse than some observers previously thought. The Kremlin’s stocks of its most numerous tank, the Cold War-vintage T-72, are running out fast.

    The worsening T-72 shortfall helps to explain why the Russians increasingly are equipping their newly-mobilized battalions with obsolete T-62 and T-80B tanks.

    But per @partizan_oleg’s earlier count, the Russians had 6,900 old T-72s in storage, around a third of which might’ve been recoverable after decades of corrosive exposure to rain, snow and cycles of hot and cold.

    The problem, for the Kremlin, is that @partizan_oleg’s February count was off. Double-checking their numbers on Tuesday, @partizan_oleg realized that, in fact, the Russians probably only have 1,500, not 6,900, old T-72s in storage. “And many of them are probably not in good shape,” they pointed out.

    The recount was pretty straightforward. @partizan_oleg started with the number of T-72 hulls that Soviet industry produced in a 23-year production run between 1968 and 1991—18,000—and started subtracting tanks the Soviets and Russians either lost in combat, abandoned abroad or exported to foreign customers.

    That’s how they arrived at the much lower number of war-reserve T-72s. The big variable, @partizan_oleg acknowledged, is that their production data might not include the very first T-72 model, the crude T-72 “Ural.” It’s unclear how many Urals the Uralvagonzavod factory in Sverdlovsk Oblast may have produced then stored. Perhaps hundreds. Perhaps a couple thousand.

    But even after adding some very old Urals to @partizan_oleg’s T-72 survey, a stark conclusion is unavoidable. The Russians have lost potentially two-thirds of the T-72s that are in active service or in recoverable storage.

    So it makes a lot more sense why the Kremlin is pulling out of storage T-62 tanks that are even older than any T-72 is, as well as T-80Bs that are roughly contemporaneous with early T-72s. Russian industry can produce just a handful of new tanks every month—far too few to make good monthly losses in the triple digits.

    All that is to say, the Russians are running out of tanks. And quickly.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/03/12/the-russian-army-is-running-out-of-t-72-tanks-and-quickly/?sh=1a9875456099

  75. Jack D says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    For a while, Belarus (which doesn’t do anything without approval from Moscow) was acting as a channel for African immigrants to enter the EU via Poland. The Poles are less worried about liberal opinion than the Italians and there was no sea for the migrants to drown in so the Poles just pushed them back over the border into Belarus. After Belarus ended up with a bunch of Africans on their side they quit doing this.

    Yes, I am shocked by the insane level of pro-Putinism revealed in the comments. I think what is going on is that the American right has lost its mind. They are beginning to see that Trump was perhaps their high water mark and that under the current system they have nothing to look forward to, especially in the blue states but perhaps the whole country to the extent that it is controlled by the Democrat Permanent Government. From now on, people like them are going to be a despised minority and our new national heroes will be trannies and black ladies whose hair you must not touch. (The reality is not that bad but this is how they perceive it).

    Therefore, the only solution for them is that the current regime has to be thoroughly discredited and destroyed. They are hoping and praying that there will be a bank run and the economy will crash and America’s neoconservative foreign policy (meaning Ukraine) will go down in defeat and so on. Somehow, from the ruins of this economic and military defeat, a new, better America that puts the interests of white Americans first and doesn’t pretend to be the world sovereign will emerge. No, they are not neutral – they want Putin (whom as you say they idealize anyway as the leader of a white Christian nation with strong moral values) to put the American beast in its place.

    Once you understand that they WANT America (as it currently exists) to be destroyed and defeated and discredited, it all makes sense why people who you would otherwise normally expect to be patriotic are rooting for America’s enemies.

  76. QCIC says:
    @Voltarde

    This analogy has merit but is unfortunately highly misleading because it suggests Ukraine (the brother-in-law) has agency in this mess. The West has had it in for Russia for a long time, even prior to the existence of modern Ukraine as an independent state.

    • Agree: Voltarde
  77. AndrewR says:
    @Anon 2

    Because the EU is notorious for xenophobic, pro-natalist and Islamophobic policies? Lmaoo

    • Replies: @Anon 2
  78. QCIC says:
    @Jack D

    I see what you did there. Interesting propaganda.

    A heartwarming little personal anecdote somehow offsets world-scale corruption of the Biden family in Ukraine along with a huge list of widely documented aspects of corruption including oligarchs, fake actor President, etc.

  79. @Jack D

    True American patriots, seeing the slow collapse of their country from fiscal and military overreach, cultural poisoning, and open borders, should be asking “What’s best for Ukraine?!”

    • Agree: Mike Tre, Vinnyvette
    • LOL: Hunsdon
  80. @Voltarde

    Good metaphor, but the question is, in this metaphor what is the ceasefire/settlement state?

    The other-side-of-town guy seems to have no intention of stopping bankrolling and arming the drug-addled, violently abusive brother-in-law. You (Russia) can’t directly harm the the other-side-of-town guy. So you either have to abandon your sister and nephews/nieces (seems unlikely), or finish off the abusive brother-in-law. A year ago you said would accept your brother-in-law’s pledge to stop the abuse, but since then he’s boasted that his pledges were just lies to deceive you. There is no higher court to appeal to.

    So it seems the only outcomes short of nuclear war are abandoning Donbas or beating the Kiev regime into submission. Other options?

    • Replies: @Voltarde
    , @Jack D
  81. If Dave Pinsen is browsing, this might be a sell signal, otoh it might be a “buy arms manufacturers and potassium iodide retailers” signal.

    a/c/t the Donbass Devushka channel, there’s been an “incident” over the Black Sea involving a Reaper drone.

  82. @Cagey Beast

    This is a clash of civilisations between those who believe gender is a spectrum and those who believe Russian-ness is.

    No it’s not.

    This is more wishing-and-hoping by people on the “right”, somewhat similar to this idea that that some banking crisis is going to bring down our traitorous elites.

    No Putin’s War is just the same age old Russian imperialism that’s been a bane upon human existence for about the past three centuries.

    Russian arrogance–with French encouragement–along with the Austrian arrogance and the French and Germans and finally the English piling on, dragged us into the great 1914 debacle. The first half of my life, Russian imperialism was a gigantic–ridiculously expensive–millstone around the world’s neck. Then blissfully it was lifted.

    That this is just Russian imperlism redox, is not my triple bankshot analysis. You don’t have to take my word for it. Putin gives long ponderous speeches where he explains Russia that its some great tragedy Russia is entitled to all this territory–full of people who do not want to be bossed around by Russians–and it’s a great tragedy that Russia has lost it.

    You want to be a shill for Russian imperialism … go right ahead.

    But it has basically zero to do with all the stupid minoritarian fetishes of Western elites. It’s just yet another Russian asshole pushing other people around and getting lots of people killed.

    • Agree: Yahya
    • Thanks: Jack D
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  83. Jack D says:
    @Voltarde

    This is a complete fiction. No one in Ukraine was beating ethnic Russians in Ukraine or killing Russian children until Putin stuck his nose in there.

    Putin doesn’t actually give a shit about the Russians of Donbas or for that matter the Russians of Russia, as shown by the fact that he has gotten so many of them killed. He is interested in going down as the new Peter the Great. Putin has said as much. He said that people die anyway every day from getting drunk and getting in car accidents and so on, but to die for Russia is glorious!

    Hitler used the protection of the Germans of Czechoslovakia as his excuse for invasion also. Protecting Russians is one of about 5 rotating excuses that Putin has used for invading Ukraine depending on which one suits him that day. No one except the rubes is supposed to believe this. Sophisticated people in Russia don’t believe it. Lavrov doesn’t believe it. They understand that this war is about restoring the Great Russian Empire as a civilization that stands apart from the West, about gathering the Russian speaking people under one flag inside of Russian World. If you have to tell some tall tales about Russians getting beaten in order to accomplish this, that’s just one more aspect of warfare. Russian old people who get all their news from Russian TV have an excuse for buying into the propaganda, but what is your excuse?

  84. @PhysicistDave

    modern warfare has been artillery warfare

    I’ve generally refrained from commenting on the combat of the Ukraine war because I’m no expert and even the experts are getting a lot wrong. But it is hard not to notice that the ascendancy of mobile warfare that dates from World War Two seems to have ground down and we are now back to World War One-style trench/artillery/attrition warfare one century after we thought we had left that behind.

    It seems that satellite and drone surveillance, modern anti-tank missiles and digital artillery targeting have made tanks as vulnerable as they have ever been. So territorial advances now are less often a matter of armored breakthroughs than of methodical bombardment exploited a yard at a time by infantrymen carefully picking their way forward.

    Both sides have managed occasional dramatic breakthroughs when and where the other side wasn’t prepared, but as the military frontier becomes more defined and defended, the trend is looking more and more like northwestern France a little over a century ago, just with fewer men and more capital (to put it in crude economic terms).

    Having access to more advanced NATO weapons and surveillance against Russia’s less advanced anti-tank weapons and surveillance, the Ukraine may yet pull off another mobile thrust (perhaps the left bank of the Dnieper “Spring Offensive” the Ukraine shills keep telegraphing?), but Russian anti-tank weapons are cheap and numerous, and a few wrecked high-tech NATO tanks on the battlefield are going to look worse than a lot of wrecked Soviet surplus tanks (as well as being more expensive: Russian tanks are something like 1/2 – 1/20 the cost of the NATO tanks depending on the model). And unlike the Soviet-era tanks that each side can say belonged to the other, there is no question where the NATO tanks came from.

    tl;dr: I wouldn’t necessarily have agreed that “modern warfare has been artillery warfare” from, say, 1939-2022, but it is looking that way again.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  85. Voltarde says:
    @Almost Missouri

    As another commenter (J. Ross) pointed out, in response to a series of questions from Tucker Carlson, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said this about America’s vital national security interests:

    “becoming further entangled in a territorial dispute between Ukraine and Russia is not one of them”

    This is real progress towards genuine patriotism: the foreign policy vision of America’s Founders.

    I can’t dismiss the threat of nuclear war due to the Ukraine conflict, but the probability is diminishing because the horrific, cumulative losses of the Ukrainian military are becoming too obvious to deny.

    The EU’s economic situation is horrible. The irony is that affordable Russian hydrocarbon fuel is now lost to the German economy. As a result, Germany will be much less willing, or able, to subsidize the rest of the EU. Some of the countries that receive the largest EU subsidies are the same countries that are the most enthusiastic about waging war with Russia!

    Economic realities will change EU policies (and eventually also America’s) towards Russia, but unfortunately there will be many more needless deaths in the Ukraine in the meantime.

    • Agree: Mark G.
  86. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘Also, one crucial difference- both North and South Koreans belong to the same people. Not so with Ukrainians and Russians.’

    That’s an over-simplification — and a poisonous one.

  87. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    I’m no military expert either, but I get the feeling that this war is not fully representative of what a war between two fully armed modern armies (let’s say the US vs the Chinese in a few year from now) would be like. Neither side was fully equipped with up to date armaments and state of the art training for combined operations. Neither side was able to effectively use air power. They were fairly evenly matched with each other (thus neither side has been able to win so far) but matched at a low level.

    I have no doubt that if the US Army had gone up against the Russians we would not have ended up with trench warfare. The US Army would have retained the ability to remain mobile and use its armor with air and infantry support. The whole reason tanks were invented was to punch thru trench lines. The Russian anti-tank weapons are not fully effective against state of the art Western armor and defensive weapons such as the Israeli Trophy system.

    What I don’t know is what would happen if the US Army went up against an equally trained and equipped army. I hope we never get to find out.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
  88. The war ends when we stop paying the Ukraine to continue it.

    …it’s not that Russia is the good guy here. It’s just that no one else is either.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  89. @Jack D

    For example, when Putin threatens nuclear war, that means that the war is going poorly on the battlefield.

    Not necessarily. It could mean that he’s learned that the Khazar Jews are about to deploy, for example, some kind of biological weapon.

  90. @AnotherDad

    – You’re assuming Russia ends at the internationally recognized borders of the Russian Federation but it does not. Thanks to Lenin and Krushchev the Ukrainian republic left the USSR with lots of historically Russian territory and lots of Russians living on it.

    – Russians were willing and able to live with that until things went off the rails in 2014, thanks largely to western mischief-making.

    – The Soviet Union was a Marxist-Leninist state dedicated to internationalism. It was run by Georgians, Ukrainians and Jews as much as it was run by Russians. Roughly speaking every nationality in the USSR had its perpetrators and its victims.

    – Soviet troops ended up in Eastern and Central Europe thanks to Hitler, not Russian imperialism.

    – Putin said the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union left Russian people destitute and minorities in brand new countries. That was the tragedy.

  91. The Z-man looks at civilizational collapse. He’s been batting a thousand of late.

    Overlaying all of this is the crisis of competence. The SVB fiasco is a great example of a problem that permeates American society. Instead of rewarding skill and accomplishment, our system is rigged to reward nonwhites at the explicit expense of whites, especially white males. The only market that is booming in America is the racial revenge market and the result is colorful people in positions of authority who lack the basic skills to do the jobs they have been given.

    Thirty years ago, people warned about this. What started as tolerance in the 1980’s, became sensitivity in the 1990’s, then diversity in the new century. It has now turned into a full blown cult of anti-whiteness. While towns in Ohio suffer from an ecological disaster, the people in charge fret of racist sidewalks. Corporate America is more concerned with its ESG and DEI scores than its financial stability. We have combined demographic reality with anti-white fanaticism into a ruling ethic.

    No society can run this way. Good luck fighting China with a rainbow coalition of drag diverse drag queens trying to operate space guns. Good luck weathering a reorganization of the financial system when the banks are run by people who were just recently coaxed from caves by European explorers.

    https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=29506

    • Thanks: Vinnyvette
  92. @Jack D

    ‘…I’m sure there is corruption, but will give y0u a personal data point…’

    Meh. I will give you a personal data point. Two, in fact.

    Remember how New York City supposedly had a lot of crime back in the day?

    Well, I spent some time in the city, and nothing ever happened to me. Q.E.D.

    …in another statistical breakthrough, I went to El Salvador in 1988. Nothing happened to me there either. So much for the ‘civil war,’ eh?

  93. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    Why is it important that the Russians not abandon Donbas? Russia is vast and underpopulated. Couldn’t the Russian speaking population of Donbas (the ones who want to be Russian citizens) be resettled inside Russia and they could do their Russian thing there? I realize it’s not optimal but it wasn’t optimal for the Germans of Konigsberg or the Finns of Karelia or the Anglo-Irish of southern Ireland and so on to have to leave either. Is this war about people or is it about territory? Why does Russia need more territory when it is already so vast?

  94. @Art Deco

    Go see for yourself. Russia’s affluent decile is almost entirely concentrated in Moscow, with some capital in St Petersburg and Sochi. That’s why Moscow is objectively a fantastic city to visit. The Russian “Federation” is centralized to a degree that makes France look good.

    Maybe the best comparison is the UK, which also has an issue with a rich metropolis hoarding wealth while people in smaller provincial towns live in some of the most abject poverty in Western Europe.

    But the RF is even worse than that. There is no Edinburgh or Bristol in Russia. Moscow is the be all and end all.

    One aspect of Ukrainian revulsion towards Russia that rarely gets discussed is that Ukraine, for all its flaws, is still a more decentralized country where citizens have a voice in local government and local governments are still seen as shields against Kiev. Russian speaking Ukrainians don’t want to be ruled by elites in Moscow. This seems like a sentiment that rural and small town Americans should understand.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
  95. @Cagey Beast

    That is a very Canadian image!

    Canada is the most Ukrainian country outside of Europe, perhaps outside of Ukraine.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  96. Voltarde says:
    @Jack D

    Putin doesn’t actually give a shit about the Russians of Donbas or for that matter the Russians of Russia.

    Sadly, objective reality has no influence on your thinking.

    Political leaders are graded on a curve. Based on objective evidence, which political leader has overseen more improvement in the country that he or she has led over the past 25 years than President Putin has improved Russia?

    Name that political leader, please. Provide the objective evidence.

    Better yet, let’s ask ChatGPT a couple of questions:

    1) Based on objective evidence such as increased agricultural production, increased industrial production, increased lifespan, increased per capita income, reduced infant mortality, and other economic and social criteria, how much specific economic and social improvement has resulted in Russia (the Russian Federation) since 1999?

    2) How many languages does President Putin of Russia speak?

    (ChatGPT answers appear below, after the MORE tag)

    Have you ever actually read any of President Putin’s many detailed speeches on economic and social policy? Have you ever actually observed him in lengthy, detailed interviews (e.g., Oliver Stone’s) and other impromptu debates and discussions?

    Has any American president even tried to learn one foreign language, let alone learn several? Has any British or American politician ever given a lengthy, detailed policy address to the Bundestag in German, as President Putin has done?

    Please, your nonsense about the “Russian Empire” is rich, coming from a NeoCon supporter of an out-of-control NeoCon MIC that has resulted in what, 700+, or is it now 800+ (hard to keep track in a real empire) NeoCon military bases around the world.

    Finally, President Putin’s family lived through the Siege of Leningrad. As the overtly Nazi Azov Batallion and other motley fascists and German tanks attack Russia yet again, President Putin needs no lectures from the likes of you about Hitler.

    [MORE]

    ChatGPT answers:

    1) Since 1999, Russia has undergone significant economic and social changes. Some of the objective evidence of this improvement includes:

    Increased agricultural production: Russia’s agricultural production has increased steadily since 1999. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, Russia’s total agricultural production increased by 30% between 2000 and 2019.

    Increased industrial production: Russia’s industrial production has also increased since 1999. According to the World Bank, industrial production in Russia increased by 17.5% between 1999 and 2019.

    Increased lifespan: Life expectancy in Russia has increased since 1999. According to the World Health Organization, life expectancy at birth in Russia was 65.3 years in 1999, and it had increased to 72.6 years in 2019.

    Increased per capita income: Russia’s per capita income has also increased since 1999. According to the World Bank, Russia’s per capita income increased from $2,453 in 1999 to $11,280 in 2019.

    Reduced infant mortality: Infant mortality in Russia has decreased significantly since 1999. According to the World Bank, the infant mortality rate in Russia decreased from 15.8 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1999 to 3.8 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2019.

    Overall, Russia has made significant economic and social progress since 1999, with improvements in agriculture, industry, health, and income. However, it is important to note that Russia still faces significant economic and social challenges, including high levels of inequality, corruption, and political instability.

    2) President Putin of Russia is known to be fluent in Russian, which is his native language. Additionally, he is also known to speak English and German, although he has acknowledged that his proficiency in these languages is not as strong as his proficiency in Russian. He has also been reported to have some knowledge of French and Spanish, although it is not clear how fluent he is in these languages.

  97. Anonymous[332] • Disclaimer says:

    There must be a fair and equitable peace settlement that satisfies the security concerns of both countries, namely:

    1) Ukraine must withdraw all of its troops from east of the Dnieper and forever renounce NATO/EEC membership.

    2) President Putin must make a solemn and binding promise that he will never, without provocation, attack, invade or otherwise threaten Ukrainian territory west of the river.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @HA
    , @Inquiring Mind
  98. @Reg Cæsar

    “Canada is the most Ukrainian country outside of Europe, perhaps outside of Ukraine.”

    And that wasn’t really a problem until recently. Having the grandchild of an Axis collaborator call us Nazis and declare martial law on us has been a real treat. I haven’t been able to eat a perogie since.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Jack D
  99. Anonymous[420] • Disclaimer says:

    Maybe more like Manchuria.

    Unlike Ukraine, Korean civilization was pretty distinct with clear boundaries. Once Japan was out, it was clear what Korea is and where its borders are. Only reason why Korea became an issue was because US insisted on division with Soviets taking only the upper half. Despite both leaders, north and south, being puppets, they wanted a united country because the division was imposed from above. And the final decision to end the war was wholly decided by the big powers, esp. US and China(that entered to save the north, if only as buffer).

    In contrast, the Manchuria situation was more like Ukraine today. Manchurian identity and culture, like those of Ukraine, have long been ambiguous. They were distinct from the Chinese but also part of Chinese civilization, especially after Manchus became the ruling dynasty over China. Rise of modern Chinese nationalism both vilified Manchurian rule but also insisted on Manchuria as an integral part of China. But China was weak and divided by warlords while Japan grew strong and moved into Manchuria, ostensibly to defend Manchurian autonomy from China(and Russia) but really to colonize it as part of the Japanese empire. Plenty of Manchurians were outraged by Japanese influenced and sided with China, but others eagerly collaborated with the Japanese(with Koreans serving as co-colonizers alongside the Japanese).

    Likewise, Ukrainian culture and history are ambiguous. In large part, neither Ukraine nor Russia can be understood apart from one another. Also, what exactly is Ukraine and its borders? A big chunk used to belong to the Polish Empire. Poles sought to Polishize Ukrainians like Germans tried to Germanize the Poles, and plenty of Ukrainians took the bait. Later, a huge chunk of what was given to Poland was added to the Soviet Union.
    Thus, West Ukraine vs East Ukraine was different from North Korea vs South Korea. Whereas in the case of Korea, a single civilization was divided in two, Ukraine was a case of two cultures forced into one, something that never quite caught on, leading to all sorts of political troubles after the fall of the Soviet Union. (The Great Famine didn’t affect what is now West Ukraine because it was part of Poland then.)

    One reason for high levels of corruption is the distrust and division among ‘Ukrainians’, with half looking westward and the rest looking eastwards. ‘Western’ Ukrainians tolerate corruption as long as it’s on their side, and ‘Eastern’ Ukrainians have done likewise. Solzhenitsyn saw the troubles ahead when the Soviet Union began to break apart and insisted some of Ukraine be added to Russia as it was integral to Russian history. Because of the history of tug of war among empires, Ukrainian identity is ambiguous to this day, expressed by the need of certain Ukrainians to import nationalism from abroad(even the extreme kind like Aryanism and Nazism) to rile up patriotic fervor. These Ukrainians define themselves against Russia but aren’t clear what they are for, all the more troublesome because Ukrainian culture makes little sense minus an integral connection to Russia.

    In the end, Koreans had no say whatsoever in how the war ended. But the fate of Ukraine will depend largely on what the various Ukrainians want and which side they want to support. Obviously, those in Crimea and Donbass region want to be with Russia. Clearly, most of Western Ukraine want to be aligned with Poland the the West. Some of the areas in between are more complicated. Some are clearly pro-Russian, but if Russians were to enter those areas, they might trigger more aggressive counter-responses from the West. But even the West has troubles, partly because the Ukrainian economy is centered more in the east and because Poland is eyeing parts of Ukraine through reconquesky lens.

    Indeed, the reason why Jews were able to manipulate Ukraine so easy is because of the real divisions. Divide and rule is easier with diversity. In this sense, Ukraine is also somewhat like Yugoslavia, still a troubled area in Europe. ‘Yugoslavian’ identity, like the ‘Ukrainian’ identity, was never a clear thing and, sadly, Tito failed to achieve what Bismarck did in unifying the various German regions together. Prussians had the power and prestige to win respect from the other Russians, whereas the Serbians failed to play this role under communism.

    In the end, Japan lost all of Manchuria which is now wholly integrated with China.
    I don’t see Ukraine going that way, but Russia will likely gain a hegemonic foothold over the eastern part of Ukraine and force neutrality on the Western part(which may lose a chunk to Poland). The problem will likely be more resolved than Yugoslavia but never as fully as Manchuria, which under Han Chinese CCP was fully absorbed into China. Mongolia, wrested from the Chinese Empire by the Russian empire, is a different matter. But it seems to be integrating more with China than with Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union.

    • Thanks: Harry Baldwin
    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
  100. tyrone says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    cuck fears of Russian threats

    ………..You mean the use of nuclear weapons, right , is that the “cuck fear” of which you speak.

  101. @Jack D

    It’s a fair point that maybe population movements could be part of a settlement of this conflict, as it has been in others.

    Is this war about people or is it about territory?

    Russia’s objectives were Donbas and Crimea + neutral Ukraine. Even if we assume Donbas was about people rather than territory and therefore can be settled by population movement, that still leaves Crimea and neutral Ukraine. Since Crimea includes the Russian naval base at the strategic port of Sevastopol, that looks very much about territory, so population transfers won’t work.

    As for Ukrainian neutrality … if NATO will agree to it okay, but otherwise Russia either has to accept NATO in Galicia or change Kiev’s regime. I don’t know the over/under on that.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  102. @Intelligent Dasein

    Then the Western political class will be truly isolated, and will thrash around violently in its final spasms of rage and denial. It will attempt to inflict upon us all the vengeance it could not inflict upon the world. But that is the moment of hope: one more acute crisis, and then normalcy returns. It will be up to all good people to fight the Battle of Bedford Falls, sacrificing to make their own towns and cities work while the speared walrus gurgles and dies.

    This. The monster is mortally wounded now. All we can hope for is that not too many innocent people are killed by its thrashing tail before it finally expires.

  103. Dumbo says:

    Sorry to say, but the problem is really the American (neocon) mentality. Ukraine would be nothing without US support.

    Americans freak out about a Chinese weather balloon and shoot it down. Then in panic they start shooting lots of random “objects”.

    Now the Russians apparently downed an American drone that was snooping in tbe Black Sea, probably to pass info to the Ukrainians. The Americans are saying that the downing was “reckless, unprofessional and environmentally unsound.”

    But if it had been a Russian drone over Alaska? The American government would get hysterical and probably start World War III.

    American neocons are insane, and they must be removed from power before they destroy all of us.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64957792

  104. @Jack D

    Lying isn’t nice.

    Ukraine and Azov attacks on Donbas from 2014 to 2021 led to 3,400 civilian deaths and around 7,000 injuries.

    https://ukraine.un.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/Conflict-related%20civilian%20casualties%20as%20of%2031%20December%202021%20%28rev%2027%20January%202022%29%20corr%20EN_0.pdf

    They understand that this war is about restoring the Great Russian Empire as a civilization that stands apart from the West, about gathering the Russian speaking people under one flag inside of Russian World.

    What exactly is wrong with that?

    Also, what’s the neocon excuse for the war? As best as I can tell, the neocon goals are:

    1) Hurt Russia because of a very personal ethnic grudge

    2) Get Ukrainians killed because they hate them too

    3) Screw over Germany specifically and Europe in general

    Granted, the neocons are succeeding on goals 2 and 3. Goal #1, however, isn’t turning out so well. US prestige has been badly damaged and the demise of treasuries as the global reserve asset has been hastened, though it’s still a long way off. Oh, and Russia is winning the war. That’s very clear now.

    The neocons have also driven the world’s biggest resource country into the arms of the world’s biggest manufacturer. Genius!

    Finally, nobody but the idiotic Europeans (and Steve) trust the neocons anymore. The rest of world is finally realizing what a bunch of sociopaths the neocons are and trying everything that they can to gain their freedom. Again, it won’t happen soon, but it’ll happen a lot faster than it would have if the neocons didn’t push Russia into this war and throw everything that we have against them.

    What neocons don’t understand is that China doesn’t want to take over the world, neither does Russia. They and the rest of the world don’t want war with the US. They just want to ignore us, to not have to deal us.

    But like Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction, the neocons won’t be ignored. They live to meddle in other people’s business. The neocons don’t give two farts about Ukraine or Taiwan. They care about being able to tell the world what to do and to force their insane version of culture down their throats.

    The rest of world now understands that the neocons will never – never – leave them alone unless they’re forced to.

  105. @Jack D

    Neither side was fully equipped with up to date armaments and state of the art training for combined operations.

    “You go to war with the army you have.”

    Neither side was able to effectively use air power.

    Antiaircraft missiles are cheaper than aircraft. Also true over the Taiwan Strait.

    The whole reason tanks were invented was to punch thru trench lines.

    Right. Which is why it is striking that they don’t seem to do that much anymore.

    The Russian anti-tank weapons are not fully effective against state of the art Western armor and defensive weapons such as the Israeli Trophy system.

    Emphasis added.

    Western tank ~$10,000,000.
    RPG ~$1000.

    I hope we never get to find out.

    Ditto.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  106. Dumbo says:

    Is this war about people or is it about territory?

    It’s about neither. Russians and Ukrainians are cousins and could live in peace without conflict, just like Russians and Belorussians do. But Ukrainians have an inferiority complex and a complicated history, and are being used by the U.S. as a cudgel against Russia. The country was in a de facto civil war since 2014, West vs East, already with American/NATO support to the Western side. Since Feb 2022, Russia had enough and decided to support more forcefully the Eastern side.

    To my mind, Ukrainians are naive, if not dumb. The West won’t help them in the end. They are in all ways closer to Russia than they are to the West. Also, the West is an illusion. What is the West today, besides money? Multiculturalism and transgenders. In the long run, it’s better not to belong to the West. Eastern Europe should run away from the West, which right now is a machine that destroys countries from the inside.

  107. I find it amazing that the following set of facts exist — and that many will not acknowledge them.

    1. Prior to 1991, the history of Ukraine was always entwined with that of Russia. They only became distinct in the era when the Ukraine was the part of Russia that Poland ruled. It was in no sense an ‘independent country.’

    This isn’t to say Russia should rule the Ukraine. It is to say it’s nonsense to pretend they are two completely separate and distinct countries. It’s not Russia and China. It’s not even Russia and Poland. It’s more like Pennsylvania and Virginia — to the extent that it’s like anything.

    2. Post-1991, everyone from Kissinger on down kept saying,‘don’t admit the Ukraine to NATO; Russia won’t be able to take that.’

    3. In December 2021, Putin said, ‘don’t admit the Ukraine to NATO; I won’t be able to take that.’

    4. In succession, Blinken and Harris then invited the Ukraine to join NATO.

    5. Hey: lookit that! Russia invaded the Ukraine!

    6. …and just in time. Now Biden had something to say for himself at his State of the Union Address.

    I’d been wondering what he would come up with.

  108. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    Since Crimea includes the Russian naval base at the strategic port of Sevastopol, that looks very much about territory,

    Russia had a long term lease on the Sevastopol base just as we have a lease on Guantanamo in Cuba. That was completely workable. Putin didn’t need to grab Crimea either any more than we need to occupy Cuba in order to maintain our base there.

    As much as it pains the Ukrainians, they are probably not getting Crimea back (at least in the short run). If there is a deal to be made by the Chinese at all, it will involve Russia going back to its 1/22 borders and not further. Neither side is going to be willing to lose (much if any) territory vs. those borders. As the original article said, one of the things that made the Korean deal possible was that the borders were close to where they started. Of course the Russians would prefer that a cease fire be at their current position too but Ukraine will never agree to that given the current state of battle.

    At this point, Ukraine is defacto a part of the EU and NATO. Any deal is going to involve Russia recognizing that. Otherwise Ukraine will consider a cease fire to be merely a pause while Russia rearms for round 3 of its piecemeal dismemberment of Ukraine.

    If Putin didn’t understand before that (outside of the Donbas) Ukraine doesn’t really want to be part of Russian World, he must understand it now and accept the reality that it is not going back to the Russian sphere in his lifetime.

  109. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    A $1,000 RPG is not effective against a modern tank equipped with explosive armor and so on. However a $26,000 Kornet might work on certain parts of the Abrams. Again you have to understand that American tactics would not involve sitting in one place and waiting for the Russian infantry to shoot Kornets at them.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
  110. @Jack D

    Russia will not leave the Donbas, except by force.

    You and neocons are delusional if you think that Russia would accept that deal. Russia considers the Donbas and Crimea Russian territory now. They’d no more agree to giving them up than they’d agree to give up Moscow.

    Any peace deal with require at a bare minimum the US accepting 1) that the Donbas and Crimea are Russian territory and 2) Ukrainian neutrality.

    Personally, I doubt that the Russians would even go for that. I suspect that they want eastern Ukraine either under their control or a demilitarized zone. The Russians correctly don’t trust the neocons to keep their world, so they’ll want a natural barrier between Russia and the West. Ukraine east of the river fits the bill perfectly.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  111. @Jack D

    lol. HackD proving once again he’s a fed.

  112. @Jack D

    I should have added that given that Kiev spent the previous eight years shelling the Donbas, it is not so clear why Kiev wants what they spent the previous years bombarding.

    While it is the part battlefield most amenable to resolution by migration, why not let the Kiev loyalists migrate closer to their capital? Kiev should like that because then if the conflict restarts, they won’t accidentally bombard the “wrong” people anymore. The migrants should like it because then they are farther from the frontlines

    Since Crimea is a territorial matter, the territorial land bridge to Crimea matters almost equally. So everything between Russia and Sevastopol is still a territorial matter. Since Sevastopol controls Russia’s warm water access to the world ocean, migrations and pledges aren’t going to ameliorate much there.

    Ukraine will consider a cease fire to be merely a pause while Russia rearms

    Since Kiev already bragged that’s why they feigned acceptance of the Minsk agreements, I guess they know whereof they speak.

    • Agree: R.G. Camara
    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @R.G. Camara
  113. @Bardon Kaldian

    Bardon, I agree with the first part–a bunch of commenters here have bought into some low-rent Putin’s the white savior b.s. (Seriously, Chechen war, millions of illegals from the ‘stans, muzzie asses in the air mooning Moscow, yeah Putin really cares about self-determination in the Donbas or the welfare of Russians. About as much a Joe Biden cares about Americans.) These guys are just cheap dates for Putin’s old-as-the-hills Russian imperialism. That is truly pathetic.

    But the 2nd half of your comment is ridiculous.

    Regardless of anything Russia is or isn’t doing, the African immivasion thing both
    a) exists
    and
    b) is trivial for Western nations to stop. A few ships of Italian Navy alone could end this thing in an afternoon. (Ok, maybe a month to convince all Africans it was over.)

    Your own excerpt:

    Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is on the defensive after more than 70 migrants drowned off Italy’s southern coast last month when a boat conveying them from north Africa capsized. In a hastily convened cabinet meeting in the Calabrian town of Cutro, near where the tragedy occurred, the premier pledged to further crack down on human traffickers.

    But criticism over her handling of rescue operations and her government’s tough anti-migrant policies have continued to hound Meloni, with jostling from within the coalition making the situation worse.

    … makes the point. “On the defensive”? “criticism” because a bunch of African invaders drowned?

    It’s the fundamental job of the Italian leader to protect his country (yes, I know she’s a woman but it’s a man’s job) from invasion. If invaders die–BFD. The important thing is that they do not get to invade you. Staying in their own damn country is best. But dying is just as good from the perspective of Italians.

    If the Italian people–and especially her coalition–do not stand with Meloni on keeping the African garbage out … that’s the problem. The symptom of a feminized, minoritarian brain-addled West.

    And it’s got zero to do Putin’s stupid imperialist war.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
  114. @Jack D

    Why does the United States need to meddle in the rest of the world’s business. Outside of nukes, there is zero threat to the US.

    But, sure, let’s move millions of people from their ancestral homeland, businesses and homes. Also, the Donbas has a lot of natural resources and industry. Why give that up? If the Russians don’t take it, Blackstone will.

  115. @Bardon Kaldian

    lol. Looks like HackD is either sockpuppetting or the feds are diverting more agents to hyping up their Team America World Police “fight to defend Ukraine!” war-mongering for the military-industrial complex.

    Smells like desperation for the Boeing-and-RAND pro-Zelensky puppets and their corrupt bosses.

  116. @Bardon Kaldian

    The US is doing too little because of cuck fears of Russian threats. Ukrainians should have gotten jets & missiles galore, ling since & Russian military facilities should have been destroyed & Russian citizens sent to shelters.

    lol. Shut up, fed cuck.

    We are not Team America World Police, and we are not here to help out Dementia Joe’s slush fund/NATO missile site.

    Back to the RAND drawing room with you!

  117. Russia just downed a US drone off the coast of Crimea. The Russian pilots didn’t fire on it but brought it down using other methods.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  118. Ennui says:
    @PhysicistDave

    Still not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.

  119. Ennui says:
    @Jack D

    Jack D says the Russians can all move to the balmy climes of the Sakha Republic.

  120. Ennui says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    You just want our money, you insufferable beggar. If you don’t have a Hapsburg, Romanov, or Ottoman adult around, it’s geopolitical toddler time.

  121. Pixo says:
    @Jack D

    A lot of that is correct, but you can also simply see Putin as not an enemy of America, but rather an ally of one faction and enemy of another. That’s how I saw Putin 2015-2021.

    What the Putinfans miss now is that invading Ukraine was an indefensible and objectively evil act. It was his decision to ruin what was looking like a new, Greater-Europe right-populist axis with Trump and Putin as co-leaders. He’s abandoned this to be the junior member of a Putin-Xi anti-West block.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @R.G. Camara
  122. @Jack D

    A $1,000 RPG is not effective against a modern tank

    How about 10,000 RPGs, which is the number the tank must resist to break even? And the US/NATO does not like to break even, but to dominate with 1:5 or 1:10 casualty ratios.

    a $26,000 Kornet might work

    Modern tank vs. 400 Kornets?

    Buying Kornet shares on PredictIt (or however that meme works)

    In WWII/Great Patriotic War, all sides found that infantry with light antitank weapons could stop a tank by immobilizing the tracks, which are still the Achilles’ Heel of armor. The turret can still shoot of course, but unless their side is already winning, the crew become very uncomfortable since an immobile tank is a sitting duck for artillery, which impacts the thinner deck armor.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  123. According to a 2020 Forbes story, Reapers are now priced at $32 million, more than an AH64 helicopter.

    That’s an expensive incident. The Russian story is that the Reaper was on a course for Russian territorial waters with its transponders switched off.

    If that was so there may not be a Flightradar24 trace. Anyone know?

    AD – what I call truly pathetic – in its original meaning of “very sad” is carrying water for the same people to whom in domestic matters you’re totally opposed.

    Do you think they become good guys outside of the US?

  124. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    At this point, Ukraine is defacto a part of the EU and NATO.

    Ukraine and its youthful leadership ought to be congratulated on their creative strategy that has resulted in the actual member countries of Nato and EU doing all the heavy lifting for Ukraine while it gets the benefits of full membership without getting its hands dirty.

    https://babel.ua/en/texts/91428-volodymyr-shamil-sheredeha-was-injured-in-the-war-and-has-not-been-able-to-walk-since-he-overcame-depression-was-in-a-psychiatric-hospital-twice-and-now-he-helps-other-wounded-fighters-a-long-intervie?utm_source=page&utm_medium=publication

  125. Jack D says:
    @Pixo

    I’m not sure that a Trump-Putin axis ever existed in the 1st place. It might have existed more in the fantasies of both the American Left and the American Right than it resisted in reality.

    Putin acts (in this order) in what he perceives as his own interest, the interest of his inner circle and lastly the interests of Russia in general. He does not give two shits about anything or anyone else, including Donald Trump, the white race, worldwide Christianity, etc. He views everything and everyone else as objects to be manipulated in order to further the interests of #1. Sometimes such manipulation consists of flattery, other times it may consist of violence. Questions of morality do not weigh in the balance at all, only the likelihood of success vs failure. When Biden was elected, Putin probably concluded that flattery wasn’t going to work (and that Biden was weak and indecisive) so he decided to resort to violence instead.

    I don’t know how Trump would have reacted if he had been reelected and Putin invaded Ukraine. According to Trump, IF he had been reelected, Putin would not have invaded in the 1st place. This is might or might not be true, but if Putin had invaded I don’t think that Trump would have just shrugged his shoulders the way some people here would have preferred.

    • Replies: @Sean
  126. You guys have nothing but time on your hands, evidently, to pontificate, argue and discuss things about which you actually know very little.

    Good God, this barbershop has gotten old and worn. I Buzz my own head now. Why don’t y’all just play checkers?

    Bye.

  127. @Almost Missouri

    “neocons have no stop condition other than total defeat of Russia.”

    But why?

    As I see it, (at the risk of repeating myself…) this war is the biggest money-laundering operation in the history of the world.

    Thus, fake president/real gangster Joe Biden (aka Pal Joey) is stuffing his pockets with billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars from White citizens.

    Comedian/real gangster Vladimir Zelensky is likewise stuffing his pockets with billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars from White citizens.

    U.S. armament manufacturers are also stuffing their pockets with billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars from White citizens.

    But that still doesn’t explain the neocon role. Operatives like Bill Kristol don’t work for nothing, but I don’t see Pal Joey sharing his booty with Kristol—too cheap. Ditto for Zelensky, who is not just cheap, but even more arrogant than Biden. That leaves the armanent manufacturers.

    If Bill Kristol isn’t getting paid off by the armanent manufacturers, the only other option I can think of would be the dnc. He could even be getting paid off by both.

    Do you have an alternative hypothesis?

  128. Anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    That must be some strange Slavic custom, insulting the people you’re begging from. Maybe y’all should reconstitute the Austro-Hungarian Empire, I don’t know.

    Our vassals need diversity and it will come to them quickly.

    Eastern Europe is too white.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/RealGemmaOD/status/1633392244894859265/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1633392244894859265&currentTweetUser=RealGemmaOD

  129. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    Since Crimea is a territorial matter, the territorial land bridge to Crimea matters almost equally. So everything between Russia and Sevastopol is still a territorial matter. Since Sevastopol controls Russia’s warm water access to the world ocean, migrations and pledges aren’t going to ameliorate much there.

    You shouldn’t have stopped there. What about the Bosporus? Doesn’t Putin need that too?

    Doesn’t Putin need a neutral Ukraine as a buffer state between it and NATO? Does Putin need Russian troops to be stationed everywhere east of the Elbe in order to protect Russia from invasion? Stalin did.

    Once you adopt this logic, there’s no end to Russian World. Putin famously joked that Russia’s borders don’t end:

    https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/vladimir-putin-jokes-that-russian-borders-dont-end-1629868

    He wasn’t really joking.

    It’s easy for Putin to give up Donbas which was never really his to begin with. For Ukraine to tear off its limbs in order to feed the Russian bear is a completely different matter.

    Now you are just being “cute”. Being cute like this is not going to lead to a peace deal. Russia has to recognize that its military incursion has been a failure and there is no immediate path to victory in Ukraine. Obviously Putin knows this on some level but he still hopes to salvage something out of this.

    Maybe Xi can talk some sense into him as to what it is he can realistically hope to salvage. Maybe make him understand that China is not in a position to back him with weaponry but that the West is going to continue to arm Ukraine. China would like to get back to normal trade relationships with Europe so that they can become rich enough and strong enough to dominate Asia and Putin in interfering with their plans. They would like this war to go away.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
  130. raga10 says:

    Does Korea thus provide a model for ending the Ukraine War?

    Since Korean armistice only suspended rather than ended hostilities ,with the result that North and South Korea are technically still at war some 70 years later, I wouldn’t consider it a good model for anything.

  131. @Pixo

    What the Putinfans miss now is that invading Ukraine was an indefensible and objectively evil act.

    lol. No, liar.

    Putin invaded because (1) NATO was attempting to put long-range missles in Ukraine to threaten major Russian cities; (2) the mass looting and corruption the U.S. was doing in Ukraine, including installing a pro-U.S. puppet regime; and (3) the Donbass and Crimea.

    That doesn’t make Putin evil or good. It makes him a politician acting on behalf of his nation’s political interests. And the U.S. shouldn’t even be in Ukraine. We are not Team America World Police.

    Deep State lying won’t work here, fed.

    • Replies: @raga10
  132. @Almost Missouri

    Don’t bother arguing with JackD, he’s a warmongering fed, designed to push the neocon/neolib military-industrial world view. JackD wants war at all costs, to boost his masters’ bottom line.

    In short, he’s a plant. Ignore and ridicule him.

  133. polaco says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Russians flew their MiGs with Chinese and North Korean markings, as their proxies lacked the expertise and training.

  134. Steve, comments in mods, thanks.

  135. @Dumbo

    Ukrainians are Russians.

    Congratulations. You proved that your nick-name is more than adequate.

  136. @R.G. Camara

    I very much doubt he’s a plant. But he is most definitely an Ukrainian Jew whose American founding mythology begins with Ellis Island, not the American Revolution. Very, very different perspective.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
    , @ATBOTL
  137. @slumber_j

    Does Korea thus provide a model for ending the Ukraine War?

    No.

    Preserving North Korea as a buffer state to keep hostile U.S. land forces at a reasonable distance from the Chinese border was worth a lot to the Chinese. Mao would have far preferred to get the U.S. off the Korean Peninsula entirely, which would have been a much better buffer that eliminated any avenue for future ground attack entirely. But the Chinese were fighting the U.S. military directly and simply lacked the ability to push the U.S. out, given its superiority in resources and firepower. So they had to settle for half-a-loaf, i.e. half of Korea.

    Russia, by contrast, definitely has the option of just taking the whole loaf. Contrary to Deep-State/MSM talking points Russia is winning the attrition and arms production war decisively. If they just keep doing what they are doing long enough they can’t fail to win completely — i.e., take over all of Ukraine and/or dictate terms to whatever defeated rump state is left to sign a paper.

    Our idiot neocon overlords have made certain that Russia has to pursue this course. Russian Plan A was to diplomatically maneuver to keep Ukraine unaligned and/or not heavily militarized. That failed because we staged a coup to turn Ukraine into a de facto Nuland puppet and then proceeded to arm it to the teeth. We rejected the Minsk accords. We rejected Putin’s invitation to negotiate a new security framework in December 2021. We rejected the tentative peace deal to end the war reached in April 2022 at Istanbul.

    Instead the neocons have announced that there purpose is to destroy Russia to the maximum extent possible. And that as long as Ukraine exists it will be a U.S. proxy, armed to the teeth, and with a never ending mission to attack and undermine Russia and reconquer the Donbas and Crimea. Moreover, history shows that the U.S. is “agreement-incapable” and will merely exploit any “peace” for the purpose of rearming to re-launch the war at a more advantageous time down the road.

    Strategic decision making is not necessarily that hard — You just have to be able to put yourself in your opponent’s shoes and think how things look from his perspective, and how he will act accordingly. But if you are a neocon, you just assume that you are morally righteous and omnipotent, and that you can’t f*ck up anyway because the media will always cover for you and just blame evil Putin-Hitler for everything bad that happens.

    The neocons have forced Russia into one conclusion: Finish Ukraine once and for all, or fight it under far worse circumstances later. It’s a no-brainer for Russia. The best historical analogy is not the U.S. vs. China in Korea, but King Arthur vs. The Black Knight.

    [MORE]

    • Thanks: PhysicistDave
    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @nebulafox
  138. Jack D says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    In that case, there is no deal to be had. The deal that you describe is not going to be acceptable to the Ukrainians. And, whether you like it or not, the West is going to keep backing them, at least until the end of the Biden Administration. So Russia is just going to have to keep sending its young men to die in Ukraine.

    Apparently the prisons are empty now so Wagner is trying to recruit in skinhead type sports clubs and in high schools. There is some talk that Putin or his circle are purposely allowing Wagner to fight to the death in order to weaken them and Prigozhin. What kind of country is Russia that it has warlord armies? What normal country allows these to exist?

    This is why there has been no peace yet and why there may be no peace for some time. The two sides are just too far part – there is no overlap between the deal that the Ukrainians would take and the deal that the Russians will give. And yet it is Ukraine’s decision, not ours. Xi is going to try to act as honest broker and push the sides closer together but as long as Russia maintains these kind of unobtainable demands (the horse has left the barn – Ukraine is never voluntarily returning to Russian World, not even as a puppet state or as a Finland unless Putin can roll his tanks to Lviv and he can’t. Not even Finland is Finlandized anymore. The Russians are not powerful enough to Finlandize anyone except Belarus.) he’s going to come up empty handed.

  139. raga10 says:
    @R.G. Camara

    1) NATO was attempting to put long-range missles in Ukraine to threaten major Russian cities;

    Lies and propaganda with not a shred of evidence you could produce to support them. NATO wasn’t installing any missiles in Ukraine, in fact NATO countries like Germany were doing everything they could to keep Ukraine out of NATO.

    (2) the mass looting and corruption the U.S. was doing in Ukraine, including installing a pro-U.S. puppet regime;

    Even if true, how is that any of Putin’s business? Also, pro-US puppets are problematic but pro-Russian puppets like Lukashenko are fine with you, I presume?

    and (3) the Donbass and Crimea.

    Crimea?!? Putin had to invade Ukraine in 2022 because he illegally annexed Crimea in 2014? Does that make any sense?

    • Agree: Pixo
    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  140. @Jack D

    I think what is going on is that the American right has lost its mind. They are beginning to see that Trump was perhaps their high water mark and that under the current system they have nothing to look forward to, especially in the blue states but perhaps the whole country to the extent that it is controlled by the Democrat Permanent Government. From now on, people like them are going to be a despised minority and our new national heroes will be trannies and black ladies whose hair you must not touch.

    This recent article discusses the effects of high immigration, diversity, and one-party rule in California. The rest of the USA is heading the same way.

    https://www.unz.com/article/unherd-california-swamped-by-third-world-corruption-why-and-what-can-be-done/

    (The reality is not that bad but this is how they perceive it).

    It is not “that bad” in that the existence of white Americans will still be tolerated. It is “that bad” in that, without a shot being fired, the USA will have become a one-party state. After that it will be impossible to change anything by voting. It will also be impossible to change anything by any other means, because the country will retain the trappings of democracy, any opposition to which would be treason.

    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @Jack D
  141. Jack D says:
    @Cagey Beast

    The Russians are clearly lying as usual. Drones don’t fall into the water as a result of “sharp maneuvering”. What does that even means?

    The Russia, either accidentally or on purpose (there is a long Russian aviation tradition of ramming enemy aircraft) made contact with the drone or its prop with one of their aircraft and the drone went down as a result.

    Russia has no right to declare international waters to be “no fly zones”.

    The Russians were fortunate that this was a drone and no Americans were killed or this would be a much bigger deal. They are probably going to get away with this once but if they make this a habit it’s going to be trouble. The US has purposely held off on arming the Ukrainians with longer range weapons so far and declined to declare Ukraine a Russian “no fly” zone as Ukraine asked, but if Russia pisses off the Pentagon sufficiently this may changed.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  142. shale boi says:

    I’m seven minutes into watching L.A. Confidential, based on a recommendation from here (and it’s massive IMDB rating). But I switched off. Boring. Voiceover. Multiple main characters. A bunch of stylized actors preening. Story not immersive.

    • Replies: @Matra
  143. @Jack D

    If Putin didn’t understand before that (outside of the Donbas) Ukraine doesn’t really want to be part of Russian World, he must understand it now and accept the reality that it is not going back to the Russian sphere in his lifetime.

    I don’t think he understands it now. I have read his last two big speeches & these are babbling of an incoherent mind, similar to Hitler’s will.

    As I said before, after poring over his speech- this is an absurdist fantasy.

    Putin’s “thoughts” are- if he is sincere – these:

    Russia is neither “white” nor non-white. He doesn’t think in these categories. For instance, he’s constantly drumming against Western imperialism, which he thinks began with the Age of Exploration.

    His chief devil is not very well defined, but it seems to be a combination of Western Christianity (Catholicism & Protestantism) & now, perhaps, Anglo-Saxonistan which is, in his fantasies, dominated by WASPs. It is not clear how he treats other Europeans, but his image of the West is confusing- it seems that “West” is a combination of Poles, French, Germans & Swedes, Russia’s historical invaders; on the other hand, he easily switches between centuries & mixes the 17th C with the 21st C.

    Putin’s narrative is also contradictory. It is not clear whether historical invaders of Russia (Poles, French, Germans) are now the threatening & potentially Russia-conquering West, or just puppets of the global WASP power. Anyway, all Western Christians, from the Portuguese to the English, are racists. Putin’s version of the contemporary world is that “good guys” are colored races (China, India, Africa, blacks in the US,..). Russia, in his view, is not “white” (whatever this may mean).

    As far as religious culture goes, Western Christianity is the enemy. It is only Eastern, Orthodox Christianity that he thinks of “defending”. Also, his reinterpretation of history is laughable: he states that historical “friends”, buddies in Russia are Eastern Orthodox, Jews and Muslims (with a smattering of Buddhists).

    For anyone who knows anything about the history of Russia- this is absurd. Before Communism, Jews and Muslims were considered irreconcilable aliens & enemies. He’s lying about trivial facts.

    Then, his fantasies about WASPs, now, have nothing to do with reality. He fantasizes that tranny, gay & Globohomo ideology is basically WASPy, or “white” tool for domination over colored races, Russia & a sword wielded by US “whites” to conquer the world & to exploit it.

    Globohomo ideology is, in his definition, the invention of globalist Anglo-Saxonists to subdue Africans, Asians & other coloreds- and, of course, Russia, which is a natural ally of the East and South.

    His world-view is simply idiotic.

    It can be easily decoded if one reads his last two big speeches & watches short videos (when he says, in translation, Christianity, he means only Eastern Orthodoxy; also, when he talks about races, and white race especially, he doesn’t include Russians in the definition).

    Putin’s core world-view is that of an Eastern Orthodox Euro-Asian Jihadist- basically, this is the same as Dugin- consumed with hatred of not just post-modern Globohomo West, but of the historical European identity.

    [MORE]

    As far as Dugin goes, he is one of those people who get carried away with grandiose, ill-defined schemes; who lack a capability for serious critical thinking; whose world-view is a goulash of indigestible and contradictory ideas; who is basically a marginal figure who has, due to confluence of circumstances, achieved prominence way beyond his actual achievements, let alone influence.

    Having read many of his sources (Evola, Guenon, Schmitt, Eliade, Spengler, Heidegger, Kalajić, …), I can say, with certainty- these people are reactionary fantasists when it comes to life & politics. Some are scholars of genius -Eliade, who, when it comes to society & politics turns instantly into infantile blabbermouth; Evola is an interesting thinker in 2-3 books, but remains a completely bonkers popularizer of a subjectively interpreted theosophists’ theory of “races”; Heidegger’s mystique is rooted in his links with Nazism (Nazism is sexy), but his influence on phenomenology & existentialism- which was real- waned as these movements disintegrated – after the countercultural 60s, when wider audience could read complex & nuanced metaphysical works, East & West & which dwarfed everything Heidegger had ever written, making him a rather miserable epigone of philosophia perennis…

    I could go on & on, but it’s futile.

    Dugin, as well as most of his sources, shares emotional attachment to Fascist myth. Fascism is, essentially, a cartoon & disfigured vulgar ideological interpretation of mysteries of re-birth. High traditional, archetypal cults of rebirth one can find in Greek initiation mysteries (and elsewhere, but these are the most developed & richest in content); lower, or more down-to-earth examples are warrior cults like Germanic Maennerbunde, which Himmler & SS tried to imitate and renew.

    And here lies the difference between Greek initiates & modern Fascist ideologues. Greeks thought that anyone is potentially a god in human clothing & the whole business of initiatory drama is to inflame the divine spark and transform the initiate into a godlike human. So they longed for human-superhuman life. On the other hand, Fascists & their confused sympathizers were disgusted with the ordinary, humdrum reality of modern life which they saw as nothing but corruption and wanted to return to some mythic, archaic & superior order which in reality never existed. What the (quasi)Fascist mind desires is a combination of will to power, abhorrence of “progress” & strong fixation on the mythical past which existed only in their skulls.

    In short, Fascists are basically Romantics who have not matured & have remained stuck in a world-view of a mythized past, strongly colored by will to dominate & create a new world that is, in their mind, current realization of an uncorrupted blissful past. Such Romanticism is, of course, impervious to critical analysis & historical investigation- for them, the future is the golden archaic age.

    Dugin is a typical mental mess. He not only idealizes, but completely fabricates & misinterprets Russian history & civilization; he unsuccessfully tries to heal his own weaknesses by adoration of power & a cartoon concept of his own nation- supremely capable & deserving to rule the world (or most of it), at least in his mind- without taking into account what the real, empirical world is about; which & where values of different civilizations lie; what do modern people of various cultures actually want…

    Putin has absorbed & remade some of these ideas. It is wrong to think of his world-views just in terms of (geo)politics & power politics. What he spouts in his speeches is some kind of sincere belief, a grotesque religion.

    To paraphrase a Polish philosopher: all this delusional adoration of power & domination has shown to be, as is the case with similar delusions, a farcical side of human bondage.

  144. Jack D says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    If they just keep doing what they are doing long enough they can’t fail to win completely

    Depends what you mean by “long enough”. At their current rate of advance they should reach Kyiv sometime around 2092. Because there are apparently insane warmongers like you who still have Putin’s ear, there’s not going to be a peace deal until Russia completely collapses. The list of countries that “couldn’t fail to win completely” and yet in fact failed to win at all is very long. It’s OK to loudly thump your chest like this in the hope of persuading your enemy to take a deal but if you drink your own Kool Aid (maybe with a little vodka in it) you are doomed.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  145. @Voltarde

    Have you ever actually read any of President Putin’s many detailed speeches on economic and social policy? Have you ever actually observed him in lengthy, detailed interviews (e.g., Oliver Stone’s) and other impromptu debates and discussions?

    To be fair to Jack, you can’t both post at the rate he does (926 comments year to date) AND be well-read and informed.

    • Thanks: Voltarde
  146. @Jack D

    Russia agrees with you that a diplomatic solution isn’t out there. They just stated that they will pursue a military solution.

    You’re correct that Ukraine will keep fighting, but you’re wrong that we’ll be able to keep supporting them. We don’t have the equipment and munitions.

  147. @Anonymous

    Also, both Manchuria and the Ukraine industrialized earlier than their Chinese and Russian neighbors respectively, but both have since been overtaken by their formerly lagging neighbors, and are now themselves the laggards.

  148. @Jack D

    At their current rate of advance they should reach Kyiv sometime around 2092.

    The “acres under control” count is currently irrelevant. Once the Ukrainian army is destroyed the Russians can go as fast or as slow as they want in occupying the country. Talking points aside, I’m sure you know that.

    Because there are apparently insane warmongers like you who still have Putin’s ear, there’s not going to be a peace deal until Russia completely collapses.

    You are right. There will not no peace deal because Russia is never going to “collapse.” As I mentioned, “warmongers” like me would have taken advantage of the peace overtures by the Russians in 2015, 2021 and April ’22. “Peace-lovers” like you rejected them all because you thought (incorrectly) that you could fight it out and win.

    Now the only way to a lasting peace is through a complete Russian victory. (Although the neocon are no doubt already drawing up plans for funding an Afghanistan-style guerilla war.) The complete destruction of Ukraine is just neocon chickens coming home to roost.

    • Replies: @HA
  149. Anonymous[366] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D

    The Russians are clearly lying as usual. Drones don’t fall into the water as a result of “sharp maneuvering”. What does that even means?

    The New York Times is reporting that intelligence sources say is was some pro-Donbas group, 6 men on a yacht flying a kite, that brought the MQ-9 Reaper drone down.

  150. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Give me a break, he’s a definitely paid plant fed.

    Every time some kind of profitable military-industrial complex event is in the news, he’s shilling for it like its his job to an audience on Unz.com that is very much anti-war and and anti-foreign war. Or he’s defending fed agents when they get accused of true actions, such as causing the Jan 6th riots or murdering the people in Waco to an audience that largely believes the opposite.

    Who would take that kind of abuse and keep coming back for more? A paid fed plant, designed to derail, disinform, and demoralize the opposition and (they hope) to convince some well-meaning but unconvinced stragglers of the neocon/neolib position through blatant lying.

    In short, the only debate is which fed agency/contractor he works for, not if.

    • Replies: @Pixo
  151. raga10 says:
    @Dumbo

    Ukrainians are Russians. They speak the same language, share the same ethnicity, eat the same food.

    Ukrainians are not Russian and don’t speak the same language. Ukrainian is its own language with its own alphabet (not exactly the same as Russian), altough many Ukrainians speak Russian the same way many Dutch people speak pretty fluent English out of necessity but that doesn’t make them English.

    Arguably though Russians are Ukrainian since Russia itself is just an offshot of medieval Kievan Rus – a state, as the name would suggest, that was centered around Kiev.

  152. The difference between the SMO and the Korean conflict was that the US, who instigated the Korean conflict, bombed every North Korean city to rubble and killed roughly 15% of the Nork population, soldiers and civilians alike, which is a very good reason why the Norks go to great pains to keep a credible deterrent against a repeat.

    The similarity between the two is that the US cleaved off territory that it wished to keep on its side by installing a puppet regime and then using that puppet regime to provoke attack by its adversary.

    Getting the theme here, Steve?

  153. Muggles says:
    @PhysicistDave

    The problem with people like Dave here is that they believe in simplistic world views.

    Some on Unz see Jews behind everything (including the “US Hegemon”). Others merely the US as a political entity (or both).

    I’m as much of an opponent of US world meddling as anyone here, but to always default to a “everyone is a puppet of the US unless they are an announced foe” is silly and wrong.

    This scenario imagines all other nations are mere puppets or helpless foes of the US Giant.

    Noble Xi and Putin are the only ones who have the bravery to resist!

    What rubbish! Does Dave or any other advocates of this idea actually know anyone in China or Russia? Anyone who isn’t some govt. internet troll? Anyone brave enough to escape the Hegemon and find freedom in China or Russia? Other than poor Ed Snowden, all the escapees are coming from the other direction.

    Invading and meddling with neighbors and others has been a long Russian/USSR/Russian tendency going back to the Czars. Claiming false narratives is Putin’s stock in trade.

    You don’t have to back endless war in Ukraine to see the foolishness of the idea that the US is the Great Satan.

    Reality is far more complex.

    Are there any real democratic voices or political opposition in Russia or China (not in exile)? Any?

    There are plenty of Biden and/or US foreign policy critics here, and democratic political opposition to Biden, despire Merritt Garland’s police state goons. The FSB they are not. Not yet.

    But for too many here, willing blindness makes nasty dictators into heroes.

    Zelensky didn’t invade Russia. Portraying poor Vlad Putin as some helpless victim of NATO is laughable and sick. Who’s next, poor Chinese strongman Xi? Kin Jon Un?

    I’m in favor of a truce/settlement in Ukraine. Perhaps Xi will provide some cover for Putin to pull back and accept his fate as a would-be czar, now weakling loser.

    Of course, such thinking requires more brain cells than comic book heroes and villains.

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
    , @Ennui
  154. @raga10

    lol. Wow, the feds are really out in force this week! Must be either to gear up for another Nordstream false flag or to try to distract from the epic banking collapse in the last 7 days!

    NATO wasn’t installing any missiles in Ukraine, in fact NATO countries like Germany were doing everything they could to keep Ukraine out of NATO.

    Note the fed false equivalency: “putting missiles in a country” v. “letting them join NATO.”

    Russia publicly stated that Ukraine in NATO was a hard line. So weasels like raga10’s masters publicly claimed they weren’t allowing Ukraine in NATO but installed a puppet government and tried to sneak missiles in. Russia wasn’t fooled and invaded.

    Nice try with the lie, fed!

    Even if true, how is that any of Putin’s business?

    “Why should Russia care if one of their potential great opponents corrupts and controls the country next door to Russia, which is also filled with Russians in certain areas and is also a vital food market for Russia?”

    You beclown yourself, fed.

    Also, pro-US puppets are problematic but pro-Russian puppets like Lukashenko are fine with you, I presume?

    As your masters made clear during the Trump-Russia Hoax, fed, interfering in another country’s elections is the WORST THING EVA. Therefore, installing a pro-U.S. puppet government via an actual coup is the WORST THING EVA and the U.S. is to blame, full stop.

    Crimea?!? Putin had to invade Ukraine in 2022 because he illegally annexed Crimea in 2014? Does that make any sense?

    Putin moved to secure an important Russian port that the pro-U.S. corrupt puppet Ukrainian government was making noise about taking back while protecting Russians being shelled by the pro-U.S. corrupt puppet Ukrainian government.

    And you’re done. Move along, fed, you’ve been exposed.

  155. I much enjoy the Jack D – Bardon Kaldian counterpoint which occupies so much of this thread.

    But I must ask – where are HA and John Johnson? Aren’t they due on shift yet?

    Together they could really boogie.

  156. Matra says:
    @shale boi

    L.A. Confidential is a poor man’s Chinatown. It has a cheesy happy ending too.

  157. @Nicholas Stix

    But why?

    I wonder too.

    Do you have an alternative hypothesis?

    Not one that I can show evidence for. The ethnic animus explanation is popular around here. Maybe there’s something to it. I don’t know.

    All men are to an extent creatures of habit. A lot of these people’s habits were formed in the Cold War, in which context they make sense. Given the opportunity and platform to reassert those habits, they do it, just ’cause that’s what people are like I guess. I think Brzezinski is an example of this, and also probably of ethnic animus. Maybe Bill Kristol is trying to show off for his dad. I don’t know. It’s hard to miss the overrepresentation of Jewish people among the Ukraine mongers. Maybe it’s a sense of solidarity with the Ukraine’s Jewish-tilted government and oligarchs. I doubt they can all be on regime payola (not that the regime can’t afford it, but sharing isn’t their way).

    Maybe it’s one of those things where disparate interests happen to find a common cause: superannuated Cold Warriors, ethnic animusers, war profiteers, tribal fellow-feeling, whatever peculiar neurosis Bill Kristol suffers from, etc.: in other circumstances they could be at each others’ throats, but on this subject they all see a way to benefit themselves, so they wrap themselves in the flag and away we go!

  158. Jack D says:
    @James N. Kennett

    OK, then, maybe it really is that bad, but America’s military and economic destruction and a Russian triumph in Ukraine isn’t going to make it any better. Hopefully the right are not thinking along the self-destructive lines of Hitler in his last days – if I can’t have Germany, then no one can.

    The more optimistic view is that they think that by “increasing the contradictions” you bring on the collapse of the current regime (which otherwise you have no chance of defeating in its current iteration – see Jan 6) and then you ride in to pick up the pieces (or at least a good sized piece of your own).

    Chances of success are very low. Once you scramble the deck in this way, you never know who will emerge as the victor. Probably not you, if you even survive the carnage. Maybe someone you never heard of. Maybe the most bloodthirsty forces. Whatever remains may be highly damaged, many of your loved ones will be dead, etc. Stupid plan – even if you “win” you lose.

    You might think that nothing could be worse than to live as a despised minority in your own country. You are wrong – things can ALWAYS be worse.

    • Agree: James N. Kennett
    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
  159. @Muggles

    Muggles wrote to me:

    What rubbish! Does Dave or any other advocates of this idea actually know anyone in China or Russia?

    Yes, I do. I married the daughter of Chinese immigrants.

    I therefore know lots and lots of Chinese, many immigrants as well as Chinese nationals.

    And I know that their contempt for Americans like you is boundless.

    Muggles also wrote to me:

    Some on Unz see Jews behind everything (including the “US Hegemon”). Others merely the US as a political entity (or both).

    If you look back through my posts, you will see that I have argued again and again and again that of course Jews do not control the US. Most people in power are just not Jewish.

    Besides which, there are many “righteous Jews,” a number of whom I have known myself, such as, say, Norm Finkelstein or the late Murray Rothbard.

    On the other hand, what we might call “official Jews,” such as the ADL are evil monsters who support crimes against humanity in, for example, the Mideast. And Judaism itself is of course a profoundly evil religion that seems to have invented the idea of mass killing for religious purposes — see, for example, Exodus 32: 26-29 (see here). The ancient Israelites invented religious holocausts, which were horrifically turned on their own descendants in the twentieth century.

    I do not hold all modern Jews responsible for the great evil of their ancestors.

    But I do hold responsible those modern Jews who celebrate the evil of their ancestors and who think that the evil of the Hebrew Bible justifies the crimes they have committed against humanity.

    I am happy to condemn Nazis, whether in Berlin or Kiev, and White nationalists, and all of that ilk.

    But, by the same token, I am obligated to condemn those Jews who behave in precisely the same way and who revere Holy Scriptures that encourage crimes against humanity.

    I cannot be intimidated by nasty little thugs like you who cry “Anti-Semite! Anti-Semite” when I apply the same moral standards to Jews that I apply to Germans and Cambodians and Rwandans.

    The Palestinians must be avenged. Jews must be held to account by the same standards as any other human beings.

    And right now you are not.

    • Replies: @Muggles
  160. @Nicholas Stix

    Nicholas Stix wrote to Almost Missouri:

    [AM} “neocons have no stop condition other than total defeat of Russia.”

    {NS] But why?

    We’re dancing around the obvious truth because we do not want to be labeled “anti-Semites.”

    Let’s be blunt: for historical and familial reasons, an awful lot of Jews hate, really deeply hate, Eastern Slavs.

    My neighbor is a Jewish immigrant whose dad was born in Ukraine and then lived for a while in Russia before emigrating. My neighbor says the Ukrainians were even worse towards the Jews than the Russians were.

    Needless to say, the Jewish neighbor does not shed any tears over Russians and Ukrainians killing each other by the tens of thousands.

    And a number of the frothing-at-the-mouth warmongers here are indeed Jewish.

    Is that the only cause? No. As you say, there certainly is money to be made. And there are non-Jewish influencers from Eastern Europe who also want to drag the US into their own local feuds — we see some of them here.

    But an awful lot of Jewish neocons have been among the loudest voices for war.

    Again, I know there are “righteous Jews,” such as my late friend Murray Rothbard and Norm Finkelstein, who are completely free of the horrific blood-lust.

    But the Old Testament is a very bloody-minded document, and lots of Jews are raised to revere it.

    That lots of them are bloody-minded in the real world, especially towards groups they see as familial enemies such as the Russians and Ukrainians, should not be a surprise.

    My neighbor (who otherwise is a pretty nice guy) is, alas, not an exception.

    • Agree: TWS
    • Troll: Pixo
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @nebulafox
  161. @Joe Stalin

    Wow, a MSM outlet and a pro-Ukrainian twitter account says the Russians are running out of equipment.

    It must be true!

    Look, maybe you’re right. I’m fine waiting to find out. Btw, you might want to check out Alex Vershinin. He’s retired American military at Harvard, i.e., most definitely not pro-Russia.

    We’ll know by the end of summer who’s right. If the Ukrainians are running out of men and munitions at the rate that I’ve read about, we’ll start to see the cracks by then.

    No need to argue. We’ll know soon enough.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  162. @Almost Missouri

    It might also do to remember here that the neoconservative credo itself has no stop condition. The nonterminating loop is, as it were, built right into the source code. Neocons are true believers in American exceptionalism, true believers in turbo-capitalism, and they’re devoted to the idea that if only they pursue pure, hedonistic freedom of choice with David French-like ferocity, they are sure to reach Utopia someday, no matter how much collateral damage they have to do along the way. If they ever stopped believing, they would have to turn and face all the destruction they’ve wrought, and that’s just too psychologically difficult.

    Neocons are like wealthy urbanites who think that their glittering city is the whole universe; they think that it goes on forever. Even if, in the back of their minds, they know it doesn’t, that fact is of no use to them as long as the city lights still twinkle. It is only within the halo of those lights that their writ extends, so they will do everything to keep them burning, including human sacrifice. And when it all comes crashing down, they will tell themselves that it was still preferable to the “darkness” outside.

    They truly are a death cult and must be destroyed. There is no other way of stopping them.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  163. @R.G. Camara

    Amazingly, he’s not a plant. That’s just who he is.

    No, seriously. Really, he’s not acting.

    Yeah, yeah, I know. It seems impossible that someone would be such a ridiculous stereotype and so completely insane when any subject even tangentially touches on Jews. But that’s just Jack.

    Actually, Jack is incredibly useful. Most whites don’t understand how crazy a certain portion of Jews are. It doesn’t seem possible. Then, you meet Jack. It takes a bit to fully accept it, but once you realize the truth, you understand the world so much better.

    • Replies: @Ennui
  164. @Jack D

    God, I wish that every white goy had to read your posts.

  165. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    The Chicoms and Norks had no respect for international trademarks!

    The US hoops squad looks almost like one of today’s, only shorter:

  166. More comments in mod, thanks

  167. HA says:
    @slumber_j

    “prospects for a compromise would be much better if the current US administration weren’t both pouring fuel on the fire and actively militating against a negotiated settlement.”

    Except for the part about how, at Merkel’s behest, we already tried that approach and it failed spectacularly. So what’s to stop Putin or his mini-Me from coming back in another 5-10 years demanding yet another chunk of Ukraine if the so-called peace advocates get their way and Russia gets to keep Donbass and Crimea? After all, Crimea will never be safe as long as Kherson (its water supplier) is in Ukraine’s hands, so they’ll have to be given that, regardless of the fact that the Russians already blew their shot at holding on to it militarily. In fact, they’ll need Odessa and Nikolaev, too, for similar reasons. Not because they’re greedy land-grabbers, oh no. It’s just because, being the humanitarians they are, they must keep Crimea safe and also because the West just doesn’t understand poor Putin and, hey, let’s not escalate ourselves into anything nuclear, ok? Is that pretty much the gist or am I missing some other pathetic attempt of straw-clutching?

    So yeah, we’ll just keep caving every 5-10 years, and in the next round it’ll be some other chunk of Ukraine that changes maps, or else maybe some chunk of Kazakhstan, or Transnistria, and so on, and don’t forget Taiwan. I mean, if we have to cave to every tantrum-throwing whiner with a nuke, why would we ever say no to China? Or India — or even Pakistan, given that they both have nukes? Do you seriously not see the error in that logic chain?

  168. Their fact that the war profiteers refuse to even seek a ceasefire of any kind is revealing.

    We have an extended family member in the DC area who has been banging on about war with Russia over Ukraine for well over a decade. He worked for Rumsfeld and a more bloodthirsty little goblin you will never meet. He’s a retired Army colonel but a prime example of the officer class hated most by fighting men. This guy spends his time at his job with a military contractor gaming out nuclear war scenarios in which millions of Russians and Ukrainian meat puppets perish.

    Oh, and he was prepping his compound with wells and high tech fencing, etc, starting with Trump’s election. Nobody was better set up for the Plandemic. He is the main reason I am convinced Covid was a failsafe to ensure Trump was not reelected.

    A rabid Trump hater, but really he hates Americans who would deign to elect Trump over the chosen neocon war machine candidate, as if they have any say in who runs this country.

    None of this stuff is accidental. The outcome doesn’t matter for these people, the plight of the Ukrainian people is irrelevant. They are raking in the cash, and that’s what matters.

  169. @PhysicistDave

    And a number of the frothing-at-the-mouth warmongers here are indeed Jewish.

    I see that Alain Finkielkraut was right: Every conspiracy ultimately ends up with “Protocols…”.

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  170. HA says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    “There will not no peace deal because Russia is never going to ‘collapse.’”

    Of course not. Just like Soviet Union will never collapse. Just like the Russian (not to mention the American) effort in Afghanistan will never collapse. Or the one with Japan. Dot, dot, dot.

    Even Stalin’s army might have well have collapsed without all the aid they were getting from the UK and later America. And this time around, that aid is not being directed towards Moscow. So spare me the platitudes about how the Russians are eternally unvanquishable, or how the meatgrinder never ever fails.

  171. Mike Tre says:
    @Colin Wright

    Good guys / bad guys is the Hollywood interpretation of war. In reality, it’s two sides with opposing/conflicting interests.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
  172. Ennui says:
    @Jack D

    Jack,

    What happens when they run out of Ukrainians?

  173. Mike Tre says:
    @HA

    Wow, after a three week absence (last comment feb 23rd), look who shows up the last couple days to push the kovid and You-KKKrane narratives!

    • Replies: @Nicholas Stix
  174. Ennui says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Still bitter about Kishniev on a conscious or subconscious level? That’s my theory.

  175. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous

    Partition along a river sound fair. I suggest the Volga.

    • Replies: @Johann Ricke
  176. @Joe Stalin

    At the end, we’ll se refurbished T-34 in action.

  177. Ennui says:
    @Muggles

    Charles Gordon died in Khartoum. The Boers literally tried running away into the veld, but guess who followed them.

    I love Americans and Anglos who talk about Russians messing with their neighbors for centuries as an indicator of something nefarious. They ignore that said meddling was tit for tat with the exception of the small peoples of Siberia who got treated way worse, btw, than the Poles or Baltic Germans. But these same Western commentators never get around to asking how Rudyard Kipling managed to be born in the Eastern Hemisphere.

  178. @Tiny Duck

    Tiny Duck:

    ‘Russia will lose in the end.’

    I rest my case.

  179. @HA

    So spare me the platitudes about how the Russians are eternally unvanquishable

    They don’t have to be eternally unvanquishable. They only have to outlast the failing state of Ukraine. That shouldn’t be hard.

    • Replies: @HA
  180. Jack D says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    No way the Russians are running out of T-72s and other stuff. Those stories are just Western propaganda. All those photos of demolished tanks on Oryx are just fakes. They are bringing T-62 and other ancient crap out of storage and scrounging for ammo from N. Korea and such just because… because they are just sick of winning and enjoy a challenge. Or something.

  181. @HA

    Even Stalin’s army might have well have collapsed without all the aid they were getting from the UK and later America.

    This is a sober truth.

    Nikita Khrushchev, having served as a military commissar and intermediary between Stalin and his generals during the war, addressed directly the significance of Lend-lease aid in his memoirs:

    I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin’s views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were “discussing freely” among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany’s pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don’t think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.

    • Thanks: HA
  182. HA says:
    @Anonymous

    “President Putin must make a solemn and binding promise that he will never, without provocation, attack, invade or otherwise threaten Ukrainian territory west of the river.”

    Oh, my sides! Yeah, sure — let’s all trust Putin to keep his word. What could possibly go wrong? Just like we all trusted Moscow’s last solemn and binding promise to forever, forever-forever respect Ukraine’s boundaries (I mean, except for the part about sending out little green men and paid agents like “freedom fighter” Strelkov to whip up trouble and hold bogus referenda and so fort).

    And while we’re at it, let’s also make all of Russia’s yellow journalists and their. many stateside trolls and useful idiots promise never to cry “provocation” at every available opportunity. Let’s also make them promise to stop intoning, with dead-eyed zombified children-of-the-corn affect, about how they’re going to bring Alaska “back home”.

    Sounds like a plan.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1572898/Russian-cadets-sing-ll-bring-Alaska-home-song-Putin.html

  183. @Jack D

    Okay, Jack. You’re right.

    We’ll see. I’m happy to wait and see how things turn out on the ground.

    (Btw, I’m not really that much of a Putin fan, though I do like that he’s sticking his finger into the eye of your neocon cousins, but that doesn’t make me care whether the Russians or Ukrainians win. Neither do you give two farts about the Ukrainians. I’m just calling it like I see it. You, OTHO, are about as dispassionate as a Bills or Eagles fan in the playoffs.)

  184. Coemgen says:

    How do you stop ten iSteve’s blog commenters from raping a white girl?

    Throw them a softball question that allows them to expound on how much they deplore non-globalists and non-megalomaniacs.

  185. Anonymous[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @PhysicistDave

    I urge everyone to keep in mind that my friend Bardon is an enemy alien who does not support the best interests of the United States of America. He is a Serbo-Croation, and I remind everyone of what happened in 1914 when the Serbo-Croatians managed to get the West involved in their own regional feuds in Eastern Europe.

    They are trying to do it again.

    Don’t get your knickers in a twist, Dave.

    He’s a Croat living in Croatia commenting on an internet blog. Hardly a devious enemy alien. Just a bored dummy.

    The only country he’s ruining is his own.

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  186. @Vinnyvette

    You the same Wild Geese Howard I see over at Zman?

    Guilty as charged!

    Good for your son for getting out of RPI. Science and engineering salaries top out quickly unless you come up with an idea you can patent and build a business around. You can make a little more doing adult daycare as a manager.

    It is hard to believe Berklee would be less harsh on a White man than RPI, but those are the times we live in.

    • Thanks: Vinnyvette
    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  187. HA says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    “They only have to outlast the failing state of Ukraine. That shouldn’t be hard.”

    And yet, here we are, one year later. I mean, according to virtually unanimous consensus, the failing state of Ukraine shouldn’t have lasted more than a week or two. Most of the rest of the world has realized that Ukraine’s ability to resist is a lot harder than it “shoulda been”, but I take it reality isn’t quite your thing, is it?

    Hey, where’s Ron Unz chiming in to tell us he hasn’t made much of an effort to learn about this issue, but he nonetheless considers Douglas Macgregor to be “extremely credible” when he tells us — for the umpteenth time — that the gloves are about to come off and Russia will have this all wrapped up in another week or so, and this time, he really, really means it?

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  188. @Almost Missouri

    Consider the similar trajectories of Victoria Nuland and Chrystia Freeland, both born and and raised in the West, both students of Russian literature and history at Ivy League schools. Both driven and haunted by something that can best be described as ghosts from the past, as if they’re trying to resolve some sort of generational trauma. Something beyond the typical neocon ideology seems to be driving these Ukraine folks.

  189. @HA

    according to virtually unanimous consensus, the failing state of Ukraine shouldn’t have lasted more than a week or two

    Why are Ukraine propagandists so enamored of this talking point — that the CIA and MSM said early on that Ukraine might fold early, so that means it will win now. (And, no, Putin never ‘predicted’ or ‘expected’ to overrun all of Ukraine in a week or two. U.S. propaganda bots constantly saying it doesn’t make it true.) Losing fast or losing slow is still losing.

    • Agree: Cagey Beast, Mark G.
    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @HA
  190. Anonymous[304] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    Slavs are really utter trash. The world doesn’t owe you shit. Go f. yourself.

    Sure, Slavs are the problem. Not Westerners, who are wrecking the world, and who have been doing their best to murder Europe (and America, for that matter) for decades now.

  191. Anon 2 says:
    @AndrewR

    The Central European part of the E.U. (i.e. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia,
    Hungary, and the Baltic states) have so far very successfully resisted
    both the Islamic influx and the globohomo pressure coming from
    Brussels.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  192. Anon[333] • Disclaimer says:

    Every time you ask the pro-Russia shills why Russia is right and Ukraine is wrong, they start complaining about things that have nothing to do with Russia or Ukraine. I’m mad about America(and don’t get me wrong there are a lot of things to be legitimately angry about) so I’m going to shill a foreign regime and not even get paid for it. Madness.

    • Agree: Jack D
  193. • Replies: @Jack D
  194. Mike Tre says:
    @Almost Missouri

    I was a crewman, crew chief, and section leader for the Marine AAVP7A1 RAM R/S, a mechanized amphibious assault vehicle / troop transport.

    You know what defeats any tracked vehicle? A well placed $100 spool of concertina wire. It gets tangled in the drive sprockets and becomes wound so tight that is it literally shears through the seals of the final drive hubs, leading to seized gearboxes. Even if the crew stops the tank before that point, now you have crewman outside the disabled tank attempting to cut away the concertina wire.

    I’ve noticed proponents from both sides dick measuring when it comes to tank warfare. It’s obsolete. With modern weapons guidance systems, tanks are basically sitting ducks anywhere. They are even more vulnerable in urban areas because they can be attacked from overhead with primitive Molotov cocktails or IEDs. and cannot maneuver.

    It’s clear Russia’s strategy has been remarkably effective. They understood from the get go that aircraft and armor are basically expensive cannon fodder and have stuck to patient, accurate and consistent, and inexpensive artillery missions.

  195. Anonymous[132] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Why would anybody here be interested in comments on a Serbian article? Why would even Serbs care? What’s next, youtube comments?

    Why are you even so worked up about this, instead of worrying about Croatia being absolutely flooded with immigrants as we speak?

    I can understand empathizing with Ukrainians, and I get that you’re basically an HDZ bot, but you seem obsessed.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  196. Jack D says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    Sure. Putin planned to still be fighting after a year and to have less territory now than he had a year ago. Everything is proceeding according to plan.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  197. @Anon 2

    The Central European part of the E.U. (i.e. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia,
    Hungary, and the Baltic states) have so far very successfully resisted
    both the Islamic influx and the globohomo pressure coming from
    Brussels.

    But not the impulse to demand that others call them by stupid names like “Czechia”, which is alien to English orthography, dysphonious, and so bad they don’t use it themselves in Česko. At least Belarus– i.e., White Russia– makes us use their own name, like Myanmar or Mumbai.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  198. Anonymous[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Paleo Liberal

    I am old enough to remember when the “Serbo-Croatian “ identity was being promoted.

    Until it wasn’t.

    You mean language. The identity being promoted was Yugoslav.

  199. @Jack D

    Partition along a river sound fair. I suggest the Volga.

    Surely the Amur is a better choice. That way Russia doesn’t have to be surrounded by a dozen countries.

    • LOL: Twinkie
  200. Jack D says:
    @Ennui

    What happens when they run out of Russians? We’ll see who blinks first.

    It would be nice if the Russians went home on their own but if they won’t then Ukraine will have to keep fighting for their survival.

  201. @Jack D

    The Russians are not powerful enough to Finlandize anyone except Belarus.)

    Even that is because Luka needs Russian subsidies to stay in power.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
  202. @HA

    So youre saying that Russia has never collapsed? Agreed.

  203. @Jack D

    Sure. Putin planned to still be fighting after a year and to have less territory now than he had a year ago. Everything is proceeding according to plan.

    Putin presumably planned to spoil an imminent Ukrainian offensive on the Donbas and to force a quick deal that include independence or autonomy for Donbas, ceding Russian control of Crimea, and probably that Ukraine would never join NATO. His plan almost worked. The war was almost over by early April with a deal in Istanbul along those lines. But we (the U.S. and U.K.) torpedoed the deal.

    Take that Putler! We prevented your plan from working! So we win!

    But what’s that saying: “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.” Our stupid prize is that we forced Russia to fight longer and get a bigger victory. It has cost us hundreds of billions, destroyed the nation of Ukraine, and punctured our global image of military invincibility. But that’s a small price to pay for the childish emotional satisfaction of thinking we “owned” Putin.

    • Agree: Chrisnonymous
    • Replies: @HA
  204. Jack D says:
    @Cagey Beast

    Russians are shameless liars. They know we have video but they lie anyway.

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  205. HA says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    “Why are Ukraine propagandists so enamored of this talking point — that the CIA and MSM said early on that Ukraine might fold early, so that means it will win now.”

    Not just the CIA and MSM. Trolls like yourself assured us that — what’s the phrase they used? Oh yeah, they said “it shouldn’t be hard.” Yeah, right.

    Whereas, unlike Douglas Macgregor and his fans, Ron Unz and otherwise, I myself have never claimed to possess crystal ball telling me what will happen in Ukraine. In particular, I’ve never said that it will win now, and have every confidence that without the West’s backing Ukraine might well have fallen already, just like Stalin’s army would have been trounced some four score years ago as Bardon Kaldian noted upthread.

    In other words, your own spectacularly failed predictions are not going to be improved by comparing them against some bogus straw-man prediction you wish I would have made so as to make you seem less of a fool.

    Moreover, Putin certainly did publicly predict a year ago (almost to the day), so as to assure Russian mothers, that conscripts “are not and will not be needed to carry out his “special” little military operation (and boy, has it been special). How did that pan out?

    In other words, stop trying to lie to my face, you pathetic troll. Putin and his goons did indeed expect this to be a walk in the park. I mean, get a clue:

    Russian invasion plans, obtained by The New York Times, show that the military expected to sprint hundreds of miles across Ukraine and triumph within days. Officers were told to pack their dress uniforms and medals in anticipation of military parades in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv…

    During a meeting in March with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett of Israel, Mr. Putin admitted that the Ukrainians were tougher “than I was told,” according to two people familiar with the exchange. “This will probably be much more difficult than we thought….”

    Service members told him that “victory in such a situation is impossible,” he said, but their superiors told them not to worry. A war would be a “walk in the park,” they were told.

  206. @Jack D

    Jack D, armchair patriot. When Ukraine is down to 60-year-olds and 16-year-olds, please volunteer your services. You can take Sailer’s kid with you too. Since Sailer thinks throwing your life away for GAE is dulce et decorum, he should be happy to see both of you go.

    • Replies: @James B. Shearer
  207. It would be nice if the Russians went home on their own but if they won’t then Ukraine will have to keep fighting for their survival

    It would be nice if feds like yourself weren’t warmongerers trying to re-take over Ukraine to install your missles and loot the country but if you won’t we Americans will have to keep fighting for our survival.

  208. Dude — Get out of here with that made up, retarded NYT propaganda. The NYT says the Russian Army got its invasion orders at the last second and was therefore unprepared to launch. That doesn’t mean Putin thought he’d win in days. It only means that he didn’t have much time to plan ahead and make advance preparations.

    But the clown-show at NYT think they know his super-duper secret thoughts, anyway. They are nothing but low-IQ deep state shills misinforming the gullible class.

    More importantly, even if Putin was over-optimistic, so what? I still don’t get why you deep state cheerleaders think his private psychological expectations on Feb. 24, 2022 somehow provide support for your plan to fight a losing war to the last Ukrainian.

  209. ATBOTL says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    When Jack D started posting here, he told us he was part of some organized neocon group that was trying to influence conservatives to get back on the zio-plantation. He even posted a link to their site. It’s was some crappy blog. He’s not a paid agent, he’s just a retired neocon with too much time to be annoying online.

    BTW, what happened to “Whiskey,” the original neocon here? I was the one who identified him as a single poster by calling the author of his comments “the long winded neocon.” That was when most commenters didn’t bother to use names, when this blog had it’s own site. After others started calling him that, he choose the name “Whiskey” as part of his transparently fake “Scotch-Irish” persona. For a while, “Scotch-Irish” was being used here as a humorous euphemism for jews.

    • Thanks: The Anti-Gnostic
  210. @Ennui

    Ha. Jack (and the neocons) cares as much about the Ukrainians as a guy who runs cock fights cares about the roosters.

  211. @Jack D

    What cracks me up is how this whole discussion is trapped in the the 20th century mindset.

    You’ll notice that it’s a bunch of whites and Jews bickering. (Guiltily as charged, btw.) Where are the Asians or Indians, even the “American” versions?

    They’re not here because they don’t care.

    That’s the future, Jack. A bunch of peoples who don’t care about you or your grandparents who lived in Ukraine or, gasp, the Holocaust story.

    Enjoy debating the dumb white goys. At least, they engage with you. The groups coming up don’t care enough to even talk to you.

    • Agree: Ennui, JohnnyWalker123
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  212. HA says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    “It has cost us hundreds of billions, destroyed the nation of Ukraine, and punctured our global image of military invincibility.”

    Say what? Yeah, I’m sure that agreeing to support Ukraine once Russia initiated its land-grab — as we had earlier promised — was what punctured that “military invincibility” you speak of. Yeah, sure.

    I mean, OK, there was that little “setback” we had in Vietnam, and then those “bad optics” displayed in Black Hawk Down, and then there was that more recent show of military “vincibility” we put on in Afghanistan, but what really made us seem weak in comparison to those minor pin-pricks was allowing a country one quarter Russia’s size to stand up to its bullying, just as we had promised. You keep telling yourself that. It explains a lot about the rest of your posting.

    “The NYT says the Russian Army got its invasion orders at the last second and was therefore unprepared to launch.”

    Do try and stay on point. Getting orders at the last second still doesn’t explain why the military nonetheless expected to sprint “hundreds of miles across Ukraine and triumph within days.” It still doesn’t explain why Putin himself admitted that the Ukrainians were “tougher than I was told.” Getting your orders at the last second probably should have prompted some Russian commanders to be more cautious about their prospects of an easy victory. But their hapless soldiers were still assured this would be a “walk in the park”. The NYT made all that up, you say? Even if that were true, it still wouldn’t explain why, several weeks later, Putin was still loudly and very publicly assuring Russian mothers that no military conscripts would be needed in his botched military boondoggle. Did the NY Times make that up, too? Because I don’t recall any of the trolls complaining about deep fake Youtube videos at the time.

    Next time, read and address the points being made instead of trying to deflect with another rousing cheer of “we hate the New York Times.” It won’t work with anyone who’s paying attention.

    “I still don’t get why you deep state cheerleaders think his private psychological expectations on Feb. 24, 2022 somehow provide support for your plan to fight a losing war to the last Ukrainian.”

    It doesn’t have to prove that Ukraine will win. It just proves that the Putin trolls are feckless idiots. As I already told you, I’m certainly not predicting Ukraine will win. Try and remedy your “L”, before addressing theirs.

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  213. @Bardon Kaldian

    My Serbo-Croatian buddy Bardon Kaldian wrote to me:

    [Dave] And a number of the frothing-at-the-mouth warmongers here are indeed Jewish.

    [BK] I see that Alain Finkielkraut was right: Every conspiracy ultimately ends up with “Protocols…”.

    I sincerely want to thank you for proving my point.

    Anyone can say whatever they want about White Gentiles or even Blacks, but even the slightest criticism of (some) Jews and there are immediate cries of: Anti-Semistism! Anti-Smistism!

    I did not say that all of the insane war-mongers here are Jews: I also specifically alluded to those crooks who are in it for the money as well as to East-European crazies like you who want to drag the rest of the world into your crazy little feuds. Here is exactly what I said:

    Is that the only cause? No. As you say, there certainly is money to be made. And there are non-Jewish influencers from Eastern Europe who also want to drag the US into their own local feuds — we see some of them here.

    There are various different groups who are pushing for Armageddon in Ukraine: East European crazes like you, the military-industrial complex that makes money off of it, and, yes, some Jews (I made clear not all Jews) who bear familial grudges against both Russians and Ukrainians — I gave my neighbor as a very specific example of this.

    You know as well as I do that this is true.

    But all you can do is scream:

    Every conspiracy ultimately ends up with “Protocols…”

    You are a thug, BK.

    And you prove my point.

    You are an enemy alien: you are not an American, but you are trying to draw my country into your centuries-long regional feuds that in no way concern any loyal Americans.

    We are no longer intimidated by nasty little thugs like you and your attempt to make Americans feel guilty for putting America first, just as you put your own little shithole country first.

    And we are no longer intimidated by your little baby cries of Anti-Semitism when we try to have grown-up talks about who is pushing for World War.

    The only proper response that any loyal American can have to enemies of the United States like you is: “Go f**^ yourselves!”

    All loyal Americans sincerely hope that people like you end up dead.

    We don’t need you, we don’t want you, and we hope you die.

    • Agree: ATBOTL
    • Thanks: JimDandy, Verymuchalive
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  214. So, the Russians knocked one of our drones out of the sky over the Black Sea. Well, the next time the Russians fly a drone over the Gulf of Mexico, we should retaliate by knocking that drone out of the sky.

  215. 216 says: • Website

    o/t

    #BlueTyranny

  216. Dube says:
    @Hodag

    The US won the war when we blew up Nordstream. So let’s bug out.

    Neatly argued, if the Nordstream decision is seen as a countermove.

  217. @HA

    My little buddy HAsbara wrote to Hypnotoad666:

    Say what? Yeah, I’m sure that agreeing to support Ukraine once Russia initiated its land-grab — as we had earlier promised — was what punctured that “military invincibility” you speak of. Yeah, sure.

    I mean, OK, there was that little “setback” we had in Vietnam, and then those “bad optics” displayed in Black Hawk Down, and then there was that more recent show of military “vincibility” we put on in Afghanistan, but what really made us seem weak in comparison to those minor pin-pricks was allowing a country one quarter Russia’s size to stand up to its bullying, just as we had promised.

    What is this “we,” kemosabe???

    You are an enemy alien, not part of “we.”

    You are an enemy of the United States of America who is trying to draw my country into your centuries-long family feuds in Eastern Europe.

    And “we” Americans never agreed to defend Ukraine.

    Yeah, yeah, the “Budapest Memos.” Several separate agreements, none of which committed any of the signatories to come to Ukraine’s aid in the event that the Pesty Memos were broken by one party or another (yes, I know: there was the promise to go to the UN Security Council — meaningless, since Russia holds a veto there).

    Indeed, a good case can be made that the US abrogated the Pesty Memo by orchestrating the overthrow of the legitimate government of Ukraine and that Russia is acting in accord with the Pesty Memo by defending Ukrainians in the Donbass against the murderous actions of the US proxies in Kiev.

    The US attacked Ukraine using neo-Nazi proxies in Kiev: Russia is defending Ukraine.

    In any case, under the US Constitution (yes, I know, as an enemy alien you don’t know about that!), the Pesty Memo is not binding in any way at all on the US, since it was not ratified by the US Senate.

    Just an empty piece of paper.

    Now, getting back to you, HAsbara: since you are an enemy alien, you have no standing to say what America should do.

    I understand that you think that American intervention in Ukraine will serve the interests of the nasty little shithole country to which you are loyal.

    Probably will.

    But it does not serve the interests of the United States of America.

    Loyal Americans just do not care about you and your little shithole country, HAsbara.

    Just between you and me: we all sort of hope you all just drop dead.

    • Agree: Ennui
    • Replies: @HA
  218. AndrewR says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    It fits with Czechoslovakia and Slovakia. And Slovenia and Croatia and Serbia and Bulgaria. And non-Slavic countries Syria, Georgia, Albania and Armenia, three of which have completely different endonyms. L So you’re definitely lying when you say it’s alien to our orthology. The dysphonia thing is subjective but I don’t find it “dysphonious” [speaking of alien] at all.

    I also don’t understand why we can’t just call them Czesko but you seem oddly upset about the name Czechia.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  219. @Jack D

    Jack D wrote to Cagey Beast:

    Russians are shameless liars. They know we have video but they lie anyway.

    As opposed to the US Deep State that always — always! — tells the truth!

    I mean, when it comes to the Nordstream pipeline, who ya gonna believe: the decorated investigative journalist Sy Hersh who has an inside source who laid out in detail what happened… or those models of truthfulness who sold us the Russian Collusion Hoax, the Hunter laptop lies, etc.?

    Of course, the US Deep State would never, ever lie!

    All we want Jack is: America First!

    You’ve got some familial gripe with the Eastern Slavs, Jack? You think it is some sort of vengeance for how they treated your great-great granddad a century ago to encourage them to kill each other now?

    Your problem, Jack, not ours.

    We want to stop pouring billions into that shithole country, we want to stop risking nuclear war, we want to stop driving the rest of the world into the arms of the Communist Party of China.

    And, oh yeah, we kinds think it would be nice if the killing in Ukraine stopped and if there were a negotiated peace that accepted the right of self-determination of peoples as enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter as applied to the peoples of the Donbass.

    America First, Jack.

    An idea you can never grasp because you do not put America first.

    • Agree: R.G. Camara
  220. HA says:
    @PhysicistDave

    “You are an enemy of the United States of America who is trying to draw my country into your centuries-long family feuds in Eastern Europe.”

    So says the guy who has openly admitted on this site that he has seriously discussed with his ethnic Chinese wife his desire to move to the land of her forbears, but deciding, no, it would be too much fuss learning Mandarin better, not to mention the picayune yet somehow insurmountable minutia of learning how to enroll his daughters in a Beijing college. THAT is what stopped you from hightailing it to Beijing. Some loyal American you are, whatever you want to pretend I am.

    In fact, I’m guessing what’s really ticking you off about Ukraine’s stubborn refusal to surrender is it means China will have an even tougher time grabbing Taiwan, and it’s pretty clear, in light of that admission, where your true loyalties lie.

    Again, stop projecting your own insecurities, self-loathing, and backstabbing treachery onto others PhysicistDave. It’s too obvious.

    “And ‘we’ Americans never agreed to defend Ukraine.”

    I didn’t say “defend”, PhysicistDave. Stop putting words in my mouth. I said “support”. Given that we midwifed the agreement whereby Ukraine relinquished its nukes in exchange for Moscow’s iron-clad guarantees, it is the least we could do at this point, but plenty of other countries — I mean, countries where most people actually want to live if they could up and flee the way you long to do — have chosen to do the same even though they played no part in that agreement. Good for them.

    • Troll: R.G. Camara
    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  221. Voltarde says:

    Here’s the background information about the MQ-9 Reaper drone activity–clearly acts of war–that have been carried out by the U.S. to enable follow-on kamikaze drone attacks on Crimea.

    Jacob Dreizin (U.S. Army veteran and native Russian speaker) published this back on March 5, 2023.

    https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/05/dreizin-on-belief-and-unbelief/

    As Jacob pointed out:

    Nonetheless…..
    …..these (MQ-9 Reaper drone activity around Crimea) are routine U.S. ACTS OF WAR…..
    …..against Russia.

    [MORE]

    On February 28th…..
    …..as per publicly-available, Russian air traffic control data…..
    …..(I think it was a “NOTAM”)…..
    …..another MQ-9 Reaper drone…..
    …..spent the entire day…..
    …..off the coast of Crimea…..
    …..presumably, surveying potential Russian targets…..
    …..and air defense positions, and their radar frequencies…..

    And, AS USUAL…..

    …..when this happens…..
    …..THE VERY NEXT DAY…..
    …..in this case, March 1st…..
    …..a large number (this time, 15)…..
    …..of Ukrainian kamikaze drones…..
    …..were launched against Crimea.

    I’ve mentioned before…..
    …..that some “Ukrainian” drones are assembled…..
    …..from U.S. Government-supplied components…..
    …..in Czechia.

    (BTW, I had also mentioned this was “classified”… and right after that, permanently lost TWO-THIRDS of my mailing list readership from the “…senate.gov” email domain. LOL, they are afraid. Everyone is afraid.)

    But…..
    …..one or more smaller varieties…..
    …..are assembled within the Ukraine itself…..
    …..also, from components sent from the U.S.

    I can’t say which drones are attacking where, exactly.
    The Ukraine also launches stuff…..
    …..into Russia’s pre-2014 borders.
    But, Crimea bears the brunt of it.

    The U.S. provides the targeting information…..
    …..and intel on the location and radar activity…..
    …..of Russia’s air defenses…..
    ….AND, a steady stream of materials…..
    …..to assemble the drones…..
    …..and all the Ukraine has to do…..
    …..is assemble them…..
    …..and launch them.

    How many drones?
    A couple of months ago…..
    The daily record launched against Crimea…..
    …..was 10.
    Recently, it was 12.

    On March 1st, it was 15.
    Typically, all launched…..
    …..at just about the same time…..
    In “wave” attacks.

    None of these drones has hit anything, for months.

    The only real damage was, one time…..
    …..in the summer…..
    …..when one kamikaze…..
    …..set off a munitions store next to an airbase…..
    …..destroying up to 10 aircraft.
    That was a doozy.
    After that…..
    Russia massively ramped up its Crimean air defenses.
    Since then, “no luck.”

    Nonetheless…..
    …..these are routine U.S. ACTS OF WAR…..
    …..against Russia.

  222. @Voltarde

    which political leader has overseen more improvement in the country that he or she has led over the past 25 years than President Putin has improved Russia?

    Any of them. Putin has been a complete disaster. He is destroying Russia in slow motion. Russian demographic decline has continued unabated since he took office. There has been no meaningful investment in education or healthcare since he took office, just money wasted on ski areas in Sochi, and making Moscow nice and shiny. The economy is overfocused on natural resource extraction, making Russia completely dependent on foreigners, as if Russia were Nigeria. Putin is widely detested in the Russian provinces and by Russian nationalists.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
  223. @Vinnyvette

    Good for your sons, they avoided living in a cultural toxic waste dump.

    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  224. Anon 2 says:

    Jack D said here on a number of occasions he was descended from
    Polish Jews, not Ukrainian Jews

    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  225. TyRade says:

    And of course, back in the Korea War days we still had John Wayne, Errol Flynn, William Holden and Jeff Chandler to win the day/peace/truce. Not least Mr Chandler, whose alleged but prescient cross-dressing habit must have frightened the gooks to submission.

  226. @HA

    My crazy little buddy HAsbara wrote to me:

    [Dave]And ‘we’ Americans never agreed to defend Ukraine.”

    [HAsbara] I didn’t say “defend”, PhysicistDave. Stop putting words in my mouth. I said “support”.

    Defend, support, “we” never agreed to any of that.

    The Budapest Memos do not even say that “we” did.

    In any case, little buddy, you are still having trouble grasping — no doubt because you are an enemy alien — that the guys who agreed to the Pesty Memos had no power whatsoever to bind my country.

    The Clinton crime family may have agreed to what you say they agreed to (though, in fact, they didn’t), but, even had they done so, it is not binding on the US unless it is ratified by the US Senate.

    And it never was.

    It’s just a silly, empty, meaningless piece of paper. Like a used gum wrapper.

    Wee little HAsbara also wrote:

    Given that we midwifed the agreement whereby Ukraine relinquished its nukes in exchange for Moscow’s iron-clad guarantees, it is the least we could do…

    You and your buddies can help them as you wish. You are not “we.”

    You are an enemy of the United States.

    Keep that in mind.

    The least that America could have done is not orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014, not financed, armed, and encouraged the illegal puppet regime in its mass murder of the people of the Donbass, and not denied the people of the Donbass the right of self-determination of peoples as enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter.

    But I will grant one thing that we owe the dictatorship in Kiev: lots of rope and lots of lampposts.

    The better to hang all the neo-Nazis in Kiev by the neck until dead.

    Oh, and we really ought to extradite the American neocons — Nuland, Obama, Biden, et al. — who created this tragedy to Kiev so that they can meet the same fate that they so richly deserve.

    Ukraine will be liberated from the neo-Nazi regime that for some reason you love so much.

    The Eastern Allies will triumph, especially now that China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc. are on board.

    But a huge number of Ukrainians will, sadly, end up dead because of evil monsters like you who insist on encouraging the puppet regime in Kiev to fight to the last Ukrainian.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    , @HA
  227. Anon 2 says:

    Re: Corruption in Russia and Ukraine

    I mentioned the stratospheric levels of corruption in Russia, esp. in
    the Russian military. Let me give a typical example. Let’s say the Kremlin
    orders thousands of high-quality tires for their transport vehicles. High
    level procurers in Moscow, instead of buying expensive tires in Europe,
    will buy cheap substitutes in China, and pocket the difference. Do this
    with other military parts, and see how quickly it’s possible to get rich
    on military procurements. The corrupt but rich Russians then use their
    wealth to buy super-yachts and villas in the south of France. They also
    send their wives, girlfriends, and daughters on wildly expensive shopping
    trips to Dubai, particularly because Europe has become sick of the rich
    Russians flaunting their ill-gotten gains in front of everyone. The New York
    Times had a story 2-3 days ago about how the Russians are taking
    over Dubai.

    That’s one reason why nothing in Russia seems to work, particularly
    in the provinces. Everything looks dilapidated. Everything needs
    a fresh coat of paint.

    I’m sure similar types of corruption are a daily occurrence in Ukraine
    as well but the information about it is strangely missing in the mainstream
    media.

  228. @PhysicistDave

    Barton Kaldian and other commenters on this website are best described as NATO Trolls. NATO is the mechanism they are trying to use to drag other countries, not just America, into conflicts where these countries have no vital interests, such as the Ukraine. There would be no problem now if NATO had been dissolved in the 1990s and a treaty concluded formally ending the Cold War with Russia.

    Even if there had been a conflict between Russia and Ukraine, sure, assorted Poles and other East European Russophobes might be hyperventilating, but the rest of us would be getting on with our lives without contemplating a wider war, or, God forbid, a nuclear war.

    The other side of the coin is the EU, which is equally culpable with the Americans and NATO in this regard. The Maidan Coup was a direct result of Yanukovych rebuffing the EU in favour of Russia.

    Throughout 2012 and most of 2013, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych had been in negotiations with the European Union on the terms of a political/trade agreement involving a sizeable loan, lowering of tariffs, and a goal to “promote gradual convergence on foreign and security matters with the aim of Ukraine’s ever-deeper involvement in the European security area” (direct quote from the agreement). Putin has stated, numerous times over several decades, his concerns about Western military forces creeping closer to Russia’s border. The Ukranians asked for $160 billion to offset trade restrictions that Russia would likely implement as a result of the deal. The EU could only offer $828 million. Russia then offered Ukraine a $15 billion loan and to cut Russian natural gas prices by almost a third. Yanukovych canceled negotiations with the EU and accepted Putin’s offer. Considering the Russian loan was nearly 20 times greater than the EU loan and the agreement eliminated the possibility of Russian sanctions while leaving EU relations largely unchanged, this was a rational decision by Yanukovych. To quote Reuters, “the unwillingness of the EU and International Monetary Fund to be flexible in their demands of Ukraine also had an effect, making them less attractive partners.”

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-us-is-culpable-in-todays-ukraine-crisis/

    • Replies: @Jack D
  229. @The Wild Geese Howard

    Berklee being a music school, hadn’t, at the time at least, found a way to slip woman’s / negro studies into the curriculum.
    However his graduation turned into a negro worship fest. They paid homage to Prince, who had recently died. Which is perfectly reasonable, he was a talented musician. Then they had two more black speakers babbling on about black this and that, that had nothing to do with music. He lost his shit and walked out before it was over, with me not far behind! A chip off the old block!

    • Replies: @HA
  230. @CalCooledge

    Good for your sons, they avoided living in a cultural toxic waste dump.

    Thanks! I’m out of buttons.

  231. @Anon 2

    Jack D said here on a number of occasions he was descended from
    Polish Jews, not Ukrainian Jews

    There’s a Polish joke in here somewhere, but for the sake of civility, I’m going to leave it alone. Jumpin Jack D is already taking quite a beating here today!

  232. @PhysicistDave

    Stop this neo-Nazi nonsense, PD. Ukraine is very much a Zionist project. 3 of the top 5 oligarchs are Jewish. The Azov Regiment ( actually only 1,000 men or so ) is widely regarded as the private army of the most powerful Jewish oligarch, Kholomoisky. Haaretz regarded him as the most powerful Jew in the world. Kholomoisky bankrolled another Zionist Jew, Zelensky, to become President. At one point both the Ukrainian President and PM were Jews – the only other state apart from Israel . Zelensky has made it plain that he wants Ukraine to become a “big Israel”. No guesses needed as to who will play the part of the Palestinians.
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/5/zelenskyy-says-wants-ukraine-to-become-a-big-israel

    Yet there are, at most, 200,000 Ukrainian Jews ( <0.5 % of Ukraine's population ), maybe only 50,000. Their prominence is completely out of all proportion to their numbers. Little wonder that American Zionist Necons and Neolibs ( Nuland, Sullivan, uncle Tony Blinken and all ) are so devoted to the cause of the Zionist Republic of Ukraine. It is very good for the Jews.

    So where does all the neo-Nazi palaver come from. Logically, any “neo-Nazi” would not want to serve in any Zionist Jew’s army, private or otherwise. You must understand the mentality of the Galicians of Western and Central Ukraine. These people have been extremely hostile to Russia and the Russian Government for centuries, made worse by the Holodomor, in which Jewish NKVD operatives were heavily involved. They supported the Germans in both World Wars as a result.

    The famous photo of the Azov Regiment has a tank as a backdrop with Swastika, EU and NATO flags, all in a row. To our eyes that may appear incongruous, but to Galicians it is perfectly logical: these are the flags of some of the entities that have supported the Ukrainian cause, as they see it, over the years. Give them money, weapons and supplies and they will go off and fight Russians.

    This makes them extremely manipulable. They have become mere tools of NATO, EU, America, the Zionists et al. Their extreme hostility towards Russia seems to exclude any notions of pragmatism. This will not end well. Polish mobilisation is scheduled to be complete by May. The aim may well be to occupy western Ukraine, which the Russians seem to be winking at even now. Ukrainians have a reputation for obstinate stupidity. Losing their state will confirm this.

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
  233. Lads, I think we should all calm down here. Very few of us* are paid agents either of Russia (where’s my gold and vodka?), Israel (perhaps some enthusiastic unpaid volunteers) or Langley – we’ve mostly been around since before all this kicked off.

    It’s just that the MSM are in such lockstep (and that may well be – almost certainly is – affected by intelligence agencies – the UK Guardian’s pro-globalist u-turn since MI5 went through all their computers post-Snowden, the feeding of ‘inside information’ to selected journos) that anyone reliant on them for information is going to get nothing but Gallant Little Ukraine and the 21st century equivalent of Cossacks spitting babies on bayonets.

    * I could make an exception for one gung-ho chap who’s too much of an “America? F*** yeah!” good old boy to be true, but why attribute malice when there’s another equally likely possibility?

    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  234. @Anonymous

    Anonymous[355] wrote to me:

    Don’t get your knickers in a twist, Dave.

    He’s a Croat living in Croatia commenting on an internet blog. Hardly a devious enemy alien. Just a bored dummy.

    The only country he’s ruining is his own.

    Unfortunately, no. Bardon is one of a mob of people who, in the aggregate, are seriously risking World War III.

    Yeah, by himself he is just one crazy little trailer-park-trash Serb (AKA a Croat).

    And, yeah, id most Americans would just dismiss guys like him from shithole countries, they really would not matter.

    But it is like if you are getting stung by the entire beehive: one bee alone may not kill you. But if they all sting you… well, you are in a lot of trouble. You can’t just ignore the bees because each individual bee, in and of itself, is insignificant.

    And so we also cannot just ignore the Bardon thugs, as worthless as they are as individuals, because collectively they may actually destroy the world.

    If we let all the Bardons of the world run wild, and if we do not speak up against our fellow citizens who fall for their pathetic bullshit, we and everyone we care about are very likely to end up dead.

    The Internet, unfortunately, now dominates the real world (look at the run on SVB bank).

  235. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    Questions of morality do not weigh in the balance at all, only the likelihood of success vs failure.

    To feel compelled to fight is not necessarily to think that one will win.

    He views everything and everyone else as objects to be manipulated in order to further the interests of #1

    He cares about his children.

  236. @Anon 2

    About 5 to 7 years ago, I wrote a column about Poland and I calculated that Poland had a lot fewer names on the Forbes billionaires list proportional to the size of its economy than either Russia or Ukraine did. I chalked that up as a positive for Poland.

    The nicest piece of property in the Hollywood Hills I’ve ever visited belonged to a Ukrainian “defense consultant” who owned almost the perfect piece of Hollywood Hills real estate: his family lived isolated in their own canyon of about 6 acres full of California Live Oaks on the greener north side of the hills, yet only about 1/4th of mile above Ventura Blvd and 1/2 of mile from the 101 Freeway near Universal Studios. (The downside of living in the Hollywood Hills is usually that it takes a long time, especially at rush hour, to drive to shopping districts in the flat lands, but he was really close to the city while living in this superb forest.) He was a fine family man and there was nothing exorbitantly luxurious about their house, other than it happened to be located on six acres of old growth forest in the Hollywood Hills yet really close to everything.

    His property was similar to, yet probably better than, that of neighbors like George Clooney. I’ve got to imagine there’s a fascinating story behind how a Ukrainian engineer wound up owning such an estate, but I don’t know what it is.

    • Thanks: Anon 2
    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
    , @PhysicistDave
  237. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Your ego and hubris is why normies have contempt for you. The future is Generation Z. Thankfully you are the outlier.

  238. @Jack D

    “What kind of country is russia that it has warlord armies? What normal country allows these to exist?”

    What kind of country is the u.s., that it has warlord armies? What normal country allows these to exist?

    This is, unfortunately, increasingly the world we live in, Jack, one of nominal nation-states, which are dominated by warlord armies, which thrive as parasites, sucking the economic, cultural, and political blood out of productive groups within their borders. In the u.s., feminazis, black supremacists, reconquistas, indian supremacists, homosexualists, sexual psychopaths, etc., suck the life out of normal White men, without opposition.

  239. @Steve Sailer

    “Defense consultant.”
    Are we not currently supplying munitions to Ukraine? Possibly a Hunter Biden ish parallel? “Financial glad handing.”

  240. @Anonymous

    That’s what most posts are about, commenting on the issues tangentially.

    And Croatia is not flooded with “immigrants”, it is misinfo. It is true that there are currently ca. 10,000 to 20,000 non- European foreign workers in tourism and construction, but they are not going to stay, and even they are carefully checked- the policy is to let only non-Muslims, hence there are Nepalese and Filipinos.

    The situation is described in this article: https://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/540486/%D0%90%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8-%D1%83-%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B8-%D0%94%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0-%D1%83-%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83-%D1%98%D0%B5-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81-%D1%81%D0%BC%D1%80%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0

    Asylum seekers in Slovenia: Deportation to Croatia is a death sentence for us

    “Most of us traveled through Croatia, and then applied for asylum in Slovenia. Do you know why we didn’t stay in Croatia? In recent years, the media and human rights organizations, the courts, and even the European Commission have clearly shown this. Croatian police systematically abuse refugees , steals, tortures and mistreats them, and after all returns them to Bosnia without allowing them to request asylum”, they stated in the announcement.

    • Thanks: Pixo
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  241. @Bardon Kaldian

    No, thats exactly wrong, the Russians are no more different from each other than Koreans. Even counting the Gaitziens.

    No matter what Poles might want.

  242. @Anon 2

    Corruption can work both ways. And it does work both ways.

    The West is pillaging Russia (and the Ukraine which is part of it). So corruption might mean money stolen from the western neocolonial masters.

  243. @Jack D

    What about the Bosporus? Doesn’t Putin need that too?

    If it weren’t already full of Turks, I’m sure Putin (and most Russians) would be glad to have it, just as reasonably as the US was glad to have the Panama Canal or New Orleans and ocean access for the Mississippi basin, or as Britain was glad to have the Suez canal, or as the US President Monroe declared exclusive dominance over the entire Western Hemisphere.

    Imperial Russia fought several wars with the Turks/Ottomans (who were sometimes backed by Britain to spite Russia … historical pattern here?) in the past, but the modern Russian Republic has mostly been pretty friendly with Turkey (or Türkiye as they want to be called now).

    Doesn’t Putin need a neutral Ukraine as a buffer state between it and NATO?

    He did request it. As the US requested Cuba not be weaponized. The US got its way by violence and threat of violence. Or as Britain demanded a neutral Belgium around the port of Antwerp, and got it by violence.

    Anyhow, by not agreeing to a neutral Ukraine, US/NATO is in effect demanding a weaponization of Ukraine. Is that somehow more moral?

    Does Putin need Russian troops to be stationed everywhere east of the Elbe in order to protect Russia from invasion? Stalin did.

    It gives me no pleasure to say that NATO is making Stalin’s paranoia seem reasoned and prudent.

    But unlike Stalin, unlike the US, and unlike Britain, Putin has made no demand about any territory not inhabited by his co-nationals, and in most cases he hasn’t even bothered with that. There are large Russian populations in the Central Asian -stans, in the Baltics, in the Caucasus, in Belarus, etc. which everyone is pretty relaxed about. The Donbas was the exception because their neighbors were literally killing them for being Russian. So the Donbas Russians expressed, and Putin (and most Russians) concurred that it would be good if the Donbas could be independent from their murdering neighbors. It seems eminently reasonable. Kiev obviously hated them enough to kill them, so why not separate, as a certain commenter here likes to say?* After all, the West forced the same result on Indonesia after the Indonesians got a little too murdery of the East Timorese. So now East Timor is a separate country. Problem solved. For reasons that escape me, this same cheap, easy, and just solution was vehemently prevented in the Donbas. So now there’s a war.

    ———

    *Except in this one particular case, for reasons that escape me.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  244. Anon 2 says:

    The abysmal levels of corruption in both Russia and Ukraine are
    probably the main reason why the Eastern Slavs seem incapable of producing
    wealth. After all, corruption implies that anyone who can will steal, directly
    or indirectly, and will lie about it.

    Thus Russia’s GDP (PPP) per capita is only 31,967 – which means that despite
    vast mineral wealth, relative to Central and Western Europe, Russia still remains
    a poor country, and due to the war Russia is losing years if not decades of
    economic progress that would have happened otherwise. Ukraine was African-level
    poor even before the war ($14,331 per capita in 2021), and currently its GDP per
    capita is most likely less than $10,000. Almost like Ukraine is experiencing
    a second Holodomor 90 years later.

    By contrast, Poland is Europe’s great success story. Its GDP per capita is $44,249.
    It’s rising so fast that the British media are now saying that by 2030 the average
    Polish family will be richer than the average British family.

    Back in 1991 Russia, Ukraine, and Poland started out on about the same GDP
    level per capita but Poland has shown it knows how to create wealth whereas
    Russia and Ukraine don’t.

  245. Brutusale says:
    @Joe Stalin

    Ah, Forbes. They have their fingers on the pulse, right?

    • LOL: BB753, vinteuil
  246. Brutusale says:
    @Jack D

    Extremism in defense of Yiddishness is no vice!

    I have the same attitude toward Russia/Ukraine that’s growing in popularity in this country: can they both lose? You, on the other hand, have become totally deranged by this splendid little war.

    • Thanks: Captain Tripps
  247. @AndrewR

    I also don’t understand why we can’t just call them Czesko but you seem oddly upset about the name Czechia.

    It’s ugly. Names are important, and I’m an onomast. They already have three beautiful names, Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia, and they use– no, they want us to use– this abortion, carrying over the clumsy Polish digraph.

    In addition, they are telling us how to speak our language.the only excuse for that is if our word for them is insulting. It isn’t. Even then, the Slavic term for Germans is insulting, and the Germans can live with that.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  248. Jack D says:
    @Almost Missouri

    their neighbors were literally killing them for being Russian

    Can you tell me more about the Donbas Pogroms?

  249. Jack D says:
    @Verymuchalive

    And yet the Ukrainian people rose up and rejected the corrupt Yanukovych, who fled from his magnificent marble palace (amazing what you can build on a civil service salary!) directly to his Russian sponsors. Freedom and dignity are worth more than money and cheap Russian gas. Anyway, the Ukrainians knew that the Russian money was not for them but for Yanukovych and his inner circle – they would never see a ruble of it.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  250. In free, independent and democratic Ukraine, Orthodox monks are ordered to leave their monastery. The faithful aren’t happy(and doubtless aren’t happy about a few other things).

    https://www.rt.com/russia/573016-pope-francis-ukraine-lavra-crackdown/

    Pope Francis has voiced concern over the situation in the Kiev Pechersk Lavra following attempts by the Ukrainian authorities to expel monks from the country’s iconic Orthodox Christian site.

    Speaking at the end of a general audience on Wednesday, the pontiff said he was “thinking about the Orthodox monks in the Kiev Lavra.”

    “I ask warring parties to respect religious places,” he added, asserting that the clergy of any denomination “are the support of the people of God.”

    On March 10, Ukraine’s Ministry of Culture claimed, without providing any evidence, that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate had violated a 2013 agreement, under which the state allowed them to administer the religious site. Clerics were subsequently ordered to vacate the monastery by March 29.

    While the clergy have refused to comply, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky endorsed the decision, framing the crackdown as “a move to strengthen our spiritual independence.” This, however, prompted outrage from Moscow, with Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova claiming that “the freedom of religion is being held hostage by the bandits” from the Ukrainian government.

    For years, Ukraine has experienced religious tensions, predominantly between Kiev-backed non-canonical Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), which proclaimed independence from Moscow after Russia launched its military operation in the neighboring country in February 2022.

    This, however, did not spare it from accusations that it covertly supports Russia, and raids have been carried out on numerous Orthodox monasteries across Ukraine, including the Lavra itself.

    • Thanks: Voltarde
  251. @Jack D

    ‘…Once you understand that they WANT America (as it currently exists) to be destroyed and defeated and discredited, it all makes sense why people who you would otherwise normally expect to be patriotic are rooting for America’s enemies.’

    I’m glad to see you’re achieving some level of self-awareness — but why are you describing your people as ‘they’?

  252. @Brutusale

    ‘…I have the same attitude toward Russia/Ukraine that’s growing in popularity in this country: can they both lose? You, on the other hand, have become totally deranged by this splendid little war.’

    I’d like it if JackD would explain why Jews are so prominent among the enthusiastic proponents of this war.

    I have my own theories — but let’s hear his.

  253. @Brutusale

    You, on the other hand, have become totally deranged by this splendid little war.

    Jack has completely be-clowned himself over this war. He went from being a sort of exceedingly verbose but basically harmless Wikipedia cut-and-paste expert on everything under the sun to a guy getting Corvinus level reviews (well except for his pet Johann Ricke clicking “agree” on most of his comments).

    Jack has 22 comments (so far) just on this one string.

    Agree: Jack D

    Troll: Johann Ricke

    • Replies: @Jack D
  254. HA says:
    @PhysicistDave

    “the guys who agreed to the Pesty Memos had no power whatsoever to bind my country.”

    Your country, you say? Because as I have clearly shown to anyone who cares to look at the evidence, Kemosabe, the focal point of YOUR fealties is in no way the US, however much of a heap-big-America-Firster you now want to pretend you are. I mean, give me a break. The paper trail is right there, with link provided.

    Moreover, both the US and China signed on as midwives to the Budapest Memorandum. The Chinese Communist government just chose to weasel and backstab out of it the way Communist Orwellian dictatorships usually do, and no doubt they’re especially angry that this might somehow impede their plans to invade Taiwan. Is that why you’re so agitated, PhysicistDave? Oh, the ignominy of having the country you truly love and the Communists who run it suffer setbacks because of their increasingly unhinged little comrade to the north. I mean, they already have a handful with their crazy cousin North Korea, and now Moscow has decided to go off the deep end too. What’s a power-hungry totalitarian Beijing dictatorship supposed to do?

    Whatever. You go and work out your deep frustrations and tangled loyalties on your own time, PhysicistDave. But do spare me any further pretensions to the effect that in your heart and mind America is still the object of your loyalty.

    Where’s that Matt Damon speech that gets a link every time there’s a post on immigrants here? The one where he pronounces on how the “rest of you are just visting” or passing through? I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the passing-through contingent includes backstabbers like you, frustrated and angry as you are that your longing to move to Beijing has been thwarted by stumbling blocks as picayune as a language barrier and college enrollment issues. That didn’t stop your wife’s parents, did it? But you just can’t hack it. And so you sit here and rage.

    So yeah, it’s. no wonder you’re so peeved. Yes, of course you want to pretend the Budapest Memorandum doesn’t matter and that time when Ukraine agreed to peacefully turn over its nukes is just a historical footnote. So pesky. But good luck making that work outside your echo chamber. And next time, don’t let the mask slip and you might. have a better chance of hiding where your true loyalties lie.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • LOL: Pixo
    • Replies: @PhysicistDave
  255. Muggles says:
    @PhysicistDave

    So, you cherry picked my post to make your reply all about you.

    You failed to address any of the substance of my post. Okay.

    You are married to a Chinese immigrant’s child yet say that the Chinese hold America in contempt. So why are they here? If China is superior, why are you here, and the wife?

    I did not say, nor do I believe, that you are one of those on Unz who believe that “Jews control everything here”. That was an example of simplistic thinking I gave. To address your apparent belief that the “American Hegemon” is the only meaningful State actor on the globe.

    When you believe in a “unicause” whether it is Jews or the American State, you vastly oversimplify reality. This makes arguments and rhetoric easier but as I argue, the world isn’t so simple.

    The rest of your reply about the Jews is beside the points I made.

    I don’t support many of the policies of the Israeli government but that is beside the point regarding Russia and Ukraine and the American involvement. Almost no other nation supports the feeble Russian excuse for the invasion. But to claim it is “all America’s fault” is to attribute everything to one cause, one factor. The “encirclement by NATO” argument by Putin is grasping at straws.

    I find it odd that people who argue as you do repeatedly ignore uncontested facts. If America is so despised and disrespected, why do Chinese, Russians and nearly everyone else flock here as legal or illegal immigrants to remain and become Americans?

    No one is flooding into China or Russia are they? This is revealed preference at work.

    Are any of your Chinese relatives here trying to return home? Is anyone rushing to immigrate to the few nations which support Russia in this conflict? Are they building walls at their borders to keep immigrants out?

    The American State has many flaws and does many things wrong. But to ignore the existence of the dozens of other questionable nation states and their behavior, and paint America as the devil and the rest as innocent, helpless victims, borders on lunacy.

    • Replies: @Ennui
    , @PhysicistDave
  256. HA says:
    @Vinnyvette

    “NATO is the mechanism they are trying to use to drag other countries, not just America, into conflicts where these countries have no vital interests”

    As has been noted on these comments many times, if Putin really wants to go back to pretending this is about NATO (is it really that day of the week again?), as opposed to the one about how Ukraine doesn’t exist, or the narco-maniac Nazi Jew in Kyiv, or Putin’s I-do-what-I-want! compulsion to be the next Peter the Great, let’s remind ourselves that until he started dismembering Ukraine, thereby shredding the Budapest Memorandum that his government had previously signed and managed to honor for decades, public opinion in Ukraine was decidedly against NATO accession. And as the case of Finland and Sweden shows, without that public approval NATO is happy to wait.

    To the extent Putin wants to cry about a problem that his own bungling created in the first place, and thinks the Ukrainians should be punished for having the audacity to turn their hopes to NATO once he showed his true colors, it’s more or less like that one about the defendant in courtroom crying to the judge to have mercy on a poor orphan, and then someone having the gall to point out that the reason he’s on trial in the first place is that the people he murdered were his parents.

  257. @PhysicistDave

    He is a Serbo-Croation

    Learn new trivia every day.
    Thought he was a Brooklyn bagel baker.
    An original Yid from somewhere dark.

  258. Jack D says:
    @William Badwhite

    I made a lot of comments but you counted them, so who is obsessed?

    How many comments did the insane Putinists make as a group? How many people told us that Russia has been winning and will win and deserves to win? How many people said that they don’t care who wins and then made it clear that they are lying and that they actually want Russia to win in order to put the “homosexualists” in their place? How many presented highly selective, sometimes completely false, versions of Ukrainian history lifted from Russian propaganda? How many viewed the war as a project of the Zionists? Etc.

    There are a lot of points where I agree with the general consensus of the Unz crowd on issues concerning Wokeness, BLM, etc. The obsession about trannies is overblown but it is likewise overblown on the Left – they were the ones who turned a tiny group into a culture war issue in the first place. I even understood the anti-vax sentiment which is a result of people’s distrust of authority in general. Our authorities have lied too us too often and are no longer entitled to the benefit of the doubt. On immigration, while I don’t agree with the “zero immigration” sentiment, what we have now (which is essentially open borders) is not viable and we need to get serious about having a controlled system of immigration.

    However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is almost universally condemned (and not just by the Globohomo West). In the UN, a resolution which “deplores in the strongest terms” the aggression by Russia and affirms the international community’s commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine was approved by 141 countries. Only 5 UN member states voted against it: Russia, Belarus, DPRK (North Korea), Eritrea and Syria. (A number of other countries including China abstained but the fact that they did not vote with Russia is very telling.) This frankly puts you in shitty company. Y’all are the ones who have lost your collective minds over this and are openly siding with America’s enemies, not me.

  259. Sean says:

    Today what is happening is a war of Ukraine against Russia. Zelensky cares far more about where the border ends up than Eisenhower did in 1953, and Putin cares far more about where the border ends up than Mao did in 1953

    China was in bad shape so soon after the Civil War but it still chose to back North Korea, and when US armies were closing in on the Chinese border, the Chairman threw his best lightly armed troops into diect combat against Americans although the US had nuclear weapons, which China did not. When the Chinese were forced back from their gains by overwhelming US firepower, they dug in, clung on in the face of massive bombardments and seemed unwilling to quit. Eisenhower had to threaten use of nuclear weapons to get China to agree to a cease fire. I think America was repeatedly astounded by how much Mao cared.

    Russia’s feverish building of fortifications in what they occupy of Ukraine has intensified even further in the last few weeks. I think the Russians have it in mind to apply slow but inexorable pressure at select points while hunkering down to fight a defensive artillery heavy battle, which is something they are far better trained and equipped for doing than combined arms maneuver offensives, which given omniscient US surveillance must merely run into the Ukrainians all set up and waiting. Tanks are being used individually as embedded support for infantry. I do not think the war will fizzle out; continuation of the snail’s pace progress by Russia in Donbass is most likely.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    , @Sean
  260. Ennui says:
    @Muggles

    Muggles,
    Going to a country to make money doesn’t mean you have to respect the inhabitants or desire to assimilate. It’s quite possible to immigrate to America and view the inhabitants with contempt. It would not be hard to find examples of immigrants who dislike Americans but are happy to stay here and participate in the carnival. One easy tell is if an immigrant belongs to any sort of ethnic association (those should be outlawed). But it isn’t limited to that. I’ve overheard numerous immigrants complain about how lazy Americans are. I’m not naive, I’d probably do the same, and we do have lots of lumpenproles, but the sense of entitlement is always shocking.

    Indeed, if recent history is proof, many immigrants want to come here, benefit from the advantages America offers, AND use the military or assets of “their fellow Americans” to advance their tribal grievances back home.

    People point to AIPAC, but that is just the most powerful, and egregious example. Most of the diaspora groups would do the same if they had the same clout.

    The one upside to all this is as we become more diverse it is more difficult for our leaders to rally the people for some foreign idiocy. Lots of people talk about a draft or American kids fighting. That ain’t happening (I hope). More likely is what will happen is sunk costs and inflation.

    • Agree: William Badwhite
    • Replies: @HA
    , @Corvinus
  261. @Jack D

    I made a lot of comments but you counted them, so who is obsessed?

    It took me about 20 seconds to count your posts. How long did it take you to bang out your word salad? I’m going with you as the obsessed one.

    How many comments did the insane Putinists make as a group?

    Don’t know, don’t care. My comment was about you making an ass out of yourself. Stay on topic.

    How many people said that they don’t care who wins and then made it clear that they are lying and that they actually want Russia to win in order to put the “homosexualists” in their place?

    I’m going with zero, until you can back your deranged accusations with a citation.

    However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is almost universally condemned…blah blah blah repeat yourself blah blah recite things everyone already knows….A number of other countries including China abstained but…blah blah blah repeat yourself.

    I edited it for you, too many words. Try for conciseness Jack, it’ll make you a better writer.

    Y’all are the ones who have lost your collective minds over this and are openly siding with America’s enemies, not me.

    No sorry immigrant, I’m an American. I am siding with America, not with whatever your late-arriving immigrant mind has identified as “America’s enemies” this year. The America nation doesn’t have “enemies”, the American nation has interests. Ukraine is not one of those interests. Russia is not one of those interests. That you are too calcified, lazy, or just dishonest to accept that says an awful lot about you, none of it good.

    I’m Mad Bruh: Johann Ricke

    • Agree: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Jack D
  262. @ATBOTL

    Yes. I remember the long-running “Scotch-Irish” joke.

    I could have sworn I saw a comment several years ago by Whiskey mentioning that he was on dialysis. I don’t wish poor health on anybody.

    • Replies: @Hunsdon
  263. @Sean

    When the Chinese were forced back from their gains by overwhelming US firepower, they dug in, clung on in the face of massive bombardments and seemed unwilling to quit. Eisenhower had to threaten use of nuclear weapons to get China to agree to a cease fire. I think America was repeatedly astounded by how much Mao cared.

    Pork Chop Hill is the grim story of one of the major battles of the Korean War. While negotiators are at work in Panmunjom trying to bring the conflict to a negotiated end, Lt. Joe Clemons is ordered to launch an attack and retake Pork Cop Hill. It’s tough on the soldiers who know that the negotiations are under way and no one wants to die when they think it will all soon be over. The hill is of no particular strategic military value but all part of showing resolve during the negotiations. Under the impression that the battle has been won, battalion eadquarters orders some of the men withdrawn when in fact they are in dire need of reinforcements and supplies. As the Chinese prepare to counterattack and broadcast propaganda over loudspeakers, the men prepare for what may be their last battle.

    https://tubitv.com/movies/310146/pork-chop-hill?https://tubitv.com/home?utm_source=_dsa_null_broad_legacy_null_films&utm_medium=adwords_cpc&utm_campaign=null-null-us_nb_variable_search_desktop_google_null_biddable_en_titles

  264. Jack D says:
    @William Badwhite

    Russia, has nothing against America or would have nothing if we just left them alone to live according to their system (which is by the way morally superior to ours). Europe is after all in their back yard and not ours. Russia has been invaded many times and needs to protect itself against future invasion by fascists. America has no enemies. If we just mind our own business, no one would bother us from across the distant oceans.

    These used to be the exact talking points of the American Communist Party. How did they get to be the talking points of the American Right? I feel like I am living in the Mirror Universe. Where is Bad Spock?

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
    , @Sean
  265. @Mike Tre

    Mike, that’s hilarious, but for one omission:

    Wow, after a three week absence (last comment feb 23rd), look who shows up the last couple days to push the kovid and THE You-KKKrane narratives!

    You are obviously not the only knucklehead here who keeps writing THE ukraine incorrectly.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  266. @Jack D

    Russia… according to their system (which is by the way morally superior to ours)

    Said Jack, not me.

    Russia has been invaded many times and needs to protect itself against future invasion by fascists.

    Said Jack, not me. Remember the part where I’ve told you numerous times I don’t care about Russia or what happens to it? I get that transmit-only is your default setting but its really tiresome. Though I admit I’m coming to hope Russia wins, just because it would make your head explode.

    America has no enemies.

    America has no permanent enemies (examples: France, the UK, Germany, Japan). Only permanent interests. As of today, Russia is neither friend nor enemy (to the American nation that is, it may be to wherever you are loyal).

    If we just mind our own business, no one would bother us from across the distant oceans.

    Said Jack, nobody else.

    These used to be the exact talking points of the American Communist Party.

    I wouldn’t know, not having ever been a communist. That’s you people’s thing so I’ll take you at your word. Are you sure though these were “the exact talking points”? That wouldn’t be a little hyperbole/lie would it?

    Also you’re betraying your decrepitude age – I’m older than most commenters here, and the American Communist Party was already a footnote by the time I came of age. That its still in your frontal lobe is…telling.

    I feel like I am living in the Mirror Universe.

    Ahh, now your posts are more understandable. You spend your time arguing with people that exist in your head.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  267. @Peter Akuleyev

    Just put Biden in what you say about Putin and you have the future United States.

  268. Jack D says:
    @William Badwhite

    That’s the problem – you have no historic memory. You are like those brain-damaged guys who meet their nurses anew every morning because they can’t remember what happened yesterday. There is tremendous continuity in Russian Imperialist behavior from Czars to Communists to Putin (and in the excuses that Russia’s enablers in the West make to excuse Russian bad behavior) but to you and the Putinists this seems like a brand new situation that started in 2014 when the Ukrainians suddenly pogrommed the Russians of the Donbas and brave Putin rescued them. If your historical perspective doesn’t even go back to 1983*, then you are bound to get the wrong answers:

    *In 1983, the US began to deploy nuclear tipped cruise missiles in Europe. Since the Russians had nothing to match, they organized an “anti-nuclear movement” in Europe and the US. Strangely, there was no anti-nuclear movement in Russia demonstrating against the Soviet govt having nuclear weapons.) Just like the people here today, most of the marchers didn’t even realize that they were Russian shills.

    https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/10/22/An-estimated-300000-anti-nuclear-demonstrators-jammed-London-Saturday-march/8828435643200/

    The Guardian newspaper said Saturday the first cruise missiles would arrive in Britain within 10 days, by Nov. 1. The Ministry of Defense refused comment.

    The prediction agitated hundreds of marchers, who came from every strand of British life. Communist organizations were out in force, but there were mothers with babes in arms and an elderly lady with a dog whose red jacket proclaimed ‘Dogs against the bomb.’

    This was the UK but the same thing went on in the US. Maybe by 1983 the American Communist Party per se was a spent force – they were reborn in disguise as the left wing of the Democratic Party. Bernie Sanders (honeymooned in the USSR) embodies it to this day.

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
    , @Ennui
    , @HA
  269. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    That’s all very interesting about how Americans differ over the correct explanations for Russian behavior, but the attitude of Russians is what matters and they have had a bellyful

    • Replies: @Jack D
  270. @Jack D

    Votes in the UN are meaningless and since the majority of the nations in the UN are tiny countries with tiny economies, they are easily bought and influenced. Voting against “Russian Aggression” is a very general and a mum and apple pie action and looks good on paper when you come up to apply for more aid from western countries. Many of these same countries are lining up with the new Russia/Chinese led economic order because they see that the US led economic order is on it’s way out.

  271. @Jack D

    I made a lot of comments but you counted them, so who is obsessed?

    Maybe he works on your unauthorized bio ?

  272. Most-not all-commenters here are emotionally immature, bad mannered, behaving like a dumped hysterical girlfriend. Nosey Parkers in search of Freud.

    Sad!

    • Replies: @Ennui
  273. Zelensky does care immensely about where the line ends up, but he also knows that if we stop backing him, that line is going to be the border with Poland. We can get to a compromise by letting him know we are turning off the spigot.

    The risk to that, of course, is that if we get in too deep, then our government looks weak / stupid etc. if that happens. This is a big reason Zelensky wants us to keep upping the commitment beyond the obvious of the weapons themselves helping a lot on the battlefield).

  274. Jack D says:
    @Sean

    Here is an equally impressive map:

    Roughly speaking the Ukrainian front stretches around 1,000 miles and there are 300,000 Russian troops in Ukraine so around 300 soldiers to defend every mile. Do you really think the Ukrainians can’t punch thru this if they concentrate their forces at certain points? Did the Russians not build fortifications near Kharkiv and Kherson and were they not pushed back?

  275. @Cagey Beast

    I haven’t been able to eat a perogie since.

    If it’s any consolation, those are associated with Czechs and Slovaks as well, and I think Poles do them too, under a different name.

    I asked a new coffee shop nearby, one with Slovak roots, when they were going to offer pierogi(e)s. Not anytime soon– those are labor-intensive, what with pastry flour and such.

  276. Jack D says:
    @Sean

    The Russians can have whatever attitude they want inside their own borders. The Russians murdered 50,000 of their own citizens in Chechnya and no one in the West batted an eyelash. Putin systematically dismantled all aspects of a free society in Russia and murdered his political opponents and no on in the West cared. But when they invaded the territory of a sovereign country in Europe and tried to overthrow the democratically elected government by sending tanks to the capital, that got the West’s attention.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Art Deco
  277. Pixo says:
    @R.G. Camara

    Being a “fed” agent I’d consider a high complement.

    I am not now, but would be pleased to be one under President DeSantis.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  278. @Reg Cæsar

    The only excuse for that is if our word for them is insulting.

    Well, one other excuse– postal confusion. We are asked to write “Ivory Coast” in French and “Timor Leste” in Portuguese because the literal translations of these names differ wildly in the world’s languages. What is the postal worker halfway between Hanover and Yamoussoukro supposed to do with Elfenbeinküste?

    Same probably goes for “White Russia”, which still goes by that in many neighboring countries’ tongues. Still, it sounds better than Belarus, which looks like a cheap Shenzhen-knockoff snowmobile brand.

  279. @Jack D

    Oh look more word spam from Jack. Normally I have you set to “ignore” but after scrolling past a few dozen Jack D grayed out “show comments” and I had to weigh in.

    Let me head you off at the “but you’re posting too” pass:

    Billy Badwhite comments YTD: 106
    Jack J comments YTD: 942

    That’s the problem – you have no historic memory.

    I don’t need historic “memory” because I can read. I’ll fast forward from Peter the Great, past the Great Game, past WW1 and WW2 and the Cold War to today. I know that the USSR no longer exists and that Russia (the “gas station with nukes” as you once wrote, copying it from someone else of course) is no longer a threat to the United States.

    I know that you’re really old but even you don’t remember Tsars or even remember when your people established Bolshevism. You are emotional on this topic, which leads to your inability to think clearly. But by all means, bang out another few dozen repetitive comments.

    There is tremendous continuity in Russian Imperialist behavior….blah blah Putinists blah blah pogrommed blah blah repeat things everyone knows blah blah Russians blah blah blah Putin blah blah

    I get why this is important to YOU – you are emotionally tied to the “Old Country”. I believe you when you say that Russia has had “tremendous continuity”, in their behavior towards YOUR people. I knew this already, I just don’t care.

    That’s the problem – you have no historic memory. You don’t know it means to leave the Old World (and your ethnic grudges) behind and become an American. You becoming a Wretched Refuse-American doesn’t mean we have to fight your battles for you.

    the Putinists

    Oh look, a Jew is name-calling. Again.

    *In 1983, wiki cut-and paste blah blah more cut-and-paste blah blah.

    In 1983 things were getting pretty tense with the Soviets, were you serving in the U.S. military? Ha ha j/k we know the answer: Fighting is for people that can’t spew words by the millions.

    AFAIK, Ukraine is accepting volunteers. I know that you’re elderly now, but you’ve mentioned a son. Why don’t you encourage him to go fight? Why is it always “we” with you people, by which you mean “someone else besides us”? Show us you can fight too. Send us some pics of Jack Jr ready for action. Less talk more action.

  280. Jack D says:
    @Cagey Beast

    I haven’t been able to eat a perogie since.

    First of all, it’s pierogi. 2nd, that’s a Polish word. Ukrainians call them vareniki.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  281. @Paleo Liberal

    Military history precedents could have been helpful. In 7 CE Silla defeated Tang China, but halted its advance at the Taedong River, where modern Pyongyang lies. This formed a stable border for the next two and half centuries between Silla, and Chinese / Manchurian polities hostile to it,


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silla–Tang_War

    In 16 CE Joseon refused Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s request to “borrow temporary entry on way to Ming”. The samurais advanced north rapidly. The Ming was embroiled in internal political crisis and reluctant to intervene. But when the Japanese breached the Taedong defense line, finally did, and repulsed the overextended Japanese.

    UN forces were also overextended by the time of their Race to Yalu. But had they halted at the Taedong, PRC might not have entered.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  282. @PiltdownMan

    Edwin Moise, the writer of that letter, is a historian and a professor of 20th century military history.

    And a long-time colleague of my father’s. And a Democrat.

    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
  283. @Jack D

    For people like you, there is a Cossack round every corner and a pogrom just over the horizon. Have a nice day !

  284. @Pixo

    Being a “fed” agent I’d consider a high complement.

    lol. Imagine thinking being a warmongering, lying member of the Stasi a “high compliment.” Only a Deep State fed would think his evil job his admirable and desirable.

    I am not now, but would be pleased to be one under President DeSantis

    lmao. Shocking that this Deep State fed wants an obvious Deep State plant who is designed to steal Trump’s base and run to the right — only to shift right to a swamp rat the moment he might get “elected.”

    You Deep State feds are such enemies of the people.

  285. @Cagey Beast

    Don’t bother the fed HackD with facts. As a Deep State warmongerer, he can’t be bothered with facts.

  286. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “Going to a country to make money doesn’t mean you have to respect the inhabitants or desire to assimilate.”

    Sure, it doesn’t always mean that. And someone who does value America can still spawn an angry teenage/20-something malcontent lowlife who wants to cut off heads or whatnot. But on the whole, those revealed preferences are a lot more credible than claiming all of Asia and Africa and Latin America are on Putin’s side because of I-forget-exactly-why, and that is what the Putin trolls are doing.

    Unless you want to claim that it’s the vast majority of those immigrants that despises America and Germany and the UK and the rest, and yet, still grabs hold of any chance of emigrating there like it were a gold ticket from the Wonka factory, you still have a whole of explaining to do. Especially given that the queues of those lining up to get into Russia and China are far easier to navigate and yet they remain tiny by comparison.

    By the way, how many of those African/Indian/LatinAmerican countries that supposedly love Putin have recognized any of his landgrabs like, say, the one in Crimea?

    • Replies: @Ennui
  287. @Verymuchalive

    ‘…Little wonder that American Zionist Necons and Neolibs ( Nuland, Sullivan, uncle Tony Blinken and all ) are so devoted to the cause of the Zionist Republic of Ukraine. It is very good for the Jews…’

    If only. I’ve a dark suspicion that we overestimate how rational Jews collectively are.

    I think it just makes them very happy to see Russians and Ukrainian gentiles killing each other. If they could just get Poland to join in, they’d probably swoon with ecstasy.

    Seriously: this is what I see. Jews are really getting off on this war. I find it mildly disconcerting, but there it is. As I’ve said, it’s not that we’re all sheep on Farmer Bob’s ranch; that’d be depressing, but not as bad as it could be.

    The problem is that Farmer Bob is an idiot. He doesn’t water his stock or do anything about the wolves. He’s going to kill us all, in the end. That won’t do him any good — but that’s not much consolation.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  288. Jack D says:
    @Cagey Beast

    Must be a Canadian thing. You guys don’t know how to spell. What colour are your tires? Make up your mind. Is it British spelling or American?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  289. nebulafox says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    You’ve read “The Odd Man Out”? Thornton’s take is that Stalin wanted ultimate Communist victory and was willing to go to considerable lengths to undermine the stability of the KMT regime to ensure it, but he wanted the Chinese Civil War to go at as long, dragged out a pace as possible to ensure maximum CCP dependency. That’s why he tried to prompt mediation at the UN.

    That said, he was nothing if not tactically flexible and quickly accepted it when it became clear that the KMT regime was falling apart.

    >The other was that while the Korean War had started out as a war between two Korean governments, it had to a large extent been taken over by their outside backers. The United States was fighting China. The United States could reach a compromise settlement with China.

    It didn’t. The Soviet Union prompted the war because Kim Il-Sung’s invasion of Korea fit Stalin’s agenda in the region nicely: i.e, keeping Mao firmly in the Soviet camp as a subordinate power. If the invasion of Korea occurred, Mao couldn’t invade Taiwan. And the PLA lacked the air and naval resources to invade Taiwan without Soviet largesse, as events at the conclusion of the civil war showed. Put more bluntly: it’s not an accident that the Korean War ended not long after Stalin died and Truman left office.

    Although it worked at the time, Stalin’s decision in 1950 would backfire horribly on the Russians in the long-term because a) the American military and industrial response it provoked pitted a “fresh” power not impacted by WWII against a nation scarred by the nastiest invasion in human history in a trial not just of ideology, but basic human prosperity, and b) it alienated the Chinese to the point that it ensured they’d attempt to leave the Soviet camp as soon as Stalin died. Even before Sino-American rapproachement, the industrial and arms inertia caused by simultaneous American and Chinese hostility was too great for the Soviet Union to overcome.

    As for the Koreans themselves? Well, this is something I can’t whip out the documents to prove, like so much else about DPRK history, but I don’t think the events of 1956 which crystalized the little nutball totalitarian regime we all know and love are unrelated to Kim Il Sung’s experiences in the Korean War with his allies. Also, the Vietnamese took sharp notice of events in Korea in the early 1950s and became determined to avoid the same fate. For better or for worse, I suppose: the Communists got what they wanted in the end in 1975 , but man, the price…

    (While less well known than Korea, the First Indochinese War with the French in the early 1950s was another destructive “total” war, as opposed to what we think of “Vietnam” in American historiography-the complicated, multifaceted guerilla/civil conflict we associate with that was the second half of the 1950s and 1960s until Tet, after which it switched back to a conventional war. Also, war didn’t end in 1975: Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia, Chinese invasion of Vietnam, etc. Combine that with the neo-Stalinist dictatorship of the 1980s and the shock therapy missteps of the 1990s, and it’s little wonder that Vietnam took so long to finally experience economic hothouse growth as it is now.)

  290. @Jack D

    What would the “Korean analog(ue)” of poutine* be? Kimchi, gamja jorin, corn cheese, and hot pepper sauce?

    *No, not this Poutine:

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Joe Stalin
  291. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    In 7 CE Silla defeated Tang…

    In 16 CE Joseon refused Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s request…

    You are referring to centuries, not years. The ordinal -th is necessary for clarity. E.g., “the 16th c. A.D.”

  292. @Chrisnonymous

    “Jack D, armchair patriot. …”

    This is silly, the pro-Russian people aren’t volunteering either. Dying for your country is one thing, dying for someone else’s country is another thing.

  293. Ennui says:
    @HA

    “Revealed preferences” just means people know an opportunity when they see one. 3rd world people don’t go to Russia because its poor and xenophobic as is China. People aren’t stupid. They know America is “easy” to get to, set up a business, and make money. This isn’t evil, but let’s not fool ourselves, with the exception of a few weirdos, most immigrants are economic, not ideological.

    To your other point, do you think your average Arab, Indian or African (or Israeli) is willing to sacrifice their standard of living for Ukraine’s “freedom”? That’s the kind of sacrifice European and American elites want to impose on their peoples. Modi et al realize if they tried that crap they’d be out, if not lynched, pretty quickly.

    • Replies: @HA
  294. Ennui says:
    @Jack D

    Jack,

    Kishniev was mostly carried out by Moldovan peasants, let it go, or direct your anger at them. If your kin were as anti-Moldovan as you are anti-Russian it would be a lot cheaper for us taxpayers.

    “Historical Memory”, remind me, which Ukrainian leader seized the Crimea from the Turks? If it had not been for the Russian empire, the “Ukrainians” (what’s the etymology of that term again? the edge of what again?) would have still been cowering in the Carpathian foothills waiting for the next raid to carry off their daughters to the harems of Istanbul.

    That or being feckless bandits down in the Zaparozhe.

    One can be well-versed in the history of the area and still not give a shit.

    • Thanks: PhysicistDave
    • Replies: @Jack D
  295. Eagle Eye says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    … both North and South Koreans belong to the same people …

    That’s a simple-minded Western-centric view. In fact, all of Korea consists of a number of regions each with a distinct culture, language (dialect), customs, food etc. developed and maintained over centuries, and reinforced by mutual antipathy among regions. Even Wikipedia admits this basic fact.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Provinces_of_Korea

    There is even speculation that languages related to proto-Japanese rather than Korean were spoken in some regions on the Korean Peninsula in historical times.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peninsular_Japonic

    The fashionable modern tendency to ignore local ethnic differences in far-away countries – happily supported by current governments seeking to paper over historical fissures – is altogether silly.

    In the 19th century, Western societies were genuinely curious to find out what makes other countries/peoples tick, regional variations, etc. both out of pure academic interest and for ulterior reasons including assessing military and economic opportunities, missionary activity, etc. Interested Western explorers and researchers studied local languages, interacted with local populations across local ethnic and class barriers, conducted detailed surveys covering geography, populations, flora and fauna, etc., and meticulously documented and collated their discoveries. (And yes, there was also a good deal of prejudice and error, prurient interest in real or imagined sexual mores, etc.)

    Undeniably, the massive knowledge base created by early Western researchers became the basis for a deeper, modern understanding by non-Western societies themselves, often opening up perspectives and connections not fully understood prior to Western involvement.

    While the impact of Western research methods is huge and undeniable, genuine and deep questions remain as to what insights and perspectives were conversely lost through hurried and often uncritical acceptance of Western notions and practices, and unreflected abandonment of historical knowledge and systems of thought. How would Chinese geography, Indian astronomy, or even agricultural practices in Japan have developed without European influence over the past 300 or 600 years?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  296. Jack D says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Wow, Gamja Jori[m], Corn Cheese – you are quite the Korean food expert.

    Nobody quite seems to know where kon-chijeu came from. It’s obviously of recent origin (the history of cheese in Korea does not extend beyond the 1960s) but exactly how? One possibility is that it is a copy of Elote that originated in LA. Another version is that there was a sushi bar dish involving corn and mayonnaise and the customers kept mistaking the mayo for cheese so someone tried using actual cheese.

    The new world crops of potatoes, corn and chili peppers were introduced much earlier, long before the American GIs arrived with the Spam. New veggies were a much easier sale to E. Asians than the idea of keeping cows for milk.

  297. @Reg Cæsar

    All sorts of commentary on poutine for this YT piece.

    Stacey Fletcher
    1 year ago (edited)
    As a person who came from an area near St. Albert, Ontario where the St. Albert cheese factory is, I absolutely concur that they are the ones to use. When the St. Albert factory burned down some years ago, restaurants and customers from all around Eastern Ontario/Western Quebec were devastated! However, to everyone’s great relief they managed to save their cheese culture, and were able to rebuild and grow larger than ever before. St. Albert curd for the win!

  298. Anonymous[290] • Disclaimer says:
    @Eagle Eye

    Undeniably, the massive knowledge base created by early Western researchers became the basis for a deeper, modern understanding by non-Western societies themselves, often opening up perspectives and connections not fully understood prior to Western involvement.

    Most of what Germans and Slavs know of their prehistory comes from Greek and Roman writers.

    • Replies: @Eagle Eye
  299. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    The Russians murdered 50,000 of their own citizens in Chechnya and no one in the West batted an eyelash

    Yeltsin started that conflict, and Poland promptly started agitating for Ukraine to be admitted to NATO. That got Russia’s attention. The key events predated Putin. And so did the warnings that trying to get Ukraine into NATO would result in war.

    But when they invaded the territory of a sovereign country in Europe and tried to overthrow the democratically elected government by sending tanks to the capital,…

    You betcha!

  300. choxopox says:
    @Jack D

    It’s the US that is becoming a pariah state, not Russia.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  301. Eagle Eye says:
    @Anonymous

    Most of what Germans and Slavs know of their prehistory comes from Greek and Roman writers.

    Good point, illustrates same principle. True diversity and multiplicity of perspectives is an indispensable condition of cultural advancement.

  302. choxopox says:
    @Jack D

    Your views don’t matter. The economic destruction of the US is a done deal. Prepare for it. El Al is taking reservations.

  303. @Verymuchalive

    Verymuchalive wrote to me:

    Stop this neo-Nazi nonsense, PD. Ukraine is very much a Zionist project.

    Ummm… probably not. What would Israel get from this mess?

    Verymuchalive wrote to me:

    So where does all the neo-Nazi palaver come from. Logically, any “neo-Nazi” would not want to serve in any Zionist Jew’s army, private or otherwise.

    Well… that seems not to be true. The Azov guys were very, very openly neo-Nazis.

    I would guess that maybe they did not see anti-Semitism as the most important aspect of Nazism. Or maybe they were Holocaust denialists.

    Or maybe they are just plain really, really stupid. Nazis are, you know.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    , @Valestein
  304. choxopox says:
    @ATBOTL

    Whiskey finally got himself a girl, probably a Squatamalan, but unambiguously a female.

  305. anon[235] • Disclaimer says:

    “analogous” to Koreans?

    • Replies: @Inquiring Mind
  306. @Muggles

    Muggles wrote to me:

    So, you cherry picked my post to make your reply all about you.

    You failed to address any of the substance of my post. Okay.

    It surprises you that I answered the parts of your post that were directed at me?

    Don’t you do that? Do you know anyone who doesn’t?

    And I did not see any “substance” to address. I do not think you are generally a very “substantial” person.

    Muggles also wrote:

    That was an example of simplistic thinking I gave. To address your apparent belief that the “American Hegemon” is the only meaningful State actor on the globe.

    Huh? I keep making clear that I think the Hegemon is a paper tiger and that I think the Eurasian coalition — Russia/China/Iran, etc. — is the most important actor.

    Muggles also wrote:

    But to claim it is “all America’s fault” is to attribute everything to one cause, one factor.

    I’m a scientist. When a simple answer is the truth, it is the truth.

    Muggles also wrote:

    But to ignore the existence of the dozens of other questionable nation states and their behavior, and paint America as the devil and the rest as innocent, helpless victims, borders on lunacy.

    You are an awfully funny person: I have talked a great deal about other states — Russia, China, the illegal puppet regime in Kiev, etc.

    To be sure, the only state over which I have some influence and some legitimate sway is the US, since I am a US citizen speaking to people who are largely US citizens. So, of course, I do focus on what the US should do differently.

    I am afraid that again I see no substance at all in what you have to say, just bizarre complaints on what I do or do not choose to focus on.

    Very, very weird.

    There must be a negotiated peace in Ukraine based on the self-determination of peoples enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter and applied to the peoples of the Donbass.


    So that the killing will stop.

  307. @Colin Wright

    If only. I’ve a dark suspicion that we overestimate how rational Jews collectively are.

    I tend to agree. Not all Jews have this attitude, but nearly all the politically important are rabid Zionists. Indeed, nearly all of these have a pathological hostility to Russia and Russians. Ukraine is a coin to these people. One side says: very good for the Jews, the obverse, use to beat Russia and Russians.

  308. @HA

    The enemy alien HAsbara wrote to me:

    Moreover, both the US and China signed on as midwives to the Budapest Memorandum.

    Again, you prove you are not an American: no agreement is binding on the US unless it is ratified by the Senate.

    And the Pesty Memos weren’t.

    The enemy alien also wrote to me:

    I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the passing-through contingent includes backstabbers like you, frustrated and angry as you are that your longing to move to Beijing has been thwarted by stumbling blocks as picayune as a language barrier and college enrollment issues. That didn’t stop your wife’s parents, did it?

    Boy, you are sure obsessed with the fact that I married into a Chinese immigrant family, aren’t you, little buddy?

    Okay, it is time for me to come clean: the real reason I did that is that East Asian genes are simply superior to the genes of trailer-park-trash Europeans, Untermenschen like Bardon Kaldian, Peter Akuleyev, and, of course, you.

    Now, the Great Russians, they have a real culture — Tolstoy, Rachmaninoff, Mendeleyev, and on and on.

    But the rest of you East Europeans?

    Untermenschen. Trailer-park trash.

    Or, if you prefer the Russian term, which I have always found to be much more expressive, некультурный.

    That is what you are, little buddy: некультурный.

    There must be a negotiated peace in Ukraine based on the self-determination of peoples enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter and applied to the peoples of the Donbass.

    So that the killing will stop.

    • Replies: @HA
  309. @Steve Sailer

    Steve Sailer wrote:

    His property was similar to, yet probably better than, that of neighbors like George Clooney. I’ve got to imagine there’s a fascinating story behind how a Ukrainian engineer wound up owning such an estate, but I don’t know what it is.

    Hint, Steve: he was not an engineer.

    Or maybe that was your subtle point and I just missed it?

  310. @YetAnotherAnon

    YetAnotherAnon asked:

    I could make an exception for one gung-ho chap who’s too much of an “America? F*** yeah!” good old boy to be true, but why attribute malice when there’s another equally likely possibility?

    A number of commenters here — Bardon Kaldian Peter Akuleyev, HA, Jack D, et al. — have made abundantly clear that they have an allegiance to some power other than the American Republic, and, yet, they are quite abusive to those of us who are loyal to the United States of America; they and their pals have succeeded in drawing our country into a territorial dispute that has no importance to most Americans but that could get us all killed in a nuclear conflagration.

    All of us put up with this for a long time, but we have finally had enough. We are treating these little thugs as they treated us.

    Does that answer your question?

    There must be a negotiated peace in Ukraine based on the self-determination of peoples enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter and applied to the peoples of the Donbass.

    So that the killing will stop.

  311. @PhysicistDave

    When the Azov Regiment was incorporated into the Ukraine National Guard in 2017, it had 2,500 men. By the start of last year, it was seemingly down below a thousand, this in a Ukrainian military of 250,000. So it is militarily and politically insignificant. Here’s Karl Haemer’s informative article from earlier this year in UR about them.
    https://www.unz.com/article/how-jewish-is-azov/

    For details of the Zionist Republic of Ukraine, Thomas Dalton and, especially, Dr William Joyce, have produced excellent articles. Here’s Dr Joyce’s most recent one.
    https://www.unz.com/article/jewish-corruption-in-ukraine/

  312. Zelo says:

    The kind of white people who sign up for fighting USA’s wars are not going to do it anymore.

    And without them, you don’t have a fighting force.

  313. Ennui says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So says the wannabe digital hussar. You are just mad we don’t support your pathetic ethnic chauvinism and waste our money fighting Duginist bogeymen (who are your cousins, btw, not ours).

    But take heart, the blowhards, narcissists, and thieves who rule us are committed to splurging our taxes on your wretched squabbles.

  314. Mike Tre says:
    @Nicholas Stix

    Your rabbi Sailer flushed my reply to you, but I take your pejorative as a compliment. Get a job and a haircut Gandalf Softhands.

  315. Valestein says:
    @PhysicistDave

    The Azov types are useful idiots not unlike the Antifa are to big business and the establishment. They both engage in mental gymnastics to think that they’re the ones using their benefactors to their own benefit and not the other way around.

  316. Hunsdon says:
    @Jack D

    Jack, all press secretaries are dancing monkeys. It’s kind of their job.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  317. Jack D says:
    @Hunsdon

    True enough, but I wasn’t the one quoting him. Statements like “all goals are military goals” are not meant to be taken at face value. All dictators love to saber rattle. Why would you quote this? What does it even mean? Did the goals change? Were the Russian troops up until that day in Ukraine to help with the harvest but NOW their goals are military?

    There is some fantasy by Putinists that Russia hasn’t really been trying hard and if they would only change gears and seriously apply themselves to the war they could win. Sorry, no, this is all they’ve got short of nuclear weapons which they are clearly (and with good reason) hesitant to use. They could draft more men but men without training and equipment (that Russia doesn’t have) are cannon fodder and their life expectancy on the battlefield is a matter of minutes.

    • Replies: @Sean
  318. Jack D says:
    @choxopox

    Sure. Can you give examples? UN resolutions, war crime investigations, trade sanctions and so on? Or is this just a playground rejoinder?

    • Replies: @choxopox
  319. Hunsdon says:
    @TWS

    I use a similar line about the state of America all the time, TWS. “We’re in the looting stage.”

  320. Jack D says:
    @Ennui

    You completely misunderstand the relevance of history. History is not relevant so that you can continue carrying on some blood feud or so that you can denigrate some ethnic group for their past as a people without their own country. History is relevant because of what it tells us about the actions of the Russian leadership TODAY. Putin himself has made no secret that the Czars and in particular Peter the Great are his role models.

    The idea that the Jews in general or me in particular are somehow getting even for the pogroms is ridiculous. Forget about Moldovans. As I am sure you know, the Ukrainians themselves were involved in anti-Jewish pogroms and a lot more recently (1940s) and these pogroms directly affected my family. The only reason my mother was spared was that she had been deported to Siberia by the NKVD. I recently found out that only around a dozen Jews from my mother’s shtetl of several hundred survived the war (of which my family in Siberia formed half). So I personally have every reason to like Russians more than Ukrainians and before this war, I can’t say that I particularly liked either, though I perhaps liked Ukrainians even less than Russians.

    But that was then and this was now. History is only useful as a guide to understanding the present. The Moldovans and Ukrainians of today don’t seem particularly anti-Semitic. They elected a Jew as their president. I get the feeling that a lot of unz commenters would never vote for a Jew, so perhaps they are less anti-Semitic than (at least some) present day Americans.

  321. @James B. Shearer

    “Dying for your country is one thing, dying for someone else’s country is another thing.”

    Which country did the US dead in Iraq die for?

    Quite ironic, really – 14 Saudi nationals carry out 9/11 and the US attacks Iraq (who they’d previously supported v Iran).

    I guess if there’s an Iran/Saudi rapprochement the US might suddenly remember 9/11 or “shocking new evidence” might emerge of Saudi involvement.

    Tangentially related, a couple of rare Eamonn Fingleton posts.

    Post A – we in the West are basically buggered, our only hope being perhaps Japan. And this was written BEFORE we forced Russia into China’s arms.

    http://www.fingleton.net/the-rise-of-east-asia-and-an-epochal-threat-to-american-freedoms-2/

    “China runs about twenty years behind Japan, as is obvious in, for instance, the global car industry. This means it has a lot of technologically easy catchup growth ahead of it. Combine this with the fact that China boasts four times America’s population (and eleven times Japan’s) and it is hard to exaggerate how dominant Beijing will be by 2050.

    Invented in the desperately poor circumstances of early-1950s Japan (and thus a memorable instance of necessity playing mother to invention!), the Confucian model has long been powerfully shaping economic outcomes in South Korea and Taiwan as well as, of course, in China and Japan.

    The model’s key function is to force-feed the growth process. Admittedly in the case of Japan, growth lately has been lower than it was in the 1980s. But this reflects factors external to the model: in particular, as economists like Paul Krugman and William Cline have pointed out, Japan’s growth has been greatly curtailed by a uniquely jolting demographic switchback (the echo of a major effort begun in 1948 to reduce the population).

    Of course, those in the West who cling to the belief that the model failed Japan see little reason to worry about a rising China.

    On the other hand, for those who realize that the model greatly alleviated Japan’s uniquely difficult demographic problems, it is clear that the Confucian model presents a devastating challenge to the United States. Japan never lost its mojo in recent decades and the prospect is that China will not either.”

    And more recently, a defence of manufacturing and a swipe at services.

    http://www.fingleton.net/the-myth-of-post-industrialism/

    Of course, some post-industrial businesses have proved spectacularly successful – companies like Google and Amazon come to mind. But even with Silicon Valley’s massive growth of the last half century, post-industrialism has fallen far short of creating enough new American jobs to make up for the loss of manufacturing.

    This is where we get right to the point: jobs are one of three vital economic criteria on which manufacturing’s contribution is a strongly positive one. The other two are wages and exports.

    The jobs point hardly needs elaboration: factory work generally creates plenty of productive jobs for ordinary workers. By contrast, jobs in many of the most successful post-industrial businesses are reserved disproportionately for workers of above-average ability.

    Of course, there are some exceptions. Thus Uber and DoorDash are examples of so-called “gig economy” employers who create plenty of work for workers of average ability. The problem is that such work compares quite unfavorably with the sort of jobs manufacturing used to create in better times. For the most part, gig economy work pays little more than minimum wages and falls down also in terms of job security and benefits.

    Contrast that with how things were in manufacturing in the 1950s through the early 1970s, when well-paid, secure, pensionable jobs were becoming the norm even for assembly-line workers.

    I drove a hired Chinese van a few months back, moving a child to a new workplace and house. It was pretty good. Ford needs to watch out. White Van Man in the UK is a big market, and I’m sure the US one is ten times the size.

  322. Hunsdon says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Didn’t Whiskey previously go by EvilNeocon or EvilNeocon99? Plus, who can forget his rapturous odes to the moldboard plow!

  323. @Anonymous

    People, this is the architecture of the peace settlement.

    1. Ukraine will never become part of NATO, but they are going to be armed to the teeth by NATO. Sorry, Vlad, but you should have thought about that before crossing the berm with your tanks.

    2. Russia and Ukraine shall withdraw all their troops from The Four Provinces, to be replaced by Canadian peacekeeping forces. The Canadians who drink their local beer and “believe in peacekeeping, not policing, diversity, not assimilation” should be suited for that. Besides, I thought they did a great job in Bosnia?

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=beer+commerical+I+am+Canadian&view=detail&mid=CACEDCED930AF22A7CAFCACEDCED930AF22A7CAF&FORM=VIRE

    I see this a a face-saving resolution for 1) the Russians, 2) the Ukrainians and 3) Justin Trudeau.

    If the Russians balk at accepting this, we should ratched up their humiliation by substituting the French for the Canadians. And if they balk at that, substitute Bangladeshis and so on until they sign.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
  324. @Jack D

    They elected a Jew as their president.

    They also told him to fuck off when he tried to instantiate a cease fire and pull troops back from the Donbas, and threatened his life if he attempted to “capitulate”.

    ‘I’m not a loser’: Zelensky clashes with veterans over Donbas disengagement (VIDEO)

    • Replies: @HA
  325. @PiltdownMan

    If anything this is more similar to the Spanish Civil War in the late 1930s. Other nations sent material and weapons to both sides. It was almost like a dress rehearsal for WWII in some respects. The Germans developed low altitude dive bombing (think Stuka) and the tactics to use them in Spain (for one example). Germany didn’t do that to never use close air support again.

    We’re not “helping” Ukraine to avoid a fight. We’re learning about how our weapons work and how the people we fight react to them.

  326. Art Deco says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Go see for yourself. Russia’s affluent decile is almost entirely concentrated in Moscow, with some capital in St Petersburg and Sochi.
    ==
    Less than 10% of Russia’s population lives in greater Moscow, so that’s hardly likely. Moscow and St. Petersburg together account for 13%. Having lived in an affluent metropolis, I’m gonna wager both cities have an ample population of hourly service employees. (Greater Moscow has a per capita product about 2x that of the average Russian province).

  327. Art Deco says:
    @Jack D

    I think it was Dmitri Simes who referred to post 2003 Russia as ‘managed pluralism’. Putin is autocratic, but for the most part the country has an autonomous public life. As late as 1988, Soviet Russia was not as pluralistic as Putinist Russia has been throughout. The country was arguably more pluralistic internally during the period running from 1988 to 2004 and from 1905 to 1917, but has been well above the median if you assess the whole period from 1789 to the present. The period from 1988 to 2004 was one of considerable suffering for the country. Putin built a constituency by fostering an economic revival and restoring public order.

  328. Art Deco says:
    @Johann Ricke

    I don’t imagine he does. His security services will do that. The country’s economy has improved dramatically since 1995, so he indubitably has a constituency as well. Politcally, the place is absolutely retro. There are hardly any occidental or quasi-occidental countries as thoroughly autocratic as White Russia and the two or three which are are far less affluent.

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
  329. choxopox says:
    @Jack D

    Since the US is a member of the UN Security Council, the UN can do nothing about us. We have a veto. Thus the absence UN action means about as much as the failure to impeach Joe Biden indicates his innocence. You ought to know that.
    The trade sanctions, or some more subtle variation, will come. Russia, China, India, Iran, and now Saudi Arabia are forming a trade bloc, and we and Europe are not invited, but Brazil and Argentina will be. They are uniting against us, to ensure that any trade with us favors them.

    -Discard

    • Agree: BB753
  330. Ennui says:
    @Jack D

    My bet is Bernie Sanders probably would get at least half the commentators here if he ran on his 2016 platform. My bet is Sanders or Chomsky or Jews with similar non-interventionist politics on the right or left would probably generate more good will than many of the WASPs like the Bushes, Lyndon Johnson, or the Clintons.

    You might not be motivated by resentment of the Russians, but can you say the same for most Jewish Americans, particularly the hawks?

    Ukrainians have a country because of decisions made by the same imperial powers they lament. The Crimea is a case in point, it isn’t their ancient homeland. They wouldn’t have even dared settling there or even Odessa without the umbrella of the Russians, you know the people they bitch and moan about the most as if they were a plucky little nation that always defended themselves and gained their territory by themselves.

    If anything, Ukrainians are like Scots, a bunch of whiners who most definitely and gleefully participated in Imperialism. I’d be more inclined to give some sympathy to Khanty or Mansi.

    Speaking of which, genocide claims by the Ukrainians is also laughable. How many Russians have surnames ending in “ko”? This isn’t like the Turks or Kurds (another group of DC darlings) butchering Armenians, not to mention the Nazis slaughtering Jews. The Ukrainians might have undergone cultural repression perhaps (big perhaps), but this isn’t like white Australians settlers mowing down Aborigines or Boer commandos hunting San like animals.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  331. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    History is relevant because of what it tells us about the actions of the Russian leadership TODAY.

    A few days ago you said “Putin’s War is just the same age old Russian imperialism that’s been a bane upon human existence for about the past three centuries“. Then it is strange that America did not use its nuclear weapon monopoly to prevent Russia developing them, as Bertrand Russel and John Von Neuman suggested.

    There is some fantasy by Putinists that Russia hasn’t really been trying hard and if they would only change gears and seriously apply themselves to the war they could win.

    Clearly, a total military victory of Ukraine over Russia is not impossible, and in the opinion of many experts such a the German Brigadier Vad, Russia being blasted out of all internationally recognised Ukrainian territory the most likely outcome if the West continues its precision weapon re equipping aid and intel assistance at the current level .

    Indeed, I would note that Russian fortification building is not merely adding ever more layers further and further back in occupied territory as an additional backstop for the Ukrainian advance breaking through (apparently perceived to be quite likely judging by the intensity of construction)intent, but such a literally entrenched mindset would hardly be amenable to ending the war and accepting defeat to be final. Despite the weakness of its enemies, and winning crushing victories in every war. Israel has found the political aim of reconciling the Arabs remains elusive.

    All dictators love to saber rattle.

    One can argue that Russia was too slow to rattle its sabre when Beltway think tanks were scoffing at Russia being a factor that had to be taken into account when incorporating the former Soviet satellites. A range of people from Clinton to George Kennan understood from the beginning that giving Ukraine a path to membership was a path to a war.

    • Replies: @Jack D
  332. Anonymous[471] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I originally wrote a longer comment about how much shit Croatia is in, but it appears to have gotten lost. So I’ll keep it short this time.

    Study the history of guest workers in Europe, Bardon. Study it carefully.

    And when you walk through town, through any Croatian town, look around you, pay attention, and stop telling yourself not to believe your lying eyes.

    • Agree: vinteuil
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  333. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “’Revealed preferences’ just means people know an opportunity when they see one.

    In other words, it means people know Russia and China and all those supposedly Putin-loving countries are, in the grand scheme of things, existentially lame as far as opportunities go, PhysicistDave’s wistful longing for the good life of Beijing notwithstanding. Thanks for making that clear, if only implicitly. What was that word that Trump used for countries like that? I think the second syllable was “hole”.

    “do you think your average Arab, Indian or African (or Israeli) is willing to sacrifice their standard of living for Ukraine’s ‘freedom’”?

    They might well be willing to sacrifice their standard of living to get more and more countries to de-nuke the way Ukraine willingly did. That’s in everyone’s interest. And that’s only going to happen if the countries that arm-twisted them to the negotiating table agree to step up if, as a result of that de-nuking, the country in question finds itself in hot water. I mean, let’s not kid ourselves thinking that Russia would be doing any of this on a nuclear state. And to the extent that America might yet again be pulled into a European conflagration (as happened twice already), I should think they might be willing to have that take place on more favorable terms as opposed to waiting until the Soviet Union is restored to the extent that Putin desires. And those are motivated solely by crass self-interest — believe it or not, there are other ideals worth pitching in for, but these will do well enough.

    More to the point, given that the average Arab, etc., has not been deterred by American initiatives regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, who are you kidding, anyway? I mean, come on, will you at least read over what you write before hitting publish? What, you think we need to ask permission from every Arab and Indian who willingly chooses to come here — we’re talking clamoring around our shores — whether they approve of Ukraine? See, when you start raising ridiculous non sequiturs like that, that’s a clear sign your overall position is rock-bottom bankrupt, argument-wise.

    • Replies: @Ennui
    , @YetAnotherAnon
  334. HA says:
    @PhysicistDave

    Again, you prove you are not an American: no agreement is binding on the US unless it is ratified by the Senate.

    Who said it was “binding”? You’re telling me the only time you agree to live up to your agreements is when someone has a notarized document to the effect? Thanks for admitting what a sleazebag you are, but not everyone is like you. For some people, a signature is good enough. And that “non-binding” thing was never raised by Putin trolls like yourself when they wept copious tears over American perfidy regarding some “not one inch Eastward, ever” agreement the US made with Russia regarding NATO, which has no dates, signatures or anything else (i.e., it’s purely fictional).

    And aren’t you the clueless rube who thinks American police will take you seriously over an internet comment from one of your numerous detractors, to the extent that you’d try to threaten me with police action? I can find links for that, too, but as I recall, when I pointed out how ridiculous that was, you laughed it off saying that of course you weren’t serious because you were convinced I was a foreign national. But that implies you DO think the police would hunt me down on the basis of your whining to them if they knew I was indeed in the US. What kind of actual American is so stupid to think that’s how things work around here? How do we know some Chinese national (I mean, I’m sure the Chinese police have no problem with hunting down troublesome internet activity) hasn’t hijacked/catfished your identity in order to spew all that useful-idiot propaganda? THAT is the real question.

    I.e., yet again, PhysicistDave. You should look to your own failings before projecting them on me. If you truly are an American, or even if you occasionally let some Chinese troll handle your account in exchange for “favors”, maybe spend some time trying to figure out how things really do work here. I’m so sorry that of the three PhD’s in your marriage, none of them extended to anything as practical as being able to navigate a language that a billion Chinese seem to be able to handle without much difficulty, else you’d be gone to (or back in) Beijing already (though there is, of course, that other torturously insurmountable problem of Chinese university enrollment — can’t forget that riddle of the Sphinx either). Maybe you should ask for your tuition money back, or something, or spring for a duolingo subscription.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @PhysicistDave
  335. @Anonymous

    I constantly move through Croatian towns & I see only one Mongol woman working at the Zagreb train station & also, I’ve seen ca. 10-15 Nepalese & Filipinos in the past 3 months in three towns, population 30,000 to 60,000 around Croatia’s capital.

    Foreign non-European workers are somewhere around 15,000 in the whole country; they are vetted & they do not stay too long because of exploitation of Croatian greedy short-sighted “capitalists”.

    As far as “migrants” go- they are not here. We chased them out of the country. True, Serbia, which is porous, tried some stupid tricks with Iranians and Africans from Burundi & a few other African countries because these countries did not recognize Kosovo’s independence. But, these games were over after Hungary & Austria were fed up with Serbia’s games. I saw in the Zagreb central station, only at 8 p.m. or so, during the past 2-3 months, groups of blacks and Arabs- always 3-5 of them in a group, both males and females. Then, it ceased after we entered the Schengen zone.

    The coloreds, in Croatia- except for temporary workers- do not exist. We either chase them back to Bosnia & Herzegovina or dump them to Slovenia, Austria, Italy,…

    Unlike you- I know what I am seeing & know what I am talking about.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  336. HA says:
    @Jack D

    “That’s the problem – you have no historic memory. You are like those brain-damaged guys who meet their nurses anew every morning because they can’t remember what happened yesterday.”

    That’s the old Russia-troll two-step. On the one hand, Russia is superior because it is willing to take the long view, and its leaders have a collective memory that stretches back centuries, and unlike the perfidious West, Russia is willing to stick to its principles and agreements and allies through thick and thin.

    On the other hand, when Americans ARE willing to demonstrate an attention span extending beyond the latest Kardashian Tweet, and DO stand up even for agreements they signed place decades ago, people like Badwhite are all, oh, that was a while back and so it can’t possibly be relevant anymore.

  337. @Ennui

    My bet is Sanders or Chomsky or Jews with similar non-interventionist politics on the right or left would probably generate more good will…

    Chomsky is 94. Couldn’t you find someone born in the 1930s? The decade without a president.

    Yet. Hey, Pat… You’ve got time on your hands now!

    (Note the sign behind him. Can he be deported? He wasn’t born in America, but in the District of Columbia.)

  338. HA says:
    @Frank McGar

    “They also told him to f… off when he tried to instantiate a cease fire and pull troops back from the Donbas,…”

    If they did that only because he was a Jew and they were antisemitic thugs who would have happily let a gentile “negotiate” their country away without a second thought, you might have a point. As it is,… well, you do the math.

    • Replies: @Frank McGar
  339. • Replies: @HA
    , @Jack D
  340. Jack D says:
    @Sean

    in the opinion of many experts such a the German Brigadier Vad, Russia being blasted out of all internationally recognised Ukrainian territory the most likely outcome if the West continues its precision weapon re equipping aid and intel assistance at the current level

    .

    Now if Putin was thinking clearly and getting good advice, he might assess the probability that this is going to happen (and the reality that Russia has already lost vast quantities of men and materiel) and consider what he could salvage if he were to make a deal now vs. waiting for the Ukrainians to forcibly dislodge him from Crimea and the Donbas using Western missiles and planes. This is exactly what I am hoping Xi is going to tell him.

    Both sides are chest pounding about how they are going to win EVERYTHING (and one of them is by definition wrong). But I think if Xi brokered a deal where (just like the Koreas) there would be no agreement on final status and no agreement on neutrality but Putin agreed to withdraw to the Jan. 2022 lines, Zelensky would take that deal. Ukraine was more or less content with the 1/22 borders – they were not fight hard (or in the case of Crimea, at all) to move them. Moving the 1/22 borders was Putin’s idea.

    As you can see here by the Putin wannabees, I am not so sure that Putin is ready to take that deal YET. The Rushists still think that Russia is capable of holding all the territory that it already holds and are still hoping for even more gains in the future, so they see no reason to withdraw. Of course if Gen. Vad is right, it will be a mistake for Russia not to take that deal on the “half a loaf is better than none” principle but it wouldn’t be the first time that a pig headed dictator made a mistake. OTOH, Putin has complete control of the media space inside Russia so if he DID take a deal, Peskov and all the talking heads on Russian TV would be proclaiming that that deal was a glorious victory for Russia and the Russian public would buy it.

    • Replies: @Sean
  341. Sean says:
    @HA

    That agreement specified that Ukraine was not being given a “guarantee” by the US.

    It is trying to get an American guarantee (Nato Chapter 5) that caused all the trouble for Ukraine.

    The US strategy is that Ukraine is aided indirectly in a limited way to frustrate Russia until it gives up trying to win and goes home, which is a chain of reasoning whose end state is dependent on Russian reactions to being bested that no one in the West has any control over.

    • Replies: @HA
  342. Corvinus says:
    @Ennui

    “Indeed, if recent history is proof, many immigrants want to come here, benefit from the advantages America offers, AND use the military or assets of “their fellow Americans” to advance their tribal grievances back home.”

    OK, what specific groups? Exactly how? You haven’t proven anything here.

    • Replies: @Ennui
  343. vinteuil says:
    @AnotherDad

    a bunch of commenters here have bought into some low-rent Putin’s the white savior b.s. (Seriously, Chechen war, millions of illegals from the ‘stans, muzzie asses in the air mooning Moscow, yeah Putin really cares about self-determination in the Donbas or the welfare of Russians. About as much a Joe Biden cares about Americans.) These guys are just cheap dates for Putin’s old-as-the-hills Russian imperialism. That is truly pathetic.

    Really? A bunch? Putin’s the white savior? cheap dates for Russian imperialism?

    Would you mind naming names?

    Who are these unpatriotic conservatives of of whom you speak?

    • Replies: @Ennui
  344. HA says:
    @Sean

    “That agreement specified that Ukraine was not being given a ‘guarantee’ by the US.”

    No duh. Have you looked at the SALT documentation? Volumes and volumes. Every jot and tiddle required endless negotiation. It took years. And as for a guarantee, as in “blank check”? Forget about it. Given the constraints we were under, there was no realistic way to try and work through that to everyone’s satisfaction. I mean do you think we were the only ones not willing to get into details? I’m guessing the Russians likewise weren’t really eager to get into specifics about how the US would respond to a violation.

    But that doesn’t mean we now get to skip away scot-free. Agreements can mean something even without Senate ratification. If you doubt that, then again, look to that not-one-inch-eastward-ever NATO agreement that we were supposed to honor, and horrid of us to have disregarded it. That would indeed have been an issue, were it not for the fact that, as I’ve noted, it’s purely fictional. Why do the Russia trolls have no problem demanding we honor some fictional handshake agreement while at the same time insisting that the Budapest Memorandum is a mere “scrap of paper”? , a kind of thinking which historically speaking, doesn’t seem to end well.

    So just pretend we’re talking about that ironclad not-one-inch-eastward-ever NATO document, with the added distinction that the Budapest Memorandum actually exits. Maybe then it will start to seem less confusing to you.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Sean
  345. @HA

    Zelensky being a Jew doesn’t negate the existence of the radical right element in the country. I was assuming that was the point of his comment? In any case, they are driven more by their anti-Russia hatred than anything else. They’ll work with a Jew like Zelensky, as long as he doesn’t “capitulate”.

    • Agree: PhysicistDave
  346. Jack D says:
    @HA

    In a sense ALL international agreements are “mere scraps of paper” in the absence of a true enforcement mechanism. (Of course as you point out, imaginary agreements, such as the “agreement” not to expand NATO, are even less than that.) So Russia was “free” to violate the Budapest Memo and the West was free to impose sanctions and send weapons to Ukraine to punish Russia for its violation.

  347. Ennui says:
    @Corvinus

    Cubans, Ukrainians, South Sudanese, Ahmed Chalabi and his ilk, CAIR, anti-Ghaddafi Libyans like that snake Haftar, Kuwaitis, Yemenis on both sides of the Civil War, pro-Shah Iranians and/or anti-Mullah Iranians, Poles (particularly during the Cold War), Taiwanese, Balkan (insert ethnicity here), and, of course, our greatest ally.

    Feel free to hyphenate with American any of the above

    My road to Damascus moment for this realization was watching a news program in the 1990’s with an Albanian and a Serb (both American citizens) screaming at each other and talking about what America needed to do. I realized then that those two people could have given a rats ass about the rest of us, we were just means to a blood feud end.

    The Armenians were formerly a diaspora with some victimization (genuinely earned) clout, but I think they now realize that in the hierarchy of victims, they are not as far up as they thought.

    • Thanks: PhysicistDave, Mark G.
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  348. HA says:
    @Cagey Beast

    “If anything the precedent was already set back in 1953, when Eisenhower said his threats of ‘nuclear blackmail’ against China ended the Korean war…”

    Really? 1953, you say? Did the author of that tweet forget about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I’m pretty sure at least some ultimatums were issued prior to the drop of Fat Man and Little Boy, throughout the course of WWII, that there would be dire repercussions if the Japanese did not surrender, and they no doubt had at least a few spies (or at least their allies did) alerting them to what the US was cooking up over in Los Alamos.

    The point is, that there’s plenty of stuff that went on with nukes once upon a time. Dreams of suitcase-sized nukes. Fulda Gap and Davy Crocketts and so on. It doesn’t mean any of that is still a-OK (or that it ever was). That descent into a chaos where everybody who had ever even heard about the 2nd amendment could potentially get a couple of nukes in his car trunk, just in case his long-suffering girlfriend ever dissed him and he needed to teach her a lesson (which is basically what Moscow is doing right now to Kyiv), is why we, more or less as a species, came together and signed lots of agreements and protocols, all leading to the conclusion that nukes are something to be avoided at all costs.

    Yes, that does mean that whenever some lunatic starts waving around a gun or nuke in order to get his way, and the authorities are alerted, there is a short-term increase in the odds of that weapon being used. But that’s just how it is. If you’re really OK with everyone using a gun or nuke to get what he wants, get a law passed to that effect. Build up a coalition and decades-long body of documents and negotiations leading inevitably to that conclusion. As for the rest of us, we’re sticking with the opposite direction.

    Again, the level of these so-called arguments illustrate only how desperate the Moscow trolls are. At this point, any straw will do.

    • Replies: @Zelo
    , @PhysicistDave
  349. Ennui says:
    @vinteuil

    We could collectively scream that we hate Putin or don’t care about it him, but it wouldn’t matter.

    These people are no different than those rainbow flag mouth-breathers asking how much we get paid in rubles.

    They ignore arguments that Zelensky is a friend/ally of our enemies and is therefore an enemy. No, it must be because we view Putin as a savior. It’s a little bit of projection because the pro-Ukrainian sorts here are basically classical liberals who have been cut off in traffic or vaguely worried while walking down the street by “youths” one too many times. As classical liberals, they need a cause, a hero, to support. A bunch of low-rent Lord Byrons. If it wasn’t the Ukrainians, it would be the Kurds. The same arguments were used in the 2000’s about those objects of DC largess/ catspaws for DC and Tel Aviv.

    Not wanting to experience inflation and resenting Eastern European brazen sense of entitlement and historical obfuscation regarding dubious territorial claims is the equivalent of kowtowing to the neo-tsar?

  350. Ennui says:
    @HA

    You guys are the ones citing UN statements to argue that “the whole world” rises in righteous condemnation of the Russian invasion of the Ukraine. I’m pointing out they might criticize, but that’s all they are going to do.

    “The world” is saying “hey, Russia, that’s kind of bad.” But that’s very different from arming the Ukraine and prolonging the war and being nearly hysterical about the Ukraine. That’s a US-Europe thing (with our little buddies like Japan and Taiwan).

    So, what is it. We cite “world opinion” to justify the Ukrainian struggle against the neo-Soviet horde? Or do we wave their opinions away as irrelevant browns?

    It’s pretty clear what you goal post moving hucksters do. The sheer brazenness and mendacity of pro-Ukrainian propaganda remains shocking.

    And while I’m at it, what did AMLO and Lula say about the war? World opinion and all that?

    • Replies: @HA
  351. Jack D says:
    @Cagey Beast

    “Nuclear blackmail” only works (to the extent that it works at all) if the other power doesn’t have nuclear weapons (as the Chinese did not in 1953). So the Russians can’t “nuclear blackmail” the US because they know that if they actually try it that Moscow gets incinerated. The US has already told Russia not to use nukes in Ukraine or else.

    #2, the Rushist method is always to find the WORST thing that the US ever did and use it as a license to do the same. When you were 6 years old, didn’t your mother tell you, “if your friend jumps off the roof, that doesn’t make it OK for you to do it too.” Maybe it wasn’t right for Eisenhower to do this in the first place? Maybe the situations are not the same? Maybe standards have changed in the last 60 years. In 1953, mothers used to ride around unbelted with their kids on their laps in the front seat while they smoked Lucky Strikes. Just because the US did something 60 years ago doesn’t make it OK for Russia to do it today.

  352. @ben tillman

    I take it it was your ancestor and namesake who defeated his, in a 19th century Congressional race?

  353. Zelo says:
    @HA

    So-called Russian trolls are incredibly rare and not very effective. I know it’s an insul to throw at someone but it’s not an accurate depiction of what’s going on.

    Russians are clumsy at propaganda. The Communists were good at it in Hollywood and all over the West. But most of them were Jews.

    • Agree: PiltdownMan, ben tillman
    • Replies: @Jack D
  354. @HA

    The enemy alien HA wrote to me:

    Who said [the Budapest Memorandum] was “binding”? You’re telling me the only time you agree to live up to your agreements is when someone has a notarized document to the effect? Thanks for admitting what a sleazebag you are, but not everyone is like you. For some people, a signature is good enough.

    An agreement made by the President of the United States but not ratified by the US Senate is an agreement solely with the individual then serving as President.

    It is not an agreement made by the United States of America — unless it is ratified by the US Senate.

    Complain if you wish to Bill Clinton that he has not managed to convince future Presidents to follow through on the agreement he personally made: I suspect he will just tell you that you are a stupid alien who is ignorant of the American Constitution.

    Which you are.

    As Sean hinted to you, and as a bit of googling will confirm, the US parties in the negotiations over the Budapest Memoranda insisted on using the phrase “security assurance” rather than “security guarantee” to make clear that the US would not act to enforce the Pesty Memos — and they made that clear to the Ukrainians at the time.

    What you are really complaining about is that the Ukrainians were damn fools who could not understand what they were told. Of course, pretty much all Slavs — aside from the Great Russians — are indeed damn fools. Take you or Peter Akuleyev or Bardon Kaldian — Euro-trash all.

    Of course, if we did take the Pesty Memos seriously, the US violated them by orchestrating the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014.

    And Putin was actually honoring the Pesty Memos in February 2022 by intervening to protect Ukrainians against the murderous actions of the illegal US-controlled puppet regime in Kiev.

    But of course you do not care.

    You are just a brazen apologist for the Penis-Piano-Playing dictator in Kiev who has shut down opposition parties, who is now closing churches, and who of course has murdered thousands in the Donbass.

    Does he pay you?

    You are also некультурный.

    In any case, the opinion polls show that the American people are ceasing to support the criminal regime in Kiev that you are working for: only a minority of Republican voters still support aid to the puppet regime.

    There must be a negotiated peace in Ukraine based on the self-determination of peoples enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter and applied to the peoples of the Donbass.

    So that the killing can stop.

  355. @HA

    Our little enemy alien HA wrote to Cagey Beast:

    I’m pretty sure at least some ultimatums were issued prior to the drop of Fat Man and Little Boy, throughout the course of WWII, that there would be dire repercussions if the Japanese did not surrender, and they no doubt had at least a few spies (or at least their allies did) alerting them to what the US was cooking up over in Los Alamos.

    It seems that your ignorance of history is as great as your ignorance of everything else.

    No, the Soviets did indeed penetrate the Los Alamos operation.

    But there has never been any evidence that the Axis Powers did so.

    As a physicist, I not only have read a great deal about the Manhattan Project but I also knew some guys who worked in it: e.g., my mentor in physics, Dick Feynman, and a manager I worked for in industry.

    As usual, little buddy, you are just making stuff up to serve your Penis-Piano-Playing master.

    How much is he paying you?

    There must be a negotiated peace in Ukraine based on the self-determination of peoples enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter and applied to the peoples of the Donbass.

    So that the killing will stop.

    • Replies: @HA
  356. @Jack D

    Jack D wrote to Ennui:

    You completely misunderstand the relevance of history.

    This from the guy who recently declared (see here):

    the USA, which is a country that was created by and only exists under its Constitution.

    For all of the enemy aliens here, like Jack D himself, of course, the United States existed for more than a decade prior to the writing of the Constitution, and the fact that the United States already existed was noted in Article VI of the Constitution.

    Jack, I know your knowledge of history is even less than your knowledge of quantum field theory, so let us fill you in:

    The crazy Eastern Europeans dragged the world into a World War in 1914.

    And then they did it again in 1939.

    And now you crazy Eastern Europeans want to do it again.

    You see, some of us, unlike you, do know history.

    Jack D also wrote:

    The idea that the Jews in general or me in particular are somehow getting even for the pogroms is ridiculous.

    For some reason, a disproportionate number of Jews really, really hate Russia.

    You yourself keep lecturing us on the eternal evils of the Russian soul.

    Which is rather bizarre, because one might think you would welcome Russia as a counter-balance to Germany.

    I guess you forgot that the Germans sort of weren’t real nice to the Jews?

    Or perhaps you are just really, really stupid. Or an enemy alien.

    I mean you did write:

    the USA, which is a country that was created by and only exists under its Constitution.

    • Replies: @BB753
  357. Anonymous[420] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Unlike you- I know what I am seeing & know what I am talking about.

    And why do you think I’m so worked up about this? I know very well what I’m talking about. And, unlike some, I’m not an HDZ sycophant… sorry, eternal optimist, so I can afford to be honest about it. I see more visible foreigners every day before lunch than you claim to have seen in the past 3 months. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere, I’m forced to conclude you’re lying. Or maybe the self-delusion is just that powerful.

    We either chase them back to Bosnia & Herzegovina or dump them to Slovenia, Austria, Italy,…

    We do whatever our Western masters are telling us to do at any given time. And there are still plenty of “refugees” around. But with HDZ just opening the borders, illegals are sadly the least of our problems.

    Btw, how about all the recent articles talking about drastically increasing the numbers of South Asians brought in? Or better yet, the ones about considering giving loans to foreign workers to facilitate obtaining homes and family reunification? Think they might be preparing the population for something? Like, for example, the things that have been very clearly spelled out? Nah, silly me, surely the crooks in charge would never do that!

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  358. Sean says:
    @HA

    https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

    “U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous ‘not one inch eastward’ assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991. … The documents show that … subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons [memoranda of conversations] and telcons [telephone conversations] at the highest levels.”

    As to what led Ukraine to to renounce nuclear weapons forever more, it was an American assurance well short of a written guarantee–a bit like what Russia got over Nato expansion–and money.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum#Preliminaries
    Another key point was that U.S. State Department lawyers made a distinction between “security guarantee” and “security assurance”, referring to the security guarantees that were desired by Ukraine in exchange for non-proliferation. “Security guarantee” would have implied the use of military force in assisting its non-nuclear parties attacked by an aggressor (such as Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for NATO members)

    There was no room for misunderstanding by anyone. Ukraine’s government knew exactly what they were agreeing to because it was in the text of negotiation record part of the treaty where American diplomats insisted on the definition of their country’s commitment under the treaty not amounting to a guarantee being in black and white. Ukraine raised last minute objections to the financial compensation, and Bill Clinton arranged a supplementary payment.

    Clearly, Ukraine thought it needed to secure additional assurances from Russia and America. In 1997 Ukraine signed the “Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation … which fixed the principle of strategic partnership, the recognition of the inviolability of existing borders, and respect for territorial integrity and mutual commitment not to use its territory to harm the security of each other“.

    Yeltsin–and early in his presidency Putin–asked if Russia could join Nato and got fobbed off . The US foreign policy establishment seemed to have assumed that Russia could be ignored. According to a recent podcast by Michael Kofman (just back from Bakmut) he noted that twenty odd years ago everyone in Washington was openly saying that Russian power was in terminal decline and did not need to be taken account of.

    On April Fool’s day 2008 George Bush said he “strongly supported” Ukraine join Nato, and warned he would not allow Russia’s objections to prevent the membership. Bush also said that the location US missile defence system bases in already existing Nato members of eastern Europe was not open to negotiation with Russia and there would be no concession to the Kremlin (the US insisted the bases were to counteract Iranian ICBM that did not then exist and still do not exist) . Later that week at the annual Nato conference, Ukraine was peremptorily accepted as a future member with an unspecified delay and Georgia was too.

    Nemesis had only months to wait until Georgia was invaded by Russia, but the 2008 Bucharest Nato conference announcement that Ukraine would become a member continued to be reiterated each year (most recently in mid 2021), and actually going ahead with granting Ukraine ‘s membership continued to be pushed by elements in the US and especially Poland. Russia placed its hope in tits Minsk proposals even after Zelensky rejected them in 2019, but in 2021 Ukraine definitively rejected them as constraining its independence, because Donbass would be part of Ukraine yet be able to veto the country as a whole joining Nato. In late 2021, and in what Russia said was a contravention of the mutually agreed limitation on the type of weapons to be used there, Ukraine began using Javelins and drones supplied by Nato members the US and Turkey in Donbass. Ukraine was quite clearly a Eurasian country basing its foreign policies on the assumption that it will join NATO, which is an Atlanto-European anti Russia alliance with overwhelming conventional superiority.

    • Replies: @HA
  359. BB753 says:
    @PhysicistDave

    It’s pointless to discuss with the likes of Jack D, HA, Johnsson, etc. Neocons gotta neocon. They won’t stop until they destroy America as a tool to police the world in line with their petty interests, grudges and ambitions. And it’s coming..

    • Replies: @nebulafox
  360. @Anonymous

    This is a classical way of obscurantist nonsense about the ruling HDZ.

    I’ll just state a few points (although this is o no interest to the people here- just for unmasking Serbian trolls & Croatian dummies):

    I said a long time ago that Plenković’s HDZ is the most successful and the best government in the Republic of Croatia after 2000.

    Plenković is our best politician after Tuđman, absolutely unparalleled. Everyone else can only shine his shoes. In the last 5-6 years, he has achieved an enormous amount of success, with minimal losses.

    [MORE]

    Plus:

    * overturned road monetization, which SDP and others wanted

    * we survived the impact of the collapse of Todorić’s false inflated empire, which could have brought down the state and turned it into a colony

    * dribbled Slovenes around Piran, and that’s where they finally lost

    * blocked the Bosnian Muslims and we finally got the Pelješac Bridge

    * by a persistent struggle behind the scenes, and I have been following him for 5 years, he managed to prepare the ground for an attack on OHR manipulations in B&H, and finally overthrew the pro-Muslim policy through Schmidt’s amendments, and thereby forever destroyed the possibility of a Muslim domination over Croats in B & H, against the opposition of Russia, Turkey and crazy Germany, combined with a significant part of the EU

    * The Republic of Croatia is in a big plus in the EU in terms of finances

    * Standard & Poor and similar successes

    * €, Schengen – these are great successes that will only yield results

    * embarked on serious reconstruction of the Croatian Armedforces, especially air force and anti-aircraft defense – something all governments, whether SDP or HDZ, have been obstructing

    * chased from the stage anti-Croat noisemakers who were deified in the era of Josipović and the like – Teršelič, Tomić the shithead etc.

    * overcame the Covid crisis without extreme measures, practically minimal – Italy only a month or two ago abolished masks in public transport, and France did the same

    * The Republic of Croatia has growth that surpassed that of most SE countries

    So, Plenković is an extremely successful politician, practically unparalleled, and more positive for his country than the politicians of far more important countries such as Sweden, Germany, France, …

    Regarding the Istanbul Convention – this is completely unimportant. It is obvious that he promised the EU that he would push it through, but that has no meaning in our culture (parent 1 and 2, transgender, etc.). These are collective diseases of the Anglosphere and Scandinavian countries, while in France and Italy, let alone here or in the Czech Republic, it has no bearing on reality. It does not belong in our society or culture and is completely marginal.

    What the government did not succeed in, or did not even try, are the reform of the legal system (here the EU is good as a corrective), the national media in Croatian hands- I mean newspapers (there is also part of the blame on the so-called Croatian right wingers, who are stupid and don’t understand that successful daily and weekly should have a larger offer than Bleiburg and Jasenovac), and in the slowness of reconstruction after the earthquake. But one should analyze what the government, anyone, can accomplish, with regulations that are different for various EU countries.

    The last is the tendency of Croats to envy, lament; chock-full of naivety and stupidity, and possessed with a kind of gray mentality not conductive to efficient work, development, functionality and optimism.

    No politician, even a super-genius, can do much here. With this kind of people, and this kind of elite, our government is the best after Tuđman, and now we are living in decadent, opportunistic & unhistorical times.

    As far as myth about Plenković’s supposed Brussels servitude, I can only quote Michael Corleone before he got his brother-in-law whacked: Do not insult my intelligence.

    What some trolls “see” is as important as “fake” Moon landing.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  361. vinteuil says:
    @nebulafox

    This is, in contempt of question, the most interesting comment I’ve ever read here.

    nebulafox – as I understand it, you’re an American living in China – is that right?

    • Replies: @nebulafox
  362. Jack D says:
    @Zelo

    I agree with you. There are far too many accusations of people being paid agents both ways. Very few are and the few that are are usually not very good.

    Rather you have people who have adopted the Russian (or Ukrainian) POV for their own reasons (“reasons” not being the same thing as “ethnic grudges”) – it somehow ties in with their political and general world view. In the case of the Rushists, it is that Globohomo Imperial America is bad and needs to be cut down a notch and that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

  363. Corvinus says:
    @Ennui

    You do realize you are committing an attributional error, right? But then again, given your elitist proclivity (don’t blame me, blame HbD), I should not be surprised. Certainly there are individuals within those groups, especially first generation folks, who harbor those feelings toward their former homeland. But how are certain it is the entire lot or supermajority who have that outlook?

    We can also look to the German-Americans of WW1 and the Japanese-Americans of WW2. They bitterly fought against their countrymen on behalf of America. There were profound accusations of disloyalty by nativists, but that never materialized in the way they had claimed it would turn out.

    “the 1990’s with an Albanian and a Serb (both American citizens) screaming”

    And I recall a particular moment at a bar around the same time period in which two people from those ethnicities said that while it was tragic what was going on there, they both agreed that American intervention was unnecessary. You’d think they would take out a knife or a gun and murder one another, but they did not engage in that conduct.
    They say and drank and talked.

    “Feel free to hyphenate with American any of the above”

    That includes your own ancestors. You have to go back.

    “that in the hierarchy of victims“

    Oh, by far, you and your ilk are near the top of that totem pole, Kemosabe.

  364. @James B. Shearer

    But this is invalid because “pro-Russia” is a label that Jack D puts on people like me, not something I self-identify with, while “pro-Ukraine” (in the case of Jack D, who actually identifies as Ukrainian ethnicity with family in Ukraine) or “pro-GAE” ( in the case of Steve Sailer, who thinks Russia should be “punished” for violating borders established in international governmental bodies) are labels that people self-identify as. Steve wants to label as “brave” Ukrainian non-volunteer conscripts who are sacrificed in a meat grinder against their wishes–that is “dulce et decorum” territory, so he should be happy to send his son to fight to take back Crimea to punish Russia.

  365. Anonymous[123] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    No one said he’s not among the more capable from that gang, though the bar is low. As those living in containers years after the earthquake could tell you. But what does that ultimately matter to the people? Is everyone just supposed to be ecstatic that the GDP is growing, everything else be damned?

    What matters is that he’s cramming the country full of foreign workers “doing the jobs Croatians just won’t do” (and yet Croatians were doing them just fine just a couple of years ago) and “so the crops don’t rot in the fields” (the crops being lazy millennials and zoomers’ food and grocery orders). Same old, same old. We’ve seen it play out in so many countries, but sure, it’ll be different for Croatia.

    I notice while singing your idol’s (or boss’s?) praises, you didn’t comment on the history of “guest” workers in Europe. Or on all the articles already preparing the population for just that to play out.

    As far as myth about Plenković’s supposed Brussels servitude, I can only quote Michael Corleone before he got his brother-in-law whacked: Do not insult my intelligence.

    Good Lord, you’re beyond helping. But don’t worry, I’m not even blaming the EU here. It’s not like HDZ needs to be ordered to greedily wreck the country.

    Regarding the Istanbul Convention – this is completely unimportant. It is obvious that he promised the EU that he would push it through, but that has no meaning in our culture (parent 1 and 2, transgender, etc.). These are collective diseases of the Anglosphere and Scandinavian countries, while in France and Italy, let alone here or in the Czech Republic, it has no bearing on reality.

    Its worse in the Anglosphere, but no, sadly that doesn’t mean so-called transgenderism “has no bearing on reality” elsewhere in the West.

    It does not belong in our society or culture and is completely marginal.

    You don’t know any young urbanites, do you? I guess you being an octogenarian from the middle of nowhere would explain a lot.

    Yes, transgenderism is new in Croatia, so of course it’s not yet as common as it is in the West. But it’s growing. Just recently half the country was extolling the virtues and normality of transgenderism while defending the transgender Croatian on trial in Zambia for child trafficking and the rest of her woke child snatching pals. How exactly is that a society much healthier than the West?

    But I’m sure that too will turn out different for Croatia! Man, Croatia sure is special.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  366. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Also, your list of his achievements is overblown at best, but, as you’ve said, no need to get too deep into that discussion here.

  367. nebulafox says:
    @vinteuil

    Southeast Asia: I split my time between different countries in the region and the US.

    I did live in the PRC, but that was years ago.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
  368. HA says:
    @Sean

    “As to what led Ukraine to to renounce nuclear weapons forever more, it was an American assurance well short of a written guarantee”

    So even you admit it was the Americans whose assurances led Ukraine to renounce nukes, thereby setting themselves up for their current predicament.

    For those who aren’t sleazebags, that is all the evidence needed to admit an obligation to help them out now. Whereas for those who ARE sleazebags, no evidence will ever suffice. Pick a team.

    • Replies: @Sean
  369. nebulafox says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    I think it’s better to look in more modern history for appropriate historical parallels. One of the problems with Iraq was that everybody thought “new Vietnam” when they really should have thought “bigger Yugoslavia”.

    >Preserving North Korea as a buffer state to keep hostile U.S. land forces at a reasonable distance from the Chinese border was worth a lot to the Chinese. Mao would have far preferred to get the U.S. off the Korean Peninsula entirely, which would have been a much better buffer that eliminated any avenue for future ground attack entirely.

    Another underrated factor for the Chinese was making Pyongyang their satellite instead of Moscow’s after the events of 1950 permanently alienated the DPRK’s leadership from the USSR. Mao would have much rather had Taiwan, but making Kim his man instead of Stalin’s was a consolation prize.

    It worked until 1956. As I’ve said before, I have no evidence for this, but my hunch is that Mao underestimated how much Kim’s attitude toward his Communist “brothers” would change as a result of essentially being used as a pawn by both of them. The entire faction of pro-Chinese Korean Communists with ties to Mao going back to the Yan’an days got purged.

    >But the Chinese were fighting the U.S. military directly and simply lacked the ability to push the U.S. out, given its superiority in resources and firepower. So they had to settle for half-a-loaf, i.e. half of Korea.

    The PRC’s ultimate goal was retaking Taiwan and establishing centralized control over China: essentially, the exact same goal Chiang Kai-Shek had and would continue to have until his death in 1975. And that meant dealing with everything from Tibetans who didn’t recognized Beijing’s authority to disgruntled Uighurs to rogue KMT generals in Burma. When you get right down to it, Chiang and Mao wanted the same thing: an end to the latest “warring states” period in Chinese history. Nationalism was important, but secondary to that-they were willing to cut deals with whatever old colonial powers were needed to get it done. Ideology was important, but secondary to that-they were perfectly willing to work with people from ideological camps they despised to get closer to that goal in the short-term. They couldn’t both do it, and both men understood this.

    Even if they hadn’t been preoccupied elsewhere, the PLA was coming off a brutal civil war. America, by contrast, had just launched the arms buildup that would determine the trajectory of the Cold War. As the events of 1951 and 1952 showed, when Ridgeway thoroughly cleaned the PLA’s clocks and multiple Chinese offensives bloodily failed, the PRC at that point simply lacked the ability to stand toe-to-toe with a superpower, whatever their domestic propaganda claimed. Peng Dehuai’s takeaways from the failure of Chinese tactics in the Korean War laid the basis for the modern Chinese military.

    The whole reason the war happened was because they lacked the naval and air capacity to invade Taiwan and finish Chiang Kai-Shek off. Only the Soviets could help with that, and I’ve already explained why a fully united, undistracted China was the last thing Stalin wanted. One of the curious side effects of the Korean war was the signing of an official peace treaty with Japan, confirming they were our main ally in the region. Try explaining that to someone in the 1930s.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  370. nebulafox says:
    @PhysicistDave

    >Let’s be blunt: for historical and familial reasons, an awful lot of Jews hate, really deeply hate, Eastern Slavs.

    Which is stupid in multiple ways. Firstly, Putin is on the whole mildly Judeo-philic and Zelensky (while Jewish himself) does have ultra-nationalists flying the flags of the 14th Galician working for him. Secondly, after WWII, Soviet Jews rapidly assimilated and intermarried into the mainstream Soviet populace thanks to a combination of the old Pale being destroyed in the Holocaust and heavy-handed Soviet “encouragement”. Israel today has the largest Russian speaking populace outside the former USSR as a result. Zelensky is a native Russian speaker.

    Meanwhile, people like the Rosenbergs spied for a regime that was unleashing openly anti-Semitic purges at the time. Because America was, I dunno, fascist or something. Exact same “logic” you see on the Left today when it comes to America. Funny that.

    I understand the Ukrainian attitude toward Russia, even if I don’t think that should play any factor in American decision-making whatsoever: would you trust a man who admires a guy who starved millions of you and attempted to crush your culture? But the American Jewish one is just further proof that they inhabit a mental universe that ceased to exist many decades ago.

    >But the Old Testament is a very bloody-minded document, and lots of Jews are raised to revere it.

    Depends on the time period, to some extent: the Old Testament isn’t one book, after all. On the whole, though, I don’t find it more or less bloody-minded than historical contemporaries. The earliest non-Biblical reference we get to the ancient Israelites is from an Egyptian Pharaoh who left a stone bragging about the various genocides and deportations he was implementing in the Levant at the time, and the early books were likely reconstructions of dimly remembered historical events, not too dissimilar from Homer’s reconstruction of the (no less genocidal) Trojan War.

    The ancient world was not a very nice place if you were defeated or low on the social scale. Matter of fact, neither was the medieval world. Or the early modern world. The sacking of cities or mass slaughter of non-combatants was a standard part of warfare until a surprisingly recent date for most of the world, including nations we’d think of as civilized: the Taiping Rebellion or the British suppression of the Indian mutiny. We’ve come a long way in the last couple centuries.

  371. HA says:
    @PhysicistDave

    “the Soviets did indeed penetrate the Los Alamos operation. But there has never been any evidence that the Axis Powers did so.”

    They didn’t have to do any penetration of Los Alamos in order to have some inkling that nasty stuff was about to happen (even if the exact nature of the bombs in question remained unspecified). They could read leaflets, couldn’t they?

    Read this carefully as it may save your life or the life of a relative or friend. In the next few days, some or all of the cities named on the reverse side will be destroyed by American bombs.

    And for the record, I don’t give a flip if your wife is Chinese, given that Chinese have been flocking to America since the Gold Rush. But once you decide to publicize your desire to hightail it off to her ancestral land (I mean, regardless of the fact that you admit to being too dumb and decrepit to follow through) you can drop the me-so-proud-American shtick. For all I know, your wife is a far more honorable American than you, her tragically poor matrimonial choices notwithstanding (though that isn’t a high bar). Lucky for all those Eastern European women that, unlike your pitiable wife, they were smarter enough to spurn your creepy overtures — which would explain your unhinged sour-grapes routine.

  372. nebulafox says:
    @BB753

    Fundamentally stupid age alert: McConnell’s wearing a faggy little blue and yellow striped tie these days. I haven’t been paying attention to politics for a bunch of reasons, but I saw it on the TV the other days. Good Lord, it’s humiliating, but what more can you expect from this generation? They’ve made it clear that they view their own country as an abstraction to be used without restraint, and the people as obstacles at best or enemies at worst.

    It’s a simple, binary question: does our political leadership get replaced (in whatever way) or does America get ground down beyond repair? Because what they are doing is not sustainable, least of all in conjunction with technological trends. It’s a testimony to what they destroyed that their policies got supported for 30 years. At least I hope it isn’t. Having a perma-depressed, unhealthy populace kept in line by anarcho-tyranny is even bleaker.

    • Agree: BB753
  373. HA says:

    “So-called Russian trolls are incredibly rare and not very effective.”

    As I’ve noted numerous times, I use troll as a synechdoche that includes not just paid agents, but also fellow travelers and useful idiots. I used to be more partial to “fanboy” as a more appropriate catch-all, but the precious little flowers got mighty indignant about that, and hey, I aim to please, even though I obviously can’t please everyone.

    While that grouping is indeed a minority in the US, claiming they’re incredibly rare is pushing it. And the trolls don’t have to be very effective in order to have their tweets and memes rebroadcast by the gullible little edgelords we see on display in this thread. Some of the latter don’t even bother to read what they themselves post in any detail, so expecting them to critically analyze Moscow’s propaganda to see if it actually makes ay sense before reposting it is to expect far too much of them.

  374. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “’The world’ is saying ‘hey, Russia, that’s kind of bad.’ But that’s very different from arming the Ukraine and prolonging the war and being nearly hysterical about the Ukraine.”

    The one hysterically prolonging the war is the one who was hysterical enough to throw his army across a neighboring border and into Ukraine n the first place and is now prolonging their presence there. But all you’re willing to say about that is “kind of bad”. If you were really against prolonging wars and hysteria, … well, again, do the math as to whether or not you’re fooling yourself.

    And as ridiculous as you’re managing to be, even you are apparently willing to let slip that all this “the world is actually on Putin’s side” is a load of garbage.

    As for AMLO and Lula, when they are able to manage their countries to the extent that their citizens stop flooding America’s borders, I’ll take their advice on how the world should be run a little more seriously. Were you not grasping at straws for anything at all that you desperately hope could aid your viewpoint, you’d agree with me.

    • Replies: @Sean
  375. @Anonymous

    Typical rant without arguments.

    I’ll repeat:

    1. Croats who emigrated in the past 10+ years did so for various reasons, and the chief are a combination of corrupt, inept & inert Mediterranean-Balkan mentality & structural weakness of the Croatian economy. Out of 7 women and men I know personally & who went to Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands, only one had a real reason to do that. Others have gone due to sheer stupidity & lemming mentality. Lazy socialist state of mind cannot be eradicated in a moment. Slovenes, Czechs, Hungarians,… did not move out in such percentages because they possess central European work ethic & mentality; Croats, being a “hybrid” three-cultural people (central European, Mediterranean & Balkan civilizational circles) simply were not capable enough, in the past 10-15 years, psychologically & economically, to sustain that level of self-sufficiency. Good luck to them, I wouldn’t like to see them back. Serbs, Romanians, Bulgarians ..did move out in much higher percentages because these are even more typically Balkan corrupt, lazy & stupid societies.

    In other areas, people who are capable & not afraid of life, show initiative, which can easily be checked. People change.:

    https://qr.ae/prm1iy

    https://qr.ae/prFu4q

    https://qr.ae/prFuYs

    https://qr.ae/prm1eB

    2. as far as foreign, non-European workers go, they number between 10-20,000 thousands (most of the foreign workers are Balkaneros, from Serbs, Muslims..to Albanians and Macedonians), a drop in the ocean. They’ll eventually move out because they’re incompatible with Croatian society & the re-structuring of Croatia’s economy is underway, which makes most types of such jobs unnecessary. And- foreign laborers in some areas are a characteristic of all modern societies, especially outside of Europe (Israel, Saudi Arabia,…), so hysterical reactions to them are a sign of parochial immaturity & ignorance. They won’t stay in the country; they don’t belong here; they have no permanent residence status & are not citizens.

    But, this “discussion” is meaningless because: a) most people here don’t know/care what it’s all about, b) you have not given any reasonable argument, just a typical emotional (and bad mannered) rant.

    EOD

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  376. Ennui says:

    HA,

    You bums just want our money.

    • Replies: @HA
  377. Sean says:
    @HA

    They are being helped–they’re still in the fight aren’t they? The US strategy is for Russia to get fed up and quit. To help discourage Russia from thinking it can ever win, everyone is being dragooned into saying that Ukraine will roll back Russia very soon now. Isn’t going to happen; not because America does not have stuff like ATACMS that could be fatal to the Russian bases in Crimea if given to Ukraine, but because the US does not want to panic the Kremlin into drastic measures of a theatre thermonuclear nature. It is a fine balance and America is not going to fight Russia directly. They just aren’t.

    • Replies: @HA
  378. Sean says:
    @Jack D

    ,I am not so sure that Putin is ready to take that deal YET.

    While it seems likely that Putin was sold a bill of goods by his FSB, underestimated the fight in the Ukrainian nation and and the level of Western support I thinkyou underestimates the level of determination common among Russians to not be faced down by the forces ranged against them. Vad was saying that Ukraine with Western weapons would inevitable defeat Russia and prolly get vindictively nuked.

    The Nato doctrine was when losing conventionally use to theatre thermonuclear weapons, which any Nato supreme commander had to be prepared to do. Back in the 80s the recently retired Gen Rodgers said he’d have asked authorisation for tactically nuking the Soviet advence within hours of hostilities starting. I would not bet on the Russian generals swallowing a conventional defeat any more willingly that Nato ones would have.

    Of course if Gen. Vad is right, it will be a mistake for Russia not to take that deal on the “half a loaf is better than none” principle but it wouldn’t be the first time that a pig headed dictator made a mistake. OTOH, Putin has complete control of the media space inside Russia so if he DID take a deal, Peskov and all the talking heads on Russian TV would be proclaiming that that deal was a glorious victory for Russia and the Russian public would buy it.

    Hmmm I am sure the Russia public is getting a very misleading picture, but so are Westerners because the West wants Ukraine to win and Russia to become completely demoralized. Ukraine is hardly going to give out information that gives comfort to the enemy and makes the Ukrainian-supporting West think its wasting its money. Kofman makes that and many other pertainate points. He talks a lot of sense.

    • Replies: @BB753
  379. BB753 says:
    @Sean

    “Ukraine with Western weapons would inevitable defeat Russia ”
    What? Last year the Ukrainian army was armed with western weapons and trained by NATO and they’ve been defeated twice already, in April and December. Now they’re having a hard time finding fresh soldiers for the last round. Because most of their best soldiers are either dead or wounded.

  380. Anonymous[232] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    They won’t stay in the country; they don’t belong here; they have no permanent residence status & are not citizens.

    Yes, you’ve said already, everything you don’t like is “incompatible with Croatian culture” and will therefore surely leave no mark on the country. I’m sure many a Western European said the same 50 years ago.

    And- foreign laborers in some areas are a characteristic of all modern societies, especially outside of Europe (Israel, Saudi Arabia,…), so hysterical reactions to them are a sign of parochial immaturity & ignorance.

    Israel or Saudi Arabia are highly ethnocentric societies. Croatia is more ethnocentric than places like the UK or France, but not by that much. It will catch up. If you really do live in the middle of nowhere, your perception when it comes to this might be heavily skewed.

    But, this “discussion” is meaningless because: a) most people here don’t know/care what it’s all about, b) you have not given any reasonable argument, just a typical emotional (and bad mannered) rant.

    Emotional and bad-mannered, you say? Talk about projection.

    Of course people don’t care, but they absolutely do know what’s going on, regardless of whether they have any knowledge of Croatia specifically, given that it’s just a blindingly obvious repeat of what’s happened in country after country already. But yes, no point in taking this any further. You stick with whatever helps you sleep at night.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  381. @nebulafox

    You’ve read “The Odd Man Out”

    I have not, my knowledge of Korean War and Sino-Soviet relations are based on works of PRC Sovietologist Shen Zhihua, who based his research on first-hand Chinese and Russian sources,

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-latest-crisis-not-enough-black-women-meteorologists/#comment-5803885

    Stalin’s agenda in the region nicely: i.e, keeping Mao firmly in the Soviet camp as a subordinate

    The US played a key role as well during the Chinese Civil War. George Marshall intervened at a crucial moment that saved Lin Biao from being routed.

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/february-diary-9-items-rumors-of-war-was-macarthur-right-derb-♥-big-pharma-etc/#comment-5859486

    they’d attempt to leave the Soviet camp as soon as Stalin died.

    Not quite. The Russians repaid the PRC with enormous support for a foundation that led to it today leading the world in industrial capacity. Things didn’t sour until the late 50’s

    學習蘇聯先進經驗建設我們的祖國
    Learn from the advanced experience of the Soviet Union to build our Motherland

    • Replies: @nebulafox
  382. Sean says:
    @HA

    Could Tsar Alexander have capitulated to Napoleon? No, Alexander would have been overthrown by his own army. With Hitler, Germans especially the army got a lot more than they’d bargained for, but I don’t think Putin is out of line with mainstream Russian opinion on what is a fighting matter.

    Back in 2008, when George W. Bush fatefully strong-armed European members of NATO into promising future membership for Ukraine and Georgia, Burns was warning that the consequences would be dire—but not because of Putin’s distinctive psychology. In a memo to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Burns wrote, “Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian elite (not just Putin). In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players, from knuckle-draggers in the dark recesses of the Kremlin to Putin’s sharpest liberal critics, I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.” Burns added that it was “hard to overstate the strategic consequences” of offering Ukraine NATO membership, which, he predicted, would “create fertile soil for Russian meddling in Crimea and eastern Ukraine.” As Peter Beinart notes in his newsletter, Burns’s analysis is at odds with the claim (lately made in many Blob communiques, including Applebaum’s) that the Ukraine crisis is largely driven by Putin’s fear of encroaching democracy.

    Zelensky tried to sign a modified version of Minsk agreement in 2019 and was told he’d return from Paris no longer President of Ukraine. Zelensky did what had to do, As did Putin. Oh yes! Putin’s position would be in peril were he to acquiesce in Ukraine becoming a member of Nato. America would be misguided to not try and et Ukraine into Nato and weaken the RusFed. No one is to blame for any of this; conflict can be fruitful and anyway it happens to be the way the world works.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @HA
    , @vinteuil
  383. HA says:
    @Sean

    “everyone is being dragooned into saying that Ukraine will roll back Russia very soon now.”

    Again, this is false-dichotomy balderdash. There’s a vast gulf between “rolling back Russia very soon” and “fighting Russia directly”, and if America chooses a point anywhere in that vast gulf so as to help it to maximize its own long-term prospects (and that of its numerous other allies), so be it. America doesn’t even have to specify that point openly, much as is the case with agreements that America sometimes chooses to enter into without laying out all the details. There’s an advantage to being strategically elliptical and while the various pro-Russia and pro-China trolls evident here profusely praise their masters outside America’s shores who can manage that, they are outraged when America does the same. Hypocrisy doesn’t strengthen your argument.

    • Replies: @EddieSpaghetti
  384. HA says:
    @Sean

    “As did Putin. Oh yes! Putin’s position would be in peril were he to acquiesce in Ukraine becoming a member of Nato.”

    Oh, no! Say it ain’t so. On second thought, it kinda sounds like a plan. Not only can both Russia and Ukraine get back to the business of striving for what much of the rest of the West regards as normal, the Russians get the added benefit of losing the monkey on their collective back that jockeyed them into this mess.

    Your latest batch of copium seems to consist of believing that because the West doesn’t want to enter into WWIII, Russia must ultimately be declared the winner in Ukraine. Again, it’s a dumb false dichotomy. (Moreover, even China has nixed Putin’s insane claims that losing Crimea gives him a pass to drop nukes.) The US has been unwilling to end the planet in a nuclear showdown with Moscow for decades. That didn’t mean the Soviet Union was fated to win anything. Whatever Eisenhower believed back then, it has been Putin that has been grossly underestimating his adversaries’ willingness to stand up to him.

  385. Sean says:

    If you think America is actually going to use nuclear weapons on Russia unless Russia attacks America with nuclear weapons first, then you are living in a fantasy world. While I do not think “Russia must ultimately be declared the winner in Ukraine”, I do believe Ukraine is the loser. The countries that America tries to ‘help’ usually are the ones to pay.

    There was some discussion about the Star Trek episode Mirror Mirror.

    Jack might think Ukraine is like the uber ethical planet of pacifists. But such an argument would have nothing to do with the case. Ukraine did not just leave the Russian orbit, it tried to join a military alliance that is clearly over-against Russia and already has overwhelming advantages in military forces, had added forward antiballistic missile bases to its new members and in 2007 told Russia none of this was its business in the same breath that it invited Ukraine to join.

  386. @HA

    “people know Russia and China and all those supposedly Putin-loving countries are, in the grand scheme of things, existentially lame as far as opportunities go”

    In that case why are the US and UK balance of payments so crappy, and why is every other consumer durable on sale made in China? Why is China where GE make their x-ray machines and Apple their phones, and practically every drone is made?

    “The West” have precisely two manufacturing powerhouses to set against China – Japan and Germany. Maybe South Korea at a pinch.

    And the US have just trashed German manufacturing with the NS2 bombing and their embargo on Russian energy.

    http://www.fingleton.net/the-rise-of-east-asia-and-an-epochal-threat-to-american-freedoms-2/

    All that said, even East Asian corporations hardly emerge unscathed from a global recession. In withstanding the strains, however, they have an important cushion in undervalued home currencies. Put another way, the U.S. dollar has long been massively overvalued. Just how overvalued is suggested when you consider America’s forty-year record of huge trade deficits. How low would the dollar have to go before we might see a real revival in industrial investment in the United States? A reasonable guess is that even a devaluation of as much as 75 or 80 percent would not have an appreciable effect. Yet a revaluation on that scale would imply that total U.S. gross domestic product would at a stroke be cut to less than China’s and even Japan’s. No U.S. Presidential administration is likely to contemplate such a haircut. Meanwhile the big exporting nations — including Germany, as well as China and Japan — will probably for several years to come continue to prop up the dollar as a quid pro quo for continued access to the American market. Remember that these nations’ top priority is not financial but rather industrial and they therefore aspire to continue to hone their production skills. The super-long production runs provided by an open American market are an important help in this regard.

    Let’s briefly consider some other features of the Confucian system. Perhaps the most troublesome from an American point of view is cartels.

    The one thing every American first-year economics student seems to know is that cartels are bad! They not only cheat consumers but featherbed inefficient industrial processes. Or so orthodox American thinkers vociferously proclaim.

    In East Asia the view is different. East Asian cartels are quasi-regulated institutions answerable at all times to the national interest.

    • Replies: @HA
  387. vinteuil says:
    @Sean

    No one is to blame for any of this; conflict can be fruitful and anyway it happens to be the way the world works.

    Wow.

    • Replies: @Sean
  388. nebulafox says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Cool, I’ll check Zhihua out. If you have any other Chinese researchers you’d recommend on this or other topics (read your response to my comment about AI), I’d be glad to hear of it.

    >The US played a key role as well during the Chinese Civil War. George Marshall intervened at a crucial moment that saved Lin Biao from being routed.

    Our role in China long predated that. One of the more interesting things I’ve learned was how the American and British attitudes toward the KMT (and Imperial Japan) fundamentally differed, especially before 1940. Gaps of interest between publicly close allies weren’t an exclusively Communist thing.

    >Not quite. The Russians repaid the PRC with enormous support for a foundation that led to it today leading the world in industrial capacity. Things didn’t sour until the late 50’s.

    I didn’t phrase that right: the alliance and the broad ties it-Big Science being a key legacy-created didn’t end. But there was a permanent distrust of Moscow that was sown by the Korean War in Beijing. Even before the war, it existed because of Stalin’s actions in the Chinese Civil War. What the USSR could give China was too worthwhile for this to take precedence, but it didn’t mean it didn’t exist or that it didn’t have a private impact.

    (It went both ways. Zhou Enlai’s foreign policy announcements about the PRC being open to anything before ultimately signing the deal in early 1950 were immediately recognized by Stalin for what they were: this was in the context of Tito, Berlin, etc. It seems to me that Mao didn’t understand the policy shift this would create in Washington, whereas Stalin fully expected it: his spy network in the US was excellent with the FDR years. It was only with the onset of the Cold War that it truly began to get treated like the threat it was. He probably knew in bits and parts about NSC 68.)

  389. vinteuil says:
    @nebulafox

    Thanks for your reply.

    I wonder if you agree with the infamous Col. Macgregor that China means no harm to us.

  390. @HA

    HA wrote:

    “There’s a vast gulf between “rolling back Russia very soon” and “fighting Russia directly”, and if America chooses a point anywhere in that vast gulf so as to help it to maximize its own long-term prospects (and that of its numerous other allies), so be it.”

    Sorry HA, but from the beginning (see Avril Haines), America has understood that any points in that vast gulf that you mentioned (whether attainable or not) are too dangerous to maximize its own long-term prospects. As such, America will continue to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian. And that last Ukrainian will be nowhere near Crimea.

    • Replies: @HA
  391. @nebulafox

    Good analysis, Nebula. You obviously know a lot about about that 1949-53 era which is so much more complicated than the dumbed down cartoon version that has become conventional wisdom. The cartoon version is that the commies just tried to conquer the world and the U.S. stood up for freedom and saved South Korea and Taiwan.

    In Korea, we could have literally had the troops back by Christmas 1950 and won an unqualified victory if we had just stopped at the 38th Parallel, per the actual U.N. mission. Instead, Macarthur (perhaps the original neocon) had to overreach by trying to drive to the Yalu — an obviously “existential” threat to the Chicoms. 90% of the cost and casualties were post-1950.

    In China, U.S. policy post-1945 was to broker a coalition government in China with the KMT and Communists sharing power. George Marshall went on a mission to China and worked hard to make the deal happen. https://www.britannica.com/event/Marshall-Mission During this period the Russians were pretty diplomatically reasonable and didn’t give nearly as much support to Mao as we gave to Chiang.

    It’s hard to say if such a deal could have ever worked, but Chiang decided to fight it out on the battlefield in a winner-take-all contest. They got forced to retreat to Formosa/Taiwan (which was legally owned by Japan under a 1894 Treaty with , actually, except it unilaterally). And they’ve always claimed down to this day that this was merely a tactical setback and that the CCP controlled Mainland is the illegitimate separatist regime. LOL. The KMT ironically now favors a “unification” deal with the Mainland. And the normal people of Taiwan just want to make a buck doing business with the Mainland.

    Currently, we don’t even recognize Taiwan as an independent country, yet the Deep State wants to have WWIII to protect its “independence.” At the same time, we must have war with Russia because it claimed the right to protect the independence of the separatist Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics — because we don’t recognize them as independent countries. The stupidity and hypocrisy of U.S. policy just makes one’s head hurt.

  392. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “You bums just want our money.”

    Even if all you’re implying by that were true, it wouldn’t be nearly as pathetic as you coming onto a site like this and pretending we should ask permission from our immigrant Arabs and Indians before choosing to help Ukraine. The idiocy of that obviously frustrates you, but like I said, the fanboys are basically willing to grab anything at this point.

    • Replies: @Ennui
  393. HA says:
    @EddieSpaghetti

    “any points in that vast gulf that you mentioned (whether attainable or not) are too dangerous to maximize its own long-term prospects”

    Yeah, sure. You think that’s a valid counter-argument, name-dropping Avril Haines? It isn’t. Your blanket assertions (not to mention the implicit assumption that you possess detailed understanding of what all those intermediary points even are — what, did Avril Haines itemize them for you personally?) are unlikely to convince anyone, in light of all your previous desperate attempts at making your idiocy useful to Moscow.

    It must indeed be very sad for when someone points out that the most vociferous advocate of your position outed himself as little more than a wannabe Chinese agent some time ago, or at least a lowlife traitorous hypocrite who nonetheless insists that America’s interests are first among his list of priorities, but I doubt your razor wit will suffice to slice away that black mark. And nowhere near Crimea, you say? Last I heard, they’re already close enough to be dropping bombs there and sabotaging bridges. Yeah, real convincing.

    • LOL: EddieSpaghetti
  394. HA says:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    “In that case why are the US and UK balance of payments so crappy, and why is every other consumer durable on sale made in China? Why is China where GE make their x-ray machines and Apple their phones, and practically every drone is made?”

    Yawn. Seriously, it’s all about the balance of payments, you say? THAT’S supposed to convince me? That must be why you’re busily packing your bags like PhysicistDave, and unlike him (seeing as he’s admitted to being too dumb and washed up to be able to even hack the language) you’re going to follow through on your convictions and make it all the way to Beijing, am I right? That’s why all those Chinese immigrating to the US have dried up all of a sudden, and indeed, as evidenced by that huge whoosh of a sucking sound, all the Chinatowns in the US are now hemorrhaging a flood of people as their residents flee back to China?

    Yeah, right. How about you go and mansplain all that balance of payments stuff to the few lingering diehards in those Chinatowns so as to make their exodus a clean sweep? See where that gets you.

    I dunno, maybe the Russian zombies who are now besieging Bakhmut are feeling that victory will soon be theirs, but as for their well-wishers on this website, the stink of desperation is as thick as the wet-dog smell of a Husky in a spring shower. If anything, it seems to be getting more pungent.

    • Replies: @Sean
  395. Sean says:
    @HA

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64955537

    “They are learning, they are getting cleverer, and it really freaks me out,” says Dwarf. “They send out a group – five morons taken from prison. They are shot, but the enemy sees where you are, walks around, and you are surrounded from behind.”

    Holm chimes in that Russia is now using drones armed with grenades more effectively. “We used to drop them and freak them out,” he says. “Now they’re dropping drone grenades on our positions.”

    Before the war, Dwarf was an outdoor youth worker and would take youngsters hiking in the Carpathian Mountains on the country’s western edge. Here on Ukraine’s eastern front, that is a far-off memory. He’s been in many battles since then, but the horror of Bakhmut is what lives with him now.

    When I ask about Wagner’s convict army, he pauses to think and says, “I’ll be honest. It’s genius. Cruel, immoral, but effective tactics. It worked out. And it’s still working in Bakhmut.

    Kofman says the real assault groups operate at night.

    Yes they got cut off. Maneuver warfare just doesn’t work any more even for the best equipped elite units . Wagner tactics may look primitive, but they are novel: state of the art.

    • Replies: @HA
  396. Ennui says:
    @HA

    I said Modi in the post you are referring to. Is Modi an American political leader? When last I checked, he led India, and will continue to lead India until such time as he asks his people to sacrifice their recent standard of living gains for the brave fighters of Azov and Kiev.

    Who said anything about immigrants? (nice little evasion on your part, btw)

    The point is the world will tsk, tsk Russia, but other countries are not willing to sacrifice for the Ukraine. So refer to UN statements all you want, it doesn’t matter. Nobody else much cares.

    Sacrifice is something American and European leaders want their people to do.

    • Replies: @HA
  397. Sean says:
    @vinteuil

    https://thegeopolitics.com/mearsheimer-revisited-how-offensive-realisms-founder-is-inconsistent-on-the-ukraine-russia-war/

    First, offensive realism does not possess a set of criteria or another means of making value judgements about where fault lies regarding interstate conflicts. Second, in taking the liberal reasoning for NATO’s expansion into Ukraine at face value, Mearsheimer fails to acknowledge that Western expansion into Ukraine can be sufficiently explained by offensive realist theory, and in fact may even qualify the US as a “good” offensive realist. […]

    Mearshemer is 75 years old; on the other hand he made the point that a”good” state (in his theory), “knows its limitations”.

    The Gulf war of Bush the Younger–in which he did what he father dared not do and overthrow Saddam–seems to have made the world’s only regional hegemon (according to Mearsheimer), forget its hegemony is only regional. The Korean war ended in stalemate even though China was in relative terms immeasurable weaker that RusFed is today.

  398. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “I said Modi in the post you are referring to…Who said anything about immigrants? (nice little evasion…”

    You have the short-term memory of a goldfish. Maybe put the bong away. I was referring to this:

    “To your other point, do you think your average Arab, Indian or African (or Israeli) is willing to sacrifice their standard of living for Ukraine’s ‘freedom’?”

    If you weren’t talking about the Arabs or Indians or Africans clamoring to get into America or Europe, which is what the discussion was about, then it is even more puzzling why America needs to consult them before formulating its foreign policy on Ukraine. Whereas if it were true that they loved Putin as much as you seem to think, or even that “kind of bad” is really as far as they’re willing to admit, then it would be even more reason for dismissing them.

    • Replies: @Ennui
  399. HA says:
    @Sean

    “Wagner tactics may look primitive, but they are novel: state of the art.”

    Suicide guerilla tactics — Kamikaze, Muslim pizza-house bombers — have been tried before. They’re neither novel nor are they state of the art. In particular, the ones next in line to die eventually get wise and recalcitrant, or something like that, and the supply dries up. Whatever “novel and state of the art” technique Putin has tried — bombing infrastructure, shock-and-awe 40-mile convoys, etc., are likewise just throwbacks to a more primitive past that worked for a while, and then for various reasons mysteriously petered out, effectiveness-wise (or else became unsustainable on Russia’s part). Is the power still out in Kyiv? Ask yourself why not? Maybe it’s different this time around, or maybe you’re just high on copium yet again. While the number of criminal’s in Putin’s Russia is undoubtedly large, the number of criminals willing to die for the motherland that knowingly sends them out to do that is finite.

    • Replies: @Sean
  400. Ennui says:
    @HA

    I understand that you are very emotional about this, and it is impacting your ability to handle complex conversations. If you go back through the thread, we were discussing the world reaction including UN condemnations of the Russian invasion.

    I said, fine, but the Global South is not going to do anything beyond that. You got that confused with another exchange between us in the same thread about whether immigrants moving to the US is a vindication of America.

    You are willing to claim world opinion when it supports Ukraine, but dismiss it when it doesn’t serve your rhetorical purposes.

    Like most people around the world who aren’t hysterical Slavs, Nords, German Greens, and suburban Americans or the Taiwanese nationalists, I feel bad for them Ukrainian kids, but I don’t feel bad enough to accept a lower standard of living via inflation and economic disruption.

    • Replies: @HA
  401. HA says:
    @Ennui

    “If you go back through the thread, we were discussing the world reaction including UN condemnations of the Russian invasion.”

    You forgot the part about “revealed preferences” — the key words in the original post which I repeated in my post and you repeated again in your reply — which are manifested specifically by comparing immigration flows. You know, the part where it was specifically mentioned how all those emigrants from countries that supposedly think Putin is only “kind of bad” want to go precisely to the countries where he’s regarded far more accurately and far more harshly. Weird how you would omit that crucial tidbit given that you echoed those words as well. I.e., I don’t see that I was confused about anything, apart from wrongly assuming you were staying on that topic when you were referred to Arabs and Indians — i.e., I thought you meant the many emigrating to the US that you sneered as being crassly opportunistic (as opposed to the tiny few emigrating to Russia or China because of the lack of opportunity there). It was a reasonable assumption to make and just because people choose to stay on topic, as opposed to shifting goalposts exactly the way you want when arguments aren’t going your way, it doesn’t make them “emotional”. You have now clarified that you don’t mean the immigrants, and OK, I guess, but I still say who are we kidding to think that you or the vast majority of the people who peruse this thread give a flip whether the Global South (or even the portion of it that emigrates to the US) of AMLO or Lula thinks nicely of our Ukraine policy? Give me a break.

    For a while the fanboys (and even people like Obama) were arguing we should forget about Ukraine precisely because the Russians will always be more “committed” and “passionate” about what happens in Ukraine than Americans could ever be. Why, then, is not the Russians who are being “emotional” and “hysterical Slavs” when they choose to militarily invade and dismember a country that they could have much more easily and humanely swayed to their side without any of that (i.e. the way they themselves claim that Nuland did)? Same goes for how FInalnd or Sweden or Poland responded? Hysterical? Yeah, right.

    Alas, the fanboys were subsequently revealed to be idiots yet again when it turned out the Ukrainians themselves were even more committed and passionate than the Russians about not being pounded into rubble — wow, what a shocker — thereby blowing to shreds the argument that a pro-Ukrainian coalition will always be outmatched by Russian passion, but again, according to you, the person taking a stand against being bombed to smithereens is just being hysterical and emotional, whereas the forces actually doing the bombing are a-OK, or just “kind of bad”. Seriously? Do I really have to explain this to you? Maybe it’s your own emotional state that make you so obtusely blind with regard to the hysteria emanating from Moscow and its assorted goons eager to start a land-war in Eurasia. Or what about the one where the loss of Crimea — an area of little military importance (given the presence of NATO member Turkey on the opposing coast) which the Russians had done without for several decades with little evident distress — is somehow an “existential threat” to Russia that is worth dropping a nuke over? Now THAT is hysteria in action. Maybe you need to start having a closer look at that, if hysteria and hyper-emotionalism is what concerns you, but we both know your concerns are peculiarly oriented to whatever suits you at the moment, which won’t convince anyone who is paying attention.

    • Replies: @Sean
  402. Sean says:
    @HA

    Suicide guerilla tactics

    The battles seem more like Falluja, with an an army (Ukraine’s) relatively lacking in firepower mounting an urbanised defence that is hard to overcome.

    Maybe it’s different this time around,

    The third wave of Nato expansion was different to the previous two and after several years it became obvious that Ukraine was not changing course, was zig zagging to buy time, and remained adamant on being aligned to the West and eventually joining Nato, whereupon Chapter Five protection would make Kiev invulnerable. Having tried hybrid war and annexation of low hanging fruit majority Russian areas, and finally realising Kiev was not going to be satisfied with effective neutrality a la Minsk, the Kremlin was out of copium by late 2021. Although there were prominent Russia military commentators who publicly and in publications widely read by Russian generals, predicted almost exactly the problems Russia would encounter, the geopolitical situation was dire. Ukraine did not just leave the Kremlin’s orbit, Kiev was trying to join a military alliance that was clearly over-against Russia, already held an overwhelming advantage in military forces, and had added forward antiballistic missile bases to its new members. In one week in 2008, President Bush told Russia that all this was none of this was its business and said he strongly supported Ukraine becoming the newest member of Nato. Supsequent years had seen Ukraine responding to Russian hybrid war by become a far more formidable military force. There was no easy option for Putin in late 2021, especially as he had quite a small professional cadre army to use.

    Koreaafter China sent its army in was a different conflict, one America failed to secure a clear victory in. To explain why, it was said the Chinese used ‘human wave tactics’ but that was a lie. The Ukrainian soldiers speculate that Wagner are high on drugs because they supposedly climb over the rotting corpses of their predecessor comrades to attack over and over again. Ukrainians have no monopoly on courage or patriotism. Both boats rise in the tide of war.

    • Replies: @HA
  403. Sean says:
    @HA

    For a while the fanboys (and even people like Obama) were arguing we should forget about Ukraine precisely because the Russians will always be more “committed” and “passionate” about what happens in Ukraine than Americans could ever be

    You make it sound like the Obama objection was ethereal. Not so. He said the Kremlin had “escalatory dominance”. But then Obama opposed the invasion of Iraq, so he did not share the illusions of so many others in Washington about US power being geographically unbounded, Russia has propinquity; that is a very practical advantage.

    • Replies: @HA
  404. HA says:
    @Sean

    “He said the Kremlin had ‘escalatory dominance’”.

    Ooh, such a big word. So impressive! But even so, that argument’s only hope of any validity derives from the fact that the Ukrainians gave up their nukes, at our encouragement. Without that, the escalatory dominance (i.e. their commitment and passion, however much you want to pretend we’re talking about something else) would be theirs. It’s so convenient of Obama to space out regarding that historical context, but I haven’t smoked anywhere near the amount of weed he has, so some memory issues on his part are to be expected, I suppose.

    And actually, the Ukrainians are more than willing to escalate if the alternative is to lay down and die or cave to the same people who are bombing them, so once you account for them — which Obama and Mearshimer and Greenwald and all the other hucksters rehashing this specious argument have curiously failed to do — the dominance remains theirs. So even this weaselly version of the “Ukrainians don’t exist and shouldn’t be considered” argument fails, due to the simple fact that they evidently do exist and their opinion should indeed matter.

  405. HA says:
    @Sean

    “The battles seem more like Falluja, with an an army (Ukraine’s) relatively lacking in firepower mounting an urbanised defence that is hard to overcome.”

    Well, if the fanboys are a-OK with what the Russians are doing, I’m sure at some point the Ukrainians will purge their own prisons in a similar matter, if that’s the way it has to be, so there’s always that. However, I predict, if that is what happens, that the fanboys won’t find it nearly as praiseworthy as you do. And spare me any more NATO blather — Putin doesn’t get to wail about a problem he, more than anyone else, helped make. Of course the Ukrainians are going to turn to NATO once their territory starts getting swiped. Like I said before, don’t wail to the judge about how he should have mercy on a poor orphan if the only reason you’re in court is because you murdered your parents.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day