The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Systemic Racism
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The theory of systemic racism is like a giant conspiracy theory.

But it’s not a theory, because it’s Science.

It’s Conspiracy Science!

 
Hide 76 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It’s absolutely the biggest conspiracy theory of all time.

    The best part is, it’s actually the current scientific hypothesis for why there are different outcomes between the races! This is how bad the social sciences are in the west. A conspiracy about how white people keep down minorities (except Asians) because they just hate their skin color is the best theory that they can come up with.

    It would be hilarious if it wasn’t for the consequences of policies made from this idea.

  2. What is systemic racism, really? It is the logical result of an absolute denial to accept group-related genetic differences. The logical equation is this: all groups of humans are equal in their abilities and temperaments, humans of groups differ in their outcomes on significant life measures, so some force must be affecting the ability of some groups of humans to translate abilities and temperaments into desirable outcomes on significant life measures. Since that force cannot be genetic, it’s called systemic racism.

    The same principle applies in physics to dark matter. Something is affecting the model, it acts in certain ways, so lets just identify it. The difference between systemic racism and dark matter is that systemic racism has an obvious alternative theory, which is a genetic tendency toward economic capability that is largely correlated with continental ancestry.

    • Replies: @currahee
    @Broski

    Yes, indeed. Well said.

  3. Lol, nice quotable quote. Used to love going to the doctor’s as a boy just to read Reader’s Digest’s “Laughter is the Best Medicine” and “Quotable Quotes” (plus more, wow that was a great magazine.) Yours deserves to go in there and red pill some sick kids.

    Re. Racism, I reckon one can’t go past David Stoveon the subject:

    “Almost everyone unites in declaring “racism” false and detestable. Yet absolutely everyone knows it is true.”

    “But while I see nothing to prevent there being racial antagonism which was entirely rational, I am sure there could not be racial antagonism which depended only on false or irrational beliefs.

    For, suppose there could be. Suppose it could happen, for example, that Race A does not at first hate Race B at all, while B hates A, but only because of false and irrational beliefs which it has about A. Then, unless a fluke or miracle prevents it, B’s hatred of A will issue in treatment of members of A, of a kind which will cause A to hate B too, and rationally hate B at that. This hatred will in turn (flukes and miracles again aside), issue in A’s treating members of B in ways which will cause new, and this time rational, hatred of A among Bs. This new and rational hatred will lead B to treat A in such a way that…But it cannot be necessary to go on: you must by now have recognised where you live.”

  4. Respectable Opinion is full of conspiracy theories. The Holocaust is a conspiracy theory. I’ve read books that all but theorized Hitler communicated with Himmler and Himmler with his subordinates through telepathy. But that’s something regular people accept, and is useful to the ruling class, so it’s okay.

    There’s something, a little, little something, to the negative connotation to the label “conspiracy theory.” Because once you start doubting the Narrative, once you swallow the red pill, you have kicked loose from the earth, with nothing either above or below you but the array of Crazy/Evil Opinion. It’s hard. You can easily fall into actual, not pretend, crazy territory. Because you don’t know what to believe. The divine right of kingship? Okay. The dictatorship of the proletariat? Why not?

    At least with the blue pill you’re spared the effort, and can choose between preselected options. Like a supermarket. Freedom is hard.

    Not to say that the limited range of officially acceptable opinion isn’t crazy. It is.

  5. “Something to do with band-aids. Band-aids are the colour of people who think they are white. This causes black bodies to dindu nuffin’.”

    This is an excerpt from my dissertation “The Intersectionality of Nothing Ever Being My Fault”, which I shall be presenting in the near future.

    • Replies: @Reginald Maplethorp
    @BenKenobi

    Systemic Racism reminds me of The Force from Star Wars.

    As the old wizard said, "The Force is what gives a [liberal] his power. It's an energy field created by all living things--it surrounds us, it penetrates us, it binds the galaxy together."

    I prefer calling Systemic Racism a "sad devotion to that ancient religion" instead of science.

    Replies: @guest

  6. They love the word ‘systemic’. It kinda means: “The racism must be there, we know it must be there because of the outcomes, but we can’t show any actual instances of actual racist behavior because… because…well because it’s SYSTEMIC racism. It’s so systemic that it’s soaked into everything beneath the surface. If you try to look at it directly you can’t see it.”

    • Replies: @JerryC
    @Emblematic

    It's like "dark matter" and "dark energy" in physics. We can't detect it, but it must be there, because if it weren't, our theories would be wrong!

    Replies: @Anonym, @Anonymous

    , @NeonBets
    @Emblematic

    I think a lot of this gets bungled because people don't distinguish between 'racist', and 'racism'.

    The term 'racist' applies to the individual. [And I mean this when the term is used as a pejorative. I note this because a compelling argument can be made that deep down, we are all 'racists'...but that doesn't mean we all hate other races as the pejorative implies.]

    'Racism', on the other hand, applies to a group. By nature, 'racism' is collective...and get ready...it is systemic.

    So...'racism' is really just an organized application of the wishes of 'racists'. If you don't have a coherent, organized, system-oriented applying explicitly 'racist' policy, then you don't have 'racism'.

    It's important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control 'racism'. Society, cannot, however (nor should not because of unintended consequences) take it upon itself to try and control what goes on in the heart of the 'racist'. It-will-not-work.

    It's hard to refute: US Society has actually has done a pretty good job of rooting out racism. The culture has come a long way to address possible racism by ensuring black participation in higher education, government jobs, and public corporations. And this cannot be denied.

    But it's not enough. It's never enough: Now, we're talking about rooting out individual micro-aggressions and moshing it all together as implicit, systemic, institutional** racism. All of which is patently absurd.

    **[When discussing systemic racism, one must never forget to include 'institutional racism' as well. ]

    Replies: @guest, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    , @RonaldB
    @Emblematic

    Systemic racism is precisely like the old concept of ether (aether).

    It's an unmeasurable, hypothesized, all-pervasive, undetectable substance to explain a phenomenon when, actually measured, does not exist (a static universe).

    Replies: @guest

  7. Anonymous [AKA "woops"] says:

    is it true.

  8. When are people going to start asking the most pertinent question of all:

    “What’s so bad about racism in the first place?”

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Bob Smith of Suburbia

    To begin to answer that question, you must first define "racism."

    Replies: @Desiderius

    , @boogerbently
    @Bob Smith of Suburbia

    All races do it, everyone denies it.
    It's like masturbation,
    We either ALL need to quit, or, quit whining about it.

    , @John Derbyshire
    @Bob Smith of Suburbia

    And why isn't it cool?

  9. @Bob Smith of Suburbia
    When are people going to start asking the most pertinent question of all:

    "What's so bad about racism in the first place?"

    Replies: @Opinionator, @boogerbently, @John Derbyshire

    To begin to answer that question, you must first define “racism.”

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Opinionator


    To begin to answer that question, you must first define “racism.”
     
    The definition upon which the consensus against it was built, and the one people of good faith still use, is this:

    "Applying group characteristics to individuals without independent cause."

    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined. Determining who did that undermining and why is the only way out of the fix we're in. Hint: they weren't the wretched of the Earth.

    Replies: @International Jew

  10. Systemic racism is what leftoid heads generally think what intrinsic racial differences, at collective levels [+ macro-environment that reinforce it] is.

    ”Blacks” are not on avg less intelligent, specially to the technologically dominant environment but the victims of the social system that favour unfairly those pale dudes since the slavery. Indeed slavery mutated to the new form of sub-treatment.

    – leftoid narrative.

    leftist narrative is considerably infantilized to the ”blacks”.

    of course (((who))) created this narrative have different goals than pretend, 😉

    I thought increase of technological dominance in the world of work [will] increase the social inequality between ”higher IQ” and ”lower IQ” populations, structural unemployment seems will increase more the socio-racial gap, or not.

    Supposedly the mainstream culture is systemically racist because have favoured and mirrored white people. So, from the ”culture of beauty” to the STEM universities, specially blacks are treated such a sub-citizen.

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Santoculto

    (((who))) created this narrative have different goals than pretend, ;)


    What are their goals?

    Replies: @Santoculto

  11. @Emblematic
    They love the word 'systemic'. It kinda means: "The racism must be there, we know it must be there because of the outcomes, but we can't show any actual instances of actual racist behavior because... because...well because it's SYSTEMIC racism. It's so systemic that it's soaked into everything beneath the surface. If you try to look at it directly you can't see it."

    Replies: @JerryC, @NeonBets, @RonaldB

    It’s like “dark matter” and “dark energy” in physics. We can’t detect it, but it must be there, because if it weren’t, our theories would be wrong!

    • Replies: @Anonym
    @JerryC

    More like the aether theory. A bad scientific theory but the best one they had until superceded. But in actual fact, due to the works of Gould and others, science has actually gone backwards.

    , @Anonymous
    @JerryC

    The black body gives off radiations which the white man can only admire, never imitate.

    The white man cannot grasp the mysterious nature of black people's dark matter.

    And his greatest physicists admit that they cannot solve the three body problem.

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated, the white man, out of fear and trembling at what the black man could achieve, sought to douse that flame with the icy water of oppression, slavery, red-lining and discrimination.

    Replies: @SPMoore8, @CCZ

  12. This is what happens when our elites insist all people and cultures are equal despite being part of a culture in which the monumental impact and achievements of a fairly discrete segment of the planet’s population is all around to contradict that.

    Even Genius T Coates recognized this at one point – some years back (not sure if he was at The Atlantic yet) he had a post in which he admitted one of the hard things about being black was recognizing that his ancestral group’s history is one of basically losing to others that were more advanced, first in Africa and then in America.

    That’s not to say black Americans are not correct when they say they have been poorly treated for most of our country’s history – this is true. However, looking to slavery, redlining, implicit bias and events well in the past as an explanation for why they lag everyone else isn’t a complete answer, either. And it doesn’t apply to latinos or other so-called brown people no matter how hard the left tries to define all of society’s problems as caused by those with less melanin trying to keep down the more vibrant and darker-hued people.

  13. Will our society ever acknowledge the genetic differences? I vacillate on the issue but it would seem eventually the evidence will become overwhelming.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Yak-15

    WNs know that IQ evidence is overwhelming, that success differences stem most from IQ differences, etc, yet they refuse to acknowledge it with Jews or at best, minimize it's importance in favor of etnocentricism (=racism), ZOG (=systemic racism) and every other explanation to delegitimize Jewish success as some conspiracy. On the JQ, WNs suddenly turn to every liberal argument, using slightly different terminology, but which means the same. If WNs won't acknowledge biological differences as the root cause of success when they come out on the wrong side, there's no way in hell any liberals or minorities ever will.

  14. @Emblematic
    They love the word 'systemic'. It kinda means: "The racism must be there, we know it must be there because of the outcomes, but we can't show any actual instances of actual racist behavior because... because...well because it's SYSTEMIC racism. It's so systemic that it's soaked into everything beneath the surface. If you try to look at it directly you can't see it."

    Replies: @JerryC, @NeonBets, @RonaldB

    I think a lot of this gets bungled because people don’t distinguish between ‘racist’, and ‘racism’.

    The term ‘racist’ applies to the individual. [And I mean this when the term is used as a pejorative. I note this because a compelling argument can be made that deep down, we are all ‘racists’…but that doesn’t mean we all hate other races as the pejorative implies.]

    ‘Racism’, on the other hand, applies to a group. By nature, ‘racism’ is collective…and get ready…it is systemic.

    So…’racism’ is really just an organized application of the wishes of ‘racists’. If you don’t have a coherent, organized, system-oriented applying explicitly ‘racist’ policy, then you don’t have ‘racism’.

    It’s important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control ‘racism’. Society, cannot, however (nor should not because of unintended consequences) take it upon itself to try and control what goes on in the heart of the ‘racist’. It-will-not-work.

    It’s hard to refute: US Society has actually has done a pretty good job of rooting out racism. The culture has come a long way to address possible racism by ensuring black participation in higher education, government jobs, and public corporations. And this cannot be denied.

    But it’s not enough. It’s never enough: Now, we’re talking about rooting out individual micro-aggressions and moshing it all together as implicit, systemic, institutional** racism. All of which is patently absurd.

    **[When discussing systemic racism, one must never forget to include ‘institutional racism’ as well. ]

    • Replies: @guest
    @NeonBets

    You're pulling this out of your ass.

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @NeonBets

    "It’s important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control ‘racism’."

    Why?

    If a race of people - as Steve often says - is simply an extended family, and we all acknowledge that we favor our own children over others, why shouldn't we discriminate against other races?

    If we aren't allowed to discriminate against other races, what justification does any people or nation-state have against not allowing any and all other races into their territory? Isn't closing your border discriminating?

    The Japanese discriminate by not allowing immigration. Same with Israel.

    To preserve your people, you need to keep them protected and isolated from other races. That requires discrimination. That requires racism. Whether you close your border (Japan) or form your own towns or neighborhoods (Amish) or demand that your people stick to, hire and marry their own (Jews and Asians at least try), you must discriminate against other races?

    Ending racism means an end to your people over the long run. Races that survive over the centuries discriminate. Good for them. I like my children more than I like yours, and I want my grandchildren to look like me. That's natural and good. Therefore being a racist is natural and good.

  15. How can there be “racism” if there is no such thing as “race”?

    For institutional, structural, and implicit White racism to be true, White men (and why are White women exempt?) would have to first institutionally, structurally, and implicitly create and sustain arbitrary classes of victims so that they can in turn behaviorally disdain, humiliate, and oppress them through overt and covert aggressions and micro-aggressions. That’s asking a lot of the White male subconscious … unless White males have help. Are the “jinns” hard at work again?

    jinn: noun; plural noun: jinns. In Arabian and Muslim mythology, an intelligent spirit of lower rank than the angels, able to appear in human and animal forms and to possess humans.

    Wouldn’t it be easier to just say that “White men are possessed” and leave it at that? Sounds a lot more like African religion than European social science.

  16. @Opinionator
    @Bob Smith of Suburbia

    To begin to answer that question, you must first define "racism."

    Replies: @Desiderius

    To begin to answer that question, you must first define “racism.”

    The definition upon which the consensus against it was built, and the one people of good faith still use, is this:

    “Applying group characteristics to individuals without independent cause.”

    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined. Determining who did that undermining and why is the only way out of the fix we’re in. Hint: they weren’t the wretched of the Earth.

    • Replies: @International Jew
    @Desiderius


    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined.
     

    The new definition of racism is, support for institutions that oppress blacks. From that definition you actually can semiplausibly derive conclusions such as, "affirmative action isn't racist", and, "all whites are racist".

    It is indeed a neat trick, to take a noble cause that, as you say, appeals to our finest traditions, and switch it with a perversion of itself.

    Replies: @Opinionator

  17. Whenever some one suggests that blacks in America are worse off than whites I ask them why pretty much every country in Africa is worse off than every single country in Europe. Leftists go from fact (“blacks are worse off than whites”) to assume a root cause (“blacks are worse than whites due to oppression and discrimination”) without providing anything but anecdotal proof of their claims.

    Their claim does not explain how Asians and Jews can be better off than whites without being caused by discrimination and oppression of whites, and it doesn’t explain why blacks do so poorly even in countries where no whites are around to oppress them. It’s a theory that does not travel, ergo it isn’t science.

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Wilkey

    and it doesn’t explain why blacks do so poorly even in countries where no whites are around to oppress them

    Lingering effects of colonialism?

    Replies: @Yak-15

  18. Racism is a vast implicit conspiracy.

  19. @Emblematic
    They love the word 'systemic'. It kinda means: "The racism must be there, we know it must be there because of the outcomes, but we can't show any actual instances of actual racist behavior because... because...well because it's SYSTEMIC racism. It's so systemic that it's soaked into everything beneath the surface. If you try to look at it directly you can't see it."

    Replies: @JerryC, @NeonBets, @RonaldB

    Systemic racism is precisely like the old concept of ether (aether).

    It’s an unmeasurable, hypothesized, all-pervasive, undetectable substance to explain a phenomenon when, actually measured, does not exist (a static universe).

    • Replies: @guest
    @RonaldB

    The expanding universe doesn't exist based on what we can measure, either.

  20. @Wilkey
    Whenever some one suggests that blacks in America are worse off than whites I ask them why pretty much every country in Africa is worse off than every single country in Europe. Leftists go from fact ("blacks are worse off than whites") to assume a root cause ("blacks are worse than whites due to oppression and discrimination") without providing anything but anecdotal proof of their claims.

    Their claim does not explain how Asians and Jews can be better off than whites without being caused by discrimination and oppression of whites, and it doesn't explain why blacks do so poorly even in countries where no whites are around to oppress them. It's a theory that does not travel, ergo it isn't science.

    Replies: @Opinionator

    and it doesn’t explain why blacks do so poorly even in countries where no whites are around to oppress them

    Lingering effects of colonialism?

    • Replies: @Yak-15
    @Opinionator

    What about the oppression of slavery, forced prostitution and rape by the Imperial Japanese for decades in Korea? Surely this should have set them back a century. Same with the Chinese.

    What about how the Turks enslaved and oppressed Eastern Europeans and Greeks for centuries? Why don't they show the same backwardness?

    That is how I would respond.

  21. @JerryC
    @Emblematic

    It's like "dark matter" and "dark energy" in physics. We can't detect it, but it must be there, because if it weren't, our theories would be wrong!

    Replies: @Anonym, @Anonymous

    More like the aether theory. A bad scientific theory but the best one they had until superceded. But in actual fact, due to the works of Gould and others, science has actually gone backwards.

  22. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @JerryC
    @Emblematic

    It's like "dark matter" and "dark energy" in physics. We can't detect it, but it must be there, because if it weren't, our theories would be wrong!

    Replies: @Anonym, @Anonymous

    The black body gives off radiations which the white man can only admire, never imitate.

    The white man cannot grasp the mysterious nature of black people’s dark matter.

    And his greatest physicists admit that they cannot solve the three body problem.

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated, the white man, out of fear and trembling at what the black man could achieve, sought to douse that flame with the icy water of oppression, slavery, red-lining and discrimination.

    • Replies: @SPMoore8
    @Anonymous

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated .... I also liked the Supremes, but I preferred the Four Tops.

    , @CCZ
    @Anonymous

    Confirmation of your analysis comes from Black Lives Matter (Toronto, Canada) co-founder Yusra K. Ali (aka Yusra Khogali) with the “truth” of blackness.

    Excepted, but not edited, full text at
    https://onsizzle.com/i/yusra-k-ali-edited-whiteness-is-not-humxness-nfact-white-1307096


    whiteness is not humxness.
    infact, white skin sub-human
    all phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness
    they are genetically deficient because
    melanin is directly linked strong bones
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of the nervous system. melanin is directly linked to the strength of senses
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity
    melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it
    in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge
    melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy
    This is why the indegeniety of all humxnity comes from blackness
    we are the first and strongest of all humxns and our genetics are the foundation of all humxnity
    THEREFORE white ppl are recessive genetic defects
    this is factual white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to
    protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce
    themselves
    black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally
    wipe out the white race if we had the power to
    It is why white supremacy as an imperial system thrives
    to control, suppresses and destroy our existence in blackness
    do you ever wonder how black ppl after centuries of colonial
    violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?
    it is because we are superhumxns
     
    See also
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awX_9mC8rX4

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @Hippopotamusdrome

  23. To me the pseudo-science of systemic racism resembles a tautology, one that hangs together with the pseudo-legal concept of disparate impact, thus:

    Where (you think) there is disparate impact, there is systemic racism. Where (you think) there is systemic racism, there is disparate impact.

    All of this is made possible by the tabula rasa postulate, which states that all humans are equivalent blank slates.

    In other words, all differences in human outcomes can be explained by racism.

    Couple this with the fact that schools are now teaching two additional postulates, 1) All white people are racists, and 2) Nobody else is, and then you arrive at the corollary: Everything is white people’s fault.

    Thus the conclusion: All failures of everyone else to achieve as much as white people are disparate impacts caused by systemic racism.

    It’s all one big circle jerk.

    • Replies: @Arclight
    @Buzz Mohawk

    It must really suck to hate the people you want to be.

    , @SPMoore8
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Well, Leibniz argued that everything must have a cause, thus, the Law of Sufficient Reason (although I'm not sure how Darwinism, i.e., the notion of accidental mutation works that).

    Therefore, if there are unequal outcomes, and genetics and/or inheritance cannot be at fault, then I suppose we can articulate the Law of Sufficient Racism, that is, any unequal outcome is due to racism (or MLB's desire to get the Cubs into the World Series, take your pick.)

    It is interesting that people who talk about unequal outcomes and racism, and who deny any influence of genetics or inheritance, are not, at the same time, willing to do away with the most tangible and obvious aspect of inheritance, namely, inheritance in terms of wealth and property.

  24. @Bob Smith of Suburbia
    When are people going to start asking the most pertinent question of all:

    "What's so bad about racism in the first place?"

    Replies: @Opinionator, @boogerbently, @John Derbyshire

    All races do it, everyone denies it.
    It’s like masturbation,
    We either ALL need to quit, or, quit whining about it.

  25. @Buzz Mohawk
    To me the pseudo-science of systemic racism resembles a tautology, one that hangs together with the pseudo-legal concept of disparate impact, thus:

    Where (you think) there is disparate impact, there is systemic racism. Where (you think) there is systemic racism, there is disparate impact.

    All of this is made possible by the tabula rasa postulate, which states that all humans are equivalent blank slates.

    In other words, all differences in human outcomes can be explained by racism.

    Couple this with the fact that schools are now teaching two additional postulates, 1) All white people are racists, and 2) Nobody else is, and then you arrive at the corollary: Everything is white people's fault.

    Thus the conclusion: All failures of everyone else to achieve as much as white people are disparate impacts caused by systemic racism.

    It's all one big circle jerk.

    Replies: @Arclight, @SPMoore8

    It must really suck to hate the people you want to be.

  26. Systemic racism is very much like climate change; it cannot be dis-proven. Whatever happens, the True Believers say, “See!”

  27. @BenKenobi
    "Something to do with band-aids. Band-aids are the colour of people who think they are white. This causes black bodies to dindu nuffin'."

    This is an excerpt from my dissertation "The Intersectionality of Nothing Ever Being My Fault", which I shall be presenting in the near future.

    Replies: @Reginald Maplethorp

    Systemic Racism reminds me of The Force from Star Wars.

    As the old wizard said, “The Force is what gives a [liberal] his power. It’s an energy field created by all living things–it surrounds us, it penetrates us, it binds the galaxy together.”

    I prefer calling Systemic Racism a “sad devotion to that ancient religion” instead of science.

    • Replies: @guest
    @Reginald Maplethorp

    Watch out, that'll get you choked.

  28. @Buzz Mohawk
    To me the pseudo-science of systemic racism resembles a tautology, one that hangs together with the pseudo-legal concept of disparate impact, thus:

    Where (you think) there is disparate impact, there is systemic racism. Where (you think) there is systemic racism, there is disparate impact.

    All of this is made possible by the tabula rasa postulate, which states that all humans are equivalent blank slates.

    In other words, all differences in human outcomes can be explained by racism.

    Couple this with the fact that schools are now teaching two additional postulates, 1) All white people are racists, and 2) Nobody else is, and then you arrive at the corollary: Everything is white people's fault.

    Thus the conclusion: All failures of everyone else to achieve as much as white people are disparate impacts caused by systemic racism.

    It's all one big circle jerk.

    Replies: @Arclight, @SPMoore8

    Well, Leibniz argued that everything must have a cause, thus, the Law of Sufficient Reason (although I’m not sure how Darwinism, i.e., the notion of accidental mutation works that).

    Therefore, if there are unequal outcomes, and genetics and/or inheritance cannot be at fault, then I suppose we can articulate the Law of Sufficient Racism, that is, any unequal outcome is due to racism (or MLB’s desire to get the Cubs into the World Series, take your pick.)

    It is interesting that people who talk about unequal outcomes and racism, and who deny any influence of genetics or inheritance, are not, at the same time, willing to do away with the most tangible and obvious aspect of inheritance, namely, inheritance in terms of wealth and property.

  29. Racism is required because

    Jones cannot just hobble into court, accuse Smith of breaking his leg, and expect to collect damages; he must show that the condition of his leg is due to an action of Smith’s. Compensation theorists must likewise show that whites damaged blacks. As the claim is one of tortuous liability, the showing need meet only the relatively undemanding civil standard of the preponderance of the evidence: it must be more likely than not that white misdeeds opened the attainment gap. But show this the compensation theorist must, which means that a rebuttal need not prove categorically that white misdeeds did not open the gap, merely that it is at least as probable as not that the attainment gap was created by some innocent factor, such as genes.

    But bringing up innocent factors is clear cut racism.

  30. Right now, I’m sitting in a diner, waiting for my lunch. The TV set above my head is tuned to ESPN. (Mercifully, the sound is off.)

    ESPN has suspended all regular programming for marathon coverage of the Josh Brown (a white football player) domestic-abuse situation. (Josh Brown is a white football player – a kicker.) Josh Brown – did I mention that he is white? – is a wife-beater. Josh Brown, a white guy, needs to change his name, because he is not a noble brown man – he is as white as a bedsheet.

    Whites are rapists – look at that drunk swimmer who fingered that smashed girl! Whites are wife-beaters – look at Josh Brown!

    Whites are evil.

    Now they’re showing a jeans commercial. But I’m sure they’ll be all over the Josh Brown situation when they come back.

  31. Invisible racism is such a powerful force it operates backwards through time, retarding negroes in the past who had no idea whites even existed. How else to explain Africa always having been backwards?

    • Replies: @guest
    @C. Van Carter

    "How else to explain Africa always having been backwards?"

    Not when They Wuz Kangz! Learnin' Aristotle logic, an' sheet.

  32. @Reginald Maplethorp
    @BenKenobi

    Systemic Racism reminds me of The Force from Star Wars.

    As the old wizard said, "The Force is what gives a [liberal] his power. It's an energy field created by all living things--it surrounds us, it penetrates us, it binds the galaxy together."

    I prefer calling Systemic Racism a "sad devotion to that ancient religion" instead of science.

    Replies: @guest

    Watch out, that’ll get you choked.

  33. @NeonBets
    @Emblematic

    I think a lot of this gets bungled because people don't distinguish between 'racist', and 'racism'.

    The term 'racist' applies to the individual. [And I mean this when the term is used as a pejorative. I note this because a compelling argument can be made that deep down, we are all 'racists'...but that doesn't mean we all hate other races as the pejorative implies.]

    'Racism', on the other hand, applies to a group. By nature, 'racism' is collective...and get ready...it is systemic.

    So...'racism' is really just an organized application of the wishes of 'racists'. If you don't have a coherent, organized, system-oriented applying explicitly 'racist' policy, then you don't have 'racism'.

    It's important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control 'racism'. Society, cannot, however (nor should not because of unintended consequences) take it upon itself to try and control what goes on in the heart of the 'racist'. It-will-not-work.

    It's hard to refute: US Society has actually has done a pretty good job of rooting out racism. The culture has come a long way to address possible racism by ensuring black participation in higher education, government jobs, and public corporations. And this cannot be denied.

    But it's not enough. It's never enough: Now, we're talking about rooting out individual micro-aggressions and moshing it all together as implicit, systemic, institutional** racism. All of which is patently absurd.

    **[When discussing systemic racism, one must never forget to include 'institutional racism' as well. ]

    Replies: @guest, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    You’re pulling this out of your ass.

  34. @Anonymous
    @JerryC

    The black body gives off radiations which the white man can only admire, never imitate.

    The white man cannot grasp the mysterious nature of black people's dark matter.

    And his greatest physicists admit that they cannot solve the three body problem.

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated, the white man, out of fear and trembling at what the black man could achieve, sought to douse that flame with the icy water of oppression, slavery, red-lining and discrimination.

    Replies: @SPMoore8, @CCZ

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated …. I also liked the Supremes, but I preferred the Four Tops.

  35. @RonaldB
    @Emblematic

    Systemic racism is precisely like the old concept of ether (aether).

    It's an unmeasurable, hypothesized, all-pervasive, undetectable substance to explain a phenomenon when, actually measured, does not exist (a static universe).

    Replies: @guest

    The expanding universe doesn’t exist based on what we can measure, either.

  36. @C. Van Carter
    Invisible racism is such a powerful force it operates backwards through time, retarding negroes in the past who had no idea whites even existed. How else to explain Africa always having been backwards?

    Replies: @guest

    “How else to explain Africa always having been backwards?”

    Not when They Wuz Kangz! Learnin’ Aristotle logic, an’ sheet.

  37. @Santoculto
    Systemic racism is what leftoid heads generally think what intrinsic racial differences, at collective levels [+ macro-environment that reinforce it] is.

    ''Blacks'' are not on avg less intelligent, specially to the technologically dominant environment but the victims of the social system that favour unfairly those pale dudes since the slavery. Indeed slavery mutated to the new form of sub-treatment.

    - leftoid narrative.

    leftist narrative is considerably infantilized to the ''blacks''.

    of course (((who))) created this narrative have different goals than pretend, ;)

    I thought increase of technological dominance in the world of work [will] increase the social inequality between ''higher IQ'' and ''lower IQ'' populations, structural unemployment seems will increase more the socio-racial gap, or not.

    Supposedly the mainstream culture is systemically racist because have favoured and mirrored white people. So, from the ''culture of beauty'' to the STEM universities, specially blacks are treated such a sub-citizen.

    Replies: @Opinionator

    (((who))) created this narrative have different goals than pretend, 😉

    What are their goals?

    • Replies: @Santoculto
    @Opinionator

    And what could be *

    world domination.

    As in the case of parasitic wasp and a species of spider in Central America.

    First the parasitic wasp mentally dominates his victim. From there his victim goes to work for her (left-wing brigade). So when the spider finishes building its web (civilization) and the way the parasitic wasp want, the wasp kills the spider (mass immigration, very low fertility, cultural destruction) and inherits its web (civilization) ...

    the end

    Replies: @Questionator

  38. @Anonymous
    @JerryC

    The black body gives off radiations which the white man can only admire, never imitate.

    The white man cannot grasp the mysterious nature of black people's dark matter.

    And his greatest physicists admit that they cannot solve the three body problem.

    In the past, when three or more black bodies came together and that mysterious radiance which emanates from their dark matter was generated, the white man, out of fear and trembling at what the black man could achieve, sought to douse that flame with the icy water of oppression, slavery, red-lining and discrimination.

    Replies: @SPMoore8, @CCZ

    Confirmation of your analysis comes from Black Lives Matter (Toronto, Canada) co-founder Yusra K. Ali (aka Yusra Khogali) with the “truth” of blackness.

    Excepted, but not edited, full text at
    https://onsizzle.com/i/yusra-k-ali-edited-whiteness-is-not-humxness-nfact-white-1307096

    whiteness is not humxness.
    infact, white skin sub-human
    all phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness
    they are genetically deficient because
    melanin is directly linked strong bones
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of the nervous system. melanin is directly linked to the strength of senses
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity
    melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it
    in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge
    melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy
    This is why the indegeniety of all humxnity comes from blackness
    we are the first and strongest of all humxns and our genetics are the foundation of all humxnity
    THEREFORE white ppl are recessive genetic defects
    this is factual white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to
    protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce
    themselves
    black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally
    wipe out the white race if we had the power to
    It is why white supremacy as an imperial system thrives
    to control, suppresses and destroy our existence in blackness
    do you ever wonder how black ppl after centuries of colonial
    violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?
    it is because we are superhumxns

    See also

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @CCZ

    "centuries of colonial violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?"

    4 million blacks in America in 1860 according to U.S. census, 27.5 million whites.

    39 million blacks today, 224 million whites.

    So, even though a goodly portion of the white population increase is due to immigration, blacks have still outbred whites.

    Hardly evidence of "genocide" or a "system created to make us (negroids) extinct".

    Evidently her light-capturing melanin didn't infuse her with any knowledge of math.

    , @Anonymous
    @CCZ

    "centuries of colonial violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?"

    4 million blacks in America in 1860 according to U.S. census, 27.5 million whites.

    39 million blacks today, 224 million whites.

    So, even though a goodly portion of the white population increase is due to immigration, blacks have still outbred whites.

    Hardly evidence of "genocide" or a "system created to make us (negroids) extinct".

    Evidently her light-capturing melanin didn't infuse her with any knowledge of math.

    , @Hippopotamusdrome
    @CCZ

    Spelling, punctuation and grammar are inventions of colonialism and white supremacy.



    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity

     

    Since melanin is an inherited trait, does this mean she thinks intelligence is heredetary? Will there be a scandal?

    Replies: @Santoculto

  39. Systemic racism isn’t obscure. It’s the societal consequence of statistical discrimination by race, which is rational for an individual has odious externalities. If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled. Is it hard to see why negroes (law-abiding or not) would resent it?

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    Do men resent being incarcerated at 9X the rate of women?

    Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond

    , @International Jew
    @Stephen R. Diamond


    If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled.

     

    Yes, and that would indeed raise a moral dilemma if it were true that cops target blacks in that way. It turns out not to be true, though:
    http://tinyurl.com/heathermac-cops

    Replies: @Opinionator, @Stephen R. Diamond

    , @guest
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    Rationality is racist.

  40. @Bob Smith of Suburbia
    When are people going to start asking the most pertinent question of all:

    "What's so bad about racism in the first place?"

    Replies: @Opinionator, @boogerbently, @John Derbyshire

  41. @Stephen R. Diamond
    Systemic racism isn't obscure. It's the societal consequence of statistical discrimination by race, which is rational for an individual has odious externalities. If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled. Is it hard to see why negroes (law-abiding or not) would resent it?

    Replies: @Opinionator, @International Jew, @guest

    Do men resent being incarcerated at 9X the rate of women?

    • Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond
    @Opinionator

    Interesting point: why aren't men resentful about statistical discrimination against them? Seems the answer would be the same as why men weren't resentful about de jure discrimination against them with the draft.

  42. @Desiderius
    @Opinionator


    To begin to answer that question, you must first define “racism.”
     
    The definition upon which the consensus against it was built, and the one people of good faith still use, is this:

    "Applying group characteristics to individuals without independent cause."

    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined. Determining who did that undermining and why is the only way out of the fix we're in. Hint: they weren't the wretched of the Earth.

    Replies: @International Jew

    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined.

    The new definition of racism is, support for institutions that oppress blacks. From that definition you actually can semiplausibly derive conclusions such as, “affirmative action isn’t racist”, and, “all whites are racist”.

    It is indeed a neat trick, to take a noble cause that, as you say, appeals to our finest traditions, and switch it with a perversion of itself.

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @International Jew


    The new definition of racism is, support for institutions that oppress blacks.
     
    Is there a single institution in the Anglosphere or Europe that oppresses blacks?
  43. The situation is simple. Blacks are inferior.

    But blacks don’t like to think that they are inferior. At one time there was significant racial prejudice against blacks, so now when there no longer is much if any racial prejudice they pretend that it’s still around.

    Slavery used to exist. Jim Crow used to exist. Racism used to exist. Black people like to think well of themselves so they have decided that all of their cultural and civilizational deficits are not their fault. They are the fault somehow of whites.

    Apparently it is like Voodoo. A bad person can make you sick by just wishing evil upon you. Jesse Jackson made a comfortable living for a long time as a kind of witch doctor who would locate the parties responsible for your plight.

    I see that in Liberia only one student out of 20,000 passed the entrance exam. That can only mean that the emanations from the brains of white people must have been particularly strong that day.

  44. @Stephen R. Diamond
    Systemic racism isn't obscure. It's the societal consequence of statistical discrimination by race, which is rational for an individual has odious externalities. If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled. Is it hard to see why negroes (law-abiding or not) would resent it?

    Replies: @Opinionator, @International Jew, @guest

    If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled.

    Yes, and that would indeed raise a moral dilemma if it were true that cops target blacks in that way. It turns out not to be true, though:
    http://tinyurl.com/heathermac-cops

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @International Jew

    Pretty sure that's how stop and frisk works in NYC.

    , @Stephen R. Diamond
    @International Jew

    I can't reach the site your cited: it forbids access because of an ad blocker, even after I turn off all the ones I'm aware of.

    But let me ask you this: why wouldn't cops discriminate in just this way, given that's it's the rational way to fight crime?

    Replies: @Opinionator

  45. @International Jew
    @Desiderius


    As this appealed to several longstanding Western values, it was widely adopted and accepted.

    This definition has however been actively undermined.
     

    The new definition of racism is, support for institutions that oppress blacks. From that definition you actually can semiplausibly derive conclusions such as, "affirmative action isn't racist", and, "all whites are racist".

    It is indeed a neat trick, to take a noble cause that, as you say, appeals to our finest traditions, and switch it with a perversion of itself.

    Replies: @Opinionator

    The new definition of racism is, support for institutions that oppress blacks.

    Is there a single institution in the Anglosphere or Europe that oppresses blacks?

  46. @International Jew
    @Stephen R. Diamond


    If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled.

     

    Yes, and that would indeed raise a moral dilemma if it were true that cops target blacks in that way. It turns out not to be true, though:
    http://tinyurl.com/heathermac-cops

    Replies: @Opinionator, @Stephen R. Diamond

    Pretty sure that’s how stop and frisk works in NYC.

  47. Ironically blank slate theory probably worsens inequality between the races. Take the liberal western desire to include Africa as much as possible in the global economy. Africa can’t possibly compete head on with advanced industrial nations as it has very little to offer other than unprocessed resources and agricultural products, and lacks the human capital to transform those resources into high tech products and services.

    A race realist West would recognise that Africa should be able to protect itself with trade barriers and other nationalistic policies since it is incapable of competing directly with nations with superior human capital.

  48. @NeonBets
    @Emblematic

    I think a lot of this gets bungled because people don't distinguish between 'racist', and 'racism'.

    The term 'racist' applies to the individual. [And I mean this when the term is used as a pejorative. I note this because a compelling argument can be made that deep down, we are all 'racists'...but that doesn't mean we all hate other races as the pejorative implies.]

    'Racism', on the other hand, applies to a group. By nature, 'racism' is collective...and get ready...it is systemic.

    So...'racism' is really just an organized application of the wishes of 'racists'. If you don't have a coherent, organized, system-oriented applying explicitly 'racist' policy, then you don't have 'racism'.

    It's important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control 'racism'. Society, cannot, however (nor should not because of unintended consequences) take it upon itself to try and control what goes on in the heart of the 'racist'. It-will-not-work.

    It's hard to refute: US Society has actually has done a pretty good job of rooting out racism. The culture has come a long way to address possible racism by ensuring black participation in higher education, government jobs, and public corporations. And this cannot be denied.

    But it's not enough. It's never enough: Now, we're talking about rooting out individual micro-aggressions and moshing it all together as implicit, systemic, institutional** racism. All of which is patently absurd.

    **[When discussing systemic racism, one must never forget to include 'institutional racism' as well. ]

    Replies: @guest, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “It’s important and quite useful to distinguish these terms because society can (and should) effectively control ‘racism’.”

    Why?

    If a race of people – as Steve often says – is simply an extended family, and we all acknowledge that we favor our own children over others, why shouldn’t we discriminate against other races?

    If we aren’t allowed to discriminate against other races, what justification does any people or nation-state have against not allowing any and all other races into their territory? Isn’t closing your border discriminating?

    The Japanese discriminate by not allowing immigration. Same with Israel.

    To preserve your people, you need to keep them protected and isolated from other races. That requires discrimination. That requires racism. Whether you close your border (Japan) or form your own towns or neighborhoods (Amish) or demand that your people stick to, hire and marry their own (Jews and Asians at least try), you must discriminate against other races?

    Ending racism means an end to your people over the long run. Races that survive over the centuries discriminate. Good for them. I like my children more than I like yours, and I want my grandchildren to look like me. That’s natural and good. Therefore being a racist is natural and good.

  49. Anonymous [AKA "ABV"] says:
    @Yak-15
    Will our society ever acknowledge the genetic differences? I vacillate on the issue but it would seem eventually the evidence will become overwhelming.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    WNs know that IQ evidence is overwhelming, that success differences stem most from IQ differences, etc, yet they refuse to acknowledge it with Jews or at best, minimize it’s importance in favor of etnocentricism (=racism), ZOG (=systemic racism) and every other explanation to delegitimize Jewish success as some conspiracy. On the JQ, WNs suddenly turn to every liberal argument, using slightly different terminology, but which means the same. If WNs won’t acknowledge biological differences as the root cause of success when they come out on the wrong side, there’s no way in hell any liberals or minorities ever will.

  50. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Yo Imagine dere’s no waaycism
    It’s easy dat da troof
    no bell curve to trouble us
    Above us only da roof
    Imagine all da peoples livin’ like Kanye

    Imagine dere’s no waaycis
    It ain’t hard ta do
    no shoes’ ta kill or die fo’
    an’ no HBD too
    Imagine all da peoples as a global latte, yo

    You may say ah’m uh dreamer
    But ah’m not da only one
    ah hope some day you’ll join us
    an’ da world will be as one

    Imagine no people of pallor
    ah wonder if you can
    no need fo’ hairweaves

    Imagine all da peoples sharing all da world, you

    • LOL: Jim Don Bob
  51. @Broski
    What is systemic racism, really? It is the logical result of an absolute denial to accept group-related genetic differences. The logical equation is this: all groups of humans are equal in their abilities and temperaments, humans of groups differ in their outcomes on significant life measures, so some force must be affecting the ability of some groups of humans to translate abilities and temperaments into desirable outcomes on significant life measures. Since that force cannot be genetic, it's called systemic racism.

    The same principle applies in physics to dark matter. Something is affecting the model, it acts in certain ways, so lets just identify it. The difference between systemic racism and dark matter is that systemic racism has an obvious alternative theory, which is a genetic tendency toward economic capability that is largely correlated with continental ancestry.

    Replies: @currahee

    Yes, indeed. Well said.

  52. @Opinionator
    @Wilkey

    and it doesn’t explain why blacks do so poorly even in countries where no whites are around to oppress them

    Lingering effects of colonialism?

    Replies: @Yak-15

    What about the oppression of slavery, forced prostitution and rape by the Imperial Japanese for decades in Korea? Surely this should have set them back a century. Same with the Chinese.

    What about how the Turks enslaved and oppressed Eastern Europeans and Greeks for centuries? Why don’t they show the same backwardness?

    That is how I would respond.

  53. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @CCZ
    @Anonymous

    Confirmation of your analysis comes from Black Lives Matter (Toronto, Canada) co-founder Yusra K. Ali (aka Yusra Khogali) with the “truth” of blackness.

    Excepted, but not edited, full text at
    https://onsizzle.com/i/yusra-k-ali-edited-whiteness-is-not-humxness-nfact-white-1307096


    whiteness is not humxness.
    infact, white skin sub-human
    all phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness
    they are genetically deficient because
    melanin is directly linked strong bones
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of the nervous system. melanin is directly linked to the strength of senses
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity
    melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it
    in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge
    melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy
    This is why the indegeniety of all humxnity comes from blackness
    we are the first and strongest of all humxns and our genetics are the foundation of all humxnity
    THEREFORE white ppl are recessive genetic defects
    this is factual white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to
    protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce
    themselves
    black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally
    wipe out the white race if we had the power to
    It is why white supremacy as an imperial system thrives
    to control, suppresses and destroy our existence in blackness
    do you ever wonder how black ppl after centuries of colonial
    violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?
    it is because we are superhumxns
     
    See also
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awX_9mC8rX4

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @Hippopotamusdrome

    “centuries of colonial violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?”

    4 million blacks in America in 1860 according to U.S. census, 27.5 million whites.

    39 million blacks today, 224 million whites.

    So, even though a goodly portion of the white population increase is due to immigration, blacks have still outbred whites.

    Hardly evidence of “genocide” or a “system created to make us (negroids) extinct”.

    Evidently her light-capturing melanin didn’t infuse her with any knowledge of math.

  54. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @CCZ
    @Anonymous

    Confirmation of your analysis comes from Black Lives Matter (Toronto, Canada) co-founder Yusra K. Ali (aka Yusra Khogali) with the “truth” of blackness.

    Excepted, but not edited, full text at
    https://onsizzle.com/i/yusra-k-ali-edited-whiteness-is-not-humxness-nfact-white-1307096


    whiteness is not humxness.
    infact, white skin sub-human
    all phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness
    they are genetically deficient because
    melanin is directly linked strong bones
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of the nervous system. melanin is directly linked to the strength of senses
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity
    melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it
    in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge
    melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy
    This is why the indegeniety of all humxnity comes from blackness
    we are the first and strongest of all humxns and our genetics are the foundation of all humxnity
    THEREFORE white ppl are recessive genetic defects
    this is factual white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to
    protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce
    themselves
    black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally
    wipe out the white race if we had the power to
    It is why white supremacy as an imperial system thrives
    to control, suppresses and destroy our existence in blackness
    do you ever wonder how black ppl after centuries of colonial
    violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?
    it is because we are superhumxns
     
    See also
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awX_9mC8rX4

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @Hippopotamusdrome

    “centuries of colonial violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?”

    4 million blacks in America in 1860 according to U.S. census, 27.5 million whites.

    39 million blacks today, 224 million whites.

    So, even though a goodly portion of the white population increase is due to immigration, blacks have still outbred whites.

    Hardly evidence of “genocide” or a “system created to make us (negroids) extinct”.

    Evidently her light-capturing melanin didn’t infuse her with any knowledge of math.

  55. On the one hand, the liberals are right that Western culture is systemically biased toward whites, because Western culture does reward the sorts of behaviors and abilities that are more frequent in white populations. This makes sense, because Western culture evolved along with white populations, and the elements of Western culture that survived were selected for their effect on the prosperity of Western nations. It makes sense that members of other races who find themselves living in Western nations will feel out of place.

    Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites.

    Of course, due to their utter rejection of the scientific worldview, liberals can’t see this in a detached way, and they must imagine that it is some sort of racist conspiracy against blacks.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @a Newsreader

    True. Each race builds a society that reflects its genotype. Humans are not all conditioned by evolution to build prosperous, stable societies and eliminate poverty, disease, etc. They're only conditioned to leave as many descendants as possible. And judged by that basic law of life, Africans are doing just fine, with their ever-growing population. Their reproductive pattern is different from that of whites. Africans have as many offspring as possible with minimal investment in each one (a pattern reflected somewhat in the African diaspora in the US and elsewhwere). Europeans combine small families with careful nurturing. Whites are dwindling in numbers, while they concern themselves with Africa's problems and try to solve them at their own expense. Makes you wonder which race is more stupid.

    Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @a Newsreader

    "Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites."

    Really?

    In fact, it is completely known. There are many African countries and other countries in the Caribbean where blacks dominate. How are they doing?

    Do you think that they simply choose to be less successful, less scientific, less everything? Do they enjoy having less?

    What a stupid comment.

    Replies: @a Newsreader

  56. Systemic Racism is very similar to witchcraft. You can’t really see it being practiced, but it’s definitely out there somewhere. Obviously the moral and social elite don’t practice it, so the practitioners must be those with the least ability to defend themselves.

  57. What about 30-50 yrs ago? It was pretty bad for black people..

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Kaz

    Evidence for that assertion?

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Kaz

    Compared to living in Africa?

  58. @Opinionator
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    Do men resent being incarcerated at 9X the rate of women?

    Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond

    Interesting point: why aren’t men resentful about statistical discrimination against them? Seems the answer would be the same as why men weren’t resentful about de jure discrimination against them with the draft.

  59. @International Jew
    @Stephen R. Diamond


    If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled.

     

    Yes, and that would indeed raise a moral dilemma if it were true that cops target blacks in that way. It turns out not to be true, though:
    http://tinyurl.com/heathermac-cops

    Replies: @Opinionator, @Stephen R. Diamond

    I can’t reach the site your cited: it forbids access because of an ad blocker, even after I turn off all the ones I’m aware of.

    But let me ask you this: why wouldn’t cops discriminate in just this way, given that’s it’s the rational way to fight crime?

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    If it is the rational way to fight crime, why should blacks resent it?

    (Furthermore, if it is the rational way to fight crime, it probably isn't creating marginal negative externalities that aren't more than offset by marginal gains--to the effect that society is better off overall.)

  60. @a Newsreader
    On the one hand, the liberals are right that Western culture is systemically biased toward whites, because Western culture does reward the sorts of behaviors and abilities that are more frequent in white populations. This makes sense, because Western culture evolved along with white populations, and the elements of Western culture that survived were selected for their effect on the prosperity of Western nations. It makes sense that members of other races who find themselves living in Western nations will feel out of place.

    Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites.

    Of course, due to their utter rejection of the scientific worldview, liberals can't see this in a detached way, and they must imagine that it is some sort of racist conspiracy against blacks.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    True. Each race builds a society that reflects its genotype. Humans are not all conditioned by evolution to build prosperous, stable societies and eliminate poverty, disease, etc. They’re only conditioned to leave as many descendants as possible. And judged by that basic law of life, Africans are doing just fine, with their ever-growing population. Their reproductive pattern is different from that of whites. Africans have as many offspring as possible with minimal investment in each one (a pattern reflected somewhat in the African diaspora in the US and elsewhwere). Europeans combine small families with careful nurturing. Whites are dwindling in numbers, while they concern themselves with Africa’s problems and try to solve them at their own expense. Makes you wonder which race is more stupid.

    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Rob McX

    It doesn't make me wonder.

  61. @Kaz
    What about 30-50 yrs ago? It was pretty bad for black people..

    Replies: @Opinionator, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Evidence for that assertion?

  62. @Stephen R. Diamond
    @International Jew

    I can't reach the site your cited: it forbids access because of an ad blocker, even after I turn off all the ones I'm aware of.

    But let me ask you this: why wouldn't cops discriminate in just this way, given that's it's the rational way to fight crime?

    Replies: @Opinionator

    If it is the rational way to fight crime, why should blacks resent it?

    (Furthermore, if it is the rational way to fight crime, it probably isn’t creating marginal negative externalities that aren’t more than offset by marginal gains–to the effect that society is better off overall.)

  63. @Stephen R. Diamond
    Systemic racism isn't obscure. It's the societal consequence of statistical discrimination by race, which is rational for an individual has odious externalities. If the cops discriminate on a rational statistical basis by race, it means a law abiding black person will be apt to get hassled. Is it hard to see why negroes (law-abiding or not) would resent it?

    Replies: @Opinionator, @International Jew, @guest

    Rationality is racist.

  64. @Rob McX
    @a Newsreader

    True. Each race builds a society that reflects its genotype. Humans are not all conditioned by evolution to build prosperous, stable societies and eliminate poverty, disease, etc. They're only conditioned to leave as many descendants as possible. And judged by that basic law of life, Africans are doing just fine, with their ever-growing population. Their reproductive pattern is different from that of whites. Africans have as many offspring as possible with minimal investment in each one (a pattern reflected somewhat in the African diaspora in the US and elsewhwere). Europeans combine small families with careful nurturing. Whites are dwindling in numbers, while they concern themselves with Africa's problems and try to solve them at their own expense. Makes you wonder which race is more stupid.

    Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country

    It doesn’t make me wonder.

  65. @Kaz
    What about 30-50 yrs ago? It was pretty bad for black people..

    Replies: @Opinionator, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Compared to living in Africa?

  66. @a Newsreader
    On the one hand, the liberals are right that Western culture is systemically biased toward whites, because Western culture does reward the sorts of behaviors and abilities that are more frequent in white populations. This makes sense, because Western culture evolved along with white populations, and the elements of Western culture that survived were selected for their effect on the prosperity of Western nations. It makes sense that members of other races who find themselves living in Western nations will feel out of place.

    Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites.

    Of course, due to their utter rejection of the scientific worldview, liberals can't see this in a detached way, and they must imagine that it is some sort of racist conspiracy against blacks.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites.”

    Really?

    In fact, it is completely known. There are many African countries and other countries in the Caribbean where blacks dominate. How are they doing?

    Do you think that they simply choose to be less successful, less scientific, less everything? Do they enjoy having less?

    What a stupid comment.

    • Replies: @a Newsreader
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Well, I do agree with you that it is known. I was trying to be politic*. Perhaps that was inappropriate.

    What's interesting is the case of the Asian nations who have achieved some level of prosperity. They do have different cultural traits than we have in the West, but those traits work well for them. I don't think most white Americans would thrive in, say, a Japanese culture, and Asians living in the US tend to prosper in their own enclaves but are more socially awkward when in the mainstream.

    As for blacks, looking at history the best culture I know of for uplifting blacks was the mid-20th century bourgeois American culture that emphasized strict morality and racial separation. Even then, blacks didn't achieve anything close to what whites achieved, and for some reason this was intolerable to the public.


    Do you think that they simply choose to be less successful, less scientific, less everything? Do they enjoy having less?
     
    Given how blacks vote, one might be forgiven for thinking so. But I don't think choice has anything to do with it. It's all evolution, and you don't get to pick your ancestors or your culture.

    When I think about groups such as blacks living under a new set of cultural traits, it seems obvious that they must be imposed upon the population rather than adopted willingly. And whatever the possibilities are, it also seems obvious that such a process would need to take multiple generations and would have to engender a eugenic effect if it were to have any chance to create a prosperous high-trust society. I don't know what sort of pressures would be necessary for this; evolution, both biological and cultural, is impossible to predict.


    *Give the enemy the proverbial escape route.

  67. “What about 30-50 yrs ago? It was pretty bad for black people..”

    Things were pretty bad for black people in 1986!?!

    How old are you? How did you (learn) history? Movies and TV shows are fiction, which causes confusion. The truth is out there…

    • Replies: @guest
    @anonymous

    In 1986 the White Power Structure used its metaphorical whip hand to force Michael Jackson to perform his minstrelsy, Bill Cosby to amuse us with tacky sweaters, and Magic Johnson to throw a ball into a hoop. What did they get in return? Nothing but millions of dollars, that's what.

    We even pretended Jesse Jackson was a real politician just to snicker behind his back.

    Replies: @Opinionator

  68. @CCZ
    @Anonymous

    Confirmation of your analysis comes from Black Lives Matter (Toronto, Canada) co-founder Yusra K. Ali (aka Yusra Khogali) with the “truth” of blackness.

    Excepted, but not edited, full text at
    https://onsizzle.com/i/yusra-k-ali-edited-whiteness-is-not-humxness-nfact-white-1307096


    whiteness is not humxness.
    infact, white skin sub-human
    all phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness
    they are genetically deficient because
    melanin is directly linked strong bones
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of the nervous system. melanin is directly linked to the strength of senses
    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity
    melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it
    in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge
    melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy
    This is why the indegeniety of all humxnity comes from blackness
    we are the first and strongest of all humxns and our genetics are the foundation of all humxnity
    THEREFORE white ppl are recessive genetic defects
    this is factual white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to
    protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce
    themselves
    black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally
    wipe out the white race if we had the power to
    It is why white supremacy as an imperial system thrives
    to control, suppresses and destroy our existence in blackness
    do you ever wonder how black ppl after centuries of colonial
    violence, genocide and destruction, no matter systems created to make us extinct, now we keep coming back?
    it is because we are superhumxns
     
    See also
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awX_9mC8rX4

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @Hippopotamusdrome

    Spelling, punctuation and grammar are inventions of colonialism and white supremacy.

    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity

    Since melanin is an inherited trait, does this mean she thinks intelligence is heredetary? Will there be a scandal?

    • Replies: @Santoculto
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    How explain dumb whites and smart blacks (of africa)*

  69. All GoodThinkers know to only believe science as it should be, not as it is. You guys need to be more careful, the Ministry of Truth is probably planning to edit your minds. Why, I just love those people and always have.

  70. @anonymous
    "What about 30-50 yrs ago? It was pretty bad for black people.."

    Things were pretty bad for black people in 1986!?!

    How old are you? How did you (learn) history? Movies and TV shows are fiction, which causes confusion. The truth is out there...

    Replies: @guest

    In 1986 the White Power Structure used its metaphorical whip hand to force Michael Jackson to perform his minstrelsy, Bill Cosby to amuse us with tacky sweaters, and Magic Johnson to throw a ball into a hoop. What did they get in return? Nothing but millions of dollars, that’s what.

    We even pretended Jesse Jackson was a real politician just to snicker behind his back.

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    @guest

    Nothing but millions of dollars, that’s what.

    Millions of White dollars.

  71. @guest
    @anonymous

    In 1986 the White Power Structure used its metaphorical whip hand to force Michael Jackson to perform his minstrelsy, Bill Cosby to amuse us with tacky sweaters, and Magic Johnson to throw a ball into a hoop. What did they get in return? Nothing but millions of dollars, that's what.

    We even pretended Jesse Jackson was a real politician just to snicker behind his back.

    Replies: @Opinionator

    Nothing but millions of dollars, that’s what.

    Millions of White dollars.

  72. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @a Newsreader

    "Unfortunately it is unknown if it is possible for there to exist a parallel set of cultural traits that could govern black nations into achieving the same material and social prosperity that Western culture engenders for whites."

    Really?

    In fact, it is completely known. There are many African countries and other countries in the Caribbean where blacks dominate. How are they doing?

    Do you think that they simply choose to be less successful, less scientific, less everything? Do they enjoy having less?

    What a stupid comment.

    Replies: @a Newsreader

    Well, I do agree with you that it is known. I was trying to be politic*. Perhaps that was inappropriate.

    What’s interesting is the case of the Asian nations who have achieved some level of prosperity. They do have different cultural traits than we have in the West, but those traits work well for them. I don’t think most white Americans would thrive in, say, a Japanese culture, and Asians living in the US tend to prosper in their own enclaves but are more socially awkward when in the mainstream.

    As for blacks, looking at history the best culture I know of for uplifting blacks was the mid-20th century bourgeois American culture that emphasized strict morality and racial separation. Even then, blacks didn’t achieve anything close to what whites achieved, and for some reason this was intolerable to the public.

    Do you think that they simply choose to be less successful, less scientific, less everything? Do they enjoy having less?

    Given how blacks vote, one might be forgiven for thinking so. But I don’t think choice has anything to do with it. It’s all evolution, and you don’t get to pick your ancestors or your culture.

    When I think about groups such as blacks living under a new set of cultural traits, it seems obvious that they must be imposed upon the population rather than adopted willingly. And whatever the possibilities are, it also seems obvious that such a process would need to take multiple generations and would have to engender a eugenic effect if it were to have any chance to create a prosperous high-trust society. I don’t know what sort of pressures would be necessary for this; evolution, both biological and cultural, is impossible to predict.

    *Give the enemy the proverbial escape route.

  73. @Opinionator
    @Santoculto

    (((who))) created this narrative have different goals than pretend, ;)


    What are their goals?

    Replies: @Santoculto

    And what could be *

    world domination.

    As in the case of parasitic wasp and a species of spider in Central America.

    First the parasitic wasp mentally dominates his victim. From there his victim goes to work for her (left-wing brigade). So when the spider finishes building its web (civilization) and the way the parasitic wasp want, the wasp kills the spider (mass immigration, very low fertility, cultural destruction) and inherits its web (civilization) …

    the end

    • Replies: @Questionator
    @Santoculto

    Yikes

  74. @Hippopotamusdrome
    @CCZ

    Spelling, punctuation and grammar are inventions of colonialism and white supremacy.



    melanin is directly linked to the strength of neuro systems affecting capacities like intelligence, memory and creativity

     

    Since melanin is an inherited trait, does this mean she thinks intelligence is heredetary? Will there be a scandal?

    Replies: @Santoculto

    How explain dumb whites and smart blacks (of africa)*

  75. @Santoculto
    @Opinionator

    And what could be *

    world domination.

    As in the case of parasitic wasp and a species of spider in Central America.

    First the parasitic wasp mentally dominates his victim. From there his victim goes to work for her (left-wing brigade). So when the spider finishes building its web (civilization) and the way the parasitic wasp want, the wasp kills the spider (mass immigration, very low fertility, cultural destruction) and inherits its web (civilization) ...

    the end

    Replies: @Questionator

    Yikes

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS