From an email from Couch Scientist:
A suggested addition to your bag of tricks.
Surname Privilege Factor
The federal government employs something like 2.7 million people. Many of their jobs and salaries are listed on this website:
https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/
. You can run a surname through the website to get a list of people with that surname and you can then sort by salary. By doing so, you can quickly get a sense of how that surname compares to the average surname. One might call this a “privilege” factor.
For instance, let’s take two surnames. Shapiro (of whom you have written) and Sailer.
Shapiro is one of the more elite Ashkenazi surnames. For example, eight different David Shapiros have Wikipedia pages. While there are many prominent Shapiros, on the other hand, there aren’t that many extremely famous Shapiros (I suspect this is just bad luck.)
Shapiro is a little like Hamilton, the most highbrow of the common British surnames. In the UK, according to economic historian Gregory Clark’s The Son Also Rises, Hamiltons are twice as likely as average to have graduated from Oxford or Cambridge.
Sailer is a pretty run of the mill Germanic surname in the U.S. that is most common in the Dakotas. There are more Sailers in the U.S. than you might think, but Sailers are not particularly prominent.
There are also Seilers and Saylors.
The Shapiro family average is $122,649.02. The average fed by comparison makes $82,709,
There are about 110 federal Shapiros, so the sample size is reasonably adequate.
I would give the Shapiro family a +$40,000 privilege factor (Shapiro average minus Fed average).
On the other hand, Sailers are much fewer in number, at least in working for the Federal Government. There is a small sample size of six, with an average of $65,592.00.
I would give the Sailers a -$17,000 privilege factor.
Take another name. You recently mentioned gubernatorial candidate Pritzker, with whom I am unfamiliar. I ran the name through the website and it only pinged two federal Pritzkers. They were both high earners, with an average of $180,000 in salary. So, that’s a privilege factor +$97,291. Of course the sample size is small.
A sizable fraction of all the Pritzkers in the U.S. are members of the famous Chicago billionaire clan that played a large role in the rise of Barack Obama to the White House. For example, the first time I heard the name “Pritzker” was in the early 1980s from a lady at UCLA business school who had spent a year as a governess in France for a family named Pritzker. Of course, this was not some random Pritzker, but part of the Pritzker clan who owned Hyatt hotels. Of the many Pritzkers I’ve heard of, every single one has been a wealthy Chicago Pritzker.
To use an example from something you have written about Gregory Clark’s research, take the name Percy. Of the 16 Percys, the average is $97,601, a privilege factor of +$14,892.
Percy, such as the Hotspur in Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part 1, is a Norman surname, like Jane Austen’s Mr. Darcy. The Normans conquered England in 1066 and people with French Norman surnames remain over-represented in the betters jobs in Britain today. Some of that is likely due to name-changing, and I’m not sure how true that is in the U.S.
But it remains a prestigious name. For example, when I moved to Chicago in 1982, Charles Percy was the Republican senator. He was mentioned as Presidential Timber from 1968 to 1988.
Meanwhile, the 40 Thatchers have an average pretty close to the Federal employee average: 85,931 or a moderate privilege factor of +$3,222.
In Britain, Thatcher is a fairly downscale surname. In general, if your namesake had a downscale job like thatching roofs when surnames were chosen around 1300, you’re probably a little downscale today. If you had a literate upscale job like clerk (Clark or Palmer), you are likely to be a little upscale today.
How useful is this factor? My guess is that the distribution of a surname among federal salaries is pretty representative of the surname’s economic distribution as a whole. If that’s true, then I think it is pretty useful information in this day and age when we are looking at privilege.
An interesting question is how much correlation is there between upscale surnames in Britain and the U.S. For example, Hamilton is the best educated common surname in Britain and it’s the name of the most expensive ticket Broadway musical of all time in the U.S.
But is Huntington, a fairly rare but overachieving name in the U.S., as upscale in Britain?

RSS

Great post.
What’s the most downscale common Jewish surname? There’s probably less variance there, but it’s worth checking.
Try typing in “Soros”, or one of its early variants, like “Beelzebub “.
Cohen is among the more common Ashkenazi surnames, but it’s not particularly high-achieving by Jewish standards.
I wonder if the Coen Brothers are descendants of some guy who changed the spelling of his name for social climbing reasons, the way my surname descends from some guy named Seiler (ropemaker) who became mayor of a small town in Switzerland and changed the spelling of his name to Sailer for snobbish purposes.
In Britain, Smythes (a snobbish variant of Smith) really are more high achieving than Smiths.
I don’t know if Psmith actually exists or whether P.G. Wodehouse made it up.
Maybe there is a tendency for upscale Smiths to become Smythes. But downwardly mobile Smythes might feel the urge to change to Smith to fit in? This would bed in the surname privilege over time.Replies: @englishmike
---------------- As for high-achieving or low-achieving. Names like 'Cohen' and 'Levi' will not be different from average - as they are found both equally in Middle Eastern and European populations (probably even more common with Middle Eastern demographics).
The physicist Max Tegmark changed his name from Shapiro because there were already so many academic physicists named Shapiro, including at least one Max Shapiro and several M. Shapiros.
“One might call this a ‘privilege’ factor”
One might also call it “strawberry popsicle squeeze farts,” but why?
I’m fairly certain a Lothrop Stoddard would take surname data as evidence of strong germ-plasm (or however he’s put it) associated with the more privileged surnames.
On the other hand, your Current-Year citizen would figure it’s unfair advantage engendered by a socially unjust environment.
It helps to notice that people rise and fall with some independence of the environment.
Not bad, average Shen federal salary comes out to $115,771.72, despite Shen not being a particularly common Chinese surname! Unfortunately though, I doubt this represents any kind of privilege. As I’ve repeatedly been arguing, Asian Americans are actually the most openly discriminated against group in American society today.
I suspect more interesting than just looking at salary is also looking at what fields these people actually work in. Which groups of people in this country are disproportionately engaged in value creating STEM activities?
rolling over in their gravesstill dissipated ashes stuck in an eddy in the Huang He delta.It's the US Feral Government, Mr. Yan or Mr. Shen! What possible useful activities could any of those people on the list be doing?Replies: @AnotherDadWhat the Asian-Americans giveth, the Asian-Americans taketh away on USB flash drives.
Come on, you are a member of a privileged overclass. Your repeated arguing is nothing more than argument bereft of facts, and devoid of reasoning.Replies: @Anonymous
Of course they mostly agitate on behalf of Hmongs , Cambodians and others who’ve been on welfare for generations.
But you should find those organizations.
Commenting on random websites that Asians living in America are discriminated against won’t help your cause. Find and join an Asians living in America Activist group.
E.g., there were two reporters named Shapiro, T. Rees Shapiro of the Washington Post and Jeffrey Epstein Shapiro of the Washington Examiner, who played admirable roles in exposing the Haven Monahan hoax.
On the other hand, there don’t appear to have been any world famous Shapiros. That’s probably just luck.
Are there any black surnames? I thought Toney was black but then a quick image search showed some white faces.Replies: @S. Anonyia, @Jonathan Mason, @Ghost of Bull Moose
There's well-known Israeli mathematician Ilya Shapirohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Piatetski-Shapiro On Russian wikipedia there's a huge list of famous people with the surname. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE--------Although the information is not useful until we know what the number of people with this surname are in the respective countries. Edit - 24,000 people with this surname in the United States.
Or maybe my conception that Shapiro is a high achieving Jewish surname and Cohen is a low ranking one goes back to Nathaniel Weyl’s books. From a review of Weyl:
Let’s also not forget our uh good friend Ben Shapiro, aka The Hebrew Hammer.
Cohen is a name that has a hebrew meaning unlike some of the german yiddish jewish names:
from babynamewizrd.com
The name Smith meaning blacksmith has long been described as the most common among english speaking peoples. The number of present day Smiths cannot correspond to the percentage of actual working blacksmiths in the population at the time surnames were adopted. (how many blacksmiths does a society need?) It may show that blacksmiths were more successful at having numerous descendants.
Similarly the name Fletcher meaning arrow maker while uncommon is still less rare than one would think. How many full time arrow makers (arrowsmiths?) can there have been?
The intersection of linguistics and actual multi-layered meaning of words and names is a fascinating topic.
For example the word safe for a strong box is a seemingly mundane word until you realize that having a safe to store your valuables makes you feel “safe” connecting the two meanings of the word.
More than you might think. During a battle of the Hundred Years War the English army might shoot off ten thousand plus arrows each minute.
An arrow takes a LOT more time to make than a cartridge, especially when made by hand.
Also, it is probable most arrows of the time were made by farmers during the winter slow season. Not necessarily full-time fletchers at all.Replies: @Expletive Deleted
Son-of-John is of course, what the women claim, they could well be son-of-robert.
According to Skeat, "smith" originates in a lost verb meaning "to forge", while "wright" is related to "work". Another form of that word is the adjective "wrought", as in "wrought iron" – which should of course be "smithed iron"!
And "Cohen" is probably cognate with "Khan."
Consider the name ( or is it an honorific title ?) "Aga Kahn."
Smiths are extremely common, but tend not to be world famous. Adam Smith is likely the most famous Smith ever.
Smiths were 1.01% of the US in 1990 and 0.83% in 2010. Adam Smith is probably in the top-100 of famous people from the Anglo-Saxon world--so it's about expected value.
There are currently five Smiths in the House of Representatives and one in the Senate. So 6/535.
I would guess that, statistically, by law of large numbers, every common name will be slightly below average. They're basically average, but get pushed down slightly by those relatively rare surnames that outperform.
But in fact it is perhaps the grandest English name of all, at least once it was transmogrified into "Percy" by the heir to the eponymous estates and, ultimately, the first Duke of Northumberland of the third creation.
And, of course, an illegitimate son of the house gave us the Smithsonian.Replies: @Cortes, @Charles Erwin Wilson
How is Shen your surname, Mr. Yan? Do you write your name with your given name first and family name last like Americans? Frankly, I’m offended by your appropriation of our Western ways! Next thing you know, you’ll be writing about rule-of-law, the Magna Carta, and the Constitution, or even taking tests without making an effort to obtain all the answers first. After that, it’ll be cooking different types of meals for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and then writing with an alphabet that’s shorter than 3,000 characters. For shame! Your ancestors are probably
rolling over in their gravesstill dissipated ashes stuck in an eddy in the Huang He delta.It’s the US Feral Government, Mr. Yan or Mr. Shen! What possible useful activities could any of those people on the list be doing?
Old Yan has even carefully observed our traditions of racial grievance and whining and learned to do it over trivial to non-existence stuff like a Jewish guy.
Seriously old boy, if your kid can't get into Harvard with his test prepped SAT scores and all that violin playing ... bitch to the Jews in charge, not the rest of us.
Yeah, that’s probably statistically inevitable simply on account of how common it is (most common surname in Israel by a significant margin).
Non-Cohen and Levi surnames, though?
How about Cohen and Levy?
https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/index.php?y=2016&n=cohen&l=&a=&o=
btw – 21 Timberlakes working for The Feds – https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/index.php?y=2016&n=TIMBERLAKE&l=&a=&o=
My surname is a place-name, and I am taken to understand ultimately derives from “shelf” in Old English (though I’m not English) and “enclosure.” Which means I don’t know what.
Does it signify high, low, or inbetweeny status? I dunno. If the name were distinguished, I’d probably have heard more about my co-namers. As it is, I’m only familiar with a couple of celebrities with my name. Neither of whom are very accomplished, though one is hot. Or at least used to be.
Up on an escarpment, where they'd cleared out a plot (being remarkably wet and temperate, England was always infested with constantly-encroaching trees, until some bugger invented the iron/steel furnace, and sheep). Also they'd be Saxons, or "Danes" (i.e. weekings), or their ignoble descendants. Not Welsh, Scots, Irish or Flemings.
Backbone of England, and don't you forget it.
Didn’t slaves in the US adopt the family names of their masters? That may skew the statistics…
The last white guys with those names.Replies: @Flip, @ScarletNumber
I'm fairly certain a Lothrop Stoddard would take surname data as evidence of strong germ-plasm (or however he's put it) associated with the more privileged surnames. On the other hand, your Current-Year citizen would figure it's unfair advantage engendered by a socially unjust environment.Replies: @bomag, @AndrewR, @AndrewR
Blasé indifference is not a good argument.
It helps to notice that people rise and fall with some independence of the environment.
Could also be that prominence (as you put it) is negatively correlated with fame.
Don’t forget silversmiths and goldsmiths.
Hephaestus was married to Aphrodite, after all. I’m sure Roissy would have plenty to read into that.
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136%3Abook%3D8%3Acard%3D250Replies: @Light Roast
Considering that their descendants probably got into the gun business, quite a few. By that time names had already been set, so they wouldn’t have become Smiths despite being in effect gunsmiths.
I'm fairly certain a Lothrop Stoddard would take surname data as evidence of strong germ-plasm (or however he's put it) associated with the more privileged surnames. On the other hand, your Current-Year citizen would figure it's unfair advantage engendered by a socially unjust environment.Replies: @bomag, @AndrewR, @AndrewR
Not mutually exclusive things. On average, compared to poorer people, wealthier people likely tend to have genes and customs more conducive to generating and keeping wealth. That doesn’t necessarily mean that many wealthier people don’t benefit from certain practices and systems that give them an unfair advantage. The fact that George W. Bush (who was average, at best, in both intelligence and ambition, and who never would have risen in social class had he been born poor) was elected president […twice…] proves beyond any reasonable doubt that “unfair advantage engendered by a socially unjust environment” is a major factor in the success of many people. The same of course could be said about Barack Obama (via different injustices) and probably Donald Trump too.
I’m going to sound like my surname is Smith (it’s not), but is that really fair?
Smiths were 1.01% of the US in 1990 and 0.83% in 2010. Adam Smith is probably in the top-100 of famous people from the Anglo-Saxon world–so it’s about expected value.
There are currently five Smiths in the House of Representatives and one in the Senate. So 6/535.
I would guess that, statistically, by law of large numbers, every common name will be slightly below average. They’re basically average, but get pushed down slightly by those relatively rare surnames that outperform.
Helen Shapiro, the singer, may not have been world famous but she was very famous in the UK in the early 1960s. She came from a poor family but I would guess that they are rich now.
Are there any black surnames? I thought Toney was black but then a quick image search showed some white faces.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuQlpFnlIBE
I'm fairly certain a Lothrop Stoddard would take surname data as evidence of strong germ-plasm (or however he's put it) associated with the more privileged surnames. On the other hand, your Current-Year citizen would figure it's unfair advantage engendered by a socially unjust environment.Replies: @bomag, @AndrewR, @AndrewR
Upon further reflection, I am forced to conclude that socialists and communists probably tend to be extremely stupid. I can’t think of any explanation besides sheer stupidity for why they haven’t made Paris Hilton their poster girl for everything wrong with our current socioeconomic system, because she basically does embody everything wrong with our society. In an ideal world, given her personal attributes, she would earn her bread through cleaning toilets. Unfortunately, she is very wealthy and famous, and this is 100% due to a combination of being born into a wealthy family and fitting a socially desirable (among a significant portion of the population who inexplicably seek to emulate her) archetype of the attractive, slutty, airhead, blonde mean girl. Any reasonable person would agree that she is the epitome of highly dysfunctional societal priorities and toxic socioeconomic incentive structures, yet leftists are silent about her.
Her parents were actually poor relations.
She made multi millions marketing herself as a dumb blonde and she retired years ago.
She started out with that reality show with Nicole Ritchie. They traveled the country working at minimum wage jobs and meeting ordinary people It was the best reality show ever.
The emphasis was on the places they went and the people they met. It was a tour of America Instead of sneering at flyover country and the deplorables, her show admired the deplorables and flyover country.
All she needed was some seed money from her family for a good PR agency and she was off.
Who knows what she’s really like?
I think that’s part of the point: all advantages are not due to unearned privilege, If Smiths make more than Jeffersons it might be earned not a sign of unfairness.
They want you to think "unearned privilege" when you hear "privilege," which is a dirty trick. Much like with "racism,"--which combines the desire to throw all members of a despised race into gas chambers with innocuously noticing people of a certain color are better at basketball--it's a slippery term. You can't pin them down.Replies: @scrivener3
At Wikipedia you can find some other reasons for the large number of present-day Smiths. For example, the name was often given to African-American slaves who retained it after emancipation and it was sometimes adopted by native Americans.
Senator Percy was also the father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller IV. Now that’s a prestigious name.
Helen Shapiro was sort of a British Brenda Lee in the early sixties:
Shapiro, Pritzker…
Am I the only one with a SERIOUS case of Hebrew fatigue?!
The Normans did not conquer Britain in 1066, it was just England.
But you have raised an important HBD point about the Percy family, though maybe you were unaware. The best way I can illustrate the point is to contrast them with the Campbell family. The head of the clan is the Duke of Argyll. From the C14th onwards, they expanded rapidly. Some of the clan were blood relative of the Duke, but as they expanded they absorbed clansfolk from other clans, who adopted the name Campbell. By the C17th the latter formed the overwhelming majority of the clan. By this time Campbell was a very common name. Add to that, there are Irish Campbells who have no connection to Scots Campbells whatsoever. Rather like the Scots and Irish Kennedys ( Kennedy is a much more common name in Scotland )
By contrast, the Percy have always been a small Northumbrian clan. The head of the clan was and is the Duke of Northumberland. The Campbells basically tried to take over most of Argyll ( not good if you were a MacDonald ) whereas the Percys remained in the Alnwick-Warkworth area and left the other clans ( Heron, Collingwood, Cuthbert etc ) in place. I suspect that nearly all those born with the Percy surname are related to each other from the Middle Ages onwards. They are not numerous, but I have never met a poor one. They all seem to have affluent lifestyles. Indeed, one of them was even the Councillor of the Ward I lived in. As well as that, they all seemed to have similar discreet, well-mannered characteristics – not what you would expect from relatives of Harry Hotspur.
The differences between” Mass Clans” and small, apparently related clans are often quite sharp. The former ( eg Campbells, MacDonalds etc ) have expanded by agglomeration. Comparatively few are related to each other or the main branch of the clan. They are a mixed bag of humanity.
Small clans seem often to be formed of related persons. This is particularly noticeable with small, aristocratic clans like the Percys. Another example are the Mars, Marrs or Erskines. All three surnames are associated with the Earldom of Mar ( the World’s oldest title ). Nearly all persons of these surnames are surmised to be related. As I said about the Percys, I’ve never met a poor one. And that goes for the ones who changed their names as well – like The Smiths’ Johnny Marr, who changed his name from ( low class Irish ) Maher to ( aristocratic Scots ) Marr. Instant Surname Privilege !
I agree about the Percys - I too have never met a poor one.
I do happen to know, on the other, that a family of lower class Erskines live, not only in Scotland, but actually in Alloa, the site of the historic seat of the Earls of Mar.
Servants who took the name, or perhaps an illegitimate branch? In any case, they are always courteously treated by the head of the family.Replies: @Ivy, @Verymuchalive
always thought that was an odd name but more fool I
I remain to be corrected, basically because the northern barbarians are of little consequence, and much of a muchness.
Try Gascoigne or, I dunno, Musgrave, Dacre or Clifford, they're of a similar vintage and locality, and the descents should map out similarly (relentless gentry interbreeding). Interesting experiment. Do brits fuck about carelessly with their surnames like foreigners do? Inalienable surnames only became a thing apres les Normands, mainly for tax reasons. Only yDNA will provide the answers, I suspect.Replies: @Alden
One peculiarity is the popularity of Miller among people of British descent. In Medieval Britain millers were rather unpopular, with a reputation for price-gouging farmers, so one would imagine that few of them used that surname.
A likely explanation is that most Millers are Anglicized from Muller, grain millers not having been as unpopular in the German-speaking world.
I beg to differ!! I believe the most famous would be Anna Nicole Smith!
All this brings to mind the rather bizarre (at least to a Westerner) high frequency of certain Asian names, in their country of origin like Nguyen in Vietnam, or Kim in Korea, or to a lesser extent, Wang in China. All countries with a history of Confucianism and communism.
It may be just a coincidence based the single character writing system, but it seems to me that having fewer unique names would help with any ostensibly social-minded philosophy. People may also be a tiny bit more willing to go along with Communism, if they don’t have a uniquely bourgeois name.
Tinsmith, locksmith, coppersmith, pewtersmith, gunsmith…
How many full time arrow makers (arrowsmiths?) can there have been?
More than you might think. During a battle of the Hundred Years War the English army might shoot off ten thousand plus arrows each minute.
An arrow takes a LOT more time to make than a cartridge, especially when made by hand.
Also, it is probable most arrows of the time were made by farmers during the winter slow season. Not necessarily full-time fletchers at all.
Just be assured that it was a major trade, on a level with masons or carters. And if it weren't for them, c'est certain que je vous addresserez-ez-ez en francais (or whatever their monkey-gibber is, correctly).Replies: @Logan
I dunno: Mark E. Smith of The Fall, Anna Nicole Smith, The Smiths, uh… Aerosmith,…
The Percy’s were a wealthy family where I grew up, the most prominent being the novelist Walker Percy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Alexander_PercyReplies: @yaqub the mad scientist
I have a privileged sounding name (it has a walk-on part in the life of Shakespeare) but my people take a $7,000 hit compared to the $83,000 Federal Govt average.
Won’t a lot of ethic sounding names be concentrated on the coasts where salaries are higher, so that old stock folks with assets look relatively less privileged?
When I map the office locations of federal employees with my last name, they are conspicuously fly-over types.
But come to think of it, there’s a lot of brawlers with my name when I search for it.
My surname is pretty uncommon and sounds fancy to people, although a certain number of its bearers are black. For example, I suspect that the federal employee who has my last name and the first name Theodoshia may well not be White Like Me.
Anyway, the database also shows 110 federal employees who have my surname, which I find shockingly high. In a half-century of consciousness, I’ve never randomly run across a single person with my surname, even with one of its several variant spellings. But I’ve met several Shapiros, who are represented in that database at the same rate.
I’m way too lazy to average these people’s salaries, by the way: maybe I should be working for the federal government.
There are a LOT of federal employees.
There are many variations on Smith, including the German version Schmidt, Russian Kuznetsov, French Lebrun, Spanish Herrera, Italian Ferrero.
A German variant would be Eisenhower, a hewer of iron. A Messerschmitt would be a maker of knives.
At the most simple level Hamilton is a town in Scotland and Huntingdon is a town in England. Education in Scotland is often believed to be better than in England.
However it is much more complicated that that. The Earls of Arran in Scotland have the family name Hamilton, and title of Earls of Huntingdon was created several times, but appears not to be associated with the town, which is best known as the birthplace of Oliver Cromwell and Samuel Pepys.
So people who have the names might be associated with the aristocratic families, or just named after the towns.
Further complicating factor is that Hamilton was the name of a hamlet in England, and the local family established itself in Scotland then founded a place named after the family. So this is rather like the pattern of arrival in the US giving places names that reminded them of home.
Huntingdon,near Cambridge, is not very far from Boston, which I believe has a place in New England named after it that has a suburb named Cambridge, even though there is no River Cam in Boston, Mass.
Hamilton in Scotland has a soccer team with the marvelous tongue twister name Hamilton Academicals.
https://www.hamiltonacciesfc.co.uk/
Hamilton is the most distinguished aristocratic name in Scotland - two dukedoms, two earldoms, a viscountcy, two baronies, three baronetcies, and four families of the landed gentry; all this without counting the extinct titles.
I would wager then that something like 90% of the Oxford and Cambridge graduates bearing this name were scions of one or another of these families.Replies: @Alden
Miss Shapiro is not well known either.
There are about 100 notable Shapiro’s.
Wouldn’t black people throw a monkey (no pun intended) wrench into this analysis. American blacks often took the names of their plantation owners or even founding fathers. (Indeed, I mentioned to my daughter the other day that I’d never met a white person with the last name of Washington or Jefferson, but I’ve seen plenty of blacks with those surnames.)
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.
Though, it’s interesting. My (white) wife’s maiden name was Davis. If she wore something with her surname on it she often received odd looks or even comments that, “Her daddy must be black.” Funny how it works. Most Davises I had met up to that point were white - squarely middle class white.Replies: @Ripple Earthdevil, @prosa123
What did George Washington and Thomas Jefferson have in common?
They were the last white people to have these names.Replies: @Indiana Jack
The Percys have been Dukes or Earls of Northumberland since 1403 , and were and are some of the biggest landholders in England. They still make lists of the top twenty wealthy British families. One of them was a British army commander in the American War of Independence.
This database illustrates the fact that while working for the federal government has its advantages, one big downside is that your salary is a matter of public record. That’s something you’d never see in the private sector.
He made it up. Riffing on Greek words pronounced with silent P in English: pseudo, pneumonia, psoriasis.
Steve,
did you ever square dance? Maybe your kids learned square dancing in school. Like many other Americans of your vintage, you may be part of an unwitting experiment.
https://qz.com/1153516/americas-wholesome-square-dancing-tradition-is-a-tool-of-white-supremacy/
Henry Ford, by the way, was influential and did promote Americana for partially racist reasons. He was also never part of the Establishment, though his foundation was. The Establishment made fun of him, including in a rather embarrassing visit to the witness stand. If educrats were pushing square dancing instruction in the 70s and 80s, rest assured it was NOT because of Ford.
Why did they, then? Well, our school system feeds the fire under the melting pot. They love synthetic culture, including propping up dead culture. Persistent popular dance forms don't need to be taught in school. You can go somewhere to learn the fox-trot, Charleston, swing, and other forms associated with jazz. You can also go learn to waltz and polka, two white dance forms that don't get taught in school.
Square dancing and line dancing may be taught in barns and honky-tonks in certain parts of the country. I wouldn't know. But most people will never encounter them in real life. Not counting that one line routine people do at wedding receptions. So there's a purpose to teaching them in school.
I'm one of those weirdos who doesn't necessarily hold malign origins* against something, if it's valuable. Which may or may not be the case with square dancing. But the simple fact that it was promoted due to racism doesn't have to be no thang. So was birth control, among other things in which good Current Year citizens believe.
By the way, I like a lot of jazz, but I'm not crazy about the style of dance associated with it. I watch Jane Austen costume dramas sometimes and wonder, "Why don't we do that instead of gyrating like the possessed?"
*Not that preserving white culture for the sake of whiteness is a bad thing.Replies: @Anonymous, @Intelligent Dasein
In junior high (in Boston) there were twins with the surname B’Smith, written exactly like that.
Not a bad voice for age 14.
Sort of related: if you speak a bunch of languages, you’ll realize that the tendency for poor people to give their children whacky names is universal. Must have something to do with magical thinking and the belief in the power of a sound.
Regarding Huntingdon, I should perhaps have added that in 1601 a man called Munday wrote a play about Robin Hood in which it is claimed that Hood was the Earl of Huntingdon.
This was probably an attempt to give a social upgrade to the renowned socialist who robbed from the rich and gave to the poor, a quaint notion that predates the modern tendency to reverse the process.
The current Earl of Huntingdon is William Edward Robin Hood Hastings-Bass, 17th Earl of Huntingdon, who came from a family of wealthy racehorse trainers and trained horses for the Queen. Since his retirement he has taken part in charity work, driving a truckload of supplies to Bosnia and taking part in bike ride across Borneo and a safari in the Australian outback.
The claim that Robin was Earl of Huntingdon, or received the title from Richard the Lionhearted upon the latter's return from his crusade, is of course false. The earldom was held during all of this period by Henry, brother of William the Lion of Scotland. It had been one of the Scottish royal family's possessions in England intermittently throughout the twelfth century.
There is often a bit of genuine but garbled history buried in legends. Thus, for example, the Siegfried and Brunnhilde of the Nibelungenlied probably reflect the Merovingian Sigebert and his wife, the Visigothic princess Brunehaut. If we are to look for some historical events in the background to the Robin Hood legend, they might have arisen after the accession of John as King of England and in the period of rebellion before Magna Carta was forced upon the King by his barons.
In 1209, John compelled William the Lion, King of Scots and ci-devant Earl of Huntingdon, elder brother of the then incumbent Earl, to give two of his daughters in marriage to English barons. One of these barons was Robert de Ros, Baron of Helmsley. De Ros later joined the rebellion against John and was one of the Magna Carta sureties.
Robin was a common nickname for Robert - could the rebellious Robert de Ros, married to a Scottish royal who was niece of the Earl of Huntingdon, be the origin of the legend that Robin Hood was Earl of Huntingdon?
Robert Shapiro (OJ’s lawyer)? Ben Shapiro?
The Scottish Hamiltons are the highest ranking peers in Scotland, and are, to the very best of my knowledge, the only noble family of British aborigine origin. The male line carries the I2a “Isles” haplogroup, interesting to me only because I am also of the same haplogroup. Most nobles in Britain, and indeed all over Europe, are one form of Indo-European line or another.
“Haplogroup I is the oldest major haplogroup in Europe and in all probability the only one that originated there (apart from very minor haplogroups like C1a2 and deep subclades of other haplogroups).” From Eupedia.com.
I2a was the haplogroup of the first modern humans to inhabit the British Isles. They were overwhelmed near to the point of extinction by the Indo-Europeans.
I think the most famous Shapiro is Robert.
Never really noticed many ‘Huntington’s’ in the UK.
Probably derives from ‘Huntingdon’ the name of a town and former (very small) county in East Anglia.
Apparently, although virtually all Hamiltons are of Scottish provenance, the name is actually of English origin. It is, (or so it is said), apparently derived from a suburb of midland city of Leicester of the same name.
Some noble or another took it to Scotland back in the day.
Surprisingly, the very Scottish surname ‘Graham’ is also of English derivation, being derived from the town of Grantham, Lincolnshire, which happens, of course, to be Maggie Thatcher’s hometown.
Blacksmithing in England and the US was traditionally represented in as a virile trade (on the contrary, tailoring was represented as unmanly in tunes like “The Devil Among The Tailors” (like ‘cat among the pigeons’) and songs like I’ll Go And List For A Sailor). You certainly needed (or developed) strong arms.
And coppersmiths.
All New Jersey public employees, whether local, county, or state, have their salaries as part of the public record.
It would be hard to think of more famous surnames than those of American mafioso or Italian artists but I am not aware if Italian names bear any relation to social status/origins. Any Italians know?
As a very general rule Italian names that end in -i tend to be northern, and higher social status than names that end in -o,-a, -e which are southern. So Rossi, Bianchi, Ferrari are generally higher achieving than Russo, Ferraro or De Rosa.
Also - Agnelli, Prodi, Visconti, Rossellini and Renzi are better names than Bonanno, Colombo, Gambino, Genovese und Lucchese.Replies: @syonredux
Interesting that half the privilege of Shapiros working for the feds is attributable to the 12% of them that are medical officers in HHS or the VA. The latter pays way more, by the way, but I’d guess that neither offers relatively prestigious gigs as far as medicine goes.
For what it's worth, my guess is that the doctors Shapiro have thought very hard about and maximized their career choices. Considering things like loan forgiveness and other benefits, these gigs are probably pretty good deals for them even if not particularly prestigious.
But that's really an aside. This is just a comparison of federal employees and Shapiros in the federal government are clearly outperforming the average fed.
my Great Great Grandfather was a Blacksmith in Pennsylvania, but his surname was McCormick…he was Scots-Irish and was a veteran of the civil war…..his wife was a direct descendant of John Morton (a signer of the Declaration)
The problem with surname analysis is marriage, remember Margret the grocer’s daughter was a Roberts and only married into the thatcher name, though I believe denis was a pretty high up in the chem co she worked at after getting her degree. And Roberts is in be of those names that are largely class independant , although higher up than my surname based on a nickname of a community n man indicate a lower class origini
I have one read that in Germany still up today people called “Schmidt” (in english Blacksmith) are on average heavier than people called Schneider (tailor).
Interesting. A small quibble: since the average federal Sailer salary is about $17K below the overall average, -$17K should be termed the “privilege offset,” not “privilege factor” (a “factor” being a number by which something is multiplied). Alternatively, since $17K is about 20% of $83K, you could assign to Sailer a privilege factor of 0.80.
I put in my surname, which is common among Tamil Brahmins, got 9 hits
Average = $158 K
Min = 99 k
Max = 206 k
Sharma: 133K (count 171), US + 50K
Varma/Verma: 133K (65), US + 50K
Gupta: 212K (129), US + 129K
Das*: 130K (77), US + 47KReplies: @rec1man
I ran it for the surname Kelly and got 1084 results. Seven of those had a $0 salary, which I excluded. Average Kelly salary is $87,482.56.
For what it’s worth, 5 Kellys work for the Tennessee Valley Authority, but no Shapiros do.
“For example, Hamilton is the best educated common surname in Britain and it’s the name of the most expensive ticket Broadway musical of all time in the U.S.”
And it’s also the name of Judge Reinhold’s character in Fast Times at Ridgemont High.
The 12% is staggering. A more nuanced formula could probably factor things like that in.
For what it’s worth, my guess is that the doctors Shapiro have thought very hard about and maximized their career choices. Considering things like loan forgiveness and other benefits, these gigs are probably pretty good deals for them even if not particularly prestigious.
But that’s really an aside. This is just a comparison of federal employees and Shapiros in the federal government are clearly outperforming the average fed.
Are there any black surnames? I thought Toney was black but then a quick image search showed some white faces.Replies: @S. Anonyia, @Jonathan Mason, @Ghost of Bull Moose
Washington, Jefferson, Jackson are almost exclusively black surnames in the U.S. As are Montgomery and Williams, but a little less so.
Choudhury does pretty well thanks to the doctors employed at the VA. It means landlord\head of community etc. and is used by both Hindus and Muslims in the Indian sub-continent.
Isn’t that ‘Smythe’ rather than ‘Smythes’?
Maybe there is a tendency for upscale Smiths to become Smythes. But downwardly mobile Smythes might feel the urge to change to Smith to fit in? This would bed in the surname privilege over time.
Shapiro is also the name of the family that owned Familian Pipe & Supply from 1962 to 1987. Familian was a well-known plumbing wholesaler in California, Nevada, and Hawaii.
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
In the US, has there been white flight from those surnames?
I have a basic, working knowledge of German but admittedly didn’t know that the word for “rope” is “seil” (pr. “zile”). So… “Der Seiler” would indeed translate to “ropemaker”.
Which proves an old adage to be true–you DO learn something new every day.
Tschuss!!
His uncle William was probably more representative of that branch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Alexander_Percy
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/more-cowbell-with-will-ferrell-on-snl-video-saturday-night-live-nbc/3506001?snl=1
You can do a similar thing with contributors to presidential candidates. I think it works out that Jews provide 60% of the funding for democrats for instance.
I can’t find the info for 2016, but the idea is to search for surnames – Levy, Smith, Sanchez etc. Then see how much they’ve contributed in total, for each party. Then search database for how many of the population has the surname to work out roughly what ethnic group controls the party. Jews dominate, Whites are middle ranking, and Hispanics don’t give much at all. Black are hard to separate, because of the similar surname to Whites.
So true: an obvious, but very important, mathematical fact! I guess the family name effect as to rely, heavily, on the right kind of assortative mating.
“Cohen” and variants denote membership in ancient Judaism’s priestly caste (similar to Brahmins), who (historically and in Orthodox Judaism) are also outright forbidden to marry gentiles, converts or half-Jews, so if it isn’t a particularly prestigious surname it would seem to contradict both the thesis of this post and HBD explanations for Ashkenazi achievement.
However, grinding through the centuries what's really going to be selective is economic performance. Do you want to marry your really hot/healthy/fertile daughter to the rabbi's boy, or the son of the successfully banker or grain trader? All else even close to equal, my daughter's going with B.
It's actually the economic benefit of IQ that will drive selection--better survival of children, and ergo better mates to have children with.
The Jewish community can through monetary support and bestowing social status drive up the relative standing of the rabbi and appeal of the young rabbis as marriage partners. But it's hard for it to be at the very top in a community that is doing so well in intellectually demanding professions. And then the real breakout of the Jewish community in the last couple hundred years was when they realized the goyim had actually shot by them in intellectual development while they were treading water in their little closed backwater. The folks/families leading the charge to engage with European intellectual developments, were not the rabbinate.Replies: @syonredux, @kaganovitch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Alexander_PercyReplies: @yaqub the mad scientist
My great uncle roomed with him at Sewanee. Lanterns on the Levee is a good book.
Of course, she was cheating on him with Ares….
Odyssey, Book 8
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136%3Abook%3D8%3Acard%3D250
"Haplogroup I is the oldest major haplogroup in Europe and in all probability the only one that originated there (apart from very minor haplogroups like C1a2 and deep subclades of other haplogroups)." From Eupedia.com.
I2a was the haplogroup of the first modern humans to inhabit the British Isles. They were overwhelmed near to the point of extinction by the Indo-Europeans.Replies: @Beckow
Hamiltons might be descended from a lonely aborigine elite member who joined the invading Indo-Europeans (we could also say he betrayed his native people).
Male ‘I’ groups in Europe are the indigenous population. They are most numerous in places where European native population found shelter during Ice Age. Then they expanded back up north. Europe looked suddenly very attractive after the Ice Age ended, and the ‘I’ natives were over-run by waves of Indo-Europeans, Anatolians, farmers and sheep-herders from Middle East, etc…
Interestingly enough the ‘I’ DNA groups is closer to the Middle-Eastern ‘J’ DNA groups than to the Indo-European ‘R1a-b’ groups.
Anther oddity is the large percentage of royal-aristocrat male DNA that has tested as a group ‘G’. (E.g. Capetians, Bavarian royals, bones of dead warriors, Otzi was also a ‘G’, etc…). G is a rare group in Europe (or world-wide), but it has a strong cluster in the Caucasus mountains, where Ossetians are majority G. People with male G DNA are heavily associated with spread of highland pastoral lifestyle, and with spread of metallurgy. Possibly some combination of bronze/iron weapons, horses, and high mobility made them into an ancient source of many high-born families. Too bad we don’t have any surnames that would be associated with them (or Capetians?).
‘Cohen’ and ‘Levi’ are specially protected names in Israel.
It’s illegal to change your name to ‘Cohen’ or ‘Levi’ in Israel. (There may be a couple of other legally protected names in Israel, but those are the two I’m aware of).
That’s why there’s the joke that so many Russians in Israel change their name to ‘Lavi’. Because they all wanted to change their name to ‘Levi’ when they arrive in Israel – and then find out that it’s not allowed to, so they end up with ‘Lavi’.
—————-
As for high-achieving or low-achieving. Names like ‘Cohen’ and ‘Levi’ will not be different from average – as they are found both equally in Middle Eastern and European populations (probably even more common with Middle Eastern demographics).
Descalzzo and it’s variants means shoeless an ancestor so poor they went barefoot.
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Yeah. Take, say, Washington. In the normal course of affairs, it would probably have a fairly upscale valence, but, due to its extreme popularity among Blacks ( a very downmarket demographic), it has prolish connotations in the USA and possibly beyond. If memory serves, HL Mencken has an anecdote about a German hotel being worried that a guest with the Washington surname might be Black….
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Aren’t tens of thousands of blacks named Pinckney after the owner of one of the biggest plantations in S Carolina.
Or maybe the priestly caste wasn’t very high-achieving…..
The Jewish equivalent of Clark would have to be Soffer/Sofer/Sopher/Sofaer. The sample turns out to be small, unfortunately: one Soffer in the $180,000s, and three Sophers down in the dumps.
But look up “Rabin” (“rabbi”). There are about 55 Rabins, Rabinowitz’s (“son of the rabbi”) etc, and the average salary looks pretty high, just eyeballing it.
Melamed/Melomed/Malamud/Lehrer/Lehrman/Lehrmann/Lerman (teacher) would be a good one to look up, for anyone willing to do the work.
Are there any black surnames? I thought Toney was black but then a quick image search showed some white faces.Replies: @S. Anonyia, @Jonathan Mason, @Ghost of Bull Moose
Ah, yes, I remember her well!
There are about a dozen Trumps there, and their average is lower middle class at best. This being 2016 data, Donald wasn’t yet there to pull up the average.
Surname spelling gets complicated:
Pewitt, Preuett, Preuit, Preuitt, Prewet, Prewett, Prewiett, Prewit, Prewitt, Priuett, Priuitt, Prouett, Prouitt, Prueite, Prueitt, Pruet, Pruett, Pruette, Pruewitt, Pruiett, Pruit, Pruitt, Pruitte
They came to America through Virginia, mostly.
Tennessee has the largest concentration of people with the surname Pewitt.
Cohen is found in both European and Middle Eastern populations. But it seems to be more common in Middle Eastern origin families in Israel than in European origin ones. Economic achievement is affected more by the country of origin from which different populations immigrated, than by who has more prestigious surnames within those different populations.
Amongst the Jews – I would guess a positive correlation with those with the most specifically German surnames and income, as these (‘the Yekkes’, as German Jews are called in Israel) are the historical demographic which was most successfully assimilated to secular life within Europe, prior to emigration. In Israel, German surname families like the Wertheimer family and the Strauss family are very dominant. I’d guess surnames like ‘Oppenheimer’ will have a strong correlation with income.
I am reminded of the following wonderful story, too good to be true I fear:
Emperor Franz Josef was a very punctilious man, and never shirked his duty. At the end of a long day, he was about to take off his uniform when a courtier entered the room with an embarrassed look: might His Imperial and Royal Highness spare a few moments for His Serene Highness the Prince of Loewenstein - Wertheim - Rosenberg?
The Emperor's hearing was not what it had been: "Doch, doch", he murmured, "escort the three old Jews in!"Replies: @Dmitry
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Would there be a way to control for that? Most demographic data has a racial component. Though, anecdotally, ive never met a white Washington, or Jefferson, for that matter.
Though, it’s interesting. My (white) wife’s maiden name was Davis. If she wore something with her surname on it she often received odd looks or even comments that, “Her daddy must be black.” Funny how it works. Most Davises I had met up to that point were white – squarely middle class white.
Stan Laurel's real name was Arthur Stanley Jefferson.Replies: @Cortes
Smith just means maker. So anyone who made things could have the name Smith.
Of course, these things can become updated. Did you know that one reputable dictionary (it might be the Oxford) now accepts that literally can mean metaphorically because it is a common usage. When I heard that, I was literally gobsmacked.Replies: @Anonymous
An apparent limitation to the database is that it doesn’t include Department of Defense civil servants, a significant fraction of the total. For instance, searching “Wright Patterson AFB” yields a single employee of the Small Business Administration, not a list of the 20K+ civilians employed there.
I have no idea whether this exclusion makes the list more or less representative of the “surname privilege” for the nation as a whole. But a look through the Air Force phone directory shows that the names at least are slightly better balanced: 34 Shapiros (7 civil servants, 8 contractors, 8 officers, 10 enlisted, 1 undetermined) vs 5 Sailers (1 civilian, 1 contractor, 1 officer, 2 enlisted).
Are there any black surnames? I thought Toney was black but then a quick image search showed some white faces.Replies: @S. Anonyia, @Jonathan Mason, @Ghost of Bull Moose
Washington and Jefferson? Maybe that’s just tv and movie characters, meant to remind whites why blacks are here in the first place.
Paris is as good a business woman as her ancestor who built the hotel chain.
Her parents were actually poor relations.
She made multi millions marketing herself as a dumb blonde and she retired years ago.
She started out with that reality show with Nicole Ritchie. They traveled the country working at minimum wage jobs and meeting ordinary people It was the best reality show ever.
The emphasis was on the places they went and the people they met. It was a tour of America Instead of sneering at flyover country and the deplorables, her show admired the deplorables and flyover country.
All she needed was some seed money from her family for a good PR agency and she was off.
Who knows what she’s really like?
I thought Palmer was someone who had been in a pilgrimage?
Helen Shapiro had the misfortune to go on tour in 1963 and be upstaged by one of her supporting acts, four lads from Liverpool. Lennon and McCartney wrote a song called “Misery” for her, but she never recorded it.
She continued in show business for many years, playing the role of Nancy in the London stage version of Oliver! and traveling for many years as a singer with jazzman Humphrey Littleton.
Her autobiography, published in 1993, was entitled Walking Back to Happiness, the title of her greatest hit. Just as well she did not record Misery, really!
I only know because I read the once-famous collection of letters between his father and Rupert Hart-Davies, back in the day.
They were not jazz fans - more inclined to Tennyson and Shakespeare.
Haven’t noticed that (though now I’ll be on the lookout) but I see black girls with comically misspelled French names all the time.
RKM engine was proposed by the physicist/poet Boris Shapiro
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RKM_engine
There’s well-known Israeli mathematician Ilya Shapiro
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Piatetski-Shapiro
On Russian wikipedia there’s a huge list of famous people with the surname.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE
——–
Although the information is not useful until we know what the number of people with this surname are in the respective countries.
Edit – 24,000 people with this surname in the United States.
The Arabic equivalent for Smith or blacksmith is Haddad, an extremely common name in Arab countries. The vast majority are, of course, Muslim but many are also Christian and even a few are Mizrachic Jews.
I loved this routine. It’s weird, though…Cheech and Chong sure got a historical pass from the MSM on the skits they used to do, like this one and Blind Melon Chittlins and Up His Nose it Goes. Warner Bros. cartoons of the 1940’s and 50’s and old movies with black maids and train porters get trotted out regularly and nailed for “racism”, but Cheech and Chong go largely unscathed.
Last week Steve told us that he wasn’t related to a guy with a very similar last name who had murdered someone. Now another criminal with a similar last name was just shot by a cop. I suppose he’s going to say he’s not related to him, either.
http://www.1011now.com/content/news/Man-taken-to-hospital-after-shots-fired-short-pursuit-with-LPD-468195293.html
I wonder how many Shapiros get arrested compared to everyone else?
McCormick or McCormack (Irish equivalent) is a common patronymic in Scotland and Ireland meaning son of Charles. The Scandinavian equivalent is Carlson (Sweden)/Carlsen (Denmark, Norway).
I have a fairly common Anglo surname (something like the 150 most common in the US), but damn 500 employed by the feds seems high. It does seem like the lower salaried names seem disproportionately black and the top ones are extra WASPy (William, Robert, John, Richard, etc),
Hard to say. But considering that the priesthood ended around 70AD, the Cohen genes have had a very long time to work their way through the population.
This is the same in Russia. Most people (serfs/peasants) took the surnames of their former owners, or alternatively place-names. As recently as first half of the 19th century most people (peasants) in Russian Empire did not have or need a surname.
Speaking of rabbis, it’s worth looking up the Greek equivalent: these would be all the names beginning with “Papa” (“priest”) and ending with “ou” or “os” (Greek case endings, don’t ask…) There’ll be something (possibly long) in between, typically a given name. Hence Papadopoulos, Papademetriou, Papandreou. Some of them will actually be Romanian, but that’s ok because Greek-surnamed Romanians were often aristocrats. For anyone willing to do the work…
Too bad the smartest Roman Catholics were sworn to celibacy.
That doesn't mean they didn't have children. Celibacy may have had a dysgenic effect in countries like Ireland or Spain where they took their vows seriously but not in Italy. Chaucer, Boccaccio, and even Martin Luther seem to have all agreed that in the late Middle Ages Priests and Monks were getting their rocks off probably more often than peasants.
Obviously the real privilege which stands out is federal employment. The mean and median for federal worker’s salaries are going to be pretty close as there are few incredibly highly compensated workers skewing the average higher. Compared to median U.S. households, federal workers make around 40-50% more. That number is obviously going to be much higher comparing black households and black households with a federal worker.
And Smith’s cousins, the Wrights: Ark, Mill, Ship.
Recently had my hair cut by a woman named Uniqua. No kidding.
Also with reference to a lack of federal employees named Laquisha as mentioned in a post above, I believe the name is more commonly spelled either as Lakeisha or as Lakesha, and, surprisingly to me, it is also used as a white name. Actually I know a white Lakesha.
The problem with made-up names is that if you are uneducated, you may well given your child the name of an unpleasant disease without knowing it. It has always baffled me that there is a chain of shoe stores called The Athletes Foot, apparently oblivious of the fact, or perhaps because of the fact that athlete's foot is a fungal infection that grows between the toes.
Of course it all depends where you are. In England I once met an American man called Randolph Hornblower, who said that in the US everyone called him "Horny". It was a relief for him to arrive in Britain where people asked him if he was "Randy".Replies: @syonredux, @Anonymous
And yet, in ancient times the smith was represented as lame, like Hephaestus. Some accounts (like the entry in the Oxford Classical Dictionary) attribute the depiction as realistic since lame individuals would be useless in soldiering or most agricultural tasks but could assist the community in the smithy. Another reason put forward (?by Robert Graves?) was that smiths were deliberately hobbled to prevent them marketing their invaluable skills elsewhere.
In his “Vanished Kingdoms” essay on the Welsh Kingdom of Strathclyde, Norman Davies makes a good case for the name Campbell (“broken or twisted mouth” in Scots Gaelic) as evidence that the family were holdouts speaking the old tongue when the population around them had switched to Gaelic with the influx of Irish.
More generally, the book “Names” by Basil Cottle is outstanding.
“all advantages are not due to unearned privilege”
They want you to think “unearned privilege” when you hear “privilege,” which is a dirty trick. Much like with “racism,”–which combines the desire to throw all members of a despised race into gas chambers with innocuously noticing people of a certain color are better at basketball–it’s a slippery term. You can’t pin them down.
It's disparate impact applied to everything in life. If anyone or group does better it is because they have an unfair advantage.
Arguably the greatest mathematician in the second half of the 20th-century is a Shapiro, if he had taken his father’s surname.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Grothendieck
Some names are just appropriations, like Chanel or Porsche, although not too many Portias.
Anyway, the database also shows 110 federal employees who have my surname, which I find shockingly high. In a half-century of consciousness, I've never randomly run across a single person with my surname, even with one of its several variant spellings. But I've met several Shapiros, who are represented in that database at the same rate.
I'm way too lazy to average these people's salaries, by the way: maybe I should be working for the federal government.Replies: @guest
“which I find shockingly high”
There are a LOT of federal employees.
Then there’s the question of percentages…..How much Cohen DNA does the average Ashkenazi have…..Useful to remember that the key factor in high Ashkenazi IQ was the fact that they specialized in White Collar trades (estate management, tax-farming, etc)….Perhaps the certified Cohens had less get-up-and-go…..
But not their brothers and sisters. The dysgenic effects of priestly celibacy have been overrated …..
Imagine a uniform initial population of Jews. The smartest guy in the family becomes a rabbi. He marries the prettiest girl in town, or the richest: both ways, he tends to have more offspring. Now his smartest son becomes a rabbi...etc.
Now start with a uniform population of Roman Catholics. Smartest boy in the family becomes a priest or a monk: then nothing. His siblings are nothing special (remember we started from a uniform population). Ok, maybe that smart boy's status as a priest improves his siblings' prospects on the marriage market. But they're still just average, so all that gets you is more children from average people.
If you wanted to breed a really big dog, how far would you get if you castrated the biggest puppy of every litter?Replies: @syonredux, @Crawfurdmuir
Since one can type in first name also, I tried with D’honte, Laquisha, Deshawn.
Nothing.
Must be institutional racism.
Perhaps another try: http://takimag.com/article/the_jacksun_also_rises_jim_goad/print ….
My surname has an average of 91.000, so moderate privilege on my part. It makes sense – mine is a Scottish surname. There are some distinguished people (both British and American) who have had it,
(the name was even used in one movie as the name of a snobby prep school). But there are also a fair amount of scots-irish redneck types who have it. The distribution of job titles seems to follow this…
It may be just a coincidence based the single character writing system, but it seems to me that having fewer unique names would help with any ostensibly social-minded philosophy. People may also be a tiny bit more willing to go along with Communism, if they don't have a uniquely bourgeois name.Replies: @Nico
Oriental countries do seem to have inherited a rather limited range of surnames compared with most Western countries, though it should be remembered that in Wales for example something like 30 surnames account for 90% of the population.
I read once in the Welsh Guards regiments of the Royal Army mail call or musters get interesting. So many Joneses for example it’s often “Private Jones Number 2, or Private Jones Number 9” etcReplies: @syonredux, @Cortes
If a man has only daughters (or no children) his name doesn't get passed to the next generation. Rare names are at a constant threat of disappearing. When a name dies because a man only had female offspring, the odds are it gets replaced by a common name, in fact the most likely replacement is the most common name in the culture. The more common a name is, the more likely it is that it is the name that takes over when another dies. Eventually any such last name system "degenerates" into a couple of common names that eat all the others.
My last name has a few dozen people and it's in two unrelated families. We didn't use inherited last names in my home region until the Russians took over 200 years ago and my home region is full of unique last names that exist only there. (Mine is the name of the estate that my great-great-great-grandfather acquired; it was standard for landowners to pick the names of their property.) In some other parts of Finland where inherited last names have been used for much longer there is much more domination by a couple of common names.Replies: @Nico
How many Smiths were originally Schmidts, Lefebvres, Ferraros, Ferreros, Smitses, Goffs, or Kovacs?
Note: Commenter Jonathan Mason stated the same in Comment #40.
“Any reasonable person would agree that she (Paris Hilton) is the epitome of highly dysfunctional societal priorities and toxic socioeconomic incentive structures, yet leftists are silent about her.”
She’s female, therefore has what in the UK are now officially called “protected characteristics”.
A male equivalent, a wealthy blond frat-boy type who screwed his way though the world, would probably be in jail or on the run like Haven Monahan.
On the other hand, as far as I know, Tucker Max is still at liberty.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-new-dating-game/article/416267
I thought Kraft was always an elite name. Yet, there is a prominent WN in NorCal who manages to get arrested once a month for very sordid crimes (assault with a deadly weapon, having sex in public, shoplifting, etc.). The nature of these crimes indicates poor impulse control and zero long-term thinking.
The two-year gap between otherwise-monthly arrests was only because he went to a different town :
http://mugshotssantacruz.com/search/?last_name=KRAFT&first_name=KEVIN&#prof
https://www.google.com/search?ei=l4tSWo6eCMXojwTjsJ6YCg&q=Kevin+Crawford+Kraft+arrests&oq=Kevin+Crawford+Kraft+arrests&gs_l=psy-ab.3..35i39k1l2.13686.16702.0.16825.17.12.1.0.0.0.154.939.0j8.8.0….0…1c.1.64.psy-ab..8.9.939….0.pSkp_vjpk6s
Has the Kraft name devolved?
I wonder if Patel is one of the highest-income surnames in America at this point (again, measuring income only).
Remember that many ultra-rich don’t have to report their full income on their 1040, as it is shielded through structures before that. So this does not capture the income of the ultra-wealthy.
I stayed at a Patel owned hotel recently where I got to talking with the swarthy owner about his hi-fi setup at home. This guy had purchased, new and at only a modest discount from retail, a setup consisting of "Stereophile Class A Recommended Components " costing more than the house he was living in. We talked about the technical issues for a minute and I brought up the cost issue, to which he responded that he bought stereo equipment with his cash income, and the house with railroad income (his facility did a lot of his business housing railcrews who go out to another location and back as soon as they have completed their rest period). He liked stereo equipment and watches because they are in the house and away from IRS eyes, and unlike cars aren't licensed and titled.
He had no idea what I did and wasn't concerned that he was essentially sharing the fact he was skimming large amounts of cash off his business with someone who for all he knew might have been IRS, FBI or whatever.
And really why shouldn't he do that? Does he have any real investment in the American nation? Hell no.Replies: @anon
Kowalski in Polish and related Slavic names are also variations on Smith.
There is no Huntingdon MA, not near Cambridge or anywhere else. There’s a Huntington MA which is in the western part of the state past Springfield/Northampton.
There is a Hunting(t)on Avenue in Boston, MA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huntington_Avenue
Though, it’s interesting. My (white) wife’s maiden name was Davis. If she wore something with her surname on it she often received odd looks or even comments that, “Her daddy must be black.” Funny how it works. Most Davises I had met up to that point were white - squarely middle class white.Replies: @Ripple Earthdevil, @prosa123
Davis is a fairly common name among Jews, which makes sense as it is derived from David.
Well, and then what? Relying on the siblings provides no mechanism for accumulating any genetic advantage.
Imagine a uniform initial population of Jews. The smartest guy in the family becomes a rabbi. He marries the prettiest girl in town, or the richest: both ways, he tends to have more offspring. Now his smartest son becomes a rabbi…etc.
Now start with a uniform population of Roman Catholics. Smartest boy in the family becomes a priest or a monk: then nothing. His siblings are nothing special (remember we started from a uniform population). Ok, maybe that smart boy’s status as a priest improves his siblings’ prospects on the marriage market. But they’re still just average, so all that gets you is more children from average people.
If you wanted to breed a really big dog, how far would you get if you castrated the biggest puppy of every litter?
Younger sons had career options in the church, the military, and after a point, in the law. One might become a clergyman because he was a poor physical specimen and not fit to be a soldier; such was the case with Talleyrand, who was lamed in an accident at the age of four, and made a churchman (becoming bishop of Autun in 1789, just as revolution was about to break out).
If an heir died leaving a priest next in line to titles and estates, it was not uncommon that he might be dispensed of his vows so that he might succeed to them. An example of this was Cesare Borgia, made archbishop of Valencia in 1492 and a cardinal in 1493. When his brother Giovanni died in 1497 (some say with "assistance" from his younger brother), Cesare sought release from his vows and renounced his cardinalate in 1498, to become Duke of Valentinois, gonfalonier and captain-general of the Holy Roman Church.
Monks and nuns present a different picture. Monasteries and convents supplied the mediaeval equivalent of social welfare services, finding accommodation and work for those who could get it nowhere else. Most such persons were not priests or even under religious vows, but worked on the estates belonging to religious institutions. However, some were admitted as serving brothers or sisters. Nunneries also functioned as homes for unmarriageable women - typically unmarriageable because their fathers could not afford dowries. Often they were sent to nunneries against their wishes, as in the lyrics of a well-known song of the period:
Une jeune fillette
de noble coeur,
Plaisante et joliette
de grand' valeur,
Outre son gré on l'a rendu nonnette
Cela point ne luy haicte
dont vit en grand' douleur...Replies: @International Jew, @Anonymous
…and Kowalski.
What’s Jewish for that anyway? Eisner?
Goldschmidt (Americanized Goldsmith), Kupferschmidt, Silberschmidt
From:
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/.premium-1.584816
..................................................................
Smith: Schmidt, Haddad, Schlosser, Blechman, Koval, Sayag, Goldschmidt, Zlotnick or Argentero
.................................................................
If “Smith” is common socially, then “Smithson”, the mere son of a smith, should be even more so.
But in fact it is perhaps the grandest English name of all, at least once it was transmogrified into “Percy” by the heir to the eponymous estates and, ultimately, the first Duke of Northumberland of the third creation.
And, of course, an illegitimate son of the house gave us the Smithsonian.
OT: The NYT wrote about alt-right men dating asian women, including John Derbyshire.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_GrothendieckReplies: @Dmitry
Very curious story. The father was born a Haredi – that turned into a some type of travelling liberal revolutionary. Cheated death in Tsarist dungeon. Chased out by Bolsheviks – eventually killed by the Nazis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sascha_Schapiro
Imagine a uniform initial population of Jews. The smartest guy in the family becomes a rabbi. He marries the prettiest girl in town, or the richest: both ways, he tends to have more offspring. Now his smartest son becomes a rabbi...etc.
Now start with a uniform population of Roman Catholics. Smartest boy in the family becomes a priest or a monk: then nothing. His siblings are nothing special (remember we started from a uniform population). Ok, maybe that smart boy's status as a priest improves his siblings' prospects on the marriage market. But they're still just average, so all that gets you is more children from average people.
If you wanted to breed a really big dog, how far would you get if you castrated the biggest puppy of every litter?Replies: @syonredux, @Crawfurdmuir
Elementary genetics. If I don’t reproduce but both of my siblings do……
Does he? Maybe the guy who becomes a rabbi is the one who likes sitting around….
My understanding is that the old idea of rabbis marrying the daughters of wealthy men is exaggerated….
Is he the smartest boy in the family? Perhaps he’s just the most pious….
Since heredity plays a role in IQ, odds say that the siblings of a guy with an above average IQ will also have above average IQs……
But you have raised an important HBD point about the Percy family, though maybe you were unaware. The best way I can illustrate the point is to contrast them with the Campbell family. The head of the clan is the Duke of Argyll. From the C14th onwards, they expanded rapidly. Some of the clan were blood relative of the Duke, but as they expanded they absorbed clansfolk from other clans, who adopted the name Campbell. By the C17th the latter formed the overwhelming majority of the clan. By this time Campbell was a very common name. Add to that, there are Irish Campbells who have no connection to Scots Campbells whatsoever. Rather like the Scots and Irish Kennedys ( Kennedy is a much more common name in Scotland )
By contrast, the Percy have always been a small Northumbrian clan. The head of the clan was and is the Duke of Northumberland. The Campbells basically tried to take over most of Argyll ( not good if you were a MacDonald ) whereas the Percys remained in the Alnwick-Warkworth area and left the other clans ( Heron, Collingwood, Cuthbert etc ) in place. I suspect that nearly all those born with the Percy surname are related to each other from the Middle Ages onwards. They are not numerous, but I have never met a poor one. They all seem to have affluent lifestyles. Indeed, one of them was even the Councillor of the Ward I lived in. As well as that, they all seemed to have similar discreet, well-mannered characteristics - not what you would expect from relatives of Harry Hotspur.
The differences between" Mass Clans" and small, apparently related clans are often quite sharp. The former ( eg Campbells, MacDonalds etc ) have expanded by agglomeration. Comparatively few are related to each other or the main branch of the clan. They are a mixed bag of humanity.
Small clans seem often to be formed of related persons. This is particularly noticeable with small, aristocratic clans like the Percys. Another example are the Mars, Marrs or Erskines. All three surnames are associated with the Earldom of Mar ( the World's oldest title ). Nearly all persons of these surnames are surmised to be related. As I said about the Percys, I've never met a poor one. And that goes for the ones who changed their names as well - like The Smiths' Johnny Marr, who changed his name from ( low class Irish ) Maher to ( aristocratic Scots ) Marr. Instant Surname Privilege !Replies: @Old Palo Altan, @Coemgen, @anonymouslee, @Expletive Deleted
Highly interesting, thank you.
I agree about the Percys – I too have never met a poor one.
I do happen to know, on the other, that a family of lower class Erskines live, not only in Scotland, but actually in Alloa, the site of the historic seat of the Earls of Mar.
Servants who took the name, or perhaps an illegitimate branch? In any case, they are always courteously treated by the head of the family.
Actually the story is even more bizarre than you realise. The Mar clan originated in the Mar region, north of Aberdeen. By the 18th Century, most of the clan were living near Alloa, Clacks, Scotland. Only a residue lived in Mar. By this time, the earl and nearly all the Lowland clan bore the surname Erskine. Only the Highland clan retained the name Mar(r).
After "Bobbing John", the earl at the time, got forfeited ( 1715 Jacobite Rebellion), things got even more complicated. This came to a head in the 1875 House of Lords case. It found that the Earl of Mar ( 1st Creation- according to the House of Lords ) was entitled (ho ho ho) to aforesaid title and was chief of clan Mar(r). The Earl of Mar and Kellie ( 7th Creation - according to House of Lords ) was entitled to aforesaid title and was chief of clan Erskine.
This looks like a complete victory for the Earl of Mar. He is recognised as numero uno. He keeps the upmarket Mar(r)s. The Earl of Mar and Kellie is demoted to number 7 and has the more diverse Erskines.
Then things get bonkers. The House of Lords agrees that the Earldom is the successor to the Mormaer of Mar going back a thousand years. And, of course, a thousand years ago, nobody had surnames. Thus the Earl of Mar is summarily excised of his surname. The present incumbent is Margaret of Mar, 31st Countess of Mar. She does NOT have a surname.
She cannot have surname privilege because she has been legally removed of her surname !
Always happy to keep an old Scots American informed.
A lot of the European ones are called Katz rather than Cohen. And then there’s also Kagan/Kogan.
Not bad, average Shen federal salary comes out to $115,771.72, despite Shen not being a particularly common Chinese surname! Unfortunately though, I doubt this represents any kind of privilege. As I’ve repeatedly been arguing, Asian Americans are actually the most openly discriminated against group in American society today.
What the Asian-Americans giveth, the Asian-Americans taketh away on USB flash drives.
The earls of Huntington are distinguished, and their surname is Hastings, which also tends to be the same. The surname Huntington on the other hand is of no particular distinction in England.
Hamilton is the most distinguished aristocratic name in Scotland – two dukedoms, two earldoms, a viscountcy, two baronies, three baronetcies, and four families of the landed gentry; all this without counting the extinct titles.
I would wager then that something like 90% of the Oxford and Cambridge graduates bearing this name were scions of one or another of these families.
It could be that Smith was a relatively large proportion of a certain smaller class of artisans that grew to a larger proportion of the overall population as the country became more middle class in general.
That was my understanding too, until I checked Wikipedia, where it is claimed to mean someone who makes things with metal (confirmed by my 1970 Oxford Dictionary).
Of course, these things can become updated. Did you know that one reputable dictionary (it might be the Oxford) now accepts that literally can mean metaphorically because it is a common usage. When I heard that, I was literally gobsmacked.
Duos like literally/figuratively and nauseous/nauseating are particularly disappointing because the result is that we no longer have words which mean what the former of each of those pairs used to mean. There are many such examples and one effect is that our ability to think about things is actually diminished.Replies: @englishmike
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Washington was the first name I tried. Over 1,000 results. Interestingly, the top paid Shapiros are all physicians while for the top paid Washingtons you see only a couple physicians and a fair amount of jobs like “Miscellaneous Administration.” There also appear to be about 400 Washingtons working for the VA.
I satisfied myself that yes indeed, there were a few $200k+ bearers of my surname. And then there were a few hundred of our ne-er in-laws and pretenders eking out $30-40k – at least they were employed is all I can say for their efforts.
I only got so far, but I figure the first hundred or so results just happened to be a poor sample and there must have been a good many $250k+ guys hanging out at the back with names like Terence, William and Xavier.
Yep, like info on every federal employee and all security clearance applications, including mine, from OPM. Now in the hands of the ChiComs.
Did I mention that a female POC was head of OPM at the time, and that no one was punished?
Is he the smartest boy in the family? Perhaps he’s just the most pious….
Or maybe he just wants to be a fabulous entertainer, the star of the show every Sunday, with a great excuse for not having to marry and a supply of willing altar boys.
Kogan is just very common Russian spelling of Cohen. Although nowadays the name spread around a lot to people which are hardly Cohens in the original sense. At my college there was a blonde, cross-wearing (Christian) girl with the surname.
Not to mention that a man who rose far in the medieval Church was likely to be in a position to raise his relatives status…
I agree about the Percys - I too have never met a poor one.
I do happen to know, on the other, that a family of lower class Erskines live, not only in Scotland, but actually in Alloa, the site of the historic seat of the Earls of Mar.
Servants who took the name, or perhaps an illegitimate branch? In any case, they are always courteously treated by the head of the family.Replies: @Ivy, @Verymuchalive
C of E offspring took a slightly different path, where younger son(s) went into the priesthood since elder brothers had staked out the primogeniture and military roles.
But in fact it is perhaps the grandest English name of all, at least once it was transmogrified into "Percy" by the heir to the eponymous estates and, ultimately, the first Duke of Northumberland of the third creation.
And, of course, an illegitimate son of the house gave us the Smithsonian.Replies: @Cortes, @Charles Erwin Wilson
McGowan is also Smithson.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.htmlReplies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @guest, @anon
They even linked to an unz.com comment (“As a commenter wrote on an alt-right forum…”). (The commenter is A. Karlin though.)
Hi, mom!
All Wertheimers are related, as are all Oppenheimers. But these are fairly recent families, which took their name from their towns of origin. Frankfurter too, although from such a big place many families of the name may well have issued forth.
I am reminded of the following wonderful story, too good to be true I fear:
Emperor Franz Josef was a very punctilious man, and never shirked his duty. At the end of a long day, he was about to take off his uniform when a courtier entered the room with an embarrassed look: might His Imperial and Royal Highness spare a few moments for His Serene Highness the Prince of Loewenstein – Wertheim – Rosenberg?
The Emperor’s hearing was not what it had been: “Doch, doch”, he murmured, “escort the three old Jews in!”
The ones in France don't seem to be related, although they come from near the same region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Wertheimer
--- I don't know of Oppenheimers in Israel. But you can see them in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_HodgeSouth Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Oppenheimer
Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheim_familyUS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_OppenheimerReplies: @IHTG, @Joe Stalin
I know a women named Perma, unfortunately she is not a hairdresser, but she tells me her name is even uniquer than Uniqua.
Also with reference to a lack of federal employees named Laquisha as mentioned in a post above, I believe the name is more commonly spelled either as Lakeisha or as Lakesha, and, surprisingly to me, it is also used as a white name. Actually I know a white Lakesha.
The problem with made-up names is that if you are uneducated, you may well given your child the name of an unpleasant disease without knowing it. It has always baffled me that there is a chain of shoe stores called The Athletes Foot, apparently oblivious of the fact, or perhaps because of the fact that athlete’s foot is a fungal infection that grows between the toes.
Of course it all depends where you are. In England I once met an American man called Randolph Hornblower, who said that in the US everyone called him “Horny”. It was a relief for him to arrive in Britain where people asked him if he was “Randy”.
I don’t have the exact numbers, but my well-educated guess is American Jews are north of 95% Ashkenazi, with the remainder mostly nouveau riche, gold-chain-wearing recent Persian and Israeli immigrants. It’s safe to assume any American named Cohen, Cohn, Kohn et al is 100% Ashkenazi, or at least 0% other-kinds-of-Jews.
The Grandees: The Story of America's Sephardic Elite
by Stephen Birmingham
https://www.amazon.com/Grandees-Americas-Sephardic-Modern-History/dp/0815604599Replies: @snorlax
i'll mention your theory to the folks at the Spanish and Portugese Synagogue in New York (established in 1654)
the sfardim have been in the New World since the late 1590's. At which time, by the way, their cousins had already been in Tiberias for a hundred years or so.
Google on "American Sephardi". These folks consider themselves as Blue Bloods. And in many ways, they ==do== have a better claim to be Judean than any recent British Royal Family has a claim to being English.Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
I only got so far, but I figure the first hundred or so results just happened to be a poor sample and there must have been a good many $250k+ guys hanging out at the back with names like Terence, William and Xavier.Replies: @Anonymous
That was supposed to be ‘ne’er do well’.
Bob Shapiro was the CEO of Monsanto.
Not to mention Cart and Wain, but Play never seems to have become a surname.
I had googled Margaret Thatcher since I remembered her maiden name was Roberts (Welsh patrynomic & all that). I was curious to see if she had any recent Welsh forbears but instead shockingly enough her father’s grandmother was Irish Catholic (Sullivan no less). This is of course the Iron Lady we are speaking of who survived the IRA and it was a fact I had never known about.
It prompts me to reflect that despite the Famine & pogroms (which were horrific historical experiences) one of the main gripes of Irish Catholic & Jewish communities is that to socially advance they had to assimilate into WASP society in the 19th & 20th centuries.
In those cases assimilation meant giving up a particularly tenaciously held religious-cultural identity that had survived so much and to somehow let it go for societal advancement seemed churlish, almost cowardly. It’s interesting that all discrimination simply melted away when these two groups gave up the Pope & the Synagogue so it wasn’t really founded on race (an Anglo-Irish was simply a Protestant Irishman).
Finally Jews in Britain & the Irish in America seem much more culturally quiescient than their trans-Atlantic counterparts. That may be because of the preponderance of White identity in the US (which Irish Americans are comfortable with) and English-British in the UK (which British Jews but not the Irish partake in; a historical insult has been “West British”).
The English surname is Roper, though English mountaineers do sometimes use the technique known as abseiling that involves the use of a rope.
I seem to share my surname with 350 federal employees. I’m not going to calculate an average, but I did note that one guy makes a whopping $330,000 per year. Curiously, he lives in the same city that I do, although I am not related to him and I do not know him.
Maybe there is a tendency for upscale Smiths to become Smythes. But downwardly mobile Smythes might feel the urge to change to Smith to fit in? This would bed in the surname privilege over time.Replies: @englishmike
No. Steve was using the plural: “Smythes…really are”…
Yeah: Hispano-Americans are completely out of control in that regard. Just check out the names among random Major League players and compare them to real Spanish Christian names. I can think of no Saint Yasiel, Yadier, Asdrubal, Kendrys or even–if we’re gonna get all technical about it–Jhonny.
Hannibal (of the elephant-over-the-alps fame) had a brother and second in command known in English as Hasdrubal. Spanish has a odd relationship with the "h" sound, so Asdrubal is a solid rendering.
In Spain proper, Hannibal and his reign have a "home town" feel. Hannibal colonized much of what we know as the modern Spanish cities etc. he is as good a place as any to start as a Founding Father for a cohesive, collective Spain rather than stand-alone city states. As an example, Hannibal's clan name is Barca, from which we get Barcelona.
Hannibal/Hasdrubal have cachet in Spanish that, while not mirrored in English or French, *is* a longstanding, organic element of culture. Asdrubal =/= Deshawndreisha
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasdrubal_Barca
Anibal is quite a popular name (famous Argentine tango star was Anibal Troilo) also.
A small handful descend from the Sephardic Jews who settled here in the Colonial Period:
The Grandees: The Story of America’s Sephardic Elite
by Stephen Birmingham
I am reminded of the following wonderful story, too good to be true I fear:
Emperor Franz Josef was a very punctilious man, and never shirked his duty. At the end of a long day, he was about to take off his uniform when a courtier entered the room with an embarrassed look: might His Imperial and Royal Highness spare a few moments for His Serene Highness the Prince of Loewenstein - Wertheim - Rosenberg?
The Emperor's hearing was not what it had been: "Doch, doch", he murmured, "escort the three old Jews in!"Replies: @Dmitry
The Wertheimers in Israel are from Kippenheim in South West Germany – according to Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stef_Wertheimer
The ones in France don’t seem to be related, although they come from near the same region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Wertheimer
—
I don’t know of Oppenheimers in Israel.
But you can see them in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hodge
South Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Oppenheimer
Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheim_family
US
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer
Also with reference to a lack of federal employees named Laquisha as mentioned in a post above, I believe the name is more commonly spelled either as Lakeisha or as Lakesha, and, surprisingly to me, it is also used as a white name. Actually I know a white Lakesha.
The problem with made-up names is that if you are uneducated, you may well given your child the name of an unpleasant disease without knowing it. It has always baffled me that there is a chain of shoe stores called The Athletes Foot, apparently oblivious of the fact, or perhaps because of the fact that athlete's foot is a fungal infection that grows between the toes.
Of course it all depends where you are. In England I once met an American man called Randolph Hornblower, who said that in the US everyone called him "Horny". It was a relief for him to arrive in Britain where people asked him if he was "Randy".Replies: @syonredux, @Anonymous
I always assumed that they were being playful……
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.htmlReplies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @guest, @anon
She keeps talking about “myths”…
The subject has been immortalized in the hilarious Charisma Man comics.
http://www.charismaman.com
OT: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-07/wikileaks-publishes-michael-wolffs-entire-sold-out-trump-book-pdf
I’m with Nikki Haley who told little Georgie S that she hadn’t and wouldn’t read it.
Great to see that DJT has told both the UN and Pakistan to go pound sand.
Also, besides that John Boehner episode, nobody has said one word in rebuttal.
The Grandees: The Story of America's Sephardic Elite
by Stephen Birmingham
https://www.amazon.com/Grandees-Americas-Sephardic-Modern-History/dp/0815604599Replies: @snorlax
But they were tiny in number compared to the later Ashkenazi immigration, and (AFAIK) no longer exist as a distinct group due to intermarriage with the Ashkenazi and gentile populations.
The ones in France don't seem to be related, although they come from near the same region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Wertheimer
--- I don't know of Oppenheimers in Israel. But you can see them in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_HodgeSouth Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Oppenheimer
Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheim_familyUS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_OppenheimerReplies: @IHTG, @Joe Stalin
You definitely know one. Peace Now!
“Wales for example something like 30 surnames account for 90% of the population.”
I read once in the Welsh Guards regiments of the Royal Army mail call or musters get interesting. So many Joneses for example it’s often “Private Jones Number 2, or Private Jones Number 9” etc
Jimmy Sue (for his wife) to distinguish from ten other Jimmy Gardiners
Black Angus (hair or temper) for the same reason.Or one guy called Eddie Gallagher (a “blow-in”) who was referred to by all as Eddie Barrett (wife’s surname).
Maybe, but there’s an awful lot of “Cohen” variants to explain. Kohen, Kahane, Kagan, Cohn, Cohan, Cohane, Cohne, Cone, Kahn, Kaganovich, etc. It’s basically “King” for Jews. Descendants of the priestly caste.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4454-cohen
https://www.geni.com/projects/The-Cohen-Project/808
https://www.geni.com/surnames/Cohen
The New Jews (ex-russian empire, late 19th century) are insatiable surname stealers (the post -Cromwell crowd are pretty OK people, I find). But only of the minor aristocracy and provincial gentry. Therefore northern-English, Welsh and Scottish “Norman” names are ludicrously overrepresented among Thatcher’s “old Estonians, not old Etonians”.
For some no doubt Dunning/Kruger reason, they think that )))we((( can’t tell, or that others can’t.
Like no man ever looked like his father, ever, in this island.
(Bad news, Jews. I can even tell a Catholic at 30 yards, never mind a Welshman. Anyone who clumsily attempts to conceal their Kindred, Name and indeed House in this manner will be tret according. We’ve been doing this since … forever. Think on …)
I note with interest that neither common Saxon names nor (insanely hazardous, feud-risking) Gaelic names are ever suborned in this manner. Says a lot about (((their))) intentions over “integration” with the aborigines.
A great reason to end immigration of Asians. Spare them the oppression, and ourselves the whining.
Not at all. Literacy–that in the initial screen/cull to startup Ashkenazi, literacy at the recite the Torah level would be a selection factor giving you a good IQ at launch–has been proposed by lots of people including me. (JackD suggested even this might not be the case–you didn’t really have to be literate to do the necessary ritual recitation.)
However, grinding through the centuries what’s really going to be selective is economic performance. Do you want to marry your really hot/healthy/fertile daughter to the rabbi’s boy, or the son of the successfully banker or grain trader? All else even close to equal, my daughter’s going with B.
It’s actually the economic benefit of IQ that will drive selection–better survival of children, and ergo better mates to have children with.
The Jewish community can through monetary support and bestowing social status drive up the relative standing of the rabbi and appeal of the young rabbis as marriage partners. But it’s hard for it to be at the very top in a community that is doing so well in intellectually demanding professions. And then the real breakout of the Jewish community in the last couple hundred years was when they realized the goyim had actually shot by them in intellectual development while they were treading water in their little closed backwater. The folks/families leading the charge to engage with European intellectual developments, were not the rabbinate.
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Back when he was funny, Bill Simmons compiled a list he called the Reggie Cleveland All-Stars. This was a list of white athletes whose names made them sound black.
“Asdrubal” isn’t too odd.
Hannibal (of the elephant-over-the-alps fame) had a brother and second in command known in English as Hasdrubal. Spanish has a odd relationship with the “h” sound, so Asdrubal is a solid rendering.
In Spain proper, Hannibal and his reign have a “home town” feel. Hannibal colonized much of what we know as the modern Spanish cities etc. he is as good a place as any to start as a Founding Father for a cohesive, collective Spain rather than stand-alone city states. As an example, Hannibal’s clan name is Barca, from which we get Barcelona.
Hannibal/Hasdrubal have cachet in Spanish that, while not mirrored in English or French, *is* a longstanding, organic element of culture. Asdrubal =/= Deshawndreisha
Can’t see much wrong with Asdrubal…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasdrubal_Barca
Anibal is quite a popular name (famous Argentine tango star was Anibal Troilo) also.
Imagine a uniform initial population of Jews. The smartest guy in the family becomes a rabbi. He marries the prettiest girl in town, or the richest: both ways, he tends to have more offspring. Now his smartest son becomes a rabbi...etc.
Now start with a uniform population of Roman Catholics. Smartest boy in the family becomes a priest or a monk: then nothing. His siblings are nothing special (remember we started from a uniform population). Ok, maybe that smart boy's status as a priest improves his siblings' prospects on the marriage market. But they're still just average, so all that gets you is more children from average people.
If you wanted to breed a really big dog, how far would you get if you castrated the biggest puppy of every litter?Replies: @syonredux, @Crawfurdmuir
Your premise is wrong. In mediaeval times, it was not the smartest boy in the family that became a priest – it was a younger son who would not inherit the family’s estates. He was, in other words, a spare rather than an heir. Priests were drawn from the “better” classes – as a rule they had to be legitimate, and free-born (so, not of the villein caste). In some places all four grandparents had to be armigerous.
Younger sons had career options in the church, the military, and after a point, in the law. One might become a clergyman because he was a poor physical specimen and not fit to be a soldier; such was the case with Talleyrand, who was lamed in an accident at the age of four, and made a churchman (becoming bishop of Autun in 1789, just as revolution was about to break out).
If an heir died leaving a priest next in line to titles and estates, it was not uncommon that he might be dispensed of his vows so that he might succeed to them. An example of this was Cesare Borgia, made archbishop of Valencia in 1492 and a cardinal in 1493. When his brother Giovanni died in 1497 (some say with “assistance” from his younger brother), Cesare sought release from his vows and renounced his cardinalate in 1498, to become Duke of Valentinois, gonfalonier and captain-general of the Holy Roman Church.
Monks and nuns present a different picture. Monasteries and convents supplied the mediaeval equivalent of social welfare services, finding accommodation and work for those who could get it nowhere else. Most such persons were not priests or even under religious vows, but worked on the estates belonging to religious institutions. However, some were admitted as serving brothers or sisters. Nunneries also functioned as homes for unmarriageable women – typically unmarriageable because their fathers could not afford dowries. Often they were sent to nunneries against their wishes, as in the lyrics of a well-known song of the period:
Une jeune fillette
de noble coeur,
Plaisante et joliette
de grand’ valeur,
Outre son gré on l’a rendu nonnette
Cela point ne luy haicte
dont vit en grand’ douleur…
The ones in France don't seem to be related, although they come from near the same region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Wertheimer
--- I don't know of Oppenheimers in Israel. But you can see them in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_HodgeSouth Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Oppenheimer
Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheim_familyUS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_OppenheimerReplies: @IHTG, @Joe Stalin
One of Robert Oppenheimer’s children went to Hyde Park HS in Chicago in the 1960s.
Variants of Cohen
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
If it’s a reasonably common name, just throw in a white first name (Brian, Clive, Nigel, Alan) to ethnic-cleanse the sample
Say what you will about Donald John Trump, he’s a billionaire, and he only had a few million handed to him. He’s done alright for a shaygets in a very Jewish millieu. He has drive and ambition and balls. Neither Obama nor GWB can say that.
However, grinding through the centuries what's really going to be selective is economic performance. Do you want to marry your really hot/healthy/fertile daughter to the rabbi's boy, or the son of the successfully banker or grain trader? All else even close to equal, my daughter's going with B.
It's actually the economic benefit of IQ that will drive selection--better survival of children, and ergo better mates to have children with.
The Jewish community can through monetary support and bestowing social status drive up the relative standing of the rabbi and appeal of the young rabbis as marriage partners. But it's hard for it to be at the very top in a community that is doing so well in intellectually demanding professions. And then the real breakout of the Jewish community in the last couple hundred years was when they realized the goyim had actually shot by them in intellectual development while they were treading water in their little closed backwater. The folks/families leading the charge to engage with European intellectual developments, were not the rabbinate.Replies: @syonredux, @kaganovitch
Literacy is a very low bar; people with Down’s Syndrome can learn how to read. I doubt that that had much of a eugenic effect.
Aren’t names like Kohn, Cohn, Kahn, and Caan just other versions of Cohen?
Here’s my rule for immigration: Don’t allow in anyone who can make a claim for discrimination based on ethnic/racial/religious grounds.
Gazillion years ago I was interviewed at a small liberal arts college by a black man named Leslie Cohen. “Just like the Jews,” he said.
I’ve never seen a lot of these Cohen variations, yet one of the most well-known ones due to a pair of film-making brothers isn’t even on the list.
Jhonny is a shorted form of the Spanish name Jhonattan, as for example in the professional golfer Jhonattan Vegas. It is a somewhat phonetic (in Spanish) rendition of the Jewish name Yonatan which comes from the Old Testament. Jonathan was the best friend (?lover) of King David, an important Bronze Age chieftain in Jewish history.
So not a saint’s name.
Yasiel is a Spanish version of the biblical Jasiel = whom God made, and also one of King David’s cohorts.
So not a saint’s name.
Asdrubal would be a Spanish version of the name of the Carthaginian general Hasdrubal Barca who was the son of Hamilcar and brother of Hannibal. There is some suggestion that the city of Barcelona is named after this family, but scholars consider this to be a folk derivation.
So not a Christian saint’s name either.
Yadier is a popular Hispanic name with Jewish origins, compare to Yadira.
Some of the Cohens may actually be Cohans,
I read once in the Welsh Guards regiments of the Royal Army mail call or musters get interesting. So many Joneses for example it’s often “Private Jones Number 2, or Private Jones Number 9” etcReplies: @syonredux, @Cortes
From Zulu:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058777/quotes
I read once in the Welsh Guards regiments of the Royal Army mail call or musters get interesting. So many Joneses for example it’s often “Private Jones Number 2, or Private Jones Number 9” etcReplies: @syonredux, @Cortes
Nicknames (eke or eik names to which the n of the indefinite article became attached) are necessary in many places.
Jimmy Sue (for his wife) to distinguish from ten other Jimmy Gardiners
Black Angus (hair or temper) for the same reason.
Or one guy called Eddie Gallagher (a “blow-in”) who was referred to by all as Eddie Barrett (wife’s surname).
How many Patels honestly report all their income?
I stayed at a Patel owned hotel recently where I got to talking with the swarthy owner about his hi-fi setup at home. This guy had purchased, new and at only a modest discount from retail, a setup consisting of “Stereophile Class A Recommended Components ” costing more than the house he was living in. We talked about the technical issues for a minute and I brought up the cost issue, to which he responded that he bought stereo equipment with his cash income, and the house with railroad income (his facility did a lot of his business housing railcrews who go out to another location and back as soon as they have completed their rest period). He liked stereo equipment and watches because they are in the house and away from IRS eyes, and unlike cars aren’t licensed and titled.
He had no idea what I did and wasn’t concerned that he was essentially sharing the fact he was skimming large amounts of cash off his business with someone who for all he knew might have been IRS, FBI or whatever.
And really why shouldn’t he do that? Does he have any real investment in the American nation? Hell no.
did you ever square dance? Maybe your kids learned square dancing in school. Like many other Americans of your vintage, you may be part of an unwitting experiment.
https://qz.com/1153516/americas-wholesome-square-dancing-tradition-is-a-tool-of-white-supremacy/Replies: @Steve Sailer, @guest
So that’s why rap music sounds like square dance calling.
But you have raised an important HBD point about the Percy family, though maybe you were unaware. The best way I can illustrate the point is to contrast them with the Campbell family. The head of the clan is the Duke of Argyll. From the C14th onwards, they expanded rapidly. Some of the clan were blood relative of the Duke, but as they expanded they absorbed clansfolk from other clans, who adopted the name Campbell. By the C17th the latter formed the overwhelming majority of the clan. By this time Campbell was a very common name. Add to that, there are Irish Campbells who have no connection to Scots Campbells whatsoever. Rather like the Scots and Irish Kennedys ( Kennedy is a much more common name in Scotland )
By contrast, the Percy have always been a small Northumbrian clan. The head of the clan was and is the Duke of Northumberland. The Campbells basically tried to take over most of Argyll ( not good if you were a MacDonald ) whereas the Percys remained in the Alnwick-Warkworth area and left the other clans ( Heron, Collingwood, Cuthbert etc ) in place. I suspect that nearly all those born with the Percy surname are related to each other from the Middle Ages onwards. They are not numerous, but I have never met a poor one. They all seem to have affluent lifestyles. Indeed, one of them was even the Councillor of the Ward I lived in. As well as that, they all seemed to have similar discreet, well-mannered characteristics - not what you would expect from relatives of Harry Hotspur.
The differences between" Mass Clans" and small, apparently related clans are often quite sharp. The former ( eg Campbells, MacDonalds etc ) have expanded by agglomeration. Comparatively few are related to each other or the main branch of the clan. They are a mixed bag of humanity.
Small clans seem often to be formed of related persons. This is particularly noticeable with small, aristocratic clans like the Percys. Another example are the Mars, Marrs or Erskines. All three surnames are associated with the Earldom of Mar ( the World's oldest title ). Nearly all persons of these surnames are surmised to be related. As I said about the Percys, I've never met a poor one. And that goes for the ones who changed their names as well - like The Smiths' Johnny Marr, who changed his name from ( low class Irish ) Maher to ( aristocratic Scots ) Marr. Instant Surname Privilege !Replies: @Old Palo Altan, @Coemgen, @anonymouslee, @Expletive Deleted
The original name of the clan Campbell was O’Duibhne…
The most likely explanation is that Asians have been running the last name system for the longest time. Probability favors the growth of the common names at the expense of the rare ones so these systems tend to end up with a few overwhelmingly common names.
If a man has only daughters (or no children) his name doesn’t get passed to the next generation. Rare names are at a constant threat of disappearing. When a name dies because a man only had female offspring, the odds are it gets replaced by a common name, in fact the most likely replacement is the most common name in the culture. The more common a name is, the more likely it is that it is the name that takes over when another dies. Eventually any such last name system “degenerates” into a couple of common names that eat all the others.
My last name has a few dozen people and it’s in two unrelated families. We didn’t use inherited last names in my home region until the Russians took over 200 years ago and my home region is full of unique last names that exist only there. (Mine is the name of the estate that my great-great-great-grandfather acquired; it was standard for landowners to pick the names of their property.) In some other parts of Finland where inherited last names have been used for much longer there is much more domination by a couple of common names.
She continued in show business for many years, playing the role of Nancy in the London stage version of Oliver! and traveling for many years as a singer with jazzman Humphrey Littleton.
Her autobiography, published in 1993, was entitled Walking Back to Happiness, the title of her greatest hit. Just as well she did not record Misery, really!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2fklppAAXsReplies: @anonymous
Humphrey Lyttelton, not Littleton.
I only know because I read the once-famous collection of letters between his father and Rupert Hart-Davies, back in the day.
They were not jazz fans – more inclined to Tennyson and Shakespeare.
> Sailer is one of the more elite golfcourse surnames
fixed it for you.
Source: http://www.golfcourseindustry.com (“the voice for today’s superintendent!”)
Thanks, I see now.
rolling over in their gravesstill dissipated ashes stuck in an eddy in the Huang He delta.It's the US Feral Government, Mr. Yan or Mr. Shen! What possible useful activities could any of those people on the list be doing?Replies: @AnotherDadAsians–world champion cultural appropriators.
Old Yan has even carefully observed our traditions of racial grievance and whining and learned to do it over trivial to non-existence stuff like a Jewish guy.
Seriously old boy, if your kid can’t get into Harvard with his test prepped SAT scores and all that violin playing … bitch to the Jews in charge, not the rest of us.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4454-cohen
https://www.geni.com/projects/The-Cohen-Project/808https://www.geni.com/surnames/CohenReplies: @Dmitry
It mainly looks like just different ways to transliterate the letters in the original Hebrew word (with vowels, without vowels, with different interpretations of the vowels, etc).
The funny one there is Katz, which was formed from the initials of ‘Holy Priest’ (although written the other way round).
Others are what happens when you translate the word into another language or add a suffix.
—
There’s a reverse situation for Russian women’s surnames in Hebrew – where they usually lose their suffixes in Israel, to make it easier for Israelis that don’t understand the naming conventions. (And result sounds very eccentric to Russian ears).
Though, it’s interesting. My (white) wife’s maiden name was Davis. If she wore something with her surname on it she often received odd looks or even comments that, “Her daddy must be black.” Funny how it works. Most Davises I had met up to that point were white - squarely middle class white.Replies: @Ripple Earthdevil, @prosa123
“Though, anecdotally, ive never met a white Washington, or Jefferson, for that matter.”
Stan Laurel’s real name was Arthur Stanley Jefferson.
https://www.britanniapanopticon.org
As a kid I was fascinated by the surname M’Sadoques. I knew a few people by that name. Something about the M-apostrophe just seemed weird.
The name is French and is pronounced something like Massa-dokes.
Min = 99 k
Max = 206 kReplies: @anon
Ran an experiment to see if there is any Brahmin privilege; seems to be none, though they are most numerous. In fact Vyshya (Businessmen) have privilege.
Sharma: 133K (count 171), US + 50K
Varma/Verma: 133K (65), US + 50K
Gupta: 212K (129), US + 129K
Das*: 130K (77), US + 47K
count 26
Average = 144k
Max = $318 KReplies: @anon
Let’s also not forget our uh good friend Ben Shapiro, aka The Hebrew Hammerhead Shark. TFIFY.
But you have raised an important HBD point about the Percy family, though maybe you were unaware. The best way I can illustrate the point is to contrast them with the Campbell family. The head of the clan is the Duke of Argyll. From the C14th onwards, they expanded rapidly. Some of the clan were blood relative of the Duke, but as they expanded they absorbed clansfolk from other clans, who adopted the name Campbell. By the C17th the latter formed the overwhelming majority of the clan. By this time Campbell was a very common name. Add to that, there are Irish Campbells who have no connection to Scots Campbells whatsoever. Rather like the Scots and Irish Kennedys ( Kennedy is a much more common name in Scotland )
By contrast, the Percy have always been a small Northumbrian clan. The head of the clan was and is the Duke of Northumberland. The Campbells basically tried to take over most of Argyll ( not good if you were a MacDonald ) whereas the Percys remained in the Alnwick-Warkworth area and left the other clans ( Heron, Collingwood, Cuthbert etc ) in place. I suspect that nearly all those born with the Percy surname are related to each other from the Middle Ages onwards. They are not numerous, but I have never met a poor one. They all seem to have affluent lifestyles. Indeed, one of them was even the Councillor of the Ward I lived in. As well as that, they all seemed to have similar discreet, well-mannered characteristics - not what you would expect from relatives of Harry Hotspur.
The differences between" Mass Clans" and small, apparently related clans are often quite sharp. The former ( eg Campbells, MacDonalds etc ) have expanded by agglomeration. Comparatively few are related to each other or the main branch of the clan. They are a mixed bag of humanity.
Small clans seem often to be formed of related persons. This is particularly noticeable with small, aristocratic clans like the Percys. Another example are the Mars, Marrs or Erskines. All three surnames are associated with the Earldom of Mar ( the World's oldest title ). Nearly all persons of these surnames are surmised to be related. As I said about the Percys, I've never met a poor one. And that goes for the ones who changed their names as well - like The Smiths' Johnny Marr, who changed his name from ( low class Irish ) Maher to ( aristocratic Scots ) Marr. Instant Surname Privilege !Replies: @Old Palo Altan, @Coemgen, @anonymouslee, @Expletive Deleted
I sort of knew Erskine Bowles (was poised to be a Big Deal at one time) from a country club.
always thought that was an odd name but more fool I
However, grinding through the centuries what's really going to be selective is economic performance. Do you want to marry your really hot/healthy/fertile daughter to the rabbi's boy, or the son of the successfully banker or grain trader? All else even close to equal, my daughter's going with B.
It's actually the economic benefit of IQ that will drive selection--better survival of children, and ergo better mates to have children with.
The Jewish community can through monetary support and bestowing social status drive up the relative standing of the rabbi and appeal of the young rabbis as marriage partners. But it's hard for it to be at the very top in a community that is doing so well in intellectually demanding professions. And then the real breakout of the Jewish community in the last couple hundred years was when they realized the goyim had actually shot by them in intellectual development while they were treading water in their little closed backwater. The folks/families leading the charge to engage with European intellectual developments, were not the rabbinate.Replies: @syonredux, @kaganovitch
Rabbinic and wealthy families were largely the same families for hundreds of years up until emancipation. As it happens, before emancipation and the advent of the “pulpit Rabbi”, the rabbinate was a much more demanding intellectual endeavor which required the mastery of a vast corpus of law and text.
Right, because Asian American life expectancy is going down, and Asian Americans are the object of the white privilege Maoist struggle sessions, and Asian American don’t make as much money as white Americans.
Come on, you are a member of a privileged overclass. Your repeated arguing is nothing more than argument bereft of facts, and devoid of reasoning.
But you have raised an important HBD point about the Percy family, though maybe you were unaware. The best way I can illustrate the point is to contrast them with the Campbell family. The head of the clan is the Duke of Argyll. From the C14th onwards, they expanded rapidly. Some of the clan were blood relative of the Duke, but as they expanded they absorbed clansfolk from other clans, who adopted the name Campbell. By the C17th the latter formed the overwhelming majority of the clan. By this time Campbell was a very common name. Add to that, there are Irish Campbells who have no connection to Scots Campbells whatsoever. Rather like the Scots and Irish Kennedys ( Kennedy is a much more common name in Scotland )
By contrast, the Percy have always been a small Northumbrian clan. The head of the clan was and is the Duke of Northumberland. The Campbells basically tried to take over most of Argyll ( not good if you were a MacDonald ) whereas the Percys remained in the Alnwick-Warkworth area and left the other clans ( Heron, Collingwood, Cuthbert etc ) in place. I suspect that nearly all those born with the Percy surname are related to each other from the Middle Ages onwards. They are not numerous, but I have never met a poor one. They all seem to have affluent lifestyles. Indeed, one of them was even the Councillor of the Ward I lived in. As well as that, they all seemed to have similar discreet, well-mannered characteristics - not what you would expect from relatives of Harry Hotspur.
The differences between" Mass Clans" and small, apparently related clans are often quite sharp. The former ( eg Campbells, MacDonalds etc ) have expanded by agglomeration. Comparatively few are related to each other or the main branch of the clan. They are a mixed bag of humanity.
Small clans seem often to be formed of related persons. This is particularly noticeable with small, aristocratic clans like the Percys. Another example are the Mars, Marrs or Erskines. All three surnames are associated with the Earldom of Mar ( the World's oldest title ). Nearly all persons of these surnames are surmised to be related. As I said about the Percys, I've never met a poor one. And that goes for the ones who changed their names as well - like The Smiths' Johnny Marr, who changed his name from ( low class Irish ) Maher to ( aristocratic Scots ) Marr. Instant Surname Privilege !Replies: @Old Palo Altan, @Coemgen, @anonymouslee, @Expletive Deleted
Percy? Their less-well-provided-for (ox-bothering pedestrian scum) kin claim the names of, among others I believe, Reed (of Redesdale and Otterburn, opposed in perpetuity to the names of Elliot (double L, double T, whatever), and Armstrong (of the Moon), never mind Halls (not particularly dangerous, unlike the aforementioned two). And possibly Charlton (greatest living Englishman).
I remain to be corrected, basically because the northern barbarians are of little consequence, and much of a muchness.
Try Gascoigne or, I dunno, Musgrave, Dacre or Clifford, they’re of a similar vintage and locality, and the descents should map out similarly (relentless gentry interbreeding). Interesting experiment. Do brits fuck about carelessly with their surnames like foreigners do? Inalienable surnames only became a thing apres les Normands, mainly for tax reasons. Only yDNA will provide the answers, I suspect.
But in fact it is perhaps the grandest English name of all, at least once it was transmogrified into "Percy" by the heir to the eponymous estates and, ultimately, the first Duke of Northumberland of the third creation.
And, of course, an illegitimate son of the house gave us the Smithsonian.Replies: @Cortes, @Charles Erwin Wilson
That bastard!
I'm with Nikki Haley who told little Georgie S that she hadn't and wouldn't read it.
Great to see that DJT has told both the UN and Pakistan to go pound sand.Replies: @anon
Fact or fiction, his narrative style is damn riveting. Beware, very unputdownable. I want to read Rupert Murdoch book now.
Also, besides that John Boehner episode, nobody has said one word in rebuttal.
It prompts me to reflect that despite the Famine & pogroms (which were horrific historical experiences) one of the main gripes of Irish Catholic & Jewish communities is that to socially advance they had to assimilate into WASP society in the 19th & 20th centuries.
In those cases assimilation meant giving up a particularly tenaciously held religious-cultural identity that had survived so much and to somehow let it go for societal advancement seemed churlish, almost cowardly. It's interesting that all discrimination simply melted away when these two groups gave up the Pope & the Synagogue so it wasn't really founded on race (an Anglo-Irish was simply a Protestant Irishman).
Finally Jews in Britain & the Irish in America seem much more culturally quiescient than their trans-Atlantic counterparts. That may be because of the preponderance of White identity in the US (which Irish Americans are comfortable with) and English-British in the UK (which British Jews but not the Irish partake in; a historical insult has been "West British").Replies: @Cortes
“Soup takers” is worse.
That was an elite worth the appelation, though I don’t suppose they were much tested…
And it's also the name of Judge Reinhold's character in Fast Times at Ridgemont High.Replies: @ScarletNumber
Umm, way to bury the lede. Jennifer Jason Leigh played Stacey Hamilton.
Stan Laurel's real name was Arthur Stanley Jefferson.Replies: @Cortes
The theatre or music hall (the Britannia Panopticon) in Glasgow’s Trongate, where Laurel made his stage debut, still exists and a band of enthusiasts are gradually reinstating it.
Jefferson Sr owned a couple of music halls in the city during Stan’s childhood.
https://www.britanniapanopticon.org
That would be where their house was. In relation to the administrative center (drunk cleric in a hut).
Up on an escarpment, where they’d cleared out a plot (being remarkably wet and temperate, England was always infested with constantly-encroaching trees, until some bugger invented the iron/steel furnace, and sheep). Also they’d be Saxons, or “Danes” (i.e. weekings), or their ignoble descendants. Not Welsh, Scots, Irish or Flemings.
Backbone of England, and don’t you forget it.
Yep I’m mildly privileged, only to be expected for a Scottish name, wow your Veterans Affairs people are well paid!
More than you might think. During a battle of the Hundred Years War the English army might shoot off ten thousand plus arrows each minute.
An arrow takes a LOT more time to make than a cartridge, especially when made by hand.
Also, it is probable most arrows of the time were made by farmers during the winter slow season. Not necessarily full-time fletchers at all.Replies: @Expletive Deleted
Stringers, Fletchers, Bowman (-men). There’s a quiverfull of those names, and would take some digging, due to dialect changes and the forgetting of trades like the geezers who supplied the (horn) nocks and tips, or the bluebell-root glue for the flights, or the quiver-makers themselves (poss. a side-guild of sadlers, or scabbard-makers).
Just be assured that it was a major trade, on a level with masons or carters. And if it weren’t for them, c’est certain que je vous addresserez-ez-ez en francais (or whatever their monkey-gibber is, correctly).
In The Quiet Man movie Barry Fitzgerald refers to Cohan and specifically says it’s not Cohen!
Just to take the median, since it’s easier:
WASPy names
Eliot $137,000 (n=1)
Winthrop $131,000 (n=3)
Chafee $109,000 (n=1)
Berkeley $98,000 (n=9)
Dana $88,000 (n=38)
Putnam $88,000 (n=77)
Peabody $83,000 (n=22)
Thayer $83,000 (n=44)
Lowell $82,000 (n=23)
Cushing $82,000 (n=29)
Delano $81,000 (n=13)
Forbes $78,000 (n=163)
Morse $78,000 (n=170)
Choate $74,000 (n=34)
Endicott $65,000 (n=14)
Coolidge $46,000 (n=11)
German names
Snyder $80,000 (n=625)
Huffman $77,000 (n=156)
Irish names
Flanagan $93,000 (n=123)
Sweeney $84,000 (n=231)
Callahan $84,000 (n=203)
Doyle $81,000 (n=283)
McGuire $80,000 (n=237)
Black names
Cooks $78,000 (n=75)
Shabazz $77,000 (n=23)
Broadnax $77,000 (n=27)
Boykins $72,000 (n=25)
Gadsden $71,000 (n=17)
Ivery $69,000 (n=14)
Smalls $66,000 (n=73)
Pettaway $65,000 (n=12)
Gadson $65,000 (n=29)
Wigfall $63,000 (n=15)
Fluellen $55,000 (n=12)
I wonder about the restriction of range / selection bias.
-Couch Scientist
Realistically you want to apply some sort of downward pressure to the small sample size surnames, as it's the same basic thing as high ratings in Amazon on small sample sizes. (Of course, Amazon keeps that there to encourage more people to try and rate the highest rated items, as ultimately finding better stuff is what will drive their sales, at the expense of a few guinea pigs who knew what they were getting into.)
Of Irish surnames, my intuition had been that the Daly name punches over its weight. I also felt the same way about Higgins.
Backed up on Daly by the OPM data: 143 Daly feds average 98,788 or +$16,000.
Not so much on the Higgins, a more common Irish name. 314 federal Higgins average $85,526 for a modest factor or +$3000.
Compare to a less common Irish name, that was once Irish-American royalty: Meagher (Thomas Meagher). 21 federal Meaghers averaging $82,532, which is a basically the fed average (factor of 0).
There is a Daly California. It is about as Filipino as Manila. It ALSO happens to contain the HQ of the American branch of the Karaite stream of Jews, who never accepted the new-fangled Talmud. They still go by second Temple rulings from Herod's days.
the people who want to say that today's Jews have nothing-to-do with Judeans of yore, cannot seem to explain away the Karaites. They have an even MORE embarrasment to explain away the Samaritan Jews, who actually never went into diaspora at all. They're still here in their two villages. Well, the western one became engulfed by today's city of Holon, which is really part of Greater Metro Tel Aviv, as far as the bus drivers are concerned.
The Samaritans still sacrifice a lamb at Passover, and use the same pre-Aramaic alphabet that King Solomon collected taxes in.
Between my own name and the regular, non-contractured Johnson: Son of John may be more common than Smith.
Son-of-John is of course, what the women claim, they could well be son-of-robert.
OT–a titbit that might be of marginal interest, (think Matthew Yglesias, polar bear hunting) Conan on living in not-yet-hip Williamsburg, Brooklyn:
0:26 – I was shot several times when I lived there […] I took’em in the shoulder
She is kind of forgotten now since the Kardashians came along (which somehow is about a decade ago by now – they have managed to maintain fame for a long time).
There is also another interesting site that people might be interested in. The U.S. Census Bureau has an Excel spreadsheet that anyone can download showing all surnames that occurred at least 100 times in the 2010 Census, along with the racial distribution of those names:
https://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/2010_surnames.html
Out of curiosity, I checked some of the surnames that have come up on this thread, to see how many people held those names, along with their racial breakdown (I am showing the percentages that are black or white since these constitute most of the people showing these names, but other backgrounds are shown as well):
Cohen – 89,091 people, 88.89% white, 5.97% black
Huntington – 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson – 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson – 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy – 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer – 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro – 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith – 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington – 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% black
Some variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an ‘s’) (5.08% white, 86.34% black).
There's also the curious case that Miranda and Lambert are neighbors (333 and 332).Replies: @James Kabala
But the Irish are white now, so they don't have to use subterfuges like "Mc".Replies: @Dan Hayes
Considering that Soros is an Esperanto name, how do others of that “ethnicity” perform? Are they citizens of the world?
Alan Whicker told a tale about finding a high-performance reichsauto abandoned at Anzio (2nd battle). Wahey! The dog's! Let's go, full Clarkson on the pedal!
Annoyed by its sluggish and gutless response he popped the trunk (boot) and discovered it was encumbered by a very large number of bullion bars, so he britishly turned it in to the top brass (US).
Similar yarns have been relayed to me over many decades, by people who were actually dicking about in mid-forties Europe, busily avoiding their intended fate. I wonder what happened to it all? Gyorgy?
Wife's uncle never found any. Got brewed up by blue-on-blue (US) naval fire while he was farting about in his tank in a coastal town nearby. First action. Them's the breaks.
Thanks, that's all I got for the morning. Try the new Macron post, tastes like frog. Don't forget to tip your host.
Huntington - 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson - 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson - 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy - 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer - 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro - 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith - 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington - 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% blackSome variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an 's') (5.08% white, 86.34% black).Replies: @Steve Sailer, @James Kabala, @Intelligent Dasein, @Reg Cæsar, @James Kabala
Jim Cohen played seven years in the baseball Negro Leagues:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Cohen_(baseball)
Definitely there were a good amount of Dutch Jews involved in trade with the East Indies from the get-go, and some must have settled and assimilated. How the hell else could his name been Cohen?!
I suspect that Italian noble names such as Medici, Sforza, Orisini, Borghese are very rare in the United States. I actually went to college with someone named Medici, but never heard of any of the others here.
3,055 Orsinis, 884 Sforzas, 871 Medicis, 345 Borgheses.Replies: @Anonymous, @prosa123, @Hare Krishna
He ran a pipe and cigar store. Had an absolutely imperious manner about him.
I descend from Schmidts who changed to Smith upon arriving in the 1850s.
Backed up by Indiana Jack’s fascinating link –
3,055 Orsinis, 884 Sforzas, 871 Medicis, 345 Borgheses.
No feds listed for the others.
-Couch Scientist
Huntington - 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson - 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson - 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy - 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer - 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro - 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith - 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington - 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% blackSome variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an 's') (5.08% white, 86.34% black).Replies: @Steve Sailer, @James Kabala, @Intelligent Dasein, @Reg Cæsar, @James Kabala
It is interesting to see how even fairly common surnames (except for the really big ones) have barely enough people to fill a baseball stadium. I thought a mere 55,000 for Jefferson seemed low, but in the vicinity are several other surnames I would have considered fairly common, such as Davenport, Cameron, Hood, Randall, Kirk, Skinner, and Bradford.
In the way that Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly), or the Black Country (contained no Blacks at the time, trust me on this. First lesson: Britain is weird. Always was, always will be. Just close your eyes and relax ...).
Otherwise they wouldn't be called Derbyshire, because it wouldn't make sense.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @YetAnotherAnon, @James Kabala
WASPy names
Eliot $137,000 (n=1)
Winthrop $131,000 (n=3)
Chafee $109,000 (n=1)
Berkeley $98,000 (n=9)
Dana $88,000 (n=38)
Putnam $88,000 (n=77)
Peabody $83,000 (n=22)
Thayer $83,000 (n=44)
Lowell $82,000 (n=23)
Cushing $82,000 (n=29)
Delano $81,000 (n=13)
Forbes $78,000 (n=163)
Morse $78,000 (n=170)
Choate $74,000 (n=34)
Endicott $65,000 (n=14)
Coolidge $46,000 (n=11)
German names
Snyder $80,000 (n=625)
Huffman $77,000 (n=156)
Irish names
Flanagan $93,000 (n=123)
Sweeney $84,000 (n=231)
Callahan $84,000 (n=203)
Doyle $81,000 (n=283)
McGuire $80,000 (n=237)
Black names
Cooks $78,000 (n=75)
Shabazz $77,000 (n=23)
Broadnax $77,000 (n=27)
Boykins $72,000 (n=25)
Gadsden $71,000 (n=17)
Ivery $69,000 (n=14)
Smalls $66,000 (n=73)
Pettaway $65,000 (n=12)
Gadson $65,000 (n=29)
Wigfall $63,000 (n=15)
Fluellen $55,000 (n=12)
I wonder about the restriction of range / selection bias.Replies: @Couch Scientist, @Anonym
True, there is probably a squashing effect. You can probably imagine that the representatives of surnames toward the bottom are probably doing quite well in the eyes of their family members, whereas father Shapiro rolls his eyes at his son’s choice of choosing a career as a top attorney in a federal agency.
Maybe you have already done this, but I would also throw out the zeros because I can’t imagine that OPM uses them in its calculations.
-Couch Scientist
Of course historically literacy levels were much lower. It does make one wonder if those who did know how to read were necessarily the smartest or if a great degree of luck/chance/opportunity was needed.
3,055 Orsinis, 884 Sforzas, 871 Medicis, 345 Borgheses.Replies: @Anonymous, @prosa123, @Hare Krishna
Five federal Medici average, $126,599.60. That’s pretty noble! Even higher than a Shapiro, but of course the sample size is small.
No feds listed for the others.
-Couch Scientist
Schwartz. Prononounced “Fronkenshteen!” Gyorgy Schchchvvarrttartz. Guy’s a reg’lar mystery, like Cap’n Bob Maxwell, or ‘Tiny’ Rowland. Or the “Belgian widow” who funded Tony Blair and friend Mandelson.
Alan Whicker told a tale about finding a high-performance reichsauto abandoned at Anzio (2nd battle). Wahey! The dog’s! Let’s go, full Clarkson on the pedal!
Annoyed by its sluggish and gutless response he popped the trunk (boot) and discovered it was encumbered by a very large number of bullion bars, so he britishly turned it in to the top brass (US).
Similar yarns have been relayed to me over many decades, by people who were actually dicking about in mid-forties Europe, busily avoiding their intended fate. I wonder what happened to it all? Gyorgy?
Wife’s uncle never found any. Got brewed up by blue-on-blue (US) naval fire while he was farting about in his tank in a coastal town nearby. First action. Them’s the breaks.
I knew an Orsini years ago who looked just like the Orsini pope, Benedict XIII .
He ran a pipe and cigar store. Had an absolutely imperious manner about him.
Huntington - 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson - 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson - 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy - 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer - 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro - 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith - 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington - 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% blackSome variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an 's') (5.08% white, 86.34% black).Replies: @Steve Sailer, @James Kabala, @Intelligent Dasein, @Reg Cæsar, @James Kabala
There’s some funny juxtapositions on that list. For instance, what are the odds that Mason and Dixon would end up right next to each other (169 and 170)?
There’s also the curious case that Miranda and Lambert are neighbors (333 and 332).
Huntington - 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson - 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson - 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy - 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer - 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro - 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith - 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington - 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% blackSome variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an 's') (5.08% white, 86.34% black).Replies: @Steve Sailer, @James Kabala, @Intelligent Dasein, @Reg Cæsar, @James Kabala
White Washingtons are unusual enough that I had to see how Hollywood lyricist Ned Washington got the name. Turns out his grandfather emigrated from Ireland. I doubt “Washington” was his name over there.
But the Irish are white now, so they don’t have to use subterfuges like “Mc”.
I've got news for you. The Irish were always white!Replies: @International Jew, @Reg Cæsar
Hamilton is the most distinguished aristocratic name in Scotland - two dukedoms, two earldoms, a viscountcy, two baronies, three baronetcies, and four families of the landed gentry; all this without counting the extinct titles.
I would wager then that something like 90% of the Oxford and Cambridge graduates bearing this name were scions of one or another of these families.Replies: @Alden
A countess of Huntington was the financial and political backer of John Wesley.
3,055 Orsinis, 884 Sforzas, 871 Medicis, 345 Borgheses.Replies: @Anonymous, @prosa123, @Hare Krishna
I’ve known people named Orsini and Borghese.
Sharma: 133K (count 171), US + 50K
Varma/Verma: 133K (65), US + 50K
Gupta: 212K (129), US + 129K
Das*: 130K (77), US + 47KReplies: @rec1man
I ran Iyer ( Tamil Brahmin )
count 26
Average = 144k
Max = $318 K
I remain to be corrected, basically because the northern barbarians are of little consequence, and much of a muchness.
Try Gascoigne or, I dunno, Musgrave, Dacre or Clifford, they're of a similar vintage and locality, and the descents should map out similarly (relentless gentry interbreeding). Interesting experiment. Do brits fuck about carelessly with their surnames like foreigners do? Inalienable surnames only became a thing apres les Normands, mainly for tax reasons. Only yDNA will provide the answers, I suspect.Replies: @Alden
Didn’t the northern barbarians keep the even more barbaric Scots away from the midlands and south?
Usually they only get as far as Manchester or Derby. Then they're sent back to Newcastle or Carlisle to die in prison.
Notoriously, the statutes in a number of northern towns requiring citizens to kill any Scot found (within the city walls/above the hightide mark/carrying bow and arrow/drunk in a horsetrough) after dark have never been struck down. Apparently post-Enlightenment legislation prohibiting random murder supersedes these wise and ancient laws.
But the Irish are white now, so they don't have to use subterfuges like "Mc".Replies: @Dan Hayes
Reg Caesar:
I’ve got news for you. The Irish were always white!
Davenport and Kirk are very Lancashire, and almost certainly Salford Hundred. Kirks in Bolton/Bury area, D’ports to the SW. Bradfords are from anywhere except Bradford (Yorks). But not too far away.
In the way that Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly), or the Black Country (contained no Blacks at the time, trust me on this. First lesson: Britain is weird. Always was, always will be. Just close your eyes and relax …).
Otherwise they wouldn’t be called Derbyshire, because it wouldn’t make sense.
Isn't that because the Earl of Derby owned great chunks of Lancashire, just as great chunks of Derbyshire are still owned by the Duke of Devonshire?
There are some Asians living in America Activists websites and organizations that weep and wail about how oppressed they are. They also sue the government for more affirmative action jobs and benefits.
Of course they mostly agitate on behalf of Hmongs , Cambodians and others who’ve been on welfare for generations.
But you should find those organizations.
Commenting on random websites that Asians living in America are discriminated against won’t help your cause. Find and join an Asians living in America Activist group.
In the way that Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly), or the Black Country (contained no Blacks at the time, trust me on this. First lesson: Britain is weird. Always was, always will be. Just close your eyes and relax ...).
Otherwise they wouldn't be called Derbyshire, because it wouldn't make sense.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @YetAnotherAnon, @James Kabala
Is the pattern kind of like how nobody is called “Tex” in Texas?
count 26
Average = 144k
Max = $318 KReplies: @anon
Still 68K less than Gupta, though Iyers are probably among the most learned. After all Indian Billionaires are mostly Parsis, Marwaris and Gujaratis. Goes to show business beats scholarship?
Surnames that have a lot of overlap between blacks and whites would skew the result toward less surname privilege since blacks tend to earn less. This would be particularly true on a list of government employee surnames since blacks are dramatically overrepresented in government workers.Replies: @Lurker, @syonredux, @Alden, @Kevin in Ohio, @gregor, @ScarletNumber, @G Pinfold, @ScarletNumber
Here is one from when jokebooks were popular:
What did George Washington and Thomas Jefferson have in common?
They were the last white people to have these names.
Ten years ago ancestry.com traced the Washington family genealogy to see who would be king of America had the U.S.A. become a hereditary monarch under George Washington after the Revolution. They found that the most likely candidate was Paul Emery Washington (since deceased) of San Antonio, Texas:
https://blogs.ancestry.com/cm/king-of-america-who-would-be-washingtons-heir/
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27075856/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/texan-george-washingtons-closest-kin/#.WlPCuK5Ku1s
Younger sons had career options in the church, the military, and after a point, in the law. One might become a clergyman because he was a poor physical specimen and not fit to be a soldier; such was the case with Talleyrand, who was lamed in an accident at the age of four, and made a churchman (becoming bishop of Autun in 1789, just as revolution was about to break out).
If an heir died leaving a priest next in line to titles and estates, it was not uncommon that he might be dispensed of his vows so that he might succeed to them. An example of this was Cesare Borgia, made archbishop of Valencia in 1492 and a cardinal in 1493. When his brother Giovanni died in 1497 (some say with "assistance" from his younger brother), Cesare sought release from his vows and renounced his cardinalate in 1498, to become Duke of Valentinois, gonfalonier and captain-general of the Holy Roman Church.
Monks and nuns present a different picture. Monasteries and convents supplied the mediaeval equivalent of social welfare services, finding accommodation and work for those who could get it nowhere else. Most such persons were not priests or even under religious vows, but worked on the estates belonging to religious institutions. However, some were admitted as serving brothers or sisters. Nunneries also functioned as homes for unmarriageable women - typically unmarriageable because their fathers could not afford dowries. Often they were sent to nunneries against their wishes, as in the lyrics of a well-known song of the period:
Une jeune fillette
de noble coeur,
Plaisante et joliette
de grand' valeur,
Outre son gré on l'a rendu nonnette
Cela point ne luy haicte
dont vit en grand' douleur...Replies: @International Jew, @Anonymous
Interesting, thanks. So, bottom line, would you say Christian societies of the time selected for intelligence, or against it?
Sure, but that won’t select for intelligence unless (1) your siblings also have the intelligence gene(s) and your being a priest or monk somehow helps your siblings have more kids than they would otherwise have.
In those days, when almost everyone was poor, if you were an untalented head-in-the-clouds kind of guy, you’d starve. In fact, without some external source of support, or your own ability to work at a high enough rate of pay to enable you to survive working just part-time, you wouldn’t have had the spare time to undertake the course of study that would gain you the rabbi degree (called smicha).
No, you can only carry so much porridge.
Usually they only get as far as Manchester or Derby. Then they’re sent back to Newcastle or Carlisle to die in prison.
Notoriously, the statutes in a number of northern towns requiring citizens to kill any Scot found (within the city walls/above the hightide mark/carrying bow and arrow/drunk in a horsetrough) after dark have never been struck down. Apparently post-Enlightenment legislation prohibiting random murder supersedes these wise and ancient laws.
I've got news for you. The Irish were always white!Replies: @International Jew, @Reg Cæsar
Reg Cæsar forgets to include the tag, now and then.
WASPy names
Eliot $137,000 (n=1)
Winthrop $131,000 (n=3)
Chafee $109,000 (n=1)
Berkeley $98,000 (n=9)
Dana $88,000 (n=38)
Putnam $88,000 (n=77)
Peabody $83,000 (n=22)
Thayer $83,000 (n=44)
Lowell $82,000 (n=23)
Cushing $82,000 (n=29)
Delano $81,000 (n=13)
Forbes $78,000 (n=163)
Morse $78,000 (n=170)
Choate $74,000 (n=34)
Endicott $65,000 (n=14)
Coolidge $46,000 (n=11)
German names
Snyder $80,000 (n=625)
Huffman $77,000 (n=156)
Irish names
Flanagan $93,000 (n=123)
Sweeney $84,000 (n=231)
Callahan $84,000 (n=203)
Doyle $81,000 (n=283)
McGuire $80,000 (n=237)
Black names
Cooks $78,000 (n=75)
Shabazz $77,000 (n=23)
Broadnax $77,000 (n=27)
Boykins $72,000 (n=25)
Gadsden $71,000 (n=17)
Ivery $69,000 (n=14)
Smalls $66,000 (n=73)
Pettaway $65,000 (n=12)
Gadson $65,000 (n=29)
Wigfall $63,000 (n=15)
Fluellen $55,000 (n=12)
I wonder about the restriction of range / selection bias.Replies: @Couch Scientist, @Anonym
Has someone with more time than me written a Perl script or the like to go through a dictionary of surnames and get the number, mean and median salary of all of these surnames?
Realistically you want to apply some sort of downward pressure to the small sample size surnames, as it’s the same basic thing as high ratings in Amazon on small sample sizes. (Of course, Amazon keeps that there to encourage more people to try and rate the highest rated items, as ultimately finding better stuff is what will drive their sales, at the expense of a few guinea pigs who knew what they were getting into.)
Guess so.
“Look here, it’s Li’l Slim back from the hills of Tennessee!”
“It’s Tex now, you sumbitch.”
did you ever square dance? Maybe your kids learned square dancing in school. Like many other Americans of your vintage, you may be part of an unwitting experiment.
https://qz.com/1153516/americas-wholesome-square-dancing-tradition-is-a-tool-of-white-supremacy/Replies: @Steve Sailer, @guest
They were still teaching me square dancing after the Long March Through the Institutions. The Boomer Generation certainly didn’t enjoy folk music because of its whiteness. Rather, they like it in spite of its whiteness. Or at least that part of it which is white in origin. Funnily enough, the Fords of the world made a lot of mistakes, and attributed un-white music to whites.
Henry Ford, by the way, was influential and did promote Americana for partially racist reasons. He was also never part of the Establishment, though his foundation was. The Establishment made fun of him, including in a rather embarrassing visit to the witness stand. If educrats were pushing square dancing instruction in the 70s and 80s, rest assured it was NOT because of Ford.
Why did they, then? Well, our school system feeds the fire under the melting pot. They love synthetic culture, including propping up dead culture. Persistent popular dance forms don’t need to be taught in school. You can go somewhere to learn the fox-trot, Charleston, swing, and other forms associated with jazz. You can also go learn to waltz and polka, two white dance forms that don’t get taught in school.
Square dancing and line dancing may be taught in barns and honky-tonks in certain parts of the country. I wouldn’t know. But most people will never encounter them in real life. Not counting that one line routine people do at wedding receptions. So there’s a purpose to teaching them in school.
I’m one of those weirdos who doesn’t necessarily hold malign origins* against something, if it’s valuable. Which may or may not be the case with square dancing. But the simple fact that it was promoted due to racism doesn’t have to be no thang. So was birth control, among other things in which good Current Year citizens believe.
By the way, I like a lot of jazz, but I’m not crazy about the style of dance associated with it. I watch Jane Austen costume dramas sometimes and wonder, “Why don’t we do that instead of gyrating like the possessed?”
*Not that preserving white culture for the sake of whiteness is a bad thing.
It was hell. We spent an entire quarter of the school year doing that. All I could do was bear the burden stoically and wait for the time to pass by.
Apart from the fact that I wasn't technically starving to death or sleeping in frozen, lice-infested bunkers, I've never felt public school to be much different from being in the gulag.
Steve, the most famous Shapiro is/was Tokyo Shapiro. I tell ya I got some dynamite deals on stereo equipment from that Japanese Jew in the late eighties. Dynamite!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.htmlReplies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @guest, @anon
Well, that’s one thing alt-righters would have in common with the people around whose names they put parentheses.
Jonathan was writing about Huntingdon, England, and being jocular about the related Bostons and Cambridges.
There is a Hunting(t)on Avenue in Boston, MA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huntington_Avenue
This was probably an attempt to give a social upgrade to the renowned socialist who robbed from the rich and gave to the poor, a quaint notion that predates the modern tendency to reverse the process.
The current Earl of Huntingdon is William Edward Robin Hood Hastings-Bass, 17th Earl of Huntingdon, who came from a family of wealthy racehorse trainers and trained horses for the Queen. Since his retirement he has taken part in charity work, driving a truckload of supplies to Bosnia and taking part in bike ride across Borneo and a safari in the Australian outback.Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
If you recall the legend, what Robin did was not to “rob from the rich and give to the poor,” but to rob the ill-gotten loot of the usurper Prince John’s tax collectors, and give it back to the people from whom they had exacted it.
The claim that Robin was Earl of Huntingdon, or received the title from Richard the Lionhearted upon the latter’s return from his crusade, is of course false. The earldom was held during all of this period by Henry, brother of William the Lion of Scotland. It had been one of the Scottish royal family’s possessions in England intermittently throughout the twelfth century.
There is often a bit of genuine but garbled history buried in legends. Thus, for example, the Siegfried and Brunnhilde of the Nibelungenlied probably reflect the Merovingian Sigebert and his wife, the Visigothic princess Brunehaut. If we are to look for some historical events in the background to the Robin Hood legend, they might have arisen after the accession of John as King of England and in the period of rebellion before Magna Carta was forced upon the King by his barons.
In 1209, John compelled William the Lion, King of Scots and ci-devant Earl of Huntingdon, elder brother of the then incumbent Earl, to give two of his daughters in marriage to English barons. One of these barons was Robert de Ros, Baron of Helmsley. De Ros later joined the rebellion against John and was one of the Magna Carta sureties.
Robin was a common nickname for Robert – could the rebellious Robert de Ros, married to a Scottish royal who was niece of the Earl of Huntingdon, be the origin of the legend that Robin Hood was Earl of Huntingdon?
Henry Ford, by the way, was influential and did promote Americana for partially racist reasons. He was also never part of the Establishment, though his foundation was. The Establishment made fun of him, including in a rather embarrassing visit to the witness stand. If educrats were pushing square dancing instruction in the 70s and 80s, rest assured it was NOT because of Ford.
Why did they, then? Well, our school system feeds the fire under the melting pot. They love synthetic culture, including propping up dead culture. Persistent popular dance forms don't need to be taught in school. You can go somewhere to learn the fox-trot, Charleston, swing, and other forms associated with jazz. You can also go learn to waltz and polka, two white dance forms that don't get taught in school.
Square dancing and line dancing may be taught in barns and honky-tonks in certain parts of the country. I wouldn't know. But most people will never encounter them in real life. Not counting that one line routine people do at wedding receptions. So there's a purpose to teaching them in school.
I'm one of those weirdos who doesn't necessarily hold malign origins* against something, if it's valuable. Which may or may not be the case with square dancing. But the simple fact that it was promoted due to racism doesn't have to be no thang. So was birth control, among other things in which good Current Year citizens believe.
By the way, I like a lot of jazz, but I'm not crazy about the style of dance associated with it. I watch Jane Austen costume dramas sometimes and wonder, "Why don't we do that instead of gyrating like the possessed?"
*Not that preserving white culture for the sake of whiteness is a bad thing.Replies: @Anonymous, @Intelligent Dasein
I did a contract job (it was installing an IT system, not bumping someone off for the Amish Mafia) in an ag equipment plant in Indiana in the nineties. On alternate Sundays part of final assembly was cleared out for square dance practice groups. Several people in the plant were square dancers or dance callers.
I can almost see your (deleted) expletives! Maybe there are returning Tex-patriates who are exceptions to the rule:
“Look here, it’s Li’l Slim back from the hills of Tennessee!”
“It’s Tex now, you sumbitch.”
Courtiers were certainly selected for intelligence. Look at Castiglione’s book. A man who hoped to succeed at court had to have at least the military skills of a junior officer of cavalry, or equivalent diplomatic and lawyerly abilities; to know several languages in addition to his native tongue, to be able to turn out a respectable sonnet, to read music well enough to sing a part, and possibly to play the lute or the viol. He in addition to all of this had to know enough heraldry to recognize a nobleman by his coat-armour, and to possess sufficient social graces to be presentable in polite society.
The more exacting trades also required both intelligence and learned skill. Christophe Plantin, the famous printer of 16th-c. Antwerp, was probably the first man to become truly wealthy as a publisher. He required his compositors to know Latin, Greek, and one vulgar tongue apart from their native languages. This was, of course, in addition to knowing the lay of the type case, how to set up properly justified pages, and how to make up formes. There’s a combination of skills that I suspect very few people could boast today.
The Plantin-Moretus family eventually went into banking and were ennobled as viscounts. I believe there may still be descendants.
Backed up on Daly by the OPM data: 143 Daly feds average 98,788 or +$16,000.
Not so much on the Higgins, a more common Irish name. 314 federal Higgins average $85,526 for a modest factor or +$3000.
Compare to a less common Irish name, that was once Irish-American royalty: Meagher (Thomas Meagher). 21 federal Meaghers averaging $82,532, which is a basically the fed average (factor of 0).Replies: @Karl, @Travis
217 Couch Scientist > Backed up on Daly
There is a Daly California. It is about as Filipino as Manila. It ALSO happens to contain the HQ of the American branch of the Karaite stream of Jews, who never accepted the new-fangled Talmud. They still go by second Temple rulings from Herod’s days.
the people who want to say that today’s Jews have nothing-to-do with Judeans of yore, cannot seem to explain away the Karaites. They have an even MORE embarrasment to explain away the Samaritan Jews, who actually never went into diaspora at all. They’re still here in their two villages. Well, the western one became engulfed by today’s city of Holon, which is really part of Greater Metro Tel Aviv, as far as the bus drivers are concerned.
The Samaritans still sacrifice a lamb at Passover, and use the same pre-Aramaic alphabet that King Solomon collected taxes in.
3,055 Orsinis, 884 Sforzas, 871 Medicis, 345 Borgheses.Replies: @Anonymous, @prosa123, @Hare Krishna
How many Viscontis?
Any statistical as opposed to anecdotal evidence?
Eh.
Since they would be the siblings of a person with an above average IQ, they would almost certainly also have above average IQs. And, since IQ has a strong hereditary aspect, they would pass those genes on to their children. Remember, if a guy is 6’6, odds are that his siblings will also be of above average height…..The same thing holds for IQ…..
And being the sibling of a monk/priest certainly isn’t going to hinder their reproductive chances…..
By “sitting around,” I’m referring to reading a lot of useless religious texts. So, sure, our wannabe-rabbi has to work to put himself through his course of study….but it’s sheer necessity. His pleasure comes from sitting around reading nonsense……So, probably not a guy with a lot of get-up-and-go…..My Ashkenazi grandfather used to love to tell stories about lazy rabbis….
Belzebubo
In the way that Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly), or the Black Country (contained no Blacks at the time, trust me on this. First lesson: Britain is weird. Always was, always will be. Just close your eyes and relax ...).
Otherwise they wouldn't be called Derbyshire, because it wouldn't make sense.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @YetAnotherAnon, @James Kabala
“Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly)”
Isn’t that because the Earl of Derby owned great chunks of Lancashire, just as great chunks of Derbyshire are still owned by the Duke of Devonshire?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/01/07/tributes-pour-former-goldman-bp-chair-peter-sutherland-dies/
Not many tributes in the comments!
Of course, these things can become updated. Did you know that one reputable dictionary (it might be the Oxford) now accepts that literally can mean metaphorically because it is a common usage. When I heard that, I was literally gobsmacked.Replies: @Anonymous
This is a good illustration of what dictionaries are about. They describe how people use (and misuse) a language, and nothing gets lexicographers more excited than being the first one to document the latest solecism.
Duos like literally/figuratively and nauseous/nauseating are particularly disappointing because the result is that we no longer have words which mean what the former of each of those pairs used to mean. There are many such examples and one effect is that our ability to think about things is actually diminished.
And although it's not the same kind of "duo", I notice an increasing tendency for people to use brutalized to mean "brutally treated" rather than "turned into a brute".Replies: @Dissident, @ScarletNumber
I am not aware if Italian names bear any relation to social status/origins. Any Italians know?
As a very general rule Italian names that end in -i tend to be northern, and higher social status than names that end in -o,-a, -e which are southern. So Rossi, Bianchi, Ferrari are generally higher achieving than Russo, Ferraro or De Rosa.
Also – Agnelli, Prodi, Visconti, Rossellini and Renzi are better names than Bonanno, Colombo, Gambino, Genovese und Lucchese.
A “smith” was originally someone who forged, then later fashioned, things using a hammer. A prefix (e.g. “black-“, “gold”-, “wood”-) then indicated what materials he worked on. Something similar happened with the term “wright”. A wright was simply a workman, one who did not necessarily use a hammer, but later the distinction between a smith and a wright became blurred (e.g. a “wheelwright” should more properly have been called a “wheelsmith”).
According to Skeat, “smith” originates in a lost verb meaning “to forge”, while “wright” is related to “work”. Another form of that word is the adjective “wrought”, as in “wrought iron” – which should of course be “smithed iron”!
Also with reference to a lack of federal employees named Laquisha as mentioned in a post above, I believe the name is more commonly spelled either as Lakeisha or as Lakesha, and, surprisingly to me, it is also used as a white name. Actually I know a white Lakesha.
The problem with made-up names is that if you are uneducated, you may well given your child the name of an unpleasant disease without knowing it. It has always baffled me that there is a chain of shoe stores called The Athletes Foot, apparently oblivious of the fact, or perhaps because of the fact that athlete's foot is a fungal infection that grows between the toes.
Of course it all depends where you are. In England I once met an American man called Randolph Hornblower, who said that in the US everyone called him "Horny". It was a relief for him to arrive in Britain where people asked him if he was "Randy".Replies: @syonredux, @Anonymous
Sounds like you have not yet seen Shirley Q’s “Who is my baby daddy” in which case you are are in for a heck of a treat.
Too bad the smartest Roman Catholics were sworn to celibacy.
That doesn’t mean they didn’t have children. Celibacy may have had a dysgenic effect in countries like Ireland or Spain where they took their vows seriously but not in Italy. Chaucer, Boccaccio, and even Martin Luther seem to have all agreed that in the late Middle Ages Priests and Monks were getting their rocks off probably more often than peasants.
Younger sons had career options in the church, the military, and after a point, in the law. One might become a clergyman because he was a poor physical specimen and not fit to be a soldier; such was the case with Talleyrand, who was lamed in an accident at the age of four, and made a churchman (becoming bishop of Autun in 1789, just as revolution was about to break out).
If an heir died leaving a priest next in line to titles and estates, it was not uncommon that he might be dispensed of his vows so that he might succeed to them. An example of this was Cesare Borgia, made archbishop of Valencia in 1492 and a cardinal in 1493. When his brother Giovanni died in 1497 (some say with "assistance" from his younger brother), Cesare sought release from his vows and renounced his cardinalate in 1498, to become Duke of Valentinois, gonfalonier and captain-general of the Holy Roman Church.
Monks and nuns present a different picture. Monasteries and convents supplied the mediaeval equivalent of social welfare services, finding accommodation and work for those who could get it nowhere else. Most such persons were not priests or even under religious vows, but worked on the estates belonging to religious institutions. However, some were admitted as serving brothers or sisters. Nunneries also functioned as homes for unmarriageable women - typically unmarriageable because their fathers could not afford dowries. Often they were sent to nunneries against their wishes, as in the lyrics of a well-known song of the period:
Une jeune fillette
de noble coeur,
Plaisante et joliette
de grand' valeur,
Outre son gré on l'a rendu nonnette
Cela point ne luy haicte
dont vit en grand' douleur...Replies: @International Jew, @Anonymous
Your writing style is a balm to my wounded spirit. ‘Twas Society what done that, and I’m greatly obliged for the relief.
Say what you will about Donald John Trump, he’s a billionaire, and he only had a few million handed to him.
Except that is simply not true. He is not a billionaire and his net worth today is about what he inherited, adjusted for inflation. For the past two decades he has been viewed as a joke by people who actually make money in real estate. That is a fact. Trump has one virtue – he is strong on immigration. He has no other virtues, but maybe at this point in history that one virtue is enough.
Alas, since Hart-Celler those are the only people we do let in. Something just a tad perverse about that.
Come on, you are a member of a privileged overclass. Your repeated arguing is nothing more than argument bereft of facts, and devoid of reasoning.Replies: @Anonymous
Pretty much the same thing as with the chosenites, and just look how well it’s worked out for them! Makes sense that Asians would seek to emulate the most privileged subgroup in the nation, and Asians are very good at copying.
This also explains why Jews in charge of Ivy League admissions might seek to limit the flood of Asian applicants. Any further increase is likely to come at the expense of Jews themselves, since Anglo types have been reduced down to a select few athletes along with a tiny number of legacies. Because most legacies are now Jewish too.
Everything you wrote before “that is a fact” is inaccurate, and in your short list of virtues you neglected AFFH just this week, and the fact that the man delivers continuous angina to our enemies.
I don't consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America's real enemies - China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn't have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.Replies: @Coemgen, @Anonymous, @International Jew, @Dissident
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/alt-right-asian-fetish.htmlReplies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous, @guest, @anon
Never paid attention to Andrew Anglin– he has remarkably asian-looking eyes for a white guy.
My last name was once a name of privilege perhaps, no impediment even for many a Jewish lass years ago. Not sure if the same ‘pop’ comes from the last name Christian these days as many years ago. My Pop was Federal, he was in the GS teens, 14 or 15 back then, don’t remember where. Since, you’d need a Masters to reach that. Not sure if that’s tip-top for the name..
There are many British surnames that are though to have come from roles played in pageants or local connections, some of which are religious, or appear religious, for example Abbey, Abbot, Dean, Saint, St. John, Pope, Bishop, Priest, Priestley, Pilgrim, Canon, Church, Kirk, Pew, Bell, Cross, Graves, King, Queen, Lord, Earl, Duke, Squires.
Of course many Christian names became surnames in the next generations, such as Peters, Matthews, Johnson, and so on.Replies: @Jim Christian
Is there some appropriation going on?
What about Coben?
In the way that Darbysheers (our noble friend J Derbyshire for example), are not from Co. Derby, but also heavily Lancs (Worsley/Eccles mostly), or the Black Country (contained no Blacks at the time, trust me on this. First lesson: Britain is weird. Always was, always will be. Just close your eyes and relax ...).
Otherwise they wouldn't be called Derbyshire, because it wouldn't make sense.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @YetAnotherAnon, @James Kabala
The Black Belt of Alabama is likewise so-called because of the soil, but (for obvious reasons) it also eventually became full of black people.
John Kerry also turned out to be really a Kohn.
There's also the curious case that Miranda and Lambert are neighbors (333 and 332).Replies: @James Kabala
I don’t remember any facts about songwriter Carole Bayer Sager other than that she exists, but her names are also back to back (3389 and 3390). I wonder if she ever wrote for Julio Iglesias. (Iglesias is just ahead, tied for 3387 with Hiller.)
They want you to think "unearned privilege" when you hear "privilege," which is a dirty trick. Much like with "racism,"--which combines the desire to throw all members of a despised race into gas chambers with innocuously noticing people of a certain color are better at basketball--it's a slippery term. You can't pin them down.Replies: @scrivener3
Even more insidious, they are claiming if a group does better, it must be due to privilege. Sometimes underprivileged groups do better,
It’s disparate impact applied to everything in life. If anyone or group does better it is because they have an unfair advantage.
Huntington - 7,306 people, 88.17% white, 4.24% black
Jackson - 708,099 people, 39.89% white, 53.04% black
Jefferson - 55,179 people, 17.45% white, 74.24% black
Percy - 4,226 people, 67.49% white, 21.77% black
Sailer - 2,520 people, 93.61% white, 0.79% black
Shapiro - 24,335 people, 96.05% white, 0.35% black
Smith - 2,442,977 people, 70.9% white, 23.11% black (the most common surname)
Washington - 177,386 people, 5.17% white, 87.53% blackSome variations of these names are also interesting. For example, there were 159 McWashingtons in the 2010 Census (4.4% white, 86.16% black). There were also 571 people reporting the last name Cohens (with an 's') (5.08% white, 86.34% black).Replies: @Steve Sailer, @James Kabala, @Intelligent Dasein, @Reg Cæsar, @James Kabala
It is interesting to put in surnames known mainly because of one celebrity and learn just how rare they are. We have 183 Malkoviches, 146 Zellwegers, and 109 Vonneguts. Names that fail to hit 100 at all include Belichick, Kardashian, and both Sajak and Trebek (of course the latter is really from Canada).
There are 3,886 Trumps. Trump's ancestral surname of Drumpf does not make 100.
What do Washington, Jefferson, Jackson and Lincoln have in common?
The last white guys with those names.
Simon>Percy (Wikipedia)
“In 2006, writing about the influence of political lobbies on the U.S. relationship with Israel, political theorists John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt wrote that they believed Percy’s loss was the result of a campaign waged against him by the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).[19] The lobbying group controlled substantial monies and helped lawmakers who they believed supported the security of Israel.”
None of those was him, as he was on the road during the census, on a series against the Toledo Mudhens. Those hits were from another small subset of COBS-kids, the poor bastards.
Well, hell, I assumed you erudite folks on here would just know what that meant. I guess we can’t all be hip to the current health-care terminology.
C.O.B.S. = Children Of Bad Spellers
/pre-emptive reply
the fact that the man delivers continuous angina to our enemies.
I don’t consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America’s real enemies – China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn’t have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.
On the subject of "attacks"--the politically motivated violence since Trump was elected has been overwhelmingly leftists attacking non-leftists.
-----------In response to your exchange with the Anonymous who had praised President Trump for "the fact that the man delivers continuous angina to our enemies.", a statement to which you took exception, I say the following.I want a President to be hated and feared by Cultural Marxists; SJWs and Sanctimonious Goodwhites; war-mongering Globalists; brazenly buggering, disease-promoting degenerates*; and all other pernicious, noxious, corrosive and predatory vermin. I do not want a President to indulge in pissing contests and other vulgar, unseemly, puerile antics that are often gratuitously and excessively malicious and always pointless.*Graphic content
There’ll be some variants from the Southern states, with the corrupted form “Belsebubba”. Most of them work at auto junkyards, not the government, though.
Henry Ford, by the way, was influential and did promote Americana for partially racist reasons. He was also never part of the Establishment, though his foundation was. The Establishment made fun of him, including in a rather embarrassing visit to the witness stand. If educrats were pushing square dancing instruction in the 70s and 80s, rest assured it was NOT because of Ford.
Why did they, then? Well, our school system feeds the fire under the melting pot. They love synthetic culture, including propping up dead culture. Persistent popular dance forms don't need to be taught in school. You can go somewhere to learn the fox-trot, Charleston, swing, and other forms associated with jazz. You can also go learn to waltz and polka, two white dance forms that don't get taught in school.
Square dancing and line dancing may be taught in barns and honky-tonks in certain parts of the country. I wouldn't know. But most people will never encounter them in real life. Not counting that one line routine people do at wedding receptions. So there's a purpose to teaching them in school.
I'm one of those weirdos who doesn't necessarily hold malign origins* against something, if it's valuable. Which may or may not be the case with square dancing. But the simple fact that it was promoted due to racism doesn't have to be no thang. So was birth control, among other things in which good Current Year citizens believe.
By the way, I like a lot of jazz, but I'm not crazy about the style of dance associated with it. I watch Jane Austen costume dramas sometimes and wonder, "Why don't we do that instead of gyrating like the possessed?"
*Not that preserving white culture for the sake of whiteness is a bad thing.Replies: @Anonymous, @Intelligent Dasein
I was made to do square dancing and line dancing in my gym class in junior high in the mid ’90s.
It was hell. We spent an entire quarter of the school year doing that. All I could do was bear the burden stoically and wait for the time to pass by.
Apart from the fact that I wasn’t technically starving to death or sleeping in frozen, lice-infested bunkers, I’ve never felt public school to be much different from being in the gulag.
Yes, and lots of them are dual citizens. at that. They carry another passport to their other homeland down below.
Thanks, that’s all I got for the morning. Try the new Macron post, tastes like frog. Don’t forget to tip your host.
Isn’t the HBD explanation for Ashkenazi achievement that 1) there was a founding event during which the Ashkenazim became 50/50 Semites and northern Europeans and 2) then they were bred for intelligence for 1000 years? The story is that the smart genes came from the northern Europeans (or maybe from hybrid vigor) and then were selected for. Palestinian Jews aren’t particularly bright. So, walling off a sub-population from further admixture seems not especially likely to be an IQ-enhancing thing. Also, it seems like the effects would be very small since the in-migrating genes only have to wait a generation or two to migrate into the Cohens and since in-migrating European genes were not much of a thing post-founding-event anyway. So, seems consistent to me.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.3711&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence#"Natural_History_of_Ashkenazi_Intelligence"Replies: @Bill, @Anon
There are 159 Obamas. (Are they all authentic Kenyans, or could some be eccentrics/fanatics who changed their names? It would be interesting to compare with the 2000 census.)
There are 3,886 Trumps. Trump’s ancestral surname of Drumpf does not make 100.
In Britain it was common until fairly recently to refer to first names as Christian names even if the person concerned was not a christian–the term had no more religious connotation than terms like Act of God. Traditional large numbers of British people have had first names found in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, plus the names of saints like St. George, St. Margaret, and so on.
There are many British surnames that are though to have come from roles played in pageants or local connections, some of which are religious, or appear religious, for example Abbey, Abbot, Dean, Saint, St. John, Pope, Bishop, Priest, Priestley, Pilgrim, Canon, Church, Kirk, Pew, Bell, Cross, Graves, King, Queen, Lord, Earl, Duke, Squires.
Of course many Christian names became surnames in the next generations, such as Peters, Matthews, Johnson, and so on.
What about the silent P in “swimming”? (!!!!) (Rim-shot.)
I don't consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America's real enemies - China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn't have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.Replies: @Coemgen, @Anonymous, @International Jew, @Dissident
Trump is playing with the hand he’s been dealt against a fanatically ideological faction–that half of 120+ I.Q. types–who despise “half” of U.S. citizens. Those ideologues are greasing the skids for our “real enemies” to slide on in and take whatever they wish from U.S. citizens. If Trump has an unconventional way of dealing with the ideologues; at least he is trying to deal with them. He also needs the support of 90% of U.S. Citizens who are not 120+ I.Q. elitist ideologues. For that end, he needs to express himself in terms the 90% understand. If that gives some people the vapors, well, that may be a feature not a bug.
On the subject of “attacks”–the politically motivated violence since Trump was elected has been overwhelmingly leftists attacking non-leftists.
I don't consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America's real enemies - China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn't have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.Replies: @Coemgen, @Anonymous, @International Jew, @Dissident
You have a point; both us know that Trump isn’t capable of that kind of enlightened leadership. Still I love the apoplexy he causes. They can’t even, but I can 🙂
Nice to see my French Canadian confreres are underachieving per usual.
As a very general rule Italian names that end in -i tend to be northern, and higher social status than names that end in -o,-a, -e which are southern. So Rossi, Bianchi, Ferrari are generally higher achieving than Russo, Ferraro or De Rosa.
Also - Agnelli, Prodi, Visconti, Rossellini and Renzi are better names than Bonanno, Colombo, Gambino, Genovese und Lucchese.Replies: @syonredux
What about Italian names that end in “s”: De Santis, De Angelis, De Laurentiis, etc
Indeed. One might even call it suicidal.
Names that end in “s” are mostly Southern. I think the “s” may reflect the strong historic ethnic Greek presence in Southern Italy, especially in Puglia.
Your evident antipathy to the content of Talmud is preventing you from thinking clearly about the genetic issues.
Backed up on Daly by the OPM data: 143 Daly feds average 98,788 or +$16,000.
Not so much on the Higgins, a more common Irish name. 314 federal Higgins average $85,526 for a modest factor or +$3000.
Compare to a less common Irish name, that was once Irish-American royalty: Meagher (Thomas Meagher). 21 federal Meaghers averaging $82,532, which is a basically the fed average (factor of 0).Replies: @Karl, @Travis
So many African-Americans have Irish-sounding last names — Eddie Murphy, Isaac Hayes, Mariah Carey, Dizzy Gillespie, Toni Morrison and some notable Black athletes such as Shaquille O’Neal, Randall Cunningham, Donovan McNabb, Karl Malone, Steve McNair, Steph Curry….
I don't consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America's real enemies - China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn't have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.Replies: @Coemgen, @Anonymous, @International Jew, @Dissident
Yep. When it comes to Trump, I’m with (the more recent) Ann Coulter: I voted for him not because of his character and his rhetorical style but in spite of them. That is, I viewed the immigration issue as so important, that I was willing to take the only candidate who “got it”, despite his flaws.
Now a year into his tenure, I see I got the idiot I knew about, but little of the immigration policy I hoped for.
The last white guys with those names.Replies: @Flip, @ScarletNumber
I’ve run across plenty of white Jacksons over the years.
What did George Washington and Thomas Jefferson have in common?
They were the last white people to have these names.Replies: @Indiana Jack
Most Washingtons and Jeffersons are black, but there are still several thousand white people having those names as well.
Ten years ago ancestry.com traced the Washington family genealogy to see who would be king of America had the U.S.A. become a hereditary monarch under George Washington after the Revolution. They found that the most likely candidate was Paul Emery Washington (since deceased) of San Antonio, Texas:
https://blogs.ancestry.com/cm/king-of-america-who-would-be-washingtons-heir/
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27075856/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/texan-george-washingtons-closest-kin/#.WlPCuK5Ku1s
Another surname that puzzled me when I was growing up was J’Anthony. There were a couple extended families in town with that moniker, and one of the members was fairly active in the local sports scene. I couldn’t begin to imagine what nationality that could be.
Much later I found out that it was a rather awkward Americanization of Giantonio.
You wouldn’t say that if you’d studied Talmud — composed by “Palestinian” and Mesopotamian Jews between 200 and 600 AD.
Granted only a small elite actually produced the Talmud, but it says something about the wider society of the time, that they viewed the scholars as their leaders and role models. And if you’re unsure about that, then reflect for a moment about what the descent of American culture — from Bing Crosby to Elvis and on to Snoop Dogg, or from Barry Goldwater to Reagan and on to Trump — says about the moral and intellectual condition of our wider society.
Compared to the Classical Greeks, everyone else in the Ancient Med looks kinda second-rate.....Replies: @Karl, @International Jew, @Dmitry
seen its day. Spare us any more of it.Replies: @International Jew
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136%3Abook%3D8%3Acard%3D250Replies: @Light Roast
To put it in modern pickup artist terms – Ares was an alpha male badboy (can’t get more badboy than God of War), while Hephaestus was a beta male provider with a steady job as a blacksmith.
Mostly Italian:
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2016/07/20/even-more-on-ashkenazi-ancestry/
Cochran’s theory is that high Ashkenazi IQ was due to the fact that they specialized in “White Collar” jobs:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.3711&rep=rep1&type=pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence#”Natural_History_of_Ashkenazi_Intelligence”
Dunno. Compare that to what the Greeks achieved: Plato, Aristotle, Archimedes, Diophantus, Eratosthenes, ….
Compared to the Classical Greeks, everyone else in the Ancient Med looks kinda second-rate…..
having had the good luck to NOT have their work lost forever, is NOT the same thing as being especially outstanding in their own day
A fabulous gentile gentleman (Wallace T. Wallington) in Michigan, has a great website about now-almost-lost skills:
www.theforgottentechnology.com
I recommend buying his DVD's. Amazing fellow.Replies: @Dmitry
The antisemitic meme you're reaching for is that the Jews in ancient times weren't as smart as the Jews of the last 150 years.Replies: @J.Ross
You can't generalize from the population, from a few standout geniuses. Srinivasa Ramanujan is not indicative of the average dude in a Southern Indian village.Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
Well, the “genetic issue” that prompted this conversation was your assertion that sacerdotal celibacy had a significant impact on European IQ. As I’ve pointed out, elementary genetics shows that that was not the case…..
Think about my dog analogy; by disengaging your emotions, you'll be able to think more clearly.
Surnames are a very weak signal of behavioural traits, I would imagine, in most instances. Gregory Clarke gets statistically significant results by using very large samples which he collects and collates from years of work with research assistants. Anecdotal evidence can be fun but should not be taken too seriously. This comes from a blog-poster with a bog-standard name, so maybe I am envious. LBJ??? Magic Johnson? Oh well, luckily the method works very poorly in most cases except with massive amounts of data.
I agree about the Percys - I too have never met a poor one.
I do happen to know, on the other, that a family of lower class Erskines live, not only in Scotland, but actually in Alloa, the site of the historic seat of the Earls of Mar.
Servants who took the name, or perhaps an illegitimate branch? In any case, they are always courteously treated by the head of the family.Replies: @Ivy, @Verymuchalive
Californian senior citizen, you are remarkably well-informed. Do I surmise that you have more than a little Scots ancestry?
Actually the story is even more bizarre than you realise. The Mar clan originated in the Mar region, north of Aberdeen. By the 18th Century, most of the clan were living near Alloa, Clacks, Scotland. Only a residue lived in Mar. By this time, the earl and nearly all the Lowland clan bore the surname Erskine. Only the Highland clan retained the name Mar(r).
After “Bobbing John”, the earl at the time, got forfeited ( 1715 Jacobite Rebellion), things got even more complicated. This came to a head in the 1875 House of Lords case. It found that the Earl of Mar ( 1st Creation- according to the House of Lords ) was entitled (ho ho ho) to aforesaid title and was chief of clan Mar(r). The Earl of Mar and Kellie ( 7th Creation – according to House of Lords ) was entitled to aforesaid title and was chief of clan Erskine.
This looks like a complete victory for the Earl of Mar. He is recognised as numero uno. He keeps the upmarket Mar(r)s. The Earl of Mar and Kellie is demoted to number 7 and has the more diverse Erskines.
Then things get bonkers. The House of Lords agrees that the Earldom is the successor to the Mormaer of Mar going back a thousand years. And, of course, a thousand years ago, nobody had surnames. Thus the Earl of Mar is summarily excised of his surname. The present incumbent is Margaret of Mar, 31st Countess of Mar. She does NOT have a surname.
She cannot have surname privilege because she has been legally removed of her surname !
Always happy to keep an old Scots American informed.
This red herring about studying the Talmud indicating high intellectual activity is a fraud that has
seen its day. Spare us any more of it.
All I said was, “Too bad the smartest Roman Catholics were sworn to celibacy.” That doesn’t mean Roman Catholics selected against intelligence, just that they missed one opportunity to select for it.
Think about my dog analogy; by disengaging your emotions, you’ll be able to think more clearly.
151 snorlax > with the remainder mostly nouveau riche, gold-chain-wearing recent Persian and Israeli immigrants
i’ll mention your theory to the folks at the Spanish and Portugese Synagogue in New York (established in 1654)
the sfardim have been in the New World since the late 1590’s. At which time, by the way, their cousins had already been in Tiberias for a hundred years or so.
Google on “American Sephardi”. These folks consider themselves as Blue Bloods. And in many ways, they ==do== have a better claim to be Judean than any recent British Royal Family has a claim to being English.
Compared to the Classical Greeks, everyone else in the Ancient Med looks kinda second-rate.....Replies: @Karl, @International Jew, @Dmitry
312 syonredux > Compare that to what the Greeks achieved: Plato, Aristotle, Archimedes, Diophantus, Eratosthenes, ….
having had the good luck to NOT have their work lost forever, is NOT the same thing as being especially outstanding in their own day
A fabulous gentile gentleman (Wallace T. Wallington) in Michigan, has a great website about now-almost-lost skills:
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com
I recommend buying his DVD’s. Amazing fellow.
Btw there are fellows with Norman last names involved with small modular nuclear reactors
I wonder if the impetus might not be a desire for space exploration
seen its day. Spare us any more of it.Replies: @International Jew
What do you know of the Talmud — its contents and the way of thinking in it?
Compared to the Classical Greeks, everyone else in the Ancient Med looks kinda second-rate.....Replies: @Karl, @International Jew, @Dmitry
Not measuring up to the classical Greeks doesn’t make someone “not particularly bright”. But lemme help you out there.
The antisemitic meme you’re reaching for is that the Jews in ancient times weren’t as smart as the Jews of the last 150 years.
Home run! 🙂
The antisemitic meme you're reaching for is that the Jews in ancient times weren't as smart as the Jews of the last 150 years.Replies: @J.Ross
… they generally weren’t. Prior to that philosopher guy who was palling around Enlightenment salons and subsequent to losing their temple, they largely withdrew from the world. The fact that they caught up so quick is to their credit but there are no medieval internal combustion engines buried under the street bricks of Prague.
Compared to the Classical Greeks, everyone else in the Ancient Med looks kinda second-rate.....Replies: @Karl, @International Jew, @Dmitry
Yes but if read Plato – the interlocutors (aristocratic youth) that are in debate with Socrates, often seem like complete simpletons, of a level which would not graduate highschool in any modern countries.
You can’t generalize from the population, from a few standout geniuses. Srinivasa Ramanujan is not indicative of the average dude in a Southern Indian village.
having had the good luck to NOT have their work lost forever, is NOT the same thing as being especially outstanding in their own day
A fabulous gentile gentleman (Wallace T. Wallington) in Michigan, has a great website about now-almost-lost skills:
www.theforgottentechnology.com
I recommend buying his DVD's. Amazing fellow.Replies: @Dmitry
If you read Plato (for example, the Republic). There’s no doubt that the author, who puts his words into Socrates’ mouth, is a very smart dude. But many of the interlocutors (most of them intellectually curious aristocratic youth) he is arguing against, (and even alleged philosophers like Polemarchus), are portrayed as complete simpletons, who would struggle to keep up on a lesbian dance theory course in today’s universities. This could be in part a rhetorical device – but the surviving literature of Ancient Greece makes it very clear that the philosophers as a group were viewed as the most unusual, exotic and uncommon figures.
You can’t generalize population’s level, from a sample of few brilliant men.
You need a long-attention span, if nothing else – just to read a couple pages. That said, people of such former times hardly had the distractions we have today.
A hundred years ago, even many peasants would enjoy reading the bible. While reading this book would be an accomplishment that would be a struggle today for many university graduates, and not due to lack of intelligence.
The last white guys with those names.Replies: @Flip, @ScarletNumber
See post 244
Cohen is a Hebrew name (כהן) which literally means “priest” (mostly of the Jewish religion). It’s also a common Jewish surname which represents an ancient biblical priestly heritage.
And “Cohen” is probably cognate with “Khan.”
Consider the name ( or is it an honorific title ?) “Aga Kahn.”
“Katz” is a transliteration of an acronym for Kohein Tzedek (“Righteous priest”).
To test correlations between priestly surnames and achievement just look at these rare surnames and throw out all Cohens and Levys.
i'll mention your theory to the folks at the Spanish and Portugese Synagogue in New York (established in 1654)
the sfardim have been in the New World since the late 1590's. At which time, by the way, their cousins had already been in Tiberias for a hundred years or so.
Google on "American Sephardi". These folks consider themselves as Blue Bloods. And in many ways, they ==do== have a better claim to be Judean than any recent British Royal Family has a claim to being English.Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
A.S.W. Rosenbach, the famous Philadelphia book dealer who largely assembled the Folger Shakespeare Library and the Huntington Library, and who had J.P. Morgan and Harry Widener as clients, was an Ashkenazic Jew on both sides of his family, but took pride in being a member of the Congregation Mikveh Israel, founded by Spanish and Portuguese Jews in 1745. Jonas Phillips and Haym Solomon, who served in the American Revolution, had belonged to that synagogue.
There are many British surnames that are though to have come from roles played in pageants or local connections, some of which are religious, or appear religious, for example Abbey, Abbot, Dean, Saint, St. John, Pope, Bishop, Priest, Priestley, Pilgrim, Canon, Church, Kirk, Pew, Bell, Cross, Graves, King, Queen, Lord, Earl, Duke, Squires.
Of course many Christian names became surnames in the next generations, such as Peters, Matthews, Johnson, and so on.Replies: @Jim Christian
Well, the old Scots-Irish I come from used Christian as a surname long before they turned up in the New World. Must have happened long before my Christians (actual last name Christian) were brought here through the old Jamestown Company. They were named Benton and Milhouse (haus?) and other boring first names followed by the surname. From records of others that also came into Jamestown, I suspect they were all debtors, real or created. Debtor’s prisons were good sources of manpower. Saw some accounts at Fairfax County Library in Virginia that Jamestown supposedly bought them out of debt and at that point had a new ’employee’ to clear lumber, kill Injuns and settle the country West of the Blue Ridge. Whether the original Christians got old and their children scattered or perhaps they’d worked off their debt, but finally, their journey ended around what became Nashville and Milton, Tn with 40 acres and a mule, to quote a phrase. They married into the Wrights, moved off to Kill Devil Hills returned, the cycle went on for 125 or 150 years before my Dad came along. Of course, the Wrights tinkered with bicycles, I understand. Probably some inbreeding there, explains my idiocy at times, but tips off why I went to the recruiter and told him I wanted to work on flight decks and play with airplanes.
I always believed Cohen was a Sephardic surname, specifically from Portugal.
You can't generalize from the population, from a few standout geniuses. Srinivasa Ramanujan is not indicative of the average dude in a Southern Indian village.Replies: @Crawfurdmuir
Plato’s dialogues must be read as works of literature rather than as faithful records of real conversation, and the character of Socrates as voicing Plato’s own thoughts rather than as an accurate portrayal of the man. There is no doubt that Socrates was a well-known character in the Athens of his day, yet Xenophon and Aristophanes represent Socrates quite differently than does Plato. What was the real Socrates like? We can’t say, but he was probably not the perfect protagonist of Plato’s dialogues, nor were his opponents in debate the simpletons that Plato portrays.
The remarkable achievements of classical Greece in any event don’t boil down to a few figures like Socrates, but to a remarkable body of literature, much now lost or remaining only in isolated fragments or summaries (e.g., as found in the Deipnosophistae of Athenæus), and the remains of its material culture, such as architecture, sculpture, decorated pottery, etc.
I have seen the argument, and am persuaded by it, that at least one of the underlying reasons behind Greek intellectual achievement was the invention of the Greek alphabet, which made it easy to become literate. It was not ideographic and did not require extensive memorization, as (for example) Chinese still does. It had vowels, unlike Hebrew and kindred languages. Even the vowels were differentiated between short and long, e.g., omicron (literally, “little o”) and omega (“big o”) – so one could learn to read and write phonetically. Moreover, complex concepts could be expressed by the formation of compound words, the meaning of which was relatively easy to discern by knowing their components. Even today, understanding medical terminology is facilitated by an understanding of Greek.
By making literacy easily achievable, the Greek alphabet freed its users to devote their time to other intellectual pursuits, whereas an ideographic system of writing required extensive study just to acquire a written vocabulary. Literacy became more widespread; it was no longer hieratic, as it had been elsewhere. Thus the ancient Greeks were enabled to explore mathematics, natural science, philosophy, and the arts, and to develop a literary culture of widely varied form and extent, exceeding that of other ancient societies.
I've got news for you. The Irish were always white!Replies: @International Jew, @Reg Cæsar
“White” doesn’t do justice to the truly ruddy:
https://www.tenontours.com/dispelling-irish-stereotypes-why-are-all-the-irish-red-heads/

Crawfurdmuir – thanks for the interesting post.
Just a couple points:
The biblical Hebrew has a very complicated vowel system. The modern Hebrew simplifies this system – and also does not write them down (assuming the reader to fill the vowels in).
Nietzsche argues that the key ingredient, not so much as particularly to intellectual achievement, but to overall cultural flourishing – was the competition between the city-states. In this view, Alexander’s destruction of Thebes is the final ‘shut-down’ to the era of culturally-productive ‘agon’ between city-states.
As everyone perceives of course, Nietzsche’s views have a lot of idiosyncrasies, e.g. (his view of the heightened self-consciousness of Socrates as indicator, or even partial instigator, of the degeneration of Greek philosophy).
The (perhaps simpleminded) Russian view always describes this as a product of the slave-economy (“freeing its users to devote their time to other intellectual pursuits”). Although it doesn’t account for lack of comparable philosophical achievement in many other slave-economies – e.g. the inability of the Romans to continue a philosophical tradition of the same standard.
Although as a correction to this ignorant above comment of mine, the written vowel system (nekudot) only began to be added at the time of Ezra, and became more developed in subsequent centuries (the Torah is written without vowels) – so you could have a valid point with this.
I stayed at a Patel owned hotel recently where I got to talking with the swarthy owner about his hi-fi setup at home. This guy had purchased, new and at only a modest discount from retail, a setup consisting of "Stereophile Class A Recommended Components " costing more than the house he was living in. We talked about the technical issues for a minute and I brought up the cost issue, to which he responded that he bought stereo equipment with his cash income, and the house with railroad income (his facility did a lot of his business housing railcrews who go out to another location and back as soon as they have completed their rest period). He liked stereo equipment and watches because they are in the house and away from IRS eyes, and unlike cars aren't licensed and titled.
He had no idea what I did and wasn't concerned that he was essentially sharing the fact he was skimming large amounts of cash off his business with someone who for all he knew might have been IRS, FBI or whatever.
And really why shouldn't he do that? Does he have any real investment in the American nation? Hell no.Replies: @anon
Apple, Google, Microsoft all do that; it is called tax avoidance (move all IP generation to Ireland, produce “Software” in Puerto Rico etc.,); Some, being less sophisticated, just plain do tax evasion. It is a pretty fuzzy boundary though. Leona Helmsley, an aristocratic billionaire, made a pithy observation: “We don’t pay taxes; only the little people pay taxes”.
I don't consider that a virtue, I consider that stupid short-sighted behavior that only plays into the hands of America's real enemies - China, Russia, and the Islamic world. A real leader would try to persuade and encourage as many talented Americans as possible to join him. An America that alienates half the people with an IQ over 120 probably doesn't have a long term future. Reagan may have made mistakes, but he understood that point. So did Churchill. Trump does not. On that point Trump is more like Pol Pot, encouraging the stupid to attack the educated.Replies: @Coemgen, @Anonymous, @International Jew, @Dissident
Just how is Russia– the Russia of today– an enemy of the U.S.?
China is a rival but need it be an enemy?
Is the entire Islamic world an enemy of the U.S.? Need the entire Islamic world be so? Would they be so if not for the pernicious Invade the World folly that our Respectable class has foisted upon us?
How many actual enemies would we have if we were to simply heed George Washington’s warning to avoid foreign entanglements?
———–
In response to your exchange with the Anonymous who had praised President Trump for “the fact that the man delivers continuous angina to our enemies.”, a statement to which you took exception, I say the following.
I want a President to be hated and feared by Cultural Marxists; SJWs and Sanctimonious Goodwhites; war-mongering Globalists; brazenly buggering, disease-promoting degenerates*; and all other pernicious, noxious, corrosive and predatory vermin. I do not want a President to indulge in pissing contests and other vulgar, unseemly, puerile antics that are often gratuitously and excessively malicious and always pointless.
*Graphic content
Thank you. I had the impression that vowel points in Hebrew were a much later introduction, and owed to the Masoretes, who flourished no earlier than the 5th century AD. Is it not the case that the Septuagint is actually earlier than the Masoretic text of the O.T.?
There's amazing 18th century English text on this debate: https://books.google.ru/books?id=pj9OAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA25&dq=Dissertation+on+the+Hebrew+Vowel-points+ezra+or+others+in+his+time&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCr6-SyMzYAhVkLMAKHUFUCu0Q6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Dissertation%20on%20the%20Hebrew%20Vowel-points%20ezra%20or%20others%20in%20his%20time&f=false
Although as for the historical truth - you are surely right (although my knowledge in this area doesn't got beyond some intermediate-Hebrew reading skills).
The tradition claims the nekudot and cantillation to Ezra (after it had been forgotten to oral tradition) – it seems based (the cantillation notes part) on: https://www.sefaria.org/Megillah.3a.1?lang=bi
There’s amazing 18th century English text on this debate: https://books.google.ru/books?id=pj9OAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA25&dq=Dissertation+on+the+Hebrew+Vowel-points+ezra+or+others+in+his+time&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCr6-SyMzYAhVkLMAKHUFUCu0Q6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Dissertation%20on%20the%20Hebrew%20Vowel-points%20ezra%20or%20others%20in%20his%20time&f=false
Although as for the historical truth – you are surely right (although my knowledge in this area doesn’t got beyond some intermediate-Hebrew reading skills).
Duos like literally/figuratively and nauseous/nauseating are particularly disappointing because the result is that we no longer have words which mean what the former of each of those pairs used to mean. There are many such examples and one effect is that our ability to think about things is actually diminished.Replies: @englishmike
I agree. The language lost an important distinction when disinterested came to be treated as a synonym for “uninterested”.
And although it’s not the same kind of “duo”, I notice an increasing tendency for people to use brutalized to mean “brutally treated” rather than “turned into a brute”.
Going back to the comment of yours that began the discussion, I quote:I had no idea this was the case.
I don't know how reputable Dictionary.com* is considered but, having just checked, I see that they give the following for the fourth and final definition in the entry for literally:
(*Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017.)There is a usage note that begins,Since the early 19th century? Really? I thought it was no more than 10-15 years since this (mis-)usage became widespread.Replies: @englishmike
If a man has only daughters (or no children) his name doesn't get passed to the next generation. Rare names are at a constant threat of disappearing. When a name dies because a man only had female offspring, the odds are it gets replaced by a common name, in fact the most likely replacement is the most common name in the culture. The more common a name is, the more likely it is that it is the name that takes over when another dies. Eventually any such last name system "degenerates" into a couple of common names that eat all the others.
My last name has a few dozen people and it's in two unrelated families. We didn't use inherited last names in my home region until the Russians took over 200 years ago and my home region is full of unique last names that exist only there. (Mine is the name of the estate that my great-great-great-grandfather acquired; it was standard for landowners to pick the names of their property.) In some other parts of Finland where inherited last names have been used for much longer there is much more domination by a couple of common names.Replies: @Nico
Does make sense that the patriarchal surname tends to function similarly to the Y-chromosome. (Of course, the Welsh have a different explanation: they were forced to abandon their largely patronymic surnames in favor of fixed ones in the 19th century, and certain first names – which were subsequently modified and/or molded into surnames – were more common than others.)
Just be assured that it was a major trade, on a level with masons or carters. And if it weren't for them, c'est certain que je vous addresserez-ez-ez en francais (or whatever their monkey-gibber is, correctly).Replies: @Logan
Quite right.
And although it's not the same kind of "duo", I notice an increasing tendency for people to use brutalized to mean "brutally treated" rather than "turned into a brute".Replies: @Dissident, @ScarletNumber
I very much appreciated these comments of yours and Anonymous on the corruption in usage of words such as literally, etc.
Going back to the comment of yours that began the discussion, I quote:
I had no idea this was the case.
I don’t know how reputable Dictionary.com* is considered but, having just checked, I see that they give the following for the fourth and final definition in the entry for literally:
(*Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017.)
There is a usage note that begins,
Since the early 19th century? Really? I thought it was no more than 10-15 years since this (mis-)usage became widespread.
- I can assure you that in England it has been in common colloquial usage for much longer. I first became aware of it the late 1960s.
I am surprised to hear that it dates from the early 19th century. If that is the case, I'm also surprised that dictionaries took so long to record (and thereby encourage) the (mis)usage. I only heard about it last year, when it was a minor item in a BBC Radio news programme.
As with uninterested/disinterested it is regrettable because it threatens to remove an important distinction from the language, even at the higher academic levels of discourse. Of course, that comment leads into the debate about notions of linguistic "correctness" and whether discussions of language should be more "descriptive" than "prescriptive".
Do you think we should persuade Ron Unz or Steve Sailer to provide an "open thread" on these issues of language usage and abusage?
And although it's not the same kind of "duo", I notice an increasing tendency for people to use brutalized to mean "brutally treated" rather than "turned into a brute".Replies: @Dissident, @ScarletNumber
I too am fighting the quixotic battle that disinterested and uninterested are not synonyms. The example that I like to use are judges. You want them to be disinterested but not uninterested.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.3711&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence#"Natural_History_of_Ashkenazi_Intelligence"Replies: @Bill, @Anon
Northern Italian, which is a kind of northern European.
Are you saying this is different from “bred for intelligence for 1000 years?”
From memory:
Goldschmidt (Americanized Goldsmith), Kupferschmidt, Silberschmidt
From:
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/.premium-1.584816
…………………………………………………………
Smith: Schmidt, Haddad, Schlosser, Blechman, Koval, Sayag, Goldschmidt, Zlotnick or Argentero
………………………………………………………..
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.3711&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence#"Natural_History_of_Ashkenazi_Intelligence"Replies: @Bill, @Anon
As I’ve said before, Cochran’s thesis should be easy enough to test. Who’s smarter in India: merchant castes like Patels or brahmin castes like Iyers?
Davies/Davis is also a common Welsh name.
KAZHDAN / KAZDAN is another surname with priestly associations that should be added to the list. It’s an acronym of the Talmudic phrase “Kohani Shluchi D’Rachmona Ninhu” — “Kohanim are the messengers of the All-Merciful [God]” (Talmud, Yoma 19a).
To test correlations between priestly surnames and achievement just look at these rare surnames and throw out all Cohens and Levys.
I once knew an Indonesian kid with the surname Cohen. When asked if he’s of Jewish descent he got super defensive, hehe.
Definitely there were a good amount of Dutch Jews involved in trade with the East Indies from the get-go, and some must have settled and assimilated. How the hell else could his name been Cohen?!
Going back to the comment of yours that began the discussion, I quote:I had no idea this was the case.
I don't know how reputable Dictionary.com* is considered but, having just checked, I see that they give the following for the fourth and final definition in the entry for literally:
(*Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017.)There is a usage note that begins,Since the early 19th century? Really? I thought it was no more than 10-15 years since this (mis-)usage became widespread.Replies: @englishmike
Thanks for your interesting response. About your concluding point –
– I can assure you that in England it has been in common colloquial usage for much longer. I first became aware of it the late 1960s.
I am surprised to hear that it dates from the early 19th century. If that is the case, I’m also surprised that dictionaries took so long to record (and thereby encourage) the (mis)usage. I only heard about it last year, when it was a minor item in a BBC Radio news programme.
As with uninterested/disinterested it is regrettable because it threatens to remove an important distinction from the language, even at the higher academic levels of discourse. Of course, that comment leads into the debate about notions of linguistic “correctness” and whether discussions of language should be more “descriptive” than “prescriptive”.
Do you think we should persuade Ron Unz or Steve Sailer to provide an “open thread” on these issues of language usage and abusage?