The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Soros's D.A. in L.A. Won't Oppose Release of Sirhan Sirhan

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the Washington Post news section:

Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of Robert F. Kennedy assassination, seeks parole with no opposition from prosecutors

Attorneys say that 53 years behind bars is sufficient punishment for the 77-year-old; Kennedy family declines to weigh in

By Tom Jackman
Yesterday at 12:52 p.m. EDT

Sirhan B. Sirhan, convicted of the 1968 assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, will face a California parole board for the 16th time Friday in a prison outside San Diego. But unlike the first 15 times, no prosecutor will stand to oppose the release of Sirhan, who is now 77.

… Newly elected Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón told The Washington Post shortly before his inauguration in December that he was creating a sentencing review unit to revisit the cases of about 20,000 prisoners for possible resentencing, analyzing both the fairness of long sentences and the cost savings for releasing low-risk or older inmates. Gascón issued a directive that his office’s “default policy” would be not to attend parole hearings and to submit letters supporting the release of some inmates who had served their mandatory minimums, while also assisting victims and victim advocates at parole hearings if requested.

After all, Sirhan Sirhan merely single-handedly deprived American voters of a major choice in the making of the President 1968. What’s that compared to George Soros’s war on the New Jim Crow?

In Sirhan’s case, Gascón’s office is remaining neutral. The office said it will not attend the parole hearing, as Los Angeles prosecutors have done historically, but it also will not send a letter in support of Sirhan’s parole.

“The role of a prosecutor and their access to information ends at sentencing,” said Alex Bastian, special adviser to Gascón. “The parole board’s sole purpose is to objectively determine whether someone is suitable for release. If someone is the same person that committed an atrocious crime, that person will correctly not be found suitable for release. However, if someone is no longer a threat to public safety after having served more than 50 years in prison, then the parole board may recommend release based on an objective determination.”

OK, but Sirhan Sirhan still is the same person who committed an atrocious crime. Maybe not in the metaphorical sense that he’s less likely than in 1968 to assassinate a major political leader, but he is in the actual sense that he’s still the murderer who deprived the American public of a choice in the 1968 Presidential election. (Robert F. Kennedy had just won the key California Democratic primary over Eugene McCarthy moments before the Palestinian immigrant murdered him.)

The Washington Post then indulges in a lot of conspiracy theorizing about a Second Gunman. Liberal talk radio in L.A. in the 1970s featured endless RFK conspiracy theorizing (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction). But I always found RFK conspiracy theorizing boring compared to JFK, the gold standard of conspiracy theories.

After all, there’s no question that Sirhan opened fire on Kennedy from up close and personal in front of a large crowd at his Ambassador Hotel victory party. Sirhan was quickly jumped on by Rams defensive lineman and minister Rosey Grier, Olympic decathlon champion Rafer Johnson, and wit George Plimpton, three quality individuals. Were they in on the conspiracy to kill RFK too? (I can recall the next morning the news radio announcing that the name of the suspect was “Rafer Johnson,” and 9-year-old me thinking, “No, Rafer Johnson helped get the gun away from the assassin.”)

Sure you can make up complicated theories about how, sure, Sirhan shot at the candidate but he missed Kennedy from arm’s length and the mysterious Second Gunman actually killed him — for instance, the Post quotes at length a 96 year old labor leader and victim that night who now thinks that while Sirhan shot him, somebody else shot Kennedy — which is all very interesting. And highly reminiscent of the main alternative theory about the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. senator, Huey Long in 1935, who some believe was fatally wounded by his bodyguards unloading on the doctor who attacked him.

But for the purposes of Sirhan’s parole, so what?

One reason there was so much conspiracy theorizing back in the 1970s about Sirhan was that his motives seemed inscrutable. But that was because at the time Sirhan shot the candidate who promised 50 American jet fighters for Israel on the one-year anniversary of Israel starting the Six-Days-War, practically nobody in America had a category in their heads labeled “Palestinian terrorist.” The concept didn’t really emerge until George Habash started pulling off spectacular stunts like hijacking and blowing up three jetliners simultaneously and culminating in the Munich Olympic atrocity in 1972. So, back then Sirhan was just some implausible-sounding Lone Wolf.

In California, two parole commissioners conduct the hearing, corrections department spokesman Luis Patino said. The two-person panel typically issues its decision and explains its rationale on the day of the hearing. Following that, the parole board staff has 90 days to review the case, followed by a 30-day period in which the governor can uphold, reverse or modify the decision, take no action, or send the decision to the full 17-person parole board, Patino said.

If I was into conspiracy theorizing, I’d say this was all a setup to give embattled Gov. Gavin Newsom a political win by having him announce that he would reverse any granting of parole to Sirhan.

But I think people like Gascon do stupid stuff less because they are super smart than that they get stupid ideas in their head — like too many Murderers of Color are in prison — and feel compelled to follow out the logic of their bad ideas even to reductio ad absurdums like freeing Sirhan Sirhan.

For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

 
Hide 307 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Somewhat related:

    300 recall ballots found in passed out felon’s car in 7 Eleven parking lot:

    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-23/torrance-police-find-more-than-300-ballots-in-suspects-car-along-with-gun-drugs

    They also found drugs, multiple IDs, a gun, and credit cards. the honor student’s name has not been released.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Mike Tre

    How can he be a real honor student without also being a member of Antifa?

    , @JimDandy
    @Mike Tre

    Yeah. The Dems realized they had a great asset in their criminal black constituency, so they put them to work stealing the election in the urban centers of swing states, with the honest assurance that there was no way they'd ever be held accountable for their actions. There's no reason to believe this won't get worse and worse. I don't know if this guy you're referencing is black, but it provided me with a nice opportunity to state a fact many reasonable people can't, for some reason, permit themselves to believe.

  2. When I was young, people would claim that it was the FBI or CIA who dunnit (whatever outrage “it” might be) and I scoffed.

    Now, with the wisdom of the years, added to the displays by the US Securitate over 9/11, Russiagate, and so on, I begin to suspect that maybe there was more to “it” than met the eye.

    Anyhoo, you might get lucky. Let the bugger out and maybe he’ll assassinate some other political creep. At least you could give him a decoration for keeping another Kennedy out of office.

    • Agree: Chris Mallory, JMcG
    • Replies: @Charlesz Martel
    @dearieme

    Like I always say:

    "If guns are outlawed, how will we kill the Kennedys?"

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    , @Harry Baldwin
    @dearieme

    I just listened to Joe Rogan's almost 3 hour interview with Tom O'Neill about his book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. If O'Neill's research doesn't persuade you that the CIA is capable of anything, nothing will.

    https://jrelibrary.com/1459-tom-oneill/

    What gets me is that Rogan will say, "Wow, they were up to some crazy shit back then." Back then?! What about the last five years?

    Replies: @DCThrowback, @JimDandy, @anon

  3. I oppose the death penalty, but this is a hell of an argument in favor of it.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @NJ Transit Commuter

    Ok Shlomo.


    In 1989, he told David Frost: "My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians."
     
    Give the guy a medal

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @stillCARealist
    @NJ Transit Commuter

    I support the death penalty and this is one of my many arguments in favor of it.

  4. @Mike Tre
    Somewhat related:

    300 recall ballots found in passed out felon's car in 7 Eleven parking lot:

    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-23/torrance-police-find-more-than-300-ballots-in-suspects-car-along-with-gun-drugs

    They also found drugs, multiple IDs, a gun, and credit cards. the honor student's name has not been released.

    Replies: @El Dato, @JimDandy

    How can he be a real honor student without also being a member of Antifa?

  5. There are lots of conspiracies associated with a number of those problem-child Kennedies. There’s got to be ONE of them that is right for JFK, as there are so many reasons certain people – Deep State, anybody? – WOULD have been out to get him, the odds are just not likely that none of them are the case. I wish his assassination hadn’t resulted in the rise of the Socialist Scumbag LBJ, but all of these guys were missing a Conservative “gene” so to speak.

    For the rest of the “Clan”, well, the men are just a bunch of accident-prone screw ups. Skiing into trees, not knowing how to fly instruments in straight-and-level flight when you’ve been taught for 10 or more hours, driving drunk off bridges (and leaving her to SUFFOCATE)., etc. It’s not an accident when a whole family is accident-prone. They were just not prudent people, hence not Conservatives at heart.

    The best thing since JFK Jr, kicked it (and nothing personal against that particular guy) is that we don’t have to hear from the women voters and cucks about “muh Kennedy Clan”, “Camelot!”, and “I’m in LUV!”

    As for the main topic, that 77 y/o man will just die soon anyway, but it’s the deals like ex-Governor Cuomo’s pardon that really do the damage. Hey maybe George Soros would like to learn to fly, or ski, or take Hillary out on a date down on the Vinyed.

    • Agree: El Dato, Alden, 36 ulster
    • Replies: @Alden
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Accident prone is a euphemism for drunk or drugged. Best place to get drunk or do drugs is at home bear a couch or bed.

    Not at a party or bar where you'll have to drive home. Not just before you get on a boat or fly your plane get on a surfboard or sky down the mountain.

    Replies: @anon

    , @David In TN
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Alden, @dearieme, @Achmed E. Newman

  6. The modern world is like a neverending X-Files inspired serial where long lost plot elements suddenly reappear as ominous doom music plays the whole time.

    “Kamala, you are not going to believe this!”
    “Hahahahaha”

    • LOL: James N. Kennett
  7. • Replies: @Alden
    @Flip

    You cite The Guardian? Voice of the Communist Party of Great Britain since the party was founded? Nowadays devotes itself to the genocide of the native White people of the U.K. and replacement by black and browns governed by sharia law?

    You are a retarded brainwashed loathsome liberal moron. Probably think Cuba is the most prosperous nation in the Americas because of Castro. Probably donate To BLM Probably donated to Obama worked on his campaign and voted for him. The Guardian

    Typical Man of UNZ . No ability to think for himself. Just ask google and cite the first loathsome liberal propaganda that shows up.

    The Guardian You Might as well cite The Forward, The Nation and The Daily Worker. Or Mark Lane.

  8. the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. president, Huey Long in 1935,

    I believe you mean senator, not president.

    No question the MLK and RFK killings had hugely bad impacts on the US, and I don’t care for either man. The man who shot at FDR early in ’33 was executed before his inaugural or soon after. We shouldn’t mess around with political murder. OTOH, the man who shot Scalise was quickly dead and his crime forgotten by most.

    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    @Ralph L

    How about this guy?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Collazo

    Sentenced to death, but given life thanks to Truman (the target of the assassination attempt). Then let out by good 'ol Jimmy Carter and decorated by Castro.

    , @Verymuchalive
    @Ralph L

    If only Huey Long had been President. America wouldn't be in the mess it is now.

    , @Chris Mallory
    @Ralph L


    We shouldn’t mess around with political murder.
     
    If someone has to be murdered, better a politician than an innocent.
    , @Hibernian
    @Ralph L


    The man who shot at FDR early in ’33...
     
    For which read the Mob hitman who successfully whacked Mayor Anton Cermak of Chicago with Roosevelt as a cover story.

    Replies: @prosa123

  9. So who’s the Criminal Elite’s target with this move; Creepy Joe or Kamala?

  10. For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, ‘It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.’ It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: ‘if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?’ There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register.”

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    • LOL: Verymuchalive
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Pat Hannagan

    The science on this is already settled
    https://youtu.be/25sSLBvk_M8

    , @Art Deco
    @Pat Hannagan

    By no international or historical standard are 'the people' in this country 'mainly poor'.

    Replies: @Chris Mallory

    , @Dumbo
    @Pat Hannagan


    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.
     
    At this point, I don't know anymore if it's disingenuity or cluelessness by Steve.

    "Ruin his reputation in old age"??
    When in Hell Soros had a "reputation" to ruin?
    In his youth when he was helping confiscate property from his fellow Jews?
    Or in 1992 when the shorted the British pound?

    And Steve does the same thing dismissing the "not so great reset" as just a silly idea by billionaires that for some reason are acting like bumbling morons who don't know what they were doing.

    Probably, Steve sucks up to rich and famous and smart, high-status people, because he wishes he was as rich and famous and smart and high-status as them; and so he tries to protect their "reputation".

    But to paint them as dumb morons who somehow don't know what they are doing, or that they are engaging in evil stuff "by accident" or "by mistake", is just embarrassing.

    Replies: @BB753, @Pat Hannagan

    , @Jack D
    @Pat Hannagan

    It's appropriate that you add you little snide remark about groveling to the Jews to the above quote. The words are by Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse Five, but they are put in the mouth of Howard Campbell, an American Nazi ass-clown/traitor:

    https://youtu.be/OixVPcCbcx0

    In other words, you have taken at face value what Vonnegut meant as a ridiculous parody. Even in the 1940s, Americans were not "mainly poor", even by first world standards (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn't dream of owing an automobile, and wouldn't have one (at least not one we would consider to be a "real" car) until decades into the American financed postwar prosperity era). And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Pat Hannagan

    Steve's being nicer to Soros than he deserves.

    , @Anonymous
    @Pat Hannagan

    So … I guess you aren’t rich?

  11. But aren’t the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming ‘racism’ where there isn’t any. Today’s is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term ‘Caucasian’ is weird and should be universally replaced with ‘European’ because it’s racist (Not because it’s just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for ‘white’) she writes this:

    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it’s weird and it’s history is tied up with things she’d consider ‘racist’ but that isn’t it’s use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that’s what on the US census, that’s how police refer to white people and people understand it’s meaning. It’ seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it’s actually a term which makes “claims of white biological superiority” says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America’s upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with ‘science communication’ types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don’t realise this and don’t try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn’t exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it’s a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many ‘race doesn’t exist’ was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we’ve moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it’s racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion “white man bad” and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:

    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.

    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn’t an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    • Thanks: bomag
    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Altai

    There some fat bitches in the photo. Those don't do parkour.

    In any case, you haven't really done parkour until your medical bills reach at least 50 grand excluding dentals.

    , @Captain Tripps
    @Altai

    Can't tell from her various on-line profiles, but if that is her familial surname, it appears religious extremism is baked into her genetic cake.

    , @Anonymous
    @Altai


    Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity blah blah blah
     
    Wasn't that the motto in "Glengarry Glen Ross?" Always Be Co-Leading
    , @AndrewR
    @Altai

    The SJW nonsense will increase every day for the foreseeable future. The collapse of the American empire may or may not stop the descent into the new Dark Ages.

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Altai

    Alice B. Popinjay?

    , @Colin Wright
    @Altai

    '...But aren’t the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day...'

    I can believe Sirhan blanked out. He seems sincere about that.

    Whether that means he was somehow primed to commit the murder or didn't commit it at all is another matter. One aspect of it all I've never heard discussed is whether Sirhan had a history of other such episodes of lost memory before or after the killing. After all, he's presumably been observed over the fifty years since the killing. Has he spaced out again?

    , @Old Brown Fool
    @Altai

    'Caucasian' dates from the time when the Europeans were thought to have appeared in the Caucasus mountains, and spread west to Europe and east to Persia and India. But as our recent studies show, White people appeared in Europe first and then spread to the east to Caucasus, and then again one migration came back into Europe. So, time to discard the term 'Caucasian'. Replacing it with Europeans will be more P.C, but soon it will be even more P.C. to term them as "Old Europeans", as against the New "Europeans" being imported now.

  12. The Washington Post then indulges in a lot of conspiracy theorizing about a Second Gunman. Liberal talk radio in L.A. in the 1970s featured endless RFK conspiracy theorizing (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction).

    I think the easy way to understand the popularity of conspiracy theorizing is that it provides a mental escape hatch when events invalidate a popular belief. For example, 1960s establishment Left-Liberalism included a lot of Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers who were also registered Democrats and supporters of JFK. So when a fellow Communist killed their darling president, they had two choices: 1) consider that their world-view was naïve, false, and wrong, or 2) conspiracy theory. Many opted for 2).

    By contrast, even though MLK’s assassination was much less well witnessed and so seemingly much more open to alternative interpretation, when the authorities came up with a segregationist cracka as the killer a couple of months later, the establishment Left-Liberals just said, “well, of course” and no conspiracy theories were needed, notwithstanding that the accused perp himself was trying to promote one.

    I saw this mechanism in action again after 9/11. Everyone I knew who was a kumbaya, multiculti, we-are-the-world proggie instantly somehow “knew” the the attack was an “inside job”, even though they knew nothing about Islam, Muslims, aircraft, structural steel, or the general fecklessness and incompetence of the US government. But what else were they gonna do? Accept that their prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong? No way! I would sometimes ask these people if they also thought that the Bali bombings, Madrid train bombings, London transport bombings, USS Cole bombing, Moscow theater hostage taking, and various other Islamist shootings and stabbings were all also “inside jobs”? This typically caused them to go suddenly walleyed as they had obviously never thought about it before. They had simply received a psychological shock on 9/11 and needed a quick palliative, and chanting “inside job” while ceasing to think about the subject was it.

    (I write this as a gradual and partial convert to some of what Ron has covered in his American Pravda series. But accepting that American Pravda may have some correct points has required me to accept that some of my prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong. Which is the opposite of what the instant conspiracy theorists described above did.)

    • Agree: Mike Tre, Shel100
    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Almost Missouri

    Best 9/11 conspiracies are those which posit technology to accomplish something that can be perfectly accomplished by driving planes into buildings, said technology not even existing 20 years later. It's as if some gamer who knows about reality by playing Metal Gear is let out of the basement. These got to be smokescreens by TLAs to hide the real conspiracies or else fully deranged people somehow managing to stay in the news for 20 f*cking years.

    - Directed energy weapons!
    - Super special explosives that nobody has ever seen!
    - A nuclear device that doesn't blitz onlookers and leaves no radioactivity!
    - Plasma weapons / Fusion power weapons!
    - There were no planes so the planes are created by holographic projectors! (Huh?)
    - There were planes but they were controlled by remote control!
    - There were planes but some were actually cruise missiles!

    The last two are kinda within the realm of the possible but still deranged.

    Replies: @BB753

    , @J.Ross
    @Almost Missouri

    >Given Muslim bomb-planting
    ... okay ...
    >an airliner should fly like a fighter
    ... nope.
    Conspiracy theory is a false category. No doubt your logic is sound and applies insofar as it does. Conspiracy theory can be thought of as a spectrum, with one end touching undoubted plots to break law (eg, Pontiac's native attempt to imitate European fire ships, or Booth shooting Lincoln, if he did, or the Bolshevik Revolution), the other end at clearly false or impossible conjectures (like the visions of Francis Dec, who may have been faking insanity because of his self-wrought legal troubles), and everything in the middle suffering examination depending on available evidence. If you do that you don't end up with nothing. Given a choice between calling Sydney Schanberg or John McCain a liar, I'm not sure what McCain could have possibly done to make me accuse Schanberg. He did have a nice house ...
    Reliably, the man who asks me to dismiss what he calls "conspiracy theory" loses no time in asking me to fear Russian hackers or Iraqi rocket tubes or Phantom Nazis.

  13. The concept didn’t really emerge until George Habash started pulling off spectacular stunts like hijacking and blowing up three jetliners simultaneously and culminating in the Munich Olympic atrocity in 1972.

    Not to mention PLP-GC bombing Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie (helpfully moved by Wikipedia under Conspiracy Theories; yeah there is also a conspiracy theory that I have salmon in my freezer) in payback for the USS Vincennes aka. “Robocruiser” (apparently because it steamed around behaving a bit erratically as if on meth under “Captain Rogers”) feeling like downing an Iranian Airbus.

    [MORE]

    An interesting bit I hadn’t heard of:

    The Aegis System software at that time reused tracking numbers in its display, constituting a user interface design flaw. The Aegis software initially assigned on-screen identifier TN4474 to Flight 655. Before Vincennes fired, the Aegis software switched the Flight 655 tracking number to TN4131 and recycled Flight 655’s old tracking number of TN4474 to label a fighter jet 110 miles away. When the captain asked for a status on TN4474, he was told it was a fighter and descending. Scientific American rated it as one of the worst user interface disasters.

    As the website of Scientific American is down (how appropriate), MIT course material will serve as a primer on Bad Design.

    Poor decision making

    0633: Capt Rogers orders “all ahead flank” without orders from superiors [OTOH, he _is_ the captain of the ship]
    0840: USS Vincennes is 40 miles north of required position
    0845: Capt Rogers leaves helicopter behind, which follows gunboats north
    0939: Capt Rogers uses ambiguous information as evidence to open fire
    0941: USS Vincennes illegally crosses into Iranian waters

    That’s the kind of spirit that drops Pan Am flights onto my lawn.

    Erroneous Expectancies

    – Memories of USS Stark incident initiated “scenario fulfillment” occurrence
    – Operators claimed the incoming aircraft was descending and picking up speed
    – Anonymous shouts and warnings contributed to tense atmosphere
    – Capt Rogers paid more attention to emergency signals than computer displays
    – Stress, tension, lack of time, and fog and friction of war all contributed to the problem

    Some of those are not system deficiencies but failures you find in any lousily managed office:

    System deficiencies

    – Aegis not intended for small-craft battles in enclosed area like Persian Gulf
    – Combat Information Center (CIC) provided no actual view of the area
    – CIC was dark, and its few lights flickered every time the Vincennes fired at
    speedboats
    – Electronic and verbal confusion in CIC
    – IFF device had to be manually reset
    – Papers and books flew off consoles as ship swung around to bring guns to bear on speedboats
    – Radar displays violated Proximity Compatibility Principle (Wickensand Hollands, 2000) [“when a task requires the integration of multiple sources of information, performance will be best supported when that information is displayed in close proximity” however studies show that “the results indicate that color adheres to the proximity compatibility principle, but that space does not. Instead, the spatial proximity between relevant and irrelevant information appears to be the dominant factor affecting performance across both tasks.”]
    – Duplicate tracking numbers with no computer alert (Fisher, 2001)

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Alfa158
    @El Dato

    That was covered in a documentary, along with other details. It was basically a classic demonstration of serial cock-ups.
    An Iranian F-14 was using the same airport as the airliner. When the airliner took off the tracking computer on the Vincennes erroneously attached the F-14’s military IFF code to the display icon for the airliner. Eventually as the planes got farther apart , the system display corrected and replaced the military IFF code with the civilian flight number. Everyone in the combat control center either never noticed the change, or thought it was still still the Iranian F-14 using a civilian transponder in order to sneak up on the Vincennes.
    As the airliner approached, the display showed the airliner’s altitude, which was increasing. The fire control officer looked at it and saw what he expected to see, that the altitude was dropping as it would with a fighter diving to attack. The Captain was now trying to deal with the air threat, while simultaneously tracking the engagement with the gunboats and getting increasingly frustrated at the failure to score any hits on them. He glanced at the airliner’s display and also thought he saw the altitude dropping.
    A radio operator who was tasked with contacting the threatening aircraft and warning it off, assumed the target was a fighter and used a military frequency, which the airliner couldn’t hear. The radio operator finally switched to a civilian airliner frequency but wasn’t familiar with civilian radio protocol and didn’t reference the airliner flight number. He started calling for “aircraft approaching US ship” to change course or be fired on. All the airplanes in the area heard those radio calls but no one, including the pilots of the Iranian airliner knew who the hell he was talking to.
    One thing that the Navy inquiry conspicuously left out of their report was that Captain Rogers had violated standing orders by entering Iranian waters in pursuit of the gunboats, and otherwise wouldn’t have been in a spot to shoot down the airliner.

  14. Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.

    • LOL: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Morton's toes
    @Jonathan Mason

    He isn't out yet. Political prisoner is bad fate. See Julian Assange.

    There are a million old Jews who think Sirhan did it because he is anti semitic. Is there a prediction market bet?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason


    Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.
     
    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they're releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues - lots of criminals don't age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) - then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    And I'm totally sure that a government that can't - well, won't - prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn't have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach. After all, where would a Middle Easterner find someone in the Middle Eastern community willing to illegally sell him a gun? Middle Eastern immigrants, as we all know, all meticulously stay on the right side of the law.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Jonathan Mason, @Jack Armstrong

  15. Well, RFK’s family knows he’s innocent even if they don’t all care to stick their heads above the parapet – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/26/who-killed-bobby-kennedy-his-son-rfk-jr-doesnt-believe-it-was-sirhan-sirhan/

    Powder burns were found behind his ear, but the Palestinian was nowhere near the back of his head.

    Robert F Kennedy was assassinated by Thane Eugene Cesar, declares RFK Jr, – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

    RFK, no doubt, had strong suspicions about (((who))) offed his brother and was a threat.

    GREAT photo and summary here – https://pulsemedia.org/2009/08/28/the-kennedys-vs-israels-lobby/

    See Michael Piper’s Final Judgment for lots of suppressed “hate” facts – https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Final_Judgment.pdf

    Mr. Unz’s American Pravda series has much to offer, too.

    • Agree: BB753
  16. White lives don’t matter

  17. @Almost Missouri

    The Washington Post then indulges in a lot of conspiracy theorizing about a Second Gunman. Liberal talk radio in L.A. in the 1970s featured endless RFK conspiracy theorizing (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction).
     
    I think the easy way to understand the popularity of conspiracy theorizing is that it provides a mental escape hatch when events invalidate a popular belief. For example, 1960s establishment Left-Liberalism included a lot of Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers who were also registered Democrats and supporters of JFK. So when a fellow Communist killed their darling president, they had two choices: 1) consider that their world-view was naïve, false, and wrong, or 2) conspiracy theory. Many opted for 2).

    By contrast, even though MLK's assassination was much less well witnessed and so seemingly much more open to alternative interpretation, when the authorities came up with a segregationist cracka as the killer a couple of months later, the establishment Left-Liberals just said, "well, of course" and no conspiracy theories were needed, notwithstanding that the accused perp himself was trying to promote one.

    I saw this mechanism in action again after 9/11. Everyone I knew who was a kumbaya, multiculti, we-are-the-world proggie instantly somehow "knew" the the attack was an "inside job", even though they knew nothing about Islam, Muslims, aircraft, structural steel, or the general fecklessness and incompetence of the US government. But what else were they gonna do? Accept that their prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong? No way! I would sometimes ask these people if they also thought that the Bali bombings, Madrid train bombings, London transport bombings, USS Cole bombing, Moscow theater hostage taking, and various other Islamist shootings and stabbings were all also "inside jobs"? This typically caused them to go suddenly walleyed as they had obviously never thought about it before. They had simply received a psychological shock on 9/11 and needed a quick palliative, and chanting "inside job" while ceasing to think about the subject was it.

    (I write this as a gradual and partial convert to some of what Ron has covered in his American Pravda series. But accepting that American Pravda may have some correct points has required me to accept that some of my prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong. Which is the opposite of what the instant conspiracy theorists described above did.)

    Replies: @El Dato, @J.Ross

    Best 9/11 conspiracies are those which posit technology to accomplish something that can be perfectly accomplished by driving planes into buildings, said technology not even existing 20 years later. It’s as if some gamer who knows about reality by playing Metal Gear is let out of the basement. These got to be smokescreens by TLAs to hide the real conspiracies or else fully deranged people somehow managing to stay in the news for 20 f*cking years.

    – Directed energy weapons!
    – Super special explosives that nobody has ever seen!
    – A nuclear device that doesn’t blitz onlookers and leaves no radioactivity!
    – Plasma weapons / Fusion power weapons!
    – There were no planes so the planes are created by holographic projectors! (Huh?)
    – There were planes but they were controlled by remote control!
    – There were planes but some were actually cruise missiles!

    The last two are kinda within the realm of the possible but still deranged.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @El Dato

    You need to watch this documentary. Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.
    https://youtu.be/xEZAXFbAnbA

    Replies: @Art Deco

  18. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    There some fat bitches in the photo. Those don’t do parkour.

    In any case, you haven’t really done parkour until your medical bills reach at least 50 grand excluding dentals.

  19. anonymous[390] • Disclaimer says:

    Thanks for the world’s most hilariously convoluted attempt to shoehorn race into a very simple thing. Sirhan got out because CIA cutout Thane Eugene Cesar kicked the bucket. CIA botched Sirhan’s assassination in 2019, and it’s kind of embarrassing to take a mulligan (though they did it with the WTC.) And Pepper proved CIA did it so they have to let Sirhan out so CIA can kill him easier.

  20. Remember this the next time some Leftist tells you we can abolish the death penalty and replace it with life without parole. They are now actively trying to end life without parole. They won’t even keep the murderer of a Kennedy in prison.

    They can do that because they now effectively have abolished the death penalty. There are annually about 15,000 murders per year (prior to the massive increase in murders last year), and only about a dozen people are executed in the US annually now.

    Their next goal is a massive reduction in the length of sentences, including for murderers, and they are well on their way to accomplishing that. And it’s not necessarily something driven by partisan ideology so much as some naive belief in the idea that murderers can reform themselves – and the automatic assumption that they will reform themselves. I once was mentioned to a Leftist colleague that Anders Breivik, the Norwegian who murdered 77 leftist kids at a political summer camp in, had only received a 10 year sentence, and he was actually cool with that. He assumed Breivik would totally be a reformed man after just 10-20 years in prison.

    In Utah about 100 murders are committed each year, but we haven’t had an execution since 2010 and, if I’m not mistaken, no prosecutor has even attempted to impose the death penalty in over a decade. In 2016 our 80%+ Republican Senate even managed to vote 15-12 to pass a Republican sponsored bill (S.B. 189) to end the death penalty. Fortunately the bill managed to die in the House.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Wilkey


    Remember this the next time some Leftist tells you we can abolish the death penalty and replace it with life without parole. They are now actively trying to end life without parole. They won’t even keep the murderer of a Kennedy in prison.
     
    To not mention Jonathan Pollard.
  21. @NJ Transit Commuter
    I oppose the death penalty, but this is a hell of an argument in favor of it.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @stillCARealist

    Ok Shlomo.

    In 1989, he told David Frost: “My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians.”

    Give the guy a medal

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @AndrewR

    Murderers find it easy to lie.

  22. My understanding is that MLK conspiracy theories have more traction among African Americans, including MLK’s own family. And since the FBI had actually conspired against MLK, it’s understandable to think there are larger forces at work. But in the first world lone wackos really outpunch large organizations in the assassination department.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @TGGP

    That reminds me of the death of Sam Cooke, who was shot in self defense by a woman he assaulted while drunk/high. However his friends/relatives claim he was killed as part of a conspiracy by unknown parties, probably at the instigation of his manager (who after Cooke's death acquired the rights to all of his songs.)

  23. @Jonathan Mason
    Prisons don't really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.

    Replies: @Morton's toes, @Wilkey

    He isn’t out yet. Political prisoner is bad fate. See Julian Assange.

    There are a million old Jews who think Sirhan did it because he is anti semitic. Is there a prediction market bet?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Morton's toes


    There are a million old Jews who think Sirhan did it because he is anti semitic.
     
    This is anti-Semitism:

    In 1989, he told David Frost: “My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians.”
  24. @Jonathan Mason
    Prisons don't really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.

    Replies: @Morton's toes, @Wilkey

    Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.

    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they’re releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues – lots of criminals don’t age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) – then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    And I’m totally sure that a government that can’t – well, won’t – prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn’t have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach. After all, where would a Middle Easterner find someone in the Middle Eastern community willing to illegally sell him a gun? Middle Eastern immigrants, as we all know, all meticulously stay on the right side of the law.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Wilkey

    Yes, they release a lot of elderly prisoners with health issues.

    Replies: @HammerJack

    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Wilkey


    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they’re releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues – lots of criminals don’t age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) – then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.
     
    Have you really studied this issue in depth?

    https://www.caregiver.org/news/unintended-consequence-elderly-prisoners/

    Correctional facilities throughout California have neither the financial or medical resources to deal with the ever-expanding population of elderly prisoners.

    “Prisons were never designed to be geriatric facilities,” stated Jamie Fellner, author of the HRW report. ”Yet US corrections officials now operate old age homes behind bars.”

    In particular, California has experienced a startling increase in the number of inmates aged 55 or older. Between 1990 and 2009, the percentage of older prisoners increased by more than 500 percent.

    The inevitable consequence of these stark numbers is the soaring healthcare costs. On average, the cost of housing for an elderly prisoner in California is nine times higher compared to a young prisoner.

    California is now facing a crisis, not only of overcrowded prisons, but a graying population as well. Prisoners suffering from Alzheimer’s pose a unique challenge for correctional officers.

    The New York Times reports that inmates with dementia often go unnoticed in the overcrowded and understaffed prisons, and at times are responsible for violent disturbances in the facilities. Plagued by paranoia, confusion, and memory loss, some elderly inmates will attack staff and fellow prisoners; a few cannot even recall their crimes.

    And I’m totally sure that a government that can’t – well, won’t – prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn’t have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach.

     

    People are often supervised these days via having a communications device that broadcasts their location locked to their leg. In any case, such a high profile parolee would find it hard to evade supervision. Most likely he would be in some kind of Medicaid residential facility, where his whereabouts would be logged several times daily.

    Anyway, none of us have talked to the guy, let alone professionally evaluated him to know what he is now capable of, or incapable of, any more than we know whether Britney Spears needs court-ordered supervision or not.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Jack D

    , @Jack Armstrong
    @Wilkey

    Sirhan should return to Jerusalem.

    Replies: @Alden

  25. “Their next goal is a massive reduction in the length of sentences, including for murderers, and they are well on their way to accomplishing that.”

    I agree with the main point of your post, but I’m guessing Derek Chauvin, James Fields and that Capitol “rioter” might beg to differ with you about current sentencing practices.

    I know, there’s a distinction to be made between the particular and the general…

  26. @dearieme
    When I was young, people would claim that it was the FBI or CIA who dunnit (whatever outrage "it" might be) and I scoffed.

    Now, with the wisdom of the years, added to the displays by the US Securitate over 9/11, Russiagate, and so on, I begin to suspect that maybe there was more to "it" than met the eye.

    Anyhoo, you might get lucky. Let the bugger out and maybe he'll assassinate some other political creep. At least you could give him a decoration for keeping another Kennedy out of office.

    Replies: @Charlesz Martel, @Harry Baldwin

    Like I always say:

    “If guns are outlawed, how will we kill the Kennedys?”

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Charlesz Martel

    A Secretary and an Oldsmobile?

  27. After all, Sirhan Sirhan merely single-handedly deprived American voters of a major choice in the making of the President 1968. What’s that compared to George Soros’s war on the New Jim Crow?

    What is the evidence that Soros got this prosecutor elected?

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @Anonymous

    His fingerprints are all over the election of this type of DA in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and st. Louis as well as in California. By which I mean he financed the campaigns.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @res
    @Anonymous

    Article about Gascón. Not much explicit evidence given, but if you care so much how about you dig into it?
    https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/george-gascon-rogue-prosecutor-whose-extreme-policies-undermine-the-rule

    Here's some better evidence.
    https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/soros-dumps-another-2-5-million-into-gascons-race-for-los-angeles-da/


    Flash forward to 2020: Soros has already funded more than $2.5 million of George Gascón’s race for Los Angeles District Attorney.
     
  28. @Wilkey
    Remember this the next time some Leftist tells you we can abolish the death penalty and replace it with life without parole. They are now actively trying to end life without parole. They won't even keep the murderer of a Kennedy in prison.

    They can do that because they now effectively have abolished the death penalty. There are annually about 15,000 murders per year (prior to the massive increase in murders last year), and only about a dozen people are executed in the US annually now.

    Their next goal is a massive reduction in the length of sentences, including for murderers, and they are well on their way to accomplishing that. And it's not necessarily something driven by partisan ideology so much as some naive belief in the idea that murderers can reform themselves - and the automatic assumption that they will reform themselves. I once was mentioned to a Leftist colleague that Anders Breivik, the Norwegian who murdered 77 leftist kids at a political summer camp in, had only received a 10 year sentence, and he was actually cool with that. He assumed Breivik would totally be a reformed man after just 10-20 years in prison.

    In Utah about 100 murders are committed each year, but we haven't had an execution since 2010 and, if I'm not mistaken, no prosecutor has even attempted to impose the death penalty in over a decade. In 2016 our 80%+ Republican Senate even managed to vote 15-12 to pass a Republican sponsored bill (S.B. 189) to end the death penalty. Fortunately the bill managed to die in the House.

    Replies: @Anon

    Remember this the next time some Leftist tells you we can abolish the death penalty and replace it with life without parole. They are now actively trying to end life without parole. They won’t even keep the murderer of a Kennedy in prison.

    To not mention Jonathan Pollard.

    • Agree: JMcG
  29. If one reads Soros one is not left with the impression that he’s very smart.

    Occam’s Razor suggests that his wealth flows more from the unique acuteness of his psychopathology – from youth to dotage an unbroken strain of profiting from the misfortune of others en masse and a willingness to cause such misfortune as necessary to generate said profit – than whatever putative intelligence that fails to make it from his brain to his pen.

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
    @Desiderius

    There's no shortage of people who are mostly unaware of the suffering their actions will cause others or who feel they have no other choice, but there are not many world-spanning billionaires.

    Replies: @Hangnail Hans

    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @Desiderius

    It depends on what "smart" means. Doubtless, Soros is a brilliant speculator; on the other hand, his political machinations are evidently a product of a deranged mind.

    Better question is: why is he still around? How come all his NGOs & various misdeeds haven't been publicly unmasked and condemned?

    Replies: @Desiderius

  30. That’s not all they’re in control of. Not easy to find something they’re not.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Desiderius

    Ausfailia and New Madland are two particularly egregious examples. Who would have though that "ZERO COVID" is actually a hare-brained scheme that is a bad fit to anything this universe tells yout? Certainly not the "managerial elites". Fantasy is their domain.

    Fury over Covid rules is FINALLY helping Aussies lose their long-held, unhealthy respect for authority


    Then there are the stern warnings from state leaders that would be hilarious if they weren’t so serious – about enjoying sunset on the beach, removing a mask to drink beer, dodging errant footballs while watching a game, and most recently, a local council deciding to shoot 15 rescue dogs rather than allow volunteers from an animal shelter to travel for their collection in case they spread the virus.

    That’s the level of insanity we’re looking at.
     
  31. • Thanks: Charon
    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Desiderius

    So Biden (and Harris) are French's examples of "character and competence."

    , @El Dato
    @Desiderius

    David French's deep thoughts a like the deep grooves of my bike tires: they collect random stuff that's not easy to look at.

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand? The basic configuration of "Who says what to whom apropos what and why" is sometimes entirely unscrutable. It's like an existentialist theatre piece written by Sartre in not his best moments.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius, @J.Ross

  32. Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of Robert F. Kennedy assassination, seeks parole with no opposition from prosecutors

    That seems fair, given that he may not have actually shot RFK in the first place.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Mr. Anon

    He shot Kennedy.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Mr. Anon

  33. @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason


    Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.
     
    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they're releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues - lots of criminals don't age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) - then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    And I'm totally sure that a government that can't - well, won't - prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn't have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach. After all, where would a Middle Easterner find someone in the Middle Eastern community willing to illegally sell him a gun? Middle Eastern immigrants, as we all know, all meticulously stay on the right side of the law.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Jonathan Mason, @Jack Armstrong

    Yes, they release a lot of elderly prisoners with health issues.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @Jonathan Mason

    Has your date been fixed then?

  34. Dear Steve,

    Yes, if we were on the Parole Board, we would not let Sirhan Sirhan out of jail!

    No political killer should walk around a free man (or woman)- not in today’s America!

    Thankfully, Steve, assassinations are now part of our past, and in today’s America we just have to worry about ‘suicides’ and robberies on the streets of DC ‘going wrong’…

    Yours,

    Bill and Hillary Killton

  35. Kennedys have no traction, when was the last time one was considered for a political office? Today’s dems don’t invoke JFK, too centrist, after all, asking …” what can you do for your country” and not the reverse. Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, avowed radical communists and members of the terrorist Weather Underground, mentors of obama and surrogate parents to San Francisco DA, chesa boudin, dedicated their communist manifesto, “Prairie Fire” to Sirhan Sirhan. And these people still have clout. boudin’s father, convicted of Second Degree murder for his role in a robbery to fund the Weather Underground, was just granted clemency by andrew cuomo. Interesting thread that runs through all these people.

    • Replies: @Brutusale
    @Buffalo Joe

    Careful, Joe, don't jinx us! We just got rid of one of the assholes 2 years ago.

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/01/joe-kennedy-iii-loses-to-incumbent-ed-markey-in-dem-primary/

    Kennedys are like cockroaches; step on one and three more pop up!

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Art Deco

    , @ScarletNumber
    @Buffalo Joe

    Amy Kennedy was one of only two Democrats to lose election to Congress in New Jersey in 2020. She is married to former congressman Patrick, who is Teddy's son.

  36. OT

    NGO workers aren’t stupid. Nor are Bill and Melinda Gates.

    More than 60 NGOs call for spending rule change, saying people on frontline of climate crisis want greater access to reproductive healthcare

    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/aug/26/use-your-11bn-climate-fund-to-pay-for-family-planning-uk-told

    Basically, spend money to reduce African population growth to combat climate change, poverty and other problems.

    It seems that everyone wants what would be the effects of a One Child policy for Africa and everyone wants richer Africans. Fortunately, these two would go together

  37. @Desiderius
    If one reads Soros one is not left with the impression that he's very smart.

    Occam's Razor suggests that his wealth flows more from the unique acuteness of his psychopathology - from youth to dotage an unbroken strain of profiting from the misfortune of others en masse and a willingness to cause such misfortune as necessary to generate said profit - than whatever putative intelligence that fails to make it from his brain to his pen.

    Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @Bardon Kaldian

    There’s no shortage of people who are mostly unaware of the suffering their actions will cause others or who feel they have no other choice, but there are not many world-spanning billionaires.

    • Replies: @Hangnail Hans
    @Triteleia Laxa

    This one was particularly focused, and unusually malevolent. Not so much "unaware" about the sufferings of others, but uncaring. Somehow I think you understand.

  38. @Jonathan Mason
    @Wilkey

    Yes, they release a lot of elderly prisoners with health issues.

    Replies: @HammerJack

    Has your date been fixed then?

  39. @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason


    Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.
     
    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they're releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues - lots of criminals don't age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) - then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    And I'm totally sure that a government that can't - well, won't - prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn't have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach. After all, where would a Middle Easterner find someone in the Middle Eastern community willing to illegally sell him a gun? Middle Eastern immigrants, as we all know, all meticulously stay on the right side of the law.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Jonathan Mason, @Jack Armstrong

    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they’re releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues – lots of criminals don’t age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) – then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    Have you really studied this issue in depth?

    https://www.caregiver.org/news/unintended-consequence-elderly-prisoners/

    Correctional facilities throughout California have neither the financial or medical resources to deal with the ever-expanding population of elderly prisoners.

    “Prisons were never designed to be geriatric facilities,” stated Jamie Fellner, author of the HRW report. ”Yet US corrections officials now operate old age homes behind bars.”

    In particular, California has experienced a startling increase in the number of inmates aged 55 or older. Between 1990 and 2009, the percentage of older prisoners increased by more than 500 percent.

    The inevitable consequence of these stark numbers is the soaring healthcare costs. On average, the cost of housing for an elderly prisoner in California is nine times higher compared to a young prisoner.

    California is now facing a crisis, not only of overcrowded prisons, but a graying population as well. Prisoners suffering from Alzheimer’s pose a unique challenge for correctional officers.

    The New York Times reports that inmates with dementia often go unnoticed in the overcrowded and understaffed prisons, and at times are responsible for violent disturbances in the facilities. Plagued by paranoia, confusion, and memory loss, some elderly inmates will attack staff and fellow prisoners; a few cannot even recall their crimes.

    And I’m totally sure that a government that can’t – well, won’t – prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn’t have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach.

    People are often supervised these days via having a communications device that broadcasts their location locked to their leg. In any case, such a high profile parolee would find it hard to evade supervision. Most likely he would be in some kind of Medicaid residential facility, where his whereabouts would be logged several times daily.

    Anyway, none of us have talked to the guy, let alone professionally evaluated him to know what he is now capable of, or incapable of, any more than we know whether Britney Spears needs court-ordered supervision or not.

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason

    Not sure what you’re point is? We’re going to be paying these healthcare costs whether they are in prison or not. If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid. I guess they should have thought about this when they stopped executing murderers.

    Replies: @Boy the way Glenn Miller played, @TWS

    , @Jack D
    @Jonathan Mason

    Sirhan's brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.

    Democrats waste trillions of $ on all sorts of worthless shit, so pardon me if I think that their sudden concern for finances is not sincere. If it costs the treasury a few $ to keep some elderly prisoners in prison instead of in a government financed nursing home, this is a small price to pay for the deterrent effect of a life sentence. Ideally, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will take yours" (California in fact has the death penalty on the books to this day, passed repeatedly by referendum, but the POS governor refuses to carry out the law). But, barring that, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will never allow you to walk the streets again, even if you live to 120. Consider that before you pull the trigger." Letting Sirhan and other elderly prisoners go muddles that message. It says once again (as if it hasn't been demonstrated often enough) that the government cannot be trusted to keep its promises.

    This is all part of the Democrat frog boiling method. First they promise us, "if you get rid of the death penalty, we'll impose life in prison without parole instead - it's just as good." Then if the sucker voters take the bait, the next step is "sorry, just kidding. We can't actually afford to keep people in prison for their entire life so we have to let them go when they become elderly." The next step is playing with the definition of "elderly" - first you set it to 75, then 70, then 65, etc. You boil the frog slowly.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @clifford brown

  40. @dearieme
    When I was young, people would claim that it was the FBI or CIA who dunnit (whatever outrage "it" might be) and I scoffed.

    Now, with the wisdom of the years, added to the displays by the US Securitate over 9/11, Russiagate, and so on, I begin to suspect that maybe there was more to "it" than met the eye.

    Anyhoo, you might get lucky. Let the bugger out and maybe he'll assassinate some other political creep. At least you could give him a decoration for keeping another Kennedy out of office.

    Replies: @Charlesz Martel, @Harry Baldwin

    I just listened to Joe Rogan’s almost 3 hour interview with Tom O’Neill about his book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. If O’Neill’s research doesn’t persuade you that the CIA is capable of anything, nothing will.

    https://jrelibrary.com/1459-tom-oneill/

    What gets me is that Rogan will say, “Wow, they were up to some crazy shit back then.” Back then?! What about the last five years?

    • Agree: Sick 'n Tired
    • Replies: @DCThrowback
    @Harry Baldwin

    That interview was great and is required listening for anyone interested in the CIA, MK-Ultra and the 1960s and 1970s. O'Neill is so careful to say this is what I can prove and this is what my guess is; very clarifying. He can put Manson and West in SF at the same time and roughly the same place but can't physically put them in the same room. Maybe someday.

    Some people need more evidence that intel services have developed capabilities that are beyond what we can rationally accept. Derren Brown provides some.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkLZDY9ilg4

    Replies: @Brutusale

    , @JimDandy
    @Harry Baldwin

    Great book, which I was turned on to by an Unz article. Doesn't this dead Kennedy's son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Paul Jolliffe

    , @anon
    @Harry Baldwin

    This is just Wikipedia, so accuracy is not at all guaranteed. Yet even here it can be seen what was done in the US and Canada as part of the MK-Ultra program. Donald Cameron was an evil man. His evil clearly lives on.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron

    On topic: was Sirhan Sirhan just an angry Arab, or was he one of the early MK-Ultra windup toys turned loose for a purpose?

    If he was crazy 50+ years ago, is he sane now? Or if he was sane and criminal 50+ years ago, is he still sane?

  41. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    Can’t tell from her various on-line profiles, but if that is her familial surname, it appears religious extremism is baked into her genetic cake.

  42. What would interest Sirhan in Palm Beach? Mar-a-Lago? I believe the Kennedys sold Joe’s house after pantless Teddy was revealed.

  43. Anon[188] • Disclaimer says:

    It doesn’t matter what the Soros DA does this time. There is no way the parole board will let Sirhan go. Democrats still believe in the myth of the Kennedy greatness, and California is filled with Kennedy Democrats.

    Democrats believe in being very malicious to their enemies, and Sirhan is an enemy for interrupting the Kennedy presidential dynasty.

    • Disagree: RadicalCenter
  44. Anonymous[579] • Disclaimer says:

    …a setup to give embattled Gov. Gavin Newsom a political win… But I think people like Gascon do stupid stuff [snip]

    How much power does either have over the parole board? I’m guessing not much (L.A. County having been founded by Midwest refugees miffed over that style of 1890s city-politics arm-twisting). Schwarzenegger commuted the former state Assembly speaker’s son’s sentence, a kickback he got nothing out of, other than getting to finally admit the legislature machine is in charge.

    Gascon isn’t doing anyone a favor, though I wouldn’t aggrandize it to the status of “chess move” — it’s discipline-and-punish as Foucault would say. This passive-aggressive sit-out pleases the D.A.’s “constituency,” as such, and makes life bad for people outside it as a bonus. No naivete required

  45. and 9-year-old me thinking, “No, Rafer Johnson helped get the gun away from the assassin.”

    Origin story of Steve’s suspicion of The Narrative.

  46. A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Paleo Liberal

    According to Bernice King, all white people murdered her dad, including the >60% of us who weren't alive when he died

    https://mobile.twitter.com/BerniceKing/status/1299340664409395202

    , @Art Deco
    @Paleo Liberal

    It's not interesting. It's just stupid.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    , @J.Ross
    @Paleo Liberal

    Problem: why would a wet team check in under their proper names? Did they also register their gun serial numbers?
    The strongest negative case is that the guy who is supposed to have done it should not have been able to -- he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I'm not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Art Deco

    , @kaganovitch
    @Paleo Liberal

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    As a Native American you should have known " Black man speak with forked tongue".

    , @Gamecock
    @Paleo Liberal


    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.
     
    Seems hoky to me.

    BUT, I can offer a somewhat plausible theory linking the assassinations of JFK and RFK.

    A prime candidate for who was behind the murder of JFK is Santo Trafficante, Jr. Indeed, I have no doubt it was him. So why was the mob after JFK? The big theory is that Kennedy messed up getting Castro kicked out in Cuba. The mafia wanted their casinos in Havana back.

    BWTM: The mob supported Kennedy, expecting him to take it easy on them. But his damn little brother, as Attorney General, came after them hard.

    Years later, the mob still didn't like Bobby, and sure as heck didn't want him to be President. Winning the California primary signed Bobby's death certificate.
  47. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity blah blah blah

    Wasn’t that the motto in “Glengarry Glen Ross?” Always Be Co-Leading

  48. @Triteleia Laxa
    @Desiderius

    There's no shortage of people who are mostly unaware of the suffering their actions will cause others or who feel they have no other choice, but there are not many world-spanning billionaires.

    Replies: @Hangnail Hans

    This one was particularly focused, and unusually malevolent. Not so much “unaware” about the sufferings of others, but uncaring. Somehow I think you understand.

  49. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    The science on this is already settled

  50. For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Powerful People (e.g. mysterious three letter agencies and their backers) start wars, poison the populace for profits, and do other dastardly deeds. Who suffers? The middle class suffers.

    Woke Warriors (e.g. the Soroses, the Zucks, the Bezes et al) react against the dastardly deeds done to oppressed class by engaging in their own wars of righteousness for the Putative victims of Powerful People. Who suffers? The middle class suffers.

    Rich man’s war, poor man’s fight.

  51. @Paleo Liberal
    A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Art Deco, @J.Ross, @kaganovitch, @Gamecock

    According to Bernice King, all white people murdered her dad, including the >60% of us who weren’t alive when he died

    https://mobile.twitter.com/BerniceKing/status/1299340664409395202

  52. @Ron Unz – do you have anything to say about Sithan’s purported guilt in this case or his imminent release from prison?

  53. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    The SJW nonsense will increase every day for the foreseeable future. The collapse of the American empire may or may not stop the descent into the new Dark Ages.

  54. For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Getting guys like Chesa Boudin and Larry Krasner and Keith Ellison elected as DA or Attorney General is obviously just evil. Is being evil Soros’s motivation? Does he have some reason to want to do as much harm as he can to normal Americans? Or is he a frontman for somebody else, maybe the Chinese? I admit that Soros being a frontman for the Chinese is a crazy conspiracy theory, but I suspect there is some crazy stuff involving Soros that we have no inkling of.

  55. @NJ Transit Commuter
    I oppose the death penalty, but this is a hell of an argument in favor of it.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @stillCARealist

    I support the death penalty and this is one of my many arguments in favor of it.

  56. @El Dato

    The concept didn’t really emerge until George Habash started pulling off spectacular stunts like hijacking and blowing up three jetliners simultaneously and culminating in the Munich Olympic atrocity in 1972.
     
    Not to mention PLP-GC bombing Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie (helpfully moved by Wikipedia under Conspiracy Theories; yeah there is also a conspiracy theory that I have salmon in my freezer) in payback for the USS Vincennes aka. "Robocruiser" (apparently because it steamed around behaving a bit erratically as if on meth under "Captain Rogers") feeling like downing an Iranian Airbus.

    An interesting bit I hadn't heard of:


    The Aegis System software at that time reused tracking numbers in its display, constituting a user interface design flaw. The Aegis software initially assigned on-screen identifier TN4474 to Flight 655. Before Vincennes fired, the Aegis software switched the Flight 655 tracking number to TN4131 and recycled Flight 655's old tracking number of TN4474 to label a fighter jet 110 miles away. When the captain asked for a status on TN4474, he was told it was a fighter and descending. Scientific American rated it as one of the worst user interface disasters.
     
    As the website of Scientific American is down (how appropriate), MIT course material will serve as a primer on Bad Design.

    Poor decision making

    0633: Capt Rogers orders “all ahead flank” without orders from superiors [OTOH, he _is_ the captain of the ship]
    0840: USS Vincennes is 40 miles north of required position
    0845: Capt Rogers leaves helicopter behind, which follows gunboats north
    0939: Capt Rogers uses ambiguous information as evidence to open fire
    0941: USS Vincennes illegally crosses into Iranian waters
     

    That's the kind of spirit that drops Pan Am flights onto my lawn.

    Erroneous Expectancies

    - Memories of USS Stark incident initiated “scenario fulfillment” occurrence
    - Operators claimed the incoming aircraft was descending and picking up speed
    - Anonymous shouts and warnings contributed to tense atmosphere
    - Capt Rogers paid more attention to emergency signals than computer displays
    - Stress, tension, lack of time, and fog and friction of war all contributed to the problem
     

    Some of those are not system deficiencies but failures you find in any lousily managed office:

    System deficiencies

    - Aegis not intended for small-craft battles in enclosed area like Persian Gulf
    - Combat Information Center (CIC) provided no actual view of the area
    - CIC was dark, and its few lights flickered every time the Vincennes fired at
    speedboats
    - Electronic and verbal confusion in CIC
    - IFF device had to be manually reset
    - Papers and books flew off consoles as ship swung around to bring guns to bear on speedboats
    - Radar displays violated Proximity Compatibility Principle (Wickensand Hollands, 2000) ["when a task requires the integration of multiple sources of information, performance will be best supported when that information is displayed in close proximity" however studies show that "the results indicate that color adheres to the proximity compatibility principle, but that space does not. Instead, the spatial proximity between relevant and irrelevant information appears to be the dominant factor affecting performance across both tasks."]
    - Duplicate tracking numbers with no computer alert (Fisher, 2001)

     

    Replies: @Alfa158

    That was covered in a documentary, along with other details. It was basically a classic demonstration of serial cock-ups.
    An Iranian F-14 was using the same airport as the airliner. When the airliner took off the tracking computer on the Vincennes erroneously attached the F-14’s military IFF code to the display icon for the airliner. Eventually as the planes got farther apart , the system display corrected and replaced the military IFF code with the civilian flight number. Everyone in the combat control center either never noticed the change, or thought it was still still the Iranian F-14 using a civilian transponder in order to sneak up on the Vincennes.
    As the airliner approached, the display showed the airliner’s altitude, which was increasing. The fire control officer looked at it and saw what he expected to see, that the altitude was dropping as it would with a fighter diving to attack. The Captain was now trying to deal with the air threat, while simultaneously tracking the engagement with the gunboats and getting increasingly frustrated at the failure to score any hits on them. He glanced at the airliner’s display and also thought he saw the altitude dropping.
    A radio operator who was tasked with contacting the threatening aircraft and warning it off, assumed the target was a fighter and used a military frequency, which the airliner couldn’t hear. The radio operator finally switched to a civilian airliner frequency but wasn’t familiar with civilian radio protocol and didn’t reference the airliner flight number. He started calling for “aircraft approaching US ship” to change course or be fired on. All the airplanes in the area heard those radio calls but no one, including the pilots of the Iranian airliner knew who the hell he was talking to.
    One thing that the Navy inquiry conspicuously left out of their report was that Captain Rogers had violated standing orders by entering Iranian waters in pursuit of the gunboats, and otherwise wouldn’t have been in a spot to shoot down the airliner.

  57. He’s been in prison for 53 years. He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun and guilty of political assassination. Whether he qualifies for parole or not should depend on whether or not he has served the mandatory minimum (he apparently has) and the degree to which he has been a disciplinary problem in prison.

    The real outrage is the commutation granted Chesa Boudin’s father in New York. If New York had a sane schedule of penalties, participation in an armed robbery which resulted in the deaths of three people would bring down a capital sentence on all of the participants. Chesa’s papa should have been put in front of a firing squad 30+ years ago.

    Remember Emily Harris of the Symbionese Liberation Army fame? She was a participant in one kidnapping for ransom (no clue about about California; that’s an A-I felony in New York) and three armed robberies. She’s likely guilty of harboring two men guilty of one premeditated murder and one attempted murder. Most importantly, she murdered a pregnant woman in the course of one of those armed robberies. This array of crimes should have sufficed to get her locked up for about 50 years if not executed. She actually served 12 years. For whatever reason, the felony murder rule was never applied to her and it took the Stupidstan of California 27 years to prosecute her for the murder of Myrna Opsahl; she was permitted to plead and paroled after four years. Our judiciary is a a scandal.

    • Agree: JMcG, TWS, donut
    • Thanks: Buffalo Joe
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Art Deco


    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun
     
    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer's Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan's disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @anon, @Art Deco, @JimDandyAbroad

    , @Alden
    @Art Deco

    As soon as Emily Harris got out of prison her defense attorney hired her to work as a paralegal. Her fellow murderer and terrorist husband / boyfriend too.

    , @Hibernian
    @Art Deco

    "..and guilty of political assassination."

    For which he should have gotten death and should now serve for life.

  58. @Paleo Liberal
    A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Art Deco, @J.Ross, @kaganovitch, @Gamecock

    It’s not interesting. It’s just stupid.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @Art Deco

    "It's just stupid."

    When are you going to release the pix you took at Roddy McDowall's Escape from the Planet of the Apes wrap party? How did you get your mind so nice and tidy? Did you receive my recent Ancient Aliens newsletter? Tell Steve I have more potatoes than eggs this month so I'll be sending him five pounds of potato salad.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  59. @Ralph L

    the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. president, Huey Long in 1935,
     
    I believe you mean senator, not president.

    No question the MLK and RFK killings had hugely bad impacts on the US, and I don't care for either man. The man who shot at FDR early in '33 was executed before his inaugural or soon after. We shouldn't mess around with political murder. OTOH, the man who shot Scalise was quickly dead and his crime forgotten by most.

    Replies: @stillCARealist, @Verymuchalive, @Chris Mallory, @Hibernian

    How about this guy?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Collazo

    Sentenced to death, but given life thanks to Truman (the target of the assassination attempt). Then let out by good ‘ol Jimmy Carter and decorated by Castro.

  60. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    By no international or historical standard are ‘the people’ in this country ‘mainly poor’.

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    @Art Deco

    The poor in the US should be judged by the standards of the US, not international standards. We are Americans, we are better than the rest of the world.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  61. If I were Sirhan x2 I’d be memorizing Morgan Freebird’s speech from Shawshank.

    I would also have a poster of Duran Duran in my cell and a Little Caesar’s “Pizza Pizza!” box cover.

    • Replies: @Pratt
    @Sick of Orcs

    What kind of name is "Sirhan Sirhan" anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for "I'm going to assassinate a kafir"? What's behind this bizarrerie?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @Alden

  62. @Desiderius
    If one reads Soros one is not left with the impression that he's very smart.

    Occam's Razor suggests that his wealth flows more from the unique acuteness of his psychopathology - from youth to dotage an unbroken strain of profiting from the misfortune of others en masse and a willingness to cause such misfortune as necessary to generate said profit - than whatever putative intelligence that fails to make it from his brain to his pen.

    Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @Bardon Kaldian

    It depends on what “smart” means. Doubtless, Soros is a brilliant speculator; on the other hand, his political machinations are evidently a product of a deranged mind.

    Better question is: why is he still around? How come all his NGOs & various misdeeds haven’t been publicly unmasked and condemned?

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Is he brilliant? How brilliant did one have to be to profit from the Nahtzee despoilage of his own homeland? To short the pound while simultaneously crashing it? Many such cases.

    Doesn't take brilliance if you've got no scruples and enough ill-gotten gains to leverage.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

  63. I’m not sure RFK represented any great choice in ’68. He had no brilliant ideas on exiting Vietnam, meaning the war would have continued just as it did. His support for Israel in their lebensraum project was pretty shocking in 1968 given that the entire U.S. State Dept. (and official U.S. policy) was opposed to that land grab, although to be fair the government’s cover up on the USS Liberty showed who was really running things. RFK understood all this. Lots of “liberal” Jews in NY cried when he got shot, guys like Jack Newfield…RFK was their puppet and expert goy manipulator.

    So why not release Sirhan. The Brits released Pan Am 103 bomber Megrahi after 8 1/2 years in prison, then told Americans who complained to fuck off.

    • Replies: @Peterike
    @Bragadocious

    “ His support for Israel in their lebensraum project was pretty shocking in 1968 given that the entire U.S. State Dept. (and official U.S. policy) was opposed to that land grab”

    He knew who whacked his brother.

  64. Most of the Men Of UNZ believe Sirhan Sirhan didn’t kill Kennedy. It was an Illuminati/ Satanist operative named Thane Cesar working for the Zionists Vatican CIA Bilderberg Group Council on Foreign Relations Davis Group Fugger Frescobaldi and Rothschild
    families the conspirators who killed his brother President Kennedy the military industrial complex and and various others.

    So what’s the problem? .

  65. “Ok, but Sirhan Sirhan still is the same person who committed an atrocious crime.”

    The person who committed the crime was Thane Caesar who, at that time, was employed at Hughes Aircraft in Burbank.

    “although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction”

    The MLK murder is indeed curious and got plenty of traction outside conventional wisdomist circles.

    “So, back then Sirhan was just some implausible-sounding Lone Wolf”

    Like the other two infamous lone wolf political assassins of the 1960s — LH Oswald and James Earl Ray — Sirhan had a number of groomers around him before the killing. Shadowy characters with sketchy employment histories who always seemed to have access to large sums of money. Characters who faded back into the woodwork after the killing.

  66. Soros has done more damage to the US than mustache guy ever did. Yet he still is welcome here.

  67. Breaking news, officials confirm that Sirhan had no involvement with the murder of Emmett Till.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Jack Armstrong

    Wait, are we totally sure about that? Isn't more investigation still required?

    Oh, wait, silly me. Sirhan^2 is a Person of Color! Of course he wasn't involved!

  68. Anonymous[138] • Disclaimer says:

    I would say they are not opposing his release precisely because he was a Palestinian terrorist. There is no sympathy for Kennedy and much less for the American people by our multi-culti Woke elite. But there would be a great deal of sympathy for a Palestinian terrorist.

    As for Mr. Sirhan, his supporters have predictably both declared his innocence and stated that he has expressed remorse and so should be released.

    But count on this, if released this murderer will be lionized upon release by the people proclaiming his innocence. He will be considered a hero. A hero for what exactly?

  69. @Art Deco
    @Paleo Liberal

    It's not interesting. It's just stupid.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    “It’s just stupid.”

    When are you going to release the pix you took at Roddy McDowall’s Escape from the Planet of the Apes wrap party? How did you get your mind so nice and tidy? Did you receive my recent Ancient Aliens newsletter? Tell Steve I have more potatoes than eggs this month so I’ll be sending him five pounds of potato salad.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @SunBakedSuburb

    Come in from the sun.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

  70. @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason


    Prisons don’t really want to take care of 77 year olds because they often require expensive outside medical consultations. They would rather free up a cell for a younger and more deserving prisoner. Mister Sirhan can probably be supervised by probation services. He will not be allowed to have a gun, and he will not be allowed to vacation in Palm Beach, Florida.
     
    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they're releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues - lots of criminals don't age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) - then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.

    And I'm totally sure that a government that can't - well, won't - prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn't have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach. After all, where would a Middle Easterner find someone in the Middle Eastern community willing to illegally sell him a gun? Middle Eastern immigrants, as we all know, all meticulously stay on the right side of the law.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Jonathan Mason, @Jack Armstrong

    Sirhan should return to Jerusalem.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Jack Armstrong

    He can’t. The Jews confiscated his family home in Jerusalem and the families’ farms outside Jerusalem. Farms in 1947 and family home in 1948.

    A heavily armed group of Zionists Israeli army thugs broke into the home the family OWNED. The family was given one hour to clear out with only as much as they could carry by hand. 7 kids youngest was 4 year old Sirhan Sirhan. Family found refuge in a Greek Orthodox pilgrimage hostel established 1,600 years before the Russian jews invaded Palestine. The Sirhans weren’t the only family treated like this. The entire non Jewish population of Palestine was treated like this.

    How’d you like that to happen to you? Or do you think bible thumper preacher Zionist James’s Hagee will save you because you’re an OT wanna be Jew?
    That’s why Sirhan can’t go back to Jerusalem.

  71. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    At this point, I don’t know anymore if it’s disingenuity or cluelessness by Steve.

    “Ruin his reputation in old age”??
    When in Hell Soros had a “reputation” to ruin?
    In his youth when he was helping confiscate property from his fellow Jews?
    Or in 1992 when the shorted the British pound?

    And Steve does the same thing dismissing the “not so great reset” as just a silly idea by billionaires that for some reason are acting like bumbling morons who don’t know what they were doing.

    Probably, Steve sucks up to rich and famous and smart, high-status people, because he wishes he was as rich and famous and smart and high-status as them; and so he tries to protect their “reputation”.

    But to paint them as dumb morons who somehow don’t know what they are doing, or that they are engaging in evil stuff “by accident” or “by mistake”, is just embarrassing.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Dumbo

    Steve is unable to contemplate that some people are plain evil. And that our elite is truly evil and has always been so. Some prefer the term "predator class" to elite.

    , @Pat Hannagan
    @Dumbo

    Preach it, mate.

    It's a fascinating aspect about Sailer, who is otherwise a first rate intellect.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H14b3yFoBQ

    Yet, of all the 2nd rate HBD intellects at Unz, Sailer remains two standard deviations above.

  72. @Flip
    "Did the CIA kill Bobby Kennedy?"

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/nov/20/usa.features11

    Replies: @Alden

    You cite The Guardian? Voice of the Communist Party of Great Britain since the party was founded? Nowadays devotes itself to the genocide of the native White people of the U.K. and replacement by black and browns governed by sharia law?

    You are a retarded brainwashed loathsome liberal moron. Probably think Cuba is the most prosperous nation in the Americas because of Castro. Probably donate To BLM Probably donated to Obama worked on his campaign and voted for him. The Guardian

    Typical Man of UNZ . No ability to think for himself. Just ask google and cite the first loathsome liberal propaganda that shows up.

    The Guardian You Might as well cite The Forward, The Nation and The Daily Worker. Or Mark Lane.

  73. @Almost Missouri

    The Washington Post then indulges in a lot of conspiracy theorizing about a Second Gunman. Liberal talk radio in L.A. in the 1970s featured endless RFK conspiracy theorizing (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction).
     
    I think the easy way to understand the popularity of conspiracy theorizing is that it provides a mental escape hatch when events invalidate a popular belief. For example, 1960s establishment Left-Liberalism included a lot of Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers who were also registered Democrats and supporters of JFK. So when a fellow Communist killed their darling president, they had two choices: 1) consider that their world-view was naïve, false, and wrong, or 2) conspiracy theory. Many opted for 2).

    By contrast, even though MLK's assassination was much less well witnessed and so seemingly much more open to alternative interpretation, when the authorities came up with a segregationist cracka as the killer a couple of months later, the establishment Left-Liberals just said, "well, of course" and no conspiracy theories were needed, notwithstanding that the accused perp himself was trying to promote one.

    I saw this mechanism in action again after 9/11. Everyone I knew who was a kumbaya, multiculti, we-are-the-world proggie instantly somehow "knew" the the attack was an "inside job", even though they knew nothing about Islam, Muslims, aircraft, structural steel, or the general fecklessness and incompetence of the US government. But what else were they gonna do? Accept that their prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong? No way! I would sometimes ask these people if they also thought that the Bali bombings, Madrid train bombings, London transport bombings, USS Cole bombing, Moscow theater hostage taking, and various other Islamist shootings and stabbings were all also "inside jobs"? This typically caused them to go suddenly walleyed as they had obviously never thought about it before. They had simply received a psychological shock on 9/11 and needed a quick palliative, and chanting "inside job" while ceasing to think about the subject was it.

    (I write this as a gradual and partial convert to some of what Ron has covered in his American Pravda series. But accepting that American Pravda may have some correct points has required me to accept that some of my prior beliefs were naïve, false, and wrong. Which is the opposite of what the instant conspiracy theorists described above did.)

    Replies: @El Dato, @J.Ross

    >Given Muslim bomb-planting
    … okay …
    >an airliner should fly like a fighter
    … nope.
    Conspiracy theory is a false category. No doubt your logic is sound and applies insofar as it does. Conspiracy theory can be thought of as a spectrum, with one end touching undoubted plots to break law (eg, Pontiac’s native attempt to imitate European fire ships, or Booth shooting Lincoln, if he did, or the Bolshevik Revolution), the other end at clearly false or impossible conjectures (like the visions of Francis Dec, who may have been faking insanity because of his self-wrought legal troubles), and everything in the middle suffering examination depending on available evidence. If you do that you don’t end up with nothing. Given a choice between calling Sydney Schanberg or John McCain a liar, I’m not sure what McCain could have possibly done to make me accuse Schanberg. He did have a nice house …
    Reliably, the man who asks me to dismiss what he calls “conspiracy theory” loses no time in asking me to fear Russian hackers or Iraqi rocket tubes or Phantom Nazis.

  74. @Paleo Liberal
    A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Art Deco, @J.Ross, @kaganovitch, @Gamecock

    Problem: why would a wet team check in under their proper names? Did they also register their gun serial numbers?
    The strongest negative case is that the guy who is supposed to have done it should not have been able to — he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I’m not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
    @J.Ross

    You make an excellent point.

    People often believe what they want to believe.

    Here is an alternate explanation:

    J. Edgar Hoover was not a fan of MLK, and kept him under constant surveillance. By coincidence, some agents sent to watch after MLK on that particular event had previously been assigned to Dallas for JFK’s visit.

    Coincidence sometimes happens. Sometimes news reports surface of people who, Forest Gump style, somehow wind up at infamous events more than once.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    , @Art Deco
    @J.Ross

    he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I’m not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    He escaped from the Missouri State Penitentiary in April 1967. It's about a 6.5 hour drive from the Lorraine Motel. His attorney, Percy Foreman, asked later said he'd grilled his client for hours and hours on his travels and his expenditures ("down to the last two bits for a shave and a haircut") and concluded his travels could have been financed by his accumulated savings.

  75. Abolish the drug war and eliminate the profit element. Then the drug gangs (not Big Pharma) will move on to other pursuits.

    An overall reduction in the level of violence will reduce the in-flow of felons, thereby ending the scam of parole as a means to de-overcrowd prisons.

    A_p_e will produce similar effects.

    • Agree: Gamecock
    • Replies: @anon
    @Abolish_public_education

    Abolish the drug war and eliminate the profit element. Then the drug gangs (not Big Pharma) will move on to other pursuits.

    Legalizing pot in California does not appear to have affected those cartels that grow illegal weed in the National Forests. They are still doing it, and polluting watercourses in the process. Why do you suppose that is?

    Replies: @Abolish_public_education

  76. @Achmed E. Newman
    There are lots of conspiracies associated with a number of those problem-child Kennedies. There's got to be ONE of them that is right for JFK, as there are so many reasons certain people - Deep State, anybody? - WOULD have been out to get him, the odds are just not likely that none of them are the case. I wish his assassination hadn't resulted in the rise of the Socialist Scumbag LBJ, but all of these guys were missing a Conservative "gene" so to speak.

    For the rest of the "Clan", well, the men are just a bunch of accident-prone screw ups. Skiing into trees, not knowing how to fly instruments in straight-and-level flight when you've been taught for 10 or more hours, driving drunk off bridges (and leaving her to SUFFOCATE)., etc. It's not an accident when a whole family is accident-prone. They were just not prudent people, hence not Conservatives at heart.

    The best thing since JFK Jr, kicked it (and nothing personal against that particular guy) is that we don't have to hear from the women voters and cucks about "muh Kennedy Clan", "Camelot!", and "I'm in LUV!"

    As for the main topic, that 77 y/o man will just die soon anyway, but it's the deals like ex-Governor Cuomo's pardon that really do the damage. Hey maybe George Soros would like to learn to fly, or ski, or take Hillary out on a date down on the Vinyed.

    Replies: @Alden, @David In TN

    Accident prone is a euphemism for drunk or drugged. Best place to get drunk or do drugs is at home bear a couch or bed.

    Not at a party or bar where you’ll have to drive home. Not just before you get on a boat or fly your plane get on a surfboard or sky down the mountain.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Alden

    Best place to get drunk or do drugs is at home bear a couch or bed.

    We all acknowledge your deep knowledge base on this topic.

  77. @Harry Baldwin
    @dearieme

    I just listened to Joe Rogan's almost 3 hour interview with Tom O'Neill about his book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. If O'Neill's research doesn't persuade you that the CIA is capable of anything, nothing will.

    https://jrelibrary.com/1459-tom-oneill/

    What gets me is that Rogan will say, "Wow, they were up to some crazy shit back then." Back then?! What about the last five years?

    Replies: @DCThrowback, @JimDandy, @anon

    That interview was great and is required listening for anyone interested in the CIA, MK-Ultra and the 1960s and 1970s. O’Neill is so careful to say this is what I can prove and this is what my guess is; very clarifying. He can put Manson and West in SF at the same time and roughly the same place but can’t physically put them in the same room. Maybe someday.

    Some people need more evidence that intel services have developed capabilities that are beyond what we can rationally accept. Derren Brown provides some.

    • Replies: @Brutusale
    @DCThrowback


    O’Neill is so careful to say this is what I can prove and this is what my guess is; very clarifying.
     
    To me, that's what made the book believable. That and the fact that in gossipy Hollywood, nobody wanted to go on record, 25 years after the events.
  78. @Buffalo Joe
    Kennedys have no traction, when was the last time one was considered for a political office? Today's dems don't invoke JFK, too centrist, after all, asking ..." what can you do for your country" and not the reverse. Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, avowed radical communists and members of the terrorist Weather Underground, mentors of obama and surrogate parents to San Francisco DA, chesa boudin, dedicated their communist manifesto, "Prairie Fire" to Sirhan Sirhan. And these people still have clout. boudin's father, convicted of Second Degree murder for his role in a robbery to fund the Weather Underground, was just granted clemency by andrew cuomo. Interesting thread that runs through all these people.

    Replies: @Brutusale, @ScarletNumber

    Careful, Joe, don’t jinx us! We just got rid of one of the assholes 2 years ago.

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/01/joe-kennedy-iii-loses-to-incumbent-ed-markey-in-dem-primary/

    Kennedys are like cockroaches; step on one and three more pop up!

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    @Brutusale

    Brutus, where have you been? I think in some way andrew cuomo is a shirt tail Kennedy. No more kennedys, cuomos or bushes ! Stay safe.

    , @Art Deco
    @Brutusale

    I don't care for the Kennedys. In fairness to that particular Kennedy, he didn't have any notable scandals adhering to him. One of the oddities of the Kennedy family is that the worst among them seem to have the longest careers. Edward Kennedy's older son, by all appearances a satisfactory person, spent four years in the Connecticut legislature, then went home. Mark Shriver was in the Maryland legislature for a couple of terms, then stood down. Kathleen Townsend discovered she was dead inventory in Maryland. OTOH, Edward Kennedy's alcoholic younger son was in public office continuously in Rhode Island for 22 years.

  79. @Harry Baldwin
    @dearieme

    I just listened to Joe Rogan's almost 3 hour interview with Tom O'Neill about his book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. If O'Neill's research doesn't persuade you that the CIA is capable of anything, nothing will.

    https://jrelibrary.com/1459-tom-oneill/

    What gets me is that Rogan will say, "Wow, they were up to some crazy shit back then." Back then?! What about the last five years?

    Replies: @DCThrowback, @JimDandy, @anon

    Great book, which I was turned on to by an Unz article. Doesn’t this dead Kennedy’s son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @JimDandy


    Doesn’t this dead Kennedy’s son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?
     
    But he thinks Anthony Fauci killed your dad.


    The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health
    , @Paul Jolliffe
    @JimDandy

    Yes, RFK jr., in very carefully worded language, clearly does not accept the mainstream narrative of his father’s murder.

    Nor do I.

    Actually, nor does the coroner Thomas Noguchi, who performed the autopsy.

    The bullets which struck RFK were not from Sirhan’s gun: a second gunman, firing from behind at point blank range.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/26/who-killed-bobby-kennedy-his-son-rfk-jr-doesnt-believe-it-was-sirhan-sirhan/%3foutputType=amp

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  80. @DCThrowback
    @Harry Baldwin

    That interview was great and is required listening for anyone interested in the CIA, MK-Ultra and the 1960s and 1970s. O'Neill is so careful to say this is what I can prove and this is what my guess is; very clarifying. He can put Manson and West in SF at the same time and roughly the same place but can't physically put them in the same room. Maybe someday.

    Some people need more evidence that intel services have developed capabilities that are beyond what we can rationally accept. Derren Brown provides some.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkLZDY9ilg4

    Replies: @Brutusale

    O’Neill is so careful to say this is what I can prove and this is what my guess is; very clarifying.

    To me, that’s what made the book believable. That and the fact that in gossipy Hollywood, nobody wanted to go on record, 25 years after the events.

  81. anon[352] • Disclaimer says:
    @Harry Baldwin
    @dearieme

    I just listened to Joe Rogan's almost 3 hour interview with Tom O'Neill about his book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. If O'Neill's research doesn't persuade you that the CIA is capable of anything, nothing will.

    https://jrelibrary.com/1459-tom-oneill/

    What gets me is that Rogan will say, "Wow, they were up to some crazy shit back then." Back then?! What about the last five years?

    Replies: @DCThrowback, @JimDandy, @anon

    This is just Wikipedia, so accuracy is not at all guaranteed. Yet even here it can be seen what was done in the US and Canada as part of the MK-Ultra program. Donald Cameron was an evil man. His evil clearly lives on.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron

    On topic: was Sirhan Sirhan just an angry Arab, or was he one of the early MK-Ultra windup toys turned loose for a purpose?

    If he was crazy 50+ years ago, is he sane now? Or if he was sane and criminal 50+ years ago, is he still sane?

  82. @Jonathan Mason
    @Wilkey


    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they’re releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues – lots of criminals don’t age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) – then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.
     
    Have you really studied this issue in depth?

    https://www.caregiver.org/news/unintended-consequence-elderly-prisoners/

    Correctional facilities throughout California have neither the financial or medical resources to deal with the ever-expanding population of elderly prisoners.

    “Prisons were never designed to be geriatric facilities,” stated Jamie Fellner, author of the HRW report. ”Yet US corrections officials now operate old age homes behind bars.”

    In particular, California has experienced a startling increase in the number of inmates aged 55 or older. Between 1990 and 2009, the percentage of older prisoners increased by more than 500 percent.

    The inevitable consequence of these stark numbers is the soaring healthcare costs. On average, the cost of housing for an elderly prisoner in California is nine times higher compared to a young prisoner.

    California is now facing a crisis, not only of overcrowded prisons, but a graying population as well. Prisoners suffering from Alzheimer’s pose a unique challenge for correctional officers.

    The New York Times reports that inmates with dementia often go unnoticed in the overcrowded and understaffed prisons, and at times are responsible for violent disturbances in the facilities. Plagued by paranoia, confusion, and memory loss, some elderly inmates will attack staff and fellow prisoners; a few cannot even recall their crimes.

    And I’m totally sure that a government that can’t – well, won’t – prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn’t have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach.

     

    People are often supervised these days via having a communications device that broadcasts their location locked to their leg. In any case, such a high profile parolee would find it hard to evade supervision. Most likely he would be in some kind of Medicaid residential facility, where his whereabouts would be logged several times daily.

    Anyway, none of us have talked to the guy, let alone professionally evaluated him to know what he is now capable of, or incapable of, any more than we know whether Britney Spears needs court-ordered supervision or not.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Jack D

    Not sure what you’re point is? We’re going to be paying these healthcare costs whether they are in prison or not. If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid. I guess they should have thought about this when they stopped executing murderers.

    • Agree: Unladen Swallow
    • Replies: @Boy the way Glenn Miller played
    @Wilkey


    If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid
     
    Couldn't they build a Medicaid funded, minimum security prison hospice out in the middle of nowhere?
    , @TWS
    @Wilkey

    For once, Mason is right. It's far more expensive to keep the very sick or old in prison. But right now that's a smoke screen.

    We don't know if he's needing specialized care or not. And probation is a joke. They are not capable of preventing crime except by locking a guy up.

    The other point is that we don't release political assassins or we shouldn't. I don't mind keeping him in for another fifty years.

  83. @Ralph L

    the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. president, Huey Long in 1935,
     
    I believe you mean senator, not president.

    No question the MLK and RFK killings had hugely bad impacts on the US, and I don't care for either man. The man who shot at FDR early in '33 was executed before his inaugural or soon after. We shouldn't mess around with political murder. OTOH, the man who shot Scalise was quickly dead and his crime forgotten by most.

    Replies: @stillCARealist, @Verymuchalive, @Chris Mallory, @Hibernian

    If only Huey Long had been President. America wouldn’t be in the mess it is now.

  84. But I think people like Gascon do stupid stuff less because they are super smart than that they get stupid ideas in their head

    No, Steve. Some people are wreckers who just want to burn it all down. In a religious context you might say the Devil possessed him. Whether it’s that or just some other mental illness, who knows. But he’s a sick, twisted bastard who should be put out to sea on a plank. No sane society would suffer his presence.

  85. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    It’s appropriate that you add you little snide remark about groveling to the Jews to the above quote. The words are by Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse Five, but they are put in the mouth of Howard Campbell, an American Nazi ass-clown/traitor:

    In other words, you have taken at face value what Vonnegut meant as a ridiculous parody. Even in the 1940s, Americans were not “mainly poor”, even by first world standards (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn’t dream of owing an automobile, and wouldn’t have one (at least not one we would consider to be a “real” car) until decades into the American financed postwar prosperity era). And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.

    • Disagree: Jack Armstrong
    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Jack D


    And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.
     
    Yes, and fatter.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m6MHnxfuWI
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn’t dream of owing an automobile
     
    Stalin showed this film in the USSR to remind comrades that there were many poor in America. He had to pull it from the theaters rather quickly, as they had noticed this very phenomenon.
  86. I voted in the primary that Kennedy won. It was the first election I was old enough to vote. I voted for McCarthy. He wanted us out of Vietnam and so did I. The issues then were many of the same issues we are facing today.
    We do not need any more refugees from war-torn countries. We need to quit trying to save the world. Sirhan Sirhan is one of many who did not and will not enrich our country. Letting him go free will tick off a lot of people. Maybe that’s good to help prevent us “saving” thousands of Afghans.

  87. In other news, a feral negress attacks a white toddler in front of her mother in the Bronx.

    Stay tuned for the New York Times editorial, “She Had it Coming.”

  88. @Ralph L

    the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. president, Huey Long in 1935,
     
    I believe you mean senator, not president.

    No question the MLK and RFK killings had hugely bad impacts on the US, and I don't care for either man. The man who shot at FDR early in '33 was executed before his inaugural or soon after. We shouldn't mess around with political murder. OTOH, the man who shot Scalise was quickly dead and his crime forgotten by most.

    Replies: @stillCARealist, @Verymuchalive, @Chris Mallory, @Hibernian

    We shouldn’t mess around with political murder.

    If someone has to be murdered, better a politician than an innocent.

    • LOL: znon
    • Troll: Corvinus
  89. @Art Deco
    @Pat Hannagan

    By no international or historical standard are 'the people' in this country 'mainly poor'.

    Replies: @Chris Mallory

    The poor in the US should be judged by the standards of the US, not international standards. We are Americans, we are better than the rest of the world.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Chris Mallory

    The poor in the US should be judged by the standards of the US, not international standards. We are Americans, we are better than the rest of the world.

    Whatever standard you use, obesity is inversely correlated with income in this country, no more than 10% live in crime-ridden slums, 90% have medical insurance, and all but an odd minority live in households where you'll find an automobile and scads of consumer electronics.

  90. @Jonathan Mason
    @Wilkey


    Just as easy for a prison to take care of him as for Medicare or hospice. Unless they’re releasing all the elderly prisoners with health issues – lots of criminals don’t age well, I would guess (just look at OJ Simpson) – then dealing with inmates with health issues is something they do all the time.
     
    Have you really studied this issue in depth?

    https://www.caregiver.org/news/unintended-consequence-elderly-prisoners/

    Correctional facilities throughout California have neither the financial or medical resources to deal with the ever-expanding population of elderly prisoners.

    “Prisons were never designed to be geriatric facilities,” stated Jamie Fellner, author of the HRW report. ”Yet US corrections officials now operate old age homes behind bars.”

    In particular, California has experienced a startling increase in the number of inmates aged 55 or older. Between 1990 and 2009, the percentage of older prisoners increased by more than 500 percent.

    The inevitable consequence of these stark numbers is the soaring healthcare costs. On average, the cost of housing for an elderly prisoner in California is nine times higher compared to a young prisoner.

    California is now facing a crisis, not only of overcrowded prisons, but a graying population as well. Prisoners suffering from Alzheimer’s pose a unique challenge for correctional officers.

    The New York Times reports that inmates with dementia often go unnoticed in the overcrowded and understaffed prisons, and at times are responsible for violent disturbances in the facilities. Plagued by paranoia, confusion, and memory loss, some elderly inmates will attack staff and fellow prisoners; a few cannot even recall their crimes.

    And I’m totally sure that a government that can’t – well, won’t – prevent 200,000+ people from entering the country illegally each month will totally make sure Sirhan doesn’t have access to a firearm or visiting Palm Beach.

     

    People are often supervised these days via having a communications device that broadcasts their location locked to their leg. In any case, such a high profile parolee would find it hard to evade supervision. Most likely he would be in some kind of Medicaid residential facility, where his whereabouts would be logged several times daily.

    Anyway, none of us have talked to the guy, let alone professionally evaluated him to know what he is now capable of, or incapable of, any more than we know whether Britney Spears needs court-ordered supervision or not.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Jack D

    Sirhan’s brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.

    Democrats waste trillions of $ on all sorts of worthless shit, so pardon me if I think that their sudden concern for finances is not sincere. If it costs the treasury a few $ to keep some elderly prisoners in prison instead of in a government financed nursing home, this is a small price to pay for the deterrent effect of a life sentence. Ideally, we say to people, “if you take someone’s life, we will take yours” (California in fact has the death penalty on the books to this day, passed repeatedly by referendum, but the POS governor refuses to carry out the law). But, barring that, we say to people, “if you take someone’s life, we will never allow you to walk the streets again, even if you live to 120. Consider that before you pull the trigger.” Letting Sirhan and other elderly prisoners go muddles that message. It says once again (as if it hasn’t been demonstrated often enough) that the government cannot be trusted to keep its promises.

    This is all part of the Democrat frog boiling method. First they promise us, “if you get rid of the death penalty, we’ll impose life in prison without parole instead – it’s just as good.” Then if the sucker voters take the bait, the next step is “sorry, just kidding. We can’t actually afford to keep people in prison for their entire life so we have to let them go when they become elderly.” The next step is playing with the definition of “elderly” – first you set it to 75, then 70, then 65, etc. You boil the frog slowly.

    • Agree: Wilkey
    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

    The death penalty and the life in prison are more likely to encourage people to kill the witnesses who might testify against them.

    By the standards of almost all jurisdictions, Sirhan has served a life sentence and the question now is not so much one of punishment as whether he still represents a danger.

    In any case he can be paroled out of prison and then recalled if he does not behave himself.

    But I guess the Kennedy family ought to be allowed to offer their opinion.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Buffalo Joe

    , @clifford brown
    @Jack D


    Sirhan’s brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.
     
    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  91. If not even an uber liberal (beholden to the Kennedys) DA can keep Sirhan Sirhan in prison, what hope does the family of a victim killed by Dontavious or La’ Treen have?

    In Miami a White man from Colorado was shot dead by a black dude for no other reason than he was White. No reason. The DA is probably going to drop charges in exchange for the dude spending a few weeks in a mental institution.

    The police, cops, DAs, Judges, and Courts exist to punish YOU for being White, law abiding, middle class, and more. You are GUILTY! and will be punished. Meanwhile the vibrant person of color will increase vibrancy by cultural enrichment daily.

    Eventually White people will realize (as they mostly already are) that EVERY facet of Government, Corporations, the Law, Prosecutors, and more HATE THEM AND WANT THEM DEAD. For the crime of their skin color. Which they cannot change, and gives them hereditary guilt, blood guilt that can never be washed away. Anything and everything done to them is justice because they were guilty from before birth. If even the Kennedys can’t keep Sirhan Sirhan in prison, what hope does the ordinary person have? Nothing.

    Which means individual efforts along those lines are going to come into play. With, essentially nothing to lose.

  92. @Brutusale
    @Buffalo Joe

    Careful, Joe, don't jinx us! We just got rid of one of the assholes 2 years ago.

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/01/joe-kennedy-iii-loses-to-incumbent-ed-markey-in-dem-primary/

    Kennedys are like cockroaches; step on one and three more pop up!

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Art Deco

    Brutus, where have you been? I think in some way andrew cuomo is a shirt tail Kennedy. No more kennedys, cuomos or bushes ! Stay safe.

  93. you have taken at face value what Vonnegut meant as a ridiculous parody.

    Vonnegut parodies the rhetoric, a bit, but not the sentiment. Is Campbell delusional? To my mind Vonnegut (ex adman & car salesman) thinks of Campbell as the ultimate American— doing what it takes to “make it” in the world. The ultimate delusion if you will. (Watched the clip but it’s far from faithful to the novel.)

  94. Sirvan Dirham didn’t shoot Bob Kennedy. It was a set-up and Sigan was the patsy. One of his bodyguards did shoot him.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @BB753

    Oops! Auto-correct on overdrive! Make it "Sirham Sirham".

  95. @Art Deco
    He's been in prison for 53 years. He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun and guilty of political assassination. Whether he qualifies for parole or not should depend on whether or not he has served the mandatory minimum (he apparently has) and the degree to which he has been a disciplinary problem in prison.

    The real outrage is the commutation granted Chesa Boudin's father in New York. If New York had a sane schedule of penalties, participation in an armed robbery which resulted in the deaths of three people would bring down a capital sentence on all of the participants. Chesa's papa should have been put in front of a firing squad 30+ years ago.

    Remember Emily Harris of the Symbionese Liberation Army fame? She was a participant in one kidnapping for ransom (no clue about about California; that's an A-I felony in New York) and three armed robberies. She's likely guilty of harboring two men guilty of one premeditated murder and one attempted murder. Most importantly, she murdered a pregnant woman in the course of one of those armed robberies. This array of crimes should have sufficed to get her locked up for about 50 years if not executed. She actually served 12 years. For whatever reason, the felony murder rule was never applied to her and it took the Stupidstan of California 27 years to prosecute her for the murder of Myrna Opsahl; she was permitted to plead and paroled after four years. Our judiciary is a a scandal.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Alden, @Hibernian

    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun

    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer’s Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan’s disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    You can add assault charges to if you'd like. Not sure any of the others were seriously injured. Interestingly enough, Vincent Bugliosi, meticulous and industrious conspiracy skeptic, was in regard to the RFK assassination partial to the thesis that there was a 2d gunman they never apprehended.

    The problem with implementing capital punishment has been manufactured by the judiciary, but no one assaults them or takes their toys away from them in retaliation, so the beat goes on.

    , @anon
    @Jack D

    his is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer’s Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently).

    A so-called "Saturday Night Special", and surely this particular assassination was strong motivation for some parts of the Gun Control Act of 1968 that put many restrictions on imported pistols...the Kennedys being the true Holy Family for Dems in the 1960's.

    The small caliber allowed for the barrel cylinder of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    FIFY. No charge, this time. I'll just make up the difference on volume.

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan’s disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    No, it's not the only factor they're required to consider. In a sensible system of criminal justice, it's the only factor they do consider.

    Punishment formulae are properly specified in statutes. Factual determinations which function as arguments in the formulae are properly made by a judge and assessors in a sentencing hearing. The only discretion a judge should have is (1) in re warrants and summonses, (2) findings of probable cause, (3) ratification of plea agreements, and (4) rulings on questions of law.

    Parole has a practical function: to persuade convicts it is in their interest to obey the guards and not mix it up with each other or vandalize the premises. There are more aversive methods available, of course.

    Replies: @Abolish_public_education

    , @JimDandyAbroad
    @Jack D

    The cylinder.

  96. @Jack D
    @Art Deco


    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun
     
    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer's Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan's disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @anon, @Art Deco, @JimDandyAbroad

    You can add assault charges to if you’d like. Not sure any of the others were seriously injured. Interestingly enough, Vincent Bugliosi, meticulous and industrious conspiracy skeptic, was in regard to the RFK assassination partial to the thesis that there was a 2d gunman they never apprehended.

    The problem with implementing capital punishment has been manufactured by the judiciary, but no one assaults them or takes their toys away from them in retaliation, so the beat goes on.

  97. anon[394] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @Art Deco


    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun
     
    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer's Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan's disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @anon, @Art Deco, @JimDandyAbroad

    his is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer’s Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently).

    A so-called “Saturday Night Special”, and surely this particular assassination was strong motivation for some parts of the Gun Control Act of 1968 that put many restrictions on imported pistols…the Kennedys being the true Holy Family for Dems in the 1960’s.

    The small caliber allowed for the barrel cylinder of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    FIFY. No charge, this time. I’ll just make up the difference on volume.

  98. @Jack D
    @Pat Hannagan

    It's appropriate that you add you little snide remark about groveling to the Jews to the above quote. The words are by Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse Five, but they are put in the mouth of Howard Campbell, an American Nazi ass-clown/traitor:

    https://youtu.be/OixVPcCbcx0

    In other words, you have taken at face value what Vonnegut meant as a ridiculous parody. Even in the 1940s, Americans were not "mainly poor", even by first world standards (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn't dream of owing an automobile, and wouldn't have one (at least not one we would consider to be a "real" car) until decades into the American financed postwar prosperity era). And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar

    And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.

    Yes, and fatter.

  99. @Jack D
    @Art Deco


    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun
     
    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer's Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan's disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @anon, @Art Deco, @JimDandyAbroad

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan’s disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    No, it’s not the only factor they’re required to consider. In a sensible system of criminal justice, it’s the only factor they do consider.

    Punishment formulae are properly specified in statutes. Factual determinations which function as arguments in the formulae are properly made by a judge and assessors in a sentencing hearing. The only discretion a judge should have is (1) in re warrants and summonses, (2) findings of probable cause, (3) ratification of plea agreements, and (4) rulings on questions of law.

    Parole has a practical function: to persuade convicts it is in their interest to obey the guards and not mix it up with each other or vandalize the premises. There are more aversive methods available, of course.

    • Replies: @Abolish_public_education
    @Art Deco

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    I am so sick and tired of:

    • judges who act like lawmakers.
    • lawmakers who act like judges.
    • judges/lawmakers who disavow their own, proper roles.
    • i’net commenters who cheer them on.

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    They also act like lawmakers, in that they dictatorially craft school regulations; judges are reluctant to toss (there’s that disavowal, again).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @kaganovitch

  100. @Brutusale
    @Buffalo Joe

    Careful, Joe, don't jinx us! We just got rid of one of the assholes 2 years ago.

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/01/joe-kennedy-iii-loses-to-incumbent-ed-markey-in-dem-primary/

    Kennedys are like cockroaches; step on one and three more pop up!

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Art Deco

    I don’t care for the Kennedys. In fairness to that particular Kennedy, he didn’t have any notable scandals adhering to him. One of the oddities of the Kennedy family is that the worst among them seem to have the longest careers. Edward Kennedy’s older son, by all appearances a satisfactory person, spent four years in the Connecticut legislature, then went home. Mark Shriver was in the Maryland legislature for a couple of terms, then stood down. Kathleen Townsend discovered she was dead inventory in Maryland. OTOH, Edward Kennedy’s alcoholic younger son was in public office continuously in Rhode Island for 22 years.

  101. Sirhan has served enough time. I would have paroled. him 20 years ago.

    I would parole that Manson girl too, the cute one.

    • Replies: @donut
    @Daniel H

    While I agree that degree of cuteness should be considered by parole boards past cuteness is irrelevant .

  102. … (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction).

    The key is “leftwing.” The MLK murder didn’t get traction because the suspect was a White boy who was neither a communist nor a brown terrorist.

    Steve correctly implies here that the real reason for the conspiracy-hypothesizing-efforts at exoneration is because the obvious villains are favorite children of the left.

    But I always found RFK conspiracy theorizing boring compared to JFK, the gold standard of conspiracy theories.

    Case in point: Oswald is obviously guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but he too was a communist and a midwit with a shallow understanding of Marxism. Thus he must be defended at all costs.

    The truth is, JFK was murdered by what Jackie Kennedy called “a silly little communist.”

    If Jack Rubenstein hadn’t offed him, Oswald himself might also be up for parole and supported by Soros’s demons now.

    BTW, Steve, thank you for promoting Occam’s Razor in your blog. It is one of the best tools for cutting through crap like this.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Gamecock
    @Buzz Mohawk


    If Jack Rubenstein hadn’t offed him, Oswald himself might also be up for parole and supported by Soros’s demons now.
     
    Ruby was an associate of Santo Trafficante, Jr.
  103. A good starting place is The Second Gun on YouTube. And the labor leader just didn’t change his mind. He changed it years and years ago. And the famous coroner Thomas Nghochi didn’t go along with the official story and suffered reprisals. If you don’t accept that a Manchurian Candidate is possible, you haven’t read about the research they were doing on the subject. The major 60’s assassinations eliminated MLK, Malcolm, JFK, and RFK and changed the direction of American politics and a movement for peace.

  104. Steve,

    Tex Watson (age 75) comes up for parole (again) in October this year. Watson was Manson’s main killer in the Tate-Labianca murders. I’ve thought Gascon will make a big show of opposing Watson’s release.

  105. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan’s disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    No, it's not the only factor they're required to consider. In a sensible system of criminal justice, it's the only factor they do consider.

    Punishment formulae are properly specified in statutes. Factual determinations which function as arguments in the formulae are properly made by a judge and assessors in a sentencing hearing. The only discretion a judge should have is (1) in re warrants and summonses, (2) findings of probable cause, (3) ratification of plea agreements, and (4) rulings on questions of law.

    Parole has a practical function: to persuade convicts it is in their interest to obey the guards and not mix it up with each other or vandalize the premises. There are more aversive methods available, of course.

    Replies: @Abolish_public_education

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    I am so sick and tired of:

    • judges who act like lawmakers.
    • lawmakers who act like judges.
    • judges/lawmakers who disavow their own, proper roles.
    • i’net commenters who cheer them on.

    [MORE]

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    They also act like lawmakers, in that they dictatorially craft school regulations; judges are reluctant to toss (there’s that disavowal, again).

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Abolish_public_education

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    It isn't. Nor should it be.

    Replies: @Jack Armstrong

    , @kaganovitch
    @Abolish_public_education

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    You really stay on message. Perhaps you could give TED talks or the like to GOP pols and teach them how it's done?

  106. @Achmed E. Newman
    There are lots of conspiracies associated with a number of those problem-child Kennedies. There's got to be ONE of them that is right for JFK, as there are so many reasons certain people - Deep State, anybody? - WOULD have been out to get him, the odds are just not likely that none of them are the case. I wish his assassination hadn't resulted in the rise of the Socialist Scumbag LBJ, but all of these guys were missing a Conservative "gene" so to speak.

    For the rest of the "Clan", well, the men are just a bunch of accident-prone screw ups. Skiing into trees, not knowing how to fly instruments in straight-and-level flight when you've been taught for 10 or more hours, driving drunk off bridges (and leaving her to SUFFOCATE)., etc. It's not an accident when a whole family is accident-prone. They were just not prudent people, hence not Conservatives at heart.

    The best thing since JFK Jr, kicked it (and nothing personal against that particular guy) is that we don't have to hear from the women voters and cucks about "muh Kennedy Clan", "Camelot!", and "I'm in LUV!"

    As for the main topic, that 77 y/o man will just die soon anyway, but it's the deals like ex-Governor Cuomo's pardon that really do the damage. Hey maybe George Soros would like to learn to fly, or ski, or take Hillary out on a date down on the Vinyed.

    Replies: @Alden, @David In TN

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @David In TN

    But didn't the "sex scandal" plot emerge later when media became so pliant that they started to take up the salacious idiocies w/o questioning or analysis?

    "RAPE IN SWEDEN"

    Ok, so Assange had a Smörebröt with some gal who regretted her itch a day later...

    , @Alden
    @David In TN

    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant

    The real scandal was his Addison’s brain disease dangerously advanced osteoporosis and prescription drug regime.

    Kennedy’ death was a disaster for Whites. Johnson and Humphrey rammed through civil rights for all but Whites, unlimited non White immigration and worst of all the No Whites Need Apply affirmative action act in just 4 years.

    If anyone other than Oswald did it; it was probably the civil rights for all but Whites Ellis Island descendants. If you know what I mean.

    Kennedy worship is a sign of old age. More so than white hair and wrinkles

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Colin Wright

    , @dearieme
    @David In TN

    If their only target had been JFK that's a telling point. But if their purpose had been to scare every leading American politician wouldn't assassination be best?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Ragno

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @David In TN

    Good point - a sex scandal would have worked back then. One did even up through the time of Gary Hart 25 years later. However, David, that could have kept him from a 2nd term, but would it have gotten him impeached and out of office? That's not a sure thing.

    I have not read the number of books about it that Mr. Unz has, or lots of others. I'll just say that John Kennedy's ideas about getting the country back on sound money could have been what got the Deep State's panties in a big wad.

  107. OT: Steve, have you listened to the Nipsy Hustle 30 for 30 podcast yet? It’s only four parts and 155 minutes, so obviously barely scratches the surface of the life of this cultural colossus.

    “This series examines how that overlap of Black male creativity, talent and ambition will forever live on in Nipsey’s responsibility to his neighborhood and how NBA players are vowing to continue his marathon moving forward.”

    Forever!

    • LOL: Johann Ricke
  108. @Desiderius
    https://twitter.com/TheAgeofShoddy/status/1430652713289854978?s=20

    Replies: @David In TN, @El Dato

    So Biden (and Harris) are French’s examples of “character and competence.”

  109. @Jack D
    @Jonathan Mason

    Sirhan's brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.

    Democrats waste trillions of $ on all sorts of worthless shit, so pardon me if I think that their sudden concern for finances is not sincere. If it costs the treasury a few $ to keep some elderly prisoners in prison instead of in a government financed nursing home, this is a small price to pay for the deterrent effect of a life sentence. Ideally, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will take yours" (California in fact has the death penalty on the books to this day, passed repeatedly by referendum, but the POS governor refuses to carry out the law). But, barring that, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will never allow you to walk the streets again, even if you live to 120. Consider that before you pull the trigger." Letting Sirhan and other elderly prisoners go muddles that message. It says once again (as if it hasn't been demonstrated often enough) that the government cannot be trusted to keep its promises.

    This is all part of the Democrat frog boiling method. First they promise us, "if you get rid of the death penalty, we'll impose life in prison without parole instead - it's just as good." Then if the sucker voters take the bait, the next step is "sorry, just kidding. We can't actually afford to keep people in prison for their entire life so we have to let them go when they become elderly." The next step is playing with the definition of "elderly" - first you set it to 75, then 70, then 65, etc. You boil the frog slowly.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @clifford brown

    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

    The death penalty and the life in prison are more likely to encourage people to kill the witnesses who might testify against them.

    By the standards of almost all jurisdictions, Sirhan has served a life sentence and the question now is not so much one of punishment as whether he still represents a danger.

    In any case he can be paroled out of prison and then recalled if he does not behave himself.

    But I guess the Kennedy family ought to be allowed to offer their opinion.

    • Disagree: Gamecock
    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason


    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.
     
    Actually the United States averaged less than 30 executions per year from 1975-2002. That was during a period when murder rates were sky high. We were executing perhaps only 1 in 500 murderers.

    Last year, in 2020, only 17 people were executed in the US - or about 0.1% of all the murders committed annually.

    We had 780 executions total from 175-2002, and only 916 from 1950-1974. The latter was a 75% drop from the previous quarter-century (1925-1949), when 3,644 were executed, and an even larger drop relative to the number of murders being committed. So over the laqst 70 or so years we've gone from executing maybe one murderer in 50 to only one murderer in 1,000 - and our murder rates have gone up, unsurprisingly.

    It's hard to make the death penalty a deterrent when so few murderers are ever actually executed, and even then after only decades of appeals.

    And of course the other reason the US has such a high murder rate relative to First World countries is that reason which must not be named. Parts of the country with large numbers of blacks have murder rates similar to black countries. But many mostly white jurrisdictions have murder rates lower than European countries.

    Deterrence is only part of the reason for executing killers. Vengeance is another perfectly valid reason. Not incacrerating aged inmates, as you've pointed out, is another. Another, as we're seeing now, is is that leftists can't be trusted for shit. They promise to replace the death penalty with "life without parole" and then once the death penalty is gone they abolish life without parole.

    And finally another is that once you lower the ultimate penalty for the worst crimes, it only follows that the penalty for lesser crimes will have to be reduced, as well.

    , @Buffalo Joe
    @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan, I was surprised to learn that a sentence of 'Life in Prison without the Possibility of Parole' does not mean you are never going to be free. You just can't be paroled out. However, these sentences can be commuted to time served. California governor Jerry Brown commuted the sentences of at least 6 murderers before he left office.

    Replies: @mikeInThe716

  110. Long story short, Robert Kennedy was killed by a bullet to the brain– never identified as having come from Sirhan’s gun– that wounded the senator from virtually point-blank range– one to three inches, according to Dr. Thomas Naguchi, who did the autopsy– from behind his right ear, and which entered at a markedly upward trajectory. Sirhan was never standing closer to Kennedy than about five feet, and even with his gun arm outstretched, could not have shot Kennedy at such close range, nor from his right rear, nor at the requisite angle. There was a gunman in that required location– in fact, he had hold of Kennedy’s right arm with his own left hand, and the two fell to the floor of the kitchen pantry together– but that gunman’s name was not Sirhan Sirhan. Sirhan had been tackled back onto a pantry tabletop, by Kennedy’s celebrity bodyguards, after only his second shot, and his other six shots went off wildly into the room– including into the ceiling and the doorframe, at the back of the room (from Sirhan’s perspective).

    For Steve, it is imperative that Sirhan Sirhan, acting alone, assassinated Senator Robert Kennedy, thus becoming, in Steve’s eyes, the first Palestinian terrorist on American soil– just as it is imperative for Steve that Lee Oswald, an avowed Communist, was the “lone nut” who had assassinated President John Kennedy, with a fatal bullet to the brain, after wounding both Kennedy and Governor Connally with a “magic bullet” that was (allegedly) found on the floor of Parkland Hospital, after falling off of a hallway stretcher that was bumped into by another stretcher that was being parked there, despite that bullet’s being barely deformed and having lost less mass than the fragments recovered from Connally’s multiple wounds. As my own congressman, Earl Landgrebe, famously said, in the summer of 1974: “Don’t confuse me with the facts. I’ve got a closed mind.”

    As for the enduring myth that Senator Robert Kennedy, due to his win in the California Democratic Presidential Primary, was then a virtual shoo-in for the Democratic nomination, and would have been favored to become the next President of the United States, with a win over Richard Nixon, Kennedy’s own campaign manager publicly admitted that Kennedy’s only hope for winning the nomination, at that summer’s convention, was to get many of Hubert Humphrey’s pledged delegates to betray him and vote for Kennedy, instead.

  111. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    Alice B. Popinjay?

  112. @Desiderius
    https://twitter.com/TheAgeofShoddy/status/1430652713289854978?s=20

    Replies: @David In TN, @El Dato

    David French’s deep thoughts a like the deep grooves of my bike tires: they collect random stuff that’s not easy to look at.

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand? The basic configuration of “Who says what to whom apropos what and why” is sometimes entirely unscrutable. It’s like an existentialist theatre piece written by Sartre in not his best moments.

    • Replies: @anon
    @El Dato

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand?

    Is it hard to understand what is shouted back and forth across the high school lunchroom table?

    Same idea.

    These Twatter samples are usually boring.

    , @Desiderius
    @El Dato

    What's inscrutable about them?

    People need effective rejoinders to the French Davidians running the country into the ground. I linked to a good one. Who it is matters less than what is thought and said.

    , @J.Ross
    @El Dato

    Agree, I hate how Twitter deliberately puts it out of order. There is no reason why it shouldn't have the same order as normal prose.

  113. @David In TN
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Alden, @dearieme, @Achmed E. Newman

    But didn’t the “sex scandal” plot emerge later when media became so pliant that they started to take up the salacious idiocies w/o questioning or analysis?

    “RAPE IN SWEDEN”

    Ok, so Assange had a Smörebröt with some gal who regretted her itch a day later…

  114. When the shooting started RFK was spun around and came close to Sirhan’s gun…hence the shot to the back of the head. No second shooter.

  115. @Desiderius
    https://twitter.com/the_brumby/status/1430219683320504321?s=20

    That's not all they're in control of. Not easy to find something they're not.

    Replies: @El Dato

    Ausfailia and New Madland are two particularly egregious examples. Who would have though that “ZERO COVID” is actually a hare-brained scheme that is a bad fit to anything this universe tells yout? Certainly not the “managerial elites”. Fantasy is their domain.

    Fury over Covid rules is FINALLY helping Aussies lose their long-held, unhealthy respect for authority

    Then there are the stern warnings from state leaders that would be hilarious if they weren’t so serious – about enjoying sunset on the beach, removing a mask to drink beer, dodging errant footballs while watching a game, and most recently, a local council deciding to shoot 15 rescue dogs rather than allow volunteers from an animal shelter to travel for their collection in case they spread the virus.

    That’s the level of insanity we’re looking at.

  116. @Art Deco
    He's been in prison for 53 years. He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun and guilty of political assassination. Whether he qualifies for parole or not should depend on whether or not he has served the mandatory minimum (he apparently has) and the degree to which he has been a disciplinary problem in prison.

    The real outrage is the commutation granted Chesa Boudin's father in New York. If New York had a sane schedule of penalties, participation in an armed robbery which resulted in the deaths of three people would bring down a capital sentence on all of the participants. Chesa's papa should have been put in front of a firing squad 30+ years ago.

    Remember Emily Harris of the Symbionese Liberation Army fame? She was a participant in one kidnapping for ransom (no clue about about California; that's an A-I felony in New York) and three armed robberies. She's likely guilty of harboring two men guilty of one premeditated murder and one attempted murder. Most importantly, she murdered a pregnant woman in the course of one of those armed robberies. This array of crimes should have sufficed to get her locked up for about 50 years if not executed. She actually served 12 years. For whatever reason, the felony murder rule was never applied to her and it took the Stupidstan of California 27 years to prosecute her for the murder of Myrna Opsahl; she was permitted to plead and paroled after four years. Our judiciary is a a scandal.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Alden, @Hibernian

    As soon as Emily Harris got out of prison her defense attorney hired her to work as a paralegal. Her fellow murderer and terrorist husband / boyfriend too.

  117. Relying on the Taliban for protection is like relying on Steve for comment moderation.
    https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1430974351747190789
    semi-related: anti-Trump moron McMasters openly saying he hopes that the alCIAda bombings mean we never leave. Saying the quiet part out loud, McMasters. 13 Marines are dead after a 100% preventable total failure of security. Who’s resigning? Oh, right, nobody.

  118. At least an order of magnitude more loathsome is Cuomo’s pardon of David Gilbert–the minoritarian terrorist murderer.

    Democrats often reveal their loathsome character by the folks they pardon on the way out.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @AnotherDad

    "Democrats often reveal their loathsome character by the folks they pardon on the way out."

    You mean unscrupulous politicians regardless of party.

    https://www.nytimes.com/article/who-did-trump-pardon.html

  119. @David In TN
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Alden, @dearieme, @Achmed E. Newman

    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant

    The real scandal was his Addison’s brain disease dangerously advanced osteoporosis and prescription drug regime.

    Kennedy’ death was a disaster for Whites. Johnson and Humphrey rammed through civil rights for all but Whites, unlimited non White immigration and worst of all the No Whites Need Apply affirmative action act in just 4 years.

    If anyone other than Oswald did it; it was probably the civil rights for all but Whites Ellis Island descendants. If you know what I mean.

    Kennedy worship is a sign of old age. More so than white hair and wrinkles

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @Alden


    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant.
     
    I recently had a conversation with a 39-year-old woman who told me that she was maybe thinking about maybe having children. But it would probably mean she'd have to change careers.

    As a general rule I don't think 15 y.o. girls getting pregnant is a great idea. When I consider how far towards crazy we've gone in the opposite direction, however, I don't think it's the worst thing that can happen, by any means. I've had several friends who were either born to ~16 y.o. mothers or had children of their own at roughly that age. They and their children are all doing well.

    I know for a fact I would rather have my own daughters become teenage mothers than hit 40 childless, talking as if their dogs are their children, and still pretending like it might happen for them.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753

    , @Colin Wright
    @Alden

    'One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant...'

    I wouldn't call it perfectly acceptable. How heinous a crime it is has a lot to do with how it happened and what happens afterwards. Jerry Lee Lewis and Jeffrey Epstein at least belong in different circles of hell.

  120. The autopsy found powder burns around the wound in RFK’s head which supposedly means the shot was fired from close range and behind him while Sirhan Sirhan was in front and farther away. The defense didn’t bring this up during the trial. Did they have a reason for disbelieving it or what? I’ve never seen a good explanation for the powder burns.

  121. @Jack D
    @Jonathan Mason

    Sirhan's brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.

    Democrats waste trillions of $ on all sorts of worthless shit, so pardon me if I think that their sudden concern for finances is not sincere. If it costs the treasury a few $ to keep some elderly prisoners in prison instead of in a government financed nursing home, this is a small price to pay for the deterrent effect of a life sentence. Ideally, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will take yours" (California in fact has the death penalty on the books to this day, passed repeatedly by referendum, but the POS governor refuses to carry out the law). But, barring that, we say to people, "if you take someone's life, we will never allow you to walk the streets again, even if you live to 120. Consider that before you pull the trigger." Letting Sirhan and other elderly prisoners go muddles that message. It says once again (as if it hasn't been demonstrated often enough) that the government cannot be trusted to keep its promises.

    This is all part of the Democrat frog boiling method. First they promise us, "if you get rid of the death penalty, we'll impose life in prison without parole instead - it's just as good." Then if the sucker voters take the bait, the next step is "sorry, just kidding. We can't actually afford to keep people in prison for their entire life so we have to let them go when they become elderly." The next step is playing with the definition of "elderly" - first you set it to 75, then 70, then 65, etc. You boil the frog slowly.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @clifford brown

    Sirhan’s brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.

    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @clifford brown


    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

     

    How "Christian" is murdering a father of eleven?

    Replies: @Alden, @clifford brown

  122. But I always found RFK conspiracy theorizing boring compared to JFK, the gold standard of conspiracy theories.

    JFK got an airport that had destroyed a major urban wetland. RFK got a stadium that hosted the “Redskins” for half a century. It’s time to cancel both of them!

    (Fun fact: Canada named a mountain in the Yukon after JFK, and RFK was on the team that first scaled it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kennedy )

    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart… even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    György Schwartz has 12 years on Uncle Joe. How sharp is his mind today?

    (Fun bet: where will Joe celebrate his 80th birthday?)

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Reg Cæsar

    (Fun fact: Canada named a mountain in the Yukon after JFK, and RFK was on the team that first scaled it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kennedy )

    Thanks.

    The Canadians picked out the tallest unnamed mountain in Canada that was also the tallest unclimbed peak in North America.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  123. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

    The death penalty and the life in prison are more likely to encourage people to kill the witnesses who might testify against them.

    By the standards of almost all jurisdictions, Sirhan has served a life sentence and the question now is not so much one of punishment as whether he still represents a danger.

    In any case he can be paroled out of prison and then recalled if he does not behave himself.

    But I guess the Kennedy family ought to be allowed to offer their opinion.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Buffalo Joe

    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

    Actually the United States averaged less than 30 executions per year from 1975-2002. That was during a period when murder rates were sky high. We were executing perhaps only 1 in 500 murderers.

    Last year, in 2020, only 17 people were executed in the US – or about 0.1% of all the murders committed annually.

    We had 780 executions total from 175-2002, and only 916 from 1950-1974. The latter was a 75% drop from the previous quarter-century (1925-1949), when 3,644 were executed, and an even larger drop relative to the number of murders being committed. So over the laqst 70 or so years we’ve gone from executing maybe one murderer in 50 to only one murderer in 1,000 – and our murder rates have gone up, unsurprisingly.

    It’s hard to make the death penalty a deterrent when so few murderers are ever actually executed, and even then after only decades of appeals.

    And of course the other reason the US has such a high murder rate relative to First World countries is that reason which must not be named. Parts of the country with large numbers of blacks have murder rates similar to black countries. But many mostly white jurrisdictions have murder rates lower than European countries.

    Deterrence is only part of the reason for executing killers. Vengeance is another perfectly valid reason. Not incacrerating aged inmates, as you’ve pointed out, is another. Another, as we’re seeing now, is is that leftists can’t be trusted for shit. They promise to replace the death penalty with “life without parole” and then once the death penalty is gone they abolish life without parole.

    And finally another is that once you lower the ultimate penalty for the worst crimes, it only follows that the penalty for lesser crimes will have to be reduced, as well.

    • Agree: Jack D
    • Thanks: Coemgen, Johann Ricke
  124. @David In TN
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Alden, @dearieme, @Achmed E. Newman

    If their only target had been JFK that’s a telling point. But if their purpose had been to scare every leading American politician wouldn’t assassination be best?

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @dearieme

    Another unserious reply.

    , @Ragno
    @dearieme

    There are a few people around who think Trump literally dodged a bullet getting jobbed last November - that, Kushner or no Kushner, he would not have survived a second term.

  125. @Jack D
    @Pat Hannagan

    It's appropriate that you add you little snide remark about groveling to the Jews to the above quote. The words are by Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse Five, but they are put in the mouth of Howard Campbell, an American Nazi ass-clown/traitor:

    https://youtu.be/OixVPcCbcx0

    In other words, you have taken at face value what Vonnegut meant as a ridiculous parody. Even in the 1940s, Americans were not "mainly poor", even by first world standards (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn't dream of owing an automobile, and wouldn't have one (at least not one we would consider to be a "real" car) until decades into the American financed postwar prosperity era). And in the 75 years since the setting of that quote, Americans have become vastly richer.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar

    (in the Grapes of Wrath the Joads drive an automobile, albeit a broken down jalopy. The average British or German working man of that time (even men with regular factory jobs let alone the homeless) had a bicycle and couldn’t dream of owing an automobile

    Stalin showed this film in the USSR to remind comrades that there were many poor in America. He had to pull it from the theaters rather quickly, as they had noticed this very phenomenon.

  126. The Sacramento DA’s Office screwed up the Myrna Opsahl murder from the start. Despite Patty Hearst telling them Steven Soliah wasn’t in the bank when the murder took place, they insisted on trying him for shooting Opsahl. Of course Soliah was acquitted. They were afraid of trying the Opsahl murder for the next quarter century.

    When Kathy Solian AKA Sara Jane Olson was caught, the LA County DA’s office indicted her for setting bombs on police cars. During the investigation, they found more than enough evidence to try Olson, Emily Harris, etc for the Myrna Opsahl murder.

    The two LA prosecutors on the case went to the Sacramento DA and made a power point presentation on how to prove the Opsahl murder. The Sacramento prosecutors still wouldn’t go for it.

    In 2001, Olson pleaded guilty to the LA bombings for 5-6 years. Only then would Sacramento indict the SLA bunch for the Myrna Opsahl murder. A few months later they pleaded guilty to a few years in prison.

    One of the LA prosecutors, Michael Latin, said of the plead deal on an ID Channel show on the case, “It was absurd, about what you would get for having a rock of cocaine.”

  127. @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason

    Not sure what you’re point is? We’re going to be paying these healthcare costs whether they are in prison or not. If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid. I guess they should have thought about this when they stopped executing murderers.

    Replies: @Boy the way Glenn Miller played, @TWS

    If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid

    Couldn’t they build a Medicaid funded, minimum security prison hospice out in the middle of nowhere?

    • Agree: Wilkey
  128. @clifford brown
    @Jack D


    Sirhan’s brother is apparently planning to take him in. Maybe they are planning to do jihad together, maybe not.
     
    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

    How “Christian” is murdering a father of eleven?

    • Troll: ScarletNumber
    • Replies: @Alden
    @Reg Cæsar

    Sirhan is a Christian baptized and raised in the Greek Orthodox version of Christianity It was the Greek Orthodox Church that brought the Sirhan family to America as religious prosecution refugees and gave the mother a job working for a Greek Orthodox Church and found a house for them in Pasadena. Ca

    , @clifford brown
    @Reg Cæsar

    The point is that Sirhan Sirhan was not a "jihadist", but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Steve Sailer, @TWS

  129. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    Steve’s being nicer to Soros than he deserves.

  130. @David In TN
    @Achmed E. Newman

    As I told Ron Unz in another thread, if some Deep State types wanted to get rid of JFK, they would have done it with a sex scandal. It would have made Kennedy a world laughing stock rather than a martyr by assassination.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Alden, @dearieme, @Achmed E. Newman

    Good point – a sex scandal would have worked back then. One did even up through the time of Gary Hart 25 years later. However, David, that could have kept him from a 2nd term, but would it have gotten him impeached and out of office? That’s not a sure thing.

    I have not read the number of books about it that Mr. Unz has, or lots of others. I’ll just say that John Kennedy’s ideas about getting the country back on sound money could have been what got the Deep State’s panties in a big wad.

  131. @Jack D
    @Art Deco


    He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun
     
    Actually Sirhan shot six people that night but only one (Kennedy) died. This is perhaps more on account of his puny weapon (a .22 revolver) than the application of Sailer's Law (Arabs count as white or did at least until recently). The small caliber allowed for the barrel of his revolver to contain 8 rounds.

    The last 15 times Sirhan came up for parole, the parole board did not think he was a suitable candidate. If they suddenly change their minds now, I am guessing it has more to do with Current Year California Democrat politics than with any change in Sirhan's disciplinary record (which BTW has always been clean and which BTW is not the only factor that they board is required to consider).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @anon, @Art Deco, @JimDandyAbroad

    The cylinder.

  132. @Pat Hannagan
    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    Classic self-unaware Steve Sailer

    “America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, 'It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.' It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: 'if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?' There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register."

    For Steve, every day is a new chance to grovel at the foot of a Jew. After all, Jews are rich, they must be high IQ.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYprgy5MPs

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Dumbo, @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @Anonymous

    So … I guess you aren’t rich?

  133. @Reg Cæsar
    @clifford brown


    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

     

    How "Christian" is murdering a father of eleven?

    Replies: @Alden, @clifford brown

    Sirhan is a Christian baptized and raised in the Greek Orthodox version of Christianity It was the Greek Orthodox Church that brought the Sirhan family to America as religious prosecution refugees and gave the mother a job working for a Greek Orthodox Church and found a house for them in Pasadena. Ca

  134. George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

    There’s nothing more dangerous than a rich, smart man “giving back.”

  135. @Dumbo
    @Pat Hannagan


    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.
     
    At this point, I don't know anymore if it's disingenuity or cluelessness by Steve.

    "Ruin his reputation in old age"??
    When in Hell Soros had a "reputation" to ruin?
    In his youth when he was helping confiscate property from his fellow Jews?
    Or in 1992 when the shorted the British pound?

    And Steve does the same thing dismissing the "not so great reset" as just a silly idea by billionaires that for some reason are acting like bumbling morons who don't know what they were doing.

    Probably, Steve sucks up to rich and famous and smart, high-status people, because he wishes he was as rich and famous and smart and high-status as them; and so he tries to protect their "reputation".

    But to paint them as dumb morons who somehow don't know what they are doing, or that they are engaging in evil stuff "by accident" or "by mistake", is just embarrassing.

    Replies: @BB753, @Pat Hannagan

    Steve is unable to contemplate that some people are plain evil. And that our elite is truly evil and has always been so. Some prefer the term “predator class” to elite.

  136. @BB753
    Sirvan Dirham didn't shoot Bob Kennedy. It was a set-up and Sigan was the patsy. One of his bodyguards did shoot him.

    Replies: @BB753

    Oops! Auto-correct on overdrive! Make it “Sirham Sirham”.

  137. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    The existence of the death penalty or the promise of life in prison does little to encourage potential murderers to stop and think. If it did the United States would have one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

    The death penalty and the life in prison are more likely to encourage people to kill the witnesses who might testify against them.

    By the standards of almost all jurisdictions, Sirhan has served a life sentence and the question now is not so much one of punishment as whether he still represents a danger.

    In any case he can be paroled out of prison and then recalled if he does not behave himself.

    But I guess the Kennedy family ought to be allowed to offer their opinion.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Buffalo Joe

    Jonathan, I was surprised to learn that a sentence of ‘Life in Prison without the Possibility of Parole’ does not mean you are never going to be free. You just can’t be paroled out. However, these sentences can be commuted to time served. California governor Jerry Brown commuted the sentences of at least 6 murderers before he left office.

    • Replies: @mikeInThe716
    @Buffalo Joe

    So Sirhan, the murderer of a senator, sentenced originally to death, then life imprisonment, can get paroled now for being, I guess, elderly???

    Mark David Chapman was sentenced to "20 to life" in 1981. He is 66. Since 2002, he gets a parole hearing every other year. Any chance a woke Manhattan DA will be neutral on a future hearing?

    Probably not - but, if Chapman had murdered a nobody New Yorker, he'd be out. So, will some SJW prosecutor play that angle to annoy boomer moderates? Is THAT any more nuts that the Sirhan parole logic?

  138. @J.Ross
    @Paleo Liberal

    Problem: why would a wet team check in under their proper names? Did they also register their gun serial numbers?
    The strongest negative case is that the guy who is supposed to have done it should not have been able to -- he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I'm not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Art Deco

    You make an excellent point.

    People often believe what they want to believe.

    Here is an alternate explanation:

    J. Edgar Hoover was not a fan of MLK, and kept him under constant surveillance. By coincidence, some agents sent to watch after MLK on that particular event had previously been assigned to Dallas for JFK’s visit.

    Coincidence sometimes happens. Sometimes news reports surface of people who, Forest Gump style, somehow wind up at infamous events more than once.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Paleo Liberal

    Alternative hypothesis: it's an urban legend. Who would be storing 30 year old hotel registers and why?

  139. @dearieme
    @David In TN

    If their only target had been JFK that's a telling point. But if their purpose had been to scare every leading American politician wouldn't assassination be best?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Ragno

    Another unserious reply.

  140. @Alden
    @David In TN

    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant

    The real scandal was his Addison’s brain disease dangerously advanced osteoporosis and prescription drug regime.

    Kennedy’ death was a disaster for Whites. Johnson and Humphrey rammed through civil rights for all but Whites, unlimited non White immigration and worst of all the No Whites Need Apply affirmative action act in just 4 years.

    If anyone other than Oswald did it; it was probably the civil rights for all but Whites Ellis Island descendants. If you know what I mean.

    Kennedy worship is a sign of old age. More so than white hair and wrinkles

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Colin Wright

    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant.

    I recently had a conversation with a 39-year-old woman who told me that she was maybe thinking about maybe having children. But it would probably mean she’d have to change careers.

    As a general rule I don’t think 15 y.o. girls getting pregnant is a great idea. When I consider how far towards crazy we’ve gone in the opposite direction, however, I don’t think it’s the worst thing that can happen, by any means. I’ve had several friends who were either born to ~16 y.o. mothers or had children of their own at roughly that age. They and their children are all doing well.

    I know for a fact I would rather have my own daughters become teenage mothers than hit 40 childless, talking as if their dogs are their children, and still pretending like it might happen for them.

    • Agree: BB753, Colin Wright
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Wilkey

    We're all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn't be one solar cycle in one state and another in another. It should be, once you have her, will you hold the vomit bowl when she's sick? You can have any chick you want, but you're stuck with her, for life. We are currently unworthy of this superior policy.

    Replies: @Anon, @TWS

    , @BB753
    @Wilkey

    If not for teenage pregnancy in the Paleolithic, we wouldn't be here as a species.

  141. @El Dato
    @Almost Missouri

    Best 9/11 conspiracies are those which posit technology to accomplish something that can be perfectly accomplished by driving planes into buildings, said technology not even existing 20 years later. It's as if some gamer who knows about reality by playing Metal Gear is let out of the basement. These got to be smokescreens by TLAs to hide the real conspiracies or else fully deranged people somehow managing to stay in the news for 20 f*cking years.

    - Directed energy weapons!
    - Super special explosives that nobody has ever seen!
    - A nuclear device that doesn't blitz onlookers and leaves no radioactivity!
    - Plasma weapons / Fusion power weapons!
    - There were no planes so the planes are created by holographic projectors! (Huh?)
    - There were planes but they were controlled by remote control!
    - There were planes but some were actually cruise missiles!

    The last two are kinda within the realm of the possible but still deranged.

    Replies: @BB753

    You need to watch this documentary. Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @BB753

    Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    The list of the 'lots' begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Mr. Anon, @BB753

  142. @Jack Armstrong
    Breaking news, officials confirm that Sirhan had no involvement with the murder of Emmett Till.

    Replies: @anon

    Wait, are we totally sure about that? Isn’t more investigation still required?

    Oh, wait, silly me. Sirhan^2 is a Person of Color! Of course he wasn’t involved!

    • Agree: Jack Armstrong
  143. anon[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @Abolish_public_education
    Abolish the drug war and eliminate the profit element. Then the drug gangs (not Big Pharma) will move on to other pursuits.

    An overall reduction in the level of violence will reduce the in-flow of felons, thereby ending the scam of parole as a means to de-overcrowd prisons.

    A_p_e will produce similar effects.

    Replies: @anon

    Abolish the drug war and eliminate the profit element. Then the drug gangs (not Big Pharma) will move on to other pursuits.

    Legalizing pot in California does not appear to have affected those cartels that grow illegal weed in the National Forests. They are still doing it, and polluting watercourses in the process. Why do you suppose that is?

    • Replies: @Abolish_public_education
    @anon

    I’m not sure what you’re trying to say about CA pot.

    Dispensaries sell it (with a Rx?). Heads are permitted to grow a few plants
    for themselves. Many grow it for a living. I don’t think they prosecute users caught with small amounts.

    I remember reading recently about a pot farmer who shot trespassers. As pot is still a big, cash crop indicates that it hasn’t been truly legalized, e.g. sold at the grocery store checkout line.

    Nobody ever holds up Safeway and demands smokes.

    Oh, and abolish sin taxes.

    Replies: @TWS

  144. @Alden
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Accident prone is a euphemism for drunk or drugged. Best place to get drunk or do drugs is at home bear a couch or bed.

    Not at a party or bar where you'll have to drive home. Not just before you get on a boat or fly your plane get on a surfboard or sky down the mountain.

    Replies: @anon

    Best place to get drunk or do drugs is at home bear a couch or bed.

    We all acknowledge your deep knowledge base on this topic.

  145. Anonymous[313] • Disclaimer says:
    @TGGP
    My understanding is that MLK conspiracy theories have more traction among African Americans, including MLK's own family. And since the FBI had actually conspired against MLK, it's understandable to think there are larger forces at work. But in the first world lone wackos really outpunch large organizations in the assassination department.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    That reminds me of the death of Sam Cooke, who was shot in self defense by a woman he assaulted while drunk/high. However his friends/relatives claim he was killed as part of a conspiracy by unknown parties, probably at the instigation of his manager (who after Cooke’s death acquired the rights to all of his songs.)

  146. @AndrewR
    @NJ Transit Commuter

    Ok Shlomo.


    In 1989, he told David Frost: "My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians."
     
    Give the guy a medal

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Murderers find it easy to lie.

  147. @El Dato
    @Desiderius

    David French's deep thoughts a like the deep grooves of my bike tires: they collect random stuff that's not easy to look at.

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand? The basic configuration of "Who says what to whom apropos what and why" is sometimes entirely unscrutable. It's like an existentialist theatre piece written by Sartre in not his best moments.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius, @J.Ross

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand?

    Is it hard to understand what is shouted back and forth across the high school lunchroom table?

    Same idea.

    These Twatter samples are usually boring.

  148. @Wilkey
    @Alden


    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant.
     
    I recently had a conversation with a 39-year-old woman who told me that she was maybe thinking about maybe having children. But it would probably mean she'd have to change careers.

    As a general rule I don't think 15 y.o. girls getting pregnant is a great idea. When I consider how far towards crazy we've gone in the opposite direction, however, I don't think it's the worst thing that can happen, by any means. I've had several friends who were either born to ~16 y.o. mothers or had children of their own at roughly that age. They and their children are all doing well.

    I know for a fact I would rather have my own daughters become teenage mothers than hit 40 childless, talking as if their dogs are their children, and still pretending like it might happen for them.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753

    We’re all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn’t be one solar cycle in one state and another in another. It should be, once you have her, will you hold the vomit bowl when she’s sick? You can have any chick you want, but you’re stuck with her, for life. We are currently unworthy of this superior policy.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @J.Ross


    We’re all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn’t be one solar cycle in one state and another in another.
     
    What did the Bible say about age of consent?

    Replies: @J.Ross

    , @TWS
    @J.Ross

    How did Alden miss this comment. I expected an epistle about THE MEN OF UNZ since yesterday.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  149. @SunBakedSuburb
    @Art Deco

    "It's just stupid."

    When are you going to release the pix you took at Roddy McDowall's Escape from the Planet of the Apes wrap party? How did you get your mind so nice and tidy? Did you receive my recent Ancient Aliens newsletter? Tell Steve I have more potatoes than eggs this month so I'll be sending him five pounds of potato salad.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Come in from the sun.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @Reg Cæsar

    "Come in from the sun."

    As soon as the mayonnaise has warmed.

  150. @Mr. Anon

    Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of Robert F. Kennedy assassination, seeks parole with no opposition from prosecutors
     
    That seems fair, given that he may not have actually shot RFK in the first place.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    He shot Kennedy.

    • Agree: David In TN
    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    I've run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid "conspiracy theories" about the JFK and RFK assassinations.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Art Deco

    And you know this............how?

    Oh - that's right - you looked it up on Wikipedia.

  151. @JimDandy
    @Harry Baldwin

    Great book, which I was turned on to by an Unz article. Doesn't this dead Kennedy's son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Paul Jolliffe

    Doesn’t this dead Kennedy’s son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?

    But he thinks Anthony Fauci killed your dad.

    The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

  152. @AnotherDad
    At least an order of magnitude more loathsome is Cuomo's pardon of David Gilbert--the minoritarian terrorist murderer.

    Democrats often reveal their loathsome character by the folks they pardon on the way out.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “Democrats often reveal their loathsome character by the folks they pardon on the way out.”

    You mean unscrupulous politicians regardless of party.

    https://www.nytimes.com/article/who-did-trump-pardon.html

  153. Anonymous[971] • Disclaimer says:
    @Morton's toes
    @Jonathan Mason

    He isn't out yet. Political prisoner is bad fate. See Julian Assange.

    There are a million old Jews who think Sirhan did it because he is anti semitic. Is there a prediction market bet?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    There are a million old Jews who think Sirhan did it because he is anti semitic.

    This is anti-Semitism:

    In 1989, he told David Frost: “My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians.”

  154. @Chris Mallory
    @Art Deco

    The poor in the US should be judged by the standards of the US, not international standards. We are Americans, we are better than the rest of the world.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    The poor in the US should be judged by the standards of the US, not international standards. We are Americans, we are better than the rest of the world.

    Whatever standard you use, obesity is inversely correlated with income in this country, no more than 10% live in crime-ridden slums, 90% have medical insurance, and all but an odd minority live in households where you’ll find an automobile and scads of consumer electronics.

  155. @Abolish_public_education
    @Art Deco

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    I am so sick and tired of:

    • judges who act like lawmakers.
    • lawmakers who act like judges.
    • judges/lawmakers who disavow their own, proper roles.
    • i’net commenters who cheer them on.

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    They also act like lawmakers, in that they dictatorially craft school regulations; judges are reluctant to toss (there’s that disavowal, again).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @kaganovitch

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    It isn’t. Nor should it be.

    • Replies: @Jack Armstrong
    @Art Deco

    Works better as a jury function.

  156. @JimDandy
    @Harry Baldwin

    Great book, which I was turned on to by an Unz article. Doesn't this dead Kennedy's son reject the idea that Sirhan killed his dad?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Paul Jolliffe

    Yes, RFK jr., in very carefully worded language, clearly does not accept the mainstream narrative of his father’s murder.

    Nor do I.

    Actually, nor does the coroner Thomas Noguchi, who performed the autopsy.

    The bullets which struck RFK were not from Sirhan’s gun: a second gunman, firing from behind at point blank range.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/26/who-killed-bobby-kennedy-his-son-rfk-jr-doesnt-believe-it-was-sirhan-sirhan/%3foutputType=amp

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

  157. @Bragadocious
    I'm not sure RFK represented any great choice in '68. He had no brilliant ideas on exiting Vietnam, meaning the war would have continued just as it did. His support for Israel in their lebensraum project was pretty shocking in 1968 given that the entire U.S. State Dept. (and official U.S. policy) was opposed to that land grab, although to be fair the government's cover up on the USS Liberty showed who was really running things. RFK understood all this. Lots of "liberal" Jews in NY cried when he got shot, guys like Jack Newfield...RFK was their puppet and expert goy manipulator.

    So why not release Sirhan. The Brits released Pan Am 103 bomber Megrahi after 8 1/2 years in prison, then told Americans who complained to fuck off.

    Replies: @Peterike

    “ His support for Israel in their lebensraum project was pretty shocking in 1968 given that the entire U.S. State Dept. (and official U.S. policy) was opposed to that land grab”

    He knew who whacked his brother.

  158. I recall the a news radio report at the time it happened. I was ten years old, and the news guy referred to the shooter as “Sir Ham.”

  159. Long as we’re on the topic of tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories, let me toss in my own pet one: the murder of Sen Joseph McCarthy who, towards the end of his run, was as beloved by the Deep State as Mr Trump was/is from Day One of his tenure. Only the Tailgunner’s time was one when, at least compared to ours, terminating troublesome characters without having to worry about high-tech surveillance or cell-phone cameras or any of the seemingly-endless methods our gendarmes have of sniffing out foul play, was one of the perks of political assassination back then.

    I won’t go into the particulars of why I find this notion plausible, but I’d be grateful to be pointed toward anyone, journalist or not, who’s bothered to look into the possibility.

    • Agree: Alden
  160. @Reg Cæsar
    @clifford brown


    Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian.

     

    How "Christian" is murdering a father of eleven?

    Replies: @Alden, @clifford brown

    The point is that Sirhan Sirhan was not a “jihadist”, but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @clifford brown


    ...but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.
     
    In other words, Arabs lack agency. Evidence (along with Somalia's membership in the Arab League) that they're really black.

    MENA = Melanin-Effete Near-Africqn.
    , @Steve Sailer
    @clifford brown

    Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian by ethnicity, like George Habash.

    Replies: @D. K., @S Johnson

    , @TWS
    @clifford brown

    So when Rosie Grier tackled him, someone stuck the gun in his hand and pulled the trigger a few times for good measure.

    Makes me kind of sad. I always admired Rosie.

  161. ‘…Maybe not in the metaphorical sense that he’s less likely than in 1968 to assassinate a major political leader…’

    Moreover, if he did it now, odds are it’d be less distressing.

    …just keep him away from Tulsi Gabbard and Tucker Carlson.

  162. @Wilkey
    @Jonathan Mason

    Not sure what you’re point is? We’re going to be paying these healthcare costs whether they are in prison or not. If they aren’t in prison the bills will just be paid for by Medicare or Medicaid. I guess they should have thought about this when they stopped executing murderers.

    Replies: @Boy the way Glenn Miller played, @TWS

    For once, Mason is right. It’s far more expensive to keep the very sick or old in prison. But right now that’s a smoke screen.

    We don’t know if he’s needing specialized care or not. And probation is a joke. They are not capable of preventing crime except by locking a guy up.

    The other point is that we don’t release political assassins or we shouldn’t. I don’t mind keeping him in for another fifty years.

  163. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    ‘…But aren’t the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day…’

    I can believe Sirhan blanked out. He seems sincere about that.

    Whether that means he was somehow primed to commit the murder or didn’t commit it at all is another matter. One aspect of it all I’ve never heard discussed is whether Sirhan had a history of other such episodes of lost memory before or after the killing. After all, he’s presumably been observed over the fifty years since the killing. Has he spaced out again?

  164. Hey iSteve, you’ve gone soft old man, shouldn’t he be deported to the West Bank or Gaza?

  165. @Alden
    @David In TN

    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant

    The real scandal was his Addison’s brain disease dangerously advanced osteoporosis and prescription drug regime.

    Kennedy’ death was a disaster for Whites. Johnson and Humphrey rammed through civil rights for all but Whites, unlimited non White immigration and worst of all the No Whites Need Apply affirmative action act in just 4 years.

    If anyone other than Oswald did it; it was probably the civil rights for all but Whites Ellis Island descendants. If you know what I mean.

    Kennedy worship is a sign of old age. More so than white hair and wrinkles

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Colin Wright

    ‘One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant…’

    I wouldn’t call it perfectly acceptable. How heinous a crime it is has a lot to do with how it happened and what happens afterwards. Jerry Lee Lewis and Jeffrey Epstein at least belong in different circles of hell.

  166. @Art Deco
    @Mr. Anon

    He shot Kennedy.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Mr. Anon

    I’ve run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid “conspiracy theories” about the JFK and RFK assassinations.

    • Agree: northeast
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @David In TN


    I’ve run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid “conspiracy theories” about the JFK and RFK assassinations.
     
    I've run out of patience for those who unquestioningly believe the pronouncements of government of government-sanctioned white-wash panels and government officials who routinely lie to us.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  167. assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago…

    Ya gotta admit, though, some great music came out of it.

  168. @Sick of Orcs
    If I were Sirhan x2 I'd be memorizing Morgan Freebird's speech from Shawshank.

    I would also have a poster of Duran Duran in my cell and a Little Caesar's "Pizza Pizza!" box cover.

    Replies: @Pratt

    What kind of name is “Sirhan Sirhan” anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for “I’m going to assassinate a kafir”? What’s behind this bizarrerie?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Pratt

    It's a thing in that part of the world, at least among Christians. I once knew an Egyptian Christian called Alexander Alexander. (I guess his family wanted to make sure everyone knew he was of Greek ancestry.)

    Replies: @Ralph L

    , @Art Deco
    @Pratt

    His father was prior to 1948 a technician employed at the water works in Jerusalem. The family was well above the median at the time.

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Pratt


    What kind of name is “Sirhan Sirhan” anyway?
     
    Patronymic. Sirhan Bishara Sirhan is the son of Bishara Sirhan [Whatever] and the grandson of Sirhan [Whatever Whatever].

    His brother was, similarly, Adel Bishara Sirhan:


    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/37324068/adel-bishara-sirhan
    , @Alden
    @Pratt

    Similar to William Williams, Richard Richards Michael Michaels Barry Barry Bailey Bailey Tiffany Tiffany Ryan Ryan Kelly Kelly Kerry Kerry . Sirhan is both a surname and first name

  169. @clifford brown
    @Reg Cæsar

    The point is that Sirhan Sirhan was not a "jihadist", but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Steve Sailer, @TWS

    …but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    In other words, Arabs lack agency. Evidence (along with Somalia’s membership in the Arab League) that they’re really black.

    MENA = Melanin-Effete Near-Africqn.

  170. @Charlesz Martel
    @dearieme

    Like I always say:

    "If guns are outlawed, how will we kill the Kennedys?"

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    A Secretary and an Oldsmobile?

  171. @clifford brown
    @Reg Cæsar

    The point is that Sirhan Sirhan was not a "jihadist", but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Steve Sailer, @TWS

    Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian by ethnicity, like George Habash.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    Christianity is not an ethnicity, Steve. Didn't the clerics get that point across to you, back when you were in high school? What ethnicity were the freedom fighters who blew up the King David Hotel?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    , @S Johnson
    @Steve Sailer

    Sirhan Sirhan’s family weren’t just Christians but Lutherans which is pretty unusual. I would assume that protestant missions in the mid east mostly evangelized among traditional Catholic and Orthodox populations due to the historic penalties against converting from Islam, but perhaps Arabs from smaller Islamic sects were converted too? Does anyone know more?

    Replies: @Alden

  172. @Reg Cæsar

    But I always found RFK conspiracy theorizing boring compared to JFK, the gold standard of conspiracy theories.
     
    JFK got an airport that had destroyed a major urban wetland. RFK got a stadium that hosted the "Redskins" for half a century. It's time to cancel both of them!

    (Fun fact: Canada named a mountain in the Yukon after JFK, and RFK was on the team that first scaled it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kennedy )

    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart... even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.

     

    György Schwartz has 12 years on Uncle Joe. How sharp is his mind today?

    (Fun bet: where will Joe celebrate his 80th birthday?)

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    (Fun fact: Canada named a mountain in the Yukon after JFK, and RFK was on the team that first scaled it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kennedy )

    Thanks.

    The Canadians picked out the tallest unnamed mountain in Canada that was also the tallest unclimbed peak in North America.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Steve Sailer

    Disturbing fact: Kirk LeMoyne Billings was a longtime family friend who had a crush on Jack. Bobby's granddaughter is named Kyra LeMoyne Kennedy.

  173. @Pratt
    @Sick of Orcs

    What kind of name is "Sirhan Sirhan" anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for "I'm going to assassinate a kafir"? What's behind this bizarrerie?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @Alden

    It’s a thing in that part of the world, at least among Christians. I once knew an Egyptian Christian called Alexander Alexander. (I guess his family wanted to make sure everyone knew he was of Greek ancestry.)

    • Replies: @Ralph L
    @Anonymous

    I once knew an Egyptian Christian called Alexander Alexander. (I guess his family wanted to make sure everyone knew he was of Greek ancestry.)

    They really copted out on originality.

  174. @Art Deco
    @Abolish_public_education

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    It isn't. Nor should it be.

    Replies: @Jack Armstrong

    Works better as a jury function.

  175. @Daniel H
    Sirhan has served enough time. I would have paroled. him 20 years ago.

    I would parole that Manson girl too, the cute one.

    Replies: @donut

    While I agree that degree of cuteness should be considered by parole boards past cuteness is irrelevant .

  176. @Steve Sailer
    @clifford brown

    Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian by ethnicity, like George Habash.

    Replies: @D. K., @S Johnson

    Christianity is not an ethnicity, Steve. Didn’t the clerics get that point across to you, back when you were in high school? What ethnicity were the freedom fighters who blew up the King David Hotel?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    Jewish.

  177. @Ralph L

    the only other assassination of a sitting U.S. president, Huey Long in 1935,
     
    I believe you mean senator, not president.

    No question the MLK and RFK killings had hugely bad impacts on the US, and I don't care for either man. The man who shot at FDR early in '33 was executed before his inaugural or soon after. We shouldn't mess around with political murder. OTOH, the man who shot Scalise was quickly dead and his crime forgotten by most.

    Replies: @stillCARealist, @Verymuchalive, @Chris Mallory, @Hibernian

    The man who shot at FDR early in ’33…

    For which read the Mob hitman who successfully whacked Mayor Anton Cermak of Chicago with Roosevelt as a cover story.

    • Replies: @prosa123
    @Hibernian

    Giuseppe Zangara missed Roosevelt and hit Cermak because he was very short, just five feet even according to some reports, and had to stand on a wobbly wooden folding chair to fire over the crowd.

    Replies: @Hibernian

  178. @Anonymous

    After all, Sirhan Sirhan merely single-handedly deprived American voters of a major choice in the making of the President 1968. What’s that compared to George Soros’s war on the New Jim Crow?
     
    What is the evidence that Soros got this prosecutor elected?

    Replies: @Hibernian, @res

    His fingerprints are all over the election of this type of DA in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and st. Louis as well as in California. By which I mean he financed the campaigns.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Hibernian


    His fingerprints are all over the election of this type of DA in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and st. Louis as well as in California. By which I mean he financed the campaigns.
     
    Seems rather vague. How do we know this?
  179. @Paleo Liberal
    A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Art Deco, @J.Ross, @kaganovitch, @Gamecock

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    As a Native American you should have known ” Black man speak with forked tongue”.

  180. @Hibernian
    @Ralph L


    The man who shot at FDR early in ’33...
     
    For which read the Mob hitman who successfully whacked Mayor Anton Cermak of Chicago with Roosevelt as a cover story.

    Replies: @prosa123

    Giuseppe Zangara missed Roosevelt and hit Cermak because he was very short, just five feet even according to some reports, and had to stand on a wobbly wooden folding chair to fire over the crowd.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @prosa123

    Roosevelt wasn't all that close to Cermak (at the moment of the shooting, I mean.)

  181. @Paul Jolliffe
    @JimDandy

    Yes, RFK jr., in very carefully worded language, clearly does not accept the mainstream narrative of his father’s murder.

    Nor do I.

    Actually, nor does the coroner Thomas Noguchi, who performed the autopsy.

    The bullets which struck RFK were not from Sirhan’s gun: a second gunman, firing from behind at point blank range.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/26/who-killed-bobby-kennedy-his-son-rfk-jr-doesnt-believe-it-was-sirhan-sirhan/%3foutputType=amp

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    But in the abstract, wouldn’t it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I’d be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    • Replies: @Paul Jolliffe
    @Steve Sailer

    Actually, a number of witnesses did see a second gun in the hand of the guard immediately behind RFK, pointed up and adjacent to Kennedy’s right shoulder.
    Did he fire?
    We don’t know- the LAPD never tested his gun.
    Some investigation . . .

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Alden

    , @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    What would you have been doing if you were a neophyte security guard, on his first assignment, and were walking the candidate through the crowded kitchen pantry, unexpectedly, while holding his right arm with your left hand, when someone in front of you both suddenly opened fire with a small-caliber handgun, unexpectedly?

    Replies: @Alden

    , @Alden
    @Steve Sailer

    There’s always Another Gunman somewhere.

    The grassy knoll, window of the State Office Building down the street, the sewer drains in the curbs, the railroad bridge, behind the stalled city bus , the strange man pretending to be a worker running around the building . The man in the gray suit standing in the street ( George Bush sr ) the policeman Thibideaux whose job it was to drive Oswald to safety but was shot by one of the many Oswald imposters running about that day. Latest is the secret service man driver shot and killed Kennedy. Enjoyable historical fiction book Nemesis claims Mrs Kennedy’s second husband Onassis had Kennedy killed to avoid the trouble of a divorce.

    2,000 books 2,000 Other Gunmen.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    RFK Jr., upon the death of the security guard:

    ***

    Thane Eugene Cesar died today in the Philippines. Compelling evidence suggests that Cesar murdered my father. On June 5, 1968, Cesar, an employee in a classified section of Lockheed’s Burbank facility, was moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel. He had landed the job about one week earlier. Cesar waited in the pantry as my father spoke in the ballroom, then grabbed my father by the elbow and guided him toward Sirhan. With 77 people in the pantry, every eyewitness said Sirhan was always in front on my father at a 3-6 feet distance. Sirhan fired two shots toward my father before he was tackled. From under the dog pile, Sirhan emptied his 8 chamber revolver firing 6 more shots in the opposite direction 5 of them striking bystander and one going wild . By his own account, Cesar was directly behind my dad holding his right elbow with his own gun drawn when my dad fell backwards on top of him. Cesar repeatedly changed his story about exactly when he drew his weapon. According to the Coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, all 4 shots that struck my father were ‘contact’ shots fired from behind my dad with the barrel touching or nearly touching his body. Cesar sold his .22 to a co-worker weeks after the assassination warning him that it had been used in a crime. Cesar lied to police claiming that he’d disposed of the gun months before the assassination. Cesar was a bigot who hated the Kennedys for their advocacy of Civil Rights for blacks. I had plans to meet Thane Eugene Cesar in the Philippines last June until he demanded a payment of $25,000 through his agent Dan Moldea. Ironically, Moldea penned a meticulous and compelling indictment of Cesar in a 1995 book and then suddenly exculpated him by fiat in a bizarre and nonsensical final chapter. Police have never seriously investigated Cesar’s role in my father’s killing.

    ***

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman, @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    , @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    "After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK?"

    ***

    What do eyewitnesses say? Kennedy was killed in a crowded room. Thus, there were many people in a position to explain what they saw, and, so they did, but as is often true in the case of eyewitnesses, they diverge.

    Multiple witnesses saw Thane Cesar pull out his gun, but only one accused him of firing it, which Cesar has denied over the years. The key witness cited by many believers of the second gunman theory is a man named Don Schulman, who was then a runner for KNXT-TV.

    He gave an interview at the scene to a local television reporter. “Well, I was standing directly behind him. I saw a man pull out a gun. It looked like he pulled it out of his pocket. He shot three times. I saw all three shots hit the senator. Then, I saw the senator fall and was picked up and carried away. I also saw the security men pull out their weapons. After that, it was very fuzzy. The next thing I knew, there were several shots fired. I saw a woman with blood come out of her temple… I saw the security police grab someone… the crowd was very panicky.”

    The site RFKProject says Schuman appears in this video at 2:42, confirming he was there that day. The police report on Schulman’s statement doesn’t mention the security guard angle.

    Schulman later grew more confident about what he says he saw when speaking to Ted Charach for a controversial documentary Charach made putting forth the second gunman theory. He said he was “following the senator….we were packed in there like sardines….another man stepped out and he shot. Just then the guard who was standing behind Kennedy, he took out his gun, and he fired also.” He said that Sirhan Sirhan was about 3 to 6 feet behind Kennedy, but that the guard was standing on the right hand side, directly and behind Kennedy. He said he told the story to several police authorities. He added, “The guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired.”

    Schulman also said, “A Caucasian gentleman stepped out and fired. The security guard hit Kennedy all three times. Kennedy slumped to the floor. The security guard fired back…” One Schulman statement was taken by a reporter named Jeff Brent. He later alleged to Charach, a researcher, “… a guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired… He wasn’t very far from Kennedy.” Again, Schulman’s account is unproven, other witnesses did not allege the same, and Cesar denies firing his gun, which he says was a different caliber from the .22 that took Kennedy’s life.

    ***

    https://heavy.com/news/2019/09/thane-eugene-cesar-rfk/

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe

  182. @Art Deco
    He's been in prison for 53 years. He is guilty of killing one person with a handgun and guilty of political assassination. Whether he qualifies for parole or not should depend on whether or not he has served the mandatory minimum (he apparently has) and the degree to which he has been a disciplinary problem in prison.

    The real outrage is the commutation granted Chesa Boudin's father in New York. If New York had a sane schedule of penalties, participation in an armed robbery which resulted in the deaths of three people would bring down a capital sentence on all of the participants. Chesa's papa should have been put in front of a firing squad 30+ years ago.

    Remember Emily Harris of the Symbionese Liberation Army fame? She was a participant in one kidnapping for ransom (no clue about about California; that's an A-I felony in New York) and three armed robberies. She's likely guilty of harboring two men guilty of one premeditated murder and one attempted murder. Most importantly, she murdered a pregnant woman in the course of one of those armed robberies. This array of crimes should have sufficed to get her locked up for about 50 years if not executed. She actually served 12 years. For whatever reason, the felony murder rule was never applied to her and it took the Stupidstan of California 27 years to prosecute her for the murder of Myrna Opsahl; she was permitted to plead and paroled after four years. Our judiciary is a a scandal.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Alden, @Hibernian

    “..and guilty of political assassination.”

    For which he should have gotten death and should now serve for life.

  183. “For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.”

    I thought Soros ruined his reputation 80 years ago in Hungary.

  184. The fact that the communist White hating DA Gascón won’t oppose the parole doesn’t mean Sirhan will be paroled. It just means the hard left White hating DA announced the won’t oppose the parole. To get more Soros democrat BLM antifa donations and votes for his next election and next elected office. Maybe state attorney general . Parole decisions are made by the parole board.

  185. @Abolish_public_education
    @Art Deco

    Determination and imposition of sentence is the exclusive power of the judiciary.

    I am so sick and tired of:

    • judges who act like lawmakers.
    • lawmakers who act like judges.
    • judges/lawmakers who disavow their own, proper roles.
    • i’net commenters who cheer them on.

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    They also act like lawmakers, in that they dictatorially craft school regulations; judges are reluctant to toss (there’s that disavowal, again).

    Replies: @Art Deco, @kaganovitch

    Public school bureaucrats (executive) act like judge and jury, e.g. they punish kids, with penalties ranging from detention to expulsion, without fair trial, much less conviction there.

    You really stay on message. Perhaps you could give TED talks or the like to GOP pols and teach them how it’s done?

    • Agree: William Badwhite
  186. @BB753
    @El Dato

    You need to watch this documentary. Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.
    https://youtu.be/xEZAXFbAnbA

    Replies: @Art Deco

    Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    The list of the ‘lots’ begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Art Deco

    I recall an episode of Car Talk where someone was presenting an argument made by someone else and the host said something along the line: 'He's an engineer, isn't he.'

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Art Deco


    The list of the ‘lots’ begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.
     
    Steven Jones is a physicist, not an electrochemist. What gives, Art? I thought you were infallible?
    , @BB753
    @Art Deco

    I've never met an architect who could buy the official story either.

  187. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

    Actually, a number of witnesses did see a second gun in the hand of the guard immediately behind RFK, pointed up and adjacent to Kennedy’s right shoulder.
    Did he fire?
    We don’t know- the LAPD never tested his gun.
    Some investigation . . .

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    OK, but how would that absolve Sirhan? An extreme vase of felony murder.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K.

    , @Alden
    @Paul Jolliffe

    Appalling shocking news!!!!! !!!!!!!! Security guards carry guns and when an assassin pulls a gun in the same room the protectee is in the security guard does what is required in his job description. Pulls out his own gun.

    The MEN OF UNZ the MEN OF UNZ , no common sense , so incredibly naive and ignorant. In this case ignorant of what security guards do.

    Replies: @D. K.

  188. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

    What would you have been doing if you were a neophyte security guard, on his first assignment, and were walking the candidate through the crowded kitchen pantry, unexpectedly, while holding his right arm with your left hand, when someone in front of you both suddenly opened fire with a small-caliber handgun, unexpectedly?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @D. K.

    But according to the Sirhan Didn’t Do It theory the security guard wasn’t a neophyte on his first assignment but a well trained and experienced Illuminati Zionist CIA assassin.

    Replies: @D. K.

  189. @Pratt
    @Sick of Orcs

    What kind of name is "Sirhan Sirhan" anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for "I'm going to assassinate a kafir"? What's behind this bizarrerie?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @Alden

    His father was prior to 1948 a technician employed at the water works in Jerusalem. The family was well above the median at the time.

  190. @Paleo Liberal
    @J.Ross

    You make an excellent point.

    People often believe what they want to believe.

    Here is an alternate explanation:

    J. Edgar Hoover was not a fan of MLK, and kept him under constant surveillance. By coincidence, some agents sent to watch after MLK on that particular event had previously been assigned to Dallas for JFK’s visit.

    Coincidence sometimes happens. Sometimes news reports surface of people who, Forest Gump style, somehow wind up at infamous events more than once.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    Alternative hypothesis: it’s an urban legend. Who would be storing 30 year old hotel registers and why?

  191. @Art Deco
    @BB753

    Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    The list of the 'lots' begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Mr. Anon, @BB753

    I recall an episode of Car Talk where someone was presenting an argument made by someone else and the host said something along the line: ‘He’s an engineer, isn’t he.’

  192. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

    There’s always Another Gunman somewhere.

    The grassy knoll, window of the State Office Building down the street, the sewer drains in the curbs, the railroad bridge, behind the stalled city bus , the strange man pretending to be a worker running around the building . The man in the gray suit standing in the street ( George Bush sr ) the policeman Thibideaux whose job it was to drive Oswald to safety but was shot by one of the many Oswald imposters running about that day. Latest is the secret service man driver shot and killed Kennedy. Enjoyable historical fiction book Nemesis claims Mrs Kennedy’s second husband Onassis had Kennedy killed to avoid the trouble of a divorce.

    2,000 books 2,000 Other Gunmen.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    There are two exclusive possibilities about the unending exposition of conspiracy theories of the JFK assassination: to the extent that those theories can reasonably be said to be distinct from one another, either one of those conspiracy theories is essentially correct, while all of the other conspiracy theories are essentially incorrect, or else all of the conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect. Even if all of the conspiracy theories ever posited for the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect, however, that does not mean that the Warren Commission's official conclusion that Lee Oswald was essentially the proverbial "lone nut" assassin is correct. There are two other logical, if unlikely, possibilities: either another distinct conspiracy scenario, not yet hypothesized, was responsible for JFK's death, or else an additional assassin, independent and unaware of Lee Oswald's presence and intentions, fired the fatal head shot that killed President Kennedy.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

  193. @Anonymous
    @Pratt

    It's a thing in that part of the world, at least among Christians. I once knew an Egyptian Christian called Alexander Alexander. (I guess his family wanted to make sure everyone knew he was of Greek ancestry.)

    Replies: @Ralph L

    I once knew an Egyptian Christian called Alexander Alexander. (I guess his family wanted to make sure everyone knew he was of Greek ancestry.)

    They really copted out on originality.

  194. @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    I've run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid "conspiracy theories" about the JFK and RFK assassinations.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    I’ve run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid “conspiracy theories” about the JFK and RFK assassinations.

    I’ve run out of patience for those who unquestioningly believe the pronouncements of government of government-sanctioned white-wash panels and government officials who routinely lie to us.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Mr. Anon

    You've all had 56 years to delineate an alternative to the Warren Commission's findings. And by that, I mean you start with the event itself and build your case concentrically. The best of the Warren Commission's detractors would be Josiah Thompson and Cyril Wecht, because they actually engage in inductive reasoning. Their efforts to just call into question certain points (without building an alternative understanding) have not succeeded. Wecht speaks with the most authority because he's a forensic pathologist, but his current argument centers on bullet trajectories (a subject on which he does not speak with authority).

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

  195. @Art Deco
    @Mr. Anon

    He shot Kennedy.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Mr. Anon

    And you know this…………how?

    Oh – that’s right – you looked it up on Wikipedia.

  196. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

    RFK Jr., upon the death of the security guard:

    ***

    Thane Eugene Cesar died today in the Philippines. Compelling evidence suggests that Cesar murdered my father. On June 5, 1968, Cesar, an employee in a classified section of Lockheed’s Burbank facility, was moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel. He had landed the job about one week earlier. Cesar waited in the pantry as my father spoke in the ballroom, then grabbed my father by the elbow and guided him toward Sirhan. With 77 people in the pantry, every eyewitness said Sirhan was always in front on my father at a 3-6 feet distance. Sirhan fired two shots toward my father before he was tackled. From under the dog pile, Sirhan emptied his 8 chamber revolver firing 6 more shots in the opposite direction 5 of them striking bystander and one going wild . By his own account, Cesar was directly behind my dad holding his right elbow with his own gun drawn when my dad fell backwards on top of him. Cesar repeatedly changed his story about exactly when he drew his weapon. According to the Coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, all 4 shots that struck my father were ‘contact’ shots fired from behind my dad with the barrel touching or nearly touching his body. Cesar sold his .22 to a co-worker weeks after the assassination warning him that it had been used in a crime. Cesar lied to police claiming that he’d disposed of the gun months before the assassination. Cesar was a bigot who hated the Kennedys for their advocacy of Civil Rights for blacks. I had plans to meet Thane Eugene Cesar in the Philippines last June until he demanded a payment of $25,000 through his agent Dan Moldea. Ironically, Moldea penned a meticulous and compelling indictment of Cesar in a 1995 book and then suddenly exculpated him by fiat in a bizarre and nonsensical final chapter. Police have never seriously investigated Cesar’s role in my father’s killing.

    ***

    • Replies: @but an humble craftsman
    @D. K.

    Thank you.
    This post by Mr. Sailer was utterly disappointing.
    The victim's family has long asked for a pardon.
    They have made very clear that they do not believe the man convicted for the murder was the actual murderer.
    Strange that Mr. Sailer should not expound on this unusual fact.

    , @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    One of RFK Jr.'s interventions on a criminal case was to attempt to get a pair of his maternal-side cousins off the hook for murdering a young woman in Greenwich, Ct. whose name was Martha Moxley. In RFK Jr's reading, the 'evidence' supposedly 'implicated' one Edward Littleton, one of two men harassed by the clueless Greenwich police department in 1975-76. Mr. Littleton was a schoolteacher hired by RFK Jr.'s uncle to tutor some of his children; he'd moved his gear into their home the day Miss Moxley was killed. Evidence against Mr. Littleton was nil. The Greenwich police hadn't had a murder to investigate in 38 years, and could not or would not turn the case over to the state police. The two detectives on the case got the idea in their head that a juvenile could not have committed the crime, so ignored the late Miss Moxley's social circle (including the last person with whom she'd been seen, Ethel Kennedy's nephew Thos. Skakel). RFK Jr doesn't rank high on the 'good judgment' or 'integrity' scales.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    Mr. Cesar must have been a very brave man to march RFK right to Sirhan knowing Sirhan was going to shoot him (and quite possibley Cesar as well).

    Replies: @D. K.

  197. @Art Deco
    @BB753

    Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    The list of the 'lots' begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Mr. Anon, @BB753

    The list of the ‘lots’ begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    Steven Jones is a physicist, not an electrochemist. What gives, Art? I thought you were infallible?

  198. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    What would you have been doing if you were a neophyte security guard, on his first assignment, and were walking the candidate through the crowded kitchen pantry, unexpectedly, while holding his right arm with your left hand, when someone in front of you both suddenly opened fire with a small-caliber handgun, unexpectedly?

    Replies: @Alden

    But according to the Sirhan Didn’t Do It theory the security guard wasn’t a neophyte on his first assignment but a well trained and experienced Illuminati Zionist CIA assassin.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    Feel free to list by name all of the proponents of that particular theory-- which you (unimaginatively) would seem to believe is the only alternative theory of the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy-- along with links (if available) to their saying precisely that.

    As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution's (or defense's) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan's position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution's theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be.

    Replies: @Alden, @Alden

  199. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    But in the abstract, wouldn't it be more plausible that the second gunman would be hiding himself by being _further_ away from RFK, the focus of all eyes, the man of the hour, than the few feet away from RFK that Sirhan was standing?

    After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK? If I were a highly trained assassin who was supposed to deliver the fatal shot while Sirhan created a diversion next to the world famous politician, I'd be over in the corner where nobody would notice me.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K., @Alden, @D. K., @D. K.

    “After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK?”

    ***

    What do eyewitnesses say? Kennedy was killed in a crowded room. Thus, there were many people in a position to explain what they saw, and, so they did, but as is often true in the case of eyewitnesses, they diverge.

    Multiple witnesses saw Thane Cesar pull out his gun, but only one accused him of firing it, which Cesar has denied over the years. The key witness cited by many believers of the second gunman theory is a man named Don Schulman, who was then a runner for KNXT-TV.

    He gave an interview at the scene to a local television reporter. “Well, I was standing directly behind him. I saw a man pull out a gun. It looked like he pulled it out of his pocket. He shot three times. I saw all three shots hit the senator. Then, I saw the senator fall and was picked up and carried away. I also saw the security men pull out their weapons. After that, it was very fuzzy. The next thing I knew, there were several shots fired. I saw a woman with blood come out of her temple… I saw the security police grab someone… the crowd was very panicky.”

    The site RFKProject says Schuman appears in this video at 2:42, confirming he was there that day. The police report on Schulman’s statement doesn’t mention the security guard angle.

    Schulman later grew more confident about what he says he saw when speaking to Ted Charach for a controversial documentary Charach made putting forth the second gunman theory. He said he was “following the senator….we were packed in there like sardines….another man stepped out and he shot. Just then the guard who was standing behind Kennedy, he took out his gun, and he fired also.” He said that Sirhan Sirhan was about 3 to 6 feet behind Kennedy, but that the guard was standing on the right hand side, directly and behind Kennedy. He said he told the story to several police authorities. He added, “The guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired.”

    Schulman also said, “A Caucasian gentleman stepped out and fired. The security guard hit Kennedy all three times. Kennedy slumped to the floor. The security guard fired back…” One Schulman statement was taken by a reporter named Jeff Brent. He later alleged to Charach, a researcher, “… a guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired… He wasn’t very far from Kennedy.” Again, Schulman’s account is unproven, other witnesses did not allege the same, and Cesar denies firing his gun, which he says was a different caliber from the .22 that took Kennedy’s life.

    ***

    https://heavy.com/news/2019/09/thane-eugene-cesar-rfk/

    • Replies: @Paul Jolliffe
    @D. K.

    D.K., as undoubtedly know, Cesar did indeed own a . 22 on June 4, 1968. Further he later lied when he alleged that he had previously sold that .22.
    Proof came in the form of a receipt from a cash sale of that gun, a receipt in Cesar’s own handwriting.
    Finally, that gun was (remarkably) recovered from a lake in Arkansas in 2006, apparently too degraded to determine a ballistic match.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/amp/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

  200. @anon
    @Abolish_public_education

    Abolish the drug war and eliminate the profit element. Then the drug gangs (not Big Pharma) will move on to other pursuits.

    Legalizing pot in California does not appear to have affected those cartels that grow illegal weed in the National Forests. They are still doing it, and polluting watercourses in the process. Why do you suppose that is?

    Replies: @Abolish_public_education

    I’m not sure what you’re trying to say about CA pot.

    Dispensaries sell it (with a Rx?). Heads are permitted to grow a few plants
    for themselves. Many grow it for a living. I don’t think they prosecute users caught with small amounts.

    I remember reading recently about a pot farmer who shot trespassers. As pot is still a big, cash crop indicates that it hasn’t been truly legalized, e.g. sold at the grocery store checkout line.

    Nobody ever holds up Safeway and demands smokes.

    Oh, and abolish sin taxes.

    • Replies: @TWS
    @Abolish_public_education

    Nope. Sin taxes work perfectly if properly balanced. Too high and you get too much bootlegging and illegal production. Too low and you get over indulgence and the problems associated with that.

  201. @J.Ross
    @Wilkey

    We're all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn't be one solar cycle in one state and another in another. It should be, once you have her, will you hold the vomit bowl when she's sick? You can have any chick you want, but you're stuck with her, for life. We are currently unworthy of this superior policy.

    Replies: @Anon, @TWS

    We’re all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn’t be one solar cycle in one state and another in another.

    What did the Bible say about age of consent?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Anon

    You weren't born together but you'll die together. Oh, wait, that was the Three Kingdoms.

  202. @Hibernian
    @Anonymous

    His fingerprints are all over the election of this type of DA in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and st. Louis as well as in California. By which I mean he financed the campaigns.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    His fingerprints are all over the election of this type of DA in Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, and st. Louis as well as in California. By which I mean he financed the campaigns.

    Seems rather vague. How do we know this?

  203. @Buffalo Joe
    @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan, I was surprised to learn that a sentence of 'Life in Prison without the Possibility of Parole' does not mean you are never going to be free. You just can't be paroled out. However, these sentences can be commuted to time served. California governor Jerry Brown commuted the sentences of at least 6 murderers before he left office.

    Replies: @mikeInThe716

    So Sirhan, the murderer of a senator, sentenced originally to death, then life imprisonment, can get paroled now for being, I guess, elderly???

    Mark David Chapman was sentenced to “20 to life” in 1981. He is 66. Since 2002, he gets a parole hearing every other year. Any chance a woke Manhattan DA will be neutral on a future hearing?

    Probably not – but, if Chapman had murdered a nobody New Yorker, he’d be out. So, will some SJW prosecutor play that angle to annoy boomer moderates? Is THAT any more nuts that the Sirhan parole logic?

  204. @Steve Sailer
    @Reg Cæsar

    (Fun fact: Canada named a mountain in the Yukon after JFK, and RFK was on the team that first scaled it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kennedy )

    Thanks.

    The Canadians picked out the tallest unnamed mountain in Canada that was also the tallest unclimbed peak in North America.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Disturbing fact: Kirk LeMoyne Billings was a longtime family friend who had a crush on Jack. Bobby’s granddaughter is named Kyra LeMoyne Kennedy.

  205. Sirhan Sirhan? You’ve got to be joking.

    We are free to believe the official version, and we are free to believe the conspiracy versions, but seldom do we consider, or are presented with, the third, often most basic and obvious option.

    Kennedy didn’t die. http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf
    Neither did Bobby.

    It’s sort of like all the people who say “Epstein didn’t kill himself.” Rarely, if ever, do you hear “Epstein didn’t die.” This, despite the drone footage spotting him safely back on his island after his “death.”

    Kennedy was also in all likelihood gay. http://mileswmathis.com/jfkgay.pdf

    • Replies: @TWS
    @WaffleStaffel

    Funniest Unz comment in months. Makes The Duck larper look lame.

    Replies: @WaffleStaffel

  206. @Pratt
    @Sick of Orcs

    What kind of name is "Sirhan Sirhan" anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for "I'm going to assassinate a kafir"? What's behind this bizarrerie?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @Alden

    What kind of name is “Sirhan Sirhan” anyway?

    Patronymic. Sirhan Bishara Sirhan is the son of Bishara Sirhan [Whatever] and the grandson of Sirhan [Whatever Whatever].

    His brother was, similarly, Adel Bishara Sirhan:

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/37324068/adel-bishara-sirhan

  207. @Alden
    @D. K.

    But according to the Sirhan Didn’t Do It theory the security guard wasn’t a neophyte on his first assignment but a well trained and experienced Illuminati Zionist CIA assassin.

    Replies: @D. K.

    Feel free to list by name all of the proponents of that particular theory– which you (unimaginatively) would seem to believe is the only alternative theory of the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy– along with links (if available) to their saying precisely that.

    As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution’s (or defense’s) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan’s position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution’s theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @D. K.

    You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @Alden
    @D. K.

    Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law.

    Replies: @D. K.

  208. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    RFK Jr., upon the death of the security guard:

    ***

    Thane Eugene Cesar died today in the Philippines. Compelling evidence suggests that Cesar murdered my father. On June 5, 1968, Cesar, an employee in a classified section of Lockheed’s Burbank facility, was moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel. He had landed the job about one week earlier. Cesar waited in the pantry as my father spoke in the ballroom, then grabbed my father by the elbow and guided him toward Sirhan. With 77 people in the pantry, every eyewitness said Sirhan was always in front on my father at a 3-6 feet distance. Sirhan fired two shots toward my father before he was tackled. From under the dog pile, Sirhan emptied his 8 chamber revolver firing 6 more shots in the opposite direction 5 of them striking bystander and one going wild . By his own account, Cesar was directly behind my dad holding his right elbow with his own gun drawn when my dad fell backwards on top of him. Cesar repeatedly changed his story about exactly when he drew his weapon. According to the Coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, all 4 shots that struck my father were ‘contact’ shots fired from behind my dad with the barrel touching or nearly touching his body. Cesar sold his .22 to a co-worker weeks after the assassination warning him that it had been used in a crime. Cesar lied to police claiming that he’d disposed of the gun months before the assassination. Cesar was a bigot who hated the Kennedys for their advocacy of Civil Rights for blacks. I had plans to meet Thane Eugene Cesar in the Philippines last June until he demanded a payment of $25,000 through his agent Dan Moldea. Ironically, Moldea penned a meticulous and compelling indictment of Cesar in a 1995 book and then suddenly exculpated him by fiat in a bizarre and nonsensical final chapter. Police have never seriously investigated Cesar’s role in my father’s killing.

    ***

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman, @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    Thank you.
    This post by Mr. Sailer was utterly disappointing.
    The victim’s family has long asked for a pardon.
    They have made very clear that they do not believe the man convicted for the murder was the actual murderer.
    Strange that Mr. Sailer should not expound on this unusual fact.

  209. @Pratt
    @Sick of Orcs

    What kind of name is "Sirhan Sirhan" anyway? Were the Palestinians to poor at the time of his birth to be able to afford two different names? Were they too blockheaded to remember two, and so repeated one? Is it code for "I'm going to assassinate a kafir"? What's behind this bizarrerie?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @Alden

    Similar to William Williams, Richard Richards Michael Michaels Barry Barry Bailey Bailey Tiffany Tiffany Ryan Ryan Kelly Kelly Kerry Kerry . Sirhan is both a surname and first name

  210. @Alden
    @Steve Sailer

    There’s always Another Gunman somewhere.

    The grassy knoll, window of the State Office Building down the street, the sewer drains in the curbs, the railroad bridge, behind the stalled city bus , the strange man pretending to be a worker running around the building . The man in the gray suit standing in the street ( George Bush sr ) the policeman Thibideaux whose job it was to drive Oswald to safety but was shot by one of the many Oswald imposters running about that day. Latest is the secret service man driver shot and killed Kennedy. Enjoyable historical fiction book Nemesis claims Mrs Kennedy’s second husband Onassis had Kennedy killed to avoid the trouble of a divorce.

    2,000 books 2,000 Other Gunmen.

    Replies: @D. K.

    There are two exclusive possibilities about the unending exposition of conspiracy theories of the JFK assassination: to the extent that those theories can reasonably be said to be distinct from one another, either one of those conspiracy theories is essentially correct, while all of the other conspiracy theories are essentially incorrect, or else all of the conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect. Even if all of the conspiracy theories ever posited for the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect, however, that does not mean that the Warren Commission’s official conclusion that Lee Oswald was essentially the proverbial “lone nut” assassin is correct. There are two other logical, if unlikely, possibilities: either another distinct conspiracy scenario, not yet hypothesized, was responsible for JFK’s death, or else an additional assassin, independent and unaware of Lee Oswald’s presence and intentions, fired the fatal head shot that killed President Kennedy.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    There aren't any conspiracy theories. There has been a stew of speculation, but not testable models constructed by abstracting from known facts. (Other than David Lifton's bad comedy). Assembling known data, you learn that Lee Harvey Oswald killed the President and wounded Gov. Connolly. Who were his collaborators or employers? If your hypothesis is that it was a conspiracy, that's your first question to investigate.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    Stephen Hunter's novel "The Third Bullet" is a tour d'force of theorizing how the anti-JFK conspiracy books could be factually correct, but it still could be a conspiracy.

  211. @D. K.
    @Alden

    Feel free to list by name all of the proponents of that particular theory-- which you (unimaginatively) would seem to believe is the only alternative theory of the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy-- along with links (if available) to their saying precisely that.

    As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution's (or defense's) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan's position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution's theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be.

    Replies: @Alden, @Alden

    You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    "You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual."

    You should have addressed the evidence of the case that I laid out in the comment to which you were responding. You failed to do so. "As usual."

    Feel welcome to try this again, Alden:

    "As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution’s (or defense’s) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    "As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan’s position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution’s theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be."

    Now, pray tell, what was so comically mistaken about anything that I wrote in those two paragraphs?

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman

  212. @D. K.
    @Alden

    Feel free to list by name all of the proponents of that particular theory-- which you (unimaginatively) would seem to believe is the only alternative theory of the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy-- along with links (if available) to their saying precisely that.

    As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution's (or defense's) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan's position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution's theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be.

    Replies: @Alden, @Alden

    Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law."

    Did you make it through your first week of Criminal Law, Alden, let alone through Trial Advocacy? The prosecution bases its entire presentation at trial on fitting its evidence into its theory of the crime; it makes its opening and closing arguments-- which likewise are not evidence-- by fitting the evidence to match its theory of the crime. Motive is not an element of the crime-- except for "hate crimes"-- but the prosecution is relentless in trying to convince the trier of fact, whether jury or judge, that the accused had the motive to do what it charges was done.

    "All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence."

    Did a Basic Legal Skills instructor actually pass a law student who ever wrote such a sentence?!? Mine promised to flunk any of us who wrote "judgement" rather than "judgment"-- the dictionary notwithstanding!

    Replies: @Alden

  213. Well, I only glanced at the comments in this long thread, but I think some of Sirhan’s remarkable personal abilities should come into the discussion.

    According to the official LA Coroner’s report at the time, the fatal bullet that killed RFK was fired at the back of his head at point-blank range, probably from within an inch or two. Meanwhile, all the eyewitnesses agree that Sirhan was standing several feet in front of him.

    An audio tape reveals that at least a dozen shots were fired, but Sirhan’s gun only held eight rounds.

    Those facts clearly demonstrate Sirhan possessed magical abilities, and we can only guess why he never bothered teleporting himself out of prison over the last half-century, even though he could have very easily done so.

    Anyone interested in reading more of the interesting details of the RFK assassination might want to take a look at the relevant portion of my very long article from a year or two ago:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-mossad-assassinations/#p_1_142

    A shorter, more focused analysis of the Kennedy assassinations is provided here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-ii-who-did-it/

    • Thanks: JohnnyWalker123
    • LOL: Buzz Mohawk
  214. @Alden
    @D. K.

    Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law.

    Replies: @D. K.

    “Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law.”

    Did you make it through your first week of Criminal Law, Alden, let alone through Trial Advocacy? The prosecution bases its entire presentation at trial on fitting its evidence into its theory of the crime; it makes its opening and closing arguments– which likewise are not evidence– by fitting the evidence to match its theory of the crime. Motive is not an element of the crime– except for “hate crimes”– but the prosecution is relentless in trying to convince the trier of fact, whether jury or judge, that the accused had the motive to do what it charges was done.

    “All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence.”

    Did a Basic Legal Skills instructor actually pass a law student who ever wrote such a sentence?!? Mine promised to flunk any of us who wrote “judgement” rather than “judgment”– the dictionary notwithstanding!

    • Replies: @Alden
    @D. K.

    Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes. And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @D. K.

  215. Kennedy made a lot of enemies. This is why the conspiracy-theorizing is so fruitful. So many people had motive to whack him.

    Personally I think Oswald did it, but since nobody actually saw him pull the trigger, there will always be an element of doubt.

  216. @Alden
    @D. K.

    You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual.

    Replies: @D. K.

    “You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual.”

    You should have addressed the evidence of the case that I laid out in the comment to which you were responding. You failed to do so. “As usual.”

    Feel welcome to try this again, Alden:

    “As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution’s (or defense’s) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    “As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan’s position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution’s theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be.”

    Now, pray tell, what was so comically mistaken about anything that I wrote in those two paragraphs?

    • Replies: @but an humble craftsman
    @D. K.

    Do not feed the troll.
    She is on a roll.

    There are threads where she makes interesting contributions.
    This is not one of them.

  217. @Anonymous

    After all, Sirhan Sirhan merely single-handedly deprived American voters of a major choice in the making of the President 1968. What’s that compared to George Soros’s war on the New Jim Crow?
     
    What is the evidence that Soros got this prosecutor elected?

    Replies: @Hibernian, @res

    Article about Gascón. Not much explicit evidence given, but if you care so much how about you dig into it?
    https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/george-gascon-rogue-prosecutor-whose-extreme-policies-undermine-the-rule

    Here’s some better evidence.
    https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/soros-dumps-another-2-5-million-into-gascons-race-for-los-angeles-da/

    Flash forward to 2020: Soros has already funded more than $2.5 million of George Gascón’s race for Los Angeles District Attorney.

  218. @dearieme
    @David In TN

    If their only target had been JFK that's a telling point. But if their purpose had been to scare every leading American politician wouldn't assassination be best?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Ragno

    There are a few people around who think Trump literally dodged a bullet getting jobbed last November – that, Kushner or no Kushner, he would not have survived a second term.

  219. “I sincerely regret my actions,” Sirhan told Frost. “I was young, I was immature, I was wild … I wish that I could reverse all my actions concerning Robert Kennedy.”

  220. @Altai
    But aren't the cohorts of people most likely to be angry at somebody who shot RFK also the ones most likely to have sympathy for Sirhan Sirhan or to be less punitive in general? He is also odd in continuing to plead his innocence to this day. And, it seems likely that many in the Kennedy clan are suspicious of his guilt.

    Anyway, my regular newsletter from Nature came in my inbox today and for the last 4 or 5 years has obliged itself to almost always have some kind of hectoring SJW silliness at the top on the front page (With often quite interesting content much lower down) often an opinion piece of little to no scientific value or claiming 'racism' where there isn't any. Today's is just below the second piece.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02288-x

    Too many scientists still say Caucasian
    Racist ideas of categories for human identity continue to warp research and medicine.
    Alice B. Popejoy

    She is a population geneticist and bioinformatician and in a piece that seemed to just be about how the term 'Caucasian' is weird and should be universally replaced with 'European' because it's racist (Not because it's just weird and unused outside the US where it paradoxically is used as a PC term for 'white') she writes this:


    Of the ten clinical genetics labs in the United States that share the most data with the research community, seven include ‘Caucasian’ as a multiple-choice category for patients’ racial or ethnic identity, despite the term having no scientific basis. Nearly 5,000 biomedical papers since 2010 have used ‘Caucasian’ to describe European populations. This suggests that too many scientists apply the term, either unbothered by or unaware of its roots in racist taxonomies used to justify slavery — or worse, adding to pseudoscientific claims of white biological superiority.

    I work at the intersection of statistics, evolutionary genomics and bioethics. Since 2017, I have co-led a diverse, multidisciplinary working group funded by the US National Institutes of Health to investigate diversity measures in clinical genetics and genomics (go.nature.com/3su2t8n).

    Many working in genomics do have a nuanced understanding of the issues and want to get things right. Still, I have been dismayed by how often the academics and clinicians I’ve encountered shy away from examining, or even acknowledging, how racism warps science. Decades of analyses have shown that ‘racial groups’ are defined by societies, not by genetics. Only the privileged have the luxury of opining that this is not a problem. As a white woman, I too have blind spots that need constant examination.

     

    This woman has a PhD in bioinformatics and heads an NIH funded lab on population genetics and just wrote this. Not only did she write it but it got published by Nature and not only that, Nature promoted it in their newsletter at the very top. If we take her at her word, how can her job or lab have any purpose?

    Caucasian is used in the US and to a lesser extent in Canada as a PC term for white, a somewhat polite term to remove some discomfort or emotion from race discussions, it's weird and it's history is tied up with things she'd consider 'racist' but that isn't it's use today and there is no way she believes otherwise. Caucasian is still used by these outfits because that's what on the US census, that's how police refer to white people and people understand it's meaning. It' seen as more professioanl and polite. How she as an upper-middle class white woman pretends it's actually a term which makes "claims of white biological superiority" says everything about the radicalisation and religious moment of America's upper middle class. And how it gets published in Nature says everything about how scientific journals are beginning to be infested with 'science communication' types.

    She then later complains that confounding of race an class is ignored as a factor in health disparities, as if people don't realise this and don't try to control for that when they can. And also complains like Steve about lumping Indians in with Chinese in the census while complaining that race doesn't exist. Which is it, is it wrong to categorise people at all or are we not categorising them finely enough?

    In essence it's a result of the fast pace of demographic change and rhetoric intensification, to many 'race doesn't exist' was the gold standard at attacking the core populations inclination to ingroup defense but now we've moved to the next phase of outgroup offense and it's racist not to recognise them and their group interests. Like many theologians before her, she simultaneously sees the contradictions but has internalised both as truth. But she also gets the impetus of her religion "white man bad" and uses both as vectors to attack her enemy in the same piece.

    Dr. Popejoy is described on her own Medium profile thusly:


    Public Health Geneticist working at the intersections of genomics and society. Parkour athlete. Social justice activist wielding science and knowledge for good.
     
    Her last two pieces on Medium was one bemoaning how few women do parkour. And how this must be a problem.
    https://medium.com/@alicebpopejoy

    It wasn't an army that defeated the West, it was the kid gloves others treated two or three generations of Lisa Simpons.

    Replies: @El Dato, @Captain Tripps, @Anonymous, @AndrewR, @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @Old Brown Fool

    ‘Caucasian’ dates from the time when the Europeans were thought to have appeared in the Caucasus mountains, and spread west to Europe and east to Persia and India. But as our recent studies show, White people appeared in Europe first and then spread to the east to Caucasus, and then again one migration came back into Europe. So, time to discard the term ‘Caucasian’. Replacing it with Europeans will be more P.C, but soon it will be even more P.C. to term them as “Old Europeans”, as against the New “Europeans” being imported now.

  221. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:

    When Kennedy was shot I had the feeling that what provoked Sirhan had been the then-new system of projecting the winners and “calling” the election on tv even before the polls close. The debate between Kennedy and McCarthy in the California primary was sensationally presented, the cool underdog McCarthy driving the Kennedy boosters nuts and Kennedy fighting back with the promise to send Israel 50 Phantom Jets right away. Israel had just smashed the Arabs in the 1967 war using French jets, and now France was embargoing Israel armaments. So, comes election night, and throughout the evening Walter Cronkite is screaming about a Kennedy landslide, over and over showing fabricated headlines like KENNEDY TRIUMPHS and CRUSHING KENNEDY VICTORY, and “projecting” with graphics like KENNEDY WINS 58 TO 36 PERCENT. Way off in fact, Kennedy just squeaking out a 46 to 42 win in California. They say Sirhan was stewing all evening in his room, watching the gloating CBS Kennedy bandwagaon on tv before heading off to the Ambassador hotel.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Anonymous


    When Kennedy was shot I had the feeling that what provoked Sirhan had been the then-new system of projecting the winners and “calling” the election on tv even before the polls close.
     
    You are overthinking this. What provoked Sirhan was the Jewish invasion of Palestine and America’s complicity.
  222. @Paul Jolliffe
    @Steve Sailer

    Actually, a number of witnesses did see a second gun in the hand of the guard immediately behind RFK, pointed up and adjacent to Kennedy’s right shoulder.
    Did he fire?
    We don’t know- the LAPD never tested his gun.
    Some investigation . . .

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Alden

    OK, but how would that absolve Sirhan? An extreme vase of felony murder.

    • Replies: @Paul Jolliffe
    @Steve Sailer

    Oh, under the letter of the law, whether Sirhan was a witting part of the conspiracy or not, because he participated in (whatever he thought he was a part of, even if he was hypnotized) he was guilty.

    On that Steve, we agree.

    However, there is no ballistic or forensic evidence that Sirhan fired the fatal shots and therefore either the official LAPD investigation was incredibly incompetent (impossible), or it was corrupted from the start, undoubtedly under the control of the CIA operatives in the SUS unit of the LAPD, just as RFK’s kids have asserted:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/amp/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

    , @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    Sirhan Sirhan was not charged with, tried for, nor convicted of felony murder-- any more than he was charged with, tried for, or convicted of attempted murder. Any such criminal charge has to be proved both as to the alleged criminal act itself (the so-called actus reus) and the actual mental state of the defendant at the time of the alleged criminal act (the so-called mens rea). There is strong evidence that Sirhan was acting under an hypnotic suggestion. Whether that would have been his own or someone else's suggestion is unknown.

    Replies: @TWS, @Steve Sailer

  223. @Anon
    @J.Ross


    We’re all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn’t be one solar cycle in one state and another in another.
     
    What did the Bible say about age of consent?

    Replies: @J.Ross

    You weren’t born together but you’ll die together. Oh, wait, that was the Three Kingdoms.

  224. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    "After all, 700 pounds of famous athletes immediately jumped on Sirhan, but nobody at the time noticed the Other Gunman who was only inches away from RFK?"

    ***

    What do eyewitnesses say? Kennedy was killed in a crowded room. Thus, there were many people in a position to explain what they saw, and, so they did, but as is often true in the case of eyewitnesses, they diverge.

    Multiple witnesses saw Thane Cesar pull out his gun, but only one accused him of firing it, which Cesar has denied over the years. The key witness cited by many believers of the second gunman theory is a man named Don Schulman, who was then a runner for KNXT-TV.

    He gave an interview at the scene to a local television reporter. “Well, I was standing directly behind him. I saw a man pull out a gun. It looked like he pulled it out of his pocket. He shot three times. I saw all three shots hit the senator. Then, I saw the senator fall and was picked up and carried away. I also saw the security men pull out their weapons. After that, it was very fuzzy. The next thing I knew, there were several shots fired. I saw a woman with blood come out of her temple… I saw the security police grab someone… the crowd was very panicky.”

    The site RFKProject says Schuman appears in this video at 2:42, confirming he was there that day. The police report on Schulman’s statement doesn’t mention the security guard angle.

    Schulman later grew more confident about what he says he saw when speaking to Ted Charach for a controversial documentary Charach made putting forth the second gunman theory. He said he was “following the senator….we were packed in there like sardines….another man stepped out and he shot. Just then the guard who was standing behind Kennedy, he took out his gun, and he fired also.” He said that Sirhan Sirhan was about 3 to 6 feet behind Kennedy, but that the guard was standing on the right hand side, directly and behind Kennedy. He said he told the story to several police authorities. He added, “The guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired.”

    Schulman also said, “A Caucasian gentleman stepped out and fired. The security guard hit Kennedy all three times. Kennedy slumped to the floor. The security guard fired back…” One Schulman statement was taken by a reporter named Jeff Brent. He later alleged to Charach, a researcher, “… a guard definitely pulled out his gun and fired… He wasn’t very far from Kennedy.” Again, Schulman’s account is unproven, other witnesses did not allege the same, and Cesar denies firing his gun, which he says was a different caliber from the .22 that took Kennedy’s life.

    ***

    https://heavy.com/news/2019/09/thane-eugene-cesar-rfk/

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe

    D.K., as undoubtedly know, Cesar did indeed own a . 22 on June 4, 1968. Further he later lied when he alleged that he had previously sold that .22.
    Proof came in the form of a receipt from a cash sale of that gun, a receipt in Cesar’s own handwriting.
    Finally, that gun was (remarkably) recovered from a lake in Arkansas in 2006, apparently too degraded to determine a ballistic match.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/amp/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

  225. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    OK, but how would that absolve Sirhan? An extreme vase of felony murder.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K.

    Oh, under the letter of the law, whether Sirhan was a witting part of the conspiracy or not, because he participated in (whatever he thought he was a part of, even if he was hypnotized) he was guilty.

    On that Steve, we agree.

    However, there is no ballistic or forensic evidence that Sirhan fired the fatal shots and therefore either the official LAPD investigation was incredibly incompetent (impossible), or it was corrupted from the start, undoubtedly under the control of the CIA operatives in the SUS unit of the LAPD, just as RFK’s kids have asserted:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/amp/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

  226. @Mr. Anon
    @David In TN


    I’ve run out of patience for those who peddle the stupid “conspiracy theories” about the JFK and RFK assassinations.
     
    I've run out of patience for those who unquestioningly believe the pronouncements of government of government-sanctioned white-wash panels and government officials who routinely lie to us.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    You’ve all had 56 years to delineate an alternative to the Warren Commission’s findings. And by that, I mean you start with the event itself and build your case concentrically. The best of the Warren Commission’s detractors would be Josiah Thompson and Cyril Wecht, because they actually engage in inductive reasoning. Their efforts to just call into question certain points (without building an alternative understanding) have not succeeded. Wecht speaks with the most authority because he’s a forensic pathologist, but his current argument centers on bullet trajectories (a subject on which he does not speak with authority).

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Art Deco

    Sure, I believe that mob-connected night-club manager, mafia bag-man, and gun-runner Jack Ruby was so broken up about poor Jackie having to sit through Oswald's trial that he shot him in the garage of the Dallas Police Department. He was just such a sensitive soul.

    I believe that a former director of the CIA who despised JFK because JFK had him canned was a good choice to sit on the panel investigating his death.

    I believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was a one-off assassin, despite the fact that he had a virtual doppelganger in another marine who espoused communism, defected to the Soviet Union, and then returned.

    I don't know what happened in Dallas on Nov. 22nd, 1963. Neither do you. You are just a smug, officious twit who thinks he knows everything. You don't, idiot.

  227. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    RFK Jr., upon the death of the security guard:

    ***

    Thane Eugene Cesar died today in the Philippines. Compelling evidence suggests that Cesar murdered my father. On June 5, 1968, Cesar, an employee in a classified section of Lockheed’s Burbank facility, was moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel. He had landed the job about one week earlier. Cesar waited in the pantry as my father spoke in the ballroom, then grabbed my father by the elbow and guided him toward Sirhan. With 77 people in the pantry, every eyewitness said Sirhan was always in front on my father at a 3-6 feet distance. Sirhan fired two shots toward my father before he was tackled. From under the dog pile, Sirhan emptied his 8 chamber revolver firing 6 more shots in the opposite direction 5 of them striking bystander and one going wild . By his own account, Cesar was directly behind my dad holding his right elbow with his own gun drawn when my dad fell backwards on top of him. Cesar repeatedly changed his story about exactly when he drew his weapon. According to the Coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, all 4 shots that struck my father were ‘contact’ shots fired from behind my dad with the barrel touching or nearly touching his body. Cesar sold his .22 to a co-worker weeks after the assassination warning him that it had been used in a crime. Cesar lied to police claiming that he’d disposed of the gun months before the assassination. Cesar was a bigot who hated the Kennedys for their advocacy of Civil Rights for blacks. I had plans to meet Thane Eugene Cesar in the Philippines last June until he demanded a payment of $25,000 through his agent Dan Moldea. Ironically, Moldea penned a meticulous and compelling indictment of Cesar in a 1995 book and then suddenly exculpated him by fiat in a bizarre and nonsensical final chapter. Police have never seriously investigated Cesar’s role in my father’s killing.

    ***

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman, @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    One of RFK Jr.’s interventions on a criminal case was to attempt to get a pair of his maternal-side cousins off the hook for murdering a young woman in Greenwich, Ct. whose name was Martha Moxley. In RFK Jr’s reading, the ‘evidence’ supposedly ‘implicated’ one Edward Littleton, one of two men harassed by the clueless Greenwich police department in 1975-76. Mr. Littleton was a schoolteacher hired by RFK Jr.’s uncle to tutor some of his children; he’d moved his gear into their home the day Miss Moxley was killed. Evidence against Mr. Littleton was nil. The Greenwich police hadn’t had a murder to investigate in 38 years, and could not or would not turn the case over to the state police. The two detectives on the case got the idea in their head that a juvenile could not have committed the crime, so ignored the late Miss Moxley’s social circle (including the last person with whom she’d been seen, Ethel Kennedy’s nephew Thos. Skakel). RFK Jr doesn’t rank high on the ‘good judgment’ or ‘integrity’ scales.

    • Agree: David In TN
    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    RFK Jr. is a trained attorney, with a much keener interest in who actually killed his father than, say, an autistic right-wing academic, writing pseudonymously on the Internet, with no known training or qualifications in any relevant field, perpetually vomiting up arcane statistics from LexisNexis, or wherever.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  228. @D. K.
    @Alden

    There are two exclusive possibilities about the unending exposition of conspiracy theories of the JFK assassination: to the extent that those theories can reasonably be said to be distinct from one another, either one of those conspiracy theories is essentially correct, while all of the other conspiracy theories are essentially incorrect, or else all of the conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect. Even if all of the conspiracy theories ever posited for the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect, however, that does not mean that the Warren Commission's official conclusion that Lee Oswald was essentially the proverbial "lone nut" assassin is correct. There are two other logical, if unlikely, possibilities: either another distinct conspiracy scenario, not yet hypothesized, was responsible for JFK's death, or else an additional assassin, independent and unaware of Lee Oswald's presence and intentions, fired the fatal head shot that killed President Kennedy.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    There aren’t any conspiracy theories. There has been a stew of speculation, but not testable models constructed by abstracting from known facts. (Other than David Lifton’s bad comedy). Assembling known data, you learn that Lee Harvey Oswald killed the President and wounded Gov. Connolly. Who were his collaborators or employers? If your hypothesis is that it was a conspiracy, that’s your first question to investigate.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald's killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not "known data." If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter's.

    https://www.allmystery.de/i/td9f720_Photo_naraevid_CE399-1.jpg

    Replies: @Art Deco

  229. @El Dato
    @Desiderius

    David French's deep thoughts a like the deep grooves of my bike tires: they collect random stuff that's not easy to look at.

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand? The basic configuration of "Who says what to whom apropos what and why" is sometimes entirely unscrutable. It's like an existentialist theatre piece written by Sartre in not his best moments.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius, @J.Ross

    What’s inscrutable about them?

    People need effective rejoinders to the French Davidians running the country into the ground. I linked to a good one. Who it is matters less than what is thought and said.

  230. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Desiderius

    It depends on what "smart" means. Doubtless, Soros is a brilliant speculator; on the other hand, his political machinations are evidently a product of a deranged mind.

    Better question is: why is he still around? How come all his NGOs & various misdeeds haven't been publicly unmasked and condemned?

    Replies: @Desiderius

    Is he brilliant? How brilliant did one have to be to profit from the Nahtzee despoilage of his own homeland? To short the pound while simultaneously crashing it? Many such cases.

    Doesn’t take brilliance if you’ve got no scruples and enough ill-gotten gains to leverage.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Desiderius

    Don't confuse brilliance with morality. Soros is a psycho, but very clever psycho re. financial machinations.

  231. @Art Deco
    @BB753

    Lots of scientists and engineers do not believe two planes could do what you believe they did.

    The list of the 'lots' begin and end with a professor in Fairbanks, Alaska who designs bridges, a retired professor from Clemson who designs dentures, and an electrochemist formerly at Brigham Young who was mixed up in the cold fusion circle.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Mr. Anon, @BB753

    I’ve never met an architect who could buy the official story either.

  232. @Dumbo
    @Pat Hannagan


    For example, George Soros actually is pretty smart, judging by his net worth, but even he feels compelled to stick with the catastrophic course he got himself on, even though he’s managing to ruin his reputation in his old age.
     
    At this point, I don't know anymore if it's disingenuity or cluelessness by Steve.

    "Ruin his reputation in old age"??
    When in Hell Soros had a "reputation" to ruin?
    In his youth when he was helping confiscate property from his fellow Jews?
    Or in 1992 when the shorted the British pound?

    And Steve does the same thing dismissing the "not so great reset" as just a silly idea by billionaires that for some reason are acting like bumbling morons who don't know what they were doing.

    Probably, Steve sucks up to rich and famous and smart, high-status people, because he wishes he was as rich and famous and smart and high-status as them; and so he tries to protect their "reputation".

    But to paint them as dumb morons who somehow don't know what they are doing, or that they are engaging in evil stuff "by accident" or "by mistake", is just embarrassing.

    Replies: @BB753, @Pat Hannagan

    Preach it, mate.

    It’s a fascinating aspect about Sailer, who is otherwise a first rate intellect.

    Yet, of all the 2nd rate HBD intellects at Unz, Sailer remains two standard deviations above.

  233. @Paleo Liberal
    A few decades ago I read a book which claimed there was a massive conspiracy to kill MLK, and that there was never a fair trial.

    I read the book because the Forward was written by Jesse Jackson, who reported the King family favored a retrial and investigation. Recall Jackson next to King during the assassination.

    Here is where it gets weird. One of the points used to convince Jackson and the Kings was a file of hotel records. It seems there were some FBI agents who checked in and out of hotels in Memphis around the time of the assassination. Then the author showed the same names from hotel records in Dallas at the time of JFK’s assassination.

    It could be that the FBI was following around both JFK and MLK. Or, …

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Art Deco, @J.Ross, @kaganovitch, @Gamecock

    In any case, it was interesting to see a conspiracy theory tying the assassinations of JFK and MLK together.

    Seems hoky to me.

    BUT, I can offer a somewhat plausible theory linking the assassinations of JFK and RFK.

    A prime candidate for who was behind the murder of JFK is Santo Trafficante, Jr. Indeed, I have no doubt it was him. So why was the mob after JFK? The big theory is that Kennedy messed up getting Castro kicked out in Cuba. The mafia wanted their casinos in Havana back.

    BWTM: The mob supported Kennedy, expecting him to take it easy on them. But his damn little brother, as Attorney General, came after them hard.

    Years later, the mob still didn’t like Bobby, and sure as heck didn’t want him to be President. Winning the California primary signed Bobby’s death certificate.

  234. @Buzz Mohawk

    ... (assassination conspiracy theorizing was a leftwing phenomenon a half century ago, although the curious MLK murder for some reason never got much traction).
     
    The key is "leftwing." The MLK murder didn't get traction because the suspect was a White boy who was neither a communist nor a brown terrorist.

    Steve correctly implies here that the real reason for the conspiracy-hypothesizing-efforts at exoneration is because the obvious villains are favorite children of the left.

    But I always found RFK conspiracy theorizing boring compared to JFK, the gold standard of conspiracy theories.
     
    Case in point: Oswald is obviously guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but he too was a communist and a midwit with a shallow understanding of Marxism. Thus he must be defended at all costs.

    The truth is, JFK was murdered by what Jackie Kennedy called "a silly little communist."

    If Jack Rubenstein hadn't offed him, Oswald himself might also be up for parole and supported by Soros's demons now.

    BTW, Steve, thank you for promoting Occam's Razor in your blog. It is one of the best tools for cutting through crap like this.

    Replies: @Gamecock

    If Jack Rubenstein hadn’t offed him, Oswald himself might also be up for parole and supported by Soros’s demons now.

    Ruby was an associate of Santo Trafficante, Jr.

  235. @J.Ross
    @Paleo Liberal

    Problem: why would a wet team check in under their proper names? Did they also register their gun serial numbers?
    The strongest negative case is that the guy who is supposed to have done it should not have been able to -- he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I'm not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Art Deco

    he had just gotten out of prison on the other side of the country and had no money. I’m not sure that you can make a positive case, even if the Kings were sold, and definitely not with hotel records.

    He escaped from the Missouri State Penitentiary in April 1967. It’s about a 6.5 hour drive from the Lorraine Motel. His attorney, Percy Foreman, asked later said he’d grilled his client for hours and hours on his travels and his expenditures (“down to the last two bits for a shave and a haircut”) and concluded his travels could have been financed by his accumulated savings.

  236. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    One of RFK Jr.'s interventions on a criminal case was to attempt to get a pair of his maternal-side cousins off the hook for murdering a young woman in Greenwich, Ct. whose name was Martha Moxley. In RFK Jr's reading, the 'evidence' supposedly 'implicated' one Edward Littleton, one of two men harassed by the clueless Greenwich police department in 1975-76. Mr. Littleton was a schoolteacher hired by RFK Jr.'s uncle to tutor some of his children; he'd moved his gear into their home the day Miss Moxley was killed. Evidence against Mr. Littleton was nil. The Greenwich police hadn't had a murder to investigate in 38 years, and could not or would not turn the case over to the state police. The two detectives on the case got the idea in their head that a juvenile could not have committed the crime, so ignored the late Miss Moxley's social circle (including the last person with whom she'd been seen, Ethel Kennedy's nephew Thos. Skakel). RFK Jr doesn't rank high on the 'good judgment' or 'integrity' scales.

    Replies: @D. K.

    RFK Jr. is a trained attorney, with a much keener interest in who actually killed his father than, say, an autistic right-wing academic, writing pseudonymously on the Internet, with no known training or qualifications in any relevant field, perpetually vomiting up arcane statistics from LexisNexis, or wherever.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD'd on heroin during an airline flight.

    Replies: @D. K., @David In TN

  237. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    There aren't any conspiracy theories. There has been a stew of speculation, but not testable models constructed by abstracting from known facts. (Other than David Lifton's bad comedy). Assembling known data, you learn that Lee Harvey Oswald killed the President and wounded Gov. Connolly. Who were his collaborators or employers? If your hypothesis is that it was a conspiracy, that's your first question to investigate.

    Replies: @D. K.

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald’s killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not “known data.” If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter’s.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald’s killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not “known data.” If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter’s.

    Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn't, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant.

    Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It's his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President's left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that's been discredited several times over.

    Replies: @D. K.

  238. @Steve Sailer
    @Paul Jolliffe

    OK, but how would that absolve Sirhan? An extreme vase of felony murder.

    Replies: @Paul Jolliffe, @D. K.

    Sirhan Sirhan was not charged with, tried for, nor convicted of felony murder– any more than he was charged with, tried for, or convicted of attempted murder. Any such criminal charge has to be proved both as to the alleged criminal act itself (the so-called actus reus) and the actual mental state of the defendant at the time of the alleged criminal act (the so-called mens rea). There is strong evidence that Sirhan was acting under an hypnotic suggestion. Whether that would have been his own or someone else’s suggestion is unknown.

    • Replies: @TWS
    @D. K.

    Probably electro-magnetic rays. Or maybe goofa dust. Maybe it was a Changeling or a fetch. The Nazis still had that base in Antarctica, maybe they hypnotized him.

    , @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    The idea that Sirhan Sirhan was a hypnotized automaton killing machine, like Reggie Jackson coming out of the outfield to try to kill the Queen of England at the baseball game in "The Naked Gun" is an implausible Fun idea. The idea that the security guard accidentally killed RFK while trying to do his job and protect him from Sirhan's gunfire is a not implausible but Not Fun idea.

    Not surprisingly, the two ideas don't jibe. It would be like if "The Manchurian Candidate" ends with some random extra accidentally shooting the nominee.

    Replies: @D. K.

  239. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    RFK Jr. is a trained attorney, with a much keener interest in who actually killed his father than, say, an autistic right-wing academic, writing pseudonymously on the Internet, with no known training or qualifications in any relevant field, perpetually vomiting up arcane statistics from LexisNexis, or wherever.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD’d on heroin during an airline flight.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD’d on heroin during an airline flight."

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    That salacious fact from thirty-eight years ago is relevant and material to the discussion, now, exactly how, Rainman?

    Replies: @Art Deco

    , @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    RFK Jr. got a job in the Manhattan DAs office after law school. While there, he became incoherent when in the courtroom, going uptown to score drugs may have had something to do with it.

    He then OD'd during an airline flight. Even Morgenthau wouldn't keep him on after that.

    Replies: @D. K.

  240. @Wilkey
    @Alden


    One of the sex scandals involved a 15 year old baby sitter who got pregnant and had an illegal abortion. Of course most of the MEN OF UNZ believe it’s perfectly acceptable and should be legal for a grown man to get a 15 year old pregnant.
     
    I recently had a conversation with a 39-year-old woman who told me that she was maybe thinking about maybe having children. But it would probably mean she'd have to change careers.

    As a general rule I don't think 15 y.o. girls getting pregnant is a great idea. When I consider how far towards crazy we've gone in the opposite direction, however, I don't think it's the worst thing that can happen, by any means. I've had several friends who were either born to ~16 y.o. mothers or had children of their own at roughly that age. They and their children are all doing well.

    I know for a fact I would rather have my own daughters become teenage mothers than hit 40 childless, talking as if their dogs are their children, and still pretending like it might happen for them.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753

    If not for teenage pregnancy in the Paleolithic, we wouldn’t be here as a species.

  241. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald's killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not "known data." If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter's.

    https://www.allmystery.de/i/td9f720_Photo_naraevid_CE399-1.jpg

    Replies: @Art Deco

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald’s killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not “known data.” If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter’s.

    Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn’t, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant.

    Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It’s his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President’s left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that’s been discredited several times over.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn’t, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant."

    Your repeating of your claim, Rainman, does not make it any more true than it was the last time that you claimed it. Being autistic, as you are, do feel free, however, to provide us civilians with LexisNexis' exhaustive "inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant." Regardless, if Oswald were "an assailant" in the JFK assassination-- despite a paraffin result to the contrary-- that would not mean that he was "the assailant"-- i.e., the "lone nut" who blew JFK's brains out in public.

    "Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It’s his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President’s left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that’s been discredited several times over."

    As you are well aware, Rainman, Governor Connally insisted, from his first post-assassination press conference until his dying day, that he was not hit with the same bullet as JFK, prior to the latter's fatal head wound. The claim that Connally not only was mistaken, but that his body had a "delayed reaction" to his being wounded in multiple body locations-- including having his wrist shattered!-- is utterly ridiculous. Contrary to the dishonest claim of you "single-bullet theor[ists]," JFK was shot in the back, nearly six inches below the top of his shirt collar, and nearly four inches below the bottom of his shirt collar-- not at the base of his neck, as falsely illustrated by the Warren Commission to support Arlen Specter's nonsense!

    https://jfkindex.com/photos/SRexhibit59.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.vidiars.com/jfkwatergate/ShirtBackwRuler.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.thinktruth.com/images/BulletAutopsy1.jpg

    vs.

    https://i0.wp.com/jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JFK-Illustration-1.png?fit=717%2C324

    During his autopsy, JFK's back wound was probed, both digitally and with a metal probe, by both Dr. Humes, who performed the autopsy, and one of the other doctors present in the crowded room. They found that the wound created a hole that was only about one and a half to two inches deep-- possibly as a result of Kennedy's back-brace. If CE 399 [supra] is a genuine bullet from the JFK assassination, rather than a bullet that was planted at the hospital, as some others claim, than it is obvious to me that CE 399 is the bullet that had entered JFK's back, but then been dislodged onto his stretcher, only later to be knocked to the floor of Parkland Hospital, as I already have described.

    Dr. Wecht's nemesis, Dr. Micheal Baden, is on tape-- overlooking the facts that I already have cited-- claiming that Kennedy's back wound and the wound in his neck-- which the Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses all assumed to be an entry wound, because of its small size-- would line up perfectly, if we just assumed that JFK was bending forward, say, eighty-some degrees (Baden does so in the video), albeit for no conceivable reason, during the brief interlude in the Zapruder film during which the President is hidden from view behind the street sign! Unfortunately for Dr. Baden, there is no photographic nor other known evidence supporting his ludicrous hypothesis.

    As for the police-radio recordings, long after you had read in . . . Was it "Hustler" that published your drummer friend's supposed debunking, Rainman? . . . that the anomalous sounds recorded on a motorcycle policeman's open microphone could not possibly have been gunshots, the debate among more open-minded observers continued:

    https://jfkfacts.org/is-there-an-audio-recording-of-the-jfk-assassination/

    Guess what, Rainman? Dr. Thompson is still alive-- and your pseudonymous Internet comments from the faculty lounge have yet to suppress his newly refined theory of President Kennedy's assassination!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_Thompson#Last_Second_in_Dallas_(2021)

    https://www.amazon.com/Last-Second-Dallas-Josiah-Thompson/dp/0700630082

    You better get your beloved Big Tech oligarchs on the case, stat!

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Alden

  242. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD'd on heroin during an airline flight.

    Replies: @D. K., @David In TN

    “He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD’d on heroin during an airline flight.”

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years’ probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    That salacious fact from thirty-eight years ago is relevant and material to the discussion, now, exactly how, Rainman?

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    You were the one who brought up the 'trained attorney' mess. I pointed out to you the reason he's not practicing law and what he''s said about another case in which he is 'interested' in the outcome. There's more where that came from. Guy's a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones.

    Replies: @D. K., @Hibernian

  243. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD’d on heroin during an airline flight."

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    That salacious fact from thirty-eight years ago is relevant and material to the discussion, now, exactly how, Rainman?

    Replies: @Art Deco

    You were the one who brought up the ‘trained attorney’ mess. I pointed out to you the reason he’s not practicing law and what he”s said about another case in which he is ‘interested’ in the outcome. There’s more where that came from. Guy’s a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "You were the one who brought up the ‘trained attorney’ mess. I pointed out to you the reason he’s not practicing law and what he”s said about another case in which he is ‘interested’ in the outcome. There’s more where that came from. Guy’s a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones."

    You are either an idiot savant, rather than an autistic savant, or else just a shameless liar:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    As for additional indicia of his native intelligence . . .

    ***

    Kennedy continued his education at Harvard and the London School of Economics, graduating from Harvard College in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts in American History and Literature. He went on to earn a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia and a Master of Laws from Pace University.[12]

    ***

    What are your earned degrees, and where did you earn them, Professor?

    Regardless, your inability to distinguish between the Moxley murder case, where RFK Jr. supports his cousin's innocence-- and which would have been an unconstitutional miscarriage of justice, even if his cousin were guilty!-- and the RFK assassination, for which the son would like to have the actual killer of his own father properly identified, tells me all that I really would need to know about your own native intelligence, even if I had not been suffering through your obnoxious comment history, here at The Unz Review, for lo these many years. "Kennedy Derangement Theory" was a thing, albeit unnamed, long before Donald Trump ever rode his golden escalator down to his first campaign press conference; the earlier malady merely is not limited to an individual target, nor even to a single generation of that singular American family.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @Hibernian
    @Art Deco

    I think he was a professor at Pace University Law School (not exactly another Harvard) not that many years ago. (He started there four years after the heroin incident.) He's had a long career practicing law. (Just stating a fact; I have no use for any Kennedy.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.

  244. Anon[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    When Kennedy was shot I had the feeling that what provoked Sirhan had been the then-new system of projecting the winners and "calling" the election on tv even before the polls close. The debate between Kennedy and McCarthy in the California primary was sensationally presented, the cool underdog McCarthy driving the Kennedy boosters nuts and Kennedy fighting back with the promise to send Israel 50 Phantom Jets right away. Israel had just smashed the Arabs in the 1967 war using French jets, and now France was embargoing Israel armaments. So, comes election night, and throughout the evening Walter Cronkite is screaming about a Kennedy landslide, over and over showing fabricated headlines like KENNEDY TRIUMPHS and CRUSHING KENNEDY VICTORY, and "projecting" with graphics like KENNEDY WINS 58 TO 36 PERCENT. Way off in fact, Kennedy just squeaking out a 46 to 42 win in California. They say Sirhan was stewing all evening in his room, watching the gloating CBS Kennedy bandwagaon on tv before heading off to the Ambassador hotel.

    Replies: @Anon

    When Kennedy was shot I had the feeling that what provoked Sirhan had been the then-new system of projecting the winners and “calling” the election on tv even before the polls close.

    You are overthinking this. What provoked Sirhan was the Jewish invasion of Palestine and America’s complicity.

    • Agree: Alden
  245. @El Dato
    @Desiderius

    David French's deep thoughts a like the deep grooves of my bike tires: they collect random stuff that's not easy to look at.

    That being said. does anyone think that these twitter back-and-forths are hard to understand? The basic configuration of "Who says what to whom apropos what and why" is sometimes entirely unscrutable. It's like an existentialist theatre piece written by Sartre in not his best moments.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius, @J.Ross

    Agree, I hate how Twitter deliberately puts it out of order. There is no reason why it shouldn’t have the same order as normal prose.

  246. @J.Ross
    @Wilkey

    We're all stupid for forgetting the Bible. The standard shouldn't be one solar cycle in one state and another in another. It should be, once you have her, will you hold the vomit bowl when she's sick? You can have any chick you want, but you're stuck with her, for life. We are currently unworthy of this superior policy.

    Replies: @Anon, @TWS

    How did Alden miss this comment. I expected an epistle about THE MEN OF UNZ since yesterday.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @TWS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mE0qw-4WNg

  247. @clifford brown
    @Reg Cæsar

    The point is that Sirhan Sirhan was not a "jihadist", but likely a Palestinian patsy set up by the same people that killed JFK.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Steve Sailer, @TWS

    So when Rosie Grier tackled him, someone stuck the gun in his hand and pulled the trigger a few times for good measure.

    Makes me kind of sad. I always admired Rosie.

  248. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    No, Rainman, Lee Oswald’s killing of President Kennedy with a shot to the head is not “known data.” If you want a theory to toy with in the faculty lounge, try Arlen Specter’s.

    Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn't, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant.

    Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It's his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President's left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that's been discredited several times over.

    Replies: @D. K.

    “Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn’t, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant.”

    Your repeating of your claim, Rainman, does not make it any more true than it was the last time that you claimed it. Being autistic, as you are, do feel free, however, to provide us civilians with LexisNexis’ exhaustive “inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant.” Regardless, if Oswald were “an assailant” in the JFK assassination– despite a paraffin result to the contrary– that would not mean that he was “the assailant”– i.e., the “lone nut” who blew JFK’s brains out in public.

    “Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It’s his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President’s left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that’s been discredited several times over.”

    As you are well aware, Rainman, Governor Connally insisted, from his first post-assassination press conference until his dying day, that he was not hit with the same bullet as JFK, prior to the latter’s fatal head wound. The claim that Connally not only was mistaken, but that his body had a “delayed reaction” to his being wounded in multiple body locations– including having his wrist shattered!– is utterly ridiculous. Contrary to the dishonest claim of you “single-bullet theor[ists],” JFK was shot in the back, nearly six inches below the top of his shirt collar, and nearly four inches below the bottom of his shirt collar– not at the base of his neck, as falsely illustrated by the Warren Commission to support Arlen Specter’s nonsense!

    . . . and . . .

    . . . and . . .

    vs.

    https://i0.wp.com/jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JFK-Illustration-1.png?fit=717%2C324

    During his autopsy, JFK’s back wound was probed, both digitally and with a metal probe, by both Dr. Humes, who performed the autopsy, and one of the other doctors present in the crowded room. They found that the wound created a hole that was only about one and a half to two inches deep– possibly as a result of Kennedy’s back-brace. If CE 399 [supra] is a genuine bullet from the JFK assassination, rather than a bullet that was planted at the hospital, as some others claim, than it is obvious to me that CE 399 is the bullet that had entered JFK’s back, but then been dislodged onto his stretcher, only later to be knocked to the floor of Parkland Hospital, as I already have described.

    Dr. Wecht’s nemesis, Dr. Micheal Baden, is on tape– overlooking the facts that I already have cited– claiming that Kennedy’s back wound and the wound in his neck– which the Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses all assumed to be an entry wound, because of its small size– would line up perfectly, if we just assumed that JFK was bending forward, say, eighty-some degrees (Baden does so in the video), albeit for no conceivable reason, during the brief interlude in the Zapruder film during which the President is hidden from view behind the street sign! Unfortunately for Dr. Baden, there is no photographic nor other known evidence supporting his ludicrous hypothesis.

    As for the police-radio recordings, long after you had read in . . . Was it “Hustler” that published your drummer friend’s supposed debunking, Rainman? . . . that the anomalous sounds recorded on a motorcycle policeman’s open microphone could not possibly have been gunshots, the debate among more open-minded observers continued:

    https://jfkfacts.org/is-there-an-audio-recording-of-the-jfk-assassination/

    Guess what, Rainman? Dr. Thompson is still alive– and your pseudonymous Internet comments from the faculty lounge have yet to suppress his newly refined theory of President Kennedy’s assassination!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_Thompson#Last_Second_in_Dallas_(2021)

    You better get your beloved Big Tech oligarchs on the case, stat!

    • LOL: Alden
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck.

    As for the Governor, one's memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame.

    Replies: @David In TN, @D. K.

    , @Alden
    @D. K.

    Isn’t it Dr Michael Baden who claims Jeff Epstein hanged himself by kneeling on the floor and leaning into the noose he fashioned from paper bedsheets?

    Derek, the unknown Kennedy. And family hagiographer.

    Replies: @D. K.

  249. @Abolish_public_education
    @anon

    I’m not sure what you’re trying to say about CA pot.

    Dispensaries sell it (with a Rx?). Heads are permitted to grow a few plants
    for themselves. Many grow it for a living. I don’t think they prosecute users caught with small amounts.

    I remember reading recently about a pot farmer who shot trespassers. As pot is still a big, cash crop indicates that it hasn’t been truly legalized, e.g. sold at the grocery store checkout line.

    Nobody ever holds up Safeway and demands smokes.

    Oh, and abolish sin taxes.

    Replies: @TWS

    Nope. Sin taxes work perfectly if properly balanced. Too high and you get too much bootlegging and illegal production. Too low and you get over indulgence and the problems associated with that.

  250. @WaffleStaffel
    Sirhan Sirhan? You've got to be joking.

    We are free to believe the official version, and we are free to believe the conspiracy versions, but seldom do we consider, or are presented with, the third, often most basic and obvious option.

    Kennedy didn't die. http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf
    Neither did Bobby.

    It's sort of like all the people who say "Epstein didn't kill himself." Rarely, if ever, do you hear "Epstein didn't die." This, despite the drone footage spotting him safely back on his island after his "death."

    Kennedy was also in all likelihood gay. http://mileswmathis.com/jfkgay.pdf

    Replies: @TWS

    Funniest Unz comment in months. Makes The Duck larper look lame.

    • Replies: @WaffleStaffel
    @TWS

    Do you have anything substantive to add, or are you just trying to display how clever you think you are?

  251. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    Sirhan Sirhan was not charged with, tried for, nor convicted of felony murder-- any more than he was charged with, tried for, or convicted of attempted murder. Any such criminal charge has to be proved both as to the alleged criminal act itself (the so-called actus reus) and the actual mental state of the defendant at the time of the alleged criminal act (the so-called mens rea). There is strong evidence that Sirhan was acting under an hypnotic suggestion. Whether that would have been his own or someone else's suggestion is unknown.

    Replies: @TWS, @Steve Sailer

    Probably electro-magnetic rays. Or maybe goofa dust. Maybe it was a Changeling or a fetch. The Nazis still had that base in Antarctica, maybe they hypnotized him.

  252. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    You were the one who brought up the 'trained attorney' mess. I pointed out to you the reason he's not practicing law and what he''s said about another case in which he is 'interested' in the outcome. There's more where that came from. Guy's a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones.

    Replies: @D. K., @Hibernian

    “You were the one who brought up the ‘trained attorney’ mess. I pointed out to you the reason he’s not practicing law and what he”s said about another case in which he is ‘interested’ in the outcome. There’s more where that came from. Guy’s a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones.”

    You are either an idiot savant, rather than an autistic savant, or else just a shameless liar:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years’ probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    As for additional indicia of his native intelligence . . .

    ***

    Kennedy continued his education at Harvard and the London School of Economics, graduating from Harvard College in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts in American History and Literature. He went on to earn a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia and a Master of Laws from Pace University.[12]

    ***

    What are your earned degrees, and where did you earn them, Professor?

    Regardless, your inability to distinguish between the Moxley murder case, where RFK Jr. supports his cousin’s innocence– and which would have been an unconstitutional miscarriage of justice, even if his cousin were guilty!– and the RFK assassination, for which the son would like to have the actual killer of his own father properly identified, tells me all that I really would need to know about your own native intelligence, even if I had not been suffering through your obnoxious comment history, here at The Unz Review, for lo these many years. “Kennedy Derangement Theory” was a thing, albeit unnamed, long before Donald Trump ever rode his golden escalator down to his first campaign press conference; the earlier malady merely is not limited to an individual target, nor even to a single generation of that singular American family.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @D. K.

    ERRATUM: "Kennedy Derangement Syndrome" (obviously), not "Kennedy Derangement Theory."

    "Mea culpa!"

  253. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "You were the one who brought up the ‘trained attorney’ mess. I pointed out to you the reason he’s not practicing law and what he”s said about another case in which he is ‘interested’ in the outcome. There’s more where that came from. Guy’s a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones."

    You are either an idiot savant, rather than an autistic savant, or else just a shameless liar:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    As for additional indicia of his native intelligence . . .

    ***

    Kennedy continued his education at Harvard and the London School of Economics, graduating from Harvard College in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts in American History and Literature. He went on to earn a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia and a Master of Laws from Pace University.[12]

    ***

    What are your earned degrees, and where did you earn them, Professor?

    Regardless, your inability to distinguish between the Moxley murder case, where RFK Jr. supports his cousin's innocence-- and which would have been an unconstitutional miscarriage of justice, even if his cousin were guilty!-- and the RFK assassination, for which the son would like to have the actual killer of his own father properly identified, tells me all that I really would need to know about your own native intelligence, even if I had not been suffering through your obnoxious comment history, here at The Unz Review, for lo these many years. "Kennedy Derangement Theory" was a thing, albeit unnamed, long before Donald Trump ever rode his golden escalator down to his first campaign press conference; the earlier malady merely is not limited to an individual target, nor even to a single generation of that singular American family.

    Replies: @D. K.

    ERRATUM: “Kennedy Derangement Syndrome” (obviously), not “Kennedy Derangement Theory.”

    “Mea culpa!”

  254. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    He was a prosecutor at one time. He resigned his position when he OD'd on heroin during an airline flight.

    Replies: @D. K., @David In TN

    RFK Jr. got a job in the Manhattan DAs office after law school. While there, he became incoherent when in the courtroom, going uptown to score drugs may have had something to do with it.

    He then OD’d during an airline flight. Even Morgenthau wouldn’t keep him on after that.

    • Thanks: Alden
    • Replies: @D. K.
    @David In TN

    How many such drug episodes has RFK Jr. had since he completed drug rehabilitation, thirty-eight years ago, David?

    To repeat:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    Feel welcome to read the rest of the long section about RFK Jr.'s long legal career at . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    Replies: @Hibernian, @David In TN, @Alden

  255. @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    RFK Jr. got a job in the Manhattan DAs office after law school. While there, he became incoherent when in the courtroom, going uptown to score drugs may have had something to do with it.

    He then OD'd during an airline flight. Even Morgenthau wouldn't keep him on after that.

    Replies: @D. K.

    How many such drug episodes has RFK Jr. had since he completed drug rehabilitation, thirty-eight years ago, David?

    To repeat:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years’ probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    Feel welcome to read the rest of the long section about RFK Jr.’s long legal career at . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    Tell me that incident wouldn't have ended the legal career of a John Doe Esq. of poor or even middle class origins and no connections.

    Replies: @D. K.

    , @David In TN
    @D. K.

    Question: How many of Bobby Jr.'s wives have hanged themselves? Answer: One.

    , @Alden
    @D. K.

    Robert Jr has been a government and NGO parasite his entire life. Fired from a County prosecutors for inability to preform his job. Then on and on to various bogus non profits. Surprised he didn’t get into Pitbull Rescue non profits. One of them in Utah pulls in 55 million a year. Best thing about rescuing pit bulls they can’t snitch to the press about what’s really going on.

    Replies: @D. K.

  256. @Paul Jolliffe
    @Steve Sailer

    Actually, a number of witnesses did see a second gun in the hand of the guard immediately behind RFK, pointed up and adjacent to Kennedy’s right shoulder.
    Did he fire?
    We don’t know- the LAPD never tested his gun.
    Some investigation . . .

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Alden

    Appalling shocking news!!!!! !!!!!!!! Security guards carry guns and when an assassin pulls a gun in the same room the protectee is in the security guard does what is required in his job description. Pulls out his own gun.

    The MEN OF UNZ the MEN OF UNZ , no common sense , so incredibly naive and ignorant. In this case ignorant of what security guards do.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Appalling shocking news!!!!! !!!!!!!! Security guards carry guns and when an assassin pulls a gun in the same room the protectee is in the security guard does what is required in his job description. Pulls out his own gun."

    His company-issued weapon, for his new job as a security guard, was a .38-caliber handgun. His personal weapon was a .22-caliber handgun, as was Sirhan's handgun. Along with claiming that he never fired the weapon that eyewitnesses saw him draw, during the shooting, the security guard claimed that he was using his company-issued .38, not his personal .22, that night. As noted by Mr. Jolliffe, above:

    "Further he later lied when he alleged that he had previously sold that .22.
    Proof came in the form of a receipt from a cash sale of that gun, a receipt in Cesar’s own handwriting.
    Finally, that gun was (remarkably) recovered from a lake in Arkansas in 2006, apparently too degraded to determine a ballistic match."

    The bullet fragments from the fatal head shot were never tested either-- i.e., they were never matched to any weapon, including Sirhan's handgun.

  257. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn’t, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant."

    Your repeating of your claim, Rainman, does not make it any more true than it was the last time that you claimed it. Being autistic, as you are, do feel free, however, to provide us civilians with LexisNexis' exhaustive "inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant." Regardless, if Oswald were "an assailant" in the JFK assassination-- despite a paraffin result to the contrary-- that would not mean that he was "the assailant"-- i.e., the "lone nut" who blew JFK's brains out in public.

    "Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It’s his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President’s left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that’s been discredited several times over."

    As you are well aware, Rainman, Governor Connally insisted, from his first post-assassination press conference until his dying day, that he was not hit with the same bullet as JFK, prior to the latter's fatal head wound. The claim that Connally not only was mistaken, but that his body had a "delayed reaction" to his being wounded in multiple body locations-- including having his wrist shattered!-- is utterly ridiculous. Contrary to the dishonest claim of you "single-bullet theor[ists]," JFK was shot in the back, nearly six inches below the top of his shirt collar, and nearly four inches below the bottom of his shirt collar-- not at the base of his neck, as falsely illustrated by the Warren Commission to support Arlen Specter's nonsense!

    https://jfkindex.com/photos/SRexhibit59.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.vidiars.com/jfkwatergate/ShirtBackwRuler.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.thinktruth.com/images/BulletAutopsy1.jpg

    vs.

    https://i0.wp.com/jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JFK-Illustration-1.png?fit=717%2C324

    During his autopsy, JFK's back wound was probed, both digitally and with a metal probe, by both Dr. Humes, who performed the autopsy, and one of the other doctors present in the crowded room. They found that the wound created a hole that was only about one and a half to two inches deep-- possibly as a result of Kennedy's back-brace. If CE 399 [supra] is a genuine bullet from the JFK assassination, rather than a bullet that was planted at the hospital, as some others claim, than it is obvious to me that CE 399 is the bullet that had entered JFK's back, but then been dislodged onto his stretcher, only later to be knocked to the floor of Parkland Hospital, as I already have described.

    Dr. Wecht's nemesis, Dr. Micheal Baden, is on tape-- overlooking the facts that I already have cited-- claiming that Kennedy's back wound and the wound in his neck-- which the Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses all assumed to be an entry wound, because of its small size-- would line up perfectly, if we just assumed that JFK was bending forward, say, eighty-some degrees (Baden does so in the video), albeit for no conceivable reason, during the brief interlude in the Zapruder film during which the President is hidden from view behind the street sign! Unfortunately for Dr. Baden, there is no photographic nor other known evidence supporting his ludicrous hypothesis.

    As for the police-radio recordings, long after you had read in . . . Was it "Hustler" that published your drummer friend's supposed debunking, Rainman? . . . that the anomalous sounds recorded on a motorcycle policeman's open microphone could not possibly have been gunshots, the debate among more open-minded observers continued:

    https://jfkfacts.org/is-there-an-audio-recording-of-the-jfk-assassination/

    Guess what, Rainman? Dr. Thompson is still alive-- and your pseudonymous Internet comments from the faculty lounge have yet to suppress his newly refined theory of President Kennedy's assassination!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_Thompson#Last_Second_in_Dallas_(2021)

    https://www.amazon.com/Last-Second-Dallas-Josiah-Thompson/dp/0700630082

    You better get your beloved Big Tech oligarchs on the case, stat!

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Alden

    Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck.

    As for the Governor, one’s memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame.

    • Thanks: Alden
    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    Arguing with these cretins is like teaching history to a rock.

    The Kennedy worshippers have never accepted Oswald and Sirhan as the assassins, i.e. "It had to be a silly little Communist."

    , @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck."

    I already have mentioned what happened to the bullet that hit President Kennedy in the upper back-- not in his lower neck!-- and that CE 399 [supra], if it is genuine, is undoubtedly the bullet that entered his back, only to fall out at Parkland Hospital-- not the bullet that then wounded Governor Connally in multiple locations, including shattering the wrist of the hand that was holding his Stetson, winding up in his leg. I also have mentioned already that all of the doctors and nurses at Parkland Hospital had assumed that the wound in the front of Kennedy's neck was an entry wound, because of its small size. Here is an old letter to Newsweek, from someone with expertise on both such wounds, in general, and the JFK assassination and autopsy, in particular:

    ***

    (2) Robert B. Livingston, letter to Maynard Parker, editor of Newsweek (10th September, 1993)

    I was Scientific Director of the National Institute for Mental Health and (concurrently) of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, at the time of the assassination. These two institutes are obviously relevant to interpretations of brain damage sustained by the president.

    On the basis of November 22, 1963, broadcasts from Parkland Hospital, I felt obliged to call Commander James Humes, at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, who was about to perform the autopsy. Our telephone conversation was completed before the body arrived at Andrews AFB. I called to retail media reports from Parkland Hospital that there was a small wound in the front of his neck, just to the right of the trachea.

    Humes said he hadn't been paying attention to the news, but was receptive to what I had to tell him. We had a cordial conversation about this. Based on my knowledge of medical and experimental analyses of bullet wounding, and personal experiences caring for numerous bullet and shrapnel wounds throughout the battle of Okinawa, I told him that a small wound, as described, would have to be a wound of entry. When a bullet exits from flesh, it violently blows out a lot of tissue, usually making a conspicuous cruciate opening with tissue protruding. A wound of entry, however, just punctures as it penetrates. So I stressed the need for him to probe that wound to trace its course fully and to find the location of the bullet or fragments. I especially emphasized that such a wound had to be an entry wound. And since the president was facing forward the whole time, that meant that there had to be a conspiracy. As we talked about that, he interrupted the conversation momentarily. He came back on the line to say, "I'm sorry. Dr. Livingston, but the FBI won't let me talk any longer." Thus, the conversation ended.

    Two important subsequent events are noteworthy: Commander Humes did not dissect that wound, and when asked why not, in the Warren Commission hearings, he said that he didn't know about the small wound in the neck until the following day when he had a conversation with Dr. Perry at Parkland Hospital.

    A further issue concerns reports of the appearance of cerebellar tissue in the occipital wound. This was first reported "live" as observations by an orderly, and by a nurse, both of whom were in the surgery where attempts to resuscitate the president were conducted prior to his death. I didn't give any credibility to those stories and dismissed them from my focus at the time, attributing what I thought must be mistaken identification of cerebellum to a likely lack of familiarity with neuroanatomy by two non-medically trained individuals. It would be easy to assume cerebellum in looking at macerated cerebral tissue protruding from a bloody wound. But since then, around six reputable physicians who saw the president at that time have testified that cerebellum was extruding from the wound at the back of his head. That is an important clue, indicating that something must have burst into the posterior fossa with sufficient force to uproot the cerebellum and blow a substantial hole through the heavy, covering, well-anchored, tentorium, which separates cerebellum from the main chamber of the skull.

    ***

    https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKlivingston.htm

    The neck wound was never dissected at autopsy, and Dr. Humes claimed that that was because he was unaware that there was a wound there, since an emergency tracheotomy had been performed at the same location in Kennedy's neck. Dr. Livingston says that Humes was aware of the wound, before the autopsy ever began, because Livingston himself had told Humes all about it. Believe whom you will (I can guess which!), Professor, but the neck wound was never dissected at autopsy, regardless, while the back wound was probed, as I already have discussed, and found to be a dead end (i.e., the bullet barely penetrated the body, possibly because of Kennedy's back-brace, and then fell out, probably as a result of resuscitation efforts in the E.R.). Let's not forget, either, that, on Sunday afternoon, November 24, 1963, Dr. Humes was writing his autopsy report, at home, when he heard the news that Lee Oswald had been murdered-- in police custody, at police headquarters, flanked by police brass-- by a well-known Dallas nightclub impresario. How did Dr. Humes react to that shocking news? He took his draft autopsy report and burned it in his fireplace.

    "As for the Governor, one’s memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame."

    Translation: "I believe whatever evidence that supports my ideologically derived belief in the "lone nut" hypothesis, and I reject whatever evidence that does not!"

    If you think that a fake assassination expert like, say, Gerald Posner has spent more time watching the Zapruder film, frame by frame, than the aforementioned Dr. Thompson, you are even more ridiculous than even I had yet imagined! Even an academic dilettante like you can see, in the Zapruder film, that JFK reacted to his being shot well before Governor Connally reacted to his being shot. Your "experts" claim that Connally had a "delayed reaction"-- even holding onto his Stetson, after his wrist on that hand had been violently shattered! Your "experts" are utterly and laughably full of shit.

  258. @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law."

    Did you make it through your first week of Criminal Law, Alden, let alone through Trial Advocacy? The prosecution bases its entire presentation at trial on fitting its evidence into its theory of the crime; it makes its opening and closing arguments-- which likewise are not evidence-- by fitting the evidence to match its theory of the crime. Motive is not an element of the crime-- except for "hate crimes"-- but the prosecution is relentless in trying to convince the trier of fact, whether jury or judge, that the accused had the motive to do what it charges was done.

    "All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence."

    Did a Basic Legal Skills instructor actually pass a law student who ever wrote such a sentence?!? Mine promised to flunk any of us who wrote "judgement" rather than "judgment"-- the dictionary notwithstanding!

    Replies: @Alden

    Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes. And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Alden

    Um, uhh, VI Warshavski reference? David Duchovny reference?

    Replies: @Alden

    , @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes."

    I began law school on Monday, September 27, 1982, and graduated (in absentia-- I skipped graduation for each of my four university degrees) on Saturday, June 15, 1985, along with most of my law-school classmates, including:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Durkan

    . . . and . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Satterberg

    (. . . and his wife, an in-house Microsoft attorney, whom I dated before he did, when we were all 1Ls).

    Here is the brutally depressing building wherein we and our law-school classmates were interned, during those brutally depressing few years, before Bill Gates' dad (a very prominent Seattle attorney and a two-time UW alumnus, as am I) paid for a new building, to be named in his own honor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Hall_(University_of_Washington)

    My criminal-law experience is admittedly very limited. I worked on the Exxon Valdez criminal case, defending the pipeline consortium, Alyeska, as part of the now-defunct San Francisco-based law firm of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyeska_Pipeline_Service_Company

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heller_Ehrman

    On the same day that the Exxon Valdez ran aground on Bligh Reef, I was doing some social-scientific consulting work with a small legal-consulting firm, Susan Lee & Associates, in downtown Seattle, on behalf of the Department of Justice, which was prosecuting two corporate executives for fraud. As in Anchorage, later in the year, my side won. Unlike in Anchorage, I waived my agreed upon consulting fees for my services, that Holy Week in Seattle, pro bono publico.

    "And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?"

    I never did assume that you did. I was writing, quite sarcastically, in reply to your writing:

    "Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law."

    Long story short, again, I am a retired attorney (inter alia), while you are . . . not!

    By the way, which "TV shoes" do you most like to watch, now that you are an old woman, and have nothing much worthwhile to do with yourself?

    Replies: @Alden, @Hibernian

  259. @TWS
    @J.Ross

    How did Alden miss this comment. I expected an epistle about THE MEN OF UNZ since yesterday.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  260. @Alden
    @D. K.

    Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes. And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @D. K.

    Um, uhh, VI Warshavski reference? David Duchovny reference?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @J.Ross

    Never watched TV police and legal dramas. Going back to that gawd awful Hill Street Blues.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  261. @TWS
    @WaffleStaffel

    Funniest Unz comment in months. Makes The Duck larper look lame.

    Replies: @WaffleStaffel

    Do you have anything substantive to add, or are you just trying to display how clever you think you are?

  262. @J.Ross
    @Alden

    Um, uhh, VI Warshavski reference? David Duchovny reference?

    Replies: @Alden

    Never watched TV police and legal dramas. Going back to that gawd awful Hill Street Blues.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Alden

    If we get a capacity for video the optimum mode is Steve is a long black coat, walking the beach, with Jake, reading government statistics and lyingpress headlines out of a little black book.
    STEVE: Sometimes I think I'll never understand this world. And sometimes I'm afraid I do understand it. Isn't that right, Jake?
    JAKE: Woof!
    [saxophone music intensifies]

  263. @Alden
    @Paul Jolliffe

    Appalling shocking news!!!!! !!!!!!!! Security guards carry guns and when an assassin pulls a gun in the same room the protectee is in the security guard does what is required in his job description. Pulls out his own gun.

    The MEN OF UNZ the MEN OF UNZ , no common sense , so incredibly naive and ignorant. In this case ignorant of what security guards do.

    Replies: @D. K.

    “Appalling shocking news!!!!! !!!!!!!! Security guards carry guns and when an assassin pulls a gun in the same room the protectee is in the security guard does what is required in his job description. Pulls out his own gun.”

    His company-issued weapon, for his new job as a security guard, was a .38-caliber handgun. His personal weapon was a .22-caliber handgun, as was Sirhan’s handgun. Along with claiming that he never fired the weapon that eyewitnesses saw him draw, during the shooting, the security guard claimed that he was using his company-issued .38, not his personal .22, that night. As noted by Mr. Jolliffe, above:

    “Further he later lied when he alleged that he had previously sold that .22.
    Proof came in the form of a receipt from a cash sale of that gun, a receipt in Cesar’s own handwriting.
    Finally, that gun was (remarkably) recovered from a lake in Arkansas in 2006, apparently too degraded to determine a ballistic match.”

    The bullet fragments from the fatal head shot were never tested either– i.e., they were never matched to any weapon, including Sirhan’s handgun.

  264. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    You were the one who brought up the 'trained attorney' mess. I pointed out to you the reason he's not practicing law and what he''s said about another case in which he is 'interested' in the outcome. There's more where that came from. Guy's a mess. Ethel has nine surviving children (between the ages of 52 and 71). Try quoting one of the smarter and saner ones.

    Replies: @D. K., @Hibernian

    I think he was a professor at Pace University Law School (not exactly another Harvard) not that many years ago. (He started there four years after the heroin incident.) He’s had a long career practicing law. (Just stating a fact; I have no use for any Kennedy.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.

  265. @D. K.
    @David In TN

    How many such drug episodes has RFK Jr. had since he completed drug rehabilitation, thirty-eight years ago, David?

    To repeat:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    Feel welcome to read the rest of the long section about RFK Jr.'s long legal career at . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    Replies: @Hibernian, @David In TN, @Alden

    Tell me that incident wouldn’t have ended the legal career of a John Doe Esq. of poor or even middle class origins and no connections.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Hibernian

    "Tell me that incident wouldn’t have ended the legal career of a John Doe Esq. of poor or even middle class origins and no connections."

    Maybe or maybe not-- drug addiction is not necessarily viewed as a sign of a malign character, like murder or rape, and one's being able to get through rehab, stay clean, and complete one's probation successfully, would probably get most young lawyer's back on track, bar-wise; finding a legal job, on the other hand....

    Regardless, the claim was that RFK Jr. had not been able to practice law, since his arrest in 1983, and that I was therefore misleading the readers by claiming that he was an attorney, who knows the law better than, say, an autistic academic with no training in the law. My simply pointing to RFK Jr.'s entry at Wikipedia.org, where his long legal career, post-1983, is spelled out at some length, gets the voluminous Kennedy-haters, here, in high dudgeon, and gets me labeled a Kennedy "hagiographer" by a lonely and bitter old woman. As my late mother was wont to say, "Can't win for losin'!

  266. @D. K.
    @Alden

    "You should write for Saturday Night Live. In fact this thread is turning into the very funny early SNL and Monty Python skits. As usual."

    You should have addressed the evidence of the case that I laid out in the comment to which you were responding. You failed to do so. "As usual."

    Feel welcome to try this again, Alden:

    "As you (would have) learned in law school, the prosecution’s (or defense’s) theory of a crime is not evidence, admissible or otherwise. Autopsy findings are evidence. Crime-scene forensic findings are evidence. Eyewitness testimony is evidence.

    "As stated above, the finding of coroner Thomas Naguchi that Senator Kennedy died from a gun shot to his brain that was fired at virtually point-blank range, from just behind his right ear, entering at an upward trajectory, is simply inconsistent with the overwhelming eyewitness testimony as to Sirhan Sirhan’s position, vis-a-vis Senator Kennedy, during the entirety of the shooting. Any credible theory of the crime has to be consistent with that evidence. The prosecution’s theory was not and is not consistent with that evidence, and never will be."

    Now, pray tell, what was so comically mistaken about anything that I wrote in those two paragraphs?

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman

    Do not feed the troll.
    She is on a roll.

    There are threads where she makes interesting contributions.
    This is not one of them.

  267. @D. K.
    @David In TN

    How many such drug episodes has RFK Jr. had since he completed drug rehabilitation, thirty-eight years ago, David?

    To repeat:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    Feel welcome to read the rest of the long section about RFK Jr.'s long legal career at . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    Replies: @Hibernian, @David In TN, @Alden

    Question: How many of Bobby Jr.’s wives have hanged themselves? Answer: One.

  268. @prosa123
    @Hibernian

    Giuseppe Zangara missed Roosevelt and hit Cermak because he was very short, just five feet even according to some reports, and had to stand on a wobbly wooden folding chair to fire over the crowd.

    Replies: @Hibernian

    Roosevelt wasn’t all that close to Cermak (at the moment of the shooting, I mean.)

  269. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck.

    As for the Governor, one's memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame.

    Replies: @David In TN, @D. K.

    Arguing with these cretins is like teaching history to a rock.

    The Kennedy worshippers have never accepted Oswald and Sirhan as the assassins, i.e. “It had to be a silly little Communist.”

  270. @Alden
    @D. K.

    Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes. And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?

    Replies: @J.Ross, @D. K.

    “Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes.”

    I began law school on Monday, September 27, 1982, and graduated (in absentia– I skipped graduation for each of my four university degrees) on Saturday, June 15, 1985, along with most of my law-school classmates, including:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Durkan

    . . . and . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Satterberg

    (. . . and his wife, an in-house Microsoft attorney, whom I dated before he did, when we were all 1Ls).

    Here is the brutally depressing building wherein we and our law-school classmates were interned, during those brutally depressing few years, before Bill Gates’ dad (a very prominent Seattle attorney and a two-time UW alumnus, as am I) paid for a new building, to be named in his own honor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Hall_(University_of_Washington)

    My criminal-law experience is admittedly very limited. I worked on the Exxon Valdez criminal case, defending the pipeline consortium, Alyeska, as part of the now-defunct San Francisco-based law firm of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyeska_Pipeline_Service_Company

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heller_Ehrman

    On the same day that the Exxon Valdez ran aground on Bligh Reef, I was doing some social-scientific consulting work with a small legal-consulting firm, Susan Lee & Associates, in downtown Seattle, on behalf of the Department of Justice, which was prosecuting two corporate executives for fraud. As in Anchorage, later in the year, my side won. Unlike in Anchorage, I waived my agreed upon consulting fees for my services, that Holy Week in Seattle, pro bono publico.

    “And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?”

    I never did assume that you did. I was writing, quite sarcastically, in reply to your writing:

    “Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law.”

    Long story short, again, I am a retired attorney (inter alia), while you are . . . not!

    By the way, which “TV shoes” do you most like to watch, now that you are an old woman, and have nothing much worthwhile to do with yourself?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @D. K.

    Another comment from Derek, the unknown Kennedy.

    , @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    I'm sure you treated opposing counsel with the utmost respect.

    Replies: @D. K.

  271. @Buffalo Joe
    Kennedys have no traction, when was the last time one was considered for a political office? Today's dems don't invoke JFK, too centrist, after all, asking ..." what can you do for your country" and not the reverse. Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, avowed radical communists and members of the terrorist Weather Underground, mentors of obama and surrogate parents to San Francisco DA, chesa boudin, dedicated their communist manifesto, "Prairie Fire" to Sirhan Sirhan. And these people still have clout. boudin's father, convicted of Second Degree murder for his role in a robbery to fund the Weather Underground, was just granted clemency by andrew cuomo. Interesting thread that runs through all these people.

    Replies: @Brutusale, @ScarletNumber

    Amy Kennedy was one of only two Democrats to lose election to Congress in New Jersey in 2020. She is married to former congressman Patrick, who is Teddy’s son.

  272. Of course Bobby’s former son-in-law Andrew was self-deposed from being Governor of New York this month, so it hasn’t been a good month all around.

    • Troll: Buzz Mohawk
  273. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    Sirhan Sirhan was not charged with, tried for, nor convicted of felony murder-- any more than he was charged with, tried for, or convicted of attempted murder. Any such criminal charge has to be proved both as to the alleged criminal act itself (the so-called actus reus) and the actual mental state of the defendant at the time of the alleged criminal act (the so-called mens rea). There is strong evidence that Sirhan was acting under an hypnotic suggestion. Whether that would have been his own or someone else's suggestion is unknown.

    Replies: @TWS, @Steve Sailer

    The idea that Sirhan Sirhan was a hypnotized automaton killing machine, like Reggie Jackson coming out of the outfield to try to kill the Queen of England at the baseball game in “The Naked Gun” is an implausible Fun idea. The idea that the security guard accidentally killed RFK while trying to do his job and protect him from Sirhan’s gunfire is a not implausible but Not Fun idea.

    Not surprisingly, the two ideas don’t jibe. It would be like if “The Manchurian Candidate” ends with some random extra accidentally shooting the nominee.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    I am not at all interested in how good of a movie the truth would make (especially since I stopped going to the movies, in the late-1990s); I only am interested in what the truth is, as best as we can ascertain it, at this late date. There is no doubt that Sirhan Sirhan was a student of hypnosis. There is no doubt that he was highly susceptible to hypnosis. His defense team got him to climb the blinds like a monkey, in the middle of a meeting, by planting the hypnotic suggestion, on an earlier occasion, that he would do so, when he heard a specified codeword. The people who interacted with him at the Ambassador Hotel, on the night of the assassination, believed that he might have been in a trance.

    If he was, then the first question is, did he engage in self-hypnosis, in order to "force himself" to go through with a plan that he wanted to carry out-- much as if he were trying to "force himself" to stop smoking-- or was he hypnotized by someone else, without his knowledge of and consent to the mission for which he was hypnotized? If the latter, was he hypnotized to be a successful assassin, or merely to be a diversion and a patsy? I don't know, but our own government, as a "for instance," was doing far more implausible things than that, back in the late-1960s....

  274. @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes."

    I began law school on Monday, September 27, 1982, and graduated (in absentia-- I skipped graduation for each of my four university degrees) on Saturday, June 15, 1985, along with most of my law-school classmates, including:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Durkan

    . . . and . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Satterberg

    (. . . and his wife, an in-house Microsoft attorney, whom I dated before he did, when we were all 1Ls).

    Here is the brutally depressing building wherein we and our law-school classmates were interned, during those brutally depressing few years, before Bill Gates' dad (a very prominent Seattle attorney and a two-time UW alumnus, as am I) paid for a new building, to be named in his own honor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Hall_(University_of_Washington)

    My criminal-law experience is admittedly very limited. I worked on the Exxon Valdez criminal case, defending the pipeline consortium, Alyeska, as part of the now-defunct San Francisco-based law firm of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyeska_Pipeline_Service_Company

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heller_Ehrman

    On the same day that the Exxon Valdez ran aground on Bligh Reef, I was doing some social-scientific consulting work with a small legal-consulting firm, Susan Lee & Associates, in downtown Seattle, on behalf of the Department of Justice, which was prosecuting two corporate executives for fraud. As in Anchorage, later in the year, my side won. Unlike in Anchorage, I waived my agreed upon consulting fees for my services, that Holy Week in Seattle, pro bono publico.

    "And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?"

    I never did assume that you did. I was writing, quite sarcastically, in reply to your writing:

    "Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law."

    Long story short, again, I am a retired attorney (inter alia), while you are . . . not!

    By the way, which "TV shoes" do you most like to watch, now that you are an old woman, and have nothing much worthwhile to do with yourself?

    Replies: @Alden, @Hibernian

    Another comment from Derek, the unknown Kennedy.

    • LOL: J.Ross
  275. @D. K.
    @David In TN

    How many such drug episodes has RFK Jr. had since he completed drug rehabilitation, thirty-eight years ago, David?

    To repeat:

    ***

    In 1983, when Kennedy was an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan,[citation needed] he was arrested and pled guilty to heroin possession and was sentenced to two years' probation and community service.[13][14] Following his arrest he entered a drug treatment center and during his probation volunteered for the Natural Resources Defense Council. His probation ended a year early.[15] In 1984, Kennedy joined Riverkeeper as an investigator, and was promoted to senior attorney[16] when he was admitted to the New York bar in 1985.[15]

    Kennedy is an environmental law specialist and partner in the law firms of Morgan & Morgan and of Kennedy & Madonna, LLP,[17] and is an advocate for environmental justice.

    Through litigation, lobbying, teaching, and public campaigns and activism, Kennedy has advocated for the protection of waterways, indigenous rights, and renewable energy.[18]

    In 2018, the National Trial Lawyers Association awarded Kennedy and his trial team Trial Team of the Year for their work winning a $289 million jury verdict in Dewayne "Lee" Johnson v Monsanto.[19]

    ***

    Feel welcome to read the rest of the long section about RFK Jr.'s long legal career at . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.#Career

    Replies: @Hibernian, @David In TN, @Alden

    Robert Jr has been a government and NGO parasite his entire life. Fired from a County prosecutors for inability to preform his job. Then on and on to various bogus non profits. Surprised he didn’t get into Pitbull Rescue non profits. One of them in Utah pulls in 55 million a year. Best thing about rescuing pit bulls they can’t snitch to the press about what’s really going on.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    People can read his Wikipedia.org page and make their own individual judgments as to how much he has accomplished in his life. What have you ever accomplished in life, Alden? Feel welcome to post a link to your own Wikipedia.org page....

    Replies: @Alden

  276. @D. K.
    @Alden

    There are two exclusive possibilities about the unending exposition of conspiracy theories of the JFK assassination: to the extent that those theories can reasonably be said to be distinct from one another, either one of those conspiracy theories is essentially correct, while all of the other conspiracy theories are essentially incorrect, or else all of the conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect. Even if all of the conspiracy theories ever posited for the JFK assassination, to date, are essentially incorrect, however, that does not mean that the Warren Commission's official conclusion that Lee Oswald was essentially the proverbial "lone nut" assassin is correct. There are two other logical, if unlikely, possibilities: either another distinct conspiracy scenario, not yet hypothesized, was responsible for JFK's death, or else an additional assassin, independent and unaware of Lee Oswald's presence and intentions, fired the fatal head shot that killed President Kennedy.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    Stephen Hunter’s novel “The Third Bullet” is a tour d’force of theorizing how the anti-JFK conspiracy books could be factually correct, but it still could be a conspiracy.

  277. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    RFK Jr., upon the death of the security guard:

    ***

    Thane Eugene Cesar died today in the Philippines. Compelling evidence suggests that Cesar murdered my father. On June 5, 1968, Cesar, an employee in a classified section of Lockheed’s Burbank facility, was moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel. He had landed the job about one week earlier. Cesar waited in the pantry as my father spoke in the ballroom, then grabbed my father by the elbow and guided him toward Sirhan. With 77 people in the pantry, every eyewitness said Sirhan was always in front on my father at a 3-6 feet distance. Sirhan fired two shots toward my father before he was tackled. From under the dog pile, Sirhan emptied his 8 chamber revolver firing 6 more shots in the opposite direction 5 of them striking bystander and one going wild . By his own account, Cesar was directly behind my dad holding his right elbow with his own gun drawn when my dad fell backwards on top of him. Cesar repeatedly changed his story about exactly when he drew his weapon. According to the Coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, all 4 shots that struck my father were ‘contact’ shots fired from behind my dad with the barrel touching or nearly touching his body. Cesar sold his .22 to a co-worker weeks after the assassination warning him that it had been used in a crime. Cesar lied to police claiming that he’d disposed of the gun months before the assassination. Cesar was a bigot who hated the Kennedys for their advocacy of Civil Rights for blacks. I had plans to meet Thane Eugene Cesar in the Philippines last June until he demanded a payment of $25,000 through his agent Dan Moldea. Ironically, Moldea penned a meticulous and compelling indictment of Cesar in a 1995 book and then suddenly exculpated him by fiat in a bizarre and nonsensical final chapter. Police have never seriously investigated Cesar’s role in my father’s killing.

    ***

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman, @Art Deco, @Steve Sailer

    Mr. Cesar must have been a very brave man to march RFK right to Sirhan knowing Sirhan was going to shoot him (and quite possibley Cesar as well).

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    "Mr. Cesar must have been a very brave man to march RFK right to Sirhan knowing Sirhan was going to shoot him (and quite possibley Cesar as well)."

    Yes, he would have been, especially if he did not know how good of a shot Sirhan was or was not-- especially while hypnotised!?! Of course, if Cesar was not part of a conspiracy, but was merely an inept neophyte security guard, who wound up shooting toward Sirhan while falling backward to the floor, while still hanging on to Senator Kennedy, than his bravery, or lack thereof, is fairly immaterial.

  278. @D. K.
    @Steve Sailer

    Christianity is not an ethnicity, Steve. Didn't the clerics get that point across to you, back when you were in high school? What ethnicity were the freedom fighters who blew up the King David Hotel?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Jewish.

  279. @Alden
    @J.Ross

    Never watched TV police and legal dramas. Going back to that gawd awful Hill Street Blues.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    If we get a capacity for video the optimum mode is Steve is a long black coat, walking the beach, with Jake, reading government statistics and lyingpress headlines out of a little black book.
    STEVE: Sometimes I think I’ll never understand this world. And sometimes I’m afraid I do understand it. Isn’t that right, Jake?
    JAKE: Woof!
    [saxophone music intensifies]

    • Thanks: Alden
  280. @Jack Armstrong
    @Wilkey

    Sirhan should return to Jerusalem.

    Replies: @Alden

    He can’t. The Jews confiscated his family home in Jerusalem and the families’ farms outside Jerusalem. Farms in 1947 and family home in 1948.

    A heavily armed group of Zionists Israeli army thugs broke into the home the family OWNED. The family was given one hour to clear out with only as much as they could carry by hand. 7 kids youngest was 4 year old Sirhan Sirhan. Family found refuge in a Greek Orthodox pilgrimage hostel established 1,600 years before the Russian jews invaded Palestine. The Sirhans weren’t the only family treated like this. The entire non Jewish population of Palestine was treated like this.

    How’d you like that to happen to you? Or do you think bible thumper preacher Zionist James’s Hagee will save you because you’re an OT wanna be Jew?
    That’s why Sirhan can’t go back to Jerusalem.

  281. @Art Deco
    @D. K.

    Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck.

    As for the Governor, one's memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame.

    Replies: @David In TN, @D. K.

    “Kennedy had a wound in his throat. You evidently fancy there was a gremlin on the floor of the limousine firing at the President and that the bullet which entered his back then evaporated in his neck.”

    I already have mentioned what happened to the bullet that hit President Kennedy in the upper back– not in his lower neck!– and that CE 399 [supra], if it is genuine, is undoubtedly the bullet that entered his back, only to fall out at Parkland Hospital– not the bullet that then wounded Governor Connally in multiple locations, including shattering the wrist of the hand that was holding his Stetson, winding up in his leg. I also have mentioned already that all of the doctors and nurses at Parkland Hospital had assumed that the wound in the front of Kennedy’s neck was an entry wound, because of its small size. Here is an old letter to Newsweek, from someone with expertise on both such wounds, in general, and the JFK assassination and autopsy, in particular:

    ***

    (2) Robert B. Livingston, letter to Maynard Parker, editor of Newsweek (10th September, 1993)

    I was Scientific Director of the National Institute for Mental Health and (concurrently) of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, at the time of the assassination. These two institutes are obviously relevant to interpretations of brain damage sustained by the president.

    On the basis of November 22, 1963, broadcasts from Parkland Hospital, I felt obliged to call Commander James Humes, at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, who was about to perform the autopsy. Our telephone conversation was completed before the body arrived at Andrews AFB. I called to retail media reports from Parkland Hospital that there was a small wound in the front of his neck, just to the right of the trachea.

    Humes said he hadn’t been paying attention to the news, but was receptive to what I had to tell him. We had a cordial conversation about this. Based on my knowledge of medical and experimental analyses of bullet wounding, and personal experiences caring for numerous bullet and shrapnel wounds throughout the battle of Okinawa, I told him that a small wound, as described, would have to be a wound of entry. When a bullet exits from flesh, it violently blows out a lot of tissue, usually making a conspicuous cruciate opening with tissue protruding. A wound of entry, however, just punctures as it penetrates. So I stressed the need for him to probe that wound to trace its course fully and to find the location of the bullet or fragments. I especially emphasized that such a wound had to be an entry wound. And since the president was facing forward the whole time, that meant that there had to be a conspiracy. As we talked about that, he interrupted the conversation momentarily. He came back on the line to say, “I’m sorry. Dr. Livingston, but the FBI won’t let me talk any longer.” Thus, the conversation ended.

    Two important subsequent events are noteworthy: Commander Humes did not dissect that wound, and when asked why not, in the Warren Commission hearings, he said that he didn’t know about the small wound in the neck until the following day when he had a conversation with Dr. Perry at Parkland Hospital.

    A further issue concerns reports of the appearance of cerebellar tissue in the occipital wound. This was first reported “live” as observations by an orderly, and by a nurse, both of whom were in the surgery where attempts to resuscitate the president were conducted prior to his death. I didn’t give any credibility to those stories and dismissed them from my focus at the time, attributing what I thought must be mistaken identification of cerebellum to a likely lack of familiarity with neuroanatomy by two non-medically trained individuals. It would be easy to assume cerebellum in looking at macerated cerebral tissue protruding from a bloody wound. But since then, around six reputable physicians who saw the president at that time have testified that cerebellum was extruding from the wound at the back of his head. That is an important clue, indicating that something must have burst into the posterior fossa with sufficient force to uproot the cerebellum and blow a substantial hole through the heavy, covering, well-anchored, tentorium, which separates cerebellum from the main chamber of the skull.

    ***

    https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKlivingston.htm

    The neck wound was never dissected at autopsy, and Dr. Humes claimed that that was because he was unaware that there was a wound there, since an emergency tracheotomy had been performed at the same location in Kennedy’s neck. Dr. Livingston says that Humes was aware of the wound, before the autopsy ever began, because Livingston himself had told Humes all about it. Believe whom you will (I can guess which!), Professor, but the neck wound was never dissected at autopsy, regardless, while the back wound was probed, as I already have discussed, and found to be a dead end (i.e., the bullet barely penetrated the body, possibly because of Kennedy’s back-brace, and then fell out, probably as a result of resuscitation efforts in the E.R.). Let’s not forget, either, that, on Sunday afternoon, November 24, 1963, Dr. Humes was writing his autopsy report, at home, when he heard the news that Lee Oswald had been murdered– in police custody, at police headquarters, flanked by police brass– by a well-known Dallas nightclub impresario. How did Dr. Humes react to that shocking news? He took his draft autopsy report and burned it in his fireplace.

    “As for the Governor, one’s memory of events which occur in seconds can be quite unreliable. People have gamed this out for years looking at the Zapruder film frame by frame.”

    Translation: “I believe whatever evidence that supports my ideologically derived belief in the “lone nut” hypothesis, and I reject whatever evidence that does not!”

    If you think that a fake assassination expert like, say, Gerald Posner has spent more time watching the Zapruder film, frame by frame, than the aforementioned Dr. Thompson, you are even more ridiculous than even I had yet imagined! Even an academic dilettante like you can see, in the Zapruder film, that JFK reacted to his being shot well before Governor Connally reacted to his being shot. Your “experts” claim that Connally had a “delayed reaction”– even holding onto his Stetson, after his wrist on that hand had been violently shattered! Your “experts” are utterly and laughably full of shit.

    • Thanks: Mr. Anon
  282. @D. K.
    @Art Deco

    "Yes it is known data, but inconvenient to people given to onanistic speculation. If you fancy it isn’t, you might try taking an inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant."

    Your repeating of your claim, Rainman, does not make it any more true than it was the last time that you claimed it. Being autistic, as you are, do feel free, however, to provide us civilians with LexisNexis' exhaustive "inventory of things which would have to be true if Oswald were not an assailant." Regardless, if Oswald were "an assailant" in the JFK assassination-- despite a paraffin result to the contrary-- that would not mean that he was "the assailant"-- i.e., the "lone nut" who blew JFK's brains out in public.

    "Keep in mind (1) Cyril Wecht concedes that the three shots came from the rear (It’s his view that the origin of at least one shot must have been from some other location) and (2) Josiah Thompson has been flogging the idea for > 50 years that one shot could not have wounded both the President and the Governor because the trajectory is wrong. The problem has been that the schematic drawing he used in his first book was inaccurate, not properly depicting the juxtaposition of the President and the Governor (the Governor was on a meridian six inches to the President’s left, and several inches closer to the ground). Thompson was invested in the acoustic testimony which emerged in 1978, but that’s been discredited several times over."

    As you are well aware, Rainman, Governor Connally insisted, from his first post-assassination press conference until his dying day, that he was not hit with the same bullet as JFK, prior to the latter's fatal head wound. The claim that Connally not only was mistaken, but that his body had a "delayed reaction" to his being wounded in multiple body locations-- including having his wrist shattered!-- is utterly ridiculous. Contrary to the dishonest claim of you "single-bullet theor[ists]," JFK was shot in the back, nearly six inches below the top of his shirt collar, and nearly four inches below the bottom of his shirt collar-- not at the base of his neck, as falsely illustrated by the Warren Commission to support Arlen Specter's nonsense!

    https://jfkindex.com/photos/SRexhibit59.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.vidiars.com/jfkwatergate/ShirtBackwRuler.jpg

    . . . and . . .

    http://www.thinktruth.com/images/BulletAutopsy1.jpg

    vs.

    https://i0.wp.com/jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JFK-Illustration-1.png?fit=717%2C324

    During his autopsy, JFK's back wound was probed, both digitally and with a metal probe, by both Dr. Humes, who performed the autopsy, and one of the other doctors present in the crowded room. They found that the wound created a hole that was only about one and a half to two inches deep-- possibly as a result of Kennedy's back-brace. If CE 399 [supra] is a genuine bullet from the JFK assassination, rather than a bullet that was planted at the hospital, as some others claim, than it is obvious to me that CE 399 is the bullet that had entered JFK's back, but then been dislodged onto his stretcher, only later to be knocked to the floor of Parkland Hospital, as I already have described.

    Dr. Wecht's nemesis, Dr. Micheal Baden, is on tape-- overlooking the facts that I already have cited-- claiming that Kennedy's back wound and the wound in his neck-- which the Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses all assumed to be an entry wound, because of its small size-- would line up perfectly, if we just assumed that JFK was bending forward, say, eighty-some degrees (Baden does so in the video), albeit for no conceivable reason, during the brief interlude in the Zapruder film during which the President is hidden from view behind the street sign! Unfortunately for Dr. Baden, there is no photographic nor other known evidence supporting his ludicrous hypothesis.

    As for the police-radio recordings, long after you had read in . . . Was it "Hustler" that published your drummer friend's supposed debunking, Rainman? . . . that the anomalous sounds recorded on a motorcycle policeman's open microphone could not possibly have been gunshots, the debate among more open-minded observers continued:

    https://jfkfacts.org/is-there-an-audio-recording-of-the-jfk-assassination/

    Guess what, Rainman? Dr. Thompson is still alive-- and your pseudonymous Internet comments from the faculty lounge have yet to suppress his newly refined theory of President Kennedy's assassination!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_Thompson#Last_Second_in_Dallas_(2021)

    https://www.amazon.com/Last-Second-Dallas-Josiah-Thompson/dp/0700630082

    You better get your beloved Big Tech oligarchs on the case, stat!

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Alden

    Isn’t it Dr Michael Baden who claims Jeff Epstein hanged himself by kneeling on the floor and leaning into the noose he fashioned from paper bedsheets?

    Derek, the unknown Kennedy. And family hagiographer.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    For the record, "D. K." is what a friend and former legal colleague [supra] calls me. Those are my first and middle initials; none of my names-- including my self-selected Confirmation name-- is either "Derek" or "Kennedy." Sorry, 'Zippi'!

    The Kennedy family arrived in America in 1849. My Anglo-Irish great-grandfather did not arrive here until the Great Wave, decades later, and settled in Illinois, not Massachusetts. My father's namesake arrived in Massachusetts, circa 1635. (That ancestor's own father was reputedly murdered, en route, by pirates.) As far as I know, at this point, he was my earliest ancestor to settle permanently in the New World. He was an early resident (circa 1640) of Southampton, Long Island, and one of the actual founders of East Hampton:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Hampton_(town),_New_York#Anglo-European_settlement

    Replies: @D. K., @Alden

  283. @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    Mr. Cesar must have been a very brave man to march RFK right to Sirhan knowing Sirhan was going to shoot him (and quite possibley Cesar as well).

    Replies: @D. K.

    “Mr. Cesar must have been a very brave man to march RFK right to Sirhan knowing Sirhan was going to shoot him (and quite possibley Cesar as well).”

    Yes, he would have been, especially if he did not know how good of a shot Sirhan was or was not– especially while hypnotised!?! Of course, if Cesar was not part of a conspiracy, but was merely an inept neophyte security guard, who wound up shooting toward Sirhan while falling backward to the floor, while still hanging on to Senator Kennedy, than his bravery, or lack thereof, is fairly immaterial.

  284. @Steve Sailer
    @D. K.

    The idea that Sirhan Sirhan was a hypnotized automaton killing machine, like Reggie Jackson coming out of the outfield to try to kill the Queen of England at the baseball game in "The Naked Gun" is an implausible Fun idea. The idea that the security guard accidentally killed RFK while trying to do his job and protect him from Sirhan's gunfire is a not implausible but Not Fun idea.

    Not surprisingly, the two ideas don't jibe. It would be like if "The Manchurian Candidate" ends with some random extra accidentally shooting the nominee.

    Replies: @D. K.

    I am not at all interested in how good of a movie the truth would make (especially since I stopped going to the movies, in the late-1990s); I only am interested in what the truth is, as best as we can ascertain it, at this late date. There is no doubt that Sirhan Sirhan was a student of hypnosis. There is no doubt that he was highly susceptible to hypnosis. His defense team got him to climb the blinds like a monkey, in the middle of a meeting, by planting the hypnotic suggestion, on an earlier occasion, that he would do so, when he heard a specified codeword. The people who interacted with him at the Ambassador Hotel, on the night of the assassination, believed that he might have been in a trance.

    If he was, then the first question is, did he engage in self-hypnosis, in order to “force himself” to go through with a plan that he wanted to carry out– much as if he were trying to “force himself” to stop smoking– or was he hypnotized by someone else, without his knowledge of and consent to the mission for which he was hypnotized? If the latter, was he hypnotized to be a successful assassin, or merely to be a diversion and a patsy? I don’t know, but our own government, as a “for instance,” was doing far more implausible things than that, back in the late-1960s….

  285. @Alden
    @D. K.

    Robert Jr has been a government and NGO parasite his entire life. Fired from a County prosecutors for inability to preform his job. Then on and on to various bogus non profits. Surprised he didn’t get into Pitbull Rescue non profits. One of them in Utah pulls in 55 million a year. Best thing about rescuing pit bulls they can’t snitch to the press about what’s really going on.

    Replies: @D. K.

    People can read his Wikipedia.org page and make their own individual judgments as to how much he has accomplished in his life. What have you ever accomplished in life, Alden? Feel welcome to post a link to your own Wikipedia.org page….

    • Replies: @Alden
    @D. K.

    RFK jr has accomplished 2 things in his life.

    1 permanently disable a 16 year old girl for the rest of her life while recklessly driving under the influence of an illegal drug

    2 Been paid hundreds of thousands of tax payers and foundations money as executive director of his various bull shit non profits. Non profits that keep either 89 or 95 percent of all donations for salaries, company cars company credit cards company computers etc depending on which state the non profit (lol) corporation is registered in.

    RFK jr hasn’t earned a dollar in his life. His entire income comes from those bogus non profits.

    Another comment from Derek the unknown Kennedy. Or do you work out of the Kennedy central office on 5th Av NYC?

    Replies: @D. K.

  286. @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    Tell me that incident wouldn't have ended the legal career of a John Doe Esq. of poor or even middle class origins and no connections.

    Replies: @D. K.

    “Tell me that incident wouldn’t have ended the legal career of a John Doe Esq. of poor or even middle class origins and no connections.”

    Maybe or maybe not– drug addiction is not necessarily viewed as a sign of a malign character, like murder or rape, and one’s being able to get through rehab, stay clean, and complete one’s probation successfully, would probably get most young lawyer’s back on track, bar-wise; finding a legal job, on the other hand….

    Regardless, the claim was that RFK Jr. had not been able to practice law, since his arrest in 1983, and that I was therefore misleading the readers by claiming that he was an attorney, who knows the law better than, say, an autistic academic with no training in the law. My simply pointing to RFK Jr.’s entry at Wikipedia.org, where his long legal career, post-1983, is spelled out at some length, gets the voluminous Kennedy-haters, here, in high dudgeon, and gets me labeled a Kennedy “hagiographer” by a lonely and bitter old woman. As my late mother was wont to say, “Can’t win for losin’!

  287. @Art Deco
    @Mr. Anon

    You've all had 56 years to delineate an alternative to the Warren Commission's findings. And by that, I mean you start with the event itself and build your case concentrically. The best of the Warren Commission's detractors would be Josiah Thompson and Cyril Wecht, because they actually engage in inductive reasoning. Their efforts to just call into question certain points (without building an alternative understanding) have not succeeded. Wecht speaks with the most authority because he's a forensic pathologist, but his current argument centers on bullet trajectories (a subject on which he does not speak with authority).

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Sure, I believe that mob-connected night-club manager, mafia bag-man, and gun-runner Jack Ruby was so broken up about poor Jackie having to sit through Oswald’s trial that he shot him in the garage of the Dallas Police Department. He was just such a sensitive soul.

    I believe that a former director of the CIA who despised JFK because JFK had him canned was a good choice to sit on the panel investigating his death.

    I believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was a one-off assassin, despite the fact that he had a virtual doppelganger in another marine who espoused communism, defected to the Soviet Union, and then returned.

    I don’t know what happened in Dallas on Nov. 22nd, 1963. Neither do you. You are just a smug, officious twit who thinks he knows everything. You don’t, idiot.

  288. @Mike Tre
    Somewhat related:

    300 recall ballots found in passed out felon's car in 7 Eleven parking lot:

    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-23/torrance-police-find-more-than-300-ballots-in-suspects-car-along-with-gun-drugs

    They also found drugs, multiple IDs, a gun, and credit cards. the honor student's name has not been released.

    Replies: @El Dato, @JimDandy

    Yeah. The Dems realized they had a great asset in their criminal black constituency, so they put them to work stealing the election in the urban centers of swing states, with the honest assurance that there was no way they’d ever be held accountable for their actions. There’s no reason to believe this won’t get worse and worse. I don’t know if this guy you’re referencing is black, but it provided me with a nice opportunity to state a fact many reasonable people can’t, for some reason, permit themselves to believe.

  289. @Steve Sailer
    @clifford brown

    Sirhan is a Christian Palestinian by ethnicity, like George Habash.

    Replies: @D. K., @S Johnson

    Sirhan Sirhan’s family weren’t just Christians but Lutherans which is pretty unusual. I would assume that protestant missions in the mid east mostly evangelized among traditional Catholic and Orthodox populations due to the historic penalties against converting from Islam, but perhaps Arabs from smaller Islamic sects were converted too? Does anyone know more?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @S Johnson

    The family were Greek Orthodox in Palestine. In Pasadena When they grew older, the Sirhan brothers including Sirhan became interested in other Christian religions. Sirhan bounced from 7th day Adventist to Rosicrucian.

    Replies: @S Johnson

  290. @Desiderius
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Is he brilliant? How brilliant did one have to be to profit from the Nahtzee despoilage of his own homeland? To short the pound while simultaneously crashing it? Many such cases.

    Doesn't take brilliance if you've got no scruples and enough ill-gotten gains to leverage.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Don’t confuse brilliance with morality. Soros is a psycho, but very clever psycho re. financial machinations.

  291. @Reg Cæsar
    @SunBakedSuburb

    Come in from the sun.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    “Come in from the sun.”

    As soon as the mayonnaise has warmed.

  292. @Alden
    @D. K.

    Isn’t it Dr Michael Baden who claims Jeff Epstein hanged himself by kneeling on the floor and leaning into the noose he fashioned from paper bedsheets?

    Derek, the unknown Kennedy. And family hagiographer.

    Replies: @D. K.

    For the record, “D. K.” is what a friend and former legal colleague [supra] calls me. Those are my first and middle initials; none of my names– including my self-selected Confirmation name– is either “Derek” or “Kennedy.” Sorry, ‘Zippi’!

    The Kennedy family arrived in America in 1849. My Anglo-Irish great-grandfather did not arrive here until the Great Wave, decades later, and settled in Illinois, not Massachusetts. My father’s namesake arrived in Massachusetts, circa 1635. (That ancestor’s own father was reputedly murdered, en route, by pirates.) As far as I know, at this point, he was my earliest ancestor to settle permanently in the New World. He was an early resident (circa 1640) of Southampton, Long Island, and one of the actual founders of East Hampton:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Hampton_(town),_New_York#Anglo-European_settlement

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @D. K.

    P.S. In the words of the old-time newsboys: "Read all about it!"

    https://archive.org/details/cu31924079595892/mode/2up

    , @Alden
    @D. K.

    BFD Mr Kennedy.

    Replies: @D. K.

  293. @D. K.
    @Alden

    For the record, "D. K." is what a friend and former legal colleague [supra] calls me. Those are my first and middle initials; none of my names-- including my self-selected Confirmation name-- is either "Derek" or "Kennedy." Sorry, 'Zippi'!

    The Kennedy family arrived in America in 1849. My Anglo-Irish great-grandfather did not arrive here until the Great Wave, decades later, and settled in Illinois, not Massachusetts. My father's namesake arrived in Massachusetts, circa 1635. (That ancestor's own father was reputedly murdered, en route, by pirates.) As far as I know, at this point, he was my earliest ancestor to settle permanently in the New World. He was an early resident (circa 1640) of Southampton, Long Island, and one of the actual founders of East Hampton:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Hampton_(town),_New_York#Anglo-European_settlement

    Replies: @D. K., @Alden

    P.S. In the words of the old-time newsboys: “Read all about it!”

    https://archive.org/details/cu31924079595892/mode/2up

  294. @D. K.
    @Alden

    People can read his Wikipedia.org page and make their own individual judgments as to how much he has accomplished in his life. What have you ever accomplished in life, Alden? Feel welcome to post a link to your own Wikipedia.org page....

    Replies: @Alden

    RFK jr has accomplished 2 things in his life.

    1 permanently disable a 16 year old girl for the rest of her life while recklessly driving under the influence of an illegal drug

    2 Been paid hundreds of thousands of tax payers and foundations money as executive director of his various bull shit non profits. Non profits that keep either 89 or 95 percent of all donations for salaries, company cars company credit cards company computers etc depending on which state the non profit (lol) corporation is registered in.

    RFK jr hasn’t earned a dollar in his life. His entire income comes from those bogus non profits.

    Another comment from Derek the unknown Kennedy. Or do you work out of the Kennedy central office on 5th Av NYC?

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    I grew up off of 5th Avenue-- in Gary, Indiana ("not Louisiana, Paris, France or Rome").

    Replies: @Hibernian

  295. @D. K.
    @Alden

    For the record, "D. K." is what a friend and former legal colleague [supra] calls me. Those are my first and middle initials; none of my names-- including my self-selected Confirmation name-- is either "Derek" or "Kennedy." Sorry, 'Zippi'!

    The Kennedy family arrived in America in 1849. My Anglo-Irish great-grandfather did not arrive here until the Great Wave, decades later, and settled in Illinois, not Massachusetts. My father's namesake arrived in Massachusetts, circa 1635. (That ancestor's own father was reputedly murdered, en route, by pirates.) As far as I know, at this point, he was my earliest ancestor to settle permanently in the New World. He was an early resident (circa 1640) of Southampton, Long Island, and one of the actual founders of East Hampton:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Hampton_(town),_New_York#Anglo-European_settlement

    Replies: @D. K., @Alden

    BFD Mr Kennedy.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Alden

    Stick it up your ass, and blow it out your nose, 'Zippi'!

  296. @S Johnson
    @Steve Sailer

    Sirhan Sirhan’s family weren’t just Christians but Lutherans which is pretty unusual. I would assume that protestant missions in the mid east mostly evangelized among traditional Catholic and Orthodox populations due to the historic penalties against converting from Islam, but perhaps Arabs from smaller Islamic sects were converted too? Does anyone know more?

    Replies: @Alden

    The family were Greek Orthodox in Palestine. In Pasadena When they grew older, the Sirhan brothers including Sirhan became interested in other Christian religions. Sirhan bounced from 7th day Adventist to Rosicrucian.

    • Thanks: S Johnson
    • Replies: @S Johnson
    @Alden

    Thanks. Bouncing around from sect to sect (like Oswald defecting to the USSR, or the stoner European Muslims who become killers) is pretty common among politically motivated killers.

  297. @Alden
    @D. K.

    RFK jr has accomplished 2 things in his life.

    1 permanently disable a 16 year old girl for the rest of her life while recklessly driving under the influence of an illegal drug

    2 Been paid hundreds of thousands of tax payers and foundations money as executive director of his various bull shit non profits. Non profits that keep either 89 or 95 percent of all donations for salaries, company cars company credit cards company computers etc depending on which state the non profit (lol) corporation is registered in.

    RFK jr hasn’t earned a dollar in his life. His entire income comes from those bogus non profits.

    Another comment from Derek the unknown Kennedy. Or do you work out of the Kennedy central office on 5th Av NYC?

    Replies: @D. K.

    I grew up off of 5th Avenue– in Gary, Indiana (“not Louisiana, Paris, France or Rome”).

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    Doubtless in the once affluent enclave of Miller, or else you're just making up the story out of whole cloth.

    Replies: @D. K.

  298. @Alden
    @D. K.

    BFD Mr Kennedy.

    Replies: @D. K.

    Stick it up your ass, and blow it out your nose, ‘Zippi’!

  299. Barring the unforeseen, this will be cued up as comment #300 in this thread– and not a single one, as far as I can recall, even has attempted to refute the facts that (a) the fatal head shot was delivered at virtually point-blank range, just behind Robert Kennedy’s right ear, at an upward angle, while (b) Sirhan Sirhan was to Kennedy’s front side, firing more or less on the level, never closer than a few feet to Kennedy, and tackled back onto a tabletop, after only his second shot. In other words, no one has bothered to challenge the basic evidence that proves that Sirhan Sirhan could not have killed Robert Kennedy. Odd….

  300. @D. K.
    @Alden

    "Obvious you never went to law school but learned criminal law from watching TV shoes."

    I began law school on Monday, September 27, 1982, and graduated (in absentia-- I skipped graduation for each of my four university degrees) on Saturday, June 15, 1985, along with most of my law-school classmates, including:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Durkan

    . . . and . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Satterberg

    (. . . and his wife, an in-house Microsoft attorney, whom I dated before he did, when we were all 1Ls).

    Here is the brutally depressing building wherein we and our law-school classmates were interned, during those brutally depressing few years, before Bill Gates' dad (a very prominent Seattle attorney and a two-time UW alumnus, as am I) paid for a new building, to be named in his own honor:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Hall_(University_of_Washington)

    My criminal-law experience is admittedly very limited. I worked on the Exxon Valdez criminal case, defending the pipeline consortium, Alyeska, as part of the now-defunct San Francisco-based law firm of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyeska_Pipeline_Service_Company

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heller_Ehrman

    On the same day that the Exxon Valdez ran aground on Bligh Reef, I was doing some social-scientific consulting work with a small legal-consulting firm, Susan Lee & Associates, in downtown Seattle, on behalf of the Department of Justice, which was prosecuting two corporate executives for fraud. As in Anchorage, later in the year, my side won. Unlike in Anchorage, I waived my agreed upon consulting fees for my services, that Holy Week in Seattle, pro bono publico.

    "And I never went to law school. Why do you assume I did?"

    I never did assume that you did. I was writing, quite sarcastically, in reply to your writing:

    "Neither prosecutor nor defense wastes time on theories. All they are interested in is viable prove able hopefully irrefutable evidence. First week of criminal law."

    Long story short, again, I am a retired attorney (inter alia), while you are . . . not!

    By the way, which "TV shoes" do you most like to watch, now that you are an old woman, and have nothing much worthwhile to do with yourself?

    Replies: @Alden, @Hibernian

    I’m sure you treated opposing counsel with the utmost respect.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Hibernian

    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station. Thankfully, no one, during my legal career, ever treated me as Internet trolls routinely treat everyone with whom they disagree. I also was known, and appreciated, for treating the staff better than the other attorneys did. That was because I was from a working class background; my father was an electrician (after six years in the Coast Guard, before, during and after the war) who had grown up in poverty in rural Illinois' coal country (my aforementioned great-grandfather and his brother were killed in a mine cave-in, on Monday, October 14, 1895), and had to drop out of school in the 8th grade, in order to go to work with his father, tarring roofs, during the Great Depression; my mother was an high-school graduate (Gary Horace Mann, five years after Tom Harmon graduated) who was working at U.S. Steel's Gary Works, doing quality control on molten steal, until she got married, after the war.

    Were you always passive-aggressive and hypocritical, or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?

    Replies: @Hibernian

  301. @D. K.
    @Alden

    I grew up off of 5th Avenue-- in Gary, Indiana ("not Louisiana, Paris, France or Rome").

    Replies: @Hibernian

    Doubtless in the once affluent enclave of Miller, or else you’re just making up the story out of whole cloth.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Hibernian

    I was born in Methodist Hospital, as were all of my eight siblings (and Michael Jackson and all of his siblings), because my mother had watched her mother be killed at the Catholic hospital, in 1933, and I grew up in Brunswick, on the west side of Gary. I was in kindergarten during Brunswick Elementary School's inaugural year. Alas . . .

    https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/nwitimes.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/c9/6c9d5b65-40bf-5182-bcd4-85ce914703ff/5947589c0a829.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C800

  302. @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    I'm sure you treated opposing counsel with the utmost respect.

    Replies: @D. K.

    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station. Thankfully, no one, during my legal career, ever treated me as Internet trolls routinely treat everyone with whom they disagree. I also was known, and appreciated, for treating the staff better than the other attorneys did. That was because I was from a working class background; my father was an electrician (after six years in the Coast Guard, before, during and after the war) who had grown up in poverty in rural Illinois’ coal country (my aforementioned great-grandfather and his brother were killed in a mine cave-in, on Monday, October 14, 1895), and had to drop out of school in the 8th grade, in order to go to work with his father, tarring roofs, during the Great Depression; my mother was an high-school graduate (Gary Horace Mann, five years after Tom Harmon graduated) who was working at U.S. Steel’s Gary Works, doing quality control on molten steal, until she got married, after the war.

    Were you always passive-aggressive and hypocritical, or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @D. K.


    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station.
     
    Judge, jury, and executioner. Although I'm sure you were careful of judges, and the likes of Mr. Gates.

    my mother was an high-school graduate
     
    A silly Britishism. Here we realize that "h" is a consonant, and treat it as such.

    ...or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?
     
    Says the king of affectation.

    My hunch is that either your alleged backstory is a fable, or you represent your mother's side of the family on steroids, and not so much your father's.

    Replies: @D. K.

  303. @Hibernian
    @D. K.

    Doubtless in the once affluent enclave of Miller, or else you're just making up the story out of whole cloth.

    Replies: @D. K.

    I was born in Methodist Hospital, as were all of my eight siblings (and Michael Jackson and all of his siblings), because my mother had watched her mother be killed at the Catholic hospital, in 1933, and I grew up in Brunswick, on the west side of Gary. I was in kindergarten during Brunswick Elementary School’s inaugural year. Alas . . .

    https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/nwitimes.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/c9/6c9d5b65-40bf-5182-bcd4-85ce914703ff/5947589c0a829.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C800

  304. @Alden
    @S Johnson

    The family were Greek Orthodox in Palestine. In Pasadena When they grew older, the Sirhan brothers including Sirhan became interested in other Christian religions. Sirhan bounced from 7th day Adventist to Rosicrucian.

    Replies: @S Johnson

    Thanks. Bouncing around from sect to sect (like Oswald defecting to the USSR, or the stoner European Muslims who become killers) is pretty common among politically motivated killers.

  305. @D. K.
    @Hibernian

    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station. Thankfully, no one, during my legal career, ever treated me as Internet trolls routinely treat everyone with whom they disagree. I also was known, and appreciated, for treating the staff better than the other attorneys did. That was because I was from a working class background; my father was an electrician (after six years in the Coast Guard, before, during and after the war) who had grown up in poverty in rural Illinois' coal country (my aforementioned great-grandfather and his brother were killed in a mine cave-in, on Monday, October 14, 1895), and had to drop out of school in the 8th grade, in order to go to work with his father, tarring roofs, during the Great Depression; my mother was an high-school graduate (Gary Horace Mann, five years after Tom Harmon graduated) who was working at U.S. Steel's Gary Works, doing quality control on molten steal, until she got married, after the war.

    Were you always passive-aggressive and hypocritical, or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?

    Replies: @Hibernian

    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station.

    Judge, jury, and executioner. Although I’m sure you were careful of judges, and the likes of Mr. Gates.

    my mother was an high-school graduate

    A silly Britishism. Here we realize that “h” is a consonant, and treat it as such.

    …or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?

    Says the king of affectation.

    My hunch is that either your alleged backstory is a fable, or you represent your mother’s side of the family on steroids, and not so much your father’s.

    • Replies: @D. K.
    @Hibernian

    I dare say that my comment history, here, gives more detail as to my "backstory" than anyone else's comment history at "The Unz Review" does about his-- indeed more than all of Steve's posts do about his own. Anyone who knew me would recognize my "backstory" instantly, just from reading this one comment thread. All you have to do to check is to call up the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and ask him whom his wife dated, before they became a couple. (I was not the only classmate whom she dated, before dating him, but I believe that I was the first!?! If you choose to call her directly, instead, feel free to ask her what she thought of me. She always seemed to have a much higher opinion of me than I did of myself, even after we had graduated and moved on to being lawyers. "Women...!").

    My first legal secretary went on to become the legal secretary for prominent Seattle attorney Jim Ellis, who went on to merge his firm with Mr. Gates', in 1990. I was introduced to Mr. Ellis, in 1987, by said legal secretary, when she and I became a couple, sometime after she had left my firm. I never met Mr. Gates, nor his son, but many of my friends and acquaintances obviously did.

    I am sorry that you do not like my English usage. I guess that I am, as you would say, "a heirloom" of another time and place. As for your hatred of us Slavs, thankfully my mother is no longer alive to hear it.

  306. @Hibernian
    @D. K.


    I treated everyone as they deserved to be treated, regardless of their respective station.
     
    Judge, jury, and executioner. Although I'm sure you were careful of judges, and the likes of Mr. Gates.

    my mother was an high-school graduate
     
    A silly Britishism. Here we realize that "h" is a consonant, and treat it as such.

    ...or did you take those traits on as affectations, at some point?
     
    Says the king of affectation.

    My hunch is that either your alleged backstory is a fable, or you represent your mother's side of the family on steroids, and not so much your father's.

    Replies: @D. K.

    I dare say that my comment history, here, gives more detail as to my “backstory” than anyone else’s comment history at “The Unz Review” does about his– indeed more than all of Steve’s posts do about his own. Anyone who knew me would recognize my “backstory” instantly, just from reading this one comment thread. All you have to do to check is to call up the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and ask him whom his wife dated, before they became a couple. (I was not the only classmate whom she dated, before dating him, but I believe that I was the first!?! If you choose to call her directly, instead, feel free to ask her what she thought of me. She always seemed to have a much higher opinion of me than I did of myself, even after we had graduated and moved on to being lawyers. “Women…!”).

    My first legal secretary went on to become the legal secretary for prominent Seattle attorney Jim Ellis, who went on to merge his firm with Mr. Gates’, in 1990. I was introduced to Mr. Ellis, in 1987, by said legal secretary, when she and I became a couple, sometime after she had left my firm. I never met Mr. Gates, nor his son, but many of my friends and acquaintances obviously did.

    I am sorry that you do not like my English usage. I guess that I am, as you would say, “a heirloom” of another time and place. As for your hatred of us Slavs, thankfully my mother is no longer alive to hear it.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS