The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Sarah Jeong: The Duke Lacrosse Team Was Guilty
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In 2014, years after DA Mike Nifong was convicted of trying to frame the Duke lacrosse team in 2006, Sarah Jeong apparently still believed in Crystal Mangum’s accusations, as Jeong mentioned in her opaque prose style in affirming Jackie Coakley’s credibility in the similar UVA rape hoax:

Okay!

So the Truth is out there about what really happened in the Duke lacrosse case. But They don’t want you know the Truth about what those evil yet sexy white male gang rapist stud muffins at Duke did. But on sultry summer nights Sarah can’t stop thinking about it.

White men: Sarah Jeong just can’t stop hating and dating them.

 
Hide 96 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. GW says:

    Without my glasses I had to squint to read this, but I think Steve’s found the NYT’s chink in the armor. It’s tough to believe, but with the hiring of Jeong the “paper of record” now has even more slant than it did just a few weeks ago. Once respectable, the Times hasn’t always been promoters of yellow journalism, but that appears to be changing.

    The paper is certainly going down a steep slope, and they’ve done zip to fix the problem. It appears to be swerving in and out of traffic with its mouth agape, angering decent motorists everywhere.

  2. (No, this isn’t the part where I link you to what really happened in those cases. Why would you care about what really happened, anyways?

    Spoken like a true modern journalist. She will be a perfect fit for the NYT team.

  3. It has occurred to me that all of this hub bub Jeong has been going on about is a projection of her own infuriating fantasy to be aggressively bedded by a white hunk.

  4. Sarah Jeong =

    Jar-nose hag.

    Rag-jeans ho.

    A j0hn rages.

  5. @GW

    but with the hiring of Jeong the “paper of record” now has even more slant than it did just a few weeks ago.

    I see what you did there.

    • Replies: @Russ
  6. Anonymous[241] • Disclaimer says:

    Has she ever said anything about Emma Sulkowicz? Or is a half-Asian fantasist going off the deep end after being jilted by a white guy too close to home?

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  7. Sarah Jeong: The gift to iSteve that keeps on giving!!

    • Replies: @res
  8. Anyone who knew anything about university life, about fraternities — and especially about Duke — knew, that that Mangum’s story was bogus. To be blunt: Why would an athlete, fit and presumably more popular than the average pre- or med-school Duke kid from New Jersey (most of whom are not protestants/catholics), want to “engage” with a low-class, messy stripper. Most lacrosse kids are from Long Island or other NE areas. We white dudes appropriated lacrosse from the then-natives.

    The Duke campus, town and area are full of willing, much more attractive women. Even with beer goggles… It’s been gentrified recently, but there are still “good” and “bad” areas.

  9. Clearly, it’s time to track down those guys and #metoo them!

  10. If Jeong decides to spend more time with her grievances, it won’t be directly related to anything conservatives have done other than bringing attention to her issues. Instead of approaching the opposition to Jeong as an 80-20 issue (i.e., reaching out to the 80% against the 20%), cons always have to make everything a con vs lib thing. As a result, they’re helping limit the opposition to those like her to 20% to 30% of the U.S. That’s good for their page views and selling herbal tonics, but it’s horrible for the USA and it won’t prevent future Jeongs.

    In case that’s a bit too convoluted, I want a big tent opposition to those like Jeong. Con leaders shrink the tent in order to get more page views and for other reasons. They in effect help those like Jeong by shrinking the opposition.

  11. Mr. Anon says:

    Apparently, Ms. Jeong doesn’t like the New York Times either:

    https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/08/03/new-york-times-bigot-sarah-jeong-repeatedly-trashed-the-new-york-times/

    Notajoke: I’m being forced to read Nicholas Kristof. This is the worst.

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 19, 2013

    i love how david brooks somehow managed to be infuriatingly bourgeois AND unbearably scoldy high brow about other people being bourgeois

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 13, 2015

    Brooks is an absolute nitwit tho

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 11, 2017

    I don’t feel safe in a country that is led by someone who takes Thomas Friedman seriously

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 23, 2013

    A just god would not allow Tom Friedman to keep talking.

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

    I have wept and I have prayed,
    I have prayed and I have wept,
    and Tom Friedman is somehow allowed to keep talking

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

    Hannah Rosin shatters ceiling by proving women writers can be as hackish as Tom Friedman, too

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 11, 2013

    Mind you, if I had a bajillion dollars, I’d buy the New York Times, just for the pleasure of firing Tom Friedman.

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 5, 2013

    Strange new respect.

  12. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    The problem is the Power allows her to shit on whites, but whites cannot shit back.

    Imagine a master who lets one dog attack the other dog but the other dog can’t do anything. So, it’s a one-sided attack. Jeong can shit on whites, but whites in globo-elite circles better not shit on her.

    Jewish Ruling Power says non-whites can bash white but not vice versa.

    Now, this is supposed to be premised on a Theory of Justice to redress past White Injustice to non-whites. So, colored dog can attack white dog cuz white dog was favored in the past.

    The problem with this line of argument is whites founded and made America. They deserve the most credit. They deserve blame too for certain wrongs, but far more credit.
    Sure, they favored whites in their white-made world, but they founded and made America, and therefore deserve most honor for the very existence of America.
    It’s not like all the world equally contributed to the making of America but then evil whites took the lions’s share of the credit, wealth, and power. No, whites almost singlehandedly made America though certain credit must be given to blacks in the slave era for providing raw labor.
    Most of the world had NOTHING to do with the making of America, so when non-whites come to the US and act like whites owe them something, that’s bogus.

    If anything, the fact that whites excluded non-whites from America in the past means that most non-whites around the world neither contributed to the making of America nor were oppressed by whites. How could non-whites have been oppressed by whites when they weren’t let into ‘racist’ white America? If they were oppressed, it was by native rulers or imperialists, European or otherwise.

    But for some reason, whatever wrongs whites may have done to blacks or American Indians are to be associated with ALL non-whites. Following this logic, Nepalese can come to the US and bitch about victim status because whites oppressed non-white American Indians and blacks in the past. As Nepalese are non-white, they can claim the victimhood of Others. The notion of People of Color has melted all non-white identities into one shared victim camp. It’s big tent victimhood racket.

    Now, Seong is a Korean. If her kind has any beef with the US, it should be American support of Japanese colonization in Korea prior to US-Japan split. Also, US was instrumental in dividing Korea(with USSR), setting grounds for Korean War, and raining bombs on the country. But that is a specific gripe that should be handled as a particular case. It is unrelated to whatever gripes others may have against America.
    Whatever the case, Koreans cannot claim victimhood IN the US since they are late-comers, and they came when white bigotry has all but vanished in America. For Koreans in the US to associate themselves with whatever whites did to blacks or Indians is totally bogus.

    Also, the POC vs White dichotomy not only sacralizes all non-whites regardless of their experience but vilifies all whites regardless of their own history. Are Polish-Americans who never owned slaves and who have a long history of occupation under Prussian and Russian imperialism also part of this ‘white privilege’? The main victims of Nazi ‘white supremacism’ were other whites, esp in Poland, Ukraine, and Russia. The most extreme form of white supremacism begat a war that killed 50 million whites.

    But POC vs white dichotomy allows ALL non-whites(even Hispanic whites) to share in the combined victimhood of ALL non-whites and vilifies ALL whites for the actions of certain white groups.

  13. inertial says:

    Condensed Sarah Jeong: “My feelz > hard evidence.” How so very female.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  14. Tony says:

    What about Tawana Brawley. Surely she thinks that Brawley was telling the truth.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  15. Russ says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I lack access to the LOL button; permit me to express the sentiment here.

  16. J.Ross says: • Website

    Is there anyone other than white people and a few Jews who wants a post-racial society? Everyone else will be seduced by the possible short term gains of tribalism. Tribalism has already won, and we must prepare by learning how to be tribalist ourselves (witness this thread’s reminder: your color is your guilt to outsiders), but we should still try to retain a racially neutral society for as long as possible because of the inherent advantages. The key will be understanding that it’s a withdrawal and not a counterattack. Make the withdrawal take as long as possible, but don’t imagine we can go back. The rules for jury selection would be completely overhauled if our legal system wasn’t already broken and in a self-destructive cycle.

    Speaking of Jeong, the NYT had a smug line during the Roseanne firing about what tolerating racist tweets costs us. Because they don’t understand how the internet works (“RUSSIAN HACKERS!!”) they have censored that line, and replaced it with one that makes them look less thoughtless.
    It sure would be divisive if people made a point of remembering what the NYT wants forgotten.
    The original line:

    “The network’s decision to cancel ‘Roseanne’ over a racist comment will cost it. But when people decide to let racism slide, it costs the rest of us.”

    The “updated” text, fresh from the Ministry of Truth:

    “The ‘Roseanne’ decision, on the other hand, will come at a price for ABC — and like any such step, will have collateral costs.”

    Cut to video of election-fixer, Pakistani intelligence asset, and sister of the prosecutor assigned to investigate her (seriously all of this is noncontroversially true, the media doesn’t report it more widely because it’s just that Russian hackers are so darn fascinating), Deborah Wasserman-Schulz, threatening a police officer (she did this on video at a public hearing, this actually happened): “I would think there would be consequences.”

    http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/181076362

    Is there anyone who loves censorship more than a mainstream journalist?

  17. Anonymous[398] • Disclaimer says:

    Here’s an angle to the Duke lacrosse case I think is orthogonal to the hoax and the hoax-busting:

    my sister graduated from Duke in 2004. She was neither surprised by the lacrosse case nor sympathetic towards their actual innocence.

    I found that disturbing and I’m not defending her *position*. But I am interested in why she had that position. My sister is a serious medical researcher, not an SJW with some rhetorical job. She is an attractive blonde woman who was a member of one of the socially elite sororities at Duke. She is exactly the type of girl who would have dated some lacrosse guy going to Wall Street–but she didn’t because she was disgusted by the social scene at 21st century college. Her view was just that she knew plenty of girls who had been treated horribly by lacrosse guys and everyone knew their reputation so eff ‘em.

    This is not an autistic legal argument in a vacuum. She wasn’t saying she knew of specific violations of specific legal codes. Just that they were guys who bullied/charmed their way into girls and then threw away those girls like garbage and humiliated them in social conversation with their teammates, etc.

    That’s not a crime. But maybe it should tell us something about our society that people like my sister, a WASP from a “core four” sorority had zero interest in discovering the truth of this specific case because they already knew them socially. If the girls they socialized with wouldn’t defend them, I guess that’s why Stephen Miller was the only one left who would

  18. AndrewR says:
    @GW

    Agree. This witch’s hiring is actually a wonderful thing for us normal people whom the NYT wants dead or enslaved. The Salonification of the NYT is all but complete. Decent, sane people everywhere will no longer be able to deny the malice and mendacity of these monsters.

  19. AndrewR says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    If I had to guess, I’d say she was aggressively bedded by multiple white hunks in college, none of whom called her the next day, hence her sapphic rage.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  20. AndrewR says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Well, even broken clocks are right twice daily. What’s amazing is how stupid the NYT editors are. Even I had not thought they were stupid enough to hire someone who had directed so much vitriol at them. This is some next-level idiocy, real talk.

  21. @Anonymous

    Mattress Girl would probably be the US Ambassador to the UN right now if Hillary had won.

  22. Dan Hayes says:

    Steve,

    The underlying reason why the New York Times feels free to act this way is its many newly acquired internet subscribers who have rescued The Old Grey Lady from what was imminent financial oblivion. The NYT ‘s new niche is to satisfy these newly acquired SJW’s. Think of it as an upscale version of the soon to-be-departed New York Daily News in its rages against The Orange Headed Ogre.

  23. @Anonymous

    The Dupont U. lacrosse team is briefly mentioned in Wolfe’s “I Am Charlotte Simmons” as more fratty than the frattiest frat.

    • Replies: @Polymath
    , @Anonymous
  24. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Let’s follow the logic of POC vs POW(people of whiteness).

    Logic: Seong is yellow, therefore POC. Blacks are POC and were slaves in the US under whites. Since Seong being yellow makes her POC, she can claim black victimhood as her own and trash talk like some mean nasty biatch. And since slave owners in the US were white, ALL whites in the US must share the blame. All whites, meaning even white immigrants who came AFTER end of slavery and white who never set foot in the South.

    Following this logic, Mongols were yellow and they invaded white Russia. So, all yellows, including Koreans, must feel shame for Mongol yellow terror against whites. And that means ALL whites can claim victimhood under yellows. Since Mongols were yellow, all yellows must share blame. Since Russians were white, all whites can claim victimhood at hands of yellows.
    And since Japanese are yellow and attacked Pearl Harbor and mostly killed whites, all yellows must take blame for that dastardly deed. Koreans and Chinese are also to blame for Japan’s aggression against white because they are yellow too.

    Hey, this game is getting fun. They say Moors were black, and Moors invaded Spain and ruled for centuries. So, all blacks all over the world must feel guilty, and all whites can claim victimhood at hands of blacks.

    Hey, it’s all matter of context.

  25. @Mr. Anon

    “Strange new respect.”

    LOL!

    Yeah, it’s amazing: for all her lunatic maundering, she’s actually right about the Times‘s writers.

    • Replies: @meh
  26. @GW

    Aren’t you being a little flip with your marginally scrutable references to members of the epicanthic fold?

    Nip it in the bud, right now. It isn’t cool[ie, fair].

    • Replies: @GW
  27. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Tony

    These people effortfully maintain an alternate history. It’s not Jeong misremembering something. It’s the perpetual construction of a flammable wicker Haman. One of the things that strengthened my ideology coming from being a leftist was looking up all the racist horror stories that are a living gospel to lefties and finding that in every case they’re lying or omiting a mountain of context. At no point were Klansmen exonerated, but neither is the leftist conclusion that everybody from a certain region is a Klansman. For a person who hasn’t gone back over their living gospel of evil white people, all those monster stories are still true.
    Ask yourself how often have the mass media mentioned the knockout game or Colin Flaherty’s reporting in the constant race issue reporting of late, or how often they have mentioned the assassination of police officers in describing BLM, or how often they included Soros’ sponsorship of BLM in describing foreign actors trying to divide our society.

  28. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    I am convinced some Jewish editor just decided in the interview that he wanted to have sex with her, and that’s why the Times is digging in their guns about hiring her.

    Dare I suggest she’s supposed to show up in whip and high heels, and give the editor a few whacks on his bad, bad, white male back as he grovels?

    • Replies: @dr kill
  29. Hunsdon says:
    @GW

    2018 is the best year ever.

    • Replies: @Anonym
  30. The best outcome possible is for more and more of her childish, moronic tweets to surface and the NYT to have to double down in defending her. They kind of have to now that “the right” is after her.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
  31. Mr. Blank says:

    So basically everything I’ve read by this woman is the sort of “journalism” that can be cranked out by the yard by any reasonably sharp liberal arts grad who’s learned to parrot their woke professors. I’m not seeing any groundbreaking stuff.

    Has she ever done anything like, you know, real journalist-type work? Or is being a cranky tumblr blogger who checks the right boxes all it takes to get a spot on the prestigious NYT editorial board these days?

    Of all the dystopias that could have come to pass, rule by a class of navel-gazing grinds with awesome resumes and zero real-world accomplishments seems about the dullest.

    There was a time within living memory when nobody of such meager apparent accomplishments as this Sarah Jeong chick would have ever been considered for such a prestigious post — any person, even a (shudder) evil white male would have to be pretty exceptional for the NYT to even let them past the front desk. These days, it’s becoming rarer and rarer to come across elites who genuinely strike you as the finest people our country can produce.

    I think a pretty reasonable rule of thumb about how to determine if your civilization is in decline is when you stop marveling at the backwards ways of your ancestors and start to wonder how they accomplished such incredible feats. It feels like we’ve already passed that point in the West.

    • Agree: Desiderius
  32. GW says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Yes. Like Jeong, I stewed the pooch.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  33. @Johnny Smoggins

    Here’s a long Twitter thread doing just that:

  34. Anonymous[441] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Every rightthinking handshakeworthy nondeplorable knows with absolute certainty that of course there are witches and actually a whole witchcraft epidemic(!).

    That none can ever be found, to these Global-Witching conspiracy theorists, in and of itself reinforces and confirms [their religious faith in the existence of] the extraordinary power, influence, and sophistication of the witches, which in and of itself directly necessitates the need for more witchhunts-witchhunting-witchfinders, extreme vigilance, discipline, punishment.

    Talk about irony, after convicting all Duke fratboys and fratboy sympathizers and dispatching them en masse to the waste of Alaska’s North Slope, Sarah Jeong would have all white Duke sorority members subjected to denunciation for the unforgivable crime of Becky Deviationism – Бецкы Девиатионисм – wreckers the lot of them!

  35. Polynikes says:
    @GW

    If I had a “lol” button, it would be pushed

  36. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Yes, I also know sophisticated, intelligent people who believe every single hate/race hoax that comes down the pike as though it were gospel religion. Because it is religion, and they’re busy professionals who don’t have time for the details, so they let the MSM do the heavy lifting, and they believe the MSM, because only racist crackpots are skeptical–the MSM tells them so.

    Also, you appear to be a concern troll.

  37. Polymath says:
    @Steve Sailer

    It’s awesome how prescient Wolfe was. That novel came out 2 years before the Duke rape hoax, and his first novel came out literally the month before the Tawana Brawley rape hoax brought his characters to life in the persons of Messrs. Maddox and Mason Esq. and the Rev. Mr. Sharpton.

    Yes, it would be good to see what Sarah J. said about Emma S. They’re a good pair. Both are just hot enough to sleep with alpha white guys but not hot enough to keep them.

  38. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @GW

    You guys are seriously amazing. Especially the OP, which I had to read a number of times.

  39. AndrewR says:
    @GW

    Wow I finally see what you did there. I’m crying

  40. Thomas says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Between these and her continuing to take the side of Crystal Mangum and Jackey Coakley (the latter of which led to a significant journalistic scandal and $5 million in damages paid out by Rolling Stone), I would be willing to believe whoever might have first mentioned her as a prospect for the Times meant it as a joke or just wanted to see how far it would go.

  41. anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    You get the feeling she’s just an angry person. I suspect there are some family issues, but that’s only a hunch.

  42. Rod1963 says:
    @Anonymous

    What you described is a replay of high school where the jocks use the cheerleaders as toilets and dump them.

    Those girls should have known better than to spread their legs for some sleazy, good looking jock. High school should have taught them that these guys are scum.

    And yes the fact that the girls they “dated” wouldn’t defend them says a lot of things about and it’s all bad.

    The fact that the Lacrosse team hired a low rent, foul tempered black stripper kind of says it all about their character. They had none and deserved the pipe ride they got for being pigs.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    , @Mr. Anon
    , @Art Deco
  43. El Dato says:

    Hot McDonalds coffee is racist?

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @anon
  44. @MikeatMikedotMike

    It is pretty much an established fact that Asian females are strongly attracted to white males.

  45. Anonym says:
    @Hunsdon

    At the very least 2018 is the greatest year ever.

  46. @El Dato

    Hot McDonalds coffee is racist?

    The truth is out there.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Reg Cæsar
  47. Drake says:
    @Anonymous

    The Duke women’s lacrosse team supported the accused players.

    http://www.espn.com/ncaa/news/story?id=2456262

    Duke women’s lacrosse to wear ‘innocent’ sweatbands
    May 24, 2006

    Associated Press

    DURHAM, N.C. — In a show of solidarity with the Duke University’s men’s lacrosse team, members of the school’s women’s team plan to wear sweatbands with the word “Innocent” written on them.

    The university canceled the rest of the season for the highly ranked men’s team because of a woman’s complaint she was sexually assaulted in March at a team party where she had been hired to perform as an exotic dancer.

    The women’s plan to wear sweatbands on their arms or legs was reported Wednesday by The Herald-Sun of Durham. The teams plays Northwestern in the NCAA semifinals Friday.

    “We want to win a national championship for ourselves but definitely also for the university and the men’s team,” junior Leigh Jester told the newspaper. “They don’t really have a chance to play their season, which is a shame.”

  48. It will be interesting to see if Jeong has the stomach to defend herself against this onslaught. I could see her having a nervous breakdown and the NY Times quietly retiring her (after taking a few more shots at Red State America first though).

  49. Tulip says:

    This is getting cruel. Sarah Jeong is obviously either an airhead or a soviet-era mouthpiece with zero integrity willing to give the party line no matter how patently bullshit it is.

    But we knew that–the question is the peculiar decision of her employer. Is this actually going to help the NYT’s effectuate its business plan?

  50. dr kill says:
    @Anon

    That’s it exactly, she reminds me of Lucy Liu in the movie Payback, where she’s beating Gibson’s old criminal partner. Hahaha.

  51. Anon[209] • Disclaimer says:

    White men: Sarah Jeong just can’t stop hating and dating them.

    Actually, her fling Weev is a Jew. I’d be shocked if many of the ‘Whites’ she dated weren’t.

  52. Anonymous[304] • Disclaimer says:

    Well, she may be a hateful nutball, but Brian Schatz seconded that emotion — Old Man Civility hisself, LOL

    By late in the week I expect DJT will clarify that veteran ink-stained wretch and next MacArthur Genius grantee Jeong, for whom Elizabeth Warren will have requested a Secret Service detail, is not an Enemy of the People.

    Doesn’t her whole feed & journalistic clippings history remind you of some amateur casual who entered a poetry slam? Next she should do one of those college-student forensic debate competitions

  53. @AndrewR

    I’d say more like passively bedded by lots of timid soyboys, who definitely didn’t call her the next day, because they were afraid to, hence her clear frustration. She wants to be split like wood, and hasn’t had it yet.

  54. Jack D says:
    @Anonymous

    Your sister wasn’t obligated to do anything either way regarding the Duke lacrosse players, but to my mind, she is accusing them of being cads and jerks, while Nifong and the campus mob were accusing them of being rapists and wanted to send them to prison for decades. 20 years in the State Penitentiary (I’m sure they would have been real popular among the black inmates as the crackers who raped the sista) doesn’t seem to me to be an appropriate penalty for being a jerk.

    • Agree: Twinkie
  55. anon[120] • Disclaimer says:
    @El Dato

    Not if it’s black.

  56. Twinkie says:
    @Anonymous

    Her view was just that she knew plenty of girls who had been treated horribly by lacrosse guys and everyone knew their reputation so eff ‘em.

    How about this? Ladies, be chaste and wait until marriage. During the courting process, you’ll figure out if the guy in question is a jerk or not. Poor impulse control and fornication have never been safe for women, physically or mentally.

    As for this Jeong character, really New York Times? You couldn’t find a smart leftist for the job? She is an imbecile.

    • Agree: MBlanc46, David In TN
  57. Clyde says:

    White men: Sarah Jeong just can’t stop hating and dating them.

    Born in Korea and inflicted on America. Her highness is a very mixed bag when it comes to whites. She can always move back home where Koreans rule, what’s stopping her? In photos I see she looks normal, long haired and nice NE Asian in some, while lesbian bizarre in some. Bottom line is that due to graduating from Harvard she received better admittance to liberal media platforms. So she gets to spill her (very conflicted & confused) guts publicly. She get to act out her internal drama in public. What is No Biggie Reveal here>>>>> That she has a love-hate affair and affairs with white men. As Mark Steyn terms this — “Fraternizing with the enemy” Also with her own bi-sexuality. With white girls, Asian girls?
    She is so nutty she probably has a love hate affair with being Korean.

  58. Clyde says:
    @GW

    You are more despicable than the Duke Lacrosse team :)

  59. @Anonymous

    Did your sister consider black basketball and football players angels compared to the lacrosse players?

    FWIW from my college days long ago, many students looked down on “the jocks.”

  60. So is Sarah Jeong “dating” lots of Jewish men? I wish these East Asian shiksas would leave our Jewish men alone.

  61. Bugg says:

    Broken clocks, twice each day, and whatnot. Starting to warm up to the gal if she can get those 2 not typical whiter persons tossed.

    “i love how david brooks somehow managed to be infuriatingly bourgeois AND unbearably scoldy high brow about other people being bourgeois

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 13, 2015

    Brooks is an absolute nitwit tho

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 11, 2017

    I don’t feel safe in a country that is led by someone who takes Thomas Friedman seriously

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) December 23, 2013

    A just god would not allow Tom Friedman to keep talking.

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013

    I have wept and I have prayed,
    I have prayed and I have wept,
    and Tom Friedman is somehow allowed to keep talking

    — sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) September 8, 2013″

  62. Jack D says:
    @Rod1963

    The Duke case is ancient history now (has it really been a dozen years?) and there’s no need to relitigate it. Justice for the most part won – Nifong is disbarred, Crystal Mangum is in jail for an unrelated murder, the boys received rich legal settlements appropriate for the damage that had been done to them. But in fact the boys (racists that they were) specifically ordered a white stripper but were sent a very black and very drunk/drugged one instead and that is where their troubles began.

    Now maybe men of high character should not order strippers (actually I think it was kind of an old-fashioned gesture – modern hipsters would not order strippers unless it was in an ironic way) but under the laws of N. Carolina this was a legal form of entertainment and feminists will tell you that it offers one of the few opportunities available for non-college women to earn a good income.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
  63. ic1000 says:
    @Anonymous

    One of the lesser ironies of your sister’s “serves em right” stance is that the players charged by the race-baiting DA and righteously hounded by the prestige media weren’t known as cads. As Crystal began her druggy performance, one of the framed players told his girlfriend he was grabbing a cab home. Not that that ironclad alibi helped him much.

    • Replies: @ThirdWorldSteveReader
  64. Jeong doesn’t BELIEVE the Duke LaX players raped that woman, or that Jackie was raped. She’s bald-faced lying about it even after everyone knows the truth.

  65. I wonder if the NYT’s token Korean racist is familiar with Crystal Mangum’s history besides her rape hoax. Those interested in more detail can find it in Wikipedia, but she is currently doing 14-18 for second degree murder and has a very extensive list of offenses, including many before her rape hoax.

    Jeong isn’t just a racist and a bad writer. She is ignorant. She’s an Asian Tennessee Coates. We have a coalition of the fringe opinionators race to the bottom.

  66. Mr. Anon says:
    @Rod1963

    The fact that the Lacrosse team hired a low rent, foul tempered black stripper kind of says it all about their character. They had none and deserved the pipe ride they got for being pigs.

    As I recall, they thought they were going to get a white stripper. When the stipper that showed up turned out to be black, unattractive, and high, they sent her back. Actually, I imagine it was the unattractive part that was the decisive factor. If she had looked like Aisha Tyler or Zoe Saldana, they probably wouldn’t have had any complaints.

    Sure, they were probably pigs. A lot of frat/jock types are. But I’ll still side with them over SJWs just about anyday. The Duke Lacrosse case was a smear and a show-trial, and should be remembered as such.

  67. Art Deco says:
    @Rod1963

    Of the three men accused, one left the room and never saw the show. A second can be see on time-stamped photos looking less than amused. He called a cab and left. The first public sign that the case was an utter fraud was a security cam video that showed him at an ATM down the street during the time Crystal Gail Mangum was supposedly being ‘raped’. The third had had the same girlfriend since junior high school.

  68. Art Deco says:
    @Jack D

    Justice for the most part won – Nifong is disbarred,

    Actually, no one in city government from the city manager down to the nominal supervisors of Sgt. Gottlieb and Detective Himan lost their job. There was no commission of inquiry about how such a travesty could happen. The prosecutor who was scheduled to be Nifong’s second chair at the trial was elected District Attorney. No one at Duke University responsible for institutional misconduct was discharged and some of the LaX players’ most vicious detractors were granted promotions or honorifics. Only one professor who’d signed a public appeal denouncing the LaX team explicitly retracted it. The only people who subsequently left their jobs (given whatever incentive to do so) were Sgt. Gottlieb, Det. Himan, Tara Levicy (a nurse at Duke Medical Center who was unwittingly responsible for setting the ball rolling), Dr. Brian Meehan of the DNA laboratory used as a contractor, and Nifong’s staff gumshoe Linwood Wilson. Meehan and Wilson were the only ones publicly and explicitly dismissed and Wilson was the only one other than Nifong who had subsequent legal problems. No one at The New York Times or the Durham Herald-Sun lost their position for gross journalistic malpractice. Det. Himan was probably innocent of any misconduct, Dr. Meehan – who ultimately spilled the beans when under oath – was likely anxious about retaliation by the prosecutors’ office, and Levicy appears to have been an ideologue / dingbat. Other than Nifong, the only people held accountable were the least influential.

    • Agree: ic1000
    • Replies: @Jack D
  69. @Anonymous

    Those bitches CHOSE those men, knowing what they were. It is THEIR fault. Stop white knighting.

  70. Art Deco says:
    @Anonymous

    She was neither surprised by the lacrosse case nor sympathetic towards their actual innocence.

    Your sister’s a moral idiot and shouldn’t be put in charge of anyone.

  71. @ic1000

    There is a pattern in this sort of witch hunt, in which it’s always the weak-looking witch that gets the pitchforks. The townsfolk are angry at the witches, but they don’t dare to attack the tough-looking ones that may fight back.

    So when Miss Hoaxie and her media friends needed to find a target, of course they didn’t go for the actual pervs who could actually be willing to harm her.

  72. Jack D says:
    @Art Deco

    There’s no perfect justice in the world. Most Nazi war criminals escape prosecution. SS Sturmbannführer Wernher von Braun was given a position of honor in the US when he deserved the gallows (20,000 dead at Mittelbau-Dora). But compared to what could have happened (innocent men sent to prison) it turned out OK.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    , @Mr. Anon
  73. @Anonymous

    I understand where you coming from. Public image matters, and public image depends partially on private morality. I sure would prefer a world where these boys and the sorority girls who criticize them while being little better lived more edificating lives, as this would be both beneficial to them and inhibitory of scamers like that black stripper.

    But I’m going to join the chorus and say that your sister should know that “being a jerk” ≠ “being not worth of a fair trial or a fair evaluation by their peers”. IIRC it was one of your lawmen who once aptly said that the judicial system was not made to only defend Snow White.

  74. CCZ says:

    Don’t we all have to wait for “Technology Editor” Sarah Jeong’s Tweet before this story is confirmed? Otherwise isn’t it just the words of a bunch of “dumbass” white men.

    Where is Space Force When You Need Them? Scientists Tweet Incident; Air Force is Quiet.
    Report: Meteor Made 2.1 Kiloton Explosion Over Air Force Space Command Base Thule, Greenland.

    A curious and credible Tweet from the Director of the Nuclear Information Project for the Federation of American Scientists, Hans Kristensen, on August 1, 2018 claimed that a: “Meteor explodes with 2.1 kilotons force 43 km above missile early warning radar at Thule Air Base.” He noted that the base, “Correctly concluded it was not a Russian first strike.”

    NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory did provide a Tweet with a screenshot of data showing of an object of unspecified size traveling at 24.4 Kilometers per second (about 54,000 MPH or Mach 74)…almost directly over Thule, Greenland.

    https://theaviationist.com/2018/08/03/report-meteor-made-2-1-kiloton-explosion-over-air-force-space-command-base-thule-greenland/

  75. Anon[358] • Disclaimer says:

    “under the laws of N. Carolina this was a legal form of entertainment and feminists will tell you that it offers one of the few opportunities available for non-college women to earn a good income.”

    Dang, show your age why don’t you? Modern feminists under 40 probably would NOT say that at all. They’d say these laws are sexist and somehow part of a nebulous conspiracy called “the Patriarchy.” If anyone disagrees, please look into bizarre feminist complaints like “mansplaining” (when a man tells an insecure woman something she doesn’t already know) or “manspreading” (when an insecure woman who can’t get a man becomes obsessed by a man’s genitals and starts to obsessively stare at and record men’s crotches in public) or “the male gaze” (when an unattractive female imagines herself to be the center of the male attention she craves but then realizes no one really cares after all).

  76. @Jack D

    Yeah, but all those enterprising “Nazi Hunters” did get the Saturn 5 rocket developer Arthur Rudolph shipped back to the Fatherland where he died at the age of 89.

    That’s how we treat US citizens who contribute.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/03/us/arthur-rudolph-89-developer-of-rocket-in-first-apollo-flight.html

  77. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    The term is People of Light, my man. People of Light.

  78. RW says:

    Your sister’s logic has led to mass racial and ethnic conflict many many times throughout history. Tell her that this is why the concept of the individual is so important. The mainstream left are paranoid wolves.

  79. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    She wasn’t saying she knew of specific violations of specific legal codes. Just that they were guys who bullied/charmed their way into girls and then threw away those girls like garbage

    This is pretty vague stuff. I think you or she needs to come with some details to gain credibility.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  80. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    The truth is out there.

    What does this mean?

  81. @inertial

    Condensed Sarah Jeong: “My feelz > hard evidence.” How so very female.

    If I wanted a nutty SJW chick to feel my hard evidence, I think I’d prefer Donna Zuckerberg. That cute little facial asterism speaks to the Alaska in me.

  82. @Steve Sailer

    Hot McDonalds coffee is racist?

    The truth is out there.

    I appreciate McD’s hyperthermal coffee. It’s still warm after putting a half-dozen creamers into it.

  83. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jack D

    There’s no perfect justice in the world. Most Nazi war criminals escape prosecution. SS Sturmbannführer Wernher von Braun was given a position of honor in the US when he deserved the gallows (20,000 dead at Mittelbau-Dora). But compared to what could have happened (innocent men sent to prison) it turned out OK.

    A ridiculous assertion. Wernher von Braun wasn’t calling the shots; Himmler was. He was an SS major in about the same capacity that the average honorary doctorate recipient has a Ph.D. von Braun was no more responsible for the deaths at Mittelbau-Dora than any given german train dispatcher.

    Von Braun, by inadvertantly fooling Hitler and the german military establishment into squandering vast resources on a militarily useless weapon probably helped shorten the war by months, if not years.

  84. @Anon

    Following this logic, Mongols were yellow and they invaded white Russia. So, all yellows, including Koreans, must feel shame for Mongol yellow terror against whites. And that means ALL whites can claim victimhood under yellows. Since Mongols were yellow, all yellows must share blame. Since Russians were white, all whites can claim victimhood at hands of yellows.

    Mongols weren’t yellow. Why do idiots on this website’s comment sections keep spouting this nonsense? Is it the same group of perverse trolls using alt axxounts? The historical record has always been than Genghis Khan’s Borjigin clan, a.k.a the grey eyed clan, was white. And now there is irrefutable DNA-evidence that the Borjigin Mongol clan which was the founding stock of the Mongol empire, was genealogically Caucasoid.

    http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161622

    Although many regard the portrait at the National Palace Museum in Taipei, Taiwan, as the depiction most closely resembles Genghis Khan, all existing portraits, including this one, are essentially arbitrary interpretations of Genghis Khan’s appearance by historians living generations after Genghis Khan’s era [2, 6]. Although the factual nature of the statement is controversial, Persian historian Rashid-al-Din reported in his “Jami’s al-tawarikh” written at the start of the 14th century that most Borjigin ancestors of Genghis Khan were tall, long-bearded, red-haired, and bluish green-eyed, suggesting that the Genghis Khan’s male lineage had some Caucasoid-specific genetic features [44]. He also said that Genghis Khan looked just like his ancestors, but Kublai Khan, his grandson, did not inherit his ancestor’s red hair, implying that the addition of Mongoloid-specific alleles for determining hair color to the genetic makeup of Genghis Khan’s Borjigin clan was probably from the grandmother or mother of Kublai Khan, that is, the wife or daughter-in-law of Genghis Khan.

    “On” and “gud” from Ongud mean West and plural in ancient Altaic language, respectively, implying that the Ongud is a tribe from Western Asia. In fact, the ancestors of the Ongud are the Shato Turks of the Western Göktürks Khaganate [45, 46]; they moved to Eastern Xinjiang in the 7th century, and were scattered over Northern China and Inner Mongolia in the 9th century [47]. In the Mongolian era, many Ongud peoples were resettled in Khorazm of Western Central Asia, as governors for the Golden Horde Dynasty, and eventually formed part of the Kazakhs and the Mughals [44]. In addition, they also fell under the Chagatai Khanate that was ruled by Chagatai Khan and his descendants and/or successors and extended from the Southern part of the Aral Sea to the Altai Mountains [48]. These suggest the possibility that the Ongud clan may be anthropologically Caucasoid rather than Mongoloid, according to their geographical origin. Therefore, the male bodies carrying R1b-M343 (prevalent in Western Europe) from Tavan Tolgoi, which was located within the territory of the Ongud Kingdom during the early Mongolian era, could be related to the Ongud male lineage, implying that Tavan Tolgoi bodies are genealogically Caucasoid

    Stop calling the Mongols “yellow” just because people living in Mongolia today (who have no connection whatsoever to Genghis Khan or the Ongud descended Mongols) look like East Asians. It is such an embarrassment. Genghis Khan was a red headed blue eyed white man and so were his allies. And they did not bring terror to Russia, that is a bullshit Enlightenment idea. Here is what Mongols brought to Russia (and please remember “Russia” at that time was a non-white Finno-Ugric shithole):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan_and_the_Making_of_the_Modern_World

    Genghis Khan was one of the best things to ever happen to the world, all those people he destroyed were decadent and deserved what they got. Yet the Finno-Ugric Rus weren’t even destroyed; just left alone.

    • Replies: @Anon
  85. anonymous[177] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    not really.

    the responses to my post were predictable but real weak.

    my sister didn’t accuse any lacrosse player of anything, she didn’t write an article about lacrosse players, nothing. I’m talking about why she just didn’t care *when asked*

    As for details, she could provide them. You’ll just have to take that on faith since I’m an anonymous internet poster asserting the fact that my sister was in that social scene. I mean, I could be making that up, but then who cares? There’s nothing to argue about; you either take the facts as given or you don’t.

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
  86. Anonymous[177] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer

    I myself was in a “super frat”–the rugby team at New England school where football wasn’t a real thing.

    I wish I still had access to that email list for all of your senile boomer commenters who don’t believe their boys at elite schools are saying and doing disgusting things to their daughters.

    yes, there were plenty of jokes about spiking the punch so they could rape girls. one time our social director said to a couple of guys, “hey, shut the fuck up. I don’t care if you drug these girls but people are going to be here soon so quit joking about it either way.”

    there was constant dehumanization of Steve’s readers daughters on the email chain. “Look, were having a mixer with sorority and they’re REALLY SERIOUS about us not inviting other girls. I know these Jew sluts from Long island aren’t the prettiest but they are easy, so just man up and let’s do this.”

    Is this really any way for our society to operate?

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    , @Ben tillman
  87. Anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    It would be interesting to get a spreadsheet with all the Wayback posts and indications of which ones were deleted from the current blog, and look for patterns. Extra credit: Try to figure out the dates of the deletions based on the Wayback crawls.

    A Filipino on Upwork would do this for $20.

    Here’s the non-deleted stuff:

    https://sarahjeong.net/sitemap.xml

  88. MBlanc46 says:
    @Anonymous

    If course it’s not the way for our society to operate. It didn’t used to be this way. Sure, young men have always been obsessed with sex (that’s why there are people), and they’ve always talked crudely about women amongst themselves. But they almost never got to act on their fantasies. Women wouldn’t let them. If you ever wanted to get anywhere with a woman, you at least pretended that what was constantly on your mind was the furthest thing from your mind. Then, in the 1960s, women decided that they wanted sexual freedom. They got it. We’re now discovering that sexual freedom for women and civilization are inversely related.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  89. Anonymous[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @MBlanc46

    While there is something to that, if it were strictly true Pakistan and Saudi Arabia would be great nations, and Switzerland a shithole.

  90. @Anonymous

    Right. This is the one point where ideology trumps facts for many iSteve commenters. We had this kind of stuff at my Ivy League school, especially the frat associated with one particular all-white team (not hockey or lacrosse).

  91. @anonymous

    I understand. A Duke alumna whom I went to law school with told me of something terrible at the Duke chapter what would generally be considered the top fraternity in the South.

    Does “core four” mean the Wheatons, Theta, and Tri Delt?

  92. meh says:
    @Almost Missouri

    Yeah, it’s amazing: for all her lunatic maundering, she’s actually right about the Times‘s writers.

    She’s more right than she knows, since she now works for the NY Times, as well. She’s in like company.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.