The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Sarah Jeong: Haven Monahan Is GUILTY!
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From Conservative Cartel:

FLASHBACK: NEW YORK TIMES BIGOT SARAH JEONG DEFENDED UVA RAPE HOAXER
Posted by Tom Ciccotta | Aug 3, 2018 | Top Stories | 0 |

Flashback: New York Times Bigot Sarah Jeong Defended UVA Rape Hoaxer

OLD TWEETS FROM NEW YORK TIMES BIGOT SARAH JEONG REVEAL A LONG-WINDED DEFENSE OF THE ROLLING STONE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA RAPE HOAXER.

In 2014, Rolling Stone magazine published the story of University of Virginia student Jackie Coakley, who claimed to have been ganged raped by several of her peers as part of a fraternity initiation rite. As the piece of Jackie’s story began to crumble, recent New York Times hire and notorious bigot Sarah Jeong, who recently came under fire for her history of anti-white tweets, aggressively came to her defense.

Of her many tweets on December 5, 2014 (a week after I blogged about it) defending the veracity of the Rolling Stone fraternity initiation gang rape on broken glass hoax, here’s a good one:

Screenshot 2018-08-03 16.00.38

Quite a track record …

Seriously, though, how unusual is Sarah Jeong’s race/sex animus for a salaried journalist in 2018? Not very …

Jeong appears to have deleted a longer post from three days later on how we must believe Jackie. From Autostraddle on December 10, 2014:

This Might Be The Most Important Moment Ever To Fight Rape On Campus
BY AUDREY
DECEMBER 10, 2014
10:09AM PDT

… As feminists and anti-rape activists, we must try to process the horror of what happened to Jackie and what happens to so many people so often — this stunning writing by Sarah Jeong is one place to start.

https://sarahjeong.net/2014/12/08/something-terrible-happened-to-jackie/

Fortunately, the Wayback Machine archive has it:

https://archive.is/olTrq

Something Terrible Happened to Jackie

 
Hide 42 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Her truth is stranger than fiction.

  2. Entirely predictable.

    In a bizarro dimension of inverted faux Christianity, I would also predict that Jeong is that reality’s version of Simon, easing the burden of rape culture messiah Emma Sulkowicz at the 5th station of the mattress.

    • Replies: @ThirdWorldSteveReader
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    I had forgotten Matress Girl, but now took a few seconds to see what has she being doing. Apparently, Miss Sulkowicz is still milking that fake rape accusation and chanelling it into dubious art and stupid interviews (https://jezebel.com/emma-sulkowicz-still-has-our-attention-1824290026).

    I don't know if I'm angry or sad for sad for her.

    Replies: @anon

  3. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Jeong is a running dog and sockpuppet of the Power that runs the Narrative.

    She has no agency, no critical mentality. She just sucks up the Official Narrative and Dogma and barks accordingly. That she bought into the UVA hoax is typical. Sabrina Rubin Erdely cooked it up, the Jewish-run media spread it far and wide. And people like Jeong took classes taught by Jews and cuck-whites. And her iconography of good and evil comes from Pop Culture and entertainment controlled by Hollywood.

    She is a product of Jewish Nudging. Jewish Power trains people to think in certain ways and then recruit those are most obedient to the training. Jeong seems 110% loyal to the Narrative. She is as fanatical about PC as Koreans in the past were fanatical about Christianity taught them by Missionaries. No agency and only dog-like subservience.

    Jews have ways of NUDGING people in the right direction. When Amy Chua wrote TRIPLE PACKAGE and had a chapter on Jews, the media didn’t like that too much, and the book was buried. Nudge Nudge.
    But when Chau wrote a new book POLITICAL TRIBES where she says NOTHING about Jews, the most powerful tribe in America, and beats on Alt Right, she was showered with media appearances. Nudge Nudge.

    Seong and Chua are nudge-nudged not to deviate from the Narrative. I suspect Chua personally knows more than she lets on. But I think Seong is a really stupid idiot who swallowed PC whole hog.

  4. On the other hand, the people who enthusiastically believed the story did so because they wanted to believe white college boys are monsters.

    Just like with Duke lacrosse.

  5. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Blacks are main rapists on campus, but the Narrative says White Boys Are Bad.

    Asian grinds are studious and obedient, and they favor Narrative over Reality. It’s ingrained in East Asian culture. For over 1000 yrs, Chinese and Koreans favored Confucian text and official dogma over reality. Truth was institutional and dogmatic, not something you found in the real world with a critical eye and individual consciousness.

    So, if the institution says White Boys Are Rapists even though Reality says Black Boys Are Rapists, people like Jeong are apt to go with the Narrative since their mentality is Trust the Authority.

  6. I still give it a 2/3 chance she will be forced out soon. More tweets are coming that she can’t explain away.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @midtown

    I'd call it 50/50.

    OTOH, more stuff is coming out - the NYT thought they had vetted her and knew about all the bad stuff and was prepared for it, but I'll bet that they missed half of it. The idiotically embarrassing defense of Jackie that she deleted but that Steve found in the wayback machine - I'd bet a dollar that they didn't dig deep enough to find that. They already have enough dumb people on the editorial board - they thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn't really seem to be mentally stable. Not what they thought they were bargaining for.

    OTOH, at this point it would be embarrassing to get rid of her - they would succeed in pissing off the right AND the left. Maybe they think it's better to double down on Sarah just like Sarah doubled down on Jackie.

    Replies: @istevefan, @Anonymous, @RW

    , @Forbes
    @midtown

    Sarah Jeong won't be fired. If only for the reason that they won't allow a prog-lefty to be taken down by the right. Doubling-down is their usual response.

    Remember, the new publisher appointed last January was the next generation, nepotistic Sulzburger scion. This is his call, ultimately.

    They saw her disqualifying "works" but decided she was adequately vetted, and made their decision. Besides, the NYT believes all that guff that you can't be racist about/against whites.

  7. What has she said that isn’t true?

    white men are responsible for most crime. ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR AGREE

    The white fragility is something to be hold. When you jerks become a minority on a level playing field you will die of shock

    Welcome to the everyday experience of People of Color

    • Replies: @fish
    @Tiny Duck

    Ohs Tinys....


    You’n sho be wurked up bout dis! Doan you’s wurry yo purty head....Lendsper....be round later to administur yo corrective! Start yo xersiazes now!


    Lendsnerp “I gots whats Tinys needz” pintz

  8. at least the (((Jewish chick))) (Sabrina Rubin Erdely) had the instincts to tie down a rich husband and pop out three child-support pillars, before going apeshit crazy.

    This Sarah Jeong is now in the same category as Mattress Girl: ain’t gonna catch no quality husband EVER

    Raise your hand if you think there’s many Asian-American guys who want to be yoked to this character.

    That goes TRIPLE for ACTUAL Korean guys. You know, the ones who get universally-conscripted into the infantry.

  9. A fantasist ? This revolting creature may personify the troika of anti sailerism modern thought. The who/whom duality of man…, the sj dub on steroids vanquishing her titular patrons/allies, the sophistry cum parasitism of the media pr political rackets.

    What is to be done ?

  10. they couldn’t believe nice white college boys were monsters.

    The term “boys,” when used here coupled with the adjective “white,” is a racial slur.

  11. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Has anyone captured the real killer of Nicole Simpson yet?

    I hear he was seen with Haven.

    Maybe Stephen Glass should be re-instituted as a journalist. Reality is fluid like gender. Journalism based on facts is White Supremacy. It’s the Narrative and Story-telling that matters. If a man says he’s a ‘woman’, he is. If a black guy says he saw KKK writing n-word on the wall, they did. Reality is subjective, and since POC subjectivity takes precedence over white objectivity, we must go with trans-reality and trans-journalism.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Anon

    Ufology. Black Ufology.

  12. What most bothered me about this incident was that UVA’s female president, Teresa Sullivan, spoke about the incident as if the fraternity boys were obviously guilty and as if her obligations as UVA president were only to Jackie and the female population. She ignored her obligation to consider the rights of the accused fraternity boys. I was hoping that the fraternity would sue, not Rolling Stone, but UVA and Sullivan, but I don’t think that happened. Instead they plumped for the convenient lie that UVA and the fraternity were both victims of Rolling Stone. It’s a shame that time after time the left gets away with crimes and lapses that an alert adversary would punish severely. I guess there is an unconscious acceptance of the left’s right to govern, and the right simply whines as a kind of pressure release mechanism. The left never really loses, never really pays.

    • Agree: Travis
  13. So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17648566/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-twitter-andrew-sullivan

    There is a lot of pent-up rage that has been building on the journalistic Left and they are going all in on Jeong. It should be noted that many of the former writers and editors from Nick Denton’s cesspit Gawker are now in positions of power in the mainstream media and they are now applying Gawker style tactics and Gawker style logic in the mainstream discourse.

    Really depressing.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Clifford Brown


    So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.
     
    As long as I have the anagram server up, here goes:

    Andrew Sullivan =

    Unrivalled swan.
    Vandals win, rule.
     
    RawMuscleGlutes (his defunct pen name) =

    Great mucus swell.
    Legal rectum wuss.
    Cream gullet, wuss.
    Wets muscular leg.
     
    Sorry for the OCD. I'll go to bed now...

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    , @Canadian Observer
    @Clifford Brown

    That’s a good point you make. If Jeong were a Jewish woman, people would be much more cautious about labeling her an anti-white lunatic or making remarks about her looks. Korean-Americans are less intimidating than members of the Jewish Diaspora or someone from the Global South.

  14. iow she’s a perfect fit for the nyt — amiright?

    • Replies: @eah
    @eah

    https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/783760960771203072

    , @Clifford Brown
    @eah

    I'm really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html


    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”
     
    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    Replies: @eah, @eah, @Frau Katze, @El Dato

  15. Sarah Jeong’s race/sex animus

    Now there’s a productive term:

    A unisex scream.

    Uses arcane mix.

    Sex-ruse maniac.

    Census area mix.

    Rue Mexican ass.

    Urine sac exams.

    Man saucier sex.

    Sex cures mania.

    And the entire phrase:

    Sarah Jeong, Macau’s sex siren.

  16. @MikeatMikedotMike
    Entirely predictable.

    In a bizarro dimension of inverted faux Christianity, I would also predict that Jeong is that reality's version of Simon, easing the burden of rape culture messiah Emma Sulkowicz at the 5th station of the mattress.

    Replies: @ThirdWorldSteveReader

    I had forgotten Matress Girl, but now took a few seconds to see what has she being doing. Apparently, Miss Sulkowicz is still milking that fake rape accusation and chanelling it into dubious art and stupid interviews (https://jezebel.com/emma-sulkowicz-still-has-our-attention-1824290026).

    I don’t know if I’m angry or sad for sad for her.

    • Replies: @anon
    @ThirdWorldSteveReader

    Meh. It’s a living.

  17. @eah
    iow she's a perfect fit for the nyt -- amiright?

    https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/771687585194319872

    Replies: @eah, @Clifford Brown

  18. @Clifford Brown
    So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.

    https://twitter.com/pblest/status/1025468240535986176

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17648566/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-twitter-andrew-sullivan

    There is a lot of pent-up rage that has been building on the journalistic Left and they are going all in on Jeong. It should be noted that many of the former writers and editors from Nick Denton's cesspit Gawker are now in positions of power in the mainstream media and they are now applying Gawker style tactics and Gawker style logic in the mainstream discourse.

    Really depressing.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Canadian Observer

    So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.

    As long as I have the anagram server up, here goes:

    Andrew Sullivan =

    Unrivalled swan.
    Vandals win, rule.

    RawMuscleGlutes (his defunct pen name) =

    Great mucus swell.
    Legal rectum wuss.
    Cream gullet, wuss.
    Wets muscular leg.

    Sorry for the OCD. I’ll go to bed now…

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @Reg Cæsar

    No need to apologize. I chuckled at a few of those.

  19. @Clifford Brown
    So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.

    https://twitter.com/pblest/status/1025468240535986176

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17648566/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-twitter-andrew-sullivan

    There is a lot of pent-up rage that has been building on the journalistic Left and they are going all in on Jeong. It should be noted that many of the former writers and editors from Nick Denton's cesspit Gawker are now in positions of power in the mainstream media and they are now applying Gawker style tactics and Gawker style logic in the mainstream discourse.

    Really depressing.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Canadian Observer

    That’s a good point you make. If Jeong were a Jewish woman, people would be much more cautious about labeling her an anti-white lunatic or making remarks about her looks. Korean-Americans are less intimidating than members of the Jewish Diaspora or someone from the Global South.

  20. @eah
    iow she's a perfect fit for the nyt -- amiright?

    https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/771687585194319872

    Replies: @eah, @Clifford Brown

    I’m really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html

    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”

    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    • Replies: @eah
    @Clifford Brown

    The NYT 'lost it' a long time ago -- Stephens is a Zionist Jew -- for him it's OK for American Whites to die in Middle East wars fought primarily to benefit Israel, but not to vote for Trump -- or want a wall.

    https://twitter.com/BretStephensNYT/status/500015082651516928

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    , @eah
    @Clifford Brown

    https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-if-white-men-were-not-complaining-it-would-be-an-indication-we-weren-t-succeeding-and-arthur-ochs-sulzberger-80-73-06.jpg

    , @Frau Katze
    @Clifford Brown

    The first NYT-pick comment on the Stephens’ article tells the press they started it.


    Journalists across the board have resorted to ad hominem attacks against Trump and his supporters from the get-go. These personal attacks need to stop because they will be volleyed back, adding more fuel to an already raging fire.

    Character assaults resolve nothing even though they may be completely defensible from the point of view of the journalist because the intended target(s) inevitably become indignant and respond in kind, or worse.

    Focus on Trump's record. And if the economy shows signs of improvement, make it front page news ... without an avalanche of qualifying statements.

    And when Trump's tariffs create negative consequences, be sure to keep score ... but eschew the snide remark, e.g., "Well, what could you expect from a business man who's had (x) amount of bankruptcies."
     
    , @El Dato
    @Clifford Brown


    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    We may need a military intervention. Maybe a no-fly zone will do it. Where's Miss Powerhouse? No, wait, where is Nikky?
  21. @midtown
    I still give it a 2/3 chance she will be forced out soon. More tweets are coming that she can't explain away.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Forbes

    I’d call it 50/50.

    OTOH, more stuff is coming out – the NYT thought they had vetted her and knew about all the bad stuff and was prepared for it, but I’ll bet that they missed half of it. The idiotically embarrassing defense of Jackie that she deleted but that Steve found in the wayback machine – I’d bet a dollar that they didn’t dig deep enough to find that. They already have enough dumb people on the editorial board – they thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn’t really seem to be mentally stable. Not what they thought they were bargaining for.

    OTOH, at this point it would be embarrassing to get rid of her – they would succeed in pissing off the right AND the left. Maybe they think it’s better to double down on Sarah just like Sarah doubled down on Jackie.

    • Replies: @istevefan
    @Jack D

    If Trump starts to tweet about this and attempts to make it an issue for the election, they will drop her.

    , @Anonymous
    @Jack D


    (NYT) thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn’t really seem to be mentally stable.
     
    I dunno, by actually not existing Mr Haven Monahan is sort of the perfect perpetrator. People like Sarah Jeong (and there are many) can project their sickest fantasies onto him and they cannot ever be disproven. Habeas Corpus!

    The mere fact that we are skeptical of her sick fantasies proves that we're no better than Mr Monahan, and soon (conveniently enough) we'll follow him into the land of nonextantus. Where we all belong.

    , @RW
    @Jack D

    It’s always fun to laugh at the New York Times, but I’m with Midtown, I think they’ll come to their senses soon and let her go. As you pointed out, there does seem to be some element of mental instability, which they’ll realize doesn’t look good. Still amazing she got the job though.

  22. @Tiny Duck
    What has she said that isn't true?

    white men are responsible for most crime. ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR AGREE

    The white fragility is something to be hold. When you jerks become a minority on a level playing field you will die of shock

    Welcome to the everyday experience of People of Color

    Replies: @fish

    Ohs Tinys….

    You’n sho be wurked up bout dis! Doan you’s wurry yo purty head….Lendsper….be round later to administur yo corrective! Start yo xersiazes now!

    Lendsnerp “I gots whats Tinys needz” pintz

  23. istevefan says:

    This gal hates whites. So why does she give a shit about the story of a white lady being raped by white men? Whether it’s true or not, it should be of no import to her. Just like the weekly grind of black-on-black murders in Chicago is not on the mind of Richard Spencer, the troubles of whites should not concern her.

  24. @Jack D
    @midtown

    I'd call it 50/50.

    OTOH, more stuff is coming out - the NYT thought they had vetted her and knew about all the bad stuff and was prepared for it, but I'll bet that they missed half of it. The idiotically embarrassing defense of Jackie that she deleted but that Steve found in the wayback machine - I'd bet a dollar that they didn't dig deep enough to find that. They already have enough dumb people on the editorial board - they thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn't really seem to be mentally stable. Not what they thought they were bargaining for.

    OTOH, at this point it would be embarrassing to get rid of her - they would succeed in pissing off the right AND the left. Maybe they think it's better to double down on Sarah just like Sarah doubled down on Jackie.

    Replies: @istevefan, @Anonymous, @RW

    If Trump starts to tweet about this and attempts to make it an issue for the election, they will drop her.

  25. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @midtown

    I'd call it 50/50.

    OTOH, more stuff is coming out - the NYT thought they had vetted her and knew about all the bad stuff and was prepared for it, but I'll bet that they missed half of it. The idiotically embarrassing defense of Jackie that she deleted but that Steve found in the wayback machine - I'd bet a dollar that they didn't dig deep enough to find that. They already have enough dumb people on the editorial board - they thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn't really seem to be mentally stable. Not what they thought they were bargaining for.

    OTOH, at this point it would be embarrassing to get rid of her - they would succeed in pissing off the right AND the left. Maybe they think it's better to double down on Sarah just like Sarah doubled down on Jackie.

    Replies: @istevefan, @Anonymous, @RW

    (NYT) thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn’t really seem to be mentally stable.

    I dunno, by actually not existing Mr Haven Monahan is sort of the perfect perpetrator. People like Sarah Jeong (and there are many) can project their sickest fantasies onto him and they cannot ever be disproven. Habeas Corpus!

    The mere fact that we are skeptical of her sick fantasies proves that we’re no better than Mr Monahan, and soon (conveniently enough) we’ll follow him into the land of nonextantus. Where we all belong.

  26. @Anon
    Has anyone captured the real killer of Nicole Simpson yet?

    I hear he was seen with Haven.

    Maybe Stephen Glass should be re-instituted as a journalist. Reality is fluid like gender. Journalism based on facts is White Supremacy. It's the Narrative and Story-telling that matters. If a man says he's a 'woman', he is. If a black guy says he saw KKK writing n-word on the wall, they did. Reality is subjective, and since POC subjectivity takes precedence over white objectivity, we must go with trans-reality and trans-journalism.

    https://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/images/o-NEWSWEEK-OBAMA-facebook.jpg

    Replies: @El Dato

    Ufology. Black Ufology.

  27. @ThirdWorldSteveReader
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    I had forgotten Matress Girl, but now took a few seconds to see what has she being doing. Apparently, Miss Sulkowicz is still milking that fake rape accusation and chanelling it into dubious art and stupid interviews (https://jezebel.com/emma-sulkowicz-still-has-our-attention-1824290026).

    I don't know if I'm angry or sad for sad for her.

    Replies: @anon

    Meh. It’s a living.

  28. Anonymous[367] • Disclaimer says:

    We called bullshit on the story because it reeked of bullshit. And the real tragedy here is that Rolling Stone magazine wasn’t destroyed and with it a large chunk of Jann Wenner’s personal wealth as well.

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @Anonymous

    Yes, of.course. No rape in a fraternity house is ever going to involve (1) a victim who can identifying a rapist and (2) violence that produces injury that visibly evidences the victim's lack of consent.

  29. @Clifford Brown
    @eah

    I'm really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html


    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”
     
    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    Replies: @eah, @eah, @Frau Katze, @El Dato

    The NYT ‘lost it’ a long time ago — Stephens is a Zionist Jew — for him it’s OK for American Whites to die in Middle East wars fought primarily to benefit Israel, but not to vote for Trump — or want a wall.

    https://twitter.com/BretStephensNYT/status/500015082651516928

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @eah

    I'm not interested in his Zionism. I'm interested in his misnthropic obsession with population replacement.

  30. Jeong is a perfect example of the Conservative Movement being wrong about everything. To Mainstream Conservatives, Asians are natural conservatives who will use America’s freedoms to do all good things, and because they tend to have high IQs (which Conservative Inc does not want mentioned) and solid family structure and good work ethic, they will succeed. And in succeeding, Asians will prove that America is not run by evil racists who slaughter all non-whites who might have any chance to succeed. And that will be a great example for blacks, who will be uplifted into better behavior by the examples of Asians.

    Of course, that makes sense only if (A) there is no such thing as Original Sin, and (B) Asians have no history being murderously clannish based upon both individual and group greed and desire to wield all power that can be amassed, no matter how many tens of millions must be slaughtered and hundreds of millions reduced to beggary in order to amass the power.

    If anything, Asian Marxists, to use one example, have been at least as insanely desirous of mass slaughter as have Jewish Marxists such as Trotsky.

  31. RW says:
    @Jack D
    @midtown

    I'd call it 50/50.

    OTOH, more stuff is coming out - the NYT thought they had vetted her and knew about all the bad stuff and was prepared for it, but I'll bet that they missed half of it. The idiotically embarrassing defense of Jackie that she deleted but that Steve found in the wayback machine - I'd bet a dollar that they didn't dig deep enough to find that. They already have enough dumb people on the editorial board - they thought they were hiring a really sharp (and sharp tongued) Harvard Law Asian but she turns out to be a idiot who operates by feelz and doesn't really seem to be mentally stable. Not what they thought they were bargaining for.

    OTOH, at this point it would be embarrassing to get rid of her - they would succeed in pissing off the right AND the left. Maybe they think it's better to double down on Sarah just like Sarah doubled down on Jackie.

    Replies: @istevefan, @Anonymous, @RW

    It’s always fun to laugh at the New York Times, but I’m with Midtown, I think they’ll come to their senses soon and let her go. As you pointed out, there does seem to be some element of mental instability, which they’ll realize doesn’t look good. Still amazing she got the job though.

  32. @Clifford Brown
    @eah

    I'm really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html


    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”
     
    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    Replies: @eah, @eah, @Frau Katze, @El Dato

  33. @Reg Cæsar
    @Clifford Brown


    So it basically is a scorched Earth policy right now against traitor Andrew Sullivan.
     
    As long as I have the anagram server up, here goes:

    Andrew Sullivan =

    Unrivalled swan.
    Vandals win, rule.
     
    RawMuscleGlutes (his defunct pen name) =

    Great mucus swell.
    Legal rectum wuss.
    Cream gullet, wuss.
    Wets muscular leg.
     
    Sorry for the OCD. I'll go to bed now...

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    No need to apologize. I chuckled at a few of those.

  34. @Anonymous
    We called bullshit on the story because it reeked of bullshit. And the real tragedy here is that Rolling Stone magazine wasn't destroyed and with it a large chunk of Jann Wenner's personal wealth as well.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    Yes, of.course. No rape in a fraternity house is ever going to involve (1) a victim who can identifying a rapist and (2) violence that produces injury that visibly evidences the victim’s lack of consent.

  35. @eah
    @Clifford Brown

    The NYT 'lost it' a long time ago -- Stephens is a Zionist Jew -- for him it's OK for American Whites to die in Middle East wars fought primarily to benefit Israel, but not to vote for Trump -- or want a wall.

    https://twitter.com/BretStephensNYT/status/500015082651516928

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    I’m not interested in his Zionism. I’m interested in his misnthropic obsession with population replacement.

  36. Slightly OT but, generally speaking, none of this woman’s stuff is original. We’ve been hearing variations on the same theme from the SJW crowd for quite awhile now, so I can’t help wondering if all these pearls of wisdom constitute anything more than shtick served up for the enjoyment of the choir for the purpose of attracting a following (not to mention $$$s) and carving a niche for herself. In other words, a sort of Oriental Al Sharpton.

  37. @midtown
    I still give it a 2/3 chance she will be forced out soon. More tweets are coming that she can't explain away.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Forbes

    Sarah Jeong won’t be fired. If only for the reason that they won’t allow a prog-lefty to be taken down by the right. Doubling-down is their usual response.

    Remember, the new publisher appointed last January was the next generation, nepotistic Sulzburger scion. This is his call, ultimately.

    They saw her disqualifying “works” but decided she was adequately vetted, and made their decision. Besides, the NYT believes all that guff that you can’t be racist about/against whites.

  38. Sarah believes in narrative based justice rather than this really bizarre legal idea (of the last several centuries) that every case is unique unto itself.

  39. This woman is stupider AND NUTTIER than I thought she was…..but man she can’t seem to get enough of dating us.

    Most of her Bay Area bfs must be closeted soy boys…..she must be looking for a white dude who’s into whips and chains and that sorta freaky dom crap.

  40. @Clifford Brown
    @eah

    I'm really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html


    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”
     
    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    Replies: @eah, @eah, @Frau Katze, @El Dato

    The first NYT-pick comment on the Stephens’ article tells the press they started it.

    Journalists across the board have resorted to ad hominem attacks against Trump and his supporters from the get-go. These personal attacks need to stop because they will be volleyed back, adding more fuel to an already raging fire.

    Character assaults resolve nothing even though they may be completely defensible from the point of view of the journalist because the intended target(s) inevitably become indignant and respond in kind, or worse.

    Focus on Trump’s record. And if the economy shows signs of improvement, make it front page news … without an avalanche of qualifying statements.

    And when Trump’s tariffs create negative consequences, be sure to keep score … but eschew the snide remark, e.g., “Well, what could you expect from a business man who’s had (x) amount of bankruptcies.”

  41. @Clifford Brown
    @eah

    I'm really starting to worry that the NY Times may be losing it. Something happened in the past week that has really ratcheted up the rhetoric.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-fake-news-enemy.html


    The voice, if I had to guess, belongs to that of a white American male in late middle age. The accent is faintly Southern, the manner taunting but relaxed. It’s also familiar: I’m pretty sure he’s left a message on my office number before. But the last voice mail left almost no impression. Not this time.

    “Hey Bret, what do you think? Do you think the pen is mightier than the sword, or that the AR is mightier than the pen?”

    He continues: “I don’t carry an AR but once we start shooting you f—ers you aren’t going to pop off like you do now. You’re worthless, the press is the enemy of the United States people and, you know what, rather than me shoot you, I hope a Mexican and, even better yet, I hope a n— shoots you in the head, dead.”

    He repeats the racial slur 10 times in a staccato rhythm, concluding with the send-off: “Have a nice day, n— lover.”
     
    Did this actually happen? Is Brett Stephens possibly being threatened because he is so unbearably boring? Did he file a police report?

    The Children at the Trump Rallies

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/opinion/trump-rally-maga.html

    Replies: @eah, @eah, @Frau Katze, @El Dato

    What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer.

    We may need a military intervention. Maybe a no-fly zone will do it. Where’s Miss Powerhouse? No, wait, where is Nikky?

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS