The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Sailer: The Hate That Dare Not Speak Its Name

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From Chronicles:

The Hate That Dare Not Speak Its Name
MAY 2024 BY STEVE SAILER

The right’s unwillingness to mount a coherent defense against racist anti-white animus encourages the left to keep it up.

One of the most important but least mentioned developments over the last 10 to 12 years has been the growth in respectability of anti-white hate. …

Why has racist enmity against whites become so acceptable? There are multiple reasons, but I think the most important driver is that the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes. The less you demographically resemble George Washington, Ben Franklin, or John Adams, the more likely you are to vote Democratic. Pitting the increasing margins of American society against its core has been reasonably successful for the Democrats: they’ve won a plurality of votes in seven of the last eight presidential elections.

But you can also see the obvious problem with this ploy: how exactly do you unite black church ladies, transgenders, Asian immigrants, movie executives, academics, blue-collar Hispanics, gays, and so forth? The only solution Democrats and their affiliates in the press have come up with has been to stoke resentment and animus among Fringe Americans toward Core Americans (whites, men, straights, the married, homeowners, and so forth).

Granted, there’s a ruthless logic to the Democrats’ tactics. But those tactics are also hard to defend ethically.

Importing ringers from abroad to vote for you is bad enough, but then encouraging racist animus toward other Americans to keep your ramshackle alliance from turning on itself is even worse.

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 171 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wokechoke says:

    What Steve wants you to imagine.

    What you get…Jewish militias attacking you while the
    Riot Police look on counting out their pension shekels.

    Go Bruins!

    • Agree: fish
    • Replies: @JimDandy
  2. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:

    don’t ask The New York Times. In its 173 years, it’s never seen fit to print any possible version of the term [anti-white] even once. As George Orwell pointed out in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four’s “The Principles of Newspeak” appendix, it’s hard to notice a reality if you don’t have a word for it.

    I wonder if the more important effect of linguistic control of this kind is not preventing individuals from ‘noticing’ or conceptualizing things, but to prevent groups from being able to communicate and organize for collective action.

    Speech is social thought. It’s the way that groups “think” and organize.

    This is why Jews monopolize their hosts’ media. They are thereby able to, for example, indoctrinate their host population to regard as taboo any discussion of Jews themselves, their their power – except, perhaps, in hushed, reverential and sycophantic terms. Jews thereby ensure that the host population can never collectively recognize and mount a resistance against Jewish tyranny and parasitism.

    A nation can only “think” if its citizens are able to freely communicate and disrupting this communication leads to, effectively, national inebriation. Individuals may be able to see the tyranny but if they’re unable to communicate their observations to their fellow citizens then they will never be able to organize and mount a collective defense. This is by design.

    More:
    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/four-eyed-dweeb-mike-johnson-says-antisemitism-is-a-virus/#comment-6544973

    Quoting Understory:

    I would like to add this article titled Relaxed selection underlies genome erosion in socially parasitic ant species.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23178-w

    Basically, due to their small numbers, refusal to do work, and inbreeding, social parasites undergo genetic erosion over time. It’s interesting to note many social parasites are recently evolved, meaning they are likely genetic dead ends. I believe the parasites we contend with have evolved through divergent selection and specialize in parasitic signalling (lying) within human colonies.

    From Wikipedia: Divergent evolution or divergent selection is the accumulation of differences between closely related populations within a species, sometimes leading to speciation.

    Now add to this the social psychological concept of malignant collective narcissism and I believe we have a fairly thorough understanding of the situation.

    See:
    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/four-eyed-dweeb-mike-johnson-says-antisemitism-is-a-virus/#comment-6545287

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  3. “the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes”

    That only accounts for the USA. The same dynamic is happening in Britain, Ireland, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, NZ ..

  4. Anonymous[809] • Disclaimer says:

    Right-wing is chicken-wing.

  5. Anonymous[776] • Disclaimer says:

    Using the enemy’s term ‘racism’ is the problem.

  6. JimDandy says:
    @Wokechoke

    What would Jennifer Rubin do?

  7. Conservative politicians, pundits, and public intellectuals are mostly grifting conformist cowards by nature. Going forward, the refusal to call “anti-white” racism by its name should function as a pretty good initial litmus test to separate the cucks from the chaff.

    Another litmus test is how hard they are willing to shill for money for the Jewish Lobby. You can really tell who’s who right now. An AIPAC memo clearly dropped this week instructing all these “Conservatives” to start earning their money by labelling any criticism of Israel/Jews as “left wing,” “Marxist,” unpatriotic, etc.

    This illogical campaign to bear hug Israel and Jews as the truest friends of the American Right is so obviously orchestrated and donor-driven that it’s embarrassing and pathetic.

    Heck, the majority of all normie Americans are kind of grossed out by Israel’s bloodlust in Gaza. So the hysterical defense of Israel by “right-wing” leaders is like when all the professional movie critics on Rotten Tomatoes rate a movie as the opposite of the actual moviegoers — you know the fix is in.

  8. AKAHorace says:

    Why has racist enmity against whites become so acceptable? There are multiple reasons, but I think the most important driver is that the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes. The less you demographically resemble George Washington, Ben Franklin, or John Adams, the more likely you are to vote Democratic.

    Except. this is happening all across the West, not just in the United States. I think you need a larger explanation here.

    Also, a lonely and unimportant Crusade of my own, could you help fight against the overuse of the word multiple when there are so many better words ? several, many, a few.

  9. Old Prude says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    Good stuff, Toad, but one priggish note: The cucks ARE the chaff.

  10. Bill P says:

    My millennial priest denounced anti-white hatred a few months ago, and he’s a political moderate. People know it’s morally wrong, so it wouldn’t be politically costly to call it out. I’m surprised more politicians haven’t figured that out. Maybe they’re just afraid the degenerates in the media would jump them for it.

    • Agree: Twinkie, TWS
    • Replies: @SFG
  11. There isn’t a short, catchy version of “It’s not whiteness, it’s all the things that help you be successful in America”

    When people are thinking on these lines:

    https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333
    I think that’s a big part of your problem there

  12. SFG says:
    @Bill P

    Yup, it’s the media.

    Starting to weaken, though.

  13. ANON[168] • Disclaimer says:

    The best strategy for Whites is to disengage from American Culture. The radical Right wants to secede. Bad idea. Who gets all that White money? After disengagement, begin to form small, rural communities. Take over local government at the township and borough level. Christian churches have a key role in this movement. The Christian church is the only institution large enough to combat Wokeism. Do we accept apostate progressives into the movement? Yes, especially Jews. The only institution worth keeping is the public education system. This legacy institution must be recovered. Electing conservative school board members is inane. The real power is in the classroom. A long-term goal is to recruit young people to be teachers who teach through the lens of Conservatism. It took 60 years for us to lose American culture.(1965-2024). It will might take 60 years to recover it. Once the movement of disengagement and localism catches on, the return may accelerate and take less than 60 years.

  14. Mark G. says:

    Most Whites are productive individuals who would benefit from a free market economy, the elimination of affirmative action in private industry and government, and shrinking a large welfare state that involves disproportionately transferring wealth from Whites to minorities.

    Non-Whites are voting to put in place a large socialist welfare state that is not affordable. Their greed is leading them to kill the goose laying the golden eggs. Our national debt is headed to a level where the interest payments use up all tax revenues.

    The country will likely fall apart like the Soviet Union did. After that fell apart, Estonia adopted free market economic policies and became prosperous. After we fall apart, there will be some small prosperous mostly White countries with free market economies here. You can see them forming now as productive Whites move from places like California, New York and Illinois to places like Texas, Florida and Indiana.

    • Agree: TWS
  15. Mike Tre says:

    Republican politicians are funded by the same people who fund the Democrat politicians. Zblog has pointed out many times that the GOP’s job is to basically complain publicly about whatever the issue is then eventually concede.

  16. Apparently people who are inherently different (diversity) should succeed proportionately (equity) as if they weren’t inherently different.

    DEI is only a license to cheat, not a license to steal. Put the discrimination at the end of the application process and then you can identify and compensate the white or Asian person for trespassing on their civil rights. This way you get the benefits of diversity which are too subtle and sublime for words and the schmuck who is screwed over gets some meager compensation.

    Why can’t our institutions simply pay for what they take?

  17. Arclight says:
    @Mark G.

    Largely agree – whites and Asians are net taxpayers, everyone else (especially blacks) are a net loss, and that’s just at the federal level. Transferring large sums of money from whites to minorities was initially viewed as a mechanism to give the latter a chance to move up and hopefully keep things tranquil, but obviously it didn’t work and the demands for whites resources just grow and grow. Unfortunately there are still a lot of whites who don’t realize that all their virtue signaling and allyship count for nothing in the end – the ideology they support with their votes will come for them and their assets too.

    The Biden Administration’s plan to hike capital gains taxes justifies it on racial equity grounds noting whites are the largest group that benefits from the lower capital gains rates whereas small numbers of blacks and Latinos do. Obviously the implication of that is whites risk far more of their already-taxed capital to start successful businesses, invest in real estate or the market than blacks and Latinos and therefore are generating the overwhelming majority of this tax revenue. Rather than appreciate the economic activity and tax revenue this provides, they just want to squeeze the golden geese you mentioned for more eggs.

    I don’t think a national breakup is likely. What I do think is that as the country slides further into indebtedness and systems grow more inefficient thanks to DEI, we will see more local and state-level enclavism. The example of what happened in Louisiana lately where a majority white and upper class section of Baton Rouge essentially removed itself is not possible everywhere but will be more common in one way or another.

    The GOP is totally spineless and lacks strategic vision but they have absolutely nothing to lose by hammering immigration as harmful to Americans of all stripes and highlighting personal stories about whites getting hosed by vindictive racial politics. It might take a few election cycles for it to really set in, but there are more and more normie whites who are disquieted by what they are seeing and just need permission to feel it’s OK to vote on that basis.

    • Agree: bomag
  18. Pudinhead says:

    It’s funny that Yankees need to import slaves to maintain their pimphand Priviledge to keep their nose above the sea of debt they racked up. Let them burn.

  19. Spud Boy says:

    “how exactly do you unite black church ladies, transgenders, Asian immigrants, movie executives, academics, blue-collar Hispanics, gays, and so forth?”

    > Blacks are hooked on welfare and promises of reparations.
    > Asians, hispanics and gays are now part of the DEI grift.
    > Movie executives? You mean wealthy Jews? Need I say more.

    And don’t forget government workers–government at all levels is now so large that it has become a significant voting block that’s reliably 90% Democrat.

    The Democrats start every election with at least 200 electoral votes, no matter the candidate. Add 5% to the vote in Blue counties in swing states from various forms of legal cheating and the GOP has little to no chance.

    I agree with Scott Adams that unless Trump is ahead by 10% going into the election, he will lose.

  20. Steve, what’s going on with Taki’s Magazine? First, they disabled the comments…now there’s no Sailer content this week! What’s the deal?

  21. Let’s see, white people invented the modern world that everybody else wants to belong to.

    Maybe it should have been north Asians who invented this most desirable world – they’re smarter and harder working – but it wasn’t for some reason. Delayed phonetic alphabet? No patent laws? So north Asians have to be satisfied with being highly successful in this white-created modern world. And playing classical music for lazy whites.

    It might have been Jews who created the modern world, but there were too few of them, so they had to collaborate with their duller gentile white neighbors.

    And the rest of the world has to kvetch about being slightly less successful than whites and Jews and north Asians in this highly desirable world. So the media provides comfort food for the kvetchers.

    • Replies: @bomag
  22. Anonymous[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    In order to survive as a distinct group, Jews must either employ segregationist tactics or degrade the genomes of sexually appealing competitor groups.

    Otherwise there will be intermarriage and assimilation.

  23. It’s not “racism” that drives the hate. It’s just anti-Whiteism. People have been aware of racial differences in the deep past and it didn’t lead to genocidal hatred.

    What’s bizarre about current the GOP is how cuckish they are. The majority of white people are sick of being targeted for abuse and would love a defense.

    This is fertile ground for future politicians.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
  24. Longtime reader, first time commenter. It was an honor to meet you on the Noticing tour.

    My grandparents learned about this the hard way. They were denounced in Chinese Cultural Revolution struggle sessions. If no one stands up to the Red Guard, they will devour everything in their sights and destroy the four olds of civilization.

    Hope you and your audience enjoy my 3 Body Problem struggle session parodies reimagined for the modern West: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/jordan-peterson-struggle-session-episode-3

  25. bomag says:
    @Henry Canaday

    Agree.

    Something here about bringing forth bleeding edge outliers in technical fields; and fostering cooperation at scale that supports the insights of the outliers.

  26. J.Ross says:

    Apparently protesters on either side of the state terrorism issue were chanting together “%$#@ Joe Biden.” I heard it on the radio but am not finding the tweet.

    • Replies: @Brutusale
  27. MEH 0910 says:

    And let’s make sure not to let the Biden administration concoct a new Middle Eastern and North African racial category for the national census that might reassure Jews that they can safely engage in what I call “flight from white,” or the disavowal of white identity when it becomes inconvenient.

    https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2024/04/updates-race-ethnicity-standards.html

    What Updates to OMB’s Race/Ethnicity Standards Mean for the Census Bureau
    April 08, 2024
    […]
    New “Middle Eastern or North African” Category
    The updated SPD 15 adds a new, dedicated “Middle Eastern or North African” (MENA) category. In the previous 1997 SPD 15, MENA respondents were defined and tabulated within the White racial category.

    Extensive engagement with the Middle Eastern or North African community has shown strong support for a MENA category and the need for demographic and socioeconomic statistics about its population to inform policy decisions, health research, civil rights monitoring and enforcement, and many other needs.

    Our research has found that including a MENA category in a combined race/ethnicity questions helps MENA respondents report their MENA identities more accurately. When no such category is available, MENA respondents are less likely to report as only MENA and instead report their MENA identity within the White category.
    […]
    Table 1. Revised Definitions for Minimum Race/Ethnicity Reporting Categories in 2024 SPD 15

    Minimum Race/Ethnicity Reporting Category
    Middle Eastern or North African
    Definition
    Individuals with origins in any of the original peoples of the Middle East or North Africa, including, for example, Lebanese, Iranian, Egyptian, Syrian, Iraqi, and Israeli.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  28. George says:

    “But the Great Awokening, such as the 2015 #OscarsSoWhite frenzy, has tended to focus on driving whites out of the most desirable (i.e., most Jewish) jobs. ”

    Are there actual statistics of Jews and whites in general losing work in show business to non whites? The internet probably has put pressure on all show business jobs. YouTuber Majority Report (Sam Seder) is an old timer who talks occasionally about how the behind the scenes jobs in show business are not as lucrative as they used to be. It is not that waves of Black people are replacing Jewish writers. Asians replacing Jewish/white writers might be happening.

  29. It’s a philosophy that appeals less to hard men than to overweight women.

    Overweight women vastly outnumber hard men in this country. One of the more valid criticisms of Americans is that we are too fat.

    I’m referring to the normalization of anti-white racism in media discourse.

    Anti-white racism in white media discourse. This almost always emits from a white face.

    The Washington Post was the rare institution that chose to also capitalize “white.”

    The Wigger Post.

    If the Associated Press and the like suddenly changing the rules of capitalization to make clear who are the Good Guys and who are the Bad Guys seems childish, well, it is childish.

    Infantile. And it cuts both ways.

    Wokeness is a puerile, lowbrow, greed-driven, racist tantrum.

    As is “identity politics” in general. The way to deal with recalcitrant pigs is not to join them in the trough. Take the trough away. A “Mexican martial arts” video promoted on portal screens is titled “Make Every Fight a Ground Fight“. Really? Didn’t Sun Tzu advise otherwise?

    Hating whites because they are white is wrong.

    How about hating them because they’re faggots?

    Not that one really wants to “exterminate” whites, which sounds genocidal…

    Not to mention counter-productive.

    —just their whiteness. Or something.

    The problem with “whiteness”, and “white” for that matter, is that it is vague and ephemeral. Uninspiring, for negative purposes, and even more for positive. It doesn’t even have a flag to rally behind. (Oh, wait…)

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  30. anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @MEH 0910

    Extensive engagement with the Middle Eastern or North African community has shown strong support for a MENA category and the need for demographic and socioeconomic statistics about its population to inform policy decisions, health research, civil rights monitoring and enforcement, and many other needs.

    Thanks Jews!

  31. @Mark G.

    …some small prosperous mostly White countries with free market economies here. You can see them forming now as productive Whites move from places like California, New York and Illinois to places like Texas, Florida and Indiana.

    Texas, Florida, and Indiana? Why not far whiter Maine, Idaho, and West Virginia?

    • Replies: @Brutusale
  32. Black church ladies, transgenders, Asian immigrants, South Asian immigrants, homosexuals, Muslims, Latinos, and above all Jews all ALREADY hated white people with the fury of a thousand suns. And no matter what whites give them or how much, they will all still hate whites.

    So I’m not sure it was a conscious DNC strategy, so much as the Dems just picking up a series of hundred-dollar bills that were left lying on the ground.

    Of course the GOP, being slaves, hookers, cowards and retards, walk down the street Mister Magoo-like, never noticing the bags and bags of gold bullion also left in their path.

  33. MEH 0910 says:

    Archived link to Steve’s Chronicles article:
    https://archive.ph/11W9l

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  34. Importing ringers from abroad to vote for you is bad enough, but then encouraging racist animus toward other Americans to keep your ramshackle alliance from turning on itself is even worse.

    “Immigration” itself–in the modern sense of the term–is a ridiculous notion/ideology.

    You don’t open your territory to other peoples. Territory is hard to come by, contention is routine and holding your patch was pretty much your prime directive. Actually, inviting another people to come in had been very, very rare before modern times and the results always ended up being disastrous in the long run.

    What was going on in the Americas was not “immigration”, but rather conquest–more or your own people coming in to take the land from the natives–and also slavery. (Ditto Australia–absent the slavery.) Because the US was in competition with other states–Britain/Canada (north) and Spain/Mexico (south)–there was a willingness to allow a broad definition of “your own people” to fill out our territory–to conquest faster. Later, then with industrialization booming we had simple cheap labor grubbing. All this could sort of “work” … but only to the extent that the people coming were “close enough”–would assimilate and integrate and just become “Americans”. As soon as you have people who have a distinctly separate and integration rejecting identity, you have a big problem.

    There is really no case for mass immigration. But if you were doing it in a democratic polity, the logical/safe approach would be that the immigrants and their descendants are not citizens until they are themselves relatives of the natives–i.e. married-with-children into the nation’s core population.

    Allowing these ringers–people who not biologically part of the nation, or worse holding themselves separate from it, or even worse hostile to it–the vote, a say in the nation’s future, is a ticket to contention, fracture and destruction. As we are seeing …

    • Agree: Goddard, Bardon Kaldian, mc23, TWS
    • Replies: @mc23
  35. guest007 says:
    @Arclight

    The budget deficit is around $1.7 trillion. If one does not want to pay more taxes. please feel free to list the $1.7 trillion in cuts that can be made to balance the budget.

    Of course, capital gains taxes benefits silicon valley and Wall Street the most. If the Republicans were really trying to be a populist party, the Republicans would be jacking up taxes on Wall Street to close the budget deficit.

    • Replies: @Ralph L
    , @The Anti-Gnostic
  36. @Reg Cæsar

    “Jewish” is also lacking in a lot of specificity, but by golly those Ashkenazi, Sephards and Mizrahi can rally as one behind the Nation of Israel when they need to. Not that there’s anything wrong with ethnic nationalism.

    “Christian” is no longer a rallying point because Christians blew up the physical territory of Christendom. The Amish and Mennonites didn’t and that’s why they’re the ones with the positive TFRs.

    Also, you can drop all the chest-thumping “I hate fags” talk. Your church already blesses homosexual unions.

    • Agree: J.Ross
    • Thanks: Renard
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    , @Reg Cæsar
    , @Gabe Ruth
  37. Liza says:
    @Mark G.

    The country will likely fall apart like the Soviet Union did. After that fell apart, Estonia adopted free market economic policies and became prosperous.

    Theoretically possible. There’s other things going on, though, such as the possibility of world wide war, probably with nuclear weapons. So, all bets are off.

    I wish you were right, though, about a falling apart with the ultimate development of free markets, etc.

  38. The big “tell” with anti-whitism is that the “coalition of fringes” does not run from whites but toward whites.

    Minorities run toward white nations, white neighborhoods, white institutions. Minorities’ interest is not in getting away from the mythical white “oppression”, but in glomming onto what whites produce and have produced. This is very different from most ethnic hostility where one (or both) groups just want to get rid of the other group–not have them around. Instead, anti-whitism is demanding that whites *not* keep a hold of anything they build–most especially their own nations–but turn it over to minorities.

    If whites–grew a pair–and said something like:
    “Hey, you’ve made it clear we whites bug you. You claim we are “oppressing” you with our “white privilege”. So we will just separate and leave y’all in peace. We’ll take say West of the Mississippi, all you minorities will stay East of it. Sound good?”

    LOL. The shrieking would be through the roof. Racism! Oppression! Xenophobia! Anti-semitism! Islamophobia!. What these folks hate most is not whites, but not being able to glom onto whites’ stuff–feed at the big white trough.

    Again, the sea change in progressivism from Waspy fix-the-world “everyone behave like a middle class Wasp” do-gooderism of the early 20th century, to our current “evil whitey is oppressing me!” minoritarianism is rooted in traditional Jewish middle-man driven ideology. The host population–Whites–must be available for looting. It can not be allowed to keep its stuff for itself. The host can not say “no”. “Oppression” is whites not allowing themselves to be looted. White’s keeping their stuff for themselves.

  39. Mr. Anon says:

    The right’s unwillingness to mount a coherent defense against racist anti-white animus encourages the left to keep it up.

    If the Republican Party doesn’t make an issue of it, one might conclude it is because they don’t care.

    A lot of their backers are the same people who back the Democrats.

    Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Dan Crenshaw…….they don’t give a damn about ordinary white people. Tom Cotton occasionally mouths a few supportive words for the people who vote for him………….. when he’s on FOX, advocating ever more military and political support for Ukraine and Israel.

    They don’t represent us. They never have.

    The purpose of the Democratic Party is to sell globalist neo-liberal capitalism to liberals.

    The purpose of the Republican Party is to sell globalist neo-liberal capitalism to conservatives.

  40. Anonymous[119] • Disclaimer says:

    Well, at the rate we’re going, The Unz Review will be shut down by federal authorities by 2025.


    “We’ve got him in custody. He was just about to publish a 15,000-word essay on Covid, the Holocaust, and Israeli assassinations.”

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  41. Mr. Anon says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    “An AIPAC memo clearly dropped this week instructing all these “Conservatives” to start earning their money by labelling any criticism of Israel/Jews as “left wing,” “Marxist,” unpatriotic, etc.”

    And protesters are now “terrorists”.

  42. George Washington would probably vote Republican today as he was ex-military and a big time owner of slaves and he would want to own slaves tax-free.

    However Franklin only had a couple of household slaves and eventually turned against slavery and became a fierce opponent of slavery and at some point in time seems to have freed his slaves.

    One of the sons of his slaves was called King, so he might have been known as King Franklin.

    The Democratic party has people of all kinds of ethnicities voting for it. If a large majority of the people who vote for the Republicans are white, then very likely a significant percentage of that number vote Republican based on racial animosity, rather than, say, on foreign policy or abortion.

    In any case if the Republicans are not getting enough votes from minority ethnicities, then maybe they need to look at their policy positions and make them more appealing to more people.

    After all, most general elections depend on half a dozen marginal states, so the most important winning tactic for either party is to tip at least 50% of voters in those states onto your side by attracting their votes. This may differ a bit from state to state.

    I remember once many years ago talking to a Filipino guy who is qualified to vote in American elections, and he said there was no way he was voting for the Democrats, because it was the party of the blacks.

    This is precisely the kind of division that Republicans could well use to their advantage. The Republicans could also win over Arab votes by opposing Israel and providing an alternative to Biden’s enthusiasm for Old Testament tribal warfare.

  43. campaign funding and job security for Republican politicians is generally contingent on them not noticing that there is a war against the people of europe.

    if they notice out loud, they’ll be looking for a new job soon.

    you can notice out loud if you are independently wealthy. 99% of them are not.

  44. Barnard says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    Trying to criminalize claims that Jews killed Jesus may backfire on them. It still seems to be working on evangelical Boomers, but younger generations are not interested in this.

  45. Tex says:

    “Movie executives” has got to be the best euphemism for Jews ever coined.

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
  46. @Arclight

    Obviously the implication of that is whites risk far more of their already-taxed capital to start successful businesses, invest in real estate or the market than blacks

    Actually my impression is that most business startups use money borrowed from banks rather than personal savings.

    The interesting thing is that to lend you $100,000, a bank doesn’t need to have $100,000 in cash, so by the bank making that loan, new money is created.

    For most people getting their first $10,000 in spare cash is the hardest and can take years, especially during child raising years, but that still doesn’t go very far in starting a business.

    Hardly ever discussed in the United States is the question of inheritance, which affects far more people than one would think.

    Some people get a tremendous financial leg-up early on in life if their parents own homes or life insurance policies and die young, giving them the potential to become rentiers.

    Others have parents who live forever and slowly deteriorate and become a financial liability. The cost of funerals in the USA is exorbitant.

    • Agree: Adam Smith
  47. Steve Hsu covered this concept years ago.

    physicist 1 spends his time trying to understand the finer details of how supernova explosions work.

    physicist 2 spends all his time trying to get physicist 1 fired.

    who will be working in this department 5 years from now?

    the people with more money than you (a lot more money, 2 orders of magnitude) pay the physicist 2 guys of the world well to monitor and report on physicist 1 guys.

    no actual work is going to get done. prosecuting the ideological rigidity of the money people is what is going to get done. eventually only physicist 2 guys are left. hence the lower intelligence level of the National Review staff now, or the lack of any bench in the Republican party.

    • Agree: Renard
  48. J.Ross says:

    OT — The good news is that the failures in DC are failing. The latest Simplicius is both deliriously good news and must be read, as has become standard. Well-known Putin stooges at that Trumpian rag, The Washington Post (“Democracy Dies in Darkness”), have quoted an anonymous Kiev bureaucrat to the effect that the war criminal Zelensky not only lied about Ukrainian casualty figures, but had to, to protect flagging and desperate press-gang efforts. Russia advances on every important front while exhausted sacrificial goyim melt away like the surrendering 115th or the dying, rest-denied 47th. And there’s this gem: the Ukraine doesn’t want what men it has training abroad because it’s afraid they will live.

  49. This is definitely for Steve. The decline of the New York Times, encapsulated in just one phrase:

    ‘Wally, an emotional support alligator…’

    • LOL: Liza
  50. J.Ross says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    What Christiamity needs is the protection of a Catholic-Pagan syncretist population, which would after all reflect the historical reality of Christendom, and allow the Church to be kept to its promises, and give it leeway beyond its natural restrictions. What it does not need is female clergy, gay marriages, and communist Popes.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
  51. J.Ross says:
    @MEH 0910

    Thank you for archiving. Archiving defeats censorship and confounds click-counting.

  52. The campus protests are showing something encouraging about man’s nature: At least some of those youngsters have maintained the integrity of their minds, despite all the elite indoctrination, propaganda, gas lighting, bullying, shaming, cancellations & now threats of violent death to make them believe an absurd Opposite World fantasy about a certain country. They are the heroes in a real-life dystopian story, like the ones many of them probably grew up reading.

    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
  53. Brutusale says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Maine is out. The monied blow-ins in the Portland area hail mostly from Boston and New York, and Maine is strikingly different, politically, than the place where I called on clients for 25 years.

    It’s easy for malign actors to influence places like Maine. Soros invested all of $350K to elect the Cumberland Country (Portland area) DA, but that was a huge amount of money up there.

  54. Anon[265] • Disclaimer says:

    AnotherDad:

    Minorities run toward white nations, white neighborhoods, white institutions.

    Yes, crucially this is something that Jews have in common with blacks and browns.

    I’ve heard it argued (by Jews) that whites’ complaints about Jews are analogous to blacks’ complaints about whites – (complains which Jews have themselves substantially put into blacks’ heads). Jews argue that white resentment is a manifestation of “irrational jealously” or something. But if you actually listen to the antisemites’ complaints they center around Jewish parasitism and subversion.

    Furthermore, when you consider that Jews demand their attachment and inclusion into white societies, something which blacks and browns also demand – a demand which whites don’t reciprocate (quite the contrary) you see that the analogy doesn’t make any sense. Whites are not jealous of the parasites. They just want the parasites gone.

    Whites are perfectly happy to be left alone, whereas Jews need their white host, being that Jews have evolved a culture (and perhaps genetic nature) of obligate parasitism. Even Israel, a supposedly “successful experiment,” remains an obligate parasite on the United States and Western Europe still today.

    Notably, there is still no evidence that Jews are capable of building a functional and sustainable nation of their own anywhere ever in human history – certainly not since the destruction of the Second Temple (but even that’s debatable given how briefly that nation existed – see “the 80 year curse”*).

    Historically speaking, the average white has rarely wanted or needed Jews around. Attitudes changed somewhat post-WWII, especially with Jewish full spectrum media capture. The Jews have been able to condition whites to love their Jewish masters (as did Stalin and as does Kim Jong Un – slaves are often conditioned to love their masters, Stockholm syndrome style).

    The regular peasant folk have a long and rich history of kicking Jews out, only for a forgetful or treasonous noble to invite the Jews back in again after a couple centuries, often to do some dirty and unethical job for which they need a ruthless mercantile and/or mercenary force.

    Blacks and browns are, similarly, invited into white countries at the behest of treasonous business interests who want to undercut wages of their working classes. That’s basically what black slavery was – plantation owners undercutting the wages of the Southern white working class – and now blacks refuse to go back because they have it so good.

    Blacks and browns demand proximity to whites so as to benefit from the institutions that whites have built and to parasitize off of the social safety nets whites created. And so do Jews. The difference, however, is that Jews form a parasitic overclass, and blacks and browns form a parasitic underclass. But they’re both parasites and they both make the host country worse.

    Whites resent Jews for substantially the same reason that whites resent blacks and browns: They’re parasites who harm their country and way of life.

    *
    https://mizrachi.org/hamizrachi/the-curse-of-the-eighth-decade/
    https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/news-bulletin-reports/731430/impending-fate-of-israel-the-curse-of-the-eighth-decade/en

    • Thanks: res
  55. Muggles says:

    The very notion of “anti White racism” is now receiving some public airing and attention.

    And not just on Unz or “far right” outlets.

    The very use of the term is increasing, and that is its real power.

    When people start “daring to mention its name” then it must shrink and hide in the darkness.

    Denial simply can’t erase this evident fact and policy.

    When they are denying it exists, we are winning the debate.

  56. Rick P says:
    @Hypnotoad666

    There are two separate issues here. The antisemitism bill might be a problem on free speech grounds, but that is separate from the fact that Israel has every right to root out the terrorists who raped and murdered over a thousand Israelis, however long it takes.

  57. On TV, it’s non-controversial
    to put blacks in every commercial.
    But why the inflation
    of representation?
    I’m asking you, Hymie and Herschel.

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/advertising#:~:text=In%20few%20modern%20industries%20have,of%20the%20modern%20advertising%20agency.

  58. Goddard says:

    I like this column. A new Sailer Strategy.

  59. Why has racist enmity against whites become so acceptable? There are multiple reasons, but I think the most important driver is that the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes.

    I’ve long considered the beginning of the period of mask-off, anti-white animus to be launched by Susan Sontag 1967’s quote of the white race being the cancer of human history. Of course, she was just articulating what was already bubbling underneath. And of course this was all happening in an essentially all-white populace. I.e., seems like explaining anti-white racism in terms of needing to glue together a coalition of the fringes (which is thanks only to Hart-Celler, itself a manifestation of thinly cloaked anti-white animus) is a case of attaching the cart to the front of the horse, no?

    I.e., it’s long been acceptable to those in power and their sycophants; we’re now just at a point where there aren’t enough cognizant whites left to give the anti-whites any reason to worry about a popular uprising anymore.

    • Agree: AKAHorace
  60. Hence, conservatives tend to be terrified that they will say anything racially insensitive that might mess up their high school football team’s chances.

    More like they’re correctly terrified this will get them canceled, costing them their jobs, careers, social circles and sooner or later very possibly their lives. Ditto their family members who are often swept up in that to further punish crimethinkers. We can all name examples of this.

    You’re also assuming a bunch of cuckservatives don’t generally agree with the Left when it comes to the bulk of the whites in the US, that’s part of why many hate Trump. That’s before we even consider their status and social circles which in many cases are irredeemably anti-white, if for no other reason than Jewish influence or outright control. Which then spills over into jobs and careers. Or for another denigrating name, see “kosher conservatism.” Which yesterday went so far as to declare the New Testament beyond the pale.

    The ideas that Jews will change their minds about whites strikes me as ludicrous. When has that ever happened in history after they lost their battle with white Christians after the early middle ages?? Sure, they can make alliances, as they did with powerful whites in that period when they were competitive and afterwords, but they’re otherwise historically stiff necked on the concept of xenophilia. If we can believe psychologists (we can’t) this is innate, can be seen in babies.

    So from my reading of history and observations of the US since the 1970s, I predict they won’t stop their anti-white crusade no matter how bad their prospects and situation gets in the US. There’s something real behind the “109” meme….

    • Replies: @Seneca44
  61. AceDeuce says:

    One of the most important but least mentioned developments over the last 10 to 12 years has been the growth in respectability of anti-white hate. …

    Bullschitt. It has gone open and unchecked for 50 years. It’s only the past few years that some former mainstream cucks woke (pardon the expression) TF up and started whining about it. Even then, they’re in the minority among Whites. Some of us raised hell about it decades ago and were ignored, banned, told to “go back to Stormfront”.

    And the above-mentioned current normie White “outrage”, when it occurs at all, takes the form of some pissy little ripostes like:

    “Imagine if the races were reversed”,

    “black people can’t be racist, dontcha know?”,

    “Thanks, Obama–race relations were great before you took office, and now look.” (LOLOLOLOL)

    or else they debunk some phony “We Wuz Kangz” post by a negro idiot.

    All well and good, but while they have their little “touché ” moment, the negroes and their allies are marching forward right past them to do whatever TF they want, not giving half a crap about the conservacucks’ pathetic “gotcha!” moment.

    No one’s going to save us–the retards pining for Rooftop Koreans or for tacobreaths to get rid of blacks make me sick. If enough White people get on their hind legs, and, shall we say, “make a fuss”, we can “be the change we want to see”. If we can’t or won’t or don’t, we deserve to be in the dumpster of history.

  62. Anonymous[278] • Disclaimer says:

    No, Steve.
    It’s far more insidious and deeply engrained than this ‘coalition of the fringes’ Democrat Party strategy that you cite. It is more in the nature of a religious cult and the outward displays of sanctimony that fanatics need to show in order to display their fidelity to that cult. As ever, Nietzsche got it right, ‘Insanity is rare in the individual, but exceedingly common in the collective’.
    Basically, the essence of this cultus is the worship and sanctity of the Black Man as God’s Vicar on Earth. Next to the supreme god, come the phalanx of holy beings, women, gays, dark skinned persons in general. In the Manichean duality of this cultus, good can only exist in relation to its counterpoint, evil. Evil is the white man.
    The fascinating thing about this cult is that the evil ones happen to hold simultaneously the roles of the enablers and facilitators of the gods rampages on earth, the creation of all material wealth and being the biggest dumbest fool’s going – so much for the evil ones power.
    What’s more the designated gods have the guile to trick the evil ones into doing the gods work for them.
    In this religion, and only in this religion, the designated devils are the most pathetic wankers going and hardly worthy of the title ‘devil’. Incidentally, this fact is enough in itself to prove to the wise that this religion is nothing but a pile of pig manure.

  63. @Hypnotoad666

    The republican party is worse than useless. Trump made many promises, but only delivered on a few of them. Of course his rich jew donors got what they wanted, but the regular White working-class Americans who voted for him, not so much.
    The only (fairly) recent republican worth a damn was Pat Buchanan. Unlike Trump, he was a true America Firster. I went to a Buchanan event in I believe 1996 (or thereabouts), and of course those jew terrorists the JDL were there to cause trouble.
    Jesus were they smelly.

  64. Art Deco says:
    @Mark G.

    Most Whites are productive individuals who would benefit from a free market economy, the elimination of affirmative action in private industry and government, and shrinking a large welfare state that involves disproportionately transferring wealth from Whites to minorities.
    ==
    Actually, the welfare state we have is oriented more than anything toward benefits for the elderly and disabled, who are not disproportionately minority.
    ==
    The large programs are Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and public schooling. Medicaid, which is means tested, is disproportionately minority. Public schools are as well, but that’s a function of whites having lower fertility rates.
    ==
    The program sets of middling size are SNAP and other nutrition programs, housing subsidies, SSI, and unemployment compensation. The ratio of minorities to others is highest among the housing subsidy programs, less pronounced among nutrition programs, not all that pronounced in re SSI and unemployment compensation.
    ==
    For the most part, the ratio of minorities to whites is a function of how the income stratification varies between the two subpopulations. The demographics of the beneficiary population are not what makes programs troublesome. The incentives incorporated in how they operate is what is troublesome.
    ==
    You’ve also conflated in your heading two separate sets of question. A market may operate with private producers and without a vexatious tangle of regulations even though you have redistribution among potential consumers.

  65. And let’s make sure not to let the Biden administration concoct a new Middle Eastern and North African racial category for the national census that might reassure Jews that they can safely engage in what I call “flight from white,” or the disavowal of white identity when it becomes inconvenient.

    Respectfully disagree here, Steve.

    In some ideal world, the census box would be “American” or “Foreigner”. Maybe you’d have the traditional “Native American Indian” or even “American black” and “Everyone Else”. But we are way–way, way, way–past all that now.

    What the new system does–at least the preview of it–is allow a full ethnic breakout:
    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24521639-revisions-to-ombs-statistical-policy-directive-no-15-standards-for-maintaining-collecting-and-presenting-federal-data-on-race-and-ethnicity#document/p37/a2444381

    I’ve got some extended thoughts here:
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/bo-winegards-review-of-noticing-in-aporia/#comment-6491380

    But basically, I think the more detailed ethnic data actually helps fracture “the coalition of the fringes”. Indians and Chinese properly separated can spar. The Filipino can complain that the Indians and Chinese are hogging all the loot and where’s his spot at Harvard? The MENA category lumps the Arabs in with the Jews–LOL. How much fun is that? And if American Jews try and pile in, how much good is the category to Arabs/Muslims at all?

    And to the issue of Jews fleeing from white? C’mon. Jews have been “white” in the US forever and how much loyalty to white Americans has that engendered from them?

    Rather, the standard Jewish MO has been pushing “diversity”–like AA and near quotas for blacks–while hiding their own very outsized over-representation under the “white” share. You’d have a NYT editorial lineup that would be one token black, an Irish gal, a white Protestant guy and six Jews … denouncing “white privilege”.

    Seriously, with diversity comes contention–it’s baked in. Whites are better off if we rip the mask off these scams and see what’s what. Heck, Jews have insisted on their exquisite separate peopleness, give them their own checkbox and let everyone look at the numbers. What’s Harvard’s student body actually look like with everyone’s ethnicity “out”. Who is actually “under-represented”?

    Let’s break it all out and count everyone. Let everyone squabble over the spoils. And the minoritarian parasites can explain why uniquely the descendants of the people who actually built America are the one ethnic group you can piss on.

    The sooner we move out from the cover of the minoritarians toxic “oppression” scam and on into the sunshine of honest sharp elbows ethnic politics the better. Whites will find allies and manage in that milieu just fine.

    • Thanks: Renard, Gordo
  66. @Art Deco

    “Public schools are [disproportionately minority] as well, but that’s a function of whites having lower fertility rates.”

    No, it is a function of out-of-control non-stop immigration, unwelcome and unwanted, and forced on the American people by a government which hates them.

    Without non-stop immigration, whites might have low fertility for a generation or two, leading to… comfortably populated, non-overcrowded schools, where kids could get a proper education while feeling safe. Housing costs/rents would drop, neighborhoods would be coherent and liveable, clogged hospitals would not be going bankrupt from treating floods of foreign paupers for free. And in that context, family formation would eventually bounce back, and whites would have higher fertility again. It is a self-correcting cycle, when left to its own devices, without the monkey-wrench of a non-stop flood of unwelcome and unreachable mooching foreign beggars.

    This is just another lie brought to you by your favorite tribe of liars trying to paper over their endless crimes against this country.

    • Agree: OilcanFloyd
  67. Mark G. says:
    @Art Deco

    There is a difference between programs people pay into, like Social Security and Medicare, and other programs people do not pay into like Medicaid and various other welfare programs. Since non-Asian minorities have lower incomes than Whites, they qualify for and use these programs more than Whites.

    Whites have yearly household incomes of 82 thousand dollars versus 62 thousand for Hispanics and 52 thousand for Blacks. Because of the progressive nature of the income tax system, Whites pay more. The progressive income tax system has the effect of transferring wealth to poorer minorities. Affirmative action also leads to a massive income transfer to minorities.

    If minorities did not benefit from big government, you would see them voting for Republican small government types. They do not do that. Only Whites do that. If Whites benefitted from having Blacks and Hispanics around, you would not see them trying to move away from them.

    • Agree: Goddard, OilcanFloyd
    • Thanks: Renard
  68. Renard says:
    @Rick P

    Israel has every right to root out the terrorists who raped and murdered over a thousand Israelis, however long it takes.

    You left out the part where Israel is killing 100,000 people (counting those under the rubble) — mainly women and children — who had absolutely nothing to do with the Oct 7 incursion. Which itself was a trivial pinprick compared with what Israel has been dealing out for decades. Yeah, you left a few things out.

    • Agree: OilcanFloyd, Gordo
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    , @Reg Cæsar
  69. This is not to say that racist anti-white violence is currently running amok on the streets. Indeed, black-on-white murders peaked way back in 1980, during the powder cocaine boom.

    Well, I can point out that perhaps the main reason in the decline of interracial, black-on-white murders since 1980 was the continuation and acceleration of whites decamping to suburbs, which is to say removing themselves from large concentrations of blacks, and ordering their other affairs to minimize such conduct. As I think you have pointed out before, this seems to have led to a tradeoff of reduced violent crime victimization in favor of motor vehicle deaths. Whites would rather have drank a few Martinis and wrapped themselves around an oak tree after Happy Hour than be pistol whipped, robbed, and shot by Jamal.

    A stone Tudor home on a jumbo mortgage with an ornamental turret on a cul-de-sac with no sidewalks, where friends drop in by appointment only – only for one or two now, don’t want to get pulled over – and the loss of social, fraternal, and religious institutions built by their grandparents was the price. Large screen televisions got cheaper, and cable television added hundreds of new channels over this time – eventually the flat screen televisions help to disguise the nail pops on the large, bare gypsum walls. Junior has his own room where he can indulge his weird hobbies and interests free from human contact. I wonder what will become of him? He respects women, I am told, because he has such a strong female role model in his mother, who works sixty hours a week commuting to the office park. But now he’s painting his fingernails and wearing girl’s underwear – oh well, it’s probably just a phase.

    All whites had to do to stop being murdered so much was to become prisoners in their gilded cages.

    Further, there has been a major falloff over the generations in robbery-murders. Mugging pedestrians and knocking over liquor stores have declined as credit cards have replaced cash.

    I also think it is the ubiquity of cameras and proactive policing that put an additional dent in robberies. Again, the price of safety was freedom and a bit of humanity.

    Since about 2001 or so, the importation of battlefield trauma techniques Stateside has probably hidden many murders when you look at trends over time – I think a significant number of people who would have died in 1985 from a gun shot wound would live in 2015 with the same gun shot wound. Those people become assaults in the numbers and not murders, so some number of robbery-assaults are equivalent to robbery-murders in 1980.

    • Agree: OilcanFloyd
    • Thanks: Goddard, The Anti-Gnostic
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    , @Lowry Smith
  70. @Alec Leamas (working from home)

    Since about 2001 or so, the importation of battlefield trauma techniques Stateside has probably hidden many murders when you look at trends over time – I think a significant number of people who would have died in 1985 from a gun shot wound would live in 2015 with the same gun shot wound. Those people become assaults in the numbers and not murders, so some number of robbery-assaults are equivalent to robbery-murders in 1980.

    Well said.

  71. J.Ross says:
    @Rick P

    Not an argument here: my criticizing their government does nothing to impede or jeopardize their state terrorism efforts, and well before the Ban the Bible act, “my” government stood ready to see that public opinion had no effect on policy. Jews have this thing, David Irving called it “Are We Powerful Or What,” where they make themselves as ugly as possible and then realize too late that they’re going the wrong way. The Ban the Bible act doesn’t help Israel in any way, and one clear way it threatens Israel is by waking up unprecedented numbers of normies.

  72. @Arclight

    Rod Dreher, who was born and raised in Louisiana, writes about the Baton Rouge split here:

    https://roddreher.substack.com/p/st-george-and-the-dragon-of-race

  73. Granted, there’s a ruthless logic to the Democrats’ tactics. But those tactics are also hard to defend ethically.

    It’s not hard to defend ethically if the ethics which govern the defense are those held dear by the ruling class as promulgated by the American academy, news and entertainment media, and increasingly the law and State and Federal governments themselves.

    It’s quite simple that whites are the villains of history, uniquely responsible by blood for all “oppression” on Earth, and deserving of diminishment in numbers and power until extinction. Oprah Freakin’ Winfrey said as much.

    For the time being, the Democrats are in a quandary because a bare majority of the electorate proceeds from different ethical priors. They need older white voters who scratch their heads and asses and wait until the last week before the election to “pick the better man for the job based on his qualifications” to remain in a state of somnambulance for a few more years until the new electorate comes on line, and its ethics do not find stealing from whitey because he got what you ain’t got to be an ethical problem.

    • Agree: Goddard
  74. Elsewhere says:

    The conventional wisdom in America has become that the human race is divided into two kinds of identities: the Good ones (i.e., Democratic-leaning) and the Bad ones (Republican-leaning).

    This is a nice restatement of Elsewhere’s rule. It’s neat to see my flash of insight three years ago be referred to now as “conventional wisdom”.

  75. “Granted, there’s a ruthless logic to the Democrats’ tactics. But those tactics are also hard to defend ethically.”

    They don’t care. They only believe in “The End Justify the Means.” It is emblematic of a party that has gone full utilitarian through a process dates back at least to FDR’s first term when, in the face of a world-wide economic depression and the perceived threat posed by communism and fascism, a decision was made to place the government into the hands of Ivy-educated wizards who proceeded to create what would turn out to be the largest governmental bureaucracy in the history of Western Civilization. Henceforth, the Democrat party would be identified as the party of government–so much so that in reality it is they who have been the dominant political party in this country for the past 90 years. And that bureaucracy continues to grow unabated. The so-called “opposition party”, the Republican Party, brings nothing to the table and can no longer be taken seriously. Indeed, it appears as though they will suffer the same fate as the old Whig Party whom they displaced and drift into irrelevancy, leaving only one party standing.

    The late Sam Francis had both parties pegged when he called the Republican Party “stupid” and the Democrat Party “evil.” It appears at this juncture that the latter has emerged victorious. How this will all end is anyone’s guess, but it’s safe to say it won’t end well.

  76. One of the problems is- naming. You may go with -phobia, anti- & miso- (perhaps something more).

    Leukophobia? Sounds silly.

    Anti-Caucasianism? Hmmm….not sure.

    If we include “Europe”, that is ambiguous. Anti-Semitism is also ambiguous, but since the 19th C, it caught on. Anti-Europoidism/Europeanism is not emotionally charged enough.

    In English, anti-whitism could work. Or not.

    Aryan stuff is out of question because of Gypsies.

    • Replies: @mc23
  77. @The Anti-Gnostic

    by golly those Ashkenazi, Sephards and Mizrahi can rally as one behind the Nation of Israel when they need to.

    Important point.

    …Christians blew up the physical territory of Christendom. The Amish and Mennonites didn’t and that’s why they’re the ones with the positive TFRs.

    If by “blew up” you mean areal expansion, the Amish are indeed doing that. They take up more space than they did 20 or 30 years ago. TFRs are positive by nature– it’s when they exceed 2.1 that they “blow up”.

    Also, you can drop all the chest-thumping “I hate fags” talk.

    Such hatred is un-Christian. Recognizing “acts of carnal knowledge against the order of nature” (as the Zambian penal code puts it) as morally disordered and sinful is not. Francis just issued a somewhat contradictory statement opposing “gender ideology”– the white man’s (and woman’s) latest fad– so one, if not both, of these statements is being read the wrong way, or the Papacy is in Biden territory mentally. A mentally sound pontiff cannot change Church teaching; how could one in the throes of dementia?

    Your church already blesses homosexual unions.

    Not quite:

    https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/statement-usccb-vaticans-document-addressing-pastoral-blessings

    https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/doctrinal-dicastery-explains-how-when-gay-couples-can-be-blessed

    Is it the “union”, or the individuals in it, who are being blessed?

  78. @Reg Cæsar

    Is it the “union”, or the individuals in it, who are being blessed?

    Jesuitical.

  79. I have so much more respect for the South Pacific Islanders who worshipped Allied pilots as gods than I do for these self-described Christians:

  80. mc23 says:
    @AnotherDad

    From Aristotle to Aquinas, a span of almost 2000 years, it has been observed that 3 generations are needed for immigrants to fully assimilate. Aristotle & Aquinas were European and they were dealing immigrants from nearby areas and of the same religion.

  81. @Prester John

    The late Sam Francis had both parties pegged when he called the Republican Party “stupid” and the Democrat Party “evil.” It appears at this juncture that the latter has emerged victorious. How this will all end is anyone’s guess, but it’s safe to say it won’t end well.

    The eminent James Kirkpatrick of VDARE formulated it better than Francis, updated for our current predicament:

    Remember – America is a corpse being devoured by maggots. The Democrats root for the maggots, the Republicans root for the corpse.

    • Agree: Renard, Liza
    • Replies: @Liza
  82. mc23 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Euro-ethnic should cover it. White is used to describe and attack European-ethnics.

    Euro-ethnic phobia? Not as succinct as I would like but it unites the largest number and more importantly those under attack

  83. Ralph L says:
    @guest007

    In the 70s, even the Democrats learned that high capital gains tax rates generate less revenue, decrease investment and risk-taking, and impede economic growth. It’s particularly harmful when most of the gains are just from inflation.

    • Agree: FPD72
    • Replies: @guest007
  84. @Reg Cæsar

    By “blew up Christendom,” I mean “utterly destroyed it over centuries of internecine warfare culminating in World War 2.” This isn’t hard to understand. Christianity has no rallying point because it has jettisoned Christendom and thus its collective consciousness.

    The Amish, by contrast, build their little Christendoms where they successfully reproduce themselves in their pews and could care less about whether anybody else is evangelized.

    Is it the “union”, or the individuals in it, who are being blessed?

    LOL. Thread that needle!

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/hoboken/sections/religions-and-spirituality/articles/catholic-church-to-hold-lgbtq-pride-mass

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Frau Katze
  85. @guest007

    The US collected $4.71 trillion in revenue in 2023. That’s plenty to run a country’s government. If you’re going in the red at $4.71 trillion a year you don’t have a revenue problem.

    So for starters: every Department after State, Treasury, Defense, Justice – gone. That’s 13 ultra vires and redundant Cabinet-level bureaucracies eliminated.

    Make do with 5 carrier strike groups. Close every overseas base, rename the Department of Defense the Department of War, and they can resume the classical role of national militaries in defending the national borders.

    Eliminate Medicare, Medicaid and VA. Introduce a comprehensive Singapore/German-style medical coverage system. $5K yearly deductible to keep everybody honest. Abolish the tort system–the tax on life–to pay for it.

    No aid to Ukraine, Israel or Taiwan. That’s what, 50 billion a year? In fact, no aid to anybody. Make your own countries great again. I’m sure there’s lots more picayune line items that will add up: NPR, the NEA, the NSF, Export-Import Bank, UN, NATO, World Bank, Amtrak, the USPS…

    The eliminated functions can devolve to the States and the bond markets can decide whether to fund them or not.

    • Replies: @Renard
    , @Arclight
    , @guest007
  86. Gabe Ruth says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Lol how long ago did you get baptized?

  87. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “By “blew up Christendom,” I mean “utterly destroyed it over centuries of internecine warfare culminating in World War 2.” This isn’t hard to understand.”

    False conclusion., “counselor”.

    “Christianity has no rallying point because it has jettisoned Christendom and thus its collective consciousness.”

    Nope. Try again.

    https://apnews.com/article/catholic-church-shift-orthodoxy-tradition-7638fa2013a593f8cb07483ffc8ed487

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  88. Corvinus says:

    “The right’s unwillingness to mount a coherent defense against racist anti-white animus “

    Begins with providing a clear, concise, example laden explanation of what constitutes “anti-white”.

    Which Mr. Sailer neglected to offer. Stay cagey!

  89. Art Deco says:
    @Renard

    Thanks for a fantasy so thorough even the Hamas’ PR people aren’t trying to peddle it.

    • Replies: @Renard
  90. @advancedatheist

    You’re mistaken. Those kids are not protesting for the same reasons Unz commenters would. They see the Israelis as white and the Palestinians as brown. That is all. They have no mental integrity or free thought as they have been taught that whites, and especially white colonialists, are bad.

    • Agree: CalCooledge
  91. Mactoul says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Individuals in it?

    In what?
    Union?
    So a union IS recognized.
    QED

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  92. ennui says:

    Predictions:

    1. Mike Johnson is reelected by the good people of Louisiana as are most of the GOP pols who voted for the recent bill.

    2. Jared’s father-in-law makes a lot of noise, but he does nothing.

    3. Unzites will ignore the significance of points 1 and 2 in their rush to blame US foreign and domestic policy on the two groups that collectively constitute less than 20% of the population.

    4. Inflation and standards continue to decline, the money continues to flow towards the Pentagon as long as diabetic boomers drag or crawl to the pols to vote for the chamber of commerce lizards who back Johnson

    The only hope right now is Jared’s father-in-law is mercurial enough that he causes parts of the agenda to be messed up. We can only enjoy the schaudenfreud from the discomfort he causes the PMC and bureaucrats.

  93. not fred says:

    The “Democratic Party”?

    Wonder who is in charge of that.

  94. @The Anti-Gnostic

    The Amish have a serious problem with recessive genetic disorders.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/genetic-disorders-hit-amish-hard/

    There’s a potential for a similar problem with ultra Orthodox Jews. They’ve got it pretty well under control with a system whereby everyone is tested as a teenager and the results are stored in a database. Prior to a potential marriage, the would be couple are checked to see if they are both carrying any one of a number of fatal recessive genetic conditions, like Tay Sachs. If they are, they are told “not a match.”

    See the book “Blood Matters” by Masha Gessen for more information about both groups.

    The Amish refuse to consider any such system.

  95. Renard says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    No aid to Ukraine, Israel or Taiwan. That’s what, 50 billion a year?

    It was more than that just last week.

    And “Defense” should be called Military, or War, or Offense. Nearly all of it is counter-productive at best.

  96. @Corvinus

    Are you a trad Catholic now?

  97. @J.Ross

    What Christianity needs is the protection of a Catholic-Pagan syncretist population, which would after all reflect the historical reality of Christendom, and allow the Church to be kept to its promises, and give it leeway beyond its natural restrictions.

  98. @Reg Cæsar

    Your church already blesses homosexual unions.

    Not quite:

    Is it the “union”, or the individuals in it, who are being blessed?

    Reg, you lying passive fagressive poofta, this is from your own source:

    VATICAN CITY (CNS) — A Catholic priest can bless a gay or other unmarried couple as long as it is not a formal liturgical blessing and does not give the impression that the Catholic Church is blessing the union as if it were a marriage, the Vatican doctrinal office said.

    The gay bishops you cite officially admit they are blessing gay couples and gay unions. They’re merely not calling it “marriage”. Yet.

  99. @Renard

    You left out the part where Israel is killing 100,000 people (counting those under the rubble) — mainly women and children — who had absolutely nothing to do with the Oct 7 incursion.

    Change “Israel” to “America” and “Oct” to “Dec”, and you have 1945.

    Women vote in Gaza, and they vote for Hamas, don’t they? Somebody does. Der schöne Adolf got the ladies’ vote in Dresden:

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  100. @Frau Katze

    True story: a Lebanese Christian who fought in a Falangist militia told me that the local priests told them they would not grant a Christian marriage to two people from the same village.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  101. Twinkie says:
    @Mark G.

    Be more precise. Where entitlements are concerned, it’s not white vs. nonwhite. It’s Asians (highest net tax payers) and whites (the second highest) vs. Hispanics (second to last) and blacks.

  102. Ian M. says:

    Good article, anti-white hatred is indeed what we should be drawing attention to, not simply generic ‘racism’.

    I agree that this anti-white hatred and related DIE phenomenon are not primarily the consequence of the Frankfurt school, even if the latter has influenced the former’s vocabulary and helped its ‘intellectual’ leaders frame things, and I also agree that courting votes from the Democratic client groups incentivizes the Democratic Party to demonize whites, but I do think there is a deeper ideological basis to the anti-white hatred and wokery that stems directly from liberalism:

    [MORE]

    Equal freedom is both the legitimizing foundation and the goal of liberalism. Yet things remain stubbornly and manifestly unequal. To admit that certain things might be unequal by nature would threaten the liberal project because it would suggest that there may be features that cannot be subsumed under the principle of equal freedom and would represent a potential rival principle for social organization. Liberalism likewise cannot itself be the cause of existing inequalities because this would demonstrate its incoherence and delegitimize it.

    Instead, liberalism insists that inequalities are socially constructed, the result of traditions and patterns of thought that have been shaped by institutions and the culture to privilege certain groups over others. Extant inequalities then are due to a privileged ‘oppressor’ group that uses these institutions to benefit themselves at the expense of underprivileged ‘oppressed’ groups. Since all humans are naturally equal, the fact that some groups are not equal in certain respects must be because they are being oppressed by some other group of people. The oppressor group represents an obstacle to equal freedom for the oppressed. To achieve equal freedom then, the oppressor group and their power structures must be weakened or eliminated.

    This framing helps to explain some of the apparently contradictory features of modern liberalism: many favored liberal policies that appear on their face to be antithetical to equality are in fact measures aimed to achieve true equality for oppressed groups by targeting at the oppressor group du jour that stands in the way of equal freedom. The current anti-white hysteria, for example, is a consequence of whites being regarded as the oppressor group, who benefit from inherited privileges and institutions that were originally shaped for their advantage.

  103. Ian M. says:

    …back in the days when white men like William F. Buckley, Jr., and Gore Vidal hissed at each other on network television…

    That was pretty funny.

  104. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Good idea. Neither the Amish nor the ultra Orthodox will consider abortion either.

    There’s a common severe hereditary disease in parts of the Mediterranean called beta thalassemia.

    It can be treated, sort of, with difficulty but is often fatal. It was common in Cypress. The Orthodox Christian priests finally approved abortion for beta thalassemia because they were going broke trying to treat it.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  105. @Frau Katze

    The Amish refuse to consider any such system.

    There is a wide spectrum of “Amish”. The ones who still refuse to put triangles on their buggies are a small minority., often in long-established areas– Geauga County’s, covered in the link, have been there since the 19th century. Hang around the taxi stands at Chicago’s train or bus station and you’ll see young families negotiating fares from one to the other. They have moved several states away precisely to avoid inbreeding, and are going home for a visit.

    See the book “Blood Matters” by Masha Gessen

    This book may be scientifically accurate, but Masha– “married” to Dasha, ain’t that cute?– is “non-binary”. Masha’s real contribution is removing “theirself” from the gene pool!

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  106. @Frau Katze

    It was common in Cypress. The Orthodox Christian priests finally approved abortion for beta thalassemia because they were going broke trying to treat it.

    One in six Cypriots carries the gene. That would mean one marriage in thirty-six would be affected. (Assuming it’s recessive. Most deadly genes are.) Genetic testing before marriage seems a less extreme solution than abortion. When did Orthodox priests become utilitarian Protestants?

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  107. Arclight says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Excellent points. The federal government is essentially a massive jobs program with millions of employees whose dues to public employee unions are funneled back to the Democratic Party, and on matters of policy accomplishes very little. The Department of Education is a prime target year after year because it has manifestly failed at its stated purpose, which in reality is actually a problem that cannot be solved by more dollars anyway.

    I think most people do not realize that there is no taxing our way out of this problem – Biden’s capital gains proposal would raise $2.2T over ten years, so it would solve about 10% of the annual deficit at our current level. All the billionaires in America have a combined net worth of about $4.4T, so confiscate that and you’ve covered our deficits for less than 3 years.

    Austerity is going to be imposed on us one way or another. Better we make choices now about what we could do without or at least less of rather than sudden and much more painful crash decisions. But the latter is what we will likely get, as one of the flaw of our system of government is that almost no one in federal office has concerns beyond the next election cycle and therefore we do almost no long term planning, certainly not when it comes to spending.

    • Agree: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Art Deco
  108. Seneca44 says:
    @That Would Be Telling

    “More like they’re correctly terrified this will get them canceled, costing them their jobs, careers, social circles and sooner or later very possibly their lives. Ditto their family members who are often swept up in that to further punish crimethinkers. We can all name examples of this.”

    OT, but along this same line lies a kernel of a great Trump political ad:

    A dinner party with a bunch of upper middle class white Karens and Brads where the subject turns to Trump and everyone sagely nods that Trump is a madman or, literally Hitler. One guy looks a little disillusioned. Then cut to him seeing Biden do some stupid or demented stuff and cut to a wave of invaders coming across the southern border. Then cut to him in the voting booth voting Trump while the voice over says: The ballot is still secret in the United States–only you know who you voted for.

    • Thanks: That Would Be Telling
    • Replies: @AKAHorace
    , @J.Ross
  109. @Alec Leamas (working from home)

    True, trauma treatment/techniques have advanced since 2000, let alone since 1990, so the murder rate in many ways has been brought down through medicine. Some studies indicate the murder rate would be 4 or 5 times higher but for these medical advances. Now, that seems a bit high to me, but even if only double the murder rate we’re talking about a huge number of people saved.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
  110. guest007 says:
    @Ralph L

    One did not answer what one would cut to keep from raising taxes. Given that all discretionary spending is equal to less than the current budget deficit, serious cuts would have to be made.

    • Replies: @Ralph L
  111. guest007 says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Idea of eliminating the National Parks, the Census Bureau, the National Weather Service, the National Institute of Health, or Customs and Border Protection is insane and will never happen. And the idea that the voters would tolerate eliminating veterans benefits, or Medicare is insane. Germany currently spend around 13% GDP on health care, the U.S. spends around 17% and that includes all of the money spent by non-Americans coming to the U.S. for healthcare. And many Americans do not really have the $5k per person to send before the first dollar is paid.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  112. res says:
    @Frau Katze

    They’ve got it pretty well under control with a system whereby everyone is tested as a teenager and the results are stored in a database. Prior to a potential marriage, the would be couple are checked to see if they are both carrying any one of a number of fatal recessive genetic conditions, like Tay Sachs. If they are, they are told “not a match.”

    But remember, “eugenics” is the worst thing ever.

    P.S. FWIW I think the Jews have it right here.

    • Agree: Frau Katze
  113. Art Deco says:
    @Arclight

    About 2% of the workforce consists of federal employees. Proportionate to the population, the military is as small as it has been since 1940. You can identify agencies and corporations which could be auctioned off or shut down (the Postal Service, Amtrak, the Department of Housing and Urban Development). However, what’s most notable is not the dimension of federal employment but the amount of grant money sloshing around and the resistance of Congress to putting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid on a more actuarially sound footing. (Interest charges are now exploding as well).

    • Replies: @res
  114. Dutch Boy says:
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Anti-white propaganda is used because it works. Lots of non-whites hate white people, a fact white people have a hard time coming to grips with. With an electorate increasingly non-white, you are going to see more, not less, of the anti-white rhetoric.

    • Agree: J.Ross
    • Replies: @Richard B
  115. res says:
    @Art Deco

    Here is a big part of the problem.

    Also interesting to look at the revenue side. I’m intrigued by how much they expect corporate taxes to increase in their projections.

    2015 era spending proportions.
    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/aug/17/facebook-posts/pie-chart-federal-spending-circulating-internet-mi/

    This article has details on government (both federal and state) spending and revenue in 1959.
    https://www2.census.gov/govs/pubs/govt_fin/1959_govt_fin.pdf

    • Thanks: Patrick in SC
    • Replies: @Dmon
  116. Not Raul says:

    I don’t think that senior officials in the Democratic Party are intentionally antagonizing white people in general. White people still make up over half of the electorate, and outside of solidly Republican areas, almost half of white voters vote for Democrats. Democrats need those votes to get elected (outside of certain majority minority House districts), and they know it.

    One reason why Trump isn’t in the White House is that he lost ground with white suburban voters between 2016 and 2020.

  117. @guest007

    I’ll pick one: the Border Patrol.

    First, it’s unionized which shouldn’t even be legal. Second, it doesn’t guard the border.

    Tell private citizens they’re authorized to use whatever force is necessary to repel trespassers. You will have all the volunteers you need for not one dime in taxes.

    • Replies: @guest007
    , @Hibernian
  118. @Lowry Smith

    Yep. If Jamal got gut shot in 1985, he was probably a dead man. Now he’s walking around with a colostomy bag for the rest of his life and we are paying for it.

    But, hey! Murder rates are down!

  119. @Reg Cæsar

    I didn’t know that about the Amish. Thanks for the update.

    As for Gessen, she is a Lesbian but i still found her book interesting. The main focus was on her being a carrier of a BRCA1 mutation: this greatly increases her chances of breast and ovarian cancer. Her mother died of breast cancer in her 40s.

    She eventually opts for a preventative double mastectomy.

    The BRCA1 mutation (dominant not recessive) is more common in Jews. But it also occurs in other groups: Angelina Jolie also carries it and had the same procedure.

    I suppose men would not be as interested in that particular mutation, although a man carrying the mutation can pass it to his daughters.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
    , @res
  120. @Reg Cæsar

    I don’t know much more about it I’m afraid.

  121. AKAHorace says:
    @Seneca44

    A dinner party with a bunch of upper middle class white Karens and Brads where the subject turns to Trump and everyone sagely nods that Trump is a madman or, literally Hitler. One guy looks a little disillusioned. Then cut to him seeing Biden do some stupid or demented stuff and cut to a wave of invaders coming across the southern border. Then cut to him in the voting booth voting Trump while the voice over says: The ballot is still secret in the United States–only you know who you voted for.

    Even better, include the ones loudly denouncing Trump in public voting for him. It would help Trump’s share of the vote and increase progressive paranoia.

  122. guest007 says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    If one going to have volunteers search vehicles crossing the borders? And what about those who illegally cross in urban areas such as San Diego, El Paso, Laredo, Brownsville, Nogales, etc.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  123. @Mactoul

    If a priest visits a prison and blesses the inmates, does that bless their crimes as well? When one is not in a state to take communion, one can simply cross one’s arms against one’s chest and receive a blessing. Does this bless their less-than-perfect state of grace?

    You guys love to rag on Jews, but can’t bring yourself to admit the bishops are right and the rabbis wrong about the unborn child.

    But it is that unborn child’s very existence that makes one “union” sacramental and the other a parody thereof.

    • Agree: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
  124. Ralph L says:
    @guest007

    I agree, but raising tax rates past a certain point doesn’t increase revenue, especially in the long term. We would be in much better shape now if Western governments had lowered punitive taxation rates decades earlier than the 80s instead of just lowering trade barriers. Perhaps we could have afforded both heavy industry and pollution control.

    Obviously, entitlements will have to change quite a bit [I’m 63 and planning accordingly], if not, the CPI will be jiggered more than it already is and benefits inflated away, the Argentinian path, the worst option IMO. Probably the only way to get Congress to disengage autopilot and do its job is for every rice bowl to take an equal hit, the sooner the better, but I would rather the Federal govt return to essentials.

    • Replies: @guest007
    , @guest007
  125. J.Ross says:
    @Seneca44

    That’s inaccurate by the way, it was changed under W and first used by Obama to do voter interest research. I was once at a invitation-only conference for Obamism in general. Talked to the interesting people sitting around the table, we quickly realized that we had nothing in common. As soon as was possible we asked the speaker how they had determined who to invite. She said, we know you all voted for Obama, but had not been consistent Democrat voters before that. The room went dead silent. None of us knew that was allowed. Eventually, someone asked if that wasn’t, y’know, illegal. She said something about a law being changed.
    The reason we are in the mess we are in is, the Vindmans and Mayorkases who actually run the country have ridiculous confidence in themselves, not too much familiarity with or affection for our actual system, and the bravery to just go ahead and change whatever they don’t like.

    • Replies: @res
    , @Reg Cæsar
  126. @Reg Cæsar

    If a priest visits a prison and blesses the inmates, does that bless their crimes as well?

    No; the inmates have been caught and are paying penance to the state. Do priests bless abortion clinics?

    But it is that unborn child’s very existence that makes one “union” sacramental and the other a parody thereof. [e.a.]

    So why is your church, to your approval, blessing a parody of a sacrament? Seems satanic.

  127. TrumpWon says:

    The more the left rails against whites, and all the parasitic non-whites that have infested this nation join them in hating us, the more I want them all out of here. It IS a white nation; it was created BY whites, FOR whites, using white ideas, white labor, white risk, white sacrifice, white bravery. There isn’t a single aspect of the founding of this nation that was enabled by non-whites, and thus, in my view, they have no right to be here.

    This is my opinion, so it can’t be wrong. Some commie cuck tried to tell me blacks were critical to the founding of the nation, of course this was yet another fact-free, evidence-free claim, like every defective argument put forth by communists.

    Revising history, telling lies, oppressing or criminalizing the truth – that is what commies do. And that’s why we need to eradicate them from the face of the earth. We can start right here at home.

    Americans used to have to go to some humid snake infested jungle halfway around the planet to fight commies – we won’t even have to leave the state.

  128. Hibernian says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    It seems some of the most pro and anti Nazi areas were Catholic. Very pro but not very anti in East Prussia.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  129. Hibernian says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    The agents want to do their job. The best thing is to tell them to go ahead.

  130. Dmon says:
    @res

    There’s mandatory and there’s mandatory. Simply controlling the border would have a huge, cascading effect on federal and state health care spending. The Feds mandate free sh!t, invite everyone in the world to glom onto it without paying in, then claim there’s no way they can cut spending.

    And when all else fails, P.J. O’Rourke expounded O’Rourke’s Rule of Circumcision : You can take 10% off the top of anything.

    https://thehill.com/latino/3948523-biden-to-announce-medicaid-obamacare-access-for-daca-recipients/

  131. @Hibernian

    It seems some of the most pro and anti Nazi areas were Catholic.

    No, the strongest NSDAP support appears to be concentrated in Protestant enclaves of the Catholic regions of Bavaria and the Rhineland. Hitler is the new Luther!

    Very pro but not very anti in East Prussia.

    The Protestant/Catholic divide is very evident there.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  132. @Frau Katze

    Was Angelina’s mother Quebecois of French decent?? Some genetic diseases common in shekelnazis are also common among French decent Quebecois.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  133. res says:
    @Frau Katze

    BRCA mutations affect cancer risk in men as well.
    BRCA Mutations in Men: Three Things to Know
    https://www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-blog/2023/may/men-with-brca

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
  134. res says:
    @J.Ross

    Did she say anything about how exactly they knew? I would be very interested in knowing exactly which law she meant.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
  135. @guest007

    I promise you those details can work themselves out. Many hundreds of thousands of Americans will happily volunteer their time in rotating shifts to guarding the borders. All you need is a firearm and qualified immunity.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @epebble
  136. Wielgus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Franconia, whose main city is Nuremberg, was a mainly Lutheran area in predominantly Catholic Bavaria and also had a reputation for supporting Nazism.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  137. J.Ross says:
    @res

    Apparently there’s a process for certain bodies, not just anyone, but probably government offices or 501c3’s, to access the data, since they’re explicitly using it for political research and not making money. Something like who does and does not get to ask for your Social Security number. It was a big conference held in a big dining room at the Detroit Renaissance center, there were hundreds of people. You got a blue postcard with instructions to register online. I wish I had recorded exactly what she said.

    • Replies: @res
  138. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “I promise you those details can work themselves out. Many hundreds of thousands of Americans will happily volunteer their time in rotating shifts to guarding the borders. All you need is a firearm and qualified immunity.”

    Then use your alleged skill as a lawyer to make it happen. As you say, the details can be worked out. Go right ahead. I’m sure Mr. Sailer will let you recruit on this fertile ground of patriots. Make sure to photograph your experience when you get down there as proof of your exploits in shooting illegal varmints—especially those pesky kids—in the head.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  139. @Corvinus

    Kids can just be picked up and carried back, snowflake.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  140. @Wielgus

    Franconia, whose main city is Nuremberg…

    Middle Franconia. There are also Upper (Bayreuth) and Lower (Würzburg) Franconia. A tour guide at the Würzburg Residenz told us (in German) that “We may now be part of Bavaria, but are still Franconians in our hearts!”

    I’m told Nuremburg stands out as one of the best examples of a city in ruins bringing back their old, traditional streetscape, whereas Frankfurt went the opposite route, creating Chicago-am-Main. Würzburg, about halfway between the two, struck me as a blend of the two approaches.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  141. Richard B says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Anti-white propaganda is used because it works.

    As does any dissolving agent.

    The coalition is too doped in hate to see that propaganda is not of the slightest value in solving the many problems found in the social institutions they now control.

    It might be a way to acquire power. It won’t be the way to keep it.

    But the real problem, for them, is that the propaganda is not just used to crush whites, it’s real goal is to get the coalition placed above criticism – forever. They’re already there.

    So much so that they even have to manufacture “criticism” in the form of “hate”, because the “enemy” isn’t supplying them with enough to keep the whole scam going.

    The whole Coalition, or Supremacy Inc., is falling from the top of its Pyramid Scheme.

    As with anything in free fall the only resistance is gravity. And since gravity and acceleration are the same thing, well… So, yeah, anti-white propaganda works!

    It’s the dissolving agent eroding the foundations of Supremacy Inc.’s Pyramid Scheme.

  142. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Kids can just be picked up and carried back, snowflake”

    As they just watched mom and dad get gunned down. Nice touch making them orphans.

    So, about your involvement to bring your plan to fruition. Are you all in or are you all out?

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  143. @Santoculto

    According to Wikipedia Angelina’s mother, Marcheline Bertrand, does have some French-Canadian ancestry. She died at 56, suffering from both ovarian and breast cancer.

    The incidence of BRCA mutations has been studied amongst French Canadians, who had a relatively small founder population.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1377544/

  144. @res

    Thanks for the info and the links.

  145. @Corvinus

    Not taking your bait, snitch.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  146. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Not taking your bait, snitch”

    Then it’s a hard no on your part. Poser.

    • Troll: R.G. Camara
    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  147. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    I suppose framing this as Republican cowardice in the face of antiwhite animus is a degree above praising phony frat boys for “defending Old Glory” but the single most salient feature of what’s happening is the contrast between anti-Israel demonstrations now and the George Floyd freakout.

    First, BLM and outrage over Floyd’s death are pure bs: Black! lives are not devalued in a “systemically” racist system (no one devalues Black! life and life generally more than Black! Americans) and George Floyd, even if the victim of police abuse (he was not) does not constitute an example of that and his death was not even an individual outrage.

    On the other hand, Israel’s actions in Gaza are evil and sickening, however you want to characterize them. We are presently financing them and pathetically using no influence to lessen, much less stop the slaughter. The left is consistent in that it’s traditionally opposed to both “police violence” on one hand and war on the other and besides the reality that the antiwhite strain runs through all it does now, the BLM/Floyd protests were excessively violent and primarily antiwhite, while the Gaza protests are neither. Ironically enough, they are properly characterized as, yes, mostly peaceful. Almost entirely. And while in 2020 they burned down city centers and attacked whites on the streets while the cops were stood down almost everywhere, now we have overwhelming police reactions to students occupying libraries and quads.

    To characterize this as a battle between whites and antiwhites is, well…

    Steve used to characterize WASPs as “history’s winners”. Are they? Who are history’s winners, and what have they done to our country?

    • Agree: OilcanFloyd
    • Replies: @Anon
  148. Anon[244] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dennis Dale

    To characterize this as a battle between whites and antiwhites is, well…

    Is what?

    • Replies: @Dennis Dale
  149. Wielgus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Stuttgart also went the Chicago route. Its centre at any rate bears little resemblance to pre-war photos.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  150. Wielgus says:
    @Anonymous

    If this site was based in Europe, I suspect it would have been already.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  151. guest007 says:
    @Ralph L

    Two paragraphs and not one word about what should be cut. Anyone not willing to be very specific in discussing budget cuts is not really serious about controlling spending.

    • Troll: Ralph L
  152. @epebble

    Turns out, “Fight to defend other countries’ borders” is not a good recruiting slogan. Real countries have real borders and distinctive culture. Why get your legs blown off for an economic zone?

    • Replies: @epebble
    , @Reg Cæsar
    , @Mark G.
  153. @TrumpWon

    Blacks were not critical to the founding of the nation. Using them as a ready servant class was a mistake. However, as events transpired, blacks were integral to the founding of the nation. They were the earliest companions of the European settlers. Black were the hands that prepared the meals and Black the hand that rocked the cradle. American Blacks also have significant European admixture!

    Blacks are every bit as American as the Italian immigrants that came hundreds of years after them. They are far more American than any Eastern European. American Blacks, especially of the older generations, wear Anglo-American clothing and have Anglo-American names. Their contributions to American culture are at this point indelible.

    Use without love continues to curse the American project. Expecting to control a permanent Black underclass generates perennial political problems. In every case, abuse opens the way to destruction.

  154. @Wielgus

    Stuttgart also went the Chicago route. Its centre at any rate bears little resemblance to pre-war photos.

    It looks like Toronto– with a knockoff Space Needle!

    My stepgrandmother-in-law is from Stuttgart. She has Alzheimer’s now, so doesn’t have to look at that.

    I felt bad about linking Frankfurt to Chicago, as the latter invented skyscrapers and thus has a lot of old– i.e., pre-1940– and tasteful ones.

  155. @Wielgus

    If this site was based in Europe, I suspect it would have been already.

    Unless our Indic cynic critic Thomm is right, and it’s all controlled opposition.

  156. epebble says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Only a tiny fraction of the recruits care to know the slogans. Most are interested in benefits package during and after enlistment. Even tinier fraction gets their legs blown. Over a long period, death and injury rate in the armed services are usually smaller than in the corresponding civilian demographic. What is not debatable is the (non-)availability of volunteers to man a desert frontier. Heck, there were not enough votes in U.S. Congress to compel E-Verify – even when GOP had both houses and the White House. A national compulsory E-Verify would achieve 90% of what any strictest immigration restriction would achieve without a single ‘volunteer’ to man the borders. But GOP is opposed to that.

  157. res says:
    @J.Ross

    Thanks. My question has more to do with what information is collected, how, and with what justification than with how access is regulated. With data like SSNs (or taxes) the data is obviously there, it is just a matter of granting access. Voting data (I assume they mean actual votes rather than registration) is different.

  158. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Turns out, “Fight to defend other countries’ borders” is not a good recruiting slogan.

    “Why die for Danzig?”

    Though the man who came up with that slogan, Marcel Déat, “replaced class struggle by collaboration of classes and national solidarity, advocated corporatism as a social organization model, replaced the notion of “Socialism” by “Anti-capitalism” and supported an authoritarian state which would plan the economy and from which parliamentarism would be repealed.”

    In other words, except for his antiwar views, he’d have fit right in wth the Biden Administration!

    I was in central Danzig in 1985, and it looked like it hadn’t changed since Hanseatic days. If you’re going to die for someplace foreign, it’s as good as any.

  159. @J.Ross

    She said, we know you all voted for Obama, but had not been consistent Democrat voters before that. The room went dead silent. None of us knew that was allowed. Eventually, someone asked if that wasn’t, y’know, illegal.

    One has to wonder why, or even how, it is possible. As Tom Scott explains below, voting has to be anonymous to have any claim to legitimacy. This is why it is illegal in some places– and should be in all– to take a selfie with your ballot before depositing it. Proof of vote enables both purchase and threat.

    That is of Hurricane Sandy vintage; his equally skep sceptical update is here. Of course the comments are full of reassurances that all is hunky dory, and Scott doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Like we should believe these people.

    All election systems should be assumed guilty until proven otherwise. доверяй, но проверяй!

    This is Scott’s brief list of what’s illegal in UK elections. They pretty much all look legal here.

  160. Dennis Dale says: • Website
    @Anon

    I mistakenly took this as Steve taking up the current theme casting the anti-Zionist protests as primarily antiwhite. It turns out Steve didn’t mention them here, so I’m a dummy.
    I was premature.

    That’s never happened to me before.

    But to answer your question, it would be silly.

  161. guest007 says:
    @Ralph L

    There is nothing trollish about asking for specific when it comes to budget cuts. And anecdotes are not the answer. There is a $1.7 trillion dollar annual budget deficit. Please list the cuts that one is willing to make and have any chance of succeeding politically.

    And inflation does not solve anything when a country is paying interest on $26 trillion in privately held debt.

  162. Mark G. says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Fight to defend other countries’ borders is not a good recruiting slogan.”

    When the isolationist Ron Paul ran in the Republican primaries in 2012 he received more military donations than any of the other Republican candidates and also more than Obama. The military, both the military and civilian side, has traditionally been the most appealing to conservative small town White males who just want to defend this country.

    As one of those small town Whites who went to work for them way back in 1981, I would not encourage any White male to join today. You will face reverse discrimination, be forced to listen to woke propaganda, may have to get an inadequately tested vaccine to help boost big pharma profits, and possibly be sent off to die in a neocon war. A lot of White males already know this, which is why the military is having recruiting problems.

  163. @guest007

    “anecdotes are not the answer. There is a $1.7 trillion dollar annual budget deficit. Please list the cuts that one is willing to make”

    Everything that has anything at all to do with negroes, Latinos and Jews would be a good start. Then we can start really talking.

    • Replies: @guest007
  164. MEH 0910 says:

    NYT:
    https://archive.ph/dS0bW

    Biden Condemns a ‘Ferocious Surge’ of Antisemitism in the United States
    President Biden’s speech at a Holocaust remembrance ceremony came during weeks of protests on U.S. college campuses against Israel’s war in Gaza.
    May 7, 2024
    […]
    Jewish groups have been pressuring the administration to take firmer policy steps to combat antisemitism on college campuses, in particular. On Tuesday, the Biden administration fulfilled some of those requests.

    The Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights released new guidance to every school and college outlining examples of antisemitic discrimination, as well as other forms of hate, that could lead to investigations for violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

    The law prohibits discrimination based on race, color and national origin, and the department has interpreted it as extending to Jewish students. Since the Oct. 7 attack, the department has opened more than 100 investigations into complaints about antisemitism and other forms of discrimination. The administration also announced that the Department of Homeland Security would also offer new resources, including an online campus safety resource guide.

  165. guest007 says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Once again, no specifics, and not anywhere close to getting to $1.7 trillion. And last, not possible politically. A politician who would publically use a word like “negros” would have zero chance of getting any policy adopted.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by iSteve, at whim.


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World