The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
NYT: Racial Slurs Are Clever as Long as They Demean White Women
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the New York Times news pages:

Will It Take a Clever Acronym to Stop Racially Motivated 911 Calls?

A San Francisco politician thinks a new bill — named the “CAREN Act” — could be what it takes to get people’s attention, and limit potential harm.

By Evan Nicole Brown
July 24, 2020

The stories showed up in Shamann Walton’s social media feeds with alarming regularity: An eight-year-old selling water to raise money to go to Disneyland. A family barbecuing food on a charcoal grill near Lake Merritt. A man bird watching in Central Park. A woman sitting, leisurely, on a public bench in Manhattan. All of these activities — and several more like them — had been reported to law enforcement, often by strangers passing by.

In elementary school, these 911-dialers might have been labeled a tattletale. Today, a more widely used term is “Karen”: It’s internet shorthand for a white woman who embodies entitled “Can-I-speak-to-the-manager?” energy, cloaking prejudice in feigned innocence and concern.

Mr. Walton, who is a Democrat on the San Francisco board of supervisors, is well aware that this behavior can lead to real consequences for Black Americans: They are disproportionately likely to be killed by the police, according to analysis by the news media and academic research.

Enter Karen. Or CAREN. Mr. Walton recently proposed a new ordinance, named the “CAREN Act,” to discourage and penalize people for making racially motivated 911 calls without reasonable suspicion of a crime.

Most municipal bills are a little less catchy, burdened by phrases like “planning code.” But Mr. Walton’s proposal speaks to the meme-ified trope those who are online can readily identify.

He wouldn’t comment specifically on the ordinance’s wink of a name — which stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies — or talk about how many drafts he went through before landing on this acronym. He did note the dangers represented by the “Karen” meme, and this ordinance certainly gathered more national attention than other board of supervisors business, whether that was the intention or not.

 
Hide 100 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies!

    No 911 for you!

    • Replies: @TelfoedJohn
    @Anonymous

    Best comment from that video:


    This would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions of the Black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature make them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their dedication to exceptional civic values, stable traditional families, parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture and their unflagging pride in maintaining exemplary clean, neat and orderly homes. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Property values are boosted and energized by the entry of African Americans into an area thanks to the caring and sincere respect they show for these communities, their absolute dedication to lives of law abiding peaceful neighborliness, and the examples of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self improvement by hard work and a self-reliant, can-do culture of integrity and honor. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    , @uman
    @Anonymous

    Father and daughter are Mexican.

  2. Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites’ mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    • Agree: Abe, ben tillman
    • Thanks: Jane Plain
    • Troll: RichardTaylor
    • Replies: @Lowe
    @Jesse

    What are you talking about? Shamann Walton is black. If bills like this demonstrate anything, it's that most blacks dislike white women.

    Also if every man on the SF board voted for this bill, what would that mean to most white women? That blacks AND homosexuals don't like them.

    , @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    Some of them are truly shocked to discover Black and Latino women don't really like them. And while men of Color want to tap that White body, they mostly don't like them as people either.


    I notice it's often the pretty White women who are gobsmacked the most. They've always been treated as goddesses. But plain White women are often much more realistic. They don't always get the special breaks. So give them the compassion.

    Replies: @Jesse, @dfordoom, @Alden

    , @Anon
    @Jesse

    Like a typical leftist, you are doing the exact thing you claim to be against: creating division.

    People who talk like this were never on our side anyway. It's called concern trolling. That's why you need 45,000 different screen names, to try and divide the red-pill movement among the goyim.

    Just go away. You aren't part of our thing. You are a nuisance. You will not be missed and you contribute nothing except drama and whining. BYE

    Replies: @Jesse

    , @Alden
    @Jesse

    The misogynist women hating MEN OF UNZ will be sure to donate to Shamamm Walton’s next campaign. And the next and the next till he becomes governor or at least Congress critter as soon as that evil Karen Pelosi retires.

    Replies: @MBlanc46

    , @Pop Warner
    @Jesse

    It wasn't racial unity that kept Hillary out, Trump got a smaller share of the white vote than Romney did. Had there been racial unity Trump would have won at least 2/3 of whites and completely blown out Hillary

    , @ben tillman
    @Jesse


    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites’ mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.
     
    Enough trolling. There are no white men in Steve's post.
    , @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    Nobody thinks White men are driving the anti-White woman fashion. You don't either.

    But both White men and White women need to learn, they only have each other.

  3. Why do they have to f*** up all the names?

  4. How about Kitty Genovese Act?

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Rob McX

    "How about Kitty Genovese Act?

    Instead of the name "Karen," they should use the name "Channon."

    One wonders if the NY Times cohort have an opinion on what happened to the real-life young woman named Channon.

  5. In Jewish-run “new” America, Blacks insult White women by calling them “Karen.”

    In Gentile-run “old” America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them “boy.”

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that “boy” was out of style.

    Whites and Blacks struggling for “alpha male” dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they’d react.

    • Thanks: kikz
    • LOL: IHTG
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Good. Keep it that way.

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/sudanese-face-expulsion-minister-declares-israel-belongs-white-man/11394

    Sudanese face expulsion; minister declares Israel “belongs to white man”

    https://africasacountry.com/2012/09/the-white-man-comment

    On the 'white man' comment by Israel's Interior Minister, Eli Yishai. (He implied that Israel was a white country in a debate about immigration.)

    , @bomag
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Thanks for the video.

    Good to know there is some sanity in the world.

    , @anon
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima are nicer names to generically call Black persons.

    , @S
    @JohnnyWalker123


    In Gentile-run “old” America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them “boy.”
     
    Like lynching, it was White adult men who got the brunt of it simply due to numbers, being called 'boy' more than anyone. While I certainly don't care for the practice, about fifty years back and before it was not an uncommon thing for any adult male (irregardless of race or ethnicity) to be called 'boy' if they were doing unskilled service type work.

    On some of the old 50's era TV shows such as Perry Mason you can on occasion see a bell hop, typically a fully grown adult White male, being called 'boy' in passing. While no offense was intended per se with this practice, I don't mourn it's passing from the language.

    Like lynching, due to lying through omission, the history of the use of the term 'boy' has effectively been rewritten, and many have a mistaken notion it was only used in regards to Blacks.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Anonymous
    @JohnnyWalker123

    From the second video posted:


    They have a home there!

    How can you call this expulsion? They’re going home!

    Every single civilized country would do the same.

    We’ll turn into a country of immigrants!

    But there are those who are hostile to the state, and therefore they want to turn it into a state of people from all over the world.

    We’ll bring in a million Africans, a half million Filipinos, 2 or 3 million Chinese, and that’s the end of it for Israel.

    - Michael Ben-Ari
     

  6. Well, it’s exactly like the JUICE act of Germany. Ha Ha!

    OTOH, Americans like raw sewage wordsalad as much as any Uniformed Functionary, from FATCA to ENDURING FREEDOM.

    Mr. Walton, who is a Democrat on the San Francisco board of supervisors, is well aware that this behavior can lead to real consequences for Black Americans: They are disproportionately likely to be killed by the police, according to analysis by the news media and academic research.

    No incompetent writer’s dish can be complete without a brazen lie.

    making racially motivated 911 calls without reasonable suspicion of a crime

    The Bonnie Situation was a forward-looking sketch of reality. Don’t dial 911, just dial 357. Then call the Wolf.

    • Replies: @Polemos
    @El Dato

    It's amazing that there really hasn't been any kind of complaint or outcry or criticism about that scene in Pulp Fiction. Here you have a white guy saying it over and over and over to, of all people, Samuel L Jackson, and he has to act submissive and congenial, as the actor he is, during the entire exchange. And even gets hosed down by another white guy.

    Of course, the entire movie is working off all these subtexts about the relationships between whites and blacks and amongst one's own race, and it is Jules who ends up going forward along the path of clarity after awakening to the role the divine plays in all of our lives. After, again, the Wolf helps him along, just as the "city of wolves" helps Butch escape from the boxing match. Butch had Grace, Jules has humility and choice.

  7. @JohnnyWalker123
    In Jewish-run "new" America, Blacks insult White women by calling them "Karen."

    In Gentile-run "old" America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them "boy."

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that "boy" was out of style.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwJ45NoWys

    Whites and Blacks struggling for "alpha male" dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they'd react.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @bomag, @anon, @S, @Anonymous

    Good. Keep it that way.

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/sudanese-face-expulsion-minister-declares-israel-belongs-white-man/11394

    Sudanese face expulsion; minister declares Israel “belongs to white man”

    https://africasacountry.com/2012/09/the-white-man-comment

    On the ‘white man’ comment by Israel’s Interior Minister, Eli Yishai. (He implied that Israel was a white country in a debate about immigration.)

  8. Anon[917] • Disclaimer says:

    Since these sorts of laws cannot on their face discriminate, they have a tendency to backfire. All those domestic violence laws, with zero tolerance and must-file provisions? Who’d a thunk that they would end up putting women in jail for doing things that chicks have always thought they have a right to do, slaps, chucking stuff at their man. Cops have checklists now, “Sir, is that a scratch on your face? Is that a piece of broken tableware in the corner?” Woman: “I’s the one who called you, why you arresting me?”

    Steve’s television channel disputes may put a ton of black men and women in jail.

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @Anon


    Since these sorts of laws cannot on their face discriminate, they have a tendency to backfire.
     
    Except for hate crimes laws, which somehow never, never, ever manage to get used against blacks.
  9. > From the New York Times news pages

    NEWS needs an acronym much more urgently than does Karen.

    Not Entirely Worthy of Scrutiny
    Not Enabled to Withstand Sarcasm
    ‘Nother Exceedingly Worthless Story

    Alternatively, “From the New York Times WHY pages”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @ic1000

    The Who/What/When/Where/Why of deep history have been condensed into the 1 true W for best holy incantation.

    "WOKEMON POCACHU, I CHOOSE YOU"

  10. Shamann Walton = Man shat on lawn. [No need to call 911.]

    • LOL: El Dato, Escher
  11. Black Americans: They are disproportionately likely to be killed by the police, according to analysis by the news media and academic research.

    “News media and academic research ‘n stuff.”

    All of which just happen to compare incidents to raw population data, and not once to levels of criminality. Because you are racist, that’s why.

  12. “If you see something, say something.”
    -US Department of Homeland Security

    • Replies: @Adam Smith
    @Flip

    https://act.campaign.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2017/01/ACT-RHT-Banner.png

    - Her Majesty's "government".

  13. I suspect that the War on Karens is simply a part of the greater World War Hair, as described by Steve Sailer. Women of not-so-good Hair resent Women of Good Hair. And the war rages on.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @BB753

    If only that's all it were.

    , @Matt Buckalew
    @BB753

    No that’s just Steve’s misogynistic spin likely born of his own bastardy and abandonment as a child. Also a little resentment because Steve probably sees himself as a border line chad whose geekiness kept him from fucking like a tall ex-jock should have fucked. Also Steve kind of worships status so he thinks -hey if I was a chick I’d fuck any dude with status who looked twice at me so that must be how women feel.

  14. Great to see the NYT has a sense of humour.

    Must be especially hilarious for the family of Nicole Brown.

    • Agree: ic1000
  15. I’m working on a bill to address this. The Need Information Germane Gathered to Ensure Reliability act.

    • Thanks: Alden
  16. @Anonymous
    Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies!

    No 911 for you!

    https://youtu.be/Rzrl2_oY0IY

    Replies: @TelfoedJohn, @uman

    Best comment from that video:

    This would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions of the Black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature make them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their dedication to exceptional civic values, stable traditional families, parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture and their unflagging pride in maintaining exemplary clean, neat and orderly homes. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Property values are boosted and energized by the entry of African Americans into an area thanks to the caring and sincere respect they show for these communities, their absolute dedication to lives of law abiding peaceful neighborliness, and the examples of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self improvement by hard work and a self-reliant, can-do culture of integrity and honor. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @TelfoedJohn

    The [b]lack response to the above comment: You're welcome.

  17. I’m sorry, but the Karens are a royal pain in the rear. It isn’t that they want to makes things right and perfect, they want everyone to bend to their current whim they picked up from watching the likes of The View. These gals want to be leaders despite having the ultimate herd mindset. They despise actual independent thinking women. So in kind, I don’t like them with the exception of my sister.

    The brownies going after them is kinda funny to me due to their pet like love for all brown humans. All this “Caren” thing will do is cause them double down while blaming white men. Sorry but its what the TV tells them to do. If you men want to still save them, good luck.

    • Agree: Dumbo
    • Replies: @Alden
    @Old and Grumpy

    The Karens don’t despise and hate actual independent thinking women as much as The MEN OF UNZ do.

    Replies: @Mario Partisan

    , @Fluesterwitz
    @Old and Grumpy

    While there certainly are woman who behave in the defined Karen manner this does not mean that all woman described as Karens fit the type. Considering how the the Karen trope is used politically, I presume most don't. If it is an example of divide and rule, it appears to work.

  18. @BB753
    I suspect that the War on Karens is simply a part of the greater World War Hair, as described by Steve Sailer. Women of not-so-good Hair resent Women of Good Hair. And the war rages on.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Matt Buckalew

    If only that’s all it were.

  19. @Anonymous
    Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies!

    No 911 for you!

    https://youtu.be/Rzrl2_oY0IY

    Replies: @TelfoedJohn, @uman

    Father and daughter are Mexican.

  20. What happened to Becky? I guess being short for Rebecca, it just wasn’t White Gentile enough. Because God knows that Jewish women are never mouthy, bossy, or entitled.

    I wonder if White women will learn anything from their inevitable fall from grace? Will many become angry at being used to destroy the country in exchange for a few AA jobs and a temporary place near the front of the rainbow coalition? Unfortunately, I’m not holding my breath.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @OilcanFloyd

    The Beckys are Epstein bait, so not Karen.

    , @MBlanc46
    @OilcanFloyd

    They’ll learn nothing. Their fall from grace is something that they’ll blame on white men.

  21. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    What are you talking about? Shamann Walton is black. If bills like this demonstrate anything, it’s that most blacks dislike white women.

    Also if every man on the SF board voted for this bill, what would that mean to most white women? That blacks AND homosexuals don’t like them.

  22. What would you call the mother of the toddler on whose neck Isaiah Jackson kneeled? She defends him.

    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    @Jane Plain

    A coalburner who still has yet to pay the toll.

    Unfortunate that her son already got taxed, however.

    , @Whiskey
    @Jane Plain

    Duh. She's sleeping with him. White women in a nutshell. Probably despises the boys father for being White and beta.

    White women are not gonna change. They made during the Obama years the decision to throw in with Blacks and swap out their White men for a black one.

    White women know they are prettier than black ones so they will always go with black men who are chick crack. Low natural iq, impulsive, violent, physical, impulsive, extraverted.

    They will be happy to trade Karen for an opportunity to be a Kardashian.

  23. The stories showed up in Shamann Walton’s social media feeds with alarming regularity: An eight-year-old selling water to raise money to go to Disneyland. A family barbecuing food on a charcoal grill near Lake Merritt. A man bird watching in Central Park.

    She forget to mention….an 80-something year old woman casually walking down the street. A teenage boy dancing on a street corner. An 18-year-old college freshman going for a jog. A young child at his (I guess) babysitters house. And thousands upon thousands of merchants just doing their part to sell groceries and other goods in the “urban” community.

    Oh wait – those victims, and countless others, were all white. So I guess they don’t count. Or maybe we can come up with a law to protect them. We could call it the Nice Innocent Guys Get Earned Retribution Act. The acronym for it may be a little dicey, but racial slurs are no big deal these days, right?

    But aside from that, I think it’s hysterical that they’re trying to use the name Karen as some kind of slur or put down. Virtually all of the Karen’s I’ve known have been nice, intelligent, and classy beyond measure. If you say to me that someone is a “Karen” and think it’s a put down I’m going to think more of the Karen and less of you. Many terms and phrases reveal more about the person using them than about the person or thing they are being used to describe. “Karen” is one of them.

    • Agree: BenKenobi
    • Replies: @Not My Economy
    @Wilkey


    Many terms and phrases reveal more about the person using them than about the person or thing they are being used to describe. “Karen” is one of them.

     

    "This says a lot more about you than it does about me!" he retorted smugly, immediately before the bullet entered the back of his skull and his body was kicked into the ditch he had been forced to dig.
  24. What about legislation to penalize people in the hood who call 911 because the Baby Mama won’t change the channel on the TV.

  25. @Anon
    Since these sorts of laws cannot on their face discriminate, they have a tendency to backfire. All those domestic violence laws, with zero tolerance and must-file provisions? Who'd a thunk that they would end up putting women in jail for doing things that chicks have always thought they have a right to do, slaps, chucking stuff at their man. Cops have checklists now, "Sir, is that a scratch on your face? Is that a piece of broken tableware in the corner?" Woman: "I's the one who called you, why you arresting me?"

    Steve's television channel disputes may put a ton of black men and women in jail.

    Replies: @Wilkey

    Since these sorts of laws cannot on their face discriminate, they have a tendency to backfire.

    Except for hate crimes laws, which somehow never, never, ever manage to get used against blacks.

    • Agree: artichoke
  26. Time for our own White police?

    For White areas?

    With identifiable and defensible borders?

    White countries?

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    @Gordo

    Long past time.

  27. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    Some of them are truly shocked to discover Black and Latino women don’t really like them. And while men of Color want to tap that White body, they mostly don’t like them as people either.

    I notice it’s often the pretty White women who are gobsmacked the most. They’ve always been treated as goddesses. But plain White women are often much more realistic. They don’t always get the special breaks. So give them the compassion.

    • Replies: @Jesse
    @RichardTaylor

    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them? The men with any realistic racial consciousness are so awful that they somehow make the alternative look good. The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.

    Hate to break it to ya, but showing up and sniping won't get you anywhere, especially since you're powerless and other Whites loathe you. At some point you're actually going to have to make alliances. Granted, breaking the habits of a century might be hard, but don't you get tired of epic losing?

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Mario Partisan

    , @dfordoom
    @RichardTaylor


    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.
     
    That would be a rational move on their part.

    It's increasingly obvious that actual biological white women are going to be purged from the Coalition of the Fringes. Interestingly, white lesbians (the ones who are biological women and want to have sex with biological women) are going to be purged as well. And they're going to be purged from the LGBTetc coalition.

    Where will these women go? They won't go to the alt-right. Women are (understandably) repulsed by the alt-right. In fact the Right as a whole has little appeal to women (which is also understandable given that the only things the mainstream Right cares about are greed and war).

    Will white women become a kind of independent floating political bloc? That might be the most rational move of all for them.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    , @Alden
    @RichardTaylor

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

    Your and the rest of the women haters problem is that you’re so ugly and creepy you can’t get laid and that makes you bitter.

    It’s pretty obvious from reading the comments why you hate White women so much.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor

  28. CAREN Act of July 2020…. formerly known as the “How Dare You Not Eat Out in China Town Act of February 2020” ….

  29. There’s a whole “we don’t want to fight so let’s renegotiate the terms-of-the-peace a bit more in your favor” kind of vibe coming from the corporate set … here and on the credit thing and the Chevron thing, and etc etc.
    Which tells me this: if you are willing to fight – you’d better organize, and get each other’s back. It means refusing to patronize these companies and cities – and mutually supporting one another while starving the Maoists out while they inevitably eat each other.
    I get the sense though that no one really wants to do this. Many would just as well either a) skip ahead to hot-war, or b) let someone else be the one to stick their neck out. Well – if we can’t count on mutual solidarity now there’s not much hoping for a hot-war and if it’s all “you go ahead and volunteer your neck first I’ll be right behind you”, not hard to see why the organized other side doesn’t see much of a threat to it’s increasing demands for appeasement.
    We seem to face our Attila.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    @Simplepseudonymichandle


    It means refusing to patronize these companies
     
    In a world in which the entire corporate sector is Woke and SJW that's a difficult option.
  30. @Wilkey

    The stories showed up in Shamann Walton’s social media feeds with alarming regularity: An eight-year-old selling water to raise money to go to Disneyland. A family barbecuing food on a charcoal grill near Lake Merritt. A man bird watching in Central Park.
     
    She forget to mention....an 80-something year old woman casually walking down the street. A teenage boy dancing on a street corner. An 18-year-old college freshman going for a jog. A young child at his (I guess) babysitters house. And thousands upon thousands of merchants just doing their part to sell groceries and other goods in the “urban” community.

    Oh wait - those victims, and countless others, were all white. So I guess they don’t count. Or maybe we can come up with a law to protect them. We could call it the Nice Innocent Guys Get Earned Retribution Act. The acronym for it may be a little dicey, but racial slurs are no big deal these days, right?

    But aside from that, I think it’s hysterical that they’re trying to use the name Karen as some kind of slur or put down. Virtually all of the Karen’s I’ve known have been nice, intelligent, and classy beyond measure. If you say to me that someone is a “Karen” and think it’s a put down I’m going to think more of the Karen and less of you. Many terms and phrases reveal more about the person using them than about the person or thing they are being used to describe. “Karen” is one of them.

    Replies: @Not My Economy

    Many terms and phrases reveal more about the person using them than about the person or thing they are being used to describe. “Karen” is one of them.

    “This says a lot more about you than it does about me!” he retorted smugly, immediately before the bullet entered the back of his skull and his body was kicked into the ditch he had been forced to dig.

  31. @El Dato
    Well, it's exactly like the JUICE act of Germany. Ha Ha!

    OTOH, Americans like raw sewage wordsalad as much as any Uniformed Functionary, from FATCA to ENDURING FREEDOM.


    Mr. Walton, who is a Democrat on the San Francisco board of supervisors, is well aware that this behavior can lead to real consequences for Black Americans: They are disproportionately likely to be killed by the police, according to analysis by the news media and academic research.
     
    No incompetent writer's dish can be complete without a brazen lie.

    making racially motivated 911 calls without reasonable suspicion of a crime
     
    The Bonnie Situation was a forward-looking sketch of reality. Don't dial 911, just dial 357. Then call the Wolf.

    Replies: @Polemos

    It’s amazing that there really hasn’t been any kind of complaint or outcry or criticism about that scene in Pulp Fiction. Here you have a white guy saying it over and over and over to, of all people, Samuel L Jackson, and he has to act submissive and congenial, as the actor he is, during the entire exchange. And even gets hosed down by another white guy.

    Of course, the entire movie is working off all these subtexts about the relationships between whites and blacks and amongst one’s own race, and it is Jules who ends up going forward along the path of clarity after awakening to the role the divine plays in all of our lives. After, again, the Wolf helps him along, just as the “city of wolves” helps Butch escape from the boxing match. Butch had Grace, Jules has humility and choice.

  32. @JohnnyWalker123
    In Jewish-run "new" America, Blacks insult White women by calling them "Karen."

    In Gentile-run "old" America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them "boy."

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that "boy" was out of style.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwJ45NoWys

    Whites and Blacks struggling for "alpha male" dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they'd react.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @bomag, @anon, @S, @Anonymous

    Thanks for the video.

    Good to know there is some sanity in the world.

  33. @JohnnyWalker123
    In Jewish-run "new" America, Blacks insult White women by calling them "Karen."

    In Gentile-run "old" America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them "boy."

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that "boy" was out of style.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwJ45NoWys

    Whites and Blacks struggling for "alpha male" dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they'd react.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @bomag, @anon, @S, @Anonymous

    Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima are nicer names to generically call Black persons.

  34. a white woman who embodies “Can-I-speak-to-the-manager?” energy

    This guy is clearly a Karen:

    • Thanks: Lot
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    @Percy Gryce

    I think he would be a Garyn.

  35. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    Like a typical leftist, you are doing the exact thing you claim to be against: creating division.

    People who talk like this were never on our side anyway. It’s called concern trolling. That’s why you need 45,000 different screen names, to try and divide the red-pill movement among the goyim.

    Just go away. You aren’t part of our thing. You are a nuisance. You will not be missed and you contribute nothing except drama and whining. BYE

    • Agree: BenKenobi
    • Replies: @Jesse
    @Anon

    Aw, I'm sowwy. I didn't realize this was a safe space for y'all to have a circle jerk. I assumed that, at some point, you'd want something real to happen.

    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant. It's not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have dine for you. It's that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.

    And that's why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this. And everyone here seems contend to vent all their frustrations, and somehow be convinced they're achieving something.

    Replies: @dfordoom, @Alden

  36. @Flip
    "If you see something, say something."
    -US Department of Homeland Security

    Replies: @Adam Smith

    – Her Majesty’s “government”.

  37. Anonymous[504] • Disclaimer says:

    Lori Lightfoot, or someone chained in the basement to “manage” Herzzonner’s PR bully-pulpit avatar in cyberspace — if you’re into such dystopian sci-fi/Max Headroom spoof exaggerations of reality — did call the White House Press Sec “Karen” but it didn’t land. As the press gal is clearly Becky out of proverbial central casting.

    Get your derogatory epithets straight, Lightfoot…

  38. OT: For those who haven’t seen it, this is worth watching.

  39. Anonymous[504] • Disclaimer says:
    @ic1000
    > From the New York Times news pages

    NEWS needs an acronym much more urgently than does Karen.

    Not Entirely Worthy of Scrutiny
    Not Enabled to Withstand Sarcasm
    ‘Nother Exceedingly Worthless Story

    Alternatively, “From the New York Times WHY pages”

    Replies: @Anonymous

    The Who/What/When/Where/Why of deep history have been condensed into the 1 true W for best holy incantation.

    “WOKEMON POCACHU, I CHOOSE YOU”

  40. @Percy Gryce

    a white woman who embodies “Can-I-speak-to-the-manager?” energy

     

    This guy is clearly a Karen:


    https://youtu.be/jOkdR7on6Ok

    Replies: @OilcanFloyd

    I think he would be a Garyn.

  41. S says:
    @JohnnyWalker123
    In Jewish-run "new" America, Blacks insult White women by calling them "Karen."

    In Gentile-run "old" America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them "boy."

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that "boy" was out of style.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwJ45NoWys

    Whites and Blacks struggling for "alpha male" dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they'd react.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @bomag, @anon, @S, @Anonymous

    In Gentile-run “old” America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them “boy.”

    Like lynching, it was White adult men who got the brunt of it simply due to numbers, being called ‘boy’ more than anyone. While I certainly don’t care for the practice, about fifty years back and before it was not an uncommon thing for any adult male (irregardless of race or ethnicity) to be called ‘boy’ if they were doing unskilled service type work.

    On some of the old 50’s era TV shows such as Perry Mason you can on occasion see a bell hop, typically a fully grown adult White male, being called ‘boy’ in passing. While no offense was intended per se with this practice, I don’t mourn it’s passing from the language.

    Like lynching, due to lying through omission, the history of the use of the term ‘boy’ has effectively been rewritten, and many have a mistaken notion it was only used in regards to Blacks.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @S

    The term persists in the name "busboy" which is still used. Because of child labor laws, menial jobs that were once done by children or young teens (e.g. bellboy, shoe shine boy) are now done by full grown adults but the "boy" description still sometimes attaches. In other cases ("ball boy") the job is still done by children (though often nowadays by girls).

    Naturally, being the lowest skilled, the grown men who replaced children in these menial jobs were often black but the job title was still "boy" - there was no racial angle. In the old days, IQ was sometimes express as mental age, so it's not surprising that a job once done by a white 12 year old would become one that a black 16+ year old was capable of in the age of child labor laws.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

  42. If you see something, say something. Unless …

  43. They are disproportionately likely to be killed by the police, according to analysis by the news media and academic research.

    The Big Lie doing its job, apparently…

  44. my contribution to the name game…. TestosteRoNeesha/TestosteRoNavius

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
  45. When did they switch from Becky to Karen?

  46. @OilcanFloyd
    What happened to Becky? I guess being short for Rebecca, it just wasn't White Gentile enough. Because God knows that Jewish women are never mouthy, bossy, or entitled.

    I wonder if White women will learn anything from their inevitable fall from grace? Will many become angry at being used to destroy the country in exchange for a few AA jobs and a temporary place near the front of the rainbow coalition? Unfortunately, I'm not holding my breath.

    Replies: @El Dato, @MBlanc46

    The Beckys are Epstein bait, so not Karen.

  47. The United States Senate approved the nineteenth amendment to the Constitution, granting to women the right to vote. I have read several of the arguments for and against. One of the common predictions of those in favor was that women would leaven the political world with their idealism, their good sense, their care for the weak and vulnerable, and their aversion to hatred and violence. That was just Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in pink ribbons. Experience has shown otherwise. No one will dare to say, “Women are now involved in politics more than ever before, and therefore we have become less polarized, less angry, more determined to accomplish difficult projects for the common good regardless of which party benefits, more patriotic, and more devoted to our intellectual and artistic heritage.”

    — Anthony Esolen

    http://www.theagonist.org/essays/2019/12/31/essays-esolen.html

    At least Karen isn’t married, in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. She’s much happier this way, as are we all.

  48. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:

    An eight-year-old selling water to raise money to go to Disneyland.

    I seem to recall that the eight-year-old in this case wasn’t selling her water quietly and unobtrusively, but rather, was hawking her wares in the manner of a miniature fishwife (i.e. very loudly).

    If so, it’s no wonder the police were called. Isn’t there a law on the books in San Francisco that says the homeless denizens of the city have the right to relieve themselves on the sidewalk in peace?

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Anonymous

    Every once in a while I’ve seen 7-11 year old black kids sometimes in pairs, sometimes alone going into restaurants, in supermarket parking lots, busy corners selling candy bars allegedly for their school, even at night. They’re not selling them for school.

    They’re just exploited children working for some piece of scum who bought the school candy and knows people will feel sorry for the kids and give them money.

    That’s what’s 8 year old black peddlers are. In a few years she might be working as a street prostitute.

  49. Not calling the police can have dire consequences. Some one here posted a comment about Shatavia Wells. Look it up and shake your head in disbelief. Short summary, don’t call the police, they will escalate the situation. Try to talk to the trouble makers. End result RIP Ms. Wells.

  50. @S
    @JohnnyWalker123


    In Gentile-run “old” America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them “boy.”
     
    Like lynching, it was White adult men who got the brunt of it simply due to numbers, being called 'boy' more than anyone. While I certainly don't care for the practice, about fifty years back and before it was not an uncommon thing for any adult male (irregardless of race or ethnicity) to be called 'boy' if they were doing unskilled service type work.

    On some of the old 50's era TV shows such as Perry Mason you can on occasion see a bell hop, typically a fully grown adult White male, being called 'boy' in passing. While no offense was intended per se with this practice, I don't mourn it's passing from the language.

    Like lynching, due to lying through omission, the history of the use of the term 'boy' has effectively been rewritten, and many have a mistaken notion it was only used in regards to Blacks.

    Replies: @Jack D

    The term persists in the name “busboy” which is still used. Because of child labor laws, menial jobs that were once done by children or young teens (e.g. bellboy, shoe shine boy) are now done by full grown adults but the “boy” description still sometimes attaches. In other cases (“ball boy”) the job is still done by children (though often nowadays by girls).

    Naturally, being the lowest skilled, the grown men who replaced children in these menial jobs were often black but the job title was still “boy” – there was no racial angle. In the old days, IQ was sometimes express as mental age, so it’s not surprising that a job once done by a white 12 year old would become one that a black 16+ year old was capable of in the age of child labor laws.

    • Thanks: Joseph Doaks
    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Jack D

    In a film crew there are two kinds of best boy: best boy electric and best boy grip. They are assistants to their department heads, the gaffer (in charge of electricals) and the key grip (lighting and rigging), respectively. In short, the best boy acts as the foreman for his department.

  51. @Jane Plain
    What would you call the mother of the toddler on whose neck Isaiah Jackson kneeled? She defends him.

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Whiskey

    A coalburner who still has yet to pay the toll.

    Unfortunate that her son already got taxed, however.

  52. I still prefer a badly contrived acronym to those laws that aim for the heartstrings by being named after some abused or murdered woman or child — Bobby’s Law, Brandi’s Law, Katie’s Law or whatever

  53. @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    Some of them are truly shocked to discover Black and Latino women don't really like them. And while men of Color want to tap that White body, they mostly don't like them as people either.


    I notice it's often the pretty White women who are gobsmacked the most. They've always been treated as goddesses. But plain White women are often much more realistic. They don't always get the special breaks. So give them the compassion.

    Replies: @Jesse, @dfordoom, @Alden

    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them? The men with any realistic racial consciousness are so awful that they somehow make the alternative look good. The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.

    Hate to break it to ya, but showing up and sniping won’t get you anywhere, especially since you’re powerless and other Whites loathe you. At some point you’re actually going to have to make alliances. Granted, breaking the habits of a century might be hard, but don’t you get tired of epic losing?

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse


    The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.
     
    If a White man or woman is just making calculations ONLY about their own life and couldn't care less about the future of their descendants, then there's no reaching them anyway.

    Replies: @Jesse

    , @Mario Partisan
    @Jesse

    I suspect I understand your purpose here, but I am going to assume that you are here in good faith, and respond to you. I am going to assume you are female, and whether I am right or wrong, I am right.

    So, assuming your good faith, it seems that your purpose is to make the “WN” men in the UR commentariat aware that their honest talk, i.e. “misogyny” is hurting the conservative movement, by alienating white females.


    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them?
     
    Your comments echo your sister “Alden.”

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

     

    The problem as I see it with your comments is that it assumes that the path to gaining the alliance of white women is to “respect” them. Boy, is that something I had to unlearn the hard way; and I say that on a purely personal level, as I don’t consider myself a WN politically.

    The US and European nations have reached a point at which intra-white gender relations are at an all-time low, not after a period of patriarchal ascendancy, but decades after the triumph of feminism, the entry of women into the workforce and college. As a whole, when white women demanded “liberation” white men got on their knees and said “yes, Karen, my princess.”

    Your sister Karen smelled weakness in white men for acquiescing to her demands, and decided to leave her husband and children for a joy ride on the Quantavius cock carousel.

    In short, white men are paying for their respect and kindness, not for their sexism. Haven’t you heard: nice guys finish last.

    And, to an extent, this is very understandable once one understands how the dynamics of the female gestation period, the extreme investment humans (women and men) must place in raising their young and the forces of evolution have worked together to shape the female psyche.

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft, brains became more important than brawn, the risks associated with child birth and rearing were largely removed, and the incentive for a woman to forgo a life of carefree fornication for a stable but boring life with a provider evaporated.

    It is interesting that second wave feminism initially appeared on the scene well into the post-war technological boom and following the humiliation that young American men received in Indo-china. It is almost like a sudden, society-wide female shit test hit the men of America. “Equality Now” demanded the female cerebellums; “Put me in my place” screamed the female limbic systems. We listened, respected your words, and thus, failed the shit test.

    Having failed the initial shit test, a series of never ending tests descended upon us, to the point where universities were enacting “affirmative consent” policies that turn an act of passion into a series of legal documents to be signed. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the men who need to hear that BS, the Quantavii, aren’t going to care one bit, while the only men who will give it the time of day don’t need it. It only serves to reduce the self confidence of mild mannered white and Asian dudes, further reducing their perceived sexual market value. What a sadistic con!

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW. It’s almost like someone wants us dead.

    The fact is, there are two types of men for every woman: men who are worthy of their wombs and men who are not. A man who you deem worthy of your womb can say and do anything to you and you will enjoy it; a man who is not deemed worthy can’t do or say anything right.

    Why would white women team up with WN (or even just white) men, you ask. I don’t know. But what I can say with confidence is that your decision not to do so has nothing to do with the beliefs of those men or their manner of expressing those beliefs. You simply smell the consensus in the society at large, understand the nature of inter-racial power dynamics, and have decided that white men are not worthy of your womb. Their “epic losing” has nothing to do with them not respecting you. You don’t respect them because of their epic losing, and that started when their boomer dads bowed to their boomer mothers.

    So, what is your purpose here? Your purpose is to gleefully pile on and to engage in an emotionally incontinent power play over men you consider out of your league. Jesse, you are a Karen. Congrats!

    Replies: @Jesse, @anon, @Sam Malone

  54. @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    Some of them are truly shocked to discover Black and Latino women don't really like them. And while men of Color want to tap that White body, they mostly don't like them as people either.


    I notice it's often the pretty White women who are gobsmacked the most. They've always been treated as goddesses. But plain White women are often much more realistic. They don't always get the special breaks. So give them the compassion.

    Replies: @Jesse, @dfordoom, @Alden

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    That would be a rational move on their part.

    It’s increasingly obvious that actual biological white women are going to be purged from the Coalition of the Fringes. Interestingly, white lesbians (the ones who are biological women and want to have sex with biological women) are going to be purged as well. And they’re going to be purged from the LGBTetc coalition.

    Where will these women go? They won’t go to the alt-right. Women are (understandably) repulsed by the alt-right. In fact the Right as a whole has little appeal to women (which is also understandable given that the only things the mainstream Right cares about are greed and war).

    Will white women become a kind of independent floating political bloc? That might be the most rational move of all for them.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @dfordoom

    You forgot to mention abortion. The majority of American women will gravitate towards the political entity that supports their right to choose. Women want ownership of their reproductive system. Imagine that.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  55. @Simplepseudonymichandle
    There's a whole "we don't want to fight so let's renegotiate the terms-of-the-peace a bit more in your favor" kind of vibe coming from the corporate set ... here and on the credit thing and the Chevron thing, and etc etc.
    Which tells me this: if you are willing to fight - you'd better organize, and get each other's back. It means refusing to patronize these companies and cities - and mutually supporting one another while starving the Maoists out while they inevitably eat each other.
    I get the sense though that no one really wants to do this. Many would just as well either a) skip ahead to hot-war, or b) let someone else be the one to stick their neck out. Well - if we can't count on mutual solidarity now there's not much hoping for a hot-war and if it's all "you go ahead and volunteer your neck first I'll be right behind you", not hard to see why the organized other side doesn't see much of a threat to it's increasing demands for appeasement.
    We seem to face our Attila.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    It means refusing to patronize these companies

    In a world in which the entire corporate sector is Woke and SJW that’s a difficult option.

  56. @Anon
    @Jesse

    Like a typical leftist, you are doing the exact thing you claim to be against: creating division.

    People who talk like this were never on our side anyway. It's called concern trolling. That's why you need 45,000 different screen names, to try and divide the red-pill movement among the goyim.

    Just go away. You aren't part of our thing. You are a nuisance. You will not be missed and you contribute nothing except drama and whining. BYE

    Replies: @Jesse

    Aw, I’m sowwy. I didn’t realize this was a safe space for y’all to have a circle jerk. I assumed that, at some point, you’d want something real to happen.

    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant. It’s not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have dine for you. It’s that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.

    And that’s why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this. And everyone here seems contend to vent all their frustrations, and somehow be convinced they’re achieving something.

    • Troll: Ben tillman
    • Replies: @dfordoom
    @Jesse


    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant.

     

    Sadly you're correct. A political movement that actively sets out to make enemies of the entire female sex is not going to get very far.

    It’s not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have done for you. It’s that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.
     
    Sadly, again you're basically correct.

    And that’s why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this.
     
    Even more sadly, that may well be the case. No-one here seems to realise that normal people don't really want to be associated with foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-haters, Hitler fanboys, hardcore white supremacists, knuckle-dragging racists, virulent woman-haters and nutty conspiracy theorists.

    It's almost as if this site exists in order to ensure that the alt-right and white nationalism remain marginalised and despised. No political movement in history has worked so tirelessly to destroy itself. And the crazies here think they're being cool and edgy. Tragic. The alt-right and white nationalism are just not serious political movements.

    And it is tragic because there are some intelligent, perceptive, sane, reasonable people here. But the crazies suck up all the oxygen.
    , @Alden
    @Jesse

    I believe one of their hands is not waving but busy lower down.

  57. @Rob McX
    How about Kitty Genovese Act?

    Replies: @David In TN

    “How about Kitty Genovese Act?

    Instead of the name “Karen,” they should use the name “Channon.”

    One wonders if the NY Times cohort have an opinion on what happened to the real-life young woman named Channon.

    • Agree: ic1000
  58. @Jane Plain
    What would you call the mother of the toddler on whose neck Isaiah Jackson kneeled? She defends him.

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Whiskey

    Duh. She’s sleeping with him. White women in a nutshell. Probably despises the boys father for being White and beta.

    White women are not gonna change. They made during the Obama years the decision to throw in with Blacks and swap out their White men for a black one.

    White women know they are prettier than black ones so they will always go with black men who are chick crack. Low natural iq, impulsive, violent, physical, impulsive, extraverted.

    They will be happy to trade Karen for an opportunity to be a Kardashian.

  59. An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.

    She has gotten quite a bit of political hay over claiming to have been racially profiled.

    Here is what happened.

    She and her mother were out campaigning together. They inadvertently parked in front of a drug house. One of the neighbors called the cops, for the 23rd time. The cops came, and she felt humiliated because the cops asked for some proof she was campaigning. They wanted to see her leaflets.

    She whined and complained, and it even made the national news.

    It is still Holy Writ in Madison that she was racially profiled, even though the guy who called the cops insists he had no idea whose car it was, just that SOME car was parked in front of the drug house.

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Paleo Liberal

    Right, because you don't want people calling the cops unnecessarily on what they think is suspicious activity. If you see a black guy breaking into a house, how do you know that it's not his OWN house and that he's not a Harvard professor? Unless you know for sure, keep your mouth shut, whitey.

    , @anon
    @Paleo Liberal

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    I hope you have offered strong and public support for her bill. Anything less would be racist, surely,

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Paleo Liberal


    An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.
     
    Does she represent Pinckney Street? Is she trying to get that name, and the city's, changed?

    And why was MLK's name put on the shortest thing in the isthmus?

    On which police HQ sits!

    But the address of which is on the other side at Carroll St-- after yet another slaveowner! (Wouldn't you rather have your mail sent to a boulevard?) The other two streets are named for James Wilson, who was responsible for the Three-Fifths Scam Compromise, and James Doty, the city's founder with a suspiciously Mayflower surname-- born in Salem, no less.

    Was she involved in this?

    What's in a Madison building's name? Not much if the name's Obama


    Origins of Madison Street Names

  60. S says:

    there was no racial angle.

    In regards to the term ‘boy’, exactly.

    That is an interesting angle about the child labor laws much reducing the use of actual boys for labor, but the term persisting even though adults were now often doing the work instead.

    Here’s another where ‘boy’ and ‘girl’ are still used in film work terminology, ie ‘best boy’, and ‘best girl’, in reference to adult assistants to department heads.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_boy

  61. @Paleo Liberal
    An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.

    She has gotten quite a bit of political hay over claiming to have been racially profiled.

    Here is what happened.

    She and her mother were out campaigning together. They inadvertently parked in front of a drug house. One of the neighbors called the cops, for the 23rd time. The cops came, and she felt humiliated because the cops asked for some proof she was campaigning. They wanted to see her leaflets.

    She whined and complained, and it even made the national news.

    It is still Holy Writ in Madison that she was racially profiled, even though the guy who called the cops insists he had no idea whose car it was, just that SOME car was parked in front of the drug house.

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    Replies: @Jack D, @anon, @Reg Cæsar

    Right, because you don’t want people calling the cops unnecessarily on what they think is suspicious activity. If you see a black guy breaking into a house, how do you know that it’s not his OWN house and that he’s not a Harvard professor? Unless you know for sure, keep your mouth shut, whitey.

  62. America has tremendous social contention and polarization right now.

    But no one seems to be thinking “out of the box” on ways to address the core concerns of all stakeholders in the American project, to “bring us together” and to heal.

    Black women like Evan Nicole Brown are angry. Particularly when she thinks about black men and white women and cops. Why should white women be allow to call the cops on black men? … like they own them! That’s wrong! Black men belong to Black women. Evan is able to grow her hair long enough for breast length braids. But are black men noticing? Not enough! And that’s a problem. Actually that’s a crime! Evan Nicole is the one who should be calling the cops–not some flat assed Karen.

    We can, we must, fix this.

    #1 — Black women should be able to call the police on any black man they see with a white woman. That should be a felony and those are the black men the cops need to arrest.
    #2 — Black women should be able to call the police on any unmarried black man they fancy, who doesn’t show any sexual interest in them. This would only be a misdemeanor, and could be dealt with a ticket and a firm warning–if the black man apologizes. If the black man agrees to take the woman out, the ticket and fine would be waived.

    Every month or two any Black woman who is tired of the single life, could sign up to enter her local community’s Black marriage pool. The male side of the pool would consist of all black men who had been arrested for being seen with a white woman, or who had volunteered, or who turned say 32, without marrying a proud Black woman.

    These Black men and women would then compete in a mutual, dating and rating, matching TV show (like the Bachelor franchise). Every week men and women rating each other and pairing off for dates, seeing who they click with. Working toward black men proposing to Proud Black Women to be their wives. We’d call it Black Live Mating!

    In parallel, we’d have a program of mentoring black HS graduate boys in the construction trades. The illegals–“dreamers” included–would be sent home. All victim studies programs at colleges and universities would be closed, so if a black HS graduate didn’t want to study something real or useful, this would a route forward. These newly minted black construction workers would be building new homes, schools, business space in new all black communities. Funding provided–in cash or materials–by BLM supporting big business.

    As Black Lives Mating couples match up–proposals made and accepted–the couple would immediately just “get it on” for the cameras. This would keep up male interest and make the show authentically black. The viewing audience would rate the couples, including on this effort, and the winning couple would be given a large, luxurious home in the new black neighborhood–reparations! The runners up, something less spacious/luxurious … on down to the lowest rated matched couple in a modest bungalow or apartment. The couples would be pack off for their new neighborhood to begin their new lives of wedded Black bliss.

    These new couples could sell naming rights for the spawn of their on-air pro-creative efforts, to BLM supporting corporations. So instead of DeShitavious, these kids would start life with more white friendly names–Chevy, Ford, Coke, Pepsi, Tide, Ivory (ok, maybe not that one), Colt-45, Apple, Amazon, Google … Pity the poor black boy stuck with naming rights from Microsoft … but, hey, his parents would be laughing all the way to the bank.

    Black men who refused to propose, or were rejected, would be sent to enclosed “camps” where they would work out, learn a trade if they lacked job skills and work on their grooming and game. And return to the show six months or a year later. Repeated failures to land a big beautiful black woman, at past the age of say 45? … they’d be sent back to Africa. Black women could re-enter the contest after an interval–say a year. But with repeated failures, the viewing audience could vote them back to Africa as well. This would encourage black women to improve their attitude and size issues, which in turn would improve the matching ratio … and the happiness of the black marriages.

    Too often polarized Americans just harp on problems and yell at each other. But if we think creatively there are real solutions to these so-called “intractable” problems and opportunities to find common ground.

    Black Lives Mating would cut through the political noise and begin to address the “root causes” of black anger–not enough quality black men proposing marriage to Big Beautiful Black women.

    Kayne and Trump should co-host. Let’s make (Black) America great again!

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @AnotherDad


    Black women should be able to call the police on any black man they see with a white woman. That should be a felony and those are the black men the cops need to arrest.
     
    Unless he kills her. The black women on the OJ jury showed they were OK with that.
  63. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    The misogynist women hating MEN OF UNZ will be sure to donate to Shamamm Walton’s next campaign. And the next and the next till he becomes governor or at least Congress critter as soon as that evil Karen Pelosi retires.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    @Alden

    We hate the sin, not the sinners.

  64. @Old and Grumpy
    I'm sorry, but the Karens are a royal pain in the rear. It isn't that they want to makes things right and perfect, they want everyone to bend to their current whim they picked up from watching the likes of The View. These gals want to be leaders despite having the ultimate herd mindset. They despise actual independent thinking women. So in kind, I don't like them with the exception of my sister.

    The brownies going after them is kinda funny to me due to their pet like love for all brown humans. All this "Caren" thing will do is cause them double down while blaming white men. Sorry but its what the TV tells them to do. If you men want to still save them, good luck.

    Replies: @Alden, @Fluesterwitz

    The Karens don’t despise and hate actual independent thinking women as much as The MEN OF UNZ do.

    • Replies: @Mario Partisan
    @Alden

    Let me disabuse you of that idea. As a MAN OF UNZ, I don’t hate “actual independent thinking women” just like I don’t hate unicorns or the tooth fairy.

  65. @Paleo Liberal
    An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.

    She has gotten quite a bit of political hay over claiming to have been racially profiled.

    Here is what happened.

    She and her mother were out campaigning together. They inadvertently parked in front of a drug house. One of the neighbors called the cops, for the 23rd time. The cops came, and she felt humiliated because the cops asked for some proof she was campaigning. They wanted to see her leaflets.

    She whined and complained, and it even made the national news.

    It is still Holy Writ in Madison that she was racially profiled, even though the guy who called the cops insists he had no idea whose car it was, just that SOME car was parked in front of the drug house.

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    Replies: @Jack D, @anon, @Reg Cæsar

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    I hope you have offered strong and public support for her bill. Anything less would be racist, surely,

  66. @Paleo Liberal
    An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.

    She has gotten quite a bit of political hay over claiming to have been racially profiled.

    Here is what happened.

    She and her mother were out campaigning together. They inadvertently parked in front of a drug house. One of the neighbors called the cops, for the 23rd time. The cops came, and she felt humiliated because the cops asked for some proof she was campaigning. They wanted to see her leaflets.

    She whined and complained, and it even made the national news.

    It is still Holy Writ in Madison that she was racially profiled, even though the guy who called the cops insists he had no idea whose car it was, just that SOME car was parked in front of the drug house.

    Her proposed bill would make needlessly calling the cops on a POC a civil fine punishable by $250.

    Replies: @Jack D, @anon, @Reg Cæsar

    An African-American state legislator from Madison proposed a similar bill not too long ago.

    Does she represent Pinckney Street? Is she trying to get that name, and the city’s, changed?

    And why was MLK’s name put on the shortest thing in the isthmus?

    On which police HQ sits!

    But the address of which is on the other side at Carroll St– after yet another slaveowner! (Wouldn’t you rather have your mail sent to a boulevard?) The other two streets are named for James Wilson, who was responsible for the Three-Fifths Scam Compromise, and James Doty, the city’s founder with a suspiciously Mayflower surname– born in Salem, no less.

    Was she involved in this?

    What’s in a Madison building’s name? Not much if the name’s Obama

    Origins of Madison Street Names

  67. what was the clever acronym?

  68. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    It wasn’t racial unity that kept Hillary out, Trump got a smaller share of the white vote than Romney did. Had there been racial unity Trump would have won at least 2/3 of whites and completely blown out Hillary

  69. @TelfoedJohn
    @Anonymous

    Best comment from that video:


    This would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions of the Black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature make them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their dedication to exceptional civic values, stable traditional families, parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture and their unflagging pride in maintaining exemplary clean, neat and orderly homes. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Property values are boosted and energized by the entry of African Americans into an area thanks to the caring and sincere respect they show for these communities, their absolute dedication to lives of law abiding peaceful neighborliness, and the examples of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self improvement by hard work and a self-reliant, can-do culture of integrity and honor. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.
     

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    The [b]lack response to the above comment: You’re welcome.

  70. @dfordoom
    @RichardTaylor


    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.
     
    That would be a rational move on their part.

    It's increasingly obvious that actual biological white women are going to be purged from the Coalition of the Fringes. Interestingly, white lesbians (the ones who are biological women and want to have sex with biological women) are going to be purged as well. And they're going to be purged from the LGBTetc coalition.

    Where will these women go? They won't go to the alt-right. Women are (understandably) repulsed by the alt-right. In fact the Right as a whole has little appeal to women (which is also understandable given that the only things the mainstream Right cares about are greed and war).

    Will white women become a kind of independent floating political bloc? That might be the most rational move of all for them.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    You forgot to mention abortion. The majority of American women will gravitate towards the political entity that supports their right to choose. Women want ownership of their reproductive system. Imagine that.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @SunBakedSuburb


    The majority of American women will gravitate towards the political entity that supports their right to choose.
     
    Like they do every January.




    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EdoronhXkAEAjdJ.jpg

    https://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2020/01/24/6905220f-e414-4ae0-8bfa-8e478de27b02/thumbnail/640x427/0c7705ae2f80c154f9a16ac9ce26f213/gettyimages-1195734661.jpg


    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/01/24/us/politics/24dc-march-sub1/merlin_167724804_b610ecda-c3a5-4e00-bf61-9149d93a13a7-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg

    Women want ownership of their reproductive system...
     
    ...and of the men who have to pay for it. Or at least their wages. Imagine that.

    Women want ownership of their reproductive system.
     
    E pluribus unum? Out of many women, one reproductive system? Why does that sound more like a beehive or an anthill than anything human?

    Consider who is President today, and who is not-- thanks to that "blue wall".

    At March for Life, Trump shows he gets the power of abortion issue

    "The great thing about Donald Trump is that Donald Trump doesn't care about what the establishment thinks." --Marc Thiessen

    Apparently you do.
  71. @Jesse
    @Anon

    Aw, I'm sowwy. I didn't realize this was a safe space for y'all to have a circle jerk. I assumed that, at some point, you'd want something real to happen.

    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant. It's not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have dine for you. It's that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.

    And that's why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this. And everyone here seems contend to vent all their frustrations, and somehow be convinced they're achieving something.

    Replies: @dfordoom, @Alden

    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant.

    Sadly you’re correct. A political movement that actively sets out to make enemies of the entire female sex is not going to get very far.

    It’s not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have done for you. It’s that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.

    Sadly, again you’re basically correct.

    And that’s why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this.

    Even more sadly, that may well be the case. No-one here seems to realise that normal people don’t really want to be associated with foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-haters, Hitler fanboys, hardcore white supremacists, knuckle-dragging racists, virulent woman-haters and nutty conspiracy theorists.

    It’s almost as if this site exists in order to ensure that the alt-right and white nationalism remain marginalised and despised. No political movement in history has worked so tirelessly to destroy itself. And the crazies here think they’re being cool and edgy. Tragic. The alt-right and white nationalism are just not serious political movements.

    And it is tragic because there are some intelligent, perceptive, sane, reasonable people here. But the crazies suck up all the oxygen.

    • LOL: Gabe Ruth
  72. @Anonymous


    An eight-year-old selling water to raise money to go to Disneyland.

     

    I seem to recall that the eight-year-old in this case wasn't selling her water quietly and unobtrusively, but rather, was hawking her wares in the manner of a miniature fishwife (i.e. very loudly).

    If so, it's no wonder the police were called. Isn't there a law on the books in San Francisco that says the homeless denizens of the city have the right to relieve themselves on the sidewalk in peace?

    Replies: @Alden

    Every once in a while I’ve seen 7-11 year old black kids sometimes in pairs, sometimes alone going into restaurants, in supermarket parking lots, busy corners selling candy bars allegedly for their school, even at night. They’re not selling them for school.

    They’re just exploited children working for some piece of scum who bought the school candy and knows people will feel sorry for the kids and give them money.

    That’s what’s 8 year old black peddlers are. In a few years she might be working as a street prostitute.

  73. @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    I am betting the new heat on White women will lead to them casting their lot with White men in the long run.

    Some of them are truly shocked to discover Black and Latino women don't really like them. And while men of Color want to tap that White body, they mostly don't like them as people either.


    I notice it's often the pretty White women who are gobsmacked the most. They've always been treated as goddesses. But plain White women are often much more realistic. They don't always get the special breaks. So give them the compassion.

    Replies: @Jesse, @dfordoom, @Alden

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

    Your and the rest of the women haters problem is that you’re so ugly and creepy you can’t get laid and that makes you bitter.

    It’s pretty obvious from reading the comments why you hate White women so much.

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    @Alden

    I'm not sure what I said that sounds anti-woman. LOL

    You don't save your race without women. My point is, yeah, there are some "fashionable" White women who have always gotten attention and been treated well despite being so anti-White.

    I'm sure that creates resentment by some men. But I am telling the men to remember there are tons of pro-White women out there and some of them are not fashion plates, they are real people suffering just like the White men.

  74. @Jesse
    @Anon

    Aw, I'm sowwy. I didn't realize this was a safe space for y'all to have a circle jerk. I assumed that, at some point, you'd want something real to happen.

    Serious question: for all the carping and screaming of the past few decades (at least) what tangible political or social results have you actually achieved? Anything? Anything at all?

    Right, nothing. And that is, in no small part, because other White people, especially the women and those left of center, find you repugnant. It's not the Jews, feminists or liberals that have dine for you. It's that you have, amazingly, managed to provide an even worse potential alternative to the Woke Stasi.

    And that's why the site stays up. It keeps the more fetid WN types where TPTB can see them, and it makes it clear to normal, decent Whites that racial consciousness means allying themselves with *waves hand around* this. And everyone here seems contend to vent all their frustrations, and somehow be convinced they're achieving something.

    Replies: @dfordoom, @Alden

    I believe one of their hands is not waving but busy lower down.

  75. Obviously, we can tolerate more rapes if it does something to diminish the crisis of too many racially-motivated 911 calls.

  76. @Alden
    @Old and Grumpy

    The Karens don’t despise and hate actual independent thinking women as much as The MEN OF UNZ do.

    Replies: @Mario Partisan

    Let me disabuse you of that idea. As a MAN OF UNZ, I don’t hate “actual independent thinking women” just like I don’t hate unicorns or the tooth fairy.

  77. @SunBakedSuburb
    @dfordoom

    You forgot to mention abortion. The majority of American women will gravitate towards the political entity that supports their right to choose. Women want ownership of their reproductive system. Imagine that.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    The majority of American women will gravitate towards the political entity that supports their right to choose.

    Like they do every January.

    Women want ownership of their reproductive system…

    …and of the men who have to pay for it. Or at least their wages. Imagine that.

    Women want ownership of their reproductive system.

    E pluribus unum? Out of many women, one reproductive system? Why does that sound more like a beehive or an anthill than anything human?

    Consider who is President today, and who is not– thanks to that “blue wall”.

    At March for Life, Trump shows he gets the power of abortion issue

    “The great thing about Donald Trump is that Donald Trump doesn’t care about what the establishment thinks.” –Marc Thiessen

    Apparently you do.

  78. @OilcanFloyd
    What happened to Becky? I guess being short for Rebecca, it just wasn't White Gentile enough. Because God knows that Jewish women are never mouthy, bossy, or entitled.

    I wonder if White women will learn anything from their inevitable fall from grace? Will many become angry at being used to destroy the country in exchange for a few AA jobs and a temporary place near the front of the rainbow coalition? Unfortunately, I'm not holding my breath.

    Replies: @El Dato, @MBlanc46

    They’ll learn nothing. Their fall from grace is something that they’ll blame on white men.

  79. @Gordo
    Time for our own White police?

    For White areas?

    With identifiable and defensible borders?

    White countries?

    Replies: @MBlanc46

    Long past time.

    • Agree: Gordo
  80. @Alden
    @Jesse

    The misogynist women hating MEN OF UNZ will be sure to donate to Shamamm Walton’s next campaign. And the next and the next till he becomes governor or at least Congress critter as soon as that evil Karen Pelosi retires.

    Replies: @MBlanc46

    We hate the sin, not the sinners.

  81. Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @JohnnyWalker123
    In Jewish-run "new" America, Blacks insult White women by calling them "Karen."

    In Gentile-run "old" America, Whites insulted Black men by calling them "boy."

    Way back in the 70s, (((Norman Lear))) and (((Rob Reiner))) let you know that "boy" was out of style.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwJ45NoWys

    Whites and Blacks struggling for "alpha male" dominance, with Jews being the arbiter of the match. Sort of interesting when you think about it.

    By the way, the Jews use much stronger language against Blacks in their own homeland.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

    Perhaps Gentiles should travel to Israel and teach the Jews how to treat their African migrants (and Palestinians). I wonder how they'd react.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @bomag, @anon, @S, @Anonymous

    From the second video posted:

    They have a home there!

    How can you call this expulsion? They’re going home!

    Every single civilized country would do the same.

    We’ll turn into a country of immigrants!

    But there are those who are hostile to the state, and therefore they want to turn it into a state of people from all over the world.

    We’ll bring in a million Africans, a half million Filipinos, 2 or 3 million Chinese, and that’s the end of it for Israel.

    Michael Ben-Ari

  82. The legal system of Wankanda! is far superior to either English Common Law or the Roman/French Civil Code.
    Yes, it is time to adopt Wankandian Jurisprudence.

  83. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites’ mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Enough trolling. There are no white men in Steve’s post.

  84. @AnotherDad
    America has tremendous social contention and polarization right now.

    But no one seems to be thinking "out of the box" on ways to address the core concerns of all stakeholders in the American project, to "bring us together" and to heal.

    Black women like Evan Nicole Brown are angry. Particularly when she thinks about black men and white women and cops. Why should white women be allow to call the cops on black men? ... like they own them! That's wrong! Black men belong to Black women. Evan is able to grow her hair long enough for breast length braids. But are black men noticing? Not enough! And that's a problem. Actually that's a crime! Evan Nicole is the one who should be calling the cops--not some flat assed Karen.

    We can, we must, fix this.

    #1 -- Black women should be able to call the police on any black man they see with a white woman. That should be a felony and those are the black men the cops need to arrest.
    #2 -- Black women should be able to call the police on any unmarried black man they fancy, who doesn't show any sexual interest in them. This would only be a misdemeanor, and could be dealt with a ticket and a firm warning--if the black man apologizes. If the black man agrees to take the woman out, the ticket and fine would be waived.

    Every month or two any Black woman who is tired of the single life, could sign up to enter her local community's Black marriage pool. The male side of the pool would consist of all black men who had been arrested for being seen with a white woman, or who had volunteered, or who turned say 32, without marrying a proud Black woman.

    These Black men and women would then compete in a mutual, dating and rating, matching TV show (like the Bachelor franchise). Every week men and women rating each other and pairing off for dates, seeing who they click with. Working toward black men proposing to Proud Black Women to be their wives. We'd call it Black Live Mating!

    In parallel, we'd have a program of mentoring black HS graduate boys in the construction trades. The illegals--"dreamers" included--would be sent home. All victim studies programs at colleges and universities would be closed, so if a black HS graduate didn't want to study something real or useful, this would a route forward. These newly minted black construction workers would be building new homes, schools, business space in new all black communities. Funding provided--in cash or materials--by BLM supporting big business.

    As Black Lives Mating couples match up--proposals made and accepted--the couple would immediately just "get it on" for the cameras. This would keep up male interest and make the show authentically black. The viewing audience would rate the couples, including on this effort, and the winning couple would be given a large, luxurious home in the new black neighborhood--reparations! The runners up, something less spacious/luxurious ... on down to the lowest rated matched couple in a modest bungalow or apartment. The couples would be pack off for their new neighborhood to begin their new lives of wedded Black bliss.

    These new couples could sell naming rights for the spawn of their on-air pro-creative efforts, to BLM supporting corporations. So instead of DeShitavious, these kids would start life with more white friendly names--Chevy, Ford, Coke, Pepsi, Tide, Ivory (ok, maybe not that one), Colt-45, Apple, Amazon, Google ... Pity the poor black boy stuck with naming rights from Microsoft ... but, hey, his parents would be laughing all the way to the bank.

    Black men who refused to propose, or were rejected, would be sent to enclosed "camps" where they would work out, learn a trade if they lacked job skills and work on their grooming and game. And return to the show six months or a year later. Repeated failures to land a big beautiful black woman, at past the age of say 45? ... they'd be sent back to Africa. Black women could re-enter the contest after an interval--say a year. But with repeated failures, the viewing audience could vote them back to Africa as well. This would encourage black women to improve their attitude and size issues, which in turn would improve the matching ratio ... and the happiness of the black marriages.

    Too often polarized Americans just harp on problems and yell at each other. But if we think creatively there are real solutions to these so-called "intractable" problems and opportunities to find common ground.

    Black Lives Mating would cut through the political noise and begin to address the "root causes" of black anger--not enough quality black men proposing marriage to Big Beautiful Black women.

    Kayne and Trump should co-host. Let's make (Black) America great again!

    Replies: @Rob McX

    Black women should be able to call the police on any black man they see with a white woman. That should be a felony and those are the black men the cops need to arrest.

    Unless he kills her. The black women on the OJ jury showed they were OK with that.

  85. @Jesse
    @RichardTaylor

    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them? The men with any realistic racial consciousness are so awful that they somehow make the alternative look good. The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.

    Hate to break it to ya, but showing up and sniping won't get you anywhere, especially since you're powerless and other Whites loathe you. At some point you're actually going to have to make alliances. Granted, breaking the habits of a century might be hard, but don't you get tired of epic losing?

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Mario Partisan

    The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.

    If a White man or woman is just making calculations ONLY about their own life and couldn’t care less about the future of their descendants, then there’s no reaching them anyway.

    • Replies: @Jesse
    @RichardTaylor

    You do realize that material benefit includes whatever let's you raise a family, or even have kids in the first place?

    WN men would rather have a nice little circle jerk, and reassure each other that literally everyone else is the problem. They're less effective (!) SJWs - it's not your job to educate us! Everyone else should just do exactly what you want with no effort on your part! Alliances are for cucks! You LIKE getting nothing of what you want, rather then compromising with real life White people!

    They're like those women who dress dowdily, wear no makeup, never smile, and then complain about patriarchal beauty standards. Except you lot manage to somehow be worse, what with your plan to explicitly torpedo most of the race you claim to be fighting for.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor

  86. @Alden
    @RichardTaylor

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

    Your and the rest of the women haters problem is that you’re so ugly and creepy you can’t get laid and that makes you bitter.

    It’s pretty obvious from reading the comments why you hate White women so much.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor

    I’m not sure what I said that sounds anti-woman. LOL

    You don’t save your race without women. My point is, yeah, there are some “fashionable” White women who have always gotten attention and been treated well despite being so anti-White.

    I’m sure that creates resentment by some men. But I am telling the men to remember there are tons of pro-White women out there and some of them are not fashion plates, they are real people suffering just like the White men.

  87. @Jesse
    @RichardTaylor

    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them? The men with any realistic racial consciousness are so awful that they somehow make the alternative look good. The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.

    Hate to break it to ya, but showing up and sniping won't get you anywhere, especially since you're powerless and other Whites loathe you. At some point you're actually going to have to make alliances. Granted, breaking the habits of a century might be hard, but don't you get tired of epic losing?

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Mario Partisan

    I suspect I understand your purpose here, but I am going to assume that you are here in good faith, and respond to you. I am going to assume you are female, and whether I am right or wrong, I am right.

    So, assuming your good faith, it seems that your purpose is to make the “WN” men in the UR commentariat aware that their honest talk, i.e. “misogyny” is hurting the conservative movement, by alienating white females.

    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them?

    Your comments echo your sister “Alden.”

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

    The problem as I see it with your comments is that it assumes that the path to gaining the alliance of white women is to “respect” them. Boy, is that something I had to unlearn the hard way; and I say that on a purely personal level, as I don’t consider myself a WN politically.

    The US and European nations have reached a point at which intra-white gender relations are at an all-time low, not after a period of patriarchal ascendancy, but decades after the triumph of feminism, the entry of women into the workforce and college. As a whole, when white women demanded “liberation” white men got on their knees and said “yes, Karen, my princess.”

    Your sister Karen smelled weakness in white men for acquiescing to her demands, and decided to leave her husband and children for a joy ride on the Quantavius cock carousel.

    In short, white men are paying for their respect and kindness, not for their sexism. Haven’t you heard: nice guys finish last.

    And, to an extent, this is very understandable once one understands how the dynamics of the female gestation period, the extreme investment humans (women and men) must place in raising their young and the forces of evolution have worked together to shape the female psyche.

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft, brains became more important than brawn, the risks associated with child birth and rearing were largely removed, and the incentive for a woman to forgo a life of carefree fornication for a stable but boring life with a provider evaporated.

    It is interesting that second wave feminism initially appeared on the scene well into the post-war technological boom and following the humiliation that young American men received in Indo-china. It is almost like a sudden, society-wide female shit test hit the men of America. “Equality Now” demanded the female cerebellums; “Put me in my place” screamed the female limbic systems. We listened, respected your words, and thus, failed the shit test.

    Having failed the initial shit test, a series of never ending tests descended upon us, to the point where universities were enacting “affirmative consent” policies that turn an act of passion into a series of legal documents to be signed. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the men who need to hear that BS, the Quantavii, aren’t going to care one bit, while the only men who will give it the time of day don’t need it. It only serves to reduce the self confidence of mild mannered white and Asian dudes, further reducing their perceived sexual market value. What a sadistic con!

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW. It’s almost like someone wants us dead.

    The fact is, there are two types of men for every woman: men who are worthy of their wombs and men who are not. A man who you deem worthy of your womb can say and do anything to you and you will enjoy it; a man who is not deemed worthy can’t do or say anything right.

    Why would white women team up with WN (or even just white) men, you ask. I don’t know. But what I can say with confidence is that your decision not to do so has nothing to do with the beliefs of those men or their manner of expressing those beliefs. You simply smell the consensus in the society at large, understand the nature of inter-racial power dynamics, and have decided that white men are not worthy of your womb. Their “epic losing” has nothing to do with them not respecting you. You don’t respect them because of their epic losing, and that started when their boomer dads bowed to their boomer mothers.

    So, what is your purpose here? Your purpose is to gleefully pile on and to engage in an emotionally incontinent power play over men you consider out of your league. Jesse, you are a Karen. Congrats!

    • Thanks: Mr Mox
    • Replies: @Jesse
    @Mario Partisan

    Serious thanks for proving my point. Also, it's another example of classic divide and conquer. You've spent the last few decades achieving precisely nothing and watching your world disintegrate. Instead of going after capitalism, race hucksters etc., you've decided the problem is...White women. Bravo.

    You know that eye roll you give when feminists whine about how awful men are? How they're clearly just ensconced in a low quality pool? Yeah. You're the male equivalent. And whining that women are sooooo meeeeeeaaaaaan you gaize, and you could be sooooooo great if they'd just kiss your ass doesn't exactly fill anyone with confidence about your leadership abilities.

    , @anon
    @Mario Partisan

    https://media.giphy.com/media/g9582DNuQppxC/giphy-downsized-large.gif

    , @Sam Malone
    @Mario Partisan


    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft,
     

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW.
     
    Absolutely outstanding comment in total, good enough for me to copy and save. Please keep it up.
  88. @Old and Grumpy
    I'm sorry, but the Karens are a royal pain in the rear. It isn't that they want to makes things right and perfect, they want everyone to bend to their current whim they picked up from watching the likes of The View. These gals want to be leaders despite having the ultimate herd mindset. They despise actual independent thinking women. So in kind, I don't like them with the exception of my sister.

    The brownies going after them is kinda funny to me due to their pet like love for all brown humans. All this "Caren" thing will do is cause them double down while blaming white men. Sorry but its what the TV tells them to do. If you men want to still save them, good luck.

    Replies: @Alden, @Fluesterwitz

    While there certainly are woman who behave in the defined Karen manner this does not mean that all woman described as Karens fit the type. Considering how the the Karen trope is used politically, I presume most don’t. If it is an example of divide and rule, it appears to work.

  89. @Mario Partisan
    @Jesse

    I suspect I understand your purpose here, but I am going to assume that you are here in good faith, and respond to you. I am going to assume you are female, and whether I am right or wrong, I am right.

    So, assuming your good faith, it seems that your purpose is to make the “WN” men in the UR commentariat aware that their honest talk, i.e. “misogyny” is hurting the conservative movement, by alienating white females.


    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them?
     
    Your comments echo your sister “Alden.”

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

     

    The problem as I see it with your comments is that it assumes that the path to gaining the alliance of white women is to “respect” them. Boy, is that something I had to unlearn the hard way; and I say that on a purely personal level, as I don’t consider myself a WN politically.

    The US and European nations have reached a point at which intra-white gender relations are at an all-time low, not after a period of patriarchal ascendancy, but decades after the triumph of feminism, the entry of women into the workforce and college. As a whole, when white women demanded “liberation” white men got on their knees and said “yes, Karen, my princess.”

    Your sister Karen smelled weakness in white men for acquiescing to her demands, and decided to leave her husband and children for a joy ride on the Quantavius cock carousel.

    In short, white men are paying for their respect and kindness, not for their sexism. Haven’t you heard: nice guys finish last.

    And, to an extent, this is very understandable once one understands how the dynamics of the female gestation period, the extreme investment humans (women and men) must place in raising their young and the forces of evolution have worked together to shape the female psyche.

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft, brains became more important than brawn, the risks associated with child birth and rearing were largely removed, and the incentive for a woman to forgo a life of carefree fornication for a stable but boring life with a provider evaporated.

    It is interesting that second wave feminism initially appeared on the scene well into the post-war technological boom and following the humiliation that young American men received in Indo-china. It is almost like a sudden, society-wide female shit test hit the men of America. “Equality Now” demanded the female cerebellums; “Put me in my place” screamed the female limbic systems. We listened, respected your words, and thus, failed the shit test.

    Having failed the initial shit test, a series of never ending tests descended upon us, to the point where universities were enacting “affirmative consent” policies that turn an act of passion into a series of legal documents to be signed. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the men who need to hear that BS, the Quantavii, aren’t going to care one bit, while the only men who will give it the time of day don’t need it. It only serves to reduce the self confidence of mild mannered white and Asian dudes, further reducing their perceived sexual market value. What a sadistic con!

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW. It’s almost like someone wants us dead.

    The fact is, there are two types of men for every woman: men who are worthy of their wombs and men who are not. A man who you deem worthy of your womb can say and do anything to you and you will enjoy it; a man who is not deemed worthy can’t do or say anything right.

    Why would white women team up with WN (or even just white) men, you ask. I don’t know. But what I can say with confidence is that your decision not to do so has nothing to do with the beliefs of those men or their manner of expressing those beliefs. You simply smell the consensus in the society at large, understand the nature of inter-racial power dynamics, and have decided that white men are not worthy of your womb. Their “epic losing” has nothing to do with them not respecting you. You don’t respect them because of their epic losing, and that started when their boomer dads bowed to their boomer mothers.

    So, what is your purpose here? Your purpose is to gleefully pile on and to engage in an emotionally incontinent power play over men you consider out of your league. Jesse, you are a Karen. Congrats!

    Replies: @Jesse, @anon, @Sam Malone

    Serious thanks for proving my point. Also, it’s another example of classic divide and conquer. You’ve spent the last few decades achieving precisely nothing and watching your world disintegrate. Instead of going after capitalism, race hucksters etc., you’ve decided the problem is…White women. Bravo.

    You know that eye roll you give when feminists whine about how awful men are? How they’re clearly just ensconced in a low quality pool? Yeah. You’re the male equivalent. And whining that women are sooooo meeeeeeaaaaaan you gaize, and you could be sooooooo great if they’d just kiss your ass doesn’t exactly fill anyone with confidence about your leadership abilities.

  90. @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse


    The women might as well go for whichever side will benefit them materially.
     
    If a White man or woman is just making calculations ONLY about their own life and couldn't care less about the future of their descendants, then there's no reaching them anyway.

    Replies: @Jesse

    You do realize that material benefit includes whatever let’s you raise a family, or even have kids in the first place?

    WN men would rather have a nice little circle jerk, and reassure each other that literally everyone else is the problem. They’re less effective (!) SJWs – it’s not your job to educate us! Everyone else should just do exactly what you want with no effort on your part! Alliances are for cucks! You LIKE getting nothing of what you want, rather then compromising with real life White people!

    They’re like those women who dress dowdily, wear no makeup, never smile, and then complain about patriarchal beauty standards. Except you lot manage to somehow be worse, what with your plan to explicitly torpedo most of the race you claim to be fighting for.

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    @Jesse

    Well I'm not part of any anti-woman WN crowd. Or a WN crowd for that matter.

    I'm not sure what I said that you find a problem. I said a lot of White women are shocked to find out that POC aren't really their allies. Do you disagree with that?

  91. @Mario Partisan
    @Jesse

    I suspect I understand your purpose here, but I am going to assume that you are here in good faith, and respond to you. I am going to assume you are female, and whether I am right or wrong, I am right.

    So, assuming your good faith, it seems that your purpose is to make the “WN” men in the UR commentariat aware that their honest talk, i.e. “misogyny” is hurting the conservative movement, by alienating white females.


    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them?
     
    Your comments echo your sister “Alden.”

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

     

    The problem as I see it with your comments is that it assumes that the path to gaining the alliance of white women is to “respect” them. Boy, is that something I had to unlearn the hard way; and I say that on a purely personal level, as I don’t consider myself a WN politically.

    The US and European nations have reached a point at which intra-white gender relations are at an all-time low, not after a period of patriarchal ascendancy, but decades after the triumph of feminism, the entry of women into the workforce and college. As a whole, when white women demanded “liberation” white men got on their knees and said “yes, Karen, my princess.”

    Your sister Karen smelled weakness in white men for acquiescing to her demands, and decided to leave her husband and children for a joy ride on the Quantavius cock carousel.

    In short, white men are paying for their respect and kindness, not for their sexism. Haven’t you heard: nice guys finish last.

    And, to an extent, this is very understandable once one understands how the dynamics of the female gestation period, the extreme investment humans (women and men) must place in raising their young and the forces of evolution have worked together to shape the female psyche.

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft, brains became more important than brawn, the risks associated with child birth and rearing were largely removed, and the incentive for a woman to forgo a life of carefree fornication for a stable but boring life with a provider evaporated.

    It is interesting that second wave feminism initially appeared on the scene well into the post-war technological boom and following the humiliation that young American men received in Indo-china. It is almost like a sudden, society-wide female shit test hit the men of America. “Equality Now” demanded the female cerebellums; “Put me in my place” screamed the female limbic systems. We listened, respected your words, and thus, failed the shit test.

    Having failed the initial shit test, a series of never ending tests descended upon us, to the point where universities were enacting “affirmative consent” policies that turn an act of passion into a series of legal documents to be signed. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the men who need to hear that BS, the Quantavii, aren’t going to care one bit, while the only men who will give it the time of day don’t need it. It only serves to reduce the self confidence of mild mannered white and Asian dudes, further reducing their perceived sexual market value. What a sadistic con!

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW. It’s almost like someone wants us dead.

    The fact is, there are two types of men for every woman: men who are worthy of their wombs and men who are not. A man who you deem worthy of your womb can say and do anything to you and you will enjoy it; a man who is not deemed worthy can’t do or say anything right.

    Why would white women team up with WN (or even just white) men, you ask. I don’t know. But what I can say with confidence is that your decision not to do so has nothing to do with the beliefs of those men or their manner of expressing those beliefs. You simply smell the consensus in the society at large, understand the nature of inter-racial power dynamics, and have decided that white men are not worthy of your womb. Their “epic losing” has nothing to do with them not respecting you. You don’t respect them because of their epic losing, and that started when their boomer dads bowed to their boomer mothers.

    So, what is your purpose here? Your purpose is to gleefully pile on and to engage in an emotionally incontinent power play over men you consider out of your league. Jesse, you are a Karen. Congrats!

    Replies: @Jesse, @anon, @Sam Malone

  92. @Jack D
    @S

    The term persists in the name "busboy" which is still used. Because of child labor laws, menial jobs that were once done by children or young teens (e.g. bellboy, shoe shine boy) are now done by full grown adults but the "boy" description still sometimes attaches. In other cases ("ball boy") the job is still done by children (though often nowadays by girls).

    Naturally, being the lowest skilled, the grown men who replaced children in these menial jobs were often black but the job title was still "boy" - there was no racial angle. In the old days, IQ was sometimes express as mental age, so it's not surprising that a job once done by a white 12 year old would become one that a black 16+ year old was capable of in the age of child labor laws.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    In a film crew there are two kinds of best boy: best boy electric and best boy grip. They are assistants to their department heads, the gaffer (in charge of electricals) and the key grip (lighting and rigging), respectively. In short, the best boy acts as the foreman for his department.

  93. @BB753
    I suspect that the War on Karens is simply a part of the greater World War Hair, as described by Steve Sailer. Women of not-so-good Hair resent Women of Good Hair. And the war rages on.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Matt Buckalew

    No that’s just Steve’s misogynistic spin likely born of his own bastardy and abandonment as a child. Also a little resentment because Steve probably sees himself as a border line chad whose geekiness kept him from fucking like a tall ex-jock should have fucked. Also Steve kind of worships status so he thinks -hey if I was a chick I’d fuck any dude with status who looked twice at me so that must be how women feel.

  94. The mayor of Chicago:

    • Replies: @anon
    @Jim Don Bob

    Would it be bad to go to a Chitown council meeting and yell "BEETLEJUICE" three times? Would it?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

  95. @Jesse
    @RichardTaylor

    You do realize that material benefit includes whatever let's you raise a family, or even have kids in the first place?

    WN men would rather have a nice little circle jerk, and reassure each other that literally everyone else is the problem. They're less effective (!) SJWs - it's not your job to educate us! Everyone else should just do exactly what you want with no effort on your part! Alliances are for cucks! You LIKE getting nothing of what you want, rather then compromising with real life White people!

    They're like those women who dress dowdily, wear no makeup, never smile, and then complain about patriarchal beauty standards. Except you lot manage to somehow be worse, what with your plan to explicitly torpedo most of the race you claim to be fighting for.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor

    Well I’m not part of any anti-woman WN crowd. Or a WN crowd for that matter.

    I’m not sure what I said that you find a problem. I said a lot of White women are shocked to find out that POC aren’t really their allies. Do you disagree with that?

  96. @Jim Don Bob
    The mayor of Chicago:

    https://pjmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Math.png

    Replies: @anon

    Would it be bad to go to a Chitown council meeting and yell “BEETLEJUICE” three times? Would it?

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @anon


    Would it be bad to go to a Chitown council meeting and yell “BEETLEJUICE” three times? Would it?
     
    Dangerous perhaps.

    And what's with all these lezzies in power? Every time you turn around there's some hyphenated lesbo mayor or police chief on TV rattling on about structural racism and sheeit.
  97. @anon
    @Jim Don Bob

    Would it be bad to go to a Chitown council meeting and yell "BEETLEJUICE" three times? Would it?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    Would it be bad to go to a Chitown council meeting and yell “BEETLEJUICE” three times? Would it?

    Dangerous perhaps.

    And what’s with all these lezzies in power? Every time you turn around there’s some hyphenated lesbo mayor or police chief on TV rattling on about structural racism and sheeit.

  98. @Mario Partisan
    @Jesse

    I suspect I understand your purpose here, but I am going to assume that you are here in good faith, and respond to you. I am going to assume you are female, and whether I am right or wrong, I am right.

    So, assuming your good faith, it seems that your purpose is to make the “WN” men in the UR commentariat aware that their honest talk, i.e. “misogyny” is hurting the conservative movement, by alienating white females.


    You fail to understand how many White men are gleefully piling on, and how vile it all is. Why on earth would White women team up with them?
     
    Your comments echo your sister “Alden.”

    Any White women who spends a few hours going over the comments by the MEN OF UNZ would never ally herself with White men.

     

    The problem as I see it with your comments is that it assumes that the path to gaining the alliance of white women is to “respect” them. Boy, is that something I had to unlearn the hard way; and I say that on a purely personal level, as I don’t consider myself a WN politically.

    The US and European nations have reached a point at which intra-white gender relations are at an all-time low, not after a period of patriarchal ascendancy, but decades after the triumph of feminism, the entry of women into the workforce and college. As a whole, when white women demanded “liberation” white men got on their knees and said “yes, Karen, my princess.”

    Your sister Karen smelled weakness in white men for acquiescing to her demands, and decided to leave her husband and children for a joy ride on the Quantavius cock carousel.

    In short, white men are paying for their respect and kindness, not for their sexism. Haven’t you heard: nice guys finish last.

    And, to an extent, this is very understandable once one understands how the dynamics of the female gestation period, the extreme investment humans (women and men) must place in raising their young and the forces of evolution have worked together to shape the female psyche.

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft, brains became more important than brawn, the risks associated with child birth and rearing were largely removed, and the incentive for a woman to forgo a life of carefree fornication for a stable but boring life with a provider evaporated.

    It is interesting that second wave feminism initially appeared on the scene well into the post-war technological boom and following the humiliation that young American men received in Indo-china. It is almost like a sudden, society-wide female shit test hit the men of America. “Equality Now” demanded the female cerebellums; “Put me in my place” screamed the female limbic systems. We listened, respected your words, and thus, failed the shit test.

    Having failed the initial shit test, a series of never ending tests descended upon us, to the point where universities were enacting “affirmative consent” policies that turn an act of passion into a series of legal documents to be signed. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the men who need to hear that BS, the Quantavii, aren’t going to care one bit, while the only men who will give it the time of day don’t need it. It only serves to reduce the self confidence of mild mannered white and Asian dudes, further reducing their perceived sexual market value. What a sadistic con!

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW. It’s almost like someone wants us dead.

    The fact is, there are two types of men for every woman: men who are worthy of their wombs and men who are not. A man who you deem worthy of your womb can say and do anything to you and you will enjoy it; a man who is not deemed worthy can’t do or say anything right.

    Why would white women team up with WN (or even just white) men, you ask. I don’t know. But what I can say with confidence is that your decision not to do so has nothing to do with the beliefs of those men or their manner of expressing those beliefs. You simply smell the consensus in the society at large, understand the nature of inter-racial power dynamics, and have decided that white men are not worthy of your womb. Their “epic losing” has nothing to do with them not respecting you. You don’t respect them because of their epic losing, and that started when their boomer dads bowed to their boomer mothers.

    So, what is your purpose here? Your purpose is to gleefully pile on and to engage in an emotionally incontinent power play over men you consider out of your league. Jesse, you are a Karen. Congrats!

    Replies: @Jesse, @anon, @Sam Malone

    In short, women are programmed by evolution to pursue the qualities in men that signal skill in resource acquisition: physical strength, bravery, risk-taking, confidence, and to a lesser extent, intelligence.

    Part of the difficulties for white men is that historically we had these various qualities in such a balance in our societies that they propelled us to heights of technological achievement the world has never seen. These efforts were an investment we made in you and in ourselves to pacify the struggle for existence, to attenuate the brutality and capriciousness of nature. But in doing so, we became somewhat soft,

    By now we have reached a cultural zeitgeist where no orientation that a white man can have towards women is acceptable. Pursuing traditional monogamy makes one an evil patriarch; being a successful pick-up artist makes one an objectifier and user of women; unsuccessful pursuing of women makes one a creepy incel; and avoiding women all together makes one an evil, sexist MGTOW.

    Absolutely outstanding comment in total, good enough for me to copy and save. Please keep it up.

  99. @Jesse
    Gotta hand it to them, this is a beautiful example of divide and conquer. Show White women that *enough* White men (including many here) hate them, and play on younger Whites' mommy issues (Daddy issues are so déclassé), and you destroy the modicum of racial unity that kept Hillary out.

    Replies: @Lowe, @RichardTaylor, @Anon, @Alden, @Pop Warner, @ben tillman, @RichardTaylor

    Nobody thinks White men are driving the anti-White woman fashion. You don’t either.

    But both White men and White women need to learn, they only have each other.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS