RSS
From the New York Times news section:
Pushing an Immigration Conspiracy Theory, While Courting Latinos
Blake Masters, a top candidate in Arizona’s Republican primary for the Senate, has accused Democrats of plotting to “import” new voters. That poses a challenge in a state where a third of the voters are Hispanic.
By Jennifer Medina
July 29, 2022, 1:20 p.m. ETBlake Masters, a venture capitalist running for Senate in Arizona, is among the many Republicans who argue that the left’s obsession with racial identity politics is driving Latino voters away from the Democratic Party.
But as he vies for the Republican nomination, Mr. Masters has pushed a different sort of racial politics that could repel Latinos in the state.
For months, Mr. Masters has promoted a specious theory portraying illegal immigration across the southern border as part of an elaborate Democratic power grab.
The reasons this conspiracy theory are specious are [TK]. And, anyway, it’s a conspiracy theory.
In speeches, social media videos and podcast interviews, he has asserted that Democrats are trying to encourage immigration so their party can dilute the political power of native-born voters.
When everybody knows that Democrats are instead trying to encourage immigration because it’s who we are according to Founding Father Emma Lazarus’s Zeroth Amendment to the Constitution. Or something. The details don’t really matter. What matters is the essence of the situation: the Republicans are the Bad Guys so anything that helps the Democrats win is Good. Not that Democrats encouraging immigration helps them win. That’s just a conspiracy theory.
Look, let me try to break it down nice and simple … Who do you hate? White male Republicans, right? Why do you hate them? Because they are hateful, of course. Therefore, you hate them.
“What the left really wants to do is change the demographics of this country,” Mr. Masters said in a video posted to Twitter last fall. “They do. They want to do that so they can consolidate power and so they can never lose another election.” In May, he told an interviewer that Democrats were “trying to manufacture and import” a new electorate.
What Mr. Masters calls an “obvious truth” is what experts in extremism
They are experts. They don’t have any political biases because they are experts.
describe as a sanitized version of the “great replacement,” a once-fringe, racist conspiracy theory that claims that Western elites, sometimes manipulated by Jews, want to replace white Americans with immigrants to weaken the influence of white culture. The idea has been linked to the massacre at a Buffalo supermarket in May, the El Paso Walmart shooting in 2019 and the killings at a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018.
Mr. Masters’s version — one that makes no references to Jews or white people, but instead sets up a conflict between immigrants and the native-born — has become pervasive in Republicans’ immigration rhetoric. It has risen to prominence alongside the debunked claims that immigrants living in the United States illegally are voting in elections in large numbers.
“This is a view in which there are institutional bad actors maliciously causing change, which will then lead to political subordination of whites,” said Robert A. Pape, the director of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago. “That is the root of the fear, and that’s the root of what the fearmongers are provoking.”
Mr. Masters, who declined to be interviewed, disputes that he has promoted the great replacement theory.
“It is obvious to everyone that Democrats see illegal immigrants as future voters,” he said in a statement. “No ‘theory’ is needed to observe that.” He criticized “fake experts” who claimed otherwise.
Mr. Masters is widely expected to win in the Arizona primary on Tuesday.
Seriously, the crazy thing is that it took until 2022 for GOP candidates to start pointing out how Democrats try to import ringers to rig American elections down the road.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thou shalt not notice facts contrary to the Democrat narrative.
Feminism: We are men!
It is kind of a crazy theory when you realize how much every Republican from the Bushes to major donors to little Marco to Paul Ryan LOVE pushing immigration.
Trump single-handedly put this issue on the table but Steve hates to give crass orange man any credit.
Coulter even gives a hat tip to iSteve on occasion. When she does, she cheekily calls him "journalist Steve Sailer."
Implying that we’ve flooded the country with third-world migrants poses a challenge in this country, which (coincidentally) we’ve flooded with third-world migrants.
NYT is right about this, as it was the NYT who did the spurious linking. At some point all NYT articles will merely cite other NYT articles as their sources, and thereby achieve a self-referential singularity of woke authority.
It's certainly true that the elites are trying to replace and ultimately eliminate whites. Jennifer Rubin alone proves this beyond all doubt. Imagine if a goy cheered the fact that more Jews are dying than being born.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jrubinblogger/status/1425899248269266947?lang=en
Having said this, they're not trying to replace us with ADOS. They use ADOS as a bioweapon against whites but they don't want the black population to increase either, hence their nuclear meltdown about SCOTUS actually reading the constitution and ruling based on an honest interpretation of it.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Prester John
Bingo!
Conservatives need way better politicians. Meaning one’s who will actually bother to bring up the most obvious attacks against Americans and orient their campaigns–and then their work in office–toward stopping them, toward actually conserving something.
Absolute layups:
— Democrats loving poor immigrants, because they can give them services and get their votes
— Democrats–as the state party–love balkanization “diversity” because they then grow their power managing it and bossing people around
— immigration wage suppression
— immigration driving up housing prices–making marriage, family and unaffordable; “you can’t afford to get married … thank a Democrat”; “you have no grandchildren? … thank a Democrat”
— “Parasite Party”; the Democrats are a coalition of parasites, the unproductive; from the criminals, to the welfare cases, to social service bureaucracy, the to the various useless paper pushers and minders; to their propagandists from academia, news media, NGOs, government, Hollyweird.
— destroying rule of law;
— there can only be one set of public norms/laws; if blacks don’t want to obey “white” law … fine; then separate communities/nation
— “the George Floyd Party”
— “Democrat crime wave”
— (more complicated) St. Fauci, the Wuhan lab; time serving bureaucrat able to threaten and bribe scientists to stifle dissent; terrible Covid advice; lockdowns
— it’s a “marriage gap” not a “gender gap”–sure the Democrats do better with emotional appeals to women, but the big thing is they want women to be single and government dependent; women who are married with children get smarter and start to think about the interests of their children, their future
— “what is a woman”, “i am not a biologist”
— trannies women’s sports
— poisoning girls
— separation — basically the “who/whom” of parasitism … you want to do crazy fine; leave us alone, don’t impose your crazy on us; “you need us, we don’t need you”
This stuff writes itself. We simply need “conservative” politicians who are willing to fight and actually want to conserve stuff.
Even; the reason your 35 year old son with a masters in math degree is barely working as a substitute teacher in the nastiest black schools in the district is because he is a White American born man the most discriminated against demographic in America doesn’t change their minds.Replies: @Justvisiting
The inability of the GOP to even attempt this layup is because for the last 40 years there has been an unholy alliance between a left desperate to tilt the electorate and a corporate right that cared more about delivering cheap labor and tax cuts to their Chamber of Commerce sponsors than winning future elections. As much as I loath the left, they at least try to win whereas the Republicans have been largely content to be the Washington Generals who gamely lose night after night to the Globetrotters.
Both parties love mass immigration. The GOP loves it for diluting the economic power of the productive class, while the Dems love it for diluting our political power
Most people I know are convinced that politics is a team sport. You have to support your team through thick and thin, whether they are good or bad. It’s your team! You don’t want the other team to win, do you? Well then there you are.
Well, Masters has a clue.
OT: Steve, you may enjoy this discussion of how many gay men are fed up with being pushed around for agreeing that maybe, just maybe, we can slow down on the orgies.
There’s a lot of “who ARE these hysterical queens online defending this crap?” A feeling I think many of us have had when the new shitlib narrative comes out. Gay liberals apparently also don’t know who these people are or who put them in charge.
*you'd think that 1964 Los Angeles was 50% black after seeing this movie.
https://youtu.be/pUR5nik2DKUReplies: @Anonymous
“News.”
It’s “specious” I tells ya. And really, really elaborate: Bringing in more client/voters. Complex!
Oh, and in the next breath Democrats boast about changing demographics turning red states purple and eventually blue.
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Very late in the game. We half-wits recognized this 30 years ago, but cucks gonna cuck, neo-cons gonna neo-con.
I wonder if it’s too late to do anything about it. My guess is the Republicans will quadruple-down on the absurd notion that “immigrants are natural Republicans” (even the MAGAS will go for this), the thin-reed they have been grasping for the past 20 years or so, the flood will continue, and the awful, unyielding demographic reality will overwhelm us all. Lights out.
The pundit class keeps trying to rely on this old 1960s race playbook when the movement of blacks and latinos has nothing to do with rhetoric (let alone your framed photo of you marching with Martin) and everything to do with recent concrete demonstrated economic policy.
That said, Kari Lake ought to handily win in Arizona. In Michigan former police chief James Craig was backstabbed by shameless political operators and will only continue as a candidate if he can survive a write-in primary this Tuesday.
This is just crazy conspiracy. Everyone knows that they are crossing the border so they can vote for Gavin Newsom in ’24.
No lies detected. Amazing to see these words in the NYT regardless of context.
For G-d’s sake, the left openly celebrates the replacement of Whites in America!
They celebrate whatever they want whenever they want, but when we notice something and complain: it's hate, conspiracy theory, etc
On the political front, I do think it would be wise for the Republicans to position themselves for the 2024 election by making their approach less “Biden-centric.” We all know he was put in as an electable sorta-regular white guy front man for the various ideological fanatics, anti-white racists, green grifters, Oligarch economic interests, etc. actually driving his administration. What we don’t want is to see him function as a kind of ablative shield, burned away by the super-heated disapproval generated by all the of the many failures and outright disasters of his administration, but ultimately protecting the polices behind him. I think the plan is, with, of course, the full collusion of the media and usual suspects, to try to vanish the policy failures along with him when he gets shoved out. “A shame actually,” they will say as they gently escort him off the stage, “he tried his best, forced to deal with rabidly partisan Republicans who refused to work with us as our Democracy requires, sadly hobbled by some cognitive decline, which only showed up after he took office, and victimized by a terrible economy resulting from circumstances outside of his control. Still, we should always be grateful that he saved us from a Trump dictatorship.”
Now, we have a fresh new candidate, let’s forget all that and start all over.
I assume that slimy reptile Newsome will be the replacement. They say that sometimes the job calls to the man. In Newsome’s case, the Presidency is clearly hissing: “Slither over here.” In addition to the Democratic base, at least to the extent they don’t already overlap, he’ll be getting the votes of all those women who buy books because the author’s pic on the back shows a good-looking guy.
I think the best strategy for the Republicans is to always tie the administration’s failures to Democrats, not Biden, or even Kamala, notwithstanding the juicy targets they present. Just try over and over to link the Democrats, to the economy and other failures. Democrats and gas prices, Democrats and inflation, Democrats and supply chain shortages, Democrats and Afghanistan. It is, of course, the truth and would reduce the prospect of Disposable Joe taking most of the “heat” with him when he goes.
Why are these two points in logical opposition such that “but” is necessary?
The media constantly brings this trope that appealing (or pandering) to Latino Americans is somehow opposite, philosophically or politically, to opposing illegal Latino immigration.
It’s either that the media treats identity as the sole relevant factor in politics, or it’s just a form of gaslighting. Either way, I suspect many legitimate American beaners resent it.
Oh, and Steve has now been mentioned by Red Scare for the third episode in a row.
They’re at the point where they’re saying, “we need to quit talking about Steve Sailer.”
Time to go on the pod, Steve! Join Zizek, Alex Jones, Glenn greenwald, Tulsi Gabbard, moldbug, and host of other internet sensations!
OT — where were your sheep when New Zealand became a source of good news about lockdown justice?
Today, Liberty Counsel settled the nation’s first classwide lawsuit for healthcare workers over a COVID shot mandate, for more than \$10.3 million.
The class action settlement against NorthShore University HealthSystem is on behalf of more than 500 current and former healthcare workers who were unlawfully discriminated against and denied religious exemptions from the COVID shot mandate.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/healthcare-worker-settlement-covid-vaccine-mandate-class-action-lawsuit/
If diversity is a strength that Whites should celebrate, why do the elites feel the need to deny that they are intentionally orchestrating it? Shouldn’t they rather be trying to take all the credit?
They they even use the term “conspiracy theory” proves that they know they are gravely harming Whites. After all, noone has a problem with someone “conspiring” to do them a favor.
So what’s the official line on the great replacement theory? Everybody knows it’s happening. Simple arithmetic makes that clear. Are we supposed to believe it’s just accidental? That nobody planned or wanted it? And if that’s the case, why do they all unite against anyone who tries to stop it?
Blake is great, but at some point, someone on the right may need to make an explicit racial argument—but when they do, there’s no reason it needs to “repel” nonwhite voters. Most of them want to live in a mostly white country too.
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”
So far, one huge (paradoxically stabilizing, for now) factor in America is the implicit threat of massive (White) right-wing civilian violence should national events boil over. It is often played by the Right as irony both anonymously online and in some recent spicy political ads (“RINO hunting”), but everyone is aware of the possibility.
Still, the Left keeps tempting fate, like the recent House vote to try to ban “assault weapons”. They’re lucky (for now) that the Senate is there to save them (and the rest of us) from the immediate consequences of a 50% or higher pro-ban vote getting to senile Biden’s desk. The Democrats will have further dodged a bullet if and when the Supreme Court rules “assault weapon” bans unconstitutional.
Where does this leave the mainstream Right at the moment? Non-racial political arguments against immigration coupled with an ongoing ‘egalitarian’ live-and-let-die universally-armed economically segregated Brazilification of the US (low-intensity “mutual combat” coexistence model) will be the likely course until a possible flashover of irreconcilable converging trends that results in hot civil war.Replies: @Dave Pinsen
Unfortunately, a great many people vote based on their feelings. Even if they intuitively understand the demographic basis for good schools, good neighborhoods, and good nations, and orient their own decisions to be in proximity to these demographics, they don’t want to explicitly admit that they need Whitey, which is what voting for the party of the Stern (White) Dad with a Short-Cropped Haircut Telling You To Clean Up Your Act would be a tacit admission of.
This is compounded by the inferiority complexes which are not only present but actively cultivated in members of the “marginalized classes.” Even if as individuals they are competent and intelligent, or have the capacity to be, racial (or religious, or “sexual” or “gender” minorities) are encouraged to identify themselves with the benighted masses of their cohort and with the pathologies that are rampant amongst them (whether because of racism or something else).
A mulatto professional making six figures may live in New Levittown, with a lightskint schoolteacher wife and even lighter kids who play violin alongside Bao and soccer with Jorge and get taken by Chad to homecoming, but it still gets the blood pumping when he listens to Malcolm X’s speech on white liberals, notwithstanding that these are all his friends and also the party that he ends up voting for.
I am racially a mestizo, but I am more intelligent than 99% of people anyone of any race, and I am several generations removed from Mexico, and neither I nor my parents even speak Spanish. I also pride myself on my objectivity. So I don’t feel offended or personally slighted when, say, Trump says Mexico is sending rapists to America, because it is true, and I have successfully rooted out the inferiority complex instilled in me through my childhood and adolescence by the lugenpresse that would previously have led me to identify with double-digit IQ rapists from a country I’ve never even been to because we both have Spanish last names.
So, to make a long story short, I think this framing is 1) obviously true and 2) basically a good litmus test to determine which nonwhites are self-aware enough to even be neutral additions to the body politic — but if it had the ability to be popular amongst nonwhites, there would be no need to make it.
https://www.aulis.com/investigation.htm
It will cost them nothing to expose this (now ancient) fraud--and they will enjoy doing it to humiliate "our team" when the time is right.
The white middle class can be rebuilt by outlawing all affirmative action and set asides in college admissions and hiring. The penalties for discrimination against whites should be dire and could include seizing the endowments of universities who engage in the practice and jail time and heavy fines for people at companies still discriminating against whites in hiring and promotions.
It's also time to end free access to white people for blacks and browns and whites should be able to keep non-whites out of their communities if they choose to do so.Replies: @Justvisiting
The retard in Buffalo didn’t murder immigrants. His victims had deep roots in the US; probably deeper than his.
It’s certainly true that the elites are trying to replace and ultimately eliminate whites. Jennifer Rubin alone proves this beyond all doubt. Imagine if a goy cheered the fact that more Jews are dying than being born.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jrubinblogger/status/1425899248269266947?lang=en
Having said this, they’re not trying to replace us with ADOS. They use ADOS as a bioweapon against whites but they don’t want the black population to increase either, hence their nuclear meltdown about SCOTUS actually reading the constitution and ruling based on an honest interpretation of it.
But not in Buffalo. Like all northern cities Buffalo fell victim to the great negro displacement that occurred between the 20's and the 50's. From a geographical standpoint, their migration took them farther than it takes Hondurans and El Salvadorans to reach Mexico, and from an ethic/racial standpoint negroes are much more dissimilar to northeastern US whites than the former groups are to each other. Buffalo's population peaked in the early 1950's and has been declining ever since.
The "blacks have more roots in the US" card only stands up in reference to southern blacks who remain there. Blacks who left the south for the north 70-100 years ago don't get that card to play. At the time the north and the south could have still easily been distinguished as two separate countries.Replies: @Mike Tre
You've just resurrected The Dirty Little Not-So Secret why white libs REALLY back abortion.
The Dems and the GOP switch places as the Generals depending on the issue. When it comes to corporate welfare or Israel worship, the GOP always gets its way (not that the Dems are significantly less extreme on these issues).
Both parties love mass immigration. The GOP loves it for diluting the economic power of the productive class, while the Dems love it for diluting our political power
https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/wbcn2h/no_but_i_am_legitimately_angry_that_nobody_can/
There's a lot of "who ARE these hysterical queens online defending this crap?" A feeling I think many of us have had when the new shitlib narrative comes out. Gay liberals apparently also don't know who these people are or who put them in charge.Replies: @AndrewR, @Mike Tre
The monkeypox epidemic would be over by September if every man-loving man in America vowed to wait two to three weeks in between having unprotected sex with novel partners. But to some very vocal individuals, asking for this extremely minor level of sexual chastity is one step away from homos being thrown off bridges.
It's "specious" I tells ya. And really, really elaborate: Bringing in more client/voters. Complex!
Oh, and in the next breath Democrats boast about changing demographics turning red states purple and eventually blue.Replies: @HammerJack
Nearly all of my friends and family from California have now decamped to other states, mostly Texas and Florida. Every single one of them is crowing about how they’ve registered to vote and are ecstatic at doing their part to turn their new state blue!
Not a shred of recognition about what they’re leaving behind, or why. And I’m not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.
They think tax policy and infrastructure spending will stay the same even with pandering to gays and blacks.
It’s a kind of Magic Dirt theory all on its own.
There simply is no alternative to living in a nation with people who
a) have more-or-less common shared norms
b) are loyal to the nation.
Other people(s) are just a cancer.
“Sulzberger & Slim Blog, which pushed the ‘Hillary will win in a landslide’ conspiracy theory, and then pushed 4 years of ‘Trump-Russia Collusion’ and then traitorously pushed for two false impeachments and pushed a ‘Jan. 6th insurrection’ hoax, suddenly claim the Marxist longtime open and admitted plan to demographically replace whites is a ‘specious conspiracy theory.’”
And yet Steve sites them as a ‘real” news source, like a yutz. Like controlled opposition.
Every time he does, I get closer to cancelling my monthly donation.
But yeah, there's no use pretending that outfit is "the news".
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Living through this, I can see why the South rebelled. And why they intimidated scalawags and carpetbaggers afterwards into leaving afterwards.
The celebration parallax:
They celebrate whatever they want whenever they want, but when we notice something and complain: it’s hate, conspiracy theory, etc
They're at the point where they're saying, "we need to quit talking about Steve Sailer."
Time to go on the pod, Steve! Join Zizek, Alex Jones, Glenn greenwald, Tulsi Gabbard, moldbug, and host of other internet sensations!Replies: @AndrewR
I didn’t know any of them were on Red Scare but I know Bannon was on there
It’s because the party was dominated by the Bush dynasty with its dumb “Hispanics are natural Republicans” idea.
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
You’ve become bolder in your proposed rhetorical tactics. Interesting. Flashback:
Of course, any explicitly pro-White demographic numbers statement will still be called White Nationalist. Your current ‘carrot’ argument makes sense in a semi-sarcastic paternalistic way and repeats the recognized irony of non-Whites wishing to move to “racist” White countries to “improve their lives”. But it won’t convince anti-Whites (here and abroad) who are willing to see Whites taken down a peg or ten.
So far, one huge (paradoxically stabilizing, for now) factor in America is the implicit threat of massive (White) right-wing civilian violence should national events boil over. It is often played by the Right as irony both anonymously online and in some recent spicy political ads (“RINO hunting”), but everyone is aware of the possibility.
Still, the Left keeps tempting fate, like the recent House vote to try to ban “assault weapons”. They’re lucky (for now) that the Senate is there to save them (and the rest of us) from the immediate consequences of a 50% or higher pro-ban vote getting to senile Biden’s desk. The Democrats will have further dodged a bullet if and when the Supreme Court rules “assault weapon” bans unconstitutional.
Where does this leave the mainstream Right at the moment? Non-racial political arguments against immigration coupled with an ongoing ‘egalitarian’ live-and-let-die universally-armed economically segregated Brazilification of the US (low-intensity “mutual combat” coexistence model) will be the likely course until a possible flashover of irreconcilable converging trends that results in hot civil war.
I’m not sure your idea of Brazilification actually describes Brazil. For one thing, it’s not that economically segregated. E.g., I don’t recall paying any fees to go to the beaches in Rio de Janeiro, and I don’t think there’s anything stopping favela-dwellers from going there. Of course, if they caused trouble there, the police would deal with them.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar
We very much are in the “universally armed … low intensity ‘mutual combat’” world. Here’s an anecdote.
My business shares an office building with a Hispanic ad agency. The other day the owner of the agency, a voluptuous brunette, walks into our office and starts talking to the receptionist. The receptionist comes up to me and asks me, the sole Spanish speaker in the office, to help the woman, who had asked for a Spanish speaker. I recognized her as the owner and walked up to her and addressed her in English. Of course she speaks English, but not too well. She asked me to speak to her in Spanish and I told her no, you run a business in this country and we speak English here. It’s hard to be harsh to such a beautiful woman, but I am beyond fed up with these johnny-come-latelies from shithole countries waltzing into my country and demanding we speak their language.
The peech:
They they even use the term "conspiracy theory" proves that they know they are gravely harming Whites. After all, noone has a problem with someone "conspiring" to do them a favor.Replies: @ThreeCranes
Very good.
I really like Masters. But he seems kind of the anti-politician, in that he’s reckless in saying stuff out loud that will be easy to use against him, rather than using the time tested “dog whistle.” He went on Alex Kaschuta’s podcast and didn’t shy away from any of her prompts. I will be really surprised (but happy) if he can win.
My business shares an office building with a Hispanic ad agency. The other day the owner of the agency, a voluptuous brunette, walks into our office and starts talking to the receptionist. The receptionist comes up to me and asks me, the sole Spanish speaker in the office, to help the woman, who had asked for a Spanish speaker. I recognized her as the owner and walked up to her and addressed her in English. Of course she speaks English, but not too well. She asked me to speak to her in Spanish and I told her no, you run a business in this country and we speak English here. It’s hard to be harsh to such a beautiful woman, but I am beyond fed up with these johnny-come-latelies from shithole countries waltzing into my country and demanding we speak their language.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
Sounds like the start of a fiery Spanglish telenovela romance!
The peech:
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
Why? I think you’ve been spending too much time online.
Besides, no immigration policy lever alone can achieve what you’re describing, certainly not within the next decade.
In order to illustrate feminism, we must manspread!
Feminism: We are men!
Incidentally, this could also end the Monkeypox outbreak.
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Because they are unable to grasp the economic consequences of blue social policy.
They think tax policy and infrastructure spending will stay the same even with pandering to gays and blacks.
It’s a kind of Magic Dirt theory all on its own.
https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/wbcn2h/no_but_i_am_legitimately_angry_that_nobody_can/
There's a lot of "who ARE these hysterical queens online defending this crap?" A feeling I think many of us have had when the new shitlib narrative comes out. Gay liberals apparently also don't know who these people are or who put them in charge.Replies: @AndrewR, @Mike Tre
I watched an extended version of That Thing You Do last night as I hadn’t seen it in a good 20 years, and I was shocked to see that even then Super Patriot Tom Hanks was filling his film with heaps of negro worship*, interracial relationships, Homer Simpson-eque white working class dads, and lastly, in a scene that was cut from the final original version, a band manager character played by Tom Hanks that is apparently a homosexual. There is a deleted scene near the end of the movie where Hanks’ pouting lover is waiting to take him to a party, and the homosexual lover is played by none other than hall of fame NFL defensive end Howie Long. I guess his character was a tight end for the movie. The two homosexuals even joke about bringing one of the young male (and drunk) band members along with them to this party (no reference to grooming to see here). At least Hanks makes clear to point out that even in the early 60’s the music industry was run by vulgar jew slobs.
*you’d think that 1964 Los Angeles was 50% black after seeing this movie.
OK, the cook is black. But how do you give a cook as much screentime as the officers? OK, have the cook regularly come up to the bridge to deliver the captain's coffee in person, while offering sagely advice.
It's silly, but by no means the silliest thing in that movie.
It's certainly true that the elites are trying to replace and ultimately eliminate whites. Jennifer Rubin alone proves this beyond all doubt. Imagine if a goy cheered the fact that more Jews are dying than being born.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jrubinblogger/status/1425899248269266947?lang=en
Having said this, they're not trying to replace us with ADOS. They use ADOS as a bioweapon against whites but they don't want the black population to increase either, hence their nuclear meltdown about SCOTUS actually reading the constitution and ruling based on an honest interpretation of it.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Prester John
“The retard in Buffalo didn’t murder immigrants. His victims had deep roots in the US; probably deeper than his. ”
But not in Buffalo. Like all northern cities Buffalo fell victim to the great negro displacement that occurred between the 20’s and the 50’s. From a geographical standpoint, their migration took them farther than it takes Hondurans and El Salvadorans to reach Mexico, and from an ethic/racial standpoint negroes are much more dissimilar to northeastern US whites than the former groups are to each other. Buffalo’s population peaked in the early 1950’s and has been declining ever since.
The “blacks have more roots in the US” card only stands up in reference to southern blacks who remain there. Blacks who left the south for the north 70-100 years ago don’t get that card to play. At the time the north and the south could have still easily been distinguished as two separate countries.
I notice when media organs like the NYT talk about the “great replacement” as conspiracy theory they always bring up the Jewish angle, which makes the theory sound nuttier than it really is.
Personally I don’t think there’s a secret cabal of Jews that are behind open borders; rather it’s the result of neither of the two parties wanting to close the border.
Bringing up the Jewish angle also plays nicely into the theme of MAGA people as borderline Neo-Nazis.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/27/viktor-orban-cpac-conservatives-welcome-racism/
https://archive.ph/P1oJk
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/30/hungarian-prime-minister-viktor-orban-cpac-democracy/
https://archive.ph/A4ESf
https://vdare.com/articles/respectable-right-s-conflicted-reaction-to-orban-shows-white-ethnonationalism-is-coming-to-america
https://twitter.com/vdare/status/1553933992910626817Replies: @MEH 0910
This would mean that over 1.3M are Hispanic. Wonder what percentage of ’em were born in the US.
Right. The response proves it’s intentional. As if chapter 8 of Culture of Critique weren’t enough.
https://archive.ph/P1oJk
https://twitter.com/Milbank/status/1552399849013780481
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/30/hungarian-prime-minister-viktor-orban-cpac-democracy/
https://archive.ph/A4ESfReplies: @Prester John, @MEH 0910
Milbank is about as subtle as a blacksmith. Oh, wait–make that “Blacksmith.”
It's certainly true that the elites are trying to replace and ultimately eliminate whites. Jennifer Rubin alone proves this beyond all doubt. Imagine if a goy cheered the fact that more Jews are dying than being born.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jrubinblogger/status/1425899248269266947?lang=en
Having said this, they're not trying to replace us with ADOS. They use ADOS as a bioweapon against whites but they don't want the black population to increase either, hence their nuclear meltdown about SCOTUS actually reading the constitution and ruling based on an honest interpretation of it.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Prester John
“…hence their nuclear meltdown about SCOTUS actually reading the constitution and ruling based on an honest interpretation of it.”
You’ve just resurrected The Dirty Little Not-So Secret why white libs REALLY back abortion.
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
You have terrible friends and family. Do better.
And yet Steve sites them as a 'real" news source, like a yutz. Like controlled opposition.
Every time he does, I get closer to cancelling my monthly donation.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Achmed E. Newman
He cites the NYT because it’s articles are ACTIONS.
Whether they vote or not (who would trust Democrats in Democratic run governments to police illegals voting?) they surely have shifted the U.S. government to the left by being included in the apportionment.
Taking the recent Yale estimate of the number of illegals resident in the U.S. of 22,000,000 and dividing it by 700,000 (the approximate number of residents per Congressional District) illegals would account for 31.4 Congressional Districts, which exceeds the margin of control of the House in all but extreme outlier election years. By electoral votes, 31 puts “Illegalia” at the third largest U.S. State behind only California and Texas when choosing the President of the United States. Naturally, sanctuary guarantees to illegals draw them into states like California, which augments the political power of deep blue States. This, it should be noted, is the effect if you demur on the issue of illegals themselves voting, and don’t account for the second generation children of illegals voting which obviously trend hard left.
So far, one huge (paradoxically stabilizing, for now) factor in America is the implicit threat of massive (White) right-wing civilian violence should national events boil over. It is often played by the Right as irony both anonymously online and in some recent spicy political ads (“RINO hunting”), but everyone is aware of the possibility.
Still, the Left keeps tempting fate, like the recent House vote to try to ban “assault weapons”. They’re lucky (for now) that the Senate is there to save them (and the rest of us) from the immediate consequences of a 50% or higher pro-ban vote getting to senile Biden’s desk. The Democrats will have further dodged a bullet if and when the Supreme Court rules “assault weapon” bans unconstitutional.
Where does this leave the mainstream Right at the moment? Non-racial political arguments against immigration coupled with an ongoing ‘egalitarian’ live-and-let-die universally-armed economically segregated Brazilification of the US (low-intensity “mutual combat” coexistence model) will be the likely course until a possible flashover of irreconcilable converging trends that results in hot civil war.Replies: @Dave Pinsen
A problem I hadn’t considered with Greenism at the time is that our information guardians can always color new countries green on a new map, kind of like how Wikipedia just changed the definition of “recession” to provide cover for the Biden administration this week.
I’m not sure your idea of Brazilification actually describes Brazil. For one thing, it’s not that economically segregated. E.g., I don’t recall paying any fees to go to the beaches in Rio de Janeiro, and I don’t think there’s anything stopping favela-dwellers from going there. Of course, if they caused trouble there, the police would deal with them.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A6eSp8kKrU
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.I should hope not! Not all of Brazil is the nice parts of Rio, or Ambrosio Bündchenland. I’ve noticed that you often favorably compare countries with major problems (like Russia) to the United States. Could it be a side effect of you being from northern New Jersey? If you lived in a nice part of say, New England, it would be strange to overly romanticize those foreign places.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Dave Pinsen
It has risen to prominence alongside the debunked claims that immigrants living in the United States illegally are voting in elections in large numbers.
New York Times, November 23, 2021 headline:
New York Moves to Allow 800,000 Noncitizens to Vote in Local Elections
The rest is behind the paywall, sorry.)
Look at the bright side. With open borders we get all kinds of fresh vibrancy, like deadly soccer fights. In NYC, 2 futbolers go at it, one picks up a bottle, breaks it like Happy Gilmore and slashes the other guy, who bleeds out.
The victim is Mexican. We know this from Spanish language TV, which unlike gringo media does basic freshman-level reporting about nationality. (U.S. media: “Brooklyn man killed in soccer melee”)
As to the perp, I haven’t been able to track down his nationality, but his surname (Guilcapi) is a very popular Ecuadorean name, so maybe we can assume he’s from there.
So what we have is an Ecuadorean vs Mexican deadly brawl, brought to us by open borders, the construction industry’s shameful outsourcing of labor to third world scabs, and the magic ability of soccer to always bring the world together.
A significant number of Republicans are true believers on immigration. They think it is part of what makes America great and believe all the nonsense about Ellis Islanders building the country. It is a way for them to pat themselves on the back too, they say, “look we took this refugee family in and now the kids are college graduates.” They go hunting for anecdotes to use and completely ignore the 99 problems for every one success story they find.
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
This is a simple and rational argument founded on empirical truths, which means it will only appeal to people (of any race) who already sense that a good life is one lived in accordance with the mores of the American Majority.
Unfortunately, a great many people vote based on their feelings. Even if they intuitively understand the demographic basis for good schools, good neighborhoods, and good nations, and orient their own decisions to be in proximity to these demographics, they don’t want to explicitly admit that they need Whitey, which is what voting for the party of the Stern (White) Dad with a Short-Cropped Haircut Telling You To Clean Up Your Act would be a tacit admission of.
This is compounded by the inferiority complexes which are not only present but actively cultivated in members of the “marginalized classes.” Even if as individuals they are competent and intelligent, or have the capacity to be, racial (or religious, or “sexual” or “gender” minorities) are encouraged to identify themselves with the benighted masses of their cohort and with the pathologies that are rampant amongst them (whether because of racism or something else).
A mulatto professional making six figures may live in New Levittown, with a lightskint schoolteacher wife and even lighter kids who play violin alongside Bao and soccer with Jorge and get taken by Chad to homecoming, but it still gets the blood pumping when he listens to Malcolm X’s speech on white liberals, notwithstanding that these are all his friends and also the party that he ends up voting for.
I am racially a mestizo, but I am more intelligent than 99% of people anyone of any race, and I am several generations removed from Mexico, and neither I nor my parents even speak Spanish. I also pride myself on my objectivity. So I don’t feel offended or personally slighted when, say, Trump says Mexico is sending rapists to America, because it is true, and I have successfully rooted out the inferiority complex instilled in me through my childhood and adolescence by the lugenpresse that would previously have led me to identify with double-digit IQ rapists from a country I’ve never even been to because we both have Spanish last names.
So, to make a long story short, I think this framing is 1) obviously true and 2) basically a good litmus test to determine which nonwhites are self-aware enough to even be neutral additions to the body politic — but if it had the ability to be popular amongst nonwhites, there would be no need to make it.
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
Sigh…That’s just too straightforward, bracingly clear, sensible for a Republican to utter. These creatures – all of them – despite whatever worldly success they have achieved, maneuver through life in a tentative, defensive crouch. They are afraid of the very truth they are convinced of. Sigh….
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Clueless idiots. We would be better off if such types stayed in their blue hellholes and suffered the consequences of their pathetic choices.
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Broken record … but this is why we need separation.
There simply is no alternative to living in a nation with people who
a) have more-or-less common shared norms
b) are loyal to the nation.
Other people(s) are just a cancer.
I’m not sure your idea of Brazilification actually describes Brazil. For one thing, it’s not that economically segregated. E.g., I don’t recall paying any fees to go to the beaches in Rio de Janeiro, and I don’t think there’s anything stopping favela-dwellers from going there. Of course, if they caused trouble there, the police would deal with them.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar
Wikipedia followed up by changing the definition of “definition”. Seriously.
Nah, it won’t unless the writer is specifically referring to the illegal ones or the BOWs (Born Of Wetbacks). But I thought they weren’t voting in large numbers? The (let’s just go all the way back with the terminology) Chicanos whose families have lived here for many generations don’t want squat to do with more illegal immigration. That’s not so say we should pander to a damn one of them either.
About Blake Masters: No doubt, as commenters above have explained, many of the GOP pols feel it’s a better bet to work for their Big Biz illegal-alien employing donors than to work on behalf of their constituents. They know they can throw bones to the latter for a half-year (for Reps.) or a year, even year-and-a-half, and then get back to working on behalf of those donors.
Not all are like this. However, of those, most don’t have the guts it takes to just plain say the obvious truth. Blake Masters took the risk that he would get a barrage of media bullshit and get even his own to disown him. He had the guts it took and won this bet. It helped that Arizona can be pretty Conservative.
Do you all remember Blake Master’s remark about “… frankly, black people” (re: shootings)? It’s so obvious to most of us, but this guy went ahead and said this in a very nice way. We need more guys with guts. They’ve been few and far between.
By sheer dint of having their head on straight in this regard, such people shouldn’t be and don’t need to be “pandered” to. Just say what needs to be said and they will judge it accordingly. For instance, “Hispanic Republicans” are just as aware as white conservatives are that the real problem with illegals is not the illicit nature of the act but the fact that “migrants” are a bunch of Campers of the Saints (that nobody wants to live next to) who are flooding into the country. The “come here legally” thing is equally for purposes of social grace.
I’m not one of these Pollyanna types who thinks that a particularly high number of nonwhites are capable of being real about this, but that’s immaterial. If they don’t get the obvious and gutsy (because it’s obvious) truth, then it’s a waste of time watering down the truth in an attempt to ‘trick’ them into voting Republican or whatever we apparently think the ultimate goal is. Republicans will never be able to out-flagellate Democrats in a hate-Whitey contest.
This is not to say that some diplomacy in racializing political rhetoric is not desirable, since the real reason for such diplomacy is to give Republicans plausible deniability in polite (cuck) society, and nonwhites need it too. My point is that everyone is aware that the Republicans are the default Party of White America, and nonwhites who vote GOP are as acutely aware of this as anyone else.
And yet Steve sites them as a 'real" news source, like a yutz. Like controlled opposition.
Every time he does, I get closer to cancelling my monthly donation.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Achmed E. Newman
It used to annoy me too, Mr. Camara, but I know that the NY Times is his best source of material. It’s not like most of us regular people read those idiots, but many figure that the elite that make a difference do.
But yeah, there’s no use pretending that outfit is “the news”.
Not a shred of recognition about what they're leaving behind, or why. And I'm not sure if this is Democrat logic, or just human nature.Replies: @R.G. Camara, @JR Ewing, @Cloudbuster, @Pete P, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
Those red states need to do a reverse Grapes-of-Wrath type deal and set up road-blocks at the State Line to keep out the Callies.
About Blake Masters: No doubt, as commenters above have explained, many of the GOP pols feel it's a better bet to work for their Big Biz illegal-alien employing donors than to work on behalf of their constituents. They know they can throw bones to the latter for a half-year (for Reps.) or a year, even year-and-a-half, and then get back to working on behalf of those donors.
Not all are like this. However, of those, most don't have the guts it takes to just plain say the obvious truth. Blake Masters took the risk that he would get a barrage of media bullshit and get even his own to disown him. He had the guts it took and won this bet. It helped that Arizona can be pretty Conservative.
Do you all remember Blake Master's remark about "... frankly, black people" (re: shootings)? It's so obvious to most of us, but this guy went ahead and said this in a very nice way. We need more guys with guts. They've been few and far between.Replies: @ADL Pyramid of Hate
The “pandering to minorities” thing, to me, represents such a simple Gordian knot. As I alluded to above, there will be nonwhites who support sensible (even “extreme,” which is to say, extremely sensible) policies and political rhetoric that reaffirm the obvious centrality of the American Majority to the success of the American political project.
By sheer dint of having their head on straight in this regard, such people shouldn’t be and don’t need to be “pandered” to. Just say what needs to be said and they will judge it accordingly. For instance, “Hispanic Republicans” are just as aware as white conservatives are that the real problem with illegals is not the illicit nature of the act but the fact that “migrants” are a bunch of Campers of the Saints (that nobody wants to live next to) who are flooding into the country. The “come here legally” thing is equally for purposes of social grace.
I’m not one of these Pollyanna types who thinks that a particularly high number of nonwhites are capable of being real about this, but that’s immaterial. If they don’t get the obvious and gutsy (because it’s obvious) truth, then it’s a waste of time watering down the truth in an attempt to ‘trick’ them into voting Republican or whatever we apparently think the ultimate goal is. Republicans will never be able to out-flagellate Democrats in a hate-Whitey contest.
This is not to say that some diplomacy in racializing political rhetoric is not desirable, since the real reason for such diplomacy is to give Republicans plausible deniability in polite (cuck) society, and nonwhites need it too. My point is that everyone is aware that the Republicans are the default Party of White America, and nonwhites who vote GOP are as acutely aware of this as anyone else.
Was Blake Masters a military fighter pilot? That seems to be a primary criteria for Arizona Senators.
I’m not sure your idea of Brazilification actually describes Brazil. For one thing, it’s not that economically segregated. E.g., I don’t recall paying any fees to go to the beaches in Rio de Janeiro, and I don’t think there’s anything stopping favela-dwellers from going there. Of course, if they caused trouble there, the police would deal with them.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar
By economically segregated, I mean roughly residentially. Hence favelas vs. non-favelas, or guarded urban fortress block towers. Of course, in public spaces, and mixed neighborhoods (e.g. the movie Neighboring Sounds) there will be everyday friction and low-intensity mutual combat.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.
I should hope not! Not all of Brazil is the nice parts of Rio, or Ambrosio Bündchenland. I’ve noticed that you often favorably compare countries with major problems (like Russia) to the United States. Could it be a side effect of you being from northern New Jersey? If you lived in a nice part of say, New England, it would be strange to overly romanticize those foreign places.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A6eSp8kKrU
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.I should hope not! Not all of Brazil is the nice parts of Rio, or Ambrosio Bündchenland. I’ve noticed that you often favorably compare countries with major problems (like Russia) to the United States. Could it be a side effect of you being from northern New Jersey? If you lived in a nice part of say, New England, it would be strange to overly romanticize those foreign places.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Dave Pinsen
Oops. Meant to blockquote this:
Trump single-handedly put this issue on the table but Steve hates to give crass orange man any credit.Replies: @smetana, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
iSteve has given Ann Coulter credit for broadcasting his eponymous Strategy, and given Trump credit for reading Coulter’s book and running on it.
Coulter even gives a hat tip to iSteve on occasion. When she does, she cheekily calls him “journalist Steve Sailer.”
With a name like that, he should dress like Payne Stewart.
I’m not sure your idea of Brazilification actually describes Brazil. For one thing, it’s not that economically segregated. E.g., I don’t recall paying any fees to go to the beaches in Rio de Janeiro, and I don’t think there’s anything stopping favela-dwellers from going there. Of course, if they caused trouble there, the police would deal with them.
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.Replies: @Ben Tillman, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar
Brazil is admirably monolingual. For a nation her size, astonishingly so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A6eSp8kKrU
In any case, Brazilification probably isn’t an option for us, unfortunately.I should hope not! Not all of Brazil is the nice parts of Rio, or Ambrosio Bündchenland. I’ve noticed that you often favorably compare countries with major problems (like Russia) to the United States. Could it be a side effect of you being from northern New Jersey? If you lived in a nice part of say, New England, it would be strange to overly romanticize those foreign places.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Dave Pinsen
Northern New Jersey is actually pretty nice. I don’t romanticize Russia, but I think they objectively do some things better than us, as I said in that thread (e.g., run a cleaner, more beautiful, and safer subway system in their largest city).
But not in Buffalo. Like all northern cities Buffalo fell victim to the great negro displacement that occurred between the 20's and the 50's. From a geographical standpoint, their migration took them farther than it takes Hondurans and El Salvadorans to reach Mexico, and from an ethic/racial standpoint negroes are much more dissimilar to northeastern US whites than the former groups are to each other. Buffalo's population peaked in the early 1950's and has been declining ever since.
The "blacks have more roots in the US" card only stands up in reference to southern blacks who remain there. Blacks who left the south for the north 70-100 years ago don't get that card to play. At the time the north and the south could have still easily been distinguished as two separate countries.Replies: @Mike Tre
Wow Sailer – leaving two comments in moderation limbo from yesterday. You’ve got issues buddy.
Actually there is: eliminate the “Hispanic” category so the choices are white/black/asian.
Trump single-handedly put this issue on the table but Steve hates to give crass orange man any credit.Replies: @smetana, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
While Trump promised to build a wall and reduce illegal immigration he never promised to reduce legal immigration. Trump did seek to eliminate the diversity visa program in order to allocate these 55,000 green cards to Other qualified immigrants , which would not have reduced legal immigration. Trump claimed his immigration proposal would not reduce immigration. He never advocated for reduced legal immigration.
The media constantly brings this trope that appealing (or pandering) to Latino Americans is somehow opposite, philosophically or politically, to opposing illegal Latino immigration.
It's either that the media treats identity as the sole relevant factor in politics, or it's just a form of gaslighting. Either way, I suspect many legitimate American beaners resent it.Replies: @Bill Jones
You’re right. I’ve seen a bunch of studies showing that Legal Beaners are about as anti illegals as Whites are. It’s a dirty little secret that must not be named.
It's similar to how surveys always find that blacks in the ghetto support the police locking up criminals - with the proviso that individual blacks never consider their own arrested sons/grandsons/husbands/etc. to be 'criminals'. Always they're innocent, framed, entrapped, etc.Replies: @Bill Jones
Well, if we can’t have a plain-speaking politician, we can’t have anything. Here we are, after 60 years of dog-whistles. Oh, yay. A politician who dog-whistles is just somebody who will feel free to utterly forget why he was elected, when he gets in and the shitlibs in Washington start inviting him to cocktail parties.
Quite true, but it doesn’t really matter one way or the other. Whites are justified in resisting replacement whether it is intentional or not. The “conspiracy theory” charge is aimed at obfuscating that fact.
Am I the only one who thinks “Blake Masters” sounds like a porn name?
McCain was a bomber naval aviator, not a fighter pilot who attacks other planes. /pedant
His administration (thanks to Stephen Miller I suppose) nonetheless reduced legal immigration to a 30-year low. Look it up.
Agreed.
This.
Steve Sailer has been making this point for over 2 decades.
They want to bring in their relatives but to keep out everybody else. Just see how “anti-illegal” the typical Mexican is when you start to round up his cousins, nephews, etc.
It’s similar to how surveys always find that blacks in the ghetto support the police locking up criminals – with the proviso that individual blacks never consider their own arrested sons/grandsons/husbands/etc. to be ‘criminals’. Always they’re innocent, framed, entrapped, etc.
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
The NYT etal are just lying in wait on this one….
https://www.aulis.com/investigation.htm
It will cost them nothing to expose this (now ancient) fraud–and they will enjoy doing it to humiliate “our team” when the time is right.
If you go far enough North and/or West it is breathtaking.
Conservatives need way better politicians. Meaning one's who will actually bother to bring up the most obvious attacks against Americans and orient their campaigns--and then their work in office--toward stopping them, toward actually conserving something.
Absolute layups:
-- Democrats loving poor immigrants, because they can give them services and get their votes
-- Democrats--as the state party--love balkanization "diversity" because they then grow their power managing it and bossing people around
-- immigration wage suppression
-- immigration driving up housing prices--making marriage, family and unaffordable; "you can't afford to get married ... thank a Democrat"; "you have no grandchildren? ... thank a Democrat"
-- "Parasite Party"; the Democrats are a coalition of parasites, the unproductive; from the criminals, to the welfare cases, to social service bureaucracy, the to the various useless paper pushers and minders; to their propagandists from academia, news media, NGOs, government, Hollyweird.
-- destroying rule of law;
-- there can only be one set of public norms/laws; if blacks don't want to obey "white" law ... fine; then separate communities/nation
-- "the George Floyd Party"
-- "Democrat crime wave"
-- (more complicated) St. Fauci, the Wuhan lab; time serving bureaucrat able to threaten and bribe scientists to stifle dissent; terrible Covid advice; lockdowns
-- it's a "marriage gap" not a "gender gap"--sure the Democrats do better with emotional appeals to women, but the big thing is they want women to be single and government dependent; women who are married with children get smarter and start to think about the interests of their children, their future
-- "what is a woman", "i am not a biologist"
-- trannies women's sports
-- poisoning girls
-- separation -- basically the "who/whom" of parasitism ... you want to do crazy fine; leave us alone, don't impose your crazy on us; "you need us, we don't need you"
This stuff writes itself. We simply need "conservative" politicians who are willing to fight and actually want to conserve stuff.Replies: @Alden, @Jack P
I’ve tried all those points with White democrat Whites. It really doesn’t work. They just get defensive.
Even; the reason your 35 year old son with a masters in math degree is barely working as a substitute teacher in the nastiest black schools in the district is because he is a White American born man the most discriminated against demographic in America doesn’t change their minds.
Whites got lazy and spoiled and figured that they were high enough on the Maslow hierarchy that they could go for "virtue".
They will have to get stomped all the way down the hierarchy before they will be ready to hear the truth.
Of course by then the USA will be some combination of Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela--with government alternating between right wing military coups and communist insurrections (if it holds together at all).
https://archive.ph/P1oJk
https://twitter.com/Milbank/status/1552399849013780481
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/30/hungarian-prime-minister-viktor-orban-cpac-democracy/
https://archive.ph/A4ESfReplies: @Prester John, @MEH 0910
Washington Watcher II:
https://vdare.com/articles/respectable-right-s-conflicted-reaction-to-orban-shows-white-ethnonationalism-is-coming-to-america
*you'd think that 1964 Los Angeles was 50% black after seeing this movie.
https://youtu.be/pUR5nik2DKUReplies: @Anonymous
When sitting down to watch that Tom Hanks U-boat movie, I immediately wondered “OK, how is Hanks going to insert negroes into a story about WW2 naval officers?”
OK, the cook is black. But how do you give a cook as much screentime as the officers? OK, have the cook regularly come up to the bridge to deliver the captain’s coffee in person, while offering sagely advice.
It’s silly, but by no means the silliest thing in that movie.
Conservatives need way better politicians. Meaning one's who will actually bother to bring up the most obvious attacks against Americans and orient their campaigns--and then their work in office--toward stopping them, toward actually conserving something.
Absolute layups:
-- Democrats loving poor immigrants, because they can give them services and get their votes
-- Democrats--as the state party--love balkanization "diversity" because they then grow their power managing it and bossing people around
-- immigration wage suppression
-- immigration driving up housing prices--making marriage, family and unaffordable; "you can't afford to get married ... thank a Democrat"; "you have no grandchildren? ... thank a Democrat"
-- "Parasite Party"; the Democrats are a coalition of parasites, the unproductive; from the criminals, to the welfare cases, to social service bureaucracy, the to the various useless paper pushers and minders; to their propagandists from academia, news media, NGOs, government, Hollyweird.
-- destroying rule of law;
-- there can only be one set of public norms/laws; if blacks don't want to obey "white" law ... fine; then separate communities/nation
-- "the George Floyd Party"
-- "Democrat crime wave"
-- (more complicated) St. Fauci, the Wuhan lab; time serving bureaucrat able to threaten and bribe scientists to stifle dissent; terrible Covid advice; lockdowns
-- it's a "marriage gap" not a "gender gap"--sure the Democrats do better with emotional appeals to women, but the big thing is they want women to be single and government dependent; women who are married with children get smarter and start to think about the interests of their children, their future
-- "what is a woman", "i am not a biologist"
-- trannies women's sports
-- poisoning girls
-- separation -- basically the "who/whom" of parasitism ... you want to do crazy fine; leave us alone, don't impose your crazy on us; "you need us, we don't need you"
This stuff writes itself. We simply need "conservative" politicians who are willing to fight and actually want to conserve stuff.Replies: @Alden, @Jack P
To me, the crime and the tranny garbage are enough to hammer democrats over the head with.
It's similar to how surveys always find that blacks in the ghetto support the police locking up criminals - with the proviso that individual blacks never consider their own arrested sons/grandsons/husbands/etc. to be 'criminals'. Always they're innocent, framed, entrapped, etc.Replies: @Bill Jones
I did contemplate a “family excepted” line but indolence won out, always a mistake at Unz.
It’s called Pennsylvania.
I had a place in PA 10 miles in from Jersey when I lived in Sodom on Hudson. Those 10 miles made a mental difference.
Even; the reason your 35 year old son with a masters in math degree is barely working as a substitute teacher in the nastiest black schools in the district is because he is a White American born man the most discriminated against demographic in America doesn’t change their minds.Replies: @Justvisiting
Every idea has its moment.
Whites got lazy and spoiled and figured that they were high enough on the Maslow hierarchy that they could go for “virtue”.
They will have to get stomped all the way down the hierarchy before they will be ready to hear the truth.
Of course by then the USA will be some combination of Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela–with government alternating between right wing military coups and communist insurrections (if it holds together at all).
You know, i think this is the first blog post in a very long time..maybe well before the pandemic that Steve Sailer has made on immigration.
And it’s on a politician kind of using a point that is looking a tad stale now. Does anyone still doubt that Hispanic votes are not only gettable for GOP but can be gotten if GOP would only adopt an agenda more in tune with concerns of non wealthy Americans. And by employing the Sailer strategy of nominating the Dems the black party will over time drive Hispanics and Asians into GOP. Democrat strategists are worried!
What if a Blake or a Tucker said something like, “America won WWII, built the world’s largest middle class, and put a man on the moon when it was ~88% white. Today it’s ~56% white, and most Americans don’t think the country’s headed in the right direction. I propose adjusting our immigration policy to bring our white population back up to 75% within the next decade. This will benefit both white and nonwhite Americans.”Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @IHTG, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @Daniel H, @Justvisiting, @KenH
I couldn’t agree more other than would propose to raise the white population percentage to 80% in 15-20 years. This can be done by a near moratorium on immigration and only letting white European immigrants into the nation.
The white middle class can be rebuilt by outlawing all affirmative action and set asides in college admissions and hiring. The penalties for discrimination against whites should be dire and could include seizing the endowments of universities who engage in the practice and jail time and heavy fines for people at companies still discriminating against whites in hiring and promotions.
It’s also time to end free access to white people for blacks and browns and whites should be able to keep non-whites out of their communities if they choose to do so.
This could be done with funds seized from anti-white corporations, universities, government agencies, non-profits etal.
Then I would want states to be allowed to ban blacks and hispanic in migration if they wish to do so--with states permitted to permanently banish residence of any blacks or hispanics convicted of a felony.
The white middle class can be rebuilt by outlawing all affirmative action and set asides in college admissions and hiring. The penalties for discrimination against whites should be dire and could include seizing the endowments of universities who engage in the practice and jail time and heavy fines for people at companies still discriminating against whites in hiring and promotions.
It's also time to end free access to white people for blacks and browns and whites should be able to keep non-whites out of their communities if they choose to do so.Replies: @Justvisiting
Good post–but I would go farther–demand reparations for all white people who have been subjected to affirmative action discrimination and/or family members of white victims of black major crimes.
This could be done with funds seized from anti-white corporations, universities, government agencies, non-profits etal.
Then I would want states to be allowed to ban blacks and hispanic in migration if they wish to do so–with states permitted to permanently banish residence of any blacks or hispanics convicted of a felony.
https://vdare.com/articles/respectable-right-s-conflicted-reaction-to-orban-shows-white-ethnonationalism-is-coming-to-america
https://twitter.com/vdare/status/1553933992910626817Replies: @MEH 0910
https://www.unz.com/article/respectable-rights-conflicted-reaction-to-orban-shows-white-ethnonationalism-is-coming-to-america/