RSS
From the Prime Minister’s Office:
PM Netanyahu’s Remarks at the Start of the Cabinet Meeting
01/03/2018
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, this morning at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting, made the following remarks:
“Every country must guard its borders. Guarding the borders against illegal infiltration is both a right and a fundamental obligation of a sovereign state. To this end, we carried out two good actions.
The first is building fences, the barrier, against the massive infiltration into the country from Africa. This fence, which was erected along the border with Sinai, has prevented – in my estimation – the entry of hundreds of thousands of infiltrators who came from other places, but did not reach Israel. Thanks to this great effort, we have lowered illegal infiltration into Israel to zero.
Now there is another mission. The second mission is to deport the illegal infiltrators who entered Israel prior to the construction of the barrier. This is approximately 60,000 people; we have deported approximately 20,000 and the mission now is to deport the rest. Last year we deported approximately 4,000 and the major effort is to deport most of those who remain, who have infiltrated and are present in Israel illegally. …
Today the Cabinet will approve the plan for deporting the infiltrators from Israel. We will step up enforcement and we will allocate budgets and personnel to implement the plan. I think that it is important that people understand that we are doing something here that is completely legal and completely essential.
The infiltrators have a clear choice – cooperate with us and leave voluntarily, respectably, humanely and legally, or we will have to use other tools at our disposal, which are also according to law. I hope that they will choose to cooperate with us. …
I am pleased that we are getting underway; this problem will be solved. Israel is, in effect, one of the only countries in the world that has succeeded in taking control of this phenomenon, and this has become more vital, and not less, in the restless world in which we live.”
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
A rhetorical resource and template, should anybody need one.
The press blackout is the real story here. Their cousins in the diaspora don’t want us imitating these moves.
Are the Gulf Arab and Iranian state broadcasters covering this? They have a significant amount of nonresident guest workers, so it would be naked hypocrisy.
Why do you fancy Bret Stephens speaks for my vascular surgeon?Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
By the way, the Israeli government is paying them to leave (several thousands dollars per person), so this is hardly a great success story.
It is a story of Israeli incompetence. Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants were allowed to cross the border, were impossible to deport, led to a huge crime and rape wave in certain areas - and finally will cost a fortune to get to return.Replies: @silviosilver
It this were any European or North American country, the New York Times and many other outlets in the mainstream media would have front-page articles denouncing it nearly every day for several months. How can Israel’s sensible policies get through to the western elite’s? Maybe Macron? He seems to have at least flavor-tasted the red pill.
The only 'crime' the Poles have committed is to refuse the imposition of aliens by unelected authority.Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon
However one may feel about Israel, it’s refreshing to read the statement of a leader who puts the interests of his own people first.
We're all Jews now.
I also think Netanyahu is showing himself to be a bit of stand up guy here. I'm guessing the public statement while primarily for domestic consumption was also done as a little pay back to Trump for Jerusalem. Here's a pretty clear statement on borders done by the Prime Minister of the Jewish state. Trump can tweet that sucker out and toss it in the diaspora Jews face when they start their usual "Statue of immigration", "welcoming", "borders==hate", "that's not who we are" shtick. Not that it's going to matter, I've talked to enough Jewish guys from grad school on that it's quite easy for them to have a double standard on nationalism issues specifically for Israel. But it's still some nice ammunition for Trump to use.
Trump staff: Please point out to the big man that he should tweet this out.Replies: @istevefan
What does Netanyahu say about legal immigration? Trump would install a big, beautiful, treasonous door in the middle of the vaporwall.
Keep putting this stuff out there ISteven. People need to know.:)
Is Weinstein-gate spreading to Silicon Valley, or is Weinstein-gate winding down?
from Vanity Fair
Google evidently is getting it's fill of those lately.
And here silly old me thought that there were no perverts in SF, just nice handsome boys who love each other differently. A woman was involved? Do they have those in SF?
Bondage wins.
Maybe we should go back to chaperones and no sex outside of marriage since women appear not to have any agency these days and don't want to be accountable for their actions.
The Israelis and diaspora are good at putting their own interests first. We can learn from them.
We’re all Jews now.
Illegal aliens in the United States on January 20, 2017: 12 million.
Illegal aliens in the United States today: 12 million.
‘Every country must guard its borders’.
A controversial statement if there ever was one.
*NOT* if The Economist magazine has got anything to do with it.
– and we live under the era of government by Economist.
The fucking EU is planning to strip Poland of its ‘voting rights’ (democracy?, what democracy?) for doing far far less.
The only ‘crime’ the Poles have committed is to refuse the imposition of aliens by unelected authority.
See: https://www.ngo-monitor.org/report-category/europe/
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455040/eurocrat-attacks-anti-pluralist-polish-government-hypocriticalReplies: @Eagle Eye, @Lex
This Netanyahu fellow sounds like a racist bigot. Open borders for Israel!
Tear down that wall Mr Netanyahu!
I’ll have what they’re having …
“Afterwards, having accomplished that, I propose we take a second look at the Falasha. Was it a mistake bringing them here? Does anyone really think they’re Jewish like the rest of us? I mean really?”
Rescuing Ethiopian non Jews meant billions in aid for Israel. At one time before the Russian invasion of Afghanistan Jewish publications were breathlessly discovering secret hidden Jews in Afghanistan who needed to be rescued and brought home to their ancient home land.
That rescuing European Jews from the anti Semitic Muslims means stampeding them and their money and skills to Israel. That was the whole purpose of rescuing Russian Jews, money and skills.
Are the Gulf Arab and Iranian state broadcasters covering this? They have a significant amount of nonresident guest workers, so it would be naked hypocrisy.Replies: @Ed, @Art Deco, @Dmitry
The Arab states have no problem deporting Africans and others. Saudi Arabia is deporting thousands of Ethiopians at this very moment.
Saudi Arabia is – supposedly – building a physical barrier on the border with Yemen. THe terrain alone will make this a hideous costly undertaking.
Exactly don’t get the hostility towards Jews on this one. Nothing is preventing American or European leaders from doing the same. Refugee applications have plummeted nearly 90% in Denmark. They said no more and their leaders executed their plan unapologetically. If Germans want to let in millions of migrants. If Italy wants to tug African boats to their territories that’s on them.
British man arrested over Islamophobic tweet
Man arrested for Facebook posts about Syrian refugees in Scotland
German police raid homes over Facebook hate speech
The founder of Germany’s far-right, anti-Islam Pegida movement goes on trial ... on hate speech charges after he called refugees “cattle” and “trash” in a Facebook post
ADL Joins Court Challenge Against Trump’s Muslim Ban
ADL's Role in Fighting Anti-Muslim Bigotry
Local Law Enforcement Chiefs Return from Elite ADL Training in Israel.Replies: @Ed
That's what the argument/discussion is all about. Who's on what side, pushing for what policies.
“Illegal infiltrators” is perfect. If some of our leaders started using the word infiltrators, it would help.
Not too long ago, everyone said illegal immigrants. The left moved to undocumented immigrants. They have been trying to push undocumented citizens. I am not sure what comes after that win. Underdocumented citizen? Preferred citizen?
Here’s a good template for that “peaceful ethnic cleansing.”
Wait a minute, wasn’t the problem that her punishment was too widely known? Or was she there to be the punisher?
Google evidently is getting it’s fill of those lately.
In high school, my English teachers loved to assign “compare and contrast” essays. The contrast between Netanyahu and Merkel could not be more stark. Binny has his strengths and weaknesses, but there’s no doubt that he loves the Jewish people and will take great care to protect them. Merkel’s disdain for Germans and Germany is abundantly clear. Why they have not tossed her out of office is a mystery to me.
In Israel there was a serious hard right party with a paramilitary wing that countered the wave of acid-fueled radical left weirdness and left-wing terrorism of the 1960s-70s.
Israel is the alternate history where the right wing won the 1960s. Many boomers who today gaze longingly at Israeli border policies back then were going to the protests and the concerts and the happenings: tuning in turning on and dropping out.
So thanks a lot guys. This could be us, but u playin
Israel is where it is today because of what happened in the 1990s, not the 1960s-70s. Its Clinton and Blair equivalents failed, big time.
There’s a plausible alternate history where a more competent Israeli liberal left successfully navigates the challenges of the 1990s and Israel is currently swamped with Palestinian and foreign guest workers. Remember, the Russian immigrants didn’t have to turn right. They voted for Rabin in ’92.
Please check a calendar. The oldest boomer was about 20 in the mid-1960s. The youngest was about 6. Some of the older boomers may have been fueling the 1960s counterculture but policy was still largely in the hands of the WWII “Greatest Generation.”
Are the Gulf Arab and Iranian state broadcasters covering this? They have a significant amount of nonresident guest workers, so it would be naked hypocrisy.Replies: @Ed, @Art Deco, @Dmitry
The press blackout is the real story here. Their cousins in the diaspora don’t want us imitating these moves.
Why do you fancy Bret Stephens speaks for my vascular surgeon?
And it's notable that during the Trump meltdown, the speia toned immigration fanaticism has been darn near universal from Jews in the media across the political spectrum. And that's in reaction to Trump's rather ho-hum nods toward national sovreignty. The basic nationalist idea that Netanyahu points to here--that every people have a right to a border to preserve the character of the population in the nation--just sends a fair number of Jews into a fit when applied to white gentile nations.
I find it bizzare that on a HBD blog, where folks can discuss outsized black criminality, or ethnic voting preferences or Asian/white/hispanic/black PISA scores--all statistical--that when someone mentions the--incredibly obvious--Jewish skew on immigration enthusiam or anti-nationalist propagandizing that it's all somehow suspect or they are the dreaded anti-Semite, pretty much responsible for gassing Jews.Replies: @Hanoi Paris Hilton
Feminism makes women stupid, self-destructive, and utterly oblivious to their spoiled brat hypocrisy.
“The infiltrators have a clear choice – cooperate with us and leave voluntarily, respectably, humanely and legally, or we will have to use other tools at our disposal, which are also according to law.
This brings media to the current controversy over so-called “dreamers” and what to do with them. “They were brought here as children through no fault of their own!” “America is the only country they know!” “We have no humane choice but to at least allow this cop of illegals stay”
An alternate proposal that would still (maybe) be palatable to the soft hearted soccer mom types vulnerable to the emotion-based arguments given above would be to simply grant these “dreamers” a 6 month grace period to get their stuff in order and a complimentary one-way plane ticked back to their country of origin with the possibility of re-entry (but in no way guarantee) through a new Merit based immigration system Trump keeps promising us. Even throw these ‘dreamers’ some cash for their cooperation in their self-removal too (as Israel does!).
Illegal aliens in the United States today: 12 million.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @istevefan, @Buck Turgidson
The 12 million illegals number has been around for about 15 years now. It’s complete BS. 60 million people in this country speak a language other than English at home. That’s 1 in 5.
So, what does your vascular surgeon think about immigration? Have you asked him? Jews vote Democratic at a rate of 70%. And even most Republican Jews seem to be pretty soft on immigration.
Unchallenged spokesmen ARE spokesmen, by default.
You, however, are not a spokesman. You are a prating nobody, and nobody wants to listen to you.
Netanyahu doesn’t want to admit the wrong kind of Jews into Israel, but thinks that America may not ban muslims from entering America.
Netanyahu rejects Trump’s proposal to ban Muslims from entering U.S.
The very language involved is kind of funny. Netanyahu “rejects” banning muslims from entering the U.S. Rejects? Does he get a vote? Is there an additional branch of government in our federal system that I am unaware of?
“a bondage club in San Francisco”
And here silly old me thought that there were no perverts in SF, just nice handsome boys who love each other differently. A woman was involved? Do they have those in SF?
Bondage wins.
Netanyahu condemns Trump’s Muslim ban
Com’on Ava, who doesn’t like a woman who is open and accepting. Put your big girl panties back on.
Israel Has Built Walls, Fences And Other Barriers To Prevent Illegal Infiltration.
Netanyahu Defends Israel.
Treasonous Rat Politicians In The United States Push Mass Immigration Infiltration
Treasonous Rat Politicians In The United States Aid And Abet Illegal Alien Infiltration
“Every country must guard its borders. Guarding the borders against illegal infiltration is both a right and a fundamental obligation of a sovereign state. ”
Psst! Pass the word.
What does Ivanka think of this policy?
Nothing stopping anyone except laws and men with guns.
Speaking in Berlin, Facebook boss calls Germany’s handling of European refugee crisis ‘inspiring’ and says site must do more to tackle anti-migrant hate speech
British man arrested over Islamophobic tweet
Man arrested for Facebook posts about Syrian refugees in Scotland
German police raid homes over Facebook hate speech
The founder of Germany’s far-right, anti-Islam Pegida movement goes on trial … on hate speech charges after he called refugees “cattle” and “trash” in a Facebook post
ADL Joins Court Challenge Against Trump’s Muslim Ban
ADL’s Role in Fighting Anti-Muslim Bigotry
Local Law Enforcement Chiefs Return from Elite ADL Training in Israel.
Belgium recently deported about 10 or so migrants to Sudan. For some reason these deportees were abused in the Sudan. Now Belgium has not only halted further deportations to Sudan but is making arrangements to bring the ones they deported back.
No one is forcing this level of stupidity. The British people voted to leave the EU in large part because of immigration. It maybe too late but they are trying.Replies: @IHTG, @J.Ross
I detect zero hostility toward Israeli Jews. Diaspora Jews, OTOH, deserve such hostility from their host nations for their support of open borders and ethnic dilution of those host nations’ polities/populations.
No hostility — jealousy and admiration. But hostility for the US and European elites (with a large component of US and European Jews) pushing the opposite policies and forcing the local populace, against the popular will, to accept effectively open borders.
Illegal aliens in the United States today: 12 million.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @istevefan, @Buck Turgidson
Your sentiment is correct,but the numbers are probably way off. That 12 million figure has been used for years. The true number is probably twice that amount.
Why do you fancy Bret Stephens speaks for my vascular surgeon?Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
I don’t. But i’m aware that if your vascular surgeon is Jewish it is considerly more likely that Brett Stephens speaks for him than if he’s a gentile. Just like it’s considerably more likely that the black guy up the street in the hoodie is trouble, than the white guy in the hoodie–even though most black guys are not criminals doing nasty violent stuff. Statistics.
And it’s notable that during the Trump meltdown, the speia toned immigration fanaticism has been darn near universal from Jews in the media across the political spectrum. And that’s in reaction to Trump’s rather ho-hum nods toward national sovreignty. The basic nationalist idea that Netanyahu points to here–that every people have a right to a border to preserve the character of the population in the nation–just sends a fair number of Jews into a fit when applied to white gentile nations.
I find it bizzare that on a HBD blog, where folks can discuss outsized black criminality, or ethnic voting preferences or Asian/white/hispanic/black PISA scores–all statistical–that when someone mentions the–incredibly obvious–Jewish skew on immigration enthusiam or anti-nationalist propagandizing that it’s all somehow suspect or they are the dreaded anti-Semite, pretty much responsible for gassing Jews.
Huh? Nothing is *preventing* other than the political forces–ideological, propaganda, financial–arrayed one way or another.
That’s what the argument/discussion is all about. Who’s on what side, pushing for what policies.
If you don’t want people to think you are into fetish play and such, then don’t go to orgies with people in your own town and industry.
Maybe we should go back to chaperones and no sex outside of marriage since women appear not to have any agency these days and don’t want to be accountable for their actions.
Agreed. Netanyahu is actually a leader who understands where his core obligation lies. (I wish he wasn’t shilling for war with Iran–for us to be in a war with Iran. Iranian nukes landing in Tel Aviv is something Israel ought to be able to deter very easily by itself. I think he’s misreading the plus/minus on handling that. But it’s clear he takes his responsibilities seriously and puts Israelis’ interests first.)
I also think Netanyahu is showing himself to be a bit of stand up guy here. I’m guessing the public statement while primarily for domestic consumption was also done as a little pay back to Trump for Jerusalem. Here’s a pretty clear statement on borders done by the Prime Minister of the Jewish state. Trump can tweet that sucker out and toss it in the diaspora Jews face when they start their usual “Statue of immigration”, “welcoming”, “borders==hate”, “that’s not who we are” shtick. Not that it’s going to matter, I’ve talked to enough Jewish guys from grad school on that it’s quite easy for them to have a double standard on nationalism issues specifically for Israel. But it’s still some nice ammunition for Trump to use.
Trump staff: Please point out to the big man that he should tweet this out.
Given this, if Jews were to become immigration hawks, ala Stephen Miller, they could forever endear themselves to most Americans.
But would they do this?
What the hell was Ava doing at a bondage club in the first place? She makes it sound like she “ran into” him in the produce section at Safeway.
I am assuming that the children born in Israel of illegal alien parents don’t get automatic citizenship as in the US. We really need to change that birthright citizenship rule as other countries have done.
The New York Times spends every week obsessively criticizing Israel. Have you never read the New York Times.
Likewise most European newspapers.
The only 'crime' the Poles have committed is to refuse the imposition of aliens by unelected authority.Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon
The EU funds all the pro-immigration groups in Israel, as well as all the anti-Israel propaganda groups.
See: https://www.ngo-monitor.org/report-category/europe/
Are the Gulf Arab and Iranian state broadcasters covering this? They have a significant amount of nonresident guest workers, so it would be naked hypocrisy.Replies: @Ed, @Art Deco, @Dmitry
No it’s not. This story (about the 40,000 illegal immigrants in Israel, who have not deported for many years) has been covered endlessly over the years.
By the way, the Israeli government is paying them to leave (several thousands dollars per person), so this is hardly a great success story.
It is a story of Israeli incompetence. Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants were allowed to cross the border, were impossible to deport, led to a huge crime and rape wave in certain areas – and finally will cost a fortune to get to return.
The left is disproportionately powerful in Israel. The Israeli media and judiciary is extremely left-wing on issues like this. And they receive a lot of foreign funding as well. The left in Israel increasingly lack popular support though, due to the changing population make-up in Israel (which has large numbers of religious people, Middle Easterners and emigrants from the USSR->FSU).
I also think Netanyahu is showing himself to be a bit of stand up guy here. I'm guessing the public statement while primarily for domestic consumption was also done as a little pay back to Trump for Jerusalem. Here's a pretty clear statement on borders done by the Prime Minister of the Jewish state. Trump can tweet that sucker out and toss it in the diaspora Jews face when they start their usual "Statue of immigration", "welcoming", "borders==hate", "that's not who we are" shtick. Not that it's going to matter, I've talked to enough Jewish guys from grad school on that it's quite easy for them to have a double standard on nationalism issues specifically for Israel. But it's still some nice ammunition for Trump to use.
Trump staff: Please point out to the big man that he should tweet this out.Replies: @istevefan
I think Jews really have an opportunity to co-opt the immigration debate that would forever endear them to most Americans. Though Jews have been one of the groups that has pushed strongest for mass immigration, most Americans are either unaware or afraid to voice this. For example, Ann Coulter, clearly a smart person, appears to believe Teddy Kennedy was the author of the 1965 Immigration Act. In fact Rush Limbaugh, another high IQ guy, just blamed Teddy on the radio today for the 65 act.
Given this, if Jews were to become immigration hawks, ala Stephen Miller, they could forever endear themselves to most Americans.
But would they do this?
Bring-em Young approved the granting of the vote to Utah women in 1870.
2015 — Netanyahu “rejects” banning Muslims from entering the U.S.
Rejects? Does he get a vote? Is there an additional branch of government in our federal system that I am unaware of?
Here is video from December 5, 2015, in which I state that we should be accepting no Muslim refugees into the United States. Relevant portion starts at 1:27 in video:
http://www.wmur.com/article/syrian-refugee-rally/5086314
Trump called for Muslim travel ban on December 7, 2015:
https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/07/donald-trump-calls-for-banning-muslims-from-entering-u-s/
New Hampshire is under attack from REFUGEE OVERLOAD. The treasonous rats in the American Empire’s ruling class are using the refugee program as a demographic weapon to destroy the European Christian ancestral core of the USA.
And it's notable that during the Trump meltdown, the speia toned immigration fanaticism has been darn near universal from Jews in the media across the political spectrum. And that's in reaction to Trump's rather ho-hum nods toward national sovreignty. The basic nationalist idea that Netanyahu points to here--that every people have a right to a border to preserve the character of the population in the nation--just sends a fair number of Jews into a fit when applied to white gentile nations.
I find it bizzare that on a HBD blog, where folks can discuss outsized black criminality, or ethnic voting preferences or Asian/white/hispanic/black PISA scores--all statistical--that when someone mentions the--incredibly obvious--Jewish skew on immigration enthusiam or anti-nationalist propagandizing that it's all somehow suspect or they are the dreaded anti-Semite, pretty much responsible for gassing Jews.Replies: @Hanoi Paris Hilton
Mister Roissy, over at Chateau Heartiste —not known for luv luv luvvin’ dem Jooooos— posted an exit poll from the 2016 general that showed 58.8% of married, penilo-American, self-identified Jooooos having voted for Trump. Wow! If this is a valid survey, maybe it’s time to back off a bit on the “Die Juden sind unser Ungluck!” crapola. But then again, Roissy himself sure hasn’t backed off.
Between the degeneracy and the female solipsism, that article is an absolute lulz mine.
What would “backing off” look like? David Brooks chatting with Bill Kristol about how immigration is Who We Are?
Trump hasn’t exactly been bad for the Jews.
Linked piece in The Hill does NOT bear out the screaming headline.
Netanyahu’s statement was anodyne boilerplate and never mentioned U.S. immigration policies:
As the Prime Minister of a country with a significant proportion of Muslim citizens (in Israel proper, not West Bank/Gaza), Netanyahu could hardly say anything else.
The New York Times criticizes Israel every week? I read it every day. The New York Times has at least 100 articles implicitly or explicitly pushing free borders on European countries and the USA per one article meekly criticizing Israel, using their indoors voice. Netanyahu’s statement will not be considered “fit to print” since it does not fit the New York Times narrative, and will not appear at all. If a European or USA political figure had uttered the exact same words, it would be on the front page for a month, every day, with the New York Times calling the speaker a hateful madman and characterizing him as the living embodiment of everything evil.
The only 'crime' the Poles have committed is to refuse the imposition of aliens by unelected authority.Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon
Remarkably sensible piece in NRO
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455040/eurocrat-attacks-anti-pluralist-polish-government-hypocritical
became the new aim of the Western Deep State elites in the 1990s.
British man arrested over Islamophobic tweet
Man arrested for Facebook posts about Syrian refugees in Scotland
German police raid homes over Facebook hate speech
The founder of Germany’s far-right, anti-Islam Pegida movement goes on trial ... on hate speech charges after he called refugees “cattle” and “trash” in a Facebook post
ADL Joins Court Challenge Against Trump’s Muslim Ban
ADL's Role in Fighting Anti-Muslim Bigotry
Local Law Enforcement Chiefs Return from Elite ADL Training in Israel.Replies: @Ed
The French chopped the head off of a king. Fidel landed on Cuba with what a dozen men or so.
Belgium recently deported about 10 or so migrants to Sudan. For some reason these deportees were abused in the Sudan. Now Belgium has not only halted further deportations to Sudan but is making arrangements to bring the ones they deported back.
No one is forcing this level of stupidity. The British people voted to leave the EU in large part because of immigration. It maybe too late but they are trying.
Belgium recently deported about 10 or so migrants to Sudan. For some reason these deportees were abused in the Sudan. Now Belgium has not only halted further deportations to Sudan but is making arrangements to bring the ones they deported back.
No one is forcing this level of stupidity. The British people voted to leave the EU in large part because of immigration. It maybe too late but they are trying.Replies: @IHTG, @J.Ross
Yup.
No Jew forces Lindsey Graham to love immigration. Nor John McCain, nor Jeff Flake, nor Thom Tillis. Trump is president, they’ve been presented with a viable option, and they’re rejecting it.
It’s you, whitey. You were the bad guy all along.
And, actually, when it comes to Lindsey Graham, I don't think that blackmail can be ruled out.
By the way, the Israeli government is paying them to leave (several thousands dollars per person), so this is hardly a great success story.
It is a story of Israeli incompetence. Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants were allowed to cross the border, were impossible to deport, led to a huge crime and rape wave in certain areas - and finally will cost a fortune to get to return.Replies: @silviosilver
Lol, get real. A few thousand dollars is a bargain basement price.
Well, except for Jewish power. Gobs of money and tons of influence. Dave Gelbaum bribed the Sierra Club with a hundred million dollars.
Frankly, Ed, this conversation might be too complicated for you to “get.” Maybe Steve should put a box of crayons in the lobby.
I dunno about Germany or Denmark or Italy, but here in the USA, if we want to halt or reverse the immigration disaster, we’re gonna have to do it over Jewry’s prostrate (political) corpse.
Would you plz ask your vascular surgeon if white bread on mayo (and, consequently, you as well) is kosher?
Rabbi, why must America take refugees?
Because America is land of immigrants.
Rabbi, why doesn’t Israel have to take refugees?
Why are you antisemitic?
I was thinking the same thing when I read it, in a general sense (i.e., I didn’t think Trump and tweets).
The key is to have the conversation with the Jewish guy LOUDLY, in front of lots and lots of GOYIM. Then the Jew can go on about his business, unmoved by regard for anyone but Jews, as usual, and still have served our purposes.
Nonsense.
No it isn’t. The left in Israel is actually curiously shriveled and powerless, in the proper context (i.e., the context of global Jewry being very left wing, pro-immigration, anti-borders, etc.). Don’t pretend the Jewish majority doesn’t live in the diaspora. And don’t pretend that isn’t where the vast majority of Jewish political and financial power resides.
If we 1. trusted the data and 2. could deport all the Jews who don’t share all of those qualifiers, sure. Truth is exit polls say Jews voted 72% for Hillary and 75% against Trump.
Jews use massive carrots and sticks to force this level of compliance with their wishes. Reconstructing this tendentiously to “no one is literally forcing” doesn’t make Jewish influence any less real, or any less malignant.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455040/eurocrat-attacks-anti-pluralist-polish-government-hypocriticalReplies: @Eagle Eye, @Lex
In short, Poland dares stand in the way of imposing the NWO billionaire totalitarian dystopia that
became the new aim of the Western Deep State elites in the 1990s.
Belgium recently deported about 10 or so migrants to Sudan. For some reason these deportees were abused in the Sudan. Now Belgium has not only halted further deportations to Sudan but is making arrangements to bring the ones they deported back.
No one is forcing this level of stupidity. The British people voted to leave the EU in large part because of immigration. It maybe too late but they are trying.Replies: @IHTG, @J.Ross
No one is asking for this “stupidity” either, and Theresa May’s government is doing everything it can to “accidentally” fumble Brexit. The fact that your examples are massively bloody revolutions should bother you more than it should convince anyone else.
Jews are completely innocent, and they always will be. We know.
Jews give Graham the carrots (bribes, PR, networking) and sticks (threats) as much as anyone. And McCain, and Flake, and Tillis…
Why do you fancy Bret Stephens speaks for my vascular surgeon?Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mr. Anon
So, what does your vascular surgeon think about immigration? Have you asked him? Jews vote Democratic at a rate of about 70%. And even most Republican Jews seem to be pretty soft on immigration. When 70% of a group votes for the party that promises ever increasing immigration, one may reasonably conclude that that group tends to support ever increasing immigration.
Unchallenged spokesmen may become spokesmen, by default.
You, however, are not a spokesman. You are a prating nobody, and nobody wants to listen to you.
Perhaps not, but they induce many candidates to love immigration through campaign donations.
And, actually, when it comes to Lindsey Graham, I don’t think that blackmail can be ruled out.
No, Read his statement. He said he “rejected” Trump’s proposal. What business does the PM of Israel have rejecting a domestic policy proposal put forth by an American presidential candidate? What business does he have voicing an opinion on it at all?
How come the US can’t have a President who talks like that in cabinet meetings and actually acts on his rhetoric? By acting on his policies, illegals then get the memo that the nation’s leader means what he says.
I think it is from one of your posts I learned of the concept of bringing in immigrants to oppress your own citizens such as in Bahrain where the Sunni minority gives citizenship to Sunni immigrants from Pakistan to control the local Shiite majority.
It seems the Tutsis of Rwanda have the same idea and figured they need help against the Hutus majority by bringing in their ancient cousins from East Africa-Sudan and Eritrea.
You LIE.
The Hill’s statement claiming that Netanyahu “rejected” Trump’s policies is an intentional MISREPRESENTATION of what Nethanyahu’s ACTUALLY said.
In other words, The Hill is once again caught in its “abandoned prostitution to falsehood,” in Thomas Jefferson’s phrase.
Netanyahu has absolutely no reason to criticize Trump, and many reasons not to. As I pointed out, writing slowly so you can follow, is that Netanyahu put out a typical anodyne political statement to get past the issue:
So far, so boring.
Only a paid troll could claim to believe that Netanyahu had criticized Trump when to do so would be not only against Israel’s interests but also psychologically bizarre. There is no earthly reason why Netanyahu would criticize the U.S. over a matter that does not directly concern Israel.
Again, you swallowed The Hill’s lie whole. Hope you like the taste.
Based on your extensive misrepresentation of my post and others, I can only conclude that you are not only a liar, but a stupid liar.Replies: @Eagle Eye
Not “his [Netanyahu’s] statement” but The Hill’s lie.
The Hill lied to its readers (surprise, surprise, narrative maintenance and development now being the real business of most media outlets).
You are intentionally reiterating The Hill’s lie after having been alerted to it.
Liar.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455040/eurocrat-attacks-anti-pluralist-polish-government-hypocriticalReplies: @Eagle Eye, @Lex
It was also revealed that Civic Platform’s leader and PM for 7 years Donald Tusk(currently President of the European Council) was financed by Germany in the 90s in his political endeavours. It was confirmed by his former party colleagues Paweł Piskorski and Andrzej Olechowski.
No, liar, I did not lie.
According to the Times of Israel:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-rejects-trumps-comments-on-muslims-but-will-still-meet-him/
Indeed, the same piece cites an Israeli MK (Member of the Knesset) who criticized Netanyahu's de facto endorsement of President Trump's policy (as she sees it):Replies: @Mr. Anon
You are intentionally reiterating your first lie.
Liar.
Or somebody who pays attention to the news. Trump clearly DID criticize Trump.
Based on your extensive misrepresentation of my post and others, I can only conclude that you are not only a liar, but a stupid liar.
New York Times has got a very strong anti-Israel agenda, which can be seen by anyone with any objectivity. They don’t much like Israel, and they go out of their way to discredit it, subtly or otherwise.
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=35
As for Israel’s illegal immigration woes.
The illegal immigrants came to Israel up to a decade ago as illegal, economic migrants. They create a crime and rape-wave in the areas they settled. The Israeli government was unable to deport a single one, due to the blockage in the Supreme Court (meanwhile the EU deports 70% of their illegal immigrants).
There is now the immediate possibly that 10,000 of them (out of 40,000), will leave to Rwanda (being paid several thousand dollars each for the privilege), which we will believe when we see it. Netanyahu has made various promises over the years on this situation, but the only one he has implemented was the construction of the fence on the border with Egypt.
What a completely unforeseeable surprise. Now we can have more pearl-clutching about how Law and Justice is “violating the constitution” in trying to clean up Civic Platform’s violations, which are largely unreported in the West.
Again, contrary to your claims, the Times of Israel piece nowhere says that Netanyahu criticized Trump’s policies.
Indeed, the same piece cites an Israeli MK (Member of the Knesset) who criticized Netanyahu’s de facto endorsement of President Trump’s policy (as she sees it):
Based on your extensive misrepresentation of my post and others, I can only conclude that you are not only a liar, but a stupid liar.Replies: @Eagle Eye
Public self-criticism had not heretofore been known as a customary habits of our Commander-in-Chief.
Liar.
I guess that the rating of the New York Times as anti-Israel or pro-Israel is subjective. The New York Times is very easy on Israel compared to how the paper treats North American or European politicians/governments when they suggest imposing protected borders and control of illegal immigration. Israel has actually implemented strict, successful border controls, which are virtually unknown these days throughout Europe and North America (with perhaps a few minor exceptions like Hungary). I only wish that the New York Times would report on Farage, Le Pen and Wilders with the same softly-softly criticism it applies to Israeli politicians in government, who have succeeded in applying their same political philosophy.
Israel is a beacon of hope in terms of immigration control. Meanwhile, many Jews in Europe and North American are notable among the bad guys, working to destroy those countries through uncontrolled immigration.
Illegal aliens in the United States today: 12 million.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @istevefan, @Buck Turgidson
I am going with 35-40 million
Nonsense. Jews’ complaining about American media is always princess and the pea stuff. Jews’ frequent claims along these lines are good for sussing out just how spoiled and blinkered they are, though.
Typo. I meant Netanyahu clearly criticized Trump. Which he did.
Liar.
Indeed, the same piece cites an Israeli MK (Member of the Knesset) who criticized Netanyahu's de facto endorsement of President Trump's policy (as she sees it):Replies: @Mr. Anon
You are lying. It said that Netanyahu rejected Trump’s proposal to ban muslims.
What the F**k do you think “rejected” means? Is not rejecting a policy a form of criticizing it?
Liar.
When intelligent, rational people open their minds to human biodiversity, it gives a fruitful perspective on a whole range of social phenomena. Why should Jews of all people be so keen on open borders, potentially destroying the quality of life in the western societies in which they (and their children) live? How do they square that with their unshakeable support for Israel, one of the few examples of a mostly-western society with extremely strong border controls and a powerful nationalist movement in control of the popular media and government? Is there an HBD explanation for this odd and logically inconsistent behaviour? Will it change if the popular consensus gets to grip with the hypocrisy of the mainstream Jewish approach? It is destructive to western societies, except Israel, which is hypocritically allowed to be exempt.
Peter, on the chance that your question isn’t rhetorical: because it’s good for the Jews, AKA, Jewish Supremacy. The two different strategies (diaspora, Israel) are both offshoots of a single strategy; advance the interests of the Jewish people. Different theaters, different strategies.
I still do not completely understand why mainstream Jews see open borders as in the Jewish interest. Take an upper middle class European (French, British, etc.) or American Jewish family. The family has no interest in emigrating to Israel. Why do they see open borders as a Jewish interest? Seems odd to me. Closed borders for Israel is absolutely logical, but contrarily open borders for the US and western Europe? Could Jews be persuaded to back off from pushing so hard for this ridiculous policy? Unless they are low-wage employers, for whom it does raise short-term profits.
This logic doesn't apply to Israel for the obvious reason that the Israeli government is run by Jews and therefore will never close its borders to Jews, even as it excludes Muslims and other troublesome gentiles.
What makes you think border restrictions won’t someday be extended from Muslims to Jews? Contrary to the conspiracy theories, Jews don’t actually control the U.S. or other Western governments, and if those governments ever become openly anti-Semitic, laws restricting Muslim movements will be quickly applied to Jews as well. No restrictions for anyone is the Jewish interest.
This logic doesn’t apply to Israel for the obvious reason that the Israeli government is run by Jews and therefore will never close its borders to Jews, even as it excludes Muslims and other troublesome gentiles.
Because most people don’t even think along these lines – except right-wing nationalists.
I don’t know that they do. Jews pass most of their BS through a ton of filters, so it comes out on the other side looking very different. The trick is to compartmentalize everything to mask the contradictions, and never think critically. E.g., most of their open-borders stuff is masked with “there but for the grace of G-d go I” BS. “We were wanderers in the desert,” “we were refugees from Germany,” bla bla bla. Then when they touch down in Tel Aviv there’s a whole new set of culturally-conditioned filters to justify doing the opposite and keeping Israel’s Jewish character. The key, again, is not to do self-review; spend that time looking outward at the imagined goyische boogeymen. Oh, and people who are critical of the Jews? Anti-semites. The rationalization hamster is spinning 24/7; one is reminded of the saying about how a man who profits from not noticing tends not to notice – I doubt he often thinks about how steadfast he is in his not noticing.
But yes, it’s odd to people constitutionally capable of ethnic self-review.
FIFY.
We learned it by watching you. We don’t have the advantage of having an entire culture of rationalization, so we have to be explicit about it.
UN Human Rights Council now criticising Israel – demanding that some of the illegal immigrants be sent to Europe.
http://newsru.co.il/israel/09jan2018/israel_un_africa_004.html
The Falashas was just a big scam by Israel, AIPAC and the rest of the lobby to gauge more money out of their gullible American Jewish donors and the American taxpayer.
Rescuing Ethiopian non Jews meant billions in aid for Israel. At one time before the Russian invasion of Afghanistan Jewish publications were breathlessly discovering secret hidden Jews in Afghanistan who needed to be rescued and brought home to their ancient home land.
That rescuing European Jews from the anti Semitic Muslims means stampeding them and their money and skills to Israel. That was the whole purpose of rescuing Russian Jews, money and skills.
Didn’t Hitler say that about Jews?
Why do they want open borders? Because they want to adulterate the Euro (white) populations so much that they-whites- can “never again” form a forceful power bloc, which Jews imagine would then redound badly toward themselves, as in Germany 1933-1945. Never mind the death-grip they had on German media, academia, etc.