The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Mohamed Mohamed and Ali Abbari Don't Stab Canadians, Knives Do

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the Indo-Canadian Voice:

Mohamed Mohamed, 26, and Ali Abbari, 21, charged in relation to Sunday’s stabbing incident in Ottawa

THE Ottawa Police Service Central District Investigations on Monday charged Mohamed Mohamed, 26, and Ali Abbari, 21, both of Ottawa, in relation to the stabbing incident on William Street on Sunday morning.

Both men have been charged with four counts of aggravated assault, four counts of assault with a weapon and three counts of fail to comply.

A third male suspect was released without charges.

The Ottawa Police Service responded to two separate stabbing incidents which occurred in the ByWard market overnight. Investigators are looking for the public’s assistance.

The first incident occurred on Saturday at 10 p.m. at Waller Street and Rideau Street. One male victim was stabbed and sustained non-life-threatening injuries. He was treated and released from hospital. An unidentified suspect, described as a white male in his mid 20’s fled the scene.

The second incident occurred on Sunday at 1:42 a.m. on William Street between York Street and George Street. Five male victims were injured, four of them stabbed. All victims have since been treated. Their injuries are non-life-threatening.

Three suspects were taken into custody on Sunday. The suspects are not known to the victims.

Canadians must be disarmed of all those dangerous dangerous knives. Knife Control Now!

 
Hide 65 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It looks like they made the cut.

  2. Canadians must be disarmed of all those dangerous dangerous knives. Knife Control Now!

    Brits are there already, and there are swingeing imprisonment penalties for having even a tiny one in, say, the trunk of a vehicle, unless you can convince the magistrates it’s essential for your trade. No step is too extreme in Making Safe The Public.
    Although it’s a right pain in the arse having to roast a whole cow every time you want a sandwich.

    • Replies: @Jay Igaboo
    @Expletive Deleted

    Correct.
    I'm Scottish AND British and here in Scotland the ultra-Left SNP that runs the devolved Scottish Government tried to legislate an automatic nine month jail sentence for anyone in possession of a knife with a blade length of over 3 and 1/2 inches outside the confines of their home ( or workplace IF it was a tool of their trade. No defence, and no mitigations allowed.
    Thankfully, the justiciary have refused to cooperate with the SNP's attacks on Common Law and have headed of some of these Stalinest loons worst excesses.
    I've been an outdoorsman since infancy( or for pedants out there I guess I was an outdoorsinfant, outdoorsboy, etc to coin some ridiculous words) and I carry a knife of some description almost all the time, usually a Swiss Army Huntsmanr, which I find invaluable whether I'm working on my car, gardening, our in the woods or hills- you name it, it's useful.
    Because they are so useful, I have four of them, two Huntsmans and two with a 4" lockblade( plus a great sawblade, can opener, etc.
    I gave one to my oldest son when he was 16 ten years ago-- he gave it back to me when the SNP announced their planned legislation as he didn't want arrested and given a police record that would damn him in many ways.
    A couple of years back I had been in the woods , miles from anyone for a couple of days, sleeping out in a bivi bag with a few other items of equipment, including a sheath knife for constructing a shelter that was , as they are designed to, on my belt.
    I had got so used to it I has forgotten I was wearing it, and after I'd walked to the road to drive home, I stopped off at a supermarket STILL unaware that I had it on.
    When I realised I still had it, I was out of there in a flash before I was in the jail.
    Most Britons today have zero understanding of why a population should have a right to bear arms, and most have very little understanding of the two most precious gifts any politicians in history have given to their people--the 1st and 2nd Amendments gifted to Americans by those Dead White Males, The Founding Fathers.

    ( The most recent SNP Nazism is a clampdown on airgun ownership-- the maximum power is 12 ft/lbs, which gives a muzzle velocity of 660f/ps with a very short .22 pellet. I have to spend £86 per gun on licencing them and registering them with the police. When I was a kid, before we were a multi-kulti police state, kids could walk about with an air gun or a sheath knife and nobody cared as long as they were careful. Boy Scouts actually wore a sheath knife as part of their uniform, a knife that would get then canned and counselled about how violently patriarchal their crime was!

    Replies: @RonaldB

  3. “Mohamed Mohamed, 26, and Ali Abbari, 21, both of Ottawa”

    Hmm…

    • Replies: @LKM
    @AndrewR

    Violent gang-related crime in Ottawa is almost exclusively the work of men who are either black, Muslim, or both, and thanks to our generous ways with Somali refugees, we have many in the latter category. At any given time, about half of Ottawa's most-wanted are of Muslim origins.

  4. Some advice from Kipling:

    The Stranger

    The Stranger within my gate,
    He may be true or kind,
    But he does not talk my talk–
    I cannot feel his mind.
    I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
    But not the soul behind.

    The men of my own stock,
    They may do ill or well,
    But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
    They are used to the lies I tell;
    And we do not need interpreters
    When we go to buy or sell.

    The Stranger within my gates,
    He may be evil or good,
    But I cannot tell what powers control–
    What reasons sway his mood;
    Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
    Shall repossess his blood.

    The men of my own stock,
    Bitter bad they may be,
    But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
    And see the things I see;
    And whatever I think of them and their likes
    They think of the likes of me.

    This was my father’s belief
    And this is also mine:
    Let the corn be all one sheaf–
    And the grapes be all one vine,
    Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
    By bitter bread and wine.

    • Replies: @John Johns
    @syonredux

    I'm normally dismissive of poetry but Kipling really hit the nail on the head with that one.

    , @Jay Igaboo
    @syonredux

    Rudyard was The Man--even as a young writer he as wisdom beyond his years. His much-hated (by Libtards) White Man's Burden written over 100 years ago brilliantly forecasts the price of Merkalism--hey, I think I've just invented a new word!
    It means a suicidal impulse of a barren and spiteful woman (or man) to gift others people's money and other's people's future generations to foreign invaders bent on destroying your civilisation.

    , @SteveRogers42
    @syonredux

    "Gods of the Copybook Headings", "Truce of the Bear", "Wrath of the Awakened Saxon".

    As relevant today as they were 100 years ago.

  5. You joke, but the British imposed knife control laws after banning handguns, because their vibrant youths kept murdering one another using whatever tools were at hand.

    https://www.gov.uk/buying-carrying-knives

    Meanwhile, in Germany in unrelated news:

    https://benkurtzblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/18/crazed-irishman-strikes-aboard-german-train/

    • Replies: @PiltdownMan
    @Ben Kurtz


    You joke, but the British imposed knife control laws after banning handguns, because their vibrant youths kept murdering one another using whatever tools were at hand.
     
    I feel old when I read of murders by stabbing in the British press, because I can remember a time when a stabbing was considered to be a heinous and un-British crime that only foreigners, usually described as 'swarthy', committed.

    Poisoning was normal, stabbing was not.

  6. Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don’t. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don’t, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    @Nick Diaz

    Not all Communists were bad either, but they still asked the question at passport control. For a reason. And if the answer, or even the suspicion, was "Da!", then you were SOOL.
    Adherents of a hostile power and violent subversive ideology often get the shitty end of the stick like that, ain't it a shame?

    Please go back to being Tiny Duck, you're much funnier when that personality is in control.

    , @FX Enderby
    @Nick Diaz

    Yeah, STFU Steve! Facts are baaad when they make people feel bad!

    Just because ending Muslim immigration would prevent Muslim terrorism doesn't mean it's the ONLY solution! We should imagine a hundred other less baaad options first and let them fail cuz we should be super ultra virtuous like good, good boy Nick and when they fail let our country burn. Cuz we HAVE to. We just do!

    Waaaaaaaa! (Sticks fingers in ears and hums loudly "I'm such a good person not like those dummy poopy heads like Steve and his eeeeeevil readers")

    Here is another fact you can ignore, Nick: your IQ is way too low for iSteve.

    , @jimmyriddle
    @Nick Diaz

    More Muslims = More problems

    That's one law social science that holds up pretty well. The US is in the enviable position of having a Muslim population of about 1%. Muslims tend to be reasonably well behaved at that level, give or take the odd bomb in Boston or shooting in Fort Hood or Orlando.

    If they act resolutely now, the American people can save themselves a world of trouble.

    Replies: @Anon

    , @Louis Renault
    @Nick Diaz


    Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem.

     

    Which is why the King of Saudi Arabia, defender of the holy places of Islam, accepts zero refugees. I suggest if it is good policy for the defender of the holy places of Islam it is good policy for the USA.
    , @Johanus de Morgateroyde
    @Nick Diaz


    Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do.
     
    Nick, here's a box of M&Ms. One of them is poisoned, but don't mind that. Enjoy.

    Replies: @Lurker

    , @Harold
    @Nick Diaz

    1. If a population produces a lot of geniuses it indicates the average intelligence is high. If a population produces a lot of monsters…

    2. Sure there are downsides to muslim immigration, but think of the upsides, like feeling good about yourself for being inclusive like the TV told you makes you a goodperson.

    , @Buffalo Joe
    @Nick Diaz

    Nick, Didn't Holly Holm kick your ass in UFC, maybe different Nick Diaz, but still a wuss. If you don't like this site don't visit.

    , @jeremiahjohnbalaya
    @Nick Diaz

    Muslims should be banned because Islam is fundamentally incompatible with Judeo-Christian-based Western liberal democracy. The fact that it produces an overabundance of terrorists (and an even larger percentage of adherents sympathetic to that terrorism) is just one manifestation of that incompatibility.

    Replies: @RonaldB

    , @Clyde
    @Nick Diaz

    ND..... There is zero upside to Muslim immigration and many negatives. France is 10% Mulsim so has larger problems and larger massacres than we do. We are under no obligation to allow in Muslim immigrants or any other kind. America exists for the benefit of people who live here not the people who want to live here. America really exists for its citizens with roots here not its green carders and the recently naturalized from third world holes who the Democrats bring in here to reliably vote for them.
    Why are you so hung up on allowing Muslim immigration to America? With robots and more automation they are obsolete.

    , @Anonymous
    @Nick Diaz

    Look.

    Just from good manners - and nothing else - how dare you write to the blog owner and *demand* that he should 'just stop it'?

    The phrases 'ill-bred' and 'ill-mannered' spring to mind when I read your rant.

  7. Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife. Why even make such a ridiculous point?

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    @Bee


    kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife
     
    Debateable, if like here in Blighty the hapless citizens are completely (I mean utterly, nakedly) disarmed, and the PoPo are famously dilatory in their response (c.f. Fusilier Lee Rigby), due to Elf'n'Safety concerns or some such fatuous rubbish.
    The assassin's worst enemy in our case is sheer boredom, fatigue, or an inability to keep up with his fleeing prey.
    Looks like the only Isles people in a position to survive the constant enrichment will be "resting" IRA men and the Proddy murder gangs.
    , @Harold
    @Bee

    And even more with a truck.

    , @Dr. X
    @Bee


    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife.
     
    Then why do the cops need them? Disarm the cops, just like in England.

    Replies: @Lurker

    , @Olorin
    @Bee

    And way way more with assault passenger jets.

  8. These types are described as ‘white male’ suspects. Nice to know.

  9. @Bee
    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife. Why even make such a ridiculous point?

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @Harold, @Dr. X, @Olorin

    kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife

    Debateable, if like here in Blighty the hapless citizens are completely (I mean utterly, nakedly) disarmed, and the PoPo are famously dilatory in their response (c.f. Fusilier Lee Rigby), due to Elf’n’Safety concerns or some such fatuous rubbish.
    The assassin’s worst enemy in our case is sheer boredom, fatigue, or an inability to keep up with his fleeing prey.
    Looks like the only Isles people in a position to survive the constant enrichment will be “resting” IRA men and the Proddy murder gangs.

  10. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Not all Communists were bad either, but they still asked the question at passport control. For a reason. And if the answer, or even the suspicion, was “Da!”, then you were SOOL.
    Adherents of a hostile power and violent subversive ideology often get the shitty end of the stick like that, ain’t it a shame?

    Please go back to being Tiny Duck, you’re much funnier when that personality is in control.

  11. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Yeah, STFU Steve! Facts are baaad when they make people feel bad!

    Just because ending Muslim immigration would prevent Muslim terrorism doesn’t mean it’s the ONLY solution! We should imagine a hundred other less baaad options first and let them fail cuz we should be super ultra virtuous like good, good boy Nick and when they fail let our country burn. Cuz we HAVE to. We just do!

    Waaaaaaaa! (Sticks fingers in ears and hums loudly “I’m such a good person not like those dummy poopy heads like Steve and his eeeeeevil readers”)

    Here is another fact you can ignore, Nick: your IQ is way too low for iSteve.

  12. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    More Muslims = More problems

    That’s one law social science that holds up pretty well. The US is in the enviable position of having a Muslim population of about 1%. Muslims tend to be reasonably well behaved at that level, give or take the odd bomb in Boston or shooting in Fort Hood or Orlando.

    If they act resolutely now, the American people can save themselves a world of trouble.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @jimmyriddle

    I don't believe that number.

  13. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem.

    Which is why the King of Saudi Arabia, defender of the holy places of Islam, accepts zero refugees. I suggest if it is good policy for the defender of the holy places of Islam it is good policy for the USA.

  14. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do.

    Nick, here’s a box of M&Ms. One of them is poisoned, but don’t mind that. Enjoy.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    @Johanus de Morgateroyde

    Nick, here’s a box of M&Ms. All but one of them is poisoned, but don’t mind that. Enjoy.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Oops, sorry. They were all poisoned. Too late. Oh dear.

  15. @Bee
    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife. Why even make such a ridiculous point?

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @Harold, @Dr. X, @Olorin

    And even more with a truck.

  16. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    1. If a population produces a lot of geniuses it indicates the average intelligence is high. If a population produces a lot of monsters…

    2. Sure there are downsides to muslim immigration, but think of the upsides, like feeling good about yourself for being inclusive like the TV told you makes you a goodperson.

  17. @Bee
    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife. Why even make such a ridiculous point?

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @Harold, @Dr. X, @Olorin

    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife.

    Then why do the cops need them? Disarm the cops, just like in England.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    @Dr. X


    Then why do the cops need them? Disarm the cops, just like in England.
     
    While most UK police are not routinelyarmed it's become a lot more common to see armed police around. I say more common but that itself is the slippery slope. At one time you never saw armed police. They had access to guns and used them but didnt normally carry them openly. The weird thing is it's only really happened since most guns were banned. . .

    Btw strictly speaking British police were never disarmed, they were unarmed from inception.

  18. The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    @Nick Diaz

    Nick, In a battle of wits you are unarmed.

    , @Chris Mallory
    @Nick Diaz

    Sounds like a plan. We should end all immigration for at least 50 years. All immigration has been bad for traditional Americans. The borders should have been closed in 1800.

    , @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @Nick Diaz

    I'll bet you think you are a world-class champion of social justice, don't you? Your self-important hubris invites nemesis to bring justice to you.

    Unfortunately, as a low-IQ, ignorant hick, unaware of your self-proclaimed status as a master of the universe, I don't have any reason to defer to you.

    Nevertheless, I would be more than happy to take you on in any intellectual topic germane to the essential issues facing the American polity.

    Name the topic, with the following exception:

    If you want the discourse to revolve around your area of expertise, namely your myopic "navel-gazing", where you have mistaken your sphincter for your umbilicus, then I'll beg off.

    But I will observe that just because your vision originates inside your large colon does not endow your perspective with anything more than a first-person observation of how your offal excites the disgust, and contempt, of all who read the scrawlings of your fecal matter on a computer screen.

    Or, to summarize my post in a manner your feeble mind can understand: fuck you Nick Diaz.

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Nick Diaz

    "Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem."

    Yeah, we've noticed what an intellectual titan you are. You don't even know how to spell "Cingapure". Let me guess - you're a communications major? J-school, maybe?

    You're an idiot. And you have been seen to be an idiot.

    Replies: @Alfa158

    , @Discard
    @Nick Diaz

    Your logic is very, very, weak. Germans do not produce a disproportionate number of pedophiles, so letting in Germans would not result in an increase in the rate of child molestation. OTOH, Moslems do produce a grossly disproportionate number of terrorists, as well as ordinary murderers and, ironically, child molesters. Were you as smart as you would like us to believe, you would not have handed your head to me so easily.

    Your fears for my self esteem are exaggerated.

    , @RonaldB
    @Nick Diaz

    Let's take the crux of the matter.

    The immediate reason given to stop Muslim immigration is that Muslims are much more likely to be terrorist, or terrorist-supporting, than the native population.

    But, let's take the characteristics of Islam itself. Without going into detail, because the information is widely available in books, or even on Muslim websites aimed at Muslims and not at soft-headed dhimmis:

    The core political mandates are totally incompatible with Western values, culture, and laws. Therefore, the very best result of Muslim immigration, even if no violence occurred, would be the legislative replacement of Western democracy and liberties with sharia restrictions and punishments;

    These political mandates of Islam are not optional; sharia mandates the death penalty for any attempt by a Muslim to modify established sharia law; it is a capital offense for a Muslim to even teach Islam, let alone criticize it;

    It is an accepted part of sharia law to use violence to spread Islam, including terror. Again, any attempt by a Muslim to modify this part of sharia law (or any part) is grounds for death.

    So, tell me again the unfairness of cutting off all Muslim immigration.

  19. Perhaps Trudeau could sit these young men down and explain to them it’s 2015.

    They clearly didn’t get the memo.

  20. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Nick, Didn’t Holly Holm kick your ass in UFC, maybe different Nick Diaz, but still a wuss. If you don’t like this site don’t visit.

  21. 1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An “average” is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that’s just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don’t want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don’t like.

    • Replies: @AKAHorace
    @Nick Diaz

    I think that most people here would be much happier accepting Northern Indian Hindus than Pakistani muslims. Racially they are pretty similar. In terms of behavior though there are big differences.

    , @Harold
    @Nick Diaz


    […] these traits are individual and best assessed individually.
     
    We don’t have the ability to assess these traits individually with any feasible test. Just as you can’t test for honesty by asking someone if they are honest.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptional. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier.
     
    Maybe, but I like them.

    It definitely makes me feel good that […]
     
    Yes, I know.

    I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a given ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don’t want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don’t like.
     
    What’s wrong with racism? How is being racially inclusive a moral imperative?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @Nick Diaz


    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla
     
    Then are white people like coleslaw?
    , @Charles Erwin Wilson
    @Nick Diaz


    It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge
     
    Who put an idiot like you in charge?
    , @FX Enderby
    @Nick Diaz

    Translation from babytalk:
    1. Nick has a chip on his shoulder about White folks
    2. Nick gets the good feelz cuz he no racist

    Seriously, Mr. Summa Cum Fraudly - you'd be better off commenting on a sub 100 IQ site like HuffPo... trust me!

    , @Anon
    @Nick Diaz

    Diaz? I guess you're from a family that came from Mexico, and you hate immigration because it would have kept people like you from coming to the US. And whoever it was in your family who came here, either you or your parents, chose to leave Mexico because it was a hellhole.

    And why is it a hellhole, a place no sane person wants to live?

    Hey, Diaz, you sound like a guy who wants to be thought of as an altruist. How come you aren't in Mexico, trying to fix its problems? Somehow, the solution every liberal seems to have is, "Come to the US, the rest of the world is unfixable." Your idea seems to be, cram all 7 billion people on planet inside the US, because this is only place that's run correctly. "Yes," you're thinking, "that will fix ALL problems."

    Except we can't even feed that many, much less solve their problems. You have great faith in whitey's problem solving ability, I must say. It's flattering, but even we have our practical limits and can't fix everything.

    So you think you're an altruist? Really? I don't see you behaving like one. The sole reason you seem to be here in the US is to do well for yourself. That's not altruism. How come you aren't in the land of your own people, trying to fix your own country's flaws?

    You see, every time a corrupt Mexican system wants to avoid dealing with its own problems, they just encourage people to leave, so the Mexican elite is left alone to run its little corruptocracy for its own benefit. It's been said that without the existence of the US, Mexico would have had a revolution by now. But this hasn't happened, because guys like you, who think you're altruists, and who think very highly of yourselves and of the purity of your own motives, ran away like cowards.

    Smarten up.

    , @Ikram
    @Nick Diaz

    I agree with Nick.

    Sailer is a bigot, but usually a smart and interesting one. This post was stupid. No value added. Scanning the globe for random crimes committed by people with muslim names is not a way to argue a point.

    Jaywalking Muslims in Anchorage. Sailer reports is first!

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Nick Diaz

    "Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla."

    Compared to Nick Diaz, most everyone is exceptional.

    , @Hippopotamusdrome
    @Nick Diaz



    Anglos are and have always been mid-tier.

     

    And yet, here we are, in a country colonized by Anglos, typing words on a computer, which was invented by Anglos, and the language of those words are English.


    city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there

     

    Singapore is an interesting choice as a counter-example of Anglo society, considering it was a British colony from 1819, it's flag had the Union Jack until 1959, it's schools teach in English, and even it's street signs are in English.

    Anyway, I'll just leave this here. Here's a drawing of what Singapore looked like before it was colonized by Anglos.

    Replies: @FX Enderby

    , @Discard
    @Nick Diaz

    Why would I need plausible deniability about my racism? White people ARE exceptional. We built and maintain the places that other peoples want to move to. Even they think we're exceptional.

    What is this reliable test of conscientiousness that we're going to give to all these foreign millions that want to come here? Checking for White skin and fluency in a Germanic language is the most accurate and cost effective method we have. And if we were to give IQ tests, most Mexicans would not qualify.

  22. @Ben Kurtz
    You joke, but the British imposed knife control laws after banning handguns, because their vibrant youths kept murdering one another using whatever tools were at hand.

    https://www.gov.uk/buying-carrying-knives

    Meanwhile, in Germany in unrelated news:

    HTTPS://benkurtzblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/18/crazed-irishman-strikes-aboard-german-train/

    Replies: @PiltdownMan

    You joke, but the British imposed knife control laws after banning handguns, because their vibrant youths kept murdering one another using whatever tools were at hand.

    I feel old when I read of murders by stabbing in the British press, because I can remember a time when a stabbing was considered to be a heinous and un-British crime that only foreigners, usually described as ‘swarthy’, committed.

    Poisoning was normal, stabbing was not.

  23. The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idio

    • Replies: @Trumpenproleteriat
    @Nick Diaz

    Mr. Biden is that you?

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=QWM6EuKxz5A

    , @Jean Cocteausten
    @Nick Diaz

    The <1% of Muslims who are terrorists are a concern, but this is not the main reason we need to be picky about which Muslims we admit. I have many Muslim colleagues who are fine and productive people. Reserving admission to the US for people like them requires careful vetting, nothing like the random mob that the idiot Merkel foisted on Europe.

    Replies: @Talha

    , @The Albino Sasquatch
    @Nick Diaz

    Nick, Corvinus is out looking for you. He said it's way past your bedtime.

    , @Dumbo
    @Nick Diaz

    "stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists"

    It certainly would. Although I don't think all of the refugees are "terrorists" per se, just demented, screwed-up individuals. No need to import them in any case.

    "all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia"

    I've heard that the "Russian" mafia is not really Russian, but what do I know.

    " all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles"

    I suppose it would, but are there more German pedophiles than from other nations? I thought it was more a Belgian thing.

  24. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    Nick, In a battle of wits you are unarmed.

  25. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    Sounds like a plan. We should end all immigration for at least 50 years. All immigration has been bad for traditional Americans. The borders should have been closed in 1800.

  26. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idio

    Replies: @Trumpenproleteriat, @Jean Cocteausten, @The Albino Sasquatch, @Dumbo

  27. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idio

    Replies: @Trumpenproleteriat, @Jean Cocteausten, @The Albino Sasquatch, @Dumbo

    The <1% of Muslims who are terrorists are a concern, but this is not the main reason we need to be picky about which Muslims we admit. I have many Muslim colleagues who are fine and productive people. Reserving admission to the US for people like them requires careful vetting, nothing like the random mob that the idiot Merkel foisted on Europe.

    • Replies: @Talha
    @Jean Cocteausten

    Damn JC - that's actually reasonable - a little too nuanced and well thought out for an anonymous board where people come to vent their frustrations - ;)

    Peace.

  28. As I wrote on another thread: “Well, the solution is really very simple. After the prayer to ban guns and the prayer to ban large trucks, we simply add a prayer to ban axes. That should do the trick.” I guess we should add a fourth prayer for knives, but it’s getting to the point when we are going to spend more time praying each day than a devout Muslim.

  29. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idio

    Replies: @Trumpenproleteriat, @Jean Cocteausten, @The Albino Sasquatch, @Dumbo

    Nick, Corvinus is out looking for you. He said it’s way past your bedtime.

  30. @jimmyriddle
    @Nick Diaz

    More Muslims = More problems

    That's one law social science that holds up pretty well. The US is in the enviable position of having a Muslim population of about 1%. Muslims tend to be reasonably well behaved at that level, give or take the odd bomb in Boston or shooting in Fort Hood or Orlando.

    If they act resolutely now, the American people can save themselves a world of trouble.

    Replies: @Anon

    I don’t believe that number.

  31. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    I think that most people here would be much happier accepting Northern Indian Hindus than Pakistani muslims. Racially they are pretty similar. In terms of behavior though there are big differences.

  32. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    […] these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    We don’t have the ability to assess these traits individually with any feasible test. Just as you can’t test for honesty by asking someone if they are honest.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptional. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier.

    Maybe, but I like them.

    It definitely makes me feel good that […]

    Yes, I know.

    I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a given ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don’t want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don’t like.

    What’s wrong with racism? How is being racially inclusive a moral imperative?

  33. @Johanus de Morgateroyde
    @Nick Diaz


    Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do.
     
    Nick, here's a box of M&Ms. One of them is poisoned, but don't mind that. Enjoy.

    Replies: @Lurker

    Nick, here’s a box of M&Ms. All but one of them is poisoned, but don’t mind that. Enjoy.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Oops, sorry. They were all poisoned. Too late. Oh dear.

  34. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    I’ll bet you think you are a world-class champion of social justice, don’t you? Your self-important hubris invites nemesis to bring justice to you.

    Unfortunately, as a low-IQ, ignorant hick, unaware of your self-proclaimed status as a master of the universe, I don’t have any reason to defer to you.

    Nevertheless, I would be more than happy to take you on in any intellectual topic germane to the essential issues facing the American polity.

    Name the topic, with the following exception:

    If you want the discourse to revolve around your area of expertise, namely your myopic “navel-gazing”, where you have mistaken your sphincter for your umbilicus, then I’ll beg off.

    But I will observe that just because your vision originates inside your large colon does not endow your perspective with anything more than a first-person observation of how your offal excites the disgust, and contempt, of all who read the scrawlings of your fecal matter on a computer screen.

    Or, to summarize my post in a manner your feeble mind can understand: fuck you Nick Diaz.

  35. @Dr. X
    @Bee


    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife.
     
    Then why do the cops need them? Disarm the cops, just like in England.

    Replies: @Lurker

    Then why do the cops need them? Disarm the cops, just like in England.

    While most UK police are not routinelyarmed it’s become a lot more common to see armed police around. I say more common but that itself is the slippery slope. At one time you never saw armed police. They had access to guns and used them but didnt normally carry them openly. The weird thing is it’s only really happened since most guns were banned. . .

    Btw strictly speaking British police were never disarmed, they were unarmed from inception.

  36. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla

    Then are white people like coleslaw?

  37. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge

    Who put an idiot like you in charge?

  38. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha…wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idio

    Replies: @Trumpenproleteriat, @Jean Cocteausten, @The Albino Sasquatch, @Dumbo

    “stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists”

    It certainly would. Although I don’t think all of the refugees are “terrorists” per se, just demented, screwed-up individuals. No need to import them in any case.

    “all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia”

    I’ve heard that the “Russian” mafia is not really Russian, but what do I know.

    ” all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles”

    I suppose it would, but are there more German pedophiles than from other nations? I thought it was more a Belgian thing.

  39. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    Translation from babytalk:
    1. Nick has a chip on his shoulder about White folks
    2. Nick gets the good feelz cuz he no racist

    Seriously, Mr. Summa Cum Fraudly – you’d be better off commenting on a sub 100 IQ site like HuffPo… trust me!

  40. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    Diaz? I guess you’re from a family that came from Mexico, and you hate immigration because it would have kept people like you from coming to the US. And whoever it was in your family who came here, either you or your parents, chose to leave Mexico because it was a hellhole.

    And why is it a hellhole, a place no sane person wants to live?

    Hey, Diaz, you sound like a guy who wants to be thought of as an altruist. How come you aren’t in Mexico, trying to fix its problems? Somehow, the solution every liberal seems to have is, “Come to the US, the rest of the world is unfixable.” Your idea seems to be, cram all 7 billion people on planet inside the US, because this is only place that’s run correctly. “Yes,” you’re thinking, “that will fix ALL problems.”

    Except we can’t even feed that many, much less solve their problems. You have great faith in whitey’s problem solving ability, I must say. It’s flattering, but even we have our practical limits and can’t fix everything.

    So you think you’re an altruist? Really? I don’t see you behaving like one. The sole reason you seem to be here in the US is to do well for yourself. That’s not altruism. How come you aren’t in the land of your own people, trying to fix your own country’s flaws?

    You see, every time a corrupt Mexican system wants to avoid dealing with its own problems, they just encourage people to leave, so the Mexican elite is left alone to run its little corruptocracy for its own benefit. It’s been said that without the existence of the US, Mexico would have had a revolution by now. But this hasn’t happened, because guys like you, who think you’re altruists, and who think very highly of yourselves and of the purity of your own motives, ran away like cowards.

    Smarten up.

  41. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Muslims should be banned because Islam is fundamentally incompatible with Judeo-Christian-based Western liberal democracy. The fact that it produces an overabundance of terrorists (and an even larger percentage of adherents sympathetic to that terrorism) is just one manifestation of that incompatibility.

    • Replies: @RonaldB
    @jeremiahjohnbalaya

    You have it exactly right.

    Imagine Muslim immigration without the terrorism. The Muslims would be just as insular and isolated, just as cut off from the surrounding culture, just as supportive of Muslim identity groups such as CAIR, ISNA and other Muslim Brotherhood fronts. The Muslims would continue infiltrating political parties (Republicans in particular) and continue to use money and political pressure to get into positions of power.

    Eventually, sharia law would be enforced, just by attrition.

    In a sense, terrorism is almost a benefit. It alerts the population there is an alien threat in their midst, and gives them warning to act. Whether they take the warning or not is a different question, but at least the fight is joined. I'd rather lose in an open fight than get nibbled to death by gnats.

    I think the terror side of Islam may have overplayed its hand in Europe and the US. Certainly, if they had waited 10 or 15 years, they would have been assured of victory.

  42. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    I agree with Nick.

    Sailer is a bigot, but usually a smart and interesting one. This post was stupid. No value added. Scanning the globe for random crimes committed by people with muslim names is not a way to argue a point.

    Jaywalking Muslims in Anchorage. Sailer reports is first!

  43. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    “Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla.”

    Compared to Nick Diaz, most everyone is exceptional.

  44. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    ND….. There is zero upside to Muslim immigration and many negatives. France is 10% Mulsim so has larger problems and larger massacres than we do. We are under no obligation to allow in Muslim immigrants or any other kind. America exists for the benefit of people who live here not the people who want to live here. America really exists for its citizens with roots here not its green carders and the recently naturalized from third world holes who the Democrats bring in here to reliably vote for them.
    Why are you so hung up on allowing Muslim immigration to America? With robots and more automation they are obsolete.

  45. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    “Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem.”

    Yeah, we’ve noticed what an intellectual titan you are. You don’t even know how to spell “Cingapure”. Let me guess – you’re a communications major? J-school, maybe?

    You’re an idiot. And you have been seen to be an idiot.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
    @Mr. Anon

    Nick calls it "Cingapure" because it is called Cingapura in Portugese, and Nick is Brazilian. This is why we should listen to his advice. If we did then we too could live in a country as vibrant, functional and desirable as his native Brazil.

  46. @Nick Diaz
    Sailer, STFU. Your pathetic attemps at sarcasm are unwarranted. Yes, some Muslims are terrorists who bomb people. Some Muslims are criminals. You want to extradite or lock up those Muslims? I am on board. Now stop pretending like this is something that all Muslims or even most Muslims do. The vast majority of Muslims don't. Stop your pathetic attemps at proposing that the only solution to the problem is to stop ALL Muslim immigration.

    Your continuous attempts at making sarcastic quips pointing out extremely obvious things as if they were some profound revelations, and as if they proved your points, when they clearly don't, is annoying. Just stop it. Yes, Muslim terrorists are bad. Yes, Muslim criminals are bad, too. Does this prove your assertion that Muslim immigration is the problem? NO. Obviously, it is the immigration of terrorists and criminals that is the problem. But this obvious fact does not fit YOUR narrative that there is a Muslim immigration problem and that the only solution is a moratorium on all Muslim immigration.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @FX Enderby, @jimmyriddle, @Louis Renault, @Johanus de Morgateroyde, @Harold, @Buffalo Joe, @jeremiahjohnbalaya, @Clyde, @Anonymous

    Look.

    Just from good manners – and nothing else – how dare you write to the blog owner and *demand* that he should ‘just stop it’?

    The phrases ‘ill-bred’ and ‘ill-mannered’ spring to mind when I read your rant.

  47. @Mr. Anon
    @Nick Diaz

    "Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won’t be good for your self-esteem."

    Yeah, we've noticed what an intellectual titan you are. You don't even know how to spell "Cingapure". Let me guess - you're a communications major? J-school, maybe?

    You're an idiot. And you have been seen to be an idiot.

    Replies: @Alfa158

    Nick calls it “Cingapure” because it is called Cingapura in Portugese, and Nick is Brazilian. This is why we should listen to his advice. If we did then we too could live in a country as vibrant, functional and desirable as his native Brazil.

  48. @Bee
    Silly comment. One person can kill way more people with an assault weapon than with a knife. Why even make such a ridiculous point?

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @Harold, @Dr. X, @Olorin

    And way way more with assault passenger jets.

  49. @AndrewR
    "Mohamed Mohamed, 26, and Ali Abbari, 21, both of Ottawa"

    Hmm...

    Replies: @LKM

    Violent gang-related crime in Ottawa is almost exclusively the work of men who are either black, Muslim, or both, and thanks to our generous ways with Somali refugees, we have many in the latter category. At any given time, about half of Ottawa’s most-wanted are of Muslim origins.

  50. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    Anglos are and have always been mid-tier.

    And yet, here we are, in a country colonized by Anglos, typing words on a computer, which was invented by Anglos, and the language of those words are English.

    city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there

    Singapore is an interesting choice as a counter-example of Anglo society, considering it was a British colony from 1819, it’s flag had the Union Jack until 1959, it’s schools teach in English, and even it’s street signs are in English.

    Anyway, I’ll just leave this here. Here’s a drawing of what Singapore looked like before it was colonized by Anglos.

    • Replies: @FX Enderby
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    And the ruling People's Action Party has ties to the British Union of Fascists - check out their current logo!
    Lee Kuan Yew was an admirer of Oswald Mosely. CingaPURE indeed!

  51. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    Your logic is very, very, weak. Germans do not produce a disproportionate number of pedophiles, so letting in Germans would not result in an increase in the rate of child molestation. OTOH, Moslems do produce a grossly disproportionate number of terrorists, as well as ordinary murderers and, ironically, child molesters. Were you as smart as you would like us to believe, you would not have handed your head to me so easily.

    Your fears for my self esteem are exaggerated.

  52. @Nick Diaz
    @Harold

    1. This is immaterial because traits like intelligence and conscientiousness are individual. An "average" is just a statistical construct that factors in an aggregate of individuals. Even if ethnic groups vary in such traits as statistical averages, it does not change the fact that these traits are individual and best assessed individually.

    Also, you act like white people are exceptionsla. Anglos are and have always been mid-tier. There is a reason why city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there. The reason: because there are a LOT of alcoholic, indigent, uneducated, indolent white people.

    2. It definitely makes me feel good that I am letting in people who are good and hard working because I chose to judge the merits of immigration applicants individually and not based on their ethnicity. But, hey, that's just me. I guess if you are a racist, the existence of a few terrorists in a gicen ethnic group gives you plausible deniability against your own racism and allows you to pretend like you don't want them in your country because they are all terrorist and not because they are from an ethnic group you don't like.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @Harold, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @FX Enderby, @Anon, @Ikram, @Mr. Anon, @Hippopotamusdrome, @Discard

    Why would I need plausible deniability about my racism? White people ARE exceptional. We built and maintain the places that other peoples want to move to. Even they think we’re exceptional.

    What is this reliable test of conscientiousness that we’re going to give to all these foreign millions that want to come here? Checking for White skin and fluency in a Germanic language is the most accurate and cost effective method we have. And if we were to give IQ tests, most Mexicans would not qualify.

  53. @Hippopotamusdrome
    @Nick Diaz



    Anglos are and have always been mid-tier.

     

    And yet, here we are, in a country colonized by Anglos, typing words on a computer, which was invented by Anglos, and the language of those words are English.


    city-states such as Cingapure do not allow over 90% of white people who want to immigrate there

     

    Singapore is an interesting choice as a counter-example of Anglo society, considering it was a British colony from 1819, it's flag had the Union Jack until 1959, it's schools teach in English, and even it's street signs are in English.

    Anyway, I'll just leave this here. Here's a drawing of what Singapore looked like before it was colonized by Anglos.

    Replies: @FX Enderby

    And the ruling People’s Action Party has ties to the British Union of Fascists – check out their current logo!
    Lee Kuan Yew was an admirer of Oswald Mosely. CingaPURE indeed!

  54. @syonredux
    Some advice from Kipling:




    The Stranger

    The Stranger within my gate,
    He may be true or kind,
    But he does not talk my talk–
    I cannot feel his mind.
    I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
    But not the soul behind.

    The men of my own stock,
    They may do ill or well,
    But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
    They are used to the lies I tell;
    And we do not need interpreters
    When we go to buy or sell.

    The Stranger within my gates,
    He may be evil or good,
    But I cannot tell what powers control–
    What reasons sway his mood;
    Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
    Shall repossess his blood.

    The men of my own stock,
    Bitter bad they may be,
    But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
    And see the things I see;
    And whatever I think of them and their likes
    They think of the likes of me.


    This was my father’s belief
    And this is also mine:
    Let the corn be all one sheaf–
    And the grapes be all one vine,
    Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
    By bitter bread and wine.

    Replies: @John Johns, @Jay Igaboo, @SteveRogers42

    I’m normally dismissive of poetry but Kipling really hit the nail on the head with that one.

  55. @Expletive Deleted

    Canadians must be disarmed of all those dangerous dangerous knives. Knife Control Now!
     
    Brits are there already, and there are swingeing imprisonment penalties for having even a tiny one in, say, the trunk of a vehicle, unless you can convince the magistrates it's essential for your trade. No step is too extreme in Making Safe The Public.
    Although it's a right pain in the arse having to roast a whole cow every time you want a sandwich.

    Replies: @Jay Igaboo

    Correct.
    I’m Scottish AND British and here in Scotland the ultra-Left SNP that runs the devolved Scottish Government tried to legislate an automatic nine month jail sentence for anyone in possession of a knife with a blade length of over 3 and 1/2 inches outside the confines of their home ( or workplace IF it was a tool of their trade. No defence, and no mitigations allowed.
    Thankfully, the justiciary have refused to cooperate with the SNP’s attacks on Common Law and have headed of some of these Stalinest loons worst excesses.
    I’ve been an outdoorsman since infancy( or for pedants out there I guess I was an outdoorsinfant, outdoorsboy, etc to coin some ridiculous words) and I carry a knife of some description almost all the time, usually a Swiss Army Huntsmanr, which I find invaluable whether I’m working on my car, gardening, our in the woods or hills- you name it, it’s useful.
    Because they are so useful, I have four of them, two Huntsmans and two with a 4″ lockblade( plus a great sawblade, can opener, etc.
    I gave one to my oldest son when he was 16 ten years ago– he gave it back to me when the SNP announced their planned legislation as he didn’t want arrested and given a police record that would damn him in many ways.
    A couple of years back I had been in the woods , miles from anyone for a couple of days, sleeping out in a bivi bag with a few other items of equipment, including a sheath knife for constructing a shelter that was , as they are designed to, on my belt.
    I had got so used to it I has forgotten I was wearing it, and after I’d walked to the road to drive home, I stopped off at a supermarket STILL unaware that I had it on.
    When I realised I still had it, I was out of there in a flash before I was in the jail.
    Most Britons today have zero understanding of why a population should have a right to bear arms, and most have very little understanding of the two most precious gifts any politicians in history have given to their people–the 1st and 2nd Amendments gifted to Americans by those Dead White Males, The Founding Fathers.

    ( The most recent SNP Nazism is a clampdown on airgun ownership– the maximum power is 12 ft/lbs, which gives a muzzle velocity of 660f/ps with a very short .22 pellet. I have to spend £86 per gun on licencing them and registering them with the police. When I was a kid, before we were a multi-kulti police state, kids could walk about with an air gun or a sheath knife and nobody cared as long as they were careful. Boy Scouts actually wore a sheath knife as part of their uniform, a knife that would get then canned and counselled about how violently patriarchal their crime was!

    • Replies: @RonaldB
    @Jay Igaboo

    Hey, I'm sympathetic to you, Jay. It sounds onerous to be in the clutches of a totalitarian society masquerading as free. So, every cook becomes a major felon while carrying a kitchen knife from the store to the kitchen.

    It's funny how totalitarian societies always focus on airguns. Chicago has a ban on airguns that, as far as I can tell, is as stringent as its ordinances against handguns. Airguns would be almost useless for offense (although not bad for assassinations), but would be a credible defense against home invaders.

    I have a private opinion that leftists really identify with street gangs, like the Spartacists of post-World War I Germany, and the Hitler SA street-fighters. The street gangs have complete dominance once the civilian population is totally disarmed, giving the would-be dictator the opportunity to seize power in a coup, due to the manufactured crisis of anarchy.

  56. @syonredux
    Some advice from Kipling:




    The Stranger

    The Stranger within my gate,
    He may be true or kind,
    But he does not talk my talk–
    I cannot feel his mind.
    I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
    But not the soul behind.

    The men of my own stock,
    They may do ill or well,
    But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
    They are used to the lies I tell;
    And we do not need interpreters
    When we go to buy or sell.

    The Stranger within my gates,
    He may be evil or good,
    But I cannot tell what powers control–
    What reasons sway his mood;
    Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
    Shall repossess his blood.

    The men of my own stock,
    Bitter bad they may be,
    But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
    And see the things I see;
    And whatever I think of them and their likes
    They think of the likes of me.


    This was my father’s belief
    And this is also mine:
    Let the corn be all one sheaf–
    And the grapes be all one vine,
    Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
    By bitter bread and wine.

    Replies: @John Johns, @Jay Igaboo, @SteveRogers42

    Rudyard was The Man–even as a young writer he as wisdom beyond his years. His much-hated (by Libtards) White Man’s Burden written over 100 years ago brilliantly forecasts the price of Merkalism–hey, I think I’ve just invented a new word!
    It means a suicidal impulse of a barren and spiteful woman (or man) to gift others people’s money and other’s people’s future generations to foreign invaders bent on destroying your civilisation.

  57. @Jean Cocteausten
    @Nick Diaz

    The <1% of Muslims who are terrorists are a concern, but this is not the main reason we need to be picky about which Muslims we admit. I have many Muslim colleagues who are fine and productive people. Reserving admission to the US for people like them requires careful vetting, nothing like the random mob that the idiot Merkel foisted on Europe.

    Replies: @Talha

    Damn JC – that’s actually reasonable – a little too nuanced and well thought out for an anonymous board where people come to vent their frustrations – 😉

    Peace.

  58. @Jay Igaboo
    @Expletive Deleted

    Correct.
    I'm Scottish AND British and here in Scotland the ultra-Left SNP that runs the devolved Scottish Government tried to legislate an automatic nine month jail sentence for anyone in possession of a knife with a blade length of over 3 and 1/2 inches outside the confines of their home ( or workplace IF it was a tool of their trade. No defence, and no mitigations allowed.
    Thankfully, the justiciary have refused to cooperate with the SNP's attacks on Common Law and have headed of some of these Stalinest loons worst excesses.
    I've been an outdoorsman since infancy( or for pedants out there I guess I was an outdoorsinfant, outdoorsboy, etc to coin some ridiculous words) and I carry a knife of some description almost all the time, usually a Swiss Army Huntsmanr, which I find invaluable whether I'm working on my car, gardening, our in the woods or hills- you name it, it's useful.
    Because they are so useful, I have four of them, two Huntsmans and two with a 4" lockblade( plus a great sawblade, can opener, etc.
    I gave one to my oldest son when he was 16 ten years ago-- he gave it back to me when the SNP announced their planned legislation as he didn't want arrested and given a police record that would damn him in many ways.
    A couple of years back I had been in the woods , miles from anyone for a couple of days, sleeping out in a bivi bag with a few other items of equipment, including a sheath knife for constructing a shelter that was , as they are designed to, on my belt.
    I had got so used to it I has forgotten I was wearing it, and after I'd walked to the road to drive home, I stopped off at a supermarket STILL unaware that I had it on.
    When I realised I still had it, I was out of there in a flash before I was in the jail.
    Most Britons today have zero understanding of why a population should have a right to bear arms, and most have very little understanding of the two most precious gifts any politicians in history have given to their people--the 1st and 2nd Amendments gifted to Americans by those Dead White Males, The Founding Fathers.

    ( The most recent SNP Nazism is a clampdown on airgun ownership-- the maximum power is 12 ft/lbs, which gives a muzzle velocity of 660f/ps with a very short .22 pellet. I have to spend £86 per gun on licencing them and registering them with the police. When I was a kid, before we were a multi-kulti police state, kids could walk about with an air gun or a sheath knife and nobody cared as long as they were careful. Boy Scouts actually wore a sheath knife as part of their uniform, a knife that would get then canned and counselled about how violently patriarchal their crime was!

    Replies: @RonaldB

    Hey, I’m sympathetic to you, Jay. It sounds onerous to be in the clutches of a totalitarian society masquerading as free. So, every cook becomes a major felon while carrying a kitchen knife from the store to the kitchen.

    It’s funny how totalitarian societies always focus on airguns. Chicago has a ban on airguns that, as far as I can tell, is as stringent as its ordinances against handguns. Airguns would be almost useless for offense (although not bad for assassinations), but would be a credible defense against home invaders.

    I have a private opinion that leftists really identify with street gangs, like the Spartacists of post-World War I Germany, and the Hitler SA street-fighters. The street gangs have complete dominance once the civilian population is totally disarmed, giving the would-be dictator the opportunity to seize power in a coup, due to the manufactured crisis of anarchy.

  59. @jeremiahjohnbalaya
    @Nick Diaz

    Muslims should be banned because Islam is fundamentally incompatible with Judeo-Christian-based Western liberal democracy. The fact that it produces an overabundance of terrorists (and an even larger percentage of adherents sympathetic to that terrorism) is just one manifestation of that incompatibility.

    Replies: @RonaldB

    You have it exactly right.

    Imagine Muslim immigration without the terrorism. The Muslims would be just as insular and isolated, just as cut off from the surrounding culture, just as supportive of Muslim identity groups such as CAIR, ISNA and other Muslim Brotherhood fronts. The Muslims would continue infiltrating political parties (Republicans in particular) and continue to use money and political pressure to get into positions of power.

    Eventually, sharia law would be enforced, just by attrition.

    In a sense, terrorism is almost a benefit. It alerts the population there is an alien threat in their midst, and gives them warning to act. Whether they take the warning or not is a different question, but at least the fight is joined. I’d rather lose in an open fight than get nibbled to death by gnats.

    I think the terror side of Islam may have overplayed its hand in Europe and the US. Certainly, if they had waited 10 or 15 years, they would have been assured of victory.

  60. @Nick Diaz
    @FX Enderby

    The irony of an ignorant hick like you saying that I have a low IQ. Even funnier stating that I have a low IQ for iSteve. Ha ha ha ha...wow. You guys really have no self-awareness, huh? I am sorry to break it to you, but you guys are not exactly summa cum laude material. Trust me, buddy: you better stay quiet. You do NOT want to engage me intellectually. Trust me. It won't be good for your self-esteem.

    As for you point, yes, I guess stopping all Muslim immigration will stop the entrance of all Muslim terrorists, just like stopping all German immigration would stop the entrance of all German pedophiles, and stopping all Russian immigration will stop the entrance of all Russian Mafia, etc. You are an idiot.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe, @Chris Mallory, @Charles Erwin Wilson, @Mr. Anon, @Discard, @RonaldB

    Let’s take the crux of the matter.

    The immediate reason given to stop Muslim immigration is that Muslims are much more likely to be terrorist, or terrorist-supporting, than the native population.

    But, let’s take the characteristics of Islam itself. Without going into detail, because the information is widely available in books, or even on Muslim websites aimed at Muslims and not at soft-headed dhimmis:

    The core political mandates are totally incompatible with Western values, culture, and laws. Therefore, the very best result of Muslim immigration, even if no violence occurred, would be the legislative replacement of Western democracy and liberties with sharia restrictions and punishments;

    These political mandates of Islam are not optional; sharia mandates the death penalty for any attempt by a Muslim to modify established sharia law; it is a capital offense for a Muslim to even teach Islam, let alone criticize it;

    It is an accepted part of sharia law to use violence to spread Islam, including terror. Again, any attempt by a Muslim to modify this part of sharia law (or any part) is grounds for death.

    So, tell me again the unfairness of cutting off all Muslim immigration.

  61. “Mohamed Mohamed, 26, and Ali Abbari, 21, both of Ottawa”

    They sound French.

  62. @syonredux
    Some advice from Kipling:




    The Stranger

    The Stranger within my gate,
    He may be true or kind,
    But he does not talk my talk–
    I cannot feel his mind.
    I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
    But not the soul behind.

    The men of my own stock,
    They may do ill or well,
    But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
    They are used to the lies I tell;
    And we do not need interpreters
    When we go to buy or sell.

    The Stranger within my gates,
    He may be evil or good,
    But I cannot tell what powers control–
    What reasons sway his mood;
    Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
    Shall repossess his blood.

    The men of my own stock,
    Bitter bad they may be,
    But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
    And see the things I see;
    And whatever I think of them and their likes
    They think of the likes of me.


    This was my father’s belief
    And this is also mine:
    Let the corn be all one sheaf–
    And the grapes be all one vine,
    Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
    By bitter bread and wine.

    Replies: @John Johns, @Jay Igaboo, @SteveRogers42

    “Gods of the Copybook Headings”, “Truce of the Bear”, “Wrath of the Awakened Saxon”.

    As relevant today as they were 100 years ago.

  63. I just want our government to treat the Muslim community, a measurable percentage of which DO commit acts of terrorism, in exactly the same way they treat the militia movement..with the same attention from the Acronym-American community.

  64. Brits are there already, and there are swingeing imprisonment penalties for having even a tiny one in, say, the trunk of a vehicle, unless you can convince the magistrates it’s essential for your trade. No step is too extreme in Making Safe The Public.
    Although it’s a right pain in the arse having to roast a whole cow every time you want a sandwich.

    I would violate that law every day, were I a British subject. Since I am not, I will simply avoid the place. No way in hell I visit a diverse country where I am forbidden carrying even a knife. Pity, really.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS