The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Meghan Markle and Althea Bernstein
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Princess Markle, or whatever her title is, played a supporting role in my July 1, 2020 Taki’s Magazine column “Putting Out Fire with Lighter Fluid:”

After race car driver Bubba Wallace’s NooseCAR debacle last week, it would have taken somebody truly dumb and publicity-crazed to breathe life into this week’s even more absurd hate-crime allegation: biracial 18-year-old Althea Bernstein’s assertion that four “classic Wisconsin frat boys” squirted lighter fluid on her and set her ablaze by tossing a lighter into her car in downtown Madison, Wis., during an Antifa riot.

While nobody in the national press has dared express any skepticism about this hilariously unlikely tale, it hadn’t been getting the giant push that would have been expected if anybody of any importance were convinced this whopper were true.

After all, if Bernstein’s yarn about roving racist frat boys in Hawaiian shirts randomly incinerating a Jewish-Unitarian Woman of Color actually happened, it would be gigantic news, far bigger than, as Joe Biden would say, what’s his name—Pink Floyd? Boy George?—that drugged-up bouncer who wound up dead while resisting arrest and suddenly became history’s greatest saint…

But, c’mon… Frat boys setting a semi-black girl on fire in super-liberal Madison is, obviously, Tawana Brawley/Jackie Coakley-level hate hoaxery, a silly teenager’s attempt to improvise an excuse for being where she shouldn’t have been.

Showing more caution than is typical in these circumstances, the national press reported Bernstein’s claims with a straight face, but then did only the minimum to follow up on them. …

But then, just as the Althea Bernstein story was being allowed to quietly fade away over the weekend, that special someone—Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, wife of Prince Harry—stepped forward to make a really futile and stupid gesture to keep this latest Hate Hoax from being allowed to be forgotten the way the cooler heads in the media had wished.

On October 1, the Madison Police and the Department of Justice quietly announced there was no evidence that the crime alleged by Ms. Bernstein ever happened and they were closing the case. Her parents thanked the investigators for their efforts.

 
Hide 94 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It’s stuff like this that should be publicized…not to hurt the girl…but to show the compassion of a police department

    Oh well

    Meghan’s going after Kate, and Harry is not going to give up his place in the line of Succession which means Kate, Will and all three children are on the chopping block

    I don’t know what the plan is from the power’s that be…but it ain’t looking good

    • Troll: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @Thoughts

    Follow the original iSteve conversation here

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/immigrant-entrepreneurs-engage-in-striking-levels-of-co-ethnic-hiring/#comment-4511610

    , @AndrewR
    @Thoughts

    William isn't going to give up his place, and even if he did, making his kids give up their place due to one unpleasant incident involving their mother is too ludicrous to consider.

    As for our dweeb host, it's really cringe that you're playing dumb just to try to show how cool you are for not knowing basic things about the British royal family. You're 62 years old but act like you're 12.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    , @Anon
    @Thoughts

    @ “ I don’t know what the plan is from the power’s that be…but it ain’t looking good“

    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point. Very careful editing by CBS. And the spinmeisters are at it today, further clobbering —by exclusion of Queen & Phillip— the future of the Monarchy, William, as racist. Notice it is on the word of good old Harry that the crucial knife was twisted in.

    The Monarchy is well and truly smeared as a high point in institutional racism. Notice also the ongoing attempt to topple Felipe VI and end Spain as an historical nation.

    Daniel Cohn Bendit, that bulwark of morals, while he reigned in the European Parliament, was quite frank about the necessity of doing away with nations.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Reg Cæsar

    , @Paperback Writer
    @Thoughts


    Meghan’s going after Kate

     

    Very insightful. You hit the nail on the head. Meghan has a deadly hate for William's wife - the future Queen of England.

    This all may sound stupid but it's not. Meghan is trying to destroy the BRF using racial animus and wokeness in the US, which has its fans in the UK. She won't succeed but it won't end well.
  2. Interestingly, Harry is just dumb enough to make this marriage last after Meghan has milked the relationship and race racket for every last dime, at which point Harry will have to go hat in hand back to London a’beggin for support, just like his feckless forbear, the Duke of Windsor.

    If Her Majesty had any sense of humour left, she’d revoke the Sussex title and bestow the Windsor title to make a point.

    • Replies: @Thoughts
    @The Alarmist

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    The only question is...is he evil enough to steal his brother's birthright or worse?

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @Wilkey, @Paperback Writer

    , @Paperback Writer
    @The Alarmist

    The problem is Andrew. He's a creep, and the lack of equity in revoking the one title while keeping his would be glaring.

    I wish that "dearieme" would comment.

    Replies: @Curle

    , @Paperback Writer
    @The Alarmist

    The problem is Andrew. He's a creep, and the lack of equity in revoking the one title while keeping his would be glaring.

    I wish that "dearieme" would comment.

    , @Alden
    @The Alarmist

    The Duke of Windsor never went back to London begging for support. He took a massive inheritance with him when he left. The retard younger brother King George was forbidden by his handlers to let Windsor back in the country.

    The UK royal family is a joke. The Queens only real position is head of the Commonwealth. Look at the pictures during the commonwealth conferences aka cannibals and cleptomaniacs convention . The Queen and PM the only Whites lost in a group of the most bloodthirsty blackest most corrupt kleptomaniacs on earth. They spend half their time in Africa posing with black 5 year olds and the rest chasing every liberal environmentalist leftist cause around.

    Their entertainment value is getting old.

    There’s a great show on Netflix. The Windsors Mean spirited and vulgar. Best show ever about the royal family. Too bad it didn’t feature Prince Andrews real father. Harry’s not the only bastard in the family.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  3. Anonymous[214] • Disclaimer says:

    “Princess Markle” is… IMO.. a somewhat attractive woman… and not entirely devoid of actual morality… so I get it when DJT wished her husband luck and said he’s gonna need it.

  4. But the Royals were mean to Meghan!

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @Redneck farmer

    I think they bent over backwards to be kind and welcoming to her, but she is a prima donna par excellence and refused to be pleased.

    She wanted them to be toadies and that's a bridge too far for the House of Windsor.
    In revenge, she paints them all as racists because she knows that will do the most damage. Never mind she's no blacker than millions of other white folks.

    https://nypost.com/2021/03/07/meghan-markle-reveals-he-true-self-in-oprah-interview-devine/

  5. I read in the gossip tabloids that Meghan Markle hated the weather in London because she thinks it’s way too cold there. No wonder she wanted to get the hell out of London ASAP and move back to Los Angeles. Meghan Markle wants to live and die in L.A, it’s the only place for her!

    • Replies: @profnasty
    @Luzzatto

    The first TwoPac song I've heard.
    With any luck....

    , @Alden
    @Luzzatto

    She lived in Chicago 4 years and Toronto 7, much colder than London. Who are we peons to begrudge them their happiness?

    Today, 3/9 her father will go on British TV to discuss Meghan. Stay tuned for more details.

  6. I just heard on the tv that Harry is blaming this all starting because of their trip to Australia, and the fact that apparently we loved them to death, regardless of skin tone. So they went home sulking to Liz. Little did they know that it was a well thought out ploy on behalf of the republicans here to sabotage the monarchy.

    • Replies: @Barnard
    @Jiminy

    The racism garbage could only have worked in the last 10 years. Even shortly before that someone would have been willing to put the question to them, "if Harry had married a white self absorbed, domineering American entertainer who had no respect for the monarchy or its customs traditions do you think she would have been treated any differently?" I have a feeling it won't go well for Archie or his sister as adults when they try to pass themselves off as black and they are well under 10% Sub Saharan.

  7. @The Alarmist
    Interestingly, Harry is just dumb enough to make this marriage last after Meghan has milked the relationship and race racket for every last dime, at which point Harry will have to go hat in hand back to London a’beggin for support, just like his feckless forbear, the Duke of Windsor.

    If Her Majesty had any sense of humour left, she’d revoke the Sussex title and bestow the Windsor title to make a point.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Paperback Writer, @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    The only question is…is he evil enough to steal his brother’s birthright or worse?

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    @Thoughts

    It’s a secret plan to re-unite the US and UK under a Meghan Presidency and a Harry Monarchy ;)

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Abolish_public_education

    , @Wilkey
    @Thoughts


    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.
     
    Bingo. Perhaps all he has left to do is find some damning evidence. Perhaps a video of Queen Elizabeth referring to Kamala Harris as “very articulate” while Prince Charles is eating pancakes with Aunt Jemima syrup and Prince Harry is singing along to some rap song - not one with the N word, but cultural appropriation, nonetheless. All followed with scandalous interviews of NHS employees furious that his two sons refuse to take hormone treatments and vigorously object to having their willies cut off because they were once caught playing with their sister’s dolls (not one of which was black) while little Princess Charlotte was off in the corner reading Dr. Seuss books.

    It will be a scandal for the ages - a cornucopia of intolerance and hate that will leave the royal family with no option but to all abdicate in favor of King Harkle and his charming bride, Queen Meghan Lucretia’niqua’ashante’malcolmexquess I.
    , @Paperback Writer
    @Thoughts

    Harry isn't dumb but he's crazy, and he'll never be King, OK? You had one good insight: that Meghan's real hate object in all of this is to take down Kate. She hates Kate.

    Kate is white, taller, genuinely beautiful, comes from an intact family, pops out gorgeous kids with distressing regularity, and is amazingly stable and grounded. She's going to be Queen. After getting mildly razzed by the press for a while (a requisite in Britain) she became adored.

    Meghan is racially mixed, short, pretty but not beautiful, a child of divorce, started late with the kids, and is unstable and ungrounded. She'll never be Queen. She was treated poorly by the press and was never going to be accepted. Someone is to blame for this.

    Meghan is jealous. Jealousy is a corrosive emotion.

    Her hubs is 6th in line. If you're suggesting that this somehow is setting in line a British constitutional crisis, I suggest you go look for UFOs. If you're suggesting something more sinister, I don't want to go there.

    Replies: @Alden

  8. @Thoughts
    It's stuff like this that should be publicized...not to hurt the girl...but to show the compassion of a police department

    Oh well

    Meghan's going after Kate, and Harry is not going to give up his place in the line of Succession which means Kate, Will and all three children are on the chopping block

    I don't know what the plan is from the power's that be...but it ain't looking good

    Replies: @HammerJack, @AndrewR, @Anon, @Paperback Writer

  9. Alt conspiracy theory: The royal family hired Markle to be a designated WWE-style villain to make themselves more popular by comparison. Even people who previously couldn’t stand Charles and/or Camilla have a new unfavorite.

    • Replies: @Thoughts
    @Patrick Sullivan

    I thought this for a decent amount of time

    Then I went to the Oprah facebook/instagram and began reading comments.

    Meghan May Win

    , @Alden
    @Patrick Sullivan

    Excellent point. Some say the entire marriage was timed to distract attention from the Queen’s favorite son Andrew and Epstein entanglement.

    Traditionally, the Queen whether sovereign or consort is Mrs goody goody. The King’s girl friend or sisters sisters in law are the bad girls.

    Same with the men. ER 2’s retard father was the good King. His brothers were the bad boys. ER 2 was always perfect. Princess Margaret was the bad girl. Dianna was Ms perfect. Duchess Sarah and Camilla were the bad girls. William was always the good boy, quiet and serious. Harry was designated the bad boy. Duchess Kate is sheer perfection. Ms Meghan is the bad girl. She was demanding about her wedding bad, bad girl!!. She wanted the church aired out bad bad American !!!

    One bit of criticism from the wedding. Meghan was told to pick a tiara to wear for the ceremony. So she picked one. The one with the big emeralds. Bad bad girl!!! She was forbidden to wear it because it was one of the Romanoff tiaras the English royals clandestinely acquired during the revolution. The tabloids made a big fuss about the fact Meghan picked a stolen one, not the fact that it was stolen.

    I have British relatives. As soon as the press noticed Meghan their first thought was “here we go again”. And it happened again. ER2 and Margaret Dianna and Sarah. As it’s happened many times over the centuries. Always a bad one to detract from the faults of the sovereign and the heir.

    They shouldn’t even be in England. Queen Victoria’s father was definitely not her mother’s second husband, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, son of George 3 and Queen Charlotte.

    Replies: @AndrewR

  10. @Redneck farmer
    But the Royals were mean to Meghan!

    Replies: @HammerJack

    I think they bent over backwards to be kind and welcoming to her, but she is a prima donna par excellence and refused to be pleased.

    She wanted them to be toadies and that’s a bridge too far for the House of Windsor.
    In revenge, she paints them all as racists because she knows that will do the most damage. Never mind she’s no blacker than millions of other white folks.

    https://nypost.com/2021/03/07/meghan-markle-reveals-he-true-self-in-oprah-interview-devine/

  11. It’s going to be great when the next baby Markle pops out resembles some immigrant player on the British World Cup soccer team (or whatever its called)

    For Harry, the irony will be lost, but it’ll be fun to see what happens next.

  12. @Thoughts
    It's stuff like this that should be publicized...not to hurt the girl...but to show the compassion of a police department

    Oh well

    Meghan's going after Kate, and Harry is not going to give up his place in the line of Succession which means Kate, Will and all three children are on the chopping block

    I don't know what the plan is from the power's that be...but it ain't looking good

    Replies: @HammerJack, @AndrewR, @Anon, @Paperback Writer

    William isn’t going to give up his place, and even if he did, making his kids give up their place due to one unpleasant incident involving their mother is too ludicrous to consider.

    As for our dweeb host, it’s really cringe that you’re playing dumb just to try to show how cool you are for not knowing basic things about the British royal family. You’re 62 years old but act like you’re 12.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @AndrewR

    I don't think that's what the commenter was saying - he was saying that this is a vicious assault on Kate's character. I think it'll fail, but it's created a massive problem for the RF because of Andy's shenanigans.

    Meghan is a complete slimeball.

  13. Set on fire by young males wearing Hawaiian t-shirts. I think I know who did it. It was Peter, Bobby, and Greg!

  14. @Jiminy
    I just heard on the tv that Harry is blaming this all starting because of their trip to Australia, and the fact that apparently we loved them to death, regardless of skin tone. So they went home sulking to Liz. Little did they know that it was a well thought out ploy on behalf of the republicans here to sabotage the monarchy.

    Replies: @Barnard

    The racism garbage could only have worked in the last 10 years. Even shortly before that someone would have been willing to put the question to them, “if Harry had married a white self absorbed, domineering American entertainer who had no respect for the monarchy or its customs traditions do you think she would have been treated any differently?” I have a feeling it won’t go well for Archie or his sister as adults when they try to pass themselves off as black and they are well under 10% Sub Saharan.

  15. I think it’s giving Princess Markle too much credit to think that her Tweet (or whatever it was) single handedly revived the media’s interest in Bernstein’s fake frat boy Nazis when it was beginning to fade. She (and Harry) are the opposite of original thinkers. The media continued with the story (for a while) because they felt that they could still wring some drops of Hate Whitey juice out of it, in a year in which Hate Whitey was the height of fashion and campaign strategy.

    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card (“the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned”) was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy – everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @Jack D


    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card (“the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned”) was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy – everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.
     
    The British Monarchy is certainly an anachronism - a proto-celebrity enterprise before the modern celebrity culture. Perhaps because the British Monarch is understood to have had only ceremonial powers* for some time the institution has survived while its counterparts which actually wielded State power were "relieved" of it in the modern era (notably royal cousins the Kaiser and the Czar). I suppose it remains as an institution binding the British people to their shared past. I doesn't mean much to me, but you can see how it means something to at least the vestigial remnant of the British people alive and aware before the era of mass immigration and diversity indoctrination.

    You can't convince me that this woman isn't a shrew who got Harry wrapped and set about to exploit her association with the Crown. I have a surmise that the plan is for her to go from the C-list to Kardashian level in a "famous for being famous" grift. Members of the Kardashian/Jenner circus made hundreds of millions of dollars for doing not much of anything, and I see this woman trying to parlay the (likely) self-generated Royal drama spiced up with race outrage into immense wealth in short order.

    *The play/BBC adaptation plays with the idea of Price Charles, having been coronated Charles III, withholding royal assent to a bill before Parliament and the aftermath of the act.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    , @Luzzatto
    @Jack D

    Meghan Markle's English son Archie is about as Black as English actor Stephen Graham who is a quarter Black and is consistently cast in roles playing Italian gangsters!
    https://youtu.be/dWq8UM9BDoo

    Replies: @Jack D

  16. Where darkies are, everything becomes &%$#)@

    Even darkies with historical culture. For instance:

    Denmark: population 5.8 million, Gross Domestic Product 356 billion $ US

    Pakistan: population 212 million, Gross Domestic product 315 billion $ US

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  17. The inner workings of British royalty are not our problem. We have been free of those leeches for over 200 years now.

    However, American obsession with British royalty is very lucrative for the Brits.

    Harry and Meghan have found a way to cash in big time. The contracts they signed are supposedly worth over $100 million. And they command fees of about $1 million for speaking or appearing or whatever.

    So much for the whining about being cut off from daddy’s Duchy of Cornwall money and grandma’s Duchy of Lancaster money and the Sovereign Trust money. They were getting about $6-7 million a year and some nice homes in England. Now they can make several times the money, work less, and have an even nicer home in LA.

    I am not disputing that Meghan was treated badly by the UK press. I am not disputing that at least some of it was racism. I am not disputing that life can be tough for royals. I am just saying Harry found a way to escape his gilded cage and make a fortune doing so.

    • Troll: TWS
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Paleo Liberal

    He might make even more money if he and Meghan became a porn stars. There are more things to life than making money. Sure money is important and the Queen is plenty rich but on her deathbed is she going to be thinking about how much money she made or about the service that she rendered to her people? Harry had the chance to serve his people (while at the same time making more money than 99% of Brits and enough to live a very luxurious lifestyle) and he rejected it for an American mulatta actress bimbo.

    Replies: @anon

  18. Meghan Markle is female. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s black(ish). Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s an actress. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    Harry is the spare heir who has been a mess since his teens, and whose brother is married to a stunning wife and has already produced two heirs of his own, which means Harry has almost zero chance of assuming the throne or attracting much attention unless he does something really raunchy, or something even raunchier, like what he’s doing now: marrying an attention whoring black actress and then accusing the queen and all his family of racism. So that’s what he’s doing, while making tens of millions for himself in the process. Gotta love this racist world.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @martin_2
    @Wilkey

    Three heirs.

    , @AnotherDad
    @Wilkey

    "Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested--at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible--by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an .... actress."

    Hall of fame "dad advice".

    Replies: @Neuday, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Boomthorkell

  19. Meghan Smollett.

    Careful. You maybe might get banned from twitter for using this.

    We should get this over with and analyze Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. I think Kanye’s only historical source of big cash money was selling concert tickets. There is a possibility that this business is defunct for the next year, maybe five, maybe forever. She married a dude with a big income and now that looks iffy so he’s gone. Usually divorce begins in the bedroom. With gold diggers divorce begins with opening the latest accountant’s statement.

  20. @Jack D
    I think it's giving Princess Markle too much credit to think that her Tweet (or whatever it was) single handedly revived the media's interest in Bernstein's fake frat boy Nazis when it was beginning to fade. She (and Harry) are the opposite of original thinkers. The media continued with the story (for a while) because they felt that they could still wring some drops of Hate Whitey juice out of it, in a year in which Hate Whitey was the height of fashion and campaign strategy.

    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card ("the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned") was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy - everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.

    Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Luzzatto

    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card (“the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned”) was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy – everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.

    The British Monarchy is certainly an anachronism – a proto-celebrity enterprise before the modern celebrity culture. Perhaps because the British Monarch is understood to have had only ceremonial powers* for some time the institution has survived while its counterparts which actually wielded State power were “relieved” of it in the modern era (notably royal cousins the Kaiser and the Czar). I suppose it remains as an institution binding the British people to their shared past. I doesn’t mean much to me, but you can see how it means something to at least the vestigial remnant of the British people alive and aware before the era of mass immigration and diversity indoctrination.

    You can’t convince me that this woman isn’t a shrew who got Harry wrapped and set about to exploit her association with the Crown. I have a surmise that the plan is for her to go from the C-list to Kardashian level in a “famous for being famous” grift. Members of the Kardashian/Jenner circus made hundreds of millions of dollars for doing not much of anything, and I see this woman trying to parlay the (likely) self-generated Royal drama spiced up with race outrage into immense wealth in short order.

    *The play/BBC adaptation plays with the idea of Price Charles, having been coronated Charles III, withholding royal assent to a bill before Parliament and the aftermath of the act.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Alec Leamas (hard at work)


    You can’t convince me that this woman isn’t a shrew who got Harry wrapped and set about to exploit her association with the Crown.
     
    Spot on BUT Harry was ripe for the picking. In 2008 he said he "hated" England.

    it means something to at least the vestigial remnant of the British people alive and aware before the era of mass immigration and diversity indoctrination.
     
    Also spot on, which of course is why the media must destroy it. They won't destroy the RF, but they might well destroy the Commonwealth.

    *The play/BBC adaptation plays with the idea of Price Charles, having been coronated Charles III, withholding royal assent to a bill before Parliament and the aftermath of the act.

     

    Are you referring to the play, *Charles III*? I saw it on TV in 2017/18 AM (After Meghan) and I was struck by the fact that the Harry character had a black actress girlfriend.

    Chronology: the play was produced in 2014 - so was written BM (Before Meghan - who Harry met in 2016, or so the story goes).

    The theater is a gossip-mill, so I am guessing that the theater world knew that Harry had a penchant for black actress/trollopes before she came onto the scene. Or that they were going out before it was announced in 2016, which amounts to the same thing.

  21. Isn’t Megan’s full name Megan Coburn-Saxe and Gotha? Secondly, if Athena was white, she would be arrested for making a false claim.

  22. Anon[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thoughts
    It's stuff like this that should be publicized...not to hurt the girl...but to show the compassion of a police department

    Oh well

    Meghan's going after Kate, and Harry is not going to give up his place in the line of Succession which means Kate, Will and all three children are on the chopping block

    I don't know what the plan is from the power's that be...but it ain't looking good

    Replies: @HammerJack, @AndrewR, @Anon, @Paperback Writer

    @ “ I don’t know what the plan is from the power’s that be…but it ain’t looking good“

    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point. Very careful editing by CBS. And the spinmeisters are at it today, further clobbering —by exclusion of Queen & Phillip— the future of the Monarchy, William, as racist. Notice it is on the word of good old Harry that the crucial knife was twisted in.

    The Monarchy is well and truly smeared as a high point in institutional racism. Notice also the ongoing attempt to topple Felipe VI and end Spain as an historical nation.

    Daniel Cohn Bendit, that bulwark of morals, while he reigned in the European Parliament, was quite frank about the necessity of doing away with nations.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Anon

    It's not a solid attempt at anything. It's pathetic scandalmongering on the part of two grifters.

    Guess what, Britain is 85% white. And 90% of them support the Royals. Oprah doesn't rule the UK.

    Britain's been attacked before and they survived. They'll survive again. In five years, when Harkle is divorced, when Meghan is in rehab, and Harry is a shell of himself, William and Kate will be in fine shape.

    Replies: @Anon

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Anon


    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point.
     
    In Marxian terms, history is repeating itself: Diana was the tragedy, Meghan is the farce.
  23. anon[161] • Disclaimer says:

    Princess Sparkel has pretty much everything she could want, and more, but it’s never enough. Never enough!

    Wow, who would have expected that from such a demure, self-effacing girly-girl as Meghan?

    If you just have to check out the interview with Oprah, turn that audio off. Use this instead.

  24. I fell asleep around three segments in. Did O ask about Althy?

    It’s sooo tiresome to see celebrities raising their profiles (rehabilitating their careers!) through cynical attachment to causes.

    [MORE]

    The royals are official promoters of Britain and its products. Had MM stuck to the script, she could have attached herself to upscale brands like Rolls Royce. Instead she chose to promote American political pop-culture.

    No celebrity draws attention to the plight of American school kids. The cause is just not glamorous enough.

  25. @Wilkey
    Meghan Markle is female. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s black(ish). Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s an actress. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    Harry is the spare heir who has been a mess since his teens, and whose brother is married to a stunning wife and has already produced two heirs of his own, which means Harry has almost zero chance of assuming the throne or attracting much attention unless he does something really raunchy, or something even raunchier, like what he’s doing now: marrying an attention whoring black actress and then accusing the queen and all his family of racism. So that’s what he’s doing, while making tens of millions for himself in the process. Gotta love this racist world.

    Replies: @martin_2, @AnotherDad

    Three heirs.

  26. @Wilkey
    Meghan Markle is female. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s black(ish). Which means she’s an attention whore.

    She’s an actress. Which means she’s an attention whore.

    Harry is the spare heir who has been a mess since his teens, and whose brother is married to a stunning wife and has already produced two heirs of his own, which means Harry has almost zero chance of assuming the throne or attracting much attention unless he does something really raunchy, or something even raunchier, like what he’s doing now: marrying an attention whoring black actress and then accusing the queen and all his family of racism. So that’s what he’s doing, while making tens of millions for himself in the process. Gotta love this racist world.

    Replies: @martin_2, @AnotherDad

    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • LOL: Ian Smith, AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Neuday
    @AnotherDad


    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.
     
    If you hated your "dad" and wanted to really shake up your royal family, he should've found some young Ukrainian lovely, married her and converted to Orthodox.

    Replies: @Philip Owen, @Alden

    , @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @AnotherDad



    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”
     
    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

     

    Well, if you presume a world in which Royals are permitted to carry on affairs discretely (or otherwise), it may have been a good play for the Monarchy to bring this woman into its orbit but not close enough to threaten succession after Kate twice did her duty. It increases the drama, makes the Monarchy more relatable to (regrettably) increasingly non-white Britain, and in so doing preserves the institution for another generation or two. Harry could have his own affairs for love while carrying on as a character in an ongoing reality show.

    It may just have been the case that Markle had her own agenda, in which rather than being the designated black sheep she would parlay her association with the Crown into Kardashian style fame and riches while wounding it badly in her divorce from it.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Reg Cæsar

    , @Boomthorkell
    @AnotherDad

    Honestly, I ponder at the actual ability of the (British) Royal Family to control itself. The theory to me with Aristocracies and Monarchies is that "the physical, intellectual and spiritual betters" are serving as leaders and role-models to the people below, the price of their power being the commensurate need to obey strict standards of behavior and noblesse oblige. This is only the theory, obviously, but really any sensible modern monarchy should be even more viciously strict and moralistic than before. Where was the public flogging of Prince And tapes for letting down his people by accepting bribery from an Israeli-American spy in the form of young sex slaves? Where were the entire staff of the monarchy in charge of keeping track of them when he was first even consorting with Epstein? What kind of education did these boys get?

    You're absolutely right about his Dad! What I'm wondering now is how they even let his Dad happen, or him happen, or any of this? It seems so damned counterproductive! What's the value of a monarchy or nobility, divinely selected to regulate and lead, who can't even regulate their own lives? How can they lead or serve as examples to the "lessers" of being better?

  27. Poor old Harry. It really is sad to see a nice guy (if naive) walking half in another world between lines of nameless guards to a certain and familiar doom.

    His mother gave the ill-advised interview to Martin Bashir which sundered relations between her and the rest of the Royal Family, and it turned out she and her brother were duped by fake documents purporting to show that one of her staff was spying on her, paid to do so by the Royal Family. It wasn’t true but it got the interview.

    Now he’s doing the same, urged on by the mother of his children.

    I haven’t watched the interview and probably won’t, but did he get a word in edgeways other than when supporting his wife’s story?

  28. anon[378] • Disclaimer says:

    I read that Meghan Markle violated the British Royal family’s motto:

    Never complain, never explain.

    That’s why the (((media))) despises the British Royal Family, because that’s all Jews do: complain and explain!

    Have you ever met a non-complaining/explaining Jew? Kevin MacDonald even wrote a whole book about it, called The Culture of Critique. Stoicism and Jews+blacks is like fire and water. If everyone is as stoic as the royal family, these drama kings and queens would have nothing to report/scream about.

    No wonder they are doing everything they can to help tear down that family. Meghan and Harry, the empty headed attention seekers that they are, are happily allowing themselves to be used as long as they get any attention. At least she has an excuse: she’s lived her whole adult life in front of a camera and doesn’t know when to stop acting. What’s his excuse? That he inherited his mother’s IQ while William inherited the good looks?

    The Royal Family’s stoicism is the definition of class, something the media and these two bimbos don’t know if it hits them in the face.

  29. One of the”royals” wondered how dark Archy would be……..not unreasonable under the circumstances.

  30. The eye-rolling clips from the Meghan-Oprah Summit are the pitch-perfect swill in which to wallow on International Day of the Wimmins.

  31. @The Alarmist
    Interestingly, Harry is just dumb enough to make this marriage last after Meghan has milked the relationship and race racket for every last dime, at which point Harry will have to go hat in hand back to London a’beggin for support, just like his feckless forbear, the Duke of Windsor.

    If Her Majesty had any sense of humour left, she’d revoke the Sussex title and bestow the Windsor title to make a point.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Paperback Writer, @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    The problem is Andrew. He’s a creep, and the lack of equity in revoking the one title while keeping his would be glaring.

    I wish that “dearieme” would comment.

  32. @The Alarmist
    Interestingly, Harry is just dumb enough to make this marriage last after Meghan has milked the relationship and race racket for every last dime, at which point Harry will have to go hat in hand back to London a’beggin for support, just like his feckless forbear, the Duke of Windsor.

    If Her Majesty had any sense of humour left, she’d revoke the Sussex title and bestow the Windsor title to make a point.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Paperback Writer, @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    The problem is Andrew. He’s a creep, and the lack of equity in revoking the one title while keeping his would be glaring.

    I wish that “dearieme” would comment.

    • Replies: @Curle
    @Paperback Writer

    Remind me, was the accuser against Andrew beyond age of consent or not?

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

  33. @Thoughts
    It's stuff like this that should be publicized...not to hurt the girl...but to show the compassion of a police department

    Oh well

    Meghan's going after Kate, and Harry is not going to give up his place in the line of Succession which means Kate, Will and all three children are on the chopping block

    I don't know what the plan is from the power's that be...but it ain't looking good

    Replies: @HammerJack, @AndrewR, @Anon, @Paperback Writer

    Meghan’s going after Kate

    Very insightful. You hit the nail on the head. Meghan has a deadly hate for William’s wife – the future Queen of England.

    This all may sound stupid but it’s not. Meghan is trying to destroy the BRF using racial animus and wokeness in the US, which has its fans in the UK. She won’t succeed but it won’t end well.

  34. @AnotherDad
    @Wilkey

    "Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested--at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible--by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an .... actress."

    Hall of fame "dad advice".

    Replies: @Neuday, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Boomthorkell

    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

    If you hated your “dad” and wanted to really shake up your royal family, he should’ve found some young Ukrainian lovely, married her and converted to Orthodox.

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @Neuday

    Philip, a member of the Greek royal family was originally orthodox and still attends orthodox services. He used to go Mt Athos every year SFAIR.

    , @Alden
    @Neuday

    Prince Charles is alleged to be in a state of despair. The various royal households have been in crisis meetings all day Monday after the show. What a joke.

  35. Anonymous[234] • Disclaimer says:

    On October 1, the Madison Police and the Department of Justice quietly announced there was no evidence that the crime alleged by Ms. Bernstein ever happened and they were closing the case.

    To be a bit more accurate, MPD made public an unambiguous evidence that the crime, as told by the girl, has never happened (so, there is evidence of absence). But, lying to police is OK if you are half black.

  36. @AnotherDad
    @Wilkey

    "Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested--at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible--by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an .... actress."

    Hall of fame "dad advice".

    Replies: @Neuday, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Boomthorkell

    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

    Well, if you presume a world in which Royals are permitted to carry on affairs discretely (or otherwise), it may have been a good play for the Monarchy to bring this woman into its orbit but not close enough to threaten succession after Kate twice did her duty. It increases the drama, makes the Monarchy more relatable to (regrettably) increasingly non-white Britain, and in so doing preserves the institution for another generation or two. Harry could have his own affairs for love while carrying on as a character in an ongoing reality show.

    It may just have been the case that Markle had her own agenda, in which rather than being the designated black sheep she would parlay her association with the Crown into Kardashian style fame and riches while wounding it badly in her divorce from it.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    Harry worships Meghan, sadly. This is no act.

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Alec Leamas (hard at work)


    ...after Kate twice did her duty.
     
    Thrice.
  37. @Paleo Liberal
    The inner workings of British royalty are not our problem. We have been free of those leeches for over 200 years now.

    However, American obsession with British royalty is very lucrative for the Brits.

    Harry and Meghan have found a way to cash in big time. The contracts they signed are supposedly worth over $100 million. And they command fees of about $1 million for speaking or appearing or whatever.

    So much for the whining about being cut off from daddy’s Duchy of Cornwall money and grandma’s Duchy of Lancaster money and the Sovereign Trust money. They were getting about $6-7 million a year and some nice homes in England. Now they can make several times the money, work less, and have an even nicer home in LA.

    I am not disputing that Meghan was treated badly by the UK press. I am not disputing that at least some of it was racism. I am not disputing that life can be tough for royals. I am just saying Harry found a way to escape his gilded cage and make a fortune doing so.

    Replies: @Jack D

    He might make even more money if he and Meghan became a porn stars. There are more things to life than making money. Sure money is important and the Queen is plenty rich but on her deathbed is she going to be thinking about how much money she made or about the service that she rendered to her people? Harry had the chance to serve his people (while at the same time making more money than 99% of Brits and enough to live a very luxurious lifestyle) and he rejected it for an American mulatta actress bimbo.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Jack D

    He might make even more money if he and Meghan became a porn stars.

    Nah. Too much competition, plus Princess Sparkel is frankly not young enough anymore. Notice that nobody's leaked any new sex vids featuring Paris Hilton? There's a reason for that.

  38. Serena wants us to know that she feels her pal Meg’s pain:

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/03/08/serena-williams-says-the-pain-is-real-proud-of-meghan-markel-for-interview/

    I guess two decades of steroid cheating your way through women’s tennis to an 8-figure net worth just isn’t what it used to be.

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
  39. Would anyone pay the slightest attention to Harry & Meghan if she were not partly negro?

    Also, always a bad sign for a marriage when pop culture starts referring to the couple by first names and ampersand? E.g. “Brad & Jen or for you ancients, “Liz and Dick.” Seems like that is a harbinger of doom.

    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
    @Muggles

    They paid a lot of attention to Fergie and she is white.

    As for actresses, quite a bit of attention was paid to Grace Kelly, also white. Yes, I know, Grace Kelly was an actual star, and not a C list celebrity.

    And the attention is a double edged sword. The racism Meghan Markle faced is a fraction of the racism Yoko Ono faced 50 years earlier, but still real.

    And no one would care about Harry if he weren’t the child of the Prince of Wales.

    These are basically nobodies except for an archaic institution we had the wisdom to discard almost 250 years ago.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Curle

  40. @Jack D
    @Paleo Liberal

    He might make even more money if he and Meghan became a porn stars. There are more things to life than making money. Sure money is important and the Queen is plenty rich but on her deathbed is she going to be thinking about how much money she made or about the service that she rendered to her people? Harry had the chance to serve his people (while at the same time making more money than 99% of Brits and enough to live a very luxurious lifestyle) and he rejected it for an American mulatta actress bimbo.

    Replies: @anon

    He might make even more money if he and Meghan became a porn stars.

    Nah. Too much competition, plus Princess Sparkel is frankly not young enough anymore. Notice that nobody’s leaked any new sex vids featuring Paris Hilton? There’s a reason for that.

  41. @Muggles
    Would anyone pay the slightest attention to Harry & Meghan if she were not partly negro?

    Also, always a bad sign for a marriage when pop culture starts referring to the couple by first names and ampersand? E.g. "Brad & Jen or for you ancients, "Liz and Dick." Seems like that is a harbinger of doom.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal

    They paid a lot of attention to Fergie and she is white.

    As for actresses, quite a bit of attention was paid to Grace Kelly, also white. Yes, I know, Grace Kelly was an actual star, and not a C list celebrity.

    And the attention is a double edged sword. The racism Meghan Markle faced is a fraction of the racism Yoko Ono faced 50 years earlier, but still real.

    And no one would care about Harry if he weren’t the child of the Prince of Wales.

    These are basically nobodies except for an archaic institution we had the wisdom to discard almost 250 years ago.

    • Agree: JMcG
    • Replies: @Muggles
    @Paleo Liberal

    Yes, "Fergie" but she at the time was something of a path breaker for being so "out there." Yes, the Brit royals always get a lot of attention (that's why they still have them) but even so Fergie eventually got the boot or left (who remembers?) Oprah isn't calling...

    Grace Kelly not only was an A lister celeb but married an actual ruling Prince of a small glamorous Riviera principality. He had real albeit minor political power.

    Yes, Yoko's critics probably did use her race against her but that was hardly much. Mostly it was her weird music and outspoken political/cultural ideas and behavior. She was really an artist of some merit (not my taste) and let's face it, John Lennon was more of a celeb that Harry.

    By contrast Meghan has to play up her racism since it hardly existed. Also true that Harry and the rest would be obscure unknowns were it not for the British monarchy roles. But the UK and Europe (and elsewhere) is full of minor sons (and daughters) of real royals who receive almost no attention. Oprah wouldn't be paid $7 million to softball interview any of them, unless they were accused of murder or something.

    It is mostly a female thing, this entire "royal" worship. Little girls grow up wanting to be "real princesses" like they dress up for at Halloween or birthdays. Boys don't aspire to be kings or princes (not in the US anyway) since in modern times they are indistinguishable from their own papas or grandpas. What real boy wants to become Prince Charles?

    , @Curle
    @Paleo Liberal

    Yoko broke up a home and provided an incentive for John to leave his working class wife and her child to take up with the spawn of one of the world’s most powerful dynasties. Even McCartney’s wife, daughter of an Wall Streeter, was nothing in the status hierarchy compared to Yoko.

    Don’t expend too many tears over Yoko. Rest assured she could have cared less what a bunch of resentful prole British women thought of her. Her g-grandfather was the founder of this zaibatsu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasuda_zaibatsu

  42. @Paleo Liberal
    @Muggles

    They paid a lot of attention to Fergie and she is white.

    As for actresses, quite a bit of attention was paid to Grace Kelly, also white. Yes, I know, Grace Kelly was an actual star, and not a C list celebrity.

    And the attention is a double edged sword. The racism Meghan Markle faced is a fraction of the racism Yoko Ono faced 50 years earlier, but still real.

    And no one would care about Harry if he weren’t the child of the Prince of Wales.

    These are basically nobodies except for an archaic institution we had the wisdom to discard almost 250 years ago.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Curle

    Yes, “Fergie” but she at the time was something of a path breaker for being so “out there.” Yes, the Brit royals always get a lot of attention (that’s why they still have them) but even so Fergie eventually got the boot or left (who remembers?) Oprah isn’t calling…

    Grace Kelly not only was an A lister celeb but married an actual ruling Prince of a small glamorous Riviera principality. He had real albeit minor political power.

    Yes, Yoko’s critics probably did use her race against her but that was hardly much. Mostly it was her weird music and outspoken political/cultural ideas and behavior. She was really an artist of some merit (not my taste) and let’s face it, John Lennon was more of a celeb that Harry.

    By contrast Meghan has to play up her racism since it hardly existed. Also true that Harry and the rest would be obscure unknowns were it not for the British monarchy roles. But the UK and Europe (and elsewhere) is full of minor sons (and daughters) of real royals who receive almost no attention. Oprah wouldn’t be paid $7 million to softball interview any of them, unless they were accused of murder or something.

    It is mostly a female thing, this entire “royal” worship. Little girls grow up wanting to be “real princesses” like they dress up for at Halloween or birthdays. Boys don’t aspire to be kings or princes (not in the US anyway) since in modern times they are indistinguishable from their own papas or grandpas. What real boy wants to become Prince Charles?

  43. @Jack D
    I think it's giving Princess Markle too much credit to think that her Tweet (or whatever it was) single handedly revived the media's interest in Bernstein's fake frat boy Nazis when it was beginning to fade. She (and Harry) are the opposite of original thinkers. The media continued with the story (for a while) because they felt that they could still wring some drops of Hate Whitey juice out of it, in a year in which Hate Whitey was the height of fashion and campaign strategy.

    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card ("the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned") was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy - everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.

    Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Luzzatto

    Meghan Markle’s English son Archie is about as Black as English actor Stephen Graham who is a quarter Black and is consistently cast in roles playing Italian gangsters!

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Luzzatto

    So are you suggesting that (Southern) Italians are 1/4 melanzan?

  44. Meghan Markle is lying when she claims that she has experienced Anti-Black racism her entire life. Before Meghan Markle got with Prince Harry and she was just an actress on a USA Network show called Suits, she used to say in interviews that growing up people thought her Black mother was her nanny because they thought she was White. The 2 scenerios are mutually exclusive from each other and only 1 can be true they can not both be true at the same time. If growing up people thought you looked White there is no way you experienced Anti-Black racism!

  45. @Neuday
    @AnotherDad


    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.
     
    If you hated your "dad" and wanted to really shake up your royal family, he should've found some young Ukrainian lovely, married her and converted to Orthodox.

    Replies: @Philip Owen, @Alden

    Philip, a member of the Greek royal family was originally orthodox and still attends orthodox services. He used to go Mt Athos every year SFAIR.

  46. Now that the Trump family is out of the limelight, the media needs another WASP family to lynch, might as well go after the WASPiest of them all, the British Royal Family.

    • Agree: Alden
  47. @Luzzatto
    @Jack D

    Meghan Markle's English son Archie is about as Black as English actor Stephen Graham who is a quarter Black and is consistently cast in roles playing Italian gangsters!
    https://youtu.be/dWq8UM9BDoo

    Replies: @Jack D

    So are you suggesting that (Southern) Italians are 1/4 melanzan?

  48. @Patrick Sullivan
    Alt conspiracy theory: The royal family hired Markle to be a designated WWE-style villain to make themselves more popular by comparison. Even people who previously couldn't stand Charles and/or Camilla have a new unfavorite.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Alden

    I thought this for a decent amount of time

    Then I went to the Oprah facebook/instagram and began reading comments.

    Meghan May Win

  49. @The Alarmist
    Interestingly, Harry is just dumb enough to make this marriage last after Meghan has milked the relationship and race racket for every last dime, at which point Harry will have to go hat in hand back to London a’beggin for support, just like his feckless forbear, the Duke of Windsor.

    If Her Majesty had any sense of humour left, she’d revoke the Sussex title and bestow the Windsor title to make a point.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Paperback Writer, @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    The Duke of Windsor never went back to London begging for support. He took a massive inheritance with him when he left. The retard younger brother King George was forbidden by his handlers to let Windsor back in the country.

    The UK royal family is a joke. The Queens only real position is head of the Commonwealth. Look at the pictures during the commonwealth conferences aka cannibals and cleptomaniacs convention . The Queen and PM the only Whites lost in a group of the most bloodthirsty blackest most corrupt kleptomaniacs on earth. They spend half their time in Africa posing with black 5 year olds and the rest chasing every liberal environmentalist leftist cause around.

    Their entertainment value is getting old.

    There’s a great show on Netflix. The Windsors Mean spirited and vulgar. Best show ever about the royal family. Too bad it didn’t feature Prince Andrews real father. Harry’s not the only bastard in the family.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Alden


    The Queen and PM the only Whites lost in a group of the most bloodthirsty blackest most corrupt kleptomaniacs on earth.
     
    In other words, an everyday mealtime on the plantation.


    https://birminghamwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Scan-38-300x204.jpg
  50. @Thoughts
    @The Alarmist

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    The only question is...is he evil enough to steal his brother's birthright or worse?

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @Wilkey, @Paperback Writer

    It’s a secret plan to re-unite the US and UK under a Meghan Presidency and a Harry Monarchy 😉

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @The Alarmist

    Yeah, it sounds like an update to Cecil Rhodes' plan to finance in his will a secret society to ensure British Empire dominance forever by reuniting the USA into the UK thru covert machinations.

    Replies: @Rockford Tyson

    , @Abolish_public_education
    @The Alarmist

    The American Revolution was a huge mistake (for the colonies); but all revolutions disappoint.

    If UK offers us the same deal as the one we had under that “tyrant” KG3, we’d be fools to refuse.

    As for the Sussexes, I think a naturalized US, Californian Harry will have a successful career in US politics; he’d have been a shoe-in to knock-off Newsom later this year.

    A “power couple” of the Arnold-Maria variety.

    Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda.
    John Warner and Liz Taylor (nah).

  51. I really don’t pay attention to the royal crap but it provided the only break from the 24/7 Covid shit and I haven’t watched TV for over a decade so the only snippet I got was on a radio news channel as I was waking up to the alarm. Surprisingly the female host called bullshit on Sparkle Markle saying that she really didn’t know anything about Harry, the British Royalty etc etc.. but for what he told her in their deep personal conversations.

    So while every white trash hookup has both sides checking out their latest sweetie on Google, this career minded actress, dating a prince doesn’t even check Google on her world famous beau, Princess Di and the British Royalty? Apparently her own mother had only a passing knowledge of the late “England’s Rose”. Let me rush out any buy the latest “Oprah Approved” book. Mind blowing that they can get away with this but then consider the audience.

    Prince Harry is a sheltered idiot and hence a simple rabbit for a professional she-wolf whore. He didn’t stand a chance. In her cunning she waited to fart out Archie before she made her serious moves and now she is set for life with a stage that an average ‘C’ actress couldn’t even dream of.

    My only real curiosity would be to have a true transcript of conversations that Phil, Prince of Greece and Denmark would have had with Betty Battenberg HRH when news first would have reached them about the appearance of Farkle. They would know about the tenuous state that the institution of the monarchy was in, the dreadful power of wokism/racism etc. Would they have sanctioned the union knowing that Hewitt Jr. would never wear the crown and that this could be a pressure release for the ‘mob’. Would the phrase “bloody idiot, just like his mother” have been spoken. Or is this a situation much like taking the Covid Jab to fix the immediate problem only to find out that the third or fourth mutation would become a death sentence?

    Happy International Women’s Day! Take a whore to lunch. Oh, sorry no restaurants….

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Timur The Lame

    Once a member of the royal family reaches the age of 25, they don’t need permission of the sovereign to marry. ER2, not Phillip is the sovereign so only her consent is needed for a royal under the age of 25 to marry.

    Unless a royal of any age marries a catholic. Then that royal must formally give up all rights of succession for themselves and their children.
    Or just have a civil or Catholic wedding.

  52. @Patrick Sullivan
    Alt conspiracy theory: The royal family hired Markle to be a designated WWE-style villain to make themselves more popular by comparison. Even people who previously couldn't stand Charles and/or Camilla have a new unfavorite.

    Replies: @Thoughts, @Alden

    Excellent point. Some say the entire marriage was timed to distract attention from the Queen’s favorite son Andrew and Epstein entanglement.

    Traditionally, the Queen whether sovereign or consort is Mrs goody goody. The King’s girl friend or sisters sisters in law are the bad girls.

    Same with the men. ER 2’s retard father was the good King. His brothers were the bad boys. ER 2 was always perfect. Princess Margaret was the bad girl. Dianna was Ms perfect. Duchess Sarah and Camilla were the bad girls. William was always the good boy, quiet and serious. Harry was designated the bad boy. Duchess Kate is sheer perfection. Ms Meghan is the bad girl. She was demanding about her wedding bad, bad girl!!. She wanted the church aired out bad bad American !!!

    One bit of criticism from the wedding. Meghan was told to pick a tiara to wear for the ceremony. So she picked one. The one with the big emeralds. Bad bad girl!!! She was forbidden to wear it because it was one of the Romanoff tiaras the English royals clandestinely acquired during the revolution. The tabloids made a big fuss about the fact Meghan picked a stolen one, not the fact that it was stolen.

    I have British relatives. As soon as the press noticed Meghan their first thought was “here we go again”. And it happened again. ER2 and Margaret Dianna and Sarah. As it’s happened many times over the centuries. Always a bad one to detract from the faults of the sovereign and the heir.

    They shouldn’t even be in England. Queen Victoria’s father was definitely not her mother’s second husband, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, son of George 3 and Queen Charlotte.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Alden

    I'm sure that, between DNA testing and all the descendents Victoria has, we would know by now if she was a bastard. Her father never seem to suspect so.

    Replies: @Alden

  53. @AnotherDad
    @Wilkey

    "Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested--at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible--by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an .... actress."

    Hall of fame "dad advice".

    Replies: @Neuday, @Alec Leamas (hard at work), @Boomthorkell

    Honestly, I ponder at the actual ability of the (British) Royal Family to control itself. The theory to me with Aristocracies and Monarchies is that “the physical, intellectual and spiritual betters” are serving as leaders and role-models to the people below, the price of their power being the commensurate need to obey strict standards of behavior and noblesse oblige. This is only the theory, obviously, but really any sensible modern monarchy should be even more viciously strict and moralistic than before. Where was the public flogging of Prince And tapes for letting down his people by accepting bribery from an Israeli-American spy in the form of young sex slaves? Where were the entire staff of the monarchy in charge of keeping track of them when he was first even consorting with Epstein? What kind of education did these boys get?

    You’re absolutely right about his Dad! What I’m wondering now is how they even let his Dad happen, or him happen, or any of this? It seems so damned counterproductive! What’s the value of a monarchy or nobility, divinely selected to regulate and lead, who can’t even regulate their own lives? How can they lead or serve as examples to the “lessers” of being better?

  54. @Neuday
    @AnotherDad


    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”

    Hall of fame “dad advice”.
     
    If you hated your "dad" and wanted to really shake up your royal family, he should've found some young Ukrainian lovely, married her and converted to Orthodox.

    Replies: @Philip Owen, @Alden

    Prince Charles is alleged to be in a state of despair. The various royal households have been in crisis meetings all day Monday after the show. What a joke.

  55. @The Alarmist
    @Thoughts

    It’s a secret plan to re-unite the US and UK under a Meghan Presidency and a Harry Monarchy ;)

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Abolish_public_education

    Yeah, it sounds like an update to Cecil Rhodes’ plan to finance in his will a secret society to ensure British Empire dominance forever by reuniting the USA into the UK thru covert machinations.

    • Replies: @Rockford Tyson
    @Steve Sailer

    There are Canadians that to do this day despise Americans for having told King George to take a hike. In fact, one of the reasons why Canada accepted so many American Vietnam War deserters is because they didn't consider them to be deserters at all, as America is an illegal country that shouldn't even exist.

    My father told me that, whe he was a little kid back in the 1950's, his dad had a Canadian friend who was into his nineties, and he refused to shake hands or talk to Americans as he considers them traitors to the Crown. Needless to say, my grandfather was not American. Every time this elderly Canadian gentleman met an American, he would put his hands behind his back and turn his back on the American in contempt.

    Oddly, he said that this man considered Brazil the only legitimatedly independent country of the Americas, as the country was separated from Portugal by decree of the King Himself. Thus, it has a legitimate moral ground as an indepent country. All other country of the Americas are the result of "traitorous revolutions against their Kings, who were appointed by God."

    This elderly gentleman was a member of the Church of England, and he considered America's War of Independence worse than treason, but blasphemy. Because the King is appointed by God, and Men have no right to reject their King, unless the King committed sacrilege, which was not the case with King George.

    Replies: @Not Only Wrathful

  56. @Luzzatto
    I read in the gossip tabloids that Meghan Markle hated the weather in London because she thinks it's way too cold there. No wonder she wanted to get the hell out of London ASAP and move back to Los Angeles. Meghan Markle wants to live and die in L.A, it's the only place for her!
    https://youtu.be/Wz2wVLyTar4

    Replies: @profnasty, @Alden

    The first TwoPac song I’ve heard.
    With any luck….

  57. anonymous[310] • Disclaimer says:

    A baby gender reveal?! How dare Megain & Harry say the gender without first having asked the child!

  58. @The Alarmist
    @Thoughts

    It’s a secret plan to re-unite the US and UK under a Meghan Presidency and a Harry Monarchy ;)

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Abolish_public_education

    The American Revolution was a huge mistake (for the colonies); but all revolutions disappoint.

    If UK offers us the same deal as the one we had under that “tyrant” KG3, we’d be fools to refuse.

    As for the Sussexes, I think a naturalized US, Californian Harry will have a successful career in US politics; he’d have been a shoe-in to knock-off Newsom later this year.

    A “power couple” of the Arnold-Maria variety.

    Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda.
    John Warner and Liz Taylor (nah).

  59. @Anon
    @Thoughts

    @ “ I don’t know what the plan is from the power’s that be…but it ain’t looking good“

    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point. Very careful editing by CBS. And the spinmeisters are at it today, further clobbering —by exclusion of Queen & Phillip— the future of the Monarchy, William, as racist. Notice it is on the word of good old Harry that the crucial knife was twisted in.

    The Monarchy is well and truly smeared as a high point in institutional racism. Notice also the ongoing attempt to topple Felipe VI and end Spain as an historical nation.

    Daniel Cohn Bendit, that bulwark of morals, while he reigned in the European Parliament, was quite frank about the necessity of doing away with nations.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Reg Cæsar

    It’s not a solid attempt at anything. It’s pathetic scandalmongering on the part of two grifters.

    Guess what, Britain is 85% white. And 90% of them support the Royals. Oprah doesn’t rule the UK.

    Britain’s been attacked before and they survived. They’ll survive again. In five years, when Harkle is divorced, when Meghan is in rehab, and Harry is a shell of himself, William and Kate will be in fine shape.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Paperback Writer

    I hope your right. But “the narrative” against an historical institution is not built overnight. It’s built incrementally, to be leveraged until it topples. Regime change is part of the cultural wars.

    A farce, but a useful farce. Oprah did careful editing to maximize damage.

  60. @AndrewR
    @Thoughts

    William isn't going to give up his place, and even if he did, making his kids give up their place due to one unpleasant incident involving their mother is too ludicrous to consider.

    As for our dweeb host, it's really cringe that you're playing dumb just to try to show how cool you are for not knowing basic things about the British royal family. You're 62 years old but act like you're 12.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    I don’t think that’s what the commenter was saying – he was saying that this is a vicious assault on Kate’s character. I think it’ll fail, but it’s created a massive problem for the RF because of Andy’s shenanigans.

    Meghan is a complete slimeball.

  61. @Paperback Writer
    @The Alarmist

    The problem is Andrew. He's a creep, and the lack of equity in revoking the one title while keeping his would be glaring.

    I wish that "dearieme" would comment.

    Replies: @Curle

    Remind me, was the accuser against Andrew beyond age of consent or not?

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Curle

    You could look it up.

    Replies: @Curle

  62. @Paleo Liberal
    @Muggles

    They paid a lot of attention to Fergie and she is white.

    As for actresses, quite a bit of attention was paid to Grace Kelly, also white. Yes, I know, Grace Kelly was an actual star, and not a C list celebrity.

    And the attention is a double edged sword. The racism Meghan Markle faced is a fraction of the racism Yoko Ono faced 50 years earlier, but still real.

    And no one would care about Harry if he weren’t the child of the Prince of Wales.

    These are basically nobodies except for an archaic institution we had the wisdom to discard almost 250 years ago.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Curle

    Yoko broke up a home and provided an incentive for John to leave his working class wife and her child to take up with the spawn of one of the world’s most powerful dynasties. Even McCartney’s wife, daughter of an Wall Streeter, was nothing in the status hierarchy compared to Yoko.

    Don’t expend too many tears over Yoko. Rest assured she could have cared less what a bunch of resentful prole British women thought of her. Her g-grandfather was the founder of this zaibatsu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasuda_zaibatsu

  63. @Curle
    @Paperback Writer

    Remind me, was the accuser against Andrew beyond age of consent or not?

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    You could look it up.

    • Replies: @Curle
    @Paperback Writer

    She was one year past British age of consent.

    Creep or not, one of the more distinctive features of the hit on Andrew was the accuser’s, and her handler’s, very disciplined messaging. No matter how heart rendering the tale, never did they let slip the girl’s age sufficient to establish she’d reached sexual majority at the time of the event. They were good about eliding past such ‘little’ details. Sufficiently so that I deduced that, at least as far as her team were concerned, their use of Andrew was opportunistic. They wanted the RF to create leverage under Epstein’s team to pay off the girl. I presume they understood Epstein to be a state actor.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Alden

  64. @Curle
    @Paleo Liberal

    Yoko broke up a home and provided an incentive for John to leave his working class wife and her child to take up with the spawn of one of the world’s most powerful dynasties. Even McCartney’s wife, daughter of an Wall Streeter, was nothing in the status hierarchy compared to Yoko.

    Don’t expend too many tears over Yoko. Rest assured she could have cared less what a bunch of resentful prole British women thought of her. Her g-grandfather was the founder of this zaibatsu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasuda_zaibatsu

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    Yoko broke up a home and provided an incentive for John to leave his working class wife and her child to take up with the spawn of one of the world’s most powerful dynasties. Even McCartney’s wife, daughter of an Wall Streeter, was nothing in the status hierarchy compared to Yoko.

    I despise Yoko. She was and is a vulture & a talentless hack with no artistic talent whatever. Numerous sources have painted her as repulsive.

    But – she broke up nothing. John was messed up and his marriage to Cynthia was a sham. Cynthia was middle class, not working class, a distinct step up from John, who was fake middle class.

    She was a lovely woman whose son has devotedly rehabilitated her name. She did a good job by Julian. And although the divorce was a trauma, in the long run she was well out of that madness. She struggled financially after she was discarded by John because he was a cheap selfish MF, not because Yoko had him in her grasp. Like sticks to like.

  65. @Alden
    @Patrick Sullivan

    Excellent point. Some say the entire marriage was timed to distract attention from the Queen’s favorite son Andrew and Epstein entanglement.

    Traditionally, the Queen whether sovereign or consort is Mrs goody goody. The King’s girl friend or sisters sisters in law are the bad girls.

    Same with the men. ER 2’s retard father was the good King. His brothers were the bad boys. ER 2 was always perfect. Princess Margaret was the bad girl. Dianna was Ms perfect. Duchess Sarah and Camilla were the bad girls. William was always the good boy, quiet and serious. Harry was designated the bad boy. Duchess Kate is sheer perfection. Ms Meghan is the bad girl. She was demanding about her wedding bad, bad girl!!. She wanted the church aired out bad bad American !!!

    One bit of criticism from the wedding. Meghan was told to pick a tiara to wear for the ceremony. So she picked one. The one with the big emeralds. Bad bad girl!!! She was forbidden to wear it because it was one of the Romanoff tiaras the English royals clandestinely acquired during the revolution. The tabloids made a big fuss about the fact Meghan picked a stolen one, not the fact that it was stolen.

    I have British relatives. As soon as the press noticed Meghan their first thought was “here we go again”. And it happened again. ER2 and Margaret Dianna and Sarah. As it’s happened many times over the centuries. Always a bad one to detract from the faults of the sovereign and the heir.

    They shouldn’t even be in England. Queen Victoria’s father was definitely not her mother’s second husband, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, son of George 3 and Queen Charlotte.

    Replies: @AndrewR

    I’m sure that, between DNA testing and all the descendents Victoria has, we would know by now if she was a bastard. Her father never seem to suspect so.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @AndrewR

    It was well known among TPTB at the time. Her mother’s husband having lived with a woman more than 20 years and never produced a child. That woman did have one child by a previous relationship. Then within months of the marriage wife pregnant with Victoria.

    By the time she was 12 or 13, Victoria’s height was one cause for suspicion. Barring severe childhood malnutrition or growth plate injuries it’s really not possible for a 5’9 man and 5’3 woman to produce a daughter who was about 4’10-11 at adulthood.

    Then there’s the hemophilia. Passed from grandfather to grandsons through his daughter to the grandsons. No trace of hemophilia in either Victoria’s mother or her legal father, Prince Edward Duke of Kent son of George 3 and his Queen Charlotte’s families as far back as the records went.

    But who cared? The UK needed a legitimate heir and Victoria’s mother produced one.

    DNA’s only been around the past 30 years. You think the royals are going to dig up George 3 and Charlotte’s bones, do a DNA test and announce to the world that they’re not descendants of George 3 and Queen Charlotte?

    They won’t even do a DNA test of the bones that could be the remains of Edward 4 and his brother Richard. Or any other remains that are definitely royal ancestors.

    It’s all very entertaining and enjoyable. Plus, it keeps the UK newspaper industry going. TPTB needed an heir and got one.

    Replies: @AndrewR

  66. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @AnotherDad



    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”
     
    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

     

    Well, if you presume a world in which Royals are permitted to carry on affairs discretely (or otherwise), it may have been a good play for the Monarchy to bring this woman into its orbit but not close enough to threaten succession after Kate twice did her duty. It increases the drama, makes the Monarchy more relatable to (regrettably) increasingly non-white Britain, and in so doing preserves the institution for another generation or two. Harry could have his own affairs for love while carrying on as a character in an ongoing reality show.

    It may just have been the case that Markle had her own agenda, in which rather than being the designated black sheep she would parlay her association with the Crown into Kardashian style fame and riches while wounding it badly in her divorce from it.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Reg Cæsar

    Harry worships Meghan, sadly. This is no act.

  67. @Anon
    @Thoughts

    @ “ I don’t know what the plan is from the power’s that be…but it ain’t looking good“

    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point. Very careful editing by CBS. And the spinmeisters are at it today, further clobbering —by exclusion of Queen & Phillip— the future of the Monarchy, William, as racist. Notice it is on the word of good old Harry that the crucial knife was twisted in.

    The Monarchy is well and truly smeared as a high point in institutional racism. Notice also the ongoing attempt to topple Felipe VI and end Spain as an historical nation.

    Daniel Cohn Bendit, that bulwark of morals, while he reigned in the European Parliament, was quite frank about the necessity of doing away with nations.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Reg Cæsar

    Nope. It is a very solid attempt at flipping the narrative against the Royals, point-by-point.

    In Marxian terms, history is repeating itself: Diana was the tragedy, Meghan is the farce.

  68. @Paperback Writer
    @Curle

    You could look it up.

    Replies: @Curle

    She was one year past British age of consent.

    Creep or not, one of the more distinctive features of the hit on Andrew was the accuser’s, and her handler’s, very disciplined messaging. No matter how heart rendering the tale, never did they let slip the girl’s age sufficient to establish she’d reached sexual majority at the time of the event. They were good about eliding past such ‘little’ details. Sufficiently so that I deduced that, at least as far as her team were concerned, their use of Andrew was opportunistic. They wanted the RF to create leverage under Epstein’s team to pay off the girl. I presume they understood Epstein to be a state actor.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Curle

    Thanks for looking it up because it's such a non-factor in this mess I wouldn't have bothered, you idiot.

    In the real world of sane people the fact that the girl Andrew banged in the presence of a pedo creep will hold as much water as my grandma's thimble.

    I have no idea what "they" you're referring to, and I don't care, because your point is worthless.

    , @Alden
    @Curle

    She was under the age of consent for prostitution. And pimping and pandering are still illegal in the UK. Which is what Epstein and Maxwell were doing for 30 years. And who knows what else Epstein and Maxwell provided to Andrew? H&M are the epitome of respectability compared to Andrew’s associates. Or the Charles Camilla Dianna triangle. Or Andrew’s dubious paternity.

  69. @Alden
    @The Alarmist

    The Duke of Windsor never went back to London begging for support. He took a massive inheritance with him when he left. The retard younger brother King George was forbidden by his handlers to let Windsor back in the country.

    The UK royal family is a joke. The Queens only real position is head of the Commonwealth. Look at the pictures during the commonwealth conferences aka cannibals and cleptomaniacs convention . The Queen and PM the only Whites lost in a group of the most bloodthirsty blackest most corrupt kleptomaniacs on earth. They spend half their time in Africa posing with black 5 year olds and the rest chasing every liberal environmentalist leftist cause around.

    Their entertainment value is getting old.

    There’s a great show on Netflix. The Windsors Mean spirited and vulgar. Best show ever about the royal family. Too bad it didn’t feature Prince Andrews real father. Harry’s not the only bastard in the family.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    The Queen and PM the only Whites lost in a group of the most bloodthirsty blackest most corrupt kleptomaniacs on earth.

    In other words, an everyday mealtime on the plantation.

  70. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @AnotherDad



    “Yeah sure son, no sense wasting your time with the thousands of pretty, young, fertile British girls interested–at least a few of whom might be intelligent and sensible–by all means marry a 30-something, already divorced, American black woman, three years your senior who is an …. actress.”
     
    Hall of fame “dad advice”.

     

    Well, if you presume a world in which Royals are permitted to carry on affairs discretely (or otherwise), it may have been a good play for the Monarchy to bring this woman into its orbit but not close enough to threaten succession after Kate twice did her duty. It increases the drama, makes the Monarchy more relatable to (regrettably) increasingly non-white Britain, and in so doing preserves the institution for another generation or two. Harry could have his own affairs for love while carrying on as a character in an ongoing reality show.

    It may just have been the case that Markle had her own agenda, in which rather than being the designated black sheep she would parlay her association with the Crown into Kardashian style fame and riches while wounding it badly in her divorce from it.

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Reg Cæsar

    …after Kate twice did her duty.

    Thrice.

  71. • Replies: @anon
    @Paleo Retiree

    Does Meghan have NPD?

    She's somewhere in Cluster B for sure, and given her acting background NPD is perhaps more likely than BPD.

    Does Harry have Stockholm Syndrome?

    He's been heavily Betaized one way or another, and seems likely to have definite self respect issues. Maybe a version of "imposter syndrome", where he feels he does not deserve the life he's in.

  72. Stay classy Meghan! In a couple of years I predict Harry Hostage and Best Actress will be playing to half empty bars in Vegas.

  73. @Paperback Writer
    @Anon

    It's not a solid attempt at anything. It's pathetic scandalmongering on the part of two grifters.

    Guess what, Britain is 85% white. And 90% of them support the Royals. Oprah doesn't rule the UK.

    Britain's been attacked before and they survived. They'll survive again. In five years, when Harkle is divorced, when Meghan is in rehab, and Harry is a shell of himself, William and Kate will be in fine shape.

    Replies: @Anon

    I hope your right. But “the narrative” against an historical institution is not built overnight. It’s built incrementally, to be leveraged until it topples. Regime change is part of the cultural wars.

    A farce, but a useful farce. Oprah did careful editing to maximize damage.

  74. @Thoughts
    @The Alarmist

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    The only question is...is he evil enough to steal his brother's birthright or worse?

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @Wilkey, @Paperback Writer

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    Bingo. Perhaps all he has left to do is find some damning evidence. Perhaps a video of Queen Elizabeth referring to Kamala Harris as “very articulate” while Prince Charles is eating pancakes with Aunt Jemima syrup and Prince Harry is singing along to some rap song – not one with the N word, but cultural appropriation, nonetheless. All followed with scandalous interviews of NHS employees furious that his two sons refuse to take hormone treatments and vigorously object to having their willies cut off because they were once caught playing with their sister’s dolls (not one of which was black) while little Princess Charlotte was off in the corner reading Dr. Seuss books.

    It will be a scandal for the ages – a cornucopia of intolerance and hate that will leave the royal family with no option but to all abdicate in favor of King Harkle and his charming bride, Queen Meghan Lucretia’niqua’ashante’malcolmexquess I.

  75. I hope your right.

    It’s “you’re” — the contraction of “you” and “are.”

    Standards, my boy, standards.

    I’m not, in this case, being guilty of over-optimism. I’m really a grim realist. Harry and Meghan are based on nothing.

    I don’t even like the BRF. But they’re innocent of these bullshit charges. I saw from the start that Meghan was just grifting these guys. I can’t be alone.

    There may be grains of truth in Meghan’s charges against the British media’s hostility to her, but shitting on the Royals is unacceptable, and it will backfire.

  76. @Curle
    @Paperback Writer

    She was one year past British age of consent.

    Creep or not, one of the more distinctive features of the hit on Andrew was the accuser’s, and her handler’s, very disciplined messaging. No matter how heart rendering the tale, never did they let slip the girl’s age sufficient to establish she’d reached sexual majority at the time of the event. They were good about eliding past such ‘little’ details. Sufficiently so that I deduced that, at least as far as her team were concerned, their use of Andrew was opportunistic. They wanted the RF to create leverage under Epstein’s team to pay off the girl. I presume they understood Epstein to be a state actor.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    Thanks for looking it up because it’s such a non-factor in this mess I wouldn’t have bothered, you idiot.

    In the real world of sane people the fact that the girl Andrew banged in the presence of a pedo creep will hold as much water as my grandma’s thimble.

    I have no idea what “they” you’re referring to, and I don’t care, because your point is worthless.

  77. @Thoughts
    @The Alarmist

    Harry is not dumb. He knows exactly what he is doing, and he knows that the most powerful people in the world are behind him.

    The only question is...is he evil enough to steal his brother's birthright or worse?

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @Wilkey, @Paperback Writer

    Harry isn’t dumb but he’s crazy, and he’ll never be King, OK? You had one good insight: that Meghan’s real hate object in all of this is to take down Kate. She hates Kate.

    Kate is white, taller, genuinely beautiful, comes from an intact family, pops out gorgeous kids with distressing regularity, and is amazingly stable and grounded. She’s going to be Queen. After getting mildly razzed by the press for a while (a requisite in Britain) she became adored.

    Meghan is racially mixed, short, pretty but not beautiful, a child of divorce, started late with the kids, and is unstable and ungrounded. She’ll never be Queen. She was treated poorly by the press and was never going to be accepted. Someone is to blame for this.

    Meghan is jealous. Jealousy is a corrosive emotion.

    Her hubs is 6th in line. If you’re suggesting that this somehow is setting in line a British constitutional crisis, I suggest you go look for UFOs. If you’re suggesting something more sinister, I don’t want to go there.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Paperback Writer

    You’re right that Kate is tall. But Meghan isn’t short. She’s 5’6, medium tall. I believe the average American woman is 5’4. William is taller than Harry. ER 2 is only about 5’1 in her old age, 5’3 when younger.

    My belief is that Harry’s been looking for a way out for a long time. An American wife gave him the way out. Happens all the time. A spouse, friend, business opportunity or family gives someone the means to make a career or occupational change.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

  78. @AndrewR
    @Alden

    I'm sure that, between DNA testing and all the descendents Victoria has, we would know by now if she was a bastard. Her father never seem to suspect so.

    Replies: @Alden

    It was well known among TPTB at the time. Her mother’s husband having lived with a woman more than 20 years and never produced a child. That woman did have one child by a previous relationship. Then within months of the marriage wife pregnant with Victoria.

    By the time she was 12 or 13, Victoria’s height was one cause for suspicion. Barring severe childhood malnutrition or growth plate injuries it’s really not possible for a 5’9 man and 5’3 woman to produce a daughter who was about 4’10-11 at adulthood.

    Then there’s the hemophilia. Passed from grandfather to grandsons through his daughter to the grandsons. No trace of hemophilia in either Victoria’s mother or her legal father, Prince Edward Duke of Kent son of George 3 and his Queen Charlotte’s families as far back as the records went.

    But who cared? The UK needed a legitimate heir and Victoria’s mother produced one.

    DNA’s only been around the past 30 years. You think the royals are going to dig up George 3 and Charlotte’s bones, do a DNA test and announce to the world that they’re not descendants of George 3 and Queen Charlotte?

    They won’t even do a DNA test of the bones that could be the remains of Edward 4 and his brother Richard. Or any other remains that are definitely royal ancestors.

    It’s all very entertaining and enjoyable. Plus, it keeps the UK newspaper industry going. TPTB needed an heir and got one.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Alden

    George III has had multiple descendents who probably had porphyria, including one of Queen Liz's first cousins and the last Kaiser's sister.

    Victoria has thousands of descendants, and there are many more descendants of George III around. It really would not be that hard to verify the paternity of Victoria.

    Obviously it would be a very big deal for the royal family if Vic is proven to have been a bastardess (quite possibly resulting in a republic), but we live in an era in which such a revelation would be hard to suppress.

  79. @Luzzatto
    I read in the gossip tabloids that Meghan Markle hated the weather in London because she thinks it's way too cold there. No wonder she wanted to get the hell out of London ASAP and move back to Los Angeles. Meghan Markle wants to live and die in L.A, it's the only place for her!
    https://youtu.be/Wz2wVLyTar4

    Replies: @profnasty, @Alden

    She lived in Chicago 4 years and Toronto 7, much colder than London. Who are we peons to begrudge them their happiness?

    Today, 3/9 her father will go on British TV to discuss Meghan. Stay tuned for more details.

  80. @Curle
    @Paperback Writer

    She was one year past British age of consent.

    Creep or not, one of the more distinctive features of the hit on Andrew was the accuser’s, and her handler’s, very disciplined messaging. No matter how heart rendering the tale, never did they let slip the girl’s age sufficient to establish she’d reached sexual majority at the time of the event. They were good about eliding past such ‘little’ details. Sufficiently so that I deduced that, at least as far as her team were concerned, their use of Andrew was opportunistic. They wanted the RF to create leverage under Epstein’s team to pay off the girl. I presume they understood Epstein to be a state actor.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Alden

    She was under the age of consent for prostitution. And pimping and pandering are still illegal in the UK. Which is what Epstein and Maxwell were doing for 30 years. And who knows what else Epstein and Maxwell provided to Andrew? H&M are the epitome of respectability compared to Andrew’s associates. Or the Charles Camilla Dianna triangle. Or Andrew’s dubious paternity.

  81. anon[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Paleo Retiree
    Does Meghan have NPD? Does Harry have Stockholm Syndrome?

    https://pagesix.com/2021/03/08/half-sister-says-meghan-markle-has-narcissistic-personality-disorder/?_ga=2.62103084.1017295828.1615111487-amp-hKhXOtzhpWXnqNK7wPoEIQ

    Replies: @anon

    Does Meghan have NPD?

    She’s somewhere in Cluster B for sure, and given her acting background NPD is perhaps more likely than BPD.

    Does Harry have Stockholm Syndrome?

    He’s been heavily Betaized one way or another, and seems likely to have definite self respect issues. Maybe a version of “imposter syndrome”, where he feels he does not deserve the life he’s in.

  82. @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    @Jack D


    The display of self-pity the ex-royals put on with Oprah was pathetic and playing the race card (“the Royals were worried that Archie might be dark skinned”) was the metaphorical equivalent of pour lighter fluid on the flames of racial tension. The Markles say they want privacy – everyone knows that the best way to obtain privacy is to do a prime time interview with Oprah.
     
    The British Monarchy is certainly an anachronism - a proto-celebrity enterprise before the modern celebrity culture. Perhaps because the British Monarch is understood to have had only ceremonial powers* for some time the institution has survived while its counterparts which actually wielded State power were "relieved" of it in the modern era (notably royal cousins the Kaiser and the Czar). I suppose it remains as an institution binding the British people to their shared past. I doesn't mean much to me, but you can see how it means something to at least the vestigial remnant of the British people alive and aware before the era of mass immigration and diversity indoctrination.

    You can't convince me that this woman isn't a shrew who got Harry wrapped and set about to exploit her association with the Crown. I have a surmise that the plan is for her to go from the C-list to Kardashian level in a "famous for being famous" grift. Members of the Kardashian/Jenner circus made hundreds of millions of dollars for doing not much of anything, and I see this woman trying to parlay the (likely) self-generated Royal drama spiced up with race outrage into immense wealth in short order.

    *The play/BBC adaptation plays with the idea of Price Charles, having been coronated Charles III, withholding royal assent to a bill before Parliament and the aftermath of the act.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    You can’t convince me that this woman isn’t a shrew who got Harry wrapped and set about to exploit her association with the Crown.

    Spot on BUT Harry was ripe for the picking. In 2008 he said he “hated” England.

    it means something to at least the vestigial remnant of the British people alive and aware before the era of mass immigration and diversity indoctrination.

    Also spot on, which of course is why the media must destroy it. They won’t destroy the RF, but they might well destroy the Commonwealth.

    *The play/BBC adaptation plays with the idea of Price Charles, having been coronated Charles III, withholding royal assent to a bill before Parliament and the aftermath of the act.

    Are you referring to the play, *Charles III*? I saw it on TV in 2017/18 AM (After Meghan) and I was struck by the fact that the Harry character had a black actress girlfriend.

    Chronology: the play was produced in 2014 – so was written BM (Before Meghan – who Harry met in 2016, or so the story goes).

    The theater is a gossip-mill, so I am guessing that the theater world knew that Harry had a penchant for black actress/trollopes before she came onto the scene. Or that they were going out before it was announced in 2016, which amounts to the same thing.

  83. @Steve Sailer
    @The Alarmist

    Yeah, it sounds like an update to Cecil Rhodes' plan to finance in his will a secret society to ensure British Empire dominance forever by reuniting the USA into the UK thru covert machinations.

    Replies: @Rockford Tyson

    There are Canadians that to do this day despise Americans for having told King George to take a hike. In fact, one of the reasons why Canada accepted so many American Vietnam War deserters is because they didn’t consider them to be deserters at all, as America is an illegal country that shouldn’t even exist.

    My father told me that, whe he was a little kid back in the 1950’s, his dad had a Canadian friend who was into his nineties, and he refused to shake hands or talk to Americans as he considers them traitors to the Crown. Needless to say, my grandfather was not American. Every time this elderly Canadian gentleman met an American, he would put his hands behind his back and turn his back on the American in contempt.

    Oddly, he said that this man considered Brazil the only legitimatedly independent country of the Americas, as the country was separated from Portugal by decree of the King Himself. Thus, it has a legitimate moral ground as an indepent country. All other country of the Americas are the result of “traitorous revolutions against their Kings, who were appointed by God.”

    This elderly gentleman was a member of the Church of England, and he considered America’s War of Independence worse than treason, but blasphemy. Because the King is appointed by God, and Men have no right to reject their King, unless the King committed sacrilege, which was not the case with King George.

    • Replies: @Not Only Wrathful
    @Rockford Tyson

    They clearly don't make them like they used to.

    I also suspect that the Canadian friend was extremely eccentric.

  84. @Timur The Lame
    I really don't pay attention to the royal crap but it provided the only break from the 24/7 Covid shit and I haven't watched TV for over a decade so the only snippet I got was on a radio news channel as I was waking up to the alarm. Surprisingly the female host called bullshit on Sparkle Markle saying that she really didn't know anything about Harry, the British Royalty etc etc.. but for what he told her in their deep personal conversations.

    So while every white trash hookup has both sides checking out their latest sweetie on Google, this career minded actress, dating a prince doesn't even check Google on her world famous beau, Princess Di and the British Royalty? Apparently her own mother had only a passing knowledge of the late "England's Rose". Let me rush out any buy the latest "Oprah Approved" book. Mind blowing that they can get away with this but then consider the audience.

    Prince Harry is a sheltered idiot and hence a simple rabbit for a professional she-wolf whore. He didn't stand a chance. In her cunning she waited to fart out Archie before she made her serious moves and now she is set for life with a stage that an average 'C' actress couldn't even dream of.

    My only real curiosity would be to have a true transcript of conversations that Phil, Prince of Greece and Denmark would have had with Betty Battenberg HRH when news first would have reached them about the appearance of Farkle. They would know about the tenuous state that the institution of the monarchy was in, the dreadful power of wokism/racism etc. Would they have sanctioned the union knowing that Hewitt Jr. would never wear the crown and that this could be a pressure release for the 'mob'. Would the phrase "bloody idiot, just like his mother" have been spoken. Or is this a situation much like taking the Covid Jab to fix the immediate problem only to find out that the third or fourth mutation would become a death sentence?

    Happy International Women's Day! Take a whore to lunch. Oh, sorry no restaurants....

    Cheers-

    Replies: @Alden

    Once a member of the royal family reaches the age of 25, they don’t need permission of the sovereign to marry. ER2, not Phillip is the sovereign so only her consent is needed for a royal under the age of 25 to marry.

    Unless a royal of any age marries a catholic. Then that royal must formally give up all rights of succession for themselves and their children.
    Or just have a civil or Catholic wedding.

  85. @Paperback Writer
    @Thoughts

    Harry isn't dumb but he's crazy, and he'll never be King, OK? You had one good insight: that Meghan's real hate object in all of this is to take down Kate. She hates Kate.

    Kate is white, taller, genuinely beautiful, comes from an intact family, pops out gorgeous kids with distressing regularity, and is amazingly stable and grounded. She's going to be Queen. After getting mildly razzed by the press for a while (a requisite in Britain) she became adored.

    Meghan is racially mixed, short, pretty but not beautiful, a child of divorce, started late with the kids, and is unstable and ungrounded. She'll never be Queen. She was treated poorly by the press and was never going to be accepted. Someone is to blame for this.

    Meghan is jealous. Jealousy is a corrosive emotion.

    Her hubs is 6th in line. If you're suggesting that this somehow is setting in line a British constitutional crisis, I suggest you go look for UFOs. If you're suggesting something more sinister, I don't want to go there.

    Replies: @Alden

    You’re right that Kate is tall. But Meghan isn’t short. She’s 5’6, medium tall. I believe the average American woman is 5’4. William is taller than Harry. ER 2 is only about 5’1 in her old age, 5’3 when younger.

    My belief is that Harry’s been looking for a way out for a long time. An American wife gave him the way out. Happens all the time. A spouse, friend, business opportunity or family gives someone the means to make a career or occupational change.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Alden

    Megan is not 5'6. She is *said* to be 5'6" - actresses almost always add a couple of inches, unless they are Sigourney Weaver tall, then they subtract.

    Markle wears super high heels that add at least 5" to her height. Next to Kate (a legit 5'8") she's always about 4" shorter. But 5'4" isn't really short, so I should have said "shorter."

    Of course, Harry's been looking for a way out for a long time. Check the date:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-harry-england/prince-harry-i-dont-like-england-much-idUKL2934697420080301

    Replies: @Alden

  86. @Alden
    @Paperback Writer

    You’re right that Kate is tall. But Meghan isn’t short. She’s 5’6, medium tall. I believe the average American woman is 5’4. William is taller than Harry. ER 2 is only about 5’1 in her old age, 5’3 when younger.

    My belief is that Harry’s been looking for a way out for a long time. An American wife gave him the way out. Happens all the time. A spouse, friend, business opportunity or family gives someone the means to make a career or occupational change.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    Megan is not 5’6. She is *said* to be 5’6″ – actresses almost always add a couple of inches, unless they are Sigourney Weaver tall, then they subtract.

    Markle wears super high heels that add at least 5″ to her height. Next to Kate (a legit 5’8″) she’s always about 4″ shorter. But 5’4″ isn’t really short, so I should have said “shorter.”

    Of course, Harry’s been looking for a way out for a long time. Check the date:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-harry-england/prince-harry-i-dont-like-england-much-idUKL2934697420080301

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Paperback Writer

    Have you ever seen Meghan in flats? Neither have I. Height is good for models but not actresses. Most actors men and women are on the short side. I watched the show Suits. Her love interest was about her height when she had heels on, not that much taller when she had flat shoes on. Wikipedia says Kate is 5’9.

    I liked Suits because it was a civil commercial law firm and not endlessly defending poor pathetic psychopath blacks against evil White cops as so many legal books and movies are.

    The royals are big business in the UK. There are even 2 recognized occupations, Royal Watcher and Royal Expert. Imagine putting that in your kids birth certificate census, mortgage forms etc.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  87. @Paperback Writer
    @Alden

    Megan is not 5'6. She is *said* to be 5'6" - actresses almost always add a couple of inches, unless they are Sigourney Weaver tall, then they subtract.

    Markle wears super high heels that add at least 5" to her height. Next to Kate (a legit 5'8") she's always about 4" shorter. But 5'4" isn't really short, so I should have said "shorter."

    Of course, Harry's been looking for a way out for a long time. Check the date:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-harry-england/prince-harry-i-dont-like-england-much-idUKL2934697420080301

    Replies: @Alden

    Have you ever seen Meghan in flats? Neither have I. Height is good for models but not actresses. Most actors men and women are on the short side. I watched the show Suits. Her love interest was about her height when she had heels on, not that much taller when she had flat shoes on. Wikipedia says Kate is 5’9.

    I liked Suits because it was a civil commercial law firm and not endlessly defending poor pathetic psychopath blacks against evil White cops as so many legal books and movies are.

    The royals are big business in the UK. There are even 2 recognized occupations, Royal Watcher and Royal Expert. Imagine putting that in your kids birth certificate census, mortgage forms etc.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    At Yale Drama School, Sigourney Weaver (5'11") got stuck on the bench behind Meryl Streep (5'7"), in part because they could cast a wider array in height of leading men opposite Streep.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

  88. @Alden
    @Paperback Writer

    Have you ever seen Meghan in flats? Neither have I. Height is good for models but not actresses. Most actors men and women are on the short side. I watched the show Suits. Her love interest was about her height when she had heels on, not that much taller when she had flat shoes on. Wikipedia says Kate is 5’9.

    I liked Suits because it was a civil commercial law firm and not endlessly defending poor pathetic psychopath blacks against evil White cops as so many legal books and movies are.

    The royals are big business in the UK. There are even 2 recognized occupations, Royal Watcher and Royal Expert. Imagine putting that in your kids birth certificate census, mortgage forms etc.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    At Yale Drama School, Sigourney Weaver (5’11”) got stuck on the bench behind Meryl Streep (5’7″), in part because they could cast a wider array in height of leading men opposite Streep.

    • Replies: @Paperback Writer
    @Steve Sailer

    I've passed Miss Weaver on the street and I think she's taller than 5'11". She is so willowy she never stands straight. I would not be surprised if, when she straightens up, she's in the 6'1" range. For that and other reasons she'd have been better as Julia Child than that Streep woman.

    To Alden: "Most actors men and women are on the short side. " Not really. Actresses tend to be tall, ScarJo notwithstanding.

    As for Meghan, I would even revise her height downwards. Harry is 6 feet, and in every head-to-head photo I've seen of them, he's a good 6" taller than she. Now, subtract at least five more inches and what do you get? She's quite petite.

    https://www.etonline.com/sites/default/files/styles/840x470/public/images/2020-03/meghanharry.jpg?h=827f73f4&itok=QSE_OjgD

  89. I’d like to know how they walk on grass in those spike heels.
    My 5’11” sister went to a women’s college and always got stuck with a male role, except for Lady Bracknell in Importance of Being Earnest. I don’t think she’s ever worn high heels (or wanted to)–they probably don’t make them in 11 narrow, not even for drag queens.

    • Replies: @William Logic
    @Ralph L

    I think people are missing the larger story. This is an attempt by team Oprah/Obama family and friends to negatively affect and possibly drastically change how the monarchy works. The third term of Obama hasn’t let up on the progressive dream agenda. And it’s amazing how some wonder where the interview actually took place. I thought about the Barack retreat and Martha’s Vineyard. I found it telling when Michelle provided a video comment via the favorite vacation destination. The tactics are so scripted and predictable. Also, pay close attention to all of those speaking out on the matter: Jay-Z and Beyonce, the Clintons, certain pro athletes, namely certain tennis personalities. All of these are very close friends and associates of the Obama’s. If you look to close, you may miss it. And all of the arguments for change and outrage is all based around race. It won’t be much longer before there will be a call for some sort of restitution. Finally, with all of this being said, does anyone still remember the case with all of the outrage by supposed racist comments made from a certain basketball owner to his girlfriend of a minority background? Not only was everyone made to feel guilty over the comments; the owner had to step down. It didn’t end there, however. He was forced to give up the team. So. what am I missing? Was there a trial outside of public opinion? And who was given first preference to receive it? I believe it was Magic Johnson and Oprah. Also, I’m not sure exactly what the particulars were. After all was said and done, the team was either given away to the two personalities or sold to them at a great discount. This is utter insanity? The following day, all went back to life as usual...

  90. @Steve Sailer
    @Alden

    At Yale Drama School, Sigourney Weaver (5'11") got stuck on the bench behind Meryl Streep (5'7"), in part because they could cast a wider array in height of leading men opposite Streep.

    Replies: @Paperback Writer

    I’ve passed Miss Weaver on the street and I think she’s taller than 5’11”. She is so willowy she never stands straight. I would not be surprised if, when she straightens up, she’s in the 6’1″ range. For that and other reasons she’d have been better as Julia Child than that Streep woman.

    To Alden: “Most actors men and women are on the short side. ” Not really. Actresses tend to be tall, ScarJo notwithstanding.

    As for Meghan, I would even revise her height downwards. Harry is 6 feet, and in every head-to-head photo I’ve seen of them, he’s a good 6″ taller than she. Now, subtract at least five more inches and what do you get? She’s quite petite.

    https://www.etonline.com/sites/default/files/styles/840×470/public/images/2020-03/meghanharry.jpg?h=827f73f4&itok=QSE_OjgD

  91. @Alden
    @AndrewR

    It was well known among TPTB at the time. Her mother’s husband having lived with a woman more than 20 years and never produced a child. That woman did have one child by a previous relationship. Then within months of the marriage wife pregnant with Victoria.

    By the time she was 12 or 13, Victoria’s height was one cause for suspicion. Barring severe childhood malnutrition or growth plate injuries it’s really not possible for a 5’9 man and 5’3 woman to produce a daughter who was about 4’10-11 at adulthood.

    Then there’s the hemophilia. Passed from grandfather to grandsons through his daughter to the grandsons. No trace of hemophilia in either Victoria’s mother or her legal father, Prince Edward Duke of Kent son of George 3 and his Queen Charlotte’s families as far back as the records went.

    But who cared? The UK needed a legitimate heir and Victoria’s mother produced one.

    DNA’s only been around the past 30 years. You think the royals are going to dig up George 3 and Charlotte’s bones, do a DNA test and announce to the world that they’re not descendants of George 3 and Queen Charlotte?

    They won’t even do a DNA test of the bones that could be the remains of Edward 4 and his brother Richard. Or any other remains that are definitely royal ancestors.

    It’s all very entertaining and enjoyable. Plus, it keeps the UK newspaper industry going. TPTB needed an heir and got one.

    Replies: @AndrewR

    George III has had multiple descendents who probably had porphyria, including one of Queen Liz’s first cousins and the last Kaiser’s sister.

    Victoria has thousands of descendants, and there are many more descendants of George III around. It really would not be that hard to verify the paternity of Victoria.

    Obviously it would be a very big deal for the royal family if Vic is proven to have been a bastardess (quite possibly resulting in a republic), but we live in an era in which such a revelation would be hard to suppress.

  92. @Ralph L
    I'd like to know how they walk on grass in those spike heels.
    My 5'11" sister went to a women's college and always got stuck with a male role, except for Lady Bracknell in Importance of Being Earnest. I don't think she's ever worn high heels (or wanted to)--they probably don't make them in 11 narrow, not even for drag queens.

    Replies: @William Logic

    I think people are missing the larger story. This is an attempt by team Oprah/Obama family and friends to negatively affect and possibly drastically change how the monarchy works. The third term of Obama hasn’t let up on the progressive dream agenda. And it’s amazing how some wonder where the interview actually took place. I thought about the Barack retreat and Martha’s Vineyard. I found it telling when Michelle provided a video comment via the favorite vacation destination. The tactics are so scripted and predictable. Also, pay close attention to all of those speaking out on the matter: Jay-Z and Beyonce, the Clintons, certain pro athletes, namely certain tennis personalities. All of these are very close friends and associates of the Obama’s. If you look to close, you may miss it. And all of the arguments for change and outrage is all based around race. It won’t be much longer before there will be a call for some sort of restitution. Finally, with all of this being said, does anyone still remember the case with all of the outrage by supposed racist comments made from a certain basketball owner to his girlfriend of a minority background? Not only was everyone made to feel guilty over the comments; the owner had to step down. It didn’t end there, however. He was forced to give up the team. So. what am I missing? Was there a trial outside of public opinion? And who was given first preference to receive it? I believe it was Magic Johnson and Oprah. Also, I’m not sure exactly what the particulars were. After all was said and done, the team was either given away to the two personalities or sold to them at a great discount. This is utter insanity? The following day, all went back to life as usual…

  93. @Rockford Tyson
    @Steve Sailer

    There are Canadians that to do this day despise Americans for having told King George to take a hike. In fact, one of the reasons why Canada accepted so many American Vietnam War deserters is because they didn't consider them to be deserters at all, as America is an illegal country that shouldn't even exist.

    My father told me that, whe he was a little kid back in the 1950's, his dad had a Canadian friend who was into his nineties, and he refused to shake hands or talk to Americans as he considers them traitors to the Crown. Needless to say, my grandfather was not American. Every time this elderly Canadian gentleman met an American, he would put his hands behind his back and turn his back on the American in contempt.

    Oddly, he said that this man considered Brazil the only legitimatedly independent country of the Americas, as the country was separated from Portugal by decree of the King Himself. Thus, it has a legitimate moral ground as an indepent country. All other country of the Americas are the result of "traitorous revolutions against their Kings, who were appointed by God."

    This elderly gentleman was a member of the Church of England, and he considered America's War of Independence worse than treason, but blasphemy. Because the King is appointed by God, and Men have no right to reject their King, unless the King committed sacrilege, which was not the case with King George.

    Replies: @Not Only Wrathful

    They clearly don’t make them like they used to.

    I also suspect that the Canadian friend was extremely eccentric.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement