RSS
From CNN:
CNN legal analyst: Smollett “exposed himself to jail time,” with testimony
From CNN’s Leinz Vales
A Chicago jury found Jussie Smollett guilty of five counts of disorderly conduct for making false reports to police that he was a victim of a hate crime in January 2019.
A disorderly conduct charge for a false crime report is a Class 4 felony and punishable by up to three years in prison and a \$25,000 fine.
However, CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson said the judge could give the former “Empire” actor probation, but added that Smollett, “exposed himself to jail time,” when he testified in court.
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN. “What Jussie Smollett said was resoundingly rejected by that jury. The jury did not buy what he was selling. That’s not lost upon a judge. You came into the courtroom and fabricated.”
Jussie, you know how you are always saying, “But what I really want to do is direct”? Well, don’t. Also, don’t try to write or be your own casting director.
Laura Coates, a former federal prosecutor, agreed with Jackson, saying Smollett’s testimony was a “miscalculation” by the defense team.
“So him taking the stand lead to his exposure in the way Joey has spoken about,” Coates said. “A judge is now looking at you, taking everything you had to say and assessing it.”
But Jussie hadn’t been in the spotlight since 2019. He missed it.
Smollett was acquitted on one count of felony disorderly conduct.
So the jury didn’t just throw the book at him?
Smollett took the stand and testified before the Chicago jury that he never lied to police and denied orchestrating the attack on himself.
Prosecutors sought to show that the actor made false reports to police after paying Olabinjo and Abimbola Osundairo to carry out a staged hate crime attack against him to garner sympathetic media coverage.
The Nigerian bodybuilder brothers were the icing on the cake. What a hilarious story. Shall we see its like again?
Yeah, probably.
As I wrote in 2019 in my Taki’s column “Fake Noose!:”
You can call it Sailer’s Boast: Whenever there is some remarkably dumb development flabbergasting the respectable pundits, I’ve no doubt explained the entire phenomenon years ago in various Taki’s columns.
For example, the sidesplitting Jussie Smollett fake noose story is a classic example of the hate-hoax phenomenon that I’ve been explicating since 2004. So, I’m going to take another victory lap to review what I’ve figured out about hate hysteria over the past fifteen years.
To you or me, Jussie’s tale probably sounds like just about the stupidest hate hoax yet. But that’s because we possess the conceptual category of “hate hoax.” So it’s easy for us to call up from our memories a long list of such instances that previously dominated the headlines (for example, in this year alone, Covington Catholic and poor Jazmine Barnes) and conclude that, wow, this one is even more self-evidently absurd than the UVA fraternity initiation gang rape on broken glass hate hoax that bedazzled the national press in 2014.
In contrast, The New York Times, for instance, has never even printed the term “hate hoax.”
And that’s still true, almost three years later.
Instead, there’s just an Epidemic of Hate perpetrated by what Tom Wolfe would call the Great White Defendants…and then there are forgotten random incidents that didn’t quite pan out. But to the prestige press there’s no such thing as a pattern of purported hate crimes routinely imploding embarrassingly.
So, Smollett’s ludicrous yarn became national news, with leading Democratic politicians such as Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Cory Booker rushing to endorse Jussie’s grift.
Unfortunately for Jussie, he went to the police with his cock-and-bull story. That’s not the kind of mistake that Jackie Coakley of UVA made. She told endless variations of her story to everybody…except the cops, and has therefore gotten away scot-free.
Unlike the national media and presidential contenders, local police are perfectly familiar with the possibility that people sometimes lie to them. In fact, folks perjure themselves to cops all the time. They’re used to it. So cops, unlike candidates and commentators, don’t turn off their brains as soon as somebody invokes identity talismans such as race and sexual orientation.
.@JussieSmollett is one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know. I’m praying for his quick recovery.
This was an attempted modern day lynching. No one should have to fear for their life because of their sexuality or color of their skin. We must confront this hate.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) January 29, 2019
What happened today to @JussieSmollett must never be tolerated in this country. We must stand up and demand that we no longer give this hate safe harbor; that homophobia and racism have no place on our streets or in our hearts. We are with you, Jussie. https://t.co/o8ilPu68CM
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) January 30, 2019
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
According to Black’s Law Dictionary a felony is a serious crime usually punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death.
In this case, not so much so. Community service. Probation. An awards ceremony. A nice write up in the New York Times. An exciting opportunity to appear in some gay television show.
He may or may-not get time, but if this circus firmly plants the idea of “hate hoaxes” in the public consciousness, well, we will have gotten a big victory after all.
But the problem is "Why did we even need this to get "hate hoax" out there?"
Why was Trump responding to Biden and Harris with "this smells like yet another hate-hoax" and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris immediately respond by slandering white Americans."
Our problem is that we don't have "conservative" politicians who are saying "yet another hate-hoax" and "yet another blood libel"...
We do not have conservative politicians who speak simple basic truths:
-- "Different people, different groups of people have different genes and cultures and will have different outcomes in life. The Democrats blaming those on white people is the worst sort of toxic politics."
-- "Diversity is not a strength but a source of contention and conflict."
-- "Immigration is population replacement."
-- "Immigration without end, mathematically means the America your children, grandchildren, your posterity inherit, will get progressively more crowded, more contentious, more unpleasant, more impoverished ... until it's so unpleasant that no one else wants to come. That's what the Democrats want for your kids."
-- "Deplorable white people are not the property of minorities. But like anyone else entitled to live as they wish, with whom they wish, according to their own norms values and culture."
-- "If we no longer share traditional American norms, values, traditions, holidays, heroes, history, our culture. No longer agree on our public norms and culture, then we are not one nation, and should peacefully separate."
Jussie's a propaganda win. But our problem is we do not have conservative politicians who are even fighting. We don't have conservatives who are actually trying to conserve anything.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Jack D
As long as ‘hate crimes’ are a thing, ‘hate hoaxes’ must be categorized as ‘hate crimes’ because they stir up heated racial tensions and accuse an entire community.
When a black say he was attacked by whites, he’s not talking only of that crime. He’s blaming the entire community of creating a climate for such a thing.
It’s like that Jewish guy who made those bomb threats to synagogues. He was trying to create the impression that all these white ‘antisemitic’ Christians were out to get Jews.
Smollett was out to smear half of America that voted for Trump. Yet, he gets off with misdemeanors of ‘disorderly conduct’? If anything, this was an orderly conspiracy.
Following the current logic, if I paint a swastika on a Jewish property, that is a ‘hate crime’.
But, supposing I’m Christian and I paint a hoax sign on my property that says, “We Jews hate Jesus and want to kill all you Christian scum”, thus imply Jews are a hateful and hostile bunch, that only counts as ‘disorderly conduct’?
There must be legislation that really throws the book at the likes of Smollett.
https://twitter.com/NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it's long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.Replies: @Thomas, @prosa123, @Negrolphin Pool, @AndrewR
That sort of thinking, however, still assumes a sense of liberal belief that all individuals are equal before the law, and that rationality and reason aren't just an oppressive tool of the West. Woke thinking assumes all whites are guilty, and whomever gets punished for it is just the accident of the moment. You always have it coming, whitey, so don't complain when it does. And even if Jussie made this one up, you all really wanted to do it, so you're still guilty.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
His some thousands plus compared to the 5 or 6 "real" ones?
Happy, happy, joy, joy!
CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN.
As if the Judge didn’t get this from the actual depositions. Why is CNN employing this man ? Because he’s an Affirmative pick dindu.
Cup-bearer for Don Lemon?
But hey, enough of that, let the BLM riots begin! Another Miracle Mile Kristallnacht and inventory-reduction event is in order to express da peeplz's righteous anger!Replies: @bruce county
Having misspent my youth toiling at the criminal bar, judges take a very dim view of defendants who lie through their teeth. Suspect it's the problem with an actor being a defendant; thought simply playing a role well would carry the day. Also appears his attorneys did not grasp the pitfalls of letting a total narcissist testify. Explaining driving around Chicago smoking dope and visiting gay bathhouses with one of your paid assailants did not in any way dispprove the hate hoax conspiracy. Height of it was Smollett getting angry with the DA for reading his own texts verbatim with the "n" owrd out loud. As if somehow the prosecutor quoting his own vulgarity ws the worst crime imaginable.
Juicy Smo-le-ay is about to spend some time behind bars.Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Curle
"Hannity, and other bad faith media personalities on the right, used Smollett's conviction to (predictably) attack the news media and aim to delegitimize the credibility of the entire press.
The tactic is dishonest, yet simple: Take an actual act of deception, in this case one that was perpetrated by an actor and covered heavily by the press, and then use it to suggest that anything reported by mainstream sources cannot be trusted. Everything is a hoax."
This is outrageous…White Males deserve to be chattel slaves as part of reparation to Black People!!!!!
Blacks already prepared for this:
https://imagez.tmz.com/image/3b/o/2015/01/23/3b7b5256c43c5faab21736b400162512_md.jpgReplies: @John Johnson
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.
Living in a black country/continent tends to negate any US MSM media bias about the issue.
Those Nigerian bros are probably heroes back home. I don't think pale skinned gay American semi black actors get a lot of African respect when pulling off a stupid hoax attempt.
Let's face it, "Jussie" is an embarrassment to everyone with two brain cells.
While real attorneys for him would have insisted on a plea deal, Jussie may have concluded that post-conviction and a few months in the slam (mainly away from dangerous fellow blacks who don't like fag brothers) he believes it will only add to his marketability.
His name will be well known and after all, in show biz, name recognition is king. He'll probably be on Dancing With the Stars next year.Replies: @SafeNow, @West reanimator
I had to look up Jazmine Barnes. The wrongfully-accused white burglar hung himself in jail 5 months after 2 black guys were arrested for her murder. I guess the stress was too much, or another inmate still thought he was guilty.
BTW, was there a multi-million dollar settlement for his family? Was Shaun King ever held accountable, in any way? Are all these questions inevitably rhetorical?
Got any links for this story? I had no idea there was a story here apart from mistaken identity gang stuff. Are you saying they found a Great White Defendant?
You now remember that Jussie Smullett is for reals a blood relative of United States Vice President Kamala Harris.
—–
OT hearing now for the first time LA DA Cuck Whatever Gascoigne’s voice for the first time. He literally sounds like Kermit the Frog* imitating a stereotypical retard. MISS PIG EE AHM NAHD A SMART MAN BUT I KNOW WHAT LOVE IS
*The original, as should not have to be explained.
From “The New York Times” (via AmRen.com):
***
The special prosecutor in the case, Daniel K. Webb, told the jury that Mr. Smollett staged the attack because he had received a hate-filled death threat in the mail and was upset by the muted response of the producers behind the television show on which he starred, “Empire.”
***
Wrong, Mr. Prosecutor! Jussie Smollett obviously sent that supposed death threat– complete with fake anthrax– to himself.
***
On January 22, 2019, a letter arrived at the Chicago studio of Smollett’s employer that was addressed to Smollett and depicted a stick figure hanging from a tree with a gun pointing towards it. It read “Smollett, Jussie you will die” and “MAGA” and contained a white powder determined to be Tylenol.[8]
***
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jussie_Smollett_assault_hoax#Incident
The January 29, 2019, hate hoax was merely a follow-up. Both hoaxes by Jussie Smollett almost certainly were intended by him to help his good friends in the United States Senate, Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, get their so-called “anti-lynching” bill passed.
20,000 images.
We should send them to Israel, for safekeeping.
We wouldn’t want the “wrong” people to gain access. They might try to blackmail
our leaders!
This brothel scene from “The Godather 2” is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso.
Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein’s island. That’s why he purchased that remote&isolated property.
Epstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.
------
The best thing about that scene is the perfect opacity regarding who choked the girl. Was it the senator during, or is he actually perfectly innocent, but they silently murdered her while he slept? You now realize that our criminal investigative system at its best cannot know. The senator is in the same situation either way. If blackmail isn't being used for just this reason then magic powers must exist.
https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange/status/1468727688508723204
You are also covering for the Jewish-American billionaires who funded/fronted for these Mossad agents carrying out the orders of the government of Israel (orders to pimp American girls in honey traps set for prominent men).Replies: @Reg Cæsar
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Bill in Glendale, @International Jew, @AnotherDad, @Muggles
The Nigerian bodybuilder brothers were a great look for sheer entertainment value.
https://calcoastnews.com/2015/12/former-neighbor-accused-of-supporting-san-bernardino-terrorists/
iSteve, didn't you have a contest for the annual successor of Mr. Marqez as dumb criminal conspiracy patsy of the year, but for years there were no successful nominees?
Also, we now have a more memetic, more publicly-known synonym for hate hoax: "Pulling a Jussie Smollett."
Let's see if it catches on.
I remember thinking at the time how strange it was that Harris was echoing the line from the movie so closely. In the movie, the people who say this have been brainwashed. I don't think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.Replies: @EdwardM, @Nicholas Stix, @Colin Wright
And then Ellen Page ‘became’ Elliot Page. We to shut down social media for women born after 1985 until we figure out what’s going on.
Here is the full interview where she seems to give enough evidence for a diagnosis for a cluster B personality disorder.
And here is Chappelle more or less saying Steve’s original piece on the incident but in Chappelle style.
It should also not be forgotten that he sent threatening messages about himself to the production offices of Empire with letters cut out of magazines just to add to the insanity of it all.
My guess: Probation, no jail time.
Well, this is evidence that perhaps I have actually become overly-pessimistic. I was really afraid that there would be no conviction due to one or two black holdouts on the jury, resulting in an MSM take that would go something like: “Just as many were surprised by the verdict in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse–the white man who crossed state lines to kill two unarmed protesters at a BLM march with an assault rifle and later was photographed making a white power signal with his fingers–some may be disappointed in the Jussie Smollett trial outcome, but, for better or worse, this is the venerable justice system Americans cherish.”
Who stood firm for the facts 'midst the furor.
Lady Justice, though ill,
Has some life in her still;
With physicians as this we may cure 'er.
At birth, all blacks should have tattooed on their foreheads “for entertainment purposes only!” That’d clear up many of the misunderstandings we have as a multicultural society.
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
Right, as with Mueller, an FBI … “investigation” … has the authority to grab stuff because that stuff is evidence. Including stuff important to other potential investigations. Once grabbed you cannot FOIA it because it’s “evidence.” And if they happen to never get around to reading it, let alone release it …
——
The best thing about that scene is the perfect opacity regarding who choked the girl. Was it the senator during, or is he actually perfectly innocent, but they silently murdered her while he slept? You now realize that our criminal investigative system at its best cannot know. The senator is in the same situation either way. If blackmail isn’t being used for just this reason then magic powers must exist.
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
Less concerned about that than the claim that, when the FBI went to seize the hard drives, they found that they already had FBI evidence tags on them:
So, there was a special prosecutor appointed in this case: Dan Webb. He was the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois under Reagan.
Getting these political jobs may or may not mean you are good.
But I am/was a trial lawyer. Or not. I may merely be a mythical creature from the Wisconsin Northwoods.
I watched a few of Dan Webb’s cases as a young trial lawyer. He is that good (he was representing white collar criminals at the time) . I actually aped a bit of his schtick (smart white humble guy) and it worked.
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Bill in Glendale, @International Jew, @AnotherDad, @Muggles
And if they’d wanted to hurt him what would his face look like?
In this case, not so much so. Community service. Probation. An awards ceremony. A nice write up in the New York Times. An exciting opportunity to appear in some gay television show.Replies: @Philbert Desanex, @Hibernian, @PaceLaw, @Escher
I’m not clear why Smollet did not receive an extra charge of lying under oath. If he testified that he never lied to police or about other aspects of the case that were contradictory to the actual events, that seems a clear case of perjury.
Oh, and make him civilly liable for every black-on-White, Jew-on-White
and homo-on-White violent incident for as long as the sordid coverage lasts.
If Jussie doesn’t serve time in prison, that will be a travesty.
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN.
As if the Judge didn't get this from the actual depositions. Why is CNN employing this man ? Because he's an Affirmative pick dindu.Replies: @Squid, @Bugg, @R.G. Camara, @JimDandy
“Why is CNN employing this man?”
Cup-bearer for Don Lemon?
But hey, enough of that, let the BLM riots begin! Another Miracle Mile Kristallnacht and inventory-reduction event is in order to express da peeplz’s righteous anger!
Charles Barkley cuttin’ up Joosy….
When a black say he was attacked by whites, he's not talking only of that crime. He's blaming the entire community of creating a climate for such a thing.
It's like that Jewish guy who made those bomb threats to synagogues. He was trying to create the impression that all these white 'antisemitic' Christians were out to get Jews.
Smollett was out to smear half of America that voted for Trump. Yet, he gets off with misdemeanors of 'disorderly conduct'? If anything, this was an orderly conspiracy.
Following the current logic, if I paint a swastika on a Jewish property, that is a 'hate crime'.
But, supposing I'm Christian and I paint a hoax sign on my property that says, "We Jews hate Jesus and want to kill all you Christian scum", thus imply Jews are a hateful and hostile bunch, that only counts as 'disorderly conduct'?
There must be legislation that really throws the book at the likes of Smollett.Replies: @Altai, @John Milton's Ghost, @AndrewR, @Bill Jones
Speaking of hate crimes, there is a NYPD hate crime twitter account and a big running theme are attacks by black guys on Hasidic Jews.
Tweets by NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it’s long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.
Vincent Bugliosi said in his OJ book that you are basically allowed to get on the stand and lie in your self-defense. Prosecuting perjurers after they are convicted is usually considered unsporting, and prosecuting them after they are found innocent sounds like a tough row to hoe.
I suspect that prosecutors believe that encouraging the guilty to take the stand increases the chances of a guilty verdict, so they don’t want to discourage it.
I saw Vince on, I think, Larry King's show after the OJ criminal trial verdict. He said if there had been a hung jury and retrial, there was some talk of hiring Vincent Bugliosi as Special Prosecutor for the retrial.
Vince said, "I would have been willing to do it."
That's what happened with Smollett--A veteran former prosecutor was chosen when the Cook County State's Attorney refused to try Smollett.Replies: @Harry Baldwin
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction. That does seem unfair. It's sort of a mirror image of "right to remain silent" -- you shouldn't be doubly punished merely for testifying on your own behalf.Replies: @Jim, @Jack D, @Right_On
Do they match the look of Enrique Marqez, Jr.
https://calcoastnews.com/2015/12/former-neighbor-accused-of-supporting-san-bernardino-terrorists/
iSteve, didn’t you have a contest for the annual successor of Mr. Marqez as dumb criminal conspiracy patsy of the year, but for years there were no successful nominees?
He’s been serving time in white Amerikkka his whole life. That’s the real travesty.
In this case, not so much so. Community service. Probation. An awards ceremony. A nice write up in the New York Times. An exciting opportunity to appear in some gay television show.Replies: @Philbert Desanex, @Hibernian, @PaceLaw, @Escher
He may serve 30 days, or something like that, after the way he made a complete fool of himself, and took the judge and jury for complete fools, on the stand.
Jessie Smollett is one of those Negros who gives the good 5% a bad name. The Nigerians are the real victims here.
From The Manchurian Candidate.
I remember thinking at the time how strange it was that Harris was echoing the line from the movie so closely. In the movie, the people who say this have been brainwashed. I don’t think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.
Or maybe Kamala really is so dumb and lacking in self-awareness.Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Haxo Angmark
I think you're way overestimating the depth of that particular consciousness. You're making it sound like the Marianas Trench when it's more like a muddy puddle.Replies: @Jack D
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
Michael was whoever was giving Epstein his orders. Epstein was Fredo, right down to the ignominious disposal when he became inconvenient.
It’s most likely because it’s a first offense. I would have said that this would have been his sentence for sure but then he got up on the witness stand and lied like rug. Judges don’t like it when you lie to their face. So there’s at least a small chance that the judge is going to sentence him to prison to teach him not to get on the witness stand and lie some more when you are already on trial for lying.
The pessimist in me thinks he'll get a slap on the wrist, but one can hope the obviously perjured testimony will result in some time in protective custody (solitary confinement) since he's a gay "celebrity."
https://twitter.com/NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it's long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.Replies: @Thomas, @prosa123, @Negrolphin Pool, @AndrewR
I’m always a little surprised that the Hasidim in New York don’t protect themselves a little better. Years ago, on Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood, I witnessed a homeless drug addict smash a window of a Russian deli full of families. Within seconds, said homeless drug addict was facedown on the sidewalk with two large Hasidic men kneeling on him and the Shomrim and Hatzolah (Hasidic security and private ambulance services) appearing out of nowhere in about half the time it took for the police to show up. Maybe black New York hoodlums are more intimidating or are less deterrable.
Plus 300 hours community service. He’ll mentor big blackish theater boys in stage combat and stuff.
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN.
As if the Judge didn't get this from the actual depositions. Why is CNN employing this man ? Because he's an Affirmative pick dindu.Replies: @Squid, @Bugg, @R.G. Camara, @JimDandy
No depostions required of a defendant in a criminal case. In fact, 5th Amendment allows criminal defendants to not even make any statement.Burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove their case. Naturally though any defendant who takes the stand puts himself in the crosshairs.
Having misspent my youth toiling at the criminal bar, judges take a very dim view of defendants who lie through their teeth. Suspect it’s the problem with an actor being a defendant; thought simply playing a role well would carry the day. Also appears his attorneys did not grasp the pitfalls of letting a total narcissist testify. Explaining driving around Chicago smoking dope and visiting gay bathhouses with one of your paid assailants did not in any way dispprove the hate hoax conspiracy. Height of it was Smollett getting angry with the DA for reading his own texts verbatim with the “n” owrd out loud. As if somehow the prosecutor quoting his own vulgarity ws the worst crime imaginable.
Juicy Smo-le-ay is about to spend some time behind bars.
In Smollett's case, you can add gross stupidity to narcissism.
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
And yet everyone laughed at Lyndon Larouche. The Queen, an international racketeer! HAHAHAHA!
The
https://www.thoughtco.com/sapir-whorf-hypothesis-1691924
implies that if your mental repertoire lacks the category of “hate hoax”, you will have difficulty recognizing hate hoaxes as you encounter them; each instance will be sui generis, not another example of something you have seen before.
It’s little known that Jussie’s rehearsal for the incident was captured on a security camera:
I don’t think it’s his first offense. I read today that he has a prior no contest plea to giving a cop his brother’s name during a DUI stop in California.
The pessimist in me thinks he’ll get a slap on the wrist, but one can hope the obviously perjured testimony will result in some time in protective custody (solitary confinement) since he’s a gay “celebrity.”
Half black,half A Jew,and all gay. What could go wrong?
OT but one big story here in Chicago is the man who drove thru Chinatown and shot to death an old Chinese multiple times.
Race of the shooter? Trump supporter?
https://twitter.com/NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it's long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.Replies: @Thomas, @prosa123, @Negrolphin Pool, @AndrewR
Of the three main Hasidic groups in Brooklyn only the Lubavitch in Crown Heights (who are basically the “lite” version of the Hasidim) are close to bad areas. The Satmar in Williamsburg and especially the Bobover in Borough Park are in much better areas.
When a black say he was attacked by whites, he's not talking only of that crime. He's blaming the entire community of creating a climate for such a thing.
It's like that Jewish guy who made those bomb threats to synagogues. He was trying to create the impression that all these white 'antisemitic' Christians were out to get Jews.
Smollett was out to smear half of America that voted for Trump. Yet, he gets off with misdemeanors of 'disorderly conduct'? If anything, this was an orderly conspiracy.
Following the current logic, if I paint a swastika on a Jewish property, that is a 'hate crime'.
But, supposing I'm Christian and I paint a hoax sign on my property that says, "We Jews hate Jesus and want to kill all you Christian scum", thus imply Jews are a hateful and hostile bunch, that only counts as 'disorderly conduct'?
There must be legislation that really throws the book at the likes of Smollett.Replies: @Altai, @John Milton's Ghost, @AndrewR, @Bill Jones
I’ve long said that if our social and political leaders want to label racism, sexism, homophobia, or whatever is the Worst Thing Ever, then a hoax regarding these -isms must be treated with near equivalence in terms of legal consequence. Attempting to label someone as evil when they are not should be considered a vile act, when if it were true it would lead to ostracism, firing, divorce, shunning, or any number of other social deaths.
That sort of thinking, however, still assumes a sense of liberal belief that all individuals are equal before the law, and that rationality and reason aren’t just an oppressive tool of the West. Woke thinking assumes all whites are guilty, and whomever gets punished for it is just the accident of the moment. You always have it coming, whitey, so don’t complain when it does. And even if Jussie made this one up, you all really wanted to do it, so you’re still guilty.
Actually the last time I used it in front of another person was in 1976 and there is a possibility that all three of the other people in the room at the time have passed away even if they would have been capable of remembering it. If I am the only living witness would that even count?
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN.
As if the Judge didn't get this from the actual depositions. Why is CNN employing this man ? Because he's an Affirmative pick dindu.Replies: @Squid, @Bugg, @R.G. Camara, @JimDandy
Why is CNN employing this man ?
Because Jeffrey Toobin was out on a Zoom call. 🙂
He was obviously suffering from Toobin's Complaint.
Jussie, I sentence you to 2 years hard time, where you will share a cell with two large African men who love to lift weights and sodomize fairies.
I hope you learn your lesson!
In general, private security has a stronger effect on random homeless problems than on random “teen” problems.
While the homeless will be chased away, “teens” are more likely to take private security as a challenge to get around or goof on, especially since the teens don’t think private security will arrest them or hurt them like the cops could.
The fact that Jussie couldn’t find two white gay bodybuilders to fill the roles reflects poorly on his casting ability.
Also, we now have a more memetic, more publicly-known synonym for hate hoax: “Pulling a Jussie Smollett.”
Let’s see if it catches on.
I remember thinking at the time how strange it was that Harris was echoing the line from the movie so closely. In the movie, the people who say this have been brainwashed. I don't think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.Replies: @EdwardM, @Nicholas Stix, @Colin Wright
It would be funny if a staffer wrote that tweet to make fun of Kamala, maybe to retaliate after enduring one of her tirades.
Or maybe Kamala really is so dumb and lacking in self-awareness.
this is the same VP Kamala Harris
who left a bouquet of flowers
at the North Viet commemorative marker
for the shoot-down of McCain....because
she thought it was a memorial.
Not firmly planted at all. Already being pushed way down the pages by trivial celebrity news and when the verdict was announced, I checked Google News. It was the sixth story and four of the top five were variations on “white supremacy” and “systemic racism”.
What’s more, you can be permanently banned from MSM comment forums by mentioning that term in any context.
Jussie realized or should have realized that his hoax might have incited violent protests, locally or in many cities. And there might have been political consequences. The sentence should reflect this. The possible consequences of his hoax were not limited to career enhancement. In a way this resembles the sentencing of arsonists; they cannot be sure that their actions will be limited to burning down a building; occupants could die or firefighters could die. They are supposed to anticipate this and so the sentence is harsh, even when the extended consequences do not occur.
“White Males deserve to be chattel slaves as part of reparation to Black People!!!!!”
Blacks already prepared for this:
Covid or race reckoning?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-student-misbehavior-remote-learning-covid-11639061247?mod=mhp
Sending Smellit off to prison to do some hard time is like sending Squints off to CPR class as punishment for kissing the cute lifeguard.
He should do some serious time in prison.
But he probably won’t.
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
You didn’t say ‘Mossad’ or ‘the government of Israel’. So you end up obfuscating the issue and covering for two Mossad agents working their whole careers on the direct orders of the government of Israel.
You are also covering for the Jewish-American billionaires who funded/fronted for these Mossad agents carrying out the orders of the government of Israel (orders to pimp American girls in honey traps set for prominent men).
True.
In this case, not so much so. Community service. Probation. An awards ceremony. A nice write up in the New York Times. An exciting opportunity to appear in some gay television show.Replies: @Philbert Desanex, @Hibernian, @PaceLaw, @Escher
Ah Trelane, But what is a class 4 felony in Illinois as opposed to what is defined as a felony in Black’s Law dictionary? That’s the true question. Something tells me that jail time (probably under 16 months) will be called for.
False accusations are much more common then people realize particularly in the family court system. It is very easy to do and even when someone gets caught, they are rarely punished. That should tell you how flagrant this was. He might end up being the only person convicted of this crime in the last decade.
Lastly, it will be easy to hold up Jussie Smollett and waive him like a bloody shirt next time a talking head denies this exists. He will become a caricature not that he isn't already.
You can’t be charged until after you’ve committed the offense. And the prosecution can’t just add a charge in the middle of the trial.
Not surprised at all that Juicy got convicted. His story was too absurd and implausible for even a simple-minded Chicago
jury to believe. The laughable story comes down to the fact that this gay, nominally talented black actor thought that victimhood status was all that he needed to make it in today’s world. Shockingly, he was proved incorrect.
It would be true that they would have to file a new criminal charge for perjury; but nothing in the law precludes the inclusion of perjury in sentencing by the judge. Jack is right. When you lie to a judge they really don’t like that.
I think his defense lawyers might have some liability to suborning perjury by coaching him to lie. I’d appreciate any comments on that legal theory by the lawyers here.
He lied to the cops in California, and I hope that is put before the judge during sentencing.
He was caught giving a family member’s address, I think his brother’s, when he was pulled over for DUI in, I believe, Califonia. Don’t remember how long ago this was. It’ll probably be a minor factor, if it’s a factor at all.
https://twitter.com/NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it's long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.Replies: @Thomas, @prosa123, @Negrolphin Pool, @AndrewR
Is there a bail fund?
I hope you learn your lesson!Replies: @PaceLaw
So will this really be hard time for Juicy, or more of a spa, or bathhouse, visit for our young and vulnerable felon?
I remember Vincent Bugliosi’s OJ book. He said, in effect, guilty defendants will lie when they testify and it’s considered part of the game.
I saw Vince on, I think, Larry King’s show after the OJ criminal trial verdict. He said if there had been a hung jury and retrial, there was some talk of hiring Vincent Bugliosi as Special Prosecutor for the retrial.
Vince said, “I would have been willing to do it.”
That’s what happened with Smollett–A veteran former prosecutor was chosen when the Cook County State’s Attorney refused to try Smollett.
Or maybe he got tired of the vile, systematic (and often sexual) torture that is meted out by negroes upon white men in America’s prisons? But which is never acknowledged in the main stream media?
BTW, was there a multi-million dollar settlement for his family? Was Shaun King ever held accountable, in any way? Are all these questions inevitably rhetorical?
What Jussie did is a slap in the face to countless numbers of black people who concocted considerably less preposterous-sounding hate crime hoaxes. How can these activists ever hope to be taken seriously again?
OT: This just in!
San Francisco is still a well qualified Third World Shithole
chock full of horrible people! ☹️
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-looting-turned-san-francisco
As a non-lawyer, I find the title of the crime he committed, Disorderly Conduct, strangely named for a Felony. It sounds like what you’d be charged with if you had too much to drink and were making a scene on a public sidewalk.
You are also covering for the Jewish-American billionaires who funded/fronted for these Mossad agents carrying out the orders of the government of Israel (orders to pimp American girls in honey traps set for prominent men).Replies: @Reg Cæsar
For some obscure reason, you (and others here) don’t say “Mossad” or “the government of Israel” when– if– talking about the ACLU’s driving Christian prayer out of the public schools in the 1960s. Eventually they got even the watered-down “intelligent design” redefined as Christian prayer. That’s a pretty powerful fifth column.
We’ve come a long way since Commonwealth v Cooke. Either they’re against us, or they’re not. Make up your mind.
How many Canadian lives did Mossad mole Henry Morgentaler end up talking?
When a black say he was attacked by whites, he's not talking only of that crime. He's blaming the entire community of creating a climate for such a thing.
It's like that Jewish guy who made those bomb threats to synagogues. He was trying to create the impression that all these white 'antisemitic' Christians were out to get Jews.
Smollett was out to smear half of America that voted for Trump. Yet, he gets off with misdemeanors of 'disorderly conduct'? If anything, this was an orderly conspiracy.
Following the current logic, if I paint a swastika on a Jewish property, that is a 'hate crime'.
But, supposing I'm Christian and I paint a hoax sign on my property that says, "We Jews hate Jesus and want to kill all you Christian scum", thus imply Jews are a hateful and hostile bunch, that only counts as 'disorderly conduct'?
There must be legislation that really throws the book at the likes of Smollett.Replies: @Altai, @John Milton's Ghost, @AndrewR, @Bill Jones
For that legislation to be written and passed, we would have to live in a country ruled by people who don’t benefit from anti-white hate hoaxes and hate crimes.
“When you testify in a case, the judge now gets a sense of what you said,” Jackson told CNN.
As if the Judge didn't get this from the actual depositions. Why is CNN employing this man ? Because he's an Affirmative pick dindu.Replies: @Squid, @Bugg, @R.G. Camara, @JimDandy
Another take from CNN:
“Hannity, and other bad faith media personalities on the right, used Smollett’s conviction to (predictably) attack the news media and aim to delegitimize the credibility of the entire press.
The tactic is dishonest, yet simple: Take an actual act of deception, in this case one that was perpetrated by an actor and covered heavily by the press, and then use it to suggest that anything reported by mainstream sources cannot be trusted. Everything is a hoax.”
I remember thinking at the time how strange it was that Harris was echoing the line from the movie so closely. In the movie, the people who say this have been brainwashed. I don't think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.Replies: @EdwardM, @Nicholas Stix, @Colin Wright
Apparently, some monkeys can randomly type out the complete works of Shakespeare, given a little more time than Kamala.
“Prosecuting perjurers after they are convicted is usually considered unsporting.”
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction. That does seem unfair. It’s sort of a mirror image of “right to remain silent” — you shouldn’t be doubly punished merely for testifying on your own behalf.
I would say though that the jury convicting you the 1st time is pretty strong evidence that you were lying. Are you saying that you have a license to lie freely under oath in your own defense and should never be prosecuted? You have the right to testify TRUTHFULLY, not to lie your ass off. You have no Constitutional right to lie under oath. Jussie got up there on the stand and told a cock and bull story again, except this time he was under oath and telling it to a judge and jury. I don't see why he should get a free pass for this.
As Steve says, prosecutors don't want to discourage defendants from testifying because it often (as in this case) backfires and helps the prosecution, especially if they are actually guilty. The prosecution's fondest wish (which is not often granted because of the right to remain silent) is often to get the defendant on the stand so they can poke holes in his story. So they don't prosecute perjury as a practical matter. But they could as a matter of law.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
When you enter a plea of not guilty at the start of a trial you are not under oath, so can't later be charged with perjury. Also, for a defendant to be found guilty, The Prosecution has to prove its case "beyond reasonable doubt". You could later say that your not-guilty plea simply meant you didn't think the case against you was strong enough to result in a conviction!
Are there any synagogue problems between the three?
I used to work for an Orthodox Jewish gun nut in Los Angeles. He told me it was easy to conceal a full size Colt Govt .45 Auto under one of those big coats. His wife carried a single action .41 Magnum in a big purse. (I know, a ridiculous choice) He said the cops never gave a thought to checking them out.
Unlike Fake Vice President Kamala Harris, I actually know how to say “Kamala.”
For many years, I had an Indian Aunt Kamala by marriage in Trinidad, may she rest in peace. (My late father-in-law’s kid sister.)
Someone in the Howie Hawkins Wisconsin campaign mistakenly put down a business address rather than a residence when applying for ballot status. Kanye West’s rep arrived less than a minute late for the same thing.
“It’ll probably be a minor factor, if it’s a factor at all.”
This was enough to keep both men off the ballot, and throw the state to Biden. At least virtually.
Conspiracy, criminal incitement, and federal hate crime.
Oh, and make him civilly liable for every black-on-White, Jew-on-White
and homo-on-White violent incident for as long as the sordid coverage lasts.
I hadn’t really thought this scurrilous liar would be convicted on any charges, although I didn’t follow the trashy trial closely. I thought there would either be a complete acquittal or a hung jury. But I did follow the original incident closely. Recall that I live in downtown Chicago: I knew immediately that this story was a hoax. In fact this story is what sent me searching online to find what little objective coverage there was. Thank you, Steve Sailer, for staying with this story in 2019 when few others did. I myself don’t want the lying actor to go to jail, but I would like for him to pay the city at least \$1 million and never work as an actor again.
I would have predicted that Smollett wouldn’t have gone to trial. Or, at best, found innocent. I would have been friggin’ wrong. So that’s neat.
Maybe he’ll get off on appeal?
And then there were the multiple cases of lying to the police and perjury in the Darren Wilson (Ferguson) trial, that were never prosecuted.
Early on, Kim Foxx the Chicago DA declined to prosecute Smollett. So what happened to bring his prosecution about after all?
If you are a student and only read one thing on the Internet today, make it this: https://abigailshrier.substack.com/p/what-i-told-the-students-of-princeton
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Bill in Glendale, @International Jew, @AnotherDad, @Muggles
Why don’t black people get tattooed in a color of ink that contrasts better with their skin? Considering the expense, it seems a waste if people can hardly make out the art work.
Eureka, Bro. that seems like a BILLION dollar startup for a bright Khazarim such as yourself!
I remember thinking at the time how strange it was that Harris was echoing the line from the movie so closely. In the movie, the people who say this have been brainwashed. I don't think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.Replies: @EdwardM, @Nicholas Stix, @Colin Wright
‘I don’t think that Harris was INTENTIONALLY trying to signal to us that she was brainwashed but maybe on some unconscious level she made a Kinsley gaffe.’
I think you’re way overestimating the depth of that particular consciousness. You’re making it sound like the Marianas Trench when it’s more like a muddy puddle.
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction. That does seem unfair. It's sort of a mirror image of "right to remain silent" -- you shouldn't be doubly punished merely for testifying on your own behalf.Replies: @Jim, @Jack D, @Right_On
A defendant is not required to testify.
Off Topic: New York City will allow non-citizens to vote in municipal elections.
https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2021/12/09/new-york-becomes-largest-city-to-grant-vote-to-noncitizens-1399231
So the wokesters must be ecstatic at enfranchising all these foreigners, right? Actually, a bunch of Democrats are against it. Not because they care about the rights of American citizens, but because letting foreigners vote might dilute the influence of the most sacred group of all.
In this case, not so much so. Community service. Probation. An awards ceremony. A nice write up in the New York Times. An exciting opportunity to appear in some gay television show.Replies: @Philbert Desanex, @Hibernian, @PaceLaw, @Escher
According to Black law a felony is a minimum requirement to graduate to the next level in da hood.
https://twitter.com/NYPDHateCrimes
The conflict between the clannish anti-social Hasidim and poor blacks they displace with their every growing numbers and terra-forming of spaces such as converting apartment buildings to suite Hasidic dictats and preferentially letting to them is one which receives almost no media coverage despite it's long standing nature.
These kinds of random attacks are territory-marking behaviour.Replies: @Thomas, @prosa123, @Negrolphin Pool, @AndrewR
Based blacks
The phrase “fake hate crime” appears in a New York Times headline!
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/09/arts/television/jussie-smollett-guilty.html
Will “hate hoax” come next?
It was clearly an anti-Semitic jury.
His tattoos likely stood out more when they were fresh. Light colors would fade even faster. You’d think darker skinned guys would figure out they’re a bad investment.
I think history should record that I came up with the fakenoose hashtag.
“the wrongfully-accused white burglar hung himself in jail 5 months after 2 black guys were arrested for her murder”
Got any links for this story? I had no idea there was a story here apart from mistaken identity gang stuff. Are you saying they found a Great White Defendant?
Good point. I think gold ink would look good as a contrast.
The worst thing about this is it actually went to trial. In a functioning legal system Smollett and the prosecution would have negotiated a solution that would have avoided the silly trial. Admitting guilt and some sort of symbolic punishment like community service and as he might have some wealth a fine.
The most interesting thing was that he refused to hand over his phone, and that he got all those high-ranking political and celeb endorsements. I imagine there must have been some interesting texts, especially as there was some ludicrous ‘anti-lynching’ bill going through. Who knows if Jussie was trying to help the politicians, or if they told him to do it.
A retired judge petitioned for a Special Prosecutor and the petition was granted.
When a Soros DA won't prosecute, can there be a Special Prosecutor petition? If so, who can petition and who has to approve?Replies: @Hibernian
Agree Farenheit, ironically Jussie here has moved the ball forward for team sanity.
But the problem is “Why did we even need this to get “hate hoax” out there?”
Why was Trump responding to Biden and Harris with “this smells like yet another hate-hoax” and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris immediately respond by slandering white Americans.”
Our problem is that we don’t have “conservative” politicians who are saying “yet another hate-hoax” and “yet another blood libel”…
We do not have conservative politicians who speak simple basic truths:
— “Different people, different groups of people have different genes and cultures and will have different outcomes in life. The Democrats blaming those on white people is the worst sort of toxic politics.”
— “Diversity is not a strength but a source of contention and conflict.”
— “Immigration is population replacement.”
— “Immigration without end, mathematically means the America your children, grandchildren, your posterity inherit, will get progressively more crowded, more contentious, more unpleasant, more impoverished … until it’s so unpleasant that no one else wants to come. That’s what the Democrats want for your kids.”
— “Deplorable white people are not the property of minorities. But like anyone else entitled to live as they wish, with whom they wish, according to their own norms values and culture.”
— “If we no longer share traditional American norms, values, traditions, holidays, heroes, history, our culture. No longer agree on our public norms and culture, then we are not one nation, and should peacefully separate.”
Jussie’s a propaganda win. But our problem is we do not have conservative politicians who are even fighting. We don’t have conservatives who are actually trying to conserve anything.
I disagree somewhat and here's why. Immediately after the initial noose incident, pretty much the entire Chicago political Machine came out in support of Smellit, and because his allegations were so utterly ridiculous, it ended up being a huge embarrassment for Fox, Lightfoot, and all of the other negro bosses in Cook County. One does not simply throw egg in the face of the Machine and walk away unscathed. The guilty verdict was retribution to It. So he will accept his public shaming, receive probation, and sanity will continue to ebb away.
If you would shut up you might even be able to get them to vote with you but you are so busy denouncing them that they are going to be pushed into the arms of the Democrats despite the fact that they have a natural dislike of blacks and baizuos.Replies: @Moses, @Mr. Anon
https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2021/12/09/new-york-becomes-largest-city-to-grant-vote-to-noncitizens-1399231
So the wokesters must be ecstatic at enfranchising all these foreigners, right? Actually, a bunch of Democrats are against it. Not because they care about the rights of American citizens, but because letting foreigners vote might dilute the influence of the most sacred group of all.Replies: @Hibernian
I’m sure the election personnel in NYC are going to scrupulously keep separate voting rolls for municipal and non-municipal elections.
Re: Kamala and Joe tweets
They may be entirely unable to spot obvious BS, in which case our nation is in a very dangerous position. Alternatively, they knew this was BS but played the crowd. I’m not sure which is worse, but both are really, really bad looks for senior leaders.
In contrast, go back and read the though process Steve went through before calling out the VA Tech initiation rape on glass hoax. On it’s face it had to be a hoax, or at best the actual facts were mangled beyond recognition. And yet Steve didn’t call out hoax immediately. He showed self awareness of his own biases and thought it through beyond reasonable doubt. I cautioned several people not to believe everything they see on the news, but didn’t bother to tweet.
BTW, Smollette is far from being the first celebrity to stage this sort of hoax. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/morton-downey-jrs-america_b_3408297
But in the day, the fact that Morton Downey Jr.’s swastika didn’t pass the sniff test was called out pretty quickly by media.
Cause they don’t want to look stupid, like all the low IQ white people covered with these ugly tattoos?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2l6JUNFAJ9o
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Bill in Glendale, @International Jew, @AnotherDad, @Muggles
So of all the other 7 billion people in the world ..
our immigration policy selects out these as people we need to add to America.
Given what happens in prison, wouldn’t prison time be a reward for Smollett rather than a punishment?
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction. That does seem unfair. It's sort of a mirror image of "right to remain silent" -- you shouldn't be doubly punished merely for testifying on your own behalf.Replies: @Jim, @Jack D, @Right_On
No one said anything about automatically. The prosecutor has to exercise his discretion whether to charge you with the new crime of perjury and you would have to be tried again and convicted by a separate jury of that.
I would say though that the jury convicting you the 1st time is pretty strong evidence that you were lying. Are you saying that you have a license to lie freely under oath in your own defense and should never be prosecuted? You have the right to testify TRUTHFULLY, not to lie your ass off. You have no Constitutional right to lie under oath. Jussie got up there on the stand and told a cock and bull story again, except this time he was under oath and telling it to a judge and jury. I don’t see why he should get a free pass for this.
As Steve says, prosecutors don’t want to discourage defendants from testifying because it often (as in this case) backfires and helps the prosecution, especially if they are actually guilty. The prosecution’s fondest wish (which is not often granted because of the right to remain silent) is often to get the defendant on the stand so they can poke holes in his story. So they don’t prosecute perjury as a practical matter. But they could as a matter of law.
With that said, I can see where this case may be the rare one where it's appropriate to double-dip with an add-on perjury charge because: (a) the perjury offense may be more serious than the underlying crimes he was tried for in the first place; (b) lying to the police (not under oath) was the original offense; and (c) his lies are so preposterous.
But what if a second jury decides he didn't commit perjury when he told his preposterous story and that the first jury was wrong to disbelieve him? That would be awkward for the prosecutors.Replies: @Bill Jones
But the problem is "Why did we even need this to get "hate hoax" out there?"
Why was Trump responding to Biden and Harris with "this smells like yet another hate-hoax" and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris immediately respond by slandering white Americans."
Our problem is that we don't have "conservative" politicians who are saying "yet another hate-hoax" and "yet another blood libel"...
We do not have conservative politicians who speak simple basic truths:
-- "Different people, different groups of people have different genes and cultures and will have different outcomes in life. The Democrats blaming those on white people is the worst sort of toxic politics."
-- "Diversity is not a strength but a source of contention and conflict."
-- "Immigration is population replacement."
-- "Immigration without end, mathematically means the America your children, grandchildren, your posterity inherit, will get progressively more crowded, more contentious, more unpleasant, more impoverished ... until it's so unpleasant that no one else wants to come. That's what the Democrats want for your kids."
-- "Deplorable white people are not the property of minorities. But like anyone else entitled to live as they wish, with whom they wish, according to their own norms values and culture."
-- "If we no longer share traditional American norms, values, traditions, holidays, heroes, history, our culture. No longer agree on our public norms and culture, then we are not one nation, and should peacefully separate."
Jussie's a propaganda win. But our problem is we do not have conservative politicians who are even fighting. We don't have conservatives who are actually trying to conserve anything.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Jack D
“Agree Farenheit, ironically Jussie here has moved the ball forward for team sanity.”
I disagree somewhat and here’s why. Immediately after the initial noose incident, pretty much the entire Chicago political Machine came out in support of Smellit, and because his allegations were so utterly ridiculous, it ended up being a huge embarrassment for Fox, Lightfoot, and all of the other negro bosses in Cook County. One does not simply throw egg in the face of the Machine and walk away unscathed. The guilty verdict was retribution to It. So he will accept his public shaming, receive probation, and sanity will continue to ebb away.
Fredo was not killed when he became inconvenient. That happened years before. He was killed because their mom had finally died and Michael could kill him without her knowing about it. Also the mafia is hardly in the same league as Mossad, CIA, and MI6. Kind of like the Detroit Lions and the New England Patriots if you want to use silly analogies.
But the problem is "Why did we even need this to get "hate hoax" out there?"
Why was Trump responding to Biden and Harris with "this smells like yet another hate-hoax" and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris immediately respond by slandering white Americans."
Our problem is that we don't have "conservative" politicians who are saying "yet another hate-hoax" and "yet another blood libel"...
We do not have conservative politicians who speak simple basic truths:
-- "Different people, different groups of people have different genes and cultures and will have different outcomes in life. The Democrats blaming those on white people is the worst sort of toxic politics."
-- "Diversity is not a strength but a source of contention and conflict."
-- "Immigration is population replacement."
-- "Immigration without end, mathematically means the America your children, grandchildren, your posterity inherit, will get progressively more crowded, more contentious, more unpleasant, more impoverished ... until it's so unpleasant that no one else wants to come. That's what the Democrats want for your kids."
-- "Deplorable white people are not the property of minorities. But like anyone else entitled to live as they wish, with whom they wish, according to their own norms values and culture."
-- "If we no longer share traditional American norms, values, traditions, holidays, heroes, history, our culture. No longer agree on our public norms and culture, then we are not one nation, and should peacefully separate."
Jussie's a propaganda win. But our problem is we do not have conservative politicians who are even fighting. We don't have conservatives who are actually trying to conserve anything.Replies: @Mike Tre, @Jack D
You keep doing this – Jussie was a Black thang and you keep changing the subject to immigration. Virtually all hate hoaxes involve blacks and not immigrants. The only kind of diversity this implicates is blacks (“diversity” BTW is code for black and not anything else most of the time). The whole BLM thing, the current crime wave, the massive spending Biden is proposing, the dismantling of historical monuments, the retconning of blacks into history, everything is about blacks and nothing but blacks so stop taking it out on Rajiv and Jose who have nothing to do with it.
If you would shut up you might even be able to get them to vote with you but you are so busy denouncing them that they are going to be pushed into the arms of the Democrats despite the fact that they have a natural dislike of blacks and baizuos.
You keep doing this - counseling that we must accept immigration. It's inevitable, so you say, we should just accept the rigged game that has been prepared for us.
I don't think I'd want you for my lawyer.Replies: @Jack D
So…
Hayden Monahan must have…learned his lesson?
Poor little Jussie had to hire a couple of Nigerian rent boys to do the job Americans just won’t do?
This instance of a member of the Diversity-American Community getting hammered by The Man can stand as a point on the downwardly sloping graph of our society: once upon a time it was The Juice; now it’s just Juicy.
(JoooooSeeeee! Cho got some Splay-Nin to do!)
If you would shut up you might even be able to get them to vote with you but you are so busy denouncing them that they are going to be pushed into the arms of the Democrats despite the fact that they have a natural dislike of blacks and baizuos.Replies: @Moses, @Mr. Anon
Lol. You are funny Jack D.
Browns and Blacks will NEVER vote GOP. NEVER. It’s just not a thing. Never will be.
Blacks vote 9:1 Dem. Asians like 3:1. Hispanics similar. Will never change.
Polls on things like “support free speech” show that only a majority of Whites support it. Blacks and Browns do not support free speech, never have.
It’s almost as if the Constitution was written by and for a certain people (Whites) that valued certain things, and is not a suitable value system or government for other peoples.
Weird.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/hispanic-voters-now-evenly-split-between-parties-wsj-poll-finds-11638972769Replies: @Moses
Sir Charles, for one, was not fooled:
None of the normies I talked to about this case when it happened believed Smollett’s story. Some of these people had fallen for other hate hoaxes. How stupid of the Democratic party establishment to rush to support the cause of such an obvious lie. It really reinforces the idea they are afraid of their base.
I saw Vince on, I think, Larry King's show after the OJ criminal trial verdict. He said if there had been a hung jury and retrial, there was some talk of hiring Vincent Bugliosi as Special Prosecutor for the retrial.
Vince said, "I would have been willing to do it."
That's what happened with Smollett--A veteran former prosecutor was chosen when the Cook County State's Attorney refused to try Smollett.Replies: @Harry Baldwin
Uhh, if you read a little about Vincent Bugliosi, you’ll find he has no credibility at all. Tom O’Neill discusses him in his book Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties. Or just listen to Joe Rogan’s lengthy interview with O’Neill.
Sure sure Charlie was out there. Not saying he wasn't an...odd bird but he wasn't as bad as they made him out to be.
That's all I'm saying. I imagine most of us have prolly known someone worse. The good Lord knows i have. Eh, Charlie wasn't that bad. Not as bad as they said anyway.
Given the sheer incompetence of the LA DA's office (starting with the choice of venue and jury selection - the case was lost even before it began) it's not hard to believe that Bugliosi could have done a better job if there had been a retrial. But their incompetence was of such a magnitude that they couldn't even get 1 vote to convict despite the fact that it was frickin' obvious that OJ done it.Replies: @David In TN
https://youtu.be/r1hv5P4SwbU
If you would shut up you might even be able to get them to vote with you but you are so busy denouncing them that they are going to be pushed into the arms of the Democrats despite the fact that they have a natural dislike of blacks and baizuos.Replies: @Moses, @Mr. Anon
And the second largest group of hate-hoax perpetrators appear to be……………… ah, well, never mind.
You keep doing this – counseling that we must accept immigration. It’s inevitable, so you say, we should just accept the rigged game that has been prepared for us.
I don’t think I’d want you for my lawyer.
But Jewish immigration was (mostly) over 100 years ago, so again it has nothing to do with modern day immigration.Replies: @Mr. Anon
Dave C doing what he does best: Keepin’ It Real!
It’s now official: the acronym PoS means ‘Piece of Smollet!’
When a black say he was attacked by whites, he's not talking only of that crime. He's blaming the entire community of creating a climate for such a thing.
It's like that Jewish guy who made those bomb threats to synagogues. He was trying to create the impression that all these white 'antisemitic' Christians were out to get Jews.
Smollett was out to smear half of America that voted for Trump. Yet, he gets off with misdemeanors of 'disorderly conduct'? If anything, this was an orderly conspiracy.
Following the current logic, if I paint a swastika on a Jewish property, that is a 'hate crime'.
But, supposing I'm Christian and I paint a hoax sign on my property that says, "We Jews hate Jesus and want to kill all you Christian scum", thus imply Jews are a hateful and hostile bunch, that only counts as 'disorderly conduct'?
There must be legislation that really throws the book at the likes of Smollett.Replies: @Altai, @John Milton's Ghost, @AndrewR, @Bill Jones
Didn’t he contribute 15,000 percent to Anti-Semitic crime ?
His some thousands plus compared to the 5 or 6 “real” ones?
White Tattoo Ink!
Eureka, Bro. that seems like a BILLION dollar startup for a bright Khazarim such as yourself!
Actually, don’t be fooled, a lot of them are quite brilliant…
Seems like the Hasidim did a pretty good job protecting themselves In the example you gave, What did you mean by Hasidim need to do a better job protecting themselves?
I’d love to hear Steve’s analysis about state governments divesting from American companies
Is this an Illinois thing or nationwide?
When a Soros DA won’t prosecute, can there be a Special Prosecutor petition? If so, who can petition and who has to approve?
He got Charlie all wrong. Charlie wasn’t as nearly as bad as they said. He was good with a catchy tune and he overstood what needed to be done, what was necessary if you will.
Sure sure Charlie was out there. Not saying he wasn’t an…odd bird but he wasn’t as bad as they made him out to be.
That’s all I’m saying. I imagine most of us have prolly known someone worse. The good Lord knows i have. Eh, Charlie wasn’t that bad. Not as bad as they said anyway.
I would say though that the jury convicting you the 1st time is pretty strong evidence that you were lying. Are you saying that you have a license to lie freely under oath in your own defense and should never be prosecuted? You have the right to testify TRUTHFULLY, not to lie your ass off. You have no Constitutional right to lie under oath. Jussie got up there on the stand and told a cock and bull story again, except this time he was under oath and telling it to a judge and jury. I don't see why he should get a free pass for this.
As Steve says, prosecutors don't want to discourage defendants from testifying because it often (as in this case) backfires and helps the prosecution, especially if they are actually guilty. The prosecution's fondest wish (which is not often granted because of the right to remain silent) is often to get the defendant on the stand so they can poke holes in his story. So they don't prosecute perjury as a practical matter. But they could as a matter of law.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
I am not saying you have a constitutional right to perjury. It’s just a practical/fairness issue and the recognition that every loss at trial represents a jury’s rejection of your story. We’ve seen perjury/lying charges weaponized as “process crimes” that can be charged over any factual discrepancies. So they are ripe for abuse.
With that said, I can see where this case may be the rare one where it’s appropriate to double-dip with an add-on perjury charge because: (a) the perjury offense may be more serious than the underlying crimes he was tried for in the first place; (b) lying to the police (not under oath) was the original offense; and (c) his lies are so preposterous.
But what if a second jury decides he didn’t commit perjury when he told his preposterous story and that the first jury was wrong to disbelieve him? That would be awkward for the prosecutors.
https://nypost.com/2013/06/28/trayvon-martins-girlfriend-admits-she-cant-read-the-letter-she-supposedly-wrote-to-his-mother-about-his-death/
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/04/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-100-million-fraud-diamond-rachel/A fraud that the DA was openly complicit in, both he and the ho should be in jail.Back in the before times of 1990 the Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter lying before Congress, pretending to be a nurses aid in Kuwait City watching Iraqi soldiers throw newborns on the floor so they could steal the incubators was worthy of prosecution but wasn't because
1. Diplomatic immunity.
2. Everyone in DC wanted the war and the perjury before Congress was for the Stupid American Public, so who cares?https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Nayirah_al-%E1%B9%A2aba%E1%B8%A5
Hill and Knowlton, BTW, the New York PR firm who arranged the perjury, is now helping the WHO craft its Covid message to, you've guessed it, the Stupid American Public.https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-world-health-organization-hired-a-top-pr-firm-to-fight-covid-smears-in-the-usC'est la vie.Replies: @Yngvar
Sure Bugliosi is a bit of a blow hard who overstates his accomplishments. This doesn’t mean that he has zero credibility.
Given the sheer incompetence of the LA DA’s office (starting with the choice of venue and jury selection – the case was lost even before it began) it’s not hard to believe that Bugliosi could have done a better job if there had been a retrial. But their incompetence was of such a magnitude that they couldn’t even get 1 vote to convict despite the fact that it was frickin’ obvious that OJ done it.
Unilever is a Dutch company, not an American one.
Btw - Unilever is Dutch and British, not just Dutch.
You’re welcome.
You keep doing this - counseling that we must accept immigration. It's inevitable, so you say, we should just accept the rigged game that has been prepared for us.
I don't think I'd want you for my lawyer.Replies: @Jack D
I assume you mean Jews. There was some Jewish (Israeli?) kid who was calling in a bunch of fake bomb threats that skewed the statistics so you may be right.
But Jewish immigration was (mostly) over 100 years ago, so again it has nothing to do with modern day immigration.
This was in Los Angeles, not New York. What I don’t get is why the Hasidim in Brooklyn consistently have more trouble with blacks.
Wild stuff. Especially Manson’s involvement with the CIA’s LSD experiments and how he may have been a government informant/asset.
“The New York Times, for instance, has never even printed the term “hate hoax.”
And that’s still true, almost three years later.”
On February 22, 2019, NYTimes had a headline “Hate Crime Hoaxes …”.
FAMOUS ACTOR’S A DUD ON THE STAND
Wrote critics as Jussie was panned.
Robert Burns, write the rest:
“Neither hoax nor a nest
Always gang as wee beasties had planned.”
Unfortunately, in Woke America “Keepin’ It Real” has its price.
Jussie gave the game away early on when he claimed that his assailants were wearing “MAGA hats.” I mean, really, credit people with at least SOME intelligence!
Raise a glass to the worthy Black juror
Who stood firm for the facts ‘midst the furor.
Lady Justice, though ill,
Has some life in her still;
With physicians as this we may cure ‘er.
Having misspent my youth toiling at the criminal bar, judges take a very dim view of defendants who lie through their teeth. Suspect it's the problem with an actor being a defendant; thought simply playing a role well would carry the day. Also appears his attorneys did not grasp the pitfalls of letting a total narcissist testify. Explaining driving around Chicago smoking dope and visiting gay bathhouses with one of your paid assailants did not in any way dispprove the hate hoax conspiracy. Height of it was Smollett getting angry with the DA for reading his own texts verbatim with the "n" owrd out loud. As if somehow the prosecutor quoting his own vulgarity ws the worst crime imaginable.
Juicy Smo-le-ay is about to spend some time behind bars.Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Curle
Mea culpa. I should have said witness statements and testimonies. For some obscure reason, I thought it was a civil case. Maybe because I thought Smollett could not be so stupid to take the stand in a criminal case.
In Smollett’s case, you can add gross stupidity to narcissism.
LOL
He was obviously suffering from Toobin’s Complaint.
Hispanic Voters Now Evenly Split Between Parties, WSJ Poll Finds
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/hispanic-voters-now-evenly-split-between-parties-wsj-poll-finds-11638972769
https://i.ibb.co/c8XRyKv/1726-F6-B3-CCA5-4731-9-AA8-B296-C3-CA23-AC.png
From: https://www.statista.com/statistics/631236/voter-turnout-of-the-exit-polls-of-the-2016-elections-by-race/
Some posters here seem to not understand the concept of “reduced charges”. Disorderly conduct is the lightest thing they could charge him with. El fix was in.
It’s Chicago, Jake.
But I have to note, Negros really seem to like their nooses and their bananas. Sure signs of a hoax.
I think you're way overestimating the depth of that particular consciousness. You're making it sound like the Marianas Trench when it's more like a muddy puddle.Replies: @Jack D
I agree but it’s still strange. Was it just a coincidence that she repeated the line from the movie almost verbatim? Did she vaguely remember the line (the way that Biden “remembered” Kinnock’s speech) but didn’t remember that it was made in the context of brainwashing? How did those words get from Hollwood 1962 to Kamala’s mouth?
Cup-bearer for Don Lemon?
But hey, enough of that, let the BLM riots begin! Another Miracle Mile Kristallnacht and inventory-reduction event is in order to express da peeplz's righteous anger!Replies: @bruce county
Maybe not… Its getting pretty cold in the evenings in Chicago.
That sort of thinking, however, still assumes a sense of liberal belief that all individuals are equal before the law, and that rationality and reason aren't just an oppressive tool of the West. Woke thinking assumes all whites are guilty, and whomever gets punished for it is just the accident of the moment. You always have it coming, whitey, so don't complain when it does. And even if Jussie made this one up, you all really wanted to do it, so you're still guilty.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
This is Spike Lee’s claim. We have all used the N word.
Actually the last time I used it in front of another person was in 1976 and there is a possibility that all three of the other people in the room at the time have passed away even if they would have been capable of remembering it. If I am the only living witness would that even count?
With that said, I can see where this case may be the rare one where it's appropriate to double-dip with an add-on perjury charge because: (a) the perjury offense may be more serious than the underlying crimes he was tried for in the first place; (b) lying to the police (not under oath) was the original offense; and (c) his lies are so preposterous.
But what if a second jury decides he didn't commit perjury when he told his preposterous story and that the first jury was wrong to disbelieve him? That would be awkward for the prosecutors.Replies: @Bill Jones
The big perjury crime that was never prosecuted was the witness who was supposedly Trayvon Martin’s girlfriend in the Zimmerman trial.
https://www.thetrayvonhoax.com/
https://nypost.com/2013/06/28/trayvon-martins-girlfriend-admits-she-cant-read-the-letter-she-supposedly-wrote-to-his-mother-about-his-death/
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/04/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-100-million-fraud-diamond-rachel/
A fraud that the DA was openly complicit in, both he and the ho should be in jail.
Back in the before times of 1990 the Kuwaiti Ambassador’s daughter lying before Congress, pretending to be a nurses aid in Kuwait City watching Iraqi soldiers throw newborns on the floor so they could steal the incubators was worthy of prosecution but wasn’t because
1. Diplomatic immunity.
2. Everyone in DC wanted the war and the perjury before Congress was for the Stupid American Public, so who cares?
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Nayirah_al-%E1%B9%A2aba%E1%B8%A5
Hill and Knowlton, BTW, the New York PR firm who arranged the perjury, is now helping the WHO craft its Covid message to, you’ve guessed it, the Stupid American Public.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-world-health-organization-hired-a-top-pr-firm-to-fight-covid-smears-in-the-us
C’est la vie.
I can’t prove it, but I think the Nigerian body builders clinched it with the jury, at some level. This is not a good look.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Bill in Glendale, @International Jew, @AnotherDad, @Muggles
In my limited experience black Africans don’t have the same “poor me, hate whitey” bias that all too many American blacks have.
Living in a black country/continent tends to negate any US MSM media bias about the issue.
Those Nigerian bros are probably heroes back home. I don’t think pale skinned gay American semi black actors get a lot of African respect when pulling off a stupid hoax attempt.
Let’s face it, “Jussie” is an embarrassment to everyone with two brain cells.
While real attorneys for him would have insisted on a plea deal, Jussie may have concluded that post-conviction and a few months in the slam (mainly away from dangerous fellow blacks who don’t like fag brothers) he believes it will only add to his marketability.
His name will be well known and after all, in show biz, name recognition is king. He’ll probably be on Dancing With the Stars next year.
https://threadreaders.com/thread/1085552242512412672
A couple of black American comedians have a Jussie Smollett series on YouTube. They’re funny but their manner isn’t very Nigerian. You can hear their Ebonic-American accent with the sound muted. Different body language entirely.
Somewhat off topic:
In trying to find out details of the earlier today story “Capitol Hill Aide Arrested Carrying Gun” I encountered the usual Soviet journalism absence of relevant facts.
None of the stories (even via numerous google searches) showed a photo of said aide (one Jeffrey Allsbrooks) or indicated what race he is.
Also, it took the ever vigilant Capitol Hill cops manning the security scanners at least 4 minutes to track Mr. Allsbrooks down after someone spotted his pistol in his briefcase. Again, no info on race there either.
In pre Woke times this would be unnoticed and unremarkable. But now, it raises “red flags.”
Mr. Allsbrooks is a low level “Administration” aide with a primary degree from some small technical school. We know most Capital Hill cops are minority politically influential hires.
Maybe no blacks (Blacks!) were involved. But again, this story has disappeared by mid day on Friday.
So we can be reassured that no White Supremacists were involved. Probably. I think that would have been part of the first paragraph, along with photos of him in all of the stories. Probably suggesting he was a Trump era hire.
Anyone want to take odds?
(Personally, it don’t think this gun carry is a big deal. There is a Second Amendment, still…)
Living in a black country/continent tends to negate any US MSM media bias about the issue.
Those Nigerian bros are probably heroes back home. I don't think pale skinned gay American semi black actors get a lot of African respect when pulling off a stupid hoax attempt.
Let's face it, "Jussie" is an embarrassment to everyone with two brain cells.
While real attorneys for him would have insisted on a plea deal, Jussie may have concluded that post-conviction and a few months in the slam (mainly away from dangerous fellow blacks who don't like fag brothers) he believes it will only add to his marketability.
His name will be well known and after all, in show biz, name recognition is king. He'll probably be on Dancing With the Stars next year.Replies: @SafeNow, @West reanimator
All true about his personal career, but the other part of this is that he might have ignited violent protests in cities. For risking that consequence, he deserves a harsh sentence. this is like arsonists deserve a harsh sentence because they can’t be sure they will “just” burn down the building, occupants or firefighters might die.
Except for Meryl Street and a few others, most American actresses do. (And yes, I know Page is Canadian.)
Or maybe Kamala really is so dumb and lacking in self-awareness.Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Haxo Angmark
Bingo.
Living in a black country/continent tends to negate any US MSM media bias about the issue.
Those Nigerian bros are probably heroes back home. I don't think pale skinned gay American semi black actors get a lot of African respect when pulling off a stupid hoax attempt.
Let's face it, "Jussie" is an embarrassment to everyone with two brain cells.
While real attorneys for him would have insisted on a plea deal, Jussie may have concluded that post-conviction and a few months in the slam (mainly away from dangerous fellow blacks who don't like fag brothers) he believes it will only add to his marketability.
His name will be well known and after all, in show biz, name recognition is king. He'll probably be on Dancing With the Stars next year.Replies: @SafeNow, @West reanimator
You crackers are so naive…
https://threadreaders.com/thread/1085552242512412672
Or maybe Kamala really is so dumb and lacking in self-awareness.Replies: @Paperback Writer, @Haxo Angmark
“really is so dumb and lacking…”. Remember,
this is the same VP Kamala Harris
who left a bouquet of flowers
at the North Viet commemorative marker
for the shoot-down of McCain….because
she thought it was a memorial.
Given the sheer incompetence of the LA DA's office (starting with the choice of venue and jury selection - the case was lost even before it began) it's not hard to believe that Bugliosi could have done a better job if there had been a retrial. But their incompetence was of such a magnitude that they couldn't even get 1 vote to convict despite the fact that it was frickin' obvious that OJ done it.Replies: @David In TN
“Sure Bugliosi is a bit of a blow hard who overstates his accomplishments. This doesn’t mean he has zero credibility.”
I basically agree. Bugliosi was a very good trial lawyer but Manson wasn’t as hard to convict as Vince claimed. You’ve got the same kind of clowns who think the CIA and/or Israel killed JFK declaring Charles Manson to be innocent.
The main attorney for the plaintiffs in the Simpson wrongful death trial, Daniel Petrocelli, said he used Bugliosi’s book on the OJ criminal trial as the playbook for proving Simpson’s guilt in the civil trial.
our leaders!This brothel scene from "The Godather 2" is a realistic glimpse into what really happens in the innermost sanctums of power. Just substitute in the Jewish mafioso (like Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner, Rothschilds) for Italian mafioso. Scenes like this were likely occurring on Epstein's island. That's why he purchased that remote&isolated property.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULcJhIoLte4&t=15sEpstein was a real-life Michael Corleone.Replies: @J.Ross, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thomas, @Peter D. Bredon, @smetana, @Shel100
“All that’s left is our friendship.”
When a Soros DA won't prosecute, can there be a Special Prosecutor petition? If so, who can petition and who has to approve?Replies: @Hibernian
That’d be a lot of petitions, and I doubt many would be granted. A retired judge likely has political connections, and you’re not always going to get someone with that type of connections to forward a petition.
Blacks already prepared for this:
https://imagez.tmz.com/image/3b/o/2015/01/23/3b7b5256c43c5faab21736b400162512_md.jpgReplies: @John Johnson
Black fantasy.
Germanic people actually make lousy slaves. The Romans learned this the hard way.
They pretend to go along with it and just when you think your German is nice and civil he shoves a sword through your neck.
American Indians also made lousy slaves. They would do anything to escape and then survive in the woods with nothing. The Southerners would pay them however as ranch hands and as guides to track down escaped Africans. It’s actually a myth that anyone can be enslaved. There are written accounts of how American Indians are near impossible to use as indentured servants since they become depressed and try to escape at any opportunity.
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction. That does seem unfair. It's sort of a mirror image of "right to remain silent" -- you shouldn't be doubly punished merely for testifying on your own behalf.Replies: @Jim, @Jack D, @Right_On
If just having a jury disbelieve your claim of innocence was automatically deemed to be perjury, then every conviction would automatically tack on a perjury conviction.
When you enter a plea of not guilty at the start of a trial you are not under oath, so can’t later be charged with perjury.
Also, for a defendant to be found guilty, The Prosecution has to prove its case “beyond reasonable doubt”. You could later say that your not-guilty plea simply meant you didn’t think the case against you was strong enough to result in a conviction!
True. It’s also the case that races that are hard to enslave aren’t necessarily the ones who won’t work for low wages. And those easiest to enslave are often those with the worst employment record when they’re part of the free labour force.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/hispanic-voters-now-evenly-split-between-parties-wsj-poll-finds-11638972769Replies: @Moses
Lol funny stuff Jack.
From: https://www.statista.com/statistics/631236/voter-turnout-of-the-exit-polls-of-the-2016-elections-by-race/
Having misspent my youth toiling at the criminal bar, judges take a very dim view of defendants who lie through their teeth. Suspect it's the problem with an actor being a defendant; thought simply playing a role well would carry the day. Also appears his attorneys did not grasp the pitfalls of letting a total narcissist testify. Explaining driving around Chicago smoking dope and visiting gay bathhouses with one of your paid assailants did not in any way dispprove the hate hoax conspiracy. Height of it was Smollett getting angry with the DA for reading his own texts verbatim with the "n" owrd out loud. As if somehow the prosecutor quoting his own vulgarity ws the worst crime imaginable.
Juicy Smo-le-ay is about to spend some time behind bars.Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Curle
I’ve walked into an courthouse bathroom before only to hear one very angry non-lawyer black guy rage to another, more composed non-lawyer black guy, about the stupidity of a judge who, apparently, didn’t grasp the brilliance of the man’s defense (insert imagination here). I gather from things I’ve read and heard from lawyer’s that such delusions of brilliance are common among defendants (Dunning-Kruger).
“ So cops, unlike candidates and commentators, don’t turn off their brains as soon as somebody invokes identity talismans such as race and sexual orientation.”
They’ll learn.
Although hack judge Sullivan wanted to find General Flynn guilty of perjury, for falsely pleading that he was guilty of lying to the FBI.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/01/judge-in-michael-flynn-case-defends-decision-not-to-immediately-drop-criminal-case.html
Yes. Everyone knows when a foreign company buys an American company, as Unilever bought Ben & Jerry’s, the American company instantly becomes foreign. Employees get new passports and everything.
Btw – Unilever is Dutch and British, not just Dutch.
You’re welcome.
California’s gun laws tend to cause California gun owners to opt for “fewer bullets, bigger holes” choices. The Glock 23 is still probably one of the most popular handguns in the state, despite .40 S&W having fallen out of fashion in most of the rest of the country. If you’re stuck with no more than 10 rounds, no reason to go with 9mm over .40.
There’s a long history of Hasidic smuggling that takes advantage of their sartorial peculiarities. The first large shipments of ecstasy in the US were brought in from Europe to New York by a Hasidic smuggling ring. Hasidim in Antwerp move diamonds wrapped up in their prayer shawls.
https://movies2watch.tv/watch-movie/watch-holy-rollers-hd-858.5311705
But Jewish immigration was (mostly) over 100 years ago, so again it has nothing to do with modern day immigration.Replies: @Mr. Anon
Given their considerable, and often even strident, support for modern immigration, I’d say it has something to do with it.
Everyone is aware that an actor is a professional liar, right?
Anyone else notice that Smollett was described as “Jewish, Black and Gay” in the press initially before he began being investigated for staging the incident himself, at which point the press began describing him as “Black and Gay” only?
True story
And what does that tell you?
Image is everything
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/black-jewish-actor-jussie-smollett-violently-assaulted-579151
and The Times of Israel still claims him (though not in the headline).
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jussie-smollett-convicted-of-staging-racist-attack-against-himself-lying-to-police/
https://nypost.com/2013/06/28/trayvon-martins-girlfriend-admits-she-cant-read-the-letter-she-supposedly-wrote-to-his-mother-about-his-death/
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/04/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-100-million-fraud-diamond-rachel/A fraud that the DA was openly complicit in, both he and the ho should be in jail.Back in the before times of 1990 the Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter lying before Congress, pretending to be a nurses aid in Kuwait City watching Iraqi soldiers throw newborns on the floor so they could steal the incubators was worthy of prosecution but wasn't because
1. Diplomatic immunity.
2. Everyone in DC wanted the war and the perjury before Congress was for the Stupid American Public, so who cares?https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Nayirah_al-%E1%B9%A2aba%E1%B8%A5
Hill and Knowlton, BTW, the New York PR firm who arranged the perjury, is now helping the WHO craft its Covid message to, you've guessed it, the Stupid American Public.https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-world-health-organization-hired-a-top-pr-firm-to-fight-covid-smears-in-the-usC'est la vie.Replies: @Yngvar
The link you provided says she didn’t. Explain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
Tattooed gold chain bling, the next big thing.
It's Chicago, Jake.
But I have to note, Negros really seem to like their nooses and their bananas. Sure signs of a hoax.Replies: @Hibernian
It was felony disorderly conduct.
The problem is, there isn’t ENOUGH racism for the Left. So they invent it. The Left hierarchy jumped up to support the great job Juicy did to advance the hysteria. That it was so fake as to be a joke matters not to the Left – their message got out. The Left is FOR racism; it is their most successful tool.
Years ago, a fire captain told me that 85% of arsons involved the property owners. When evidence of arson is discovered, the property owners instantly become the primary suspects.
I don’t have any official confirmation of this, but I’m confident that when a “hate crime” like swastikas being painted on a rural black church happens, the cops INSTANTLY suspect the church people. Blacks! would consider it racist, though the cops would suspect the same of anyone.
“The wicked flee when no one pursueth.” And Blacks! ascribe racism to everything.
She lied, but she was not under oath when she testified:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
A hate crime hoax is every bit a hate crime itself.
This highly-privileged Black homosexual is exposed as an anti-White racist & an anti-heterosexual bigot.
Real Black-on-White crime often results from the media hyping phony White-on-Black crime. It would be surprising if this bigot’s hoax did not provoke such crimes.
This hateful liar should:
— be punished at least as severely as the alleged White heterosexuals would be if they were real.
— have to fully reimburse the huge financial expenses he imposed on law enforcement & the legal system.
— have to publicly apologize to everyone he deceived.
And the media & sleazy politicians & Hollywood celebrities should spend just as much time & effort exposing this hoax as they did promoting it. Of course none of that will happen, and the sleazy creep will get off with little more than the wrist slap the “experts” predict.
That is how “White privilege” works in the real world.
I suggest you read the link again.
Sober this time.
https://movies2watch.tv/watch-movie/watch-holy-rollers-hd-858.5311705
It is very important Smollett spends at least some time in prison. One is that he deserves it and the other is that this will be on his permanent record making it near impossible for him to do to anyone else ever again.
False accusations are much more common then people realize particularly in the family court system. It is very easy to do and even when someone gets caught, they are rarely punished. That should tell you how flagrant this was. He might end up being the only person convicted of this crime in the last decade.
Lastly, it will be easy to hold up Jussie Smollett and waive him like a bloody shirt next time a talking head denies this exists. He will become a caricature not that he isn’t already.
Anyone else notice that Smollett was described as "Jewish, Black and Gay" in the press initially before he began being investigated for staging the incident himself, at which point the press began describing him as "Black and Gay" only?
True story
And what does that tell you?
Image is everythingReplies: @res
That’s an interesting point. And for anyone who is inclined to play “No True Jew,” note that the Jerusalem Post claimed him then
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/black-jewish-actor-jussie-smollett-violently-assaulted-579151
and The Times of Israel still claims him (though not in the headline).
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jussie-smollett-convicted-of-staging-racist-attack-against-himself-lying-to-police/
I agree 100% Prof. Woland! Smollett is a scumbag who decided to create this hoax and then doubled-down on his scheme by deciding to testify under oath before the jury, which they completely rejected. Even the apparent lone black juror rejected his silly and absurd testimony. Such brazen contempt of the legal system merits some jail time. I predict one year, which really means he will only serve six months. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2021/12/14/black-juror-smolletts-reaction-to-noose-makes-no-sense/8892508002/