RSS
America’s leading wit, Commentary editor John Podhoretz, explains that you can just tell who is an anti-Semite by looking at his filthy face:
JPod is upset by Gareth Porter’s article in The American Conservative:
Trump Trashes Iran Deal to Satisfy Netanyahu
U.S-Iran policy is closer to Israel than it has been in years.
By GARETH PORTER • October 20, 2017
Porter’s reference to the JCPOA means the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or the Iran Deal. Presumably, JPod has strong opinions on the subject.
But JPod is also triggered by Gareth Porter’s obviously anti-Semitic physiognomy. The physical existence of people who look like Gareth Porter is a macroaggression against JPod.
Here’s JPod’s response to Porter.
Poor Gareth Porter only qualifies as “repellent” on the JPod Scale, unlike some big timers who have made it all the way to “reprllent.”
Oy vey. Someone is not gonna have a good time at the holiday table.
Steve, you have to admit ” Gareth Porter” is not far removed from “Haven Monahan”.
Gawd, that craggy Irish face --- pitty-pat pitty-pat.
And he loves his mother!
My negro problem transmogrified.
I’m not an expert in anti-Semitic physiognomy, but I don’t think Mr. Porter’s face is what I would have pictured as “stereotypical”.
Hey, he spelled “repellent” right.
Love the capitalization of offal. Increases the potency!
Also the imagery of a “devouring coal” that eats your soul (like a hungry cancer?) is weirdly amusing. Too bad it doesn’t make any sense. Or is it an environmental reference? Is Porter from WV or otherwise involved with the coal industry.
It would seem that JPod never learned the lesson of Proverbs 25:21 about showing kindness to enemies. Instead, his preferred tact is to go straight to divine wrath.
Maybe, Harvey Weinstein will redeem himself by producing a movie about JPod’s struggle against filthy anti-Semites.
A documentary about his fall would be worth a fortune.Replies: @Anonymous
Isn’t that Bill Nye the Global Warming Guy?
http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/atlas_obscura/2014/10/28/the_history_of_candy_corn/284903890_7af5f25c32_b.jpg.CROP.promo-large2.jpgReplies: @Neil Templeton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_RussellThis is a task for Google and its deep-learning computer boffins. Build an Android application to scan faces in the street, and if it signals a filthy anti-semite, punch a filthy anti-semite!
Offal isn’t a proper noun.
Given Porter’s hard work on ‘minimizing’ Pol Pot’s massacres you can perhaps understand JPod’s hostility. And if you can’t, well, that’s the way it is.
And his friend is here: https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/09/18/pol-pot-revisited/
Funny how no one who despises white highland Southerners gets called an anti-Scots Irish something.
Go easy on the man. He can’t help it.
“Jew eat?”
I wonder if I could build an AI that could detect anti-Semites better than humans could? Would that get me a job at Stanford? (That would be nice, but I’m worried it might inadvertently reveal some … uh… “hatefacts”….)
Jeez, seeing old men in pictures of suits arguing like this on twitter is absurd..
Even though he has many personal issues/grudges with them (in itself an involved tale spanning decades), Paul Gottfried reluctantly and grudgingly respects the old guard neoconservative Zionists. I don’t think he has much respect for any of their spawns, a prime example being Junior Podhoretz.
My own personal observation of Pod Junior: non compos mentis. If he wasn’t such a vile creature he would deserve pity.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
Their faces are slightly undulating..which would be a really freaky concern about “concern” about GCC warming. Whatever…I have to sleep and step into my pod for that 🙂
offal is awful…even with all that I WILL EAT it, sometimes.
I was thinking that too and then I realized I can’t picture a stereotypical anti-Semite anyway. Julius Streicher springs to mind but then he looks nothing like Louis-Ferdinand Céline or Ezra Pound.
You know, the 98.8%!
go ahead…please tell your idea. We are all waiting, offal or not.
And his friend is here: https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/09/18/pol-pot-revisited/Replies: @Cagey Beast, @tomv
Yeah, jPod is all worked up on behalf of Pol Pot’s victims.
So if you look like a extra from the Revenge of the Mummy you’re a Jew hater.
At least JPOD didn’t catch him eating a bagel. He’d no doubt accuse the poor man of eating Jews.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
That is indeed a remarkable physiognomic resemblance. It follows that Nye is a filthy anti-Semite, too. Sad!
Projection, projection, projection. Podhoretz’s world is a veritable Cinerama theater.
So, he hates people who look like members of other tribes. Big surprise.
He is practically begging us to say what he looks like.
And so it goes, ’round and ’round, a self-fulfilling prophesy whose initial causes were paranoia and self-exclusion.
Harvey and the Weinstein Company should have agreed to have a film crew shadow him as soon as he was fired, with an understanding no footage would be released unless they both agreed to terms later.
A documentary about his fall would be worth a fortune.
Might Porter be Talosian?
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=star+trek+talosian&id=DB311E0D8E0BD5C5DE64B73747011F798167DA01&FORM=IQFRBA
A documentary about his fall would be worth a fortune.Replies: @Anonymous
I’d watch that. Damn if this wouldn’t bring Harvey right back to the Oscars! He could offer some repentance and some **** *** (I think Steve strives to maintain a high tone here, and does not allow vulgar expressions….)
It is, in the original German.
Also the imagery of a "devouring coal" that eats your soul (like a hungry cancer?) is weirdly amusing. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. Or is it an environmental reference? Is Porter from WV or otherwise involved with the coal industry.Replies: @Lex, @Neil Templeton, @Bill, @FPD72
I think it may be a reference to The Monolith Monsters movie.
...but this old b&w sf fan salutes you.
The incredible shrinking (white) man--Grant Williams.
You know who else Gareth Porter sort of resembles…
John Podhoretz should confine his tweets and writings to Jewish only issues that involve his fellow tribesmen. For example, he can comment on Harvey Weinstein, Anthony Weiner and Bernie Madoff. Otherwise, he’s committing the deadly Jewish sin of appropriating goyem cultures for which he knows absolutely nothing about since he lives exclusively in his Jewish-only bubble. The reprllent John Podhoretz’ motto is , “Diversity for goyem thee, but not for me.”
You almost wonder if he’s going to start pulling out calipers to measure the skulls and decide what cephalic index is Good For The Jews™.
Extremes meet.
It’s going to get confusing if the Jpods of the world start using the “PhysiognomyIsReal” hashtag.
It’s actually not clear where each of you fall on the Jpod Outrage Scale. You should see if he’s willing to provide a handy chart to answer questions like “Does ‘reprllent’ outweigh capital-O ‘Offal’?” Your racism makes you loathsome filth, but Porter’s is the very coal lodged in his heart.
I would be legitimately interested to know what, if any, criticisms of Israel Jpod considers to be within the bounds of acceptable discourse. Are Jews such as Chomsky who disagree with Israeli government policies loathsome, reprllent filth?
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/199777/danger-normaliut-peter-robinson
“That is the great fear.”
Right- Gareth Porter looks like an old Scottish fisherman.
“Just look at him” might not be J Pod’s best approach
JPod isn’t properly literate.
Is this a heretofore unnoticed Jewish trait?Replies: @Anon, @Forbes, @Zumbuddi
Well, Porter looks WASP. And like someone who could be distantly friendly to you, but at the same time distantly judging that your behaviour and claims are transgressive. So he is really dangerous for Jews, more dangerous than a fierce antisemite (because of his coolness and judgment – distance implies superiority, which Jews can’t stand).
And for a Jewish neoconservative which once was at the heart of power, it must be intolerable that distant, superior-looking WASPs still exist and have their say.Wherefore did all their Jewish parents sacrifice so much of their lives? No wonder, Podhoretz Jr. gets unhinged.
I love how Podhoretz capitalised Offal, that’s seriously gutsy!
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
Other than with a dinner jacket – bow ties correlate strongly with a penchant for buggery.
So, he hates people who look like members of other tribes. Big surprise.
He is practically begging us to say what he looks like.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/835286877905293312/Jcg7ekGf_400x400.jpg
And so it goes, 'round and 'round, a self-fulfilling prophesy whose initial causes were paranoia and self-exclusion.Replies: @silviosilver, @lavoisier
Love one of the (many funny) tweets on that thread: “The Committee to Buy a Mirror For John Podhoretz. Give till it hurts.”
Goodwhites in meltdown over Joyce Carol Oates tweet.
Anti-semitic faces. Well, except for one.
https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3cd3902a15d02b68538bced988da2f53-c
https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-7f7918fb795cc0926d874be6a81ecf37-c
Questions:
Where do I meet one of these “composite” women?
Is there a similar sequence of images available taken from different angles (say, the backside, just as an example)?
.
.
.
The
Pollack babePolish young lady should use a different conditioner. Do they not have Target in the East Bloc?Replies: @Anonymoushttps://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
Thanks, Buzz Mohawk, for noting the resemblance between Gareth Porter and Bill Nye, the Science Guy. And thanks to this website for being a good resource for physiognomy lore. The lesson I draw from this is that you can recognize an Anti-Semite from the candy-corn shape of his head (how Halloween-appropriate!):
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
Earlobology.
Boy, some Jews don’t have much tolerance for push back. They get a little static from some goy guy and fly off the handle spewing invective and trash talk. Their veneer of civilized behavior wears off pretty easily, just a rub will do it.
Which is what I’ve said all along. Their cultural values–especially regarding freedom of thought and expression–are not compatible with those of a democracy of equal voices. They are fundamentally a paternalistic, Theocratic people.
What an effort it must take for them to keep up the facade, but they are borne up by the hope or prospect that it won’t be long until they win out and can let the mask drop once and for all. Then a guy like JPod lets the mask slip and we get a glimpse of the beast locked in the closet (the one with whom the Palestinians are already intimately familiar).
Counter-Semitism.
Podhoretz left out the word “virulent.” I thought it was sorta like a grammatical law that “virulent” has to go before “anti-semite.” And if the guy looks like a “straight out of central casting” anti-semite, well, whose fault is that? It’s not Italians or Poles who determine who gets what parts in movies. And then he calls Steve “racist?” Let’s talk about racism, eh?
Anyway, something for Podhoretz to read that’ll re-inform him as to why we invaded Iraq — the same reasons why we’ll undoubtedly go mess with Iran and create another new tidal wave of immigrants who’ll pour into Europe and not Israel: Chapter 8 of Mearsheimer & Walt’s book.
Well, except for Israel, unless she’s an Arab.
JPod is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
The term “anti-Jew” is clearer, more accurate than “anti-semitic.”
“Semitic” includes many peoples of the levant, not just Jews.
“Anti-semitic” never made sense to me. It’s almost as if “anti-semitic” is an attempt to create a stop word slur that sounds vaguely pathological without triggering thoughts related to the “Jew” brand. Almost.
Is it my imagination or is Porter’s nose not only sizable but slightly hooked at the end? Perhaps Podhoretz doth protest so much due to nose envy! May I extend to John my compassionate invitation to be psychoanalyzed by me via Skype for a mere $250/hour.
I know part of the indisputable proofs of the existence of the patriarchy is that ONLY women can be referred to as “shrill”.
This leads me to conclude that perhaps JPOD now identifies as a woman, and attacks on zher are not only Anti-Semitic but manifestations of a deep misogynistic hatred that dwarfs anything Harvey Weinstein (or any other tribal member committed to universal values) might have done.
I found JPod to be interesting sometimes about 20 years ago. Now he seems to hear the hoof beats of Cossacks everywhere.
Gareth’s whole tone in his article seems to be that it’s better to let Iran go nuclear than cozy up to Israel. In this case, Gareth sounds like a deranged nut. Letting a bunch of religious crazies get hold of nuclear weapons, especially when those crazies are fundamentally hostile to the US, our culture, and our Christian religion and would be happy to destroy us, is insane.
What would our Middle Ages have been like if one side of the Catholic/Protestant religious wars had nuclear weapons? We would have had one big fat dead Europe, that’s what.
Muslims who think everything would become fine if the US completely converted to Islam are kidding themselves. Islamic countries still get into wars with each other all the time. Iran would still be sulking and angry at the US if we were Muslim, because we’d be a great power with a lot of influence in the Middle East and they wouldn’t be. We’d still be fighting over oil, oil pipelines, power, influence, etc.
Anyway, why the heck should we arm an enemy country just because Gareth thinks the pain of cozying up to a country that’s already a friend of ours is so horrible? Gareth is just plain dumb.
Sounds like a “Fellow White Person” looking out for “our” interests.
I don’t mean to be pedantic, but doesn’t Porter have the sort of bone structure that gets stereotyped as Jewish?
Also the imagery of a "devouring coal" that eats your soul (like a hungry cancer?) is weirdly amusing. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. Or is it an environmental reference? Is Porter from WV or otherwise involved with the coal industry.Replies: @Lex, @Neil Templeton, @Bill, @FPD72
Maybe a dark reference to 19th Century Britain and the always evil Anglo capitalists, crushing virtuous souls in fealty to Mammon.
The irony of a member of a certain tribe famed for its unpleasant physical characteristics and vile behavior calling someone else out based on appearance is not lost on me. The complete inability to engage in introspection is why they are constantly getting kicked out of places.
http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/atlas_obscura/2014/10/28/the_history_of_candy_corn/284903890_7af5f25c32_b.jpg.CROP.promo-large2.jpgReplies: @Neil Templeton
Thorsten Veblen argued that the pecuniary obsession and conspicuous consumption of dolichocephalic (long-headed) blondes was an unpleasant primary feature of Western economies.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
Looks like Bertrand Russel to me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell
This is a task for Google and its deep-learning computer boffins. Build an Android application to scan faces in the street, and if it signals a filthy anti-semite, punch a filthy anti-semite!
Maybe there are calipers and eye-color charts left over from the Nazis.
Extremes meet.
Lots of anti semantism on display here
No wonder Jews prefer muslims to christians
Gareth Porter looks like Kevin MacDonald. So he looks like an intellectual anti Semite.
You can always tell an ‘anti-semite’ by their classically Aryan features.
He looks like the son of someone who stormed the beaches of Normandy and helped liberate Auschwitz.
But your main point is more than valid; it is one of the things that best defines people like Podhoretz: their Asperger-like childish self-absorption means they always toss tantrums and turn on the very people who saved them previously. They are vicious ingrates who, however slowly, bring destruction crashing down on their very heads, as they blame everyone else for not saving them.Replies: @schmenz
Podhoretz seems to be channeling Julius Streicher .
Those photos make me want to quit my job and devote the next decade to international rakishness, before I age out of my good looks.
Neocons are even more vile than Out and Proud Leftists whose raison d’etre is to hate Christ and al the more conservative white Christians.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/644218572030541824/V5hd33DU_400x400.jpg
http://media.salon.com/2015/11/bill_nye-620x412.jpgReplies: @Lagertha, @SEATAF, @NickG, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @ThreeCranes, @El Dato, @J1234
And I just looked up Bill Nye on wiki, and it says he won a Steve Martin look alike contest (?) so the circle of antisemitic phenotype expands.
Damned shape-shifting anti-Semites!
You know, the 98.8%!
Tomas de Torquemada? Brother Nathanael?
Also the imagery of a "devouring coal" that eats your soul (like a hungry cancer?) is weirdly amusing. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. Or is it an environmental reference? Is Porter from WV or otherwise involved with the coal industry.Replies: @Lex, @Neil Templeton, @Bill, @FPD72
Few people can understand someone as brilliant and erudite as JPod. It’s a cross he has to bear. Uh, or something.
You went farther for that than most people will be able to follow…
…but this old b&w sf fan salutes you.
The incredible shrinking (white) man–Grant Williams.
Possibly. He is a white Gentile born in Middle America, but so were Barack Obama’s whore of a mother and her Liberal parents. Gareth Porter has a long history of Leftist stands in terms of ‘peace,’ which in a white Gentile often signals WASP (or Continental Germanic) Elite. And if so, his ancestors may well have spent WW2 sending the children of poorer, and less deserving, whites to die so that the sons of the rich could live and get richer at the expense of the non-wealthy whites and to the benefit of Liberal Jews.
But your main point is more than valid; it is one of the things that best defines people like Podhoretz: their Asperger-like childish self-absorption means they always toss tantrums and turn on the very people who saved them previously. They are vicious ingrates who, however slowly, bring destruction crashing down on their very heads, as they blame everyone else for not saving them.
This has been true it seems all through their history. Odd.
Still better Sunday gladiatorial combat than the NFL.
And speaking of him vilifying offal, what’s he got against chopped liver and kishke?
Neither is David Brooks – one always gets the impression that he is straining for effect, and that he can only do it by constantly referring to his Roget.
Is this a heretofore unnoticed Jewish trait?
Maybe they get a commission?
I’ll briefly recount a portion of my Twitter interaction with John Podhoretz.
I ask John Podhoretz: Do you think mass immigration since the 1965 immigration act has been good for the USA?
John Podhoretz responds: if it dilutes your personal vote to the point where it doesn’t matter, given that your IQ is 12, yes
Tweet from 2014:
JPod is all worked up over the treatment of intellectuals under Pol Pot. Being an intellectual himself and all. Aaaahh…hahahahahahahahaha…
I hope one day I’ll see JPod at Bed Bath and Beyond.
https://twitter.com/PureCuckoldry/status/922033334984642560
Anti-semitic is noticing when enthusiastic members of the self-referenced “The Tribe” cirticize the tribalism of others.
I submit that referring to them as “Tribal member” Kristol, Podhertz, etc. whenever they comment on identity politics.
Yellow star or not, they are obviously intent on pushing the world into WWIII complete with their persecution. The Jewish press is intent on making Hitler’s view of them seem reasonable. With the historical context in view, their behavior is absolutely absurd.
I’d marry any one of them in rows 1 – 7, minus Brazil and Cambodia(?), plus row 9, and Burma in row 8 (long as she promises never to say “Myanmar”).
Questions:
Where do I meet one of these “composite” women?
Is there a similar sequence of images available taken from different angles (say, the backside, just as an example)?
.
.
.
The
Pollack babePolish young lady should use a different conditioner. Do they not have Target in the East Bloc?Is this a heretofore unnoticed Jewish trait?Replies: @Anon, @Forbes, @Zumbuddi
No– Jews are not as good writers as Englishmen, but they can at least master grammar. It is our modern age which neglects such luxuries as having writers who are actually able to write.
JPod is soooo emotional, like a girl. Maybe he shouldn’t have the vote.
"Jew eat?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaPBhxXhprgReplies: @e
One of my fav. scenes. You have to applaud Woody for recognizing Jewish paranoia in himself.
And his friend is here: https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/09/18/pol-pot-revisited/Replies: @Cagey Beast, @tomv
Why then didn’t he call Porter “filthy communist” (just look at his face!) instead of “filthy anti-semite”?
And of course, you’re leaping to JPod’s defense because, like him, you care so, so much about Pol Pot’s innocent victims. That’s just the kind of Cambodia Firster you are!
Also the imagery of a "devouring coal" that eats your soul (like a hungry cancer?) is weirdly amusing. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. Or is it an environmental reference? Is Porter from WV or otherwise involved with the coal industry.Replies: @Lex, @Neil Templeton, @Bill, @FPD72
The burning coal reference comes from Proverbs 25:21-22, in which the reader is encouraged to show kindness toward his enemies, thereby actually increasing the severity of God’s judgment upon them. This proverb is cited by Paul in Romans 12:20 in his argument that Christians are not to take personal vengeance upon those who do them harm but allow God to deal with our enemies.
It would seem that JPod never learned the lesson of Proverbs 25:21 about showing kindness to enemies. Instead, his preferred tact is to go straight to divine wrath.
Questions:
Where do I meet one of these “composite” women?
Is there a similar sequence of images available taken from different angles (say, the backside, just as an example)?
.
.
.
The
Pollack babePolish young lady should use a different conditioner. Do they not have Target in the East Bloc?Replies: @AnonymousThey’re all beautiful (except India and Africa) but I’m in love with the ones in lines 3 (Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand) and especially 5 (China, Korea, Japan, and Mongolia).
What would our Middle Ages have been like if one side of the Catholic/Protestant religious wars had nuclear weapons? We would have had one big fat dead Europe, that's what.
Muslims who think everything would become fine if the US completely converted to Islam are kidding themselves. Islamic countries still get into wars with each other all the time. Iran would still be sulking and angry at the US if we were Muslim, because we'd be a great power with a lot of influence in the Middle East and they wouldn't be. We'd still be fighting over oil, oil pipelines, power, influence, etc.
Anyway, why the heck should we arm an enemy country just because Gareth thinks the pain of cozying up to a country that's already a friend of ours is so horrible? Gareth is just plain dumb.Replies: @cthulhu, @Moses
I confess that I’m having a hard time getting worked up over Iran having atomic weapons. I don’t see them as particularly crazy – they know that if they ever even try to use one against us or Israel, that they’ll wake up as radioactive glass. Same thing goes for them shipping a nuke off to Hamas. For Iran, it’s mostly about getting Saudi Arabia to back down. Iranian rants about Israel and/or the US are for internal consumption, not real policy.
@hunsdon – nice, anyone else get the movie that quote is from?
What would our Middle Ages have been like if one side of the Catholic/Protestant religious wars had nuclear weapons? We would have had one big fat dead Europe, that's what.
Muslims who think everything would become fine if the US completely converted to Islam are kidding themselves. Islamic countries still get into wars with each other all the time. Iran would still be sulking and angry at the US if we were Muslim, because we'd be a great power with a lot of influence in the Middle East and they wouldn't be. We'd still be fighting over oil, oil pipelines, power, influence, etc.
Anyway, why the heck should we arm an enemy country just because Gareth thinks the pain of cozying up to a country that's already a friend of ours is so horrible? Gareth is just plain dumb.Replies: @cthulhu, @Moses
Too many instances of “our” and “we” in this comment. And “our Christian religion”?
Sounds like a “Fellow White Person” looking out for “our” interests.
Very good, sir! Thanks for the chuckle.
Is this a heretofore unnoticed Jewish trait?Replies: @Anon, @Forbes, @Zumbuddi
Brooks and JPod both attended U of Chicago, IIRC. Maybe it’s in the water…
But your main point is more than valid; it is one of the things that best defines people like Podhoretz: their Asperger-like childish self-absorption means they always toss tantrums and turn on the very people who saved them previously. They are vicious ingrates who, however slowly, bring destruction crashing down on their very heads, as they blame everyone else for not saving them.Replies: @schmenz
Good points. It’s one thing I will never understand about these people, that they will “turn on the very people who saved them previously”, as you say.
This has been true it seems all through their history. Odd.
Rather than a Wal-Mart greeter?
Are you kidding? I fell in love w/ Gareth the moment I met him.
Gawd, that craggy Irish face — pitty-pat pitty-pat.
And he loves his mother!
Is this a heretofore unnoticed Jewish trait?Replies: @Anon, @Forbes, @Zumbuddi
Phil Weiss does the Thesaurus thing constantly.
Maybe they get a commission?
Further proof that Israelis engage in wishful thinking.
“Semitic” includes many peoples of the levant, not just Jews.
“Anti-semitic” never made sense to me. It’s almost as if “anti-semitic” is an attempt to create a stop word slur that sounds vaguely pathological without triggering thoughts related to the “Jew” brand. Almost.Replies: @Zumbuddi
Say, Moses, are Egyptians Semitic? Or Negroid?
“Filthy” “antisemites” “straight-out-of-central-casting” look like they do because Jew casting directors pick them, presumably because their looks stick in Jewish craws somehow. White peoples’ faces that Pod the (Very) Lesser doesn’t like look like the faces that Jewish casting directors didn’t like (in a good way), and were subsequently un-liked by Pod the (Very) Lesser in much the same way (except not good). This tells Pod the (Very) Lesser that there’s no Jewish conspiracy about goys’ unliked faces.
Dang, almost had the 88th comment.
What’s so great about J-Pod is he’s so fucking stupid. And he has the personality of a dog turd. Which is a great combo.
Pod the (Very) Lesser is an overflowing cup filled with the cream of human goodness… or something.
Jews, I’m giving you a pass on Pt(V)L. Full retard is full retard, regardless of race; sometimes you just roll genetic snake eyes.
Lumps of coal can devour souls?
I’ve had enough of all the Pod people.
I’ll save you the trouble of looking up the meaning of “Semite.”
From Merriam-Webster:
“Semitic” can mean “Arab.” So, yes, Egyptians are “Semites.” You’re not an anti-Semite, are you?
What are the choices?
Anti
Pro
Non
Philo
Phone
If I'm not from southwestern Asia THEN what am I --- would that be the non-Semitic prefix?
Years ago choices were Caucasian, Negroid, Oriental.
The question re Egyptians was genuine ; some ancient depictions have dark skin, thick lips , flat noses.Replies: @Moses
Glad you mentioned the NFL. It’s most heartening to see this: LINK.
The Browns/Titans photo is astonishing.
He thinks he should be America’s leading wit, too bad for him looks, brains, and personality still count for something.
Well if you can change jobs do it man but if not do it in spite of your job, life is short and the earths delights (images from above) are many and wondrous but the younger you are the better for rakishness. (Grin)
You’ll never regret it.
It’s repeated once in a while around here.
“You’re not an anti semite, are you?”
What are the choices?
Anti
Pro
Non
Philo
Phone
If I’m not from southwestern Asia THEN what am I — would that be the non-Semitic prefix?
Years ago choices were Caucasian, Negroid, Oriental.
The question re Egyptians was genuine ; some ancient depictions have dark skin, thick lips , flat noses.
No wonder Jews prefer muslims to christiansReplies: @black sea
What exactly do you mean by that?
Would seriously like to hear an objective, testable definition of "anti-Semitism" that doesn't rely on feelings.
What are the choices?
Anti
Pro
Non
Philo
Phone
If I'm not from southwestern Asia THEN what am I --- would that be the non-Semitic prefix?
Years ago choices were Caucasian, Negroid, Oriental.
The question re Egyptians was genuine ; some ancient depictions have dark skin, thick lips , flat noses.Replies: @Moses
Thanks for remaking my original point. “Anti-Semite” is too vague and confusing.
“Anti-Jew” is clearer and more precise.
For example: “You think American foreign policy favors Israel at the expense of American interests? You’re an anti-Jew!”
Second that.
Would seriously like to hear an objective, testable definition of “anti-Semitism” that doesn’t rely on feelings.
Zionism =/= Judaism
I remember years ago, when JPod was the obese, prematurely-balding tv critic for the NY Post – just a kid, really – when I momentarily stopped whistling the Horst Wessel Song long enough to wonder how much longer he’d have to pretend to be working before Pop and Midge would simply give him the magazine to run. Turned out the answer was “not long at all”.
And he’s been a shonda for the goyim ever since!~
I wonder if there’s some subconscious meaning in that saying. Because it can certainly be read that way, and in light of the Jews’ long practice of encouraging their less capable and committed to go find something else to be, that reading makes sense.
What is needed is a wide-spread ans long-lasting program, not of Anti-semitism, but
Counter-Semitism.
Jews, I'm giving you a pass on Pt(V)L. Full retard is full retard, regardless of race; sometimes you just roll genetic snake eyes.Replies: @Dissident
I understand that due to blocking JavaScript (which I also try to avoid as much as I can), your replies do not link back to the posts that they were made to. But could you at least cite the comments that you reply-to by including the name of the author and the number of the comment in the thread? I’m sure that I speak for many in saying that would be much appreciated.
And I wonder what nasal index is “good for Gentiles”.
Gareth Porter, along with Noam Chomsky, is one of the rare defenders of the Khmer Rouge in academe. He is a target as generous as Kate Smith’s rear end. The man’s likely never uttered a non-perverse statement in any formal published piece.
Podhoretz is actually a satisfactory book reviewer. It’s just that you can hardly make a living at that anymore.
He actually worked in topical commentary for 23 years before taking the editor’s chair at Commentary. Norman Podhoretz retired in 1995. It was his deputy Neil Kozodoy who was the editor when JP was appointed. It’s a reasonable wager they were able to give the magazine to JPod because the American Jewish Committee wanted to unload it and the Podhoretz camarilla were the only ones who wanted it. Evidently they can collar enough donor money to keep the Commentary staff employed.
Some of these publications are shoestring operations. I was astonished to discover that Irving Kristol’s The Public Interest generally had only four paid employees. It was shut down in 2003 because (one surmises) with Kristol’s retirement, there really wasn’t anyone who wanted to run it anymore (though Kristol’s deputy Adam Wolfson did so for a couple of years). The Rockford Institute’s ‘Center on Religion and Society’ had only five employees. It’s successor, the “Institute on Religion and Public Life” was entirely housed in an eight-room office suite. As for Commentary, it’s not a healthy operation. If you look at the regular contributors to it’s online site, you discover that their median age is over 55 and they have one contributor under 40. For a good while, their principal producer of verbiage was Jonathan Tobin, who actually made his career in the Jewish press rather than starboard opinion journalism. Mr. Tobin is nearly 70. Not a deep bench there.
So, he hates people who look like members of other tribes. Big surprise.
He is practically begging us to say what he looks like.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/835286877905293312/Jcg7ekGf_400x400.jpg
And so it goes, 'round and 'round, a self-fulfilling prophesy whose initial causes were paranoia and self-exclusion.Replies: @silviosilver, @lavoisier
Despite the misleading smile suggesting good will, he does look a bit reprllent for sure.