I'm Interviewed on the Woman Question
RSS
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
It was nice to find several checks in my PO Box today in the wake of the August fundraising drive. The reader who sent an extremely generous one requested more podcast and video interviews, so here’s a new podcast interview I did:
Every week, it seems, X starts boiling over with yet another version of the Woman Question. Here's my interview with @Steve_Sailer about his Law of Female Journalism & related difficulties in American society.https://t.co/pri6xt8pbt
— Titus Techera (@titusfilm) September 5, 2023
Follow @steve_sailer
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Hopefully, more people will be acquainted with the First Law of Female Journalism. The world WILL be a better place if it is known widely.
It’s laughably unscientific.Replies: @Adolf Smith
The woman problem is definitely a big problem and I’m interested to “hear” Steve’s thoughts … but not actually spend an hour hearing them.
I anyone has link to transcript, please shout out.
Thank God all those checks are coming in to keep White people on the CivCuck project.
We wouldn’t want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we’d be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.
It’s doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.
Steve plays the “really nice guy” schtick, but somehow I don’t think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.
Just curious about your idea of what the proper quota for whites (or the melanographic "Whites" if you prefer) should be at Berkeley, UCLA, UCSD, etc, when you get the existing Prop. 209 law overturned. Neither the old Loyalty or his officemate Silly Citizen would deign to answer such questions.
California lawmakers vote to become first state to ban caste-based discriminationReplies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
I would never accuse Steve of anything. But, in general, think how easy it would be for the multi-billion dollar left-wing disinformation-industrial complex to put a thumb on the scale of the right-wing blogosphere by making anonymous contributions to humble bloggers, along with notes like: "I love your stuff, keep up the good work . . . luckily I can support you because you aren't one of those crazies who advocates for [Insert forbidden position re Trump; Covid; Ukraine; J6; etc.]."Replies: @Mike Tre
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields--ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all--and Steve popped our front and said "Hey fellows, let's think about civic nationalism!" ... then you'd have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense--with the open border, trannies, CRT--that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding--for most--has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB--which is an intellectual body blow to the "evil whitey!" narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on "next steps". I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the "differential totalitarianism"--the "who whom", who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies--their host--submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out "separation". Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents--enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off--what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths--like HBD--that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.Replies: @DCThrowback, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Colin Wright
“…X starts boiling over with yet another version of the Woman Question.”
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:
Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”
What the heck’s wrong with White people?
The problem is the medical leeches who then try to suck as much money as they can off of these people through various procedures. While that may make sense for adults with physical issues, it doesn't for most with gender confusion, who probably just need counseling.
There are shades of grey in between the two genders here, that both Vivek and his Woke, aggressively trans opponents miss. In his case, it's probably because he is a huge conman, just like most politicians, which is why he fits right in with them, and just like that Yale professor criticizing him, based on his Ukraine support.
"I’m with the Indian, "
Well, there's part of the problem.Replies: @fish
The Law of Female Journalism, as amusing as it is, is a serious questioning of what the hell this society is doing letting women dish out narratives about American politics and society, much less RUN THINGS.
Ramaswamy, for reasons, can be more truthful - maybe he's just got more courage - but he won't dare touch this one, would he? What's he had to say about Feminism? (Seriously, I only watched a clip of the immigration question parts of that debate and don't really follow these people, besides Ron DeSantis.)Replies: @Bumpkin
https://www.hrc.org/about
I did my own prognostication as I sat in front of muh TV,( its hard to predict things,especially the future) as I thought,"Seeing all these sports stars and celebs,like Markie Mark,actually going along with the preposterous notion that this Olympic champ and father was a woman is going to be a really bad thing for the 'yutes,' as it will further the acceptance of this horseshit."White people are so stupid. I saw maybe one or two black athletes shaking their heads, at least,but the whites, even tough guy Markie,were all in on this spectacle. Who was the first guy to stop clapping for Jenner,that slob?
The worst nightmare for Greenblatt is if Tucker Carlson becomes President in 2028. What does Jonathan know that we don’t?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/12/08/adls_greenblatt_it_wouldnt_be_crazy_if_tucker_carlson_is_the_gop_nominee_saying_no_globalists_in_my_admin.html
CEO of the Anti-Defamation League Jonathan Greenblatt on Wednesday’s broadcast of ‘The Breakfast Show’ with co-host Charlamagne tha God: “So, six years from now, if someone said to me anti-Semitic incidents will have tripled again, synagogues will be shut down, Jewish day schools will be closed because of threats, Jews will have left in large numbers, Tucker Carlson will be the nominee for the GOP and will say we need to get all the globalists out of — there will be no globalists in my administration. That shouldn’t sound so crazy.”
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
Pedro Gonzalez on Twitter can also get away with noticing mainly due to his name.
Rob Bonta is the most gay looking politician I have ever seen. I wonder if there are DNA tests on the three children that are allegedly his with his rather unattractive black wife. Seriously, anyone who says telling the parents is the equivalent of “outing” a sexually confused kid needs to be slapped really hard.
People who notice will notice that this is a month old.
Why the reticence?
Horribly OT
Public Image bassist Jah Wobble, back in the Times in September 2004:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,174-1233697,00.html
Paper Of Record, today:
Ethnicities of both victim and alleged murderers are what you might expect. Being white, old and living alone in London is not a great idea unless you have fantastic neighbours. Even out here in the sticks there’ll be people who prey on the elderly, but they’re generally less violent.
Unfortunately, in the modern world the people charged with protecting the elderly are hamstrung by the legal requirements of their professions.
Somehow, I doubt that the lady in question was related to a local criminal kingpin. After all, boiling in oil is still available to some.
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
Eh, while I mostly agree with Vivek, we all know a few people who have traits of the other gender, whether caused by hormones or brain chemistry or whatever. Then, there is the very small minority of people who have physical differences too.
The problem is the medical leeches who then try to suck as much money as they can off of these people through various procedures. While that may make sense for adults with physical issues, it doesn’t for most with gender confusion, who probably just need counseling.
There are shades of grey in between the two genders here, that both Vivek and his Woke, aggressively trans opponents miss. In his case, it’s probably because he is a huge conman, just like most politicians, which is why he fits right in with them, and just like that Yale professor criticizing him, based on his Ukraine support.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/12/08/adls_greenblatt_it_wouldnt_be_crazy_if_tucker_carlson_is_the_gop_nominee_saying_no_globalists_in_my_admin.html
CEO of the Anti-Defamation League Jonathan Greenblatt on Wednesday's broadcast of 'The Breakfast Show' with co-host Charlamagne tha God: "So, six years from now, if someone said to me anti-Semitic incidents will have tripled again, synagogues will be shut down, Jewish day schools will be closed because of threats, Jews will have left in large numbers, Tucker Carlson will be the nominee for the GOP and will say we need to get all the globalists out of -- there will be no globalists in my administration. That shouldn't sound so crazy."Replies: @Pixo
Tucker is too busy doing web interviews with delusional homosexuals describing their fantasy trysts with Barack Obama.
The "Obamas" were a major fraud and joke imposed on the gullible world. Many, many people know, but the readers of this site are always surprisingly badly informed. They go on and on about the lies of mainstream media, and then believe it all for fear of being a conspiracy "theorist." oooh--what a title.
I anyone has link to transcript, please shout out.Replies: @Anonymous
Don’t you go out for a run, go to the gym, and/or drive?
Weird that there are so many people at this blog who are so militant against listening or watching interviews. Don’t they have some free time or down time? Up until the 15th century the vast majority people— almost exclusively— got their education through speech/lecture. Reading changed the human brain as much as the internet and social media. And there’s the common assumption it’s all good and that the written word extracted from actual human interaction is ok.
What I REALLY hate is an otherwise really nice job by a pundit on video who's distracting the hell out of me by driving or walking around town while doing it. That's insane. Park the car, go inside and sit the fuck down... in your closet. OK, now go ahead. What was the middle part again?
BTW, the guy in your 1920 book excerpt would surely not recommend listening to a podcast while outside "reading in the book of nature".Replies: @Inquiring Mind
Speaking for myself, I like to be situationally aware. No headphones when running (walking, in my case) or working out.
I generally don't drive for extended periods especially with WFH and prefer music when I do.
I have lots of free time and down time. I also have tinnitus.
I hope someday you'll have the pleasure of forgoing listening to any aural interview and further, that you have to watch interviews in English with the English captions, if any, turned on.
Some podcasts I do enjoy listening in bed without the video.
Though sometimes podcasts are worth watching on the big screen, such as this walk and talk from magnificent Moscow.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UKcsEW-DyBY&si=LGg6NrnE_eups8rU
Actually, no, I don't do any of those things. I hate running and to do it while I'm trying to avoid getting run over by bicyclists who ignore traffic laws is asking for death. I exercise at home and have never been to a gym. And I haven't driven in 15 years.
I read much faster than I listen. Furthermore, I can't avoid picking apart a speaker's hesitations (um, like, etc.), mispronunciations, irritating voice, pointless diversions, and so on.
I have deliberately never listened to Mr. Sailer speak so as to avoid being disappointed in how he talks. As for what he writes, except for baseball, I'll read anything that interests him.
We wouldn't want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we'd be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.
It's doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.
Steve plays the "really nice guy" schtick, but somehow I don't think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.Replies: @jb, @Reg Cæsar, @Hypnotoad666, @AnotherDad
What are you talking about? Steve is one of the most influential pro-white voices in America! You upset because he isn’t calling for repatriation or the return of slavery or something?
Just FYI, I don’t like podcasts and rarely listen to them. There are only so many hours in a day! (If there’s a transcript though I might read it). (And I do understand that sitting down and being interviewed is a lot less time consuming than writing your own stuff, so I can’t really begrudge you that).
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
What’s wrong with you? Transsexuals tend to be (brown) Latin American or Asian.
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
“What the heck’s wrong with White people? ”
“I’m with the Indian, ”
Well, there’s part of the problem.
“I’m with the Indian, ”
Well, there’s part of the problem.
I'm not,"...with the Indian,” either but since we're discussing politicians the white ones have hardly been a treat for whites.
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
I can’t watch the podcast from where I am now. (Agreed with AD about a transcription.) So I could be wrong, but my understanding from the short bit of text is that the BLT-G++ business that Mr. Sailer does write about a lot is not the “woman question” in question here.
The Law of Female Journalism, as amusing as it is, is a serious questioning of what the hell this society is doing letting women dish out narratives about American politics and society, much less RUN THINGS.
Ramaswamy, for reasons, can be more truthful – maybe he’s just got more courage – but he won’t dare touch this one, would he? What’s he had to say about Feminism? (Seriously, I only watched a clip of the immigration question parts of that debate and don’t really follow these people, besides Ron DeSantis.)
Still, like Trump, he probably views it all as a ploy to get votes, then will go back to the establishment in the end, in part because they will literally kill you otherwise, as they did the Kennedy brothers.
The law of female journalism states that the thing the lady really wants to say is that society should be reorganized so she is more attractive.
Now if there were a law of male journalism stating that the thing the dude wants to say is that society should be reorganized to give him more status…yeah, we know about that, it’s a fundamental human power play and we always look at whether the speaker is saying something that benefits them for both sexes.
So what the law of female journalism points out is:
1. The social constructionist dogma running society right now leads people to ignore the obvious truth that beauty is a physical attribute social engineering can only change to a limited extent
2. The old school chivalric presumption against being mean to women combines with the new school feminist presumption of female moral superiority to mean women can say whatever they want
3. The inmates are running the asylum.
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
They’re afraid of the backlash. As in, being sacked, shunned and unemployable after Soros-funded organizations put the pressure on media and businesses/ corporations. Friendly NGO’s like this one:
https://www.hrc.org/about
>The law of female journalism states that the thing the lady really wants to say is that society should be reorganized so she is more attractive.
Let’s just be honest with them. They need to embrace their real nature as journalists. I think dressing like the woman in this video and doing the same thing in their quest to get to the truth of mankind will do this effectively.
It’ll certainly enhance their attractiveness for most men. Even-no especially-for the ugly ones. We’re doing emotional labor or whatever cringe BS they are calling it these days by putting disadvantaged women on equal footing.
Now if there were a law of male journalism stating that the thing the dude wants to say is that society should be reorganized to give him more status…yeah, we know about that, it’s a fundamental human power play and we always look at whether the speaker is saying something that benefits them for both sexes.
So what the law of female journalism points out is:
1. The social constructionist dogma running society right now leads people to ignore the obvious truth that beauty is a physical attribute social engineering can only change to a limited extent
2. The old school chivalric presumption against being mean to women combines with the new school feminist presumption of female moral superiority to mean women can say whatever they want
3. The inmates are running the asylum.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Hypnotoad666
Very good, SFG. (3) is the big problem. It’d be OK to hear all this babbling were it nothing but that.
We wouldn't want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we'd be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.
It's doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.
Steve plays the "really nice guy" schtick, but somehow I don't think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.Replies: @jb, @Reg Cæsar, @Hypnotoad666, @AnotherDad
Did the other “Loyalty” guy ask for a raise, and SPLC/ADL/FBIden replace him with cut-rate you? Were you born south of the Rio Bravo?
Just curious about your idea of what the proper quota for whites (or the melanographic “Whites” if you prefer) should be at Berkeley, UCLA, UCSD, etc, when you get the existing Prop. 209 law overturned. Neither the old Loyalty or his officemate Silly Citizen would deign to answer such questions.
California lawmakers vote to become first state to ban caste-based discrimination
Agree. Note, though, that (3) has been a prob for a long, long time. After all, it’s why we’ve gotten to this point. The only difference is that the Chatty Cathys of America are among the latest of the heretofore “excluded” to have been admitted as patients in the booby hatch.
Is he that Asian Indian guy who was granted access to everyone's tax returns in the U.S. for purpose of figuring out whether forced relocation of poor persons to high median-income zip codes could get them out of poverty?Replies: @epebble
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
Excellent question. Sages and coaches teach “fix yourself first”.
Examine this map. Marriage is the source of civilization itself. What’s eating through the white world is essentially kicking the underlying props out. It’s similar to blacks and their bastardy, a form of rejecting civilization.
Marriage Equality Around the World– Produced by the HRC Foundation
Note the non-white exceptions. From the map’s site: “2 countries, South Africa and Taiwan, enacted legislation legalizing same-sex marriage after courts mandated them to do so.” New Caledonia, like Guiana, is part of France, still run by whites.
The Law of Female Journalism, as amusing as it is, is a serious questioning of what the hell this society is doing letting women dish out narratives about American politics and society, much less RUN THINGS.
Ramaswamy, for reasons, can be more truthful - maybe he's just got more courage - but he won't dare touch this one, would he? What's he had to say about Feminism? (Seriously, I only watched a clip of the immigration question parts of that debate and don't really follow these people, besides Ron DeSantis.)Replies: @Bumpkin
He recently came out unbidden against having women in combat roles in the military, unless they can pass the same fitness standards, which obviously most cannot. This was in answer to a question about race, so I will hand it to the guy, he will touch such issues.
Still, like Trump, he probably views it all as a ploy to get votes, then will go back to the establishment in the end, in part because they will literally kill you otherwise, as they did the Kennedy brothers.
Strongly disagree. I think listening to speeded-up talk is just weird. Listening at normal speed takes 5 – 10 x as long as reading. Finally, if you’re listening and paying good attention while working out, your heart rate is not high enough.
What I REALLY hate is an otherwise really nice job by a pundit on video who’s distracting the hell out of me by driving or walking around town while doing it. That’s insane. Park the car, go inside and sit the fuck down… in your closet. OK, now go ahead. What was the middle part again?
BTW, the guy in your 1920 book excerpt would surely not recommend listening to a podcast while outside “reading in the book of nature”.
Just curious about your idea of what the proper quota for whites (or the melanographic "Whites" if you prefer) should be at Berkeley, UCLA, UCSD, etc, when you get the existing Prop. 209 law overturned. Neither the old Loyalty or his officemate Silly Citizen would deign to answer such questions.
California lawmakers vote to become first state to ban caste-based discriminationReplies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
The quota for whites should be as high as we can negotiate for. That’s how things work on a multiracial society. Every group fights for as much of the pie as possible.
Visualize a three circle Venn diagram:
1. Women (just stipulate XX and move on)
2. Journalists (loosely defined these days, given social media. For this, stick to TV.)
3. Pretty (or Hot, you choose)
Provide your views on the center intersection. Names, criteria, evidence, 1-10…
Bonus points for past, present and upcoming.
366, you missed the entire point of your whole quote. The entire point.
And on another question for women:
Ever wondered if your name might be a clue as to which lines of work you shouldn’t go in for?
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/philly-pd-commissioner-danielle-outlaw-resign-amidst-ongoing-crime-wave
Don’t you go out for a run, go to the gym, and/or drive?
Speaking for myself, I like to be situationally aware. No headphones when running (walking, in my case) or working out.
I generally don’t drive for extended periods especially with WFH and prefer music when I do.
We wouldn't want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we'd be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.
It's doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.
Steve plays the "really nice guy" schtick, but somehow I don't think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.Replies: @jb, @Reg Cæsar, @Hypnotoad666, @AnotherDad
I didn’t realize Steve took requests.
I would never accuse Steve of anything. But, in general, think how easy it would be for the multi-billion dollar left-wing disinformation-industrial complex to put a thumb on the scale of the right-wing blogosphere by making anonymous contributions to humble bloggers, along with notes like: “I love your stuff, keep up the good work . . . luckily I can support you because you aren’t one of those crazies who advocates for [Insert forbidden position re Trump; Covid; Ukraine; J6; etc.].”
“Weird that there are so many people at this blog who are so militant against listening or watching interviews. Don’t they have some free time or down time?”
I have lots of free time and down time. I also have tinnitus.
I hope someday you’ll have the pleasure of forgoing listening to any aural interview and further, that you have to watch interviews in English with the English captions, if any, turned on.
We wouldn't want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we'd be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.
It's doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.
Steve plays the "really nice guy" schtick, but somehow I don't think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.Replies: @jb, @Reg Cæsar, @Hypnotoad666, @AnotherDad
When I here this tiresome rant–from you or the other guy–I always have this little inkling that maybe you’re the Fed or ADL troll.
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields–ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all–and Steve popped our front and said “Hey fellows, let’s think about civic nationalism!” … then you’d have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense–with the open border, trannies, CRT–that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding–for most–has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB–which is an intellectual body blow to the “evil whitey!” narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on “next steps”. I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the “differential totalitarianism”–the “who whom”, who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies–their host–submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out “separation”. Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents–enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off–what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths–like HBD–that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.
As to Fed comment, that's just beneath you. I've never advocated for - nor would I ever advocate for - people to do anything illegal. Indeed, whites can get in a lot of trouble doing legal things like lawfully protesting. We are dissidents now. Act that way.Has it ever dawned on you that I might talk to a normie differently than I would talk to people already familiar with HBD?
But the truth is that Steve and many of his commentators are adamantly opposed to whites joining the identity politics game but then never offer an alternative. Well, that's not true. They offer Citizenism, which has failed horribly for 50 years.
I find that odd, and try to get a few iSteve readers to stop hiding out in colorblind civic nationalism.Steve has done much good for my (our?) side, but he's not on our side. Indeed, unintentionally, Steve is a bit of a gatekeeper. Let whites talk about racial differences, but keep them in the colorblind CivNat reservation.You got that right, but doesn't it ever make you wonder why Steve persists with an utterly failed strategy like Citizenism. It was a reasonably plan 10 or 20 years ago, but not anymore. And, yet, Steve never moves on. Odd.
As to your "next steps," we're generally in agreement in regards to dealing with normies.
However, why can't one of those steps be, "Hey, how come whites aren't allowed to have political groups or business groups. Either we should be allowed to have them just like everyone else or no one should be allowed to have them."
Finally, at the end of the day, other races are not just whites in dark face. They are different, and those difference include how they view the rights and obligations amongst people in a society and feelings of loyalty to their own kin. The morality embodied in the Constitution is simply not shared by the vast majority of non-whites.
Perhaps you hold out hope that you can cherry pick the non-whites that do feel a bond to that morality. Good luck. Those separate communities that you create based on "white" ideals will quickly become much nicer than other communities. At that point, how do you keep people out of those communities. Newcomers will swear their love for small government or free speech or whatever else you ask, not because they believe it but because they want to enjoy what your (mostly white) community has created. Sound familiar.
How do you stop a repeat of what we're experiencing now?
You can't test for what's in a person's heart - or their descendants. But you can test for race.
That was $100,000 back before Biden Bucks. I wonder what the FBI pays now? If one could be somehow be assured of immunity from prosecution, it would be fun to run wild across the internet and see who your new friends are and who is encouraging you to take more concrete action. Take your inner Andrew Anglin for a walk and see who you meet.
You say, “Up until the 15th century the vast majority of people–almost exclusively–got their education through speech/lecture.”
Dude, in those days, “the vast majority of people” couldn’t read, and certainly weren’t pursuing an “education.”
Now if there were a law of male journalism stating that the thing the dude wants to say is that society should be reorganized to give him more status…yeah, we know about that, it’s a fundamental human power play and we always look at whether the speaker is saying something that benefits them for both sexes.
So what the law of female journalism points out is:
1. The social constructionist dogma running society right now leads people to ignore the obvious truth that beauty is a physical attribute social engineering can only change to a limited extent
2. The old school chivalric presumption against being mean to women combines with the new school feminist presumption of female moral superiority to mean women can say whatever they want
3. The inmates are running the asylum.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Hypnotoad666
That’s a cute piece of noticing by Steve. But someone really needs to test the (extremely plausible) hypothesis that the crash in the quality of our society since about 2014 is the direct result of its takeover by mid-wit females. Conformity, cancel culture, de-platforming, safety-obsession, social hysteria, the primacy of emotional reaction and “social constructs” over logic and objective truth. . . . we are living in an estrogen bath.
Sophistry is the appropriate term here.
“But someone really needs to test the (extremely plausible) hypothesis that the crash in the quality of our society since about 2014 is the direct result of its takeover by mid-wit females”
Wait, I thought the social sciences, in particular sociology and psychology, is fraught with misinterpretations and replication issue. Yet you implore that someone in these two disciplines create a study to examine this issue?
The hypocrisy by a number of commenters on this fine opinion webzine never ceases to amaze me.
I like short podcasts. Otherwise I’d rather read because I can read very fast and I hate wasting 2 hours.
Some podcasts I do enjoy listening in bed without the video.
Though sometimes podcasts are worth watching on the big screen, such as this walk and talk from magnificent Moscow.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UKcsEW-DyBY&si=LGg6NrnE_eups8rU
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields--ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all--and Steve popped our front and said "Hey fellows, let's think about civic nationalism!" ... then you'd have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense--with the open border, trannies, CRT--that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding--for most--has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB--which is an intellectual body blow to the "evil whitey!" narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on "next steps". I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the "differential totalitarianism"--the "who whom", who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies--their host--submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out "separation". Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents--enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off--what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths--like HBD--that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.Replies: @DCThrowback, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Colin Wright
To sum up your excellently reasoned response, I would just say, “Things are not bad enough for a majority of American citizens to seek out the answers of who is doing what to whom to see why America is an empire in decline.” But the numbers of those who are curious is growing, as is the number of those demanding answers. (A massive white pill is #bantheADL, for example.). Projected economic turmoil in 2024 and beyond will only add to those growing numbers.
One other note, since you mentioned him: RdS going back to continue to fortify the barricades around the Republic of Florida for 4 more years (and winning another re-election handily) is the best thing he can do for himself and America. The whites who make up the GOP believe (as do I) Trump was robbed of his rightful re-election in 2020. He is owed the opportunity to get his 2nd shot. While Steve seems to believe the Dems secretly want to face him, their actions give us several market signals the opposite is true (mostly, I believe, because they fear he learned from his mistakes the first time around and the damage he can cause is of the long lasting variety, as opposed to what someone like RdS or Christie would do – i.e., sell out to the uniparty, get stymied, continue appointing neocons to the state department, etc etc).
I agree Trump was robbed in '20. There's not really enough time left to put up with his BS - much better than anything out of the Dems, don't get me wrong - and wait for '28.
Donald Trump would do an excellent job as an organizer/leader of a new party. He doesn't have the ego to want to do that while someone else is President unfortunately.
What I think the ctrl-left fears is the words out of Donald Trump that stir up the people, not the actions he takes. He doesn't follow through on much, and nothing he does is permanent, so there's not much to fear there.Replies: @nebulafox, @DCThrowback
“Don’t you go out for a run, go to the gym, and/or drive?”
Actually, no, I don’t do any of those things. I hate running and to do it while I’m trying to avoid getting run over by bicyclists who ignore traffic laws is asking for death. I exercise at home and have never been to a gym. And I haven’t driven in 15 years.
I read much faster than I listen. Furthermore, I can’t avoid picking apart a speaker’s hesitations (um, like, etc.), mispronunciations, irritating voice, pointless diversions, and so on.
I have deliberately never listened to Mr. Sailer speak so as to avoid being disappointed in how he talks. As for what he writes, except for baseball, I’ll read anything that interests him.
“This uncontrolled delight [viz reading] is an escape from self; it ousts the intelligence from its function and allows it merely to follow point for point the thoughts of others, to be carried along in the stream of words, developments, chapters, volumes.”
Clearly Sertillanges was a mindless slavish dunce. Only imbeciles get carried along in the sometimes effluviunt stream of another person’s written words. Intelligent people contend with and converse with an author whilst they read. I’m confident good ol’ Serty – whoever he is, never heard of him! – had no inner monolog. Retards typically, unless externally stimuli’d, have no thoughts at all.
The dumbest people I’ve known always assumed I believe everything I read. This is of course projection: it is they who believe every nonsensical bit of retardation they read.
Tl;dr: reading is a deeply interactive activity for intelligent people
Not his first post-Fox WTF moment, but when I first saw the tweet, I thought it must be from some kind of parody account. What is Tucker’s motivation here? More views and attention? Is there really nothing better he and his team could come up with?
It’s been ‘crashing’ for a long time. I was told in 1983 that I would be rehired — if a black or Hispanic candidate couldn’t be found for my position. Some public schools became unusable back in the Sixties. Etc.
The seeds of this stuff go back at least a hundred years. It’s like reading about the evolution of the steam engine or something. Little baby steps like Stevenson’s Rocket metastasize into the mighty railroads of the turn of the century — or in the case of societal collapse, today.
‘Mid-wit females’ may not help — but they’re at least as much effect as cause. Actually, the whole notion of wholesale female participation in the public sphere is an extremely fraught question. What do you want to do? Put them all in purdah? Legally confine them to nursing and teaching elementary school?
These guys seem to take a lull in the creation of new anti-white policies as some permanent return to sanity.
“The law of female journalism states that the thing the lady really wants to say is that society should be reorganized so she is more attractive.”
I’m not convinced of this. Rush used to say something similar regarding the FemiNazis.
I do however think that the media has absolutely been captured by the Dems, male and female alike.
Erronius
Steve Sailer isn’t pro-white. He has argued against such a position. He had a debate with Jared Taylor about it.
I would never accuse Steve of anything. But, in general, think how easy it would be for the multi-billion dollar left-wing disinformation-industrial complex to put a thumb on the scale of the right-wing blogosphere by making anonymous contributions to humble bloggers, along with notes like: "I love your stuff, keep up the good work . . . luckily I can support you because you aren't one of those crazies who advocates for [Insert forbidden position re Trump; Covid; Ukraine; J6; etc.]."Replies: @Mike Tre
Look who Steve’s pet commenters are and what their positions are on those topics you used as examples.
Wait, what?? I don’t have anything much good to say about Chris Christie, but Ron DeSantis ALREADY knows better, while Trump didn’t before, and he ain’t learnin’ much new at 78 y/o.
I agree Trump was robbed in ’20. There’s not really enough time left to put up with his BS – much better than anything out of the Dems, don’t get me wrong – and wait for ’28.
Donald Trump would do an excellent job as an organizer/leader of a new party. He doesn’t have the ego to want to do that while someone else is President unfortunately.
What I think the ctrl-left fears is the words out of Donald Trump that stir up the people, not the actions he takes. He doesn’t follow through on much, and nothing he does is permanent, so there’s not much to fear there.
Non-uniparty candidates who win (think Jesse Ventura, Trump, Jimmy Carter) majoUr elections must take pages from the Clinton playbook written by Dick Morris post-'94; appear above the partisan fray, play both sides off each other and generally play the role of statesman. Leverage congressional hate to your advantage. Clinton, in a time of relative perceived prosperity, was able to do this after the shellacking in 1994. Trump tried to make nice with the GOP congress - they took his tax cut then promptly got whupped in the elections of 2018 before doing all the things that won him the election in 2016. The uniparty then attacked DJT w/ great vengeance on every false issue, including fake ass impeachment, Ukraine, collusion. All lies, all garbage. Trump failed to trust his well honed instincts and that was the major issue with his term, but the obstacles put in front of him, including a fake-ass made up plandemic response, were unparalleled. The uniparty REALLY hates competition.
My guess is Trump will begin dismantling the derp state in his first 100 days while attempting to peace out of Ukraine if he is allowed to take power.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
I agree Trump was robbed in '20. There's not really enough time left to put up with his BS - much better than anything out of the Dems, don't get me wrong - and wait for '28.
Donald Trump would do an excellent job as an organizer/leader of a new party. He doesn't have the ego to want to do that while someone else is President unfortunately.
What I think the ctrl-left fears is the words out of Donald Trump that stir up the people, not the actions he takes. He doesn't follow through on much, and nothing he does is permanent, so there's not much to fear there.Replies: @nebulafox, @DCThrowback
Donald Trump was what he needed to be: a walking, talking middle finger to the bipartisan elite and their bureaucratic masters who took a country that occupied unprecedented heights in 1990, drove it off a cliff, and yet somehow still occupy the heights despite a record of incompetence and venality that should disqualify anyone for public service. Tant pis that he wasn’t more.
Attempts to reverse the clock are going to fail, one way or another. They don’t have better ideas. The mentally degraded Joe Biden couldn’t have been a more fitting choice for a gerontocratic political class. They have no legitimacy in the eyes of ever increasing amounts of Americans, and won’t do what it takes to get it back. Even sustainable totalitarian regimes don’t rely purely on force to ensure the loyalty of their people: one way or another, they have to earn and keep legitimacy. It’s when you lose that and aren’t even aware of it or don’t assume there is a reason to care that you are living on borrowed time as a ruler.
One way or another, things will change. For better or worse, I have no idea.
Steve is not a white nationalist, but you don’t have to be a white nationalist to be pro-white. Steve has written extensively about the barely concealed anti-white hatred at the core of progressive social ideology — explicitly naming it as anti-white hatred, which is a big deal — and he has reached a significant audience, an audience that includes influential people. By any reasonable measure that counts as effective pro-white advocacy. The fact that he is not a white nationalist makes him more effective, not less.
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields--ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all--and Steve popped our front and said "Hey fellows, let's think about civic nationalism!" ... then you'd have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense--with the open border, trannies, CRT--that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding--for most--has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB--which is an intellectual body blow to the "evil whitey!" narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on "next steps". I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the "differential totalitarianism"--the "who whom", who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies--their host--submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out "separation". Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents--enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off--what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths--like HBD--that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.Replies: @DCThrowback, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Colin Wright
Ironically, I agree with more of what you say than Steve does.
As to Fed comment, that’s just beneath you. I’ve never advocated for – nor would I ever advocate for – people to do anything illegal. Indeed, whites can get in a lot of trouble doing legal things like lawfully protesting. We are dissidents now. Act that way.
Has it ever dawned on you that I might talk to a normie differently than I would talk to people already familiar with HBD?
But the truth is that Steve and many of his commentators are adamantly opposed to whites joining the identity politics game but then never offer an alternative. Well, that’s not true. They offer Citizenism, which has failed horribly for 50 years.
I find that odd, and try to get a few iSteve readers to stop hiding out in colorblind civic nationalism.
Steve has done much good for my (our?) side, but he’s not on our side. Indeed, unintentionally, Steve is a bit of a gatekeeper. Let whites talk about racial differences, but keep them in the colorblind CivNat reservation.
You got that right, but doesn’t it ever make you wonder why Steve persists with an utterly failed strategy like Citizenism. It was a reasonably plan 10 or 20 years ago, but not anymore. And, yet, Steve never moves on. Odd.
As to your “next steps,” we’re generally in agreement in regards to dealing with normies.
However, why can’t one of those steps be, “Hey, how come whites aren’t allowed to have political groups or business groups. Either we should be allowed to have them just like everyone else or no one should be allowed to have them.”
Finally, at the end of the day, other races are not just whites in dark face. They are different, and those difference include how they view the rights and obligations amongst people in a society and feelings of loyalty to their own kin. The morality embodied in the Constitution is simply not shared by the vast majority of non-whites.
Perhaps you hold out hope that you can cherry pick the non-whites that do feel a bond to that morality. Good luck. Those separate communities that you create based on “white” ideals will quickly become much nicer than other communities. At that point, how do you keep people out of those communities. Newcomers will swear their love for small government or free speech or whatever else you ask, not because they believe it but because they want to enjoy what your (mostly white) community has created. Sound familiar.
How do you stop a repeat of what we’re experiencing now?
You can’t test for what’s in a person’s heart – or their descendants. But you can test for race.
Does it have anything to do with the drowning of Obama’s chef at Obama’s home and Mass police not giving much information?
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields--ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all--and Steve popped our front and said "Hey fellows, let's think about civic nationalism!" ... then you'd have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense--with the open border, trannies, CRT--that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding--for most--has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB--which is an intellectual body blow to the "evil whitey!" narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on "next steps". I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the "differential totalitarianism"--the "who whom", who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies--their host--submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out "separation". Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents--enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off--what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths--like HBD--that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.Replies: @DCThrowback, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Colin Wright
But the Normie you describe is from 1985. Or 2005 at the latest.
Normies elected Donald Trump which shocked every single pundit (except a few Marxists like Michael Moore, interestingly enough). Then there was the whole January 6th event – did that seem Normie? I would say the Normies you are talking about don’t exist anymore or they are lingering in nursing homes.
We live in a world in which “Ban the ADL” is trending and the richest man in the world agrees. Tucker Carlson is the most popular pundit for whites by a mile and he openly says our elections are fake and Putin is a better guy than Biden. Grandma would be shocked.
Soon enough, the worldview you describe will be gone. It’s a dead man walking.
By the way, it’s the job of those who actually cared about our people to change Normie’s mindset. That work was done by others who actually did care.
Citation needed.
There are basically two different ways to see women. The first is the Right-wing conservative view, that sees women basically as property of men. In the Right-wing view, a “woman” is basically a baby-making machine. The only purpose of her existence is to make babies. To the Right-wing Hog, a “woman” is basically a life-support system for a vagina and a womb.
Then, there is the Liberal/Progressive/Humanist view of women, that a woman is an actual Human Being, and that, as a Human Being, she should have full control of her destiny and especially of her own body. Hence a woman can do any job that she wants as long as she is capable, and if she has an unwanted pregnancy and wants to abort, it is her call to make and not that of men, who do not own her body to do with it as they see fit.
Watching this video, it is an exposé on the Right-wing reactionary mentality. Steve Sailer’s views are not only utterly detestable, but he is also a hypocrite and at best a spinner that says half-trues, and at worst a liar.
First, there is his vile sexist trope of reducing all of women’s concerns to nothing more than jealousy and pettiness over looks. Sailer is a Right-wing Hog, and as a Right-wing Hog he puts immense emphasis on sexual dimorphism, because so much of conservatism resolves around organizing Society around sex roles. Conservatives are naturally not only tribalistic, but also hierarchical, and they like the idea of clearly defined roles
Yes, you can choose to emphasize the pattern that men “tend” to behave in certain ways, and that women “tend” to behave in other ways. But statistical tendencies are not really relevant, because our Society is organized around the concepts of individual merit and individual responsability. Even if more women than men find domestic chores and baby-sitting more enjoyable than men, that is immaterial because many do not, and they should be allowed to have the lives they see fit. For instance, suppose that a man murdered someone and that, in court, as defense, he decided to use as the argument that men commit over 98% of all murders, and that testosterone made him violent and that, therefore, his legal penalties for his crime should be forfeit. No one would accept that argument as defense. why? Because we recognize that only individuals have agency, not sexes or “races”.
The point is, you cannot use sex or the dubious concept of “race” to organize Society, because statistical trends to not have agency.
Steve Sailer also keeps bringing up that many transgendered individuals suffer from autogynephilia. “Look, they have a fetish! A fetish, I tell you! They are sick!”. Of course, Sailer doesn’t understand that this is also irrelevant. Not everyone in the World is as hateful and judgmental as you, Steve. I don’t care if a man likes to dress as a woman. It is completely harmless, and in a Free Society adults should do whatever they want as long as they do not use force on others.
Also, Sailer engages continuously in the classic Right-wing trope about the Transgender Movement wanting to mutilate children. In reality, the only genital mutilation of children that actually happens in America is the circumcision of non-consenting underage boys. But, of course, Sailer has no problems with that. Mutilation of children is ok as long as it is an American and religious tradition. There is a word for people that think like this: “hypocrite”. Such are the Right-wing biases and mentality.
Also, Sailer is boasting about how geneticists have proven that race is real because geneticists can tell your ancestry and from what part of the World your ancestors came from. For whatever reasons, Right-wing Hogs love to try to use “science”(pseudo) to prove their innate prejudices. They did it back in the 19th Century with phrenology, and they are now trying to do the same with genome analysis of ancestry. So, let’s talk about this.
First, two things. It is not true that genome-sequencing companies can tell from what place your ancestors came from. They indicate probability, and they give you a statistical odd for it. Secondly, and more importantly, what Steve Sailer doesn’t understand, probably because he has zero background in either genetics or molecular biology, that geneticists determine your ancestry by looking at very tiny segments of your DNA.
We have over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs in our genome. When a geneticist wants to determine where your ancestors came from, they look primarily at two single chromosomes: chromosome MT and the paternal Y chromosome. The total number of nucleotide base pairs that are to determine your “race” is less than 10,000. That is less than 0.00003% of your genome. Furthermore, the genes that determine “race” are all non-essential genes. For instance, one of the mutations that define Caucasian ancestry and codes for red hair is located in the MC1R gene. You could delete the entire gene and live. Conversely, there are genes that if you delete, you die while still a fetus or before the age of 20. Examples of these genes would be the LMNA or SOD2 genes. Deletion or malfunction of these genes cause death by cardiomyopathy before the age of 20 and embryonic lethality, respectively.
So, it is only a half-truth that geneticists have proven that “race” is biologically real; no, they have proven that genetic ancestry is real, which can be defined by a tiny number of variations in a number of non-essential genes. So, I guess “race” is real if you define it that way. But is it relevant? no.
Then, you got to love Sailer’s Boomer takes on gaming. Saying that gaming is a waste of time…compared to what? To talking about politics? Talking about politics is the biggest waste of time there is. No one ever convinces anyone of anything. I watched Sailer talk for an hour, and I disagreed with literally everything that he said. For instance, I am a liberal and I will be a liberal until the day that I die. If you are a naturally empathetic and considerate person, it is almost impossible to not be a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist. It comes with the territory of having empathy and care about the Humanity of other people, and not with artificial categorizations like the place where people are born, or what “race” they belong to. Likewise, conservatives never switch teams either. They are naturally more callous, more tribalistic and thrive in hierarchy – and their entire thinking is hierarchical and categorical in nature. But that’s fine. We don’t have to all like each other. I don’t like Right-wing Hogs like Sailer and his cadre, just like I’m sure that the Hogs don’t like me back. It is what it is.
But the good thing about Right-wing Hogs is that they are not very smart, so they don’t control much of the culture, institutions and discourse from the top. The interviewer kept talking about Sillicon Valley. Well, SV is as liberal and progressive as it comes. Right-wingers don’t excel at anything that involves using a brain.
https://qr.ae/pyd210
Neverthelss one of life’s ironies is that any male who claims to understand women is a fool. There are times when reason fails and intuition rules, but admitting that might make you a sissy boy, no. Yes indeed sexism is win-win all across the board.
White nationalism isn’t the issue. That’s an ideology from yesteryear. I agree that a pro-white doesn’t need to be a WN. But you’re projecting things on Steve that he himself denies.
Look at the debate between Jared Taylor and Steve Sailer and see for yourself. As Jared Taylor noted, Sailer’s vision of citizenism is eerily similar to the basic approach of Marxism. That is, extinguish natural instincts and go for some artificial construct. Sailer rejects racial consciousness for whites. That ain’t being pro-white.
Mid-wit females are definitely a lagging indicator. For some reason, there’s a cohort of guys who think everything was great until the early 2010s. I don’t know how anyone could think that. The affirmative action you mentioned had been enforced since the 70s. The federal destruction of white neighborhoods has been ongoing for 50 years (resulting in white flight).
These guys seem to take a lull in the creation of new anti-white policies as some permanent return to sanity.
Perhaps related to the various intelligence services — which, as we know, actually control society — becoming increasingly female, brown, and sexually bizarre?
Then, there is the Liberal/Progressive/Humanist view of women, that a woman is an actual Human Being, and that, as a Human Being, she should have full control of her destiny and especially of her own body. Hence a woman can do any job that she wants as long as she is capable, and if she has an unwanted pregnancy and wants to abort, it is her call to make and not that of men, who do not own her body to do with it as they see fit.
Watching this video, it is an exposé on the Right-wing reactionary mentality. Steve Sailer's views are not only utterly detestable, but he is also a hypocrite and at best a spinner that says half-trues, and at worst a liar.
First, there is his vile sexist trope of reducing all of women's concerns to nothing more than jealousy and pettiness over looks. Sailer is a Right-wing Hog, and as a Right-wing Hog he puts immense emphasis on sexual dimorphism, because so much of conservatism resolves around organizing Society around sex roles. Conservatives are naturally not only tribalistic, but also hierarchical, and they like the idea of clearly defined roles
Yes, you can choose to emphasize the pattern that men "tend" to behave in certain ways, and that women "tend" to behave in other ways. But statistical tendencies are not really relevant, because our Society is organized around the concepts of individual merit and individual responsability. Even if more women than men find domestic chores and baby-sitting more enjoyable than men, that is immaterial because many do not, and they should be allowed to have the lives they see fit. For instance, suppose that a man murdered someone and that, in court, as defense, he decided to use as the argument that men commit over 98% of all murders, and that testosterone made him violent and that, therefore, his legal penalties for his crime should be forfeit. No one would accept that argument as defense. why? Because we recognize that only individuals have agency, not sexes or "races".
The point is, you cannot use sex or the dubious concept of "race" to organize Society, because statistical trends to not have agency.
Steve Sailer also keeps bringing up that many transgendered individuals suffer from autogynephilia. "Look, they have a fetish! A fetish, I tell you! They are sick!". Of course, Sailer doesn't understand that this is also irrelevant. Not everyone in the World is as hateful and judgmental as you, Steve. I don't care if a man likes to dress as a woman. It is completely harmless, and in a Free Society adults should do whatever they want as long as they do not use force on others.
Also, Sailer engages continuously in the classic Right-wing trope about the Transgender Movement wanting to mutilate children. In reality, the only genital mutilation of children that actually happens in America is the circumcision of non-consenting underage boys. But, of course, Sailer has no problems with that. Mutilation of children is ok as long as it is an American and religious tradition. There is a word for people that think like this: "hypocrite". Such are the Right-wing biases and mentality.
Also, Sailer is boasting about how geneticists have proven that race is real because geneticists can tell your ancestry and from what part of the World your ancestors came from. For whatever reasons, Right-wing Hogs love to try to use "science"(pseudo) to prove their innate prejudices. They did it back in the 19th Century with phrenology, and they are now trying to do the same with genome analysis of ancestry. So, let's talk about this.
First, two things. It is not true that genome-sequencing companies can tell from what place your ancestors came from. They indicate probability, and they give you a statistical odd for it. Secondly, and more importantly, what Steve Sailer doesn't understand, probably because he has zero background in either genetics or molecular biology, that geneticists determine your ancestry by looking at very tiny segments of your DNA.
We have over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs in our genome. When a geneticist wants to determine where your ancestors came from, they look primarily at two single chromosomes: chromosome MT and the paternal Y chromosome. The total number of nucleotide base pairs that are to determine your "race" is less than 10,000. That is less than 0.00003% of your genome. Furthermore, the genes that determine "race" are all non-essential genes. For instance, one of the mutations that define Caucasian ancestry and codes for red hair is located in the MC1R gene. You could delete the entire gene and live. Conversely, there are genes that if you delete, you die while still a fetus or before the age of 20. Examples of these genes would be the LMNA or SOD2 genes. Deletion or malfunction of these genes cause death by cardiomyopathy before the age of 20 and embryonic lethality, respectively.
So, it is only a half-truth that geneticists have proven that "race" is biologically real; no, they have proven that genetic ancestry is real, which can be defined by a tiny number of variations in a number of non-essential genes. So, I guess "race" is real if you define it that way. But is it relevant? no.
Then, you got to love Sailer's Boomer takes on gaming. Saying that gaming is a waste of time...compared to what? To talking about politics? Talking about politics is the biggest waste of time there is. No one ever convinces anyone of anything. I watched Sailer talk for an hour, and I disagreed with literally everything that he said. For instance, I am a liberal and I will be a liberal until the day that I die. If you are a naturally empathetic and considerate person, it is almost impossible to not be a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist. It comes with the territory of having empathy and care about the Humanity of other people, and not with artificial categorizations like the place where people are born, or what "race" they belong to. Likewise, conservatives never switch teams either. They are naturally more callous, more tribalistic and thrive in hierarchy - and their entire thinking is hierarchical and categorical in nature. But that's fine. We don't have to all like each other. I don't like Right-wing Hogs like Sailer and his cadre, just like I'm sure that the Hogs don't like me back. It is what it is.
But the good thing about Right-wing Hogs is that they are not very smart, so they don't control much of the culture, institutions and discourse from the top. The interviewer kept talking about Sillicon Valley. Well, SV is as liberal and progressive as it comes. Right-wingers don't excel at anything that involves using a brain.Replies: @Anon, @Bardon Kaldian, @Observator, @Anonymous
To the Left-wing Sow, a “man” is basically a life-support system for a strong, independent woman. It’s the only purpose of his existence. Preferrably by laundering the fruits of his labor into her clean cash money by means of the state, thus ensuring she won’t even have to look at him.
Thank you for your thoroughly entertaining post! I think it’s important for adults to stay in touch with how an intelligent 17 yr old thinks. You have the perfect arguments to illustrate why readers keep coming back to Sailer. Whether they agree or disagree … whether there is hard data, or anecdote … whether he amuses or infuriates …whether they are fans or trolls … they cannot escape the sense that a quiet wisdom lurks in what he writes.
Steve used to have a quote prominently posted at the top of his blog …
“To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.”― George Orwell
You have a good mind and if you give yourself permission to think for yourself, to engage in that “constant struggle”, you will get there.
Good Luck to you in Speech and Debate this year!
Then, there is the Liberal/Progressive/Humanist view of women, that a woman is an actual Human Being, and that, as a Human Being, she should have full control of her destiny and especially of her own body. Hence a woman can do any job that she wants as long as she is capable, and if she has an unwanted pregnancy and wants to abort, it is her call to make and not that of men, who do not own her body to do with it as they see fit.
Watching this video, it is an exposé on the Right-wing reactionary mentality. Steve Sailer's views are not only utterly detestable, but he is also a hypocrite and at best a spinner that says half-trues, and at worst a liar.
First, there is his vile sexist trope of reducing all of women's concerns to nothing more than jealousy and pettiness over looks. Sailer is a Right-wing Hog, and as a Right-wing Hog he puts immense emphasis on sexual dimorphism, because so much of conservatism resolves around organizing Society around sex roles. Conservatives are naturally not only tribalistic, but also hierarchical, and they like the idea of clearly defined roles
Yes, you can choose to emphasize the pattern that men "tend" to behave in certain ways, and that women "tend" to behave in other ways. But statistical tendencies are not really relevant, because our Society is organized around the concepts of individual merit and individual responsability. Even if more women than men find domestic chores and baby-sitting more enjoyable than men, that is immaterial because many do not, and they should be allowed to have the lives they see fit. For instance, suppose that a man murdered someone and that, in court, as defense, he decided to use as the argument that men commit over 98% of all murders, and that testosterone made him violent and that, therefore, his legal penalties for his crime should be forfeit. No one would accept that argument as defense. why? Because we recognize that only individuals have agency, not sexes or "races".
The point is, you cannot use sex or the dubious concept of "race" to organize Society, because statistical trends to not have agency.
Steve Sailer also keeps bringing up that many transgendered individuals suffer from autogynephilia. "Look, they have a fetish! A fetish, I tell you! They are sick!". Of course, Sailer doesn't understand that this is also irrelevant. Not everyone in the World is as hateful and judgmental as you, Steve. I don't care if a man likes to dress as a woman. It is completely harmless, and in a Free Society adults should do whatever they want as long as they do not use force on others.
Also, Sailer engages continuously in the classic Right-wing trope about the Transgender Movement wanting to mutilate children. In reality, the only genital mutilation of children that actually happens in America is the circumcision of non-consenting underage boys. But, of course, Sailer has no problems with that. Mutilation of children is ok as long as it is an American and religious tradition. There is a word for people that think like this: "hypocrite". Such are the Right-wing biases and mentality.
Also, Sailer is boasting about how geneticists have proven that race is real because geneticists can tell your ancestry and from what part of the World your ancestors came from. For whatever reasons, Right-wing Hogs love to try to use "science"(pseudo) to prove their innate prejudices. They did it back in the 19th Century with phrenology, and they are now trying to do the same with genome analysis of ancestry. So, let's talk about this.
First, two things. It is not true that genome-sequencing companies can tell from what place your ancestors came from. They indicate probability, and they give you a statistical odd for it. Secondly, and more importantly, what Steve Sailer doesn't understand, probably because he has zero background in either genetics or molecular biology, that geneticists determine your ancestry by looking at very tiny segments of your DNA.
We have over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs in our genome. When a geneticist wants to determine where your ancestors came from, they look primarily at two single chromosomes: chromosome MT and the paternal Y chromosome. The total number of nucleotide base pairs that are to determine your "race" is less than 10,000. That is less than 0.00003% of your genome. Furthermore, the genes that determine "race" are all non-essential genes. For instance, one of the mutations that define Caucasian ancestry and codes for red hair is located in the MC1R gene. You could delete the entire gene and live. Conversely, there are genes that if you delete, you die while still a fetus or before the age of 20. Examples of these genes would be the LMNA or SOD2 genes. Deletion or malfunction of these genes cause death by cardiomyopathy before the age of 20 and embryonic lethality, respectively.
So, it is only a half-truth that geneticists have proven that "race" is biologically real; no, they have proven that genetic ancestry is real, which can be defined by a tiny number of variations in a number of non-essential genes. So, I guess "race" is real if you define it that way. But is it relevant? no.
Then, you got to love Sailer's Boomer takes on gaming. Saying that gaming is a waste of time...compared to what? To talking about politics? Talking about politics is the biggest waste of time there is. No one ever convinces anyone of anything. I watched Sailer talk for an hour, and I disagreed with literally everything that he said. For instance, I am a liberal and I will be a liberal until the day that I die. If you are a naturally empathetic and considerate person, it is almost impossible to not be a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist. It comes with the territory of having empathy and care about the Humanity of other people, and not with artificial categorizations like the place where people are born, or what "race" they belong to. Likewise, conservatives never switch teams either. They are naturally more callous, more tribalistic and thrive in hierarchy - and their entire thinking is hierarchical and categorical in nature. But that's fine. We don't have to all like each other. I don't like Right-wing Hogs like Sailer and his cadre, just like I'm sure that the Hogs don't like me back. It is what it is.
But the good thing about Right-wing Hogs is that they are not very smart, so they don't control much of the culture, institutions and discourse from the top. The interviewer kept talking about Sillicon Valley. Well, SV is as liberal and progressive as it comes. Right-wingers don't excel at anything that involves using a brain.Replies: @Anon, @Bardon Kaldian, @Observator, @Anonymous
That’s why conservatives are a threat to women …
https://qr.ae/pyd210
You’re just unhappy because Steve isn’t using his platform to say the things you would say if people were listening to you. But nobody is listening to you, while quite a few people are listening to Steve, and many of the things he has to say — naming and calling out anti-white hatred being merely one example — are extremely important and do in fact advance the interests of white people, without being tied to any specific racial ideology.
If what you are after is racial solidarity based on “natural instincts” (a concept I am a rather dubious about), then making white people understand that they are targets of hatred will help advance your cause. But even if all you want to do is end “reverse racism”, well, making white people understand that they are targets of hatred is still going to help your cause. Helping white people understand the forces arrayed against them is good for whites no matter what your specific political goals are. So I stand by what I said: Steve is one of the most effective and influential pro-white voices in America.
I’m against racist hate.
If so, you should explain why you hold out hope for a strategy that has achieved none of its goals for more than 50 years.
Indeed, it's biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system, thwarted while on office and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.
(You also might explain why you so dislike the most popular proponent of Citizenism.)Replies: @jb, @Corvinus
Bland and cagey. Great combination.
The issue here is that “anti-white” are subjective in nature. Say you are one who takes no umbrage to interracial marriage. (Poof) you’re anti-white. Say you believe in a white person who chooses to sell their domicile to a black family. (Poof) you’re anti-white. Ridiculous? Of course. Do you call out such nonsense? No.
But let’s give you credit. You’ve made a cottage industry out making white people THINK as a collective that they are decided targets of hatred by Jews and the Deep State elites.
Then, there is the Liberal/Progressive/Humanist view of women, that a woman is an actual Human Being, and that, as a Human Being, she should have full control of her destiny and especially of her own body. Hence a woman can do any job that she wants as long as she is capable, and if she has an unwanted pregnancy and wants to abort, it is her call to make and not that of men, who do not own her body to do with it as they see fit.
Watching this video, it is an exposé on the Right-wing reactionary mentality. Steve Sailer's views are not only utterly detestable, but he is also a hypocrite and at best a spinner that says half-trues, and at worst a liar.
First, there is his vile sexist trope of reducing all of women's concerns to nothing more than jealousy and pettiness over looks. Sailer is a Right-wing Hog, and as a Right-wing Hog he puts immense emphasis on sexual dimorphism, because so much of conservatism resolves around organizing Society around sex roles. Conservatives are naturally not only tribalistic, but also hierarchical, and they like the idea of clearly defined roles
Yes, you can choose to emphasize the pattern that men "tend" to behave in certain ways, and that women "tend" to behave in other ways. But statistical tendencies are not really relevant, because our Society is organized around the concepts of individual merit and individual responsability. Even if more women than men find domestic chores and baby-sitting more enjoyable than men, that is immaterial because many do not, and they should be allowed to have the lives they see fit. For instance, suppose that a man murdered someone and that, in court, as defense, he decided to use as the argument that men commit over 98% of all murders, and that testosterone made him violent and that, therefore, his legal penalties for his crime should be forfeit. No one would accept that argument as defense. why? Because we recognize that only individuals have agency, not sexes or "races".
The point is, you cannot use sex or the dubious concept of "race" to organize Society, because statistical trends to not have agency.
Steve Sailer also keeps bringing up that many transgendered individuals suffer from autogynephilia. "Look, they have a fetish! A fetish, I tell you! They are sick!". Of course, Sailer doesn't understand that this is also irrelevant. Not everyone in the World is as hateful and judgmental as you, Steve. I don't care if a man likes to dress as a woman. It is completely harmless, and in a Free Society adults should do whatever they want as long as they do not use force on others.
Also, Sailer engages continuously in the classic Right-wing trope about the Transgender Movement wanting to mutilate children. In reality, the only genital mutilation of children that actually happens in America is the circumcision of non-consenting underage boys. But, of course, Sailer has no problems with that. Mutilation of children is ok as long as it is an American and religious tradition. There is a word for people that think like this: "hypocrite". Such are the Right-wing biases and mentality.
Also, Sailer is boasting about how geneticists have proven that race is real because geneticists can tell your ancestry and from what part of the World your ancestors came from. For whatever reasons, Right-wing Hogs love to try to use "science"(pseudo) to prove their innate prejudices. They did it back in the 19th Century with phrenology, and they are now trying to do the same with genome analysis of ancestry. So, let's talk about this.
First, two things. It is not true that genome-sequencing companies can tell from what place your ancestors came from. They indicate probability, and they give you a statistical odd for it. Secondly, and more importantly, what Steve Sailer doesn't understand, probably because he has zero background in either genetics or molecular biology, that geneticists determine your ancestry by looking at very tiny segments of your DNA.
We have over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs in our genome. When a geneticist wants to determine where your ancestors came from, they look primarily at two single chromosomes: chromosome MT and the paternal Y chromosome. The total number of nucleotide base pairs that are to determine your "race" is less than 10,000. That is less than 0.00003% of your genome. Furthermore, the genes that determine "race" are all non-essential genes. For instance, one of the mutations that define Caucasian ancestry and codes for red hair is located in the MC1R gene. You could delete the entire gene and live. Conversely, there are genes that if you delete, you die while still a fetus or before the age of 20. Examples of these genes would be the LMNA or SOD2 genes. Deletion or malfunction of these genes cause death by cardiomyopathy before the age of 20 and embryonic lethality, respectively.
So, it is only a half-truth that geneticists have proven that "race" is biologically real; no, they have proven that genetic ancestry is real, which can be defined by a tiny number of variations in a number of non-essential genes. So, I guess "race" is real if you define it that way. But is it relevant? no.
Then, you got to love Sailer's Boomer takes on gaming. Saying that gaming is a waste of time...compared to what? To talking about politics? Talking about politics is the biggest waste of time there is. No one ever convinces anyone of anything. I watched Sailer talk for an hour, and I disagreed with literally everything that he said. For instance, I am a liberal and I will be a liberal until the day that I die. If you are a naturally empathetic and considerate person, it is almost impossible to not be a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist. It comes with the territory of having empathy and care about the Humanity of other people, and not with artificial categorizations like the place where people are born, or what "race" they belong to. Likewise, conservatives never switch teams either. They are naturally more callous, more tribalistic and thrive in hierarchy - and their entire thinking is hierarchical and categorical in nature. But that's fine. We don't have to all like each other. I don't like Right-wing Hogs like Sailer and his cadre, just like I'm sure that the Hogs don't like me back. It is what it is.
But the good thing about Right-wing Hogs is that they are not very smart, so they don't control much of the culture, institutions and discourse from the top. The interviewer kept talking about Sillicon Valley. Well, SV is as liberal and progressive as it comes. Right-wingers don't excel at anything that involves using a brain.Replies: @Anon, @Bardon Kaldian, @Observator, @Anonymous
I suspect the fundamental “woman question” among our rightist brethren is, “How do you get a woman to want you?” It’s pretty human to be frightened of what you do not understand, and to yearn to belittle or control it so you can look at yourself in the mirror without cringing.
Neverthelss one of life’s ironies is that any male who claims to understand women is a fool. There are times when reason fails and intuition rules, but admitting that might make you a sissy boy, no. Yes indeed sexism is win-win all across the board.
I just read Chadwick Moore’s new biography of Tucker called Tucker. It’s a sympathetic but candid account of his life. Tucker used to smoke two packs of Camels a day then quit. He was a heavy drinker until 2003; he started his day with a double screwdriver – four shots of vodka. He is friends with Hunter Biden. He gives out his cell phone number to everyone. Check it out.
Yes, but what are you for? Citizenism?
If so, you should explain why you hold out hope for a strategy that has achieved none of its goals for more than 50 years.
Indeed, it’s biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system, thwarted while on office and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.
(You also might explain why you so dislike the most popular proponent of Citizenism.)
Because he is a grifter and lawbreaker.
“thwarted while on office”
Of his own doing by having “Deep Staters” like Bolton and Barr, as well as Jew advisors.
“and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.”
Legitimate charges in several jurisdictions. Even Mr. Sailer knows Trump has a reputation for illicit activities.
You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be), but since the only racist hate in America that is not already being vociferously condemned is that which is directed at whites, by highlighting it and calling it out you have effectively made yourself a pro-white advocate, however racially neutral your own political ideals may be.
False premise. Racial preferences (what the fake word racism partially defines in its ever expanding umbrella) have nothing to do with hate. Preferring to live and work and do business with one's own kind isn't hate. In fact it's a fundamental component of basic survival.
Reasonable people should observe and understand the differences between different races, and be free to act accordingly. That is common sense, not hate.Replies: @jb
"I’m with the Indian, "
Well, there's part of the problem.Replies: @fish
“What the heck’s wrong with White people? ”
“I’m with the Indian, ”
Well, there’s part of the problem.
I’m not,”…with the Indian,” either but since we’re discussing politicians the white ones have hardly been a treat for whites.
OT – Chickens come home to roost:
This was entirely predictable. And yet no Democrat predicted it.
I agree Trump was robbed in '20. There's not really enough time left to put up with his BS - much better than anything out of the Dems, don't get me wrong - and wait for '28.
Donald Trump would do an excellent job as an organizer/leader of a new party. He doesn't have the ego to want to do that while someone else is President unfortunately.
What I think the ctrl-left fears is the words out of Donald Trump that stir up the people, not the actions he takes. He doesn't follow through on much, and nothing he does is permanent, so there's not much to fear there.Replies: @nebulafox, @DCThrowback
RdS took the (((money))), ran when he had no business doing so and sold out to dem boys w/ the hats. He’s learned something *now* we hope (i.e, putting his wife’s ambitions in a locker). RdS would make an awesome CoS for a Trump admin or a POTUS w/ great possibilities in 2028 (assuming the Republic is still a viable entity).
Non-uniparty candidates who win (think Jesse Ventura, Trump, Jimmy Carter) majoUr elections must take pages from the Clinton playbook written by Dick Morris post-’94; appear above the partisan fray, play both sides off each other and generally play the role of statesman. Leverage congressional hate to your advantage. Clinton, in a time of relative perceived prosperity, was able to do this after the shellacking in 1994. Trump tried to make nice with the GOP congress – they took his tax cut then promptly got whupped in the elections of 2018 before doing all the things that won him the election in 2016. The uniparty then attacked DJT w/ great vengeance on every false issue, including fake ass impeachment, Ukraine, collusion. All lies, all garbage. Trump failed to trust his well honed instincts and that was the major issue with his term, but the obstacles put in front of him, including a fake-ass made up plandemic response, were unparalleled. The uniparty REALLY hates competition.
My guess is Trump will begin dismantling the derp state in his first 100 days while attempting to peace out of Ukraine if he is allowed to take power.
He still uses – and enjoys – nicotine. Nothing wrong with that, but quitting smoking isn’t that hard if you switch to another form of nicotine use. To his credit, Tucker promotes just that.
Non-uniparty candidates who win (think Jesse Ventura, Trump, Jimmy Carter) majoUr elections must take pages from the Clinton playbook written by Dick Morris post-'94; appear above the partisan fray, play both sides off each other and generally play the role of statesman. Leverage congressional hate to your advantage. Clinton, in a time of relative perceived prosperity, was able to do this after the shellacking in 1994. Trump tried to make nice with the GOP congress - they took his tax cut then promptly got whupped in the elections of 2018 before doing all the things that won him the election in 2016. The uniparty then attacked DJT w/ great vengeance on every false issue, including fake ass impeachment, Ukraine, collusion. All lies, all garbage. Trump failed to trust his well honed instincts and that was the major issue with his term, but the obstacles put in front of him, including a fake-ass made up plandemic response, were unparalleled. The uniparty REALLY hates competition.
My guess is Trump will begin dismantling the derp state in his first 100 days while attempting to peace out of Ukraine if he is allowed to take power.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
My guess is the Trump would spend too much time tweeting about how he hates most of the people he just hired and making more BS promises to do any of that. I hope you are right though.
If so, you should explain why you hold out hope for a strategy that has achieved none of its goals for more than 50 years.
Indeed, it's biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system, thwarted while on office and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.
(You also might explain why you so dislike the most popular proponent of Citizenism.)Replies: @jb, @Corvinus
Trump wasn’t attacked because he was a citizenist. He was attacked because he was a flaming jackass who handed his head to his enemies on a silver platter so many times that it is impossible to keep count. He is by far the most incompetent politician I’ve ever seen in my life — which is deeply tragic, because he has a great platform (that’s what got him elected, not his winning personality), and if he had had the skills to follow through he could have engineered a realignment in American (and perhaps Western?) politics. He held all the strongest cards — Jobs! Immigration! Foreign Wars! — and he pissed all over those cards and made it so much harder for anyone else to use them. He is precisely the disaster I was afraid he might be back in 2016.
The time will come, someday,to speak out,but not now.
Race,sex,the Jews,the wars,immigration,all that stuff might upset the precious white suburban woman,so keep it on the DL.
Trumps a jerk,who screwed things up,but at least the SOB bloodied the other guys nose.
He brought these issues out.Replies: @jb
Sadly, Trump hired the kind of moderate Establishment clowns that got us in this mess.
However, Trump was still way better than any alternative. And hd has changed our culture whether he wanted to or not.Replies: @HallParvey
If so, you should explain why you hold out hope for a strategy that has achieved none of its goals for more than 50 years.
Indeed, it's biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system, thwarted while on office and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.
(You also might explain why you so dislike the most popular proponent of Citizenism.)Replies: @jb, @Corvinus
“Indeed, it’s biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system”
Because he is a grifter and lawbreaker.
“thwarted while on office”
Of his own doing by having “Deep Staters” like Bolton and Barr, as well as Jew advisors.
“and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.”
Legitimate charges in several jurisdictions. Even Mr. Sailer knows Trump has a reputation for illicit activities.
“I’m against racist hate”
Bland and cagey. Great combination.
The issue here is that “anti-white” are subjective in nature. Say you are one who takes no umbrage to interracial marriage. (Poof) you’re anti-white. Say you believe in a white person who chooses to sell their domicile to a black family. (Poof) you’re anti-white. Ridiculous? Of course. Do you call out such nonsense? No.
But let’s give you credit. You’ve made a cottage industry out making white people THINK as a collective that they are decided targets of hatred by Jews and the Deep State elites.
“Hopefully, more people will be acquainted with the First Law of Female Journalism. The world WILL be a better place if it is known widely”
It’s laughably unscientific.
Yes,Corvie is a girl. Guys?
Then, there is the Liberal/Progressive/Humanist view of women, that a woman is an actual Human Being, and that, as a Human Being, she should have full control of her destiny and especially of her own body. Hence a woman can do any job that she wants as long as she is capable, and if she has an unwanted pregnancy and wants to abort, it is her call to make and not that of men, who do not own her body to do with it as they see fit.
Watching this video, it is an exposé on the Right-wing reactionary mentality. Steve Sailer's views are not only utterly detestable, but he is also a hypocrite and at best a spinner that says half-trues, and at worst a liar.
First, there is his vile sexist trope of reducing all of women's concerns to nothing more than jealousy and pettiness over looks. Sailer is a Right-wing Hog, and as a Right-wing Hog he puts immense emphasis on sexual dimorphism, because so much of conservatism resolves around organizing Society around sex roles. Conservatives are naturally not only tribalistic, but also hierarchical, and they like the idea of clearly defined roles
Yes, you can choose to emphasize the pattern that men "tend" to behave in certain ways, and that women "tend" to behave in other ways. But statistical tendencies are not really relevant, because our Society is organized around the concepts of individual merit and individual responsability. Even if more women than men find domestic chores and baby-sitting more enjoyable than men, that is immaterial because many do not, and they should be allowed to have the lives they see fit. For instance, suppose that a man murdered someone and that, in court, as defense, he decided to use as the argument that men commit over 98% of all murders, and that testosterone made him violent and that, therefore, his legal penalties for his crime should be forfeit. No one would accept that argument as defense. why? Because we recognize that only individuals have agency, not sexes or "races".
The point is, you cannot use sex or the dubious concept of "race" to organize Society, because statistical trends to not have agency.
Steve Sailer also keeps bringing up that many transgendered individuals suffer from autogynephilia. "Look, they have a fetish! A fetish, I tell you! They are sick!". Of course, Sailer doesn't understand that this is also irrelevant. Not everyone in the World is as hateful and judgmental as you, Steve. I don't care if a man likes to dress as a woman. It is completely harmless, and in a Free Society adults should do whatever they want as long as they do not use force on others.
Also, Sailer engages continuously in the classic Right-wing trope about the Transgender Movement wanting to mutilate children. In reality, the only genital mutilation of children that actually happens in America is the circumcision of non-consenting underage boys. But, of course, Sailer has no problems with that. Mutilation of children is ok as long as it is an American and religious tradition. There is a word for people that think like this: "hypocrite". Such are the Right-wing biases and mentality.
Also, Sailer is boasting about how geneticists have proven that race is real because geneticists can tell your ancestry and from what part of the World your ancestors came from. For whatever reasons, Right-wing Hogs love to try to use "science"(pseudo) to prove their innate prejudices. They did it back in the 19th Century with phrenology, and they are now trying to do the same with genome analysis of ancestry. So, let's talk about this.
First, two things. It is not true that genome-sequencing companies can tell from what place your ancestors came from. They indicate probability, and they give you a statistical odd for it. Secondly, and more importantly, what Steve Sailer doesn't understand, probably because he has zero background in either genetics or molecular biology, that geneticists determine your ancestry by looking at very tiny segments of your DNA.
We have over 3 billion nucleotide base pairs in our genome. When a geneticist wants to determine where your ancestors came from, they look primarily at two single chromosomes: chromosome MT and the paternal Y chromosome. The total number of nucleotide base pairs that are to determine your "race" is less than 10,000. That is less than 0.00003% of your genome. Furthermore, the genes that determine "race" are all non-essential genes. For instance, one of the mutations that define Caucasian ancestry and codes for red hair is located in the MC1R gene. You could delete the entire gene and live. Conversely, there are genes that if you delete, you die while still a fetus or before the age of 20. Examples of these genes would be the LMNA or SOD2 genes. Deletion or malfunction of these genes cause death by cardiomyopathy before the age of 20 and embryonic lethality, respectively.
So, it is only a half-truth that geneticists have proven that "race" is biologically real; no, they have proven that genetic ancestry is real, which can be defined by a tiny number of variations in a number of non-essential genes. So, I guess "race" is real if you define it that way. But is it relevant? no.
Then, you got to love Sailer's Boomer takes on gaming. Saying that gaming is a waste of time...compared to what? To talking about politics? Talking about politics is the biggest waste of time there is. No one ever convinces anyone of anything. I watched Sailer talk for an hour, and I disagreed with literally everything that he said. For instance, I am a liberal and I will be a liberal until the day that I die. If you are a naturally empathetic and considerate person, it is almost impossible to not be a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist. It comes with the territory of having empathy and care about the Humanity of other people, and not with artificial categorizations like the place where people are born, or what "race" they belong to. Likewise, conservatives never switch teams either. They are naturally more callous, more tribalistic and thrive in hierarchy - and their entire thinking is hierarchical and categorical in nature. But that's fine. We don't have to all like each other. I don't like Right-wing Hogs like Sailer and his cadre, just like I'm sure that the Hogs don't like me back. It is what it is.
But the good thing about Right-wing Hogs is that they are not very smart, so they don't control much of the culture, institutions and discourse from the top. The interviewer kept talking about Sillicon Valley. Well, SV is as liberal and progressive as it comes. Right-wingers don't excel at anything that involves using a brain.Replies: @Anon, @Bardon Kaldian, @Observator, @Anonymous
Sorry, Steve, for the re-post. This was supposed to be in reply to the Anonymous[114] at 5:15 am GMT.
Who is Chatty Cathys?
Is he that Asian Indian guy who was granted access to everyone’s tax returns in the U.S. for purpose of figuring out whether forced relocation of poor persons to high median-income zip codes could get them out of poverty?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatty_Cathy
What I REALLY hate is an otherwise really nice job by a pundit on video who's distracting the hell out of me by driving or walking around town while doing it. That's insane. Park the car, go inside and sit the fuck down... in your closet. OK, now go ahead. What was the middle part again?
BTW, the guy in your 1920 book excerpt would surely not recommend listening to a podcast while outside "reading in the book of nature".Replies: @Inquiring Mind
Is that like listening to a podcast while answering the call of nature?
Is he that Asian Indian guy who was granted access to everyone's tax returns in the U.S. for purpose of figuring out whether forced relocation of poor persons to high median-income zip codes could get them out of poverty?Replies: @epebble
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatty_Cathy
“That’s a cute piece of noticing by Steve.”
Sophistry is the appropriate term here.
“But someone really needs to test the (extremely plausible) hypothesis that the crash in the quality of our society since about 2014 is the direct result of its takeover by mid-wit females”
Wait, I thought the social sciences, in particular sociology and psychology, is fraught with misinterpretations and replication issue. Yet you implore that someone in these two disciplines create a study to examine this issue?
The hypocrisy by a number of commenters on this fine opinion webzine never ceases to amaze me.
“You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be),”
False premise. Racial preferences (what the fake word racism partially defines in its ever expanding umbrella) have nothing to do with hate. Preferring to live and work and do business with one’s own kind isn’t hate. In fact it’s a fundamental component of basic survival.
Reasonable people should observe and understand the differences between different races, and be free to act accordingly. That is common sense, not hate.
I’m with the Indian, who seemingly/unbelievably is the only presidential candidate who will state the obvious straightforwardly:Vivek Ramaswamy on Twitter September 6th: “There are two sexes. If you have XX chromosomes, you’re a woman. If you have XY chromosomes, you’re a man. Period. Gender dysphoria is a mental health disorder. Affirming a kid’s confusion isn’t compassion. It’s cruelty.”What the heck’s wrong with White people?Replies: @Danindc, @Bumpkin, @Anon, @Mike Tre, @Achmed E. Newman, @BB753, @Reg Cæsar, @Adolf Smith
I wonder if SS would agree with my contention that a major turning point in WW T was the grotesque ESPN awards dinner given in honor of Bruce Jenner.
I did my own prognostication as I sat in front of muh TV,( its hard to predict things,especially the future) as I thought,”Seeing all these sports stars and celebs,like Markie Mark,actually going along with the preposterous notion that this Olympic champ and father was a woman is going to be a really bad thing for the ‘yutes,’ as it will further the acceptance of this horseshit.”
White people are so stupid. I saw maybe one or two black athletes shaking their heads, at least,but the whites, even tough guy Markie,were all in on this spectacle. Who was the first guy to stop clapping for Jenner,that slob?
It’s laughably unscientific.Replies: @Adolf Smith
I have had,lately,the suspicion that Corvinus is really Corvina!
Yes,Corvie is a girl. Guys?
I did an Agree on ya,but I can’t help but think your comment is an example of the consevative credo that victory can only be attained by never,ever,ever fighting back.
The time will come, someday,to speak out,but not now.
Race,sex,the Jews,the wars,immigration,all that stuff might upset the precious white suburban woman,so keep it on the DL.
Trumps a jerk,who screwed things up,but at least the SOB bloodied the other guys nose.
He brought these issues out.
If we were lined up for battle we normies banging our shields--ready to charge across the field toward their fluttering rainbow banners, and kill them all--and Steve popped our front and said "Hey fellows, let's think about civic nationalism!" ... then you'd have a great point.
You seem confused about where we are.
Where we are is normies are out living their normie lives under a continuous assault of minoritarian propaganda and demographic immivasion. Normies increasingly sense--with the open border, trannies, CRT--that something is deeply wrong. But they still swim in the propaganda and any clear understanding--for most--has not yet formed.
Steve is one of the lead figures in reintroducing clear thinking about race, about HDB--which is an intellectual body blow to the "evil whitey!" narrative underpinning the minoritarian assault on white gentile nations. And done it, in an honest decent straightforward way, that people can grasp and help them build counter-minoritarian views and politics and ultimately community around.
This is how you actually accomplish something.
~~
I tend to disagree with Steve on "next steps". I do not think we are turning this ship around.
I think the path is to highlight the "differential totalitarianism"--the "who whom", who is coercing whom. The minoritarian parasites demand that we normies--their host--submit. We normies do not actually need anything from them and are just fine if they simply go-away.
And start building out "separation". Do the stuff DeSantis had started doing. Pushing off their propaganda. Do stuff like school choice to get our kids out from under their indoctrination. (Put in my competency test regime as well for a college work around.) Move along toward community separation. Work toward communities that can choose their residents--enforce a community border. Build toward and ultimate separation of rainbows from Americans.
But any of this starts with getting the blinkers off--what Steve is doing. Getting people to grab ahold of clear truths--like HBD--that they already know but do not have respectable words for. Pointing out other truths, debunking the minoritarian lies and excuses. Give normies the tools to reject the deluge of minoritarian propaganda and diktat.
Moving people mentally. Building resistance.
Yelping while providing nothing for normies to grab a hold of and counter the deluge of b.s. does nothing.Replies: @DCThrowback, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Colin Wright
It’s certainly a possibility. Twenty years ago, the FBI was paying informants nearly $100,000 to find and manipulate likely candidates into attempting some act of ‘Islamic terror.’ Remember some of those clowns? It was getting to be the ‘bozo of the month’ club.
That was $100,000 back before Biden Bucks. I wonder what the FBI pays now? If one could be somehow be assured of immunity from prosecution, it would be fun to run wild across the internet and see who your new friends are and who is encouraging you to take more concrete action. Take your inner Andrew Anglin for a walk and see who you meet.
If you think Sinclair is delusional (his story, unchanged, has been squashed since 2008; he even had a press conference) then you are the delusional one. That Obama is gay and “Michelle”, aka Michael LaVaughn Robinson) , is old news for a long time. At least since that comedienne let it out in 2014 and died soon after. Once you see the picture of the real parents of the Obama daughters, you know. They were friends of Obama, the mother is a doctor. The younger daughter looks just like the mother (Anita Blanchard), the older just the father, whose name is Martin Nesbitt. You can still find it on Rumble.
The “Obamas” were a major fraud and joke imposed on the gullible world. Many, many people know, but the readers of this site are always surprisingly badly informed. They go on and on about the lies of mainstream media, and then believe it all for fear of being a conspiracy “theorist.” oooh–what a title.
Trump still thinks he’s living in Nixon’s America. He’s trying to appeal to that type of Normie worldview which is dying off. But Trump’s style shook USA dullards to their cores. The Stuff White People Like crowd, in between helping their daughter get mutilated by psycho doctors, were just outraged!
Sadly, Trump hired the kind of moderate Establishment clowns that got us in this mess.
However, Trump was still way better than any alternative. And hd has changed our culture whether he wanted to or not.
The time will come, someday,to speak out,but not now.
Race,sex,the Jews,the wars,immigration,all that stuff might upset the precious white suburban woman,so keep it on the DL.
Trumps a jerk,who screwed things up,but at least the SOB bloodied the other guys nose.
He brought these issues out.Replies: @jb
I strongly believe in fighting back, but we are not fighting from a position of strength, and we desperately need to avoid friendly fire. Trump did bring these issues out (not the Jews though — he doesn’t seem to have the Jew Thing, for which I am extremely grateful, because I think that one is a huge loser), and if he had played his cards right and been more careful with his words he could have had even the suburban women nodding along, but instead I am afraid that in the end he has made the situation worse, that all in all he has made our enemies stronger. I don’t want four more years of Biden, but Trump is so profoundly erratic and irresponsible that leaving aside all political and ideological considerations the thought of him in the White House for another four years scares me just as much. And I don’t see any white knights on the horizon. DeSantis seems to have the most potential, so he would be my pick — once in power he might (or might not) turn into a “smart Trump.” But he seems to be nowhere near overtaking Trump in the polls.
Frankly, at this point I am rooting for a health crisis.
False premise. Racial preferences (what the fake word racism partially defines in its ever expanding umbrella) have nothing to do with hate. Preferring to live and work and do business with one's own kind isn't hate. In fact it's a fundamental component of basic survival.
Reasonable people should observe and understand the differences between different races, and be free to act accordingly. That is common sense, not hate.Replies: @jb
There is in fact a such thing as “racist hate” (which can be directed at whites, blacks, or others), and it is not the same as “racial preference”. The former is bad, the latter is neutral.
Predators search for prey. Being old and alone defines a person who qualifies.
Unfortunately, in the modern world the people charged with protecting the elderly are hamstrung by the legal requirements of their professions.
Somehow, I doubt that the lady in question was related to a local criminal kingpin. After all, boiling in oil is still available to some.
Sadly, Trump hired the kind of moderate Establishment clowns that got us in this mess.
However, Trump was still way better than any alternative. And hd has changed our culture whether he wanted to or not.Replies: @HallParvey
Unfortunately, apparently that’s all that’s available.
What kind of hate is acceptable?
Of course it's true that the meaning hate is often stretched beyond reasonable bounds. And there is also the problem that I may see you as doing harm while you see what you are doing as good. Fortunately there are gradations of hatred, from mild annoyance to "You slaughtered...", and it's usually possible to pick something appropriate.
There are those saintly individuals who preach that all hatred is misguided, but for myself I would say hatred for those who do harm, either to yourself or others. You know: “I hate you because you slaughtered my family, burned my village, and pillaged my sheep!”
Of course it’s true that the meaning hate is often stretched beyond reasonable bounds. And there is also the problem that I may see you as doing harm while you see what you are doing as good. Fortunately there are gradations of hatred, from mild annoyance to “You slaughtered…”, and it’s usually possible to pick something appropriate.
Are these the same suburban women who hated Romney for being a vicious dog-abuser? Maybe you should consider who puts these ideas in the heads of silly females?