The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Ilhan Omar Escapes with a Narrow Victory
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Back in August 2020, the mighty American Israel Political Action Committee was out to get Democratic Congresswoman and Squad member Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu) for mentioning that Jews donate a lot to the Democratic Party. AIPAC tried to prove her wrong by pouring in millions in Jewish donations to her rival. But during 2020’s Racial Reckoning, she cruised to renomination in the Democratic primary over a fellow black leftist:

This August, she won again, but, even though (or perhaps because) AIPAC sat this one out, Omar’s margin over a black anti-crime centrist who campaigned against her on police issues was much narrower:

It’s almost as if crime doesn’t pay for the Democrats.

 
Hide 86 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Non-Whites don’t actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They’ll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    • Replies: @JimB
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship


    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.
     
    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Reg Cæsar

    , @Diversity Heretic
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    I very much hope that you are right, but whites are also demoralized and internally divided. White identitarianism is considered white supremacy and will be hit with the hardest possible legal sanctions. I see no bright future for a white plurality or minority in the United States.

    , @AndrewR
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    https://youtu.be/XBZUz4C6kqk

    , @Jack P
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    I hope you're right, but I'm skeptical.

    , @bomag
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    Not quite the dynamic I see.

    Half of Whites are happy to give away their heritage for either 30 pieces of silver, or some status among the non-Whites.

    This will continue until the money is gone, or the Givers are shut down by the Doers.

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    We'll see. If the IQ-worshipping, individual-uber-alles commenters around here are any indication, whites will never pull together.

    Thankfully, the commenters around here are distinctly not normal - though in their isolated neighborhoods, it can feel that way.

    Even a small percentage of whites embracing group identity could be a serious force to be reckoned with. And, more importantly, an attractive alternative to fence-sitting whites.

    Despite the protests around here, colorblind civic nationalism is rapidly losing its appeal among average whites. The crew around here is protected by their academic abilities which allow them to avoid almost all of the current hate Whitey policies.

    However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ - Jews. They're desperate to keep whites on the colorblind CivNat plantation.

    (Ever notice how Jack D, the ultimate Zionist, and the rest of the Jew crew are so adamant about whites sticking with the colorblind civic nationalism plan.)

    They know who is their real competition, and they'll fight hard to keep them out of the ring.

    Now, why Sailer is king of the colorblind CivNats is more of a mystery. Could be his nature, could be the time he was brought up, or it could be something much more personal. Who knows.

    But it's something very important because he's willing to write piece that make him seem, shall we say, not very astute. And if nothing IQ-worshiupers hate more than to look stupid.

    Replies: @anon, @Jack D, @Pixo

    , @Currahee
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    First, cull the rats.

    , @Seaman
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    Whites on the left won't be part of a "cohesive group". They'll simply split into factions of oppressed minorities they prefer to other "racist" Caucasians.

    , @Truth
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    You might want to start practicing, here.

  2. It looks like her popularity is way down — as is the number of voters in 2022 vs 2020. Her opponent Don Daniels came so close. He must be very frustrated.

    • Replies: @JubalE
    @notsaying

    Maybe he should marry her.

  3. Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats. Stop the presses!

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Hypnotoad666

    Calling Omar a "black Democrat" like she's Al Sharpton is very odd, but go off.

    , @11B4P
    @Hypnotoad666


    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats.
     
    The District is 63.6% White and only 16.6% Black. Its Minnesotas 5th congressional district.

    Replies: @HammerJack

    , @Hibernian
    @Hypnotoad666

    He's marginally less Leftist than she is. Also a major embarrassment to American society would have been removed from the House if he had won.

    Replies: @anonymous

  4. Also the total number of votes was much lower in the off-season election. 110k vs 170k. That could have an effect. It’s possible the marginal voters who can get turned out (or farmed) in a presidential year break heavily to Ilhan.

    • Agree: Not Raul
    • Replies: @hhsiii
    @Moral Stone

    She got fewer votes than her last opponent got. I guess it was easier to rock the vote during peak COVID.

    Replies: @Barnard

    , @Servant of Gla'aki
    @Moral Stone


    Also the total number of votes was much lower in the off-season election.
     
    Yes, but there's still about a 15 percent decline, as compared to the 2018 (midterm) numbers.
  5. While it is heartening to see the likes of Ilhan Omar take a shot across the bow, it is also satisfying to watch her and the few others in her camp get a few shots of their own in against those who have far too much influence over our government.

    Such is the pathetic perspective allowed to a White man in America today.

    I risk the ire of my Jewish friends here for saying this, but I am getting a little kick out of watching corrupt Muslims take public shots at what amounts to the Zionist Powers That Be in my ancestors’ country.

    Those ancestors left this country to me, to their Posterity (a word they capitalized in the Constitution they wrote.) But this is not my country anymore, when a “bureau” that is not even in the Constitution can raid a former president’s home on vague legal technicalities for obvious political purposes and intimidation.

    No, the Ilman Omars and the Zionists they envy can take this place and shove it.

    • Agree: AnotherDad, tyrone, wj, TWS, Old Prude
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Buzz Mohawk


    The question Whether one generation of men has a right to bind another, seems never to have been started either on this or our side of the water… (But) between society and society, or generation and generation there is no municipal obligation, no umpire but the law of nature. We seem not to have perceived that, by the law of nature, one generation is to another as one independant nation to another… On similar ground it may be proved that no society can make a perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law. The earth belongs always to the living generation… Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of 19. years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force and not of right.
     
    Guess who wrote this, buddy.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Omar is extremely useful to my cause and a pain in the ass to the Jews. I wish her well.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

  6. This August, she won again, but, even though AIPAC sat this one out

    Omar demonstrated herself to be sufficiently anti-White. On that, the most important issue, she passes and became acceptable.

  7. AIPAC also failed to knock off Squaddie Rashida Tlalib with Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey. Not sure if she’s related to Oprah, but the name made clear that she was black but black voters went with the Pali.

    Detroit now has no black congressmen for the first time since 1956, since a Hindu techbro just spent \$6 million winning the other Detroit black seat.

    AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. So they are basically 2-2.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    @Pixo

    Wasn't Kennedy planning to make groups like AIPAC register as foreign agencies shortly before a lone nutjob made some amazing shots and was subsequently forever-silenced by a Zionist mobster who confessed to his rabbi that he was afraid that if the truth got out it would result in the ultimate Holocaust of his people shortly before he died conveniently in jail?

    Replies: @Pixo, @Hypnotoad666

    , @Anon
    @Pixo

    [[AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. ]]


    Don't be a fool. Both Omar and Tlalib are under Jewish mafia control. The AIPAC needs slaves to support the bills against Iran that come to the whore houses, the congress and senate, to pass. Check for yourself to see that these 'black progressives', Omar, Cori Bush and Tlalib, have voted YES for every single bill AGAINST Iran written by the traitor zionists 'representatives' to satisfy their masters, the Jewish mafia. Why does AIPAC want to remove its slaves who are under control?
    Today, 75% of the slaves who are selected by the Jewish money to go to congress, senate or other center of power are BLACKS. No one has respect for these zionist black slaves anymore who are ready to kiss the Jewish mafia's behind. This is NOT democracy only hypocrisy. Only fools are voting.

    The 'timesofIsrael' reproted:

    [A new super PAC led by “Black and Jewish” leaders has endorsed five Black Democrats who have positions that are friendly to AIPAC, the latest sign that pro-Israel donors are determined to stem erosion of support for Israel among African Americans.]

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    https://forward.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shontel-brown-gotv.jpg

    Replies: @Evocatus, @Pixo, @Charon

  8. Well she won, so it’s almost it’s almost like crime doesn’t pay for the Democrats.

  9. Ted Kennedy almost was convicted of murder. Almost.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @anon

    Everything is wrong with this statement and your point is unclear. Kennedy surely killed Kopechne through alcohol-exacerbated negligence. He dodged any serious charge, let alone punishment, through pseudo-feudal privilege: he simply waited for his blood to clear of testable alcohol, and the police, wouldn't you know it, were kind enough to wait with him; and top level friends of House Kennedy worked to Correct The Record in the already sympathetic newsmedia. Plus the moon landing happened at the same time so no one was watching. At no point would he have been culpable for murder. There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @HammerJack

  10. I had multiple colleagues in China watching this election very closely. Let’s just say that I connected them with the right US Citizens to facilitate donations to her campaign. Very proud of her.

  11. The difference this time was that her opponent went after GOP votes. I got bombarded with emails and ads for Samuel probably based on my GOP status, and I voted in the Dem primary rather than the Republican one. A more focused effort in this regard may do her in next time.

  12. anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:

    Are we sure AIPAC has completely cleared out? The Israel Lobby has a 50-year winning streak of ousting Congressmen who quarrel too much with Israel.

    “Israel controls the United States Senate,” J. William Fulbright told Face the Nation in 1973.

    13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.

    When Tucker was 10, Dick remarried to Patricia Swanson of the Swanson frozen dinner fortune; her uncle was Senator J. William Fulbright.

    I am sure Tucker Carlson understands the power the of the Israel Lobby better than most in Washington.

    • Replies: @anon
    @anonymous


    Are we sure AIPAC has completely cleared out? The Israel Lobby has a 50-year winning streak of ousting Congressmen who quarrel too much with Israel.
     
    Jewish supremacists have always been more concerned with Whites than about the Zionist entity. Remember what “the Jewish state” is for: its purpose is to segregate Jews from (primarily) Whites. The Zionist entity is merely a means to an end. A more effective way to deal with Whites is to eliminate them as a separate group altogether. Mass immigration and anti-Whites like Tlaib and Omar are moving the country toward that end. Jewish supremacists are therefore ambivalent about them.
    , @Pixo
    @anonymous

    “13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.”

    He lost, by 2-1 margin, because he was an inferior politician to Dale Bumpers, and because he had evolved from a segregationist into a George McGovern type liberal. His primary loss was similar to liberal Democrat incumbent Ralph Yarborough’s six years earlier in Texas to centrist Lloyd Bentson.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @International Jew, @Paleo Liberal

  13. The fact that she could be elected to any district in America, let alone one in Minnesota…

    • Replies: @Kylie
    @Patrick in SC

    "The fact that she could be elected to any district in America, let alone one in Minnesota…"

    The fact that she could be in America, let alone Minnesota…

  14. OT:

    If you will it, it is no dream. Internet trad caths are real and influencing culture.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/08/09/opinion/nyc-catholicism-dimes-square-religion.amp.html

    Nobody young and smart is a libtard. It’s been exhausted and found wanting, to put it mildly. Reddit atheism is literally a meme that’s mocked just by describing it as such.

    • Replies: @ADL Pyramid of Hate
    @Whereismyhandle

    Senior editor at First Things brags about how Catholicism is the religion of Oscar Wilde, Honor Levy, BDSM exhibits at the Met, literally “perverts,” and not demanding “authentic internal conversion.” With trads like these, who needs libtards?

  15. @Pixo
    AIPAC also failed to knock off Squaddie Rashida Tlalib with Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey. Not sure if she’s related to Oprah, but the name made clear that she was black but black voters went with the Pali.

    Detroit now has no black congressmen for the first time since 1956, since a Hindu techbro just spent $6 million winning the other Detroit black seat.

    AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. So they are basically 2-2.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Anon

    Wasn’t Kennedy planning to make groups like AIPAC register as foreign agencies shortly before a lone nutjob made some amazing shots and was subsequently forever-silenced by a Zionist mobster who confessed to his rabbi that he was afraid that if the truth got out it would result in the ultimate Holocaust of his people shortly before he died conveniently in jail?

    • Agree: bombthe3gorgesdam
    • Replies: @Pixo
    @JimDandy

    That is mostly not true.

    Lobbyist registration rules are made by statute, not Presidential fiat. AIPAC is an organization of Americans who use their own time and money to support the political cause of Zionism. This activity is protected by the First Amendment. Unless Israel is funding AIPAC, there would be no reason to register as a foreign lobby.

    Israeli financing of AIPAC is implausible. US Jews provide financial support for Israel, not the other way around.

    I agree Jack Ruby was mobbed up and probably a Zionist.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Curle

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @JimDandy

    Since you mention JFK, and since the Deep State seems to be on the warpath again, I just wanted to plug Oliver Stone's four-hour documentary series on the assassination cover-up. (Personally, I never get tired of hearing about how stupid Arlen Specter's "magic bullet" theory is and how they switched out and then "lost" JFK's brain.) https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Destiny-Betrayed-Season-01/dp/B09PVNCNKR

  16. Crime doesn’t pay for the Democrats or the Streisand Effect hurts the Streisands?

  17. @anon
    Ted Kennedy almost was convicted of murder. Almost.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    Everything is wrong with this statement and your point is unclear. Kennedy surely killed Kopechne through alcohol-exacerbated negligence. He dodged any serious charge, let alone punishment, through pseudo-feudal privilege: he simply waited for his blood to clear of testable alcohol, and the police, wouldn’t you know it, were kind enough to wait with him; and top level friends of House Kennedy worked to Correct The Record in the already sympathetic newsmedia. Plus the moon landing happened at the same time so no one was watching. At no point would he have been culpable for murder. There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @J.Ross

    "Kennedy, pig that he was"

    Ted was a pig. His older brothers, whilst engaging in conduct unbecoming, were men. My favorite JFK anecdote occurs October 1962, amidst the Cuban Missile Crisis. during a moment when JFK and the Joint Chiefs believed nuclear holocaust was nigh: the President sends Jackie and the kids to their country home in Virginia. With the family away he diverts himself with a college girl in the White House, as many times as his back can take it. That's boss. Fortunately for the world, JFK and RFK did an end run around the ass-kicking but hubris engorged WW2 generals like Curtis LeMay who filled the ranks of the Joint Chiefs. The two brothers made a secret deal with Khrushchev through the Soviet ambassador. The entitled generals felt betrayed and later turned their back while Dulles, Bissell, and Angleton utilized the Otto Skorzeney network to satiate their own desire for revenge -- Bay of Pigs -- in Dallas, November 1963.

    , @HammerJack
    @J.Ross


    There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.
     
    Not even if she were pregnant? Never mind that though: more shocking by far than whatever he did or didn't do to facilitate Mary Jo's demise was the fact that instead of calling for help he went home and went to sleep. They say sleep comes easily to those with a clear conscience — or none at all.

    Even more shocking than that is that he did something vastly, immeasurably worse — to the nation.
  18. I’ve got nothing against Zionists … but they belong in Zion**

    ** not the national park.

  19. @JimDandy
    @Pixo

    Wasn't Kennedy planning to make groups like AIPAC register as foreign agencies shortly before a lone nutjob made some amazing shots and was subsequently forever-silenced by a Zionist mobster who confessed to his rabbi that he was afraid that if the truth got out it would result in the ultimate Holocaust of his people shortly before he died conveniently in jail?

    Replies: @Pixo, @Hypnotoad666

    That is mostly not true.

    Lobbyist registration rules are made by statute, not Presidential fiat. AIPAC is an organization of Americans who use their own time and money to support the political cause of Zionism. This activity is protected by the First Amendment. Unless Israel is funding AIPAC, there would be no reason to register as a foreign lobby.

    Israeli financing of AIPAC is implausible. US Jews provide financial support for Israel, not the other way around.

    I agree Jack Ruby was mobbed up and probably a Zionist.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    @Pixo

    Right, AIPAC is primarily funded by Israeli citizens who also happen to be American citizens, gotchya. And the most successful anti-First-Amendment organization in modern times should be protected by the First Amendment. That's rich. Anyway, there's nothing to agree or disagree about--Ruby was a mobbed-up Zionist, and as for what I insinuated about Kennedy... well, I'll defer here to a renowned Unz writer and former CIA officer:

    "The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was last confronted by FARA when its predecessor organization the American Zionist Council was pressured by John F. Kennedy’s Justice Department in 1962 and 1963. Kennedy’s death stopped that effort—and ended White House attempts to hold Israel accountable for the development of its secret nuclear weapons program (which depended on nuclear material removed illegally from the United States with the connivance of a company located in Pennsylvania called NUMEC)."

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/aipac-should-register-as-a-foreign-agent/

    , @Curle
    @Pixo

    Ending dual citizenship would help this, maybe. Ending lobbying on behalf of foreign countries by domestics might also help.

    Replies: @Pixo

  20. anon[218] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    Are we sure AIPAC has completely cleared out? The Israel Lobby has a 50-year winning streak of ousting Congressmen who quarrel too much with Israel.

    "Israel controls the United States Senate," J. William Fulbright told Face the Nation in 1973.
     
    13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.

    When Tucker was 10, Dick remarried to Patricia Swanson of the Swanson frozen dinner fortune; her uncle was Senator J. William Fulbright.
     
    I am sure Tucker Carlson understands the power the of the Israel Lobby better than most in Washington.

    Replies: @anon, @Pixo

    Are we sure AIPAC has completely cleared out? The Israel Lobby has a 50-year winning streak of ousting Congressmen who quarrel too much with Israel.

    Jewish supremacists have always been more concerned with Whites than about the Zionist entity. Remember what “the Jewish state” is for: its purpose is to segregate Jews from (primarily) Whites. The Zionist entity is merely a means to an end. A more effective way to deal with Whites is to eliminate them as a separate group altogether. Mass immigration and anti-Whites like Tlaib and Omar are moving the country toward that end. Jewish supremacists are therefore ambivalent about them.

  21. @Pixo
    @JimDandy

    That is mostly not true.

    Lobbyist registration rules are made by statute, not Presidential fiat. AIPAC is an organization of Americans who use their own time and money to support the political cause of Zionism. This activity is protected by the First Amendment. Unless Israel is funding AIPAC, there would be no reason to register as a foreign lobby.

    Israeli financing of AIPAC is implausible. US Jews provide financial support for Israel, not the other way around.

    I agree Jack Ruby was mobbed up and probably a Zionist.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Curle

    Right, AIPAC is primarily funded by Israeli citizens who also happen to be American citizens, gotchya. And the most successful anti-First-Amendment organization in modern times should be protected by the First Amendment. That’s rich. Anyway, there’s nothing to agree or disagree about–Ruby was a mobbed-up Zionist, and as for what I insinuated about Kennedy… well, I’ll defer here to a renowned Unz writer and former CIA officer:

    “The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was last confronted by FARA when its predecessor organization the American Zionist Council was pressured by John F. Kennedy’s Justice Department in 1962 and 1963. Kennedy’s death stopped that effort—and ended White House attempts to hold Israel accountable for the development of its secret nuclear weapons program (which depended on nuclear material removed illegally from the United States with the connivance of a company located in Pennsylvania called NUMEC).”

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/aipac-should-register-as-a-foreign-agent/

  22. @anonymous
    Are we sure AIPAC has completely cleared out? The Israel Lobby has a 50-year winning streak of ousting Congressmen who quarrel too much with Israel.

    "Israel controls the United States Senate," J. William Fulbright told Face the Nation in 1973.
     
    13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.

    When Tucker was 10, Dick remarried to Patricia Swanson of the Swanson frozen dinner fortune; her uncle was Senator J. William Fulbright.
     
    I am sure Tucker Carlson understands the power the of the Israel Lobby better than most in Washington.

    Replies: @anon, @Pixo

    “13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.”

    He lost, by 2-1 margin, because he was an inferior politician to Dale Bumpers, and because he had evolved from a segregationist into a George McGovern type liberal. His primary loss was similar to liberal Democrat incumbent Ralph Yarborough’s six years earlier in Texas to centrist Lloyd Bentson.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    @Pixo

    Haha! And what happened to Chuck Percy? I'm looking forward to hearing this.

    , @International Jew
    @Pixo

    It appears @anonymous is no Fulbright scholar.

    , @Paleo Liberal
    @Pixo

    I was in Arkansas at the time and involved in Arkansas politics at a low level. I personally knew some of Fulbright’s and Bumpers’ biggest supporters.

    You are partly right, and partly wrong.

    Bumpers was a far better candidate than Fulbright. He was probably the best governor Arkansas ever bad. He was probably a better senator. Even Fulbright’s 1974 campaign manager now believes Bumpers to be the superior senator.

    The vote for Bumpers was not anti integration. While Fulbright downplayed his segregationist past by 1974, Bumpers had been a full fledged integrationist since 1954. In 1954 Bumpers was a brand new school board member in Charleston, Arkansas, and the only attorney on the school board. The board held a secret meeting whereby Bumpers convinced the other board members to secretly integrate the schools. Meaning all the black families in town were told their new schools and were asked not to tell their white employers. First day of school the schools are integrated.

  23. @Pixo
    @anonymous

    “13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.”

    He lost, by 2-1 margin, because he was an inferior politician to Dale Bumpers, and because he had evolved from a segregationist into a George McGovern type liberal. His primary loss was similar to liberal Democrat incumbent Ralph Yarborough’s six years earlier in Texas to centrist Lloyd Bentson.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @International Jew, @Paleo Liberal

    Haha! And what happened to Chuck Percy? I’m looking forward to hearing this.

  24. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    @JimB

    Looking forward to it!

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @JimB



    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.
     
    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.
     
    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/06/14/arts/14gone-wind4/14gone-wind4-superJumbo-v2.jpg

    Replies: @JimB

  25. @Moral Stone
    Also the total number of votes was much lower in the off-season election. 110k vs 170k. That could have an effect. It’s possible the marginal voters who can get turned out (or farmed) in a presidential year break heavily to Ilhan.

    Replies: @hhsiii, @Servant of Gla'aki

    She got fewer votes than her last opponent got. I guess it was easier to rock the vote during peak COVID.

    • Replies: @Barnard
    @hhsiii

    Her opponent claimed several Somali community leaders endorsed him. Perhaps they were less likely to hand over absentee ballots to be cast on her behalf this time around.

  26. @Pixo
    @anonymous

    “13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.”

    He lost, by 2-1 margin, because he was an inferior politician to Dale Bumpers, and because he had evolved from a segregationist into a George McGovern type liberal. His primary loss was similar to liberal Democrat incumbent Ralph Yarborough’s six years earlier in Texas to centrist Lloyd Bentson.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @International Jew, @Paleo Liberal

    It appears ymous is no Fulbright scholar.

  27. @JimDandy
    @Pixo

    Wasn't Kennedy planning to make groups like AIPAC register as foreign agencies shortly before a lone nutjob made some amazing shots and was subsequently forever-silenced by a Zionist mobster who confessed to his rabbi that he was afraid that if the truth got out it would result in the ultimate Holocaust of his people shortly before he died conveniently in jail?

    Replies: @Pixo, @Hypnotoad666

    Since you mention JFK, and since the Deep State seems to be on the warpath again, I just wanted to plug Oliver Stone’s four-hour documentary series on the assassination cover-up. (Personally, I never get tired of hearing about how stupid Arlen Specter’s “magic bullet” theory is and how they switched out and then “lost” JFK’s brain.) https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Destiny-Betrayed-Season-01/dp/B09PVNCNKR

    • Thanks: JimDandy
  28. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    I very much hope that you are right, but whites are also demoralized and internally divided. White identitarianism is considered white supremacy and will be hit with the hardest possible legal sanctions. I see no bright future for a white plurality or minority in the United States.

    • Agree: 36 ulster
  29. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

  30. @Hypnotoad666
    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats. Stop the presses!

    Replies: @AndrewR, @11B4P, @Hibernian

    Calling Omar a “black Democrat” like she’s Al Sharpton is very odd, but go off.

  31. @Buzz Mohawk
    While it is heartening to see the likes of Ilhan Omar take a shot across the bow, it is also satisfying to watch her and the few others in her camp get a few shots of their own in against those who have far too much influence over our government.

    Such is the pathetic perspective allowed to a White man in America today.

    I risk the ire of my Jewish friends here for saying this, but I am getting a little kick out of watching corrupt Muslims take public shots at what amounts to the Zionist Powers That Be in my ancestors' country.

    Those ancestors left this country to me, to their Posterity (a word they capitalized in the Constitution they wrote.) But this is not my country anymore, when a "bureau" that is not even in the Constitution can raid a former president's home on vague legal technicalities for obvious political purposes and intimidation.

    No, the Ilman Omars and the Zionists they envy can take this place and shove it.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIjEauGiRLo

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    The question Whether one generation of men has a right to bind another, seems never to have been started either on this or our side of the water… (But) between society and society, or generation and generation there is no municipal obligation, no umpire but the law of nature. We seem not to have perceived that, by the law of nature, one generation is to another as one independant nation to another… On similar ground it may be proved that no society can make a perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law. The earth belongs always to the living generation… Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of 19. years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force and not of right.

    Guess who wrote this, buddy.

  32. @Hypnotoad666
    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats. Stop the presses!

    Replies: @AndrewR, @11B4P, @Hibernian

    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats.

    The District is 63.6% White and only 16.6% Black. Its Minnesotas 5th congressional district.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @11B4P

    Ain't you heard of the 5/3rds law?

  33. Crime has paid for the Democrats. They organized and funded nationwide riots in 2020 to get Trump out of office, and they did.

    • Agree: rebel yell
  34. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    I hope you’re right, but I’m skeptical.

  35. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    Not quite the dynamic I see.

    Half of Whites are happy to give away their heritage for either 30 pieces of silver, or some status among the non-Whites.

    This will continue until the money is gone, or the Givers are shut down by the Doers.

  36. Did AIPAC go after Levin in Michigan as cover for going after black candidates? Driving Jewish candidates out of congress seems like a shortsighted victory.

    • Agree: HammerJack
  37. OT It turns out that the specific Sesame Steeet character represented by the theme park employee who failed to violate park rules for the two black kids was Rosita, originally a fruit bat and consistently bilingual (apparently the two Hispanic human characters I remember on Sesame Street don’t count as first bilinguals), and in response to the hilariously spurious twenty-five million dollar lawsuit, the park has removed all traces of Rosita (from signage, brochures, etc, let alone the walkabout costume).
    It sure would be awful if somebody explained that to the kids and then told them that their mom killed Rosita.

  38. Fun Fact: In 2000 Omar dumped her Somali hubby for a white guy. He might be what annoyed her base of support. I wonder if the Rs have a plan to take her out, probably not.

    3. Mynett Has Served as an Aide & Strategist for a Number of Progressive Politicians
    https://heavy.com/news/2019/08/tim-mynett/

  39. Come the day of the rope the sacarens will be dealt with also…

  40. @Hypnotoad666
    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats. Stop the presses!

    Replies: @AndrewR, @11B4P, @Hibernian

    He’s marginally less Leftist than she is. Also a major embarrassment to American society would have been removed from the House if he had won.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    @Hibernian


    a major embarrassment to American society

     

    Not a big deal when one considers that the American society is a great embarrassment to humanity itself.
  41. @Whereismyhandle
    OT:

    If you will it, it is no dream. Internet trad caths are real and influencing culture.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/08/09/opinion/nyc-catholicism-dimes-square-religion.amp.html


    Nobody young and smart is a libtard. It's been exhausted and found wanting, to put it mildly. Reddit atheism is literally a meme that's mocked just by describing it as such.

    Replies: @ADL Pyramid of Hate

    Senior editor at First Things brags about how Catholicism is the religion of Oscar Wilde, Honor Levy, BDSM exhibits at the Met, literally “perverts,” and not demanding “authentic internal conversion.” With trads like these, who needs libtards?

    • Agree: IreneAthena
  42. @Pixo
    @JimDandy

    That is mostly not true.

    Lobbyist registration rules are made by statute, not Presidential fiat. AIPAC is an organization of Americans who use their own time and money to support the political cause of Zionism. This activity is protected by the First Amendment. Unless Israel is funding AIPAC, there would be no reason to register as a foreign lobby.

    Israeli financing of AIPAC is implausible. US Jews provide financial support for Israel, not the other way around.

    I agree Jack Ruby was mobbed up and probably a Zionist.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Curle

    Ending dual citizenship would help this, maybe. Ending lobbying on behalf of foreign countries by domestics might also help.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Curle

    I agree dual citizenship should be prohibited. Lobbying “on behalf of foreign countries by domestics” can be regulated in that foreign funding can be prohibited. Foreigners aren’t protected by the First Amendment. However, if US citizens want to advocate and organize for Israel, that’s their right.

    The foreign government that spends the most on US lobbying is Qatar, which is wise to do so because it obscenely rich and vulnerable.

  43. @hhsiii
    @Moral Stone

    She got fewer votes than her last opponent got. I guess it was easier to rock the vote during peak COVID.

    Replies: @Barnard

    Her opponent claimed several Somali community leaders endorsed him. Perhaps they were less likely to hand over absentee ballots to be cast on her behalf this time around.

  44. @Pixo
    @anonymous

    “13 months later Fulbright lost the Democratic primary and established a precedent.”

    He lost, by 2-1 margin, because he was an inferior politician to Dale Bumpers, and because he had evolved from a segregationist into a George McGovern type liberal. His primary loss was similar to liberal Democrat incumbent Ralph Yarborough’s six years earlier in Texas to centrist Lloyd Bentson.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @International Jew, @Paleo Liberal

    I was in Arkansas at the time and involved in Arkansas politics at a low level. I personally knew some of Fulbright’s and Bumpers’ biggest supporters.

    You are partly right, and partly wrong.

    Bumpers was a far better candidate than Fulbright. He was probably the best governor Arkansas ever bad. He was probably a better senator. Even Fulbright’s 1974 campaign manager now believes Bumpers to be the superior senator.

    The vote for Bumpers was not anti integration. While Fulbright downplayed his segregationist past by 1974, Bumpers had been a full fledged integrationist since 1954. In 1954 Bumpers was a brand new school board member in Charleston, Arkansas, and the only attorney on the school board. The board held a secret meeting whereby Bumpers convinced the other board members to secretly integrate the schools. Meaning all the black families in town were told their new schools and were asked not to tell their white employers. First day of school the schools are integrated.

    • Thanks: Pixo
  45. OT Russian hacker group “killnet” publishes personal data of America’s best weapons engineers, associated with HIMARS. Wait a minute. America’s best engineers. Won’t that get Russia in trouble with their ally China?
    https://www.sb.by/en/russian-killnet-hackers-posted-data-of-himars-employees-.html

  46. Though she got dressed down by Pelosi, AIPAC have run afoul of Bari Weiss’ nightmare. Following the casual murder of prominent Palestinian journalist, and US citizen, Shireen Abu Aqleh by an Israeli soldier AIPAC’s attempts to cover for Israel were just a little much. It made a lot of Dems be put into uncomfortable positions.

    It looks like this was used as the breakaway point for a lot of Dems.

    De Blasio, for instance has thrown shade at AIPAC for openly doing this, bazooka’ing a load of money at whomever opposes Dems who sympathise with the Palestinians which has become more common since Floyd and BLM has meant radical black candidates are pushed forward. No matter the cost to the Democrats in the final elections or in terms of sowing serious internal discord.

    This has meant increasingly the Dems are caught between two minority lobbies both of whom they have surrendered totally moral authority to. This is what Bari Weiss really resigned about. She is scared that Jewish moral superiority so effective against white American gentiles since the mid century doesn’t trump black moral superiority and that to blacks they’re just rich whites who support Zionism. If the supposed moral paradigm of American Jews is actually taken seriously then how can Israel be defended? How can the things it does be defended? And wokeness has simply accelerated the logic of this moral paradigm.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/17/pro-israel-lobby-defeat-democrats-palestinians-2022

    Even the Guardian, which post Iraq and expanding to the US has become very neocon is talking about this.

    Of course, most probably AIPAC will be undermined but some new more friendly version of it will replace it. But it won’t solve Bari Weiss’ nightmare.

  47. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    We’ll see. If the IQ-worshipping, individual-uber-alles commenters around here are any indication, whites will never pull together.

    Thankfully, the commenters around here are distinctly not normal – though in their isolated neighborhoods, it can feel that way.

    Even a small percentage of whites embracing group identity could be a serious force to be reckoned with. And, more importantly, an attractive alternative to fence-sitting whites.

    Despite the protests around here, colorblind civic nationalism is rapidly losing its appeal among average whites. The crew around here is protected by their academic abilities which allow them to avoid almost all of the current hate Whitey policies.

    However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ – Jews. They’re desperate to keep whites on the colorblind CivNat plantation.

    (Ever notice how Jack D, the ultimate Zionist, and the rest of the Jew crew are so adamant about whites sticking with the colorblind civic nationalism plan.)

    They know who is their real competition, and they’ll fight hard to keep them out of the ring.

    Now, why Sailer is king of the colorblind CivNats is more of a mystery. Could be his nature, could be the time he was brought up, or it could be something much more personal. Who knows.

    But it’s something very important because he’s willing to write piece that make him seem, shall we say, not very astute. And if nothing IQ-worshiupers hate more than to look stupid.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Whites are able to instantly shed their commitment to colorblindness when shopping for real estate.

    They simply can't help themselves. They will end up dominating any plausible rules based system. And blacks will go along with it, because that's what they do.

    Whites can live with a bit of hypocrisy. It is tacky to be too candid about race. Especially when we have proxy's like credit scores.

    , @Jack D
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    You and "Loyalty Over IQ Worship" pose a false choice - you can either have loyalty/white nationalism OR you can have IQ. If you two had larned that Spanish lingo, I would ask you, "¿Porque no los dos?"

    By identifying with stupidity, you do your cause no favor. No one wants to join the stupid party. This is an old problem for the right. The old German Social Democrats used to say that Anti-Semitism was the socialism of fools.

    OTOH, Leo Strauss argued that Stalin considered that the "socialism of fools" was a good thing because fools are common, so he deliberately cultivated Anti-Semitism as a means of gaining popularity. However, I have too much respect for the intelligence of the American people to think that would work here on any large scale.

    The circle that Steve and some others here seeks to square is a non-anti-white party that would be appealing to patriotic intelligent people and not just to fools.

    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows - blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc. Yes, it's a circular firing squad but as long as the deplorable white man is in the middle it all holds together (this BTW is why the Democrats NEED Trump even more than the Republicans do. He is the personification of the evil white man, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the Left.) Some people here, like Another Dad, seem to be more interested in who CANNOT belong to their party/country than who can. By the time some people here are done excluding everyone from their club, there are maybe 3 people left in America who would qualify, especially if you add being stupid to the list of qualifications. This is not a recipe for taking power.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    , @Pixo
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “ However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ – Jews. ”

    Your insurmountable problem is that American white people really like Jews, and the more intelligent, wealthy, powerful, sociable, and generally effective they are, the more philosemitic they are.

    Now you may see this as a result of fear and bribery. And it is certainly true Jews are rich and tend to ruthlessly crush their domestic enemies. But they didn’t get to become rich and powerful without having many qualities Americans admire.

    Replies: @Fungus Among Us

  48. How about her marrying her brother ,committing immigration fraud…….all of her crimes against islam…..what’s the punishment mullahs?

  49. @Buzz Mohawk
    While it is heartening to see the likes of Ilhan Omar take a shot across the bow, it is also satisfying to watch her and the few others in her camp get a few shots of their own in against those who have far too much influence over our government.

    Such is the pathetic perspective allowed to a White man in America today.

    I risk the ire of my Jewish friends here for saying this, but I am getting a little kick out of watching corrupt Muslims take public shots at what amounts to the Zionist Powers That Be in my ancestors' country.

    Those ancestors left this country to me, to their Posterity (a word they capitalized in the Constitution they wrote.) But this is not my country anymore, when a "bureau" that is not even in the Constitution can raid a former president's home on vague legal technicalities for obvious political purposes and intimidation.

    No, the Ilman Omars and the Zionists they envy can take this place and shove it.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIjEauGiRLo

    Replies: @AndrewR, @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Omar is extremely useful to my cause and a pain in the ass to the Jews. I wish her well.

    • Agree: Bill Jones
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    "my cause"

    A strategic lad could look at Islam as an ally against the powerful Judaic heretical cult that conjured the globohomo sickness that plagues the lands of the West. I'm not down with veiling and chattelizing the womens. However, I can look past a few irregularities to further my cause: A life without pants.

  50. @Hibernian
    @Hypnotoad666

    He's marginally less Leftist than she is. Also a major embarrassment to American society would have been removed from the House if he had won.

    Replies: @anonymous

    a major embarrassment to American society

    Not a big deal when one considers that the American society is a great embarrassment to humanity itself.

  51. @Curle
    @Pixo

    Ending dual citizenship would help this, maybe. Ending lobbying on behalf of foreign countries by domestics might also help.

    Replies: @Pixo

    I agree dual citizenship should be prohibited. Lobbying “on behalf of foreign countries by domestics” can be regulated in that foreign funding can be prohibited. Foreigners aren’t protected by the First Amendment. However, if US citizens want to advocate and organize for Israel, that’s their right.

    The foreign government that spends the most on US lobbying is Qatar, which is wise to do so because it obscenely rich and vulnerable.

  52. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    First, cull the rats.

  53. “It’s almost as if crime doesn’t pay for the Democrats.”

    Yes, I’m sure Hillary, Hunter and their ilk congratulate themselves daily on disaster narrowly averted.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
  54. @Kylie
    "It’s almost as if crime doesn’t pay for the Democrats."

    Yes, I'm sure Hillary, Hunter and their ilk congratulate themselves daily on disaster narrowly averted.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    • LOL: Kylie
  55. That’s less than 2500 votes. I’m sure a box of absentee ballots just showed up at 4am

  56. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pixo
    AIPAC also failed to knock off Squaddie Rashida Tlalib with Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey. Not sure if she’s related to Oprah, but the name made clear that she was black but black voters went with the Pali.

    Detroit now has no black congressmen for the first time since 1956, since a Hindu techbro just spent $6 million winning the other Detroit black seat.

    AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. So they are basically 2-2.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Anon

    [[AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. ]]

    Don’t be a fool. Both Omar and Tlalib are under Jewish mafia control. The AIPAC needs slaves to support the bills against Iran that come to the whore houses, the congress and senate, to pass. Check for yourself to see that these ‘black progressives’, Omar, Cori Bush and Tlalib, have voted YES for every single bill AGAINST Iran written by the traitor zionists ‘representatives’ to satisfy their masters, the Jewish mafia. Why does AIPAC want to remove its slaves who are under control?
    Today, 75% of the slaves who are selected by the Jewish money to go to congress, senate or other center of power are BLACKS. No one has respect for these zionist black slaves anymore who are ready to kiss the Jewish mafia’s behind. This is NOT democracy only hypocrisy. Only fools are voting.

    The ‘timesofIsrael’ reproted:

    [A new super PAC led by “Black and Jewish” leaders has endorsed five Black Democrats who have positions that are friendly to AIPAC, the latest sign that pro-Israel donors are determined to stem erosion of support for Israel among African Americans.]

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    • Replies: @Evocatus
    @Anon


    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland
     
    Somewhat OT but I think Torres will be pushed by the Democrat kingmakers as the next NYC mayor. They are dissatisfied with Eric Adams, who has proven himself to be an incompetent bloviating ass when it comes to reducing crime, and they will likely try to head off any challenge from the Dem Socialists to nominate someone from the AOC wing of the party. Torres ticks all their boxes; homosexual, half black & half Puerto Rican, pro Israel, genteel, not an 80s throwback like Adams, and sufficiently woke for the mainstream Dems while still controllable. In short, a perfect puppet for the big machers in NYC. Plus, his new district now includes heavily Jewish Riverdale as well as the South Bronx. If Adams goes down, expect to see a Torres vs Jumaane Williams matchup, with Williams being the favored candidate of the DSA types and Torres being backed by (secular) Jewish establishment liberals. Unfortunately, no Giuliani or Bloomberg will get elected here again, since too many white Catholics have left the city.

    Replies: @Anon

    , @Pixo
    @Anon

    You reminded me that Nina Turner is another AIPAC scalp. It was a special election last year to replace Marcia Fudge in a Cleveland area discount.

    Turner was a Bernie staffer and identified as a socialist radical, Brown was a more typical urban liberal politician.

    , @Charon
    @Anon

    Thanks. Good information. It probably won't take quite as much time or money as it did to brainwash white people, but at least this does indicate that black people have finally arrived, politically speaking. They're finally important enough to be co-opted.

  57. OT NPR takes a break from contracting monkeypox, eating the flesh of children, and worshipping Satan to remind us that it’s becoming the anniversary of an innocent man, whose car was attacked by rifle-wielding anti-Constitution extremists, driving past a massively unhealthy and overweight cigarette addict who subsequently had a heart attack and died, for which the attack victim was blamed. As a result of cowardly Quisling boomers rushing to sound reasonable, more such crucifixions of innocent people followed. At no time did any “reasonable” person suggest that pointing Armalite pattern rifles at a moving car while blocking the road was a dumb idea. Every atrocity of the left is made possible by your tolerance of a previous atrocity. The teardrops of Akhmatova and Mandelstam are only liquid from one point of view; from another, they’re quite solid, they travel the opposite way, point first, and they sail effortlessly through the air, more powerfully than any Dodge Charger, and they return to their source like a speeding homesick black Arabian horse, which source is the heart of tyrannical bureaucrats.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottesville_car_attack

  58. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    Whites on the left won’t be part of a “cohesive group”. They’ll simply split into factions of oppressed minorities they prefer to other “racist” Caucasians.

  59. @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    Non-Whites don't actually get along with each other. As time goes on, the single largest, most cohesive group will be Whites. They'll have plenty of assets, IQ and morale on their side.

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    Replies: @JimB, @Diversity Heretic, @AndrewR, @Jack P, @bomag, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Currahee, @Seaman, @Truth

    You might want to start practicing, here.

  60. @Patrick in SC
    The fact that she could be elected to any district in America, let alone one in Minnesota…

    Replies: @Kylie

    “The fact that she could be elected to any district in America, let alone one in Minnesota…”

    The fact that she could be in America, let alone Minnesota…

  61. @JimB
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship


    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.
     
    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Reg Cæsar

    Looking forward to it!

  62. anon[118] • Disclaimer says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    We'll see. If the IQ-worshipping, individual-uber-alles commenters around here are any indication, whites will never pull together.

    Thankfully, the commenters around here are distinctly not normal - though in their isolated neighborhoods, it can feel that way.

    Even a small percentage of whites embracing group identity could be a serious force to be reckoned with. And, more importantly, an attractive alternative to fence-sitting whites.

    Despite the protests around here, colorblind civic nationalism is rapidly losing its appeal among average whites. The crew around here is protected by their academic abilities which allow them to avoid almost all of the current hate Whitey policies.

    However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ - Jews. They're desperate to keep whites on the colorblind CivNat plantation.

    (Ever notice how Jack D, the ultimate Zionist, and the rest of the Jew crew are so adamant about whites sticking with the colorblind civic nationalism plan.)

    They know who is their real competition, and they'll fight hard to keep them out of the ring.

    Now, why Sailer is king of the colorblind CivNats is more of a mystery. Could be his nature, could be the time he was brought up, or it could be something much more personal. Who knows.

    But it's something very important because he's willing to write piece that make him seem, shall we say, not very astute. And if nothing IQ-worshiupers hate more than to look stupid.

    Replies: @anon, @Jack D, @Pixo

    Whites are able to instantly shed their commitment to colorblindness when shopping for real estate.

    They simply can’t help themselves. They will end up dominating any plausible rules based system. And blacks will go along with it, because that’s what they do.

    Whites can live with a bit of hypocrisy. It is tacky to be too candid about race. Especially when we have proxy’s like credit scores.

  63. @J.Ross
    @anon

    Everything is wrong with this statement and your point is unclear. Kennedy surely killed Kopechne through alcohol-exacerbated negligence. He dodged any serious charge, let alone punishment, through pseudo-feudal privilege: he simply waited for his blood to clear of testable alcohol, and the police, wouldn't you know it, were kind enough to wait with him; and top level friends of House Kennedy worked to Correct The Record in the already sympathetic newsmedia. Plus the moon landing happened at the same time so no one was watching. At no point would he have been culpable for murder. There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @HammerJack

    “Kennedy, pig that he was”

    Ted was a pig. His older brothers, whilst engaging in conduct unbecoming, were men. My favorite JFK anecdote occurs October 1962, amidst the Cuban Missile Crisis. during a moment when JFK and the Joint Chiefs believed nuclear holocaust was nigh: the President sends Jackie and the kids to their country home in Virginia. With the family away he diverts himself with a college girl in the White House, as many times as his back can take it. That’s boss. Fortunately for the world, JFK and RFK did an end run around the ass-kicking but hubris engorged WW2 generals like Curtis LeMay who filled the ranks of the Joint Chiefs. The two brothers made a secret deal with Khrushchev through the Soviet ambassador. The entitled generals felt betrayed and later turned their back while Dulles, Bissell, and Angleton utilized the Otto Skorzeney network to satiate their own desire for revenge — Bay of Pigs — in Dallas, November 1963.

  64. Unpopular opinion: I love Ilhan Omar, if for no other reason than for how she triggers kosher conservatives.

    • Replies: @but an humble craftsman
    @Ian Smith

    I couldn't agree more.

  65. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Omar is extremely useful to my cause and a pain in the ass to the Jews. I wish her well.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    “my cause”

    A strategic lad could look at Islam as an ally against the powerful Judaic heretical cult that conjured the globohomo sickness that plagues the lands of the West. I’m not down with veiling and chattelizing the womens. However, I can look past a few irregularities to further my cause: A life without pants.

  66. @Anon
    @Pixo

    [[AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. ]]


    Don't be a fool. Both Omar and Tlalib are under Jewish mafia control. The AIPAC needs slaves to support the bills against Iran that come to the whore houses, the congress and senate, to pass. Check for yourself to see that these 'black progressives', Omar, Cori Bush and Tlalib, have voted YES for every single bill AGAINST Iran written by the traitor zionists 'representatives' to satisfy their masters, the Jewish mafia. Why does AIPAC want to remove its slaves who are under control?
    Today, 75% of the slaves who are selected by the Jewish money to go to congress, senate or other center of power are BLACKS. No one has respect for these zionist black slaves anymore who are ready to kiss the Jewish mafia's behind. This is NOT democracy only hypocrisy. Only fools are voting.

    The 'timesofIsrael' reproted:

    [A new super PAC led by “Black and Jewish” leaders has endorsed five Black Democrats who have positions that are friendly to AIPAC, the latest sign that pro-Israel donors are determined to stem erosion of support for Israel among African Americans.]

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    https://forward.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shontel-brown-gotv.jpg

    Replies: @Evocatus, @Pixo, @Charon

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    Somewhat OT but I think Torres will be pushed by the Democrat kingmakers as the next NYC mayor. They are dissatisfied with Eric Adams, who has proven himself to be an incompetent bloviating ass when it comes to reducing crime, and they will likely try to head off any challenge from the Dem Socialists to nominate someone from the AOC wing of the party. Torres ticks all their boxes; homosexual, half black & half Puerto Rican, pro Israel, genteel, not an 80s throwback like Adams, and sufficiently woke for the mainstream Dems while still controllable. In short, a perfect puppet for the big machers in NYC. Plus, his new district now includes heavily Jewish Riverdale as well as the South Bronx. If Adams goes down, expect to see a Torres vs Jumaane Williams matchup, with Williams being the favored candidate of the DSA types and Torres being backed by (secular) Jewish establishment liberals. Unfortunately, no Giuliani or Bloomberg will get elected here again, since too many white Catholics have left the city.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Evocatus

    Thank you for your post. I did not know all these information you offered. Frankly, I do not follow any election anymore, so I can stay calm. Apparently, some of the Blacks are angry with these pro Israel servants as well:

    still an introvert
    @SayeJoseph23
    ·
    Jun 26, 2020
    I feel like Black people, Black mothers told y’all he was no good. It’s been 2 seconds since he won the primary and he already on his progressive pro-Israel bs
    Why did folks endorse and go so hard for him?!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1276660045057601537

  67. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    We'll see. If the IQ-worshipping, individual-uber-alles commenters around here are any indication, whites will never pull together.

    Thankfully, the commenters around here are distinctly not normal - though in their isolated neighborhoods, it can feel that way.

    Even a small percentage of whites embracing group identity could be a serious force to be reckoned with. And, more importantly, an attractive alternative to fence-sitting whites.

    Despite the protests around here, colorblind civic nationalism is rapidly losing its appeal among average whites. The crew around here is protected by their academic abilities which allow them to avoid almost all of the current hate Whitey policies.

    However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ - Jews. They're desperate to keep whites on the colorblind CivNat plantation.

    (Ever notice how Jack D, the ultimate Zionist, and the rest of the Jew crew are so adamant about whites sticking with the colorblind civic nationalism plan.)

    They know who is their real competition, and they'll fight hard to keep them out of the ring.

    Now, why Sailer is king of the colorblind CivNats is more of a mystery. Could be his nature, could be the time he was brought up, or it could be something much more personal. Who knows.

    But it's something very important because he's willing to write piece that make him seem, shall we say, not very astute. And if nothing IQ-worshiupers hate more than to look stupid.

    Replies: @anon, @Jack D, @Pixo

    You and “Loyalty Over IQ Worship” pose a false choice – you can either have loyalty/white nationalism OR you can have IQ. If you two had larned that Spanish lingo, I would ask you, “¿Porque no los dos?”

    By identifying with stupidity, you do your cause no favor. No one wants to join the stupid party. This is an old problem for the right. The old German Social Democrats used to say that Anti-Semitism was the socialism of fools.

    OTOH, Leo Strauss argued that Stalin considered that the “socialism of fools” was a good thing because fools are common, so he deliberately cultivated Anti-Semitism as a means of gaining popularity. However, I have too much respect for the intelligence of the American people to think that would work here on any large scale.

    The circle that Steve and some others here seeks to square is a non-anti-white party that would be appealing to patriotic intelligent people and not just to fools.

    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows – blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc. Yes, it’s a circular firing squad but as long as the deplorable white man is in the middle it all holds together (this BTW is why the Democrats NEED Trump even more than the Republicans do. He is the personification of the evil white man, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the Left.) Some people here, like Another Dad, seem to be more interested in who CANNOT belong to their party/country than who can. By the time some people here are done excluding everyone from their club, there are maybe 3 people left in America who would qualify, especially if you add being stupid to the list of qualifications. This is not a recipe for taking power.

    • Disagree: Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    • Thanks: 36 ulster
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jack D


    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows – blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc.
     
    And they all get to retain their identity and be proud of it. So why not the same for whites?

    Why can’t whites promote their interests and while allying with others?
    , @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    @Jack D

    I never posed such a choice, that's your reframing of the issue. Nobody would ever say you can either have smart people or you can have white people, but not both. LOL

    It's not a matter of "identifying with stupidity" either, which is another false way of framing the issue. If someone is loyal to England or Japan or whatever nation you pick, then they do have a loyalty to that that nation. They may respect someone of high intelligence and good character from another nation, but they don't try to form some international "high IQ" club that has first dibs on their loyalty.

    You are the one putting forward false dichotomies.

  68. Group identities are forged and hardened in conflicts with other groups. The centuries-long frontier wars of American settlers with Indians created the American people. Americans were over-whelmingly white and culturally English/Protestant, but the identity was American and came from countless encounters facing howling Indians outside the cabin door.
    Americans haven’t had that kind of opposition to power up their group cohesion in many generations. Many others with no social, cultural, or familial ties to that history have immigrated here and further watered-down that original group cohesion.
    Minority groups in this country – blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists – maintain their group identities based on opposition to Americans. Much of that opposition is ideological ranting and won’t hold them together in hard times.
    There’s not going to be a White identity in this country that will ever attract many white people. I don’t think there will be a resurrected American identity either – that day is over.
    But don’t think that all the hillbillies and gentiles in fly-over land are fading away, or too fat and stupid to ever assert themselves. Many millions of former Americans are angry at their “former” status, as they should be. The groups who hate us are pushing us hard. I don’t know what our name will be called, but “we” will eventually push back.

    • Replies: @anon
    @rebel yell


    Americans haven’t had that kind of opposition to power up their group cohesion in many generations.
     
    Jews “power up” their group cohesion by forming and promoting narratives of ethnic conflict with outsiders. (The “holocaust” story, etc.) In some cases their antagonism of other groups (theft of Palestine, for example) produces real conflict that serves to foment cohesion. The trick is to keep the conflicts just warm enough to stimulate cohesion.
  69. @Moral Stone
    Also the total number of votes was much lower in the off-season election. 110k vs 170k. That could have an effect. It’s possible the marginal voters who can get turned out (or farmed) in a presidential year break heavily to Ilhan.

    Replies: @hhsiii, @Servant of Gla'aki

    Also the total number of votes was much lower in the off-season election.

    Yes, but there’s still about a 15 percent decline, as compared to the 2018 (midterm) numbers.

  70. Anon[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @Evocatus
    @Anon


    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland
     
    Somewhat OT but I think Torres will be pushed by the Democrat kingmakers as the next NYC mayor. They are dissatisfied with Eric Adams, who has proven himself to be an incompetent bloviating ass when it comes to reducing crime, and they will likely try to head off any challenge from the Dem Socialists to nominate someone from the AOC wing of the party. Torres ticks all their boxes; homosexual, half black & half Puerto Rican, pro Israel, genteel, not an 80s throwback like Adams, and sufficiently woke for the mainstream Dems while still controllable. In short, a perfect puppet for the big machers in NYC. Plus, his new district now includes heavily Jewish Riverdale as well as the South Bronx. If Adams goes down, expect to see a Torres vs Jumaane Williams matchup, with Williams being the favored candidate of the DSA types and Torres being backed by (secular) Jewish establishment liberals. Unfortunately, no Giuliani or Bloomberg will get elected here again, since too many white Catholics have left the city.

    Replies: @Anon

    Thank you for your post. I did not know all these information you offered. Frankly, I do not follow any election anymore, so I can stay calm. Apparently, some of the Blacks are angry with these pro Israel servants as well:

    still an introvert
    @SayeJoseph23
    ·
    Jun 26, 2020
    I feel like Black people, Black mothers told y’all he was no good. It’s been 2 seconds since he won the primary and he already on his progressive pro-Israel bs
    Why did folks endorse and go so hard for him?!!

  71. @Anon
    @Pixo

    [[AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. ]]


    Don't be a fool. Both Omar and Tlalib are under Jewish mafia control. The AIPAC needs slaves to support the bills against Iran that come to the whore houses, the congress and senate, to pass. Check for yourself to see that these 'black progressives', Omar, Cori Bush and Tlalib, have voted YES for every single bill AGAINST Iran written by the traitor zionists 'representatives' to satisfy their masters, the Jewish mafia. Why does AIPAC want to remove its slaves who are under control?
    Today, 75% of the slaves who are selected by the Jewish money to go to congress, senate or other center of power are BLACKS. No one has respect for these zionist black slaves anymore who are ready to kiss the Jewish mafia's behind. This is NOT democracy only hypocrisy. Only fools are voting.

    The 'timesofIsrael' reproted:

    [A new super PAC led by “Black and Jewish” leaders has endorsed five Black Democrats who have positions that are friendly to AIPAC, the latest sign that pro-Israel donors are determined to stem erosion of support for Israel among African Americans.]

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    https://forward.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shontel-brown-gotv.jpg

    Replies: @Evocatus, @Pixo, @Charon

    You reminded me that Nina Turner is another AIPAC scalp. It was a special election last year to replace Marcia Fudge in a Cleveland area discount.

    Turner was a Bernie staffer and identified as a socialist radical, Brown was a more typical urban liberal politician.

  72. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    We'll see. If the IQ-worshipping, individual-uber-alles commenters around here are any indication, whites will never pull together.

    Thankfully, the commenters around here are distinctly not normal - though in their isolated neighborhoods, it can feel that way.

    Even a small percentage of whites embracing group identity could be a serious force to be reckoned with. And, more importantly, an attractive alternative to fence-sitting whites.

    Despite the protests around here, colorblind civic nationalism is rapidly losing its appeal among average whites. The crew around here is protected by their academic abilities which allow them to avoid almost all of the current hate Whitey policies.

    However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ - Jews. They're desperate to keep whites on the colorblind CivNat plantation.

    (Ever notice how Jack D, the ultimate Zionist, and the rest of the Jew crew are so adamant about whites sticking with the colorblind civic nationalism plan.)

    They know who is their real competition, and they'll fight hard to keep them out of the ring.

    Now, why Sailer is king of the colorblind CivNats is more of a mystery. Could be his nature, could be the time he was brought up, or it could be something much more personal. Who knows.

    But it's something very important because he's willing to write piece that make him seem, shall we say, not very astute. And if nothing IQ-worshiupers hate more than to look stupid.

    Replies: @anon, @Jack D, @Pixo

    “ However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ – Jews. ”

    Your insurmountable problem is that American white people really like Jews, and the more intelligent, wealthy, powerful, sociable, and generally effective they are, the more philosemitic they are.

    Now you may see this as a result of fear and bribery. And it is certainly true Jews are rich and tend to ruthlessly crush their domestic enemies. But they didn’t get to become rich and powerful without having many qualities Americans admire.

    • Replies: @Fungus Among Us
    @Pixo

    Your insurmountable problem is that you fail to distinguish between the Eastern Jews and the Western Jews- - something Jews themselves are almost always guilty of. The Goodwill that Americans feel / felt for Jews was for Western Jews. Unfortunately, the 1991 Lautenberg bill imported a whole population of Eastern Jews, the literal offspring of the Bolsheviks of Russia. These depraved monsters are the enemy of all mankind including, to a lesser extent, the Western Jews. There is no natural affinity from Americans for Victoria Nuland and her ilk.

  73. “Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu)”

    And that says it all! We should celebrate that she is still around — continuing to broadcast the true nature of the D-party.

  74. Anonymous[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    You and "Loyalty Over IQ Worship" pose a false choice - you can either have loyalty/white nationalism OR you can have IQ. If you two had larned that Spanish lingo, I would ask you, "¿Porque no los dos?"

    By identifying with stupidity, you do your cause no favor. No one wants to join the stupid party. This is an old problem for the right. The old German Social Democrats used to say that Anti-Semitism was the socialism of fools.

    OTOH, Leo Strauss argued that Stalin considered that the "socialism of fools" was a good thing because fools are common, so he deliberately cultivated Anti-Semitism as a means of gaining popularity. However, I have too much respect for the intelligence of the American people to think that would work here on any large scale.

    The circle that Steve and some others here seeks to square is a non-anti-white party that would be appealing to patriotic intelligent people and not just to fools.

    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows - blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc. Yes, it's a circular firing squad but as long as the deplorable white man is in the middle it all holds together (this BTW is why the Democrats NEED Trump even more than the Republicans do. He is the personification of the evil white man, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the Left.) Some people here, like Another Dad, seem to be more interested in who CANNOT belong to their party/country than who can. By the time some people here are done excluding everyone from their club, there are maybe 3 people left in America who would qualify, especially if you add being stupid to the list of qualifications. This is not a recipe for taking power.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows – blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc.

    And they all get to retain their identity and be proud of it. So why not the same for whites?

    Why can’t whites promote their interests and while allying with others?

  75. @JimB
    @Loyalty Over IQ Worship


    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.
     
    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @Reg Cæsar

    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.

    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.

    • Replies: @JimB
    @Reg Cæsar

    Yup!

  76. anon[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @rebel yell
    Group identities are forged and hardened in conflicts with other groups. The centuries-long frontier wars of American settlers with Indians created the American people. Americans were over-whelmingly white and culturally English/Protestant, but the identity was American and came from countless encounters facing howling Indians outside the cabin door.
    Americans haven't had that kind of opposition to power up their group cohesion in many generations. Many others with no social, cultural, or familial ties to that history have immigrated here and further watered-down that original group cohesion.
    Minority groups in this country - blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists - maintain their group identities based on opposition to Americans. Much of that opposition is ideological ranting and won't hold them together in hard times.
    There's not going to be a White identity in this country that will ever attract many white people. I don't think there will be a resurrected American identity either - that day is over.
    But don't think that all the hillbillies and gentiles in fly-over land are fading away, or too fat and stupid to ever assert themselves. Many millions of former Americans are angry at their "former" status, as they should be. The groups who hate us are pushing us hard. I don't know what our name will be called, but "we" will eventually push back.

    Replies: @anon

    Americans haven’t had that kind of opposition to power up their group cohesion in many generations.

    Jews “power up” their group cohesion by forming and promoting narratives of ethnic conflict with outsiders. (The “holocaust” story, etc.) In some cases their antagonism of other groups (theft of Palestine, for example) produces real conflict that serves to foment cohesion. The trick is to keep the conflicts just warm enough to stimulate cohesion.

  77. @Jack D
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    You and "Loyalty Over IQ Worship" pose a false choice - you can either have loyalty/white nationalism OR you can have IQ. If you two had larned that Spanish lingo, I would ask you, "¿Porque no los dos?"

    By identifying with stupidity, you do your cause no favor. No one wants to join the stupid party. This is an old problem for the right. The old German Social Democrats used to say that Anti-Semitism was the socialism of fools.

    OTOH, Leo Strauss argued that Stalin considered that the "socialism of fools" was a good thing because fools are common, so he deliberately cultivated Anti-Semitism as a means of gaining popularity. However, I have too much respect for the intelligence of the American people to think that would work here on any large scale.

    The circle that Steve and some others here seeks to square is a non-anti-white party that would be appealing to patriotic intelligent people and not just to fools.

    The one thing that the Democrats have achieved is that they have made their party welcoming to many groups who are not natural bedfellows - blacks and Jews, the super rich and the super poor, etc. Yes, it's a circular firing squad but as long as the deplorable white man is in the middle it all holds together (this BTW is why the Democrats NEED Trump even more than the Republicans do. He is the personification of the evil white man, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the Left.) Some people here, like Another Dad, seem to be more interested in who CANNOT belong to their party/country than who can. By the time some people here are done excluding everyone from their club, there are maybe 3 people left in America who would qualify, especially if you add being stupid to the list of qualifications. This is not a recipe for taking power.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    I never posed such a choice, that’s your reframing of the issue. Nobody would ever say you can either have smart people or you can have white people, but not both. LOL

    It’s not a matter of “identifying with stupidity” either, which is another false way of framing the issue. If someone is loyal to England or Japan or whatever nation you pick, then they do have a loyalty to that that nation. They may respect someone of high intelligence and good character from another nation, but they don’t try to form some international “high IQ” club that has first dibs on their loyalty.

    You are the one putting forward false dichotomies.

  78. @J.Ross
    @anon

    Everything is wrong with this statement and your point is unclear. Kennedy surely killed Kopechne through alcohol-exacerbated negligence. He dodged any serious charge, let alone punishment, through pseudo-feudal privilege: he simply waited for his blood to clear of testable alcohol, and the police, wouldn't you know it, were kind enough to wait with him; and top level friends of House Kennedy worked to Correct The Record in the already sympathetic newsmedia. Plus the moon landing happened at the same time so no one was watching. At no point would he have been culpable for murder. There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb, @HammerJack

    There is no reason to believe Kennedy, pig that he was, wanted Kopechne to die.

    Not even if she were pregnant? Never mind that though: more shocking by far than whatever he did or didn’t do to facilitate Mary Jo’s demise was the fact that instead of calling for help he went home and went to sleep. They say sleep comes easily to those with a clear conscience — or none at all.

    Even more shocking than that is that he did something vastly, immeasurably worse — to the nation.

  79. @11B4P
    @Hypnotoad666


    Leftist black Democrat narrowly beats leftist black Democrat, to represent leftist black Democrats.
     
    The District is 63.6% White and only 16.6% Black. Its Minnesotas 5th congressional district.

    Replies: @HammerJack

    Ain’t you heard of the 5/3rds law?

  80. @Anon
    @Pixo

    [[AIPAC did score two scalps this Dem primary cycle however: they stopped Donna Edwards from retaking her old seat in the US House, and they knocked off Andy Levin in Michigan, who despite being Jewish defended Tlalib and Omar and repeatedly voted against Israel. ]]


    Don't be a fool. Both Omar and Tlalib are under Jewish mafia control. The AIPAC needs slaves to support the bills against Iran that come to the whore houses, the congress and senate, to pass. Check for yourself to see that these 'black progressives', Omar, Cori Bush and Tlalib, have voted YES for every single bill AGAINST Iran written by the traitor zionists 'representatives' to satisfy their masters, the Jewish mafia. Why does AIPAC want to remove its slaves who are under control?
    Today, 75% of the slaves who are selected by the Jewish money to go to congress, senate or other center of power are BLACKS. No one has respect for these zionist black slaves anymore who are ready to kiss the Jewish mafia's behind. This is NOT democracy only hypocrisy. Only fools are voting.

    The 'timesofIsrael' reproted:

    [A new super PAC led by “Black and Jewish” leaders has endorsed five Black Democrats who have positions that are friendly to AIPAC, the latest sign that pro-Israel donors are determined to stem erosion of support for Israel among African Americans.]

    Rep. Shontel Brown, a pro Israel terrorist state, in Ohio defeated Nina Turner, a progressive, due to AIPAC money. Shontel Brown campaigns with Rep. Ritchie Torres, another black AIPAC slave pro Israel from N.Y., in Cleveland

    https://forward.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shontel-brown-gotv.jpg

    Replies: @Evocatus, @Pixo, @Charon

    Thanks. Good information. It probably won’t take quite as much time or money as it did to brainwash white people, but at least this does indicate that black people have finally arrived, politically speaking. They’re finally important enough to be co-opted.

  81. @notsaying
    It looks like her popularity is way down -- as is the number of voters in 2022 vs 2020. Her opponent Don Daniels came so close. He must be very frustrated.

    Replies: @JubalE

    Maybe he should marry her.

    • LOL: notsaying
  82. @Pixo
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “ However, the big problem with whites as a successful identity group is that it threatens the current reigning champ – Jews. ”

    Your insurmountable problem is that American white people really like Jews, and the more intelligent, wealthy, powerful, sociable, and generally effective they are, the more philosemitic they are.

    Now you may see this as a result of fear and bribery. And it is certainly true Jews are rich and tend to ruthlessly crush their domestic enemies. But they didn’t get to become rich and powerful without having many qualities Americans admire.

    Replies: @Fungus Among Us

    Your insurmountable problem is that you fail to distinguish between the Eastern Jews and the Western Jews- – something Jews themselves are almost always guilty of. The Goodwill that Americans feel / felt for Jews was for Western Jews. Unfortunately, the 1991 Lautenberg bill imported a whole population of Eastern Jews, the literal offspring of the Bolsheviks of Russia. These depraved monsters are the enemy of all mankind including, to a lesser extent, the Western Jews. There is no natural affinity from Americans for Victoria Nuland and her ilk.

  83. @Reg Cæsar
    @JimB



    Whites were helpless as a majority in America. They will be more powerful as a minority.
     
    But it will ruin them. Having to do everything for themselves gave whites an incentive to be hardworking and creative. As a master caste, they will transform into fat burping ugly Brahmins verbally abusing the help.
     
    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/06/14/arts/14gone-wind4/14gone-wind4-superJumbo-v2.jpg

    Replies: @JimB

    Yup!

  84. @Ian Smith
    Unpopular opinion: I love Ilhan Omar, if for no other reason than for how she triggers kosher conservatives.

    Replies: @but an humble craftsman

    I couldn’t agree more.

  85. don’t be such a dick.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS