I Will be Interviewed by Edward Dutton
RSS
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Update: the video of the interview will be up on Bitchute in several hours. Just go to Bitchute.com and search for Steve Sailer.
I will be interviewed on video by Edward Dutton on Thursday, 12/3, at 8pm London time, 3pm New York time, and noon L.A. time.
"Steve Sailer Joins Us at The Jolly Heretic and Notices a Thing or Two" https://t.co/EVw1KgUxyq via @YouTube
— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) December 2, 2020
You can watch it live, or later on Bitchute.
Any hints on lighting or camera angle to make me look less like Mitch McConnell?
Dude, you don’t look anything like Mitch McConnell!
Here’s my question to the two of you:
https://youtu.be/e0HAD2z6y5c
I’d recommend you add Larry Summers and Rahm Emanuel for a highly publicized (fake) spaceship to take the pressure off.
Unfortunately, I look like a turtle out of my shell on my laptop camera.
From the Wikipedia article on Stephen Maturin:
“
As well as his activities as a physician and agent, Maturin is a celebrated natural philosopher in the age of scientific discovery. He is, like Aubrey, a member of the Royal Society. His interests are wide, but he has a particular interest in wildlife, particularly birds and their anatomy. He discovers and names the hitherto unknown species of giant tortoise Testudo aubreii on a remote and uninhabited island in the Indian Ocean.”
But this video is still a classic.
https://youtu.be/XhfuGNDcdaA
You look nothing like Sheila Kuehl.Replies: @D. K.
You over pronounce middle syllables in long words.
That’s not such a bad thing, but it seems to give you a “midwest” accent to people who are not from there.
As for lighting, multiple sources looks better than one strong light or window.
I suggest starting the interview with a silly hat or disguise to distract the viewer from the inescapable fact that you resemble a rather tall turtle, and also Dutton likes that shtick. Also, make it so you’re looking slightly up at the camera, and maybe rest your chin in your hand, looking thoughtful.
Or you could just realize that 99% of your 99% male audience doesn’t care in the slightest what you look like, as long as you don’t look like those guys that run Twitter and Facebook.
Don’t do it Steve. It will only make you seem pedestrian. Take advantage of the mystique that the world of pixels provides to you and your thought.
I’m excited to see you! You don’t normally wear glasses do you? I imagine it’d be hard to pull a Mitch without any glasses.
Wear a tee shirt with “testudo Aubreii” on it?
From the Wikipedia article on Stephen Maturin:
“
As well as his activities as a physician and agent, Maturin is a celebrated natural philosopher in the age of scientific discovery. He is, like Aubrey, a member of the Royal Society. His interests are wide, but he has a particular interest in wildlife, particularly birds and their anatomy. He discovers and names the hitherto unknown species of giant tortoise Testudo aubreii on a remote and uninhabited island in the Indian Ocean.”
Camera needs to be eye level and parallel to the plane of your face.
Also, turn up your computer screen brightness to max as a diffuse source of facial illumination, in addition to some room lamps arrayed to provide multiple light sources and/or daylight through a window. Try different locations for the lamps and put white fabric over them if that helps. Think of the white umbrellas that are used to diffuse lighting in a portrait studio. Ring lights that surround the screen are nice. Maybe white string lights around the periphery of the screen would serve the same purpose.
A long blonde wig. It will make you look less like Mitch McConnell but more like Mrs. Clinton.
That depends on how long the journey takes.
If it is more than 20 years, you should probably take equal numbers of men and women, since the spaceship would run out of space if each man mated with multiple women.
If it was a shorter trip, the women to men ratio should be higher the shorter the trip is.
So, the number of men should be 10 + (2 x (number of years the trip would take up to 20)).
All the people should have IQs above 140. At least ten men and ten women should have IQs above 170.
Nobody should have any genetic disease (or highly heritable issues) in their ancestry at least four generations back.
All the people should be at least at the 80th percentile for height, no diabetes, no disabled people (a few mildly aspy people are fine), no severely colorblind. Everyone should have at least one grandparent who made it to 90, and no parents or grandparents who died of cancer, stroke, or heart attack before 80.
All the chicks should be at least 8s.
Nobody should share any great-grandparents.
.
https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2183782/84554382.jpgReplies: @kaganovitch, @Not Raul, @anon
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
You don’t look like Mitch McConnell.
If you have tinted eyeglasses or regular sunglasses, wearing them can help when appearing on laptop cameras.
Dont sweat the McConnel. Theres pictures of you around.
Mitch is better dressed than most congressman.
During your interview perhaps you can discuss the Chang’e-5 lunar landing and the fact that despite 40+ years, space control rooms are not diverse. The horror!
You do not look like Mitch McConnel. I even pulled up side by side pages to see if there was a resemblance. Nope. If anything Mitch wishes he would look like you.
Though Google is kinder to you as Mitch’s photos are all pretty much unflattering. He’s often bug-eyed, cagey, sour faced, weird turned down mouth, puffed cheeks, etc. You’d think the swamp would be kinder to its own.
Dutton was quite an excellent contributor on the McSpencer Group until he went full election COPE-r. Hope he moves on soon and gets back to the interesting content.
You’re still a long way from Mitch. He looks like a bespectacled guinea pig.
Position your laptop on something to raise the camera near face height. Lot’s of people don’t understand that, and they look like they are staring down at the viewer.
Avoid backlighting.
Keep the background simple. Maybe a few golf photos.
Also, shave, and say yes if anyone offers you makeup.
https://punditfromanotherplanet.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/history_kennedy_and_nixon_4th_debate_speech_sf_still_624x352.jpg
Though Google is kinder to you as Mitch's photos are all pretty much unflattering. He's often bug-eyed, cagey, sour faced, weird turned down mouth, puffed cheeks, etc. You'd think the swamp would be kinder to its own.Replies: @Steve Sailer
I keep telling that to my laptop camera, and it keeps showing me live video of myself looking like Mitch McConnell.
The easiest way to look less bad on your home computer: place your computer higher up and farther away from you than you might think necessary. You want at least a neck-and-shoulders shot with your camera at about eye level. If you can maintain good sound quality, you can even move the computer far enough back to show part of your torso below your shoulders. This positioning also makes it easier to look into the camera directly when you talk (you should strive to avoid looking down at your computer screen).
Most people sit too close to their computers, and end up being filmed from a low angle, i.e. up toward their faces. Pretty much everyone looks terrible this way.
Also, lighting makes a huge difference, but it’s hard to control outside a studio. You want a nice uniform light source that’s facing you, but that’s also not too harsh/casts shadows. Any light coming from behind you isn’t going to help.
Start with lighting because that will dictate where you are sitting. Open up your shades and let the natural light pour in; don’t let the light come in behind you.
Have your largest light source right in front of you. Face your brightest source of light (usually a window).
Your screen can be a large source of light, so adjust your screen brightness, especially if you are performing without natural light. A bright screen may add unflattering highlights to your face, making you look like Casper the Ghost.
There is one, and only one, acceptable camera angle: head-on at eye level.
Your table is almost certainly going to be lower than your face, and that means people are going to get an unflattering look up at you. Make sure your camera is at the same level as your eyes. You don’t want people to feel like they are looking up or down at you.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @Old Prude
I wouldn’t worry about it.
But this video is still a classic.
Say, “on the other hand,” and then “on the other other hand.” That would be cool.
https://medium.com/@stianchrister/24-memes-that-sum-up-jordan-peterson-vs-cathy-newman-7c7b9229f2fReplies: @Buzz Mohawk
Wear the Santa hat for contrast with Mitch.
Make sure there aren’t any little children running around your house.
Just be careful not to pull a Jeffrey Toobin….
Keep that stuff for when you're hiding in your closet.
Remember, you’ll need to create a few spaceships that are fake to throw off the Washington D.C. rats. That way you’ll have an uninterrupted selection process without political insiders or diversity typecasts all over you.
I’d recommend you add Larry Summers and Rahm Emanuel for a highly publicized (fake) spaceship to take the pressure off.
This sounds like a “mine-shaft gap” question. I’d say follow the wisdom of Islam and have a 4:1 ratio of females to males. Pick people with high IQ (obvious), with a doctorate (shows social conformity), and the most athletic in that subset (unless there is a reason I don’t know that athleticism won’t matter in space). Also have lots of genetic heterogeneity (people from every continent). In each subsequent generation, there will be in vitro selection (as Nick Bostrom describes in his wonderful book Superintelligence), so the best genes of these best people will be passed on to the next generation.
Cam eye-level and don’t sit too close are good tips. But frankly, most people will still look terrible.
Don’t worry too much about it though. Just as your voice never sounds as bad to anyone else as it does to you, you don’t look as bad to others as you think you do either.
The most important reminder is: don’t get caught Zoom dicking.
OT
Walter Williams died
😢 One of the greats. God rest his soul.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
The Last Real Calvinist nailed it.
Start with lighting because that will dictate where you are sitting. Open up your shades and let the natural light pour in; don’t let the light come in behind you.
Have your largest light source right in front of you. Face your brightest source of light (usually a window).
Your screen can be a large source of light, so adjust your screen brightness, especially if you are performing without natural light. A bright screen may add unflattering highlights to your face, making you look like Casper the Ghost.
There is one, and only one, acceptable camera angle: head-on at eye level.
Your table is almost certainly going to be lower than your face, and that means people are going to get an unflattering look up at you. Make sure your camera is at the same level as your eyes. You don’t want people to feel like they are looking up or down at you.
If it is zoom or something, and you can move his video window near your camera, that helps too, imo.
Look right into the camera, rather than at the screen, if at all possible.
At first I couldn’t get over the fact that a South African would be next in line for the POTUS, but then I remembered that I live in a country that elected Obama and recently chose a retarded corpse who among his voting constituents could claim 11 month olds and folks born during the Civil War era. So, yeah, Elon Musk VP.
Are you biased against whites?Replies: @Ron Mexico
Journalists always ask you first what you, the expert, think about a subject. Then (and this is radio and TV), they will go live and introduce you by telling the audience most of what you had just told them. As if they had always known those things. Then they ask you, live, what else you have to say. First time this happened to me, I was in shock, I had nothing left to say. So you have to keep something surprising back, so that you aren’t exploited. Just saying. But you probably already know this.
Why 80th percentile of height? It’s an advantage only in intraspecific competition, which is not the point of the selection.
If Dutton prefaces every question with “so what you are saying…”, leave the interview, Steve, you’ll exist in eternity as a meme.
https://medium.com/@stianchrister/24-memes-that-sum-up-jordan-peterson-vs-cathy-newman-7c7b9229f2f
As others have said, the most important thing is getting the laptop to eye level. Lighting it’s harder to give advice on because webcams do so many auto-adjustments. One idea: bouncing the light from a bright lamp off of the wall behind the laptop might not result in the best overall image quality, but it’s a decent hack for soft light.
But yeah, laptop at eye level for sure.
Wear this:
Who’s Edward Dutton?
https://www.youtube.com/c/DrEdwardDuttonTheJollyHeretic/
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thejollyheretic/Replies: @MEH 0910
Kick some tail Steve
Orange face makeup.
And, of course, Not Raul will be the captain of this ship, mild aspiness and all.
.
For 'certain values of mild'.
PS: Women really do come as a package. One of the two is instantly recognizable as hotter than the other in so many, seemingly independent, ways.
Lot’s suggestions were good. Also, I would recommend having the camera slightly above you, so that you’re looking up into it rather than down into it. Looking up stretches out your neck. Looking down into the camera makes one look jowly, like a bullfrog. Also, people can see your nosehair.
Good luck.
Saying “On the one hand…” is funny,………….if you’re Jeffrey Toobin.
Don’t shave anything but your neck, leave the beard and moustache but make it a little neat (but not too much)
https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/mitch-mcconnell-cocaine-t-shirt.jpgReplies: @Kronos
I’m kinda worried the cocaine in the background will look too much like food stains and/or dandruff. Too risky. Still a great shirt to wear while picking up Taco Bell with your friends at 3:00AM.
Don't worry too much about it though. Just as your voice never sounds as bad to anyone else as it does to you, you don't look as bad to others as you think you do either.
The most important reminder is: don't get caught Zoom dicking.Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist
This is excellent advice.
Try the camera above eye level too- use what looks best. We elevate the camera by putting the laptop on top of a stack of books or a desktop shelf. When the camera is too low it makes it can make the subject look sleepy or stoned with heavily-lidded eyes. If you have time to get one, a higher quality webcam with HD video quality and better light sensitivity than the native camera will look better. Autofocus can be slow to respond if you move much while talking, so look at a cam that can turn off autofocus or has a faster response time.
Also, turn up your computer screen brightness to max as a diffuse source of facial illumination, in addition to some room lamps arrayed to provide multiple light sources and/or daylight through a window. Try different locations for the lamps and put white fabric over them if that helps. Think of the white umbrellas that are used to diffuse lighting in a portrait studio. Ring lights that surround the screen are nice. Maybe white string lights around the periphery of the screen would serve the same purpose.
I forgot to mention, Barron Trump is POTUS. At least he is over 80th percentile height. Maybe he can the mate with the Rwandan president’s daughter.
Happens when Dad is reasonably tall and model Mom is 5'11".
.
https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2183782/84554382.jpgReplies: @kaganovitch, @Not Raul, @anon
mild aspiness and all
For ‘certain values of mild’.
Walter Williams diedReplies: @Kolya Krassotkin
Re: Walter Williams’s passing.
😢 One of the greats. God rest his soul.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090724083833/http://economics.gmu.edu:80/wew/gift.html
Start with lighting because that will dictate where you are sitting. Open up your shades and let the natural light pour in; don’t let the light come in behind you.
Have your largest light source right in front of you. Face your brightest source of light (usually a window).
Your screen can be a large source of light, so adjust your screen brightness, especially if you are performing without natural light. A bright screen may add unflattering highlights to your face, making you look like Casper the Ghost.
There is one, and only one, acceptable camera angle: head-on at eye level.
Your table is almost certainly going to be lower than your face, and that means people are going to get an unflattering look up at you. Make sure your camera is at the same level as your eyes. You don’t want people to feel like they are looking up or down at you.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @Old Prude
Beyond even eye level, a shot from slightly above is preferable to a shot from slightly below. An above/downward shot obscures signs of aging like sagging jowls.
Regardless of angle, avoid direct lighting. When I Zoom, I turn off the lights in my kitchen, open the door to the living room slightly, and let the light from the other room bounce off the white walls in front of me. This creates a nice balance in favor of illuminating the face over illuminating the background, and the soft disperse reflected light illuminates my face evenly without casting shadows.
Make sure you wear the right colors. There is an old book from the 1980s called Color for Men you should pick up if you’re going to be in video much. For you, Steve, don’t wear black or white or other colors/patterns with strong contrast.
I recommend using ear buds, but not those Apple ones that make you look like you’re wearing earrings. And if you’re going to be doing more podcasting in the future, a good tabletop microphone looks good and improves sound quality. But the number one thing for that is your internet connection.
For example, I'm sure many readers here would pay big money to see you do the interview in blackface.Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
Here’s another idea: for your panhandling, do what Michael Malice does and agree to wear/do things on camera in return for donations.
For example, I’m sure many readers here would pay big money to see you do the interview in blackface.
You should be able to pull off this look with with free software.
Eggs and sperm of me and my 1,000 closest kinfolk
“All the people should have IQs above 140. At least…ten women should have IQs above 170….
“All the chicks should be at least 8s.”
Assuming that this isn’t a complete joke (“…and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues…”), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8’s and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.
And that'd still be true even if you personally never got to lay your hands on one. (Just as today most guys don't, yet they still manage to get through life okay.)
Ah yes because high IQ definitely doesn’t come with any drawbacks
Wow…….
Prof. Edward Dutton: The Jolly Heretic
https://www.youtube.com/c/DrEdwardDuttonTheJollyHeretic/
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thejollyheretic/
It helps weed out people with stunted growth.
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
Well, the spaceship only holds 100 people.
.
https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2183782/84554382.jpgReplies: @kaganovitch, @Not Raul, @anon
Sorry, Buzz; but you and your two friends wouldn’t meet the criteria.
Some say Jill Biden has a penis.
Yes, do not ‘wax the dolphin’ or ‘pull the penguin’ on the visual feed.
Keep that stuff for when you’re hiding in your closet.
Wear a face mask. Then you’ll look like a Ninja Turtle.
Can’t he just use a Snapchat filter or something like that? It would be much cheaper.
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
Taylor Swift is the ultimate modern-day example of ludicrously good facial genes and scary levels of intelligence in a woman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4f9AYRCZYReplies: @duncsbaby
What a timeless classic.
I had no idea that you (think you?) look like McConnell.
His face is the one I use as the exemplar of the meaning of the wonderful German word “Backfeifengesicht” : A face in search of a fist.
Oh dear.
Some fill light in front and from below will soften or eliminate the shadows around the eyes and below the nose. Side light increases the wrinkles.
There’s plenty of videos on YouTube. Better from slightly above, with good light which depends on your house. Choose your background wisely. Don’t sweat it, you are who you are, and it’s too late to be an actor anyway.
Anglo-American world domination soon.
Just wear your mask Steve, and you’ll look like anyone else.
Steve,
When will you provide your readers with a breakdown of what happened with Prop 16? Are you waiting for the state of California to finally get the votes counted?
https://www.youtube.com/c/DrEdwardDuttonTheJollyHeretic/
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thejollyheretic/Replies: @MEH 0910
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
“If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so”
This is an iStevey question – is intelligence inherited more from the mother than the father, as I’ve seen alleged?
Frankly I’d take a pleasant 5 or probably less over an unpleasant 8. Is there any level of beauty for a long term relationship where unpleasantness could be acceptable?
“It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman and in a wide house”
The math is pretty easy. Child's intelligence is sampled randomly from a bell curve centered on the mean of the parents' intelligences (after adjusting for regression to the mean, as necessary).
The only other wrinkle is that the bell curve has a slightly fatter left tail, since there's a lot that can go horribly wrong, but not much that can go dramatically right.
Are news interviewees allowed to make lighting requests?
——–
Apparently numbers aren’t squaring and trailers full of ballots have “gone missing” and none of this is “evidence.” The other day Giuliani presented to the Michigan stare house an unprepared, wierdly combative witness who had been an actual Dominion contractor and not just an ejected court mandated observer.
Get a Logitech camera with a USB connection.
Place your laptop on a pile of books so that it faces you at your own level, not up your nose.
Have a good diffuse light source on your face, California sun or a studio type light.
Make sure your background is tidy.
OT: Former Bill Clinton handler Doug Band gives a rare interview to Vanity Fair. He had a falling out with Bill which he blames on Chelsea being jealous of his relationship with Bill and the Clintons blame on the brazen influence peddling he was engaging in through the Clinton Foundation.
It includes some hilarious lines and claims. Band voted for McCain and Romney and declined to say who he voted for in 2016 and 2020. He says he didn’t go to Epstein’s island with Bill, even though he went almost everywhere with him. Also, that he got “bad vibes” from Epstein and tried to get Bill to stop talking to him. Band also claims he met with Mike Pompeo in 2019 to discuss becoming the U.S. Government’s chief hostage negotiator. He claims he turned it down because it would mean too much time away from his wife and kids. How many hostage negotiations have we had in the last two years?
The comments from Band, the Clinton flacks and the editorializing on Trump by the reporter all so clearly demonstrate why we are declining. These people are incompetent grifters with no permanent loyalties who have no idea what they are doing but manage to keep the system going because everyone at the top is on the game.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/12/confessions-of-a-clintonworld-exile
OT: Speaking of Nixon: Offensive Nixon Tapes Released, Newly Released Nixon Tapes, Offensive Nixon Tapes Released
That’s not such a bad thing, but it seems to give you a “midwest” accent to people who are not from there.
As for lighting, multiple sources looks better than one strong light or window.Replies: @ganderson
Yah yahknow, nothin wrong with a midwest accent, donchaknow…
https://twitter.com/gabegundacker/status/930953031369273344/photo/2
Dutton films from his rape dungeon. The visuals are horrid. I get him to reposition his camera so you don’t have the upper half of the screen detailing his grubby dungeon ceiling (YES. I DID IT. I nagged him relentlessly. I also got him to hang pictures, for visual detail. Ask him. ) I tried to get him to change his lighting set up – to absolutely no avail. C’est la vie. So I wouldn’t worry.
One thing you can do is wear flattering clothing. Don’t wear a white shirt. Without a professional set up – a white shirt take over the imagery. Navy blue signals “authoritative” i.e. – you know your stuff and you can be trusted. Don’t wear dull greens, browns or yellows – you’ll look sallow with your coloring. A bright, clear strong color will work best. There is a pic of you wearing a blue striped shirt with a blazer – that’s perfect. All the other suggestions people have made are good – except the general lighting suggestions. Backlighting can be terrific IF you know what you are doing. 3 point lighting is simple, classic, and adds depth to the visuals. But since you are doing this in what I presume is your home office – the camera placement is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING.
I will be watching the replay on Bitchute. Bon voyage!
Agree that blue > white for Sailer.Replies: @Angharad
If you tilt the screen back so you are looking at it directly, isn’t the camera effectively at eye level?
https://medium.com/@stianchrister/24-memes-that-sum-up-jordan-peterson-vs-cathy-newman-7c7b9229f2fReplies: @Buzz Mohawk
That is a great link. Thank you!
Steve seems to have been moving to the Democrat “center,” dropping immigration concerns while amping up the COVID.
Lo and behold, now he is starting to get invites.
Be real…be yourself–and bugger camera angles.
Ed isn’t a journalist though, he won’t be pulling gotcha stunts like that.
I feel the camera angle thing has been discussed here before in the intermittent debate about why male movie stars tend to be of below average height.
I’m sure Patrick McGoohan got a mention, often being pictured slightly from above. It seems to be a more flattering pose.
Below average height, above average heads. Josh Brolin is a good example of this imbalance. Thanks for the pic of Patrick McGoohan in his Prisoner garb. Mercurial Irishman; like a bomb waiting to go off.
If you have tinted eyeglasses or regular sunglasses, wearing them can help when appearing on laptop cameras.Replies: @Anonymous
Then he looks all glaucoma’d and weird retired to the sunbelt nut
Dont sweat the McConnel. Theres pictures of you around.
Mitch is better dressed than most congressman.
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
God doesn’t give with both hands.
Place your laptop on a pile of books so that it faces you at your own level, not up your nose.
Have a good diffuse light source on your face, California sun or a studio type light.
Make sure your background is tidy.Replies: @BenKenobi
Don’t forget to take that copy of Mein Kampf off the bookshelf.
Something I do whenever my wife’s Israeli friend comes over.
You are welcome.
Why is one more African POTUS such a big deal?
Are you biased against whites?
Yes! Two of my favorite blokes to join at the pub today. Cheers.
Avoid “um” and “yuh know,” the auditory pauses that mainly liberals use.
“I am of two minds”. Always a cool starter.
Start with lighting because that will dictate where you are sitting. Open up your shades and let the natural light pour in; don’t let the light come in behind you.
Have your largest light source right in front of you. Face your brightest source of light (usually a window).
Your screen can be a large source of light, so adjust your screen brightness, especially if you are performing without natural light. A bright screen may add unflattering highlights to your face, making you look like Casper the Ghost.
There is one, and only one, acceptable camera angle: head-on at eye level.
Your table is almost certainly going to be lower than your face, and that means people are going to get an unflattering look up at you. Make sure your camera is at the same level as your eyes. You don’t want people to feel like they are looking up or down at you.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @Old Prude
Thank you. I will TRY to pass this along to Mrs Prude, who stares into her iPhone, back to the picture window, screen pointed up at the recessed lights on FaceTime calls. All chin and glare.
My take on Dutton and Saini and Trump and the rancid Republican Party and Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(s 386) is the best in the English speaking world and I would like to hear Dutton’s take on US politician whores selling out the sovereignty of the USA by flooding more Asian Indians into the USA.
I am glad that I didn’t vote for Trump nor any other rancid Republican Party politician whore after the nasty mass immigration fanatic politician whores in the US Senate let Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(S 386) sail through the US Senate with no objections.
I wrote this in October of 2019 and it still stands:
Ed Dutton’s main problem is that he won’t be able to top his impeccable mimicry of Angela Saini ever again. Ed Dutton must live in the knowledge that his best has been done, and the proceeding years will bring only faded glory as compared to his Saini. Maybe Dutton can do a good Sinatra?
Peak Dutton was reached and it’s all downhill from here. Although his Angela Merkel ain’t bad. I like the way Dutton says Guhrman or Guhrmany too.
Asian Indian Angela Saini slops her crud in to defend the dolts that say race ain’t real and race isn’t all about genetics and race has very little to do with IQ rates for racial groups.
Angela Saini thinks the Asian Indians are very clever indeed.
Trump’s plot to flood the USA with Asian Indians is another excellent reason to support another presidential candidate and another political party besides the rancid Republican Party.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/race-genetics-and-pseudoscience-an-explainer/#comment-3523422
Ed Dutton Must Be Challenged On His Unhinged Thatcherism Boosterism And Sailer Can Bring Up His Thatcher Anecdote To Dutton.
I wrote this in December of 2019 about our mutual friend Ed Dutton and his Dickensian Dastardly Thatcherism love affair(part 1):
2019 has been ANNUS DUTTONUS DISAPPOINTIMUS.
Sir Edward Dutton — The Jolly Heretic Mutant Expert — has let us down horribly.
Sir Edward Dutton revealed himself to be a medium level IQ MUTANT who can’t make the connection between that filthy HAG MUTANT GLOBALIZER TART Margaret Thatcher and the high cost of housing in England and Affordable Family Formation and monetary policy and mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and genetic mutants attacking the young through inter-generational violence of a disgusting sort.
Sir Edward Dutton also peaked out and reached the upper limits of his astonishing ability to mimic actual human people and caricatures of certain ethnic and ancestral and genetic groups. Sir Edward’s mimicry of Angela Saini is the best he has ever done and he will never again reach that sublime extremity of melding as one with his mimicry subjects. Ed Dutton is on the downslope and he knows it! How disappointing Sir Edward!
Back to that nasty globalizer whore tart Margaret Thatcher.
I was watching Sir Edward Dutton and his overly thin Scottish pal go on and on about their joy that the Labour Party had its tits put through the wringer by the Tories — with the help of the Brexit Party — and then Sir Edward disappointed me terribly when he banged on like a mutant dope about how wonderful it was that one of his blood relations was able to purchase a council house in a council estate — or something similar — due to the machinations of globalizer tart mutant Margaret Thatcher and the Tories and that the value of that abode had boomed in a most extraordinary way, thereby enriching one of medium level IQ Ed Dutton’s blood relations.
The horror of watching the Scottish dope and the disapponting Ed Dutton reveal themselves to be accomplices to inter-generational violence that hampered AFFORDABLE FAMILY FORMATION made me boil with shock at the antics of Sir Edward Dutton!
Attention Sir Edward Dutton:
That damn globalizer tart Margaret Thatcher set in motion a vicious and disgusting attack on the ability of future English people to be able to enjoy AFFORDABLE FAMILY FORMATION and you cheered it on because one of your blood relations of a certain generation was able to buy his council house on the cheap and monetary policy and immigration policy ballooned the frigging Hell out of the value, thereby doing direct and deliberate harm to the younger people who now have to face massive increases in housing costs due to that globalizer tart Thatcher and, in part, your damn blood relation.
This guy Sir Edward Dutton is a mindless genetic mutant who absolutely adores this dead globalizer tart Margaret Thatcher and her frigging Tory Party and their efforts to crush the young by massively inflating the cost of housing for young English people.
Sir Edward Dutton:
You are the damn genetic mutant, you pudgy English turd!
Just having fun, Sir Edward Dutton, but my point is rather clear to many young people and to this geezer middle aged White Core American.
HAPPY NEW YEAR! Even To That Margaret Thatcher Loving Dope Named Sir Edward Dutton!
https://www.unz.com/avltchek/in-the-u-k-do-subjects-deserve-their-rulers/#comment-3629177
Get Mitch to stand in for you while you do voice overs, then claim that he isn’t him.
I understand the camera angle concern. From the front I look debonair and intelligent; from the side I look like Neandertal man.
I wrote this in December of 2019 about our mutual friend Ed Dutton and his Dickensian Dastardly Thatcherism love affair(part 2):
Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher are almost as rancid as Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, but they are only slightly less rancid because the American Empire has taken over most of the duties previously carried out by the British Empire, which croaked 70 years or so ago.
Thatcher and Reagan and Clinton and Blair used monetary extremism and mass immigration to attack and destroy their own nations.
Thatcher that rat whore bought and paid for the support of certain generational cohorts in England by giving the British bastards their government apartments and government houses in a one shot deal that highly benefited the bastards getting the newly privatized housing but it grievously harmed the future generations who saw the cost of housing go through the roof.
Thatcher was pushing mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration, just like that corrupt dirtbag Ronald Reagan, and Thatcher knew damn well that she was attacking future English generations by putting in motion all manner of policies that would harm the ability of future generations in England to enjoy AFFORDABLE FAMILY FORMATION.
Any bastard who praises Reagan or Thatcher or Blair or Clinton can go straight to bloody Hell!
Globalization and financialization and transnationalism and using monetary policy to attack future generations are what Reagan and Thatcher and Clinton and Blair were all about.
English YouTuber Ed Dutton made my blood boil recently by praising that treasonous Limey tart Margaret Thatcher.
https://www.unz.com/avltchek/in-the-u-k-do-subjects-deserve-their-rulers/#comment-3629177
More Dutton and Saini stuff from July of 2019:
Ed Dutton is getting pushed around by some filthy billionaire internet corporation controllers.
The Virginia Company must dislodge the current controllers of the internet from power and put people in charge who will let guys like Ed Dutton have their say.
Obama most likely has some Virginia Company ancestry from his Dunham side.
The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire and the JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England is using interloper lantern holder propaganda puppets to push anti-White propaganda.
Ed Dutton is getting pushed around by foreigner thugs such as Angela Saini and it is extremely irritating to see.
Ed Dutton is English and proud of it, and Ed Dutton will keep fighting until victory is assured and the battle has been won.
Ed Dutton Fights On, So I Shall Too!
I like Ed Dutton much better than that departed Democrat Party oaf Fred Dutton.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/saini-sports-and-iq-the-persistence-of-race-science-in-compe/#comment-3356942
https://graziadaily.co.uk/beauty-hair/makeup/how-to-look-good-on-zoom-video-calls/
^The fashion designer Tom Ford knows his stuff.
– A key thing is to raise the camera of your computer to eye level with a stack of books or magazines, and make sure that your light source doesn’t cast lots of shadows on your face.
– Wear a shirt in a color that looks good on you (ask your wife), but avoid white and black. Use a bit of paper towel or toilet paper to blot the natural shine on your face, as the camera emphasizes shine.
– Look at yourself on camera before you enter your video chat with Dutton, just so you won’t fret about what you look like. During the chat, if you can’t get rid of that little video of yourself in an upper screen corner, put a sticker over it so that you don’t cast glances at yourself. (I use a cut-out from a sanitary pad lol).
Enjoy your discussion, I will try to tune in!
Indeed it is a more flattering pose than from below. Straight on is best, though.
Actors with short bodies have faces and heads that show up better on screen. That’s because our human heads do not vary as much in size as the bodies that support them.
(Think of the body as the system that provides the environmental life support for the head, and you will begin to understand what we really are. We are heads on sticks. Sculptures and portraits that depict only heads are considered perfectly normal, when in fact, if you really think about it, they are creepy, decapitated representations of the physical individuals.)
If you are tall but don’t have a big head, you end up looking like a pinhead on screen, and you never get hired to have a high-paid career in anything visual.
Porn directors/photographers understand this. They tend to hire, not always but often, small-bodied men and women. Also, they prefer little women with small hands. All this is to make some things — not necesarily heads — look bigger on screen. They also often shoot with short lenses, which accentuate this effect. Don’t ask me how I know this.
BTW, McGoohan’s is the pose I used the last time I got my driver’s license renewed. I’m tall, and I was tired of looking like Mitch McConnell. The camera was positioned for the average of male and female drivers’ heights, so I deliberately looked down toward the camera, exactly like that.
I do think that is the essence of what Steve is getting at. The turtle look is the result of one’s neck and jowls looking bigger than they are. The reason Steve looks like Mitch on video is because he is tall and the camera is positioned too low for him.
Sit much lower and further back from the laptop than usual.
i’m one of the 410 waiting on the YT page for it to start. Makes me wish i’d set up an adequately anonymized (maybe full timed VPNed) account so i could log in and comment in the chat …
I love it! He’s in his closet, with his clothes hanging behind him!
And of course, she’s childless.
Not true. What about Kate Beckinsale?
Steve does not look like Mitch McConnell at all in this interview, and the camera angle is correct. He also appears to have a good wardrobe. He can be happy.
He did the interview from his famous closet?Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
Due to assortative mating, and other factors, good things tend to be correlated. Steve has made that point a number of times.
She’s extremely intelligent and spectacularly ignorant. So yeah, definitely a modern woman.
Apply make-up and talk about your voluminous hair Steve…..get in touch with your inner bimbo….
Only very slightly, and those with stunted growth are PREFERABLE to those without, as the quality of their genotypes is understated by the measurable phenotypes.
Are you biased against whites?Replies: @Ron Mexico
When I bought a condo in Del Mar my agent was S. African white dude. I asked him if I could call him an African American. He was slightly amused.
Lo and behold, now he is starting to get invites.Replies: @Ron Mexico
You gotta put food on the table.
Too bad Elena Della Donne is a lesbo. She would be an ideal mate for height and attractiveness. I would go for a younger Dafne Schippers in this planned breeding scenario.
Well done, Mr. Sailer.
Bwahahahaaaa!
^The fashion designer Tom Ford knows his stuff.
- A key thing is to raise the camera of your computer to eye level with a stack of books or magazines, and make sure that your light source doesn't cast lots of shadows on your face.
- Wear a shirt in a color that looks good on you (ask your wife), but avoid white and black. Use a bit of paper towel or toilet paper to blot the natural shine on your face, as the camera emphasizes shine.
- Look at yourself on camera before you enter your video chat with Dutton, just so you won't fret about what you look like. During the chat, if you can't get rid of that little video of yourself in an upper screen corner, put a sticker over it so that you don't cast glances at yourself. (I use a cut-out from a sanitary pad lol).
Enjoy your discussion, I will try to tune in!Replies: @AnotherGuessModel
Haha, you weren’t kidding all this time that you work in your closet! You looked good, in fact I think the interviewer could use a few tips from you on how to look better on camera!
One thing you can do is wear flattering clothing. Don't wear a white shirt. Without a professional set up - a white shirt take over the imagery. Navy blue signals "authoritative" i.e. - you know your stuff and you can be trusted. Don't wear dull greens, browns or yellows - you'll look sallow with your coloring. A bright, clear strong color will work best. There is a pic of you wearing a blue striped shirt with a blazer - that's perfect. All the other suggestions people have made are good - except the general lighting suggestions. Backlighting can be terrific IF you know what you are doing. 3 point lighting is simple, classic, and adds depth to the visuals. But since you are doing this in what I presume is your home office - the camera placement is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING.
I will be watching the replay on Bitchute. Bon voyage!Replies: @Chrisnonymous
Backlighting is an artsy technique that creates atmosphere rather than enhancing the subject’s appearance. It’s a poor suggestion for an intellectual interview and should be avoided in 99% of cases.
Agree that blue > white for Sailer.
? Where’s the video? I can’t find it on either YouTube or BitChute.
Lou Dobbs believes Bill Barr is compromised.
Naw, this would be the perfect Police Squad moment. Sit higher so only your torso is showing.
As I suspected, Steve talks in mixture of vocal fry and uptalk, with a heavy use of the work ‘like’. All he needed to do was chew gum and roll his eyes constantly and he would have perfected his radically fashionable image.
What happened to concern on these pages about the ongoing mass immigration disaster?
It’s been COVID, COVID, COVID for 10 months.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
Immigration is a greater existential threat than Covid.
What happened to concern on these pages about the ongoing mass immigration disaster?
It’s been COVID, COVID, COVID for 10 months.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
I said:
My take on Dutton and Saini and Trump and the rancid Republican Party and Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(s 386) is the best in the English speaking world and I would like to hear Dutton’s take on US politician whores selling out the sovereignty of the USA by flooding more Asian Indians into the USA.
I am glad that I didn’t vote for Trump nor any other rancid Republican Party politician whore after the nasty mass immigration fanatic politician whores in the US Senate let Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(S 386) sail through the US Senate with no objections.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/i-will-be-interviewed-by-edward-dutton/#comment-4320577
https://twitter.com/JxhnBinder/status/1334733907208654848?s=20
https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1334708349217038337?s=20
https://twitter.com/USTechWorkers/status/1334673354930982913?s=20
https://twitter.com/RepGosar/status/1334839042773544960?s=20
https://twitter.com/USTechWorkers/status/1334677959345647621?s=20
For example, I'm sure many readers here would pay big money to see you do the interview in blackface.Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
Hell, I’d even pay money to see Obama do an interview in black face.
Sailer, you don’t look like Bitch McConnell. You’re just a normal looking dude, though you looked better before the weight loss – I know Boomers love to feel skinny.
Invest in speech therapy. You have a high, strangulated voice utterly at odds with your height. A man of defective speech is not to be trusted. Trustworthy men speak clearly, from the chest.
“I look like a turtle out of my shell.”
You look nothing like Sheila Kuehl.
“He also appears to have a good wardrobe.”
He did the interview from his famous closet?
“male movie stars tend to be of below average height”
Below average height, above average heads. Josh Brolin is a good example of this imbalance. Thanks for the pic of Patrick McGoohan in his Prisoner garb. Mercurial Irishman; like a bomb waiting to go off.
Not just interviews, they give the impression they’re knowledgeable about all sorts of things they were completely clueless about till two seconds ago. And even after they’ve done their “research”, they’re still largely clueless, simply because it’s not possible to truly know something a subject without having studied it in some depth. I’ve really come to resent this about journalists.
Next time, consider something more like this:
"All the chicks should be at least 8s."
Assuming that this isn't a complete joke ("...and they should all be able to tie a cherry knot with their tongues..."), now there you got greedy. If a woman is a true 8, with a pleasant personality and placid temperament, an IQ of 120-130 is perfectly adequate to produce bright offspring when her male partner has an IQ of 140 or so.
How many women do you think there are who are both (i) at least true 8's and (ii) 140+ IQ (much less 170+ IQ)?
Answer: not enough, and a lot fewer than you think.Replies: @Not Raul, @Single and Ready to Drop Red Pills, @YetAnotherAnon, @ScarletNumber, @silviosilver
But it’d sure be nice to live in a world in which their proportion was growing instead of declining (ie the world we actually live in).
And that’d still be true even if you personally never got to lay your hands on one. (Just as today most guys don’t, yet they still manage to get through life okay.)
You should hire three or four rap-video hoes to feed you grapes and massage your scalp onscreen between questions.
Even cooler if you can find one that’ll let you strike her onscreen, and then you face the camera and say, “Please excuse that bitch, she still in trainin’.”
well, yeah. There are all kinds of ways to use high intelligence. When one uses it to enter an indoctrination program where one internalizes an entire worldview — that shows a certain taste for social conformity. Exactly what one would want from a fellow traveler in a starship.
I watched the first minute or two of the video, and it seemed like Dutton was going to be a Jordan Peterson-esque interviewer (doing all the talking himself), and decided to get some sleep.
Now this morning I can’t find the video on Bitchute: It’s not in Dutton’s Jolly Heretic channel (“Edward Dutton” channel search) nor does it come up for “Steve Sailer” recent first.
Why is he bothering to keep it off of YouTube, considering all the crimethink stuff he does there?
Barron Trump is now 99th percentile height. Probably 6’5″+. pic
Happens when Dad is reasonably tall and model Mom is 5’11”.
Now this morning I can't find the video on Bitchute: It's not in Dutton's Jolly Heretic channel ("Edward Dutton" channel search) nor does it come up for "Steve Sailer" recent first.
Why is he bothering to keep it off of YouTube, considering all the crimethink stuff he does there?Replies: @HA
When I click on the Tweet’s youtube link, all I see is:
“Video unavailable This video is private.”
Those de-platforming bots are fast!
You look nothing like Sheila Kuehl.Replies: @D. K.
“Kuehl was born Sheila Ann Kuehl[1] in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Her father, Arthur, was an airplane construction worker at Douglas Aircraft.[2] He was Catholic and her mother, Lillian, was Jewish.[3]”
It’s going to be almost exactly 50/50.
The math is pretty easy. Child’s intelligence is sampled randomly from a bell curve centered on the mean of the parents’ intelligences (after adjusting for regression to the mean, as necessary).
The only other wrinkle is that the bell curve has a slightly fatter left tail, since there’s a lot that can go horribly wrong, but not much that can go dramatically right.
You can watch the interview here, about 18 minutes in: https://dlive.tv/p/lukefordlivestreams+Mkgtly0MR
Or listen here: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593/2020-12-03-11-44-13a
He did the interview from his famous closet?Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
Yep.
He could have easily set up in his living room or someplace like that, but this is a good look, and Steve knows it. It says, “because I notice things and speak the truth, I have to work in a closet.” It’s sort of like John Derbyshire’s photo of himself digging a deeper hole.
I just searched Edward Dutton’s most recent videos on BitChute, and it’s not there. Maybe he hasn’t uploaded it yet.
Good example. Or Geena Davis- hottie, Mensan, affable, and for the heightist contingent she’s six feet tall.
Invest in speech therapy. You have a high, strangulated voice utterly at odds with your height. A man of defective speech is not to be trusted. Trustworthy men speak clearly, from the chest.Replies: @vhrm
Are you sure? idk about voice stuff, but, my reaction was the opposite. Having never heard Steve before i found his voice pleasant, clam and credible.
Agree that blue > white for Sailer.Replies: @Angharad
Chrisnonymous – I like atmosphere. And again – you really really really have to know what you are doing. And I DO. I’m really good with lighting techniques. I could do lighting set up that would make Sailer look like a young Brad Pitt.
I caught about 2 minutes in passing. It will be up on Bitchute in a day or 2. The lighting was excellent. Sailer glowed like a little boy singing in a Christmas choir. Unlike Duttie’s hostage video lighting. Sailer’s clothing was PERFECT. The lighting was excellent. The camera placement, in my not so humble opinion, was a tad too up above. The setting, however? ???? It’s as though Sailer was doing something naughty whilst hiding from his wife. What “in the closet” some type of ….a…message?
In addition to the message I mentioned that his closet setting sends, which I think is cool and appropriate and in fact a trademark, I think Steve was doing it from the closet as a favor to his loyal fans. We appreciate being invited into the legendary closet where the magic happens, and we thank him. Very cool.
“And of course, she’s childless”
She has a beautiful face, but the minute she puts on an extra pound or two it all goes on hips and thighs. The lovely Jennifer Saunders, on whose bone structure you could sharpen a pencil, is the same.
Nonetheless, I hope she does reproduce. Kylie Minogue being childless (not to mention Gilligan’s Mary-Ann) really is a genetic crime.
Never pull your Toobin on camera — unless you are being paid to do so.
Perhaps Toobin’s ordeal will yet prove to be a blessing to him. If he writes a tell-all memoir, for example, it might be hailed as
On the other hand, there might not be much of a market for signing events, or hand-signed copies…
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbvKUEXNaDUReplies: @Dissident
It’s been COVID, COVID, COVID for 10 months.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
Immigration is a greater existential threat than Covid.Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @Charles Pewitt
Mr Anonymous[836] says:
What happened to concern on these pages about the ongoing mass immigration disaster?
It’s been COVID, COVID, COVID for 10 months.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
I said:
My take on Dutton and Saini and Trump and the rancid Republican Party and Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(s 386) is the best in the English speaking world and I would like to hear Dutton’s take on US politician whores selling out the sovereignty of the USA by flooding more Asian Indians into the USA.
I am glad that I didn’t vote for Trump nor any other rancid Republican Party politician whore after the nasty mass immigration fanatic politician whores in the US Senate let Mike Lee’s Asian Indian Flood The USA bill(S 386) sail through the US Senate with no objections.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/i-will-be-interviewed-by-edward-dutton/#comment-4320577
It’s been COVID, COVID, COVID for 10 months.
Barely a one of you, much less Steve, has remarked that the United States is continuing to import hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals in the middle of a pandemic, amidst a recession and historic unemployment. The Senate passed a bill yesterday to bring in even more Indian subcontinentals. No coverage by Steve.
Immigration is a greater existential threat than Covid.Replies: @Charles Pewitt, @Charles Pewitt
Indeed, he could take matters in hand and rise to the occasion. Then something good might come of it. He could beat this, if he doesn’t choke.
.
😢 One of the greats. God rest his soul.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
I think we should remember that among his other gifts, Professor Williams freely granted white people absolution for the sins of their forebears.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090724083833/http://economics.gmu.edu:80/wew/gift.html
I’m not going to be able to walk for a few minutes. I don’t want to frighten the horses.
Is she really so ignorant, or does she just know her fan base?
Hmmm . . . dunno. If their parents didn’t feed them right, it ain’t a good sign. 🥦
Kylie should’ve had a whole litter of kids with Jean Claude Van Damme back when they had an affair. Literally would’ve birthed a master race.
Having your first child, you used to be considered an "elderly prima" at over 25 in the UK, then over 30, but the official definition is over 35. Also sometimes called "senile gravida" ;-)
Tick.. tick.. tick ...Replies: @anon
Taylor Swift will be 31 in a few days. It’s not so difficult having babies at 37 if you’ve already had a couple by then. It’s just not a great time to start. 31 is much better.
Having your first child, you used to be considered an “elderly prima” at over 25 in the UK, then over 30, but the official definition is over 35. Also sometimes called “senile gravida” 😉
Tick.. tick.. tick …
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d6/ea/8c/d6ea8ce76e6d008dbfc25b49ee26e0ca--alarm-clock-clocks.jpg
Having your first child, you used to be considered an "elderly prima" at over 25 in the UK, then over 30, but the official definition is over 35. Also sometimes called "senile gravida" ;-)
Tick.. tick.. tick ...Replies: @anon
Taylor Swift will be 31 in a few days.
I did enjoy the interview. Edward Dutton came in with good questions. I would like Mr Sailer expound in a bit more detail what he thinks the future possibilities for the US are, given that we are so deeply and bitterly polarized.
.
https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2183782/84554382.jpgReplies: @kaganovitch, @Not Raul, @anon
No hoverhand detected. He’s holding ’em like Trump would.
PS: Women really do come as a package. One of the two is instantly recognizable as hotter than the other in so many, seemingly independent, ways.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbvKUEXNaDUReplies: @Dissident
I was about to respond earlier but then I thought: Hasn’t poor ‘ol Toobin been through enough already? Should we really be