RSS
I want to thank everybody who has contributed to my December fundraiser so far.
In a better world, I could probably make a decent living as a normal opinion journalist. Of course, we don’t live in that world, so that means it’s more important for me to be able to scratch out a living noticing important patterns in how the world works. Therefore, I rely upon my readers for support.
Here are ten ways for you to help me carry on:
First: Most banks now allow fee-free money transfers via Zelle.
Zelle is really a good system: easy to use and the fees are nonexistent.
If you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay/Zelle. Just tell WF SurePay/Zelle to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrAT aol.com — replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.) Please note, there is no 2.9% fee like with Paypal or Google Wallet, so this is good for large contributions.
Zelle contributions are not tax deductible.
Second: if you have a Chase bank account (or even other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay/Zelle (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay/Zelle to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com — replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it’s StevenSailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.) There is no 2.9% fee like with Paypal or Google Wallet, so this is also good for large contributions.
Third, Zelle might work with other banks too. Here’s a Zelle link for CitiBank. And Bank of America.
Fourth: You can use Paypal (non-tax deductible) by going to the page on my old blog here. Paypal accepts most credit cards. Contributions can be either one-time only, monthly, or annual. (Monthly is nice.)
Fifth: You can mail a non-tax deductible donation to:
Steve Sailer
P.O Box 4142
Valley Village, CA 91617
I have no idea why somebody carefully hung this empty picture frame from a tree alongside the Fryman Canyon hiking trail, but I appreciate it, like I appreciate your support.
Sixth: You can make a tax deductible contribution via VDARE by clicking here.
Please don’t forget to click my name at the VDARE site so the money goes to me: first, click on “Earmark your donation,” then click on “Steve Sailer:”
This is not to say that you shouldn’t click on John’s fund too, but, please, make sure there’s a blue dot next to my name.
VDARE has been kiboshed from use of Paypal for being, I dunno, EVIL. But you can give via credit cards, Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin, check, money order, or stock.
Note: the VDARE site goes up and down on its own schedule, so if this link stops working, please let me know.
Seventh: send money via the Paypal-like Google Wallet to my Gmail address (that’s isteveslrATgmail .com — replace the AT with a @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Eight: You can send me Bitcoin. Bitcoin payments are not tax deductible.
Here’s my Bitcoin address:
1EkuvRNR86uJzpopquxdnmF23iA3vzdDuc
Here’s the OCR
Please let me know if this works, ideally by sending me Bitcoin. Or let me know what else you’d like to send me.
If you’re sending to a crypto address that belongs to another Coinbase user who has opted into Instant sends in their privacy settings, you can send your funds instantly to them with no transaction fees. This transaction will not be sent on chain, and is similar to sending to an email address.
Learn more about sending and receiving crypto.
Send off-chain funds
Mobile
- Tap
at the bottom
- Tap Send
- Tap your selected asset and enter the amount of crypto you’d like to send
- Enter the Receiver’s crypto address or scan their crypto QR code to see if the address belongs to a Coinbase user
Computer
-
Sign into Coinbase.com
-
Click Send at the top right
-
Click your selected asset and enter the amount of crypto you’d like to send
-
Enter the Receiver’s crypto address or scan their crypto QR code to see if the address belongs to a Coinbase user
Obsolete: Below are links to two Coinbase pages of mine. But these don’t work anymore. I will try to fix them. This first is if you want to enter a U.S. dollar-denominated amount to pay me.
Pay With Bitcoin (denominated in U.S. Dollars)
This second is if you want to enter a Bitcoin-denominated amount. (Remember one Bitcoin is currently worth many U.S. dollars.)
Pay With Bitcoin (denominated in Bitcoins)
▲▼Ninth: I added Square [which is now Block] as a fundraising medium, although I’m vague on how it works. If you want to use Square, send me an email telling me how much to send you an invoice for. Or, if you know an easier way for us to use Square, please let me know.
Tenth: Venmo: https://account.venmo.com/u/SteveSailer
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Done.
In a more decent world, you, Colin Flaherty (in the past), Jared Taylor, Lauren Southern, John Derbyshire, Dan Bongino, Ann Coulter could make good to excellent money from normal advertising and monetizing videos, articles, etc.
Demonetizing, deleting, blocking, even badmoutning are all dirty tricks of the Left who finally marched through ALL INSTITUTIONS, including decolonizing math facutles
I am willing to donate a couple of hundred to you for commenting on
4Honesty.com
sincerity.net
Truthrevolution,net
Sites who all have the preposterous claim to have a parsimonious explanation and a solution to the takeover of the Left
The acceptance of dishonesty is the the original sin,
radical scientific honesty, intolerance for all but full disclosure is the solution (which, of course, will meet resistance)
Having a one-pointed emphasis on nothing but freedom of #TrueSpeech, and mandatory requirement to mention alternative theories to Ta Nahesi Coates and Ibram X Kendi’s explanations would meet resistance but is a moral high ground.
I seek to either convince, or have constructive discussion. Not for my Ego, but because I think it is a useful approach to save the world from PC
Why not Substack? I’d pay $50/yr
What is your current lifetime word count with and without comments?
What was the date of your first blog post?
Happy New Year
No money for COVID enablers.
In a better world, we wouldn’t need you, Steve.
Some for specific subject areas like sports, entertainment, or narrow topics.
Even the formerly liberal/left ones like Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are now free to write what they find on Substack, and get paid. Driven out of former "mainstream" media.
Advertising supported "journalism" is nearly dead, thanks to online monopolies which like Google, FaceBook, etc, pretend to be content neutral but which are not.
And open comment sections are rare. Yes, they fill up with robots and crazies, the panoply of human mental illness and the like, but where enough manage to contribute something worthwhile, you discover many interesting things, and avenues to further explore.
You content moderation is very good, despite the abuse you get.
Let's hope you can continue to do your good work!
As a Pure Blood, I wish everyone at Sailer…
🎆 HAPPY NEW YEAR 🎆
In a better world, there would be Nuremberg-style trials for sportswriters who called Alvin Dark a racist. Prosecutor Steve: “but he played them, right?”
https://i0.wp.com/www.baseballamore.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Campanis_Al_1990_TargetDoders100Yrs_105_Front_small.jpg?w=400&ssl=1
Happy New Year!
Happy new year! I know we had some differences this year but I hope we go back to our regular relationship. I’ve followed you for over twenty years. A few rough exchanges shouldn’t change that.
Superb point, but let’s remember it only applies to helping us understand the false narratives and the unravellings of society. Okay, that’s probably the greater part of iSteve. But that still leaves the rest of the topics – – those engaging, informative diversions from our not-better world. And of course, there’s the matter of hosting these fine comments and personal anecdotes.
In a better world, we’d still have crime, corruption in government and business, a low brow, occasionally degenerate popular culture, financial swindles big and small, problems with drug and alcohol abuse, people entering the country illegally, and even war, pestilence and death.
People would also say mean things to one another.
Always have, always will.
But all of the above would at least be acknowledged and recognized as problems, not the norm or things to be encouraged as normal, apologized for, and/or covered by the government and its mass “media” propaganda institutions.
Key is the amount of dysfunction.
If the waters of dysfunction are swirling around your ankles, you can still live a pretty good life wearing rubber boots.
If you have to tread water, it's a whole 'nuther level of suck.
Happy New Year!
https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/2015/2-mathematicia.jpgIf 1729 is a "taxicab" number, what is 2023? A Cybertruck number?Replies: @J.Ross
OT — “I also orchestrated it.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/i-also-orchestrated-it-uncharged-j6-witness-ray-epps-transcript-released
Remember who won't touch the issue and adjust your opinion of their bravery and credibility accordingly.Replies: @Corvinus
iSteve Buccothon officials are pleased to announce that the performance bonus will once again be in effect if the Pirates can lose less than 100 games in ’23!
Steve – I imagine you could live anywhere in the world at this point. Have you thought about cashing in your home equity and moving to a lower COL area? Just curious.
Best wishes for the New Year and you are doing the Lord’s work. Thank you.
Happy New Year.
Jackie Robinson’s only white roommate:
Happy New Year Steve and everyone!
“Strange Overtones” @ 4:33
AnotherDad wrote to Sailer:
There will always be a minority of morally crippled men who thirst for power and who are willing to lie, steal, and kill to obtain power.
And there will always be a much larger group of people willing to be manipulated and deceived by those who lust for power.
So, I am afraid we will always need those willing to shout out the truth.
Happy New Year, everyone.
Extraordinary and complex statement, Steve. at least in my opinion this New Year’s Eve. How much of the rhetorical aggro and angst here on UR comes from people, most of us no longer young, who’ve made a considered, cold-blooded judgment that their personal and vocational skill set is okay, but that the America and the world they live in has gone wobbly and is bloody well inimical to their very being?
Happy New Year to all, and a belated Merry Christmas, too.
(OT: I’m reading McMeekin’s Stalin’s War. FDR appears as something like Communist-philic or Stalin-philic. Is there any source for FDR’s attitudes towards Germans?)
I’ll send something in a bit.
https://twitter.com/MathsEdIdeas/status/1607869145231630343
https://twitter.com/AlbertEinstein/status/1608965175649894402Replies: @Reg Cæsar
Thanks. I was just thinking of Ramanujan’s number, 1729, this afternoon, sad that there was nothing special about the coming year’s number. It’s not even prime. But it is special after all.
If 1729 is a “taxicab” number, what is 2023? A Cybertruck number?
https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/2015/2-mathematicia.jpgIf 1729 is a "taxicab" number, what is 2023? A Cybertruck number?Replies: @J.Ross
But also it guarantees something bad will happen. They just love their special dates.
Cheers and Happy New Year!
That’s true. In this abnormal world, you seem to have to promote pro-war, pro-regime BS.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/i-also-orchestrated-it-uncharged-j6-witness-ray-epps-transcript-releasedReplies: @Hypnotoad666
Yep. The FBI (or some other part of the deep state), obviously orchestrated the whole “insurrection.” But even alleged free thinkers and free speakers and “noticers” won’t say a word about it. Pathetic.
Remember who won’t touch the issue and adjust your opinion of their bravery and credibility accordingly.
You appear to think that you and Steve are more-or-less equal partners in this enterprise.
People would also say mean things to one another.
Always have, always will.
But all of the above would at least be acknowledged and recognized as problems, not the norm or things to be encouraged as normal, apologized for, and/or covered by the government and its mass "media" propaganda institutions.Replies: @bomag
Agree.
Key is the amount of dysfunction.
If the waters of dysfunction are swirling around your ankles, you can still live a pretty good life wearing rubber boots.
If you have to tread water, it’s a whole ‘nuther level of suck.
Until Mr. Sailer starts to substantively address HbD and how it intersects with religion, then he’s doing the Lord’s work. But he hates to be wrong, and there’s dog food to buy.
Happy New Year.
Remember who won't touch the issue and adjust your opinion of their bravery and credibility accordingly.Replies: @Corvinus
No, January 6 was orchestrated by Trump’s minions. Me. Sailer would have written several stories indicating that it was an inside job on the part of the FBI.
But even he knows it was the handiwork of Trump.
Well?
Oh, that's right, it was all cooked by the FBI working with the Clinton campaign.
How about the information in Hunter Biden's laptop?
Russian disinformation, right?
That's what you psychos claimed.
How'd that work out for you?
It's confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6.
Here's a New Years resolution for you: Stop lying.Replies: @Corvinus
Just like Trump “colluded” with Russia to “steal” the 2016 election, right? Is your Mueller Report out yet? Remember all the dirt you promised would be in there?
Well?
Oh, that’s right, it was all cooked by the FBI working with the Clinton campaign.
How about the information in Hunter Biden’s laptop?
Russian disinformation, right?
That’s what you psychos claimed.
How’d that work out for you?
It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6.
Here’s a New Years resolution for you: Stop lying.
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Brutusale, @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910
From what I can tell there are hardly any “decent opinion journalists” to be found in most paid mainstream journalism, magazines, newspapers (!) or even online.
Some for specific subject areas like sports, entertainment, or narrow topics.
Even the formerly liberal/left ones like Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are now free to write what they find on Substack, and get paid. Driven out of former “mainstream” media.
Advertising supported “journalism” is nearly dead, thanks to online monopolies which like Google, FaceBook, etc, pretend to be content neutral but which are not.
And open comment sections are rare. Yes, they fill up with robots and crazies, the panoply of human mental illness and the like, but where enough manage to contribute something worthwhile, you discover many interesting things, and avenues to further explore.
You content moderation is very good, despite the abuse you get.
Let’s hope you can continue to do your good work!
Well?
Oh, that's right, it was all cooked by the FBI working with the Clinton campaign.
How about the information in Hunter Biden's laptop?
Russian disinformation, right?
That's what you psychos claimed.
How'd that work out for you?
It's confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6.
Here's a New Years resolution for you: Stop lying.Replies: @Corvinus
“Remember all the dirt you promised would be in there?“
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.
Wow. It's only the first day of the year, and already Corvinus has won the internet for all 2023 for sheer blind irony. Would-be competitors -- hit the showers, it's already over.
Steve, if you *really* want to fund-raise big time, you should set up a pay-only "Match Wits with Inspector Corvinus" online game. Other people could pay to watch on the sidelines, just for the lulz. You could even cut him in for a percentage of the take, although it would be much funnier if he didn't know what was going on. Who knows, judging by the evidence, maybe it's going on right now and I'm the one who wasn't informed.
But why let this valuable resource rattle on for free? Seems like a wasted opportunity.Replies: @Corvinus, @kaganovitch
https://www.justsecurity.org/advisory-board/
Nothing to see here, plebes. Move along.Replies: @Corvinus
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1608981407048822784
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1608972002873991170Replies: @Corvinus
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372354902728708
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372360304992257
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372365753499650
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372371101138949
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372376792891395
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372382899707905
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372389258280967
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372394366943234
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372401409282048
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372407549730826
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372412419280899
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610374999210164230
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610375349535121409
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610375673868156935
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610376067453272065
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610376851377061888
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610377238335131649
Demonetizing, deleting, blocking, even badmoutning are all dirty tricks of the Left who finally marched through ALL INSTITUTIONS, including decolonizing math facutlesReplies: @Curle
They, The Left, didn’t march through the institutions alone. They were given an huge assist from the ‘nothing to see here’ Ryan wing of the Republican Party. It was a group effort and credit where credit is due.
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Brutusale, @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910
“Grow up.”
Wow. It’s only the first day of the year, and already Corvinus has won the internet for all 2023 for sheer blind irony. Would-be competitors — hit the showers, it’s already over.
Steve, if you *really* want to fund-raise big time, you should set up a pay-only “Match Wits with Inspector Corvinus” online game. Other people could pay to watch on the sidelines, just for the lulz. You could even cut him in for a percentage of the take, although it would be much funnier if he didn’t know what was going on. Who knows, judging by the evidence, maybe it’s going on right now and I’m the one who wasn’t informed.
But why let this valuable resource rattle on for free? Seems like a wasted opportunity.
Even he knows that January 6 was a Trump inspired effort. He’s not about to admit it openly and lose his meal ticket.
Wow. It's only the first day of the year, and already Corvinus has won the internet for all 2023 for sheer blind irony. Would-be competitors -- hit the showers, it's already over.
Steve, if you *really* want to fund-raise big time, you should set up a pay-only "Match Wits with Inspector Corvinus" online game. Other people could pay to watch on the sidelines, just for the lulz. You could even cut him in for a percentage of the take, although it would be much funnier if he didn't know what was going on. Who knows, judging by the evidence, maybe it's going on right now and I'm the one who wasn't informed.
But why let this valuable resource rattle on for free? Seems like a wasted opportunity.Replies: @Corvinus, @kaganovitch
You’ve already donated to Me. Sailer in enough virtue signaling and buffoonery. Take a break knowing it’s a job well done on your part.
Even he knows that January 6 was a Trump inspired effort. He’s not about to admit it openly and lose his meal ticket.
Wow. It's only the first day of the year, and already Corvinus has won the internet for all 2023 for sheer blind irony. Would-be competitors -- hit the showers, it's already over.
Steve, if you *really* want to fund-raise big time, you should set up a pay-only "Match Wits with Inspector Corvinus" online game. Other people could pay to watch on the sidelines, just for the lulz. You could even cut him in for a percentage of the take, although it would be much funnier if he didn't know what was going on. Who knows, judging by the evidence, maybe it's going on right now and I'm the one who wasn't informed.
But why let this valuable resource rattle on for free? Seems like a wasted opportunity.Replies: @Corvinus, @kaganovitch
OT: Just wanted to thank you for the recommendation of “On Horseback through Asia Minor”. Absolutely fascinating read. Thanks again and a happy New Year to you and yours.
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Brutusale, @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910
Look at this collection of Deep State minions! Thanks for exposing another group of psychopaths.
https://www.justsecurity.org/advisory-board/
Nothing to see here, plebes. Move along.
But even Mr. Sailer as I have correctly stated knows how much Trump and his team was involved in January 6. He has to avoid openly discussing it. It’s bad enough he is on the COVID and Ukrainian train. One more recognition of truth and he’s losing a shit ton of dog food money.
https://www.justsecurity.org/advisory-board/
Nothing to see here, plebes. Move along.Replies: @Corvinus
In your typical way, rather than address the substance of the issue at hand, you attack the source. I get it. You don’t know any better.
But even Mr. Sailer as I have correctly stated knows how much Trump and his team was involved in January 6. He has to avoid openly discussing it. It’s bad enough he is on the COVID and Ukrainian train. One more recognition of truth and he’s losing a shit ton of dog food money.
OT: Another good idea from Florida prohibiting state employees from feeding at the troughs they regulate. Of course, those affected went to court alleging restrictions on their “free speech”.
Something like this on the federal level would put a major hurt on the DC economy, and do much to reduce the incestuous corruption that is the federal government.
Ron? Hello? You there?
https://archive.ph/Wfef5
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Brutusale, @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/12/twitter-files-explained-elon-musk-taibbi-weiss-hunter-biden-laptop.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/
"Any update from claim that Russian oligarchs signed Trump's bank loans?"
The more relevant question is Trump's relationship to Deutsche Bank.
https://www.fastcompany.com/90464228/the-journalist-who-revealed-the-secrets-of-trumps-relationship-with-deutsche-bankReplies: @MEH 0910
There is. You simply don’t want to believe it.
“It’s confirmed there were Federal operatives throughout the crowd on January 6“
By whom?
https://www.justsecurity.org/83891/the-missing-review-of-fbis-january-6-intelligence-and-law-enforcement-failures/
—So what do we make of these conflicting, sometimes incoherent, and even incorrect statements by FBI leadership and anonymous internal sources following January 6? The most generous interpretation was that the FBI, at this early stage, was simply caught flat-footed by the January 6 attack, much like it was on 9/11. If the Bureau did not have enough actionable intelligence, and was treading extra-cautiously to avoid being accused (again) of engaging in politically biased investigations based on animosity toward Trump, then maybe there was another failure to “connect the dots” – perhaps facilitated by implicit institutional and individual biases that did not view the rhetoric leading up to the Trump rally through a terrorism lens. Until the January 6 hearings this year, that was at least a plausible explanation.—
Grow up.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Brutusale, @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910
Nope. Just one human to another.
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1608981407048822784
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1608972002873991170Replies: @Corvinus
Digital Harpo, the interpretation of what the Twitter Files means by Taibbi and Weiss has been taken to the woodshed.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/12/twitter-files-explained-elon-musk-taibbi-weiss-hunter-biden-laptop.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/
“Any update from claim that Russian oligarchs signed Trump’s bank loans?”
The more relevant question is Trump’s relationship to Deutsche Bank.
https://www.fastcompany.com/90464228/the-journalist-who-revealed-the-secrets-of-trumps-relationship-with-deutsche-bank
https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-twitter-files-and-writing-for*****https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1589703553643577344
*****Same journalist David Enrich:
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1316401546930905089
https://web.archive.org/web/20220924041111/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/technology/no-there-isnt-evidence-that-trump-owes-money-to-russia.html
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/12/twitter-files-explained-elon-musk-taibbi-weiss-hunter-biden-laptop.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/
"Any update from claim that Russian oligarchs signed Trump's bank loans?"
The more relevant question is Trump's relationship to Deutsche Bank.
https://www.fastcompany.com/90464228/the-journalist-who-revealed-the-secrets-of-trumps-relationship-with-deutsche-bankReplies: @MEH 0910
Freddie deBoer:
https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-twitter-files-and-writing-for
*****
*****
Same journalist David Enrich:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220924041111/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/technology/no-there-isnt-evidence-that-trump-owes-money-to-russia.html
The lesson here is that Tracey, Taibbi, and Weiss are attempting to force people to live in a pseudo reality of their own creation, one where everything people physically experience doesn’t matter. We’re supposed to accept what these talking heads tell us is truth rather than our own eyes.