The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Gratitude: Rwandan Refugee Housed by Nantes Diocese Confesses to Setting Nantes Cathedral Ablaze
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From the Daily Mail:

Rwandan refugee, 39, faces up to 10 years in prison after admitting arson attack on Nantes cathedral
By Peter Allen and Lydia Catling For Mailonline
06:50 26 Jul 2020,

A Rwandan refugee could face up to 10 years in prison after admitting setting fire to Nantes cathedral.

He’d been arrested before, denied his crime, and was let go. But now they had more forensic evidence, so when arrested a second time, he broke down and confessed.

The 39-year-old man, who has solely been identified by his first name Emmanuel, worked as a volunteer security guard at the 15th-century Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paint which set alight last week. …

Emmanuel was being housed by the Nantes diocese, having arrived in France five years ago, and was one of seven security guards at the cathedral.

Meanwhile, in the arson investigation of the fire that gutted the San Gabriel Mission, one of the oldest buildings in Southern California, the police have arrested a suspect. They first arrested him for another fire-starting incident and now he think he also did the big one too. His identity has not been released.

Whether these best known of the glut of church-burnings recently were ideologically-motivated or were merely the work of the usual nuts, perhaps excited by the media-endorsed craziness of 2020, is unknown.

 
Hide 94 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Diversity is strength. Arresting an African for arson is racism. Read Leonard Pitts. Ask Coronoavinus.

    • Replies: @Old Prude
    @No Recent Commenting History

    You forgot "white women dig black imigrents".

  2. 1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you’d have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You’d have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.

    Maybe he’s not grateful because he’s a con man.

    • Agree: vhrm
    • Replies: @vinteuil
    @Art Deco


    Why is he billeted in France?
     
    Well, presumably, because somebody with the motive & the power to bring him & keep him there...wants him there.
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Art Deco


    Why is he billeted in France?
     
    Nantes is the center point of the majority of the world's land. Perhaps they intend to start there and spiral outward.



    https://alchetron.com/cdn/land-and-water-hemispheres-6688c89f-2632-4919-821d-0f4a2b27e40-resize-750.gif



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns8eQtxogPI


    (NB: this videomaker's example clips at times confuse symmetry with the Fibonacci sequence.)

    The geographic center of Africa is not that far from Rwanda. It's not the same as the "pole of inaccesibility", but is pretty inaccessible itself:

    Arriving at the Heart of Africa!

    Rwanda and her twin Burundi, though once Belgian colonies, are threatening to switch to the left-hand traffic of their neighbors. Maybe the arsonist just prefers to drive on the right, like the French? The old British colonies of West Africa, hemmed in by the old French ones, now drive on the right.
    , @dearieme
    @Art Deco

    "The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime."

    A friend who spent some time there recently told me that it's not at all ordinary - at least by African standards. It's competent.

    And just at the moment their not burning down their own cities.

    , @Ian Smith
    @Art Deco

    .The French have a long history of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrophilia

    , @Pittsburgh Thatcherite
    @Art Deco

    In Western nations, citizens (through their taxes) pay for government benefits for foreigners.

    But in the middle-eastern kingdom of Dubai, the opposite is true: Foreign guest workers (through fees and taxes) pay for generous government benefits that are available only to citizens:
    - Government jobs - Retire at age 49 with a minimum pension of $2800 per month
    - Subsidized housing
    - Free healthcare

    90% of Dubai’s population are foreign guest workers:
    - No access to any government benefit
    - Deported if unemployed
    - Never allowed to become citizens

    In Dubai, almost all public-sector workers are citizens, and almost all private-sector workers are foreigners.

    Dubai has benefited greatly from importing millions of foreign guest workers from all over the world.

    But the foreign guest workers have also benefited greatly.
    A laborer who earns $60 per month in India can earn $300 per month in Dubai.

    Many laborers send $200 per month home to their families.
    $200 per month greatly improves the quality of life of a poor family in South Asia.

    Foreign guest workers enjoy other benefits:
    - Safe drinking water
    - Almost no crime
    - Different religions and ethnicities coexist peacefully

    Dubai, which has almost no oil, has created a revolutionary new approach to immigration:

    Dubai sells the right to live in Dubai to foreigners, then spends the revenue on generous benefits for Dubai’s citizens.

    Other nations could adopt Dubai's profitable immigration policy.
    These nations could allow foreigners to live within their borders in exchange for a monthly fee.
    Foreigners could be confined to special economic zones.

    Also, entrepreneurs could create completely new nations and allow people to live in these new nations for a monthly fee.

    These new for-profit nations could earn enormous profits, while giving billions of migrants an opportunity to earn vastly higher salaries.

    , @anon
    @Art Deco

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.

    Replies: @Gordo

    , @Tono Bungay
    @Art Deco

    The French are quite simply resigned to their own extinction. They won't say it quite so plainly, but it's true. One of their leading intellectuals, Michel Onfray, says Europe is decadent and Muslims are not, and he detests Catholicism and rather enjoys decadence, and so the situation is hopeless, et voilà c'est tout. Revolting.

    , @anon
    @Art Deco

    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you’d have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well.

    Not if Jeff Epstein provided a ride in his jet. Johnny123 will be on that soon.

  3. What’s perhaps worth checking is how the various major news outlets treat the story.

    • Replies: @Cato
    @Colin Wright


    What’s perhaps worth checking is how the various major news outlets treat the story.
     
    Ehh? Major news outlets carrying this story? Where?
  4. “Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paint which set alight last week”

    Unaware that France had an actual Saint Paint. Was he the patron of brushes? Typo obviously intended for Sts’ Peter and Paul.

    • Replies: @Change that Matters
    @Yojimbo/Zatoichi

    SJWs employed in the MS Office Spell Check team have been quietly working on the Ethical Spell Checker©. After some initial confusion over bewitchment versus sequential lettering, the Crack Spell Check Blacks! (NB: includes whites and other non-Blacks!) have been hard at work erasing spell checker functions for white, Christian, privileged male words. In order to allay suspicions (until it's too late to act), the rollout of ESP will be incremental. Full uptake is scheduled for mid-2021, by which time correct spelling with be redundant anyway.

  5. When are the French going to … get mad!

    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish … of Americans.

    • Replies: @anon
    @AnotherDad

    When are the French going to … get mad!

    Which French? The gilaut jaunes were protesting in the streets for close to a year. How did the French people in the French government choose to respond? What about the French people in the French media?

    Brecht may be laughing in his grave.

    Replies: @Huisache

    , @houston 1992
    @AnotherDad

    once he finishes prison, does he get to stay in France?
    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic, but ethnic resentments are thicker and more motivating than religious faith

    Replies: @Hibernian, @Alden

    , @ATBOTL
    @AnotherDad

    What are you talking about? France has the largest nationalist movement in the West. It has the highest percentage of the population opposing globalization of any Western country. They are fighting back. A poll from early this year had Macron at 55% and LePen at 45% for the next election. That was before the latest madness. LePen received over 60% of the under 25 vote in the last election.

    Worry about America, this is the only white country with no organized pro-white political activity.

    Replies: @Diversity Heretic

    , @JohnnyWalker123
    @AnotherDad

    They do get mad........ a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by...... invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of "them."

    Every time there's a terrorist attack, you get the same response. "Support the troops." "Win the war on terror!" "They hate us for a our freedom."

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as "unpatriotic" and "sympathetic to the enemy." For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been "shut and support the troops." "Don't question US foreign policy." "The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us."

    So I wouldn't describe the U.S. (and its allies) as "weak" and "self-hating." Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there's something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There's something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they're getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don't much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it's because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never "we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims." The response is never "we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants." The response is ALWAYS "stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas."

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The "far left" agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The "far right" agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It's because both the "far left" and "far right" don't fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as "extremists" by the Jewish megaphone. That's why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who's a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice "democracy." America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue......... until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue....... until there's a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they'll b*tch about all the "Anti-Semitism" that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @kaganovitch, @IHTG, @Inquiring Mind

    , @IHTG
    @AnotherDad

    "Why isn't everybody getting mad? Why aren't people going on a rampage at the sight of these aliens among us?" is basically the animating question at the center of far right politics. It's something that ought to be examined directly rather than dancing around and assuming things will work out somehow if you cite enough hatefacts.

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard

    , @John Pepple
    @AnotherDad

    Maybe the Greeks are starting to get mad, now that Hagia Sophia has been turned into a mosque.

  6. anonymous[384] • Disclaimer says:

    White “privilege” is NO BORDERS. If any other group was denied the right to borders or homogeneity, to be forced endless “assimilation”, it would be called genocide. And genocide is never justified.

    When White people are the majority, then it’s minority rights, diversity, open borders, etc. When ANY other race is the majority, the precise opposite applies. This isn’t “antiracist”, it’s anti-White.

    It was never about oppression, slavery, whatever. There is no “social justice” for the long colonized and enslaved Greeks and Slavs, nor is their punitive “antiracism diversity” for Turks, Japanese, Mongolians, North Africa, etc.

    White people are the Natives of the European civilization on this continent called America. It was built by us, in our image, for Ourselves and Our Posterity.

    If an antiwhite believes he’s on “stolen land”, his moral obligation is to GET OFF OF IT, and “give back” his stolen house, bank account, car, and relinquish all of the benefits of White American civilization. Instead he’ll keep his “loot” and demand we import more “thieves” to further “steal” from the Aboriginals.

    We don’t fight because “Dems Are Real Racists!”. We fight because we oppose anti-Whiteism and we oppose White Genocide.

    • Agree: throtler
  7. anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    When are the French going to … get mad!

    Which French? The gilaut jaunes were protesting in the streets for close to a year. How did the French people in the French government choose to respond? What about the French people in the French media?

    Brecht may be laughing in his grave.

    • Replies: @Huisache
    @anon

    This metaphor is exhausted. Brecht is not doing anything. He is long dead.

  8. How about following the 10 years in prison with deportation back home to Rwanda?

    How about the Nantes diocese ceasing to harbor these vipers?

  9. So, I think you and the French have the wrong idea here.

    The French should be grateful that this superior human from Rwanda has graced them with his presence and has attempted to disabuse them of their primitive religion!

    Nothing could be clearer!

  10. @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    once he finishes prison, does he get to stay in France?
    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic, but ethnic resentments are thicker and more motivating than religious faith

    • Agree: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @houston 1992


    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic..
     
    He could be, but that isn't and shouldn't be a condition for receiving aid from the Catholic Church. However, that aid should have been received in the first safe country, and don't tell me it's France. Rwanda is fairly far south in Africa and not that near either the east or the west coast. Might be in the Animist belt with some Christians; not sure who the original colonial power was.
    , @Alden
    @houston 1992

    I saw in freerepublic he’s a Muslim when he was first arrested.

  11. Anonymous[322] • Disclaimer says:

    Now I have the Beastie Boys “Gratitude” song stuck in my head. Oh well, at least I’m “anonymous”

    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    @Anonymous

    The terms "Beastie Boys" and "song" don't belong in the same sentence.

  12. He probably blames the Belgians for the fire.

  13. Meanwhile you still think there’s a media/government coverup/conspiracy over Notre Dame.

  14. What are the odds that Emmanuel of Rwanda had been sexually exploited by someone on the staff of the cathedral?

    Or could he have taken a bribe to set the fire?

    The advertised maximum punishment of ten years’ imprisonment and a small fine is not enough.

    The arsonist should have been deported years ago (but of course everyone knows that).

    Is Emmanuel of Rwanda a Hutu or Tutsi? Or neither? Does it matter? Are Hutus more likely to torch French cathedrals?

    • Replies: @Mike Pierson, Davenport Rector, Midfielder
    @Veracitor


    What are the odds that Emmanuel of Rwanda had been sexually exploited by someone on the staff of the cathedral?
     
    Way to make up a BS story out of thin air, so you can blame white people. Why are you even posting here? You could be raking in the big bucks writing material for the mass media.
  15. David Hume, in his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals – without a doubt, one of the half dozen most important works in the history of ethical theory – includes “gratitude” in his list of words that “always [at all times, in all languages, in all cultures] express the highest merit that human nature can attain.”

    Obviously, he never encountered a Rwandan.

    But, then, come to think of it, he did encounter Jean-Jacques Rousseau, at some length. So I guess this passage, like so many things in liberal ideology, represents the triumph of optimism over experience.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @vinteuil

    Hume on race:


    I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but 'tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly.
     

    Replies: @vinteuil

  16. @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    What are you talking about? France has the largest nationalist movement in the West. It has the highest percentage of the population opposing globalization of any Western country. They are fighting back. A poll from early this year had Macron at 55% and LePen at 45% for the next election. That was before the latest madness. LePen received over 60% of the under 25 vote in the last election.

    Worry about America, this is the only white country with no organized pro-white political activity.

    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    @ATBOTL

    I live in France and I wish I could share your optimism. I haven't see the poll you cite (the ones I've seen indicate that Marine Le Pen generally tops out at about 40%) but there is simply no way Marine Le Pen will be the next president of France. Most of the momentum at the moment is for the EELV (environmental) Party, which won some major mayoral contests (e.g., Bordeaux). The EELV are firmly pro-invader. All of the other parties will unite to keep the RN out of power and the French electoral system gives them only a few seats in the National Assembly. And the demographicc situation in France may make an RN victory impossible by 2027. So yes, France does have an anti-invader party, but it's electoral prospects are dim.

    With all its drawbacks, I do think that the situation in France is better than that in the U.S. (one reason I chose to live here) partly because of the existence of the RN.

  17. Okay. One bad apple. Are we to ignore all the Rwandan engineers, doctors, researchers, architects, pilots and entrepreneurs sloshing around France?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Just another serf

    "... sloshing about"?

    How about "hacking their way around France"?

  18. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Well, presumably, because somebody with the motive & the power to bring him & keep him there…wants him there.

  19. @Veracitor
    What are the odds that Emmanuel of Rwanda had been sexually exploited by someone on the staff of the cathedral?

    Or could he have taken a bribe to set the fire?

    The advertised maximum punishment of ten years' imprisonment and a small fine is not enough.

    The arsonist should have been deported years ago (but of course everyone knows that).

    Is Emmanuel of Rwanda a Hutu or Tutsi? Or neither? Does it matter? Are Hutus more likely to torch French cathedrals?

    Replies: @Mike Pierson, Davenport Rector, Midfielder

    What are the odds that Emmanuel of Rwanda had been sexually exploited by someone on the staff of the cathedral?

    Way to make up a BS story out of thin air, so you can blame white people. Why are you even posting here? You could be raking in the big bucks writing material for the mass media.

  20. Why are the French authorities, both civil and ecclesiastic, keeping Emmanuel of Rwanda’s real name a secret? If the suspect were of ancient and pure gallic extraction, would not the story lead off something like “Nantes Cathedral security guard Emmanuel Barrere faces up to ten years in prison for…” ??

    (Yeah, I know the answer. And of course the media are in on it.)

  21. It’s probably just a big misunderstanding. A young, inexperienced volunteer security guard had some matches that set alight a fire at a cathedral in France. What of it?

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @trelane

    "Matches lighted up"

    Replies: @trelane

  22. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Nantes is the center point of the majority of the world’s land. Perhaps they intend to start there and spiral outward.

    (NB: this videomaker’s example clips at times confuse symmetry with the Fibonacci sequence.)

    The geographic center of Africa is not that far from Rwanda. It’s not the same as the “pole of inaccesibility”, but is pretty inaccessible itself:

    Arriving at the Heart of Africa!

    Rwanda and her twin Burundi, though once Belgian colonies, are threatening to switch to the left-hand traffic of their neighbors. Maybe the arsonist just prefers to drive on the right, like the French? The old British colonies of West Africa, hemmed in by the old French ones, now drive on the right.

  23. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    “The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.”

    A friend who spent some time there recently told me that it’s not at all ordinary – at least by African standards. It’s competent.

    And just at the moment their not burning down their own cities.

  24. Hey, anyone know what would happen to me if I burned down a historically significant mosque in Saudi Arabia? I’m sure it would be worse, like fifteen years of guaranteed three hots and a cot, but the TV isn’t color? Something like that?


  25. I saw this at powerline today and it’s not OT.

    I’m surprised I haven’t seen it before.

    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @wren


    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.
     
    "Selected" can refer to the individual as well as the group. As with Caribbean blacks a century ago, these are the wealthiest, most competent, and most ambitious of their tribes-- for this generation. Regression will kick in.

    Also, consider that they almost all settle in big, prosperous cities which can easily explain their high incomes. There aren't that many in Bismarck or Boise or Bowling Green or Bristol or other places with lower wages (and lower costs) where a large portion of the white population still lives.

    Also also, a good chunk of that extra income goes for increased rent and security maintenance!

    Replies: @wren

    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    @wren

    Some ethnicities are more likely than generic Whites to live in a multi-generational extended households. Grandparents (how many of them on SSI?), children and grandchildren. That raises the average household income because there are more than one or two adults working.

    This was common in pre-WWII America, as well.

  26. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    .The French have a long history of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrophilia

    • Agree: Pop Warner
  27. Will France even be FRENCH in 30 yrs or…..mulatto i guess?

  28. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12212781/house-untouched-1948-owner-refuses-changes-decor/

    Something authentic about this old man.

    Reminds me of my grandmother’s old house……she still had her circa 1975 furniture up til about 3 to 4 yrs ago….

  29. @Just another serf
    Okay. One bad apple. Are we to ignore all the Rwandan engineers, doctors, researchers, architects, pilots and entrepreneurs sloshing around France?

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    “… sloshing about”?

    How about “hacking their way around France”?

  30. The arsonist was in a position of high trust. He had the keys to all the parish buildings. Apparently, somebody dissed him. Then he lit the fire.

  31. @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    "Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paint which set alight last week"

    Unaware that France had an actual Saint Paint. Was he the patron of brushes? Typo obviously intended for Sts' Peter and Paul.

    Replies: @Change that Matters

    SJWs employed in the MS Office Spell Check team have been quietly working on the Ethical Spell Checker©. After some initial confusion over bewitchment versus sequential lettering, the Crack Spell Check Blacks! (NB: includes whites and other non-Blacks!) have been hard at work erasing spell checker functions for white, Christian, privileged male words. In order to allay suspicions (until it’s too late to act), the rollout of ESP will be incremental. Full uptake is scheduled for mid-2021, by which time correct spelling with be redundant anyway.

  32. @anon
    @AnotherDad

    When are the French going to … get mad!

    Which French? The gilaut jaunes were protesting in the streets for close to a year. How did the French people in the French government choose to respond? What about the French people in the French media?

    Brecht may be laughing in his grave.

    Replies: @Huisache

    This metaphor is exhausted. Brecht is not doing anything. He is long dead.

  33. @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    They do get mad…….. a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by…… invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of “them.”

    Every time there’s a terrorist attack, you get the same response. “Support the troops.” “Win the war on terror!” “They hate us for a our freedom.”

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as “unpatriotic” and “sympathetic to the enemy.” For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been “shut and support the troops.” “Don’t question US foreign policy.” “The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us.”

    So I wouldn’t describe the U.S. (and its allies) as “weak” and “self-hating.” Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there’s something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There’s something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they’re getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don’t much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it’s because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never “we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims.” The response is never “we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants.” The response is ALWAYS “stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas.”

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The “far left” agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The “far right” agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It’s because both the “far left” and “far right” don’t fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as “extremists” by the Jewish megaphone. That’s why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who’s a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice “democracy.” America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue……… until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue……. until there’s a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they’ll b*tch about all the “Anti-Semitism” that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    • Agree: Pat Kittle
    • Replies: @ATBOTL
    @JohnnyWalker123


    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by…… invading Iraq.
     
    As someone who was a white nationalist for pretty much the whole 90's, I can tell you we thought that 9/11 would be a turning point where white Americans started to become racially conscious again. The opposite happened. White conservatives responded by rallying around the establishment. There was a distinct softening of attitudes towards both legal and illegal immigration. People complaining about immigration were seen as somehow unpatriotic, like they were bad mouthing Amurica. Bad mouthing the hard working Mexicuns who keep Amurica running. Distracting from the real issue, the terrorists who hate our Freedom!

    We didn't really see any winds blowing our way until the backlash to the Bush amnesty among conservatives around 2007.

    , @kaganovitch
    @JohnnyWalker123

    You left out Epstein. C'mon, you have to account for Epstein.

    , @IHTG
    @JohnnyWalker123

    It's not 2003 anymore. Move on, or you will be left behind.

    , @Inquiring Mind
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Where does that number "a million Iraqi civilians" come from?

    Precision munitions, lawfare, rules of engagement and all of that, how was it that the US forces were even able to kill that many civilians?

    For example, the US could have just flattened Fallujah, but instead, Marines were sacrificed by engaging in urban fighting to "take" that town, where the bulk of the population either sympathized with the combatant forces or were intimidated into supporting them.

    Are people counting deaths of Iraqi combatants? I suppose US soldiers are trained to shoot straight rather than "spray and pray", but something tells my the number of enemy combatants killed for the loss of each US warfighter couldn't anywhere near be that high. Think of the air war in Korea where 15 MiGs were once claimed for every UN loss, a number that was whittled down closer to an even exchange based on digging through Russian archives.

    By analogy, the Allied attack on Dresden was bad enough, but then you have that Irving guy inflating the numbers to serve an agenda of moral equivalency between Allied and Axis actions.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Art Deco

  34. Fire at the San Gabriel Mission reminds me that I saw a comment on a California paper where the writer says all the California cities and counties and rivers and mountaims named by the Spanish for saints should be changed and the missions leveled. See how that seed grows.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Buffalo Joe

    California jews have been working on that for decades. The 4th grade history curriculum teaches that the Missions were concentration camps where the Indians were enslaved, whipped , worked to death and injected with smallpox and measles germs just for fun.

    Few California jews have never been 20 miles from the Pacific coast or 60 miles north of San Francisco. Most LA and S California jews don’t believe red wood trees are all over S California. Because the trunks aren’t 6 ft diameter and they’re not 150 ft tall.

  35. Whether these best known of the glut of church-burnings recently were ideologically-motivated or were merely the work of the usual nuts, perhaps excited by the media-endorsed craziness of 2020, is unknown.

    Relax, everybody. I have it on good authority from a foreign, non-White Unz commenter in America, let’s call him Ding Dong, that the burning of Nantes Cathedral is highly unlikely to be due to widespread anti-White-civilization envy, shame, and animosity:

    The hyperbole is also a parochially American one in that it projects the views of a segment of the nonwhite population in U.S. on to the vast legions of nonwhites world-wide. I doubt the vast masses of the world think about the great achievements of the past 600 years, let alone be angry that their ancestors didn’t achieve those things.

    Mr. Sailer’s assertion here is merely another variation of ego self-stroking “The terrorists hate us Americans for our freedom” line of thinking, only this time it’s “They hate us whites, because our ancestors were so awesome.”

  36. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    In Western nations, citizens (through their taxes) pay for government benefits for foreigners.

    But in the middle-eastern kingdom of Dubai, the opposite is true: Foreign guest workers (through fees and taxes) pay for generous government benefits that are available only to citizens:
    – Government jobs – Retire at age 49 with a minimum pension of $2800 per month
    – Subsidized housing
    – Free healthcare

    90% of Dubai’s population are foreign guest workers:
    – No access to any government benefit
    – Deported if unemployed
    – Never allowed to become citizens

    In Dubai, almost all public-sector workers are citizens, and almost all private-sector workers are foreigners.

    Dubai has benefited greatly from importing millions of foreign guest workers from all over the world.

    But the foreign guest workers have also benefited greatly.
    A laborer who earns $60 per month in India can earn $300 per month in Dubai.

    Many laborers send $200 per month home to their families.
    $200 per month greatly improves the quality of life of a poor family in South Asia.

    Foreign guest workers enjoy other benefits:
    – Safe drinking water
    – Almost no crime
    – Different religions and ethnicities coexist peacefully

    Dubai, which has almost no oil, has created a revolutionary new approach to immigration:

    Dubai sells the right to live in Dubai to foreigners, then spends the revenue on generous benefits for Dubai’s citizens.

    Other nations could adopt Dubai’s profitable immigration policy.
    These nations could allow foreigners to live within their borders in exchange for a monthly fee.
    Foreigners could be confined to special economic zones.

    Also, entrepreneurs could create completely new nations and allow people to live in these new nations for a monthly fee.

    These new for-profit nations could earn enormous profits, while giving billions of migrants an opportunity to earn vastly higher salaries.

  37. @houston 1992
    @AnotherDad

    once he finishes prison, does he get to stay in France?
    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic, but ethnic resentments are thicker and more motivating than religious faith

    Replies: @Hibernian, @Alden

    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic..

    He could be, but that isn’t and shouldn’t be a condition for receiving aid from the Catholic Church. However, that aid should have been received in the first safe country, and don’t tell me it’s France. Rwanda is fairly far south in Africa and not that near either the east or the west coast. Might be in the Animist belt with some Christians; not sure who the original colonial power was.

  38. Why is he a refugee from Rwanda, which is now the best-run country in Africa?

  39. Rwandan refugee, 39 …

    I want to know if he was a Honda or a Tutu.

    • Replies: @Cato
    @James Speaks


    I want to know if he was a Honda or a Tutu.
     
    A TuTu:

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0c/82/40/0c8240fc6d91a541ed6d62f1a9aa628b.jpg

    Replies: @James Speaks

  40. @houston 1992
    @AnotherDad

    once he finishes prison, does he get to stay in France?
    I assume that he was a nominal Catholic, but ethnic resentments are thicker and more motivating than religious faith

    Replies: @Hibernian, @Alden

    I saw in freerepublic he’s a Muslim when he was first arrested.

    • Troll: Just another serf
  41. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.

    • Replies: @Gordo
    @anon


    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.
     
    But not the French. Its just the White Man's burden.

    Replies: @Sya Beerens

  42. NEVER FORGET!!

    Never forget (((who))) is masterminding White genocide:

    “Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies”:

    — (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G45WthPTo24)

    These Stone Age dindu’s are merely (((their))) pawns.

  43. @Colin Wright
    What's perhaps worth checking is how the various major news outlets treat the story.

    Replies: @Cato

    What’s perhaps worth checking is how the various major news outlets treat the story.

    Ehh? Major news outlets carrying this story? Where?

  44. @James Speaks

    Rwandan refugee, 39 ...

     

    I want to know if he was a Honda or a Tutu.

    Replies: @Cato

    I want to know if he was a Honda or a Tutu.

    A TuTu:

    • LOL: James Speaks
    • Replies: @James Speaks
    @Cato

    Some things cannot be unseen.

  45. @JohnnyWalker123
    @AnotherDad

    They do get mad........ a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by...... invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of "them."

    Every time there's a terrorist attack, you get the same response. "Support the troops." "Win the war on terror!" "They hate us for a our freedom."

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as "unpatriotic" and "sympathetic to the enemy." For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been "shut and support the troops." "Don't question US foreign policy." "The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us."

    So I wouldn't describe the U.S. (and its allies) as "weak" and "self-hating." Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there's something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There's something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they're getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don't much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it's because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never "we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims." The response is never "we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants." The response is ALWAYS "stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas."

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The "far left" agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The "far right" agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It's because both the "far left" and "far right" don't fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as "extremists" by the Jewish megaphone. That's why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who's a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice "democracy." America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue......... until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue....... until there's a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they'll b*tch about all the "Anti-Semitism" that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @kaganovitch, @IHTG, @Inquiring Mind

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by…… invading Iraq.

    As someone who was a white nationalist for pretty much the whole 90’s, I can tell you we thought that 9/11 would be a turning point where white Americans started to become racially conscious again. The opposite happened. White conservatives responded by rallying around the establishment. There was a distinct softening of attitudes towards both legal and illegal immigration. People complaining about immigration were seen as somehow unpatriotic, like they were bad mouthing Amurica. Bad mouthing the hard working Mexicuns who keep Amurica running. Distracting from the real issue, the terrorists who hate our Freedom!

    We didn’t really see any winds blowing our way until the backlash to the Bush amnesty among conservatives around 2007.

  46. Anonymous[344] • Disclaimer says:

    So Temple of the Golden Pavilion meets Camp of the Saints? This sounds like something the BAP and Hakan willed into existence.

  47. @JohnnyWalker123
    @AnotherDad

    They do get mad........ a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by...... invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of "them."

    Every time there's a terrorist attack, you get the same response. "Support the troops." "Win the war on terror!" "They hate us for a our freedom."

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as "unpatriotic" and "sympathetic to the enemy." For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been "shut and support the troops." "Don't question US foreign policy." "The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us."

    So I wouldn't describe the U.S. (and its allies) as "weak" and "self-hating." Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there's something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There's something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they're getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don't much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it's because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never "we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims." The response is never "we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants." The response is ALWAYS "stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas."

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The "far left" agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The "far right" agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It's because both the "far left" and "far right" don't fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as "extremists" by the Jewish megaphone. That's why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who's a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice "democracy." America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue......... until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue....... until there's a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they'll b*tch about all the "Anti-Semitism" that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @kaganovitch, @IHTG, @Inquiring Mind

    You left out Epstein. C’mon, you have to account for Epstein.

  48. There have been a few of these incidents of black asylum seekers destroying artifacts in Italian churches.

    There seems to be a very familiar pattern of African asylum seekers snapping and doing something violent in frustration. Fundamentally they treat asylum seeking like a form of normal immigration and get angry when they’re treated like asylum seekers and their plans fall through.

    You see this with the angry African men ‘rescued’ and placed in Italy. They get angry that they can’t just go to Britain or France or Germany or Sweden. Actually being treated like refugees is something they find deeply frustrating because they’re not refugees, they’re not seeking safety, they had safety, they want to emigrate to the Western country of their choosing.

    And when their applications occasionally get thrown out, some turn very violent. There is a bus line in rural Sweden that became notorious for men from the local asylum centre stabbing Swedes in ‘retribution’ for being denied asylum. I think it is the same centre that produced the Ikea stabber, but I can’t find the info right now.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_IKEA_stabbing_attack

    Perhaps there should be a word for it.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Altai

    "they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,"

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    Replies: @Gordo, @Sya Beerens, @Ray P, @Altai

    , @El Dato
    @Altai


    I think it is the same centre that produced the Ikea stabber, but I can’t find the info right now.
     
    Some say the Ikea Stabber is still lurking in Ikea stores, attacking unsuspecting customers (wearing hijab or not) who have become lost in the visitor-ensnaring IkeaMaze.
  49. @vinteuil
    David Hume, in his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals - without a doubt, one of the half dozen most important works in the history of ethical theory - includes "gratitude" in his list of words that "always [at all times, in all languages, in all cultures] express the highest merit that human nature can attain."

    Obviously, he never encountered a Rwandan.

    But, then, come to think of it, he did encounter Jean-Jacques Rousseau, at some length. So I guess this passage, like so many things in liberal ideology, represents the triumph of optimism over experience.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    Hume on race:

    I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but ’tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
    @Rob McX


    "I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    "In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but ’tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly."
     
    ...or, as Dr. Johnson put it, more wittily: "it's not that it's done well - it's that it's done at all."

    But, more seriously, these 64 words from Hume's otherwise mostly forgotten 1752 essay "Of National Characters" will be all it takes to consign him and all his works to the flames. One will no longer be allowed to discuss the problem of induction or the is/ought distinction or any of his many other still radical ideas without first slogging through a whole seminar on his casual & perfectly conventional [for his time] musings on race.

    What a world.

    Replies: @Old Palo Altan

  50. @Altai
    There have been a few of these incidents of black asylum seekers destroying artifacts in Italian churches.

    There seems to be a very familiar pattern of African asylum seekers snapping and doing something violent in frustration. Fundamentally they treat asylum seeking like a form of normal immigration and get angry when they're treated like asylum seekers and their plans fall through.

    You see this with the angry African men 'rescued' and placed in Italy. They get angry that they can't just go to Britain or France or Germany or Sweden. Actually being treated like refugees is something they find deeply frustrating because they're not refugees, they're not seeking safety, they had safety, they want to emigrate to the Western country of their choosing.

    And when their applications occasionally get thrown out, some turn very violent. There is a bus line in rural Sweden that became notorious for men from the local asylum centre stabbing Swedes in 'retribution' for being denied asylum. I think it is the same centre that produced the Ikea stabber, but I can't find the info right now.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_IKEA_stabbing_attack

    Perhaps there should be a word for it.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @El Dato

    “they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,”

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    • Replies: @Gordo
    @Steve Sailer


    “they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,”

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.
     
    To be fair a lot of the Rwandans now living in White countries were traumatised by committing genocide.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    , @Sya Beerens
    @Steve Sailer

    This is getting old and tiresome. Keep your wet dreams to yourself and start reading:

    https://www.academia.edu/40889636/European_External_Border_Management_and_its_Narratives_

    , @Ray P
    @Steve Sailer

    They're freebooters who want booty?

    The Catholic Church may not be the right place.

    , @Altai
    @Steve Sailer

    To them it's insane that the Europeans helping them seem to actually believe and act like they are refugees. Surely they're in on the joke they think, it's all a game, you speak the words to cheat the system, just like home! Also see the blurring of the terms 'migrant' and 'refugee'. During the million man Merkel march we also saw the Med boats from West Africa increase (The village boys from Nigeria were ironically putting themselves in the most mortal danger they ever faced by going on their sojourn) and media blurring the two.

    Rhetorically they all became Syrian children. But all represented people trying to take advantage of what they saw as leniency and weakness. Some of the scenes seemed like most of the people were Urdu. When I was in Denmark during the crisis I couldn't believe my eyes as a reporter was live covering the column that had gotten to Denmark (The happiest country on Earth with the lowest GINI coefficient of any developed country) and were continuing on into Sweden (Whose Green minister, Åsa Romson, had gone rogue and declared any 'Syrian' coming to Sweden would get indefinite right to stay and later openly broke down and cried during a press conference to announce the tightening of asylum laws after more than 100k people rushed the country in a few months) and I saw guys from the Balkans (Presumably to join the Albanian diaspora in Sweden who have made such vibrant contributions to the country as grenade attacks on police stations and brought automatic weapons to the local gangsters, entrepreneurial spirit!) in the crowd behind the reporter giving that 'Sicilian smile' to the camera. A worthy addition to Sweden those guys will be.

    And for anyone wondering, here is Ms Romson's finest hour proving this is a kind of pathological altruism madness.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8i6yIcylgU

    It brings to mind the young Sweden police woman who cried when she neeled before the BLM protestors (Whose signs were all in English, naturally) and cried when embraced by the other young female protestors.

    https://twitter.com/SamnyttSimon/status/1268266061801160711

    Meanwhile, on the same day, young Swedish male policemen.

    https://twitter.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1268276344158388224

    The sinews of the backlash are being pulled ever tauter.

  51. Whether these best known of the glut of church-burnings recently were ideologically-motivated or were merely the work of the usual nuts, perhaps excited by the media-endorsed craziness of 2020, is unknown.

    The distinction isn’t as clear as you suggest, in fact it’s irrelevant. For most non-white rioters, looters and arsonists, it’s just a matter of rage and envy. But it’s political anyway. Nothing is more political than race.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Rob McX

    Politics is downstream from culture (said Andrew Breitbart) and Antifa rioting and destruction is downstream from Democrat Party politics. Especially for getting their invisible man Biden elected.

  52. @anon
    @Art Deco

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.

    Replies: @Gordo

    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.

    But not the French. Its just the White Man’s burden.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
    @Gordo

    The Clintons (in this case) are a Brown man's burden just like the rest of your elected Predators

  53. @Steve Sailer
    @Altai

    "they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,"

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    Replies: @Gordo, @Sya Beerens, @Ray P, @Altai

    “they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,”

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    To be fair a lot of the Rwandans now living in White countries were traumatised by committing genocide.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Gordo

    Spare a thought for this poor guy.

  54. Anonymous[317] • Disclaimer says:

    Rwandans amply demonstrated to the world what sort of character they have back in 1995.

    Why would any intelligent well run nation wish to import such a people?

  55. @Steve Sailer
    @Altai

    "they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,"

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    Replies: @Gordo, @Sya Beerens, @Ray P, @Altai

    This is getting old and tiresome. Keep your wet dreams to yourself and start reading:

    https://www.academia.edu/40889636/European_External_Border_Management_and_its_Narratives_

  56. @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    “Why isn’t everybody getting mad? Why aren’t people going on a rampage at the sight of these aliens among us?” is basically the animating question at the center of far right politics. It’s something that ought to be examined directly rather than dancing around and assuming things will work out somehow if you cite enough hatefacts.

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
    @IHTG


    “Why isn’t everybody getting mad? Why aren’t people going on a rampage at the sight of these aliens among us?”
     
    Because there is something deeply wrong with the European peoples that keeps them from understanding and defending their group interests.
  57. @JohnnyWalker123
    @AnotherDad

    They do get mad........ a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by...... invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of "them."

    Every time there's a terrorist attack, you get the same response. "Support the troops." "Win the war on terror!" "They hate us for a our freedom."

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as "unpatriotic" and "sympathetic to the enemy." For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been "shut and support the troops." "Don't question US foreign policy." "The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us."

    So I wouldn't describe the U.S. (and its allies) as "weak" and "self-hating." Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there's something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There's something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they're getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don't much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it's because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never "we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims." The response is never "we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants." The response is ALWAYS "stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas."

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The "far left" agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The "far right" agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It's because both the "far left" and "far right" don't fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as "extremists" by the Jewish megaphone. That's why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who's a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice "democracy." America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue......... until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue....... until there's a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they'll b*tch about all the "Anti-Semitism" that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @kaganovitch, @IHTG, @Inquiring Mind

    It’s not 2003 anymore. Move on, or you will be left behind.

  58. France has nothing to do with Rwanda. Germany did, and I am sure it was a very light colonization and ineffective.

    Rwanda – Rwanda under German and Belgian control | Britannica
    https://www.britannica.com/place/Rwanda/Rwanda…
    Rwanda under German and Belgian control. From 1894 to 1918, Rwanda, along with Burundi, was part of German East Africa. After Belgium became the administering authority under the mandates system of the League of Nations, Rwanda and Burundi formed a single administrative entity; they continued to be jointly administered as the Territory of Ruanda-Urundi until the end of the Belgian trusteeship in 1962.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Clyde

    Germany was pretty gut.

    They even had to apologize for some massacre of rebellious Namibians

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide


    Between 24,000 and 100,000 Hereros, 10,000 Nama and an unknown number of San died in the genocide.
     
    That's a serious error bar and definitely not a genocide, but surely "ultrakill". Also based on British Imperial sources post-WWI who knows what really happened.

    Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

  59. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    The French are quite simply resigned to their own extinction. They won’t say it quite so plainly, but it’s true. One of their leading intellectuals, Michel Onfray, says Europe is decadent and Muslims are not, and he detests Catholicism and rather enjoys decadence, and so the situation is hopeless, et voilà c’est tout. Revolting.

  60. @Rob McX

    Whether these best known of the glut of church-burnings recently were ideologically-motivated or were merely the work of the usual nuts, perhaps excited by the media-endorsed craziness of 2020, is unknown.
     
    The distinction isn't as clear as you suggest, in fact it's irrelevant. For most non-white rioters, looters and arsonists, it's just a matter of rage and envy. But it's political anyway. Nothing is more political than race.

    Replies: @Clyde

    Politics is downstream from culture (said Andrew Breitbart) and Antifa rioting and destruction is downstream from Democrat Party politics. Especially for getting their invisible man Biden elected.

  61. We were in the neighbourhood of Auxerre this weekend, and I told my wife we needed to see the Cathedral there before the vibrant newcomers decided to renovate it.

  62. @Gordo
    @Steve Sailer


    “they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,”

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.
     
    To be fair a lot of the Rwandans now living in White countries were traumatised by committing genocide.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    Spare a thought for this poor guy.

  63. @No Recent Commenting History
    Diversity is strength. Arresting an African for arson is racism. Read Leonard Pitts. Ask Coronoavinus.

    Replies: @Old Prude

    You forgot “white women dig black imigrents”.

    • Disagree: throtler
  64. @wren
    https://i.postimg.cc/wBK5mJHT/Houehold-income-by-ethnic-group.jpg

    I saw this at powerline today and it's not OT.

    I'm surprised I haven't seen it before.

    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Ris_Eruwaedhiel

    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.

    “Selected” can refer to the individual as well as the group. As with Caribbean blacks a century ago, these are the wealthiest, most competent, and most ambitious of their tribes– for this generation. Regression will kick in.

    Also, consider that they almost all settle in big, prosperous cities which can easily explain their high incomes. There aren’t that many in Bismarck or Boise or Bowling Green or Bristol or other places with lower wages (and lower costs) where a large portion of the white population still lives.

    Also also, a good chunk of that extra income goes for increased rent and security maintenance!

    • Replies: @wren
    @Reg Cæsar

    That may all be true, but I think the data shows that "systemic racism" is not working very well if all those groups, including many from Africa, can do so much better than average whites in America.

    If there is "systemic racism," it clearly doesn't support white people, from that census data.

  65. @Steve Sailer
    @Altai

    "they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,"

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    Replies: @Gordo, @Sya Beerens, @Ray P, @Altai

    They’re freebooters who want booty?

    The Catholic Church may not be the right place.

  66. @IHTG
    @AnotherDad

    "Why isn't everybody getting mad? Why aren't people going on a rampage at the sight of these aliens among us?" is basically the animating question at the center of far right politics. It's something that ought to be examined directly rather than dancing around and assuming things will work out somehow if you cite enough hatefacts.

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard

    “Why isn’t everybody getting mad? Why aren’t people going on a rampage at the sight of these aliens among us?”

    Because there is something deeply wrong with the European peoples that keeps them from understanding and defending their group interests.

  67. @JohnnyWalker123
    @AnotherDad

    They do get mad........ a lot.

    Then their anger is channeled into supporting more wars overseas, in support of defense contractors and Israeli national security.

    For example, American (and various Western allies) responded to 9/11 by...... invading Iraq. We ended up killing over a million Iraqi civilians, with the public totally disinterested in the huge number of civilian casualties. So the public got mad and supported a mass-scale genocide overseas. In response to 3,000 Americans getting killed, we killed 1+ million of "them."

    Every time there's a terrorist attack, you get the same response. "Support the troops." "Win the war on terror!" "They hate us for a our freedom."

    If you suggest that perhaps the U.S. should change its foreign policy, you get denounced as "unpatriotic" and "sympathetic to the enemy." For the last couple decades, anyone who advocated a diplomatic approach to terrorism was slurred by militaristic right-wing demagogues.

    The message to the general public has always been "shut and support the troops." "Don't question US foreign policy." "The terrorists are evil and hate freedom, this is why they want to kill us."

    So I wouldn't describe the U.S. (and its allies) as "weak" and "self-hating." Western leaders are quite bloodthirsty, often excessively so.

    However, with all that being said, there's something interesting to consider.

    Who wins as a result of all these wars?

    The answer is this. 2 groups.

    1. Defense contractors have become extremely rich in the process, and have spread the wealth around to many members of the ruling class.
    2. Israel.

    There's something else that needs to be considered. Who loses?

    1. Muslims who end up getting slaughtered, widowed, orphaned, or displaced by the US war machine.
    2. America (and to a somewhat lesser extent other Western allies), which has exhausted itself in the Middle East. Over $5 trillion spent in Iraq alone. Over 1 million soldiers injured. Around 10,000 Americans killed.

    So why does this insane arrangement even exist?

    Partly because our leaders are venal, disinterested in the welfare of their countrymen, disinterested in the welfare of foreigners, and totally incompetent. So they like that they're getting rich from all our defense-related boondoggles and don't much care if people are getting maimed.

    More than that, it's because the West is run by Jewish Neoconservatives. They control foreign policy, media, politicians, entertainment industry, etc. They have their hands on the levers of power, and therefore control the discourse.

    Their are 2 aspects to the Jewish agenda.

    1. Send Western troops to pummel the Muslims into submission, which benefits Israeli security interests.
    2. Bring in huge numbers of foreigners to make White Gentiles into minorities in their own homelands.

    So every time Muslim migrants commit a terrorist attack (often in response to Western military action in their homelands), the response is never "we should change our militaristic foreign policy to appease Muslims." The response is never "we should cut Muslim immigration and repatriate Muslim migrants." The response is ALWAYS "stand with our Muslim immigrant community and support our troops overseas."

    None of this makes sense, until you consider that Jews run the West. Then everything makes sense. Also, when you remember that White Gentile elites are often being enriched financially by the defense spending, their motives become more clear.

    The "far left" agenda (ending foreign wars in the Middle East) is never taken seriously. The "far right" agenda (stopping Muslim migration) is never taken seriously either. Why?

    It's because both the "far left" and "far right" don't fit in with the Jewish agenda. So both sides are portrayed as "extremists" by the Jewish megaphone. That's why even leftist types like Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich get marginalized by the political/media elites. Even Bernie Sanders (who's a Jew whose politics are consistently pure left) encountered hostility from the elites.

    America (and the other Western countries) does not practice "democracy." America practices a system that fuses oligarchy with Judeocracy.

    So the wars will continue......... until American goes bankrupt.
    The immigration will also continue....... until there's a complete breakdown in civil order in Europe.

    At that point, the Jews will flee to Israel (or wherever else is good at the moment). Then they'll b*tch about all the "Anti-Semitism" that they encountered back in the U.S. and EU.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @kaganovitch, @IHTG, @Inquiring Mind

    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

    Precision munitions, lawfare, rules of engagement and all of that, how was it that the US forces were even able to kill that many civilians?

    For example, the US could have just flattened Fallujah, but instead, Marines were sacrificed by engaging in urban fighting to “take” that town, where the bulk of the population either sympathized with the combatant forces or were intimidated into supporting them.

    Are people counting deaths of Iraqi combatants? I suppose US soldiers are trained to shoot straight rather than “spray and pray”, but something tells my the number of enemy combatants killed for the loss of each US warfighter couldn’t anywhere near be that high. Think of the air war in Korea where 15 MiGs were once claimed for every UN loss, a number that was whittled down closer to an even exchange based on digging through Russian archives.

    By analogy, the Allied attack on Dresden was bad enough, but then you have that Irving guy inflating the numbers to serve an agenda of moral equivalency between Allied and Axis actions.

    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    @Inquiring Mind


    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

     

    https://www.unz.com/emargolis/send-our-war-criminals-to-the-hague-court/

    Lancet study from 2006.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/11/iraq.iraq

    Thus they calculate that 654,965 Iraqis have died as a consequence of the invasion. It is an estimate and the mid-point, and most likely of a range of numbers that could also be correct in the context of their statistical analysis. But even the lowest number in the range - 392,979 - is higher that anyone else has suggested. Of the deaths, 31% were ascribed to the US-led forces. Most deaths were from gunshot wounds (56%), with a further 13% from car bomb injuries and 14% the result of other explosions.

     

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-deaths-survey/iraq-conflict-has-killed-a-million-iraqis-survey-idUSL3048857920080130

    The survey, conducted by Opinion Research Business (ORB) with 2,414 adults in face-to-face interviews, found that 20 percent of people had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, rather than natural causes.

    The last complete census in Iraq conducted in 1997 found 4.05 million households in the country, a figure ORB used to calculate that approximately 1.03 million people had died as a result of the war, the researchers found.

    The margin of error in the survey, conducted in August and September 2007, was 1.7 percent, giving a range of deaths of 946,258 to 1.12 million.

     

    Replies: @JMcG

    , @Art Deco
    @Inquiring Mind

    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

    Out of his rectum. The people who actually count these deaths put the number at around 200,000, of whom about 15% were killed by coalition forces.

  68. @wren
    https://i.postimg.cc/wBK5mJHT/Houehold-income-by-ethnic-group.jpg

    I saw this at powerline today and it's not OT.

    I'm surprised I haven't seen it before.

    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Ris_Eruwaedhiel

    Some ethnicities are more likely than generic Whites to live in a multi-generational extended households. Grandparents (how many of them on SSI?), children and grandchildren. That raises the average household income because there are more than one or two adults working.

    This was common in pre-WWII America, as well.

  69. @AnotherDad
    When are the French going to ... get mad!


    But then again you can ask the same question of the Brits, the Germans, the Swedes, the Italians, the Danes, the Spanish ... of Americans.

    Replies: @anon, @houston 1992, @ATBOTL, @JohnnyWalker123, @IHTG, @John Pepple

    Maybe the Greeks are starting to get mad, now that Hagia Sophia has been turned into a mosque.

  70. @Gordo
    @anon


    Why is he billeted in France?

    Because once some people did something in Rwanda.
     
    But not the French. Its just the White Man's burden.

    Replies: @Sya Beerens

    The Clintons (in this case) are a Brown man’s burden just like the rest of your elected Predators

  71. Anon[320] • Disclaimer says:

    A “refugee” the church brought in burned down the church. That should teach them. But Jesus tells us to turn the other cheek, right? That means if they burn down your church, let them also burn down your house, or something.

    His identity has not been released.

    That usually means they’re black.

  72. @ATBOTL
    @AnotherDad

    What are you talking about? France has the largest nationalist movement in the West. It has the highest percentage of the population opposing globalization of any Western country. They are fighting back. A poll from early this year had Macron at 55% and LePen at 45% for the next election. That was before the latest madness. LePen received over 60% of the under 25 vote in the last election.

    Worry about America, this is the only white country with no organized pro-white political activity.

    Replies: @Diversity Heretic

    I live in France and I wish I could share your optimism. I haven’t see the poll you cite (the ones I’ve seen indicate that Marine Le Pen generally tops out at about 40%) but there is simply no way Marine Le Pen will be the next president of France. Most of the momentum at the moment is for the EELV (environmental) Party, which won some major mayoral contests (e.g., Bordeaux). The EELV are firmly pro-invader. All of the other parties will unite to keep the RN out of power and the French electoral system gives them only a few seats in the National Assembly. And the demographicc situation in France may make an RN victory impossible by 2027. So yes, France does have an anti-invader party, but it’s electoral prospects are dim.

    With all its drawbacks, I do think that the situation in France is better than that in the U.S. (one reason I chose to live here) partly because of the existence of the RN.

  73. @Reg Cæsar
    @wren


    Several real African American nationalities do better than whites in the US.
     
    "Selected" can refer to the individual as well as the group. As with Caribbean blacks a century ago, these are the wealthiest, most competent, and most ambitious of their tribes-- for this generation. Regression will kick in.

    Also, consider that they almost all settle in big, prosperous cities which can easily explain their high incomes. There aren't that many in Bismarck or Boise or Bowling Green or Bristol or other places with lower wages (and lower costs) where a large portion of the white population still lives.

    Also also, a good chunk of that extra income goes for increased rent and security maintenance!

    Replies: @wren

    That may all be true, but I think the data shows that “systemic racism” is not working very well if all those groups, including many from Africa, can do so much better than average whites in America.

    If there is “systemic racism,” it clearly doesn’t support white people, from that census data.

  74. @Altai
    There have been a few of these incidents of black asylum seekers destroying artifacts in Italian churches.

    There seems to be a very familiar pattern of African asylum seekers snapping and doing something violent in frustration. Fundamentally they treat asylum seeking like a form of normal immigration and get angry when they're treated like asylum seekers and their plans fall through.

    You see this with the angry African men 'rescued' and placed in Italy. They get angry that they can't just go to Britain or France or Germany or Sweden. Actually being treated like refugees is something they find deeply frustrating because they're not refugees, they're not seeking safety, they had safety, they want to emigrate to the Western country of their choosing.

    And when their applications occasionally get thrown out, some turn very violent. There is a bus line in rural Sweden that became notorious for men from the local asylum centre stabbing Swedes in 'retribution' for being denied asylum. I think it is the same centre that produced the Ikea stabber, but I can't find the info right now.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_IKEA_stabbing_attack

    Perhaps there should be a word for it.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @El Dato

    I think it is the same centre that produced the Ikea stabber, but I can’t find the info right now.

    Some say the Ikea Stabber is still lurking in Ikea stores, attacking unsuspecting customers (wearing hijab or not) who have become lost in the visitor-ensnaring IkeaMaze.

  75. @Clyde
    France has nothing to do with Rwanda. Germany did, and I am sure it was a very light colonization and ineffective.

    Rwanda - Rwanda under German and Belgian control | Britannica
    https://www.britannica.com/place/Rwanda/Rwanda...
    Rwanda under German and Belgian control. From 1894 to 1918, Rwanda, along with Burundi, was part of German East Africa. After Belgium became the administering authority under the mandates system of the League of Nations, Rwanda and Burundi formed a single administrative entity; they continued to be jointly administered as the Territory of Ruanda-Urundi until the end of the Belgian trusteeship in 1962.

    Replies: @El Dato

    Germany was pretty gut.

    They even had to apologize for some massacre of rebellious Namibians

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide

    Between 24,000 and 100,000 Hereros, 10,000 Nama and an unknown number of San died in the genocide.

    That’s a serious error bar and definitely not a genocide, but surely “ultrakill”. Also based on British Imperial sources post-WWI who knows what really happened.

    • Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    @El Dato

    LOL. All British Imperial atrocity claims during and after WW1 are complete lies.

  76. @Anonymous
    Now I have the Beastie Boys “Gratitude” song stuck in my head. Oh well, at least I’m “anonymous”

    Replies: @stillCARealist

    The terms “Beastie Boys” and “song” don’t belong in the same sentence.

  77. @Rob McX
    @vinteuil

    Hume on race:


    I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but 'tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly.
     

    Replies: @vinteuil

    “I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    “In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but ’tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly.”

    …or, as Dr. Johnson put it, more wittily: “it’s not that it’s done well – it’s that it’s done at all.”

    But, more seriously, these 64 words from Hume’s otherwise mostly forgotten 1752 essay “Of National Characters” will be all it takes to consign him and all his works to the flames. One will no longer be allowed to discuss the problem of induction or the is/ought distinction or any of his many other still radical ideas without first slogging through a whole seminar on his casual & perfectly conventional [for his time] musings on race.

    What a world.

    • Replies: @Old Palo Altan
    @vinteuil

    But, thank God, a world which will not exist for long.

    Once the damage has been done, and Western civilisation is totally destroyed, those who take over, be they Jews or Chinamen, will restore the natural hierarchy of being and the blacks will be back at the bottom, if they are allowed to continue to exist at all.

  78. @trelane
    It's probably just a big misunderstanding. A young, inexperienced volunteer security guard had some matches that set alight a fire at a cathedral in France. What of it?

    Replies: @El Dato

    “Matches lighted up”

    • Replies: @trelane
    @El Dato

    The church was burned by the fiery flames of the struck match held in the brown hands of the Refugee from Rwanda.

  79. @El Dato
    @Clyde

    Germany was pretty gut.

    They even had to apologize for some massacre of rebellious Namibians

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide


    Between 24,000 and 100,000 Hereros, 10,000 Nama and an unknown number of San died in the genocide.
     
    That's a serious error bar and definitely not a genocide, but surely "ultrakill". Also based on British Imperial sources post-WWI who knows what really happened.

    Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    LOL. All British Imperial atrocity claims during and after WW1 are complete lies.

  80. @Inquiring Mind
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Where does that number "a million Iraqi civilians" come from?

    Precision munitions, lawfare, rules of engagement and all of that, how was it that the US forces were even able to kill that many civilians?

    For example, the US could have just flattened Fallujah, but instead, Marines were sacrificed by engaging in urban fighting to "take" that town, where the bulk of the population either sympathized with the combatant forces or were intimidated into supporting them.

    Are people counting deaths of Iraqi combatants? I suppose US soldiers are trained to shoot straight rather than "spray and pray", but something tells my the number of enemy combatants killed for the loss of each US warfighter couldn't anywhere near be that high. Think of the air war in Korea where 15 MiGs were once claimed for every UN loss, a number that was whittled down closer to an even exchange based on digging through Russian archives.

    By analogy, the Allied attack on Dresden was bad enough, but then you have that Irving guy inflating the numbers to serve an agenda of moral equivalency between Allied and Axis actions.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Art Deco

    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

    https://www.unz.com/emargolis/send-our-war-criminals-to-the-hague-court/

    Lancet study from 2006.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/11/iraq.iraq

    Thus they calculate that 654,965 Iraqis have died as a consequence of the invasion. It is an estimate and the mid-point, and most likely of a range of numbers that could also be correct in the context of their statistical analysis. But even the lowest number in the range – 392,979 – is higher that anyone else has suggested. Of the deaths, 31% were ascribed to the US-led forces. Most deaths were from gunshot wounds (56%), with a further 13% from car bomb injuries and 14% the result of other explosions.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-deaths-survey/iraq-conflict-has-killed-a-million-iraqis-survey-idUSL3048857920080130

    The survey, conducted by Opinion Research Business (ORB) with 2,414 adults in face-to-face interviews, found that 20 percent of people had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, rather than natural causes.

    The last complete census in Iraq conducted in 1997 found 4.05 million households in the country, a figure ORB used to calculate that approximately 1.03 million people had died as a result of the war, the researchers found.

    The margin of error in the survey, conducted in August and September 2007, was 1.7 percent, giving a range of deaths of 946,258 to 1.12 million.

    • Replies: @JMcG
    @JohnnyWalker123

    25% of a population has never died in war anywhere at anytime. I mean the population of a nation, not a city-state.

  81. @Art Deco
    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you'd have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well. You'd have to pass seven other countries. Why is he billeted in France?

    2. Why does it take French tribunals five years to not finish processing a claim?

    3. The Civil War in Rwanda ended 25 years ago., when this man was about 14 years old. From what or whom is he a refugee? The current government of Rwanda is an ordinary authoritarian regime.


    Maybe he's not grateful because he's a con man.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Reg Cæsar, @dearieme, @Ian Smith, @Pittsburgh Thatcherite, @anon, @Tono Bungay, @anon

    1. Were you to travel overland from Rwanda to Nantes, you’d have to spend about 9 waking days driving, and require a ferry ride as well.

    Not if Jeff Epstein provided a ride in his jet. Johnny123 will be on that soon.

  82. Hilarious! The Diocese got what they deserve; ie, for treason. You see, a White man would never have done that. Race runs bone deep. Miscegenation is wrong, and dangerous. People prefer their own kind. America is falling apart.

  83. @El Dato
    @trelane

    "Matches lighted up"

    Replies: @trelane

    The church was burned by the fiery flames of the struck match held in the brown hands of the Refugee from Rwanda.

  84. How about drawing and quartering streamed live?

  85. @JohnnyWalker123
    @Inquiring Mind


    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

     

    https://www.unz.com/emargolis/send-our-war-criminals-to-the-hague-court/

    Lancet study from 2006.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/11/iraq.iraq

    Thus they calculate that 654,965 Iraqis have died as a consequence of the invasion. It is an estimate and the mid-point, and most likely of a range of numbers that could also be correct in the context of their statistical analysis. But even the lowest number in the range - 392,979 - is higher that anyone else has suggested. Of the deaths, 31% were ascribed to the US-led forces. Most deaths were from gunshot wounds (56%), with a further 13% from car bomb injuries and 14% the result of other explosions.

     

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-deaths-survey/iraq-conflict-has-killed-a-million-iraqis-survey-idUSL3048857920080130

    The survey, conducted by Opinion Research Business (ORB) with 2,414 adults in face-to-face interviews, found that 20 percent of people had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, rather than natural causes.

    The last complete census in Iraq conducted in 1997 found 4.05 million households in the country, a figure ORB used to calculate that approximately 1.03 million people had died as a result of the war, the researchers found.

    The margin of error in the survey, conducted in August and September 2007, was 1.7 percent, giving a range of deaths of 946,258 to 1.12 million.

     

    Replies: @JMcG

    25% of a population has never died in war anywhere at anytime. I mean the population of a nation, not a city-state.

  86. @Inquiring Mind
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Where does that number "a million Iraqi civilians" come from?

    Precision munitions, lawfare, rules of engagement and all of that, how was it that the US forces were even able to kill that many civilians?

    For example, the US could have just flattened Fallujah, but instead, Marines were sacrificed by engaging in urban fighting to "take" that town, where the bulk of the population either sympathized with the combatant forces or were intimidated into supporting them.

    Are people counting deaths of Iraqi combatants? I suppose US soldiers are trained to shoot straight rather than "spray and pray", but something tells my the number of enemy combatants killed for the loss of each US warfighter couldn't anywhere near be that high. Think of the air war in Korea where 15 MiGs were once claimed for every UN loss, a number that was whittled down closer to an even exchange based on digging through Russian archives.

    By analogy, the Allied attack on Dresden was bad enough, but then you have that Irving guy inflating the numbers to serve an agenda of moral equivalency between Allied and Axis actions.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Art Deco

    Where does that number “a million Iraqi civilians” come from?

    Out of his rectum. The people who actually count these deaths put the number at around 200,000, of whom about 15% were killed by coalition forces.

  87. This is the Results of Open Borders and the Welcome Refugees crowds of fools

  88. @Steve Sailer
    @Altai

    "they’re not seeking safety, they had safety,"

    They see themselves, not ridiculously, as being adventurers who have chosen to go on an adventure. They made it across the Mediterranean, so they should be rewarded with European women.

    Replies: @Gordo, @Sya Beerens, @Ray P, @Altai

    To them it’s insane that the Europeans helping them seem to actually believe and act like they are refugees. Surely they’re in on the joke they think, it’s all a game, you speak the words to cheat the system, just like home! Also see the blurring of the terms ‘migrant’ and ‘refugee’. During the million man Merkel march we also saw the Med boats from West Africa increase (The village boys from Nigeria were ironically putting themselves in the most mortal danger they ever faced by going on their sojourn) and media blurring the two.

    Rhetorically they all became Syrian children. But all represented people trying to take advantage of what they saw as leniency and weakness. Some of the scenes seemed like most of the people were Urdu. When I was in Denmark during the crisis I couldn’t believe my eyes as a reporter was live covering the column that had gotten to Denmark (The happiest country on Earth with the lowest GINI coefficient of any developed country) and were continuing on into Sweden (Whose Green minister, Åsa Romson, had gone rogue and declared any ‘Syrian’ coming to Sweden would get indefinite right to stay and later openly broke down and cried during a press conference to announce the tightening of asylum laws after more than 100k people rushed the country in a few months) and I saw guys from the Balkans (Presumably to join the Albanian diaspora in Sweden who have made such vibrant contributions to the country as grenade attacks on police stations and brought automatic weapons to the local gangsters, entrepreneurial spirit!) in the crowd behind the reporter giving that ‘Sicilian smile’ to the camera. A worthy addition to Sweden those guys will be.

    And for anyone wondering, here is Ms Romson’s finest hour proving this is a kind of pathological altruism madness.

    It brings to mind the young Sweden police woman who cried when she neeled before the BLM protestors (Whose signs were all in English, naturally) and cried when embraced by the other young female protestors.

    Meanwhile, on the same day, young Swedish male policemen.

    The sinews of the backlash are being pulled ever tauter.

  89. @Cato
    @James Speaks


    I want to know if he was a Honda or a Tutu.
     
    A TuTu:

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0c/82/40/0c8240fc6d91a541ed6d62f1a9aa628b.jpg

    Replies: @James Speaks

    Some things cannot be unseen.

  90. @Buffalo Joe
    Fire at the San Gabriel Mission reminds me that I saw a comment on a California paper where the writer says all the California cities and counties and rivers and mountaims named by the Spanish for saints should be changed and the missions leveled. See how that seed grows.

    Replies: @Alden

    California jews have been working on that for decades. The 4th grade history curriculum teaches that the Missions were concentration camps where the Indians were enslaved, whipped , worked to death and injected with smallpox and measles germs just for fun.

    Few California jews have never been 20 miles from the Pacific coast or 60 miles north of San Francisco. Most LA and S California jews don’t believe red wood trees are all over S California. Because the trunks aren’t 6 ft diameter and they’re not 150 ft tall.

  91. @vinteuil
    @Rob McX


    "I am apt to suspect the Negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.

    "In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but ’tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly."
     
    ...or, as Dr. Johnson put it, more wittily: "it's not that it's done well - it's that it's done at all."

    But, more seriously, these 64 words from Hume's otherwise mostly forgotten 1752 essay "Of National Characters" will be all it takes to consign him and all his works to the flames. One will no longer be allowed to discuss the problem of induction or the is/ought distinction or any of his many other still radical ideas without first slogging through a whole seminar on his casual & perfectly conventional [for his time] musings on race.

    What a world.

    Replies: @Old Palo Altan

    But, thank God, a world which will not exist for long.

    Once the damage has been done, and Western civilisation is totally destroyed, those who take over, be they Jews or Chinamen, will restore the natural hierarchy of being and the blacks will be back at the bottom, if they are allowed to continue to exist at all.

  92. But, thank God, a world which will not exist for long.

    OPA, I am so tempted by that black pill, just now.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS