The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Feds: In 2018, Blacks Violently Victimized Asians 275+ Times as Often as Asians Violently Victimized Blacks
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As well as collecting crime statistics from local law enforcement agencies, the federal government’s National Crime Victimization Survey annually interviews 160,000 individuals about their experience, if any, with being the victim of a crime over the last year.

One of the more astonishing results in recent years has been that in 2018, black victims of “violent incidents” reported in the survey that less than 0.1% of their victimizers were Asian. In contrast, Asian victims of violent incidents reported that 27.5% of their victimizers were black, for a black-Asian interracial violence ratio of over 275 to one.

From the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ publication Criminal Victimization, 2018:

Criminal Victimization, 2018
Bureau of Justice Statistics
Rachel E. Morgan and Barbara A. Oudekerk
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf
Offender race/ethnicity
Victim race/ethnicity Number of violent incidents Total White Black Hispanic Asian Other Multiple offenders of various races
White 3,581,360 100% 62.1% 15.3% 10.2% 2.6% 8.1% 2.1%
Black 563,940 100% 10.6% 70.3% 7.9% 0.1% 9.3% 1.9%
Hispanic 734,410 100% 28.2% 15.3% 45.4% 0.6% 7.4% 3.0%
Asian 182,230 100% 24.1% 27.5% 7.0% 24.1% 14.4% 2.9%

Note that the BJS warned that the cell showing that less than 0.1% of victimizers of blacks were reported by blacks to be Asian:

! Interpret with caution. Estimate is based on 10 or fewer sample cases, or coefficient of variation is greater than 50%.

If you don’t believe me, here’s the screenshot:

For the next report, last month’s Criminal Victimization, 2019, the feds solved their small sample size / embarrasing results problem by simply dropping Asians from the left-handed column of victims:

Problem solved!

What you don’t know, can’t hurt you. Well, actually, ignorance can hurt you when we are talking about your likelihood of violent victimization. But that’s not the point, the point is that the highest priority of the federal government must be to make Ibram X. Kendi’s career smoother for him by suppressing all inconvenient knowledge.

https://twitter.com/LantShift/status/1320543360436895744

https://twitter.com/TPAgartha/status/1320552662547484673

In 2020, when nonblacks are victimized by black criminals, the nonblacks feel they must preemptively apologize for having been violently attacked by a stereotypical black thug. After all, they feel guilty about contributing to Stereotype Threat.

Has anybody studied the effect on the mental health of crime victims of the Racial Reckoning?

 
Hide 122 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Give it a few years, there will be such minimal Asian-Black contact that this stat evens out.

    So if people want to make a big deal about something bad happening to Asians because they are afraid to talk about bad things happening to whites, better get your pathetic licks in now while you can.

    • Agree: Alden
  2. The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
    @Morton's toes

    Why would they use domestic Chinese when whites like myself would happily sacrifice their life for Chinese dominance of the United States?

    , @ThisIsAnon153Replying
    @Morton's toes

    I've been noticing this too. Half the people at the range now seem to be chinks. And they look like fobs. They're very good shots. They're also not obese chain smoking boomers like 60% of the white guys at the range.

    Could be sleeper cells. Or, they might legitimately like guns, I talked to a few Chinese people who said it would be unheard of for them to own a gun in China and were into shooting here.

    , @Hapalong Cassidy
    @Morton's toes

    How do you know they were Chinese? Korean shop owners like to be heavily armed.

    , @Astuteobservor II
    @Morton's toes

    I talked to my local Chinese takeout owner. He was scared of the blm riots. So he loaded up on guns and ammo. Even though the town he was living in was 99% white.

    And it wasn't just him, he told me the Chinese in the USA communicate and keep each other up to date on wechat. Most of the Chinese he knows are all stocking up on guns and ammos.

    I am 100% sure if blacks attempt home invasions on them will get shot at. Their most watched video is of a Asian lady shooting 3 home invaders. She killed one out of the 3.

    Replies: @right wing Jew

    , @SunBakedSuburb
    @Morton's toes

    "the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed"

    The Chinese acquired ownership of the Democratic Party beginning with the Clintons, Diane Feinstein, and Max Baucus. Eight years of Obama/Holder transformed the FBI into an American NKVD. It would not be shocking if the FBI was running cover for CCP spies whilst chasing down those dangerous white nationalists who targeted Gretchen Whitmer; a lady who is perfectly sane and definitely not creepy.

  3. Honestly I’m shocked it’s not an infinite ratio. Must include gang violence. I hear Vietnamese gangs sometimes run afoul of black gangs.

    • Replies: @MikeJa
    @Anon

    I'm guessing the 276th incidents are mostly well-justified retaliation

  4. Asians in Amurika aren’t “gun nuts”.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    I’ve met a few in Texas that really enjoyed the Cowboy persona.

    https://www.afr.com/content/dam/images/g/v/f/t/v/j/image.related.afrArticleLead.620x350.h12p5d.png/1531646990803.jpg

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Bozo the Clown
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Growing up in Chicago, the first two gun nuts I ever met were one Vietnamese (who loved America/hated commies) and one half-Japanese fella.

  5. And yet hordes of younger Asians have come to love the Numinous Negro and to hate in the name of and for the benefit of the Numinous Negro.

    Asians have asssimilated to WASP Elite cultural values.

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
    • Replies: @njguy73
    @Jake

    Have you seen this? Got any links to share?

    , @Curle
    @Jake

    “And yet hordes of younger Asians have come to love the Numinous Negro”

    Seems to me they avoid them like the plague. And vice-versa.

  6. Blacks violently victimize every race, including their own race.

  7. I’m surprised Asian Triads, Tongs, Yakuza don’t kill more blacks.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    @Trelane

    Maybe they are using blackface to stay unrecognized?

    , @TWS
    @Trelane

    Their violence is directed inward.

  8. Yeah but how many times have Asian convenience store owners overcharged (by overcharged, I mean required payment) negroes for Black N Mild cigars?

    • LOL: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Polistra
    @Mike Tre

    And even when we do try to pay, they refuse to break our Benjamins. Racist!

  9. Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn’t that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    • Replies: @anon
    @Sam Helix


    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites
     
    .


    Possible that all those crackers pouring in from MENA and the Caucasus are making a difference. White ain’t what it used to be.

    Or white on black violence numbers might be boosted by blacks, especially black women, reporting smirks and other microaggressions as violent incidents.
    , @Travis
    @Sam Helix

    good point...but it could be that Blacks identify their Hispanic assailants as white more often.

    We cannot trust the Feds. They continue to hide and distort the statistics. Why would they eliminate the Asian category ? There are 20 million Asians in the United States today, and they are people of color who should not be ignored. Why do we continue to disregard the Asians ? Because their story does not fit the narrative promoted by the left. They are thus ignored and now the FBI has disappeared their statistic data from view. They did this for important reasons, it was not inadvertent.

    crimes against whites fell from 3.5 million in 2018 to 2.7 million instances in 2019.
    White victims fell 22%
    Black victimization dropped 12%
    Hispanic victimization increased 5%

    while the 160,000 - 190,000 Asian victims were ignore by the FBI in 2019.

    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Sam Helix

    Prolly because the DOJ recategorized the misdemeanor of Whites giving sassy talk back to Blacks as a violent crime.

    , @bomag
    @Sam Helix

    The Black-White change seems to be largely a shifting of the "other" category.

    The Hispanic-Black change is a bit anomalous; partly explained by a shifting of the "other" category; and maybe some shifting of Asian to Hispanic.

    , @Alan Mercer
    @Sam Helix


    It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.
     
    Careful. Fix a race (say, black). If victimization were race-blind, then perps in attacks on blacks would be proportional to the background population: 60% white (non-hispanic) and 13.5% black.

    In reality it's not so simple. We expect to see disparities in proportions, as blacks live among blacks more often than among whites. If the races were uniformly violent, blacks would account for much more than 13.5% of perps in crime on blacks. Likewise, they would account for much less than 13.5% of perps in crime on whites.

    , @TWS
    @Sam Helix

    Hispanic is a victim category, white is the criminal category.

  10. Gotta close the gap

  11. One of the more astonishing results in recent years has been that in 2018, black victims of “violent incidents” reported in the survey that less than 0.1% of their victimizers were Asian. In contrast, Asian victims of violent incidents reported that 27.5% of their victimizers were black, for a black-Asian interracial violence ratio of over 275 to one.

    I blame the White Christian cis-het power structure.

    • Replies: @Inquiring Mind
    @syonredux

    If you look carefully at the chart, for Asians reporting violence, the offenders split equally into the White, Black, Asian (the table's use of capitalization) and a mix of classifications to be consider "Other."

    This means that yes, persons in the Black category are offending against Asians at multiples the rate per population as Whites, but given that Asians are such a small presence, they are offending at an even higher rate than Blacks?

    (This comparison was meant to be humorous use of statistics -- you can hit the LOL button now)

  12. @syonredux

    One of the more astonishing results in recent years has been that in 2018, black victims of “violent incidents” reported in the survey that less than 0.1% of their victimizers were Asian. In contrast, Asian victims of violent incidents reported that 27.5% of their victimizers were black, for a black-Asian interracial violence ratio of over 275 to one.
     
    I blame the White Christian cis-het power structure.

    Replies: @Inquiring Mind

    If you look carefully at the chart, for Asians reporting violence, the offenders split equally into the White, Black, Asian (the table’s use of capitalization) and a mix of classifications to be consider “Other.”

    This means that yes, persons in the Black category are offending against Asians at multiples the rate per population as Whites, but given that Asians are such a small presence, they are offending at an even higher rate than Blacks?

    (This comparison was meant to be humorous use of statistics — you can hit the LOL button now)

  13. There is a Chinese rapper and “former” gang member known as China Mac. I saw him interviewed on Vice. He seems pretty formidable. He’s done time at Rikers. I imagine his SATs were among the highest there.

  14. I wonder how how closely the pattern of black violence matches blacks’ rate of contact with other races. Most of their victims are fellow blacks, as would be expected, as their crimes are usually committed close to home. But do they kill whites at a rate that’s disproportionate to their level of contact with them?

  15. @Morton's toes
    The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @ThisIsAnon153Replying, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Astuteobservor II, @SunBakedSuburb

    Why would they use domestic Chinese when whites like myself would happily sacrifice their life for Chinese dominance of the United States?

    • LOL: AndrewR
  16. More importantly, how can this be blamed on White people?

  17. Okay then. Import more Asians. When we get to one billion people, mostly Asian, everything will be okay for us. It would make the great composer Alma Mahler proud.

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Buzz Mohawk

    At least they seem saner than us when it comes to running their own political affairs.....

  18. When will Asians take responsibility for “leapfrogging” over blacks in education and business? Isn’t there some sort of queue that all PoCs are standing in, and isn’t there some order of precedence for benefits, scholarships, jobs and political offices?

    No cuts, Asians!

  19. Whether intentionally, or not, listing the numbers by the percentage of the total crimes committed against the victim-group gives a false impression of equivalence, because whites are by far the most numerous victim-group.

    For example, the perp/victim cells for B/W and W/B crimes are 15.3% and 10.6%, respectively. At first glance, you might think this means blacks are about 50% more likely to be the perp in interracial crime.

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1, the per capita difference in propensity for interracial crime would be that much more extreme. Thus, it seems the average black person is 61.25 times, or 6,125%, more likely to commit an interracial crime against a white, than vice versa.

    Caveat: I’ve been known to mess up simple calculations before. So someone might want to double check my math on this.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Hypnotoad666

    @Hypnotoad766


    So blacks collectively commit 875% times more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

     

    875% times as much. 775% more.
    , @res
    @Hypnotoad666


    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.
     
    That's a good way to think about it. It would be worthwhile to recast that whole table in terms of absolute numbers of crimes as well as the percentages given.

    The numbers are even more dramatic if you recast them as per capita for the offending race. Which arguably is the right way to do it when assessing group average criminality. Though it is a bit unfair given the greater proportion of whites as potential victims.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.
     
    What Reg Cæsar said.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1
     
    That's a bit high. Typically I see numbers like 13% black and 72% white which would be 5.5:1.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    , @Wilkey
    @Hypnotoad666


    Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes...And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1
     
    Eh?

    Something in the data is jacked up. Whites don't outnumber blacks by 7-to-1, not even if Hispanics are included. Blacks are about 13% of the population. Non-Hispanic whites are maybe about 65%.

    Also the victimization rates seem...interesting. Over six times as many violent crimes committed against whites as compared to blacks, even though there are only five times as many whites as blacks, and blacks are known to be more violent, and most violent crimes are committed against ones own. Hispanics and Asians also appear to be victims at similar or higher rates than blacks.

    I get that blacks maybe don't report violent incidents to police as readily as other races, but the data on the MIG...I mean the crime rates is inaccurate.
    , @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @Hypnotoad666

    The ratio of whites to Blacks in America is 5 to 1

    There are 195 million whites and 40 million Blacks in the United States.

    If we count the White Hispanics there are 225 million Whites in America verse 42 million Blacks, still closer to a ratio of 5 to 1

    The ratio was 7 to 1 in 1970 when the US population was 87% White and 11% Black. But that was 50 years ago.

  20. OT: Someone on 4chan posted that Hunter Biden just killed himself with an overdose of crack. No idea if this is true or not.

    • Replies: @Polistra
    @Anon

    Hint: it's not true. But Social Media are banning links to his sex tape, so there's that. Also:

    https://i.ibb.co/k6rynXt/Screenshot-20201026-011548-Chrome.jpg

    Even the Blue Checks took notice!

  21. Anon[908] • Disclaimer says:

    I’d like to know more about the attacking “Asians” and the circumstances of the attacks. Like maybe it’s stuff like a college girlfriend-boyfriend situation where the Asian girl breaks up with the black boyfriend, the black ex-boyfriend bursts into her dorm room yelling at her, the girlfriend calls the cops, the cops show up and while questioning the ex-boyfriend notice a minor scratch on his cheek, and because they are in a DV zero-tolerannce/must-file jurisdiction (thanks, feminists) the girl is arrested.

  22. @Hypnotoad666
    Whether intentionally, or not, listing the numbers by the percentage of the total crimes committed against the victim-group gives a false impression of equivalence, because whites are by far the most numerous victim-group.

    For example, the perp/victim cells for B/W and W/B crimes are 15.3% and 10.6%, respectively. At first glance, you might think this means blacks are about 50% more likely to be the perp in interracial crime.

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1, the per capita difference in propensity for interracial crime would be that much more extreme. Thus, it seems the average black person is 61.25 times, or 6,125%, more likely to commit an interracial crime against a white, than vice versa.

    Caveat: I've been known to mess up simple calculations before. So someone might want to double check my math on this.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    @Hypnotoad766

    So blacks collectively commit 875% times more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    875% times as much. 775% more.

  23. Ok, but why are global flu cases down 98%?

  24. My hunch is the 0.1% resembled this guy.

  25. Asians know Blacks are more criminal. Everyone does. Won’t change how they vote.

    Do you think White liberals, women, Jews or any other group doesn’t wet their pants at the thought of being in a Black neighborhood, especially after dark?

    They’ll lie through their teeth about it because White men provide them protection anyway. Even though they demonize White men.

    • Replies: @right wing Jew
    @RichardTaylor

    Nah, brother, Asians change their vote in riot years. Look at the exit polls in 2014 after Ferguson. Asians are probably the most flexible group in terms of vote. They do vote Dem normally, but there is no way in hell that Chong Foo Suk or whatever is voting for Biden after Golden Garden got torched.

  26. Anon[908] • Disclaimer says:

    There is a contact page for the Bureau of Justice Statistics:

    https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=contactus

    Steve, why don’t you call Ms. McCarthy on the phone? You are media in the 2020 sense of the word. You’ll get a much better response if she is contacting the report authors on your behalf than if you try email.

    Possible escalations if you don’t get cooperation are higher ups in Trump’s Justice Department, like Trump appointee Claire McCusker Murray, Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General, who is in the line of authority over the stat people, via telephone, and Wesley Yang via Twitter.

    There is no reason why the BJS could not correct the online version of the report and supply an explanatory corrigenda. Why don’t you demand that?

  27. Note that the BJS warned that the cell showing that less than 0.1% of victimizers of blacks were reported by blacks to be Asian…

    Blacks may not know what “Asian” means. Did they try other, more common terms, such as “Chinee” or “Ching-chong”?

  28. @Jim Bob Lassiter
    Asians in Amurika aren't "gun nuts".

    Replies: @Kronos, @Bozo the Clown

    I’ve met a few in Texas that really enjoyed the Cowboy persona.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Kronos

    Was Kamala Harris named after Mrs Chuck Connors?


    https://ilarge.lisimg.com/image/7513277/917full-kamala-devi.jpg

    Replies: @duncsbaby

  29. News flash! According to Google News and the Washington Post, Trump has admitted total defeat in the War on Covid-19. You weren’t thinking of voting for him, were you? No, I didn’t think you were. Glad we could help.

    • Replies: @Steve in Greensboro
    @Polistra

    Not that it needed confirmation, but thanks for confirming what most thoughtful people already know, that the WaPo are shills for the Ruling Class, just like the rest of the State Media.

    Here is how the "pandemic" is working. People are not actually dying much of the Wuhan Flu anymore. Cuomo (NY) and Murphy (NJ) have already killed off many of the risky folks, those over 70 living in retirement warehouses, by forcing infected oldsters into them.

    Testing has ramped up, so more cases are being identified. With deaths trailing off, the State Media switched to cases. Of course, more positive cases with flat deaths mean the actual observed fatality rate of the Wuhan Flu drops off sharply. More people, particularly children, die of the regular flu.

    Leftists of course are still afraid of the Wuhan Flu. (Leftists are very easy to frighten with fairy tales -- like little girls in that way). So they will hide in their basement and not turn out to vote. Once again, the Democrats only hope for winning a national election rest of their industrial-scale voter fraud.

  30. Back before the media realized they could use COVID-19 to try to sink Trump’s re-election, they talked a lot about how it was being fueled by anti-Asian racism, and breathlessly reported on every anti-Asian incident. Despite the fact that we could all easily see who was the one doing it whenever they found the suspect, the media worked very hard to blame, who else, white people.

    I have witnessed a few COVID-fueled incidents of verbal abuse this year, and not surprisingly, it was blacks yelling and harassing Asians each time.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Mycale

    I remember that. Mostly NYC street and subway incidents. Everybody knew it was black or Hispanic in Asian violence. But the articles implied the violence was committed by descendants of the evil Whites who pushed thru the Chinese exclusion acts. 120 years ago. There was always an editorial about White discrimination and prejudice towards Chinese 130,140 years ago. And of course the WW2, detention camps on the west coast.

    No mention the camps were only for ethnic Japanese while the numerous Chinese and Philippinos were left alone

  31. Asians in media, politics and academia, typically funneled through the Ivies, are teaming with Jews to promote anti-white propaganda. You see it everywhere you look, but nobody wants to talk about it.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Change that Matters
    @Peterike

    I know a self-described "lapsed Singaporean" Chinese who lives in the US and who peppers her tweets with Yid Speaks such as "oy vey".

    Hopefully they'll all live to rue the day they sided with the Jewx.

  32. @Hypnotoad666
    Whether intentionally, or not, listing the numbers by the percentage of the total crimes committed against the victim-group gives a false impression of equivalence, because whites are by far the most numerous victim-group.

    For example, the perp/victim cells for B/W and W/B crimes are 15.3% and 10.6%, respectively. At first glance, you might think this means blacks are about 50% more likely to be the perp in interracial crime.

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1, the per capita difference in propensity for interracial crime would be that much more extreme. Thus, it seems the average black person is 61.25 times, or 6,125%, more likely to commit an interracial crime against a white, than vice versa.

    Caveat: I've been known to mess up simple calculations before. So someone might want to double check my math on this.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    That’s a good way to think about it. It would be worthwhile to recast that whole table in terms of absolute numbers of crimes as well as the percentages given.

    The numbers are even more dramatic if you recast them as per capita for the offending race. Which arguably is the right way to do it when assessing group average criminality. Though it is a bit unfair given the greater proportion of whites as potential victims.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    What Reg Cæsar said.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1

    That’s a bit high. Typically I see numbers like 13% black and 72% white which would be 5.5:1.

    • Replies: @Ben tillman
    @res

    And the real numbers are about 56 percent to 13.5 percent for a ration of 4.1:1.

    Replies: @res

  33. @Hypnotoad666
    Whether intentionally, or not, listing the numbers by the percentage of the total crimes committed against the victim-group gives a false impression of equivalence, because whites are by far the most numerous victim-group.

    For example, the perp/victim cells for B/W and W/B crimes are 15.3% and 10.6%, respectively. At first glance, you might think this means blacks are about 50% more likely to be the perp in interracial crime.

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1, the per capita difference in propensity for interracial crime would be that much more extreme. Thus, it seems the average black person is 61.25 times, or 6,125%, more likely to commit an interracial crime against a white, than vice versa.

    Caveat: I've been known to mess up simple calculations before. So someone might want to double check my math on this.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes…And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1

    Eh?

    Something in the data is jacked up. Whites don’t outnumber blacks by 7-to-1, not even if Hispanics are included. Blacks are about 13% of the population. Non-Hispanic whites are maybe about 65%.

    Also the victimization rates seem…interesting. Over six times as many violent crimes committed against whites as compared to blacks, even though there are only five times as many whites as blacks, and blacks are known to be more violent, and most violent crimes are committed against ones own. Hispanics and Asians also appear to be victims at similar or higher rates than blacks.

    I get that blacks maybe don’t report violent incidents to police as readily as other races, but the data on the MIG…I mean the crime rates is inaccurate.

  34. Interesting that whites are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime than any other racial group.

    The numbers demonstrate that in 2018 1.8% of the 196 million whites were victimized and 1.3% of the 42 million Blacks were victimized.

    Since blacks seem to be involved in more violence, it is surprising that Whites are more likely to be victimized than Blacks (1.3%) or Hispanics (1.2%) or Asians (.09%)

  35. are central americans the only people in the country now who openly stand up to blacks?

  36. @Kronos
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    I’ve met a few in Texas that really enjoyed the Cowboy persona.

    https://www.afr.com/content/dam/images/g/v/f/t/v/j/image.related.afrArticleLead.620x350.h12p5d.png/1531646990803.jpg

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Was Kamala Harris named after Mrs Chuck Connors?

    • Replies: @duncsbaby
    @Reg Cæsar

    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

    Replies: @Kronos, @Reg Cæsar

  37. “… In contrast, Asian victims of violent incidents reported that 27.5% of their victimizers were black, for a black-Asian interracial violence ratio of over 275 to one.”

    I think you have to adjust for the fact that there are a bit more than twice as many blacks as Asians in the US which reduces the ratio to something like 120.

  38. when did asians violently victimize blacks?

    i want to actually see this.

    pics or it didn’t happen, as they say.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @prime noticer


    when did asians violently victimize blacks?

    i want to actually see this.

    pics or it didn’t happen, as they say.
     
    https://youtu.be/8ic2k2P_FG0
  39. And Asians still vote for the anti White Democrat party coalition of Jews blacks Asians dot Indians Hispanics MENAS and anti White wealthy Whites.

    15 relatives will contribute 13 years of private school tuition to keep one Asian relative out of the public school system. But they still vote democrat

    Asians don’t care about Whites. Why should Whites care about Asians?

    There’s a Chinese American section of the California Republican Party. It’s only interest is to continue Taiwan independence. It’s funded by the guy who owns Panda Express and others.

    • Agree: 3g4me
  40. @Hypnotoad666
    Whether intentionally, or not, listing the numbers by the percentage of the total crimes committed against the victim-group gives a false impression of equivalence, because whites are by far the most numerous victim-group.

    For example, the perp/victim cells for B/W and W/B crimes are 15.3% and 10.6%, respectively. At first glance, you might think this means blacks are about 50% more likely to be the perp in interracial crime.

    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1, the per capita difference in propensity for interracial crime would be that much more extreme. Thus, it seems the average black person is 61.25 times, or 6,125%, more likely to commit an interracial crime against a white, than vice versa.

    Caveat: I've been known to mess up simple calculations before. So someone might want to double check my math on this.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    The ratio of whites to Blacks in America is 5 to 1

    There are 195 million whites and 40 million Blacks in the United States.

    If we count the White Hispanics there are 225 million Whites in America verse 42 million Blacks, still closer to a ratio of 5 to 1

    The ratio was 7 to 1 in 1970 when the US population was 87% White and 11% Black. But that was 50 years ago.

    • Agree: TWS
  41. Holy Shit. I knew it was bad but these numbers are more eye-opening than any stats I’ve seen recently. I think I’m gonna print them off and keep them in my back pocket, that way anytime anyone hints at systemic racism or says anything remotely in support of BLM, I’ll just show them the numbers and politely encourage them to shut the fuck up.

  42. The percentages on different rows aren’t directly comparable, so it’s not 275 times. When you convert to actual numbers, the black-on-asian vs asian-on-black crime is more like 50k to 6. So essentially the percentage is arbitrarily bad.

  43. @Mike Tre
    Yeah but how many times have Asian convenience store owners overcharged (by overcharged, I mean required payment) negroes for Black N Mild cigars?

    Replies: @Polistra

    And even when we do try to pay, they refuse to break our Benjamins. Racist!

  44. What’s the total victimization ratio of Ashkenazi, American/Israeli Jews vs the rest of society/world? Sorry I noticed. Moron I am. Hello, Gulog. Like the wise man said, who or whom are we NOT allowed to criticize?

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jim Christian

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/16/uk-supreme-court-backs-housing-charitys-jewish-only-rule


    A woman seeking housing in east London who alleged racial discrimination when a housing charity reserved its properties for Orthodox Jewish people has lost her case at the supreme court.

    In a ruling that cements positive discrimination as a legitimate way to tackle social disadvantage, the UK’s highest court of appeal found in favour of the Agudas Israel housing association in Stamford Hill after it listed its homes for rent with the caveat of “consideration only to the Orthodox Jewish community”.

    A lawyer for the non-Jewish woman, who has not been named, argued that the policy “smacked of ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’,” a reference to signs pinned up by some landlords decades ago.

    But the high court, the court of appeal and now the supreme court have all ruled it was legal because it overcame the social and economic disadvantage faced by the community of Haredi Jews in the area. Some do not speak English and face antisemitism, partly because of their traditional dress.

    The charity’s 470 homes were listed by the London borough of Hackney as part of the wider social housing supply, which is under pressure in that part of the capital. Six of them came up during a period when the complainant, a mother of four, was at the top of the waiting list, but she was offered none. She alleged that the council and housing charity were letting Orthodox Jewish families “jump the queue”.

    The housing association’s charitable objectives state it is “primarily for the benefit of the Orthodox Jewish community”. The application form for housing asks if applicants are “strictly observant of shabbath and kashrut [dietary laws]”, which synagogue and schools they use and whether they are ethnically “Orthodox Jewish Ashkenazi” or “Orthodox Jewish Sephardic”.
     

    As journalist Christina Patterson found out, anti-Gentilism is a thing in Stamford Hill - it's just not a concept the law recognises.

    Replies: @right wing Jew, @photondancer, @bomag

    , @anonymous
    @Jim Christian

    What? Jews commit hardly any street crime, in the US, Israel, or any other country. The exceptions, like the Son of Sam guy, or Hyman Roth, are memorable because they are rare.

    Replies: @Father O'Hara

  45. @Reg Cæsar
    @Kronos

    Was Kamala Harris named after Mrs Chuck Connors?


    https://ilarge.lisimg.com/image/7513277/917full-kamala-devi.jpg

    Replies: @duncsbaby

    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @duncsbaby

    Indians (and Hispanics) were considered Caucasian Whites until relatively recently. The US government empowerment grants for race were simply too good to pass up.

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @duncsbaby


    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

     

    I think she was legally a Briton, like her mother. She would have come to America under the 1920s' quotas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbxK_8IX_6s&t=2m16s

  46. @Anon
    OT: Someone on 4chan posted that Hunter Biden just killed himself with an overdose of crack. No idea if this is true or not.

    Replies: @Polistra

    Hint: it’s not true. But Social Media are banning links to his sex tape, so there’s that. Also:

    Even the Blue Checks took notice!

  47. Ask this guy: (Language warning!)

    LMAO pic.twitter.com/1UtEsgPXU9— Zoomer Clips 🎃 (@ZoomerClips) October 26, 2020

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    @White Guy In Japan

    Did he get that from Bill O'Reilly's No Spin Zone?

    Replies: @White Guy In Japan

  48. This is a combination of two of the worst isteve obsessions:

    a) Trying to prove that blacks are actually lucky to have whites lording over them and that they shouldn’t go anywhere

    and

    b) Using the “logic” (crime and education stats) that says that blacks are inferior to whites to say that whites are also inferior to asians and that we would be lucky to have them lord over us.

    a) is true (but only tangentially because of blinkered logic steve uses) but is completely irrational to talk about because it discourages racial separation and b) is absurd because it takes that logic to its ridiculous conclusion.

    Sad!

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    @Guy De Champlagne

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account? Because I would agree with you.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren't going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America. Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I resent so many "elite" Whites showing no loyalty to their own people.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

  49. @Buzz Mohawk
    Okay then. Import more Asians. When we get to one billion people, mostly Asian, everything will be okay for us. It would make the great composer Alma Mahler proud.

    Replies: @Neoconned

    At least they seem saner than us when it comes to running their own political affairs…..

  50. @White Guy In Japan
    Ask this guy: (Language warning!)

    LMAO pic.twitter.com/1UtEsgPXU9— Zoomer Clips 🎃 (@ZoomerClips) October 26, 2020
     

    Replies: @Father O'Hara

    Did he get that from Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin Zone?

    • Replies: @White Guy In Japan
    @Father O'Hara

    No, that's my father-in-law.

  51. Here is a first-hand account by a women from North Korea who was robbed by 3 black girls in Chicago.

    She said that one of them punched her. She reacted by chasing them down. The blacks called her racist, which resulted in other blacks surrounding her. They said that just because they’re black doesn’t mean they are thieves.

    She insists that they’re the racists and wishes we could stop seeing color, so that we can actually not be racist. They would not protect her, because she was not black.

    The black girls bought $4000 worth of stuff at Bloomingdales.

    She said “I learned I should never fight back from a robbery, because these people are actually really violent. I didn’t expect them to be punching me right in the middle of Michigan Avenue, where tons of people walking by.”

    She says she still loves America. She seems like sweet, smart lady. Glad she wasn’t permanently injured or killed.

    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
    @ziggurat

    She's a complete fool for leaving a developed, homogenous first world nation like North Korea for an anarchic third world country like America.

  52. @Guy De Champlagne
    This is a combination of two of the worst isteve obsessions:

    a) Trying to prove that blacks are actually lucky to have whites lording over them and that they shouldn't go anywhere

    and

    b) Using the "logic" (crime and education stats) that says that blacks are inferior to whites to say that whites are also inferior to asians and that we would be lucky to have them lord over us.

    a) is true (but only tangentially because of blinkered logic steve uses) but is completely irrational to talk about because it discourages racial separation and b) is absurd because it takes that logic to its ridiculous conclusion.

    Sad!

    Replies: @RichardTaylor

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account? Because I would agree with you.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren’t going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America. Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I resent so many “elite” Whites showing no loyalty to their own people.

    • Replies: @Guy De Champlagne
    @RichardTaylor

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account?

    I'm agnostic on genetic racial differences having any behavioral effects. I think it's far from settled and not even that relevant. We're closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I think ethnically christian whites needs their own country where only white christians are allowed to procreate. That's the humane, rational way to achieve ethnic cleansing, through restrictions on procreation. That's also the humane, rational way to procreate, with a range of tests and restrictions relating to many different criteria.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren’t going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America.

    And I think that high achieving groups should displace low achieving groups globally. It's inhumane and stupid to allow people to wallow in dysfunction and misery, or even to be propped up through charity, indefinitely when they could just be humanely replaced.

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    I'm criticizing what I said I was criticizing. The shallow, unnecessarily complex analysis of the white-black relationship. Whites would be better off without blacks, and blacks would be worse off without whites. Whites are better at generating well-being than blacks are and the current relationship has the net result of blacks taking well-being away from whites. It's that simple. Look at the quality of life of black West African compared to African Americans. Who cares about SAT scores?

    Similarly asians take away well being from whites. SAT scores be damned. High SAT scorers who goto elite colleges and onto elite career tracks in finance, consulting, and technology in elite cities are just another a kind of parasite who steal wealth and wellbeing created by other people for themselves.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Jim Bob Lassiter

  53. @Trelane
    I'm surprised Asian Triads, Tongs, Yakuza don't kill more blacks.

    Replies: @El Dato, @TWS

    Maybe they are using blackface to stay unrecognized?

  54. @duncsbaby
    @Reg Cæsar

    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

    Replies: @Kronos, @Reg Cæsar

    Indians (and Hispanics) were considered Caucasian Whites until relatively recently. The US government empowerment grants for race were simply too good to pass up.

  55. Steve, you make a mathematical error when you state that these figures show that “blacks violently victimized Asians 275+ times as often as Asians violently victimized blacks.”

    To illustrate the error, let’s use large (unrealistic) numbers. Suppose blacks were victims of violent incidents 100 million times last year, while Asians were victims of violent incidents only 1,000 times.

    In that case, according to the figures you cited, about 100,000 of the 100 million incidents in which blacks were victimized would have involved an Asian perpetrator. But only 275 incidents would have involved an Asian violently victimized by a black perpetrator.

    You can see by the above example that the fact that 27.5% is 275 times greater than 0.1% does not mean that the one thing happened “275 times as often” as the other.

    The larger point of your entry is, of course, well taken.

  56. Blacks are equal opportunity haters.

  57. @RichardTaylor
    @Guy De Champlagne

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account? Because I would agree with you.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren't going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America. Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I resent so many "elite" Whites showing no loyalty to their own people.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account?

    I’m agnostic on genetic racial differences having any behavioral effects. I think it’s far from settled and not even that relevant. We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I think ethnically christian whites needs their own country where only white christians are allowed to procreate. That’s the humane, rational way to achieve ethnic cleansing, through restrictions on procreation. That’s also the humane, rational way to procreate, with a range of tests and restrictions relating to many different criteria.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren’t going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America.

    And I think that high achieving groups should displace low achieving groups globally. It’s inhumane and stupid to allow people to wallow in dysfunction and misery, or even to be propped up through charity, indefinitely when they could just be humanely replaced.

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    I’m criticizing what I said I was criticizing. The shallow, unnecessarily complex analysis of the white-black relationship. Whites would be better off without blacks, and blacks would be worse off without whites. Whites are better at generating well-being than blacks are and the current relationship has the net result of blacks taking well-being away from whites. It’s that simple. Look at the quality of life of black West African compared to African Americans. Who cares about SAT scores?

    Similarly asians take away well being from whites. SAT scores be damned. High SAT scorers who goto elite colleges and onto elite career tracks in finance, consulting, and technology in elite cities are just another a kind of parasite who steal wealth and wellbeing created by other people for themselves.

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    @Guy De Champlagne

    We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Someday that may be true but I don't see it in this century.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Guy De Champlagne

    "We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones."

    WTF is that supposed to mean? Margaret Sanger was certain (and was right) that we had long arrived at that solution in terms of medical science.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

  58. @Peterike
    Asians in media, politics and academia, typically funneled through the Ivies, are teaming with Jews to promote anti-white propaganda. You see it everywhere you look, but nobody wants to talk about it.

    Replies: @Change that Matters

    I know a self-described “lapsed Singaporean” Chinese who lives in the US and who peppers her tweets with Yid Speaks such as “oy vey”.

    Hopefully they’ll all live to rue the day they sided with the Jewx.

  59. anon[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites

    .

    Possible that all those crackers pouring in from MENA and the Caucasus are making a difference. White ain’t what it used to be.

    Or white on black violence numbers might be boosted by blacks, especially black women, reporting smirks and other microaggressions as violent incidents.

  60. @Jim Christian
    What's the total victimization ratio of Ashkenazi, American/Israeli Jews vs the rest of society/world? Sorry I noticed. Moron I am. Hello, Gulog. Like the wise man said, who or whom are we NOT allowed to criticize?

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @anonymous

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/16/uk-supreme-court-backs-housing-charitys-jewish-only-rule

    A woman seeking housing in east London who alleged racial discrimination when a housing charity reserved its properties for Orthodox Jewish people has lost her case at the supreme court.

    In a ruling that cements positive discrimination as a legitimate way to tackle social disadvantage, the UK’s highest court of appeal found in favour of the Agudas Israel housing association in Stamford Hill after it listed its homes for rent with the caveat of “consideration only to the Orthodox Jewish community”.

    A lawyer for the non-Jewish woman, who has not been named, argued that the policy “smacked of ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’,” a reference to signs pinned up by some landlords decades ago.

    But the high court, the court of appeal and now the supreme court have all ruled it was legal because it overcame the social and economic disadvantage faced by the community of Haredi Jews in the area. Some do not speak English and face antisemitism, partly because of their traditional dress.

    The charity’s 470 homes were listed by the London borough of Hackney as part of the wider social housing supply, which is under pressure in that part of the capital. Six of them came up during a period when the complainant, a mother of four, was at the top of the waiting list, but she was offered none. She alleged that the council and housing charity were letting Orthodox Jewish families “jump the queue”.

    The housing association’s charitable objectives state it is “primarily for the benefit of the Orthodox Jewish community”. The application form for housing asks if applicants are “strictly observant of shabbath and kashrut [dietary laws]”, which synagogue and schools they use and whether they are ethnically “Orthodox Jewish Ashkenazi” or “Orthodox Jewish Sephardic”.

    As journalist Christina Patterson found out, anti-Gentilism is a thing in Stamford Hill – it’s just not a concept the law recognises.

    • Replies: @right wing Jew
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Anyone can convert to Orthodox Judaism, which is the catch there, so its technically open to anyone like any HOA or condo complex. Simply follow the rules. There are black Ultra Orthodox Jews that are considered Lithuanian Jews. Ergo, there is no ethnic consideration. I have orthodox family married to the ugliest apes with hellspawned children. *shrug emoji*

    eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natan_Gamedze

    , @photondancer
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Not speaking English shouldn't count as a disadvantage, since it is entirely self-inflicted.

    , @bomag
    @YetAnotherAnon

    So, I guess that in the future, everyone will belong to some kind of religious ("religious") group that carves out and protects territory.

    Islam is correct about more than women.

  61. @Guy De Champlagne
    @RichardTaylor

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account?

    I'm agnostic on genetic racial differences having any behavioral effects. I think it's far from settled and not even that relevant. We're closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I think ethnically christian whites needs their own country where only white christians are allowed to procreate. That's the humane, rational way to achieve ethnic cleansing, through restrictions on procreation. That's also the humane, rational way to procreate, with a range of tests and restrictions relating to many different criteria.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren’t going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America.

    And I think that high achieving groups should displace low achieving groups globally. It's inhumane and stupid to allow people to wallow in dysfunction and misery, or even to be propped up through charity, indefinitely when they could just be humanely replaced.

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    I'm criticizing what I said I was criticizing. The shallow, unnecessarily complex analysis of the white-black relationship. Whites would be better off without blacks, and blacks would be worse off without whites. Whites are better at generating well-being than blacks are and the current relationship has the net result of blacks taking well-being away from whites. It's that simple. Look at the quality of life of black West African compared to African Americans. Who cares about SAT scores?

    Similarly asians take away well being from whites. SAT scores be damned. High SAT scorers who goto elite colleges and onto elite career tracks in finance, consulting, and technology in elite cities are just another a kind of parasite who steal wealth and wellbeing created by other people for themselves.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Jim Bob Lassiter

    We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Someday that may be true but I don’t see it in this century.

    • Replies: @Guy De Champlagne
    @RichardTaylor

    The ability to give a couple a child that is theirs just with the bad genetic parts remedied is way closer than the ability to give a child the parents culture just with all the bad cultural parts remedied. It's inconceivable how the latter would even work. I guess it would involve raising the children by robots or with strict computer oversight of the parents.

    Trying to predict the pace and nature of technological change is ultimately a fool's errand.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

  62. @Father O'Hara
    @White Guy In Japan

    Did he get that from Bill O'Reilly's No Spin Zone?

    Replies: @White Guy In Japan

    No, that’s my father-in-law.

  63. @Morton's toes
    The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @ThisIsAnon153Replying, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Astuteobservor II, @SunBakedSuburb

    I’ve been noticing this too. Half the people at the range now seem to be chinks. And they look like fobs. They’re very good shots. They’re also not obese chain smoking boomers like 60% of the white guys at the range.

    Could be sleeper cells. Or, they might legitimately like guns, I talked to a few Chinese people who said it would be unheard of for them to own a gun in China and were into shooting here.

  64. @Jim Bob Lassiter
    Asians in Amurika aren't "gun nuts".

    Replies: @Kronos, @Bozo the Clown

    Growing up in Chicago, the first two gun nuts I ever met were one Vietnamese (who loved America/hated commies) and one half-Japanese fella.

  65. Not reporting the small number of Black on Asian crime reminds me of the interracial rape data. At one point the white-on-Black rape count was so low, they just stopped reporting it.

    • Agree: RichardTaylor
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @eric

    'Statistical zero' - that is as close as non existent as you can possibly get.

    Considering the *enormous* number of white men in the USA, that is tens of millions, to get a null result from this particular data set, in the field of the countless billions of individual human interactions which every day life in the USA throws up, is beyond remarkable.

    The real upshot and takeaway from this is that white men are sexually repulsed from black women in an exceedingly powerful genetically determined way.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    , @Donald A Thomson
    @eric

    In Australia it's quite common for European men to have Aboriginal girlfriends. That only depends on their living somewhere where Aborigines also live.

    If you only go on talk, they're the most racist Australians but they love their children and their wives if they're still with them. All I've ever met complain about some of their wives' families and two have scars from knife wounds inflicted by their wives (it's more likely that an Aborigine will reach for a weapon).

    That means that many find Aboriginal women sufficiently attractive and they're no more attractive than US Blacks. Perhaps the US rape statistics just reflect the reality that US Blacks are much more violent than US Whites. Also, US Blacks may be more racist than US Whites. There's a whole political movement trying to persuade US Blacks that they should be. [email protected]

  66. @ziggurat
    Here is a first-hand account by a women from North Korea who was robbed by 3 black girls in Chicago.

    She said that one of them punched her. She reacted by chasing them down. The blacks called her racist, which resulted in other blacks surrounding her. They said that just because they're black doesn't mean they are thieves.

    She insists that they're the racists and wishes we could stop seeing color, so that we can actually not be racist. They would not protect her, because she was not black.

    The black girls bought $4000 worth of stuff at Bloomingdales.

    She said "I learned I should never fight back from a robbery, because these people are actually really violent. I didn't expect them to be punching me right in the middle of Michigan Avenue, where tons of people walking by."

    She says she still loves America. She seems like sweet, smart lady. Glad she wasn't permanently injured or killed.

    https://youtu.be/iYQNbsrDhKI?t=550

    Replies: @Supply and Demand

    She’s a complete fool for leaving a developed, homogenous first world nation like North Korea for an anarchic third world country like America.

  67. Anonymous[235] • Disclaimer says:

    Asians in my experience are more naive and trusting of blacks than whites are, and more inclined to actually believe the “we’re all the same” nonsense.

    Many if not most whites genuinely see blacks as violent and dangerous and deliberately avoid them, even if most whites wouldn’t admit it. In contrast I get the impression that Asians are more naive about the threat blacks pose and don’t actually see the danger, or not until it’s too late at least.

    I believe this is some of the reason why Asians are basically the only non-blacks prepared to operate businesses in black areas, they’re actually quite naive to the dangers of being in these areas.

    • Replies: @Marty
    @Anonymous

    You might be right. Still, I was amazed a few years ago on the golf course when a guy in his 60’s, a kiwi fruit marketer who looked like a cross between Jack Kemp and Burl Ives, told me that blacks “are just like us.” Oh, he was also about to visit “the reservation” in Okla.

    , @Slimer
    @Anonymous

    More brave, you meant. White men are chickens unless they've got a gun, and a room full of unarmed people to kill. Preferably children.

  68. We Americans are VERY selective in our racism. We hate blacks, but love asians, even the dark skinned kind from India.

  69. @Morton's toes
    The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @ThisIsAnon153Replying, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Astuteobservor II, @SunBakedSuburb

    How do you know they were Chinese? Korean shop owners like to be heavily armed.

  70. @res
    @Hypnotoad666


    But those are percentages of two very different raw numbers. Blacks perpetrated 15.3% of the 3.5 million total crimes against whites, or about 525,000 interracial crimes. Whereas whites perpetrated 10.6% of the 563,000 total crimes against blacks, or only about 60,000 interracial crimes.
     
    That's a good way to think about it. It would be worthwhile to recast that whole table in terms of absolute numbers of crimes as well as the percentages given.

    The numbers are even more dramatic if you recast them as per capita for the offending race. Which arguably is the right way to do it when assessing group average criminality. Though it is a bit unfair given the greater proportion of whites as potential victims.

    So blacks collectively commit 875% more interracial crimes against whites, than vice versa.
     
    What Reg Cæsar said.

    And since whites outnumber blacks by about 7:1
     
    That's a bit high. Typically I see numbers like 13% black and 72% white which would be 5.5:1.

    Replies: @Ben tillman

    And the real numbers are about 56 percent to 13.5 percent for a ration of 4.1:1.

    • Replies: @res
    @Ben tillman

    I take it you get those numbers by backing Hispanics out of "white" in a source like this?
    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219

    Note that link actually gives white alone numbers as well. 60.1%

    It is important to be consistent about whether Hispanics and whites are grouped or not.

  71. @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    good point…but it could be that Blacks identify their Hispanic assailants as white more often.

    We cannot trust the Feds. They continue to hide and distort the statistics. Why would they eliminate the Asian category ? There are 20 million Asians in the United States today, and they are people of color who should not be ignored. Why do we continue to disregard the Asians ? Because their story does not fit the narrative promoted by the left. They are thus ignored and now the FBI has disappeared their statistic data from view. They did this for important reasons, it was not inadvertent.

    crimes against whites fell from 3.5 million in 2018 to 2.7 million instances in 2019.
    White victims fell 22%
    Black victimization dropped 12%
    Hispanic victimization increased 5%

    while the 160,000 – 190,000 Asian victims were ignore by the FBI in 2019.

  72. @Jake
    And yet hordes of younger Asians have come to love the Numinous Negro and to hate in the name of and for the benefit of the Numinous Negro.

    Asians have asssimilated to WASP Elite cultural values.

    Replies: @njguy73, @Curle

    Have you seen this? Got any links to share?

  73. @Jim Christian
    What's the total victimization ratio of Ashkenazi, American/Israeli Jews vs the rest of society/world? Sorry I noticed. Moron I am. Hello, Gulog. Like the wise man said, who or whom are we NOT allowed to criticize?

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @anonymous

    What? Jews commit hardly any street crime, in the US, Israel, or any other country. The exceptions, like the Son of Sam guy, or Hyman Roth, are memorable because they are rare.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    @anonymous

    Its kept hidden. Here on the North Shore,Jewish gangs like the Bar Mitzvah Boys, the Trust Fund Thugs, and the Stone Cold Landsmen wreak havoc. Beatings,rapes,robbery,drugs,killings are at epidemic levels. They call this the Goldman Ghetto. Sad.

  74. @Morton's toes
    The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @ThisIsAnon153Replying, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Astuteobservor II, @SunBakedSuburb

    I talked to my local Chinese takeout owner. He was scared of the blm riots. So he loaded up on guns and ammo. Even though the town he was living in was 99% white.

    And it wasn’t just him, he told me the Chinese in the USA communicate and keep each other up to date on wechat. Most of the Chinese he knows are all stocking up on guns and ammos.

    I am 100% sure if blacks attempt home invasions on them will get shot at. Their most watched video is of a Asian lady shooting 3 home invaders. She killed one out of the 3.

    • Replies: @right wing Jew
    @Astuteobservor II

    I hope that means they will be voting R like they supposedly did in 2014 after Ferguson, which I have been predicting for months. This presages a potential R landslide in unexpected places. There is no way R voting Asians are being picked up in these polls.

    If you worried about your shop burning down, why on Earth would you vote for Biden?

    Replies: @Astuteobservor II

  75. Take Philadelphia. Most of the vibrant neighborhoods are food deserts except for the local tiny shops owned by an Asian. The cops have been made useless over time since the days of Rizzo. Actually I don’t think they even go into North or West Philly unless it is to pick up a corpse. So yeah I can believe Asians see more crime.

    • Replies: @Travis
    @Old and Grumpy

    50,100 Asians were victimized by blacks in 2018 or .24% of the Asian population
    537,200 whites were victimized by blacks in 2018 of .27% of the White population

    So Whites were more likely to be victimized by Blacks compared to Asians in 2018

    I attended school in North Philadelphia, on Girard Ave.. Took the El and the Broad Street Subway to get to my high School from Upper Darby each day. Got mugged once on Girard Ave walking to the subway with 2 kids who brandished a baseball bat back in 1986. Each year a few kids would get mugged walking to the subway. One of my classmates lost the vision in hie eye after being savagely attacked walking down the steps to the subway. Missed about 3 weeks of school, was hospitalized for a few days. He was Chinese, They took nothing from him, just beat him unconscious. He was surprised they did not his expensive watch, but it was nit a mugging, just another vicious hate crime.

  76. @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    Prolly because the DOJ recategorized the misdemeanor of Whites giving sassy talk back to Blacks as a violent crime.

  77. @Guy De Champlagne
    @RichardTaylor

    As if some federally run technocratic social engineering would work if we just took genetics into account?

    I'm agnostic on genetic racial differences having any behavioral effects. I think it's far from settled and not even that relevant. We're closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Our surviving and thriving depends on our right of separation. Not from the country, but the right to have our own spaces. As a practical matter, every other group already has this right.

    I think ethnically christian whites needs their own country where only white christians are allowed to procreate. That's the humane, rational way to achieve ethnic cleansing, through restrictions on procreation. That's also the humane, rational way to procreate, with a range of tests and restrictions relating to many different criteria.

    Latinos, Blacks and Asians aren’t going anywhere and Whites will be a minority in America.

    And I think that high achieving groups should displace low achieving groups globally. It's inhumane and stupid to allow people to wallow in dysfunction and misery, or even to be propped up through charity, indefinitely when they could just be humanely replaced.

    Are you criticizing the tendency to say, in effect: how do we make integration work?

    I'm criticizing what I said I was criticizing. The shallow, unnecessarily complex analysis of the white-black relationship. Whites would be better off without blacks, and blacks would be worse off without whites. Whites are better at generating well-being than blacks are and the current relationship has the net result of blacks taking well-being away from whites. It's that simple. Look at the quality of life of black West African compared to African Americans. Who cares about SAT scores?

    Similarly asians take away well being from whites. SAT scores be damned. High SAT scorers who goto elite colleges and onto elite career tracks in finance, consulting, and technology in elite cities are just another a kind of parasite who steal wealth and wellbeing created by other people for themselves.

    Replies: @RichardTaylor, @Jim Bob Lassiter

    “We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.”

    WTF is that supposed to mean? Margaret Sanger was certain (and was right) that we had long arrived at that solution in terms of medical science.

    • Replies: @Guy De Champlagne
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Even using traditional methods the ability to affect culture is less than the ability to affect genetics. If you give (or force upon) a couple someone elses kids than that child has the genetics of the biological parent, full stop. But the culture of the adopted child will be much more complex. The kid will partially take on the culture of adopted parents, but will still seek out a distinct identity and find cultural influences elsewhere that a biological child would not (especially if the the child doesn't look like the adopted parents e.g. a black child adopted by whites will seek out a black identity and culture in a way that a white couples white child would not).

    Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter

  78. Anonymous[311] • Disclaimer says:
    @eric
    Not reporting the small number of Black on Asian crime reminds me of the interracial rape data. At one point the white-on-Black rape count was so low, they just stopped reporting it.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Donald A Thomson

    ‘Statistical zero’ – that is as close as non existent as you can possibly get.

    Considering the *enormous* number of white men in the USA, that is tens of millions, to get a null result from this particular data set, in the field of the countless billions of individual human interactions which every day life in the USA throws up, is beyond remarkable.

    The real upshot and takeaway from this is that white men are sexually repulsed from black women in an exceedingly powerful genetically determined way.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    @Anonymous

    "white men are sexually repulsed from black women in an exceedingly powerful genetically determined way."

    Along with the superficial reasons.

  79. Your math is wrong (or your title is wrong).
    Black victimized by Asians = 0.1% of 563,940 = 564 times.
    Asians victimized by blacks = 27.5% of 182,230=50,113 times.
    Actual ratio =89 times, not 275 times.

    Still a huge effect, but please check your math.

  80. @Polistra
    News flash! According to Google News and the Washington Post, Trump has admitted total defeat in the War on Covid-19. You weren't thinking of voting for him, were you? No, I didn't think you were. Glad we could help.


    https://i.ibb.co/XtTfNWS/20201025-232711.jpg

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro

    Not that it needed confirmation, but thanks for confirming what most thoughtful people already know, that the WaPo are shills for the Ruling Class, just like the rest of the State Media.

    Here is how the “pandemic” is working. People are not actually dying much of the Wuhan Flu anymore. Cuomo (NY) and Murphy (NJ) have already killed off many of the risky folks, those over 70 living in retirement warehouses, by forcing infected oldsters into them.

    Testing has ramped up, so more cases are being identified. With deaths trailing off, the State Media switched to cases. Of course, more positive cases with flat deaths mean the actual observed fatality rate of the Wuhan Flu drops off sharply. More people, particularly children, die of the regular flu.

    Leftists of course are still afraid of the Wuhan Flu. (Leftists are very easy to frighten with fairy tales — like little girls in that way). So they will hide in their basement and not turn out to vote. Once again, the Democrats only hope for winning a national election rest of their industrial-scale voter fraud.

    • Agree: Hangnail Hans
  81. @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    The Black-White change seems to be largely a shifting of the “other” category.

    The Hispanic-Black change is a bit anomalous; partly explained by a shifting of the “other” category; and maybe some shifting of Asian to Hispanic.

  82. @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    Careful. Fix a race (say, black). If victimization were race-blind, then perps in attacks on blacks would be proportional to the background population: 60% white (non-hispanic) and 13.5% black.

    In reality it’s not so simple. We expect to see disparities in proportions, as blacks live among blacks more often than among whites. If the races were uniformly violent, blacks would account for much more than 13.5% of perps in crime on blacks. Likewise, they would account for much less than 13.5% of perps in crime on whites.

  83. @Anon
    Honestly I’m shocked it’s not an infinite ratio. Must include gang violence. I hear Vietnamese gangs sometimes run afoul of black gangs.

    Replies: @MikeJa

    I’m guessing the 276th incidents are mostly well-justified retaliation

  84. @Trelane
    I'm surprised Asian Triads, Tongs, Yakuza don't kill more blacks.

    Replies: @El Dato, @TWS

    Their violence is directed inward.

  85. @Sam Helix
    Is there any explanation why violent assaults on black victims by white offenders increased from 10.6% to 18.2%% in the space of a year? It means that in 2019, whites committed a higher percentage of attacks on blacks than blacks did on whites.

    And violent assaults on Hispanics by blacks doubled from 15.3% to 32.2%. Doesn't that seem unlikely? Am I reading this thing wrong!?

    Replies: @anon, @Travis, @Jim Bob Lassiter, @bomag, @Alan Mercer, @TWS

    Hispanic is a victim category, white is the criminal category.

    • LOL: bomag
  86. @duncsbaby
    @Reg Cæsar

    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

    Replies: @Kronos, @Reg Cæsar

    I bet Kamala Devi listed herself as Caucasian on her immigration form.

    I think she was legally a Briton, like her mother. She would have come to America under the 1920s’ quotas.

  87. “Has anybody studied the effect on the mental health of crime victims of the Racial Reckoning?”

    IMO not good. How about a study on the effect of CRT on the Portland kult kids. Where are the charts and graphs? Nerds.

  88. @Morton's toes
    The last time I went to the gun range there were more Chinese people than anybody else. At least 60%. Maybe the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed Al Quada had back in October 2001.

    ha ha just kidding! : ) : )

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @ThisIsAnon153Replying, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Astuteobservor II, @SunBakedSuburb

    “the Chinese Commies have sleeper cells like the stupid FBI claimed”

    The Chinese acquired ownership of the Democratic Party beginning with the Clintons, Diane Feinstein, and Max Baucus. Eight years of Obama/Holder transformed the FBI into an American NKVD. It would not be shocking if the FBI was running cover for CCP spies whilst chasing down those dangerous white nationalists who targeted Gretchen Whitmer; a lady who is perfectly sane and definitely not creepy.

  89. @Anonymous
    @eric

    'Statistical zero' - that is as close as non existent as you can possibly get.

    Considering the *enormous* number of white men in the USA, that is tens of millions, to get a null result from this particular data set, in the field of the countless billions of individual human interactions which every day life in the USA throws up, is beyond remarkable.

    The real upshot and takeaway from this is that white men are sexually repulsed from black women in an exceedingly powerful genetically determined way.

    Replies: @SunBakedSuburb

    “white men are sexually repulsed from black women in an exceedingly powerful genetically determined way.”

    Along with the superficial reasons.

  90. @Old and Grumpy
    Take Philadelphia. Most of the vibrant neighborhoods are food deserts except for the local tiny shops owned by an Asian. The cops have been made useless over time since the days of Rizzo. Actually I don't think they even go into North or West Philly unless it is to pick up a corpse. So yeah I can believe Asians see more crime.

    Replies: @Travis

    50,100 Asians were victimized by blacks in 2018 or .24% of the Asian population
    537,200 whites were victimized by blacks in 2018 of .27% of the White population

    So Whites were more likely to be victimized by Blacks compared to Asians in 2018

    I attended school in North Philadelphia, on Girard Ave.. Took the El and the Broad Street Subway to get to my high School from Upper Darby each day. Got mugged once on Girard Ave walking to the subway with 2 kids who brandished a baseball bat back in 1986. Each year a few kids would get mugged walking to the subway. One of my classmates lost the vision in hie eye after being savagely attacked walking down the steps to the subway. Missed about 3 weeks of school, was hospitalized for a few days. He was Chinese, They took nothing from him, just beat him unconscious. He was surprised they did not his expensive watch, but it was nit a mugging, just another vicious hate crime.

  91. @Mycale
    Back before the media realized they could use COVID-19 to try to sink Trump's re-election, they talked a lot about how it was being fueled by anti-Asian racism, and breathlessly reported on every anti-Asian incident. Despite the fact that we could all easily see who was the one doing it whenever they found the suspect, the media worked very hard to blame, who else, white people.

    I have witnessed a few COVID-fueled incidents of verbal abuse this year, and not surprisingly, it was blacks yelling and harassing Asians each time.

    Replies: @Alden

    I remember that. Mostly NYC street and subway incidents. Everybody knew it was black or Hispanic in Asian violence. But the articles implied the violence was committed by descendants of the evil Whites who pushed thru the Chinese exclusion acts. 120 years ago. There was always an editorial about White discrimination and prejudice towards Chinese 130,140 years ago. And of course the WW2, detention camps on the west coast.

    No mention the camps were only for ethnic Japanese while the numerous Chinese and Philippinos were left alone

  92. I’m disappointed at twisting the numbers. Just look at per capita rates.

    The Black offender rate is almost twice as high as the White rate.
    The Asian offender rate is slightly more than half the White rate.

    The White victimization rate is almost double that of Asians.

    These 2-to-1 ratios are more meaningful than the 275+ headline.

  93. You’re understating the case. Blacks victimized Asians approximately 50,000 times, while the number of Asian victimizations of blacks was under ten. The real rate is over 5,000 times greater, not 275.

  94. @prime noticer
    when did asians violently victimize blacks?

    i want to actually see this.

    pics or it didn't happen, as they say.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666

    when did asians violently victimize blacks?

    i want to actually see this.

    pics or it didn’t happen, as they say.

  95. @Anonymous
    Asians in my experience are more naive and trusting of blacks than whites are, and more inclined to actually believe the "we're all the same" nonsense.

    Many if not most whites genuinely see blacks as violent and dangerous and deliberately avoid them, even if most whites wouldn't admit it. In contrast I get the impression that Asians are more naive about the threat blacks pose and don't actually see the danger, or not until it's too late at least.

    I believe this is some of the reason why Asians are basically the only non-blacks prepared to operate businesses in black areas, they're actually quite naive to the dangers of being in these areas.

    Replies: @Marty, @Slimer

    You might be right. Still, I was amazed a few years ago on the golf course when a guy in his 60’s, a kiwi fruit marketer who looked like a cross between Jack Kemp and Burl Ives, told me that blacks “are just like us.” Oh, he was also about to visit “the reservation” in Okla.

  96. The best of Steve Sailer.

    Provocative, disturbing, clear.

    Thanks for this. I will use it at my family’s Thanksgiving dinner to make it clear to anyone who may doubt otherwise the color of crime.

  97. @anonymous
    @Jim Christian

    What? Jews commit hardly any street crime, in the US, Israel, or any other country. The exceptions, like the Son of Sam guy, or Hyman Roth, are memorable because they are rare.

    Replies: @Father O'Hara

    Its kept hidden. Here on the North Shore,Jewish gangs like the Bar Mitzvah Boys, the Trust Fund Thugs, and the Stone Cold Landsmen wreak havoc. Beatings,rapes,robbery,drugs,killings are at epidemic levels. They call this the Goldman Ghetto. Sad.

  98. Lets not forget the vast majority of attacks against Asians this year due to the “Chinese cold that kills old people” were by blacks.

  99. @Astuteobservor II
    @Morton's toes

    I talked to my local Chinese takeout owner. He was scared of the blm riots. So he loaded up on guns and ammo. Even though the town he was living in was 99% white.

    And it wasn't just him, he told me the Chinese in the USA communicate and keep each other up to date on wechat. Most of the Chinese he knows are all stocking up on guns and ammos.

    I am 100% sure if blacks attempt home invasions on them will get shot at. Their most watched video is of a Asian lady shooting 3 home invaders. She killed one out of the 3.

    Replies: @right wing Jew

    I hope that means they will be voting R like they supposedly did in 2014 after Ferguson, which I have been predicting for months. This presages a potential R landslide in unexpected places. There is no way R voting Asians are being picked up in these polls.

    If you worried about your shop burning down, why on Earth would you vote for Biden?

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    @right wing Jew

    Trump is the sitting president over the blm riots.

    You have it backwards?

  100. @RichardTaylor
    Asians know Blacks are more criminal. Everyone does. Won't change how they vote.

    Do you think White liberals, women, Jews or any other group doesn't wet their pants at the thought of being in a Black neighborhood, especially after dark?

    They'll lie through their teeth about it because White men provide them protection anyway. Even though they demonize White men.

    Replies: @right wing Jew

    Nah, brother, Asians change their vote in riot years. Look at the exit polls in 2014 after Ferguson. Asians are probably the most flexible group in terms of vote. They do vote Dem normally, but there is no way in hell that Chong Foo Suk or whatever is voting for Biden after Golden Garden got torched.

  101. Anon[611] • Disclaimer says:

    If Biden wins, I anticipate the mainstream media to again report at least a little more honestly about things like this black/asian interracial crime ratio.

    If we simply allow blacks to commit minor shoplifts and misdemeanor assaults, it will curtail talented immigration eventually. Cant have that.

    Blacks are being used by our elites. Our elites.hate them almost as much as they hate us. Almost.

  102. We really need to hear from Twinkie on this…

  103. @eric
    Not reporting the small number of Black on Asian crime reminds me of the interracial rape data. At one point the white-on-Black rape count was so low, they just stopped reporting it.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Donald A Thomson

    In Australia it’s quite common for European men to have Aboriginal girlfriends. That only depends on their living somewhere where Aborigines also live.

    If you only go on talk, they’re the most racist Australians but they love their children and their wives if they’re still with them. All I’ve ever met complain about some of their wives’ families and two have scars from knife wounds inflicted by their wives (it’s more likely that an Aborigine will reach for a weapon).

    That means that many find Aboriginal women sufficiently attractive and they’re no more attractive than US Blacks. Perhaps the US rape statistics just reflect the reality that US Blacks are much more violent than US Whites. Also, US Blacks may be more racist than US Whites. There’s a whole political movement trying to persuade US Blacks that they should be. [email protected]

  104. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jim Christian

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/16/uk-supreme-court-backs-housing-charitys-jewish-only-rule


    A woman seeking housing in east London who alleged racial discrimination when a housing charity reserved its properties for Orthodox Jewish people has lost her case at the supreme court.

    In a ruling that cements positive discrimination as a legitimate way to tackle social disadvantage, the UK’s highest court of appeal found in favour of the Agudas Israel housing association in Stamford Hill after it listed its homes for rent with the caveat of “consideration only to the Orthodox Jewish community”.

    A lawyer for the non-Jewish woman, who has not been named, argued that the policy “smacked of ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’,” a reference to signs pinned up by some landlords decades ago.

    But the high court, the court of appeal and now the supreme court have all ruled it was legal because it overcame the social and economic disadvantage faced by the community of Haredi Jews in the area. Some do not speak English and face antisemitism, partly because of their traditional dress.

    The charity’s 470 homes were listed by the London borough of Hackney as part of the wider social housing supply, which is under pressure in that part of the capital. Six of them came up during a period when the complainant, a mother of four, was at the top of the waiting list, but she was offered none. She alleged that the council and housing charity were letting Orthodox Jewish families “jump the queue”.

    The housing association’s charitable objectives state it is “primarily for the benefit of the Orthodox Jewish community”. The application form for housing asks if applicants are “strictly observant of shabbath and kashrut [dietary laws]”, which synagogue and schools they use and whether they are ethnically “Orthodox Jewish Ashkenazi” or “Orthodox Jewish Sephardic”.
     

    As journalist Christina Patterson found out, anti-Gentilism is a thing in Stamford Hill - it's just not a concept the law recognises.

    Replies: @right wing Jew, @photondancer, @bomag

    Anyone can convert to Orthodox Judaism, which is the catch there, so its technically open to anyone like any HOA or condo complex. Simply follow the rules. There are black Ultra Orthodox Jews that are considered Lithuanian Jews. Ergo, there is no ethnic consideration. I have orthodox family married to the ugliest apes with hellspawned children. *shrug emoji*

    eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natan_Gamedze

  105. @Anonymous
    Asians in my experience are more naive and trusting of blacks than whites are, and more inclined to actually believe the "we're all the same" nonsense.

    Many if not most whites genuinely see blacks as violent and dangerous and deliberately avoid them, even if most whites wouldn't admit it. In contrast I get the impression that Asians are more naive about the threat blacks pose and don't actually see the danger, or not until it's too late at least.

    I believe this is some of the reason why Asians are basically the only non-blacks prepared to operate businesses in black areas, they're actually quite naive to the dangers of being in these areas.

    Replies: @Marty, @Slimer

    More brave, you meant. White men are chickens unless they’ve got a gun, and a room full of unarmed people to kill. Preferably children.

    • Troll: West reanimator
  106. @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Guy De Champlagne

    "We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones."

    WTF is that supposed to mean? Margaret Sanger was certain (and was right) that we had long arrived at that solution in terms of medical science.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

    Even using traditional methods the ability to affect culture is less than the ability to affect genetics. If you give (or force upon) a couple someone elses kids than that child has the genetics of the biological parent, full stop. But the culture of the adopted child will be much more complex. The kid will partially take on the culture of adopted parents, but will still seek out a distinct identity and find cultural influences elsewhere that a biological child would not (especially if the the child doesn’t look like the adopted parents e.g. a black child adopted by whites will seek out a black identity and culture in a way that a white couples white child would not).

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
    @Guy De Champlagne

    Maybe we'll see how that works out with Amy Coney Barrett's two adopted Haitian timoun.

    I'd like to be the fly on the wall at her house when she is forced to explain to them why Haiti is a shithole.

  107. @right wing Jew
    @Astuteobservor II

    I hope that means they will be voting R like they supposedly did in 2014 after Ferguson, which I have been predicting for months. This presages a potential R landslide in unexpected places. There is no way R voting Asians are being picked up in these polls.

    If you worried about your shop burning down, why on Earth would you vote for Biden?

    Replies: @Astuteobservor II

    Trump is the sitting president over the blm riots.

    You have it backwards?

  108. @RichardTaylor
    @Guy De Champlagne

    We’re closer to being able to reliably remedy genetic differences than cultural ones.

    Someday that may be true but I don't see it in this century.

    Replies: @Guy De Champlagne

    The ability to give a couple a child that is theirs just with the bad genetic parts remedied is way closer than the ability to give a child the parents culture just with all the bad cultural parts remedied. It’s inconceivable how the latter would even work. I guess it would involve raising the children by robots or with strict computer oversight of the parents.

    Trying to predict the pace and nature of technological change is ultimately a fool’s errand.

    • Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @Guy De Champlagne

    Why would black parents genetically alter their children to have white genes to help them act white ? Black females have this option today, they have access to white sperm but typically they choose thug sperm over other types of sperm.

    Thus, even if the technology was available today, few blacks would use the technology. They would be more likely to genetically alter their offspring if it would make their children taller, stronger and more athletic to increase the odds of having children who are professional athletes.

  109. I well remember the days following 9/11 in the UK.

    The only open public expressed racial hostility I witnessed then was of a young black woman starting to rant at group of Pakistani women saying things like “I hate all you Pakis, you smell..”.

  110. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jim Christian

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/16/uk-supreme-court-backs-housing-charitys-jewish-only-rule


    A woman seeking housing in east London who alleged racial discrimination when a housing charity reserved its properties for Orthodox Jewish people has lost her case at the supreme court.

    In a ruling that cements positive discrimination as a legitimate way to tackle social disadvantage, the UK’s highest court of appeal found in favour of the Agudas Israel housing association in Stamford Hill after it listed its homes for rent with the caveat of “consideration only to the Orthodox Jewish community”.

    A lawyer for the non-Jewish woman, who has not been named, argued that the policy “smacked of ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’,” a reference to signs pinned up by some landlords decades ago.

    But the high court, the court of appeal and now the supreme court have all ruled it was legal because it overcame the social and economic disadvantage faced by the community of Haredi Jews in the area. Some do not speak English and face antisemitism, partly because of their traditional dress.

    The charity’s 470 homes were listed by the London borough of Hackney as part of the wider social housing supply, which is under pressure in that part of the capital. Six of them came up during a period when the complainant, a mother of four, was at the top of the waiting list, but she was offered none. She alleged that the council and housing charity were letting Orthodox Jewish families “jump the queue”.

    The housing association’s charitable objectives state it is “primarily for the benefit of the Orthodox Jewish community”. The application form for housing asks if applicants are “strictly observant of shabbath and kashrut [dietary laws]”, which synagogue and schools they use and whether they are ethnically “Orthodox Jewish Ashkenazi” or “Orthodox Jewish Sephardic”.
     

    As journalist Christina Patterson found out, anti-Gentilism is a thing in Stamford Hill - it's just not a concept the law recognises.

    Replies: @right wing Jew, @photondancer, @bomag

    Not speaking English shouldn’t count as a disadvantage, since it is entirely self-inflicted.

  111. @Guy De Champlagne
    @RichardTaylor

    The ability to give a couple a child that is theirs just with the bad genetic parts remedied is way closer than the ability to give a child the parents culture just with all the bad cultural parts remedied. It's inconceivable how the latter would even work. I guess it would involve raising the children by robots or with strict computer oversight of the parents.

    Trying to predict the pace and nature of technological change is ultimately a fool's errand.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Why would black parents genetically alter their children to have white genes to help them act white ? Black females have this option today, they have access to white sperm but typically they choose thug sperm over other types of sperm.

    Thus, even if the technology was available today, few blacks would use the technology. They would be more likely to genetically alter their offspring if it would make their children taller, stronger and more athletic to increase the odds of having children who are professional athletes.

  112. As I have mentioned previously my wife is viet and they are livid right now over black criminality targeting vietnamese and their businesses. Four years ago her family was apolitical but the events of the last few years have turned every one of them into fanatical Trump voters. This goes for American Vietnamese and those in Vietnam. My wife watches Trump rallies all the time now. I don’t want to repeat some of the stories she has told me about blacks robbing and assaulting vietnamese, and the media sure as hell doesn’t want anybody hearing about it either. On top of that she lived through the fall of Saigon and her family along with everyone else suffered from the communist takeover. She has been quite unnerved by this year’s civil unrest as it reminds her of those difficult times.

    As for Chinese, my business partner is from China and even he is voting for Trump because he says Biden is too old.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Elmer T. Jones


    but the events of the last few years have turned every one of them into fanatical Trump voters.
     
    Why? The Republican party is the epicenter of hyper-judeonegro Anglosphere conservatism. You'd have to be literally brain damaged to not understand this at this point in the game.
  113. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jim Christian

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/16/uk-supreme-court-backs-housing-charitys-jewish-only-rule


    A woman seeking housing in east London who alleged racial discrimination when a housing charity reserved its properties for Orthodox Jewish people has lost her case at the supreme court.

    In a ruling that cements positive discrimination as a legitimate way to tackle social disadvantage, the UK’s highest court of appeal found in favour of the Agudas Israel housing association in Stamford Hill after it listed its homes for rent with the caveat of “consideration only to the Orthodox Jewish community”.

    A lawyer for the non-Jewish woman, who has not been named, argued that the policy “smacked of ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’,” a reference to signs pinned up by some landlords decades ago.

    But the high court, the court of appeal and now the supreme court have all ruled it was legal because it overcame the social and economic disadvantage faced by the community of Haredi Jews in the area. Some do not speak English and face antisemitism, partly because of their traditional dress.

    The charity’s 470 homes were listed by the London borough of Hackney as part of the wider social housing supply, which is under pressure in that part of the capital. Six of them came up during a period when the complainant, a mother of four, was at the top of the waiting list, but she was offered none. She alleged that the council and housing charity were letting Orthodox Jewish families “jump the queue”.

    The housing association’s charitable objectives state it is “primarily for the benefit of the Orthodox Jewish community”. The application form for housing asks if applicants are “strictly observant of shabbath and kashrut [dietary laws]”, which synagogue and schools they use and whether they are ethnically “Orthodox Jewish Ashkenazi” or “Orthodox Jewish Sephardic”.
     

    As journalist Christina Patterson found out, anti-Gentilism is a thing in Stamford Hill - it's just not a concept the law recognises.

    Replies: @right wing Jew, @photondancer, @bomag

    So, I guess that in the future, everyone will belong to some kind of religious (“religious”) group that carves out and protects territory.

    Islam is correct about more than women.

  114. @Ben tillman
    @res

    And the real numbers are about 56 percent to 13.5 percent for a ration of 4.1:1.

    Replies: @res

    I take it you get those numbers by backing Hispanics out of “white” in a source like this?
    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219

    Note that link actually gives white alone numbers as well. 60.1%

    It is important to be consistent about whether Hispanics and whites are grouped or not.

  115. I have a suspicion that blacks who are victimized by Asians sometimes report their assailant as being white.

    Blacks seem to consider all non-blacks to be white.

  116. @Elmer T. Jones
    As I have mentioned previously my wife is viet and they are livid right now over black criminality targeting vietnamese and their businesses. Four years ago her family was apolitical but the events of the last few years have turned every one of them into fanatical Trump voters. This goes for American Vietnamese and those in Vietnam. My wife watches Trump rallies all the time now. I don't want to repeat some of the stories she has told me about blacks robbing and assaulting vietnamese, and the media sure as hell doesn't want anybody hearing about it either. On top of that she lived through the fall of Saigon and her family along with everyone else suffered from the communist takeover. She has been quite unnerved by this year's civil unrest as it reminds her of those difficult times.

    As for Chinese, my business partner is from China and even he is voting for Trump because he says Biden is too old.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    but the events of the last few years have turned every one of them into fanatical Trump voters.

    Why? The Republican party is the epicenter of hyper-judeonegro Anglosphere conservatism. You’d have to be literally brain damaged to not understand this at this point in the game.

  117. @Guy De Champlagne
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Even using traditional methods the ability to affect culture is less than the ability to affect genetics. If you give (or force upon) a couple someone elses kids than that child has the genetics of the biological parent, full stop. But the culture of the adopted child will be much more complex. The kid will partially take on the culture of adopted parents, but will still seek out a distinct identity and find cultural influences elsewhere that a biological child would not (especially if the the child doesn't look like the adopted parents e.g. a black child adopted by whites will seek out a black identity and culture in a way that a white couples white child would not).

    Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Maybe we’ll see how that works out with Amy Coney Barrett’s two adopted Haitian timoun.

    I’d like to be the fly on the wall at her house when she is forced to explain to them why Haiti is a shithole.

  118. @Jake
    And yet hordes of younger Asians have come to love the Numinous Negro and to hate in the name of and for the benefit of the Numinous Negro.

    Asians have asssimilated to WASP Elite cultural values.

    Replies: @njguy73, @Curle

    “And yet hordes of younger Asians have come to love the Numinous Negro”

    Seems to me they avoid them like the plague. And vice-versa.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS