Europe vs. Nigeria in Population
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Follow @steve_sailer
The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Commenters to ignore (one per line)
Commenters to follow (one per line)
Trim Comments?
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSSPastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
There goes the neighborhood.
OT, maybe, though there are those that say Syrian emphasis on population growth caused much of the problem there.
Seymour Hersh (of Mai Lai and Abu Ghraib note) is out with an article claiming there was never any US intelligence or evidence of that sarin gas attack in Syria, instead just the opposite.
“Trump‘s Red Line”, Seymour M. Hersh, Welt, 25-June-2017.
What happened had been coordinated between the Syrians, Russians, and Americans involved in the fighting (essentially the Russians gave the Syrians a guided-bomb to take out a high-level insurgent meeting in a multi-purpose building). They gave the US a head’s up so the US could keep any US intel assets out of the way. The building had a basement full of weapons, chlorine, and fertilizer (the goodies the insurgents doled out to the population). This all went up due to the direct hit of the 500 pound guided-bomb.
Over the next 100 years, the following will happen.
1. Automation will largely eliminate the need for human labor, removing the main rationale for mass immigration.
2. Immigrants will fiercely compete with natives for the scarce number of remaining non-automated jobs.
3. Many immigrants will end up on welfare (as there will be few non-automated jobs), sucking dry already scarce public resources.
4. Most Western countries will experience debt crisises that bring down the current political-economic order.
5. Extremist parties (ethnonationalist, labor, anarchist, socialist, Islamic) will flourish in this environment.
So, no, I don’t see billions of Africans moving to Europe. If a few million immigrants are already causing these many problems in a currently prosperous continent, how will Europe accomodate billions during the coming era of economic scarcity?
At some point, Europe will reach a breaking point. The only question is: When?
Magic Unicorn theory holds that 'economic growth' is merely a function of the volume of warm bodies packed into western nations. Now, as the theory goes, warm bodies aplenty are to be found in Africa, thus Europe 'needs' to pack them in to the fullest extent possible.
Dumb, vain politicians eager to 'look clever' for The Economist can be relied upon to implement Magic Unicorn.Replies: @Anonymous
So I finally sat down to read TCotS and was struck by the 1985 introduction:
The was a young woman
Who lived in Abuja
She had so many children
She sent them to Germany because Abuja is screwed
1. Automation will largely eliminate the need for human labor, removing the main rationale for mass immigration.
2. Immigrants will fiercely compete with natives for the scarce number of remaining non-automated jobs.
3. Many immigrants will end up on welfare (as there will be few non-automated jobs), sucking dry already scarce public resources.
4. Most Western countries will experience debt crisises that bring down the current political-economic order.
5. Extremist parties (ethnonationalist, labor, anarchist, socialist, Islamic) will flourish in this environment.
So, no, I don't see billions of Africans moving to Europe. If a few million immigrants are already causing these many problems in a currently prosperous continent, how will Europe accomodate billions during the coming era of economic scarcity?
At some point, Europe will reach a breaking point. The only question is: When?Replies: @Trelane, @Anonymous, @Issac
Europeans are delusional. They’re highly suggestible. They’re insane. Mad. In France, the public just elected Macron, a guy who is on record as saying France does not have a culture worth saving. The 19th century theory of social degeneracy appears to have become demonsterable fact in Europe. The European population is irredeemable and unfit. There are Europeans who believe Italy would benefit culturally from Libyan immigrants. Italy, the most culturally rich nation in the history of mankind would benefit from Libyans! Yes, the European has become insane. They will go extinct rapidly and rightly so because they are FUCKING INSANE!
Who lived in Abuja
She had so many children
She sent them to Germany because Abuja is screwedReplies: @Kyle McKenna
Ahh, reminds me of the old 2 Live Crew lyric:
So you see, as they themselves admit, Nigeria is much the same as America, and I’m sure they’ll all fit in just fine.
"All the King's horses and all the King's men
Couldn't put that fat mother****** together again"
Two points to note:
1/. By 2100, it’s likely that Europe itself will be mostly inhabited by a non-ethnic European, non-white population. As a ballpark estimate, allow for 400 million ethnically European European inhabitants.
2/.Of course, white Europeans will be outnumbered two-to-one by Nigerians in Nigeria alone. This does not include every other black African nationality. Or indeed every other non-white population in the world. Despite the Africa fixation of these threads, Asia will continue to be a population giant by 2100.
1. Automation will largely eliminate the need for human labor, removing the main rationale for mass immigration.
2. Immigrants will fiercely compete with natives for the scarce number of remaining non-automated jobs.
3. Many immigrants will end up on welfare (as there will be few non-automated jobs), sucking dry already scarce public resources.
4. Most Western countries will experience debt crisises that bring down the current political-economic order.
5. Extremist parties (ethnonationalist, labor, anarchist, socialist, Islamic) will flourish in this environment.
So, no, I don't see billions of Africans moving to Europe. If a few million immigrants are already causing these many problems in a currently prosperous continent, how will Europe accomodate billions during the coming era of economic scarcity?
At some point, Europe will reach a breaking point. The only question is: When?Replies: @Trelane, @Anonymous, @Issac
Sorry, but what you don’t seem to understand is that the ‘magic unicorn’ school of economic ‘thought’ holds sway amongst the political class – and will likely remain to do so.. Just read your Economist, WSJ etc.
Magic Unicorn theory holds that ‘economic growth’ is merely a function of the volume of warm bodies packed into western nations. Now, as the theory goes, warm bodies aplenty are to be found in Africa, thus Europe ‘needs’ to pack them in to the fullest extent possible.
Dumb, vain politicians eager to ‘look clever’ for The Economist can be relied upon to implement Magic Unicorn.
Of all the graphs Steve has put together on this topic, this one may best drive the point home.
1/. By 2100, it's likely that Europe itself will be mostly inhabited by a non-ethnic European, non-white population. As a ballpark estimate, allow for 400 million ethnically European European inhabitants.
2/.Of course, white Europeans will be outnumbered two-to-one by Nigerians in Nigeria alone. This does not include every other black African nationality. Or indeed every other non-white population in the world. Despite the Africa fixation of these threads, Asia will continue to be a population giant by 2100.Replies: @Steve Sailer
Asia will be about 1.06 times the population of Africa in 2100 compared to 6x bigger in 1950 and 4x bigger in 2000.
All it takes for this problem to go away is enough whites to remove the invaders (and the traitors who threw open the gates) on the one hand, and control of the strategic nuclear arsenal on the other.
Magic Unicorn theory holds that 'economic growth' is merely a function of the volume of warm bodies packed into western nations. Now, as the theory goes, warm bodies aplenty are to be found in Africa, thus Europe 'needs' to pack them in to the fullest extent possible.
Dumb, vain politicians eager to 'look clever' for The Economist can be relied upon to implement Magic Unicorn.Replies: @Anonymous
And it’s not as if a large part of the young Western population (think Corbynistas), many of them themselves precariats, wouldn’t prefer to add Third World nitro fuel to an Acceleration into socialist revolution against the Economist class (or die trying) than admit borders aren’t fascist and racist and stuff.
The UN will reply to you and set you straight. Give it a shot!
Followed by a verse about Humpty Dumpty IIRC
“All the King’s horses and all the King’s men
Couldn’t put that fat mother****** together again”
https://twitter.com/UNmigration/status/879225070014660609Replies: @spandrell
Tells you something that the UN can’t even write its own reports and has to link to McKinsey.
Seymour Hersh (of Mai Lai and Abu Ghraib note) is out with an article claiming there was never any US intelligence or evidence of that sarin gas attack in Syria, instead just the opposite.
"Trump‘s Red Line", Seymour M. Hersh, Welt, 25-June-2017.
What happened had been coordinated between the Syrians, Russians, and Americans involved in the fighting (essentially the Russians gave the Syrians a guided-bomb to take out a high-level insurgent meeting in a multi-purpose building). They gave the US a head's up so the US could keep any US intel assets out of the way. The building had a basement full of weapons, chlorine, and fertilizer (the goodies the insurgents doled out to the population). This all went up due to the direct hit of the 500 pound guided-bomb.Replies: @Chrisnonymous
LOL. Some or most of this article might be true, but paragraph 3 is baloney.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/where-would-we-be-politically-if-hillary-clinton-had-won.html
OT, but in response to #17 I wouldn’t be so sure:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/where-would-we-be-politically-if-hillary-clinton-had-won.html
1. Automation will largely eliminate the need for human labor, removing the main rationale for mass immigration.
2. Immigrants will fiercely compete with natives for the scarce number of remaining non-automated jobs.
3. Many immigrants will end up on welfare (as there will be few non-automated jobs), sucking dry already scarce public resources.
4. Most Western countries will experience debt crisises that bring down the current political-economic order.
5. Extremist parties (ethnonationalist, labor, anarchist, socialist, Islamic) will flourish in this environment.
So, no, I don't see billions of Africans moving to Europe. If a few million immigrants are already causing these many problems in a currently prosperous continent, how will Europe accomodate billions during the coming era of economic scarcity?
At some point, Europe will reach a breaking point. The only question is: When?Replies: @Trelane, @Anonymous, @Issac
I’d take issue with a few of those.
1. Economics hasn’t been the primary excuse for immigration, just a tertiary back-up for when the proles become uneasy. Merkel didn’t open Germany’s doors proclaiming a labour shortage. She did so because of “humanitarian,” reasons. We can, of course, doubt this and guess at the actual motives; however, to assume Germany corporations thought that MENA immigrants were perfect for their highly technical job market is quite dubious. Germans may be idealists, but that’s a stretch.
2. Immigrants, on the whole, are in no position to compete for skilled labor jobs. Natives will fight it out for increasingly scarce skilled labor sectors, but immigrants will largely form political dependent blocs not unlike Africans in America. They’ll agitate for more set-asides until the welfare states break down.
3. Yes.
4. That’s been inevitable since the fiat machine began pumping, but I don’t see any reason that is has to happen at one point or another. It’s kept going by the powers that be agreeing not to call any bluffs. Massive social welfare collapse could trigger it, but who knows.
5. Depends entirely on how resilient the establishment is and how their opinions on the matter evolve. Right now it’s entirely possible they’ll continue to suppress anything right-wing, particularly ethnat, well beyond the point of no return. If they do this, Islamist parties will absolutely use that to dominate. But the reverse is possible too if the establishment has a change of plan. It’s hard to know what the brahmins are thinking. Leftists, Anarchists, and Socialists will be no more of a nuisance than they already are. They’re very effeminate when they aren’t state-funded and with more powerful Islamists, who no longer need to humor them, on the streets many of them will be afraid.
In my opinion, Europe’s breaking point is entirely a function of what her elites want. The EU states have utterly savaged their right-wing political opponents to the point where opposition is more or less toothless. So mass immigration will continue unabated until either they have a change of plans or when Islamists get a civil war kicked off. Having nothing to go on right now but what’s transpired in the last two years, I’d say they’re all-in with population replacement and Islam will dictate when the struggle begins. If Muslims are wise, they’ll bide their time until it’s too late and only begin the political conquest and enslavement once their host countries are less than half European. That’s only a few decades off so time is very-much on their side.
I must say that she would be vastly better off w/o that greasy pimp and his fiddle . I suspect he would toss his fiddle aside , shout Allah Akbar and sell her to the first jihadi that came along with a bowl of rice . White men do have their faults .
Indeed.