The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Dept. of Oops: Another Hate Hoax
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From Slate on December 4, 2016:

NY Subway Riders Stand By as Three Men Verbally Assault Muslim Teenager,”

Dec. 4, 2016:

Three white men who were apparently intoxicated repeatedly yelled anti-Islam insults at a Muslim student in the New York City subway and no one did anything. The men, who yelled “Donald Trump!” several times and even tried to pull off the terrified 18-year-old’s hijab, also accused her of being a terrorist. This all took place at around 10 p.m. on Thursday night on the 6 train as Yasmin Seweid was returning home from Baruch College.

“I heard them talk, but I had my headphones in, I wasn’t really listening, I had a long day. And they came closer and I distinctly heard them saying, ‘Donald Trump,’ ” she told the local CBS affiliate. Although there have been a spate of racist incidents across the United States since the election, this one was particularly shocking because it happened in New York and it seem no one tried to step in to help Seweid. …

This marks the latest in a growing wave of these types of incidents in New York and across the country (Slate is compiling a running list). From Nov. 8 through Nov. 27, New York law enforcement officials said there were 34 reported incidents, compared with 13 in the same period last year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xWkatHv7LE

From Slate on December 14, 2016:

NYPD Says Story About Muslim Teenager Being Verbally Assaulted on Subway Is a Hoax

By Daniel Politi

Update, Dec. 14, 2016: Nearly two weeks after what appeared to be a horrifying incident on the New York City subway, the NYPD announced that the apparent hate crime never happened, and Muslim teenager Yasmin Seweid made up the story that she was harassed by three drunk white men on the subway who shouted Trump slogans and tried to pull off her hijab. The 18-year-old has been charged with filing a false report and obstructing governmental administration.

From the NY Daily News today:

The police source said criminally charging her was appropriate.

“This isn’t something we normally like to do but she had numerous opportunities to admit nothing happened and she kept sticking by her story,” the source said.

“We dedicated a lot of resources to this — and don’t get me wrong, this is what we do — but we had guys going back and forth, looking for video and witnesses. And we couldn’t find anything.

“Nothing happened — and there was no victim.”

It wasn’t immediately clear what Seweid hoped to gain by lying to police.

I dunno … She’s an 18 year old girl … What do 18 year old girls like? Attention? Their picture being taken? Social media likes? Praise? Pity? Hurting people they don’t like? Doing what their culture tells them to do? Attention?

Since the concept of “hate hoax” still doesn’t exist in the minds of the mainstream media, the odds of getting in trouble for lying are small as long as you are crafty like Jackie Coakley and Don’t Talk to the Cops.

Talk to the media, but don’t get the law involved.

This massively publicized hoax wasn’t Fake News because you are hateful.

 
• Tags: Fake News 
Hide 125 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I’m in full Chernyshevsky mode with these media-credibility-destroying hoaxes: the worse the better.

    Everything the media does to beclown itself is one step closer to full enlightenment. Exhibit B for today is Julia Ioffe:
    https://www.poynter.org/2016/politico-severs-ties-with-writer-after-vulgar-trump-tweet/442889/

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Here is what Emily Lenzer at The Atlantic had to say about Ioffe, a recent hire by Jeffrey Goldberg:

    Julia Ioffe made a mistake today on Twitter, which she regrets and for which she has publicly apologized. We're confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.
     
    Another recent hire is Franklin Foer of the New Republic.
    , @anonymous
    Let's see if Tim Wise gets in trouble for this gem
    https://twitter.com/timjacobwise/status/809188697002409988
  2. Towanda!
    or
    Tawana!

    The cry of the lonely.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Towanda!
    or
    Tawana!
     
    No, Taqiyya!
    , @Langley
    From American Renaissance.

    Yasmin and Tawana have the same profile.

    http://www.amren.com/podcasts/2016/12/crying-trump-latest-hate-crime-hoaxes/

  3. But it’s no hoax that those wearing MAGA hats got attacked in bunch of places.

  4. The trick is to set the identities against one another

  5. Then of course there’s THIS one, where a black man committed arson against the white mother of his four mulatto babies and left a “hate crime” note declaring it the work of the KKK and Trump voters:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4029134/Florida-man-faked-pro-Trump-hate-crime-set-ex-s-car-fire-staged-kidnapping-ransom-note-covered-blood-said-taken-member-KKK.html

    Gov. Greaseball in New York is of course eating this stuff up… every fake “hate crime” is another excuse to expand his fascist police state:

    http://nypost.com/2016/11/20/cuomo-creating-statewide-anti-hate-crime-force/

  6. Speaking of hate hoaxes (and fake news!), get a load of this article in today’s SF Examiner:

    District officials have been trying to shift the culture at San Francisco’s flagship public high school after a racially charged incident infuriated black students last spring, but the election of Donald Trump hasn’t made their job any easier.

    Four students reportedly scrawled a handful of swastikas and “Fuck Donald Trump” on campus last month in the wake of the president-elect’s apparent victory, according to the Lowell Parent, Teacher, Student Association.

    “This is just a miniature version of what’s going on all around the country,” said Missy Sue Mastel, past-president of the Lowell PTSA.

    The graffiti appeared on campus despite Lowell and the San Francisco Unified School District rolling out diversity and anti-racist training for faculty at the school over the summer in response to an incident last school year…

    The headline and bulk of the article play this like Trump is causing hate incidents. And what’s the incident itself?

    Four students reportedly scrawled a handful of swastikas and “Fuck Donald Trump” on campus last month in the wake of the president-elect’s apparent victory

    In other words, this is actually anti-Trump graffiti!!! As with the Philly swastikas, these are not pro-Nazi graffiti, they are lefty comments about their perception of Trump.

    Now, I suppose that it is feasible that the Examiner considers anti-Trump graffiti as a “hate crime”, but I don’t believe it for one second. It appears to me to be another case of a writer being remarkably obtuse and trying to jam a round peg in a square hole.

    http://www.sfexaminer.com/trumps-election-reinvigorates-hate-sfs-public-schools/

    • Replies: @SPMoore8
    I think the proper spin here is that people who object to Donald Trump are anti-semites and Nazis. Let's run with it.
  7. I propose that she moves to Saudi Arabia where she will never be at risk for such behavior.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    Seconded.
  8. This stuff might also happen because New York’s nutty mayor encourages it.

  9. We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.

    • Replies: @Dr. X

    We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.
     
    ...perpetrated by other People of Color, Tiny Dick... not whites.
    , @The most deplorable one
    I see that the list of hate crime hoaxes has got this one already:

    http://infogalactic.com/info/Hate_crime_hoaxes

    If you look at the discussion page they were just waiting for this one to be confirmed.
    , @fish
    ....sigh.


    You're mailing it in Tiny.....I've come to expect better from you!
  10. This story somehow missed being on the evening news. These hoaxes will continue apace.

  11. Why is she in a hijab yet wearing full American-style makeup? I thought the whole purpose of hijabs was to downplay women’s sexuality. Doesn’t makeup sort of undo that? This, in my opinion, is the worst of both worlds: Old-style religion mixed with modern hypocrisy.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all so, this is technically not a real hijab. This is another type of garment altogether, that is known in Arabic as an " effu ". It's purpose is to allow a girl to still display her femininity, and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.
    , @Seth Largo
    I regularly see Muslim women wearing a) a hijab, and b) skin tight jeans that accentuate every curve.
  12. Donald Trump as hate speech. That’s a bit much even by today’s standards.

  13. @Langley
    Towanda!
    or
    Tawana!

    The cry of the lonely.

    Towanda!
    or
    Tawana!

    No, Taqiyya!

    • LOL: Ivy
  14. This strikes me as weak tea.

    I don’t live in New York but it is my persistent impression that New Yorkers are often rude to one another.

  15. All my left-wing friends were sharing this story on Facebook when it was going around. I’m quite sure that if they hear it was a hoax that that will make no impression on them. They’ll be just as likely to share the next such story. For them, wallowing in horror and pity about fake backlash against Muslims helps them suppress negative thoughts aroused by actual Muslim terrorism.

    • Replies: @Hhsiii
    Yeah, I knew this story was fake as soon as I heard it. I have been riding that subway line for 40+ years daily. But why bother getting into it on Facebook? It's amazing how unhinged many of my friends have become. I'm embarrassed for them.
    , @jake
    True. Liberals almost never allow themselves to learn from things like hate-crime hoaxes. If they did, at least 90% of their Liberalism would dissipate, much of it into nothing.
  16. Last week on FB, I called this incident a hoax and received a torrent of verbal abuse.

    Feels good, man. (Insert Pepe)

    • LOL: NickG
  17. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @MC
    I'm in full Chernyshevsky mode with these media-credibility-destroying hoaxes: the worse the better.

    Everything the media does to beclown itself is one step closer to full enlightenment. Exhibit B for today is Julia Ioffe:
    https://www.poynter.org/2016/politico-severs-ties-with-writer-after-vulgar-trump-tweet/442889/

    Here is what Emily Lenzer at The Atlantic had to say about Ioffe, a recent hire by Jeffrey Goldberg:

    Julia Ioffe made a mistake today on Twitter, which she regrets and for which she has publicly apologized. We’re confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.

    Another recent hire is Franklin Foer of the New Republic.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Not a lot of concern for ethnic diversity at Goldberg's Atlantic.
    , @Anonymous
    Also Foer is a purveyor of what is now called "fake news".

    Here is Ioffe back in October tweeting her "badass" co-ethnic now co-worker's story that was shopped around and picked up by lowly Slate:

    Julia Ioffe @juliaioffe

    Trump Tower had a special server to communicate with Russia's Alfa Bank, reports the eternal badass @FranklinFoer.

     

    , @Jim Don Bob
    Franklin Foer was editor of the New Republic when he published this fiction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Thomas_Beauchamp_controversy.

    He will fit right in at the Atlantic.
  18. @Anonymous
    Here is what Emily Lenzer at The Atlantic had to say about Ioffe, a recent hire by Jeffrey Goldberg:

    Julia Ioffe made a mistake today on Twitter, which she regrets and for which she has publicly apologized. We're confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.
     
    Another recent hire is Franklin Foer of the New Republic.

    Not a lot of concern for ethnic diversity at Goldberg’s Atlantic.

    • Replies: @MC
    What are you talking about? They have Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Mizrahim...
    , @SPMoore8
    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn't need them anymore (he's independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There's just no market for print media nowadays.
    , @Anonymous
    Now that's where you're wrong.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/press-releases/


    Franklin Foer to Write for The Atlantic Magazine
    Dec 11, 2016

    The Atlantic Hires Julia Ioffe to Cover Politics and Foreign Policy
    Recent hires include McKay Coppins on politics, Culture Editor Jane Yong Kim, and Sarah Zhang on science, tech, and health
    Dec 6, 2016

    “Inclusion in Silicon Valley: An Atlantic Workshop,” in Mountain View, CA on December 14th
    The Atlantic’s first daylong summit focused on gender, racial & economic disparities in Silicon Valley
    Dec 5, 2016

     

  19. @Laugh Track
    Speaking of hate hoaxes (and fake news!), get a load of this article in today's SF Examiner:

    District officials have been trying to shift the culture at San Francisco’s flagship public high school after a racially charged incident infuriated black students last spring, but the election of Donald Trump hasn’t made their job any easier.

    Four students reportedly scrawled a handful of swastikas and “Fuck Donald Trump” on campus last month in the wake of the president-elect’s apparent victory, according to the Lowell Parent, Teacher, Student Association.

    “This is just a miniature version of what’s going on all around the country,” said Missy Sue Mastel, past-president of the Lowell PTSA.

    The graffiti appeared on campus despite Lowell and the San Francisco Unified School District rolling out diversity and anti-racist training for faculty at the school over the summer in response to an incident last school year...
     
    The headline and bulk of the article play this like Trump is causing hate incidents. And what's the incident itself?

    Four students reportedly scrawled a handful of swastikas and “Fuck Donald Trump” on campus last month in the wake of the president-elect’s apparent victory
     
    In other words, this is actually anti-Trump graffiti!!! As with the Philly swastikas, these are not pro-Nazi graffiti, they are lefty comments about their perception of Trump.

    Now, I suppose that it is feasible that the Examiner considers anti-Trump graffiti as a "hate crime", but I don't believe it for one second. It appears to me to be another case of a writer being remarkably obtuse and trying to jam a round peg in a square hole.

    http://www.sfexaminer.com/trumps-election-reinvigorates-hate-sfs-public-schools/

    I think the proper spin here is that people who object to Donald Trump are anti-semites and Nazis. Let’s run with it.

  20. @Steve Sailer
    Not a lot of concern for ethnic diversity at Goldberg's Atlantic.

    What are you talking about? They have Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Mizrahim…

    • Agree: Bill Jones
    • Replies: @Anonym
    There are also male and female, maybe some genderfluid.

    Model T diversity. You can have any writer you like, as long as...

  21. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    People who tell lies like these are both victims and perpetrators.

    I wouldn’t waste my sympathy on them, but they are brainwashed tools of PC.

    It’s like Hitler Youth and Red Guards. Yes, they did terrible things. They were monsters, but they were also dupes and puppets.

    It used to be that pulling a fire alarm was a prank. Not funny but a prank.

    But these new alarm-pullers are not pranksters. They are real cranksters, but then, who made them that way? Why are so many acting like this? This isn’t an isolated incident. They are all over. All over colleges, all over high schools, all over neighborhoods. And they’ve been enabled and encouraged by the powers-that-be in colleges who either turned a blind eye or exploited the crisis to push an agenda. Even after the KKK hoax was exposed at Oberlin, it was used as a teachable moment. At Mizzou, people got fired while the scumbags were put on a pedestal. This Victim Complex has been promoted by the Powers that be. There is a pattern here, and it’s part of a political mentality, just like the mindset of the Cultural Revolution.

    So, it misses the point to focus on this girl. Yes, she deserves to be punished. But blaming her is like blaming a Red Guard without pointing the finger at Mao who gave green light to the madness and orchestrated it through national media and networks. It’s like denouncing the Hitler Youth who attacked a Jewish business without mentioning the Nazi Powers That Be encouraged such mindset and behavior.

    Now, unlike Nazi Germany or Maoist China, there is no single all-powerful figure who gave the go-ahead to SJW nuttery. But the nexus of the Powers-that-be from media to academia to government have been encouraging and enabling this kind of crazed SJW mindset in young people and from a young age.

    [MORE]

    When young children are drummed day in and day out about ‘white privilege’ and ‘white racism’ and etc, then they are gonna grow up thinking that morality is all about Open Hunting Season on White Evil. It’s like once Mao told Red Guards to go look for ‘class enemies’, the youthful nuts were looking for this supposed evil in all corners of society. If they couldn’t find capitalist industrialists, they had to find them somewhere. And soon, they began to hallucinate ‘bourgeois’ evil all over.

    Also, the media/academia have been waging war on objectivity and facts. Even the MSM, led by NYT, said it would have to suspend conventional journalist ethics to stop Trump. You see, the man is ‘literally hitler’, so ANYTHING goes.
    When it’s a struggle between Good and Evil with nothing in between, then anything is justified in aiding the Good against Evil. After all, wasn’t it justifiable for the Allies to go with the BS narrative on Katyn Massacre in order to defeat Nazism.
    Okay, there may be cases where the Evil is so great that we must tolerate necessary evils to defeat the Big Evil.

    PC hysteria sees everything in terms of Good vs Hitler. Even STAR WARS is now about Good vs White Evil. If you oppose ‘gay marriage’, even that is GREAT EVIL.
    PC sees everything in terms of Manichean struggle. Since there is only Good vs Evil, any lies or fantasies that serve the Good is justified since the Evil is so Evil.
    So, this young woman was infected and instilled with this mindset from the Power That Be. After all, journalism schools don’t teach objectivity as a good anymore. It’s all about the Narrative. (This mindset infects the academia as Jonathan Haidt pointed out. So-called Libs don’t merely disagree with Cons but see Cons as evil or at best, retarded. Secular Cons are ‘racist’ and ‘evil’ cuz they believe in biological differences. Therefore, they must be banned. And religious cons are dumb cuz they believe in God. And even when secular cons turn out to be right on racial differences, they must be suppressed because the implications are too terrible.
    Things have got so bad that even Nicholas Kristof has gotten to arguing that the echo-chamber has gotten to incestuous in the academia.

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2016/12/how-radicals-destroyed-liberalism.html

    Also, history has been retold as a simple story of Good vs Evil. ‘Racism’ was totally evil, purely white, and there was nothing good about it. Jews were always totally good and innocent and never to be blamed for anything. ‘Antisemitism’ was never justified whereas Jews were always justified. The Civil Rights movement was about total good vs total bad with no grey areas. It was MLK as saint vs KKK.
    Of course, reality is never this simple, but the Narrative that kids grew up with painted such simple view of history. It’s a comic book view of history.
    It’s also worse cuz of fusion of Leftism and Pop Culture. There was a time when Leftism disdained Pop Culture as capitalist, commercial, simple-minded, and stupid. Sure, the Left always saw the usefulness of Pop Culture, but it didn’t care for its vulgarity and crudeness.
    But as the Left got more Pop, its vision also became cruder and stupider. It turned morality into a Comic Book of superheroes and villains.
    Given that many kids grew up with only Pop Culture and PC, their view of reality is dumber and more simple-minded than leftisms of the past.
    In the 50s and 60s, the Left might make a sober movie about evils of ‘racism’ like BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK or TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD. In order to fight bigots, one should be dignified and sober. Good People had maturity and integrity, while bigots were filled with sadism, brutality, and ugliness.
    But as the Left embraced total vulgarization of culture, their positions got ‘bigoted’ in style. We can see this in Quentin Tarantino’s INGLOROUS BASTERDS and DJANGO UNCHAINED. It’s like the fantasy of Prog rednecks. Vulgar, trashy, and sadistic. It’s not about good guys with dignity fighting brutal bad guys, but good guys acting like KKK thugs and Hollywood Nazis to defeat the bad guys. Nihilism is a big part of SJW culture.

    As insufferable and ridiculous as these SJWs of all color are, the fact that hate hoaxes have exploded so much in recent yrs goes to show that it’s been encouraged and given green light by the Powers That Be. And now, with the Powers That Be screaming about Russia Stole the Election, Russia Stole the Election, and etc, it’s just adding more fuel to the fire. The Power-that-be highlighted SJW hype and hysteria, not least after Trump won, uncritically reporting on SPLC claims of explosion of ‘hate crimes’ against Muslims and non-whites. Indeed, the MSM’s cozy relation with SPLC and ADL, two big generators of hate hype and hate hoax, is part of the problem. So often, MSM will refer to SPLC without any disclaimer that the organization is run by sleazy Zionists who’ve raked tons of money by scare-mongering about non-existent KKK. SPLC is the final word, indeed the word of god. It must be true cuz SPLC said it.

    But then, the Right isn’t innocent either. The so-called Right’s pandering to lying and duplicitous Neocons has been downright shameful. And let’s not forget all the dirty lies told by Bush I and Bush II to get us into war with Iraq. And then lies about Syria. Most of GOP was attacking Obama for not getting MORE INVOLVED against Assad. And GOP fully endorsed the lies about Russia in Ukraine. This culture of lies in the GOP has meant that every politician must repeat or exaggerate Neocon lies to get a piece of the pie. Consider that worthless Tom Cotton.
    This is why Alt Right stands apart. For all its faults(and some craziness), it is the only force out there that is willing to really challenge the Narrative.

    This Muslim whore is a piss-ant, but we must admit that the Central Command of the Culture of Lies in America is dominated by Jews, homos, and blacks. Jewish lies about Russia are downright hysterical. And we must fool ourselves that Palestinians and Iranians pose an ‘existential’ threat to Israel when Israel still occupies West Bank and has 300 nukes(to 0 for Iran). And we had to suffer the total BS of BLM that was endorsed by media, academia, and government. And homos told so many lies. Matthew Shepard was just tip of iceberg. Also, the notion that all those homos died of HIV cuz of Reagan!!!

    And where were Conservatives against such culture of lies? As fellow worshipers of MLK cult and afraid of being called ‘racist’, they were mum about black lies. As whores of Neocons who promised them more Jewish support and money, Conservatives went along with so many Zionist lies that led to so much misery in the Middle East, Russia, and EU. And since Conservatives suck up to Neocons and since Jews love homos, they were sheepish about taking on homo lies. So, ours became a Culture of Lies.

    While all groups have liars and cheats, they are not protected when they pull the alarm or break the law. Calling foul on Chinese espionage in the US, Russian subversion in the US, or Iranian support of terrorism is fair game.
    But we must never notice bad behavior and the lies of Jews, blacks, and homos. And since all three are heavily invested in SJW culture and movements, they’ve been able to push their Narrative far and wide without repercussion.

    We have to get to the source of this cancer. This Muslim girl is an idiot but just a skin cell. The real malignancy is with other powers.

    It’s like Kurosawa said of BAD SLEEP WELL. He said the problem with the film was he didn’t go far enough. He showed some bad guys but not the real big bad guys behind the bad guys.

    Focusing on idiots like this girl is like going after individual cancer cells in the body without addressing the core tumor that keeps on spewing out more cancer cells.

    There is a nexus of media, academia, finance, and government that sustains the anti-white Hate. From its vantage point(with heavy ethnic slant), the hysteria of SJW is necessary chemotherapy to keep the tumor of white supremacist cancer from growing. If left alone, they believe that White Nationalism will grow bigger and bigger and turn Nazi. So, constant pressure must be put on white society, and SJWs are the chemo that, though sometimes attacking innocent whites, is necessary evil to fight the greater evil. It’s like the US justifies its sanctions that kills many innocents in order to contain the rogue regime of other nations.

    But this mania has gotten so out of hand that SJW madness isn’t just attacking far-right tumor but everything deemed ‘normal’. To be sure, such paranoia is understandable in a nation where the minority has gained dominance. Unlike majority power that can be secure and complacent, minority power is always uneasy since it is not natural for the few to control the many. It is not natural for 2% Jews to control gentile society. It is not natural for 2% of homos to control straight society. It is not natural for minority immigrant community to dictate to native society. It is not natural for 13% of blacks to push around majority that isn’t black. So, minority power must always work over-time and over-the-top to beat down the majority. It’s like the Spartan elites were ruthless in their constant attacks on the Helots who outnumbered them. It was to send a message to the Helots that ANY thought of dissent on their part would be crushed totally. So, don’t even think about it. And this is the anti-white, anti-gentile, and anti-straight mindset among the minority elites and coalition.

    Of course, there are whites who take part in this madness. Some are just craven opportunists who will do or say anything. They just collaborate with power.

    But there’s also the problem of Cold Compassion or Ruthless Morality.
    People wonder why Swedes, the descendants of the ruthless Vikings, turned into such sappy do-gooders. But in a way, the cold ruthlessness still remains. The rules have changed, but the heartlessness is the same. The Vikings were single-minded in their cold determination to plunder and loot and pillage. They felt no pity for their victims.
    Today’s Progs in Sweden may seem so different as they profess to Care so much. But their commitment to Compassion is Cold as ice. Even though evidence is piling up that their actions are leading to mayhem, disaster, and chaos all over, their are coldly determined to push through this madness with ruthless precision and iron will.
    Warm Compassion has limits. While people with warmth might feel sympathy for people around the world, they would also admit to the limits of what Sweden could do, and they would also feel warmth for their fellow Swedes and not try to hurt them. But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do. It’s like Hitler’s ruthless decision to fight to the end and destroy all of Germany in the bargain. And this cold compassion was also with communists who could kill millions with the cold confidence that anything was justified to serve the cause.
    When a German prog says German cities will be majority non-German and that is a ‘good thing’, it’s not about sappy compassion. It is a kind of coldness, a steely commitment to ideology of destruction as redemption. It is pathological, no less than Nazism. It is blind to destruction of people and culture since it is so sure of its rigor and rightness.

    And we have such whites in the Prog movement in the US too. While some are craven and some are just sappy, some are ruthless in their cold compassion that is frozen in their dogma of what is correct and necessary. Keith Olbermann’s nuttery is a good example. He is not just some sappy do-goody Lib. He is utterly determined and ruthless in his idea of righteousness, so much in fact that he is coldly blind and unfeeling to all the havoc it may cause.

    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "But we must never notice bad behavior and the lies of Jews, blacks, and homos."

    You don't like to notice the bad behavior and lies of Muslims. This blog is about a Muslim woman committing a hate hoax and you immediately deflect to Jews, Blacks, and Homos, completely ignoring this Muslim woman smearing White Christian men.

    "We have to get to the source of this cancer. This Muslim girl is an idiot but just a skin cell. The real malignancy is with other powers."

    Would you still say this hate hoaxer is just a skin cell if she was a Jew?
    , @Dumbo

    "But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do."

     

    Well said. Having spent some time in Germany for work I find that are not very gregarious or open to foreigners, yet they proceeded with that bizarre welcoming of almost a million "refugees", many of whom are not even who they say they are.

    And most Germans continue doing it with it even though the problems are very clear now for all to see, and they may even vote to keep Angela Merkel in power. When I was in Germany, a year ago, "Refugees welcome" signs where everywhere.

    In part I guess is that they were tired of being perceived as "Nazis" or "cold people" by the rest of the world and decided to make one big gesture to appear more welcoming.

    It didn't work, of course. They are still called "Nazis" if they protest against immigration, they did not become magically more friendly, and even even some of the "refugees" now resent them because they did not find the "paradise" they were promised. Instead of integrating, the Muslims live in a society apart, parallel with German society but rarely with one touching the other.

    I don't know about Scandinavians, but I don't think Germans have a lot of "sappy compassion" for others. It is really more a pathological form of virtue signaling or a bizarre attempt to self-destruct themselves in the eyes of the world for perceived sins.
  22. How can you be “verbally assaulted”?

  23. @Steve Sailer
    Not a lot of concern for ethnic diversity at Goldberg's Atlantic.

    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn’t need them anymore (he’s independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There’s just no market for print media nowadays.

    • Agree: Jack ryan
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Didn't I hear NYT and WaPo subscriptions went up post-election?

    https://twitter.com/JohnRiversX4/status/809163977733406721

    Liberals need their Kleenex right now. Outrage mags for stiff-upper-lipped virtue-signalling grown-ups, puppies and coloring books for the college-aged children.

    Someone needs to remind them of their daily experience for the next four years: "This. Is. Not. Normal."

    , @Lot
    The Atlantic makes its money having expensive conferences at resorts where you can mingle with celebrity intellectuals.
    , @Almost Missouri
    It is hard to tell exactly, since it is privately owned, but my impression is that since at least the 1990s The Atlantic had been losing money. It survived being passed among various vanity owners on the cachet of having been founded by a bunch of famous literary WASPs.

    Recently, it reinvented itself as clickbait for SWPLs, which made me stop subscribing, but perhaps characteristically, this strategy seems to be working (financially if not in promoting of truth). The Atlantic now claims to be mildly profitable.

    One casualty of The Atlantic's newfound "success": the 1857 mission statement,


    The Atlantic will be the organ of no party or clique.”
     
    Oh well.
    , @Jack ryan
    The hard copy The Atlantic magazine was excellent in the early 1990s. It wrote honest articles on crime, immigration, Islam, culture from a secular honest liberal perspective.

    This is my own perspective - intelligent, honest, secular liberal perspective.

    But today's The Atlantic is increasingly just a blog that churns out predictable PC left Tweets.

    Some exceptions were:

    "What ISIS really wants"

    That was the best article of the year from Left to Right.
  24. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer
    Not a lot of concern for ethnic diversity at Goldberg's Atlantic.

    Now that’s where you’re wrong.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/press-releases/

    Franklin Foer to Write for The Atlantic Magazine
    Dec 11, 2016

    The Atlantic Hires Julia Ioffe to Cover Politics and Foreign Policy
    Recent hires include McKay Coppins on politics, Culture Editor Jane Yong Kim, and Sarah Zhang on science, tech, and health
    Dec 6, 2016

    “Inclusion in Silicon Valley: An Atlantic Workshop,” in Mountain View, CA on December 14th
    The Atlantic’s first daylong summit focused on gender, racial & economic disparities in Silicon Valley
    Dec 5, 2016

  25. @SPMoore8
    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn't need them anymore (he's independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There's just no market for print media nowadays.

    Didn’t I hear NYT and WaPo subscriptions went up post-election?

    https://twitter.com/JohnRiversX4/status/809163977733406721

    Liberals need their Kleenex right now. Outrage mags for stiff-upper-lipped virtue-signalling grown-ups, puppies and coloring books for the college-aged children.

    Someone needs to remind them of their daily experience for the next four years: “This. Is. Not. Normal.”

    • Replies: @SPMoore8
    I find it hard to believe that circulation went up for WaPo and NYT, but if it did, it appears it was reflexive. Moreover, those are dailies, and I can see some limited utility for those (but not for $1.75 which is what a shrunk down copy of the Times goes for at the newstand.)

    PS: You realize you can get beyond the paywalls just by right-clicking the article you want and view page source; they haven't found a way to mystify ordinary text -- yet.

    I also found it extremely hard to believe that Julia Ioffe would make a crack about Trump's daughter and incest. Not only is that not funny, it's depraved. And here I thought she was cute and salvageable in a Sonia Marmeladova kind of way ......

    Meanwhile, weeklies and monthlies are toast. I still get my mother's legacy subscription to the New Yorker (since I've been paying for it for decades.) However she cannot read anymore so I just keep it around for the covers. However, that's like $50 a year, the street price is $7.95. You've got to be kidding.
  26. What she said about Trump and his daughter. Sick mind! But not the first of her kind to go there. Deplorable insight. Give ’em enough rope.(overdue for a Clash nod)

    • Replies: @Tacitus2016
    Short-Fingered Vulgarians.(language warning)

    https://mobile.twitter.com/ashleyfeinberg/status/809167062367141888

  27. “Three white men who were apparently intoxicated repeatedly yelled anti-Islam insults at a Muslim student in the New York City subway and no one did anything. The men, who yelled “Donald Trump!” several times and even tried to pull off the terrified 18-year-old’s hijab, also accused her of being a terrorist. This all took place at around 10 p.m. on Thursday night on the 6 train as Yasmin Seweid was returning home from Baruch College.”

    This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable.

    • Replies: @Cwhatfuture
    What are the chances that three white male Trump supporters even exist in Manhattan?

    Not to mention, no one had a cell phone recording of the event.
    , @Jefferson
    "This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable."

    Most people who take the NYC subway are Asian, African American and Hispanic. I have an extremely hard time believing that The Coalition Of The Fringes would just stand by, watch, and do nothing as 3 White men bully a Muslim woman. The 3 White men would not have gotten out of the train alive or if they did they would leave in a stretcher. All of The Coalition Of The Fringes would be united in giving these 3 White men an ass whooping.
  28. @Days of Broken Arrows
    Why is she in a hijab yet wearing full American-style makeup? I thought the whole purpose of hijabs was to downplay women's sexuality. Doesn't makeup sort of undo that? This, in my opinion, is the worst of both worlds: Old-style religion mixed with modern hypocrisy.

    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all so, this is technically not a real hijab. This is another type of garment altogether, that is known in Arabic as an ” effu “. It’s purpose is to allow a girl to still display her femininity, and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.

    • Replies: @frayedthread

    in Arabic as an ” effu “.
     
    aka an "F.U" to kaffir.
    oldie but goodie from the Onion
    http://www.theonion.com/article/woman-in-burqa-condemns-woman-in-chador-169
    , @Lurker

    and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.
     
    And that is good. It helps separate us from them.
    , @a reader
    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all

    As she is dating a Catholic, it has been taken care of by her father and/or brother.

  29. I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I love the usual tactic from those who've used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I've read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that's been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they've retconned them into isolated events.

    Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes.

    And what's more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there's a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    , @Charles Erwin Wilson

    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer...
     
    Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?
    , @Jefferson
    "I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars."

    If they are not hoaxes committed by Nonwhite liars than why haven't any Trump supporters been arrested yet in all of these supposed "hate crimes" committed by Trump supporters against Muslims, Hispanics, African Americans, etc after the presidential election was over? Shouldn't our country's jails and prisons be flooded with Trump supporters right now if these were real hate crimes?

  30. @Tiny Duck
    We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.

    We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.

    …perpetrated by other People of Color, Tiny Dick… not whites.

  31. @MC
    What are you talking about? They have Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Mizrahim...

    There are also male and female, maybe some genderfluid.

    Model T diversity. You can have any writer you like, as long as…

  32. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars.

    I love the usual tactic from those who’ve used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that’s been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they’ve retconned them into isolated events.

    Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes.

    And what’s more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there’s a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    By the way, Corvinus, something tells me you're moments away from the boilerplate liberal reply that they've had so many opportunities to rehearse: "Hate hoaxers victimize real hate crime victims." Do they not victimize the alleged attackers?

    It's the millionth variation of "Suspicions about Muslims make Muslims the real victims of Muslim slaughter and rape" that follows every terrorist attack and every Rotherham.

    , @Corvinus
    "I love the usual tactic from those who’ve used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that’s been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they’ve retconned them into isolated events."

    What are those twelve hoaxes? How many actual "hate crime"--a term that to me personally is dubious, along with its legal implications--have occurred compared to those that turned out to be hoaxes in real numbers?

    "Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes."

    I do not believe the false reporting meets the legal criteria for a "hate crime", but certainly the person who made that false report ought to be proscecuted under the fullest extent of the law.

    "And what’s more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there’s a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released
  33. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I think this is most unfair.

    Don’t you understand that she is trans-real?

    Look, if Bruce Jenner imagines himself a ‘woman’, he is a ‘woman’!!

    If this girl imagined or hallucinated three white men attacking her, it happened. It doesn’t have to be real to be real. It’s trans-real. Reality is fluid.

    • Replies: @TheJester
    Well put ....

    It might be useful to distinguish between illusions and delusions. An illusion is a counterfactual condition you project on others ... a woman's makeup to project a more youthful appearance is an example. It becomes a delusion when the woman looks in the mirror and believes that it's really her.

    My take is that the Muslim girl in the fake attack was illusional ... she was knowingly projecting ideological "makeup" on the public to get attention and score Pokemon points against White males. Bruce Jenner and the rest of the "trans" community are delusional.

  34. Someone should create a Hall of Hoax.

    If not a real museum, an online museum.

    It will be Rock n Roll Museum. Crock and Bull Museum.

  35. ” Because non-whites are generally liars.”

    Whiny too.

    • Replies: @David
    How come you can post under that name from anywhere but I can only do it form my desk?
  36. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    I love the usual tactic from those who've used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I've read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that's been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they've retconned them into isolated events.

    Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes.

    And what's more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there's a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    By the way, Corvinus, something tells me you’re moments away from the boilerplate liberal reply that they’ve had so many opportunities to rehearse: “Hate hoaxers victimize real hate crime victims.” Do they not victimize the alleged attackers?

    It’s the millionth variation of “Suspicions about Muslims make Muslims the real victims of Muslim slaughter and rape” that follows every terrorist attack and every Rotherham.

  37. @Alfa158
    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all so, this is technically not a real hijab. This is another type of garment altogether, that is known in Arabic as an " effu ". It's purpose is to allow a girl to still display her femininity, and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.

    in Arabic as an ” effu “.

    aka an “F.U” to kaffir.
    oldie but goodie from the Onion
    http://www.theonion.com/article/woman-in-burqa-condemns-woman-in-chador-169

  38. @Corvinus
    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars.

    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer…

    Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?"

    My political philosophy takes into account my own confirmation biases and prejudices and looks at both sides as objectively as humanely possible. I am what some people call a "cuck", but that characterization would describe a wide swath of conservatives and liberals who also try their best to critically analyze sources. Are you here for comic relief or are you here to learn more about your own positions?

    The point is that "hate crimes" occur, that whites -and- nonwhites engage in criminal activity against people, in some cases solely because of their racial or sexual background. In some cases, there are situations where the "victim" makes up the crime--they should be prosecuted. In those instances where "hate crimes" are legitimate, they also should be brought up on charges already on the books. These examples are NOT made up crimes, as some here would argue. Again, I find "hate crime" enhancements passed by legislators and used by prosecutors to be unnecessary.
  39. @Perspective
    "Three white men who were apparently intoxicated repeatedly yelled anti-Islam insults at a Muslim student in the New York City subway and no one did anything. The men, who yelled “Donald Trump!” several times and even tried to pull off the terrified 18-year-old’s hijab, also accused her of being a terrorist. This all took place at around 10 p.m. on Thursday night on the 6 train as Yasmin Seweid was returning home from Baruch College."

    This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable.

    What are the chances that three white male Trump supporters even exist in Manhattan?

    Not to mention, no one had a cell phone recording of the event.

  40. @Anonymous
    Didn't I hear NYT and WaPo subscriptions went up post-election?

    https://twitter.com/JohnRiversX4/status/809163977733406721

    Liberals need their Kleenex right now. Outrage mags for stiff-upper-lipped virtue-signalling grown-ups, puppies and coloring books for the college-aged children.

    Someone needs to remind them of their daily experience for the next four years: "This. Is. Not. Normal."

    I find it hard to believe that circulation went up for WaPo and NYT, but if it did, it appears it was reflexive. Moreover, those are dailies, and I can see some limited utility for those (but not for $1.75 which is what a shrunk down copy of the Times goes for at the newstand.)

    PS: You realize you can get beyond the paywalls just by right-clicking the article you want and view page source; they haven’t found a way to mystify ordinary text — yet.

    I also found it extremely hard to believe that Julia Ioffe would make a crack about Trump’s daughter and incest. Not only is that not funny, it’s depraved. And here I thought she was cute and salvageable in a Sonia Marmeladova kind of way ……

    Meanwhile, weeklies and monthlies are toast. I still get my mother’s legacy subscription to the New Yorker (since I’ve been paying for it for decades.) However she cannot read anymore so I just keep it around for the covers. However, that’s like $50 a year, the street price is $7.95. You’ve got to be kidding.

  41. Three white men — check, of course.

    (Slate is compiling a running list)

    As of right now, this “horrifying incident” is still on the the list, which you can find here — interested readers can check back later to see if it gets removed.

    “We dedicated a lot of resources to this…” — no doubt.

    One thing I don’t understand about this post: where exactly does the ‘oops’ part come in again?

  42. It could have happened.

    – Hon. James Ware

  43. Steve,

    It might be useful to have a hashtag that picks up anti-White, anti-Gentilic, or anti-Trump hoaxes.

    “Hate hoaxes”?

    “anti-White hoaxes”?

    “anti-White hate hoaxes”?

  44. was this one counted by the SPLC?

  45. @Tiny Duck
    We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.

    I see that the list of hate crime hoaxes has got this one already:

    http://infogalactic.com/info/Hate_crime_hoaxes

    If you look at the discussion page they were just waiting for this one to be confirmed.

  46. A previous thread in this blog discussed the burlary and vandalism of football player Nikita Whitlock’s home. Commenter “unpc downunder” suggested that the incident was a hoax but that Whitlock was innocent.

    I get the feeling burglary complaint is genuine, but the burglar is another black man who has painted the KKK stuff to lay a false trail. Even if Whitlock isn’t a criminal himself, it’s highly he has a black friend or relative who is, and the graffiti would encourage Whitlock to think it was the work of a stranger.

    I now think that this explanation is quite likely, but the culprit is a White person who lived in Whitlock’s home.

    The home was occupied by Whitlock, his wife, his two children, his sister and a downstairs roommate. Whitlock’s wife is Black.

    The downstairs roommate probably is White, because the graffiti in the roommate’s bedroom said N*GG*R LOVER. (Whitlock mentioned this detail in his interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes.) That would make the downstairs roommate the only White person living in the home.

    The downstairs roommate is a likely suspect because he (might be a she) had the opportunity and means to commit the crime. The motive for the roommate to commit the crime might have been Whitlock’s jewelry.

    The racist graffiti — especially the N*GG*R LOVER written on the roommate’s bedroom wall — was supposed to deflect any suspicion from the roommate.

    —–

    The Whitlock family decided right before Thanksgiving to move out of the Moonachie home and, it seems, said so to the landlord. If the roommate wanted to steal Whitlock’s jewelry, then he would have to do so before the imminent move.

    During the Thanksgiving holiday, someone attempted to break through a “window to one of the doors”. Whitlock told MSNBC’s Hayes that a metal design in the window glass prevented this effort. Whitlock then said this strange remark: “they took some packages but were not able to get in”.

    This remark would make sense if the roommate first stole some packages from inside the home and then tried to break through a window to stage a burglary. Then, after he was not able to break through the window, he for some reason failed to return the packages to their proper place inside the home. Perhaps he had opened the packages in an unsuccessful search for the jewelry.

    —–

    The roommate would have known that the Whitlock family — including Nikita’s sister — would be gone for a couple of hours on the evening of December 6. This time the roommate did find the jewelry.

  47. Baruch College used to be quite distinguished. Not so much nowadays…

  48. @Yak-15
    I propose that she moves to Saudi Arabia where she will never be at risk for such behavior.

    Seconded.

  49. @Alfa158
    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all so, this is technically not a real hijab. This is another type of garment altogether, that is known in Arabic as an " effu ". It's purpose is to allow a girl to still display her femininity, and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.

    and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.

    And that is good. It helps separate us from them.

  50. @SPMoore8
    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn't need them anymore (he's independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There's just no market for print media nowadays.

    The Atlantic makes its money having expensive conferences at resorts where you can mingle with celebrity intellectuals.

  51. Well, smash my buret and call me a biologist…

    …but I think she did this as the aggrievement-asserting PC-mating-call of the heavily-made-up-selfie subspecies of the teenage Muslim female.

    What better way to meet upscale mates in NYC?

    I mean, she is a Baruch student. Maybe she perceives the MRS degrees there passing her by.

    • Replies: @dilys
    Q. What tactic evolutionarily drives marriageable females?
    A. Being visible in the market to high-quality males.
    Extra bonus points: tell a story that elicits their principled protectiveness.
    Connects easily to UVA faux accusation.
  52. @Anon
    People who tell lies like these are both victims and perpetrators.

    I wouldn't waste my sympathy on them, but they are brainwashed tools of PC.

    It's like Hitler Youth and Red Guards. Yes, they did terrible things. They were monsters, but they were also dupes and puppets.

    It used to be that pulling a fire alarm was a prank. Not funny but a prank.

    But these new alarm-pullers are not pranksters. They are real cranksters, but then, who made them that way? Why are so many acting like this? This isn't an isolated incident. They are all over. All over colleges, all over high schools, all over neighborhoods. And they've been enabled and encouraged by the powers-that-be in colleges who either turned a blind eye or exploited the crisis to push an agenda. Even after the KKK hoax was exposed at Oberlin, it was used as a teachable moment. At Mizzou, people got fired while the scumbags were put on a pedestal. This Victim Complex has been promoted by the Powers that be. There is a pattern here, and it's part of a political mentality, just like the mindset of the Cultural Revolution.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjmz9K59a7E

    So, it misses the point to focus on this girl. Yes, she deserves to be punished. But blaming her is like blaming a Red Guard without pointing the finger at Mao who gave green light to the madness and orchestrated it through national media and networks. It's like denouncing the Hitler Youth who attacked a Jewish business without mentioning the Nazi Powers That Be encouraged such mindset and behavior.

    Now, unlike Nazi Germany or Maoist China, there is no single all-powerful figure who gave the go-ahead to SJW nuttery. But the nexus of the Powers-that-be from media to academia to government have been encouraging and enabling this kind of crazed SJW mindset in young people and from a young age.



    When young children are drummed day in and day out about 'white privilege' and 'white racism' and etc, then they are gonna grow up thinking that morality is all about Open Hunting Season on White Evil. It's like once Mao told Red Guards to go look for 'class enemies', the youthful nuts were looking for this supposed evil in all corners of society. If they couldn't find capitalist industrialists, they had to find them somewhere. And soon, they began to hallucinate 'bourgeois' evil all over.

    Also, the media/academia have been waging war on objectivity and facts. Even the MSM, led by NYT, said it would have to suspend conventional journalist ethics to stop Trump. You see, the man is 'literally hitler', so ANYTHING goes.
    When it's a struggle between Good and Evil with nothing in between, then anything is justified in aiding the Good against Evil. After all, wasn't it justifiable for the Allies to go with the BS narrative on Katyn Massacre in order to defeat Nazism.
    Okay, there may be cases where the Evil is so great that we must tolerate necessary evils to defeat the Big Evil.

    PC hysteria sees everything in terms of Good vs Hitler. Even STAR WARS is now about Good vs White Evil. If you oppose 'gay marriage', even that is GREAT EVIL.
    PC sees everything in terms of Manichean struggle. Since there is only Good vs Evil, any lies or fantasies that serve the Good is justified since the Evil is so Evil.
    So, this young woman was infected and instilled with this mindset from the Power That Be. After all, journalism schools don't teach objectivity as a good anymore. It's all about the Narrative. (This mindset infects the academia as Jonathan Haidt pointed out. So-called Libs don't merely disagree with Cons but see Cons as evil or at best, retarded. Secular Cons are 'racist' and 'evil' cuz they believe in biological differences. Therefore, they must be banned. And religious cons are dumb cuz they believe in God. And even when secular cons turn out to be right on racial differences, they must be suppressed because the implications are too terrible.
    Things have got so bad that even Nicholas Kristof has gotten to arguing that the echo-chamber has gotten to incestuous in the academia.

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2016/12/how-radicals-destroyed-liberalism.html

    Also, history has been retold as a simple story of Good vs Evil. 'Racism' was totally evil, purely white, and there was nothing good about it. Jews were always totally good and innocent and never to be blamed for anything. 'Antisemitism' was never justified whereas Jews were always justified. The Civil Rights movement was about total good vs total bad with no grey areas. It was MLK as saint vs KKK.
    Of course, reality is never this simple, but the Narrative that kids grew up with painted such simple view of history. It's a comic book view of history.
    It's also worse cuz of fusion of Leftism and Pop Culture. There was a time when Leftism disdained Pop Culture as capitalist, commercial, simple-minded, and stupid. Sure, the Left always saw the usefulness of Pop Culture, but it didn't care for its vulgarity and crudeness.
    But as the Left got more Pop, its vision also became cruder and stupider. It turned morality into a Comic Book of superheroes and villains.
    Given that many kids grew up with only Pop Culture and PC, their view of reality is dumber and more simple-minded than leftisms of the past.
    In the 50s and 60s, the Left might make a sober movie about evils of 'racism' like BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK or TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD. In order to fight bigots, one should be dignified and sober. Good People had maturity and integrity, while bigots were filled with sadism, brutality, and ugliness.
    But as the Left embraced total vulgarization of culture, their positions got 'bigoted' in style. We can see this in Quentin Tarantino's INGLOROUS BASTERDS and DJANGO UNCHAINED. It's like the fantasy of Prog rednecks. Vulgar, trashy, and sadistic. It's not about good guys with dignity fighting brutal bad guys, but good guys acting like KKK thugs and Hollywood Nazis to defeat the bad guys. Nihilism is a big part of SJW culture.

    As insufferable and ridiculous as these SJWs of all color are, the fact that hate hoaxes have exploded so much in recent yrs goes to show that it's been encouraged and given green light by the Powers That Be. And now, with the Powers That Be screaming about Russia Stole the Election, Russia Stole the Election, and etc, it's just adding more fuel to the fire. The Power-that-be highlighted SJW hype and hysteria, not least after Trump won, uncritically reporting on SPLC claims of explosion of 'hate crimes' against Muslims and non-whites. Indeed, the MSM's cozy relation with SPLC and ADL, two big generators of hate hype and hate hoax, is part of the problem. So often, MSM will refer to SPLC without any disclaimer that the organization is run by sleazy Zionists who've raked tons of money by scare-mongering about non-existent KKK. SPLC is the final word, indeed the word of god. It must be true cuz SPLC said it.

    But then, the Right isn't innocent either. The so-called Right's pandering to lying and duplicitous Neocons has been downright shameful. And let's not forget all the dirty lies told by Bush I and Bush II to get us into war with Iraq. And then lies about Syria. Most of GOP was attacking Obama for not getting MORE INVOLVED against Assad. And GOP fully endorsed the lies about Russia in Ukraine. This culture of lies in the GOP has meant that every politician must repeat or exaggerate Neocon lies to get a piece of the pie. Consider that worthless Tom Cotton.
    This is why Alt Right stands apart. For all its faults(and some craziness), it is the only force out there that is willing to really challenge the Narrative.

    This Muslim whore is a piss-ant, but we must admit that the Central Command of the Culture of Lies in America is dominated by Jews, homos, and blacks. Jewish lies about Russia are downright hysterical. And we must fool ourselves that Palestinians and Iranians pose an 'existential' threat to Israel when Israel still occupies West Bank and has 300 nukes(to 0 for Iran). And we had to suffer the total BS of BLM that was endorsed by media, academia, and government. And homos told so many lies. Matthew Shepard was just tip of iceberg. Also, the notion that all those homos died of HIV cuz of Reagan!!!

    And where were Conservatives against such culture of lies? As fellow worshipers of MLK cult and afraid of being called 'racist', they were mum about black lies. As whores of Neocons who promised them more Jewish support and money, Conservatives went along with so many Zionist lies that led to so much misery in the Middle East, Russia, and EU. And since Conservatives suck up to Neocons and since Jews love homos, they were sheepish about taking on homo lies. So, ours became a Culture of Lies.

    While all groups have liars and cheats, they are not protected when they pull the alarm or break the law. Calling foul on Chinese espionage in the US, Russian subversion in the US, or Iranian support of terrorism is fair game.
    But we must never notice bad behavior and the lies of Jews, blacks, and homos. And since all three are heavily invested in SJW culture and movements, they've been able to push their Narrative far and wide without repercussion.

    We have to get to the source of this cancer. This Muslim girl is an idiot but just a skin cell. The real malignancy is with other powers.

    It's like Kurosawa said of BAD SLEEP WELL. He said the problem with the film was he didn't go far enough. He showed some bad guys but not the real big bad guys behind the bad guys.

    Focusing on idiots like this girl is like going after individual cancer cells in the body without addressing the core tumor that keeps on spewing out more cancer cells.

    There is a nexus of media, academia, finance, and government that sustains the anti-white Hate. From its vantage point(with heavy ethnic slant), the hysteria of SJW is necessary chemotherapy to keep the tumor of white supremacist cancer from growing. If left alone, they believe that White Nationalism will grow bigger and bigger and turn Nazi. So, constant pressure must be put on white society, and SJWs are the chemo that, though sometimes attacking innocent whites, is necessary evil to fight the greater evil. It's like the US justifies its sanctions that kills many innocents in order to contain the rogue regime of other nations.

    But this mania has gotten so out of hand that SJW madness isn't just attacking far-right tumor but everything deemed 'normal'. To be sure, such paranoia is understandable in a nation where the minority has gained dominance. Unlike majority power that can be secure and complacent, minority power is always uneasy since it is not natural for the few to control the many. It is not natural for 2% Jews to control gentile society. It is not natural for 2% of homos to control straight society. It is not natural for minority immigrant community to dictate to native society. It is not natural for 13% of blacks to push around majority that isn't black. So, minority power must always work over-time and over-the-top to beat down the majority. It's like the Spartan elites were ruthless in their constant attacks on the Helots who outnumbered them. It was to send a message to the Helots that ANY thought of dissent on their part would be crushed totally. So, don't even think about it. And this is the anti-white, anti-gentile, and anti-straight mindset among the minority elites and coalition.

    Of course, there are whites who take part in this madness. Some are just craven opportunists who will do or say anything. They just collaborate with power.

    But there's also the problem of Cold Compassion or Ruthless Morality.
    People wonder why Swedes, the descendants of the ruthless Vikings, turned into such sappy do-gooders. But in a way, the cold ruthlessness still remains. The rules have changed, but the heartlessness is the same. The Vikings were single-minded in their cold determination to plunder and loot and pillage. They felt no pity for their victims.
    Today's Progs in Sweden may seem so different as they profess to Care so much. But their commitment to Compassion is Cold as ice. Even though evidence is piling up that their actions are leading to mayhem, disaster, and chaos all over, their are coldly determined to push through this madness with ruthless precision and iron will.
    Warm Compassion has limits. While people with warmth might feel sympathy for people around the world, they would also admit to the limits of what Sweden could do, and they would also feel warmth for their fellow Swedes and not try to hurt them. But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do. It's like Hitler's ruthless decision to fight to the end and destroy all of Germany in the bargain. And this cold compassion was also with communists who could kill millions with the cold confidence that anything was justified to serve the cause.
    When a German prog says German cities will be majority non-German and that is a 'good thing', it's not about sappy compassion. It is a kind of coldness, a steely commitment to ideology of destruction as redemption. It is pathological, no less than Nazism. It is blind to destruction of people and culture since it is so sure of its rigor and rightness.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4F-bv9zTpo

    And we have such whites in the Prog movement in the US too. While some are craven and some are just sappy, some are ruthless in their cold compassion that is frozen in their dogma of what is correct and necessary. Keith Olbermann's nuttery is a good example. He is not just some sappy do-goody Lib. He is utterly determined and ruthless in his idea of righteousness, so much in fact that he is coldly blind and unfeeling to all the havoc it may cause.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XshMnvx6lw

    “But we must never notice bad behavior and the lies of Jews, blacks, and homos.”

    You don’t like to notice the bad behavior and lies of Muslims. This blog is about a Muslim woman committing a hate hoax and you immediately deflect to Jews, Blacks, and Homos, completely ignoring this Muslim woman smearing White Christian men.

    “We have to get to the source of this cancer. This Muslim girl is an idiot but just a skin cell. The real malignancy is with other powers.”

    Would you still say this hate hoaxer is just a skin cell if she was a Jew?

  53. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Looks like the story has been updated:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/muslim-woman-reported-trump-supporter-attack-made-story-article-1.2910944

    Muslim college student made up Trump supporter subway attack story to avoid punishment for missing curfew

    Police sources say Seweid made up the story because she didn’t want to get in trouble for breaking her curfew after being out late drinking with friends.

    Her strict, Muslim parents allegedly forced Seweid to shave her head over the incident and were upset that she was dating a Christian, sources said.

    • Replies: @a reader
    from your link:

    In a bizarre twist, Seweid’s older brother, Abdoul, was also charged with falsely reporting an incident back in 2012.

    Albert Cahn, an attorney for the New York Chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the twist in Seweid’s case shouldn’t take away from the legitimate claims of bias and harassment against Muslims.
  54. @Corvinus
    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars.

    “I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars.”

    If they are not hoaxes committed by Nonwhite liars than why haven’t any Trump supporters been arrested yet in all of these supposed “hate crimes” committed by Trump supporters against Muslims, Hispanics, African Americans, etc after the presidential election was over? Shouldn’t our country’s jails and prisons be flooded with Trump supporters right now if these were real hate crimes?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "If they are not hoaxes committed by Nonwhite liars than why haven’t any Trump supporters been arrested yet in all of these supposed “hate crimes” committed by Trump supporters against Muslims, Hispanics, African Americans, etc after the presidential election was over?"

    Prosecutors have to look at the legal criteria in those cases and judge for themselves, at their discretion, if the standards are met. If it is absolutely determined that a crime was motivated by racial prejudice, then nonwhites for their brutal actions against whites ought to be charged with "hate crimes". It's called context, something who clearly lack in understanding.

    Again, "hate crime" legislation and prosecution is something I do not support.

    "Shouldn’t our country’s jails and prisons be flooded with Trump supporters right now if these were real hate crimes?"

    You mean when white people here who call out their fellow whites as being "bad whites" for not backing up the white race at all times? Is that not a "hate crime"?
  55. @Perspective
    "Three white men who were apparently intoxicated repeatedly yelled anti-Islam insults at a Muslim student in the New York City subway and no one did anything. The men, who yelled “Donald Trump!” several times and even tried to pull off the terrified 18-year-old’s hijab, also accused her of being a terrorist. This all took place at around 10 p.m. on Thursday night on the 6 train as Yasmin Seweid was returning home from Baruch College."

    This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable.

    “This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable.”

    Most people who take the NYC subway are Asian, African American and Hispanic. I have an extremely hard time believing that The Coalition Of The Fringes would just stand by, watch, and do nothing as 3 White men bully a Muslim woman. The 3 White men would not have gotten out of the train alive or if they did they would leave in a stretcher. All of The Coalition Of The Fringes would be united in giving these 3 White men an ass whooping.

    • Replies: @hhsiii
    It's not that. It just doesn't happen like that. And there are whites on the subway. Probably anyone would have helped her if that actually had happened.

    Sentator Kirsten Gillibrand mad a big deal about people supposedly not helping this girl. And Cuomo has his hate crime ask force now. It's all a bunch of BS.

    BTW, she made it up because she was out drinking with friends and didn't want her strict Egyptian Muslim family to find out. They live out on Long Island. her brother was caught stealing electronics out of cars and also made up some story about 3 people harassing him and his friends.

    She's been in trouble at home for becoming to westernized and her dad was mad about a catholic boyfriend.
  56. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Too easy to see deranged narcissism at first sight in that “girl”.

    She should average 100 likes per picture on Facebook, but that is, of course, incomparable with the thrills of being the protagonist of a “hate fact”.
    Thrills for the media, thrills for the “victim”.

    There you go: if it benefits some, and harms nobody (nobody is going to complain, for sure), why not?

  57. @Harry Baldwin
    All my left-wing friends were sharing this story on Facebook when it was going around. I'm quite sure that if they hear it was a hoax that that will make no impression on them. They'll be just as likely to share the next such story. For them, wallowing in horror and pity about fake backlash against Muslims helps them suppress negative thoughts aroused by actual Muslim terrorism.

    Yeah, I knew this story was fake as soon as I heard it. I have been riding that subway line for 40+ years daily. But why bother getting into it on Facebook? It’s amazing how unhinged many of my friends have become. I’m embarrassed for them.

  58. @Anon
    I think this is most unfair.

    Don't you understand that she is trans-real?

    Look, if Bruce Jenner imagines himself a 'woman', he is a 'woman'!!

    If this girl imagined or hallucinated three white men attacking her, it happened. It doesn't have to be real to be real. It's trans-real. Reality is fluid.

    Well put ….

    It might be useful to distinguish between illusions and delusions. An illusion is a counterfactual condition you project on others … a woman’s makeup to project a more youthful appearance is an example. It becomes a delusion when the woman looks in the mirror and believes that it’s really her.

    My take is that the Muslim girl in the fake attack was illusional … she was knowingly projecting ideological “makeup” on the public to get attention and score Pokemon points against White males. Bruce Jenner and the rest of the “trans” community are delusional.

  59. @Alfa158
    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all so, this is technically not a real hijab. This is another type of garment altogether, that is known in Arabic as an " effu ". It's purpose is to allow a girl to still display her femininity, and distinguish her from us kafir, while delivering a pointed message to us.

    She also is not supposed to be showing any hair at all

    As she is dating a Catholic, it has been taken care of by her father and/or brother.

  60. @Tacitus2016
    What she said about Trump and his daughter. Sick mind! But not the first of her kind to go there. Deplorable insight. Give 'em enough rope.(overdue for a Clash nod)

    Short-Fingered Vulgarians.(language warning)

    https://mobile.twitter.com/ashleyfeinberg/status/809167062367141888

  61. If a couple of Christian fanatics had murdered a Muslim, Obama and Hillary would have been tried to make public confessions of Christian faith a “hate crimes.”
    See:
    http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2016/10/islamophobia-versus-christianophobia.html

  62. @Anon
    People who tell lies like these are both victims and perpetrators.

    I wouldn't waste my sympathy on them, but they are brainwashed tools of PC.

    It's like Hitler Youth and Red Guards. Yes, they did terrible things. They were monsters, but they were also dupes and puppets.

    It used to be that pulling a fire alarm was a prank. Not funny but a prank.

    But these new alarm-pullers are not pranksters. They are real cranksters, but then, who made them that way? Why are so many acting like this? This isn't an isolated incident. They are all over. All over colleges, all over high schools, all over neighborhoods. And they've been enabled and encouraged by the powers-that-be in colleges who either turned a blind eye or exploited the crisis to push an agenda. Even after the KKK hoax was exposed at Oberlin, it was used as a teachable moment. At Mizzou, people got fired while the scumbags were put on a pedestal. This Victim Complex has been promoted by the Powers that be. There is a pattern here, and it's part of a political mentality, just like the mindset of the Cultural Revolution.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjmz9K59a7E

    So, it misses the point to focus on this girl. Yes, she deserves to be punished. But blaming her is like blaming a Red Guard without pointing the finger at Mao who gave green light to the madness and orchestrated it through national media and networks. It's like denouncing the Hitler Youth who attacked a Jewish business without mentioning the Nazi Powers That Be encouraged such mindset and behavior.

    Now, unlike Nazi Germany or Maoist China, there is no single all-powerful figure who gave the go-ahead to SJW nuttery. But the nexus of the Powers-that-be from media to academia to government have been encouraging and enabling this kind of crazed SJW mindset in young people and from a young age.



    When young children are drummed day in and day out about 'white privilege' and 'white racism' and etc, then they are gonna grow up thinking that morality is all about Open Hunting Season on White Evil. It's like once Mao told Red Guards to go look for 'class enemies', the youthful nuts were looking for this supposed evil in all corners of society. If they couldn't find capitalist industrialists, they had to find them somewhere. And soon, they began to hallucinate 'bourgeois' evil all over.

    Also, the media/academia have been waging war on objectivity and facts. Even the MSM, led by NYT, said it would have to suspend conventional journalist ethics to stop Trump. You see, the man is 'literally hitler', so ANYTHING goes.
    When it's a struggle between Good and Evil with nothing in between, then anything is justified in aiding the Good against Evil. After all, wasn't it justifiable for the Allies to go with the BS narrative on Katyn Massacre in order to defeat Nazism.
    Okay, there may be cases where the Evil is so great that we must tolerate necessary evils to defeat the Big Evil.

    PC hysteria sees everything in terms of Good vs Hitler. Even STAR WARS is now about Good vs White Evil. If you oppose 'gay marriage', even that is GREAT EVIL.
    PC sees everything in terms of Manichean struggle. Since there is only Good vs Evil, any lies or fantasies that serve the Good is justified since the Evil is so Evil.
    So, this young woman was infected and instilled with this mindset from the Power That Be. After all, journalism schools don't teach objectivity as a good anymore. It's all about the Narrative. (This mindset infects the academia as Jonathan Haidt pointed out. So-called Libs don't merely disagree with Cons but see Cons as evil or at best, retarded. Secular Cons are 'racist' and 'evil' cuz they believe in biological differences. Therefore, they must be banned. And religious cons are dumb cuz they believe in God. And even when secular cons turn out to be right on racial differences, they must be suppressed because the implications are too terrible.
    Things have got so bad that even Nicholas Kristof has gotten to arguing that the echo-chamber has gotten to incestuous in the academia.

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2016/12/how-radicals-destroyed-liberalism.html

    Also, history has been retold as a simple story of Good vs Evil. 'Racism' was totally evil, purely white, and there was nothing good about it. Jews were always totally good and innocent and never to be blamed for anything. 'Antisemitism' was never justified whereas Jews were always justified. The Civil Rights movement was about total good vs total bad with no grey areas. It was MLK as saint vs KKK.
    Of course, reality is never this simple, but the Narrative that kids grew up with painted such simple view of history. It's a comic book view of history.
    It's also worse cuz of fusion of Leftism and Pop Culture. There was a time when Leftism disdained Pop Culture as capitalist, commercial, simple-minded, and stupid. Sure, the Left always saw the usefulness of Pop Culture, but it didn't care for its vulgarity and crudeness.
    But as the Left got more Pop, its vision also became cruder and stupider. It turned morality into a Comic Book of superheroes and villains.
    Given that many kids grew up with only Pop Culture and PC, their view of reality is dumber and more simple-minded than leftisms of the past.
    In the 50s and 60s, the Left might make a sober movie about evils of 'racism' like BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK or TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD. In order to fight bigots, one should be dignified and sober. Good People had maturity and integrity, while bigots were filled with sadism, brutality, and ugliness.
    But as the Left embraced total vulgarization of culture, their positions got 'bigoted' in style. We can see this in Quentin Tarantino's INGLOROUS BASTERDS and DJANGO UNCHAINED. It's like the fantasy of Prog rednecks. Vulgar, trashy, and sadistic. It's not about good guys with dignity fighting brutal bad guys, but good guys acting like KKK thugs and Hollywood Nazis to defeat the bad guys. Nihilism is a big part of SJW culture.

    As insufferable and ridiculous as these SJWs of all color are, the fact that hate hoaxes have exploded so much in recent yrs goes to show that it's been encouraged and given green light by the Powers That Be. And now, with the Powers That Be screaming about Russia Stole the Election, Russia Stole the Election, and etc, it's just adding more fuel to the fire. The Power-that-be highlighted SJW hype and hysteria, not least after Trump won, uncritically reporting on SPLC claims of explosion of 'hate crimes' against Muslims and non-whites. Indeed, the MSM's cozy relation with SPLC and ADL, two big generators of hate hype and hate hoax, is part of the problem. So often, MSM will refer to SPLC without any disclaimer that the organization is run by sleazy Zionists who've raked tons of money by scare-mongering about non-existent KKK. SPLC is the final word, indeed the word of god. It must be true cuz SPLC said it.

    But then, the Right isn't innocent either. The so-called Right's pandering to lying and duplicitous Neocons has been downright shameful. And let's not forget all the dirty lies told by Bush I and Bush II to get us into war with Iraq. And then lies about Syria. Most of GOP was attacking Obama for not getting MORE INVOLVED against Assad. And GOP fully endorsed the lies about Russia in Ukraine. This culture of lies in the GOP has meant that every politician must repeat or exaggerate Neocon lies to get a piece of the pie. Consider that worthless Tom Cotton.
    This is why Alt Right stands apart. For all its faults(and some craziness), it is the only force out there that is willing to really challenge the Narrative.

    This Muslim whore is a piss-ant, but we must admit that the Central Command of the Culture of Lies in America is dominated by Jews, homos, and blacks. Jewish lies about Russia are downright hysterical. And we must fool ourselves that Palestinians and Iranians pose an 'existential' threat to Israel when Israel still occupies West Bank and has 300 nukes(to 0 for Iran). And we had to suffer the total BS of BLM that was endorsed by media, academia, and government. And homos told so many lies. Matthew Shepard was just tip of iceberg. Also, the notion that all those homos died of HIV cuz of Reagan!!!

    And where were Conservatives against such culture of lies? As fellow worshipers of MLK cult and afraid of being called 'racist', they were mum about black lies. As whores of Neocons who promised them more Jewish support and money, Conservatives went along with so many Zionist lies that led to so much misery in the Middle East, Russia, and EU. And since Conservatives suck up to Neocons and since Jews love homos, they were sheepish about taking on homo lies. So, ours became a Culture of Lies.

    While all groups have liars and cheats, they are not protected when they pull the alarm or break the law. Calling foul on Chinese espionage in the US, Russian subversion in the US, or Iranian support of terrorism is fair game.
    But we must never notice bad behavior and the lies of Jews, blacks, and homos. And since all three are heavily invested in SJW culture and movements, they've been able to push their Narrative far and wide without repercussion.

    We have to get to the source of this cancer. This Muslim girl is an idiot but just a skin cell. The real malignancy is with other powers.

    It's like Kurosawa said of BAD SLEEP WELL. He said the problem with the film was he didn't go far enough. He showed some bad guys but not the real big bad guys behind the bad guys.

    Focusing on idiots like this girl is like going after individual cancer cells in the body without addressing the core tumor that keeps on spewing out more cancer cells.

    There is a nexus of media, academia, finance, and government that sustains the anti-white Hate. From its vantage point(with heavy ethnic slant), the hysteria of SJW is necessary chemotherapy to keep the tumor of white supremacist cancer from growing. If left alone, they believe that White Nationalism will grow bigger and bigger and turn Nazi. So, constant pressure must be put on white society, and SJWs are the chemo that, though sometimes attacking innocent whites, is necessary evil to fight the greater evil. It's like the US justifies its sanctions that kills many innocents in order to contain the rogue regime of other nations.

    But this mania has gotten so out of hand that SJW madness isn't just attacking far-right tumor but everything deemed 'normal'. To be sure, such paranoia is understandable in a nation where the minority has gained dominance. Unlike majority power that can be secure and complacent, minority power is always uneasy since it is not natural for the few to control the many. It is not natural for 2% Jews to control gentile society. It is not natural for 2% of homos to control straight society. It is not natural for minority immigrant community to dictate to native society. It is not natural for 13% of blacks to push around majority that isn't black. So, minority power must always work over-time and over-the-top to beat down the majority. It's like the Spartan elites were ruthless in their constant attacks on the Helots who outnumbered them. It was to send a message to the Helots that ANY thought of dissent on their part would be crushed totally. So, don't even think about it. And this is the anti-white, anti-gentile, and anti-straight mindset among the minority elites and coalition.

    Of course, there are whites who take part in this madness. Some are just craven opportunists who will do or say anything. They just collaborate with power.

    But there's also the problem of Cold Compassion or Ruthless Morality.
    People wonder why Swedes, the descendants of the ruthless Vikings, turned into such sappy do-gooders. But in a way, the cold ruthlessness still remains. The rules have changed, but the heartlessness is the same. The Vikings were single-minded in their cold determination to plunder and loot and pillage. They felt no pity for their victims.
    Today's Progs in Sweden may seem so different as they profess to Care so much. But their commitment to Compassion is Cold as ice. Even though evidence is piling up that their actions are leading to mayhem, disaster, and chaos all over, their are coldly determined to push through this madness with ruthless precision and iron will.
    Warm Compassion has limits. While people with warmth might feel sympathy for people around the world, they would also admit to the limits of what Sweden could do, and they would also feel warmth for their fellow Swedes and not try to hurt them. But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do. It's like Hitler's ruthless decision to fight to the end and destroy all of Germany in the bargain. And this cold compassion was also with communists who could kill millions with the cold confidence that anything was justified to serve the cause.
    When a German prog says German cities will be majority non-German and that is a 'good thing', it's not about sappy compassion. It is a kind of coldness, a steely commitment to ideology of destruction as redemption. It is pathological, no less than Nazism. It is blind to destruction of people and culture since it is so sure of its rigor and rightness.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4F-bv9zTpo

    And we have such whites in the Prog movement in the US too. While some are craven and some are just sappy, some are ruthless in their cold compassion that is frozen in their dogma of what is correct and necessary. Keith Olbermann's nuttery is a good example. He is not just some sappy do-goody Lib. He is utterly determined and ruthless in his idea of righteousness, so much in fact that he is coldly blind and unfeeling to all the havoc it may cause.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XshMnvx6lw

    “But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do.”

    Well said. Having spent some time in Germany for work I find that are not very gregarious or open to foreigners, yet they proceeded with that bizarre welcoming of almost a million “refugees”, many of whom are not even who they say they are.

    And most Germans continue doing it with it even though the problems are very clear now for all to see, and they may even vote to keep Angela Merkel in power. When I was in Germany, a year ago, “Refugees welcome” signs where everywhere.

    In part I guess is that they were tired of being perceived as “Nazis” or “cold people” by the rest of the world and decided to make one big gesture to appear more welcoming.

    It didn’t work, of course. They are still called “Nazis” if they protest against immigration, they did not become magically more friendly, and even even some of the “refugees” now resent them because they did not find the “paradise” they were promised. Instead of integrating, the Muslims live in a society apart, parallel with German society but rarely with one touching the other.

    I don’t know about Scandinavians, but I don’t think Germans have a lot of “sappy compassion” for others. It is really more a pathological form of virtue signaling or a bizarre attempt to self-destruct themselves in the eyes of the world for perceived sins.

    • Replies: @Opinionator
    Interesting observations
    , @Stan Adams
    Interestingly, the Swedish and German immigrants I've met are mostly hardcore realists. (I suppose that's why they came over here.)

    An older Swedish lady I know - a retired Pan Am stewardess who now lives in the States - is openly critical of the immivasion. The last time I saw her, a few days before the election, she was remarking on how depressed she had been on her last trip home. "They're everywhere. They come to take from the government and the whole society and they give us nothing of value." I didn't contradict her.

    As we spoke, a couple of British tourists sitting nearby were giving us very dirty looks. I didn't care. If you can't handle the truth, then find another table.
  63. @Anonymous
    Here is what Emily Lenzer at The Atlantic had to say about Ioffe, a recent hire by Jeffrey Goldberg:

    Julia Ioffe made a mistake today on Twitter, which she regrets and for which she has publicly apologized. We're confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.
     
    Another recent hire is Franklin Foer of the New Republic.

    Also Foer is a purveyor of what is now called “fake news”.

    Here is Ioffe back in October tweeting her “badass” co-ethnic now co-worker’s story that was shopped around and picked up by lowly Slate:

    Julia Ioffe @juliaioffe

    Trump Tower had a special server to communicate with Russia’s Alfa Bank, reports the eternal badass @FranklinFoer.

    • Replies: @a reader
    ... with Russia’s Alfa Bank,

    which by the way ...
  64. We’re confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.

    Of this I have no doubt.

  65. @SPMoore8
    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn't need them anymore (he's independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There's just no market for print media nowadays.

    It is hard to tell exactly, since it is privately owned, but my impression is that since at least the 1990s The Atlantic had been losing money. It survived being passed among various vanity owners on the cachet of having been founded by a bunch of famous literary WASPs.

    Recently, it reinvented itself as clickbait for SWPLs, which made me stop subscribing, but perhaps characteristically, this strategy seems to be working (financially if not in promoting of truth). The Atlantic now claims to be mildly profitable.

    One casualty of The Atlantic‘s newfound “success”: the 1857 mission statement,

    The Atlantic will be the organ of no party or clique.”

    Oh well.

    • Replies: @jake
    That was always a lie. The Atlantic began as a rather narrow organ of elite Yankee WASPs and their prejudices.
  66. @Anonymous
    I love the usual tactic from those who've used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I've read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that's been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they've retconned them into isolated events.

    Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes.

    And what's more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there's a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    “I love the usual tactic from those who’ve used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that’s been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they’ve retconned them into isolated events.”

    What are those twelve hoaxes? How many actual “hate crime”–a term that to me personally is dubious, along with its legal implications–have occurred compared to those that turned out to be hoaxes in real numbers?

    “Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes.”

    I do not believe the false reporting meets the legal criteria for a “hate crime”, but certainly the person who made that false report ought to be proscecuted under the fullest extent of the law.

    “And what’s more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there’s a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    No, pal, let's try to get through this without idiot weaseling.

    The post-election Trumper hate crime wave the media have been writing breathlessly about. The SPLC fundraising drive.

    Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?

    Like http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/10/trump-supporter-beat-up-chicago-fight/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/16/anti-trump-high-school-students-beat-15-year-old-maryland-trump-supporter/

    or http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/

    Instead of

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/10/women-in-hijabs-on-2-campuses-say-they-were-attacked-by-men-invoking-donald-trump/

    http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/11/14/pittsburg-banner-with-racial-slur-taken-down/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/05/hate-hoax-villanova-student-withdraws-trump-voters-attack-claim/

    http://patch.com/massachusetts/malden/man-fabricated-story-racial-remarks-malden-bus-station-police

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/police-no-official-report-ugly-racial-incident-del-gas-station/

    http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/police-usf-student-arrested-for-lying-about-robbery

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/22/hate-hoax-another-student-fakes-mugging-claim-trump-fans/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/02/hate-hoax-black-man-arrested-racist-nazi-trump-graffiti/

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/11/25/north-park-university-trump-inspired-hate-crime-revealed-to-be-a-hoax/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/23/hate-hoax-student-fakes-anti-gay-notes-sent-trump-fan/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/14/hate-hoax-man-faked-kkk-crimes-abduction/

    and http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/21/hate-hoax-student-charged-claiming-rock-attack-trump-fans/

    That's 12 there, I don't think there are duplicates but please let me know if there are.

    You know perfectly well if the media had an incident with the kind of proof the anti-Trump hate crimes had they wouldn't be running with these crappy hoaxes.

    , @Tracy

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released
     
    From that article: "This year’s report, which contains data from 14,997 law enforcement agencies, reveals 5,850 criminal incidents and 6,885 related offenses that were motivated by bias against race, ethnicity, ancestry, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender, and gender identity."

    And here's Google's 710,000 returns for "Trump supporter attacked by leftist," sans quote marks.
  67. @Anonymous
    Also Foer is a purveyor of what is now called "fake news".

    Here is Ioffe back in October tweeting her "badass" co-ethnic now co-worker's story that was shopped around and picked up by lowly Slate:

    Julia Ioffe @juliaioffe

    Trump Tower had a special server to communicate with Russia's Alfa Bank, reports the eternal badass @FranklinFoer.

     

    … with Russia’s Alfa Bank,

    which by the way …

  68. this one was particularly shocking because it happened in New York and it seem no one tried to step in to help Seweid.

    Because it happened in New York? As opposed to what? The rude, uncivilized flyover zone?

  69. In the report the guy says something like “to add insult to injury, no one stood up to help her!”

    But the whole report was about three guys insulting her up to that point.

    Did all the editors die off?

  70. Virtually the entire civil rights movement has been a never-ending hate-crime hoax. Even Emmett Till was most likely a sexual predator in the making sent away from Chicago before his various thuggish antics got him beaten badly, or killed, by members of another set of black gang bangers.

  71. @Anonymous
    Looks like the story has been updated:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/muslim-woman-reported-trump-supporter-attack-made-story-article-1.2910944


    Muslim college student made up Trump supporter subway attack story to avoid punishment for missing curfew

    ...

    Police sources say Seweid made up the story because she didn’t want to get in trouble for breaking her curfew after being out late drinking with friends.

    Her strict, Muslim parents allegedly forced Seweid to shave her head over the incident and were upset that she was dating a Christian, sources said.

     

    from your link:

    In a bizarre twist, Seweid’s older brother, Abdoul, was also charged with falsely reporting an incident back in 2012.

    Albert Cahn, an attorney for the New York Chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the twist in Seweid’s case shouldn’t take away from the legitimate claims of bias and harassment against Muslims.

  72. @Harry Baldwin
    All my left-wing friends were sharing this story on Facebook when it was going around. I'm quite sure that if they hear it was a hoax that that will make no impression on them. They'll be just as likely to share the next such story. For them, wallowing in horror and pity about fake backlash against Muslims helps them suppress negative thoughts aroused by actual Muslim terrorism.

    True. Liberals almost never allow themselves to learn from things like hate-crime hoaxes. If they did, at least 90% of their Liberalism would dissipate, much of it into nothing.

  73. @Almost Missouri
    It is hard to tell exactly, since it is privately owned, but my impression is that since at least the 1990s The Atlantic had been losing money. It survived being passed among various vanity owners on the cachet of having been founded by a bunch of famous literary WASPs.

    Recently, it reinvented itself as clickbait for SWPLs, which made me stop subscribing, but perhaps characteristically, this strategy seems to be working (financially if not in promoting of truth). The Atlantic now claims to be mildly profitable.

    One casualty of The Atlantic's newfound "success": the 1857 mission statement,


    The Atlantic will be the organ of no party or clique.”
     
    Oh well.

    That was always a lie. The Atlantic began as a rather narrow organ of elite Yankee WASPs and their prejudices.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    That's a good point. They were part of the abolitionist clique, for example. Further, like today's SJWs, they probably thought their clique was nothing more than what all right-thinking people believe.

    OTOH, the early Atlantic was more literature and culture. The current Atlantic is obsessively political.
  74. @Dumbo

    "But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do."

     

    Well said. Having spent some time in Germany for work I find that are not very gregarious or open to foreigners, yet they proceeded with that bizarre welcoming of almost a million "refugees", many of whom are not even who they say they are.

    And most Germans continue doing it with it even though the problems are very clear now for all to see, and they may even vote to keep Angela Merkel in power. When I was in Germany, a year ago, "Refugees welcome" signs where everywhere.

    In part I guess is that they were tired of being perceived as "Nazis" or "cold people" by the rest of the world and decided to make one big gesture to appear more welcoming.

    It didn't work, of course. They are still called "Nazis" if they protest against immigration, they did not become magically more friendly, and even even some of the "refugees" now resent them because they did not find the "paradise" they were promised. Instead of integrating, the Muslims live in a society apart, parallel with German society but rarely with one touching the other.

    I don't know about Scandinavians, but I don't think Germans have a lot of "sappy compassion" for others. It is really more a pathological form of virtue signaling or a bizarre attempt to self-destruct themselves in the eyes of the world for perceived sins.

    Interesting observations

  75. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "I love the usual tactic from those who’ve used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that’s been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they’ve retconned them into isolated events."

    What are those twelve hoaxes? How many actual "hate crime"--a term that to me personally is dubious, along with its legal implications--have occurred compared to those that turned out to be hoaxes in real numbers?

    "Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes."

    I do not believe the false reporting meets the legal criteria for a "hate crime", but certainly the person who made that false report ought to be proscecuted under the fullest extent of the law.

    "And what’s more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there’s a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released

    No, pal, let’s try to get through this without idiot weaseling.

    The post-election Trumper hate crime wave the media have been writing breathlessly about. The SPLC fundraising drive.

    Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?

    Like http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/10/trump-supporter-beat-up-chicago-fight/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/16/anti-trump-high-school-students-beat-15-year-old-maryland-trump-supporter/

    or http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/

    Instead of

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/10/women-in-hijabs-on-2-campuses-say-they-were-attacked-by-men-invoking-donald-trump/

    http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/11/14/pittsburg-banner-with-racial-slur-taken-down/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/05/hate-hoax-villanova-student-withdraws-trump-voters-attack-claim/

    http://patch.com/massachusetts/malden/man-fabricated-story-racial-remarks-malden-bus-station-police

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/police-no-official-report-ugly-racial-incident-del-gas-station/

    http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/police-usf-student-arrested-for-lying-about-robbery

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/22/hate-hoax-another-student-fakes-mugging-claim-trump-fans/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/02/hate-hoax-black-man-arrested-racist-nazi-trump-graffiti/

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/11/25/north-park-university-trump-inspired-hate-crime-revealed-to-be-a-hoax/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/23/hate-hoax-student-fakes-anti-gay-notes-sent-trump-fan/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/14/hate-hoax-man-faked-kkk-crimes-abduction/

    and http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/21/hate-hoax-student-charged-claiming-rock-attack-trump-fans/

    That’s 12 there, I don’t think there are duplicates but please let me know if there are.

    You know perfectly well if the media had an incident with the kind of proof the anti-Trump hate crimes had they wouldn’t be running with these crappy hoaxes.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    #2 should be http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/11/13/pittsburg-police-to-issue-citation-on-banner-with-racial-slur/ but you could probably drop it anyway.
    , @Corvinus
    Thank you for reiterating my point. Out of the hundreds of actual cases of "hate crimes", there are a couple of dozen that are "hate hoaxes". However, the Coalition of the Right Fringe group narrative is that "hate crimes" in and of themselves are predominantly faked. Thus, any and all "hate crimes" are automatically to be deemed as suspicious, which makes it easier for CRF toadies to dismiss them entirely. Also, does not Breitbart have their own axe to grind similar to the NYT and WashPost? Do you merely lap up what the right has to say?

    "Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?"

    Just because video is lacking in cases of "hate crimes" does not mean that the evidence is weak. The prosecutor felt that the crime committed warranted this designation, that the facts in the case met the criteria. Thus, those instances have "substance".
  76. @Anonymous
    No, pal, let's try to get through this without idiot weaseling.

    The post-election Trumper hate crime wave the media have been writing breathlessly about. The SPLC fundraising drive.

    Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?

    Like http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/10/trump-supporter-beat-up-chicago-fight/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/16/anti-trump-high-school-students-beat-15-year-old-maryland-trump-supporter/

    or http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/

    Instead of

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/10/women-in-hijabs-on-2-campuses-say-they-were-attacked-by-men-invoking-donald-trump/

    http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/11/14/pittsburg-banner-with-racial-slur-taken-down/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/05/hate-hoax-villanova-student-withdraws-trump-voters-attack-claim/

    http://patch.com/massachusetts/malden/man-fabricated-story-racial-remarks-malden-bus-station-police

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/police-no-official-report-ugly-racial-incident-del-gas-station/

    http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/police-usf-student-arrested-for-lying-about-robbery

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/22/hate-hoax-another-student-fakes-mugging-claim-trump-fans/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/02/hate-hoax-black-man-arrested-racist-nazi-trump-graffiti/

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/11/25/north-park-university-trump-inspired-hate-crime-revealed-to-be-a-hoax/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/23/hate-hoax-student-fakes-anti-gay-notes-sent-trump-fan/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/14/hate-hoax-man-faked-kkk-crimes-abduction/

    and http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/21/hate-hoax-student-charged-claiming-rock-attack-trump-fans/

    That's 12 there, I don't think there are duplicates but please let me know if there are.

    You know perfectly well if the media had an incident with the kind of proof the anti-Trump hate crimes had they wouldn't be running with these crappy hoaxes.

  77. @Anonymous
    Here is what Emily Lenzer at The Atlantic had to say about Ioffe, a recent hire by Jeffrey Goldberg:

    Julia Ioffe made a mistake today on Twitter, which she regrets and for which she has publicly apologized. We're confident that when she joins The Atlantic next month she will adhere to our standards.
     
    Another recent hire is Franklin Foer of the New Republic.

    Franklin Foer was editor of the New Republic when he published this fiction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Thomas_Beauchamp_controversy.

    He will fit right in at the Atlantic.

  78. @Steve – Why is all the “hate” happening in New York and California, Democratic strongholds, by emboldened Trump Supporters – where the Deep South has almost no “hate”?

    https://agellius.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/

    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "@Steve – Why is all the “hate” happening in New York and California, Democratic strongholds, by emboldened Trump Supporters – where the Deep South has almost no “hate”?"

    Even Berkeley has had hate hoaxes involving the words Donald Trump and the KKK. FREAKING BERKELEY which is so Left Wing that even when California used to be a solid red state Berkeley bucked the trend as it was a solidly blue city. Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan got clobbered quite badly in Berkeley. It has been a whopping 60 years since the last time a Republican carried the county that Berkeley is located in. Steve Sailer was not even born yet. Annette Funicello was still a Mouseketeer on The Mickey Mouse Club and Buddy Holly was still alive. Disneyland was only 1 year old.

    Eventually most of California became as blue as Berkeley. Berkeley was well ahead of their time.

  79. @Charles Erwin Wilson

    I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer...
     
    Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?

    “Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?”

    My political philosophy takes into account my own confirmation biases and prejudices and looks at both sides as objectively as humanely possible. I am what some people call a “cuck”, but that characterization would describe a wide swath of conservatives and liberals who also try their best to critically analyze sources. Are you here for comic relief or are you here to learn more about your own positions?

    The point is that “hate crimes” occur, that whites -and- nonwhites engage in criminal activity against people, in some cases solely because of their racial or sexual background. In some cases, there are situations where the “victim” makes up the crime–they should be prosecuted. In those instances where “hate crimes” are legitimate, they also should be brought up on charges already on the books. These examples are NOT made up crimes, as some here would argue. Again, I find “hate crime” enhancements passed by legislators and used by prosecutors to be unnecessary.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    But you're playing stupid if you think the argument is that 100% of these incidents are fake. Obviously this is about how and why these incidents are used by the mainstream media to construct a narrative of red-capped Trump supporters running around making mayhem, which you can tell is especially threadbare because they keep betting their credibility on implausible (according to NYers), unverified claims which are nonetheless mass-retweeted by liberal hysterics looking for reasons to dump on us.

    Maybe you would understand if you got a taste of the way this incident was used to deplore Trumpers in liberal comment sections. Few if any will eat crow, but they will gobble up the next alleged hate crime without any doubts.

  80. @Jefferson
    "I thoroughly enjoy when Mr. Sailer and Vox Day tag team by exploring certain events that make mainstream news, which turn out to be other than accurate after being vetted (which, of course, there should be consequences for those that make those initial false reports), and then equate those situations as meaning any and all similar, future events are hoaxes. Because non-whites are generally liars."

    If they are not hoaxes committed by Nonwhite liars than why haven't any Trump supporters been arrested yet in all of these supposed "hate crimes" committed by Trump supporters against Muslims, Hispanics, African Americans, etc after the presidential election was over? Shouldn't our country's jails and prisons be flooded with Trump supporters right now if these were real hate crimes?

    “If they are not hoaxes committed by Nonwhite liars than why haven’t any Trump supporters been arrested yet in all of these supposed “hate crimes” committed by Trump supporters against Muslims, Hispanics, African Americans, etc after the presidential election was over?”

    Prosecutors have to look at the legal criteria in those cases and judge for themselves, at their discretion, if the standards are met. If it is absolutely determined that a crime was motivated by racial prejudice, then nonwhites for their brutal actions against whites ought to be charged with “hate crimes”. It’s called context, something who clearly lack in understanding.

    Again, “hate crime” legislation and prosecution is something I do not support.

    “Shouldn’t our country’s jails and prisons be flooded with Trump supporters right now if these were real hate crimes?”

    You mean when white people here who call out their fellow whites as being “bad whites” for not backing up the white race at all times? Is that not a “hate crime”?

  81. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "Your duplicity condemns what you have written. Why does your political philosophy require the reactive, relentless dishonesty of a criminal recidivist?"

    My political philosophy takes into account my own confirmation biases and prejudices and looks at both sides as objectively as humanely possible. I am what some people call a "cuck", but that characterization would describe a wide swath of conservatives and liberals who also try their best to critically analyze sources. Are you here for comic relief or are you here to learn more about your own positions?

    The point is that "hate crimes" occur, that whites -and- nonwhites engage in criminal activity against people, in some cases solely because of their racial or sexual background. In some cases, there are situations where the "victim" makes up the crime--they should be prosecuted. In those instances where "hate crimes" are legitimate, they also should be brought up on charges already on the books. These examples are NOT made up crimes, as some here would argue. Again, I find "hate crime" enhancements passed by legislators and used by prosecutors to be unnecessary.

    But you’re playing stupid if you think the argument is that 100% of these incidents are fake. Obviously this is about how and why these incidents are used by the mainstream media to construct a narrative of red-capped Trump supporters running around making mayhem, which you can tell is especially threadbare because they keep betting their credibility on implausible (according to NYers), unverified claims which are nonetheless mass-retweeted by liberal hysterics looking for reasons to dump on us.

    Maybe you would understand if you got a taste of the way this incident was used to deplore Trumpers in liberal comment sections. Few if any will eat crow, but they will gobble up the next alleged hate crime without any doubts.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    P.S. Probably the closest you'll get to a mea culpa from liberals is that hate hoaxes victimize actual hate victims... you know, the actual victims that we'd actually be talking about instead in the first place, if the actual victims were actual and the fakes weren't all the media had to put on blast.
  82. @Days of Broken Arrows
    Why is she in a hijab yet wearing full American-style makeup? I thought the whole purpose of hijabs was to downplay women's sexuality. Doesn't makeup sort of undo that? This, in my opinion, is the worst of both worlds: Old-style religion mixed with modern hypocrisy.

    I regularly see Muslim women wearing a) a hijab, and b) skin tight jeans that accentuate every curve.

  83. @Anonymous
    But you're playing stupid if you think the argument is that 100% of these incidents are fake. Obviously this is about how and why these incidents are used by the mainstream media to construct a narrative of red-capped Trump supporters running around making mayhem, which you can tell is especially threadbare because they keep betting their credibility on implausible (according to NYers), unverified claims which are nonetheless mass-retweeted by liberal hysterics looking for reasons to dump on us.

    Maybe you would understand if you got a taste of the way this incident was used to deplore Trumpers in liberal comment sections. Few if any will eat crow, but they will gobble up the next alleged hate crime without any doubts.

    P.S. Probably the closest you’ll get to a mea culpa from liberals is that hate hoaxes victimize actual hate victims… you know, the actual victims that we’d actually be talking about instead in the first place, if the actual victims were actual and the fakes weren’t all the media had to put on blast.

  84. @SPMoore8
    The Atlantic has to change its model or it will tank. It has gone full SJW in recent years and is unreadable, and even TN Coates doesn't need them anymore (he's independently wealthy, at this point.)

    I expect that Goldblog will attempt to hire a lot of his friends to re-orient Atlantic to a more Jewish-Zionist orientation, such as New Republic and the experimental New York Sun; maybe draw off some readership from essentially moribund rags like Commentary and National Review.

    I expect it will fail in a couple of years. There's just no market for print media nowadays.

    The hard copy The Atlantic magazine was excellent in the early 1990s. It wrote honest articles on crime, immigration, Islam, culture from a secular honest liberal perspective.

    This is my own perspective – intelligent, honest, secular liberal perspective.

    But today’s The Atlantic is increasingly just a blog that churns out predictable PC left Tweets.

    Some exceptions were:

    “What ISIS really wants”

    That was the best article of the year from Left to Right.

    • Replies: @Desiderius

    The hard copy The Atlantic magazine was excellent in the early 1990s. It wrote honest articles on crime, immigration, Islam, culture from a secular honest liberal perspective.

    This is my own perspective – intelligent, honest, secular liberal perspective.
     
    Agreed, and into the 2000's. Mike Kelly may have been the dearest casualty of the Iraq War.
  85. @Olorin
    Well, smash my buret and call me a biologist...

    ...but I think she did this as the aggrievement-asserting PC-mating-call of the heavily-made-up-selfie subspecies of the teenage Muslim female.

    What better way to meet upscale mates in NYC?

    I mean, she is a Baruch student. Maybe she perceives the MRS degrees there passing her by.

    Q. What tactic evolutionarily drives marriageable females?
    A. Being visible in the market to high-quality males.
    Extra bonus points: tell a story that elicits their principled protectiveness.
    Connects easily to UVA faux accusation.

    • Replies: @Olorin
    Even more interestingly, I'm seeing reports that she was well on her way in the modern US mating game...but made up this tale to get back at Auld Sod dad. Apparently was out drinking till the wee house with friends, knew dad unit would be furious, did it anyway, then I guess thought better of it on the way home.

    Inventing a hate crime to turn Egyptian Muslim dad's anger into her (faux) US secular victimization is a prime example of why the whole category of "hate crime" has to be abolished. Nobody wins, and crazies waste everybody's time, attention, and money.

    But then her claiming white male adherents of the world's most alpha and prominent modern white Dad figure attacked her for being part of a Dark Ages religious cult, and other whites stood by and let it happen?

    Damn, that's just nutty.

    I mean, how many whites do you see on the 6 line at that time of week/day?

    FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5'10", 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and "Timberland boots," and a clean shaven blond man, same size.

    Yeah, and his friends kept calling him Haven.
    , @Dieter Kief
    I agree.

    Erich Fromm called this character-trait market-oriented. -

    Therefor again: It's not a hate-thing. This categorization is misleading.
  86. The sister weighs in: https://twitter.com/missyasin/status/809423457159102464

    These people are utterly deranged. Is it somehow forbidden for Muslims to express unconditional remorse for anything? Are there no limits to ostentatious Muslim victimhood?

  87. These Muslim women lie in order to make their attire a part of their victim identity while their counterparts in Muslim countries are arrested and beaten for not wearing veils or whatever.

  88. @Tiny Duck
    We must remember that theses rare hoaxes detract from the very real attacks and threats that People of Color suffer on a daily basis.

    ….sigh.

    You’re mailing it in Tiny…..I’ve come to expect better from you!

  89. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Choice quote:

    I’m deeply concerned about the mental state of young Muslim women who feel that they have to lie so intensely to survive. I know this isn’t the first time something like this happens so I really think people who are concerned about how Muslims will be perceived in the media or how future hate crimes will be dealt with need to take a step back and think why muslim woc have felt the need to do this. Its not for attention. The NYPD doesn’t care about us or our safety. Never did. This won’t make things for Muslims any worse than they have been. Why do you only care about violence against muslim women if its perpetuated by the state? You don’t think calling for an 18 year old girl to be jailed for lying to be violent and abhorrent?

    Also, it became salient to me that community is a myth and that people who in one breathe scream about being unified under one ummah & helping each other out will say that an 18 year old Muslim girl should go to jail.

    My sister may have lied but she had dealt with an insurmountable amount of violence and trauma both publicly and privately these past two weeks. I ask you to kindly stop adding to it and making things worse.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Sounds like some in the ummah are taking her to task for this, at least.
  90. @Anonymous
    Choice quote:

    I'm deeply concerned about the mental state of young Muslim women who feel that they have to lie so intensely to survive. I know this isn't the first time something like this happens so I really think people who are concerned about how Muslims will be perceived in the media or how future hate crimes will be dealt with need to take a step back and think why muslim woc have felt the need to do this. Its not for attention. The NYPD doesn't care about us or our safety. Never did. This won't make things for Muslims any worse than they have been. Why do you only care about violence against muslim women if its perpetuated by the state? You don't think calling for an 18 year old girl to be jailed for lying to be violent and abhorrent?

    Also, it became salient to me that community is a myth and that people who in one breathe scream about being unified under one ummah & helping each other out will say that an 18 year old Muslim girl should go to jail.

    My sister may have lied but she had dealt with an insurmountable amount of violence and trauma both publicly and privately these past two weeks. I ask you to kindly stop adding to it and making things worse.
     

    Sounds like some in the ummah are taking her to task for this, at least.

  91. That is also another example of flight from white. She says the men who attacked her were white, implying that she herself is not.

    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "That is also another example of flight from white. She says the men who attacked her were white, implying that she herself is not".

    She is Egyptian. If Jews who are 52 percent European are not White, than Egyptians who are zero percent European and have more Sub Saharan African admixture than Jews sure as hell are not White either.
  92. These reports are particularly implausible to people like me who live in NYC and regularly use the subway.

    I see 4-5 women with hijabs on most of my commutes. Furthermore the large of subway riders are black, latino, asians, and immigrants.

    The idea that a bunch of white guys get on and start attacking a Muslim or a minority is ridiculous. You would literally have to attack everyone you see everywhere and assume everyone else wouldn’t respond.

    It is more likely that someone with a Trump hat would be attacked. But even that is very unlikely.

    Notice these hate crimes only happen in the most implausible areas? New School of Social Research (home of the Frankfurt School), Brooklyn Heights (neighborhood of white gentry liberals that voted 90% for Clinton), and subway cars that carry the most diverse populations in the planet. Etc.

  93. @MC
    I'm in full Chernyshevsky mode with these media-credibility-destroying hoaxes: the worse the better.

    Everything the media does to beclown itself is one step closer to full enlightenment. Exhibit B for today is Julia Ioffe:
    https://www.poynter.org/2016/politico-severs-ties-with-writer-after-vulgar-trump-tweet/442889/

    Let’s see if Tim Wise gets in trouble for this gem

  94. WaPo, 12/14/16 – A man set his ex’s car on fire for revenge, then blamed it on the KKK, police say

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/12/14/a-man-set-his-exs-car-on-fire-for-revenge-then-blamed-it-on-the-kkk-police-say/?utm_term=.3feed2c19321

    …She had found bloody fingerprints on her car and her brother’s jacket lying in the street. A threatening note was nearby — and her brother, Vincent Palmer, was nowhere to be found.

    “Apparently, somebody supposedly got my brother,” the woman told the dispatcher on Florida’s Atlantic Coast. “There’s blood in the car. Somebody left a note in the car and it says ‘KKK. I hate black men who f— with white women. You will never see your grandson again alive.’ ”

    But things didn’t add up…In a three-day span, they say, Palmer set his ex-girlfriend’s car on fire, wrote two racist notes as part of a staged hate crime, faked his own abduction and was arrested twice…It was all part of an elaborate but ultimately doomed scheme to get back at his ex and avoid paying child support, authorities and the woman’s mother say.

    Police say Vincent Palmer faked a hate crime, then his own abduction, to avoid paying back child support. He was not successful…

    Police believe Palmer put the arson plan in motion early Friday…He headed for his girlfriend’s house about 4:35 a.m., the police report says, and stopped along the way at a gas station, where he filled a Mountain Dew bottle with gasoline.

    When he got to his ex’s house, police say, he taped a note to her mailbox: “I HAVE WATHED [sic] YOU FOR A LONG TIME YOU AND YOUR N—– KIDS DON’T Belong.”

    On the other side he wrote one word: “TRUMP.”

    Then, the police report says, Palmer scooped up a brick from a neighbor’s yard and shattered the back window of his ex’s Chevrolet Sonic. He then doused the back seat with gasoline, used a burning piece of paper to ignite a fire and made a hasty exit on his scooter, police say…

  95. CNN has been going on and on and on about the Dylann Roof case. Fifteen minutes of nothing but Dylann Roof.

    Roof is a fucking moron. Any white supremacist who strikes out publicly is simply giving the media grist for its multiculti bullshit mill. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I’d speculate that he was working for the PC forces.

    I don’t hate Jews or blacks, but if I did, I wouldn’t be dumb enough to shout it from the mountaintops.

    Proclaiming yourself publicly as a white supremacist is a losing proposition.

  96. @Dumbo

    "But the icy Cold Compassion of progs in Sweden and Germany is something more than weakness or sappy pity. There is a kind of Teutonic iron determination among Germans to push it through all the way regardless of the harm it may do."

     

    Well said. Having spent some time in Germany for work I find that are not very gregarious or open to foreigners, yet they proceeded with that bizarre welcoming of almost a million "refugees", many of whom are not even who they say they are.

    And most Germans continue doing it with it even though the problems are very clear now for all to see, and they may even vote to keep Angela Merkel in power. When I was in Germany, a year ago, "Refugees welcome" signs where everywhere.

    In part I guess is that they were tired of being perceived as "Nazis" or "cold people" by the rest of the world and decided to make one big gesture to appear more welcoming.

    It didn't work, of course. They are still called "Nazis" if they protest against immigration, they did not become magically more friendly, and even even some of the "refugees" now resent them because they did not find the "paradise" they were promised. Instead of integrating, the Muslims live in a society apart, parallel with German society but rarely with one touching the other.

    I don't know about Scandinavians, but I don't think Germans have a lot of "sappy compassion" for others. It is really more a pathological form of virtue signaling or a bizarre attempt to self-destruct themselves in the eyes of the world for perceived sins.

    Interestingly, the Swedish and German immigrants I’ve met are mostly hardcore realists. (I suppose that’s why they came over here.)

    An older Swedish lady I know – a retired Pan Am stewardess who now lives in the States – is openly critical of the immivasion. The last time I saw her, a few days before the election, she was remarking on how depressed she had been on her last trip home. “They’re everywhere. They come to take from the government and the whole society and they give us nothing of value.” I didn’t contradict her.

    As we spoke, a couple of British tourists sitting nearby were giving us very dirty looks. I didn’t care. If you can’t handle the truth, then find another table.

  97. @David
    " Because non-whites are generally liars."

    Whiny too.

    How come you can post under that name from anywhere but I can only do it form my desk?

  98. @Jefferson
    "This is an obvious fake, the chances that three white men on a subway car in NYC of all places doing that is practically unfathomable."

    Most people who take the NYC subway are Asian, African American and Hispanic. I have an extremely hard time believing that The Coalition Of The Fringes would just stand by, watch, and do nothing as 3 White men bully a Muslim woman. The 3 White men would not have gotten out of the train alive or if they did they would leave in a stretcher. All of The Coalition Of The Fringes would be united in giving these 3 White men an ass whooping.

    It’s not that. It just doesn’t happen like that. And there are whites on the subway. Probably anyone would have helped her if that actually had happened.

    Sentator Kirsten Gillibrand mad a big deal about people supposedly not helping this girl. And Cuomo has his hate crime ask force now. It’s all a bunch of BS.

    BTW, she made it up because she was out drinking with friends and didn’t want her strict Egyptian Muslim family to find out. They live out on Long Island. her brother was caught stealing electronics out of cars and also made up some story about 3 people harassing him and his friends.

    She’s been in trouble at home for becoming to westernized and her dad was mad about a catholic boyfriend.

    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "It’s not that."

    It is that. Try being an out of the closet Trump supporter on a NYC subway without having a gang of vibrantly diversity kicking your ass. 3 White guys chanting TRUMP to a Muslim woman on a NYC subway train would have gotten their asses whooped by guys who look like Nino Brown from New Jack City.
  99. It’s the same with Yasmin Seweid as it was with Erdely and Coakley in the Rolling-Stone hoax – listen to her in the interview: She is not in a hate-mood.
    This hoax seems to be less about the others (=Trump), whom she’d hate, it’s about herself: She is dreamy and self-absorbed; she wants to communicate something important, something that makes her recognised and – acknowledged.
    I can understand, that hate-crime is an established term. But even though – this expression is not good, because it is too far off of what’s going on in her heart – and in her mind.

  100. I think she was really harassed by Russian agents.

  101. Great headline, Steve. But how will criminal charges affect this girl’s modeling prospects? And is a hate hoax really a good career move if you’re not part of Black Lives Matter?

  102. @dilys
    Q. What tactic evolutionarily drives marriageable females?
    A. Being visible in the market to high-quality males.
    Extra bonus points: tell a story that elicits their principled protectiveness.
    Connects easily to UVA faux accusation.

    Even more interestingly, I’m seeing reports that she was well on her way in the modern US mating game…but made up this tale to get back at Auld Sod dad. Apparently was out drinking till the wee house with friends, knew dad unit would be furious, did it anyway, then I guess thought better of it on the way home.

    Inventing a hate crime to turn Egyptian Muslim dad’s anger into her (faux) US secular victimization is a prime example of why the whole category of “hate crime” has to be abolished. Nobody wins, and crazies waste everybody’s time, attention, and money.

    But then her claiming white male adherents of the world’s most alpha and prominent modern white Dad figure attacked her for being part of a Dark Ages religious cult, and other whites stood by and let it happen?

    Damn, that’s just nutty.

    I mean, how many whites do you see on the 6 line at that time of week/day?

    FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5’10”, 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and “Timberland boots,” and a clean shaven blond man, same size.

    Yeah, and his friends kept calling him Haven.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Same basic story as Tawana Brawley in 1987.
    , @Jefferson
    "FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5’10″, 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and “Timberland boots,” and a clean shaven blond man, same size."

    She should have described all 3 of her nonexistent White male attackers as having blond hair, instead of describing only 1 out of 3 as having blond hair. 3 Blond Nordic Aryans bullying the black haired Semitic Egyptian Muslim woman, the type of story that would have the mainstream media drooling at the mouth. And a police sketch artist draws them as all looking as blond as Patrick Swayze did in the film Point Break.

  103. @Jack ryan
    The hard copy The Atlantic magazine was excellent in the early 1990s. It wrote honest articles on crime, immigration, Islam, culture from a secular honest liberal perspective.

    This is my own perspective - intelligent, honest, secular liberal perspective.

    But today's The Atlantic is increasingly just a blog that churns out predictable PC left Tweets.

    Some exceptions were:

    "What ISIS really wants"

    That was the best article of the year from Left to Right.

    The hard copy The Atlantic magazine was excellent in the early 1990s. It wrote honest articles on crime, immigration, Islam, culture from a secular honest liberal perspective.

    This is my own perspective – intelligent, honest, secular liberal perspective.

    Agreed, and into the 2000’s. Mike Kelly may have been the dearest casualty of the Iraq War.

  104. @Olorin
    Even more interestingly, I'm seeing reports that she was well on her way in the modern US mating game...but made up this tale to get back at Auld Sod dad. Apparently was out drinking till the wee house with friends, knew dad unit would be furious, did it anyway, then I guess thought better of it on the way home.

    Inventing a hate crime to turn Egyptian Muslim dad's anger into her (faux) US secular victimization is a prime example of why the whole category of "hate crime" has to be abolished. Nobody wins, and crazies waste everybody's time, attention, and money.

    But then her claiming white male adherents of the world's most alpha and prominent modern white Dad figure attacked her for being part of a Dark Ages religious cult, and other whites stood by and let it happen?

    Damn, that's just nutty.

    I mean, how many whites do you see on the 6 line at that time of week/day?

    FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5'10", 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and "Timberland boots," and a clean shaven blond man, same size.

    Yeah, and his friends kept calling him Haven.

    Same basic story as Tawana Brawley in 1987.

  105. @Langley
    Towanda!
    or
    Tawana!

    The cry of the lonely.

    From American Renaissance.

    Yasmin and Tawana have the same profile.

    http://www.amren.com/podcasts/2016/12/crying-trump-latest-hate-crime-hoaxes/

  106. @jake
    That was always a lie. The Atlantic began as a rather narrow organ of elite Yankee WASPs and their prejudices.

    That’s a good point. They were part of the abolitionist clique, for example. Further, like today’s SJWs, they probably thought their clique was nothing more than what all right-thinking people believe.

    OTOH, the early Atlantic was more literature and culture. The current Atlantic is obsessively political.

  107. @hhsiii
    It's not that. It just doesn't happen like that. And there are whites on the subway. Probably anyone would have helped her if that actually had happened.

    Sentator Kirsten Gillibrand mad a big deal about people supposedly not helping this girl. And Cuomo has his hate crime ask force now. It's all a bunch of BS.

    BTW, she made it up because she was out drinking with friends and didn't want her strict Egyptian Muslim family to find out. They live out on Long Island. her brother was caught stealing electronics out of cars and also made up some story about 3 people harassing him and his friends.

    She's been in trouble at home for becoming to westernized and her dad was mad about a catholic boyfriend.

    “It’s not that.”

    It is that. Try being an out of the closet Trump supporter on a NYC subway without having a gang of vibrantly diversity kicking your ass. 3 White guys chanting TRUMP to a Muslim woman on a NYC subway train would have gotten their asses whooped by guys who look like Nino Brown from New Jack City.

  108. @Olorin
    Even more interestingly, I'm seeing reports that she was well on her way in the modern US mating game...but made up this tale to get back at Auld Sod dad. Apparently was out drinking till the wee house with friends, knew dad unit would be furious, did it anyway, then I guess thought better of it on the way home.

    Inventing a hate crime to turn Egyptian Muslim dad's anger into her (faux) US secular victimization is a prime example of why the whole category of "hate crime" has to be abolished. Nobody wins, and crazies waste everybody's time, attention, and money.

    But then her claiming white male adherents of the world's most alpha and prominent modern white Dad figure attacked her for being part of a Dark Ages religious cult, and other whites stood by and let it happen?

    Damn, that's just nutty.

    I mean, how many whites do you see on the 6 line at that time of week/day?

    FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5'10", 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and "Timberland boots," and a clean shaven blond man, same size.

    Yeah, and his friends kept calling him Haven.

    “FWIW, I read that the description she gave of her attackers was one clean shaven white man, brown hair and eyes, 5’10″, 170; another of the same description wearing a hoodie and “Timberland boots,” and a clean shaven blond man, same size.”

    She should have described all 3 of her nonexistent White male attackers as having blond hair, instead of describing only 1 out of 3 as having blond hair. 3 Blond Nordic Aryans bullying the black haired Semitic Egyptian Muslim woman, the type of story that would have the mainstream media drooling at the mouth. And a police sketch artist draws them as all looking as blond as Patrick Swayze did in the film Point Break.

  109. One of the MSM outlets went to the standard explanation/rationalization that she was having emotional/psychological problems.

    BTW, that’s what a judge the other day with Michael Sanford, the illegal immigrant from England who tried to assassinate Trump: “You have a medical problem. You should not be ashamed or embarrassed about it. You need medication,” Judge James Mahan said in court, speaking to Sandford.

    “You’re not a hardened criminal. You’re not evil or a sociopath like a lot of people we have. I don’t think you wanted to kill anybody. This was just some crazy stunt that your mind told you to do,” Mahan added.

    http://www.guns.com/2016/12/15/man-who-tried-to-take-cops-gun-at-trump-rally-sentenced-to-1-year/

    Squeaky Fromme got life in prison for trying to shoot Gerald Ford. She had mental problems, too.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Thanks! I'll post.
  110. New term: narrative sitting.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Narrative-sitting directly impairs the capacity of news media to do their jobs.

    Their job is to find out when new things happen and inform the public. That's why it's called "news." Well, a new thing happened, in fact it happened a while ago - the bullies and operators switched sides, from anti-foreigner to anti-American. But since that contradicts the narrative, that new thing is not reported. They're literally not doing their jobs.
  111. @J1234
    One of the MSM outlets went to the standard explanation/rationalization that she was having emotional/psychological problems.

    BTW, that's what a judge the other day with Michael Sanford, the illegal immigrant from England who tried to assassinate Trump: “You have a medical problem. You should not be ashamed or embarrassed about it. You need medication,” Judge James Mahan said in court, speaking to Sandford.

    “You’re not a hardened criminal. You’re not evil or a sociopath like a lot of people we have. I don’t think you wanted to kill anybody. This was just some crazy stunt that your mind told you to do,” Mahan added.

    http://www.guns.com/2016/12/15/man-who-tried-to-take-cops-gun-at-trump-rally-sentenced-to-1-year/

    Squeaky Fromme got life in prison for trying to shoot Gerald Ford. She had mental problems, too.

    Thanks! I’ll post.

    • Replies: @J1234
    I think guns . com got the article from the Guardian.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/13/briton-michael-sandford-jailed-over-plan-to-shoot-donald-trump

    I'm amazed that the judge's comments are almost non-existent in American MSM coverage of the story (which, itself, is almost non-existent. ) The AP article on it does mention some of the judge's comments, though.
  112. @dilys
    Q. What tactic evolutionarily drives marriageable females?
    A. Being visible in the market to high-quality males.
    Extra bonus points: tell a story that elicits their principled protectiveness.
    Connects easily to UVA faux accusation.

    I agree.

    Erich Fromm called this character-trait market-oriented. –

    Therefor again: It’s not a hate-thing. This categorization is misleading.

  113. @SF
    That is also another example of flight from white. She says the men who attacked her were white, implying that she herself is not.

    “That is also another example of flight from white. She says the men who attacked her were white, implying that she herself is not”.

    She is Egyptian. If Jews who are 52 percent European are not White, than Egyptians who are zero percent European and have more Sub Saharan African admixture than Jews sure as hell are not White either.

    • Replies: @SF
    Well, I think Carleton Coon had it fundamentally right when he classified most middle eastern people as Caucasians, even though he did not have the benefit of genetics. And the ancestors of most Europeans came from the middle east or central Asia.
  114. @GeorgeG
    @Steve - Why is all the "hate" happening in New York and California, Democratic strongholds, by emboldened Trump Supporters - where the Deep South has almost no "hate"?

    https://agellius.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/

    “@Steve – Why is all the “hate” happening in New York and California, Democratic strongholds, by emboldened Trump Supporters – where the Deep South has almost no “hate”?”

    Even Berkeley has had hate hoaxes involving the words Donald Trump and the KKK. FREAKING BERKELEY which is so Left Wing that even when California used to be a solid red state Berkeley bucked the trend as it was a solidly blue city. Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan got clobbered quite badly in Berkeley. It has been a whopping 60 years since the last time a Republican carried the county that Berkeley is located in. Steve Sailer was not even born yet. Annette Funicello was still a Mouseketeer on The Mickey Mouse Club and Buddy Holly was still alive. Disneyland was only 1 year old.

    Eventually most of California became as blue as Berkeley. Berkeley was well ahead of their time.

  115. @Anonymous
    No, pal, let's try to get through this without idiot weaseling.

    The post-election Trumper hate crime wave the media have been writing breathlessly about. The SPLC fundraising drive.

    Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?

    Like http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/10/trump-supporter-beat-up-chicago-fight/

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/16/anti-trump-high-school-students-beat-15-year-old-maryland-trump-supporter/

    or http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/

    Instead of

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/10/women-in-hijabs-on-2-campuses-say-they-were-attacked-by-men-invoking-donald-trump/

    http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/11/14/pittsburg-banner-with-racial-slur-taken-down/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/05/hate-hoax-villanova-student-withdraws-trump-voters-attack-claim/

    http://patch.com/massachusetts/malden/man-fabricated-story-racial-remarks-malden-bus-station-police

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/police-no-official-report-ugly-racial-incident-del-gas-station/

    http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/police-usf-student-arrested-for-lying-about-robbery

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/22/hate-hoax-another-student-fakes-mugging-claim-trump-fans/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/02/hate-hoax-black-man-arrested-racist-nazi-trump-graffiti/

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/11/25/north-park-university-trump-inspired-hate-crime-revealed-to-be-a-hoax/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/23/hate-hoax-student-fakes-anti-gay-notes-sent-trump-fan/

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/14/hate-hoax-man-faked-kkk-crimes-abduction/

    and http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/21/hate-hoax-student-charged-claiming-rock-attack-trump-fans/

    That's 12 there, I don't think there are duplicates but please let me know if there are.

    You know perfectly well if the media had an incident with the kind of proof the anti-Trump hate crimes had they wouldn't be running with these crappy hoaxes.

    Thank you for reiterating my point. Out of the hundreds of actual cases of “hate crimes”, there are a couple of dozen that are “hate hoaxes”. However, the Coalition of the Right Fringe group narrative is that “hate crimes” in and of themselves are predominantly faked. Thus, any and all “hate crimes” are automatically to be deemed as suspicious, which makes it easier for CRF toadies to dismiss them entirely. Also, does not Breitbart have their own axe to grind similar to the NYT and WashPost? Do you merely lap up what the right has to say?

    “Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?”

    Just because video is lacking in cases of “hate crimes” does not mean that the evidence is weak. The prosecutor felt that the crime committed warranted this designation, that the facts in the case met the criteria. Thus, those instances have “substance”.

    • Replies: @res

    Out of the hundreds of actual cases of “hate crimes”, there are a couple of dozen that are “hate hoaxes”.
     
    Do you have any evidence to support this contention? For someone who roundly criticizes unsupported statements you certainly have an affection for them and an aversion to actual evidence.

    I'll note that earlier in this thread you posted:

    What are those twelve hoaxes?
     
    Nothing like moving the goalposts. That's exactly the kind of thing someone does when they don't have a substantive argument.

    And of course, when Anonymous supplied you with twelve examples (and three examples of documented attacks on Trump supporters) and asked you to find cases to support your point: "Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?"
    all we got was derision. Surely some of those "hundreds" of hate crimes have resulted in evidence that holds up under scrutiny? Especially given how a negligible number of hate crimes against Trump supporters have resulted in substantial video evidence.
  116. @Anonymous
    New term: narrative sitting.

    https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/809512085038186497

    Narrative-sitting directly impairs the capacity of news media to do their jobs.

    Their job is to find out when new things happen and inform the public. That’s why it’s called “news.” Well, a new thing happened, in fact it happened a while ago – the bullies and operators switched sides, from anti-foreigner to anti-American. But since that contradicts the narrative, that new thing is not reported. They’re literally not doing their jobs.

  117. @Steve Sailer
    Thanks! I'll post.

    I think guns . com got the article from the Guardian.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/13/briton-michael-sandford-jailed-over-plan-to-shoot-donald-trump

    I’m amazed that the judge’s comments are almost non-existent in American MSM coverage of the story (which, itself, is almost non-existent. ) The AP article on it does mention some of the judge’s comments, though.

  118. @Corvinus
    "I love the usual tactic from those who’ve used such occurrences (this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?) to cement the dominant liberal narrative that’s been put on blast of a hate crime wave: suddenly, they’ve retconned them into isolated events."

    What are those twelve hoaxes? How many actual "hate crime"--a term that to me personally is dubious, along with its legal implications--have occurred compared to those that turned out to be hoaxes in real numbers?

    "Not only that, but they entirely miss the point that these hate hoaxes are themselves blood libels, i.e. hate crimes."

    I do not believe the false reporting meets the legal criteria for a "hate crime", but certainly the person who made that false report ought to be proscecuted under the fullest extent of the law.

    "And what’s more, there have been actual video proofs of anti-Trump hate crimes, and none from the other side, so if there’s a hate crime wave out there, what does it really look like?

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015-hate-crime-statistics-released

    From that article: “This year’s report, which contains data from 14,997 law enforcement agencies, reveals 5,850 criminal incidents and 6,885 related offenses that were motivated by bias against race, ethnicity, ancestry, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender, and gender identity.”

    And here’s Google’s 710,000 returns for “Trump supporter attacked by leftist,” sans quote marks.

  119. @Corvinus
    Thank you for reiterating my point. Out of the hundreds of actual cases of "hate crimes", there are a couple of dozen that are "hate hoaxes". However, the Coalition of the Right Fringe group narrative is that "hate crimes" in and of themselves are predominantly faked. Thus, any and all "hate crimes" are automatically to be deemed as suspicious, which makes it easier for CRF toadies to dismiss them entirely. Also, does not Breitbart have their own axe to grind similar to the NYT and WashPost? Do you merely lap up what the right has to say?

    "Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?"

    Just because video is lacking in cases of "hate crimes" does not mean that the evidence is weak. The prosecutor felt that the crime committed warranted this designation, that the facts in the case met the criteria. Thus, those instances have "substance".

    Out of the hundreds of actual cases of “hate crimes”, there are a couple of dozen that are “hate hoaxes”.

    Do you have any evidence to support this contention? For someone who roundly criticizes unsupported statements you certainly have an affection for them and an aversion to actual evidence.

    I’ll note that earlier in this thread you posted:

    What are those twelve hoaxes?

    Nothing like moving the goalposts. That’s exactly the kind of thing someone does when they don’t have a substantive argument.

    And of course, when Anonymous supplied you with twelve examples (and three examples of documented attacks on Trump supporters) and asked you to find cases to support your point: “Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?”
    all we got was derision. Surely some of those “hundreds” of hate crimes have resulted in evidence that holds up under scrutiny? Especially given how a negligible number of hate crimes against Trump supporters have resulted in substantial video evidence.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Do you have any evidence to support this contention? For someone who roundly criticizes unsupported statements you certainly have an affection for them and an aversion to actual evidence."

    Had you carefully read this thread, I provided the FBI statistics regarding "hate crimes", and Anonymous (77) provided for those reported "hate hoaxes".

    This sources shows "[a] picture that emerges isn't a wave of hoaxes, a wave of attacks on minorities by Trump-emboldened bigots, nor a wave of attacks on Trump supporters by intolerant liberals—though all have occurred—but something more complex and, hopefully, a little less frightening, even if the stories that have happened are still horrible."

    http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/18/election-hate-crimes-hoaxes-hyperbole

    "Nothing like moving the goalposts. That’s exactly the kind of thing someone does when they don’t have a substantive argument."

    No goalposts were moved. Anonymous stated, "this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?)." I merely inquired "What are those 12 hoaxes"? for clarification. He then offered those stories.

    "and asked you to find cases to support your point: “Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?” all we got was derision."

    The FBI statistics, as well as the keywords "hate crimes against blacks" (without quotes) provides the requisite stories and substance.

    "Especially given how a negligible number of hate crimes against Trump supporters have resulted in substantial video evidence."

    Assuming that the circumstances involved meets the criteria for "hate crimes", according to the DA's. Which, again, "hate crime" is a dubious legal tool.
  120. @Jefferson
    "That is also another example of flight from white. She says the men who attacked her were white, implying that she herself is not".

    She is Egyptian. If Jews who are 52 percent European are not White, than Egyptians who are zero percent European and have more Sub Saharan African admixture than Jews sure as hell are not White either.

    Well, I think Carleton Coon had it fundamentally right when he classified most middle eastern people as Caucasians, even though he did not have the benefit of genetics. And the ancestors of most Europeans came from the middle east or central Asia.

  121. @res

    Out of the hundreds of actual cases of “hate crimes”, there are a couple of dozen that are “hate hoaxes”.
     
    Do you have any evidence to support this contention? For someone who roundly criticizes unsupported statements you certainly have an affection for them and an aversion to actual evidence.

    I'll note that earlier in this thread you posted:

    What are those twelve hoaxes?
     
    Nothing like moving the goalposts. That's exactly the kind of thing someone does when they don't have a substantive argument.

    And of course, when Anonymous supplied you with twelve examples (and three examples of documented attacks on Trump supporters) and asked you to find cases to support your point: "Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?"
    all we got was derision. Surely some of those "hundreds" of hate crimes have resulted in evidence that holds up under scrutiny? Especially given how a negligible number of hate crimes against Trump supporters have resulted in substantial video evidence.

    “Do you have any evidence to support this contention? For someone who roundly criticizes unsupported statements you certainly have an affection for them and an aversion to actual evidence.”

    Had you carefully read this thread, I provided the FBI statistics regarding “hate crimes”, and Anonymous (77) provided for those reported “hate hoaxes”.

    This sources shows “[a] picture that emerges isn’t a wave of hoaxes, a wave of attacks on minorities by Trump-emboldened bigots, nor a wave of attacks on Trump supporters by intolerant liberals—though all have occurred—but something more complex and, hopefully, a little less frightening, even if the stories that have happened are still horrible.”

    http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/18/election-hate-crimes-hoaxes-hyperbole

    “Nothing like moving the goalposts. That’s exactly the kind of thing someone does when they don’t have a substantive argument.”

    No goalposts were moved. Anonymous stated, “this is, what, the 12th hoax I’ve read about since the election?).” I merely inquired “What are those 12 hoaxes”? for clarification. He then offered those stories.

    “and asked you to find cases to support your point: “Can you find me stories with substance to them, video proof, that kind of thing?” all we got was derision.”

    The FBI statistics, as well as the keywords “hate crimes against blacks” (without quotes) provides the requisite stories and substance.

    “Especially given how a negligible number of hate crimes against Trump supporters have resulted in substantial video evidence.”

    Assuming that the circumstances involved meets the criteria for “hate crimes”, according to the DA’s. Which, again, “hate crime” is a dubious legal tool.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS