The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Black Share of Known Murder Offenders, 1980-2019
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The federal government has a website for creating custom data sets from the FBI’s official crime stats.

Here’s a helpful graph I generated where the jagged red line represents what percentage of known murder offenders were black from 1980-2019.

The low point for black homicidality relative to nonblacks was 1984, when blacks accounted for 45.2% of known murder offenders. This was a particularly warm moment in white-black relations, the year of Beverly Hills Cop, The Cosby Show, and Prince’s Purple Rain succeeding Michael Jackson’s 1983 Thriller at the top of the pop charts.

In 1984, the powder cocaine wars of c. 1980 were mostly over and the crack cocaine wars had yet to begin.

I saw this kid at my son’s high school do his talent show act in which he did interpretive dances misinterpreting assigned novels from their titles alone, like he assumed that The Grapes of Wrath was about his wine mom and her pretentious drunken friends touring Napa Valley. He put Orwell’s 1984 up on the stand and then acted out his image of 1984 from old MTV videos, which was that 1984 was an exceptionally happy year.

Which it was.

The high point (so far) was 1993 during the Crack Wars, when blacks made up 56.2% of known murder offenders. But 2019 almost topped that with 55.9%. And God knows what 2020 will look like.

The straight pink line is a linear trend line, which rises from 49% black four decades ago to 54% black today.

Here’s another way of looking at the same data, this time emphasizing how, year after year, blacks make up about half of known murder offenders:

 
Hide 225 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. • Agree: Lot, Mr. Grey
    • Replies: @Pericles
    @anon

    Imagine the exhaustion of black bodies as they year after year have to produce half the total while only being 12% of the population.

    , @Polistra
    @anon

    Here's Jared's chart, sonny. It'll help with that little issue of yours.

    https://i.ibb.co/9bHqygp/CRIME-RACE-JARED-T-Murder-600x454.jpg

  2. Anon[130] • Disclaimer says:

    Has any researcher hazarded a guess on the unknown murder offenders? For instance, how many of the victims are blacks living in snitches-get-stitches black neighborhoods? How many were killed in a Sailer’s Law bullet-spray attack? It seems like you could plus-or-minus make a reasonable guess on the race of the killers.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Anon

    The first question asked by old-time Wild West sheriffs upon arriving at a murder scene was, “Did he need killing?”

    I know this is a topic never discussed but what percentage of the “victims” of murder needed killing? I imagine there many scenarios where a serious threat or problem in a crowded, dysfunctional, inner-city environment can only be resolved extrajudicially.

    Relatedly, I think many of petty reasons given for a murder (argued over a TV remote, “he disrespected me”, etc.) are BS cover stories to hide the real reason— which can’t be discussed in an anti-snitch, don’t-put-my-bidness-out-on-da-street culture.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Rooster11

    , @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    , @3g4me
    @Anon

    @2 Anon[130]: Based on the "murderer charged after modern DNA analysis" stories I've seen in the headlines, I'd say it was 9-1 black to White. This fits with my hypothesis that the only blacks over age 12 without a criminal record are those who haven't yet been caught.

    Replies: @Ed Case

  3. The Left certainly will find a way to close this leak where “racist” statistics can be derived that only serve to create prejudice and hate.
    It was meant as sarcasm, but will anyone doubt that it is true?
    Maybe find an AI to check if the desired statistics fit the narrative or not, before it will be created.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @TruthRevolution.net

    You already can't even mention these stats to "progressives" without being accused of racism. We don't have a black problem in this country so much as we have a Democrat problem. But I suppose the real problem is that "conservatives" are too lazy/dumb/cowardly to shut the anti-white left down.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

  4. I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating.

    Anyway, the TV shows me many, many Black people, or people of color. They are all awesome. They are just sweet folks, really great people.

    So I’m not buying any of this blanket criticism that Steve Sailor keeps writing about. He could be a racist for all I know. Which is just awful and wrong.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Just another serf

    And when you do venture out, you have the comfort of knowing that that huge black guy who follows you down a dark alleyway is sure to be a scientist or a neurosurgeon.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Just another serf

    "I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating."

    I had absolutely no idea my wife was posting here!

    , @anonymouseperson
    @Just another serf

    If only blacks in real life were like the way they are shown on Tv, movies and commercials.

  5. What percentage of known murder victims are black? It would be good to compare that to the percent of blacks who are know murder offenders. The percent of murder victims who are black might be a better indicator of how many black murderers there really are, probably more than the 55% of known offenders. Since snitches get stitches in the black “community” it is likely that the known murder offenders under-states the true total of black murders. Since most murders are intra-racial the number of black murder victims will point to the true total of black murders (less the small number of blacks killed by other races).

    • Agree: Morton's toes, theMann
    • Replies: @blomblom
    @rebel yell

    https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/pages/home

    Typically total black murder victims tend to fall 10-15 points below the percentage of black murderers, just like typically total white murder victims tend to be 15-20 points above the rate of white murderers. Probably due to there being more whites in general. When broken down per capita though blacks tend to be disproportionately murderous, disproportionately violent and criminal really, in general.

    And those levels, as mentioned parent article, does not include the number of violent crime where the perps are unknown. If you could break down those unknowns by location, by neighborhood, you could reliably extrapolate the race the perps, and the blacks stats would look even more horrifying.

  6. Anon[130] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    Two reading recommendations:

    1. Freddie deBoer’s blog and Substack newsletter.

    https://freddiedeboer.substack.com

    Freddie is a Marxist who wrote an almost race-realist book on education recently, The Cult of Smart: How Our Broken Education System Perpetuates Social Injustice. He believes that cognitive tests work, that blacks have lower IQs, but that it’s all because of slavery blah blah, and so we have to give them money to compensate them for their bad luck (Paige Harden’s upcoming book may have a similar message).

    Freddie really infuriates the left, so he’s fun to follow. He’s basically IDW at this point, like all the other defenestrated lefties.

    https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/you-arent-actually-mad-at-the-sats

    Trying to fight educational inequality by getting rid of the SAT is like trying to fight climate change by getting rid of thermometers.

    [MORE]

    Why do people have such revulsion towards the SATS? Because they produce unequal results; some students perform better than others on the test. Of course, this is the very function of testing, to reveal underlying inequality, in this case underlying academic aptitude or ability. In fact, the more valid a test is, the more powerful it is, the more inequality it reveals, as it becomes capable of demonstrating finer and finer-grained distinctions between test takers. Most people are bothered by this tendency to reveal inequality because of troublesome and persistent group differences.

    Because Black and white students are not equal in academic preparedness, and because we have failed to close the gap in a half-century of concerted policy effort to do so, we must eliminate the tools that reveal it, such as the SAT. Similarly, the movement to shutter gifted and talented programs4, due to the racial inequalities therein, demonstrates an attempt to shut down those structures that make educational inequality visible. It should go without saying that this will not doing anything to close the gap in actual ability.

    2. Dynomight Blog.

    https://dynomight.net/

    Via Freddie deBoer, Dynomight is a sort of Le Griffe de Lion. He writes about economics, statistics and so on, with a weird fetish about air purification.

    Here’s a post where he read dozens of papers that correlated various traits against the Big 5 personality traits, and he finds that rating higher on all five (where the neuroticism trait is reversed and called emotional stability) means that you just have a better personality. Harvard could probably use this research to show that blacks should get points over Asians in admissions. Here’s a chart Dynomight made:

    https://dynomight.net/img/personalities/vals_nor.svg

    Here he demolishes press reports that the ACT is worthless for college admissions relative to GPA:

    https://dynomight.net/are-tests-irrelevant/

    This is a super detailed Le Griffe-style run-through of a research paper from the University of Chicago with tons of graphs and charts, and a Le Griffe-style mathematical appendix at the end. He shows that the press reports, and the university’s press release, are not supported by the paper:

    https://dynomight.net/are-tests-irrelevant/

    • Thanks: Rob, Ed, Travis, MEH 0910
    • Replies: @Charon
    @Anon


    Trying to fight educational inequality by getting rid of the SAT is like trying to fight climate change by getting rid of thermometers.
     
    Being able to formulate and articulate a pithy analogy like that is a worthy skill. Helps you win arguments right out of the gate, and can reduce your opponents to sputtering, impotent fury.

    This one is especially effective because it leverages a sacred quest (climate change) even though it's sort of irrelevant.

    Ann Coulter is particularly adept at this sort of thing.

  7. Since according to TV commercials blacks are about half the population, isn’t this about right?

    • Agree: Polistra
    • Replies: @Dr. X
    @Redneck farmer

    Half? Based on the commercials I see, blacks must be at least 75% of the population.

    Replies: @profnasty

    , @VivaLaMigra
    @Redneck farmer

    Yeah, the other half are Hispanic. Another half are white lesbians who have Pacific Islander "wives" and multi-racial "children." A fourth half are trannies.

    , @Thirdtwin
    @Redneck farmer

    Blacks are about half of the TV audience, so it makes sense that they are in at least half of the commercials.

  8. Anonymous[348] • Disclaimer says:

    The murder rate was far higher in 1980 than it was in 2020, so I guess whites were over-represented in the “unknown” murder offender category.

    Some food for thought:

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics. Basically, the only two categories that are of any use in crime stats are blacks vs. nonblacks (ie, everybody else).

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Morton's toes

    , @yak-15
    @Anonymous

    What a disingenuous post. Your murder charts stop in 2015 after they begin to uptick.

  9. @Anonymous
    The murder rate was far higher in 1980 than it was in 2020, so I guess whites were over-represented in the "unknown" murder offender category.

    Some food for thought:


    https://atlas.qz.com/i/atlas_E1pEnFs7e.png

    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FT_20.05.05_ImprisonmentRates_1.png

    https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/17dab36/2147483647/resize/640x/quality/85/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.beam.usnews.com%2F1e%2Fec%2F5b9830194ee295b9297232a19a30%2F160929-homicides-graphic.png

    https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/918c309/2147483647/resize/640x/quality/85/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.beam.usnews.com%2Fc0%2F9d%2F02f99d3240a5954bc5c688f0cddc%2F160929-interracialkillings-graphic.png

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @yak-15

    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics. Basically, the only two categories that are of any use in crime stats are blacks vs. nonblacks (ie, everybody else).

    • Disagree: Corvinus
    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Steve Sailer


    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics.
     
    When they commit the crime.

    When José clubs Jamaal, José is white. When Jamaal spray-slays José, suddenly the latter is not so white.

    Let's not even get into "hate crimes"...
    , @Morton's toes
    @Steve Sailer

    One of the most unintentionally hilarious moments in my life: I was at lunch with a bunch of work mates and this Bengali guy explained to us that in Nigeria there was only two peoples-blacks and everybody else. He was dark skinned for a Bengali. And I asked him which one he was (as he had been working there and was sharing all this great information with us.)

    He almost had a stroke. And I felt terrible at the time. This was because I really didn't know the man. After and I had gotten to know him better all of that went away. It was like there was this genius giant concealed in little old me who had temporarily poked its head up to show the limits of the possible.

    % black murderers cannot go above 100. There is a limit to how bad it can get!

    Replies: @Polistra

  10. On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. He specifically named Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Watch the first 20 seconds of the video below.

    That’s the same point that Stanley Kubric made in his 1999 film “Eyes Wide Shut.”

    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything – immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He’s like my dream candidate.

    By the way, on one of his broadcasts, Tucker Carlson mentioned that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. He then mentioned that we should try to figure out *WHICH* intelligence agency Epstein worked for….

    Tucker Carlson is a brave man. He goes where most fear to tread.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @JohnnyWalker123


    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. ... “Eyes Wide Shut.”
     
    Okay, but Tucker's not saying that they are a robed cult of ritual child sacrificers (“Eyes Wide Shut”), but rather that a probable Mossad asset created kompromat on every important public and political figure by using underage prostitutes.

    Which may be worse politically, if somewhat less repulsive morally.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123

    , @gent
    @JohnnyWalker123


    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything – immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He’s like my dream candidate.
     
    I wish you people would stop living in fucking TV land. Fuentes is the exact same thing. We need people who can actually organize a capable resistance, not people who can merely say what we want them to. We already had four years of an entertainer as President, it is clear they, as a vocation, do not have the organization skills required to mount an effective resistance against the permanent government.
    Historically, we're just waiting for Franco. This isn't going to resolve itself electorally.
    , @Truth
    @JohnnyWalker123

    So, a lifetime talking head who has never passed a piece of legislation in his life, and has no allies in congress is your next hope to save the conservatives party (white people)?

    After all, that worked so well from 2016-2020.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  11. @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics. Basically, the only two categories that are of any use in crime stats are blacks vs. nonblacks (ie, everybody else).

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Morton's toes

    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics.

    When they commit the crime.

    When José clubs Jamaal, José is white. When Jamaal spray-slays José, suddenly the latter is not so white.

    Let’s not even get into “hate crimes”…

  12. @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Keep in mind that 93% of Hispanics are included in the white category for crime statistics. Basically, the only two categories that are of any use in crime stats are blacks vs. nonblacks (ie, everybody else).

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Morton's toes

    One of the most unintentionally hilarious moments in my life: I was at lunch with a bunch of work mates and this Bengali guy explained to us that in Nigeria there was only two peoples-blacks and everybody else. He was dark skinned for a Bengali. And I asked him which one he was (as he had been working there and was sharing all this great information with us.)

    He almost had a stroke. And I felt terrible at the time. This was because I really didn’t know the man. After and I had gotten to know him better all of that went away. It was like there was this genius giant concealed in little old me who had temporarily poked its head up to show the limits of the possible.

    % black murderers cannot go above 100. There is a limit to how bad it can get!

    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Polistra
    @Morton's toes

    By and large, the darker people are the more racist they are.

    Another thing our MSM (deliberately) gets wrong.

  13. A comedian on Joe Rogan talked about the rough time he had with some homeless black thugs in Austin. It looks like the “well behaved” white liberal yuppies are brining destruction to yet another city. White Flight continues as long as anti-White policies are in effect.

    • Replies: @FPD72
    @RichardTaylor

    Austin voters just passed a referendum that reestablished a camping ban on city property. Of course, the enforcement of the ban will depend on the far-left district attorney and city courts. Governor Abbot is threatening to get the Texas Department of Public Safety involved if the city and county don’t act.

    Austin is not experiencing white flight. The black percentage of residents has actually been declining for the past ten years.

    , @Tex
    @RichardTaylor

    In my experience, the issue with the homeless in Austin is less about race than general mental problems. A lot of the vagrants are psychotic. Another bunch are whacked out on drugs. There are shantytowns in various directions a few blocks from my work. Encountering a psychotic vagrant acting aggressively is pretty common. It's sort of like running across a grenade with the pin 3/4 of the way out. Fool with it and it may go off. Leave it along and it may go off too.

    Move north a few blocks to the Capitol area, and it's quite different. DPS is much more present and effective. The building I work in has police as well as civilian security, but there's only so much area they can cover.

    Not to say that thug vagrants are not a problem, but I make an effort to limit my exposure to downtown Austin so I may not see their patterns as much. There was a rather droll fellow (a big black dude) in a nearby park that would hold forth to the other vagrants on the Jewish Question.

    Best recent overheard vagrant comment, from an old black woman on the steps of the Dickenson House, "I wasn't born in China. I wasn't born in Africa. I wasn't born in America. I was born in Philadelphia!"

  14. Here’s another way of looking at the same data…

    And displaying it. That certainly is an interesting shade put to use in that graph.

  15. @anon
    https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/racist1.gif

    Replies: @Pericles, @Polistra

    Imagine the exhaustion of black bodies as they year after year have to produce half the total while only being 12% of the population.

    • LOL: Clyde, Swamp Fox
  16. @Morton's toes
    @Steve Sailer

    One of the most unintentionally hilarious moments in my life: I was at lunch with a bunch of work mates and this Bengali guy explained to us that in Nigeria there was only two peoples-blacks and everybody else. He was dark skinned for a Bengali. And I asked him which one he was (as he had been working there and was sharing all this great information with us.)

    He almost had a stroke. And I felt terrible at the time. This was because I really didn't know the man. After and I had gotten to know him better all of that went away. It was like there was this genius giant concealed in little old me who had temporarily poked its head up to show the limits of the possible.

    % black murderers cannot go above 100. There is a limit to how bad it can get!

    Replies: @Polistra

    By and large, the darker people are the more racist they are.

    Another thing our MSM (deliberately) gets wrong.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  17. @anon
    https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/racist1.gif

    Replies: @Pericles, @Polistra

    Here’s Jared’s chart, sonny. It’ll help with that little issue of yours.

  18. To even mention such facts is now deemed racist. People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Mr. Anon

    Libs try to explain away 13/50 at Quora -->>>
    Is the 13/50 statistic real, or is it a result of racism in the justice system?
    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-13-50-statistic-real-or-is-it-a-result-of-racism-in-the-justice-system

    Replies: @David In TN, @Jack D

    , @Polistra
    @Mr. Anon


    People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.
     
    I shut 'em down by telling them that 13/50 is way wrong: it's actually more like 4/52.

    4 being the males between 14 and 40; 52 being the actual amount of violent crime.

    If they still object, I point out that the 52 is way low, because of poor reporting.

    Just can't tell you how popular I am on social media! And I love it.

    Replies: @Hans

  19. Hey Steve, if you’re interested I’d very much like to hear your take/parsing of the Biden Admin’s plan to start cutting checks to families and other pro-natalist policies. Seems hardly coincidental that this is only happening after the demographic tipping point has been reached, but I haven’t seen anyone make any hay of it.

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @AnonymousNameChange

    I’d very much like to hear your take/parsing of the Biden Admin’s plan to start cutting checks to families and other pro-natalist policies.

    I don't think the purpose is a pro-natalist policy. I think it's a pro-not-losing-the-House-in-the-midterms policy. Joe is pumping out Biden Bucks to buy votes and keep the economy going until his policies have their inevitable consequences.

  20. “The high point (so far) was 1993 during the Crack Wars, when blacks made up 56.2% of known murder offenders.”

    If you’re going to implore pop culture has a correlation (which I agree with) then 1993 was in the wake of the ghetto violence glamorization wave of New Jack City, Boys in the Hood, Dr. Dre’s The Chronic, White Men Can’t Jump, and the Saint Rodney not guilty verdicts. All preceded the 1993 known offender spike.

    And these are just known offenders, which make up what… at most maybe 35% of total homicides? Less? Meaning the 65% of homicides never have a conviction. If they did what would the black % be? 80%? I think that’s realistic.

    • Agree: HammerJack, profnasty
  21. The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.

    • Replies: @West reanimator
    @Clyde


    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.
     
    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.

    "Law and order" Reagan granted amnesty to millions of border jumpers.

    Replies: @Clyde

  22. @Mr. Anon
    To even mention such facts is now deemed racist. People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.

    Replies: @Clyde, @Polistra

    Libs try to explain away 13/50 at Quora –>>>
    Is the 13/50 statistic real, or is it a result of racism in the justice system?
    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-13-50-statistic-real-or-is-it-a-result-of-racism-in-the-justice-system

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Clyde

    Per Quora, "liberals" never run out of excuses and rationalizations for black criminality. As Lawrence Auster wrote, when all else fails just blame it on white people.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    , @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

  23. homicidality

    Murderousness is a good English word.

  24. Aren’t negroes also decreasing as a share of the total population? That implies they’re getting worse.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @gent

    I will have to find a year by year share of population table, ideally by age.

    Replies: @res

    , @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @gent

    The Black population has been growing for decades. Back in 1990 there were 30 million Blacks, which was 12% of the US population. Today we have 44 million Blacks which is 13% of the population. Among the under 30 population Blacks are 14% of the population today , higher than 1990.

    The US Black population has grown 50% since 1990 while the white population grew just 4%. Not sure why people think the Black population is declining. It is the white population which is declining.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    , @Almost Missouri
    @gent

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It's probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    Replies: @Anon, @Travis, @res, @peterike

  25. The trend is clearly not our friend. Given the scale, this is far more worrisome than AGW.

  26. @Mr. Anon
    To even mention such facts is now deemed racist. People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.

    Replies: @Clyde, @Polistra

    People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.

    I shut ’em down by telling them that 13/50 is way wrong: it’s actually more like 4/52.

    4 being the males between 14 and 40; 52 being the actual amount of violent crime.

    If they still object, I point out that the 52 is way low, because of poor reporting.

    Just can’t tell you how popular I am on social media! And I love it.

    • Replies: @Hans
    @Polistra

    I'd bump dat 40 up to 45 and flex on the 14, too. I likes 4.5% cuz some of them 12 and 55 y.o.s still be da man.

  27. @gent
    Aren't negroes also decreasing as a share of the total population? That implies they're getting worse.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco, @Almost Missouri

    I will have to find a year by year share of population table, ideally by age.

    • Replies: @res
    @Steve Sailer

    This document is a good start for 1960-1997.
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/pop6097.pdf
    Unfortunately the data is in inconvenient tables and would take some work to extract.

    This 1900-1959 data only has whites and "all other", but still might be useful.
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/pop0059.pdf

    2000 census
    https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2000/dec/phc-t-09.html

    They have a variety of data in Excel/PDF/TXT. Table 1 looks like the one you want.
    http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/2000/phc/phc-t-09/tab01.pdf

    Annual estimates 2010-2019
    https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2020/population-estimates-detailed.html

  28. Could lower big-city law enforcement effectiveness also explain the mid-80’s dip–they weren’t able to identify & convict as many perps?

  29. @Redneck farmer
    Since according to TV commercials blacks are about half the population, isn't this about right?

    Replies: @Dr. X, @VivaLaMigra, @Thirdtwin

    Half? Based on the commercials I see, blacks must be at least 75% of the population.

    • Replies: @profnasty
    @Dr. X

    Blacks are being primed for a guerilla war against Whites. It's dry tinder now. All the 'Usual Suspects' have to do is add gasoline and a match.
    And don't forget, the US Military is now Black.
    [Support your local Sheriff.]

  30. @Polistra
    @Mr. Anon


    People who just post 13/50 get shut down on social media.
     
    I shut 'em down by telling them that 13/50 is way wrong: it's actually more like 4/52.

    4 being the males between 14 and 40; 52 being the actual amount of violent crime.

    If they still object, I point out that the 52 is way low, because of poor reporting.

    Just can't tell you how popular I am on social media! And I love it.

    Replies: @Hans

    I’d bump dat 40 up to 45 and flex on the 14, too. I likes 4.5% cuz some of them 12 and 55 y.o.s still be da man.

  31. Anon[399] • Disclaimer says:

    When you factor in the unsolved murders, the percentage likely jumps to over 60%. It turns out that over 70% of unsolved murder victims are black. And since the vast majority of blacks are killed by other blacks, we can infer that most unsolved black murderers are also black. From the Washington Post:

    “In the past decade, police in 52 of the nation’s largest cities have failed to make an arrest in nearly 26,000 killings, according to a Washington Post analysis of homicide arrest data. In more than 18,600 of those cases, the victim, like Jackman, was black.

    Black victims, who accounted for the majority of homicides, were the least likely of any racial group to have their killings result in an arrest, The Post found. While police arrested someone in 63 percent of the killings of white victims, they did so in just 47 percent of those with black victims.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/investigations/black-homicides-arrests/

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anon


    When you factor in the unsolved murders, the percentage likely jumps to over 60%. It turns out that over 70% of unsolved murder victims are black.
     
    So 13/50 is inaccurate, and it’s more like 4/60?
  32. White victims of black crime had best keep their mouths shut. Their own families, employers and community will turn against them if they don’t.

    My liberal extended family reacted angrily when I began to relate to them the story of how black gangs constantly threatened, attacked and finally drove my family out of Brooklyn during the crack epidemic. They just wanted me to shut up about it. Soon, they were calling me a bigot. My relationship with my sisters collapsed over this.

    A special ed teacher friend of mine was attacked and severely beaten in her classroom by a black kid. The school board and the teacher’s union turned against her and denounced her as a racist for seeking compensation and redress. They accused her of provoking the attack. She did win a lawsuit against the school district but has been blacklisted out of the teaching profession.

    One of the reasons you don’t hear much about white victims of black violence is that those victims learn to keep their mouths shut.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Shouting Thomas

    The majority of people who are injured at work are fired because the employer’s Wcom insurance company has to pay for medical care and lost wages, sometimes permanent disability.

    It’s illegal to fire someone because of a Wcom claim. But it usually happens.

    What happened to the teacher is standard procedure. It’s the injured worker’s attorney against the employer and the Wcom insurance company’s attorneys and endless hearings depositions and testimony before medical treatment is authorized.. And the injured worker is usually fired, harassed until he or she leaves and is blacklisted.

  33. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    Has any researcher hazarded a guess on the unknown murder offenders? For instance, how many of the victims are blacks living in snitches-get-stitches black neighborhoods? How many were killed in a Sailer's Law bullet-spray attack? It seems like you could plus-or-minus make a reasonable guess on the race of the killers.

    Replies: @Anon, @Almost Missouri, @3g4me

    The first question asked by old-time Wild West sheriffs upon arriving at a murder scene was, “Did he need killing?”

    I know this is a topic never discussed but what percentage of the “victims” of murder needed killing? I imagine there many scenarios where a serious threat or problem in a crowded, dysfunctional, inner-city environment can only be resolved extrajudicially.

    Relatedly, I think many of petty reasons given for a murder (argued over a TV remote, “he disrespected me”, etc.) are BS cover stories to hide the real reason— which can’t be discussed in an anti-snitch, don’t-put-my-bidness-out-on-da-street culture.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Anon

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home 'hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don't charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It's like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    Replies: @John Up North, @Morton's toes, @gutta percha, @Desiderius

    , @Rooster11
    @Anon

    I think you’re onto something. People always bemoan the unsolved homicide cases, but in respect to the inner cities, many of the police departments/homicide detectives know who the bad actors are. Unless there’s some egregious evidence they simply cannot ignore, I’m sure they chalk quite a few murders up to “cost of doing business” for the feral thugs. Anyways, in a majority black area, there’s always more than enough crime and other cases that they can focus their energy on like solving the random shootings of children. Why throw good money after bad, on guys no one cares are dead.

  34. OT

    Billy the Kid has been, all the time, a naughty lecher. Who would have thought ….

    https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-image-likable-nerdy-philanthropist-fell-apart-2021-5

    Bill Gates crafted a public image as a likable, nerdy do-gooder. Office affairs, ‘uncomfortable’ workplace behavior, and Epstein ties reveal cracks in his facade.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Gates is starting to look like Warren Buffet, who has carefully cultivated his, "aw shucks, I just like to sit at home and watch football in Omaha," image for many, many years.

    Meanwhile, he owns fucking NetJets and can go anywhere he wants at a moment's notice. Good for him.

    Don't be fooled. As soon as Warren bought my father's company, he hatcheted the retirement program and health insurance to the maximum. He is a psychopath, like many people at that level. That is why they are at that level, and you do not want to be one of them.

    Bill Gates is a creep who had family connections at IBM, which allowed him to meet there and -- oh yes, to his "credit" -- do a deal that allowed his little, pissant, Microsoft company to keep rights to the software that ran the IBM PC. The rest is history. Gates is not a genius, he is yet another in a long line of psychopathic monopolists.

    I realize Steve Sailer was taught in UCLA MBA school (LOL) that it is the GOAL of a business to become a monopoly. Well, that's just fine. If it is a goal, then of the rest of us have the perfect right and responsibility toi eliminate and destroy, by any means necessary, MONOPOLIES. To hell with them, God damn them, and THINK FOR YOURSELF.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @jon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Gates downfall seems very coordinated. It kind of reminds me of Weinstein. You have a rich, powerful person who is able to put forth this false, crafted image of who they are, seemingly forever. Then it all very suddenly comes crashing down, and the shit bag is revealed. And when it is, we find out that everyone around the person knew all of the dirt the whole time, but nobody ever said anything.
    These don't feel organic; the idea that one person coming forward, or one part of the story coming out releases the flood gates. It feels a lot more like these people being burned by the other shit bags, their protection suddenly being removed. I wonder what Gates did to get kicked out of the club?

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Ed

  35. The only way to correct this type of institutional racism is to send all their children to the Ivy League, then they’ll all come out doctors, lawyers, management consultants, investment bankers and academics, instead of continuing with the cycle of poverty and crime. It’s time to make the Ivy League 100% black, and I don’t mean Nigerians or Ghanaians, these elite insitutions must be strictly for black children of fathers who have been incarcerated. It’s the only reparation acceptable for centuries of institutional racism.

    • Replies: @Truth
    @anon

    Don't be jealous because you didn't get in, bro. I'm sure your Associates degree in Hotel and Restaurant Management from Kansas City Trade Tech was an excellent investment.

    , @Rob McX
    @anon


    The only way to correct this type of institutional racism is to send all their children to the Ivy League, then they’ll all come out doctors, lawyers, management consultants, investment bankers and academics...
     
    I thought they were already. Looks like TV is lagging behind real life by a decade or two.
  36. Watch a few dozen episodes of the popular A&E reality show First 48. Overwhelming majority of the murders are committed by blacks against blacks. Motives: robberies, disrespect, eliminating witnesses. Rarely a crime of passion. I’m shocked the show is still on the air.

    • Replies: @donut
    @Dan Smith

    A couple of the cities where they filmed canceled their contracts with the show because of that issue .

    , @Ed
    @Dan Smith

    The show remains on air but the cities willing to work with the show have dwindled. That’s why they’re reduced to cities such as Tulsa and Mobile. Black cities like Detroit and Memphis have cancelled cooperation with production due to image issues.

    Still funny how Live PD was cancelled during the George Floyd hysteria. There’s a movement to bring it back but it’s unlikely.

  37. @gent
    Aren't negroes also decreasing as a share of the total population? That implies they're getting worse.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco, @Almost Missouri

    The Black population has been growing for decades. Back in 1990 there were 30 million Blacks, which was 12% of the US population. Today we have 44 million Blacks which is 13% of the population. Among the under 30 population Blacks are 14% of the population today , higher than 1990.

    The US Black population has grown 50% since 1990 while the white population grew just 4%. Not sure why people think the Black population is declining. It is the white population which is declining.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Shows like that have been around for a long time, but they often tried to feature a disproportionately high number of white killers. A lot of people probably prefer watching shows about whites anyway, because murders by blacks are so monotonously stupid and depressing.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @Feryl

  38. @gent
    Aren't negroes also decreasing as a share of the total population? That implies they're getting worse.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco, @Almost Missouri

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It’s probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    • Thanks: HammerJack
    • Troll: JohnPlywood
    • Replies: @Anon
    @Almost Missouri

    You're a fucking retard.


    That's stagnation-tier and the 2% per 5 decades increase is due to immigration from Africa. Actual legacy blacks are indeed declining in number and everyone can palpably feel that, hence why you keep getting angry at everyone for being smarter than you.

    , @Travis
    @Almost Missouri

    exactly....and if you examine the population under the age of 30 (which commits most of the crime) we see that Blacks are currently 14% of the population , up from 12% of this population back in 1990.

    Blacks have had higher fertility rates than whites for the past 100+ years. Black fertility was above 3 during the Seventies and Eighties when White fertility was below 2. Today as white fertility remains below 1.8 Black fertility is still above 2.

    The data is out there , easy to find birth data by race of mother.
    https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/6038-total-births-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/1729,573,133,16,11,6/2,1,4,13/12703,12704

    year -White births - Black births
    1995- 2,382,000 - 587,000
    2005- 2,279,000 - 584,000
    2015 - 2,130,000 - 589,000
    2019 - 1,954,000 - 577,000

    Births to White mothers is down 20% since 1995 while Births to Black mothers is down 1%. But White mothers can and do have Black babies, while none of the Black mothers can have a white baby. About 5% of the White births will have Black fathers, thus producing a Black child. While 1% of the Black Births will have a white Father their babies will all be Black. So the above statistics are under-counting Black babies and over-counting White babies.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @res
    @Almost Missouri

    It's good to see that JohnPlywood has joined Corvinus in offering his seal of approval (Disagree or Troll flag) to good comments.

    Thanks, John. It makes those good comments easier to find.

    Replies: @Alfa158, @Corvinus

    , @peterike
    @Almost Missouri


    the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930

     

    Indeed. The only reason the percentage of blacks stays kind of the same is that we're flooding the nation with even more non-black people of color. But the percentage of the black population is nearly meaningless compared to the TOTAL number of blacks.

    The United States has a finite amount of space. The available living space now contains more blacks than ever before. And that's why it feels like there are a lot more blacks around where there didn't used to be 10 or 20 years ago. Because there's LOTS and LOTS more of them. And various government actions are spreading them around. They have to go someplace. And the place they're going to is a nice white neighborhood near you.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

  39. In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races

    https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezashr/asp/vic_display.asp

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Elli


    In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races
     
    What is the significance of that?

    Replies: @jon, @Brandt

  40. @Anon
    Has any researcher hazarded a guess on the unknown murder offenders? For instance, how many of the victims are blacks living in snitches-get-stitches black neighborhoods? How many were killed in a Sailer's Law bullet-spray attack? It seems like you could plus-or-minus make a reasonable guess on the race of the killers.

    Replies: @Anon, @Almost Missouri, @3g4me

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders (“snitches get stitches”) tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like “13% does 60% or 70%.”

    As I’ve been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    • Agree: Wade Hampton
    • Troll: JohnPlywood
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Almost Missouri

    Literally everything you wrote here is factually incorrect.

    Replies: @res

    , @Triteleia Laxa
    @Almost Missouri


    As I’ve been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.
     
    While I quibble with "most", it seems probable that unsolved problems will tend to be in areas which you can't speak freely on, as speaking freely is important in designing working solutions.

    Try fixing a car with a broken gear box without being able to studyt gear boxes, talk to people about them, or even use the words "gear" and "box"
    , @JohnPlywood
    @Almost Missouri

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders, you stupid fuck, and stranger murders are more likely to be interracial (logically), but interracial murders aren't significantly more likely to be stranger murders.


    Imagine being as low-IQ and hysterical as this fucking cuck, "almost missouri".

    Replies: @rebel yell, @Whiskey, @Mike Tre

    , @Bucky
    @Almost Missouri

    Also there is a tendency among blacks to attack in packs. Such as in here:

    https://vidmax.com/video/204460-uber-driver-goes-to-bar-for-a-pickup-in-morgantown-virginia-gets-swarmed-and-beaten-by-a-mob

    , @res
    @Almost Missouri


    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders (“snitches get stitches”) tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like “13% does 60% or 70%.”
     
    I used to think that, but my back of the envelope calculations indicate it is probably not true. See this comment for calculation.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/how-much-more-homicidal-are-blacks-than-whites-7-4x-more-like-the-obama-administration-said-or-11-7x-more/#comment-3946871

    The nonintuitive result seems to come from the larger number of whites murdered resulting in more uncleared white murders (even with a higher clearance rate) which are (in theory) disproportionately intra-racial.

    Your point that uncleared murders are more likely to be inter-racial than cleared murders is a good one though, but it would be hard to find data to check that.

    In any case, I think the population disparities as well as the presence of Hispanics in the numbers make your 70% speculation unlikely.

    All of that said, there is a depressing amount of truth in your final paragraph.
    , @ScarletNumber
    @Almost Missouri


    black murders (“snitches get stitches”) tend to go unsolved more often
     
    Not only that, they tend to look alike, so much so that facial recognition software is having a tough time. 60 Minutes had a piece on it a few weeks ago, of course featuring some black guys who were arrested and legitimately dindu nuffin.
  41. @Anon
    OT

    Two reading recommendations:

    1. Freddie deBoer's blog and Substack newsletter.

    https://freddiedeboer.substack.com

    Freddie is a Marxist who wrote an almost race-realist book on education recently, The Cult of Smart: How Our Broken Education System Perpetuates Social Injustice. He believes that cognitive tests work, that blacks have lower IQs, but that it's all because of slavery blah blah, and so we have to give them money to compensate them for their bad luck (Paige Harden's upcoming book may have a similar message).

    Freddie really infuriates the left, so he's fun to follow. He's basically IDW at this point, like all the other defenestrated lefties.

    https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/you-arent-actually-mad-at-the-sats

    Trying to fight educational inequality by getting rid of the SAT is like trying to fight climate change by getting rid of thermometers.
     

    Why do people have such revulsion towards the SATS? Because they produce unequal results; some students perform better than others on the test. Of course, this is the very function of testing, to reveal underlying inequality, in this case underlying academic aptitude or ability. In fact, the more valid a test is, the more powerful it is, the more inequality it reveals, as it becomes capable of demonstrating finer and finer-grained distinctions between test takers. Most people are bothered by this tendency to reveal inequality because of troublesome and persistent group differences.
     

    Because Black and white students are not equal in academic preparedness, and because we have failed to close the gap in a half-century of concerted policy effort to do so, we must eliminate the tools that reveal it, such as the SAT. Similarly, the movement to shutter gifted and talented programs4, due to the racial inequalities therein, demonstrates an attempt to shut down those structures that make educational inequality visible. It should go without saying that this will not doing anything to close the gap in actual ability.
     
    2. Dynomight Blog.

    https://dynomight.net/

    Via Freddie deBoer, Dynomight is a sort of Le Griffe de Lion. He writes about economics, statistics and so on, with a weird fetish about air purification.

    Here's a post where he read dozens of papers that correlated various traits against the Big 5 personality traits, and he finds that rating higher on all five (where the neuroticism trait is reversed and called emotional stability) means that you just have a better personality. Harvard could probably use this research to show that blacks should get points over Asians in admissions. Here's a chart Dynomight made:

    https://dynomight.net/img/personalities/vals_nor.svg

    Here he demolishes press reports that the ACT is worthless for college admissions relative to GPA:

    https://dynomight.net/are-tests-irrelevant/

    This is a super detailed Le Griffe-style run-through of a research paper from the University of Chicago with tons of graphs and charts, and a Le Griffe-style mathematical appendix at the end. He shows that the press reports, and the university's press release, are not supported by the paper:

    https://dynomight.net/are-tests-irrelevant/

    Replies: @Charon

    Trying to fight educational inequality by getting rid of the SAT is like trying to fight climate change by getting rid of thermometers.

    Being able to formulate and articulate a pithy analogy like that is a worthy skill. Helps you win arguments right out of the gate, and can reduce your opponents to sputtering, impotent fury.

    This one is especially effective because it leverages a sacred quest (climate change) even though it’s sort of irrelevant.

    Ann Coulter is particularly adept at this sort of thing.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  42. Anonymous[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    Literally everything you wrote here is factually incorrect.

    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous

    Comments like that are much better if you actually offer support for your point.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood

  43. @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    As I’ve been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    While I quibble with “most”, it seems probable that unsolved problems will tend to be in areas which you can’t speak freely on, as speaking freely is important in designing working solutions.

    Try fixing a car with a broken gear box without being able to studyt gear boxes, talk to people about them, or even use the words “gear” and “box”

  44. @JohnnyWalker123
    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. He specifically named Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Watch the first 20 seconds of the video below.

    https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1394452371279863808

    That's the same point that Stanley Kubric made in his 1999 film "Eyes Wide Shut."

    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything - immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He's like my dream candidate.

    By the way, on one of his broadcasts, Tucker Carlson mentioned that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. He then mentioned that we should try to figure out *WHICH* intelligence agency Epstein worked for....

    Tucker Carlson is a brave man. He goes where most fear to tread.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @gent, @Truth

    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. … “Eyes Wide Shut.”

    Okay, but Tucker’s not saying that they are a robed cult of ritual child sacrificers (“Eyes Wide Shut”), but rather that a probable Mossad asset created kompromat on every important public and political figure by using underage prostitutes.

    Which may be worse politically, if somewhat less repulsive morally.

    • Troll: JohnPlywood
    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    @Almost Missouri


    Mossad asset created kompromat on every important public and political figure by using underage prostitutes.
     
    Mostly this, but check this out. Epstein seems to have had a bizarre obsession with the Occult.

    https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/jeffrey-epstein-the-true-ugly-face-of-the-occult-elite/

    Remember that Temple he had on his island?

    https://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/5d2657e421a861065b48d8e8-1920-960-e1563837723597.jpg

    That is weirder than anything in EWS.

    So is the bizarre fascination that our elites have with Marina Abramovich. Why would so many of them hang out with her? Why would the Rothschilds?

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/dd/cb/72/ddcb726351406cf81f91ff48c75724d1.jpg

    Why would Microsoft use her in an ad?

    https://twitter.com/joslyne_raquel/status/1249497970900226051

  45. @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders, you stupid fuck, and stranger murders are more likely to be interracial (logically), but interracial murders aren’t significantly more likely to be stranger murders.

    Imagine being as low-IQ and hysterical as this fucking cuck, “almost missouri”.

    • LOL: Truth, ic1000
    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @rebel yell
    @JohnPlywood


    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders
     
    No, unsolved murders are not more likely to involve white offenders. In raw numbers, unsolved murders will likely follow at least the averages of solved murders, so at least 55% of unsolved murders will have black offenders.
    The real question is whether unsolved murders with black victims are a higher percentage of unsolved murders than solved murders with black victims are of solved murders. If so, that would indicate that more than 55% of unsolved murders have black offenders, and that black offenders commit more, perhaps much more, than 55% of all murders.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @JohnPlywood

    , @Whiskey
    @JohnPlywood

    The sad thing is that you really seem to believe that "Murder She Wrote" and "Columbo" were documentaries. A blind, willful denial of reality does not reflect well upon you.

    Whites murder a lot less than every other race than Asians. This is born out in study after study, including Heather McDonald's analysis of the NYPD murder and shooting investigations which were very detailed. Indeed Whites are known for being far more reluctant to kill than blacks. SLA Marshall's study which has been verified by John Keegan shows that in WWII, most soldiers were reluctant to fire so ingrained were the taboos against killing. Similar results were shown in Vietnam, Korea, etc. A small minority of the men did the bulk of the firing and killing. Better and more realistic training and deployment (with those they trained with) after Vietnam resulted in more lethality in the Gulf War, Iraq War and Afghanistan though the latter two were different than WWII.

    Whites are older, more middle class, and upper class than blacks. That alone makes them less likely to kill. But there is a deeper reason -- eugenics. For the past 2000 years plus, every king, emperor, bishop-elector, prince, lord, and the like has been busy executing thieves, murderers, cut-throats, bandits, pirates and the like of every description. More in some places, less in others, but all across Europe. First such men were direct threats to the ruler, given the tendency of bandit leaders to gather dissatisfied men at arms. Second, they victimized peasants. A dead peasant would not pay taxes, and if he had not fathered children, neither would his non existent heirs. Nor would he give service. And taxes could not be collected from a peasant robbed and left with nothing. Lords who left their peasants to the mercies of the bandits could be replaced by a lord above them wanting labor or military levies and finding ... only graveyards. For blacks it is the reverse, their entire environment has been towards keeping it real.

    Next is the type of murder that is "unsolved." While contract murders may leave no direct physical evidence pointing to the one hiring, and they do happen rarely, like tornadoes in Salt Lake City, police generally have well established suspicions: family members, business partners, etc. and someone generally talks. These are also quite rare -- the type of person who thinks its a smart idea to kill a family member or business partner tends not to last long in middle and upper class society. Those who do are the very limited number of organized crime figures like Gotti or Whitey Bulger, generally protected by various organizations (the mob, the FBI for Bulger). Others tend to get caught sooner or later (generally sooner) and are quite rare.

    What is not rare is the type of murder commited by blacks that is unsolved. Jill Leovy went over this in Ghettocide. A car rolls up, shots are fired (almost always from a revolver). A person is dead, no witness will testify (for fear of gang retaliation and they are tied to the neighborhood). There are generally few if any working street cameras. No license plate, no description, no physical evidence save a deformed bullet. The gun is generally immediately traded away to another gang for money/drugs etc. No brass on the floor of the car as its a revolver. Much the same can happen and has happened in real life shootings of ordinary black men and women in the ghetto who were not gang members. Merely targets in the neighborhood.

    THAT is the type of crime that does not happen every five years in the entire country, but every day in black ghettos. There is basically no evidence for police to process. No witnesses (none that will testify or even inform). Drug cases are used to proxy prosecute likely murderers. Its not exact. Very many murderers get off -- clearance rates of homicides in Detroit is below 50%, as it is in Baltimore, Chicago, and most of South-Central Los Angeles (the rest of the city WAS higher before BLM). Clearance as in there was a suspect charged, not even conviction. Even if charges are dropped later, it still counts as cleared. Not even 50% of black murderers get charged by act (likely most black murderers charged have multiple counts never charged).

    Given the abysmal clearance rates of homicides in most black cities, I would put the rate of homicides committed by black people at about 80-85%. Its that bad.

    Again, I'm not shocked you believe in fantasy and don't want to face the facts of race, violence and crime. Most people don't and want pretty lies about ass kicking babes, wise black women, and the like.

    , @Mike Tre
    @JohnPlywood

    Imagine being a Hindu full of envy and sexually attracted to negro violence. Oh wait, you don't have to because you already are.

  46. @TruthRevolution.net
    The Left certainly will find a way to close this leak where "racist" statistics can be derived that only serve to create prejudice and hate.
    It was meant as sarcasm, but will anyone doubt that it is true?
    Maybe find an AI to check if the desired statistics fit the narrative or not, before it will be created.

    Replies: @AndrewR

    You already can’t even mention these stats to “progressives” without being accused of racism. We don’t have a black problem in this country so much as we have a Democrat problem. But I suppose the real problem is that “conservatives” are too lazy/dumb/cowardly to shut the anti-white left down.

    • Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @AndrewR

    Good point. The majority of whites , Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Communists and independents are afraid and fear being cancelled and are not willing to speak-out because they will lose their jobs , friends and family.

    Plus there are not any viable political solutions. Most whites are not effected by Black violence. Most whites live in white neighborhoods and spend extra money on housing to keep their children away from Blacks.

  47. Tex says:

    OT, since Mak da Knife, the gentlest stabber, her fifteen minutes of fame are up. Here’s noted firearms Youtuber Paul Harrell examining whether shooting the knife out of an attacker’s hand is realistic. In addition to questions of accuracy, Harrell delves into bullet penetration.

    Sorry, I’m still iffy on embedding videos.

    I came to the conclusion that Paul Harrell is an excellent marksman.

    • Replies: @prosa123
    @Tex

    Not only is Paul Harrell an excellent marksman, but unlike other firearms fans who merely boast about how they're totally able and ready to shoot criminals in self-defense, he actually did it.

  48. gent says:
    @JohnnyWalker123
    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. He specifically named Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Watch the first 20 seconds of the video below.

    https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1394452371279863808

    That's the same point that Stanley Kubric made in his 1999 film "Eyes Wide Shut."

    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything - immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He's like my dream candidate.

    By the way, on one of his broadcasts, Tucker Carlson mentioned that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. He then mentioned that we should try to figure out *WHICH* intelligence agency Epstein worked for....

    Tucker Carlson is a brave man. He goes where most fear to tread.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @gent, @Truth

    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything – immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He’s like my dream candidate.

    I wish you people would stop living in fucking TV land. Fuentes is the exact same thing. We need people who can actually organize a capable resistance, not people who can merely say what we want them to. We already had four years of an entertainer as President, it is clear they, as a vocation, do not have the organization skills required to mount an effective resistance against the permanent government.
    Historically, we’re just waiting for Franco. This isn’t going to resolve itself electorally.

  49. Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:

    What percentage of offenders are black males, particularly? And what percentage are black males of a specific age range?

  50. @Clyde
    @Mr. Anon

    Libs try to explain away 13/50 at Quora -->>>
    Is the 13/50 statistic real, or is it a result of racism in the justice system?
    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-13-50-statistic-real-or-is-it-a-result-of-racism-in-the-justice-system

    Replies: @David In TN, @Jack D

    Per Quora, “liberals” never run out of excuses and rationalizations for black criminality. As Lawrence Auster wrote, when all else fails just blame it on white people.

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @David In TN

    As Lawrence Auster wrote, when all else fails just blame it on white people.

    Things have only gotten worse since Auster left the scene. It's no longer "when all else fails," but simply "always blame white people."

  51. @Redneck farmer
    Since according to TV commercials blacks are about half the population, isn't this about right?

    Replies: @Dr. X, @VivaLaMigra, @Thirdtwin

    Yeah, the other half are Hispanic. Another half are white lesbians who have Pacific Islander “wives” and multi-racial “children.” A fourth half are trannies.

  52. @Just another serf
    I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating.

    Anyway, the TV shows me many, many Black people, or people of color. They are all awesome. They are just sweet folks, really great people.

    So I’m not buying any of this blanket criticism that Steve Sailor keeps writing about. He could be a racist for all I know. Which is just awful and wrong.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @YetAnotherAnon, @anonymouseperson

    And when you do venture out, you have the comfort of knowing that that huge black guy who follows you down a dark alleyway is sure to be a scientist or a neurosurgeon.

    • LOL: Thomasina
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Rob McX


    And when you do venture out, you have the comfort of knowing that that huge black guy who follows you down a dark alleyway is sure to be a scientist or a neurosurgeon.

     

    Or the best burger griller in the land.
  53. @Clyde
    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.

    Replies: @West reanimator

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.

    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.

    “Law and order” Reagan granted amnesty to millions of border jumpers.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @West reanimator

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.


    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.
     
    Of course I saw this about Reagan's second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today. Look at the graph again (w all due respect)
    Translation-- "You don't know what you got 'till its gone" -- Joni Mitchell
    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone! This is how the ChiComs can be moving in today to neutralize us and prevail. And I saw this all happen. Patrick Buchanan warned us starting in 1988!

    If you are young and want a South African situation, then you are getting it and our blacks never even mined gold and diamonds for our elites that trickled down some to the South African white plebs. Just some effin southern states cotton. Picked and processed by our now useless blacks. Cotton that was mostly shipped to Great Britain where when woven into textiles would have 500% value added to it. 500% is my guess-timate

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @silviosilver

  54. @Clyde
    @Mr. Anon

    Libs try to explain away 13/50 at Quora -->>>
    Is the 13/50 statistic real, or is it a result of racism in the justice system?
    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-13-50-statistic-real-or-is-it-a-result-of-racism-in-the-justice-system

    Replies: @David In TN, @Jack D

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.

    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It’s more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn’t this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies – social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely – they’re just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole “village” is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    • Agree: Buzz Mohawk
    • Replies: @gent
    @Jack D

    Single motherhood is strongly incentivized by government programs.

    , @Zoos
    @Jack D


    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole “village” is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.
     
    "It takes a village" is a VERY middle-class conceit. Poor people won't conform. Their social skills preclude the sense of propriety on either side. That is, if you tell the neighbor's kid what to do, you could end up shot in the head.

    Rich folks don't even see the kids next door, much less give a shit, and their nannies won't care about neighborhood kids unless they're paid.

    That leaves the middle-class, which DID function well under that conceit, until Section 8 housing and illegal immigration extinguished it. Your kids aren't going to be friends with the kids across the street who can't speak English, and woe to whomever complains about what a Mexican family's kids do outside of their immediate family members. You won't be friends with them either because they're essentially illiterate, and like to crank up the Mariachi music after work. A style of music that hasn't changed whatsoever since the 1950's.

    The blacks down the street's kids are hood rats living with their ineffectual grandma, since dad's in prison, and mom died of an overdose–or some other ridiculous variation.

    So... Bill and Hillary Clinton absolutely extinguished the "takes a village" crap when they ramped up Section 8 housing vouchers during their administration, and before them, Reagan legitimizing illegal aliens with his big fat stupid pardon, thereby normalizing lawlessness by foreign actors, together made village monitoring a matter for the police, activated by anonymous tips.

    No coherent middle-class = No village.

    , @new Stalin
    @Jack D

    Another and perhaps the biggest reason they say it takes a village to raise a child........because without DNA testing, no one in the village knows who da baby daddy is be.

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @Jack D

    Excellent. Thank you.

    , @profnasty
    @Jack D

    Major scam of Mexicans. Have baby here. Work off the books but DECLARE $3500 income. You're family is now eligible for complete welfare benefits. Probably about $30k worth. Plus $30k cash income.
    Hay Chihuahua!!!!

    , @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     

     
    It's nonsense. There isn't a factor of seven or eight difference in fatherlessness. Not anymore.


    But more on point, all the minoritarian "sociology" attempts to blame this or that--"poverty", "socio-economic status", "education", "fatherlessness"--miss the point. Blacks simply generate a lot more of the above. That's they are the source--the generators--of these conditions not passive victims.

    And when it comes to criminal violence the data show--as Steve has posted a time or two--that even if you skim off the "black cream"--economically or educationally--already a smaller slice, you still end up with blacks being significantly more criminally violent. Levels akin the bottom rung of the measures for whites.
    , @Johann Ricke
    @Jack D


    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     

     
    In MLK's time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites. Yet black crime was higher by about the same proportion relative to whites in that era. As Marty pointed out earlier, crime began skyrocketing in the 60's as crime rate per capita went up, while incarceration per crime went down. Such are the fruits of permissiveness in the criminal justice system. That murder per capita is the one crime that hasn't gone up since the sixties is largely a tribute to a combo of massaging the numbers (exemplified - for a non-murder stat - by "suicide by cop" being used by the FBI to characterize the attempting mass killing of GOP House Reps several years ago) and great leaps in emergency department medical care re injuries that would have been fatal prior to those advances.

    Replies: @AceDeuce

    , @res
    @Jack D

    That factoid needs a real citation. Did the Quora answer give one? Because as AnotherDad noted, the ratio is not anything like 7:1 in the current year.

    This page gives children in single parent families in 2019 as 24% for whites and 64% for blacks.
    https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race

    That aside, the rest of your comment seems on target.

  55. Zoos says:

    Seems to support my Django Unchained Theory,* after “Django Unchained” was released in 2012. Plenty of solid support throughout the year.

    *Django Unchained Theory claims that the Quentin Tarantino movie would cost even more black lives than the prior average, since the numerous jobless 85-or-lower IQ blacks would watch the movie repeatedly on their rented flat-screen TV’s, while assuming it to be a documentary, fomenting many many corresponding negative to ridiculous exchanges with the Police or White Authority Figures.

    • Agree: Charon
  56. @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

  57. A lot of blacks that got convicted were falsely convicted. Blacks have a higher rate of exoneration than whites, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Nobidy really believes these bogus statistics, which are heavily the result of corrupt pigs slapping charges on black men, often with the aid of jailhouse snitches. Most of this happens in the South and California. Southern “justice” is a motherfuker. We should have exterminated white southerners when we conquered them.

    • Troll: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Redmen
    @JohnPlywood

    JP-This comment is badly in need of citations. And a whole lot of editing. Or maybe you're just going for a Tyrone Green vibe. In which case, it's not bad.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEnmjDD_fTE

    , @silviosilver
    @JohnPlywood

    Yeah, and the people in victims of crime surveys who describe the perp as black at rates that match fbi stats are all liars, all of them. It's a conspiracy or something.

    (It's good that racial reality makes you mad and miserable though. Slimy POS's like you should certainly be made to feel mad and miserable as often possible. You deserve no less.)

    Replies: @Anonymous

  58. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    Single motherhood is strongly incentivized by government programs.

  59. Kudos to Steve for showing that second graph, the one at the bottom of his post. Too often, everywhere from financial news to other articles on sites like UR, we see only the close-focus charts that make things look jagged and really variable — when in fact so often things are not.

    The fact is, no more than about 13% of the US population is black, and yet they pretty much always, consistently commit fully half of the properly attributed murders in this country –and even more that are never solved or attributed to anybody.

    Again, thank you, Steve, for showing the real graph. Everyone should do that, but they so seldom do. This is not just about murders or racial issues at all. This goes on in the financial world and every other place where graphs and charts are used to convince people of one thing or another. My personal preference is always to see the entire “100%” graph, whatever it is. So often that reveals how small the changes are and what the real, consistent truth is, in just about everything.

  60. @Almost Missouri
    @gent

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It's probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    Replies: @Anon, @Travis, @res, @peterike

    You’re a fucking retard.

    That’s stagnation-tier and the 2% per 5 decades increase is due to immigration from Africa. Actual legacy blacks are indeed declining in number and everyone can palpably feel that, hence why you keep getting angry at everyone for being smarter than you.

  61. Zoos says:
    @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole “village” is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    “It takes a village” is a VERY middle-class conceit. Poor people won’t conform. Their social skills preclude the sense of propriety on either side. That is, if you tell the neighbor’s kid what to do, you could end up shot in the head.

    Rich folks don’t even see the kids next door, much less give a shit, and their nannies won’t care about neighborhood kids unless they’re paid.

    That leaves the middle-class, which DID function well under that conceit, until Section 8 housing and illegal immigration extinguished it. Your kids aren’t going to be friends with the kids across the street who can’t speak English, and woe to whomever complains about what a Mexican family’s kids do outside of their immediate family members. You won’t be friends with them either because they’re essentially illiterate, and like to crank up the Mariachi music after work. A style of music that hasn’t changed whatsoever since the 1950’s.

    The blacks down the street’s kids are hood rats living with their ineffectual grandma, since dad’s in prison, and mom died of an overdose–or some other ridiculous variation.

    So… Bill and Hillary Clinton absolutely extinguished the “takes a village” crap when they ramped up Section 8 housing vouchers during their administration, and before them, Reagan legitimizing illegal aliens with his big fat stupid pardon, thereby normalizing lawlessness by foreign actors, together made village monitoring a matter for the police, activated by anonymous tips.

    No coherent middle-class = No village.

    • Agree: Rob McX, Polistra
  62. @Almost Missouri
    @gent

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It's probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    Replies: @Anon, @Travis, @res, @peterike

    exactly….and if you examine the population under the age of 30 (which commits most of the crime) we see that Blacks are currently 14% of the population , up from 12% of this population back in 1990.

    Blacks have had higher fertility rates than whites for the past 100+ years. Black fertility was above 3 during the Seventies and Eighties when White fertility was below 2. Today as white fertility remains below 1.8 Black fertility is still above 2.

    The data is out there , easy to find birth data by race of mother.
    https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/6038-total-births-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/1729,573,133,16,11,6/2,1,4,13/12703,12704

    year -White births – Black births
    1995- 2,382,000 – 587,000
    2005- 2,279,000 – 584,000
    2015 – 2,130,000 – 589,000
    2019 – 1,954,000 – 577,000

    Births to White mothers is down 20% since 1995 while Births to Black mothers is down 1%. But White mothers can and do have Black babies, while none of the Black mothers can have a white baby. About 5% of the White births will have Black fathers, thus producing a Black child. While 1% of the Black Births will have a white Father their babies will all be Black. So the above statistics are under-counting Black babies and over-counting White babies.

    • Thanks: HammerJack, profnasty
    • Troll: JohnPlywood
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Travis

    Wrong, as usual. Black women have a higher rate of interracial marriage than white women and birth a large number of interracial children out of wedlock, mostly with white and Hispanic men. The percentage would be even higher if abortion were decriminalized - a significant number of interracial children would be born to black prostitutes if not for abortion.



    Also, black people are on average 22% white in America and can absolutely birth white sons. See also:



    https://preview.redd.it/ewlxwghh23e61.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b27b1de45154baf71ecccfa6dc608447b55eb60c

    Replies: @magila, @jallynn, @Boomthorkell

  63. @Redneck farmer
    Since according to TV commercials blacks are about half the population, isn't this about right?

    Replies: @Dr. X, @VivaLaMigra, @Thirdtwin

    Blacks are about half of the TV audience, so it makes sense that they are in at least half of the commercials.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
  64. @rebel yell
    What percentage of known murder victims are black? It would be good to compare that to the percent of blacks who are know murder offenders. The percent of murder victims who are black might be a better indicator of how many black murderers there really are, probably more than the 55% of known offenders. Since snitches get stitches in the black "community" it is likely that the known murder offenders under-states the true total of black murders. Since most murders are intra-racial the number of black murder victims will point to the true total of black murders (less the small number of blacks killed by other races).

    Replies: @blomblom

    https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/pages/home

    Typically total black murder victims tend to fall 10-15 points below the percentage of black murderers, just like typically total white murder victims tend to be 15-20 points above the rate of white murderers. Probably due to there being more whites in general. When broken down per capita though blacks tend to be disproportionately murderous, disproportionately violent and criminal really, in general.

    And those levels, as mentioned parent article, does not include the number of violent crime where the perps are unknown. If you could break down those unknowns by location, by neighborhood, you could reliably extrapolate the race the perps, and the blacks stats would look even more horrifying.

  65. Murders committed by whites are written off as surgical complications, collateral damage, abortions, etc.

    Kidnappings as public education.

  66. Yeah, I miss those 80s black guys

  67. @Almost Missouri
    @gent

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It's probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    Replies: @Anon, @Travis, @res, @peterike

    It’s good to see that JohnPlywood has joined Corvinus in offering his seal of approval (Disagree or Troll flag) to good comments.

    Thanks, John. It makes those good comments easier to find.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
    @res

    Plywood is Tiny Duck. Look at the comments and you see that he uses the Duck signature which is deliberately inserting little typing errors and malapropisms to let us know is playing a humorous role. Although, I’m a little disappointed that he hasn’t given us a real howler since he used the edgy “whites must give up their primates” line a couple of weeks ago.
    I think Corvinus is actually a serious commenter, Duck is just making fun of people who really think like him.

    , @Corvinus
    @res

    It’s great that you put spin on my disapproval. It only shows how right I am.

    Replies: @res

  68. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    Another and perhaps the biggest reason they say it takes a village to raise a child……..because without DNA testing, no one in the village knows who da baby daddy is be.

    • LOL: Alden
  69. res says:
    @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders (“snitches get stitches”) tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like “13% does 60% or 70%.”

    I used to think that, but my back of the envelope calculations indicate it is probably not true. See this comment for calculation.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/how-much-more-homicidal-are-blacks-than-whites-7-4x-more-like-the-obama-administration-said-or-11-7x-more/#comment-3946871

    The nonintuitive result seems to come from the larger number of whites murdered resulting in more uncleared white murders (even with a higher clearance rate) which are (in theory) disproportionately intra-racial.

    Your point that uncleared murders are more likely to be inter-racial than cleared murders is a good one though, but it would be hard to find data to check that.

    In any case, I think the population disparities as well as the presence of Hispanics in the numbers make your 70% speculation unlikely.

    All of that said, there is a depressing amount of truth in your final paragraph.

  70. @Anonymous
    @Almost Missouri

    Literally everything you wrote here is factually incorrect.

    Replies: @res

    Comments like that are much better if you actually offer support for your point.

    • Troll: JohnPlywood
    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
    @res

    Strongly disagree. Nobody needs offer support against blatant bullshit. An insult would have made the most better and more enjoyable.

    Replies: @anon

  71. @Anon
    @Anon

    The first question asked by old-time Wild West sheriffs upon arriving at a murder scene was, “Did he need killing?”

    I know this is a topic never discussed but what percentage of the “victims” of murder needed killing? I imagine there many scenarios where a serious threat or problem in a crowded, dysfunctional, inner-city environment can only be resolved extrajudicially.

    Relatedly, I think many of petty reasons given for a murder (argued over a TV remote, “he disrespected me”, etc.) are BS cover stories to hide the real reason— which can’t be discussed in an anti-snitch, don’t-put-my-bidness-out-on-da-street culture.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Rooster11

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home ‘hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don’t charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It’s like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    • Replies: @John Up North
    @Steve Sailer

    Former black football players who attend all black bars in or near the hood are often targeted for violence by black ex-cons. The ex-cons react with envy and anger when they see the former jocks throwing money around and attracting the attention of the lovely ladies.

    , @Morton's toes
    @Steve Sailer

    Harrison is way too slick an operator to get the actual blood on his hands. See the Rookie camp lecture where they are told always have a guy in your posse who can take the rap. I almost think OJ didn't do it and there was some kind of weird fix on him because he is definitely smart enough that he could get away with it like Harrison or Ray Lewis.

    , @gutta percha
    @Steve Sailer

    "Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison ..."

    I found a story about Harrison at GQ, but it is written in a bafflingly unreadable style, so I don't know if it is the same story.

    , @Desiderius
    @Steve Sailer

    The Scouring of the Shire, as it were.

  72. @res
    @Anonymous

    Comments like that are much better if you actually offer support for your point.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood

    Strongly disagree. Nobody needs offer support against blatant bullshit. An insult would have made the most better and more enjoyable.

    • LOL: res
    • Replies: @anon
    @JohnPlywood

    An insult would have made the most better and more enjoyable.

    •Dolt

  73. @JohnnyWalker123
    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. He specifically named Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Watch the first 20 seconds of the video below.

    https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1394452371279863808

    That's the same point that Stanley Kubric made in his 1999 film "Eyes Wide Shut."

    This settles it. We need to elect Tucker Carlson as our next president in 2024. The man is solid on everything - immigration, foreign policy, culture, demographics, Israel, etc. He's like my dream candidate.

    By the way, on one of his broadcasts, Tucker Carlson mentioned that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. He then mentioned that we should try to figure out *WHICH* intelligence agency Epstein worked for....

    Tucker Carlson is a brave man. He goes where most fear to tread.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @gent, @Truth

    So, a lifetime talking head who has never passed a piece of legislation in his life, and has no allies in congress is your next hope to save the conservatives party (white people)?

    After all, that worked so well from 2016-2020.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Truth


    who has never passed a piece of legislation in his life...
     
    That's a feature, not a bug.
  74. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Travis
    @Almost Missouri

    exactly....and if you examine the population under the age of 30 (which commits most of the crime) we see that Blacks are currently 14% of the population , up from 12% of this population back in 1990.

    Blacks have had higher fertility rates than whites for the past 100+ years. Black fertility was above 3 during the Seventies and Eighties when White fertility was below 2. Today as white fertility remains below 1.8 Black fertility is still above 2.

    The data is out there , easy to find birth data by race of mother.
    https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/6038-total-births-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/1729,573,133,16,11,6/2,1,4,13/12703,12704

    year -White births - Black births
    1995- 2,382,000 - 587,000
    2005- 2,279,000 - 584,000
    2015 - 2,130,000 - 589,000
    2019 - 1,954,000 - 577,000

    Births to White mothers is down 20% since 1995 while Births to Black mothers is down 1%. But White mothers can and do have Black babies, while none of the Black mothers can have a white baby. About 5% of the White births will have Black fathers, thus producing a Black child. While 1% of the Black Births will have a white Father their babies will all be Black. So the above statistics are under-counting Black babies and over-counting White babies.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Wrong, as usual. Black women have a higher rate of interracial marriage than white women and birth a large number of interracial children out of wedlock, mostly with white and Hispanic men. The percentage would be even higher if abortion were decriminalized – a significant number of interracial children would be born to black prostitutes if not for abortion.

    Also, black people are on average 22% white in America and can absolutely birth white sons. See also:

    • Replies: @magila
    @Anonymous

    How much whiskey do you think it took for the Irishman to make it with an abo woman?

    Replies: @bruce county

    , @jallynn
    @Anonymous

    I'm not sure why are you are using Australian Aboriginals to prove your assertion.

    , @Boomthorkell
    @Anonymous

    Aborigines have different genes and inherited feature traits than Africans. Steve did an article one exactly that. African physical trait genes seem to not be recessive...unlike blue eyes and red hair, for an example.

    Maybe\maybe not with black prostitutes. Do you know from personal experience? I recall two once leaping at my crotch in Las Vegas, which implies this strategy must have worked on someone at some point, if not me.

    I'm willing to believe your statistics though, or at least that they were collected in good faith, even if this picture was not used in good faith (it even says on it that it is about aboriginal blood.) Care to provide them?

    They sure are 22% white. Guess it wasn't enough. Maybe it was just enough, but for what?

  75. @anon
    The only way to correct this type of institutional racism is to send all their children to the Ivy League, then they'll all come out doctors, lawyers, management consultants, investment bankers and academics, instead of continuing with the cycle of poverty and crime. It's time to make the Ivy League 100% black, and I don't mean Nigerians or Ghanaians, these elite insitutions must be strictly for black children of fathers who have been incarcerated. It's the only reparation acceptable for centuries of institutional racism.

    Replies: @Truth, @Rob McX

    Don’t be jealous because you didn’t get in, bro. I’m sure your Associates degree in Hotel and Restaurant Management from Kansas City Trade Tech was an excellent investment.

  76. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    Excellent. Thank you.

  77. @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @gent

    The Black population has been growing for decades. Back in 1990 there were 30 million Blacks, which was 12% of the US population. Today we have 44 million Blacks which is 13% of the population. Among the under 30 population Blacks are 14% of the population today , higher than 1990.

    The US Black population has grown 50% since 1990 while the white population grew just 4%. Not sure why people think the Black population is declining. It is the white population which is declining.

    Replies: @Rob McX

    Shows like that have been around for a long time, but they often tried to feature a disproportionately high number of white killers. A lot of people probably prefer watching shows about whites anyway, because murders by blacks are so monotonously stupid and depressing.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Rob McX

    Sorry, this was meant to be a reply to Dan Smith's comment:



    Watch a few dozen episodes of the popular A&E reality show First 48. Overwhelming majority of the murders are committed by blacks against blacks. Motives: robberies, disrespect, eliminating witnesses. Rarely a crime of passion. I’m shocked the show is still on the air.
     
    , @Feryl
    @Rob McX

    Plus white criminals can spin intricate webs, and often can affect something resembling a normal life. But there are few cunning black criminals, most are blunt and obnoxious.

  78. Hey guys, an evening of these statistics in inevitable. Our prison mentorship program is working well!

    https://worldstar.com/video.php?v=wshhHlgD81gIX2faOQ46

  79. Might be difficult to undertake but finding out the reason people kill would be interesting. I’ve watched most every episode of Snapped, Forensic Files, The First 48 etc and there does seem to be a difference in what motivates people to kill ( and methods used).

    For whites money and child custody are big issues. Husbands don’t want to pay alimony and women want their husbands assets and or insurance policies. These are seldom the issues in black homicides save for starting an argument that leads to an immediate homicidal rage.

    I suspect white homicide rates are inflated somewhat by spectacular gun rampages like that of Stephen Paddock in Las Vegas , James Huberty shooting 25 people to death at a San Diego McDonalds, the Newtown elementary school massacre and like incidents where a lone gunman exacts a very high death toll. About the only negro shooter in this category I can recall was Aaron Alexis who killed 12 during his rampage at the Washington Navy Yard. My rough estimate is maybe 25 to 30 homicides per year fall into the rampaging solitary gunmen category.

    It might also be useful to know if there are any racial differences in alcohol related shootings. Given the number of mass shootings outside black nightclubs, strip clubs and house parties I think there must be but again there doesn’t seem to be data on this.

  80. @JohnPlywood
    @res

    Strongly disagree. Nobody needs offer support against blatant bullshit. An insult would have made the most better and more enjoyable.

    Replies: @anon

    An insult would have made the most better and more enjoyable.

    •Dolt

  81. @anon
    The only way to correct this type of institutional racism is to send all their children to the Ivy League, then they'll all come out doctors, lawyers, management consultants, investment bankers and academics, instead of continuing with the cycle of poverty and crime. It's time to make the Ivy League 100% black, and I don't mean Nigerians or Ghanaians, these elite insitutions must be strictly for black children of fathers who have been incarcerated. It's the only reparation acceptable for centuries of institutional racism.

    Replies: @Truth, @Rob McX

    The only way to correct this type of institutional racism is to send all their children to the Ivy League, then they’ll all come out doctors, lawyers, management consultants, investment bankers and academics...

    I thought they were already. Looks like TV is lagging behind real life by a decade or two.

  82. @Rob McX
    @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Shows like that have been around for a long time, but they often tried to feature a disproportionately high number of white killers. A lot of people probably prefer watching shows about whites anyway, because murders by blacks are so monotonously stupid and depressing.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @Feryl

    Sorry, this was meant to be a reply to Dan Smith’s comment:

    Watch a few dozen episodes of the popular A&E reality show First 48. Overwhelming majority of the murders are committed by blacks against blacks. Motives: robberies, disrespect, eliminating witnesses. Rarely a crime of passion. I’m shocked the show is still on the air.

    • Agree: Buffalo Joe
  83. @JohnPlywood
    @Almost Missouri

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders, you stupid fuck, and stranger murders are more likely to be interracial (logically), but interracial murders aren't significantly more likely to be stranger murders.


    Imagine being as low-IQ and hysterical as this fucking cuck, "almost missouri".

    Replies: @rebel yell, @Whiskey, @Mike Tre

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders

    No, unsolved murders are not more likely to involve white offenders. In raw numbers, unsolved murders will likely follow at least the averages of solved murders, so at least 55% of unsolved murders will have black offenders.
    The real question is whether unsolved murders with black victims are a higher percentage of unsolved murders than solved murders with black victims are of solved murders. If so, that would indicate that more than 55% of unsolved murders have black offenders, and that black offenders commit more, perhaps much more, than 55% of all murders.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @rebel yell

    A lot of murders committed by whites are domestics, which are usually solved. A fair number of murders committed by whites are solved by the murderer then shooting himself. White organized criminals generally don't shoot up block parties over feeling dissed. If the fate of Joe Pesci's character in "Goodfellas" is representative, white mobsters with that kind of personality don't last that long.

    Probably some white prison gang / biker types get away with murders at parties by intimidating witnesses, but it's a lot rarer than among gangstas.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @martin_2, @Bill Jones

    , @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

  84. @Bardon Kaldian
    OT

    Billy the Kid has been, all the time, a naughty lecher. Who would have thought ....

    https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-image-likable-nerdy-philanthropist-fell-apart-2021-5

    Bill Gates crafted a public image as a likable, nerdy do-gooder. Office affairs, 'uncomfortable' workplace behavior, and Epstein ties reveal cracks in his facade.

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/30/70/4530701092876dc0d3f7db873fc19463.gif

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @jon

    Gates is starting to look like Warren Buffet, who has carefully cultivated his, “aw shucks, I just like to sit at home and watch football in Omaha,” image for many, many years.

    Meanwhile, he owns fucking NetJets and can go anywhere he wants at a moment’s notice. Good for him.

    Don’t be fooled. As soon as Warren bought my father’s company, he hatcheted the retirement program and health insurance to the maximum. He is a psychopath, like many people at that level. That is why they are at that level, and you do not want to be one of them.

    Bill Gates is a creep who had family connections at IBM, which allowed him to meet there and — oh yes, to his “credit” — do a deal that allowed his little, pissant, Microsoft company to keep rights to the software that ran the IBM PC. The rest is history. Gates is not a genius, he is yet another in a long line of psychopathic monopolists.

    I realize Steve Sailer was taught in UCLA MBA school (LOL) that it is the GOAL of a business to become a monopoly. Well, that’s just fine. If it is a goal, then of the rest of us have the perfect right and responsibility toi eliminate and destroy, by any means necessary, MONOPOLIES. To hell with them, God damn them, and THINK FOR YOURSELF.

    • Agree: JohnnyWalker123
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Buzz Mohawk

    In the words of C. Montgomery Burns of The Simpsons:

    "Family, religion, friends... these are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business."

  85. anon[342] • Disclaimer says:

    Gates is starting to look like Warren Buffet, who has carefully cultivated his, “aw shucks, I just like to sit at home and watch football in Omaha,” image for many, many years.

    Buffet has always been a fan of inheritance taxes. Must be that civic duty. Or, maybe, the fact that a lot of middle class people still rely on life insurance to cover some inheritance issues, plus the fact that Buffett has long owned chunks of the big US life insurance companies also has something to do with it.

    The story of Buffett and his first wife is an interesting one, there’s surely some parts left out, too.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    Replies: @anon, @Buzz Mohawk, @anon

  86. @Dan Smith
    Watch a few dozen episodes of the popular A&E reality show First 48. Overwhelming majority of the murders are committed by blacks against blacks. Motives: robberies, disrespect, eliminating witnesses. Rarely a crime of passion. I’m shocked the show is still on the air.

    Replies: @donut, @Ed

    A couple of the cities where they filmed canceled their contracts with the show because of that issue .

  87. @RichardTaylor
    A comedian on Joe Rogan talked about the rough time he had with some homeless black thugs in Austin. It looks like the "well behaved" white liberal yuppies are brining destruction to yet another city. White Flight continues as long as anti-White policies are in effect.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1eZxsPZZcE

    Replies: @FPD72, @Tex

    Austin voters just passed a referendum that reestablished a camping ban on city property. Of course, the enforcement of the ban will depend on the far-left district attorney and city courts. Governor Abbot is threatening to get the Texas Department of Public Safety involved if the city and county don’t act.

    Austin is not experiencing white flight. The black percentage of residents has actually been declining for the past ten years.

  88. @anon
    Gates is starting to look like Warren Buffet, who has carefully cultivated his, “aw shucks, I just like to sit at home and watch football in Omaha,” image for many, many years.

    Buffet has always been a fan of inheritance taxes. Must be that civic duty. Or, maybe, the fact that a lot of middle class people still rely on life insurance to cover some inheritance issues, plus the fact that Buffett has long owned chunks of the big US life insurance companies also has something to do with it.

    The story of Buffett and his first wife is an interesting one, there's surely some parts left out, too.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    • Replies: @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    I have no idea about that. Not a clue.

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @Steve Sailer


    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?
     
    Gee. Wow. We dunno. What's the point of asking the question if you don't know about it at all? Such gossip is interesting, but really, Steve, what's your point? Please, elaborate.

    There are those of us who would have schtupped with Ms. Graham just because she was Ms. Graham. That includes me.

    BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)

    Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    , @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    Buffett had an unusually close relationship with Graham. Buffett is simply not a very sexual guy. He is definitely on the spectrum.

    He has been popular for his money for long enough to recognize it, and is wary regarding attention from women.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

  89. @JohnPlywood
    A lot of blacks that got convicted were falsely convicted. Blacks have a higher rate of exoneration than whites, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Nobidy really believes these bogus statistics, which are heavily the result of corrupt pigs slapping charges on black men, often with the aid of jailhouse snitches. Most of this happens in the South and California. Southern "justice" is a motherfuker. We should have exterminated white southerners when we conquered them.

    Replies: @Redmen, @silviosilver

    JP-This comment is badly in need of citations. And a whole lot of editing. Or maybe you’re just going for a Tyrone Green vibe. In which case, it’s not bad.

  90. @rebel yell
    @JohnPlywood


    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders
     
    No, unsolved murders are not more likely to involve white offenders. In raw numbers, unsolved murders will likely follow at least the averages of solved murders, so at least 55% of unsolved murders will have black offenders.
    The real question is whether unsolved murders with black victims are a higher percentage of unsolved murders than solved murders with black victims are of solved murders. If so, that would indicate that more than 55% of unsolved murders have black offenders, and that black offenders commit more, perhaps much more, than 55% of all murders.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @JohnPlywood

    A lot of murders committed by whites are domestics, which are usually solved. A fair number of murders committed by whites are solved by the murderer then shooting himself. White organized criminals generally don’t shoot up block parties over feeling dissed. If the fate of Joe Pesci’s character in “Goodfellas” is representative, white mobsters with that kind of personality don’t last that long.

    Probably some white prison gang / biker types get away with murders at parties by intimidating witnesses, but it’s a lot rarer than among gangstas.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Steve Sailer

    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there's a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they're less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.

    Replies: @Tex

    , @martin_2
    @Steve Sailer

    Joe Pesci's character was based on some nutter who was killed by other mobsters when he was only twenty six. As you point out, psychos who are that far out do not live as long as was portrayed in Goodfellas.

    , @Bill Jones
    @Steve Sailer

    A clue to unsolved murders lies in the location. If in Vermont you're probably looking for a white guy.
    Martin Luther King Blvd in say Phillie, probably not.

  91. Anonymous[235] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    When you factor in the unsolved murders, the percentage likely jumps to over 60%. It turns out that over 70% of unsolved murder victims are black. And since the vast majority of blacks are killed by other blacks, we can infer that most unsolved black murderers are also black. From the Washington Post:

    "In the past decade, police in 52 of the nation’s largest cities have failed to make an arrest in nearly 26,000 killings, according to a Washington Post analysis of homicide arrest data. In more than 18,600 of those cases, the victim, like Jackman, was black.

    Black victims, who accounted for the majority of homicides, were the least likely of any racial group to have their killings result in an arrest, The Post found. While police arrested someone in 63 percent of the killings of white victims, they did so in just 47 percent of those with black victims."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/investigations/black-homicides-arrests/

    Replies: @Anonymous

    When you factor in the unsolved murders, the percentage likely jumps to over 60%. It turns out that over 70% of unsolved murder victims are black.

    So 13/50 is inaccurate, and it’s more like 4/60?

  92. Anonymous[235] • Disclaimer says:
    @Elli
    In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races

    https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezashr/asp/vic_display.asp

    Replies: @Anonymous

    In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races

    What is the significance of that?

    • Replies: @jon
    @Anonymous


    What is the significance of that?
     
    For black victims with a known murderer, only about 10% of the perps are non-black. So a good rough estimate would be that around 90% of the unsolved murders of blacks are also done by blacks. You can tweak it a little from there, depending how you try to estimate if unknown murderers are more or less likely to be black.
    , @Brandt
    @Anonymous

    The significance here is that of 26,277 blacks murdered 11,292 are unsolved, meaning all the stats are worthless

  93. Auld ways be the best ways.

    Isn’t it nice that in this day and age, some things remain changeless over time?

  94. @Steve Sailer
    @rebel yell

    A lot of murders committed by whites are domestics, which are usually solved. A fair number of murders committed by whites are solved by the murderer then shooting himself. White organized criminals generally don't shoot up block parties over feeling dissed. If the fate of Joe Pesci's character in "Goodfellas" is representative, white mobsters with that kind of personality don't last that long.

    Probably some white prison gang / biker types get away with murders at parties by intimidating witnesses, but it's a lot rarer than among gangstas.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @martin_2, @Bill Jones

    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there’s a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they’re less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.

    • Replies: @Tex
    @Rob McX


    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there’s a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they’re less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.
     
    The only direct info I have on that subject runs a little different. A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. "Last week's victim is next week's perp." Typical cases run like this, a guy is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever some unknown person takes a shot at him.

    Everyone in the neighborhood knows it was some other guy who had a beef over something or other. But, no one will tell the cops and gossip isn't a good basis for a warrant.

    So next week, the other guy is is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever someone takes a shot at him. This pattern repeats until one or the other improves his aim. Then the cops have a pretty good chance of nailing the guy. But there's always next week at 2 AM...

    Replies: @Rob McX

  95. Pre-K training of the next generation of white-hating blacks (first 7 seconds):

    Also: JUST IN – North Carolina DA says the shooting of Andrew Brown was justified. Bodycam footage released.

    • Replies: @prosa123
    @CCZ

    That woman is pathetic. She made no attempt to defend herself. Fight back, for Christ's sakes.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

  96. @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    Replies: @anon, @Buzz Mohawk, @anon

    I have no idea about that. Not a clue.

  97. @AndrewR
    @TruthRevolution.net

    You already can't even mention these stats to "progressives" without being accused of racism. We don't have a black problem in this country so much as we have a Democrat problem. But I suppose the real problem is that "conservatives" are too lazy/dumb/cowardly to shut the anti-white left down.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Good point. The majority of whites , Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Communists and independents are afraid and fear being cancelled and are not willing to speak-out because they will lose their jobs , friends and family.

    Plus there are not any viable political solutions. Most whites are not effected by Black violence. Most whites live in white neighborhoods and spend extra money on housing to keep their children away from Blacks.

  98. @West reanimator
    @Clyde


    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.
     
    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.

    "Law and order" Reagan granted amnesty to millions of border jumpers.

    Replies: @Clyde

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.

    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.

    Of course I saw this about Reagan’s second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today. Look at the graph again (w all due respect)
    Translation– “You don’t know what you got ’till its gone” — Joni Mitchell
    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone! This is how the ChiComs can be moving in today to neutralize us and prevail. And I saw this all happen. Patrick Buchanan warned us starting in 1988!

    If you are young and want a South African situation, then you are getting it and our blacks never even mined gold and diamonds for our elites that trickled down some to the South African white plebs. Just some effin southern states cotton. Picked and processed by our now useless blacks. Cotton that was mostly shipped to Great Britain where when woven into textiles would have 500% value added to it. 500% is my guess-timate

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Clyde

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    Replies: @Clyde, @John Up North, @Redman

    , @Anonymous
    @Clyde


    Of course I saw this about Reagan’s second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today.
     
    An equally interesting question is what were the rates of black violence pre-1970s? What were they like during Jim Crow and in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s?
    , @silviosilver
    @Clyde


    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone!
     
    The Boomercon is strong in this one. Back on planet earth, everyone remembers the 80s as the era of exploding trade (and budget) deficits and the beginning of American deindustrialization. (They were "minimal" only in comparison to what would come later. In their own day, they were unprecedented.)

    The only lasting Reagan legacies were the monumentally false sense of security that 60s-style libtard lunacy was safely behind us and the millions of illegals that were amnestied. In other words, the "Reagan Revolution" accomplished sweet fuck all.
  99. @Anon
    Has any researcher hazarded a guess on the unknown murder offenders? For instance, how many of the victims are blacks living in snitches-get-stitches black neighborhoods? How many were killed in a Sailer's Law bullet-spray attack? It seems like you could plus-or-minus make a reasonable guess on the race of the killers.

    Replies: @Anon, @Almost Missouri, @3g4me

    @2 Anon[130]: Based on the “murderer charged after modern DNA analysis” stories I’ve seen in the headlines, I’d say it was 9-1 black to White. This fits with my hypothesis that the only blacks over age 12 without a criminal record are those who haven’t yet been caught.

    • Replies: @Ed Case
    @3g4me

    Hang on a sec, pal.
    There's that Supreme Court dude, he's pretty upstanding.
    And Prince, I find it hard to believe he killed anyone.
    Don't forget Thomas Sowell and Gary Coleman ...

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

  100. Another Sailor rule of mass shootings in Oakland. Check out all bullet holes in this bus, plus all the little white tags for shell casing. Just another day in Oakland.

    • Replies: @Farenheit
    @George Taylor

    It's called "Oaktown" for a reason!

    , @Buffalo Joe
    @George Taylor

    George, in Etobicoke, Ontario, a Toronto suburb, a 100 rounds fired and one black dead, three wounded.

  101. @Clyde
    @West reanimator

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.


    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.
     
    Of course I saw this about Reagan's second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today. Look at the graph again (w all due respect)
    Translation-- "You don't know what you got 'till its gone" -- Joni Mitchell
    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone! This is how the ChiComs can be moving in today to neutralize us and prevail. And I saw this all happen. Patrick Buchanan warned us starting in 1988!

    If you are young and want a South African situation, then you are getting it and our blacks never even mined gold and diamonds for our elites that trickled down some to the South African white plebs. Just some effin southern states cotton. Picked and processed by our now useless blacks. Cotton that was mostly shipped to Great Britain where when woven into textiles would have 500% value added to it. 500% is my guess-timate

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @silviosilver

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Steve Sailer


    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.
     
    I agree on the when and where. Interesting how crack cranks you up. The USA was still a mega manufacturer in 1896. The most popular drugs in Japan, Korea, Taiwan are uppers- amphetamines-methedrines of various sorts. Yakuza gangsters are big in the distribution. Supposedly North Korea is a big methedrine manufacturer. Probably meth consumption is big in Mainland China too, but I have read nothing on this

    So the producers and manufacturing nations of the far east like meth, in so many words.
    While in the USA, we want more downers such as heroin and OxyContin-- the various oxy-codones. China and Mexico send us the most super downer ever invented, called fentanyl. That heroin gets cut with these days.
    Real manufacturing keeps sunsetting and gets worse here. Our trade deficit was at record highs last month. Our forte is manufacturing US Dollars to keep our fiat money game of musical chairs going.
    We in the USA are chilling out on downers while the far east is on uppers.

    Btw-- last month had inflation at 4% higher than last April.

    , @John Up North
    @Steve Sailer

    Another horrible outcome of the crack epidemic was the phenomenon of brain damaged crack babies. The oldest crack baby would be in his early 40s by now.

    , @Redman
    @Steve Sailer

    Tell that to Hunter Biden.

  102. @Almost Missouri
    @JohnnyWalker123


    On his show tonight, Tucker Carlson said that the world is run by a small group of powerful pedophiles. ... “Eyes Wide Shut.”
     
    Okay, but Tucker's not saying that they are a robed cult of ritual child sacrificers (“Eyes Wide Shut”), but rather that a probable Mossad asset created kompromat on every important public and political figure by using underage prostitutes.

    Which may be worse politically, if somewhat less repulsive morally.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123

    Mossad asset created kompromat on every important public and political figure by using underage prostitutes.

    Mostly this, but check this out. Epstein seems to have had a bizarre obsession with the Occult.

    https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/jeffrey-epstein-the-true-ugly-face-of-the-occult-elite/

    Remember that Temple he had on his island?

    That is weirder than anything in EWS.

    So is the bizarre fascination that our elites have with Marina Abramovich. Why would so many of them hang out with her? Why would the Rothschilds?

    Why would Microsoft use her in an ad?

  103. @Steve Sailer
    @rebel yell

    A lot of murders committed by whites are domestics, which are usually solved. A fair number of murders committed by whites are solved by the murderer then shooting himself. White organized criminals generally don't shoot up block parties over feeling dissed. If the fate of Joe Pesci's character in "Goodfellas" is representative, white mobsters with that kind of personality don't last that long.

    Probably some white prison gang / biker types get away with murders at parties by intimidating witnesses, but it's a lot rarer than among gangstas.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @martin_2, @Bill Jones

    Joe Pesci’s character was based on some nutter who was killed by other mobsters when he was only twenty six. As you point out, psychos who are that far out do not live as long as was portrayed in Goodfellas.

  104. @Almost Missouri
    @gent

    No. Everyone here seems to think this no matter how many times I point out it is not true.

    year | %black

    1970 11.1%
    1980 11.7%
    1990 12.1%
    2000 12.3%
    2010 12.6%

    It's probably above 13% now.

    Source: US census.

    In fact, the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930 and the founding of the welfare state. Prior to that, the black portion of the population was gradually subsiding from its high of 21% at Independence, having reached a low of 9.7% before the Great Reversal began.

    Replies: @Anon, @Travis, @res, @peterike

    the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930

    Indeed. The only reason the percentage of blacks stays kind of the same is that we’re flooding the nation with even more non-black people of color. But the percentage of the black population is nearly meaningless compared to the TOTAL number of blacks.

    The United States has a finite amount of space. The available living space now contains more blacks than ever before. And that’s why it feels like there are a lot more blacks around where there didn’t used to be 10 or 20 years ago. Because there’s LOTS and LOTS more of them. And various government actions are spreading them around. They have to go someplace. And the place they’re going to is a nice white neighborhood near you.

    • Agree: 3g4me, Charon
    • Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @peterike

    True, and the other part of the equation is the number of whites. Since the number of whites is actually declining so the ratio of whites to Blacks has gone from 6 to 1 in 1990 to 4 to 1 today.

    Replies: @Polistra

  105. @Anonymous
    The murder rate was far higher in 1980 than it was in 2020, so I guess whites were over-represented in the "unknown" murder offender category.

    Some food for thought:


    https://atlas.qz.com/i/atlas_E1pEnFs7e.png

    https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FT_20.05.05_ImprisonmentRates_1.png

    https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/17dab36/2147483647/resize/640x/quality/85/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.beam.usnews.com%2F1e%2Fec%2F5b9830194ee295b9297232a19a30%2F160929-homicides-graphic.png

    https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/918c309/2147483647/resize/640x/quality/85/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.beam.usnews.com%2Fc0%2F9d%2F02f99d3240a5954bc5c688f0cddc%2F160929-interracialkillings-graphic.png

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @yak-15

    What a disingenuous post. Your murder charts stop in 2015 after they begin to uptick.

  106. @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    Replies: @anon, @Buzz Mohawk, @anon

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    Gee. Wow. We dunno. What’s the point of asking the question if you don’t know about it at all? Such gossip is interesting, but really, Steve, what’s your point? Please, elaborate.

    There are those of us who would have schtupped with Ms. Graham just because she was Ms. Graham. That includes me.

    BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)

    • Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Buzz Mohawk

    "BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)"

    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?

    Replies: @Chris Renner

  107. @Steve Sailer
    @Anon

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home 'hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don't charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It's like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    Replies: @John Up North, @Morton's toes, @gutta percha, @Desiderius

    Former black football players who attend all black bars in or near the hood are often targeted for violence by black ex-cons. The ex-cons react with envy and anger when they see the former jocks throwing money around and attracting the attention of the lovely ladies.

    • Agree: Clyde
  108. @3g4me
    @Anon

    @2 Anon[130]: Based on the "murderer charged after modern DNA analysis" stories I've seen in the headlines, I'd say it was 9-1 black to White. This fits with my hypothesis that the only blacks over age 12 without a criminal record are those who haven't yet been caught.

    Replies: @Ed Case

    Hang on a sec, pal.
    There’s that Supreme Court dude, he’s pretty upstanding.
    And Prince, I find it hard to believe he killed anyone.
    Don’t forget Thomas Sowell and Gary Coleman …

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Ed Case

    She really should have stuck to "9-to-1," which she referenced. I find that realistic.

    Plus, and more important, her point is very, very valid. You and many others here need to dispense with your Aspergery tendancy to take things literally. Her anectote about "blacks over 12" is very funny and filled with grains of truth.

    You know this.

  109. Anonymous[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Buzz Mohawk
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Gates is starting to look like Warren Buffet, who has carefully cultivated his, "aw shucks, I just like to sit at home and watch football in Omaha," image for many, many years.

    Meanwhile, he owns fucking NetJets and can go anywhere he wants at a moment's notice. Good for him.

    Don't be fooled. As soon as Warren bought my father's company, he hatcheted the retirement program and health insurance to the maximum. He is a psychopath, like many people at that level. That is why they are at that level, and you do not want to be one of them.

    Bill Gates is a creep who had family connections at IBM, which allowed him to meet there and -- oh yes, to his "credit" -- do a deal that allowed his little, pissant, Microsoft company to keep rights to the software that ran the IBM PC. The rest is history. Gates is not a genius, he is yet another in a long line of psychopathic monopolists.

    I realize Steve Sailer was taught in UCLA MBA school (LOL) that it is the GOAL of a business to become a monopoly. Well, that's just fine. If it is a goal, then of the rest of us have the perfect right and responsibility toi eliminate and destroy, by any means necessary, MONOPOLIES. To hell with them, God damn them, and THINK FOR YOURSELF.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    In the words of C. Montgomery Burns of The Simpsons:

    “Family, religion, friends… these are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business.”

  110. @Ed Case
    @3g4me

    Hang on a sec, pal.
    There's that Supreme Court dude, he's pretty upstanding.
    And Prince, I find it hard to believe he killed anyone.
    Don't forget Thomas Sowell and Gary Coleman ...

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    She really should have stuck to “9-to-1,” which she referenced. I find that realistic.

    Plus, and more important, her point is very, very valid. You and many others here need to dispense with your Aspergery tendancy to take things literally. Her anectote about “blacks over 12” is very funny and filled with grains of truth.

    You know this.

    • Thanks: 3g4me
  111. despite all the Blacks killing each other it is the White population which is declining over the past decade as the Black population increased to a record 45 million Blacks in America.

    in 2020 there were 2.6 million white deaths and under 1.9 million White births.

  112. @rebel yell
    @JohnPlywood


    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders
     
    No, unsolved murders are not more likely to involve white offenders. In raw numbers, unsolved murders will likely follow at least the averages of solved murders, so at least 55% of unsolved murders will have black offenders.
    The real question is whether unsolved murders with black victims are a higher percentage of unsolved murders than solved murders with black victims are of solved murders. If so, that would indicate that more than 55% of unsolved murders have black offenders, and that black offenders commit more, perhaps much more, than 55% of all murders.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @JohnPlywood

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.

    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    • Thanks: Truth
    • Troll: Clyde
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @JohnPlywood

    That's why gardeners are always finding murdered corpses in shallow graves in Lexington, Scarsdale, and Palo Alto.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

    , @rebel yell
    @JohnPlywood


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.
     
    Well, you got me there. There's no rational rebuttal to being called a maggot. I concede that you're a better name-caller than I'll ever be.
    , @Colin Wright
    @JohnPlywood

    'No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.'

    I doubt it. Disproportionately, what white murders there are are going to fall into the 'in eighty percent of all homicides, the killer knows the victim' category. It's not going to be hard to figure out who killed Mrs. Brown if the neighbors heard Mr. and Mrs. Brown fighting loudly every night.

    Your basic white homicide is like that the father of my daughter's boyfriend witnessed. Two neighbors started arguing, then one got a gun and killed the other. Stupid -- but not hard to solve.

    Disproportionately, it's blacks who murder total strangers for no reason at all. That's why blacks disproportionately receive the death penalty. They're the ones who commit the killings for which there was no excuse at all.

    So black stupidity and carelessness notwithstanding, disproportionately it's blacks who were the unknown assailant who shot and killed that cab driver or whatever. For all their faults, a non-black would be highly unlikely to commit such a crime.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood, @JohnnyWalker123

    , @Colin Wright
    @JohnPlywood

    'I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.'

    I like how those on the Left so consistently parade their utter intolerance and hostility to anyone who fails to toe their intellectual line.

    Nature's Fascists -- they're always with us, eh? Sometimes one name, sometimes another -- but always with us.

    , @Mike Tre
    @JohnPlywood

    Won't see this in the national news, right Nataraj?

    https://leakedreality.com/video/10943/youtube-ban-asian-uber-driver-and-2-white-female-passengers-being-attacked-by-african-american-mob

    , @Boomthorkell
    @JohnPlywood

    Ah, you seem to imply the Blacks also do not have unsolved murders.

    Is this implying an HBD bias on your part, that Blacks are less capable of having unsolved murder cases than whites? That would be racist and paranoid, John. I'm sure they can get away with murder just as good as any Korean or Swede-descendant, whose higher IQ nature would absolutely be connected to cleverer ways to murder people and definitely not doing-things-in-life-besides-killing-each-other-over-foolish-things.

    Why set up a straw man? You're plywood. If you could support the lawn mower we got the other day, you can support a more logically consistent argument. Maybe you just prefer to call people maggots. Probably that.

  113. I recently came across some images of the city of Shanghai. They depicted a rather stunning city, gleaming skyscrapers. Similar to many of the cities in oil rich middle eastern countries.

    Compare those images to current day Los Angeles with miles of homeless encampments. Or to New York, now a dying, dangerous hell scape. Or the ruins of Detroit. Or Chicago, a city that had 30+ shootings just last weekend.

    Now not all of this destruction of formerly great cities cannot be blamed on negroes. But most of it stems from this source. And now we are gripped with this new religion of negro worship. It’s quite a nightmare.

  114. @Steve Sailer
    @Clyde

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    Replies: @Clyde, @John Up North, @Redman

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    I agree on the when and where. Interesting how crack cranks you up. The USA was still a mega manufacturer in 1896. The most popular drugs in Japan, Korea, Taiwan are uppers- amphetamines-methedrines of various sorts. Yakuza gangsters are big in the distribution. Supposedly North Korea is a big methedrine manufacturer. Probably meth consumption is big in Mainland China too, but I have read nothing on this

    So the producers and manufacturing nations of the far east like meth, in so many words.
    While in the USA, we want more downers such as heroin and OxyContin– the various oxy-codones. China and Mexico send us the most super downer ever invented, called fentanyl. That heroin gets cut with these days.
    Real manufacturing keeps sunsetting and gets worse here. Our trade deficit was at record highs last month. Our forte is manufacturing US Dollars to keep our fiat money game of musical chairs going.
    We in the USA are chilling out on downers while the far east is on uppers.

    Btw– last month had inflation at 4% higher than last April.

  115. Steve, thank you for the data from the soon to be trash canned FBI official crime stat source. Math is not your friend when the data goes against the narrative.

  116. Steve, this is an article which I think might interest you. It’s on a totally unrelated subject, but I don’t know how to submit articles to you any other way.

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/american-grown-truffle-breakthrough-180977702/

    I smell a “Theranos” story. There are just too many perfect hooks in this story. African genius, ghetto black founders, hidden methodologies that came to him “in a dream”, etc.

    Sounds like a fully-woke Brooklyn hipster bullshit artist’s dream scam….what do you think?

    I’d love it to be true, but it just seems to not pass the smell test.

  117. @Steve Sailer
    @Clyde

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    Replies: @Clyde, @John Up North, @Redman

    Another horrible outcome of the crack epidemic was the phenomenon of brain damaged crack babies. The oldest crack baby would be in his early 40s by now.

  118. @Tex
    OT, since Mak da Knife, the gentlest stabber, her fifteen minutes of fame are up. Here's noted firearms Youtuber Paul Harrell examining whether shooting the knife out of an attacker's hand is realistic. In addition to questions of accuracy, Harrell delves into bullet penetration.

    Sorry, I'm still iffy on embedding videos.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq_XzqWsG3w

    I came to the conclusion that Paul Harrell is an excellent marksman.

    Replies: @prosa123

    Not only is Paul Harrell an excellent marksman, but unlike other firearms fans who merely boast about how they’re totally able and ready to shoot criminals in self-defense, he actually did it.

  119. @CCZ
    Pre-K training of the next generation of white-hating blacks (first 7 seconds):

    https://twitter.com/CitizenAnalyst/status/1394704706459643906

    Also: JUST IN - North Carolina DA says the shooting of Andrew Brown was justified. Bodycam footage released.

    Replies: @prosa123

    That woman is pathetic. She made no attempt to defend herself. Fight back, for Christ’s sakes.

    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    @prosa123

    prosa, I would bet she now uses the "n-word" when describing her opponent.

  120. Well I suppose that anonymity (if you are a murderer) could be considered as “white privilege”. How do we know that 100% of the unknowns are not privileged white supremacist murderers? The problem with the data is that only about half of the murderers’ race is known..

    There’s too much wiggle room here. Those who have had intimate contact with negroes will know that most unknowns are negroes and the actual percentage is more likely 75-80% of all murders. Goodthinkers will argue as in paragraph one above.

  121. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

    That’s why gardeners are always finding murdered corpses in shallow graves in Lexington, Scarsdale, and Palo Alto.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    @Steve Sailer

    Steve, a serial killer in Toronto, who did landscaping, buried his victim's bodies in planters on a clients patio and in her back yard. Numerous victims.

  122. @Buzz Mohawk
    @Steve Sailer


    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?
     
    Gee. Wow. We dunno. What's the point of asking the question if you don't know about it at all? Such gossip is interesting, but really, Steve, what's your point? Please, elaborate.

    There are those of us who would have schtupped with Ms. Graham just because she was Ms. Graham. That includes me.

    BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)

    Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    “BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)”

    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?

    • Replies: @Chris Renner
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)


    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?
     
    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn't have to be physically inserted into the car's ignition for the car to start.

    By design it's only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what's called a "relay attack" in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).

    Replies: @Clyde

  123. Tex says:
    @Rob McX
    @Steve Sailer

    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there's a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they're less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.

    Replies: @Tex

    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there’s a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they’re less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.

    The only direct info I have on that subject runs a little different. A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. “Last week’s victim is next week’s perp.” Typical cases run like this, a guy is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever some unknown person takes a shot at him.

    Everyone in the neighborhood knows it was some other guy who had a beef over something or other. But, no one will tell the cops and gossip isn’t a good basis for a warrant.

    So next week, the other guy is is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever someone takes a shot at him. This pattern repeats until one or the other improves his aim. Then the cops have a pretty good chance of nailing the guy. But there’s always next week at 2 AM…

    • Replies: @Rob McX
    @Tex


    A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. “Last week’s victim is next week’s perp.”
     
    Come to think of it, that's another reason why there could be a lot of black murderers whose crimes have never been solved - they get killed before they can be caught.

    Replies: @John Up North

  124. @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    Did Warren Buffett have an affair with Katharine Graham, the famous owner-publisher of the Washington Post during Watergate days?

    Replies: @anon, @Buzz Mohawk, @anon

    Buffett had an unusually close relationship with Graham. Buffett is simply not a very sexual guy. He is definitely on the spectrum.

    He has been popular for his money for long enough to recognize it, and is wary regarding attention from women.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    The mainstream media seems to portray the Warren Buffett - Katharine Graham relationship as simply "flirtatious." But I don't believe that's how adults behave.

  125. jon says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
    OT

    Billy the Kid has been, all the time, a naughty lecher. Who would have thought ....

    https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-image-likable-nerdy-philanthropist-fell-apart-2021-5

    Bill Gates crafted a public image as a likable, nerdy do-gooder. Office affairs, 'uncomfortable' workplace behavior, and Epstein ties reveal cracks in his facade.

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/30/70/4530701092876dc0d3f7db873fc19463.gif

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @jon

    The Gates downfall seems very coordinated. It kind of reminds me of Weinstein. You have a rich, powerful person who is able to put forth this false, crafted image of who they are, seemingly forever. Then it all very suddenly comes crashing down, and the shit bag is revealed. And when it is, we find out that everyone around the person knew all of the dirt the whole time, but nobody ever said anything.
    These don’t feel organic; the idea that one person coming forward, or one part of the story coming out releases the flood gates. It feels a lot more like these people being burned by the other shit bags, their protection suddenly being removed. I wonder what Gates did to get kicked out of the club?

    • Agree: res
    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @jon

    In case like this, the coordination is usually done by lawyers. I presume Mrs. Gates is paying an extremely competent divorce lawyer to smear Mr. Gates.

    Replies: @Truth

    , @Ed
    @jon

    Obviously someone in the wife’s camp, lawyers, friends or family, is leaking the material. WSJ is reporting he transferred nearly $1B of stock in Deere & about $3B in stock overall since they have announced the filing in May.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-gates-transfers-850-million-in-deere-shares-to-melinda-french-gates-11621357742

  126. Tex says:
    @RichardTaylor
    A comedian on Joe Rogan talked about the rough time he had with some homeless black thugs in Austin. It looks like the "well behaved" white liberal yuppies are brining destruction to yet another city. White Flight continues as long as anti-White policies are in effect.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1eZxsPZZcE

    Replies: @FPD72, @Tex

    In my experience, the issue with the homeless in Austin is less about race than general mental problems. A lot of the vagrants are psychotic. Another bunch are whacked out on drugs. There are shantytowns in various directions a few blocks from my work. Encountering a psychotic vagrant acting aggressively is pretty common. It’s sort of like running across a grenade with the pin 3/4 of the way out. Fool with it and it may go off. Leave it along and it may go off too.

    Move north a few blocks to the Capitol area, and it’s quite different. DPS is much more present and effective. The building I work in has police as well as civilian security, but there’s only so much area they can cover.

    Not to say that thug vagrants are not a problem, but I make an effort to limit my exposure to downtown Austin so I may not see their patterns as much. There was a rather droll fellow (a big black dude) in a nearby park that would hold forth to the other vagrants on the Jewish Question.

    Best recent overheard vagrant comment, from an old black woman on the steps of the Dickenson House, “I wasn’t born in China. I wasn’t born in Africa. I wasn’t born in America. I was born in Philadelphia!”

  127. @jon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Gates downfall seems very coordinated. It kind of reminds me of Weinstein. You have a rich, powerful person who is able to put forth this false, crafted image of who they are, seemingly forever. Then it all very suddenly comes crashing down, and the shit bag is revealed. And when it is, we find out that everyone around the person knew all of the dirt the whole time, but nobody ever said anything.
    These don't feel organic; the idea that one person coming forward, or one part of the story coming out releases the flood gates. It feels a lot more like these people being burned by the other shit bags, their protection suddenly being removed. I wonder what Gates did to get kicked out of the club?

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Ed

    In case like this, the coordination is usually done by lawyers. I presume Mrs. Gates is paying an extremely competent divorce lawyer to smear Mr. Gates.

    • Replies: @Truth
    @Steve Sailer

    Again, this is a low-IQ honeytrap with a few different "Actors"

    https://www.nairaland.com/attachments/12055357_gatesdouble_jpg70977e25a0780dd35d6b1eb2aeb599ee

    https://gab.com/hmakow/posts/106212882885065615

    There was no "marriage" simply a script.

  128. @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    Buffett had an unusually close relationship with Graham. Buffett is simply not a very sexual guy. He is definitely on the spectrum.

    He has been popular for his money for long enough to recognize it, and is wary regarding attention from women.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    The mainstream media seems to portray the Warren Buffett – Katharine Graham relationship as simply “flirtatious.” But I don’t believe that’s how adults behave.

  129. @Steve Sailer
    @Anon

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home 'hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don't charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It's like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    Replies: @John Up North, @Morton's toes, @gutta percha, @Desiderius

    Harrison is way too slick an operator to get the actual blood on his hands. See the Rookie camp lecture where they are told always have a guy in your posse who can take the rap. I almost think OJ didn’t do it and there was some kind of weird fix on him because he is definitely smart enough that he could get away with it like Harrison or Ray Lewis.

  130. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    Major scam of Mexicans. Have baby here. Work off the books but DECLARE $3500 income. You’re family is now eligible for complete welfare benefits. Probably about $30k worth. Plus $30k cash income.
    Hay Chihuahua!!!!

  131. @Almost Missouri
    @Anon

    Since most murders are unsolved nowadays and black murders ("snitches get stitches") tend to go unsolved more often, and stranger murders are less solved (which inter-racial murders are more likely to be stranger murders), yes, the unknown murder offenders likely skew even more black than the known murder offenders. So the true figure is probably more like "13% does 60% or 70%."

    As I've been saying, most US social problems are really race problems. Until we can face that fact, no social problem will be solved.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Triteleia Laxa, @JohnPlywood, @Bucky, @res, @ScarletNumber

    black murders (“snitches get stitches”) tend to go unsolved more often

    Not only that, they tend to look alike, so much so that facial recognition software is having a tough time. 60 Minutes had a piece on it a few weeks ago, of course featuring some black guys who were arrested and legitimately dindu nuffin.

  132. Anonymous[286] • Disclaimer says:
    @Clyde
    @West reanimator

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.


    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.
     
    Of course I saw this about Reagan's second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today. Look at the graph again (w all due respect)
    Translation-- "You don't know what you got 'till its gone" -- Joni Mitchell
    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone! This is how the ChiComs can be moving in today to neutralize us and prevail. And I saw this all happen. Patrick Buchanan warned us starting in 1988!

    If you are young and want a South African situation, then you are getting it and our blacks never even mined gold and diamonds for our elites that trickled down some to the South African white plebs. Just some effin southern states cotton. Picked and processed by our now useless blacks. Cotton that was mostly shipped to Great Britain where when woven into textiles would have 500% value added to it. 500% is my guess-timate

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @silviosilver

    Of course I saw this about Reagan’s second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today.

    An equally interesting question is what were the rates of black violence pre-1970s? What were they like during Jim Crow and in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s?

  133. @George Taylor
    Another Sailor rule of mass shootings in Oakland. Check out all bullet holes in this bus, plus all the little white tags for shell casing. Just another day in Oakland. https://youtu.be/VANLIXGOsKg

    Replies: @Farenheit, @Buffalo Joe

    It’s called “Oaktown” for a reason!

  134. @peterike
    @Almost Missouri


    the black portion of the population has been on an upward tear since 1930

     

    Indeed. The only reason the percentage of blacks stays kind of the same is that we're flooding the nation with even more non-black people of color. But the percentage of the black population is nearly meaningless compared to the TOTAL number of blacks.

    The United States has a finite amount of space. The available living space now contains more blacks than ever before. And that's why it feels like there are a lot more blacks around where there didn't used to be 10 or 20 years ago. Because there's LOTS and LOTS more of them. And various government actions are spreading them around. They have to go someplace. And the place they're going to is a nice white neighborhood near you.

    Replies: @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    True, and the other part of the equation is the number of whites. Since the number of whites is actually declining so the ratio of whites to Blacks has gone from 6 to 1 in 1990 to 4 to 1 today.

    • Replies: @Polistra
    @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Was close to 9:1 back in 1960, right? Gotta love that trend!

    Soon we'll be at parity, then we all have big party.

  135. jon says:
    @Anonymous
    @Elli


    In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races
     
    What is the significance of that?

    Replies: @jon, @Brandt

    What is the significance of that?

    For black victims with a known murderer, only about 10% of the perps are non-black. So a good rough estimate would be that around 90% of the unsolved murders of blacks are also done by blacks. You can tweak it a little from there, depending how you try to estimate if unknown murderers are more or less likely to be black.

  136. @Dr. X
    @Redneck farmer

    Half? Based on the commercials I see, blacks must be at least 75% of the population.

    Replies: @profnasty

    Blacks are being primed for a guerilla war against Whites. It’s dry tinder now. All the ‘Usual Suspects’ have to do is add gasoline and a match.
    And don’t forget, the US Military is now Black.
    [Support your local Sheriff.]

  137. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.

    It’s nonsense. There isn’t a factor of seven or eight difference in fatherlessness. Not anymore.

    But more on point, all the minoritarian “sociology” attempts to blame this or that–“poverty”, “socio-economic status”, “education”, “fatherlessness”–miss the point. Blacks simply generate a lot more of the above. That’s they are the source–the generators–of these conditions not passive victims.

    And when it comes to criminal violence the data show–as Steve has posted a time or two–that even if you skim off the “black cream”–economically or educationally–already a smaller slice, you still end up with blacks being significantly more criminally violent. Levels akin the bottom rung of the measures for whites.

  138. @Tex
    @Rob McX


    But it has to be said that a huge proportion of black killers are stupid and/or careless, as your law of mass shootings indicates. Even when there’s a chance of committing a crime with impunity, they blow it by leaving evidence all over the place. Also, a lot of black criminals do snitch on their fellows when they get behind the closed doors of a police station, in the hope of getting reduced jail time in exchange, although they’re less likely to follow it up by testifying in court.
     
    The only direct info I have on that subject runs a little different. A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. "Last week's victim is next week's perp." Typical cases run like this, a guy is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever some unknown person takes a shot at him.

    Everyone in the neighborhood knows it was some other guy who had a beef over something or other. But, no one will tell the cops and gossip isn't a good basis for a warrant.

    So next week, the other guy is is minding his own business, hanging on the corner at 2 A.M., when suddenly for no reason whatsoever someone takes a shot at him. This pattern repeats until one or the other improves his aim. Then the cops have a pretty good chance of nailing the guy. But there's always next week at 2 AM...

    Replies: @Rob McX

    A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. “Last week’s victim is next week’s perp.”

    Come to think of it, that’s another reason why there could be a lot of black murderers whose crimes have never been solved – they get killed before they can be caught.

    • Replies: @John Up North
    @Rob McX

    Living in any big American city it's frightening to think of all the stone cold black killers wandering around with absolutely no inhibitions about murdering anyone who even looks at them.

  139. The question we should be asking is why has the public image of both Gates & Fauci been imploded simultaneously. Has the serious money just now had an epiphany about the results of the lockdowns and welfare spending?

    • Replies: @Travis
    @Stan D Mute

    often the truth can no longer be hidden and people realize they have been lied to. The Truth will eventual reveal itself and Fauci will be exposed as an evil man who helped destroy America with his lies.

    Nobody ever liked Bill Gates. He has been despised for decades but was able to use his wealth to buy media praise. With a pending divorce the press and media can see a better gravy train coming from Melinda Gates so it makes sense to attack Bill and start taking payments from Melinda. It is clear she filed has filed for divorce and was smart to start planting the Gates-Epstein stories to discredit her Husband and make him look like the bad guy. Women are very vindictive when they end relationships. She will spend billions to destroy Bill Gates for cheating on her. Hell hath no Fury like a woman scorned.

    Replies: @Truth

  140. Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Anonymous Jew


    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.
     
    Descendants of American slaves (DOAS) may not be a representative sample of the Bantu population at large. How did they come to be enslaved in Africa and then disposed of in the first place?

    Replies: @Anonymous Jew

    , @Colin Wright
    @Anonymous Jew

    'Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.'

    I've looked at the U.K. Tediously, like here: the ratio is about 8:1, depending on what one looks at.

    , @silviosilver
    @Anonymous Jew

    I saw a stat a couple of months ago on London, where blacks are 13% of the population but responsible for 46% of one of (I forget which) violent crime/knife crime/murder. We had a laugh on twitter about 13/50 being some "criminological constant."

    Stats I've seen for Brazil had blacks at a minimum 2:1 more criminal (ie based on my memory, it might have been higher). Of course, the proviso there is that plenty of the "non-blacks" in those stats would qualify as blacks by American standards, so the real ratio is possibly higher.

  141. @Rob McX
    @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco

    Shows like that have been around for a long time, but they often tried to feature a disproportionately high number of white killers. A lot of people probably prefer watching shows about whites anyway, because murders by blacks are so monotonously stupid and depressing.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @Feryl

    Plus white criminals can spin intricate webs, and often can affect something resembling a normal life. But there are few cunning black criminals, most are blunt and obnoxious.

  142. Anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous Jew
    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.

    Replies: @Anon, @Colin Wright, @silviosilver

    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.

    Descendants of American slaves (DOAS) may not be a representative sample of the Bantu population at large. How did they come to be enslaved in Africa and then disposed of in the first place?

    • Replies: @Anonymous Jew
    @Anon

    True, but there’s also regression to the mean, selective pressures since arriving and White admixture. My impression is that Bantus everywhere are remarkably similar - as with any other race. That doesn’t mean there aren’t regional differences (say the kind observed between Italians and Danes). It’s just that standing next to Whites and Asians the similarities of various Bantu populations seem obvious. I recall reading a story by an African aide worker who was surprised to find so many similarities between DOAS and SSA in Africa.

  143. @Shouting Thomas
    White victims of black crime had best keep their mouths shut. Their own families, employers and community will turn against them if they don’t.

    My liberal extended family reacted angrily when I began to relate to them the story of how black gangs constantly threatened, attacked and finally drove my family out of Brooklyn during the crack epidemic. They just wanted me to shut up about it. Soon, they were calling me a bigot. My relationship with my sisters collapsed over this.

    A special ed teacher friend of mine was attacked and severely beaten in her classroom by a black kid. The school board and the teacher’s union turned against her and denounced her as a racist for seeking compensation and redress. They accused her of provoking the attack. She did win a lawsuit against the school district but has been blacklisted out of the teaching profession.

    One of the reasons you don’t hear much about white victims of black violence is that those victims learn to keep their mouths shut.

    Replies: @Alden

    The majority of people who are injured at work are fired because the employer’s Wcom insurance company has to pay for medical care and lost wages, sometimes permanent disability.

    It’s illegal to fire someone because of a Wcom claim. But it usually happens.

    What happened to the teacher is standard procedure. It’s the injured worker’s attorney against the employer and the Wcom insurance company’s attorneys and endless hearings depositions and testimony before medical treatment is authorized.. And the injured worker is usually fired, harassed until he or she leaves and is blacklisted.

  144. @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.

    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites. Yet black crime was higher by about the same proportion relative to whites in that era. As Marty pointed out earlier, crime began skyrocketing in the 60’s as crime rate per capita went up, while incarceration per crime went down. Such are the fruits of permissiveness in the criminal justice system. That murder per capita is the one crime that hasn’t gone up since the sixties is largely a tribute to a combo of massaging the numbers (exemplified – for a non-murder stat – by “suicide by cop” being used by the FBI to characterize the attempting mass killing of GOP House Reps several years ago) and great leaps in emergency department medical care re injuries that would have been fatal prior to those advances.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    @Johann Ricke


    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.
     
    Horsecrap.

    Replies: @Johann Ricke

  145. @Steve Sailer
    @jon

    In case like this, the coordination is usually done by lawyers. I presume Mrs. Gates is paying an extremely competent divorce lawyer to smear Mr. Gates.

    Replies: @Truth

    Again, this is a low-IQ honeytrap with a few different “Actors”

    https://www.nairaland.com/attachments/12055357_gatesdouble_jpg70977e25a0780dd35d6b1eb2aeb599ee

    https://gab.com/hmakow/posts/106212882885065615

    There was no “marriage” simply a script.

  146. @res
    @Almost Missouri

    It's good to see that JohnPlywood has joined Corvinus in offering his seal of approval (Disagree or Troll flag) to good comments.

    Thanks, John. It makes those good comments easier to find.

    Replies: @Alfa158, @Corvinus

    Plywood is Tiny Duck. Look at the comments and you see that he uses the Duck signature which is deliberately inserting little typing errors and malapropisms to let us know is playing a humorous role. Although, I’m a little disappointed that he hasn’t given us a real howler since he used the edgy “whites must give up their primates” line a couple of weeks ago.
    I think Corvinus is actually a serious commenter, Duck is just making fun of people who really think like him.

  147. @Rob McX
    @Tex


    A veteran homicide cop broke it down for me. “Last week’s victim is next week’s perp.”
     
    Come to think of it, that's another reason why there could be a lot of black murderers whose crimes have never been solved - they get killed before they can be caught.

    Replies: @John Up North

    Living in any big American city it’s frightening to think of all the stone cold black killers wandering around with absolutely no inhibitions about murdering anyone who even looks at them.

  148. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Well, you got me there. There’s no rational rebuttal to being called a maggot. I concede that you’re a better name-caller than I’ll ever be.

  149. @Anon
    @Anon

    The first question asked by old-time Wild West sheriffs upon arriving at a murder scene was, “Did he need killing?”

    I know this is a topic never discussed but what percentage of the “victims” of murder needed killing? I imagine there many scenarios where a serious threat or problem in a crowded, dysfunctional, inner-city environment can only be resolved extrajudicially.

    Relatedly, I think many of petty reasons given for a murder (argued over a TV remote, “he disrespected me”, etc.) are BS cover stories to hide the real reason— which can’t be discussed in an anti-snitch, don’t-put-my-bidness-out-on-da-street culture.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Rooster11

    I think you’re onto something. People always bemoan the unsolved homicide cases, but in respect to the inner cities, many of the police departments/homicide detectives know who the bad actors are. Unless there’s some egregious evidence they simply cannot ignore, I’m sure they chalk quite a few murders up to “cost of doing business” for the feral thugs. Anyways, in a majority black area, there’s always more than enough crime and other cases that they can focus their energy on like solving the random shootings of children. Why throw good money after bad, on guys no one cares are dead.

  150. @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Buzz Mohawk

    "BTW, park your car in the garage. (And if you have a keyless entry/starting fob, keep it at the other end of your house.)"

    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?

    Replies: @Chris Renner

    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?

    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.

    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Chris Renner


    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.
    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).
     
    I have a 2016 Honda with nice electronic entry/locking but it is attched to a key I must use in the ingition. Same year as my car, but the upgraded editions came with keyless fobs. I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button? Is this what upper crust women wank over? Is this the Japs/Koreans showing the world how gay their engineers and "visionairies" are? Oooppps, by now this keyless fag fob has probably spread to what is made here and in Europe.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @JMcG, @Chris Renner

  151. I think you should use a LOESS smoothing function rather than linear regression.

  152. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

    ‘No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.’

    I doubt it. Disproportionately, what white murders there are are going to fall into the ‘in eighty percent of all homicides, the killer knows the victim’ category. It’s not going to be hard to figure out who killed Mrs. Brown if the neighbors heard Mr. and Mrs. Brown fighting loudly every night.

    Your basic white homicide is like that the father of my daughter’s boyfriend witnessed. Two neighbors started arguing, then one got a gun and killed the other. Stupid — but not hard to solve.

    Disproportionately, it’s blacks who murder total strangers for no reason at all. That’s why blacks disproportionately receive the death penalty. They’re the ones who commit the killings for which there was no excuse at all.

    So black stupidity and carelessness notwithstanding, disproportionately it’s blacks who were the unknown assailant who shot and killed that cab driver or whatever. For all their faults, a non-black would be highly unlikely to commit such a crime.

    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
    @Colin Wright

    Laugbable, you just said they average white murder was impulsive. They aren't. Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Boomthorkell

    , @JohnnyWalker123
    @Colin Wright

    White homicides seem to usually involve family members. A cheating husband gets killed by the angry wife. A drug-addicted son murders his parents for money. That sort of thing. The murderer is almost always identified rather quickly.

    Black homicides are often domestic situations, but many involve a bunch of local tough guys fighting at a party. Then someone opens fire and runs away. Or a drive-by shooting occurs at night, with the perpetrator fleeing under the cover of darkness. Those cases are harder to solve, especially if no one talks.

    White mafia homicides are often not solved, but the mafia families have mostly faded away in recent decades. So that might be a rare exception.

  153. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

    ‘I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.’

    I like how those on the Left so consistently parade their utter intolerance and hostility to anyone who fails to toe their intellectual line.

    Nature’s Fascists — they’re always with us, eh? Sometimes one name, sometimes another — but always with us.

  154. @Truth
    @JohnnyWalker123

    So, a lifetime talking head who has never passed a piece of legislation in his life, and has no allies in congress is your next hope to save the conservatives party (white people)?

    After all, that worked so well from 2016-2020.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    who has never passed a piece of legislation in his life…

    That’s a feature, not a bug.

  155. @Anonymous Jew
    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.

    Replies: @Anon, @Colin Wright, @silviosilver

    ‘Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.’

    I’ve looked at the U.K. Tediously, like here: the ratio is about 8:1, depending on what one looks at.

  156. res says:
    @Steve Sailer
    @gent

    I will have to find a year by year share of population table, ideally by age.

    Replies: @res

    This document is a good start for 1960-1997.
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/pop6097.pdf
    Unfortunately the data is in inconvenient tables and would take some work to extract.

    This 1900-1959 data only has whites and “all other”, but still might be useful.
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/pop0059.pdf

    2000 census
    https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2000/dec/phc-t-09.html

    They have a variety of data in Excel/PDF/TXT. Table 1 looks like the one you want.
    http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/2000/phc/phc-t-09/tab01.pdf

    Annual estimates 2010-2019
    https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2020/population-estimates-detailed.html

  157. res says:
    @Jack D
    @Clyde

    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:


    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     
    But, as far as I can tell, ZERO is being done to discourage single motherhood in the black community or indeed anywhere. It's more popular among all groups. The stigma has disappeared. Isn't this the exact WRONG thing to be doing, and yet no one is making any efforts to reverse this?
    The State loves absent fathers because stepping in to act as the missing parent provides lots of employment and spending opportunities for Democrat constituencies - social worker ladies, welfare officials, etc. Feminists would just as well get rid of men completely - they're just a bunch of rapists. Hollywood starlets have kids out of wedlock (or get divorced five minutes after their kids are born) and they have lots of money to make up for absent dad with nannies, shrinks, etc. but the ghetto mom has no such resources except for the gubmint.

    Among ghetto blacks, intact two parent families are the exception, not the rule. It doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a mother and a father. The reason you need a whole "village" is that dad is not around and so half of the equation is missing at home and the community is somehow supposed to make up for it.

    Replies: @gent, @Zoos, @new Stalin, @Buzz Mohawk, @profnasty, @AnotherDad, @Johann Ricke, @res

    That factoid needs a real citation. Did the Quora answer give one? Because as AnotherDad noted, the ratio is not anything like 7:1 in the current year.

    This page gives children in single parent families in 2019 as 24% for whites and 64% for blacks.
    https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race

    That aside, the rest of your comment seems on target.

  158. @JohnPlywood
    @Almost Missouri

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders, you stupid fuck, and stranger murders are more likely to be interracial (logically), but interracial murders aren't significantly more likely to be stranger murders.


    Imagine being as low-IQ and hysterical as this fucking cuck, "almost missouri".

    Replies: @rebel yell, @Whiskey, @Mike Tre

    The sad thing is that you really seem to believe that “Murder She Wrote” and “Columbo” were documentaries. A blind, willful denial of reality does not reflect well upon you.

    Whites murder a lot less than every other race than Asians. This is born out in study after study, including Heather McDonald’s analysis of the NYPD murder and shooting investigations which were very detailed. Indeed Whites are known for being far more reluctant to kill than blacks. SLA Marshall’s study which has been verified by John Keegan shows that in WWII, most soldiers were reluctant to fire so ingrained were the taboos against killing. Similar results were shown in Vietnam, Korea, etc. A small minority of the men did the bulk of the firing and killing. Better and more realistic training and deployment (with those they trained with) after Vietnam resulted in more lethality in the Gulf War, Iraq War and Afghanistan though the latter two were different than WWII.

    Whites are older, more middle class, and upper class than blacks. That alone makes them less likely to kill. But there is a deeper reason — eugenics. For the past 2000 years plus, every king, emperor, bishop-elector, prince, lord, and the like has been busy executing thieves, murderers, cut-throats, bandits, pirates and the like of every description. More in some places, less in others, but all across Europe. First such men were direct threats to the ruler, given the tendency of bandit leaders to gather dissatisfied men at arms. Second, they victimized peasants. A dead peasant would not pay taxes, and if he had not fathered children, neither would his non existent heirs. Nor would he give service. And taxes could not be collected from a peasant robbed and left with nothing. Lords who left their peasants to the mercies of the bandits could be replaced by a lord above them wanting labor or military levies and finding … only graveyards. For blacks it is the reverse, their entire environment has been towards keeping it real.

    [MORE]

    Next is the type of murder that is “unsolved.” While contract murders may leave no direct physical evidence pointing to the one hiring, and they do happen rarely, like tornadoes in Salt Lake City, police generally have well established suspicions: family members, business partners, etc. and someone generally talks. These are also quite rare — the type of person who thinks its a smart idea to kill a family member or business partner tends not to last long in middle and upper class society. Those who do are the very limited number of organized crime figures like Gotti or Whitey Bulger, generally protected by various organizations (the mob, the FBI for Bulger). Others tend to get caught sooner or later (generally sooner) and are quite rare.

    What is not rare is the type of murder commited by blacks that is unsolved. Jill Leovy went over this in Ghettocide. A car rolls up, shots are fired (almost always from a revolver). A person is dead, no witness will testify (for fear of gang retaliation and they are tied to the neighborhood). There are generally few if any working street cameras. No license plate, no description, no physical evidence save a deformed bullet. The gun is generally immediately traded away to another gang for money/drugs etc. No brass on the floor of the car as its a revolver. Much the same can happen and has happened in real life shootings of ordinary black men and women in the ghetto who were not gang members. Merely targets in the neighborhood.

    THAT is the type of crime that does not happen every five years in the entire country, but every day in black ghettos. There is basically no evidence for police to process. No witnesses (none that will testify or even inform). Drug cases are used to proxy prosecute likely murderers. Its not exact. Very many murderers get off — clearance rates of homicides in Detroit is below 50%, as it is in Baltimore, Chicago, and most of South-Central Los Angeles (the rest of the city WAS higher before BLM). Clearance as in there was a suspect charged, not even conviction. Even if charges are dropped later, it still counts as cleared. Not even 50% of black murderers get charged by act (likely most black murderers charged have multiple counts never charged).

    Given the abysmal clearance rates of homicides in most black cities, I would put the rate of homicides committed by black people at about 80-85%. Its that bad.

    Again, I’m not shocked you believe in fantasy and don’t want to face the facts of race, violence and crime. Most people don’t and want pretty lies about ass kicking babes, wise black women, and the like.

  159. @Chris Renner
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)


    Why keep the fob far from the garage? Why not in your pocket?
     
    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn't have to be physically inserted into the car's ignition for the car to start.

    By design it's only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what's called a "relay attack" in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).

    Replies: @Clyde

    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.
    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).

    I have a 2016 Honda with nice electronic entry/locking but it is attched to a key I must use in the ingition. Same year as my car, but the upgraded editions came with keyless fobs. I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button? Is this what upper crust women wank over? Is this the Japs/Koreans showing the world how gay their engineers and “visionairies” are? Oooppps, by now this keyless fag fob has probably spread to what is made here and in Europe.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Clyde


    I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button?
     

    Your electronic key is more secure, so don't worry. Chris Renner correctly described my concerns with the other type, which I have for my 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

    You see, even Americans are putting them on Jeeps now, and I love it! I think it's great, so call me gay. (That's been happening around here anyway since people found out I make friends with actors. LOL)

    I've had German cars with your system for twenty years, BMWs and Mercedes-Benzes. You have to stick the key in to start the engine. On our Benz, it's not really a key; it's electronic and doesn't have anything on it a locksmith would recognize, but still it has to be inserted and turned.

    Keyless pushbuttons are here to say, on every variety of vehicle from every car-making country I bet. I very much like the system. Just don't leave that fob near your car overnight while you are sleeping, or at least leave it in a Faraday box or inside some aluminum foil. Otherwise, you see, anybody with the right amplifying equipment can come near your car, open it and start it using the signal from your fob.

    Replies: @Clyde

    , @JMcG
    @Clyde

    All those WWII jeeps and most cool airplanes have a starter button. Some cool airplanes need to be hand propped. That separates the men from the boys.
    I know, I know; a key is required to energize the electrical system, but a nice stout button does the business.

    , @Chris Renner
    @Clyde

    I assume your key looks something like this one? If so, your key isn't the type that adds risk; it does have an electronic transponder but that transponder is unpowered - the battery in the remote is there only for the keyless entry - and can't be read by the car unless it's within a couple inches of the ignition.

    The keys that look like this one present the security risk.

    Replies: @Clyde

  160. @Clyde
    @Chris Renner


    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.
    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).
     
    I have a 2016 Honda with nice electronic entry/locking but it is attched to a key I must use in the ingition. Same year as my car, but the upgraded editions came with keyless fobs. I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button? Is this what upper crust women wank over? Is this the Japs/Koreans showing the world how gay their engineers and "visionairies" are? Oooppps, by now this keyless fag fob has probably spread to what is made here and in Europe.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @JMcG, @Chris Renner

    I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button?

    Your electronic key is more secure, so don’t worry. Chris Renner correctly described my concerns with the other type, which I have for my 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

    [MORE]

    You see, even Americans are putting them on Jeeps now, and I love it! I think it’s great, so call me gay. (That’s been happening around here anyway since people found out I make friends with actors. LOL)

    I’ve had German cars with your system for twenty years, BMWs and Mercedes-Benzes. You have to stick the key in to start the engine. On our Benz, it’s not really a key; it’s electronic and doesn’t have anything on it a locksmith would recognize, but still it has to be inserted and turned.

    Keyless pushbuttons are here to say, on every variety of vehicle from every car-making country I bet. I very much like the system. Just don’t leave that fob near your car overnight while you are sleeping, or at least leave it in a Faraday box or inside some aluminum foil. Otherwise, you see, anybody with the right amplifying equipment can come near your car, open it and start it using the signal from your fob.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Many thanks. For sure keyless fobs are here to stay. I really do think they are ridiculous and gay and female driven. I like something larger which is an ignition key with transponder. Much more visible and harder to misplace. I have my ignition key/transponder attached to the normal size Red Swiss Army knife. Happens to be the camper model and I have four more anyways in a drawer. I like Swiss Army knives. But for anyone and you I would say at minimum attach your fob to the smaller kind of Swiss Army knife. The mini-model. Ebay has tons of them new and used. Get red of course! You can never tell when you might need to use it.

    Ebay is where I bought my most recent Red Camper --- https://tinyurl.com/3x6x9uzz ---, which is vintage and has some German inscription on it that I must translate. This one is ringed onto to my ignition key/transponder.

  161. Ed says:
    @Dan Smith
    Watch a few dozen episodes of the popular A&E reality show First 48. Overwhelming majority of the murders are committed by blacks against blacks. Motives: robberies, disrespect, eliminating witnesses. Rarely a crime of passion. I’m shocked the show is still on the air.

    Replies: @donut, @Ed

    The show remains on air but the cities willing to work with the show have dwindled. That’s why they’re reduced to cities such as Tulsa and Mobile. Black cities like Detroit and Memphis have cancelled cooperation with production due to image issues.

    Still funny how Live PD was cancelled during the George Floyd hysteria. There’s a movement to bring it back but it’s unlikely.

  162. @jon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Gates downfall seems very coordinated. It kind of reminds me of Weinstein. You have a rich, powerful person who is able to put forth this false, crafted image of who they are, seemingly forever. Then it all very suddenly comes crashing down, and the shit bag is revealed. And when it is, we find out that everyone around the person knew all of the dirt the whole time, but nobody ever said anything.
    These don't feel organic; the idea that one person coming forward, or one part of the story coming out releases the flood gates. It feels a lot more like these people being burned by the other shit bags, their protection suddenly being removed. I wonder what Gates did to get kicked out of the club?

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Ed

    Obviously someone in the wife’s camp, lawyers, friends or family, is leaking the material. WSJ is reporting he transferred nearly $1B of stock in Deere & about $3B in stock overall since they have announced the filing in May.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-gates-transfers-850-million-in-deere-shares-to-melinda-french-gates-11621357742

  163. @Steve Sailer
    @Clyde

    Crack started showing up in LA and NYC around 1986. Crack was a really, really bad invention.

    Replies: @Clyde, @John Up North, @Redman

    Tell that to Hunter Biden.

  164. Alan King in London, circa 1987: “Our number one comedian on TV is Bill Cosby, a black! Our number one comedian in movies is Eddie Murphy, a black! Our number one comedian in concerts and recordings is Richard Pryor, a black! Now — where are your great Pakistani comedians?”

  165. @Clyde
    @Chris Renner


    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.
    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).
     
    I have a 2016 Honda with nice electronic entry/locking but it is attched to a key I must use in the ingition. Same year as my car, but the upgraded editions came with keyless fobs. I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button? Is this what upper crust women wank over? Is this the Japs/Koreans showing the world how gay their engineers and "visionairies" are? Oooppps, by now this keyless fag fob has probably spread to what is made here and in Europe.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @JMcG, @Chris Renner

    All those WWII jeeps and most cool airplanes have a starter button. Some cool airplanes need to be hand propped. That separates the men from the boys.
    I know, I know; a key is required to energize the electrical system, but a nice stout button does the business.

  166. @AnonymousNameChange
    Hey Steve, if you're interested I'd very much like to hear your take/parsing of the Biden Admin's plan to start cutting checks to families and other pro-natalist policies. Seems hardly coincidental that this is only happening after the demographic tipping point has been reached, but I haven't seen anyone make any hay of it.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    I’d very much like to hear your take/parsing of the Biden Admin’s plan to start cutting checks to families and other pro-natalist policies.

    I don’t think the purpose is a pro-natalist policy. I think it’s a pro-not-losing-the-House-in-the-midterms policy. Joe is pumping out Biden Bucks to buy votes and keep the economy going until his policies have their inevitable consequences.

  167. @Clyde
    @Chris Renner


    The whole point of a keyless fob is that it doesn’t have to be physically inserted into the car’s ignition for the car to start.
    By design it’s only supposed to have a range of a few feet, but thieves will do what’s called a “relay attack” in order to extend that range substantially. Moving the keyless fob farther away helps to thwart this (though not as much as keeping it in a Faraday box or wrapping it in aluminum foil will do).
     
    I have a 2016 Honda with nice electronic entry/locking but it is attched to a key I must use in the ingition. Same year as my car, but the upgraded editions came with keyless fobs. I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button? Is this what upper crust women wank over? Is this the Japs/Koreans showing the world how gay their engineers and "visionairies" are? Oooppps, by now this keyless fag fob has probably spread to what is made here and in Europe.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @JMcG, @Chris Renner

    I assume your key looks something like this one? If so, your key isn’t the type that adds risk; it does have an electronic transponder but that transponder is unpowered – the battery in the remote is there only for the keyless entry – and can’t be read by the car unless it’s within a couple inches of the ignition.

    The keys that look like this one present the security risk.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    @Chris Renner

    Many thanks! Yes what I have with my base model 2016 Honda is an ignition key/transponder combo. Now I am very glad I have this to start my car. Though I still will salivate over the fog lights that come with the more expensive editions. The ones that come with the keyless fobs.

  168. @Stan D Mute
    The question we should be asking is why has the public image of both Gates & Fauci been imploded simultaneously. Has the serious money just now had an epiphany about the results of the lockdowns and welfare spending?

    Replies: @Travis

    often the truth can no longer be hidden and people realize they have been lied to. The Truth will eventual reveal itself and Fauci will be exposed as an evil man who helped destroy America with his lies.

    Nobody ever liked Bill Gates. He has been despised for decades but was able to use his wealth to buy media praise. With a pending divorce the press and media can see a better gravy train coming from Melinda Gates so it makes sense to attack Bill and start taking payments from Melinda. It is clear she filed has filed for divorce and was smart to start planting the Gates-Epstein stories to discredit her Husband and make him look like the bad guy. Women are very vindictive when they end relationships. She will spend billions to destroy Bill Gates for cheating on her. Hell hath no Fury like a woman scorned.

    • Replies: @Truth
    @Travis


    Hell hath no Fury like a woman scorned.
     
    ?

    https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/93UnFV_a9T_Yf75IuP12lXVF1kQ=/0x0:647x486/1200x800/filters:focal(272x192:374x294)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63829850/melinda_gates_microsoft_e1556053803479.0.jpg
  169. @David In TN
    @Clyde

    Per Quora, "liberals" never run out of excuses and rationalizations for black criminality. As Lawrence Auster wrote, when all else fails just blame it on white people.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    As Lawrence Auster wrote, when all else fails just blame it on white people.

    Things have only gotten worse since Auster left the scene. It’s no longer “when all else fails,” but simply “always blame white people.”

  170. @Just another serf
    I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating.

    Anyway, the TV shows me many, many Black people, or people of color. They are all awesome. They are just sweet folks, really great people.

    So I’m not buying any of this blanket criticism that Steve Sailor keeps writing about. He could be a racist for all I know. Which is just awful and wrong.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @YetAnotherAnon, @anonymouseperson

    “I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating.”

    I had absolutely no idea my wife was posting here!

  171. @Buzz Mohawk
    @Clyde


    I hope my electronic key is a better idea as far as theft goes. Can you please comment on this?

    Just instinctively I dislike and disliked keyless fobs. What is more gay than an ignition button?
     

    Your electronic key is more secure, so don't worry. Chris Renner correctly described my concerns with the other type, which I have for my 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

    You see, even Americans are putting them on Jeeps now, and I love it! I think it's great, so call me gay. (That's been happening around here anyway since people found out I make friends with actors. LOL)

    I've had German cars with your system for twenty years, BMWs and Mercedes-Benzes. You have to stick the key in to start the engine. On our Benz, it's not really a key; it's electronic and doesn't have anything on it a locksmith would recognize, but still it has to be inserted and turned.

    Keyless pushbuttons are here to say, on every variety of vehicle from every car-making country I bet. I very much like the system. Just don't leave that fob near your car overnight while you are sleeping, or at least leave it in a Faraday box or inside some aluminum foil. Otherwise, you see, anybody with the right amplifying equipment can come near your car, open it and start it using the signal from your fob.

    Replies: @Clyde

    Many thanks. For sure keyless fobs are here to stay. I really do think they are ridiculous and gay and female driven. I like something larger which is an ignition key with transponder. Much more visible and harder to misplace. I have my ignition key/transponder attached to the normal size Red Swiss Army knife. Happens to be the camper model and I have four more anyways in a drawer. I like Swiss Army knives. But for anyone and you I would say at minimum attach your fob to the smaller kind of Swiss Army knife. The mini-model. Ebay has tons of them new and used. Get red of course! You can never tell when you might need to use it.

    Ebay is where I bought my most recent Red Camper — https://tinyurl.com/3x6x9uzz —, which is vintage and has some German inscription on it that I must translate. This one is ringed onto to my ignition key/transponder.

  172. @Chris Renner
    @Clyde

    I assume your key looks something like this one? If so, your key isn't the type that adds risk; it does have an electronic transponder but that transponder is unpowered - the battery in the remote is there only for the keyless entry - and can't be read by the car unless it's within a couple inches of the ignition.

    The keys that look like this one present the security risk.

    Replies: @Clyde

    Many thanks! Yes what I have with my base model 2016 Honda is an ignition key/transponder combo. Now I am very glad I have this to start my car. Though I still will salivate over the fog lights that come with the more expensive editions. The ones that come with the keyless fobs.

  173. Steve, those FBI statistics are skewed by the great deal of unsolved murders in America, the majority of which have a black victim but certainly not always. Perfect data don’t exist but if we had them I would predict an even higher share of total murders coming from that specific demographic.

  174. @Anonymous
    @Elli


    In 2017, 2018, 2019, there were
    13,560 black homicide victims killed by blacks,
    11,292 black victims killed by unknown race,
    1,425 black victims killed by all other races
     
    What is the significance of that?

    Replies: @jon, @Brandt

    The significance here is that of 26,277 blacks murdered 11,292 are unsolved, meaning all the stats are worthless

  175. My guess would be that blacks make up an overwhelming number of unknown murder offenders. Probably something like 90%.

  176. @Steve Sailer
    @Anon

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home 'hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don't charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It's like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    Replies: @John Up North, @Morton's toes, @gutta percha, @Desiderius

    “Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison …”

    I found a story about Harrison at GQ, but it is written in a bafflingly unreadable style, so I don’t know if it is the same story.

  177. @Anon
    @Anonymous Jew


    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.
     
    Descendants of American slaves (DOAS) may not be a representative sample of the Bantu population at large. How did they come to be enslaved in Africa and then disposed of in the first place?

    Replies: @Anonymous Jew

    True, but there’s also regression to the mean, selective pressures since arriving and White admixture. My impression is that Bantus everywhere are remarkably similar – as with any other race. That doesn’t mean there aren’t regional differences (say the kind observed between Italians and Danes). It’s just that standing next to Whites and Asians the similarities of various Bantu populations seem obvious. I recall reading a story by an African aide worker who was surprised to find so many similarities between DOAS and SSA in Africa.

  178. @Colin Wright
    @JohnPlywood

    'No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.'

    I doubt it. Disproportionately, what white murders there are are going to fall into the 'in eighty percent of all homicides, the killer knows the victim' category. It's not going to be hard to figure out who killed Mrs. Brown if the neighbors heard Mr. and Mrs. Brown fighting loudly every night.

    Your basic white homicide is like that the father of my daughter's boyfriend witnessed. Two neighbors started arguing, then one got a gun and killed the other. Stupid -- but not hard to solve.

    Disproportionately, it's blacks who murder total strangers for no reason at all. That's why blacks disproportionately receive the death penalty. They're the ones who commit the killings for which there was no excuse at all.

    So black stupidity and carelessness notwithstanding, disproportionately it's blacks who were the unknown assailant who shot and killed that cab driver or whatever. For all their faults, a non-black would be highly unlikely to commit such a crime.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood, @JohnnyWalker123

    Laugbable, you just said they average white murder was impulsive. They aren’t. Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @JohnPlywood


    Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.
     
    Not when you control for population.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @Boomthorkell
    @JohnPlywood

    If you think there are a fuck ton of white serial killers, you are a paranoid schizophrenic existing in a false reality. Quit deluding yourself. The staggering majority of people have never met a white serial killer, let alone been killed by one. The amount of white serial killers as a percentage of the population is so infinitesimal as to be irrelevant to anyone outside your strange, demented, lonely fantasies. Any white serial killer is a glitch in the system, or more likely, invented by your own strange fears and media-induced hallucinations. Go rewire your brain with a 12-gauge.

    Ha ha ha ha ha, man it's fun using this writing style. I totally get you, man. Of course, maybe you want to argue in proportional and relative populations. In this case, as Sailer pointed out before, Black serial killers appear to take the cake here. You may believe otherwise and are entitled to your faggot (sic) free speech on this issue, currently at least.

    Having said that, no matter how small the number of transexuals and serial killers (or transexual serial killers) is, it remains an issue that should be solved, and not blasted across media for people to be inspired by. Oh, I realize now I was referencing an earlier, exact opposite opinion you had on a similar subject. How interesting.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood

  179. @Steve Sailer
    @rebel yell

    A lot of murders committed by whites are domestics, which are usually solved. A fair number of murders committed by whites are solved by the murderer then shooting himself. White organized criminals generally don't shoot up block parties over feeling dissed. If the fate of Joe Pesci's character in "Goodfellas" is representative, white mobsters with that kind of personality don't last that long.

    Probably some white prison gang / biker types get away with murders at parties by intimidating witnesses, but it's a lot rarer than among gangstas.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @martin_2, @Bill Jones

    A clue to unsolved murders lies in the location. If in Vermont you’re probably looking for a white guy.
    Martin Luther King Blvd in say Phillie, probably not.

  180. @George Taylor
    Another Sailor rule of mass shootings in Oakland. Check out all bullet holes in this bus, plus all the little white tags for shell casing. Just another day in Oakland. https://youtu.be/VANLIXGOsKg

    Replies: @Farenheit, @Buffalo Joe

    George, in Etobicoke, Ontario, a Toronto suburb, a 100 rounds fired and one black dead, three wounded.

  181. @prosa123
    @CCZ

    That woman is pathetic. She made no attempt to defend herself. Fight back, for Christ's sakes.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

    prosa, I would bet she now uses the “n-word” when describing her opponent.

  182. @Steve Sailer
    @JohnPlywood

    That's why gardeners are always finding murdered corpses in shallow graves in Lexington, Scarsdale, and Palo Alto.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

    Steve, a serial killer in Toronto, who did landscaping, buried his victim’s bodies in planters on a clients patio and in her back yard. Numerous victims.

  183. Black Share of Known Murder Offenders

    [citation needed]

    You have no evidence that murder is offensive. It clearly isn’t. For blacks.

  184. @Steve Sailer
    @Anon

    Read up on the story about football hero Marvin Harrison retiring to his home 'hood to open a bar, and then the local neighborhood bad guy starts being a pest at the new bar, and he is found dead, and nobody misses him at all, and the cops don't charge the Hall of Famer because the dead guy needed some killing. It's like a Wild West dime novel about frontier justice.

    Replies: @John Up North, @Morton's toes, @gutta percha, @Desiderius

    The Scouring of the Shire, as it were.

  185. @JohnPlywood
    @Almost Missouri

    Unaolved murders are more likely to involve white offenders, you stupid fuck, and stranger murders are more likely to be interracial (logically), but interracial murders aren't significantly more likely to be stranger murders.


    Imagine being as low-IQ and hysterical as this fucking cuck, "almost missouri".

    Replies: @rebel yell, @Whiskey, @Mike Tre

    Imagine being a Hindu full of envy and sexually attracted to negro violence. Oh wait, you don’t have to because you already are.

  186. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

  187. @Colin Wright
    @JohnPlywood

    'No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.'

    I doubt it. Disproportionately, what white murders there are are going to fall into the 'in eighty percent of all homicides, the killer knows the victim' category. It's not going to be hard to figure out who killed Mrs. Brown if the neighbors heard Mr. and Mrs. Brown fighting loudly every night.

    Your basic white homicide is like that the father of my daughter's boyfriend witnessed. Two neighbors started arguing, then one got a gun and killed the other. Stupid -- but not hard to solve.

    Disproportionately, it's blacks who murder total strangers for no reason at all. That's why blacks disproportionately receive the death penalty. They're the ones who commit the killings for which there was no excuse at all.

    So black stupidity and carelessness notwithstanding, disproportionately it's blacks who were the unknown assailant who shot and killed that cab driver or whatever. For all their faults, a non-black would be highly unlikely to commit such a crime.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood, @JohnnyWalker123

    White homicides seem to usually involve family members. A cheating husband gets killed by the angry wife. A drug-addicted son murders his parents for money. That sort of thing. The murderer is almost always identified rather quickly.

    Black homicides are often domestic situations, but many involve a bunch of local tough guys fighting at a party. Then someone opens fire and runs away. Or a drive-by shooting occurs at night, with the perpetrator fleeing under the cover of darkness. Those cases are harder to solve, especially if no one talks.

    White mafia homicides are often not solved, but the mafia families have mostly faded away in recent decades. So that might be a rare exception.

  188. @Johann Ricke
    @Jack D


    From the Quora, an interesting factoid:

    if you factor in the difference in fatherlessness by demographic group in the US crime statistics, the disparity in the violent crime rate among different ethnic groups fades away entirely.
     

     
    In MLK's time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites. Yet black crime was higher by about the same proportion relative to whites in that era. As Marty pointed out earlier, crime began skyrocketing in the 60's as crime rate per capita went up, while incarceration per crime went down. Such are the fruits of permissiveness in the criminal justice system. That murder per capita is the one crime that hasn't gone up since the sixties is largely a tribute to a combo of massaging the numbers (exemplified - for a non-murder stat - by "suicide by cop" being used by the FBI to characterize the attempting mass killing of GOP House Reps several years ago) and great leaps in emergency department medical care re injuries that would have been fatal prior to those advances.

    Replies: @AceDeuce

    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.

    Horsecrap.

    • Agree: James Braxton
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke
    @AceDeuce



    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.

     

    Horsecrap.
     
    Courtesy of Twinkie:
    https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.110.213/pg2.00d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Black-Men-Historical-Marriage-1890-to-2010.jpg
    https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.110.213/pg2.00d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Black-Women-Historical-Marriage-1890-to-2010.jpg

    Replies: @AceDeuce

  189. Beverly Hills Cop (6/10) Movie CLIP – Customs Inspector (1984) HD

    CLIP DESCRIPTION:
    Axel (Eddie Murphy) poses as a custom inspector to get what he needs.

    Then tell me, how can a black man, dressed like me, just march in and start poking around without being asked any questions?
    […]
    I do security checks all over the nation. And apart from Cleveland, this place has the worst security in the nation.

  190. @Rob McX
    @Just another serf

    And when you do venture out, you have the comfort of knowing that that huge black guy who follows you down a dark alleyway is sure to be a scientist or a neurosurgeon.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    And when you do venture out, you have the comfort of knowing that that huge black guy who follows you down a dark alleyway is sure to be a scientist or a neurosurgeon.

    Or the best burger griller in the land.

  191. @res
    @Almost Missouri

    It's good to see that JohnPlywood has joined Corvinus in offering his seal of approval (Disagree or Troll flag) to good comments.

    Thanks, John. It makes those good comments easier to find.

    Replies: @Alfa158, @Corvinus

    It’s great that you put spin on my disapproval. It only shows how right I am.

    • Replies: @res
    @Corvinus

    Keep telling yourself that.

    To anyone who wants to know how to use the Corvinus seal of approval effectively, just open Corvinus' commenter page then search for ": Corvinus" which typically shows a number of interesting comments. The Corvinus seal of approval really only applies to Disagree and Troll flags, but since he uses those so much more frequently than Thanks or Agree (a disagreeable crow he is) just searching for the : works well.

  192. @Anonymous
    @Travis

    Wrong, as usual. Black women have a higher rate of interracial marriage than white women and birth a large number of interracial children out of wedlock, mostly with white and Hispanic men. The percentage would be even higher if abortion were decriminalized - a significant number of interracial children would be born to black prostitutes if not for abortion.



    Also, black people are on average 22% white in America and can absolutely birth white sons. See also:



    https://preview.redd.it/ewlxwghh23e61.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b27b1de45154baf71ecccfa6dc608447b55eb60c

    Replies: @magila, @jallynn, @Boomthorkell

    How much whiskey do you think it took for the Irishman to make it with an abo woman?

    • LOL: 3g4me
    • Replies: @bruce county
    @magila

    They drank Poteen... the good stuff.

  193. @Anonymous
    @Travis

    Wrong, as usual. Black women have a higher rate of interracial marriage than white women and birth a large number of interracial children out of wedlock, mostly with white and Hispanic men. The percentage would be even higher if abortion were decriminalized - a significant number of interracial children would be born to black prostitutes if not for abortion.



    Also, black people are on average 22% white in America and can absolutely birth white sons. See also:



    https://preview.redd.it/ewlxwghh23e61.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b27b1de45154baf71ecccfa6dc608447b55eb60c

    Replies: @magila, @jallynn, @Boomthorkell

    I’m not sure why are you are using Australian Aboriginals to prove your assertion.

  194. @Travis
    @Stan D Mute

    often the truth can no longer be hidden and people realize they have been lied to. The Truth will eventual reveal itself and Fauci will be exposed as an evil man who helped destroy America with his lies.

    Nobody ever liked Bill Gates. He has been despised for decades but was able to use his wealth to buy media praise. With a pending divorce the press and media can see a better gravy train coming from Melinda Gates so it makes sense to attack Bill and start taking payments from Melinda. It is clear she filed has filed for divorce and was smart to start planting the Gates-Epstein stories to discredit her Husband and make him look like the bad guy. Women are very vindictive when they end relationships. She will spend billions to destroy Bill Gates for cheating on her. Hell hath no Fury like a woman scorned.

    Replies: @Truth

    Hell hath no Fury like a woman scorned.

    ?

    • LOL: Anonymous Jew
  195. res says:
    @Corvinus
    @res

    It’s great that you put spin on my disapproval. It only shows how right I am.

    Replies: @res

    Keep telling yourself that.

    To anyone who wants to know how to use the Corvinus seal of approval effectively, just open Corvinus’ commenter page then search for “: Corvinus” which typically shows a number of interesting comments. The Corvinus seal of approval really only applies to Disagree and Troll flags, but since he uses those so much more frequently than Thanks or Agree (a disagreeable crow he is) just searching for the : works well.

  196. @Anonymous
    @Travis

    Wrong, as usual. Black women have a higher rate of interracial marriage than white women and birth a large number of interracial children out of wedlock, mostly with white and Hispanic men. The percentage would be even higher if abortion were decriminalized - a significant number of interracial children would be born to black prostitutes if not for abortion.



    Also, black people are on average 22% white in America and can absolutely birth white sons. See also:



    https://preview.redd.it/ewlxwghh23e61.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b27b1de45154baf71ecccfa6dc608447b55eb60c

    Replies: @magila, @jallynn, @Boomthorkell

    Aborigines have different genes and inherited feature traits than Africans. Steve did an article one exactly that. African physical trait genes seem to not be recessive…unlike blue eyes and red hair, for an example.

    Maybe\maybe not with black prostitutes. Do you know from personal experience? I recall two once leaping at my crotch in Las Vegas, which implies this strategy must have worked on someone at some point, if not me.

    I’m willing to believe your statistics though, or at least that they were collected in good faith, even if this picture was not used in good faith (it even says on it that it is about aboriginal blood.) Care to provide them?

    They sure are 22% white. Guess it wasn’t enough. Maybe it was just enough, but for what?

  197. @JohnPlywood
    @rebel yell

    No, the solved averages will not follow, because evading identification as a murderer involves a higher IQ than the average criminal. Whites are doing the unsolved murders.


    I like how IQ and HBD goes out the window whenever you detestable alt-right maggots need it to.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @rebel yell, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @Boomthorkell

    Ah, you seem to imply the Blacks also do not have unsolved murders.

    Is this implying an HBD bias on your part, that Blacks are less capable of having unsolved murder cases than whites? That would be racist and paranoid, John. I’m sure they can get away with murder just as good as any Korean or Swede-descendant, whose higher IQ nature would absolutely be connected to cleverer ways to murder people and definitely not doing-things-in-life-besides-killing-each-other-over-foolish-things.

    Why set up a straw man? You’re plywood. If you could support the lawn mower we got the other day, you can support a more logically consistent argument. Maybe you just prefer to call people maggots. Probably that.

  198. @JohnPlywood
    A lot of blacks that got convicted were falsely convicted. Blacks have a higher rate of exoneration than whites, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Nobidy really believes these bogus statistics, which are heavily the result of corrupt pigs slapping charges on black men, often with the aid of jailhouse snitches. Most of this happens in the South and California. Southern "justice" is a motherfuker. We should have exterminated white southerners when we conquered them.

    Replies: @Redmen, @silviosilver

    Yeah, and the people in victims of crime surveys who describe the perp as black at rates that match fbi stats are all liars, all of them. It’s a conspiracy or something.

    (It’s good that racial reality makes you mad and miserable though. Slimy POS’s like you should certainly be made to feel mad and miserable as often possible. You deserve no less.)

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @silviosilver

    There are no such surveys and every day is a death pill of pure nihilistic sorrow and rage for the alt-right/white trashionalists. Suck the abyss, my bitch.

  199. @Clyde
    @West reanimator

    The black share of murders was down fom 1980-88 when Reagan was President. He was a law and order President.


    It was down from 1981-84. Which was not even his whole first term. His second term, murders increased again, and they went on increasing until the mid 90s.
     
    Of course I saw this about Reagan's second term, but still way down compared to the black assaults, riots, burning and murder rebellion (Mad Maxine is salivating) we have today. Look at the graph again (w all due respect)
    Translation-- "You don't know what you got 'till its gone" -- Joni Mitchell
    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone! This is how the ChiComs can be moving in today to neutralize us and prevail. And I saw this all happen. Patrick Buchanan warned us starting in 1988!

    If you are young and want a South African situation, then you are getting it and our blacks never even mined gold and diamonds for our elites that trickled down some to the South African white plebs. Just some effin southern states cotton. Picked and processed by our now useless blacks. Cotton that was mostly shipped to Great Britain where when woven into textiles would have 500% value added to it. 500% is my guess-timate

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Anonymous, @silviosilver

    Add in our mighty industrial base back in the Reagan era and our minimal trade deficits. All gone!

    The Boomercon is strong in this one. Back on planet earth, everyone remembers the 80s as the era of exploding trade (and budget) deficits and the beginning of American deindustrialization. (They were “minimal” only in comparison to what would come later. In their own day, they were unprecedented.)

    The only lasting Reagan legacies were the monumentally false sense of security that 60s-style libtard lunacy was safely behind us and the millions of illegals that were amnestied. In other words, the “Reagan Revolution” accomplished sweet fuck all.

    • Agree: JMcG
  200. @Anonymous Jew
    Has anyone done research on other countries with Bantus or other types of Africans? UK, Australia, Brazil, et al? I wonder what the White-Black crime disparity is across countries and cultures.

    Replies: @Anon, @Colin Wright, @silviosilver

    I saw a stat a couple of months ago on London, where blacks are 13% of the population but responsible for 46% of one of (I forget which) violent crime/knife crime/murder. We had a laugh on twitter about 13/50 being some “criminological constant.”

    Stats I’ve seen for Brazil had blacks at a minimum 2:1 more criminal (ie based on my memory, it might have been higher). Of course, the proviso there is that plenty of the “non-blacks” in those stats would qualify as blacks by American standards, so the real ratio is possibly higher.

  201. Anonymous[204] • Disclaimer says:
    @JohnPlywood
    @Colin Wright

    Laugbable, you just said they average white murder was impulsive. They aren't. Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Boomthorkell

    Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.

    Not when you control for population.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  202. @AceDeuce
    @Johann Ricke


    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.
     
    Horsecrap.

    Replies: @Johann Ricke

    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.

    Horsecrap.

    Courtesy of Twinkie:

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    @Johann Ricke

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

    You've got some "reformatted and posted by BlackDemographics(dot) com" homemade looking graph with pictures of two groids snuggling on it, and some BS "Census" crap in the corner, and you think that's real? Dude-I half wondered if you'd pull this, but I gave you more credit.

    Anyway, it doesn't matter. Blacks were a mess well before the 1960s.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850739/


    Although before the 1960s age at first marriage and the proportion of women ever married were similar among whites and blacks, blacks had higher rates of marital dissolution during this period. If we examine the percentage of ever-married white and black women who were currently married and living with their husbands at midlife, the historical story about trends in the racial marriage gap changes somewhat. Figure 2 displays these results.

    We now see large racial differences in the likelihood of being married even as early as 1930, when only 69 percent of ever-married black women in their early 40s were married and living with a spouse, compared with roughly 88 percent of white women the same age. Some of this difference reflects higher rates of mortality among black men, but some is due to higher rates of separation.
     

  203. @JohnPlywood
    @Colin Wright

    Laugbable, you just said they average white murder was impulsive. They aren't. Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Boomthorkell

    If you think there are a fuck ton of white serial killers, you are a paranoid schizophrenic existing in a false reality. Quit deluding yourself. The staggering majority of people have never met a white serial killer, let alone been killed by one. The amount of white serial killers as a percentage of the population is so infinitesimal as to be irrelevant to anyone outside your strange, demented, lonely fantasies. Any white serial killer is a glitch in the system, or more likely, invented by your own strange fears and media-induced hallucinations. Go rewire your brain with a 12-gauge.

    Ha ha ha ha ha, man it’s fun using this writing style. I totally get you, man. Of course, maybe you want to argue in proportional and relative populations. In this case, as Sailer pointed out before, Black serial killers appear to take the cake here. You may believe otherwise and are entitled to your faggot (sic) free speech on this issue, currently at least.

    Having said that, no matter how small the number of transexuals and serial killers (or transexual serial killers) is, it remains an issue that should be solved, and not blasted across media for people to be inspired by. Oh, I realize now I was referencing an earlier, exact opposite opinion you had on a similar subject. How interesting.

    • Thanks: JohnPlywood, TTSSYF
    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
    @Boomthorkell

    The US murder rate has declined in proportion to the declining number of young white adult white people, shedding light on the true nature of crime in America.

    Blacks have never "taken the cake" on serial killing. Turns out whites are the most violent (and evasive) race in America.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485


    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.
     
    Man, you white people are so fucked when you finally get your collective day in court...

    Replies: @Boomthorkell

  204. @magila
    @Anonymous

    How much whiskey do you think it took for the Irishman to make it with an abo woman?

    Replies: @bruce county

    They drank Poteen… the good stuff.

    • LOL: magila
  205. @Boomthorkell
    @JohnPlywood

    If you think there are a fuck ton of white serial killers, you are a paranoid schizophrenic existing in a false reality. Quit deluding yourself. The staggering majority of people have never met a white serial killer, let alone been killed by one. The amount of white serial killers as a percentage of the population is so infinitesimal as to be irrelevant to anyone outside your strange, demented, lonely fantasies. Any white serial killer is a glitch in the system, or more likely, invented by your own strange fears and media-induced hallucinations. Go rewire your brain with a 12-gauge.

    Ha ha ha ha ha, man it's fun using this writing style. I totally get you, man. Of course, maybe you want to argue in proportional and relative populations. In this case, as Sailer pointed out before, Black serial killers appear to take the cake here. You may believe otherwise and are entitled to your faggot (sic) free speech on this issue, currently at least.

    Having said that, no matter how small the number of transexuals and serial killers (or transexual serial killers) is, it remains an issue that should be solved, and not blasted across media for people to be inspired by. Oh, I realize now I was referencing an earlier, exact opposite opinion you had on a similar subject. How interesting.

    Replies: @JohnPlywood

    The US murder rate has declined in proportion to the declining number of young white adult white people, shedding light on the true nature of crime in America.

    Blacks have never “taken the cake” on serial killing. Turns out whites are the most violent (and evasive) race in America.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485

    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.

    Man, you white people are so fucked when you finally get your collective day in court…

    • Replies: @Boomthorkell
    @JohnPlywood

    Seems more like a global civilizational trend to me, murder rates are also down from the 1500s. Can't really say what the 500s was like by comparison. I wonder what the murder rate of the Natives they replaced was. Maybe Hunter-Nomads (and limited agriculturalists) have lower rates of murder, replacing them with higher rates of external violence.

    Sounds like a small sample size to me. I'll leave the contestation of it to someone else who I'm sure will come up with some set of contrary statistics or evidence of statistical unreliability. Oh, joy of joys.

    Ha, us and everyone else. Krugovaya Poruka is an eternal feature of the Cosmos, and all peoples have been defendants, accusers, judges, and enforcers. If you are the proud Anglo-Son that you say you are, then you can save me a seat next to you in the docket. Otherwise, I wish your people a just trial.

  206. Anonymous[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @silviosilver
    @JohnPlywood

    Yeah, and the people in victims of crime surveys who describe the perp as black at rates that match fbi stats are all liars, all of them. It's a conspiracy or something.

    (It's good that racial reality makes you mad and miserable though. Slimy POS's like you should certainly be made to feel mad and miserable as often possible. You deserve no less.)

    Replies: @Anonymous

    There are no such surveys and every day is a death pill of pure nihilistic sorrow and rage for the alt-right/white trashionalists. Suck the abyss, my bitch.

  207. Anonymous[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @JohnPlywood


    Most white murders are premeditated, and there are a fuck ton of white serial killers.
     
    Not when you control for population.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.
     
    Wrong. Whites are underrepresented among serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  208. @Johann Ricke
    @AceDeuce



    In MLK’s time, blacks were *more* likely to be married than whites.

     

    Horsecrap.
     
    Courtesy of Twinkie:
    https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.110.213/pg2.00d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Black-Men-Historical-Marriage-1890-to-2010.jpg
    https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.110.213/pg2.00d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Black-Women-Historical-Marriage-1890-to-2010.jpg

    Replies: @AceDeuce

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

    You’ve got some “reformatted and posted by BlackDemographics(dot) com” homemade looking graph with pictures of two groids snuggling on it, and some BS “Census” crap in the corner, and you think that’s real? Dude-I half wondered if you’d pull this, but I gave you more credit.

    Anyway, it doesn’t matter. Blacks were a mess well before the 1960s.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850739/

    Although before the 1960s age at first marriage and the proportion of women ever married were similar among whites and blacks, blacks had higher rates of marital dissolution during this period. If we examine the percentage of ever-married white and black women who were currently married and living with their husbands at midlife, the historical story about trends in the racial marriage gap changes somewhat. Figure 2 displays these results.

    We now see large racial differences in the likelihood of being married even as early as 1930, when only 69 percent of ever-married black women in their early 40s were married and living with a spouse, compared with roughly 88 percent of white women the same age. Some of this difference reflects higher rates of mortality among black men, but some is due to higher rates of separation.

  209. @Just another serf
    I watch a lot of TV, sometimes 18 hours a day. I just love it because it’s so intellectually simulating.

    Anyway, the TV shows me many, many Black people, or people of color. They are all awesome. They are just sweet folks, really great people.

    So I’m not buying any of this blanket criticism that Steve Sailor keeps writing about. He could be a racist for all I know. Which is just awful and wrong.

    Replies: @Rob McX, @YetAnotherAnon, @anonymouseperson

    If only blacks in real life were like the way they are shown on Tv, movies and commercials.

  210. Blacks are just an incredibly violent people. Avoid when possible.

  211. Anonymous[319] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.

    Wrong. Whites are underrepresented among serial killers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Dead wrong. White males are responsible for more than 70% of serial bomicides, a nearly 2 times overrepresentation. They are also the most sexually depraved and behaviorally abnormal killers.


    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485


    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.
     

    Replies: @res

  212. Anonymous[953] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Wrong. Even when controlling for population there are a fuck ton of white male serial killers.
     
    Wrong. Whites are underrepresented among serial killers.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Dead wrong. White males are responsible for more than 70% of serial bomicides, a nearly 2 times overrepresentation. They are also the most sexually depraved and behaviorally abnormal killers.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485

    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.

    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous

    It is always fun to take a deeper look at references where someone apparently only looks at the abstract. You do realize that in controversial topics (like differences in racial crime rates) the abstract often has a fair amount of spin compared to the paper contents, right?

    First, let's give a citation which has free full text to make this easier.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285521902_A_Study_of_African_American_Serial_Killers

    The text adds a bit more detail to the abstract description of African American serial killers.


    They were less sexually deviant but more likely to rape their victims.
     
    On page 8/314 the paper talks about the possible unreliability of its data sources. From page 4/310 we see for sources they used true crime books (!), encyclopedias of murder, newspaper accounts, and court records.

    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions. Comparing the 1970s and 1990s here.

    The percentage of Black serial killers in these two periods rose from 38% to 54%, and in recent years the proportion has risen to roughly 80%.
     
    Now relative to their 13% of the population, THAT shows what over-representation looks like.

    I always enjoy it when people use references which on close examination refute their point.

    Regarding white male representation, males are heavily over-represented as serial killers in general. So let's stick to comparing by race--the original point.

    P.S. Cottrell (2012) is

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B010BN4L1O

    From the Amazon page.

    Based on his findings white serial killers have been underrepresented throughout American history when compared to the percentage of the population they represent by a factor of 1.79 on average. On the other hand, black serial killers have been overrepresented 3 to 7 times their portion of the population, with a 150 year average of 4.44. Another startling trend he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 30.23% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%. This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 77.27% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.

     

    Ready to admit you were wrong yet, Anon953? Your "Dead wrong" assertion is looking quite funny right now.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  213. @JohnPlywood
    @Boomthorkell

    The US murder rate has declined in proportion to the declining number of young white adult white people, shedding light on the true nature of crime in America.

    Blacks have never "taken the cake" on serial killing. Turns out whites are the most violent (and evasive) race in America.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485


    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.
     
    Man, you white people are so fucked when you finally get your collective day in court...

    Replies: @Boomthorkell

    Seems more like a global civilizational trend to me, murder rates are also down from the 1500s. Can’t really say what the 500s was like by comparison. I wonder what the murder rate of the Natives they replaced was. Maybe Hunter-Nomads (and limited agriculturalists) have lower rates of murder, replacing them with higher rates of external violence.

    Sounds like a small sample size to me. I’ll leave the contestation of it to someone else who I’m sure will come up with some set of contrary statistics or evidence of statistical unreliability. Oh, joy of joys.

    Ha, us and everyone else. Krugovaya Poruka is an eternal feature of the Cosmos, and all peoples have been defendants, accusers, judges, and enforcers. If you are the proud Anglo-Son that you say you are, then you can save me a seat next to you in the docket. Otherwise, I wish your people a just trial.

  214. res says:
    @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Dead wrong. White males are responsible for more than 70% of serial bomicides, a nearly 2 times overrepresentation. They are also the most sexually depraved and behaviorally abnormal killers.


    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377938.2014.894485


    A comparison of 57 African American serial killers since 1900 with 205 Euro-American serial killers on 83 variables revealed that African American serial killers killed fewer victims, committed fewer sexually deviant and violent acts in their crimes (such as less often torturing victims or committing bizarre sexual acts such as necrophilia), and seemed more normal in childhood.
     

    Replies: @res

    It is always fun to take a deeper look at references where someone apparently only looks at the abstract. You do realize that in controversial topics (like differences in racial crime rates) the abstract often has a fair amount of spin compared to the paper contents, right?

    First, let’s give a citation which has free full text to make this easier.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285521902_A_Study_of_African_American_Serial_Killers

    The text adds a bit more detail to the abstract description of African American serial killers.

    They were less sexually deviant but more likely to rape their victims.

    On page 8/314 the paper talks about the possible unreliability of its data sources. From page 4/310 we see for sources they used true crime books (!), encyclopedias of murder, newspaper accounts, and court records.

    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions. Comparing the 1970s and 1990s here.

    The percentage of Black serial killers in these two periods rose from 38% to 54%, and in recent years the proportion has risen to roughly 80%.

    Now relative to their 13% of the population, THAT shows what over-representation looks like.

    I always enjoy it when people use references which on close examination refute their point.

    Regarding white male representation, males are heavily over-represented as serial killers in general. So let’s stick to comparing by race–the original point.

    P.S. Cottrell (2012) is

    From the Amazon page.

    Based on his findings white serial killers have been underrepresented throughout American history when compared to the percentage of the population they represent by a factor of 1.79 on average. On the other hand, black serial killers have been overrepresented 3 to 7 times their portion of the population, with a 150 year average of 4.44. Another startling trend he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 30.23% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%. This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 77.27% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.

    Ready to admit you were wrong yet, Anon953? Your “Dead wrong” assertion is looking quite funny right now.

    • Thanks: Boomthorkell
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @res

    Dear jackass,

    You are cherry-selecting tidbits of that study that don't even support your wants and wishes.


    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions.
     
    The best part is where you completely ignore the fact that the paper does not quote Cottrell on that page, but says "Cottrell argues...".


    And then, on the very next page (310), reveals that their own analysis is sharply at odds with Cottrell's self published comedy book, including in average number of victims:


    The African-American serial killers were suspected by law enforcement officials of having killed significantly fewer victims than the Euro-American serial killers: 8.7 vs 15.2.
     
    The study is basically debunking Cottrell's self-published comedy book (not a real study).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.


    BECAUSE AS MULTIPLE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOUR STUPID ASSES FOR DAYS, THEY ARE LOWER IQ AND LESS LIKELY TO COMMIT AN EXTENDED NUMBER OF OFFENSES BEFORE GETTING CAUGHT. BLACK SERIAL KILLERS COMMIT APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE SERIAL HOMICIDES THAT WHITES DO, AND THAT ASSUMES A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF BLACKS, WEREN'T FALSELY CONVICTED OR ACCUSED OF CRIMES THEY DIDN'T COMMIT (THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE).

    I noticed that the national RATE of serial homicide FELL OFF A CLIFF in the 1980s when the mumber of white males ages 18-30 declined precipitously. Which is, of course, self-explanatory. We all know who is responsible for serial homicide in America.


    So it's time for you and Justin Cottrell to GET OUT OF TOWN ON A FAST TRAIN.

    Replies: @res

  215. Anonymous[384] • Disclaimer says:
    @res
    @Anonymous

    It is always fun to take a deeper look at references where someone apparently only looks at the abstract. You do realize that in controversial topics (like differences in racial crime rates) the abstract often has a fair amount of spin compared to the paper contents, right?

    First, let's give a citation which has free full text to make this easier.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285521902_A_Study_of_African_American_Serial_Killers

    The text adds a bit more detail to the abstract description of African American serial killers.


    They were less sexually deviant but more likely to rape their victims.
     
    On page 8/314 the paper talks about the possible unreliability of its data sources. From page 4/310 we see for sources they used true crime books (!), encyclopedias of murder, newspaper accounts, and court records.

    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions. Comparing the 1970s and 1990s here.

    The percentage of Black serial killers in these two periods rose from 38% to 54%, and in recent years the proportion has risen to roughly 80%.
     
    Now relative to their 13% of the population, THAT shows what over-representation looks like.

    I always enjoy it when people use references which on close examination refute their point.

    Regarding white male representation, males are heavily over-represented as serial killers in general. So let's stick to comparing by race--the original point.

    P.S. Cottrell (2012) is

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B010BN4L1O

    From the Amazon page.

    Based on his findings white serial killers have been underrepresented throughout American history when compared to the percentage of the population they represent by a factor of 1.79 on average. On the other hand, black serial killers have been overrepresented 3 to 7 times their portion of the population, with a 150 year average of 4.44. Another startling trend he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 30.23% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%. This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 77.27% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.

     

    Ready to admit you were wrong yet, Anon953? Your "Dead wrong" assertion is looking quite funny right now.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Dear jackass,

    You are cherry-selecting tidbits of that study that don’t even support your wants and wishes.

    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions.

    The best part is where you completely ignore the fact that the paper does not quote Cottrell on that page, but says “Cottrell argues…”.

    And then, on the very next page (310), reveals that their own analysis is sharply at odds with Cottrell’s self published comedy book, including in average number of victims:

    The African-American serial killers were suspected by law enforcement officials of having killed significantly fewer victims than the Euro-American serial killers: 8.7 vs 15.2.

    The study is basically debunking Cottrell’s self-published comedy book (not a real study).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.

    BECAUSE AS MULTIPLE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOUR STUPID ASSES FOR DAYS, THEY ARE LOWER IQ AND LESS LIKELY TO COMMIT AN EXTENDED NUMBER OF OFFENSES BEFORE GETTING CAUGHT. BLACK SERIAL KILLERS COMMIT APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE SERIAL HOMICIDES THAT WHITES DO, AND THAT ASSUMES A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF BLACKS, WEREN’T FALSELY CONVICTED OR ACCUSED OF CRIMES THEY DIDN’T COMMIT (THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE).

    I noticed that the national RATE of serial homicide FELL OFF A CLIFF in the 1980s when the mumber of white males ages 18-30 declined precipitously. Which is, of course, self-explanatory. We all know who is responsible for serial homicide in America.

    So it’s time for you and Justin Cottrell to GET OUT OF TOWN ON A FAST TRAIN.

    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous

    Ad hominems. The best way ever to say to someone arguing with you: you win.


    The study is basically debunking Cottrell’s self-published comedy book (not a real study).
     
    No. You are comparing apples and oranges. Number of serial killers vs. number of victims. And note that Cottrell attempted to do a complete survey. While your source chose selected examples (some might call THAT cherry picking).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.
     
    With no numbers supporting that assertion (remember that your link was selected examples not a complete enumeration). Do you have any?

    So you are counting victims rather than offenders? OK. Whatever it take to make the numbers come out in a way you like (assuming your numbers are even true). And you accuse me of cherry picking. Note that changing the question like that negates neither what I or the original comment you responded to said.

    THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE
     
    Of course they are. I dindu nuffin. If they are disproportionately accused it might have something to do with them being guilty at something like 7x the rate of whites.

    Here is another paper looking at the over-representation of black serial killers.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251345434_African_American_Serial_Killers_Over-Represented_Yet_Underacknowledged

    Some samples.

    Hickey’s (2002) research noted that one in five known serial killers is black, which shows a clearly greater proportion than might be statistically expected, since the percentage of the US population that is African American is approximately 13%.
    ...
    There appears to be little variance regarding the number of victims and manner of predations when examining black serial killers juxtaposed to their white counterparts.

     

    Note that their focus is on the lack of media attention for black serial killers. Which shows how intrinsically biased your paper which used thing like true crime novels as sources is given the bias of its sources.

    P.S. You do understand that males are virtually all of the serial killers, right? Your focus on males just muddies the waters of the race discussion. Which is of course your intent.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  216. @Hernan Pizzaro del Blanco
    @peterike

    True, and the other part of the equation is the number of whites. Since the number of whites is actually declining so the ratio of whites to Blacks has gone from 6 to 1 in 1990 to 4 to 1 today.

    Replies: @Polistra

    Was close to 9:1 back in 1960, right? Gotta love that trend!

    Soon we’ll be at parity, then we all have big party.

  217. res says:
    @Anonymous
    @res

    Dear jackass,

    You are cherry-selecting tidbits of that study that don't even support your wants and wishes.


    But the best part is on page 3/309 where the paper quotes at length from Cottrell (2012) about proportions.
     
    The best part is where you completely ignore the fact that the paper does not quote Cottrell on that page, but says "Cottrell argues...".


    And then, on the very next page (310), reveals that their own analysis is sharply at odds with Cottrell's self published comedy book, including in average number of victims:


    The African-American serial killers were suspected by law enforcement officials of having killed significantly fewer victims than the Euro-American serial killers: 8.7 vs 15.2.
     
    The study is basically debunking Cottrell's self-published comedy book (not a real study).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.


    BECAUSE AS MULTIPLE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOUR STUPID ASSES FOR DAYS, THEY ARE LOWER IQ AND LESS LIKELY TO COMMIT AN EXTENDED NUMBER OF OFFENSES BEFORE GETTING CAUGHT. BLACK SERIAL KILLERS COMMIT APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE SERIAL HOMICIDES THAT WHITES DO, AND THAT ASSUMES A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF BLACKS, WEREN'T FALSELY CONVICTED OR ACCUSED OF CRIMES THEY DIDN'T COMMIT (THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE).

    I noticed that the national RATE of serial homicide FELL OFF A CLIFF in the 1980s when the mumber of white males ages 18-30 declined precipitously. Which is, of course, self-explanatory. We all know who is responsible for serial homicide in America.


    So it's time for you and Justin Cottrell to GET OUT OF TOWN ON A FAST TRAIN.

    Replies: @res

    Ad hominems. The best way ever to say to someone arguing with you: you win.

    The study is basically debunking Cottrell’s self-published comedy book (not a real study).

    No. You are comparing apples and oranges. Number of serial killers vs. number of victims. And note that Cottrell attempted to do a complete survey. While your source chose selected examples (some might call THAT cherry picking).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.

    With no numbers supporting that assertion (remember that your link was selected examples not a complete enumeration). Do you have any?

    So you are counting victims rather than offenders? OK. Whatever it take to make the numbers come out in a way you like (assuming your numbers are even true). And you accuse me of cherry picking. Note that changing the question like that negates neither what I or the original comment you responded to said.

    THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE

    Of course they are. I dindu nuffin. If they are disproportionately accused it might have something to do with them being guilty at something like 7x the rate of whites.

    Here is another paper looking at the over-representation of black serial killers.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251345434_African_American_Serial_Killers_Over-Represented_Yet_Underacknowledged

    Some samples.

    Hickey’s (2002) research noted that one in five known serial killers is black, which shows a clearly greater proportion than might be statistically expected, since the percentage of the US population that is African American is approximately 13%.

    There appears to be little variance regarding the number of victims and manner of predations when examining black serial killers juxtaposed to their white counterparts.

    Note that their focus is on the lack of media attention for black serial killers. Which shows how intrinsically biased your paper which used thing like true crime novels as sources is given the bias of its sources.

    P.S. You do understand that males are virtually all of the serial killers, right? Your focus on males just muddies the waters of the race discussion. Which is of course your intent.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @res

    It is not "apples and oranges" to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.


    If there are 1000 serial killers, and even a wild estimate like 50% are black, they are still doing less than half of the serial murders in America than whitr male serial killers, since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do. Your odds of being killed by a white serial killer are still significantly higher, especially if you're white, and whites are committing the majority of serial homicides in America. Hence the reputation of serial killers being white males is wholly deserved and rooted in the palpable truth.


    Your inabilility to understand this, or refusal to acknowledge it, just shows you how ideologically indoctrinated and insane you are.

    I find it interesting that Unz.com commenters are quick to defend the "little bit of truth in all stereotypes" until those stereotypes are particularly harmful to white men's reputations. Then, the masses got it all wrong somehow.


    You people are so fucked once you finally get your day in court. You're like... The most ignoble human beings that have ever lived.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res, @Boomthorkell

  218. Anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:
    @res
    @Anonymous

    Ad hominems. The best way ever to say to someone arguing with you: you win.


    The study is basically debunking Cottrell’s self-published comedy book (not a real study).
     
    No. You are comparing apples and oranges. Number of serial killers vs. number of victims. And note that Cottrell attempted to do a complete survey. While your source chose selected examples (some might call THAT cherry picking).

    I said that white males are responsible for 70% of serial homicides. Do you know what a serial homicide is? What you are obsessing over is what percentage of black criminals who are classified as serial killers. Black males are overrepresented in classifications as serial killers, but are responsible for way fewer serial homicides than are white males.
     
    With no numbers supporting that assertion (remember that your link was selected examples not a complete enumeration). Do you have any?

    So you are counting victims rather than offenders? OK. Whatever it take to make the numbers come out in a way you like (assuming your numbers are even true). And you accuse me of cherry picking. Note that changing the question like that negates neither what I or the original comment you responded to said.

    THEY CERTAINLY ALWAYS ARE
     
    Of course they are. I dindu nuffin. If they are disproportionately accused it might have something to do with them being guilty at something like 7x the rate of whites.

    Here is another paper looking at the over-representation of black serial killers.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251345434_African_American_Serial_Killers_Over-Represented_Yet_Underacknowledged

    Some samples.

    Hickey’s (2002) research noted that one in five known serial killers is black, which shows a clearly greater proportion than might be statistically expected, since the percentage of the US population that is African American is approximately 13%.
    ...
    There appears to be little variance regarding the number of victims and manner of predations when examining black serial killers juxtaposed to their white counterparts.

     

    Note that their focus is on the lack of media attention for black serial killers. Which shows how intrinsically biased your paper which used thing like true crime novels as sources is given the bias of its sources.

    P.S. You do understand that males are virtually all of the serial killers, right? Your focus on males just muddies the waters of the race discussion. Which is of course your intent.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    It is not “apples and oranges” to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.

    If there are 1000 serial killers, and even a wild estimate like 50% are black, they are still doing less than half of the serial murders in America than whitr male serial killers, since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do. Your odds of being killed by a white serial killer are still significantly higher, especially if you’re white, and whites are committing the majority of serial homicides in America. Hence the reputation of serial killers being white males is wholly deserved and rooted in the palpable truth.

    Your inabilility to understand this, or refusal to acknowledge it, just shows you how ideologically indoctrinated and insane you are.

    I find it interesting that Unz.com commenters are quick to defend the “little bit of truth in all stereotypes” until those stereotypes are particularly harmful to white men’s reputations. Then, the masses got it all wrong somehow.

    You people are so fucked once you finally get your day in court. You’re like… The most ignoble human beings that have ever lived.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Serial killing was fairly white in the 20th Century but has become blacker in recent decades.

    Replies: @res

    , @res
    @Anonymous


    It is not “apples and oranges” to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.
     
    Disagree. They are clearly not the same thing.

    since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do

     

    Data to support that? Remember that the paper I linked said: "There appears to be little variance regarding the number of victims and manner of predations when examining black serial killers juxtaposed to their white counterparts."

    It is clear the conversation is deteriorating when all I need to say in response is to repeat myself.

    The rest of your rant is just laughable. Thanks for the chuckle. Feel free to make a substantive response, but I am not holding my breath.
    , @Boomthorkell
    @Anonymous

    Stick to one account.

  219. @Anonymous
    @res

    It is not "apples and oranges" to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.


    If there are 1000 serial killers, and even a wild estimate like 50% are black, they are still doing less than half of the serial murders in America than whitr male serial killers, since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do. Your odds of being killed by a white serial killer are still significantly higher, especially if you're white, and whites are committing the majority of serial homicides in America. Hence the reputation of serial killers being white males is wholly deserved and rooted in the palpable truth.


    Your inabilility to understand this, or refusal to acknowledge it, just shows you how ideologically indoctrinated and insane you are.

    I find it interesting that Unz.com commenters are quick to defend the "little bit of truth in all stereotypes" until those stereotypes are particularly harmful to white men's reputations. Then, the masses got it all wrong somehow.


    You people are so fucked once you finally get your day in court. You're like... The most ignoble human beings that have ever lived.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res, @Boomthorkell

    Serial killing was fairly white in the 20th Century but has become blacker in recent decades.

    • Replies: @res
    @Steve Sailer

    Steve, Cottrell's book contends that blacks have always been over-represented as serial killers. Though you are right serial killers have become blacker in recent decades. From the Amazon page.


    he’s compiled a list of murderers that is equal too or greater than the number of white serial killers from 1860 to present. Few if any have ever heard any of their names or stories, until now. Based on his findings white serial killers have been underrepresented throughout American history when compared to the percentage of the population they represent by a factor of 1.79 on average. On the other hand, black serial killers have been overrepresented 3 to 7 times their portion of the population, with a 150 year average of 4.44. Another startling trend he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 30.23% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%. This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 77.27% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.
     
  220. res says:
    @Anonymous
    @res

    It is not "apples and oranges" to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.


    If there are 1000 serial killers, and even a wild estimate like 50% are black, they are still doing less than half of the serial murders in America than whitr male serial killers, since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do. Your odds of being killed by a white serial killer are still significantly higher, especially if you're white, and whites are committing the majority of serial homicides in America. Hence the reputation of serial killers being white males is wholly deserved and rooted in the palpable truth.


    Your inabilility to understand this, or refusal to acknowledge it, just shows you how ideologically indoctrinated and insane you are.

    I find it interesting that Unz.com commenters are quick to defend the "little bit of truth in all stereotypes" until those stereotypes are particularly harmful to white men's reputations. Then, the masses got it all wrong somehow.


    You people are so fucked once you finally get your day in court. You're like... The most ignoble human beings that have ever lived.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res, @Boomthorkell

    It is not “apples and oranges” to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.

    Disagree. They are clearly not the same thing.

    since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do

    Data to support that? Remember that the paper I linked said: “There appears to be little variance regarding the number of victims and manner of predations when examining black serial killers juxtaposed to their white counterparts.”

    It is clear the conversation is deteriorating when all I need to say in response is to repeat myself.

    The rest of your rant is just laughable. Thanks for the chuckle. Feel free to make a substantive response, but I am not holding my breath.

  221. res says:
    @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Serial killing was fairly white in the 20th Century but has become blacker in recent decades.

    Replies: @res

    Steve, Cottrell’s book contends that blacks have always been over-represented as serial killers. Though you are right serial killers have become blacker in recent decades. From the Amazon page.

    he’s compiled a list of murderers that is equal too or greater than the number of white serial killers from 1860 to present. Few if any have ever heard any of their names or stories, until now. Based on his findings white serial killers have been underrepresented throughout American history when compared to the percentage of the population they represent by a factor of 1.79 on average. On the other hand, black serial killers have been overrepresented 3 to 7 times their portion of the population, with a 150 year average of 4.44. Another startling trend he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 30.23% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%. This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 77.27% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.

  222. @Anonymous
    @res

    It is not "apples and oranges" to compare number of victims vs number of serial killers.


    If there are 1000 serial killers, and even a wild estimate like 50% are black, they are still doing less than half of the serial murders in America than whitr male serial killers, since blacks kill on average about half the number as the whites do. Your odds of being killed by a white serial killer are still significantly higher, especially if you're white, and whites are committing the majority of serial homicides in America. Hence the reputation of serial killers being white males is wholly deserved and rooted in the palpable truth.


    Your inabilility to understand this, or refusal to acknowledge it, just shows you how ideologically indoctrinated and insane you are.

    I find it interesting that Unz.com commenters are quick to defend the "little bit of truth in all stereotypes" until those stereotypes are particularly harmful to white men's reputations. Then, the masses got it all wrong somehow.


    You people are so fucked once you finally get your day in court. You're like... The most ignoble human beings that have ever lived.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @res, @Boomthorkell

    Stick to one account.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS