Annals of Self-Awareness: Jennifer Weiner
RSS
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Jennifer Weiner, author of the New York Times oped “I Want to Burn the Frat House of America to the Ground,” is back with a New York Times lament about how emotional, loud, angry women get ignored. (Jennifer Weiner should not be confused with Jennifer Senior, the NYT’s new full time oped columnist and author of the lament “The Jocks Will Inherit the Earth.”)
How Do I Explain Justice Kavanaugh to My Daughters?
The spectacle of this confirmation has reminded us that to many people, women’s suffering is a joke.
By Jennifer Weiner
Contributing Opinion WriterOct. 9, 2018
… Emotional women, loud women, angry women get ignored.
When will the winning end? Not as long as whiny losers write crap like this.
It’s a very simple explanation:
In what’s left of America, as in all remotely free societies, people are innocent until proven guilty, and unsubstantiated ravings do not constitute probative evidence.
There; that was a quick and easy conversation.
You are ignoring her when she has the right to have her feelings validated.
And in essence you are saying that nothing happened to her.
Blah...blah...blah...I could go on--I didn't even get to the white man/patriarchy/ oppression stuff but it's all so excruciatingly dull.
So, let me get this straight. This author is Jennifer Weiner, Junior? Or Jennifer Junior Weiner?
That’s what I told my daughter, along with “never ever be crude and common” and “You are a Princess so behave like one”. And she grew up to be such a fine person.
I take it Weiner is not offering the advice in this spirit?
If only.
Yeah, because it is unpleasant to be yelled at and disrespected. You can get amazingly far by being nice to people, even faking being nice.
In addition to zero awareness, these people have zero social skills.
Having said that, there is a relatively high correlation.
Emotional, loud, angry women would not be ignored if I was in charge. They would be heavily medicated and institutionalized.
Ah, the button is working correctly again.
Why do you mostly leave it to the commentariat to find pictures of the people you choose to write about? 😉
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she’d likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn’t discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
No comment.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
http://www.daniellemagazine.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/maxresdefault-74-1024x576.jpg
Trump Curse strikes retrospectively – Taylor Swift seems to have put on a lot of weight in 2018.
https://twitter.com/taylorswiftfat?lang=en
A normal man looks at what he is calling "perfection" and tells her to eat a freaking sandwich.Replies: @Lot, @YetAnotherAnon
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.
One would wish.
If Jews love immigration, this would have been great for them.
FDR would have spread Jewish immigration far and wide… and away from those dreaded Anglo-Irish Jocks.
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/271923/daf-yomi-254-strings-attached
Even now, Jews can practice immigration and emigrate from Anglo-Jock nations.
But funny how Jews are most attracted to Anglo-Germano-Irish Jock nations.
Why?
Also, we are a wealth-generating machine and they like wealth (OPM).
Correct, I remember when they ignored Serena Williams for this reason. Totally ignored her. Certainly no one praised her for making a scene.
OTOH, emotional men, loud men, angry men do not possess suitable judicial temperament and do not belong on the Supreme Court.
This bit of conventional wisdom will turn out to be as erroneous as when it was applied to the US Presidency. Bring on the emotion and turn up the volume!
Of course, the two situations are not comparable. Williams was playing a game of tennis. Her rôle was to play tennis, keep her mouth shut (or at any rate not badmouth the referees), and abide by the referees' decisions. This is generally called "sportsmanship." (Uh-oh! "Gendered language!"). Kavanaugh was testifying in his defense at a hearing. His rôle was to speak on his behalf, which necessarily in that context means arguing against the accusations. His strident words, if one insists on characterising them as such, were entirely appropriate to the venue. Williams' were not at all. (Indeed, words from her had no place at all in that venue.)
Truly, logic and objective analysis of the matter at hand are to be utterly disregarded in favour of hysterical emotions in the eyes of Weiner et al.. They've no grasp of the concept that what is appropriate in one context may not be appropriate in another. We shout and act a bit silly and obnoxious at parties on New Year's Eve or rock 'n' roll concerts. We keep quiet, or, perhaps, weep and wail (maybe even hysterically; that's okay and understandable) at funerals. We wear shorts to the beach, but suits in courtrooms. And so on. This stuff is not complicated.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
I wonder how she thinks emotional, loud, and angry men get treated. Pretty sure they get punched in the face more often than they get ignored.
How many Kevin Bacon degrees between Jennifer and Anthony? Or is one a weiner and the other a wiener? Who besides Steve can straighten that out for readers?
Real High School Haunt Movie
OTOH, emotional men, loud men, angry men do not possess suitable judicial temperament and do not belong on the Supreme Court.Replies: @Precious, @Autochthon
OTOH, emotional men, loud men, angry men do not possess suitable judicial temperament and do not belong on the Supreme Court.
This bit of conventional wisdom will turn out to be as erroneous as when it was applied to the US Presidency. Bring on the emotion and turn up the volume!
OTOH, emotional men, loud men, angry men do not possess suitable judicial temperament and do not belong on the Supreme Court.Replies: @Precious, @Autochthon
I saw a piece recently taking the position that Williams’ ravings and Kavanaugh’s testimony were comparable but Williams was punished whereas Kavanaugh was not, thus an unfair double standard exists.
Of course, the two situations are not comparable. Williams was playing a game of tennis. Her rôle was to play tennis, keep her mouth shut (or at any rate not badmouth the referees), and abide by the referees’ decisions. This is generally called “sportsmanship.” (Uh-oh! “Gendered language!”). Kavanaugh was testifying in his defense at a hearing. His rôle was to speak on his behalf, which necessarily in that context means arguing against the accusations. His strident words, if one insists on characterising them as such, were entirely appropriate to the venue. Williams’ were not at all. (Indeed, words from her had no place at all in that venue.)
Truly, logic and objective analysis of the matter at hand are to be utterly disregarded in favour of hysterical emotions in the eyes of Weiner et al.. They’ve no grasp of the concept that what is appropriate in one context may not be appropriate in another. We shout and act a bit silly and obnoxious at parties on New Year’s Eve or rock ‘n’ roll concerts. We keep quiet, or, perhaps, weep and wail (maybe even hysterically; that’s okay and understandable) at funerals. We wear shorts to the beach, but suits in courtrooms. And so on. This stuff is not complicated.
... for honesty, that is. OK, some ARE just really stupid.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
Not much left to the imagination in that tissue paperesque dress. I can clearly make out her areolas as well as her gunt.
The spectacle of this confirmation has reminded us that to many people, women’s suffering is a joke.
…and the spectacle of this confirmation has reminded many other people that women’s sufferage is a joke.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
I believe those are known as ‘Khazar Milkers’
I think the problem with a lot of these women is basically a failure of socialization. Most of them probably went from the houses of their henpecked fathers, on to ultra-feminist universities, then into the arms of a series of pussy-whipped boyfriends ultimately ending up with the hopelessly beta husband (or “partner” as many of them will unironically insist on calling “him”). They’re so used to men catering to their inane sensibilities and arbitrary whims that any indication of a male spine causes them to short circuit.
The murderous, terroristic rhetoric is also a form of empowerment, I guess? I blame Wonder Woman and Game of Thrones.
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
T H I C C.
3/10.
Would bang.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/jennifer-weiner-i-want-to-burn-the-frat-house-of-america-to-the-ground/#comment-2532659
Jen S’s husband was the NYT opinion page editor.
Some things, like movie production, New York editorializing, and federal reserving, are just best left to the Tribe.
RodRo: Mueller is starting to look into Team Trump and Carter Page's Israel connections. Shut it down!
http://crownheights.info/assets/media/featured/20110510-chasid.jpgReplies: @Anonym, @Colin Wright
Well-behaved women seldom make herstory.
Similar to the sign some women hang in their kitchens "A clean house is the sign of a dull woman". A word of advise; don't eat there.
Some things, like movie production, New York editorializing, and federal reserving, are just best left to the Tribe.Replies: @Lot, @F0337
Speaking of tribalism:
RodRo: Mueller is starting to look into Team Trump and Carter Page’s Israel connections. Shut it down!
You see a post. You wonder who could be behind it.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/old_wire/img/upload/2013/09/06/AP110629066504/lead_large.jpg?
https://twitter.com/taylorswiftfat?lang=enReplies: @pyrrhus, @Chris Mallory, @Jokah Macpherson
Yes, no wonder Tay Tay has pitched a fit in the random direction of the Tennessee Senate race…she’s turned into a baby whale.
The comments over there at the NYT, at least if you view newest first, are overwhelmingly against the author of this piece. At the NYT!
And what country club do they belong to…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZqr-1GJIAk&feature=youtu.be&t=83
https://twitter.com/taylorswiftfat?lang=enReplies: @pyrrhus, @Chris Mallory, @Jokah Macpherson
If the guy who runs this twitter likes that anorexic look, he probably also has a thing for 10 year old boys.
A normal man looks at what he is calling “perfection” and tells her to eat a freaking sandwich.
Or, as Jennifer calls them, her “garden of delights.”
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
must lose 40 pounds minimum to look any good…
AGREED
Ah, the button is working correctly again.
A normal man looks at what he is calling "perfection" and tells her to eat a freaking sandwich.Replies: @Lot, @YetAnotherAnon
She’s already slimmed back down the past few months but has always been 10/10.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
Or, pretty damn close. Maybe a coupla weeks away.
A normal man looks at what he is calling "perfection" and tells her to eat a freaking sandwich.Replies: @Lot, @YetAnotherAnon
I always hesitate to debate what a ‘normal’ man finds attractive, let’s just say this isn’t a good look IMHO.
Thighs more like a Gloucester front-row rugby forward.
LOOONG way between that and 'anorexic'
As Henry Ford would say, herstory is bunk.
Of course, the two situations are not comparable. Williams was playing a game of tennis. Her rôle was to play tennis, keep her mouth shut (or at any rate not badmouth the referees), and abide by the referees' decisions. This is generally called "sportsmanship." (Uh-oh! "Gendered language!"). Kavanaugh was testifying in his defense at a hearing. His rôle was to speak on his behalf, which necessarily in that context means arguing against the accusations. His strident words, if one insists on characterising them as such, were entirely appropriate to the venue. Williams' were not at all. (Indeed, words from her had no place at all in that venue.)
Truly, logic and objective analysis of the matter at hand are to be utterly disregarded in favour of hysterical emotions in the eyes of Weiner et al.. They've no grasp of the concept that what is appropriate in one context may not be appropriate in another. We shout and act a bit silly and obnoxious at parties on New Year's Eve or rock 'n' roll concerts. We keep quiet, or, perhaps, weep and wail (maybe even hysterically; that's okay and understandable) at funerals. We wear shorts to the beach, but suits in courtrooms. And so on. This stuff is not complicated.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
You’re giving these people a lot of credit …
… for honesty, that is. OK, some ARE just really stupid.
It’s always the lament, “How do I explain WXYZ to my daughters?”
Who does this to their children? It appears as a form of child abuse by projecting the parent’s child-like insecurity/naivety/disappointment/narcissism/neuroticism on to the child.
We have no more grown-ups.Replies: @TheJester
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
Beached whale.
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
She looks like Ezra Levant in drag.
I could be wrong, but I thought in Europe (or the UK) newspapers identify with a political orientation and the public knows in advance which way a paper leans. In the USA almost all of the news outlets try to appear as though they are professional, unbiased journalists who just report the facts. But it is clear that this is not the case.
So many more articles and opinions appear in the NYT that take the position Judge K. is bad. They also seem to run many articles where they lament that a small majority (53%) of white women are voting GOP, while ignoring ridiculously lopsided voting by other blocs for the democrats.
They aren’t doing anything illegal, but shouldn’t they come out and admit they are an organ of the democrat party just to eliminate any pretense that they are neutral, unbiased reporters?
I wonder how much of our political situation cones from the number of people who examine their presuppositions versus the number of people whose political thinking is however far they got as they learned to drive.
Part of the Trumpening has been that the mainstream media has been so damned obvious -- and has reacted to its failures by doubling down -- that they require no label.
How will her daughters explain Jennifer Weiner to THEIR kids?
https://twitter.com/taylorswiftfat?lang=enReplies: @pyrrhus, @Chris Mallory, @Jokah Macpherson
I seem to remember reading somewhere that weight gain ran in her family and her slender figure was somewhat anomalous, so I guess heredity is a hell of a thing.
Ladies, can you please make up your minds?
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy’s Latest Atrocity.
It’s one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.
When this was being sold circa 1970, the marketing scam was that women were going to gain new freedoms, but in turn be responsible for themselves. Hence they'd actually be like "partners" for men--no longer would be have to pull their weight--and it would be win, win.
LOL.
The freedom part arrived. Actually being responsible for anything? -- even themselves? Fuggetaboutit.
Feminism: maximum freedom for women; maximum responsibility for men.Replies: @Anonymous, @ben tillman
On the radio last week they ran a clip of a group of females protesting Kavanaugh’s pending appointment. It was like listening to hysterical nursery school kids and the thought crossed my mind that whoever edited the news broadcast to include this clip either did so deliberately or was totally devoid of even a shred of irony.
Jennifers born in the 1950s tend to be smart and serious. Those born after Love Story came out are anything but.
If your mother was into Love Story, that’s not a good sign of your parentage. By that time, more literate parents had shied away from the name.
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy's Latest Atrocity.
It's one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Chrisnonymous, @William Badwhite, @AnotherDad, @Desiderius
They’re thoroughly consistent. It’s whatever strategy pays off at the moment.
Lana Lokteff Expresses Understandable Sarcasm Towards Pop Star Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift Launched An Unprovoked Attack Upon The State Of Tennessee
Taylor Swift Viciously Attacked US Senate Candidate From Tennessee Marsha Blackburn
The Lovely And Smart Lana Lokteff Don’t Think Much Of Attacks On Marsha Blackburn
https://twitter.com/LanaLokteff/status/1049328432159629313
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
Not even with your ****!
Didn’t we all diss this land whale recently?
Nah. Fatty Swift wasn’t 10/10. Also, she looked a lot better when I could fantasize that she was a closet Trump supporter…
TS is an 8/10. Too much makeup and moves real awkwardly.
Is there a sentence in that piece where she quotes her precocious 3 year old? “Mommy, why is that man on the TV lying?”
Totally fabricated, of course.
What’s with the ingratiating head tilt in all her photos? I did enjoy the large number of comments on the article that were pro “innocent until proven guilty”.
The other day there was a shill thread on 4chan where the OP claimed to be a real journalist and offered a media analysis that was much less sophisticated than that normally seen on /pol/. It was pretty much what I had when I was a young teenager: check the fine print and we discover that your local paper is owned by, of all the things, a corporation! [throws local paper on the ground] He then repeated the phrase “right wing slant” many times without ever clarifying or giving examples, beyond one in which police corruption was under-reported; the normal /pol/ complaint about media bias takes the form of going straight to examples and letting the preponderance of the evidence do the work.
I wonder how much of our political situation cones from the number of people who examine their presuppositions versus the number of people whose political thinking is however far they got as they learned to drive.
Part of the Trumpening has been that the mainstream media has been so damned obvious — and has reacted to its failures by doubling down — that they require no label.
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy's Latest Atrocity.
It's one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Chrisnonymous, @William Badwhite, @AnotherDad, @Desiderius
This is your binary, linear, patriarchal white male privilege speaking. Wow, just wow. I can’t even.
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy's Latest Atrocity.
It's one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Chrisnonymous, @William Badwhite, @AnotherDad, @Desiderius
Mrs. Badwhite said something to this effect the other day. For the record she believes Kav but also said even if Blasey was telling the truth, that it wasn’t that big of a deal – teenage girls going to drinking parties with hormonal teenage boys might have to sometimes fend said boys off. BFD. Now if the boy won’t stop, that’s different.
Blasey squeaked “I thought they were going to rape me”. Mrs. Badwhite: “Yeah? Well they didn’t. That part is important.”
Mrs. Badwhite: “I’m irritated that as a woman I’m supposed to be so fragile and delicate that some boy jumping on me 35 years ago would scar me for life; on the other hand of course I’d make a good Marine or cop”.
Because she didn't go to the police at the time, a real-deal rape claim would have frayed her wide swathe of supporters from a functioning coalition into a status contest about who is more victimized than thou. It's heavier artillery but with the trade-off of laying down a marker. So instead she went with being frightened she would be raped, a/k/a emotional "trauma."
Manipulative women chasing popular succor know to keep things hazy and to emote rather than countenance the physically or chronologically-moored evidence. Once the masses slide off into a regrettable stuckness on the facts, no agitprop scandal can survive, cf. Trayvon Martin shooting.
The medium is the message, and we get it.
Loud and angry women are loud and angry, and we are so aware of how loud and angry the loud and angry women are that we now wear hearing protectors.
So, loud and angry women are not being ignored. They are being honored by our deference to them .They speak so that we may remain silent. In our soundproof rooms.
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
Sober.
RodRo: Mueller is starting to look into Team Trump and Carter Page's Israel connections. Shut it down!
http://crownheights.info/assets/media/featured/20110510-chasid.jpgReplies: @Anonym, @Colin Wright
Lol.
You see a post. You wonder who could be behind it.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/old_wire/img/upload/2013/09/06/AP110629066504/lead_large.jpg?
I have designed a robot that will listen to loud, angry and emotional women and nod approvingly now and then, say “I’m sorry” now and then and apologize for all men.
Only $2,599.
I think I will make a killing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGcRz9jJJCU
If the suffering of Jennifer Weiner is not a joke, then why are all of us laughing at it?
In what's left of America, as in all remotely free societies, people are innocent until proven guilty, and unsubstantiated ravings do not constitute probative evidence.
There; that was a quick and easy conversation.Replies: @Kylie
But what about how Dr. Blasey feels?
You are ignoring her when she has the right to have her feelings validated.
And in essence you are saying that nothing happened to her.
Blah…blah…blah…I could go on–I didn’t even get to the white man/patriarchy/ oppression stuff but it’s all so excruciatingly dull.
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy's Latest Atrocity.
It's one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Chrisnonymous, @William Badwhite, @AnotherDad, @Desiderius
You nailed the crux of it.
When this was being sold circa 1970, the marketing scam was that women were going to gain new freedoms, but in turn be responsible for themselves. Hence they’d actually be like “partners” for men–no longer would be have to pull their weight–and it would be win, win.
LOL.
The freedom part arrived. Actually being responsible for anything? — even themselves? Fuggetaboutit.
Feminism: maximum freedom for women; maximum responsibility for men.
Simple, a weiner is chopped mystery meats encased in a thin membrane. A Wiener is a person from the city of Vienna.
Carla Danger.
Emotional, loud, angry women should use jazz hands instead of shouting so they don’t upset the autistic children.
The murderous, terroristic rhetoric is also a form of empowerment, I guess? I blame Wonder Woman and Game of Thrones.Replies: @Kylie
These emotional, loud, angry women have been socialized. They just haven’t been civilized.
Right now, I’m sitting in a restaurant, listening to an autistic manchild scream at the top of his lungs.
Is it sad that I find him more articulate and well-spoken than the protesters at the Kavanaugh hearings?
Any relation to Anthony???
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
I second your motion Ben Kenobi but raise her to 4/10
Oh what the hell. Two beers.
Congratulations on marrying well. Live long and prosper.
Mrs. B views a lot of this through the prism of "what if something like this happened to my father/husband/sons?"
TS a closet Trump supporter, maybe until Kanye started going MAGA. I think that Grammy thing still smarts.
TS is an 8/10. Too much makeup and moves real awkwardly.
I think it was pretty crucial to CBF’s future as a Democratic celebrity/mascot that her averred story had her NOT getting raped. The proceedings would have gone quite differently if she were asserting otherwise (regardless of this underlying story’s actual truth).
Because she didn’t go to the police at the time, a real-deal rape claim would have frayed her wide swathe of supporters from a functioning coalition into a status contest about who is more victimized than thou. It’s heavier artillery but with the trade-off of laying down a marker. So instead she went with being frightened she would be raped, a/k/a emotional “trauma.”
Manipulative women chasing popular succor know to keep things hazy and to emote rather than countenance the physically or chronologically-moored evidence. Once the masses slide off into a regrettable stuckness on the facts, no agitprop scandal can survive, cf. Trayvon Martin shooting.
Looks like she’s got four ample ones—she could supply a whole Ben & Jerry’s ice cream line! Any thoughts out there on flavor names? For consideration:
Because they’re safer and more prosperous than Diverse and Vibrant nations?
When this was being sold circa 1970, the marketing scam was that women were going to gain new freedoms, but in turn be responsible for themselves. Hence they'd actually be like "partners" for men--no longer would be have to pull their weight--and it would be win, win.
LOL.
The freedom part arrived. Actually being responsible for anything? -- even themselves? Fuggetaboutit.
Feminism: maximum freedom for women; maximum responsibility for men.Replies: @Anonymous, @ben tillman
i.e., staying a spoiled 12-year-old princess forever.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
Just imagine what it looks like without 3 layers of Spanx wrapped around it.
You don’t. If he’s the big bad rapist and paedophile the Dems have made him out to be, he’ll come around some night to explain it himself.
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
With or without bag?
I can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t take “women’s suffering” seriously.
I mean, it’s not as if western women are the most privileged demographic in recorded history, with nearly unlimited handouts, set-asides, “women in X” programs, white knights waiting in the wings, instant access to alpha males and safe, air-conditioned, low-responsibility jobs.
It’s not as if most of the women complaining have never gone through the pain of childbirth, and, God willing, probably never will.
It’s not as if western women falsely accuse men of assorted forms of abuse at staggering rates, often for attention or money or to deflect criticism from some terrible thing they themselves did.
It’s not as if western women have made themselves both contestants and referees in the grand game of life, and are still never satisfied at the outcome.
What could it possibly be? Why don’t these terrible bigots automatically hand over their wallets and their balls to the first woman who walks along claiming to have been wronged?
It’s inexplicable.
It’s THIS year!
With a love/hate relationship you have the love and the hate, the hatefully-concealed love, the love-labeled haterade, and 1001 more variations in journalism, pedagogy, history, the arts, academia, etc., etc., etc.
Hell, a modern Jew could waste his or her whole life on this crap. What else are they going to do with their time and boundless energy.. Cure polio? Be fruitful and multiply? Nah..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2NABd23_jI
I mean, it's not as if western women are the most privileged demographic in recorded history, with nearly unlimited handouts, set-asides, "women in X" programs, white knights waiting in the wings, instant access to alpha males and safe, air-conditioned, low-responsibility jobs.
It's not as if most of the women complaining have never gone through the pain of childbirth, and, God willing, probably never will.
It's not as if western women falsely accuse men of assorted forms of abuse at staggering rates, often for attention or money or to deflect criticism from some terrible thing they themselves did.
It's not as if western women have made themselves both contestants and referees in the grand game of life, and are still never satisfied at the outcome.
What could it possibly be? Why don't these terrible bigots automatically hand over their wallets and their balls to the first woman who walks along claiming to have been wronged?
It's inexplicable.Replies: @L Woods, @kaganovitch
Unfortunately, most men are saps that will do just that.
Iow Jewish women like herself.
Imagine how successful Hans Stern, Oscar Niemeyer, Joseph Safra, etc. would have been had they not lived in diverse and vibrant Brazil.
Thank you sir. My advice to anyone considering marriage is to make sure your intended has a good relationship with and respects her father. Also that her father is someone deserving of respect.
Mrs. B views a lot of this through the prism of “what if something like this happened to my father/husband/sons?”
I mean, it's not as if western women are the most privileged demographic in recorded history, with nearly unlimited handouts, set-asides, "women in X" programs, white knights waiting in the wings, instant access to alpha males and safe, air-conditioned, low-responsibility jobs.
It's not as if most of the women complaining have never gone through the pain of childbirth, and, God willing, probably never will.
It's not as if western women falsely accuse men of assorted forms of abuse at staggering rates, often for attention or money or to deflect criticism from some terrible thing they themselves did.
It's not as if western women have made themselves both contestants and referees in the grand game of life, and are still never satisfied at the outcome.
What could it possibly be? Why don't these terrible bigots automatically hand over their wallets and their balls to the first woman who walks along claiming to have been wronged?
It's inexplicable.Replies: @L Woods, @kaganovitch
You men are such bastards! It’s too cold in the office and the women have to wear cardigans! All so the Patriarchy can be comfortable! And don’t get me started on the pea under the mattress …
Like Steve and says about Black three-namers apparently being unaware of the last 50 years (Heather Mac Donald has a related rant), you’d think these female advocates feel that women don’t have the vote and sew all the family clothes. Women in the United States now are pretty near the historical pinacle for the species in their freedom and rights. There’s an analogy to the uncanny valley here, where the closer you get to perfection, the greater whatever shortcoming exists seems to appear, I suppose.
Related to this, women complain that male doctors ignore their medical complaints, which is not true: They are given antidepressants, which treat what is really the problem. But my prediction: Expect more and more female diseases to be “validated” despite the lack of any underlying organic, bacterial, viral, or chemical abnormality. Medicine will become, Believe the Woman! This will play out in the workplace with special rights for “sick” women, and also in the educational sphere. Savvy men will also start to come down with these conditions. Universal basic income may turn out to be unnecessary: Everyone will have the equivalent in lifetime “disability” payments.
This is shocking blame-the-victimism under current standards:
Women have the right to get falling down drunk without getting raped. Demand that the world around you change rather than changing your own behavior!
To get something for cheap or free, you have to convince the owner that his stuff has low value. So, he might as well just hand it over.
– you need to know you are incorrect.
Because we’re by far the best-looking people on the planet, that’s why.
Also, we are a wealth-generating machine and they like wealth (OPM).
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
Aim high, gentlemen. Aim high.
Meme-worthy
In addition to zero awareness, these people have zero social skills.Replies: @AndrewR, @ThreeCranes
Being loud, angry and emotional obviously is not the same as being disrespectful. I am rather astounded that you need this spelled out for you.
Having said that, there is a relatively high correlation.
You are either badasses who need a man like a fish needs a bicycle, or you are basket cases looking for a place to pull your car over so you can cry and scream for 20 minutes about the Patriarchy's Latest Atrocity.
It's one or the other. You are not a badass if you weep at the thought of the latest Supreme Court nominee (while a teenager) feeling someone up at a pool party.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Chrisnonymous, @William Badwhite, @AnotherDad, @Desiderius
Nice question, wrong sex.
Some things, like movie production, New York editorializing, and federal reserving, are just best left to the Tribe.Replies: @Lot, @F0337
I knew you were half-Jewish but it turns out the other half is NAZI!!!
Yep, even I had to notice the Thick Thighs she’s rockin’
LOOONG way between that and ‘anorexic’
If only we had her (brilliant) synopsis instead of the past several weeks, we’d be a much healthier nation.
Only $2,599.
I think I will make a killing.Replies: @F0337
It’s been done
Hey….I’m thinking Constitutional Amendment….
Judging from their articles and social media, liberals apparently spend most of their day trying to explain controversial current events to their children. (Or else they can’t think of a less clichéd way to frame their ideas.)
But seriously, just tell them to do their homework and go to bed. Problem solved.
If that doesn’t work, give them the latest edition of the New York Times, which will tell them exactly what to think.
Alright boys, who’s gonna jump on this grenade and make her do a Laci Green here?
Since Kav denied the whole thing ever happened, the controversy naturally ended up being about credibility.
But even in her version it wasn’t a rape or even a plausible attempted rape. Basically some laughing, fully clothed, juvenile wrestling at a party.
Worst case scenario, someone copped a feel of her boobie over her clothes.
Not ideal to be sure. But do we really have to call her a “survivor,” like she was in Auchwitz?
The New York Times:
‘How Do I Explain Justice Kavanaugh to My Daughters?’
Jennifer Weiner
Given the name and the source, I’m sure it all fits seamlessly into what you’ve been teaching them all along. I wouldn’t fret.
‘The spectacle of this confirmation has reminded us that to many people, women’s suffering is a joke.’
To many of us, the notion that Ms. Ford’s rather trivial experience is what constitutes ‘suffering’ is something of a bitter joke.
I am in awe at the lives apparently devoid of real trauma and pain that figures such as Ms. Weiner must live.
This is shocking blame-the-victimism under current standards:Women have the right to get falling down drunk without getting raped. Demand that the world around you change rather than changing your own behavior!Replies: @Colin Wright
‘…Women have the right to get falling down drunk without getting raped. Demand that the world around you change rather than changing your own behavior!’
I think you’re actually serious.
Demand away. Reality won’t change. Here’s an unpleasant truth. Good girls go to heaven; bad girls get raped.
You can deplore that fact. It remains a fact.
RodRo: Mueller is starting to look into Team Trump and Carter Page's Israel connections. Shut it down!
http://crownheights.info/assets/media/featured/20110510-chasid.jpgReplies: @Anonym, @Colin Wright
‘RodRo: Mueller is starting to look into Team Trump and Carter Page’s Israel connections. Shut it down!’
This has happened before; it’s where the ‘Russia’ investigation always freezes, backs up, and tries to reload.
3/10.
Would bang.Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Redneck farmer, @OilcanFloyd, @F0337, @the one they call Desanex
I’m gonna link to my Jennifer Weiner limerick one more time. I thought it was pretty good. Comment #76.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/jennifer-weiner-i-want-to-burn-the-frat-house-of-america-to-the-ground/#comment-2532659
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
Michelin woman in high heels. Hope springs eternal.
Taylor, I see a muumuu beckoning in your future.
But even in her version it wasn't a rape or even a plausible attempted rape. Basically some laughing, fully clothed, juvenile wrestling at a party.
Worst case scenario, someone copped a feel of her boobie over her clothes.
Not ideal to be sure. But do we really have to call her a "survivor," like she was in Auchwitz?Replies: @Pericles
Well, when you put it like that … maybe we do!
In addition to zero awareness, these people have zero social skills.Replies: @AndrewR, @ThreeCranes
Those women get ignored because emotion, loudness and anger are not useful in a court of law; are, in fact, inimical to the process of discovering and administering justice. On the other hand, quiet consideration of verifiable evidence followed by detached deliberation are useful. Perhaps she should try them.
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/news/160919/jennifer-weiner-435.jpg
If she lost a few pounds (not too many actually) she'd likely have a pretty nice figure. Like a lot of women with large boobs the body doesn't discriminate enough with the fat placement and just sort of throws it to the front abdomen area in general.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/stljewishlight.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/70/6705d286-9094-11e6-8b06-8752180b57e2/57fe5d320e2d4.image.jpg
No comment.Replies: @Anonym, @BenKenobi, @pyrrhus, @Anonymous, @virgil, @ThreeCranes
If it takes a truck scale to weigh ’em, I’ll pass.
Above is a better photo to demonstrate. May just be post-children though.Replies: @Anon, @DFH, @Achmed E. Newman, @Forbes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Pericles, @ThreeCranes
For a moment I thought I was looking at Melania, so tall and elegant. Then I saw her high heels and realized that she was as wide as she was tall and my desire left me.
Problem is, weak-brained liberal women–and that means most of them–have a poor grasp of Logic and take this to mean, “therefore, if I’m not well-behaved, I will make history”. Armed with this bit of sophistry they defend their lack of manners and misbehavior as being the manifestations of Genius and any male who protests is standing in the way of Progress.
Similar to the sign some women hang in their kitchens “A clean house is the sign of a dull woman”. A word of advise; don’t eat there.
Insight from a former girlfriend of mine (an eleven), when you see a woman wearing baggy clothes, it means she’s trying to hide her overweightnessness.
The second I read this article, I thought of this scene.
How do you explain it to your daughters? The same way you undoubtedly explain. abortion, homosexuality is a healthy alternative, and how to be a good transgender advocate. I’m sure you have no trouble explaining any of that to your children. Right after the court justice speech explain how gays make babies.
“reminded us that to many people, women’s suffering is a joke.”
It has forever been thus. Imagine the horror of being impregnated by an incubus and there being doubters?
Having a social support network of like-minded similarly acculturated people who who care for you, believe your stories and defend you is very important, unless of course that support group is whites defending their own culture and people from defamation and scapegoating in which case it is hate.
Advice to ranters:
(If that doesn’t work, then you throw vases. Or shoot people.)
John Lennon once referred to a half-Jewish half-German employee as a “member of the Chosen People and the Master Race.”
Who does this to their children? It appears as a form of child abuse by projecting the parent's child-like insecurity/naivety/disappointment/narcissism/neuroticism on to the child.Replies: @Steve from Detroit
Spot on. This used to be something only a small percentage of people (intellectuals/professors) would do to their children. Now, for liberals, it’s mandatory at all levels and it is bleeding over to people who are not necessarily liberals. We used to live in a society that told children to ignore certain things, but now we can’t ignore anything. Nothing. Everything requires a response, and the more emotional the better. It’s partly due to the ubiquity of the internet and cable news, exacerbated by 10 year old children with phones. Mostly, however, it is the times we live in, over feminization and the fact that no one acts with any comportment anymore.
We have no more grown-ups.
Every parent who has a teenage girl knows the routine. It's a contest. The more emotion that she can bring to a "thing" means that she is right and everyone else is wrong. A perfect paradigm of this is the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.
This is the price that society pays for gender equality. Going forward, it adds organizational friction and a lot of drama for everything affected by the normalization of women into traditional male activities. However, going forward, women will be close to 50% of the vote ... they are here to stay and they are gluttons for attention.
A way will have to be found to console them when the Male Patriarchy doesn't give them the attention they believe they deserve ... to avoid something as emotional, loud, and angry as the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.
To many of us, the notion that Ms. Ford's rather trivial experience is what constitutes 'suffering' is something of a bitter joke.
I am in awe at the lives apparently devoid of real trauma and pain that figures such as Ms. Weiner must live.Replies: @Jack D
This is at the root of it. These women have been taught that the highest, most noble status belongs to “victims” and “survivors” and the worst people are “the privileged”. But when they look in the mirror they see someone who looks kind of “privileged” herself – to an outsider (say a black person in the ghetto) the life of a Becky doesn’t seem to be much different or oppressed than that of a Chad. Same house, same nice schools, same access to $, etc. BF seems just as “privileged” as that horrible man, Brett. They have to get some Victim Pokemon Points of their own to put some distance between themselves and Brett and give themselves some street cred with the CotF. Portraying yourself as a “rape survivor” or impaired by the invisible (what is it with these people and invisible?) glass ceiling is a great way to do this.
Where’s the lie, tho? (White) women’s suffering kinda is a joke. At least, the stuff they’re bitching about in Big Media, anyway; real suffering, pleb suffering, is probably way too icky to talk about.
Four beer minimum.
Oh what the hell. Two beers.
Taylor keeps putting on the pounds, pretty soon she and HRC can share outfits. If not more. IYKWIM.
A woman like that will both be glad for the experience and do her best to make up the wife/bang gap with enthusiasm.
When this was being sold circa 1970, the marketing scam was that women were going to gain new freedoms, but in turn be responsible for themselves. Hence they'd actually be like "partners" for men--no longer would be have to pull their weight--and it would be win, win.
LOL.
The freedom part arrived. Actually being responsible for anything? -- even themselves? Fuggetaboutit.
Feminism: maximum freedom for women; maximum responsibility for men.Replies: @Anonymous, @ben tillman
And, on the other hand, they get to work in an office 40 hours a week on top of all the “women’s work” they still have to do at home. Both sexes were scammed, and both are worse off.
We have no more grown-ups.Replies: @TheJester
Are you saying we have morphed into a society of 16-year old girls going “hormonal”?
Every parent who has a teenage girl knows the routine. It’s a contest. The more emotion that she can bring to a “thing” means that she is right and everyone else is wrong. A perfect paradigm of this is the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.
This is the price that society pays for gender equality. Going forward, it adds organizational friction and a lot of drama for everything affected by the normalization of women into traditional male activities. However, going forward, women will be close to 50% of the vote … they are here to stay and they are gluttons for attention.
A way will have to be found to console them when the Male Patriarchy doesn’t give them the attention they believe they deserve … to avoid something as emotional, loud, and angry as the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.