The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
And Then They Came for MLK ...
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Or at least Martin Luther King’s Pulitzer-winning biographer David Garrow is #MeTooing the icon. Garrow is a heavyweight left-of-center historian. I’ve read his gigantic Obama biography Rising Star. (Here’s Garrow on Obama’s cocaine use.)

From the Daily Mail:

Writing in British magazine Standpoint, Garrow says that the shocking files could lead to a ‘painful historical reckoning’ for the man who is celebrated across the world for his campaign against racial injustice.

It’s interesting that there apparently wasn’t much interest in this topic in the U.S. media world that Garrow, an American writer, is publishing in Britain.

Along with many US civil rights figures, King was subject to an FBI campaign of surveillance ordered by Director J Edgar Hoover in an effort to undermine his power amid fears he could have links to the Communist Party. …

The FBI surveillance tapes detailing his indiscretions are being held in a vault at the U.S. National Archives and are not due for release until 2027.

But David Garrow, a biographer of King who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 1987 book Bearing the Cross about the Baptist minister, has unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents.

So Garrow hasn’t listened to the tapes, but he has read FBI agents’ write-ups of the contents of the tapes, which doesn’t seem all that definitive. This doesn’t sound too new overall, but apparently there are new details.

 
Hide 342 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. ive always wondered, who can declassify tapes ahead of 2027? another fed judge? Trump? why dont they?

    • Replies: @Lot
    It is probably a statue and can’t be changed outside act of congress.

    Census date becomes public after 70 years. Other stuff 20, 50, 70 years after someone’s death.

    , @Jack Hanson
    Trump is invested in the Boomer worship of all things black. Republicans will probably be out the gate denouncing this as a Dem smear.
  2. Generally speaking, black people get a pass on #MeToo, so I think he will be safe.

    • Replies: @DuanDiRen
    You couldn't be more wrong. At the high school and college level, the most overrepresented group of men getting #MeToo'd are black guys. They are more likely to be accused, less likely to lawyer up properly when accused, and women are more vindictive about it. Heartiste could probably explain why.
    , @BB753
    Dunno. Colby's in jail and Weinstein seems to be able to walk away free.
    , @George Taylor
    In Denver's upcoming Mayoral run off campaign. The Black incumbent Mayor Michael Hancock has had several #metoo moments. He is currently running against a White women, both are liberals as they would be in blue Denver, but Mayor Hancock fearing for his political future has pulled out the race card. The ?, will the race card trump #Metoo, will know in a couple of weeks. https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/premium/uproar-over-race-engulfs-denver-mayoral-candidate-jamie-giellis-video/article_1b8b76a4-7867-11e9-b90f-3f64982d46bb.html
  3. It’s not new news. But the fact that a lefty heavyweight is #metooing MLK is a very big development, and so is the fact that he read the reports.

    The left can respond by either:

    1.) Start the process of calling for the tearing down of all MLK statues–and, if they are feeling really ambitious, all street signs bearing MLK’s name.

    or

    2.) Ignore of dismiss this as boring, since the smoking gun is still more than 7 years away.

    Pretty easy bet.

    • Agree: 95Theses
    • Replies: @216
    Replacing MLK Jr with James Baldwin in the Prog Pantheon is the likely outcome.

    Baldwin was odiously anti-white, and gay. No color-blind speeches to throw off the message of resentment.
  4. Isn’t all that definitive? What’s that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents’ notes of the tapes?

    • Replies: @Sextus Empiricus
    “What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents’ notes of the tapes?”

    ‘cuz Mahtun, bruh.

    , @Lugash
    1960s FBI agents were very, very straight laced. It's not impossible that they could have misinterpreted sexual banter.

    Does anyone have the link to the actual article in Standpoint? Odd that a DSA member is writing in what appears to be an alt-right-lite mag.
    , @Anonymous
    It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone "Rape on Campus!" article. The "sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman" part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.

    The FBI has a tendency to exaggerate (or outright fabricate) evidence against those it dislikes; human nature combined with the thuggish authoritarian tendencies inherent to people attracted to that line of work. It's important to remember that King was not regarded as a saint like he is today; he was a troublemaker who was politically radical and angered a large number of important people. We've seen what the FBI does (or tries to do) to loud-mouthed subversives.
    , @Dr. X
    Rockwell confronting King, 1965:

    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qIz6FyZ5aPk/U16RkWisswI/AAAAAAAAI-U/VUGyF9XgqE4/s1600/American+Nazi+Party+leader+George+Lincoln+Rockwell+confronting+Martin+Luther+King+Jr.,+1965.jpg
    , @Barnard
    The 40-45 "affairs" number is a significant undercount based on King's own words. Unless they are only counting women he had ongoing relations with not those he only saw once. I think Garrow is telling a fib about being shocked by these reports. He is the one who reported the "I'm on the road 25-27 nights a month, fornicating* is a form of anxiety reduction for me" quote. None of this is surprise to people who have seriously read about King's life, to the masses who blindly believe the sainthood narrative they here in school, it might be though.
  5. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:

    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn’t cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @bomag
    I imagine the info is out there in print somewhere. KGB archives, if nothing else.

    I've always figured he was the face and voice of a movement. His chaotic personal life doesn't promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.

    The Left covers for their icons much better than the Right. I was always puzzled by Robert Byrd's ability to be taken seriously.
    , @onetwothree
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100210013055/http://martinlutherking.org/

    Welcome to the Internet. Enjoy your stay.
    , @bob sykes
    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.
    , @Lugash
    The Wayback Machine is your friend:

    https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://martinlutherking.org
    , @PV van der Byl
    Ted Pappas, editor of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, has probably done more than any other person in documenting the dubiousness of MLK's doctorate:
    Plagiarism and The Culture War : The Writings of Martin Luther King, Jr, and Other Prominent Americans https://www.amazon.com/dp/0873190459/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_uMf7Cb790DSMJ
    , @David In TN
    By 1968 MLK wasn't that important anymore. The Memphis garbage worker strike was considered a big defeat. Then he was killed and became a martyr.
  6. Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed…

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    They could cover the 'King' and rename the streets for the Protestant reformer ... wait, never mind.
    , @Sextus Empiricus
    “Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed…”

    Well, let’s see, we already have an old tradition of naming roads and such after presidents, and a newer tradition of naming roads and such after prominent mixed-blood fellas, so what person who fits both categories would be monomaniacally narcissistic enough to destroy the legacy of MLK and put a lot of street names up for reconsideration?

    Barack H. Obama Blvd., anyone?
    , @TontoBubbaGoldstein
    Think of how many U2 songs will need to be rewritten!!

    I want to run, I want to hide
    I want to tear down the walls that hold me inside
    I wanna reach out and touch the flame
    When the streets are renamed

    I want to feel sunlight on my face
    I see that dust cloud disappear without a trace
    I wanna take shelter from the poison rain
    When the streets are renamed, oh oh
    When the streets are renamed
    When the streets are renamed

    , @Anonymous
    Were heading to an 84 style where the streets have no name scenario.

    Street of The Diverse !
    , @Harry Baldwin
    If they rename all the Martin Luther King Boulevards, how will anyone know where to go to buy hard drugs when they're in a strange town?
    , @Hibernian
    They won't be.
  7. in 2027 why would they open the files?

    democrats will be in full, permanent control of the US by then, so they’ll seal the records forever, or wipe them “Like with a cloth or something”.

    speaking of that, why did the trump administration push back the tubman $20 to 2026? why not just cancel it outright? the next democrat administration will start printing tubman 20s almost right away, then move on to replacing all the other bills and coins next, so why even pretend to go along with what the previous democrats wanted? democrats NEVER do this. they just cancel the republican projects.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    2026 is probably enough time to where the 20 dollar bill will be worth what a fiver is now. I'll just carry Benjamins and Hamiltons (unless they fill him in black) and refuse twenties as change, along with Lincolns, as I don't respect him any more than Harriet Tubman.

    Or, I'll wear cargo pants and fill those big pockets with quarters.

  8. I thought that FBI agents were all heros – stalwart, upright defenders of the Republic, protecting it from the clutches of the unworthy. Here they were keeping tabs on a known russia-stooge and p**sy-grabber. How can anyone questions the actions of these members of the “intelligence community”.

    • Replies: @bored identity
    Revenue King wuz Michael Jackson of MLKongism.
  9. anon[825] • Disclaimer says:

    The archives are sealed, but a writer “unearths” them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    • Replies: @vinteuil

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
     
    So should anybody go to jail for the publication of the supposedly sealed divorce records of Blair Hull & Jack Ryan?

    Like that could ever happen.

    What kind of a world do you think that we are living in?
    , @Anon

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
     
    Nobody leaked any archives. The tapes are still under wraps.

    The FBI summary documnts that the writer obtained were from the 19,000-document tranche of JFK assasination-related documents that came out last year under the John F. Kennedy Records Act of 1992.

    Wikipedia:


    On April 26, NARA released another 19,045 documents in accordance with President Trump's order. These releases include FBI, CIA, and other agency documents (both formerly withheld in part and formerly withheld in full) identified by the Assassination Records Review Board as assassination records. While no more documents required to be released under section 5 remain withheld in full, some still remain withheld in part and will not be declassified until 2021.
     
    These documents follow a number of document releases under the Act in 2017. This was all carried out with bombastic tweets from the president, which made the news, so you may remember it.

    The reason why MLK stuff was released is that the JFK Records Act defined "assasination-related" very broadly. It was passed shortly after Oliver Stone's febrile conspiracy movie, and some legislators were convince that there was stuff being hidden. You may remember a similar situation with Roswell and Area 51, where Congress ordered the Air Force to compile a huge report about aliens, or the lack thereof.

    , @Pericles

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.

     

    That would put the New York Times out of business, and we can't have that.
    , @CAL2
    To unearth does not mean he did anything illegal. In true gov't fashion, they probably locked up the tapes but misplaced the tape summaries.
    , @Almost Missouri

    "the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things"
     
    It was also anti-civil rights.

    Pre-"Civil Rights" Movement: Freedom of Association
    Post-"Civil rights" Movement: GONE

    Pre-"Civil Rights" Movement: Freedom of Trade
    Post-"Civil rights" Movement: GONE

    Pre-"Civil Rights" Movement: Freedom of Speech
    Post-"Civil rights" Movement: GOING...GOING...
    , @Federalist

    but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
     
    Why?

    The people that cover up things like this and lie to us should go to jail, or worse.
    , @Jake
    The 'civil rights' movement was in origin, back to Abolitionism and the Emancipation Proclamation and Reconstruction, about the Yank WASP Elites acting to break and subdue the whites they most feared and hated. Jews took that culture war to a whole new level, starting slowly with the 1920s, and exploding in 1948.

    The 1950s-60s civil rights movement was Cultural Marxism before anybody guessed at the slightly new concept, much less named it.
  10. This won’t get MSM coverage until Trump tweets a stupid comment. And then they will just #Me Too Trump again. MLK is not going anywhere.

    • Agree: TWS, Forbes
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The wokerati are way to the left of King on race. Content of their character really sticks in their craw.
    , @Forbes
    I agree on the premise: no MSM coverage, and MLK is not going anywhere.

    This holds because MLK's actual legacy of racial comity has been pushed aside and forgotten due to the adoption and enforcement of racial identity politics.

    MLK: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

     

    In other words, MLK remains a totem, but an empty one as his message has been long ignored.
  11. @Federalist
    Isn't all that definitive? What's that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents' notes of the tapes?

    “What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents’ notes of the tapes?”

    ‘cuz Mahtun, bruh.

  12. @Buffalo Joe
    This won't get MSM coverage until Trump tweets a stupid comment. And then they will just #Me Too Trump again. MLK is not going anywhere.

    I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The wokerati are way to the left of King on race. Content of their character really sticks in their craw.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    Nah, they'll just bring up the Playboy interview were he supports affirmative action.
    , @Buffalo Joe
    Desi, not disputing what you are saying, but who would have thought there was "left" to the left of King on race, other than militant activists.
  13. Maybe the left is ready to drop Martin.

    Most of the time he is invoked today, it’s by some white conservative who is trying to tamp things down and is probably nostalgic for the days of the “non-violent negro Christian semi-rational protestor”.

    Meanwhile I think the fellas these days find Denzel, oh, I mean, Malcolm the more compelling figure to emulate.

  14. And then they came for FFA:

    FFA failing to connect with farming needs of the future, ag teacher says

    Sorry, we’ve used our quota of free reads, so someone else will have to supply the details.

    • Replies: @Sextus Empiricus
    I read it - I’m sure you can guess the details.
    , @Redneck farmer
    FFA isn't doing enough to recruit Hispanics, and apparently Hmong. Also, Future Farmers of America became just FFA in 1988, not 1998. I know because I was in when that happened.
  15. @Federalist
    Isn't all that definitive? What's that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents' notes of the tapes?

    1960s FBI agents were very, very straight laced. It’s not impossible that they could have misinterpreted sexual banter.

    Does anyone have the link to the actual article in Standpoint? Odd that a DSA member is writing in what appears to be an alt-right-lite mag.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    King's behavior was well documented at the time-in small right wing publications affiliated with "known racist groups" or with the John Birch Society, which was not racist and kicked its most acdemically distinguished founder, Revilo P Oliver, out for being racist (he really was) but had a very serious case of cooties.

    Oliver suspected that the JBS actually was financed by Rockefellers and other established globalist forces. This seemed to make no sense until the principle of cooties is understood. Works just like "radiation pressure" in a thermonuclear warhead. They couldn't keep the activities of the CFR, Bilderbergers, et all secret so they themselves told all-but associated it with cooties so it would be rejected, even though true.


    That grown adults run in terror from cooties seems unbelievable, but evidence seems to prove it.
    , @The Z Blog
    This is a great example of left-wing conditioning. You have been convinced that people in the past were dumb and naive, so it is OK to ignore them.

    It is how the Left detaches people from their history and from observable reality.
  16. @Reg Cæsar
    And then they came for FFA:


    FFA failing to connect with farming needs of the future, ag teacher says


    Sorry, we've used our quota of free reads, so someone else will have to supply the details.

    I read it – I’m sure you can guess the details.

    • Replies: @bomag
    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.


    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

     

    I've thought farming got a pass because it's too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas
     
    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let's watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.
  17. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lugash
    1960s FBI agents were very, very straight laced. It's not impossible that they could have misinterpreted sexual banter.

    Does anyone have the link to the actual article in Standpoint? Odd that a DSA member is writing in what appears to be an alt-right-lite mag.

    King’s behavior was well documented at the time-in small right wing publications affiliated with “known racist groups” or with the John Birch Society, which was not racist and kicked its most acdemically distinguished founder, Revilo P Oliver, out for being racist (he really was) but had a very serious case of cooties.

    Oliver suspected that the JBS actually was financed by Rockefellers and other established globalist forces. This seemed to make no sense until the principle of cooties is understood. Works just like “radiation pressure” in a thermonuclear warhead. They couldn’t keep the activities of the CFR, Bilderbergers, et all secret so they themselves told all-but associated it with cooties so it would be rejected, even though true.

    That grown adults run in terror from cooties seems unbelievable, but evidence seems to prove it.

    • Replies: @Rich
    Shame Americans didn't choose Oliver over Buckley back when the country still had a chance.
  18. MLK’s sexual indiscretions have been an open secret for decades.

    The British MSM isn’t as PC, so this type of stuff is more mentionable over there.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    Indeed--going back to the 60s. The American MSM, however, has long since elevated King to sainthood so--it's all moot. It'll be entertaining though to watch all the usual suspects twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend King (watch Hoover get a ritual spanking) before pulling the inevitable race card. Perhaps we might even see an appearance from MacArthur Genius Coates himself.
    , @David In TN
    Jack Anderson went into some detail about King's sexual transgressions in a column around 1969-70. And Anderson was widely read in those days. A history teacher (I was a college sophomore at the time) read the column in class. He was a liberal democrat, though not a hard-line leftist.

    This negative piece on MLK was not widely discussed at the time.
  19. @Desiderius
    I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The wokerati are way to the left of King on race. Content of their character really sticks in their craw.

    Nah, they’ll just bring up the Playboy interview were he supports affirmative action.

    • Replies: @Bruce County
    I luagh when people bring that little tidbit of history up. The Playboy interview. I for one have read it many times times. He's a stark raving fucking lunatic. Like this part.
    Playboy: Along with the other civil rights leaders, you have often proposed a massive program of economic aid, financed by the Federal Government, to improve the lot of the nation's 20,000,000 Negroes. Just one of the projects you've mentioned, however—the HARYOU-ACT program to provide jobs for Negro youths—is expected to cost $141,000,000 over the next ten years, and that includes only Harlem. A nationwide program such as you propose would undoubtedly run into the billions.

    King: About 50 billion, actually—which is less than one year of our present defense spending. It is my belief that with the expenditure of this amount, over a ten-year period, a genuine and dramatic transformation could be achieved in the conditions of Negro life in America. I am positive, moreover, that the money spent would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils.

    Playboy: If Negroes are also granted preferential treatment in housing, as you propose, how would you allay the alarm with which many white homeowners, fearing property devaluation, greet the arrival of Negroes in hitherto all white neighborhoods?

    King: We must expunge from our society the myths and half-truths that engender such groundless fears as these. In the first place, there is no truth to the myth that Negroes depreciate property.
    There are more juicy bits one can laugh at..Heres the link if anyone needs to expel their coffee onto the monitor..
    https://playboysfw.kinja.com/martin-luther-king-jr-a-candid-conversation-with-the-n-1502354861
  20. Well the fervor to rename buildings named after slave owning founders and Confederates might down a bit as a result of these findings.

  21. David Garrow, white male, initiates process of #metooing Martin Luther King, Jr.

    I don’t think he has thought this through.

    • LOL: Kylie
  22. I predict the story will vanish without a trace in the US. MLK sainthood and all that goes with it is too good of a moneymaking tool, and weapon to use against non-minorities, for the keepers of the sainthood to give it up.

    • Agree: bomag, Bruce County, TTSSYF
    • Replies: @Anon
    Garrow's magisterial (i.e., really long) Obama bio, while not exactly scandalous, did take him down a few notches and made him look like a bit of a dick and a phony, and it was pretty quickly memory holed.

    However, the timing might have had something to do with it. Too late for those interested in the current president, and to early for history buffs.
  23. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.

    I imagine the info is out there in print somewhere. KGB archives, if nothing else.

    I’ve always figured he was the face and voice of a movement. His chaotic personal life doesn’t promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.

    The Left covers for their icons much better than the Right. I was always puzzled by Robert Byrd’s ability to be taken seriously.

    • Replies: @Jack D

    His chaotic personal life doesn’t promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.
     
    He didn't have a "chaotic personal life", he was just a horndog. This is quite common among high-T alphas, starting with silverback gorillas in 1 Million BC, continuing onto Oriental potentates, JFK, Johnny Edwards and S. African black politicians in the present day. Such people, even if they are men of the cloth themselves, are completely impervious to Christian teaching concerning monogamy. They are responding to a higher power - the biological imperative that that most fit males fertilize every female in sight in order to strengthen the fitness of the species. Christian teaching, with its principles of monogamy and fidelity, is great for betas because it means that (nearly) every beta will have a female available to him but it is no great bargain for alphas who would much prefer to sow their seed widely, which is the "natural" order of things.
    , @Simply Simon
    I believe Robert Byrd was taken very seriously by Republicans and Democrats. He was one of the longer serving senators and for many years chair of the Appropriations Committee. If a fellow senator wanted something appropriated for his district he had to pay obeisance to Mr Byrd. He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I'believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland. He was an expert on parliamentary rules and used that to his advantage many times during floor debate, In the long gone days when I watched Senate proceedings on C-Span Bryd was the picture of the well-groomed and manicured Southern politician dwelling at great length on obscure subjects and often reciting lengthy poems from memory. For an ex-Klansman the old boy did quite well.
  24. @Reg Cæsar
    And then they came for FFA:


    FFA failing to connect with farming needs of the future, ag teacher says


    Sorry, we've used our quota of free reads, so someone else will have to supply the details.

    FFA isn’t doing enough to recruit Hispanics, and apparently Hmong. Also, Future Farmers of America became just FFA in 1988, not 1998. I know because I was in when that happened.

    • Replies: @Faraday's Bobcat
    That's a good example of what I call Everything Is About Everything. It's like the Berkeley City Council feeling the need to have a foreign policy. Now, FFA could stand for Future Farmers of America, or it could stand for Flaming Fruitcakes of Alabama, or Fiscally Frugal Aztecs.

    It all started in 2004 when the congressional General Accounting Office changed to the Government Accountability Office. Accounting is just too narrow a scope for ambitious bureaucrats. Why limit yourself to boring double-entry bookkeeping and fiduciary whatsis, when you can take on Government Accountability? The sky's the limit!
  25. @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    They could cover the ‘King’ and rename the streets for the Protestant reformer … wait, never mind.

  26. Alleged daughter and her mother won’t talk to Garrow? Unless the daughter is childless, this will eventually come out, in these Sally Hemmings DNA times.

  27. I want hear the audio of King telling that dirty joke about Jackie at JFK’s funeral.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    I'm not sure that happened at the funeral, per se. Three months after the assassination, King was in a wiretapped hotel room in Los Angeles, and recorded footage of the funeral was on the TV.

    Here's a 2001 book that references the incident . Garrow and Taylor Branch have both written about it in other books.


    https://books.google.com/books?id=_peZip6-DUgC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=martin+luther+king+%22Hyatt+House%22+1964+Kennedy&source=bl&ots=Y5qEVE8heK&sig=ACfU3U20oGMbTswgce2ujAIaiMqUyOaIMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifpcOH3rviAhWrrVkKHfYWDkYQ6AEwDnoECAcQAQ

    Scroll down for an account of the incident.

  28. @Sextus Empiricus
    I read it - I’m sure you can guess the details.

    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.

    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

    I’ve thought farming got a pass because it’s too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas

    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let’s watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    I'm worried that they'll "improve" the FFA Creed next. "For I believe rural America can and will hold true to the best traditions of our national life, and hope to do my part in that inspiring task".(Final line of the FFA creed) How unwoke is that? No one the Ivies don't want FFA members!
    , @Almost Missouri

    "I’ve thought farming got a pass because it’s too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come."
     
    99%+ of the Left has zero strategic vision. They just do whatever Pavlovian response they are trained on: white man bad, black woman good, etc.

    As the history of the Left in Eurasia shows, they will cheerfully famine their nose to spite the normies' face.
    , @Buffalo Joe
    bomag, "Dress code", you mean overalls and shit kicker boots. I see those on lots on diverse guys when I drive thru the inner city. Of course they are not referred to as "work clothes."
    , @Known Fact
    Future farmers "who don't subscribe to conventional gender norms?" I think we have a potential Green Acres reboot on our hands here
  29. @JimDandy
    It's not new news. But the fact that a lefty heavyweight is #metooing MLK is a very big development, and so is the fact that he read the reports.

    The left can respond by either:

    1.) Start the process of calling for the tearing down of all MLK statues--and, if they are feeling really ambitious, all street signs bearing MLK's name.

    or

    2.) Ignore of dismiss this as boring, since the smoking gun is still more than 7 years away.


    Pretty easy bet.

    Replacing MLK Jr with James Baldwin in the Prog Pantheon is the likely outcome.

    Baldwin was odiously anti-white, and gay. No color-blind speeches to throw off the message of resentment.

    • Replies: @Lot
    There’s a Baldwin debate at Oxford Union that you will see lefties describe like the second coming of Lincoln or Cicero.

    I watched it, and he was just awful, style, content, everything. He just droned on and on.

    And yet the upper class Englishmen in the audience, born circa 1948, awarded him with massive applause.

    In other words, the Ta of his generation.
    , @JimDandy
    Possible problem with that: He presented as bi, and was often accompanied by women. Beards or not, who knows? Maybe he got drunk and cracked one over the head with an absinthe bottle.
    , @JohnnyD
    Angela Davis would also be a good candidate.
  30. @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    “Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed…”

    Well, let’s see, we already have an old tradition of naming roads and such after presidents, and a newer tradition of naming roads and such after prominent mixed-blood fellas, so what person who fits both categories would be monomaniacally narcissistic enough to destroy the legacy of MLK and put a lot of street names up for reconsideration?

    Barack H. Obama Blvd., anyone?

  31. The best way to keep the left from tearing down various and sundry monuments and cultural icons, both literally and metaphorically, is to let it be known that MLK is fair game. It might be necessary to take him down a peg or two to put things back in proper perspective. Now that the society is imploding, it behooves white America to stop being so nice and fifty years on, rub their noses in the same shit that the rest of us have had to endure.

    It is incredibly important that when the MLK files due to be opened up in 2027 that they are actually released. My guess is that there will be the mother of all battles to keep them suppressed for all the obvious reasons. If they are, there will be 100 years of a multicultural boot stomping in white America’s face. If they are released, assuming they are as bad as I am guessing, it might be possible to have an ‘understanding’ among the races each others icons are off limits. Just replace “I have a dream” with “where are the white women?”. Turn about is fair play.

    • Replies: @Pericles
    "I have a dream ... of white women."
  32. The movie Barbershop came out in 2002, so this is old hat.

  33. Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we’d have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?

    • Replies: @fish

    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we’d have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?
     
    .....nailed it.
    , @Joe Magarac

    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we’d have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?
     
    To protect informants.

    There is no way they could have this information without someone very close to King.

    My guess is that there are no great big new revelations about King himself, but that the big deal will be knowing who was the snitch. Or who were the snitches.

    Jesse Jackson perhaps?
  34. @ScarletNumber
    Generally speaking, black people get a pass on #MeToo, so I think he will be safe.

    You couldn’t be more wrong. At the high school and college level, the most overrepresented group of men getting #MeToo’d are black guys. They are more likely to be accused, less likely to lawyer up properly when accused, and women are more vindictive about it. Heartiste could probably explain why.

  35. Anonymous[243] • Disclaimer says:

    King was subject to an FBI campaign of surveillance ordered by Director J Edgar Hoover in an effort to undermine his power

    If these allegations were really true, wouldn’t they have published them when they were trying to “undermine King’s power”?

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    That's not quite true. Hoover was carrying out orders from his boss, AG Robert Kennedy, who was carrying out orders from his boss/brother President Kennedy. JFK issued a covert Executive Order to surveil King in October, 1963. The primary reason was King's Communist ties, which the Kennedys had repeatedly warned King about, to no avail.

    Both Garrow and Taylor Branch, to name two King biographers, have recounted, in previous books, some published many years ago, similar sex stories based on FBI transcripts, including February 22, 1964 tapes from an L.A. trip, taped at a hotel where King, viewing on TV some recorded footage of JFK's funeral (it was the 3 month anniversary of his death) laughed at seeing Jackie kiss the casket. King supposedly said that she kissed the coffin in the middle because "that's the part she'll miss most" and made other snide references to her fellating JFK's corpse.

    If memory serves, that trip to L.A. also captured tapes of an orgy King participated in.

    Hoover told Bobby about King's JFK comments, BTW, and Bobby told Jackie, hence the "mysterious" reason why Jackie was on record as having little use for King.

    Those and other biographers have also referenced in their books a hushed up scandal from King's trip to Oslo to accept his Nobel Prize. Members of his entourage, including his brother-another "reverend", had parties with hookers. The party went south and cops were called. Not sure if MLK was a participant or not, but---what do you think? King's henchman Bayard Rustin defused the incident with the hotel people and cops by playing the race card.

    , @Yngvar

    If these allegations were really true, wouldn’t they have published them when they were trying to “undermine King’s power”?
     
    The FBI did publish them at the time and it was all lies. During COINTELPRO the FBI fabricated a lot of stuff about subversives and "leaked" it to friendlies.
  36. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out, because they do not engage with critics, so gaping logic holes are never plugged. For instance, when it was pointed out that they were being racist to whites (Saul Alinsky rule 4, “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules”), they came up with “racism cannot be directed at whites, because they have power.” When it’s pointed out that whites do not have power, on campuses, they revert to Yes they do and shut up.

    Anyway …

    Has anyone ever framed the European colonization of the Americas explicitly as economic and political migrantion while comparing that to modern day migrants in Europe and the southern U.S. border? In other words, the Indians were racist, xenophobic NIMBYs keeping out the underprivileged?

    There would be so many hilarious parallels:

    — Europeans brought diseases. But isn’t that a racist trope used today (measles, tuberclulosis, ebola)?

    — Europeans came in huge numbers, or had many children: But attempts today at numerical limits are criticized.

    — Indians became a minority in their own country: Well, yes.

    It could go on and on.

    The flipside frame is to say that modern migrants are colonists, colonizing the countries they enter. This is said of course. But a more detail critique using campus academic colonialism theory would probably produce hilarious results.

    • Replies: @bomag
    Agree here; good points.

    But the Left is quite adept at deflecting criticism; unlike the Right, which seems to descend into "kneeling morons", promising to follow all the rules and uphold internal purity.

    E.g., pointing out to liberal acquaintances that they live and work in essentially 100% non-Black environments (cf B. Sanders; L. Warren) has no effect; they just wave it away.
    , @AceDeuce
    Indians also fought back fiercely against the invaders-raping, murdering, torturing.
    , @Almost Missouri
    How Whites Took Over America

    https://youtu.be/faNge-o0V-k

    courtesy of WhiteRabbitRadio.net
    , @Lurker

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out
     
    I think that's the central problem. Other than it's anti-white animus of course. But then I think the latter is the real issue, the rest is just a rag bag of half-thought ideas to try and justify it.
  37. @Janusm
    ive always wondered, who can declassify tapes ahead of 2027? another fed judge? Trump? why dont they?

    It is probably a statue and can’t be changed outside act of congress.

    Census date becomes public after 70 years. Other stuff 20, 50, 70 years after someone’s death.

    • Replies: @Kaganovitch
    Eh. They pull down statues all the time.
  38. Lot says:
    @216
    Replacing MLK Jr with James Baldwin in the Prog Pantheon is the likely outcome.

    Baldwin was odiously anti-white, and gay. No color-blind speeches to throw off the message of resentment.

    There’s a Baldwin debate at Oxford Union that you will see lefties describe like the second coming of Lincoln or Cicero.

    I watched it, and he was just awful, style, content, everything. He just droned on and on.

    And yet the upper class Englishmen in the audience, born circa 1948, awarded him with massive applause.

    In other words, the Ta of his generation.

    • Replies: @Whiskey
    Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That's it. Wish it were different but it is not.
    , @Paleo Liberal
    Not quite.

    TNC is an imitation of Baldwin.

    Baldwin at least wrote one pretty good book.

    TNC gets to have the reputation of being as good as people said Baldwin was.

    People can disagree as to whether Baldwin was overrated. I don’t know enough to weigh in.

    What TNC did was say “I’m the new Baldwin” and have people who should have known better fawn over him and say “yes, you are the new Baldwin so take this money from us to spread your infinite wisdom of black bodies”.

    Even worse are the TNC wannabes who throw out “black bodies” as if it were something original they came up with.

    If you think Baldwin was overrated, what do you call writers who are weak imitations of a weak imitation of Baldwin?

    , @PV van der Byl
    Are you referring to Baldwin's debate with Bill Buckley? If so, you have characterized Baldwin quite accurately.
  39. The MLK cult is the closest thing the US has to state-sponsored religion, so Garrow is wise to avoid publishing here.

    However, the King theology is getting shopworn, as it at least nominally supported equality and harmony between the races. The new progressive ideology is basically an inversion of Nazism in which white Christians must be crushed and destroyed.

    As for King himself, I doubt he had any consistent theology at all. He just stole other people’s ideas and let others write his speeches while he engaged in extremely hypocritical behavior behind the scenes.

    In that respect, he wasn’t much better than the pederast Catholic priests of his generation. Just about all you could say in his favor is “at least he wasn’t sodomizing boys.”

    • Replies: @Anon
    MLK is the new Jesus Christ.

    He died for America's sins.
    , @ben tillman

    However, the King theology is getting shopworn, as it at least nominally supported equality and harmony between the races. The new progressive ideology is basically an inversion of Nazism in which white Christians must be crushed and destroyed.
     
    It's more like what Nazism was an inversion of.
  40. @Bill P
    The MLK cult is the closest thing the US has to state-sponsored religion, so Garrow is wise to avoid publishing here.

    However, the King theology is getting shopworn, as it at least nominally supported equality and harmony between the races. The new progressive ideology is basically an inversion of Nazism in which white Christians must be crushed and destroyed.

    As for King himself, I doubt he had any consistent theology at all. He just stole other people's ideas and let others write his speeches while he engaged in extremely hypocritical behavior behind the scenes.

    In that respect, he wasn't much better than the pederast Catholic priests of his generation. Just about all you could say in his favor is "at least he wasn't sodomizing boys."

    MLK is the new Jesus Christ.

    He died for America’s sins.

  41. MLK also ripped off the “I have a dream” speech from black republican Archibald Carey. You can hear the two original deliveries compared at YouTube…for now.

  42. This will meet the same fate as all the other negative information that has come out about MLK: Historians will grudgingly acknowledge it in contexts where they have no other choice (such as books or articles aimed at a highly-informed audience in the top 2 percent of the IQ distribution), but it will mostly be passed over in silence. In the popular imagination, it will all be chalked up to Hoover and his evil, lying FBI. Unless truly damning info comes to light — film or video or DNA results — it will all be brushed aside as hearsay.

    The current political order is too heavily invested in the MLK story to just up and abandon it. That would require a massive rewriting of the narrative. Such a revision may eventually be possible — but not within the current order.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    Of course no attack on MLK's sacred memory by evil white racists is possible, but you are discounting an attack from the Left. To the Woke, MLK is an old fashioned figure who died before they were born. His advocacy of non-violence and a future where skin color would have no importance is NOT what Antifa and BLM subscribe to. Not all all. All those MLK Boulevards should be renamed Malcolm X Boulevard in their view.
  43. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Federalist
    Isn't all that definitive? What's that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents' notes of the tapes?

    It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone “Rape on Campus!” article. The “sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman” part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.

    The FBI has a tendency to exaggerate (or outright fabricate) evidence against those it dislikes; human nature combined with the thuggish authoritarian tendencies inherent to people attracted to that line of work. It’s important to remember that King was not regarded as a saint like he is today; he was a troublemaker who was politically radical and angered a large number of important people. We’ve seen what the FBI does (or tries to do) to loud-mouthed subversives.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    Right. However, when Garrow's article actually appears, we'll have a chance to evaluate his evaluation of these summaries.
    , @Bill P
    The stories about Jim Jones are pretty salacious, too, but I think they're probably true. I've personally witnessed some truly vile behavior in my day, but from things my elders told me (in a couple cases shortly before they died) about the 60s/70s I don't think I've seen all that much (in the US, at least). I don't think these accusations seem all that out of the ordinary for the times.

    Not long after I got out of high school, a man shot and killed one of the teachers at my school for sodomizing him years earlier. Another one of my teachers committed suicide when some things came to light. For quite some time people got away with a lot.

    I saw a some of this stuff in Asia around 20 years ago, but it's a different continent so it only taught me what people are capable of rather than what was going on in America during the sexual revolution, but I'm guessing it was probably the same.

    I used to read The eXile when Taibbi and Ames ran it back in the 90s, and it described a situation that looked a lot like the US in the late 60s/early 70s, and I know that, although they changed some details here and there, they were not exaggerating. I don't think most of the readers or commenters (or Steve himself for that matter) have ever really been exposed to this stuff, which is fortunate, but I think they are unaware of how utterly depraved people can be, especially when they know they can get away with it.

    So, salacious? Maybe -- depending on your perspective. But unrealistic or implausible? I don't think so. Not at all.
    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    It sounds a bit too salacious...sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman

     

    Blacks...salacious...rape? Unpossible.

    Category:Murdered rappers - Wikipedia
  44. @Lot
    There’s a Baldwin debate at Oxford Union that you will see lefties describe like the second coming of Lincoln or Cicero.

    I watched it, and he was just awful, style, content, everything. He just droned on and on.

    And yet the upper class Englishmen in the audience, born circa 1948, awarded him with massive applause.

    In other words, the Ta of his generation.

    Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That’s it. Wish it were different but it is not.

    • Agree: Cleburne, MBlanc46
    • Replies: @JimDandy
    There is a third way. I've always said (even though I have no way of actually knowing) that if I was black I would fucking hate white liberals, because they are the worst kinds of racists--condescending and superior and objectifying AND fawning. I try to hold black people to the same standard as whites--and I'm literally not capable of engaging in the type of grotesque negro-head-patting white Progressives revel in. I get along with pretty well with black people I know better than casually.
    , @BenKenobi
    Whiskey, are you saying that the negro is either at your feet or at your throat?

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    I completely agree with you......most important comment ever posted on UNZ REVIEW...
  45. anonymous[351] • Disclaimer says:

    He was black and his behavior for a black finding himself in a position of celebrity and influence was pretty much par for the course. It’s a black thing and they all know about it and accept it; they just don’t advertise it to white people. He doesn’t lose any credibility with blacks and even adds to his stature with many black males with this. Whites are shocked, shocked to hear of this.

  46. @Anonymous
    It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone "Rape on Campus!" article. The "sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman" part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.

    The FBI has a tendency to exaggerate (or outright fabricate) evidence against those it dislikes; human nature combined with the thuggish authoritarian tendencies inherent to people attracted to that line of work. It's important to remember that King was not regarded as a saint like he is today; he was a troublemaker who was politically radical and angered a large number of important people. We've seen what the FBI does (or tries to do) to loud-mouthed subversives.

    Right. However, when Garrow’s article actually appears, we’ll have a chance to evaluate his evaluation of these summaries.

  47. @216
    Replacing MLK Jr with James Baldwin in the Prog Pantheon is the likely outcome.

    Baldwin was odiously anti-white, and gay. No color-blind speeches to throw off the message of resentment.

    Possible problem with that: He presented as bi, and was often accompanied by women. Beards or not, who knows? Maybe he got drunk and cracked one over the head with an absinthe bottle.

    • Replies: @Clyde
    Yes, the Frenchies and wannabe Frenchies with their absinthe.
  48. OT, but of interest to iSteve readers — will there be no more crops rotting in the fields?

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/26/world-first-fruit-picking-robot-set-to-work-artificial-intelligence-farming

    • Replies: @Cortes
    The Goons will be taking a close look at the robot:

    “46]

    Raspberry blowing
    Edit
    As well as a comic device randomly inserted into different sketches to avoid silence, the blowing of raspberries entered the Goons as Harry Secombe's signal to the other actors that he was going to crack up; you would hear a joke from him, a raspberry, and a stream of laughter. In the Goons' musical recording "The Ying-Tong Song", Milligan performed a solo for raspberry-blower, as one might for tuba or baritone saxophone. Milligan made much use of a rather surreal Columbia 78RPM sound effects disc, catalogue number YB20, which bears the innocuous title "Donkey" on the label. Approximating possibly to the most obscene and flatulent noise ever recorded, it appeared first in the show "The Sinking of Westminster Pier" as a sound to accompany an oyster opening its shell; it thereafter became known as Fred the Oyster, and appears as such in the scripts. This recording was often used as a reaction to a bad joke. Examples include The Last Goon Show of All where Neddie shouts old jokes into a fuel tank in order to "start the show".

    Years later, Milligan collaborated with Ronnie Barker on The Phantom Raspberry Blower of Old London Town in which the credits read, "Raspberries professionally blown by Spike Milligan". David Jason has also claimed to have produced the sound effect and indeed was credited with this in the second segment of Ronnie Barker's LWT series Six Dates with Barker (1971).[47]”

    (Wikipedia)
  49. @Whiskey
    Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That's it. Wish it were different but it is not.

    There is a third way. I’ve always said (even though I have no way of actually knowing) that if I was black I would fucking hate white liberals, because they are the worst kinds of racists–condescending and superior and objectifying AND fawning. I try to hold black people to the same standard as whites–and I’m literally not capable of engaging in the type of grotesque negro-head-patting white Progressives revel in. I get along with pretty well with black people I know better than casually.

    • Replies: @Bruce County
    Jim Jim Jim...The black mind dont think that way. They even hate themselves!! They like the liberals because they are the engine that drives the machine for the Free Shit Army.
    They wont bite the hand that feeds them.
    , @anon
    I like the idea of deporting criminals. Strip them of their citizenship and deport them.
    This will reduce black demographics substantially in this country and remove the trouble-maker blacks. The blacks who remain will be law-abiding and therefore welcome.
    Over enough generations of this the black gene pool in this country will be greatly improved.
    , @L Woods
    DR3 has never and will never work.
  50. Some of the FBI reports are outlandish.

    King watched a rape one night, then a 12 person orgy the next? Just happened to happen at a hotel the FBI had illegally bugged?

    I got a feeling the agents were giving Hoover what he wanted to hear.

    • Replies: @Bill P
    What's so outlandish about that? There's nothing incongruous there.
    , @CAL2
    It's probably harder to figure out which hotels King stayed in that the FBI didn't bug than the ones they did.
  51. @The Last Real Calvinist
    OT, but of interest to iSteve readers -- will there be no more crops rotting in the fields?

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/26/world-first-fruit-picking-robot-set-to-work-artificial-intelligence-farming

    The Goons will be taking a close look at the robot:

    “46]

    Raspberry blowing
    Edit
    As well as a comic device randomly inserted into different sketches to avoid silence, the blowing of raspberries entered the Goons as Harry Secombe’s signal to the other actors that he was going to crack up; you would hear a joke from him, a raspberry, and a stream of laughter. In the Goons’ musical recording “The Ying-Tong Song”, Milligan performed a solo for raspberry-blower, as one might for tuba or baritone saxophone. Milligan made much use of a rather surreal Columbia 78RPM sound effects disc, catalogue number YB20, which bears the innocuous title “Donkey” on the label. Approximating possibly to the most obscene and flatulent noise ever recorded, it appeared first in the show “The Sinking of Westminster Pier” as a sound to accompany an oyster opening its shell; it thereafter became known as Fred the Oyster, and appears as such in the scripts. This recording was often used as a reaction to a bad joke. Examples include The Last Goon Show of All where Neddie shouts old jokes into a fuel tank in order to “start the show”.

    Years later, Milligan collaborated with Ronnie Barker on The Phantom Raspberry Blower of Old London Town in which the credits read, “Raspberries professionally blown by Spike Milligan”. David Jason has also claimed to have produced the sound effect and indeed was credited with this in the second segment of Ronnie Barker’s LWT series Six Dates with Barker (1971).[47]”

    (Wikipedia)

  52. @Whiskey
    Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That's it. Wish it were different but it is not.

    Whiskey, are you saying that the negro is either at your feet or at your throat?

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat

    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Ben, I have a bottle of JW Blue, need an ice cube though. I'm guessing Whiskey is closer to Everclear than JW Blue.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat
     
    I was going to say Ice Hole, but that's schnapps.


    http://www.horizonwarehouseliquors.com/images/P/ICE%20HOLE%20BUTTERSCOTCH%20750.jpg



    Revel Stoke, perhaps? Nah, our whisk[e]y comes in but one flavo[u]r.


    https://www.revelstokewhisky.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/FamilyshotJune2018.png
  53. The apparently new detail is the incident where another Baptist preacher holds down and rapes (One of his own congregation?) a woman who rebuffs his advances while King looks on and jokingly gives advice to the the rapist.

  54. @Anonymous
    It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone "Rape on Campus!" article. The "sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman" part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.

    The FBI has a tendency to exaggerate (or outright fabricate) evidence against those it dislikes; human nature combined with the thuggish authoritarian tendencies inherent to people attracted to that line of work. It's important to remember that King was not regarded as a saint like he is today; he was a troublemaker who was politically radical and angered a large number of important people. We've seen what the FBI does (or tries to do) to loud-mouthed subversives.

    The stories about Jim Jones are pretty salacious, too, but I think they’re probably true. I’ve personally witnessed some truly vile behavior in my day, but from things my elders told me (in a couple cases shortly before they died) about the 60s/70s I don’t think I’ve seen all that much (in the US, at least). I don’t think these accusations seem all that out of the ordinary for the times.

    Not long after I got out of high school, a man shot and killed one of the teachers at my school for sodomizing him years earlier. Another one of my teachers committed suicide when some things came to light. For quite some time people got away with a lot.

    I saw a some of this stuff in Asia around 20 years ago, but it’s a different continent so it only taught me what people are capable of rather than what was going on in America during the sexual revolution, but I’m guessing it was probably the same.

    I used to read The eXile when Taibbi and Ames ran it back in the 90s, and it described a situation that looked a lot like the US in the late 60s/early 70s, and I know that, although they changed some details here and there, they were not exaggerating. I don’t think most of the readers or commenters (or Steve himself for that matter) have ever really been exposed to this stuff, which is fortunate, but I think they are unaware of how utterly depraved people can be, especially when they know they can get away with it.

    So, salacious? Maybe — depending on your perspective. But unrealistic or implausible? I don’t think so. Not at all.

    • Agree: Kylie
  55. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:

    Some interesting details:

    The Guardian spiked the story at the last minute: SJWs pressuring from below?

    The Atlantic and the Washington Post chickened out.

    — An unnamed web magazine “whose raison d’etre is to fight for free speech” wouldn’t print it. Quillette*?

    — The FBI summaries came from among 19,000 documents released by Donald Trump in 2018 relating to the Kennedy assasination.

    — The law requiring the release of such documents was passed in the wake of Oliver Stone’s freaky conspiracy movie JFK.

    — The FBI just let a rape and other shit happen to protect sources and methods.

    — Eight percent of the membership of the U.S. Communist Party were FBI informants.

    *”Quillette is a platform for free thought. We respect ideas, even dangerous ones. We also believe that free expression and the free exchange of ideas help human societies flourish and progress. Quillette aims to provide a platform for this exchange.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    — The FBI summaries came from among 19,000 documents released by Donald Trump in 2018 relating to the Kennedy assasination.
     
    4D chess as they say
    , @keypusher
    I don't blame Quilette, they've got enough to deal with. The statistics about infiltration of far-left organizations in the 60s reminds me of the old joke that on the internet, the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents.
  56. @Lot
    Some of the FBI reports are outlandish.

    King watched a rape one night, then a 12 person orgy the next? Just happened to happen at a hotel the FBI had illegally bugged?

    I got a feeling the agents were giving Hoover what he wanted to hear.

    What’s so outlandish about that? There’s nothing incongruous there.

  57. @bomag
    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.


    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

     

    I've thought farming got a pass because it's too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas
     
    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let's watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.

    I’m worried that they’ll “improve” the FFA Creed next. “For I believe rural America can and will hold true to the best traditions of our national life, and hope to do my part in that inspiring task”.(Final line of the FFA creed) How unwoke is that? No one the Ivies don’t want FFA members!

  58. And Then They Came for MLK …

    Wait, is Boston’s planned huge bronze glob going to be cancelled now? I was hoping to do some surprise Heimlich body slams under the sculpture next summer.

    https://www.cnn.com/style/article/embrace-mlk-memorial-boston-intl-scli/index.html

    • Replies: @bomag

    [the Embrace] dedicated to civil rights pioneers Martin Luther King Jr. and his wife Coretta Scott King...
     
    LOL. I wonder if there will be a different embracee announced every week.

    English said that he created King Boston in September 2017 as he had become "depressed and worried about some of the racism" which had emerged in America, and wanted his city to "do something positive" to show that there are still people who care about racial equality.
     
    Public art as therapy. We all must wail and gnash our teeth at the subject of the day.
  59. @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.

    So should anybody go to jail for the publication of the supposedly sealed divorce records of Blair Hull & Jack Ryan?

    Like that could ever happen.

    What kind of a world do you think that we are living in?

    • Replies: @anonymous
    A world in which one of its most effective journalists has been indicted for espionage.
  60. • Replies: @George
    Unlike Gaza there does not seem to be a desire by North African locals to overthrow Spanish rule. As near as I can determine Muslim citizens of the 2 places are full citizens of Spain. The cities are called autonomous, I don't know if that is an issue.
  61. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.

    Nobody leaked any archives. The tapes are still under wraps.

    The FBI summary documnts that the writer obtained were from the 19,000-document tranche of JFK assasination-related documents that came out last year under the John F. Kennedy Records Act of 1992.

    Wikipedia:

    On April 26, NARA released another 19,045 documents in accordance with President Trump’s order. These releases include FBI, CIA, and other agency documents (both formerly withheld in part and formerly withheld in full) identified by the Assassination Records Review Board as assassination records. While no more documents required to be released under section 5 remain withheld in full, some still remain withheld in part and will not be declassified until 2021.

    These documents follow a number of document releases under the Act in 2017. This was all carried out with bombastic tweets from the president, which made the news, so you may remember it.

    The reason why MLK stuff was released is that the JFK Records Act defined “assasination-related” very broadly. It was passed shortly after Oliver Stone’s febrile conspiracy movie, and some legislators were convince that there was stuff being hidden. You may remember a similar situation with Roswell and Area 51, where Congress ordered the Air Force to compile a huge report about aliens, or the lack thereof.

  62. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.
  63. “It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone “Rape on Campus!” article. The “sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman” part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.”

    Exactly my thought.

    For everyone saying the findings are old hat, I sure don’t recall allegations of rape.

  64. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @vinteuil

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
     
    So should anybody go to jail for the publication of the supposedly sealed divorce records of Blair Hull & Jack Ryan?

    Like that could ever happen.

    What kind of a world do you think that we are living in?

    A world in which one of its most effective journalists has been indicted for espionage.

  65. @Anon
    OT

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out, because they do not engage with critics, so gaping logic holes are never plugged. For instance, when it was pointed out that they were being racist to whites (Saul Alinsky rule 4, "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules"), they came up with "racism cannot be directed at whites, because they have power." When it's pointed out that whites do not have power, on campuses, they revert to Yes they do and shut up.

    Anyway ...

    Has anyone ever framed the European colonization of the Americas explicitly as economic and political migrantion while comparing that to modern day migrants in Europe and the southern U.S. border? In other words, the Indians were racist, xenophobic NIMBYs keeping out the underprivileged?

    There would be so many hilarious parallels:

    -- Europeans brought diseases. But isn't that a racist trope used today (measles, tuberclulosis, ebola)?

    -- Europeans came in huge numbers, or had many children: But attempts today at numerical limits are criticized.

    -- Indians became a minority in their own country: Well, yes.

    It could go on and on.

    The flipside frame is to say that modern migrants are colonists, colonizing the countries they enter. This is said of course. But a more detail critique using campus academic colonialism theory would probably produce hilarious results.

    Agree here; good points.

    But the Left is quite adept at deflecting criticism; unlike the Right, which seems to descend into “kneeling morons”, promising to follow all the rules and uphold internal purity.

    E.g., pointing out to liberal acquaintances that they live and work in essentially 100% non-Black environments (cf B. Sanders; L. Warren) has no effect; they just wave it away.

  66. @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.

    That would put the New York Times out of business, and we can’t have that.

  67. @Prof. Woland
    The best way to keep the left from tearing down various and sundry monuments and cultural icons, both literally and metaphorically, is to let it be known that MLK is fair game. It might be necessary to take him down a peg or two to put things back in proper perspective. Now that the society is imploding, it behooves white America to stop being so nice and fifty years on, rub their noses in the same shit that the rest of us have had to endure.

    It is incredibly important that when the MLK files due to be opened up in 2027 that they are actually released. My guess is that there will be the mother of all battles to keep them suppressed for all the obvious reasons. If they are, there will be 100 years of a multicultural boot stomping in white America's face. If they are released, assuming they are as bad as I am guessing, it might be possible to have an 'understanding' among the races each others icons are off limits. Just replace "I have a dream" with "where are the white women?". Turn about is fair play.

    “I have a dream … of white women.”

  68. @Jenner Ickham Errican

    And Then They Came for MLK ...
     
    Wait, is Boston’s planned huge bronze glob going to be cancelled now? I was hoping to do some surprise Heimlich body slams under the sculpture next summer.

    https://www.cnn.com/style/article/embrace-mlk-memorial-boston-intl-scli/index.html

    https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/q_auto,w_727,c_fit/http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F190305110003-01-mlk-csk-monument-design.jpg

    [the Embrace] dedicated to civil rights pioneers Martin Luther King Jr. and his wife Coretta Scott King…

    LOL. I wonder if there will be a different embracee announced every week.

    English said that he created King Boston in September 2017 as he had become “depressed and worried about some of the racism” which had emerged in America, and wanted his city to “do something positive” to show that there are still people who care about racial equality.

    Public art as therapy. We all must wail and gnash our teeth at the subject of the day.

  69. MLK was a Wilt Chamberlain level pus-hound. And at least in streaks, he liked them young. My bet would be that at a minimum, while he was a Civil Rights preacher traveling to do selfless good and become the Black Messiah, MLK had his way with several hundred females, 2 or 3 dozen of which were underage.

    There also was a lot of dope in the MLK inner circle, far more than most people can imagine possible before Woodstock. And definitely more than a bit of sodomy, including pederasty.

    Making MLK your moral icon is like making Sly Stone your professor of Moral Philosophy with Little Richard his confessor.

    Which 2 groups made MLK that moral icon? It sure as all Hell was not any form of white southerner. It wasn’t Irish Catholics, or Italian or Polish or Czech/Slovak or Croatian or Spanish or Portuguese or Mexican Catholics. It wasn’t any Eastern Orthodox. It wasn’t lower midwestern Scots-Irish.

    It was WASP Elites and Jews. Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    Didn't know about the drugs but--wouldn't be surprised. Nevertheless, bingo!!
  70. @prime noticer
    in 2027 why would they open the files?

    democrats will be in full, permanent control of the US by then, so they'll seal the records forever, or wipe them "Like with a cloth or something".

    speaking of that, why did the trump administration push back the tubman $20 to 2026? why not just cancel it outright? the next democrat administration will start printing tubman 20s almost right away, then move on to replacing all the other bills and coins next, so why even pretend to go along with what the previous democrats wanted? democrats NEVER do this. they just cancel the republican projects.

    2026 is probably enough time to where the 20 dollar bill will be worth what a fiver is now. I’ll just carry Benjamins and Hamiltons (unless they fill him in black) and refuse twenties as change, along with Lincolns, as I don’t respect him any more than Harriet Tubman.

    Or, I’ll wear cargo pants and fill those big pockets with quarters.

  71. So the summaries are available? I haven’t heard this before. Why aren’t they on the web?

  72. Is it true that many of the women MLK had affairs with were White?

  73. @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    Think of how many U2 songs will need to be rewritten!!

    I want to run, I want to hide
    I want to tear down the walls that hold me inside
    I wanna reach out and touch the flame
    When the streets are renamed

    I want to feel sunlight on my face
    I see that dust cloud disappear without a trace
    I wanna take shelter from the poison rain
    When the streets are renamed, oh oh
    When the streets are renamed
    When the streets are renamed

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas
    Early morning, April 4
    Shot rings out in the Memphis sky
    Free at last, they took your life
    They could not take your piece on the side
  74. @Anonymous

    King was subject to an FBI campaign of surveillance ordered by Director J Edgar Hoover in an effort to undermine his power
     
    If these allegations were really true, wouldn't they have published them when they were trying to "undermine King's power"?

    That’s not quite true. Hoover was carrying out orders from his boss, AG Robert Kennedy, who was carrying out orders from his boss/brother President Kennedy. JFK issued a covert Executive Order to surveil King in October, 1963. The primary reason was King’s Communist ties, which the Kennedys had repeatedly warned King about, to no avail.

    Both Garrow and Taylor Branch, to name two King biographers, have recounted, in previous books, some published many years ago, similar sex stories based on FBI transcripts, including February 22, 1964 tapes from an L.A. trip, taped at a hotel where King, viewing on TV some recorded footage of JFK’s funeral (it was the 3 month anniversary of his death) laughed at seeing Jackie kiss the casket. King supposedly said that she kissed the coffin in the middle because “that’s the part she’ll miss most” and made other snide references to her fellating JFK’s corpse.

    If memory serves, that trip to L.A. also captured tapes of an orgy King participated in.

    Hoover told Bobby about King’s JFK comments, BTW, and Bobby told Jackie, hence the “mysterious” reason why Jackie was on record as having little use for King.

    Those and other biographers have also referenced in their books a hushed up scandal from King’s trip to Oslo to accept his Nobel Prize. Members of his entourage, including his brother-another “reverend”, had parties with hookers. The party went south and cops were called. Not sure if MLK was a participant or not, but—what do you think? King’s henchman Bayard Rustin defused the incident with the hotel people and cops by playing the race card.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    What was Gay Bayard doing there?.
  75. @Anon
    OT

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out, because they do not engage with critics, so gaping logic holes are never plugged. For instance, when it was pointed out that they were being racist to whites (Saul Alinsky rule 4, "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules"), they came up with "racism cannot be directed at whites, because they have power." When it's pointed out that whites do not have power, on campuses, they revert to Yes they do and shut up.

    Anyway ...

    Has anyone ever framed the European colonization of the Americas explicitly as economic and political migrantion while comparing that to modern day migrants in Europe and the southern U.S. border? In other words, the Indians were racist, xenophobic NIMBYs keeping out the underprivileged?

    There would be so many hilarious parallels:

    -- Europeans brought diseases. But isn't that a racist trope used today (measles, tuberclulosis, ebola)?

    -- Europeans came in huge numbers, or had many children: But attempts today at numerical limits are criticized.

    -- Indians became a minority in their own country: Well, yes.

    It could go on and on.

    The flipside frame is to say that modern migrants are colonists, colonizing the countries they enter. This is said of course. But a more detail critique using campus academic colonialism theory would probably produce hilarious results.

    Indians also fought back fiercely against the invaders-raping, murdering, torturing.

  76. Since King was directly confronting law enforcement agencies, state governments, and other powerful organizations and individuals in the name of an ideology that put the spotlight on the lawlessness of those in power, it’s hard to imagine there was ever a time when he did not suspect that his conversations were being surreptitiously recorded for use against him. Certainly by 1964, the date of the most disturbing reports Garrow covers, he must have known that Hoover’s FBI was watching him closely.

    So why would he go on talking and acting in this way? It goes beyond sheer arrogance or thoughtlessness; he must have had some kind of psychological compulsion, an overwhelming desire to be caught and punished, even if that meant taking his friends and his cause down with him. That in turn casts a stark light on his ideas. No longer is King just one more preacher who failed to live up to his lovely words of moral instruction. If the most famous American advocate of nonviolence as a way of life was a masochist with a drive to seek his own destruction and that of everyone who trusted him, he becomes a powerful argument against pacifism. What he presented as peace would simply be another form of violence.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    So why would he go on talking and acting in this way? It goes beyond sheer arrogance or thoughtlessness; he must have had some kind of psychological compulsion, an overwhelming desire to be caught and punished, even if that meant taking his friends and his cause down with him. That in turn casts a stark light on his ideas. No longer is King just one more preacher who failed to live up to his lovely words of moral instruction. If the most famous American advocate of nonviolence as a way of life was a masochist with a drive to seek his own destruction and that of everyone who trusted him, he becomes a powerful argument against pacifism. What he presented as peace would simply be another form of violence.
     
    You are overthinking this. Michael King (his real legal name) was a pretty typical negro of relatively pure blood. Not thinking of the future beyond the next night. Wanting to be punished MIGHT have been Swaggart's issue, but not King's. King's was no future time orientation and being a tool of outside agitators and manipulators with little motivation besides a desire for adulation and pussy.
  77. @Malcolm X-Lax
    I want hear the audio of King telling that dirty joke about Jackie at JFK's funeral.

    I’m not sure that happened at the funeral, per se. Three months after the assassination, King was in a wiretapped hotel room in Los Angeles, and recorded footage of the funeral was on the TV.

    Here’s a 2001 book that references the incident . Garrow and Taylor Branch have both written about it in other books.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=_peZip6-DUgC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=martin+luther+king+%22Hyatt+House%22+1964+Kennedy&source=bl&ots=Y5qEVE8heK&sig=ACfU3U20oGMbTswgce2ujAIaiMqUyOaIMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifpcOH3rviAhWrrVkKHfYWDkYQ6AEwDnoECAcQAQ

    Scroll down for an account of the incident.

    • Replies: @Malcolm X-Lax
    Yeah, I'm aware. If I recall correctly, Christopher Hitchens who talked to Taylor Branch about it, said the joke was along the lines of, "There she goes, down on her knees to suck him off one last time." Charming, in any case. Ironically, Caroline has been one of the fiercest guardians of MLK's reputation. I recall reading that Jackie loathed MLK to the day she died but that Caroline has been quite public in assuring everyone that Jackie held MLK in the highest regard. LOL. Yeah, sure, Caroline. She just kept it to herself for 40 years. Jackie couldn't even stand to look at pictures of MLK.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Jacqueline_Kennedy/jacqueline-kennedys-feelings-martin-luther-king-jr-revealed/story?id=14478321

  78. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.

    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    Not beyond the incompetence of the CIA to have made a martyr out of someone who would have been discredited sooner rather than later by assassinating him.
    , @Art Deco
    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    So they hire a three-time lose like James Earl Ray for the job?


    The Urban League was a social work organization that didn't invest in civil right agitation until Whitney Young was appointed executive director in 1961. Young died in 1971 and by 1983 the Urban League had retired from the public protest business. (Coretta King organized a commemorative march in 1983 and the Urban League begged off). By the time Whitney Young was on board, King had been a consequential public figure for a half-dozen years.

    CORE was from 1942 to 1966 run by its founder, James Farmer. He voluntarily departed in 1966 and was only an intermittent presence in public life from that point onward; he eventually landed a teaching job at a modest black college and remained there until his retirement in 1998.

    As for the NAACP, can you please explain why the 67 year old Roy Wilkins (whose public prominence hardly antedated King's) would order a hit on a man he'd worked co-operatively with for a dozen years?

    The Head Negro in Charge prior to King wasn't any of these men. It was Philip Randolph, who ran one of the rail unions. Randolph in 1968 was 79 years old and on the verge of retirement.
  79. Garrow…Isn’t he the guy who brought Obama’s bisexuality out into the open?

  80. @Lot
    Some of the FBI reports are outlandish.

    King watched a rape one night, then a 12 person orgy the next? Just happened to happen at a hotel the FBI had illegally bugged?

    I got a feeling the agents were giving Hoover what he wanted to hear.

    It’s probably harder to figure out which hotels King stayed in that the FBI didn’t bug than the ones they did.

  81. @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    To unearth does not mean he did anything illegal. In true gov’t fashion, they probably locked up the tapes but misplaced the tape summaries.

  82. @Federalist
    Isn't all that definitive? What's that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents' notes of the tapes?

    Rockwell confronting King, 1965:

  83. Hey speaking of ah, er historical reckonings, what does Garrow have to say about William Pepper’s forensic proof and documentation that government officials blew King’s face off, smothered him with a pillow and horked on him?

    Any new poop on the government inter-agency war council CINCSTRIKE that coordinated CIA, FBI, NSA, ODNI and The Army Security Agency (the only ones with negroes) who infiltrated King’s NGO and taped him while the 20th Special Forces Group trained civic-minded Klan wizards and stole guns for mob hit men? How bout General William Yarborough, (cue ♬ duh-duh-duh, duhduh duh-duh duhh) dispatching death squads from the 902nd Military Intelligence Group, with NSA SR-71 blackbirds, Zoom, zoom! overhead as Frank Strausser of the Memphis PD whacked him and hopped in a cop car?

    Oh and what’d he say about Dem party hero Jesse Jackson, who got his senator job by fucking up the only real job he ever had, starting the gunfight to get King killed in the 902nd’s bazooka crossfire?

    • Replies: @Jack D
    Jesse Jackson was never a Senator, although he was the unpaid "Shadow Senator" from Washington, D.C. which is a non-existent position Constitutionally speaking. If they had elected him the Grand Vizier and Major Poobah of Warshington it would have had the same legal significance - i.e. none.
  84. @Mr. Anon
    I thought that FBI agents were all heros - stalwart, upright defenders of the Republic, protecting it from the clutches of the unworthy. Here they were keeping tabs on a known russia-stooge and p**sy-grabber. How can anyone questions the actions of these members of the "intelligence community".

    Revenue King wuz Michael Jackson of MLKongism.

  85. @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    “the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things”

    It was also anti-civil rights.

    Pre-“Civil Rights” Movement: Freedom of Association
    Post-“Civil rights” Movement: GONE

    Pre-“Civil Rights” Movement: Freedom of Trade
    Post-“Civil rights” Movement: GONE

    Pre-“Civil Rights” Movement: Freedom of Speech
    Post-“Civil rights” Movement: GOING…GOING…

    • Agree: L Woods
  86. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    Were heading to an 84 style where the streets have no name scenario.

    Street of The Diverse !

  87. Anon[483] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike_from_SGV
    I predict the story will vanish without a trace in the US. MLK sainthood and all that goes with it is too good of a moneymaking tool, and weapon to use against non-minorities, for the keepers of the sainthood to give it up.

    Garrow’s magisterial (i.e., really long) Obama bio, while not exactly scandalous, did take him down a few notches and made him look like a bit of a dick and a phony, and it was pretty quickly memory holed.

    However, the timing might have had something to do with it. Too late for those interested in the current president, and to early for history buffs.

  88. @Redneck farmer
    FFA isn't doing enough to recruit Hispanics, and apparently Hmong. Also, Future Farmers of America became just FFA in 1988, not 1998. I know because I was in when that happened.

    That’s a good example of what I call Everything Is About Everything. It’s like the Berkeley City Council feeling the need to have a foreign policy. Now, FFA could stand for Future Farmers of America, or it could stand for Flaming Fruitcakes of Alabama, or Fiscally Frugal Aztecs.

    It all started in 2004 when the congressional General Accounting Office changed to the Government Accountability Office. Accounting is just too narrow a scope for ambitious bureaucrats. Why limit yourself to boring double-entry bookkeeping and fiduciary whatsis, when you can take on Government Accountability? The sky’s the limit!

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    The saddest example of this I can think of is when Northwestern's legendary School of Speech succumbed and became the "School of Communication".

    As if five syllables communicate more than one. But that one had 81 years of history behind it.
  89. it’s sad that a sleazy mediocrity like King got a national holiday for blacks named after him–I would have much preferred a Louis Armstrong or Ella Fitzgerald Day. And, Steve, if the allegation of standing by as a woman was raped is true, then he’s also a felon.

  90. King was a far more Gantryish figure than anyone imagined in 1962. I’ve found that white leftoids react to references to this with the sort of emotional neuralgia Daniel Patrick Moynihan displayed in 1983 when he threw down a copy of a confidential report and shouted ‘filth’ on the floor of the Senate. Of course, it’s the conduct, not the text on the conduct, that’s filthy.

    It’s been known since that time that the FBI had recordings of adulterous trysts in it’s archives, it’s been known since 1988 that when King and his entourage traveled to Norway in 1964 to receive his Nobel prize, that they hired prostitutes and whole crew made enough of a ruckus to attract the attention of the police; Bayard Rustin (uninvolved with the hookers) happened to return to the hotel during the fracas and had to talk police officers out of arresting everyone. It’s been known since 1989 (courtesy Ralph David Abernathy) that King spent his last night on Earth in the company of three different women not his wife.

    It’s also been known since 1990 that 1/3 of the text of his doctoral dissertation was plagiarized from the work of Paul Tillich and the work of another fellow named John Boozer (something which tells you that academic theologians familiar with Tillich’s work hadn’t undertaken more than a cursory reading of that dissertation in the 35 years which elapsed between when he emerged as a public figure and when the plagiarism was discovered; btw, in that era, abstracts of dissertations were commonly found in readily available reference series and you could get microtext copies of a dissertation on request generated by a company called UMI; you could get them in a matter of days and, if you were a registered student or a faculty member, your institutional library would handle the paperwork for you; if you were researching his theology, you didn’t have to go to Boston and read the original typescript).

    The sexual dirt wasn’t known outside of people with access to the FBI data and people in King’s entourage. Richard John Neuhaus, who knew King well enough to know odd details about him not publicly acknowledged (e.g. that he smoked cigarettes) knew nothing about any of this and thought it was all calumny and innuendo until Ralph David Abernathy spilled the beans. (By contrast, Bayard Rustin’s homosexuality was known to anyone who’d ever been in the same room with him). Reflecting on it, Neuhaus later said it was less surprising than it seemed at first if you recalled that in the Christian kultursmog of the era, it was common to hear people express disdain for “morality from the waist down”.

    King’s status in public discourse and official history of the sort you see on PBS has survived all of this. It’s hard to imagine that there’s anything in the files which will have much effect unless it involves dead girls or live boys.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Jack D
    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been "re-evaluated" in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues - they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction - it's impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press - was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/06/06/ceb26236-26c3-4e08-acad-0ee3d94ba8a5/thumbnail/620x350/66352d989bc12fce0ca844809485f355/constand.jpg

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn's vote. The D's can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard - Paris is worth a Mass.
    , @Charlesz Martel
    JFK was involved in killing a couple of French hookers during a "girling" trip while on a yacht on the French Riviera. Limited details are in the book "JFK and his Women".
    It's practically never mentioned anywhere else, and murder trumps beatings and rape.
    The rules are different for some....
  91. Well….they can always build a monument to…….and re-name streets after Emmit Till…..

  92. @Whiskey
    Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That's it. Wish it were different but it is not.

    I completely agree with you……most important comment ever posted on UNZ REVIEW…

  93. @Anon
    OT

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out, because they do not engage with critics, so gaping logic holes are never plugged. For instance, when it was pointed out that they were being racist to whites (Saul Alinsky rule 4, "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules"), they came up with "racism cannot be directed at whites, because they have power." When it's pointed out that whites do not have power, on campuses, they revert to Yes they do and shut up.

    Anyway ...

    Has anyone ever framed the European colonization of the Americas explicitly as economic and political migrantion while comparing that to modern day migrants in Europe and the southern U.S. border? In other words, the Indians were racist, xenophobic NIMBYs keeping out the underprivileged?

    There would be so many hilarious parallels:

    -- Europeans brought diseases. But isn't that a racist trope used today (measles, tuberclulosis, ebola)?

    -- Europeans came in huge numbers, or had many children: But attempts today at numerical limits are criticized.

    -- Indians became a minority in their own country: Well, yes.

    It could go on and on.

    The flipside frame is to say that modern migrants are colonists, colonizing the countries they enter. This is said of course. But a more detail critique using campus academic colonialism theory would probably produce hilarious results.

    How Whites Took Over America

    courtesy of WhiteRabbitRadio.net

  94. @bomag
    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.


    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

     

    I've thought farming got a pass because it's too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas
     
    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let's watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.

    “I’ve thought farming got a pass because it’s too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.”

    99%+ of the Left has zero strategic vision. They just do whatever Pavlovian response they are trained on: white man bad, black woman good, etc.

    As the history of the Left in Eurasia shows, they will cheerfully famine their nose to spite the normies’ face.

    • Agree: Jack D, Ibound1
    • Replies: @Jack D
    Closer to home and nearer in time (like right now), Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/world/americas/cuba-rationing-sanctions.html

    Cuba has depended on having a "sugar daddy" to take care of them ever since Castro came to power. First it was the Soviets, then during the "Special Period" they nearly starved , then it was Chavez and now it is back to starvation.

    Food production is something that is highly responsive to market signals but socialists are constitutionally unable to avoid the temptation of tinkering (if you call using a sledgehammer tinkering) with markets so food production is always a "problem". And the response to a "problem" is even more "tinkering" - the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    The sad thing about this is that Cuba is a tropical paradise like South Florida - you can grow almost every plant known to man year round. Before Castro they were a major exporter of agricultural products (mainly sugar but also tobacco,livestock, rum, etc.) If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after.
  95. Garrow says that the shocking files could lead to a ‘painful historical reckoning’ for the man who is celebrated across the world for his campaign against racial injustice.

    I’ll believe it when Garrow titles his next book “I’M NOT A NEGRO TONIGHT!”: MLK Reconsidered.

    But I won’t be holding my breath. It was upon learning that the FBI had been surreptitiously spying on not just King, but any number of finger-pointing leftist worthies, that the Thousand Ventriloquist Voices of Leviathan all suddenly agreed that Hoover was not just a faggot but a faggot who paraded around his office in dresses and frocks. (Talk about a martyr for our age…!)

    They used to call such tactics headin’ em off at the pass.

  96. @Lugash
    1960s FBI agents were very, very straight laced. It's not impossible that they could have misinterpreted sexual banter.

    Does anyone have the link to the actual article in Standpoint? Odd that a DSA member is writing in what appears to be an alt-right-lite mag.

    This is a great example of left-wing conditioning. You have been convinced that people in the past were dumb and naive, so it is OK to ignore them.

    It is how the Left detaches people from their history and from observable reality.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    So are we supposed to reflexively believe the "intelligence community" now, or do we just selectively trust them when it suits our purposes?
  97. @Redneck farmer
    Nah, they'll just bring up the Playboy interview were he supports affirmative action.

    I luagh when people bring that little tidbit of history up. The Playboy interview. I for one have read it many times times. He’s a stark raving fucking lunatic. Like this part.
    Playboy: Along with the other civil rights leaders, you have often proposed a massive program of economic aid, financed by the Federal Government, to improve the lot of the nation’s 20,000,000 Negroes. Just one of the projects you’ve mentioned, however—the HARYOU-ACT program to provide jobs for Negro youths—is expected to cost $141,000,000 over the next ten years, and that includes only Harlem. A nationwide program such as you propose would undoubtedly run into the billions.

    King: About 50 billion, actually—which is less than one year of our present defense spending. It is my belief that with the expenditure of this amount, over a ten-year period, a genuine and dramatic transformation could be achieved in the conditions of Negro life in America. I am positive, moreover, that the money spent would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils.

    Playboy: If Negroes are also granted preferential treatment in housing, as you propose, how would you allay the alarm with which many white homeowners, fearing property devaluation, greet the arrival of Negroes in hitherto all white neighborhoods?

    King: We must expunge from our society the myths and half-truths that engender such groundless fears as these. In the first place, there is no truth to the myth that Negroes depreciate property.
    There are more juicy bits one can laugh at..Heres the link if anyone needs to expel their coffee onto the monitor..
    https://playboysfw.kinja.com/martin-luther-king-jr-a-candid-conversation-with-the-n-1502354861

    • Replies: @Bugg
    When some neocon or GOP establishment idiot tells you how "MLK would have been one of us today", this is the kind of thing they intentionally ignore. MLK would have been out front looking for more money, more programs, more AA. The colorblind society, judging people by the content of their character, yeah, we'll get to that later.

    Would hope in the rash to rename everything associated with our forefathers, this gives the Pete Butplugs of the world pause. Every person has his faults, none of us is prefect. Sadly that isn't very likely.
    , @Meretricious
    King does not sound stupid here--he's merely spouting the kind of crap that race hustlers thrive on--MLK, like Obama, was basically a parasite
  98. “It’s interesting that there apparently wasn’t much interest in this topic in the U.S. media ‘

    The left in US will ignore it. If you cite the daily mail article they’ll say that’s not considered a valid source by Wikipedia, the another magazine is not mainstream media..

    Reality will not upset their ideology, never has.

  99. Anonymous[739] • Disclaimer says:

    This will have minimal effect on American national politics.

    It can have some effect in Conservative Evangelical Churches that have pushed to make MLK Jr a God/Saint and denounced their own church founders as beyond the pale racists, anti Semites.

    Lutherans have renounced Martin Luther
    Mormons have renounced Joseph Smith and Brigham Young and the racial exclusions of Blacks from the Priesthood before the 1970s.
    Catholics have denounced all the anti Talmud, anti Semitic comments/polices of every Catholic Pope before ~ 1963.
    The Southern Baptist Church leadership has renounced the White South before MLK Jr. supposedly redeemed the South/USA.

    That’s life.

    • Replies: @ACommenter
    "the anti Talmud, "
    considering what the Talmud says about the Virgin Mary and Jesus, every Catholic (and Christian) should denounce it.

    I believe a lot of the anti-christianity we see from secular jews is internalized, unconsciously talmudic.
  100. @JimDandy
    There is a third way. I've always said (even though I have no way of actually knowing) that if I was black I would fucking hate white liberals, because they are the worst kinds of racists--condescending and superior and objectifying AND fawning. I try to hold black people to the same standard as whites--and I'm literally not capable of engaging in the type of grotesque negro-head-patting white Progressives revel in. I get along with pretty well with black people I know better than casually.

    Jim Jim Jim…The black mind dont think that way. They even hate themselves!! They like the liberals because they are the engine that drives the machine for the Free Shit Army.
    They wont bite the hand that feeds them.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    It's true that most of them want as much free shit as they can get, but are you kidding me about biting the hand that feeds them? That's their favorite past time. I maintain that most blacks don't like liberals--they can hate them and like the free shit at the same time.

    I sense respect from many blacks when I make it clear that I'm not a Klansman but I'm not going to kiss their asses, either. It's pretty basic animal kingdom shit, isn't it? If you put off the scent that you can and will defend yourself, you're less likely to be victimized by predators.
  101. @Art Deco
    King was a far more Gantryish figure than anyone imagined in 1962. I've found that white leftoids react to references to this with the sort of emotional neuralgia Daniel Patrick Moynihan displayed in 1983 when he threw down a copy of a confidential report and shouted 'filth' on the floor of the Senate. Of course, it's the conduct, not the text on the conduct, that's filthy.

    It's been known since that time that the FBI had recordings of adulterous trysts in it's archives, it's been known since 1988 that when King and his entourage traveled to Norway in 1964 to receive his Nobel prize, that they hired prostitutes and whole crew made enough of a ruckus to attract the attention of the police; Bayard Rustin (uninvolved with the hookers) happened to return to the hotel during the fracas and had to talk police officers out of arresting everyone. It's been known since 1989 (courtesy Ralph David Abernathy) that King spent his last night on Earth in the company of three different women not his wife.

    It's also been known since 1990 that 1/3 of the text of his doctoral dissertation was plagiarized from the work of Paul Tillich and the work of another fellow named John Boozer (something which tells you that academic theologians familiar with Tillich's work hadn't undertaken more than a cursory reading of that dissertation in the 35 years which elapsed between when he emerged as a public figure and when the plagiarism was discovered; btw, in that era, abstracts of dissertations were commonly found in readily available reference series and you could get microtext copies of a dissertation on request generated by a company called UMI; you could get them in a matter of days and, if you were a registered student or a faculty member, your institutional library would handle the paperwork for you; if you were researching his theology, you didn't have to go to Boston and read the original typescript).


    The sexual dirt wasn't known outside of people with access to the FBI data and people in King's entourage. Richard John Neuhaus, who knew King well enough to know odd details about him not publicly acknowledged (e.g. that he smoked cigarettes) knew nothing about any of this and thought it was all calumny and innuendo until Ralph David Abernathy spilled the beans. (By contrast, Bayard Rustin's homosexuality was known to anyone who'd ever been in the same room with him). Reflecting on it, Neuhaus later said it was less surprising than it seemed at first if you recalled that in the Christian kultursmog of the era, it was common to hear people express disdain for "morality from the waist down".


    King's status in public discourse and official history of the sort you see on PBS has survived all of this. It's hard to imagine that there's anything in the files which will have much effect unless it involves dead girls or live boys.

    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been “re-evaluated” in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues – they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction – it’s impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press – was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn’s vote. The D’s can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard – Paris is worth a Mass.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Cosby is a living individual who was found to have committed a discrete crime (whether he's guilty or not, I couldn't say; my wager is that some of his accusers are grifters and frauds and that all but a few of them were happy to prostitute themselves at the time and angry later when having been a receptacle for his johnson didn't improve their prospects in the entertainment world). I don't think Cosby's legal problems have much to do with his stock of intersectional Pokemon points, because these sorts of controversies erupt in regard to people quite outside such status competitions.
    , @MikeatMikedotMike
    Constand is a lesbian and admitted as much:

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/bill-cosbys-prevailing-accuser-andrea-constand-lesbian-heres-matters-185127955.html

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.
    , @JimDandy
    Yes, Andrea Constand is a lesbian. She looks like one of those "trans racialists" too--trying to be black. And she most likely lied about Cosby.

    https://www.wfmz.com/news/southeastern-pa/witness-testifies-constand-lied-about-sexual-assault-with-cosby-for-money/731410093

    https://www.theblot.com/breaking-andrea-constand-bill-cosby-accuser-liar-rooting-bill-cosby-7762800
    , @Paleo Liberal
    There were other reasons why the statues of Robert E Lee went up and stayed up in the post Civil War era, until recent times.

    The South has had a strong military tradition since colonial times. The Lee Family was a big part of that tradition.

    In the 100 years following Reconstruction, the US was involved in Indian wars, the Spanish American War, two World Wars, adventures in various third world nations, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

    It is not clear that a divided nation would have done as well in those wars. The US couldn’t say “F U crackers “ and expected to put together a viable army.

    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.
  102. @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.

    Why?

    The people that cover up things like this and lie to us should go to jail, or worse.

  103. anon[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @JimDandy
    There is a third way. I've always said (even though I have no way of actually knowing) that if I was black I would fucking hate white liberals, because they are the worst kinds of racists--condescending and superior and objectifying AND fawning. I try to hold black people to the same standard as whites--and I'm literally not capable of engaging in the type of grotesque negro-head-patting white Progressives revel in. I get along with pretty well with black people I know better than casually.

    I like the idea of deporting criminals. Strip them of their citizenship and deport them.
    This will reduce black demographics substantially in this country and remove the trouble-maker blacks. The blacks who remain will be law-abiding and therefore welcome.
    Over enough generations of this the black gene pool in this country will be greatly improved.

    • Agree: Kylie
    • Replies: @Corn
    Problem is there is no terra nullius to deport them to. If we deport our criminals to other countries they will start dumping their own on us (arguably Central America already is).

    So until Mars is terraformed....
  104. Jake says:
    @anon
    The archives are sealed, but a writer "unearths" them. Glad to see the MLK brand tarnished, but the leaker of sealed archives should go to jail.
    Also looking forward to the day when we take down MLK statues and signs, not for #MeToo reasons, but because the Civil Rights movement was anti-democratic and wrong about many things.

    The ‘civil rights’ movement was in origin, back to Abolitionism and the Emancipation Proclamation and Reconstruction, about the Yank WASP Elites acting to break and subdue the whites they most feared and hated. Jews took that culture war to a whole new level, starting slowly with the 1920s, and exploding in 1948.

    The 1950s-60s civil rights movement was Cultural Marxism before anybody guessed at the slightly new concept, much less named it.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
    Quite right, Jake. Mel Bradford and Gene Genovese were on to them before anyone else. I think McPherson’s Battle Cry of Freedom, which institutionalized the imperial myth, marked a real turning point in how the war could be discussed.
    , @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree
    You packed contrasting, irrefutable insights into this comment, accurately compressing the 200 most recent years of history into three sentences while maintaining clarity on the distinct groups of villains:

    The ‘civil rights’ movement was in origin, back to Abolitionism and the Emancipation Proclamation and Reconstruction, about the Yank WASP Elites acting to break and subdue the whites they most feared and hated. Jews took that culture war to a whole new level, starting slowly with the 1920s, and exploding in 1948.

    The 1950s-60s civil rights movement was Cultural Marxism before anybody guessed at the slightly new concept, much less named it.

     
    Jews, self proclaimed as typically rebellious, made ZERO efforts to rebel against the status quo that was black slavery in the US and worldwide because THEY WERE PROFITING FROM IT TO THE MAX as financiers, brokers, auctioneers and slaveholders.

    Abolition was EXCLUSIVELY a white Christian initiative WORLDWIDE.

    That it was primarily if not exclusively Protestant can not be denied. If the motive was more directed as an attack by WASPs on white rivals than beneficence to blacks that can't be a surprise because who among the WASPs today is insisting on what blacks really need now - standards of black conduct in 1) Christian sexual morality meaning chastity via sex only in lifelong monogamy of Christian marriage among opposite sex spouses neither of whom as a living former spouse ; 2) honor; 3) diligence over slothfulness; 4) personal responsibility over blame transfer excuses; 5) self-control over impulsive violence; 6) respectful public comportment over loud foul language; 7) disdain for criminality instead of its glorification; etc.

    That Jews transitioned from the 19th Century's most exploitative profiteers in black flesh into the 20th Centuries great exploiters of blacks in other ways beyond slavery after slavery was eliminated by WASPs, weaponizing blacks as golem against the out group Jews hate most and are targeting first in their genocidal program called "Cultural Marxism" - whites - is obvious to all, except maybe WASPs and those among the blacks who aren't heeding Farrakhan's warnings that Jews are targeting blacks for "NEXT" after whites via abortion, drugs, criminality and sexual immorality.
  105. @Jack D
    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been "re-evaluated" in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues - they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction - it's impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press - was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/06/06/ceb26236-26c3-4e08-acad-0ee3d94ba8a5/thumbnail/620x350/66352d989bc12fce0ca844809485f355/constand.jpg

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn's vote. The D's can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard - Paris is worth a Mass.

    Cosby is a living individual who was found to have committed a discrete crime (whether he’s guilty or not, I couldn’t say; my wager is that some of his accusers are grifters and frauds and that all but a few of them were happy to prostitute themselves at the time and angry later when having been a receptacle for his johnson didn’t improve their prospects in the entertainment world). I don’t think Cosby’s legal problems have much to do with his stock of intersectional Pokemon points, because these sorts of controversies erupt in regard to people quite outside such status competitions.

  106. King was subject to an FBI campaign of surveillance ordered by Director J Edgar Hoover in an effort to undermine his power

    No. He was subject to surveillance ordered by Robert Kennedy, Attorney General. And later approved by JFK/LBJ. That fact always gets lost. Jackie O has some terrible things to say about MLK, in her interviews with Historians in 1965. She probably knew about his sexual history.

    And laughing at a rape being committed in your presence, is 10x worse than just having sex orgies. If this is true, MLK reputation will be marred forever. Although, you have to ask yourself, why would a left-wing author publicize it? Answer: The left no longer needs MLK. He’s too moderate. Time to move on.

  107. Did the FBI wiretap Richard Nixon in the 60s for Kennedy and Johnson?

    Are there records?

  108. “So Garrow hasn’t listened to the tapes, but he has read FBI agents’ write-ups of the contents of the tapes, which doesn’t seem all that definitive. This doesn’t sound too new overall, but apparently there are new details.”

    Or they will simply reconfirm what others have already publicly written about King’s private life, such as Ralph Abernathy. Really, King’s personal life has been well covered for decades at this point. So when the files are finally released, perhaps the MLK day holiday can be replaced with a generic “Civil Rights Day” type of thing.

  109. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.
    • Replies: @simple_pseudonymic_handle
    I loaded this one:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20100307010615/http://www.martinlutherking.org/

    At the bottom of the page it says "Hosted by Stormfront". In his net smart book (not a great book) Howard Rheingold uses the martin luther king page hosted by stormfront as his type example of hoax material on the internet.

    It has been known to everyone who cared to look since the 1987 Bearing the Cross that King got more pussy than Frank Sinatra.
    , @Republic
    from that archive:

    Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-65.
    (book reviews) Jon Meacham

    01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62

    January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King's crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, "Stride Toward Freedom," asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex--including King's cries of "I'm f--ing for God" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!"

    Note: What is not mentioned in this article is that Martin Luther King was having sex with three White women, one of whom he brutally beat while screaming the above mentioned quotes. Much of the public information on King's use of church money to hire prostitutes and his beating them came from King's close personal friend, Rev. Ralph Abernathy (pictured above), in his 1989 book, "And the walls came tumbling down."

    Sources:

    Newsweek Magazine 1-19-1998, page 62

    "And the walls came tumbling down," by Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)
  110. @Almost Missouri

    "I’ve thought farming got a pass because it’s too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come."
     
    99%+ of the Left has zero strategic vision. They just do whatever Pavlovian response they are trained on: white man bad, black woman good, etc.

    As the history of the Left in Eurasia shows, they will cheerfully famine their nose to spite the normies' face.

    Closer to home and nearer in time (like right now), Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/world/americas/cuba-rationing-sanctions.html

    Cuba has depended on having a “sugar daddy” to take care of them ever since Castro came to power. First it was the Soviets, then during the “Special Period” they nearly starved , then it was Chavez and now it is back to starvation.

    Food production is something that is highly responsive to market signals but socialists are constitutionally unable to avoid the temptation of tinkering (if you call using a sledgehammer tinkering) with markets so food production is always a “problem”. And the response to a “problem” is even more “tinkering” – the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    The sad thing about this is that Cuba is a tropical paradise like South Florida – you can grow almost every plant known to man year round. Before Castro they were a major exporter of agricultural products (mainly sugar but also tobacco,livestock, rum, etc.) If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after.

    • LOL: bomag
    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Jack, good comment but any ice shortage in Alaska will be blamed on climate change caused by whites. I thought you got that memo.
    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after

     

    Yes, but...
    https://makeameme.org/media/templates/120/roll-safe-black-guy-pointing-at-his-head-.jpg
    You don't need ice if you don't have any groceries...

    USSR: Grocery store uncut

    Checkmate...capitalists
  111. @Mr. Blank
    This will meet the same fate as all the other negative information that has come out about MLK: Historians will grudgingly acknowledge it in contexts where they have no other choice (such as books or articles aimed at a highly-informed audience in the top 2 percent of the IQ distribution), but it will mostly be passed over in silence. In the popular imagination, it will all be chalked up to Hoover and his evil, lying FBI. Unless truly damning info comes to light — film or video or DNA results — it will all be brushed aside as hearsay.

    The current political order is too heavily invested in the MLK story to just up and abandon it. That would require a massive rewriting of the narrative. Such a revision may eventually be possible — but not within the current order.

    Of course no attack on MLK’s sacred memory by evil white racists is possible, but you are discounting an attack from the Left. To the Woke, MLK is an old fashioned figure who died before they were born. His advocacy of non-violence and a future where skin color would have no importance is NOT what Antifa and BLM subscribe to. Not all all. All those MLK Boulevards should be renamed Malcolm X Boulevard in their view.

    • Replies: @black sea
    I have a feeling those MLK Boulevards are going to be renamed Michael Brown Boulevard, Trayvon Martin Boulevard, Eric Garner Boulevard, Freddie Gray Boulevard, and lots and lots of Emmitt Till Boulevards.
    , @Cleburne
    That’s right. Because after all MLK was a True Conservative. Like Harriet Tubman and probably Nat Turner soon enough. David French will explain and instapundit will link.
  112. Just thought of something that could count as a “shocking” revelation. Suppose on the FBI tapes that will be released to the public in ’27, King is heard to be making numero0us incendiary homophobic comments? Suppose he is laughing about the plight of gays and lesbians? Suppose he is continually making homophobic comments on the tapes, and that it’s clearly MLK’s voice making the comments and not someone else?

    Now THAT could very well spark public outrage. Orgies, gangbangs, numerous sex acts with hookers are one thing, but homophobic comments are totally out of line, because they speak directly to the person’s character. And homophobia isn’t who we are in 2019 (and probably wont be who we are in ’27 either).

    Just asking. And noticing.

  113. @Jack D
    Of course no attack on MLK's sacred memory by evil white racists is possible, but you are discounting an attack from the Left. To the Woke, MLK is an old fashioned figure who died before they were born. His advocacy of non-violence and a future where skin color would have no importance is NOT what Antifa and BLM subscribe to. Not all all. All those MLK Boulevards should be renamed Malcolm X Boulevard in their view.

    I have a feeling those MLK Boulevards are going to be renamed Michael Brown Boulevard, Trayvon Martin Boulevard, Eric Garner Boulevard, Freddie Gray Boulevard, and lots and lots of Emmitt Till Boulevards.

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Perhap’s even Emmit Till’s Father also.....
  114. @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    If they rename all the Martin Luther King Boulevards, how will anyone know where to go to buy hard drugs when they’re in a strange town?

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  115. OT, but Uncle Sailer’s favorite Wimmin Whine About Competition recurring theme:

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/445614-ocasio-cortez-hits-nyt-over-story-on-hope-hicks-its-framed-as-some-lifetime

    bored identity will not rest until Hope Hicks shape-shifts her hideously white-reptilian body & soul appearance into something* more Current Year palatable:

    ****************************************************************************************

    * The full story of that Hopefully Hicks is here:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7008603/Schizophrenic-woman-shoved-stranger-NYC-subway-train-dies-suicide-prison.html

    https://nypost.com/2016/11/08/woman-pushed-to-her-death-in-subway-was-a-wife-and-chef/

    https://popularcrime.com/2018/01/05/husband-of-subway-push-victim-sues-city-over-her-death/

    CBS does their thing:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-city-subway-push-suspect-melanie-liverpool-i-didnt-admit-to-nothing/

    And then, there’s this push:

    https://www.amny.com/transit/times-square-42nd-street-subway-push-leaves-woman-dead-suspect-charged-nypd-says-1.12571224

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    AOC really is an amusing idiot.

    People "dredge up" thuggish photos of shooting "victims" like Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin because it's relevant to whether they were shot in self-defense while engaging in thug-like behavior.

    For non-compliance with a subpoena it's not so much an issue. Besides, does AOC really think there are pictures of Hope Hicks flashing gang signs and posing with guns and stacks of cash. What a dope she is.
  116. • Replies: @95Theses
    Curious headline, that. Why should truth ever be a difficult thing to tell? Could it have something to do with a commitment to believing convenient and familiar untruths which have been nursed along all these decades by an agenda-driven media? Nah.
  117. @Buffalo Joe
    This won't get MSM coverage until Trump tweets a stupid comment. And then they will just #Me Too Trump again. MLK is not going anywhere.

    I agree on the premise: no MSM coverage, and MLK is not going anywhere.

    This holds because MLK’s actual legacy of racial comity has been pushed aside and forgotten due to the adoption and enforcement of racial identity politics.

    MLK: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

    In other words, MLK remains a totem, but an empty one as his message has been long ignored.

    • Replies: @Buffalo Joe
    Forbes, nice reply.
  118. @Lugash
    The Wayback Machine is your friend:

    https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://martinlutherking.org

    I loaded this one:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20100307010615/http://www.martinlutherking.org/

    At the bottom of the page it says “Hosted by Stormfront”. In his net smart book (not a great book) Howard Rheingold uses the martin luther king page hosted by stormfront as his type example of hoax material on the internet.

    It has been known to everyone who cared to look since the 1987 Bearing the Cross that King got more pussy than Frank Sinatra.

  119. @Anon
    OT

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out, because they do not engage with critics, so gaping logic holes are never plugged. For instance, when it was pointed out that they were being racist to whites (Saul Alinsky rule 4, "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules"), they came up with "racism cannot be directed at whites, because they have power." When it's pointed out that whites do not have power, on campuses, they revert to Yes they do and shut up.

    Anyway ...

    Has anyone ever framed the European colonization of the Americas explicitly as economic and political migrantion while comparing that to modern day migrants in Europe and the southern U.S. border? In other words, the Indians were racist, xenophobic NIMBYs keeping out the underprivileged?

    There would be so many hilarious parallels:

    -- Europeans brought diseases. But isn't that a racist trope used today (measles, tuberclulosis, ebola)?

    -- Europeans came in huge numbers, or had many children: But attempts today at numerical limits are criticized.

    -- Indians became a minority in their own country: Well, yes.

    It could go on and on.

    The flipside frame is to say that modern migrants are colonists, colonizing the countries they enter. This is said of course. But a more detail critique using campus academic colonialism theory would probably produce hilarious results.

    A problem with campus-origin left-wing ideology is that it tends to be internally inconsistent and not well thought out

    I think that’s the central problem. Other than it’s anti-white animus of course. But then I think the latter is the real issue, the rest is just a rag bag of half-thought ideas to try and justify it.

  120. This bit about about Dokta Kang goes back as early as the late 60s when I first heard about Hoover and his MLK dossier. It was one of several reasons why I was never terribly impressed with the guy–unlike his nemesis the former pimp, Malcolm Little a/k/a Malcolm X, who, if nothing else had major league cujones. MLK always was, and remains, a creation of a white liberal media thirsting for a Hero of Color. Like his linear descendant, Obama, he was “safe” whereas guys like MX were, uh, “edgy”. None, including Obama, constituted whatchacall a prize package but, well, we gotta have our heroes, right?

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
  121. @Lot
    There’s a Baldwin debate at Oxford Union that you will see lefties describe like the second coming of Lincoln or Cicero.

    I watched it, and he was just awful, style, content, everything. He just droned on and on.

    And yet the upper class Englishmen in the audience, born circa 1948, awarded him with massive applause.

    In other words, the Ta of his generation.

    Not quite.

    TNC is an imitation of Baldwin.

    Baldwin at least wrote one pretty good book.

    TNC gets to have the reputation of being as good as people said Baldwin was.

    People can disagree as to whether Baldwin was overrated. I don’t know enough to weigh in.

    What TNC did was say “I’m the new Baldwin” and have people who should have known better fawn over him and say “yes, you are the new Baldwin so take this money from us to spread your infinite wisdom of black bodies”.

    Even worse are the TNC wannabes who throw out “black bodies” as if it were something original they came up with.

    If you think Baldwin was overrated, what do you call writers who are weak imitations of a weak imitation of Baldwin?

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    See the reviews written by Nathan Glazer of Baldwin's work published ca. 1985, and Joseph Epstein's posthumous assessment of his oeuvre. Epstein's view is that his quality began to slide downhill ca. 1962 and that by the end of his life he was a rant-generating crank. Glazer (who'd assisted Baldwin early in his career) was much gentler but made it clear that he found later Baldwin baffling and that his talent had been wasted.

    Stop and think about it. It's not immediately clear that he was a capable and energetic autodidact. His schooling was truncated. He was never a husband or father, so he lacked crucial raw material observing and understanding the human condition. He doesn't seem to have had regular wage employment after a certain point in his young adult years, so he lacked that as well. Something Glazer pointed out was that he'd lived in France so long that he'd lost touch with the warp and woof of American life.

    Something Thomas Sowell points out: very commonly a certain sort of stance toward the larger society and a certain set of priorities are not those of intelligent people, but of articulate people.
  122. @Desiderius
    I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The wokerati are way to the left of King on race. Content of their character really sticks in their craw.

    Desi, not disputing what you are saying, but who would have thought there was “left” to the left of King on race, other than militant activists.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    There was always plenty of Left - you had Paul Robeson and WEB DuBois who were hard core pro-Soviet Communists, you had Marcus Garvey who was a Black separatist, etc. If you read the black press for the last century, they were always Leftist and espoused the same talking points as today - reparations, etc.

    The difference was this - these black "intellectuals" were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan. But today you have figures like Tawny-Hazy Coates who are taken seriously by the mainstream and their every word is fawned over by whites as well as blacks.
    , @Desiderius

    other than militant activists
     
    There aren’t many (now). The LARP is that this time they mean business so they’re all militant activists. Which conveniently allows them to ignore ethical and professional standards with impunity.
  123. @bomag
    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.


    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

     

    I've thought farming got a pass because it's too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas
     
    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let's watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.

    bomag, “Dress code”, you mean overalls and shit kicker boots. I see those on lots on diverse guys when I drive thru the inner city. Of course they are not referred to as “work clothes.”

  124. @Anonymous

    King was subject to an FBI campaign of surveillance ordered by Director J Edgar Hoover in an effort to undermine his power
     
    If these allegations were really true, wouldn't they have published them when they were trying to "undermine King's power"?

    If these allegations were really true, wouldn’t they have published them when they were trying to “undermine King’s power”?

    The FBI did publish them at the time and it was all lies. During COINTELPRO the FBI fabricated a lot of stuff about subversives and “leaked” it to friendlies.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Again, King's admiring biographer and his closest confidante (Ralph David Abernathy) confirm that sexual misconduct was common fare in King's life. As for his academic misconduct, the evidence is there in cold print (unless you fancy FBI agents copied his dissertation and then produced faux Tillich volumes with the text, down to backdated copyright notices).
  125. “It’s interesting that there apparently wasn’t much interest in this topic in the U.S. media world that Garrow, an American writer, is publishing in Britain.”

    In the same vein, Mr. Sailer, with the Alt Right’s head in the sand regarding Trump’s Kompromat?

  126. @Lot
    It is probably a statue and can’t be changed outside act of congress.

    Census date becomes public after 70 years. Other stuff 20, 50, 70 years after someone’s death.

    Eh. They pull down statues all the time.

  127. @BenKenobi
    Whiskey, are you saying that the negro is either at your feet or at your throat?

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat

    Ben, I have a bottle of JW Blue, need an ice cube though. I’m guessing Whiskey is closer to Everclear than JW Blue.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    The juice from too wet corn silage, I'd say.
  128. Hopefully this can be an impetus to remove MLK day. Worst holiday ever.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
    Growing up in a small Southern town, the local hung a sign stating they were closed to honor Robert E Lee. Continued doing so for some years. This is a place where a good percentage of country folk have Confederate flag license plates. And guess what? We all get along just fine.
  129. @Yngvar

    If these allegations were really true, wouldn’t they have published them when they were trying to “undermine King’s power”?
     
    The FBI did publish them at the time and it was all lies. During COINTELPRO the FBI fabricated a lot of stuff about subversives and "leaked" it to friendlies.

    Again, King’s admiring biographer and his closest confidante (Ralph David Abernathy) confirm that sexual misconduct was common fare in King’s life. As for his academic misconduct, the evidence is there in cold print (unless you fancy FBI agents copied his dissertation and then produced faux Tillich volumes with the text, down to backdated copyright notices).

  130. @Jack D
    Closer to home and nearer in time (like right now), Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/world/americas/cuba-rationing-sanctions.html

    Cuba has depended on having a "sugar daddy" to take care of them ever since Castro came to power. First it was the Soviets, then during the "Special Period" they nearly starved , then it was Chavez and now it is back to starvation.

    Food production is something that is highly responsive to market signals but socialists are constitutionally unable to avoid the temptation of tinkering (if you call using a sledgehammer tinkering) with markets so food production is always a "problem". And the response to a "problem" is even more "tinkering" - the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    The sad thing about this is that Cuba is a tropical paradise like South Florida - you can grow almost every plant known to man year round. Before Castro they were a major exporter of agricultural products (mainly sugar but also tobacco,livestock, rum, etc.) If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after.

    Jack, good comment but any ice shortage in Alaska will be blamed on climate change caused by whites. I thought you got that memo.

  131. @Reg Cæsar
    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we'd have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?

    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we’d have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?

    …..nailed it.

  132. @Buffalo Joe
    Desi, not disputing what you are saying, but who would have thought there was "left" to the left of King on race, other than militant activists.

    There was always plenty of Left – you had Paul Robeson and WEB DuBois who were hard core pro-Soviet Communists, you had Marcus Garvey who was a Black separatist, etc. If you read the black press for the last century, they were always Leftist and espoused the same talking points as today – reparations, etc.

    The difference was this – these black “intellectuals” were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan. But today you have figures like Tawny-Hazy Coates who are taken seriously by the mainstream and their every word is fawned over by whites as well as blacks.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    The difference was this – these black “intellectuals” were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan.

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it. His Communist affiliations damaged his standing with the larger society, but he did have standing to damage. DuBois' red haze affiliations were late career, when he was past 70.

    The black intelligentsia of the day was a collection of academics and writers with a circumscribed audience. Booker Washington and George Washington Carver were broadly prominent, but they were notable advocates of vocational education, not social confrontation of any kind.

  133. @Forbes
    I agree on the premise: no MSM coverage, and MLK is not going anywhere.

    This holds because MLK's actual legacy of racial comity has been pushed aside and forgotten due to the adoption and enforcement of racial identity politics.

    MLK: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

     

    In other words, MLK remains a totem, but an empty one as his message has been long ignored.

    Forbes, nice reply.

  134. @Jack D
    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been "re-evaluated" in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues - they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction - it's impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press - was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/06/06/ceb26236-26c3-4e08-acad-0ee3d94ba8a5/thumbnail/620x350/66352d989bc12fce0ca844809485f355/constand.jpg

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn's vote. The D's can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard - Paris is worth a Mass.

    Constand is a lesbian and admitted as much:

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/bill-cosbys-prevailing-accuser-andrea-constand-lesbian-heres-matters-185127955.html

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.
     
    What vibe is that?
  135. @ScarletNumber
    Generally speaking, black people get a pass on #MeToo, so I think he will be safe.

    Dunno. Colby’s in jail and Weinstein seems to be able to walk away free.

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    If you mean Cosby, he was ostracized from the black community in May 2004 for his remarks at an NAACP awards ceremony

    But these people, the ones up here in the balcony fought so hard. Looking at the incarcerated, these are not political criminals. These are people going around stealing Coca-Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! And then we all run out and are outraged, 'The cops shouldn't have shot him.' What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand? I wanted a piece of pound cake just as bad as anybody else, and I looked at it and I had no money. And something called parenting said, 'If you get caught with it you're going to embarrass your mother.' Not 'You're going to get your butt kicked.' No. 'You're going to embarrass your family.'
     

    We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don't know a damned thing about Africa. With names like Shaniqua, Shaligua, Mohammed and all that crap and all of them are in jail.
     
    Therefore, they didn't care if Cosby went to jail.
  136. @Anonymous
    King's behavior was well documented at the time-in small right wing publications affiliated with "known racist groups" or with the John Birch Society, which was not racist and kicked its most acdemically distinguished founder, Revilo P Oliver, out for being racist (he really was) but had a very serious case of cooties.

    Oliver suspected that the JBS actually was financed by Rockefellers and other established globalist forces. This seemed to make no sense until the principle of cooties is understood. Works just like "radiation pressure" in a thermonuclear warhead. They couldn't keep the activities of the CFR, Bilderbergers, et all secret so they themselves told all-but associated it with cooties so it would be rejected, even though true.


    That grown adults run in terror from cooties seems unbelievable, but evidence seems to prove it.

    Shame Americans didn’t choose Oliver over Buckley back when the country still had a chance.

  137. @MEH 0910
    https://twitter.com/StandpointMag/status/1132585330090106880

    Curious headline, that. Why should truth ever be a difficult thing to tell? Could it have something to do with a commitment to believing convenient and familiar untruths which have been nursed along all these decades by an agenda-driven media? Nah.

  138. I would’ve loved this story 5 years ago. I now think the FBI is a joke with zero credibility. In fact, I would specifically question something if I found out the source was the FBI.

  139. @Paleo Liberal
    Not quite.

    TNC is an imitation of Baldwin.

    Baldwin at least wrote one pretty good book.

    TNC gets to have the reputation of being as good as people said Baldwin was.

    People can disagree as to whether Baldwin was overrated. I don’t know enough to weigh in.

    What TNC did was say “I’m the new Baldwin” and have people who should have known better fawn over him and say “yes, you are the new Baldwin so take this money from us to spread your infinite wisdom of black bodies”.

    Even worse are the TNC wannabes who throw out “black bodies” as if it were something original they came up with.

    If you think Baldwin was overrated, what do you call writers who are weak imitations of a weak imitation of Baldwin?

    See the reviews written by Nathan Glazer of Baldwin’s work published ca. 1985, and Joseph Epstein’s posthumous assessment of his oeuvre. Epstein’s view is that his quality began to slide downhill ca. 1962 and that by the end of his life he was a rant-generating crank. Glazer (who’d assisted Baldwin early in his career) was much gentler but made it clear that he found later Baldwin baffling and that his talent had been wasted.

    Stop and think about it. It’s not immediately clear that he was a capable and energetic autodidact. His schooling was truncated. He was never a husband or father, so he lacked crucial raw material observing and understanding the human condition. He doesn’t seem to have had regular wage employment after a certain point in his young adult years, so he lacked that as well. Something Glazer pointed out was that he’d lived in France so long that he’d lost touch with the warp and woof of American life.

    Something Thomas Sowell points out: very commonly a certain sort of stance toward the larger society and a certain set of priorities are not those of intelligent people, but of articulate people.

  140. @Jack D
    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been "re-evaluated" in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues - they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction - it's impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press - was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/06/06/ceb26236-26c3-4e08-acad-0ee3d94ba8a5/thumbnail/620x350/66352d989bc12fce0ca844809485f355/constand.jpg

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn's vote. The D's can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard - Paris is worth a Mass.

    Yes, Andrea Constand is a lesbian. She looks like one of those “trans racialists” too–trying to be black. And she most likely lied about Cosby.

    https://www.wfmz.com/news/southeastern-pa/witness-testifies-constand-lied-about-sexual-assault-with-cosby-for-money/731410093

    https://www.theblot.com/breaking-andrea-constand-bill-cosby-accuser-liar-rooting-bill-cosby-7762800

    • Replies: @Known Fact
    Costand resembles peak-hair Ron Duguay

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-professional-athlete-that-you-despise
  141. More along the lines of Jim Beam Rye.

    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other, keeping it real vs picket fence, that one must dominate and rule the other. Either it’s Nipsey Hustle all the way down or Ike. No middle ground. Whites particularly women want Nipsey.

    Ikr was too boring.

    I think MLK will be rehabbed. Into an exciting pump like figure for Blacks to emulate and White women to find exciting in an aspiring rapper way.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other,

    Blacks have long had more disorganized domestic lives than the rest of the population, and have a lower propensity to save money. Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965. You have a critical mass of lumpenproletarian hoods who make most black neighborhoods a trial to live in, but the people experiencing the trial are ordinary wage-earners. The lifeways of a comfortable majority aren't antagonistic. The problem is in the tail of the bell curve.
  142. @Jack D
    There was always plenty of Left - you had Paul Robeson and WEB DuBois who were hard core pro-Soviet Communists, you had Marcus Garvey who was a Black separatist, etc. If you read the black press for the last century, they were always Leftist and espoused the same talking points as today - reparations, etc.

    The difference was this - these black "intellectuals" were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan. But today you have figures like Tawny-Hazy Coates who are taken seriously by the mainstream and their every word is fawned over by whites as well as blacks.

    The difference was this – these black “intellectuals” were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan.

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it. His Communist affiliations damaged his standing with the larger society, but he did have standing to damage. DuBois’ red haze affiliations were late career, when he was past 70.

    The black intelligentsia of the day was a collection of academics and writers with a circumscribed audience. Booker Washington and George Washington Carver were broadly prominent, but they were notable advocates of vocational education, not social confrontation of any kind.

    • Agree: Desiderius
    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
    While it is fashionable among some of the alt-right to denigrate George Washington Carver, his achievements were quite remarkable. He achieved greatness in both agricultural science and science education. My training is in chemistry, and his work in agricultural chemistry is considered to be the finest of his era.

    I agree that Carver was wise enough to stay in areas for which he had expertise. He was able to accomplish quite a bit by recognizing the reality of his time and doing what he could to improve the lot of the more intelligent blacks within the limits of society.

    That being said, Carver expanded what these limits were.

    I’ve read enough about his early history to understand why he thought this way. His mother was purchased by Moses Carver, who was against slavery but needed a servant. George, his mother, and his brother were all kidnapped by folks who did not appreciate Moses’ pro-Union stance. Moses Carver only found baby George, and traded his best horse for the young boy. Moses raised him as a son.

    George Carver’s education was facilitated by a Nice White Lady who took in George at a boarding school.

    At one point there were two George Carvers living in the same town; one white and one black. Black George Carver added the middle name Washington to avoid the difficulties that ensued. It would not be seemly for the White George to make the concession, especially since Black George was the newcomer.

    To be blunt, Carver learned from an early age that he could succeed in life with the aid of Nice White People, and that antagonizing the meaner white folks could have horrible consequences. Confrontation could’ve alienated his allies and raised the ire of potential enemies.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it.
     
    Up until the 1970s or so, lefty performers were still quite competent at their craft. The Seegers, Joan Baez, Barbara Streisand, Harry Belafonte, etc.

    I guess this is hard for younger people to imagine these days.
  143. @Lugash
    The Wayback Machine is your friend:

    https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://martinlutherking.org

    from that archive:

    Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-65.
    (book reviews) Jon Meacham

    01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62

    January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King’s crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, “Stride Toward Freedom,” asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex–including King’s cries of “I’m f–ing for God” and “I’m not a Negro tonight!”

    Note: What is not mentioned in this article is that Martin Luther King was having sex with three White women, one of whom he brutally beat while screaming the above mentioned quotes. Much of the public information on King’s use of church money to hire prostitutes and his beating them came from King’s close personal friend, Rev. Ralph Abernathy (pictured above), in his 1989 book, “And the walls came tumbling down.”

    Sources:

    Newsweek Magazine 1-19-1998, page 62

    “And the walls came tumbling down,” by Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)

  144. @bomag
    I imagine the info is out there in print somewhere. KGB archives, if nothing else.

    I've always figured he was the face and voice of a movement. His chaotic personal life doesn't promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.

    The Left covers for their icons much better than the Right. I was always puzzled by Robert Byrd's ability to be taken seriously.

    His chaotic personal life doesn’t promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.

    He didn’t have a “chaotic personal life”, he was just a horndog. This is quite common among high-T alphas, starting with silverback gorillas in 1 Million BC, continuing onto Oriental potentates, JFK, Johnny Edwards and S. African black politicians in the present day. Such people, even if they are men of the cloth themselves, are completely impervious to Christian teaching concerning monogamy. They are responding to a higher power – the biological imperative that that most fit males fertilize every female in sight in order to strengthen the fitness of the species. Christian teaching, with its principles of monogamy and fidelity, is great for betas because it means that (nearly) every beta will have a female available to him but it is no great bargain for alphas who would much prefer to sow their seed widely, which is the “natural” order of things.

    • LOL: Malcolm X-Lax
  145. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Z Blog
    This is a great example of left-wing conditioning. You have been convinced that people in the past were dumb and naive, so it is OK to ignore them.

    It is how the Left detaches people from their history and from observable reality.

    So are we supposed to reflexively believe the “intelligence community” now, or do we just selectively trust them when it suits our purposes?

    • Replies: @The Z Blog
    Another good example of the Progressive conditioning. You're grasping at any straw to defend King, because you have been conditioned to believe anti-racism is the highest virtue.

    It's why conservatism has been such a complete bust.
  146. Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-65.
    (book reviews) Jon Meacham

    01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62

    January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King’s crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, “Stride Toward Freedom,” asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex–including King’s cries of “I’m f–ing for God” and “I’m not a Negro tonight!”

    Note: What is not mentioned in this article is that Martin Luther King was having sex with three White women, one of whom he brutally beat while screaming the above mentioned quotes. Much of the public information on King’s use of church money to hire prostitutes and his beating them came from King’s close personal friend, Rev. Ralph Abernathy (pictured above), in his 1989 book, “And the walls came tumbling down.”

    Sources:

    Newsweek Magazine 1-19-1998, page 62

    “And the walls came tumbling down,” by Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)

    this was from the wayback machine

  147. @Anonymous
    This will have minimal effect on American national politics.

    It can have some effect in Conservative Evangelical Churches that have pushed to make MLK Jr a God/Saint and denounced their own church founders as beyond the pale racists, anti Semites.

    Lutherans have renounced Martin Luther
    Mormons have renounced Joseph Smith and Brigham Young and the racial exclusions of Blacks from the Priesthood before the 1970s.
    Catholics have denounced all the anti Talmud, anti Semitic comments/polices of every Catholic Pope before ~ 1963.
    The Southern Baptist Church leadership has renounced the White South before MLK Jr. supposedly redeemed the South/USA.

    That's life.

    “the anti Talmud, “
    considering what the Talmud says about the Virgin Mary and Jesus, every Catholic (and Christian) should denounce it.

    I believe a lot of the anti-christianity we see from secular jews is internalized, unconsciously talmudic.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary - it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam's Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK's chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.
  148. @Art Deco
    The difference was this – these black “intellectuals” were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan.

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it. His Communist affiliations damaged his standing with the larger society, but he did have standing to damage. DuBois' red haze affiliations were late career, when he was past 70.

    The black intelligentsia of the day was a collection of academics and writers with a circumscribed audience. Booker Washington and George Washington Carver were broadly prominent, but they were notable advocates of vocational education, not social confrontation of any kind.

    While it is fashionable among some of the alt-right to denigrate George Washington Carver, his achievements were quite remarkable. He achieved greatness in both agricultural science and science education. My training is in chemistry, and his work in agricultural chemistry is considered to be the finest of his era.

    I agree that Carver was wise enough to stay in areas for which he had expertise. He was able to accomplish quite a bit by recognizing the reality of his time and doing what he could to improve the lot of the more intelligent blacks within the limits of society.

    That being said, Carver expanded what these limits were.

    I’ve read enough about his early history to understand why he thought this way. His mother was purchased by Moses Carver, who was against slavery but needed a servant. George, his mother, and his brother were all kidnapped by folks who did not appreciate Moses’ pro-Union stance. Moses Carver only found baby George, and traded his best horse for the young boy. Moses raised him as a son.

    George Carver’s education was facilitated by a Nice White Lady who took in George at a boarding school.

    At one point there were two George Carvers living in the same town; one white and one black. Black George Carver added the middle name Washington to avoid the difficulties that ensued. It would not be seemly for the White George to make the concession, especially since Black George was the newcomer.

    To be blunt, Carver learned from an early age that he could succeed in life with the aid of Nice White People, and that antagonizing the meaner white folks could have horrible consequences. Confrontation could’ve alienated his allies and raised the ire of potential enemies.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    George Washington Carver was some sort of mentor to the teenage Henry Wallace, the future geneticist and Vice President during WWII.

    Wallace was a very talented man.

  149. @black sea
    I have a feeling those MLK Boulevards are going to be renamed Michael Brown Boulevard, Trayvon Martin Boulevard, Eric Garner Boulevard, Freddie Gray Boulevard, and lots and lots of Emmitt Till Boulevards.

    Perhap’s even Emmit Till’s Father also…..

  150. @AceDeuce
    I'm not sure that happened at the funeral, per se. Three months after the assassination, King was in a wiretapped hotel room in Los Angeles, and recorded footage of the funeral was on the TV.

    Here's a 2001 book that references the incident . Garrow and Taylor Branch have both written about it in other books.


    https://books.google.com/books?id=_peZip6-DUgC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=martin+luther+king+%22Hyatt+House%22+1964+Kennedy&source=bl&ots=Y5qEVE8heK&sig=ACfU3U20oGMbTswgce2ujAIaiMqUyOaIMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifpcOH3rviAhWrrVkKHfYWDkYQ6AEwDnoECAcQAQ

    Scroll down for an account of the incident.

    Yeah, I’m aware. If I recall correctly, Christopher Hitchens who talked to Taylor Branch about it, said the joke was along the lines of, “There she goes, down on her knees to suck him off one last time.” Charming, in any case. Ironically, Caroline has been one of the fiercest guardians of MLK’s reputation. I recall reading that Jackie loathed MLK to the day she died but that Caroline has been quite public in assuring everyone that Jackie held MLK in the highest regard. LOL. Yeah, sure, Caroline. She just kept it to herself for 40 years. Jackie couldn’t even stand to look at pictures of MLK.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Jacqueline_Kennedy/jacqueline-kennedys-feelings-martin-luther-king-jr-revealed/story?id=14478321

  151. @Art Deco
    King was a far more Gantryish figure than anyone imagined in 1962. I've found that white leftoids react to references to this with the sort of emotional neuralgia Daniel Patrick Moynihan displayed in 1983 when he threw down a copy of a confidential report and shouted 'filth' on the floor of the Senate. Of course, it's the conduct, not the text on the conduct, that's filthy.

    It's been known since that time that the FBI had recordings of adulterous trysts in it's archives, it's been known since 1988 that when King and his entourage traveled to Norway in 1964 to receive his Nobel prize, that they hired prostitutes and whole crew made enough of a ruckus to attract the attention of the police; Bayard Rustin (uninvolved with the hookers) happened to return to the hotel during the fracas and had to talk police officers out of arresting everyone. It's been known since 1989 (courtesy Ralph David Abernathy) that King spent his last night on Earth in the company of three different women not his wife.

    It's also been known since 1990 that 1/3 of the text of his doctoral dissertation was plagiarized from the work of Paul Tillich and the work of another fellow named John Boozer (something which tells you that academic theologians familiar with Tillich's work hadn't undertaken more than a cursory reading of that dissertation in the 35 years which elapsed between when he emerged as a public figure and when the plagiarism was discovered; btw, in that era, abstracts of dissertations were commonly found in readily available reference series and you could get microtext copies of a dissertation on request generated by a company called UMI; you could get them in a matter of days and, if you were a registered student or a faculty member, your institutional library would handle the paperwork for you; if you were researching his theology, you didn't have to go to Boston and read the original typescript).


    The sexual dirt wasn't known outside of people with access to the FBI data and people in King's entourage. Richard John Neuhaus, who knew King well enough to know odd details about him not publicly acknowledged (e.g. that he smoked cigarettes) knew nothing about any of this and thought it was all calumny and innuendo until Ralph David Abernathy spilled the beans. (By contrast, Bayard Rustin's homosexuality was known to anyone who'd ever been in the same room with him). Reflecting on it, Neuhaus later said it was less surprising than it seemed at first if you recalled that in the Christian kultursmog of the era, it was common to hear people express disdain for "morality from the waist down".


    King's status in public discourse and official history of the sort you see on PBS has survived all of this. It's hard to imagine that there's anything in the files which will have much effect unless it involves dead girls or live boys.

    JFK was involved in killing a couple of French hookers during a “girling” trip while on a yacht on the French Riviera. Limited details are in the book “JFK and his Women”.
    It’s practically never mentioned anywhere else, and murder trumps beatings and rape.
    The rules are different for some….

  152. @Jack D
    Closer to home and nearer in time (like right now), Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/world/americas/cuba-rationing-sanctions.html

    Cuba has depended on having a "sugar daddy" to take care of them ever since Castro came to power. First it was the Soviets, then during the "Special Period" they nearly starved , then it was Chavez and now it is back to starvation.

    Food production is something that is highly responsive to market signals but socialists are constitutionally unable to avoid the temptation of tinkering (if you call using a sledgehammer tinkering) with markets so food production is always a "problem". And the response to a "problem" is even more "tinkering" - the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    The sad thing about this is that Cuba is a tropical paradise like South Florida - you can grow almost every plant known to man year round. Before Castro they were a major exporter of agricultural products (mainly sugar but also tobacco,livestock, rum, etc.) If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after.

    If Communism came to Alaska there would be an ice shortage soon after

    Yes, but…

    You don’t need ice if you don’t have any groceries…

    USSR: Grocery store uncut

    Checkmate…capitalists

  153. @bomag
    I’m sure you can guess the details

    LOL

    A fill-in-the-blank essay triggered the usual.


    In it [the essay], he said the FFA is not respectful enough of Latinos, not aggressive enough in promoting women of color to leadership positions, has a dress code that marginalizes people who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms and in general reflects a leadership that’s predominantly white, heterosexual and Christian.

    Leaders of the organization say they are listening to Roiger, who was recently one of its student leaders.

    “It drove home that the work that we’re doing at National FFA to elevate inclusion, diversity and equity in the organization is important,” said Mark Poeschl, CEO of National FFA, based in Indianapolis. “We want to make FFA a welcoming place for all students.”

     

    I've thought farming got a pass because it's too important to grow enough food for all the Democrat voters to come.

    If we have a more diverse pipeline, then we can have more innovative and creative ideas
     
    Most everything of note in Ag has been done by a White guy or a fancy Asian. Let's watch and see if our rising political overlords can wreck the place in service to their notion of purity. The efforts of Stalin and Mao are not encouraging, but maybe the current crop has actually learned something from the past.

    Future farmers “who don’t subscribe to conventional gender norms?” I think we have a potential Green Acres reboot on our hands here

  154. @Anonymous
    So are we supposed to reflexively believe the "intelligence community" now, or do we just selectively trust them when it suits our purposes?

    Another good example of the Progressive conditioning. You’re grasping at any straw to defend King, because you have been conditioned to believe anti-racism is the highest virtue.

    It’s why conservatism has been such a complete bust.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    [quote]You’re grasping at any straw to defend King, because you have been conditioned to believe anti-racism is the highest virtue.[/quote]

    Even though I freely admitted above that his philandering was well documented?

    Unless I'm misunderstanding something, the author read an FBI agent's summary of a transcript of a recording. How exactly did he know he was hearing a rape? What does a rape sound like? "Help, help, stop raping me"? Pretty remarkable that he could discern that over MLK's laughter. Wireless microphones in the mid-1960s were much higher quality than I would have guessed.

    Judging by your blog, you don't seem to trust the FBI's reports of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, but you do trust them here. As is usually the case on this blog, skepticism is a selective thing: give white men the maximum benefit of the doubt, believe anything negative about anybody with dark skin.

  155. Not sure how Cannes missed this one. Wendy Williams was bloviating on her show that this movie was a prime example of cultural appropriation; while sporting a long, flowing, blonde headpiece/wig.

  156. @Reg Cæsar
    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we'd have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?

    Was the 50-year seal essentially a bet that by 2027 we’d have degenerated to such moral obtuseness that nobody would care anymore?

    To protect informants.

    There is no way they could have this information without someone very close to King.

    My guess is that there are no great big new revelations about King himself, but that the big deal will be knowing who was the snitch. Or who were the snitches.

    Jesse Jackson perhaps?

  157. @Bruce County
    Jim Jim Jim...The black mind dont think that way. They even hate themselves!! They like the liberals because they are the engine that drives the machine for the Free Shit Army.
    They wont bite the hand that feeds them.

    It’s true that most of them want as much free shit as they can get, but are you kidding me about biting the hand that feeds them? That’s their favorite past time. I maintain that most blacks don’t like liberals–they can hate them and like the free shit at the same time.

    I sense respect from many blacks when I make it clear that I’m not a Klansman but I’m not going to kiss their asses, either. It’s pretty basic animal kingdom shit, isn’t it? If you put off the scent that you can and will defend yourself, you’re less likely to be victimized by predators.

  158. @Anonymous
    It sounds a bit too salacious, like something out of a Hollywood movie or Rolling Stone "Rape on Campus!" article. The "sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman" part I mean; the affairs I think are a matter of historical record at this point.

    The FBI has a tendency to exaggerate (or outright fabricate) evidence against those it dislikes; human nature combined with the thuggish authoritarian tendencies inherent to people attracted to that line of work. It's important to remember that King was not regarded as a saint like he is today; he was a troublemaker who was politically radical and angered a large number of important people. We've seen what the FBI does (or tries to do) to loud-mouthed subversives.

    It sounds a bit too salacious…sitting there laughing while his friend rapes a woman

    Blacks…salacious…rape? Unpossible.

    Category:Murdered rappers – Wikipedia

  159. @JimDandy
    Yes, Andrea Constand is a lesbian. She looks like one of those "trans racialists" too--trying to be black. And she most likely lied about Cosby.

    https://www.wfmz.com/news/southeastern-pa/witness-testifies-constand-lied-about-sexual-assault-with-cosby-for-money/731410093

    https://www.theblot.com/breaking-andrea-constand-bill-cosby-accuser-liar-rooting-bill-cosby-7762800
  160. @Janusm
    ive always wondered, who can declassify tapes ahead of 2027? another fed judge? Trump? why dont they?

    Trump is invested in the Boomer worship of all things black. Republicans will probably be out the gate denouncing this as a Dem smear.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Boomers don't worship blacks (unless they're famous athletes). They're scared of blacks.

    All this "Dems are the Real Racists" stuff is groveling before the bully and telling him to beat up someone else today.

    Republicans and media conservatives (like FOX) kiss ass to black Republicans as a form of protection money. If someone accuses you of racism, you can wave around your special black friend as a protective talisman.
  161. @Faraday's Bobcat
    That's a good example of what I call Everything Is About Everything. It's like the Berkeley City Council feeling the need to have a foreign policy. Now, FFA could stand for Future Farmers of America, or it could stand for Flaming Fruitcakes of Alabama, or Fiscally Frugal Aztecs.

    It all started in 2004 when the congressional General Accounting Office changed to the Government Accountability Office. Accounting is just too narrow a scope for ambitious bureaucrats. Why limit yourself to boring double-entry bookkeeping and fiduciary whatsis, when you can take on Government Accountability? The sky's the limit!

    The saddest example of this I can think of is when Northwestern’s legendary School of Speech succumbed and became the “School of Communication”.

    As if five syllables communicate more than one. But that one had 81 years of history behind it.

  162. what will be REALLY interesting is if one of the women who was raped or harassed came forward.. that would might provide an intersectional melt down..

  163. @Art Deco
    The difference was this – these black “intellectuals” were considered to be a joke by whites. Their views were considered to be radical and/or crackpot by most whites (except for Communists), completely lacking in legitimacy. Comparable to the way (most) white people still think of say Louis Farrakhan.

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it. His Communist affiliations damaged his standing with the larger society, but he did have standing to damage. DuBois' red haze affiliations were late career, when he was past 70.

    The black intelligentsia of the day was a collection of academics and writers with a circumscribed audience. Booker Washington and George Washington Carver were broadly prominent, but they were notable advocates of vocational education, not social confrontation of any kind.

    Robeson was a capable entertainer who made a good living at it.

    Up until the 1970s or so, lefty performers were still quite competent at their craft. The Seegers, Joan Baez, Barbara Streisand, Harry Belafonte, etc.

    I guess this is hard for younger people to imagine these days.

  164. And then they– Al Stewart’s neighbors– came for Neil Young:

    Neil Young gets cut off during headlining set at BottleRock 2019

    Neil Old, still breaking curfew at 73!

  165. anonymous[109] • Disclaimer says:

    Ask an Anti White: Why is ”Diversity” is entirely one way? Why does it only mean taking white institutions and populations across the globe and turning them non white?

    Whats the real end game here? If this were imposed on All and Only black peoples, wouldn’t it be obviously Anti Black?

    Do the ‘anti racists’ care about the ongoing torture, rape and murder of minority Whites in South Africa?

    Slavery, colonialism, etc. were common to all peoples. See Turkey, North Africa, Mongolia, Japan, among others. African and Native tribes routinely captured, enslaved and sold each other.

    Whites like the Slavs and Irish for example have their own history mass slavery, being captured and sold to the Islamic world in particular.

    The Religion of PC is just organized Anti Whiteism.

  166. @Jack D
    There are a number of figures (living and dead) about whom the basic facts have been known for decades or centuries and yet they have been "re-evaluated" in light of Current Year thinking. It all has to do with their position on the Intersectional Totem Pole vis-a-vis other groups. Unlike your Adversity Score, which is presumably fixed for life, your rankings on the Intersectional Totem Pole (and just as importantly, those who are in a position to make power plays against you) may go up and down with the political winds. Historical and established figures have a certain amount of inertia attached to them, just like physical statues - they are not going to fall by themselves. However, once your enemies have gained strength and risen even higher on the pole they may decide that they now have the institutional strength to take a run at you and knock you from your perch because, now jumping from a greater height, they can land with more force. (Of course gravity only works in the downward direction - it's impossible to jump on someone who belongs to a group who is HIGHER than you on the pole). Often such contests server to DETERMINE position on the pole. Since Intersectional Pokemon points are, like rankings in some sports, determined dynamically by virtue of the results of past matches, a group that is feeling its oats may decide to take a test run to find out where they really stand today.

    This explains why, for example, statues of Robert E. Lee sat undisturbed for decades throughout the height of the Civil Rights movement and its subsequent victories but were toppled in recent years.

    Or for example, a Jew may attempt to play the Holocaust card and be told by blacks that the point value of that card has now been reduced to zero and that they are just honkies now:

    https://nypost.com/2019/05/25/teachers-allegedly-told-to-treat-black-students-as-victims-punish-whites/

    Think of Bill Cosby, who for decades was almost as beloved as MLK, and yet white women were able to dethrone him. (Did MLK prefer white women or black or would he take whatever he could get?) BTW, Andrea Constand, the woman whose complaint finally put him in jail gives off a distinct lesbian vibe but this was never mentioned in the press - was this part of the unspoken subtext?

    https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/06/06/ceb26236-26c3-4e08-acad-0ee3d94ba8a5/thumbnail/620x350/66352d989bc12fce0ca844809485f355/constand.jpg

    So, given all that, a play on Martin Luther King may be possible someday if the Intersectional Pokemon points line up correctly. As we go into the 2020 campaign and especially if the D nominee is female, expect that anti-male rhetoric is going to be dialed up to 11 in order to get out the womyn's vote. The D's can take blacks for granted but white women are still in play so if they have to throw MLK overboard, then so be it. Obama threw his own grandma who raised him overboard - Paris is worth a Mass.

    There were other reasons why the statues of Robert E Lee went up and stayed up in the post Civil War era, until recent times.

    The South has had a strong military tradition since colonial times. The Lee Family was a big part of that tradition.

    In the 100 years following Reconstruction, the US was involved in Indian wars, the Spanish American War, two World Wars, adventures in various third world nations, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

    It is not clear that a divided nation would have done as well in those wars. The US couldn’t say “F U crackers “ and expected to put together a viable army.

    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    Well the Democrat Party certainly needs (and gets) black votes today a lot more than it needs white votes in the South so R.E. Lee (or at least his statue) is nowadays in danger in any Democrat ruled part of the South. For the most part, this means big cities, cities with universities, and the states that border on Washington, D.C. I don't think that most whites in the South have really changed their views on REL but whites are not really in charge anymore in some places. The views haven't changed but the voter demographics have.
    , @Art Deco
    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.

    There was a general mobilization during the period running from 1917 to 1920 and from 1940 to 1946. We had a roughly similar situation during the period running from 1950 to 1954. You had throughout the 19th c what amounted to counter-insurgency operations against the Indians and you had from 1898 and 1935 a number of military engagements abroad, but these were all conducted with a volunteer military encompassing modest shares of the country's domestic product (< 2%).
  167. Among documents relating mainly to the Kennedy assassination that were released in 2018 was a FBI report entitled “Martin Luther King, Jr., A Current Analysis.” This included much about King’s womanizing and his association with members of the Communist Party of the USA, in particular Stanley Levison. It may be found at the following link:

    https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf

    Curiously, at the time, none other than David Garrow was cited in the Washington Post as responding to this document as follows:

    David Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and historian who had written extensively about King, said much of the explosive allegations in the document are neither new nor true.

    “The number one thing I’ve learned in 40 years of doing this, is just because you see it in a top-secret document, just because someone had said it to the FBI, doesn’t mean it’s all accurate,” Garrow told The Washington Post, citing the infamous dossier that contains salacious allegations against President Trump.

    Now Garrow appears to have done a volte-face about the behavior attributed to King in the 1968 report. This is one of the more curious aspects about all of this. Enough of the unflattering information about King has been confirmed by other sources, not least of them his own associates (e.g., Ralph Abernathy). Most of the “mainstream” media simply ignored this. Is Garrow now reversing his earlier dismissal of the FBI’s “Current Analysis” document just because he has found new and more persuasive evidence, or does he have some other motive? I’d guess the latter.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    What's interesting about all this is the "What else is new?" aspect. King's womanizing--like JFK's--was known for years. As in the case of JFK, when the media picks out someone as their secular Jesus who will somehow save us from ourselves and the word gets out that he (or she i.e. Hillary) are just as screwed-up as the rest of us pilgrims, they play make-believe. King will remain a hero to such as the readership of Slate and the Gray Hag, most of whom dwell in a make-believe environment.
  168. Good grief,

    I am a moderate fan of Dr. King, his failing was not the relations out of marriage — that is disappointing. But his real error was in doing what blacks have done since there were blacks, he embraced all issues as though they at of blacks. It ws in my view a tragic mistake. By ding so he allowed the interests of blacks to be blindsided y a host of unrelated and totally destructive advances. And as typical of whites, they took that ball and proceeded to undermine whatever gains had been won.

    His second mistake was to allow himself to be hoodwinked in the name of intellectual moralism, to take on Vietnam — he was not only wrong on the question, he again muddied the waters for blacks.
    ______________________________

    However,

    snore and snore. I would have thought by now everyone knew about this matter. It’s almost laughable. Actually it is laughable. As it turns out Dr./Rev. King a man of enormous clout and accessibility had relations outside of wedlock while married —

    Say it ain’t so — with white women no less. Shocking — just well, not shocking at all. Disappointing perhaps, but a shock — no. Consensual relations should cease being part of the meetoo whine as should flirting, courting, and a host of mundane normal male female communication exchanges.

    What is a problem is that by the time those tapes were made, it was quite clear that Dr. Rev. King was not a communist. even today, some republicans try to claim him as one of their own. No. Dir. hoover and the FBI were concerned about the issues of white ownership and control. Hence the eager attempts to encourage Dr. Rev king to take his own life.

    That is the real reveal here. That the FBI was a wayward child in counter intelligence and have been a destructive force to thousands when it came to violating both ethics and the law in doing so.

    There’s a very soft and dark underbelly of US law enforcement for those who care to look. And it is very dark.

  169. Might be a good idea to steer clear of Paul Robeson, a man ahead of time, and even ahead of that.

    Entertainer — doesn’t skim the surface.

  170. Bugg says:
    @Bruce County
    I luagh when people bring that little tidbit of history up. The Playboy interview. I for one have read it many times times. He's a stark raving fucking lunatic. Like this part.
    Playboy: Along with the other civil rights leaders, you have often proposed a massive program of economic aid, financed by the Federal Government, to improve the lot of the nation's 20,000,000 Negroes. Just one of the projects you've mentioned, however—the HARYOU-ACT program to provide jobs for Negro youths—is expected to cost $141,000,000 over the next ten years, and that includes only Harlem. A nationwide program such as you propose would undoubtedly run into the billions.

    King: About 50 billion, actually—which is less than one year of our present defense spending. It is my belief that with the expenditure of this amount, over a ten-year period, a genuine and dramatic transformation could be achieved in the conditions of Negro life in America. I am positive, moreover, that the money spent would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils.

    Playboy: If Negroes are also granted preferential treatment in housing, as you propose, how would you allay the alarm with which many white homeowners, fearing property devaluation, greet the arrival of Negroes in hitherto all white neighborhoods?

    King: We must expunge from our society the myths and half-truths that engender such groundless fears as these. In the first place, there is no truth to the myth that Negroes depreciate property.
    There are more juicy bits one can laugh at..Heres the link if anyone needs to expel their coffee onto the monitor..
    https://playboysfw.kinja.com/martin-luther-king-jr-a-candid-conversation-with-the-n-1502354861

    When some neocon or GOP establishment idiot tells you how “MLK would have been one of us today”, this is the kind of thing they intentionally ignore. MLK would have been out front looking for more money, more programs, more AA. The colorblind society, judging people by the content of their character, yeah, we’ll get to that later.

    Would hope in the rash to rename everything associated with our forefathers, this gives the Pete Butplugs of the world pause. Every person has his faults, none of us is prefect. Sadly that isn’t very likely.

  171. Whether real or manufactured (easier to do these days) relational behavior remains a “go to ticket” for undermining the lives of people, even innocent people.

    And it’s generally an easy sell.

  172. @bob sykes
    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    Not beyond the incompetence of the CIA to have made a martyr out of someone who would have been discredited sooner rather than later by assassinating him.

  173. By now, I think conservatives have more invested in the heavily sanitized image of MLK Jr. I’m sure the left would be ok with finding someone more radical and anti-white to replace MLK Jr.

  174. @216
    Replacing MLK Jr with James Baldwin in the Prog Pantheon is the likely outcome.

    Baldwin was odiously anti-white, and gay. No color-blind speeches to throw off the message of resentment.

    Angela Davis would also be a good candidate.

  175. @JimDandy
    There is a third way. I've always said (even though I have no way of actually knowing) that if I was black I would fucking hate white liberals, because they are the worst kinds of racists--condescending and superior and objectifying AND fawning. I try to hold black people to the same standard as whites--and I'm literally not capable of engaging in the type of grotesque negro-head-patting white Progressives revel in. I get along with pretty well with black people I know better than casually.

    DR3 has never and will never work.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    https://www.thegreenhead.com/imgs/xl/looming-strawman-scary-lifesize-animatronic-lunging-scarecrow-xl.jpg
     
    No onr has the balls to use DR4.

    The fourth R being "right". Or "realistic".
    , @JimDandy
    Tis what it is--white liberals are patronizing racists.
  176. @ACommenter
    "the anti Talmud, "
    considering what the Talmud says about the Virgin Mary and Jesus, every Catholic (and Christian) should denounce it.

    I believe a lot of the anti-christianity we see from secular jews is internalized, unconsciously talmudic.

    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary – it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin’ around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam’s Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK’s chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.

    • Replies: @ACommenter
    in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers
    You forgot to mention taking credit for the execution of Jesus and the claim that he is burning in eternity in hell..

    and you also for got to mention that It was seen as a heretical sect by mainstream talmudic Judaism and heavily persecute (Paul of course was the son of a Rabbi and actively persecuting Christian) that is perfect 'reasonable' for mainstream Judaism, just as the mainstream (RC) Christian church would persercute protestants a millennium later.

    You also forgot to mention it was so filled with anti-christian vile that it was one of the reasons for Isabel expelling Jews from castille.

    So I think your comment underplays the hostility of Judaism towards Christianity.. of course, any orthodox priest who gets spit on every week by jews knows they have an enormous amount of hatred towards Christianity.

    , @Jonathan Mason

    To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam’s Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier.
     
    Yeah, but it was pretty much SOP in the ancient world for political and religious leaders to be of virgin birth, including Krishna, Buddha, Plato, Dionysus, Hercules, and Osirisis. Virgin birth and resurrection from the dead were also much more common than today, though I would not be surprised if Donald Trump were to claim virgin birth if he thought it would win him a few votes. (Resurrection from the dead would be harder to pull off.)

    There were also irregularities in the birth of Moses who was allegedly found floating in the Nile, by an Egyptian princess doing her dirty laundry and raised as an Egyptian. Now how exactly did this story about him really being a Hebrew who had survived one of the periodic massacres of the innocents that were such a feature of life in Biblical times get out when he was an adult and running in the Hebrew leadership primaries with his Hebrexit policy?

    I actually remember reading that someone who knew the writer Aldous Huxley once said something like "he seemed like an angel in our midst, and it was hard to believe that he was human born," so it seems that there is a natural human tendency to perceive great men as supernatural, especially if you yourself are uneducated.

    “Happiness is not achieved by the conscious pursuit of happiness; it is generally the by-product of other activities.”
    ― Aldous Huxley

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjO62l8ewYw
    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia

     

    According to wikipedia, the oldest complete surviving Talmud was written in 1289 AD in Rome, Italy and published in Constantinople.

    I suppose the Islamic Golden Age libraries in Iraq have yet to be discovered, or that it's an unrealistic expectation to find a Babylonian Talmud in Babylon.

    As an added twist, wikipedia states: "After the publication of the Bomberg edition of the Jerusalem Talmud [1523] the Leiden Talmud was lost for around three hundred years. It was only to be rediscovered in the mid nineteenth century in the Library of the city of Leiden"
    , @bored identity
    Talmud also deals with some hypothetically very prosaic issues, such as :



    "With God's help, to His Honor, my dear Rabbi,

    Would it be OU, OK, Kof-K, and Star-K certified if I hogtie this neighbor-guy (goy?) in his own house, and then just leave and fuggedaboutit for a couple of weeks before I come back to check on him?

    I am asking for a friend."



    THE ANSWER:


    http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_77.html#E85


     

  177. @bob sykes
    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    So they hire a three-time lose like James Earl Ray for the job?

    The Urban League was a social work organization that didn’t invest in civil right agitation until Whitney Young was appointed executive director in 1961. Young died in 1971 and by 1983 the Urban League had retired from the public protest business. (Coretta King organized a commemorative march in 1983 and the Urban League begged off). By the time Whitney Young was on board, King had been a consequential public figure for a half-dozen years.

    CORE was from 1942 to 1966 run by its founder, James Farmer. He voluntarily departed in 1966 and was only an intermittent presence in public life from that point onward; he eventually landed a teaching job at a modest black college and remained there until his retirement in 1998.

    As for the NAACP, can you please explain why the 67 year old Roy Wilkins (whose public prominence hardly antedated King’s) would order a hit on a man he’d worked co-operatively with for a dozen years?

    The Head Negro in Charge prior to King wasn’t any of these men. It was Philip Randolph, who ran one of the rail unions. Randolph in 1968 was 79 years old and on the verge of retirement.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    That's the problem with conspiracy theories - these supposedly all powerful organizations with unlimited resources keep hiring guys and gals (Ray, Oswald, Sirhan, Hinckley, Fromme, etc.) that you wouldn't count on to deliver a pizza to the right address, let alone carry out super-secret missions of global importance.

    The sad thing about these assassinations (which make it clear that we are living in Clown World now) is that our institutions are run by such idiots that these sad sack losers are able to get past all the defenses and strike at important targets. It's one thing if some Tom Cruise Mission Impossible type super-spy is able to outwit our best forces but when a bunch of nutjobs, fanatics and other folks who are clearly several sandwiches shy of a full picnic are able to do so, that really tells you something.
  178. MLK was a useful enough front man for Stanley Levison, that he had such weaknesses was likely a bonus. I believe the tail chasing minister is a common theme of black jokes.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    What did Levison ever do that you'd get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?
  179. @Paleo Liberal
    There were other reasons why the statues of Robert E Lee went up and stayed up in the post Civil War era, until recent times.

    The South has had a strong military tradition since colonial times. The Lee Family was a big part of that tradition.

    In the 100 years following Reconstruction, the US was involved in Indian wars, the Spanish American War, two World Wars, adventures in various third world nations, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

    It is not clear that a divided nation would have done as well in those wars. The US couldn’t say “F U crackers “ and expected to put together a viable army.

    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.

    Well the Democrat Party certainly needs (and gets) black votes today a lot more than it needs white votes in the South so R.E. Lee (or at least his statue) is nowadays in danger in any Democrat ruled part of the South. For the most part, this means big cities, cities with universities, and the states that border on Washington, D.C. I don’t think that most whites in the South have really changed their views on REL but whites are not really in charge anymore in some places. The views haven’t changed but the voter demographics have.

  180. @Whiskey
    More along the lines of Jim Beam Rye.

    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other, keeping it real vs picket fence, that one must dominate and rule the other. Either it's Nipsey Hustle all the way down or Ike. No middle ground. Whites particularly women want Nipsey.

    Ikr was too boring.

    I think MLK will be rehabbed. Into an exciting pump like figure for Blacks to emulate and White women to find exciting in an aspiring rapper way.

    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other,

    Blacks have long had more disorganized domestic lives than the rest of the population, and have a lower propensity to save money. Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965. You have a critical mass of lumpenproletarian hoods who make most black neighborhoods a trial to live in, but the people experiencing the trial are ordinary wage-earners. The lifeways of a comfortable majority aren’t antagonistic. The problem is in the tail of the bell curve.

    • Replies: @Jack D

    Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965.
     
    It depends which metrics. Sure, if you are talking about things like out of wedlock birth and opiate addiction, in some measures whites have surpassed the Negroes of 1965. But in general, we live in a far richer country today and if the black population of 1965 could live like today's average whites they would have felt like they had died and gone to heaven. Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women. In the case of black women in 1965 (and today) it indicated messy personal lives of men coming and going so you might have 5 children by 6 different men (not really sure whether child #3 belongs to A or B). For today's white single mother she is well aware of who the father is - it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.
    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965

     

    Does murder/rape per 100k count towards disorganization? Do whites even come to a fraction of 1965 black levels?
  181. @Ptui!
    Hey speaking of ah, er historical reckonings, what does Garrow have to say about William Pepper's forensic proof and documentation that government officials blew King's face off, smothered him with a pillow and horked on him?

    Any new poop on the government inter-agency war council CINCSTRIKE that coordinated CIA, FBI, NSA, ODNI and The Army Security Agency (the only ones with negroes) who infiltrated King's NGO and taped him while the 20th Special Forces Group trained civic-minded Klan wizards and stole guns for mob hit men? How bout General William Yarborough, (cue ♬ duh-duh-duh, duhduh duh-duh duhh) dispatching death squads from the 902nd Military Intelligence Group, with NSA SR-71 blackbirds, Zoom, zoom! overhead as Frank Strausser of the Memphis PD whacked him and hopped in a cop car?

    Oh and what'd he say about Dem party hero Jesse Jackson, who got his senator job by fucking up the only real job he ever had, starting the gunfight to get King killed in the 902nd's bazooka crossfire?

    Jesse Jackson was never a Senator, although he was the unpaid “Shadow Senator” from Washington, D.C. which is a non-existent position Constitutionally speaking. If they had elected him the Grand Vizier and Major Poobah of Warshington it would have had the same legal significance – i.e. none.

  182. @Art Deco
    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other,

    Blacks have long had more disorganized domestic lives than the rest of the population, and have a lower propensity to save money. Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965. You have a critical mass of lumpenproletarian hoods who make most black neighborhoods a trial to live in, but the people experiencing the trial are ordinary wage-earners. The lifeways of a comfortable majority aren't antagonistic. The problem is in the tail of the bell curve.

    Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965.

    It depends which metrics. Sure, if you are talking about things like out of wedlock birth and opiate addiction, in some measures whites have surpassed the Negroes of 1965. But in general, we live in a far richer country today and if the black population of 1965 could live like today’s average whites they would have felt like they had died and gone to heaven. Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women. In the case of black women in 1965 (and today) it indicated messy personal lives of men coming and going so you might have 5 children by 6 different men (not really sure whether child #3 belongs to A or B). For today’s white single mother she is well aware of who the father is – it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women...
    For today’s white single mother she is well aware of who the father is – it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.
     
    Or caring about the welfare of the child:

    Some 40-plus years ago, I had a baby without being married or partnered — and without, to my astonishment, the support of any of my “hippy” countercultural friends. As I was doing something bold, I expected them to hover round with offers of baby-sitting, home-cooked meals, etc. Didn’t happen.

    As it turned out, my daughter has reproached me her whole life for depriving her of a full-time father.


    I’ve concluded that one person hasn’t the moral right to decide whether another person will have two parents. Certainly things happen, folks change, we marry unwisely, people die, etc. But to make the choice without any input from the person most affected — an unseen, unknown child — seems to me now to have been supremely arrogant.

    https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2010/06/09/carolyn-hax-give-child-power-to-withstand-creepy-relative/
     
    The white adults of 1965 would have viewed these women with more disdain, as they don't have the excuse of being black and stupid.
    , @Art Deco
    ?

    The total fertility rate of black women in the U.S. is 2.1 children per woman per lifetime. Nowadays, the 1st child is typically the issue of a tryst around age 23 and the 2d the issue of the woman's husband. I'm not seeing how this differs from out-of-wedlock child-bearing among white women today.
  183. @Bill P
    The MLK cult is the closest thing the US has to state-sponsored religion, so Garrow is wise to avoid publishing here.

    However, the King theology is getting shopworn, as it at least nominally supported equality and harmony between the races. The new progressive ideology is basically an inversion of Nazism in which white Christians must be crushed and destroyed.

    As for King himself, I doubt he had any consistent theology at all. He just stole other people's ideas and let others write his speeches while he engaged in extremely hypocritical behavior behind the scenes.

    In that respect, he wasn't much better than the pederast Catholic priests of his generation. Just about all you could say in his favor is "at least he wasn't sodomizing boys."

    However, the King theology is getting shopworn, as it at least nominally supported equality and harmony between the races. The new progressive ideology is basically an inversion of Nazism in which white Christians must be crushed and destroyed.

    It’s more like what Nazism was an inversion of.

    • Agree: Prester John
  184. @Art Deco
    It has always seemed to me that the most likely suspects in his killing were the heads of the NAACP, CORE, the Urban League, et al. The MSM that lionized King also pushed aside the existing civil rights leadership in his favor, and marginalized them. They had adequate grievances to kill King.

    So they hire a three-time lose like James Earl Ray for the job?


    The Urban League was a social work organization that didn't invest in civil right agitation until Whitney Young was appointed executive director in 1961. Young died in 1971 and by 1983 the Urban League had retired from the public protest business. (Coretta King organized a commemorative march in 1983 and the Urban League begged off). By the time Whitney Young was on board, King had been a consequential public figure for a half-dozen years.

    CORE was from 1942 to 1966 run by its founder, James Farmer. He voluntarily departed in 1966 and was only an intermittent presence in public life from that point onward; he eventually landed a teaching job at a modest black college and remained there until his retirement in 1998.

    As for the NAACP, can you please explain why the 67 year old Roy Wilkins (whose public prominence hardly antedated King's) would order a hit on a man he'd worked co-operatively with for a dozen years?

    The Head Negro in Charge prior to King wasn't any of these men. It was Philip Randolph, who ran one of the rail unions. Randolph in 1968 was 79 years old and on the verge of retirement.

    That’s the problem with conspiracy theories – these supposedly all powerful organizations with unlimited resources keep hiring guys and gals (Ray, Oswald, Sirhan, Hinckley, Fromme, etc.) that you wouldn’t count on to deliver a pizza to the right address, let alone carry out super-secret missions of global importance.

    The sad thing about these assassinations (which make it clear that we are living in Clown World now) is that our institutions are run by such idiots that these sad sack losers are able to get past all the defenses and strike at important targets. It’s one thing if some Tom Cruise Mission Impossible type super-spy is able to outwit our best forces but when a bunch of nutjobs, fanatics and other folks who are clearly several sandwiches shy of a full picnic are able to do so, that really tells you something.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    There haven't been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted. Members of Congress and federal trial judges do not have personal security details.

    In re the attempts on Reagan and Ford, Michael Kinsley suggested that American officials go to school with their British and Israeli counterparts and eliminate the PR bally-hoo which requires all an officials' movements be broadcast in advance. Kinsley also noted that the security apparatus as is is so large and obtrusive that it telegraphs its presence. That doesn't say much about 'our institutions'. It does say something about the mental habits of our politicians and about the Secret Service (which has manifest performance problems).

    In re MLK, again, private citizens seldom have security details. It's bloody expensive. In re RFK, it wasn't done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren't needed. Prior to 1965, former Presidents had no security detail. Mrs. Kennedy lost her detail when she remarried.

    Both George Wallace and John Kennedy had disregarded advice and protocol that day. Not seeing how 'institutions' bear responsibility for that.
  185. @L Woods
    DR3 has never and will never work.

    https://www.thegreenhead.com/imgs/xl/looming-strawman-scary-lifesize-animatronic-lunging-scarecrow-xl.jpg

    No onr has the balls to use DR4.

    The fourth R being “right”. Or “realistic”.

  186. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Z Blog
    Another good example of the Progressive conditioning. You're grasping at any straw to defend King, because you have been conditioned to believe anti-racism is the highest virtue.

    It's why conservatism has been such a complete bust.

    [quote]You’re grasping at any straw to defend King, because you have been conditioned to believe anti-racism is the highest virtue.[/quote]

    Even though I freely admitted above that his philandering was well documented?

    Unless I’m misunderstanding something, the author read an FBI agent’s summary of a transcript of a recording. How exactly did he know he was hearing a rape? What does a rape sound like? “Help, help, stop raping me”? Pretty remarkable that he could discern that over MLK’s laughter. Wireless microphones in the mid-1960s were much higher quality than I would have guessed.

    Judging by your blog, you don’t seem to trust the FBI’s reports of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, but you do trust them here. As is usually the case on this blog, skepticism is a selective thing: give white men the maximum benefit of the doubt, believe anything negative about anybody with dark skin.

  187. @Jack D

    Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965.
     
    It depends which metrics. Sure, if you are talking about things like out of wedlock birth and opiate addiction, in some measures whites have surpassed the Negroes of 1965. But in general, we live in a far richer country today and if the black population of 1965 could live like today's average whites they would have felt like they had died and gone to heaven. Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women. In the case of black women in 1965 (and today) it indicated messy personal lives of men coming and going so you might have 5 children by 6 different men (not really sure whether child #3 belongs to A or B). For today's white single mother she is well aware of who the father is - it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.

    Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women…
    For today’s white single mother she is well aware of who the father is – it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.

    Or caring about the welfare of the child:

    Some 40-plus years ago, I had a baby without being married or partnered — and without, to my astonishment, the support of any of my “hippy” countercultural friends. As I was doing something bold, I expected them to hover round with offers of baby-sitting, home-cooked meals, etc. Didn’t happen.

    As it turned out, my daughter has reproached me her whole life for depriving her of a full-time father.

    I’ve concluded that one person hasn’t the moral right to decide whether another person will have two parents. Certainly things happen, folks change, we marry unwisely, people die, etc. But to make the choice without any input from the person most affected — an unseen, unknown child — seems to me now to have been supremely arrogant.

    https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2010/06/09/carolyn-hax-give-child-power-to-withstand-creepy-relative/

    The white adults of 1965 would have viewed these women with more disdain, as they don’t have the excuse of being black and stupid.

  188. @LondonBob
    MLK was a useful enough front man for Stanley Levison, that he had such weaknesses was likely a bonus. I believe the tail chasing minister is a common theme of black jokes.

    What did Levison ever do that you’d get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?

    • Replies: @Crawfurdmuir

    What did Levison ever do that you’d get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?
     
    I know nothing about Levison's "psi-power," but can tell you that he was the CPUSA money man in charge of funding King's activities. The CPUSA had been funding agitation in the US black community since the 1930s, e.g., engaging a lawyer for the "Scottsboro Boys," and in this activity it had been a conduit for monies sent by the Soviet Union. King was an alumnus of the Highlander Folk School, a communist front in east Tennessee, as was Rosa Parks. The entire so-called civil rights movement at that time was substantially an organ for Soviet political interference in and destabilization of the American political order.
  189. The boomer conservatives on FreeRepublic mostly don’t believe these allegations, don’t care and don’t want to hear about it:

    http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3752500/posts

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    The boomer conservatives on FreeRepublic mostly don’t believe these allegations, don’t care and don’t want to hear about it:
     
    I'm shocked! Free Republic is still going?

    I think it was 20 years last month that I logged out for good. Except for one visit in 2000, to defend our own Steve. For which I was banned.
  190. @Jack D
    That's the problem with conspiracy theories - these supposedly all powerful organizations with unlimited resources keep hiring guys and gals (Ray, Oswald, Sirhan, Hinckley, Fromme, etc.) that you wouldn't count on to deliver a pizza to the right address, let alone carry out super-secret missions of global importance.

    The sad thing about these assassinations (which make it clear that we are living in Clown World now) is that our institutions are run by such idiots that these sad sack losers are able to get past all the defenses and strike at important targets. It's one thing if some Tom Cruise Mission Impossible type super-spy is able to outwit our best forces but when a bunch of nutjobs, fanatics and other folks who are clearly several sandwiches shy of a full picnic are able to do so, that really tells you something.

    There haven’t been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted. Members of Congress and federal trial judges do not have personal security details.

    In re the attempts on Reagan and Ford, Michael Kinsley suggested that American officials go to school with their British and Israeli counterparts and eliminate the PR bally-hoo which requires all an officials’ movements be broadcast in advance. Kinsley also noted that the security apparatus as is is so large and obtrusive that it telegraphs its presence. That doesn’t say much about ‘our institutions’. It does say something about the mental habits of our politicians and about the Secret Service (which has manifest performance problems).

    In re MLK, again, private citizens seldom have security details. It’s bloody expensive. In re RFK, it wasn’t done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren’t needed. Prior to 1965, former Presidents had no security detail. Mrs. Kennedy lost her detail when she remarried.

    Both George Wallace and John Kennedy had disregarded advice and protocol that day. Not seeing how ‘institutions’ bear responsibility for that.

    • Replies: @Mister.Baseball

    There haven’t been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted.
     
    The Republican congressional baseball team was another attempt of note.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    There haven’t been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years...
     
    ...in America. The Netherlands, never a hotbed of assassins, opened the millennium with Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh.

    In re RFK, it wasn’t done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren’t needed.
     
    RFK's bodyguard in Los Angeles was Rosey Grier. Evidently, Dan Reeves wasn't paying him enough to get by, so Rosey had to moonlight.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lUtRPTZ19M&feature=youtu.be
    , @David In TN
    William Manchester, in his book The Death of a President, made an astute observation. The shot hit JFK below the throat. The driver of the Presidential car was trained to upon hearing a shot, to hit the accelerator and MOVE.

    However, the driver slowed down and looked behind him, as complete an act of utter stupidity as can be imagined. Had he done what he was trained to do, JFK probably would have survived the first bullet that hit him and likely wouldn't have been hit again.

    Manchester was angry at the Secret Service driver and always said Oswald was the killer and acted alone. Manchester did follow the party line in not taking Oswald's Marxism-Communism seriously.

    RFK during his 1968 run insisted on riding around in an open convertible and plunging into crowds. He refused to employ professional bodyguards. The Secret Service didn't give protection to all candidates until after RFK's assassination.

    His "protection" the night he was shot was a washed-up ex-FBI agent/family retainer, Rosey Grier, and Rafer Johnson. They were trailing behind RFK instead of being in front, alongside, and on the lookout.
  191. @Jack D
    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary - it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam's Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK's chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.

    in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin’ around with them Roman soldiers
    You forgot to mention taking credit for the execution of Jesus and the claim that he is burning in eternity in hell..

    and you also for got to mention that It was seen as a heretical sect by mainstream talmudic Judaism and heavily persecute (Paul of course was the son of a Rabbi and actively persecuting Christian) that is perfect ‘reasonable’ for mainstream Judaism, just as the mainstream (RC) Christian church would persercute protestants a millennium later.

    You also forgot to mention it was so filled with anti-christian vile that it was one of the reasons for Isabel expelling Jews from castille.

    So I think your comment underplays the hostility of Judaism towards Christianity.. of course, any orthodox priest who gets spit on every week by jews knows they have an enormous amount of hatred towards Christianity.

  192. @Hippopotamusdrome
    OT:
    (((Yair Netanyahu)))
    Dear Arabs and Muslims. Want to free occupied Arab Islamic lands? Here’s a good start!
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7cGGFbXsAIcfL7.jpg

    Unlike Gaza there does not seem to be a desire by North African locals to overthrow Spanish rule. As near as I can determine Muslim citizens of the 2 places are full citizens of Spain. The cities are called autonomous, I don’t know if that is an issue.

  193. @Jack D

    Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965.
     
    It depends which metrics. Sure, if you are talking about things like out of wedlock birth and opiate addiction, in some measures whites have surpassed the Negroes of 1965. But in general, we live in a far richer country today and if the black population of 1965 could live like today's average whites they would have felt like they had died and gone to heaven. Single motherhood is a completely different thing today among white women. In the case of black women in 1965 (and today) it indicated messy personal lives of men coming and going so you might have 5 children by 6 different men (not really sure whether child #3 belongs to A or B). For today's white single mother she is well aware of who the father is - it is the guy from the sperm donor catalog and she has the means to raise this child on her own without depending on welfare.

    ?

    The total fertility rate of black women in the U.S. is 2.1 children per woman per lifetime. Nowadays, the 1st child is typically the issue of a tryst around age 23 and the 2d the issue of the woman’s husband. I’m not seeing how this differs from out-of-wedlock child-bearing among white women today.

  194. @Crawfurdmuir
    Among documents relating mainly to the Kennedy assassination that were released in 2018 was a FBI report entitled "Martin Luther King, Jr., A Current Analysis." This included much about King's womanizing and his association with members of the Communist Party of the USA, in particular Stanley Levison. It may be found at the following link:

    https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf

    Curiously, at the time, none other than David Garrow was cited in the Washington Post as responding to this document as follows:

    David Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and historian who had written extensively about King, said much of the explosive allegations in the document are neither new nor true.

    “The number one thing I’ve learned in 40 years of doing this, is just because you see it in a top-secret document, just because someone had said it to the FBI, doesn’t mean it’s all accurate,” Garrow told The Washington Post, citing the infamous dossier that contains salacious allegations against President Trump.
     
    Now Garrow appears to have done a volte-face about the behavior attributed to King in the 1968 report. This is one of the more curious aspects about all of this. Enough of the unflattering information about King has been confirmed by other sources, not least of them his own associates (e.g., Ralph Abernathy). Most of the "mainstream" media simply ignored this. Is Garrow now reversing his earlier dismissal of the FBI's "Current Analysis" document just because he has found new and more persuasive evidence, or does he have some other motive? I'd guess the latter.

    What’s interesting about all this is the “What else is new?” aspect. King’s womanizing–like JFK’s–was known for years. As in the case of JFK, when the media picks out someone as their secular Jesus who will somehow save us from ourselves and the word gets out that he (or she i.e. Hillary) are just as screwed-up as the rest of us pilgrims, they play make-believe. King will remain a hero to such as the readership of Slate and the Gray Hag, most of whom dwell in a make-believe environment.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    . King’s womanizing–like JFK’s–was known for years. A

    Known by whom?
  195. He may have fucked around a lot for a rev., but he had more boulevards named after him than any man in history and triggered as much reformation as the original protest man, Martin Luther.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    but he had more boulevards named after him
     
    Why is it always a boulevard?

    This reminds me of Bill James's jab at Kansas City:

    At every insurgence of the national media, Kansas City press packets were handed out repeating a number of overworked boasts about the place. "Kansas City has more fountains than Rome." . . . "Kansas City has more miles of boulevards than Paris." This one always conjures up images of the International Board of Boulevard Certification, walking along saying "No, I'm afraid this one is just an 'Avenue' unless you widen the curb space by four more inches and plant six more trees per half mile." . . . The city's image would improve a lot of they would just accept themselves for what they are, and stop handing out malarkey about how many miles of boulevard they have.

    https://blog.plover.com/Kansas-state-quarter.html
     
    , @Anonymous
    Any boulevard named after MLK is a dirty one:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIOl8i9Kdg
    , @PV van der Byl
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7hJxWr1TKK8
  196. @Anon
    MLK's sexual indiscretions have been an open secret for decades.

    The British MSM isn't as PC, so this type of stuff is more mentionable over there.

    Indeed–going back to the 60s. The American MSM, however, has long since elevated King to sainthood so–it’s all moot. It’ll be entertaining though to watch all the usual suspects twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend King (watch Hoover get a ritual spanking) before pulling the inevitable race card. Perhaps we might even see an appearance from MacArthur Genius Coates himself.

  197. @AceDeuce
    That's not quite true. Hoover was carrying out orders from his boss, AG Robert Kennedy, who was carrying out orders from his boss/brother President Kennedy. JFK issued a covert Executive Order to surveil King in October, 1963. The primary reason was King's Communist ties, which the Kennedys had repeatedly warned King about, to no avail.

    Both Garrow and Taylor Branch, to name two King biographers, have recounted, in previous books, some published many years ago, similar sex stories based on FBI transcripts, including February 22, 1964 tapes from an L.A. trip, taped at a hotel where King, viewing on TV some recorded footage of JFK's funeral (it was the 3 month anniversary of his death) laughed at seeing Jackie kiss the casket. King supposedly said that she kissed the coffin in the middle because "that's the part she'll miss most" and made other snide references to her fellating JFK's corpse.

    If memory serves, that trip to L.A. also captured tapes of an orgy King participated in.

    Hoover told Bobby about King's JFK comments, BTW, and Bobby told Jackie, hence the "mysterious" reason why Jackie was on record as having little use for King.

    Those and other biographers have also referenced in their books a hushed up scandal from King's trip to Oslo to accept his Nobel Prize. Members of his entourage, including his brother-another "reverend", had parties with hookers. The party went south and cops were called. Not sure if MLK was a participant or not, but---what do you think? King's henchman Bayard Rustin defused the incident with the hotel people and cops by playing the race card.

    What was Gay Bayard doing there?.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    He was part of King's entourage and staying in the hotel.
  198. @Jake
    MLK was a Wilt Chamberlain level pus-hound. And at least in streaks, he liked them young. My bet would be that at a minimum, while he was a Civil Rights preacher traveling to do selfless good and become the Black Messiah, MLK had his way with several hundred females, 2 or 3 dozen of which were underage.

    There also was a lot of dope in the MLK inner circle, far more than most people can imagine possible before Woodstock. And definitely more than a bit of sodomy, including pederasty.

    Making MLK your moral icon is like making Sly Stone your professor of Moral Philosophy with Little Richard his confessor.

    Which 2 groups made MLK that moral icon? It sure as all Hell was not any form of white southerner. It wasn't Irish Catholics, or Italian or Polish or Czech/Slovak or Croatian or Spanish or Portuguese or Mexican Catholics. It wasn't any Eastern Orthodox. It wasn't lower midwestern Scots-Irish.

    It was WASP Elites and Jews. Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    Didn’t know about the drugs but–wouldn’t be surprised. Nevertheless, bingo!!

    • Replies: @TheJester
    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    I once read a Princeton History of the United States written in the 1890s. It highlighted that cocaine abuse and violence were key social characteristics of black communities ... with perhaps the former driving the latter. Given that, it is extremely likely that Martin Luther King and his cadre were very familiar with the enticements of drug-enhanced sex that increases the libido while suspending one's judgment with respect to the risks and consequences of impulsive, over-the-edge behaviors.

    MLK having impersonal and anonymous sex with hundreds of women has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK telling jokes while watching a fellow minister "rape" a woman has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK and his cadre servicing multiple prostitutes in an orgy the night he was killed has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. QED
  199. @Bruce County
    I luagh when people bring that little tidbit of history up. The Playboy interview. I for one have read it many times times. He's a stark raving fucking lunatic. Like this part.
    Playboy: Along with the other civil rights leaders, you have often proposed a massive program of economic aid, financed by the Federal Government, to improve the lot of the nation's 20,000,000 Negroes. Just one of the projects you've mentioned, however—the HARYOU-ACT program to provide jobs for Negro youths—is expected to cost $141,000,000 over the next ten years, and that includes only Harlem. A nationwide program such as you propose would undoubtedly run into the billions.

    King: About 50 billion, actually—which is less than one year of our present defense spending. It is my belief that with the expenditure of this amount, over a ten-year period, a genuine and dramatic transformation could be achieved in the conditions of Negro life in America. I am positive, moreover, that the money spent would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils.

    Playboy: If Negroes are also granted preferential treatment in housing, as you propose, how would you allay the alarm with which many white homeowners, fearing property devaluation, greet the arrival of Negroes in hitherto all white neighborhoods?

    King: We must expunge from our society the myths and half-truths that engender such groundless fears as these. In the first place, there is no truth to the myth that Negroes depreciate property.
    There are more juicy bits one can laugh at..Heres the link if anyone needs to expel their coffee onto the monitor..
    https://playboysfw.kinja.com/martin-luther-king-jr-a-candid-conversation-with-the-n-1502354861

    King does not sound stupid here–he’s merely spouting the kind of crap that race hustlers thrive on–MLK, like Obama, was basically a parasite

  200. @Jack D
    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary - it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam's Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK's chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.

    To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam’s Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier.

    Yeah, but it was pretty much SOP in the ancient world for political and religious leaders to be of virgin birth, including Krishna, Buddha, Plato, Dionysus, Hercules, and Osirisis. Virgin birth and resurrection from the dead were also much more common than today, though I would not be surprised if Donald Trump were to claim virgin birth if he thought it would win him a few votes. (Resurrection from the dead would be harder to pull off.)

    There were also irregularities in the birth of Moses who was allegedly found floating in the Nile, by an Egyptian princess doing her dirty laundry and raised as an Egyptian. Now how exactly did this story about him really being a Hebrew who had survived one of the periodic massacres of the innocents that were such a feature of life in Biblical times get out when he was an adult and running in the Hebrew leadership primaries with his Hebrexit policy?

    I actually remember reading that someone who knew the writer Aldous Huxley once said something like “he seemed like an angel in our midst, and it was hard to believe that he was human born,” so it seems that there is a natural human tendency to perceive great men as supernatural, especially if you yourself are uneducated.

    “Happiness is not achieved by the conscious pursuit of happiness; it is generally the by-product of other activities.”
    ― Aldous Huxley

    • Replies: @Jack D
    Moses's childhood is one of the less unbelievable parts of his story - at least he wasn't raised by wolves. However, later on there are certainly supernatural elements involving the parting of the Red Sea, the Burning Bush and so on. Adam and Eve are better examples of virgin birth but I guess they are needed in order to solve the "chicken or egg" issue in the story line. But after that I don't think there are any more stories of virgin birth in the Jewish scriptures. However, Sarah giving birth at age 90 is almost as miraculous (read unbelievable) as a virgin birth. The idea of an angel appearing in order to announce some coming miraculous event was also pretty common in the Jewish scriptures.

    The virgin birth story appears only in the Gospels of "Matthew" and "Luke", which were not written by Matthew and Luke but maybe 80 to 100 years after the death of Jesus when all eyewitnesses to his birth would have been dead. As you say, it was pretty common to boost your favorite guru's street cred by pronouncing that he was the product of virgin birth and/or had pulled off various miracles. Just being a preacher or a wise man was not enough - if the gods favored your man, he should be able to show some sort of superpower to show that he was no ordinary mortal.
  201. @Jonathan Mason
    He may have fucked around a lot for a rev., but he had more boulevards named after him than any man in history and triggered as much reformation as the original protest man, Martin Luther.

    but he had more boulevards named after him

    Why is it always a boulevard?

    This reminds me of Bill James’s jab at Kansas City:

    At every insurgence of the national media, Kansas City press packets were handed out repeating a number of overworked boasts about the place. “Kansas City has more fountains than Rome.” . . . “Kansas City has more miles of boulevards than Paris.” This one always conjures up images of the International Board of Boulevard Certification, walking along saying “No, I’m afraid this one is just an ‘Avenue’ unless you widen the curb space by four more inches and plant six more trees per half mile.” . . . The city’s image would improve a lot of they would just accept themselves for what they are, and stop handing out malarkey about how many miles of boulevard they have.

    https://blog.plover.com/Kansas-state-quarter.html

  202. Ot: looks like a mini juicy smollet hate hoax

    Subway rider lied about anti-gay attack, was actually aggressor: cops: https://nypost.com/2019/05/27/subway-rider-lied-about-anti-gay-attack-was-actually-aggressor-cops/

  203. @bomag
    I imagine the info is out there in print somewhere. KGB archives, if nothing else.

    I've always figured he was the face and voice of a movement. His chaotic personal life doesn't promote the notion of someone with high end organizational skills.

    The Left covers for their icons much better than the Right. I was always puzzled by Robert Byrd's ability to be taken seriously.

    I believe Robert Byrd was taken very seriously by Republicans and Democrats. He was one of the longer serving senators and for many years chair of the Appropriations Committee. If a fellow senator wanted something appropriated for his district he had to pay obeisance to Mr Byrd. He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I’believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland. He was an expert on parliamentary rules and used that to his advantage many times during floor debate, In the long gone days when I watched Senate proceedings on C-Span Bryd was the picture of the well-groomed and manicured Southern politician dwelling at great length on obscure subjects and often reciting lengthy poems from memory. For an ex-Klansman the old boy did quite well.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland.
     
    Gibson Guitar would have been happy to see that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson_Byrdland

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5wYsy0KbTI
    , @Steve Sailer
    My impression is that mid-Century southern states tended to be pretty adept at identifying the most gifted legislators of each generation and electing them young to Congress and then over and over, where they built up huge seniority and brought home lots of bacon: Byrd, Thurmond, Russell, etc.

    Perhaps this was due to Jim Crow southern states disenfranchising a lot of poor whites, so that the electorates were pretty elite. If the state bar society, say, felt that this young man was The Guy to represent our state in Washington, that message tended to get out to eligible voters.

  204. anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve read his gigantic Obama biography Rising Star.

    Thank you for your service.

    • LOL: Kylie
  205. How did he get 1,472 pages out of the life of Obama? That’s pretty obsessive.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    It's not a hugely interesting 1,472 pages.
    , @Art Deco
    That includes the 400 pages of reference material (among which are 270 pages of notes and 36 pages of bibliography). The narrative runs to just shy of 1,100 pages.

    3.8%: Cold open about Chicago (in re a period of time he wasn't living there).
    6.1%: Early life
    8.2%: College and brief private-sector employment
    12.1%: Alinskyite community organizing in Chicago
    12.2%: Law school & summer clerking
    7.8%: 1st book, academic employment, firm employment, marriage
    12.1%: Running for legislature, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, sitting in legislature.
    11.3%: Sitting in legislature, falling to Bobby Rush
    15.2%: Senate campaign
    6.5%: Congress (concludes with beginning of Pres. campaign)
    4.6%: Epilogue

    I'm wondering in the 164 pages devoted to his Senate campaign if Garrow managed to smoke out who kept feeding confidential paperwork on his opponents' divorce proceedings to the Chicago media (and if Garrow got an explanation from figures in the media as to why the stuff wasn't immediately returned unread).

  206. @Art Deco
    There haven't been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted. Members of Congress and federal trial judges do not have personal security details.

    In re the attempts on Reagan and Ford, Michael Kinsley suggested that American officials go to school with their British and Israeli counterparts and eliminate the PR bally-hoo which requires all an officials' movements be broadcast in advance. Kinsley also noted that the security apparatus as is is so large and obtrusive that it telegraphs its presence. That doesn't say much about 'our institutions'. It does say something about the mental habits of our politicians and about the Secret Service (which has manifest performance problems).

    In re MLK, again, private citizens seldom have security details. It's bloody expensive. In re RFK, it wasn't done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren't needed. Prior to 1965, former Presidents had no security detail. Mrs. Kennedy lost her detail when she remarried.

    Both George Wallace and John Kennedy had disregarded advice and protocol that day. Not seeing how 'institutions' bear responsibility for that.

    There haven’t been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted.

    The Republican congressional baseball team was another attempt of note.

  207. @Buffalo Joe
    Ben, I have a bottle of JW Blue, need an ice cube though. I'm guessing Whiskey is closer to Everclear than JW Blue.

    The juice from too wet corn silage, I’d say.

  208. @Art Deco
    There haven't been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted. Members of Congress and federal trial judges do not have personal security details.

    In re the attempts on Reagan and Ford, Michael Kinsley suggested that American officials go to school with their British and Israeli counterparts and eliminate the PR bally-hoo which requires all an officials' movements be broadcast in advance. Kinsley also noted that the security apparatus as is is so large and obtrusive that it telegraphs its presence. That doesn't say much about 'our institutions'. It does say something about the mental habits of our politicians and about the Secret Service (which has manifest performance problems).

    In re MLK, again, private citizens seldom have security details. It's bloody expensive. In re RFK, it wasn't done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren't needed. Prior to 1965, former Presidents had no security detail. Mrs. Kennedy lost her detail when she remarried.

    Both George Wallace and John Kennedy had disregarded advice and protocol that day. Not seeing how 'institutions' bear responsibility for that.

    There haven’t been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years…

    …in America. The Netherlands, never a hotbed of assassins, opened the millennium with Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh.

    In re RFK, it wasn’t done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren’t needed.

    RFK’s bodyguard in Los Angeles was Rosey Grier. Evidently, Dan Reeves wasn’t paying him enough to get by, so Rosey had to moonlight.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lUtRPTZ19M&feature=youtu.be

  209. @The Anti-Gnostic
    How did he get 1,472 pages out of the life of Obama? That's pretty obsessive.

    It’s not a hugely interesting 1,472 pages.

  210. @Jonathan Mason

    To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam’s Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier.
     
    Yeah, but it was pretty much SOP in the ancient world for political and religious leaders to be of virgin birth, including Krishna, Buddha, Plato, Dionysus, Hercules, and Osirisis. Virgin birth and resurrection from the dead were also much more common than today, though I would not be surprised if Donald Trump were to claim virgin birth if he thought it would win him a few votes. (Resurrection from the dead would be harder to pull off.)

    There were also irregularities in the birth of Moses who was allegedly found floating in the Nile, by an Egyptian princess doing her dirty laundry and raised as an Egyptian. Now how exactly did this story about him really being a Hebrew who had survived one of the periodic massacres of the innocents that were such a feature of life in Biblical times get out when he was an adult and running in the Hebrew leadership primaries with his Hebrexit policy?

    I actually remember reading that someone who knew the writer Aldous Huxley once said something like "he seemed like an angel in our midst, and it was hard to believe that he was human born," so it seems that there is a natural human tendency to perceive great men as supernatural, especially if you yourself are uneducated.

    “Happiness is not achieved by the conscious pursuit of happiness; it is generally the by-product of other activities.”
    ― Aldous Huxley

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjO62l8ewYw

    Moses’s childhood is one of the less unbelievable parts of his story – at least he wasn’t raised by wolves. However, later on there are certainly supernatural elements involving the parting of the Red Sea, the Burning Bush and so on. Adam and Eve are better examples of virgin birth but I guess they are needed in order to solve the “chicken or egg” issue in the story line. But after that I don’t think there are any more stories of virgin birth in the Jewish scriptures. However, Sarah giving birth at age 90 is almost as miraculous (read unbelievable) as a virgin birth. The idea of an angel appearing in order to announce some coming miraculous event was also pretty common in the Jewish scriptures.

    The virgin birth story appears only in the Gospels of “Matthew” and “Luke”, which were not written by Matthew and Luke but maybe 80 to 100 years after the death of Jesus when all eyewitnesses to his birth would have been dead. As you say, it was pretty common to boost your favorite guru’s street cred by pronouncing that he was the product of virgin birth and/or had pulled off various miracles. Just being a preacher or a wise man was not enough – if the gods favored your man, he should be able to show some sort of superpower to show that he was no ordinary mortal.

    • Replies: @Hank Yobo
    You might want to delve into Paul's use of παραδίδωμι before discounting the veracity of oral tradition within the early Church.
  211. @Prester John
    What's interesting about all this is the "What else is new?" aspect. King's womanizing--like JFK's--was known for years. As in the case of JFK, when the media picks out someone as their secular Jesus who will somehow save us from ourselves and the word gets out that he (or she i.e. Hillary) are just as screwed-up as the rest of us pilgrims, they play make-believe. King will remain a hero to such as the readership of Slate and the Gray Hag, most of whom dwell in a make-believe environment.

    . King’s womanizing–like JFK’s–was known for years. A

    Known by whom?

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    Known by whom?
     
    By the people who matter, old chap.
    , @Anonymous
    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as '61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    But no white minister could have gotten away with being as brazen as King was then or now. The churches would not have tolerated it. Indeed, Swaggart's failing is that he was doing it right in front of the church of a rival preacher, who he himself had had defrocked for sex offenses:



    Background

    Swaggart's exposure came as retaliation for an incident in 1986 when Swaggart exposed fellow Assemblies of God minister Marvin Gorman, who had been accused of having several affairs. Once exposed, Gorman was defrocked from the Assemblies of God, his ministry all but ended. As a retaliatory move, Gorman hired his son Randy and son-in-law Garland Bilbo to stake out the Travel Inn on Airline Highway in Baton Rouge. A camera with a telephoto lens was placed in the window of the motel's Room 12, and was draped with a black cloth. When Swaggart arrived, he reportedly went into Room 7. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo let the air out of the tires on Swaggart's vehicle. They called Marvin Gorman, whose church was located nearby. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo had taken photos of Swaggart outside Room 7 with Debra Murphree,[6][7] a local prostitute. Gorman arrived at the Travel Inn a short while later and asked Swaggart what he was doing there.

    According to Swaggart: The Unauthorized Biography of an American Evangelist, by Ann Rowe Seaman, Gorman secured a promise from Swaggart that he would publicly apologize to Gorman and start the process of Gorman's reinstatement to the Assemblies of God. Gorman offered to remain silent if Swaggart would state publicly that he lied about Gorman's affairs. Gorman waited almost a year, then hand-delivered a note to Swaggart informing him his time was up; Swaggart did not respond. On February 16, 1988, Gorman contacted James Hamil, one of the 13-man Executive Presbytery of the Assemblies of God, who called Raymond Carlson, the Assemblies Superintendent. Carlson summoned Hamill and Gorman to fly to Assemblies of God headquarters in Springfield, Missouri and arranged for an emergency meeting of the presbyters. He was shown photos of several men coming in and going out of Room 7 at the Travel Inn Motel in New Orleans. This was done to establish that the room was being used for prostitution. One of the men seen leaving Room 7 was Swaggart. The presbytery leadership of the Assemblies of God decided that Swaggart should be suspended from broadcasting his television program for three months.

     

    Swaggart, a man whose crowd-working capacities rival those of James Brown, Mick Jagger, and that guy with the funny mustache from Austria, is not especially known for his planning acumen, but there's no evidence he's especially stupid. The case for him wanting to be punished is plausible.
    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn't give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It's possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to
    "deal with" him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible "dixie cup" assassin-a disposable asset.

    Short of a Final Judgment Day on which the sins of all are revealed, we'll never know for sure. As in the deaths of the Kennedys, Marilyn Monroe, and indeed many others, the conspiracy theories are thick but everyone involved is now dead and the matter is legally otiose at this point.

    But what we do know is that the man we know as "Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King" was morally bankrupt, a sexual beast who hired and often beat white prostitutes with church funds, a willing tool of communist operatives, the holder of a doctorate obtained by fraud, and who was never legally named Martin Luther King.
  212. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.

    Ted Pappas, editor of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, has probably done more than any other person in documenting the dubiousness of MLK’s doctorate:
    Plagiarism and The Culture War : The Writings of Martin Luther King, Jr, and Other Prominent Americans https://www.amazon.com/dp/0873190459/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_uMf7Cb790DSMJ

  213. American culture is a culture of lies, and MLK is a phony hero, tailor-made to American specifications.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    He has his virtues and accomplishments. The trouble is, that was a moment in time and the salient figures in it had talents for just that moment, not for any other moment. (Or, perhaps, they were diverted from productive pursuits by the moment and its sequelae). Hosea Williams had given up a satisfactory career for political agitation and you could argue that Roy Wilkins (lapsed newspaper reporter) might have done something agreeable with his life outside those organizational folds. After 1964, Bayard Rustin had a passable job on the research staff of the AFL-CIO and after 1973 James Farmer had a teaching job for which he was passably qualified. You run down the list of luminaries (Julian Bond, Marion Barry, Charles McDew, James Forman, John Lewis, Stokeley Carmichael, Rap Brown, Vernon Jordan, Jesse Jackson, Ralph David Abernathy, Joseph Lowery, Floyd McKissick) and then you look at Coretta and three of King's four children (not his youngest, who has plugged along honestly) and you see a chronicle of wasted time (and patronage positions). Let's have another PBS documentary to buck up.
  214. @The Anti-Gnostic
    How did he get 1,472 pages out of the life of Obama? That's pretty obsessive.

    That includes the 400 pages of reference material (among which are 270 pages of notes and 36 pages of bibliography). The narrative runs to just shy of 1,100 pages.

    3.8%: Cold open about Chicago (in re a period of time he wasn’t living there).
    6.1%: Early life
    8.2%: College and brief private-sector employment
    12.1%: Alinskyite community organizing in Chicago
    12.2%: Law school & summer clerking
    7.8%: 1st book, academic employment, firm employment, marriage
    12.1%: Running for legislature, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, sitting in legislature.
    11.3%: Sitting in legislature, falling to Bobby Rush
    15.2%: Senate campaign
    6.5%: Congress (concludes with beginning of Pres. campaign)
    4.6%: Epilogue

    I’m wondering in the 164 pages devoted to his Senate campaign if Garrow managed to smoke out who kept feeding confidential paperwork on his opponents’ divorce proceedings to the Chicago media (and if Garrow got an explanation from figures in the media as to why the stuff wasn’t immediately returned unread).

    • Replies: @vinteuil

    I’m wondering in the 164 pages devoted to his Senate campaign if Garrow managed to smoke out who kept feeding confidential paperwork on his opponents’ divorce proceedings to the Chicago media (and if Garrow got an explanation from figures in the media as to why the stuff wasn’t immediately returned unread).
     
    Good question.

    Incidentally, though I guess you haven't actually read the book (or you wouldn't be wondering about this), you are able to offer us a detailed mathematical breakdown of its contents, down to the nearest tenth of one percent! Remarkable.
  215. Martin Lecher Kink Blvd.

  216. @JimDandy
    Possible problem with that: He presented as bi, and was often accompanied by women. Beards or not, who knows? Maybe he got drunk and cracked one over the head with an absinthe bottle.

    Yes, the Frenchies and wannabe Frenchies with their absinthe.

  217. @Lot
    There’s a Baldwin debate at Oxford Union that you will see lefties describe like the second coming of Lincoln or Cicero.

    I watched it, and he was just awful, style, content, everything. He just droned on and on.

    And yet the upper class Englishmen in the audience, born circa 1948, awarded him with massive applause.

    In other words, the Ta of his generation.

    Are you referring to Baldwin’s debate with Bill Buckley? If so, you have characterized Baldwin quite accurately.

    • Replies: @Lot
    Yeah. Sorry it was at Cambridge in ‘65, so the undergrads were born 1943-1947.

    Buckley wasn’t too impressive either.

    “In the end, the Cambridge Union Society took a vote on the proposition: “The American Dream is at the expense of the American negro.” The yays outpolled the nays 540-160.”

    It was the 1890-1930 birth cohorts that raised, educated and indoctrinated the young Cambridge men to believe this crap. Ethno-masochism and smug leftist superiority over the benighted southern rednecks has a long pedigree.
  218. @TontoBubbaGoldstein
    Think of how many U2 songs will need to be rewritten!!

    I want to run, I want to hide
    I want to tear down the walls that hold me inside
    I wanna reach out and touch the flame
    When the streets are renamed

    I want to feel sunlight on my face
    I see that dust cloud disappear without a trace
    I wanna take shelter from the poison rain
    When the streets are renamed, oh oh
    When the streets are renamed
    When the streets are renamed

    Early morning, April 4
    Shot rings out in the Memphis sky
    Free at last, they took your life
    They could not take your piece on the side

  219. @Anonymous
    The site martinlutherking.org had a treasure trove of MLK information in which Garrow was frequently quoted. But that site has been suppressed and like an idiot I didn't cache it or capture screen shots.

    The bottom line was that almost his entire dissertation was cribbed from other unattributed sources.

    He was an utter and complete phony who may well have been killed by his own communist handlers when they decided he was an asset dead and a liability alive. Unfortunately I know of no good site now that enumerates all the stuff he was doing any more: they appear to have been suppressed effectively.

    By 1968 MLK wasn’t that important anymore. The Memphis garbage worker strike was considered a big defeat. Then he was killed and became a martyr.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    He was still consequential. Trouble is, his skill set did not include a means of understanding problems most of the country was actually facing in real time. The most insightful person in his camarilla may have been Bayard Rustin, but Rustin never had much of a public profile and wasn't at all influential after 1964 or thereabouts. Look at Jesse Jackson. He had influence, but only a fuzzy understanding on a good day of what was wrong with the world.
  220. @Art Deco
    . King’s womanizing–like JFK’s–was known for years. A

    Known by whom?

    Known by whom?

    By the people who matter, old chap.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    You mean no one outside the FBI, King's entourage, Kennedy's entourage, and Adela Rogers St. John matters? Good to know.
  221. @Alec Leamas

    Known by whom?
     
    By the people who matter, old chap.

    You mean no one outside the FBI, King’s entourage, Kennedy’s entourage, and Adela Rogers St. John matters? Good to know.

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas
    I was referring to JFK.

    In which case, Hoover's FBI, the Rooskies, the Mob, the Rat Pack and the Press. Just not the American voting public.

  222. @Anon
    MLK's sexual indiscretions have been an open secret for decades.

    The British MSM isn't as PC, so this type of stuff is more mentionable over there.

    Jack Anderson went into some detail about King’s sexual transgressions in a column around 1969-70. And Anderson was widely read in those days. A history teacher (I was a college sophomore at the time) read the column in class. He was a liberal democrat, though not a hard-line leftist.

    This negative piece on MLK was not widely discussed at the time.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Jody Powell described Anderson as 'non-ideological'. His column in the Post was placed in the features section along with Ann Landers - juxtaposed to the comics pages and the astrology listings. I'm not sure it ever generated any news stories. I think Lester Kinsolving's column was usually similarly situated in most papers.
  223. @MikeatMikedotMike
    Constand is a lesbian and admitted as much:

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/bill-cosbys-prevailing-accuser-andrea-constand-lesbian-heres-matters-185127955.html

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.

    What vibe is that?

    • Replies: @Lurker
    Tribe vibe?
  224. @Art Deco
    You mean no one outside the FBI, King's entourage, Kennedy's entourage, and Adela Rogers St. John matters? Good to know.

    I was referring to JFK.

    In which case, Hoover’s FBI, the Rooskies, the Mob, the Rat Pack and the Press. Just not the American voting public.

  225. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Acilius
    Since King was directly confronting law enforcement agencies, state governments, and other powerful organizations and individuals in the name of an ideology that put the spotlight on the lawlessness of those in power, it's hard to imagine there was ever a time when he did not suspect that his conversations were being surreptitiously recorded for use against him. Certainly by 1964, the date of the most disturbing reports Garrow covers, he must have known that Hoover's FBI was watching him closely.

    So why would he go on talking and acting in this way? It goes beyond sheer arrogance or thoughtlessness; he must have had some kind of psychological compulsion, an overwhelming desire to be caught and punished, even if that meant taking his friends and his cause down with him. That in turn casts a stark light on his ideas. No longer is King just one more preacher who failed to live up to his lovely words of moral instruction. If the most famous American advocate of nonviolence as a way of life was a masochist with a drive to seek his own destruction and that of everyone who trusted him, he becomes a powerful argument against pacifism. What he presented as peace would simply be another form of violence.

    So why would he go on talking and acting in this way? It goes beyond sheer arrogance or thoughtlessness; he must have had some kind of psychological compulsion, an overwhelming desire to be caught and punished, even if that meant taking his friends and his cause down with him. That in turn casts a stark light on his ideas. No longer is King just one more preacher who failed to live up to his lovely words of moral instruction. If the most famous American advocate of nonviolence as a way of life was a masochist with a drive to seek his own destruction and that of everyone who trusted him, he becomes a powerful argument against pacifism. What he presented as peace would simply be another form of violence.

    You are overthinking this. Michael King (his real legal name) was a pretty typical negro of relatively pure blood. Not thinking of the future beyond the next night. Wanting to be punished MIGHT have been Swaggart’s issue, but not King’s. King’s was no future time orientation and being a tool of outside agitators and manipulators with little motivation besides a desire for adulation and pussy.

  226. @Dr. Robert Morgan
    American culture is a culture of lies, and MLK is a phony hero, tailor-made to American specifications.

    He has his virtues and accomplishments. The trouble is, that was a moment in time and the salient figures in it had talents for just that moment, not for any other moment. (Or, perhaps, they were diverted from productive pursuits by the moment and its sequelae). Hosea Williams had given up a satisfactory career for political agitation and you could argue that Roy Wilkins (lapsed newspaper reporter) might have done something agreeable with his life outside those organizational folds. After 1964, Bayard Rustin had a passable job on the research staff of the AFL-CIO and after 1973 James Farmer had a teaching job for which he was passably qualified. You run down the list of luminaries (Julian Bond, Marion Barry, Charles McDew, James Forman, John Lewis, Stokeley Carmichael, Rap Brown, Vernon Jordan, Jesse Jackson, Ralph David Abernathy, Joseph Lowery, Floyd McKissick) and then you look at Coretta and three of King’s four children (not his youngest, who has plugged along honestly) and you see a chronicle of wasted time (and patronage positions). Let’s have another PBS documentary to buck up.

  227. Jack D., 185, It’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s a conspiracy verdict, tested and affirmed to forensic standards. See for yourself.

    https://www.thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf

    And a matter of exhaustively documented fact:

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-plot-to-kill-martin-luther-king-survived-shooting-was-murdered-in-hospital-an-interview-with-william-pepper/5544005

    Ray didn’t need to be an Einstein cause he didn’t have anything to do except flounder around and get framed. Professional government CIA cutouts killed King.

    Malcolm X is an even clearer case. CIA whacked Malcolm X and his foreign interlocutors, Abdul Rahman Babu and Pio Pinto, in Africa. CIA did it because Malcolm was taking the US to the World Court with the help of African member states. CIA was fine with X as long as they could paint him as a violent radical. When he converted to law’norder and enforced jus cogens, that’s when CIA whacked him. CIA is still pumping out propaganda blaming their hits on internal dissension in black nationalist movements, but it’s all slogans for dumbshits. X and King were converging on the need to go over the government’s head to the world to enforce universal-jurisdiction law. That was what put them on Dick Ober’s CIA kill list.

    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    CIA whacked Malcolm X

    He was killed on the orders of Elijah Muhammed, with who he had actual bad blood.

    He was a purveyor of verbiage, a grotesque novelty, not a person of actual consequence.
    , @Art Deco
    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    There are surviving letters from Malcolm Little to friends which are surprisingly intimate and in which he offers some distress that he'd not been able to satisfy his wife. Don't think he was much of a horn dog.
  228. @David In TN
    By 1968 MLK wasn't that important anymore. The Memphis garbage worker strike was considered a big defeat. Then he was killed and became a martyr.

    He was still consequential. Trouble is, his skill set did not include a means of understanding problems most of the country was actually facing in real time. The most insightful person in his camarilla may have been Bayard Rustin, but Rustin never had much of a public profile and wasn’t at all influential after 1964 or thereabouts. Look at Jesse Jackson. He had influence, but only a fuzzy understanding on a good day of what was wrong with the world.

  229. @David In TN
    Jack Anderson went into some detail about King's sexual transgressions in a column around 1969-70. And Anderson was widely read in those days. A history teacher (I was a college sophomore at the time) read the column in class. He was a liberal democrat, though not a hard-line leftist.

    This negative piece on MLK was not widely discussed at the time.

    Jody Powell described Anderson as ‘non-ideological’. His column in the Post was placed in the features section along with Ann Landers – juxtaposed to the comics pages and the astrology listings. I’m not sure it ever generated any news stories. I think Lester Kinsolving’s column was usually similarly situated in most papers.

  230. MLK – now there was a KANGZ.

  231. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Simply Simon
    I believe Robert Byrd was taken very seriously by Republicans and Democrats. He was one of the longer serving senators and for many years chair of the Appropriations Committee. If a fellow senator wanted something appropriated for his district he had to pay obeisance to Mr Byrd. He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I'believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland. He was an expert on parliamentary rules and used that to his advantage many times during floor debate, In the long gone days when I watched Senate proceedings on C-Span Bryd was the picture of the well-groomed and manicured Southern politician dwelling at great length on obscure subjects and often reciting lengthy poems from memory. For an ex-Klansman the old boy did quite well.

    He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland.

    Gibson Guitar would have been happy to see that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson_Byrdland

  232. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Mason
    He may have fucked around a lot for a rev., but he had more boulevards named after him than any man in history and triggered as much reformation as the original protest man, Martin Luther.

    Any boulevard named after MLK is a dirty one:

  233. Lot says:
    @PV van der Byl
    Are you referring to Baldwin's debate with Bill Buckley? If so, you have characterized Baldwin quite accurately.

    Yeah. Sorry it was at Cambridge in ‘65, so the undergrads were born 1943-1947.

    Buckley wasn’t too impressive either.

    “In the end, the Cambridge Union Society took a vote on the proposition: “The American Dream is at the expense of the American negro.” The yays outpolled the nays 540-160.”

    It was the 1890-1930 birth cohorts that raised, educated and indoctrinated the young Cambridge men to believe this crap. Ethno-masochism and smug leftist superiority over the benighted southern rednecks has a long pedigree.

    • Replies: @vinteuil

    Buckley wasn’t too impressive either.
     
    He never was. Buckley's main strength as a debater was his bizarre accent, which did him no good in England.
  234. @Jonathan Mason
    He may have fucked around a lot for a rev., but he had more boulevards named after him than any man in history and triggered as much reformation as the original protest man, Martin Luther.

  235. @Jack D
    Moses's childhood is one of the less unbelievable parts of his story - at least he wasn't raised by wolves. However, later on there are certainly supernatural elements involving the parting of the Red Sea, the Burning Bush and so on. Adam and Eve are better examples of virgin birth but I guess they are needed in order to solve the "chicken or egg" issue in the story line. But after that I don't think there are any more stories of virgin birth in the Jewish scriptures. However, Sarah giving birth at age 90 is almost as miraculous (read unbelievable) as a virgin birth. The idea of an angel appearing in order to announce some coming miraculous event was also pretty common in the Jewish scriptures.

    The virgin birth story appears only in the Gospels of "Matthew" and "Luke", which were not written by Matthew and Luke but maybe 80 to 100 years after the death of Jesus when all eyewitnesses to his birth would have been dead. As you say, it was pretty common to boost your favorite guru's street cred by pronouncing that he was the product of virgin birth and/or had pulled off various miracles. Just being a preacher or a wise man was not enough - if the gods favored your man, he should be able to show some sort of superpower to show that he was no ordinary mortal.

    You might want to delve into Paul’s use of παραδίδωμι before discounting the veracity of oral tradition within the early Church.

  236. @Art Deco
    There haven't been any assassinations of note in nearly forty years, the attack on Gabrielle Giffords excepted. Members of Congress and federal trial judges do not have personal security details.

    In re the attempts on Reagan and Ford, Michael Kinsley suggested that American officials go to school with their British and Israeli counterparts and eliminate the PR bally-hoo which requires all an officials' movements be broadcast in advance. Kinsley also noted that the security apparatus as is is so large and obtrusive that it telegraphs its presence. That doesn't say much about 'our institutions'. It does say something about the mental habits of our politicians and about the Secret Service (which has manifest performance problems).

    In re MLK, again, private citizens seldom have security details. It's bloody expensive. In re RFK, it wasn't done prior to 1968 to provide security details to presidential candidates and they weren't needed. Prior to 1965, former Presidents had no security detail. Mrs. Kennedy lost her detail when she remarried.

    Both George Wallace and John Kennedy had disregarded advice and protocol that day. Not seeing how 'institutions' bear responsibility for that.

    William Manchester, in his book The Death of a President, made an astute observation. The shot hit JFK below the throat. The driver of the Presidential car was trained to upon hearing a shot, to hit the accelerator and MOVE.

    However, the driver slowed down and looked behind him, as complete an act of utter stupidity as can be imagined. Had he done what he was trained to do, JFK probably would have survived the first bullet that hit him and likely wouldn’t have been hit again.

    Manchester was angry at the Secret Service driver and always said Oswald was the killer and acted alone. Manchester did follow the party line in not taking Oswald’s Marxism-Communism seriously.

    RFK during his 1968 run insisted on riding around in an open convertible and plunging into crowds. He refused to employ professional bodyguards. The Secret Service didn’t give protection to all candidates until after RFK’s assassination.

    His “protection” the night he was shot was a washed-up ex-FBI agent/family retainer, Rosey Grier, and Rafer Johnson. They were trailing behind RFK instead of being in front, alongside, and on the lookout.

    • Replies: @Prof. Woland
    A very close friend of mine's family are camera buffs and they have an 8mm tape of JFK they took of him riding around in a Lincoln convertible. I believe the picture was shot in Hawaii where they lived in the early 60's. Kennedy was in the back seat on the right side of the car as it made a left turn and he was so close they could have reached out and slapped him. I realized when I saw that he really was not very careful and I am not surprised that someone whacked him. Not unlike Archduke Ferdinand.
  237. @Ober's Coonhound
    Jack D., 185, It's not a conspiracy theory, it's a conspiracy verdict, tested and affirmed to forensic standards. See for yourself.

    https://www.thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf

    And a matter of exhaustively documented fact:

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-plot-to-kill-martin-luther-king-survived-shooting-was-murdered-in-hospital-an-interview-with-william-pepper/5544005

    Ray didn't need to be an Einstein cause he didn't have anything to do except flounder around and get framed. Professional government CIA cutouts killed King.

    Malcolm X is an even clearer case. CIA whacked Malcolm X and his foreign interlocutors, Abdul Rahman Babu and Pio Pinto, in Africa. CIA did it because Malcolm was taking the US to the World Court with the help of African member states. CIA was fine with X as long as they could paint him as a violent radical. When he converted to law'norder and enforced jus cogens, that's when CIA whacked him. CIA is still pumping out propaganda blaming their hits on internal dissension in black nationalist movements, but it's all slogans for dumbshits. X and King were converging on the need to go over the government's head to the world to enforce universal-jurisdiction law. That was what put them on Dick Ober's CIA kill list.

    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    CIA whacked Malcolm X

    He was killed on the orders of Elijah Muhammed, with who he had actual bad blood.

    He was a purveyor of verbiage, a grotesque novelty, not a person of actual consequence.

    • Agree: David In TN
  238. @Ober's Coonhound
    Jack D., 185, It's not a conspiracy theory, it's a conspiracy verdict, tested and affirmed to forensic standards. See for yourself.

    https://www.thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf

    And a matter of exhaustively documented fact:

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-plot-to-kill-martin-luther-king-survived-shooting-was-murdered-in-hospital-an-interview-with-william-pepper/5544005

    Ray didn't need to be an Einstein cause he didn't have anything to do except flounder around and get framed. Professional government CIA cutouts killed King.

    Malcolm X is an even clearer case. CIA whacked Malcolm X and his foreign interlocutors, Abdul Rahman Babu and Pio Pinto, in Africa. CIA did it because Malcolm was taking the US to the World Court with the help of African member states. CIA was fine with X as long as they could paint him as a violent radical. When he converted to law'norder and enforced jus cogens, that's when CIA whacked him. CIA is still pumping out propaganda blaming their hits on internal dissension in black nationalist movements, but it's all slogans for dumbshits. X and King were converging on the need to go over the government's head to the world to enforce universal-jurisdiction law. That was what put them on Dick Ober's CIA kill list.

    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    There are surviving letters from Malcolm Little to friends which are surprisingly intimate and in which he offers some distress that he’d not been able to satisfy his wife. Don’t think he was much of a horn dog.

    • Replies: @Corn
    Maybe he was too busy touring and lecturing to put the wood to Mrs. X. Or maybe he’d rather satisfy the guys. It’s long been rumored during his younger criminal days he dabbled in prostitution and hustling. IIRC those stories have never been conclusively proven but they’ve never been conclusively debunked either.
  239. @L Woods
    DR3 has never and will never work.

    Tis what it is–white liberals are patronizing racists.

  240. Anonymous[334] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    Some interesting details:

    https://twitter.com/jamesmacm/status/1132596607021703169

    -- The Guardian spiked the story at the last minute: SJWs pressuring from below?

    -- The Atlantic and the Washington Post chickened out.

    -- An unnamed web magazine "whose raison d'etre is to fight for free speech" wouldn't print it. Quillette*?

    -- The FBI summaries came from among 19,000 documents released by Donald Trump in 2018 relating to the Kennedy assasination.

    -- The law requiring the release of such documents was passed in the wake of Oliver Stone's freaky conspiracy movie JFK.

    -- The FBI just let a rape and other shit happen to protect sources and methods.

    -- Eight percent of the membership of the U.S. Communist Party were FBI informants.

    *"Quillette is a platform for free thought. We respect ideas, even dangerous ones. We also believe that free expression and the free exchange of ideas help human societies flourish and progress. Quillette aims to provide a platform for this exchange."

    — The FBI summaries came from among 19,000 documents released by Donald Trump in 2018 relating to the Kennedy assasination.

    4D chess as they say

  241. @Paleo Liberal
    There were other reasons why the statues of Robert E Lee went up and stayed up in the post Civil War era, until recent times.

    The South has had a strong military tradition since colonial times. The Lee Family was a big part of that tradition.

    In the 100 years following Reconstruction, the US was involved in Indian wars, the Spanish American War, two World Wars, adventures in various third world nations, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

    It is not clear that a divided nation would have done as well in those wars. The US couldn’t say “F U crackers “ and expected to put together a viable army.

    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.

    These days our wars are for lower stakes, fought by a volunteer army. We no longer have a draft. We don’t worry so much about people whose ancestors were on opposite sides of the Great Unpleasantness having to depend on each other in life or death situations. It still happens, but we don’t worry about it.

    There was a general mobilization during the period running from 1917 to 1920 and from 1940 to 1946. We had a roughly similar situation during the period running from 1950 to 1954. You had throughout the 19th c what amounted to counter-insurgency operations against the Indians and you had from 1898 and 1935 a number of military engagements abroad, but these were all conducted with a volunteer military encompassing modest shares of the country’s domestic product (< 2%).

  242. Anonymous[356] • Disclaimer says:

    Is anyone concerned about big government taping the hotel activites of MLK (or anyone else), or do Americans show less interest than Orwell’s country for another reason? Except when it comes to abortion, most Americans seem oblivious to the most egregious types of civil liberties violations. Back in the Eighties, the ACLU was concerned with this sort of thing, not with fostering mass-scale, welfare-assisted immigration.

    They were concerned with the Bill of Rights and its protection of citizens’ individual liberties.

    Given that MLK’s DNA Dynasty makes sure that people can’t use historical photos of the civil rights leader without paying them their due, you have to wonder whether the legal sensibilities of his heirs will be energized by something like video tapes of their relative’s most intimate moments, put out there for the world to gawk at like a freak show. Will they demand 4th Amendment privacy rights or money in return for the use of the images?

    • Replies: @Corn
    “Is anyone concerned about big government taping the hotel activites of MLK (or anyone else), or do Americans show less interest than Orwell’s country for another reason? Except when it comes to abortion, most Americans seem oblivious to the most egregious types of civil liberties violations. Back in the Eighties, the ACLU was concerned with this sort of thing, not with fostering mass-scale, welfare-assisted immigration.
    They were concerned with the Bill of Rights and its protection of citizens’ individual liberties.”

    True. When I was a kid in the 80s the ACLU always seemed to get in the papers for suing small towns over nativity displays in the town park Separation of church and state don’tcha know. I always thought the ACLU were petulant buzzkills.

    But those are the good old days compared to the ACLU of the 2010s, which is trying to establish immigration as a right and pretends the Second Amendment doesn’t exist.
  243. Art Deco 237, you need to bone up on John Ali, world’s most blindingly obvious agent provocateur. Ober’s M.O. at CIA was to seed Wisner’s Mighty Wurlitzer with fabricated rumors and news of dissension, which still fools people to this day, poster boy.

    Your heartfelt poesy on X trips off the tongue but it doesn’t actually prove anything, or even mean anything. The prospect of X’s verbiage in an ICJ docket triggered a CIA panic attack of 2 1/2 coups d’état and about ten murders, including white girl Viola Liuzzo. X was riding the wave of the Bandung Conference home to America, and CIA was wetting their pants in abject fear. The inconsequential consequences set in with the customary international law of torture, aggression, and noninterference, US CAT and ICCPR accession, state responsibility, and international criminal law, and they haven’t climaxed yet. You will have noticed that the USA’s more dickless every day. That’s cause black guys still use Malcolm’s brainstorm.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    You need to learn inductive reasoning, and to quit pestering normal people.
  244. @Simply Simon
    I believe Robert Byrd was taken very seriously by Republicans and Democrats. He was one of the longer serving senators and for many years chair of the Appropriations Committee. If a fellow senator wanted something appropriated for his district he had to pay obeisance to Mr Byrd. He returned so much federal largess to his home state of West Virginia I'believe he could have had the name changed to something like Byrdland. He was an expert on parliamentary rules and used that to his advantage many times during floor debate, In the long gone days when I watched Senate proceedings on C-Span Bryd was the picture of the well-groomed and manicured Southern politician dwelling at great length on obscure subjects and often reciting lengthy poems from memory. For an ex-Klansman the old boy did quite well.

    My impression is that mid-Century southern states tended to be pretty adept at identifying the most gifted legislators of each generation and electing them young to Congress and then over and over, where they built up huge seniority and brought home lots of bacon: Byrd, Thurmond, Russell, etc.

    Perhaps this was due to Jim Crow southern states disenfranchising a lot of poor whites, so that the electorates were pretty elite. If the state bar society, say, felt that this young man was The Guy to represent our state in Washington, that message tended to get out to eligible voters.

    • Agree: Lot
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Poll taxes were eliminated in Georgia in 1945, and some whites were dispensed for paying them prior to that. (https://www.todayingeorgiahistory.org/content/poll-tax-abolished). They were eliminated in South Carolina in 1952, before Thurmond was elected to Congress (https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/political-science-and-government/political-science-terms-and-concepts/poll-tax). It's not clear if you're referring to Robert Byrd or Harry Byrd. West Virginia had no poll tax at any time during Robert Byrd's career. Virginia's poll tax was fixed at $1.50 per year in 1904. (https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/poll_tax). As of 1932, $1.50 amounted to 0.4% of nominal personal income per capita. A contextually similar sum today would be $68. I suspect the vast majority of people today couldn't be bothered with voting if it would cost them $68 a year, but that's not because they absolutely could not spare the cash.

    The share of the resident population in Virginia, Georgia, and South Carolina who cast ballots in 1952 (15-19%) was a good deal lower than the share nationally (39%), but at that point you can't attribute the difference to poll taxes.
    , @Paleo Liberal
    It wasn’t necessarily the state bar.

    In the town in Arkansas where I grew up there was a very influential newspaper publisher named Roberta Fulbright. She had a running feud of sorts with some Democratic Party leaders. At one point she used her considerable influence to get her son, J. William Fulbright elected to the senate.

    Fulbright spent 30 years in the senate, all as the state’s junior senator. Almost all of his primary victories were closely contested. He finally lost a primary in 1974 to Dale Bumpers, who was then governor of Arkansas. Political scientist Diane Blair said Bumpers had been the best governor Arkansas ever bad. Considering that Ms. Blair and her second husband Jim Blair were very close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton, that was a rather remarkable statement.
  245. @Jack D
    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary - it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam's Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK's chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.

    and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia

    According to wikipedia, the oldest complete surviving Talmud was written in 1289 AD in Rome, Italy and published in Constantinople.

    I suppose the Islamic Golden Age libraries in Iraq have yet to be discovered, or that it’s an unrealistic expectation to find a Babylonian Talmud in Babylon.

    As an added twist, wikipedia states: “After the publication of the Bomberg edition of the Jerusalem Talmud [1523] the Leiden Talmud was lost for around three hundred years. It was only to be rediscovered in the mid nineteenth century in the Library of the city of Leiden”

  246. @Federalist
    Isn't all that definitive? What's that supposed to mean? Supposedly, King had 40 to 45 affairs and laughed while a pastor friend raped a parishioner. What difference does it make whether the writer heard the tapes or read FBI agents' notes of the tapes?

    The 40-45 “affairs” number is a significant undercount based on King’s own words. Unless they are only counting women he had ongoing relations with not those he only saw once. I think Garrow is telling a fib about being shocked by these reports. He is the one who reported the “I’m on the road 25-27 nights a month, fornicating* is a form of anxiety reduction for me” quote. None of this is surprise to people who have seriously read about King’s life, to the masses who blindly believe the sainthood narrative they here in school, it might be though.

  247. @Art Deco
    As for Black and White people collectively, the complete ways of life of each group are so hostile to each other,

    Blacks have long had more disorganized domestic lives than the rest of the population, and have a lower propensity to save money. Keep in mind, though, that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965. You have a critical mass of lumpenproletarian hoods who make most black neighborhoods a trial to live in, but the people experiencing the trial are ordinary wage-earners. The lifeways of a comfortable majority aren't antagonistic. The problem is in the tail of the bell curve.

    that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965

    Does murder/rape per 100k count towards disorganization? Do whites even come to a fraction of 1965 black levels?

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    I was referring to family formation.


    Not sure what the perpetration rates among blacks were in 1965. In generally, crime rates were increasing rapidly at that time, but I'm not sure if that increase was evenly distributed accross all racial categories.
  248. @ScarletNumber
    Just think of how many streets will have to be renamed...

    They won’t be.

  249. @Paleo Liberal
    While it is fashionable among some of the alt-right to denigrate George Washington Carver, his achievements were quite remarkable. He achieved greatness in both agricultural science and science education. My training is in chemistry, and his work in agricultural chemistry is considered to be the finest of his era.

    I agree that Carver was wise enough to stay in areas for which he had expertise. He was able to accomplish quite a bit by recognizing the reality of his time and doing what he could to improve the lot of the more intelligent blacks within the limits of society.

    That being said, Carver expanded what these limits were.

    I’ve read enough about his early history to understand why he thought this way. His mother was purchased by Moses Carver, who was against slavery but needed a servant. George, his mother, and his brother were all kidnapped by folks who did not appreciate Moses’ pro-Union stance. Moses Carver only found baby George, and traded his best horse for the young boy. Moses raised him as a son.

    George Carver’s education was facilitated by a Nice White Lady who took in George at a boarding school.

    At one point there were two George Carvers living in the same town; one white and one black. Black George Carver added the middle name Washington to avoid the difficulties that ensued. It would not be seemly for the White George to make the concession, especially since Black George was the newcomer.

    To be blunt, Carver learned from an early age that he could succeed in life with the aid of Nice White People, and that antagonizing the meaner white folks could have horrible consequences. Confrontation could’ve alienated his allies and raised the ire of potential enemies.

    George Washington Carver was some sort of mentor to the teenage Henry Wallace, the future geneticist and Vice President during WWII.

    Wallace was a very talented man.

  250. @Jack D
    99.9% of the Talmud has nothing to do with Jesus or Mary - it concerns itself with really important questions such as whether one may eat an egg that was laid on the Sabbath (and every other conceivable subject of concern to a 5th century Jew living in Babylonia).

    Since it was written in a time and place where Christianity was not yet ascendant, in a few isolated places it has some politically incorrect gossip about some people who may or may not be Jesus and Mary, such as whether she was really a virgin or maybe she was messin' around with them Roman soldiers. To someone who is not a devout Christian believer, this strikes me as a fair speculation and Occam's Butterknife would come down on the side of the Roman soldier. There have been lots and lots of war babies throughout history and up to the present day, but very few documented God babies.

    Of course later on once the Church had the upper hand they did not appreciate these questions any more than our current rulers want to discuss MLK's chastity or lack thereof. Denouncing the Talmud was certainly fashionable about say 1400 but some alt.righters are a little late to the party, I guess.

    Talmud also deals with some hypothetically very prosaic issues, such as :

    “With God’s help, to His Honor, my dear Rabbi,

    Would it be OU, OK, Kof-K, and Star-K certified if I hogtie this neighbor-guy (goy?) in his own house, and then just leave and fuggedaboutit for a couple of weeks before I come back to check on him?

    I am asking for a friend.”

    THE ANSWER:

    http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_77.html#E85

    • Replies: @Jack D
    1st of all it says nothing about goyim - presumably they are talking about fellow Jews. 2nd, these are typical law school type hypotheticals to test the limits of what we call "proximate cause" in the common law. When philosophers discuss the "trolley problem" they aren't making plans to tie their neighbors to the railroad tracks either.

    There was one guy in my law school class who had been to yeshiva and I had the feeling that law school was a piece of cake for him because he had been batting around these kind of hypotheticals since childhood.
  251. This stuff is at least ten years old. I remember it, to include Garrow as the source, from years ago. And even then it wasn’t particularly news to people in the black/civil-rights communities.

  252. “Slavery was America’s original sin”

    And not the shoahing of the native Americans?

    And what the hell does that even mean, anyway?

  253. @Jake
    The 'civil rights' movement was in origin, back to Abolitionism and the Emancipation Proclamation and Reconstruction, about the Yank WASP Elites acting to break and subdue the whites they most feared and hated. Jews took that culture war to a whole new level, starting slowly with the 1920s, and exploding in 1948.

    The 1950s-60s civil rights movement was Cultural Marxism before anybody guessed at the slightly new concept, much less named it.

    Quite right, Jake. Mel Bradford and Gene Genovese were on to them before anyone else. I think McPherson’s Battle Cry of Freedom, which institutionalized the imperial myth, marked a real turning point in how the war could be discussed.

    • Replies: @stillCARealist
    So should segregation have been left in place? Should some other approach have been used to end it?

    I find it very frustrating that people comment on here about how bad all these decisions have been but offer no counterpoint to what was clearly unequal treatment. You have a sign on a public bus that says, "Colored to the rear", which my sister saw, illegal and unenforced, in SC in 1981, and you think it won't piss people off to the point of action?

    Yes, the civil rights movement was full of commies and criminals, but what were the good people doing to end segregation, and would that have worked? And here we thought MLK's non-violent tactics were the correct ones.
  254. @Jack D
    Of course no attack on MLK's sacred memory by evil white racists is possible, but you are discounting an attack from the Left. To the Woke, MLK is an old fashioned figure who died before they were born. His advocacy of non-violence and a future where skin color would have no importance is NOT what Antifa and BLM subscribe to. Not all all. All those MLK Boulevards should be renamed Malcolm X Boulevard in their view.

    That’s right. Because after all MLK was a True Conservative. Like Harriet Tubman and probably Nat Turner soon enough. David French will explain and instapundit will link.

  255. @bucky
    Hopefully this can be an impetus to remove MLK day. Worst holiday ever.

    Growing up in a small Southern town, the local hung a sign stating they were closed to honor Robert E Lee. Continued doing so for some years. This is a place where a good percentage of country folk have Confederate flag license plates. And guess what? We all get along just fine.

  256. @Ober's Coonhound
    Art Deco 237, you need to bone up on John Ali, world's most blindingly obvious agent provocateur. Ober's M.O. at CIA was to seed Wisner's Mighty Wurlitzer with fabricated rumors and news of dissension, which still fools people to this day, poster boy.

    Your heartfelt poesy on X trips off the tongue but it doesn't actually prove anything, or even mean anything. The prospect of X's verbiage in an ICJ docket triggered a CIA panic attack of 2 1/2 coups d'état and about ten murders, including white girl Viola Liuzzo. X was riding the wave of the Bandung Conference home to America, and CIA was wetting their pants in abject fear. The inconsequential consequences set in with the customary international law of torture, aggression, and noninterference, US CAT and ICCPR accession, state responsibility, and international criminal law, and they haven't climaxed yet. You will have noticed that the USA's more dickless every day. That's cause black guys still use Malcolm's brainstorm.

    You need to learn inductive reasoning, and to quit pestering normal people.

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Have you gone mad? Pestering normal people is half the purpose of the Internet!

    The other half is pestering fellow crazy people.
  257. @BB753
    Dunno. Colby's in jail and Weinstein seems to be able to walk away free.

    If you mean Cosby, he was ostracized from the black community in May 2004 for his remarks at an NAACP awards ceremony

    But these people, the ones up here in the balcony fought so hard. Looking at the incarcerated, these are not political criminals. These are people going around stealing Coca-Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! And then we all run out and are outraged, ‘The cops shouldn’t have shot him.’ What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand? I wanted a piece of pound cake just as bad as anybody else, and I looked at it and I had no money. And something called parenting said, ‘If you get caught with it you’re going to embarrass your mother.’ Not ‘You’re going to get your butt kicked.’ No. ‘You’re going to embarrass your family.’

    We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don’t know a damned thing about Africa. With names like Shaniqua, Shaligua, Mohammed and all that crap and all of them are in jail.

    Therefore, they didn’t care if Cosby went to jail.

    • Agree: BB753
    • Replies: @Jack Hanson
    The judge in Cosby's case specifically stated he unsealed the records relating to Cosby's past behaviors due to his comments regarding black dysfunction in the past.
  258. @Art Deco
    You need to learn inductive reasoning, and to quit pestering normal people.

    Have you gone mad? Pestering normal people is half the purpose of the Internet!

    The other half is pestering fellow crazy people.

  259. @Steve Sailer
    My impression is that mid-Century southern states tended to be pretty adept at identifying the most gifted legislators of each generation and electing them young to Congress and then over and over, where they built up huge seniority and brought home lots of bacon: Byrd, Thurmond, Russell, etc.

    Perhaps this was due to Jim Crow southern states disenfranchising a lot of poor whites, so that the electorates were pretty elite. If the state bar society, say, felt that this young man was The Guy to represent our state in Washington, that message tended to get out to eligible voters.

    Poll taxes were eliminated in Georgia in 1945, and some whites were dispensed for paying them prior to that. (https://www.todayingeorgiahistory.org/content/poll-tax-abolished). They were eliminated in South Carolina in 1952, before Thurmond was elected to Congress (https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/political-science-and-government/political-science-terms-and-concepts/poll-tax). It’s not clear if you’re referring to Robert Byrd or Harry Byrd. West Virginia had no poll tax at any time during Robert Byrd’s career. Virginia’s poll tax was fixed at $1.50 per year in 1904. (https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/poll_tax). As of 1932, $1.50 amounted to 0.4% of nominal personal income per capita. A contextually similar sum today would be $68. I suspect the vast majority of people today couldn’t be bothered with voting if it would cost them $68 a year, but that’s not because they absolutely could not spare the cash.

    The share of the resident population in Virginia, Georgia, and South Carolina who cast ballots in 1952 (15-19%) was a good deal lower than the share nationally (39%), but at that point you can’t attribute the difference to poll taxes.

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber

    I suspect the vast majority of people today couldn’t be bothered with voting if it would cost them $68 a year, but that’s not because they absolutely could not spare the cash.
     
    I wonder if there were any laws about having others pay the poll tax for you. I know plenty of people who wouldn't pay $68 to vote, but would have their hand out.
  260. @Hippopotamusdrome


    that the metrics of the non-hispanic white population in our time indicate more disorganization than the black population was suffering in 1965

     

    Does murder/rape per 100k count towards disorganization? Do whites even come to a fraction of 1965 black levels?

    I was referring to family formation.

    Not sure what the perpetration rates among blacks were in 1965. In generally, crime rates were increasing rapidly at that time, but I’m not sure if that increase was evenly distributed accross all racial categories.

  261. @David In TN
    William Manchester, in his book The Death of a President, made an astute observation. The shot hit JFK below the throat. The driver of the Presidential car was trained to upon hearing a shot, to hit the accelerator and MOVE.

    However, the driver slowed down and looked behind him, as complete an act of utter stupidity as can be imagined. Had he done what he was trained to do, JFK probably would have survived the first bullet that hit him and likely wouldn't have been hit again.

    Manchester was angry at the Secret Service driver and always said Oswald was the killer and acted alone. Manchester did follow the party line in not taking Oswald's Marxism-Communism seriously.

    RFK during his 1968 run insisted on riding around in an open convertible and plunging into crowds. He refused to employ professional bodyguards. The Secret Service didn't give protection to all candidates until after RFK's assassination.

    His "protection" the night he was shot was a washed-up ex-FBI agent/family retainer, Rosey Grier, and Rafer Johnson. They were trailing behind RFK instead of being in front, alongside, and on the lookout.

    A very close friend of mine’s family are camera buffs and they have an 8mm tape of JFK they took of him riding around in a Lincoln convertible. I believe the picture was shot in Hawaii where they lived in the early 60’s. Kennedy was in the back seat on the right side of the car as it made a left turn and he was so close they could have reached out and slapped him. I realized when I saw that he really was not very careful and I am not surprised that someone whacked him. Not unlike Archduke Ferdinand.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    That would be film, not tape.
  262. @Jim Don Bob

    She also gives off another distinct vibe, IYKWIM.
     
    What vibe is that?

    Tribe vibe?

  263. @ATBOTL
    The boomer conservatives on FreeRepublic mostly don't believe these allegations, don't care and don't want to hear about it:

    http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3752500/posts

    The boomer conservatives on FreeRepublic mostly don’t believe these allegations, don’t care and don’t want to hear about it:

    I’m shocked! Free Republic is still going?

    I think it was 20 years last month that I logged out for good. Except for one visit in 2000, to defend our own Steve. For which I was banned.

    • Replies: @ATBOTL
    Yeah, it's still going. Those types of people are still probably the majority of conservatives in this country. They are certainly the large majority of boomer aged conservatives. Tell us more about what happened. What was the context in which you were defending Steve and what did those clowns say when they banned you?
  264. Steve Sailer: “And then they came for MLK…”

    I’m sure they did, over and over and over again. He’s an American Dream, the perfect combination of “muh dik” negro and the ability to talk like a white man without lapsing into ebonics. It should come as no surprise that the fact that he has been exposed as a complete fraud only makes him more attractive to the society of liars called the USA. If he didn’t exist it would have been necessary for them to invent him.

    Art Deco: “He has his virtues and accomplishments. ”

    The same could be said of anyone. But let’s give him his due. The society of liars wouldn’t have memorialized just anyone with a statue 30 feet tall. He was a special negro with a unique combination of talents and a gift for plagiarism that earned him a doctorate from a Bible college; one that a majority of whites, in their Christianized culture, love to kneel before.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    I’m sure they did, over and over and over again. He’s an American Dream, the perfect combination of “muh dik” negro and the ability to talk like a white man without lapsing into ebonics.

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.
  265. @BenKenobi
    Whiskey, are you saying that the negro is either at your feet or at your throat?

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat

    Also, what kind of whiskey are you?

    my guess: Johnny Walker Blue, neat

    I was going to say Ice Hole, but that’s schnapps.

    Revel Stoke, perhaps? Nah, our whisk[e]y comes in but one flavo[u]r.

  266. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art Deco
    . King’s womanizing–like JFK’s–was known for years. A

    Known by whom?

    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as ’61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    But no white minister could have gotten away with being as brazen as King was then or now. The churches would not have tolerated it. Indeed, Swaggart’s failing is that he was doing it right in front of the church of a rival preacher, who he himself had had defrocked for sex offenses:

    Background

    Swaggart’s exposure came as retaliation for an incident in 1986 when Swaggart exposed fellow Assemblies of God minister Marvin Gorman, who had been accused of having several affairs. Once exposed, Gorman was defrocked from the Assemblies of God, his ministry all but ended. As a retaliatory move, Gorman hired his son Randy and son-in-law Garland Bilbo to stake out the Travel Inn on Airline Highway in Baton Rouge. A camera with a telephoto lens was placed in the window of the motel’s Room 12, and was draped with a black cloth. When Swaggart arrived, he reportedly went into Room 7. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo let the air out of the tires on Swaggart’s vehicle. They called Marvin Gorman, whose church was located nearby. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo had taken photos of Swaggart outside Room 7 with Debra Murphree,[6][7] a local prostitute. Gorman arrived at the Travel Inn a short while later and asked Swaggart what he was doing there.

    According to Swaggart: The Unauthorized Biography of an American Evangelist, by Ann Rowe Seaman, Gorman secured a promise from Swaggart that he would publicly apologize to Gorman and start the process of Gorman’s reinstatement to the Assemblies of God. Gorman offered to remain silent if Swaggart would state publicly that he lied about Gorman’s affairs. Gorman waited almost a year, then hand-delivered a note to Swaggart informing him his time was up; Swaggart did not respond. On February 16, 1988, Gorman contacted James Hamil, one of the 13-man Executive Presbytery of the Assemblies of God, who called Raymond Carlson, the Assemblies Superintendent. Carlson summoned Hamill and Gorman to fly to Assemblies of God headquarters in Springfield, Missouri and arranged for an emergency meeting of the presbyters. He was shown photos of several men coming in and going out of Room 7 at the Travel Inn Motel in New Orleans. This was done to establish that the room was being used for prostitution. One of the men seen leaving Room 7 was Swaggart. The presbytery leadership of the Assemblies of God decided that Swaggart should be suspended from broadcasting his television program for three months.

    Swaggart, a man whose crowd-working capacities rival those of James Brown, Mick Jagger, and that guy with the funny mustache from Austria, is not especially known for his planning acumen, but there’s no evidence he’s especially stupid. The case for him wanting to be punished is plausible.
    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn’t give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It’s possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to
    “deal with” him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible “dixie cup” assassin-a disposable asset.

    Short of a Final Judgment Day on which the sins of all are revealed, we’ll never know for sure. As in the deaths of the Kennedys, Marilyn Monroe, and indeed many others, the conspiracy theories are thick but everyone involved is now dead and the matter is legally otiose at this point.

    But what we do know is that the man we know as “Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King” was morally bankrupt, a sexual beast who hired and often beat white prostitutes with church funds, a willing tool of communist operatives, the holder of a doctorate obtained by fraud, and who was never legally named Martin Luther King.

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn’t give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It’s possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to “deal with” him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible “dixie cup” assassin-a disposable asset.
     
    I think this works only if you assume that the deep state preferred the black radicals to MLK because they were self-discrediting and cast black liberation and civil rights movements in an unacceptable light.

    On the other hand, if you let King know that you know what you know, he's owned and can't stray into more radical approaches.
    , @Art Deco
    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    Who are you talking about here? King? No it wasn't.


    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as ’61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    No, it wasn't generally known until 1975. There were people on the White House staff who didn't know. Some reporters have indicated they were familiar with what was going on (e.g. Adela Rogers St. John).
  267. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Prof. Woland
    A very close friend of mine's family are camera buffs and they have an 8mm tape of JFK they took of him riding around in a Lincoln convertible. I believe the picture was shot in Hawaii where they lived in the early 60's. Kennedy was in the back seat on the right side of the car as it made a left turn and he was so close they could have reached out and slapped him. I realized when I saw that he really was not very careful and I am not surprised that someone whacked him. Not unlike Archduke Ferdinand.

    That would be film, not tape.

  268. All this is only riveting if one has a particularly high opinion of King in the first place. Otherwise, any revelations are going to be a bit like discovering that dogs lick their private parts and eat crumbs off the floor.

  269. @ScarletNumber
    If you mean Cosby, he was ostracized from the black community in May 2004 for his remarks at an NAACP awards ceremony

    But these people, the ones up here in the balcony fought so hard. Looking at the incarcerated, these are not political criminals. These are people going around stealing Coca-Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! And then we all run out and are outraged, 'The cops shouldn't have shot him.' What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand? I wanted a piece of pound cake just as bad as anybody else, and I looked at it and I had no money. And something called parenting said, 'If you get caught with it you're going to embarrass your mother.' Not 'You're going to get your butt kicked.' No. 'You're going to embarrass your family.'
     

    We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don't know a damned thing about Africa. With names like Shaniqua, Shaligua, Mohammed and all that crap and all of them are in jail.
     
    Therefore, they didn't care if Cosby went to jail.

    The judge in Cosby’s case specifically stated he unsealed the records relating to Cosby’s past behaviors due to his comments regarding black dysfunction in the past.

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas

    The judge in Cosby’s case specifically stated he unsealed the records relating to Cosby’s past behaviors due to his comments regarding black dysfunction in the past.
     
    That was a different Federal Judge from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from the one who presided over his criminal trials (Court of Common Pleas in Montgomery County).

    Still, I thought it was pretty outrageous.

    Additionally, the Common Pleas Judge presided over a pretrial hearing at which the District Attorney from the original investigation, Bruce Castor, testified that he had indeed made an agreement with Cosby's attorneys not to prosecute if Cosby waived his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in a subsequent civil case in which the standard of proof is much lower. The civil case is the one in which Cosby gave deposition testimony that was later used against him in the recent criminal trials.
  270. A lot of you in this thread are underestimating the strength of the MLK myth outside the fenced boundary of iSteve.com.

  271. @Art Deco
    That includes the 400 pages of reference material (among which are 270 pages of notes and 36 pages of bibliography). The narrative runs to just shy of 1,100 pages.

    3.8%: Cold open about Chicago (in re a period of time he wasn't living there).
    6.1%: Early life
    8.2%: College and brief private-sector employment
    12.1%: Alinskyite community organizing in Chicago
    12.2%: Law school & summer clerking
    7.8%: 1st book, academic employment, firm employment, marriage
    12.1%: Running for legislature, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, sitting in legislature.
    11.3%: Sitting in legislature, falling to Bobby Rush
    15.2%: Senate campaign
    6.5%: Congress (concludes with beginning of Pres. campaign)
    4.6%: Epilogue

    I'm wondering in the 164 pages devoted to his Senate campaign if Garrow managed to smoke out who kept feeding confidential paperwork on his opponents' divorce proceedings to the Chicago media (and if Garrow got an explanation from figures in the media as to why the stuff wasn't immediately returned unread).

    I’m wondering in the 164 pages devoted to his Senate campaign if Garrow managed to smoke out who kept feeding confidential paperwork on his opponents’ divorce proceedings to the Chicago media (and if Garrow got an explanation from figures in the media as to why the stuff wasn’t immediately returned unread).

    Good question.

    Incidentally, though I guess you haven’t actually read the book (or you wouldn’t be wondering about this), you are able to offer us a detailed mathematical breakdown of its contents, down to the nearest tenth of one percent! Remarkable.

  272. @Lot
    Yeah. Sorry it was at Cambridge in ‘65, so the undergrads were born 1943-1947.

    Buckley wasn’t too impressive either.

    “In the end, the Cambridge Union Society took a vote on the proposition: “The American Dream is at the expense of the American negro.” The yays outpolled the nays 540-160.”

    It was the 1890-1930 birth cohorts that raised, educated and indoctrinated the young Cambridge men to believe this crap. Ethno-masochism and smug leftist superiority over the benighted southern rednecks has a long pedigree.

    Buckley wasn’t too impressive either.

    He never was. Buckley’s main strength as a debater was his bizarre accent, which did him no good in England.

  273. Anon[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack Hanson
    Trump is invested in the Boomer worship of all things black. Republicans will probably be out the gate denouncing this as a Dem smear.

    Boomers don’t worship blacks (unless they’re famous athletes). They’re scared of blacks.

    All this “Dems are the Real Racists” stuff is groveling before the bully and telling him to beat up someone else today.

    Republicans and media conservatives (like FOX) kiss ass to black Republicans as a form of protection money. If someone accuses you of racism, you can wave around your special black friend as a protective talisman.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    All this “Dems are the Real Racists” stuff is groveling before the bully and telling him to beat up someone else today.
     
    "Racist" is a fake word that has never had any legitimate meaning.

    The real question is, are Dems the real realists? They went ballistic over the McDonald and Heller decisions because they knew perfectly well what would happen if the right to keep and bear arms was extended to blacks. As did the authors of the Bill of Rights, who agreed with them. As did their own Roger Taney.

    But if blacks don't have a right to arms, that opens up the question of what rights they do have. The whole voting-rights business is based on the same Fourteenth Amendment they're forced to oppose with respect to guns.

  274. @Steve Sailer
    My impression is that mid-Century southern states tended to be pretty adept at identifying the most gifted legislators of each generation and electing them young to Congress and then over and over, where they built up huge seniority and brought home lots of bacon: Byrd, Thurmond, Russell, etc.

    Perhaps this was due to Jim Crow southern states disenfranchising a lot of poor whites, so that the electorates were pretty elite. If the state bar society, say, felt that this young man was The Guy to represent our state in Washington, that message tended to get out to eligible voters.

    It wasn’t necessarily the state bar.

    In the town in Arkansas where I grew up there was a very influential newspaper publisher named Roberta Fulbright. She had a running feud of sorts with some Democratic Party leaders. At one point she used her considerable influence to get her son, J. William Fulbright elected to the senate.

    Fulbright spent 30 years in the senate, all as the state’s junior senator. Almost all of his primary victories were closely contested. He finally lost a primary in 1974 to Dale Bumpers, who was then governor of Arkansas. Political scientist Diane Blair said Bumpers had been the best governor Arkansas ever bad. Considering that Ms. Blair and her second husband Jim Blair were very close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton, that was a rather remarkable statement.

    • Replies: @Marty
    Any idea why the leading newspaper in both Fayetteville and L.R. was named the Democrat?
  275. @Prester John
    Didn't know about the drugs but--wouldn't be surprised. Nevertheless, bingo!!

    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    I once read a Princeton History of the United States written in the 1890s. It highlighted that cocaine abuse and violence were key social characteristics of black communities … with perhaps the former driving the latter. Given that, it is extremely likely that Martin Luther King and his cadre were very familiar with the enticements of drug-enhanced sex that increases the libido while suspending one’s judgment with respect to the risks and consequences of impulsive, over-the-edge behaviors.

    MLK having impersonal and anonymous sex with hundreds of women has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK telling jokes while watching a fellow minister “rape” a woman has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK and his cadre servicing multiple prostitutes in an orgy the night he was killed has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. QED

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    You've been reading too many dopey magazine articles.
  276. @anon
    I like the idea of deporting criminals. Strip them of their citizenship and deport them.
    This will reduce black demographics substantially in this country and remove the trouble-maker blacks. The blacks who remain will be law-abiding and therefore welcome.
    Over enough generations of this the black gene pool in this country will be greatly improved.

    Problem is there is no terra nullius to deport them to. If we deport our criminals to other countries they will start dumping their own on us (arguably Central America already is).

    So until Mars is terraformed….

  277. Art Deco, I apologize for triggering your fragile snowflake intellect with unwelcome facts pertaining to black guys who don’t kiss enough ass. I resolve to learn and grow from my hurtful conduct and only obsess about your Liberty University sumo cum loud honors-thesis stuff, and not Amilcar Cabral or other guys who outsmarted whitey and shitcanned him back to Myrtle Beach.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    That you're sarcastic doesn't render you less of a kook.
  278. @Art Deco
    So stay tuned for the next episode, what a giant horndog Malcolm X was.

    There are surviving letters from Malcolm Little to friends which are surprisingly intimate and in which he offers some distress that he'd not been able to satisfy his wife. Don't think he was much of a horn dog.

    Maybe he was too busy touring and lecturing to put the wood to Mrs. X. Or maybe he’d rather satisfy the guys. It’s long been rumored during his younger criminal days he dabbled in prostitution and hustling. IIRC those stories have never been conclusively proven but they’ve never been conclusively debunked either.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Given that the general assumptions people employ in discussions like this, no rumor about anyone can possibly be conclusively debunked.
    , @AceDeuce
    https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/04/the-sexuality-of-malcolm-x/237086/

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/19/gayrights.usa

    https://wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/spring-2011-the-city-bounces-back-four-portraits/a-revisionists-history/

    https://www.npr.org/2011/04/06/135180135/new-biography-raises-questions-about-malcolm-xs-sexuality

    https://www.gaycitynews.nyc/stories/2011/10/w8172-malcolm-xs-queer-affinities-2011-05-18.html

    https://www.socialistalternative.org/2011/06/27/malcolm-x-a-life-of-reinvention-book-review/

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/D087A343B0CA1BA14D54E541367B1639/core-reader

    http://www.thephora.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-21783.html

    https://www.queerty.com/malcolm-x-was-americas-greatest-civil-rights-escort-20110407
  279. @Anonymous
    Is anyone concerned about big government taping the hotel activites of MLK (or anyone else), or do Americans show less interest than Orwell’s country for another reason? Except when it comes to abortion, most Americans seem oblivious to the most egregious types of civil liberties violations. Back in the Eighties, the ACLU was concerned with this sort of thing, not with fostering mass-scale, welfare-assisted immigration.

    They were concerned with the Bill of Rights and its protection of citizens’ individual liberties.

    Given that MLK’s DNA Dynasty makes sure that people can’t use historical photos of the civil rights leader without paying them their due, you have to wonder whether the legal sensibilities of his heirs will be energized by something like video tapes of their relative’s most intimate moments, put out there for the world to gawk at like a freak show. Will they demand 4th Amendment privacy rights or money in return for the use of the images?

    “Is anyone concerned about big government taping the hotel activites of MLK (or anyone else), or do Americans show less interest than Orwell’s country for another reason? Except when it comes to abortion, most Americans seem oblivious to the most egregious types of civil liberties violations. Back in the Eighties, the ACLU was concerned with this sort of thing, not with fostering mass-scale, welfare-assisted immigration.
    They were concerned with the Bill of Rights and its protection of citizens’ individual liberties.”

    True. When I was a kid in the 80s the ACLU always seemed to get in the papers for suing small towns over nativity displays in the town park Separation of church and state don’tcha know. I always thought the ACLU were petulant buzzkills.

    But those are the good old days compared to the ACLU of the 2010s, which is trying to establish immigration as a right and pretends the Second Amendment doesn’t exist.

  280. @bored identity
    OT, but Uncle Sailer's favorite Wimmin Whine About Competition recurring theme:

    https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1132682554425765888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw


    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/445614-ocasio-cortez-hits-nyt-over-story-on-hope-hicks-its-framed-as-some-lifetime


    bored identity will not rest until Hope Hicks shape-shifts her hideously white-reptilian body & soul appearance into something* more Current Year palatable:

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/05/09/02/11921250-7008603-Melanie_Liverpool_Turner_33_pleaded_guilty_to_the_killing_of_49_-m-4_1557365010396.jpg

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/11/07/21/3A28AEF700000578-3914392-New_York_City_police_arrest_a_woman_after_a_commuter_was_pushed_-m-120_1478555865446.jpg

    ****************************************************************************************

    * The full story of that Hopefully Hicks is here:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7008603/Schizophrenic-woman-shoved-stranger-NYC-subway-train-dies-suicide-prison.html

    https://nypost.com/2016/11/08/woman-pushed-to-her-death-in-subway-was-a-wife-and-chef/

    https://popularcrime.com/2018/01/05/husband-of-subway-push-victim-sues-city-over-her-death/

    CBS does their thing:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-city-subway-push-suspect-melanie-liverpool-i-didnt-admit-to-nothing/

    And then, there's this push:

    https://www.amny.com/transit/times-square-42nd-street-subway-push-leaves-woman-dead-suspect-charged-nypd-says-1.12571224

    AOC really is an amusing idiot.

    People “dredge up” thuggish photos of shooting “victims” like Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin because it’s relevant to whether they were shot in self-defense while engaging in thug-like behavior.

    For non-compliance with a subpoena it’s not so much an issue. Besides, does AOC really think there are pictures of Hope Hicks flashing gang signs and posing with guns and stacks of cash. What a dope she is.

  281. @Jack Hanson
    The judge in Cosby's case specifically stated he unsealed the records relating to Cosby's past behaviors due to his comments regarding black dysfunction in the past.

    The judge in Cosby’s case specifically stated he unsealed the records relating to Cosby’s past behaviors due to his comments regarding black dysfunction in the past.

    That was a different Federal Judge from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from the one who presided over his criminal trials (Court of Common Pleas in Montgomery County).

    Still, I thought it was pretty outrageous.

    Additionally, the Common Pleas Judge presided over a pretrial hearing at which the District Attorney from the original investigation, Bruce Castor, testified that he had indeed made an agreement with Cosby’s attorneys not to prosecute if Cosby waived his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in a subsequent civil case in which the standard of proof is much lower. The civil case is the one in which Cosby gave deposition testimony that was later used against him in the recent criminal trials.

  282. @Anonymous
    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as '61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    But no white minister could have gotten away with being as brazen as King was then or now. The churches would not have tolerated it. Indeed, Swaggart's failing is that he was doing it right in front of the church of a rival preacher, who he himself had had defrocked for sex offenses:



    Background

    Swaggart's exposure came as retaliation for an incident in 1986 when Swaggart exposed fellow Assemblies of God minister Marvin Gorman, who had been accused of having several affairs. Once exposed, Gorman was defrocked from the Assemblies of God, his ministry all but ended. As a retaliatory move, Gorman hired his son Randy and son-in-law Garland Bilbo to stake out the Travel Inn on Airline Highway in Baton Rouge. A camera with a telephoto lens was placed in the window of the motel's Room 12, and was draped with a black cloth. When Swaggart arrived, he reportedly went into Room 7. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo let the air out of the tires on Swaggart's vehicle. They called Marvin Gorman, whose church was located nearby. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo had taken photos of Swaggart outside Room 7 with Debra Murphree,[6][7] a local prostitute. Gorman arrived at the Travel Inn a short while later and asked Swaggart what he was doing there.

    According to Swaggart: The Unauthorized Biography of an American Evangelist, by Ann Rowe Seaman, Gorman secured a promise from Swaggart that he would publicly apologize to Gorman and start the process of Gorman's reinstatement to the Assemblies of God. Gorman offered to remain silent if Swaggart would state publicly that he lied about Gorman's affairs. Gorman waited almost a year, then hand-delivered a note to Swaggart informing him his time was up; Swaggart did not respond. On February 16, 1988, Gorman contacted James Hamil, one of the 13-man Executive Presbytery of the Assemblies of God, who called Raymond Carlson, the Assemblies Superintendent. Carlson summoned Hamill and Gorman to fly to Assemblies of God headquarters in Springfield, Missouri and arranged for an emergency meeting of the presbyters. He was shown photos of several men coming in and going out of Room 7 at the Travel Inn Motel in New Orleans. This was done to establish that the room was being used for prostitution. One of the men seen leaving Room 7 was Swaggart. The presbytery leadership of the Assemblies of God decided that Swaggart should be suspended from broadcasting his television program for three months.

     

    Swaggart, a man whose crowd-working capacities rival those of James Brown, Mick Jagger, and that guy with the funny mustache from Austria, is not especially known for his planning acumen, but there's no evidence he's especially stupid. The case for him wanting to be punished is plausible.
    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn't give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It's possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to
    "deal with" him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible "dixie cup" assassin-a disposable asset.

    Short of a Final Judgment Day on which the sins of all are revealed, we'll never know for sure. As in the deaths of the Kennedys, Marilyn Monroe, and indeed many others, the conspiracy theories are thick but everyone involved is now dead and the matter is legally otiose at this point.

    But what we do know is that the man we know as "Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King" was morally bankrupt, a sexual beast who hired and often beat white prostitutes with church funds, a willing tool of communist operatives, the holder of a doctorate obtained by fraud, and who was never legally named Martin Luther King.

    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn’t give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It’s possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to “deal with” him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible “dixie cup” assassin-a disposable asset.

    I think this works only if you assume that the deep state preferred the black radicals to MLK because they were self-discrediting and cast black liberation and civil rights movements in an unacceptable light.

    On the other hand, if you let King know that you know what you know, he’s owned and can’t stray into more radical approaches.

  283. @Dr. Robert Morgan
    Steve Sailer: "And then they came for MLK..."

    I'm sure they did, over and over and over again. He's an American Dream, the perfect combination of "muh dik" negro and the ability to talk like a white man without lapsing into ebonics. It should come as no surprise that the fact that he has been exposed as a complete fraud only makes him more attractive to the society of liars called the USA. If he didn't exist it would have been necessary for them to invent him.

    Art Deco: "He has his virtues and accomplishments. "

    The same could be said of anyone. But let's give him his due. The society of liars wouldn't have memorialized just anyone with a statue 30 feet tall. He was a special negro with a unique combination of talents and a gift for plagiarism that earned him a doctorate from a Bible college; one that a majority of whites, in their Christianized culture, love to kneel before.

    I’m sure they did, over and over and over again. He’s an American Dream, the perfect combination of “muh dik” negro and the ability to talk like a white man without lapsing into ebonics.

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.
     
    Many English people, including members of my own family, switch back and forth between speaking regional dialects and speaking standard English depending on whom they are talking to, and the situation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riwKuKSbFDs

    , @ScarletNumber
    This is known as code switching.
  284. @Anonymous
    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as '61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    But no white minister could have gotten away with being as brazen as King was then or now. The churches would not have tolerated it. Indeed, Swaggart's failing is that he was doing it right in front of the church of a rival preacher, who he himself had had defrocked for sex offenses:



    Background

    Swaggart's exposure came as retaliation for an incident in 1986 when Swaggart exposed fellow Assemblies of God minister Marvin Gorman, who had been accused of having several affairs. Once exposed, Gorman was defrocked from the Assemblies of God, his ministry all but ended. As a retaliatory move, Gorman hired his son Randy and son-in-law Garland Bilbo to stake out the Travel Inn on Airline Highway in Baton Rouge. A camera with a telephoto lens was placed in the window of the motel's Room 12, and was draped with a black cloth. When Swaggart arrived, he reportedly went into Room 7. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo let the air out of the tires on Swaggart's vehicle. They called Marvin Gorman, whose church was located nearby. Randy Gorman and Garland Bilbo had taken photos of Swaggart outside Room 7 with Debra Murphree,[6][7] a local prostitute. Gorman arrived at the Travel Inn a short while later and asked Swaggart what he was doing there.

    According to Swaggart: The Unauthorized Biography of an American Evangelist, by Ann Rowe Seaman, Gorman secured a promise from Swaggart that he would publicly apologize to Gorman and start the process of Gorman's reinstatement to the Assemblies of God. Gorman offered to remain silent if Swaggart would state publicly that he lied about Gorman's affairs. Gorman waited almost a year, then hand-delivered a note to Swaggart informing him his time was up; Swaggart did not respond. On February 16, 1988, Gorman contacted James Hamil, one of the 13-man Executive Presbytery of the Assemblies of God, who called Raymond Carlson, the Assemblies Superintendent. Carlson summoned Hamill and Gorman to fly to Assemblies of God headquarters in Springfield, Missouri and arranged for an emergency meeting of the presbyters. He was shown photos of several men coming in and going out of Room 7 at the Travel Inn Motel in New Orleans. This was done to establish that the room was being used for prostitution. One of the men seen leaving Room 7 was Swaggart. The presbytery leadership of the Assemblies of God decided that Swaggart should be suspended from broadcasting his television program for three months.

     

    Swaggart, a man whose crowd-working capacities rival those of James Brown, Mick Jagger, and that guy with the funny mustache from Austria, is not especially known for his planning acumen, but there's no evidence he's especially stupid. The case for him wanting to be punished is plausible.
    King, on the other hand, was a sadist, not a masochist. He just didn't give a shit and once having gotten away with it never bothered to think it would cause trouble for him. It's possible-who knows?-his handlers had talked to him about it and he was not responding and they figured it would blow up on them sooner or later, and possibly that was a factor in the possible decision to
    "deal with" him. Certainly such people would have had no moral scruples against doing so, and James Earl Ray is a plausible "dixie cup" assassin-a disposable asset.

    Short of a Final Judgment Day on which the sins of all are revealed, we'll never know for sure. As in the deaths of the Kennedys, Marilyn Monroe, and indeed many others, the conspiracy theories are thick but everyone involved is now dead and the matter is legally otiose at this point.

    But what we do know is that the man we know as "Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King" was morally bankrupt, a sexual beast who hired and often beat white prostitutes with church funds, a willing tool of communist operatives, the holder of a doctorate obtained by fraud, and who was never legally named Martin Luther King.

    It was well known on both the racial and nonracial right and by anyone who was around him, including a lot of press people and church people. They stayed quiet about it.

    Who are you talking about here? King? No it wasn’t.

    To be fair it was a different time. Everyone knew that JFK was nailing a lot of women and that was out of the mainstream press too (though even MAD Magazine commented as early as ’61 that Monroe was a person of interest to JFK) and a lot of other politicians fooled around too in ways that would be career ending even to a Democrat now.

    No, it wasn’t generally known until 1975. There were people on the White House staff who didn’t know. Some reporters have indicated they were familiar with what was going on (e.g. Adela Rogers St. John).

    • Replies: @David In TN
    "No, it wasn't generally known until 1975."

    In late 1975, the Judith Exner story was unearthed by the Church committee and was all over the news. Then Time magazine did a "JFK's Other Women" story.

    This was the first time it was in the MSM.
  285. @Corn
    Maybe he was too busy touring and lecturing to put the wood to Mrs. X. Or maybe he’d rather satisfy the guys. It’s long been rumored during his younger criminal days he dabbled in prostitution and hustling. IIRC those stories have never been conclusively proven but they’ve never been conclusively debunked either.

    Given that the general assumptions people employ in discussions like this, no rumor about anyone can possibly be conclusively debunked.

  286. @Ober's coonhound
    Art Deco, I apologize for triggering your fragile snowflake intellect with unwelcome facts pertaining to black guys who don't kiss enough ass. I resolve to learn and grow from my hurtful conduct and only obsess about your Liberty University sumo cum loud honors-thesis stuff, and not Amilcar Cabral or other guys who outsmarted whitey and shitcanned him back to Myrtle Beach.

    That you’re sarcastic doesn’t render you less of a kook.

  287. @TheJester
    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    I once read a Princeton History of the United States written in the 1890s. It highlighted that cocaine abuse and violence were key social characteristics of black communities ... with perhaps the former driving the latter. Given that, it is extremely likely that Martin Luther King and his cadre were very familiar with the enticements of drug-enhanced sex that increases the libido while suspending one's judgment with respect to the risks and consequences of impulsive, over-the-edge behaviors.

    MLK having impersonal and anonymous sex with hundreds of women has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK telling jokes while watching a fellow minister "rape" a woman has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. MLK and his cadre servicing multiple prostitutes in an orgy the night he was killed has all of the characteristics of drug-enhanced sex. QED

    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    You’ve been reading too many dopey magazine articles.

    • Replies: @TheJester
    I've read a number of your other comments. Not worth my attention.

    However, for others, I lived through the social, drug, and sexual revolution of the 1960s through the 1980s and saw everything I noted first hand. I saw people I cared about ruin their marriages and their futures with promiscuous drug-driven sex ... and one of my closest friends, a homosexual, died of AIDS in the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.

    A short trip into the literature of the times and you will find people applauding this as the "Golden Age of Pedophilia". This is also the time period in which most of the clerical sexual abuse of young boys in the Catholic Church occurred. They are still cleaning up that mess.

    Others might remember the drug-fueled hippie communes and their sexual orgies. Does anyone recall Charles Manson and his "tribe" as a caricature of the times? MLK was evidently fully involved in the culture of the times.
  288. i’m lovin’ it. the day of reckoning has arrived. 😀

  289. @Reg Cæsar

    The boomer conservatives on FreeRepublic mostly don’t believe these allegations, don’t care and don’t want to hear about it:
     
    I'm shocked! Free Republic is still going?

    I think it was 20 years last month that I logged out for good. Except for one visit in 2000, to defend our own Steve. For which I was banned.

    Yeah, it’s still going. Those types of people are still probably the majority of conservatives in this country. They are certainly the large majority of boomer aged conservatives. Tell us more about what happened. What was the context in which you were defending Steve and what did those clowns say when they banned you?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    Someone posted one of Steve's pieces, and readers were told not to do that again. Steve wasn't welcome there.

    Funny, he was welcome at UPI.

    I wrote something anodyne in his defense. Knee-jerk Robinson personally suspended me. I've never gone back.
  290. @Art Deco
    What did Levison ever do that you'd get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?

    What did Levison ever do that you’d get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?

    I know nothing about Levison’s “psi-power,” but can tell you that he was the CPUSA money man in charge of funding King’s activities. The CPUSA had been funding agitation in the US black community since the 1930s, e.g., engaging a lawyer for the “Scottsboro Boys,” and in this activity it had been a conduit for monies sent by the Soviet Union. King was an alumnus of the Highlander Folk School, a communist front in east Tennessee, as was Rosa Parks. The entire so-called civil rights movement at that time was substantially an organ for Soviet political interference in and destabilization of the American political order.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    but can tell you that he was the CPUSA money man in charge of funding King’s activities.

    King had no need of CPUSA money men. When King started his organization in 1956, the Communist Party was underground and had lost > 80% of its membership.
  291. @Paleo Liberal
    It wasn’t necessarily the state bar.

    In the town in Arkansas where I grew up there was a very influential newspaper publisher named Roberta Fulbright. She had a running feud of sorts with some Democratic Party leaders. At one point she used her considerable influence to get her son, J. William Fulbright elected to the senate.

    Fulbright spent 30 years in the senate, all as the state’s junior senator. Almost all of his primary victories were closely contested. He finally lost a primary in 1974 to Dale Bumpers, who was then governor of Arkansas. Political scientist Diane Blair said Bumpers had been the best governor Arkansas ever bad. Considering that Ms. Blair and her second husband Jim Blair were very close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton, that was a rather remarkable statement.

    Any idea why the leading newspaper in both Fayetteville and L.R. was named the Democrat?

    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
    At one point the leading paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Gazette. In Fayetteville was the Northwest Arkansas Times. The second biggest paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Democrat. That dates back from the days when newspapers were more openly partisan. A number of papers throughout the country were called this or that Democrat or Republican. In the old South “Democrat “ was a more common name.

    When newspapers started going out of business, the Arkansas Democrat acquired the Gazette. Many years later they acquired the NW Arkansas Times as well. Now both the old Gazette and the old Times are called Democrat.

    I lived in Conway, Arkansas for a little while in the 1990s. The local paper there was the Log Cabin Democrat.

    The irony is at the time the Democrat bought out the Gazette, the Gazette still had a pro-Democratic editorial board but the Democrat was heavily Republican.
  292. @Marty
    Any idea why the leading newspaper in both Fayetteville and L.R. was named the Democrat?

    At one point the leading paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Gazette. In Fayetteville was the Northwest Arkansas Times. The second biggest paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Democrat. That dates back from the days when newspapers were more openly partisan. A number of papers throughout the country were called this or that Democrat or Republican. In the old South “Democrat “ was a more common name.

    When newspapers started going out of business, the Arkansas Democrat acquired the Gazette. Many years later they acquired the NW Arkansas Times as well. Now both the old Gazette and the old Times are called Democrat.

    I lived in Conway, Arkansas for a little while in the 1990s. The local paper there was the Log Cabin Democrat.

    The irony is at the time the Democrat bought out the Gazette, the Gazette still had a pro-Democratic editorial board but the Democrat was heavily Republican.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    That dates back from the days when newspapers were more openly partisan. A number of papers throughout the country were called this or that Democrat or Republican.
     
    Also, "democrat" and "republican" have generic meanings that people in this country tend to forget. Some of these papers might have been thinking along those lines.

    The Plattsburgh, N.Y., Republican was founded in 1811, long before the party.
  293. @ATBOTL
    Yeah, it's still going. Those types of people are still probably the majority of conservatives in this country. They are certainly the large majority of boomer aged conservatives. Tell us more about what happened. What was the context in which you were defending Steve and what did those clowns say when they banned you?

    Someone posted one of Steve’s pieces, and readers were told not to do that again. Steve wasn’t welcome there.

    Funny, he was welcome at UPI.

    I wrote something anodyne in his defense. Knee-jerk Robinson personally suspended me. I’ve never gone back.

    • Replies: @ATBOTL
    That's classic FR. Do you remember what the piece was about?
  294. @Paleo Liberal
    At one point the leading paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Gazette. In Fayetteville was the Northwest Arkansas Times. The second biggest paper in Little Rock was the Arkansas Democrat. That dates back from the days when newspapers were more openly partisan. A number of papers throughout the country were called this or that Democrat or Republican. In the old South “Democrat “ was a more common name.

    When newspapers started going out of business, the Arkansas Democrat acquired the Gazette. Many years later they acquired the NW Arkansas Times as well. Now both the old Gazette and the old Times are called Democrat.

    I lived in Conway, Arkansas for a little while in the 1990s. The local paper there was the Log Cabin Democrat.

    The irony is at the time the Democrat bought out the Gazette, the Gazette still had a pro-Democratic editorial board but the Democrat was heavily Republican.

    That dates back from the days when newspapers were more openly partisan. A number of papers throughout the country were called this or that Democrat or Republican.

    Also, “democrat” and “republican” have generic meanings that people in this country tend to forget. Some of these papers might have been thinking along those lines.

    The Plattsburgh, N.Y., Republican was founded in 1811, long before the party.

    • Replies: @snorlax
    The party of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison was known as the Republican Party; it's now referred to as the Democratic-Republican Party to differentiate it from the later party (which was named for the earlier one).
  295. @Anon
    Boomers don't worship blacks (unless they're famous athletes). They're scared of blacks.

    All this "Dems are the Real Racists" stuff is groveling before the bully and telling him to beat up someone else today.

    Republicans and media conservatives (like FOX) kiss ass to black Republicans as a form of protection money. If someone accuses you of racism, you can wave around your special black friend as a protective talisman.

    All this “Dems are the Real Racists” stuff is groveling before the bully and telling him to beat up someone else today.

    “Racist” is a fake word that has never had any legitimate meaning.

    The real question is, are Dems the real realists? They went ballistic over the McDonald and Heller decisions because they knew perfectly well what would happen if the right to keep and bear arms was extended to blacks. As did the authors of the Bill of Rights, who agreed with them. As did their own Roger Taney.

    But if blacks don’t have a right to arms, that opens up the question of what rights they do have. The whole voting-rights business is based on the same Fourteenth Amendment they’re forced to oppose with respect to guns.

  296. @Cleburne
    Quite right, Jake. Mel Bradford and Gene Genovese were on to them before anyone else. I think McPherson’s Battle Cry of Freedom, which institutionalized the imperial myth, marked a real turning point in how the war could be discussed.

    So should segregation have been left in place? Should some other approach have been used to end it?

    I find it very frustrating that people comment on here about how bad all these decisions have been but offer no counterpoint to what was clearly unequal treatment. You have a sign on a public bus that says, “Colored to the rear”, which my sister saw, illegal and unenforced, in SC in 1981, and you think it won’t piss people off to the point of action?

    Yes, the civil rights movement was full of commies and criminals, but what were the good people doing to end segregation, and would that have worked? And here we thought MLK’s non-violent tactics were the correct ones.

    • Replies: @Anonymous

    You have a sign on a public bus that says, “Colored to the rear”, which my sister saw, illegal and unenforced, in SC in 1981.
     
    Things that didn't happen.
  297. @Reg Cæsar
    Someone posted one of Steve's pieces, and readers were told not to do that again. Steve wasn't welcome there.

    Funny, he was welcome at UPI.

    I wrote something anodyne in his defense. Knee-jerk Robinson personally suspended me. I've never gone back.

    That’s classic FR. Do you remember what the piece was about?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    Steve did a follow-up which mentioned FR's censorship. Check his pre-Unz archives, or Vdare.com's.
  298. @Anon
    Some interesting details:

    https://twitter.com/jamesmacm/status/1132596607021703169

    -- The Guardian spiked the story at the last minute: SJWs pressuring from below?

    -- The Atlantic and the Washington Post chickened out.

    -- An unnamed web magazine "whose raison d'etre is to fight for free speech" wouldn't print it. Quillette*?

    -- The FBI summaries came from among 19,000 documents released by Donald Trump in 2018 relating to the Kennedy assasination.

    -- The law requiring the release of such documents was passed in the wake of Oliver Stone's freaky conspiracy movie JFK.

    -- The FBI just let a rape and other shit happen to protect sources and methods.

    -- Eight percent of the membership of the U.S. Communist Party were FBI informants.

    *"Quillette is a platform for free thought. We respect ideas, even dangerous ones. We also believe that free expression and the free exchange of ideas help human societies flourish and progress. Quillette aims to provide a platform for this exchange."

    I don’t blame Quilette, they’ve got enough to deal with. The statistics about infiltration of far-left organizations in the 60s reminds me of the old joke that on the internet, the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents.

  299. I wrote about similar observations about the tapes made by Garrow three years ago. Why is this suddenly “news” again?
    https://www.takimag.com/article/martin_luther_king_pussy_grabber_kathy_shaidle/

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It was never news to anyone who reads cootie infested right wing literature. Most of King's perfidies were known to me when I was in high school (late seventies).

    You couldn't tell anyone though or they'd get upset and call you a liar. It was more uncool than preferring the Clash or Ramones to Rush, Zep or Floyd. Way more uncool.
  300. @Art Deco
    I’m sure they did, over and over and over again. He’s an American Dream, the perfect combination of “muh dik” negro and the ability to talk like a white man without lapsing into ebonics.

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.

    Many English people, including members of my own family, switch back and forth between speaking regional dialects and speaking standard English depending on whom they are talking to, and the situation.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    You're British, right?

    I've seen that tape. That fellow is demonstrating accents. There may be some regional colloquial vocabulary t00. Linguistics isn't my subject, but if I understand correctly, that's qualitatively different from what they mean by 'diglossia', which differentiates spoken Arabic vernaculars, Modern Literary Arabic, and Classical Arabic or demotic Greek from formal Greek.

    The demotic used by American blacks has some structural differences with standard English (it uses 'aspects' rather than 'tenses' per one linguist whose lectures I have). Also, the dynamics of it can be quite different. Blacks do not use full-on demotic unless they've tuned out the non-blacks around them. However, the distinction between standard English and the demotic can be fuzzy because when blacks speak ungrammatical English, they usually do so by incorporating elements of the demotic into standard English sentences (e.g. treating 'to be' as a regular verb).

    There are other differences in speech patterns. Regional accents are dying in the U.S., but what you see outside the black population is that the Southern accent is disappearing. What Thos Sowell has noted is that blacks who grow up in New York and Chicago these days all sound like Southern blacks, which he indicates wasn't the case in the 1940s. Vocal timbre and elocution also differs. Every once in a while you meet someone black with precise elocution, but that's atypical even among quite extensively educated blacks.

    Bayard Rustin actually took elocution lessons as a youth, but even he didn't have particularly clipped speech.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z66EZVtW_Q

  301. @Art Deco
    Drug-enhanced sex fueled by marijuana, methamphetamines, LSD, and cocaine was part of the culture in the 1965-through-1980s social and sexual revolutions. This was all the rage on university campuses at the time and, it now appears, in Catholic seminaries and among the Vatican Curia in the post-Vatican II era. It all came to a screeching halt in the 1980s with the die-off associated with the AIDS epidemic.

    You've been reading too many dopey magazine articles.

    I’ve read a number of your other comments. Not worth my attention.

    However, for others, I lived through the social, drug, and sexual revolution of the 1960s through the 1980s and saw everything I noted first hand. I saw people I cared about ruin their marriages and their futures with promiscuous drug-driven sex … and one of my closest friends, a homosexual, died of AIDS in the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.

    A short trip into the literature of the times and you will find people applauding this as the “Golden Age of Pedophilia”. This is also the time period in which most of the clerical sexual abuse of young boys in the Catholic Church occurred. They are still cleaning up that mess.

    Others might remember the drug-fueled hippie communes and their sexual orgies. Does anyone recall Charles Manson and his “tribe” as a caricature of the times? MLK was evidently fully involved in the culture of the times.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    I lived through it too. There was an aspect which you saw in everyday life and an aspect which was manifest only in odd subcultures. The divorce courts, the street crime, cannabis, LSD (for a short time), the Ford Pinto, the ugly clothes and the bad haircuts were everyday life. The East Village, hippiedom, Castro Street and Christopher Street, swinging, &c were odd subcultures.

    As for what was up in the Catholic Church, the point of origin of the sexual misconduct appears to have been around 1930, you had a rapid escalation in the phenomenon over the period running from 1950 to 1970, a plateau between 1970 and 1990, and then a rapid collapse after 1990. For the most part, it was pederasty, not paedophilia, and it involved a small subset of the clergy.

    Much more visible (and likely damaging) was the ruin of Catholic liturgy in that era. Unlike the sexual misconduct, the ruin of the liturgy was official policy.
    , @Art Deco
    Does anyone recall Charles Manson and his “tribe” as a caricature of the times?

    He wasn't. Just a gruesome human interest story.
  302. @Crawfurdmuir

    What did Levison ever do that you’d get the idea that he had the psi-power to make everyone around him an instrument of his objects?
     
    I know nothing about Levison's "psi-power," but can tell you that he was the CPUSA money man in charge of funding King's activities. The CPUSA had been funding agitation in the US black community since the 1930s, e.g., engaging a lawyer for the "Scottsboro Boys," and in this activity it had been a conduit for monies sent by the Soviet Union. King was an alumnus of the Highlander Folk School, a communist front in east Tennessee, as was Rosa Parks. The entire so-called civil rights movement at that time was substantially an organ for Soviet political interference in and destabilization of the American political order.

    but can tell you that he was the CPUSA money man in charge of funding King’s activities.

    King had no need of CPUSA money men. When King started his organization in 1956, the Communist Party was underground and had lost > 80% of its membership.

    • Replies: @Crawfurdmuir

    King had no need of CPUSA money men.
     
    If that is so, then why did he maintain such a steadfast, close, and long-term relationship with Stanley Levison, as well as with Hunter Pitts O'Dell, and other Communists?

    It is at the very least irrelevant that the CPUSA had lost membership since its heyday during the FDR years. The political climate had shifted against it by the '50s and many of its supporters found it convenient to cease overt association with the CPUSA. That did not mean that they all experienced conversions like those of Whittaker Chambers or James Burnham. Rather, they continued to support the Left, often through front organizations. Moreover, the CPUSA continued to function as a conduit (though not the only one) for Soviet money and influence into the United States for purposes of propaganda, disinformation, and destabilization. Indeed, Gus Hall continued to receive suitcases of cash from the Soviet Union for decades thereafter, through all his presidential runs in 1972, 1976 (when John Brennan voted for him!), 1980, and 1984, and right up through the end of the Soviet Union. Says Wikipedia:

    In 1992, the Moscow daily Izvestia claimed that the CPUSA had received over $40 million in payments from the Soviet Union, contradicting Hall's long-standing claims of financial independence. The former KGB General Oleg Kalugin declared in his memoir that the KGB had Hall and the American Communist Party "under total control"....
     
    How much of that $40 million do you suppose ended up funding King's rabble-rousing?
  303. @Jonathan Mason

    Most blacks move back and forth between standard English and dialect during the course of the day. That sort of thing is atypical in English, but other languages (Arabic, Modern Greek) have formal and demotic modes between which adepts oscillate.
     
    Many English people, including members of my own family, switch back and forth between speaking regional dialects and speaking standard English depending on whom they are talking to, and the situation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riwKuKSbFDs

    You’re British, right?

    I’ve seen that tape. That fellow is demonstrating accents. There may be some regional colloquial vocabulary t00. Linguistics isn’t my subject, but if I understand correctly, that’s qualitatively different from what they mean by ‘diglossia’, which differentiates spoken Arabic vernaculars, Modern Literary Arabic, and Classical Arabic or demotic Greek from formal Greek.

    The demotic used by American blacks has some structural differences with standard English (it uses ‘aspects’ rather than ‘tenses’ per one linguist whose lectures I have). Also, the dynamics of it can be quite different. Blacks do not use full-on demotic unless they’ve tuned out the non-blacks around them. However, the distinction between standard English and the demotic can be fuzzy because when blacks speak ungrammatical English, they usually do so by incorporating elements of the demotic into standard English sentences (e.g. treating ‘to be’ as a regular verb).

    There are other differences in speech patterns. Regional accents are dying in the U.S., but what you see outside the black population is that the Southern accent is disappearing. What Thos Sowell has noted is that blacks who grow up in New York and Chicago these days all sound like Southern blacks, which he indicates wasn’t the case in the 1940s. Vocal timbre and elocution also differs. Every once in a while you meet someone black with precise elocution, but that’s atypical even among quite extensively educated blacks.

    Bayard Rustin actually took elocution lessons as a youth, but even he didn’t have particularly clipped speech.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Linguistics isn’t my subject

    What is your subject?
    , @Jonathan Mason
    Yes, I gave the link to that video because it was rather amusing, but it does demonstrate some of the numerous variations of the English language, and includes examples like Jamaican patois, which like ebonics is a kind of English Creole.

    Many years ago Albert Shanker, who was the leader of a Teachers' Union in the US, wrote a weekly column in the New York Times, and wrote once about children from St. Kitts in New York, who were unable to understand standard English since they spoke a local Kittitian (sic) patois that was mutually incomprehensible with standard English.

    I wrote to him and pointed out that if that was the case, these children would not be able to understand radio and TV news in St. Kitts. or anything else on TV for that matter, so they would be in a bad way wherever they lived.

    But really this is the case all over the English speaking world where there is a large disconnect between the spoken language and the official and written la