Jessica Winter in The New Yorker writes about an amusing war in Amherst, MA’s public schools that pits ultra-liberal white parents Munchausen Syndroming their children into the transgender faith vs. black and Hispanic Christian DEI hire staffers who think this trans stuff is the work of Satan:
Amherst is a very liberal town, with the stereotypical In This House… signs everywhere. The local high school newspaper published an article about the “life or death” nature of “the failure to protect trans kids.” 2/ pic.twitter.com/tLju1Wsozj
— Yang (@AxiomAmerican) April 4, 2024
This kind of pile-up is happening all over America. Left-wing communities constantly break down into infighting. 4/ pic.twitter.com/cW1nMGdUA7
— Yang (@AxiomAmerican) April 4, 2024
Two kids that identified as trans, Jo and Casey, often had to leave classes due to not being able to handle teachers not using the pronouns they chose. 6/ pic.twitter.com/FpMmRPYyum
— Yang (@AxiomAmerican) April 4, 2024
It just occurred to me that after years of being baffled by quotes of a mother referring to “they” of ambiguous number, that we could clear up the grammatical confusion created by this practice by changing the nonbinary pronoun from “they” to a more appropriately reverential “They.” This mother’s child is sacred, better than other children, and deserves to have Their pronoun capitalized.
Of course, capitalizing a nonbinary They’s pronoun only works in writing. So we need some sort of gesture to accompany They in speech to indicate we are referencing just a single one of our Betters. Maybe full body prostration whenever we say “They?”

In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until The jews moved in and ruined it.

RSS

















In the style of Jack D, you could have written “In the comments, I hope to see dozens of the Men of Unz explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until joooooos moved in and ruined it.
“In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until jews moved in and ruined it.”
You’re starting to sound like Jack D.
Diversity is our strength.
My second thought is: Do you seriously think these Amherstians came up with the transgender concept themselves at all? Hell no they didn’t. They’re just susceptible, as in open to almost any idea they think is liberal and smacks of freedom.
Oh, shame on those ancestral whites in New England, one of the birthplaces of all that enables you to pontificate here. Oh, ha ha, laugh at them from SoCal Suburbia.
Somebody sold them a pile of shit, and they ate it up. Suckers. The worst thing you can say about them is that they are suckers. Well-meaning people often are marks, marks for con men.
Who are the con men?
Don’t worry, though, the immivasion by old-country people will straighten them out.
In case you don’t know (but you do, oh you do) this tranny thing is irrelevant to what is really going on.
And I don’t know what it really going on, only that it is not this.
Whenever I filled out paperwork (now they use a tablet) at my medical appointments I also always answer the question about preferred pronouns:
Thou, Thee, Thy, Thine, & Ye.
I think it’s highly amusing that one of the people is named Dykes.
College towns are the worst. They’re full of intellectually insecure neurotics constantly trying to one-up each other and set themselves above the local yokels. It would be fun to say to an Amherst prof, “Your accent sounds real old-timey New England – did you grow up around here?”
In this case, the blacks are objecting to their kids being trooned. Well done them.
This tweet by a woke medic is another example. She calls whites “birthing people” but dares not use that language on blacks and Hispanics.
These are puritanical, prudish, Yankees. The gang who brought you that business in Salem. They are upright, probably too God fearing, and smart. It’s no accident Harvard is in Boston.
But…
When you flush Christianity, something else fills the void.
With these folks, prohibitions against dancing, bright colored clothing, and an inclination to self-immiseration – “I’d rather eat beets than ice cream” – has morphed into ethno-masochism, panic over the imminent apocalypse (climate change), and, most disturbingly and more difficult to explain, mutilating their children.
“In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until jews moved in and ruined it.”
Hunh? Amherst is in the Pioneer Valley. It’s one of those areas where the old-line liberals would vote for the magic (D) no matter what. If social justice demanded that everyone do the hokey-pokey on the common Sundays at 4PM, guess where everyone would be …
That’s an excellent idea! Furthermore, specifying the second person pronoun means you’ll get to hear the staff using it. With the third person pronouns, the individual isn’t usually present.
The people that started this pronoun nonsense need to deal with it.
I love my fellow Nice White New Englanders, but yes, they trend kooky in certain ways. A compounding factor: low fertility. Yankee idealism of the past was somewhat constrained by their historic tendency to work 100 hours a week and have 15 kids. Today, Nice White New England Towns like Amherst are largely composed of old individuals/couples or else parents of just one or two children: basically, people (particularly women) with too much time on their hands and too few offspring among whom to spread the burden of expectation.
So I’ll go out on a limb here per Steve’s little snark at the end there and play devil’s advocate for the sake of discussion.
I’ve seen it argued that while white Gentiles have no problems espousing and championing evil and destructive nonsense such as the current transgender insanity, without Jewish influence, they wouldn’t dream that crap up on their own. So the argument would be, say in an alternate universe where Hitler won, Amherst would be lily white today, neither suffering from transgender mania nor non-white demographic replacement.
I’m too ignorant to say whether there’s any merit to that argument (my assumption is there’s not much, if any–but, again, I’m an ignoramus), but I believe that’d be the typical “counter-Semitic” response.
I eagerly await seeing where this goes lol.
An excerpt from the article:
I’ve noticed these trans kids almost always have a laundry list of other mental disorders.
Not that I am trying to be reductive, but Jews actually have a bigger influence on Amherst than a typical American town – all but a very few areas, in fact.
It’s not some normal town by any measure. It’s got the flagship state school and half the population are students, and, surprise, surprise, a fair number of the radical ones are Jews, often from NYC or Brooklyn. And you’ll find them going around trying to get people to sign gay petitions.
Does it rub off on the local high school? Probably.
Is it Jews specifically? Not necessarily, but it is not a good place to advance the null hypothesis.
Whoever heard of a 19th Century Amherst Protestant who wasn’t 110% hetero?
It’s about time people started noticing Unitarians as well.
3 notes:
LGTBQ could eventually used as an excuse to sanction other governments because nation A isn’t accommodating trans-kids pronouns and thus violating their human rights. This is why CIA supports it. This could escalate right on up to regime change operations.
LGTBQ undermines traditional religions, because their traditional God is is a homophobe and thus illegitimate. LGTBQ can be used against Islam in this way in particular.
Kids can be taken from homes in some jurisdictions if the parents refuse to support their transition or refuse to use the chosen pronouns. I’m sure plenty of pedophiles are excited to see children taken away from their protective parents and placed elsewhere, where the predators have a better chance.
One more note………..it’s just another way to cause division, lower birthrates, and general unhappiness. The pharma industry and counselor army will get a few new jobs created and thus more $ also. Lawyers will get more work too.
That was a long time ago. Americans have, you know, been moving around a lot for a long time. Some of us are not puritanical or prudish, and we didn’t start out as Yankees.
Disappointing. I thought that Emily Dickinson Amherst was at least 95% white- and it is barely over 76%.
What’s the matter with these people?
They’ve been crazy from the 1870s (Henry James, “The Bostonians”) & now they’re even crazier.
Steve: That’s a depiction of a half prostration. I hope this is not intended to subtly mislead your readers into rendering a mere pro forma respect. No half measures, when it comes our betters!
This why all y’all stupid to be trying to quash the trans movement.
You done been told already!
As I suspected, here are some important NOTICINGS. Call me shocked that you didn’t offer insight.
—In truth, the crisis was a collision of multiple issues: racial tension, union power, the respectful treatment of queer and trans kids, and the place of religion in schools—not to mention the aftermath of the covid-19 pandemic and what it has done to the fabric of civic life in the U.S. The public schools in Amherst were slow to return to pre-pandemic normalcy; they reopened for a mix of in-person and remote learning in April, 2021, only after they were forced to by the state of Massachusetts. “We had physicians, psychiatrists, social workers, and parents writing to us in despair about the impact that remote learning was having on the emotional and mental health of the children in our community,” Allison Bleyler McDonald, a former school-committee member, told me. Leaders of the Amherst teachers’ union “refused to even speak to us about the possibility of opening up schools and classrooms,” she said—
…
—The Amherst district has often lacked consistent leadership, and nowhere was that more evident than at arms. Late in 2022, the principal at the time, Diego Sharon, had been in and out on family and medical leaves; Morris appointed Delinda Dykes to fill in, but she lasted less than six weeks, after parents complained that she had summoned a dozen or more students to the principal’s office for being boisterous in the cafeteria. Two finalists for the job eventually withdrew their applications, and Morris slotted the high-school principal, Talib Sadiq, into the role. The middle and high schools sit across the street from each other; Sadiq still oversees both, walking back and forth between them in the course of the school day.—
…
—Many people in the Amherst district describe a community that has become habituated to outrage—addicted to conflict and reprisal. Here, as in so many pockets of America these days, conflict doesn’t seem to be part of a difficult journey toward resolution; rather, conflict often appears to be the entire point. “Town politics have gotten very ugly,” Farah Ameen, the local parent, told me. “People are attacked. Their families are attacked.”—
Do you see that as a good thing, or a bad thing? Is it what happened?
…Wikipedia seems to skip hastily from 1779 to 2009. Maybe you’re on to something here, Steve.
Or it’s that the people here who “name the Jew” have got on everyone else’s last nerve. Decades of crying wolf can do that.
I’d be considered something of an anti-Semite in the wider world but I find myself taking the other side here. You guys just never fucking stop blaming the Jews for literally everything.
In Salem recently, we met people who not only believed witches were real, but volunteered that they, themselves were real witches.
No shortage of “Boston marriages” around, either.
Back in the early nineties when National Review had just begun its decline, it put out a college guide which included a list of ten colleges to avoid. Amherst made the list. Amherst was already a bastion of political correctness. It had eliminated all curricular requirements, dropped the reading of classics written by dead White males in its courses, and adopted affirmative action in its admissions process.
This was starting to happen all around the country at the time. The rise of Wokeism had its origins in this nineties period. Many of the leftist professors then had been student radicals in the sixties. Earlier radical periods had been the thirties and the early 20th century Progressive era.
Wokeism existed in embryonic form among the early 20th century WASP Progressive types: Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, John Dewey, Herbert Croly, Charles Beard, Upton Sinclair and so on. This was when you first had a rejection of the political system set up in the late 18th century by the Founders.
>Never thought I’d die fighting beside a diversity hire.
>How about, beside a homophobe?
>Aye, I can see that.
Wait till you see what this Joo is doing to Cairo!
——
A. Not much. But still plenty of iStevish content on my YouTube. https://youtube.com/@ydydy?feature=shared
By the way, I admire your sense of loyalty to RKU. I think he’s mad in both sense of the word and that you should definitely go go go away from a site that’s filled with writers and commentators even madder than he is, but I admire your loyalty as a sort that, even if misguided, is still quite impressive.
I can help resolve that last question.
When Christianity was flushed out, it was replaced by turbocharged self realization.
These parents cannot (for most of them it’s too late) self realize into a new persona,
But their kids can, so part of this is the parents thinking that they are doing well by their children by encouraging (deluded) self realization, and some of it is the parents doing it by proxy.
These parents would do less, long-lasting harm to their children if, instead of encouraging this kind of self realization at such an early age, the parents instead relived the sixties and dropped acid and had swinger parties, but (stayed married and) left their kids alone. To be clear, dropping acid and swinging aren’t great ideas either, but less dangerous to the kids than genital mutilation.
Taking your cues from Hanania here?
I can’t even.
But Steve, you forget. New England is the New Israel, Boston the New Jerusalem, and the Yankees the new Chosen People of God’s covenant.
No need to drag genetic Jews into it. The Jew psychosis transmogrifies and transmigrates into anyone that lays a claim to it.
Jews are largely responsible for this shit, yeah. And the fact that they are pushing back now because they are getting criticized on campuses only means that Jews (and Israel) will become as untouchable as all the others in the fringe coalition. That was part of the plan from the get go.
They’re purging the children of the original sin of heteronormative whiteness.
I was in the same headspace in the 70s. Thankfully, I’m still friends with many from that time. They want to maintain the progressive allegiance, but consistently leak worry and woe about the self-destruction of their institutions by the toxic presumption that anyone who disagrees with you is motivated by malice. The only way people can work together successfully is to assume that your comrades are benevolent, absent evidence to the contrary.
I don’t know whether the woke bubble will pop at the national level as a result of the 2024 presidential election. But I do know that it is crippling all of the local progressive organizations (one example – no one who is both competent and sane would accept an executive director position at this point). I’m talking about the people of good will. The remainder of opportunists and mentally deranged can still do a lot of damage on their own.
Samuel Johnson, Rasselas
Steve, I’m guessing you’re being a bit sarcastic here. I’m not from the area, but I have relatives who’ve done family genealogical research so I’m a bit familiar with Western Mass and the demographic history of the area.. I’m mostly Irish Catholic in background, and my forebears settled in Western Mass after arriving in Boston in the mid-19th century. They and other Irish Catholic immigrants got into farming and working in the factories in Western Mass where the American Industrial Revolution started and then spread westward into New York state, the Ohio Valley, and beyond. The factories were set up by WASP businessmen and much of the labor were Irish immigrants. My family line ended up in the Midwest because the entire business and factory uprooted and moved west to set up there.
I have other distant relatives who stayed in Western Mass and have toured the area. Northampton is one of the major towns there near Amherst. Calvin Coolidge was mayor of Northampton. In Coolidge’s day, Northampton and much of Western Mass’s towns were roughly half WASP, half Irish Catholic. There was a WASP side and Irish Catholic side of town in Northampton. And the area was generally conservative as a result: half the area were stodgy Protestants like Coolidge himself, and the other half were Irish Catholic working class types.
By mid-20th century, the area was more Irish Catholic working class after decades of WASP demographic decline. And starting in the 70s, lots of liberals from New York City (including many Jews) and transplants in general, starting moving up the Hudson River valley into places like Western Mass and Vermont. Bernie Sanders would be a famous example. Lots of the colleges in the area like Amherst, Williams, Smith, Mount Holyoke, etc. were no longer finishing schools for well to do WASP types but became more liberal, intellectual, and bohemian. Most of the people in the area now are transplants or from relatively recent arrivals from major metro areas in the Northeast and the rest of the country.
@Corn #14
“I’ve noticed these trans kids almost always have a laundry list of other mental disorders.”
That would also seem to apply to anybody from Amherst.
Sure, but they don’t burn you if you say you’re a witch anymore.
The ‘Boston marriage’ (a 19th-century lesbian marriage, effectively) is an interesting bit of history that shows things don’t always change as much as you think.
Two people with the Mayflower surname Soule showed up in the trans debate in recent years. One was Sarah Soule, a presumably Yankee high school athlete leading a lawsuit in Connecticut against allowing disturbed boys– black boys in this case– into girls’ sports. In contrast, presumably anti-Yankee George Soule at a counter-trans protest a few miles north in Ottawa, says “I’m here because I think we have to protect trans kids and there’s no room for homophobia and transphobia and hate in our society.”
(The original George Soule is not known to have brought any brothers over, so these two can be assumed to be his descendants. This man– as well as his daughter-in-law– had Dutch and possibly Dutch-Sephardic origins. The 0.05% Jewish ancestry would explain everything!)))
You’d think the Canadian, a descendant of those who rejected mad New England ways in 1776, would have the saner outlook. But no, it’s similar to how Scandinavian Lutherans in the Midwest and Northwest are so much quicker than their “New Englander” neighbors to bash the South these days. After all, they were conceived without sin.
It was a bunch of teenage girls in the countryside whom the adults mistakenly coddled. It was put down fairly quickly– it didn’t even reach the Village of Salem. Just the Town.
Too God-fearing? Most Palmettoans would say the problem is the lack of fear of God. But the underlying point is consistent– “Me right, you wrong. Me good, you bad.” Kind of like how blacks think.
It isn’t. It’s in a different county, hundreds of smoots away.
Playing the Jack D role for Puritan-stock Americans is a thankless job, but someone’s gotta do it.
You are now ignoring the buildup of Jewish influence over culture and ideas. You should no longer call yourself the “Noticing” author because you have been self-censoring for some reason on this topic since around 2016.
You can thank tribal jews for pushing mass third world immigration on the United States.
Islam : women :: Jack D : Men of Unz
I like “Supreme Commander.”
It covers most of the bases…
What’s RKU? Google says it’s a university in India. Adding USA doesn’t return anything that makes sense.
Just you wait until the school counselor manages to transition some muslim’s child and then loses a head in an unexplained attack.
In the Fine Tuning of the new Transgender Worship Religion, they are now saying that Black! men (Trans or not) don’t give birth.
Like other tenets of this religion, it is just inferred as being a Revealed Truth.
No explanation needed or offered.
I guess the RuPauls don’t want to go that far…
The ladies weren’t for burning:
(Interesting tidbit from that site: “The Spanish Inquisition executed only two witches in total.”)
Ronald Keeva Unz.
Well, now that you mention it…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yiddish_Book_Center
Established 1980
Location 1021 West Street, Amherst, MA, 01002
I have noticed that when what I laughably refer to as “fascist AM radio” talks about pushback against Israel’s current actions, they always talk about Queers4Palestine. They never mention, say, Due Dissidence or the Grey Zone or Jeffrey Sachs or Judge Napolitano or Larry Johnson or Ray McGovern. Funny how that works, innit?
My sister’s genology research has indicated that one of our ancestors was hanged as a Salem witch.
I can see that. Always troublemakers and asking questions. “Noticing” even…
I hope to visit Salem this summer on a visit.
“Old Family Haunts” as it were.
Another ancestor was an obstreperous Presbyterian anti royalist. Now he was burned at the stake.
Today, instead of capital punishment, you just get banned on Social Media, probably fired, and every loan application you’ve ever used is now being carefully examined by government fraud auditors. “Where were you on Jan. 6, 2021, citizen?”
But better now, not killed. And in our Current Year, being poor and homeless is even considered a heroic virtue. Free debit cards, health insurance and a handy no bail, stay out of jail lifestyle.
If you have kids, they have a ticket into Harvard now…
“In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until The jews moved in and ruined it.”
Steve, this final paragraph suggests that you’re either rolling with the punches with a cute end line or the trolls are truly getting to you. To be frank it was a bit jarring. I implore you not to resort to crude repartee. You’re a much better writer when you stay aloft, unflappable and let the bruisers in the comment section take care of the light work for you.
Did that make you feel better or worse about ducking out on Gaza for the last six months?
So that explains why Amherst was so conservative up through 1979.
Puritanism spawned and split into several sects in New England, Unitarianism and Transcendentalism, prominent among them. Only marginally Christian compared to their great grandparents’ practices, they were quite progressive in their time, and still are. I believe Steve first brought up World War T around 2014. It took off after the Federal legalization of gay marriage in 2015. Now, less then ten years later, with the zeal that Puritans prosecuted witches in a small frontier community, their descendants believe in Transgenderism, a belief that makes witchcraft look like the highest order of science.
Obama’s administration is responsible for sanctioning trans-mania, with the Enda Act prohibiting hiring and employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity and also declaring “gender identity” as a protected class under Obamacare.
Now, what coven of actors are responsible for these policies? Have the ilk of Amherst been moving in that direction for decades or are they just zealous believes of another destructive fad. Could be both.
https://thefederalist.com/2013/11/08/enda-government-identity-crisis/
Yep. The only pronouns that “belong” to you are the first and second person ones that include you as part of the conversation. That’s where the whole “be polite” justification is plausible, because you’re talking to the weirdo to his face
Third person pronouns are referring to an antecedent who is not part of the conversation so he doesn’t have a say because he is not there. Dictating those pronouns is literally trying to control the speech and thoughts of other people.
And the whole use of “they” to refer to a single person is just dumb.
OT:
David Cole’s Twitter account has been suspended. I can’t imagine why. He mostly uses it to promote his Taki magazine articles and lately his attempts to catch a rat in his laundry room. Did anyone see a post he made there that might be what got him banned?
Steve’s throwing punches! You love to see it. Wait, wait, I’ve got it: “woke is the new Christian/Puritan! Hence New England is particularly vulnerable to liberal excesses!” Yes, woke, with its anti-LGBT emphasis, focus on traditional marriage & female chastity, the family, etc is clearly the successor ideology of Christianity. Whenever you see someone espouse that view, you know they’re a real genius of sociopolitical insight.
Salem is crawling with overly serious witches and Wiccans. There is a funny irony that so much of the town’s tourism is a cheeky exploitation of the Salem Witch Trials, yet there are many people who move to Salem to live the “witch lifestyle”. There are some carny level attractions from the 1970s that would constitute a hate crime if witches had protected status.
https://salemwitchmuseum.com/locations/witch-trials-memorial/
The Salem Witch Trials Memorial embodies the cognitive dissonance of Salem. The Memorial features testimonies of the condemned witches where they proclaim that they were wrongly accused good, faithful Christians, but the occult tourists believe that the women were actually noble and independent witches who were killed for practicing their superior faith.
Weirdly, the Salem With Trials Memorial was inaugurated by Nobel Laureate, Holocaust author Elie Wiesel.
400 years ago, New England was founded by neurotic people prone to nutty belief systems. Their descendants have the exact same neurotic mentality, but they have simply substituted something else for the Puritan religion.
The fact that they are slowly breeding themselves out of existence is a good thing. Only the occasional mentally healthy person among them will survive.
People who study evolution understand that most people don’t pass on their genes in the long run. If you’re a neurotic obsessed about your child being misgendered, you’re a fruitcake and a genetic disaster area who won’t and shouldn’t pass on your genes.
Trans kids have high rates of autism and Asperger’s disorder. Look it up.
Unfortunately, conniving parents find it easy to manipulate kids with autism.
Does he use slurs in his tweets? He is fond of them in his work for Takimag.
These people will cut up children till its not cool, and never have a guilty second thought about it once its over.
Remember, kids: Communism=more evil than Nazism.
From Eric Striker’s new Unz piece:
“observe the New York Post’s coverage of the conflict, which is broadly ignoring all of the real news in the conflict in favor of photos of nefarious looking Arab Muslim protesters and blue haired Marxists holding “Queers For Palestine” signs on college campuses. This is an inversion of Zionist Bill Maher’s type of appeal to the left, which dwells on images of protesters waving Swastikas and frames support for the Palestinian cause as a betrayal of progressivism and minority rights.”
“The Jewish figures involved in pushing various shades of this narrative include Constantin Alamariu (“Bronze Age Pervert”), Nathan Cofnas, Paul Gottfried, Curtis Yarvin (“Moldbug”), and so on.”
“one of our ancestors was hanged as a Salem witch.”
That’s nothing. One of my ancestors was drawn and quartered, the last Catholic martyr executed in England.
“Half-Hanged” Mary Webster survived her witch hanging and lived for 11 years afterwards.
https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/mary-webster-witch-hadley-survives-hanging/
https://infogalactic.com/info/Mary_Webster_(alleged_witch)
The fact that that hasn’t become some horror-movie franchise, feminazi book series, or well-known tale is curious to me.
Reasonable minds may differ on the question of exactly when Steve jumped the shark, but it’s definitely been several years so 2016 may be as good a guess as any.
His more recent habit of parroting Jack D is just icing on a cake which definitely didn’t need any.
Yankee Puritans. There’s no living with such people.
I would post agree if the system let me. I could put up with anti-semites if they could occasionally talk about something else.
I stand with the Mexicans and the Blacks on this one. Nothing worse than liberal white women.
The fact that they are not responsible for everything doesn’t remove their faults for lots of things. Who invented the “transgender” stuff, if not Jews? Liberal women are good followers, good sheep, they love deranged ideas, but they usually don’t create the ideas themselves.
However, American Puritanism might be party to blame too (but what is Protestantism if not another Jewish or pro-Jewish movement?).
Anyway, there is something wrong either with Protestantism or with Northern European whites themselves. You see the same thing in Sweden, although perhaps not as bad as in the U.S. But you don’t see so much of this transgender/critical race stuff in Southern Europe. I mean, the government pushes it there too, of course, but most people don’t really buy it. While among Northern whites, they just can’t get enough of it, virtue-signaling like a drug.
Sarah Palin and I can claim Joshua Tefft as an Nth-great-granduncle. He was hanged, drawn, and quartered for treason after King Philip’s War, the only colonial American to suffer that fate. Unless you consider King Philip himself American.
If only. What I find dreary is how consistently there really is a wolf. It becomes noteworthy when there isn’t — and this for a group making up only 2% of the population!
Transgenderism was partly influenced by the Human Potential Movement of the
1960s-’70s. The movement, incl. Yoga, was especially active in California with Esalen as
its epicenter. But what you usually hear from Yoga people is that you cannot
solve your sex problems primarily on the level of sex. They will in fact tell you that
much of our unhappiness and many of our problems result from the fact that
humanity’s inner energy (or life force) is stuck at the lowest levels of our being, i.e.
the lowest three chakras (root, sex, and power). To solve our physical and mental
problems, we need to raise our inner energy (or Kundalini in Yoga theory) to the
higher chakras, namely heart, throat, third eye, and ultimately the crown so
all chakras are open and active.
As a result, yoga people are not terribly enthusiastic about transgenderism.
Their typical answer is that to solve your sex/gender problems, you need
to raise your energy to at least the level of the heart (love) chakra, and
preferably higher. In Yoga theory it’s a trivial statement to say that our inner
energy is a mixture of male and female energies. Some men have an
excess of female energy, and vice versa. That doesn’t mean we need
to surgically refashion our genitals accordingly.
From the point of view of Yoga theory, Christianity’s goal is to raise our
inner energy to at least the level of the heart (love) chakra so we have reverence
for life, and don’t go through life like savages. Ideally, we should lift our
energies even higher, to the levels of the third eye and crown chakras but
those are the levels of saints and enlightened beings, and beyond the
reach of ordinary people. Individuals whose energies have been lifted
to the higher chakras typically have a magnetic, joyful, healing presence
which fascinates people, and sometimes binds them in spells.
If only I cared enough to check.
At this point, it would be funny if 37% or something of the noteworthy strife-makers turned out to be Jews.
It’s possible…
“In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until jews moved in and ruined it.” – Steve Sailer
Never fear, it was New England protestants (Puritans, Yankee Traders) that Karl Marx was referring to when he declared that America was the most Jewish country on earth. Even a minimal insertion of ruinous Jews into the community of Amherst would have constituted a wasteful redundancy.
LOL whut.
Mr. “Anglo-Saxon”, you really should bone up on basic New England history:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem_witch_trials
List of accusers and the towns they lived in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_of_the_Salem_witch_trials#Accusers
Puritan-stock Americans don’t need false narrators like you. Likewise Jack D, by his own example, does Jews no favors—although he appears to think he does.
It’s not going to get better.
Time to vote with your feet. Our forefathers left their homeland for better pastures. You can too. It’s much easier than you think. Your grandchildren will thank you.
I don’t think so. As I said, he mainly uses X to promote his Taki pieces so I felt no need to follow it closely. From time to time he did talk about personal matters, such as his rat battle, and just in the last day, the death of dear friends. He seemed quite depressed and I was going to send him a message of encouragement only to find his account suspended.
Not sure why this didn’t cure all it’s ails.
It would be funny if your doctors used antique forms like “wouldst” in response, but they’re probably too scared to do that.
Dude can’t possibly bring himself to spell out Ron Unz.
It would be funny if white liberals turned woke pronouns into the equivalent of yellow stars for white people.
Great article. Maybe in a stroke of divine providence Lord Jeffrey will return in disguise and distribute enhanced-gain-of-function smallpox blankets.
About 12 days ago, Musk’s Gauleiter banned me yet again. If you’re on the Whitelist, it doesn’t take anything. I was able to get reinstated again tonight, but it’s a major pain in the butt, and they cut me less and less slack.
Under Jack Dorsey, the Gauleiter would shut me down after I’d followed 100 new accounts in a few hours; two weeks ago, it was 20 new accounts in one hour. However, this time they did let me back in.
Under Dorsey, they had this routine, where they’d make you go in circles forever, and ignore any letters to the veep in charge of Siberia.
Why do I care? Because it’s one of the few ways to expand my primary blog’s reach.
Coolidge went to Amherst. It can’t be all bad.
In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until The jews moved in and ruined it.
How much did your Jewish masters pay you for this snarky little comment?
Steve’s next book will be titled “Noticing Everything Except The Jews”.
Was there anything signficant about 2016 that would explain this change?
Steve, you spelled Jews without a Capital J.
Have you become suddenly lower class and uncultured? Surely not!
Is Keeva a Hebrew middle-name?
Excellent comment.
Surely you remember when New England used to be a Republican bastion? 😉
The singular strikes me as a particularly stupid solution to the problem. There is context in which this appeared replacing the awkward he/she referring to an single person where the sex is unknown. This resolves a problem that while merely inelegant in writing is very awkward in speech.
The problem, however, is that in most cases “they” refers to a *generic* rather than a specific individual. As such, *they* refers to a mixed sex group.
I realized this while attempting to resolve the award he/she but avoid the singular they. It is easy to rephrase to speak about the group rather than an individual without changing the meaning of the sentence.
As for APA, https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/grammar/singular-they I have stopped using them as a reference for anything.
I’m currently reading Amity Schlae’s biography on Coolidge. Amherst was quite progressive and there were scandals and lots of gossip when he attended. Coolidge was considered an Outis when he first arrived.
I’ve found New England to be quite conformist and any deviation usually results in a very strong reaction and/or shunning.
It’s the fault of the teachers and the Admin, not the parents or their cultural tendencies. “Boisterous in the cafeteria”, LMAO, I wonder what that consisted of. I would love to have my kids in a classroom with those “boisterous” youth.
Thanks for the insightful post, Matt Walsh/GOP Grifter/CATO Libertarian/Liberal excuse maker, I guess we should just fire all the staff and bring in veterans to control the kids. Because that is what you sound like, Corvinus.
In all seriousness, the reluctance of either side to criticize parents or culture is an ongoing problem.
This isn’t COVID, btw, that’s an excuse. This is 3 generations at the least of liberal permissiveness and, as Steve said, the inability to keep the system going with competing moralities and privileged groups.
All these people sound horrible, both from Steve’s OP and your follow up.
Twinkie,
Republicans in Congress passed the 14th Amendment. Thad Stevens was a Republican. New England Republican from even 1980 is not the same as a boomercon Republican from SC whose family voted Democrat till the 1960’s.
Next you’ll be telling us how Robert Byrd was a Klansman.
Nobody has effectively refuted Steve’s final, very true observation. Unless, that is, they have proof that the Jews got to Dorothea Dix and Horace Greeley.
Maybe a Jew was behind the Oneida Community or the Shakers.
“Coolidge went to Amherst. It can’t be all bad.”
It was probably quite good back in 1894, when he was there. In 1894, when he was a senior, he won first place in a national essay contest for an essay titled “The Principles Fought for in the American Revolution.”
In that essay, he talked about how Americans were transplanted Englishmen. Like the English, they had a strong love of freedom going back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Magna Carta and, as noticed by Tacitus, even to ancient times.
You seldom hear Americans talk about freedom now. Many of the descendants of those transplanted Englishmen have lost that love of freedom and the newcomers from other nations since the American Revolution never had it to begin with.
Obama pushed all this trans crap during his second term because he’s married to Big Mike, and didn’t have to worry about being reelected. Notice how we didn’t start hearing about any of this shit until around 2013?
This is what’s needed for most of these trans kids (trans is the new ADHD these days):
In 2016, Donald Trump decisively defeated the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, thus resolving what had been Steve’s major beef with “the Jews”.
Things happen in stages. The old values have failed as they must, being based as they are in invisible spirits and magical thinking. A new consensus of how to replace them has yet to emerge. A good many of these initial “solutions” are just as absurd as what they claim to replace, but that is how trial and error works. The concern is how the natural course of events is being unnaturally controlled by our oligarchs. They have no principles or ideals, only uncontrollable addiction to the wealth and power our obedience provides them. God help them when the people see the labels they assign us to keep us angry at one another are obsolete – all they really control now is the narrative, but that is unraveling too. The hysterical tone of the lies that permeate our MSM suggest how frightened they really are behind the false bravado.
A few random notes:
1. Steve’s excerpts don’t mention the role of the teachers union, which was important.
2. Some of this stuff played out on YouTube, and something that doesn’t come out in the New Yorker is that many of the black hires were accented first generation adult immigrant Caribbean blacks, not descendants of American slaves, a completely different culture and cognitive level.
3. Ex-MIT computer engineering entrepreneur Phillip Greenspun has been covering the educational insanity of “Maskachusetts” before, during, and after his family’s relocation to Florida. He posts photos from his frequent trips to the state, excerpts from the community discussion boards he still has access to, and analyses of media reports. His blog’s archives contain much hilarity.
Do you know what this –
– is for?
I think Steve’s turn is more recent than that, but don’t track him enough to put on a date on it. My guess is that the eye of Sauron finally got turned on him in the last couple years, and he was either threatened or paid off to get in line. Ron says Steve “lost most of his readership due to a combination of Covid, Ukraine, and Gaza” over the last few years, so I’d guess that’s when they got to him.
Off topic, but some here may find this amusing:
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2024/04/how-dating-sites-automate-sexual-racism/
I guess Steve hasn’t “noticed” that the Jews are a tad busy ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from Gaza to mess with Amherst.
Funny, I remember Steve getting all weepy eyed about the Russians violating Ukraine’s border, but, apparently, the Israelis targeting women, children and aid workers to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza is fine with him.
The great noticer indeed.
New England Yankees are just nuts, and always have been. It’s in their DNA. My guess would be that England rounded up all their lunatics and retards, and shipped them over here on the Mayflower. I live just a few towns away from Amherst, and I can assure you that I avoid it like the plague it is.
Symptom not cause. Sometimes you need to treat the symptom.
You guys just never fucking stop blaming the Jews for literally everything.
It’s a meaningless, fallacious statement and a copout. I don’t blame the Jews for your hysterical comment.
Having known a Unitarian minister, who joked about exactly this sort of thing, I can confirm.
Let’s look at Steve’s track record since 2016:
Trump derangement syndrome
All in on Covid
Putin is Hitler
Gaza, what’s Gaza
And throughout it all, crickets on Jewish power in the US and world.
Now, Steve is admonishing his own readers for noticing what he won’t. The guy is beyond jumping the shark.
Isn’t that precisely what Steve and others have been saying about the woke left for a long time now? It’s pretty much the basic theme of this blog.
Trump and white populism.
Steve is a system guy and agrees with the establishment that poor whites are icky. Steve also considers himself part of the punditry class and thus part of the managerial class, i.e., part of the system. Once whites started to wake up to the fact that are hated by the elite and have no representation, they started questioning the entire system, including which ethnic group runs it.
Steve doesn’t like that. Now, he’s even snarking at his own readers for noticing too much and questioning too much.
Good we need more firearms to make them harder to collect by collectivists.
Interestingly, the original Salem Witch Trials, i great part, resulted from sheltered, gullible White women being influenced by stories that a negro (some say Indian) female, named Tituba, told them.
Steve: In the comments, I hope to see dozens explaining how Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until The jews moved in and ruined it.
Jim Dandy: Hold my beer.
That closing paragraph is indeed the most important. If you cannot discern how utterly polluted Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture has been from its beginning in self-righteous revolutionary fury determined to destroy all other cultures in the British Isles, all of which were far more traditional and conservative, then you are blind.
Those who wish to refuse to see that Wealthy Anglo-Saxon Protestant comes first in Anglo-Zionist Empire and Anglo-Zionism, can take comfort in knowing that indeed, Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was built upon a Judaizing heresy, or to be more precise, a few Judaizing heresies all nicely interconnecting. And, the blazing fact is that almost all Protestantisms born of English ‘reformation’ were from their origins and remain steeped in Judaizing heresies.
But that still makes the first problem WASP, with Jews the logical and inherent add on to the horrors that would come from WASP imperializing.
I like it but the Ye at the end is probably the same as Thee. That Y on “Ye” is actually an archaic letter called a Thorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)
Witches have always been real. They don’t have magic powers and they were not devil worshippers.
More pertinent, whoever could imagine pure blood Anglo-Saxon descendants of 17th century New England Puritans who were wild eyed Liberals (theological, moral, economic, cultural, etc) in the 18th or 19th centuries? No way whatsoever, that Unitarianism, Universalism, Abolitionism and early feminism had anything to do with WASP New England.
I should have said these were puritanical, prudish Yankees. They’ve moved on from the specifically religious aspects of puritanism, but the old traits remain, good and bad. Amherst, while I’m sure a lovely place – tidy, well run, full of bright if misguided people who pick up after themselves – is, outside of the Asians and DEI hires associated with the college, not a big migration destination, like Florida or Texas. And these lineal descendants of the old Yankee class are not the “Just Leave Me Alone with my Guns” crowd like we see in Appalachia or on the western plains. They’re… quirky, especially the women, and can cause a lot of trouble (See Harriet Beecher Stowe).
It’s time people realized where all this comes from, the Tavistock Institute in London which specializes in psy-ops and is the “mother of planned madness.” Tavistock was sterilizing kids back in the 1990s when 100% of Americans would have called that demented and sick. But psy-ops take time to bear fruit, and in this case it took about 20 years.
Now that it’s been normalized in America, the Brits are painting themselves as the arbiters of “reason and moderation”–closing the Tavistock child butchery unit and saying whoa, maybe sterilizing kids isn’t such a hot idea after all. But that’s another psy-op in itself. They see Americans as the ultimate dupes, the cattle who fall for an endless series of “Simon Says” directives from London. They’re having a right larf now as they gear up for a ww3 that they have no intention of fighting themselves.
In both New England and New York during the 1960s , statewide politics about legalizing abortion broke down to: Republicans, led almost exclusively by country club WASPs, were Pro abortion, while Democrats, led almost exclusively by Catholics, usually Irish, were Anti-abortion. Liberal black US Senator from MA Edward Brooke was a Republican.
Does that help you discern things better?
As for that 1980- Presidential election: until Reagan was elected, almost all Neocon Jews – those crazed lovers of perpetual war for perpetual peace and ever greater destruction of the white middle class, were continued either in the anti-Carter fringe of War God worshipping Democrats (such as Senator Henry ‘Scoop’ Jackson) or were still honest about being Socialists (a few still were best known as being anti-Russian Trotskyites at least by family). But Reagan’;s election saw them all start a migration to control Republican foreign policy because they had hated Carter and his foreign affairs so thoroughly because it was based on actual diplomacy to avoid needless war.
Does that help discern anything?
There was a magnitude 4.8 earthquake in northern New Jersey about half an hour ago. We felt it pretty strongly here in southwestern Connecticut. The house rumbled for about 15-20 seconds, growing in intensity and then fading, as if somebody was driving an army tank across the front yard.
Highly unusual for this part of the country.
Must have been caused by all the Jews around here.
“It just occurred to me that after years of being baffled by quotes of a mother referring to “they” of ambiguous number, that we could clear up the grammatical confusion created by this practice by changing the nonbinary pronoun from “they” to a more appropriately reverential “They.” This mother’s child is sacred, better than other children, and deserves to have Their pronoun capitalized.”
One has to engage in mental gymnastics in order to exist in the world of they/them. In order to achieve such an existence, it may be best to first experience the society that Yevgeny Zamyatin discussed in his novel, We. “We need to do something” has been declared. There is only a single/solitary response, “Yes we do.”
Nah, can’t be that.
You’re right, Jews haven’t completely dominated academia and steered it to its present state. Ahhh… you couldn’t help yourself–you just reflexively shouted, “Yes, we HAVE!” Gotchya.
New England was famously the locus of theological liberalism/Unitarianism and rabid abolitionism in the mid-19th century, first-wave feminism during the late-19th century, and have been proponents of each and every left-wing movement since. They’re hardly “suckers” with no volition regarding social ideas.
Included below are all influential old-stock Americans of New England extract who moved America “leftward” on social issues, certainly before those from the pale of settlement were here and influencing American political and social thought. This list could certainly be expanded upon.
Susan B. Anthony
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
William Lloyd Garrison
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Henry Ward Beecher
Lysander Spooner
John Brown
Suffice to say, regardless of the idea, no matter how perverse, these types will promote it if it appeals to their egalitarian sentiments, all the while they enjoy living in a region of the country that is still predominantly white and wealthy. They aren’t gullible rubes; they’re what would have been called heretics in past days who find common ground with the secular Jew not because they’re outwitted by him because they share the same god.
The Narcissism of Small Differences should be added to social surveys and the occasional census. That NSD would spawn new columns, screenplays, grant requests and therapy. Look to Olde England to see how that has led to societal and familial degradation and general unhappiness. Coming soon to a town and campus near you.
Funny enough, Carter carried Hampshire County by 11 points (no doubt Amherst itself was a higher percentage to Carter with the rural parts being dominated by Reagan).
#5 I handle the pre-pro question differently: “My preferred pronoun is ‘fuck’ as in ‘If anyone refers to me as other than ‘he’ I will fuck them to death.’”
#8 Just like there are Marvel Comics people and DC Comics people there are birthing people and spawning people. At least the nice lady got the part about white people right.
#9 “It’s no accident Harvard is in Boston.” Actually that would be an enormous accident since Harvard fucking isn’t in Boston. Don’t be stupid. I feel like you just called me ‘they’. Body like stone, mind like meatloaf. Resist the ass. Happy Cinqo de Culo!
Having a transgender child is like having a vegan cat. We all know who made the decision.
They certainly are not “rubes,” and indeed they have volition, but are you saying that all of their ideas, all of the influences they had on America from its very founding are wrong? “Perverse?”
Do you claim they invented transgenderism? Or, perhaps, is it more likely that in a college town like Amherst, yes in New England, there is fertile ground for wacky ideas and accompanying activism?
You know, I come from Boulder, Colorado, another college town, which is also whacky and fertile for any and every idea. I have news for you, it ain’t in New England, and we ain’t Puritans, but we’re whacky. In fact, since I lived there so long and so long ago, this kind of junk seems almost passé to me.
Good point. Social Justice Warriors, who have drunk deeply from the well of political correctness, have no problem being addressed as “They” just as Jews have no problem being addressed as “Chosen” The notion of being better than everyone else runs very deeply in both groups.
They aren’t gullible rubes
But they are useful idiots.
Wouldn’t that need to be more than one?
I tell a lot of liberal friends (none of whom are Jewish) that when whites become a minority in this country, all of what liberals pushed for will be gone, gay rights, anything with transgenders, possibly even women’s rights.
Maybe it is all collective insanity. No puppet master, no grand design. Just raw, unvarnished humanity when the guidelines of religion and social order fall away.
“Wokeness” transcends actual learning. Woke people will be guided into HR fast lanes, while educated people must claw their way up the ladder, being extra careful not to commit the sin of uttering anything other than the dogma of political correctness. The level field is anything but level.
I blame Samael, the Jew Satan for this hilarious incident.
Jews, no, they’re mostly going to the excellent schools located 90 miles to the east. Lesbians, Hell yeah. Both of Amherst’s representatives in the legislature are lesbians and there are only two men on the 13-member town council. That doesn’t happen without plenty of gray mice in the population. Hampshire County is the Dyke District, run out of Northhampton.
That’s what makes this particular contretemps so wonderful; Steve’s Coalition of the Fringes at each others’ throats.
… so, far from being Judaized, Unitarians are Arian?
Amherst College being 39% white (2021) probably plays a role in that.
https://datausa.io/profile/university/amherst-college
Their graphic includes data back to 2012 (44% white then) and comparisons with all US colleges and US colleges with an arts and sciences focus (63/70% in 2012 and 58/62% in 2021).
BTW, it seems they don’t consider even that diverse enough.
Notice how both whites and asians receive the non-reverential non-captialization there. Interesting.
Surely rampant lesbianism is merely a symptom of civilizational decay manifesting in a general failure of masculinity?
A whole 3% of the voters in Amherst are registered as Republicans. The town also gave Ralph Nader almost twice as many votes as George W. Bush in 2000, 24% to 13%.
Well, the British Empire at the height of Victorianism began moving Third World populations all around its various holdings, to secure whatever labor it wanted. So the elites of WASP empire have a very long history of using Third World ‘migration’ to hold down wages of both Middle Class and Working class whites.
If you still need to see that as occurring only because of Jews, you can remind us that Disraeli was by blood 100% Jew.
Of course, then we must talk about how Jewish bankers had very close to the WASP empire all the way back to the rule of Oliver Cromwell.
Anglo-Zionism.
Thanks. For anyone who wants to see it in context (page 59).
https://www.yorku.ca/inpar/johnson_rasselas.pdf
I kind of like the full paragraph version. Though yours is much more to the point.
In 2018, Steve was still writing articles like this.
https://www.takimag.com/article/enumerating_jews_steve_sailer/
Now he is like Jack D. What happened in the last 5-6 years? Anyone have ideas?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Catholic_martyrs_of_the_English_Reformation#Canonised_on_12_October_1975
(?)
How can I compete on Twitter with my offbeat humour against the likes of Dr. Michelle E. Morse?
Just 8 years earlier:
https://imgs.search.brave.com/tm6evnVxhjIZuFjIxr-iQcgrDyx0Md2LlzjALgjd0YI/rs:fit:500:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9tLm1l/ZGlhLWFtYXpvbi5j/b20vaW1hZ2VzL0kv/NDFZZ3dTcXJweUwu/anBn
“(?)”
[R]es, please find a link which will instruct me on how to compete against Dr. Michelle E. Morse with my offbeat humour on Twitter.
OT — The children of the devil not sending their best — is it plausible that, without vindicating any arguments of anti-Semites, this generation of Jews just isn’t the same as the generation that pulled off the Six Day War?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/05/top-israeli-spy-chief-exposes-his-true-identity-in-online-security-lapse
Yossi Sariel unmasked as head of Unit 8200 after a book he wrote under a pen name lead readers to his actual Google Mail account.
What I don’t get and no-one has ever explained is how it is somehow polite to refer to someone as “he” or “she” in their presence in the first place. Say in a hospital, if nurse X is talking to nurse Y about a patient named John, in the presence of John, then X would surely say something like “John needs…” or if she does not know John’s name she might say “This gentleman needs…” it would be impolite to say “He needs…”.
Well, which is it, Sailer? Do jews have power or don’t they? Because you’ve spent at least a decade pleading/cajoling/admonishing jews to get on board or at least not to resist reasonable immigration policies–the assumption, of course: jews have some power/influence to move immigration policies in a positive or negative direction. In your mind this power/influence seems to be limited bizarrely to a single issue: immigration.
Steve has said he writes about things that interest him where he thinks he has something to say.
Maybe:
1) Steve is not interested in Gaza, and/or
2) he doesn’t have much to add to what’s already been said.
This is all so…predictable. Yet another example of the “well (read: ‘over’) educated” Ruling Class trying to square the circle.
And, not surprisingly, failing to succeed.
John Brown had wealthy businessmen backers. They were literally running guns to Bleeding Kansas. We have real problems, but if people aren’t willing to look at the causes, they will never find a cure.
“But their kids can.”
No, they can’t. No one can.
What you see is what you get, regardless of how hard you may try to “transition.”
OT — [through drywall] STEVE! BAD NEWS, STEVE! SOMEHOW, VLADIMIR PUTIN HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY!

Thanks. That article is a distilled specimen of all the trendy voodoo surrounding Black! studies. Had never heard of “sexual racism” before. The funniest part was the comment, by the head honcho of OkCupid, that those complaining that their matches all were ugly probably were ugly themselves. No doubt true.
They also cause the total solar eclipse on 4.8. The Jew is strong, but God is stronger.
In other words: anarchy.
I think that one is beyond me. How about some links which indicate you should not even try?
That seems to be true, but the estimates are all over the place.
Autism Spectrum Disorder and Gender Dysphoria/Incongruence. A systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313553/
I see your point.
At least she capitalized “White.”
“Maybe full body prostration whenever we say “They?””
Full body prostration needs instruction and practice. While hanging out in ashrams in the 1970’s, I learned the ancient Indian version, which is called “danda pranam”.
The phrase comes from the Sanskrit दण्डप्रणाम and the literal translation is “lying on the floor like a stick while offering obeisance.”
Follow-up to this:
Yossi = Yosef = Joseph = “God will add or take away”
Sariel = “Divine Essence”
“In both New England and New York during the 1960s , statewide politics about legalizing abortion broke down to: Republicans, led almost exclusively by country club WASPs, were Pro abortion, while Democrats, led almost exclusively by Catholics, usually Irish, were Anti-abortion.”
All I can say is that by 1972, Democrat George McGovern , in the not inaccurate words of his opponents, was the candidate of “acid, amnesty, and abortion.” So I think your analysis might be a little flawed. But no doubt some of the country club Rs supported abortion, hell, some of them wrote/voted for Rowe v. Wade.
Shut up, inbred.
Jews and Yankee WASPs share an odd belief that they have the right, indeed the duty, to change the world according to their views. It’s why the hand-off of power from the WASPs to Jews went so well.
Unfortunately, unlike WASPs, Jews are really awful at running the show. They’ve been fully in charge for only ~30 years and they’re driving the empire into the ground.
Some ideas are so insane only an intellectual could believe in them.
The viciousness and hard-assery of 17th and 18th century Puritans is not to be undersold. These fuckers burned witches, slaughtered native tribes en masse, and beat everyone else down with a stick. That’s not to say that much of what they did wasn’t warranted, but to believe those guys were all weak paranoid women cowering at shadows and imagined ghosts is a far cry from the severe masculinity of their actions.
No, it was the fault of all the “Nazis” here! Evil, racist, White earthquake. People of color suffered greater harm, I’m sure.
I stand in solidarity with all those who have declared themselves targets of convenient hatred, with the “hatred” really being more like folks realizing you are a grifter, even as I resent the grift, because “standing in solidarity” is political reiki.
There. I am actually reiki’ing you right now. Can you feel that?
the Israelis targeting women, children and aid workers to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza
Why should women get any special treatment?
The Israelis aren’t starving kids–they’re just shrinking human shields.
WASP Progressivism and the “shining City on a hill” get along very well with idealized Jewish tikkun olam.
A lot of Enlightenment fuzzy thinking and contradictions were baked into the US founding. It’s pretty funny to read the Declaration of Independence in the present day. The Anglo-American nation-state held things together for a long time but now the software no longer matches the hardware. Like the old, obsolete British monarchy, nobody knows how to change it out or what to replace it with.
I missed the part where I shouted that, but you sure play the reflexive anti-Semite just like Steve predicted you would.
Would you say that Claudine Gay was an example of Jewish domination of academia? Liz Magill?
The joke is that those same WASPs can own those “elite” neocons like the Kagans & Nulands by getting them to do their bidding on behalf.
And the real losers are us Americans who are blinded to most/all of this “empiring” by people like the Brits.
Perfidious Albion, indeed.
Where are they “driving” them to? No one, including their good Arab buddies, will take them. They are not going anywhere. The best the Israelis can do is shuffle them around inside of Gaza while they root out Hamas from various cities.
The only one with the intention of doing ethnic cleansing in this region is Hamas who would like do to that to the Jews of Israel. I have absolutely no doubt that if the situation was reversed, not one live Jew would be left in Gaza by now. I’m sure you would weep if that happened, right?
Also back when Assad ACTUALLY turned millions of Syrians into refugees, I don’t recall you getting all weepy about this either.
So… like Portland.
Lord Jeffrey himself has been unpersoned- Amherst College’s sports teams are now the “Mammoths” rather than the “Lord Jeffs”; and the Lord Jeffrey Inn is now the Inn on Boltwood.
This madness has been around here since before we moved to town in 1990. I subbed at the high school and avoided trouble, but when I applied for a permanent job as a History teacher I had to fill out a diversity statement- I knew right then I wouldn’t get the job. I wound up in a more sane district. My 3 boys avoided being indoctrinated, but they were well aware of how nuts many of the staff were/are.
I like my house and street, and most of my neighbors, but sometimes… sheesh. And UMASS hockey team is pretty good – of late they make the NCAAs most years, and even won the title in 2021! And I’m old and resistant to change…
OT:
Couple fights to rid Toronto home of heritage status
Original owner Stapleton Pitt Caldecott was opposed to immigration, historian says
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/heritage-status-home-toronto-caldecott-1.7163883
He’s been foaming at the mouth over “jew-haters” since October 7th and cries over the massacre of the 6 grilling rave attendees. Anybody who calls him out on this (a lot of his readers, most likely) gets a slew of insults or are simply told to kill themselves. He probably promoted suicide one too many times, and that triggers the algorithm. That would be my best guess
The Catholics weren’t numerous enough to impose their will even in the states where they were most prevalent. They needed a significant number of their Protestant neighbors– the ones not in country clubs– to ally with. These were descendants (as were many of the country-clubbers) of the Protestants who enacted the laws in the first place.
Yes, a minority can wield a significant veto power over making big changes in existing law– note that Connecticut and Rhode Island were the only two states not to ratify the Eighteenth Amendment.*
You are also ignoring the important difference between “liberalization”– e.g., the bill Gov Reagan signed and later regretted– and legalization– i.e., ” on demand”, “pro-choice”, “woman’s right to her body”. The latter was still a radical position in the 1960s. Elective abortion was only legal in two or three states when Roe came down from on high. The legislature of one of those states, New York, had just repealed the law, which would have returned to one of the strictest régimes in the land had the governor not flown in from out-of-state specifically for a very public in-your-face veto.
Yes, that governor fits as well as any your cartoon description of New England Republicans. But “Rockefeller Republican” was already current as a pejorative. Not long before, Connecticut had defended, all the way to the US Supreme Court, an 1879 law– i.e., both WASP and Republican– banning the sale of contraceptives.
Come to think of it, the most strongly pro-abortion Republicans were Nelson Rockefeller and his arch-enemy Barry Goldwater.
I highly recommend Kenneth Williams’s Defenders of the Unborn, from Oxford University Press, a history of pre-Roe abortion politics in postwar America. It is very balanced; I read it cover-to-cover, and found no clue to the author’s personal opinions on the subject.
One interesting aspect, made clear in the book if never explicit, is how thinking about the issue broke down so neatly along Protestant/Catholic/Jewish lines, like no other issue. Catholics, whether Latin Mass or Vatican II, were fine with the existing laws; the child had status equal to the mother. Rabbis from Reform to “black hats” saw this status as unequal, strongly favoring the mother. Protestants, whether mainline or “fundamentalist”, were in the mushy middle muddle, worrying primarily about the social effects of changing the law. “Liberalization”, that is, the easing rather than the repealing the old bans, was already making progress in the Dixiecrat South.
*As for the almost-as-radical Sixteenth Amendment, of the five New England states, only Maine ratified it within the first three-quarters necessary. Two others did so later, i.e., redundantly, and the other three demured.
“ The best the Israelis can do is shuffle them around inside of Gaza”
For now. Their final destination will be Jordan, Syria, and/or Lebanon. Either Trump or similar will give Israel a free hand, or it will be abandoned by a Third-Worldified USA under Queen AOC.
Egypt’s rulers will publicly protest but privately prefer to see them “shuffled” away from their mutual border.
We are heading to Genocide.
Great example, Jack. Ever heard of Penny Pritzker or Lawrence Bacow?
Golem-wrangling can be tricky. “Doctor Gay” was an expensive write-off.
Noted as a hot bed of crop eared witch burning fanatics in its early history, New England and places like Amherst have always been at odds with the historic American nation. But, with the Civil War essentially won by New England using the canon fodder of other Americans, they have the largest megaphone. Now, instead of propagating Christ and the Bible, they want to propagate Pronouns and Trannyism.
While it isn’t clear how these contemporary Amherst folk will deal with the revolt of the people of color in their midst to neo-Yankee trannyism, it might help to consider were it started. This trannyism started in Germany, specifically in Berlin. There the first institute was established to study and affirm sexual perversion and then research sex disfigurement, known as the Institute for Sexual Research.
The head of the institute was some Jewish German named Hirschfeld. But his surgeon was a German-Pole, named Gerhbrandt, who has been accused of being both Catholic and Protestant. As well, the Institute’s funding is also mixed with support from both Gentile and Jews. Hitler of course closed the Institute down. Hirschfeld died in exile in Paris in 1935. But, Gerhbrandt was welcomed into the Nazi party and became Chief Medical Doctor of the Dachau Concentration camp. After the war he became an East German commie and Stasi officer.
Other members of the Institute included a Chinese Doctor who later ran around the global weird underground were only spies, criminals, revolutionaries, and occultist hang out. He attempted to establish an institute in Hong Kong using both Chinese and British assets. Don’t know what happened after that. But other members made it to Amherst and Columbia University where they all continued to communicate and collaborate from the works of Hirschfeld and Gerhbrandt.
So, basically what we have here is a bunch of backsliding Protestant descendants of scary Witchburners morphing into Unitarians, then drifting off into secularism, and finally in the 20th century deciding it would be a jolly time to have a bunch of weird Nazis, Jews, and Asians come over to talk about cutting off penises and carving out vaginas. As someone else wrote elsewhere, having purged themselves of Christ, they’ve left a big hole into which all sorts of spirit baddies have entered. Their Hispanic and Black servants however, are not to keen.
The Question now becomes, do we and Amherst owe this new fangled medical philosophy of sexual disfigurement to Jews, Asians, Commies, Nazis, Catholics or Protestants? And do the victims of Dachau get reparations from Jews or Nazis, since both were responsible for creating the medical programs used to victimize so many at Dachau. As to the Neo-Yankees? Clearly they are just a bunch of retards.
The colonists were American, KP was Wampanoag.
Jeez. When I make a serious comment, it sits in moderation for a week. But when I’m obviously busting your chops, it’s like I bought the Jack D Fast-Pass.
Anyway, don’t forget – the Pilgrims hung out in Holland for a while, picking up strange ideas from all the Jews there. Tell me you can’t see the clear link.
The British attempted to get Irish to do the field work in the Caribbean. They all died of heatstroke etc. So the bigwigs decided that niggers might survive long enough in the heat in Jamaica. That was for Sugarcane and to some degree tobacco. Yes that was moving blacks around but it was only moving them from one tropic to another tropic. The British did not move in blacks to Dublin, Cork, Belfast etc. The British did not industrialise the process of cotton with the gin. Even by 1820 the black American population was manageable and effectively throttled with new slaves by Royal Navy patrols from around 1805 onward. The curious overlap between agrarian south and the industrial gin, made breeding blacks profitable for planters in the US. Black population explodes. That was the American republic doing the enblackifacation. A self inflicted wound on all counts.
Christians hold to the “Chosen People” construct as well. But to interpret that as somehow being “better than everyone else” is not only wrong, it would be heretical to most. To Christians, being “chosen” is about noblesse oblige:
For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.
–Luke 12:48, KJV
I’ll let any Jews present explain their own take for themselves. My guess is that almost none of their harshest critics of we meet here are Christian in any but the most nominal sense, so they would not be sensitive to such niceties, if even aware of them.
“The notion of being better than everyone else runs very deeply” in this crowd as well. There is another verse about noticing the mote in the other man’s eye…
She should get rid of her slave name.
She was removed from her job because Jewish billionaires demanded it. Jewish billionaires demanded it because she wouldn’t privilege Jews by shutting down anti-genocide protesters. The Claudine Gay Affair is Exhibit A for the “Jews control the academy” hypothesis.
Instead of denying the obvious fact of massively disproportionately Jewish power the real question is how it is wielded. To what extent are Jews acting as a unified group? And, if they are, to what extent is their group agenda good or bad for the country?
On Israel it’s beyond dispute that they have a tribal commitment to promote its interests over those of the United States. But so what? That’s entirely predictable and it’s only natural that ethnic groups will lobby for favorable treatment of their ethnic kin and homelands. The Jews also rig history and “journalism” around issues they care about, like the Holocaust, alleged “Anti-Semitism,” etc. But how much harm, if any, is this special interest rigging doing to society generally?
Obviously Jews are massively over-represented in the ranks of leftist, globalist intellectuals and activists, and they kinda do control the media. But the gentiles in these positions seem about equally leftist and anti-American. So, assuming one thinks leftist intellectuals are the problem, it’s a fair question to ask whether this is a “Jew problem” or an “intellectual problem.”
The prima facie case for Anti-Semitism is that leftist intellectuals suck, and this group is dominated by a tribe making up just 2% of the population. How could this be without unfair advantages, privileges, and conspiracies at work? It’s the identical logic that the NYT uses to “prove” systemic racism against blacks — i.e., “Blacks are 13% of the population but only 1% of physics professors, so the system must be rigged.”
Both discrepancies are explainable by the HBD effects at the right tail of IQ distribution. But Jewish leftist intellectuals have banned this IQ-based explanation from official discussion. (Oh, the irony). So maybe this should limit their standing to complain that Anti-Semitism is a baseless “conspiracy theory.”
So, they moved away from Dykes only for Dykes to follow them there.
I’ll refer you to Jenner. Lol. Owned again, Jackie boi. In fairness to you, you approach these kinds of discussions like a lawyer who is defending a family member in court. You work tirelessly and do your best to obscure the truth with fallacies and shear loquaciousness, but you can’t just win–because your client is so clearly guilty.
“Oscars so white” comes to mind.
How much of the Academy is Jewish? It’s certainly disproportionate.
The Mayflower Pilgrims had been living in Holland for eleven years prior to setting sail for the Virginia colony, their intended destination. Heavy weather and storms in the Atlantic drove them north to New England, where they settled.
Thank you. I thought about posting the entire paragraph, as well.
One of my all-time favorite books, FWIW. Johnson wrote it in one week.
I’m reminded that many of the people who comment here are…unwell.
The closest Christian equivalent of Hasidics are Pentecostals in practices and Mennonites in dress.
The closest Jewish equivalent of Puritans would be the early Zionists, who left Europe to successfully settle in a promised land surrounded by hostile primitives, and who experimented with collectivism while ultimately abandoning it.
I actually mostly agree with you. The Palestinians would love to ethnically cleanse the Jews from Israel just as the Jews would love to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza and the West Bank.
Not everyone gets it as easy as the Americans with the Indians.
My point was that Steve the great noticer becomes Sgt. Schultz when it comes to certain topics. He’s also a hypocrite who clutches his pearls when Russia invades Ukraine because of sacred borders but has nothing to say about the Israelis trying to push out the Palestinians.
Steve’s the one who brought up that his readers are a bit too concerned about the Jews. Maybe that’s because Steve never seems to notice Jewish power and the use of that power at all.
Quite true. Ethnic cleansing is a dirty business. Nobody gets special treatment.
He’s written about Ukraine and how Putler is a big meanie for violating Ukraine’s borders. Well, what Israel is doing a lot nastier than what’s happening in Ukraine.
Turns out that Steve is just a guy that was willing to talk about group genetic differences. Outside of that rather obvious (but very unpopular) viewpoint, he’s a very mainstream thinker.
Dr. Kopfmender tells me I am making great progress by following her Patient Action Plan.
Spooner was a lefty? How’s that? He was a free-market entrepreneur (private mail delivery, before US President Chester Alan Arthur made it a .gov monopoly) and an anti-authoritarian/abolitionist: a sovereign citizen.
“A man’s natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime; whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, or by millions calling themselves a government.”
― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
“And yet we have what purports, or professes, or is claimed, to be a contract—the Constitution—made eighty years ago, by men who are now all dead, and who never had any power to bind us, but which (it is claimed) has nevertheless bound three generations of men, consisting of many millions, and which (it is claimed) will be binding upon all the millions that are to come; but which nobody ever signed, sealed, delivered, witnessed, or acknowledged; and which few persons, compared with the whole number that are claimed to be bound by it, have ever read, or even seen, or ever will read, or see.”
― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
More:
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/2095916-no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority
Spooner was a libertarian, not a totalitarian, like today’s “liberals”, who have Orwelled the definition out of existence.
As set forth in my X* profile, my first person pronouns are I and me. My second person pronoun is you. There is little need for you to know my third person pronouns, because neither you nor I refer to me/myself in the third person when addressing me/myself.
That’s why I don’t understand what all the fuss is about. If I speak of you in the third person, you’re probably not present to hear me.
But, if you insist, my third person pronouns are he and him.
*formerly known as Twitter
Jenner tells me that she was installed in her job because Jewish billionaires demanded it too. Can’t all the Jewish billionaires get together and make up their mind?
I thought the Harvard Corporation was kind of multi-ethnic, multi-racial group of which Penny was just one member but now I find out that she runs the whole show by herself, except when other Jewish billionaires kvetch to her, then she doesn’t.
https://www.harvard.edu/about/leadership-and-governance/harvard-corporation/
The Men of Unz have this kind of unique sort of vision that when there is a Jew in the room (and things that are bad in their opinion are happening) then everyone (even the President of the United States) fades into the background and you can only see Joos pulling the levers.
You didn’t just figure that out, did you? If you did, at least don’t take credit for it.
This is the internet. A little self-reflection works wonders, my friend. Look in the mirror and ask yourself how much time and effort and thought you give to this place. I have, and I know I am unwell.
And I know that a place like this is a kind of freak show, intellectual porn for self-conscious intellects who want to exercise their big, turgid, throbbing… intellects, while staring at the screen.
At the same time, the internet is the latest and greatest method of communication so far devised by (White) man. Technology is always a double-edged sword.
Keep stroking your intellectual ego, because you are addicted and you have no choice.
Rich Sri Lankan and rich Pak wife buy Toronto mansion for $5 million and are bitching about racism.
Meanwhile house prices and rent are unaffordable for many young Canadians.
Thanks Trudeau for your mass immigration scheme.
Well, since my original comment seems to have taken off down an unintended semiserious path, this might be a good time to mention that for a good chunk of American history, New England Yankees were viewed by much of the country in the same vein as Jews when it came to driving a hard bargain.
https://www.knowsouthernhistory.net/Articles/History/Lincoln/yankee_problem.html
https://thebhc.org/sites/default/files/beh/BEHprint/v026n1/p0027-p0044.pdf
Nah. The biggest movers of population were the Spanish Catholics. They moved orders of magnitude more Blacks than the British. That’s not including the Catholic French. All that movement was done by Catholic Bankers not WASPs or Jews. That continued into the late colonial period as well. The British only seriously attempted to move populations around in the late colonial period in the West Indies and Oceania when they moved Indians to those areas. Oceania stopped it when the British colonial settlers out a stop to it. The West Indian use ended when the planters realized they had moved high functioning high in hard working anti-WASP ethnic-religious bigots into their area and went “ooops.” Anglo-Zionism is not a useful explanation in light of history.
Couldn’t have put it better.
“Isn’t that precisely what Steve and others have been saying about the woke left for a long time now? It’s pretty much the basic theme of this blog.”
It’s not just the “woke left”. It’s also the “pro-whire” crowd who jockeys for position with its own myriad of litmus tests. Both sides are addicted to conflict and reprisal.
Understandable. All the complaining about the genocide in Gaza has made me pro-genocide.
The Ukrainians have not done anything like Oct 7. And no I don’t buy Ron Unz’s fantasy explanation for Oct 7.
No, that Ye is the one used for The:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ye_(pronoun)#Confusion_with_definite_article,_’the’
The personal pronoun ye is the plural of thou, or the informal of you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ye_(pronoun)#Etymology
In other words, sort of like y’all, yinz/yunz, and youse, but always informal. It still exists in Danish, as I. Yes, in that tongue, I means you.
“Marvel not that I said unto THEE, YE must be born again.”
“Forundre dig ikke over, at jeg sagde til dig: I maa fødes paa ny. ”
(John 3:7)
Thee refers to Nicodemus alone, ye to all men.
Thanks for the effort. You’re a mensch.
5-6 years or so ago, he had a whole week of calling out the jews in mostly media in regard to their obtuseness — whether it was taunting or if they just have a blank spot — in power/privelage/punching down, etc.. Bari Weiss, Brett Stephens, etc. I think it was around when Kevin Williamson got fired, which was 2018.
Anyway, it was the most he had ever done it in my (since 2004-ish) years reading him, and the resident jews were flipping out a fair bit. One of the regulars posted a ‘stop trashing my people or else’ type post. Maybe got reminded by his donors who pays for his closet.
When disasters strike, Black! folks are the hardest hit…
☮
That’s no logical conundrum. The boss of an organization will frequently hire someone and then fire them later when they fail to work out. In this case, Gay was hired before Israel invaded Gaza and suppressing chants of “from the river to the sea” became a Jewish priority. She failed on that issue so she had to get replaced by someone who will do the job right. Apparently, the Jewish billionaires have made up their minds. (I didn’t hear about Pritzker complaining about her pet getting canned).
Your rhetorical question to the Semitiphobes (seems like the appropriate nomenclature in this context) is not even framed correctly. Did you even read The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History?
So, because Hamas conducted a successful raid, Israel can blatantly target women and children?
And before you say Israel has no choice, understand that the Americans faced a very similar situation in Iraq and fought the insurgents in Fallujah without targeting the entire population.
Fine, let the IDF crush Hamas, but that’s no longer the point of the war. But, please, keep your head in the sand.
“Trump derangement syndrome”
Trump is a train wreck.
“All in on Covid”
Global health crisis that showed the good and bad in how our institutions managed it.
“Putin is Hitler”
He is a dictator/oligarch who poisons his political opponents and is attempting to destroy a sovereign state.
“Gaza, what’s Gaza”
Yes, Israel ought to be held accountable.
“And throughout it all, crickets on Jewish power in the US and world.”
Yes, we know, Jews are evil. They must be kept in check. It’s why whites can’t have nice things. Yada, yada, yada.
“He’s written about Ukraine and how Putler is a big meanie for violating Ukraine’s borders. Well, what Israel is doing a lot nastier than what’s happening in Ukraine.”
Of course it’s a lot nastier, because what Putin is doing in Ukraine is absolutely swell. Ridding us of neo-fascists and those LGBTQX$@#… rainbow-terrorists all in one swoop. It gets me misty-eyed every time I think about it. When has this hero of Western civilization ever been mean or unfair to anyone? Every hectare of Ukrainian land he swipes is another thrust into the belly of the neo-cons, and if a few more neo-fascists have to die in the process, what’s the harm? Go Putin!
Why can’t Sailer appreciate the keen-eyed and totally objective analysis of Putin’s fanboys when it comes to comparing Israelis and Russians — and also alerting us to the horrors of neo-fascism? You think Antifa and the SPLC are worried about neofascism? Hah! Obviously you’ve never met a fanboy — the rise of neofascism is their #1 concern, and that is why Putin must prevail.
And as for #2 on their list of concerns, why, obviously, that’s the fate of Palestine, and of Muslims in general. Oh, how the fanboys’ hearts bleed for the Palestinians and the totally unfair black eye that Hamas is getting from all the islamophobes, with absolutely no validation from Sailer! It’s demeaning, I tell you — an utter outrage. It’s as if he thinks the fanboys are just crying crocodile tears and putting on an act, and it will not stand.
They certainly tried, though. It was the Madagascar Plan there for quite a while — as I know you recall.
“Yankee Puritans. There’s no living with such people”
So says the southron whose wife is a “Ellis Island American”. Hypocrite.
Okay. I’ll give you that. As often is the case, I see both sides (or more) of this particular situation. Also, Steve and others are correct about some of what they say about New England or Amherst. It’s just as I said, though: I doubt that this place is the cause, and I think certain ideas and ideals that flourished here helped make America what it is (or was until recently.) No. Something else happened… Maybe it was just human craziness when devoid of spiritual guidance, as another commenter wisely hinted. I don’t know, but I won’t knock the good intent of The People.

Gaza is not like Kherson, claimed by and internationally recognized as part of one nation, and subject to an aggressive war of conquest by another.
Israel does not want it, Egypt does not want it, no sovereign nation does. Its undesirable resident savages repeatedly show their unfitness for self governance.
Geography and necessity place the awful and costly burden of governing those barbaric subhumans on Israel, just as we Americans bear a similar unhappy obligation over our 85IQ co-nationals. But, as I said before, Israel can justly, and likely will, foist them on its neighbors who are both better at the dirty work of controlling them, and who bear the guilt of encouraging their violence and futile revanchist ambitions.
The people I blame the most are our own people. They’re the ones who told this Desi couple about “Canada’s shameful legacy of racism”. Getting mad at shamelessly grabby and litigious Desis is like getting mad at raccoons.
Meanwhile, unz-dot-com darling Sasha Baron Cohen is getting divorced from Isla Fisher, and we’re being assured the split was years in the making and therefore it has absolutely nothing to do with SBC’s PR team trying to shut down Rebel Wilson’s allegations.
In keeping with modern traditions, the pair announced the split on yet another their Instagram stories: “After a long tennis match lasting over twenty years, we are finally putting our racquets down…”
And I like ‘shuffling.’ Chasing a million-odd terrified civilians around with tanks, machine guns, an rockets — and shelling them when they try to retrieve food — is ‘shuffling.’
Somebody should ‘shuffle’ you and your wife and daughter around for a few months. You can send me videos. I’ll let you know when I start feeling sorry for you.
Your sock puppet Anonymous[354] says hello. Stay cagey!
Magnitude 4.0 aftershock at 6pm. We were having dinner, and it rattled the big glass corner of the dining room. Cool! Earthshaking! And this just before a total solar eclipse. I love it.
Every once in a while, God spanks us and shows us who’s boss. Bring it on.
Meanwhile, an ounce of gold today will cost you $2,300 if you don’t already own it.
UMASS, Amherst, welcomes you for 95% totality: https://www.umass.edu/events/view-solar-eclipse-umass-astronomy
If the weather looks to be clear, and I’m willing to deal with a million other aggressive, northeastern drivers to get there and back, I might just drive up to some Proximity to the Canadian Border to witness totality.
Maybe I’ll stop in Amherst along the way to see if I can see any trannies, Jews or witches…
The Plan is to send them to Europe and America.
The depopulation of Syria furthers the cause of Eretz Israel and the destruction of The West (Edom).
OT but very important. It appears that Japan is succumbing to the multicult doctrine. Starting with massive waves of foreign unskilled workers.
Japan To Embark On An Era Of “Mass Foreign Immigration”
How does being “opposed to immigration” in 1906 make him a racist? Most of the immigrants in 1906 were whites. Does that make Crazy Horse a racist because he “opposed immigration” into Sioux territory?
It really is funny. Steve ought to be able to get a decent post or two out of it. Maybe he could even review the book.
Steve is hypocrite. Simple as that.
You’re a Jewish nationalist. That’s fine. I understand you. I don’t like you, but I understand you. You have a team. You fight for that team. You lie, cheat and steal for your team because they are your family. I understand that. I’d do the same.
I don’t understand Steve.
You like Steve because he helps your team. I get it. But if Steve turned against your team, you’d turn against him. You have a team. I have a team. Steve feels that he’s above joining a team. He’s wrong.
In my boyhood, there was an all-purpose (and kind of snotty) comeback to any objection. “It’s a free country!”
It’s been a long, long time since I’ve heard anyone say that.
“Let’s look at Steve’s track record since 2016: Trump derangement syndrome All in on Covid…”
Sailer’s problem is that he regards the West, for all its problems, as the better place to be, and may even believe deep down that some part of it is salvageable and worth leaving behind to his progeny.
Whereas the alt-right Jacobins believe that only a purgative fire will save us, and they believe their shamans who assure them that the spirit dance will make them immune to leftist bullets, and that the holy fire will never sear them or anyone they care about. So let it all burn. Mind you, they’d never leave the West, or the comfort of their armchairs and grandmothers’ basements, but everybody else is gonna have to go down into a crisp — it’s for their own good.
Sailer is a gradualist, a Fabian, a Menshevik. The true believers will not forgive him for that. They know that people like that will have to be pushed aside if real change is gonna happen, and they know that this time, the new boss will be different from the old boss and it will all be worth it.
Authority figure in today’s world.
Actually Ukraine killed 15,000 ethnic Russian civilians by shelling Donetsk from 2014 through 2022. And while Oct. 7 was very bad, Israel has been commiting an Oct. 7 every day for 5 months.
There is an explanation for this, but the explanation is extremely long and complex. I am writing an article that will be submitted soon, but I am going to give you the short explanation:
The Republican Party, starting around 1960, has gone way, way to the Right on social issues. New Englanders back then were mostly Republicans, yes, but they were not conservative.
Republican does not = conservative all the time. This is especially true in the northrn part of the U.S. And this is even more true among the educated, wealthy, bourgeoise classes in “Blue” states that voted Republican in the past.
It’s true that the Republican Party, historically, has been associated with the higher socio-economic classes, but this is true only for today’s “Blue” states, and the old Republican Party stook in opposition to both northern progressivism *and* southern conservatives. Republicans back then were basically wealthy Libs.
The current profile of Republican voters is actually much more similar to that of old Democratic voters in the South.
New Englanders were never, ever, ever conservatives in the way that the term is now used. Never, ever, ever. In fact, NE is the historical liberal mecca of U.S,A.
I am going to give you 3 more words for you to ponder: Henry Cabot Lodge.
Yesterday a bolt of lightning struck the Statue of Liberty and today an earthquake rocked the exact same area. (Taiwan had its own temblor just a couple of days ago.) Israel and Iran are on the brink of war.
So is the world going to end on Monday, or what?
Yeah, the lady with the dish rag on her head is the official spokesman for the government of Israel.
1,200 Israelis were killed on 10/7 so every day for 5 months would be 180,000 and not even Hamas can lie that much about how many civilians Israel has killed.
They’re kind of slow learners, aren’t they?
Already, the demographic reality of all the Palestinians who have wound up in America is forcing even the ultimate puppet to mumble about yanking Israel off the American teat.
It’s shitting in your drinking water. But the Jews have no choice. They’re in a morally false position, and it’s reached the point where every direction is down.
Well, don’t spin it out. I want to live to see the end.
You forget that one Jewish life is worth 30 to a 1000 of the goyim (at minimum), so the October 7th attack was indeed much worse than anything happening in The Ukraine.
In fact, as the Rabbinical Sage, Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said at the 1994 funeral of Zionist Hero, Baruch Goldstein “One million Goyim are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”
Alright. Every week for five months.
Makes a big difference, huh, Jack?
…do you win a lot of court cases? I’ve been wondering about that of late.
“Actually Ukraine killed 15,000 ethnic Russian civilians by shelling Donetsk from 2014 through 2022.”
Oh, here we go again with the poor shelled children of Donbass — which is all the Ukrainians’ fault, by the way.
Oh sure, during several months of OSCE monitoring it was determined that 90% of the violations came from the Russian-funded (i.e. non-government-controlled) areas of Donbass, — you know, where the “local heros” like Girkin were running things, but that just shows you how Putin derangement syndrome has infected the West. Nah, it’s all the Ukrainians’ fault. Kinda how it’s all the Ukrainians fault (when it isn’t Nuland’s) that they started yammering about wanting to get into NATO after that Crimea thing (which they started, too, by the way). Here’s what one “hero of Donbass” has to say about that:
But see, it was totally different in Donbass. There, Girkin and the other local heroes (receiving Moscow salaries for some reason) ran a totally standup shop. The fanboys seem to have forgotten about Girkin now that Moscow has arrested him. Strange.
Here’s a little more on what the Ukrainians had to put up with on the wrong side of the Minsk accord boundary lines. But yeah, any trouble in Donbass — totally the Ukrainians’ fault.
My impression is that Sailer’s adoptive parents were Jews, or his birth parents were Jews, or something. My apologies for not being more certain — believe it or not, I just didn’t care all that much when it went by.
Anyway, the point is that Steve would identify as Jewish to some extent — but like a lot of decent Jews, he’s not a JackD. He doesn’t parade his Judaism as a surrogate source of self-esteem.
And when it comes to embarrassments like Israel, he’d rather just not talk about it. This, with other Jews, I have seen before.
There are (to grossly oversimplify) two kinds of Jews: those who find Israel humiliating, and those who revel in it. JackD is an example of the latter — but they’re not all like that.
The Ukraine war is over, at least for Americans. A February 2024 Harris poll found that two thirds of Americans want a negotiated settlement with both sides making concessions rather than helping the Ukraine to win back the parts of the country lost to the Russians.
Most Americans understand that those who want to continue funneling money and weapons to the Ukraine are either weapons manufacturers who want to keep their profits up or people who were unable to leave behind their ethnic feuds when they came to this country. If the Ukrainians want to continue this war they can do so but Americans are moving on to deal with more serious problems here at home.
You are either lying (most likely) or are completely out of touch with Right Wing Jewish politics. Her opinions are not out of line in South Brooklyn or the Five Towns in New York. Maybe in your secular, assimilated circles these are foreign opinions, but that is not the case in Orthodox Jewish America. Zionism has consistently been determined by the extreme.
Israel cannot overlook the opinions of its 20% zealot population. I would say that 40% of the population is sympathetic, but not zealots for the resettling Gaza, and the opposition is not willing to die for their cause, and thus they will lose to the people of passion.
“The Ukraine war is over, at least for Americans.”
That’s right — no chance whatsoever that any additional dime of American money or weaponry will be sent to Ukraine. We’re totally done with that. Finito. Zakonchennyi, even. Keep telling yourself that. No American thinks keeping Putin contained is important for their and their children’s security. They agree with Marjorie and Lauren and Matt and the rest who tell us that Putin is no threat to us whatsoever.
One more thing, while I object to Ms. Weiss’ politics and religious interpretations, I respect her choice in religious head covering and modesty. Calling her head covering a “dish rag” is disrespectful and uncouth.
Maybe 400 of those were combatants. And probably 400 or so of the civilians were killed by the IDF to keep them from becoming hostages. So it’s more like 400 civilians killed by Hamas on 10-7.
Israel seems to be killing about 250 civilians per day, so you have a point. It’s more like one 10-7 level massacre every two days or so, not daily.
“Maybe 400 of those were combatants.”
Weird how combatant/non-combatant distinctions were not even worth mentioning when it came to Ukrainian crimes in Donbass, or whatever. Let me guess — with regard to all the 15K who died there, they were not only totally Ukraine’s fault, they were all non-combatants?
You know, if you hewed to a more consistent set of standards, instead of grasping at any straw and staggering from goalpost to shifted goalpost in a desperate attempt to make a point, your arguments would be more persuasive. Maybe.
***The Israeli military implemented the “Hannibal Directive” during Hamas’ attack on 7 October, killing some of its own civilians and soldiers to prevent Hamas from taking them as captives back to Gaza, according to an investigation by Israel’s leading newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, which will be published in full on 12 January.
As previously reported by The Cradle, Israeli Air Force (reserve) Col. Nof Erez described Israel’s actions on 7 October as a “mass Hannibal” event“ in response to the use of Apache helicopters and tanks. “What we saw here was a mass Hannibal. There were many openings in the fence, thousands of people in many different vehicles with hostages and without,” he told Haaretz.
The revelation that the Israeli military informally issued the Hannibal Directive raises questions about the deaths of many Israeli civilians who were initially presumed taken captive by Hamas on 7 October but whose bodies were later discovered near the Gaza border fence.
Isn’t it bizarre that whatever Israel needs to happen to them to justify whatever they were already planning on doing just happens to happen? They must be the luckiest people in world history.
… Jack, Golda Meir was at one time the prime minister of Israel. I’d post a picture of her shoes but I don’t want the thread to get wierd.
The point isn’t the numbers, it’s that, given the conditions of extreme concentration in Gaza, no one can doubt that Israel is killing civilians as surely as Iran got Gallant.
During the 1800s the area, Upstate NY, Western Mass (the connection to Amherst), was home to numerous successful cults and such. The Oneida, free sex and industrial, community, and the Shakers, zero sex industrial community, in Watervliet, New York. Also Abolitionist terrorist organization, The Secret Six, who financed John Brown’s raid. The Secret Six history reads a bit like today’s Jihadi organizations only with Muslims replaced by Unitarians.
Ganser Syndrome (first explicated by psychiatrist Sigbert Ganser in the 1890’s) is a mental disorder whose main characteristic is: Giving “approximate answers,” all-the-while manifesting the fact that, yes, I understand the question. (Right now you might be thinking, Aha!, the wife has a touch of this. Could well be. But give p her some space, especially if she is good with sauces.) Anyway, it recently occurred to me that while GS has become rampant in US society compared to back in the day, here at iSteve, to our credit, there is nary a trace of it, because; “directness” is the general practice, starting with Steve himself.
You don’t like Ukrainians either and you know it. You just used them as canon fodder to “harm” the Russians. You people are sick.
Mass death of Ukrainians isn’t a bug for you. It’s a bonus.
Do tell? I didn’t know that.
I believe she converted to the Tribe for him. Man, that’s one Jewish Princess I could tolerate, and then some. I wonder if my Catholic God would grant me that if I asked Him nice? I’d be like a drunken colored boy who just got a free bucket of KFC with a set of Cadillac keys at the bottom of it.
BTW: How can you tell when a Jewish Princess has an orgasm?
She drops her nail file…
Right. American Protestants have a fascinating and often lurid history, but nobody is more bored by their own history these days than American Protestants. Jews, in contrast, remain fascinated by Jewish history, so it’s widely assumed today, both by Jews and anti-Semites, that Jews must have done everything big in American history. But in truth they were latecomers and until recently played a fairly small role just compared to, say, Massachusetts WASPs.
I can point them out to you…
And you can come to the high school boys lax game.
The validity of that would depend on what you mean by ‘recently.’
I seem to have encountered another H.A. Covington reader.
Google’s Ngram doesn’t handle well the word “It’s”, but it looks like “It’s a free country” was a 19th Century saying that came back into popularity around 1940. It sounds like something a Frank Capra or Preston Sturges character would say.
“Steve is hypocrite….I don’t understand Steve.”
Hypocrite? No, you got it backwards, as usual. Salier’s problem is actually foolish consistency. And you know what they say about that.
Yeah, he’s always been follow-the-science and go-with-the-evidence. And that’s OK when it comes to things like IQ, because that’s pro-white (OK, maybe not pro-white so much as it is pro-Ashkenazi and pro-Asian, but at least it might be kinda anti-black, maybe, at least at the outset, and being kinda sorta anti-black is even better than being pro-white. Priorities!)
But anyway, when COVID came along, he should have tossed his principles out the window and did what the leftists do when the science doesn’t suit them, which is to scream “fascist” and “science is a tool the establishment uses to oppress us” and stuff like that. Why did he stay the course and refuse to be a hypocrite?
And then, when the stolen election came along, and the alt-right found that it had no real evidence to prove the election was stolen, he should have just repeated “it was stolen!” over and over again like the rest of the alt-right, and just like the leftists who scream “black Cleopatra” over and over and then got a Netflix “docu-drama” out of it. Because that’s how the game is played. Evidence shmevidence — why didn’t Sailer just switch gears?
Moreover, Sailer has for years looked down on leftist rabble-rousing and mau-mauing and the crimes of exuberance it led to in Ferguson and elsewhere, and good for him. But when it comes to the Jan. 6th riots, he should have forgotten all about that and completely changed his tune. After all, when has violent revolution and agitation ever backfired and hurt anyone? Get with the program, Sailer!
And yeah, he doesn’t like it when the US meddles in other countries affairs, and that’s fine. But then, for some bizarre reason, he thinks it’s also bad when Putin launches some boondoggle against his neighbors.
So at least we agree on that. I mean, I just can’t figure this Sailer guy out either. It’s like he has this code or something and just keeps sticking to it. Bizarre!
What are you talking about? Abortion was illegal in every state at the time. Bastardy was uncommon and looked-down upon. Homos were deeply closeted, even Liberace. (He sued a British paper for libel and won a record amount.) No one was allowed to wear tee shirts to school.
Who supported radical ideas such as Prohibition and income taxation, voted for leftist loons like Wilson, FDR, and Stevenson, and never saw a foreign war they didn’t like? That doesn’t sound like my local GOP, nor the people with Trump stickers on their pickups.
“In 1879, Connecticut passed a law that banned the use of any drug, medical device, or other instrument in furthering contraception.” –https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496
And defended it at the Supreme Court– in 1965. Can’t imagine anyone anywhere on today’s political spectrum doing that.
You don’t like Ukrainians either and you know it.
Is that the verdict this week from the fanboys? I’m no longer accused of being Ukrainian and now am accused of not liking Ukrainians? Remarkable 180, there. Things must be getting desperate at fanboy headquarters.
I think you little spinsters need to convene another sewing circle and figure me out once and for all. This flip-flopping is getting tiresome. And as for ME using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder (as opposed to the fanboys cheering on the king of cannon-fodder tactics himself), who are you kidding? I’ve said from the very start — and this goes back to the swipe of Crimea — that if Putin had stuck to his earlier subversion strategy and tried to work out the same deal in Ukraine that he did in Belorussia — instead of giving up like a spoiled brat who upends the checkers table when he loses a game — he could have had all of it, from Kharkiv to Lviv, without firing a single shot, and there’s little the West could have done about that. So that’s on him.
And even now, if the Ukrainians don’t want to fight, and choose to refuse the aid the West gives them and accept Putin’s loving embrace, what am I or anyone else in the West gonna do about that? Invade them? That ship has sailed, I think.
Next time, you maybe ought to think all this through a little better before pressing that “Publish” button.
And we don’t understand you. You keep pushing us to adopt tactics which you pretty much admitted failed when you tried them yourself:
“I never said that I made white identity politics work.” — 9 Dec 2023
“Do tell? I didn’t know that.”
Apparently, depending on how well his PR team can do without making things even worse (which is not very well, so far), he’s about to get canceled for having been a creep to his co-star Rebel Wilson and trying to exploit her Zaftig physique in much the same way he did in the naked wrestling scene with Ken Davitian in the Borat movie.
Creeps — why is it always the ones you most expect?
I will note that in the earlier movie, making fun of naked fat people was considered edgy, daring even brilliant comedy. Times change, I guess, especially when the flab being ridiculed is feminine. Anyway, I guess that means it’s a good time for Fisher to bail. I’m not sure that likening their marriage to a 20-year-long tennis match does either of them any favors. And I’m also guessing the final score wasn’t love-love.
As it turns out, noticing things, even being intelligent, has nothing to do with where your loyalties lie.
Putin is no threat to us whatsoever.
I think Putin is no threat to us whatsoever. Not so much for Europeans. But more importantly, the moment Putin “wins” in Ukraine, Xi will get his green light to annex Taiwan without firing a shot. That will lead to a rejiggering of politics in South Korea and Japan and other Asian countries. That may be the longer-term consequence. In some ways, Ukraine war may be like the 1956 Suez crisis. The crisis itself is forgotten now, but helped rejigger international leadership (from U.K. to U.S.)
Most men are being pushed out from family, the society stance is to take women as first defence when men are the best parental figures
Alot of men are being separated from their children, the women are clearly broken psychologically, we need lawyers and solicitors on our side.
I know my own grand child I love completely and absolutely she’s so funny!
I love her so much I want her to love Bjork as much as I do.
[Smile.]
How can we stand by ourselves when wouldn’t stand by our own?
The world about us is fake and no one stands by anyone.
Parramatta stand by our own.
If fake president/real gangster Joe Biden is about to bring the ukraine into nato, then Putin is about to become a very big threat to us, though not as big as Joe already is.
“What are you talking about? Abortion was illegal in every state at the time. Bastardy was uncommon and looked-down upon. Homos were deeply closeted, even Liberace. (He sued a British paper for libel and won a record amount.) No one was allowed to wear tee shirts to school.”
No, what the hell are YOU talking about? The Republican Party were the original champions of universal suffrage, of minority rights, and they LED THE NORTH IN THE WAR AGAINST SLAVERY. Hmm…I don’t know. Those seems pretty liberal values to me.
I mentioned Henry Cabot Lodge because he is one of the most iconic figures of the old Republican Party, and yet he passed legislation to secure the voting rights of African-Americans back in the late 19th century. Again, pretty liberal!
“Who supported radical ideas such as Prohibition and income taxation, voted for leftist loons like Wilson, FDR, and Stevenson, and never saw a foreign war they didn’t like? That doesn’t sound like my local GOP, nor the people with Trump stickers on their pickups.”
Current Republican votes, like Democrat voters in the South back in the 1950’s are motivated primarilly by racism, xenophobia and dislike for homosexuals.
And just like Democrat voters in the South back in the 1950’s, they are primarilly poor/working class whites without a college education. Understand now, dummy?
““In 1879, Connecticut passed a law that banned the use of any drug, medical device, or other instrument in furthering contraception.” –https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496
And defended it at the Supreme Court– in 1965. Can’t imagine anyone anywhere on today’s political spectrum doing that.”
Connecticut never had racial segregation, or slavery, and was one of the first states to do away with the Death Penalty. Pretty liberal!
Regarding abortion, there used to a religious component to it, and it was one of the few issues that liberals in the past were most similar to conservatives. Regardless, they now overwhelmingly are pro-choice, so your point is moot anyway.
Does this make the people in Connecticut as conservative, as, say, Texans? NO. If you think that, you are an idiot. Do you really think that the people of New England are similar to current states that heavily vote Republican like Texas or Louisinana? FOOL.
The Republican Party was NEVER the “conservative” part. It was the party of wealthy bourgeoise Libs that believed in limited government and economic freedom, but still held Center-Left views on Society., and they stood in oppositioi to both Progressives that wanted heavy taxes on the rich and to conservatives with their ethnocentrism and xenophobia.
My argument stands 100%.
Jessica Winter in The New Yorker writes about an amusing war in Amherst
Lies after lies, character assassination after defamation
No. You people like to imagine that every white person who cares about his own people must be some kind of bigot. You think that the history of white people is sitting around wanting to feel superior to blacks or whoever.
You don’t know anything about us.
No shit sherlock, yes thats Steves point.
Also Hampshire county voted republican in every single election from 1868 to 1928 and then again from 1952 to 1956
“Connecticut never had racial segregation, or slavery, and was one of the first states to do away with the Death Penalty.”
This part is just wrong, and shows you know very very little about American history. Connecticut had slavery for over 200 years, from at least 1638 to 1848 when they passed the legislation called “An Act to end slavery”. There were over tens of thousands of African slaves in total in Connecticut in the 1600s 1700s and 1800s, over a period of over 200 years, including 2,764 slaves in 1790 as recorded on the official 1790 US Census.
Also while it is true that the Republican party used to be RELATIVELY more socially liberal than the Democratic party at certain points in the past its also true that in an ABSOLUTE sense the Republican Party of the 2000s is more liberal than the Republican Party of 1960, which was completely against gay marriage while Trump supports it. In 1958 only 4% of Americans polled on interracial marriage said they approved of it.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/354638/approval-interracial-marriage-new-high.aspx
“And just like Democrat voters in the South back in the 1950’s, they are primarily poor/working class whites without a college education. Understand now, dummy?”
So in other words, their votes, and thus their right to political representation, are invalid because they lack the income and educational qualifications to hold proper views. Sort of like… negroes.
So in other words, you are in favor of laws requiring literacy tests and a poll tax in order to establish the proper, qualified criteria for voting rights. Just like… racist Southerners back in the day. Right?
Yeah, I understand. Dummy.
— signed, a descendant from a long line of “poor/working class whites” who made the mistake of building and creating a whole country for dickwads like you to jerk off in.
Faster, please.
I had heard about Borat being in hot water over that Rebel Wilson thing, but I didn’t know that he and Fisher were divorcing.
She’s a pretty good actress. Check her out in an underrated movie called The Lookout from 2007, where she plays a character called “Luvlee Lemons”. Seriously.
It’s hard to understand coldblooded indifference, but we know it’s out there. Upwards of two percent of the population are sociopaths. Most of them are not violent, many of them are quite productive and some are quite charming. They just don’t have normal human feelings.
Take a guy like Warren Buffett. He’s Awfully Smart and all that jazz. But he’s made it clear he has no loyalty to Whites or even Americans in general. He likes the “system” but couldn’t care less about the people. Real shrewd, coldblooded businessman, unaffected by any sentimental values.
Every group has sociopaths, but other groups police theirs. The ADL brings hellfire down on anyone in their group that doesn’t tow the line. Every Black man needs to be seen supporting his people. Group loyalty is the norm (as you know).
But right now White sociopaths are allowed to be open about their indifference to their own people. This is so much easier than things were for them 100 years ago! Then they had to pretend to be loyal. Now they can claim belief in “higher values” or Christian Missionary work or HBD Technocracy or whatever.
I’m not saying Warren or Steve are necessarily sociopathic, just that they don’t have any particular feelings of loyalties to their own people. And from I’ve seen in life, such people never change.
He’s made it clear he has a team…
“Current Republican votes, like Democrat voters in the South back in the 1950’s are motivated primarilly by racism, xenophobia and dislike for homosexuals.”
Yeah, you’re not worth the paper your pen is soiling with this nonsense.
Yes, it’s a variant of ‘Akiva’, which seems to be the more commonly found form in America, e.g. screen & TV writer Akiva Goldsman (Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, A Brilliant Mind, and many others).
How many dead Gaza civilians is a dead junior Hamas operative worth? Answer: 20
How many dead Gaza civilians is a dead senior Hamas official worth? Answer: 100
While the rest of us ponder the pros and cons to AI, Israel is using it for tracking down members of Hamas through the ‘Lavender’ and ‘Where’s Daddy’ programs.
Lavender is supposedly 90% accurate, but the way IDF acts on the information should make normal people want to throw up.
https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
JONATHAN EDWARDS IN WESTERN MASSACHUSSETTS
Robert Lowell
Edwards’ great millstone and rock
of hope has crumbled, but the square
white houses of his flock
stand in the open air,
out in the cold,
like sheep outside the fold.
Hope lives in doubt.
Faith is trying to do without
faith. In western Massachussetts,
I could almost feel the frontier
crack and disappear.
Edwards thought the world would end there.
We know how the world will end,
but where is paradise……
Well Lowell, being one of those actual Lowells the sort that people joke about, I guess would have known.
Unitarians got their name because they didn’t believe in the Trinity, a belief held by Judaism and Islam. Typically, they also don’t believe in the divinity of Jesus or original sin. A lot of the founding fathers tended towards Unitarian beliefs.
New Catechism question for Abrahamic religions- Is your sex assigned at birth or observed?
Everyone knows that Magnus Hirschfeld was a Baptist from Eufala.
Steve is a hypocrite on Gaza. He decries Russia for invading Ukraine but remains silent about Israel purposely starving and killing women and children in an attempt to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians from Gaza.
Yes, Hamas attacked Israel and Israel has a right to fight back, but that doesn’t excuse murdering women and children.
Steve remains silent. Steve is a hypocrite.
“Both sides are addicted to conflict and reprisal.”
What else is new? Humankind has been beset with “conflict and reprisal” since the first humanoids climbed down from the trees. A dark side of humanity which, so far, has proven to be unavoidable (if not insoluble).
Jews are purposefully trying to starve women and children to drive them out of Gaza. Jews are purposefully targeting women and children with American bombs to drive the still living Palestinians out of Gaza.
You’re fine with that because you’re a Jew, so anything that could be good for your people is good in your mind.
What’s Steve’s excuse?
I say that all the time to my kids…right before I lock them in a cage for disobeying me.
Note to CPS: That’s a joke. I just lock them in cages for fun.
#224 @Pixo: “Israel does not want it” Germany or Florida? Stupid or just new? Israel wants Gaza, it just doesn’t want Gazans.
#109 @Bumpkin:
Let’s look at those supposed reasons:
1. Covid – people stayed home and spent a lot of time on the internet
2. Ukraine – that damn TV news reducing readership!
3. Gaza – something happened in October, more TV news, reducing readership!
Damn TV news seems like it’s on every day these days. ‘Member when the Vietnam War caused The New Republic to shut down? I ‘member. After the JFK assassination no one read a newspaper for weeks. ‘Member?
Weak as water Captain Peacock. In my experience the key to retaining readers is peppering the comments with overly long comments about about the removal of anti-vaxxing posts, comments so long that if you found one in your toilet you’d consider making a doctor’s appointment.
The key takeaway from this article really is that the trans lunacy is alienating blacks and Latinos from the Democratic Party. “Wokeness” is a key reason Trump is doing better among minorities than any recent GOP candidate. The Dems may have thought that bringing in millions of immigrants would lock them in power forever but the opposite is likely the case. They have actually imported millions of people who find trans ideology and homosexuality repugnant, and for whom religion plays an important role in their lives. Most of these immigrants are happy to shut the door behind them, another area Trump actually holds an advantage with “new” Americans but the Dems are too busy talking about racism to actually understand the issue.
“If fake president/real gangster Joe Biden”
Covering up for Trump.
“is about to bring the ukraine into nato,”
That’s for NATO to decide, not simply one country, as well as the sovereign nation of Ukraine.
“then Putin is about to become a very big threat to us”
Putin is a threat to his own people, especially those who dare to challenge him.
“though not as big as Joe already is.”
You really have your head in the sand.
The key takeaway from this article really is that the trans lunacy is alienating blacks and Latinos from the Democratic Party. “Wokeness” is a key reason Trump is doing better among minorities than any recent GOP candidate. The Dems may have thought that bringing in millions of immigrants would lock them in power forever but the opposite is likely the case. They have actually imported millions of people who find trans ideology and homosexuality repugnant, and for whom religion plays an important role in their lives. They are quickly being alienated from the Democratic Party, and the Party activists are too ideological and too busy talking about racism to actually understand what’s happening.
The Republican Party, starting around 1960, has gone way, way to the Right on social issues.
==
Give me a list of Republican pols in 1960 who favored abortion on demand, unilateral divorce on demand, homosexual pseudogamy, unrestricted traffic in pornography, legal sanction for surgical mutilation and hormonal treatments, legal sanction for people who declined to hire or rent to homosexuals, distribution of foster children to known homosexuals, &c. Heck, give me a list of Manhattan pols who favored these things.
It was still common into the 1970s. You never hear it anymore. The right knows we’re not a free country anymore and the left is chock-a-block with professional-managerial types who fancy the lower orders should not have any discretion and with harridans of the sort from whose ranks elementary school teachers are recruited.
The whole Taiwan connection nonsense is an illustration of how totally out of touch are the Green Zone denizens. Yes, China is taking Taiwan. Yes, American failure in Ukraine certainly doesn’t lend confidence to Taipei. But, America already ceded the South China Sea among other waters without a fight. You can stop right there if you’re not a neocon. America has handed China more than enough of our weapons secrets, sometimes through our greatest ally, to render any question of a fight completely moot. Plus Beijing has all but outright said that their plan for Taiwan is gradual insinuation, not Anschluss. Our fighter planes did nothing to stop the gradual economic insinuation China pulled off against us, and surely Taiwan is a simpler and closer nut to crack.
This whole thing is Hitler in the bunker screaming for Steiner.
That’s true, but it’s not as significant as the economy as a factor. We still need something that can neutralize abortion hysteria.
Anecdotally, I can say that I used to hear that expression semi-frequently in the 60s-80s, but no one I encounter (and I travel in politically diverse circles) says it today. Maybe people sense that we are a lot less free than we were just a few decades ago.
“… Ron says Steve “lost most of his readership due to a combination of Covid, Ukraine, and Gaza” over the last few years, …”
If this is true a more likely cause is that his tolerance of mentally ill commenters has driven a lot of his saner readers away.
Part of me hopes you are right, but I suspect that is just an Establishment Republican wet dream.
I don’t recall the source (I think it was a TV show from 30 or so years ago, i.e., MSM) but I am quite sure Connecticut had sundown laws to limit the movement of Blacks!
It does sound odd. There were some Chinese and a few Sikhs even that early but as you say, most were from Europe.
They were crazy. But vicious crazy. Sure they fought with Indians, they fought with everyone.
What would Steve fear more than losing the financial support of his readers, since part of his income comes from his regular panhandling calls?
Blacks and browns see this transgender thing for what it is: an attempt by privileged white people to claim ‘oppressed’ status and horn in on all the benefits that come with that. (There is similar contempt for the notion that rich white women like Hillary Clinton are somehow ‘oppressed’ by virtue of being female.)
Dude, you’re just wrong. If this is your standard you used above (I just don’t care enough to read it) I can see why people disagree with you.
What?
“…Their final destination will be Jordan, Syria, and/or Lebanon …”
That would be foolish. Someplace like Malaysia as far away from Israel as possible would be better if you aren’t just going to push them into Egypt.
Yeah, it’s going to get ugly because these fools think Russia will accept Ukraine in NATO. There must be a group blocking Ukraine from joining NATO. Once it does, Russia will take the gloves off. Ukraine, if it exists will be a purely ethnic Ukrainian state and Crimea to maybe Donetsk will be Russian.
This is highly misleading in that you are adding up the # of slaves who lived over two centuries rather than the # of slaves at any one time, mostly in the Colonial period.
In 1784, Connecticut passed a gradual emancipation law, providing, among other things that newly born slaves would become free at age 25 (later modified to 21). According to the 1840 census , there were only 54 slaves left in Connecticut (inexplicably up from the 25 counted in 1830 – other sources say 17), so the 1848 law was largely symbolic and only affected a handful of people. As a practical matter, slavery was dead in Connecticut by 1820 (97 slaves) if not sooner.
If the South had not rebelled, a similar gradual emancipation scheme could have been passed there and allowed for a peaceful transition over a couple of decades without war or disrupting their economy for a century, but as often happens when you want all or nothing, nothing is one of the possible outcomes.
“Geography and necessity place the awful and costly burden of governing those barbaric subhumans on Israel …”
Strangely enough Israel seems to govern the ones which by a quirk of fate ended up as citizens of Israel without too much trouble.
Any idea who in Japan is pushing for this and what arguments they are using?
This part would be encouraging if decades of experience had not already demonstrated how slippery the slope is.
Something I don’t see mentioned anywhere is that she was the best they could find. I mean, it’s Harvard. The committee had marching orders to find a black chick to lead them and underwent a worldwide search. They had their choice of the cream of the black female academic crop. And she was the best they could do. I imagine the conversation went something like this.
‘Tell us about this Gay broad.”
“Well, she hasn’t really done anything academically and there’s a whiff of plagiarism about her, but she’s black, she’s female, she’s kinda butch, and she’s actually named Gay. Most people will assume she IS gay. A trifecta of intersectionality. And she’s local so we don’t have to pay moving expenses.”
“Perfect. When can she start?”
When I try it I get this message (space between it and ‘s).
The plot I see shows the behavior you describe, but also relatively flat from 1950 to 1980 then increasing and turning sharply upward from 1995 to 2013 decreasing a bit after that.
Except for the small decline during Obama’s second term that seems counter reality to me.
A Google Books search gave this take from a 2005 book (appears to be verbatim from earlier editions).
A Dictionary of Catch Phrases: British and American, from the Sixteenth Century to the Present Day
I find that subtly dismissive (interesting IMO). From lumping it with the freak version (relatively uncommon?) to the ungrammatical example to the proposed ‘pike’ replacement (which does not itself appear in the book).
#289 @Jack D:
Only 97 slaves? Dat am mighty whites of you Massuh D! Dem 97 darkies sho gwine be glads about slavery being dead.
Guess that’s one of those all or nothing deals you mentioned where you imagine stuff. For instance you imagine no slavery and I see 97 slaves. And World Central Kitchen provides a safe working environment.
My grandfather, from Connecticut, was one of the last of the old-line New England Republicans. He never held office but was active in local and to some extent state Republican party circles in the 1950’s and 1960’s. As he lived into his 90’s and was lucid almost to the end I had the chances to listen to his views on political issues and reminiscences about the Republican Party’s past. Based especially on the latter I don’t think his views were in any way atypical of New England Republicanism in the 1960’s and earlier.
What I gathered is that the main positions of New England Republicans of the time were fiscal prudence and small government. Such policies as low taxes, strict limits on public debt and government spending, general non-interference with business, and opposition to the expansion of a more or less permanent politician/bureaucrat class. It’s no coincidence that New England was the last holdout in the US of direct democracy in the form of town meetings.
New England Republicans of the time, in very sharp contrast to the national party today, were not dominated by fundamentalist Christians. I doubt my grandfather ever attended a religious service in his adult life. Social issues were of very much secondary concern and were mostly viewed on a live-and-let-live basis. My grandfather probably never heard of “trannies” but if he did he certainly wouldn’t have cared.
The only problem with your scenario is that it has not taken the trouble of actually happening. Maybe you think that China has already “won” Taiwan, but like Putin in Ukraine, the people of Taiwan still have a vote and they are not going down without a fight.
And so far, Putin in Ukraine has not really given China a path that they would want to emulate. Ooh, can we turn ourselves into international pariahs and lose hundreds of thousand of men in a long and inconclusive war too? Where do we sign up? They might conclude that they were doing pretty well with the status quo and disrupting it would end up making things WORSE for China rather than better.
And the Obama Doctrine that “Taiwan is more important to China than it is to us” is a total dead end. EVERYWHERE is more important to somebody than it is to us. The question is not whether somewhere is “more” important or whether America has its OWN important interests in the Pacific (or Europe or the Middle East).
Obviously if you are one of the 97 that’s not good but 97 out of a population of 275,000 is not a societal problem. There are probably 97 black junkies living in any block of the New Haven ghetto today who (despite being “free”) are worse off than those 97 (soon to be freed) slaves. The gradual abolition act turned slavery into a form of indentured servitude with a time clock on it. 3/4ths of them would be freed within the next decade.
No, I think you have the “all or nothing” problem where 97 or 15 slaves means that “slavery still existed in Connecticut”. For all intents and purposes (except as far as that small handful of people were concerned) it didn’t. If it wasn’t a totally dead institution, it was breathing its last gasps.
You know in advance what people who have team will say.
Steve is worth reading because he does not have a team and so calls each issue as he sees it and does not comment when he has nothing useful to say.
“The Secret Six, who financed John Brown’s raid. The Secret Six history reads a bit like today’s Jihadi organizations only with Muslims replaced by Unitarians”
No, it doesn’t. Try again.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Six
The name “Secret Six” was invented by writers long after Brown’s death. The term never appears in the testimony at Brown’s trial, in James Redpath’s The public life of Capt. John Brown (1859), or in the Memoirs of John Brown of Franklin Benjamin Sanborn (1878). The men involved helped Brown as individuals and did not work together or correspond with each other. They were never in the same room at the same time, and in some cases barely knew each other.
Isn’t it bizarre that to the Men of Unz, all of world history consists of nothing but false flag operations?
Yes, Hamas attacked Israel and Israel has a right to fight back, but that doesn’t excuse murdering women and children.
So women count but men don’t? Go die in a fire, loser.
The term ‘fundamentalist Christians’ does not mean what you fancy it means.
Only some of the pilgrims went to Holland. They arranged for freedom to practice their anti Christian religion in Holland. But when they arrived they ran into the guild licensing and even. a version of labor Union licensing. Freedom to practice their religion but not the freedom to earn a living .
So, Thry were forbidden to set up businesses or practice their trades. After a few years they realized their children would end up as maids in other women’s houses or for the men day laborers begging for work. The pilgrims who remained in England had to rescue them.
That’s what caused the pilgrims to look at the New World. At first they approached the Virginia Company. But unlike the gentlemen of the Jamestown Settlement they read the contract carefully. Work 5 days a week for the Virginia Company 1 day a week for themselves and 1 day a week not working but attending church. A sure route for poverty and exploitation.
So they refused the Virginia Company offer. William Mullins and others sold their real estate and financed the trip themselves.
The original destination was Chesapeake Bay Maryland. But somehow ended up in Massachusetts during the Little Ice Age that didn’t end until about 1850. There’s theories about why the ship’s captain brought them to Massachusetts instead of Chesapeake Bay.
“Were”? Are you writing from the UK?
Utah held the first elections in the world under universal adult suffrage in 1870. Seventeen years later, not happy with the results, a Republican Congress deprived half of Utah voters of the franchise in one fell swoop. Since you are so well-versed in US history, I needn’t explain what this was about, but suffice to say that when those Utahns got the vote back in 1896, the Democrat Bryan carried the state in a landslide.
And how well did that work? You are focusing on one issue, voting and race, which lay dormant for most of the century following Reconstruction.
Michigan has never had the death penalty, Wisconsin used it once, in 1853, Minnesota ended it after a botched 1911 hanging. It continued in Connecticut, at least on paper, until 2015. The state’s last execution took place in 2005.
As for never having slavery, that would come as a surprise to genealogists:
When did we adopt the debate rules of the Oxford Union Society?
Modesty and coverings for the women. Rampant rape of boys and girls plus extensive use of the lowest level street walker prostitutes for the men. A well known sight in NYC is Halloween costume Hasidic men picking up the skankiest black prostitutes on their way home from work.
Checking failure on my part, relied on two claims instead of three sources.
Thanks.
Listen, I don’t ever think that anyone has to be bound to anything, as long as whatever they do, or what they don’t do, doesn’t negatively effect others or (here ya go Dad!) the majority and it’s community.
Okay, so what I honestly think is: Weird, sad people like the one in your video selection, can go on and live the best lives they can, but not while harming the rest of us.
Simple, I know.
Did I notice that HE/(she, LOL) is a Jew? Yes. Okay, so?
Everyone, myself certainly, is working his way through life every day.
Men are men. Women are women. Marriage is a union of a man and a woman. My government, at any level, should only recognize and subsidize: marriage, childbearing/rearing, and joint ownership and estate wealth — jointly owned by a man and a woman married under law. No one else.
I guess I’m a Neanderthal, and I guess this would surprise many who think they know me.
What you showed me is a freak show. I get it. I also am pretty sure that freak has not link whatsoever to Amherst, New England, or even the America that my ancestors conquered, settled and built.
BTW, I just enjoyed a prime ribeye steak, and my wife also enjoyed hers, more rare even (she’s a vampire) grilled by me with smoked wood outside. Excellent, with her sautéed baby spinach, with her farro salad.
This was after a local arborist dropped by to look at a couple of very big trees I might want to cut down.
Anyone know whether usage of “It’s a free country” has/had a regional component to it?
Interesting to see Wikipedia pushing that line so hard (end of the introduction). Especially when the page also contains this.
Sounds rather different. Who to trust: Wikipedia or one of the participants?
August 21, 2017 – total solar eclipse visible over much of the United States
August 25, 2017 – Hurricane Harvey hits Texas; over the next few days, it causes unprecedented flooding in and around Houston
September 10, 2017 – Hurricane Irma hits the Florida Keys; it’s the worst storm to impact that area since 1935
September 19, 2017 – Earthquake rocks Mexico City on the thirty-second anniversary of a devastating quake that killed thousands
September 20, 2017 – Hurricane Maria strikes Puerto Rico; it’s the worst storm to strike that island in decades
October 1, 2017 – Las Vegas massacre; it’s the worst mass shooting in American history
The end is nigh.
He is kind of nuts. Last year he feverishly defended the idea of Mexican white nationalists. How stupid would you have to be to pay taki to read Cole’s junk?
“Steve remains silent. Steve is a hypocrite.”
Learn what hypocrite means, and more importantly, stop being a moron who keeps asking idiotically posed have-you-stopped-beating-your-wife questions and then claiming that any refusal to answer is tantamount to not caring, be it with regard to Palestinians, or the Rohingya, or the Kurds, or anyone else you belatedly and oh-so-selectively shed crocodile tears over (though of course, only if it allows you to needle a Jew or a neocon”).
Your moral indignation act is not fooling anyone who’s paying attention — how do you not get that? And you seriously want to preach to anyone about hypocrisy, fanboy? To the extent Sailer is not chiming in, consider that it’s precisely because every time he sees yet another pathetic alt-right dweeb playing that tired schtick, he’s hit with the ton-of-bricks realization that this is a bandwagon he might want to steer clear of.
Like I said, you’re not fooling anyone.
I’ll be watching.
My old brother-in-law was a pilot from Australia. (I’ve mentioned him.) He had flown fighter planes against the Japanese in WWII. (Yes, he was older than my sister, about as old as our father.) He shot down five Japanese, and he got shot down once himself. (He said he was more worried about sharks than Japanese while he floated and waited to be rescued.)
Well, I got to fly a few times with him in vintage aircraft. That was his thing.
He said to me (I paraphrase now, as best I can): “If something happens and I know I’m going down, and if there is nothing I can do about it, then I am going to watch what happens. I am not going to panic. I am not going to scream. I am going to watch what happens.”
He’d been through enough that I believed him, and I believe his is the best perspective — IF I can live up to it.
“Something I don’t see mentioned anywhere is that she was the best they could find. I mean, it’s Harvard. The committee had marching orders to find a black chick to lead them and underwent a worldwide search. They had their choice of the cream of the black female academic crop. And she was the best they could do.”
I could have saved them a hell of a whole lot of trouble: dudes, just go with CCH Pounder. She plays a smart, authoritative, unimpeachable black woman on TV, and she’s a helluva lot more convincing than any actual black female pig-ignorant racist harridans. Nobody will question the decision — she’s THAT good.
“Take a guy like Warren Buffett. He’s Awfully Smart and all that jazz. But he’s made it clear he has no loyalty to Whites or even Americans in general”
You simply don’t know what you’re talking about.
“In its brief 232 years of existence … there has been no incubator for unleashing human potential like America,” the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway wrote in the letter released Saturday. “Despite some severe interruptions, our country’s economic progress has been breathtaking. Our unwavering conclusion: Never bet against America”
“But right now White sociopaths are allowed to be open about their indifference to their own people”
First, how would you define “their own people”? In other words, what are your metrics for what constitutes a “white person”? Who are “your people”? Please me clear and concise.
Second, what are you doing to stop these alleged white sociopaths? You know, how are you “policing them”?
“You have a team. I have a team”
Your team is outnumbered and outgunned philosophically and ideologically, and for good reason. But by all means feel free to continue to larp about “anti-whites” (whatever that means) and those evil Jews.
Steve’s team is American, a conglomeration of different races and ethnic groups. Always has been, always will be.
Israel can blatantly murder women and children because Hitler!
Have you forgotten the shoes?

Never Again!
☮
Land grabs are always going to be more important to acquirers than they are to us. They are looking to become new owners whereas we’re not even renting.
How about “Hey, you’re free, White, and 21” ?
FWIW I’ve heard the expression “It’s a free country” plenty of times in Canada (becoming less and less free these days of course).
Heck, in 1960 most of those positions would have been too radical for the Communist Party of the USA.
“The right knows we’re not a free country anymore”
How is the U.S. no longer a “free country” anymore? When did this occur? By whom?
See, if you’re going to make such statements, back it up rather than be the (checks notes) typical smug Jew who knows it all. Or is that being anti-Semitic?
The same was true in Helmand with the Marines. We had Female Engagement Teams, usually including a Navy Corpsman and always a female interpreter, who dealt with women and children so no local customs were violated. We worked very hard to establish good relations. The “bad guys” were always a minority in any community, although they often held the inhabitants in fear if not abject terror. By befriending people rather than indiscriminately killing them, we gained their trust and cooperation and they told us who the bad guys were so we could go after them specifically. Even then we had Rules of Engagement stricter than those of any police force in the US. Of course, mistakes were made, sometimes being fooled by participants in clan feuds. But we learned and by and by Marinestan became a peaceful place, all things considered.
I have no moral indignation about Israel and Gaza. If I was Jewish, I’d want to drive out the Palestinians. If I was Palestinian, I’d want to drive the Jews out of Israel.
I understand your lying to the dumb goys. I’d do it too if I was Jewish.
But Steve does have moral indignation about Russia and Ukraine but remains silent on Gaza. He’s the one who brought up that he believes that.his commenters are talking too much about Jews, so pointing out his hypocrisy on Jewish behavior is fair.
We’re replying to his complaint. We talk about Jews, Steve, because you refuse to and their power is very relevant to the issues that Steve writes about.
As to you, you’re just not used to Jews being treated like any other group. It really angers Jews when their lessors get uppity.
Fighting men don’t. Why are you pretending to be stupid.
Some guy long ago had a point about how Jews argue.
“resident savages”
“barbaric subhumans”
If someone were to describe Jews in this manner, you would blow a gourd. In fact, the moderator would not allow the comment to be posted.
No, I do not. But clearly a crucially important question.
More than I ever could, your own words condemn you.
…by the way, you do realize that the one group that is most clearly the descendants of the Jews of the Bible would be the Palestinians?
…your ‘barbaric subhumans,’ as you put it.
All good points–but I would add a fourth.
The transgender ideology is blatant insanity–which makes it ideal for forcing obedience and compliance from the serfs.
Obeying common sense is not true bending of the knee to power.
“If the South had not rebelled, a similar gradual emancipation scheme could have been passed there and allowed for a peaceful transition over a couple of decades without war or disrupting their economy for a century, but as often happens when you want all or nothing, nothing is one of the possible outcomes.”
Wasn’t going to happen just like Israel isn’t going to make all the Palestinians citizens. Slaves were 57% of the population in South Carolina (in 1860) making freeing them a quite different thing than freeing a few slaves in New England.
Weird, Steve usually replies for himself.
But yes, strange area, it’s one of those places where the people who should be Trump voters, however reluctantly, somehow still think it’s the party of FDR and JFK.
So the horologists were doing with their product what the older plantation states were doing with theirs. A big tension in the South arose after 1808. Virginia and Maryland, already well-stocked with Africans, prospered greatly from the “protectionist” legislation of 1808 and 1820. They could demand much higher prices from their hungrier brethren farther to the south. It’s no coincidence that the last two successful smugglings of Africans into the US, the Wanderer and the Clotilda, were connected to Charleston, Savannah, and Mobile.
It’s not highly misleading at all, I explicitly said that as well as gave a number for a specific moment in time on the 1790 US Census day. Anybody who thinks that it’s misleading or gets misled is likely not particularly smart.
The British “solution”, buying off the planters, was a non-starter as well. It took 40% of the Exchequer’s budget one year to pull that off– and those slaves weren’t even present in Britain. Extrapolate the cost to the American situation– 200+% of our budget, taken from the middle class to remunerate the richest men in the land.
What’s 19th-century New England or Midwest American for “Yeah, right”?
Thank you.
They needed a black female with a PhD. No actresses need apply.
March 22, 2024 – Moscow concert hall attack
March 26, 2024 – Baltimore bridge collapse
April 1, 2024 – Israel bombs Iranian consulate in Damascus
April 3, 2024 – Taiwan earthquake
April 4, 2024 – lightning strikes the Statue of Liberty
April 5, 2024 – New York earthquake
April 8, 2024 – Apocalypse (?)
I don’t want to agree or anything — but conceptually, that’s interesting.
How nice.
Except that it’s ‘always has been, always will be…played.’
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the world were the way we would like it to be? But it’s not, you see.
‘
Lol. I would demonstrate — but that would be a really, really bad idea.
You’re like a fanatic Nazi in 1938. ‘What suppression of freedom of speech? I can say whatever I like, and no one minds.’
No doubt, Corvinus.
“You people like to imagine that every white person who cares about his own people must be some kind of bigot. You think that the history of white people is sitting around wanting to feel superior to blacks or whoever.”
I like to imagine? Aren’t you the guy who told us
You know, if you’re trying to skirt suspicions of being some kind of bigot who feels superior to, or else bitter towards “whoever”, your schtick might need a little spit and polish, totally non-bigoted guy. Just a suggestion.
And if you’re really so stupid as to tell me that can’t be bigoted in any way because it’s totally true — and I’m guessing you just might be — then don’t bother. As if that isn’t exactly what every single bigot says.
You don’t know anything about us.
I know you a whole lot better than you think. It’s your lack of self-awareness that makes you think otherwise.
“I have no moral indignation about Israel and Gaza.”
Of course not — you care nothing about how Israel is — how did you put it? oh, yeah — about how Israel is “purposely starving” and “murdering women and children”. No moral indignation whatsoever behind that choice of phrasing.
And then, despite serving us up a heaping helping of that, you presume to criticize the morality of others. I know it’ll be forever and a day before the cognitive dissonance clears up for you, but I’m just gonna put it out there for others who are not as clueless.
“I understand your lying to the dumb goys.”
Yeah, those wretched goys. Everyday I wake up feeling grateful that I’m not in any way one of them. Barukh HaShem.
That’s about as spot-on as the rest of your output.
Communists circa 1960 were downright respectable.
As we learned from the Google AI debacle, it comes down to Garbage In Garbage Out. Still, I have some doubts about this story. It might have been leaked to discredit critics of Israel. An AI killer program named “Where’s Daddy?” seems just too ghoulish to be real.
Are there more reasonable areas around Amherst? The towns in Worcester County are probably more sane at least.
Steve did more than a whole week of calling out Jews in media in 2018. He pointed out in 2017 Bret Stephens called for the replacement of Americans who go back several generations with immigrants. So the torch bearing guys at the Unite the Right Rally had a point.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/bret-stephens-in-the-nyt-not-a-lot-of-self-awareness/
I get it, you are anti-White.
As far as Asians go, I doubt any of them would disagree with what I said. It’s not a “put down”, it’s an observation that they aren’t too concerned about other Americans, including White Americans. Doesn’t mean they hate them or can’t do business with them but as a group, they don’t get too many lumps in the throat over America.
Sailer notices that Blacks have lower IQ. Does that make him a bigot? Because that is simply telling the truth.
Cliff, I have doubts as well. But I doubt the Lavender programs claimed accuracy of 90% – not its existence.
I would also doubt the numbers of accepted ‘collateral damage’ in the Where’s Daddy program, had I not read the Israeli fighter ace Iftach Spector’s book ‘Loud and Clear’.
Iftach Spector was one of the signatories behind the “Pilots’ Letter,” where 27 Israeli reserve pilots and former pilots refused to take part in the indiscriminately bombing of family homes just to kill a single person.
If the story is indeed true (and I’ve only seen weak refusals from the official Israel) it comes too close to resemble ‘die Endlösung’ for my liking.
LOL, it’s okay to attack people as an anonymous coward, something Ron himself does not do do, which, for the record, is one of the many things I find genuinely admirable about him, but if you’re going to call yourself “Dunce Baby”, unless you’re doing an Ebony Obelisk or Tiny Duck thing, you really shouldn’t act exactly like your chosen nom de guerre.
RKU is what Ron called himself back when he was a frequent commentator among us here. Those of us either less “baby” or less “dunce”, either already knew that or at least intuited that I had some reason for calling him RKU without coming to the retarded conclusion that you came to and even unabashedly shared with the world.
If you’re new in these parts maybe you shojld withhold commenting before those who have known Steve for 20 years? Or at least make sure you know what you’re talking about before sharing your wilder paranoias.
If you’re reading Steve because you love “controversy”, there are plenty of better pages for that — most of the offerings on Unz.com for example. But if you’re reading Steve because you enjoy his best attempts at scalpeling unspken truths from the bedrock of bullshit out of which most other commentators carve their edifices then stick around and you’ll get better at “noticing” when there are hidden meanings to be dug up and when you’re digging in barren ground.
I can’t ell one Anonymous from the other. You’re LARPing as Mr. Proudly Stupid why?
I used to date a Japanese/Hawaiian girl whose great-uncle had fought in the legendary 442nd, the heroic “Go For Broke” brigade, the Asian-American equivalent of the 69th, the Fighting Irish.
One time over dinner he was discussing his political beliefs. He said, “Well yeah sure, I’ve got the meatball (meaning the Japanese flag) stuffed away in my closet somewhere, just like I’ve got the doormat (the American flag) somewhere in there too. But none of those fuckers ever did jack shit for me, I was a kid at the time, why do I care.”
It’s a sort of cognitive dissonance how Asian girls will happily screw white guys and live in white countries, while also unthinkingly endorsing every policy preference that will screw over white people, without a second thought. They really don’t put two and two together.
Pursuant to that thought, I’ve come to think that most or maybe all non-whites, without even thinking very carefully about it or even necessarily being consciously anti-white, believe that the unimaginable prosperity created and brought about by whites in the last several generations means that whites must possess some sort of magical endless cookie jar, and that everybody in the whole brown world is entitled to a magic white-people cookie, with no thoughts whatsoever about how or why the cookie was made, or where it came from.
When the Dutch first sailed to Japan, circa 1600s, they brought with them rifles and other guns, which the Nihon-jin had never seen before. But you bet your bippy that the Japanese studied and reverse-engineered those items, and within no time at all, the Japanese were better gunsmiths than the Dutch. It’s why one of my culture heroes is Fukuzawa Yukichi, the practical man, and not Yoshida Shoin, the honorable fanatic.
The West Africans on the other hand, couldn’t be bothered to try and replicate the finished goods which the Portuguese and the Jews had sold them, and so continued to trade in slaves, which was all they had to offer: our present troubles are due to native African laziness, wow who coulda seen that one coming.
In the New World, the Euros brought, along with their new-fangled diseases, large domesticated livestock animals like cattle, sheep, and horses. The native americans took at once to the horses, learned to ride them, and quickly became expert horsemen. Careful industrious builders of buggies and wheels and carriages, not so much.
After Custer’s defeat at the Battle of the Little Big Horn, a reporter asked an Indian warrior how long the battle had lasted. He replied, rather poetically, “About as long as it takes a hungry man to finish his supper.” It’s the kind of neo-romantic thing that Vercingetorix would say to the victorious but methodically boring Caesar. If the reporter had asked a US Army survivor, he would have said, “Well, checking by my high-technology mass-produced watch here, I reckon about 43 minutes.” Criswell asks: Which of these civilizations was going to win?
Who was making these claims? So we can know never to trust anything that they ever say again.
Why would you expect Sailor to pronounce on whether something that never happened is a good thing or a bad thing?
I found this interjection by Sailor interesting. I can’t recall him previously commenting on the wanna-be Nazis who so stink up his threads. I figured that enough of them donate that he didn’t want to bite the hand that helped pay his medical bills, but it seems he’s reached some sort of limit. He even picked up on the tic that is the non-capitalization of “Jews”.
And why are you pretending to ask a “question:” rather than say what you want to say? That’s another sometime-tic of the we-provide-the-Stench types.
“Lol. I would demonstrate — but that would be a really, really bad idea.”
Right, that would take honesty on your part to admit such statements as “The right knows we’re not a free country anymore” and “Except that it’s ‘always has been, always will be…played” is sophistry.
Look, if you’re going to help your people, you can’t act like a hysterical teenage girl. Pull it together.
You guys freak out when the help talks back. You’re going to need to get used to it. Whites are becoming more aware, and the Indians and Asians never were going to treat you special.
Take a deep breath, calm down and re-read my comment. You obviously didn’t understand anything that I wrote because you were too emotional.
“the plan”
You’ve seen the documents leaked from the Minutes of the Council of the Elders of Zion, have you?
Why haven’t I?
Hadley and Belchertown, which flank Amherst, are semi-normal, although the high property taxes in Amherst are driving the moonbats into those places, thus Amherstifying them. Northampton, across the Connecticut River is just as nuts as Amherst, albeit with fewer Negroes and more lesbians.
I taught in a pretty normal 5 town district in Worcester County- although there were few members of the staff who shared my beliefs- the ones that did were mostly tech teachers; in most cases guys who could make a living outside of school. In fact, most of them did work in the trades outside of school.
Just in case anyone is wondering, I was NOT one of those guys who could easily make a living outside of school- teaching was, in the immortal words of Mets’ great Chico Esquela, “berry berry good to me.”
Thanks. The Americans have provided a textbook on how to fight something like Hamas. We’ve even trained the Israelis on how to do it.
But they’re not following that game plan because their main goal is to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza. Hamas is secondary.
Apparently, Steve is fine with this but IS repulsed by what’s happening in Ukraine. Make of that what you will.
On paper, Gay was well qualified both as a scholar and as an administrator. (Modern university presidents are really the latter but custom dictates that they be the former as well. The truth is that these are two different skill sets.)
Gay won Harvard’s Toppan Prize for the best dissertation in political science when she received her PhD. In 2018, she was appointed Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard – kind of like being the governor of a state before you become the POTUS. Her entire career she had received Plaques for Blacks and was being groomed for higher roles. So it was really (literally) a no-brainer to elevate her further. Hell, this worked for Obama so why not Gay?
She would have gotten away with it all if it hadn’t been for those meddling kids. I mean Jews. “The Jews” weren’t responsible for her elevation – it was 1000% in keeping with the way things are done in the modern academy and was almost universally applauded by all Harvard constituencies. But they were responsible for getting rid of her.
The end is always nigh. People have been saying so for thousands of years — as earthquakes, eclipses and wars have rumbled on.
The future’s uncertain,
and the end is always near.
Let roll, baby, roll.
Unless you intended the self-depreciation the word “laughably” doesn’t mean what you think it means.
You are an imbecile. No one on that list is from the 21st Century, or even the second half of the 20th. They and their ethnic group have largely gone extinct thanks to Judaic attacks on White identity and Judaic maniacal pushing of mass immigration.
The funny thing is that Steve is considered a white supremacist or a white nationalist by some, when he is neither. It’s also odd that National Review would reject Steve and VDare would accept him. That seems backwards, at least if you accept NR and VDare at face value.
Or perhaps just a fan of Newhart. The Boondocks animated series referenced Newhart on this as well, with Uncle Ruckus’ brothers.
Steve,
When a corporation does well, the CEO gets a bonus. When it does poorly and bends the rules (and angers enough powerful people) the CEO goes to jail. That’s because when you herald an organization, you take on the responsibility of its impact for good or ill. Mr. Unz himself, along with many others, has determined through observation that a cabal of Jewish ethnic interest has taken up a controlling plurality of powerful people in Western civilization. So even changes which cannot be directly linked to this network of ethnic interest (though the trans agenda absolutely can) should be credited to the overseers of this change, the network of ethnically oriented Jews.
Ask a random Joe if he wants to be President. The answer from most common sense people is “not really”. He mistakenly thinks that the President controls the United States, but he correctly surmises that it is too much responsibility for his comfort and he would inevitably be hated and shamed for any changes made.
People like Ron Unz and Kevin McDonald have proved without a doubt who is running the show. I guess this is one area where you are an Antinoticer. If you like the way they are running the West, just say so. That’s totally valid. But if you don’t like the way things are going, denying your pals, the Ashkenazim, have any power is just childish.
You have made the point that without a catchy name, ideas tend to wither on the vine. I have seen some others use the term “Judenreich.” Is that a good one? Somehow I can picture your index finger quickly hitting the backspace by the time you reach the “n” in Juden.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Are you a girly-boy or something?
There is no sensible criterion according to which Sailor is a “better writer” (at all, much less “much”) if he ignores the stench from the wanna-be Nazis emanating from his comment section.
I see that the last paragraph is much the most commented on portion of this posting, so it seems that I am not wrong to think that this is a new tack from him. I welcome it. The stink had begun dissuading me from coming here, and it would be good if the rat smell diminished somewhat.
Not exactly in the usual sense of that maxim. Which is that if you feed incorrect data into your system, you’ll only get incorrect results, here there’s two types at different times of “data.”
The problem for the Goolag and all the other generally SF/California bay area organizations that can’t stop talking about “AI safety” (albeit, often to suppress competitors, including free and open source and data ones), is that without putting a really heavy thumb on the scales, these “AI” programs trained on real world data would emit crimethink that would get the people responsible for them canceled. For Google, a fair number of years ago their image characterization system had a hard time distinguishing between negro and gorilla faces….
So the “garbage in” is how they take your “prompts” to the “AI” and either intercept them outright I assume, easy to do when you use eeeevil words like “white,” or add extra prompting so almost everything comes out non-white, like that infamous set of Asians, female in one case, and negros in Nazi uniforms, helmets etc.
Would that include, for example, Daniel K. Inouye, who literally gave his own right arm for America?
Can you show us any proof that Asian Americans are less patriotic than any other group? Especially given that America has not always loved them back.
“As far as Asians go, I doubt any of them would disagree with what I said.”
Yet another thing someone who is a bigot would never, ever say. Thanks for convincing us! You’re really knocking them out of the park. And let me take a wild guess — are some of your best friends Asians? Do you maybe even have some Asians in your family? Those are some more oldies but goodies — can’t go wrong with the classics.
You must be new here.
“ the one group that is most clearly the descendants of the Jews of the Bible would be the Palestinians?”
Nope, that would be Samaritans.
Palis are a farrago of Turk, Egyptian, Circassian, Iraqi, Arabian, and Syrian. Now if you just look at upper class landowning families, there will be some highly diluted old Hebrew blood.
However, the ancient Hebrews were almost completely expelled from modern Israel by the Romans. Completely expelled from around Jerusalem, but some allowed to stay, especially farmers, in the Galilee.
“Sailer notices that Blacks have lower IQ.”
As for Sailer, Mr. It’s-not-a-putdown-it’s-an-OBSERVATION (yet another knee-slapper that’s totally not like something a bigot would say), I carefully pointed out to you that Sailer ALSO notices that Asians and Ashkenazi have even higher IQ, which tells me going after blacks isn’t as much the point for him as his leftward critics maintain (or indeed, as some of his commenters want it to be).
I.e., he’s willing to go with whatever is put together — in peer-reviewed detail — by people with fancy schmancy degrees (“experts”, if you will) and to incorporate it into his worldview regardless of whether it aligns with his own biases and prejudices or conforms with the political fashions of the day. I’m no expert on the topic, and find it only slightly more interesting than golf course architecture, but regardless of whether he’s eventually proven to be right or wrong, that’s far more than can be said of the “observations” you scraped up from your backside and, more generally, of the annoying alt-right truthers and purity police who incessantly pop up here to complain how they’re so over Sailer (and yet can’t seem to stop reading him) precisely because he continued to listen to the science even when it came to things like COVID. It’s also more than can be said of his more mainstream critics on the other side of the political spectrum.
I.e., he has a track record of consistency he’s managed to uphold, which is more than can be said of the likes of you.
When we were sleeping, this really happened! I did not even know we have a “mutual defense treaty” with Philippines. That means if China begins a war with Philippines, we have to join the war. No idle navel gazing as in Taiwan.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/wwiii-could-start-philippines-dispute-south-china-sea-china-not-respecting-treaties-expert-says
Exactly, many people are making money off of trannies…Big Pharma, doctors, lawyers, psychiatrists, counselors….In addition to the monetary profits others benefit by using this issue to target conservatives and get people cancelled or even incarcerated for calling trannies by the wrong pronoun. It is another tool by the elites to maintain control and punish dissidents.
I’ve uploaded many bizarre, offensive, and obscene pictures over the years, but the only one that’s ever been removed by imgbb was a side-by-side comparison shot of Jim Morrison and Rush Limbaugh.
“We talk about Jews, Steve, because you refuse to and their power is very relevant to the issues that Steve writes about.”
One of the many downsides of being featured on a site run by a guy who thinks Hitler was “quite reasonable” in his demands to Poland before they ultimately forced him to invade them (as in “Your Honor, I told her to shut her yap twice and go back in the kitchen and fix me a sandwich before I smacked her, so this is really her fault”), and who also stands up for the Holocaust denier who, by the way, also thinks the Nazis maybe had secret bases in Antarctica — not to mention hosting comment sections filled with the likes of you and your fellow crocodile-tear-shedders — just isn’t going to be taken all that seriously when he takes Israel to task, any more than you are.
Maybe when he gets that Substack thing going it’ll be different, but at this point, I’m gonna take another guess and say that hopping onto the ridiculous bandwagon of alt-righters shouting “Free Palestine” (while also salivating over Trump’s Muslim ban 2.0) is not particularly firm ground to take a stand on, at least not while he’s situated at unz-dot-com.
You wrote…
C’mon now. You must be able to hold two ideas in mind at the same time. After all, you are one of those brilliant Jews.
There is no cognitive dissonance between Noticing™ the massacre going on in Gaza and not wanting to welcome unneeded Middle Easterners into MY homeland.
Do you see that? Of course you do, but you and everyone like you uses that fake, logical fallacy. You know, people like you are very good at using logical fallacies to bewilder those masses you preach to.
Ron Unz is a hero with the means. Steve Sailer is a writer in a closet who thinks he deserves more recognition than he does, and he is making his damndest, final push to get it now.
“You are either lying (most likely) or are completely out of touch with Right Wing Jewish politics. Her opinions are not out of line in South Brooklyn or the Five Towns in New York.”
They’re also not out of line with the views of any number of Alabama rednecks, but you don’t have a problem with them, Mr. “I object to Ms. Weiss’ politics”. That’s the issue here.
I have no problem with people being alarmed about Weiss and the not-negligible number of Likud supporters who agree with her but are media-savvy enough to avoid saying so openly. Israeli leftists and even moderates fear her more than they fear Hamas. Moreover, right-wing crackpots are a problem most anywhere they appear, whether the topic is neo-fascism in Ukraine, or Netanyahu’s Amalekite speech, or Dylann Roof’s Charleston — or else, this guy. Clearly, based on that link, I’m gonna say that your concern over objectionable politics is a tad one-sided.
There is indeed a supremacist tinge to the Jewish notion of chosenness, or at least an inherent temptation to supremacism. I’m well aware of the usual retorts about how, no, it’s actually this totally benign thing that means Jews have to be responsible, etc., but we also all know the one about how whenever you have 3 Jews, you’ve got 5 opinions, and some of those opinions are gonna have a much darker view on what chosenness really means, even if those harboring them are too media-savvy to admit as much.
But suddenly deciding you don’t like right-wing kooks on a site filled with conspiracy theories about Jan 6 and stolen elections and triple parentheses is not gonna convince anyone. It’s like suddenly trying to convince us you don’t like neo-fascists whenever the topic turns to Ukraine. Seriously?
And for what it’s worth, the very fact that Weiss has multiple CNN videos readily available to the masses means the J-street isn’t quite as powerful as some people here want to think it is. I’m conflicted as to whether Netanyahu and some of his own Bannons are secretly pleased that someone like her is laying the groundwork that someday can be openly acknowledged (“oh, we tried making that Palestinian Gaza thing work, we sincerely did, but sadly, regrettably, we have no choice at this point, and resettling it is the only viable solution left”), or is outraged that this idiot can’t see that this is not really the right time to let the cat out of the bag.
I’m not taking Israel to task. I already said that if I was Jewish, I’d have given driving the Palestinians out of Gaza a shot. But it didn’t work, so it’s time for Plan B.
Also, Israel and American Jews need to accept the reality that their lapdog is no longer the lone power in the world. You also need to accept that Israel’s neighbors are getting powerful enough to punch back. Finally, you need to accept that you screwed up going overboard with immigration, especially allowing in Asians and Indians. Those other groups will never view you as one of their own. Bad move.
You guys can’t just scream “antisemite” and get your way anymore. The world is moving forward. Yes, you’ll still have a lot of power, but not so much that everyone had to do what you say and never mention that you’re in charge. It’ll take some getting used to, but you’ll get there.
But I think that you’re right. Steve probably should go to substack or somewhere else. Outside of his views on genetic group differences, Steve has become a very mainstream pundit for good or ill. He needs a more mainstream outlet. Maybe he could get a job with one of the Jewish-controlled outfits like the Dispatch or the Daily Wire. That’d be a good fit.
How is any of that inconsistent? Their screwing White men screws over White people as a group. Their living in White countries screws over White people as a group.
I was in the area on Halloween about a decade ago, and stopped by Salem to see what it is like. There was some sort of Italian festival, and the whole place was filled with what looked like Sopranos extras. I went to Arthur Avenue in the Bronx to have some of the pizza that my childhood friend’s father constantly raved about, and Little Italy was about gone. I’ve had better pizza in small towns in the South.
Yup, absolutely. Pretty much everyone in the sales end of the operation, as opposed to the production end, eventually gets a reputation for being greedy bastards (partly because they are, partly because if they’re not, they get driven out of business by people who are). Southern “aristocrats” are certainly in no position to criticize New England Yankees for arbitraging local shortages and getting while the getting’s good. I was merely trying to point out that at one time, New England peddlers had a reputation very much like Jews, insofar as not carelessly tossing around too many nickels. The cite I picked isn’t really the best example, but the internet is so neutered nowadays that unless you’ve got hours to spend chasing down rabbit holes, it’s hard to find a straightforward comparison of the phrases “Jew him down” and “Yankee him up”.
Also, Puritanism in practice tended to emphasize a lot of features characteristic of the Old Testament, such as membership in a chosen minority particularly favored by God, physical isolation from the sinning masses, and heavy stress on the downside of incurring God’s displeasure through disobedience.
I can think of another word that begins “Judenrei….”
Anyone who would use a German word to describe alleged “Jewish rule” of America, after all that happened in Germany, is either a complete idiot or is being intentionally provocative and INTENDS to evoke Nazi terror. Steve is neither.
Part of what makes Steve hard for the mainstream to dismiss (not that they don’t try anyway) is that he is a perfectly reasonable person and not some sort of ridiculous tinfoil hat guy spouting conspiracy theories or using hate words. Jokers who go around saying “Judenreich” are (rightly) instantly dismissed by everyone who is not some sort of true believer already.
Many years ago someone asked Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the head of the Lubavitch Hasidic movement why he (and his followers) wore an ordinary fedora hat and black business suit


instead of the spectacular sable fur hats and silk robes sported by other Hasidic Rebbes.
Why, he was told, if he would only dress the part, he could have TWICE as many Hasidic followers.
He replied that his goal was to return the maximum # of Jews to some form of religious observance and not to gather more Hasidim around him. Wearing a funny hat like that would only alienate secular Jews and make him instantly dismissible by them as some sort of antique fanatic. You are asking Steve to put on the funny hat and he’s not gonna do it no matter how much it pleases you and your fellow Nazis.
“the Indians and Asians never were going to treat you special. You obviously didn’t understand anything that I wrote”
You evidently can’t even get the “you” right — as in, you obviously have no clue as to who I even am — and you’re complaining about not being understood, let alone taken seriously? Look in the mirror, and aim for some basic self-awareness next time, not to mention awareness of who precisely you’re even addressing, and then, maybe your nitwit arguments will go over better (though that’s still a long shot).
So tell us exactly how long we should wait.
I’ve been reading and commenting at TUR since 2015. Didn’t Mr. Sailer decide to move his HBD tree fort here shortly thereafter? In any event, it didn’t take long to figure out that he’s a one trick dissident, stoking & soothing what remains an insular group of disaffected white guys.
You seem like an unusually angry person. Yeah, yeah, I know. You don’t suffer fools, etc. Still, you lash out at everyone who even moderately disagrees with you. Something’s not quite right. I wish you the best.
God be with you.
We interrupt this comment thread for another exclusive Stan Adams special report on the forthcoming end of the world.
At the red light just before getting on the expressway I saw a car with a Jason (the killer from Friday the 13th*) decal.
At the red light just after getting off the expressway I saw a car with a Michael Myers (the killer from Halloween) decal.
This appears to be confirmation that we are, indeed, on the highway to hell. It’s yet another harbinger of doom.
*Technically, Jason didn’t show up until the sequel.
This has been a Stan Adams special report. We now return to the interminable pissing match over the lamentable lack of philo-Semitism among the Deplorable Goyz of Unz.
Some of the weirdos here are attracted to the other writers on Unz. I’ve looked at a few and they appear to be very eccentric and prone to conspiracy theories.
Some of the other writers either don’t monitor their comments or don’t care how crazy and often crude they are.
IAFC was a very common expression heard in the Liverpool, England of my youth, ‘50s – ‘60s, said with a distinctive scouse accent!
You’ve been around here for a while, and you know who writes in good faith and who doesn’t. Allocate your time accordingly.
“You seem like an unusually angry person…”
So says the person telling us that Israel is purposely starving and killing and murdering women and children and then admonishing me for being “hysterical”. So says the person who incessantly hectors Sailer on his hypocrisy and his failure (looks to be about 4 pages worth of search results, so far, or maybe as many as 10, but hey, the night is young), like some jilted bride, and then tells me I seem “unusually angry”. Yeah, as clueless as he is about me — what with me lying to the goys from my Mossad bunker eagerly attempting to get Asians and Blacks to like me, as I keep trying to “run the show” or whatever (how’s that for “moderately disagreeing”?) — he’s now gonna throw “unusually angry” onto that dartboard and see if maybe that sticks.
In any other context, it would be comedic. It almost is, even in this one. Maybe you might consider tighten up your list of suppositions as to what motivates me and how I feel — or better yet, address the longstanding disappointment and frustration with Sailer (that you evidently cannot stop re-hashing) in some more constructive way — perhaps addressing your disappointments and frustrations with yourself and your own life situation — and then get back to us. Clear the cobwebs inside, and then the rest of the world’s motivations — including my own — will likewise be easier to read. The “I wish you the best” and “God be with you” sendoffs might actually seem sincere instead of just passive-aggressive. You know how people around here keep telling the joke about the guy who gets into one fight and brushes it off because he probably just met a jerkwad, whereas the guy who gets into ten fights probably IS the jerkwad, and then pointing at the you-know-whos? Well, maybe try and understand that the reason the Blacks and Asians and those people “running the show” and all the other people out to get people like you is because, well,…work out the rest of that for yourself, Mr. Totally-not-unsually-angry guy who thinks every person he meets means another friendship is about to bloom.
Ah yes the old Moldbugoid diversion: “It’s the Puritans! It’s the Yankees!” (insert parrot squawk)
Have we already forgotten the northern Virginia upper middle class Whites from shitlib/Democrat voting suburbs, opposing trannies and grooming of children in school for transgenderism, at public school hearings several years ago? And having the FBI and cops harass them for their troubles?
But no, blacks and browns oppose this too, so let’s focus on that. The GOP must become non-white to maintain the Finklethink balance between the parties!
Let’s not be diverted from the people who invented this trans crap, and are pushing it top-down from their positions of power in state, economy, media, academia, etc. The Yankees and Puritans in the upper middle class are just trying to maintain their position in society by signaling their compliance to elite ideology. They aren’t driving this. No Puritan ever dreamed up the trans ideology; it is straight from (((Weimar Germany))) (and just what kinds of books were the Nazis burning anyway?).
The Right Stuff dot biz
Justice Report dot news
Antelope Hill Publishing dot com
Hyphen dash Report dot com
Holocaust dot claims
Substack dot com slash at whitepapersinstitute
Substack dot com slash at borzoi
Substack dot com slash at LITTORIA
Odysee dot com slash at modernpolitics
Odysee dot com slash at WarStrike
Odysee dot com slash at MarkCollett
How do you live in a world full of so many White bigots? Must be awfully taxing on you.
Why do you even want to live around us?
Yes, East Asians have a higher average IQ (tilted toward the spatial over the verbal) with a narrower bell curve. They have fewer standard deviations with more people clustered around the mean and fewer at the extremes.
Ashkenazi have an almost opposite orientation toward the verbal over the spatial.
Blacks also have traits that exceed those of other groups.
None of that has anything to do with being against anti-Whitism.
That is not true. “Chosen” means “selected by God” to undertake a risky mission, like Joe Kennedy, Jr. was “chosen” to take off in a B-24 stuffed chock full of dynamite and then parachute from it before it hit its target. This is a dubious sort of honor as Joe Jr.’s atoms might tell you.
Moses is “chosen” by God to free his people from the Egyptians and his response is to argue with G0d (you can tell Moses is Jewish) – I’m not qualified to do this, no one will believe me, why do I have to get the Jews out of trouble when you were the one who got them IN trouble to begin with, etc. (I always wonder about the last one – people are always thanking God who saved them from a flood or something – well who SENT the flood in the 1st place?) . Anyway, all the arguing is for nothing because God has chosen him (and the Jews) and that’s that. And all that hard work and he doesn’t even get to enter the Promised Land in the end. Being “chosen” is not like winning the lottery. Tevye asks God to “choose” someone else once in a while.
“’Chosen’ means ‘selected by God’ to undertake a risky mission,…”
Again, see what comes after that one sentence of mine that you chose to cite, specifically w.r.t. how there’s more than one way to interpret the word, and plenty enough Jews interpret it differently than you do and there’s no point trying to convince me otherwise given what my eyes see. It doesn’t mean your definition is insincere, or even that it’s not the “official” version, but ask people like Daniella Weiss to opine on that topic, then I suspect (again, if they’re willing to forego being media-savvy) they’ll see that “risky mission” you speak of in a far less benign light than you seem to, at least with regard to what it means for those they live with (or in her case, for those who must be — how did she put it? — persuaded to see it is in their interest to want to leave because they can no longer be lived with, or something like that). I mean, she may see that as benign, but others? Not so much.
I’m not saying it’s all that different from making hay of American “exceptionalism”, and plenty of other countries and movements have their own messianic ethos or notions of chosenness or exceptionalism (e.g. Russia, Poland, Ethiopia), but we’re on a site where American exceptionalism is regularly trashed to bits, and that’s fair game, I say, but it means I don’t feel the need to be shy about taking on other kinds of exceptionalism.
Any time anyone thinks, teaches or claims that God Almighty, the very source and mind of the entire Universe, chose them for anything, appointed them to some position or other, risky or not…
Any time anyone engages in that…
Well, what can we say?
Bullshit.
Dangerous, delusional bullshit that risks(!) giving carte blanche to whoever is said to have been so appointed. It allows for anything…
And it has!
It’s amazing how stupid and self-deluded people can be, whoever they are.
To witness you and Rabbi Jack argue about this is funny. Thanks for the laughs.
Namaste. The part of God’s mind within me recognizes and greets the part of God’s mind within you. God chose me to tell you that, right now. Hey, because it popped into my mind, part of the mind of God!
You spend a lot of time arguing passionately on a blog that discusses topics that you supposedly don’t care much about.
Are you just here to counter those pesky white “supremacists”?
Speaking of slurs, the claim that David Cole is “fond of [slurs] in his work for Takimag” is one.
I often disagree with the guy (he IS very fond of policing right wing speech and thought into channels inoffensive to imagined normies) but your claim is baseless, per my memory of his writings.
Whereas in reality the Arabs shooting up music festivals and barbecuing babies aren’t nefarious at all, right?
“…what is Protestantism if not another Jewish or pro-Jewish movement?”
Wikipedia has major faults, but it’s convenient. Martin Luther:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_and_antisemitism
Your handle, Dumbo, is pretty accurate. Ignoramus would be even better.
So, being a hedge fund manager is a “risky mission”? Being a slave dealer or a pornographer (hey, those shiksas won’t just defile themselves) is a “risky mission”? Bilking the US taxpayers out of billions of $$$ every year to pay for your Mediterranean hidey-hole is a risky mission?
Yep, you and Joe Kennedy Jr. — best buddies to the end.
God blessed the Jews with an inability to ever hear what they sound like.
Contra Ancient Briton, King Philip was of course an American. That was the continent he was born and lived on. He was ALSO a Pokanoket Wampanoag. Philip was not, however, drawn an quartered for any reason. He was shot and killed by a Wampanoag ally of the British American colonials
I should have said English, rather than British.
By whom?
Right, the same rich Jew, Pritzker, who financed and promoted Obama for US President also championed Gay for Harvard president. Whatta Cohencidence. It’s rumored Lawrence Bacow and Alan Garber are also Jews:
Elevating Gay to Dean of FAS and then to President of Harvard:
President Bacow
Provost Garber
Harvard Corporation head Pritzker
You write:
So by way of organization exculpatory analogy, no doubt you’d agree with this:
“The Nazis” weren’t responsible for invading Poland and doing the Holocaust—it was it was 1000% in keeping with the way things were done in modern Europe.
Steve Notices things, apparently unlike you. Referring to Jews in lower case is an anti-Semitic tic in these comment threads and he’s picked up on it.
Or 4 years after the 1980 election:



The real kicker, of course, is the change from 1988 to 1992. How does an incumbent who won the first major war for America since Vietnam lose the election to a backbencher from Arkansas that began the downfall, huh?
“You spend a lot of time arguing passionately on a blog that discusses topics that you supposedly don’t care much about.”
As anyone familiar with my ouvre can tell you, I argue mostly about two things, and that’s about it. IQ (or any kind of soft or social science) isn’t one of them — too much noise and too many nonstationary series — and so I’m happy to listen without going through the considerable effort needed to be able to pass sound judgment.
Even with regard to the two topics I do discuss, I don’t flatter myself about possessing any particular expertise apart from having the sneaking suspicion that my typical opponents know even less than I do, and as long as I can rise above that very low bar, and those very ridiculous conspiracy theories and Facebook memes, I have firm ground to stand on, and might even have something constructive to say. That’s one reason I rarely mention Israel, or at least what happens inside Israel. Regardless of which side of the debate one is on, one eventually winds up arguing against people who know the name of this village or that and everything that happened there down to whose grandfather owned which lemon tree.
The downfall of HW was probably due to Israel. In 1991 he suspended loan guarantees to Israel to try to get them to stop building new settlements in the West Bank. But the Israel Lobby was too strong. https://observer.com/2006/07/did-the-first-president-bush-lose-his-job-to-the-israel-lobby/
Arab Twitter. Arab Twitter has been nothing but garbage.
Addendum
I apparently had started reading TUR when Mr. Sailer arrived in June 2014. Here’s some of what he had to say about the move:
But after a decade, a substantial portion of his devotees remain disinterested and even dismissive of the other authors and tend to bristle about other, skeptical commenters that post under his blog.
Clinton in ‘92 got roughly the same percentage of the popular vote as Dukakis in ‘88. Ross Perot was the spoiler.
There is no ‘massacre going on’. There are ordinary military operations going on. If Hamas did not want those military operations, they should have done something else on 7 October.
Three questions:
1. Do you mean “ordinary military operations” as in
• Carthage
• Dresden
• Hiroshima
• Nagasaki
• Fallujah
?
2. Irrespective of what’s “ordinary,” do you support the erasure of the Palestinian people in Gaza?
3. Why do you think that Mr. Sailer’s deep interest in Ukrainian warball circa 2022 hasn’t reemerged here?
So why were you reading it?
Massachusetts WASP Rob Zombie (nee Robert Cummings) remembers his forebears’ lurid past.
It’s usually described as an East Asian tilt toward visuospatial and quantitative over verbal, but there is an exception – Koreans: https://snowdentodd.substack.com/p/did-an-alphabet-make-korea-more-verbal
This is often asserted, but there are contradictory evidences.
Nazism was a political party, not an ethnicity or a religion. Hitler was an Austrian Catholic but the Holocaust was also perpetrated by German Lutherans, Ukrainian Orthodox, etc. It was not an exclusively Austrian Catholic endeavor any more than Harvard is an exclusively Jewish enterprise because of Penny Pritzker.
In the distant past, that may have been true. Only an idiot would believe it now.
https://redstate.com/brutalbrittany/2024/04/07/hotbed-of-hate-dearborns-al-quds-day-rally-features-death-to-america-chants-n2172451
There will be blood.
Does this mean Joe Jr.’s fellow pilots who were not chosen for this mission are also unclean as non-Jews are under Judaism?
You must really think non-Jews are morons.
Non-Jews are not “unclean”. As long as non-Jews abide by the “Noahide Laws” (which are a sort of basic threshold of civilized behavior) non-Jews are entitled to extensive protection under Jewish law, just as non-citizens are entitled to many (but not all) legal protections under Western law.
https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/research_sites/cjl/texts/cjrelations/resources/sourcebook/Noahide_covenant.htm#:~:text=The%20descendants%20of%20Noah%20were,blood%20of%20a%20living%20animal.
Irrelevant to the analogy.
The principal executives responsible for deciding to invade Poland and do the Holocaust were either Nazis or not. The principal executives responsible for promoting Claudine Gay are either Jews or not.
Are you claiming Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber are not Jews?
Just want to compliment Steve on pulling a really nice Dock Ellis with this post. For those readers who were not baseball addicted in their misspent youths, Dock Ellis was a black pitcher who was having a pretty good year in 1971. 1971 also happened to be the year Vida Blue burst onto the scene with a spectacular rookie year, and was clearly going to be the American League’s starting pitcher in the All-Star game (the first black pitcher to start the AS game for either league). Ellis began a media campaign about racism in baseball, stating “Ain’t no way they going to start two brothers”, thereby guaranteeing that the National League would be forced to start him in order to refute charges of racism. Steve, in a post about typical New England dyke lunacy, threw out a totally gratuitous snark about comments tending to evolve into arguments over Jews, thereby guaranteeing that this particular comment thread would do exactly that.
Later, Ellis went on to pitch a no-hitter (with 8 walks) while on LSD, so we’ll see how far Steve decides to take this.
Hitler was not a Catholic communicant.
I’d say it was highly relevant. Naziism is an ideology just like Woke Liberalism. Many (but not all) of the people who subscribed to Nazism were German Protestants but Nazism and German Protestantism are not synonymous, just as Woke Liberalism is not the same thing as Judaism.
What if I told you that Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber were all left handed – does this implicate all left handed people?
Are you claiming that Hitler was not an Austrian Catholic? Does this implicate all Austrian Catholics in Nazi crimes?
Are you claiming Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber exercise sole control over Harvard and that there are no non-Jews involved in running it?
Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber are Jewish AFAIK but you seize upon that to draw conclusions that are not supported by logic.
Hitler was raised as a Catholic.
How often do you think that Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber attend synagogue?
In Jenner’s view, the taint is in the blood so whether they are “in communion” with the Jewish church makes no difference to him and by the same standard, Hitler could not lose his identity as an Austrian Catholic no matter how much he personally tried to distance himself from it. Jenner has already told us that Marx was still a Jew despite being baptized at birth. Hitler’s association with Catholicism certain lasted longer than Marx’s affiliation with Judaism (which was none).
On behalf of the Deplorable Goyz of Unz, I beseech you to find me worthy of your protection and sustenance.
“Nazism was a political party, not an ethnicity or a religion.”
You are absolutely right. Exactly why calling anyone born in the USA a nazi is the sign of a lazy minded dimwit.
If left-handed people were disproportionately (population-wise) in power consistently over time doing generally sinister things politically (within companies, organizations, and government) with that power, of course it would implicate all left-handed people as a group. With the caveat that not all left-handed individuals are bad. But it should be acceptable to identify and criticize a group in general if the group in aggregate is generally sinister and malevolent in action. Do you disagree? You seem to have no problem criticizing Blacks as a group.
LOL. Yes, that would be the way to bet if ‘unsure’ hahahaha
No. The question was did Jews (notevery Jew on the planet, but Jews in executive power at Harvard) elevate Gay to her lofty positions at Harvard? Obviously, yes. As I’ve cited, the principal executives who did so were Jews.
It’s a simple matter of fact: Either you admit the ones in charge at Harvard who promoted Gay are Jews, or you pretend they are not, or pretend they had no responsible agency (just following orders?). If they were in charge, and are Jews, then Jews (not your straw man “The Jews”) are responsible for her position as Harvard president.
Black-criminal-sympathizing “They dindu nuffin’!” Blacks have nothing on you.
You might recognize this famous quote:
So you agree with Goebbels then? I don’t think that many Genuine Americans agree with Joe Goebbels but apparently you are one of them. I have mentioned this before, but I imagine you as a sort of modern day incarnation of Howard Campbell, dress in his ridiculous powder blue stars & stripes Nazi outfit. As American as apple strudel! It’s ridiculous that you claim to be an American when racial hatred is the very opposite of what it means to be American.
“None of that has anything to do with being against anti-Whitism.”
Oh, you’re really convincing me now. They’re not putdowns, they’re just helpful observations. You’re not a bigot, you’re just “against anti-Whitism”.
“Why do you even want to live around us?”
If by “us” you mean people idiotic enough to think their “loyalty” schtick and rebranding games are fooling (or helping) anyone, yes, that can indeed be awfully taxing, and downright depressing at times, but I’ve since developed a thick skin. This, too, shall pass.
I’m not sure if it was Generic American (“Jenner”) or one his many compatriots but I was also told that the current publisher of NYT Arthur Sulzberger was definitely a Jew despite his grandfather marrying a non-Jew and his father having become Episcopalian and also marrying a non-Jew.
One quarter Jew despite being raised Christian is still enough, according to the men of Unz.
“As long as non-Jews abide by the “Noahide Laws” (which are a sort of basic threshold of civilized behavior)”
Again, three Jews => five opinions. Here’s a smattering w.r.t the question of “Do Christians count as Noahides?”:
There are of course others in the thread who disagree, but it’s fair to say they’re a minority. Granted, reddit tends to attract gatekeepers and holier-than-thou types of all faiths (especially the atheist faith, oddly enough) and they’re not demographically representative, but they can’t be ignored or brushed aside either, and my takeaway is that the consensus is less clear than you think. Some rabbis have also claimed that Amalekites no longer exist in any shape or form, but as we’ve heard from Netanyahu, that’s also not as settled as they would like to think.
Whenever a fine point of Jewish law arises (may I use peanut oil on Passover?), the usual advice is “consult your rabbi”. It’s not “consult reddit”.
Only in your imagination.
The irony you are vainly trying to sidestep is that you agree with Goebbels (which is why I posted that ‘quote’): You will not admit that Jews appointed Claudine Gay to her important positions. You have volunteered on many occasions to claim various Jews of ill repute are not really Jews or not responsible for their actions, if those actions are considered to be negative.
Stating obvious facts (me) to the recalcitrant (you) is hatred? Not hardly. I’m merely trying to give you the gift called Knowledge Is Good, and failing your conversion to honesty, use you as an example of one who prefers lies to knowledge. So far, you’ve been quite the energetic voice of the latter type. I thank you for your service. 🙂
C’mon. The “Jews moved in” argument is rarely made. The “Jews financed Antifa and other tradition destroying movements” is frequently made. At least do your non-AIPAC-ass-kissing readers the courtesy of making that distinction.
“the usual advice is ‘consult your rabbi’…”
Either the r/Judaism community have conspicuously failed consult their rabbis — in which case, what hope is there for the wider Jewish community? — or else, their rabbis themselves exhibit a wider variety of opinions on the matter than you’ve allowed for. It wouldn’t surprise me if the peanut oil answers were likewise lacking in a clear consensus, though the broad implications of that are far less concerning.
Here again, Jews are hardly unique in having a broad range of opinions on touchy and inflammatory topics. On the question of whether non-Christians can be saved, there would likewise be a variety of answers from Christians, I expect, and even the matter of who can even be regarded as a Christian would be addressed in much the same way as these posters considered the matter of who is a Noachide. But several branches of Christianity (Catholics come to mind) have people at the top who have the last word, authority-wise so it’s easier to get an “official” answer. It seems to me it’s less clear as to who gets the last say in Judaism. For example,
However,
Make of that what you will. Would he rescue a drowning Christian, even though he explicitly says one should not save a drowning idol worshipper? Again, my takeaway is at best ambiguous, but leaning towards “maybe don’t bother”. And if you can’t get a clear answer out of Maimonedes himself, how would the community of rabbis be able to settle the matter with any more clarity?
Hitler may have been validly baptised. Not sure anyone has ever determined the last time he attended Mass. There is no question he was excommunicate.
Haven’t a clue what Pritziker and the two others do. In any case, I don’t have any time for the Joobabble on these threads. My concern was your assertion about Hitler. No clue what the habits of the Hitler family ca. 1900 were.
==
Some people are attracted to theories of everything and apply systems like Marxism or psychoanalysis promiscuously. The garage sale version you see at Unz, and involves Joo wirepullers everywhere. Aside from the usual self-aggrandizing impulses, you’ll likely find a substrate of resentments at their wife’s divorce lawyer, the supervisor who gave them a caustic performance review, and that guy who stole their college girlfriend.
==
You can see it’s supplemented on this thread with animadversions contra ‘New England Yankees’ who haunt their imaginations.
“In the distant past, that may have been true. Only an idiot would believe it now”
So you link to an extremist group who, if you think about it, is your ally against Jews.
“There will be blood”
By who? Certainly not YOU.
3. Haven’t a clue, haven’t a clue, don’t care.
==
2. I support the Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza doing something they’ve never done before: develop some constructive objects and pursue them. No clue what you mean by ‘erasure’.
==
1. ‘Ordinary military operations’ vary in their manifestation according to technology available. This one would be closest to Fallujah.
That’s a fantasy. The Romans weren’t into people moving. The broad mass of Palestinians stayed right where they had been since pre-history — in Palestine.
Of course the record is unclear, but it would appear that a lot converted to Christianity — which, after all, started out as a Jewish sect.
The bulk of the remainder appear to have converted to Islam when the Muslims ‘opened the books,’ so to speak, in the eighth-ninth century.
Speaking broadly, the Jews of the Bible are today’s Palestinians. Those who call themselves Jews today are not, as a rule, Palestinians. That’s just the way it is. Just like in about four months it’ll be a lot warmer than it is now.
You can like that or not. It’s still the situation.
Like Islam, then.
You’re as good as Muslims!
It’s funny how often those who haven’t a better argument resort to that coinage.
Which ‘men of Unz’ assert that? What percentage? Seventy? Ninety?
You must be pretty sure — you sound like it. So give us the names and what they said. Give us half a dozen.
Because life under a large continental regime run by a single legislative body easily captured by special interests is so much better than a loose Union of independent states? One thing about the large importation of post Civil War populations having no skin in the fights of the past is they minimize the significance of those fights and the truthful telling of the fights favoring instead the lazy approach of accepting unquestioningly victor’s history even when the same forces that brought about those earlier “victories” are making their presence felt in the here and now in a very negative way.
Keep your head buried in the sand. It’s safer down there.
Now there is a cogent, convincing argument, addressing Errican’s actual points and effectively rebutting them.
…JackD at his finest, I would say.
The question came up over whether or not Jews controlled the media. I gave several examples, including the NYT. What’s your opinion, is a one quarter Jew raised Christian still a Jew for purposes of controlling the media?
The other examples were unambiguous gentiles (WaPo, WSJ and LA Times).
I don’t remember who replied to me and I’m not going to waste my trying to find it. If you don’t believe me, suit yourself. Why would I make it up?
Really? Why, then, does Shulhan Arukh, aka the Code of Jewish Law, “the most widely consulted of the various legal codes in Judaism” and also “the most widely accepted compilation of halakha or Jewish law ever written” assign gentiles along with “dishonest butchers, gamblers, usurers and thieves who cannot act as witnesses”?
Or perhaps you might explain why the Chief Sephardic Rabbi of Israel once explained that non-Jews exist to serve Jews in the Land of Israel.
Or why the Israeli legislature passed a specific law stating that only Jews have “the right of self-determination” in Israel.
Or maybe you can explain to me why all of us goyish guests were seated at a separate table with separate plates and utensils at a Seder in Israel… while Jews from the same American contingent were seated with Israeli Jews and allowed to eat at the “clean” table.
Lots of Jews of his time considered Trinity idolatry. Maimonides didn’t just condemn Christians as idolators – he advocated slaughtering them as such when and where possible.
Not quite. Islam, whatever its defects, is a universalist religion, with all the egalitarianism that entails. Meanwhile Judaism is a particularist, tribal religion.
Tell me more about the barbecuing babies.
Judaism isn’t a religion so much as it is a group strategy to compete for advantage against non-members of the group.
Coalition of the fringes… Would that refer to a big fraction of unz.com readers, A motley crew of vaccine denialists, election conspiricists, Jew haters, and assorted cranks and losers?
I’ll answer your question. You ‘make it up’ — imagine it to be so, to be fair — because you find it congenial and because it removes the need for considering the substantial points at issue.
If you’re going to insist Jewish influence in the US isn’t wildly disproportionate to their numbers and devastating in its effects, suit yourself. It would be nice if it weren’t the case, I’ll agree with that. Unfortunately, it is the case.
Can you supply a specific reference?
He was confirmed as a teenager, and presumably attended church services to appease his mother. But he had lost his early faith by that point. There is no evidence to suggest he ever attended Mass after his mother’s death.
As I said before, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao had way more differences than similarities as human beings. But one thing they shared in common was the combination of a moderately skeptical father (not atheists-we are talking about three men born as impoverished peasants in rural Austria, Georgia, and Hunan in the 19th Century-and accommodating enough to the piety of their wives, but Alois Hitler was at least anticlerical and the Confucius preferring Mao Yichang only began to fear excessive atheism after a near death experience with a tiger), and a devout mother whose religious faith helped them endure the deaths of multiple children, and hoped their healthy boy would become a priest or monk when he was little.
No clue what you’re chuffering about here.
Right about the time Jag D started stealing Alden’s Men of Unz shtick, I tried replying with my own variant of “… of Unz” which our host and free speech champion SS promptly flushed. I’ll leave it to the reader to guess what that first word was. (Hint: not a slur or curse)
No she wasn’t. She had written two(?) published papers in her academic career, a laughably small output in an arena where “publish or perish” is the rule. She had zero business being where she was. As someone else said about Kamala, she would have made a good middle school assistant principal.
“Maimonides didn’t just condemn Christians as idolators – he advocated slaughtering them…”
Plenty of cancer wards and dialysis centers are named for some Moskowitz or Feinberg or Shapiro benefactor.
Inasmuch as the triple parentheses crowd around here conspicuously forgets about things like that, it’s saddening to realize — as is evident from that reddit thread — that some of these benefactors’ own coreligionists question their loyalty and regard their deeds with disappointment.
That sounds like exactly the kind of predicament many whites have found themselves in. So much for the Jews-aren’t-white crowd.
Does it rhyme with “chews”?
That’s true. But there sometimes is also a self-aggrandizing reason for such things. The most flagrant I personally saw was at Johns Hopkins. One of the original buildings had been named Rowland Hall, after Professor Rowland, an experimental physicist known for fabricating the highest quality diffraction gratings, used in the early 20th century for spectroscopy. A bigwig finance guy and alum, Zanvyl Krieger, had Rowland Hall renamed after him. They even got rid of Rowland’s name, which had been carved into the original building. As a sop, they changed the name of the Physics Department to reflect Rowland’s name. But I never understood why they simply didn’t name a new building after Krieger instead of de-personing an existing building.
WASPS didn’t yet hate themselves. In 1960 I’d take the WASPS over the Jews sight unseen, but now all of our elites seem equally bad. Jews are just more likely to be elites.
To those who rationalize the brutal Israeli operation ongoing in the Gaza strip, a report by Yuval Abraham (the kill ratios are scores of civilians for every putative low-level Hamas operative, and they are deliberately targeted while at home, with cheaper “dumb” munitions):
‘Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/israel-and-anti-gentile-traditions/
Hitler was not a Catholic. Unlike Jewishness, which is a particularist amalgamation of matrilineal heritage, ethnicity, and religion, Catholicism is a universal religion, full stop. Hitler might have grown up with a Catholic mother, but he was not a Catholic and led an occultist political party that was deeply anti-Catholic.
And the comparison to the Jews and Harvard is highly deceptive (as is usual with you). Jewish elites do dominate Harvard whether as donors or as administrators. Meanwhile, Catholic regions were stridently anti-Nazi in Germany: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2014/02/catholics-were-much-less-likely-to-vote-for-the-nazis.html

You know all this, because I brought this up to your attention before, yet you keep repeating this blood-libel for obviously malign reasons.
Whoah, my brother, don’t get all riled up there. You certainly read a whole lot into my off-handed and short comment. Four paragraphs worth at least. Truly I was delighted at your interest. Hence the LOL. I’ve only been commenting here since 2016 so probably am not in the elite of commenters such as yourself but I get by. Honestly I’m only here to get in the odd LOL or AGREE every now and then. Take care, ydydy. See ya in the funny papers.
It cracks me up that larping tough guys like you still make comments like that. My girlfriend could probably slap you silly!
And I’m not one of the anti-Semites on this board. I’m with Sgt. Hartman on this: you’re all equally worthless!
“But there sometimes is also a self-aggrandizing reason for such things.”
All philanthropy and building dedication is like that, to some extent. And there are plenty of specifically Jewish causes that Krieger could have chosen to support — allowing Jewish kids make Aliyah trips, summer programs for Jewish kids (or “camps”, if that’s still an acceptable term), more Holocaust memorials, etc. The recipients would have piled the gratitude on thick, I have no doubt.
To the extent he endows something as arcane and off the beaten path as a physics department, that’s a lot more universalist and a lot less self-aggrandizing than some big skyscraper in a megalopolis with “TRUMP” plastered all over it in big gold letters, and the triple parentheses crowd has no problem with any of that.
My reply to this comment seems to have vanished into the digital ether.
“My girlfriend could probably slap you silly!”
Look who’s larping now.
“And I’m not one of the anti-Semites on this board.”
Are you so sure that anti-semitism is real?
“I’m with Sgt. Hartman on this: you’re all equally worthless”
Even pro-whites, huh.
There was literally an “American Nazi Party”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nazi_Party


You think calling these guys Nazis, because they were born in the U.S., is being “a lazy minded dimwit”?
Even Jared Taylor was unhappy when Richard Spencer started Sieg Hailing after Trump won.
Although there have been exceptions in time and place, converting to Judaism has generally been made difficult. Conversion to Islam has generally been far easier. Although it is considered heterodox by Sunnis, the Bektashi order played a major role in winning converts from Christianity in the Balkans under Ottoman rule – perhaps it was even designed for that.
Nothing. There is nothing in that Takimag article that I would expect Jack D or Sailer to disagree with today. Your perceptual apparatus is broken. That was the point of the comment Sailer appended to the article above.
No one other than you thinks this.
I note that Sailer was right to predict that the un-capitalized locution “jew” would be used by the likes of you.
Of course some Jews have power, and Jews in general punch above their weight. I respond immediately above to a link to a Takimag article from several years ago where Sailer says this without equivocation. It’s the idea that he has changed his position on this or needs on every possible occasion (even where it is irrelevant) to restate it that is diagnostic of the lunacy you suffer from and of which your response here is a result that he so accurately predicted.
I’m puzzling over the ” the 6 grilling rave attendees” bit. Huh?
This question would make more sense if the group inquired about were the subjects of mutilation for the purposes of “changing their sex”[sic]. But “the medical programs used to victimize so many at Dachau” don’t, so far as I know, fit that description. If I’m wrong please enlighten me.
Your saying it does not make it so. Pritzger is a Jew (Hyatt heiress) but just because she does something doesn’t mean that “the jews” have done it. If you donate a few hundred $million to Harvard you, too, could help pick which black female gets Gay’s former job. Would that mean “the catholics” (or whatever) did it?
I’m here merely repeating a point Jack D (and, e.g., Hypnotioad) already made but you sub-normals seem to have great difficulty picking up on it.
Wikipedia: First Battle of Fallujah US, etc 27 killed, Al Q. etc. 184–228 killed…
572–616 civilians killed. Second Battle of Fallujah US, etc. 107 killed, Al Q. etc. 1,200–2,000 killed…
581–800 civilians killed. I’m not sure how many civilians were still present for the 2nd round (compare with Gaza, where virtually no one has left), but that’s when (according to you) “[not] targeting the entire population”.
If the IDF actually were targeting the entire population they’re doing a remarkably poor job of killing it, IMHO.
And the “success” of the “raid” depens on what must be a very odd metric. Terrorist dead were the largest number of dead on 10/7 et seq. When did that change?
Who are you to tell Sailer that he must join a team? Still less tell him what it is.
Of course, if you view him as being on a different team and harangue those you view as being on your team to, say, block him from public life, or expel him from the country, or kill him, then you could maybe force him onto the team of those who want to do you in first.
But he’s not a Jew and you and yours don’t anyway amount to more than brown stains so he could continue to ignore you… but in this post he’s chosen not to.
Does the utter implausibility of the things you say make a difference?
Not to you, obviously.
No, no one has conceded your “each week” claim either. Israel has done nothing like 10/7 at any time, not even once.
Oh, come on. Be more certain. None of your other beliefs require actual knowledge to produce certainty in you.
It’s April. Why are you quoting some unsourced blurb from before January 12? Do you have even one example of “The Israeli military… killing some of its own civilians and soldiers to prevent Hamas from taking them as captives back to Gaza” as opposed to captives getting killed by Israeli fire directed art terrorists, which is not the same thing? Link?
Ukraine is not right now a combination of the purely Ukrainian and Russian, and extracting the Russian would not leave something purely Ukrainian.
No…I’m really asking a question. Is it Jews, or is it more just New England gentiles doing it to themselves?
Both strike me as perfectly plausible.
This seems relevant.
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/israeli-hq-ordered-troops-shoot-israeli-captives-7-october
From Ron Unz.
https://www.unz.com/runz/the-jewish-roots-of-the-gaza-rampage/
That’s our Jack.
George is quite right that ““The Secret Six, who financed John Brown’s raid [seems] a bit like today’s Jihadi organizations only with Muslims replaced by Unitarians”, and your evidence for denying this is trash. Did you even read the Wikipedia article you link to? The claim you quote from the lede, “The men involved helped Brown as individuals and did not work together or correspond with each other”, is, as res points out, directly contradicted by the article’s text.
You don’t have to pay Taki to read David Coles. I happen to be playing back some of his articles right now using an anonymous window (I’m not sure why I switched to that this time) and there’s a popup that makes you wait a few seconds for his articles to come up if you’re not a subscriber, but that seems to be it. I no longer have to edit out in-line ads to put the text into a text-to-speech ap, so that’s an improvement.
I have no idea what “he feverishly defended the idea of Mexican white nationalists” might refer to, though I eventually get around to listening to most of his stuff. Frankly, you don’t seem particularly reliable and a disjunction between what he writes and how you describe it is unsurprising. But (a) “Mexican white nationalists” is not obviously a more foolish idea than “US white nationalists” and (b) neither sounds much like anything Coles would advocate. His schtick is defending conservative politics from anything that would scare off the normies at the voting box, and advocating “white nationalism” of any sort just doesn’t sound like him.
You’re an imbecile. GW, in the passage you quoted, SAID his list was from “before those from the pale of settlement were here and influencing American political and social thought”, so how could it contain individuals “from the 21st Century, or even the second half of the 20th”? And, no, their ethnic group could not and has not “gone extinct thanks to Judaic attacks on White identity and Judaic maniacal pushing of mass immigration”. Sheesh.
Of course VDARE not only “would” accept Sailer, it routinely and currently republishes him. I’m not seeing anything in its “face value” that makes that surprising.
If you wanted to know you wouldn’t be pretending that your search engine is broken.
Contra vous, Jack D has not denied that specific Jews participated in the selection of Claudine Gay. He’s denied that (quoting Sailer) “the jews” did it. He’s made this distinction repeatedly and consistently and your refusal to acknowledge this demonstrates that your prattle about his failure to “convert to honesty” is just that.
Chiding others for failing to make distinctions while conflating “Jews financed Antifa and other tradition destroying movements” with ““the jews financed Antifa and other tradition destroying movements” was an fine display of Nazi-like chutzpah.
Really? When did that happen?
No, they’re Israelis. Approximately 80% of Israeli Jews were born in Israel.
Speaking broadly, the Palestinian Arabs are essentially genetically identical to Mizrahi Israelis.
Ashkenazi Jews constitute only 44% of Israel’s population and their paternal lineages are also Levantine.
So, mostly you are spouting ignorant shit.
“Errican”‘s actual point in quoting Goebbels and attributing the quote to Gray is non-obvious, so a demand that it be cogently refuted is absurd.
As is his assertion that Jack D agreed with Goebbels when he did nothing of the sort.
I wouldn’t say your comment is a particularly fine example of shit-for-brains in action, but it IS a good example of it.
Twelve consecutive comments by Gandydancer up to the comment I am replying to. Impressive.
And seven more before this one? Can’t be sure yet given moderation.
“George is quite right that ““The Secret Six, who financed John Brown’s raid [seems] a bit like today’s Jihadi organizations only with Muslims replaced by Unitarians””
He and you made a claim. Back it up.
Worth noting Gandydancer’s silence when he is actually supplied with the link(s) he requested. Funny how that works. Infinite time and energy to engage with this thread otherwise though. Looking forward to another stream of non-responsive comments following this. Or maybe running away is more appropriate? Hard to say.
If you believe Unz’s unhinged theory about Oct 7 (yes I read it) you’re as crazy as him.
No comments on the other link?
Regarding my link to Ron’s piece. Remember that this was Gandydancer’s statement I was countering.
Rebutting that is a long way from agreeing with everything Ron says about October 7th. Do you disagree that the evidence presented in my two links is responsive to and at least calls into serious question Gandydancer’s point? Worth considering a subsidiary point. There is a difference between “Israeli fire directed art terrorists” and “Israeli fire directed at terrorists with reckless disregard for the lives of any hostages present.” The latter seems a better description of what happened.
You are familiar with the ad hominem fallacy, right? And by familiar I don’t mean using it as you did. I mean understanding why it is a fallacy. And not appreciated by people who value thoughtful conversation.
P.S. In my comment 548 I neglected the possibility of someone else intervening. Well played. Will still be interesting to see how Gandydancer does or does not respond. So far after a stream of twelve comments one day and nine the next (I assume people here recognize the multiples of three as due to the three comments per thread in one hour limit) we have almost two days of silence. Looks like running away is winning.
I didn’t read in detail everything Gandydancer wrote. I just noted the one reference by you to Ron Unz. I believe he is very wrong and would not trust a word he writes much less cite him. He is not a credible source IMO.
I didn’t check Electronic Intifada. I don’t trust them either.
There’s no point arguing back and forth at this point. Each side can produce links that tell different stories. There is what I believe to be a tremendous amount of incorrect information out there on Oct 7.
It depends on the source and I don’t trust those two sources. But suit yourself. At least I know where you stand now.
Keep in mind that as much as many people (including you?) would like to pretend otherwise this is not an issue with views split into a dichotomy. I doubt you know as much about my views on this as you claim (or think you do).
As I asked once before, do you think the statement from Gandydancer which I quoted holds? If you are going to engage with a comment of mine I think it quite fair to expect you to read at least the comment to which it was a reply. And for your convenience I included a quote of the relevant portion in the comment you were replying to.
That at least we can agree about. Can we also agree neither Israel nor the Palestinians (and their respective advocates and detractors) have a monopoly on misinformation? The point where I suspect we disagree is which views are being amplified by the mass media in the US.
P.S. Who do you trust on this issue? I suspect that would make quite clear where YOU stand–because I am guessing those sources don’t make a pretense of neutrality. And about there being no point in arguing further. I agree, feel free to give me the last word and this will end. I will note I do see some value in having you articulate your position and sources.
If that (“Do you see that as a good thing, or a bad thing? Is it what happened?”) was a real question then you must be pretty oblivious to cues since it was perfectly obvious, even before Sailer’s follow-up comment (“So that explains why Amherst was so conservative up through 1979.”) that he thought that the idea (which you “find… perfectly plausible”) that ” Amherst was always a conservative, traditionalist, heterosexual, level-headed, God-fearing haven from big city ideas until The jews moved in and ruined it” was lunacy. Hence my response, “Why would you expect Sailor to pronounce on whether something that never happened is a good thing or a bad thing?”
As if. My time and energy to engage with this thread is actually such that I just reached the comment to which you posted your response yesterday, so apparently YOU are the one with comparatively infinite time and energy to devote here. LOL!
Unz is quoted making one of his lunatic claims (“I think that perhaps as few as 100-200 unarmed Israeli civilians may have been killed by the Hamas fighters, in many cases inadvertently, while all the rest died at the hands of Israel’s own trigger-happy military.” Inadvertently, my ass. 100-200, my ass.) and I will now look at the link and respond to it. I very much doubt that it will ACTUALLY be what I requested.
Indeed it is. It proves MY point. It references the article which the pre-publication blurb claimed showed
What the publish article ACTUALLY says, according to the link you supply now is
So the answer to my challenge,
is NO, YOU (Jim Dandy) and YOU (res) DON’T.
As to quoting Unz’ beliefs about the body count, one can only laugh. The off-the-charts nuttiness of his beliefs is legendary.
You did that for us by pointing to the Wikipedia article, which reveals that the Secret Six were just fine with initiating a race war, they just thought Harper’s Ferry was too far east and too close to the forces that could suppress such an eagerly anticipated (by them) outbreak. Noting that Abolitionist terrorism and Jihadi terrorism are both terrorism, and that the groups trying to initiate the one are “a bit like” the group that tried to initiate the other should be obvious.
What you haven’t responded to, and are attempting a deflection from, is your quote of and endorsement of the lies in Wikipedia’s lede about the Six not having engaged in a conspiracy, which even a cursory reading of the article reveals to be an utter lie. Both of us have pointed this out to you and, tellingly, you have attempted no defense for repeating and endorsing the lie.
Ctrl-F in this thread for:
Gandydancer says: 36 hits
res says: 14 hits
Nuff said on that I would say. LOL! indeed.
You seem to have missed a clarification I offered in another comment.
When you blow up vehicles containing both kidnappers and captives I think it is clear the priority is not preserving the lives of the hostages. Though that does fit nicely with the idea of a “Hannibal directive.”
I consider your admission of many vehicles containing Israeli captives being blown up intentionally sufficient contradiction of your original point.
You:
The point is not to tout his exact numbers. It is to make clear a significant number of the Israeli casualties were likely due to “friendly” fire.
Laughter and ad hominems do not make an argument. No matter how much you wish it were so.
P.S. Good to see you did not run away. Defending the indefensible is hard. I feel for you.
FYI: I of course can’t make 12 consecutive comments because the site puts you on a time-out after far less than that. I read down the threads and find all sorts of stupid shit from the brown stains to refute or deride, and then I do other things when I am put on hiatus by the software, keeping the window open or, sometimes, reopening it in response to a reply notification in my email. Which is why I’m 2.4 days behind right now, with a corresponding gross amount of unread stupid shit in this thread, including replies to me. Why my comments sometime appear in a block is probably due to the fact that I may be reading the thread overnight while most others are asleep and, also, after the commenting has died down. Thus hiatus may expire with no one else having commented.
To reiterate, ““Israeli fire directed at terrorists with reckless disregard for the lives of any hostages present” is NOT what Jim Dandy quoted the paper’s pre-publication blurb (if that’s what it was) as claiming the article would show. It claimed “The Israeli military [killed] some of its own civilians and soldiers to prevent Hamas from taking them as captives back to Gaza.” I made the point that these are two different things right off the bat but you ignored that despite here quoting me making the distinction. Now, how about NOW admitting that the words Jim Dandy quoted were a lie? Sheesh.
Looky here Dandyprancer, the phrase “the Jews” was used sarcastically by Sailer referencing Amherst (the town), and by Jack D referencing Harvard University.
In Jack’s case, it was a straw man because no one except Jack D used the collective unqualified phrase “the Jews” to describe the specific Jews—whom I individually named—who promoted Gay through the ranks. Poor Jack is forever doomed to validate, by proxy, Goebbel’s quote.
You’re not in position to erase the fact that what Jim Dandy quoted was a lie by suggesting a different complaint about IDF actions. Especially if you attempt this obfuscation of my point (WHICH WAS THAT IT WAS A LIE) without admitting first that it was a lie. Indeed you offered a link that supposedly disproved my ACTUAL POINT that actually proved it. You haven’t admitted THAT either.
As to whether the IDF shooting up vehicles stolen from ravers and others as they attempted to flee back to Gaza was “reckless disregard” for the lives of the “human shields” that might be on board, that’s a different discussion entirely, though I disagree with you about that too. Refusal to allow hostage-taking to work seems sensible to me. The guy who planned 10/7 was released (along with many, many other terrorists) from Israeli prison in an earlier idiotic exchange of a lot for very little, and that just got more people killed in the end. As would probably have letting the terrorists get back to Gaza unmolested, where they would be harder and more expensive in Israeli life to kill. The Hannibal Doctrine isn’t reckless disregard, it’s well-considered proper regard for a longer view. It’s not just the hostages’ lives at stake.
Nonsense. You clearly endorsed his ridiculous junk numbers by quoting them absent others, and now you’ve done it again by claiming that his shit “makes clear” anything other than that he is a nutter. It does not. Unz’s crazy opinions have no probative value whatsoever for anyone with a lick of sense and any experience with him.
So stop obfuscating and tell us what you mean by “significant”. Because I, too, don’t think the number killed inadvertently by friendly fire was “insignificant”, so so far you’ve communicated nothing solid but only a vaporous anti-IDF slur. If you have an evaluable claim to make state it clearly and I’ll evaluate your evidence for it, if any. And don’t Mott-and-Bailey me again by making a different claim entirely.
And, no, what I’m doing is not hard. Pointing out your cheap tricks and obfuscations is EASY.
Bullshit. Jack’s refuted this and I’ve refuted this but you and your brown-stain brigade’s Goebbels-like activity includes just repeating your lies endlessly.
Here is your version of the Goebbels quote:
Of course Jack has never denied being a Jew or expressed any injury at being identified as one. So, so much for that. Nor has he denied that Prizger played a significant role in choosing which affirmative action candidate was going to get the job Gay was bounced from or that Pritzger is a Jew. So you lied about that too. What he’s denied AND WHAT YOU’VE CLAIMED (“…of course it would implicate all [Jews] as a group…”) despite your attempt to obfuscate that you’ve done it is that he and Pritzger can be meaningfully lumped together in locutions like “The jews did this”.
It’s exactly YOUR kind of behavior that Sailer was predicting and being sarcastic about, so what we are supposed to conclude from the fact that Sailer was being sarcastic is non-obvious.
Uh oh. Dandyprancer doesn’t know what “by proxy” means.
LOL, no, Sailer was making a point about the peculiarities of the town of Amherst. Jack went a bit too far by claiming Jews (or as he facetiously put it, no one else, “the Jews”) were not guilty for Gay’s rise at Harvard. If you’re defending Jack trying to steer blame away from those Jews, Goebbels has got your number as well.
Cue: “Same Old Scene” by Proxy Music
I guess you have realized you actually don’t have an effective response to my point so all you can do is point at a different point by JimDandy and make lots of noise in my general direction.
P.S. We are up to 43 “GandyDancer says” in this thread. Thank you for continuing to decisively refute your attempt at saying I am spending more time on this than you are. Your comment 559 was a great description of the effort you have to put in to make so many consecutive comments given the commenting limits. That was the point of my original “consecutive comments” statement. BTW, the limit is 3 in an hour.
That was the second of two links. Comments are better if you don’t start them off by lying.
Whether or not you like Ron’s opinions it is hard to claim he fails to provide references. Which is much of my reason for linking his articles.
If you care so much about exact numbers how about you give your estimate first?
The word is “Motte.” And that is funny coming from you after you all your comments to me directed at a different point from JimDandy.
Then why are you failing so spectacularly? Perhaps because the things you claim to be pointing out aren’t really there? Projection is such a useful concept.
To reiterate, here is your statement which I challenged.
Since we are talking about Motte and Bailey it is worth noting that your transition from “Do you have even one example” to an argument over what constitutes “significant” is a great example.
The dishonesty of that would be amusing, if the crimes you seek to deny weren’t so horrific.
The primary distinction between you and a Holocaust Denier is that the crimes the Holocaust Denier would insist didn’t happen at least are in the past; you would deny and effectively permit evil that is ongoing.
Morally, you’re a monster.
“What you haven’t responded to, and are attempting a deflection from, is your quote of and endorsement of the lies in Wikipedia’s lede about the Six not having engaged in a conspiracy”
No.
My bone of contention regards the claim that the six men are like today’s Jihadi organizations. Please explain how and why from your perspective, noting specific similarities. Thank you.
The overall quality is low. I’m spending less time here lately. There’s better forums elsewhere. I haven’t quit completely but I’m close.
Steve himself is fine but the site hosts many others with very unconventional views, verging on crazy IMO. Their commenters then drift over to Steve’s.
I know precisely what “by proxy” means. but what I have no clue about is what relevance “by proxy” has to the question of whether “the jews” put Gay into the Presidency of Harvard. Did Jack do this by proxy, using Pritzger as his cat’s-paw?
No, Sailer’s comment about what the likes of you were likely to say about Amherst was NOT “a point about the peculiarities of the town of Amherst.” It was a comment about YOU.
You are attempting to obfuscate the actual sequence of events in this exchange.
MY point, which preceded your comment on my response to Jim Dandy, was that THE CLAIM THAT THE ISRAELI TIMES ARTICLE WOULD SHOW THAT THE ISRAELIS KILLED TERRORIST CAPTIVES IN ORDER TO PREVENT HAMAS FROM TAKING THEM TO GAZA was a lie. YOU then linked to a description of that article which indeed showed that what had happened was that the IDF had fired on terrorists rather than targeting captives. Jim Dandy’s “point” is not a “different” one, but was the whole subject of the comment to which you “responded”. I pointed that out to you, but a more recent comment by you (“I consider your admission of many vehicles containing Israeli captives being blown up intentionally sufficient contradiction of your original point.”) shows how determined you are to pretend that this conversation has nat been about the fact that the claim about the IDF was a lie. Which you STILL haven’t admitted despite inadvertently providing proof of it.
And of course I DID respond to your attempt at distraction by saying that the Hannibal Directive (which the article says was never mentioned by the IDF in its instructions to its pilots, but which I agree was implemented in spirit by destroying the fleeing terrorist vehicles) is entirely sensible. I don’t know what “point” you are referring to that I have supposedly left unaddressed. You may not like my response, but it was made and you have left it unrebutted. So I take it that it is YOU who have no “effective response”.
I haven’t transitioned from “Do you have even one example” to anything. You tried to provide an example but examination of it revealed that it wasn’t one, but instead PROVED MY POINT. The answer is that you don’t have any examples and, that established, there is nothing further to say.
I then responded to your attempt to change the subject by claiming that Unz’s claims about the number of Israelis killed on 10/7 “made clear” that the IDF had killed a “significant” number of them by asking what you meant by “significant”. This isn’t an attempt by ME to change the subject. YOU did that.
You extracted “absent others” from my comment, but a more complete quote is,
Saying that Unz in his article links to sources supposedly supporting his conclusions (I’ll take your word for that) in his article is no answer to my observation that you endorsed HIS numbers HERE by quoting Unz without reservation AND ABSENT OTHERS, explicitly claiming them to be credible. ( “[What Unz says] make[s it] clear a significant number of the Israeli casualties were likely due to “friendly” fire.”) You think people are too stupid to notice this attempt at conflating two different assertions, but thinking that I won’t notice and won’t point this out is what is so utterly brown-stain level stupid.
In the Wikipedia article on the Toledot Yeshu, a sort of parody of the life of Christ, it is noted in one manuscript of it by someone, possibly the scribe who copied the manuscript that it is the kind of thing best kept in “the language of prudence”, ie. Hebrew. A certain delicacy about translating certain things is certainly apparent.
What you are is an idiot if you think I give a damn about your name-calling.
I repeat, Israel has done nothing like 10/7 at any time, not even once. What Israel is doing isn’t evil, it is an appropriate response to evil.
You:” The men involved helped Brown as individuals and did not work together or correspond with each other.”
me: “What you haven’t responded to, and are attempting a deflection from, is your quote of and endorsement of the lies in Wikipedia’s lede about the Six not having engaged in a conspiracy”
you: “No”
Sir, you lie.
It’s actually something like a cross between Babi Yar and the suppression of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.
My “no” was dismissing your effort to focus on something that I was not focusing on. Your problem is with Wikipedia, not me.
Again, my bone of contention regards the claim that the six men are like today’s Jihadi organizations. Please explain how and why from your perspective, noting specific similarities. Thank you.
This is great. Is there some way you can both lose the argument?
No, Jack is trying to say that no Jews were responsible. In other words, he is attempted (and failed) to exonerate the Jews responsible (not himself specifically, hence by proxy) for promoting Gay because he knows their skullduggery makes Jews in general look bad and he doesn’t like it when people notice Jews doing bad things.
Wrong, goof, here’s Sailer’s sentence to which I referred:
I commented specifically about Jews and Harvard (in reply to Jack who brought it up, not me). Check the thread again; you seem confused about who wrote what.
You’re not confused you’re lying.
You: “…Jack is trying to say that no Jews were responsible.”
Jack D:
(a) “The Men of Unz have this kind of unique sort of vision that when there is a Jew in the room (and things that are bad in their opinion are happening) then everyone (even the President of the United States) fades into the background and you can only see Joos pulling the levers.”
(b)“The Jews” weren’t responsible for her elevation[, but] they were responsible for getting rid of her. [I assume that some who had input into getting rid of Gay were non-Jewish, and acknowledge that Jack is incoherent in the flatness of the latter claim.]
(c)”[The Nazi Party was] not an exclusively Austrian Catholic endeavor any more than Harvard is an exclusively Jewish enterprise because of Penny Pritzker.”
You: “Are you claiming Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber are not Jews?”
Jack D: “Are you claiming Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber exercise sole control over Harvard and that there are no non-Jews involved in running it? / Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber are Jewish AFAIK but you seize upon that to draw conclusions that are not supported by logic.”
So, he has repeatedly NOT said that no Jews were responsible in the hiring of Gay. What he’s said is that “the Jews” are not responsible for it. Your failure to acknowledge that he has made this distinction is dishonest.
As to the Sailer quote, I repeat that it is clearly ABOUT the likes of you and not about Amherst. That you can quote it and not understand this simply indicates brain damage. Were you dropped on your head at some point?
No, there is no way I can lose the argument with Corvinus any more than there is any way I can lose the argument with you. In both cases my opponent is both egregiously wrong and an idiot.
I’m focusing on the fact that you quoted what Wikipedia said to disprove George’s observation, and that what you quoted was a lie that you have even yet not acknowledged was a lie, though you have had considerable time now to do so. Until you come clean about that I will continue to focus on it whether or not it is what YOU choose to focus on.
Right or left, you nutters are so like each other. Wright still hasn’t admitted that Jim Dandy’s claim that the IDF killed hostages to keep them from being taken to Gaza was a lie, just like you refuse to admit that your quote from Wikipedia was a lie. Peas in a pod.
And I’ve ALREADY said that secret cells focused on financing religiously motivated terrorism are, as a prima facie matter, OBVIOUSLY “a bit like” each other. If you think they are not you’ll have to try again as your quote of Wikipedia lying was so clearly a fail.
The Muzzies bin Laden touched up to finance Al Q didn’t necessarily gather in a room to talk to each other, but they were all members of a terrorist cell just the same.
Uh oh, you left this out from Jack D to Jim Dandy:
Of course, the answer is yes: Claudine Gay is an example of Jewish domination of academia. No one would here would know the name Claudine Gay if she wasn’t elevated (as it happens, by Jews) to the presidency of Harvard.
You and Jack have tried (and failed, quite entertainingly) to deny that “example of Jewish domination of academia”, in the process ironically validating (by proxy) Goebbel’s quote as cribbed by Claudine Gay.
No, it’s about Amherst. Read it again, it couldn’t be clearer. I know you wish it wasn’t so, but Sailer’s a straight shooter and doesn’t speak in esoteric code. It’s scuzzy of you to attempt to twist the meaning of what he wrote.
Sailer’s comment hit quite a nerve and and is repeated dozens of time in this comment thread, so I have read it any number of times. None of the brown stains except you have been in any doubt that it was directed at them. E.g., in comment #2 Mike Tre says “You’re starting to sound like Jack D.” So, according to brain-damaged you Jack D has a recognizable stance on Amherst? LOL!
Claudine Gay wasn’t “elevated (as it happens, by Jews) to the presidency of Harvard.” She was elevated by a board which INCLUDED certain Jews to the Presidency of Harvard, and quite clearly not on the basis that she could be relied upon to take pro-Jewish positions, because her obtuseness regarding the concerns of Jews on campus is what got her fired, again both by Jews and non-Jews. This has been explained to you any number of times but you keep insisting that only Jews chose her, and in misrepresenting… no, lying… that Jack’s position is that no Jews were involved in doing this. Because you think that no one will notice that you are lying? Truly, nothing other than having been repeatedly dropped on your head can explain your faith that anyone other than similarly brain-damaged brown stain individuals will overlook this when it has been spelled out so clearly so many times already.
Here’s the 13 members of the Harvard Corporation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_and_Fellows_of_Harvard_College
It looks like at present that only 2 of the 13 are Jewish, but they have the top 2 jobs: Allan Garber is the acting president and Penny Pritzker is head of his bosses. On the other hand, 3 of the 13 are black, 1 is Mexican, and 6 are women. Back when Claudine Gay was President, only 1 of 13 were Jewish.
On the other hand, a large fraction of big donors to Harvard, like Bill Ackman, are Jewish, but they aren’t well represented due to DEI demands.
What it looks like is there is a war going on between Jewish non-DEIs vs. DEIs, but nobody can quite articulate it.
How about the Jews who provably kept tabs on what bin Laden was up to and at least looked on benevolently?
Would they be members of the terrorist cell as well?
Still proving-by-proxy the Goebbels quote, I see—my comments hit quite a noiv.
Here’s what you’re trying to ignore, from upthread:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/amherst-ma/#comment-6506747 (#451)
Keep wailing, I love it. 🙂
Before being chosen as President, she was chosen by key Chosen as Dean of FAS, which is a major position. She wasn’t merely plucked out of nowhere on a whim. Then-President Bacow and then-Provost Garber appointed her Dean of FAS, with approval of the Corporation, on which mega-donor Pritzker served. As I wrote above (with link to The Harvard Gazette):
https://www.unz.com/isteve/amherst-ma/#comment-6506747 (#451)
You write:
Thank you, Steve. That indicates an affirmative answer from you to Jack’s (faux-naïf) subthread-starting question: “Would you say that Claudine Gay was an example of Jewish domination of academia?”
You continue:
Upthread, I articulated it in one sentence:
More specifically:
In the Harvard example, there are powerful anti-White Jews like Pritzker who are laser-focused on promoting and protecting anti-White Blacks (golems) in important positions (e.g., her early backing of the Half-Blood Prince). Some of those Jews who do so are delusional or unafraid about possible blowback on Jews, because their the main motivation is anti-White spite, and believe(d) the Holocaust card shields them as a non-White protected victim class (“anti-Semitism!”).
Other Jews, like Ackman, are indifferent to well-known institutional anti-White and anti-“oppressor” prerogatives (a major activist donor, he claimed he didn’t know what DEI really meant until after October 7th, LOL) unless it blows back on Jews specifically. Whites, not Jews, were getting the DEI heat as the oppressor category: Jews generally felt protected by the D in the “diversity” umbrella of campus DEI. Until October 8. Ackman:
https://www.thefp.com/p/bill-ackman-how-to-fix-harvard
Neither type of the above “Jewish non-DEIs vs. Jewish DEIs” as you put it, is a friend to Whites, although panicked Jews like Ackman can be a useful weapon (reverse golem? careful..) against the “Jewish DEIs”.
There are some righteous Jews like Amy Wax and Edward Blum who have long fought the good fight, but the former type (Pritzker, Bacow, Garber) are a real problem and are more numerous than the latter in important positions. It turns out that some commenters here don’t like that kind of noticing.
Sorry Steve, that was an accidental misquote by me—you actually wrote:
A bit ambiguous wording—did you mean the “DEIs” in question are Jewish? I count Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber as DEIs.
I wash my hands of your logic.
Maybe you love it, maybe you don’t. I don’t concern myself with the inner life of unembarrassable cretins.
I have course have not ignored Bacow , Garber and Pritzker, and neither did Jack. This claim by you is merely a repeat of your already refuted lie that “Jack is [and I am] trying to say that no Jews were responsible”. Some Jews were partly responsible for Gays elevation, as we’ve both already said.
Since I don’t circulate in brown stain circles I have no real idea what you are talking about. Is this part of the “the jews were behind 9/11” lunacy?
What this has to do with Corvinus’ denial that the Secret Seven were a akin to a jihadist terrorist cell I cannot imagine.
You inability to understand Sailer (as when you insisted his comment about brown-stains was really about Amherst) is indeed quite remarkable. A “DEI” as he’s using it here is a member of a group which gets special positive treatment from the DEI claque and a “non-DEI” is a member only of groups which don’t. As Sailer notes Jews are underrepresented on the Board of Harvard Corporation relative to what one would expect on the basis of their financial contributions to Harvard, etc., and he suggests this is “due to DEI demands”. Are you fantasizing that the underrepresentation of Jews in this fashion is due to demands by Pritzker, Bacow, and Garber? If not then counting them as “DEIs” can’t possibly accord with Sailer’s usage. Are you just too dumb to grasp this? Again?
You inability to write good talk.
Ahem. Let’s review what Steve wrote. After enumerating the demographic makeup of the Corporation, here’s Steve’s assessment:
Unfortunately Steve was inarticulate himself (though humbly so, he apparently includes himself in the last clause). Does “Jewish” modify both “non-DEIs vs. DEIs” (i.e. are both of groups Jews at “war” with each other) or does Jewish only describe the first category (“non-DEIs”)?
I read it as the former, Steve means both parties are Jewish, and here’s why:
I assume, based on what I’ve linked to here of Bacow, Garber, and Pritzker’s effusive praise of Gay as they promoted her to Dean of FAS and then as President of Harvard, that Steve is calling B,G,P “Jewish DEIs”, which would make sense. E.g,. Penny Pritzker as Corporation head is a hard-core “DEI” having personally accelerated and truncated the vetting process while shepherding Gay to be picked as President.
More DEIs: past presidents of Harvard
https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2023/12/harvard-corporation-statement-claudine-gay
Lawrence S. Bacow — Jew
Derek Bok — non-Jew
Drew Gilpin Faust — married to a Jew
Neil L. Rudenstine — Jew
Lawrence H. Summers — Jew
Steve errs in calling the other side “Jewish non-DEIs” because those Jewish big donors were only “non-DEI” after October 7th. Those big donors (Ackman, Blavatnik, Ofer, Wexner, etc.) only stopped supporting DEI Harvard when it suddenly became clear that Jews at Harvard (and other campuses) were not now protected under the DEI aegis.
In short, the “war going on” at Harvard is between Jewish DEIs who want a robust anti-White DEI golem even if there is Jewish and Israeli-interest collateral damage, and Jewish post-10/7s who want the DEI golem explicitly reprogrammed to not target Jews and anything Israel.
As I articulated earlier,
No, you both ignored them until I forced you (not Jack, he’s long since bowed out) to acknowledge them. You’ve yet to acknowledge the key executive positions of the first two, which allowed them to promote and appoint Gay to Dean of FAS and later President of Harvard. They as top executives had final say, and they were quite enthusiastic in their support of her, as I’ve shown. You cravenly have ignored her appointment to Dean of FAS. Bacow, as then-president, had sole discretion and was backed by then-Provost Garber, his executive second in command. Appointing her to to Dean of FAS which was crucial positioning for her to be chosen as President.
In short, your deflections are classic transparent hasbara and you’re schvitzing big time.
Keep it coming Prancer, you’re the perfect stereotypical foil. The funny thing is, you’re so emotionally invested in your fake argument that you’re willing to get whomped by me on the record just so you can compulsively emote on iSteve. Oy.
Denial is not a river in Egypt. If you want to have an honest discussion, let me know.
I don’t need to do that when there are plenty of articles here debunking it.
Maybe he’s dead? I’ve closely known two people with LinkedIn profiles who died and their pages were deleted (or suppressed) in a day. I wondered how they could do that so quickly. By the way they both had names that were not unique so it’s even more surprising.
There are plenty of articles “here” claiming all sorts of stupid things, but how that is supposed to excuse you for pretending that you don’t know what the subject is I cannot fathom. You are an idiot.
You are just being stupid again, which I guess it is difficult to avoid since you are determinedly stupid at all times. Since Sailer didn’t call anyone — not Ackman, Blavatnik, Ofer, Wexner, or anyone else — a “Jewish non-DEI” he certainly didn’t err in doing so.