The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
All We Need Now from Iowa Is a Florida 2000-Like 35 Day Recount
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

And of course there are a couple of other ways of counting the vote in Iowa, with Sanders in the lead on those.

 
Hide 186 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Wow: Bernie Bolshevik has really tightened the race against Bootie Judge, now that those final 38% are finally straggling home. It’s my understanding that turnout was underwhelming, in which case the 3rd-world counting shenanigans have obscured the disappointment quite well.

  2. Anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump’s opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump’s opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @Anon

    If that's your notion of "ideal" I'd hate to see your idea of......

    , @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Anon

    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Bit Head
    @Anon

    Assume there are 10 voting districts with 100 people each. There is a referendum which premise states that five of the voting districts will not pay any tax and the other five will pay all taxes. Four of the five districts which won't pay tax vote 100% for the premise and one district votes 51% against. In each of the other five districts the vote is 80% against the premise.
    The popular vote is 400 + 49 + 100 = 549 or 54.9% of the vote. The referendum passes and one half of the voting districts are screwed.
    If instead each voting district has one electoral vote then the vote would be 6 to 4 against the premise.
    Which is the correct outcome?

    Replies: @Sideshow Bob

    , @Hapalong Cassidy
    @Anon

    Equally interesting would be a 269-269 electoral college tie. In that case, the president would be elected by the incoming House and the VP by the incoming Senate. But don’t break out the champagne yet Dems - the rule is that the House gets one vote per state delegation - so fifty votes in total. Yep, California with its 47 Dem representatives gets the same vote as Wyoming with its one Pub representative. And I believe that at least currently, the Pubs control more states in the House than the Dems do.

    , @Lugash
    @Anon

    I'd like to add that during a debate Trump's opponent ask him to abide by the outcome and not contest the election, and Trump shooting back that his opponent do the same.

    (Trump, PBUH, did miss the chance to do this to Hillary during the debates).

    , @Svevlad
    @Anon

    You want a civil war?

    That's how you get civil war. It would be pretty based if you ask me tho

    , @Daniel Chieh
    @Anon

    Best timeline.

    , @Boethiuss
    @Anon


    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump’s opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump’s opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.
     
    That would definitely have the most comic value, but for us it would be better if the Democrat lost 55-44 or whatever. Because if that happened, in some important ways the Dems would be disempowered as well as objectively defeated.

    Trump is doing a lot better now than he was six months ago, and contrary to my view then he looks more likely to win than lose in November. But even if he does, the fact that he turns off so many people means that we're not going to be as strong as we should be.
  3. Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @bomag

    It's a lucky for the party that their favorite happened to win by a hair in the final tally. But luck favors those who are in charge of the counting.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @The Alarmist
    @bomag


    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    True dat!

    Iowa may just be a dress rehearsal for the General Election in November.
    , @Twodees Partain
    @bomag

    "Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe."

    ...Or, it could break the internet at the very least. Good line, there.

  4. Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary’s email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he’s a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that’s before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    • LOL: jim jones
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @R.G. Camara


    the Gay Version of Obama
     
    Uh, didn’t we already have that? Also starring Michelle-O as Juwanna Mann.

    Replies: @BB753, @Steve in Greensboro

    , @Polynikes
    @R.G. Camara

    His supporters are pretty naive anyways, so I find this whole thing endlessly amusing.

    , @The Wild Geese Howard
    @R.G. Camara


    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.
     
    He's the US version of Emmanuel Maricón...sorry...Macron.
    , @Dennis Dale
    @R.G. Camara

    Bernie's "bros" should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius

    , @Pericles
    @R.G. Camara


    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

     

    Mayor Pete's coming campaign slogan: "Yes Butt"

    Replies: @Desiderius

  5. Maybe a better policy than flipping a coin to break delegate ties would be to choose the candidate with the longer last name. Most presidential elections in recent history have been won by the candidate with the longer surname (popular vote 20 times from 1876 – 1960), although the last election broke that pattern. But then again, usually the taller candidate wins. In this case, Pete has the longer last name … but the same number of letters as Sanders if first names are also included; it all tends to blur together on a ballot anyway. Both leading candidates would be tied assuming both names are counted … and Sanders would get the double tiebreaker because he’s taller. That’s a lot faster than a messy recount. It also has some statistical — albeit fringe — efficacy in picking a winner in the general election. /s

    • Replies: @Aardvark
    @Divine Right

    Maybe they could just bitch-slap each other Stewie vs. Bertram style...

    , @Justvisiting
    @Divine Right


    Maybe a better policy than flipping a coin to break delegate ties would be to choose the candidate with the longer last name.
     
    I think in the future the Democrats will award all ties to the candidate who can document the most perverted sex acts.
  6. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:

    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it’s true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. “Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts”, etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    • Agree: Desiderius
    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    , @Mr McKenna
    @anon



    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.
     
    It's finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I'm sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Boethiuss, @MBlanc46

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @anon


    The situation in Iowa is amusing
     
    No, it isn't. If this can happen in one of the cleanest and most efficient states, then there is no escaping corruption anywhere.

    Replies: @Ozymandias

    , @Justvisiting
    @anon

    In my state in the general election the urban areas have certain precincts hold reporting any results until after the rest of the state has counted.

    These precincts ban any white folks that are not well armed members of organized crime, so there can be no monitoring of the "new" ballots that mysteriously appear after midnight (if needed).

    Think of it as democracy in action.

    , @MBlanc46
    @anon

    It’s a major reason why Trump is likely to “lose” regardless of how the voting goes. If the Dems in PA, OH, MI, and WI can’t steal sufficient votes to turn 2016 round, the likes if Richard J. Daley will be spinning in their graves.

  7. God – this is the America I was born in a half century ago?

    A Faggot narrowly beats a Commie well ahead of an impostor Injun, a corrupt Senile Geezer and a “Klobuchar”, which sounds like a peripheral part of a Czech steam engine, with some Hawaiian Hindoo and a Chink way down in the mix?

    • LOL: William Badwhite
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Laurence Whelk

    No, the Commie beat the CIA faggot, though the corrupt media helped them lie about it for three days.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    , @Kronos
    @Laurence Whelk

    Don’t forget the Wall Street Billionaire. Who’s very jealous of the TV show/real estate billionaire that became US President.

  8. Revenge of the silent non-woke majority? Most of the PoC candidates are gone, and the only one mouthing a fair amount of woke platitudes is Warren, with the woke eyeing “Wine Cave” Pete and “Rogan-endorsed” Bernie suspiciously. Looks like the woke are a paper tiger, without the influence they and their fervent critics think they have.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Bumpkin

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/03/us/elections/results-iowa-caucus-live-updates.html


    In bilingual Spanish caucuses, Sanders swept up huge support. Turnout was in the hundreds, not thousands, but may prove to be the crucial boost he bet on.
     

    The Sanders push to organize these new "satellite caucuses" is paying off. They pushed for caucuses in mosques, heavily Latino areas and universities.
     

    Replies: @Louis Renault

    , @SFG
    @Bumpkin

    The media pays a lot more attention to Twitter than they should. A couple of the more moderate NYT op-ed people have commented on this.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Barnard

    , @Lot
    @Bumpkin

    The first choice of the woke was NY Sen Gillibrand, who cancel-mobbed Al Franken. She not did better than 1% in the polls so gave up right before getting a debate non-invite.

  9. @bomag
    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @The Alarmist, @Twodees Partain

    It’s a lucky for the party that their favorite happened to win by a hair in the final tally. But luck favors those who are in charge of the counting.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Hypnotoad666

    'He who counts the votes wins.' - Boss Tweed

  10. I dunno … can Iowa give us this?

  11. @Hypnotoad666
    @bomag

    It's a lucky for the party that their favorite happened to win by a hair in the final tally. But luck favors those who are in charge of the counting.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    ‘He who counts the votes wins.’ – Boss Tweed

  12. @R.G. Camara
    Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary's email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he's a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that's before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Polynikes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Dennis Dale, @Pericles

    the Gay Version of Obama

    Uh, didn’t we already have that? Also starring Michelle-O as Juwanna Mann.

    • LOL: Kronos
    • Replies: @BB753
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    OK, then a gayer version of Obama, if that's even possible!

    , @Steve in Greensboro
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Boystown Barry is still in the closet (not too effectively, if you ask me). Pete the Cheat is openly gay, so he would be the first one of those.

    That is if Butters were ever to become president. Which is about as likely as my becoming president.

  13. @anon
    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it's true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. "Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts", etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Mr McKenna, @Reg Cæsar, @Justvisiting, @MBlanc46

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    • Replies: @Redneck farmer
    @Hypnotoad666

    Election fraud is a time honored tradition of the Democratic party.

    , @danand
    @Hypnotoad666


    “The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.”
     
    Hypnotoad, that’s exactly as I recall. Never read anything concerning a recount, nor any protest: guess it’s all just magic/voodoo elections from here on out in California.
    , @JR.Ewing.78
    @Hypnotoad666

    In 2018 I felt like I should have been scandalized more by this when it was happening, but the Minnesota "check out all these extra Al Franken ballots we found hidden around town" travesty pretty much eliminated my capacity for scandailzation in these matters. They'll do whatever they have to do to push their candidates over the finish line and they've shown it time and again. It should not be surprising by now.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Prester John

    , @Alfa158
    @Hypnotoad666

    And that was the subtle way of cheating. If that doesn’t work, maybe the Dems will go to the all out blatant stuff used back East in the traditional Democrat machine run cities.

    https://www.wnd.com/2016/12/recount-uncovers-serious-fraud-in-detroit/#V6h9jBWy7bDp3piE.99

    Obviously the workers in Blue precincts were running each paper ballot through the scanning machine an average of six times before dropping it into the ballot box.

    , @Moses
    @Hypnotoad666

    I ran a polling station in San Francisco in the 2000s. There were pretty much zero accounting controls on the ballots, zero oversight, zero anything. Thousands of unmarked ballots were sitting in my apartment for weeks. I could have done anything with them.

    Not only that, anyone off the street could vote. They didn't need to be on our list of names nor show any ID.

    I could have perpetrated crazy fraud. I can only imagine what an organized, experienced and motivated group could do if they ran all the stations in a city.

  14. ‘Pete Buttigieg is the Juan Guaido of America’: Lee Camp calls out conspiracy of ‘intentional chaos’ by Dem establishment

    While partial results released by the party on Tuesday evening with 62 percent of precincts reporting showed Buttigieg in a slight lead over Sanders, it was still too close to call.

    Just as it did for the US plot to install Guaido, media is running cover for the collapse-the-caucus scam, Camp observed, pointing to a shocking lack of curiosity from mainstream outlets regarding the actual outcome of the vote in Iowa. No exit polls, no attempts to even try to talk to anyone involved in the process, just “move on, that was yesterday, who even remembers Iowa!” Quoting an actual NBC story, he read, “It’s like Iowa never happened.”

    But maybe we are all being unfair to Pete?

    In any case, M.A.D. Magazine folded too early.

    • Replies: @indocon
    @El Dato

    If we win the house this year, next year there should be a national standard for Federal elections, early voting has to start no earlier than the previous Sunday to Election Day, all absentee ballots must be mailed in with post marks or dropped at a polling place in the 3-4 days window before Election Day, no vote harvesting, and a Vote ID. With where things are heading, I really see a 1924 like opportunity to do things the would have been impossible to believe just a few years back.

  15. there are a couple of other ways of counting the vote in Iowa

    Oh, vee haff ways all right. The worst thing about the Iowa fiasco isn’t that it lays bare how foul–and open to abuse–the system is. It’s that even after exposure like this, the dust will settle and we’ll return to the status quo ante as though nothing ever happened. Too many fingers in the cake.

    • Agree: Thea
  16. @anon
    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it's true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. "Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts", etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Mr McKenna, @Reg Cæsar, @Justvisiting, @MBlanc46

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    It’s finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I’m sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @Mr McKenna

    The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause.

    A fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling issue also ought to give them pause.

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    , @Boethiuss
    @Mr McKenna


    It’s finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I’m sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.
     
    Why would they? Unemployment is under 4% and growth is over 2% for some number straight quarters (and for the most part over 3%). The only thing keeping the Dems in the game is that they get to run against Trump.

    Replies: @Neoconned

    , @MBlanc46
    @Mr McKenna

    Or if they didn’t know they had ways to win other than getting more votes.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  17. Buttigieg campaign paid firm that developed voting app blamed for Iowa caucus delays

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/buttigieg-campaign-paid-firm-that-developed-voting-app-blamed-for-iowa-caucus-delays

    But who names a company Shadow? That makes CIA conspiracy theories irresistible.

    The young’ns might enjoy SHADO, Supreme Headquarters Alien Defense Organization.

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
    @George

    VD has collected a couple interesting stories about how bad the app is:

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/02/soros-is-not-buying-best-and-brightest.html

    It's funny reading the developers analyzing the app trying to be charitable.

    For his part, the Shadow CEO does a nice job blaming old people.

    , @Thirdtwin
    @George

    “But who names a company Shadow?”

    Better than “Gaslight”, I reckon.

    Replies: @Kronos

    , @Buck Ransom
    @George

    The Culinary Institute of America was really annoyed that they couldn't turn
    Evan McMullin into a thing in 2016, so for 2020 they went all the way in with a gay Howdy-Doody lookalike named ButtPlug backed up by a vote-counting app that is jerry-rigged to tilt in his favor. The spooks are just trolling us now and having an absolute blast doing it.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  18. @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    Election fraud is a time honored tradition of the Democratic party.

  19. Contrarian take: let’s celebrate amateurism? Only in the US is there such a messy, baroque, uncertain process. It’s a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system. But otherwise the chaos of primaries with dozens of silly-looking candidates earnestly debating, with an uncertain outcome and complicated and buggy and local process, produces interesting results, and gave us an unexpected result like Trump.

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…

    PS: I loved how the NYT was predicting an 80% chance of Buttigieg winning with 71% of ballots counted, but now it has a 60% chance that Bernie wins. Or something… O Fake News! And statistics…

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @European-American


    It’s a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system.
     
    Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries. Where you see multi-party ballots are in small, more homogeneous places like Denmark.

    Even in the one state with third-party-friendly laws, New York, it's rare to see one win. Has it happened since James Buckley 50 years ago?

    And he had great "help" from Roger Goodell's father!

    Replies: @Anonymous, @European-American

    , @Kronos
    @European-American


    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…
     
    It’s one of those things when some people see only chaos while others see secretive control. I still can’t make up my mind on which. Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole) but there is a big electoral paradigm shift happening within both parties. The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    https://youtu.be/sJ8agbmQhGo

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Desiderius, @The Wild Geese Howard

    , @J.Ross
    @European-American

    Controlling the CIA, the FBI, the Pentagon and the State Department (and giving adhered-to instructions to the MSM) at their most chaotic (and in the case of the media, ignored) pretty much is "everything."

    , @moshe
    @European-American

    Hey! I like your optimisim!

    I know this is hardly the place for it but between you and me let me thought-experiment the even more optimistic view that it's pretty good that our system isn't overly democratic and allows TPTB certain vetos and whatnot.

    I mean life is pretty good these days.

    The world has been around and humans have been playing on it for a long time and we're more or less living in the best of times and in one of the most secure countries during this pretty cool time.

    Parliamentary systems are more democratic but as Trump told Bibi during their press conference together "you guys need to fix that". (Or something like that. It was classic Trump chutzpah. It was awesome.)

    I don't implicitly trust the shadowy DC Lifers and Lobbyists and whomever else has massive undemocratic powers but I can't complain about the results with too much confidence. Who knows what a more democratic system would wring? In theory I can imagine all kinds if awesomenesses: A more selective immigration program, a system that didn't allow us to have hundreds of black no-go zones, universal very basic income, complete freedom of speech, a more humane prison system, no coordinated extralegal pushes for gaydom or whatever, etc.

    But who knows if that's what we'd get?

    The Germans are a pretty intelligent people and they democraticked themselves a literal (well, The Literal) Nazi government.

    So, I'm pretty cheery about how things are going. Sure, lots of things could and should be better but a WHOLE lot of things could be way way way worse.

    So, hey, fellas running the world, a few things you've done peeve me but overall, 5 Stars. Thanks guys!!

  20. @bomag
    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @The Alarmist, @Twodees Partain

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    True dat!

    Iowa may just be a dress rehearsal for the General Election in November.

  21. @Mr McKenna
    @anon



    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.
     
    It's finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I'm sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Boethiuss, @MBlanc46

    The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause.

    A fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling issue also ought to give them pause.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Harry Baldwin

    The increasing unaffordability of medical care and now housing is a compelling, indeed life-and-death issue. They could run on that if they weren’t ginning up resentment of normal people, traditional families, and white Americans who do not hate themselves and their culture.

    Of course, the Dems’ unlimited Third World Immigration position — and the population explosion, poverty, and overcrowding it brings — makes it impossible to even ameliorate these crises for Americans, but let’s not focus on that. They’re progressive, after all, and their (alleged) intentions and feelings are what matter.

  22. Anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bumpkin
    Revenge of the silent non-woke majority? Most of the PoC candidates are gone, and the only one mouthing a fair amount of woke platitudes is Warren, with the woke eyeing "Wine Cave" Pete and "Rogan-endorsed" Bernie suspiciously. Looks like the woke are a paper tiger, without the influence they and their fervent critics think they have.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @SFG, @Lot

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/03/us/elections/results-iowa-caucus-live-updates.html

    In bilingual Spanish caucuses, Sanders swept up huge support. Turnout was in the hundreds, not thousands, but may prove to be the crucial boost he bet on.

    The Sanders push to organize these new “satellite caucuses” is paying off. They pushed for caucuses in mosques, heavily Latino areas and universities.

    • Replies: @Louis Renault
    @Anonymous

    How many mosques are there in Iowa? Did Louis Farrakhan have some people move in or are these more fine people from those superior countries we keep hearing about?

    Replies: @anon, @duncsbaby

  23. Steve,

    I’d be remiss if I didn’t bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    • Replies: @Cucksworth
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    I visited CWRU (CMUs) sister school twice. When the football coach picked me up from Hopkins, we took the parkway back to campus. When my parents drove, we saw the sprawling hood.

    , @Technite78
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    "Comments disabled for this story"

    Whenever I see that appended to an article, it is almost certain that it is wholly propaganda and intentionally blind to facts.

    , @Laurence Whelk
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    I took a look at the offending Carnegie Mellon Univ. neighborhood map. The only problem I see is that they should have put little skull-and-crossbones images where the black neighborhoods are.

    Humor aside, a lot of prestigious universities are surrounded by some very dark and dangerous neighborhoods and the schools are not giving their students an honest assessment and adequate warning (I know this firsthand because I attend one). Since there is no way the campus security departments don’t know about the increasing level of crime and violence committed against their students, are they perhaps guilty of criminal negligence?

    https://twitter.com/MsInfluenchill/status/1225077206570934272

    , @Joe Stalin
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    Maybe CMU is inspired by the French Ministry's US city warnings?


    French Ministry’s travel warnings for U.S. cities draw criticism

    By Victoria Taylor
    NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
    Nov 16, 2013

    News that the French Ministry website was warning travelers to steer clear of some U.S. cities has caused outrage and confusion among officials.

    The list, which includes advisories and safety tips for New York, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles, also mentioned certain areas and neighborhoods. This angered the leaders of three Cleveland suburbs -- Cleveland Heights, Euclid and Lakewood, Ohio -- who said they were unfairly called out.

    "The French government is foolish and doesn't know what they're talking about," Cleveland Heights mayor Edward Kelley told Cleveland.com on Thursday. "Our crime is down, and it's one of the safest cities in Ohio based on FBI crime statistics."

    Euclid Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Sheila Gibbons also questioned who was responsible for compiling the list.

    "Anyone who reads this that's from the area will think it's absurd," she told Cleveland.com. "It's either someone's sordid opinion or they haven't been here and are lazy. It doesn't make any sense."



    The French Ministry has since changed the Cleveland entry to caution visitors from going out at night and traveling to "some Northeast suburban neighborhoods."

    Another surprising addition to the list was Richmond, Va. The previous round up (see a screenshot of what it looked like on Wednesday here) advised visitors to avoid downtown Richmond "on foot."

    "That's pretty ridiculous," resident Jim Zarling told WRIC. "This is one of the greatest cities I've ever lived in."

    Virginia's capital is no longer included on the list.

    An earlier warning for Washington, D.C., cautioned tourists to stay away from Union Station at night. It also said, "Le quartier Anacostia n'est pas recommandable de jour comme de nuit." This roughly translates to "Don't go to Anacostia, day or night."

    The French Ministry's updated advisory tells citizens to avoid Northeast and Southeast Washington, D.C.

    A sentence about Baltimore being "considered a dangerous city except downtown" has been removed.

    The warnings regarding New York, Boston and Los Angeles remain largely unchanged.

    Visiting New York? The French Ministry still advises travelers to be "vigilant" in tourist destinations like the Statue of Liberty and Times Square. It also says to avoid going to Harlem, the Bronx and Central Park by yourself at night.

    Those traveling to Boston shouldn't walk around at night in Dorchester, Mattapan and Roxbury, the embassy says. Visitors should also be careful of "petty crime" in Chinatown, Fenway and the North End.

    French citizens visiting Los Angeles should be careful in tourist areas like Hollywood, Venice Beach, Long Beach and Santa Monica, and stay away from Watts, Inglewood and Florence.

    The Ministry urges people visiting Detroit to stay away from the center of the city "after the close of business," and says that tourists in Chicago should avoid the west side and anywhere south of 59th Street.

    The U.S. State Department also issues travel warnings to alert Americans of the dangers of visiting certain places. For example, the government discourages people from traveling to Iraq and North Korea, as well as certain parts of Mexico. You can see the full list of advisories here
     
    .
    , @notsaying
    @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

    I see by the article that Carnegie Mellon now says they are in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood. That is a change. I don't know when or why they did that. Squirrel Hill is right next door to campus but Carnegie Mellon was always still considered Oakland.

    Their Zip Code is still 15213 though and the 15213 Zip Code is for the Oakland section of Pittsburgh, where the University of Pittsburgh is located.

    Zip Code 15213 was always known for Pitt, for Carnegie Mellon and for the Carnegie Hall, Museum and Library cultural area located between the two schools.

    Zip Code 15217 was always Squirrel Hill and known as being the Jewish section of Pittsburgh.

    This is very strange.

  24. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    If that’s your notion of “ideal” I’d hate to see your idea of……

  25. @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    “The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.”

    Hypnotoad, that’s exactly as I recall. Never read anything concerning a recount, nor any protest: guess it’s all just magic/voodoo elections from here on out in California.

  26. @Anonymous
    @Bumpkin

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/03/us/elections/results-iowa-caucus-live-updates.html


    In bilingual Spanish caucuses, Sanders swept up huge support. Turnout was in the hundreds, not thousands, but may prove to be the crucial boost he bet on.
     

    The Sanders push to organize these new "satellite caucuses" is paying off. They pushed for caucuses in mosques, heavily Latino areas and universities.
     

    Replies: @Louis Renault

    How many mosques are there in Iowa? Did Louis Farrakhan have some people move in or are these more fine people from those superior countries we keep hearing about?

    • Replies: @anon
    @Louis Renault

    How many mosques are there in Iowa?

    Some. Probably not many. Besides...no mosques required. Just nice midwestern ladies like this.

    https://youtu.be/ffwAyzpcGTQ


    News:
    The DNC is asking the Iowa D's to review their paperwork.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/buttigieg-sanders-neck-neck-iowa-nearly-all-votes-reported-n1131261

    By the way, Joe Biden looks like he's auditioning for a cameo in some version of "Walking Dead".

    , @duncsbaby
    @Louis Renault

    How many mosques are there in Iowa?

    One is too many and I'm sure there's probably more than one. Hell even ND w/one third the pop. of Iowa has at least 2 that I know of.

    According to this list, there are 20 mosques/Islamic centers in Iowa:

    https://mosquelist.blogspot.com/2010/08/mosques-in-iowa-usa_10.html

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  27. @Divine Right
    Maybe a better policy than flipping a coin to break delegate ties would be to choose the candidate with the longer last name. Most presidential elections in recent history have been won by the candidate with the longer surname (popular vote 20 times from 1876 - 1960), although the last election broke that pattern. But then again, usually the taller candidate wins. In this case, Pete has the longer last name ... but the same number of letters as Sanders if first names are also included; it all tends to blur together on a ballot anyway. Both leading candidates would be tied assuming both names are counted ... and Sanders would get the double tiebreaker because he's taller. That's a lot faster than a messy recount. It also has some statistical -- albeit fringe -- efficacy in picking a winner in the general election. /s

    Replies: @Aardvark, @Justvisiting

    Maybe they could just bitch-slap each other Stewie vs. Bertram style…

  28. And the winner is : NOT Sanders. Not even a little bit. Sanders totally didn’t win at all. That settles it. Nothing to see here, move along folks.

  29. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Bard of Bumperstickers


    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.
     
    Better yet, via expulsion. Practice on Puerto Rico. Then start with Hawaii Hawai'i, which we stole, remember. Then, California, but keeping San Diego and the Shastas.

    Replies: @Anon, @Bard of Bumperstickers

  30. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    Steve,

    I'd be remiss if I didn't bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    Replies: @Cucksworth, @Technite78, @Laurence Whelk, @Joe Stalin, @notsaying

    I visited CWRU (CMUs) sister school twice. When the football coach picked me up from Hopkins, we took the parkway back to campus. When my parents drove, we saw the sprawling hood.

  31. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @R.G. Camara


    the Gay Version of Obama
     
    Uh, didn’t we already have that? Also starring Michelle-O as Juwanna Mann.

    Replies: @BB753, @Steve in Greensboro

    OK, then a gayer version of Obama, if that’s even possible!

    • LOL: Harry Baldwin
  32. @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    In 2018 I felt like I should have been scandalized more by this when it was happening, but the Minnesota “check out all these extra Al Franken ballots we found hidden around town” travesty pretty much eliminated my capacity for scandailzation in these matters. They’ll do whatever they have to do to push their candidates over the finish line and they’ve shown it time and again. It should not be surprising by now.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @JR.Ewing.78

    Al Franken ballots? Didn't this SNL - created progressive bite the dust years back in the first wave of #MeToo purges? Somehow the Dems booted him out.

    I thought we were banned from forevermore mentioning his sullied name?

    , @Prester John
    @JR.Ewing.78

    Whenever I hear of election fraud I still think back to Chicago, November, 1960, when Mayor Richard ("Vote early and often") cooked the books in favor of JFK (giving new meaning to the name "Cook County"--which later changed to "Crook County"). And the kicker is that Nixon never contested it. Election fraud? Like political corruption itself it's ld business which probably dates back to Greco-Roman.

    Replies: @lysias

  33. @R.G. Camara
    Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary's email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he's a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that's before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Polynikes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Dennis Dale, @Pericles

    His supporters are pretty naive anyways, so I find this whole thing endlessly amusing.

  34. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    Assume there are 10 voting districts with 100 people each. There is a referendum which premise states that five of the voting districts will not pay any tax and the other five will pay all taxes. Four of the five districts which won’t pay tax vote 100% for the premise and one district votes 51% against. In each of the other five districts the vote is 80% against the premise.
    The popular vote is 400 + 49 + 100 = 549 or 54.9% of the vote. The referendum passes and one half of the voting districts are screwed.
    If instead each voting district has one electoral vote then the vote would be 6 to 4 against the premise.
    Which is the correct outcome?

    • Thanks: Cloudbuster
    • Replies: @Sideshow Bob
    @Bit Head

    Which district do I live in?

  35. @R.G. Camara
    Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary's email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he's a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that's before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Polynikes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Dennis Dale, @Pericles

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    He’s the US version of Emmanuel Maricón…sorry…Macron.

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
  36. @George
    Buttigieg campaign paid firm that developed voting app blamed for Iowa caucus delays

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/buttigieg-campaign-paid-firm-that-developed-voting-app-blamed-for-iowa-caucus-delays

    But who names a company Shadow? That makes CIA conspiracy theories irresistible.

    The young'ns might enjoy SHADO, Supreme Headquarters Alien Defense Organization.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qDy4OMAkgY

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thirdtwin, @Buck Ransom

    VD has collected a couple interesting stories about how bad the app is:

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/02/soros-is-not-buying-best-and-brightest.html

    It’s funny reading the developers analyzing the app trying to be charitable.

    For his part, the Shadow CEO does a nice job blaming old people.

  37. @Harry Baldwin
    @Mr McKenna

    The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause.

    A fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling issue also ought to give them pause.

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    The increasing unaffordability of medical care and now housing is a compelling, indeed life-and-death issue. They could run on that if they weren’t ginning up resentment of normal people, traditional families, and white Americans who do not hate themselves and their culture.

    Of course, the Dems’ unlimited Third World Immigration position — and the population explosion, poverty, and overcrowding it brings — makes it impossible to even ameliorate these crises for Americans, but let’s not focus on that. They’re progressive, after all, and their (alleged) intentions and feelings are what matter.

  38. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    Equally interesting would be a 269-269 electoral college tie. In that case, the president would be elected by the incoming House and the VP by the incoming Senate. But don’t break out the champagne yet Dems – the rule is that the House gets one vote per state delegation – so fifty votes in total. Yep, California with its 47 Dem representatives gets the same vote as Wyoming with its one Pub representative. And I believe that at least currently, the Pubs control more states in the House than the Dems do.

  39. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    Steve,

    I'd be remiss if I didn't bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    Replies: @Cucksworth, @Technite78, @Laurence Whelk, @Joe Stalin, @notsaying

    “Comments disabled for this story”

    Whenever I see that appended to an article, it is almost certain that it is wholly propaganda and intentionally blind to facts.

  40. Bernie, vis-a-vis the other candidates, really isn’t that awful. Personally, I would have liked to have seen more support for the other heterodox Dem candidates like Yang and Gabbard, but this is at least a step in the right direction away feom neocon policies wrapped up in wokeness. Not to say that Bernie doesn’t do “woke,” but he’s a lot more policy focused (along with Yang and Gabbard). Shifting political discourse towards actually substantive issues would be nice, and the Republicans need competition on this front.

    Regarding his policies, to say they have some problems is a vast understatement. Still, if I had to pick my poison, Bernie’s policies would be a minor disaster compared to the catastrophe that the Uniparty wants. Fairly moot point though, the Dems have all but guaranteed Trump’s reelection at this point.

    Policy issues aside, I do have a grudging respect for Bernie. He’s an Independent who’s forced the Dems to play nice with him; to go up against them and not bow is impressive.

  41. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    I’d like to add that during a debate Trump’s opponent ask him to abide by the outcome and not contest the election, and Trump shooting back that his opponent do the same.

    (Trump, PBUH, did miss the chance to do this to Hillary during the debates).

  42. OT:Titania speaks.

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    @Dtbb

    Lots of remarks about religion, sects, cults, the early Christians, theology - and Titania McGrath - radical intersectionalist activist healer women. Stunning. Andrew Boyle is the Satirist of our days of the Cult of Irrationality & Anger & Grievances and Aggressions and...!!

  43. You’ve gotta admit, John, that WAS pretty egregious. Imagine how many tourist rubes from Vermont or Kentucky have been mugged and maybe murdered already due to the lack of that important information!

  44. @Bumpkin
    Revenge of the silent non-woke majority? Most of the PoC candidates are gone, and the only one mouthing a fair amount of woke platitudes is Warren, with the woke eyeing "Wine Cave" Pete and "Rogan-endorsed" Bernie suspiciously. Looks like the woke are a paper tiger, without the influence they and their fervent critics think they have.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @SFG, @Lot

    The media pays a lot more attention to Twitter than they should. A couple of the more moderate NYT op-ed people have commented on this.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @SFG

    https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1225309956511084546?s=20

    Yeah, Ross discovering this the (very) hard way this week. Even the moderates got sucked in.

    Replies: @EdwardM

    , @Barnard
    @SFG

    Who are the moderate NY Times opinion people? David Brooks and Ross Douthat are the only ones are the only ones to the right of Bernie and Elizabeth Warren. Brooks has been openly cheering for a Biden Presidency. Douthat is a Twitter junkie, what good would it do for him to mention this?

  45. My personal not-exactly-a-conspiracy theory:

    While this Iowa fiasco knocks the Dems back onto the ropes, they’ll get their second wind and try to use it their advantage.

    Step one will be to blame Trump. They’ve already started with claiming Trump supporters flooded the toll free number (or something) so that results could not be called in.

    Next week it will be Russians or Russian bots. Book it.

    Finally, come November, in any close swing state they’ll throw up their hands and say, “Look, these elections are just so chaotic and difficult to police, we need to keep counting and re-counting and re-voting and whatnot until we find the requisite number of ballots or a judge just declares us the winner. Because “democracy.” In short, they’re planting the seed that this “voting” stuff is just unmanageable, so the only solution is… We win!

  46. @SFG
    @Bumpkin

    The media pays a lot more attention to Twitter than they should. A couple of the more moderate NYT op-ed people have commented on this.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Barnard

    Yeah, Ross discovering this the (very) hard way this week. Even the moderates got sucked in.

    • Replies: @EdwardM
    @Desiderius

    Except the Dems' smear campaign against Kavanaugh probably would have worked: President Romney would have pulled the plug on him.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  47. I can’t believe none of you big brains have figured out what happened yet. Who are the Russians most frightened of? Bootigieg, of course. He’s a military man, a cunning linguist, and financial analyst. He can pick up Russian in weekend, the writing system in a solid 45 minutes crash course. He is ready to replay the Rape of Russia! Putin is terrified of this deep state Superman, and Putin approves of Bernie, because Vladimir either wants a new Soviet Union, or he knows that socialism will cripple America. There is no way Putes could not feel the burn.

    He knows Petiegieg will win in Iowa, how could a fellow spook lose in the heartland? So what does he do? Hack the Dumbocrat caucus app, causing it to fail. The days of counting, combined with das booteigieg totally not suspicious relationship with Shadow declaring his well-earned victory before it technically is won or stolen fair and square will hurt puss ‘n bootesigieg momentum, and cast a shadow that will follow him through to New Hampshire, hurting his campaign there.

    Putin is the real threat here. We have to destroy our democracy to save it, folks.

    • LOL: Abe
    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @Rob

    If Buttigieg gets elected, will Steve Colbert say, "The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster,” as he did with Trump?

    Replies: @Russ

  48. anon[296] • Disclaimer says:

    VICE analyzes the phone app created by Shadow, asks software security people questions, the details are not too nerdy.

    https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/3a8ajj/an-off-the-shelf-skeleton-project-experts-analyze-the-app-that-broke-iowa

    tl;dr
    The app wasn’t fully tested, was still being updated just a couple of weeks ago, had some data formatting issues, and looks like a student project. It also cost the Iowa D’s about $63,000.

    Perez of the DNC has ruled that no other state caucuses will use the phone app.

    • Replies: @anon
    @anon

    A lot of the criticism of the app has been oversimplified, focusing on scalability, specific technologies, security, etc. The engineers in the article seem pretty clueless, or come across as researchers who don't write production code.

    The issue was with data engineering, specifically in transferring the data to the local Democratic party. If you deal with data in small legacy business systems, they are often brittle, and prone to silent failure -- i.e., you upload data to the system, it says "success", then it quietly discards portions of the data. Additionally, the people who maintain these systems are not exactly eager to change or improve anything. One small, "unintentional" tweak by a lazy "admin" (often some dude overseeing little more than a spreadsheet), and everything goes FUBAR.

    The other area involved making the app usable for non-tech-savvy octogenarians. Not exactly the easiest thing to do.

    They also had hard business constraints, since if they missed this election cycle, it would likely kill the startup. Add in some diversity-hire engineers and the results aren't shocking. That being said, many of the domain experts criticizing Shadow would probably make the same mistakes, unless they had exposure to this area.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Jack D

  49. Yeah, Florida 2000.

    The grand spectacle, when everyone watched with astonishment the counting of hanging chads.
    When 537 Florida men and women decided the fate of the world.

    It is nice when people still remember the good old times 😉

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
    @another anon

    Virgin Gore vs pregnant Chad

  50. @SFG
    @Bumpkin

    The media pays a lot more attention to Twitter than they should. A couple of the more moderate NYT op-ed people have commented on this.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Barnard

    Who are the moderate NY Times opinion people? David Brooks and Ross Douthat are the only ones are the only ones to the right of Bernie and Elizabeth Warren. Brooks has been openly cheering for a Biden Presidency. Douthat is a Twitter junkie, what good would it do for him to mention this?

  51. @Bumpkin
    Revenge of the silent non-woke majority? Most of the PoC candidates are gone, and the only one mouthing a fair amount of woke platitudes is Warren, with the woke eyeing "Wine Cave" Pete and "Rogan-endorsed" Bernie suspiciously. Looks like the woke are a paper tiger, without the influence they and their fervent critics think they have.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @SFG, @Lot

    The first choice of the woke was NY Sen Gillibrand, who cancel-mobbed Al Franken. She not did better than 1% in the polls so gave up right before getting a debate non-invite.

  52. The left snarls that the Republicans are the white man’s party. But let’s say Joe Biden limps into South Carolina and wins. Won’t this prove that there is a white Democrat party and a black Democrat party?

  53. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    Steve,

    I'd be remiss if I didn't bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    Replies: @Cucksworth, @Technite78, @Laurence Whelk, @Joe Stalin, @notsaying

    I took a look at the offending Carnegie Mellon Univ. neighborhood map. The only problem I see is that they should have put little skull-and-crossbones images where the black neighborhoods are.

    Humor aside, a lot of prestigious universities are surrounded by some very dark and dangerous neighborhoods and the schools are not giving their students an honest assessment and adequate warning (I know this firsthand because I attend one). Since there is no way the campus security departments don’t know about the increasing level of crime and violence committed against their students, are they perhaps guilty of criminal negligence?

  54. Iowa and Indiana must be jurisdictionally sequestered from the rest of the USA and then they must be legally removed form the Unites States of America and then the land in Iowa and Indiana can be legally considered territorial or protectorate status and therefore legally available for settlement and pioneering and land claiming.

    Many decent Americans have never been convinced that Indiana actually exists at all, so making all the land in Indiana open for the taking will be an easy thing to do.

    A baby boomer money-grubber propaganda pop star arsehole not named Bruce Springsteen has once again proven that the baby boomers are the most mentally deranged spiteful MUTANTS ever to be born or reside in the USA or colonial America. Even the filthy women-hating boobs in the hinterlands of Boston who were burning women because they were a little bit nutty or slutty or wacko or spinster type slags getting on people’s nerves are nowhere close to being as crack smoker crazy as these damned dastardly baby boomer boobs from the bowels of generational Hell.

    [MORE]

    Of course I’m talking about the boastful baby boomer bastard from Indiana named John Cougar Mellencamp who immodestly claimed that people were looking over their shoulders to watch his crappy Indiana dance moves. They were making sure you didn’t knock over the punch bowl table with all that gin in the punch, Johnny, they weren’t impressed by your Indiana arsehole dancing.

    This baby boomer money-grubber dickweed douche named Johnny Mellencamp has used his status as a self-professed “small town” guy to endorse Jew New Yorker billionaire Wall Street Shyster Mike Bloomberg for president.

    I hereby state that baby boomer Indiana arsehole Johnny Mellencamp can go drive or fly like a rich guy to Lake Michigan and JUMP the Hell in!

    OUTRAGEOUS CRAP FROM INDIANA MELLENCAMP BASTARD!

    Bruce Springsteen and Mellencamp Johhny are anti-worker and anti-American and they are baby boomer globalizer money-grubber thieves who have stolen the future of young people in the USA.

    R — O — C — K in the U — S — A? Screw You, Mellencamp!

    Baby Boomer arseholes like Johnny Mellencamp are brutally destroying the future of young people and then taunting them and rubbing their noses in it with his scandalous endorsement of Mike Bloomberg!

    Mellencamp is a horrible money-grubbing baby boomer pop star tart!

    If Indiana doesn’t actually exist, what is the best way to stake some claim to a few hundred thousand acres out there? This is a fascinating legal question about grabbing land and buildings that are real from a state that might not exist. I’m going through my Blackstone right now!

    Piss Off Mellencamp!

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Charles Pewitt


    Even the filthy women-hating boobs in the hinterlands of Boston who were burning women
     
    Nobody was burned in New England, they were hanged. Nobody was drawn and quartered, either, except for Joshua Tefft and King Philip.

    As for "boobs" weren't they turned in by other women?
    , @Cloudbuster
    @Charles Pewitt

    "Hallelujah! Holy shit! Where's the Tylenol?"

  55. The big story is Biden’s shocker. I somehow doubt he’ll drop out to benefit Buttplug.

  56. If elected candidate, I predict Buttplug won’t do well with either Blacks or Hispanics. Sanders would do better with Hispanics, who are natural socialists, but just as bad with Blacks.
    With current demographics, Dems won’t have the numbers to win until 2024. From then on, the Democratic Party will turn into the American PRI (80 years of rule in Mexico).

  57. Anon[897] • Disclaimer says:

    OT: Coronavirus. Looking at the notion that ACE 2 gene expression increases if you’re a smoker, thus creating more pathways for Coronavirus to overwhelm you, much of Asia, Russia, and the Middle East has a lot of male smokers. They’re going to get hammered by the virus, and I project a high death rate among males of these populations. In China, almost half the men smoke. By contrast, only 20% of Indian males smoke. Chinese women are more vulnerable than they should be because many of them will have a higher expression of ACE 2 just from second-hand smoke from living with male smokers, and because the air in Eastern China is so polluted.

    Eastern Europe and Russia are in a different sort of trouble because they have high smoking rates among both men and women. I foresee a lot of Russian and Eastern European deaths.

    The New World, oddly enough, doesn’t smoke as much as the old (despite being where tobacco originated). Death rates should be lower, though South American countries like Chile will get hammered. There’s a gigantic skew in the male-female smoking ratios in many countries around the world, especially Mideast ones, that will leave a lot of the male sex dead and the female living.

    I have begun to wonder how much of a role smoking played in the deaths during the 1918 Spanish Flu. There is no data on whether that virus took advantage of many smoke-damaged lungs during their period to find a pathway inside to infect tissue. It might explain why middle-aged adults and serviceman died at high rates, but children didn’t, if the virus found smokers easier to kill.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @Anon

    According to a very detailed book about the "Spanish" flu of 1918-22, the main population hardest hit was young men below 25. Mainly because they had been rounded up (drafted) into overcrowded military camps which even the Army docs had warned against. Also on the WWI front. Later spread to every remote nook and cranny, those by supply ship.

    Don't know about smoking but at that age some did, many didn't. The book explained that the nature of that particular virus created such a strong antibody reaction that those who contracted it died of the reaction, flooding the lungs, etc. Those who had never been exposed to flu (and the younger ones) died more quickly. Too much natural reaction.

    So not mainly old, smokers, etc. Though some of those also died. It was highly contagious and until post war victory parades and crowds were banned, it spread widely.

    Subsequent flu outbreaks don't have this extremely violent immune system reaction, so far.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  58. @European-American
    Contrarian take: let's celebrate amateurism? Only in the US is there such a messy, baroque, uncertain process. It's a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system. But otherwise the chaos of primaries with dozens of silly-looking candidates earnestly debating, with an uncertain outcome and complicated and buggy and local process, produces interesting results, and gave us an unexpected result like Trump.

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background... Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome...

    PS: I loved how the NYT was predicting an 80% chance of Buttigieg winning with 71% of ballots counted, but now it has a 60% chance that Bernie wins. Or something... O Fake News! And statistics...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Kronos, @J.Ross, @moshe

    It’s a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system.

    Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries. Where you see multi-party ballots are in small, more homogeneous places like Denmark.

    Even in the one state with third-party-friendly laws, New York, it’s rare to see one win. Has it happened since James Buckley 50 years ago?

    And he had great “help” from Roger Goodell’s father!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Reg Cæsar

    Brazil has something like 30 different parties.

    Replies: @Dave3

    , @European-American
    @Reg Cæsar

    > Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries

    Germany, France, and Italy beg to differ...

    In Germany, Die Linke, AFD, and the FDP are an important factor beyond CDU and SPD.

    In France, the two-party system exploded: RN, LREM, FI are all bigger than the Socialists and the Right coalition that had been top dogs. LREM is in power.

    In Italy, well, I don't claim to understand, but there's a lot of parties, and a fairly new party called Five Star is still in power.

    Even in the UK, UKIP and the Liberal Party have played a significant role.

    Historically, the US is exceptional in the general stability of its political system and in the way power is shared by two parties.

    And of course there's a balance: stability at one level allows chaos at another level.

  59. @anon
    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it's true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. "Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts", etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Mr McKenna, @Reg Cæsar, @Justvisiting, @MBlanc46

    The situation in Iowa is amusing

    No, it isn’t. If this can happen in one of the cleanest and most efficient states, then there is no escaping corruption anywhere.

    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    @Reg Cæsar

    I think Trump needs to talk to Barr about investigating election corruption. This is the perfect time. Otherwise things are just going to get a lot worse.

  60. @Divine Right
    Maybe a better policy than flipping a coin to break delegate ties would be to choose the candidate with the longer last name. Most presidential elections in recent history have been won by the candidate with the longer surname (popular vote 20 times from 1876 - 1960), although the last election broke that pattern. But then again, usually the taller candidate wins. In this case, Pete has the longer last name ... but the same number of letters as Sanders if first names are also included; it all tends to blur together on a ballot anyway. Both leading candidates would be tied assuming both names are counted ... and Sanders would get the double tiebreaker because he's taller. That's a lot faster than a messy recount. It also has some statistical -- albeit fringe -- efficacy in picking a winner in the general election. /s

    Replies: @Aardvark, @Justvisiting

    Maybe a better policy than flipping a coin to break delegate ties would be to choose the candidate with the longer last name.

    I think in the future the Democrats will award all ties to the candidate who can document the most perverted sex acts.

  61. @anon
    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it's true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. "Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts", etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Mr McKenna, @Reg Cæsar, @Justvisiting, @MBlanc46

    In my state in the general election the urban areas have certain precincts hold reporting any results until after the rest of the state has counted.

    These precincts ban any white folks that are not well armed members of organized crime, so there can be no monitoring of the “new” ballots that mysteriously appear after midnight (if needed).

    Think of it as democracy in action.

  62. @Reg Cæsar
    @anon


    The situation in Iowa is amusing
     
    No, it isn't. If this can happen in one of the cleanest and most efficient states, then there is no escaping corruption anywhere.

    Replies: @Ozymandias

    I think Trump needs to talk to Barr about investigating election corruption. This is the perfect time. Otherwise things are just going to get a lot worse.

  63. #MayorCheat takes IA!

    Does anyone find it ironic that the party that elects their nominee via “delegates” is the same party that wants to abolish the electoral college?

    • Replies: @Rob
    @JUSA

    Buttigieg and his husband Cheaten (nee Chasten)

  64. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    Steve,

    I'd be remiss if I didn't bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    Replies: @Cucksworth, @Technite78, @Laurence Whelk, @Joe Stalin, @notsaying

    Maybe CMU is inspired by the French Ministry’s US city warnings?

    French Ministry’s travel warnings for U.S. cities draw criticism

    By Victoria Taylor
    NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
    Nov 16, 2013

    News that the French Ministry website was warning travelers to steer clear of some U.S. cities has caused outrage and confusion among officials.

    The list, which includes advisories and safety tips for New York, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles, also mentioned certain areas and neighborhoods. This angered the leaders of three Cleveland suburbs — Cleveland Heights, Euclid and Lakewood, Ohio — who said they were unfairly called out.

    “The French government is foolish and doesn’t know what they’re talking about,” Cleveland Heights mayor Edward Kelley told Cleveland.com on Thursday. “Our crime is down, and it’s one of the safest cities in Ohio based on FBI crime statistics.”

    Euclid Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Sheila Gibbons also questioned who was responsible for compiling the list.

    “Anyone who reads this that’s from the area will think it’s absurd,” she told Cleveland.com. “It’s either someone’s sordid opinion or they haven’t been here and are lazy. It doesn’t make any sense.”

    The French Ministry has since changed the Cleveland entry to caution visitors from going out at night and traveling to “some Northeast suburban neighborhoods.”

    Another surprising addition to the list was Richmond, Va. The previous round up (see a screenshot of what it looked like on Wednesday here) advised visitors to avoid downtown Richmond “on foot.”

    “That’s pretty ridiculous,” resident Jim Zarling told WRIC. “This is one of the greatest cities I’ve ever lived in.”

    Virginia’s capital is no longer included on the list.

    An earlier warning for Washington, D.C., cautioned tourists to stay away from Union Station at night. It also said, “Le quartier Anacostia n’est pas recommandable de jour comme de nuit.” This roughly translates to “Don’t go to Anacostia, day or night.”

    The French Ministry’s updated advisory tells citizens to avoid Northeast and Southeast Washington, D.C.

    A sentence about Baltimore being “considered a dangerous city except downtown” has been removed.

    The warnings regarding New York, Boston and Los Angeles remain largely unchanged.

    Visiting New York? The French Ministry still advises travelers to be “vigilant” in tourist destinations like the Statue of Liberty and Times Square. It also says to avoid going to Harlem, the Bronx and Central Park by yourself at night.

    Those traveling to Boston shouldn’t walk around at night in Dorchester, Mattapan and Roxbury, the embassy says. Visitors should also be careful of “petty crime” in Chinatown, Fenway and the North End.

    French citizens visiting Los Angeles should be careful in tourist areas like Hollywood, Venice Beach, Long Beach and Santa Monica, and stay away from Watts, Inglewood and Florence.

    The Ministry urges people visiting Detroit to stay away from the center of the city “after the close of business,” and says that tourists in Chicago should avoid the west side and anywhere south of 59th Street.

    The U.S. State Department also issues travel warnings to alert Americans of the dangers of visiting certain places. For example, the government discourages people from traveling to Iraq and North Korea, as well as certain parts of Mexico. You can see the full list of advisories here

    .

  65. I told you “Pete J Buttigieg is the Patrick J Buchanan of Iowa.” That one’s mine and it’s totally getting stolen.
    ———-
    By way of Breitbart:
    Vassar neo-Stasis drum circle up a phantom Klan.
    https://miscellanynews.org/2019/11/14/features/workshop-aims-to-undo-racism/

    We looked into each other’s souls

    SCIENCE! Sorry, back to the excerpt:

    We looked into each other’s souls as we discussed hardships and shared truths. For some spotting racism is easy, while for others it comes to light that racism is not always this blatant use of the n-word or making someone sit in the back of the bus. It’s oppression. It’s a lack of opportunities. Racism is thinking you are being progressive by allowing a Black child into your predominantly white school, but not wanting your white child to attend a predominantly Black school.

    Interestingly, the instructors did not focus on the possibility of dismantling race in an attempt to establish equality. PISAB defines racism as ‘racial prejudice + power.’ With this in mind, there were no interjections when the instructors stated, ‘All white people are racist.’ Sitting in this imperfect circle, each participant motionless in their seats, the words reverberate around the room. Can this controversial statement initiate the beginning of change?

  66. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    You want a civil war?

    That’s how you get civil war. It would be pretty based if you ask me tho

  67. If any person at this site predicted the Democrats would rig the Iowa caucuses, there is a distinct possibility I may have indicated my opinion that person was an idiot.

    In which case I would like to extend my sincere apologies. Mea culpa….

  68. @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    And that was the subtle way of cheating. If that doesn’t work, maybe the Dems will go to the all out blatant stuff used back East in the traditional Democrat machine run cities.

    https://www.wnd.com/2016/12/recount-uncovers-serious-fraud-in-detroit/#V6h9jBWy7bDp3piE.99

    Obviously the workers in Blue precincts were running each paper ballot through the scanning machine an average of six times before dropping it into the ballot box.

  69. @Reg Cæsar
    @European-American


    It’s a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system.
     
    Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries. Where you see multi-party ballots are in small, more homogeneous places like Denmark.

    Even in the one state with third-party-friendly laws, New York, it's rare to see one win. Has it happened since James Buckley 50 years ago?

    And he had great "help" from Roger Goodell's father!

    Replies: @Anonymous, @European-American

    Brazil has something like 30 different parties.

    • Replies: @Dave3
    @Anonymous

    Argentina has 10 different political parties, all of which use the word "socialist" in their name or platform. So unless you stay home or your ballot is declared invalid, you're voting for socialism!

  70. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    Best timeline.

  71. @Anon
    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump's opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump's opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @Bit Head, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Lugash, @Svevlad, @Daniel Chieh, @Boethiuss

    The ideal outcome for the 2020 election to me would be for Trump to win by a single electoral college vote, cast by a faithless elector who was elected for Trump, but cast his vote for Trump’s opponent, then the whole thing goes to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-4 decisions Gorsuch writes the opinion forcing the guy to change his vote back, and as a bonus, through some sort of electoral college magic, the popular vote has Trump’s opponent getting 30 million more votes than Trump, with Trump claiming the 30 million were illegals.

    That would definitely have the most comic value, but for us it would be better if the Democrat lost 55-44 or whatever. Because if that happened, in some important ways the Dems would be disempowered as well as objectively defeated.

    Trump is doing a lot better now than he was six months ago, and contrary to my view then he looks more likely to win than lose in November. But even if he does, the fact that he turns off so many people means that we’re not going to be as strong as we should be.

  72. @Mr McKenna
    @anon



    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.
     
    It's finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I'm sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Boethiuss, @MBlanc46

    It’s finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I’m sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    Why would they? Unemployment is under 4% and growth is over 2% for some number straight quarters (and for the most part over 3%). The only thing keeping the Dems in the game is that they get to run against Trump.

    • Replies: @Neoconned
    @Boethiuss

    Sort of.

    There are close to 100 million Americans"not in the labor force"....depends how you measure unemployment.....

  73. Bernie can’t win, no matter what “to the powers that be….”

    If he beats Trump they’ll Oswald him. Wall Street won’t allow the chance that like in Japan the executive branch re-nationalizes the printing presses.

    Much less if college becomes free all the fast food workers, hotel workers etc will vacate their overpriced apartments for dorms and cause real estate prices to stagnate AND labor costs will rise due to the labor shortage as every one quits the Bush service economy for a chance to learn a trade.

    That means lots of businesses reliant on corporate welfare from the govt because they rely on cheap labor fail amd the loans and bonds backing them go bad and we go into a Japan style malaise of deflation….Wall St cant have the average dolt getting ahead.

    Like what JFKs mom said….whats the point in being rich if poor people have opportunity too?

  74. @Charles Pewitt
    Iowa and Indiana must be jurisdictionally sequestered from the rest of the USA and then they must be legally removed form the Unites States of America and then the land in Iowa and Indiana can be legally considered territorial or protectorate status and therefore legally available for settlement and pioneering and land claiming.

    Many decent Americans have never been convinced that Indiana actually exists at all, so making all the land in Indiana open for the taking will be an easy thing to do.

    A baby boomer money-grubber propaganda pop star arsehole not named Bruce Springsteen has once again proven that the baby boomers are the most mentally deranged spiteful MUTANTS ever to be born or reside in the USA or colonial America. Even the filthy women-hating boobs in the hinterlands of Boston who were burning women because they were a little bit nutty or slutty or wacko or spinster type slags getting on people's nerves are nowhere close to being as crack smoker crazy as these damned dastardly baby boomer boobs from the bowels of generational Hell.

    Of course I'm talking about the boastful baby boomer bastard from Indiana named John Cougar Mellencamp who immodestly claimed that people were looking over their shoulders to watch his crappy Indiana dance moves. They were making sure you didn't knock over the punch bowl table with all that gin in the punch, Johnny, they weren't impressed by your Indiana arsehole dancing.

    This baby boomer money-grubber dickweed douche named Johnny Mellencamp has used his status as a self-professed "small town" guy to endorse Jew New Yorker billionaire Wall Street Shyster Mike Bloomberg for president.

    I hereby state that baby boomer Indiana arsehole Johnny Mellencamp can go drive or fly like a rich guy to Lake Michigan and JUMP the Hell in!

    OUTRAGEOUS CRAP FROM INDIANA MELLENCAMP BASTARD!

    Bruce Springsteen and Mellencamp Johhny are anti-worker and anti-American and they are baby boomer globalizer money-grubber thieves who have stolen the future of young people in the USA.

    R -- O -- C -- K in the U -- S -- A? Screw You, Mellencamp!

    Baby Boomer arseholes like Johnny Mellencamp are brutally destroying the future of young people and then taunting them and rubbing their noses in it with his scandalous endorsement of Mike Bloomberg!

    Mellencamp is a horrible money-grubbing baby boomer pop star tart!

    If Indiana doesn't actually exist, what is the best way to stake some claim to a few hundred thousand acres out there? This is a fascinating legal question about grabbing land and buildings that are real from a state that might not exist. I'm going through my Blackstone right now!

    Piss Off Mellencamp!

    https://twitter.com/johnmellencamp/status/1225102646857650184?s=20

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Cloudbuster

    Even the filthy women-hating boobs in the hinterlands of Boston who were burning women

    Nobody was burned in New England, they were hanged. Nobody was drawn and quartered, either, except for Joshua Tefft and King Philip.

    As for “boobs” weren’t they turned in by other women?

  75. @Boethiuss
    @Mr McKenna


    It’s finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don’t have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I’m sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.
     
    Why would they? Unemployment is under 4% and growth is over 2% for some number straight quarters (and for the most part over 3%). The only thing keeping the Dems in the game is that they get to run against Trump.

    Replies: @Neoconned

    Sort of.

    There are close to 100 million Americans”not in the labor force”….depends how you measure unemployment…..

  76. The official lie is now that Russian hackers and alt-right incels at 4chan are to blame for Iowa, and the CIA and Clintonite vote-tallying contractor calling itself SHADOW is nothing-to-see-here. Granting this preposterous notion we are left in about the same place: I guess absolutely nothing has been done by the selfless heroes who would defend us from the hordes of the steppe.

    • Replies: @Bugg
    @J.Ross

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls. Nobody expected guys aping the Jerky Boys to ruin your Iowa caucus.

    Replies: @anon, @Pericles

  77. https://www.yahoo.com/news/iowa-woman-wanted-vote-changed-learning-buttigieg-gay-212028604.html

    Iowa woman wanted vote changed after learning Buttigieg is gay

    Des Moines (United States) (AFP) – An Iowa woman who supported Pete Buttigieg for president in the tumultuous US Democratic caucus asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.

    “Are you saying that he has a same-sex partner? Are you kidding?” the woman, wearing a “Pete 2020” sticker, asked a caucus organizer, known as a precinct captain, in rural Iowa on Monday evening.

    “Well then I don’t want anybody like that in the White House. So can I have my card back?”
    ……………………..

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Bardon Kaldian


    An Iowa woman ... asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.
     

    There always has to be one!

    So you vote for the best known political homosexual since the later Roman emperors, without knowing he is gay? And then you cite your religious beliefs as a reason for you to have a mulligan?

    Are you by any chance a Muslim? Where do the candidates stand on contraception? What about abortion? What about circumcision for boys vs girls? What is a just war? Where do you stand on leprosy or quarantine for corona virus victims? Should heretics be burned at the stake or just hanged?

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Replies: @Russ, @Reg Cæsar, @Anon

  78. There’s not going to be a Florida 2000-Like 35 Day Recount. There’s nothing in it for the Democrats and the media dances to its tune. Even if there is a recount you are not going to be seeing breathless moment by moment headlines about it. It’s going to be memory holed because this whole debacle helps only Trump. They are already saying, “forget Iowa, on to New Hampshire”. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
  79. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/michael-lind-on-populism-racism-and-restoring-democracy

    Lind thinks attacks on President Trump have grown out of proportion and that the élites he scorns are engaged in a “Brown Scare” of trying to make Americans feel endangered by white Trump voters. He calls the belief that Trump was signalling his approval for white nationalism after the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville a “conspiracy theory” and bemoans “asymmetrical multiculturalism,” under which the “appreciation of minority and immigrant traditions is often coupled with élite contempt for the ancestral traditions of white native and white immigrant subcultures.”

    This is direct (uncredited of course) from Moldbug and Adams.

    • Replies: @fnn
    @Desiderius

    Way before Moldbug:
    https://reason.com/2013/05/13/a-brown-scare-at-the-irs/


    A Brown Scare is like a Red Scare, except its anxieties involve the right rather than the left; the historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term in his 1983 book The Old Christian Right.
     
    https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/9623

    The conference reminded me of an example of wartime suppression of civil liberties that deserves more attention from historians: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944. The case began when the attorney general, after much pestering by FDR, decided to stage a show trial of about thirty assorted critics of the war. The defendants were a mixture of serious minded-isolationists and crackpots. The Department of Jusice used the The Smith Act to accuse them of promoting insubordination in the armed forces. The DOJ's case was ludicrous and the trial gradually collapsed into chaos and farce.

    In his important, book, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War, historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term"Brown scare" to characterize how FDR and his allies used these tactics to suppress dissent by smearing right wing critics as disloyal.

    Many on the left, of course, suffered the same fate several years later under the hammer of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, Joe McCarthy's Senate committee, and the same Smith Act that had provided the basis for the Sedition Trial. In 1944, however, the Communist party and many New Deal liberals strongly applauded the trial and other witch hunts of the Brown Scare and called for even tougher action.
     

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius

  80. @JUSA
    #MayorCheat takes IA!

    Does anyone find it ironic that the party that elects their nominee via "delegates" is the same party that wants to abolish the electoral college?

    Replies: @Rob

    Buttigieg and his husband Cheaten (nee Chasten)

  81. anon[223] • Disclaimer says:
    @Louis Renault
    @Anonymous

    How many mosques are there in Iowa? Did Louis Farrakhan have some people move in or are these more fine people from those superior countries we keep hearing about?

    Replies: @anon, @duncsbaby

    How many mosques are there in Iowa?

    Some. Probably not many. Besides…no mosques required. Just nice midwestern ladies like this.

    News:
    The DNC is asking the Iowa D’s to review their paperwork.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/buttigieg-sanders-neck-neck-iowa-nearly-all-votes-reported-n1131261

    By the way, Joe Biden looks like he’s auditioning for a cameo in some version of “Walking Dead”.

  82. @George
    Buttigieg campaign paid firm that developed voting app blamed for Iowa caucus delays

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/buttigieg-campaign-paid-firm-that-developed-voting-app-blamed-for-iowa-caucus-delays

    But who names a company Shadow? That makes CIA conspiracy theories irresistible.

    The young'ns might enjoy SHADO, Supreme Headquarters Alien Defense Organization.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qDy4OMAkgY

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thirdtwin, @Buck Ransom

    “But who names a company Shadow?”

    Better than “Gaslight”, I reckon.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Thirdtwin

    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro, @Hypnotoad666

  83. Get ready for President Buttplug. The same methods the Deep/Derp state piloted in Iowa against Sandernista, Comrade Bernie will be used against Trump.

    The elites will not tolerate Trump and his deplorables. It’s Macron all over again and expect punitive green taxes and other measures to get YT and especially White men.

    Open borders forever wars that are never won, endless wokery, it’s all guaranteed.

    Heck Buttgig has an app for virtual serfdom of deplorables. He’s got an app for everything.

  84. @El Dato
    ‘Pete Buttigieg is the Juan Guaido of America’: Lee Camp calls out conspiracy of ‘intentional chaos’ by Dem establishment

    While partial results released by the party on Tuesday evening with 62 percent of precincts reporting showed Buttigieg in a slight lead over Sanders, it was still too close to call.

    Just as it did for the US plot to install Guaido, media is running cover for the collapse-the-caucus scam, Camp observed, pointing to a shocking lack of curiosity from mainstream outlets regarding the actual outcome of the vote in Iowa. No exit polls, no attempts to even try to talk to anyone involved in the process, just “move on, that was yesterday, who even remembers Iowa!” Quoting an actual NBC story, he read, “It’s like Iowa never happened.”

     

    But maybe we are all being unfair to Pete?

    In any case, M.A.D. Magazine folded too early.

    Replies: @indocon

    If we win the house this year, next year there should be a national standard for Federal elections, early voting has to start no earlier than the previous Sunday to Election Day, all absentee ballots must be mailed in with post marks or dropped at a polling place in the 3-4 days window before Election Day, no vote harvesting, and a Vote ID. With where things are heading, I really see a 1924 like opportunity to do things the would have been impossible to believe just a few years back.

  85. @Bit Head
    @Anon

    Assume there are 10 voting districts with 100 people each. There is a referendum which premise states that five of the voting districts will not pay any tax and the other five will pay all taxes. Four of the five districts which won't pay tax vote 100% for the premise and one district votes 51% against. In each of the other five districts the vote is 80% against the premise.
    The popular vote is 400 + 49 + 100 = 549 or 54.9% of the vote. The referendum passes and one half of the voting districts are screwed.
    If instead each voting district has one electoral vote then the vote would be 6 to 4 against the premise.
    Which is the correct outcome?

    Replies: @Sideshow Bob

    Which district do I live in?

  86. @bomag
    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.

    Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @The Alarmist, @Twodees Partain

    “Unleashed against themselves, the generated feed-back loop could devour the universe.”

    …Or, it could break the internet at the very least. Good line, there.

  87. @Laurence Whelk
    God - this is the America I was born in a half century ago?

    A Faggot narrowly beats a Commie well ahead of an impostor Injun, a corrupt Senile Geezer and a “Klobuchar”, which sounds like a peripheral part of a Czech steam engine, with some Hawaiian Hindoo and a Chink way down in the mix?

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Kronos

    No, the Commie beat the CIA faggot, though the corrupt media helped them lie about it for three days.

    • LOL: Laurence Whelk
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Desiderius

    This CIA faggot, to be precise:

    https://twitter.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/1225513321459339265?s=20

    See also:

    https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1225538117760954371?s=20

  88. @Laurence Whelk
    God - this is the America I was born in a half century ago?

    A Faggot narrowly beats a Commie well ahead of an impostor Injun, a corrupt Senile Geezer and a “Klobuchar”, which sounds like a peripheral part of a Czech steam engine, with some Hawaiian Hindoo and a Chink way down in the mix?

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Kronos

    Don’t forget the Wall Street Billionaire. Who’s very jealous of the TV show/real estate billionaire that became US President.

  89. @Charles Pewitt
    Iowa and Indiana must be jurisdictionally sequestered from the rest of the USA and then they must be legally removed form the Unites States of America and then the land in Iowa and Indiana can be legally considered territorial or protectorate status and therefore legally available for settlement and pioneering and land claiming.

    Many decent Americans have never been convinced that Indiana actually exists at all, so making all the land in Indiana open for the taking will be an easy thing to do.

    A baby boomer money-grubber propaganda pop star arsehole not named Bruce Springsteen has once again proven that the baby boomers are the most mentally deranged spiteful MUTANTS ever to be born or reside in the USA or colonial America. Even the filthy women-hating boobs in the hinterlands of Boston who were burning women because they were a little bit nutty or slutty or wacko or spinster type slags getting on people's nerves are nowhere close to being as crack smoker crazy as these damned dastardly baby boomer boobs from the bowels of generational Hell.

    Of course I'm talking about the boastful baby boomer bastard from Indiana named John Cougar Mellencamp who immodestly claimed that people were looking over their shoulders to watch his crappy Indiana dance moves. They were making sure you didn't knock over the punch bowl table with all that gin in the punch, Johnny, they weren't impressed by your Indiana arsehole dancing.

    This baby boomer money-grubber dickweed douche named Johnny Mellencamp has used his status as a self-professed "small town" guy to endorse Jew New Yorker billionaire Wall Street Shyster Mike Bloomberg for president.

    I hereby state that baby boomer Indiana arsehole Johnny Mellencamp can go drive or fly like a rich guy to Lake Michigan and JUMP the Hell in!

    OUTRAGEOUS CRAP FROM INDIANA MELLENCAMP BASTARD!

    Bruce Springsteen and Mellencamp Johhny are anti-worker and anti-American and they are baby boomer globalizer money-grubber thieves who have stolen the future of young people in the USA.

    R -- O -- C -- K in the U -- S -- A? Screw You, Mellencamp!

    Baby Boomer arseholes like Johnny Mellencamp are brutally destroying the future of young people and then taunting them and rubbing their noses in it with his scandalous endorsement of Mike Bloomberg!

    Mellencamp is a horrible money-grubbing baby boomer pop star tart!

    If Indiana doesn't actually exist, what is the best way to stake some claim to a few hundred thousand acres out there? This is a fascinating legal question about grabbing land and buildings that are real from a state that might not exist. I'm going through my Blackstone right now!

    Piss Off Mellencamp!

    https://twitter.com/johnmellencamp/status/1225102646857650184?s=20

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Cloudbuster

    “Hallelujah! Holy shit! Where’s the Tylenol?”

  90. @Dtbb
    OT:Titania speaks.
    https://youtu.be/NIxhH85cQMY

    Replies: @Dieter Kief

    Lots of remarks about religion, sects, cults, the early Christians, theology – and Titania McGrathradical intersectionalist activist healer women. Stunning. Andrew Boyle is the Satirist of our days of the Cult of Irrationality & Anger & Grievances and Aggressions and…!!

  91. Is this the power of women leading countries?
    Thanks to Angela Merkel, Germany will lead the free world in female genital mutilation. GIRL POWER!

    https://www.dw.com/en/female-genital-mutilation-feels-like-living-in-a-dead-body/a-52269987

    “I wanted to go to the toilet, but something wasn’t right. I couldn’t walk and was in considerable pain. When I saw what she had done, I was shocked. She’d cut everything open and then sewn it closed. I had no idea what to do.”

    More than 70,000 women living in Germany have undergone FGM, and 17,000 girls are thought to be at risk. These numbers are rising, Dr. Strunz says, because more people from the FGM Zone* have been migrating to Germany in recent years.

    *Whatever could be meant by this?

  92. anon[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon
    VICE analyzes the phone app created by Shadow, asks software security people questions, the details are not too nerdy.

    https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/3a8ajj/an-off-the-shelf-skeleton-project-experts-analyze-the-app-that-broke-iowa

    tl;dr
    The app wasn't fully tested, was still being updated just a couple of weeks ago, had some data formatting issues, and looks like a student project. It also cost the Iowa D's about $63,000.

    Perez of the DNC has ruled that no other state caucuses will use the phone app.

    Replies: @anon

    A lot of the criticism of the app has been oversimplified, focusing on scalability, specific technologies, security, etc. The engineers in the article seem pretty clueless, or come across as researchers who don’t write production code.

    The issue was with data engineering, specifically in transferring the data to the local Democratic party. If you deal with data in small legacy business systems, they are often brittle, and prone to silent failure — i.e., you upload data to the system, it says “success”, then it quietly discards portions of the data. Additionally, the people who maintain these systems are not exactly eager to change or improve anything. One small, “unintentional” tweak by a lazy “admin” (often some dude overseeing little more than a spreadsheet), and everything goes FUBAR.

    The other area involved making the app usable for non-tech-savvy octogenarians. Not exactly the easiest thing to do.

    They also had hard business constraints, since if they missed this election cycle, it would likely kill the startup. Add in some diversity-hire engineers and the results aren’t shocking. That being said, many of the domain experts criticizing Shadow would probably make the same mistakes, unless they had exposure to this area.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @anon

    Use. Fucking. Paper.

    What value are you clowns exactly adding here?

    Replies: @Hibernian

    , @Jack D
    @anon

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn't get their "app" certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You're lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn't have to be a "app" to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn't have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate "app" for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these "apps" on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kronos, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Jonathan Mason

  93. @Rob
    I can’t believe none of you big brains have figured out what happened yet. Who are the Russians most frightened of? Bootigieg, of course. He’s a military man, a cunning linguist, and financial analyst. He can pick up Russian in weekend, the writing system in a solid 45 minutes crash course. He is ready to replay the Rape of Russia! Putin is terrified of this deep state Superman, and Putin approves of Bernie, because Vladimir either wants a new Soviet Union, or he knows that socialism will cripple America. There is no way Putes could not feel the burn.

    He knows Petiegieg will win in Iowa, how could a fellow spook lose in the heartland? So what does he do? Hack the Dumbocrat caucus app, causing it to fail. The days of counting, combined with das booteigieg totally not suspicious relationship with Shadow declaring his well-earned victory before it technically is won or stolen fair and square will hurt puss ‘n bootesigieg momentum, and cast a shadow that will follow him through to New Hampshire, hurting his campaign there.

    Putin is the real threat here. We have to destroy our democracy to save it, folks.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin

    If Buttigieg gets elected, will Steve Colbert say, “The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster,” as he did with Trump?

    • LOL: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Russ
    @Harry Baldwin


    If Buttigieg gets elected, will Steve Colbert say, “The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster,” as he did with Trump?
     
    Seeking truth from Colbert is fruitless. Even when fruit are involved.
  94. @JR.Ewing.78
    @Hypnotoad666

    In 2018 I felt like I should have been scandalized more by this when it was happening, but the Minnesota "check out all these extra Al Franken ballots we found hidden around town" travesty pretty much eliminated my capacity for scandailzation in these matters. They'll do whatever they have to do to push their candidates over the finish line and they've shown it time and again. It should not be surprising by now.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Prester John

    Al Franken ballots? Didn’t this SNL – created progressive bite the dust years back in the first wave of #MeToo purges? Somehow the Dems booted him out.

    I thought we were banned from forevermore mentioning his sullied name?

  95. @Anon
    OT: Coronavirus. Looking at the notion that ACE 2 gene expression increases if you're a smoker, thus creating more pathways for Coronavirus to overwhelm you, much of Asia, Russia, and the Middle East has a lot of male smokers. They're going to get hammered by the virus, and I project a high death rate among males of these populations. In China, almost half the men smoke. By contrast, only 20% of Indian males smoke. Chinese women are more vulnerable than they should be because many of them will have a higher expression of ACE 2 just from second-hand smoke from living with male smokers, and because the air in Eastern China is so polluted.

    Eastern Europe and Russia are in a different sort of trouble because they have high smoking rates among both men and women. I foresee a lot of Russian and Eastern European deaths.

    The New World, oddly enough, doesn't smoke as much as the old (despite being where tobacco originated). Death rates should be lower, though South American countries like Chile will get hammered. There's a gigantic skew in the male-female smoking ratios in many countries around the world, especially Mideast ones, that will leave a lot of the male sex dead and the female living.

    I have begun to wonder how much of a role smoking played in the deaths during the 1918 Spanish Flu. There is no data on whether that virus took advantage of many smoke-damaged lungs during their period to find a pathway inside to infect tissue. It might explain why middle-aged adults and serviceman died at high rates, but children didn't, if the virus found smokers easier to kill.

    Replies: @Muggles

    According to a very detailed book about the “Spanish” flu of 1918-22, the main population hardest hit was young men below 25. Mainly because they had been rounded up (drafted) into overcrowded military camps which even the Army docs had warned against. Also on the WWI front. Later spread to every remote nook and cranny, those by supply ship.

    Don’t know about smoking but at that age some did, many didn’t. The book explained that the nature of that particular virus created such a strong antibody reaction that those who contracted it died of the reaction, flooding the lungs, etc. Those who had never been exposed to flu (and the younger ones) died more quickly. Too much natural reaction.

    So not mainly old, smokers, etc. Though some of those also died. It was highly contagious and until post war victory parades and crowds were banned, it spread widely.

    Subsequent flu outbreaks don’t have this extremely violent immune system reaction, so far.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Muggles

    https://youtu.be/jbkSRLYSojo

  96. @JR.Ewing.78
    @Hypnotoad666

    In 2018 I felt like I should have been scandalized more by this when it was happening, but the Minnesota "check out all these extra Al Franken ballots we found hidden around town" travesty pretty much eliminated my capacity for scandailzation in these matters. They'll do whatever they have to do to push their candidates over the finish line and they've shown it time and again. It should not be surprising by now.

    Replies: @Muggles, @Prester John

    Whenever I hear of election fraud I still think back to Chicago, November, 1960, when Mayor Richard (“Vote early and often”) cooked the books in favor of JFK (giving new meaning to the name “Cook County”–which later changed to “Crook County”). And the kicker is that Nixon never contested it. Election fraud? Like political corruption itself it’s ld business which probably dates back to Greco-Roman.

    • Replies: @lysias
    @Prester John

    Explanation I heard was that an investigation would have exposed all the Republican fraud downstate.

  97. @anon
    @anon

    A lot of the criticism of the app has been oversimplified, focusing on scalability, specific technologies, security, etc. The engineers in the article seem pretty clueless, or come across as researchers who don't write production code.

    The issue was with data engineering, specifically in transferring the data to the local Democratic party. If you deal with data in small legacy business systems, they are often brittle, and prone to silent failure -- i.e., you upload data to the system, it says "success", then it quietly discards portions of the data. Additionally, the people who maintain these systems are not exactly eager to change or improve anything. One small, "unintentional" tweak by a lazy "admin" (often some dude overseeing little more than a spreadsheet), and everything goes FUBAR.

    The other area involved making the app usable for non-tech-savvy octogenarians. Not exactly the easiest thing to do.

    They also had hard business constraints, since if they missed this election cycle, it would likely kill the startup. Add in some diversity-hire engineers and the results aren't shocking. That being said, many of the domain experts criticizing Shadow would probably make the same mistakes, unless they had exposure to this area.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Jack D

    Use. Fucking. Paper.

    What value are you clowns exactly adding here?

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    @Desiderius

    The whole business of hanging chads, apps that fail, etc., could be largely avoided by going back to voting machines (strictly mechanical.) It'd be slower than electronics, but faster than paaper ballots.

  98. @anon
    @anon

    A lot of the criticism of the app has been oversimplified, focusing on scalability, specific technologies, security, etc. The engineers in the article seem pretty clueless, or come across as researchers who don't write production code.

    The issue was with data engineering, specifically in transferring the data to the local Democratic party. If you deal with data in small legacy business systems, they are often brittle, and prone to silent failure -- i.e., you upload data to the system, it says "success", then it quietly discards portions of the data. Additionally, the people who maintain these systems are not exactly eager to change or improve anything. One small, "unintentional" tweak by a lazy "admin" (often some dude overseeing little more than a spreadsheet), and everything goes FUBAR.

    The other area involved making the app usable for non-tech-savvy octogenarians. Not exactly the easiest thing to do.

    They also had hard business constraints, since if they missed this election cycle, it would likely kill the startup. Add in some diversity-hire engineers and the results aren't shocking. That being said, many of the domain experts criticizing Shadow would probably make the same mistakes, unless they had exposure to this area.

    Replies: @Desiderius, @Jack D

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn’t get their “app” certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You’re lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn’t have to be a “app” to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn’t have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate “app” for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these “apps” on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn’t organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Kronos
    @Jack D

    Don’t they use corn for these kind of things?

    https://static.politico.com/41/85/9725bbfb49f9aa1baca01fbdc300/151103-iowa-voting-ap-1160.jpg

    Replies: @Ron Mexico

    , @The Wild Geese Howard
    @Jack D


    They couldn’t get their “app” certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded.
     
    Yup.

    The Iowa caucus folks had to download it from "TestFairy.com."

    Apparently, you can make this shit up.

    As a sidenote, the SHADOW contact emails use the .io top-level domain, which represents the, "British Indian Ocean Territory."

    That territory happens to contain Diego Garcia, which is used for a lot of black ops in that part of the world.

    Probably nothing.

    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don't want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    Replies: @lysias, @Jack D, @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke

  99. @Muggles
    @Anon

    According to a very detailed book about the "Spanish" flu of 1918-22, the main population hardest hit was young men below 25. Mainly because they had been rounded up (drafted) into overcrowded military camps which even the Army docs had warned against. Also on the WWI front. Later spread to every remote nook and cranny, those by supply ship.

    Don't know about smoking but at that age some did, many didn't. The book explained that the nature of that particular virus created such a strong antibody reaction that those who contracted it died of the reaction, flooding the lungs, etc. Those who had never been exposed to flu (and the younger ones) died more quickly. Too much natural reaction.

    So not mainly old, smokers, etc. Though some of those also died. It was highly contagious and until post war victory parades and crowds were banned, it spread widely.

    Subsequent flu outbreaks don't have this extremely violent immune system reaction, so far.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  100. @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
    Steve,

    I'd be remiss if I didn't bring this staggering article to your attention:

    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: CMU apologizes for excluding historically black communities from tourist map

    https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2020/02/05/Carnegie-Mellon-map-homewood-Hill-District-Lincoln-Lemington-garfield-race-admissions-Pittsburgh/stories/202002050132

    Replies: @Cucksworth, @Technite78, @Laurence Whelk, @Joe Stalin, @notsaying

    I see by the article that Carnegie Mellon now says they are in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood. That is a change. I don’t know when or why they did that. Squirrel Hill is right next door to campus but Carnegie Mellon was always still considered Oakland.

    Their Zip Code is still 15213 though and the 15213 Zip Code is for the Oakland section of Pittsburgh, where the University of Pittsburgh is located.

    Zip Code 15213 was always known for Pitt, for Carnegie Mellon and for the Carnegie Hall, Museum and Library cultural area located between the two schools.

    Zip Code 15217 was always Squirrel Hill and known as being the Jewish section of Pittsburgh.

    This is very strange.

  101. @Jack D
    @anon

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn't get their "app" certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You're lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn't have to be a "app" to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn't have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate "app" for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these "apps" on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kronos, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Jonathan Mason

    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Art Deco


    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.
     
    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    My caucus in St Paul always used pieces of paper the size of Post-It notes. (Yes, in St Paul of all places, they should have used actual Post-It notes. That's like flying flags made in China.)

    If we didn't bring a pen, they'd give us pencils.

    The Berniebots' tactic of using smartphones to collect evidence is the real advantage of digital technology-- to keep things honest.

    *Six or seven hours for Democrats, if Minnesota is anything to go by. But that would give more time to avoid tabulation errors

    Replies: @anon

  102. @Thirdtwin
    @George

    “But who names a company Shadow?”

    Better than “Gaslight”, I reckon.

    Replies: @Kronos

    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.

    • Replies: @Steve in Greensboro
    @Kronos

    "Gaslight" 1944 starring Ingrid Bergman, Charles Boyer and Joseph Cotten. It was in fact filmed in black and white. Also unlike movies of today, it had actors who could actually act and it was not based on a comic book.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp5iPmpZiNE

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @Kronos


    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.
     
    Yes. From the 1944 movie "Gaslight" with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman. I never saw the movie myself but the plot involves a husband trying to make his wife think she is insane for some nefarious reason. When I was a kid I heard the term as an old-timey expression by people in my parents' generation.

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left. It's sort of like the ubiquitous inaudible "dog whistles" that they claim are being sent by republicans as secret signals to the Russians, White Supremacists, and whatnot. The Left needs these cliches to help explain why reality is actually totally different from what you observe with your own lying eyes.

    https://youtu.be/0ToLfQU2xmg

    Replies: @Ozymandias, @anon

  103. @Jack D
    @anon

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn't get their "app" certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You're lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn't have to be a "app" to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn't have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate "app" for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these "apps" on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kronos, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Jonathan Mason

    Don’t they use corn for these kind of things?

    • Replies: @Ron Mexico
    @Kronos

    I notice Trump's jar is the only one filled to the neck of the jar. What is that image from?

    Replies: @Kronos

  104. @R.G. Camara
    Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary's email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he's a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that's before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Polynikes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Dennis Dale, @Pericles

    Bernie’s “bros” should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Dennis Dale


    Bernie’s “bros” should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    Absolutely. Just give the rest of us time to stock up on moar popcorn!

    , @Desiderius
    @Dennis Dale

    https://twitter.com/Chris_arnade/status/1225529876612034564?s=20

  105. There is one adult in the Democrat Party. Tulsi Gabbard.

    To Rush Limbaugh: I and my family send our love and best wishes to you and your loved ones at this difficult moment in your life. May your hearts and minds be filled with and strengthened by God's love.— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) February 4, 2020

    How much flak will she get from the Globalist left crazies for showing compassion to a cancer victim?

    PEACE 😇
    ________

    https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1224532731775741952

  106. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @R.G. Camara


    the Gay Version of Obama
     
    Uh, didn’t we already have that? Also starring Michelle-O as Juwanna Mann.

    Replies: @BB753, @Steve in Greensboro

    Boystown Barry is still in the closet (not too effectively, if you ask me). Pete the Cheat is openly gay, so he would be the first one of those.

    That is if Butters were ever to become president. Which is about as likely as my becoming president.

  107. @Desiderius
    @Laurence Whelk

    No, the Commie beat the CIA faggot, though the corrupt media helped them lie about it for three days.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    This CIA faggot, to be precise:

    See also:

  108. @Kronos
    @Thirdtwin

    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro, @Hypnotoad666

    “Gaslight” 1944 starring Ingrid Bergman, Charles Boyer and Joseph Cotten. It was in fact filmed in black and white. Also unlike movies of today, it had actors who could actually act and it was not based on a comic book.

  109. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.

    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    My caucus in St Paul always used pieces of paper the size of Post-It notes. (Yes, in St Paul of all places, they should have used actual Post-It notes. That’s like flying flags made in China.)

    If we didn’t bring a pen, they’d give us pencils.

    The Berniebots’ tactic of using smartphones to collect evidence is the real advantage of digital technology– to keep things honest.

    *Six or seven hours for Democrats, if Minnesota is anything to go by. But that would give more time to avoid tabulation errors

    • Replies: @anon
    @Reg Cæsar

    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    Did your caucus use an algorithm similar to Iowa? I don't understand what they are doing and how they are getting fractional results. There can't be a fraction of a vote, it's a discrete object - like a fraction of a person.

    I get that Iowa has a two stage process in their caucus, I think that to progress beyond the first round a candidate has to get 15% of the vote. Ok, so 100 people show up, 3 candidates get 20% each, two candidates get 15% each and one gets 10%. So Mr. / Ms. / ? 10% doesn't progress to the second round. Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.

    How can someone get 37.7% of anything? What am I missing?

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

  110. @European-American
    Contrarian take: let's celebrate amateurism? Only in the US is there such a messy, baroque, uncertain process. It's a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system. But otherwise the chaos of primaries with dozens of silly-looking candidates earnestly debating, with an uncertain outcome and complicated and buggy and local process, produces interesting results, and gave us an unexpected result like Trump.

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background... Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome...

    PS: I loved how the NYT was predicting an 80% chance of Buttigieg winning with 71% of ballots counted, but now it has a 60% chance that Bernie wins. Or something... O Fake News! And statistics...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Kronos, @J.Ross, @moshe

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…

    It’s one of those things when some people see only chaos while others see secretive control. I still can’t make up my mind on which. Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole) but there is a big electoral paradigm shift happening within both parties. The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Kronos


    Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole)
     
    Both of whom are 96.

    That's éminence très, très grise.

    Replies: @Kronos

    , @Desiderius
    @Kronos

    Both (chaos and secretive control) works.

    Checks and balances.

    Replies: @Kronos

    , @The Wild Geese Howard
    @Kronos


    The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.
     
    So, the takeaway is that I still have four years to get rich trading.

    Awesome!

    Replies: @Kronos

  111. @Prester John
    @JR.Ewing.78

    Whenever I hear of election fraud I still think back to Chicago, November, 1960, when Mayor Richard ("Vote early and often") cooked the books in favor of JFK (giving new meaning to the name "Cook County"--which later changed to "Crook County"). And the kicker is that Nixon never contested it. Election fraud? Like political corruption itself it's ld business which probably dates back to Greco-Roman.

    Replies: @lysias

    Explanation I heard was that an investigation would have exposed all the Republican fraud downstate.

  112. @Jack D
    @anon

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn't get their "app" certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You're lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn't have to be a "app" to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn't have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate "app" for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these "apps" on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kronos, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Jonathan Mason

    They couldn’t get their “app” certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded.

    Yup.

    The Iowa caucus folks had to download it from “TestFairy.com.”

    Apparently, you can make this shit up.

    As a sidenote, the SHADOW contact emails use the .io top-level domain, which represents the, “British Indian Ocean Territory.”

    That territory happens to contain Diego Garcia, which is used for a lot of black ops in that part of the world.

    Probably nothing.

  113. anon[311] • Disclaimer says:

    The chair of the DNC suggested earlier today that the Iowa D’s check their paperwork.

    Chair of the Iowa D’s to DNC — “Nah”.

    https://nypost.com/2020/02/06/iowa-democratic-party-chair-ignores-dnc-calls-for-recount-of-caucus/

    The only way Iowa D’s will check paperwork is if one of the campaigns in-state asks for it, and Zombie Joe’s angry-birds letter doesn’t count.

  114. @Dennis Dale
    @R.G. Camara

    Bernie's "bros" should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius


    Bernie’s “bros” should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    Absolutely. Just give the rest of us time to stock up on moar popcorn!

  115. @Bardon Kaldian
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/iowa-woman-wanted-vote-changed-learning-buttigieg-gay-212028604.html

    Iowa woman wanted vote changed after learning Buttigieg is gay

    Des Moines (United States) (AFP) - An Iowa woman who supported Pete Buttigieg for president in the tumultuous US Democratic caucus asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.

    "Are you saying that he has a same-sex partner? Are you kidding?" the woman, wearing a "Pete 2020" sticker, asked a caucus organizer, known as a precinct captain, in rural Iowa on Monday evening.

    "Well then I don't want anybody like that in the White House. So can I have my card back?"
    ..........................

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    An Iowa woman … asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.

    There always has to be one!

    So you vote for the best known political homosexual since the later Roman emperors, without knowing he is gay? And then you cite your religious beliefs as a reason for you to have a mulligan?

    Are you by any chance a Muslim? Where do the candidates stand on contraception? What about abortion? What about circumcision for boys vs girls? What is a just war? Where do you stand on leprosy or quarantine for corona virus victims? Should heretics be burned at the stake or just hanged?

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    • Replies: @Russ
    @Jonathan Mason


    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?
     
    Willard Romney would say yes.
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Jonathan Mason


    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?
     
    Yes. Under the very "just war" doctrine you allude to.
    , @Anon
    @Jonathan Mason

    Maybe YOUR gay, did you ever think of that? And yes, most folks around here are God-fearing, God-respecting traditionally-minded people who think that sodomy is a heinous sin as explained in the Bible and every other major religious text. If that's so TRIGGERING to you, maybe find another website for your gaslighting DNC-approved conspiracy theories? Here I'll get you started...

    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

  116. @Jack D
    @anon

    Oh, fer Chrissake, this is not rocket science. As someone pointed out, doing the payroll for a medium sized retail chain is much more complicated.

    They couldn't get their "app" certified for the Apple store in time so it had to be sideloaded. That was already a non-starter. Good luck getting grandma to sideload apps. You're lucky if you can get her to install one the regular way.

    This whole thing didn't have to be a "app" to begin with. Any half decent web designer could have coded a web page for them to accept data securely. If people didn't have access to a PC they could have logged in using their browsers on their phones. Everyone should have done a dry run weeks ago and the whole thing should have been running like clockwork.

    The whole idea that you need a separate "app" for every single thing you do is idiotic. Why do I need all these "apps" on my phone but not on my computer? Businesses do it because they want to keep you in their walled garden and steal your data but what was in it for the Iowa folks? I shudder to think that the future of America rests in the hands of like idiots. These people couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kronos, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Jonathan Mason

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don’t want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    • LOL: fnn
    • Replies: @lysias
    @Jonathan Mason

    What was preventing them from communicating by email?

    , @Jack D
    @Jonathan Mason

    That didn't happen. They're just trying to deflect blame. The calls didn't even
    start until after it all fell apart.

    , @J.Ross
    @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan, why do you believe "reports"?

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    , @Johann Ricke
    @Jonathan Mason


    Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?
     
    This is like that time in the 90's, when South African villains were de rigueur. Election problems? Lost an election? Blame shifty ex-Soviet states.
  117. @Jonathan Mason
    @Bardon Kaldian


    An Iowa woman ... asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.
     

    There always has to be one!

    So you vote for the best known political homosexual since the later Roman emperors, without knowing he is gay? And then you cite your religious beliefs as a reason for you to have a mulligan?

    Are you by any chance a Muslim? Where do the candidates stand on contraception? What about abortion? What about circumcision for boys vs girls? What is a just war? Where do you stand on leprosy or quarantine for corona virus victims? Should heretics be burned at the stake or just hanged?

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Replies: @Russ, @Reg Cæsar, @Anon

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Willard Romney would say yes.

  118. @Harry Baldwin
    @Rob

    If Buttigieg gets elected, will Steve Colbert say, "The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster,” as he did with Trump?

    Replies: @Russ

    If Buttigieg gets elected, will Steve Colbert say, “The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster,” as he did with Trump?

    Seeking truth from Colbert is fruitless. Even when fruit are involved.

  119. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don't want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    Replies: @lysias, @Jack D, @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke

    What was preventing them from communicating by email?

  120. anon[391] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar
    @Art Deco


    The use of digital technology in these matters is gratuitous.
     
    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    My caucus in St Paul always used pieces of paper the size of Post-It notes. (Yes, in St Paul of all places, they should have used actual Post-It notes. That's like flying flags made in China.)

    If we didn't bring a pen, they'd give us pencils.

    The Berniebots' tactic of using smartphones to collect evidence is the real advantage of digital technology-- to keep things honest.

    *Six or seven hours for Democrats, if Minnesota is anything to go by. But that would give more time to avoid tabulation errors

    Replies: @anon

    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    Did your caucus use an algorithm similar to Iowa? I don’t understand what they are doing and how they are getting fractional results. There can’t be a fraction of a vote, it’s a discrete object – like a fraction of a person.

    I get that Iowa has a two stage process in their caucus, I think that to progress beyond the first round a candidate has to get 15% of the vote. Ok, so 100 people show up, 3 candidates get 20% each, two candidates get 15% each and one gets 10%. So Mr. / Ms. / ? 10% doesn’t progress to the second round. Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.

    How can someone get 37.7% of anything? What am I missing?

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.
     
    First, this isn't true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop. Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren't a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    Replies: @anon

  121. @Kronos
    @Thirdtwin

    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.

    Replies: @Steve in Greensboro, @Hypnotoad666

    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.

    Yes. From the 1944 movie “Gaslight” with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman. I never saw the movie myself but the plot involves a husband trying to make his wife think she is insane for some nefarious reason. When I was a kid I heard the term as an old-timey expression by people in my parents’ generation.

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left. It’s sort of like the ubiquitous inaudible “dog whistles” that they claim are being sent by republicans as secret signals to the Russians, White Supremacists, and whatnot. The Left needs these cliches to help explain why reality is actually totally different from what you observe with your own lying eyes.

    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    @Hypnotoad666

    The term had persisted in the psychology community the entire time.

    Replies: @Kronos

    , @anon
    @Hypnotoad666

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left.

    Feminists have been accusing "the patriarchy" of gaslighting for a few years. Personally, I know that any time a woman fumes about "gaslighting" it is obviously projection on her part. Lefties are essentially like women in their "emotions today, emotions tomorrow, emotions forever!" mindset so no surprise that it caught on.

    The obvious irony: constantly rewriting history as the Zinn-left does, is textbook gaslighting.

  122. @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Anon

    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.

    Better yet, via expulsion. Practice on Puerto Rico. Then start with Hawaii Hawai’i, which we stole, remember. Then, California, but keeping San Diego and the Shastas.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Reg Cæsar

    Sierra, not Shastas

    , @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Reg Cæsar

    Both, and more.

    http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2194/Spooner_1485_Bk.pdf

  123. @Jonathan Mason
    @Bardon Kaldian


    An Iowa woman ... asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.
     

    There always has to be one!

    So you vote for the best known political homosexual since the later Roman emperors, without knowing he is gay? And then you cite your religious beliefs as a reason for you to have a mulligan?

    Are you by any chance a Muslim? Where do the candidates stand on contraception? What about abortion? What about circumcision for boys vs girls? What is a just war? Where do you stand on leprosy or quarantine for corona virus victims? Should heretics be burned at the stake or just hanged?

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Replies: @Russ, @Reg Cæsar, @Anon

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Yes. Under the very “just war” doctrine you allude to.

  124. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don't want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    Replies: @lysias, @Jack D, @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke

    That didn’t happen. They’re just trying to deflect blame. The calls didn’t even
    start until after it all fell apart.

  125. @Kronos
    @European-American


    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…
     
    It’s one of those things when some people see only chaos while others see secretive control. I still can’t make up my mind on which. Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole) but there is a big electoral paradigm shift happening within both parties. The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    https://youtu.be/sJ8agbmQhGo

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Desiderius, @The Wild Geese Howard

    Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole)

    Both of whom are 96.

    That’s éminence très, très grise.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Reg Cæsar

    True, but they’ve had plenty of time and resources to build up long lasting institutional clout. Stuff like Kissinger’s “shuttle diplomacy” and co-construction of the petrodollar was decades ago but contemporary economics/politics are built on that ancient computer code.

    It’s likely they did their best to mitigate the worst tendencies of the baby boomers.

  126. @Reg Cæsar
    @Bard of Bumperstickers


    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.
     
    Better yet, via expulsion. Practice on Puerto Rico. Then start with Hawaii Hawai'i, which we stole, remember. Then, California, but keeping San Diego and the Shastas.

    Replies: @Anon, @Bard of Bumperstickers

    Sierra, not Shastas

  127. @Desiderius
    https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/michael-lind-on-populism-racism-and-restoring-democracy

    Lind thinks attacks on President Trump have grown out of proportion and that the élites he scorns are engaged in a “Brown Scare” of trying to make Americans feel endangered by white Trump voters. He calls the belief that Trump was signalling his approval for white nationalism after the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville a “conspiracy theory” and bemoans “asymmetrical multiculturalism,” under which the “appreciation of minority and immigrant traditions is often coupled with élite contempt for the ancestral traditions of white native and white immigrant subcultures.”
     
    This is direct (uncredited of course) from Moldbug and Adams.

    Replies: @fnn

    Way before Moldbug:
    https://reason.com/2013/05/13/a-brown-scare-at-the-irs/

    A Brown Scare is like a Red Scare, except its anxieties involve the right rather than the left; the historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term in his 1983 book The Old Christian Right.

    https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/9623

    The conference reminded me of an example of wartime suppression of civil liberties that deserves more attention from historians: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944. The case began when the attorney general, after much pestering by FDR, decided to stage a show trial of about thirty assorted critics of the war. The defendants were a mixture of serious minded-isolationists and crackpots. The Department of Jusice used the The Smith Act to accuse them of promoting insubordination in the armed forces. The DOJ’s case was ludicrous and the trial gradually collapsed into chaos and farce.

    In his important, book, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War, historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term”Brown scare” to characterize how FDR and his allies used these tactics to suppress dissent by smearing right wing critics as disloyal.

    Many on the left, of course, suffered the same fate several years later under the hammer of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, Joe McCarthy’s Senate committee, and the same Smith Act that had provided the basis for the Sedition Trial. In 1944, however, the Communist party and many New Deal liberals strongly applauded the trial and other witch hunts of the Brown Scare and called for even tougher action.

    • Replies: @anon
    @fnn

    Way before Moldbug:

    Fewer than 20,000 words, too. Pity Jules Verne isn't alive today.

    , @Desiderius
    @fnn

    Five months.

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2013/09/technology-communism-and-brown-scare/

    Nice catch tho, may well have been where Moldbug got it.

    As for Moldbug's prolixity, you've got to remember his target audience. Overcredentialed progtards take to pretentious bloviation like moth to flame. Brevity is wasted on the witless as well as the unwitting.

  128. @Hypnotoad666
    @Kronos


    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.
     
    Yes. From the 1944 movie "Gaslight" with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman. I never saw the movie myself but the plot involves a husband trying to make his wife think she is insane for some nefarious reason. When I was a kid I heard the term as an old-timey expression by people in my parents' generation.

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left. It's sort of like the ubiquitous inaudible "dog whistles" that they claim are being sent by republicans as secret signals to the Russians, White Supremacists, and whatnot. The Left needs these cliches to help explain why reality is actually totally different from what you observe with your own lying eyes.

    https://youtu.be/0ToLfQU2xmg

    Replies: @Ozymandias, @anon

    The term had persisted in the psychology community the entire time.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Ozymandias

    Do they have any other favorite trigger words?

  129. @Dennis Dale
    @R.G. Camara

    Bernie's "bros" should riot if he takes this one lying down like last time.

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius

  130. @Kronos
    @European-American


    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…
     
    It’s one of those things when some people see only chaos while others see secretive control. I still can’t make up my mind on which. Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole) but there is a big electoral paradigm shift happening within both parties. The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    https://youtu.be/sJ8agbmQhGo

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Desiderius, @The Wild Geese Howard

    Both (chaos and secretive control) works.

    Checks and balances.

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Desiderius

    I’m an idiot, chaos or conspiracy sounds a LOT better than “chaos or secretive control.”

    I’m an “Elements of Style” man who strongly believes in simple straightforward sentences with minimal prose but that really bothered me earlier today. The latter just sounds cleaner.


    https://www.amazon.com/Elements-Style-William-Strunk-Jr/dp/194564401X

  131. @European-American
    Contrarian take: let's celebrate amateurism? Only in the US is there such a messy, baroque, uncertain process. It's a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system. But otherwise the chaos of primaries with dozens of silly-looking candidates earnestly debating, with an uncertain outcome and complicated and buggy and local process, produces interesting results, and gave us an unexpected result like Trump.

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background... Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome...

    PS: I loved how the NYT was predicting an 80% chance of Buttigieg winning with 71% of ballots counted, but now it has a 60% chance that Bernie wins. Or something... O Fake News! And statistics...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Kronos, @J.Ross, @moshe

    Controlling the CIA, the FBI, the Pentagon and the State Department (and giving adhered-to instructions to the MSM) at their most chaotic (and in the case of the media, ignored) pretty much is “everything.”

  132. anon[391] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hypnotoad666
    @Kronos


    I never heard the term “gaslight” until three years ago. Apparently, it originated from a old black-and-white film.
     
    Yes. From the 1944 movie "Gaslight" with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman. I never saw the movie myself but the plot involves a husband trying to make his wife think she is insane for some nefarious reason. When I was a kid I heard the term as an old-timey expression by people in my parents' generation.

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left. It's sort of like the ubiquitous inaudible "dog whistles" that they claim are being sent by republicans as secret signals to the Russians, White Supremacists, and whatnot. The Left needs these cliches to help explain why reality is actually totally different from what you observe with your own lying eyes.

    https://youtu.be/0ToLfQU2xmg

    Replies: @Ozymandias, @anon

    For some reason it took off again a few years ago, mainly on the political left.

    Feminists have been accusing “the patriarchy” of gaslighting for a few years. Personally, I know that any time a woman fumes about “gaslighting” it is obviously projection on her part. Lefties are essentially like women in their “emotions today, emotions tomorrow, emotions forever!” mindset so no surprise that it caught on.

    The obvious irony: constantly rewriting history as the Zinn-left does, is textbook gaslighting.

  133. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don't want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    Replies: @lysias, @Jack D, @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke

    Jonathan, why do you believe “reports”?

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @J.Ross


    Jonathan, why do you believe “reports”?
     
    The only sources we have for almost any information are reports and personal observation. Even experts who have all the information at their fingertips may still disagree in their conclusions.

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    (To me it seems that if you order your subordinates to do something that is illegal or wrong, then that looks like abuse of power, but it would be hard to convict God, or someone in a position similar to God, of abuse of power if yo dislike some of His acts, since he created the universe and is Omnipotent.)

    Popper held that it is the least likely, or most easily falsifiable, or simplest theory (attributes which he identified as all the same thing) that explains known facts that one should rationally prefer. His opposition to positivism, which held that it is the theory most likely to be true that one should prefer, here becomes very apparent. It is impossible, Popper argues, to ensure a theory to be true; it is more important that its falsity can be detected as easily as possible.

    So here is a report that certain things happened. It may or may not be true, but it should be possible for law enforcement to conduct an investigation to determine if there could be some truth in it and whether crimes were committed.

    https://us.cnn.com/2020/02/06/politics/iowa-caucus-prank-callers-chaos/index.html

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Art Deco

  134. The Democrats should go back to letting the smoke-filled room pick their candidates. It’s more honest and it got guys like Andrew Jackson into office.

  135. @J.Ross
    The official lie is now that Russian hackers and alt-right incels at 4chan are to blame for Iowa, and the CIA and Clintonite vote-tallying contractor calling itself SHADOW is nothing-to-see-here. Granting this preposterous notion we are left in about the same place: I guess absolutely nothing has been done by the selfless heroes who would defend us from the hordes of the steppe.
    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1225470505500774401

    Replies: @Bugg

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls. Nobody expected guys aping the Jerky Boys to ruin your Iowa caucus.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Bugg

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls

    "Hello, Iowa Democratic Headquarters"

    "Heh huh hehehehhhuh- is Joe Biden still running?"

    "Yes, yes he is"

    "Hahehhdhhh hhh uhhhhh.. is Pete Bootygig still running?"

    "Yes, Mayor Pete is still running"

    "HeHHAHAhhhe.......uhhhhh...is your refrigerator still running?"

    , @Pericles
    @Bugg

    "That's our story and we're sticking to it."

  136. @Reg Cæsar
    @Kronos


    Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole)
     
    Both of whom are 96.

    That's éminence très, très grise.

    Replies: @Kronos

    True, but they’ve had plenty of time and resources to build up long lasting institutional clout. Stuff like Kissinger’s “shuttle diplomacy” and co-construction of the petrodollar was decades ago but contemporary economics/politics are built on that ancient computer code.

    It’s likely they did their best to mitigate the worst tendencies of the baby boomers.

  137. @fnn
    @Desiderius

    Way before Moldbug:
    https://reason.com/2013/05/13/a-brown-scare-at-the-irs/


    A Brown Scare is like a Red Scare, except its anxieties involve the right rather than the left; the historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term in his 1983 book The Old Christian Right.
     
    https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/9623

    The conference reminded me of an example of wartime suppression of civil liberties that deserves more attention from historians: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944. The case began when the attorney general, after much pestering by FDR, decided to stage a show trial of about thirty assorted critics of the war. The defendants were a mixture of serious minded-isolationists and crackpots. The Department of Jusice used the The Smith Act to accuse them of promoting insubordination in the armed forces. The DOJ's case was ludicrous and the trial gradually collapsed into chaos and farce.

    In his important, book, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War, historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term"Brown scare" to characterize how FDR and his allies used these tactics to suppress dissent by smearing right wing critics as disloyal.

    Many on the left, of course, suffered the same fate several years later under the hammer of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, Joe McCarthy's Senate committee, and the same Smith Act that had provided the basis for the Sedition Trial. In 1944, however, the Communist party and many New Deal liberals strongly applauded the trial and other witch hunts of the Brown Scare and called for even tougher action.
     

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius

    Way before Moldbug:

    Fewer than 20,000 words, too. Pity Jules Verne isn’t alive today.

  138. @J.Ross
    @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan, why do you believe "reports"?

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan, why do you believe “reports”?

    The only sources we have for almost any information are reports and personal observation. Even experts who have all the information at their fingertips may still disagree in their conclusions.

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    (To me it seems that if you order your subordinates to do something that is illegal or wrong, then that looks like abuse of power, but it would be hard to convict God, or someone in a position similar to God, of abuse of power if yo dislike some of His acts, since he created the universe and is Omnipotent.)

    Popper held that it is the least likely, or most easily falsifiable, or simplest theory (attributes which he identified as all the same thing) that explains known facts that one should rationally prefer. His opposition to positivism, which held that it is the theory most likely to be true that one should prefer, here becomes very apparent. It is impossible, Popper argues, to ensure a theory to be true; it is more important that its falsity can be detected as easily as possible.

    So here is a report that certain things happened. It may or may not be true, but it should be possible for law enforcement to conduct an investigation to determine if there could be some truth in it and whether crimes were committed.

    https://us.cnn.com/2020/02/06/politics/iowa-caucus-prank-callers-chaos/index.html

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jonathan Mason

    But these reporters can have various levels of credibility, and we can logically analyze the reports themselves. Assuming the Russian hacker known as "4chan" really did temporarily overwhelm a phone bank, is that particularly significant given the other things happening? And as far as Romney's sincerity, you must be joking, you cannot believe this.

    , @Art Deco
    @Jonathan Mason

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    He didn't. The notion that Trump merited impeachment is a mix of attitudinizing and motivated reasoning. The latter isn't sustainable unless you live in deep blue bubbles, and Romney does not.

    Romney is a centimillionaire with a wife, five children, and twenty grandchildren. Of all that he could be doing in his old age, he elected to carpetbag into Utah (a state in which he's spent perhaps five of his 72 years on Earth) and run for a seat in our godawful federal legislature (which is a step down from the last elected office he held). What he's doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump. I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Jonathan Mason

  139. @Desiderius
    @Kronos

    Both (chaos and secretive control) works.

    Checks and balances.

    Replies: @Kronos

    I’m an idiot, chaos or conspiracy sounds a LOT better than “chaos or secretive control.”

    I’m an “Elements of Style” man who strongly believes in simple straightforward sentences with minimal prose but that really bothered me earlier today. The latter just sounds cleaner.

    • Agree: Desiderius
  140. @Desiderius
    @anon

    Use. Fucking. Paper.

    What value are you clowns exactly adding here?

    Replies: @Hibernian

    The whole business of hanging chads, apps that fail, etc., could be largely avoided by going back to voting machines (strictly mechanical.) It’d be slower than electronics, but faster than paaper ballots.

  141. @Ozymandias
    @Hypnotoad666

    The term had persisted in the psychology community the entire time.

    Replies: @Kronos

    Do they have any other favorite trigger words?

  142. @anon
    Lots of people will look at this and see doddering incompetents, and it's true that 75 year old precinct chairs might not be too sharp about their phone apps after their normal bedtime. But what is really going on is different groups of D operatives trimming and shaving the caucus vote for their guy.

    bomag

    Democrats have well-trained cadres that swoop in and re-count votes until enough are found to put their side on top.
     
    Can confirm. Multiple 2018 elections in my flyover state went down exactly that way. "Last minute provisional ballots from the rural precincts", etc. Right down to the county and city level.

    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Mr McKenna, @Reg Cæsar, @Justvisiting, @MBlanc46

    It’s a major reason why Trump is likely to “lose” regardless of how the voting goes. If the Dems in PA, OH, MI, and WI can’t steal sufficient votes to turn 2016 round, the likes if Richard J. Daley will be spinning in their graves.

  143. @Mr McKenna
    @anon



    The situation in Iowa is amusing, but it is a forecast of what to expect in November.
     
    It's finally election year. The mere fact that the Dems don't have a single compelling candidate, capable of readily dispatching Donald Trump, ought to give them pause. And I'm sure it would, if they were at all capable of reflection.

    Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Boethiuss, @MBlanc46

    Or if they didn’t know they had ways to win other than getting more votes.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @MBlanc46

    Sanders and Bloomberg are both compelling in their own ways, but so is Trump.

  144. @fnn
    @Desiderius

    Way before Moldbug:
    https://reason.com/2013/05/13/a-brown-scare-at-the-irs/


    A Brown Scare is like a Red Scare, except its anxieties involve the right rather than the left; the historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term in his 1983 book The Old Christian Right.
     
    https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/9623

    The conference reminded me of an example of wartime suppression of civil liberties that deserves more attention from historians: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944. The case began when the attorney general, after much pestering by FDR, decided to stage a show trial of about thirty assorted critics of the war. The defendants were a mixture of serious minded-isolationists and crackpots. The Department of Jusice used the The Smith Act to accuse them of promoting insubordination in the armed forces. The DOJ's case was ludicrous and the trial gradually collapsed into chaos and farce.

    In his important, book, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War, historian Leo Ribuffo coined the term"Brown scare" to characterize how FDR and his allies used these tactics to suppress dissent by smearing right wing critics as disloyal.

    Many on the left, of course, suffered the same fate several years later under the hammer of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, Joe McCarthy's Senate committee, and the same Smith Act that had provided the basis for the Sedition Trial. In 1944, however, the Communist party and many New Deal liberals strongly applauded the trial and other witch hunts of the Brown Scare and called for even tougher action.
     

    Replies: @anon, @Desiderius

    Five months.

    https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2013/09/technology-communism-and-brown-scare/

    Nice catch tho, may well have been where Moldbug got it.

    As for Moldbug’s prolixity, you’ve got to remember his target audience. Overcredentialed progtards take to pretentious bloviation like moth to flame. Brevity is wasted on the witless as well as the unwitting.

  145. @MBlanc46
    @Mr McKenna

    Or if they didn’t know they had ways to win other than getting more votes.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    Sanders and Bloomberg are both compelling in their own ways, but so is Trump.

  146. anon[391] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bugg
    @J.Ross

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls. Nobody expected guys aping the Jerky Boys to ruin your Iowa caucus.

    Replies: @anon, @Pericles

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls

    “Hello, Iowa Democratic Headquarters”

    “Heh huh hehehehhhuh- is Joe Biden still running?”

    “Yes, yes he is”

    “Hahehhdhhh hhh uhhhhh.. is Pete Bootygig still running?”

    “Yes, Mayor Pete is still running”

    “HeHHAHAhhhe…….uhhhhh…is your refrigerator still running?”

  147. @Kronos
    @European-American


    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background… Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome…
     
    It’s one of those things when some people see only chaos while others see secretive control. I still can’t make up my mind on which. Sure, you have some very ingrained institutional players in the background (Henry Kissinger, Bob Dole) but there is a big electoral paradigm shift happening within both parties. The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    https://youtu.be/sJ8agbmQhGo

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Desiderius, @The Wild Geese Howard

    The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.

    So, the takeaway is that I still have four years to get rich trading.

    Awesome!

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @The Wild Geese Howard

    Don’t forget the essentials!

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9n56_ytFRtM/UFuTbK9ZLkI/AAAAAAAAE-U/9cFNyGoKKFc/s1600/Gen+Y+Retirement.jpg

  148. Re: Gaslight

    Gaslight was a play written in 1938:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_Light

    The British made their own extremely well-regarded film version in 1940:

    Not really a big fan of the melodramatic acting style in those days. C’est la vie.

  149. @Kronos
    @Jack D

    Don’t they use corn for these kind of things?

    https://static.politico.com/41/85/9725bbfb49f9aa1baca01fbdc300/151103-iowa-voting-ap-1160.jpg

    Replies: @Ron Mexico

    I notice Trump’s jar is the only one filled to the neck of the jar. What is that image from?

    • Replies: @Kronos
    @Ron Mexico

    Here you go

    https://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/iowa-caucuses-republicans-2016-turnout-215496

  150. @Anonymous
    @Reg Cæsar

    Brazil has something like 30 different parties.

    Replies: @Dave3

    Argentina has 10 different political parties, all of which use the word “socialist” in their name or platform. So unless you stay home or your ballot is declared invalid, you’re voting for socialism!

  151. @The Wild Geese Howard
    @Kronos


    The 2024 Presidential election is going to be VERY nasty (I’m betting Trump wins in 2020.) But with most blood being spilled today in the primaries. That’s a marker of real change underway.
     
    So, the takeaway is that I still have four years to get rich trading.

    Awesome!

    Replies: @Kronos

    Don’t forget the essentials!

  152. @R.G. Camara
    Remember: Bernie refused to even talk about Hillary's email scandal in 2016 (dismissing it in a debate, to her applause) , and then refused to sue the DNC into bankruptcy/nonexistence when they rigged the game against them; instead, they bought him a house. Plus he's a weak, cowardly old pornographer and lifetime political parasite.

    And that's before we get to the fact that he subscribes to evil ideologies.

    If he were an honorable man, this would be outrageous. But he is dishonorable, and thus his getting screwed here by the Gay Version of Obama is a source of mirth for me.

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Polynikes, @The Wild Geese Howard, @Dennis Dale, @Pericles

    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

    Mayor Pete’s coming campaign slogan: “Yes Butt”

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Pericles

    https://twitter.com/CityBureaucrat/status/1225768531414913024?s=20

  153. @another anon
    Yeah, Florida 2000.

    The grand spectacle, when everyone watched with astonishment the counting of hanging chads.
    When 537 Florida men and women decided the fate of the world.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DG_WxVoXkAA_6_t.jpg

    It is nice when people still remember the good old times ;-)

    Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome

    Virgin Gore vs pregnant Chad

  154. @Jonathan Mason
    @J.Ross


    Jonathan, why do you believe “reports”?
     
    The only sources we have for almost any information are reports and personal observation. Even experts who have all the information at their fingertips may still disagree in their conclusions.

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    (To me it seems that if you order your subordinates to do something that is illegal or wrong, then that looks like abuse of power, but it would be hard to convict God, or someone in a position similar to God, of abuse of power if yo dislike some of His acts, since he created the universe and is Omnipotent.)

    Popper held that it is the least likely, or most easily falsifiable, or simplest theory (attributes which he identified as all the same thing) that explains known facts that one should rationally prefer. His opposition to positivism, which held that it is the theory most likely to be true that one should prefer, here becomes very apparent. It is impossible, Popper argues, to ensure a theory to be true; it is more important that its falsity can be detected as easily as possible.

    So here is a report that certain things happened. It may or may not be true, but it should be possible for law enforcement to conduct an investigation to determine if there could be some truth in it and whether crimes were committed.

    https://us.cnn.com/2020/02/06/politics/iowa-caucus-prank-callers-chaos/index.html

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Art Deco

    But these reporters can have various levels of credibility, and we can logically analyze the reports themselves. Assuming the Russian hacker known as “4chan” really did temporarily overwhelm a phone bank, is that particularly significant given the other things happening? And as far as Romney’s sincerity, you must be joking, you cannot believe this.

  155. @Bugg
    @J.Ross

    So after 4 years of meticulous planning, the Dem Iowa caucus was hacked by bunch of 13 year old boys making prank phone calls. Nobody expected guys aping the Jerky Boys to ruin your Iowa caucus.

    Replies: @anon, @Pericles

    “That’s our story and we’re sticking to it.”

  156. @Louis Renault
    @Anonymous

    How many mosques are there in Iowa? Did Louis Farrakhan have some people move in or are these more fine people from those superior countries we keep hearing about?

    Replies: @anon, @duncsbaby

    How many mosques are there in Iowa?

    One is too many and I’m sure there’s probably more than one. Hell even ND w/one third the pop. of Iowa has at least 2 that I know of.

    According to this list, there are 20 mosques/Islamic centers in Iowa:

    https://mosquelist.blogspot.com/2010/08/mosques-in-iowa-usa_10.html

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @duncsbaby


    Hell even ND w/one third the pop. of Iowa has at least 2 that I know of.
     
    Believe it or not, North Dakota had the very first in America. I don't know if it's still there, though.

    https://newrepublic.com/article/128726/north-dakota-prairie-became-home-americas-first-mosque

    Or maybe not. Cedar Rapids also makes a claim.

  157. @anon
    @Reg Cæsar

    This was a caucus. A bunch of veteran voters sitting in a classroom or fire station for three hours.*

    Did your caucus use an algorithm similar to Iowa? I don't understand what they are doing and how they are getting fractional results. There can't be a fraction of a vote, it's a discrete object - like a fraction of a person.

    I get that Iowa has a two stage process in their caucus, I think that to progress beyond the first round a candidate has to get 15% of the vote. Ok, so 100 people show up, 3 candidates get 20% each, two candidates get 15% each and one gets 10%. So Mr. / Ms. / ? 10% doesn't progress to the second round. Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.

    How can someone get 37.7% of anything? What am I missing?

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

    Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.

    First, this isn’t true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop. Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren’t a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    • Replies: @anon
    @ScarletNumber

    First, this isn’t true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop.

    Well, ok. Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?

    Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren’t a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    If there's 61 voters left, the whoever gets the majority of votes wins the precinct, right? Let's say there's 61 voters and 23 are for Candidate A, 10 are for candidate B and 28 for candidate C. Therefore Candidate C wins the precinct. Caucus over. No need for fractions.

    In my state we have primary elections by precinct. Majority of votes wins at both the state office and Federal level. I've seen 3 or 4 names on a state office, but only one goes forward to the general election. That's the purpose of primaries, to select a candidate from a particular party to stand for office. I'm assuming the same for these big committees called "caucuses": to select a candidate that the voters believe can win the election, whatever it may be.

    We don't report fractional votes in the general election: one person, one vote is the law, for good reason.

    What am I missing?

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

  158. @Desiderius
    @SFG

    https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1225309956511084546?s=20

    Yeah, Ross discovering this the (very) hard way this week. Even the moderates got sucked in.

    Replies: @EdwardM

    Except the Dems’ smear campaign against Kavanaugh probably would have worked: President Romney would have pulled the plug on him.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @EdwardM

    Yes, that's Mollie's point.

    Ross not getting that is destroying his career in real time. Hopefully some day he recovers.

    The most unifying aspect of Trump's presidency has been belatedly allowing R-leaning influencers to see the last twenty years of R leadership as the Ds have seen it. Ross's sincere embrace of Romney here leaves him the odd man out.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  159. @duncsbaby
    @Louis Renault

    How many mosques are there in Iowa?

    One is too many and I'm sure there's probably more than one. Hell even ND w/one third the pop. of Iowa has at least 2 that I know of.

    According to this list, there are 20 mosques/Islamic centers in Iowa:

    https://mosquelist.blogspot.com/2010/08/mosques-in-iowa-usa_10.html

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Hell even ND w/one third the pop. of Iowa has at least 2 that I know of.

    Believe it or not, North Dakota had the very first in America. I don’t know if it’s still there, though.

    https://newrepublic.com/article/128726/north-dakota-prairie-became-home-americas-first-mosque

    Or maybe not. Cedar Rapids also makes a claim.

  160. anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    Then repeat and see who comes in with the majority.
     
    First, this isn't true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop. Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren't a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    Replies: @anon

    First, this isn’t true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop.

    Well, ok. Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?

    Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren’t a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    If there’s 61 voters left, the whoever gets the majority of votes wins the precinct, right? Let’s say there’s 61 voters and 23 are for Candidate A, 10 are for candidate B and 28 for candidate C. Therefore Candidate C wins the precinct. Caucus over. No need for fractions.

    In my state we have primary elections by precinct. Majority of votes wins at both the state office and Federal level. I’ve seen 3 or 4 names on a state office, but only one goes forward to the general election. That’s the purpose of primaries, to select a candidate from a particular party to stand for office. I’m assuming the same for these big committees called “caucuses”: to select a candidate that the voters believe can win the election, whatever it may be.

    We don’t report fractional votes in the general election: one person, one vote is the law, for good reason.

    What am I missing?

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?
     
    No. In each particular precinct any candidate who gets 15% at the first gathering is guaranteed at least one delegate. Those who don't meet this threshold doesn't get any. The candidates who do meet the 15% threshold receive delegates in proportion to the amount of caucasers they have in the precinct. It is NOT winner take all.

    Replies: @anon

  161. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D

    Quite so. At the very simplest level they could just have each precinct enter its data into its assigned line on an Excel spreadsheet, e-mail it in, and then consolidate the spreadsheets onto a master spreadsheet that would calculate the totals, delegate counts, and so on. At a slightly more complex level there are numerous ways to further automate the process and cut down on manual data entry.

    You certainly don't want grannies trying to side load apps on iPhones. That is rank amateurism at the planning level.

    On the other hand, what is disturbing is reports that the phone lines were jammed by bad actors calling in on the vote count phone line who were deliberately interfering with the electoral process. I would think that fraudulently interfering in an political election would be a federal offense with very severe penalties. Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    Replies: @lysias, @Jack D, @J.Ross, @Johann Ricke

    Did anyone notice if these people had Russian or Ukrainian accents?

    This is like that time in the 90’s, when South African villains were de rigueur. Election problems? Lost an election? Blame shifty ex-Soviet states.

  162. Anon[188] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Mason
    @Bardon Kaldian


    An Iowa woman ... asked to change her vote when she learned the candidate is gay.

    She cited her religious beliefs for doing so.
     

    There always has to be one!

    So you vote for the best known political homosexual since the later Roman emperors, without knowing he is gay? And then you cite your religious beliefs as a reason for you to have a mulligan?

    Are you by any chance a Muslim? Where do the candidates stand on contraception? What about abortion? What about circumcision for boys vs girls? What is a just war? Where do you stand on leprosy or quarantine for corona virus victims? Should heretics be burned at the stake or just hanged?

    Is it possible for anyone with a religious conscience to vote at all in a secular election?

    Replies: @Russ, @Reg Cæsar, @Anon

    Maybe YOUR gay, did you ever think of that? And yes, most folks around here are God-fearing, God-respecting traditionally-minded people who think that sodomy is a heinous sin as explained in the Bible and every other major religious text. If that’s so TRIGGERING to you, maybe find another website for your gaslighting DNC-approved conspiracy theories? Here I’ll get you started…

    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Anon


    Maybe YOUR gay, did you ever think of that? And yes, most folks around here are God-fearing, God-respecting traditionally-minded people who think that sodomy is a heinous sin as explained in the Bible
     
    Well, I think the position of the various kinds of Christian religion is a bit more nuanced than that. The Bible does not really explain anything.

    It is true that a verse in Leviticus says:

    “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

    However, that is the Old Testament, and in Christianity the New Testament, which is rather more forgiving, rules. For example, Jesus stopped the stoning of a woman taken in adultery and pointed out that no one is really sin free.

    So few contemporary Christians actually advocate for a summary death penalty for gays, a position that is much more common in the Mohammedan world, so it is not really clear what the exact theological basis for the Iowa voter's volte face is all about.

    True, the Bible, when it does mention homosexuality is generally disparaging, as it is of sexual expression in general outside of marriage, but opposition to homosexuality is hardly a central theme in the Bible or in Christian theology in general.

    Homosexuality is not listed in the Ten Commandments and mentions of homosexuality in the Bible are usually in passing and grouped with a variety of other behaviors seen as undesirable, such as adultery.

    Is there any organization in the US that grades politicians with scores for adultery, so that God-fearing people like yourself can avoid the wrath of God by not voting for candidates who have broken one of the Ten Commandments?

  163. @Reg Cæsar
    @Bard of Bumperstickers


    No, all we need now is the Articles of Confederation and the ensuing dissolution of the US empire via secession.
     
    Better yet, via expulsion. Practice on Puerto Rico. Then start with Hawaii Hawai'i, which we stole, remember. Then, California, but keeping San Diego and the Shastas.

    Replies: @Anon, @Bard of Bumperstickers

  164. @George
    Buttigieg campaign paid firm that developed voting app blamed for Iowa caucus delays

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/buttigieg-campaign-paid-firm-that-developed-voting-app-blamed-for-iowa-caucus-delays

    But who names a company Shadow? That makes CIA conspiracy theories irresistible.

    The young'ns might enjoy SHADO, Supreme Headquarters Alien Defense Organization.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qDy4OMAkgY

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Thirdtwin, @Buck Ransom

    The Culinary Institute of America was really annoyed that they couldn’t turn
    Evan McMullin into a thing in 2016, so for 2020 they went all the way in with a gay Howdy-Doody lookalike named ButtPlug backed up by a vote-counting app that is jerry-rigged to tilt in his favor. The spooks are just trolling us now and having an absolute blast doing it.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Buck Ransom

    Ah yes, the OTHER CIA. Did you ever see the movie “Heavy”?

  165. @Hypnotoad666
    @anon

    The few California competitive House seats were the same in 2018. They were literally declaring Republican candidates the winner on election night when the voting was all done and they were up by 1-3 points.

    But a miraculous overnight surge of absentee votes showed up. Unlike all the other votes, these ran 100% Democrat and were just enough to change the result. This happened in about five crucial races. No f***ing way this was a coincidence.

    Replies: @Redneck farmer, @danand, @JR.Ewing.78, @Alfa158, @Moses

    I ran a polling station in San Francisco in the 2000s. There were pretty much zero accounting controls on the ballots, zero oversight, zero anything. Thousands of unmarked ballots were sitting in my apartment for weeks. I could have done anything with them.

    Not only that, anyone off the street could vote. They didn’t need to be on our list of names nor show any ID.

    I could have perpetrated crazy fraud. I can only imagine what an organized, experienced and motivated group could do if they ran all the stations in a city.

  166. moshe says:
    @European-American
    Contrarian take: let's celebrate amateurism? Only in the US is there such a messy, baroque, uncertain process. It's a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system. But otherwise the chaos of primaries with dozens of silly-looking candidates earnestly debating, with an uncertain outcome and complicated and buggy and local process, produces interesting results, and gave us an unexpected result like Trump.

    Yeah, yeah, sure, the Deep State is really controlling everything in the background... Is it, though? Sometimes I feel sorry for these apparently all-powerful puppet masters, they must have to work really hard and sort through a lot of strange bs to get their desired outcome...

    PS: I loved how the NYT was predicting an 80% chance of Buttigieg winning with 71% of ballots counted, but now it has a 60% chance that Bernie wins. Or something... O Fake News! And statistics...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Kronos, @J.Ross, @moshe

    Hey! I like your optimisim!

    I know this is hardly the place for it but between you and me let me thought-experiment the even more optimistic view that it’s pretty good that our system isn’t overly democratic and allows TPTB certain vetos and whatnot.

    I mean life is pretty good these days.

    The world has been around and humans have been playing on it for a long time and we’re more or less living in the best of times and in one of the most secure countries during this pretty cool time.

    Parliamentary systems are more democratic but as Trump told Bibi during their press conference together “you guys need to fix that”. (Or something like that. It was classic Trump chutzpah. It was awesome.)

    I don’t implicitly trust the shadowy DC Lifers and Lobbyists and whomever else has massive undemocratic powers but I can’t complain about the results with too much confidence. Who knows what a more democratic system would wring? In theory I can imagine all kinds if awesomenesses: A more selective immigration program, a system that didn’t allow us to have hundreds of black no-go zones, universal very basic income, complete freedom of speech, a more humane prison system, no coordinated extralegal pushes for gaydom or whatever, etc.

    But who knows if that’s what we’d get?

    The Germans are a pretty intelligent people and they democraticked themselves a literal (well, The Literal) Nazi government.

    So, I’m pretty cheery about how things are going. Sure, lots of things could and should be better but a WHOLE lot of things could be way way way worse.

    So, hey, fellas running the world, a few things you’ve done peeve me but overall, 5 Stars. Thanks guys!!

    • Thanks: European-American
  167. @Reg Cæsar
    @European-American


    It’s a bit too bad there still seems to be the iron rule of a two-party system.
     
    Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries. Where you see multi-party ballots are in small, more homogeneous places like Denmark.

    Even in the one state with third-party-friendly laws, New York, it's rare to see one win. Has it happened since James Buckley 50 years ago?

    And he had great "help" from Roger Goodell's father!

    Replies: @Anonymous, @European-American

    > Two-party systems are the rule in big, diverse countries

    Germany, France, and Italy beg to differ…

    In Germany, Die Linke, AFD, and the FDP are an important factor beyond CDU and SPD.

    In France, the two-party system exploded: RN, LREM, FI are all bigger than the Socialists and the Right coalition that had been top dogs. LREM is in power.

    In Italy, well, I don’t claim to understand, but there’s a lot of parties, and a fairly new party called Five Star is still in power.

    Even in the UK, UKIP and the Liberal Party have played a significant role.

    Historically, the US is exceptional in the general stability of its political system and in the way power is shared by two parties.

    And of course there’s a balance: stability at one level allows chaos at another level.

  168. @Jonathan Mason
    @J.Ross


    Jonathan, why do you believe “reports”?
     
    The only sources we have for almost any information are reports and personal observation. Even experts who have all the information at their fingertips may still disagree in their conclusions.

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    (To me it seems that if you order your subordinates to do something that is illegal or wrong, then that looks like abuse of power, but it would be hard to convict God, or someone in a position similar to God, of abuse of power if yo dislike some of His acts, since he created the universe and is Omnipotent.)

    Popper held that it is the least likely, or most easily falsifiable, or simplest theory (attributes which he identified as all the same thing) that explains known facts that one should rationally prefer. His opposition to positivism, which held that it is the theory most likely to be true that one should prefer, here becomes very apparent. It is impossible, Popper argues, to ensure a theory to be true; it is more important that its falsity can be detected as easily as possible.

    So here is a report that certain things happened. It may or may not be true, but it should be possible for law enforcement to conduct an investigation to determine if there could be some truth in it and whether crimes were committed.

    https://us.cnn.com/2020/02/06/politics/iowa-caucus-prank-callers-chaos/index.html

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Art Deco

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    He didn’t. The notion that Trump merited impeachment is a mix of attitudinizing and motivated reasoning. The latter isn’t sustainable unless you live in deep blue bubbles, and Romney does not.

    Romney is a centimillionaire with a wife, five children, and twenty grandchildren. Of all that he could be doing in his old age, he elected to carpetbag into Utah (a state in which he’s spent perhaps five of his 72 years on Earth) and run for a seat in our godawful federal legislature (which is a step down from the last elected office he held). What he’s doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump. I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.

    • Replies: @Paleo Liberal
    @Art Deco


    I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.
     
    I assume you are familiar with the concept of cognitive dissonance?

    Mitt Romney made his fortune in effect looting the great American infrastructure. His company would, say, buy a company that was hurting because they were making a slim profit or even a loss from manufacturing in the US. Romney and his gang would buy the company, close the factory, and have Chinese make the products for them.

    The entire Bush family made their fortune in ways Hunter Biden can only imagine. Such as, Neil Bush and his friends looted about $1 billion from Silverado in the 1980s, when $1 billion was a lot of money. The taxpayers footed the bill for that. George II had a failed company called Arbusto, which he sold to the bin Laden family for an outrageous amount of money. Then, he got in on a scheme with the Texas Rangers to fleece the Texas taxpayers.

    But, the Romney and Bush families are well mannered people.

    Trump, OTOH, was always a bit ill-mannered and cocky. While the Bushes and Romneys were in bed with the Saudis and Chinese, Trump was in bed with La Cosa Nostra and various personally hired thugs. While the Bush family would conduct their extra marital affairs discretely and with "classy" women, Trump is thrice married and banged porn stars. While the Bush and Romney families would write laws to create loopholes to legalize their schemes, Trump just bulldozes his way through, the law be damned.

    And so the Bush and Romney families can think they are so much better than that gauche fellow with the golden toilets and churlish tweets.

    I am by no means a fan of Trump. However, when my fellow left wingers start moaning about Trump being the "worst president ever", I always ask if Trump was the fellow who started two endless wars and crashed the economy twice, after using his brother to cheat(*) in Florida to get into office in the first place.



    (*) Again, JEB! found ways to make his cheating completely legal, such as using bad software that threw tens of thousands of black voters off the rolls by "accident". Which makes it so much more refined and genteel.
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Art Deco


    What he’s doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump.
     
    Unlikely motive, since even with Romney, the vote to impeach Trump was not even close to successful, even though many Republican senators knew perfectly well that Trump deserved censure at the very least for illegally ordering his subordinates to interfere with the disbursement of money for military aid to an ally that had been approved by congress, including the senate.

    Actually Romney did the Senate a massive favor by showing that it is possible for senators to vote independently of their party whip. He may also have been reflecting the opinion of his constituents, most of whom are Mormons and probably not particularly pro-Trump.

    Replies: @Desiderius

  169. @Ron Mexico
    @Kronos

    I notice Trump's jar is the only one filled to the neck of the jar. What is that image from?

    Replies: @Kronos

  170. @Art Deco
    @Jonathan Mason

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    He didn't. The notion that Trump merited impeachment is a mix of attitudinizing and motivated reasoning. The latter isn't sustainable unless you live in deep blue bubbles, and Romney does not.

    Romney is a centimillionaire with a wife, five children, and twenty grandchildren. Of all that he could be doing in his old age, he elected to carpetbag into Utah (a state in which he's spent perhaps five of his 72 years on Earth) and run for a seat in our godawful federal legislature (which is a step down from the last elected office he held). What he's doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump. I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Jonathan Mason

    I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.

    I assume you are familiar with the concept of cognitive dissonance?

    Mitt Romney made his fortune in effect looting the great American infrastructure. His company would, say, buy a company that was hurting because they were making a slim profit or even a loss from manufacturing in the US. Romney and his gang would buy the company, close the factory, and have Chinese make the products for them.

    The entire Bush family made their fortune in ways Hunter Biden can only imagine. Such as, Neil Bush and his friends looted about $1 billion from Silverado in the 1980s, when $1 billion was a lot of money. The taxpayers footed the bill for that. George II had a failed company called Arbusto, which he sold to the bin Laden family for an outrageous amount of money. Then, he got in on a scheme with the Texas Rangers to fleece the Texas taxpayers.

    But, the Romney and Bush families are well mannered people.

    Trump, OTOH, was always a bit ill-mannered and cocky. While the Bushes and Romneys were in bed with the Saudis and Chinese, Trump was in bed with La Cosa Nostra and various personally hired thugs. While the Bush family would conduct their extra marital affairs discretely and with “classy” women, Trump is thrice married and banged porn stars. While the Bush and Romney families would write laws to create loopholes to legalize their schemes, Trump just bulldozes his way through, the law be damned.

    And so the Bush and Romney families can think they are so much better than that gauche fellow with the golden toilets and churlish tweets.

    I am by no means a fan of Trump. However, when my fellow left wingers start moaning about Trump being the “worst president ever”, I always ask if Trump was the fellow who started two endless wars and crashed the economy twice, after using his brother to cheat(*) in Florida to get into office in the first place.

    (*) Again, JEB! found ways to make his cheating completely legal, such as using bad software that threw tens of thousands of black voters off the rolls by “accident”. Which makes it so much more refined and genteel.

  171. @Anon
    @Jonathan Mason

    Maybe YOUR gay, did you ever think of that? And yes, most folks around here are God-fearing, God-respecting traditionally-minded people who think that sodomy is a heinous sin as explained in the Bible and every other major religious text. If that's so TRIGGERING to you, maybe find another website for your gaslighting DNC-approved conspiracy theories? Here I'll get you started...

    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    Maybe YOUR gay, did you ever think of that? And yes, most folks around here are God-fearing, God-respecting traditionally-minded people who think that sodomy is a heinous sin as explained in the Bible

    Well, I think the position of the various kinds of Christian religion is a bit more nuanced than that. The Bible does not really explain anything.

    It is true that a verse in Leviticus says:

    “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

    However, that is the Old Testament, and in Christianity the New Testament, which is rather more forgiving, rules. For example, Jesus stopped the stoning of a woman taken in adultery and pointed out that no one is really sin free.

    So few contemporary Christians actually advocate for a summary death penalty for gays, a position that is much more common in the Mohammedan world, so it is not really clear what the exact theological basis for the Iowa voter’s volte face is all about.

    True, the Bible, when it does mention homosexuality is generally disparaging, as it is of sexual expression in general outside of marriage, but opposition to homosexuality is hardly a central theme in the Bible or in Christian theology in general.

    Homosexuality is not listed in the Ten Commandments and mentions of homosexuality in the Bible are usually in passing and grouped with a variety of other behaviors seen as undesirable, such as adultery.

    Is there any organization in the US that grades politicians with scores for adultery, so that God-fearing people like yourself can avoid the wrath of God by not voting for candidates who have broken one of the Ten Commandments?

    • LOL: Desiderius
  172. @Art Deco
    @Jonathan Mason

    Romney apparently believed that the house managers had proved their case against Donald Trump and that abuse of power was an impeachable offense under the constitution. Many other senators did not believe one or the other.

    He didn't. The notion that Trump merited impeachment is a mix of attitudinizing and motivated reasoning. The latter isn't sustainable unless you live in deep blue bubbles, and Romney does not.

    Romney is a centimillionaire with a wife, five children, and twenty grandchildren. Of all that he could be doing in his old age, he elected to carpetbag into Utah (a state in which he's spent perhaps five of his 72 years on Earth) and run for a seat in our godawful federal legislature (which is a step down from the last elected office he held). What he's doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump. I can understand why the McCains loathe Trump and he asked for that loathing. The conduct of Romney and the Bushes merits no such tolerance.

    Replies: @Paleo Liberal, @Jonathan Mason

    What he’s doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump.

    Unlikely motive, since even with Romney, the vote to impeach Trump was not even close to successful, even though many Republican senators knew perfectly well that Trump deserved censure at the very least for illegally ordering his subordinates to interfere with the disbursement of money for military aid to an ally that had been approved by congress, including the senate.

    Actually Romney did the Senate a massive favor by showing that it is possible for senators to vote independently of their party whip. He may also have been reflecting the opinion of his constituents, most of whom are Mormons and probably not particularly pro-Trump.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Jonathan Mason


    illegally
     
    If it were illegal the articles would have alleged a crime. Attempting to steal these bases in broad daylight (and getting thrown out by a mile) says much more about yourself and those feeding you this nonsense than anyone you're attempting to indict. Likewise with Romney.
  173. @EdwardM
    @Desiderius

    Except the Dems' smear campaign against Kavanaugh probably would have worked: President Romney would have pulled the plug on him.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    Yes, that’s Mollie’s point.

    Ross not getting that is destroying his career in real time. Hopefully some day he recovers.

    The most unifying aspect of Trump’s presidency has been belatedly allowing R-leaning influencers to see the last twenty years of R leadership as the Ds have seen it. Ross’s sincere embrace of Romney here leaves him the odd man out.

    • Replies: @Desiderius
    @Desiderius

    Huge if true (it is).

    https://twitter.com/DouthatNYT/status/1225783209784377344?s=20

    Don't call it a comeback.

  174. @Jonathan Mason
    @Art Deco


    What he’s doing makes no sense if his purpose is anything but to harass Trump.
     
    Unlikely motive, since even with Romney, the vote to impeach Trump was not even close to successful, even though many Republican senators knew perfectly well that Trump deserved censure at the very least for illegally ordering his subordinates to interfere with the disbursement of money for military aid to an ally that had been approved by congress, including the senate.

    Actually Romney did the Senate a massive favor by showing that it is possible for senators to vote independently of their party whip. He may also have been reflecting the opinion of his constituents, most of whom are Mormons and probably not particularly pro-Trump.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    illegally

    If it were illegal the articles would have alleged a crime. Attempting to steal these bases in broad daylight (and getting thrown out by a mile) says much more about yourself and those feeding you this nonsense than anyone you’re attempting to indict. Likewise with Romney.

  175. @Pericles
    @R.G. Camara


    The new Deep State Front man is But-plug.

     

    Mayor Pete's coming campaign slogan: "Yes Butt"

    Replies: @Desiderius

  176. It is a complete and total outrage that baby boomer pop star Johnny Cougar Mellencamp has endorsed billionaire New York City Jew Mike Bloomberg for president.

    Mr Johnny Mellencamp, of a small town in the alleged, possibly non-existent state of Indiana, says that Jew billionaire Mike Bloomberg will be the best champion for small town America and small town American mores, folkways and small town values.

    Decent Jew Tonelson:

  177. @Desiderius
    @EdwardM

    Yes, that's Mollie's point.

    Ross not getting that is destroying his career in real time. Hopefully some day he recovers.

    The most unifying aspect of Trump's presidency has been belatedly allowing R-leaning influencers to see the last twenty years of R leadership as the Ds have seen it. Ross's sincere embrace of Romney here leaves him the odd man out.

    Replies: @Desiderius

    Huge if true (it is).

    Don’t call it a comeback.

  178. Have mercy, host:

    The juxtaposition of Pete Buttjudge and “hanging chads” is too much for me to bear with this head cold.

  179. @anon
    @ScarletNumber

    First, this isn’t true. Once everyone gets to at least 15% you stop.

    Well, ok. Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?

    Also, you can have fractional percents if there aren’t a tidy number of voters. For example, if you have 61 voters, and 23 of them vote for a particular candidate, that percentage is 37.7%.

    If there's 61 voters left, the whoever gets the majority of votes wins the precinct, right? Let's say there's 61 voters and 23 are for Candidate A, 10 are for candidate B and 28 for candidate C. Therefore Candidate C wins the precinct. Caucus over. No need for fractions.

    In my state we have primary elections by precinct. Majority of votes wins at both the state office and Federal level. I've seen 3 or 4 names on a state office, but only one goes forward to the general election. That's the purpose of primaries, to select a candidate from a particular party to stand for office. I'm assuming the same for these big committees called "caucuses": to select a candidate that the voters believe can win the election, whatever it may be.

    We don't report fractional votes in the general election: one person, one vote is the law, for good reason.

    What am I missing?

    Replies: @ScarletNumber

    Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?

    No. In each particular precinct any candidate who gets 15% at the first gathering is guaranteed at least one delegate. Those who don’t meet this threshold doesn’t get any. The candidates who do meet the 15% threshold receive delegates in proportion to the amount of caucasers they have in the precinct. It is NOT winner take all.

    • Replies: @anon
    @ScarletNumber

    The candidates who do meet the 15% threshold receive delegates in proportion to the amount of caucasers they have in the precinct. It is NOT winner take all.

    I did not think of proportionality in awarding delegates. That explains what I was missing.

    Thanks.

  180. @ScarletNumber
    @anon


    Someone has to have a majority, otherwise no clear winner has emerged, right?
     
    No. In each particular precinct any candidate who gets 15% at the first gathering is guaranteed at least one delegate. Those who don't meet this threshold doesn't get any. The candidates who do meet the 15% threshold receive delegates in proportion to the amount of caucasers they have in the precinct. It is NOT winner take all.

    Replies: @anon

    The candidates who do meet the 15% threshold receive delegates in proportion to the amount of caucasers they have in the precinct. It is NOT winner take all.

    I did not think of proportionality in awarding delegates. That explains what I was missing.

    Thanks.

  181. @Buck Ransom
    @George

    The Culinary Institute of America was really annoyed that they couldn't turn
    Evan McMullin into a thing in 2016, so for 2020 they went all the way in with a gay Howdy-Doody lookalike named ButtPlug backed up by a vote-counting app that is jerry-rigged to tilt in his favor. The spooks are just trolling us now and having an absolute blast doing it.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Ah yes, the OTHER CIA. Did you ever see the movie “Heavy”?

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS