The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
The Throne and the Altar
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_709900843

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Ron Unz did it again. He published a few pieces on the Jewish Question, and caused a veritable avalanche of comments and responses. His strong point is the personal touch. It is not a lecture on Jewish faith or Jewish contacts with the Nazis, but rather a story of Unz’s own Odyssey from commonly accepted truisms to a better understanding. Along the way, Unz breaks out of the box, and we share in his discovery of unknown or well-forgotten truths.

His language is moderate, he never screams, and such peaceful delivery makes the material easier to comprehend. He did not emerge a philosemite, for sure, he is not a man who believes that everything Jews do they do for the Glory of God. He goes quite far, but he does not go to the extreme in his judgements, and this is good thing.

In the prevailing climate of Adoration of the Jew, it is good that some brave and noble persons step forward to speak truth to power and to the masses. Without going too far in history, in the beginning of the present century there were more such stubborn and reckless guys. I wrote here on WHEN VICTIMS RULE: A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America, a huge internet project that regretfully disappeared from its usual place, and it hadn’t been updated for a decade at least, but it still can be found here, albeit under a Not Secure banner.

Ron Unz mentions his predecessors Professors Albert Lindemann of the University of California, Kevin MacDonald of California State University, Israel Shahak of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Elliot Horowitz, Israel Joseph Yuval of the Hebrew University and other researchers. These people of science doubted the eternal benevolence of the Jews for the Gentiles.

Unz bravely deals with the German anti-Jewish polemics of Mein Kampf, as well, and he made it available on his site. Though, if you are interested in Hitler’s thoughts on the subject, you can choose a much shorter (22 pages) and more lucid book, a discussion between Adolf Hitler and his teacher, early NSDAP ideologue Dietrich Eckart, Bolshevism From Moses to Lenin.

Unz did not get yet to the Leftist critique of Jewishness, and there are real pearls waiting for him, like Karl Marx’s On the Jewish Question, a brief (22 pages) and powerful treaty, and Abram Leon’s The Jewish Question. There is Left-Christian point of view by the wonderful Simone Weil, who famously refused to enter the Catholic Church considering it “too Jewified”, and whose Need for Roots combines Communism and rejection of mass migration.

There is a Right-Christian view of G K Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc. E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars is a contemporary bearer of the Catholic anti-Jewish tradition (His latest text had been annotated thus “Catholics and the Jew Taboo by E. Michael Jones. For more than 50 years, the Catholic Church has lost every battle in the culture wars. Sun Tzu said if you don’t know who you are and who your enemy is, you will lose every battle. The record of the Church has proven Sun Tzu right. It’s time for a different approach. It’s time to break the Jew Taboo.”)

Indeed there is no better tool against Jewish supremacy than the glorious name of Christ; but it will take time and effort for Americans to recognise that.

One of the best critical thinkers on the subject was the greatest historian of the 20th century, Arnold Toynbee. Any discussion of Jews and Nazis is incomplete without reference to his seminal Study of History, v.8 (can be read here). Toynbee explained why Jews want mass migration from the Third World to Europe: in a European country populated by Somali, Afghan, Syrian etc communities, the Jews will become normalcy itself. Toynbee considered Naqba, the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948, a terrible crime on a par with Nazi persecution of Jews. For his moral position, his name had been erased from the lists of recommended literature, he is not quoted anymore, and practically vanished, while ceding space to his third-grade Jewish contemporaries.

In short, there were Jews and Gentiles, leftists and rightists, who made a go at deconstructing the Jewish narrative and undermining Jewish influence. Today, there are fewer and fewer such voices; and that’s why God bless Ron Unz for picking up the torch. Hopefully he will persist where others dropped of fatigue. The Jews and Gentiles both need it, and especially in the US.

Jews and Bolsheviks

This is not to say that Unz is always right. The Russian Revolution had been allegedly perpetrated by Jewish money, and/or German money, but those claims remained in the realm of black PR. Jacob Schiff was in correspondence with Milyukov, a leading minister in Kerensky government, and an enemy of Bolsheviks in 1917. Claims that Lenin took money from German military had been disproven long time ago. Antony Sutton’s book presents the sum of these claims, and the Russians argued against it convincingly.

Moreover, there is nothing wrong about taking money from wealthy Jews. I did it. Everybody does it. Wealthy Jews give money to all parties that have some chance of success; like now in the US, they support the Reps and Dems, for Trump and against Trump.

ORDER IT NOW

Lenin’s attitude was simple and straightforward: take money from whoever gives, do only what you should. Lenin wouldn’t hesitate to take money from Schiff, or Rothschild, or from the Elders of Zion. He believed the capitalists will sell Bolsheviks the rope they will be hanged on. But people who tried to collect what they considered a debt of influence were promptly shot after Bolsheviks’ victory. Jews were involved on all sides in the Russian Revolution: for Lenin and against Lenin, but apparently majority of Russian Jews supported the Mensheviks, the moderate Social Democrats, who lost in 1918 to Lenin’s Bolsheviks. Bolsheviks succeeded to de-Jewify even Russian Jews: they were quickly assimilated, their language Yiddish vanished, their synagogues were decimated; they intermarried, took Russian names, many of them joined the Russian church.

Do not overestimate importance of money. Clinton had much more money than Trump, yet she lost. Bolsheviks had much less money than their enemies, yet they won. Their victory was due to Lenin’s genius, to clear and coherent agenda, to their iron will and readiness to act, and the last but not least: due to popular support by the Russia’s Deplorables.

The Jews moved from their hamlets to Moscow and Petersburg after the Revolution, and they were very visible, like Latinos in New York in 1970s, or like the Blacks after the Civil War. However, they couldn’t and didn’t take over the Russian state. The anti-Communists (“the Whites”)who had lost in the ensuing struggle blamed their defeat on Jewish intervention – like Dems blame their defeat on Putin’s Russia. In reality, they had to blame themselves.

Jewish Church

The Jews aren’t only about money. For many generations, clever Jewish kids were trained to be lawyers, theologians, priests, while second-best went for business. (The nearest comparison is provided by Brahmins of India.) And for many generations, their abilities were of little use beside arguing in the synagogue. Only in 19th century, when the Jews joined gentile society en masse, they could practice these well-honed skills on the large scale. They began to build a theocratic society, the only one they were trained to build. In this theocracy, they were supposed to be lawgivers, judges, preachers; and thus Jews took positions in the legal profession and in media, judging and preaching.

Jewish success means they succeeded to build this society, where they form the Church and the Law. On the way, they had to break the “old” Christian church, and they had to establish the supreme position of the Law, undermining the political structure of executive and legislative powers.

Perhaps the first struggle of Jews for superiority was the fight against tobacco companies. They could not pass laws against them, but they could ruin them by accepting frivolous suits against them. When the US Courts began to rule against tobacco companies to the extent of many billions of dollars, the companies surrendered. Like the abortion law, tobacco law had been given by judges, not by Congress or the President administration. It could not be done without the active support of media: the gentlemen of the press convinced the public that tobacco is bad, and that the courts act in the public interest. Since then, the Jewish church, that is media, and the Jewish courts (Jews have almost-majority in the Supreme Court and in the media) together rule the US, just like the Jews did in the Biblical times.

This arrangement is profoundly anti-democratic, and it could not but cause great dissatisfaction. This explains the nature of the current fight between President Trump and the US media and law establishment. If for a moment we overlook the Jewish aspect of the media and law, it is a struggle between the Power and the voice of critical public. This is how the media gentlemen would prefer us to see it, for a person of a free mind will side with critics of Power.

But if we take into account the Jewish aspect, we shall get a totally different picture. Trump is a spiritual heir to Henry the VIII and other great kings who had fought the Church. The Western Jewish and Jewified media is a modern Church that displaced and replaced the Christian Church in the West. And in the struggle between the Throne and the Church, a free person will rather choose the Throne.

Regarding freedom, the Jews had made a U-turn. Traditionally, the Jews allied themselves to the Kings, against the Church and against the Commons. They were enemies of the Church, and as they exploited the common folk, they needed royal protection. As they were enemies of the Church, they were considered allies to men of free spirit, who struggled to free themselves and the society from the church shackles. Films and books (notably by Umberto Eco) present Jews as the best friends of first European free-thinkers opposing the Inquisition.

The Jews did not love freedom for freedom’s sake. They wanted to become the dominant Church themselves, and to rule the spirit of the world. They made it in the US, the only country without a church of its own. The US has, instead, a lot of churches, but it has not one single church to unite the citizenry in one communion. In the competition against these splinters, the Jewish Church did win its dominant position in the society.

After achieving this historic victory, the Jews rolled the world back to pre-Christian times, to the rule of their church and their judges. The King had his power severely undermined, and democracy almost lost its meaning. Before, Jews were for freedom; now, the Jews are against it and for obedience to their rules.

The Supreme Court is the real highest authority of the United States, exactly as the Jews prefer – especially that there are three, or four Jews. Now President Trump wants to bring in a Catholic in place of a resigning Catholic, Justice Kennedy, and the Jews are upset. The old witch of California, Senator Dianne Feinstein attacked the Catholic Judge Amy Coney Barrett for her faith. They wanted another Jewish judge, and Obama nominated him; alas, the Republicans blocked his appointment, otherwise there would be Jewish majority, and they would be able to declare the US as another Jewish state by claiming that it is what the Constitution means. After they declared that the Constitution means a union of two men is marriage, or that every woman is entitled to murder her unborn child, or that the President is not allowed to stop illegal immigration, they can decide anything.

ORDER IT NOW

Trump does not dare to say he wants to get a non-Jew to the Court, so he speaks in terms of Liberal vs Conservative judges. Certainly it is important, but even more important to defang the Supreme Court, to force it to give up the authority it usurped.

The FRS is too independent, and also in Jewish hands. Shouldn’t Trump try to pry it away? And the Security Agencies: how many of them are being led by Jews?

Hate speech laws are a modern equivalent of medieval blasphemy laws. The Jews want to decide who can – and can’t govern. In the UK, three Jewish newspapers attacked Jeremy Corbyn, but other mainstream newspapers, ostensibly non-Jewish, also are sticking to the same tune. In the US, the Jews decided that Trump may not be president, that is unless he is doing everything Israeli Prime Minister asks for.

So indeed there is a great need to bring democracy to the US by restoring President’s constitutional powers and by severely curbing unconstitutional Jewish powers. And fine articles by Ron Unz could be a great start for this road to real American independence.

P.S. It hurts to defend a serial killer, especially for free, but the recent Monsanto case, where the rogue giant was ordered to pay up $290 million to a sick gardener, calls exactly for that. The law establishment wants to demonstrate its humaneness and responsiveness to our feelings. This is a way of good tyrants to endear themselves upon the people.

Monsanto deserves to be destroyed, but so is the tyranny of the legal establishment. The law gentlemen (and ladies) should be cut down to size, while the political decisions (and fighting Monsanto is a political decision) should be made by people and their elected politicians.

An American revolution should free people of law dictatorship; let courts decide in normal cases, normal damages, like it is done in Europe where courts never issue similar rulings, and you will be free. It is clearly absurd to decide millions to an old gardener, with all sympathy. The money will anyway be shared between lawyers, and he will get pennies.

 

Israel Shamir can be reached at [email protected]

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Jews 
Hide 252 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Brabantian says: • Website

    Regarding what Israel Shamir writes above, that

    The Supreme Court is the real highest authority of the United States, exactly as the Jews prefer

    This is only true in practice but not according to the (neglected and essentially dead) US Constitution, which makes the Congress quite ‘supreme’ over the judges

    According to that 1789 piece of paper, the US Congress has full unlimited authority to remove from office any and all federal national judges, including all those of the Supreme Court, for ‘lack of good behaviour’, i.e., for not honouring the Constitution, for making bad & ugly decisions, etc – No accusation of crime or misdeeds is needed at all

    This power by the US Congress, impeachment to take place in the US House of Representatives, trial in the US Senate, is quite unlimited and at the discretion of the Congress itself

    But that power is almost never exercised, with only a handful of US judges removed in this way in USA history … the US Congress in general submits to the oligarch game of making a fetish of ‘the law’ as something they pretend they cannot control whilst it serves oligarch interests

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Thank you.

    I’m no expert, but it seems this would, under a truly federal system that once had the Senate elected by state legislators, have been included as a further check on the national government’s arrogation of authority.

    Many here mock “Muh Constitution,” and they have a point. But your observation that many problems have been caused by its neglect, not its inherent flaws, is correct.
    , @Prester John
    It's not for nothing that the first of the seven articles in the US Constitution references the legislative branch--not the executive or judicial ("All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives"). The Founders knew what they were doing. They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a "democracy").

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    , @Respect
    Thomas Hobbes , 1588-1679 , an englisman , said that " Auctoritas non veritas facet legem " , or Authorithy , no truth , makes the law . And he agreed with that . He thought that the Authority of the State is above the truth , above everything . He also said that " The State of the rule of Law must control people authoritarily " .
    So he was a despot ,a tyrant , a liar , at the service of a totalitarian English State .

    Enmanuel Kant , 1724-1804 , a german , preached the Rechtstat , the State of the rule of Law , in which " the Law is above everything , and the State is above the Law " . He proposes that a legal administration , a legal normativism , must say whats is good and evil , He defends the absolute tiranny of the Law at the service of the Absolutist State .
    So he was also a tirant ,a despot , a liar , at the service of a totalitarian Prussian State ,

    So do not blame averything on the jews , western lawyers and politicians have created along the last 4 centuries a totalitarian monster , that puts himself above the truth , above logic, above reason , above the people , above reality , above common sense , above God .

    No wonder that a despotic and demented west is producing more and more rejection both in non western countries and in its own population .
    , @Florin
    I think Shamir ought to read more on the Jewishness of the Old Bolsheviks and their financing.

    it was a Jewish coup, just as in Germany a year later there was a failed Jewish, Bolshevik coup... even Wiki cant hide the Jewishness of most leaders of the Spartacan movement... All JudeoBolshevist violence several years before the Nazis came to power.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. However, they [Jews] couldn’t and didn’t take over the Russian state

    Others see it differently:

    ‘According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 566 important functionaries of the Bolshevik state in 1918-1919 there were 17 Russians … and 457 Jews.’—Appendix D to Robert Wilton’s The Last Days of the Romanovs

    ‘…the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish.’—President Putin, reported in The Times of Israel

    ‘[I M] Bikerman wrote with evident concern in 1923 that “the Jew is in all corners and on all levels of power. … The Russian sees him as a ruler of Moscow, at the head of the capital on Neva [Leningrad], and at the head of the Red Army, a perfected death machine. … The Russian sees the Jew as judge and hangman; he sees Jews at every turn, not only among the communists, but among people like himself, everywhere doing the bidding of Soviet power.”’—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Two Hundred Years Together, Chapter 18

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin's words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.
    , @anon
    Yes Mr. Israel Shamir, but why did these mass migrations take place?

    Track backward from the Jewish domination of previous Irish NY and the Russian Jewish Red October to Salonika, Ottoman Empire where the Ottoman hosted the Jewish traders and bankers, since Spanish, 1392 and Portuguese expulsion 1401) . I have been trying to track Portuguese and Spanish Jewish back to the 1250(?), British expulsion of the Jews) where did that come from, decendants of the same booted from Britain (1250?) group??...
    The attempt (CUP) to overthrow their Ottoman Host, failed, three million migrated by 1910 in either to NY, USA or to St. Petersburg, Russia? The coup attempt was a direct result of the 1896, Hertzl Zionist Congress Group, mostly German, French and British Bankers and Traders. Many of these migrants replaced the officers and administrators of the Russian Government (during the fighting days of the revolution, a neat way to make the coup successful, and were the Russian migrant half of the 3 million that sent letters to the USA president encouraging American intervention in WWI, Its all part of the bankersters and Jewish traders (corporations) and a global network that works like an octopus. The Story of the East Indies companies is illuminating ( a corporation became British and Indian government as far as India was concerned).

    This story has not yet been fully explained in my opinion. Some of this story is hazy, but I believe its there?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brabantian
    Regarding what Israel Shamir writes above, that

    The Supreme Court is the real highest authority of the United States, exactly as the Jews prefer
     
    This is only true in practice but not according to the (neglected and essentially dead) US Constitution, which makes the Congress quite 'supreme' over the judges

    According to that 1789 piece of paper, the US Congress has full unlimited authority to remove from office any and all federal national judges, including all those of the Supreme Court, for 'lack of good behaviour', i.e., for not honouring the Constitution, for making bad & ugly decisions, etc - No accusation of crime or misdeeds is needed at all

    This power by the US Congress, impeachment to take place in the US House of Representatives, trial in the US Senate, is quite unlimited and at the discretion of the Congress itself

    But that power is almost never exercised, with only a handful of US judges removed in this way in USA history ... the US Congress in general submits to the oligarch game of making a fetish of 'the law' as something they pretend they cannot control whilst it serves oligarch interests

    Thank you.

    I’m no expert, but it seems this would, under a truly federal system that once had the Senate elected by state legislators, have been included as a further check on the national government’s arrogation of authority.

    Many here mock “Muh Constitution,” and they have a point. But your observation that many problems have been caused by its neglect, not its inherent flaws, is correct.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. @Johnny Rottenborough
    However, they [Jews] couldn’t and didn’t take over the Russian state

    Others see it differently:

    ‘According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 566 important functionaries of the Bolshevik state in 1918-1919 there were 17 Russians … and 457 Jews.’—Appendix D to Robert Wilton’s The Last Days of the Romanovs

    ‘…the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish.’—President Putin, reported in The Times of Israel

    ‘[I M] Bikerman wrote with evident concern in 1923 that “the Jew is in all corners and on all levels of power. … The Russian sees him as a ruler of Moscow, at the head of the capital on Neva [Leningrad], and at the head of the Red Army, a perfected death machine. … The Russian sees the Jew as judge and hangman; he sees Jews at every turn, not only among the communists, but among people like himself, everywhere doing the bidding of Soviet power.”’—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Two Hundred Years Together, Chapter 18

    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin’s words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.

    Read More
    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
    • Replies: @Johnny Rottenborough
    Israel Shamir—A review by Kevin MacDonald of Yuri Slezkine’s book The Jewish Century contains a section entitled ‘Bolshevism As a Jewish Revolution’, beginning on p82 of this PDF.
    , @Jon Halpenny
    "By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power," As Ron Unz pointed, 3 out of 5 of the contenders for leadership of the USSR after Lenin's death were Jewish. If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom. As it happened, the Gentile Stalin took power. But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.
    , @CalDre
    Aside from what others have written on the evidence that Jews dominated the Bolsheviks (including half-Jew Lenin and rabid Jew Trotsky, who spent the years prior to the "Revolution" (Carnage) collecting money from Jewish bankers on Wall Street, the fact is Jews dominated the Bolsheviks and especially the genocidal anti-Christian terror squads.

    Stalin beat Trotsky to power by a historical coincidence, and purged a good number of Jews, leading to their reduction in the Bolshevik leadership as Shamir points out.

    But, he did not purge them all, and the most vicious and violent among his remaining servants were Jews. E.g., Lazar Kaganovich was responsible for the Holodomor, the grand theft of food from farmers which led to millions and millions of deaths (ironically, though it was the Jew Kaganovich and the Georgian Stalin who made the decisions, and it was carried out largely by Ukrainian nationals in Ukraine (the famine also decimated parts of Russia and other Soviet Republics, and even in Ukraine, it was most egregious in the more Russian Eastern oblasts), Ukrainians blame Russians for the crime - and we may note that Jews to this day control virtually all of the mass media in Ukraine, which is responsible for creating this impression and in general the vicious Russophobia in Ukraine).

    Kruschev purged even more of the maniacal Jews, including Lazar Kaganovich. Finally after all Jews were purged from Communism, it became a tolerable system. Gone was the Red Terror, mass murdering and gulags. (That is, until Jews once again seized power in Israel, now they do it to their Palestinian neighbors under the Jew supremacist banner of Zionism, though less "roughly", not out of morals, but out of politics, being too cruel (although they are already immensely cruel) to their Palestinian "subhumans" would not be "good for the Jews", given limits on their global power at this juncture.)

    Shamir is pushing fake history here.

    , @Veritas X-
    Mr I Shamir, you are wrong, "...and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.".
    According to the *JTA-Jewish Telegraphic Agency*:
    USSR leader Andropov reportedly hid Jewish roots to advance in party
    June 17, 1999 9:00am

    MOSCOW, June 17 (JTA) — Former Soviet leader Yuri Andropov had Jewish roots, according to recent reports in the Russian press. Andropov, who was in charge of the KGB for 15 years and then headed the USSR from November 1982 until his death in February 1984, concealed his Jewish background after he entered the Communist Party as a young man, according to the reports. Andropov’s mother, Yevgeniya Faynshtein, was a music teacher in southern Russia. The fate of Andropov’s father remains a mystery. His mother later remarried a Russian Greek named Andropulo. His adopted son later changed this last name to a more Russian-sounding one. Unlike many other Soviet leaders, Andropov never wrote his memoirs, which in part can be explained by his roots, say the reports. Andropov’s role in Soviet history is still open to a debate 15 years after his death. During the 1950s he served as Moscow’s ambassador to Hungary and arranged for Soviet tanks to enter Budapest to crush the Hungarian uprising of 1956. Between 1967 and 1982 while he served as head of the KGB, the Soviet secret service, he was responsible for persecuting dissidents, including members of the underground Jewish movement. Yet some credit him for exiling some of the prominent dissidents rather than jailing them — as well as for partially opening the doors for Jewish emigration to Israel in the 1970s. According to the daily newspaper Today, human rights activist Andrei Sakharov once remarked that under Andropov the KGB was the only institution in the USSR that was not corrupt. Some people speculate that had Andropov not died so soon, he would have launched reforms to pump life into the country’s stagnant economy — moves that were later made by Andropov protege Mikhail Gorbachev.
    https://www.jta.org/1999/06/17/news-opinion/ussr-leader-andropov-reportedly-hid-jewish-roots-to-advance-in-party

    Remember Mr I Shamir, Trust is Earned. Sorry. Never trusted you before and most certainly don't trust you now.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @Israel Shamir
    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin's words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.

    Israel Shamir—A review by Kevin MacDonald of Yuri Slezkine’s book The Jewish Century contains a section entitled ‘Bolshevism As a Jewish Revolution’, beginning on p82 of this PDF.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    A review by Kevin MacDonald
     
    Kevin MacDonald is NOT a "scholar" of Russian Revolution (there were THREE of them between 1905 and October 1917) because he is not a scholar of Russian peasantry and warfare. US historiography is remarkably sterile whenever the only issue which matters--war and a conflict--comes up, since overwhelming majority of these scholars have no clue on the nature and application of military power. They also have no grasp of scale of the 20th century warfare and conflict in general. Israel Shamir is spot on when states that Jews were out of power in USSR by 1930s. They were flushed out, together with Civil War leftover nutjobbery. Jews are a popular and necessary topic to discuss but general Western ignorance on Russian peasantry would be comical, if not for it being so damaging to the, otherwise pathetically inadequate American "Russian Studies" field. Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. @Johnny Rottenborough
    Israel Shamir—A review by Kevin MacDonald of Yuri Slezkine’s book The Jewish Century contains a section entitled ‘Bolshevism As a Jewish Revolution’, beginning on p82 of this PDF.

    A review by Kevin MacDonald

    Kevin MacDonald is NOT a “scholar” of Russian Revolution (there were THREE of them between 1905 and October 1917) because he is not a scholar of Russian peasantry and warfare. US historiography is remarkably sterile whenever the only issue which matters–war and a conflict–comes up, since overwhelming majority of these scholars have no clue on the nature and application of military power. They also have no grasp of scale of the 20th century warfare and conflict in general. Israel Shamir is spot on when states that Jews were out of power in USSR by 1930s. They were flushed out, together with Civil War leftover nutjobbery. Jews are a popular and necessary topic to discuss but general Western ignorance on Russian peasantry would be comical, if not for it being so damaging to the, otherwise pathetically inadequate American “Russian Studies” field. Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Rottenborough
    Andrei Martyanov—In this instance it is Yuri Slezkine who lays claim to scholarship; Kevin MacDonald is simply the reviewer. Jewish power had indeed waned by the end of the 1930s but by then, as MacDonald writes on p84 of his review, ‘the worst of the slaughters in the Gulag, the purges, and the contrived famines had been completed.’ The extent of the slaughter is considered in Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’.
    , @Anon
    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.

    American communism was a Jewish affair from its founding by Russian immigrants in 1918 until 1930.

    In 1930 Stalin realized that a communist party consisting of foreigners who didn’t speak English concentrate. In NYC wouldn’t win many converts

    So Stalin made 4 decrees for the CPUSA

    1 40 percent Jewish quota for the CPUSA

    2 move headquarters to Chicago

    3 official language to be English and only English spoken among members

    4 head of the party not Jewish hence Gene Dennis and Gus Hall

    Maybe in Russia communism wasn’t a totally Jewish affair, but it certainly was in America.
    , @Sparkon

    Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.
     
    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in "the future world war" already by 1903?

    In that speech before a packed house of Parisian Jews, Nordau explained how the English offer of Uganda to the Jews for their homeland was just a step on the ladder to a world war leading to the establishment of a Jewish state:

    ...let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.
     
    Henry Ford, The International Jew, Chapter 14, Did the Jews Foresee the World War?

    http://www.unz.com/book/henry_ford__the-international-jew/

    For Nordau to speak so confidently and indeed accurately in 1903 of momentous events a decade or more in the future -- including a bloody world war -- underlines the fact that this plan must have been in motion already for some time well before Nordau's speech.

    The other part of the bargain, of course, was that Germany would be crushed -- not once, but twice -- while millions upon millions of Russians and Europeans died in the orgies of blood, and all of it just so the Jews could have Palestine.
    , @JJPeregrine

    ... [MacDonald] is not a scholar of Russian peasantry...
     
    Interesting.

    As a layman, it really is not clear to me what the state of Russian peasantry was after Tsar Alexander II abolished serfdom in Russia. It seems certain that some former serfs were able to become "kulaks," i.e. farmers who owned private farms, but the Kulak class appear only to have been a minority demographic, relative to the masses of former serfs (elsewhere, it is not clear to me whether the western practice of "tenant farming"--i.e., of leasing land in order for tenant farmers to cultivate commercial crops--ever arose in the aftermath of Alexander II's abolition of serfdom--as it did in the American South after the abolition of slavery).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. @Andrei Martyanov

    A review by Kevin MacDonald
     
    Kevin MacDonald is NOT a "scholar" of Russian Revolution (there were THREE of them between 1905 and October 1917) because he is not a scholar of Russian peasantry and warfare. US historiography is remarkably sterile whenever the only issue which matters--war and a conflict--comes up, since overwhelming majority of these scholars have no clue on the nature and application of military power. They also have no grasp of scale of the 20th century warfare and conflict in general. Israel Shamir is spot on when states that Jews were out of power in USSR by 1930s. They were flushed out, together with Civil War leftover nutjobbery. Jews are a popular and necessary topic to discuss but general Western ignorance on Russian peasantry would be comical, if not for it being so damaging to the, otherwise pathetically inadequate American "Russian Studies" field. Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.

    Andrei Martyanov—In this instance it is Yuri Slezkine who lays claim to scholarship; Kevin MacDonald is simply the reviewer. Jewish power had indeed waned by the end of the 1930s but by then, as MacDonald writes on p84 of his review, ‘the worst of the slaughters in the Gulag, the purges, and the contrived famines had been completed.’ The extent of the slaughter is considered in Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’
     
    You know, I don't know, maybe it is just me--but I prefer not this BS by some fringe "scholar"

    We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.
     
    But actual reliable data from opened Russian archives, starting from Zemskov's seminal study and ending up with such works of statistical analysis as Krivosheev. Dyukov may also do, among many others. All this data blows out of the water these BS myths about "tens of millions" killed in GULAG, which from 1923 through 1953 saw 850, 000 executed for a political reasons. What was that ("political reasons") is a separate issue. I will reiterate--US "academe" on Russia is largely not scientists but ideologues for a variety of reasons. Again, a sequence (three) of Russian Revolutions (albeit February 1917 coup was not real revolution) had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US "academe" on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to. Hence, as strange as it may sound, the other extreme of these "scholars" who go full Monty in inflating "GULAG" numbers into statistical absurdity which precludes procreation of the nation and leads to its demographic demise, yet--here we are with those pesky Russians still around. So, yes--with some exceptions (such Thurston, as one example), most of what passes in the US as "Soviet history" is a BS. Or, to put it politely, is nothing more than projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily--this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.
    , @ivan
    JR my old friend, a piece of perhaps superfluous advice: Do not engage in polemics with Andrei Martynov, one of the drones on this forum who will counter everything with a 'ah but he is not a scholar', and such like. Total waste of time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. @Johnny Rottenborough
    Andrei Martyanov—In this instance it is Yuri Slezkine who lays claim to scholarship; Kevin MacDonald is simply the reviewer. Jewish power had indeed waned by the end of the 1930s but by then, as MacDonald writes on p84 of his review, ‘the worst of the slaughters in the Gulag, the purges, and the contrived famines had been completed.’ The extent of the slaughter is considered in Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’.

    Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’

    You know, I don’t know, maybe it is just me–but I prefer not this BS by some fringe “scholar”

    We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

    But actual reliable data from opened Russian archives, starting from Zemskov’s seminal study and ending up with such works of statistical analysis as Krivosheev. Dyukov may also do, among many others. All this data blows out of the water these BS myths about “tens of millions” killed in GULAG, which from 1923 through 1953 saw 850, 000 executed for a political reasons. What was that (“political reasons”) is a separate issue. I will reiterate–US “academe” on Russia is largely not scientists but ideologues for a variety of reasons. Again, a sequence (three) of Russian Revolutions (albeit February 1917 coup was not real revolution) had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US “academe” on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to. Hence, as strange as it may sound, the other extreme of these “scholars” who go full Monty in inflating “GULAG” numbers into statistical absurdity which precludes procreation of the nation and leads to its demographic demise, yet–here we are with those pesky Russians still around. So, yes–with some exceptions (such Thurston, as one example), most of what passes in the US as “Soviet history” is a BS. Or, to put it politely, is nothing more than projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily–this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir

    projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily–this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.
     
    Very correct! Russians couldn't be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as "useful but tricky". Jews tried to take over ideology in 1920s, but they lost this niche pretty soon, when Stalin famously answered one of their vehement attacks on a Russian writer with "I haven't got other writers".
    , @animalogic
    "had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US “academe” on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to."
    There have been a number of articles on Unz recently suggesting/implying that really Russia was doing fine in 1917, the army was doing wonderfully, Russian industry was on the way to becoming a major capitalist player, & so on...if only the Bolsheviks hadn't tricked their way to power.
    Silly peasants, silly workers, & silly soldiers...
    It is also useful to lower the "jewish" influence on the Revolution. Trotsky has become the personification of the simple arithmetic: Globalist = Bolshevik = Jew. Trotsky was a "globalist" not because he was a Jew but because he realised (among other things & accurately as it turned out) that Socialism, isolated in a few nations was a "sitting duck" for capitalist counter revolution, undermining etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. I knew Sever Plocker personally; he was the chief editor of Al Hamishmar, the newspaper of MAPAM, left zionists, while I wrote a column in this newspaper. He was a Polish journalist who had to leave Poland after some anti-Jewish campaign. MAPAM was excited to take the guy with such impeccable credentials. He had brought the newspaper to untimely collapse and death, and then he switched the camps and became a right-winger. His anti-Communist articles gave him a new lease of life. Sever Plotcker is a real sleaze, a small treacherous Polish Jew. Not a man of knowledge nor of integrity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Not a man of knowledge nor of integrity.
     
    Which is basically a defining characteristic of majority of the so called Western "Sovietologists". My wish, of course never to be fulfilled, was to see Elena Prudnikova "debate" Solzhenitsyn on the issue of RKMP. Sad, sad, sad--old geezer died before seeing his RKMP being demolished by actual science and knowledge.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. @Andrei Martyanov

    Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’
     
    You know, I don't know, maybe it is just me--but I prefer not this BS by some fringe "scholar"

    We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.
     
    But actual reliable data from opened Russian archives, starting from Zemskov's seminal study and ending up with such works of statistical analysis as Krivosheev. Dyukov may also do, among many others. All this data blows out of the water these BS myths about "tens of millions" killed in GULAG, which from 1923 through 1953 saw 850, 000 executed for a political reasons. What was that ("political reasons") is a separate issue. I will reiterate--US "academe" on Russia is largely not scientists but ideologues for a variety of reasons. Again, a sequence (three) of Russian Revolutions (albeit February 1917 coup was not real revolution) had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US "academe" on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to. Hence, as strange as it may sound, the other extreme of these "scholars" who go full Monty in inflating "GULAG" numbers into statistical absurdity which precludes procreation of the nation and leads to its demographic demise, yet--here we are with those pesky Russians still around. So, yes--with some exceptions (such Thurston, as one example), most of what passes in the US as "Soviet history" is a BS. Or, to put it politely, is nothing more than projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily--this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.

    projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily–this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.

    Very correct! Russians couldn’t be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as “useful but tricky”. Jews tried to take over ideology in 1920s, but they lost this niche pretty soon, when Stalin famously answered one of their vehement attacks on a Russian writer with “I haven’t got other writers”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Very correct! Russians couldn’t be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as “useful but tricky”
     
    Many in local "Sovietologist" commentariat here will have a cognitive dissonance so strong when recognize the volume (huge) of anti-Zionist literature published in the USSR, that they may end up on anti-depressants. Obviously, we made a little of a progress when finally "learned" that first Sovnarkom had only one Jew in it--this is a good step in "healing" process. They may try to do a next step and at least try to learn what was War and post-War Soviet culture from literature to cinematography to have their brains re-arranged, but I doubt they will. In the end--maintaining closest association between "Bolsheviks"-Jews-GULAG-USSR is, for the most part, driven by a barely hidden Russophobia of Western elites. Some of them still use term Soviet when speaking of Russia. Again, they got shafted big time--can you imagine what it does to one's self-esteem? A historic irony of a massive proportions.
    , @Fidelios Automata
    That was one of the impressions I got from Unz's writings - that Jews predominated in early Bolshevism, and their viciousness had a component of tribal hatred. Perhaps that also explains why the modern intelligentsia gives Lenin (part Jewish) and Trotsky (Jewish) a pass for their early bloodbaths. Of course, the Bolsheviks also had lots of Poles, Baltics, and other ethnic minorities who hated the Russian people, too.
    I have heard my fellow libertarians say that leftists hate Stalin not because he massacred the peasantry but because his purges killed his fellow Communists. Might they also hate him because he ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. @Israel Shamir
    I knew Sever Plocker personally; he was the chief editor of Al Hamishmar, the newspaper of MAPAM, left zionists, while I wrote a column in this newspaper. He was a Polish journalist who had to leave Poland after some anti-Jewish campaign. MAPAM was excited to take the guy with such impeccable credentials. He had brought the newspaper to untimely collapse and death, and then he switched the camps and became a right-winger. His anti-Communist articles gave him a new lease of life. Sever Plotcker is a real sleaze, a small treacherous Polish Jew. Not a man of knowledge nor of integrity.

    Not a man of knowledge nor of integrity.

    Which is basically a defining characteristic of majority of the so called Western “Sovietologists”. My wish, of course never to be fulfilled, was to see Elena Prudnikova “debate” Solzhenitsyn on the issue of RKMP. Sad, sad, sad–old geezer died before seeing his RKMP being demolished by actual science and knowledge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. @Israel Shamir

    projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily–this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.
     
    Very correct! Russians couldn't be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as "useful but tricky". Jews tried to take over ideology in 1920s, but they lost this niche pretty soon, when Stalin famously answered one of their vehement attacks on a Russian writer with "I haven't got other writers".

    Very correct! Russians couldn’t be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as “useful but tricky”

    Many in local “Sovietologist” commentariat here will have a cognitive dissonance so strong when recognize the volume (huge) of anti-Zionist literature published in the USSR, that they may end up on anti-depressants. Obviously, we made a little of a progress when finally “learned” that first Sovnarkom had only one Jew in it–this is a good step in “healing” process. They may try to do a next step and at least try to learn what was War and post-War Soviet culture from literature to cinematography to have their brains re-arranged, but I doubt they will. In the end–maintaining closest association between “Bolsheviks”-Jews-GULAG-USSR is, for the most part, driven by a barely hidden Russophobia of Western elites. Some of them still use term Soviet when speaking of Russia. Again, they got shafted big time–can you imagine what it does to one’s self-esteem? A historic irony of a massive proportions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. I asked a Russian historian Dmitry Pokrov to write a few words about Sutton’s book.
    Here is his reply (google-translated from Russian)

    https://www.facebook.com/dpokrov/posts/10209522371975668

    Is there any truth there? Maybe there is, but lies and fancies are much greater. In something a minuscule role was played by a simple ignorance of the author, in some way his bias, and in some way his desire to create nonsense into logic – this gives an excuse for liberties.

    The first pages reveal the whole clumsiness of Sutton.

    “Robert Minor was a talented artist and writer, under the guise of which the Bolshevik revolutionary was hiding, in 1915 he was arrested in Russia on charges of subversion and later rescued by prominent Wall Street financiers.”

    Strangely enough, Minor never concealed his left-radicalism – he was a member of the US Socialist Party, a trade unionist, an anarchist, an active and open opponent of the imperialist war (all in a short time). And this was before October 1917.
    Well, in 1915, of course, no one arrested him in Russia. at this time he was in New York and worked in a socialist newspaper.
    He was arrested in France in 1919 (before that he managed to visit the RSFSR from May to November 1918) for subversive activities (calling for sabotage of arms supplies for the intervention forces in Russia), but he was saved not by Wall Street interference, but by his his own father, who was a judge of the Texas District Court and who connected his connections for this.

    So, in one sentence at once a lot of mistakes or deliberate lies (it is difficult to say what the author did and how conscious). Is it possible to believe after such a Sutton or simply take seriously his “works”? Of course not.

    Below we stumble upon other moments (I will not deal with everything, but only that here it is defined like a lie).

    “The National City Bank branch in Petrograd was released from the Bolshevik decree on nationalization – the only such case among foreign and domestic banks in Russia.”

    Not the only one, but the other way around. Societe General, Credit Lyonese, National City Bank – these three selectively taken banks of different countries (France and the USA) worked in Soviet Russia until 1920. And in 1920 the branches of these banks in the territory of the RSFSR were liquidated. But Sutton probably did not know about it. And if he knew, then religion did not allow him to mention French banks , because then the whole harmonious construction of the Bolsheviks-Wall Street would begin to crack.

    “One group of the Trotskyists immediately gained considerable influence in Mexico and wrote the Constitution of Queretaro for the revolutionary government of Carranza in 1917, thus giving Mexico the dubious honor of having the world’s first government that adopted the constitution
    Soviet type. ”

    Soviet type? So there were Soviets, then? It is interesting, however. And the Zapatists are Trotskyists, for example. That is, there was still no Trotskyism (well, in the sense that Trotsky had not yet become a bronze one), and the Zapatists had already struck Trotskyism? Well, yes, agrarians who actively participated in the Mexican revolution should not have insisted on their rights, according to the author. Yes, and it was Trotsky and the Trotskyites who prompted (through the Telegrams) the Liberal Party of Mexico to include in its 1906 program an eight-hour working day, a mandatory Sunday holiday and other “Trotskyisms” that later fell into the Mexican Constitution in 1917. And Andres Molina Enriquez (author of one of the articles of the Constitution) was probably also a prominent Trotskyite who came to Mexico.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
    This is excellent!
    , @Roland Heymanns
    This is a good disassembly of Antony Sutton. Hilarious.
    , @refl
    I appreciate that the idea of a jewish take over of Russia in the revolution is being demolished here, as it simply leads historical revisionism (well, in the West it is revisionism - I suppose the discussion among Russian historians to be somewhat more advanced) down the wrong way and an unhealthy one at that.

    Still, I take away from Sutton that Trotzky was moved to New York to secure influence in Russia after the revolution for the banks. The timetable of his movements suggests that the overthrow of the tsar was premeditaded by the anglosaxon elite well in advance (he was expelled from France to Spain already in October 1916, I believe).
    And I would suppose that with this background he had no chance ever to become Lenins successor.

    By 1917 it was clear that Germanys defeat was aproaching and the British empire would bot allow Russia to have their share in the spoils of victory.
    The tsar might have accepted a separate peace with Germany and was indeed overthrown by a new government that was hellbent on keeping its catastrophic obligation to the Entente.
    This led to the complete military breakdown of the 1917 offensive and subsequent breakdown of any order in Russia. The goal to defeat Germany and demolish Russia in the same act was achieved.

    My source: firtsworldwarhiddenhistory (in a rudimentary summary).

    By the way, western historiography on Russia is certainly mainly infantile. For ever so many years I have tried to understand just the deathtoll of stalinism and wondered, why the numbers never really add up - well, they were not meant to add up, but to be HUGE.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @Israel Shamir
    I asked a Russian historian Dmitry Pokrov to write a few words about Sutton's book.
    Here is his reply (google-translated from Russian)
    https://www.facebook.com/dpokrov/posts/10209522371975668
    Is there any truth there? Maybe there is, but lies and fancies are much greater. In something a minuscule role was played by a simple ignorance of the author, in some way his bias, and in some way his desire to create nonsense into logic - this gives an excuse for liberties.

    The first pages reveal the whole clumsiness of Sutton.

    "Robert Minor was a talented artist and writer, under the guise of which the Bolshevik revolutionary was hiding, in 1915 he was arrested in Russia on charges of subversion and later rescued by prominent Wall Street financiers."

    Strangely enough, Minor never concealed his left-radicalism - he was a member of the US Socialist Party, a trade unionist, an anarchist, an active and open opponent of the imperialist war (all in a short time). And this was before October 1917.
    Well, in 1915, of course, no one arrested him in Russia. at this time he was in New York and worked in a socialist newspaper.
    He was arrested in France in 1919 (before that he managed to visit the RSFSR from May to November 1918) for subversive activities (calling for sabotage of arms supplies for the intervention forces in Russia), but he was saved not by Wall Street interference, but by his his own father, who was a judge of the Texas District Court and who connected his connections for this.

    So, in one sentence at once a lot of mistakes or deliberate lies (it is difficult to say what the author did and how conscious). Is it possible to believe after such a Sutton or simply take seriously his "works"? Of course not.

    Below we stumble upon other moments (I will not deal with everything, but only that here it is defined like a lie).

    "The National City Bank branch in Petrograd was released from the Bolshevik decree on nationalization - the only such case among foreign and domestic banks in Russia."

    Not the only one, but the other way around. Societe General, Credit Lyonese, National City Bank - these three selectively taken banks of different countries (France and the USA) worked in Soviet Russia until 1920. And in 1920 the branches of these banks in the territory of the RSFSR were liquidated. But Sutton probably did not know about it. And if he knew, then religion did not allow him to mention French banks , because then the whole harmonious construction of the Bolsheviks-Wall Street would begin to crack.

    "One group of the Trotskyists immediately gained considerable influence in Mexico and wrote the Constitution of Queretaro for the revolutionary government of Carranza in 1917, thus giving Mexico the dubious honor of having the world's first government that adopted the constitution
    Soviet type. "

    Soviet type? So there were Soviets, then? It is interesting, however. And the Zapatists are Trotskyists, for example. That is, there was still no Trotskyism (well, in the sense that Trotsky had not yet become a bronze one), and the Zapatists had already struck Trotskyism? Well, yes, agrarians who actively participated in the Mexican revolution should not have insisted on their rights, according to the author. Yes, and it was Trotsky and the Trotskyites who prompted (through the Telegrams) the Liberal Party of Mexico to include in its 1906 program an eight-hour working day, a mandatory Sunday holiday and other "Trotskyisms" that later fell into the Mexican Constitution in 1917. And Andres Molina Enriquez (author of one of the articles of the Constitution) was probably also a prominent Trotskyite who came to Mexico.

    This is excellent!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. @Brabantian
    Regarding what Israel Shamir writes above, that

    The Supreme Court is the real highest authority of the United States, exactly as the Jews prefer
     
    This is only true in practice but not according to the (neglected and essentially dead) US Constitution, which makes the Congress quite 'supreme' over the judges

    According to that 1789 piece of paper, the US Congress has full unlimited authority to remove from office any and all federal national judges, including all those of the Supreme Court, for 'lack of good behaviour', i.e., for not honouring the Constitution, for making bad & ugly decisions, etc - No accusation of crime or misdeeds is needed at all

    This power by the US Congress, impeachment to take place in the US House of Representatives, trial in the US Senate, is quite unlimited and at the discretion of the Congress itself

    But that power is almost never exercised, with only a handful of US judges removed in this way in USA history ... the US Congress in general submits to the oligarch game of making a fetish of 'the law' as something they pretend they cannot control whilst it serves oligarch interests

    It’s not for nothing that the first of the seven articles in the US Constitution references the legislative branch–not the executive or judicial (“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives”). The Founders knew what they were doing. They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a “democracy”).

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Ummm. The constitution gives authority to make laws to the congress, but President Madison caved in to judicial supremacy as early as 1804 Marbury vs Madison.

    Only 2 Presidents have refused to obey a Supreme Court order. President Jackson in the 1830s refused to obey a Supreme Court order to leave some of the tribal Cherokees on their Tennessee lands.

    President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1861, soon after he became President. A lawsuit was filed to overturn the presidential executive order. The Supreme Court ruled against Lincoln that the president does not have the authority to suspend habeas corpus.

    Lincoln ignored the Supreme Court order and kept more than 40,000 dissidents in prison until he died.

    The founders were elites. They wrote the constitution to ensure judicial supremacy by a Supreme Court that represented the elite. As early as possible, Marbury vs Madison established judicial supremacy in 1804.

    Rule by law suits and judges is nothing new n America. Look at gay marriage look at judicial orders about public bathrooms and trans gender freaks.

    Judges rule and have since 1804
    , @Aramis Kretzer

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.
     
    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain, I can't see as how they have "abdicated" authority they had no intention of applying. They are scoundrels, plain and simple. Who expects scoundrels to carry out Constitutional responsibilities?
    , @jacques sheete

    The Founders knew what they were doing.
     
    Yes, they did, and it wasn't purdy, at least from a freedom lovers point of view. In fact, the antifeds warned of what it would do, and in particular, some were none too happy with the power placed in the judiciary,as I recall.

    They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a "democracy").
     
    You really must provide support for that contention otherwise it's just an old myth, and a very silly one as well.

    The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.

    It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)

    Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle

    mises.org/daily/4254

     

    Read it and be duped no more.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. nickels says:

    Indeed there is no better tool against Jewish supremacy than the glorious name of Christ; but it will take time and effort for Americans to recognise that.

    Bingo. This thing goes one way or the other. Christ or AntiChrist.

    Read More
    • Agree: Felix-Culpa
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Christ = Jew.
    Antichrist = Anti-Jew.
    Is anti-Jew a problem with you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. utu says:

    Shamir’s love for communism and its icons incurable.

    Claims that Lenin took money from German military had been disproven long time ago.

    Moreover, there is nothing wrong about taking money from wealthy Jews.

    Lenin’s attitude was simple and straightforward: take money from whoever gives, do only what you should.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. @Israel Shamir
    I asked a Russian historian Dmitry Pokrov to write a few words about Sutton's book.
    Here is his reply (google-translated from Russian)
    https://www.facebook.com/dpokrov/posts/10209522371975668
    Is there any truth there? Maybe there is, but lies and fancies are much greater. In something a minuscule role was played by a simple ignorance of the author, in some way his bias, and in some way his desire to create nonsense into logic - this gives an excuse for liberties.

    The first pages reveal the whole clumsiness of Sutton.

    "Robert Minor was a talented artist and writer, under the guise of which the Bolshevik revolutionary was hiding, in 1915 he was arrested in Russia on charges of subversion and later rescued by prominent Wall Street financiers."

    Strangely enough, Minor never concealed his left-radicalism - he was a member of the US Socialist Party, a trade unionist, an anarchist, an active and open opponent of the imperialist war (all in a short time). And this was before October 1917.
    Well, in 1915, of course, no one arrested him in Russia. at this time he was in New York and worked in a socialist newspaper.
    He was arrested in France in 1919 (before that he managed to visit the RSFSR from May to November 1918) for subversive activities (calling for sabotage of arms supplies for the intervention forces in Russia), but he was saved not by Wall Street interference, but by his his own father, who was a judge of the Texas District Court and who connected his connections for this.

    So, in one sentence at once a lot of mistakes or deliberate lies (it is difficult to say what the author did and how conscious). Is it possible to believe after such a Sutton or simply take seriously his "works"? Of course not.

    Below we stumble upon other moments (I will not deal with everything, but only that here it is defined like a lie).

    "The National City Bank branch in Petrograd was released from the Bolshevik decree on nationalization - the only such case among foreign and domestic banks in Russia."

    Not the only one, but the other way around. Societe General, Credit Lyonese, National City Bank - these three selectively taken banks of different countries (France and the USA) worked in Soviet Russia until 1920. And in 1920 the branches of these banks in the territory of the RSFSR were liquidated. But Sutton probably did not know about it. And if he knew, then religion did not allow him to mention French banks , because then the whole harmonious construction of the Bolsheviks-Wall Street would begin to crack.

    "One group of the Trotskyists immediately gained considerable influence in Mexico and wrote the Constitution of Queretaro for the revolutionary government of Carranza in 1917, thus giving Mexico the dubious honor of having the world's first government that adopted the constitution
    Soviet type. "

    Soviet type? So there were Soviets, then? It is interesting, however. And the Zapatists are Trotskyists, for example. That is, there was still no Trotskyism (well, in the sense that Trotsky had not yet become a bronze one), and the Zapatists had already struck Trotskyism? Well, yes, agrarians who actively participated in the Mexican revolution should not have insisted on their rights, according to the author. Yes, and it was Trotsky and the Trotskyites who prompted (through the Telegrams) the Liberal Party of Mexico to include in its 1906 program an eight-hour working day, a mandatory Sunday holiday and other "Trotskyisms" that later fell into the Mexican Constitution in 1917. And Andres Molina Enriquez (author of one of the articles of the Constitution) was probably also a prominent Trotskyite who came to Mexico.

    This is a good disassembly of Antony Sutton. Hilarious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Andrei Martyanov

    Sever Plocker’s 2006 Ynet article, ‘Stalin’s Jews’
     
    You know, I don't know, maybe it is just me--but I prefer not this BS by some fringe "scholar"

    We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.
     
    But actual reliable data from opened Russian archives, starting from Zemskov's seminal study and ending up with such works of statistical analysis as Krivosheev. Dyukov may also do, among many others. All this data blows out of the water these BS myths about "tens of millions" killed in GULAG, which from 1923 through 1953 saw 850, 000 executed for a political reasons. What was that ("political reasons") is a separate issue. I will reiterate--US "academe" on Russia is largely not scientists but ideologues for a variety of reasons. Again, a sequence (three) of Russian Revolutions (albeit February 1917 coup was not real revolution) had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US "academe" on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to. Hence, as strange as it may sound, the other extreme of these "scholars" who go full Monty in inflating "GULAG" numbers into statistical absurdity which precludes procreation of the nation and leads to its demographic demise, yet--here we are with those pesky Russians still around. So, yes--with some exceptions (such Thurston, as one example), most of what passes in the US as "Soviet history" is a BS. Or, to put it politely, is nothing more than projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily--this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.

    “had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US “academe” on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to.”
    There have been a number of articles on Unz recently suggesting/implying that really Russia was doing fine in 1917, the army was doing wonderfully, Russian industry was on the way to becoming a major capitalist player, & so on…if only the Bolsheviks hadn’t tricked their way to power.
    Silly peasants, silly workers, & silly soldiers…
    It is also useful to lower the “jewish” influence on the Revolution. Trotsky has become the personification of the simple arithmetic: Globalist = Bolshevik = Jew. Trotsky was a “globalist” not because he was a Jew but because he realised (among other things & accurately as it turned out) that Socialism, isolated in a few nations was a “sitting duck” for capitalist counter revolution, undermining etc.

    Read More
    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    There have been a number of articles on Unz recently suggesting/implying that really Russia was doing fine in 1917, the army was doing wonderfully, Russian industry was on the way to becoming a major capitalist player, & so on…if only the Bolsheviks hadn’t tricked their way to power.
     
    Yep, delusion bubbles are difficult to burst for people who have no clue. My favorite example is Averchenko's hilarious Specialist in Military Affairs.

    Silly peasants, silly workers, & silly soldiers…
     
    Absolutely, they never knew what's good for them. Instead of continuing to die in millions or accept the fact that the hunger became a defining feature of Imperial Russia they decided that they had enough. Obviously, the people who write about how good those stupid Russians had it would shit their pants even from the sound of 76-mm gun near them or would cry mommie dearest after 48 in the trenches but it is all good and dandy when one "educates" oneself on all kinds of fringe ahistorical BS.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @animalogic
    "had very little to do with Jews but with a horrendous state the Empire found itself first by losing Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and then bleeding white on the fronts of WW I and later of the Civil War. As I stated, most US “academe” on Russia has no concept nor reference points on what the loss of combined 5-6 million in WW I alone can lead to."
    There have been a number of articles on Unz recently suggesting/implying that really Russia was doing fine in 1917, the army was doing wonderfully, Russian industry was on the way to becoming a major capitalist player, & so on...if only the Bolsheviks hadn't tricked their way to power.
    Silly peasants, silly workers, & silly soldiers...
    It is also useful to lower the "jewish" influence on the Revolution. Trotsky has become the personification of the simple arithmetic: Globalist = Bolshevik = Jew. Trotsky was a "globalist" not because he was a Jew but because he realised (among other things & accurately as it turned out) that Socialism, isolated in a few nations was a "sitting duck" for capitalist counter revolution, undermining etc.

    There have been a number of articles on Unz recently suggesting/implying that really Russia was doing fine in 1917, the army was doing wonderfully, Russian industry was on the way to becoming a major capitalist player, & so on…if only the Bolsheviks hadn’t tricked their way to power.

    Yep, delusion bubbles are difficult to burst for people who have no clue. My favorite example is Averchenko’s hilarious Specialist in Military Affairs.

    Silly peasants, silly workers, & silly soldiers…

    Absolutely, they never knew what’s good for them. Instead of continuing to die in millions or accept the fact that the hunger became a defining feature of Imperial Russia they decided that they had enough. Obviously, the people who write about how good those stupid Russians had it would shit their pants even from the sound of 76-mm gun near them or would cry mommie dearest after 48 in the trenches but it is all good and dandy when one “educates” oneself on all kinds of fringe ahistorical BS.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @Israel Shamir

    projection by humiliated and subdued WASPies who still cannot grasp how did they get owned by Jews so easily–this is a historic fact. This is known as a butt-hurt.
     
    Very correct! Russians couldn't be subdued by Jews, whom they considered as "useful but tricky". Jews tried to take over ideology in 1920s, but they lost this niche pretty soon, when Stalin famously answered one of their vehement attacks on a Russian writer with "I haven't got other writers".

    That was one of the impressions I got from Unz’s writings – that Jews predominated in early Bolshevism, and their viciousness had a component of tribal hatred. Perhaps that also explains why the modern intelligentsia gives Lenin (part Jewish) and Trotsky (Jewish) a pass for their early bloodbaths. Of course, the Bolsheviks also had lots of Poles, Baltics, and other ethnic minorities who hated the Russian people, too.
    I have heard my fellow libertarians say that leftists hate Stalin not because he massacred the peasantry but because his purges killed his fellow Communists. Might they also hate him because he ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    Stalin

    ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party
     
    ?
    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way (his one Jewish ancestor had been received into Church), not more than he was a German, a Swede, a Kalmyk, and ethnic Russian. Trotsky was so non-Jewish, he didn't even understand Yiddisch. Stalin used to say that parting with Mensheviks had an effect of a pogrom, as the party had got rid of Jews.
    Stalin rolled back Jewish positions in the Party and in the state down to normal, still much more than by their share in population, but not like in the US. Stalin was ok with good loyal Jews. Kaganovich remained loyal to Stalin till the end of his days.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one’s health, but I’ve long had the impression (perhaps because I’m an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I’ve often speculated that it’s because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir

    tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Could be good explanation! Or perhaps they wanted to show they can do anything - from banning smoke to enforcing buggery. Now they attack Monsanto - surely evil company, but I'd say - it is not courts' business.
    , @Kiza
    Yes I had very similar thoughts. However, the hate-tobacco is a global phenomenon and thus has a soft connection to the Southern US tobacco growers. For me, tobacco was more like test of mind control over the population, once the levers of influence tools were in the right hands, the so called banning brigade.

    As a never-smoker and a libertarian my first thought about tobacco has always been - put your head within a meter of a vehicle exhaust pipe in any city and check out what happens to your life expectanxy. At least the smokers breath a natural product and through a filter.

    One elementary societal rule is: ban things that are less important to avoid banning things which are more important but earn the rullers a tidy profit. Banning of fat when sugar was a much bigger health risk is a wonderful other example, with huge health impact over several generations.

    , @Anon
    Prescription drug abuse is just another liberal crusade so useless liberals with useless grievance studies degrees can become grant hustling non profit foundation busybodies.

    If a patient gets 30 pills a month, 1 a day and can’t get more than 30 pills a month how can they abuse them? Take 3 a day for 10 days and then have none for the rest of the month?

    Prescription pill hysteria is no different than the second hand smoke hysteria and driven by the same Carrie Nation Puritan busybodies that brought us prohibition, feminism, school bussing and affirmative action ; puritanical liberal grant hustlers.

    Leave medical treatment and prescription medicine to the experts, the Drs and their patients, not the Hildabeast Clinton voters.

    Don’t believe anything about medicine on the internet unless a Dr gives you his or her password to a Drs only website. Also, subscribe to medical magazines for Drs, not amateur “ health” magazines
    , @Anon
    I also believe the liberal anti pain medicine crusade is just an excuse to create more government drug enforcement jobs for liberals and another burden in the tax payer.
    , @Seraphim
    Many smokers had this impression at the very beginning of the crusade. Your truly yours and his better half among them, although we have no partiality for or against southerners because of their whiteness or lack thereof. We thought that was a war against 'old money' and an iconic industry of America.
    , @Andrei Martyanov

    that it’s because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Very well could be. I am a former smoker--smoked for 20 years. Yet, I was outraged when a-holes forbade smoking in the bars. I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one. Hell, this is why bars were created.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. @Fidelios Automata
    That was one of the impressions I got from Unz's writings - that Jews predominated in early Bolshevism, and their viciousness had a component of tribal hatred. Perhaps that also explains why the modern intelligentsia gives Lenin (part Jewish) and Trotsky (Jewish) a pass for their early bloodbaths. Of course, the Bolsheviks also had lots of Poles, Baltics, and other ethnic minorities who hated the Russian people, too.
    I have heard my fellow libertarians say that leftists hate Stalin not because he massacred the peasantry but because his purges killed his fellow Communists. Might they also hate him because he ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party?

    Stalin

    ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party

    ?
    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way (his one Jewish ancestor had been received into Church), not more than he was a German, a Swede, a Kalmyk, and ethnic Russian. Trotsky was so non-Jewish, he didn’t even understand Yiddisch. Stalin used to say that parting with Mensheviks had an effect of a pogrom, as the party had got rid of Jews.
    Stalin rolled back Jewish positions in the Party and in the state down to normal, still much more than by their share in population, but not like in the US. Stalin was ok with good loyal Jews. Kaganovich remained loyal to Stalin till the end of his days.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way
     
    In fact, his lineage was that of low-level nobility which absolutely precludes him being Jewish since Jews were verboten from any noble titles in Russia. Simple as that. Moreover, I am always fascinated by the fact of total disregard of, say, Maxim Gorky's (Peshkov) immense ideological influence and role in Russian Marxism, together with Savva Morozov's support of revolutionary movement.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Could be good explanation! Or perhaps they wanted to show they can do anything – from banning smoke to enforcing buggery. Now they attack Monsanto – surely evil company, but I’d say – it is not courts’ business.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the "white ethnics" they live elbow-to-asshole with (Irish, Italian, Polish, even Arab) in the Northern cities?

    Since the South is so far away compared to Irish-Catholics in Boston or Italians in Jersey?
    , @mcohen
    Tobacco will be phased out because you cannot eat it.the land is needed to grow food.it is that simple.
    , @mcohen
    Israel shamir says

    "So indeed there is a great need to bring democracy to the US by restoring President’s constitutional powers and by severely curbing unconstitutional Jewish powers. And fine articles by Ron Unz could be a great start for this road to real American independence."

    You have it the wrong way round.this has nothing to do with trump or democracy.it is simply a line in the sand of what defines a jewish person.

    Fake news and fake jews gimme the blues
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Re: “For more than 50 years, the Catholic Church has lost every battle in the culture wars.”

    Of course. It has been destroyed byVatican II. The last Pope was Pius XII.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Catholics worshiped Jews, long before Vatican II or any other lame excuse you may concoct.

    "To the Jews 'belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship...'"

    Catechism of the Catholic Church
     
    Just like the Jew Testament says. No theological hairsplitting can undo such a horrible foundation.

    "We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews." John 4:22
     
    What white man needs "saved," anyway, by a Jew or otherwise? Saved from what?
    , @Notanisraeli
    It's not a "lame excuse" you nitwit. It's a very cogent reference to a crucial change inthe Church of the last 50 years. Think!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    A review by Kevin MacDonald
     
    Kevin MacDonald is NOT a "scholar" of Russian Revolution (there were THREE of them between 1905 and October 1917) because he is not a scholar of Russian peasantry and warfare. US historiography is remarkably sterile whenever the only issue which matters--war and a conflict--comes up, since overwhelming majority of these scholars have no clue on the nature and application of military power. They also have no grasp of scale of the 20th century warfare and conflict in general. Israel Shamir is spot on when states that Jews were out of power in USSR by 1930s. They were flushed out, together with Civil War leftover nutjobbery. Jews are a popular and necessary topic to discuss but general Western ignorance on Russian peasantry would be comical, if not for it being so damaging to the, otherwise pathetically inadequate American "Russian Studies" field. Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.

    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.

    American communism was a Jewish affair from its founding by Russian immigrants in 1918 until 1930.

    In 1930 Stalin realized that a communist party consisting of foreigners who didn’t speak English concentrate. In NYC wouldn’t win many converts

    So Stalin made 4 decrees for the CPUSA

    1 40 percent Jewish quota for the CPUSA

    2 move headquarters to Chicago

    3 official language to be English and only English spoken among members

    4 head of the party not Jewish hence Gene Dennis and Gus Hall

    Maybe in Russia communism wasn’t a totally Jewish affair, but it certainly was in America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.
     
    Again, this is precisely my point--Dr. MacDonald cannot possibly make any sound judgements on "Jewish influence" on Russian "communism" precisely for the reasons of Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called "Russia Studies" field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia's 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific. In other words: wind doesn't blow because crowns of trees are moving, it is the other way around. But then again, generally Western "humanities" and policy fields have issues with causalities--the empirical evidence of this is overwhelming. This is one of the major reasons why the US finds herself where it is and why her decline continues and, in fact, accelerates.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Kiza says:
    @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Yes I had very similar thoughts. However, the hate-tobacco is a global phenomenon and thus has a soft connection to the Southern US tobacco growers. For me, tobacco was more like test of mind control over the population, once the levers of influence tools were in the right hands, the so called banning brigade.

    As a never-smoker and a libertarian my first thought about tobacco has always been – put your head within a meter of a vehicle exhaust pipe in any city and check out what happens to your life expectanxy. At least the smokers breath a natural product and through a filter.

    One elementary societal rule is: ban things that are less important to avoid banning things which are more important but earn the rullers a tidy profit. Banning of fat when sugar was a much bigger health risk is a wonderful other example, with huge health impact over several generations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I don't disagree with your approach in so far as you are endorsing Labor Senator Pat Kennely's fondly quoted words "in any race in which Self Interest is running bet your short on him". However I am not sure about your sugar v. fat example. I've been as reliable a faddish as most and also an observer of medical fashions and limitations. I don't see any lobbying by sugar interests (including those who may have wanted to sweeten drinks with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners) as having more clout or reason to use it than producers of butter, full cream milk or ice cream, or fat on the hoof - not to mention producers of polyunsaturated spreads which were medically fashionable for decades until recently.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I don't disagree with your approach in so far as you are endorsing Labor Senator Pat Kennelly's fondly quoted words "in any race in which Self Interest is running bet your shi8rt on him". However I am not sure about your sugar v. fat example. I've been as reliably faddish as most and also an observer of medical fashions and limitations. I don't see any lobbying by sugar interests (including those who may have wanted to sweeten drinks with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners) as having more clout or reason to use it than producers of butter, full cream milk or ice cream, or fat on the hoof - not to mention producers of polyunsaturated spreads which were medically fashionable for decades until recently.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Prescription drug abuse is just another liberal crusade so useless liberals with useless grievance studies degrees can become grant hustling non profit foundation busybodies.

    If a patient gets 30 pills a month, 1 a day and can’t get more than 30 pills a month how can they abuse them? Take 3 a day for 10 days and then have none for the rest of the month?

    Prescription pill hysteria is no different than the second hand smoke hysteria and driven by the same Carrie Nation Puritan busybodies that brought us prohibition, feminism, school bussing and affirmative action ; puritanical liberal grant hustlers.

    Leave medical treatment and prescription medicine to the experts, the Drs and their patients, not the Hildabeast Clinton voters.

    Don’t believe anything about medicine on the internet unless a Dr gives you his or her password to a Drs only website. Also, subscribe to medical magazines for Drs, not amateur “ health” magazines

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    My old Congress critter, Henry Waxman was the anti tobacco point man in congress for 30 years. It may be true that the Jewish attorney attack in tobacco was anti southern and anti rural. Tobacco is very easy to grow and very profitable as long as you have enough land to keep rotating and replenishing the tobacco fields. Jews really hate the idea that anyone doing manual work can make a decent living

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    ...Look what they've done to all those Italian mechanics and construction workers on the Northeast Coast. Not to mention Irish-American bar-owners.

    Damn Jews really crushed those unions in the Northeast.

    Especially since they vote Democrat and these folks always try to bring up the minimum wage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    I also believe the liberal anti pain medicine crusade is just an excuse to create more government drug enforcement jobs for liberals and another burden in the tax payer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. ‘Adoration of the jew’.
    It reminds me of that jews are capable of huge self delusion.
    In each UN General Assembly or some similar election the world is against Israel.
    Even in Germany, where since 1953 anyone has been brainwashed with the holocaust guilt, Israel is more and more under criticism.

    Even with British Labour Israel is seen by some of having perpetrated Sept 11.
    The brave IDF warriors killing inmates of the concentration camp Gaza caused disgust around the world.
    Hungary does anything it can to keep Soros out of the country, Polish socialists call the followers of Soros Sorosjugend.
    In France, Belgium, the Netherlands, even Germany, jews or jewish property is attacked.

    Of course control by jewry of politicians and media may make jews think they’re adored.
    Soros is said to control 230 members of the European parliament.
    British BBC, and Dutch NOS, led by jews.
    Media kings as Murdoch, Chaim Saban, Fox, Soros bought the Guardian, control 80% or more of western media.
    So indeed, jews who do not take into considerations all these things may think they’re adored.

    The Corbyn speech should have been a warning, if the Labour leader is of the opinion that it is necessary to fight antisemitism, adoration of jews, in my opinion, does not exist at all.
    Historians know that when it is necessary to speak out on things that were selfevident, that selfevidence is gone.
    Around 1870 the pope was declared infallible, this meant that his infallibility did no longer exist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Prester John
    It's not for nothing that the first of the seven articles in the US Constitution references the legislative branch--not the executive or judicial ("All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives"). The Founders knew what they were doing. They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a "democracy").

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    Ummm. The constitution gives authority to make laws to the congress, but President Madison caved in to judicial supremacy as early as 1804 Marbury vs Madison.

    Only 2 Presidents have refused to obey a Supreme Court order. President Jackson in the 1830s refused to obey a Supreme Court order to leave some of the tribal Cherokees on their Tennessee lands.

    President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1861, soon after he became President. A lawsuit was filed to overturn the presidential executive order. The Supreme Court ruled against Lincoln that the president does not have the authority to suspend habeas corpus.

    Lincoln ignored the Supreme Court order and kept more than 40,000 dissidents in prison until he died.

    The founders were elites. They wrote the constitution to ensure judicial supremacy by a Supreme Court that represented the elite. As early as possible, Marbury vs Madison established judicial supremacy in 1804.

    Rule by law suits and judges is nothing new n America. Look at gay marriage look at judicial orders about public bathrooms and trans gender freaks.

    Judges rule and have since 1804

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    Great comments there!

    One tiny clarification, sorry.

    Judges rule and have since 1804
     
    Pretty close.

    They seem to function as agents for certain elements of the money bag crowd and they undoubtedly do as they are told, or else. I think they are tools of our rulers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Decades before Jewish attorneys went after tobacco smoking they effected school desegregation school bussing affirmative action and uncontrolled black on White crime.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. Respect says:
    @Brabantian
    Regarding what Israel Shamir writes above, that

    The Supreme Court is the real highest authority of the United States, exactly as the Jews prefer
     
    This is only true in practice but not according to the (neglected and essentially dead) US Constitution, which makes the Congress quite 'supreme' over the judges

    According to that 1789 piece of paper, the US Congress has full unlimited authority to remove from office any and all federal national judges, including all those of the Supreme Court, for 'lack of good behaviour', i.e., for not honouring the Constitution, for making bad & ugly decisions, etc - No accusation of crime or misdeeds is needed at all

    This power by the US Congress, impeachment to take place in the US House of Representatives, trial in the US Senate, is quite unlimited and at the discretion of the Congress itself

    But that power is almost never exercised, with only a handful of US judges removed in this way in USA history ... the US Congress in general submits to the oligarch game of making a fetish of 'the law' as something they pretend they cannot control whilst it serves oligarch interests

    Thomas Hobbes , 1588-1679 , an englisman , said that ” Auctoritas non veritas facet legem ” , or Authorithy , no truth , makes the law . And he agreed with that . He thought that the Authority of the State is above the truth , above everything . He also said that ” The State of the rule of Law must control people authoritarily ” .
    So he was a despot ,a tyrant , a liar , at the service of a totalitarian English State .

    Enmanuel Kant , 1724-1804 , a german , preached the Rechtstat , the State of the rule of Law , in which ” the Law is above everything , and the State is above the Law ” . He proposes that a legal administration , a legal normativism , must say whats is good and evil , He defends the absolute tiranny of the Law at the service of the Absolutist State .
    So he was also a tirant ,a despot , a liar , at the service of a totalitarian Prussian State ,

    So do not blame averything on the jews , western lawyers and politicians have created along the last 4 centuries a totalitarian monster , that puts himself above the truth , above logic, above reason , above the people , above reality , above common sense , above God .

    No wonder that a despotic and demented west is producing more and more rejection both in non western countries and in its own population .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. We’re all ‘of a type developed by Adam and Eve’, and although stereotypes – like the Schrödinger equation – can describe an ensemble of people, they are useless for the individual. This is why you can’t use previous data to classify newly met individuals – only personal data classifies a person.

    But it’s fair to say the closer the individuals are to their group, the more united and less varied the group is. Insularity brings unity. That’s why the Japanese. That’s also why you can even remove a sura of the Quran if the whole Ummah agrees – perfect agreement is like God’s voice within a direct democracy.

    Roman Law is by no definition always better than the law of custom. Oral law is important too. It doesn’t works for jus cogens because there is no jurisdiction, it worked for (pre 19th century) the UK’s law of custom, before the state butted in and made everything much more statutory and puritan.

    When they had cities, Roman law was better. When they wandered, oral law was better. Now that they have cities, why are they still wandering spiritually?

    Lenin was an idiot whose Bolsheviks seized the media/communication lines in Russia, and finally went back to the NEP. Stalin was the real genius.

    If Trump could write or converse better than a four year old, he could just try ask them to power share on TV, give the %es to the public and say I’m nominating a Catholic (clean one, somewhere – get a woman, better odds).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. Seraphim says:
    @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Many smokers had this impression at the very beginning of the crusade. Your truly yours and his better half among them, although we have no partiality for or against southerners because of their whiteness or lack thereof. We thought that was a war against ‘old money’ and an iconic industry of America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    We thought that was a war against ‘old money’ and an iconic industry of America.
     
    It would be good to research who is behind marijuana industry.
    http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/why-do-we-underplay-the-links-between-cannabis-and-psychosis/#comment-2394885
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. utu says:
    @Seraphim
    Many smokers had this impression at the very beginning of the crusade. Your truly yours and his better half among them, although we have no partiality for or against southerners because of their whiteness or lack thereof. We thought that was a war against 'old money' and an iconic industry of America.

    We thought that was a war against ‘old money’ and an iconic industry of America.

    It would be good to research who is behind marijuana industry.

    http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/why-do-we-underplay-the-links-between-cannabis-and-psychosis/#comment-2394885

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    Did anybody here ever GO TO COLLEGE? Pot fries about half the people that use it? I was a pothead in college.

    Most people quit getting high everyday after they graduate from college. But we all know those guys that dropped out and drifted to Washington state and live in a tree somewhere.

    Some people are wasted as bad on pot as they would be on any other drug-and I was toking in the 90's on common-or-garden pot.

    Many smokers are successful people. Not now, because less people smoke in general, but tobacco does not turn a person into schizophrenia. Psychoactive drugs do that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. utu says:

    STALIN’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS, JEWS AS A HOSTILE ELITE IN THE USSR

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SlezkineRev.pdf

    Kevin MacDonald’s review of Yuri Slezkine’s “The Jewish Century”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  39. @Anon
    My old Congress critter, Henry Waxman was the anti tobacco point man in congress for 30 years. It may be true that the Jewish attorney attack in tobacco was anti southern and anti rural. Tobacco is very easy to grow and very profitable as long as you have enough land to keep rotating and replenishing the tobacco fields. Jews really hate the idea that anyone doing manual work can make a decent living

    …Look what they’ve done to all those Italian mechanics and construction workers on the Northeast Coast. Not to mention Irish-American bar-owners.

    Damn Jews really crushed those unions in the Northeast.

    Especially since they vote Democrat and these folks always try to bring up the minimum wage.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    You mean LATINO construction workers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Israel Shamir

    tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Could be good explanation! Or perhaps they wanted to show they can do anything - from banning smoke to enforcing buggery. Now they attack Monsanto - surely evil company, but I'd say - it is not courts' business.

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with (Irish, Italian, Polish, even Arab) in the Northern cities?

    Since the South is so far away compared to Irish-Catholics in Boston or Italians in Jersey?

    Read More
    • Replies: @bj
    You are probably familiar with E Michael Jones's work on ethnic cleansing of American cities, but for those not familiar here is one of his talks......

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ow5wVv2FNs
    , @Crawfurdmuir

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with
     
    My impression is that it has a lot to do with the lynching of Leo Frank in 1915. That incident prompted the founding of the ADL.

    Many northern urban Jews who have never travelled south of the Potomac have the idea that the South is and always was a hotbed of anti-Semitism. This is historically untrue; one of the oldest Jewish settlements in the United States is the old Sephardic community in South Carolina, which has always been accepted and respected there.

    I remember several years ago, when National Review still published the e-mail addresses of its writers, I responded to an article by John Podhoretz in which he had characterized the "old Confederacy" as a "hotbed of anti-Semitism." I pointed out that Judah Benjamin had been a U.S. Senator before secession, and had occupied cabinet offices under the C.S.A., long before any Jew from the North held such positions under the Union; and that the most notorious act of anti-Semitism that took place during the War Between the States was Ulysses S. Grant's General Orders No. 11, providing that -

    "The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours of this order..."

    Grant's General Orders No. 11 is well known to any serious student of the War, and so eminent an historian as Bruce Catton observed that it "would leave a queer enduring stain on his [Grant's] own name."

    Despite this, Poddy, in a churlish fashion that I have since learnt is typical of him, replied with a rude and vulgar e-mail to the effect that I must be the sort of person who saved his Confederate money in the hope that the South would rise again.

    Such people are captives of their preferred narrative to such an extent that they dismiss well-documented evidence to the contrary and consider anyone who brings it up to be an enemy. I always had respect for Norman Podhoretz's intelligence, even though I disagreed with him - but his son appears (as Bill Kristol does in comparison with Irving) to be a textbook example of reversion to the mean.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Bruno says:

    The Christian faith seems to be an invention by Jews (Saint Paul) to destroy Roman and create a favourable mindset among barbarians. Universalism, individualism and shaming and guilt control is what can be hacked by ethnic interest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  42. mcohen says:
    @Israel Shamir

    tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Could be good explanation! Or perhaps they wanted to show they can do anything - from banning smoke to enforcing buggery. Now they attack Monsanto - surely evil company, but I'd say - it is not courts' business.

    Tobacco will be phased out because you cannot eat it.the land is needed to grow food.it is that simple.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Most weed’s been grown in grow houses, not outside for decades now. Now that weed’s legal taxed and certified, the profit will be less.

    But just 5o primo plants of high THC weed can bring a profit of $100,000 a year. The 99 legal medical marijuana plants can double the profit. It’s a lot of hard work but isn’t difficult to manage if you have a regular job. The electricity bill will be very high unless you have an electrician friend who will “adjust” the wiring for you. It’s also possible to mess with the water meter.

    The 99 legal medical plants can be grown in a 8 by 10 space even with the water light and electrical motors hooked up. The stripping and packaging can be done anywhere.

    If you don’t have a garage use a small bedroom next to a bathroom and do your own piping. You can save on electricity by building a just big enough box for the plants and grow lights If you are growing just a few plants for personal use all you need is a few pots, a grow light and you can manually water, fertilize and squirt pesticide in the bugs.

    I think the only people who grow weed outside are the illegal Mexicans who grow it in the national forests. But it’s vsry low quality because of lack of grow lights and bugs.

    Medical marijuana for pain is bogus. It really doesn’t break the contact between the site of the pain and the brain. Only the prescription pain killers do that. For lesser pain, aspirin Tylenol and muscle relaxers are as good or better as marijuana.

    The growers might do ok with legal marijuana. The certification, testing, and incredible taxes might, just might mean that no one will buy legal weed and just go on buying it from the illegal growers. Some liberal California politicians have proposed a 45 percent tax on legal weed.

    It’s probably possible to grow low THC hemp for paper cloth and things outside. But I really can’t see growing primo high THC weed outside.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @utu

    We thought that was a war against ‘old money’ and an iconic industry of America.
     
    It would be good to research who is behind marijuana industry.
    http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/why-do-we-underplay-the-links-between-cannabis-and-psychosis/#comment-2394885

    Did anybody here ever GO TO COLLEGE? Pot fries about half the people that use it? I was a pothead in college.

    Most people quit getting high everyday after they graduate from college. But we all know those guys that dropped out and drifted to Washington state and live in a tree somewhere.

    Some people are wasted as bad on pot as they would be on any other drug-and I was toking in the 90′s on common-or-garden pot.

    Many smokers are successful people. Not now, because less people smoke in general, but tobacco does not turn a person into schizophrenia. Psychoactive drugs do that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    You mean to say that “fewer” people smoke nowadays. As to marijuana, however, I doubt that’s true in the USA.

    In any event, I know that my psychological and emotional issues have nothing to do with pot. I have plenty of people who will testify that I was this messed up before I ever smoked ;)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. anon[317] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough
    However, they [Jews] couldn’t and didn’t take over the Russian state

    Others see it differently:

    ‘According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 566 important functionaries of the Bolshevik state in 1918-1919 there were 17 Russians … and 457 Jews.’—Appendix D to Robert Wilton’s The Last Days of the Romanovs

    ‘…the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish.’—President Putin, reported in The Times of Israel

    ‘[I M] Bikerman wrote with evident concern in 1923 that “the Jew is in all corners and on all levels of power. … The Russian sees him as a ruler of Moscow, at the head of the capital on Neva [Leningrad], and at the head of the Red Army, a perfected death machine. … The Russian sees the Jew as judge and hangman; he sees Jews at every turn, not only among the communists, but among people like himself, everywhere doing the bidding of Soviet power.”’—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Two Hundred Years Together, Chapter 18

    Yes Mr. Israel Shamir, but why did these mass migrations take place?

    Track backward from the Jewish domination of previous Irish NY and the Russian Jewish Red October to Salonika, Ottoman Empire where the Ottoman hosted the Jewish traders and bankers, since Spanish, 1392 and Portuguese expulsion 1401) . I have been trying to track Portuguese and Spanish Jewish back to the 1250(?), British expulsion of the Jews) where did that come from, decendants of the same booted from Britain (1250?) group??…
    The attempt (CUP) to overthrow their Ottoman Host, failed, three million migrated by 1910 in either to NY, USA or to St. Petersburg, Russia? The coup attempt was a direct result of the 1896, Hertzl Zionist Congress Group, mostly German, French and British Bankers and Traders. Many of these migrants replaced the officers and administrators of the Russian Government (during the fighting days of the revolution, a neat way to make the coup successful, and were the Russian migrant half of the 3 million that sent letters to the USA president encouraging American intervention in WWI, Its all part of the bankersters and Jewish traders (corporations) and a global network that works like an octopus. The Story of the East Indies companies is illuminating ( a corporation became British and Indian government as far as India was concerned).

    This story has not yet been fully explained in my opinion. Some of this story is hazy, but I believe its there?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. mcohen says:
    @Israel Shamir

    tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Could be good explanation! Or perhaps they wanted to show they can do anything - from banning smoke to enforcing buggery. Now they attack Monsanto - surely evil company, but I'd say - it is not courts' business.

    Israel shamir says

    “So indeed there is a great need to bring democracy to the US by restoring President’s constitutional powers and by severely curbing unconstitutional Jewish powers. And fine articles by Ron Unz could be a great start for this road to real American independence.”

    You have it the wrong way round.this has nothing to do with trump or democracy.it is simply a line in the sand of what defines a jewish person.

    Fake news and fake jews gimme the blues

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    “For the sake of the Jews, we may be required to stop being so Jewish. For the sake of saving our necks... for it is time we cease pretending we are about others and start moving to the top where we belong - not only, of course, for our own sakes but for the sake of an embattled Western world and a vulnerable Jewish folk.”
    “Judaism teaches first and foremost: “If I am not for myself, who will be?” (If we are not for ourselves, who will be?) Judaism requires of us that we forsake any pseudo-ideals that obscure our self-interests . What our former masters may not know is that though we look very different, we are as proudly Jewish as any previous generation. We are not only a fifth column in the corporate world but also heirs of the Rothschilds and Warburgs: We are where we belong, at last. “
    “The prophets had addressed the Jews about their communal obligations and failures, seeking to make them better Jews, not just fine people-in-general.”
    “Gloriously alive and involved, profligately scattering sparks of true being, he is that utter rarity: a person and Jew as one, and no less real in either aspect for being so much the other.”
    Rabbi Heschel has said: “There is a price to be paid by the Jews; in order to be a man he has to be more than a man; in order to be a people, we have to be more than a people.”
    What Israel needs desperately is our concern for its soul. What we need so desperately is an Israel that is unafraid to dissent with itself. We do not need Israel to be more macho than we or more Jewish than we or to win wars because we often lose. We need Israel to be a Zionist, Jewish state. This...is not the “instant Zionism” of Norman Podhoretz (Commentary), which cannot abide criticism...but a Zionism which grew out of a world of dissent. Where are the successors of Haim Greenberg, Stephen Wise, Louis Marshall, and Abraham Heschel? If there is none, it is because there is no audience worthy of them, because we have contemned our heritage of dissent and nonconformity.
    “Ahavat Yisrael - loving other Jews - means the willingness to share even those problems that cannot be solves, to respect fellow Jews...It means remembering what halbanat panim - the prohibition of publicly shaming others - is. And it means remembering that all Jews are brothers and sisters and must treat each other that way....”
    “What is at stake here is democratic Jewish life in American and Israel, and God willing, all over the world.
    What is at stake here is the real power of the Jewish religion to compel and constrain and refute but also to permit and expand and instruct. What is at stake here is the vitality and moral ygiene of the Jewish people. If Israel fails, we die, but if we fail because we tried to be more McCarthyite than McCarthy, then Israel dies too. I believe that God will protect Israel; God will protect Israel with our help. But we must keep the Torah for Him, and we can do that only by treating each other with respect.”
    UNFINISHED RABBI Selected Writings of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Chicago 1998
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. The fact is that Zionist bankers in New York and every European country were the ones who furnished the money to overthrow the Russian government and Zionist Bolsheviks were in the overwhelming majority of the communists that ruled Russia and murdered some 60 million Russians in the years from 1917 to 1957.

    The attempt to mislead about the zionists who tool over Russia and murdered some 60 million is in itself a crime and anyone who has read Alexander Solzhenitsyns Gulag Archipelago and Robert Conquests Harvest of Sorrow knows the truth about the zionist bolshevik butchers that destr0yed a christian nation for their satanic bolshevik communist ideolgy.

    This is the same mindset that is behind the creation of terrorists like ISIS aka AL CIADA and all of its off shoots which in fact are a creation of the zionist controlled U.S. gov and ISRAEL and BRITAIN with help from zionist controlled FRANCE and NATO and the SAUDIS.

    Proof of this is the fact that Israel and the zionist controlled deep state did 911 and murdered 3000 Americans and got away with it, and it is also a fact that the communist style destruction of America is being done by the same type of zionist bolsheviks that destroyed Russia.

    Those who doubt this, just read the 10 planks of the communist manifesto and see how far down the road to communism and the destruction of America we have come.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. @Anon
    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.

    American communism was a Jewish affair from its founding by Russian immigrants in 1918 until 1930.

    In 1930 Stalin realized that a communist party consisting of foreigners who didn’t speak English concentrate. In NYC wouldn’t win many converts

    So Stalin made 4 decrees for the CPUSA

    1 40 percent Jewish quota for the CPUSA

    2 move headquarters to Chicago

    3 official language to be English and only English spoken among members

    4 head of the party not Jewish hence Gene Dennis and Gus Hall

    Maybe in Russia communism wasn’t a totally Jewish affair, but it certainly was in America.

    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.

    Again, this is precisely my point–Dr. MacDonald cannot possibly make any sound judgements on “Jewish influence” on Russian “communism” precisely for the reasons of Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific. In other words: wind doesn’t blow because crowns of trees are moving, it is the other way around. But then again, generally Western “humanities” and policy fields have issues with causalities–the empirical evidence of this is overwhelming. This is one of the major reasons why the US finds herself where it is and why her decline continues and, in fact, accelerates.

    Read More
    • Agree: FB
    • Replies: @Mike P

    ... the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US ... turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific
     
    I think that holds for a lot of countries, not just Russia (and not just in American academia).
    , @renfro

    Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you.
     
    You are evidently reading the wrong American books or getting your opinion on this from what you see on blogs.
    I had to go dig out my old university world history book to check. What it says basically is the bad outcome of the Russia-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. And that by 1914 after Nicholas led his country into another war discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, and soldiers and the populace became war-weary.
    What kicked off the Revolution and caused Czar Nicholas to abdicate was the army joining striking workers demanding relief and reforms.

    So are you saying this is not accurate?

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s. So you have to depend on sources by people that may or may not have been on the ground during those past times or either may have their own basis. However I don't see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds. Being Russian does not make you a historian on Russia. 5 years in the Soviet Coast Guard and now living in America also does not make you a Russian military expert. So if you have more and other qualifications list them and we might consider you more of an authority and tolerate your insults better.

    Andrei Martyanov
    Mr. Martyanov is a graduate of Caspian (Kirov) Naval Academy, class of 1985. Upon graduation he served on ships of the Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He currently resides in the United States

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Fidelios Automata
    Interesting that Shamir mentions the anti-tobacco jihad of recent years. We all know smoking is bad for one's health, but I've long had the impression (perhaps because I'm an ornery libertarian) that tobacco is being demonized out of proportion to its actual harm to society, while problems like prescription drug abuse get minimized. I've often speculated that it's because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    that it’s because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.

    Very well could be. I am a former smoker–smoked for 20 years. Yet, I was outraged when a-holes forbade smoking in the bars. I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one. Hell, this is why bars were created.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Aramis Kretzer

    I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one.
     
    That is amusing. Good of you to speak for all citizens who patronize bars and restaurants. One option, apparently rejected by legislature, would have been to require "Smoking Permitted" (Or "Smoke If You Got 'Em") signs at bar and restaurant entries.

    While I, personally, believe the bad effects of tobacco are in ample evidence, and proscription justified throughout, still ... leave it to the self-destructive impulses of the user, and those who would benefit from the bad habits of others.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @Israel Shamir
    Stalin

    ended Jewish dominance of the Communist party
     
    ?
    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way (his one Jewish ancestor had been received into Church), not more than he was a German, a Swede, a Kalmyk, and ethnic Russian. Trotsky was so non-Jewish, he didn't even understand Yiddisch. Stalin used to say that parting with Mensheviks had an effect of a pogrom, as the party had got rid of Jews.
    Stalin rolled back Jewish positions in the Party and in the state down to normal, still much more than by their share in population, but not like in the US. Stalin was ok with good loyal Jews. Kaganovich remained loyal to Stalin till the end of his days.

    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way

    In fact, his lineage was that of low-level nobility which absolutely precludes him being Jewish since Jews were verboten from any noble titles in Russia. Simple as that. Moreover, I am always fascinated by the fact of total disregard of, say, Maxim Gorky’s (Peshkov) immense ideological influence and role in Russian Marxism, together with Savva Morozov’s support of revolutionary movement.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    There were a number of Jews, several thousands, who were ennobled as Jews (without pretending to convert) in the Russian Empire. The Russian Empire, was not, contrary to Zionist propaganda, "anti-Semitic." (Without Anti-Semitism there can be no Zionism, obviously, so it was invented, and planted by hired Journalists and through Psy-Ops like the Dreyfus affair and other such things.) This ennobling of ethnic and religious Jews was part of the normal imperial policy, just as there were Tatar Moslem nobles, Yusupov was one, and Lamaist Buddhist nobles, and Lutheran nobles and Catholic nobles. When you take people into the Empire, you make some of them nobles, particularly if they were important in their community before. This is normal in all empires.

    Lenin's Grandfather Alexander Dimitrievich Blank (originally Israel or "Shrul" Moiseyevich Blank, he took the patronym Dimitrievich from his patron, Moiseyevich obviously would not do) had "converted" first to Lutheranism (his first papers said "converted" from Judaism) and then to Orthodoxy (so that the final civil ID papers said that he "converted" to Orthodoxy from Lutheranism). This was a common procedure for a certain type of person who was converting with ulterior motives. What does the Psalm say? "By way of deception you will make your war." Lenin's Great Grandfather Moisey Blank, or, Weiss, or Beliy, or "White" from Turkic Ak, which signified the Khazar religious noble caste (established in Lithuania when they moved there from Crimea in 1391), converted at an old age when his wife died. He wrote to the Tsar Nikolai I in 1835 to say he held off from converting earlier because she was religious and he humored her. Why was he writing to the Tsar in Yiddish? Maybe because he was a secret agent. Wasn't Stalin originally a secret agent? (Speaking of names, Kara, which is "Black" or Schwar(t)z in Turkic denoted a Khazar military noble caste, while Kizl, that is, Red or, in Yiddish "Roth" signified a particular Shamanistic function. "Blue" or Blau, "Yellow" or Gelb, also have their Turkic meanings.)

    Marx "converted" to Lutheranism. Disraeli converted to Anglicanism. He wrote in the novel Coningsby that this had no harmful effects. Actually it had no effect at all, and he recommended it to all Jews. It made no difference at all! Do you think these conversions had any effect upon them whatsoever? Would they have any effect upon you? The Waves of conversions starting in in 1759 and 1772 were due to Jacob Frank, the successor follower of Shabbatai Zevi, the Spanish Jewish Antichrist in Turkey who converted to Islam in Constantinople in 1665. Those thousands who converted with Shabbatai Zevi in Turkey are the Doenmeh, who overthrew the Sultan and ran Turkey from 1908 until recently. Louis Brandeis was a Frankist. He did not convert but he kept an icon that his mother gave him of Jacob Frank's daughter who was the female divinity in Frankism, the Shekinah. The Hassids also come from Shabbatai Zevi, but every Hassid group has its own divinity in their dynasty. Plenty to go around and more Hassid groups are being started all the time. And there are also pure Shabbatians, very few know who they are, unless they do something like make Jewish blessings on Shabbat over Shellfish while pretending to be Buddhists.

    Jacob Frank himself first converted to Islam and then converted to Catholicism (twice in two months. The second time in 1759 at the hand of the King of Poland). And 25,000 Jews converted with him and were ennobled by the Poles, and adopted in their families. That explains a great deal, doesn't it? Jacob Frank then offered to the Russians to convert himself and his followers to Russian Orthodoxy. He did not do it, but many did. And now some do nothing but pretend anyway. See: "The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement, 1755-1816" by Pavel Maciejko.

    Madeleine Albright's parents converted to Catholicism, and she says she is an Episcopalian. She says she did not know that her parents converted. She only read it in the newspapers but, she said that finally explains to her why her cousins are Jewish. She always wondered. Does she strike you as a pukka Christian? Moses Maimonides converted to Islam in Fez. Then in Egypt he said, "Just kidding." Some Jews have pretended to be Catholics for five hundred years. And then they suddenly discover they are... Jews. Happens all the time. They are called Marranos. Often with the name Cruz, Bonfante (or Belafonte) or Sottomayor, or Castro. In fact, when you get down to it, the Caribbean is mostly Marrano, even as far as Texas and New Mexico. An Israeli Court recently declared the Chuetas of Majorca to be Jews after five hundred years as being accepted as Catholics. They said they were Catholics but they only married among themselves, so... This can only be done if you only strictly marry among other Crypto Jews of course; if you marry outside, you blew it. It is considered to be a genetic thing by the Jews, some kind of holy seed business. But it is really a state of mind. Once its fundamental principles take over, namely "nothing is true, everything is permitted," once this essential condition takes over the mind, it is very, very hard to change it. You can convert all you want. But very, very few can escape. You have received the mark of Cain.

    Lenin was not a "believing" Jew. How many Jews are believing? But he had a monkey on his back. You know that atheist Jews are the majority, and there are many, many more Jews than the official numbers. Nor were Lenin's sisters believing Jews. But they believed they were Jews. One of Lenin's sisters wrote to Stalin that it was time to declare to the world that Lenin was a Jew. It is in the archives. So the family thought they were Jews, even if you don't think so. Trotsky certainly was also not a believing Jew. But he was a Jew nonetheless. You don't have to speak Yiddish. Many Jews even honestly believe that they are not Jews. But they are Jews none the less. For example, if they believe in reincarnation. That is a giveaway.

    There is a lot of make believe in life. Have you noticed? Max Nordau said there are no British Jews, American Jews, or French Jews. There are only Jews who happen to live in America, in Britain, or France. This is elementary.
    , @Anon
    Lenin’s lineage wasn’t low level nobility. His father got the title when he was promoted to chief of the school department of an entire province.

    That was the Russian custom. It was a perk for civil servants who were promoted to a certain level. Given that one son was hanged for revolutionary activities and Lenin was in exile most of his adult life his children didn’t inherit the title.

    It’s interesting that the revolution began in the 1860s among the newly established university professors and students as well as the teachers mostly women in the newly established state elementary and secondary school system. One of the covers used by the revolutionaries was the monthly elementary teachers meetings. That was where they met to discuss tactics and strategies and make their plans.

    The murderers of Czar Alexander all came out of the universities.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Respect says:

    I have young patients with their brain functions diminished and symptoms like academic failure
    , anxiety , depresion , paranoia , psychosis etc….. who tell me that that they have very healthy habits because they don`t smoke tobaco , or drink alcohol . They recognise to smoke marihuna but they insist that marihuana is healthy and they reject that their symptoms can be produced by marihuana .

    The marketting of the drug dealers is excellent .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  51. Looks like Zionist Globalist Jews are singing “Its now or never…..”
    They are now attacking even Catholic church. ( Proverbial kitchen sink)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  52. Israel, just paid attention to this in your tweet:

    Восстановили Рабиновича в партии))

    Cannot stop laughing, LOL!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. @Israel Shamir
    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin's words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.

    “By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power,” As Ron Unz pointed, 3 out of 5 of the contenders for leadership of the USSR after Lenin’s death were Jewish. If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom. As it happened, the Gentile Stalin took power. But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom
     
    And if the grandma had testicles, she would have been a grandpa. Have it ever occurred to anyone to ask a simple question--but WHY did Stalin win?

    But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.
     
    Yes, like sending Polina Zhemchuzhina into the labor camp in 1948 for proposing Crimea to be given to Jews. FYI, she was a wife of Vyacheslav Molotov, whose grandson--Vyacheslav Nikonov is an influential State Duma MP and, quite frankly, strong and consistent Russian nationalist. And I mean not some fringe "nationalist".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. AaronB says:

    Israel Shamir, you are focusing on a political solution to a spiritual problem, like all the stupid materialist whites.

    If I was conspiracy minded, I’d say you’re trying to deflect whites attention from what’s wrong with them and focus on useless political issues instead :)

    White intellectuals create despair and apathy in their own people. Guys like James Thompson tell whites striving is useless and their fate is set in stone (genes), surrendering the field to Jews who know better. Guys like Steve Sailer tell whites pretty much the same thing. But these guys are low level people.

    Meanwhile, the spiritual and intellectual white elite are all Leftist – men and women of idealism, character, and high intelligence who see white culture as a desert of materialism and science and who turn to Jews as the only source of idealism they see around them, however twisted.

    A typical alt-right thought leader is a guy like Vox Day – who is of average intellect and low character.

    But these guys don’t matter so much – what whites need to do is win back the high quality people whites, who are all Leftist, and convert them to their side.

    But as long as “white” culture stands for capitalism, science, materialism, and the like – high quality whites will continue joining the Left, however twisted and perverted it is.

    Read More
    • Disagree: Vojkan
    • Replies: @Vojkan
    "High quality" whites don't join the Left, the Left co-opts them. To be co-opted by the Left, you have to embrace its moral relativism and its dogmas. Being dogmatic is not what I consider being spiritual. Trying to win back "Leftist" whites is like trying to convince islamic radicals. Contradict any of their dogmas and you're immediately labeled a fascist. Any debate with a Leftist inevitably sooner or later reaches the Godwin point and you have the n-word thrown at you.
    I don't want to win any of those folks back. The fight is not about capitalism, science, or materialism. The foundation of modern leftism is Marxism and Marxism is materialist at its core. Marxist dialectical materialism is applied Hegelian dialectic idealism, it's what applied mathematics are to theoretical mathematics.
    The fight is not there. The fight is for the younger generations and in preventing their indoctrination by the Left. That cannot be achieved by trying to prove that the Left is wrong, but by exposing ideas that are Right. And I really don't care for the colour of skin, those ideas have to be equally appealing to whites and non-whites. This is not a racial fight, it is a fight for all human civilisations in all their real diversity as they have been built for thousands of years against a band of lunatics who want to end them and create a "new" Mankind. It is a fight for roots against spiritless globalism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @Jon Halpenny
    "By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power," As Ron Unz pointed, 3 out of 5 of the contenders for leadership of the USSR after Lenin's death were Jewish. If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom. As it happened, the Gentile Stalin took power. But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.

    If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom

    And if the grandma had testicles, she would have been a grandpa. Have it ever occurred to anyone to ask a simple question–but WHY did Stalin win?

    But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.

    Yes, like sending Polina Zhemchuzhina into the labor camp in 1948 for proposing Crimea to be given to Jews. FYI, she was a wife of Vyacheslav Molotov, whose grandson–Vyacheslav Nikonov is an influential State Duma MP and, quite frankly, strong and consistent Russian nationalist. And I mean not some fringe “nationalist”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jon Halpenny
    I would estimate Jews came close twice in 20th Century to a takeover of USSR/Russia. The first time was after the death of Lenin but ultimately they lost to Gentile Stalin. The second time was in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. nsa says:

    Patrick Quillin treated over 5000 cancer patients and observed that he never witnessed a recovery by a smoker. Not one….they all died……poisoned from the inside out. Only a pompous blowhard like Izzie Shamir could justify a stupid activity like smoking because a few vile jooie shysters made a buck going after the tobacco companies. Is anyone else tired of foreigners like Izzie carrying their obscure crappy old world disputes over here to the new world? And his prose is terrible…….needs a course in remedial English at some junior college.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Not one….they all died……
     
    Just last Fall we bid farewell to one of our dearest friends in the US, almost a relative by all metrics. She was 82, she smoked all her life prior to the event. In 1996 she had operation on her lung--cancer. 2017-1996=21 years. So, this is one already. This makes your, most likely BS statistics, flawed. But it is just me with my single anecdotal evidence. So one did recover, after all.
    , @Anonymous
    I'm not sure what you mean by "treatment" . As Patrick Quillin is a nutritionist and not a medical doctor it is unsurprising that his "patients" did poorly. Especially on some fad diet designed to sell books. They probably would have been better off praying for a cure like Jobs.
    , @Anonymous
    I personally know two people who survived tobacco-induced lung cancer, and I'm not even a doctor.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Che Guava says:

    As usual, an article worth the time to read.

    together rule the US, just like the Jews did in the Biblical times.

    Does this mean that you believe in the Book of Mormon?

    AFAIK, they are the only people claiming that what is now Nth. America was ruled by Jews

    in the Biblical times.

    Can’t help it, your phrasing is begging for it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. @nsa
    Patrick Quillin treated over 5000 cancer patients and observed that he never witnessed a recovery by a smoker. Not one....they all died......poisoned from the inside out. Only a pompous blowhard like Izzie Shamir could justify a stupid activity like smoking because a few vile jooie shysters made a buck going after the tobacco companies. Is anyone else tired of foreigners like Izzie carrying their obscure crappy old world disputes over here to the new world? And his prose is terrible.......needs a course in remedial English at some junior college.

    Not one….they all died……

    Just last Fall we bid farewell to one of our dearest friends in the US, almost a relative by all metrics. She was 82, she smoked all her life prior to the event. In 1996 she had operation on her lung–cancer. 2017-1996=21 years. So, this is one already. This makes your, most likely BS statistics, flawed. But it is just me with my single anecdotal evidence. So one did recover, after all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    How much of her lungs were removed and what was the rate of oxygen that she needed afterwards to stay alive? Did she enjoy life or was it like Ariel Sharon on life support for a few years? Did she go on smoking?
    , @ploni almoni
    Some people survive shooting a bullet in their head. So much for bull shit statistics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Respect says:

    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia , for Stalin , for life and honor , against the miserable invaders from Germany , Austria Hungary , Rumania , Italy , Eslovaquia , Croacia , Finland , Baltics …..

    The western mind ,spetially the anglo and german mind , is so ” sophisticated ” , that`s to say so deformed by propaganda , by overschooling , and by their own catathimia , that no longer is able to formulate simple , creative , questions and extract the logic consecuences . Like the one you propose Why Stalin won ? , obviously he won because the Russians did not desert Stalin and fought like lions , with great suffering , obviously because the russians backed Stalin …. and still back him and love him .

    ( too complicated for western idiots , since most of the westeners are unable to ask themselves that simple question Why Stalin won ? , and extract the logic consecuences )

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia
     
    Very true but the question was not about WW II, albeit this is too very relevant. The Polichinelle Secret is that Stalin after the death of Lenin, being effectively in charge of Party cadres started to promote people from the "bottom", primarily workers and peasants, to the local and mid-rank Party positions. Needless to say that those cadres were overwhelmingly Slavic and they were loyal to Stalin. In terms of Party proceedings it gave him an enormous leverage since he always could get votes of delegates when he needed. So, "Jews" were doomed from the start--can you believe it, an Orthodox Seminary dropout outmaneuvered and outsmarted all those (I am sure very high IQ) Jews. This is how NEP was stopped and industrialization and collectivization started. This is also how major Soviet social lifts began to function for which overwhelming majority of Russian people fought to the death in WW II since, especially, generation born late-19th-early 20th century could still vividly recall what life was before 1917. Obviously most "Russian" so called scholars in the West have no clue that Revolution of 1905 was in effect the largest peasant uprising in the Russian history and what happened to Russian populace after it was suppressed. Russia was literally "Porota" that is mass-whipped, village after village. This is about those who lived. Paradoxically, these were SRs, many of them Jewish who decidedly refused to take the power which was literally dropping into their hands then for a purely doctrinal reasons--they thought that industrial capitalism in Russia was not developed well enough to provide conditions for socialist revolution. Bolsheviks WILL NOT make this mistake in 1917 and Russian peasantry followed them.
    , @jacques sheete
    I don't pretend to know why Stalin "won, " but to the extent that he did, part of the answer is that he knew how to play the pompous, ignorant, stupid uber-assholes like FDR and Churchill like the fools they were.

    For that and his elimination of Old Bolshies I give him high grades.
    , @Wally
    Except the German 'invaders' were forced to 'invade'.

    I suggest a less Zionist manipulated view of WWII for you.

    Operation Barbarossa Was A Preventive Attack: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7999
    and:
    Introduction to HITLER'S WAR: http://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/

    The Communists 'won' because they had vast material support from 'the Allies'.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Sparkon says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    A review by Kevin MacDonald
     
    Kevin MacDonald is NOT a "scholar" of Russian Revolution (there were THREE of them between 1905 and October 1917) because he is not a scholar of Russian peasantry and warfare. US historiography is remarkably sterile whenever the only issue which matters--war and a conflict--comes up, since overwhelming majority of these scholars have no clue on the nature and application of military power. They also have no grasp of scale of the 20th century warfare and conflict in general. Israel Shamir is spot on when states that Jews were out of power in USSR by 1930s. They were flushed out, together with Civil War leftover nutjobbery. Jews are a popular and necessary topic to discuss but general Western ignorance on Russian peasantry would be comical, if not for it being so damaging to the, otherwise pathetically inadequate American "Russian Studies" field. Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.

    Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.

    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in “the future world war” already by 1903?

    In that speech before a packed house of Parisian Jews, Nordau explained how the English offer of Uganda to the Jews for their homeland was just a step on the ladder to a world war leading to the establishment of a Jewish state:

    …let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.

    Henry Ford, The International Jew, Chapter 14, Did the Jews Foresee the World War?

    http://www.unz.com/book/henry_ford__the-international-jew/

    For Nordau to speak so confidently and indeed accurately in 1903 of momentous events a decade or more in the future — including a bloody world war — underlines the fact that this plan must have been in motion already for some time well before Nordau’s speech.

    The other part of the bargain, of course, was that Germany would be crushed — not once, but twice — while millions upon millions of Russians and Europeans died in the orgies of blood, and all of it just so the Jews could have Palestine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in “the future world war” already by 1903?
     
    Have you ever tried to read not just Zionists or about Zionists? Truck load of intellectuals ranging from non-Jewish conservatives to Marxists felt the approach of the war. Hell, after reading Househofer, Mahan or Mackinder and what Imperialism looked like even people with an average IQ kinda can get the idea that a big brawl was just the matter of when, not if.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @Respect
    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia , for Stalin , for life and honor , against the miserable invaders from Germany , Austria Hungary , Rumania , Italy , Eslovaquia , Croacia , Finland , Baltics .....

    The western mind ,spetially the anglo and german mind , is so " sophisticated " , that`s to say so deformed by propaganda , by overschooling , and by their own catathimia , that no longer is able to formulate simple , creative , questions and extract the logic consecuences . Like the one you propose Why Stalin won ? , obviously he won because the Russians did not desert Stalin and fought like lions , with great suffering , obviously because the russians backed Stalin .... and still back him and love him .

    ( too complicated for western idiots , since most of the westeners are unable to ask themselves that simple question Why Stalin won ? , and extract the logic consecuences )

    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia

    Very true but the question was not about WW II, albeit this is too very relevant. The Polichinelle Secret is that Stalin after the death of Lenin, being effectively in charge of Party cadres started to promote people from the “bottom”, primarily workers and peasants, to the local and mid-rank Party positions. Needless to say that those cadres were overwhelmingly Slavic and they were loyal to Stalin. In terms of Party proceedings it gave him an enormous leverage since he always could get votes of delegates when he needed. So, “Jews” were doomed from the start–can you believe it, an Orthodox Seminary dropout outmaneuvered and outsmarted all those (I am sure very high IQ) Jews. This is how NEP was stopped and industrialization and collectivization started. This is also how major Soviet social lifts began to function for which overwhelming majority of Russian people fought to the death in WW II since, especially, generation born late-19th-early 20th century could still vividly recall what life was before 1917. Obviously most “Russian” so called scholars in the West have no clue that Revolution of 1905 was in effect the largest peasant uprising in the Russian history and what happened to Russian populace after it was suppressed. Russia was literally “Porota” that is mass-whipped, village after village. This is about those who lived. Paradoxically, these were SRs, many of them Jewish who decidedly refused to take the power which was literally dropping into their hands then for a purely doctrinal reasons–they thought that industrial capitalism in Russia was not developed well enough to provide conditions for socialist revolution. Bolsheviks WILL NOT make this mistake in 1917 and Russian peasantry followed them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hunsdon
    Andrei, could you recommend one or two good English text sources for interested students of Russian 20th century history? While I can read Russian it is much easier for me to digest complicated texts in my native tongue, English. I thank you in advance for any assistance you can render in this
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Mike P says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.
     
    Again, this is precisely my point--Dr. MacDonald cannot possibly make any sound judgements on "Jewish influence" on Russian "communism" precisely for the reasons of Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called "Russia Studies" field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia's 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific. In other words: wind doesn't blow because crowns of trees are moving, it is the other way around. But then again, generally Western "humanities" and policy fields have issues with causalities--the empirical evidence of this is overwhelming. This is one of the major reasons why the US finds herself where it is and why her decline continues and, in fact, accelerates.

    … the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US … turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific

    I think that holds for a lot of countries, not just Russia (and not just in American academia).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    I think that holds for a lot of countries, not just Russia
     
    Russia occupies a very special place in Western post-WW II academia in general, and US "scholars" in particular. I will add--especially among US "scholars".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. FB says:

    What a load of crap…

    Here’s a news flash for most of the ‘writers’ on this website, including Mr. Unz…the vast majority of normal people everywhere care not one whit about ‘the Jews’…

    The constant stream of ‘Jewish Supremacy’ articles on this website makes one think that the authors take a perverse delight in this supposed ‘mastery’ of the ‘Jewish race’…

    In reality no such ‘mastery’ exists…with the possible exception of Smellywood…and even here we see that the agenda that infuses the propaganda comes from the Deep State, not some ‘Jewishness’…

    In short…just about everything here on this website is much ado about nothing…yes some small portion of the American Jewish population have done very well in the United States and punch far above their weight in many important spheres, especially finance, foreign policy and the so-called ‘culture’ [which is anything but in reality]…although most of the Jewish population is in fact quite ordinary, both in terms of wealth and social status…

    The Greeks similarly had a disproportionate influence in Rome…and eventually ruled it for 1,000 years…the so-called ‘Eastern’ Roman empire…which was not actually called such in its own time [simply Rome]…and the name ‘Byzantium’ was invented in the 17′th century and was completely unheard of in Roman times…

    Maybe ‘the Jews’ will eventually rule what is left of the United States empire too…but there will not be much left to rule over..since that empire is fading quickly into irrelevance…The Brics countries already account for over 40 percent of the world economy and there is no viable path back in time…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. Anon[973] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50033.htm

    I appreciate David Rothkopf’s critical stance on Israel but I find this disingenuous.

    The passage of the nation-state law attacks and effectively demolishes every reason for supporting the state of Israel that once existed for many American Jews and for an increasing number of Americans. It puts the lie to the idea that Israel is a democracy by denying full-privileges of citizenship to long-time residents within the borders Israel controls. It creates an apartheid society in which ethnic identity trumps fundamental human rights. Hardest still for many American Jews, it flies in the face of cherished Jewish values and the lessons of Jewish history – so much so that it makes Israel in many respects, an un-Jewish state…
    Indeed, the decision of the Israeli government to join with ethno-nationalists worldwide, including those in the Trump administration, makes the country part of one of the most dangerous movements afoot on the planet today – and also now, damagingly, foolishly, a partisan player in U.S. politics.

    What? Israel was founded as an ethno-national state from the beginning. Unlike whites in South Africa, Zionism was about Jews hiring Jewish workers. It necessitated the ethnic expulsion of Palestinians. It had Jewish Immigration Only policy. The recent laws only made more explicit what had always been the case in Israel.

    Also, it wasn’t ethno-nationalism that messed up the world. It was globo-imperialism. Ethno-nationalism is a reaction to globo-imperialism that invades and destroys nations and then steers refugees all over the world.

    After all, how nice for Palestinians if they could have maintained Palestine as their ethno-national state. Instead, they came under imperialist rule, and the British imperialists opened the way for Jewish migrant-invaders.

    As for Israel playing a role in US politics NOW, at whose behest did Bush and Obama smash the Middle East?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. @Andrei Martyanov

    If any of them had won, the USSR would be a totally Jewish fiefdom
     
    And if the grandma had testicles, she would have been a grandpa. Have it ever occurred to anyone to ask a simple question--but WHY did Stalin win?

    But he still permitted Jews to hold high positions provided they were loyal to him.
     
    Yes, like sending Polina Zhemchuzhina into the labor camp in 1948 for proposing Crimea to be given to Jews. FYI, she was a wife of Vyacheslav Molotov, whose grandson--Vyacheslav Nikonov is an influential State Duma MP and, quite frankly, strong and consistent Russian nationalist. And I mean not some fringe "nationalist".

    I would estimate Jews came close twice in 20th Century to a takeover of USSR/Russia. The first time was after the death of Lenin but ultimately they lost to Gentile Stalin. The second time was in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.
     
    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was "vykrestok", he was Russian Orthodox by religion. It was not so much to his, Gusinsky or any other Jewish oligarch's "smarts" as per Yeltsin being a mindless drunk animal who literally refused to govern, being most of the time incapacitated, that they exercised such a homicidal influence over Russia's fates in 1990s. But, but, having said all that--I recently read a tear-jerking interview of poor-poor dear Bobkov, a former KGB's 5th Directorate big honcho, Russian, who had no inhibitions of working for Gusinsky's criminal organization and when, in the end, he got shafted (deservedly so) he started to cry rivers on how all this was with good intentions and only with one thought of preserving Russia. Right, and I am an alien from planet Zoltar. While Jews did exercise such an influence, the role of the very many Russians who rose from the social recesses of the collapsing Soviet Union to the positions of power and money must not be overlooked--they loved it all along and laughed all the way to bank, that is those who have not been gunned down by criminal civil war which took place in Russia in 1992 on. But that is the separate, and way more important than Jewish influence, history of Russian "liberalism".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Mike P

    ... the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US ... turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific
     
    I think that holds for a lot of countries, not just Russia (and not just in American academia).

    I think that holds for a lot of countries, not just Russia

    Russia occupies a very special place in Western post-WW II academia in general, and US “scholars” in particular. I will add–especially among US “scholars”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Prester John
    It's not for nothing that the first of the seven articles in the US Constitution references the legislative branch--not the executive or judicial ("All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives"). The Founders knew what they were doing. They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a "democracy").

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain, I can’t see as how they have “abdicated” authority they had no intention of applying. They are scoundrels, plain and simple. Who expects scoundrels to carry out Constitutional responsibilities?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain...
     
    That's a brilliant summary which pretty well describes the constitutionalist motive for imposing that thing on the rest of us in the first place. The current parasite class is cut from material similar if not identical to those who advocated the thing from the beginning.
    , @Josecanuc
    “The knaves (scoundrels) are the cleaverest; they pretend they know it all, the fools believe them, so they govern.” John Edward Trewlyan, 1821
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.
     
    Yeah, right.

    Moreover, there is nothing wrong about taking money from wealthy Jews. I did it.

     

    The guy is still pure as freshly fallen snow, right? Psst, I have a ski resort in Florida that I'll let you have cheap. Cuz yer a special fella...
    , @Andrei Martyanov

    to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi
     
    The United States, unlike Russia, DOES have Jewish and Israeli influence problem. It is difficult to deny it after 26 standing ovations by the joint session of US Congress to Bibi. I cringed from disgust and I am Russian. So, I wouldn't call what Phil Giraldi does "tired". Another matter that, and Phil addresses it once in a while, Israeli influence issue must always be used in connection to Christian Zionist enablers of this atrocity and those, so called "Christians", are a very large strata of the American society. Their loyalty to Israel trumps that to the United States. It is impossible to ignore and it is revolting.
    , @Israel Shamir
    I, for one, always enjoy Giraldi and Sailer; and they have much bigger readership on this site. But thank you anyway!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Sparkon

    Imperial Russia lost millions upon millions of people in WW I, millions more were maimed, and that had very little to do with Jews.
     
    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in "the future world war" already by 1903?

    In that speech before a packed house of Parisian Jews, Nordau explained how the English offer of Uganda to the Jews for their homeland was just a step on the ladder to a world war leading to the establishment of a Jewish state:

    ...let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.
     
    Henry Ford, The International Jew, Chapter 14, Did the Jews Foresee the World War?

    http://www.unz.com/book/henry_ford__the-international-jew/

    For Nordau to speak so confidently and indeed accurately in 1903 of momentous events a decade or more in the future -- including a bloody world war -- underlines the fact that this plan must have been in motion already for some time well before Nordau's speech.

    The other part of the bargain, of course, was that Germany would be crushed -- not once, but twice -- while millions upon millions of Russians and Europeans died in the orgies of blood, and all of it just so the Jews could have Palestine.

    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in “the future world war” already by 1903?

    Have you ever tried to read not just Zionists or about Zionists? Truck load of intellectuals ranging from non-Jewish conservatives to Marxists felt the approach of the war. Hell, after reading Househofer, Mahan or Mackinder and what Imperialism looked like even people with an average IQ kinda can get the idea that a big brawl was just the matter of when, not if.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon
    That wasn't the point, but now that you've referred to this "truck load of intellectuals," predicting "a future world war," as Zionist co-founder Nordau did, would you mind providing a direct quotation or two from that truckload of intellectuals to support your argument?

    You stated that WWI had "very little to do with Jews."

    In response -- to contradict your claim -- I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Andrei Martyanov

    that it’s because tobacco is grown by evil white southerners.
     
    Very well could be. I am a former smoker--smoked for 20 years. Yet, I was outraged when a-holes forbade smoking in the bars. I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one. Hell, this is why bars were created.

    I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one.

    That is amusing. Good of you to speak for all citizens who patronize bars and restaurants. One option, apparently rejected by legislature, would have been to require “Smoking Permitted” (Or “Smoke If You Got ‘Em”) signs at bar and restaurant entries.

    While I, personally, believe the bad effects of tobacco are in ample evidence, and proscription justified throughout, still … leave it to the self-destructive impulses of the user, and those who would benefit from the bad habits of others.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    While I, personally, believe the bad effects of tobacco are in ample evidence
     
    Absolutely! That is why I quit smoking but you are absolutely correct here:

    leave it to the self-destructive impulses of the user, and those who would benefit from the bad habits of others.
     
    Damn right! I would freaking organize resistance group if they will decide to forbid Jack Daniels and good reasonably priced cigars;-)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Anon[973] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. bj says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the "white ethnics" they live elbow-to-asshole with (Irish, Italian, Polish, even Arab) in the Northern cities?

    Since the South is so far away compared to Irish-Catholics in Boston or Italians in Jersey?

    You are probably familiar with E Michael Jones’s work on ethnic cleansing of American cities, but for those not familiar here is one of his talks……

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    Whites are not cleansed from Manhattan or Brooklyn. Trump lives there.

    From Detroit? Yes, but that was partly economics. South Chicago? Yes. Miami? No.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Anonymous[209] • Disclaimer says:
    @nsa
    Patrick Quillin treated over 5000 cancer patients and observed that he never witnessed a recovery by a smoker. Not one....they all died......poisoned from the inside out. Only a pompous blowhard like Izzie Shamir could justify a stupid activity like smoking because a few vile jooie shysters made a buck going after the tobacco companies. Is anyone else tired of foreigners like Izzie carrying their obscure crappy old world disputes over here to the new world? And his prose is terrible.......needs a course in remedial English at some junior college.

    I’m not sure what you mean by “treatment” . As Patrick Quillin is a nutritionist and not a medical doctor it is unsurprising that his “patients” did poorly. Especially on some fad diet designed to sell books. They probably would have been better off praying for a cure like Jobs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Good article, but kindly consider correcting this oft repeated, but largely bogus claim.:

    the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948, a terrible crime on a par with Nazi persecution of Jews.

    Jews, in the form of International Commies, and international banksters criminally persecuted the German, Russian, and many other people for decades, and still do, and in many ways much worse than the supposed and undoubtedly grossly exaggerated claims of Jewish suffering.

    Our own “high IQ and “successful” Sam (The Divine) even claims that Jews thrive and flourish wherever they find themselves, and others, with much more authority and credibility, such as Douglas Reed and Freda Utley substantiate those claims.

    So, may I suggest that the concept you’re trying to communicate be stated,

    “… purported Nazi persecution of Jews”?

    Also, in that light, Zionist atrocities against the Palestinians is probably much worse than what Jews suffered in Germany.

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @bjondo
    In one year the Palestinians of Gaza, history's largest concentration-extermination-weapons-testing prison, and the Palestinians of the western prison suffer more than Yids have in 2500 years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Jeff77450 says:

    “Toynbee explained why Jews want mass migration from the Third World to Europe: in a European country populated by Somali, Afghan, Syrian etc communities, the Jews will become normalcy itself.” I see much potential for the Jews of Europe to come to regret this ploy. You can see it playing out in France right now. “Be careful what you wish for—because you just might get it.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @Aramis Kretzer

    I can tolerate second hand-smoke for an hour or two if need be in the bar, which is the perfect place to drink and to light one.
     
    That is amusing. Good of you to speak for all citizens who patronize bars and restaurants. One option, apparently rejected by legislature, would have been to require "Smoking Permitted" (Or "Smoke If You Got 'Em") signs at bar and restaurant entries.

    While I, personally, believe the bad effects of tobacco are in ample evidence, and proscription justified throughout, still ... leave it to the self-destructive impulses of the user, and those who would benefit from the bad habits of others.

    While I, personally, believe the bad effects of tobacco are in ample evidence

    Absolutely! That is why I quit smoking but you are absolutely correct here:

    leave it to the self-destructive impulses of the user, and those who would benefit from the bad habits of others.

    Damn right! I would freaking organize resistance group if they will decide to forbid Jack Daniels and good reasonably priced cigars;-)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Perhaps the first struggle of Jews for superiority was the fight against tobacco companies.

    What????

    You have to be kidding. First of all, certain individuals fight for superiority, not all Jews fight or fought for it.

    Second, there are a lot of examples demonstrating that some Jews were fighting for superiority prior to that. Does the name, “Rothschild” mean anything to you? What do you think Prohibition was all about? Have you ever read any of Josephus’ works? What do you think the world wars were about? The Zionist movement? (I’m talking real motives, not petexts.)

    Your attempted distortion of history is nauseating and pathetic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  78. @Prester John
    It's not for nothing that the first of the seven articles in the US Constitution references the legislative branch--not the executive or judicial ("All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives"). The Founders knew what they were doing. They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a "democracy").

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.

    The Founders knew what they were doing.

    Yes, they did, and it wasn’t purdy, at least from a freedom lovers point of view. In fact, the antifeds warned of what it would do, and in particular, some were none too happy with the power placed in the judiciary,as I recall.

    They had intended that REAL authority was to emanate from the citizenry through their representatives in the legislature acting within a republican form of government (not a “democracy”).

    You really must provide support for that contention otherwise it’s just an old myth, and a very silly one as well.

    The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d’état.

    It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)

    Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle

    mises.org/daily/4254

    Read it and be duped no more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Anon
    Ummm. The constitution gives authority to make laws to the congress, but President Madison caved in to judicial supremacy as early as 1804 Marbury vs Madison.

    Only 2 Presidents have refused to obey a Supreme Court order. President Jackson in the 1830s refused to obey a Supreme Court order to leave some of the tribal Cherokees on their Tennessee lands.

    President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1861, soon after he became President. A lawsuit was filed to overturn the presidential executive order. The Supreme Court ruled against Lincoln that the president does not have the authority to suspend habeas corpus.

    Lincoln ignored the Supreme Court order and kept more than 40,000 dissidents in prison until he died.

    The founders were elites. They wrote the constitution to ensure judicial supremacy by a Supreme Court that represented the elite. As early as possible, Marbury vs Madison established judicial supremacy in 1804.

    Rule by law suits and judges is nothing new n America. Look at gay marriage look at judicial orders about public bathrooms and trans gender freaks.

    Judges rule and have since 1804

    Great comments there!

    One tiny clarification, sorry.

    Judges rule and have since 1804

    Pretty close.

    They seem to function as agents for certain elements of the money bag crowd and they undoubtedly do as they are told, or else. I think they are tools of our rulers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Jon Halpenny
    I would estimate Jews came close twice in 20th Century to a takeover of USSR/Russia. The first time was after the death of Lenin but ultimately they lost to Gentile Stalin. The second time was in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.

    in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion. It was not so much to his, Gusinsky or any other Jewish oligarch’s “smarts” as per Yeltsin being a mindless drunk animal who literally refused to govern, being most of the time incapacitated, that they exercised such a homicidal influence over Russia’s fates in 1990s. But, but, having said all that–I recently read a tear-jerking interview of poor-poor dear Bobkov, a former KGB’s 5th Directorate big honcho, Russian, who had no inhibitions of working for Gusinsky’s criminal organization and when, in the end, he got shafted (deservedly so) he started to cry rivers on how all this was with good intentions and only with one thought of preserving Russia. Right, and I am an alien from planet Zoltar. While Jews did exercise such an influence, the role of the very many Russians who rose from the social recesses of the collapsing Soviet Union to the positions of power and money must not be overlooked–they loved it all along and laughed all the way to bank, that is those who have not been gunned down by criminal civil war which took place in Russia in 1992 on. But that is the separate, and way more important than Jewish influence, history of Russian “liberalism”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bjondo

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion
     
    From wikipedia:

    Boris Abramovich Berezovsky was born in 1946, in Moscow, to Abram Markovich Berezovsky (1911–1979),[28] a Jewish civil engineer in construction works,[29][30] and his wife, Anna Aleksandrovna Gelman (22 November 1923 – 3 September 2013).[31] Berezovsky always stressed his Jewish heritage, although by Orthodox Jewish law he was not Jewish, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish.

    Where else do you deceive?

    Maybe I have misread?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Respect
    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia , for Stalin , for life and honor , against the miserable invaders from Germany , Austria Hungary , Rumania , Italy , Eslovaquia , Croacia , Finland , Baltics .....

    The western mind ,spetially the anglo and german mind , is so " sophisticated " , that`s to say so deformed by propaganda , by overschooling , and by their own catathimia , that no longer is able to formulate simple , creative , questions and extract the logic consecuences . Like the one you propose Why Stalin won ? , obviously he won because the Russians did not desert Stalin and fought like lions , with great suffering , obviously because the russians backed Stalin .... and still back him and love him .

    ( too complicated for western idiots , since most of the westeners are unable to ask themselves that simple question Why Stalin won ? , and extract the logic consecuences )

    I don’t pretend to know why Stalin “won, ” but to the extent that he did, part of the answer is that he knew how to play the pompous, ignorant, stupid uber-assholes like FDR and Churchill like the fools they were.

    For that and his elimination of Old Bolshies I give him high grades.

    Read More
    • Agree: byrresheim
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @bj
    You are probably familiar with E Michael Jones's work on ethnic cleansing of American cities, but for those not familiar here is one of his talks......

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ow5wVv2FNs

    Whites are not cleansed from Manhattan or Brooklyn. Trump lives there.

    From Detroit? Yes, but that was partly economics. South Chicago? Yes. Miami? No.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Aramis Kretzer

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.
     
    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain, I can't see as how they have "abdicated" authority they had no intention of applying. They are scoundrels, plain and simple. Who expects scoundrels to carry out Constitutional responsibilities?

    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain…

    That’s a brilliant summary which pretty well describes the constitutionalist motive for imposing that thing on the rest of us in the first place. The current parasite class is cut from material similar if not identical to those who advocated the thing from the beginning.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @Aramis Kretzer
    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.

    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.

    Yeah, right.

    Moreover, there is nothing wrong about taking money from wealthy Jews. I did it.

    The guy is still pure as freshly fallen snow, right? Psst, I have a ski resort in Florida that I’ll let you have cheap. Cuz yer a special fella…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Aramis Kretzer

    The guy is still pure as freshly fallen snow, right? Psst, I have a ski resort in Florida that I’ll let you have cheap. Cuz yer a special fella…
     
    Shamir's opinion is basic, untrammeled by Giraldi's vendettas and Sailer's need-to-please his groupies.

    Disabuse yourself of any belief that your opinion of my opinion troubles me. Gripe about adolescent merde like that to your fellow adolescents. Don't waste my time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Jeff Stryker
    ...Look what they've done to all those Italian mechanics and construction workers on the Northeast Coast. Not to mention Irish-American bar-owners.

    Damn Jews really crushed those unions in the Northeast.

    Especially since they vote Democrat and these folks always try to bring up the minimum wage.

    You mean LATINO construction workers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. bjondo says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    in the 1990s when they had enormous influence over the government of Yeltsin.
     
    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was "vykrestok", he was Russian Orthodox by religion. It was not so much to his, Gusinsky or any other Jewish oligarch's "smarts" as per Yeltsin being a mindless drunk animal who literally refused to govern, being most of the time incapacitated, that they exercised such a homicidal influence over Russia's fates in 1990s. But, but, having said all that--I recently read a tear-jerking interview of poor-poor dear Bobkov, a former KGB's 5th Directorate big honcho, Russian, who had no inhibitions of working for Gusinsky's criminal organization and when, in the end, he got shafted (deservedly so) he started to cry rivers on how all this was with good intentions and only with one thought of preserving Russia. Right, and I am an alien from planet Zoltar. While Jews did exercise such an influence, the role of the very many Russians who rose from the social recesses of the collapsing Soviet Union to the positions of power and money must not be overlooked--they loved it all along and laughed all the way to bank, that is those who have not been gunned down by criminal civil war which took place in Russia in 1992 on. But that is the separate, and way more important than Jewish influence, history of Russian "liberalism".

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion

    From wikipedia:

    Boris Abramovich Berezovsky was born in 1946, in Moscow, to Abram Markovich Berezovsky (1911–1979),[28] a Jewish civil engineer in construction works,[29][30] and his wife, Anna Aleksandrovna Gelman (22 November 1923 – 3 September 2013).[31] Berezovsky always stressed his Jewish heritage, although by Orthodox Jewish law he was not Jewish, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish.

    Where else do you deceive?

    Maybe I have misread?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Where else do you deceive?
     
    So, you have no clue. Neither does Wiki, which in such issues is as reliable as Ford model T .

    https://www.yuga.ru/news/291046/

    Google Translate will help. Obviously you are also cut off Russian TV to know anything but Russian Orthodoxy and re-baptizing of Berezovsky was a huge issue in Russia when SOB was killed by British.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. bjondo says:
    @jacques sheete
    Good article, but kindly consider correcting this oft repeated, but largely bogus claim.:

    the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948, a terrible crime on a par with Nazi persecution of Jews.
     
    Jews, in the form of International Commies, and international banksters criminally persecuted the German, Russian, and many other people for decades, and still do, and in many ways much worse than the supposed and undoubtedly grossly exaggerated claims of Jewish suffering.

    Our own "high IQ and "successful" Sam (The Divine) even claims that Jews thrive and flourish wherever they find themselves, and others, with much more authority and credibility, such as Douglas Reed and Freda Utley substantiate those claims.

    So, may I suggest that the concept you're trying to communicate be stated,

    "... purported Nazi persecution of Jews"?

    Also, in that light, Zionist atrocities against the Palestinians is probably much worse than what Jews suffered in Germany.

    In one year the Palestinians of Gaza, history’s largest concentration-extermination-weapons-testing prison, and the Palestinians of the western prison suffer more than Yids have in 2500 years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Wally says:
    @Respect
    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia , for Stalin , for life and honor , against the miserable invaders from Germany , Austria Hungary , Rumania , Italy , Eslovaquia , Croacia , Finland , Baltics .....

    The western mind ,spetially the anglo and german mind , is so " sophisticated " , that`s to say so deformed by propaganda , by overschooling , and by their own catathimia , that no longer is able to formulate simple , creative , questions and extract the logic consecuences . Like the one you propose Why Stalin won ? , obviously he won because the Russians did not desert Stalin and fought like lions , with great suffering , obviously because the russians backed Stalin .... and still back him and love him .

    ( too complicated for western idiots , since most of the westeners are unable to ask themselves that simple question Why Stalin won ? , and extract the logic consecuences )

    Except the German ‘invaders’ were forced to ‘invade’.

    I suggest a less Zionist manipulated view of WWII for you.

    Operation Barbarossa Was A Preventive Attack: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7999
    and:
    Introduction to HITLER’S WAR: http://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/

    The Communists ‘won’ because they had vast material support from ‘the Allies’.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Respect
    stop thinking the other way around , paranoid western idiot

    A paranoid believes in his sick mind that everyone is against him , so he may feel entitled to attacks others " preventively " , but he is a paranoid psychopath .

    The facts : Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .

    Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot .
    , @byrresheim
    Don't feed the trolls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Aramis Kretzer
    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.

    to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi

    The United States, unlike Russia, DOES have Jewish and Israeli influence problem. It is difficult to deny it after 26 standing ovations by the joint session of US Congress to Bibi. I cringed from disgust and I am Russian. So, I wouldn’t call what Phil Giraldi does “tired”. Another matter that, and Phil addresses it once in a while, Israeli influence issue must always be used in connection to Christian Zionist enablers of this atrocity and those, so called “Christians”, are a very large strata of the American society. Their loyalty to Israel trumps that to the United States. It is impossible to ignore and it is revolting.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro, RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Aramis Kretzer

    So, I wouldn’t call what Phil Giraldi does “tired”.
     
    How about "shop-worn"?

    I agree with Giraldi, for the most part. But, it's like the old Art Buchwald columns. Same jokes, different day. I like to see a different POV be expressed, and Shamir is a good addition. Can't say as I agree with everything Shamir says, either. So what's the problem?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. escobar says:

    Create a society which worships money, in which “money talks,” in which morality–religion-based or secular-is abandoned or scorned, and Jews will seize a leadership role and strengthen the crass materialism they embody. As CEO of Goldman Sachs once quipped: “We are doing God’s work.”
    Their God’s work, who opposes the values of Jesus in Matthew, chasing the bankers out of the temple.
    Remember when Clinton was referred to as the first “black president.” Not really, but maybe he was the first “Jewish president.” (There are, among Jews, the usual exceptions. Fewer now than 50 years ago. Power corrupts.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Jesus was actually popular with the Jews. Jew Testament says so.

    Luke 4:15 He was teaching in their synagogues, and everyone praised him.
     
    Sure the Jews had an internal spat, and the Jews killed Jesus, another Jew. Communists had internal spats too, and killed Trotsky, another Communist. Surely you don't think we have to support Trotsky to be anti-Communist, do you? The whole enemy-of-my-enemy logic is thin gruel, especially when applied to Jew-on-Jew violence. Who cares which side is more right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. renfro says:

    Today, there are fewer and fewer such voices; and that’s why God bless Ron Unz for picking up the torch.

    Fewer is becoming more……put your ear to the ground and hear the hoof beats. The Israel problem and therefore the Jewish problem is a world wide matter , not just a US or gentile vr jew matter.

    In rare step, International Criminal Court reaches out to ‘Palestinian victims’

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-to-formally-protest-iccs-unusual-appeal-to-palestinian-victims/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

    In an exceedingly rare move, the International Criminal Court last week launched a campaign to reach out to “victims of the situation in Palestine,” raising the ire of Israeli officials and criticism from a former Foreign Ministry legal adviser.
    In a little-noticed press release issued Friday, three judges who are members of the so-called pretrial chamber dealing with Palestinian complaints of alleged Israeli war crimes ordered the court’s registry “to establish, as soon as practicable, a system of public information and outreach activities for the benefit of the victims and affected communities in the situation in Palestine.”
    Furthermore, the judges required the registry — a neutral organ of the court providing administrative support — to open an “informative page on the Court’s website” geared exclusively to Palestinians, and to report on the progress of its activities every three months.
    “The Registry shall establish, as soon as practicable, a system of public information and outreach activities among the affected communities and particularly the victims of the situation in Palestine,” judges Péter Kovács, Marc Perrin de Brichambaut and Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou wrote.
    The judges’ goal is the creation of a “continuous system of interaction between the Court and victims, residing within or outside of Palestine,” they added.
    Victims “play an important role” in the court’s work, the judges noted.
    “Victims have therefore the right to be heard and considered, at stages of the proceedings determined to be appropriate, and the Court has the duty to effectively enable them to exercise this right.”

    Alan Baker, a former legal adviser to Israel’s Foreign Ministry who was involved in negotiating the ICC’s founding statute, slammed the statement as “quite crazy,” arguing that the court has allowed itself to become a tool of pro-Palestinian propaganda.”
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    *This statement is perfect example of how Israel/jews make up their own alternate reality …Jerusalem has long argued that the ICC has no jurisdiction over matters related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, since it has no jurisdiction over Israel (which is not a member state) and because Palestine is not a state and therefore cannot exercise jurisdiction over the West Bank. /i>

    The ICC does have jurisdiction over Israel regardless of whether it is a member state or not if it commits crimes within a member state–The International Law statues very plainly state that non member state actors can be charged by the ICC when they commit crimes in a member state…..and Palestine is a member state and signatory to the ICC and Rome Statues.
    Palestine was recognized as a “State by the UN on 29 November 2012, the UN General Assembly passed a motion making Palestine an offcial “non-member observer state” by a vote of 138 to 9, with 41 abstentions.
    As of 3 August 2018, 137 of the 193 member states of the United Nations and two non-member states have recognized the State of Palestine.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. @bjondo

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion
     
    From wikipedia:

    Boris Abramovich Berezovsky was born in 1946, in Moscow, to Abram Markovich Berezovsky (1911–1979),[28] a Jewish civil engineer in construction works,[29][30] and his wife, Anna Aleksandrovna Gelman (22 November 1923 – 3 September 2013).[31] Berezovsky always stressed his Jewish heritage, although by Orthodox Jewish law he was not Jewish, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish.

    Where else do you deceive?

    Maybe I have misread?

    Where else do you deceive?

    So, you have no clue. Neither does Wiki, which in such issues is as reliable as Ford model T .

    https://www.yuga.ru/news/291046/

    Google Translate will help. Obviously you are also cut off Russian TV to know anything but Russian Orthodoxy and re-baptizing of Berezovsky was a huge issue in Russia when SOB was killed by British.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia's "official" media arm RT:

    Berezovsky has always stressed his Jewish origins, although under Jewish law he is not a Jew, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish. However, aged 47, he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.
     
    And according to Haa'retz:

    The Moscow native, the son of a Jewish father and a mother with Jewish roots, immigrated to Israel in 1993 but later renounced his Israeli citizenship, according to the Israeli news website Walla.
     
    Of course everyone knows that sub-human cattle (like Russians) do not get Israeli citizenship, and the test for that itself is pretty strict.

    More "fake history" ... Are you Communist? Jewish?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @jacques sheete

    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.
     
    Yeah, right.

    Moreover, there is nothing wrong about taking money from wealthy Jews. I did it.

     

    The guy is still pure as freshly fallen snow, right? Psst, I have a ski resort in Florida that I'll let you have cheap. Cuz yer a special fella...

    The guy is still pure as freshly fallen snow, right? Psst, I have a ski resort in Florida that I’ll let you have cheap. Cuz yer a special fella…

    Shamir’s opinion is basic, untrammeled by Giraldi’s vendettas and Sailer’s need-to-please his groupies.

    Disabuse yourself of any belief that your opinion of my opinion troubles me. Gripe about adolescent merde like that to your fellow adolescents. Don’t waste my time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Anonymous[346] • Disclaimer says:
    @nsa
    Patrick Quillin treated over 5000 cancer patients and observed that he never witnessed a recovery by a smoker. Not one....they all died......poisoned from the inside out. Only a pompous blowhard like Izzie Shamir could justify a stupid activity like smoking because a few vile jooie shysters made a buck going after the tobacco companies. Is anyone else tired of foreigners like Izzie carrying their obscure crappy old world disputes over here to the new world? And his prose is terrible.......needs a course in remedial English at some junior college.

    I personally know two people who survived tobacco-induced lung cancer, and I’m not even a doctor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:
    @escobar
    Create a society which worships money, in which "money talks," in which morality--religion-based or secular-is abandoned or scorned, and Jews will seize a leadership role and strengthen the crass materialism they embody. As CEO of Goldman Sachs once quipped: "We are doing God's work."
    Their God's work, who opposes the values of Jesus in Matthew, chasing the bankers out of the temple.
    Remember when Clinton was referred to as the first "black president." Not really, but maybe he was the first "Jewish president." (There are, among Jews, the usual exceptions. Fewer now than 50 years ago. Power corrupts.)

    Jesus was actually popular with the Jews. Jew Testament says so.

    Luke 4:15 He was teaching in their synagogues, and everyone praised him.

    Sure the Jews had an internal spat, and the Jews killed Jesus, another Jew. Communists had internal spats too, and killed Trotsky, another Communist. Surely you don’t think we have to support Trotsky to be anti-Communist, do you? The whole enemy-of-my-enemy logic is thin gruel, especially when applied to Jew-on-Jew violence. Who cares which side is more right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Andrei Martyanov

    to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi
     
    The United States, unlike Russia, DOES have Jewish and Israeli influence problem. It is difficult to deny it after 26 standing ovations by the joint session of US Congress to Bibi. I cringed from disgust and I am Russian. So, I wouldn't call what Phil Giraldi does "tired". Another matter that, and Phil addresses it once in a while, Israeli influence issue must always be used in connection to Christian Zionist enablers of this atrocity and those, so called "Christians", are a very large strata of the American society. Their loyalty to Israel trumps that to the United States. It is impossible to ignore and it is revolting.

    So, I wouldn’t call what Phil Giraldi does “tired”.

    How about “shop-worn”?

    I agree with Giraldi, for the most part. But, it’s like the old Art Buchwald columns. Same jokes, different day. I like to see a different POV be expressed, and Shamir is a good addition. Can’t say as I agree with everything Shamir says, either. So what’s the problem?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
    No problem at all. I understand.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Sparkon says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Really? Why then did Zionist co-founder Max Nordau speak with such eloquent confidence in “the future world war” already by 1903?
     
    Have you ever tried to read not just Zionists or about Zionists? Truck load of intellectuals ranging from non-Jewish conservatives to Marxists felt the approach of the war. Hell, after reading Househofer, Mahan or Mackinder and what Imperialism looked like even people with an average IQ kinda can get the idea that a big brawl was just the matter of when, not if.

    That wasn’t the point, but now that you’ve referred to this “truck load of intellectuals,” predicting “a future world war,” as Zionist co-founder Nordau did, would you mind providing a direct quotation or two from that truckload of intellectuals to support your argument?

    You stated that WWI had “very little to do with Jews.”

    In response — to contradict your claim — I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.
     
    Sure, whatever floats your boat. I was wrong, you were right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. CalDre says:
    @Israel Shamir
    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin's words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.

    Aside from what others have written on the evidence that Jews dominated the Bolsheviks (including half-Jew Lenin and rabid Jew Trotsky, who spent the years prior to the “Revolution” (Carnage) collecting money from Jewish bankers on Wall Street, the fact is Jews dominated the Bolsheviks and especially the genocidal anti-Christian terror squads.

    Stalin beat Trotsky to power by a historical coincidence, and purged a good number of Jews, leading to their reduction in the Bolshevik leadership as Shamir points out.

    But, he did not purge them all, and the most vicious and violent among his remaining servants were Jews. E.g., Lazar Kaganovich was responsible for the Holodomor, the grand theft of food from farmers which led to millions and millions of deaths (ironically, though it was the Jew Kaganovich and the Georgian Stalin who made the decisions, and it was carried out largely by Ukrainian nationals in Ukraine (the famine also decimated parts of Russia and other Soviet Republics, and even in Ukraine, it was most egregious in the more Russian Eastern oblasts), Ukrainians blame Russians for the crime – and we may note that Jews to this day control virtually all of the mass media in Ukraine, which is responsible for creating this impression and in general the vicious Russophobia in Ukraine).

    Kruschev purged even more of the maniacal Jews, including Lazar Kaganovich. Finally after all Jews were purged from Communism, it became a tolerable system. Gone was the Red Terror, mass murdering and gulags. (That is, until Jews once again seized power in Israel, now they do it to their Palestinian neighbors under the Jew supremacist banner of Zionism, though less “roughly”, not out of morals, but out of politics, being too cruel (although they are already immensely cruel) to their Palestinian “subhumans” would not be “good for the Jews”, given limits on their global power at this juncture.)

    Shamir is pushing fake history here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @Sparkon
    That wasn't the point, but now that you've referred to this "truck load of intellectuals," predicting "a future world war," as Zionist co-founder Nordau did, would you mind providing a direct quotation or two from that truckload of intellectuals to support your argument?

    You stated that WWI had "very little to do with Jews."

    In response -- to contradict your claim -- I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.

    I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.

    Sure, whatever floats your boat. I was wrong, you were right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon
    Well thank you, but I really was hoping for a quotation or two, as I haven't read Househofer, Mahan or Mackinder.

    Of course, there are always those who profit from war, including--strangely enough--even the munitions manufacturers, so no one should be too surprised that there is no monopoly on warmongering, nor shortage of warmongers and war profiteers, as anyone knows who's read Smedley Butler's classic War Is A Racket.

    Meanwhile, I did find another gem from Litman Rosenthal about an even earlier prediction of an impending "great European war" from the other co-founder of the World Zionist Organization, Dr. Theodore Herzl himself:

    HERZL’S PROPHECY ON THE GREAT WAR.

    In 1897, just before the first Zionist Congress at Basle, according to Litman Rosenthal, in his “My Siberian Diary,” Dr. Theodore Herzl made the following prophecy of a great European war:

    “It may be that Turkey will refuse or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. A European war is imminent."

    I allowed myself an ironic smile at Herzl’s last words. He turned to me with his magic glance.

    “I see you smile,” he said. “You are sceptical of what I have told you. The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European War is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations, and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution of the Jewish Question. We must prove to them that the problem of the Orient and Palestine is one with the problems of the Jews--both must be solved together. We must prove to them that the Jewish problem is a world problem and that a world problem must be solved by the world. And the solution must be the return of Palestine to the Jewish people.”

    These words of Dr. Herzl I will never forget. Seventeen years have now passed since those words were spoken and the great moment has come. The watch in Herzl’s hand has reached the expected hour. Will those who now represent us be able to use this great moment in the interest of our people? I would like to believe that they will, but doubts assail me. Sitting here, amid the snow and ice of Siberia, far away from my brothers, I remember that summer day on the banks of the Rhine when the great prophet foretold our future, and, remembering that scene, the tears well into my eyes.

    Kuznetsk, Siberia
    Dec. 15, 1914

     

    (my transcription from pages of the American Messianic Fellowship magazine here:)

    Herzl's 1896 manifesto Der Judenstaat is considered by many the promulgating document for the entire modern Zionist movement, and here he is already just a year later in 1897 predicting an imminent great European war -- which is actually still 17 years in the future -- so who could be blamed for thinking there might be a connection between Zionism on the one hand, and warmongering on the other?

    Of course, the bigger questions are: who has empowered the Jews, and who has profited greatly from their Zionism?

    Hint: Mightn't it be Blighty -- Perfidious Albion?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. CalDre says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Where else do you deceive?
     
    So, you have no clue. Neither does Wiki, which in such issues is as reliable as Ford model T .

    https://www.yuga.ru/news/291046/

    Google Translate will help. Obviously you are also cut off Russian TV to know anything but Russian Orthodoxy and re-baptizing of Berezovsky was a huge issue in Russia when SOB was killed by British.

    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia’s “official” media arm RT:

    Berezovsky has always stressed his Jewish origins, although under Jewish law he is not a Jew, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish. However, aged 47, he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.

    And according to Haa’retz:

    The Moscow native, the son of a Jewish father and a mother with Jewish roots, immigrated to Israel in 1993 but later renounced his Israeli citizenship, according to the Israeli news website Walla.

    Of course everyone knows that sub-human cattle (like Russians) do not get Israeli citizenship, and the test for that itself is pretty strict.

    More “fake history” … Are you Communist? Jewish?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia’s “official” media arm RT:

     

    Hey, sure--poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all. I quote your quote from RT.

    he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.
     
    What do you think, did you show me, ah? I will return you to my original post--I know, English language is an issue for you, but here it is, I quote myself:

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion.
     
    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-throne-and-the-altar/#comment-2467070

    I guess, I can now rest calmly in my uber-Jewishness (having, of course, low Russian nobility lineage and Cossacks too), but what do I really know about Russian history and media after you utterly "destroyed" my Berezovsky argument, LOL.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Anonymous[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Likeitornot
    Re: "For more than 50 years, the Catholic Church has lost every battle in the culture wars."

    Of course. It has been destroyed byVatican II. The last Pope was Pius XII.

    Catholics worshiped Jews, long before Vatican II or any other lame excuse you may concoct.

    To the Jews ‘belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship…’”

    Catechism of the Catholic Church

    Just like the Jew Testament says. No theological hairsplitting can undo such a horrible foundation.

    We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22

    What white man needs “saved,” anyway, by a Jew or otherwise? Saved from what?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. @CalDre
    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia's "official" media arm RT:

    Berezovsky has always stressed his Jewish origins, although under Jewish law he is not a Jew, as his maternal grandmother was not Jewish. However, aged 47, he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.
     
    And according to Haa'retz:

    The Moscow native, the son of a Jewish father and a mother with Jewish roots, immigrated to Israel in 1993 but later renounced his Israeli citizenship, according to the Israeli news website Walla.
     
    Of course everyone knows that sub-human cattle (like Russians) do not get Israeli citizenship, and the test for that itself is pretty strict.

    More "fake history" ... Are you Communist? Jewish?

    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia’s “official” media arm RT:

    Hey, sure–poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all. I quote your quote from RT.

    he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.

    What do you think, did you show me, ah? I will return you to my original post–I know, English language is an issue for you, but here it is, I quote myself:

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion.

    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-throne-and-the-altar/#comment-2467070

    I guess, I can now rest calmly in my uber-Jewishness (having, of course, low Russian nobility lineage and Cossacks too), but what do I really know about Russian history and media after you utterly “destroyed” my Berezovsky argument, LOL.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    Hey, sure–poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all.
     
    For me English is a third language, but yet, quite honestly, your comprehension problem is not with English, your problem is that you are being a dogmatic know-nothing. I hope you are not always like this - does your unjustified arrogance also reflect your understanding of military matters?

    So let's get to the point, shall we. The context of the thread was whether Jews had twice conquered or almost conquered Russia. the second time being in 1990s under Yeltsin. To which you replied that Berezovsky was an Orthodox Christian. But being Orthodox Christian in name does not make you not a Jew, nobody claimed he was a religious Jew (most Jews, certainly in the "West", are in fact atheists, even while maintaining the hyper tribalism of classic Judaism). He was a Jew by birth and in 1993 he claimed Israeli citizenship. So your distraction by pointing out that he apparently converted to Orthodox Christianity by undergoing some simple rituals doesn't mean much. From what I can tell from that lowlife's actions, he probably thought that was better for business, given that everyone in Russia was starting to realize the Jewish oligarchs were seizing control, a bit of diversion that "Cossaks" like you fall for like awed children.

    Apart from tribalism and identity, if you are so dumb as to think a professed Christian cannot be a religious Jew I suggest you study the term crypto-Jew (hint: it's a fake conversion for convenience). Did he attend a Russian Orthodox church in UK? Or was his "public conversion" the only connection? Did he even go through the catechism?

    As to your alleged "nobility lineage", nobody cares. And speaking Russian does not make you undisputed king of Russian history - in fact many Russians disagree with you and beside that I am sure you have opinions about histories of other peoples do, no? Being of the same ethnicity does not make you an expert (except only Jews can speak about Jewish history, oy vey).

    You answered indirectly you are not Jewish, and given your silence on the Communist question, you have also indirectly answered that.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Anonymous[295] • Disclaimer says:

    Jesus himself, a typical Jew, was a Jewish Supremacist. He made a goyim female beg like a dog to a foreign Jewish “Master” for crumbs from a table set “only” for Jews in Matthew 15:21-28. And he specifically denounced white Goyim patriarchy in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    But muh NA(((J)))ALT! kek!

    Jesus didn’t have dual loyalties to both Jews and Whites. Nobody does, no matter how sincere they proclaim their Dual Loyalty. Jews gonna Jew.

    No white man ever needed Jesus, or any other Jew. Quit being so pathetically needy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    For someone who doesn’t like Jews Christianity and Jesus you sure know a lot about the Bible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2013/nov/19/the-parallax-view-kennedy-assassination

    The Liberal media and Hollywood that decry alternative news people on the Internet as ‘conspiracy theory’ lunatics once harbored the same kind of mentality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  105. @Jeff Stryker
    Did anybody here ever GO TO COLLEGE? Pot fries about half the people that use it? I was a pothead in college.

    Most people quit getting high everyday after they graduate from college. But we all know those guys that dropped out and drifted to Washington state and live in a tree somewhere.

    Some people are wasted as bad on pot as they would be on any other drug-and I was toking in the 90's on common-or-garden pot.

    Many smokers are successful people. Not now, because less people smoke in general, but tobacco does not turn a person into schizophrenia. Psychoactive drugs do that.

    You mean to say that “fewer” people smoke nowadays. As to marijuana, however, I doubt that’s true in the USA.

    In any event, I know that my psychological and emotional issues have nothing to do with pot. I have plenty of people who will testify that I was this messed up before I ever smoked ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @mcohen
    Tobacco will be phased out because you cannot eat it.the land is needed to grow food.it is that simple.

    Most weed’s been grown in grow houses, not outside for decades now. Now that weed’s legal taxed and certified, the profit will be less.

    But just 5o primo plants of high THC weed can bring a profit of $100,000 a year. The 99 legal medical marijuana plants can double the profit. It’s a lot of hard work but isn’t difficult to manage if you have a regular job. The electricity bill will be very high unless you have an electrician friend who will “adjust” the wiring for you. It’s also possible to mess with the water meter.

    The 99 legal medical plants can be grown in a 8 by 10 space even with the water light and electrical motors hooked up. The stripping and packaging can be done anywhere.

    If you don’t have a garage use a small bedroom next to a bathroom and do your own piping. You can save on electricity by building a just big enough box for the plants and grow lights If you are growing just a few plants for personal use all you need is a few pots, a grow light and you can manually water, fertilize and squirt pesticide in the bugs.

    I think the only people who grow weed outside are the illegal Mexicans who grow it in the national forests. But it’s vsry low quality because of lack of grow lights and bugs.

    Medical marijuana for pain is bogus. It really doesn’t break the contact between the site of the pain and the brain. Only the prescription pain killers do that. For lesser pain, aspirin Tylenol and muscle relaxers are as good or better as marijuana.

    The growers might do ok with legal marijuana. The certification, testing, and incredible taxes might, just might mean that no one will buy legal weed and just go on buying it from the illegal growers. Some liberal California politicians have proposed a 45 percent tax on legal weed.

    It’s probably possible to grow low THC hemp for paper cloth and things outside. But I really can’t see growing primo high THC weed outside.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    Don't

    Bogart that joint my friend....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Jesus himself, a typical Jew, was a Jewish Supremacist. He made a goyim female beg like a dog to a foreign Jewish “Master” for crumbs from a table set “only” for Jews in Matthew 15:21-28. And he specifically denounced white Goyim patriarchy in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    But muh NA(((J)))ALT! kek!

    Jesus didn't have dual loyalties to both Jews and Whites. Nobody does, no matter how sincere they proclaim their Dual Loyalty. Jews gonna Jew.

    No white man ever needed Jesus, or any other Jew. Quit being so pathetically needy.

    For someone who doesn’t like Jews Christianity and Jesus you sure know a lot about the Bible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Who would want to make a habit of being a loser?

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
     
    Or rather, who would want to be a habitual loser, other than the dupes of Rabbi Jesus?

    "But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil...But I say unto you, Love your enemies." -Schlomo on the Mount
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. mcohen says:

    Normally i never read the articles on unz.they are mostly tedious and repetitive.i go straight to the comics section because laughter is the best medicine.
    This time round I found the opposite.the comics secton came first.”israel shamir” is actually quite amusing in this parody of churches.a parade of statements of excitable buffonery, a touch of brown bled by a clown. A judge all dressed up in a red gown.the jews rolled the world back to the dark ages,he uttered to rattle the cages.like soft cheese squeezed from a tube,he presents “facts” in need of a lube.
    If only you knew what lies ahead, for the truth is long dead

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. Sean says:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/german-condoms-russian-revolution.html
    Goods were exported to Denmark (which was legal), the packaging was changed (illegal), and then they were resold to countries where imports from Germany were banned. Part of the profit found its way into the Bolsheviks’ coffers via businesses in Stockholm. A key part here was played by Yakov Fürstenberg, the manager of a Scandinavian-based import-export company whose directors, Alexander Helphand and Georg Sklarz, were known agents of Germany. Though Lenin publicly disdained Helphand, Fürstenberg was one of his closest contacts, his north European fixer.

    They got him there and they financed him once he was there, and he got Russia out the war, which is what they wanted. He thought of himself as an agent of international Marxism, so the idea that he could be pro Germany (or pro Russia) never entered Lenin’s head.

    Lenin’ … protested that he had snubbed every agent the Germans sent him. He insisted (rightly) that his party had triumphed by giving voice and shape to real passions and despairs. Still, cash had been essential. In the summer of 1917, the British estimated that it would cost them 2 million pounds a month to match Lenin’s propaganda effort. The high price had to take account of Bolshevism’s genuine appeal, but even Lenin knew that newspapers and posters did not print and distribute themselves.[..]At the end of 1917, Germany’s foreign minister, Richard von Kühlmann, gloated about his country’s role in November’s Bolshevik coup. Berlin, he said, had long schemed to subvert Russia. The challenge had been to find a person who could do the job. The Germans had backed a range of hopefuls, from Finnish nationalists to Central Asian jihadists. “It was not until the Bolsheviks had received from us a steady flow of funds through various channels,” Kuhlmann explained in a frank memorandum, “that they were in a position to build up their main organ, Pravda, to conduct energetic propaganda and to extend the originally narrow basis of their party.”

    Trump could insist (rightly) that he triumphed by giving voice and shape to real passions and despairs. Trump also had rhetorical skills and brand recognition honed in a decade on his TV show. Crucially, the MSM gave him early coverage (for the ratings he brought) out of ignorance of his chances, and once he started winning it was too late to deny him the nomination. His rating draw powers, personal recognition and wealth equaled a billion dollar campaign. Clinton could still have won if she had listened to her husband. The Tsarina was regarded as German whore, just as Marie Antoinette was before the French revolution (there are other simulates that cannot be gone into here), Tsarist Russia’s major mistake was very simple: they had a small police force relative to the population. Their minor mistake was not going after the families of those who tried to kill the Tsar.

    The gardener is not old he is 47, and he may, or may not, be dead in weeks. The judgement against Monsanto is due to films like Erin Brockovich. Just kidding the woman in Erin Brockovich had Hodgkin’s lymphoma, whereas the black gardener has non Hodgkin lymphoma so there obviously is no connection.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    "Sealed train" with $20 million in gold from (((NY))) bankers, arranged by (((Trotsky))), enabled by the (((Warburg))) family.

    There is little doubt that Bolshevik Jews and Germany had a common interest here - Germany to end the war and Jews to begin their Bolshevik (Jewish Communist) totalitarian dictatorship under the fraudulent banner (which they still carry to this day) of "liberty" and "equality".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Aramis Kretzer
    Fascinating. I love the shift in viewpoint presented by Shamir, in contrast to the tired, bedraggled chestnuts from Giraldi and Sailer. Much more analytically considered, much more useful exposition of fact.

    I, for one, always enjoy Giraldi and Sailer; and they have much bigger readership on this site. But thank you anyway!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Jew
    I like Sailer too. He makes sense.

    As far as Giraldi "он бешеный пес". No matter that you are a christian convert he will bite you just because your name is "Israel"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @Aramis Kretzer

    So, I wouldn’t call what Phil Giraldi does “tired”.
     
    How about "shop-worn"?

    I agree with Giraldi, for the most part. But, it's like the old Art Buchwald columns. Same jokes, different day. I like to see a different POV be expressed, and Shamir is a good addition. Can't say as I agree with everything Shamir says, either. So what's the problem?

    No problem at all. I understand.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Respect says:
    @Wally
    Except the German 'invaders' were forced to 'invade'.

    I suggest a less Zionist manipulated view of WWII for you.

    Operation Barbarossa Was A Preventive Attack: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7999
    and:
    Introduction to HITLER'S WAR: http://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/

    The Communists 'won' because they had vast material support from 'the Allies'.

    www.codoh.com

    stop thinking the other way around , paranoid western idiot

    A paranoid believes in his sick mind that everyone is against him , so he may feel entitled to attacks others ” preventively ” , but he is a paranoid psychopath .

    The facts : Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .

    Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot .

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .
     
    Nobody is denying that. The question is whether the invasion was in preemptive self-defense. An example would have been Iraq attacking US troops as they were being amassed in the Kuwaiti desert.

    Stalin and his Red Horde was poised to invade Europe to try to conquer it all, and thereby the world, culminating in Lenin's Imperialist Strategy of world conquest. The evidence is overwhelming. Nazi Germany's greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat.
    , @Wally
    My my, your little panties are in a twist.
    you said:
    "Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .
    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs
    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot ."

    "Maybe"? IOW, you're making it up.
    Your link provides no proof that they were "addicts". The link is just some nutter making up Zionist propaganda. LOL

    Of course Germany manufactured drugs, like most countries.

    In spite of the ridiculously childish nature of your claims, there is no doubt that all parties in WWII, and all wars for that matter, used stimulants to keep their troops going. Not to mention pain pills, alcohol, you name it. Drug use in war is as old as war itself. Rather unsurprising really.
    However, as is required in our Jew dominated media environment, only the greatly exaggerated 'Nazis on drugs', is acceptable discussion when in fact the Allies were using drugs. That information is not news.

    Yes, Germany attacked the USSR, they had no choice.
    Your dodge of the information that I posted which shoots down your Zionist silliness is classic 'I can't hear you'. LOL
    https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/20180118_outrage.png?itok=RhdJTA4x

    But then you are a not so bright Zionist, a paranoid one at that. LOL

    Cheers.

    www.codoh.com

    The '6,000,000 Jews' lie and the laughing Mexican:
    https://youtu.be/nxbV3RsyQwI

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. CalDre says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Apparently it is you who has no clue. According to Russia’s “official” media arm RT:

     

    Hey, sure--poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all. I quote your quote from RT.

    he got Israeli citizenship and became an orthodox Christian a year later.
     
    What do you think, did you show me, ah? I will return you to my original post--I know, English language is an issue for you, but here it is, I quote myself:

    Strangely, lowlife Berezovsky, was “vykrestok”, he was Russian Orthodox by religion.
     
    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-throne-and-the-altar/#comment-2467070

    I guess, I can now rest calmly in my uber-Jewishness (having, of course, low Russian nobility lineage and Cossacks too), but what do I really know about Russian history and media after you utterly "destroyed" my Berezovsky argument, LOL.

    Hey, sure–poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all.

    For me English is a third language, but yet, quite honestly, your comprehension problem is not with English, your problem is that you are being a dogmatic know-nothing. I hope you are not always like this – does your unjustified arrogance also reflect your understanding of military matters?

    So let’s get to the point, shall we. The context of the thread was whether Jews had twice conquered or almost conquered Russia. the second time being in 1990s under Yeltsin. To which you replied that Berezovsky was an Orthodox Christian. But being Orthodox Christian in name does not make you not a Jew, nobody claimed he was a religious Jew (most Jews, certainly in the “West”, are in fact atheists, even while maintaining the hyper tribalism of classic Judaism). He was a Jew by birth and in 1993 he claimed Israeli citizenship. So your distraction by pointing out that he apparently converted to Orthodox Christianity by undergoing some simple rituals doesn’t mean much. From what I can tell from that lowlife’s actions, he probably thought that was better for business, given that everyone in Russia was starting to realize the Jewish oligarchs were seizing control, a bit of diversion that “Cossaks” like you fall for like awed children.

    Apart from tribalism and identity, if you are so dumb as to think a professed Christian cannot be a religious Jew I suggest you study the term crypto-Jew (hint: it’s a fake conversion for convenience). Did he attend a Russian Orthodox church in UK? Or was his “public conversion” the only connection? Did he even go through the catechism?

    As to your alleged “nobility lineage”, nobody cares. And speaking Russian does not make you undisputed king of Russian history – in fact many Russians disagree with you and beside that I am sure you have opinions about histories of other peoples do, no? Being of the same ethnicity does not make you an expert (except only Jews can speak about Jewish history, oy vey).

    You answered indirectly you are not Jewish, and given your silence on the Communist question, you have also indirectly answered that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @I.M
    there was an excellent article (or two) on here about the overwhelming subversion of the catholic church by the same groups mentioned, i looked for it but couldn't find it. I wonder if somebody could link to it again.

    It completely validates your point that such "conversions" are a standard operating procedure and tactic for centuries. It also gives a dramatic insight into the degree of the subversive capabilities of such groups, at a much earlier point in time, to the point where absolutely nothing can be ruled out. Such capabilities have only grown stronger and more refined since.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. CalDre says:
    @Respect
    stop thinking the other way around , paranoid western idiot

    A paranoid believes in his sick mind that everyone is against him , so he may feel entitled to attacks others " preventively " , but he is a paranoid psychopath .

    The facts : Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .

    Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot .

    Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .

    Nobody is denying that. The question is whether the invasion was in preemptive self-defense. An example would have been Iraq attacking US troops as they were being amassed in the Kuwaiti desert.

    Stalin and his Red Horde was poised to invade Europe to try to conquer it all, and thereby the world, culminating in Lenin’s Imperialist Strategy of world conquest. The evidence is overwhelming. Nazi Germany’s greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Respect
    another western idiot , yea ,the yankees , the USA , have done " preventive " attacks against most of the nations on earth , the US does 50% of the military expenses of the world , the US
    has 1000 military occupation bases out of the USA , and the US has been in war for about 220 years out of its 242 years of existence .

    But it is " preventive " you know , all the endless US wars are " preventive " , of course , The US is a pacifist nation of course .

    and regarding Germany , you say " Nazi Germany’s greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat. " , well Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past .
    , @jilles dykstra
    Hitler's attack was defensive
    Bogdan Musial, ‘Kampfplatz Deutschland, Stalins Kriegspläne gegen den Westen’, Berlin 2008
    The book is based on Russian archives, already closed again
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. CalDre says:
    @Sean

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/german-condoms-russian-revolution.html
    Goods were exported to Denmark (which was legal), the packaging was changed (illegal), and then they were resold to countries where imports from Germany were banned. Part of the profit found its way into the Bolsheviks’ coffers via businesses in Stockholm. A key part here was played by Yakov Fürstenberg, the manager of a Scandinavian-based import-export company whose directors, Alexander Helphand and Georg Sklarz, were known agents of Germany. Though Lenin publicly disdained Helphand, Fürstenberg was one of his closest contacts, his north European fixer.
     
    They got him there and they financed him once he was there, and he got Russia out the war, which is what they wanted. He thought of himself as an agent of international Marxism, so the idea that he could be pro Germany (or pro Russia) never entered Lenin's head.

    Lenin’ ... protested that he had snubbed every agent the Germans sent him. He insisted (rightly) that his party had triumphed by giving voice and shape to real passions and despairs. Still, cash had been essential. In the summer of 1917, the British estimated that it would cost them 2 million pounds a month to match Lenin’s propaganda effort. The high price had to take account of Bolshevism’s genuine appeal, but even Lenin knew that newspapers and posters did not print and distribute themselves.[..]At the end of 1917, Germany’s foreign minister, Richard von Kühlmann, gloated about his country’s role in November’s Bolshevik coup. Berlin, he said, had long schemed to subvert Russia. The challenge had been to find a person who could do the job. The Germans had backed a range of hopefuls, from Finnish nationalists to Central Asian jihadists. “It was not until the Bolsheviks had received from us a steady flow of funds through various channels,” Kuhlmann explained in a frank memorandum, “that they were in a position to build up their main organ, Pravda, to conduct energetic propaganda and to extend the originally narrow basis of their party.”
     
    Trump could insist (rightly) that he triumphed by giving voice and shape to real passions and despairs. Trump also had rhetorical skills and brand recognition honed in a decade on his TV show. Crucially, the MSM gave him early coverage (for the ratings he brought) out of ignorance of his chances, and once he started winning it was too late to deny him the nomination. His rating draw powers, personal recognition and wealth equaled a billion dollar campaign. Clinton could still have won if she had listened to her husband. The Tsarina was regarded as German whore, just as Marie Antoinette was before the French revolution (there are other simulates that cannot be gone into here), Tsarist Russia's major mistake was very simple: they had a small police force relative to the population. Their minor mistake was not going after the families of those who tried to kill the Tsar.

    The gardener is not old he is 47, and he may, or may not, be dead in weeks. The judgement against Monsanto is due to films like Erin Brockovich. Just kidding the woman in Erin Brockovich had Hodgkin's lymphoma, whereas the black gardener has non Hodgkin lymphoma so there obviously is no connection.
     

    “Sealed train” with $20 million in gold from (((NY))) bankers, arranged by (((Trotsky))), enabled by the (((Warburg))) family.

    There is little doubt that Bolshevik Jews and Germany had a common interest here – Germany to end the war and Jews to begin their Bolshevik (Jewish Communist) totalitarian dictatorship under the fraudulent banner (which they still carry to this day) of “liberty” and “equality”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Where to begin? Let’s commence by welcoming you back where you truly belong to dish out things unknown to Goyim about Jews. And, you do it so well and naturally thus I have missed your column on your erstwhile people, not so much to get all raved up about their shenanigans, which may be bigger than everyone else combined, to get acquainted with the only game worth knowing.

    But before I forget, a word or two regarding the Brahmins of India: in spite of denials by the vested anthropological interest in recent years, they are one truly identifiable outsiders, who must have had genesis in either Russian territories or nearby. And the Tribe has always been sympathetic as well as favorable to them since the British Raj, in spite of their diametrically opposite religious beliefs. And even today they are favored in the forms of CEOs of Pepsi, Google and Microsoft etc., albeit with apperant Tamil slant, of the priestly caste… the Ha Cohens do know their friendly counterparts, who maybe useful for the reconquest of Hindustan, if in the cards.

    Before emigrating to the U.S., I had attended, for a few years, a Jesuit run school, where a padre who resembled closely to Iberian Jews and who was a pompous math teacher of mine in the ninth grade and later went on ro become the archbishop of Kolkata (Calcutta). And now, whem I think about how the Order was captured by some members of the Tribe, gives me the chills thinking that what the Gazawa e Hind couldn’t achieve in one thousand years, is at hand with the newly formed partnership of the Cabal and clients, the House of Saud, unbeknownst to the natives. Poor me!

    Now on to the Jews! What I can and do understand is that a highly motivated group, with the kind of education and wherewithal, not to mention a long recorded continuity, unlike any other mercantile group, may be after total control and perhaps on the verge of attaining it with the aid of the modern technologies, as described in the notorious Czarist era fabrication, the Protocols. But to what end? You and Unz do not answer that pivotal question. After they have conquered the world through hook or crook, what are their plans for the rest of us… those are the real mysteries one would want to ascertain to prepare for that eventuality.

    It would certainly help if one of you concentrated on the esoteric details of the Judah in exile, which are certainly welcome; however, the other should focus on the ultimate goals of the Control, e.g. would they build the Third Temple and upon its completion, would the Hebrew G-D, YHWH, show up, to reward his people and punish the rest or simply fly them out to a different, richer planet and leave the rest to die out without the genius of the Chosen? I do wish someone would unlock the MYSTERIES!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  117. Anonymous[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    For someone who doesn’t like Jews Christianity and Jesus you sure know a lot about the Bible.

    Who would want to make a habit of being a loser?

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

    Or rather, who would want to be a habitual loser, other than the dupes of Rabbi Jesus?

    “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil…But I say unto you, Love your enemies.” -Schlomo on the Mount

    Read More
    • Replies: @Respect
    In life we all end up losers , getting old , dying , and nobody carries with him beyond the riches , diplomas , positions , land ... he had in this life .....

    Don`t you think it is a big mistery ? you ,winner , you übermesch ?
    , @Anon
    So you read it to know the enemy. The whole thing is pretty sick and horrible. Kill slay slay slay the enemy. The enemy was every other tribe the Hebrews encountered wasn’t it? Kill all the Egyptian babies, con a guy into marrying both the daughters in exchange for 14 years of slave labor, on and on.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Respect says:
    @CalDre

    Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .
     
    Nobody is denying that. The question is whether the invasion was in preemptive self-defense. An example would have been Iraq attacking US troops as they were being amassed in the Kuwaiti desert.

    Stalin and his Red Horde was poised to invade Europe to try to conquer it all, and thereby the world, culminating in Lenin's Imperialist Strategy of world conquest. The evidence is overwhelming. Nazi Germany's greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat.

    another western idiot , yea ,the yankees , the USA , have done ” preventive ” attacks against most of the nations on earth , the US does 50% of the military expenses of the world , the US
    has 1000 military occupation bases out of the USA , and the US has been in war for about 220 years out of its 242 years of existence .

    But it is ” preventive ” you know , all the endless US wars are ” preventive ” , of course , The US is a pacifist nation of course .

    and regarding Germany , you say ” Nazi Germany’s greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat. ” , well Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past .

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    the USA , have done ” preventive ” attacks
     
    I wrote nothing of the sort, and it's quite contrary to my posting history. Talk about paranoid delusions ....

    Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past
     
    WW II started when UK and France declared war on Germany. Certainly the invasion of Poland, which was not unlike hundreds of precedents in European history, did not start a WW, as Poland was quickly defeated.

    As to genocide, I think you Communists are better familiar with that. Even Soviet archives reveal the Holohoax is a myth but that the Bolsheviks launched the systematic destruction of Russian Christians, with vastly more Christians murdered then is even alleged in the absurd Holohoax. Though Stalin did get in the last laugh, starting this slander against Germany, with Jews more than happy to perpetuate the myth. Reminds one of the Katlyn Forest Massacre ...
    , @ploni almoni
    Who made Chamberlain sign a treaty with Poland in May 1939 to go to war if Poland was attacked? (Which happened in September.) It was not Chamberlain's idea or wish, nor that of the British people. The British people certainly did not want a war, and over Poland of all things, a nation brought back into existence by the Germans at the end of of World War II as a strategic measure against Russia. And World War II was completely un-necessary. Germany was correcting the depredations of Versailles. And even after the French and British started the war by invading Germany for a few miles, the Germans proposed peace. And who was at Versailles? In September 1939 The Poles pointed out to the British that the Soviets also attacked Poland, it was not just Germany that attacked Poland, but the British Government, for some reason, saw no reason to declare war on the Soviet Union. Did the British people want a war with Germany for Poland? On the face of it they did not. But Samuel Untermyer declared war on Germany in 1933. He started with Economic sanctions. Whose tactic is that? Whose war was it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. refl says:
    @Israel Shamir
    I asked a Russian historian Dmitry Pokrov to write a few words about Sutton's book.
    Here is his reply (google-translated from Russian)
    https://www.facebook.com/dpokrov/posts/10209522371975668
    Is there any truth there? Maybe there is, but lies and fancies are much greater. In something a minuscule role was played by a simple ignorance of the author, in some way his bias, and in some way his desire to create nonsense into logic - this gives an excuse for liberties.

    The first pages reveal the whole clumsiness of Sutton.

    "Robert Minor was a talented artist and writer, under the guise of which the Bolshevik revolutionary was hiding, in 1915 he was arrested in Russia on charges of subversion and later rescued by prominent Wall Street financiers."

    Strangely enough, Minor never concealed his left-radicalism - he was a member of the US Socialist Party, a trade unionist, an anarchist, an active and open opponent of the imperialist war (all in a short time). And this was before October 1917.
    Well, in 1915, of course, no one arrested him in Russia. at this time he was in New York and worked in a socialist newspaper.
    He was arrested in France in 1919 (before that he managed to visit the RSFSR from May to November 1918) for subversive activities (calling for sabotage of arms supplies for the intervention forces in Russia), but he was saved not by Wall Street interference, but by his his own father, who was a judge of the Texas District Court and who connected his connections for this.

    So, in one sentence at once a lot of mistakes or deliberate lies (it is difficult to say what the author did and how conscious). Is it possible to believe after such a Sutton or simply take seriously his "works"? Of course not.

    Below we stumble upon other moments (I will not deal with everything, but only that here it is defined like a lie).

    "The National City Bank branch in Petrograd was released from the Bolshevik decree on nationalization - the only such case among foreign and domestic banks in Russia."

    Not the only one, but the other way around. Societe General, Credit Lyonese, National City Bank - these three selectively taken banks of different countries (France and the USA) worked in Soviet Russia until 1920. And in 1920 the branches of these banks in the territory of the RSFSR were liquidated. But Sutton probably did not know about it. And if he knew, then religion did not allow him to mention French banks , because then the whole harmonious construction of the Bolsheviks-Wall Street would begin to crack.

    "One group of the Trotskyists immediately gained considerable influence in Mexico and wrote the Constitution of Queretaro for the revolutionary government of Carranza in 1917, thus giving Mexico the dubious honor of having the world's first government that adopted the constitution
    Soviet type. "

    Soviet type? So there were Soviets, then? It is interesting, however. And the Zapatists are Trotskyists, for example. That is, there was still no Trotskyism (well, in the sense that Trotsky had not yet become a bronze one), and the Zapatists had already struck Trotskyism? Well, yes, agrarians who actively participated in the Mexican revolution should not have insisted on their rights, according to the author. Yes, and it was Trotsky and the Trotskyites who prompted (through the Telegrams) the Liberal Party of Mexico to include in its 1906 program an eight-hour working day, a mandatory Sunday holiday and other "Trotskyisms" that later fell into the Mexican Constitution in 1917. And Andres Molina Enriquez (author of one of the articles of the Constitution) was probably also a prominent Trotskyite who came to Mexico.

    I appreciate that the idea of a jewish take over of Russia in the revolution is being demolished here, as it simply leads historical revisionism (well, in the West it is revisionism – I suppose the discussion among Russian historians to be somewhat more advanced) down the wrong way and an unhealthy one at that.

    Still, I take away from Sutton that Trotzky was moved to New York to secure influence in Russia after the revolution for the banks. The timetable of his movements suggests that the overthrow of the tsar was premeditaded by the anglosaxon elite well in advance (he was expelled from France to Spain already in October 1916, I believe).
    And I would suppose that with this background he had no chance ever to become Lenins successor.

    By 1917 it was clear that Germanys defeat was aproaching and the British empire would bot allow Russia to have their share in the spoils of victory.
    The tsar might have accepted a separate peace with Germany and was indeed overthrown by a new government that was hellbent on keeping its catastrophic obligation to the Entente.
    This led to the complete military breakdown of the 1917 offensive and subsequent breakdown of any order in Russia. The goal to defeat Germany and demolish Russia in the same act was achieved.

    My source: firtsworldwarhiddenhistory (in a rudimentary summary).

    By the way, western historiography on Russia is certainly mainly infantile. For ever so many years I have tried to understand just the deathtoll of stalinism and wondered, why the numbers never really add up – well, they were not meant to add up, but to be HUGE.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. CalDre says:
    @Respect
    another western idiot , yea ,the yankees , the USA , have done " preventive " attacks against most of the nations on earth , the US does 50% of the military expenses of the world , the US
    has 1000 military occupation bases out of the USA , and the US has been in war for about 220 years out of its 242 years of existence .

    But it is " preventive " you know , all the endless US wars are " preventive " , of course , The US is a pacifist nation of course .

    and regarding Germany , you say " Nazi Germany’s greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat. " , well Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past .

    the USA , have done ” preventive ” attacks

    I wrote nothing of the sort, and it’s quite contrary to my posting history. Talk about paranoid delusions ….

    Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past

    WW II started when UK and France declared war on Germany. Certainly the invasion of Poland, which was not unlike hundreds of precedents in European history, did not start a WW, as Poland was quickly defeated.

    As to genocide, I think you Communists are better familiar with that. Even Soviet archives reveal the Holohoax is a myth but that the Bolsheviks launched the systematic destruction of Russian Christians, with vastly more Christians murdered then is even alleged in the absurd Holohoax. Though Stalin did get in the last laugh, starting this slander against Germany, with Jews more than happy to perpetuate the myth. Reminds one of the Katlyn Forest Massacre …

    Read More
    • Replies: @Respect
    The holocaust existed , you western idiot , just an example of your german and ucranian friends

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babi_Yar


    you must be an ucranian idiot , or a polack idiot Katyn sucker , still worse than western idiots , are you taking Pervitin like you nazi masters ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. chris says:

    forgot to mention the truly great, Joe Sobran (http://www.sobran.com/)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  122. Respect says:
    @CalDre

    the USA , have done ” preventive ” attacks
     
    I wrote nothing of the sort, and it's quite contrary to my posting history. Talk about paranoid delusions ....

    Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past
     
    WW II started when UK and France declared war on Germany. Certainly the invasion of Poland, which was not unlike hundreds of precedents in European history, did not start a WW, as Poland was quickly defeated.

    As to genocide, I think you Communists are better familiar with that. Even Soviet archives reveal the Holohoax is a myth but that the Bolsheviks launched the systematic destruction of Russian Christians, with vastly more Christians murdered then is even alleged in the absurd Holohoax. Though Stalin did get in the last laugh, starting this slander against Germany, with Jews more than happy to perpetuate the myth. Reminds one of the Katlyn Forest Massacre ...

    The holocaust existed , you western idiot , just an example of your german and ucranian friends

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babi_Yar

    you must be an ucranian idiot , or a polack idiot Katyn sucker , still worse than western idiots , are you taking Pervitin like you nazi masters ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    The holocaust existed , you western idiot
     
    If you are referring to your Communist idols genocide of Christians, yes, it did. Wikipedia has a lot to say about Russian involvement in Ukraine and your hero Stalin's vast and unparalleled crimes against humanity, since this is your Bible, have a read of it.

    you must be an ucranian idiot , or a polack idiot Katyn sucker , still worse than western idiots , are you taking Pervitin like you nazi masters ?
     
    This kind of extreme hatred is exactly what characterizes Communists like you. If only your Stalin buddy were around to kill me, wouldn't that be grand?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Israel outdid himself. Excellent article. It was long time due to touch upon all this Jewish influence upon Russian revolutions and put it into real context. Andrei posts here were excellent in revealing and repulsing bs that I have to read non stop every day be it here , Russia insider and elsewhere. Agree with both of you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  124. mcohen says:
    @Anon
    Most weed’s been grown in grow houses, not outside for decades now. Now that weed’s legal taxed and certified, the profit will be less.

    But just 5o primo plants of high THC weed can bring a profit of $100,000 a year. The 99 legal medical marijuana plants can double the profit. It’s a lot of hard work but isn’t difficult to manage if you have a regular job. The electricity bill will be very high unless you have an electrician friend who will “adjust” the wiring for you. It’s also possible to mess with the water meter.

    The 99 legal medical plants can be grown in a 8 by 10 space even with the water light and electrical motors hooked up. The stripping and packaging can be done anywhere.

    If you don’t have a garage use a small bedroom next to a bathroom and do your own piping. You can save on electricity by building a just big enough box for the plants and grow lights If you are growing just a few plants for personal use all you need is a few pots, a grow light and you can manually water, fertilize and squirt pesticide in the bugs.

    I think the only people who grow weed outside are the illegal Mexicans who grow it in the national forests. But it’s vsry low quality because of lack of grow lights and bugs.

    Medical marijuana for pain is bogus. It really doesn’t break the contact between the site of the pain and the brain. Only the prescription pain killers do that. For lesser pain, aspirin Tylenol and muscle relaxers are as good or better as marijuana.

    The growers might do ok with legal marijuana. The certification, testing, and incredible taxes might, just might mean that no one will buy legal weed and just go on buying it from the illegal growers. Some liberal California politicians have proposed a 45 percent tax on legal weed.

    It’s probably possible to grow low THC hemp for paper cloth and things outside. But I really can’t see growing primo high THC weed outside.

    Don’t

    Bogart that joint my friend….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    If you ever need extra money go for it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. Respect says:
    @Anonymous
    Who would want to make a habit of being a loser?

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
     
    Or rather, who would want to be a habitual loser, other than the dupes of Rabbi Jesus?

    "But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil...But I say unto you, Love your enemies." -Schlomo on the Mount
     

    In life we all end up losers , getting old , dying , and nobody carries with him beyond the riches , diplomas , positions , land … he had in this life …..

    Don`t you think it is a big mistery ? you ,winner , you übermesch ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Cattle die, and kinsmen die,
    And so one dies oneself;
    One thing I know that never dies:
    The fame of a dead man's deeds.

    --Pre-Christian Norse poem

    Source: The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds
    http://archive.org/details/FameOfADeadMansDeeds_100

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. CalDre says:
    @Respect
    The holocaust existed , you western idiot , just an example of your german and ucranian friends

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babi_Yar


    you must be an ucranian idiot , or a polack idiot Katyn sucker , still worse than western idiots , are you taking Pervitin like you nazi masters ?

    The holocaust existed , you western idiot

    If you are referring to your Communist idols genocide of Christians, yes, it did. Wikipedia has a lot to say about Russian involvement in Ukraine and your hero Stalin’s vast and unparalleled crimes against humanity, since this is your Bible, have a read of it.

    you must be an ucranian idiot , or a polack idiot Katyn sucker , still worse than western idiots , are you taking Pervitin like you nazi masters ?

    This kind of extreme hatred is exactly what characterizes Communists like you. If only your Stalin buddy were around to kill me, wouldn’t that be grand?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. renfro says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Dr MacDonald makes no pretensions to being a historian or Russian studies scholar. His subject is Judaism as an enemy of the European peoples. He includes the Jewish influence on both Russian and American communism.
     
    Again, this is precisely my point--Dr. MacDonald cannot possibly make any sound judgements on "Jewish influence" on Russian "communism" precisely for the reasons of Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called "Russia Studies" field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia's 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you. It is a-historic and anti-scientific. In other words: wind doesn't blow because crowns of trees are moving, it is the other way around. But then again, generally Western "humanities" and policy fields have issues with causalities--the empirical evidence of this is overwhelming. This is one of the major reasons why the US finds herself where it is and why her decline continues and, in fact, accelerates.

    Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you.

    You are evidently reading the wrong American books or getting your opinion on this from what you see on blogs.
    I had to go dig out my old university world history book to check. What it says basically is the bad outcome of the Russia-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. And that by 1914 after Nicholas led his country into another war discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, and soldiers and the populace became war-weary.
    What kicked off the Revolution and caused Czar Nicholas to abdicate was the army joining striking workers demanding relief and reforms.

    So are you saying this is not accurate?

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s. So you have to depend on sources by people that may or may not have been on the ground during those past times or either may have their own basis. However I don’t see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds. Being Russian does not make you a historian on Russia. 5 years in the Soviet Coast Guard and now living in America also does not make you a Russian military expert. So if you have more and other qualifications list them and we might consider you more of an authority and tolerate your insults better.

    Andrei Martyanov
    Mr. Martyanov is a graduate of Caspian (Kirov) Naval Academy, class of 1985. Upon graduation he served on ships of the Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He currently resides in the United States

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s
     
    But don't you see? He "ha[s], of course, low Russian nobility lineage and Cossacks too" so he is born with knowledge of all Russian history and knows exactly what happened, more than anyone who was there, more than all the history books of anyone else.

    It is sadly a typical claim of Russians that nobody can write about Russian history than Russians, preferably Communist ones. In this they join their Jewish comrades, who also seek to monopolize discourse of Jewish history. At the same time, these folks also pretend to be world experts on all other history as well, particularly German and other Western history.

    It is at once evidence to even an idle observer that this ridiculous attempt to monopolize history are the ravings of liars.
    , @Andrei Martyanov

    However I don’t see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds.
     
    M.S. with specialization in Gyro-Inertial Navigational Complexes of Naval Strategic Missile Systems, specific types for Delta I-Delta II (pr. 667B-BD) Strategic Missile Submarines. Qualifications for tactical command of the Naval Infantry (Marines) units. But you wouldn't know what is VUS anyhow and what command-engineering stands for. Bachelor Degree in Military Sciences. Graduate thesis on Anti-Submarine Warfare operations with the focus on hostile diversionary forces operations. While in Coast Guard, which were known as Marine Units of Border Guards of KGB USSR--experience of different command levels on several types of ships, including service in the Staff of Separate Brigade of Escort Ships as flag specialist (F-1). Graduate of High Command Officer Courses. I can continue for a long time if you need my credentials and operational experience but, yes, I know a little bit more, just teeny-weeny more, than late Tom Clancy about Soviet and Russian Armed Forces maybe because I was educated as such? So, is it in a ballpark or you need in depth review of how weapon systems are integrated both on ships and ground? Or do you need the list of courses taught in Soviet/Russian naval academies--I may try by memory.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s.
     
    My bio clearly states that I was born in 1963 and am 55 years old.

    and tolerate your insults better.
     
    I insulted someone? News to me.
    , @Andrei Martyanov

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.
     
    So, it is obvious that you didn't read his Russian Question in The End of the XX Century, as well as most of his "geopolitical" and "historical" writing. If you would read that--you would have been amused how Solzhenitsyn, as one example of many, BSes public on the issue of two Russian naval squadrons in New York (Admiral Lesovsky) and San-Francisco (Admiral Popov) during US Civil War--this is just one of many examples of Solzhenitsyn's "credibility". Obviously, he is "credible" for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a "Jew controls everything"--it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials--I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people, who would never go public and state their position openly and take a stand. Such as Phil Giraldi, John Mearsheimer or Israel Shamir do. Obviously, you also didn't read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy. But never mind, although it is Thursday--I take a day off tomorrow and it is slow at work, so I have a little bit of time to hang around discussion threads and have fun.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. ohmy says:

    Israel Shamir says about today; there are fewer “critical thinkers”. Intelligent critics willing to discuss the Jewish question. He never addresses the reason for this. If he had, this article would be 100 words. Anyone of prominence who dares to address the problem is set upon by Bnai Brith and it’s many arms, labeled an anti-Semite, and if not arrested for hate speech the poor soul looses his job, never to be forgiven. Look at what is happening right now to Jeremy Corbin, or check out how many professional educators have lost positions, all because they dare to question Jewish history, or the racist state of Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Thilo Sarrazin, 'Deutschland schafft sich ab, Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen', München 2010
    argues that hardly anyone today can read an intelligent article of a few pages.
    He blames western education, proves his point by PISA statitiscs.
    Christopher Lasch, 'The Culture of Narcissism, American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations', 1979, 1980, London
    is even more negative about education.
    Varoufakis is of the opinion that since 1970 macro economics has not been taught anywhere in the world; the derivates disaster was possible because of model builders believing their own phantasies.
    There is no such thing in economics as 'absolute minimum value'.
    One can see here what 'discussion' nowadays is, in stead of formulating an argument a few URLs are copied
    , @Israel Shamir
    Fight against the established church of the realm had never been easy. In the Middle Ages, heretics were burned alive, now they are just branded 'antisemites'. People do not die, they just "lose positions". So the dissent is cheaper nowadays, and still it is less popular than in AD 2000.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Anonymous[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Respect
    In life we all end up losers , getting old , dying , and nobody carries with him beyond the riches , diplomas , positions , land ... he had in this life .....

    Don`t you think it is a big mistery ? you ,winner , you übermesch ?

    Cattle die, and kinsmen die,
    And so one dies oneself;
    One thing I know that never dies:
    The fame of a dead man’s deeds.

    –Pre-Christian Norse poem

    Source: The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds

    http://archive.org/details/FameOfADeadMansDeeds_100

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. CalDre says:
    @renfro

    Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you.
     
    You are evidently reading the wrong American books or getting your opinion on this from what you see on blogs.
    I had to go dig out my old university world history book to check. What it says basically is the bad outcome of the Russia-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. And that by 1914 after Nicholas led his country into another war discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, and soldiers and the populace became war-weary.
    What kicked off the Revolution and caused Czar Nicholas to abdicate was the army joining striking workers demanding relief and reforms.

    So are you saying this is not accurate?

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s. So you have to depend on sources by people that may or may not have been on the ground during those past times or either may have their own basis. However I don't see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds. Being Russian does not make you a historian on Russia. 5 years in the Soviet Coast Guard and now living in America also does not make you a Russian military expert. So if you have more and other qualifications list them and we might consider you more of an authority and tolerate your insults better.

    Andrei Martyanov
    Mr. Martyanov is a graduate of Caspian (Kirov) Naval Academy, class of 1985. Upon graduation he served on ships of the Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He currently resides in the United States

    if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s

    But don’t you see? He “ha[s], of course, low Russian nobility lineage and Cossacks too” so he is born with knowledge of all Russian history and knows exactly what happened, more than anyone who was there, more than all the history books of anyone else.

    It is sadly a typical claim of Russians that nobody can write about Russian history than Russians, preferably Communist ones. In this they join their Jewish comrades, who also seek to monopolize discourse of Jewish history. At the same time, these folks also pretend to be world experts on all other history as well, particularly German and other Western history.

    It is at once evidence to even an idle observer that this ridiculous attempt to monopolize history are the ravings of liars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Who would want to make a habit of being a loser?

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
     
    Or rather, who would want to be a habitual loser, other than the dupes of Rabbi Jesus?

    "But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil...But I say unto you, Love your enemies." -Schlomo on the Mount
     

    So you read it to know the enemy. The whole thing is pretty sick and horrible. Kill slay slay slay the enemy. The enemy was every other tribe the Hebrews encountered wasn’t it? Kill all the Egyptian babies, con a guy into marrying both the daughters in exchange for 14 years of slave labor, on and on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    The Hebrew exploits are Fake News fictions, not real history. Yet the worst of the Hebrew's Tanakh (Old Testament) is that the Jewish deity Jehovah despises the God that my northern European ancestors worshiped and that I worship today.

    But ye who forsake Jehovah, who forget my holy mountain, who prepare a table for God, and fill up mixed wine unto Meni. (Isaiah 65:11)
     
    European translations of the Jewmagic book conflate the Teutonic name God and the Jewish deity Jehovah that the Rabbi-followers worship, as if they're one and the same. They're not, if the Bible is correct.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @mcohen
    Don't

    Bogart that joint my friend....

    If you ever need extra money go for it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    Nah not for me.i am a straight down the line self employed hardworking tradesman.it is the one little bit of dignity that i have in this ever increasing upside down world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. @Andrei Martyanov

    Not one….they all died……
     
    Just last Fall we bid farewell to one of our dearest friends in the US, almost a relative by all metrics. She was 82, she smoked all her life prior to the event. In 1996 she had operation on her lung--cancer. 2017-1996=21 years. So, this is one already. This makes your, most likely BS statistics, flawed. But it is just me with my single anecdotal evidence. So one did recover, after all.

    How much of her lungs were removed and what was the rate of oxygen that she needed afterwards to stay alive? Did she enjoy life or was it like Ariel Sharon on life support for a few years? Did she go on smoking?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Did she enjoy life
     
    Very much so, for 21 years. Continued to sing in her choir, play mandolin and even dived at the age of 80, traveled a lot. Her issues later were with her heart and she died in sleep from heart attack. So, is it good enough for your statistical "analysis"? She quit smoking.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @Andrei Martyanov

    Not one….they all died……
     
    Just last Fall we bid farewell to one of our dearest friends in the US, almost a relative by all metrics. She was 82, she smoked all her life prior to the event. In 1996 she had operation on her lung--cancer. 2017-1996=21 years. So, this is one already. This makes your, most likely BS statistics, flawed. But it is just me with my single anecdotal evidence. So one did recover, after all.

    Some people survive shooting a bullet in their head. So much for bull shit statistics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Essence of the conflict!
    If somebody want know what is really going on, here it is.

    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2632.htm

    Title is a little bit bombastic, but thought is very factual.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  136. anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    So you read it to know the enemy. The whole thing is pretty sick and horrible. Kill slay slay slay the enemy. The enemy was every other tribe the Hebrews encountered wasn’t it? Kill all the Egyptian babies, con a guy into marrying both the daughters in exchange for 14 years of slave labor, on and on.

    The Hebrew exploits are Fake News fictions, not real history. Yet the worst of the Hebrew’s Tanakh (Old Testament) is that the Jewish deity Jehovah despises the God that my northern European ancestors worshiped and that I worship today.

    But ye who forsake Jehovah, who forget my holy mountain, who prepare a table for God, and fill up mixed wine unto Meni. (Isaiah 65:11)

    European translations of the Jewmagic book conflate the Teutonic name God and the Jewish deity Jehovah that the Rabbi-followers worship, as if they’re one and the same. They’re not, if the Bible is correct.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. People who experiment with cigarettes in the 9th grade trash their future. But kids who start smoking pot in the 9th grade often times do trash their future.

    …Like you, maybe. What are you 25 or so? Living at home. Never traveled to another country or held any sort of impressive job. Just tokin everyday while more and more of your friends drift away to careers and so on.

    Not everyone who starts smoking pot at the age of 15 is screwed, but half of them are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  138. @Andrei Martyanov

    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way
     
    In fact, his lineage was that of low-level nobility which absolutely precludes him being Jewish since Jews were verboten from any noble titles in Russia. Simple as that. Moreover, I am always fascinated by the fact of total disregard of, say, Maxim Gorky's (Peshkov) immense ideological influence and role in Russian Marxism, together with Savva Morozov's support of revolutionary movement.

    There were a number of Jews, several thousands, who were ennobled as Jews (without pretending to convert) in the Russian Empire. The Russian Empire, was not, contrary to Zionist propaganda, “anti-Semitic.” (Without Anti-Semitism there can be no Zionism, obviously, so it was invented, and planted by hired Journalists and through Psy-Ops like the Dreyfus affair and other such things.) This ennobling of ethnic and religious Jews was part of the normal imperial policy, just as there were Tatar Moslem nobles, Yusupov was one, and Lamaist Buddhist nobles, and Lutheran nobles and Catholic nobles. When you take people into the Empire, you make some of them nobles, particularly if they were important in their community before. This is normal in all empires.

    Lenin’s Grandfather Alexander Dimitrievich Blank (originally Israel or “Shrul” Moiseyevich Blank, he took the patronym Dimitrievich from his patron, Moiseyevich obviously would not do) had “converted” first to Lutheranism (his first papers said “converted” from Judaism) and then to Orthodoxy (so that the final civil ID papers said that he “converted” to Orthodoxy from Lutheranism). This was a common procedure for a certain type of person who was converting with ulterior motives. What does the Psalm say? “By way of deception you will make your war.” Lenin’s Great Grandfather Moisey Blank, or, Weiss, or Beliy, or “White” from Turkic Ak, which signified the Khazar religious noble caste (established in Lithuania when they moved there from Crimea in 1391), converted at an old age when his wife died. He wrote to the Tsar Nikolai I in 1835 to say he held off from converting earlier because she was religious and he humored her. Why was he writing to the Tsar in Yiddish? Maybe because he was a secret agent. Wasn’t Stalin originally a secret agent? (Speaking of names, Kara, which is “Black” or Schwar(t)z in Turkic denoted a Khazar military noble caste, while Kizl, that is, Red or, in Yiddish “Roth” signified a particular Shamanistic function. “Blue” or Blau, “Yellow” or Gelb, also have their Turkic meanings.)

    Marx “converted” to Lutheranism. Disraeli converted to Anglicanism. He wrote in the novel Coningsby that this had no harmful effects. Actually it had no effect at all, and he recommended it to all Jews. It made no difference at all! Do you think these conversions had any effect upon them whatsoever? Would they have any effect upon you? The Waves of conversions starting in in 1759 and 1772 were due to Jacob Frank, the successor follower of Shabbatai Zevi, the Spanish Jewish Antichrist in Turkey who converted to Islam in Constantinople in 1665. Those thousands who converted with Shabbatai Zevi in Turkey are the Doenmeh, who overthrew the Sultan and ran Turkey from 1908 until recently. Louis Brandeis was a Frankist. He did not convert but he kept an icon that his mother gave him of Jacob Frank’s daughter who was the female divinity in Frankism, the Shekinah. The Hassids also come from Shabbatai Zevi, but every Hassid group has its own divinity in their dynasty. Plenty to go around and more Hassid groups are being started all the time. And there are also pure Shabbatians, very few know who they are, unless they do something like make Jewish blessings on Shabbat over Shellfish while pretending to be Buddhists.

    Jacob Frank himself first converted to Islam and then converted to Catholicism (twice in two months. The second time in 1759 at the hand of the King of Poland). And 25,000 Jews converted with him and were ennobled by the Poles, and adopted in their families. That explains a great deal, doesn’t it? Jacob Frank then offered to the Russians to convert himself and his followers to Russian Orthodoxy. He did not do it, but many did. And now some do nothing but pretend anyway. See: “The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement, 1755-1816″ by Pavel Maciejko.

    Madeleine Albright’s parents converted to Catholicism, and she says she is an Episcopalian. She says she did not know that her parents converted. She only read it in the newspapers but, she said that finally explains to her why her cousins are Jewish. She always wondered. Does she strike you as a pukka Christian? Moses Maimonides converted to Islam in Fez. Then in Egypt he said, “Just kidding.” Some Jews have pretended to be Catholics for five hundred years. And then they suddenly discover they are… Jews. Happens all the time. They are called Marranos. Often with the name Cruz, Bonfante (or Belafonte) or Sottomayor, or Castro. In fact, when you get down to it, the Caribbean is mostly Marrano, even as far as Texas and New Mexico. An Israeli Court recently declared the Chuetas of Majorca to be Jews after five hundred years as being accepted as Catholics. They said they were Catholics but they only married among themselves, so… This can only be done if you only strictly marry among other Crypto Jews of course; if you marry outside, you blew it. It is considered to be a genetic thing by the Jews, some kind of holy seed business. But it is really a state of mind. Once its fundamental principles take over, namely “nothing is true, everything is permitted,” once this essential condition takes over the mind, it is very, very hard to change it. You can convert all you want. But very, very few can escape. You have received the mark of Cain.

    Lenin was not a “believing” Jew. How many Jews are believing? But he had a monkey on his back. You know that atheist Jews are the majority, and there are many, many more Jews than the official numbers. Nor were Lenin’s sisters believing Jews. But they believed they were Jews. One of Lenin’s sisters wrote to Stalin that it was time to declare to the world that Lenin was a Jew. It is in the archives. So the family thought they were Jews, even if you don’t think so. Trotsky certainly was also not a believing Jew. But he was a Jew nonetheless. You don’t have to speak Yiddish. Many Jews even honestly believe that they are not Jews. But they are Jews none the less. For example, if they believe in reincarnation. That is a giveaway.

    There is a lot of make believe in life. Have you noticed? Max Nordau said there are no British Jews, American Jews, or French Jews. There are only Jews who happen to live in America, in Britain, or France. This is elementary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. @Respect
    another western idiot , yea ,the yankees , the USA , have done " preventive " attacks against most of the nations on earth , the US does 50% of the military expenses of the world , the US
    has 1000 military occupation bases out of the USA , and the US has been in war for about 220 years out of its 242 years of existence .

    But it is " preventive " you know , all the endless US wars are " preventive " , of course , The US is a pacifist nation of course .

    and regarding Germany , you say " Nazi Germany’s greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat. " , well Germany was a respected nation till Hitler and the nazis started WW2 , now Germany can be a rich country but Germany is a morally cursed nation for her horrible nazi genocide past .

    Who made Chamberlain sign a treaty with Poland in May 1939 to go to war if Poland was attacked? (Which happened in September.) It was not Chamberlain’s idea or wish, nor that of the British people. The British people certainly did not want a war, and over Poland of all things, a nation brought back into existence by the Germans at the end of of World War II as a strategic measure against Russia. And World War II was completely un-necessary. Germany was correcting the depredations of Versailles. And even after the French and British started the war by invading Germany for a few miles, the Germans proposed peace. And who was at Versailles? In September 1939 The Poles pointed out to the British that the Soviets also attacked Poland, it was not just Germany that attacked Poland, but the British Government, for some reason, saw no reason to declare war on the Soviet Union. Did the British people want a war with Germany for Poland? On the face of it they did not. But Samuel Untermyer declared war on Germany in 1933. He started with Economic sanctions. Whose tactic is that? Whose war was it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @CalDre

    Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .
     
    Nobody is denying that. The question is whether the invasion was in preemptive self-defense. An example would have been Iraq attacking US troops as they were being amassed in the Kuwaiti desert.

    Stalin and his Red Horde was poised to invade Europe to try to conquer it all, and thereby the world, culminating in Lenin's Imperialist Strategy of world conquest. The evidence is overwhelming. Nazi Germany's greatest contribution to humankind was to respond to that existential threat.

    Hitler’s attack was defensive
    Bogdan Musial, ‘Kampfplatz Deutschland, Stalins Kriegspläne gegen den Westen’, Berlin 2008
    The book is based on Russian archives, already closed again

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @ohmy
    Israel Shamir says about today; there are fewer "critical thinkers". Intelligent critics willing to discuss the Jewish question. He never addresses the reason for this. If he had, this article would be 100 words. Anyone of prominence who dares to address the problem is set upon by Bnai Brith and it's many arms, labeled an anti-Semite, and if not arrested for hate speech the poor soul looses his job, never to be forgiven. Look at what is happening right now to Jeremy Corbin, or check out how many professional educators have lost positions, all because they dare to question Jewish history, or the racist state of Israel.

    Thilo Sarrazin, ‘Deutschland schafft sich ab, Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen’, München 2010
    argues that hardly anyone today can read an intelligent article of a few pages.
    He blames western education, proves his point by PISA statitiscs.
    Christopher Lasch, ‘The Culture of Narcissism, American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations’, 1979, 1980, London
    is even more negative about education.
    Varoufakis is of the opinion that since 1970 macro economics has not been taught anywhere in the world; the derivates disaster was possible because of model builders believing their own phantasies.
    There is no such thing in economics as ‘absolute minimum value’.
    One can see here what ‘discussion’ nowadays is, in stead of formulating an argument a few URLs are copied

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. @Kiza
    Yes I had very similar thoughts. However, the hate-tobacco is a global phenomenon and thus has a soft connection to the Southern US tobacco growers. For me, tobacco was more like test of mind control over the population, once the levers of influence tools were in the right hands, the so called banning brigade.

    As a never-smoker and a libertarian my first thought about tobacco has always been - put your head within a meter of a vehicle exhaust pipe in any city and check out what happens to your life expectanxy. At least the smokers breath a natural product and through a filter.

    One elementary societal rule is: ban things that are less important to avoid banning things which are more important but earn the rullers a tidy profit. Banning of fat when sugar was a much bigger health risk is a wonderful other example, with huge health impact over several generations.

    I don’t disagree with your approach in so far as you are endorsing Labor Senator Pat Kennely’s fondly quoted words “in any race in which Self Interest is running bet your short on him”. However I am not sure about your sugar v. fat example. I’ve been as reliable a faddish as most and also an observer of medical fashions and limitations. I don’t see any lobbying by sugar interests (including those who may have wanted to sweeten drinks with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners) as having more clout or reason to use it than producers of butter, full cream milk or ice cream, or fat on the hoof – not to mention producers of polyunsaturated spreads which were medically fashionable for decades until recently.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    This is the uncorrected version
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @Kiza
    Yes I had very similar thoughts. However, the hate-tobacco is a global phenomenon and thus has a soft connection to the Southern US tobacco growers. For me, tobacco was more like test of mind control over the population, once the levers of influence tools were in the right hands, the so called banning brigade.

    As a never-smoker and a libertarian my first thought about tobacco has always been - put your head within a meter of a vehicle exhaust pipe in any city and check out what happens to your life expectanxy. At least the smokers breath a natural product and through a filter.

    One elementary societal rule is: ban things that are less important to avoid banning things which are more important but earn the rullers a tidy profit. Banning of fat when sugar was a much bigger health risk is a wonderful other example, with huge health impact over several generations.

    I don’t disagree with your approach in so far as you are endorsing Labor Senator Pat Kennelly’s fondly quoted words “in any race in which Self Interest is running bet your shi8rt on him”. However I am not sure about your sugar v. fat example. I’ve been as reliably faddish as most and also an observer of medical fashions and limitations. I don’t see any lobbying by sugar interests (including those who may have wanted to sweeten drinks with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners) as having more clout or reason to use it than producers of butter, full cream milk or ice cream, or fat on the hoof – not to mention producers of polyunsaturated spreads which were medically fashionable for decades until recently.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. @Wizard of Oz
    I don't disagree with your approach in so far as you are endorsing Labor Senator Pat Kennely's fondly quoted words "in any race in which Self Interest is running bet your short on him". However I am not sure about your sugar v. fat example. I've been as reliable a faddish as most and also an observer of medical fashions and limitations. I don't see any lobbying by sugar interests (including those who may have wanted to sweeten drinks with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners) as having more clout or reason to use it than producers of butter, full cream milk or ice cream, or fat on the hoof - not to mention producers of polyunsaturated spreads which were medically fashionable for decades until recently.

    This is the uncorrected version

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @ohmy
    Israel Shamir says about today; there are fewer "critical thinkers". Intelligent critics willing to discuss the Jewish question. He never addresses the reason for this. If he had, this article would be 100 words. Anyone of prominence who dares to address the problem is set upon by Bnai Brith and it's many arms, labeled an anti-Semite, and if not arrested for hate speech the poor soul looses his job, never to be forgiven. Look at what is happening right now to Jeremy Corbin, or check out how many professional educators have lost positions, all because they dare to question Jewish history, or the racist state of Israel.

    Fight against the established church of the realm had never been easy. In the Middle Ages, heretics were burned alive, now they are just branded ‘antisemites’. People do not die, they just “lose positions”. So the dissent is cheaper nowadays, and still it is less popular than in AD 2000.

    Read More
    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    So the dissent is cheaper nowadays, and still it is less popular than in AD 2000.
     
    Bingo! Dissent also has to be very educated and here in the US we have a pathological case of ignorance of the outside world and its history thus making this "dissent", mostly confined to all kinds of discussion boards (such as this one), not having a chance in actual substantive discussion. Enough to take a look how Stephen Cohen destroys, calmly and with a great knowledge of the issue, a hysterical neocon prostitute Max Boot. A delight, really and how it is supposed to be done, but don't expect this from most (not all) people here.

    https://youtu.be/5RToPP-n6YU
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. I.M says:
    @CalDre

    Hey, sure–poor Jewish me for whom English is a second language, but you, obviously, have no comprehension of it at all.
     
    For me English is a third language, but yet, quite honestly, your comprehension problem is not with English, your problem is that you are being a dogmatic know-nothing. I hope you are not always like this - does your unjustified arrogance also reflect your understanding of military matters?

    So let's get to the point, shall we. The context of the thread was whether Jews had twice conquered or almost conquered Russia. the second time being in 1990s under Yeltsin. To which you replied that Berezovsky was an Orthodox Christian. But being Orthodox Christian in name does not make you not a Jew, nobody claimed he was a religious Jew (most Jews, certainly in the "West", are in fact atheists, even while maintaining the hyper tribalism of classic Judaism). He was a Jew by birth and in 1993 he claimed Israeli citizenship. So your distraction by pointing out that he apparently converted to Orthodox Christianity by undergoing some simple rituals doesn't mean much. From what I can tell from that lowlife's actions, he probably thought that was better for business, given that everyone in Russia was starting to realize the Jewish oligarchs were seizing control, a bit of diversion that "Cossaks" like you fall for like awed children.

    Apart from tribalism and identity, if you are so dumb as to think a professed Christian cannot be a religious Jew I suggest you study the term crypto-Jew (hint: it's a fake conversion for convenience). Did he attend a Russian Orthodox church in UK? Or was his "public conversion" the only connection? Did he even go through the catechism?

    As to your alleged "nobility lineage", nobody cares. And speaking Russian does not make you undisputed king of Russian history - in fact many Russians disagree with you and beside that I am sure you have opinions about histories of other peoples do, no? Being of the same ethnicity does not make you an expert (except only Jews can speak about Jewish history, oy vey).

    You answered indirectly you are not Jewish, and given your silence on the Communist question, you have also indirectly answered that.

    there was an excellent article (or two) on here about the overwhelming subversion of the catholic church by the same groups mentioned, i looked for it but couldn’t find it. I wonder if somebody could link to it again.

    It completely validates your point that such “conversions” are a standard operating procedure and tactic for centuries. It also gives a dramatic insight into the degree of the subversive capabilities of such groups, at a much earlier point in time, to the point where absolutely nothing can be ruled out. Such capabilities have only grown stronger and more refined since.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    I stumbled upon a paper ("Bolshevism: From Moses to Lenin") describing the Nazi's view of Jewish infiltration of Christianity, including Paul the Apostle, as well as Luther's role in enabling Jewry. It generally describes the alleged Jewish version of "embrace and extend".

    Not what you were looking for directly but ....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Vojkan says:
    @AaronB
    Israel Shamir, you are focusing on a political solution to a spiritual problem, like all the stupid materialist whites.

    If I was conspiracy minded, I'd say you're trying to deflect whites attention from what's wrong with them and focus on useless political issues instead :)

    White intellectuals create despair and apathy in their own people. Guys like James Thompson tell whites striving is useless and their fate is set in stone (genes), surrendering the field to Jews who know better. Guys like Steve Sailer tell whites pretty much the same thing. But these guys are low level people.

    Meanwhile, the spiritual and intellectual white elite are all Leftist - men and women of idealism, character, and high intelligence who see white culture as a desert of materialism and science and who turn to Jews as the only source of idealism they see around them, however twisted.

    A typical alt-right thought leader is a guy like Vox Day - who is of average intellect and low character.

    But these guys don't matter so much - what whites need to do is win back the high quality people whites, who are all Leftist, and convert them to their side.

    But as long as "white" culture stands for capitalism, science, materialism, and the like - high quality whites will continue joining the Left, however twisted and perverted it is.

    “High quality” whites don’t join the Left, the Left co-opts them. To be co-opted by the Left, you have to embrace its moral relativism and its dogmas. Being dogmatic is not what I consider being spiritual. Trying to win back “Leftist” whites is like trying to convince islamic radicals. Contradict any of their dogmas and you’re immediately labeled a fascist. Any debate with a Leftist inevitably sooner or later reaches the Godwin point and you have the n-word thrown at you.
    I don’t want to win any of those folks back. The fight is not about capitalism, science, or materialism. The foundation of modern leftism is Marxism and Marxism is materialist at its core. Marxist dialectical materialism is applied Hegelian dialectic idealism, it’s what applied mathematics are to theoretical mathematics.
    The fight is not there. The fight is for the younger generations and in preventing their indoctrination by the Left. That cannot be achieved by trying to prove that the Left is wrong, but by exposing ideas that are Right. And I really don’t care for the colour of skin, those ideas have to be equally appealing to whites and non-whites. This is not a racial fight, it is a fight for all human civilisations in all their real diversity as they have been built for thousands of years against a band of lunatics who want to end them and create a “new” Mankind. It is a fight for roots against spiritless globalism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    “High quality” whites don’t join the Left, the Left co-opts them.
     
    Small clarification--Western Left. There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left. But we may move even further--so called Western Left is not really Left, it is a brand assigned to it by people who practice faux-scholarship. Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol' liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation. The United States was a perfect nation to do so, it is the same as it is a perfect nation, as an example, for organizing Holocaust industry and selling it as a guilt medicine and use it as a coercion tool, the practice also imposed on war-torn Europe by its alleged "liberators". It is also a perfect country to subvert its foreign and defense policies because the United States doesn't know what REAL war is. Even rabid Russophobe Richard Pipes openly admitted it. In the end, United States never formed as a true nation. In many respects popular American 20th "history" of Russia is so consistently associated with "Jewishness" (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn't sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews. Especially against the background of once great country literally turning into the third world multicultural cloaca with grim or no prospects at all. Sad, especially when one looks at purely American phenomenon of a vast strata of Christian Zionists loyal to Israel--an exhibit A of America's failure to form as a cohesive nation.
    , @AaronB
    I see idealism on the Left. I see harsh materialism on the Right.

    The Right has no values - the Right is anti-black because blacks cause crime - a good practical concern, but if that's all you stand for, then you're just an average person concerned with day to day living and without any larger idealistic vision.

    In other words, you're not part of humanitys spiritual or intellectual elite - and history is made by these people, not you.

    The Right is - and always has been and will be - irrelevant. Christianity and Islam were the Left of their day.

    History is made by different factions of Leftists - that is, people with character and idealism who are concerned with more than just practical things - fighting it out between each other.

    When things change, it will not be because Steve Sailer pointed out for the thousandth time that blacks cause crime and that whites have higher IQs, or because Vox Day prayed to St Breivik, but because some internal faction within the Left will come up with an idealistic vision that is saner, healthier, and more inspiring than today's grotesquely perverted Left.

    The Right is always composed of the bottom half of humanity - either decent people who are just concerned with practical things, nothing wrong with such people but they are uninspiring, or people of no values and low moral character.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Seraphim says:
    @anonymous
    The Hebrew exploits are Fake News fictions, not real history. Yet the worst of the Hebrew's Tanakh (Old Testament) is that the Jewish deity Jehovah despises the God that my northern European ancestors worshiped and that I worship today.

    But ye who forsake Jehovah, who forget my holy mountain, who prepare a table for God, and fill up mixed wine unto Meni. (Isaiah 65:11)
     
    European translations of the Jewmagic book conflate the Teutonic name God and the Jewish deity Jehovah that the Rabbi-followers worship, as if they're one and the same. They're not, if the Bible is correct.

    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Ah, the Village Yidiot speaks. We wuz Jewkangs'n'sheeit!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. mcohen says:
    @Anon
    If you ever need extra money go for it.

    Nah not for me.i am a straight down the line self employed hardworking tradesman.it is the one little bit of dignity that i have in this ever increasing upside down world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Anonymous[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seraphim
    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.

    Ah, the Village Yidiot speaks. We wuz Jewkangs’n’sheeit!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @renfro

    Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you.
     
    You are evidently reading the wrong American books or getting your opinion on this from what you see on blogs.
    I had to go dig out my old university world history book to check. What it says basically is the bad outcome of the Russia-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. And that by 1914 after Nicholas led his country into another war discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, and soldiers and the populace became war-weary.
    What kicked off the Revolution and caused Czar Nicholas to abdicate was the army joining striking workers demanding relief and reforms.

    So are you saying this is not accurate?

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s. So you have to depend on sources by people that may or may not have been on the ground during those past times or either may have their own basis. However I don't see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds. Being Russian does not make you a historian on Russia. 5 years in the Soviet Coast Guard and now living in America also does not make you a Russian military expert. So if you have more and other qualifications list them and we might consider you more of an authority and tolerate your insults better.

    Andrei Martyanov
    Mr. Martyanov is a graduate of Caspian (Kirov) Naval Academy, class of 1985. Upon graduation he served on ships of the Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He currently resides in the United States

    However I don’t see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds.

    M.S. with specialization in Gyro-Inertial Navigational Complexes of Naval Strategic Missile Systems, specific types for Delta I-Delta II (pr. 667B-BD) Strategic Missile Submarines. Qualifications for tactical command of the Naval Infantry (Marines) units. But you wouldn’t know what is VUS anyhow and what command-engineering stands for. Bachelor Degree in Military Sciences. Graduate thesis on Anti-Submarine Warfare operations with the focus on hostile diversionary forces operations. While in Coast Guard, which were known as Marine Units of Border Guards of KGB USSR–experience of different command levels on several types of ships, including service in the Staff of Separate Brigade of Escort Ships as flag specialist (F-1). Graduate of High Command Officer Courses. I can continue for a long time if you need my credentials and operational experience but, yes, I know a little bit more, just teeny-weeny more, than late Tom Clancy about Soviet and Russian Armed Forces maybe because I was educated as such? So, is it in a ballpark or you need in depth review of how weapon systems are integrated both on ships and ground? Or do you need the list of courses taught in Soviet/Russian naval academies–I may try by memory.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s.

    My bio clearly states that I was born in 1963 and am 55 years old.

    and tolerate your insults better.

    I insulted someone? News to me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    Andrei,
    Hat tip! Enjoy your posts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. @ploni almoni
    How much of her lungs were removed and what was the rate of oxygen that she needed afterwards to stay alive? Did she enjoy life or was it like Ariel Sharon on life support for a few years? Did she go on smoking?

    Did she enjoy life

    Very much so, for 21 years. Continued to sing in her choir, play mandolin and even dived at the age of 80, traveled a lot. Her issues later were with her heart and she died in sleep from heart attack. So, is it good enough for your statistical “analysis”? She quit smoking.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    A person who sings in a choir after lung cancer is a miracle. Or make believe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @renfro

    Russian history of the 20th century being nothing more than Solzhenitsified caricature. It was my both human and academic position for years now, and with each day I find more and more evidence in support of it, that the so called “Russia Studies” field in the US is generally dead because it completely and blatantly disregards main driving forces behind Russia’s 20th century history and turns Russian history in nothing more than Disney cartoon about palace intrigue by Jews, Bolsheviks, Evil, what have you.
     
    You are evidently reading the wrong American books or getting your opinion on this from what you see on blogs.
    I had to go dig out my old university world history book to check. What it says basically is the bad outcome of the Russia-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. And that by 1914 after Nicholas led his country into another war discontent in Russia grew as food became scarce, and soldiers and the populace became war-weary.
    What kicked off the Revolution and caused Czar Nicholas to abdicate was the army joining striking workers demanding relief and reforms.

    So are you saying this is not accurate?

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s. So you have to depend on sources by people that may or may not have been on the ground during those past times or either may have their own basis. However I don't see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds. Being Russian does not make you a historian on Russia. 5 years in the Soviet Coast Guard and now living in America also does not make you a Russian military expert. So if you have more and other qualifications list them and we might consider you more of an authority and tolerate your insults better.

    Andrei Martyanov
    Mr. Martyanov is a graduate of Caspian (Kirov) Naval Academy, class of 1985. Upon graduation he served on ships of the Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He currently resides in the United States

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.

    So, it is obvious that you didn’t read his Russian Question in The End of the XX Century, as well as most of his “geopolitical” and “historical” writing. If you would read that–you would have been amused how Solzhenitsyn, as one example of many, BSes public on the issue of two Russian naval squadrons in New York (Admiral Lesovsky) and San-Francisco (Admiral Popov) during US Civil War–this is just one of many examples of Solzhenitsyn’s “credibility”. Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people, who would never go public and state their position openly and take a stand. Such as Phil Giraldi, John Mearsheimer or Israel Shamir do. Obviously, you also didn’t read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy. But never mind, although it is Thursday–I take a day off tomorrow and it is slow at work, so I have a little bit of time to hang around discussion threads and have fun.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people,
     
    I'd remark 'touché' but that doesn't quite seem to do full justice. That entire paragraph needs to precede any and all posts from these blowhards as a sort of a disclosure to readers.
    , @renfro

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything
     
    Ah....but that is not what Solzhenitsyn said or wrote. He wrote 200 Years to set the record straight about e.v.e.r.y.o.n.e involved as the Jews ,as usual , claimed they were innocent and victims in the revolution. But he did not absolve all the Russians themselves for their part. He did claim that many perpetrators 'were not Russian' and in that he was referring to the Jews.
    And your attacks on Solzhenitsyn and other recognized writers on Russia is what I mean about your insults to others and to the board---you insist you are a better authority , insult others who question you.....and I see no basis for your claim to authority.

    Obviously, you also didn’t read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy.
     
    Yes, I saw you wrote that about Israel. And I have agreed with some things you write about Russia vr the US.

    HOWEVER ...you are also not giving us anything about Russian naval capabilities that we cant get from FAS or the releases of George Fedoroff, the Russia Senior Intelligence Officer. at the Office of Naval Intelligence. You want us to believe that you as a Russian working in a aerospace company lab have better intel straight from Russian sources than Fedoroff has?
    In your comments it appears you are getting some of your info from these US sources.

    Lastly , what undermines your authority claim is your very obvious dislike of America and Americans----we wonder why you even live here with that resentment of us and why if you are so knowledgeable and expert you aren't in Russa giving them the benefit of your brilliance. Or why you are not working for the US Office of Naval Intelligence. They are always hiring Russia experts. Your disgust with America , although I share some of it , makes your a non objective source.
    You are basically trying to be a big Russian frog authority in a very very small sector of online blogs.

    , @CalDre

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks)
     
    Actually the "Jews control everything" crows is the brave one, for speaking the truth (though it's not that extreme) will get you in lots of trouble.

    The real cowards are those who refuse to put blame where it belongs, and thus get the blessings of the nefarious psychopaths in charge, of which you seem to be a committed member. Yes "brave" you writes the most obvious truisms about Israeli control of US ME foreign policy but frankly a coward stops at that most obvious and undeniable point that is actually mainstream. And this is not just as a matter of principle and truth, about which you obviously care not one iota, but also about surviving and winning the current advance phase of war against humanity by the nefarious psychopaths in charge.

    Again, read the Protocols, if you have the courage, and compare against reality. You will see that they accurately predict, decades in advance, exactly what Solzhenitsyn wrote. It is not those who are anti-Semitic but those who are Bolshevik enablers who are dumb as rocks, ignorant, lazy and cowards. They refuse to read works like Mein Kampf and Protocols because their cowardice coerces them to remain ignorant. They repeat the Holohoax because they deeply fear being labeled a "denier" and risking their emoluments of the Empire for conforming and obeying, without ever bothering to research it because, you know, how can war propaganda be questioned?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. @Israel Shamir
    Fight against the established church of the realm had never been easy. In the Middle Ages, heretics were burned alive, now they are just branded 'antisemites'. People do not die, they just "lose positions". So the dissent is cheaper nowadays, and still it is less popular than in AD 2000.

    So the dissent is cheaper nowadays, and still it is less popular than in AD 2000.

    Bingo! Dissent also has to be very educated and here in the US we have a pathological case of ignorance of the outside world and its history thus making this “dissent”, mostly confined to all kinds of discussion boards (such as this one), not having a chance in actual substantive discussion. Enough to take a look how Stephen Cohen destroys, calmly and with a great knowledge of the issue, a hysterical neocon prostitute Max Boot. A delight, really and how it is supposed to be done, but don’t expect this from most (not all) people here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Vojkan
    "High quality" whites don't join the Left, the Left co-opts them. To be co-opted by the Left, you have to embrace its moral relativism and its dogmas. Being dogmatic is not what I consider being spiritual. Trying to win back "Leftist" whites is like trying to convince islamic radicals. Contradict any of their dogmas and you're immediately labeled a fascist. Any debate with a Leftist inevitably sooner or later reaches the Godwin point and you have the n-word thrown at you.
    I don't want to win any of those folks back. The fight is not about capitalism, science, or materialism. The foundation of modern leftism is Marxism and Marxism is materialist at its core. Marxist dialectical materialism is applied Hegelian dialectic idealism, it's what applied mathematics are to theoretical mathematics.
    The fight is not there. The fight is for the younger generations and in preventing their indoctrination by the Left. That cannot be achieved by trying to prove that the Left is wrong, but by exposing ideas that are Right. And I really don't care for the colour of skin, those ideas have to be equally appealing to whites and non-whites. This is not a racial fight, it is a fight for all human civilisations in all their real diversity as they have been built for thousands of years against a band of lunatics who want to end them and create a "new" Mankind. It is a fight for roots against spiritless globalism.

    “High quality” whites don’t join the Left, the Left co-opts them.

    Small clarification–Western Left. There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left. But we may move even further–so called Western Left is not really Left, it is a brand assigned to it by people who practice faux-scholarship. Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol’ liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation. The United States was a perfect nation to do so, it is the same as it is a perfect nation, as an example, for organizing Holocaust industry and selling it as a guilt medicine and use it as a coercion tool, the practice also imposed on war-torn Europe by its alleged “liberators”. It is also a perfect country to subvert its foreign and defense policies because the United States doesn’t know what REAL war is. Even rabid Russophobe Richard Pipes openly admitted it. In the end, United States never formed as a true nation. In many respects popular American 20th “history” of Russia is so consistently associated with “Jewishness” (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn’t sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews. Especially against the background of once great country literally turning into the third world multicultural cloaca with grim or no prospects at all. Sad, especially when one looks at purely American phenomenon of a vast strata of Christian Zionists loyal to Israel–an exhibit A of America’s failure to form as a cohesive nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    As in so many things, it is, really, quite remarkable how the Protocols are so absolutely prescient about virtually everything. Not only in what will happen in the future, hundreds of years from when these "obvious forgeries" were found, but also who is behind them all (hint: they belong to a highly tribalistic group or their agents).

    Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol’ liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation.
     
    In history there have been three primary unifying forces: family, clan/tribe/nation, and religion. As is made clear in the Communist Manifestos, the goal is to destroy all three - and, boy, are Liberals doing an unbelievably fantastic job of that! Open borders, feminism, abortion, atheism, etc. The goal of Communism is to revert all humans to an undifferentiated state and form their minds as Communists deem fit - all those who cannot be totally controlled are, as the Bolsheviks and Stalinists and Maoists and other Communists demonstrated, to be "liquidated". It is basically the world of Big Brother in "1984" - they form their human subjects as an artist forms clay.

    As to atomization and dissension, my guess is you have never actually read the Protocols, due to the self-censorship and cowardice associated with Communists. I dare you to open your mind and read them objectively. If they are not an actual blueprint for the future (which has since largely been implemented, both in Bolshevism and Western Liberalism, which is to lead to the former), please, do explain which (main) parts of it are inaccurate (of course over a 150-year span there will be some (minor) strategic and tactical adjustments in this eternal "war").

    , @gmachine1729
    Lol I only really learned of (in English) "cultural Marxism" and its political connotation in America maybe the past year.

    There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left.
     
    Thank God I learned to read Chinese unlike 99+% of Chinese immigrant kids, so that I could expose myself to the Chinese Left. What do I think of the Western Left? Let me quote a guy with BS in Hebrew from Beijing University and PhD in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard.

    靠殖民地和排他移民起家的国家好像不大可能不走到假左翼和极端右翼成为社会主流的社会。美加澳,还有某中东国家。
     
    Translation:

    Nations founded on colonialism and dispossession seem to be unable to not go to a fusion of pseudo left and far right as the social mainstream. America, Canada, Australia, and some Middle Eastern country.
     
    I also promoted you on my site: https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/from-unz-review/.

    Finally, you will probably be interested to hear that a Chinese physicist who appears a genuine expert on Jewish/Israeli history believes that Israel will collapse alongside its dependency America within 30 years time, much out of an inevitable devaluation of the dollar. Hmm, the number of smart people who are VERY pessimistic about the prospect of the West may be much higher than I expected. For more context, see https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/more-in-chinese/.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Sam Shama says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    However I don’t see anything in your bio that indicates any professional or educational creds.
     
    M.S. with specialization in Gyro-Inertial Navigational Complexes of Naval Strategic Missile Systems, specific types for Delta I-Delta II (pr. 667B-BD) Strategic Missile Submarines. Qualifications for tactical command of the Naval Infantry (Marines) units. But you wouldn't know what is VUS anyhow and what command-engineering stands for. Bachelor Degree in Military Sciences. Graduate thesis on Anti-Submarine Warfare operations with the focus on hostile diversionary forces operations. While in Coast Guard, which were known as Marine Units of Border Guards of KGB USSR--experience of different command levels on several types of ships, including service in the Staff of Separate Brigade of Escort Ships as flag specialist (F-1). Graduate of High Command Officer Courses. I can continue for a long time if you need my credentials and operational experience but, yes, I know a little bit more, just teeny-weeny more, than late Tom Clancy about Soviet and Russian Armed Forces maybe because I was educated as such? So, is it in a ballpark or you need in depth review of how weapon systems are integrated both on ships and ground? Or do you need the list of courses taught in Soviet/Russian naval academies--I may try by memory.

    According to your bio, if you graduated in 1985 you were likely born in the 1960s.
     
    My bio clearly states that I was born in 1963 and am 55 years old.

    and tolerate your insults better.
     
    I insulted someone? News to me.

    Andrei,
    Hat tip! Enjoy your posts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Sam Shama says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.
     
    So, it is obvious that you didn't read his Russian Question in The End of the XX Century, as well as most of his "geopolitical" and "historical" writing. If you would read that--you would have been amused how Solzhenitsyn, as one example of many, BSes public on the issue of two Russian naval squadrons in New York (Admiral Lesovsky) and San-Francisco (Admiral Popov) during US Civil War--this is just one of many examples of Solzhenitsyn's "credibility". Obviously, he is "credible" for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a "Jew controls everything"--it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials--I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people, who would never go public and state their position openly and take a stand. Such as Phil Giraldi, John Mearsheimer or Israel Shamir do. Obviously, you also didn't read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy. But never mind, although it is Thursday--I take a day off tomorrow and it is slow at work, so I have a little bit of time to hang around discussion threads and have fun.

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people,

    I’d remark ‘touché’ but that doesn’t quite seem to do full justice. That entire paragraph needs to precede any and all posts from these blowhards as a sort of a disclosure to readers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    as a sort of a disclosure to readers.
     
    My favorite military truism is that War (conflict, in general) is a very democratic affair--the enemy has the say too. It is like in life, one has to be aware not only about others but primarily of him(her) self, with own weaknesses, failures and such. In the end, the existential Russian 19th century intelligentsia questions: What To Do and Who Is Guilty matters a great deal. We observe today an utter (self)destruction of what used to be Anglo-Saxon (dominated) world. It is a drawn out process but it is short in historic terms. It started in 1939 in earnest and these were not Jews who did it, they sure helped, the seeds of own destruction were carried within liberalism and financial capitalism its spawned. Same goes for hysterical Russophobia which fits WASP "elites" just fine--all that are symptoms, not causes. But then again, Russian is a new Jew today--it is well-known that Russians control everything in America, from sewer and garbage disposal to media and POTUS. Damn, Russians are good. Suck on it, Jews!;-)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. AaronB says:
    @Vojkan
    "High quality" whites don't join the Left, the Left co-opts them. To be co-opted by the Left, you have to embrace its moral relativism and its dogmas. Being dogmatic is not what I consider being spiritual. Trying to win back "Leftist" whites is like trying to convince islamic radicals. Contradict any of their dogmas and you're immediately labeled a fascist. Any debate with a Leftist inevitably sooner or later reaches the Godwin point and you have the n-word thrown at you.
    I don't want to win any of those folks back. The fight is not about capitalism, science, or materialism. The foundation of modern leftism is Marxism and Marxism is materialist at its core. Marxist dialectical materialism is applied Hegelian dialectic idealism, it's what applied mathematics are to theoretical mathematics.
    The fight is not there. The fight is for the younger generations and in preventing their indoctrination by the Left. That cannot be achieved by trying to prove that the Left is wrong, but by exposing ideas that are Right. And I really don't care for the colour of skin, those ideas have to be equally appealing to whites and non-whites. This is not a racial fight, it is a fight for all human civilisations in all their real diversity as they have been built for thousands of years against a band of lunatics who want to end them and create a "new" Mankind. It is a fight for roots against spiritless globalism.

    I see idealism on the Left. I see harsh materialism on the Right.

    The Right has no values – the Right is anti-black because blacks cause crime – a good practical concern, but if that’s all you stand for, then you’re just an average person concerned with day to day living and without any larger idealistic vision.

    In other words, you’re not part of humanitys spiritual or intellectual elite – and history is made by these people, not you.

    The Right is – and always has been and will be – irrelevant. Christianity and Islam were the Left of their day.

    History is made by different factions of Leftists – that is, people with character and idealism who are concerned with more than just practical things – fighting it out between each other.

    When things change, it will not be because Steve Sailer pointed out for the thousandth time that blacks cause crime and that whites have higher IQs, or because Vox Day prayed to St Breivik, but because some internal faction within the Left will come up with an idealistic vision that is saner, healthier, and more inspiring than today’s grotesquely perverted Left.

    The Right is always composed of the bottom half of humanity – either decent people who are just concerned with practical things, nothing wrong with such people but they are uninspiring, or people of no values and low moral character.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. @Sam Shama

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people,
     
    I'd remark 'touché' but that doesn't quite seem to do full justice. That entire paragraph needs to precede any and all posts from these blowhards as a sort of a disclosure to readers.

    as a sort of a disclosure to readers.

    My favorite military truism is that War (conflict, in general) is a very democratic affair–the enemy has the say too. It is like in life, one has to be aware not only about others but primarily of him(her) self, with own weaknesses, failures and such. In the end, the existential Russian 19th century intelligentsia questions: What To Do and Who Is Guilty matters a great deal. We observe today an utter (self)destruction of what used to be Anglo-Saxon (dominated) world. It is a drawn out process but it is short in historic terms. It started in 1939 in earnest and these were not Jews who did it, they sure helped, the seeds of own destruction were carried within liberalism and financial capitalism its spawned. Same goes for hysterical Russophobia which fits WASP “elites” just fine–all that are symptoms, not causes. But then again, Russian is a new Jew today–it is well-known that Russians control everything in America, from sewer and garbage disposal to media and POTUS. Damn, Russians are good. Suck on it, Jews!;-)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. @Andrei Martyanov

    Did she enjoy life
     
    Very much so, for 21 years. Continued to sing in her choir, play mandolin and even dived at the age of 80, traveled a lot. Her issues later were with her heart and she died in sleep from heart attack. So, is it good enough for your statistical "analysis"? She quit smoking.

    A person who sings in a choir after lung cancer is a miracle. Or make believe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Or make believe.
     
    http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/peninsuladailynews/obituary.aspx?pid=186638508

    Her choir sang on her funeral. We were there. Read this:


    Win loved to perform and continued singing and playing the mandolin right into her final days.
     
    You are despicable troll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. @ploni almoni
    A person who sings in a choir after lung cancer is a miracle. Or make believe.

    Or make believe.

    http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/peninsuladailynews/obituary.aspx?pid=186638508

    Her choir sang on her funeral. We were there. Read this:

    Win loved to perform and continued singing and playing the mandolin right into her final days.

    You are despicable troll.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. renfro says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.
     
    So, it is obvious that you didn't read his Russian Question in The End of the XX Century, as well as most of his "geopolitical" and "historical" writing. If you would read that--you would have been amused how Solzhenitsyn, as one example of many, BSes public on the issue of two Russian naval squadrons in New York (Admiral Lesovsky) and San-Francisco (Admiral Popov) during US Civil War--this is just one of many examples of Solzhenitsyn's "credibility". Obviously, he is "credible" for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a "Jew controls everything"--it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials--I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people, who would never go public and state their position openly and take a stand. Such as Phil Giraldi, John Mearsheimer or Israel Shamir do. Obviously, you also didn't read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy. But never mind, although it is Thursday--I take a day off tomorrow and it is slow at work, so I have a little bit of time to hang around discussion threads and have fun.

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything

    Ah….but that is not what Solzhenitsyn said or wrote. He wrote 200 Years to set the record straight about e.v.e.r.y.o.n.e involved as the Jews ,as usual , claimed they were innocent and victims in the revolution. But he did not absolve all the Russians themselves for their part. He did claim that many perpetrators ‘were not Russian’ and in that he was referring to the Jews.
    And your attacks on Solzhenitsyn and other recognized writers on Russia is what I mean about your insults to others and to the board—you insist you are a better authority , insult others who question you…..and I see no basis for your claim to authority.

    Obviously, you also didn’t read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy.

    Yes, I saw you wrote that about Israel. And I have agreed with some things you write about Russia vr the US.

    HOWEVER …you are also not giving us anything about Russian naval capabilities that we cant get from FAS or the releases of George Fedoroff, the Russia Senior Intelligence Officer. at the Office of Naval Intelligence. You want us to believe that you as a Russian working in a aerospace company lab have better intel straight from Russian sources than Fedoroff has?
    In your comments it appears you are getting some of your info from these US sources.

    Lastly , what undermines your authority claim is your very obvious dislike of America and Americans—-we wonder why you even live here with that resentment of us and why if you are so knowledgeable and expert you aren’t in Russa giving them the benefit of your brilliance. Or why you are not working for the US Office of Naval Intelligence. They are always hiring Russia experts. Your disgust with America , although I share some of it , makes your a non objective source.
    You are basically trying to be a big Russian frog authority in a very very small sector of online blogs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    You want us to believe that you as a Russian working in a aerospace company lab have better intel straight from Russian sources than Fedoroff has?
     
    I don't want you to believe anything. Or, rather--be my guest, feel free to believe anything you want.
    , @Seraphim
    Being a specialist in one field does not automatically mean that you become one in other fields. Martyanov is an excellent military specialist. Unfortunately he is deficient at history. It is not entirely his fault. His views on the 'History' of the Revolution in Russia were moulded by the 'History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks): Short Course'. Hard to cast them off when in America the history of Russia in general and of the Revolution in particular is viewed through the same lenses. Tsarism bad, Tsar's ineptitude, Russia backward country, people good. No Jews in the picture other than victims of Russian antisemitism. No American Jewish bankers behind, revolution an exclusive Russian affair, we Russians did everything. Solzhenitsyn bad. The worse actually being a critic of both Communism and Western society and an antisemite to boot. His books are on the Index of Forbidden Books of the Russophobia.
    In the climate of demented Russophobia which views Russia's history as a 'Solzhenitsified caricature' endorsed by Putin, it is simply prudence to show that you don't read banned authors, so is doubtful that he ever read anything that he actually wrote.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Josecanuc says:
    @Aramis Kretzer

    And it is to their undying shame (and to the detriment of this country) that the US Congress has abdicated its constitutional authority.
     
    Inasmuch as Congress is composed of wealth-seeking curs operating from a platform of pecuniary gain, I can't see as how they have "abdicated" authority they had no intention of applying. They are scoundrels, plain and simple. Who expects scoundrels to carry out Constitutional responsibilities?

    “The knaves (scoundrels) are the cleaverest; they pretend they know it all, the fools believe them, so they govern.” John Edward Trewlyan, 1821

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. CalDre says:
    @I.M
    there was an excellent article (or two) on here about the overwhelming subversion of the catholic church by the same groups mentioned, i looked for it but couldn't find it. I wonder if somebody could link to it again.

    It completely validates your point that such "conversions" are a standard operating procedure and tactic for centuries. It also gives a dramatic insight into the degree of the subversive capabilities of such groups, at a much earlier point in time, to the point where absolutely nothing can be ruled out. Such capabilities have only grown stronger and more refined since.

    I stumbled upon a paper (“Bolshevism: From Moses to Lenin“) describing the Nazi’s view of Jewish infiltration of Christianity, including Paul the Apostle, as well as Luther’s role in enabling Jewry. It generally describes the alleged Jewish version of “embrace and extend”.

    Not what you were looking for directly but ….

    Read More
    • Replies: @I.M
    Thank you for that!

    Luckily i managed to find the article itself.

    http://www.unz.com/article/review-the-jesuit-order-as-a-synagogue-of-jews/

    Anybody referencing any kind of 'conversion' should read this first to put such things in their proper context. The fact that Berezovsky converted is proof towards his subversive activities on behalf of that group, not against.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. CalDre says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    “High quality” whites don’t join the Left, the Left co-opts them.
     
    Small clarification--Western Left. There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left. But we may move even further--so called Western Left is not really Left, it is a brand assigned to it by people who practice faux-scholarship. Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol' liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation. The United States was a perfect nation to do so, it is the same as it is a perfect nation, as an example, for organizing Holocaust industry and selling it as a guilt medicine and use it as a coercion tool, the practice also imposed on war-torn Europe by its alleged "liberators". It is also a perfect country to subvert its foreign and defense policies because the United States doesn't know what REAL war is. Even rabid Russophobe Richard Pipes openly admitted it. In the end, United States never formed as a true nation. In many respects popular American 20th "history" of Russia is so consistently associated with "Jewishness" (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn't sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews. Especially against the background of once great country literally turning into the third world multicultural cloaca with grim or no prospects at all. Sad, especially when one looks at purely American phenomenon of a vast strata of Christian Zionists loyal to Israel--an exhibit A of America's failure to form as a cohesive nation.

    As in so many things, it is, really, quite remarkable how the Protocols are so absolutely prescient about virtually everything. Not only in what will happen in the future, hundreds of years from when these “obvious forgeries” were found, but also who is behind them all (hint: they belong to a highly tribalistic group or their agents).

    Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol’ liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation.

    In history there have been three primary unifying forces: family, clan/tribe/nation, and religion. As is made clear in the Communist Manifestos, the goal is to destroy all three – and, boy, are Liberals doing an unbelievably fantastic job of that! Open borders, feminism, abortion, atheism, etc. The goal of Communism is to revert all humans to an undifferentiated state and form their minds as Communists deem fit – all those who cannot be totally controlled are, as the Bolsheviks and Stalinists and Maoists and other Communists demonstrated, to be “liquidated”. It is basically the world of Big Brother in “1984″ – they form their human subjects as an artist forms clay.

    As to atomization and dissension, my guess is you have never actually read the Protocols, due to the self-censorship and cowardice associated with Communists. I dare you to open your mind and read them objectively. If they are not an actual blueprint for the future (which has since largely been implemented, both in Bolshevism and Western Liberalism, which is to lead to the former), please, do explain which (main) parts of it are inaccurate (of course over a 150-year span there will be some (minor) strategic and tactical adjustments in this eternal “war”).

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Jesus was the original Bolshevist, openly advocating to destroy family and nation, e.g., Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30.

    [Jesus] rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties…The motive force behind the purity and power of this complete negation is ecstatic inspiration and enthusiastic hope of a new world. Hence his passionate attack upon everything that exists. Everything may be destroyed because God in His omnipotence will rebuild the future order…The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism. The Bolshevists, too, wish to destroy everything that exists because they regard it as hopelessly bad.

    Ludwig von Mises
    Socialism, p. 413
     
    So it's not surprising that the followers of Bolshevist Jesus were the original Communists.

    "Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them...and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need." Acts 4:32-35
     
    Bolshie Jesus is not the anti-communists friend.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. @renfro

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything
     
    Ah....but that is not what Solzhenitsyn said or wrote. He wrote 200 Years to set the record straight about e.v.e.r.y.o.n.e involved as the Jews ,as usual , claimed they were innocent and victims in the revolution. But he did not absolve all the Russians themselves for their part. He did claim that many perpetrators 'were not Russian' and in that he was referring to the Jews.
    And your attacks on Solzhenitsyn and other recognized writers on Russia is what I mean about your insults to others and to the board---you insist you are a better authority , insult others who question you.....and I see no basis for your claim to authority.

    Obviously, you also didn’t read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy.
     
    Yes, I saw you wrote that about Israel. And I have agreed with some things you write about Russia vr the US.

    HOWEVER ...you are also not giving us anything about Russian naval capabilities that we cant get from FAS or the releases of George Fedoroff, the Russia Senior Intelligence Officer. at the Office of Naval Intelligence. You want us to believe that you as a Russian working in a aerospace company lab have better intel straight from Russian sources than Fedoroff has?
    In your comments it appears you are getting some of your info from these US sources.

    Lastly , what undermines your authority claim is your very obvious dislike of America and Americans----we wonder why you even live here with that resentment of us and why if you are so knowledgeable and expert you aren't in Russa giving them the benefit of your brilliance. Or why you are not working for the US Office of Naval Intelligence. They are always hiring Russia experts. Your disgust with America , although I share some of it , makes your a non objective source.
    You are basically trying to be a big Russian frog authority in a very very small sector of online blogs.

    You want us to believe that you as a Russian working in a aerospace company lab have better intel straight from Russian sources than Fedoroff has?

    I don’t want you to believe anything. Or, rather–be my guest, feel free to believe anything you want.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. CalDre says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Now, the Jews that jumped on the Bolshevik bandwagon is another matter .
    Solzhenitsyn wrote what he saw about the mainly Polish Jews who had been annexed into Russia and since he was there and saw and lived it I think he is more creditable than many others.
     
    So, it is obvious that you didn't read his Russian Question in The End of the XX Century, as well as most of his "geopolitical" and "historical" writing. If you would read that--you would have been amused how Solzhenitsyn, as one example of many, BSes public on the issue of two Russian naval squadrons in New York (Admiral Lesovsky) and San-Francisco (Admiral Popov) during US Civil War--this is just one of many examples of Solzhenitsyn's "credibility". Obviously, he is "credible" for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a "Jew controls everything"--it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials--I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks) crowd of armchair radicals who are afflicted with an incredible complex of inferiority (and cowardice, I may add) and instead of educating themselves on real history, waste their time trying to avoid understanding how they got shafted and outsmarted by Jews by addressing their OWN issues of being dumb and cowardly, thus resorting to following all kinds of BS concepts, instead of studying. It is sort of a mental therapy for people, who would never go public and state their position openly and take a stand. Such as Phil Giraldi, John Mearsheimer or Israel Shamir do. Obviously, you also didn't read my writings and the newest book where I also write about Israel effectively controlling US foreign policy. But never mind, although it is Thursday--I take a day off tomorrow and it is slow at work, so I have a little bit of time to hang around discussion threads and have fun.

    Obviously, he is “credible” for a specific category of public whose world view is based on a “Jew controls everything”–it is mostly badly educated (not to be mistaken with credentials–I knew some Ph.Ds who were dumb as fvcks)

    Actually the “Jews control everything” crows is the brave one, for speaking the truth (though it’s not that extreme) will get you in lots of trouble.

    The real cowards are those who refuse to put blame where it belongs, and thus get the blessings of the nefarious psychopaths in charge, of which you seem to be a committed member. Yes “brave” you writes the most obvious truisms about Israeli control of US ME foreign policy but frankly a coward stops at that most obvious and undeniable point that is actually mainstream. And this is not just as a matter of principle and truth, about which you obviously care not one iota, but also about surviving and winning the current advance phase of war against humanity by the nefarious psychopaths in charge.

    Again, read the Protocols, if you have the courage, and compare against reality. You will see that they accurately predict, decades in advance, exactly what Solzhenitsyn wrote. It is not those who are anti-Semitic but those who are Bolshevik enablers who are dumb as rocks, ignorant, lazy and cowards. They refuse to read works like Mein Kampf and Protocols because their cowardice coerces them to remain ignorant. They repeat the Holohoax because they deeply fear being labeled a “denier” and risking their emoluments of the Empire for conforming and obeying, without ever bothering to research it because, you know, how can war propaganda be questioned?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Wally says:
    @Respect
    stop thinking the other way around , paranoid western idiot

    A paranoid believes in his sick mind that everyone is against him , so he may feel entitled to attacks others " preventively " , but he is a paranoid psychopath .

    The facts : Hitler invaded Russia , Russia did not invade Germany , period .

    Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot .

    My my, your little panties are in a twist.
    you said:
    “Maybe Hitler was under the effects of Pervitin , as a good part of the german armies , they were drug adicts , maybe he was having a paranoid amphetamine ( Pervitin ) psychosis .

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

    Probably you will say that zionists put Pervitin and other drugs in the soup of the nazi armies , and that the poor good nazis did not know they were taking it , western idiot .”

    “Maybe“? IOW, you’re making it up.
    Your link provides no proof that they were “addicts”. The link is just some nutter making up Zionist propaganda. LOL

    Of course Germany manufactured drugs, like most countries.

    In spite of the ridiculously childish nature of your claims, there is no doubt that all parties in WWII, and all wars for that matter, used stimulants to keep their troops going. Not to mention pain pills, alcohol, you name it. Drug use in war is as old as war itself. Rather unsurprising really.
    However, as is required in our Jew dominated media environment, only the greatly exaggerated ‘Nazis on drugs’, is acceptable discussion when in fact the Allies were using drugs. That information is not news.

    Yes, Germany attacked the USSR, they had no choice.
    Your dodge of the information that I posted which shoots down your Zionist silliness is classic ‘I can’t hear you’. LOL
    But then you are a not so bright Zionist, a paranoid one at that. LOL

    Cheers.

    http://www.codoh.com

    The ’6,000,000 Jews’ lie and the laughing Mexican:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Hunsdon says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Stalin won because all the russian peoples ( well except the nazi hiwis from western ukraruina ) fought like lions for Russia
     
    Very true but the question was not about WW II, albeit this is too very relevant. The Polichinelle Secret is that Stalin after the death of Lenin, being effectively in charge of Party cadres started to promote people from the "bottom", primarily workers and peasants, to the local and mid-rank Party positions. Needless to say that those cadres were overwhelmingly Slavic and they were loyal to Stalin. In terms of Party proceedings it gave him an enormous leverage since he always could get votes of delegates when he needed. So, "Jews" were doomed from the start--can you believe it, an Orthodox Seminary dropout outmaneuvered and outsmarted all those (I am sure very high IQ) Jews. This is how NEP was stopped and industrialization and collectivization started. This is also how major Soviet social lifts began to function for which overwhelming majority of Russian people fought to the death in WW II since, especially, generation born late-19th-early 20th century could still vividly recall what life was before 1917. Obviously most "Russian" so called scholars in the West have no clue that Revolution of 1905 was in effect the largest peasant uprising in the Russian history and what happened to Russian populace after it was suppressed. Russia was literally "Porota" that is mass-whipped, village after village. This is about those who lived. Paradoxically, these were SRs, many of them Jewish who decidedly refused to take the power which was literally dropping into their hands then for a purely doctrinal reasons--they thought that industrial capitalism in Russia was not developed well enough to provide conditions for socialist revolution. Bolsheviks WILL NOT make this mistake in 1917 and Russian peasantry followed them.

    Andrei, could you recommend one or two good English text sources for interested students of Russian 20th century history? While I can read Russian it is much easier for me to digest complicated texts in my native tongue, English. I thank you in advance for any assistance you can render in this

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    Andrei, could you recommend one or two good English text sources for interested students of Russian 20th century history?
     
    I would go with this:

    https://www.amazon.com/When-Titans-Clashed-Stopped-Studies/dp/0700621210/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1534464566&sr=8-1&keywords=Glantz

    Robert Thurston:

    https://www.amazon.com/Life-Terror-Stalins-Russia-1934-1941/dp/0300064012/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1534464754&sr=1-1&keywords=Thurston+Stalin

    Most of what Stephen Cohen writes and, if available,

    https://www.amazon.com/Calvary-Aleksey-Nikolayevich-Tolstoy-Alexei/dp/B0007E8O4I/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1534464799&sr=1-2&keywords=Road+To+Calvary

    Per GULAG and repressions, Varlam Shalamov and his Kolyma Tales (Stories) are a MUST.

    This is what comes to mind immediately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Josecanuc says:
    @mcohen
    Israel shamir says

    "So indeed there is a great need to bring democracy to the US by restoring President’s constitutional powers and by severely curbing unconstitutional Jewish powers. And fine articles by Ron Unz could be a great start for this road to real American independence."

    You have it the wrong way round.this has nothing to do with trump or democracy.it is simply a line in the sand of what defines a jewish person.

    Fake news and fake jews gimme the blues

    “For the sake of the Jews, we may be required to stop being so Jewish. For the sake of saving our necks… for it is time we cease pretending we are about others and start moving to the top where we belong – not only, of course, for our own sakes but for the sake of an embattled Western world and a vulnerable Jewish folk.”
    “Judaism teaches first and foremost: “If I am not for myself, who will be?” (If we are not for ourselves, who will be?) Judaism requires of us that we forsake any pseudo-ideals that obscure our self-interests . What our former masters may not know is that though we look very different, we are as proudly Jewish as any previous generation. We are not only a fifth column in the corporate world but also heirs of the Rothschilds and Warburgs: We are where we belong, at last. “
    “The prophets had addressed the Jews about their communal obligations and failures, seeking to make them better Jews, not just fine people-in-general.”
    “Gloriously alive and involved, profligately scattering sparks of true being, he is that utter rarity: a person and Jew as one, and no less real in either aspect for being so much the other.”
    Rabbi Heschel has said: “There is a price to be paid by the Jews; in order to be a man he has to be more than a man; in order to be a people, we have to be more than a people.”
    What Israel needs desperately is our concern for its soul. What we need so desperately is an Israel that is unafraid to dissent with itself. We do not need Israel to be more macho than we or more Jewish than we or to win wars because we often lose. We need Israel to be a Zionist, Jewish state. This…is not the “instant Zionism” of Norman Podhoretz (Commentary), which cannot abide criticism…but a Zionism which grew out of a world of dissent. Where are the successors of Haim Greenberg, Stephen Wise, Louis Marshall, and Abraham Heschel? If there is none, it is because there is no audience worthy of them, because we have contemned our heritage of dissent and nonconformity.
    “Ahavat Yisrael – loving other Jews – means the willingness to share even those problems that cannot be solves, to respect fellow Jews…It means remembering what halbanat panim – the prohibition of publicly shaming others – is. And it means remembering that all Jews are brothers and sisters and must treat each other that way….”
    “What is at stake here is democratic Jewish life in American and Israel, and God willing, all over the world.
    What is at stake here is the real power of the Jewish religion to compel and constrain and refute but also to permit and expand and instruct. What is at stake here is the vitality and moral ygiene of the Jewish people. If Israel fails, we die, but if we fail because we tried to be more McCarthyite than McCarthy, then Israel dies too. I believe that God will protect Israel; God will protect Israel with our help. But we must keep the Torah for Him, and we can do that only by treating each other with respect.”
    UNFINISHED RABBI Selected Writings of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Chicago 1998

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    I understand exactly where you are coming from but i believe that the judaism cannot achieve some of the goals you mentioned alone and i therefore take a more worldview that the 3 companions,the 3 abrahamic relegions need to elevate jerusalem to the most holy status it deserves.not the vatican and not mecca.what is important is the sharing and nuturing of jerusalem as a holy place.that is first
    Secondly israel as a country needs to work towards this goal but at the same time uphold its unique position as a land of the jews.
    I wrote a prayer some time ago that i like to say to myself

    Blessed are you Lord
    King of the universe
    Who dwells in the west
    In the east
    In the north
    In the south
    In the earth below
    In the heavens above
    In our souls eternally

    This prayer centres around the 7 dimensions of our world and is for all people who believe in G-d

    The fact is that the balance has been lost in the 3 companions,which you acknowledge but there can be no grey areas about right and wrong.some left wing liberal ideas amongst american jews are off.

    Let us not bullshit about who is a jew.

    You marry a jew before a rabbi.signed and sealed.you raise jewish children with jewish values as stated in the torah.bat or bar mitzvah minimum and some cheder is optional.ten commandments a guide.that is the bare minimum.
    That my friend is the line in the sand.

    Never mind all that democratic crap.thats politics not relegion.seperate issues

    Thank you for introducing me to the rabbi wolf.i will check him out.i was also lucky in my youth to be guided by a great rabbi even though he thought i was a idiot.he once berated me steadily for 15 minutes from the pulpit for reading ayn rand (the virtues of selfishness) in synagogue.

    Virtue of Selfishness. Question: What does Ayn Rand mean when she describes selfishness as a virtue? Answer: Ayn Rand rejects altruism, the view that self-sacrifice is the moral ideal. She argues that the ultimate moral value, for each human individual, is his or her own well-being.Oct 4, 2010

    https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-home&source=hp&ei=G0V2W43BJcaEoAS6v7HYCA&q=ayn+rand+virtue+of+selfishness+summary&oq=ayn+rand+vir&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.1.46j0j0i22i30l3.2944.12236..16024...0.0..0.554.3244.2-10j1j0j1......0....1.......3..41j46i131j0i131.5R-MTtWEu6M

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. bjondo says:

    Did I read somewhere above that Andrei Martynov is a West Bank occupant? Seems so. From Russia to occupy. From occupation to deception.

    Now I have to reread carefully a contributor who seems buddy-buddy with AM.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  172. @Hunsdon
    Andrei, could you recommend one or two good English text sources for interested students of Russian 20th century history? While I can read Russian it is much easier for me to digest complicated texts in my native tongue, English. I thank you in advance for any assistance you can render in this

    Andrei, could you recommend one or two good English text sources for interested students of Russian 20th century history?

    I would go with this:

    https://www.amazon.com/When-Titans-Clashed-Stopped-Studies/dp/0700621210/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1534464566&sr=8-1&keywords=Glantz

    Robert Thurston:

    https://www.amazon.com/Life-Terror-Stalins-Russia-1934-1941/dp/0300064012/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1534464754&sr=1-1&keywords=Thurston+Stalin

    Most of what Stephen Cohen writes and, if available,

    https://www.amazon.com/Calvary-Aleksey-Nikolayevich-Tolstoy-Alexei/dp/B0007E8O4I/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1534464799&sr=1-2&keywords=Road+To+Calvary

    Per GULAG and repressions, Varlam Shalamov and his Kolyma Tales (Stories) are a MUST.

    This is what comes to mind immediately.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. mcohen says:
    @Josecanuc
    “For the sake of the Jews, we may be required to stop being so Jewish. For the sake of saving our necks... for it is time we cease pretending we are about others and start moving to the top where we belong - not only, of course, for our own sakes but for the sake of an embattled Western world and a vulnerable Jewish folk.”
    “Judaism teaches first and foremost: “If I am not for myself, who will be?” (If we are not for ourselves, who will be?) Judaism requires of us that we forsake any pseudo-ideals that obscure our self-interests . What our former masters may not know is that though we look very different, we are as proudly Jewish as any previous generation. We are not only a fifth column in the corporate world but also heirs of the Rothschilds and Warburgs: We are where we belong, at last. “
    “The prophets had addressed the Jews about their communal obligations and failures, seeking to make them better Jews, not just fine people-in-general.”
    “Gloriously alive and involved, profligately scattering sparks of true being, he is that utter rarity: a person and Jew as one, and no less real in either aspect for being so much the other.”
    Rabbi Heschel has said: “There is a price to be paid by the Jews; in order to be a man he has to be more than a man; in order to be a people, we have to be more than a people.”
    What Israel needs desperately is our concern for its soul. What we need so desperately is an Israel that is unafraid to dissent with itself. We do not need Israel to be more macho than we or more Jewish than we or to win wars because we often lose. We need Israel to be a Zionist, Jewish state. This...is not the “instant Zionism” of Norman Podhoretz (Commentary), which cannot abide criticism...but a Zionism which grew out of a world of dissent. Where are the successors of Haim Greenberg, Stephen Wise, Louis Marshall, and Abraham Heschel? If there is none, it is because there is no audience worthy of them, because we have contemned our heritage of dissent and nonconformity.
    “Ahavat Yisrael - loving other Jews - means the willingness to share even those problems that cannot be solves, to respect fellow Jews...It means remembering what halbanat panim - the prohibition of publicly shaming others - is. And it means remembering that all Jews are brothers and sisters and must treat each other that way....”
    “What is at stake here is democratic Jewish life in American and Israel, and God willing, all over the world.
    What is at stake here is the real power of the Jewish religion to compel and constrain and refute but also to permit and expand and instruct. What is at stake here is the vitality and moral ygiene of the Jewish people. If Israel fails, we die, but if we fail because we tried to be more McCarthyite than McCarthy, then Israel dies too. I believe that God will protect Israel; God will protect Israel with our help. But we must keep the Torah for Him, and we can do that only by treating each other with respect.”
    UNFINISHED RABBI Selected Writings of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Chicago 1998

    I understand exactly where you are coming from but i believe that the judaism cannot achieve some of the goals you mentioned alone and i therefore take a more worldview that the 3 companions,the 3 abrahamic relegions need to elevate jerusalem to the most holy status it deserves.not the vatican and not mecca.what is important is the sharing and nuturing of jerusalem as a holy place.that is first
    Secondly israel as a country needs to work towards this goal but at the same time uphold its unique position as a land of the jews.
    I wrote a prayer some time ago that i like to say to myself

    Blessed are you Lord
    King of the universe
    Who dwells in the west
    In the east
    In the north
    In the south
    In the earth below
    In the heavens above
    In our souls eternally

    This prayer centres around the 7 dimensions of our world and is for all people who believe in G-d

    The fact is that the balance has been lost in the 3 companions,which you acknowledge but there can be no grey areas about right and wrong.some left wing liberal ideas amongst american jews are off.

    Let us not bullshit about who is a jew.

    You marry a jew before a rabbi.signed and sealed.you raise jewish children with jewish values as stated in the torah.bat or bar mitzvah minimum and some cheder is optional.ten commandments a guide.that is the bare minimum.
    That my friend is the line in the sand.

    Never mind all that democratic crap.thats politics not relegion.seperate issues

    Thank you for introducing me to the rabbi wolf.i will check him out.i was also lucky in my youth to be guided by a great rabbi even though he thought i was a idiot.he once berated me steadily for 15 minutes from the pulpit for reading ayn rand (the virtues of selfishness) in synagogue.

    Virtue of Selfishness. Question: What does Ayn Rand mean when she describes selfishness as a virtue? Answer: Ayn Rand rejects altruism, the view that self-sacrifice is the moral ideal. She argues that the ultimate moral value, for each human individual, is his or her own well-being.Oct 4, 2010

    https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-home&source=hp&ei=G0V2W43BJcaEoAS6v7HYCA&q=ayn+rand+virtue+of+selfishness+summary&oq=ayn+rand+vir&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.1.46j0j0i22i30l3.2944.12236..16024…0.0..0.554.3244.2-10j1j0j1……0….1…….3..41j46i131j0i131.5R-MTtWEu6M

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    Ayn Rand aka Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum born in Russia.

    Just like there are no atheist in fox holes.....there aren't any libertarians on government programs until they need them.

    'In 1976, she retired from writing her newsletter and allowed Evva Pryor, an employee of her attorney, to enroll her in Social Security and Medicare''.


    Gore Vidal called her viewpoint "nearly perfect in its immorality".......he should have added nearly perfect in her hypocrisy also.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. @Likeitornot
    Re: "For more than 50 years, the Catholic Church has lost every battle in the culture wars."

    Of course. It has been destroyed byVatican II. The last Pope was Pius XII.

    It’s not a “lame excuse” you nitwit. It’s a very cogent reference to a crucial change inthe Church of the last 50 years. Think!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. renfro says:
    @mcohen
    I understand exactly where you are coming from but i believe that the judaism cannot achieve some of the goals you mentioned alone and i therefore take a more worldview that the 3 companions,the 3 abrahamic relegions need to elevate jerusalem to the most holy status it deserves.not the vatican and not mecca.what is important is the sharing and nuturing of jerusalem as a holy place.that is first
    Secondly israel as a country needs to work towards this goal but at the same time uphold its unique position as a land of the jews.
    I wrote a prayer some time ago that i like to say to myself

    Blessed are you Lord
    King of the universe
    Who dwells in the west
    In the east
    In the north
    In the south
    In the earth below
    In the heavens above
    In our souls eternally

    This prayer centres around the 7 dimensions of our world and is for all people who believe in G-d

    The fact is that the balance has been lost in the 3 companions,which you acknowledge but there can be no grey areas about right and wrong.some left wing liberal ideas amongst american jews are off.

    Let us not bullshit about who is a jew.

    You marry a jew before a rabbi.signed and sealed.you raise jewish children with jewish values as stated in the torah.bat or bar mitzvah minimum and some cheder is optional.ten commandments a guide.that is the bare minimum.
    That my friend is the line in the sand.

    Never mind all that democratic crap.thats politics not relegion.seperate issues

    Thank you for introducing me to the rabbi wolf.i will check him out.i was also lucky in my youth to be guided by a great rabbi even though he thought i was a idiot.he once berated me steadily for 15 minutes from the pulpit for reading ayn rand (the virtues of selfishness) in synagogue.

    Virtue of Selfishness. Question: What does Ayn Rand mean when she describes selfishness as a virtue? Answer: Ayn Rand rejects altruism, the view that self-sacrifice is the moral ideal. She argues that the ultimate moral value, for each human individual, is his or her own well-being.Oct 4, 2010

    https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-home&source=hp&ei=G0V2W43BJcaEoAS6v7HYCA&q=ayn+rand+virtue+of+selfishness+summary&oq=ayn+rand+vir&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.1.46j0j0i22i30l3.2944.12236..16024...0.0..0.554.3244.2-10j1j0j1......0....1.......3..41j46i131j0i131.5R-MTtWEu6M

    Ayn Rand aka Alisa Zinov’yevna Rosenbaum born in Russia.

    Just like there are no atheist in fox holes…..there aren’t any libertarians on government programs until they need them.

    ‘In 1976, she retired from writing her newsletter and allowed Evva Pryor, an employee of her attorney, to enroll her in Social Security and Medicare”.

    Gore Vidal called her viewpoint “nearly perfect in its immorality”…….he should have added nearly perfect in her hypocrisy also.

    Read More
    • Agree: Talha, AaronB
    • Replies: @mcohen
    [Commenters who make absolutely no effort at proper capitalization, spacing, or punctuation should not be surprised if their remarks are trashed.]

    Yeah i know.the ayn rand mention was teaser for the geezer
    I read a few of her books.great stories.which one did you read?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. I.M says:
    @CalDre
    I stumbled upon a paper ("Bolshevism: From Moses to Lenin") describing the Nazi's view of Jewish infiltration of Christianity, including Paul the Apostle, as well as Luther's role in enabling Jewry. It generally describes the alleged Jewish version of "embrace and extend".

    Not what you were looking for directly but ....

    Thank you for that!

    Luckily i managed to find the article itself.

    http://www.unz.com/article/review-the-jesuit-order-as-a-synagogue-of-jews/

    Anybody referencing any kind of ‘conversion’ should read this first to put such things in their proper context. The fact that Berezovsky converted is proof towards his subversive activities on behalf of that group, not against.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. mcohen says:
    @renfro
    Ayn Rand aka Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum born in Russia.

    Just like there are no atheist in fox holes.....there aren't any libertarians on government programs until they need them.

    'In 1976, she retired from writing her newsletter and allowed Evva Pryor, an employee of her attorney, to enroll her in Social Security and Medicare''.


    Gore Vidal called her viewpoint "nearly perfect in its immorality".......he should have added nearly perfect in her hypocrisy also.

    [Commenters who make absolutely no effort at proper capitalization, spacing, or punctuation should not be surprised if their remarks are trashed.]

    Yeah i know.the ayn rand mention was teaser for the geezer
    I read a few of her books.great stories.which one did you read?

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    I read Atlas Shrug ....that was enough. ....wasn't interested in her 'gimmick ' books after that.
    She was probably one of the first modern gimmick writers.....i.e....seizing on some extreme ideology to make a name for herself......after she failed at screen writing in LA and at plays in NY.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Anonymous[129] • Disclaimer says:
    @nickels


    Indeed there is no better tool against Jewish supremacy than the glorious name of Christ; but it will take time and effort for Americans to recognise that.

     

    Bingo. This thing goes one way or the other. Christ or AntiChrist.

    Christ = Jew.
    Antichrist = Anti-Jew.
    Is anti-Jew a problem with you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. anonymous[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @CalDre
    As in so many things, it is, really, quite remarkable how the Protocols are so absolutely prescient about virtually everything. Not only in what will happen in the future, hundreds of years from when these "obvious forgeries" were found, but also who is behind them all (hint: they belong to a highly tribalistic group or their agents).

    Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol’ liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation.
     
    In history there have been three primary unifying forces: family, clan/tribe/nation, and religion. As is made clear in the Communist Manifestos, the goal is to destroy all three - and, boy, are Liberals doing an unbelievably fantastic job of that! Open borders, feminism, abortion, atheism, etc. The goal of Communism is to revert all humans to an undifferentiated state and form their minds as Communists deem fit - all those who cannot be totally controlled are, as the Bolsheviks and Stalinists and Maoists and other Communists demonstrated, to be "liquidated". It is basically the world of Big Brother in "1984" - they form their human subjects as an artist forms clay.

    As to atomization and dissension, my guess is you have never actually read the Protocols, due to the self-censorship and cowardice associated with Communists. I dare you to open your mind and read them objectively. If they are not an actual blueprint for the future (which has since largely been implemented, both in Bolshevism and Western Liberalism, which is to lead to the former), please, do explain which (main) parts of it are inaccurate (of course over a 150-year span there will be some (minor) strategic and tactical adjustments in this eternal "war").

    Jesus was the original Bolshevist, openly advocating to destroy family and nation, e.g., Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30.

    [Jesus] rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties…The motive force behind the purity and power of this complete negation is ecstatic inspiration and enthusiastic hope of a new world. Hence his passionate attack upon everything that exists. Everything may be destroyed because God in His omnipotence will rebuild the future order…The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism. The Bolshevists, too, wish to destroy everything that exists because they regard it as hopelessly bad.

    Ludwig von Mises
    Socialism, p. 413

    So it’s not surprising that the followers of Bolshevist Jesus were the original Communists.

    “Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:32-35

    Bolshie Jesus is not the anti-communists friend.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    Acts 4 has nothing to do with Bolshevism or socialism. A small group of people with a common view and love for each other shared things together. That was quite common in tribal societies. There is nothing wrong with voluntary sharing, most people do it at least within the family, or is the family Boslhevik too in your view?
    , @Seraphim
    Guess who was Ludwig von Mises.
    "Ludwig von Mises was born to Jewish parents in the city of Lemberg, Galicia, Austria-Hungary (now Lviv, Ukraine). The family of his father Arthur Edler von Mises had been elevated to the Austrian nobility in the 19th century (Edler indicates a noble landless family); they had been involved in financing and constructing railroads. Ludwig's mother, Adele (née: Landau), was a niece of Dr. Joachim Landau, a Liberal Party deputy to the Austrian Parliament...
    Later he was economic adviser to Otto von Habsburg...
    At one time, Mises praised the work of philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (aka Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum).

    Duh, a Jewish liberal aristocrat capitalist who doesn't love Jesus and Bolshevism. What a surprise.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. CalDre says:
    @anonymous
    Jesus was the original Bolshevist, openly advocating to destroy family and nation, e.g., Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30.

    [Jesus] rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties…The motive force behind the purity and power of this complete negation is ecstatic inspiration and enthusiastic hope of a new world. Hence his passionate attack upon everything that exists. Everything may be destroyed because God in His omnipotence will rebuild the future order…The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism. The Bolshevists, too, wish to destroy everything that exists because they regard it as hopelessly bad.

    Ludwig von Mises
    Socialism, p. 413
     
    So it's not surprising that the followers of Bolshevist Jesus were the original Communists.

    "Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them...and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need." Acts 4:32-35
     
    Bolshie Jesus is not the anti-communists friend.

    Acts 4 has nothing to do with Bolshevism or socialism. A small group of people with a common view and love for each other shared things together. That was quite common in tribal societies. There is nothing wrong with voluntary sharing, most people do it at least within the family, or is the family Boslhevik too in your view?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Nice try at creating an acceptable narrative, but the Communist Church wasn't voluntary. See the next chapter, Acts 5, and how the Communists collected money via coercion.

    Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events. Acts 5:11
     
    Being compelled to do give out of "great fear" is the opposite of "voluntary." It's coercion. You're lying.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Anonymous[214] • Disclaimer says:
    @CalDre
    Acts 4 has nothing to do with Bolshevism or socialism. A small group of people with a common view and love for each other shared things together. That was quite common in tribal societies. There is nothing wrong with voluntary sharing, most people do it at least within the family, or is the family Boslhevik too in your view?

    Nice try at creating an acceptable narrative, but the Communist Church wasn’t voluntary. See the next chapter, Acts 5, and how the Communists collected money via coercion.

    Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events. Acts 5:11

    Being compelled to do give out of “great fear” is the opposite of “voluntary.” It’s coercion. You’re lying.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. SteveK9 says:

    Whether ‘Roundup’ (Monsanto) is a carcinogen is a question of Science not politics. It is not a carcinogen. But, Science is really in retreat these days, to our misfortune.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  183. Israel Shamir has written many prescient, original, and iconoclastic essays. This is one of his most brilliant. He deserves our gratitude and he also deserves far greater recognition. Thank you, Mr. Shamir.

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Disagree: utu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  184. @Andrei Martyanov

    “High quality” whites don’t join the Left, the Left co-opts them.
     
    Small clarification--Western Left. There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left. But we may move even further--so called Western Left is not really Left, it is a brand assigned to it by people who practice faux-scholarship. Reality and a driving force of the Western Left is not so much Marxism, to which this W.Left appeals when it suites it, but still good ol' liberalism. Western Left is a pinnacle of liberalism, it is its final form which atomized society utterly and in doing so undermined its foundation. The United States was a perfect nation to do so, it is the same as it is a perfect nation, as an example, for organizing Holocaust industry and selling it as a guilt medicine and use it as a coercion tool, the practice also imposed on war-torn Europe by its alleged "liberators". It is also a perfect country to subvert its foreign and defense policies because the United States doesn't know what REAL war is. Even rabid Russophobe Richard Pipes openly admitted it. In the end, United States never formed as a true nation. In many respects popular American 20th "history" of Russia is so consistently associated with "Jewishness" (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn't sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews. Especially against the background of once great country literally turning into the third world multicultural cloaca with grim or no prospects at all. Sad, especially when one looks at purely American phenomenon of a vast strata of Christian Zionists loyal to Israel--an exhibit A of America's failure to form as a cohesive nation.

    Lol I only really learned of (in English) “cultural Marxism” and its political connotation in America maybe the past year.

    There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left.

    Thank God I learned to read Chinese unlike 99+% of Chinese immigrant kids, so that I could expose myself to the Chinese Left. What do I think of the Western Left? Let me quote a guy with BS in Hebrew from Beijing University and PhD in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard.

    靠殖民地和排他移民起家的国家好像不大可能不走到假左翼和极端右翼成为社会主流的社会。美加澳,还有某中东国家。

    Translation:

    Nations founded on colonialism and dispossession seem to be unable to not go to a fusion of pseudo left and far right as the social mainstream. America, Canada, Australia, and some Middle Eastern country.

    I also promoted you on my site: https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/from-unz-review/.

    Finally, you will probably be interested to hear that a Chinese physicist who appears a genuine expert on Jewish/Israeli history believes that Israel will collapse alongside its dependency America within 30 years time, much out of an inevitable devaluation of the dollar. Hmm, the number of smart people who are VERY pessimistic about the prospect of the West may be much higher than I expected. For more context, see https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/more-in-chinese/.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I read Jewish publications regularly. They are looking to move to China. Their publications are full of praise for China and Chinese as well as endlessly proclaiming how much Chinese and Jews have in common. There’s even approval of Jewish man Chinese women marriages.

    They are also delving into history and finding various medieval and earlier Chinese Jewish connections in Central Asia. There were a lot of Persian Indian Armenian traders in medieval China so they make a big deal out of the Jews ami g those traders.

    And of course the state of Israel sells all sorts of American military information, armaments and technology to China and America can’t do a thing about it.

    China is the next Jewish target. So don’t be smug about America’s subservience to Israel and Jews They’ve got their eye on you, just as they had their eye on the USA in 1870 as their next conquest.
    , @mcohen
    Gspot machine

    I had a look at your blog and it is very informative.However i was surprised that there were no photos of you on facebook.I must recommend that you clearly identify yourself as most western bloggers do,as it helps to make your blog more believable.I am aware that you work for chinese intelligence and use your site to gain access to posters on unz.The giveaway is the nonsense about the pseudo left in china.Where were you at tianamen square.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. Over and over and over again the Jews have led the gentiles to do all the things the Torah teaches Jews to avoid, like usury and sexual liberality, and over and over they were destroyed. The survivors move on to the next ignorant but rising nation, and teach the various sins to them, so they will weaken and allow the Jews to strip them of their wealth. Do you really think the American gentiles are going to awake and come to the party in time to stop their Jewish engineered crash? Not likely. The only way to play this is to hide your assets and wait for the inevitable Jewish-led crash of the USA. Most of the Jewish scammers I knew in my youth have moved to Southeast Asia already. By the time the killing of Jews starts once again, most of their leaders and bankers will be long gone, heading for Asia to start all over again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  186. Great article, always good to hear both sides. Lots of disinfo out there on tis subject.

    Everyone here screaming about the left, liberals, socialists, and communists being responsible for open borders, mass immigration, abortion, all the other “marxism”
    They tend to forget that all of this happens whether its a conservative republican, liberal democrat in office, doesn’t matter.

    Its all bullshit. Reagan was amnesty king, how many republicans are fighting mass immigration? How many are against the wars that cause it? Trump has done more harm to 2nd amendment than obama, all of the censorship taking place right now, what are republicans doing? Trump? 800 billion more to MIC, tax cuts for Wall St. Healthcare is still crap and unaffordable, 2 years in now.

    You’re a fool if you think republicans are against mass immigration or any of the other things you accuse the “left” of. They’re all the same. Quit voting for the traitors. They’re all owned by the same parasites. Why would they change and do something good for you? Idiots are gonna show up and vote for them no matter how badly they screw you. Why change?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  187. Capitalists have plenty of blood on their hands too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  188. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    He ended what perhaps could become Jewish dominance, but never became. Lenin was not a Jew no way
     
    In fact, his lineage was that of low-level nobility which absolutely precludes him being Jewish since Jews were verboten from any noble titles in Russia. Simple as that. Moreover, I am always fascinated by the fact of total disregard of, say, Maxim Gorky's (Peshkov) immense ideological influence and role in Russian Marxism, together with Savva Morozov's support of revolutionary movement.

    Lenin’s lineage wasn’t low level nobility. His father got the title when he was promoted to chief of the school department of an entire province.

    That was the Russian custom. It was a perk for civil servants who were promoted to a certain level. Given that one son was hanged for revolutionary activities and Lenin was in exile most of his adult life his children didn’t inherit the title.

    It’s interesting that the revolution began in the 1860s among the newly established university professors and students as well as the teachers mostly women in the newly established state elementary and secondary school system. One of the covers used by the revolutionaries was the monthly elementary teachers meetings. That was where they met to discuss tactics and strategies and make their plans.

    The murderers of Czar Alexander all came out of the universities.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @gmachine1729
    Lol I only really learned of (in English) "cultural Marxism" and its political connotation in America maybe the past year.

    There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left.
     
    Thank God I learned to read Chinese unlike 99+% of Chinese immigrant kids, so that I could expose myself to the Chinese Left. What do I think of the Western Left? Let me quote a guy with BS in Hebrew from Beijing University and PhD in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard.

    靠殖民地和排他移民起家的国家好像不大可能不走到假左翼和极端右翼成为社会主流的社会。美加澳,还有某中东国家。
     
    Translation:

    Nations founded on colonialism and dispossession seem to be unable to not go to a fusion of pseudo left and far right as the social mainstream. America, Canada, Australia, and some Middle Eastern country.
     
    I also promoted you on my site: https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/from-unz-review/.

    Finally, you will probably be interested to hear that a Chinese physicist who appears a genuine expert on Jewish/Israeli history believes that Israel will collapse alongside its dependency America within 30 years time, much out of an inevitable devaluation of the dollar. Hmm, the number of smart people who are VERY pessimistic about the prospect of the West may be much higher than I expected. For more context, see https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/more-in-chinese/.

    I read Jewish publications regularly. They are looking to move to China. Their publications are full of praise for China and Chinese as well as endlessly proclaiming how much Chinese and Jews have in common. There’s even approval of Jewish man Chinese women marriages.

    They are also delving into history and finding various medieval and earlier Chinese Jewish connections in Central Asia. There were a lot of Persian Indian Armenian traders in medieval China so they make a big deal out of the Jews ami g those traders.

    And of course the state of Israel sells all sorts of American military information, armaments and technology to China and America can’t do a thing about it.

    China is the next Jewish target. So don’t be smug about America’s subservience to Israel and Jews They’ve got their eye on you, just as they had their eye on the USA in 1870 as their next conquest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. Umberto Eco made my head ache.

    —-

    Regarding the courts vs congress: Lawrence Lessig is spokesman for a group for whom David Boies is (pro bono) legal counsel, in the attempt to get COURTS, the Supreme Court, to reform the Electoral College system.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?449762-4/washington-journal-lawrence-lessig-discusses-legal-challenges-electoral-college&playEvent

    Lessig’s movement is Equal Votes

    https://equalvotes.us

    Its goal is NOT to dismantle the Electoral College — Lessig agrees that small states require the Electoral College system if they wish to have impact against a few large states. Rather, the change Lessig seeks is from winner-take-all distribution of votes to Electors, to proportional distribution of votes.
    This would mean that a candidate would have to campaign just as hard in, i.e. Washington states as in Florida or Pennsylvania, which have large electoral voting blocks and typically vote in a lopsided fashion. If that is the case, then other issues would also take the stage: if a candidate needs worry only about winning, i.e. Pennsylvania, then he panders to Pennsylvania issues. If candidates are forced to campaign for ALL states electoral college votes, he might be forced to take a position on, i.e. solar panels, or wind turbines, or off-shore drilling.

    What Lessig seeks has merit, but it’s ironic that his group seeks to achieve their goal through the courts rather than through the representatives of the people.

    Also noteworthy is that Lessig’s legislation would put a small spanner in a long-standing zionist machine: in ~1955 Yale professor of political science H. Bradford Westerfield explained the rising power of “zealous, well-funded, and unopposed” zionists. They were successful in controlling elections, Westerfield said, precisely because of the winner-take-all system, and the fact that Jews tended to dwell in one of several swing states where the Jewish vote could force the decision for the whole state and thence, possibly, for the whole country.

    —-

    One more thought, re Judges: Kavenaugh the Catholic judge is, imo, a feint: he was a Bush man. Hard to imagine I’m on the same side as Schumer, but Kavenaugh has serious flaws.
    Roe v Wade is not the most important issue; Kavenaugh’s support for Bush decisions and policies are far more significant — Where would K. stand on the unitary executive ability to engage war vs. requirement that Congress declare war? How about torture? etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  191. Haha, they’re eternal parasites. Can you link me to some representative such publications?

    Reminds me of my white friend who was like:

    Jews are white because white people still rule the world. If Chinese people were triumphant you’d see a lotta Jews intermarrying and saying they were always Chinese.

    I’ve also been told that they fund pro-Israeli/Jewish commenters on Weibo.

    Their publications are full of praise for China and Chinese as well as endlessly proclaiming how much Chinese and Jews have in common.

    On the contrary, that Beijing University Hebrew major graduate writes how anti-China Israelis are. Though he also says that there are plenty of Jews/Israelis who trick Chinese into becoming pro-Israel.

    China is the next Jewish target. So don’t be smug about America’s subservience to Israel and Jews They’ve got their eye on you, just as they had their eye on the USA in 1870 as their next conquest.

    Lol wish them best of luck with that cultural, language, plus physical appearance barrier.

    Reminds of how Martyanov asserted that contrary to the popular American depiction, it was actually much more that Russia tamed Jews than the other way round.

    In many respects popular American 20th “history” of Russia is so consistently associated with “Jewishness” (apart from obvious ignorance of those who write it) because it is projection of own complex of inferiority. Russia changed Jews, Jews changed the United States and this inequality will exist and this is one which bothers greatly many of those WASPies in the US who have to face the fact that Russia didn’t sell out to Jews, while the United States today is effectively run by them in key sectors of national activity. This Russia-USSR-Bolsheviks-Jews-GULAG mantra is needed as a therapy for very many Americans in order to block out how they, and others, sold out their country to these very same Jews.

    Not that I know much about this, but I vaguely remember hearing that the Kaifeng Jews were pretty much fully assimilated into Chinese culture.

    Oh Товарищ Мартьянов did you know that I am a fan of Iosif Kobzon? And also many Soviet songs from the Stalin era that were composed by Jews, who are of course very artistically talented. ;)

    I also ask myself why American culture couldn’t tame me the way it did to all those other culturally delusional bananas.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  192. renfro says:
    @mcohen
    [Commenters who make absolutely no effort at proper capitalization, spacing, or punctuation should not be surprised if their remarks are trashed.]

    Yeah i know.the ayn rand mention was teaser for the geezer
    I read a few of her books.great stories.which one did you read?

    I read Atlas Shrug ….that was enough. ….wasn’t interested in her ‘gimmick ‘ books after that.
    She was probably one of the first modern gimmick writers…..i.e….seizing on some extreme ideology to make a name for herself……after she failed at screen writing in LA and at plays in NY.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    I read both the fountainhead and atlas shrugged.great stories.Her "gimmicks" aside she was still a great storyteller.I never took her philosophy seriously as i realized it was just part of the show.
    Have you written much yourself ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. mcohen says:
    @renfro
    I read Atlas Shrug ....that was enough. ....wasn't interested in her 'gimmick ' books after that.
    She was probably one of the first modern gimmick writers.....i.e....seizing on some extreme ideology to make a name for herself......after she failed at screen writing in LA and at plays in NY.

    I read both the fountainhead and atlas shrugged.great stories.Her “gimmicks” aside she was still a great storyteller.I never took her philosophy seriously as i realized it was just part of the show.
    Have you written much yourself ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    Have you written much yourself ?
     
    I have zero writing talent these days...lol.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. mcohen says:
    @gmachine1729
    Lol I only really learned of (in English) "cultural Marxism" and its political connotation in America maybe the past year.

    There is Russian Left and Chinese Left and they look completely different next to Western Left.
     
    Thank God I learned to read Chinese unlike 99+% of Chinese immigrant kids, so that I could expose myself to the Chinese Left. What do I think of the Western Left? Let me quote a guy with BS in Hebrew from Beijing University and PhD in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard.

    靠殖民地和排他移民起家的国家好像不大可能不走到假左翼和极端右翼成为社会主流的社会。美加澳,还有某中东国家。
     
    Translation:

    Nations founded on colonialism and dispossession seem to be unable to not go to a fusion of pseudo left and far right as the social mainstream. America, Canada, Australia, and some Middle Eastern country.
     
    I also promoted you on my site: https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/from-unz-review/.

    Finally, you will probably be interested to hear that a Chinese physicist who appears a genuine expert on Jewish/Israeli history believes that Israel will collapse alongside its dependency America within 30 years time, much out of an inevitable devaluation of the dollar. Hmm, the number of smart people who are VERY pessimistic about the prospect of the West may be much higher than I expected. For more context, see https://gmachine1729.com/quotes/anti-semitic-quotes/more-in-chinese/.

    Gspot machine

    I had a look at your blog and it is very informative.However i was surprised that there were no photos of you on facebook.I must recommend that you clearly identify yourself as most western bloggers do,as it helps to make your blog more believable.I am aware that you work for chinese intelligence and use your site to gain access to posters on unz.The giveaway is the nonsense about the pseudo left in china.Where were you at tianamen square.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man

    Read More
    • Replies: @gmachine1729

    I am aware that you work for chinese intelligence and use your site to gain access to posters on unz.
     
    Haha I told my friend this and he was like

    yea people always assume anyone posting pro china stuff is a wumao, quite stupid
     
    I'm writing that blog much for my own entertainment/notes as well as, I'll acknowledge, due to some form of disillusionment with what's going on right now.

    The giveaway is the nonsense about the pseudo left in china.
     
    ???
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. @Jeff Stryker
    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the "white ethnics" they live elbow-to-asshole with (Irish, Italian, Polish, even Arab) in the Northern cities?

    Since the South is so far away compared to Irish-Catholics in Boston or Italians in Jersey?

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with

    My impression is that it has a lot to do with the lynching of Leo Frank in 1915. That incident prompted the founding of the ADL.

    Many northern urban Jews who have never travelled south of the Potomac have the idea that the South is and always was a hotbed of anti-Semitism. This is historically untrue; one of the oldest Jewish settlements in the United States is the old Sephardic community in South Carolina, which has always been accepted and respected there.

    I remember several years ago, when National Review still published the e-mail addresses of its writers, I responded to an article by John Podhoretz in which he had characterized the “old Confederacy” as a “hotbed of anti-Semitism.” I pointed out that Judah Benjamin had been a U.S. Senator before secession, and had occupied cabinet offices under the C.S.A., long before any Jew from the North held such positions under the Union; and that the most notorious act of anti-Semitism that took place during the War Between the States was Ulysses S. Grant’s General Orders No. 11, providing that -

    “The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours of this order…”

    Grant’s General Orders No. 11 is well known to any serious student of the War, and so eminent an historian as Bruce Catton observed that it “would leave a queer enduring stain on his [Grant's] own name.”

    Despite this, Poddy, in a churlish fashion that I have since learnt is typical of him, replied with a rude and vulgar e-mail to the effect that I must be the sort of person who saved his Confederate money in the hope that the South would rise again.

    Such people are captives of their preferred narrative to such an extent that they dismiss well-documented evidence to the contrary and consider anyone who brings it up to be an enemy. I always had respect for Norman Podhoretz’s intelligence, even though I disagreed with him – but his son appears (as Bill Kristol does in comparison with Irving) to be a textbook example of reversion to the mean.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Them Guys
    So, Jews then acted and did everything Jews are well known for, Grant was made aware of it, probably via first hand knowledge, then acts in good faith to halt Jewish abuses, and swindle scams to the I'nth degree against already destroyed southern folks, and then......Wait for It!!

    Grant gets labeled as an.....Antisemite!

    Antisemite= Anybody that speaks truth or facts about Jews.

    Antisemite= Everyone Jews Hate, which is All non Jewish Goyim Gentiles. Per their Talmud.

    Evil SS Nazi Antisemite Jew Hate Monger Racist= Anybody Jews cannot stiffle or corrupt or bribe or threaten enough to, get him or her to recant whatever truths and facts that person said or wrote. These are the few and the wide awakened who are very Jewised Up, and they infuriate and discombobulate Jews to the Max!....These type cause most Jews to so Hate these persons, that if one peers closely one can sometimes see actual Rabid Foaming at Mouth, when said Jews spew their vocal hatred at these "offenders" and Truth tellers. Just, the worst of the worst, in the beady eyed Jew mind.


    PS: It could also be mentioned that, IIRC, that Grant Order to prevent further Jewish Abuse and Swindling scams, caused NY Jewry to fast mobilize and within less than, 24 Hr's. The US Prez agreed to negate Grants order, and once again after a slight delay, International Jewry was free to proceed and continue their typical swindle scaming as if no such delay occured. OyVey!
    , @renfro

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with
     
    If you are speaking of the current Jewish Fifth Column and extreme liberal wing of Jews as well as others , permit me to explain.

    First, the South or majority of Southerners are the last remaining strong hold of 'traditional' America.

    You can read into 'traditional' whatever meaning you want but it is really about preserving family and social values and country values. Southerners tend to be 'old conseratives' which are far different from todays conservatives and old conservatives do have a bit of liberal values, as in concern for their communities and will support some welfare to help people but not take it to the extreme that liberals have. They also do not go for using education for making students 'feel good about themselves', they want to stick to the classic curriculums .

    Second, although most are polite , they really don't care what any one else thinks or what anyone thinks of them. If you are talking to a Southerner about something and he doesn't agree, he will politely reply.....'well, there you go'....that means you're dismissed.

    Third, although there are more Southerner Officers in the military most southerners are not for messing around in foreign countries.

    In short, the South has been the one of the nuts the Jews and liberals haven't been able to crack yet.

    , @Jeff Stryker
    ...There was also the case in Mississippi of the Jewish civil rights worker that was killed by KKK. That probably hardened attitudes.

    Overall, German-Americans and Arab-Americans who live side-by-side with Jews don't seem to get the worst of their ire. I'm German-American and I can count on one hand the Jews who actually took exception to me. Maybe two.

    There might also be an ancient urban/rural conflict. Jews have always been urban traders and the poorest and least influential whites are rural in the United States.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Them Guys says:
    @Crawfurdmuir

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with
     
    My impression is that it has a lot to do with the lynching of Leo Frank in 1915. That incident prompted the founding of the ADL.

    Many northern urban Jews who have never travelled south of the Potomac have the idea that the South is and always was a hotbed of anti-Semitism. This is historically untrue; one of the oldest Jewish settlements in the United States is the old Sephardic community in South Carolina, which has always been accepted and respected there.

    I remember several years ago, when National Review still published the e-mail addresses of its writers, I responded to an article by John Podhoretz in which he had characterized the "old Confederacy" as a "hotbed of anti-Semitism." I pointed out that Judah Benjamin had been a U.S. Senator before secession, and had occupied cabinet offices under the C.S.A., long before any Jew from the North held such positions under the Union; and that the most notorious act of anti-Semitism that took place during the War Between the States was Ulysses S. Grant's General Orders No. 11, providing that -

    "The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours of this order..."

    Grant's General Orders No. 11 is well known to any serious student of the War, and so eminent an historian as Bruce Catton observed that it "would leave a queer enduring stain on his [Grant's] own name."

    Despite this, Poddy, in a churlish fashion that I have since learnt is typical of him, replied with a rude and vulgar e-mail to the effect that I must be the sort of person who saved his Confederate money in the hope that the South would rise again.

    Such people are captives of their preferred narrative to such an extent that they dismiss well-documented evidence to the contrary and consider anyone who brings it up to be an enemy. I always had respect for Norman Podhoretz's intelligence, even though I disagreed with him - but his son appears (as Bill Kristol does in comparison with Irving) to be a textbook example of reversion to the mean.

    So, Jews then acted and did everything Jews are well known for, Grant was made aware of it, probably via first hand knowledge, then acts in good faith to halt Jewish abuses, and swindle scams to the I’nth degree against already destroyed southern folks, and then……Wait for It!!

    Grant gets labeled as an…..Antisemite!

    Antisemite= Anybody that speaks truth or facts about Jews.

    Antisemite= Everyone Jews Hate, which is All non Jewish Goyim Gentiles. Per their Talmud.

    Evil SS Nazi Antisemite Jew Hate Monger Racist= Anybody Jews cannot stiffle or corrupt or bribe or threaten enough to, get him or her to recant whatever truths and facts that person said or wrote. These are the few and the wide awakened who are very Jewised Up, and they infuriate and discombobulate Jews to the Max!….These type cause most Jews to so Hate these persons, that if one peers closely one can sometimes see actual Rabid Foaming at Mouth, when said Jews spew their vocal hatred at these “offenders” and Truth tellers. Just, the worst of the worst, in the beady eyed Jew mind.

    PS: It could also be mentioned that, IIRC, that Grant Order to prevent further Jewish Abuse and Swindling scams, caused NY Jewry to fast mobilize and within less than, 24 Hr’s. The US Prez agreed to negate Grants order, and once again after a slight delay, International Jewry was free to proceed and continue their typical swindle scaming as if no such delay occured. OyVey!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. @mcohen
    Gspot machine

    I had a look at your blog and it is very informative.However i was surprised that there were no photos of you on facebook.I must recommend that you clearly identify yourself as most western bloggers do,as it helps to make your blog more believable.I am aware that you work for chinese intelligence and use your site to gain access to posters on unz.The giveaway is the nonsense about the pseudo left in china.Where were you at tianamen square.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man

    I am aware that you work for chinese intelligence and use your site to gain access to posters on unz.

    Haha I told my friend this and he was like

    yea people always assume anyone posting pro china stuff is a wumao, quite stupid

    I’m writing that blog much for my own entertainment/notes as well as, I’ll acknowledge, due to some form of disillusionment with what’s going on right now.

    The giveaway is the nonsense about the pseudo left in china.

    ???

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. RI says:

    Mr.Shamir, I read your articles with great interest.
    What is your opinion on the strugle in Poland to put the Polish supreme court under the control of the Parliament, which is so much criticized as a blow to democracy and totalitarian?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    I think it is a good idea. It goes in Hungary, too, and in Israel, as well. Tyranny of Courts should be overthrown, and judges should try some of their justice))
    The old hag Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85 and completely senile, does not want to retire. No way! She visited Israel recently and foamed against the countries that force judges to retire at certain age. Happily, she says, in the US we are free to rule forever.
    She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. Anonymous[108] • Disclaimer says:

    Shamir, is this really what you think? Trump is fighting “the church” of jews? What a joke. All his children are in the tribe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    The Church of Jews fights him, anyway. It is still spiritual fight, not a tribal scuffle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. renfro says:
    @mcohen
    I read both the fountainhead and atlas shrugged.great stories.Her "gimmicks" aside she was still a great storyteller.I never took her philosophy seriously as i realized it was just part of the show.
    Have you written much yourself ?

    Have you written much yourself ?

    I have zero writing talent these days…lol.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. renfro says:
    @Crawfurdmuir

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with
     
    My impression is that it has a lot to do with the lynching of Leo Frank in 1915. That incident prompted the founding of the ADL.

    Many northern urban Jews who have never travelled south of the Potomac have the idea that the South is and always was a hotbed of anti-Semitism. This is historically untrue; one of the oldest Jewish settlements in the United States is the old Sephardic community in South Carolina, which has always been accepted and respected there.

    I remember several years ago, when National Review still published the e-mail addresses of its writers, I responded to an article by John Podhoretz in which he had characterized the "old Confederacy" as a "hotbed of anti-Semitism." I pointed out that Judah Benjamin had been a U.S. Senator before secession, and had occupied cabinet offices under the C.S.A., long before any Jew from the North held such positions under the Union; and that the most notorious act of anti-Semitism that took place during the War Between the States was Ulysses S. Grant's General Orders No. 11, providing that -

    "The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours of this order..."

    Grant's General Orders No. 11 is well known to any serious student of the War, and so eminent an historian as Bruce Catton observed that it "would leave a queer enduring stain on his [Grant's] own name."

    Despite this, Poddy, in a churlish fashion that I have since learnt is typical of him, replied with a rude and vulgar e-mail to the effect that I must be the sort of person who saved his Confederate money in the hope that the South would rise again.

    Such people are captives of their preferred narrative to such an extent that they dismiss well-documented evidence to the contrary and consider anyone who brings it up to be an enemy. I always had respect for Norman Podhoretz's intelligence, even though I disagreed with him - but his son appears (as Bill Kristol does in comparison with Irving) to be a textbook example of reversion to the mean.

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with

    If you are speaking of the current Jewish Fifth Column and extreme liberal wing of Jews as well as others , permit me to explain.

    First, the South or majority of Southerners are the last remaining strong hold of ‘traditional’ America.

    You can read into ‘traditional’ whatever meaning you want but it is really about preserving family and social values and country values. Southerners tend to be ‘old conseratives’ which are far different from todays conservatives and old conservatives do have a bit of liberal values, as in concern for their communities and will support some welfare to help people but not take it to the extreme that liberals have. They also do not go for using education for making students ‘feel good about themselves’, they want to stick to the classic curriculums .

    Second, although most are polite , they really don’t care what any one else thinks or what anyone thinks of them. If you are talking to a Southerner about something and he doesn’t agree, he will politely reply…..’well, there you go’….that means you’re dismissed.

    Third, although there are more Southerner Officers in the military most southerners are not for messing around in foreign countries.

    In short, the South has been the one of the nuts the Jews and liberals haven’t been able to crack yet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. @Crawfurdmuir

    Why do Jews want to destroy Southern whites as oppose to the “white ethnics” they live elbow-to-asshole with
     
    My impression is that it has a lot to do with the lynching of Leo Frank in 1915. That incident prompted the founding of the ADL.

    Many northern urban Jews who have never travelled south of the Potomac have the idea that the South is and always was a hotbed of anti-Semitism. This is historically untrue; one of the oldest Jewish settlements in the United States is the old Sephardic community in South Carolina, which has always been accepted and respected there.

    I remember several years ago, when National Review still published the e-mail addresses of its writers, I responded to an article by John Podhoretz in which he had characterized the "old Confederacy" as a "hotbed of anti-Semitism." I pointed out that Judah Benjamin had been a U.S. Senator before secession, and had occupied cabinet offices under the C.S.A., long before any Jew from the North held such positions under the Union; and that the most notorious act of anti-Semitism that took place during the War Between the States was Ulysses S. Grant's General Orders No. 11, providing that -

    "The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours of this order..."

    Grant's General Orders No. 11 is well known to any serious student of the War, and so eminent an historian as Bruce Catton observed that it "would leave a queer enduring stain on his [Grant's] own name."

    Despite this, Poddy, in a churlish fashion that I have since learnt is typical of him, replied with a rude and vulgar e-mail to the effect that I must be the sort of person who saved his Confederate money in the hope that the South would rise again.

    Such people are captives of their preferred narrative to such an extent that they dismiss well-documented evidence to the contrary and consider anyone who brings it up to be an enemy. I always had respect for Norman Podhoretz's intelligence, even though I disagreed with him - but his son appears (as Bill Kristol does in comparison with Irving) to be a textbook example of reversion to the mean.

    …There was also the case in Mississippi of the Jewish civil rights worker that was killed by KKK. That probably hardened attitudes.

    Overall, German-Americans and Arab-Americans who live side-by-side with Jews don’t seem to get the worst of their ire. I’m German-American and I can count on one hand the Jews who actually took exception to me. Maybe two.

    There might also be an ancient urban/rural conflict. Jews have always been urban traders and the poorest and least influential whites are rural in the United States.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    It is interesting that Jews suddenly got interested in farming when they could take over Palestinians' lands to farm on. Many urban American Jews who have emigrated to Israel could have gotten a small plot somewhere in the USA to farm on if they wanted to farm. Even pretty close to NYC or another urban center. Or try some urban farming. Move out of Brooklyn.

    But that doesn't seem to interest them. The idea of farming Palestinians' lands, which they just went and squatted on, also camping near springs and preventing Pals from using their traditional springs (I am talking about in the thirties). Of course, nowadays every aspect of life for Israelis is subsidized by the state, and that means to a great extent by Americans. So, it's a good deal.

    So, in a way the Israeli Jews kind of took over the Palestinians' identity as a rural society. While also displacing them physically.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. @RI
    Mr.Shamir, I read your articles with great interest.
    What is your opinion on the strugle in Poland to put the Polish supreme court under the control of the Parliament, which is so much criticized as a blow to democracy and totalitarian?

    I think it is a good idea. It goes in Hungary, too, and in Israel, as well. Tyranny of Courts should be overthrown, and judges should try some of their justice))
    The old hag Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85 and completely senile, does not want to retire. No way! She visited Israel recently and foamed against the countries that force judges to retire at certain age. Happily, she says, in the US we are free to rule forever.
    She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    "She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired."

    How so? this looks to me like a sign of sanity, actually.
    Israeli men are patriarchal jerks. Israeli women (a lot of them, anyhow) are expected to produce droves of children, wear wigs, have sex once/week, on Friday, the husband first going through a whole religious routine to "get in the mood" . . .
    Ugh.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. @Anonymous
    Shamir, is this really what you think? Trump is fighting "the church" of jews? What a joke. All his children are in the tribe.

    The Church of Jews fights him, anyway. It is still spiritual fight, not a tribal scuffle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Church of Jews?

    "For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision." Philippians 3:3
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. anon[313] • Disclaimer says:

    On the American legal indemnity industry, just remember the case of Erin Brockovich, heroicized in Hollywood in a movie starring the greatest star of that time, Julia Roberts.

    https://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/brockovich.htmlhttps://cap-press.com/sites/pj/erin-jackson.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  206. Skeptikal says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    ...There was also the case in Mississippi of the Jewish civil rights worker that was killed by KKK. That probably hardened attitudes.

    Overall, German-Americans and Arab-Americans who live side-by-side with Jews don't seem to get the worst of their ire. I'm German-American and I can count on one hand the Jews who actually took exception to me. Maybe two.

    There might also be an ancient urban/rural conflict. Jews have always been urban traders and the poorest and least influential whites are rural in the United States.

    It is interesting that Jews suddenly got interested in farming when they could take over Palestinians’ lands to farm on. Many urban American Jews who have emigrated to Israel could have gotten a small plot somewhere in the USA to farm on if they wanted to farm. Even pretty close to NYC or another urban center. Or try some urban farming. Move out of Brooklyn.

    But that doesn’t seem to interest them. The idea of farming Palestinians’ lands, which they just went and squatted on, also camping near springs and preventing Pals from using their traditional springs (I am talking about in the thirties). Of course, nowadays every aspect of life for Israelis is subsidized by the state, and that means to a great extent by Americans. So, it’s a good deal.

    So, in a way the Israeli Jews kind of took over the Palestinians’ identity as a rural society. While also displacing them physically.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    They probably saw no money in it and additionally they tend to need a population center with a surplus economy.

    Nobody hires a lawyer or needs a financial analyst in a small town.

    Also the sleazy-but-legal professions like pornography, strip clubs, pawn shops (Well, in the past) are all in the city.
    , @renfro
    From 1949 to 1965 the US provided food aid to the Israelis.....and sent US agriculture experts to teach them farming practices.

    Even after stealing the most fertile farm land from Palestine , Israel still can't feed itself

    Israel - Agriculture | export.gov
    https://www.export.gov/article?id=Israel-Agriculture Jul 20, 2018 - Israel is not self-sufficient in agriculture and is dependent on imports

    Israel is a Ponzi scheme in dozens of ways.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. Skeptikal says:
    @Israel Shamir
    I think it is a good idea. It goes in Hungary, too, and in Israel, as well. Tyranny of Courts should be overthrown, and judges should try some of their justice))
    The old hag Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85 and completely senile, does not want to retire. No way! She visited Israel recently and foamed against the countries that force judges to retire at certain age. Happily, she says, in the US we are free to rule forever.
    She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired.

    “She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired.”

    How so? this looks to me like a sign of sanity, actually.
    Israeli men are patriarchal jerks. Israeli women (a lot of them, anyhow) are expected to produce droves of children, wear wigs, have sex once/week, on Friday, the husband first going through a whole religious routine to “get in the mood” . . .
    Ugh.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    Apparently you never visited Israel. Jewish women are very assertive, and Jewish men are quite meek in comparison to them. If we were able to control our women, controlling the world would be an easy thing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. @Skeptikal
    It is interesting that Jews suddenly got interested in farming when they could take over Palestinians' lands to farm on. Many urban American Jews who have emigrated to Israel could have gotten a small plot somewhere in the USA to farm on if they wanted to farm. Even pretty close to NYC or another urban center. Or try some urban farming. Move out of Brooklyn.

    But that doesn't seem to interest them. The idea of farming Palestinians' lands, which they just went and squatted on, also camping near springs and preventing Pals from using their traditional springs (I am talking about in the thirties). Of course, nowadays every aspect of life for Israelis is subsidized by the state, and that means to a great extent by Americans. So, it's a good deal.

    So, in a way the Israeli Jews kind of took over the Palestinians' identity as a rural society. While also displacing them physically.

    They probably saw no money in it and additionally they tend to need a population center with a surplus economy.

    Nobody hires a lawyer or needs a financial analyst in a small town.

    Also the sleazy-but-legal professions like pornography, strip clubs, pawn shops (Well, in the past) are all in the city.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. anon[100] • Disclaimer says:

    Correct links about Erin Ebrokovich, icon of the american judicial indemnity industry (comment nr. 205):

    https://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/brockovich.html

    https://cap-press.com/sites/pj/erin-jackson.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  210. @Israel Shamir
    Jews were generally absent from Moscow and SPB before the revolution, that is why their mass migration to the capital cities has caused some alarm and apprehension. Likewise, mass migration of people from Caucasus and Central Asia in 1990s created a feeling of Russia being taken over by these dark strangers. In both cases, it was a question of demographic change, of perception. As a matter of fact, Jews had lost their higher positions in Bolshevik Russia very fast, when young Russian workers and peasants were offered social lifts. By 1930s, the Jews were already out of power, and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.
    Putin's words may be seen as his attempt to ingratiate himself and Russia with the Jews.
    Wilton is not a reliable source: a passionate anti-Communist, he wanted to claim Russia is ruled by ZOG.

    Mr I Shamir, you are wrong, “…and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.”.
    According to the *JTA-Jewish Telegraphic Agency*:
    USSR leader Andropov reportedly hid Jewish roots to advance in party
    June 17, 1999 9:00am

    MOSCOW, June 17 (JTA) — Former Soviet leader Yuri Andropov had Jewish roots, according to recent reports in the Russian press. Andropov, who was in charge of the KGB for 15 years and then headed the USSR from November 1982 until his death in February 1984, concealed his Jewish background after he entered the Communist Party as a young man, according to the reports. Andropov’s mother, Yevgeniya Faynshtein, was a music teacher in southern Russia. The fate of Andropov’s father remains a mystery. His mother later remarried a Russian Greek named Andropulo. His adopted son later changed this last name to a more Russian-sounding one. Unlike many other Soviet leaders, Andropov never wrote his memoirs, which in part can be explained by his roots, say the reports. Andropov’s role in Soviet history is still open to a debate 15 years after his death. During the 1950s he served as Moscow’s ambassador to Hungary and arranged for Soviet tanks to enter Budapest to crush the Hungarian uprising of 1956. Between 1967 and 1982 while he served as head of the KGB, the Soviet secret service, he was responsible for persecuting dissidents, including members of the underground Jewish movement. Yet some credit him for exiling some of the prominent dissidents rather than jailing them — as well as for partially opening the doors for Jewish emigration to Israel in the 1970s. According to the daily newspaper Today, human rights activist Andrei Sakharov once remarked that under Andropov the KGB was the only institution in the USSR that was not corrupt. Some people speculate that had Andropov not died so soon, he would have launched reforms to pump life into the country’s stagnant economy — moves that were later made by Andropov protege Mikhail Gorbachev.

    https://www.jta.org/1999/06/17/news-opinion/ussr-leader-andropov-reportedly-hid-jewish-roots-to-advance-in-party

    Remember Mr I Shamir, Trust is Earned. Sorry. Never trusted you before and most certainly don’t trust you now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir
    That's right! Trust JTA!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Old Jew says:
    @Israel Shamir
    I, for one, always enjoy Giraldi and Sailer; and they have much bigger readership on this site. But thank you anyway!

    I like Sailer too. He makes sense.

    As far as Giraldi “он бешеный пес”. No matter that you are a christian convert he will bite you just because your name is “Israel”

    Read More
    • Replies: @bjondo
    No. Israel Shamir isn't a traitor to America. IS hasn't started any wars. IS doesn't fabricate news to start wars. IS hasn't bankrupted America. The name is irrelevant. Character is important.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. renfro says:
    @Skeptikal
    It is interesting that Jews suddenly got interested in farming when they could take over Palestinians' lands to farm on. Many urban American Jews who have emigrated to Israel could have gotten a small plot somewhere in the USA to farm on if they wanted to farm. Even pretty close to NYC or another urban center. Or try some urban farming. Move out of Brooklyn.

    But that doesn't seem to interest them. The idea of farming Palestinians' lands, which they just went and squatted on, also camping near springs and preventing Pals from using their traditional springs (I am talking about in the thirties). Of course, nowadays every aspect of life for Israelis is subsidized by the state, and that means to a great extent by Americans. So, it's a good deal.

    So, in a way the Israeli Jews kind of took over the Palestinians' identity as a rural society. While also displacing them physically.

    From 1949 to 1965 the US provided food aid to the Israelis…..and sent US agriculture experts to teach them farming practices.

    Even after stealing the most fertile farm land from Palestine , Israel still can’t feed itself

    Israel – Agriculture | export.gov
    https://www.export.gov/article?id=Israel-Agriculture Jul 20, 2018 – Israel is not self-sufficient in agriculture and is dependent on imports

    Israel is a Ponzi scheme in dozens of ways.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    Very interesting link.
    Provides a lot of food for thought for BDS.
    If Israelis were as smart as the Dutch, they would be exporting agricultural and horticultural products.
    They have the sun. All they would need to do is go vertical. Of course, they would have to steal that much more water from the Pals.

    Really, Israel is kind of like the American Southwest, cities such as Phoenix: a totally unsustainable lifestyle pursued by a population who want to "green" the desert for their own enjoyment and at the expense of other people, and the earth. In other words, the American Way . . .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. bjondo says:
    @Old Jew
    I like Sailer too. He makes sense.

    As far as Giraldi "он бешеный пес". No matter that you are a christian convert he will bite you just because your name is "Israel"

    No. Israel Shamir isn’t a traitor to America. IS hasn’t started any wars. IS doesn’t fabricate news to start wars. IS hasn’t bankrupted America. The name is irrelevant. Character is important.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Jew
    One way to look at Mr. Giraldi is this:


    .... "Mr. Giraldi is not stupid.

    Giraldi, is a talented anti-Jews writer (almost as good as the late professor William Pierce, of “National Alliance” and Turner Diaries fame).

    In a sense he is like Giordano Bruno, ready “to be burned at the stake” for his Truth.

    Here at Unz he finds strong voices of support to confirm his views.

    He can not conceive that this group of supporters is minuscule, compared to the enormous majority
    of Americans that are indifferent to his issues, or harbor opposing views.

    In science we say: Truth is not subject to the Vote. All of learned Europe “voted” that the Earth is the center of the Universe and Copernicus is in error. Nevertheless Copernicus has been proven right.

    Is Giraldi Copernicus?"

    My guts answer? P. G. is R A B I D. He may bite someone, just 'cause of his first name.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. @Veritas X-
    Mr I Shamir, you are wrong, "...and by 1970, there were no Jews at the top at all.".
    According to the *JTA-Jewish Telegraphic Agency*:
    USSR leader Andropov reportedly hid Jewish roots to advance in party
    June 17, 1999 9:00am

    MOSCOW, June 17 (JTA) — Former Soviet leader Yuri Andropov had Jewish roots, according to recent reports in the Russian press. Andropov, who was in charge of the KGB for 15 years and then headed the USSR from November 1982 until his death in February 1984, concealed his Jewish background after he entered the Communist Party as a young man, according to the reports. Andropov’s mother, Yevgeniya Faynshtein, was a music teacher in southern Russia. The fate of Andropov’s father remains a mystery. His mother later remarried a Russian Greek named Andropulo. His adopted son later changed this last name to a more Russian-sounding one. Unlike many other Soviet leaders, Andropov never wrote his memoirs, which in part can be explained by his roots, say the reports. Andropov’s role in Soviet history is still open to a debate 15 years after his death. During the 1950s he served as Moscow’s ambassador to Hungary and arranged for Soviet tanks to enter Budapest to crush the Hungarian uprising of 1956. Between 1967 and 1982 while he served as head of the KGB, the Soviet secret service, he was responsible for persecuting dissidents, including members of the underground Jewish movement. Yet some credit him for exiling some of the prominent dissidents rather than jailing them — as well as for partially opening the doors for Jewish emigration to Israel in the 1970s. According to the daily newspaper Today, human rights activist Andrei Sakharov once remarked that under Andropov the KGB was the only institution in the USSR that was not corrupt. Some people speculate that had Andropov not died so soon, he would have launched reforms to pump life into the country’s stagnant economy — moves that were later made by Andropov protege Mikhail Gorbachev.
    https://www.jta.org/1999/06/17/news-opinion/ussr-leader-andropov-reportedly-hid-jewish-roots-to-advance-in-party

    Remember Mr I Shamir, Trust is Earned. Sorry. Never trusted you before and most certainly don't trust you now.

    That’s right! Trust JTA!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Veritas X-
    The fact IS, I.S. , that I remember very clearly the time before Andropov became leader of the USSR, and was the KGB boss.
    However, if I was to say so, I'd be admonished in the case I didn't name....sources.
    So.
    I used duckduckgo as my search-engine for, hopefully the least-common-restriction algorithm.
    Of course jta is i.s., a front for ((( ))).
    A few links down was, stormfront, which of course belongs to the ((( )))-group.
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Juri+Andropov+jew&t=ffcm&ia=web

    In my book, Trust is Earned.
    Regardless, you 1nce again deflect from reality and continue with diatribes.
    Your failure to address commonly known 'facts' used by many sources pre-1980's, shows once again, your....limitations.
    btw,
    I'm using the newly-founded #GDL-Gentile Defense Leagues principles.
    i.e. the #ADL's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @Israel Shamir
    That's right! Trust JTA!

    The fact IS, I.S. , that I remember very clearly the time before Andropov became leader of the USSR, and was the KGB boss.
    However, if I was to say so, I’d be admonished in the case I didn’t name….sources.
    So.
    I used duckduckgo as my search-engine for, hopefully the least-common-restriction algorithm.
    Of course jta is i.s., a front for ((( ))).
    A few links down was, stormfront, which of course belongs to the ((( )))-group.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Juri+Andropov+jew&t=ffcm&ia=web

    In my book, Trust is Earned.
    Regardless, you 1nce again deflect from reality and continue with diatribes.
    Your failure to address commonly known ‘facts’ used by many sources pre-1980′s, shows once again, your….limitations.
    btw,
    I’m using the newly-founded #GDL-Gentile Defense Leagues principles.
    i.e. the #ADL’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Skeptikal says:
    @renfro
    From 1949 to 1965 the US provided food aid to the Israelis.....and sent US agriculture experts to teach them farming practices.

    Even after stealing the most fertile farm land from Palestine , Israel still can't feed itself

    Israel - Agriculture | export.gov
    https://www.export.gov/article?id=Israel-Agriculture Jul 20, 2018 - Israel is not self-sufficient in agriculture and is dependent on imports

    Israel is a Ponzi scheme in dozens of ways.

    Very interesting link.
    Provides a lot of food for thought for BDS.
    If Israelis were as smart as the Dutch, they would be exporting agricultural and horticultural products.
    They have the sun. All they would need to do is go vertical. Of course, they would have to steal that much more water from the Pals.

    Really, Israel is kind of like the American Southwest, cities such as Phoenix: a totally unsustainable lifestyle pursued by a population who want to “green” the desert for their own enjoyment and at the expense of other people, and the earth. In other words, the American Way . . .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Anonymous[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Really, Israel is kind of like the American Southwest, cities such as Phoenix: a totally unsustainable lifestyle pursued by a population who want to “green” the desert for their own enjoyment and at the expense of other people, and the earth. In other words, the American Way . . .

    Compare the habitat and behavior of American rich prior to the Israelification of American gentry. The lifestyle of Israeli-dominated NYC rich, or the lifestyle of the Israeli-dominated Hollywood, er, sickness, are quite similar. Fact is, the lifestyle of present-day American rich is not the “American Way” at all; it is the Israeli Way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  218. Anonymous[184] • Disclaimer says:
    @Israel Shamir
    The Church of Jews fights him, anyway. It is still spiritual fight, not a tribal scuffle.

    Church of Jews?

    “For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision.” Philippians 3:3

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    Do you want to insinuate that Christians are 'the Jews'?

    See what St. Paul actually says:

    3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh (Phillipians 3:3).

    25 For circumcision benefits you if you observe the law, but if you are a lawbreaker, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26 Therefore if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will his uncircumcision not be counted as circumcision? 27 A man who is physically uncircumcised, but who fulfills the law, will judge you who are a lawbreaker in spite of having the letter of the law and circumcision. 28 For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, and true circumcision is not something visible in the flesh. 29 On the contrary, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart—by the Spirit, not the letter. That man’s praise is not from men but from God (Romans 2:25-29).

    2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love (Galatians 5:2-6).

    12 Those who want to impress people by means of the flesh are trying to compel you to be circumcised. The only reason they do this is to avoid being persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh. 14 May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which[a] the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation (Galatians 6: 11-15).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Sparkon says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    I provided a direct quotation from the co-founder of Zionism showing that by 1903 already, a plot was underway to ignite a world war by which the Jews would get Palestine.
     
    Sure, whatever floats your boat. I was wrong, you were right.

    Well thank you, but I really was hoping for a quotation or two, as I haven’t read Househofer, Mahan or Mackinder.

    Of course, there are always those who profit from war, including–strangely enough–even the munitions manufacturers, so no one should be too surprised that there is no monopoly on warmongering, nor shortage of warmongers and war profiteers, as anyone knows who’s read Smedley Butler’s classic War Is A Racket.

    Meanwhile, I did find another gem from Litman Rosenthal about an even earlier prediction of an impending “great European war” from the other co-founder of the World Zionist Organization, Dr. Theodore Herzl himself:

    HERZL’S PROPHECY ON THE GREAT WAR.

    In 1897, just before the first Zionist Congress at Basle, according to Litman Rosenthal, in his “My Siberian Diary,” Dr. Theodore Herzl made the following prophecy of a great European war:

    “It may be that Turkey will refuse or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. A European war is imminent.”

    I allowed myself an ironic smile at Herzl’s last words. He turned to me with his magic glance.

    “I see you smile,” he said. “You are sceptical of what I have told you. The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European War is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations, and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution of the Jewish Question. We must prove to them that the problem of the Orient and Palestine is one with the problems of the Jews–both must be solved together. We must prove to them that the Jewish problem is a world problem and that a world problem must be solved by the world. And the solution must be the return of Palestine to the Jewish people.”

    These words of Dr. Herzl I will never forget. Seventeen years have now passed since those words were spoken and the great moment has come. The watch in Herzl’s hand has reached the expected hour. Will those who now represent us be able to use this great moment in the interest of our people? I would like to believe that they will, but doubts assail me. Sitting here, amid the snow and ice of Siberia, far away from my brothers, I remember that summer day on the banks of the Rhine when the great prophet foretold our future, and, remembering that scene, the tears well into my eyes.

    Kuznetsk, Siberia
    Dec. 15, 1914

    (my transcription from pages of the American Messianic Fellowship magazine here:)

    Herzl’s 1896 manifesto Der Judenstaat is considered by many the promulgating document for the entire modern Zionist movement, and here he is already just a year later in 1897 predicting an imminent great European war — which is actually still 17 years in the future — so who could be blamed for thinking there might be a connection between Zionism on the one hand, and warmongering on the other?

    Of course, the bigger questions are: who has empowered the Jews, and who has profited greatly from their Zionism?

    Hint: Mightn’t it be Blighty — Perfidious Albion?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. Wouldn’t it be nice?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  221. Old Jew says:
    @bjondo
    No. Israel Shamir isn't a traitor to America. IS hasn't started any wars. IS doesn't fabricate news to start wars. IS hasn't bankrupted America. The name is irrelevant. Character is important.

    One way to look at Mr. Giraldi is this:

    …. “Mr. Giraldi is not stupid.

    Giraldi, is a talented anti-Jews writer (almost as good as the late professor William Pierce, of “National Alliance” and Turner Diaries fame).

    In a sense he is like Giordano Bruno, ready “to be burned at the stake” for his Truth.

    Here at Unz he finds strong voices of support to confirm his views.

    He can not conceive that this group of supporters is minuscule, compared to the enormous majority
    of Americans that are indifferent to his issues, or harbor opposing views.

    In science we say: Truth is not subject to the Vote. All of learned Europe “voted” that the Earth is the center of the Universe and Copernicus is in error. Nevertheless Copernicus has been proven right.

    Is Giraldi Copernicus?”

    My guts answer? P. G. is R A B I D. He may bite someone, just ’cause of his first name.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bjondo
    Hmmm. On drugs or keyboarding from a script?
    , @SolontoCroesus
    If Giraldi is so ineffective & his audience minuscule, why are you so unhinged by his writing?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. bjondo says:
    @Old Jew
    One way to look at Mr. Giraldi is this:


    .... "Mr. Giraldi is not stupid.

    Giraldi, is a talented anti-Jews writer (almost as good as the late professor William Pierce, of “National Alliance” and Turner Diaries fame).

    In a sense he is like Giordano Bruno, ready “to be burned at the stake” for his Truth.

    Here at Unz he finds strong voices of support to confirm his views.

    He can not conceive that this group of supporters is minuscule, compared to the enormous majority
    of Americans that are indifferent to his issues, or harbor opposing views.

    In science we say: Truth is not subject to the Vote. All of learned Europe “voted” that the Earth is the center of the Universe and Copernicus is in error. Nevertheless Copernicus has been proven right.

    Is Giraldi Copernicus?"

    My guts answer? P. G. is R A B I D. He may bite someone, just 'cause of his first name.

    Hmmm. On drugs or keyboarding from a script?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. @Old Jew
    One way to look at Mr. Giraldi is this:


    .... "Mr. Giraldi is not stupid.

    Giraldi, is a talented anti-Jews writer (almost as good as the late professor William Pierce, of “National Alliance” and Turner Diaries fame).

    In a sense he is like Giordano Bruno, ready “to be burned at the stake” for his Truth.

    Here at Unz he finds strong voices of support to confirm his views.

    He can not conceive that this group of supporters is minuscule, compared to the enormous majority
    of Americans that are indifferent to his issues, or harbor opposing views.

    In science we say: Truth is not subject to the Vote. All of learned Europe “voted” that the Earth is the center of the Universe and Copernicus is in error. Nevertheless Copernicus has been proven right.

    Is Giraldi Copernicus?"

    My guts answer? P. G. is R A B I D. He may bite someone, just 'cause of his first name.

    If Giraldi is so ineffective & his audience minuscule, why are you so unhinged by his writing?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Jew
    .... fear of the dark....

    an irrational fear
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. Seraphim says:
    @Anonymous
    Church of Jews?

    "For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision." Philippians 3:3
     

    Do you want to insinuate that Christians are ‘the Jews’?

    See what St. Paul actually says:

    [MORE]

    3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh (Phillipians 3:3).

    25 For circumcision benefits you if you observe the law, but if you are a lawbreaker, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26 Therefore if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will his uncircumcision not be counted as circumcision? 27 A man who is physically uncircumcised, but who fulfills the law, will judge you who are a lawbreaker in spite of having the letter of the law and circumcision. 28 For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, and true circumcision is not something visible in the flesh. 29 On the contrary, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart—by the Spirit, not the letter. That man’s praise is not from men but from God (Romans 2:25-29).

    2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love (Galatians 5:2-6).

    12 Those who want to impress people by means of the flesh are trying to compel you to be circumcised. The only reason they do this is to avoid being persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh. 14 May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which[a] the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation (Galatians 6: 11-15).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    One doesn't have to quote walls of text like an autistic Rabbi to know what the Jew Testament says. It's funny how you try to dodge the fact that your Jew-worshiping cult is comprised of pathetic Jew-wannabees.

    • "We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews." John 4:22
    • “The Jew first.” Romans 1:16
    • “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

    And wasn't it you who said above...

    Comment #148
    August 16, 2018 at 12:02 pm GMT
    @anonymous
    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.
     
    Funny watching you try to talk out of both sides of your mouth, just like the Jews you wannabee.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. Anonymous[157] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seraphim
    Do you want to insinuate that Christians are 'the Jews'?

    See what St. Paul actually says:

    3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh (Phillipians 3:3).

    25 For circumcision benefits you if you observe the law, but if you are a lawbreaker, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26 Therefore if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will his uncircumcision not be counted as circumcision? 27 A man who is physically uncircumcised, but who fulfills the law, will judge you who are a lawbreaker in spite of having the letter of the law and circumcision. 28 For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, and true circumcision is not something visible in the flesh. 29 On the contrary, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart—by the Spirit, not the letter. That man’s praise is not from men but from God (Romans 2:25-29).

    2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. 6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love (Galatians 5:2-6).

    12 Those who want to impress people by means of the flesh are trying to compel you to be circumcised. The only reason they do this is to avoid being persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh. 14 May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which[a] the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation (Galatians 6: 11-15).

    One doesn’t have to quote walls of text like an autistic Rabbi to know what the Jew Testament says. It’s funny how you try to dodge the fact that your Jew-worshiping cult is comprised of pathetic Jew-wannabees.

    • “We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22
    • “The Jew first.” Romans 1:16
    • “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

    And wasn’t it you who said above…

    Comment #148
    August 16, 2018 at 12:02 pm GMT

    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.

    Funny watching you try to talk out of both sides of your mouth, just like the Jews you wannabee.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    Echoes of history,

    You may hide under as many 'Anonymus' you want, but your idiocy of your comments will always give you away. Better stay with your 'Nordic' gods.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. Seraphim says:
    @anonymous
    Jesus was the original Bolshevist, openly advocating to destroy family and nation, e.g., Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30.

    [Jesus] rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties…The motive force behind the purity and power of this complete negation is ecstatic inspiration and enthusiastic hope of a new world. Hence his passionate attack upon everything that exists. Everything may be destroyed because God in His omnipotence will rebuild the future order…The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism. The Bolshevists, too, wish to destroy everything that exists because they regard it as hopelessly bad.

    Ludwig von Mises
    Socialism, p. 413
     
    So it's not surprising that the followers of Bolshevist Jesus were the original Communists.

    "Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them...and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need." Acts 4:32-35
     
    Bolshie Jesus is not the anti-communists friend.

    Guess who was Ludwig von Mises.
    “Ludwig von Mises was born to Jewish parents in the city of Lemberg, Galicia, Austria-Hungary (now Lviv, Ukraine). The family of his father Arthur Edler von Mises had been elevated to the Austrian nobility in the 19th century (Edler indicates a noble landless family); they had been involved in financing and constructing railroads. Ludwig’s mother, Adele (née: Landau), was a niece of Dr. Joachim Landau, a Liberal Party deputy to the Austrian Parliament…
    Later he was economic adviser to Otto von Habsburg…
    At one time, Mises praised the work of philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (aka Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum).

    Duh, a Jewish liberal aristocrat capitalist who doesn’t love Jesus and Bolshevism. What a surprise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Funny how a Jew-worshiper like you finds merely quoting another Jew offensive. You really take the cake! I'm willing to quit quoting a Jew if you're willing to quit worshiping one. Deal?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. Seraphim says:
    @Anonymous
    One doesn't have to quote walls of text like an autistic Rabbi to know what the Jew Testament says. It's funny how you try to dodge the fact that your Jew-worshiping cult is comprised of pathetic Jew-wannabees.

    • "We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews." John 4:22
    • “The Jew first.” Romans 1:16
    • “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

    And wasn't it you who said above...

    Comment #148
    August 16, 2018 at 12:02 pm GMT
    @anonymous
    Your European Nordic ancestors were pure Hebrews. All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.
     
    Funny watching you try to talk out of both sides of your mouth, just like the Jews you wannabee.

    Echoes of history,

    You may hide under as many ‘Anonymus’ you want, but your idiocy of your comments will always give you away. Better stay with your ‘Nordic’ gods.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.
     
    Good lord, man. You categorically state that western European peoples are Jews. You are out of your cotton-picking mind, on so many levels -- from genetics to religion.

    I find it just a little bit difficult to believe that an idiot of your magnitude can handle a keyboard.

    You're a joke on educated humanity, much like your Hebrew forebears.

    Blocked.
    , @Anonymous
    Do you mean the Nordic Gods that are on your lips for the next four days?

    • Tuesday, named to honor the Norse god of war, Tiu, or Tyr, the son of Odin.
    • Wednesday, named to honor Odin, or Woden, chief god in Norse mythology.
    • Thursday, named to honor Thor, Norse god of thunder.
    • Friday, named to honor the Norse goddess of love, Frigg, or Frija.

    Looks like they're your Norse Gods to honor too. Welcome to the party, pal. :)

    P.S. Why are you worshiping a Jew too?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. @Seraphim
    Echoes of history,

    You may hide under as many 'Anonymus' you want, but your idiocy of your comments will always give you away. Better stay with your 'Nordic' gods.

    All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.

    Good lord, man. You categorically state that western European peoples are Jews. You are out of your cotton-picking mind, on so many levels — from genetics to religion.

    I find it just a little bit difficult to believe that an idiot of your magnitude can handle a keyboard.

    You’re a joke on educated humanity, much like your Hebrew forebears.

    Blocked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Seraphim is the perfect illustration of the typical caliber of people attracted to the utter nonsense of Christianity: ignoble idiots, as Paul describes his dupes in the Jew Testament.

    1Corinthians 1:18-26 "For the message about the cross is nonsense...the nonsense of our preaching...Not many of you were wise by human standards...not many were noble..."
    , @Seraphim
    No, my friend. I didn't say that all European peoples are Jews. You dishonestly misquote me.
    I was not talking about Western peoples in general and not at all about 'Jews'. It was the British Israelites, Christian Identity, Aryan Nations, Identity survivalists, Kuck Klanists, 'two seeds' theorists, who invented the myth that the Anglo-Saxons are the descendants of the 'Lost Ten Tribes', the pure Hebrews, and the 'Jews' are the seed of Satan. You are just the infantile buffoons playing this myth in the circus that is the American political life, but getting angry when people laugh at you and rabidly so when they poke fun at you. No need to say that you are woefully ignorant about the matter anyway.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. Anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seraphim
    Guess who was Ludwig von Mises.
    "Ludwig von Mises was born to Jewish parents in the city of Lemberg, Galicia, Austria-Hungary (now Lviv, Ukraine). The family of his father Arthur Edler von Mises had been elevated to the Austrian nobility in the 19th century (Edler indicates a noble landless family); they had been involved in financing and constructing railroads. Ludwig's mother, Adele (née: Landau), was a niece of Dr. Joachim Landau, a Liberal Party deputy to the Austrian Parliament...
    Later he was economic adviser to Otto von Habsburg...
    At one time, Mises praised the work of philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (aka Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum).

    Duh, a Jewish liberal aristocrat capitalist who doesn't love Jesus and Bolshevism. What a surprise.

    Funny how a Jew-worshiper like you finds merely quoting another Jew offensive. You really take the cake! I’m willing to quit quoting a Jew if you’re willing to quit worshiping one. Deal?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. Anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seraphim
    Echoes of history,

    You may hide under as many 'Anonymus' you want, but your idiocy of your comments will always give you away. Better stay with your 'Nordic' gods.

    Do you mean the Nordic Gods that are on your lips for the next four days?

    • Tuesday, named to honor the Norse god of war, Tiu, or Tyr, the son of Odin.
    • Wednesday, named to honor Odin, or Woden, chief god in Norse mythology.
    • Thursday, named to honor Thor, Norse god of thunder.
    • Friday, named to honor the Norse goddess of love, Frigg, or Frija.

    Looks like they’re your Norse Gods to honor too. Welcome to the party, pal. :)

    P.S. Why are you worshiping a Jew too?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Old Jew says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    If Giraldi is so ineffective & his audience minuscule, why are you so unhinged by his writing?

    …. fear of the dark….

    an irrational fear

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Sure, sure, fear of the dark is irrational. So let's see you camp in the wilderness without the light of a fire, Bravekike.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. Anonymous[184] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    All Western European Gothic peoples are the descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes.
     
    Good lord, man. You categorically state that western European peoples are Jews. You are out of your cotton-picking mind, on so many levels -- from genetics to religion.

    I find it just a little bit difficult to believe that an idiot of your magnitude can handle a keyboard.

    You're a joke on educated humanity, much like your Hebrew forebears.

    Blocked.

    Seraphim is the perfect illustration of the typical caliber of people attracted to the utter nonsense of Christianity: ignoble idiots, as Paul describes his dupes in the Jew Testament.

    1Corinthians 1:18-26 “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…”

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Seraphim is the perfect illustration of the typical caliber of people attracted to the utter nonsense of Christianity: ignoble idiots, as Paul describes his dupes in the Jew Testament.

     

    Well, yes, as always. Yeshuans, semi-Yeshuans, and Yeshuans-in-name-only constitute probably 50% of US citizens, and 90% of generic messicans residing in the USA. Thus, they are perpetually a potent political component of the general population.

    It is, sometimes, interesting to question Yeshuans as to their beliefs -- such beliefs as they are able to verbalize, of course. There is almost always some significant deviation in what the Yeshuan-on-the-street actually believes -- actually thinks he or she understands -- and official doctrine and definition of almost any of the popular sects, from Roman Catholics to your basic spooky evangelicals.

    It's not their fault. They're stupid and credulous. Their credulity is played to advantage by those who seek political advantage -- curs of many stripes, ever-corrupt, ever-perverted, ever-destructive of sane human society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. @Anonymous
    Seraphim is the perfect illustration of the typical caliber of people attracted to the utter nonsense of Christianity: ignoble idiots, as Paul describes his dupes in the Jew Testament.

    1Corinthians 1:18-26 "For the message about the cross is nonsense...the nonsense of our preaching...Not many of you were wise by human standards...not many were noble..."

    Seraphim is the perfect illustration of the typical caliber of people attracted to the utter nonsense of Christianity: ignoble idiots, as Paul describes his dupes in the Jew Testament.

    Well, yes, as always. Yeshuans, semi-Yeshuans, and Yeshuans-in-name-only constitute probably 50% of US citizens, and 90% of generic messicans residing in the USA. Thus, they are perpetually a potent political component of the general population.

    It is, sometimes, interesting to question Yeshuans as to their beliefs — such beliefs as they are able to verbalize, of course. There is almost always some significant deviation in what the Yeshuan-on-the-street actually believes — actually thinks he or she understands — and official doctrine and definition of almost any of the popular sects, from Roman Catholics to your basic spooky evangelicals.

    It’s not their fault. They’re stupid and credulous. Their credulity is played to advantage by those who seek political advantage — curs of many stripes, ever-corrupt, ever-perverted, ever-destructive of sane human society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. Anonymous[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old Jew
    .... fear of the dark....

    an irrational fear

    Sure, sure, fear of the dark is irrational. So let’s see you camp in the wilderness without the light of a fire, Bravekike.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. Old Jew says:

    SolontoCroessus asked me:

    If Giraldi is so ineffective & his audience minuscule, why are you so unhinged by his writing?

    I answered:

    “…. fear of the dark….

    an irrational fear

    I was talking about my own guts feelings, emotions, etc.

    Though rationally I realize that the Giraldi crowd is minuscule,
    I harbor an irrational fear, same as my fear of the dark as a child.

    [My childhood memories go back to 1945, the end of the war, Russia/Romania]

    My particular sub-thread started with “Israel Shamir” ostentatiously flaunting his handle “Israel” while proclaiming his admiration for Giraldi.

    [I could not but notice that, Mr. Giraldi gets triggered just by the mention of that word].

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. Anonymous[260] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old Jew
    SolontoCroessus asked me:

    If Giraldi is so ineffective & his audience minuscule, why are you so unhinged by his writing?

    I answered:

    "…. fear of the dark….

    an irrational fear
    "

    I was talking about my own guts feelings, emotions, etc.

    Though rationally I realize that the Giraldi crowd is minuscule,
    I harbor an irrational fear, same as my fear of the dark as a child.

    [My childhood memories go back to 1945, the end of the war, Russia/Romania]

    My particular sub-thread started with "Israel Shamir" ostentatiously flaunting his handle "Israel" while proclaiming his admiration for Giraldi.

    [I could not but notice that, Mr. Giraldi gets triggered just by the mention of that word].
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. @Skeptikal
    "She said that Israeli women are treated like blacks in Jim Crow states/times. I think this is a clear proof she is certifiably insane, and should be committed, not just retired."

    How so? this looks to me like a sign of sanity, actually.
    Israeli men are patriarchal jerks. Israeli women (a lot of them, anyhow) are expected to produce droves of children, wear wigs, have sex once/week, on Friday, the husband first going through a whole religious routine to "get in the mood" . . .
    Ugh.

    Apparently you never visited Israel. Jewish women are very assertive, and Jewish men are quite meek in comparison to them. If we were able to control our women, controlling the world would be an easy thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Even worse are the JAPs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. Skeptikal says:

    I have never been to Israel, but there are Jewish woman all over the place!
    Certainly Jewish women can be very bossy. The Jewish mother meme didn’t come out of nowehre.
    But, this kind of “back leading” is not really controlling the world.
    IMHO.
    As for “*our* women” . . . everyone at UR operates on the default assumption that he is talking to other H sapiens of the masculine persuasion. ;-)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments