The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
The "Globalists" Love Gefilte Fish
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_712279462

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Our grandparents faced a quandary when they had to describe some body parts or physical activity. The ‘obscene words’ remained taboo at least until D.H. Lawrence broke the prohibition in Lady Chatterley’s Lover, and the four-letter words became printable only recently. However, now we have new banned words, or words one can use only at one’s own peril.

‘The Jews’ is such a word. Speaking about the Jews is fraught with consequences. Jews do not like to be referred to, unless in extremely flattering terms. You are likely to be banned in Facebook and other social networks for referring to ‘Jews’. You can be fired. Even a hundred years ago it was a troublesome step, likely to cause social ostracism.

Therefore, there is a permanent demand for euphemisms.

  • “Semite” is an early and enduring euphemism of the 19th century which is still with us thanks to “anti-Semitism”.
  • The Clergy prefer to write ‘Masons’ instead of ‘Jews’.
  • ‘Khazar’ or ‘Khazarian’ is popular in the networks, thanks to Arthur Koestler, the author of The Thirteenth Tribe. He claimed modern Jews were the descendants of the Turkic Khazars who were Judaised in 12th century.
  • The nickname ‘Ashkenazi’ originally referred to the Jews of Central Europe; the East European Jews of Lithuanian and Ukrainian origin gladly accepted it despite the German Jews’ objections. Nowadays it is just an euphemism for a Jew, with an extra bonus: not-very-prominent (outside trade and money) Oriental Jews will gladly join in Ashkenazi denunciation.
  • ‘Zionist’ is a popular term of use and abuse, as in “Jews are fine, it is Zionists whom I dislike”.
  • “Reptilian” or ‘Illuminati’ are the words used when all the rest fail.

There is one big problem with these words. They clearly show that you are afraid to write the J word. And they know how to deal with frightened persons. It is enough to murmur in response, “It’s an antisemitic slur”, and the guy will collapse in a paroxysm of denial. There is a second problem: it makes very little sense to call the Bolshevik Jews “Zionists.”

The Jews themselves have proposed a few euphemisms of their own: ‘Hebrews’ or ‘Israelites’ were the preferred ones, but they didn’t make much inroad in the English-speaking world. However, ‘Hebrews’ became the official designation of Jews in Russia, while the ‘Jews’ moniker had been outlawed, though it survived in Poland and the Ukraine.

Now the US has produced a new word: “globalists.” The Huffington Post called the tweet of Donald Trump about the dismissal of “globalist Gary Cohen” – anti-Semitic. It turns out that a “globalist” is just a Jew. For example, globalists like gefilte fish.

This neologism pleased Ann Coulter, and she amused her numerous readers with her tweets: “Paul Newman is only half globalist,” “How many globalists came under the distribution in the fight against male assault and harassment!”, “Israel is the last refuge of globalists.” These Tweets received thousands of likes and reposts, and caused an angry condemnation … of globalists.

Mahmud Abbas, the president of Palestine, created an euphemism accidentally. He called the US Ambassador to Israel a “son of a bitch”, and His Excellence Right Honourable Ambassador David Friedman said it is was an “antisemitic slur”.

A propos, the creation of euphemisms is a very Jewish way to deal with taboos. At first, the Jews banned the Name of God יהוה, and then they banned the substitute, and the substitute of the substitute, and the substitute of the substitute of the substitute. Nowadays, the religious Jews refer to ‘God’ in writing in an oblique way.

The whole of political correctness (PC) grew out of extrapolating this Jewish attitude to other groups. In the PC culture, the word ‘Negro’ was displaced by “Black”, and then by ‘black’ in low case, and then by “Afro-American”. Thus PC had created a new fence around the ban.

The idea of fences is another Jewish concept. A Jew is forbidden to pick fruit on the Sabbath. Fine! Then, the Jews created a fence around this prohibition forbidding the climbing of an apple tree on the Sabbath. The idea is: if you climb on an apple tree, you may be tempted to pick an apple. And then they built another fence, forbidding the climbing of any tree one the Sabbath. Otherwise, you’ll get used to climbing a pine on the Sabbath, and one day you’ll climb an apple tree.

PC is this additional fence. If today you refer to a black person, tomorrow you will be tempted to refer to Jews. And if you refer to Jews, perhaps you will do so in unflattering terms. The concept of micro-insults and micro-aggressions completes the fence.

And now we have a new fence: a reference to ‘bankers’, ‘moneylenders’ and even ‘globalists’ has become forbidden, as in the case of George Soros. The Hungarians referred to him as a “globalist banker” and the Jewish world rushed to his defence. Not that he is liked by his fellow Jews, he isn’t, but they have to fight the breach in the fence. You know the logic: today you call Soros ‘’a globalist’, and tomorrow you will call a Jew – a Jew.

President Putin did just that. In an interview with Megyn Kelly, he answered her question about the 13 Russians who were indicted by Mueller for alleged interference in the elections: “They do not represent the interests of the Russian state. Maybe they are not Russians, but Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews with Russian citizenship. Check it out.”

He was attacked ferociously. The leading Jewish organization ADL (Anti-Defamation League) referred to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (this is their standard response whenever a Jew is mentioned), and added, “Don’t you dare blame the Jews for interfering in American elections!”

This is especially piquant – if there is a foreign country that actively interferes in the US politics and elections, it is primarily the Jewish state and its supporters. American friends of Israel, Sheldon Adelson and Jeff Katzenberg are the largest donors; and in general Jews spent more money on presidential elections in the US than on helping needy Jews. Israeli diplomats are actively interfering in American elections at all levels, as the Jewish website Mondoweiss writes. But you can mention that only in marginal publications on the verge of a ban from Google and Twitter.

And in Israel, the energetic young MK Xenia Svetlova, (a Knesset Member for the Zionist Union), accused Putin of anti-Semitism and called upon Netanyahu to ‘protect the Jews’. It’s nothing personal – Xenia grew up in Moscow, worked for Russian TV channels, even loved Russia, but when she went into politics, she had to prove that she was not a Putin stooge. And she calls for Israeli intervention in Syria against Assad and Putin, and for the condemnation of Putin’s anti-Semitism.

ORDER IT NOW

The Tatars and Ukrainians did not resent Putin’s words. The Russian Jews in Russia dismissed it, too. For a good reason: the taboo on the word ‘Jew’ is not universal. It does not exist in Russia. Russia is the land of many native ethnicities, a hundred and fifty or so, from Yakut to Mordva, and people freely refer to all of them without fear. The Jews in Russia are just another ethnicity, or ethnos, or nation, one of many. ‘Russians’ in Russia connote members of Russian ethnicity, the most numerous nation of the Russian Federation, not the citizens of Russia, as you would expect.

This attitude may surprise an American, or a Frenchman. It is not totally unknown in Europe, where Walloons and Flemings populate Belgium, and Catalans and Basques live in Spain. Still, a Frenchman of Brittany or Provence is a Frenchman first, and a Breton or Provençal a distant second. In the US, ‘ethnicity’ is a domain of recent immigrants, Greeks or Poles; the Americans have race and religion as identity-forming factors.

In Russia the ethnic identity has been enforced since Stalin’s days: it was actually recorded on the ID. I explain this by Stalin’s personal perceptions: a native of Georgia, the country in Transcaucasia, he was brought up in the local tradition of ethnic awareness. For Russians proper, this ethnic identity is of little importance. They know of it, but do not consider it greatly important. That is why in modern Russia ‘ethnicity’ is not registered on the ID anymore.

Of course, Megyn Kelly, while referring to ‘Russians’ indicted by Mueller, had meant ‘citizens of Russia’, and not ‘ethnic Russians’. Me myself, like the majority of old émigrés, also refer to “Russians” meaning people in Russia or from Russia, or even people from the former Soviet Union. In Israel, every person whose origins are in the USSR is called ‘Russian’, to the chagrin of Russian Jews. They would like to be called ‘Jews’ in Israel, and ‘Russians’ in Russia, but alas, it is other way around, they are called ‘Jews’ in Russia and ‘Russians’ in Israel.

Russian ethnic nationalists of the kind embraced by my colleague Anatoly Karlin would like to keep the ethnonym ‘Russians’ just for themselves, but they are harmless, you can disregard their whines – they aren’t globalists for you.

Now, for the first time ever, the Russians are being trained to stick to American word usage. This is done by Facebook, a platform that millions of Russians use. Besides opening Russia for American business and stealing its data, Facebook is a powerful enforcer of PC in Russian minds. Whenever you refer to blacks, Jews, or even Ukrainians you risk being banned for a week or a month.

As unusual this attitude is for the Russians, they are susceptible for training, as we all are. These small punishments go a long way to bring Jewish hegemony to Russia. Beside protecting Jews, or Blacks from micro-insults, the banning of words has a powerful impact on the mind. Whoever tells you what you may or may not say, is a person of authority. This way of subduing people to your command is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), and the CIA is on the forefront of using this black magic of words.

Israelis, and Jews in general do not accept these taboos. It is perfectly all right for Israelis and Jews to refer to ‘Jews’, or worse. The late Israeli MK Ze’evi, a popular right-winger minister, called Martin Indyk, the US Ambassador in Israel, a ‘Jewboy” (יהודון); Netanyahu’s aide called another US Ambassador a ‘Jewboy’, too. Israelis speak freely of blacks; they do not speak only, but deport them as well. They do not mind banning non-Jews from renting apartments quite openly, too. This disregard of taboo gives Jews an additional power in dealing with Gentiles, like a disregard of the Matrix gave supernatural powers to Neo.

The Palestinians disregard the taboo, too. They do not hesitate shouting “Jews are coming”, when Israeli soldiers on their jeeps roll into their villages. Americans of Palestinian origin are scrupulous with their observance, they never utter the forbidden J-word, (unless they want to say something nice about a Jewish friend), otherwise they speak of ‘Zionists’. That is why Palestinians in Palestine are free, and Palestinians in the US are not, like all Americans.

This taboo should be broken. Until it is done, the Jews will continue to dominate the discourse and the US society, the Palestinians will suffer, the bankers will grow fat and prosperous, legal and illegal immigration will continue unabated. Saying “Jew” will have a liberating effect, like mouthing the name of Rumpelstiltskin. And it is much shorter.

Israel Shamir can be reached at [email protected]

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 
Hide 106 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Well?
    French did have, and I still think they have problem with the world earth.
    There Shakespeare did say something about rose, but I do not remember.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You could have just put "rose Shakespeare" in Google and perhaps the first choice addition "Romeo" and you would have it "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. wayfarer says:

    “Marxist Murderers”

    “Bloody History of Communism and Cultural Marxism”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. anon[373] • Disclaimer says:

    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has “Nazi” in it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tsar Nicholas

    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has “Nazi” in it?
     
    Israel's whole article made me laugh out loud and your comment was the icing on the cake!

    Thank you.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    'Ashkenazi' is Hebrew for Germans.
    , @MEFOBILLS
    I used to think Nazi was a slur word, but it looks like its a contraction:

    In German Nazi is the abreviation of "Nazional Zozialist

    Same goes for Gestapo:

    "Ge sta po" is an abreviation of GEheime STAats POlizei
    , @TheJester
    Playing with words that mean something ...

    What few people appreciate is that the Nazis got their political, ethnic, and tribal paradigms from the Jews. The Nazis were a reactionary lot reacting to their political, economic, and social experiences in the Weimar Republic. Cowering under the economic and cultural "boot" of the Jews, in self-defense they forthrightly adopted the Jewish "tribal" paradigm and applied it to the Germans ... previously among the most open-minded and least nationalistic of the peoples in the ethnic melting pot called Central and Eastern Europe.

    Hence, it is not strange to find disturbing similarities between Zionist and Nazi ideologies. They have the same social and historical roots: a threatened and wounded populace reorganizing and reemerging as a "revanche" society (the root is "revenge") ... going through seemingly endless cycles of being debased followed by active revauchism.

    While the Germans are lately prone to acts of cultural and national suicide as penance for their last revanche(ment) against the Jews, the Jews have sought safety and dissimulation in presenting themselves as a permanent "victim group" who are objects of world-wide hate for apparently no reason at all. They have conveniently forgotten their historical crimes against the peoples of Eastern and Central Europe, and more recently, their on-going crimes against the non-Jewish population of the United States.

    Hence, it is tempting to see the Jews as engaging in seemingly endless cycles of self-immolation as they react to the seemingly endless cycles of revanchism on the part of virtually every other ethnic group with which they have had contact across the millenniums. However, for some reason, Jews like to interpret this as evidence of a sacred ennui that identifies them as "God's chosen people" ... which only prepares them for their next cycle of debasing a local population followed by the latter's inevitable revanchism in self-defense.

    The question is, who has the power to stop this stupidity? Those guilty of debasing or those guilty of revanchism?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. ValmMond says:

    Those whose name shall never be mentioned. But who shall be always obeyed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. As Shamir well knows, the jews’ do not exist.
    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews, and not even all of them.
    In the USA non asjkenazi jews have quite different political views.
    In the Netherlands we have ‘Een Ander Joods Geluid’, best translated with ‘a different jewish opinion’, an organistion that strongly criticises Israel.
    They’re seen as traitors by the pro Israel group.
    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir

    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews
     
    what about BHL (Bernard Henri Levy)? Not an ashkenazi, but as bad as any!
    Derrida? (same) Levayev? All Sephardi slave traders of 17th century?
    , @Colleen Pater
    some jews are commies some bankers some globalists some nationalists some religious some not etc. But when it comes to deconstructing the west to their own benefit they work just like the leftists they trained, they put aside their differences and destroy the opposition. The jews that are not like this of any prominence can be counted on your fingers.But their is not a whit of difference between the neocon jews and the soros jews or any far left jews you can choose or far right oe ultra capitalist jews you can name.
    And this is THE PROBLEM.they do not assimilate they infiltrate
    , @Seamus Padraig

    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.
     
    Well, the Jews in Israel and Ukraine seem to be co-operating quite nicely, as are the resident Jews over at The Guardian.
    , @renfro

    with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA
     
    It is not as small a group as you think.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. If I catch anyone here using the word “Jew,” he or she is in serious trouble. You must say “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”

    Read More
    • LOL: Z-man
    • Replies: @Israel Shamir

    “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”
     
    This is so fifties!
    , @jilles dykstra
    Cannot see anything rootless or cosmopolitan in the video of the link, just David and Goliath in reverse
    https://www.rt.com/news/422254-israel-gaza-strike-border/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. CalDre says:

    Largely witty article but as to the substantive matters:

    * “Semite” is rarely used, whereas “anti-Semitism” is used, almost universally by those who desire to censor, with the usage having no logical connection to what it connotes (a desire to “exterminate” or at a minimum a fanatical hatred) or to the group it designates (Semites, which is largely Arabs, the true victims of Jewish anti-Semitism).
    * “Masons” is entirely orthogonal to Jews. Masons are secret societies of non-Jews which were used (and still are used) by the Blue Bloods as their primary (and very effective) control mechanism.
    * “Khazar” is hardly used and few know what it means.
    * “Ashkenazi” is largely synonymous with Khazars, but also is not used except amongst those who are Jews or who study Jews.
    * “Zionist” is not at all a synonym for Jews, though a few of lesser intelligence will use it with that connotation. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge of the world knows that a great many Zionists are non-Jews, though one might argue they are all Jew toadies (even unwitting ones, like the readers of the fraudulent Scofield Reference Bible). And of course some number of Jews, unfortunately relatively small, are not Zionists (a/k/a violent Jew supremacists).
    * “Reptilian” is not related to Jews either, though it is related to the “underworld” and many may believe Kabbalistic Jews have greater connections to this underworld than, say, Catholics. But let’s be honest, “New Yorker” is not a synonym for Jew either.
    * “Illuminati” is like Zionists, it includes Jews and non-Jews (as well as excluding some Jews), though a different set from each group. It is basically a combination of two organized groups: the Elders (Jewish royalty) and their Jew followers, and the Blue Bloods (White royalty) and their masonic followers. Together they pack a massive whallop.

    Though Mr. Shamir forgot “tribalist”, I will grant, this most often refers to Jews. “Neo-con”, on the other hand, is more akin to “fanatical Zionist”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rosamond Vincy
    "Coasties"?

    I've met Italian Catholics from LawnGuyland who use more Yiddish than Jews who grew up in midwestern small towns.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. @Allenbard Woodison
    If I catch anyone here using the word "Jew," he or she is in serious trouble. You must say "Rootless Cosmopolitan."

    “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”

    This is so fifties!

    Read More
    • Replies: @RebelWriter
    "European Style Socialists" was popularized by Wayne LaPierre of the NRA.
    , @Anthony Clifton
    sounds a little more sanitary

    leaves out the actual costs, in 1950's "dollars"of the "Jewish" narrative"
    in the hundreds of millions lives, and trillions of "dollars"


    https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2018/03/24/omnibus-spending-bill-the-locusts-are-winning/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. @jilles dykstra
    As Shamir well knows, the jews' do not exist.
    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews, and not even all of them.
    In the USA non asjkenazi jews have quite different political views.
    In the Netherlands we have 'Een Ander Joods Geluid', best translated with 'a different jewish opinion', an organistion that strongly criticises Israel.
    They're seen as traitors by the pro Israel group.
    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews

    what about BHL (Bernard Henri Levy)? Not an ashkenazi, but as bad as any!
    Derrida? (same) Levayev? All Sephardi slave traders of 17th century?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Jews believe in a massive conspiracy theory that anti-Jewish feeling is due to anything except their own behaviour.

    Read More
    • Replies: @BR549
    That single sentence of yours conveys millennia of human misery; one small group of selfish xenophobes, who see their lack of personal integrity as a virtue, have managed to dominate the planet simply by exploiting those deep-seated human traits that the rest of the world had hoped to evolve beyond. Perhaps for that reason, the Jews are a reminder that we have NOT evolved, as an entire race, nearly as far as we think we have. An albatross upon the neck of humanity seems more fitting.

    When I speak of the Jews, in this sense, I am referring to those who, when forced to choose between God and supporting their internal religious politics ......... will ALWAYS choose their politics. Who knows what the actual ratio of good to bad Jews is, but like their equally challenged Islamic brethren, they will continue to chastise any of even their own who don't toe the party line. That doesn't sound very God-like to me.

    I've always believed that the allegory of Abraham was meant to address the inherent violent nature of all those Middle-Eastern tribesmen who had this genetic propensity to slaughter their neighbors and never forgive them as enemies. Sound familiar? Whether we are talking Arabs or Jews, it's SSDD, yet their perpetual battle has become a means for the rest of humanity to view the fossilized remains of human spiritual development. As long as there is this "us vs. them" mindset, we can continually remind ourselves how little we have advanced in the last 4,000 years or so.

    Had anyone actually been paying any attention instead of falling victim to their own ego, they would have recognized the need to see Ishmael as part of the family of Abraham. Hagar's use as a surrogate to continue the tribal bloodline was an accepted practice back then and Sarah's problematic infertility was merely a way to force illiterate tribesmen sitting by a late night campfire to wrestle with the perceived definitions of just who was worthy of assuming a tribal identity. The writers of the O.T. were brilliant in that way because they saw no improvement in hostilities ........ until the issue was brought closer to home.

    Then too, one must have two points in order to set a course. Without respecting their nomadic tribal roots as a foundation, they would have no home port from which to set a direction to any higher ideal. The majority of so-called "religious" followers (on all sides) completely ignore the dysfunctionality of the House of Abraham. It was no different than a 3,000 year old soap opera, and individuals would instead use the allegory to justify their continued unconscious enslavement within their own arrested spiritual development.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. @Allenbard Woodison
    If I catch anyone here using the word "Jew," he or she is in serious trouble. You must say "Rootless Cosmopolitan."

    Cannot see anything rootless or cosmopolitan in the video of the link, just David and Goliath in reverse

    https://www.rt.com/news/422254-israel-gaza-strike-border/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Renoman says:

    My fave is “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”! You forgot so many, kikes, Hitler was right, motherfuckers, Father fuckers, Cock suckers, Democrats, aw well you get it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. @anon
    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has "Nazi" in it?

    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has “Nazi” in it?

    Israel’s whole article made me laugh out loud and your comment was the icing on the cake!

    Thank you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. @jilles dykstra
    As Shamir well knows, the jews' do not exist.
    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews, and not even all of them.
    In the USA non asjkenazi jews have quite different political views.
    In the Netherlands we have 'Een Ander Joods Geluid', best translated with 'a different jewish opinion', an organistion that strongly criticises Israel.
    They're seen as traitors by the pro Israel group.
    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    some jews are commies some bankers some globalists some nationalists some religious some not etc. But when it comes to deconstructing the west to their own benefit they work just like the leftists they trained, they put aside their differences and destroy the opposition. The jews that are not like this of any prominence can be counted on your fingers.But their is not a whit of difference between the neocon jews and the soros jews or any far left jews you can choose or far right oe ultra capitalist jews you can name.
    And this is THE PROBLEM.they do not assimilate they infiltrate

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. nickels says:

    Where I grew up we called the jew, on the one hand, ‘pinko commie fags’, while, at the same time, ‘God’s chosen people’.
    Very cognitive dissonance’y.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. EL Doctorow, in his novel “Ragtime”, named his main Jewish character Baron Ashkenazi. The Baron was a cinema pioneer who started out as a silhouette artist selling his art on the street on the lower east side of NYC and being referred to only as “Tateh” before his transformation into a wealthy studio owner.

    That was the first reference I remember seeing to the Ashkenazi euphemism and it stuck with me for decades. In the small southern town where I lived as a child, there were two Jewish families, and the fathers of both families were store owners. It wasn’t considered rude to refer to them as jews if I recall correctly. It was, though, a common practice to accuse gentile business people of being jews if they were dishonest or too shrewd in their business practices.

    “Jew” was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, “I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    “Jew” was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, “I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200.”
     
    There's one I never hear anymore! Unlike, say, 'gyp'. But then, I guess that means that the Gypsies just don't have much of a lobby ... too busy pickin' pockets and telling fortunes, I suppose.
    , @Macon Richardson
    I, too, growing up in the south in the 1940s and 1950s knew only the term "to jew him down." I was at university before I knew what a Jew was. I got that information from a Yankee Jew who was dating my cousin.

    I knew that some of my friends were Jews but didn't know what that meant. To me, Jews in my school and neighborhood were like Lebanese, Syrians, Greeks and Italians, people who had a darker complexion than us kids who were of English and Scots descent.

    I suppose that because we had Negroes to blame for all the world's ills, we didn't need Jews to blame.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Israel Shamir

    “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”
     
    This is so fifties!

    “European Style Socialists” was popularized by Wayne LaPierre of the NRA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Well?
    French did have, and I still think they have problem with the world earth.
    There Shakespeare did say something about rose, but I do not remember.

    You could have just put “rose Shakespeare” in Google and perhaps the first choice addition “Romeo” and you would have it “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @anon
    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has "Nazi" in it?

    ‘Ashkenazi’ is Hebrew for Germans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    No, Ashkenazi comes from 'Ashkenazi', who was believed to have kingdom in Scythia - a Northern region.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @jilles dykstra
    As Shamir well knows, the jews' do not exist.
    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews, and not even all of them.
    In the USA non asjkenazi jews have quite different political views.
    In the Netherlands we have 'Een Ander Joods Geluid', best translated with 'a different jewish opinion', an organistion that strongly criticises Israel.
    They're seen as traitors by the pro Israel group.
    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    Well, the Jews in Israel and Ukraine seem to be co-operating quite nicely, as are the resident Jews over at The Guardian.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    I explicitly mentioned cooperation for the last world war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. The zionists rule America , the proof of this is that Israel and its zionist neocons and the deep state did 911 and got away with it, you know who rules you when you are afraid to say their name.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. @Twodees Partain
    EL Doctorow, in his novel "Ragtime", named his main Jewish character Baron Ashkenazi. The Baron was a cinema pioneer who started out as a silhouette artist selling his art on the street on the lower east side of NYC and being referred to only as "Tateh" before his transformation into a wealthy studio owner.

    That was the first reference I remember seeing to the Ashkenazi euphemism and it stuck with me for decades. In the small southern town where I lived as a child, there were two Jewish families, and the fathers of both families were store owners. It wasn't considered rude to refer to them as jews if I recall correctly. It was, though, a common practice to accuse gentile business people of being jews if they were dishonest or too shrewd in their business practices.

    "Jew" was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, "I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200."

    “Jew” was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, “I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200.”

    There’s one I never hear anymore! Unlike, say, ‘gyp’. But then, I guess that means that the Gypsies just don’t have much of a lobby … too busy pickin’ pockets and telling fortunes, I suppose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Yep, as in "He jewed me down, but I still managed to gyp him on the deal." ahaha
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. With deference to Monty Python, my all-time favorite euphemism for the Jews is ‘Red Sea pedestrian’:

    The whole of political correctness (PC) grew out of extrapolating this Jewish attitude to other groups.

    As did the whole nauseating concept of collective, hereditary guilt.

    This disregard of taboo gives Jews an additional power in dealing with Gentiles, like a disregard of the Matrix gave supernatural powers to Neo.

    Exactly. And it makes so many goyim envious of them and want to be like them. It’s kind of like the way blacks are allowed to be casually misogynistic, but we’re not. Young boys then grow up thinking blacks are ‘cool’ and want to be like them. The obvious–if subconscious–inference being made by white children is that, if they ever want to speak their minds and say what comes naturally, they had better disavow their whiteness and their Goy-heit. Very clever.

    The Palestinians disregard the taboo, too. They do not hesitate shouting “Jews are coming”, when Israeli soldiers on their jeeps roll into their villages. Americans of Palestinian origin are scrupulous with their observance, they never utter the forbidden J-word, (unless they want to say something nice about a Jewish friend), otherwise they speak of ‘Zionists’. That is why Palestinians in Palestine are free, and Palestinians in the US are not, like all Americans.

    Under ZOG, we are all Palestinians. At least Ahed Tamimi and her ilk over there in Palestine proper are doing something about it. Meanwhile, we’re just sitting around over here getting diddled up the ass. Sad …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Despite my own defense of Israel’s right to exist., When I consider the political ramifications, I would tend to a view that it is far more likely that AIPAC and Israel by extension has more cause and force to interfere with US elections. President Trump and is not proposing laws prohibiting US citizens from criticizing Russia or Great Britain. But a substantial effort is being made to violate the the free expression of US citizens regarding Israel.

    I was reading an article on Israeli business practices and ethos and what seems to be a national ethic of condoning and promoting those who engage it. I refrained from posting it in comments because of the heavy indictment about this aspect of the national character of Israel, written by a Jew living in Israel. Is my desire not to post it merely fear or the avoidance of the inflammatory responses that it might engender or the two considerations one in the same. I have to think on that.

    I agree that at some point, fear of criticizing Israel is detrimental to a fair and healthy rendering of the issues.

    Caveat: comment designed merely to be inflammatory can be just as unhelpful.

    I love the word locks, but salmon by any other name is still salmnon

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. BTW, for those who missed it, C.J. Hopkins also recently did a piece on the new ‘globalist’ taboo: http://www.unz.com/article/then-they-came-for-the-globalists/

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Thank you.
    "Anybody using words like “globalist,” “global capitalism,” or “neoliberal,” or suggesting that anyone voted for Trump or Brexit for any reason other than racism, you can pretty much rest assured that they’re Nazis. Also, anyone writing about “banks” or the “deep state.” Absolutely Nazis. Oh yeah, and the “corporate media,” naturally. Only Putin-Nazis talk like that. Oh, and definitely anyone who hasn’t spent the last two years attacking Trump (as if there has been anything else to focus on), or has implied that “the Russians” aren’t out to destroy us, or that the historical moment we are living through might be just a bit more complex than that … well, you know what they’re really saying. They’re saying, “we need to exterminate the Jews.”
    The paper (http://www.unz.com/article/then-they-came-for-the-globalists/) should be on a reading list for Jonathan Anomaly & Nathan Cofnas (http://www.unz.com/article/what-the-alt-right-gets-wrong-about-jews/)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Anonymous[277] • Disclaimer says:

    Shamir writes a lot but never seems to say much. Massive profits in saying a lot so the slaves won’t understand anything and will mindlessly do what they are told. The zombies are growing in obedience because many of them walk around and when prompted will say things like “mm-hmm Soros”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. At the March 2, 2018 conference, The Israel Lobby and American Policy 2018 March 2, 2018 at the National Press Club, Washington, D.C., Gideon Levy called the American “Israeli Lobby” by its correct description: the Jewish Lobby. He claimed that American Jews were the biggest enemy of Israel and that they were corrupting Israel.

    This is a critical insight that is usually mischaracterized as Israelis exerting too much influence and corrupting our political process. For the most part, it’s not Israelis who are responsible for the corruption of the American political system; it’s American Jews. Yes, there are a few Israelis or dual citizens; however, the vast majority of the Lobby and their hundreds of organizations are American Jews.

    Even John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt titled their breakthrough book the more publicly palatable “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis. If you can’t properly identify the source of the influence you can’t properly counter it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis "
    The book identifies AIPAC as the lobby for Israel, not by Israelis.
    , @Another Realist
    You are right. I have no problem with Jews in Israel. They are trying to build their own homeland and are not trying to sell out anyone's country. The problem I have is with Jews in the US and Western Europe. They're the ones trying to destroy western countries from within by promoting open borders, identity politics, victim mentality and warmongering neocon ideals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Seamus Padraig

    “Jew” was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, “I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200.”
     
    There's one I never hear anymore! Unlike, say, 'gyp'. But then, I guess that means that the Gypsies just don't have much of a lobby ... too busy pickin' pockets and telling fortunes, I suppose.

    Yep, as in “He jewed me down, but I still managed to gyp him on the deal.” ahaha

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. There is a lot of criticism of Jewish behavior and most of it is justified.
    But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. Promoting trade resulted in accelerating progress of the society.
    Behavior of Jews was greatly influenced by what did happen in Medina.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Whataboutism
    We do have to credit them with the invention of copper wire even if it was just because of two Jews fighting over a penny.
    , @jilles dykstra
    " But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. "
    Pity that almost everywhere the non jewish population either did not see the good, or saw good just for jews.
    , @Another Realist
    Don't try to white wash things. Jews are not promoting "trade", they are promoting greed, supported by unlimited supply of 3rd world cheap labor through open borders. They are also promoting narcissism through identity politics and victim mentality, leading to chaos and discord all over the western world.
    , @HogHappenin
    covering for the "globalists" I see!! ;) ;)

    By the way, Jews were spread across, not only the greater middle east, but some of them had even reached European shores before "Medina" was ever a city of any significance!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. annamaria says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    BTW, for those who missed it, C.J. Hopkins also recently did a piece on the new 'globalist' taboo: http://www.unz.com/article/then-they-came-for-the-globalists/

    Thank you.
    “Anybody using words like “globalist,” “global capitalism,” or “neoliberal,” or suggesting that anyone voted for Trump or Brexit for any reason other than racism, you can pretty much rest assured that they’re Nazis. Also, anyone writing about “banks” or the “deep state.” Absolutely Nazis. Oh yeah, and the “corporate media,” naturally. Only Putin-Nazis talk like that. Oh, and definitely anyone who hasn’t spent the last two years attacking Trump (as if there has been anything else to focus on), or has implied that “the Russians” aren’t out to destroy us, or that the historical moment we are living through might be just a bit more complex than that … well, you know what they’re really saying. They’re saying, “we need to exterminate the Jews.”
    The paper (http://www.unz.com/article/then-they-came-for-the-globalists/) should be on a reading list for Jonathan Anomaly & Nathan Cofnas (http://www.unz.com/article/what-the-alt-right-gets-wrong-about-jews/)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Don Bacon says:

    Israel has never called itself a Jewish State, but that will change.
    news report, Mar 15, 2018

    Nazareth, Israel – After seven years of delays, the Israeli governing parties have agreed the final terms of controversial new legislation that would define Israel exclusively as “the nation-state of the Jewish people”.
    The bill is now expected to be fast-tracked through the Israeli parliament and on to the statute books in the coming weeks.
    Approval by the parliament’s justice committee this week of the Basic Law, which carries much greater weight than normal legislation, marks a dangerous turning-point for Palestinians, according to analysts.
    Amir Ohana, the committee’s chair, called it the “law of all laws”, while a government minister termed it “Zionism’s flagship bill”.
    It effectively blocks any chance for Israel’s large Palestinian minority – one in five of the population – to reform Israel in the future into a normal, Western-style democracy.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/03/israeli-parliament-endorses-nation-state-bill-reading-180315192911365.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. @Israel Shamir

    “Rootless Cosmopolitan.”
     
    This is so fifties!

    sounds a little more sanitary

    leaves out the actual costs, in 1950′s “dollars”of the “Jewish” narrative”
    in the hundreds of millions lives, and trillions of “dollars”

    https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2018/03/24/omnibus-spending-bill-the-locusts-are-winning/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    There is a lot of criticism of Jewish behavior and most of it is justified.
    But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. Promoting trade resulted in accelerating progress of the society.
    Behavior of Jews was greatly influenced by what did happen in Medina.

    We do have to credit them with the invention of copper wire even if it was just because of two Jews fighting over a penny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @Seamus Padraig

    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.
     
    Well, the Jews in Israel and Ukraine seem to be co-operating quite nicely, as are the resident Jews over at The Guardian.

    I explicitly mentioned cooperation for the last world war.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Chet Roman
    At the March 2, 2018 conference, The Israel Lobby and American Policy 2018 March 2, 2018 at the National Press Club, Washington, D.C., Gideon Levy called the American “Israeli Lobby” by its correct description: the Jewish Lobby. He claimed that American Jews were the biggest enemy of Israel and that they were corrupting Israel.

    This is a critical insight that is usually mischaracterized as Israelis exerting too much influence and corrupting our political process. For the most part, it’s not Israelis who are responsible for the corruption of the American political system; it’s American Jews. Yes, there are a few Israelis or dual citizens; however, the vast majority of the Lobby and their hundreds of organizations are American Jews.

    Even John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt titled their breakthrough book the more publicly palatable “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis. If you can’t properly identify the source of the influence you can’t properly counter it.

    ” “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis ”
    The book identifies AIPAC as the lobby for Israel, not by Israelis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    But let's be honest, the Jewish Lobby is not just AIPAC and not just pro-Israel. It's still mealy-mouthed due to cowardice and trepidation of ... wait for it ... the JEWISH lobby. The Jewish lobby includes not only AIPAC but Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, PBC and every other Jew-controlled or Jew-owned mass media outlet; Jew think tanks; Jew "professors" and "experts"; and virtually every other Jew you see or hear in the media or in life. Because the ethnocentric, tribalistic refrain "Is it good for the Jews" defines the Jewish lobby and it is taken to heart by a very large proportion of Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    There is a lot of criticism of Jewish behavior and most of it is justified.
    But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. Promoting trade resulted in accelerating progress of the society.
    Behavior of Jews was greatly influenced by what did happen in Medina.

    ” But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. ”
    Pity that almost everywhere the non jewish population either did not see the good, or saw good just for jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. snag says:

    Mural in London – Two Jews, four Goyim (one oriental) – Guess who tagged it as ‘offensive’ and demanding to be removed?

    .https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OeDSmtRdd_k/maxresdefault.jpg

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Prince Charles was put in the hot seat late last year when a letter he penned to his mentor in 1986 resurfaced. In the letter he blamed the “foreign Jews” esp. those from Poland who returned to Israel for causing all the trouble in the Mideast, and said he wished the US will have a President who can stand up to the “Jewish lobby”, though he conceded it might just be wishful thinking:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5073607/Letter-penned-Prince-Charles-sparks-controversy.html

    Also I now begin to understand better their [Arabs’] point of view about Israel. Never realised they see it as a US colony.

    ‘I now appreciate that Arabs and Jews were all a Semitic people originally and it is the influx of foreign, European Jews (especially from Poland, they say) which has helped to cause great problems. I know there are so many complex issues, but how can there ever be an end to terrorism unless the causes are eliminated?

    ‘Surely some US president has to have the courage to stand up and take on the Jewish lobby in US? I must be naive, I suppose!’

    Needless to say he was crucified for that letter by the Jewish run msm in both the UK and the US.

    No doubt the US is run by Jews. Nearly half the US Senators from the Democrat party are dual citizens of Israel, including such prominent names as Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Adam Schiff, Bernie Sanders. Many other prominent US Jews are also dual citizens of Israel, Alan Derschowitz, Sidney Bloomenthal, Henry Kissinger. It’s way pass time for us to make a law that no dual citizen of any country can be elected to US congress, SCOTUS, POTUS or serve on the FBI, CIA, NSC, NSA, the Cabinet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @andrenovartis
    Dual citizenship ?
    Take a look at the Australian constitution.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. I have started calling all liberals and neocons “Jews”.

    80% of Jews are self-proclaimed liberals who embrace BLM, LGBTQ madness, open borders and US protection of Israel. The remaining 20% are “conservative” Jews like David Brooks who also embrace BLM, LGBTQ madness, open borders and full US protection of Israel, so there’s really no difference between them. Any non-Jew whose views are aligned with the Jews, be they self-proclaimed liberals or conservatives, if they embrace LGBTQ madness, BLM, open borders and/or protection of Israel should henceforth also be known as Jews, they might as well be.

    Therefore, Trump, Mike Pence, John Bolton, Nikki Haley, Nancy Pelosi, Anderson Cooper, Teresa May, Angela Merkel…all are JEWS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Another Realist
    Just to expand on my list:

    The Clintons, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Powers, Oprah, all Democrats, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, ...all are Jews.

    In fact, one is a Jew if one can check off two or more boxes below:

    - is dishonest
    - narcissistic
    - unpatriotic
    - money hungry
    - power hungry
    - hypocritical
    - adulterer
    - licentious
    - gluttonous
    - depraved
    - watches porn
    - swears a lot
    - does drugs
    - drinks an excessive amount of wine
    - lacks self-restraint
    - lacks self-critique, everything is always someone else's fault
    - supports open borders
    - supports BLM
    - supports LGBTQ
    - believes all of blacks' problems are caused by racism
    - believes in "institutional racism"
    - believes we need to "close the achievement gap"
    - supports legalization of drugs including marijuana
    - supports gay marriage
    - supports affirmative action
    - supports open borders
    - wants more immigration, either illegal or legal
    - wants US to militarily protect Israel
    - is a warmonger
    - believes multiculturalism is good for the western world
    - believes "our diversity is our strength"
    - morally wicked and corrupt
    - is a social justice warrior
    - is a member of Pink Pussyhat
    - wants equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunities
    - believes in the Russian collusion
    - believes Russia under Putin is our mortal enemy
    - believes the US should be "The World Police"
    - believes blacks, Jews, women are the perpetual victims of white males
    - wants to bring in more muslim refugees to the US
    - supports NATO and wants more arming of Ukraine
    - supports the UN
    - not black but loves Jazz or Rap
    - is a lawyer or a judge
    - works in media, academia, tech industry, Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, any government agency except the marines
    - is a member of the Democrat party
    - subscribes to the New Yorker
    - listens to NPR regularly
    - watches 60 minutes
    - consumes MSM in prodigious amount and unquestioningly
    - eschews manual labor
    - eschews yard work
    - is a man but does not know how to fix anything around the house
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. renfro says:
    @jilles dykstra
    As Shamir well knows, the jews' do not exist.
    Criticism of jews is of asjkenazi jews, and not even all of them.
    In the USA non asjkenazi jews have quite different political views.
    In the Netherlands we have 'Een Ander Joods Geluid', best translated with 'a different jewish opinion', an organistion that strongly criticises Israel.
    They're seen as traitors by the pro Israel group.
    How many jews worldwide cooperate with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA that want war, just on the basis of jewish propaganda, or identity, maybe identical, I often wonder.

    with a small group of jewish idiots in the USA

    It is not as small a group as you think.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. CalDre says:
    @jilles dykstra
    " “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis "
    The book identifies AIPAC as the lobby for Israel, not by Israelis.

    But let’s be honest, the Jewish Lobby is not just AIPAC and not just pro-Israel. It’s still mealy-mouthed due to cowardice and trepidation of … wait for it … the JEWISH lobby. The Jewish lobby includes not only AIPAC but Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, PBC and every other Jew-controlled or Jew-owned mass media outlet; Jew think tanks; Jew “professors” and “experts”; and virtually every other Jew you see or hear in the media or in life. Because the ethnocentric, tribalistic refrain “Is it good for the Jews” defines the Jewish lobby and it is taken to heart by a very large proportion of Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Chet Roman
    At the March 2, 2018 conference, The Israel Lobby and American Policy 2018 March 2, 2018 at the National Press Club, Washington, D.C., Gideon Levy called the American “Israeli Lobby” by its correct description: the Jewish Lobby. He claimed that American Jews were the biggest enemy of Israel and that they were corrupting Israel.

    This is a critical insight that is usually mischaracterized as Israelis exerting too much influence and corrupting our political process. For the most part, it’s not Israelis who are responsible for the corruption of the American political system; it’s American Jews. Yes, there are a few Israelis or dual citizens; however, the vast majority of the Lobby and their hundreds of organizations are American Jews.

    Even John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt titled their breakthrough book the more publicly palatable “The Israel Lobby”, as if 2% of our population was composed entirely of Israelis. If you can’t properly identify the source of the influence you can’t properly counter it.

    You are right. I have no problem with Jews in Israel. They are trying to build their own homeland and are not trying to sell out anyone’s country. The problem I have is with Jews in the US and Western Europe. They’re the ones trying to destroy western countries from within by promoting open borders, identity politics, victim mentality and warmongering neocon ideals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    God, what an ignorant idiot! Build THEIR own counter indeed!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    There is a lot of criticism of Jewish behavior and most of it is justified.
    But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. Promoting trade resulted in accelerating progress of the society.
    Behavior of Jews was greatly influenced by what did happen in Medina.

    Don’t try to white wash things. Jews are not promoting “trade”, they are promoting greed, supported by unlimited supply of 3rd world cheap labor through open borders. They are also promoting narcissism through identity politics and victim mentality, leading to chaos and discord all over the western world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Uncle Sam says:

    Are the Jewish people fools? Haven’t they learned anything from their history? Don’t they realize that their domineering ways will eventually lead to catastrophe? People who do not learn from experience are — to put it bluntly—stupid. There is no other way to put it. When it comes to such critical matters, the Jewish people have shown limited intelligence.

    Insofar as America is concerned, the Jewish people (certainly not all of them but a sizable number of them) have made a complete, total and utter mockery out of the American political system, such that that system has lost its effectiveness and relevancy to the American people; in fact, it has become a danger to these same people. It could result in a Third World War.

    American Gentiles cannot defend themselves from the Jewish influence under this so-called “democratic system”, which in practice is nothing more than a plutocracy. Indeed, just about every government in the western world is a plutocracy, if its political system can be manipulated by money, which certainly appears to be the case. Jewish money plays a large role in these situations.

    I am afraid that it will take a Caesar, Napoleon, or the proverbial man on the white horse to seize the reins of power in America to restore some degree of political legitimacy and sanity to America. One of the first things that should be done is to force AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbies to register with the Justice Department as agents of a foreign government. Right now, American law in that regard is being blatantly violated by these lobbies and the politicians in Washington, being the spineless cowards that they are, allow these organizations to conduct their activities without any check on them whatsoever.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Anon
    Both president Kennedy and his brother Robert planned to force AIPAC to register as an agent of a foreign country which is exactly what it is.

    They were killed for it.

    AIPAC and every other Jewish organization in the country is a de facto agent of Israel, a foreign country. I honestly don’t see why the Jews object to them registering as such.
    , @Fidelios Automata
    Isn't the Old Testament full of tales of Hebrew chutzpah and its karmic consequences?
    , @Druid
    Man, at this point I'll believe it when I see it, that they're stopped!
    , @jilles dykstra
    " Are the Jewish people fools? Haven’t they learned anything from their history? "

    Alas yes and no.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Uncle Sam
    Are the Jewish people fools? Haven't they learned anything from their history? Don't they realize that their domineering ways will eventually lead to catastrophe? People who do not learn from experience are --- to put it bluntly---stupid. There is no other way to put it. When it comes to such critical matters, the Jewish people have shown limited intelligence.

    Insofar as America is concerned, the Jewish people (certainly not all of them but a sizable number of them) have made a complete, total and utter mockery out of the American political system, such that that system has lost its effectiveness and relevancy to the American people; in fact, it has become a danger to these same people. It could result in a Third World War.

    American Gentiles cannot defend themselves from the Jewish influence under this so-called "democratic system", which in practice is nothing more than a plutocracy. Indeed, just about every government in the western world is a plutocracy, if its political system can be manipulated by money, which certainly appears to be the case. Jewish money plays a large role in these situations.

    I am afraid that it will take a Caesar, Napoleon, or the proverbial man on the white horse to seize the reins of power in America to restore some degree of political legitimacy and sanity to America. One of the first things that should be done is to force AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbies to register with the Justice Department as agents of a foreign government. Right now, American law in that regard is being blatantly violated by these lobbies and the politicians in Washington, being the spineless cowards that they are, allow these organizations to conduct their activities without any check on them whatsoever.

    Both president Kennedy and his brother Robert planned to force AIPAC to register as an agent of a foreign country which is exactly what it is.

    They were killed for it.

    AIPAC and every other Jewish organization in the country is a de facto agent of Israel, a foreign country. I honestly don’t see why the Jews object to them registering as such.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Another Realist
    I have started calling all liberals and neocons "Jews".

    80% of Jews are self-proclaimed liberals who embrace BLM, LGBTQ madness, open borders and US protection of Israel. The remaining 20% are "conservative" Jews like David Brooks who also embrace BLM, LGBTQ madness, open borders and full US protection of Israel, so there's really no difference between them. Any non-Jew whose views are aligned with the Jews, be they self-proclaimed liberals or conservatives, if they embrace LGBTQ madness, BLM, open borders and/or protection of Israel should henceforth also be known as Jews, they might as well be.

    Therefore, Trump, Mike Pence, John Bolton, Nikki Haley, Nancy Pelosi, Anderson Cooper, Teresa May, Angela Merkel...all are JEWS.

    Just to expand on my list:

    The Clintons, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Powers, Oprah, all Democrats, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, …all are Jews.

    In fact, one is a Jew if one can check off two or more boxes below:

    [MORE]

    - is dishonest
    - narcissistic
    - unpatriotic
    - money hungry
    - power hungry
    - hypocritical
    - adulterer
    - licentious
    - gluttonous
    - depraved
    - watches porn
    - swears a lot
    - does drugs
    - drinks an excessive amount of wine
    - lacks self-restraint
    - lacks self-critique, everything is always someone else’s fault
    - supports open borders
    - supports BLM
    - supports LGBTQ
    - believes all of blacks’ problems are caused by racism
    - believes in “institutional racism”
    - believes we need to “close the achievement gap”
    - supports legalization of drugs including marijuana
    - supports gay marriage
    - supports affirmative action
    - supports open borders
    - wants more immigration, either illegal or legal
    - wants US to militarily protect Israel
    - is a warmonger
    - believes multiculturalism is good for the western world
    - believes “our diversity is our strength”
    - morally wicked and corrupt
    - is a social justice warrior
    - is a member of Pink Pussyhat
    - wants equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunities
    - believes in the Russian collusion
    - believes Russia under Putin is our mortal enemy
    - believes the US should be “The World Police”
    - believes blacks, Jews, women are the perpetual victims of white males
    - wants to bring in more muslim refugees to the US
    - supports NATO and wants more arming of Ukraine
    - supports the UN
    - not black but loves Jazz or Rap
    - is a lawyer or a judge
    - works in media, academia, tech industry, Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, any government agency except the marines
    - is a member of the Democrat party
    - subscribes to the New Yorker
    - listens to NPR regularly
    - watches 60 minutes
    - consumes MSM in prodigious amount and unquestioningly
    - eschews manual labor
    - eschews yard work
    - is a man but does not know how to fix anything around the house

    Read More
    • Replies: @Another Realist
    Oh and above all:

    - does not support free speech

    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    You should ad (at first.) Disgusting table manners.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @Another Realist
    Just to expand on my list:

    The Clintons, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Powers, Oprah, all Democrats, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, ...all are Jews.

    In fact, one is a Jew if one can check off two or more boxes below:

    - is dishonest
    - narcissistic
    - unpatriotic
    - money hungry
    - power hungry
    - hypocritical
    - adulterer
    - licentious
    - gluttonous
    - depraved
    - watches porn
    - swears a lot
    - does drugs
    - drinks an excessive amount of wine
    - lacks self-restraint
    - lacks self-critique, everything is always someone else's fault
    - supports open borders
    - supports BLM
    - supports LGBTQ
    - believes all of blacks' problems are caused by racism
    - believes in "institutional racism"
    - believes we need to "close the achievement gap"
    - supports legalization of drugs including marijuana
    - supports gay marriage
    - supports affirmative action
    - supports open borders
    - wants more immigration, either illegal or legal
    - wants US to militarily protect Israel
    - is a warmonger
    - believes multiculturalism is good for the western world
    - believes "our diversity is our strength"
    - morally wicked and corrupt
    - is a social justice warrior
    - is a member of Pink Pussyhat
    - wants equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunities
    - believes in the Russian collusion
    - believes Russia under Putin is our mortal enemy
    - believes the US should be "The World Police"
    - believes blacks, Jews, women are the perpetual victims of white males
    - wants to bring in more muslim refugees to the US
    - supports NATO and wants more arming of Ukraine
    - supports the UN
    - not black but loves Jazz or Rap
    - is a lawyer or a judge
    - works in media, academia, tech industry, Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, any government agency except the marines
    - is a member of the Democrat party
    - subscribes to the New Yorker
    - listens to NPR regularly
    - watches 60 minutes
    - consumes MSM in prodigious amount and unquestioningly
    - eschews manual labor
    - eschews yard work
    - is a man but does not know how to fix anything around the house

    Oh and above all:

    - does not support free speech

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. renfro says:

    Pelosi Leads Democratic Congressional Delegation To Israel And Jordan
    March 25, 2018 By JTA

    (JTA) — Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the U.S. House of Representatives minority leader, is leading a congressional delegation visit to Israel and Jordan.
    The visit, which began on Sunday and ends on Thursday, will focus on “global and regional security and cooperation issues,” according to a statement issued by Pelosi’s office.
    “There is no greater political accomplishment in the 20th century than the establishment of the State of Israel,” said Pelosi, who represents a district in California, in the statement announcing the visit. “Our delegation is pleased to be able to extend the congratulations of the American people to the people of Israel as we celebrate the 70th anniversary of Jewish state this spring.”
    Pelosi said the delegation’s visit to Jordan comes at “a vital time in the U.S. relationship with this key ally.” She also said that members of the delegation “are particularly interested in reviewing the Syrian refugee and humanitarian challenges as well as addressing other critical challenges facing the region.”
    All ten members of the congressional delegation are Democrats. Three of them, Adam Schiff of California, Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, and Jamie Raskin of Maryland, are Jewish.

    Read more: undefined/fast-forward/397414/minority-leader-nancy-pelosi-leads-congressional-delegation-to-israel-and/

    Read More
    • Replies: @RudyM

    “As far as the Jewish community is concerned, she feels our issues in her soul,” he said.

    To illustrate his point, Lauter told a Pelosi story that has become almost legendary in the Jewish community. At an AIPAC members luncheon in San Francisco right after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Pelosi was speaking when an alarm sounded. “Everybody started getting nervous, scrambling toward the door,” Lauter recalled. One person, though, was reading the words of Hatikvah, the Israeli national anthem, above the din. It was Pelosi.

    “It actually calmed the crowd,” Lauter said. “You could see people actually smiling, saying ‘Wow.’ ” This “wasn’t something done purposefully to show everyone that Nancy Pelosi supports the Jewish community,” he said. It “actually came from inside her.”
     
    http://progressiveisrael.org/2006/11/

    (Looks like I misremembered this. I thought it happened in a meeting that occurred on the day of 9/11.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. renfro says:

    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/243576

    Ex-UN ambassador: Bolton updated Israel to avert hostile UN moves
    Bolton called and said: ‘Danny, you’ve got to call the Prime Minister right now, for him to phone the President so he’ll stop this.’

    [MORE]

    ”Danny Gillerman was Israeli ambassador to the United Nations during the period John Bolton served as America’s UN ambassador. He told Yishai Shnerb on Galei Tzahal (Army Radio) this morning that whenever the UN or certain elements in the US administration formulated a resolution against Israel, John Bolton would update him so that the Prime Minister would phone the President directly to quash the threat.
    Shnerb began the interview recalling a statement of Bolton’s that “you could remove ten stories” from the UN building, “and nothing bad would happen.”

    “Yes,” agreed Gillerman, “That’s what he said even before he arrived at the building. I think after he got there he was willing to get rid of twenty floors, out of the 38. I remember in one of the first meetings he had with all the sitting ambassadors on the Security Council, he said a sentence that at first I thought I didn’t understand, but in time, I understood it in depth. We were debating some resolution – again some motion against Israel – and they tried to improve it and add a sentence here and take out a word there… And he looked at them and said ‘Gentlemen, I want to impart to you one thing: The United States won’t agree to a single thing that the United States doesn’t agree to.’
    “In the beginning it sounded to me like a strange sentence, but afterwards when I got to know him, I realized that the man means what he says. You can’t approach him and say ‘Listen, let it pass; it’ll be okay, nothing will happen,’ no; he has principles that are quite clear. First of all, he is truly a very, very close friend of Israel.”
    Shnerb asked for an example, to which Gillerman answered: “Look; many times he would call me or ask me to come meet with him, and for all intents and purposes, would direct fire on his own forces. Meaning, when the State Department – then headed by Condoleezza Rice, who wasn’t so friendly to Israel even though the Bush Administration was very friendly – was about to either make a decision, or not abstain, or not veto, or to advance something that was against us, Bolton would call me, and he would say ‘Danny, you’ve got to call the Prime Minister right now, in order for him to phone the President to stop this’.”
    The interviewer wished to make sure he heard Gillerman correctly: “Wait a second; the State Department under Condoleezza Rice advanced something against Israel, and the US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton calls you and says, ‘Listen, wake Olmert so he’ll talk to Bush to stop her’?”
    “Exactly,” answers Gillerman. “Exactly; and there were many such instances. The most striking example, which by the way was made public – Olmert also writes about it in his book – during the Second Lebanon War, John Bolton and I worked together to move forward Resolution 17, the resolution that ultimately brought about the cease-fire in that war. The US supported us and I worked very closely with Bolton. The French supported Lebanon.”
    “That night, before the American envoy was to arrive the next morning to present the Prime Minister with the draft resolution to be accepted by the Security Council, John Bolton phones me at something like three in the morning Israel time – I was in New York, so it was about 8:00 in the evening in New York – and he says ‘I must see you’. He comes to my house so that it wouldn’t be in my office or his, and he says ‘Listen, Condoleezza Rice has sold you to the French. Meaning, she agreed to the French proposal that was approved by the Lebanese, and the draft that the Prime Minister is going to see tomorrow morning isn’t the draft we’re going to vote on, and it’s very bad for you.’
    “I did awaken the Prime Minister, and because of this he convened a meeting. Yes, he did receive the incorrect draft – it turned out that the correct version was ready and Condoleezza Rice was already on the way to New York to promote it. In great measure because of this – and I think then Prime Minister Olmert also says this – the Prime Minister asked for an extension of an additional 48 hours to solidify Israel’s position, to prevent passing a very deleterious resolution to Israel from being ratified. It was very, very negative for us – ultimately it led to a resolution that brought an end of the war and quiet in the north.”
    “Do you still keep contact? Have you spoken since he was appointed Trump’s National Security Advisor?”, the interviewer asks.
    “Yes, we also exchanged emails on Friday, I congratulated him and immediately received back a letter in which he invites us to visit him in the White House, send regards to my wife, who had a very close relationship with his wife Gretchen. Yesterday we also spoke on the telephone; he very much wanted this position. I don’t know if you remember but he was a very prominent candidate for Deputy Secretary of State, when Trump was looking for a Deputy Secretary for Tillerson. But for some reason then it didn’t happen.
    “Bolton very much wanted to be in the White House, and to implement the principles he believes in. He’s waiting to enter the post on April 9th but he’s already preparing for it. I think the United States got an extremely experienced diplomat who served both Reagan and Bush, he’s an expert in everything having to do with nuclear weapon proliferation. He was the Deputy Secretary of State then, and Israel is receiving a true friend.
    “I can state this from the work he did together with me in the UN. I don’t know if people are aware of this but Bolton was appointed by Bush without Senate approval, which a President can do when the Senate is in recess. Then for many months I tried to assist him together with Chuck Schumer and others to get the Senate’s approval. It didn’t happen, and he was eventually forced to abandon his post at the UN. But since then he’s very much wanted to return to a position of influence and I think the fact that he attained it is a great gift to Israel. I think it adds great power to the American administration in face of the challenges.
    “By the way, he frequently comes to Israel; he participated in the latest Herzliya Conference, he met with the Prime Minister – so the relationship is very close and I think we can look forward to very fruitful cooperation with a true friend in the White House.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. renfro says:

    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    Congress more than doubles security grants to $60 million – St. Louis …
    http://www.stljewishlight.com/news/…/article_c5808834-a4a7-5deb-9131-f00a9ccebe3a.ht…;
    16 hours ago – WASHINGTON (JTA) — An omnibus spending bill approved by Congress more than doubles spending for security grants that have been overwhelmingly tapped by Jewish institutions. The $1.3 trillion bill approved Thursday includes $60 million for the security grants, up from $25 million last year.

    Jewish Groups Get 94% of Homeland Security Grants – The Forward
    https://forward.com › News › Breaking News
    Jul 29, 2014 – The Department of Homeland Security allocated to Jewish institutions $12 million, or 94 percent, of $13 million in funds for securing nonprofits. The Jewish Federations of North America’s Washington office director, William Daroff, said Tuesday that the allocation made sense particularly in light of an …

    U.S. Jewish NGOs to get 97% of Homeland Security’s defense grant in …
    https://www.haaretz.com › Jewish World
    Jul 2, 2012 – While the budget has shrunk in recent years, the threat to Jewish institutions has not changed; as a result, Jewish non-profits will receive a record percentage of the funds.

    Read More
    • Replies: @snag
    Another load ,...

    Haredi Schools Appear To Rip Off Federal E-Rate Program With The Help Of Haredi-Owned Telecom Companies
    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2013/02/haredi-schools-appear-to-rip-off-federal-e-rate-program-with-the-help-of-haredi-owned-telecom-compan-345.html


    93% Of Kiryas Joel On Medicaid Or Subsidized Health Insurance
    Kiryas Joel Welcome SignNew data released by Orange County, New York shows that almost 93% of the Satmar hasidic Village of Kiryas Joel is on Medicaid or state supported health insurance.


    Welfare Reform? Not For The Orthodox
    In the wake of the new population study of New York Jewry, Raphael Magarik tackles Commentary's double standard on welfare: Welfare babies are a menace, unless they're Haredi.
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/welfare-reform-not-for-the-orthodox


    Almost 80% Of NYC's Daycare Vouchers Reportedly Given To Haredim, Leaving Others Without Help
    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2014/06/almost-80-of-nycs-daycare-vouchers-reportedly-given-to-haredim-leaving-others-without-help-123.html


    How Do Haredi Schools Get All That Money?Service providers haul in millions in tech funds for schools and libraries, but some don’t even have websites.
    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/how-do-haredi-schools-get-all-that-money/


    A Village With the Numbers, Not the Image, of the Poorest Place
    https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/nyregion/kiryas-joel-a-village-with-the-numbers-not-the-image-of-the-poorest-place.html


    Here're some secular rip-off artists

    https://forward.com/news/israel/194978/26-billion-bucks-the-jewish-charity-industry-unco/?p=all&p=all
    https://forward.com/news/israel/195377/jewish-charities-grow-huge-on-cash-from-government/?p=all&p=all

    ... and on, and on, and on - This is just a drop in the bucket I can go a whole nigh with it ,...

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. joe webb says:

    it will never end. Jews R Us. per christian religion. Reading a new book on Charlemagne. He called himself a David.

    Both Christian main sects plus all the hundreds of little ones, love the Jews. If you criticize the Jews you are the devil.

    Then we got Trump eating jew shit. Impeach Trump. Bolton is a zombie..Nothing can kill him. That is cuz of our religion. It is not jew money, brains, etc. Jews are our mascot, our direct link to G-d.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  52. renfro says:

    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    Eric Alterman……

    “I am a dual loyal Jew and sometimes I’m going to actually go with Israel, because the United States can take an awful lot of hits and come up standing. Whereas if Israel takes one serious bad hit it could disappear. So there’s going to be some cases where I go with Israel.
    I think that bin Laden and 9/11 were to some degree inspired by U.S. support of Israel. I think a great deal of the terrorist attacks and the sort of pool of potential terrorists who want to attack the United States are inspired by the United States support for Israel. I’m not saying we shouldn’t support Israel for that reason. I’m saying, Dammit if that’s the price we have to pay, then I’m willing to pay it.”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    911 - inside job with Israel in the drivers seat. Thus the great support for Israel
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. renfro says:

    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    US Senator Ernest Hollings was moved in May 2004 to acknowledge that the US invaded Iraq “to secure Israel,” and “everybody” knows it. He also identified three of the influential pro-Israel Jews in Washington who played an important role in prodding the US into war: Richard Perle, chair of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board; Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Defense Secretary; and Charles Krauthammer, columnist and author.

    Hollings referred to the cowardly reluctance of his Congressional colleagues to acknowledge this truth openly, saying that “nobody is willing to stand up and say what is going on.” Due to “the pressures we get politically,” he added, members of Congress uncritically support Israel and its policies.
    Remarks by Ernest F. Hollings, May 20, 2004. Congressional Record – Senate, May 20, 2004, pages S5921-S5925. Also “”Iraq Was Invaded to Secure Israel

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. renfro says:

    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    Case over prayer at Rowan commissioners meetings heads to federal …
    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article56790123.html

    [MORE]

    Jan 27, 2016 – Case over prayer at Rowan commissioners meetings heads to federal appeals court … town’s use of predominantly Christian invocations at its meetings.
    The case marks the first time a federal appeals court has considered how local councils conduct prayers since a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court ruling upheld a New York town’s use of predominantly Christian invocations at its meetings.
    A three-judge panel of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled on Wednesday to hear Rowan County’s effort to overturn a federal judge’s ruling that local officials ran afoul of constitutional requirements separating church and state.
    The plaintiffs, who are two Jews and one aethist said the prayers made them feel excluded and sent the message that the board favored a particular religion. They said they felt pressured to stand and participate because the commission and most of the audience would do so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. I prefer the euphemisms “globalist,” “neoconservative,” and “bankster,” because even though these groups are dominated by Jews, they don’t encompass the 90% of Jews who aren’t involved in these conspiracies. “Zionist,” however, doesn’t have that same negative connotation for me, because most Jews feel some loyalty to Israel, just as I feel some affection for Germany and Sweden because those are my tribes. Though I do use Saker’s term “Anglo-Zionist Empire” because that underscores the collusion of US+UK+Netanyahu’s Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. @Uncle Sam
    Are the Jewish people fools? Haven't they learned anything from their history? Don't they realize that their domineering ways will eventually lead to catastrophe? People who do not learn from experience are --- to put it bluntly---stupid. There is no other way to put it. When it comes to such critical matters, the Jewish people have shown limited intelligence.

    Insofar as America is concerned, the Jewish people (certainly not all of them but a sizable number of them) have made a complete, total and utter mockery out of the American political system, such that that system has lost its effectiveness and relevancy to the American people; in fact, it has become a danger to these same people. It could result in a Third World War.

    American Gentiles cannot defend themselves from the Jewish influence under this so-called "democratic system", which in practice is nothing more than a plutocracy. Indeed, just about every government in the western world is a plutocracy, if its political system can be manipulated by money, which certainly appears to be the case. Jewish money plays a large role in these situations.

    I am afraid that it will take a Caesar, Napoleon, or the proverbial man on the white horse to seize the reins of power in America to restore some degree of political legitimacy and sanity to America. One of the first things that should be done is to force AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbies to register with the Justice Department as agents of a foreign government. Right now, American law in that regard is being blatantly violated by these lobbies and the politicians in Washington, being the spineless cowards that they are, allow these organizations to conduct their activities without any check on them whatsoever.

    Isn’t the Old Testament full of tales of Hebrew chutzpah and its karmic consequences?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Realist says:

    American friends of Israel, Sheldon Adelson and Jeff Katzenberg are the largest donors; and in general Jews spent more money on presidential elections in the US than on helping needy Jews.

    Talk about brash chutzpah. Check out the this web site directed at dumb ass Christians to swindle them out of their hard earned money. There are many Jewish billionaires who could easily foot the bill of support for ‘destitute’ Israelis
    Adelson and Wynn…. their ill gotten gambling profits from middle and lower income Americans (damn few Jews gamble). Or Katzenberg, Zukerberg and Zuker….or any of the Goldman Sachs’s billionaires (from there corrupt ‘financial products’).

    http://www.ifcj.org/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwkd3VBRDzARIsAAdGzMBT48n0jgMp0eDxmZr4_w5z3W32nygVqKdRVUx2jU4j1By5dtEVFjsaAgzaEALw_wcB

    The video featured on this site (watch it) has run on Fox (targeting Evangelicals) several times.
    It is disgusting..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I see it often in various channels. There’s also one about feeding the starving holocaust survivors in Russia. The Russian survivors dress in rags and blankets. They live in huts with no heat and sleep on the floor on piles of rags.

    They are hysterically funny. The aged crones are covered in inch deep wrinkles and dirt and haven’t combed their hair in years. The Passover packages are necessary because neither the Israeli nor Russian Jews can afford a decent Passover dinner.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. snag says:
    @renfro
    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA

    Congress more than doubles security grants to $60 million - St. Louis ...
    www.stljewishlight.com/news/.../article_c5808834-a4a7-5deb-9131-f00a9ccebe3a.ht...
    16 hours ago - WASHINGTON (JTA) — An omnibus spending bill approved by Congress more than doubles spending for security grants that have been overwhelmingly tapped by Jewish institutions. The $1.3 trillion bill approved Thursday includes $60 million for the security grants, up from $25 million last year.


    Jewish Groups Get 94% of Homeland Security Grants – The Forward
    https://forward.com › News › Breaking News
    Jul 29, 2014 - The Department of Homeland Security allocated to Jewish institutions $12 million, or 94 percent, of $13 million in funds for securing nonprofits. The Jewish Federations of North America's Washington office director, William Daroff, said Tuesday that the allocation made sense particularly in light of an ...


    U.S. Jewish NGOs to get 97% of Homeland Security's defense grant in ...
    https://www.haaretz.com › Jewish World
    Jul 2, 2012 - While the budget has shrunk in recent years, the threat to Jewish institutions has not changed; as a result, Jewish non-profits will receive a record percentage of the funds.

    Another load ,…

    Haredi Schools Appear To Rip Off Federal E-Rate Program With The Help Of Haredi-Owned Telecom Companies

    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2013/02/haredi-schools-appear-to-rip-off-federal-e-rate-program-with-the-help-of-haredi-owned-telecom-compan-345.html

    93% Of Kiryas Joel On Medicaid Or Subsidized Health Insurance
    Kiryas Joel Welcome SignNew data released by Orange County, New York shows that almost 93% of the Satmar hasidic Village of Kiryas Joel is on Medicaid or state supported health insurance.

    Welfare Reform? Not For The Orthodox
    In the wake of the new population study of New York Jewry, Raphael Magarik tackles Commentary’s double standard on welfare: Welfare babies are a menace, unless they’re Haredi.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/welfare-reform-not-for-the-orthodox

    Almost 80% Of NYC’s Daycare Vouchers Reportedly Given To Haredim, Leaving Others Without Help

    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2014/06/almost-80-of-nycs-daycare-vouchers-reportedly-given-to-haredim-leaving-others-without-help-123.html

    How Do Haredi Schools Get All That Money?Service providers haul in millions in tech funds for schools and libraries, but some don’t even have websites.

    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/how-do-haredi-schools-get-all-that-money/

    A Village With the Numbers, Not the Image, of the Poorest Place

    https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/nyregion/kiryas-joel-a-village-with-the-numbers-not-the-image-of-the-poorest-place.html

    Here’re some secular rip-off artists

    https://forward.com/news/israel/194978/26-billion-bucks-the-jewish-charity-industry-unco/?p=all&p=all

    https://forward.com/news/israel/195377/jewish-charities-grow-huge-on-cash-from-government/?p=all&p=all

    … and on, and on, and on – This is just a drop in the bucket I can go a whole nigh with it ,…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. renfro says:

    On Giving our taxpayers money to the Jews

    WJC – US applauds congress for passing bill including critical provisions to aid Israel and Taylor Force Act

    Fri, 23 Mar 2018

    NEW YORK World Jewish Congress United States (WJC US) on Friday applauded the US Congress for the passage of the Omnibus Spending bill that includes critical provisions to aid Israel in 2018.

    The spending bill ensures $3.1 billion in security assistance to Israel, as well as $705.8 million for missile defense programs such as Arrow, David’s Sling and Iron Dome. These missile systems are jointly developed by the US and Israel and is critical to both nations’ security needs.

    As well, funding for anti-tunneling technologies is also included in this bill. $47.5 million has been allocated for the joint development of systems that can help detect terrorist threats underground, a constant concern in Israel and to American forces abroad.

    Finally, we are gratified that the bill also includes the Taylor Force Act, legislation that cuts funding to the Palestinian Authority (PA) that supports their practice of paying terrorists or their families, increasing pressure to stop terrorism.

    WJC US extends its thanks to the Congressional leadership who helped pass this momentous legislation: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY), Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Thad Cochran (R-MS) and Ranking Member Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-TN) and Ranking Member Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ) and Ranking Member Nita Lowey (D-NY), House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) and Ranking Member Eliot Engel (D-NY), Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY), Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX), Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-IN) and Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Uncle Sam says:

    I disagree. Kennedy was killed because he was trying to have Castro killed. So Castro killed Kennedy in self defense. There is a documentary that deals with that situation. I don’t believe it has ever been shown here in the U.S., but it is online. It is titled “A Rendezvous with Death: Why John F. Kennedy Had to Die.”

    It explains everything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Look, everybody knows that you killed JFK. Enough with the conspiracy theories already.
    , @jilles dykstra
    Another great explanation is
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    , @APB
    I don’t believe Castro killed Kennedy at all, why would he? JFK was in secret back channel communications with Castro at the time of his death. JFK was killed most likely by the CIA who saw him as an existential threat, especially after his remark “I want to break them into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the wind”. They saw him as a threat and moved first.
    Certainly David ben Gurion and JFK intensely disliked each other to say the least, JFK refused to condone Israel developing a nuke so it most suited Israel to have JFK die. Very possibly JFK was a joint CIA and Mossad operation.
    Read JFK and the Unspeakable by James W Douglass for an excellent analysis of what happened.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. RudyM says:
    @renfro
    Pelosi Leads Democratic Congressional Delegation To Israel And Jordan
    March 25, 2018 By JTA

    (JTA) — Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the U.S. House of Representatives minority leader, is leading a congressional delegation visit to Israel and Jordan.
    The visit, which began on Sunday and ends on Thursday, will focus on “global and regional security and cooperation issues,” according to a statement issued by Pelosi’s office.
    “There is no greater political accomplishment in the 20th century than the establishment of the State of Israel,” said Pelosi, who represents a district in California, in the statement announcing the visit. “Our delegation is pleased to be able to extend the congratulations of the American people to the people of Israel as we celebrate the 70th anniversary of Jewish state this spring.”
    Pelosi said the delegation’s visit to Jordan comes at “a vital time in the U.S. relationship with this key ally.” She also said that members of the delegation “are particularly interested in reviewing the Syrian refugee and humanitarian challenges as well as addressing other critical challenges facing the region.”
    All ten members of the congressional delegation are Democrats. Three of them, Adam Schiff of California, Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, and Jamie Raskin of Maryland, are Jewish.

    Read more: undefined/fast-forward/397414/minority-leader-nancy-pelosi-leads-congressional-delegation-to-israel-and/

    “As far as the Jewish community is concerned, she feels our issues in her soul,” he said.

    To illustrate his point, Lauter told a Pelosi story that has become almost legendary in the Jewish community. At an AIPAC members luncheon in San Francisco right after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Pelosi was speaking when an alarm sounded. “Everybody started getting nervous, scrambling toward the door,” Lauter recalled. One person, though, was reading the words of Hatikvah, the Israeli national anthem, above the din. It was Pelosi.

    “It actually calmed the crowd,” Lauter said. “You could see people actually smiling, saying ‘Wow.’ ” This “wasn’t something done purposefully to show everyone that Nancy Pelosi supports the Jewish community,” he said. It “actually came from inside her.”

    http://progressiveisrael.org/2006/11/

    (Looks like I misremembered this. I thought it happened in a meeting that occurred on the day of 9/11.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    " It “actually came from inside her.”"

    Yeah, like a gaseous emission. There was no holding it back, either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Many of Stalin’s bloodiest henchmen were Jews.

    And in Israel, people feel free to say so:

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. @Another Realist
    Just to expand on my list:

    The Clintons, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Powers, Oprah, all Democrats, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, ...all are Jews.

    In fact, one is a Jew if one can check off two or more boxes below:

    - is dishonest
    - narcissistic
    - unpatriotic
    - money hungry
    - power hungry
    - hypocritical
    - adulterer
    - licentious
    - gluttonous
    - depraved
    - watches porn
    - swears a lot
    - does drugs
    - drinks an excessive amount of wine
    - lacks self-restraint
    - lacks self-critique, everything is always someone else's fault
    - supports open borders
    - supports BLM
    - supports LGBTQ
    - believes all of blacks' problems are caused by racism
    - believes in "institutional racism"
    - believes we need to "close the achievement gap"
    - supports legalization of drugs including marijuana
    - supports gay marriage
    - supports affirmative action
    - supports open borders
    - wants more immigration, either illegal or legal
    - wants US to militarily protect Israel
    - is a warmonger
    - believes multiculturalism is good for the western world
    - believes "our diversity is our strength"
    - morally wicked and corrupt
    - is a social justice warrior
    - is a member of Pink Pussyhat
    - wants equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunities
    - believes in the Russian collusion
    - believes Russia under Putin is our mortal enemy
    - believes the US should be "The World Police"
    - believes blacks, Jews, women are the perpetual victims of white males
    - wants to bring in more muslim refugees to the US
    - supports NATO and wants more arming of Ukraine
    - supports the UN
    - not black but loves Jazz or Rap
    - is a lawyer or a judge
    - works in media, academia, tech industry, Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, any government agency except the marines
    - is a member of the Democrat party
    - subscribes to the New Yorker
    - listens to NPR regularly
    - watches 60 minutes
    - consumes MSM in prodigious amount and unquestioningly
    - eschews manual labor
    - eschews yard work
    - is a man but does not know how to fix anything around the house

    You should ad (at first.) Disgusting table manners.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. I’ll go a step further than saying Jew, and state that I don’t like Jewish power, Jewish culture, Jewish humor, Jewish looks, or many Jews that I meet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. bjondo says:

    Some sites get queasy with use of “Jew” so I vary with yid, parasite, vampire (usually with blood sucking), thief, liar, genocidalist, squat, skunk. Jew very flexible. Deceives with many forms therefore many names. Almost forgot – neocon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. Druid says:
    @Another Realist
    You are right. I have no problem with Jews in Israel. They are trying to build their own homeland and are not trying to sell out anyone's country. The problem I have is with Jews in the US and Western Europe. They're the ones trying to destroy western countries from within by promoting open borders, identity politics, victim mentality and warmongering neocon ideals.

    God, what an ignorant idiot! Build THEIR own counter indeed!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Yorem says:

    My grandfather, a Hasidic Mohel, called the Jews from Eastern Europe the Cockroaches….the ones that cause all the trouble.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Cockroaches…."
    Kristolls, Pletka, Kagans, Rubin, Perle, Ledeen, Feifth, Podhorets, Muravchik, Frum and more -- a crowd of quarrelsome, dishonest, poorly-mannered, shameless and obnoxious bloviators, many festering profitably in various stink-tanks with the next-war agenda.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Druid says:
    @Uncle Sam
    Are the Jewish people fools? Haven't they learned anything from their history? Don't they realize that their domineering ways will eventually lead to catastrophe? People who do not learn from experience are --- to put it bluntly---stupid. There is no other way to put it. When it comes to such critical matters, the Jewish people have shown limited intelligence.

    Insofar as America is concerned, the Jewish people (certainly not all of them but a sizable number of them) have made a complete, total and utter mockery out of the American political system, such that that system has lost its effectiveness and relevancy to the American people; in fact, it has become a danger to these same people. It could result in a Third World War.

    American Gentiles cannot defend themselves from the Jewish influence under this so-called "democratic system", which in practice is nothing more than a plutocracy. Indeed, just about every government in the western world is a plutocracy, if its political system can be manipulated by money, which certainly appears to be the case. Jewish money plays a large role in these situations.

    I am afraid that it will take a Caesar, Napoleon, or the proverbial man on the white horse to seize the reins of power in America to restore some degree of political legitimacy and sanity to America. One of the first things that should be done is to force AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbies to register with the Justice Department as agents of a foreign government. Right now, American law in that regard is being blatantly violated by these lobbies and the politicians in Washington, being the spineless cowards that they are, allow these organizations to conduct their activities without any check on them whatsoever.

    Man, at this point I’ll believe it when I see it, that they’re stopped!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Druid says:
    @renfro
    JEWS are BAD for AMERICA


    Eric Alterman......

    "I am a dual loyal Jew and sometimes I'm going to actually go with Israel, because the United States can take an awful lot of hits and come up standing. Whereas if Israel takes one serious bad hit it could disappear. So there’s going to be some cases where I go with Israel.
    I think that bin Laden and 9/11 were to some degree inspired by U.S. support of Israel. I think a great deal of the terrorist attacks and the sort of pool of potential terrorists who want to attack the United States are inspired by the United States support for Israel. I’m not saying we shouldn’t support Israel for that reason. I’m saying, Dammit if that’s the price we have to pay, then I'm willing to pay it.''
    http://mondoweiss.net/2011

    911 – inside job with Israel in the drivers seat. Thus the great support for Israel

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Uncle Sam
    I disagree. Kennedy was killed because he was trying to have Castro killed. So Castro killed Kennedy in self defense. There is a documentary that deals with that situation. I don't believe it has ever been shown here in the U.S., but it is online. It is titled "A Rendezvous with Death: Why John F. Kennedy Had to Die."

    It explains everything.

    Look, everybody knows that you killed JFK. Enough with the conspiracy theories already.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @RudyM

    “As far as the Jewish community is concerned, she feels our issues in her soul,” he said.

    To illustrate his point, Lauter told a Pelosi story that has become almost legendary in the Jewish community. At an AIPAC members luncheon in San Francisco right after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Pelosi was speaking when an alarm sounded. “Everybody started getting nervous, scrambling toward the door,” Lauter recalled. One person, though, was reading the words of Hatikvah, the Israeli national anthem, above the din. It was Pelosi.

    “It actually calmed the crowd,” Lauter said. “You could see people actually smiling, saying ‘Wow.’ ” This “wasn’t something done purposefully to show everyone that Nancy Pelosi supports the Jewish community,” he said. It “actually came from inside her.”
     
    http://progressiveisrael.org/2006/11/

    (Looks like I misremembered this. I thought it happened in a meeting that occurred on the day of 9/11.)

    ” It “actually came from inside her.””

    Yeah, like a gaseous emission. There was no holding it back, either.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. MEFOBILLS says:
    @anon
    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has "Nazi" in it?

    I used to think Nazi was a slur word, but it looks like its a contraction:

    In German Nazi is the abreviation of “Nazional Zozialist

    Same goes for Gestapo:

    “Ge sta po” is an abreviation of GEheime STAats POlizei

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    Nazi is a byword for "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

    But:
    "The term "Nazi" was in use before the rise of the NSDAP as a colloquial and derogatory word for a backwards farmer or peasant, characterizing an awkward and clumsy person. This was derived from Nazi a hypocorism of the German men's name Ignatz (itself a variation of the men's name Ignatius) – Ignatz being a common name at the time in Bavaria, the area from which the NSDAP emerged.
    In the 1920s, political opponents of the NSDAP in the German labour movement seized on this and – using the earlier abbreviated term "Sozi" for Sozialist (English: Socialist) as an example – shortened the first part of the party's name, [Na]tionalso[zi]alistische, to the dismissive "Nazi", in order to associate them with the derogatory use of the term mentioned above" (Wikipedia).

    There is no such 'thing' as Nazism. It was National Socialism, as it was a National Bolshevism. An offspring of the Socialist movement, without the 'international' characteristics (which characterized Marxism). "Labor Zionism" is a National Socialist movement.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Another Realist
    Prince Charles was put in the hot seat late last year when a letter he penned to his mentor in 1986 resurfaced. In the letter he blamed the "foreign Jews" esp. those from Poland who returned to Israel for causing all the trouble in the Mideast, and said he wished the US will have a President who can stand up to the "Jewish lobby", though he conceded it might just be wishful thinking:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5073607/Letter-penned-Prince-Charles-sparks-controversy.html

    Also I now begin to understand better their [Arabs’] point of view about Israel. Never realised they see it as a US colony.

    'I now appreciate that Arabs and Jews were all a Semitic people originally and it is the influx of foreign, European Jews (especially from Poland, they say) which has helped to cause great problems. I know there are so many complex issues, but how can there ever be an end to terrorism unless the causes are eliminated?

    ‘Surely some US president has to have the courage to stand up and take on the Jewish lobby in US? I must be naive, I suppose!’
     

    Needless to say he was crucified for that letter by the Jewish run msm in both the UK and the US.

    No doubt the US is run by Jews. Nearly half the US Senators from the Democrat party are dual citizens of Israel, including such prominent names as Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Adam Schiff, Bernie Sanders. Many other prominent US Jews are also dual citizens of Israel, Alan Derschowitz, Sidney Bloomenthal, Henry Kissinger. It's way pass time for us to make a law that no dual citizen of any country can be elected to US congress, SCOTUS, POTUS or serve on the FBI, CIA, NSC, NSA, the Cabinet.

    Dual citizenship ?
    Take a look at the Australian constitution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Seraphim says:
    @MEFOBILLS
    I used to think Nazi was a slur word, but it looks like its a contraction:

    In German Nazi is the abreviation of "Nazional Zozialist

    Same goes for Gestapo:

    "Ge sta po" is an abreviation of GEheime STAats POlizei

    Nazi is a byword for “Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

    But:
    “The term “Nazi” was in use before the rise of the NSDAP as a colloquial and derogatory word for a backwards farmer or peasant, characterizing an awkward and clumsy person. This was derived from Nazi a hypocorism of the German men’s name Ignatz (itself a variation of the men’s name Ignatius) – Ignatz being a common name at the time in Bavaria, the area from which the NSDAP emerged.
    In the 1920s, political opponents of the NSDAP in the German labour movement seized on this and – using the earlier abbreviated term “Sozi” for Sozialist (English: Socialist) as an example – shortened the first part of the party’s name, [Na]tionalso[zi]alistische, to the dismissive “Nazi”, in order to associate them with the derogatory use of the term mentioned above” (Wikipedia).

    There is no such ‘thing’ as Nazism. It was National Socialism, as it was a National Bolshevism. An offspring of the Socialist movement, without the ‘international’ characteristics (which characterized Marxism). “Labor Zionism” is a National Socialist movement.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Macon Richardson
    Thank you, Seraphim, for correcting MEFOBILLS foolish error and thanks for the complete etymology of the word NAZI.
    , @Twodees Partain
    That's a distinction without a difference, really. I wouldn't put too much faith in wikipedia for etymology of a term, especially if it leads to the conclusion that "There is no such ‘thing’ as Nazism."

    "Nazism" appears to be just an easy reference word for National Socialism, and isn't so easily dismissed as a useful descriptor. There's no need to labor over minutiae in terms used to discuss a defunct political system. Those who don't realize that National Socialism was still a form of socialism aren't likely to be educated, while those who do understand don't need to be led aside to debate how many socialists can dance upon the head of a pin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Realist

    American friends of Israel, Sheldon Adelson and Jeff Katzenberg are the largest donors; and in general Jews spent more money on presidential elections in the US than on helping needy Jews.
     
    Talk about brash chutzpah. Check out the this web site directed at dumb ass Christians to swindle them out of their hard earned money. There are many Jewish billionaires who could easily foot the bill of support for 'destitute' Israelis
    Adelson and Wynn.... their ill gotten gambling profits from middle and lower income Americans (damn few Jews gamble). Or Katzenberg, Zukerberg and Zuker....or any of the Goldman Sachs's billionaires (from there corrupt 'financial products').

    http://www.ifcj.org/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwkd3VBRDzARIsAAdGzMBT48n0jgMp0eDxmZr4_w5z3W32nygVqKdRVUx2jU4j1By5dtEVFjsaAgzaEALw_wcB

    The video featured on this site (watch it) has run on Fox (targeting Evangelicals) several times.
    It is disgusting..

    I see it often in various channels. There’s also one about feeding the starving holocaust survivors in Russia. The Russian survivors dress in rags and blankets. They live in huts with no heat and sleep on the floor on piles of rags.

    They are hysterically funny. The aged crones are covered in inch deep wrinkles and dirt and haven’t combed their hair in years. The Passover packages are necessary because neither the Israeli nor Russian Jews can afford a decent Passover dinner.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist

    They are hysterically funny
     
    They are funny, but it shows the amoral lack of shame many Jews have.
    , @Macon Richardson
    Since there were no Jewish concentration camps in Russia, I find it hard to imagine survivors of them.
    , @Wally
    "holocaust survivors"?

    Don't make me laugh.

    If there was the alleged ‘plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$"?

    Follow the money.

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. yurivku says:

    The Tatars and Ukrainians did not resent Putin’s words. The Russian Jews in Russia dismissed it, too. For a good reason: the taboo on the word ‘Jew’ is not universal. It does not exist in Russia. Russia is the land of many native ethnicities, a hundred and fifty or so, from Yakut to Mordva, and people freely refer to all of them without fear.

    Actually it’s not true. Such taboo exists in Russia and saying something about Jews publicly will have consequences. They (Jews) are in majority in MSM and immediately begin to shout loudly on “antisemitism” if anybody used J-word in connection with something bad. Same like in US, but probably in lesser extent.

    But yes, we can use J-word when saying words of admiration. And Negro-word it’s not an insulting here, but just a racial characteristic.

    But for Putin it’s ok to use this J-word ;-). Probably he won’t be seriously punished.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. Realist says:
    @Anon
    I see it often in various channels. There’s also one about feeding the starving holocaust survivors in Russia. The Russian survivors dress in rags and blankets. They live in huts with no heat and sleep on the floor on piles of rags.

    They are hysterically funny. The aged crones are covered in inch deep wrinkles and dirt and haven’t combed their hair in years. The Passover packages are necessary because neither the Israeli nor Russian Jews can afford a decent Passover dinner.

    They are hysterically funny

    They are funny, but it shows the amoral lack of shame many Jews have.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Yesterday I wrote in the website ‘talkclassical.com’ a Jewish joke in the ‘Community Forum’-section that is meant for “This is the place for those fun, and not so serious threads, birthday greetings, & general chit-chat. Above all, be respectful to your fellow forum members as they have a right to their own opinions too!” The joke however was removed quite soon. Probably because of the word ‘Jew’ the occurred once in it. (The joke is about an elephant selling merchant; it is printed in a book “The most beautiful Jewish stories”).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Here's a riddle:

    If a jew expresses an opinion and his wife or daughter isn't there to hear it, is he still wrong?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Twodees Partain
    EL Doctorow, in his novel "Ragtime", named his main Jewish character Baron Ashkenazi. The Baron was a cinema pioneer who started out as a silhouette artist selling his art on the street on the lower east side of NYC and being referred to only as "Tateh" before his transformation into a wealthy studio owner.

    That was the first reference I remember seeing to the Ashkenazi euphemism and it stuck with me for decades. In the small southern town where I lived as a child, there were two Jewish families, and the fathers of both families were store owners. It wasn't considered rude to refer to them as jews if I recall correctly. It was, though, a common practice to accuse gentile business people of being jews if they were dishonest or too shrewd in their business practices.

    "Jew" was used as a verb to describe haggling over a price. I still hear that use of the word from time to time, as in, "I wanted $2500 for that car but he jewed me down to $2200."

    I, too, growing up in the south in the 1940s and 1950s knew only the term “to jew him down.” I was at university before I knew what a Jew was. I got that information from a Yankee Jew who was dating my cousin.

    I knew that some of my friends were Jews but didn’t know what that meant. To me, Jews in my school and neighborhood were like Lebanese, Syrians, Greeks and Italians, people who had a darker complexion than us kids who were of English and Scots descent.

    I suppose that because we had Negroes to blame for all the world’s ills, we didn’t need Jews to blame.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    I understand that, Macon. My own experience differs, probably because my dad was a friend of one of the few jews in our little town. I went to school with one jewish kid for awhile before he left for private school, so I had known a few jews and understood the way the word 'jew' was being used as a verb as well as an adjective.

    It seemed a little comical to me then and it still does.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Seraphim
    Nazi is a byword for "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

    But:
    "The term "Nazi" was in use before the rise of the NSDAP as a colloquial and derogatory word for a backwards farmer or peasant, characterizing an awkward and clumsy person. This was derived from Nazi a hypocorism of the German men's name Ignatz (itself a variation of the men's name Ignatius) – Ignatz being a common name at the time in Bavaria, the area from which the NSDAP emerged.
    In the 1920s, political opponents of the NSDAP in the German labour movement seized on this and – using the earlier abbreviated term "Sozi" for Sozialist (English: Socialist) as an example – shortened the first part of the party's name, [Na]tionalso[zi]alistische, to the dismissive "Nazi", in order to associate them with the derogatory use of the term mentioned above" (Wikipedia).

    There is no such 'thing' as Nazism. It was National Socialism, as it was a National Bolshevism. An offspring of the Socialist movement, without the 'international' characteristics (which characterized Marxism). "Labor Zionism" is a National Socialist movement.

    Thank you, Seraphim, for correcting MEFOBILLS foolish error and thanks for the complete etymology of the word NAZI.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Anon
    I see it often in various channels. There’s also one about feeding the starving holocaust survivors in Russia. The Russian survivors dress in rags and blankets. They live in huts with no heat and sleep on the floor on piles of rags.

    They are hysterically funny. The aged crones are covered in inch deep wrinkles and dirt and haven’t combed their hair in years. The Passover packages are necessary because neither the Israeli nor Russian Jews can afford a decent Passover dinner.

    Since there were no Jewish concentration camps in Russia, I find it hard to imagine survivors of them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Seraphim
    Nazi is a byword for "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

    But:
    "The term "Nazi" was in use before the rise of the NSDAP as a colloquial and derogatory word for a backwards farmer or peasant, characterizing an awkward and clumsy person. This was derived from Nazi a hypocorism of the German men's name Ignatz (itself a variation of the men's name Ignatius) – Ignatz being a common name at the time in Bavaria, the area from which the NSDAP emerged.
    In the 1920s, political opponents of the NSDAP in the German labour movement seized on this and – using the earlier abbreviated term "Sozi" for Sozialist (English: Socialist) as an example – shortened the first part of the party's name, [Na]tionalso[zi]alistische, to the dismissive "Nazi", in order to associate them with the derogatory use of the term mentioned above" (Wikipedia).

    There is no such 'thing' as Nazism. It was National Socialism, as it was a National Bolshevism. An offspring of the Socialist movement, without the 'international' characteristics (which characterized Marxism). "Labor Zionism" is a National Socialist movement.

    That’s a distinction without a difference, really. I wouldn’t put too much faith in wikipedia for etymology of a term, especially if it leads to the conclusion that “There is no such ‘thing’ as Nazism.”

    “Nazism” appears to be just an easy reference word for National Socialism, and isn’t so easily dismissed as a useful descriptor. There’s no need to labor over minutiae in terms used to discuss a defunct political system. Those who don’t realize that National Socialism was still a form of socialism aren’t likely to be educated, while those who do understand don’t need to be led aside to debate how many socialists can dance upon the head of a pin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    The distinction is necessary. The use of 'Nazi ' might be convenient for discussion (it is a universal tendency to speak in initials, mainly due to laziness). But 'Nazism' was made to mean anti-semitism, racism, simply 'the baddies' (like 'fascism'). The socialist origin is deliberately absconded. It is not PC to know that NSDAP had a very left-leaning wing (admirers of Lenin and Trotsky).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Macon Richardson
    I, too, growing up in the south in the 1940s and 1950s knew only the term "to jew him down." I was at university before I knew what a Jew was. I got that information from a Yankee Jew who was dating my cousin.

    I knew that some of my friends were Jews but didn't know what that meant. To me, Jews in my school and neighborhood were like Lebanese, Syrians, Greeks and Italians, people who had a darker complexion than us kids who were of English and Scots descent.

    I suppose that because we had Negroes to blame for all the world's ills, we didn't need Jews to blame.

    I understand that, Macon. My own experience differs, probably because my dad was a friend of one of the few jews in our little town. I went to school with one jewish kid for awhile before he left for private school, so I had known a few jews and understood the way the word ‘jew’ was being used as a verb as well as an adjective.

    It seemed a little comical to me then and it still does.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @All we like sheep
    Yesterday I wrote in the website 'talkclassical.com' a Jewish joke in the 'Community Forum'-section that is meant for "This is the place for those fun, and not so serious threads, birthday greetings, & general chit-chat. Above all, be respectful to your fellow forum members as they have a right to their own opinions too!" The joke however was removed quite soon. Probably because of the word 'Jew' the occurred once in it. (The joke is about an elephant selling merchant; it is printed in a book "The most beautiful Jewish stories").

    Here’s a riddle:

    If a jew expresses an opinion and his wife or daughter isn’t there to hear it, is he still wrong?

    Read More
    • Replies: @All we like sheep
    I guess he's still wrong, but please explain!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @CalDre
    Largely witty article but as to the substantive matters:

    * “Semite” is rarely used, whereas “anti-Semitism” is used, almost universally by those who desire to censor, with the usage having no logical connection to what it connotes (a desire to "exterminate" or at a minimum a fanatical hatred) or to the group it designates (Semites, which is largely Arabs, the true victims of Jewish anti-Semitism).
    * "Masons" is entirely orthogonal to Jews. Masons are secret societies of non-Jews which were used (and still are used) by the Blue Bloods as their primary (and very effective) control mechanism.
    * "Khazar" is hardly used and few know what it means.
    * "Ashkenazi" is largely synonymous with Khazars, but also is not used except amongst those who are Jews or who study Jews.
    * "Zionist" is not at all a synonym for Jews, though a few of lesser intelligence will use it with that connotation. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge of the world knows that a great many Zionists are non-Jews, though one might argue they are all Jew toadies (even unwitting ones, like the readers of the fraudulent Scofield Reference Bible). And of course some number of Jews, unfortunately relatively small, are not Zionists (a/k/a violent Jew supremacists).
    * “Reptilian” is not related to Jews either, though it is related to the "underworld" and many may believe Kabbalistic Jews have greater connections to this underworld than, say, Catholics. But let's be honest, "New Yorker" is not a synonym for Jew either.
    * "Illuminati" is like Zionists, it includes Jews and non-Jews (as well as excluding some Jews), though a different set from each group. It is basically a combination of two organized groups: the Elders (Jewish royalty) and their Jew followers, and the Blue Bloods (White royalty) and their masonic followers. Together they pack a massive whallop.

    Though Mr. Shamir forgot "tribalist", I will grant, this most often refers to Jews. "Neo-con", on the other hand, is more akin to "fanatical Zionist".

    “Coasties”?

    I’ve met Italian Catholics from LawnGuyland who use more Yiddish than Jews who grew up in midwestern small towns.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. annamaria says:
    @Yorem
    My grandfather, a Hasidic Mohel, called the Jews from Eastern Europe the Cockroaches....the ones that cause all the trouble.

    “Cockroaches….”
    Kristolls, Pletka, Kagans, Rubin, Perle, Ledeen, Feifth, Podhorets, Muravchik, Frum and more — a crowd of quarrelsome, dishonest, poorly-mannered, shameless and obnoxious bloviators, many festering profitably in various stink-tanks with the next-war agenda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Lots of good comments, agree on the dual citizen and AIPAC FARA things, its ridiculous…
    The “globalists” should come out of their bubble and realize that the “antisemites” are only trying to save the “globalists” from themselves..
    Globalists are the globalists worst enemy.
    Don’t know why they refuse to see this. The writing is all over the wall in big ass bold letters.

    On the 9/11 matter…see USS Liberty and Lavon Affair.
    On the JFK matter as well as other political assassinations Yitzhak Rabin, Yasir Arafat, they let this one slip, oops :
    Atlanta Jewish Times featured a column by its owner-publisher suggesting that U.S.-based Israeli Mossad agents might someday need to “order a hit” on the president of the United States.

    http://original.antiwar.com/alison-weir/2012/01/24/israeli-assassinations-and-american-presidents/

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/284979-ajt.html

    On Jan. 13 the Atlanta Jewish Times featured a column by its owner-publisher suggesting that Israel might someday need to “order a hit” on the president of the United States.
    In the column, publisher Andrew Adler describes a scenario in which Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu would need to “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel.”
    The purpose? So that the vice president could then take office and dictate U.S. policies that would help the Jewish state “obliterate its enemies.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  88. @Twodees Partain
    Here's a riddle:

    If a jew expresses an opinion and his wife or daughter isn't there to hear it, is he still wrong?

    I guess he’s still wrong, but please explain!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Stereotypically, a jew is always told his opinion is wrong and/or offensive by his wife and daughter(s). If you don't get it, you don't know any jewish fathers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. BR549 says:
    @TelfoedJohn
    Jews believe in a massive conspiracy theory that anti-Jewish feeling is due to anything except their own behaviour.

    That single sentence of yours conveys millennia of human misery; one small group of selfish xenophobes, who see their lack of personal integrity as a virtue, have managed to dominate the planet simply by exploiting those deep-seated human traits that the rest of the world had hoped to evolve beyond. Perhaps for that reason, the Jews are a reminder that we have NOT evolved, as an entire race, nearly as far as we think we have. An albatross upon the neck of humanity seems more fitting.

    When I speak of the Jews, in this sense, I am referring to those who, when forced to choose between God and supporting their internal religious politics ……… will ALWAYS choose their politics. Who knows what the actual ratio of good to bad Jews is, but like their equally challenged Islamic brethren, they will continue to chastise any of even their own who don’t toe the party line. That doesn’t sound very God-like to me.

    I’ve always believed that the allegory of Abraham was meant to address the inherent violent nature of all those Middle-Eastern tribesmen who had this genetic propensity to slaughter their neighbors and never forgive them as enemies. Sound familiar? Whether we are talking Arabs or Jews, it’s SSDD, yet their perpetual battle has become a means for the rest of humanity to view the fossilized remains of human spiritual development. As long as there is this “us vs. them” mindset, we can continually remind ourselves how little we have advanced in the last 4,000 years or so.

    Had anyone actually been paying any attention instead of falling victim to their own ego, they would have recognized the need to see Ishmael as part of the family of Abraham. Hagar’s use as a surrogate to continue the tribal bloodline was an accepted practice back then and Sarah’s problematic infertility was merely a way to force illiterate tribesmen sitting by a late night campfire to wrestle with the perceived definitions of just who was worthy of assuming a tribal identity. The writers of the O.T. were brilliant in that way because they saw no improvement in hostilities …….. until the issue was brought closer to home.

    Then too, one must have two points in order to set a course. Without respecting their nomadic tribal roots as a foundation, they would have no home port from which to set a direction to any higher ideal. The majority of so-called “religious” followers (on all sides) completely ignore the dysfunctionality of the House of Abraham. It was no different than a 3,000 year old soap opera, and individuals would instead use the allegory to justify their continued unconscious enslavement within their own arrested spiritual development.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. @Ilyana_Rozumova
    There is a lot of criticism of Jewish behavior and most of it is justified.
    But Jews also did a lot of good in countries and societies where they lived particularly by promoting trade. Promoting trade resulted in accelerating progress of the society.
    Behavior of Jews was greatly influenced by what did happen in Medina.

    covering for the “globalists” I see!! ;) ;)

    By the way, Jews were spread across, not only the greater middle east, but some of them had even reached European shores before “Medina” was ever a city of any significance!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Wally says:
    @Anon
    I see it often in various channels. There’s also one about feeding the starving holocaust survivors in Russia. The Russian survivors dress in rags and blankets. They live in huts with no heat and sleep on the floor on piles of rags.

    They are hysterically funny. The aged crones are covered in inch deep wrinkles and dirt and haven’t combed their hair in years. The Passover packages are necessary because neither the Israeli nor Russian Jews can afford a decent Passover dinner.

    “holocaust survivors”?

    Don’t make me laugh.

    If there was the alleged ‘plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ as alleged, then why are there countless numbers of so called “survivor$”?

    Follow the money.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @All we like sheep
    I guess he's still wrong, but please explain!

    Stereotypically, a jew is always told his opinion is wrong and/or offensive by his wife and daughter(s). If you don’t get it, you don’t know any jewish fathers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Seraphim says:
    @Twodees Partain
    That's a distinction without a difference, really. I wouldn't put too much faith in wikipedia for etymology of a term, especially if it leads to the conclusion that "There is no such ‘thing’ as Nazism."

    "Nazism" appears to be just an easy reference word for National Socialism, and isn't so easily dismissed as a useful descriptor. There's no need to labor over minutiae in terms used to discuss a defunct political system. Those who don't realize that National Socialism was still a form of socialism aren't likely to be educated, while those who do understand don't need to be led aside to debate how many socialists can dance upon the head of a pin.

    The distinction is necessary. The use of ‘Nazi ‘ might be convenient for discussion (it is a universal tendency to speak in initials, mainly due to laziness). But ‘Nazism’ was made to mean anti-semitism, racism, simply ‘the baddies’ (like ‘fascism’). The socialist origin is deliberately absconded. It is not PC to know that NSDAP had a very left-leaning wing (admirers of Lenin and Trotsky).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @Uncle Sam
    I disagree. Kennedy was killed because he was trying to have Castro killed. So Castro killed Kennedy in self defense. There is a documentary that deals with that situation. I don't believe it has ever been shown here in the U.S., but it is online. It is titled "A Rendezvous with Death: Why John F. Kennedy Had to Die."

    It explains everything.

    Another great explanation is
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Uncle Sam
    Are the Jewish people fools? Haven't they learned anything from their history? Don't they realize that their domineering ways will eventually lead to catastrophe? People who do not learn from experience are --- to put it bluntly---stupid. There is no other way to put it. When it comes to such critical matters, the Jewish people have shown limited intelligence.

    Insofar as America is concerned, the Jewish people (certainly not all of them but a sizable number of them) have made a complete, total and utter mockery out of the American political system, such that that system has lost its effectiveness and relevancy to the American people; in fact, it has become a danger to these same people. It could result in a Third World War.

    American Gentiles cannot defend themselves from the Jewish influence under this so-called "democratic system", which in practice is nothing more than a plutocracy. Indeed, just about every government in the western world is a plutocracy, if its political system can be manipulated by money, which certainly appears to be the case. Jewish money plays a large role in these situations.

    I am afraid that it will take a Caesar, Napoleon, or the proverbial man on the white horse to seize the reins of power in America to restore some degree of political legitimacy and sanity to America. One of the first things that should be done is to force AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbies to register with the Justice Department as agents of a foreign government. Right now, American law in that regard is being blatantly violated by these lobbies and the politicians in Washington, being the spineless cowards that they are, allow these organizations to conduct their activities without any check on them whatsoever.

    ” Are the Jewish people fools? Haven’t they learned anything from their history? ”

    Alas yes and no.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. TheJester says:
    @anon
    What kind of amazing cosmic coincidence is it that the work Ashkenazi literally has "Nazi" in it?

    Playing with words that mean something …

    What few people appreciate is that the Nazis got their political, ethnic, and tribal paradigms from the Jews. The Nazis were a reactionary lot reacting to their political, economic, and social experiences in the Weimar Republic. Cowering under the economic and cultural “boot” of the Jews, in self-defense they forthrightly adopted the Jewish “tribal” paradigm and applied it to the Germans … previously among the most open-minded and least nationalistic of the peoples in the ethnic melting pot called Central and Eastern Europe.

    Hence, it is not strange to find disturbing similarities between Zionist and Nazi ideologies. They have the same social and historical roots: a threatened and wounded populace reorganizing and reemerging as a “revanche” society (the root is “revenge”) … going through seemingly endless cycles of being debased followed by active revauchism.

    While the Germans are lately prone to acts of cultural and national suicide as penance for their last revanche(ment) against the Jews, the Jews have sought safety and dissimulation in presenting themselves as a permanent “victim group” who are objects of world-wide hate for apparently no reason at all. They have conveniently forgotten their historical crimes against the peoples of Eastern and Central Europe, and more recently, their on-going crimes against the non-Jewish population of the United States.

    Hence, it is tempting to see the Jews as engaging in seemingly endless cycles of self-immolation as they react to the seemingly endless cycles of revanchism on the part of virtually every other ethnic group with which they have had contact across the millenniums. However, for some reason, Jews like to interpret this as evidence of a sacred ennui that identifies them as “God’s chosen people” … which only prepares them for their next cycle of debasing a local population followed by the latter’s inevitable revanchism in self-defense.

    The question is, who has the power to stop this stupidity? Those guilty of debasing or those guilty of revanchism?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Dmitry says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    'Ashkenazi' is Hebrew for Germans.

    No, Ashkenazi comes from ‘Ashkenazi’, who was believed to have kingdom in Scythia – a Northern region.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    Original Kingdom of Ashkenaz - if applied to Scythians - was likely identified as somewhere in the North. It likely became a kind of generic name in rabbinic texts for Northern regions.


    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Scythia-Parthia_100_BC.png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Dmitry says:

    Putin story was just a typical language confusion, nothing very interesting. In English, they just don’t have this distinction between nationality and a Russian citizen (rossiyanin) .

    Ksenia Svetlova is part of the left-wing opposition in Israel, she does not rely on Russian-speaking voters. She speaks Arabic, and has a lot of pro-Arab sympathy, and you can see a lot of stories in the blogs about her – how she dresses up. If she stayed in Moscow, she would be professor of Arabic, or working for diplomatic affairs related to Arabic-speaking countries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. Dmitry says:
    @Dmitry
    No, Ashkenazi comes from 'Ashkenazi', who was believed to have kingdom in Scythia - a Northern region.

    Original Kingdom of Ashkenaz – if applied to Scythians – was likely identified as somewhere in the North. It likely became a kind of generic name in rabbinic texts for Northern regions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    True enough. Although it was applied to Germany: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Etymology
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. gwynedd1 says:

    Such a mystery. A people that refers to themselves as God’s chosen people rubs other people the wrong way?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. @Dmitry
    Original Kingdom of Ashkenaz - if applied to Scythians - was likely identified as somewhere in the North. It likely became a kind of generic name in rabbinic texts for Northern regions.


    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Scythia-Parthia_100_BC.png

    True enough. Although it was applied to Germany: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Etymology

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Yakov says:

    Israel Shamir is the pen name of a self-hating convert to Christianity. Nothing he says should be taken seriously. Ignore him. His evil face and lying eyes say it all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. APB says:
    @Uncle Sam
    I disagree. Kennedy was killed because he was trying to have Castro killed. So Castro killed Kennedy in self defense. There is a documentary that deals with that situation. I don't believe it has ever been shown here in the U.S., but it is online. It is titled "A Rendezvous with Death: Why John F. Kennedy Had to Die."

    It explains everything.

    I don’t believe Castro killed Kennedy at all, why would he? JFK was in secret back channel communications with Castro at the time of his death. JFK was killed most likely by the CIA who saw him as an existential threat, especially after his remark “I want to break them into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the wind”. They saw him as a threat and moved first.
    Certainly David ben Gurion and JFK intensely disliked each other to say the least, JFK refused to condone Israel developing a nuke so it most suited Israel to have JFK die. Very possibly JFK was a joint CIA and Mossad operation.
    Read JFK and the Unspeakable by James W Douglass for an excellent analysis of what happened.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Owen C. says:

    I’ve noticed for a while now that you can determine which Slavic-speaking countries are pro-Russian by what they call Jews. Only the Russians themselves, the Serbs and the Bulgarians call Jews “evrei”, while Ukrainians, Belarusians, Poles, Czechoslovaks and Croats call them “zhidovi”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @yurivku
    Nice method. Jewcentric. But there are many other ones - e.g. expelling diplomats, joining NATO...
    But for Jew your way is certainly the best
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. yurivku says:
    @Owen C.
    I've noticed for a while now that you can determine which Slavic-speaking countries are pro-Russian by what they call Jews. Only the Russians themselves, the Serbs and the Bulgarians call Jews "evrei", while Ukrainians, Belarusians, Poles, Czechoslovaks and Croats call them "zhidovi".

    Nice method. Jewcentric. But there are many other ones – e.g. expelling diplomats, joining NATO…
    But for Jew your way is certainly the best

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Anonymous[295] • Disclaimer says:

    i think israel shamir should stop writing and ron unz stop publising articles like this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS