The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
The Deep State vs. Netanyahu: Lawyers and Statemen
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Lawyers have a very dubious reputation. Since the days of old, they were considered scumbags; advocates being shysters at best; judges as despotic tyrants at worst. Half a millennium ago, Maître Rabelais said: There is no cause so bad that it does not find itself an advocate, otherwise there would be no lawsuits in the world. Judges were considered even worse; the best judge is the one who decides the case by drawing lots, added the Renaissance writer. And still, in his days the legal profession presented a threat but to a private person, not to the realm or to the order of things. Judges are extremely conservative, generalised Vladimir Lenin, himself a lawyer by education, in the beginning of the 20th century.

Well, they aren’t conservative anymore; they are full of zeal to reshape the world. The United States had been the first (and for a long time the only) country in the world to turn yesterday’s scumbags into a powerful threat to the common sense and to the order of things. The legal establishment is omnipotent in the Shining City upon the Hill. They destroyed the tobacco industry by a single decision, ordering sot-weed factors to pay billions to people who enjoyed their smooth and cooling smoke; they ruined Palestine by ordering them and Iranians to pay billions to the Jews who fought them. They may decide that abortion or same-sex marriage is a universal right, while free education and health care are not. They may forbid stopping a foreign invasion, but allow impoverishment of the native citizenry. There never was a king as powerful as the US legal establishment.

The impeachment trial of President Trump is an attempt to dislodge a legitimately elected ruler by quasi-legal methods. If his opponents would rely upon the US voters, they wouldn’t go into this farce. But they know they can’t win; that’s why they want to remove Trump by trying him for his alleged crimes.

In many countries the leaders had been tried and imprisoned, usually on the basis of unsubstantiated claims of ‘corruption’. If in the past, the rulers rarely went to jail; unless after a coup or military defeat; now they are arrested and sentenced at a drop of a hat for disobeying the Deep State orders, too. (The Wikipedia list is whimsical but useful.) In such a way, the leaders are reminded that elections are not the most important thing: they must also act in accordance with the will of establishment, national and Western. If populists are doing what the people want disregarding the establishment’s will, they may well end in prison, like the presidents of Brazil and Argentina did. “Nobody is above the Law!” the lawyers exclaim when they send another leader to jail; and they add, “This is the rule of Law!”

Sorry to say, the rule of law is not a wonderful thing. We have a stark choice whether we want democracy, or the rule of law. These two regimes are not identical, – they stand in direct opposition. In a democracy, the people rule via their elected representatives; under the rule of law, the judges rule supreme. Yes there is the Law, but the judges interpret it as they see fit. They may nullify a law, or reinterpret it in an entirely different vein.

This new tendency of using Law as a tool in politics is the gift of Jews to perplexed mankind. The Jews were traditionally ruled by sages, or judges. Theoretically, Talmudic sages interpreted the Law of Halacha, but actually the rule of Halacha was the rule by sages, and only the Enlightenment broke its iron grip. Jews were set free, but this freedom did not last long. As the world increasingly Judaises, the sages take over the decision-making all over the world.

In England, the Supreme Court had been established quite recently, in 2009, and already it has stopped PM Johnson from achieving Brexit on time. In the US with its highly advanced Judaisation, the Supreme Court blocked every initiative of President Trump. The old witch Ruth Bader Ginsburg, though unelected by the people, still is more powerful than the US President. The legal establishment supported by media can make elections meaningless.

These two non-elected and non-democratic powers of Media and Judiciary entered into conspiracy against the elected parliament and government.

In the smaller Jewish state of Israel, the judges want to govern. They think they know better what should be done than elected statesmen; and they find Bibi Netanyahu too independently minded. He is too friendly with Donald Trump and (God save us!) even with Mr Putin. Netanyahu developed his own electoral base; he does not obey the old elites. For the last few years they have tried to remove Bibi and substitute him with a more pliable politician, like they did years ago with Ehud Olmert.

Ehud Olmert did not have a snowball’s chance in hell. Every day the newspapers and the TV channels broadcast new accusations against him and informed of fresh police investigations. Often the Israeli public learned of Olmert’s alleged misdeeds before the Prime Minister himself did. Police did not just leak the details of the case – they poured it out like tropical torrent. The police went after him; the Supreme Court began deliberations, while newspapers and the TV blew it out of proportion. Thus two mighty powers of Israeli politics, the media and the legal system, united in one effort to unseat Olmert, and he caved in. This episode demonstrated who actually runs Israel. Though media amplifies, the judges judge.

Now, Netanyahu is getting the same treatment. The Police leak horror stories from an investigation room to a selected journalist, and he would spill it all over media. Every time Bibi asked to make accusations public and to allow him to defend himself openly, the Attorney General refused him saying he does not want to have a trial by media – while doing exactly that.


It is hard to sympathise with the war criminal Netanyahu; but he has an advantage of being elected, while his opponents were appointed. Olmert ended in jail, and they want to send Netanyahu to jail, too. Not for murdering thousands of Palestinians, neither for destroying thousands of homes, but for something technical, like the silly quid pro quo reason of Trump’s impeachment. The idea was that his electorate would desert him if he were charged with crimes. But they had not enough stuff for the proper charge, until they got confessions of Netanyahu’s minions.

Last week the Israeli Justice Minister shocked the public. He had revealed the methods used by the judicial establishment against Netanyahu. These methods are remarkably similar to those applied by the Deep State against President Trump. It is threats, extortion and blackmail. Israeli police assaulted Bibi’s assistants like Trump’s enemies attacked Manafort, Cohen, Stone.

When an investigative journalist wanted to publish how the confessions were squeezed out of Bibi’s confidante, the judicial authorities immediately slammed him with a gagging order.

Israelis are prompt to gag the publication of whatever the authorities do not like. Only after many years the Israeli people had learned that their authorities stole children from Yemeni Jews, treated Moroccan children skin diseases by X-raying them to death, sterilised Ethiopian women, blew up synagogues in Baghdad, kidnapped the nuclear technician Vanunu in Rome, bombed the USS Liberty and poisoned drinking water in Acre. All these crimes were protected by a gagging order from prying eyes.

There is a nuclear option, how to lift the ban. A member of the Knesset (parliament) is not required to comply with the media blackout; he can speak from the rostrum and say everything – and then the newspapers can print. That is how we had learned of the Kafr Qassem massacre. (The gagging order was broken by the Communist MK Tawfik Toubi – and then the whole world learned of the Palestinian village that was surrounded and decimated by the Jewish soldiers.)

The nuclear option had been used by the Justice Minister Ohana. He told the Knesset (and to the Israeli public) that police threw Bibi’s confidante in prison forcing him to confirm their version of events. For two weeks he was holding out, but then they brought his mistress to the prison. ‘This is the end of your peaceful family life’, they told him. ‘We’ll show your girlfriend to your wife’. Afterwards, they took him to an unknown destination where the protocols were not kept. When he came back, the assistant “confessed everything”. His ‘revelations’ were dictated to him, and then leaked into the press.

Israeli liberal left had been united in condemnation – not of the police with its forbidden methods, but of the Justice Minister who dared to blow away media blackout. This is a mistake. The left and the right should defend sovereignty and democracy, instead of allowing legal establishment to make important decisions. Let elected politicians decide, while the judges should limit themselves to non-political cases.

The true Left and true Right are more similar to each other, for these movements have their basis in the people’s will. They seek the people’s approval; they try to attract the people to their side. Even the most far out political movements, from Fascists to Communists, still turn to the people for their mandate. Deep down, they are democratic, for they believe in Majority Rule. The lawyers do not.

The British Labour Party had made a similar error of judgement. They were happy like children when the Supreme Court overruled Johnson’s decision. Next time, if and when Jeremy Corbyn will decide to take England out of NATO, the Supreme Court will surely overrule him. It is easy to lose one’s power and it’s hard to recover it.

People enjoy revenge, but I’ll tell you: statesmen should remain immune from prosecution for life. There is a normal way to end statesman’s tenure: to elect somebody else in his stead. The legal recourse is no recourse at all, but an assault on democracy. And even after the tenure is over, the statesman should remain immune. Otherwise, he will think more of fitting the lawyers’ agenda than of serving the nation. I regret the fate of Milosevic and Saddam Hussein; their trials were travesty of justice. They weren’t worse, just less lucky than Tony Blair or Bill Clinton. And that is true regarding Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu, as well. They are not angels, for sure; but they were elected by their nations and should remain untouched. Let them be judged by history, not by lawyers.

As for lawyers, the Americans would do well to roll their powers back. Perhaps, Denis Diderot was right and Man will never be free until the last lawyer is strangled with the entrails of the last banker.

Read also

Israel Shamir can be reached at [email protected]

This article was first published at The Unz Review

• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Benjamin Netanyahu, Deep State, Israel 
Hide 88 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. What percentage of the federal judiciary is Jewish?

  2. Svevlad says:

    Eh, there is a way – form a hitsquad and then give ’em lead poisoning cartel style. No judge, no trial.

    Albeit democracy is just as bad. Nation thinking with its ass and not head

  3. 1U says:

    “The rule of law is not a wonderful thing.” There’s law and there’s law. In the US and Israel law is procedure as pretext for arbitrary rule. Outside the Iron Curtain in the civilized world, depending on the degree of US interference, law is something very different,

    and the civilized world never lets the US forget it.

    Judges may be powerful in Israel but in the US they’re groveling flunkies of the people with impunity.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  4. Alf alpha says:

    A caveat: when describing the US, the deep state is a euphemism that diverts attention from the thing we’re trying to talk about. It fuzzes up the crucial attribute of the US command structure and camouflages the edges of the thing in question.

    Above Zuesse shows how the Mockingbird media scrambled to circumscribe discourse by appropriating the term. The deep state coinage panicked CIA because it revived Bagehot’s long-buried distinction between the efficient and dignified states. In the US the dignified state is terminally degenerate, a vestigial organ, and the efficient state rules openly with a flimsy veneer of cant.

    The only significant attribute of this state is impunity. You know how John Bolton got his big job as Trump’s ventriloquist? He obstructed drafting of the World Summit outcome document to keep the word impunity out of the relevant paragraph. He entered 700 amendments and made it clear he would not stop until the unspeakable word was suppressed. So can we not circumlocute any more? Let’s talk about the locus of impunity. Then it’s very simple. The state is CIA. They delegate a lot but they make sure it all gets done. How? Impunity. They can kill you and torture you and get away with it. If you can do that, you’re in charge. We see Justice flunkies who work for CIA. We see cowering judges suck CIA dick. Everything else is pageantry.

    It’s undeniable, plain as the nose on your face. Now the DCI is a torturer, shown to be implicated in the crime against humanity of systematic and widespread torture. She’s a criminal in universal jurisdiction. And she runs an agency with the power to make state secrets of the facts of crimes, the identity of the criminals, and their legal pretexts. This DCI’s the head of state. End of story. She has the absolute sovereignty of the most tyrannical king.

    When Chris Hedges tried to go to the Supreme Court to contest the arbitrary powers in the NDAA, mighty RBG blew him off. Who lent him a sympathetic ear? That swine Scalia. Now RBG’s every woman’s action-figure hero. Scalia ate a pillow at Cibolo Creek Ranch. See?

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  5. Anonymous[313] • Disclaimer says:

    Sadly the trial lawyer profession isn’t doing so well. tort reform and ultra-corporatist judges have made it nearly impossible for people who have been injured to get their compensation. Trial/consumer lawyers are pretty decent folk. Mike Papantonio comes to mind.

    The enemy is corporate judges and lawyers.

    • Agree: davidgmillsatty
  6. A123 says:

    A proper constitution was never formed in Israel. The temporary basic law allows the judiciary to pick replacement judges. This temporary provision should have ended decades ago, but it remains in force even though it undermines the values and purpose of the Jewish State. As such, the judiciary no longer has credibility in the eyes of the Israeli people.

    The one upside to the situation is that the Knesset can pass a resolution allowing Knesset review of judicial decisions. Once judges can no longer abuse the law, being a far left wingnut judge will be much less attractive as an employment proptect.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Skeptikal
  7. They have been trying to get rid of him for the better part of a decade. They have convinced themselves that getting a more pliable puppet like Gantz or another army brat would solve Israel’s PR problems. In the end, Netanyahu’s policies are not that radical, it is just his crass behaviour and petty corruption that irks them. Gantz bragged in the run-up to the recent election that annexing the whole of the WB was his idea and that Netanyahu had stolen it.

    In the end, I’d wager we’d see a coalition government with Netanyahu and Gantz. The whole furore is much ado about nothing.

    • Replies: @israel shamir
  8. @Thulean Friend

    much ado about nothing

    Yes, I agree, but it is an occasion to observe the methods of Israeli police with their brutality. Totally immoral. And the legal machinery, fully integrated with police and media.

    • Replies: @anon
  9. teeth [AKA "bredin"] says:

    How come ISIS never attacks Israel’s open air inbreeding facilities?

  10. renfro says:

    Joking about his impeachment inquiry, Trump says: ..

    ‘If anything happens here, I’m taking a trip to Israel, I’ll be prime minister there’

    Trump still doesnt get that the Jews he brought into his adm ,who then brought in more Jews to fill every government agency and position have ruined him….literally ruined him.
    The stupidity of him not being able to see how he has been used and what they have done in directing US policy is beyond description.

    • Agree: druid55, Hegar
    • Replies: @Alfred
    , @Daniel Rich
  11. renfro says:

    Imagine what the Palestines could do if they had some weapons.

    The Wadi al-Haramiya sniper attack was a Palestinian sniper attack against Israeli soldiers and civilians on March 3, 2002. A lone Palestinian sniper,
    22-year-old Tha’ir Kayid Hamad (Arabic: ثائر كايد حماد‎), a member of al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades from the village of Silwad carried out the attack. He had acquired an old Second World War Mauser rifle and 30 rounds of ammunition and had done target practice in the valleys around Silwad. Hamad managed to kill seven Israeli soldiers and three civilians before escaping. He was arrested two years later and sentenced to life imprisonment, and is currently imprisoned in Israel.

    The incident
    Wadi al-Haramiya (Arabic: وادي الحرامية‎), meaning ‘Valley of the Thieves'[1] is a valley between Ramallah and Nablus on the West Bank.
    The IDF was maintaining a checkpoint at Uyoun al-Haramiya (the Wells of Haramiya), near the Israeli settlement Ofra, manned by a reserve company.
    Before dawn on the morning of 3 March 2002 the sniper positioned himself under some olive trees on a hilltop overlooking the checkpoint. At 6:40 he opened fire at the three soldiers manning the checkpoint and the driver of a civilian car, which had stopped at the checkpoint. All four were killed within minutes. Nine Israeli soldiers were inside a barracks building. Platoon commander Lieutenant David Damelin and the unit’s medic Yochai Porat emerged from the building to locate the shooter and assist the casualties. Both were shot dead. The remaining soldiers decided to stay inside the building and called for reinforcements.[2]
    A patrol jeep that arrived with reinforcements immediately came under fire. The reserve company’s sergeant, Avraham Ezra, was killed and several of his men were injured. The rest of the casualties occurred when randomly arriving civilian cars stopped at the checkpoint. Three Israeli civilians and an IDF officer were killed.[2] Tha’ir Hamad claimed in an interview (obtained by unknown means from prison) that the Israelis were armed and that one of them took aim at him but that he shot first. He also claimed that he refrained from harming an Israeli woman and her children, shouting at her in Hebrew and Arabic to leave the area.[3]
    Two of the Israeli civilians killed, Sergei Birmov, 33, and Vadim Balagula, 32, were killed when they stopped their car at the checkpoint, as they made their way to work at a candy factory in Jerusalem.[4]
    The Israelis never succeeded in locating the sniper’s hiding place even after dispatching a helicopter. He had intended to continue shooting but when he fired his 25th bullet the old rifle exploded, making it useless. He was therefore forced to give up and returned to his village. Seven soldiers, two of them officers, and three civilians were killed in the 25-minute attack. Another six Israelis were wounded, four of them seriously.[5]
    The al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the armed wing of the Fatah movement, claimed responsibility for the attack. Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti praised the attack. “Blessed be the fighting hands of the heroes, who dealt these blows to the army of occupation,” he said.[5]
    The Israeli authorities assumed that the shooter was a highly trained marksman from an elite unit, such as Force 17.[2][6] The average Palestinian militant could not be expected to hit 14 people with 25 bullets. Mossad also contacted European and American security agencies to help identify the killer. Mossad suspected that a member of the Irish Republican Army could be responsible for the act.[7] The sniper became a hero among local residents.

    • Replies: @israel shamir
  12. Anon[325] • Disclaimer says:

    The judiciary has not, historically speaking, been used as a weapon against an elected head of state very often. In fact, for most of American history, the judiciary and the president tended to be more often in agreement and not at odds with each other. They came from the same white tribe and had the same background and outlook. The problem is the rise of liberalism, which is convinced it is absolutely right (much like the Pope ex cathedra), and which sees no crime in tearing apart and destroying its own tribe (the white tribe).

    Historically speaking, the divide between liberals and conservatives goes back hundreds of years, each pulling Western culture in one direction or another. They’re part of a Darwinian evolutionary process that directs the steps of a culture towards its continued success, growth, and survival. Think of a culture as a living collective organism, and you’ll get the notion of it. If the majority of people in that culture think they’ll benefit from conservatism, they’ll turn towards the conservatives. If they think they’ll benefit from being more liberal, they’ll turn more liberals. It’s all about self-interest, of one sort or another. If your self-interest is served, you’ll be more likely to survive and reproduce.

    However, when liberalism turned against whites, it became an ideology of defeat and death for its own tribe and culture–but still an ideology that supported growth–but growth for invasive outsiders. When whites started losing economic ground, many whites latched onto liberalism as the cure. But liberal ideology has become like an immune system that no longer works properly to keep the body healthy. It’s now a cancer that’s killing the body. The solutions of liberalism are not going to work for the white tribe and are no longer healthy for it.

    The reason why liberalism has become so virulent is because it has seen its own death staring it in the face. Unless liberalism has the support of outsiders, it is doomed to die inside our own white culture. Because of the massive growth of the world population, it is inevitable that mass world-wide famines will occur in the next few generations and millions of people will storm borders in an attempt to find food and employment. Whites must close their borders and become more conservative to survive the coming apocalypse. This has enraged liberalism, because its sees its ideological death as a permanent one. Unless the entire 3rd world suddenly starts practicing intelligent birth control and controls its growth, liberalism worldwide will become maladaptive for absolutely every culture on the planet as people between those cultures battle each other for dwindling resources, and life becomes more nasty, brutish, and short.

    It’s not an accident that liberalism is most strident and frantic where the friction is the greatest–the coasts. Liberals are terrified that coastal whites will notice that coastal whites are being shoved out of the jobs and housing on the coasts by foreigners, and once that happens, the jig is up for liberalism. Therefore, liberals try to indoctrinate and brainwash coastal whites the most.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  13. Crazy Horse [AKA "Gall"] says:

    “Perhaps, Denis Diderot was right and Man will never be free until the last lawyer is strangled with the entrails of the last banker.”

    Yes well that pretty much sums it up.

    My idea of the American dream was congress walking into the Potomac with a lawyer under each arm.

    America is supposedly a nation of laws. This wouldn’t be so bad if the laws were equally applied. Hilary Clinton is a perfect example. As far as Trump. He lost me when he fired missiles into Syria based on such an obvious false flag and believed Booboo about Iran.

    That said this whole “Impeachment” is a farce like the one against Clinton and I was no big fan of Clinton in fact I was one of the “vast rightwing conspiracy”. This one so obviously run and orchestrated by the deep state which everyone except maybe a few deluded democrats is beginning to hate that it may give him the extra cred he needs to win the election.

    • Replies: @Wally
  14. Anon[409] • Disclaimer says:

    No one cares about your sham State. Its propagandists here, such as Ben Shapiro as one loud example, are too busy trying to obfuscate and tear down our nationalist movement for anyone significant to have an ounce of care beyond revulsion. Those who look into your religion and its stated aims will have more than revulsion. You want to keep those to a minimum. Those who cared were roundly delegitimized with the election of Donald Trump, other than a walking dead Jew with actual money and not merely a twitter account. And who wouldn’t own a meter of property here if this nation had justice. As prior implied, everyone else will ignore your state only if you are lucky. Save your pointless Israeli government history minutia for Jews. Its about as compelling as the “little nation that could” ham-fisted romanticism that the genetically sensual Jews can’t resist.

  15. Alfred says:

    A good source of information about the corruption of justice in the USA is the blog of Martin Armstrong. Here is a sample:

    So What Part of NY Courts R Corrupt You Did Not Understand? | Armstrong Economics

    A Google search: southern district new york
    yields 118 articles like the one above.

    Essentially, in the USA, when the prosecutors have no evidence, they can always accuse an innocent person with “conspiracy”. They lock up such an accused person and negotiate a lesser “crime” to which he confesses in return for “leniency”. This tool can be used to produce “evidence” to charge their real target.

  16. Alfred says:

    The stupidity of him not being able to see how he has been used and what they have done in directing US policy is beyond description

    Did he have any real choice in the matter?

  17. Ghali says:

    B. Netanyahu is a war criminal. In any civilised society, he would be held accountable for his many war crimes. In fact, Netanyahu is the world’s most recognised terrorist today.

    No decent lawyer with the slightest moral responsibility will defend Netanyahu, but there are many scumbags.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  18. teeth [AKA "missinglinx"] says:

    effects of inbreeding on judiciary

  19. And the trail lawyers(AND THE JUDGES) got all of us small business on our knees.

  20. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Last week the Israeli Justice Minister shocked the public. He had revealed the methods used by the judicial establishment against Netanyahu.. .It is threats, extortion and blackmail.

    Don’t know about ‘Stolenland,’ but anyone here in the USA that has been confronted by our legal system will tell you the threats, extortion’s and blackmail is par for the course. A DA will cut any corner, tell any lie and threaten anyone related to the accused to get a conviction, then it’s onto the governor’s house or Congress.

    So Bibi is innocent you say? Wow, what change.

    One would think that getting that kickback money from those German subs or getting some more shekels in the telecommunications giant Bezeq affair or getting a ‘taste’ of the immense amount of money being looted from us Goyim in the Israeli binary options thefts would constitute some kind of fraud, but not in that SLC. BTW, binary options were made VERBOTEN by Israel, but just in Israel. The crooks are still free to con Goyim around the world out of their shekels. Oh, and those illegal donations to that slimy crook from Diaspora Jews! Except Israeli spy Arnon Milchan, who walks free in the USA, even after bragging about stealing some of our nuclear triggers. Even he got tired of being pimped by Nutty for some more ‘gifts.’. Guess it would be crass to mention Bibi’s son Yair, begging his running buddies for some lap dances because his Daddy did so much for their Daddy’s.

    Let’s not forget Bibi’s wife, Sara, who was living like a King on the taxpayer’s dime, which Bibi also enjoyed. The fine wines, the chef made for some luxurious evenings at the Nuttyahoo residence. Thank YWHW that of the \$100,000 Sara stole, she only had to pay back 15K!

    Yes, life is good in Stolenland, as long as your the Khazar invaders and not the indigenous, who Bibi is setting up for another carpet-bombing campaign, to make his bones with the voters to keep him in office and out of prison.

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
  21. “As the world increasingly Judaises…”

    Are you so sure about that, Israel?

    One and a half billion Muslims, one and a third billion Chinese and one point one billion Hindus and several hundred million blacks of Africa aren’t being mislead. Christianity is the only tool by which the world can be turned topsy turvy and for a long time to come, it’s the problem of the West. Now had you mean that the Jews are conquering the world by imposing their mythology on the world at large by virtue of the control of Wall Street, thus everything else, I would believe it.

  22. Netanyahu and Trump and Obama and both Bushs and both Clintons are all war criminals and in the case of the attack on the WTC they could all be considered terrorists, there is no justice in the ZUS!

    • Replies: @Durruti
  23. @Colin Wright

    Whatever the percentage maybe but it ought not be more than their numbers in the society; the largest number of American judges must come from white Christian community to be truly balanced.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Z-man
  24. The founders thoughts on Democracy, and the reasons America was born a Constitutional Republic:

    “The evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. The people do not want virtue, but are the dupes of pretended patriots.” – Elbridge Gerry

    “Democracy, will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes, and no man’s life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure and every one of these will soon mold itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues, and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit, and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few.” – John Adams

    “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” – John Adams

    “A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.” – Benjamin Rush

    “Where a majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an opportunity, the rights of the minor party become insecure.” – James Madison

  25. anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:

    And I like the STYLE.

    Israelis are prompt to gag the publication of whatever the authorities do not like. Only after many years the Israeli people had learned that their authorities stole children from Yemeni Jews, treated Moroccan children skin diseases by X-raying them to death, sterilised Ethiopian women, blew up synagogues in Baghdad, kidnapped the nuclear technician Vanunu in Rome, bombed the USS Liberty and poisoned drinking water in Acre. All these crimes were protected by a gagging order from prying eyes.

    Now the Westerners can read Soviet newspapers.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  26. This is interesting & true in many ways, but I don’t think the historical analogy is quite appropriate. What we know of historical, traditional Judaism, is that judges, sages etc. were effective rulers of Israel (in some period) & Jewish diaspora in Europe & Asia (Babylonia, Iran,..). This was a kind of theocracy for locals, something which empires & states (Cordoba caliphate, Ottoman empire, Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth, Venice, ..) condoned.

    But in the case of the US (and UK, lately, and now Israel) judges are not the source of authority, but the transmission of it. You may name it “deep state” or any other name, but it is a complex of power elites in finances, military, intelligence services, political oligarchies, entrenched powerful families & various other movers & shakers.

    So- who, finally, gives the orders? Judges or financial moguls? Or some other group or individuals? I think it is some internal dynamics at work, not immediately visible.

  27. Wally says:
    @Crazy Horse

    “That said this whole “Impeachment” is a farce like the one against Clinton and I was no big fan of Clinton in fact I was one of the “vast rightwing conspiracy”. ”

    – Yet Clinton did actually lie under oath during the questioning about Jennifer Flowers.

    – No, Clinton’s impeachment was not about a blow job from Monica Lewinsky.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  28. @Colin Wright

    What percentage of the federal judiciary is Jewish?

    Not only that, but listen to this:
    When a judge gets elected in the USA, big-shots Jew lawyers they gather together, they rent a roof garden bar/restaurant in a 7 star hotel and then they invite the Judge and his family to celebrate his election.
    Of course they set a box in the party and each-one drops an envelope with their “contribution” for the Judge’s campaigning expenses.
    So, they eat, they drink, they laugh and they get to KNOW this judge better.

    And I am asking you:
    If one of these Jew lawyers appears before this Judge for ANY CASE, WHO you think will win?
    The Jew lawyer or the other guy?

  29. @Really No Shit

    ‘Whatever the percentage maybe but it ought not be more than their numbers in the society; the largest number of American judges must come from white Christian community to be truly balanced.’

    Well — it’s interesting.

    I don’t think we should allot places by quota: where does it end? How many judgeships for Greek-Americans? Do they have more than their share, less than their share?

    On the one hand, I do think Jews have obtained a disproportionate share of the actual ‘privilege’ going — and not necessarily by simply following the rules. The nonsense that goes on now with Harvard admissions, etc is egregious. Perhaps worse, they’ve subverted our whole political system so that we now serve Israel. We wind up becoming dominated to an absurd extent by the peculiarities, preferences, and agenda of the Jewish American community.

    On the other hand, Jews do tend to be intelligent, driven, and ambitious. It’s entirely to be expected that they would pop up as doctors, judges, social arbiters, etc at more than the two percent or so their numbers dictate.

    This is the quandary I often find myself facing. On the one hand, I think the more flamboyant anti-semitic fantasies are both unfair and wildly overdrawn; just as I would expect there to be fewer black doctors, so I would expect there to be more Jewish doctors.

    On the other hand, I’ve had it with ‘everything is fine, move along.’ No, it’s not fine.

    We refer to ‘white privilege’ — a concept which, since I moved to the white provinces, I’ve come to regard as absurd. These are not privileged folks around here; mighty fine, but decidedly not ‘privileged.’

    There is, however, a phenomenon we can call ‘Jewish privilege.’ That exists. We should discuss it; but by discuss I don’t mean leave the whole subject to be monopolized by, on the one hand, anti-semitic fantasists, and on the other hand, the ADL.

    Global warming offers an analogy. It exists. That doesn’t mean we should start worshipping Greta Thunberg; but neither does it mean we should pretend it’s not there. It exists, and we should rationally decide what to do about it.

    Ditto for what I’ve just labelled ‘Jewish privilege.’

    • Replies: @Antares
  30. Durruti says:
    @Desert Fox

    Netanyahu and Trump and Obama and both Bushs and both Clintons are all war criminals and in the case of the attack on the WTC they could all be considered terrorists, there is no justice in the ZUS!


    There will be no justice until we American Patriots -Restore Our Republic, which was destroyed on November 22, 1963, in a hail of bullets. We lost our Last Constitutional President, John F. Kennedy, and have been on a declining National trajectory ever since.

    The butchery against the Liberty Sailors, the WTC 9/11, as well as the abject shitting upon our People by use of a MOSSAD Shadow Government of Epstein, Maxwells (both of them), Ehud Barak (Zionist Prime Minister who regularly visited his Crew, mostly in the Epstein HQ in NYC), to oversee their work – in Running – Looting our USA – destroying our Industrial Infrastucture and Genociding our once proud Middle Class (working class wage earners), – and by that process, converting our People – into fawning Slaves.

    Terrorism is the least of their crimes. The overpowering of our Elected Republic Government, by force, and propaganda, and the sullying of our finest traditions through their control of the printed and educational Mainstream Media, and the prostituting of our Political Leaders, and Legal Authorities, and the Oppressing our our citizens, (depriving our People of their LIBERTY), are the major crimes they are guilty of, and must Pay For.

    This excellent article by Israel Shamir, opens the wound. The pain is real.

    Regaining our Liberty is the Salve.

    God Bless America!


  31. @Anon

    Dire predictions of overpopulation are beginning to look like that is not the case.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  32. @Wally

    Neither constituted a high crime or misdemeanor.

    Nothing Trump has done qualifies either.

    Nixon was a closer call.

    • Replies: @Wally
  33. @1U

    Please spare us the invitation to read opinions on law andthe judiciary which do not have the elementary basis of study of the law or any acquaintance with judges. (Or were you sentenced by a judge).

    To say that judges in the US “are groveling flunkies of the people with impunity” is such verbal sludge that it doean’t even rise to the level of ambiguity is to compliment your intellect. Let’s say we can extract enough meaning from it to infer that it expresses contempt for the weakness of US judges. Justice Scalia? A grovelling flunky?! Judges are real actual peoplr and you don’t know any.

  34. @Durruti

    We are not just a Republic. We are a Democratic Republic. Big difference. We used to understand that, hence the names of our two political parties.

    For those who would question the democratic part, we still make laws by referendum all over the country. And an argument could be made that our laws by referendum are much better for the people as a whole than the laws made by our representatives.

    Unfortunately federal law can not be made by referendum, except with respect to amending the Constitution and even then states can decide how to vote for an amendment.

    But referendums are alive and well as a means of making law in every state.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  35. Antares says:
    @Colin Wright

    On the other hand, Jews do tend to be intelligent, driven, and ambitious.

    The ‘intelligent’ part of that statement has never been proven. In my opinion it is completely untrue. What we are able to build up they can only destroy. Their specialities are: hacking, stealing, lying, pretending, persuasion and group think, coated with the murder of unarmed civilians and the undermining of our societies.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Alden
  36. @Durruti

    I don’t know if you have read these books but they reveal the zionist control of ,America, JFK, the CIA and Vietnam, and The Secret Team by Col. L. Fletcher Prouty and see his videos on youtube, Blood in the Water by Joan Mellen, and Remember the Liberty by Phillip Nelson, both of these books have contributions by the Liberty survivors and both reveal that it was a joint attack on the USS Liberty by the Israelis and the ZUS.

    The CIA and the Mossad are one in the same, so intertwined as to be identical twins, and this is revealed in the book By Way of Deception by ex mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky.

    The greatest threat to America is zionism!

    • Replies: @Durruti
    , @bjondo
  37. Skeptikal says:
    @Alf alpha

    Gee, your post would make more sense if you didn’t use so many initialisms. Everyone knows was CIA stands for.

    But, DCI? NDA? RBG?

  38. Skeptikal says:

    “undermines the values and purpose of the Jewish State.”

    Fine with me!!

  39. The funny thing is these lawyers could have all the authority and power they wanted, and no one would care so long as they actually saw some benefits from time to time. It always amazes me when pundits or “journalists” cry and complain about populism. Imagine openly saying you are against what is popular, and then turning around and having the gall to say you are promoting democracy and human rights. The only thing that makes sense when looking at the broader picture, is that the “elites” that run the world actually hate the people they rule over, because history has shown us this repeated pattern.

  40. @Patrikios Stetsonis

    ‘Not only that, but listen to this:
    When a judge gets elected in the USA, big-shots Jew lawyers they gather together…’

    But you say this as if any other ethnic group would not behave similarly.

    This tends to be where I part company with the more unhesitatingly anti-semitic; I don’t see Jews doing anything innumerable other groups don’t do also. Back in my trucking days, there was one warehouse in San Francisco where it was impossible for anyone who wasn’t a Samoan to get a job.

    It’s just that Jews are better at it, and the effects have become seriously pernicious.

    You may remember when you were in second grade. Was there a kid who always knew the answer first, and would start demanding to be called on?

    Eventually, the teacher just had to tell him to shut up. She wanted everyone else in the class to participate as well. The situation wasn’t really anyone’s fault — least of all the sharp kid’s.

    It just had to be dealt with. In the second grade classroom, it was relatively easy. In America as of 2019, it becomes a bit of a quandary.

  41. anarchyst says:

    You are correct.

    The one reason that makes “jews” so successful is that they formulate and enact laws (civil-rights for some) that deny us whites the right to look after our own self-interest while they flout the laws that are imposed on the rest of us.
    THAT, my friends is a reason for their “success”.

    A good example of jewish flouting of “civil-rights” laws is the jewish community of Kiryas Joel, New York, among others. If you are not jewish, you cannot buy property there, nor can you send your non-jewish children to the (jews-only) “public” schools, despite so-called “civil-rights” laws enacted to prohibit discrimination in housing and education.

    Not only that, but most of the jews who occupy Kiryas Joel and other “jews only” communities also take advantage of “social services” and “welfare” programs out of proportion to their numbers. Almost every jew in these “jews-only” communities is running some kind of “scam” on the American “social welfare system”.

    You see, “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is the jewish mantra and is the primary way that they destroy cultures and civilizations. Their lack of morality figures heavily into their success. Jews think nothing of screwing over a “goy”; it is just “normal business” for them…

    Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.

    This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.

    Let’s not forget the jewish practice of “male genital mutilation”-circumcision.

    Performed on the eighth day of a jewish male’s life, this barbaric practice can be linked to mental illness prevalent in jews in later life.

    The dirty “mohel” that performs the “deed” then proceeds to fellate the baby after the “deed” is done.

    This, in itself is one way to introduce STDs and other nasty diseases from the “mohel” to the infant.

    This could be a reason why so many jews are “twisted”, as many STDs do not manifest symptoms until later in life.

    Attempts to outlaw “male genital mutilation” and the subsequent fellatio of the infant has been met with stern resistance from every jewish group.

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.

    This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.

    As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.

    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.

    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.

    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.

    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    • Replies: @Geowizz
  42. @Durruti

    Here’s your “Mr Constitution” in action, you know, the drug addled skirt chaser everyone here worships as if he were God himself.

    Did You Know a Law Is On The Books to Disarm All Americans?
    Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, provides an impetus to not only ban civilian firearm ownership but to also transfer control of the U.S. military to the United Nations.

    “It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law states.

    • Replies: @Durruti
    , @Milton
  43. pyrrhus says:
    @Colin Wright

    A hell of a lot more than 2%….

  44. @davidgmillsatty

    Actually, we are supposed to be a Constitutional Republic.

    What I did not know was NONE of the men we consider to be the principle founders of the American Republic EVER used the term Democratic-Republic to describe the form of government they created under the United States Constitution.

  45. @Colin Wright

    Each ethnic group mind their own business.
    If now some of these groups copy the Jewish diabolical tactics it is their problem.
    But think about this.
    Have a newly elected Judge been invited by some big-shot Jews to a meeting and decline their invitation. They will get rid of him in the first opportunity. Especially if the Judge is not a Jew.
    Remember what happen with Judge Brett Kavanaugh?
    You think it was a ….rape case over 35 years? Behind that bitch was the Jews and their co-conspirators.

  46. Z-man says:
    @Really No Shit

    The Supremes has 3 full fledged Jooz with Ginsberg being the most virulent and one quasi one, Sotomayor who is officially Puerto Rican but is in all sense a Joo. In the Congress at least 15% of the Senate is racially Jew-ish and about the same in in The House. But a solid 70% of both houses are completley owned by the Tribe.
    Something’s gotta give.

  47. Z-man says:

    The Right Wing main stream media, especially OAN* harp on Iran being the ‘greatest state sponsor of terrorism’. I thing the Zionist Entity is numero uno.
    One sweet dream I have is that Bibi really pisses somebody off and then a stray cruise missle lands on his lap, kaboom! Ah, one can dream.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  48. Durruti says:
    @Desert Fox

    The greatest threat to America is zionism!

    We are beyond “threat.” The damage has been done. We are murdered, robbed-looted, deprived of our Liberty & Lives. Our Country, our last Constitutional President, our Republic, our Very Constitution, our dignity, our Sovereignty, & Honor, have all been Assassinated by the Zionist Oligarch Bankers & their Tribal accomplices.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  49. Durruti says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    Here’s your “Mr Constitution” in action, you know, the drug addled skirt chaser everyone here worships as if he were God himself.

    This man you label “drug addled skirt chaser,”

    By The numbers:

    1. Was our last Constitutional President.

    2. Was Assassinated with Bullets.

    3. Was a War Hero. Books on his heroism exist.

    4. His Back injury was caused by a Japanese Destroyer slicing his PT Boat in half, and injuring in the process him and several members of his crew. A back injury hurts.

    5. He managed to rescue his crew.

    6. Ignoring his injury, John Kennedy served on active duty for the rest of the war.

    7. JFK placed the FBI & our CIA under our elected government Control (where they should be), as Dulles & Hoover can attest to. JFK actually dismissed Dulles. When asked why he placed his brother Robert Kennedy as the Attorney General, JFK responded, & I paraphrase, Because I can trust him.

    8. In 1960, President JFK inherited the imperialist & Cold War Establishment – – Pay attention here… and set about changing it.

    A. Kennedy inherited the Eisenhower Administration Bay of Pigs (Playa Jirón), assault plan against Cuba. He refused to support it further with direct American military intervention.

    B. Kennedy inherited the Truman/Eisenhower colonialist policy against Vietnam, and began to close it down.

    C. Kennedy forced American Steel companies to rescind their price increase (they had promised not to make). Understand, our last Constitutional, Patriotic President, JFK, would not have tolerated a NAFTA and other Zioinist assaults on America’s Industrial Foundation. He defended American Workers – with his life.

    Zionist ‘historians’ object to J F Kennedy, in great part because he was a Fine American Man.

    You appear to have a Bug in your bonnet against John F. Kennedy (from repeated attacks against JFK by you on this website).

    JFK, and our Democratic Republic were Assassinated – in a hail of bulllets. Surely you note that action as a Crime Against all Americans.

    God Bless John F. Kennedy.

    What will we do for our Country?


    *This comment is too long (but UNZ won’t print my articles). Consider it a Christmas present.

  50. How is Public Law 87-297 in any way constitutional?
    Truth is seldom pretty or polite…

  51. Lol says:

    I suppose the Allies should pay restitution to the people murdered after the Nuremberg trials then. After all, Israel’s war criminality merits the trying of their politicians far more than corruption.

  52. Z-man says:

    * OAN is a good source of news and sometimes even shows, maybe inadvertently or maybe not, the Zionist Entity in a less than positive light but it has to bow down to the Tribe on a regular basis.

  53. Wally says:

    – Wrong.
    Clinton’s lying under oath in the Jennifer Flowers sexual harassment investigation certainly did constitute a high crime.

    – I agree, they have nothing on Trump.

    • Replies: @anon
  54. sally says:
    @Colin Wright

    If ever there were to be a rebellion in America; who do you think is the mostly likely target?(pick one):
    Zionist Judges ( ) Muslim Journalist ( ) Muslim Generals ( )
    Muslim Judges ( ) Jewish Journalist ( ) Jewish Generals ( )
    Jewish Judges ( ) Zionist Journalist ( ) Zionist Generals ( )


    Muslim Bankers ( ) Jewish Doctors ( ) Zionist CEOs ( )
    Zionist Bankers ( ) Muslim Doctors ( ) Jewish CEOs ( )
    Jewish Bankers ( ) Zionist Doctors ( ) Muslim CEOs ( )

    Zionist Bureaucrats ( ) Jewish diplomats ( ) Zionist Intel Officer ( )
    Muslim Bureaucrats ( ) Zionist Diplomats ( ) Jewish Intel Officer ( )
    Jewish Bureaucrats ( ) Muslim Diplomats ( ) Muslim Intel Officer ( )

    Jewish Educators ( ) Jewish Undertakers ( ) Jewish gangsters ( )
    Zionist Educators ( ) Zionist Undertakers ( ) Zionist gangsters ( )
    Muslim Educators ( ) Muslim Undertakers ( ) Muslim gangsters ( )

    Zionist heads of state, ( ) Zionist Congresspersons ( ) Jewish stock brokers ( )
    Jewish Heads of state, ( ) Muslim Congresspersons ( ) Muslim stock brokers ( )
    Muslim heads of state, ( ) Jewish Congresspersons ( ) Zionist stock brokers ( )

    Jewish Car Dealership Owners ( ) Muslim Lawyers ( ) Zionist Home Builders ( )
    Muslim Car Dealership Owners ( ) Zionist Lawyers ( ) Jewish Home Builders ( )
    Zionist Car Dealership Owners ( ) Jewish Lawyers ( ) Muslim Home Builders ( )

    Zionist Contractors ( ) Jewish Women ( ) Zionist Mayors ( )
    Muslim Contractors ( ) Muslim Women ( ) Muslim Mayors ( )
    Jewish Contractors ( ) Zionist Women ( ) Jewish Mayors ( )

    Jewish Oil and Gas suppliers ( ) Muslim Airplane Developers and Suppliers ( )
    Muslim Oil and Gas suppliers ( ) Jewish Airplane Developers and Suppliers ( )
    Zionist Oil and Gas suppliers ( ) Zionist Airplane Developers and Suppliers ( )

    Jewish electric Power Franchise owners ( ) Zionist Patent office examiners ( )
    Muslim electric Power Franchise owners ( ) Jewish Patent office examiners ( )
    Zionist electric Power Franchise owners ( ) Muslim Patent office examiners ( )

    Jewish Engineers ( ) Muslim Sports Franchise owners ( ) Jewish Librarians ( )
    Muslim Engineers ( Jewish Sports Franchise owners ( ) Zionist Librarians ( )
    Zionist Engineers ( ) Zionist Sports Franchise owners ( ) Muslim Librarians ( )

    or check here if you think the MSM will direct the rebellion to be against the USA ()

  55. Israel is illegal and evil. And for what? a lousy piece of desert. They will never get Jews from LA, Florida or New York, or London, or France, or anywhere else to move there. Who with a brain would prefer to live in the desert? The Palestinians are just as stupid. Why not move to a nicer location?

  56. @renfro

    The stupidity of him not being able to see how he has been used and what they have done in directing US policy is beyond description.

    In Trump’s universe, everything evolves around his gargantuan ego.

    The rest of said vastness, the tufted Orange Cockatoo refers to as nuisance space rocks, the ones the dinosaurs revere as the ‘deity‘ that set them free…

    Go figure [skating]…

  57. Denis Diderot was right and Man will never be free until the last lawyer is strangled with the entrails of the last banker.

    That’s not what Diderot said or wrote (in fact he didn’t write the aphorism you’re thinking of, either – which is usually referenced to ‘Dithyrambe sur la fête des Rois‘ which is a non-existent piece of text).

    I liked it so much that I reframed it (in about 2008) to update it to reference our new rulers and their lapdogs: “Man will be free when the last politician is bludgeoned to death with the severed arm of the last police sniper“… a tad unwieldy, but gives the right flavour (priests are irrelevant nowadays).

    The actual underlying quotation is from Jean Meslier, and it’s

    Je voudrais, et ce sera le dernier et le plus ardent de mes souhaits, je voudrais que le dernier des rois fût étranglé avec les boyaux du dernier prêtre.

    “I would like – and this will be the last and the most ardent of my wishes – I would like the last of the kings to be strangled with the gizzards of the last priest“.

    Diderot’s closest effort was pretty good (in the Eleutheromanes) –

    S’il osait de son cœur n’écouter que la voix
    Je ne veux ni donner ni recevoir de lois.
    Et ses mains ourdiraient les entrailles du prêtre,
    Au défaut d’un cordon pour étrangler les rois.

    If [mankind] dared to listen to his heart…
    [snip] [he would say]
    ‘I don’t want to rule or to serve.’
    And his hands would plait the entrails of the priest,
    for want of a rope with which to strangle kings

    “I don’t want to give or receive laws” is the literal translation of “je ne veux ni donner ni recevoir de lois“, but in this context it kind of means what I’ve used

  58. @davidgmillsatty

    Some time ago iSteve was seized by a mild panic based on UN population projections, and I made it very clear that there was nothing to worry about because the projections were wrong … because UN demographers are fucking hopeless.

    It’s absolutely obvious that they used a logistic curve to forecast African (and other) TFR: they paramaterised the function wrong, making it slow down too late, and to decelerate too slowly.

    TFRs across Africa are falling quite rapidly – precisely as should be expected ~2 generations after the end of colonialism (the transitional phase is always very very messy).

    The next step-change will be a plummeting of African TFRs as their median supernumerary (above-subsistence) income becomes sufficiently established that it affects their expectations. A halving of TFR in 10-15 years will be about right (as happened in Asia in the 1970s-1990s).

    The world is emptying – which is a brilliant thing. The only people who wish it wasn’t so, are unproductive parasites who need a large herd to fleece (politicians, religious leaders, bureaucrats). Hopefully someone can use CRISPR to design a pathogen that targets bureaucratic and political DNA.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  59. @Kratoklastes

    Oh, forgot to mention: TFR in Sub-Saharan Africa had fallen 25% from its peak between 1980 and 2015.

    By the time TFR starts to accelerate downwards it will be starting from something around 4-4.2. By the time the fall stops, they – like everyone else – will be reproducing below replacement.

    This paper’s reasonably typical of the awful level of competency in demography – On the Pace of Fertility DEcline in Dub-Saharan Africa.

    Comparing how different regions’ TFR unfolded in different historical periods is basically the same as assuming that the only thing that matters is ‘T’ (the time subscript) – however”Y – Ymin” (income above subsistence) is a far far better explanatory variable.

  60. Milton says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    “The battle for American freedom was begun by the thousands of farmers and tradesmen who made up the Minute Men – citizens who were ready to defend their liberty at a moment’s notice. Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom. The cause of liberty, the cause of American, cannot succeed with any lesser effort.” – JFK

    Try again, Jehoram Walker Read.

    JFK was the real deal and America’s last genuine Chief Executive. Every President since JFK has been an emasculated, effeminate puppet-President who answers to the Freemason-run Deep State (answering to Zion).

    Trump was exposed as a Deep-State cuck the minute he refused to declassify the remaining sealed JFK Assassination records in October, 2017.

    • Agree: Durruti
  61. bjondo says:
    @Desert Fox

    Peter Hounam similar to Mellen. Not familiar with Nelson.

    I don’t buy “joint attack” by Israel and US.

    Israel attacked with LBJ (and Adm McCain) covering up the crime.
    The Jew gang surrounding and manipulating
    the strongly Jew/Jew leaning LBJ are as American
    as Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Chertoff, ilk.
    They are Jew and Israeli NOT American.

    Like 9-11, this was an Israeli and infiltrated Jew crime
    with traitor dogs obediently performing.


  62. AWM says:

    What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 100?
    “Your Honor”

    What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 50?

  63. Moi says:
    @Colin Wright

    Don’t know about that, but I used to go to the Justice Department (sic) quite a lot, and walking the hallways it seemed that just about every third name on office doors was Jewish.

  64. @bjondo

    Read the books and you will be convinced!

    • Replies: @bjondo
  65. @bjondo

    Israel started it , LBJ tried to finish it. End of Story, exactly the way the survivors tell it.

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @Desert Fox
  66. @Milton

    Again, more misdirection and propaganda. And again someone who will not address Public Law 87-297 Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy on September 26, 1961, which provides an impetus to not only ban civilian firearm ownership but to also transfer control of the U.S. military to the United Nations.

    Yes, Kennedy made all kinds of wonderful, pie in the sky speeches. That’s what politician’s do. What matters is what they do, not what they say . As my dear old granny used to say, “the proof is n the pudding”

    Trip To NYC: Bill Signing-HR 9118 Public Law 87-297, Arms Control and Disarmament Act.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  67. @Johnny Walker Read

    Act of September 26, 1961 (Arms Control and Disarmament Act), Public Law 87-297, 75 STAT 631, which established the United States Arms and Control and Disarmament Agency. FULL COPY. This basically put America under the control of the UN.

  68. @Milton

    You want a record of Kennedy’s time in the White House, this is where you go. I suggest you read Vietnam, August–December 1963 which discusses the coup against the Diem government.
    I hope you have a lot of time, as there is a great amount of info here.

  69. bjondo says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    Yes, Israel planned, carried out the assault.

    LBJ covered for Israel.

    Unable to hear video. Thanks anyway.

    What does “End of Story” mean?

    What does “LBJ tried to finish it” mean?

    Ennes and others (Larry Weaver) do not say “joint attack”.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  70. bjondo says:
    @Desert Fox

    I’ve read Ennes, Hounam and Mellen.

    If memory is worth anything, Ennes does not mention a “joint attack/operation”.
    Maybe his book too soon for full evidence?

    I think making LBJ/USA co-conspirator is desperate attempt
    to remove full blame from Israel.

    First it was an “error” now a “joint attack”.

    This is just Jew having someone else take blame.

    Jew saving Jew.

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
  71. @bjondo

    If you read Blood in the Water and Remember the Liberty, read both books, and they both prove that LBJ and zionists in his administration planned the attack with Israel and the submarine USS Amberjack fired the torpedo that hit the USS Liberty and was supposed to be the kill shot to finish the Liberty off.

    I have both books and they need to be read to understand the treachery of LBJ and the zionists in the administration and Israel.

    These two books are shocking, and I hope LBJ is frying in hell with all who participated in this diabolical demonic satanic attack.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
  72. @bjondo

    What does “LBJ tried to finish it” mean?

    When Johnson heard about the attack, and found out Israel did not succeed in sinking the Liberty, he ordered the Amberjack(a US submarine)to torpedo the Liberty and “send that G-d damn ship to the bottom of the ocean”. It is said he gave this order because he did not want Israel embarrassed.

    The Israeli gunboats which fired all of their torpedo’s were French made and were not very accurate. Not one Israeli torpedo stuck the Liberty(although they came very close). They returned to base at a high rate of speed to re-arm. There was then a lull in the action before the Liberty was torpedoed, and not one Israeli torpedo boat was anywhere around. The torpedo could have only come from the Amberjack.

    This is very rough transcription of Larry Weavers testimony from the above video and in no way does his story justice. I hope you will find a means to view the video.

    What does “End of Story” mean? Johnson is guilty as charged, end of story.

  73. @Johnny Walker Read

    One more tidbit on Larry’s testimony. There were three Russian ships in the area, and one of those ships offered assistance to the Liberty before before any American ships arrived. The captain of the Liberty politely refused help, probably not wanting any of Americas spy tech to fall into Soviet hands.

  74. @Desert Fox

    TruNews is coming out with a Doc on the USS Liberty. It will be interesting to see if they will tell the “whole truth”.

  75. anon[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @israel shamir

    Can I be nasty to you to you and good to him or your neighbor ?
    I doubt . One can’t compartmentalize one sins , hatred, corruption, violent ways of solving problem .
    Israel will shred itself by doing to itself what it has been to other .

  76. anon[312] • Disclaimer says:

    Again it is nothing but wording of law – Under Oath .
    Why does oath get to decide which violation of law shall be prosecuted ? Violation of oath as a crime should be decriminalized.

    People lie for thousands reasons . If they are not related to the crime at hand , lies should be ignored .

    Do people get impeached for breaking or not honoring the promises made while being sworn in ? That is being done not to even to escape punishment . That promises , with bible beside and swearing under godly oath have or should have more power than the promises made under duress under the oath in a court of law

  77. anon[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    The not-so-secret life of Mathilde Krim

    Sex with Krim was worth the losses of lives. Johnson loved to be adored by Zionist and sought various other gratifications from them . They helped him recover from scandals in Texas .
    Epstein was not around then but the idea was .
    Abe Fortas did his part by judicial prostitutions at thousand levels .

  78. Alden says:
    @Patrikios Stetsonis

    They do more than that. They spot and encourage promising attorneys to run for county judge and lobby the governor to appoint their chosen surrogates.

  79. Alden says:

    Half the girls in my high school were Jews. They weren’t any more intelligent than the non Jews.
    SAT ACT scores proved that. I’ve been around jews all my life. They’re not more intelligent than the goyim. Except for one thing. They tend to be much more naive and credulous about liberal propaganda than the goyim.

    They will believe anything if it’s presented as a progressive liberal cause.

    There aren’t many Jewish Drs left, especially men. It’s partly affirmative action for Asians and partly that 13 years of expensive schooling and training money spent and time wasted their life long earnings are low compared to 60 years ago when college was cheap.

    Much easier to make money in finance real estate politics and lawfare

  80. Alden says:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    I never heard about the torpedo from the Amberjack. The story gets worse and worse.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS