The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIsrael Shamir Archive
Moscow Snowbound, Litvinenko Poisoned, and the Syrian War
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

TOP NEWS: Feeling Pinch of Oil Collapse, Some Russians Take to Streets, reported The New York Times. Indeed, at that time thousands of Russians were queuing in Central Moscow. The enormous line snaked around in the park, despite frost and snow. People stood three and four hours, braving winter weather: old ladies in furs and gentlemen in greatcoats, young people in anoraks, all sort of Russians from Moscow and from provinces. Do you think they were queueing for a fire sale to buy discount products or to change their depreciating roubles for dollars or whatever these desperate people were supposed to desire? Nope. This was the queue for the retrospective exhibition of Valentin Serov’s paintings, a Russian fin-de-siècle painter, in the New Tretyakov Gallery.

Valentin Serov (1865-1911) is a Russian equivalent of Edgar Degas or Edouard Manet or perhaps of James McNeill Whistler, hardly the names to steer Western masses from midwinter slumber. His art is figurative, embedded in Russian classical tradition yet aware of new trends of his time – he was an Art Nouveau founder – but still impeccably humane. Serov is a very Russian painter of the kind despised by the modern conceptual connoisseurs of art who prefer a Warhol’s tin, a Hirst’s shark or a Pussy Riot’s scream. The queue was not a fruit of a successful spin campaign – this was quite a low profile operation. Rather, it was a manifestation of the unpredictable Russian revolt against the Brave New World, on a par with Russians’ rejection of the gender politics, their open celebration of their Christian religiosity and their disapproval of migration, legal and illegal.

They can’t understand why the Germans invite Syrians, why the US judge sentences a woman to years of jail for sex with 17-year old boy, why officials have to officiate at gay marriages, why people must hide their crosses. The whole modern setup of the West annoys them as much as it perhaps annoys you.

En masse, Russians are traditional in their attitudes; and their country drifts further away from the Atlantic consensus under the sanctions. The pro-Western Russians, a.k.a. “liberals” (the term is quite misleading as they admire Pinochet and Thatcher, NATO and Israel) are flabbergasted by their fellow countrymen’s backward preferences. For them, Serov is a low-brow painter for rednecks; Tretyakov Gallery is too demotic. The Moscow Jewish Museum of Tolerance is their preferred exhibition venue. In a typical response, a prominent “liberal” artist and journalist Xenia Larina wrote that the only line she liked was the one for the just opened McDonald’s in Moscow 1990 “as this symbolised our admittance to the civilised world”, in her words. Putin visited the retrospective, thus sealing its fate in the “liberals” eyes, as he can’t do anything right in their view. “This is the 86% queueing,” they say, referring to the high rating of the president.

Probably this is not the way the Russians were supposed to take to the streets, according to The New York Times, but they are unpredictable. It is not that they do not feel the pinch of oil prices falling and rouble going down. They do, and they complain about prices of vegetables, but meanwhile they take it in their stride.

Jews back to Russia?

One of the best and most famous paintings of Valentin Serov did not make it to the retrospective. The Abduction of Europa has been abducted and carried away to Europe. For decades, it was presented in the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow, but in roaring Nineties, a Jewish oligarch Vyacheslav Moshe Kantor managed to get his hands on it and carry it abroad. This was a small thing for him: he managed to get hold of a sizeable bit of Russian industry, as well. Now, he lives in Switzerland and fights the anti-Semitism(!) he so much increased. He has even his own European Jewish Congress – such grand-names-but-few-members bodies are established by every self-respected Jewish oligarch.

He did not return the painting, nor did he loan it to the exhibition to be shown, but he himself made his way to Moscow, to Putin. He complained about European anti-Semitism, and VVP invited European Jews to migrate to Russia, to escape Hitlerite hordes prowling on Champs-Élysées.

Many European Jews moved to Russia in 1930s, among them Menachem Begin, the Israeli Prime Minister, and my father. They escaped Hitler, and found a safe refuge in the Soviet Russia. So the idea is not that crazy as it sounds. In a private conversation, Putin promised Netanyahu to accept Israeli refugees if the things will go badly for the Zionist state.

However, this is quite unlikely eventuality. Meanwhile, the Jews are not endangered anywhere, though they are a source of danger for their neighbours in Palestine. European Jews are doing fine, despite Israeli attempts to scare them into Aliyah, immigration to Israel.

Putin does such odd meetings and declarations as he really wants to be friends with Jews. The problem is, he meets the wrong Jews. Moshe Kantor is the least popular Jewish oligarch, greatly disliked by Jews of all walks of life. There is no positive publicity in such encounters.

Putin has even less success with Russian Jews. The Russian Jewish community practically disappeared in Soviet days. There are descendants of Jews, but no community. Putin thought he needs one, so he invited the Chabad Hassids to organise the communities. They came from New York and from Europe and began to create Jewish communities. They know how to do it: a lot of modern Jewish communities all over the world are new creations of Chabad.


The Hassids made a lot of successful real estate deals. Now the Jewish communities of Russia are very rich and prosperous; they own vast tracts of expensive land. Just in Moscow they have over thirty synagogues and communal centres, the biggest Jewish museum in the world, and a new centre in Moscow’s Beverley Hills, Rublevka. They lack just one thing: they have no Russian Jews. They all gone to Israel, or abandoned the faith of their fathers.

This does not stop the Chabad Hassids from building more synagogues and importing more and more pious Jews from abroad. They carry out their missionary activity, trying to bring descendants of Jews back to faith, in the meantime enriching themselves. They are politically neutral; they never speak against Putin. They present photo ops, sitting around him in their fedoras. Who knows, perhaps in some fifty years they will rebuild the Russian Jewish community. Meanwhile it seems an exercise in futility, at best.

Completely outside this artificially constructed community, there are very active political Jews, doing usual Jewish things: public relations, banking, finances, television. Some of them are Putin-friendly, even sycophantic towards the President. If you ever watch a truly obsequious till nausea film on Putin, chances are it is a Jewish production. On the other hand, other descendants of Jews are active in the opposition, both on the left and on the right. None of them needs the Chabad-created communities.


I was contacted by Israeli Army Radio, as a Hebrew-speaking journalist in Moscow. What do I think about British justice accusing Vladimir Putin personally of Litvinenko’s murder? What do people of Moscow think of their President being a murderer?

People of Moscow do not believe the story, said I. Putin kills nobody, at least since he became President. Litvinenko was a very minor figure, an FSB (Russian FBI) operative dealing with organised crime in a provincial city, until his defection. He was not likely to have access to any of Putin’s dark secrets, provided they exist. His accusations were previously vented, and none of the accusers have yet succumbed. For this reason, the Russians do not take the British allegations seriously.

Thank you, that will be all, the radio anchor person hastily stopped me. Would you know of a Hebrew-speaking person in Moscow with a different point of view? Of somebody who is sure Putin bumped him off?..

I will never become a successful foreign journalist, alas. I always say and write what I think and what I see, independently of what the editors want. In the long gone 1990, during my previous stint in Moscow, I was asked whether Jewish pogroms are coming anytime soon. In my reports, I denied that, though my writing brethren from the Newsweek and the Times duly filed storm warnings. I did not observe anything of this sort. The only danger for a Jew in Russia in 1990 was in over-consumption, as that was the time when all the Jewish oligarchs came to prominence.

Alas, such observation was not conductive to a good career in Russia reporting. Successful foreign journalists in Moscow were always doomsayers, like the infamous Luke Harding who reported of the bloody KGB rule and mafia state, and he has been promoted to the very top of his profession. But I’d rather stick to truth, in the interests of my readers.

Coming back to Litvinenko, the Russians are not in the world league for political assassinations. President Obama kills more political enemies by his drones in a month than the Russians do in their lifetime. Israeli leaders lead the league: they kill every political figure that does not take their orders. Perhaps you remember Khaled Mashaal assassination attempt in 1997 that ended with a huge fiasco? Mossad agents posing as Canadian tourists sprayed poison into his ear, in the Shakespearean fashion, but were caught red-handed. In 2004, they allegedly poisoned Yasser Arafat by the same radioactive substance Litvinenko was supposedly killed with.

For this reason, some people in the Russian-Jewish circles subscribed killing of Litvinenko to his erstwhile patron, the demonic billionaire Mr Berezovsky. He had the reasons, and he had the means, as he had first class access to Mossad killing tools.

Still, no British judge ever attempted to censure an Israeli Prime Minister for an assassination, or for kidnapping, like when Mordechai Vanunu was kidnapped under orders of Mr Shimon Peres.

Anyway Mr Litvinenko’s ghost does not disturb the Muscovites’ beauty sleep: he was not a figure people were aware of, even when he was alive.

Syrian War

The Syrian war is going well. So many things could go wrong, but meanwhile the Russian army is happy, and relations with the Syrians are next to perfect. The army is happy because they have an opportunity to use all their bright new toys. The spirit of the expeditionary force is high. The Syrian climate is much better than central Russia; there are many pretty Syrian girls who are friendly with Russian pilots and marines. Latakia is peaceful; restaurants are open. They even plan to bring the famed Russian circus to cheer the troops. Damascus is peaceful, too. In central Damascus you are lulled into a false feeling of security. You may forget about the war but for intermittent sounds of explosions from far away.

The real warfare is concentrated around the Azaz corridor, a narrow strip of land connecting Turkey to the rebel forces in Aleppo. Though it has been narrowed down to four miles in some places, the Syrian [government] Army can’t take it, despite the Russian aerial support. For the success of the whole operation, it is paramount to seize the corridor and cut the supply lines, but there is a heavy political flak and military difficulties.

At the last Lavrov-Kerry meeting, the American State Secretary six times implored his Russian counterpart to keep hands off the Azaz corridor. The Americans do not want to see Russian victory; besides, the Turks threaten to invade if the corridor is blocked. The Kurds could help the Army cut the corridor, but they do not rush to enter such a bloody and dangerous confrontation. They prefer to sit tight and wait for somebody else to do the job.


The Kurds are afraid of the Turks just across the border and do not want to upset them too much. They do not feel they have much to gain from President Assad’s victory. Syrian Christians told me the Kurds go into their territory and shoot at the Daesh forces, thus causing Daesh’s ferocious retort to the Christians. This is the sectarian reality of Syria, where only the Syrian Army fights for the whole country.

The threats and requests would not stay the advance of the Army, but taking the Azaz corridor is a formidable task anyway. The rebels are dug in; the Islamists use suicide bombers to stem the army offensive. They created deeply entrenched defensive lines and the Russian-Syrian coalition forces advance very slowly, if at all.

The Russians say that the Syrian soldiers are tired, and they do not want to fight hard. The Syrian Mukhabarat (Intelligence Services), a very important independent player, believe that Russia and Iran are committed to preserving Syria, so let them fight. This attitude seeps into the Syrian army. They, like the Kurds, prefer to sit tight and wait. Young men in danger of being drafted prefer to go to Germany or Sweden – this is the first war in history where such an option exists.

In some places the Russian specnaz (airborne, special troops and marines) dislodged the rebels, took their positions and transferred them to the Syrian Army, but the army failed to hold the positions and retreated at the first enemy shelling.

An Iranian brigade made a try and suffered very heavy losses. Some Iranian units were decimated, and since then the Iranians prefer to act as military advisers. They still have many casualties, including high-ranking ones. Iran spends some ten billion dollar a year on Syrian war, according to some sources.

The Russian ground forces are estimated at some two thousand soldiers and officers; they are needed for the defense of the Latakia area. It seems that the Russians and Iranians would have to bring more troops to win the war, but meanwhile it is not going to happen.

The Russian bombing campaign has been successful in one way: it convinced many rebel units to sue for peace. Before the bombs, they were all against any dealing with Assad government; now, they are for settling the conflict peacefully. As I wrote in my previous reports, the real purpose of Russian aerial operations is to force a peaceful solution on the rebels. Well, on some rebels, as the Daesh and an-Nusra appear quite immune to persuasion.

The Russians and the Americans do not fight Daesh too much, as if they are afraid to destroy the force they used to justify their involvement. The Syrian army attempts to advance in Palmyra were repelled by Daesh. The Daesh counteroffensive in Deir al Zour has been accompanied by a mass slaughter of civilians; the army stopped it but could not advance. So the political solution seems to be imperative for conclusion of the war.

Dealing with the armed opposition goes on two levels: local and international. Locally, Russian commissars meet with local rebel commanders and try to convince them to switch sides. Internationally, Russian diplomats argue with their counterparts from the US, Germany, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia about the agenda and personalities for the forthcoming conference.

I have met with a Russian representative who concluded his tour of duty meeting the rebel commanders. He told me that the rebels trust Bashar Assad but do not trust his officers and intelligence agents. There is much bad blood between the rebels and the Army officers. The rebels ask for Russian intermediaries and even for Russian officers to accompany them. Otherwise, they say, Assad forces will renege on promises. They often ask for money to change their allegiance. It seems that (aside from the Islamist fanatics) the rebels look for a way out of the war.

On the international level, there is hard bargaining between Russia and the rest. Moscow is a hub for negotiations: all Middle Eastern rulers and European high-ranking diplomats visited Moscow recently to discuss Syria.

Among them, there was the Emir of Qatar, who was very polite and gentle with the Russian president. He promised to attend to Russian interests in Syria. Putin presented him a fine falcon, but did not give in on his support of Assad.

There were more rumours of Russians demanding that Assad retire. These rumours usually appear in Russian opposition newspapers. From what I learned from Russian high-ranking personalities, these are just rumours created to saw distrust between the Russians and the Syrians. Russia stands by Assad, at least until the Syrian people will elect another ruler.

The conference on Syria was supposed to get together on January 25; at writing of these lines, it did not convene yet. It is not clear who will come. The Turks object to the Kurdish presence, Saudis reject some Moscow-approved persons, the US basically supports the Saudi list.

The greatest chance for peace lies in exhaustion. The Syrians are tired of war, and the Russian involvement convinced the rebels they can not win. Now they are trying to make a deal, but this is also a time-consuming operation.

However, until now the Russians have no reason to regret their decision to save Bashar Assad. Syria is more fun than the Eastern Ukraine, and the climate is better.

Israel Shamir is based in Moscow and can be reached at [email protected]

This article was first published at The Unz Review.

• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Litvinenko, Russia, Syria 
Hide 113 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Kiza says:

    I will never become a successful foreign journalist, alas. I always say and write what I think and what I see, independently of what the editors want.

    Ain’t that a truth. Amen. A motto of a freelancing journalist: “truth instead of propaganda”. But not all freelancers have such motto, Margolis is a great example of a propaganda freelancer. Serving the regime is much more lucrative, as long as one can stay motivated to keep churning out the standard propaganda sewage articles for NYT, WaPo, BBC, Independent, the Israel Army Radio and the rest of the regimes’ propaganda organs: Russian aggression, Russian danger (greater than Ebola and ISIS combined), Putin Litvinenko killer, Putin Nemtsov killer, “Putin killed my baby son” (in MH17), Putin pedophile, Putin Jew, Putin Hitler, Putin … whatever a Western “news” consuming moron will swallow next.

    This collection of insights and rumors from Moscow is priceless, thank you very much Israel, you truly keep us informed. I humbly encourage every positive reader to buy Shamir’s books online, I swear that they are a great read and they help Israel Shamir to continue writing for us.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  2. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Some thoughts:

    The fate of the Human Species is now in the hands of a narcissistic homosexual Kenyan Foreigner and a sleazy repellant gangster US VP who has the personality profile of a sleazy used car salesman with corn-row hairplugs in his scalp…Be scared…really scared!!!!

    The Negro-Homosexual Democratic Party=MASS MURDER of Conservative Orthodox Christian Russian Civilians in the Ukraine…

    JFK was a notorious WAR CRIMINAL and Traitor. JFK brought the Human Species to within 60 seconds of permanent extinction during the Cuban Missile Crisis. We can all thank a Conservative Orthodox Russian Naval Commander named Vitali Akripov for the continued existence of the Human Species. JFK the TRAITOR:The passage of The 1965 Immigration Reform Act was the filthy reprobate Teddy’s permanent monument of demographic destruction to the reprobate JFK.

    Don’t support the Troops…Commit “treason” against this nonsense and to SATANIC UNIVERSE it exists in…Which will be on full-display during the Superbowl on Feb 7 2016…And what will be on display is this:post-1965 Pakistani Muslim “American” Military Academy Color Guards+car commericials celebrating homosexual male husband and husband raising infant blue-eyed blond haired infant boys and blue-eyed blond haired infant girls.

    To state the very obvious:America=Social and Cultural Filth and Rot!!!!!


    One last thing…NY Giants headcoach Tom Caughlin was a Vietnam War Era chickenhawk-draft-dodger who now acts as highly paid-big $$$$$$$$$$$$$-recruiter for the US Army. What a despicable creature he is!!!!!

    • Disagree: Polymath
    • Replies: @Quartermaster
  3. For this reason, some people in the Russian-Jewish circles subscribed killing of Litvinenko to his erstwhile patron, the demonic billionaire Mr Berezovsky. He had the reasons, and he had the means, as he had first class access to Mossad killing tools

    Sure, that’s a possibility, but a better place to look would be the MI6 itself…

    …recalling the Afghan-Saint Petersberg heroin pipeline and a certain ambassador’s remarks

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  4. @Kiza

    Truly. Reading what’s going on in Russia in this column (contrasted to western media generally) paints portraits of entirely different planets.

    • Agree: Kiza
    • Replies: @annamaria
  5. iffen says:

    For them, Serov is a low-brow painter for rednecks

    Thank you, I didn’t previously have a favorite Russian painter.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    We need to be very honest what these Wounded Warrior Project Infomercials really are about….and it goes something like this:

    1)The Wounded Warriors in the Wounded Warrior Project Infomercials are limbless,brain damaged freaks sporting titanium insect limbs and having their rumps wiped every day by a wife who is at her breaking point and is contemplating an affair.

    2)The White Male “Christian” Chickenhawks with their accounting degrees standing up yelling “WHAT A STUD” in Met Life Stadium in the Meadowlands understand 1) above very well, and are very glad they are not protecting “OUR FREEDOMS” in Iraq and Afghanistan..It’s much more fun to say that “I support the Troops” by having a Bud and stuffing your disgusting shapeless Gob with Doritos”…and say to your chickenhawk self:”I never knew that going to war could be so much FREAKING FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    3)The Wounded Warrior Project Infomercials are Crippled-Freaks War Pornography for the pudgie White Male Irish Catholic Chickenhawk Accountants who sit in Met Life Stadium in the Meadowlands and Yell””WHAT STUD” at young Black Males running around in tight spandex….Then hanging with the chickenhawk ex-jock Boomer Esiason the next day on WFAN and listen to Boomer Esiason declare WAR on Conservative Orthodox Christian Vladmir Putin because Vladmir Putin won’t allow American White Male homo husband and husband to adopt infant blond-hair-blue-eyed Russian Male infants….I’m not making this up!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  7. Rehmat says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Talking about the “Afghan-heroine pipeline” ….

    The Jew have always been among the top merchants in drug trade. Gay Coourter in his book Flowers in the Blood tells the Indian Jews involved in drug trade under the British Raj in India. The longest jail sentence (100 years) in connection with trafficking drug is Shimon Dahan, an Israeli Jew, in Bangkok’s Bangkwong Central Prison. His three inmates, serving sentences for drug trafficking, are also his fellow Jews. Dahan was busted at Bangkok Airport for carrying US$2 million worth of the white-powder in 1993.

    Most of drug trafficking is controlled by Russian Jews and Israel has been known as the Heaven for such criminals. Even Israeli government ministers have been involved in this lucrative trade. Captain Gonen Segev, the former minister of Energy and Infrastructure (1995) in Yitzhak Robin’s cabinet and member of Israeli Knesset – was arrested in April 2004 for smuggling of thousands of Ecstasy tablets from Amsterdam to Israel.

    One of the leading member of America’s pro-Israel lobby groups such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which was founded in 1908 by Canon Edward West, as a subsidary of Jewish B’nai B’rith – Morris Barney Dalitz, a Las Vegas businessman – was one of the most important figures in organized crime for sixty years.

    Poppy seed has religious significance during Jewish PURIM holiday season. According to the tradition – Persian Jewish Queen Esther, refused to eat non-kosher food and chose a vegetarian diet of beans, nuts and poppy seed in King’s Palace…..

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  8. Rehmat says:

    Israel Shamir reminds of his fellow ex-Israeli writer, Gilad Atzmon. While Shamir is obsessed with Russia, Atzmon is with his anti-Zionism.

    However, one thing both have in common, is they have been listed among the 8,000 S.H.I.T Jewish list.

    In 2011, Israel Shamir gave an interview to American Jewish journalist Will Yakowicz. Will Yakowicz’ version of the interview was published by the Jewish ‘Tablet magazine’ under explosive title ‘His Jewish Problem’.

    Shamir told Will that when he was living in Palestine, he felt daily that destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque would bring to the end of the world.

    Shamir did not deny his comparing Israeli soldiers with Nazis.

    When asked to elaborate his claim that anti-Semitism is an article of Jewish faith, Shamir replied: “How do the Jews explain hatred of Gentiles? By their envy. They say that everybody is envious of Jews, and for this reason they hate. It is an article of Jewish faith that everybody should be envious of Jews because Jews are close to God. I hardly ever met a person who would be envious of Jews. That is why I do not believe in existence of anti-Semitism. I’ve met people who were described as anti-Semites; some of them would hate the concept, the idea of Jews but hardly anybody would hate Jews as persons”…..

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  9. annamaria says:

    How the British legal system has made a laughing stock of itself by allowing an eager ideologist to perform a role of coroner:
    There is a “strong probability” that the coroner, Mr. Owen, is an ordinary opportunist.

  10. @Rehmat

    When it comes to corruption, there is nothing special about Jews. George H.W. Bush and Robert Gates are Gentile examples of organized intelligence agency crime second to none.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  11. Good article. The Litvinenko murder is a fine example of Putin Derangement Syndrome. Like the Bush and Obama version, it does not make much sense. Any head of state is going to kill people. But in any of these deaths often attributed to governments, other explanations seem better suited to the facts. A Litvinenko ally that he trusted seems the most likely culprit.

    • Replies: @Quartermaster
  12. Rehmat says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    A living example of Jewish SELF-DENIAL.

    A 2010 study conducted by Professor Daniel Bar-Tal (Tel Aviv University) found out that an average Israeli prefer to live in ‘self-denial’ as he/she is not interested to know the facts about the Israel-Palestine conflict. They’re brainwashed with Zionist narrative of the conflict and hatred toward Arabs and Muslims from an early age. The Zionist rabbis are known for using Talmudic texts to create hatred toward Arabs, Blacks and Christians.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  13. Rehmat says:

    Israel Shamir should no that the Emir of Qatar is no Avigdor Lieberman (a Russian Jew ex-FM of Israel) that Putin can trust. Qatar, like Saudi Arabia, is a creation and colony of Anglo-American imperialism.

    Qatar has a population of 1.5 million, out of which only 20% are native Qataris. The Emirate sits atop one of the world’s largest gas fields, which it shares with Islamic Republic. Qatar has 13.5 percent of global natural gas reserves, but it was Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani’s big bet in the early 1990s on gas-to-liquid technologies which continues to pay huge dividends for him today. From their strategic location in the Gulf, Qatar’s fleet of more than 50 gas trains can go where the growth is, whether it is East or West.

    Sheikh Hamad knows how to play a political balancing game. He started funding mercenaries against Qaddafi long before Israel-Firster Sarkozy started bombing Libya. Currently, he along with Saudi ‘royals’ is funding defeated Lebanon’s prime minister Sa’ad Hariri to destablize Syria and Lebanon. However, he is maintaining ‘friendly’ relations with Iran and Turkey. He met Ahmadinejad in Tehran on August 25 and later went to meet Erdogan in Ankara.

    In 2010 – Qatar invested $32 billion in the US and Europe – mostly in real estate.

  14. @Rehmat

    I’m not surprised at your utter failure to grasp:

    When it comes to corruption, there is nothing special about Jews. George H.W. Bush and Robert Gates are Gentile examples of organized intelligence agency crime second to none

    I mean you come across like some deranged-Jews-obsessed-moron-maniac. Truly. About as crazed as the ‘Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain’ ‘homo’ obsession that reads like he’d ripped-off and then perverted lines from a Dr Bronner’s ‘all in one magic soap’ label.

    ^ Sensible people, on the other hand, grasp criminally sick people are simply criminally sick people whether Muslim, Jew or Christian. It’s not rocket science.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  15. Excellent piece. More like this please.

  16. @War for Blair Mountain

    Russia is anything but the sky blue purity you think it is. Putin is a revanchist liar and part of the mafia.

  17. @Positive Dennis

    It is known that Litvinenko died from Polonium poisoning. Britsih authorities were able to trace the movements of the man who spiked Litvinenko’s tea by the presence of Polonium 210 at the places where he stayed. The probability they have fingered the man who actually carried out the murder is as close 1 as you can get. Who ordered it may be a question, but the man who actually carried it out is known.

    Litvinenko was a very vocal Putin critic and a lot of what he said was hitting Putin where he lived. Putin had the motive to have the man killed, so there is a good probability that Putin is the guy who ordered it.

    • Replies: @Kiza
    , @krollchem
  18. Rehmat says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    You want to talk about “moron” Israeli hasbara filth. It’s okey with me.

    In 2004, the Jewish Quarterly published a confession by porn historian Dr. Nathan Abrams Jewish), claiming that Hollywood porn industry has always been dominated by Jews. Abrams refers to Smut Kings as ‘true blue Jews’ and pornography, “a weapon” Jews use against Gentiles.

    Chicago-born Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner (died 2000) in his 1995 book, Can Families Survive in Pagan America?, blamed Jews in Hollywood and media of corrupting the western societies.

    Last year, Dr. Lasha Darkmonn posted a very detailed article, calling pornography a Secret Jewish Weapon against non-Jewish people.

    “Who are the richest and most successful entrepreneurs of the $100 billion year porn industry? The peddlers of pornography belongs to all races, but one race above all stands out as preeminent in this field. Selling sex, like slave trafficking and moneylending, has always been a Jewish specialty,” Darkmoon said.

    “There is little doubt that the virulent sex epidemic we witness all around us is a deliberately planned sex psyop. This is what governments want. The Puppet Masters who pull the hidden strings of our Western regimes, all masquerading as democracies, have managed to manufacture exactly what we see when we look around us: widespread neurosis, mass misery, the collapse of moral values, Christianity in ruins, and the coarse brutalization of the common man. No need for gulags for those who consent to their own chains,” she concludes.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    Warhol and Hirst suck almighty….

    but they do have a kind of value.

    It makes people feel free, as if anything is possible.

    It opens up the idea of art and creativity to be just about anything.

    This can lead to dumb decadence and moronosity — and this is true enough of most of the art world — , but it can also encourage a spirit of freedom.
    Also, irreverence is liberating.

    Serov was a good artist — better than just about anyone today — , but when we look at his stuff, we feel “art must be something like this”. It doesn’t inspire us to seek something new and bold.

    Now, I loathe Warhol and Hirst, but there is the sense about their works that ‘art is what you make it to be with your will, vision, zaniness, craziness, wit, daring, etc.’
    Such attitude usually leads to bad art most of the time… but it can also open doors to amazing new things.

    After all, so many great things had ‘vulgar’ and ridiculous beginnings.

    It’s like American popular music was looked down upon by snobs in the beginning. Now, the snobs had good reasons for doing so.
    But there was something about low American music that said ‘music can be anything’, whereas high European music said ‘music must be THIS’.

    In the end, the spirit of freedom won out.

    • Replies: @5371
    , @RobinG
    , @Anonymous
  20. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    I agree that Boomer Esiason is terrible. He’s such a fraud and a poser.

    Mike Francesa on WFAN is excellent though.

  21. 5371 says:
    @Priss Factor

    So if you shit on your dining room floor, it’s a great advance for sanitation, because using the lavatory just wouldn’t give you that feeling that everything is possible? Give me a break, Priss.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  22. @Rehmat

    Jew obsessed rehmat thinks Hollywood porn is the worst of the USA’s problems. I bet he’d blame the Jews for Catholic pedophilia corrupting politicians:

    What rehmat can’t grasp because he’s obsessed with Jews is:

    When it comes to corruption, there is nothing special about Jews. George H.W. Bush and Robert Gates are Gentile examples of organized intelligence agency crime second to none

    Actually rehmat reminds me of a certain Christian philosopher’s stance:

    “In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary ways of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God, or makes observations concerning human affairs; when all of a sudden I am surprised to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not. This change is imperceptible; but is however, of the last consequence. For as this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, ’tis necessary that it should be observed and explained; and at the same time that a reason should be given, for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it. But as authors do not commonly use this precaution, I shall presume to recommend it to the readers; and am persuaded, that this small attention would subvert all the vulgar systems of morality, and let us see, that the distinction of vice and virtue is not founded merely on the relations of objects, nor is perceived by reason”

  23. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    You just want war with Conservative Orthodox Christian Russia..along with the narcissistic homosexual Kenyan Foreigner and the fat-ankled-hairy-bulldyke.

    You are a filthy parasite….now F off…

  24. Yevardian says:

    From wikipedia:

    Litvinenko converted to Islam in Britain after having become friends with exiled Chechen separatist leaders.

    Litvinenko converted to Islam in Britain after having become friends with exiled Chechen separatist leaders.

    Nothing left to say.

    Rehmat, what are you even doing here? If you really are who you say your are and aren’t just trolling; do you really think you’ll find anyone sympathetic to your worldview here? Other than blaming Jews for everything up to your latest bowel movements of course. Piss off.

  25. Kiza says:

    Putin had the motive to have the man killed, so there is a good probability that Putin is the guy who ordered it.

    A country (UK) in which a coroner makes accusations just like you wrote here is not a country of laws then a totalitarian hellhole ruled through propaganda and innuendo. But what is new, this was always the George Orwell’s Britain?

    Therefore, you are on the wrong side.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  26. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    “So if you shit on your dining room floor, it’s a great advance for sanitation, because using the lavatory just wouldn’t give you that feeling that everything is possible?”

    See it this way.

    Shitting at Stalin’s dinner would have been a more revolutionary act than having good manners.

    I didn’t say wild freedom and anarchy in and of themselves are good. I said they can unleash certain creative energies.
    This is why all systems fear irreverence. This goes for PC too. We are not supposed to shit on Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner. We are supposed to treat him or ‘her’ as a holy icon.

    But I’ll say this…
    What is dangerous about our PC world is that irreverence and satire have been appropriated by the powers-that-be.
    There was a time when Jews and radicals had much less power. So, they used irreverence and satire to undermine authority and conventional values. They shook up the system. But they were not content to be satirists and subversives. They wanted to gain power and impose what they saw was righteous and true. So, they became the new dogmatists. But because they rose to power by employing satire and irreverence, they came to own the cult of irreverence even though they were in position to suppress irreverence aimed at their own holy cows. It is dangerous for the powerful to own the cult of ‘irreverence’.
    Also, the rich class learned that they could buy off the satirists, the critics, and nasties. Rich could buy up the media and hire only those ‘critical’ voices they approve of. Rich could patronize certain ‘edgy’ artists who basically ended up doing the bidding of rich folks whose only interest in the arts is as financial investment. It’s been a symbiotic relationship. The radical artist could pretend that he’s duping the rich by selling them junk at super-high prices, but the rich don’t care since that they are being ‘fooled’ since any ‘art’ will do to serve their financial schemes of hiding money by investing in ‘art’. So, the joke is on the artist and on the investor, and wink wink, both sides know and get what they want. This is why the rich loved Warhol so much. Same reason why the rich love homos as the favorite ‘progressives’. Homos know how to work with the rich.

    Still, there is value in irreverence. Just look at the culture of trolling. Sure, much of it is retarded and stupid. But there are cases where the trolls open up the debate and knock down the PC barriers erected to control the discourse within certain set perimeters.

    Now, I’m not saying irreverence is itself art. But sometimes, it can unleash energies and allow a kind of spirit that liberates the soul and opens up new possibilities.
    Besides, creativity doesn’t have to be about serious or ennobling art all the time.

    I love classic music but I also love what the Marx Brothers did with it. And that is what’s great about America and Jewish attitude. Instead of just being reverent and submissive all the time, a time to poke fun and laugh.
    Dylan was a clown and poet, and his clowning was an essential part of his poetics.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  27. annamaria says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    And the presstituting MSM is in no hurry to publish this kind of articles:
    “China shows a Third Way for Arab world:”
    “…this is a spectacular diplomatic feat by China to outflank the US’ pivot strategy in the Asia-Pacific and at the same time to challenge Uncle Sam in his traditional hunting grounds. It’s double whammy, since from Cairo Xi traveled to Tehran where he forewarned Washington that Iran’s long-awaited accession as member of Shanghai Cooperation Organization is getting under way.”

  28. I don’t understand. If Putin, as he must, wants to know what happened to Litvinenko why doesn’t he put him on trial?

    • Replies: @Avery
  29. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Vladmir Putin won’t allow American White Male homo husband and husband to adopt infant blond-hair-blue-eyed Russian Male infants

    “Murdered spy claimed Putin was caught on film having sex with boys in same Moscow flat where Russian prosecutor was secretly taped cavorting with two prostitutes”

    • Agree: Kiza
  30. Avery says:

    {….why doesn’t he put him on trial?}

    Litvinenko is dead as a doornail: as in past tense.
    President Putin can’t put the rat on trial, because the rat’s corpse is radioactive.

    And, No: President Putin must not “wants” to know what happened.
    What the heck for ?
    Who the heck is Litvinenko that the President of RF has to “wants” to know what happened.
    The rat was offed by someone: who cares who.
    The Rat is gone to rat heaven.
    Good riddance.

    What happened to gangster Berezovsky ?
    Who cares ?
    He’s gone to gangster heaven.
    Good riddance.

    What happened to rat-gangster-reptile Khodorkovsky ?
    What’s that ? He is still slithering ?
    Ohhhh: sorry we have to wait.

    • Replies: @anony-mouse
  31. Kiza says:

    It is not a problem when UK gutter press creates such fairy tales to satisfy its owner’s, the old Morlock’s (Murdoch’s) perverted desires, but it is a problem when one of the highest UK law offices starts doing the same. That is not a good sign for the future of the inhabitants of the old Isle. UK is probably a country gone the furthest on the totalitarian path.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Wizard of Oz
    , @Kiza
  32. krollchem says:

    Polonium 210, in pure powder form is an expensive way to kill a critic.
    First how do you know that he was not smuggling polonium for the UK government?

    Second alpha radiation from polonium 210 kill a significant portion of the 480,000 deaths in the US due to tobacco use. I do not see you up in arms about the terrorists and mass murderers at Phillip Morris and the other tobacco companies (including Russian ones)!

    Background on polonium and health links:

    Third, why do you focus on some unsolved crime case when Israel, Canada, France, UK and US (I-Can-FUKUS) have killed millions in the middle East?

  33. @Avery

    ‘Litvinenko is dead as a doornail: as in past tense.’


    Never stopped Putin before:

    As to his body being radioactive, well its not like you actually have to have the corpse present in the courtroom to have a postmortem trial do you?

    Magnitsky’s wasn’t.

    • Replies: @Avery
    , @5371
  34. RobinG says:
    @Priss Factor

    Dear Miss Priss,

    In the third photo we see, not only how great the Israeli flag looks mounted on a dog turd, but also that Israelis, like the French, don’t bother to curb their dogs, much less scoop after them.
    tiny Israeli flags wrapped around toothpicks were spotted on the sidewalks of Tel Aviv sticking out of piles of dog poop

    YES, IT”S ART!!!!!

    (And I’m looking for the video of Natalie shitting on the Israeli flag for 5371.)

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  35. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    If it’s not true, then why did Putin’s thugs assassinate Litivenko?

  36. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    The element of SHOCK no longer works.

    I can think of stuff that can certainly offend. Imagine a painting of Anne Frank blowing Hitler. Or MLK as a KKK wizard.

    But it still won’t shock because nothing is shocking anymore.

    Shock jumped the shark long time ago. Even social conservatives, who were once easy to shock, just ignore the garbage. They once burned Beatle records after Lennon said ‘We are bigger than Jesus’. But they don’t even stand up to homo flags in churches.

    Since tradition is gone, innovation is gone, shock is gone, what is left?

    There is still SHOP. Art is now just just shopping for the very rich.
    That’s it. Art itself matters infinitely less than what rich people are willing to pay for it. It’s just a speculation game. Art Gallery is part of Wall Street. Has been for a long time.
    Art criticism is now just financial advice.

    Only innovation in creativity is technology-related.
    Much of the talent go into movies or video games.

    The art of painting has turned into just a money game for the rich.

    • Replies: @RobinG
  37. annamaria says:

    Was not the UK legal system has been caught on coverup of certain high-placed Britons involved in pedophilia and murder of children? These crimes were not “probable” but well documented.
    And yet the British prudes have became alerted by a statement of a triple agent. And what a timing! At exactly the same time when the US has gathered all their resources to demonize a Prez of another country, as if the US do not have their own problems with the violations of the Geneva Conventions, illegal wars of aggression initiated on lies (the wars have resulted in destruction of several states and the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of human beings of all ages), and extrajudicial killings.
    Luke 6:42 “Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?”
    The Litvinenko father and younger brother both do not agree with the verdict of the “probabilistic” judge Oven:

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  38. @Anonymous

    “If it’s not true, then why did Putin’s thugs assassinate Litivenko?”

    Saying it’s so doesn’t make it so. You sound like Murdoch’s moans when he bends over to take in the a** for MI6. Weird people enjoy the most perverted stuff –

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  39. Avery says:

    Here is what you wrote:

    {I don’t understand. If Putin, as he must, wants to know what happened to Litvinenko why doesn’t he put him on trial?}

    Do you understand that the phrase “…why doesn’t…put him on trial…” implies someone has to be alive to be put on trial ?
    As in, questioned, cross-examined, etc.

    Do you understand the English sentences you post, or you just writing English sentences without understanding their meaning?

    • Replies: @Avery
  40. Avery says:

    addendum: doing something stupid, like putting dead Magnitsky on trial, does not mean the same stupid circus must be repeated.

  41. RobinG says:
    @Priss Factor

    That’s just you. You’re so hip. But the Israeli political police found Vaxberg ‘shocking’ and slapped her wrist (a night in jail, etc.)

    The dog turds were just funny. And cute.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  42. Seraphim says:

    @It is an article of Jewish faith that everybody should be envious of Jews because Jews are close to God

    This is what they like to believe, although, deep down, they know that it is not true. That’s the real source of their neurosis and chutzpah.

  43. There is an interesting version of who and why killed Litvinenko. This was proposed by Jaures Medvedev, a Russian scientist and activist who lived in London in that time. He said Litvinenko organised a blackmail ring to blackmail Russian oligarchs. As an organised-crime-desk man in the FSB, he had a lot of hot stuff. Blackmailing is dangerous, so he was bumped off.

    • Replies: @Kiza
  44. Kiza says:

    They throw it out there into the pig pen, for the pigs to slurp. And many do. It does not make it truth, unless you are one of the four-legged ones targeted by such low-brow propaganda.

  45. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    “But the Israeli political police found Vaxberg ‘shocking’ and slapped her wrist (a night in jail, etc.)”

    They were offended. Not shocked.

    In art, there is only the Shop Doctrine.

  46. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    Oh no, here we go again.

    It’s all about the SHOP.

    Things now have value purely on celebrity.

    Some famous photographer took a pic of a potato.

    And then, some rich famous guy bought it.

    So, it has value.

  47. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    It makes no sense for Putin’s henchman to assassinate Litivenko like that unless he had those tapes or knew about them.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  48. 5371 says:

    Magnitsky’s alleged crimes, unlike the death of Litvinenko, happened on Russian territory.

  49. Yevardian says:

    A religious-group considering itself closer to God than rival denominations is hardly unique.

  50. @annamaria

    It is one thing to doubt that a British judge has actually arrived at the truth of the Litvinenko murder but what makes you say confidently that his brother and father “do not agree” with the judge’s conclusion?

    And what makes you support that alleged opinion as you appear to do? Say that you have actually read the inquiry report and the published evidence. Say that you find fault with it. Above all say how you justify basing your views instead on an Asia Times recycling of material from the notorious and blatant (but often clever) Russian propaganda site RT?

  51. @Kiza

    Are you ignorant or merely careless in appearing to assert that the Daily Mail story had something to do with Rupert Murdoch?

    I suppose it is useless to ask you for evidence of Murdoch’s actual views on Putin or Russia given that you don’t appear to be aware that Murdoch has never had any interest in the Daily Mail.

  52. @Kiza

    Especially because English is nor your mother tongue it would aid acceptance of your arguments if you didn’t allow faulty grammar to destroy sense and logic when your emotions are inflamed or you have drunk too much alcohol. Or you could just consider being courteous to anyone unwary enough to give time to reading the logical and linguistic garbage which is your paragraph beginning “A country (UK)…”
    It appears to be saying that the head of the inquiry whom you describe as a coroner couldn’t arrive at and state his (probabilistic) conclusions about the cause of and responsibility for Litvinenko’s death without Britain being a totalitarian (sic) state. You add more utter rubbish in citing George Orwell while proving that you have never acquainted yourself with his writings.

    You seem to have some cause or agenda. You should be embarrassed to write for it in a way which can only discredit it if only by the evidence that you don’t actually think it important enough to take trouble over.

  53. @Priss Factor

    Thank you for being willing to throw pearls before swine and even give a second helping.

  54. @krollchem

    I’m disappointed to find you firing buckshot at random.

    Why did Quartermaster “focus” on Litvinenko’s murder (as you seem to accept it was when you refer to an “unsolved crime” despite your curious “How do you know” question)? Because, unlike the totally irrelevant public health issues you introduce, that was a substantial part of what the Shamir article was about!

    And are you serious in suggesting that Russia wouldn’t use an expensive method to kill an enemy of the President? Really! You didn’t think before writing your first sentence did you?

    And why, out of the blue, pose the baseless fantasy about Litvinenko smuggling Polonium? Why should Quartermaster even have that amongst the top 20 imaginary and imaginative alternative storylines if you insist that he doubt what an experienced judge found on evidence before him?

    • Replies: @krollchem
  55. @Anonymous

    So, that’s why you can’t make sense with anything you say…

    Did you ever see a laddie go this way and that way –


  56. One of the things I like best about Shamir is that his prose is so good that grammatical errors only add character to his writing, rather than detract from its quality. Not only are the ideas that he presents uniformly clear and well-argued; but moreover his literally ability alone makes his stuff worth reading.


    On topic, like a number of other people, I also thought that Litvinenko was poisoned by the Russian secret services, with or without Putin’s knowledge. Executed for treason you might say. But now, following the demented British report, I have, again like a number of other people, become convinced that the Russian government and secret services are largely innocent of Litvinenko’s death.

    Basically, when the guys in charge release conclusions based on “secret information,” I can’t help but assume that they are making it all up.

    • Replies: @Kiza
  57. @krollchem

    I focused on Litvinenko because that’s one of the subjects of the article at hand.. You can allow your weak mind to wander all you like, but the idea that Putin had nothing to do with the murder of the man is simply imaginative.

    By using Polonium, Russia was sending a very plain message. I realize you have problems with such things, but Putin does not.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  58. Rehmat says:

    The Jewish multi-billionaire media tycon and politician, Boris Abramovich Berezovsky is wanted for arrest in both Russia and Brazil. Boris was a close friend of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned with a lethal dose of radioactive Polonium-210 in a London sushi bar. Russian author, Paul Klebnikov has called Boris Berezovsky “Godfather of the Kremlin” in his 2000 book by the same name. Currently, Boris is reportedly backing the exiled Chechen politician Ahmed Zakayev, currently living in Britain.

    “The September 2004 Beslan hostage crisis, which led to the deaths of over 300 people including many children, another event blamed on Chechen terrorists, was also wrought with contradictions and red flags suggesting inside involvement. The Beslan massacre occurred amidst a wave of terror attacks in Russia and shortly after the crashes of two Tupolev passenger airliners, which were blamed on Chechen terrorists by authorities. However, citing the fact that the aircraft debris was scattered over large areas, the independent Russian media accused Vladimir Putin of ordering the planes shot down in a crude false flag ploy to secure an election victory for the pro-Kremlin Chechen President Alu Alkhanov two days later,” wrote Alex Jones.

    • Replies: @RobinG
  59. annamaria says:
    “I became ‘honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma,’ … Why? Because I write pro-American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA. Why? Because I am pro-American. I am fed up with it; I don’t want to do it anymore; and so I have just written a book, not to earn money, no, it will cause a lot of trouble for me. [I wrote it instead] to give the people in this country, Germany, in Europe, and all over the world, just a glimpse of … what goes on behind the closed doors. …”

    It is obvious that you, Quartermaster are not comfortable with the spirit of Unz Review. Your condescending tone towards krollchem invites a smile, considering the teen-like simplicity of your comments (your posts are rather consistent with FauxNews and such than with the independent media). It is not for nothing that someone else on this forum grouped you with Jim Christian, Chaban, and Wizard of Oz.
    Here for your group is an article (written by another independent thinker) on the matter of Mr. Oven’s “very probably” opportunistic “verdict:”
    And here is more on something that your beloved MSM would not touch, because the western MSM owners (all 5 or 6 of them) know what is better for the average reader:

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @krollchem
  60. annamaria says:

    To wet your interest to the newly-published article on
    “Since World War II, the Republican Party has been closely allied with pro-Nazi exile leaders from Eastern Europe. Many of them were recruited and paid by the CIA — and given secret legal exemptions to emigrate to the United States despite their history of war crimes… The CIA and Pentagon also earmarked millions of dollars’ worth of arms and other military aid to anti-Soviet Ukrainian guerrillas in the late 1940s, despite their record of atrocities against Jews and other civilians. In hindsight, it is clear that the Ukrainian guerrilla option became the prototype for hundreds of CIA operations worldwide that have attempted to exploit indigenous discontent in order to make political gains for the United States.”

  61. RobinG says:

    “Currently, Boris is reportedly backing the exiled Chechen politician Ahmed Zakayev, …”

    Currently he’s 3 years dead, no?

  62. @Anonymous

    I hear that Putin is a wicked necromancer, who wants to raise up an army of the undead, conquer the world, and declare himself King!

  63. Kiza says:

    It is very time consuming to find information contrary to the regime propaganda. This is only one why propaganda is successful – it is so much easier and quicker to consume the propaganda pig feed served through MSM. One does not need to form own opinion (spend time and money researching an issue) when the talking head has an opinion ready-made for you.

    This is why sometimes we have to take such short-cuts as you just suggested. I find this totally reasonable. If I researched 20 issues and always found the regime lying, then I feel justified to form an opinion that if the regime is really, really keen to convince me of their enemy’s guilt, then there is an extremely high probability that the regime’s insinuations are the usual smear job.

    A few years ago, I formulated this point in a following way.

    The West calls most of its enemies “Hitler”, typically because it is the Zionists and their Western henchmen who initiate smear campaigns,
    Mugabe Hitler
    Milosevic Hitler
    Saddam Hitler
    Gaddafi Hitler
    Assad Hitler
    Putin Hitler …
    But what all these Hitlers have in common is that they care(d) about their own people and resisted to be puppets of the West. Therefore, when the Anglo-Zionists call some leader a Hitler, this is like the British giving him/her a title “Sir”. When the West smears a foreign leader, calls him Hitler, killer, pedophile, thrower of babies out of incubators, distributor of Viagra for rapes etc, this is the most reliable sign, a stamp of approval, that this leader works to protect the interests of his own people,
    Sir Hitler Mugabe
    Sir Hitler Milosevic
    Sir Hitler Saddam
    Sir Hitler Gaddafi
    Sir Hitler Assad
    Sir Hitler Putin.
    We do not need to know the background of the story.

  64. krollchem says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Do you subscribe to the opinion that one death is a tragedy and a million deaths is a statistic? To me this is a myopic viewpoint.

    Why are you and Quartermaster interested in a single death? Could it be that you are grasping at straws to try to blame Putin? This death occurred in 2006, why didn’t this get investigated and solved at that time? Bringing this up now seems to be a political attack.

    My focus on mass deaths is why this story should not have released for political gain. The less the general public knows about the toxicity and chemistry of polonium the better, trust me on this point!!! I will not try to educate you about the radiochemistry of polonium.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  65. Kiza says:
    @Israel Shamir

    What most people in the West do not appreciate is that FSB operates in Russia as CIA and FBI combined – they fight both domestic organised crime (especially white collar) and foreign intelligence. Could someone knowledgeable correct me if I am wrong on this. Having worked in the crime fighting unit of FSB (if this is true), Litvinenko had access only to information on crime, not on Russian foreign intelligence activity. As every Soviet/Russian defector before him, he tried to use the information he brought with him to make a living in the new country. Therefore, it would be quite logical that he would turn to those Russian crime figures he was investigating, who ran away to Britain and US, to sell them the FSB files on them, and to turn them into benefactors. When his main benefactor, Berezovsky, realized that his dream of doing a coup against Putin were a pipe dream, he stopped supporting Litvinenko. Then Litvinenko had to resort to other sources of income, such as smuggling and blackmail. Whether Litvinenko was really poisoned by polonium or not is not clear, because the source of this piece of information, the British Government, is a highly biased source. He just could have been poisoned.

    Polonium is needed in this story to “prove” that it was a government sponsored crime, but why would the Russian Government (Putin) bother with such a complicated arrangement of carrying the detectable radioactive material through airports and customs, when a bullet into the back of the head or ordinary poison would have done the same job? In case of Arafat, the Israelis did not have to carry the radioactive polonium anywhere, Arafat was already in Palestine, easily accessible.

    In summary, Putin killing Litvinenko carries as much water as Putin killing Nemtsov on a street leading to Kremlin. It is the usual pig feed for the dumbed down Western masses. The most likely explanation is that Litvinenko either poisoned himself with the radioactive material he was smuggling, or he was poisoned (with ordinary poison) by one of the crime figures he was blackmailing. Like Shamir, I believe in the latter.

  66. @Krollchem

    Understood but I think you are being unfair to those of us who choose to take an interest in a subject, or at least the handling of it, which is raised in the very headline of the article. I don’t think you are right about the delay and the implication that the inquiry was just opportunistically set up to meet an immediate political requirement. My recollection is that the police investigated in the ordinary way, murder was eventually established, as were the identities of the perpetrators, and extradition was sought. Finally, as last resort, an inquiry was set up to try and establish the truth of a very important crime. Not at all like any old mugging gone wrong that the tabloids might pick up on if there was merely a salacious angle.

    As to polonium I suspect your care not to educate the wider criminal community will be of no avail if they have already learned online that that isotope of polonium is “250,000 times as toxic as cyanide”, that it is not dangerous to handle as long as you don’t let it touch any part of your body which would allow it to enter your bloodstream, and that therefore getting just a barely visible amount into a person’s lungs or mouth will be fatal but not immediately revealed as toxic unless the dose is unnecessarily large. In short perfectly tasteless and perfectly fatal. But……

    Could even you tell the would be malefactors what is really missing from the murder scenario…namely, how do you get your hands on it?

    And, to answer your opening paragraph, it is a red herring brought up by you because there was no reason on this thread to discuss public health issues such as you mention. It would make some suspicious minds think you were trying to downplay and draw attention away from a Putin critic’s murder. I am more inclined to read it as a rather relaxed careless way of indicating in a general way that people tend to lose sight of the bigger issues, as they indeed do. But here was the wrong context, though I’m very happy to read people making good points about the difference between the 300,000 people killed annually by guns in the US compared with the infinitesimal number killed by terrorist acts, just for one obvious example.

    • Replies: @krollchem
  67. krollchem says:

    Thanks for the link. I was interested to see that the UK government was not pleased with the Judge’s action. This is consistent with my subsequent response to the Wizard that this should not have been publicized for reasons that should not be elaborated on.

    Always appreciate that you also provide links to help in educating others. It is a welcome contrast to the cabal of posters that just like to throw grenades and run, having NEVER ever posted links supporting their conclusion.

  68. Kiza says:

    Correction, the Daily Mail is a British daily middle-market tabloid newspaper owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust, it was established by Lord Northcliffe in 1896.

    “The Daily Mail was Britain’s first daily newspaper aimed at the newly-literate “lower-middle class market resulting from mass education, combining a low retail price with plenty of competitions, prizes and promotional gimmicks”, and was the first British paper to sell a million copies a day.

    It was at the outset a newspaper for women, the first to provide features especially for them, and as of the second-half of 2013 had a 54.77% female readership, the only British newspaper whose female readers constitute more than 50% of its demographic.

    The paper has been criticised by doctors and scientists for its sensationalist reporting on medical subjects.”

    Typical reporting:
    Did Putin plant the holiday jet bomb that killed 224 Russians? Ex-KGB agent claims this dossier proves the Kremlin orchestrated the atrocity to justify waging war on Syria

    Read more:

    Sometimes, it is simply impossible to imagine that people who suck up such crap actually exists in the society we share!? The propagandists who write such pig feed are totally sick and perverted Brits, but I never blame the propagandists then their consumers, the pigs. But I love the closing touch: “decide for yourself – it is not us who say then an ex-KGB” (who we paid for the interview). Alas, maybe someone could explain the high-brow Daily Mail readers than KGB is no-more.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  69. Yevardian says:

    Well there are posters like Tom_R & Blair Mountain who post walls of links in an attempt to divert every thread to the same tired topic… but yes there have been many quality links here.

    I personally think its more logical an Oligarch poisoned Litvinenko.
    I doubt Putin cared much about what dirt on his government a low-level FSB field operative would have. Also the West mostly hated him before the poisoning-accusations anyway, so why bother taking the risk?
    Why take the care to poison a relative nobody like Litvinenko when far bigger rivals like Khodorkhovsky or Gessen mouth off regularly?
    Even if the Kremlin did kill him, I can’t say I would particularly care (although I am against the death.p except in extreme cases).
    America would probably have killed Snowden or Assange had they not become world-famous, and that Litvinenko converted to Mahometanism (in a warzone against his own country) is a huge red-flag. Fuck him.

  70. annamaria says:

    There is a well-established fact that the pro-US Ukrainians include both the neo-Nazis and radical jihadis.
    “Andrew E. Kramer reported that there were three Islamic battalions “deployed to the hottest zones,” such as around the port city of Mariupol. One of the battalions is headed by a former Chechen warlord who goes by the name “Muslim.” The Chechen commands the Sheikh Mansur group, named for an 18th-century Chechen resistance figure. It is subordinate to the nationalist Right Sector, a Ukrainian militia. … Right Sector … formed during [2014] street protests in Kiev from a half-dozen fringe Ukrainian nationalist groups like White Hammer and the Trident of Stepan Bandera. Another, the Azov group, is openly neo-Nazi, using the ‘Wolf’s Hook’ symbol associated with the [Nazi] SS. Without addressing the issue of the Nazi symbol, the Chechen said he got along well with the nationalists because, like him, they loved their homeland and hated the Russians.”
    “During the February 2014 coup that ousted elected President Viktor Yanukovych, the late fascist Stepan Bandera was one of the Ukrainian icons celebrated by the Maidan protesters. During World War II, Bandera headed the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists-B, a radical paramilitary movement that sought to transform Ukraine into a racially pure state. At times coordinating with Adolf Hitler’s SS, OUN-B took part in the expulsion and extermination of tens of thousands of Jews and Poles.”

    Where is Anti-defamatioan League when we need it? The ADL claims that it was founded in 1913 “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.” But tell that to the ADL & AIPAC’ darlings, the Kagans clan: the Kagans have made an enormous contribution to defaming the memory of those Jews that perished in Europe during the WWII. There is no way to decouple the Kagans (and other prominent ziocons like Kristols, Krouthummer at al) from the ongoing Ukrainan tragedy.

  71. annamaria says:

    “another occupation”
    Western MSM is deadly silent about the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov “year-in-review press conference before an audience of about 150 journalists, including the BBC correspondent Steve Rosenberg and many other well-known representatives of mainstream Western media..”
    “Our Western colleagues sometimes declare with passion that there can no longer be ‘business as usual with Russia.’ I am convinced that this is so and here we agree: there will be no more ‘business as usual’ when they tried to bind us with agreements which take into account above all the interests of either the European Union or the United States and they wanted to persuade us that this will do no harm to our interests. That history is over and done with. A new stage of history is dawning which can develop only on the basis of equal rights and all other principles of international law.”
    “Regarding a similar news blackout that followed another major Russian press briefing, the sharp-tongued Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova commented, what are all these accredited Western reporters doing in Moscow if nothing gets published abroad? Do they have some other occupation?”
    In keeping with custom, the Russian Foreign Ministry posted the entire video recording of Lavrov’s press conference on and posted transcripts in Russian and English on the site. ”

  72. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    He’s wrong about the great Matisse but this is pretty funny.

  73. krollchem says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    As we both know about 97% of the polonium is produced in Russia. Was it smuggled as some articles suggested, or was it a murder?

    The US and UK inability to produce useful radioactive isotopes is well known. The US even got out of the medical isotope game and imports a lot of these products from Canada. The last US produced radioactive isotope was yttrium produced from a strontium cow at Hanford in about 1996. Yes DOE has recently tested creating Pu238 for space probes, but still gets their supplies from Russia.

    To answer your question about finding the exact source of polonium. I agree that this would be impossible given the purity of Bi-209 from which the polonium was created.

    As for the murder angle, I do not understand why you focus on the Putin critic approach and not some of the Russian mafia enemies of Litvinenko. I guess Putin is already declared guilty in The Mail and other British rags. Sorry, but I do not buy that angle. Again, why kill with polonium when there are much cheaper options such as a bullet? Again, why is this death not of sudden interest in the mass media? This sudden focus sounds like the application of Edward Bernays “Propaganda” TOMA to shape the masses.

    speaking of gun deaths, from all causes, in the US, the estimates are about 30,000 and not 300,000. This is about the same as auto accidents and polonium 210 deaths from smoking.

  74. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Daily Mail is the leading online newspaper of the world:

    It’s the world’s most popular online newspaper because it isn’t afraid to publish the truth, no matter how disturbing the truth is. The truth about Putin’s past should not be censored just because he is president. The Daily Mail understands this.

    • Replies: @Kiza
  75. Kiza says:

    I did mention the pig swill, no need to repeat. Maybe you are just proud to be in the pen with Daily Mail readers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  76. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I understand your view that some truths like Putin’s past are so disturbing and distressing that they should not be told to the public. Such truths may cause public outrage and chaos and disorder in Russia. But many people around the world want to know the truth, no matter how horrible it is, and The Daily Mail serves this demand.

  77. Kiza says:

    Do you consider yourself skillful in spinning a word and turning a phrase? How about I explain your statement above:

    “The truth about Putin and Russia has been hidden by the naive Western leaders and totally politically independent Western MSM. So here comes some Anonymous to point out the truth to all of us uninformed individuals of the World. He points us towards the UK gutter press because it is the bravest independent source ready to tell the truth hidden from us by the pro-Putin conspiracy of the Western establishment.”

    Some pigs just love wallowing in the mud.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  78. annamaria says:

    “But many people around the world want to know the truth…”
    That was a noble pronouncement.
    But here is an fact that shows the apparent lack of courage on a part of British journalists of all persuasions in relation to “unapproved” truths.
    “On Jan. 26, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held an important year-in-review press conference before an audience of about 150 journalists, including the BBC correspondent Steve Rosenberg and many other well-known representatives of mainstream Western media. ….not a single report of the event has yet appeared on major online American, French, British and German newspaper portals or television channels.”
    “Regarding a similar news blackout that followed another major Russian press briefing, the sharp-tongued Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova commented, what are all these accredited Western reporters doing in Moscow if nothing gets published abroad? Do they have some other occupation?”
    And here is an illustration of the sausage making: “Leading German Journalist Admits CIA ‘Bribed’ Him and Other Leaders of the Western ‘Press’:

  79. annamaria says:

    Not everybody joins you in adoration of the Daily Mail:
    “I still meet many people who do not understand how the Daily Mail is not just another tabloid, not just as bad as the rest of them, but instead something far more despicable and dangerous.”
    “The Daily Mail is an amoral cash cow; one that knows its readers frighteningly well, and makes money by appealing to their very worst instincts. As a Daily Mail journalist ]put it… “There is no conspiracy with the Mail. It’s just what you get when you have a newspaper run by [censored].””

  80. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    In some ways, the West’s attempt to isolate Russia has been a good thing.

    Suppose Russia is welcomed by the West. Then, Russia might be open to Western-style policies, lower its nationalist guard, and adopt western ways that are proving to be so suicidal.

    It’s been said that it was a great thing that Western European nations buried the hatchet after WWII and made peace. But, all that peace had a negative side-effect.

    Too much peace and brotherliness among European nations made all the nations overly trusting in unity and cooperation. It robbed them of their suspicions. A people that are no longer suspicious lose their survival instinct. (Corleones in THE GODFATHER had to always be suspicious and never ever trusting. To trust is to lower your guard. Trust culture is good within a nation/culture, but it should never be applied to outsiders. Corleone’s share all the secrets in the family but never with outsiders.)
    It’s like dogs raised to love and trust one another lose the keen instinct for survival.
    A wild dog or wolf is more wary, aggressive, and less cooperative, but it has powerful in self-preservation instincts. It sees everything as a potential danger. It takes no chances.
    But if you raise a bunch of dogs together and make them all be friendly-trusting-complacent, sure they get along together and that’s all very nice. But the dogs become like deer in headlight. They don’t know how to react to danger or respond to threat. They think everyone and everything is their friend. They lose all sense of danger and threat. They project their sense of safety and security on the entire world.

    And we see this in EU today.

    When Europe was more divided, competitive, and mutually suspicious, it’s true that this sometimes led to terrible wars among Europeans. But on the other hand, each nation had very powerful survival instincts. Since they feared and suspected nearby nations, why would they trust the rest of the world? Such distrust among European nations led to wars but also passion for pride and survival.

    But after WWII, all the Western European nations got along famously. They became like tamed dogs. They were nice and friendly. And cuddly.
    It was good that Europeans were no longer killing Europeans. But with all that peace and prosperity, Europeans became less like fierce attack dogs and more like cucky-wucky neutered tamed dogs.
    They went from dogs that barked and growled at strangers to dogs that were no longer afraid of strangers. Since they were protected by master USA and since they all got along happily with the other dogs, they no longer barked at strangers. They assumed that strangers are just as nice as they themselves all are with one another.

    So, instead of ‘Beware of Dog’, European dogs hold up signs ‘WELCOME TO OUR PLAYGROUND’ as millions of invaders trample into Europe.

    Both Old Europe and new EU are double-edged swords.

    Old Europe was made up of mutually suspicious, even hostile, nations. The bad side of this was was and a lot of dead people in sometimes stupid and petty wars.
    But the good side of this was that EVERY NATION has powerful survival instincts. If Poles don’t trust Germans, they are not gonna trust Africans or Muslims. If Germans don’t trust the French, they are not gonna trust the rest of the world.

    The good side of New EU is that all nations get along together and live in peace and trust one another, mostly anyway.
    But, the bad side of this is that Europeans, in having come to live with one another peacefully, have lost their killer/survival instinct and have come presume the entire world could get along just as peacefully as post-WWII Europeans do. (Europe as St. Bernard to the world.) And such naivete assumes that EU is just a part of the world and the world is just one big EU.

    So, maybe it’s a good thing that Russia is on hostile footing with the West. Sure, there is an economic price to pay, but it makes Russians suspicious and boosts their survival instinct. And that’s better to have.

    No nation trust trust the global world order dominated by the likes of Soros.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  81. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I would recommend Levitan (his Birch Grove is unforgettable)

  82. annamaria says:

    “…many people around the world want to know the truth…”
    Well, here is a case in point:
    “A lot of truth seekers who tried to stop Djukanovic [Prime Minister of Montenegro] were killed. For example, journalist Dusko Jovanovic, the editor-in-chief of Montenegrin newspaper Dan, was killed in front of his office in 2004. Mr. Ivo Pukanic, the editor of Croatian magazine National, was blown up in his car in 2008. Both of them were holding their own journalistic investigations against Djukanovic… During a long period of ruling Djukanovic and his relatives took control over main economic sectors of Montenegro.”

    The Daily Mail: “…pro-Western Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic insists Montenegro’s invitation [to NATO] is good news for the country…” “We congratulate Montenegro,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told foreign minister to loud applause at the alliance headquarters in Brussels. “This is the beginning of a very beautiful alliance…”

    • Replies: @Kiza
  83. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    You don’t think Putin’s past actions are important or relevant today? Do you believe he no longer does such things, and therefore what’s past is past and should be forgotten and we should move on? I disagree with this view, but I can understand it.

    Or are such actions acceptable in Russia? If so, again, I can understand your view and why you think this story is no big deal, but in the West and much of the world, this behavior is unacceptable.

    • Replies: @Kiza
  84. DickyGee says:

    Good stuff, Israel . . . definitely refreshing to get your point of view. There are some good independent investigative journalists out there, but not many! Keep it up! DickyGee

  85. Kiza says:

    The case of Djukanovic is just another which illustrates the NATO’s penchant for the servants/power-franchisees with a chip on the shoulder. Except that in Djukanovic’s case it is a huge timber log. No need to explain that this is because such power-franchisees are blackmailable. Exactly the same principle operates in the US domestic politics, as Ron Unz wrote himself: the US elite will never give you a chance at a political office if you have no skeleton’s in your closet (Hilary could make a good horror movie with hers).

    Djukanovic is Al Capone of Montenegro, his main business is cigarette smuggling on unimaginable scale, for the whole of the Balkans (tens of millions of smokers). He has killed opponents in the hundreds and bribed collaborators in the thousands. In a NATO democratic Nirvana, you may vote for Djukanovic or for Djukanovic. If you happen to vote for the opposition, then your vote will be stolen by this paragon of democracy and the elections will be pronounced square and fair by the Western observers. This is a standard global modus operandi of the “Western democrats”: get a crook appointed and then keep him in position through fear and bribes. Create a corrupt hierarchy, with a leader and his street enforcers (they truly beat people up if they find out they voted the wrong way).

    It is interesting to see whether Djukanovic will be ejected as a too-hot-a-potato, once he fulfills his final task of getting Montenegro into NATO, or whether he will be allowed comfortable retirement as a deserving servant of the empire.

  86. annamaria says:

    “…but in the West and much of the world, this behavior is unacceptable.”
    Your argument would be much stronger if you were defending a universal principle. Instead, because you argue that the West (the US and EU, both pure and always principled) has been offended by the impure and unprincipled President of Russian Federation, you make the reader think about such western leaders as Mr. Bush the lesser (has started a war of aggression that produced enormous ruin and slaughter in the Middle East); Mr. Blair (Chilcot inquiry is still in a process – for how long already, the seventh year?)
    Here is a short overview of the 37 victim nations victimized by the western powers after the WWII; you are welcome to refute the review:
    There is a great Shakespeare’ line that fits the situation:”The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  87. Kiza says:

    This is the final time I am bothering to reply to your empty rants about Putin. You appear to be lecturing others on which behavior is acceptable and which is not. You start from the premise that any pig swill your “elites” throw to the masses of check-to-check living wage slaves, who have no time to find out how much they are being lied to by the Western MSM and do not care, is true. There are many intelligent people in the West who see, understand and are concerned about the rottenness of their own regimes, which constantly try to re-focus domestic population onto foreign enemies. Most of all, this is because they are mismanaging their own societies. Your earnings are worth less and less every year, but it is more important that some foreign leader, some Putin, has organised every terrorist act in his own country or killed some insignificant oligarchic henchmen from his own nation in Britain. This is entertainment, just as “You Got Talent”, a distraction to forget how bad your rulers truly are. Putin is even more a bone in their throats because he has managed to return his country to normalcy just before the Western interventionist oligarchic elites almost brought it down to the level of Libya. Yes, they almost brought Russia to the level they brought Libya to, Russia would have ended up as Libya is now if Putin was not found. I cannot claim that I know what Putin did whilst working in KGB, but I am certain of what he has done since he became the leader of Russia. Yet, would it not be logical for you to worry about what George Bush the First did when he was the boss of the CIA, instead of worrying about Putin as a KGB bureaucrat? Or why are the US jobs getting exported to China, Mexico etc. Why are the illegal migrants getting into US so easily (who is making a profit on this)? Why are the US laws always set to serve the corporations at detriment of US citizens (e.g. Monstanto, Obamacare etc)? I can assure you that the Russians, and most other people of the World, worry more about their own home then about someone else’s.

  88. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Neither Blair nor Bush have been discovered to have had sex with boys. If it was discovered, there’d be public outrage. That behavior is considered unacceptable in the West. Russia may have different customs, but that does not mean that the West and other countries should not be disturbed and outraged by Putin’s past.

    • Replies: @Kiza
    , @annamaria
  89. Kiza says:

    Did I not say before that you belong in the propaganda pig pen? Blair, Bush and Clinton have killed hundreds of thousands of children, possibly around a million (Madeleine Albright: it was worth 1/2 million Iraqi children dying from Western sanctions). Even if your rubbish about Putin were true (whilst it is only the usual self-projection of the pedophilic British elites onto others; which British Lord is not a pedophile?), any person (pigs excepted) would accept that having sex with a few boys is less evil than killing hundreds of thousands of children.

  90. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The difference is that the actions of Blair, Bush, and Clinton were not intentional and deliberate. Any deaths of children were unintentional and unfortunate accidents. We don’t know all the details about what Putin did. We don’t know if he was on drugs, or drunk on vodka, or was forced at gunpoint, or if it was part of a KGB initiation ritual, or if he did it deliberately for personal pleasure, etc. All we know is that something very bad and very sick happened. The Daily Mail reported some of the truth, but because there is no free speech and no free press in Russia, it cannot investigate further.

    • Replies: @5371
  91. 5371 says:

    We don’t know all the details about what Anonymous did. We don’t know if he was on drugs, or drunk on vodka, or was forced at gunpoint, or if it was part of a CIA initiation ritual, or if he did it deliberately for personal pleasure, etc. All we know is that something very bad and very sick happened. I reported some of the truth, but because there is no free speech and no free press in the world, I cannot investigate further.

    • Replies: @Avery
  92. annamaria says:

    Sorry to say, but you are not a serious discussant. Just another JC.
    Here is for you a well-documented and very unacceptable story of coverup of massive pedophile case involving high-placed British elites. Because of the known and documented facts, there is no need in insinuations and crystal balls:
    In addition, a minor remark on your logic: Bush and Blair are called the war criminals because these two have initiated a war of aggression on a blatantly false intelligence.
    The war resulted in the hundreds of thousands of innocent deaths including a multitude of children of all ages, from teens to newborn (and in a case of Fallujah, sprinkled with depleted uranium, in the deaths or terrible genetic defects of the unborn.) In short, the world-wide outrage against Bush the lesser and Blair has been produced by the fact of illegality of the Iraq war (this is why these two are named the war criminals). The illegality means that the deaths of the multitude of children in the Middle East were not therefore the “unintentional and unfortunate accidents” (as you wrote) but a war crime:

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  93. annamaria says:

    “America’s Mideast “allies” are less eager to take on Islamic State terrorists themselves than to urge the U.S. military to do so, raising questions about whether much of today’s campaign-trail tough-guy/gal talk about Washington taking the lead really means doing the dirty work for Saudi Arabia, Israel and others.”
    “…a senior Israeli military official as saying that if Israel wanted to launch a major ground offensive against ISIS forces in southern Syria (as well as ISIS-connected militants in the Sinai Peninsula), it could wipe out the ISIS forces in three or four hours….When it comes to how most Israeli officials talk about the U.S. role, however, they “… argue that the United States… must lead the fight to roll back the Islamic State.”

  94. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The British elite pedophile ring was covered by The Daily Mail. The Daily Mail is objective and covers all cases of elite pedophilia, whether domestic or by foreign elites like Putin.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  95. @Priss Factor

    Sorry DFS but could you please explain what you mean by stating that Russia is on a hostile footing with the West? Perhaps it would be helpful if you could provide details of any hostile actions taken by Russia towards the West. I can think of quite a few instances where Western leaders have acted in a manner hostile to Russia but when it comes to Russia’s hostility to the West I’m coming up short. Thanks in anticipation.

  96. annamaria says:

    Such enthusiastic cheerleading for the Daily Mail…
    Here is a competing opinion: “The Mail is usually considered the furthest right of all UK newspapers/tabloids:”

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
  97. @Kiza

    I fail to understand why you give energy to a classic troll. But for the heck of it, here’s a few items:

    The Daily Mail is a British daily tabloid newspaper, that publishes articles promoting a climate change skeptic view. As of mid-2011, “in its recent coverage of climate change and ‘green taxes’”, “The Daily Mail has given more than five times as much space to the contrarian Global Warming Policy Foundation’s views than to any other source.”

    Following lateral threads at sourcewatch we can discover board members…

    Board member David Verey is an interesting thread to follow:

    Positions include: former Chairman, The Blackstone Group

    Blackstone Group?

    “Blackstone has developed strategic alliances with some of the largest and most sophisticated international financial institutions. In addition to AIG, they include Kissinger Associates…


    The Blackstone Group was appointed as Enron’s principal financial advisor with regard to its financial restructuring.[3] The company also advised Enron on “the Sale of its North American Power and Gas Trading Business to UBS”


    Stephen A. Schwarzman, the Chairman, CEO, and Co-founder of Blackstone Group, is a Bush Pioneer (see Bush’s Rangers) having raised at least $100,000 for Bush in the 2004 presidential election

    It’s not rocket science to ferret out the western press’ premier prostitute for pushing pseudo-science on global warming (the Daily Mail) would ultimately tie to some of the nastiest corporate personalities to be found anywhere. It follows, the Daily Mail cannot be trusted to report objectively on anything, let alone Vladimir Putin.

    • Replies: @Kiza
    , @Kiza
    , @tbraton
  98. Kiza says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Thanks Ronald, yes you are absolutely right, we should not waste time here on every troll who walks in. This is why I dropped out. Nice quick review who the board members of Daily Mail Trust are, it says everything we need to know. Could not have said it better:

    western press’ premier prostitute for pushing pseudo-science on global warming (the Daily Mail) would ultimately tie to some of the nastiest corporate personalities to be found anywhere

    . But did I call it British gutter press, which is a short form, whereas UK has the toughest competition for the bottom of the gutter.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  99. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Daily Mail publishes disturbing and disgusting stories, but that doesn’t mean those stories aren’t true. You’re committing the ad hominem logical fallacy.

  100. Kiza says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Ronald, I would like to share with you one very interesting story I heard from a friend who knows someone mid-level in the Russian establishment.

    The essence of the story is that it was Yeltsin personally who hand-picked Putin for his replacement, and even knowing what Putin would do. This would suggest that Yeltsin knew that his wife’s buddies (the network of Russian and US Jewish oligarchs) were making a fool of him, delivering him an endless supply of vodka to keep him drunk as long as possible (like a constant temptation to a known drunkard) whilst they were looting Russia. Thus, he found and chose Putin, because he knew that his wife’s buddies would run Russia into the ground if they continued ruling it after his death. It was like a final act of defiance and revenge of a sick and dying man towards those who were taking so much advantage of him during eight years of his drunken presidency.

    One fact which points towards this story is how much gratitude Putin and his team feel towards Yeltsin, whilst the Russian population is now even more against Yeltsin than before:

    A wonderful illustration of how bad things were for Russia at that time is that before the US started bombing Yugoslavia, the US guys promised Viktor Chernomyrdin Yelstin’s position, which Putin got later, in return for shafting the Serbian President Milosevic. It is not unusual that US promises the Russian Presidency to someone, then that Chernomyrdin actually believed this and did everything as he was told to do. This says that the US ziocons were in virtually complete control of Russia (most of all the Russian MSM), but they somehow let this slip into the hands of the Russian nationalists lead by Putin. Apparently, Yeltsin heard of this promise through FSB, saw what Chernomyrdin did to Milosevic and Yugoslavia, and decided to act. The rest is history.

    • Replies: @5371
    , @Ronald Thomas West
  101. 5371 says:

    The crucial time was before that, with the default of 1998 and the sacking of Nemtsov, the designated US puppet successor. At that time there was a consolidation of the political system and it was clear that whoever came next would offer a change of course.

    • Replies: @Kiza
  102. Kiza says:

    Any story of how Putin came to power is a bit of a simplification, including mine above. There is no doubt that every Russian person knew that Russia could not go on as it did under Yeltsin – those are the conditions that you mention. For example, a high school professor was earning US$4 per month under the pro-Western “reformers”. But, likewise, almost anything could have happened in the fluid situation just before and after Yeltsin’s death. Therefore, I am not sure that the change over was so well planned and structured as you imply:

    At that time there was a consolidation of the political system and it was clear that whoever came next would offer a change of course.

    A secret coup would have been much more likely as means of your “consolidation”. In any case, the US Ziocons cannot regret enough that Russia slipped out of their hot little hands. They probably have a fairly good version of the events themselves, but they are not telling it either. Somebody stuffed up big time and deserves a raspberry almost as big as Gorbachev’s, for losing the biggest and the juiciest piece of real-estate on the planet.

    But have no doubt that the dream of a replay is still alive.

    • Replies: @Avery
  103. tbraton says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    I am a little puzzled. You say the Daily Mail is “pushing the pseudo-science on global warming.” Do you mean by “pseudo science” the actual AGW (“Anthropogenic Global Warming”) or the arguments against AGW? If you think AGW is “settled science,” then why was it necessary a few years back to relabel “global warming” as “climate change”? Who has ever argued that, in the 4-1/2 billion age of planet Earth, that the climate hasn’t changed numerous times, including many times long before man became a significant factor on planet Earth, starting a few hundred years ago with the Industrial Revolution? If AGW is real, what exactly caused that massive ice sheet 1-2 miles thick that used to cover the middle of the upper mid-west of the U.S. and most of Canada to melt 10,000 years ago? I don’t think you are doing your cause any good by blindingly embracing a dubious theory like man-made global warming.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  104. Avery says:

    I am glad you pointed out Gorbachev’s role in all this.
    Sadly, developments leading to 1998 and such started much earlier, and started with Gorby.

    USSR could not go on forever under its economic model, but the sudden and catastrophic dismantling was criminal. USSR could have been unwound in a more orderly fashion without giving up so much and giving so much to the Neocon criminals.

    What kind of an idiot would believe a “promise” that NATO would not expand Eastward, if Moscow withdrew from East Europe ? Why not make sure with facts on the ground ?

    Don’t know if Gorbachev was a deep agent, or simply grossly incompetent, but his actions harmed millions of innocent former citizens of USSR.

    • Agree: Kiza
  105. @tbraton

    Ice age cycles (waxing and waning) were steady (constant.) The most recent studies suggest the development of widespread agriculture has already slowed the cycle of what is a delicate balance.

    The idea we (humans) could, on top of altering the forested state (with agriculture), unlock incredible amounts of Co2 which natural processes had buried and expect no consequence or altering the natural order, is hardly a unique form of denial…

    ^ One of Lyndon LaRouch’s groupies had actually told me the Earth’s problem was too many trees (you should track her down in Berlin, she’s actually quite attractive when discounting her mentality.)

  106. @Kiza

    That was certainly a complex circumstance of flux very much taken advantage of by the western powers. But in such multifaceted events, we (speaking of my indigenous cultural roots) have a proverb that is practically a law to live life by: “No one can know what to expect” (more literally translates ‘I don’t know anything’ but prone to misconstrued by western mentality.)

    Your story of Yeltsen/Putin typifies this native perception of hubris and its consequence (in this case of a story that could be called ‘how the west was overthrown’ by unforeseen consequence of its own acts)

  107. Philip Owen [AKA "Soarintothesky"] says:

    And the most brain dead. Russia Insider is precisely modeled on the Daily Mail. The target reader of the Daily Mail used to be a post pony owning young woman or at least, lower middle class women who wanted to be such.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  108. annamaria says:
    @Philip Owen

    Your response could be interesting for the “anonymous” (an avid supporter of the Daily Mail). The Daily Mail and Russia Insider do not belong to a set of sites that I regularly consult.

  109. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Why are there no photos of the paintings ?????? how can we see them ? too late to travel again …..

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Israel Shamir Comments via RSS