The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
We Aren’t Americans; We ARE the World (Part II)
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Asked and answered in part 1 of this inquiry was the following question:

Do we still have a country, when every single passive, non-aggressive act taken to repel people crossing into our country is considered de facto illegal, or inhumane, or in violation of international and U.S. law, or in contraventions of some hidden clause in the U.S. Constitution.”

Table a new law limiting trespass en masse, or attempt to enforce any of the many immigration laws already in the United States Code, and this is deemed by a plurality in D.C. to be problematic, if not outright diabolical.

Why do I say most in the ruling class? Because Republicans in power seldom ever fulfill their obligation to enforce America’s existing tough immigration laws.

You mean you didn’t know there were immigration laws aplenty already on the books? My point exactly. No representative tells you about the laws he or she has sworn to uphold, and hasn’t. Few representatives will fight to enforce these laws, or retaliate when judges routinely nullify immigration law.

Rather, Republicans spend their term on their knees, obsequiously apologizing, beating on breast, for the rare instances where immigration law is enforced.

Alas, most every U.S. law removing trespassers and interlopers is de facto unenforced because the multicultural noise machine—enabled by a complicit Administrative State and inept, indifferent legislators—sets the tone in this country.

Using their harshest Hitler hyperbole, the activists tell you that enforcement is not merely problematic, but Nazi-like, practically a war crime.

Here’s the nub of the matter: The noise makers want you to believe that to distinguish America from The World is immoral.


Because for America to be America, the World must be able to land in the U.S. and, forthwith, lodge claims against its citizens.

To deny these trespassers and claims-makers, first, their creature comforts, next, their welfare rights, is a violation of The World’s natural right to reside in a territory that belongs to The World.

Or, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez put it, “All people should be free to be here.”

Right now, 1 million trespassers have had the generous benefit of American due process. Consequently, they’ve received their final removal orders, their marching orders. They must now be expelled from the U.S.

But will they?

The reason they and millions like them won’t be deported has to do, once more, with the demonization of immigration law.

But what are the cultural conditions that have culminated in such immigration nihilism?

Very simply this:

U.S. laws, immigration or other natural law, no longer represent a declaration of shared values to be enforced in the name of the common good. Law now stands for “systemic racism,” or Nazism or fascism, or any of the other “isms”—nebulous political constructs all—deployed by idiots in this Age of The Idiot to trash patriotism.

As the myth-history presented to us, day-in and day-out, goes, for America to be America, The World must be able to arrive on her shores and be kept in style.

As to those “creature comforts”: Outlaws who break into this country, presumably fleeing depredations unimaginable, routinely complain about their treatment here, even sue over it.

This, as law-abiding Americans are legally neutered, powerless to exact retribution from criminally negligent law-makers and law enforcement, when the latter fail to protect citizens from a torrential influx of emboldened, lawless newcomers.

In response, what do American legislators do? They rise on their hind legs—seldom in defense of their constituents, the local yokels. But, rather, to berate the latter on behalf of the claims-makers and the larger immigration-industrial-complex.

Indeed, the country is no longer, because, for one, there is nothing to separate citizens from The World. For another, the country’s representatives are representing The World, not their constituents.


You and the flaccid, neutered state agents you pay to protect you are prohibited from telling trespassers, “You can’t come into my home.” Why? Because America, plainly put, is not your home. By their definition, America belongs to The World; it’s everybody’s home and therefore nobody’s home.

And so, just as the judges—who know not their place in the Founders’ federal scheme—rule that you can’t tell a trespasser to leave the U.S., so, similarly, refrain you must from asking a newcomer who has no English or recognizable identification documents, if he is a citizen of the no-man’s land called America.

Since illegal immigrants are here by divine right, thou shall not ask a citizenship question of these demigods on the 2020 census.

Again, why so? Because to ask a citizenship question is to distinguish between Americans and The World. And our overlords in D.C. have laid down the law: To be America, America must draw no such distinctions.

To be America, America must be a Rorschach inkblot of a place; a territory that belongs to the World and reflects the World’s aspirations.

YouTube version:

Hide 21 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. U.S. laws, immigration or other natural law, no longer represent a declaration of shared values to be enforced in the name of the common good. Law now stands for “systemic racism,” or Nazism or fascism, or any of the other “isms”—nebulous political constructs all—deployed by idiots in this Age of The Idiot to trash patriotism.

    True, but that, generally speaking, what happens when nation does not experience what many define as survival warfare, quoting one dude:

    War, a bloody and gory midwife of a nation’s cohesion, largely spared the United States

    Aggressive Canada and mighty Mexico never posed any existential threat to the United States and, because of that, matters of continental borders were easily solved by beating the shit out of nations which were not even remotely military peers of the United States. Europeans got their border-less EU (for now, it will be over soon) because they believed in globalist BS and had lost any agency in international relations under the constant threat those pesky Russian Ivans were sleeping and dreaming about how to enslave Europe–the whole thing overflows with historic irony, not to mention sarcasm. But the United States, which never paid any serious price for neglecting continental warfare, including having serious border guards troops (no, I am not talking about Border Patrol driving Jeeps and armed with small arms) has very little sense of the state border, other than going through customs in airports or waiting in line at the entry check-points . Explaining how state border should operate and be maintained, including legislatively, to any US legislator could serve as an exhibit A of exercise in futility, since those people have no clue. No American servicemen in the last 150 years died in any noticeable numbers defending the sanctity of the state border as a symbol of national sovereignty. So, it is only natural that the US doesn’t really have any culture of national borders. Yes, there is US Coast Guard which does its job moderately well but for nation which has no clue about real war explaining why those who cross the border illegally should be apprehended and persecuted (or thrown out of the country), or, as is the case with all kinds of smugglers, from weapons to drugs, be eliminated by overwhelming fire power in case they refuse to stop and begin to resist–this is not the language US “elite” is capable of speaking. US ignoring other nation’s borders is the obverse side of the United States not having experience in defending own ones.

    • Replies: @bro3886
  2. ruralguy says:

    Good point, Ilana, about how the laws are changing from protecting shared values, to laws that adopt leftist ideology. I enjoy reading Supreme Court and Appeals Court rulings. I’ve noticed that both have been ruling that citizenship is not a clearly defined concept and that it is now based more on “having any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States” or one of many other rationales such as seeking asylum, rendering enforcement nearly impossible. Like you mentioned, if there is no precise legal meaning of citizen, then none of us are really citizens. These legal theorists seem to miss that point, in their arguments about the rights of non-citizens. I guess though if there is no longer any sense of community in America, young people increasingly adopt the leftist ideology of their teachers that teaches the globe is your community and its best to embrace the third worlders streaming into this country.

  3. To care about borders, you got to be a nation. Nation means, essentially: it’s us & you are not “us”. And you don’t belong here.

    Now, there is no American nation. Period.

  4. anon[126] • Disclaimer says:

    The worst part of this awful situation is that it’s so obvious that it shouldn’t even need explaining or attentive thinking.

    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
  5. Illegal immigration is obviously a huge problem. However, it could be remedied with some strategically placed aid to various central American countries (yes it will cost — but bet anything it’ll be cheaper in the long run.)
    It’s LEGAL immigration that is a malignancy. Why? The whole gist & tenor of legal immigration seems to be to drive down the wages & bargaining power of middle class Americans. In short, Legal immigration is a sharp instrument of class warfare.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @follyofwar
  6. Hungary is standing up to the EU on exactly the same issue
    But is damned for it..
    In a recent interview President Putin raised the same point:
    ” Putin pointed to the disastrous immigration policy, spearheaded by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, of permitting untold numbers of undocumented peoples to flood the European continent. How many of those numbers will turn out to be future terrorists is anybody’s guess.”
    “When the migration problem came to a head, many people admitted that the policy of multiculturalism is not effective and that the interests of the core population should be considered,”
    “Putin went on to say that although many people in foreign countries “need our assistance,” he asked why Western leaders had failed to consider “the interests of their own population” when the number of migrants ascending upon Western Europe is “not just a handful of people but thousands or hundreds of thousands?”
    And was damned for doing so…
    “Needless to say, the response to that remark in the Western capitals, where even questioning the idea of open borders is practically akin to racism, came fast and furious.”

  7. Realist says:

    Yes, the Deep State is firmly in control. Trump and the Deep State do not care what the American people want. They know that most American people are inane fools and will believe anything. Most Americans would rather watch America’s Got Talent or Dancing With The Stars than be informed about important issues.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  8. Realist says:

    Illegal immigration is obviously a huge problem. However, it could be remedied with some strategically placed aid to various central American countries (yes it will cost — but bet anything it’ll be cheaper in the long run.)

    The most logical course of action would be…no action. The US should stay out of the affairs of foreign countries. That would be cheapest in the long run, and short run too.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  9. Corvinus says:

    “Do we still have a country”

    Of course we do.

    “Are we Americans”


    America has always experienced this backlash political milieu, a sort of quasi-civil war: in one corner are the unpretentious and besieged “authentic Americans”, and in the other corner are the hordes of the unwashed and the undesired. According to Who/Whom are contemptuous of the tastes and attitudes of the people who inhabit, or seek to inhabit, the “land of milk and honey”. When the chairman of the Republican National Committee in announced in 1992 that “We Are America” and “those other people are not”, he was providing yet another version of a century-old formula–“immigrants are the enemy of real Americans”. The problem, of course, is that today’s “authentic Americans” or “real Americans” tend not recall the trials and tribulations of their great-great grandfathers and grandmothers.

    Remember, the Irish, the Italians, the Poles…ALL had been denigrated and downgraded by nativists as not being one of them. It made little difference that those three groups were European, they were deemed “inferior” and incapable of understanding the fundamentals of representative democracy. Sure, they were “better” than blacks and browns, so long as they knew their proper place on the European ethnic hierarchy. Somehow, someway, that mentality changed. Magic dirt, indeed.

    Today, the progeny of those ancestors were labeled as being a direct threat to WASP culture–remember, they built American–are acting in a similar fashion as the nativists. But, the nation will overcome that sentiment, as it has in the past.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  10. Corvinus says:

    “They know that most American people are inane fools…”

    That would include white people. Are you suggesting that this group have a low IQ and low time preference? If yes, that mindset is anti-white. I thought you were on the “right” side.

    Praytell, what makes YOU not like them? Why are YOU not an “inane fool”

    Could it just simply be that you oppose their liberty to make their own decisions which run contrary to your preferences, that they are quite informed?

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @follyofwar
  11. imbroglio says:

    Shared values and concern for the common good. What happens when values are no longer shared and there’s no agreement as to the common good?

    For now, a borderless land in which anyone who arrives may reside as the settled population bears the cost and its constituent groups, willingly played off against one another, seek their advantage at one another’s expense.

    Sounds like a failed state.

    A member of Congress from Metro Boston says on the tube that she represents the interests of non-whites though the majority of her constituents are white. A problem? Not really. Eventually we may do away with such anachronisms as “Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan and Montana” and elect (or have appointed) nominal representatives to represent the interests of their race/gender and so on.

    AINO may continue to exist as a technical entity (America In Name Only) but, brought up to date, we may come to resemble the native tribes who preceded us on the continent.

  12. @animalogic

    How idealistic of you. When has US aid to other countries ever come without strings? The US has never given aid out of the goodness of its heart, but only to further its own ends – such as regime change when the Oligarchs don’t approve of the targeted country’s leadership. Think Smedley Butler (“War is a Racket”), who admitted he was the military enforcer for the United Fruit Company.

    I totally agree with you on the problem of Legal Immigration, though, which is ten times worse than the illegal kind. By Trump focusing on illegal immigration, its like a magician’s sleight of hand. Focus their gaze on what is seen, so that the sheeple will not think about what is unseen. After all, Trump did say that he wanted LEGAL immigration in the highest numbers this country has ever seen – apparently because the country needs more software engineers from India who will gladly work for less.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  13. @Corvinus

    Speaking as a white person of European ancestry, I agree that white people, a large proportion of them anyway, do have “low IQ” and, most certainly, a “low time preference.” Otherwise, how to explain the intractable mess we find ourselves in?

    My mindset is hardly anti-white – just realistic. It is white people, granted with a large helping hand from Jews (Hart-Celler Act of 1965), that have lead this country to ruin.

    BTW, what is the “Right Side,” anyway?

    • Replies: @animalogic
  14. Corvinus says:

    “Speaking as a white person of European ancestry, I agree that white people, a large proportion of them anyway, do have “low IQ” and, most certainly, a “low time preference.””

    How anti-white, and elitist, for you to say.

    “Otherwise, how to explain the intractable mess we find ourselves in?”

    The Jews, right?

    “BTW, what is the “Right Side,” anyway?”

    Apparently, the side that you are on.

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
  15. bro3886 says:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    Doesn’t wash. Europe is just as bad as America on this issue.

    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov
  16. @follyofwar

    Yes, agree. Sometimes I do suffer from childish idealism. Apologies.

  17. @follyofwar

    The right side is always the side of rationality & good will. (even compassion – but that takes great strength)
    (a noble Pathian was taught to ride well, shoot straight, & to tell the truth. ) It’s a good start.

  18. @Corvinus

    I’ve always liked crows. Brilliant black, brilliant blue eyes — beauty on the wing…

  19. @bro3886

    Doesn’t wash. Europe is just as bad as America on this issue.

    Modern, that is post-WW II, Europe is a political and ideological extremity of the United States. Atlanticism is a cancer.

  20. Dr. Doom says:

    The pusillanimous proposition of “civic nationalism” or paper citizenship is a falsehood, a nullity and a Big Lie. Pluralism is one thing, but blood and soil are nation. Religion ties loosely and paper opinions not at all.

    America was a noble experiment in unfettered freedom. Now only the dumb is left feeling free.

    Free dumb?

    What was ours before will be ours again. Our enemies are parasites after all.
    Let them EAT EACH OTHER.

    I’ll bring the gravy.

    You don’t just eat a rat. Its all about the sauce.

    Goose goose COOKED.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement