The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Rachel Dolezal: A Racially Abused Girl—Really
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Rachel Dolezal. Credit: Time, Inc.
Rachel Dolezal. Credit: Time, Inc.

Not so fast, Rachel Dolezal. The country is not finished with you yet. It merely got distracted. We scampered in other directions: onto the “genocidal” Confederate flag and the depraved-heart murders of Freddy Gray (black) and Kathryn Steinle. More “Black Lives Matter” riots took place. Not one “White Lives Matter” march was held. (And as one wag tweeted, Ms. Steinle didn’t sufficiently resemble Barack Obama’s daughters for him to give a damn.)

Since Dolezal dropped-off the radar, a lot has happened. It’s safe to say, however, that everyone is still barking mad, forever poised to heap scorn on her fake Afro.

Dolezal, if you’re from Deep Space, is the lily white woman who dared to “identify” as a black woman. The “Racial Industrial Complex” (a Jack Kerwick coinage) is populated with frauds, shysters, imposters, phonies, morons; black, white and 50 shades of gray.

Ms. Dolezal had been posing as all of these, teaching mambo-jumbo studies at the bush college of Eastern Washington University. Our American Idiocracy confers the respect and the authority of a pedagogue on many like her, allowing them to spread the disease to college kids and beyond.

Why not Rachel?

The Age of the Idiot sees killers exculpated, just because they kill. As the reasoning goes, if an individual has murdered, raped, or is a feckless jailhouse whore—then he or she must have been abused, neglected, racially oppressed (if black or brown); not wealthy enough, mentally ill, lacking in self-esteem. Anything but plain bad, slothful, sociopathic or parasitical. The more aberrant the crime; the more thrill-seeking, vulgar, immoral or wicked the conduct—the more elaborate, fanciful and scientifically baseless the excuse-making.

In fact, around this if B then A, backward, erroneous reasoning, an industry has arisen. It’s called psychiatry. The psychiatric endeavor—voodoo, really—is premised on the medicalization of misconduct. The reason Ms. Dolezal has been denied the benefits of this excuse-making industry is that she has encroached on black supremacy’s turf. This protected turf acts as a medieval guild or a modern trade union. In cahoots with the state, the “Racial-Industrial Complex” protects its members from competition, by limiting entry into the professionally aggrieved class.

To be black, you see, is more than a pigment; it’s an identity, a politics, an entitlement, one-upmanship, a lifetime IOY (I Own You).

Poor Rachel painted her face orange, gave herself a Sideshow Bob hairdo, and adopted the ideology of the eternally oppressed. Big deal. Most of America’s authentic poseurs are phonies who’ve never been oppressed.

Unlike most blacks, Dolezal—by the admission of the president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s Washington-State chapter—had done “quality work” to “elevate the issues of civil rights.”

“I just want to feel beautiful, and this is how I feel beautiful,” the woman said rather plaintively. Yes, Dolezal is the white face of parental and societal displacement. Why am I the only one to find her pitiful, even deserving of pity?

In America, black is beautiful.

To be black is to be more righteous, nobler; carry the heaviest historic baggage—heavier than the Holocaust—and be encouraged to perpetually and publicly pick at those suppurating sores.

To be black is to have an unwritten, implicit social contract with wider, whiter society.

To be black it to be born with an IOY; it is to be owed apologies, obsequiousness, education, and auto-exculpation for any wrongdoing.

Why can’t Rachel have some of that?

Was not Ms. Dolezal displaced for real in her parents’ affections? Rachel’s story should begin with parents Larry and Ruthanne Dolezal, who adopted four children, “three of whom were African-American while the other was from Haiti.”

Does this fashionable adoption not send a message to a vulnerable girl that she and her biological brother are too pale for their pious parents?

Spokesperson for the quasi-black Brady Bunch is Ezra Dolezal. Ezra grew up in the diversity worshiping, evangelical, Dolezal household. He now lectures his estranged sister about her shenanigans in black-face.

The Chutzpah!

The once anemic-looking, fair-skinned Rachel was raised with a real sense that she was not black enough for her parents. Why do I say “real”? Because, like Angelina Jolie, Larry and Ruthanne Dolezal kept acquiring kids more colorful than their own.

ORDER IT NOW

Kids are needy creatures. Parenting is a complex endeavor. However great their reservoirs of love, sense of fair play and goodwill—two parents do not have enough of the good stuff to spread among six kids. Mark my words: Brangelina’s beautiful, biological offspring will also one day display signs of childhood racial abuse.

Lest I be called on the carpet (or the mosaic floor, rather) for deploying the backward reasoning I previously deplored:

I am not here psychologizing Dolezal’s perplexing behavior. No need. By reality’s standards—not those unscientifically set by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–∞/eternity)—Rachel was displaced. Dolezal has thus recreated the primal scene of her childhood by becoming in adulthood—experientially, at least—blacker than her adopted brothers and sisters.

She deserves a break.

 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Blacks, Rachel Dolezal 
Hide 61 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    Great analysis.

    • Replies: @Thomas Fuller
  2. Sean says:

    No one can change their ancestry, and no one should feel be made to feel guilty for that.

  3. Tom_R says:

    THE AMERICAN PUBLIC—THE MOST STUPID GULLIBLE PUBLIC IN THE WORLD.

    Thanks for the interesting article, Madam.

    There is one main thing that the stupid idiots in the media (including conservative ones) have not mentioned before criticizing Rachel Dolezal.

    And that is, it is not her fault at all that she got the job. Because the blacks who run the NAACP gave her the job!

    She applied for the job, people interviewed her and saw her with their own eyes that she was white. Did they not ask her—why do you list your race as AA when you are white? Did they not discuss, should we hire a white candidate as our leader? Did they not ask each other—should we hire a liar who is lying about her race?

    Are they blind?

    I repeat—are the people at the NAACP blind, that they hiring people with their eyes closed? When she presided over meetings and worked there, did somebody not pick up the phone and say, “hey look, this woman, our leader, is WHITE! What’s going on here?”

    A pigmy could apply for a job as a basket ball player, fill out 10 feet height on the app, but would they not realize he is only 3 feet tall during the job interview?

    I think the news should be:

    BLIND NAACP LEADERS MISTAKENLY HIRE WHITE WOMAN THINKING SHE IS BLACK!

  4. BobInVa says:

    Thanks for this post, my thoughts exactly, though the one thing I haven’t seen reported is: how old was Rachel when her parents went on their “fashionable adoption” binge? Nor did we ever hear from her biological brother.

    • Replies: @Wyrd
    , @jon
    , @jon
  5. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    So she has encroached upon black supremacy’s turf?

    Is that anything like encroaching upon Jewish supremacy’s turf?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    what’s next?

    straight people pretending to be ‘gay’?

    gentiles pretending to be ‘jewish’?

    rich people pretending to be ‘poor’?

    legals pretending to be ‘illegal’?

    well… if Trump is pretending to be a conservative, why not?

    • Replies: @markflag
    , @elmer
  7. Wyrd says:
    @BobInVa

    Progressive churchians are the lowest of the low SJW types. I befriended a natural-born son of such a evangelical couple when we were pre-teens, and he was so grateful to have someone who cared about his own well-being as opposed to his parents’ constant demand he tend to their adopted children’s needs. These people have warped Christianity and their own children in the process.

  8. rod1963 says:

    “Was not Ms. Dolezal displaced for real in her parents’ affections? Rachel’s story should begin with parents Larry and Ruthanne Dolezal, who adopted four children, “three of whom were African-American while the other was from Haiti.”

    Does this fashionable adoption not send a message to a vulnerable girl that she and her biological brother are too pale for their pious parents?”

    Yes it does. Implicitly it tells the kids they are not loved. In a household with 4 high maintenance black child guarantees the white kids a trip to crazy land. They would never socialize correctly or develop a normal identity.

    Her stupid liberal parents in short mind f**ked their little girl into a basket case.

    It’s like that across the board with liberal parents. Take the upper middle-class white girl who shacked up with Tsarnav brothers. Or most of the white boys who converted to Islam and then tried to join up with ISIS or that loon Bergdhal. All these kids were raised by indulgent liberal parents.

    “Kids are needy creatures. Parenting is a complex endeavor. However great their reservoirs of love, sense of fair play and goodwill—two parents do not have enough of the good stuff to spread among six kids. Mark my words: Brangelina’s beautiful, biological offspring will also one day display signs of childhood racial abuse.”

    Dolezal’s parents did it for bragging rights and social credit. The same with the Hollywood glitterati who do it.

    And yes people like Angelina, Bullock and Madonna will pay for it dearly once those kids become teenagers. Angelina seems to be quite mad, in a public comment she stated she saw her three biological children as strangers compared to the 4 adoptees.

    From what I gather, the family is a total mess, they need 12 nannies to handle the 3rd worlders they adopted.

    • Replies: @Gene Su
  9. jon says:
    @BobInVa

    Thanks for this post, my thoughts exactly, though the one thing I haven’t seen reported is: how old was Rachel when her parents went on their “fashionable adoption” binge?

    There is a 15 year age gap between her and Ezra (who I think is the youngest adopted brother), so she was at least in high school.

    Nor did we ever hear from her biological brother.

    I didn’t even know she had a biological brother until this article. And the wedding picture that was in so many articles shows Rachael, her husband, her parents, her grandparents, and her four adopted siblings – everyone but him. Maybe he is estranged from the family. Parenting fail number two for the Dolezal’s I suppose.

  10. jon says:

    Was not Ms. Dolezal displaced for real in her parents’ affections? Rachel’s story should begin with parents Larry and Ruthanne Dolezal, who adopted four children, “three of whom were African-American while the other was from Haiti.”

    Does this fashionable adoption not send a message to a vulnerable girl that she and her biological brother are too pale for their pious parents?

    I’m glad to see someone finally point this out, although I’m not all that surprised that no one in the MSM wanted to focus in on this. It’s quite obvious that her parent’s decision to adopt across racial lines did permanent damage.

  11. jon says:
    @BobInVa

    how old was Rachel when her parents went on their “fashionable adoption” binge?

    I found this:

    Rachel’s mother, Ruthanne Dolezal, said Thursday by phone from her home in Northwest Montana that her daugther began to “disguise herself” in 2006 or 2007, after the family had adopted four African-American children.

    It isn’t entirely clear how soon after the adoption that Rachel starts to pass as black, but the wording does suggest that the adoption was fairly close to her transracial transition in 2006/07.

    • Replies: @Truth
  12. markflag says:
    @Anon

    You forgot about men pretending to be women and women pretending to be men

  13. @Sean

    but people are representatives of social groups, systems, nations etc. As such they of course have to care what other people did who represented the same group, even if those people are already dead. Also in a more personal way I think one family can owe something to another family

  14. Truth says:
    @jon

    “It isn’t entirely clear how soon after the adoption that Rachel starts to pass as black, but the wording does suggest that the adoption was fairly close to her transracial transition in 2006/07.”

    Yes, but a poor, impressionable young lass of 29.

  15. John Beeler says: • Website

    Absolutely. I could forgive her, just feel sorry for her, because of all that, if not for those false reports to police. The question is how far she would have gone with that. Would she have let the law go after an innocent white person, ruining him, to keep her game going? Maybe.

  16. Dwright says:

    I suppose another likely outcome from her upbringing would have becoming a white supremist or someting similar. Her choice was definitely more lucrative and socially acceptable.

  17. elmer says:

    For brevity she should be referred to as “Trans-Rachel”.

  18. J Yan says:

    I am glad to say that I am from Deep Space.

  19. Anon7 says:

    As soon as I saw that her SJW parents had adopted a whole passel of black children, I knew what had happened. Great article.

    BTW, if you didn’t follow the “mambo-jumbo” link in the article, you should do so. After my jaw dropped, I carefully scrutinized the URL: surely this must be an elaborate Onion parody?

    Nope.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  20. “when i was a child, i spake as a child, i understood as a child, i thought as a child: but when i became a man, i put away childish things.”

    • Replies: @Realist
  21. @Tom_R

    Well, in their defense, they were willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, and only really became suspicious when she kept showing up for work on time.

  22. …[S]he and her biological brother are too pale for their pious parents?
    ….
    …that she was not black enough for her parents.

    This is akin to Steve Sailer’s contention, as I understand it, that much of Barack Obama’s life can be understood as compensation for an inferiority complex do to his feeling that he is not black enough for most African-Americans.

    • Replies: @Stan D Mute
  23. Realist says:
    @pedro culito

    And you still write as a child….’I’ is upper case.

  24. I left the following comment at one of Steve Sailer’s posts a few days ago. It is relevant so please bear with me if I repeat it.

    “Do you know how a beekeeper handles a backyard invasion of a colony of African killer bees? They vacuum up the whole buzzing swarm and then separate the Queen from the rest. The Queen is destroyed. Then they introduce a benign, productive domestic Queen into the hive of killer bees. By sealing her in a wax cocoon which takes the hive of killer bees two or three days to eat through they become accustomed to her scent and accept her as their Queen. Having adopted her as their Queen they labor as usual and tend her eggs which being made up of her genetic material grow into domestic honey bees. Eventually all of the killer bees die of old age, leaving a hive of domestic bees. Like American programmers and white males in general, they train their own replacements.”

    Of course, in the case above, replacing African killer bees with domestic honey bees is an instance of Eugenics–the scientific practice of improving a species (or rather an ecosystem) through deliberate tailoring. What we see in the instance of adoption of African killer bees by the Dolezal family and Hollywood stars is Dysgenics.

    From Wiki;

    “By selecting only the most gentle, non-defensive races, beekeepers have, over centuries, eliminated the more defensive races and created a number of subspecies suitable for apiculture.”

    “Africanized bees are characterized by far greater defensiveness than European honey bees. They are more likely to attack a perceived threat and, when they do so, attack relentlessly and in larger numbers. Also, they have been known to pursue a perceived threat for a distance of well over 500 meters (1640ft). This aggressively protective behavior, termed hyper-defensive behavior by scientists, has earned them the nickname “killer bees”, an unfortunate misnomer which has caused the public to misguidedly believe that “killer bees” actually seek out and attack victims for no reason other than sheer ferocity.”

    “The venom of an Africanized bee is the same as that of a European honey bee, but since the former tends to sting in far greater numbers, the number of deaths from them are naturally greater than from European honey bees.”

    The parallels to human behavior are striking, no?

    Some thoughtful people have said that one of life’s most appealing pleasures is relaxing in one’s Garden, insulated from the hubbub of the daily grind (golf links are in effect gardens in the midst of cities which may explain why playing golf is so relaxing and why Steve Sailer is infatuated with golf course architecture, landscaping and the sociology of). To this effect, the Mediterranean villa presents an enclosing wall to the world which hems in a peaceful courtyard filled with cultivated plants, a fountain etc. Buzzing around the garden are domesticated bees fulfilling their role of pollinating desirable species. In short, the civil life is cultivated. It is the product of Eugenics.

    How can bringing in more African killer bees by the Dolezals or Hollywood stars make the Garden more cultivated? Especially when the more aggressive African killer bees attack and displace the peaceful, productive, carefully-cultivated, useful honey bee? A harmonious social relationship that is the product of centuries of thoughtful eugenics is being destroyed in a stroke by careless, clueless people suffering from inflated self pride.

  25. @Justpassingby

    This is akin to Steve Sailer’s contention, as I understand it, that much of Barack Obama’s life can be understood as compensation for an inferiority complex do to his feeling that he is not black enough for most African-Americans.

    He was rejected by chicongo’s blacks in favor of genuine black Bobby Rush. Before that, rejected by his white mother and sent to live with his white grandparents (as so many mulattoes are). Before that rejected by his African father. And the relationship with white grandparents was certainly a bit tense as he recounted in his autobiography. Don’t forget the elite white kids at Punaho School who probably didn’t embrace him the way they embraced other white peers – Barry was always just a bit “off” for them as well. His whole life he was a rejected freak. Think that may have poured gasoline on the fire lit by chicongo’s socialist set led by Bill Ayres and crew? They loved him, perhaps for the first time, and lit a blaze of narcissism now engulfing the nation.

    • Replies: @dcite
  26. Biff says:

    Another screed from Ilana that belongs in http://www.WhiteWhine.com

  27. To be black is to be more righteous, nobler; carry the heaviest historic baggage—heavier than the Holocaust—and be encouraged to perpetually and publicly pick at those suppurating sores.

    Oh dear, no baggage is heavier than the Holocaust! Nobody has more Pokemon victim points than the Jews..

    But the central thesis is correct. From the moment I saw the parents had adopted four Africans it was obvious they were the source of Rachel’s mental illness. I’ve seen white natural kids screwed up by adoption of oriental kids in my own life. Frankly, I think adopting kids into a family with natural kids is a doomed endeavor generally, but the wisdom of adopting Africans into a white home is beyond hopeless. African orphans should be sent to Africa to be adopted by native tribes in the customs that have co-evolved with the people.

  28. marylou says:
    @Wyrd

    in other words, I have to be black for mommy to love me…
    Poor kid.
    She needs to have her head xrayed so the screws can be found that are loose.

  29. elmer says:
    @Anon

    “straight people pretending to be ‘gay’?”

    Straight soldiers will claim to be gay and marry their buddies to get coveted marital and housing allowances.

  30. tbraton says:
    @Tom_R

    “She applied for the job, people interviewed her and saw her with their own eyes that she was white. ”

    Since I just got around to reading Gore Vidal’s excellent novel “Empire,” dealing with period around the Spanish-American War of 1898 (and McKinley, William Randolph Hearst, TR, and others), I am reminded of the real life character Clarence King, who is portrayed in the novel. He was a very close friend of John Hay and Henry Adams and formed part of their small group, known as the “Five of Hearts” (Hay and his wife, Adams and his wife, and King) He was a brilliant man, the first man to head the U.S. Geological Survey in 1879, and he was considered by Henry Adams the most brilliant member of the Five of Hearts. (Adams, for those who don’t know, was the author of “The Education of Henry Adams” and the novel “Democracy” and the grandson of President John Quincy Adams and the great-grandson of President John Adams, and served with his father, Charles Francis Adams in the American Embassy during our Civil War, where they succeeded in preventing England from entering the war on the side of the South. He and John Hay, appointed Secretary of State by President McKinley after the S-A War and continued in office by Teddy Roosevelt after McKinley’s assassination and the author of the “Open Door” policy in China, famously occupied adjoining houses on Lafayette Square, directly across from the White House, which was a famous center of conversation in turn of the century Washington, D.C. Their houses are now the site of the Hay-Adams Hotel.) Clarence King traveled the world a lot because of his job as a geologist and apparently never married, but, as revealed in the novel (and true in fact), he disclosed after his death in 1901 that he had secretly married a woman in New York in 1888, who bore him five children—and the woman was black. When he found this out after King died, Adams was astounded. According to Wikipedia, the white (but swarthy complexioned), blond, blue-eyed King convinced the black woman he took as his common-law wife, Ada Copeland, an ex-slave from Georgia, that he was a black Pullman porter who worked on the railroads (and was on the road a lot). He took a different name of James Todd. Shortly before he died in 1901, he moved his wife and children to Toronto and left a letter to his wife which was delivered after his death in which he revealed his dual identity and giving her the option of using either the Todd name or the King name. In effect, he had (secretly at least) “passed for black.” Ironically, his two daughters later “passed for white” and married white men while his two sons were drafted as “blacks” during WWI and served with black units. Vidal’s novel was first published in 1987, so I gather King’s story was public knowledge long before then, but NPR did a story on King’s unusual experience in 2010 based on a book telling King’s story. For a summary of that NPR show, see http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129250977

    This episode and the Rachel Dolezal episode calls to mind the famous Chico Marx line: “who are you going to believe? Me or your own eyes?”

    BTW here is what NPR had to say about King’s views, as expressed in the NPR piece:
    “For his time — and really for ours — Clarence King was “a racial radical,” says Sandweiss. In the 1880s, he imagined and wrote about an American future in which “the composite elements of American populations are melted down into one race alloy — when there are no more Irish or Germans, Negroes and English, but only Americans, belonging to one defined American race.” ”

  31. My typo: It should be “I Own You”.

    • Replies: @Wyrd
    , @tbraton
  32. @Anon7

    I too was astonished at the drivel at the link.
    I found this piece to be both funny and informative:
    “Africana studies offers many career pathways based on your areas of interest. Learn more about the opportunities and find your road to the future.”

    This is, of course, a big part of the economic stagnation of the past decades, think of the vast economic resource pissed into this hole and destroyed.

    The primary other cause is what Lush Rimblow in a rare moment of accuracy called “The Chickification of the economy.”

    Nobody makes anything any more. The Krauts don’t put up with this nonsense.

    • Replies: @Anon7
  33. Anymouse says:

    So sad, her parents and society made her hate her European self, as if being European was wrong!

    That was a crime.

    So she pretended to be African and was very successful, until they rejected her.

    Now she has an African biological child so cannot come back to our community.

    So sad Rachel, you have nowhere to go and it really isn’t all your fault.

  34. Wyrd says:
    @ilana mercer

    A Soviet commissar couldn’t have termed it better.

  35. Aurelius says:

    Maybe Rachel Dolezal deserves a break, but I can’t give her one. She didn’t just harm herself with her shenanigans. In her work for the NAACP she actively campaigned for things that harm white folks, just like any other black working in the Racism™ Industry.

  36. The applicable phrase here is “pathological altruism.”

  37. tbraton says:
    @ilana mercer

    I forgot to add my plaudits for what is a very well-written piece. Very well done.

    • Replies: @ilana mercer
  38. Jefferson says:

    Some people on the internet are saying that when Rachel Dolezal changed her look, she ended up looking more like a tanned Jewish woman rather than a Black woman.

    • Replies: @Wally
  39. Ponto says:

    Don’t agree one bit. Not sorry! Blaming the woman’s parents and brother for the woman being an asshole is taking the easy way out. The woman is mental, nothing to do with her genetic inheritance or her upbringing. Some folks just turn out that way.

    The idea that having four negro adopted siblings made the nutter feel unloved, unwanted or that black is beautiful, white is vomit is just silly. Mental disease usually starts in childhood and progresses through adolescence and adulthood. So she took no steps to help herself, and everyone thought she was eccentric and would grow out of it. Too bad!

    In the end, it is just a story about one loony. There are many more.

  40. dcite says:
    @Stan D Mute

    A person named Mia Pope talks convincing about him as being among her teen peers back in the 70s, who hung out on the beach in Hawaii. They all knew certain things about him. He was, most certainly, NOT a ladies man (or boy), and also could not tell the truth. He hung out mostly with older white men. Mother rarely in evidence. His lack of popularity had nothing to do with his race, but with his sociopathy.

  41. Anon7 says:
    @Bill Jones

    After the riots in the 1960’s two strategies were put in place to deal with unhappy black people. Black people who could not be educated were rotated between prison (“The War on Drugs”) and welfare, and those who could sit through high school and college were given government “jobs”. (An amazing percentage of black women with college degrees were given government employment in the 1970’s; it’s on the order of 75%.)

    At first, there might have been some connection with the content of the schooling and the jobs. Eventually, it became clear that the content of the “education” had nothing to do with being given a government “job”, and thus African Studies was born.

    When did it become “Africana” with an extra “a” at the end? Does that denote feminine? Or is it some sort of scholarly conceit about being accurate or “genuine” (like “Neanderthal” versus “Neandertal”)?

    Aha! From the mambo-jumbo website:

    “It is to be distinguished from African Studies as Africana Studies’ focus combines Africa and the African diaspora (which includes Afro-Latin American studies, African American studies, and Black studies) into a concept of an “African experience” or cultural ideology with an Afrocentric perspective.”

    It’s an even higher level of bullsh*t than I thought. Being black guarantees you an “A” just like being a native Spanish speaker guarantees you an “A” in college Spanish and lets you complete the language requirement with little effort.

  42. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Pretty cut and dried, she CHOSE to lie and should be charged criminally. Why haven’t we heard anything about that. Like every other family, dysfunctional comes to mind. I have no sympathy for her or anyone who does such a thing.

    • Replies: @guest
    , @jimmyriddle
  43. guest says:
    @Anonymous

    Charged criminally? What government could charge her, and with what? Please explain.

  44. @Anonymous

    Stop wielding the baboon whip of cis-racism against this poor woman.

  45. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    No, Jewish supremacy you’re not supposed to notice. And if you do notice, you’ll be publicly shamed, forced out of your employment and in many instances, imprisoned. Better to just notice the Blacks. Because obviously, it’s the Blacks that have such political and economic power.

  46. Gene Su says:

    I think this is caused by the public schools. Look at Saved by the Bell and Happy Days. Schools teach kids how to be hip as opposed to refined and educated… And who is more hip than the Negro?

  47. Wyrd says:

    Magnificate, magnification! Learning to survive!

  48. Gene Su says:
    @rod1963

    I think adopting one foreign child at most is best. 4 is too many. There are some historical cultures that have great foster care programs. The Ottoman Muslims would take Christian boys and give them to select Turkish families to turn into Janissaries. The Native Americans were good with fostering captive children. For whatever reason, the white American’s track record is nowhere near as good.

  49. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    “No one can change their ancestry, and no one should feel be made to feel guilty for that.”

    Unless of course, you happen to be white.

  50. Wally says: • Website
    @Jefferson

    Yes, the always hideous Jewfro.

    And perhaps those who hired her thought that she was a Jew and therefore were required to hire her.

  51. too many babblers here, not enough incriminating pictures.

    here

    that’s our lying “black women” in a picture given to the press by her parents

    the women is an exposed phony

    move on

    • Replies: @Hobbesian Meliorist
  52. @Wyrd

    Fanatical Christians often suffer from pathological altruism. They believe it is their Christian duty to be altruistic, but they take it to such extremes that, in the process of trying to fulfill that duty, they often harm themselves, people around them (friends, family and colleagues), and sometimes even the people they are trying to help. There is a big overlap between this version of Christianity and the supposedly secular ideology of “progressivism” (which betrays its Christian origins even while proclaiming itself to be secular).

  53. @dave chamberlin

    Under the one-drop rule, which many race activists hold dear, merely looking white is no proof of whiteness. There are “quadroons” and “octoroons” who look no less white than the pre-fake-tan-and-corkscrew-hairstyle Rachel Dolezal.

    • Replies: @tbraton
  54. tbraton says:
    @Hobbesian Meliorist

    As I posted earlier in this thread re Clarence King, the close friend of Henry Adams and John Hay who secretly married a former slave in the 1880’s and fathered five children, he was able “to pass for black” (at least with respect to his common law wife) despite having blue eyes and blond hair. After his death, his two surviving daughters “passed for white” and married white men, while his two surviving sons were drafted as “blacks” during WWI and served in black units. Back in those days, I believe there were laws on the books of various states defining “octaroons” (1/8 black blood). [Per the previously cited NPR report: “Some Southern states came up with various “solutions.” Among other things, Sandweiss notes, they passed race laws — laws that said, effectively, “If one of your eight great-grandparents is black, you are black, no matter what your skin looks like.” Paradoxically, Sandweiss says, “those laws meant to ‘fix race’ made racial designations extremely fluid. And they made it possible for a light-complexioned, blue-eyed, blond-haired man like Clarence King to claim African ancestry when he actually had none at
    all.” “]

  55. Travis says:

    Her Brother, Joshua Dolezal, is a writer and teacher

    One could learn a lot about Rachel and her upbringing by reading his lyrical coming-of-age memoir, Down from the Mountaintop chronicles a quest for belonging. Raised in northwestern Montana by Pentecostal homesteaders whose twenty-year experiment in subsistence living was closely tied to their faith. The parents were ex-hippies who decided to live off the land in Montana.

    Rachel and her brother received enough attention from their parents…they were well past childhood when the parents started to adopt children. Both Rachel and her Brother were no longer living home, as they were attending college when the last child was adopted. These adoptions were not “fashionable” 20 years ago as the author claims.

    Rachel does seem to be a sociopath… Donezal is a pathological liar. Hypocrisy, plagiarism, and a nuisance lawsuit. All sociopathic signatures. Rachel Dolezal once did not let a student participate in a class activity about race and culture because she did not appear Hispanic enough…
    Meanwhile, Dolezal’s artwork is also sparking controversy, with accusations that at least one of her paintings bearing an uncanny resemblance to a famous landscape by the artist J.M.W. Turner.

    Exactly what was it that turned Dolezal into a sociopath? We’ll probably never know. but she was most likely a sociopath before her parents started to adopt children when she was 15 years old.

  56. Discard says:

    That Mumbo-Jambo link takes you to the University of Pittsburg, not to Miss Dolezal’s Eastern Washington University.

  57. Handle53 says:
    @Tom_R

    I think it might have had something to do with her infatuation with black men, and her willingness to make them feel good (if you know what I mean).

  58. WhatEvvs [AKA "AamirKhanFan"] says:

    Perceptive article! It opened my eyes – To one degree or another, most white American kids evince these bizarre behavior patterns arising from racial abuse.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World