The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
FDA Makes Fools of Pfizer ‘Clot-Shot’ Recipients; Candace Kneecaps Caucasians
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to release the data upon which it relied to license Pfizer’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccine by the year … 2076, over the course of the next 55 years!

What this means is that the FDA has de facto classified this data—belatedly requested, via the Freedom of Information Act, by “more than 30 professors and scientists from universities including Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown.”

It also implies that the menagerie of medical and media propagandists for the Pfizer “clot shot” have not seen or studied the data on which the government relied to license the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.

If that bit of “news” doesn’t get the sheeple “thinking,” nothing will. And no, this is not the onion.

The plaintiffs pleaded the obvious when their lawyer said,

“It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than immediate disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.”

If this doesn’t tell you what the U.S. government and its bureaucracies think of The People, their rights and well-being; nothing does.

The 55-year transparency plan is Sir Humphrey Appleby funny; were it not so serious; it would tickle you pink. (Every serious student of the State is obliged to watch and worship the famed British satires about the Deep State: “Yes, Prime Minister” and “Yes, Minister.”)

Says superstar of the satire, the marvelously sardonic permanent secretary Sir Humphrey, to the PM: “Yes, Prime Minister, the 55-year timeframe to produce the Pfizer Covid vaccine data is well within the law. No need to rush, if you know what I mean [smiles deliciously]. But I’ll start the paperwork, shall I?”

To repeat: By making Pfizer’s COVID vaccine data essentially unavailable for scrutiny in their totality for decades to come—the FDA has in effect classified the data upon which it based a decision to license Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine.

A knee-capping of a different kind was delivered to an exceedingly vulnerable Caucasian America by influencer Candace Owens. To wit, Darrell Brooks is the black supremacist, who used his vehicle to mow down and murder white grannies and grandkids parading in Waukesha, Wisconsin. But if you had dared to consider the race of Brooks in a hate crime manifestly motivated by race—you were boorishly berated by Owens as “brainwashed”:

“Darrell Brooks is a scumbag murderer—his race is irrelevant. …Disagree? You’re brainwashed!”

America is now systemically and institutionally anti-white. Black-on-white hate crime is rife, but it’s invariably not reported, underreported, or if reported, masked as something other than what it really is, precisely as Owens has done—and now orders you to do. Ignore her ilk—Republicans who’re always boasting about their color-blindness and their blindness to white suffering. Your life and the lives of those you love, very plainly, depend on it.

HARD TRUTH with David Vance and yours truly debates these and other thorny issues and wishes our American Hard Truthers a happy Thanksgiving.

WATCH AND SUBSCRIBE, please: “FDA Makes Fools Of Pfizer ‘Clot-Shot’ Recipients; Candace Kneecaps Caucasians”:

Video Link


Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian think piece since 1999. She’s the author of Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Gab, YouTube & LinkedIn; banned by Facebook, and has a new Podcast

• Category: Ideology • Tags: Anti-Vaxx, Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus 
Hide 50 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. AWM says:

    “Saddle up, lock and load.”

    I can’t imagine why this thought is not universal.

    • Replies: @sally
  2. Dan Hayes says:

    It’s both sad and revealing that Tucker Carlson believes that he must utilize Candace Owens to provide coverage for his own views!

  3. Biff says:

    “Darrell Brooks is a scumbag murderer—his race is irrelevant. …Disagree? You’re brainwashed!”

    But Brooks’ actions are relevant, and they were racially motivated. It was by every definition a ‘hate crime’, but will the billionaire owned media mention that even once? Doubtful.

    Disagree? You’re brainwashed!

    • Thanks: ILANA Mercer
    • Replies: @Gordon Pratt
  4. sally says:

    The reason “Saddle up, Lock and load, is not universal is explained by at least for different logics
    1. knowledgeable concerned people have not gotten their message and into sheeple minds.
    2. the sheeple who have heard the message do not understand what it means not to have a scientific basis for the claims made by the pharmaceutical companies and the government agencies who approve things.
    3. The sheeple who have heard the message, understand that science is not a part of the reason the drugs are licensed, believe the government is using other means to approve new pharmaceuticals (so don’t bother them with facts that confound the narrative). so why should a member of the sheeple dig deeply into how a new pharmaceutical is approved with data from clinical trials? In other words, the sheeple are satisfied to be the lab rats for the pharmaceuticals no matter the numbers of critically wounded pharmaceutical product takers there are.
    4. In other words, the sheeple believe in the system advertising has made the system into a religion<=its blind faith.

    In order to get through to the sheeple the narrative is going to have to be narrowed and the content supporting the narrowed narrative simplified, and the simplified supporting facts and focused narratives are going to have get sufficient media access for the sheeple to under the data is missing, even the journal articles often cited by the media, have no published data. The system is corrupt, and the claims of benefits are without foundation, merit or evidence yet the persist as acceptable in the minds of the sheeple. .

    I have often wondered, assuming a basis is found, that maybe a lawsuit naming media, govt officials, reporting agencies and departments and pharmaceutical providers and propaganda content writers, as liable to the many vaccine injured persons. Its the lack of publicity that has suppressed sheeple response.

    There are many, many vaccine injured persons which have not found access to the media. Their horror stories and plight do not support the claims of efficiency and safety which have duped the sheeple into accepting the status quo.

    I wonder if you are familiar with

  5. meamjojo says:

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to release the data upon which it relied to license Pfizer’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccine by the year … 2076, over the course of the next 55 years!

    Where are the hackers when you need them?

  6. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Another case of a Jew telling White Euro descended Christians what to think.

    I think we’ve had enough of that.

    Go cry on your rabbi Daddy’s grave.

    • Troll: Ace
  7. BuelahMan says:

    Not a word about the jewish influencers that pave the road for Candace’s lies. We know who she serves.

  8. Renoman says:

    Another great read, thank you.

    • Thanks: ILANA Mercer
  9. KenH says:

    “Darrell Brooks is a scumbag murderer—his race is irrelevant. …Disagree? You’re brainwashed!”

    Brooks can be both a scumbag murderer and a black supremacist scumbag who desired to murder white people in retaliation for the Rittenhouse verdict. Jewish owned media outlets like MSNBC have been gaslighting the hell out of radical lefties and blacks all during the trial about how Rittenhouse’s actions weren’t clear cut self defense but an act of white supremacy and a terrible affront to BLM. So it isn’t a wonder that this damnably false anti-white narrative inspired at least one member of their brainless and hate crazed audience decided to do something about it.

    At least Tucker rightly called Brooks a black nationalist which is a true characterization of him based on his social media comments and memes shared. Even some conservative influencers on social media like Chucky Kirk and Matt Walsh are rightly calling this attack what it is and are no longer trying to downplay the black on white racial angle.

  10. Candace Owens has a deep interest in her audience of morons finding race irrelevant, because race and sex are the only reasons for her ‘success’. A white guy saying what she says would be, on his best day, an ignored commenter at Unz Review. She’s a circus act.

  11. Baxter says:

    Something I have learned to do living in a country as diverse as America is to look at what people do just as much as listening to what they say. I will suggest it is more important to look at what people do than listen to what they say. For example, where do they live, who are their (closest) friends, what are their hobbies, what civic organizations do they belong to, etc. In my experience what people say and what people do frequently doesn’t match up. This tells me a lot about that person.

    • Replies: @Ace
  12. sonofman says:

    “If that bit of “news” doesn’t get the sheeple “thinking,” nothing will.”

    Sheeple cannot think. They can only affirm whatever the narrative is (including the “race”). They won’t feel suspicion that the FDA is trying to hide something that would destroy the narrative. They have no curiosity about why there is no scientific proof of the existence of the covid-19 virus, and simultaneously, why the flu has almost disappeared. They are afraid of the results of an ineffectual test instead of embracing the symptoms of a working natural immune response.
    They can’t even stop for a moment and think, “if it’s a vaccine, why do I have to worry about the unvaccinated, if I’m protected?” Since they don’t think, they cannot comprehend that, if it doesn’t exist, this can only be a pharmaceutical industry coup made possible by government collusion and media propaganda. But the ultimate of thoughtlessness and neglect are the parents that allow their children to be biologically traumatized for absolutely no reason other than to engineer chronically debilitated human beings.

    And people who cannot think actually believe that African -American against European-American crimes are most always committed because of racial issues, even though it is proven that single parent households, low-income and poverty, and limited education are the primary reason why 3% of the African-American population commit crimes mostly against other African-Americans within their own communities.

    If America is now systemically and institutionally anti-white, it is because the majority non-thinking European-Americans can only follow a narrative (like “white suffering”).

    Candace is right. Darrell Brooks is a scumbag murderer influenced by the race narrative. Derek Chauvin was an asshole whom the narrative deemed as motivated by racism. Without the race narrative, and condemning Chauvin for being derelict in his duties as a police officer without blaming the entire institution of law enforcement, the division, the episodes of rioting and looting, and elevations to martyrdom may never have happened.

    • Replies: @lysias
  13. @meamjojo

    I am glad that the 2076 date was picked.

    I now know when it will be safe for me to take the vaccine!

    • Replies: @The Mestizo
  14. Realist says:

    America is now systemically and institutionally anti-white. Black-on-white hate crime is rife, but it’s invariably not reported, underreported, or if reported, masked as something other than what it really is, precisely as Owens has done—and now orders you to do. Ignore her ilk—Republicans who’re always boasting about their color-blindness and their blindness to white suffering.

    As I said last week Carlson is promulgating the narrative that black crime has nothing to do with race.

    Carlson feels compelled to have numerous black guests on when discussing black crime to ward off racist criticism.

    • Agree: ILANA Mercer, By-tor
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @KenH
  15. Realist says:
    @Dan Hayes

    It’s both sad and revealing that Tucker Carlson believes that he must utilize Candace Owens to provide coverage for his own views!


    • Thanks: Dan Hayes
  16. @Realist

    I had to stop watching Tucker due to his cucking….and you can be sure he knows better.

    As to the 55 year wait to see the vaccine info…..this is an open admission that the vaccines are NOT safe and effective.

    • Agree: Realist
  17. lysias says:

    If it hadn’t been Chauvin, it would have been something else. The powers that be wanted to prevent Trump’s re-election one way or another. The reaction to Floyd’s death was so prompt as to invite the speculation that the powers that be were waiting for just such an event.

    • Replies: @Ace
  18. KenH says:

    As I said last week Carlson is promulgating the narrative that black crime has nothing to do with race.

    Carlson and pretty much everyone on the right try to tell us it’s just about Democrat policies but if that’s so then he needs to explain why all of the flash mobs robbing stores in San Fran and LA are 100% black. Whites, Asians and Hispanics live under those same policies and we don’t see any of them forming groups and robbing Walgreens and now luxury stores.

    It’s even worse when blacks are only 5.5% of the population in San Fran and 9% in Los Angeles. They are the 4th largest racial group in each city yet still commit most of the crime Tucker bemoans.

    • Agree: Realist
  19. R.C. says:

    Wow! Candace, I’m THOROUGHLY disappointed.

  20. I don’t follow these things closely, but- is there a single black figure, entertainer, intellectual, journalist. … clearly stating that some or many black-on-white criminal acts are racially motivated?

    She/he need not say that black dominant culture is anti-white; nor “condemn” American blacks. Just say- I think that this particular atrocity is racially motivated. I may be wrong, but I think – it is.

    I doubt there is a single black public figure who could say this thing.

    As for Jew bashing, endemic here- Jews, or people of Jewish heritage, have said on Jewish (mis)behavior such things that would make Himmler blush with embarrassment.

  21. Exile says:

    Candace Owens has been funded and platformed to spread disinformation and sow moral doubt and confusion re: race.

    Tucker has been cozy with the U.S. GOP establishment and the Deep State his entire life. He fired Mickey Kaus from Daily Caller because Kaus was criticizing Fox News for war-porn intended to distract from immigration. Ann Coulter called him on it, as did Kaus. This was only a couple of years before his supposed heel-turn to “populism” and “anti-establishment” politics.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  22. @Justvisiting

    I disagree with your analisys. /sarc

  23. his race is irrelevant

    Not to Darrell it wasn’t!

  24. Another nail in the knee of the Vaccines as the only solution fanatics. and traitors. Great article supported by other experts that no one will ever see or hear on the U.S. establishment media.

  25. @Exile

    Whether or not what you say about Tucker Carlson is actually irrelevant. The many programs he has done can be fact checked by “honest” people and can by proved to be absolutely true. He isn’t the one doing the lying, the far left is.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
    , @Realist
    , @Exile
  26. Ace says:

    It’s interesting where the beautiful people tend to find “good schools.”

  27. Ace says:

    They were. The US bombing of Syria after bogus claims of chemical weapons use by the government in Khan Sheikhoun and Douma was that — policy in search of an excuse — and more.

    A complex question of whether such weapons were used and by whom was answered in just days. Assad was deemed responsible in both cases despite glaring problems with the data and the “investigation.” Trump, whose sappiness knew no bounds, allowed himself to be manipulated by images of the victims and a mysterious WH assessment with no one’s signature but that was on top of an internal foreign policy establishment eager to wage aggressive war on that sovereign state on behalf of our best friend in the whole world.

    Given the enormous sums the British and Americans have invested in propaganda inside Syria — including support for the grandstanding jihadi White Helmet propagandists — it’s hard not to conclude that the above two incidents were manufactured with our knowledge rather than random events of which we just happened to take advantage. Or maybe we spent millions just for posters and leaflets.

    Further proof of the perfidy of that establishment was the bogus “accidental” bombing of a Syrian government position SW of Deir ez-Zor by coalition aircraft in September 2016. The Russians called on the deconfliction hotline to call off the attack but the US colonel just happened to abandon his post at that time and the Russian alarm went unheeded resulting in the deaths of many government troops. ISIS troops immediately attacked after the attack but that is positively not to be taken as proof of US coordination with such Middle Eastern filth. Don’t even think that.

  28. This is what I always say about the vaccines to apolitical people, or even politically minded people infatuated with our global elite system.

    1. It is simply not possible that they could have done proper long term safety tests, given its release timeframe.

    2. If the vaccine works, why mandate others to take it, since you’re already protected?

    3. Why must I take an experimental (see point 1) vaccine, for a disease my demographic is at no risk from (see point 2).

    4. The mandates are unscientific. Otherwise why did we have months of being back open without a mandate?

    5. The mandates are unscientific. Otherwise why can’t you show a negative test, proving you don’t have the virus? The vaccinated can still spread covid.

    These points are logically ironclad, and easily approachable. From there you can then discuss the waves of heart problems, the mentality and ideology of our global elite, and our corporatist societal structure including media funded by the elite NGOs.

  29. Well, of course they’d want to keep the details of the greatest mass-murder in history under wraps until has fully panned out. This sounds like something ACLU might take up, but I guess funneling boatloads of cash to invading replacements is more lucrative.

    As for Candace, a tiger is always going to be a tiger.

  30. @Dr. Charles Fhandrich


    Whether or not what you say about Tucker Carlson is actually irrelevant.

    the first step, Doc.

    I enjoy watching some of the clips people post here, too. But anyone featured so prominently on network TV is compromised. If you own one of those damned things, tune in on schedule, and sit back waiting for Tucker Carlson to direct your outrage, you’re being propagandized.

  31. @Greta Handel

    Correction: Dr. Charles has moved from denial (“no!”) to dismissal (“so what?”).

  32. Realist says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    The many programs he has done can be fact checked by “honest” people and can by proved to be absolutely true.

    You are correct. But remember good propaganda has some element of truth. Carlson is a staunch hater of China and Venezuela… two of the Deep States biggest enemies, China because of its threat to U. S. hegemony, and Venezuela because it has the world’s largest deposits of oil which it nationalized…removing control from U. S. oil companies.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  33. Realist says:

    Ilana, Why do you post your articles on a blog that has such a strong anti-Jewish presence?

  34. hillaire says:

    One must chuckle…

    One of the ‘primary’ voices of white america is a black fifth columnist… (who does she really work for?)…

    Cheered on by the de-mented so called ‘conservatives’ now ravaged by late stage terminal imbecility and unalloyed evil….(who actually conserve nothing…obviously)…. she berates them as racists for noticing black supremacist violence…

    The glassy eyed heritage american conservative nods in agreement, furiously digging the hole in his burial plot..

  35. Patricus says:

    Sage advice:

    Don’t step on Superman’s cape.
    Don’t spit into the wind.
    Don’t mess around with experimental drugs.

    • LOL: meamjojo
  36. @Greta Handel

    I’m not suggesting that Carlson doesn’t accent the important points he wants to get the public to understand, shoot, the media does that every single day and more. Glossy magazines, even ones that have been apolitical, like Sports Illustrated, are now shilling for the left, who are shilling for the controlling elite. The same is true for the big newspapers. The same is true for the alphabet channels, university presses and classes and Hollywood or entertainment industry, if you will. With all of these entities serving the elites cause, they have no problem with a few people telling the truth and making money for Mr. Murdoch.

  37. @Dan Hayes

    I wouldn’t reject Candice’s contribution to the cause out of hand, just because she doesn’t always agree us dissidents. She provides a valuable black voice in opposition the Lying Scum Mainstream Media, as well as scum like Al Sharpton. On other occasions she hasn’t been afraid to go after others of her race, especially all the shiftless missing black fathers, who fail to take responsibility for fathering children out of wedlock.

    Candace’s comment that Ilana mentioned about scumbag murderer Brooks may have been taken out of context. I’d like to hear her whole response before passing judgment. (Tucker normally gives her the courtesy of finishing her pre-written rants without interruption). As the ancient proverb goes: The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    • Thanks: Dan Hayes
  38. Exile says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Disinformation is a lot more sophisticated than simply lying about what the facts are.

    If you don’t understand how many ways the truth can be misused and presented in a jaundiced fashion to support ulterior motives, you’re the perfect Fox viewer. Tucker thanks you for your support. Buy more gold coins, blood pressure meds and patriot products to MAGA.

  39. @Dan Hayes

    Tucker’s interview with RFK jnr is dyno-mite. Fauci is The Beast-or one of the menagerie.

  40. @meamjojo

    There is NOTHING to hack. That’s why it will be 55 years in the future, when humanity is extinct, that some alien moral ponerologist cum archeologist discovers that there NEVER was any ‘safety data’.

  41. @Realist

    Tucker also believes that Lee Oswald was a mad commie and the lone gunman.

    • Replies: @Realist
  42. Realist says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Tucker also believes that Lee Oswald was a mad commie and the lone gunman.

    No one can be sure what he believes…just what he advocates…the narrative he promotes.

    • Agree: Mulga Mumblebrain
  43. @Biff

    The concept of hate crime is wrong. One murder is not worse than another murder just because the murderer disliked the skin colour or ethnic origin of the victim.

    Candace Owen is right. Punish the action not the thoughts of the actor.

    • Replies: @ILANA Mercer
    , @Biff
  44. Truly, Yes Minister is an excellent Freshman course in getting a feel for the Sometimes Fued between the permanent bureaucracy and “elected” officials. I say sometimes, because the Fued takes a pause when the like-minded party is in office (to a degree, see others’ writings on the concept of The Koscher Sandwich)

    Our situation is worse in that so many Appleby’s are Jews, in America (there too, I suppose, was Sir Humphrey meant to be a Jew? )

    Above all, Yes Minister is a damned funny show.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  45. @Gordon Pratt

    Candace Owens might have been struggling mightily to express what was articulated in, “Was The Cop’s Knee On George Floyd’s Neck ‘Racism’? No!”

    For fact-finding is the essence of the law. The law is not an abstract ideal of imagined social justice, that exists to salve sensitive souls.

    If ‘racism’ looks like a felony crime, then it ought to be prosecuted as nothing but a crime and debated as such. In the case of Mr. Chauvin, a mindset of depraved indifference seems to jibe with the video.

    This is not to refute the reality of racially motivated crimes. These most certainly occur. It is only to refute the legal and ethical validity of a racist mindset in the prosecution of a crime.

    Surely, a life taken because of racial or antisemitic animus is not worth more than life lost to spousal battery or to a home invasion.

    But she failed. Miserably.

  46. @ILANA Mercer

    I remember that one!

    Ms. Mercer was trying to crawfish out of her June 4, 2020, “death by cop” take on George Floyd, in which she exalted the “determin[ation]” of “Dr. Michael Baden … [t]he nation’s foremost forensic pathologist” over the “comical” official autopsy report. (Still no mention of the complete video withheld from the public by DA Keith Ellison, or Mr. Floyd’s abuse of various drugs that seem to have contributed substantially to his death.)

    Note, too, before taking seriously her high minded pleas here about “racism” that the June 4, 2020, column was entitled “Looting Is Local — Courtesy of Leroy & Lakisha.”

    Who failed? Miserably?

  47. @ILANA Mercer

    One must be somehow cognitively, or morally, impaired NOT to have seen Chauvin’s behaviour as ‘depraved indifference’ to the suffering of, and probable harm, to, a fellow human being.

  48. @Dr. Krieger

    Even better is ‘The Thick of It’, with its depiction of Blairism in action.

  49. Biff says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    I’m just playing by their rules, and I’m pointing out the obvious that they don’t want to play fair.

  50. J1234 says:

    Great article. Thanks for the info and perspective, Ilana.

    • Thanks: ILANA Mercer
Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement