The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Continuum of Propaganda
Yale, Mizzou & Your Child's School
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The specter, on the nation’s campuses, of frightened, middle-aged white educators, mostly men, resigning in fear of a mob rising in rage against hurtful words and gestures—all constitutionally protected speech—is an organic extension of the American educational project, down to your child’s school.

If your kids are in the country’s educational gulag—primary, secondary or tertiary—however well they’re faring; they’re still being brainwashed and de-civilized. Most private schools are now bastions of progressivism, too. “Progressivism,” of course, does not imply progress.

The “justice” for which privileged youngsters on America’s coveted campuses are rioting—the right to silence and purge dissent and dissidents—they’ve imbibed in schools public and private, prior to arriving at the university.

On the University of Missouri campus, atavistic youth have joined against hurtful words, symbols and unsettling, unorthodox ideas, and for “safe spaces,” where these brave hearts can hideout from “racial microaggression.” Examples of “microaggression” are asking a black student for lessons in twerking, complimenting her weave, or simply being white.

But mostly, these minorities and their propagandized white patsies are campaigning for the unanimous acceptance of the following destructive, dangerous, often deadly, dictum:

“White racism is everywhere. White racism is permanent. White racism explains everything.”

The “systemic racism” meme you hear repeated by media, across the American campus, and preached from the White House is a function of “Critical Race Theory,” the sub-intelligent, purely theoretical, and logically fallacious construct, now creeping into American schools at every level.

As detailed in WND colleague Colin Flaherty’s “Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry,” America’s children, black, white and brown, are being taught, starting at a tender age, about “racial hostility and resentment.”

This racial hostility is said to be endemic and always and everywhere a white on black affair.

Ask your state representative and your school board about Glenn Singleton and his Pacific Educational Group’s curriculum, deceptively titled “Courageous Conversations.” The PEG poisonous program has been adopted by “hundreds of school districts across the US,” and foisted on millions of pupils, very possibly your child.

Beware; propaganda is process oriented, and an insidious process at that.

ITEM: Your cherub’s project receives an A. His work the teacher praises before the classroom. Yet, oddly, the child’s identity she will studiously conceal. This is in furtherance of the egalitarian idea, implemented, whereby no individual student is to be identified as having produced superior work to that of the collective.

“[U]nder the Singleton influence,” explains Flaherty, “the Seattle schools [have] defined individualism as a form of cultural racism and said that only whites can be racist.” Moreover, “emphasizing individualism as opposed to a more collective ideology is a form of racism,” too.

The progressive educational project carries its anti-white bias into teaching about the Orient (East) versus the Occident (West).

ITEM: A Christian boy, placed in an academically advanced study program, is tasked with submitting a project about one of three ancient civilizations: Egypt, India and Rome.

Ancient Egypt, a big hit apparently, is spoken for. The teacher, generally “white, female, liberal,” advises the boy: “Choose India. Rome is … BORING.”

What is it that this colossal ignoramus has conveyed to her student with the words “Rome is boring”? Let us unpack the meta-message (with reference to

• Christianity, first adopted and spread by the giant empire of Rome, is BORING.
• Engineering, which the Romans perfected and excelled at like no other civilization, is BORING.
• Related in tedium and utterly BORING: The ingenious construction of roads and aqueducts.
• The Greeks, an inspiration for Rome—what little boy doesn’t love Leonidas of “300”?—BORING.
• The form of government known as “republicanism,” an inspiration for the American Founding Fathers: BORING.
• The notion of equality under the law, invented by Rome and instantiated in Rome’s Twelve Tables, 449 Before Christ: BORING.
• The intrigues of Julius Caesar’s court: BORING.
• The oh-so relevant lessons of Empire and government overreach: BORING.
• Spartacus, gladiator and rebel leader against Rome: BORING.
• “Gladiators, Chariots, and the Roman Games,” the riveting stuff of kiddie video games: BORING.
• The fine art of argument and oratory: BORING.
• Masters of literature and poetry: Horace, Virgil, Ovid, Livy: BORING!
• The greatest romance in history, Antony and Cleopatra’s: not quite on the level of a Bollywood tryst.

Rome is the foundation of our Western civilization. The boorishness of telling a Christian young boy that Rome is boring conjures a skit from the “Life of Brian,” a parody by comedic genius John Cleese about Judea under Rome:

So, “What have the Romans ever done for us?” asks Reg, a Jewish rebel against Rome. “The aqueduct,” one rebel ventures. Says a second, “Sanitation, remember what the city used to be like?” A third Jewish rebel praises the roads. A fourth, the public baths. Exacerbated by the growing list of Roman improvements, rebel-in-chief Reg responds: “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”

Except that what is par for the course in your children’s’ schools is no laughing matter.

Certainly, parents ought to familiarize themselves with the politicized process of textbook and course-material selection.

In Washington State, the selection of textbooks is a highly centralized affair, arrogated to a “textbook commission,” which consists of five individuals, whose liberal, labor-union credentials are guaranteed to be unimpeachable.

Put it this way, textbook selection effected by the politburo of books will ensure that your child never ever comes away believing in the immutable truth, say, of the philosophy that animated the republic’s Founding Fathers. Or in the originalist intention of the US Constitution.


Yes, your kids will learn about the Constitution and about theories of constitutional interpretation. But so will they be inculcated in the unshaken view of originalism as a quaint notion reserved for oddballs (auntie ilana’s preference for the Anti-Federalists is tantamount to a thought crime), and that “progress” demands that the Constitution be “updated.”

Your child will be taught that eternal verities—the rights of private property and self-defense—shift with the times, when in fact truth is not relative, but both knowable and immutable (also the theme of a magnificent encyclical penned by the late Pope John Paul II).

Fact: Yale and Mizzou students are oblivious to the cherished American tenets of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion; diversity of thought, and most important: the magnificent life all people irrespective of skin color can labor to achieve in America.

These students didn’t arrive on campus with such illiberal biases. The rot didn’t start there and didn’t unfold overnight. The closing of the Millennial Minds at the University of Missouri and beyond, to yield such philosophically and ethically bereft boorishness, has happened over time. The seeds of the bizarre contagion spreading across American campuses were sown in your kids’ primary and secondary schools, public and private.

And as we speak.

Hide 40 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. D. K. says:

    “’Progressivism,’ of course, does not imply progress.”

    It most certainly does imply it. In one definitive sense, in fact, it actually denotes it: contemporary “Progressivism” is figuratively “progressive” in the very same sense in which a literal disease– say, brain cancer– often proves to be literally “progressive.”

    • Disagree: Realist
  2. Gene Su says:

    “White racism is everywhere. White racism is permanent. White racism explains everything.”

    I wrote this before and I’ll write this again. The reason why so many young white Americans believe this farcical dictum is not so much of the propaganda in our grade schools but the environment and structure.

    Let’s just say there really is a bell curve and let’s just say that blacks, in general, rank one standard deviation lower in IQ, ability (which I don’t think is the case), discipline, attitudes, and morals (which I do think is the case). The problem is that the lower portion of that bell curve is isolated in inner cities like Detroit, Newark, Bed-Stuy, etc.

    When white children enter grade school, they are far more likely to encounter underclass whites instead of blacks. These whites are disruptive in class, unwilling to learn, and sometimes engage in violence. They may not engage in it to the same degree as blacks (for now), but they engage in it far too much. White children don’t encounter underclass blacks. Middle-class blacks tend to behave more civilized. This is why so many whites in high school and college are left with the deep impression that blacks are more civilized and intelligent than blacks.

    If we want to start fixing this problem, we’re going to have to overhaul the school system.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  3. “auntie ilana’s preference for the Anti-Federalists is tantamount to a thought crime”

    Preference for the anti-Federalists is at odds with admiration for Rome, that is, if Rome were examined a bit more honestly; I notice you did not cite Tacitus criticisms of Rome’s corruption and other critical observations –

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    The anti-Federalists were certainly not into empire but rather opposed to empire’s excesses which required a certain necessary tyranny to survive, begging the question; how long did Rome’s ‘republic’ last? Pining for the anti-Federalists is like pining for Rome’s pre-dictatorship Senate. The USA you long for is a fantasy of past imagination going to Franklin’s answer when asked what had been our constitutional convention’s result; “A republic, if you can keep it.” llana, the republic wasn’t kept and had not been for a very long time. Get over it.

    More interesting myself is corrupt Christian Rome’s dysfunctional sexuality and related perversions, that’s right in line with Benedict’s administration going to great lengths to shield church pedophiles (Bergoglio is at least a bit better at cover stories in this regard.)

    ‘Out of the closet’ only makes liberals more honest, if not more preferable ; )

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @dfordoom
  4. David says:

    Did anyone beside the author say, “Choose India. Rome is … BORING?” It appears she made it up so she could get really worked up about it, like the Ask-a-Mexican guy.

    • Replies: @ilana mercer
  5. iffen says:

    Some ideas and issues are difficult to work through and doing so can make your head hurt. Some issues are simple and straightforward. Example: Who is your favorite slave revolt leader, Spartacus or Nat Turner? Why?

  6. MarkinLA says:
    @Gene Su

    Middle-class blacks tend to behave more civilized. This is why so many whites in high school and college are left with the deep impression that blacks are more civilized and intelligent than blacks.

    This is why a lot of the garbage whites in college barf up happens. Middle class white guy hears upper middle class black guy complain about all the police harassment blacks get. Upper middle class black guy talks about his relatives who are constantly being rousted by the police for no reason at all. Upper middle class black guy leaves out the part that his cousins are gang members dealing drugs.

    • Replies: @Realist
  7. nickels says:

    This country is done. It will go the way of the Bolsheviks.
    Many will deserve the death and destruction their ignorance, complacence, as well as downright treason bring them.
    Most will not.

    It is too far past the time to wake up, it is inevitable at this point.

    • Replies: @Charles Vok
  8. Wally says: • Website
    @Ronald Thomas West

    And who is that goes to great lengths to shield the overwhelming statistical facts of black dysfunctional sexual violence, massive black crime in general, and of course, the generally low black IQs?

    Yes, the finger is pointed at those like you, Ronald Thomas West. The facts are the facts.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  9. Lets stop calling it Progressivism and starting calling it what it really is, cultural marxism and its agenda always has been to destroy traditional institutions and values.

  10. @nickels

    I hate to say it but I agree with you.

  11. Realist says:

    The vast majority of college students don’t belong in college, but thanks to inordinate greed it will not change.

  12. @Wally

    Quite the reaction to cover-up of pedophiles crimes by Llana’s favorite pope. Or was it something else inspired your reply? In any case, glad I could put a bug up your butt 😀

    Here’s another fun link, should be right ‘up’ your alley:


  13. Realist says:

    There are damn few upper middle class blacks.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  14. “Your child will be taught that eternal verities—the rights of private property and self-defense—shift with the times, when in fact truth is not relative, but both knowable and immutable (also the theme of a magnificent encyclical penned by the late Pope John Paul II).”

    Oh, come on. The only “eternal verities” are the laws of physics. Private property and self-defense are both social constructs. This is not to say that they are not important and beneficial to society, but they do not spring from the laws of nature or the commands of some supernatural being

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  15. @David

    Both ITEMS in the essay are true. “Kid” in question is like family to this writer. Enough said. The article was prompted, in part, by this “close encounter.” Saying Rome is boring is so weird; too peculiar to make up. Even more peculiar is suggesting someone unknown to you is a liar. Nice.

  16. OutWest says:

    I was a bit surprised –maybe more saddened- to learn that all Advanced Placement history courses were prescribed and proscribed by a cabal in New York City. History is to be argued over not homogenized.

  17. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Paradoxically, this is the price that elite white/Jewish-dominated institutions must pay in order to maintain safe spaces away from black thugs.

    Let’s face it. Gentrified neighborhoods and colleges are mostly white(and Jewish and Asian) affairs, and there is tight police presence to keep black thugs at bay.


    Progs are supposed to love Negroes, at least in terms of what they SAY. But in terms of what they DO, prog whites/Jews create Safe Spaces away from Negroes. It’s like Hyde Park where Obama comes from. It has strong double police presence to keep the Negroes at bay. It has campus police and city police to watch the Negroes and keep the bad ones away.

    In order to hide what progs DO, they create all these policies that seems like they are devoted to providing symbolic ‘safe spaces’ for blacks and minorities. Give the token middle class Negroes in colleges what they want, and it creates the impression that colleges are ‘diverse’ places that go out of its way to keep blacks feeling safe.
    But if you look at the larger community, college policy is really to keep whites, Jews, and Asians safe from Negroes.

    It’s NYT uses a lot of space SAYING stuff about ‘inclusion’ but in league with NYers who were DOING things to stop and frisk all them Negroes and keep them in order.

    Speak ‘progressively’ and carry out ‘gentrification’.

    Appease the bleeks(black geeks) to hold back the blugs(black thugs).

  18. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Whites are rhetorically so helpess cuz they don’t control the institutions and industries that control the Narrative.

    A people need three things to survive. Control of Land. Control of Sex. Control of Narrative.
    Without land, there is no nation. There can be a nation of the heart/mind, but it’s insecure. Jews knew this feeling as nomads. You need land for real security.

    Control of Sex is also crucial. The men of a community need the respect of their women. Together, they create more of their kind for the future. But when the men lose the respect of the women of the community, the men lose confidence and become pussified and cucked. And women produce babies for other races, and children usually follow the identity of their fathers from whom they take their names. This is especially true in the US as interracism is usually black male on white female. White men are becoming like the native men of South America whose women were taken by Spanish Conquistadores. Imagine if a lot of Jewish women in Israel came to look down on Jewish men, put them down, and went with Arab men and produced Arab Muslim babies for the enemy race.

    And this will grow even more alarming in Europe in yrs to come with the massive migration of hornball Negro men from black Africa. European males are a bunch of castrated pansies, and European women are into black sports and jungle music.
    White men have lost the respect of their women for both biological and ideological reasons. Black guys whup white guys, and feminism has taught generations of white educated women that white men are evil.

    And then, there is the Control of Narrative. History either justifies or condemns a people. A people can use history to justify power and control. Or history can be used to shame, denigrate, and guilt-bait a people. Control of the past justifies power in the present.

    We see this in the US. In raw terms of material wealth and numbers, whites still have a huge advantage over blacks. Blacks have advantage in funky music and hardcore sports, but if whites wanted to unite racially and kick black ass, they could.

    But whites are totally wussy and divided. Why? Because they lost control of their Narrative. Jews fund stuff like the TV show ROOTS and 12 YRS A SLAVE.
    Jews have conflated the American South with the Nazis. Jews guilt-bait whites everywhere for ‘racism’. So, even the destruction of Detroit that was carried out by ghastly Negroes is blamed on ‘white racism’.

    Without control of past narrative, whites have no pride, no unity, no confidence, and etc. They suffer from moral paralysis or moralysis. And this is also true vis-a-vis the Jews. For some reason, all whites must feel guilty for the Holocaust forever and ever. Even when Jews overwhelmingly elect someone like Obama to the top office, even white Conservatives are groveling to Jews to win some moral credit.
    It’s like whites suffer from such a moral deficit that they must beg for moral credits from Jews and Negroes(and even homos). Of course, whites feel no moral deficit vis-a-via Muslims, which is why anti-Muslim bitching is still allowed and even encouraged(by Jews especially).

    Righteousness is the boner of morality, and whites are limp, flaccid, and impotent when it comes to black and Jews, the two people who pose the most harm to whites.
    Blacks pose physical threat, and Jews pose intellectual threat. Blacks are tougher, Jews are smarter. But whites have no moral righteousness against the two people who are most committed to destroying them.

    Because whites can’t get it up morally against Jews and Negroes, they take viagara and act all manly against Iran, Russia, and China. (Against Russia is especially sad cuz Russians are fellow whites.)

    White race now cries like a baby before Oprah and seek her approval.

    With white women like this, white men have no hope left…

    unless they finally wake up and get real.

    • Replies: @Palerider1861
    , @Anon
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Look at this. Black students say they have no use for the First Amendment.
    Progs are now bitching about Free Speech cuz it allows too much ‘hate speech’.

    Maybe the Right should fight fire with fire.

    Okay, the Right should also say END THE FIRST AMENDMENT. No more speech protection for whomever.

    The Right should only defend speech that is pro-white, pro-Western, and pro-European.

    The Right should oppose and try to ban any speech that spreads black violence, homo decadence, Jewish subversion, and etc.

    Ban all rap music for spreading racial violence.

    Ban all porn cuz it’s Jewish-run industry that uses white women like pieces of meat.

    Ban all anti-white speech because it’s hateful to the people who did most to create the modern world.

    Ban all feminist speech cuz it hates on men and creates divisiveness between white men and white women.

    Ban all homo propaganda since it spreads the lie that Bruce Jenner is a woman and the lie that fecal penetration is biologically and morally of equal value as real sexuality. It also corrupts children.

    No more Free Speech. There is now only OUR SPEECH vs THEIR SPEECH.

    And we must be for OUR SPEECH, and we need to call for banning of THEIR SPEECH.

    And we are justified in calling for this War of Speech since it is the Progs, Jews, homos, and blacks who are calling for End of Free Speech.

    Okay. The hell with Free Speech. White people should now call for banning all speech that hurts white interests from a**holes of other groups. Whites should go the Russian Route or the Turkish Route. In Russia, one cannot badmouth the Red Army of WWII. In Turkey, one cannot defame Turkishness. We need the Turkish option.

    Btw, it’s often been said that the Left went from free speech rights to hate speech policing.

    There is some truth to this in the sense that the 60s college radicals invoked free speech rights in order to do as they pleased on campuses.
    But this overlooks a very important fact. The radicals were in fact pushing for a kind of Speech of Intimidation that would shut down civil discourse/debate and enforce only their own views.
    The seeds of PC were there in the beginning of the so-called Free Speech Movement.

    Free Speech works like traffic. It needs rules and regulations. When it comes to Free Speech, there shouldn’t be any limits in what is said or conveyed. But there should be rules in HOW it is said.
    Likewise, when it comes to traffic and travel, there shouldn’t be limits on where we want to go. But there has to be rules on how we get there. We must obey traffic signals. We must travel at certain speeds in certain places. We must obey the rules; that goes for each and every driver.
    Free Travel doesn’t mean everyone gets to ride like a maniac as in ROAD WARRIOR or STAGECOACH. That be like post-apocalyptic scenario or like cowboys and Indians chasing/shooting one another. A person who breaks all traffic rules in the name of Free Travel is messing up the true meaning and process of Free Travel for everyone else.

    Free Speech works the same way. We should be able to express any view, but there has to be rules of discourse, of agreed-upon manners, rational methodology, shared principles of logic and honesty, and etc.
    Academia must uphold these standards. Academia should allow the pursuit of any truth or idea, but it has to uphold the proper processes of research, debate, discourse, and discussion.

    The Free Speech Movement threw a monkey wrench into academic standards. It was about the freedom of students to be obnoxious, disruptive, intimidating, thuggish, and impatient without any regard to proper process of discourse whatsoever. Their idea of speech was taking over spaces and screaming and demanding stuff right away OR ELSE. These students on occasion even occupied buildings and even held deans hostage. It was less about Free Speech than about Fright Shout.
    They were unwilling to sit down and argue their points with mutual respect shown to the other side that disagreed. They simply wanted to scream and shout until the other side backed down out of fear. It was Mob Radicalism.

    And it is this mentality that has taken over American campuses.

    And look at today’s debating styles. Blacks need not play by agreed-upon methodologies. They merely need to shout, dance, strut, rap, holler, woller, and act like looney apes. Even Fred G. Sanford and Aunt Esther had more dignity.

    It’s like sports. It would be pure barbarism UNLESS there are agreed-upon rules and do’s and don’ts. Otherwise, boxing matches will turn into kick-in-groin and gouge-out-eyes contests. Everyone will be biting, kicking, and tearing off limbs in football. There has to be sportsmanship. A boxer is free to do as he pleases WITHIN established rules that goes for both boxers. A boxer who kicks the opponent in the groin in the name of ‘free sports’ is missing the point.

    Jews and blacks are not big on sportsmanship, a sense of honor rooted in aristocraticism of Europeans. Jews love to transgress and subvert, and blacks love to jive and ugabuga holler.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  20. tbraton says:

    I Googled Glen Singleton and found he started PEG in 1992, so I don’t know how much he affected the educational system by the mid-90’s, but I had an experience in 1996 that showed me that education wasn’t what it used to be back in the early 60’s, when I was in high school. I had to return to Washington, D.C. to attend a family funeral, my first trip back since moving to Florida in 1989. I became reacquainted with my then 15-year old niece, a very intelligent young lady who did well in school. Since she and her parents lived in McLean, Virginia, one of the most up-scale neighborhoods of D.C., you would have to assume the public schools would be of fairly high caliber. Assured by her mother that she had an avid interest in history, I asked my niece one day, out of the blue, where Western Civilization had its beginning. She drew a complete blank and had no idea. Back in the 8th grade in D.C. public schools, I took my first survey course in world history (most of which stuck to me, so that my subsequent education merely filled in the details), and we were taught that Western Civilization had its beginnings with the ancient Greeks, who produced many of the things we consider the foundation of Western Civilization. Somewhere along the line, someone before Glen Singleton had made the PC determination that stating the truth about the ancient Greeks might give students from other civilizations an inferiority complex (or something along those lines).

    BTW am I to assume that Glen Singleton is Black, since he was described as being born in Baltimore and attending public schools there? If so, maybe he hung out with TN Coates.

  21. aeolius says:

    I recommend reading an analysis of how mobbing of a speech impaired nerdy student ended up in a campus massacre. What was true in 2005 is magnified today.

    I think the term “mobbing” is exactly correct in describing what is accepted as good academic practice today I see the roots of this mobbing in the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearing. . Where the rather nerdy and IIRC recently divorced Thomas was mobbed for making a rather pathetic pass at an assistant. That Anita Hill became successful is undoubted. How much she deserved it and how much was a result of the hearing I cannot judge.

    Reading an older text I saw reference to the Seven Deadly sins. It occurred to me that our economic system built on continuous consumerism now praises each of the deadly sins in the advertising needed to promote this consumerism. Check it out I did. Watch TV Ads and have a list of the seven Deadly Sins. Keep score as these behaviors are used as motivators to spend.
    And in the group-think that is behind mob-action Individualism is an impediment to consumer society. Individualism is the enemy. Mob rule is at hand.
    And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

  22. Brilliantly composed link on logical fallacies. Curious that almost all if not all of the fallacy examples are stupid things selected people on the American right, or just traditionally minded Americans defined by progressive stereotypes, might believe.

    Case in point, if I were to generalize that women are more emotional than men, full stop, I might well be accused of having too small a sample size. And I myself have known a few hysterically emotional Ray Barone type men and more than a few stone-cold calculating women. Not to mention that there is also an ancient stereotype of the stoic older woman, in every culture including American, that has to be taken into account. But the original stereotype of the emotional woman isn’t as laughable as all that- who has not been bombarded with their nonsense to the point of saturation before the age of 25 in this culture?

    • Replies: @OutWest
  23. OutWest says:
    @random observer

    Lately it appears that young people are of the (over)emotional bent. When need be women can be as cool and reliable as necessary.

  24. MarkinLA says:

    Yes there are but the 4 or 5 in a major college represent the entirety of middle class white experience with blacks.

  25. @Priss Factor

    You miss the blindingly obvious point. “Free Speech” would not be an issue in a private institution, it is the insertion of the state via its funds that causes the problem.

  26. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Ronald Thomas West

    More interesting myself is corrupt Christian Rome’s dysfunctional sexuality and related perversions.

    Of course there was none of that in pagan Rome was there?

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  27. Leftist conservative [AKA "radical_centrist"] says: • Website

    well, FINALLY an article on a dissident Right site deals directly with the issue and mechanism that is at the very heart and core of anti-white multiculturalism.

    But this article, although it goes where no other Dissident Right article does, it is yet another excellent example of the ignorance, naivete and propaganda-bound thinking that dominates both sides of the grassroots political scene in america.

    Ok, you got the general idea that anti-white multiculturalism starts in the early educational system of america. Thank goodness for small favors. Now let’s uncover some general principles that we can use to move forward. So you did not do such, I will have to do it for you.

    here we go:

    1. When children are raised up a certain way, they will not depart from that way as adults. That general idea is in the bible. Ancient folk wisdom. And the elite know that. You don’t. But they do. It’s important to understand this very important principle. Read it again. Reading things twice is something you really need to do. Now, you might say, “aw, heck, errybody know dat already!” No, that’s not the way I operate. I write down general principles and I write them plainly. I proceed from there by using these general principles to explain how things work. That’s how I operate. Now, what’s the general principle of this first item? Say it aloud. Good. I knew you could do it.

    2. White race guilt seeds are planted in young and impressionable minds and harvested decades later. When you start them out young on white race guilt, you can use that guilt decades later to manufacture consent for third world mass immigration. Anti-white multiculturalist propaganda is the seed. White race guilt is the crop. The mill that harvests and uses that crop is Capitalism.

    3. White race guilt makes the rich richer. Money is behind everything. It always was and always will be. Diversity is strength…for those at the top. Propaganda bears fruit as white race guilt. White race guilt enables diversity. Diversity facilitates wealth growth. Follow the money.

    4. It’s not a conspiracy, but an ecosystem. Follow history. Look at class subcultures. Look at the motivations for class groupings. Labor wants less competition in the marketplace for labor. Capital wants more competition for labor. Look at how academia started and grew. Yale, Harvard. These were at the beginning bastions of the upper class. They began centuries ago here in America. And they began as institutions of the upper class. Capital. So naturally these upper division educational entities took on the subcultures, the attitudes, the motivations of the upper class. Naturally. And just what ARE the subcultures, the attitudes, the motivations of the upper class? Consider your typical member of the upper class, or even the upper middle class, over 200 years ago. Maybe this person or the persons in that family were wealthy industrialists in the urban northeast. They hire servants. They want to pay less for servants, not more. They hire workers. They want to pay less for workers, not more. So the workers in that area seek to minimize competition from workers different from themselves. The workers want to restrict supply and drive up wages. So they stop blacks from working there. The workers seek to use the government to help raise wages. The wealthy industrialists fight to open up labor markets and lower wages. Do you see the nexus of this social conflict? I really hope you do.

    Now, the child of that wealthy family goes to Harvard in the 18th century, and becomes a professor there. The professors at these institutions are generally of the upper class. And they carry with them the sensibilities and subculture of the upper class. They like competition for labor among competing races. Do you see how it all started now?

    The wealthy industrialist wants to give a donation to Harvard. He wants to fund writing and research at that school. What sort of professor is most likely to be rewarded with a grant from the upper class, a professor who thinks racial integration in the workplace is good, or a professor who thinks it is bad?

    The sensibilities and subculture of the upper class are thus passed along like cultural DNA down through the centuries. This same dynamic repeats itself over time. These elite ivy league institutions then rose to become dominant ideology dissemination machines in america. They mold and shape our educational curriculum. Please tell you see how this is an ecosystem and not a conspiracy.

    5. Propaganda-bound thinking is poison, and you must rid yourself of it. Here is a quote from the article above:

    Yes, your kids will learn about the Constitution and about theories of constitutional interpretation. But so will they be inculcated in the unshaken view of originalism as a quaint notion reserved for oddballs (auntie ilana’s preference for the Anti-Federalists is tantamount to a thought crime), and that “progress” demands that the Constitution be “updated.”

    Sigh. You fight against the anti-white multiculturalism of the elites on one hand, and then you willingly take their propaganda into your brain on the other hand. We are taught to worship the constitution in america. Listen to me: that ain’t no accident or coincidence. The constitution is a tool of the elite. It steals democracy from the white working class majority. That’s not a good thing–that’s a bad thing. In fact the mass immigration you hate is only possible BECAUSE of the constitution. Sigh. You cannot even hear me. The propaganda of your elite masters will not allow my ideas to gain purchase on the rocky soil of your brain. Tis a pity….Educate yourself. Read Madison’s federalist papers, his notes on the convention, and his divide et impera letter. The founding fathers were not on our side. They were rich, and they were on the side of the rich. Big surprise.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  28. @dfordoom

    The difference being “Pagan” Rome was open about it, “Christian” Rome pushed it into the closet. All your observation does is to underline the hypocrisy of Christians.

  29. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    What to make of this?

    And how do Jewish Liberals deal with this?

    Most American Jews are Liberals and they support Israel… but that is becoming less fashionable.

    Jews got a lot of mileage out of creating Jewish-black alliance.

    If that cracks and if blacks come out for BDS in a big way, that will be a huge blow to Jews.

    Is that why Jews have created this Jewish-Homo alliance in case that happens?

    It’s unlikely homos and trannies will ever be pro-Arab or pro-Islamic since the Middle East isn’t into the tootsy-frootsy stuff.

  30. @Adolf Verloc

    Actually, private property is a direct consequence of the kind of nature that beings such as us possess. We are spacial entities and existence for us implies the occupation of space. A place to call one’s own, to live in and survive off, and to defend from encroachment by others, are the ontological foundations of private property. Self-defense is a similar and related concept, but it is even more primary insofar as every hylomorphic soul maintains itself in existence as a matter of course. And yes, since these are the principles on which God founded the created order, one can certainly say that they issue from the will of a divine being.

    It simply boggles the mind that anybody could assert that private property and self-defense are “social constructs.”

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  31. @Intelligent Dasein

    We are spacial entities and existence for us implies the occupation of space. A place to call one’s own, to live in and survive off, and to defend from encroachment by others, are the ontological foundations of private property

    Well, isn’t that ‘special’ (as in ‘short bus’ special)

    “Private property” is a handed down from feudalism dude. It’s like you were never out of feudal Europe to see other social constructs, like entire societies where there was no concept of individual ownership of land (for instance in the Native American tribes where private land ownership is a value imposed by acts of congress.)

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  32. Hibernian says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    “like entire societies where there was no concept of individual ownership of land (for instance in the Native American tribes where private land ownership is a value imposed by acts of congress.)”

    Michael Medved debunked the notion that Indians didn’t believe in land ownership.

  33. Hibernian says:
    @Leftist conservative

    You make a lot of good points, but I’d add that there’s a further stage of development where the rich have enough and/or are somewhat bored with money and seek to trade it for power, not just to make more money, but to pursue other interests, among which are sexual freedom and also the sheer joy of instructing others on how to live their lives. This stage leads to the breakdown of Christian morality; partial birth abortion, homosexual marriage, endless wars which serve the economic interests only of defense contractors, and other horrors.

  34. @Hibernian

    Medved is a pop culture revisionist. Here’s the real story:

    ^ 35 years life with Blackfeet Indians. Medved never lived there

  35. @Hibernian

    ps, I suppose Medved is so smart, informed and right, his BS line is why the Blackfeet leadership insisted there be no lands allotted to individuals in the treaty of 1895 (so-callled ‘Grinnell Agreement), the chiefs insisting on all Blackfeet lands held in common as communal grazing and timber (an agreement over-ruled by Congress with an act assigning land to individuals)

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  36. @Priss Factor

    You have nailed it, sir!

    White Americans lost all moral authority when they surrendered to the civil rights legislation in the sixties, and now are tossed about as a rudderless ship on a stormy sea …

    The neoBolsheviks have successfully used the Negro as an effective weapon to pound the confused and clueless White people into submission (close encounters of the worst kind), and they are busy rearranging history to justify the present.

    Will the WASP find his sting in time to save the species, or all we destined to become the mongrel race envisioned in the wet dreams of the Zionist deviants?

    We know from physics that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction — this applies even in the realm of politics, as any serious student of history can attest.

    Once the proverbial dam breaks, there will be quite a few people swimming for their lives!

  37. Hibernian says:
    @Ronald Thomas West

    Medved was speaking of Indians in colonial New England.

    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
  38. @Hibernian

    I think you just admitted there are other ‘social constructs’ than private property – if you follow the thread to the comment I had originally in turn commented on (irrespective of whether Medved was correct concerning the New England Indians, I doubt he was)

  39. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Is Trump a Trollitician?

  40. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    The control of the women is probably the most important. Without women, confidence is destroyed. I grew up thinking women would never go for thuggy, stupid, barbaric blacks and in in the most disturbing revelation I’ve had over the past 3 years I realise it is literally everywhere. Its all over the media. All the top white women do it – models, actresses, singers, etc. Doesn’t matter fat/thin, liberal/con, educated/thrashy, girl next door/porn star. ALL girls go for it. They love it.

    If white men act more masculine it might help a bit, but blacks have athletic genetic superiority and select against civilised drones. They are hyper masculine. The same way men of all races view blonde white women as the ideal, so women of all races (secretly, though) view blacks as the physical ideal.

    Blacks also continue breeding with black women as well.

    Ironic, isn’t it? The most advanced race, gets bred out by the least. The future of humanity is basically Detroit.

    Even the jewish women love blacks too.

    Haha….ha….ohhh no.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?