Angela Merkel, elected for life, or for what seems like an eternity, squints at ordinary Germans from behind the parapets of her usurped authority. The German chancellor has signaled her express intention to foist a new identity on the German people, whether they like it or not, and without the broad consent of her citizens (or subjects). This Merkel has done by absorbing “an unprecedented influx of immigrants who will fundamentally change the country.”
The quest to engineer a single European identity is at the heart of the European refugee crisis. (That, and the foreign policy of George W Bush, Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton, who elected to pulverize Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan and thus destabilized the region.) “It remains unmistakably true,” wrote British patriot and classical liberal philosopher David Conway, that “from its postwar beginnings to the present, the principal advocates and architects of European union have been uniformly animated by collectivist objectives that are deeply anti-liberal in spirit and form.”
Indeed, her tyrannical power to overthrow the German people and import another in their place, Merkel derives from the EU Constitution. To wit, “The EU already has rights to legislate over external trade and customs policy, the internal market, the monetary policy of countries in the Eurozone, agriculture and fisheries, many areas of domestic law including the environment and health and safety at work,” as has the supra-state extended its rights into what it calls “justice policy,” especially “asylum and immigration.”
This illiberal impetus has allowed the like-minded Merkel, operating with legal imprimatur from Brussels, to assume the authority once reserved to the sovereign people of Germany. Were it not for the rigid controls the EU exerts over its satellite states—each European member country would be free to respond to the (mostly) Muslim influx in a manner consistent with the wishes of their citizens, and not those of the Bismarckian Bureaucracy, with which Merkel identifies, and its many crooked beneficiaries.
To quote the words of another patriot, American southerner Clyde Wilson, PhD., “True union is a process of consent, not of conquest.”
It’s a little late in the game, but the shell-shocked German giant is awakening from its oppressive conformity. German activists have pursued charges of treason against Chancellor Merkel. The “citizen’s initiative” entails writing letters with legal standing to the chancellor and her prosecutors, accusing this cabal of “using mass migration to change the German Republic.” The “petitioners claimed the right under Article 20 of the German Constitution ‘to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order, if no other remedy is available’ in order to ‘safeguard our identity.’”
For their part, the patriots of the Freedom Party of Austria have been forced to resort to legal technicalities to try and halt their government’s resolve to swamp the people of Austria.
Ingeniously, as tracked by the Breitbart News Network, FPÖ leader Heinz Christian Strache has charged the Austrian state prosecutor for what amounts to human trafficking. Strache has put said prosecutor “on notice for ‘breaches of the law,’” specifically, for a “willful failure to enforce the Policing of Aliens act ,” by transporting “hundreds of thousands of people” across the border into Austria in “an uncontrolled manner,” “since early September,” in effect acting as people smuggler in chief.
The Merkel Media (Der Spiegel, in this case), in the mold of their American friends across the pond, has glibly asserted that the chancellor’s “historic decision” to throw open Germany’s borders to armies of predominantly Muslim refugees “was morally unassailable.”
If the chancellor were using her privately owned land on which to accommodate these refugees, and her own funds to transport and sustain them; and provided she prevented her charges from venturing onto public property or accessing taxpayer-funded resources—Merkel’s plot to swamp Germany with indigent illegal aliens would indeed be moral.
But this is not the case. Moreover, when a government orchestrates the unfettered movement of people into a state in which the native population’s rights to property, free association and self-defense are already heavily circumscribed by the same authority—that government is guilty of unadulterated social engineering, and worse.
Judging from her treacherous conduct, Merkel’s fellow-feelings reside exclusively with the refugees she intends to import by the millions. Her sympathies do not extend to the people at whose pleasure she serves and to whom she owes her flinty heart.
Angela Merkel is thus not unimpeachably moral, as Der Spiegel claimed; she is plain impeachable.
Germans must dethrone Angela Merkel before this dictator re-elects another people in their place and renders them aliens in their homelands.