RSS
Many are the strictures placed on what can be said and what can’t be said in matters sexual. The anatomy of breastfeeding, naturally, is no longer discussed, for a little digging – a wee-bit of knowledge – would reveal that only biological females can breastfeed successfully, by which I mean, sustain the infant so that it grows and develops on a diet of breast milk. Having breastfed my own daughter successfully until she rejected me (at 9 months), I know.
In any event, a member of the sexually exotic community who claims no longer to be woman cannot sustain an infant through breastfeeding because “he” doesn’t produce breast milk, having had the mammary glands removed. What then is the purpose of such showy displays of “chest-feeding”?
If it is not for the purpose of sustenance, then unsuccessful breastfeeding by a transgendered individual becomes merely an experience, even a production, in furtherance of that individual’s ego-bound gender- and sexual fulfillment.
And worse: I suggest that, in breastfeeding, sexually exotic individuals are often engaged in indecent exposure or some form of sexually charged exhibitionism, if in public. In my day, we breastfed in private and were modest about it. No one feels comfortable around a woman – much less a “man” – who insists that his or her mammary glands are not sexual object too, foisting them on bashful company.
Is this man-woman, then, engaged in the “natural” act of breastfeeding, or is this something far more sinister like a sexual experience? Is this not tantamount to titillating oneself, using the baby to get-off?
Since the deviant described in the article and discussed in the podcast “Bearded Men Breast Feeding In Public: Paternal Or Kinky?” is not sustaining the infant – is not a successful breast-feeder, as the well is dry – and since, by self-admission, the person’s main project is his/her gender identity, I suggest this character is deriving unacknowledged sexual pleasure from fixing a child on to his secondary sexual organs.
The baby here is a prop. The breast feeding is near-sexual. And a society of deviants is sanctioning onanism with an infant: A grown man here is likely using an infant to pleasure himself. An infant has no agency, hence onanism.
***
A reader at the Unz Review asserted that women, too, get aroused during legitimate breastfeeding. Ridiculous. And, if so, disgusting distaff! Put a lid on it. Curb yourself, will you?
What I remember of the breastfeeding experience is a mother-baby cocoon, with baby occasionally taking a break (these gender-appropriators forget that a baby nurses to survive, sate hunger, grow) to smile, play with my hair, burp. This is a much better formula for mother-child bonding than baby formula.
Wrote another: “That is one of the sweetest descriptions of the mother and child bonding experience I’ve ever read. Nothing prurient at all. Just love. The hair part got me.”
WATCH “Hard Truth,” “Bearded Men Breast Feeding In Public: Paternal Or Kinky?”
SUBSCRIBE here to support our truth telling and get notice of new “Hard Truth” content
Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian think piece since 1999. She’s the author of Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Gab, Gettr YouTube & LinkedIn; banned by Facebook, and has a new video-podcast.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
You have got to be kidding!
How exactly are we supposed to feed in private when most businesses don’t provide a place for nursing? If you want to get offended by public breastfeeding at Ikea, where appropriate, comfortable accommodations are provided, fine. Otherwise, if you’re going to be aggravated, be aggravated with businesses, not mothers feeding their babies!
All that said, yes, trying to nurse a baby when you’ve had your mammary glands is pathetic and stupid, though I don’t think it’s anything sexual.
And while I’m at it, some babies don’t like having their heads covered. One of mine, flicked off the blanket every. single. time!
It is truly perverse that in a society so determined not to be prudish, feeding your baby in public is considered some sort of faux pas. It’s absurd!
That is some sick shit, punishment of the infant, I suppose, for escaping death by abortion an hour before birth.
But hey, not to worry! The covid shots plus a myriad of other vaccines oughta do it in, or at least autism-ize it. Besides, if the jabbed mother breastfeeds it, that’ll do plenty of damage on its own. And if that doesn’t happen, it’ll just have to be starved with an infant formula shortage. Plus, one of Gates’ genetically modified mosquitoes might get to it.
If the pesky runt runs that gauntlet, then the libraries and schools will just have to psychologically bludgeon the hell out of it with Satanic tranny story-times and gender confusion classes until it agrees to have its sexual organs removed and damaging hormones injected.
Any useless eaters surviving all that will simply need to be propagandized relentlessly by the proper authorities to numb any functioning neurons, which in any case will have been rerouted by an interface chip to its Metaverse goggles.
So relax, cheer up, for your own good–or else!
Good article Ilana. A transexual breast feeding in public is exhibitionism & vanity. [any sexual implications are too appalling to think about].
All of this public media reported deviancy has the purpose of forcing public acceptance of these freaks without comment. Any commenter is considered to be a fill-in-the-blank phobic, subject to public shaming and shunning, probably at risk of losing one’s job or position in life. This academically driven nonsense cannot last. The children who have been led down this path are doomed to failure, unable to function in the real world.
Pretty sure, like abortion, breast feeding males are just another Jewish sacrament.
Why is it that jews (like Magnus Hirschfeld or any of the current TV producers) push this ideology more than anyone else?
This academically driven nonsense cannot last.
Correct. The only reason it’s lasted thus far is that the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency has given the Great Satan the ability to project force beyond the wildest dreams of any government before. However, this will go by the wayside quickly with the advent of the petroyuan.
Good comment, Rosie. Some time ago, I had a “debate” with Nicholas Stix. He thinks it’s shameful (or something) to nurse your baby in public. So many men supported his viewpoint. They think you should lug bottles along every time you go out with your babies. Or hide out in a bathroom stall while feeding them their proper food. Sure, arses – YOU try eating your meal in a place where others are grunting and pharting. SMH.
My God! Suppose some stranger sees a wee bit of your breast as you are latching or detaching the child. Horrors!
Agreed.
The only bright side to the coming global depression and possible world war is that most of these fantasists will perish while identifying dirt as food.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10110901/Mother-breastfeeds-five-six-year-old-sons.html
sexperv entitlement is part of the larger
Kosher Culture of Death:
abortion, porn, sexperv, miscegnation, and Judeo-“feminism”.
all aimed at killing White family formation and birthrate.
And of course, if you do bottle-feed when you’re out with your baby, your body doesn’t know your baby doesn’t need that milk! It’s uncomfortable to go around with engorged breasts.
I wish people like Mr. Stix would try not to be so judgmental about things they know nothing of.
Five or six is a bit much for me, but honestly I completely agree with her about breastfeeding making parenting easier. Mr. Rosie loved being able to go pretty much anywhere and know that, if all else fails, I had a fool-proof way to quiet down our toddlers in case of a melt down. People should really be careful what they wish for.
I wonder if she is doing it to make parenting easier or more because she knows it freaks out the normies. When I have seen a woman breast feeding a five or six year old in public inevitably she had some bizarre inhuman RGB value hair color and double digit tatoos+piercings.
Freedom!
This is because a nation confused about about everything is easier to control, hence, all the fuss made about covid being worse than the bubonic plague, TB and cancer put together, gender bending, sex changes, pedophilia and constant anti-Russian propaganda.
I recall reading in a mothering magazine where a Brazilian supermodel (living here) on hearing there was a fuss about nursing an older child, said, “I was nursed til I was five years old…what’s the big deal.” Her words.
Yes, this is Jewish thinking, whether by a Jew, or, by a non-Jew who has, as the psych docs say, “mirrored” it.
Maria, dumping Zukerman, in Philip Roth’s “The Counterlife”:
“Dissension and contentiousness put a spring in your heel.”
Contentiousness becomes a habit of thought, a pattern of speech, a philosophy. Oppositional, contrarian. Breast-feeding males is the metaphor, but the endpoint of this kind of mental life is a nuclear ash pile.
I think you’re off-topic.
Living here? Where?
For what it’s worth, Ilana Mercer (the poster) IS Jewish.
Like my own (female) wife (married to a man, me).
I’m thinking that people don’t care about you or you breast-feeding, they are repelled by your LOOK AT ME attitude about the whole business
I don’t know exactly where in the US she was living at the time she made that statement. It has been some years since I read about her. Sorry I can’t be more helpful.
Well, isn’t this interesting. You have no reason whatsoever to think Liza has a “LOOK AT ME attitude about anything,” you just assume she does. Therein precisely lies the problem.
I don’t see any ‘problem’ but the way you insist upon yourself might be something to examine, though.
If one farts at the table, it doesn’t help to start screeching about how natural it is and making cartoons
Yes, she is, which is why I asked the question that she will NEVER answer.
As for your wife, I’m sorry.
Ilana Mercer: “Is this man-woman, then, engaged in the “natural” act of breastfeeding, or is this something far more sinister like a sexual experience? Is this not tantamount to titillating oneself, using the baby to get-off?”
Women, too, get sexually aroused when breastfeeding. Seems to be pretty common.
https://www.adomonline.com/breastfeeding-arousal-and-orgasm-heres-why-you-get-turned-on-by-feeding-a-baby/
https://goaskalice.columbia.edu/answered-questions/arousal-while-breastfeeding/
https://breastfeeding-magazine.com/breastfeeding-and-arousal.html
https://www.romper.com/p/i-got-involuntarily-aroused-while-breastfeeding-i-didnt-realize-it-was-normal-60983
Some of them do their grifting and subversive work on the fake opposition side. See: Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, this gal, and many more.
Taken to another level, it can become a complete legal system, with arguments being made from any and all directions.
Lawyers, Judges. Jurisprudence. Setting standards. Defining what is right and proper. What is to be shunned and what is permitted. In other words, Rule.
You are ruled by those you cannot criticize. Someone said that once. He could have been right.
Now. Who might that be, today? But be careful. Severe penalties can go with speaking some truth in public. Best to speak truth about todays weather. Or the NFL.
But NOT them.
then again, consider Philip Roth’s words in “Portnoy’s Complaint.”
“The Chinese could be the one group of people, the Jews are not afraid of.”
So “get Joe Lieberman out of moth balls,” and so on.
Jewish input could actually prove quite helpful