The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information

Authors Filter?
 TeasersGene Expression Blog

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
🔊 Listen RSS

In the recent past the standard model of information distribution was one that had a few top-down nodes. There was print, television, and radio. Journalists collected a salary from the institution (obviously there were prominent exceptions in the form of famous columnists, but these were numerically not significant), which tasked them with specific beats. This traditional model is coming under great pressure, and to some extent dissolving. I don’t keep track of journalism, as such, because I’m not a professional journalist.* But it’s hard to avoid the headlines which chronicle layoffs, as well as the reality that professional journalist’s are being undercut by high quantity and (often) low quality content. Combining this with the fact that the null model of a free internet in terms of media access is likely to be undermined quite rapidly in the near future, and we’re in for some restructuring and updating of expectations.

One change has been the rise of subscription only emails by several young journalists. I subscribe to Conor Friedersdorf’s The Best of Journalism. Now in a recent conversation with Michael Brendan Dougherty Friedersdorf describes the former’s baseball newsletter, The Slurve.

Why would anyone subscribe to these services, when as Friedersdorf observes there’s a high proportion of links to free content? Friedersdorf himself wonders about the sustainability of this model of journalism as the gates close down on free sources of content. The latter does not seem that large of a concern to me. First, the pool of information from which one can draw upon across the internet is enormous (it seems likely that the BBC will be free for the indefinite future). Second, many websites are designed to be semi-permeable. If Friedersdorf has a subscription to The New York Times his links will offer free access to his subscribers. From what I have read this form of price discrimination by The New York Times has been moderately successful, and The Washington Post is looking to reproduce the model. What’s going to disappear is a one-size-fits-all menu. Some will be consumers of massive quantities of media, and they’ll pay a fair amount for that. Others will rely upon institutions and curators, and they will pay a moderate amount for that. Others will put in labor hours to engage in their own filtering in lieu of payment.

The monetization of personal curation seems somewhat novel. But there’s nothing new here; journalists have always curated with their own “beats.” To a large extent a blog is a form of curation for which many get paid. The content is much different. In some ways paid newsletters resemble the journals put out by one individual in the 19th century (e.g., Brownson’s Quarterly Review). The difference is the nature of the distribution. The great centralization of corporate media through mergers and acquisitions is now being subject to a countervailing force, as individuals create personalized brands which they can monetize with widely available commodity technology. It is part of the same set of forces which is leading to the maturation of 3-D printing.

* There is recurrent debate on whether I am, or am not, a journalist. If I am, it’s of an accidental kind, implying that I don’t reflect deeply on journalism in a way that self-identified journalists would.

• Category: Science • Tags: Journalism 
🔊 Listen RSS

A site called Quartz is going to go live today. I have been hearing a lot about it in the media (e.g., The New York Times). One of the people who launched ScienceBlogs, Chris Mims, is involved. I’ve seen a guideline for its freelance writers, and I have to say that I’m impressed by the flexibility and openness to variation and personalization that it communicates. Not sure if it is revolutionary, but I suspect that it will be quite the content machine. And the emphasis on tablets and mobile access via a browser, rather than an app, is probably the best way to optimize readership.

• Category: Science • Tags: Journalism 
🔊 Listen RSS
• Category: Science • Tags: Jonah Lehrer, Journalism 
🔊 Listen RSS

Felix Salmon points to someone who asks, Is the European crisis good for America? A piece at Politico suggests that Midterm fury might leave Nancy Pelosi safe. Journalism of this sort would get very boring, very soon, if the journalists actually had to place any money on their musings, either directly by changing their investment portfolio, or getting involved in betting markets like Intrade.

• Category: Science • Tags: Culture, Journalism 
Razib Khan
About Razib Khan

"I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. If you want to know more, see the links at"