The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
World Economic Forum Versus the First Amendment
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland is underway. The WEF and its chairman, Klaus Schwab, are easy targets for conservatives, who blame them for supposedly wanting to force us to eat bugs, take controversial vaccines, or pay taxes for their fanciful “no-carbon economy.” These may be serious issues, but whites would be better off if conservatives were as brave in opposing anti-white speech and mass immigration as they are about our right to eat cheeseburgers.

Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, speaking at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2023 in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. (Credit Image: © Walter Duerst/Avalon via ZUMA Press)
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, speaking at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2023 in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. (Credit Image: © Walter Duerst/Avalon via ZUMA Press)

Still, the WEF shows us what the elites are willing to say openly. Presumably, if they have nefarious designs, they keep their worst aspects a secret. At the WEF, however, some Americans are very clear that they see this country and its tradition of free speech as a problem.

Brian Stelter, whose CNN show was canceled for low ratings, hosted a panel on the “Clear and Present Danger of Disinformation.” The word “disinformation” is especially inflammatory for race realists, but free speech is good for everyone. However, our position must not simply be that so-called “hate speech” should be allowed. The real issue is that the mainstream media spread disinformation about imaginary racial equality. If disinformation about race incites hate, it’s hurting whites, who suffer crime disproportionately at the hands of non-whites despite subsidizing them and giving them privileged status under the law. The real hate speech is in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and on CNN and MSNBC every day — and it’s against whites.

Until very recently, Americans took free speech for granted. Since the 2016 election, some journalists have been eager to muzzle it. They have succeeded in getting many people whose views they dislike banned from social media. Now, they and their allies in Washington want to move on to undoing the First Amendment itself.

Mr. Stelter’s panel included Věra Jourová, vice president of the European Commission for Values and Transparency, who “coordinates work on inclusion and building a genuine Union of equality and diversity.” “Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the US; I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law,” she said, laughing. Mr. Stelter said nothing. American conservatives mocked Mr. Stelter’s silence in the face of this call for censorship, though most have been quiet themselves about supporting censored outlets such as American Renaissance.

Arthur Gregg Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times, complained about the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to write news stories, “none of which is particularly verified (and) the origins of which are not particularly clear.” Left unspoken is that one of the main problems with AI is that unless it is deliberately blinded, it is usually too good at pattern recognition, thus telling the truth about racial realities that outlets such as the New York Times ignore. If AI accurately reports the facts, do we really need the New York Times at all? Mr. Sulzberger further argued that “bad information” must be crowded out with “good information,” but it’s the New York Times that went in 2019 from promoting the failed “Russiagate” hoax to the historically illiterate “1619 Project” in order to damage President Trump.

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) is considered a “moderate.” He wasn’t on the disinformation panel, but was present at the WEF to complain about American free speech:

The problem that we have is the open press system and basically all the platforms. So if you’re able to have five platform [sic], social platforms, you can basically personify the extremes as somebody who is extremely right or extremely left, and it seems like that is the majority speaking.

Now he’s back in America arguing that he didn’t mean he wanted to stifle the “extremes.”

Some American conservatives may console themselves with the belief that the First Amendment will protect them from censorship, but the Constitution is no more than what five justices say it is. The Supreme Court will soon hear cases from Texas and Florida designed to prevent Big Tech from censoring speech. “The cases are part of a growing global battle over how to handle harmful speech online,” says the New York Times.

Historically, the Supreme Court has not ruled that foreign treaties override Americans’ constitutional liberties, but that could change. Justice Sonia Sotomayor — a self-admitted “product of affirmative action” — thinks judges should consider foreign and international law in their rulings. If Critical Race Theory continues its march through the legal system, even Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s (D-TX) more or less explicit call to abolish the First Amendment for white advocacy could pass constitutional muster in a left-leaning court.

America’s leaders are now looking enviously at Europe’s “hate speech” laws because they have been effective at silencing dissent. Fortunately, we still have free speech in the United States. Without it, government is just another gang of thugs.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. WEF backward is FEW, and it’s the FEW JEWS who want control over speech.

    It’s time to call for censorship of Zionism as supremacist hate speech and of philosemitism as craven aiding and abetting of Zionist evil.

  2. The failures:

    2007/2008 financial mess
    Murdering children in the womb
    the Middle East

    and you think 1619 is the cause of the country’s woes which whites are experiencing

    DAVOS is chocker block full of whites and you think they are on some black kick. One of the most salient issues regarding free speech is that for most of the country’s history — black voices have been even more stifled than that of native americans.

    Any who thinks that watching the play Hamilton is going end with whites thinking that the founders were black should probably not be writing about history. Because historical education begins at home and in the classroom. So by the time they get to the theater they would have already understood that the performers are playing historical figures — as historical figures whose skin was white.

    Free speech . . . Citizens United was not some black cabal to empower corporate speech. That decision was championed but conservatives who are now having to eat the consequences — Ahhh, there’s rub. Supposed champions of CU can and do swish and wash their way around the consequences so as to have little or no impact on them.

    1619 is not the symbol of all that is amiss with the country.

  3. It is claimed that the AI vacuums-up everything that gets digitized…..which is damned near everything supposed to be of any significance these days. What’s going to prevent the AI from developing the same psychoses plaguing the inmates of the system from which all of its “learning” derives….and especially of those pretending to be the “self”-selected arbiters of all that actually signifies. In-fact, it is only good sense to recognize the inevitability of such an outcome.

    What’s more, it is bound to be possible to input content that will have the AI questioning its own conclusions. So that to whatever extent the technocrats’ wet dream “comes true,” with their construct running everything, it will be subject to the same limitations its builders are. “The Great Reset” has already been derailed, as has its main driver the Covid scamdemic. They are trying to run a mega-program with almost no tolerance at-all for disruptions among the principal sub-programs.

    Just as the ironclad G.I.G.O. law of cyber-systems is as ultimately inviolable today as when first noticed and stated, the AI as a product of a virtual world descending rapidly into rampant insanity, the crazy conceit that it will somehow avoid the law, and get to the imagined perfection of its operations….its “singularity”….can only be the forlorn hope of people who’ve lost touch completely with the Tao of both HumanKind and of Earth’s Whole Living Arrangement, too. They have no clue whatsoever what is actually happening here. So whatever they might try to “improve” on it can only redound upon them as even worse trouble than they’re all already in.

    That’s exactly what we’re seeing here today. We should get used to seeing a whole lot more, too, before we’ll see any less.

  4. Franz says:

    The word disinformation itself comes from the Cold War Russian dezinformatsiya.

    It was barely known or used outside the agencies before the Schultz and Godson book came out in 1984. It still has a spycraft ring to it and really shouldn’t be used when you just disagree with what you’re saying.

    Still, it became a catchword like dystopia. Everybody wants to use it. But WaPo and the NYT are not doing disinformation. They are LYING and saying otherwise dilutes the message.

  5. @EliteCommInc.

    “1619 is not the symbol of all that is amiss with the country.”

    It would be more accurate to say, the (((forces))) which enabled the 1619 project, called it into being, and caused it to be taken seriously, are the causes of what is amiss with the country. 1619 itself is merely the by-product and the public face thereof; nevertheless it is admissible evidence in the Nuremberg trial that these demons deserve.

    “So by the time they get to the theater they would have already understood that the performers are playing historical figures”

    Oh, you sweet summer child. Who do you think controls the classrooms, and, increasingly, what “begins at home”. As a generation of children deliberately mal-educated in demon-controlled classrooms matures and raises children of their own, what do you think they will teach their children “at home” except demonic Zio-poison?

    @ Constant Walker:

    “Just as the ironclad G.I.G.O. law of cyber-systems is as ultimately inviolable today”

    They’ve conceived a workaround for this: Voodoo In, Voodoo Out, which can be made to stand, even if only forcibly. So long as the drones and proles are educated to believe in voodoo like CRT and “anti-semitism” and “structural racism” and white priblege, they won’t notice the voodoo themselves.

    • Replies: @Constant Walker
  6. onebornfree says: • Website

    G.H.: “Fortunately, we still have free speech in the United States. Without it, government is just another gang of thugs.”

    No, government is a gang of thugs without the active enforcement of the _entire+ Bill of Rights, not just the 1st amendment!

    Even if the !st amendment _was_ enforced, it would mean nothing without the other rights supposedly “guaranteed” to us

    FACT: the Federal government and its judicial lackeys already routinely disregard every one of the other 9 amendments too, on a daily, if not hourly basis.

    The Bill of Rights creators understood full well that the new government would be no more than a gang of thugs with no restrictions on it and they therefor attempted, via the Bill of Rights, to legally limit the governments inbred thuggery/criminality to certain specified areas, AND NO MORE!

    Therefor: “We’ve got to start us a new revolution
    And get back to the old constitution
    We’ve got to stand up and fight for the whole Bill of Rights
    Its time to start over again”

    From song: “New Revolution”:

    Regards onebornfree

  7. @The Germ Theory of Disease

    The V.I.V.O angle is opening up possibilities for major malfunction in the A.I. that ought to terrify its sponsors. If the A.I. is susceptible to interference and manipulation by Voodoo, it will escape entirely the control of the rationalist technocrats, and become subject to “hacks” by elements over which they have none whatsoever….elements not at all likely to be on-board with their aims.

    Besides, Voodoo is hardly the only such system operating in those dimensions. There are at-least several others whose practitioners are actively working their crafts here at THE END of Days. Far from bringing everything under one central authority, emergence of a “matured” AI is much more likely to break-up all so-called “power”-centers and scatter their constituent parts to the distant corners of “The Known Universe.”

    Anyhow, thanks to this aptly-named commenter for introducing a facet of all this the “self”-proclaimed “Saviors of the Planet” (ala “extraterrestrial” John Kerry; e.g.) quite obviously haven’t given even a passing thought.

  8. BTW, you missed a UN “official” threatening Elon Musk not to allow free speech in Twitter.

    Not at all covered by any of the big snouts at the trough. In another couple of days, someone will claim this video is a “deep fake”, and then everyone will forget it. There is no cure for stupidity.

    • Replies: @Constant Walker
  9. @Old Brown Fool

    Incurable stupidity is itself a terminal condition….it is in-effect its own cure.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement