The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
When Integration Means Ruination
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Weddings are usually cause for celebration, and royal weddings are cause for national rejoicing. Even we colonials are fascinated by the British royal family. In 2014, when King Felipe VI succeeded his father Juan Carlos I of Spain, the crowds were puny compared to the commoners who rejoiced to see Prince William marry Kate Middleton. So many of us are children of the British Empire that when we say “the Crown,” we mean the British crown.

May 5, 2011: USA News magazines Time and Newsweek show Royal wedding of Kate and William on their covers. (Credit Image: © Imago via ZUMA Press)
May 5, 2011: USA News magazines Time and Newsweek show Royal wedding of Kate and William on their covers. (Credit Image: © Imago via ZUMA Press)

The monarchy is seductive, and there’s a temptation to defend it when leftists attack it. Thus, when Prince Harry married the divorced actress Meghan Markle in 2018, the glee many felt at the monarchy’s humiliation was painful. Al Sharpton called the wedding a blow against white supremacy. Black pundit Melissa Harris-Perry said it was an act of intentional subversion and the true end of the British Empire. The presiding cleric, the black “Episcopalian” Michael Curry, said we should “make of this old world a new world.”

Bishop Michael Curry delivering the sermon at the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The Bishop said he felt the presence of slaves during the royal nuptials in St George’s Chapel. (Credit Image: © Owen Humphreys / PA Wire via ZUMA Press)
Bishop Michael Curry delivering the sermon at the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The Bishop said he felt the presence of slaves during the royal nuptials in St George’s Chapel. (Credit Image: © Owen Humphreys / PA Wire via ZUMA Press)

The perennially hopeful thought is that integrating the royal family would help unite the United Kingdom. However, having ignored Enoch Powell and imported the American race problem, the British are learning that integration doesn’t strengthen an institution. It hollows it out and may even destroy it.

The very existence of an institution can be painful to non-whites, and with enough diversity, it becomes meaningless even to the people who created it. As Joe Sobran wrote in 1997, “Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible.” He added that other races still feel subjugated even after the end of Western imperialism. Furthermore:

The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”

When Meghan Markle married Prince Harry, the Crown granted the former Suits actress the title “Duchess of Sussex.” This is an almost unimaginable honor for someone of her scandalous background. However, the Duchess now claims she had no idea what she was getting into and claims she hadn’t even looked into what the royal family was about before she agreed to marry Harry. After two years, the couple decided to renounce royal duties and move to America to be celebrities.

(Credit Image: © Ben Birchall/PA Wire via ZUMA Press)
(Credit Image: © Ben Birchall/PA Wire via ZUMA Press)

We’ve now seen embarrassing footage of Prince Harry negotiating with entertainment executives about his wife’s voiceover skills. The quasi-royal couple never concealed its disdain for Donald Trump. Last summer, the Duchess even supported ridiculous hate-crime claims from 18-year-old Althea Bernstein, who said four “classic Wisconsin frat boys” tried to set her on fire. After an exhaustive investigation, the police closed the case, saying “the attack, as Bernstein had described it, had not occurred.” Hers was about as plausible as Jussie Smollett’s tall tale.

In the honor culture that the monarchy emerged from, strength and duty justify power. In our modern culture, claims of victimhood are the path to power. Today, we’re seeing the conflict between victim culture and honor culture.

Queen Elizabeth II does her duty. She carries herself with quiet dignity. It’s her job. She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy. But if the sovereign can’t fight against the physical replacement of her people, there’s no point in having a sovereign. If she has failed, it’s because she held to her duty — never to take a political position — to the end.

Queen Elizabeth II in 2019 (Credit Image: Department of Defense / U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Dominique A. Pineiro)
Queen Elizabeth II in 2019 (Credit Image: Department of Defense / U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Dominique A. Pineiro)

Prince Harry’s approach has been different, but he doesn’t lack admirable qualities. He risked his life as a soldier for his country, and his partying and roguish behavior are modest by historic standards. Besides, it’s his older brother who is heir. Prince Harry had more freedom, but he had just one job: Don’t embarrass the family by talking politics.

He then married a woman who seems to treat the royal family as an ATM. The Duchess also understands that her (part) black skin privilege has more real power than any claim to nobility. She can call any criticism “racist” and rally journalists and fellow blacks to her defense. Prince Harry is now just some actress’s second husband.

Older forms of power are like the ritual of Trooping the Colour. The newer, more potent form of power was Meghan Markle (and her husband’s) interview with Oprah Winfrey. Miss Winfrey is another master at building power. Once a member of Jeremiah Wright’s radical congregation, she concealed her own racial grievances until her position was unassailable. Now, she lectures whites about unconscious racism and looks forward to generations of whites dying so that racism will finally end. A black billionaire used her massive platform to give a privileged mulatta a chance to claim she was a victim. Media power trumps royal prerogative.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah Winfrey. (Credit Image: © CBS / DDP via ZUMA Press)
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah Winfrey. (Credit Image: © CBS / DDP via ZUMA Press)

The White House praised the “courage” the Markles showed by talking about their “struggles with mental health.” Well, what about the commoners? About 7 percent of British children have attempted suicide by 17, a rate that will probably increase because of COVID. In 2013, nine-year-old Aaron Dugmore reportedly killed himself because he was bullied for being white. There was no national reckoning. A 2000 study found that blacks have higher self-esteem than whites, but “anti-racism” campaigners said this proves British society is even more racist than they realized. The Duchess’s pleas for sympathy get a much better hearing than cries for help from British whites.

The Duchess made several charges. She said a member of the royal family worried her son Archie might be too “dark.” Who said that? She wouldn’t say. And so what, anyway? She complained that the Palace will no longer provide security to the family. Why should it? The Duchess and her husband have quit their jobs. Meghan Markle said that she had “suicidal thoughts” but was discouraged from seeking mental health. A stiff upper lip was once an admirable British trait. Today, the best way to deal with pressure is to cry about it on television. Prince Harry chimed in to criticize his father, the future king, saying he “let down” his children.

Why would the couple make these charges, especially with elderly Prince Phillip at death’s door? Intentionally or not, they are creating an independent power base. Louis Phillippe II, Duke of Orleans, tried to curry favor with the French Revolution, even changing his name to “Phillippe Egalité.” Mrs. Markle’s strategy is working; #AbolishTheMonarchy was trending on Twitter after the interview. Labour MP and black woman Diane Abbot asked whether the royal family had learned anything in 25 years and demanded “serious reflection.” Thirteen centuries of duty and tradition may not be able to stand up to one hostile news cycle; the debacle will probably spur republican efforts in Australia and Canada.

The true irony is that this story really is about the privilege of a sacred bloodline. That bloodline is Meghan Markle’s black ancestry. A wealthy white woman complaining that the press is mean probably would win no praise. If Prince Harry had married a white woman and then left the royal family, I expect we’d be reading sneering articles about entitled “Karens.” Mrs. Markle’s (light) black skin means that in intersectional politics, she can’t hold real power despite her fame, wealth, and title. The Duchess doesn’t enjoy the “white privilege” of a rag picker in northern England.

Meghan Markle in New Zealand. (Credit Image: Mark Tantrum via Wikimedia)
Meghan Markle in New Zealand. (Credit Image: Mark Tantrum via Wikimedia)

You can criticize the Queen even in the most vulgar terms and face no legal sanctions, but don’t criticize non-whites or you may be arrested. This shows what lèse-majesté really means.

If whites complain about dispossession or say they aren’t racist, it’s “white fragility,” but Meghan Markle’s sense of entitlement is heroic. One non-white columnist wrote: “Women of colour don’t owe England’s angry white men a damn thing. There’s barely one of us who didn’t get where she is today in spite of them.” She got it entirely wrong. Mrs. Markle owes her position to a white man who, before her, had an important place in an ancient British institution. After receiving this gift, she is contemptuous and resentful. And so we get the absurd spectacle of a black billionaire asking a half-black actress with a royal title who lives in a $14.5 million mansion about how hard her life has been.

The affirmative-action aristocrat Meghan Markle is simply an example of a larger trend. When the black classicist Dan-el Padilla Peralta achieved a prominent position in his field — full professor at Princeton — he then called for the entire discipline to be abolished because it promotes “white supremacy.” When non-whites joined the International Society of Anglo-Saxonists, they immediately set about “reforming” it and insisted that even its name was “racist” and had to be changed. When composer Nebal Maysaud became prominent in chamber music, he wrote a piece accusing classical music of being about “whiteness” and therefore “it’s time to let classical music die.” Michael Steele became the head of the Republican National Committee because, in the words of an American Conservative Union spokesperson, he was “a black guy.” Today, Michael Steele and other former black Republican “leaders” enjoy a steady rotation on cable news attacking the GOP for not welcoming blacks.

This is what happens when traditional intuitions are “integrated.” Non-whites welcomed with great fanfare turn on their benefactors. Joe Sobran is probably right. Blacks who suddenly “lead” something whites created can’t help thinking it’s foreign. They feel no duty or loyalty towards something their own people could never have built.

The foundations of monarchy are hierarchy and sacral order. Monarchy can’t pursue “equality” without destroying itself. Perhaps Prince Harry fancies himself another Phillippe Egalité, but he should remember that his democratic friends cut off his head in the end. If Harry has set in motion the abolition of the monarchy, there will be no reason to pay attention to Mr. Markle at all.

The Martyr of Equality, Behold the Progress of Our System, 1793, by Isaac Cruikshank
The Martyr of Equality, Behold the Progress of Our System, 1793, by Isaac Cruikshank

There is only one way to win the diversity game. Don’t play. You are racist no matter what you do. If you are a racist for keeping your institutions white, at least you still have institutions.

What of the Crown? I join with black Labour MP Diane Abbott in hoping the royals have learned some lessons, though not the same ones. I hope they have learned that affirmative-action aristocrats are poison. Diversity dilutes the Sovereign’s bond with her people. Royalty can’t compete with celebrities at being celebrities. The Sovereign — and everyone in her family — must be something more than celebrities. The Windsors must change, but not in order to “celebrate diversity.” They should rededicate themselves to their original purpose. Start by stripping Prince Harry of his title and letting him stay on as house husband to a voice actor. Don’t take him back when she leaves him — as she surely will.

The way forward is not modernization but Restoration. The Crown could become the unifying symbol of the Anglosphere by defending the Church of England, British culture, and the accomplishments of Anglo-Saxons everywhere. Andrew Fraser proposed such a solution in The WASP Question:

The monarchy must return to its original and still legitimate role as the voice of Anglo-Saxon history and Christian traditions; recovering WASPs [White Anglo-Saxon Protestants] around the world must pray for a Patriot King who, instead of abetting the divisions of his people . . . will endeavor to unite them, and to be himself the center of this union.

A post-Brexit United Kingdom could retain relevance by strengthening ties with the white nations it created, with the monarch as the unifying symbol. All whites, including non-Protestants or even non-Christians could take pride in this vision. Thomas Jefferson wasn’t much of a Christian, but had great pride in his Anglo-Saxon heritage and the founding stock. He even proposed the Germanic warriors Hengist and Horsa as the symbols on our national seal.

The Windsors are incapable of building such a monarchy. The palace will bunker down while the institution decays. I don’t think we have a stake in “saving” a monarchy that won’t save itself and serves no purpose beyond attracting tourists. The current ruling house proved its uselessness by letting the Markle wedding proceed.

If the Windsors are swept away as a result, conservatives, nationalists, and Traditionalists will no longer be blinded by nostalgia. Something new can be built. That’s better than slow-motion collapse presided over by a figurehead with no power or purpose.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 403 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Dutch Boy says:

    A sweeping away of the Windsors would leave an opening for a return of the legitimate royal house: the Stuarts. Francis II awaits.

  2. The adjective “white” in its current Woke usage really means something like “competent,” as in, “acting white.” So the current attack on whiteness, white supremacy, white nationalism and so forth are really attacks on a people who are just more competent at the job of flourishing than most other populations.

    • Agree: Realist, Rich
  3. Prince Harry is now just some actress’s second husband.

    That’s about all there is to say. A cautionary tale about thinking with the small head.

    • Agree: Z-man, Irish Savant
  4. SafeNow says:

    “The current ruling house proved its uselessness by letting the Markle wedding proceed.”

    How could they have stopped it? H&M would have been confident of having ample sources of wealth beyond the allowance from Charles. Cancel his title? Harry is not the heir anyway.

    Superb essay. Just two quibbles. I would not have called Markle an “actor.” She is an “actress.” Second, I would have mused that without the distinctive — okay, I’ll say it — cute — nose, the entire exhibition of performance-art would not have been the same.

  5. Gene Su says:

    The problem is that the Windsors are not really British at the core. The Windsors are really descended from the House of Hanover, a German noble family. One of their members immigrated from Germany in the aftermath of the English Civil War at the beginning of the 18th Century after the Stuarts were deposed.

    Maybe allowing Meghan Markle into their ranks really didn’t make the bloodline worse than it already is…

  6. @SafeNow

    Hmm surely the Palace has its own intelligence service that could have ran , ahem, interference as needed until Harry had come to his senses….. of course, Andrew’s cavorting with the late Mr. Epstein suggests that the Royals may simply ignore feedback. And Harry’s extreme woke-ness suggests that he lacked any serious mentors to right his sails

    • Agree: Boomthorkell
    • Replies: @AndrewR
  7. Yes, I think creating a new aristocracy and faith, Church of Mota-style, is the best way to save the Anglo-Saxons, and surely an exciting thing to follow this current era with.

    Honestly, it’ll be good for everyone else too.

  8. Here’s to Prince William hitting his head and becoming our guy, then reigning supreme as King William V, the leader of white civilization.

    • Agree: James Speaks
    • Replies: @GeeBee
    , @AndrewR
  9. orionyx says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Stuarts? Parvenu! Enabled by the degenerate Tudors, who massacred all the Plantagenets – the legitimate Royal Family – they could find. John Broom II is waiting in the wings.

    • Agree: Dutch Boy
  10. orionyx says:

    I think the Royals could strike back hard by opening up and asking the Royal College of Heralds to revamp Harry’s coat of arms by adding a bar sinister to the Hewitt arms, if such exist.

  11. anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:

    Markle does have one good point. There is a double standard by British royals and the media against her. The royal supporting British establishment remains quiet about Prince Andrew’s sordid affairs with Jeffrey Epstein. It takes the Indian media to explain this. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-prince-andrews-controversies-british-royals-meghan-markle-7218578/

    In 2020, it was reported that Andrew was a person of interest in the Epstein investigation in the US, and that the US Department of Justice had submitted a mutual legal assistance request to Britain’s Home Office to formally interrogate Andrew. US investigators that year openly accused Andrew of providing “zero cooperation” with the case.

    The Royal Family’s “double standards”
    In February this year, when it was confirmed that Harry and Meghan would be permanently stepping back as senior royals, it was announced that the two had lost their royal patronages, and that Harry would be stripped of his military titles.

    Critics have said that this treatment of Harry stood in stark contrast with how Andrew was treated. Since 2019, although Andrew does not undertake any official duties, he continues to hold on to a number of military titles, including commodore in chief of the Royal Navy’s Fleet Air Arm and admiral of the Sea Cadet Corps, as per the Express.

    • Agree: Iris
  12. Malla says:

    Non-whites welcomed with great fanfare turn on their benefactors.

    This is common in the Third World. Why do you think it is a low trust society? Biting the hand that feeds you is very common here.

    Perhaps Prince Harry fancies himself another Phillippe Egalité, but he should remember that his democratic friends cut off his head in the end.
    You are racist no matter what you do.

    Conservative YT thinks that if they give in a bit to the leftard crackpots, show understanding, maybe all this hatred and genocidal aggression will stop. Nope it will not. You can vote in a Black president twice, your media can become anti-YT. They are never pleased, it is never enough. They will never stop will you are all genocided and every trace of your existence is destroyed. Blacks, Muslims, Indians, Chinese, Jews etc…all of them.
    Give them an inch they will take a light-year.Why do you think most people in third world countries never budge from their positions in a fight and resolve things rationally (sometimes we do, mostly we do not), never take guilt over past wrongs much. Because such liberal behaviour is seen by primitive minds as weakness to be exploited.

    If whites complain about dispossession or say they aren’t racist, it’s “white fragility,”

    Why not reverse the script? If they darkies keep on harpin and screaming and complaining, start calling out non White fragility.
    People in Third World countries complain to check how much they can push you to get stuff. You do not give in and they respect you and keep quite.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  13. How disgusting, Oprah holding court with the “royals”. How opportunistic and shameful of her since she can’t get an interview with the other royals and how evident it now is, that her hidden hatred for whites has finally emerged. Makes one laugh at all of the nutty mostly white women, who would dress up for her show in their Sunday best for years on end..

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Truth
  14. Gordo says:

    So many of us are children of the British Empire that when we say “the Crown,” we mean the British crown.

    And when your ruling class say ‘the Prime Minister’ they mean Bibi.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF, Iris, Ugetit, Miro23
    • LOL: Hibernian, Skeptikal
    • Replies: @Iris
    , @hillaire
  15. Gordo says:

    She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy. But if the sovereign can’t fight against the physical replacement of her people, there’s no point in having a sovereign.

    Agreed, I cant see the next royal generation lasting long in place. In Aus and Canada I can’t see Charles being proclaimed sovereign at all.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @anonymousperson
  16. The Royal parasites should have all been divested of their estates and thrown out long ago. It was always a mystery to me that so many young British men were willing to fight and die in wars to enrich these degenerate elites. They would have been at least as well off under Napoleon. Kipling summed up the situation after the loss of his son in the Zionist contrived meat grinder of WW1: If any ask us why we died tell them ‘because our fathers lied.’

    Britain never recovered from the cataclysmic disaster of the first world war and the loss of 700,000 men in order to halt German economic ascendancy, stop German and Russian alliance and advance the cause of world Zionism by gaining the worlds most strategic bridgehead of Palestine as promised head Zionist Jew Lord Rothschild, and establish the “eastern kingdom (USSR) for the Zionist cause.

    Not satisfied with the results of the first go around, the “Jew Focus Group” used con man and Zionist operative half Jew Churchill (mother Jenny Jacobson) to instigate a new war. The Royals of course supported all of this in between vacationing. What can be expected from a country that has been controlled by the Jews since the days of Cromwell? They were really in such poor state economically after the first world war that the British were totally dependent on Jewmerica for aid when the Zionsits instigated the second one using their own Zionist shill FDR led by Bernard Baruch and his 52 Jew advisors. How many of those old British vets would have fought if they had known how the country would end up?

    It is only proper that the Royal money pit breed with mulattos. Britain has been following the Jew (Warburg) Kelergi Plan of miscegenation for cultural and ethnic ruin as fast as possible. They really should stop doing it in halves but instead be the true models of racial demoralization and destabilization that the Jews expect of all the white nations. Just as the queen has condemned the British peasants for not getting the Gates mRNA chemotherapy injection, the British youth should be taught at an early age to seek out the blackest Africans possible as mates. It is imperative to the elites that all the white nations reject the decadent European culture by fully assimilating with the multiculturally enriched negroes of Africa.

    The Royal layabouts are of course also super hypocrites along the same lines as fellow elite globalists such as Bill Gates and WEF chief Klaus “you will own nothing and be happy” Schwab. In July of 2019 Prince Charles imparted some more of his majestical wisdom upon the world by stating we have “18 months to fix climate change or humans will go extinct.” The Club of Rome elites have been pushing this line now for over 50 years while living in luxurious estates and constantly jetting all over the world. Everyone else is urged to cut back on everything including a 20% reduction in meat.

    It is likely that the MSM hype about Markle is to a large extent a cover for the activities of Prince Andrew and his sexual excursions with pedophile Epstein as a frequent visitor to Pedo Island and regular at the Epstein Mansion in N.Y. What about all those carbon emissions?

    Hood implies that the British monarchy is deteriorating. I don’t believe that is an accurate assessment. It has never been anything but a degenerate racket of privileged insiders who use legalized and obscene privilege to fleece the productive segment od society. In former times the Royals used this productivity to control the army to keep the peasants under control and the worlds most powerful navy to blockade anyone who would not submit to their extortion racket. The Jews using the British Royalty ran the Atlantic to Caribbean slave trade as well as the opium trade through their East India Co.

    Although Britain is now just a shell of the former empire thanks to its commitment to and control by the Zionist Jews, the degenerate Royals continue to leech off the citizenry. Their legacy goes on. From the attack and seizure of the Boers South African wealth that laid the ground work for the Anglo Zionist syndicate launch of WW1, the Royals have been part of the scam ever since. Queen Victoria’s son Edward VII was one of the anglo Zionists led by ringleader Alfred Milner. He was in debt to the Rothschilds and spent so much time in the whore houses of Paris that they even set up special “accommodations” for this degenerate Royal parasite.

    What is there to the monarchy to be restored? Jefferson as ambassador to France was acquainted with most of European Royalty and he stated that none of them would be fit to serve in the lowest elected office in Virginia.

  17. He then married a woman who seems to treat the royal family as an ATM.

    Priceless.

    The Duchess also understands that her (part) black skin privilege has more real power than any claim to nobility. She can call any criticism “racist” and rally journalists and fellow blacks to her defense.

    As we can see unfolding in UK media now.

    Prince Harry is now just some actress’s second husband.

    Precious.

    That single paragraph unpacks the whole sordid affair.

    Archie had a chance to be a Prince when (if?) Charles ascends to the Crown … would that make him The New Black Prince, great warrior of the woke?

  18. BuelahMan says:

    Maybe its just that I’m a Mississippi redneck, but personally, I give zero f#cks about royalty (Oprah) or the other two either.

    • Agree: Truth, gay troll
    • Replies: @Resartus
    , @Fr. John
  19. Realist says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Makes one laugh at all of the nutty mostly white women, who would dress up for her show in their Sunday best for years on end..

    Yes, excellent point.

    • Replies: @Mark Tapley
    , @AceDeuce
  20. @Gene Su

    The first “German George” was installed after Queen Anne died childless in 1714. He was so contemptuous of his new subjects that he never deigned to learn the English language. His descendant Victoria married the German prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, g-g-grandfather of the current monarch. The royals changed the family name to Windsor during the rabid hatred of all things German of World War I.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  21. Anonymous[118] • Disclaimer says:

    There’s something seriously wrong with Harry.

    A few years back someone on imageboards posted a series of Meghan’s topless images. It’s impossible to describe how ugly her feet are. Those fucking things at the end of her legs still give me nightmares occasionally. They were clearly built to efficiently traverse the African savanna – in solitude – but never, ever to be seen by another human being. Ugh.

    I’m just hoping that Meg and her simp will fade away into relative obscurity so I won’t have to be reminded anymore. Nothing worse than reopening the old wounds.

    • LOL: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @The Real World
  22. anonymous[795] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    Blacks and Latinos do not want to genocide whites. They want to race mix. Latino-white mixed race babies are already 10% of births in the US.

  23. fenster says:

    Communism in theory has never been achieved and all we are left with is the terrible actual existing versions.

    By contrast the monarchy has worked. But that doesn’t mean it must work, even if a return to the cultural values connected with it seem to be overdue. There’s the problem of the actual existing Anglosphere to contend with. Maybe the US and Australia have some fight left in them but most of what I hear from England suggests that the return to values conducive to a proper regard for monarchy (duty, noblesse oblige, sacrifice, prudence, dignity) is not bloody likely.

  24. Let’s just agree that Meghan used Oprah with the intent of becoming even more wealthy. While Oprah used Meghan and Harry to become even more fabulously wealthy. Kinda like a Ménage à trois of filthy lucre.

    Yes, I know, Oprah is already a billionaire. But, even billionaires dream of becoming even more wealthy. Say as decadently wealthy as Bezos or Gates. We’re talking hundreds of billions. Not the paltry ten’s of billions or even the lowly single digit billions.

    What we need is a new cable show called “Who Wants to be a Trillionaire” so that the serfs can watch fat whores like Oprah, and even Meghan, make asses of themselves trying to outdo each other in the quest to become the first acknowledged trillionaire. (I’m pretty sure QEII or at the very least the Rothschilds are the unacknowledged trillioinaires of the world.)

    Good luck to Meghan and Harry. I hope their fifteen minutes of fame ends poorly for them. Or, as Jerry Seinfeld on his show once said, “But I don’t want it to be because of me. It should be the traditional route; years of rejections and failures ’til she’s spit out the bottom of the porn industry.”

  25. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    Blacks and Latinos do not want to genocide whites.

    Disagree, maybe Hispanics, Blacks are big into genociding Whitey.

    Dr. Kamau Kambon advocated EXTERMINATING all white people (on C-SPAN in 2005)

    • Replies: @36 ulster
  26. Dutch Boy says:
    @orionyx

    Great Idea! My wife is a distant descendant of the Plantagenets; she could be Queen Elizabeth III.

    • Replies: @hyper bole
    , @BDS Always
  27. Resartus says:
    @BuelahMan

    Maybe its just that I’m a Mississippi redneck, but personally, I give zero f#cks about royalty (Oprah) or the other two either.

    Oprah is just another “Affirmative Action” Celebrity….
    Some group spent nearly a 1/4 Bn $, before she was able to
    take the reins as the ’80s ended…..

  28. Would have been a better show hosted by Wendy Williams.

  29. @orionyx

    I think the Royals could strike back hard by opening up and asking the Royal College of Heralds to revamp Harry’s coat of arms by adding a bar sinister to the Hewitt arms, if such exist.

    ….or by adding a banana.

    • LOL: AceDeuce
  30. Svevlad says:

    That Meghan lady is so cringe. “muh race muh race”. Like being what 1/8 black makes her not white – maybe in the autistocratic anglo world – we normal people of course don’t accept such retardation.

    What’s worse is that Harry married her, because it’s obvious by her behavior that she’s an insufferable imbecile

    better if he went to Africa and got himself an actual tribal princess. The benefits of a traditional woman AND the virtue signaling from the (full) blackness

    • Agree: Biff, Miro23, Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Miro23
  31. lloyd says: • Website

    In the interests of historical truth, King Louis Phillippe was not guillotined. He escaped to England in 1848 as Mr Smith. He died in England in 1850. One guillotined King is bad enough.

    • Replies: @Roberto Gentilli
  32. Prince Harry’s approach has been different, but he doesn’t lack admirable qualities. He risked his life as a soldier for his country…

    That is disgraceful nonsense. He was not doing anything “for his country”; his country gained no benefit from its criminal attack on Afghanistan. He was also not “risking his life”. He was not a soldier but a helicopter pilot slaughtering humans on the ground from the total safety of his machine high in the sky. He did it because he’s an arse.

    • Agree: Badger Down, RedpilledAF
    • LOL: 36 ulster
    • Replies: @Alexander Turok
    , @Lurker
  33. AceDeuce says:

    #BlacksRuinThings

    • Agree: TKK
  34. 36 ulster says:
    @Malla

    “Doctor” Kamau Kambon (!) The Shaman Look becomes him, but that dashiki is soooooo Seventies. “Blacknificent Books”, eh? “A bookshop with an extremely-thin collection of extremely-thin books.”

    • LOL: Malla
  35. Weddings are usually cause for celebration, and royal weddings are cause for national rejoicing. Even we colonials are fascinated by the British royal family.

    Because of the hype. For most Americans, the British Royal Family is just an extension of celebrity culture. No wonder the trashy Princess Diana was the most famous and popular among all the Royals in both US and UK. The Bimbo had nothing on her mind but pop culture.

    The monarchy is seductive, and there’s a temptation to defend it when leftists attack it. Thus, when Prince Harry married the divorced actress Meghan Markle in 2018, the glee many felt at the monarchy’s humiliation was painful.

    Monarchy doesn’t lead. It follows. Its demise demonstrates all too well the worst aspects of both conservatism and liberalism. Conservatism can lead to stasis and stagnation, the loss of vitality, like with Ancient Egypt, Traditional China, and Byzantium. One part of the Royal Family became like a Wax Museum, a hall of mummies. But the Family’s increasing appetite for publicity and mass approval in accordance to changing fashions illustrates the bad side of liberalism. (As royalty lost power, what did it have left but publicity?) Spinelessly bending whichever the wind blows. No backbone. If conservatism can be overly rigid and lead to enervation — bones that aren’t exercised become more brittle, a kind of osteoporosis — , liberalism can fall into the habit of surrendering to the latest fads as ‘new liberations’. (But then, as these ‘liberations’ become ever freakier and more perverse, as with globo-homo and tranny-wanny nonsense, greater social control and repression are necessary to impose them as the new holies, resulting in minority-tyranny.)
    The Royal Family exhibits both characteristics of conservatism-gone-wrong and liberalism-gone-wrong. Things just got progressively worse since the Royal Family awarded the Beatles. The Beatles were great, but it was a case of pandering and profits. Prince Charles and Princess Diana respectively exhibited conservative dissipation and liberal dissolution. Charles came across as insular and stood for nothing but privilege. And Diana came across as vain and hollow, eager to hobnob with the celebs. The result was Harry, though there have been speculations that Charles isn’t his real father, which makes it even worse as it means cuckoldry.

    The perennially hopeful thought is that integrating the royal family would help unite the United Kingdom. However, having ignored Enoch Powell and imported the American race problem, the British are learning that integration doesn’t strengthen an institution. It hollows it out and may even destroy it.

    UK’s fate follows America’s because both are under Jewish Domination, something Jared Taylor’s American Renaissance is loathe to discuss. But there’s another reason. After the fall of empires, the two of the biggest former players, UK and France, decided to turn their own nations into Potemkin Empires. If UK and France could no longer rule the world, their own nations would be turned into micro-facsimiles of what their empires had been. The UK would maintain the Commonwealth and reach out to former colonies. Also, by welcoming the very people who’d kicked them out, the British and French might gain the moral upperhand. “YOU kicked us out, but WE let you in. You hurt us, but we hug you.” By welcoming immigrants and migrants, the white nations would display their tolerance in contrast to the ‘xenophobia’ that inspired the anti-imperialist uprisings across the empire. It was a subtle way of signaling the non-whites are the ‘real racists’ because they’d kicked out the white colonialists who were trying to create a New World Order, i.e. the non-whites refused the forces of progress like the Germanic Barbarians long ago halted the grand Roman experiment.

    But of course, there were reasons other than Empire-Nostalgia. The Leftist intellectual elites found a new pet cause in non-white immigration as they’d grown tired of the native proletariat(that just become the new consumer class). They loved to white-knight as the defenders of these struggling immigrant communities from ‘nativism’, ‘racism’, and ‘xenophobia’. They beat their chest and virtue-signaled as the people of compassion. The nastier types on the Left knew mass immigration would lead to violence and trouble, but they were excited by the prospect of radicalism and revolution. They were addicted to anarchy; it’s like Antifa rioting in Portland over US immigration laws. And given the plummeting birthrates and increasing disdain for low-level employment among the whites, the business class grew ever more reliant on immigration labor. If the left was active in pushing for diversity, the right became increasingly passive in accepting it. Morally defensive in a world where ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’ were the biggest evils, the Right either feared being called ‘racist’ or felt that the Decline of the West was inevitable due to historical forces beyond control. And there was Jewish Power pushing it along to use increasing diversity among goyim as divide-and-rule tool for the Jews.

    Anyway, the latest Royal debacle isn’t the start of anything new. It’s just icing on the cake for the Negrobalists. UK has become so Afro-cucked, Globohomo-cucked, and Judeo-cucked over the years that the royal comedy is just a late-stage manifestation of the mass infestation that has spread all throughout British Society. Notice Harry married a light-skinned mulatto who doesn’t look quite black. Just wait until some princess marries a dark-skinned Negro. There was a movie called UNITED KINGDOM that celebrates the sexual union of a British woman and a Negro man. The message is clear: Africa is the dominant penis, and Europe is the submissive vagina. That is the Ideal Union according to the New Narrative in UK that has black boxers and other athletes as ‘national heroes’. And white girls routinely bump-and-grind with Negro men in the streets and clubs of UK. Conservatives are hardly better. Niall Ferguson abandoned his white wife and kids for some worthless Somali Negress who, as the tool of Neocons, would have us believe that MOOOOSLIMS are the main threat to white women when, if anything, the two biggest enemies of white women are Jews and Negroes. The gall of that black whore; she steals a man from his wife and kids but crows about the dangers of Islam. Jews control the media and encourage white girls to act like sluts and skanks, and Negroes are the most criminal race, not least in sexual assault. But just like one bunch of white cowards are too wussy to call out on Jewish Power but rag on China & Iran instead, another bunch of cowards focus on the MOOOOSLIMS.

    As Joe Sobran wrote in 1997, “Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible.” He added that other races still feel subjugated even after the end of Western imperialism. Furthermore: “The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call ‘minorities’.”

    This is rubbish. In truth, non-whites bash whites because whites bash themselves, and whites bash themselves because Jews colonized their minds. Eventually, Sobran came around to addressing the Jewish Issue but soon got ‘canceled’ by William F. Cuckley.
    White-Bashing has three main reasons: (1) Jewish control of media and academia. Jews instilled whites with ‘white guilt’ and promoted ‘scape-whiting'(scapegoating of whites) among the non-whites. (2) Endless white virtue-signaling about ‘white guilt’. Whites themselves made white-bashing into a Western Value. So, ironically enough, when non-whites bash whites, they are actually following in the footsteps of whites. (2) White Loss in sports to blacks. Sports is the main generator of idols, and when blacks beat up whites, blacks lost respect for whites and whites lost self-respect; whites became cucked, and over time, non-whites around the world came to see blacks as the alphas towering over wussy white cucks; it’s like yellow boys in China worship NBA stars(even though blacks are using their muscle power to pummel immigrants in Chinatown).

    [MORE]

    If whites ruled the West, exhibited racial pride, and set the terms, most non-whites in the West would be full of respect and admiration for whites. Indeed, isn’t it odd that there was more non-white respect for whites in the Age of Empire when whites were proud and ruthless? Back then, despite all the resentment and animus, there was also respect and admiration. So, what happened? Whites followed the Jews and began to hate themselves, and as the non-white world follows the white world, it began to hate on whitey because white self-hatred was the new whiteness. Indeed, non-whites in Europe, Canada, & US who show respect & sympathy for white folks are likely to be treated less well by educated whites. White elites feel virtuous in their white-bashing and insist that non-whites join in the chorus of white-bashing. Michelle Malkin isn’t anti-white, but so many whites hate her for that very reason.

    Last summer, the Duchess even supported ridiculous hate-crime claims from 18-year-old Althea Bernstein, who said four “classic Wisconsin frat boys” tried to set her on fire.

    Althea Bernstein, a Jewgro? Jews are champion liars and so are blacks. Then, a Jewgro is naturally a super-liar. Of course, Madison Wisconsin is White Guilt Capital. Whites there love to virtue-signal about how anti-white they are.
    What kills me about this idiot Meghan is her total lack of self-awareness. If she’s so into blackness and equality, why did she pursue and marry a White Prince? Why not marry a coal-black truck driver? Go blacker and live among regular folks. But she wants to be at the top while pretending to care for the downtrodden(among the blacks of course, as we never heard her say anything in support of Palestinians or Syrians). But then, this hypocrisy defines the Western Elites who are mostly status-obsessed go-getters who send their kids to the toniest schools and hobnob with the fancy crowd but also make much noise about ‘social justice’ and ‘equity’.

    Still, as ridiculous as Althea Bernstein’s accusations, they were somewhat in line with America’s founding. In truth, the British were NOT tyrannical over the American colonies. After a grueling war with French Canada(which the colonials insisted upon), the British slightly raised taxes on the colonials, which was justified given the costs of war. Only 1/3 of colonials had problems with the Brits. 1/3 supported the king, and the other 1/3 remained neutral. And the rebellion succeeded only because of the intervention of the French monarchy that was far more ‘tyrannical’ than the British. Colonials who called for independence banked on French intervention to secure victory against the wishes of 2/3 of the colonials who didn’t join the Revolution. So, America’s very founding was built on mass hysteria and a big lie(though, to be sure, the Founding Fathers were men of immense talent and intelligence, which can’t be said for the current morons of PC).

    In the honor culture that the monarchy emerged from, strength and duty justify power.

    The problem with monarchy is inheritance of power invariably leads to decadence and insularity. Spain under monarchy grew weaker and even freakier. Most kings were fools, and most princes were idiots. Tsar Nicholas was a moron, and Kaiser Wilhelm a petulant jerk. While it takes a strong man to gain the throne by war and conquest, princes just inherit the power and grow up pampered. So, ‘honor’ was mostly talk, mostly BS, just like ‘democracy’ is today.

    In our modern culture, claims of victimhood are the path to power. Today, we’re seeing the conflict between victim culture and honor culture.

    Not really. If it were so, does anyone really think American Indians gain lots of power by bitching about victimhood? How come Palestinians don’t have power in Europe or the US even though they made endless cases of their victimhood at the hands of Jews?
    It’s not the case that talk of victimhood leads to power. Rather, those with power use their control of victimhood narratives and iconography to shore up their own power and/or to favor their allies. So, no amount of Palestinian talk of victimhood will lead to power or guarantee sympathy from the West. No amount of American Indian historical gripes will lead to real power.

    Jewish victimhood matters because Jews got the power. They control media & academia; as such, they get to decide the Official Narrative or compulsory narrative. And US politicians cuck to Jews endlessly. It’s plain as day that Zionists victimize Palestinians, but both political parties favor Jews and Israel. So, where is Palestinian power despite the Palestinian plea for sympathy? Is BDS movement getting anywhere? Even Democrats attack BDS, and most ‘leftists’ would rather focus on trannies and BLM than on Palestinians or countless Arabs killed by US Wars for Israel. Of late, Utah passed anti-BDS legislation. Why would a conservative white state do that when Jews are mostly Democratic and push anti-whiteness? Because Jews got the power to mold white minds and make-or-break white success. As far as Jews are concerned, their supremacist domination depends on white cuckery. That’s why Jews use their immense power to emphasize black victimhood while minimizing the tragedy of Palestinians and Arabs in general. Jews can tie black victimhood to ‘white guilt’, whereas Palestinian victimhood is most inconvenient to Jewish Power.

    So, victimhood is really the tool of those with power. Indeed, white American history was also full of victim-narratives. When whites had the power, they were the victims… though ultimately with the wherewithal to become the victors. They were moral tools used by powerful whites to justify their power and expansion. So, even though whites were moving into Indian territories, the narrative was often about noble white settlers being attacked by ‘hostiles’ and ‘savages’. Yellow journalism spread wild stories about Spanish authorities sexually abusing American women to inflame popular support for war. Even though the US was secretly aiding the British in World War I, it played the innocent victim when Lusitania was sunk. The US knowingly drove Japan to desperation and wanted it to attack to justify American entry into war, but the Pearl Harbor narrative would have us believe totally innocent and peace-loving America was violated by an act of infamy. Even though US was butchering countless people in Vietnam, it portrayed itself as defending the world from communist tyranny. And look at the whole US establishment today. US surrounds China, Iran, and Russia but bitch about Chinese aggression, Iranian aggression, and Russian aggression. US foreign policy is pure Bill Laimbeer. It commits all the fouls but cries foul about the various Axis of Evil.

    And consider Christian History. Christians went on and on about the victimhood of Jesus as the Son of God. They reminded themselves and the world of how the early Christians been fed to the lions. But was it such victimhood talk that led to their power? No. If anything, on their path to power, they flattered the Romans and tended to blame the JEWS for the killing of Jesus. It was once they gained power that they began to use the victimhood card as a moral justification for their power-lust. So, even as Christianity became the official religion of the empire and even as Christian mobs were smashing pagan temples and burning people at the stake, they were making endless noises about their victimhood at the hands of pagans. The Christian Way, which pioneered the politics of victimhood, was to gain the power and then to use the power to bemoan their victimhood to justify their increasing power.
    The powerless gain little traction with their victim-narratives. Just like you gotta spend money to make money, you gotta have power to gain more power via victimhood narratives.

    What we have today isn’t so much victimhood leading to power but the power exploiting the victimhood narrative. Jews got the power. They control the banks, media, academia, and law firms. They got the politicians in their pockets. And so, Jews endlessly push ‘Muh Holocaust’ narrative while suppressing BDS and Palestinian narratives. Also, Jews flatter blacks as moral allies. As blacks have been (selectively) associated with slavery, Jim Crow, and Civil Rights Movement — never mind that all of black ‘history’ was about savagery, slavery, and brutality in the Dark Continent — , having them as allies means that Jews have the blessing of Noble Negroes. This gives Jews a free hand to oppress Palestinians. I mean, how can Jews be bad when their allies are the Noble Negroes?
    It goes to show that much of current ‘morality’ is less about ideology than about idolatry. So, never mind that the Jews are acting supremacist and ‘racist’ toward Palestinians. And never mind blacks are aiding and abetting Zionist Apartheid and also racially attacking non-blacks. If ideology ruled, Jews and blacks would be judged like everyone else and be called out on their own acts of ‘racism’. But as Jews are iconized as the Holocaust Race and as blacks are idolized as the Slavery Race, they are always justified no matter what they do. As their very identities have been ‘sacralized’, they are judged for what they ARE than for what they DO.
    So, as long as Jews have blacks as allies, how can they be ‘racist’? Blackness is idolized as ‘struggle against racism’ in the US Narrative, and if blacks are allied with Jews, it means Jews are also associated with ‘anti-racism’. Of course, Jews have also been banking on their Holocaust Iconography that says Jews are the Shoah Race, the victims of ‘racist’ Nazis. Thus consecrated, it doesn’t matter that it’s the Jews who’ve been acting like Nazis against the Palestinians. No matter what Jews do, they are a bunch of Anne Franks, and to the extent that Palestinians resist them, they are the Arab ‘Nazis’.

    But white ‘conservatives’ are no better. They too indulge in Moral Idolatry. Why are they so eager to have Jews on their side? It’s because of what Jewishness symbolizes: Holy Holocaust Victimhood. So, never mind what the Jews are doing and how it resembles apartheid South Africa or Jim Crow in the US South. Never mind such ideological considerations because idolatry is all that counts. Jews got the power to elevate themselves as the Holy Holocaust People, and white ‘conservatives’ want to be associated with such symbolism regardless of how Jews really act.

    So, never assume that victimhood narrative alone leads to power. Current America is not about victimology but victorimology(or victor-victim-ology). As Patton said, “Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser.” Why do Jewish victimhood and black victimhood count for so much? Because they are victors and winners in their respective fields. Jews have proven themselves as the brainiest people, and mind-power leads to money and influence. In other words, Jews are awesome, and THAT is why the Holocaust was so terrible: It victimized a superior people, the real master race. And blacks have proven themselves as the brawniest people, and muscle-power leads to fame and fortune in sports. As Patton said, “Americans admire the toughest boxer, the fastest runner.” Well, they are blacks. Also, Americans love pop music dominated by blacks with stronger voices, and in our sexualized age, whites got jungle fever for black buns and dongs. And that is why Americans care about black victimology. Whites feel especially guilty because they feel they enslaved the superior race of top athletes, rappers, and long-dong-silver & twerking T’keymah.
    In contrast, brown Mexicans haven’t gained much traction in victimology because they’re mediocre in all areas. So, even as whites are ideologically or rationally committed to ‘equality’, they ‘idologically’ and emotionally feel about brown Mexicans, “They’ve been a bunch of slaves, servants, and low-wage workers because they suck at everything.” It’s just how things are. It’s like men will they regard all women as equally worthy as human beings. But such ideological considerations go out the window when they see a pretty babe. She is favored over the plain janes. Idolatry > Ideology, and Jews know this.

    She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy.

    The problem is Britain came to identify itself as an empire than as a nation. Thus, the King or Queen was no longer just the sovereign over national folks but everyone in the empire. When Britain ruled over India, the Hindus and Muslims there were told that the British monarch was their rightful and kindly ruler as well. This mentality has stuck. Like the Romans, the British became so flush with power and domination that Britishness became less a matter of national identity than pride in imperial might and domination. Of course, back in the Age of Empire, the Brits tried to have it both ways. They insisted upon their non-white subjects to accept ‘inclusion’ in the empire and revere the British King or Queen as their own sovereign WHILE, at the same time, being very race-conscious and emphasizing the white-pride element of imperial glory. It was a contradiction not unlike that which came to rack the Roman Empire. Both empires allowed great deal of participation from subject folks, but there was also a barrier between the conquerors and the conquered. As a corrective of past imperial mistakes, globalism envisions a New Empire where the West would rule the world again BUT with total and full participation of the darkies. An empire of ‘equity’… at least on paper, as the globo-homo empire is really about various goyim serving their Jewish Supremacist masters. Jews certainly don’t want to be equal with anyone.

    Prince Harry’s approach has been different, but he doesn’t lack admirable qualities. He risked his life as a soldier for his country,

    Did he now? For his country? But how is the occupation of Afghanistan related to British interests? Britain is merely serving as sidekick to the US military that serves Jewish Supremacism. So, even Harry’s ‘service to his country’ was really just an indirect cucking to Jews. If he really wanted to serve his country, he would have called out against the insane Western policies in the Middle East. But no, ever the mindless dog, he served in the military to perpetuate the Jewish globo-homo war in the Middle East. The trite notion that a man who serves in the military is some patriot serving his country must GO. No, most US soldiers are not heroes or patriots. They are mercenary goons who signed up for benefits. They are perfectly willing to bomb and murder foreigners for future career prospects. And they are mindlessly fighting illegal wars and killing innocent people. And British military is just a sidekick of the US military. The hoary nonsense about soldiers-as-heroes is a sad joke. Soldiers are heroes ONLY WHEN they defend the motherland from invasion.

    The Duchess also understands that her (part) black skin privilege has more real power than any claim to nobility.

    Jews need white submission. So, Jews especially use blackness to guilt-bait whites. Thus morally paralyzed, whites seek redemption, and then, Jews pull a bait-and-switch by saying whites can redeem themselves by supporting Zionism and more Wars for Israel.
    Black Power cannot be understood apart from Jewish Power. As for Oprah Winfrey, the fat whore is totally a Jewish-media creation. If Oprah cares so much about victimhood, how come she’s never done a show about the plight of Palestinians or what Obama’s policies have done to Arabs and Africans in Middle East and North Africa? That fat baboon is just a tool.

    Once a member of Jeremiah Wright’s radical congregation, she concealed her own racial grievances until her position was unassailable.

    Oprah was made by the Jews, but then, most famous blacks are. Notice she bashes whites but never ever Jews. Even blacks who bash Jews are enticed with lots of prizes if they were to only bash whites and turn a blind eye to Wars for Israel. When certain blacks bash Jews and whites, whites and Jews react the same way. Whites denounce those blacks of anti-Jewishness, and Jews denounce those blacks of anti-Jewishness. Jews don’t denounce both the anti-white and anti-Jewish vitriol. If the blacks apologize only to Jews while still lambasting whites, Jews are only too happy to work with them. Take Al Sharpton. He used to call Jews ‘diamond merchants’, but he got lots of money and has been a good Negro ever since, at least to Jews. Jews control the gods and the gold. Indeed, so much of US politics and culture could be explained in terms of…”Jews give you money.” It certainly goes a long way to describe why GOP and Democratic politicians act the way they do. Jews don’t care how much blacks hate on whites. If anything, Jews add fuel to the fire. Jews get antsy only when blacks turn on Jews. The understanding between Jews and blacks is “We Jews give you money” and “We blacks bash whites but never Jews.”
    But are white cuckservatives any different? GOP’s relation to Jews is, “Throw us some money and don’t bash us too badly, and we will praise Israel to high heaven and never ever call out on Jewish behavior.” Even Jared Taylor, though totally deplatformed by Jews, clings to the fantasy of white-Jewish alliance, a day when the superior race of Jews will finally see the light and join forces with whites against the darkies. What an idiot.

    A black billionaire used her massive platform to give a privileged mulatta a chance to claim she was a victim.

    In a way, the very institution of royalty invites victimhood mentality. Take the story of the princess and the pea. She arrives at the castle and insists she’s of royal blood. So, how do they find out if she’s telling the truth? They put a pea in the bed to see how sensitive her skin is. When she complains about the pea, they know she must be of royal blood because of her preciously sensitive skin.
    We associate fancy-pantsism with elitism, but elitism is linked with victimism. Elites have higher standards and feel offended by anything that doesn’t meet their highfalutin criteria. For most ordinary folks, a regular cup of coffee is good enough, but only the best coffee will do to an elitist who will feel ‘victimized’ by inferior coffee, like the scene in MULHOLLAND DR.

    In the film SWEPT AWAY, who feels more victimized by being shipwrecked? The poor Southern Italian male or the rich Northern Italian blonde lady? It’s the latter because she’s used to finer things. Why do educated elites feel so ‘triggered’ by everything? They believe themselves to be TOO GOOD for most jobs; they want the best and look down on working class ‘deplorables’. Even as they virtue-signal about ‘justice’, they have fancy-pants view of themselves and feel wronged whenever something doesn’t go their way.

    In ROB ROY, the fancy-pantsers feel wronged or ‘victimized’ by the slightest infraction. What most people accept as ‘Life’ is downright ‘triggering’ to the fancy-pants neo-aristo elites. So, paradoxically, victimhood mentality spread precisely because things got better for most people who got to feeling like divas. Take the boomers. They had it much easier than their parents who lived through hard times and war. But they felt sooooo victimized by everything. And they raised their kids to feel entitled and oh-so-special.

    Why are blacks bitching more than ever, indeed far more than blacks who really had it tough in the past and had to work from sunup to sundown for cornbread and ripple? They don’t know hunger, they all got smart phones, and they all want to be Jay-Z or Rhianna. Celebrity culture has spread a kind of vulgar-royalty mindset around the globe. And globo-homo made it worse cuz homos and trannies are among the most narcissistic snot-nosers around. When you see some tranny getting hysterical about being addressed as ‘he’ than ‘she’, it reeks of royalty or aristocratic mentality. So, in a way, victimhood mentality ironically flows not only from the mob but from the snob. Take PLANES TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES. John Candy the fatso Deplorable is pretty accepting of the pitfalls of life, but Steve Martin the affluent professional snivels and sneers at all-things-common and feels ‘wronged’ by having to rub shoulders with regular joes. And every minor trifle was a major victimization moment for Princess Diana, oh boo hoo hoo. This is why the French Revolution did nothing wrong when it killed so many fancy-pantsers. With Meghan Markle-Mertz-or-whatever, victimhood has turned into victim vanity with nouveau-aristo flair. That pea in the bed was just too much for her, boo hoo hoo.

    Black sensitivity has gotten worse because they consider themselves to be the new royals of the West. After all, so many black athletes, rappers, and stars are idolized by whites. Black soul is regarded as holier. MLK and Mandela are bigger than god and jesus. Oprah was praised by white liberals and conservatives alike as Soul-Nanny of America. Such cultural climate was bound to affect black attitudes and expectations. When blacks were struggling for simple equality, their minds were focused on basic matters. But after several decades of MLK worship, Magic Negro adulation, Jungle Fever, and Blacks Sports idolatry, blacks have developed a vulgar royal mindset and feel entitled to be respected and served by everyone. So-called ‘reparations’ are really tributes and offerings, i.e. non-blacks as lesser-beings exist to work, pay taxes, and present gifts to blacks gods and kangz. Jews feel much the same way. And homos now regard themselves as highfalutin aristocrats of the West and feel oh-so-offended if we don’t praise all things ‘gay’ everyday. They take umbrage at any criticism of homosexuality or the homo agenda, much like an aristocrat was outraged that a mere peasant dared to act uppity towards him. An aristocrat was someone who materially victimized the peons but felt emotionally victimized if the peon said, “I don’t want to be your dog anymore.” Today, blacks like Meghan and others feel ‘victimized’ by non-blacks who insist it isn’t their sole purpose in life to kiss black ass and wash black feet. In a way, what goes by the name of ‘victimology’ is about certain groups taking on aristocratic airs about history. You see, they are oh-so-very-special and it was such a grave injustice that history didn’t treat them better. In truth, of course, history has been a bitch to all peoples, and it’s just the way of the world. Just ask the Palestinians.

    The Duchess made several charges. She said a member of the royal family worried her son Archie might be too “dark.” Who said that? She wouldn’t say.

    Well, one thing for sure, she didn’t want to marry someone who’s dark. She married lily-white Harry. If she’s so proud to be black, why didn’t she marry a coal-black dude? She is the product of black-white mixing and she chased after whiteness, but she’s bitching that whites are color-conscious. If she really loves blackness, why not move to Africa and marry Bongo-Wongo? Total lack of self-awareness. In a way, her endless yammering about blackness seems a cover for her white-preference. She wants to be with a white man and have a white-looking kid, but lest she lose her credentials as a Noble Negress, she whines endlessly about ‘racism’ to maintain her street cred. It’s like she married into the exclusive world of royalty but yammers about ‘equality’ and ‘inclusive’ as deflection of her own snobbery(or at least hobnobbery).

    The true irony is that this story really is about the privilege of a sacred bloodline. That bloodline is Meghan Markle’s black ancestry. A wealthy white woman complaining that the press is mean probably would win no praise.

    Not necessarily true. Think of all the love Princess Di got, and she was a royal pain the arse(though Charles, the conversationist with flowers, was no better). You can get a lot of love even if you’re white and rich. All you got to do is associate with the right causes. Princess Di, the celebrity-hog, got very cozy with the fruitcakes and was so adored by Elton John and the like. So, even if whiteness has fallen out of favor, it can be half-redeemed via association with Jews, blacks, and homos.

    This is what happens when traditional intuitions are “integrated.” Non-whites welcomed with great fanfare turn on their benefactors. Joe Sobran is probably right. Blacks who suddenly “lead” something whites created can’t help thinking it’s foreign. They feel no duty or loyalty towards something their own people could never have built.

    Why don’t you name the Jews? Gee, could it be that the problem began when the West ’emancipated’ and then ‘integrated’ Jews into white institutions? Could it be Jews ‘deconstructed’ whiteness and reconstructed it into a form of demonology?
    While integration or ‘inclusion’ have their problems, I don’t believe it necessarily leads to subversion from within UNLESS whites have lost all pride & dignity and the new grand theme is ‘whites are evil’. When whites lack self-respect, why would(or should) non-whites respect whites? When whites bash themselves, why wouldn’t non-whites do likewise because, after all, whites still set the tone in the West? This anti-white trend didn’t begin with integration of non-whites into white institutions. Rather, anti-whiteness spread among whites first even before this integration gained momentum. And whites became this way in large measure due to Jewish Power and influence.

    The foundations of monarchy are hierarchy and sacral order. Monarchy can’t pursue “equality” without destroying itself.

    Monarchy can destroy itself in many ways. Tsar Nicholas certainly didn’t pursue equality but totally destroyed his domain. Also, as you’ve said, the problem isn’t so much that the British Royalty is pursuing real equality but bending to the rise of Afro-Nobility, or Black Lives Matter More. But then, the British elites and monarchy bent to Jewish Supremacy already. When Jews gained both money and moral supremacy, they were like the gods of UK.

    I would argue the French and British Monarchies would have done better if they’d practiced a bit of genuine equality long ago with their own folks. Instead of enclosing themselves in fancy pants palaces and dining on fancy cakes, how about if they’d opened their bloodlines to the regular folks? Suppose princes were encouraged to marry common women(of virtue) and if princesses were encouraged to marry common soldiers(of valor). Such would have kept the monarchies real and in touch with the people. It also would have infused some fresh blood into the family. Look how anemic most royal families got. Who is the finest wife in movie history? It’s Jesse James’ wife in THE LONG RIDERS. She has common dignity and personal pride, a quality you don’t find among the fancy-pantsers. Indeed, look at what all the inbreeding did to the Spanish Royal Family. It turned them into freaks. The great thing about National Socialism was it opened the elite ranks to common Germans who proved their worth.

    There is only one way to win the diversity game. Don’t play. You are racist no matter what you do.

    There’s a better way. Name the Jew. Mention how Jews use diversity as divide-and-rule tool. Also, given Jewish hostility to whites, tell whites to seek White Liberation from Jewish Power and Privilege. Tit-for-Tat. Stop cucking to Jews who push jungle fever on whites. Jared Taylor calls for ‘white advocacy’, but that is so wussy. ‘Advocacy’? At this point in history? No, whites must call for white liberation, and ask ‘what from?’, the answer should be obvious: Jewish Supremacism that controls everything and props up black supremacism and homo-supremacism.

    The Sovereign — and everyone in her family — must be something more than celebrities.

    That ship has sailed long ago. There is nothing left about the Family but celebrity gossip. It’s total trash and must go. You can revive a comatose person but not a dead person. The Royal Family is deader than a doorknob. It is only good for jokes.

    A post-Brexit United Kingdom could retain relevance by strengthening ties with the white nations it created, with the monarch as the unifying symbol.

    ROTFL. Post-Brexit, the UK has imported more non-whites than ever. Brexit was not about cutting UK from the non-white world. It was about cutting UK from Europe and inviting more non-whites to be New Brits. It was retarded.

  36. We need to be more subtle about terms imo. Because most people here, or anywhere, would not damn some random black person for a statistic about his race.

    Racism (groupism): extrapolating group characteristics through contact with individual members of a group/race, or extrapolating individual characteristics through contact with that individual’s group/race statistics.

    Racialism: comparing group statistics between races/ethnicities/groups.

    The latter is a fair game, the former is assumption.

    Say you meet a black man and joke he must have a big dick (0.2 inches longer on average from me and my friends’ boredom days trading oil futures!).. now if his dick is short, he is directly offended because obviously the stereotype does not apply to him. And if he is well endowed? Then you haven’t judged him, but used a wide brush to tar him with an extrapolation. You may have guessed right, but how is that fair to that individual?

    We need to become comfortable with discussing the racialist lay of the land that exists, whilst avoiding falling towards extrapolation – racism – within our individual human interactions.

    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  37. @SafeNow

    All royals technically need the Queen’s blessing to marry. Stopping it on the basis of Muh Nuremberg Laws would be fantastical, but there’d be a precedent for objecting to Markle being a divorcee, see the 1936 abdication crisis.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  38. @acementhead

    He was not a soldier but a helicopter pilot slaughtering humans on the ground from the total safety of his machine high in the sky

    If the Talibs didn’t want to fight a technologically superior adversary, they shouldn’t have attacked one.

  39. @Realist

    The overstuffed baboon Oprah who didn’t even know how to pronounce Canada correctly was the Frankfurt School product of the Jew MSM to radicalize the women. Practically everyone and everything on the MSM is a part of the narrative they are pushing. I believe that the Royal parasite Harry’s marriage to the mulatto was part of the narrative also. The Zionist elite are determined to miscegenate the white nations out of existence as revealed by the Warburg’s shill Count Kelergi when the Pan European mov. was founded in 1926. Many of the goyim are influenced by disinformation agents such as Zionist shill Oprah and pay close attention to the supposed activities of the Royal parasites. They use the monkey see monkey do approach with all the “celebrities” like the Kardashian whores to influence the masses.

    Just as lots the goyim were fooled by the Jew MSM with it’s portrayal of queer JFK, who’s partner Lem Billings lived with him in the White House was covered up as was JFK’s real health situation with his Addison’s disease, incurable STD’s and a back so bad that much of the time he could not climb steps. People see the picture the Jew media paints.

    • Agree: TheTrumanShow
    • Replies: @robwin
  40. Truth says:

    The Duchess also understands that her (part) black skin privilege has more real power than any claim to nobility.

    About 7 percent of British children have attempted suicide by 17, a rate that will probably increase because of COVID. In 2013, nine-year-old Aaron Dugmore reportedly killed himself because he was bullied for being white.

    The true irony is that this story really is about the privilege of a sacred bloodline. That bloodline is Meghan Markle’s black ancestry.

    Dude, your article is so childish, backbiting and juvenile, it reads like a 13 year-old girl’s twitter, who wrote it while she was shaving her girlfriend’s legs at cheerleader camp.

    • Disagree: Rurik
    • Replies: @Thomasina
    , @Dave Bowman
  41. Truth says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Makes one laugh at all of the nutty mostly white women,

    Not nearly as hard as it makes one laugh at all the wimpy eunuchs who concern themselves with women’s “business.”

  42. Truth says:
    @Anonymous

    A few years back someone on imageboards posted a series of Meghan’s topless images. It’s impossible to describe how ugly her feet are.

    Ron, did you declare March, Ghey History Month on the site?

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  43. “The presiding cleric, the black “Episcopalian” Michael Curry.”

    Ouch. That’s like referring to “an Hispanic priest named Francis.”

    Curry is the Presiding Bishop of the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, aka the Episcopal Church.

    I was working for the Church back then and there was a lot of crestfallen-ness when Today and other media outlets referred to “a priest from Chicago” giving the sermon.

    It was hard to stifle my laughter. It’s especially funny because the whole ‘episcopal” thing is that they only have bishops, no archbishops or cardinals or Pope, everyone equal (as in the Declaration of Independence) but they do have a “Presiding Bishop” elected every few years. To think they’ve so totally dropped out of public consciousness!

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  44. AceDeuce says:
    @Realist

    Laugh if you want, but those stupid, brainwashed b!tches are what got Clinton, Obama, and Biden elected.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    , @Truth
    , @annamaria
  45. ” The Crown could become the unifying symbol of the Anglosphere by defending the Church of England, British culture, and the accomplishments of Anglo-Saxons everywhere. ”

    The Episcopal Church in the US spends all its time sucking up to Hispanics and gays, having confused “virtue signaling to the woke elite” with “a strategy to reverse catastrophic decline.” They have truly swallowed the Republican (ironic!) idea that Hispanics are “natural Episcopalians.” It never occurs to them that Hispanics already have a religion (R.C.) if they want to be religious, and if they don’t, there’s no reason anymore to be an Episcopalian. They’re really not interested in Henry VIII’s divorce, or alien episcopal supremacy. There are now fewer Episcopalians than there are people in Detroit.

    If they had been smart, they would have gone in the other direction, and instead of pursuing Wokeness, made the Church an anglophile theme park. Play up the whole Downton Abbey, Sherlock Holmes, King’s Speech, Pride and Prejudice thing.

    Get woke, go broke.

    • Agree: sayless, MrVoid
  46. Tor597 says:

    The Anglos are just getting what they deserve.

    Anglos are really acting like they haven’t been spreading wokeism overseas for years.

    Well now that it came back and bit them, they have no one else to blame but themselves.

  47. @Ilya G Poimandres

    “Racism (groupism): extrapolating group characteristics through contact with individual members of a group/race, or extrapolating individual characteristics through contact with that individual’s group/race statistics.

    Racialism: comparing group statistics between races/ethnicities/groups.

    The latter is a fair game, the former is assumption.”

    The “latter” is gobbly-gook nonsense. The former is the fair game.

  48. BlackC says:
    @WorkingClass

    Prince Harry is now just some actress’s second husband.

    Indeed. Just call him Mr. Markle from here on out and be done with it.

  49. “Prince Harry […] risked his life as a soldier for his country”
    Dear Sir,
    Are you mad? Is this how you introduce a war-criminal? The ginger monster carried a lethal weapon into Afghanistan with intent to kill. Did he actually bag some game?
    England does not need defending against Afghanistan; Afghanistan needs defending against English thugs like Ginger Ari. I demand a retraction.
    Yours sincerely,
    Disgusted of Horsham

  50. “When integration means ruination”

    It always does.

  51. @lloyd

    Sorry, no. Philippe d’Orleans, Philippe Egalité, the one who played with equality and that this article refers to, was guillotined in 1793. The one who became king Louis Philippe and escaped to England in 1848 was his son.

  52. Biff says:
    @Priss Factor

    If that isn’t the longest comment it’s gotta be close.

    • Agree: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Schuetze
  53. @Mark Tapley

    Thanks for all your comments in this thread.

    • Agree: Rurik
  54. @Truth

    You are welcome to suck on those ghastly elephant toes all you want,stud!😄

    • Replies: @Truth
  55. @anonymous

    For some time I’ve thought it very possible that Andrew was the designated adrenochrome courier for the royal family.

    Epstein would have likely been a prodigious supplier and the young girl diddling was just a perk along the way for Andy. Seems a solid theory to me.

  56. @Gene Su

    “…Maybe allowing Meghan Markle into their ranks really didn’t make the bloodline worse than it already is…”

    That bloodline is white-Germanic (even Saxon), so why compare it to mulattos?

  57. Dumbo says: • Website

    The monarchy is seductive, and there’s a temptation to defend it when leftists attack it.

    A monarchy is pretty useless if instead of promoting and following tradition they just parrot or even promote the “woke” status quo. What have the English Royals done or said against immigration, against homosexuality normalization, against… anything really? The Queen recently even came out saying that you are being “selfish” if you don’t take your Covid “jab”… I mean, really… This coming from someone living in a lavish lifestyle at the taxpayers’ expenses.

    As for Prince Harry, I tend to agree with Ann Barnhardt, he’s probably a bastard anyway (son of Diana’s lover), that’s why they don’t care so much that he married that mixed-race strumpet.

    https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/03/05/unsolicited-advice-for-queen-elizabeth/

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  58. ‘Western man towers over humanity..’, most particularly in aggression, theft, genocide and hubris. Hence the hysteria of racist rage at China’s rise.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  59. @Mark Tapley

    As John Norton, the ‘colourful Sydney identity’ in the 19th century, said of the Royals, in his the “Truth’ rag, they are but a ‘..pack of pestiferous Prussian pauper princelings’, and they breed like rabbits.

    • LOL: gay troll
    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  60. @Mark Tapley

    You are heroically ignorant regarding the Club of Rome and its famous ‘Limits to Growth’ Report. As it said, although resource depletion was inevitable, the greatest near term crisis would be that of pollution, and consequent ecological collapse. They put at c. forty years after the Report, ie now, and here it is. The only organisms that believe in unlimited growth are capitalists, cancers and denialists. That the denialist metastases keep up their lunatic ravings so very late in the day is now almost funny. That they pontificate with Dunning-Krugerite self-delusion, makes it really rib-tickling.

  61. idealogus says: • Website
    @Gene Su

    If you know a little history you also knew that the British people are descending from Germany – the Anglo-Saxon tribes.
    Plus some Viking and Norman blood (meaning also Nordic-germanic).
    So the British people who came from Germany also have a king/queen who came from Germany.
    Where is the problem?

  62. Dumbo says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    The gall of that black whore; she steals a man from his wife and kids but crows about the dangers of Islam.

    Well, I’d think that Niall Ferguson also has some part of the blame, or not? As a non-white woman who became a minor celebrity at the time thanks to the neocons, of course Ms. Ali would want to use her prestige to land a high-status white man. It was his own fault for abandoning wife and children for her. Also, he seems to be a neocon tool too, so I wonder if the whole marriage (like Meghan’s and Harry’s) was not also arranged, to promote race-mixing and such.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  63. @orionyx

    Plantagents, wasn’t that the bloodline who emerged from the ocean dripping with seaweed? The last of them, Richard III, got a pike through his head at Hastings, courtesy of Rhys ap Thomas, whose descendant is writing to tell all of you Plantagenets that you’re welcome to more of the same. Peace out, king baby.

  64. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:

    Harry is a bastard, fathered by Capt. James Hewitt.


    Photo: Harry and Captain James Hewitt, who played “Hide the Banger” with Harry’s Mom, Princess Di. (Source: That’s a Dead Bitch Right There…)

    • Agree: Wielgus
    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @TGD
  65. Ross23 says:

    I’m British and one of the most surprising things is despite a world class education how dumb they all are.

    Maybe all those centuries of in breeding has damaged the intelligence genes.

    We have the next in line (Charles) who thought being a “defender of faith” as opposed to a faith made sense ( presumably he’s including satanism and Scientology too in that?)

    Andrew who thought his friendship with a convicted peadophile who held underage sex parties would end well.

    Now we have Harry who thought marrying a superbitch with a chip on her shoulder would end well, who her half sister called a narcissist, who treated her own father with contempt and just about anyone else who’s ever been in her life.

    She’s got the attention, will get her career money, she’s used him up like a spent fuel cell, now he’s no good financially.

    How long before she bores of the ugly ginger idiot and runs off with a stud that can please her.

  66. Thomasina says:
    @Truth

    But he’s right, the White women were sucked in.

  67. frontier says:
    @anonymous

    Blacks and Latinos do not want to genocide whites. They want to race mix.

    LOL… Isn’t that the same thing? Think…

  68. Iris says:
    @Gordo

    The whole article misses the elephant in the room: that the British press, and foremost Zionist mouthpiece The Daily Mail in particular, carries out a systematic anti-Markle campaign to promote and enhance the image of her “rival”, Zionist asset Catherine Middleton, the future Queen Consort, who is Jewish.

    Mrs Middleton mother’s name is Goldsmith, her ancestors all bore typical English Jewish names such as Myers, Harrison and Temple.

    Mrs Middleton’s direct Jewish ancestry was the subject of many online articles back when she got married in 2011; all this information has now been culled from the Internet, which is as good a confirmation as one can get.
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-jewish-king-and-queen-o_b_876455

    Markle herself is a Jew sycophant who got side-lined by a more powerful, attention-seeking Jewess supported by Israel’s media machine.
    Whites’ self-appointed advocates really are hopeless.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Thanks: Schuetze
    • Replies: @CCG
  69. Franz says:

    …Meghan Markle is simply an example of a larger trend

    Let’s hope they keep right on overplaying their hand.

    Look, most whites in the real workaday world are aware of what a deadly farce “diversity” is. But they also know humans must eat, need shelter, and so on. Since the Red Thirties the gatekeepers have decided what’s good to go along with, and what to clap or boo at. So they know cops and teachers will get fired for saying or even implying certain things. The gatekeepers can keep money going to dependable whores and keep deplorables out.

    We all know and talk to some of these people. We know the bars to this prison are invisible and that, for now, we can only hope the frustration will lead to a workable alteration of this mess.

    In that spirit, let’s all hope Harry has a secret plan of his own. Something like his whole marriage was a scam he dreamed up to expose the lie of equality. Just imagine his hit musical play called The Slut and I where all of us can watch comic bits from his riotous “marriage” and holler FREE AT LAST during the encore.

    I can dream, anyway,

    • LOL: AndrewR
  70. Thomasina says:
    @Truth

    Black skin is in vogue for the moment, and so is victimhood. A juvenile, self-centered, narcissistic, who-can-I-blame-for-my-own-lack-of-character culture. Meghan Markle is a perfect representative.

    • Replies: @Truth
  71. Refl says:
    @Mark Tapley

    I would add that Prince Harry is most likely the son of his mothers horse keeper. Diana could probably not cope with all the rottenness of her royal family, took revenge by providing them with a bastard prince, and finally got divorced and went on to date a rich muslim heir.
    For her attempt to blow up the royal shit show she paid the ultimate price, when she was assasinated in that tunnel in Paris.

    So now it is the son’s turn to avenge his mother.

    The French royalty was beheaded, the Russian tzar was shot with his family, the Kaiser has been disgraced – British royals as the worst bunch of criminals among them all is condemned to live forever as the laughing stock of the Western ex-civilisation. Oh, the horror, the Horror!

  72. Iris says:
    @Alexander Turok

    If the Talibs didn’t want to fight a technologically superior adversary, they shouldn’t have attacked one.

    Congratulation for you efficiency at triggering human interaction: I am pinching myself right now.

    Is it possible to still write such nonsense almost 20 years after 9/11?

    • Agree: John Fisher, Schuetze
  73. GeeBee says:
    @Dutch Boy

    As I finished reading the article, I had already decided to comment regarding the necessity of a restoration of the legitimate Stuart claim, and to sweep away these Hanoverian pretenders, these supine puppets of parliament that have squatted at Windsor since the death of Queen Anne, and there you are in the number one spot, having royally beaten me to it!

    Well said sir!

  74. robwin says:
    @Mark Tapley

    You neglected to mention that JFK was also a meth addict.

    • Replies: @Mark Tapley
  75. GeeBee says:
    @40 Lashes Less One

    Of course, once he becomes King William V, his heir would be a Jew. I wonder what White civilisation will then think of being led by Jewish King George VII?

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  76. AndrewR says:
    @houston 1992

    I think Harry blackmailed the family with the threat of a nasty exposé if they didn’t assent to his marriage. Well, looks like he followed through with that threat in the end anyway. I suppose he does have some cards up his sleeve still. He and Meghan held back some damaging info (or at leaat they pretended to). Everyone wants to know, for example, who fretted about the baby maybe being too dark. No one at Unz would judge that person (probably Charles) too harshly, but, for shitlibs, such an offense would merit regicide.

    • Replies: @Iris
  77. AndrewR says:
    @Alexander Turok

    No, it’s only the top 6 now, but Harry is still in the top 6. He was #5 at his wedding.

    Charles and Camilla are divorcés (with Camilla’s ex still alive) so no one could have used that as a pretext.

  78. AndrewR says:
    @40 Lashes Less One

    We’ve still got 25+ more years of Charles, and ? more years of Liz. I think this has been a wakeup call to them all. They thought that letting Harry marry his petulant sociopath mulatta prostitute would be the least bad option. Wrong!!!

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  79. @Truth

    I would agree with you except that it’s usually not an eunuch type male that concerns himself with women’s business. Instead, women are in general a great concern of genuine men and as seems to be the case, that’s how most women genuine women have preferred it thru the ages.

    • Replies: @Truth
  80. Jiminy says:

    I wonder if they went in overnight and did away with all of the hanger-ons, bit like the Romanov episode and the next day there was a Nigerian family instead living in Buckingham palace- would anyone notice or complain? Or care for that matter. Presenting Mr and Mrs Mngarvey.
    And of course with the majority of the commonwealth being non-whites by an extremely large margin, they are strangely still enthralled with the royal family.
    You could imagine somebody asking the colour of your baby, especially if you’re a ranga with pasty white skin and red hair. Poor kid. It’s funny when you see Markle standing together with Pippa Middleton though, as Pippa appears to be of darker skin tone than Harry’s missus.
    The only thing missing from this whole comedic saga is Beau and Hope. I’m still trying to work out how they fit in to it all.
    But if there were no royalty, what would you have in their place? More politicians I suppose.

  81. @Gene Su

    Yes because as we all know, having German ancestry is on the same level as a two bit mulatto from America.

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
  82. gotmituns says:

    Is Markle an octoroon, mulatto or just a straight darkie?

  83. AndrewR says:
    @anonymous

    Andrew retired from the Navy. Harry served for a while but he left before retirement. That’s an important distinction, at least by US standards.

    Also, there is no evidence that Andrew is apathetic about, let alone hostile to, the family in general. I think he wants to make the family look good or at least not bad. His bizarre interview was the result of foolishness not malice. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan clearly have it out for the family, and I suspect they both did before the wedding.

  84. AndrewR says:
    @Mark Tapley

    One of Jefferson’s contemporaries, Big Freddy, King of Prussia, was one of the greatest rulers in history, and the main idol of a great Austrian/German leader a bit closer to our day.

    Sadly, yes, the British elite sold out to the Jews almost 400 years ago. But one can be forgiven for holding out a bit of hope that the House of Windsor/Mountbatten/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg/etc will step up and fulfill their role as defenders of the realm and a light unto their people.

  85. AndrewR says:
    @Observator

    I don’t think you’re being fair to him. He was 50 years old by the time it became clear he would become king of Great Britain. And I’m pretty sure he did become proficient in English eventually, although his English was probably never as good as his half Scot/English mother’s. As William Thackery put it:

    “His heart was in Hanover … He was more than fifty years of age when he came amongst us: we took him because we wanted him, because he served our turn; we laughed at his uncouth German ways, and sneered at him. He took our loyalty for what it was worth; laid hands on what money he could; kept us assuredly from Popery … I, for one, would have been on his side in those days. Cynical and selfish, as he was, he was better than a king out of St. Germains [James, the Stuart Pretender] with the French king’s orders in his pocket, and a swarm of Jesuits in his train.”

  86. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    China’s “rise” is nothing but the mass application of the White man’s inventions. Without it, the Chinese would still calculate with the abacus (many still do):

    https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/july-1949-chinese-man-calculating-with-abacus-as-he-makes-change-for-picture-id50866924

    • Disagree: GomezAdddams, annamaria, IronForge
    • Replies: @annamaria
  87. Schuetze says:

    “The Duchess made several charges. She said a member of the royal family worried her son Archie might be too “dark.””

    My guess is that Meghan is not even a Mulatto, but that she is a quadroon, one might even say Yaller. She is somewhere around 3/4 white, and that makes Archie an Octaroon, some where around 7/8’s white. Yet they still consider themselves negro.

    Interestingly Jewish quadroon or octaroons consider themselves to be white Europeans. At least that is what they claim to the goyim. Yet secretly they consider themselves to be Jews, since jews have managed to convince everyone that they are racially superior as well as gods chosen people.

    I bring this up because it illustrates how damaging race traitors are to their own people. What is clear is that once a white person creates a child of mixed blood, they in effect become outsiders to their own people who will always side with the other race, because to do otherwise would alienate their own spawn. Once a family has a mixed blood child, in effect they are no longer racially a member of the tribe.

    One of the biggest “crimes” of the NSDAP were the Nuremberg Laws. This defined precisely how pure German a person’s family had to be in order to be classified as a member of the German race and eligible for German citizenship. In this case Meghan would be called partly white, and Archie could be called white.

    In the Haitian Revolution in 1791-1800, the mulatto’s like Meghan sided with the negroes and help to murder all the whites on the island. Later, the pure negroes turned on the mulattos and murdered all of them too. The same kind of dynamic is going in in South Africa, where the mulattos were against Aparthied in the 1980’s, but over the years they have come to realize how brutal and hobbsian negro rule is, and they are pining for the good old days of apartheid.

    What I find fascinating here is that when push comes to shove, in the end, neither race wants the mulattos. This is why society is perfectly correct in frowning on mixed marriages and on bi-racial offspring. This is why the NSDAP was correct in writing the Nuremberg laws.

    • Thanks: Pheasant
  88. Dayglowd says:

    Every dog has its day…as the saying goes, even mulatto gold diggers.

    However, because a dog is born in a stable, the dog is not a horse, the dog is still a dog…which is where Harry is now in actuality since Prince Charles is NOT his father and his mother was just another gold digger like Harry’s mulatto.

    So Harry is really where he should be if justice is to be served: a nobody married to a mulatto nobody fascinated with materialism, status and self-righteous indignation.

    The Queen betrayed her wedding vows that required her to protect the nation (her nation refers to the people) from alien infiltration and attack.

    But then you have to realise that the House of Windsor are Jews and Zionists. They let the House of Windsor owned City of London to the Rothschilds in perpetuity and take a cut from the laundered profits from slavery, drug running and the debt slavery of her people in return.

    The House of Windsor is just another gold-digging scam used to exploit the poor, the weak and the vulnerable British. It deserved Megan Markle because they are birds of a feather. And as the saying goes…’birds of a feather stick together!’

    Whether the House of Windsor survives or not does not matter. The important thing is how soon the House of Rothschild is destroyed because the former is just the PR arm of the latter.

    Consequently this naive article must be seen for what it is…an inability to perceive the truth from amongst the lies.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  89. AndrewR says:
    @GeeBee

    Kate’s a Jew?

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  90. Anon[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Who is this Francis II? Kindly put up a link.

  91. AndrewR says:
    @Dumbo

    Harry looks way too much like Philip for me to assume he’s a bastard. But the resemblance to Hewitt is uncanny.

  92. Fred777 says:
    @Alexander Turok

    The Afghans did not start the fight, but they did win it.

  93. Harry’s mother, Diana Spencer, was a bit nutty and rebellious to boot. She set the precedent by shacking up with the mulatto Dodi Fayed and in the end got killed with him. Now her darling boy is following in her footsteps which doesn’t bode too well for all concerned. Harry Windsor is an idiot and Meghan Markle is a harlot!

  94. Ugetit says:

    The monarchy is seductive…

    What?

    Try repulsive*.

    *See comment #90.

  95. Z-man says:
    @WorkingClass

    His Royal Cuck would be a more suitable title.
    Ah if only Pippa, the sister-in-law of William, had not rejected the advances of ‘randy Harry’ we wouldn’t have had any of this ‘quadroon’s’ (Markel’s) bs.

    • Replies: @CCG
  96. CCG says:
    @Z-man

    His choice of Meghan Markle as girlfriend, and then wife, doesn’t line up with his previous choices (he seemed to prefer blondes):
    https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/g14383928/prince-harry-ex-girlfriends-dating-history-relationships/

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  97. Truth says:
    @Father O'Hara

    Silly, girly things like this are beneath my comprehension, Old Sport.

  98. @Dutch Boy

    Drivel. Elizabeth II is the legitimate successor of the Stuarts. All the other Stuart “claimants” are obscure European aristocrats with no claims to legitimacy whatsoever. Elizabeth II may be Elizabeth the Useless, as Sean Gabb has aptly called her, but she will probably be the last legitimate monarch.

    The alternative is not some obscure illegitimate Continental. There is no support for that whatsoever. Nor will the alternative be a Republic. The monarchy is far too useful to the English political class. A Republic would likely lead to the quick break-up of Britain, and the loss of status for that class.

    The future will see a continued diminution and fading away of the monarchy, probably like modern Scandinavia. Political functions that remain will more and more be in the hands of the Speaker of the House of Commons or similar officials. The monarchy will be completely ceremonial and bereft of any political agency.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  99. @AceDeuce

    But we have known about the problem for half a millennium

    Or two and a half millennia
    https://www.amazon.com/s?k=aristophanes+assemblywomen&crid=2TE0ZVMVXQQNM&sprefix=aristophanes%3A+assembly%2Caps%2C234&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_21

    But it never gets taught in schools.

  100. @Dutch Boy

    Be careful,Dutch, they may try to kill her and wipe out the line…

  101. Schuetze says:
    @Biff

    I was like riding a roller coaster all the way to the bottom, and then you click on the [more]

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  102. moi says:
    @Dutch Boy

    The very idea of royalty is laughable.

    • Agree: TKK
  103. Iris says:
    @AndrewR

    I think Harry blackmailed the family with the threat of a nasty exposé if they didn’t assent to his marriage.

    It is very much the contrary.
    In English nationalist circles about 10 years ago, it was already discussed how Harry was being pressured by the Queen to marry a Black women.

    Such a marriage was a way for the British Royals, ever smart at PR, to embrace the “multicultural” 21st Century, remain relevant and above all maintain their soft power over the “coloured” Commonwealth countries in the future. Harry acquiesced with enthusiasm because, like the rest of the family, they are attention-seekers who pretend not to care but die for official roles.

    Their problem is that they couldn’t agree on how to share the public’s attention between them.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  104. Emslander says:
    @Mark Tapley

    Jefferson as ambassador to France was acquainted with most of European Royalty and he stated that none of them would be fit to serve in the lowest elected office in Virginia.

    And aren’t we about finished sending young men to fight their wars for them? My grandfathers ruined their lives for their lies in WWI and my father was never the same after WWII and died fifteen years after it ended.

    I have no allegiance to the gelded WASPS or their royal cutouts. They get what they richly deserve.

    I happily did everything I could to avoid killing Vietnamese young men. I was successful in my shirking. These WASP wars expose Americans as fools. Now they have us wearing masks while driving.

  105. Truth says:
    @AceDeuce

    Laugh if you want, but those stupid, brainwashed b!tches are what got Clinton, Obama, and Biden elected.

    1- Do you have daughters?

    2- Did you raise them with a Khazar Indoctrination Box in your home?

    3- Great, STFU.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @AceDeuce
  106. Diversity is white genocide.

    The goal of organized jewry is to wipe out the white race by any means necessary.

    The push for race mixing is simply another tool of the zionist overlords.

    • Agree: John Q Duped
  107. Truth says:
    @Thomasina

    A juvenile, self-centered, narcissistic, who-can-I-blame-for-my-own-lack-of-character culture. Meghan Markle is a perfect representative.

    Again; as are you for paying attention to this foolishness.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  108. Malibu says:

    There might be a overpass column with Megan’s name on it.

  109. Culpepper says:
    @AndrewR

    The pictures may have been tweeked by photoshop

  110. GeeBee says:
    @AndrewR

    Indeed she is. As you’ll know, Jewishness is matrilineal. Her father is a gentile, but her mother is most definitely Jewish, and therefore so will be King George VII.

    • Agree: Iris
  111. Truth says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    I would agree with you except that it’s usually not an eunuch type male that concerns himself with women’s business. Instead, women are in general a great concern of genuine men and as seems to be the case, that’s how most women genuine women have preferred it thru the ages.

    Well, No, “Dr.” I would gander a guess that genuine men are not concerned with what Oprah had on her TV show last night. Although I admit that I am old and things are changing rapidly.

    Back in my day the 5 gayist things a man could do would have been as follows:

    1. Watch Oprah

    2. Suck cock

    3. Be the willing recipient (or, in some circles, including mine, but not all, donor) of anal sex

    4. Worry about what some family of inbred, welfare recipients was doing with their lives

    5. Spend his time hand-wringing over who some dude he is not related to, and doesn’t know, married.

    Now, Old Sport, whenever I go to my Mother’s house to take her to lunch she has that Oprah Winfrey channel on, she tries to get me to sit there and get engaged with whatever the subject matter is; and I couldn’t tell you because I start squirming aft 42 seconds and make some excuse about having to work later. Let’s just say her attempts fall upon deaf ears.

    Now, I’ve actually witness my mother doing 1,4 and 5 above; not just once, but often; and as much as it pains me, I would assume she has done 2 and 3 also.

    But you see, Old Sport; she’s a BROAD. A 77 year-black one from Harlem as well, I expect it and love her anyway. So there it is, your constituency.

    The only comment that I have read here that reeks of the era I grew up in is #19. Please read it again.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  112. @Anonymous

    Ok, DO NOT click this link. I don’t want to be responsible for you having a stroke. But, others might want to see what you’re talking about and this gives a good idea.

    https://tinyurl.com/2d8nafjc

    Of course, just install ‘Meghan Markle’s feet’ into http://www.images.google.com and one can go wild oogling her hoofs.

  113. Sidney says:
    @Mark Tapley

    Mark Tapley is right on the target because he is sure to get a lot of flak for his truthisms. An excellent reply Mark. You are one of the few to put history in its correct context. As a Canadian I can say, that for us historically, the attachment to Britain paid off beautifully in the 19th century by barring an American invasion(in fact defeating one 1812-14), and allowing us time to develop our own country. But that attachment got us, Australia and New Zealand dragged into WW1 without our say, even though Britain was primarily responsible for WW1. Should we have gone republican after Victoria? – perhaps. You are also quite correct about WW2, a war that should never have occurred, except for the Zionist Jew money handlers manufacturing a war against a country, Germany, that desired peace. Now look at the chaos and degeneration of European civilization due to Churchill’s desire for war instead of peace. As for Markel’s statements on a royal talking about what colour the baby will be, if you can believe her, so what? Parents of mixed marriages everywhere have asked the same question. But of course virtue signaling and “racism” are the trendy buzz-words of today’s media.

  114. Marckus says:

    When Harry got some blond snatch it was probably a dull performance. However, when he got a taste of Markle’s chocolate snapper the poor fellow lost his mind and could not think clearly. She must have really worked over the royal staff.

    If Harry had called me I would have told him a white man with an ounce of sense does not marry a black woman especially one whose hole has been filled up by other men. A clever bachelor is a ruthless one who keeps the dark meat on the side. She will do as she is told because she desperately wants to be with the white man hoping he will feel merciful and give her the white seed thus diluting the Congo blood. Black women consider this a privilege ! Even Al Sharpton for all his bombast is not as black as black should be. Somewhere in his past a white man invaded one of his ancestors and made a deposit.

    In Harry’s case Markle could have been kept on a string and called up whenever the Prince needed his pipes cleaned by a professional plumber.

    Megan sicced the black pussy on him and made both heads spin. You can be born into royalty, you can go to Eton, Oxford or whatever, you can have titles and privilege, but you can also be dumb and weak. A cunt is a fucking ugly thing to look at, a black one more so. Harry looked at one and got blinded. In the land of the blind the one eyed man is King. In Harry’s case he is not, never will be and is in fact a nothing. What is even more demeaning is this Royal Couple grovelling before Oprah, an obese slob of an ugly black buffalo with a shaved head and a white woman’s wig. How desperate do you have to be for relevance !

    When I go to a chicken place I never ask for dark meat. My disdain for these people is such that only Grade A white flesh is placed before me. For those of you UR readers who like a little tender dark meat on the side take Marckus’ advice. Keep it on a string and when required bust it mercilessly. Like a cup, it is meant to be used, dried and put away for next time. Continually bear in mind though that at some time in the future someone like Ron Jeremy or even the BBC will also get a taste. This is inevitable especially with black women.

    But for heaven sake, don’t take it home to Mom and Dad or you will end up like…Dirty Harry !

    • LOL: AndrewR
  115. CCG says:
    @Iris

    Meghan Markle’s ex-husband (Trevor Engelson) is Jewish. She may have converted to Judaism from Protestantism at the time of her first marriage because they had a Jewish wedding ceremony in Jamaica. The ‘matchmaker’ who introduced her to Prince Harry (Misha Nonoo) is also Jewish.

  116. This whole saga is just like modern conservatism. We lost. The monarchy lost. To hell with fighting to save it. The leftie wokies want us to fight to save the remaining scraps of old. What they don’t want is to own anything as the current establishment. So let the Markles be the champion of the Commonwealth republican movement. Let the blacks think they got something thru an actress that was white enough to play a white character in a Hallmark movie no less. End the monarchy. Let the direct heirs like Chuckles ( who is likely responsible for the diversity push), Wills, and George get the spoils. Let the Hank and Meg be merely Mr. and Mrs. Markle. Then we can all place wagers how fast the divorce happens. Learn from the old and on with the new rebellion. Make our ancient ancestors proud for a change.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  117. Am I the only one who can see parallels between Megan’s privilege and Jewish privilege?
    Matter of fact, I welcome it. Let the Whites simmer and rage, let the pressure build up, and so when the deluge comes, we will have no holy cows we cannot criticize.

  118. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AndrewR

    We’ve still got 25+ more years of Charles, and ? more years of Liz.

    Not necessarily. In Britain, Parliament is sovereign. If it so decides, it could pass a Succession Act stipulating a mandatory retirement age for the monarch, say 65, whereupon the crown would pass directly to William.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    , @canspeccy
  119. Iris says:
    @GeeBee

    Indeed she is. As you’ll know, Jewishness is matrilineal. Her father is a gentile, but her mother is most definitely Jewish, and therefore so will be King George VII.

    Mrs Middleton, the future Queen Consort who made a marriage arranged out of the UK B’nai B’rith tribal registers, also is the most likely member of the Windsor family to have made the unfortunate comment that caused such outrage, hoping that Mrs Markle unborn baby’s skin wouldn’t be too dark.

    https://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/royals/prince-charles-prince-william-or-their-wives-made-comments-about-archies-skin-colour-claims-chris-ship/

    It is very interesting to see how, in these times of extreme Wokeness to the Left, and extreme Racialism to the Right, nobody from either side even dares outing her.
    Everybody knows their shitty little place whenever their Talmudist masters are at fault.

    • Thanks: Pheasant
    • Replies: @RedpilledAF
    , @canspeccy
  120. gotmituns says:
    @Schuetze

    Everybody has to do what they’re called to do.

  121. Anon[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @Truth

    Thank you. Amazing how some commenters feel zero solidarity with, or responsibility for, the women around them. Denigrating women, as if they were somehow a people apart, is like cutting your nose to spite your face.

    • Agree: Truth
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    , @AceDeuce
    , @Mike Tre
  122. AndrewR says:
    @Iris

    Look, I get why “the firm” might have wanted a coloured person to marry in, but Harry’s love for this witch is entirely authentic. He reminds him deeply of Diana, whose death devastated him. The similarities are obvious.

  123. @Iris

    It is all a Talmudic dialectic. Everything today seems to be.

  124. Meghan is not black. She probably is not even a musteefino. In the Old South if a person had “one drop of black blood” whites wanted to say that such a person was black and light-skinned blacks wanted to pass for white. Now, people who have one drop of black blood want to be considered black. Well, both extremes are wrong. We have the same kind of nonsense with “Latinos.” First of all, they are not a race. Most of these persons are of Hispanic ancestry and a quite substantial number of them, if not a majority, are strictly European. The same nonsense with all these claims that the white population in the United States has declined from more than 80% to less than 60%. The equation really hasn’t changed much at all. Only the perception.

    • Agree: Carroll Price
  125. TGD says:
    @anon

    Agree that Prince Charles is not Harry’s biological father, though palace propagandists say that Charles is. Has there been any independent proof that Charles is the father?

    Another candidate is Mark Dyer.

    • Agree: John Q Duped
  126. Sunshine says:
    @WorkingClass

    I just call him Harry Markle. The first woman in history to kiss a prince and turn him into a frog.

  127. IronForge says:

    Just a quick visit before going to work.

    Here’s Eddie Murphy’s snl sketch. Sorry I couldn’t find one without Subtitles.

  128. “A 2000 study found that blacks have higher self-esteem than whites”

    I hold zero positive views toward the British royals because bloodline monarchies are archaic and disgusting. And now their very existence gives even more power to “sacred” black supremacy. A race of violent narcissists with a record of micro and macro dysfunction seeking victim status is the kiss of death to western countries. Quite the monster our white elites have created.

  129. @Old and Grumpy

    Yes, this sad tale is a metaphor for the downfall of western man…..the nose using blacks (and other non-whites) to destroy everything that whites built over the last 2000 years.

    We are witnessing the triumph of organized jewry dancing on the graves of our ancestors.

    Prince Harry is typical white cuck bowing to the demands of the black golem created by the jews.

    So jewish BLM has infiltrated the bowels of Christendom and the cancer is terminal.

    And all we can do is watch in horror as everything turns to shit and the stench of death fills the air.

  130. annamaria says:
    @AceDeuce

    Actually, the “stupid brainwashed” voters have been skillfully used and agitated by the usual anti-western forces of Trotskyist’s flavor.

    Exhibit One is the spectacularly mediocre/woke publication by Isaac Chotiner, a staff writer at The New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/tag/meghan-markle
    It seems that the idea of M. Markle’s “incomparable victimhood” has deeply touched Mr. Chotiner heart. Never mind that the ignorant and promiscuous grifter Markle is a patent liar and hypocrite who suddenly discovered the profitability of being a” woman of color.” (This aged con-woman has never dated a single black man and avoided like a plague the “dark” side of her family). The wokes sympathize with Markle’s incomparable plight of being a very-very progressive “dutchess,” insanely fond of fame and other peoples’ money. Markle would kill to keep her white privilege of being a “dutchess” and having a set of servants to abuse.

    Enters the black billionaire Oprah to help the “suffering” millionaire Markle (who aspires to become a billionaire) with publicity and to add some fire to the BLM movement. The MSM has immediately voiced united support for Oprah/Markle idiocy.

    The New Yorker, a previously stellar magazine in which the best and brightest used to publish their creations, has been captured and totally defiled by wokes and the ZUSA’s propagandists such as Masha Gessen and David Remnick. They take sadistic pleasure in ruining western civilization.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  131. geokat62 says:

    … the British are learning that integration doesn’t strengthen an institution. It hollows it out and may even destroy it…

    If Harry has set in motion the abolition of the monarchy…

    Harry?

    The Jewish Matchmaker Who Introduced Meghan Markle And Prince Harry

    https://forward.com/fast-forward/388547/meghan-markle-prince-harry-jewish-matchmaker-misha-nonoo/

    • Agree: IronForge
  132. annamaria says:
    @Dumbo

    Yes, they deserve each other. The “righteous” Ayaan Hirsi Ali happened to be an opportunist and liar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali

    In May 2006 the TV programme Zembla reported that Hirsi Ali had given false information about her name, her age, and her country of residence when originally applying for asylum. In her asylum application, she had claimed to be fleeing a forced marriage, but the Zembla coverage featured interviews with her family, who denied that claim. The program alleged that, contrary to Hirsi Ali’s claims of having fled a Somali war zone, the MP had been living comfortably in upper middle-class conditions safely in Kenya with her family for at least 12 years before she sought refugee status in the Netherlands in 1992.

    • Agree: Mulga Mumblebrain
  133. Miro23 says:

    Altogether a good article.

    In the honor culture that the monarchy emerged from, strength and duty justify power. In our modern culture, claims of victimhood are the path to power. Today, we’re seeing the conflict between victim culture and honor culture.

    Victimhood is more of a fabrication to divide and break (Anglo) society. The real source of power lies with the media who orchestrate the “victimhood” drama and define who is the “victim” and who is the “oppressor” – straight out of the Bolshevik playbook.

    Queen Elizabeth II does her duty. She carries herself with quiet dignity. It’s her job. She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy.

    The Queen and her family know better than anyone that they’re powerless, and have to shut up (act with dignity).

    But if the sovereign can’t fight against the physical replacement of her people, there’s no point in having a sovereign. If she has failed, it’s because she held to her duty — never to take a political position — to the end.

    The Royal Family are a popular tourist attraction. It’s not much, but at least it earns foreign exchange revenue.

    You can criticize the Queen even in the most vulgar terms and face no legal sanctions, but don’t criticize non-whites or you may be arrested.

    Power lies with the “victimhood” orchestrators (mostly the Jewish run media and their team of Wokes )

    There is only one way to win the diversity game. Don’t play. You are racist no matter what you do. If you are a racist for keeping your institutions white, at least you still have institutions.

    Avoid the race baiters. Don’t play and keep as far away as possible.

    If the Windsors are swept away…, conservatives, nationalists, and Traditionalists will no longer be blinded by nostalgia. Something new can be built. That’s better than slow-motion collapse presided over by a figurehead with no power or purpose.

    From this POV the Royal Family are actually co-operating in Britain’s decline and are themselves part of the problem.

    • Replies: @canspeccy
  134. AndrewR says:
    @TheTrumanShow

    What he’s obviously saying is that knowing someone’s race tells you very little that you can be certain of but it tells you a lot that you can reasonably bet on.

  135. canspeccy says: • Website
    @Iris

    Who cares who questioned the color of Archie’s skin?

    Why shouldn’t someone question the color of Archie’s skin?

    What if they’d questioned whether he’d have red hair?

    Would that have been a racist crime against white people, or what?

    That large numbers of people appear to care what Meghan and Harry are moaning about indicates the imbecility of the Western world.

    It’s time to remember the old English saying that “Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

    It’s time to restore the right of free speech and tell Meghan and Harry and every other cretinous politically correct idiot to go piss up a rope.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  136. AndrewR says:
    @CanSpeccy

    There is 0.000000% chance of that happening

  137. annamaria says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    You are funny.

    The 2018 U.S. International Mathematical Olympiad team is: Adam Ardeishar, Andrew Gu, Vincent Huang, James Lin, Michael Ren, and Mihir Singhal.

    If you still believe in your Jewish superiority, here is some more important information:

    Mathematics in China emerged independently by the 11th century BC. The Chinese independently developed a real number system that includes significantly large and negative numbers, more than one numeral system (base 2 and base 10), algebra, geometry, number theory and trigonometry.

    • Agree: Iris, Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  138. AndrewR says:
    @Anon

    What else can we do? We can’t beat/intimidate all women into submission. And we can’t reason most of them into it either. Insults seem to be as good a tool as any. And frankly there is no shortage of men who ho around YASS QUEENing demons like Hillary and Kamala. They deserve far worse than their female supporters.

  139. wootendw says:

    “A post-Brexit United Kingdom could retain relevance by strengthening ties with the white nations it created, with the monarch as the unifying symbol.”

    Britain competes with ‘white’ EU nations, such as Germany, in the export of finished goods. The Biden and Obama administrations, which opposed Brexit, prefer this arrangement which is detrimental to Britain. What Britain ought to do is to open up trade with ‘white’ Russia instead.

    A trade relationship between Britain and Russia would advantageous to both as Russia has raw materials Britain needs to manufacture goods that Russia needs. Such a trade relationship would make Britain less dependent on the US and EU. All they need to do is lift the sanctions on Russia and kick out Bill Browder.

    • Agree: Skeptikal
  140. canspeccy says: • Website
    @Miro23

    The Queen and her family know better than anyone that they’re powerless, and have to shut up (act with dignity).

    But if the sovereign can’t fight against the physical replacement of her people, there’s no point in having a sovereign. If she has failed, it’s because she held to her duty — never to take a political position — to the end.

    The Royal Family are a popular tourist attraction. It’s not much, but at least it earns foreign exchange revenue.

    The British monarch is, technically, not powerless. The residual powers of the monarch provide considerable potential leverage. But with respect to the physical replacement of the British people by people from elsewhere (an inevitable result of below replacement fertility of the indigenous people combined with mass immigration), the Queen almost certainly, and Charles, definitely, does not care.

    Charles, soon to be king unless Parliament acts to forestall his coronation, is a globalist and a shill for the New World Order who is clearly more concerned about global warming than about the fate of the native race upon whose backs he rides.

  141. @Truth

    I could agree with much of what you have written but “Old Sport”, really, that phrase was irritating even when the Great Gadsby constantly used it. Peace.

  142. TKK says:

    If this is not an orchestrated maelstrom in a teacup to distract from the false economy of a $ 1.9TRILLION dollar Covid Relief Bill that only includes 9% toward COVID relief–

    and the fact that Joe Biden is deep in a dementia, medicated haze and has no idea what is happening around him-

    it serves as a benchmark from the inescapable fact:

    blacks and their handlers cannot live in the West. It is the definitive proof that blacks must be expelled from America.

    For you have a stupid slutty nobody: twice divorced, freckled, mole covered average looking 40 year old unknown thirsty actress of mixed race who stridently identifies as black. Her acting ability was non existent, she is way past her prime date and she is barely articulate. She had plastic surgery to mask her negroid nose and she starves herself to be thin.

    Notwithstanding all of this:

    The UK gave her a 35 million dollar wedding.
    The UK gave her a 15 million dollar mansion then paid for a total gutting and refurbishment.
    The UK gave her a royal title.
    The World gave her thousands of positive, slobbering headlines.
    The UK gave her an entire private section at Wimbleton.
    Saudi Princes gave her $2 million earrings.
    Celebrities give her their private jets to flounce around the world and receive more gifts that could lift entire families out of poverty.

    And through all this largess, this staggering generosity and turning a blind eye to her slutty, stupid past-

    she still hates whites and is fixated on race.

    There is nothing more the Royal family could have done to make her feel welcome and special. Prince Charles has been “woke” for years. He was probably thrilled his jug head dummy son married this deranged repellent parasite. This is more than a gossipy Crown watcher dust up.

    Whether it be the Jews, spineless whites or the innate narcissism of most blacks who insist on treating blacks like Supreme Beings above reproach , this will never work.

    The only path to saving America is to send all blacks back to Sub Sahara Africa.

    However, this will never happen. Any truth about blacks is labeled as obscene ( See the Georgetown Professor FIRED for stating blacks were always at the bottom of the class).

    The sector of our Western economy that contribute the least, and extract the most have been painted as magical, wise and gifted- but at the same time cowering in fear from the whip of the White Man.

    Time to file for asylum as a political refuge in Poland, Hungary, Russia, Singapore.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  143. @Dutch Boy

    I have a friend who comes from the Tilney family who were one of the most important family of the Plantagenets.
    His grandfather passed away before he was to be knighted.

    https://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cmricha/fam304.html

  144. Thomasina says:
    @Truth

    Sorry, I don’t actually follow her or the foolishness surrounding her, no more than I would a 20-car pileup on the I5 or Jeffrey Epstein. But it is important to observe who is being painted as the latest “victim” in society, and whether the painting is a comedy or a serious work of art.

    The reason the country is in the state it’s in is because people have not been observing or, if they have, they have not pushed back. For the few who have spoken up, they’ve been labelled anti-semitic, racist, conspiracy theorist, sexist, homophobic, anything to shut them up. And now you are telling me that I shouldn’t really be responding to the latest fool that Oprah is trying desperately to shape society with, and if I do, then I am just like them?

    Human behavior is a very interesting topic, one I have actually paid close attention to. In my opinion, Meghan Markle is a highly manipulative, narcissistic person who used her sex appeal to try to get something for nothing. She is now pulling the racism and victim card in order to keep it.

    Believe me, she is paying; she just doesn’t know it yet. It always costs. Unfortunately, the carnage left behind will be ugly.

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Replies: @Truth
  145. @annamaria

    Still, China’s “rise” in modern times is mainly imitation of western technologies.

    Here are two pictures, highly symbolic of that fact:

    1) Imitation “Eifel Tower”:

    https://i.insider.com/51fbac9d6bb3f76d15000007?width=1200

    2) Imitation “Leaning Tower of Pisa”:

    As they say in China: “Chinkey see, Chinkey do”.

  146. canspeccy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    There is 0.000000% chance of that happening

    If everyone’s is as unconcerned about Charles becoming King as, apparently, you are, then you’re right, nothing will be done to prevent it.

    I suggest, however, that it only requires one prominent person, say Nigel Farage, to start the log rolling and a mandatory retirement age for the British Monarch could easily become an election issue.

  147. geokat62 says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    1) Imitation “Eifel Tower”:

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  148. Miro23 says:
    @canspeccy

    The British monarch is, technically, not powerless. The residual powers of the monarch provide considerable potential leverage.

    I suppose that what power they have, really comes from the historic tradition they represent, and the fact that they’re very much in the public eye.

    So, given that they’re likely on the way out – it may occur to them to go out fighting (or maybe it won’t). The heads of the RF are the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William. The Queen is too old and is failing with Harry, and Charles just isn’t that way – so that only leaves William and Catherine.

    If they made the miraculous statement that Great Britain is the historic home of the British people (English, Scots and Welsh) and that the British people should hold political power because of their ethnic identity (with others welcome as long term guests) – they would surely get massive public support.

    Then they could be looking at the Restoration of the monarchy or more likely the guillotine.

    • Replies: @canspeccy
  149. canspeccy says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I think it’s perfectly sensible and, in fact an ingenious solution to a massive problem, for the Chinese to simulate the marvels of European culture at home in China. That way, billions of tons of carbon emissions and trillions in Chinese currency reserves are saved as the result of reduced foreign travel.

    For long, indeed, I have thought this should be a generally adopted policy, i.e., to make the homeland and, in particular, your home town, a truly attractive place to be, thereby vastly reducing the massive expenditure of resources on leisure travel.

  150. profnasty says:
    @advancedatheist

    If you feed a hungry dog, he won’t bite you.
    That is the difference between (*) men and dogs.
    – Sam Clemons
    * Black

  151. @advancedatheist

    Apparently you don’t live in this world. If I had a nickel for every utterly incompetent ignorant boob white person I’ve had to deal with in the last year, I’d be rich.

    This is not to say that blacks are competent. Nope. Nobody’s “competent.” Blacks are just as incompetent as whites. Equality in action.

    • LOL: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @hillaire
    , @Marylou
  152. @SafeNow

    I would not have called Markle an “actor.” She is an “actress.”

    No, she is a “soft-porn actress”.

    • Agree: Franz
  153. @Emslander

    I happily did everything I could to avoid killing Vietnamese young men.

    Happily avoided killing the ones who’d walked hundreds of miles to kill their own brethren? Get straight and don’t allude to having been there, when in fact you were ‘happily’ not.

    • Troll: stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @John Q Duped
  154. @The Soft Parade

    Sure sounds to me like he was in Vietnam. Do you think he did all he could to keep from killing Vietnamese here in the states or on a Caribbean Island? OR maybe other things he wrote you didn’t like. Are we a troll for and of the tribe?

    • Agree: Iris
  155. British Royal family now is like your porcelain adornments in your vitrine,

  156. hillaire says:

    Indeed, the problem with multiracialism is an existential one for the blacks, and to a lesser degree for all brown people… for as they can only define themselves in contrast to white europeans and as they seek to exist within our culture they will never represent more than a people of no real consequence…

    This is now an existential problem for european cultures… as we seek to carry and uplift a group of peoples unable to do this for themselves and who when faced with what amounts to significant social failure will only bring destruction and hatred down upon what they in truth have no right to be even a part of. Hence the erazing whiteness gibberish so fashionable amongst the black imbeciles and jewish academicians.

    No one has ‘rights’ to somebody else’s homeland, that is just nonsense peddled by opportunistic interlopers running a shakedown… they want you to support them and their offspring whilst offering little if any benefit… and no doubt want you totally marginalized…. and eventually eradicated.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  157. canspeccy says: • Website
    @Miro23

    I suppose that what power they have, really comes from the historic tradition they represent, and the fact that they’re very much in the public eye.

    So, given that they’re likely on the way out …

    All human institutions are finite, but the British monarchy has proved to be a stayer, more than one thousand years old, if we ignore Cromwellian interruption.

    As to the powers of the monarchy, these are well defined, and include the power of the Royal Assent. The fact that the monarch has not blocked legislation since 1707 does not mean that they cannot do so. Indeed, the fact that the power to refuse the royal assent has not been used for so long, would add greatly to the impact on the public of a refusal of assent now.

    The problem with the current Royal Family is that their views are in line with those of the globalist elite that seeks to destroy the nation state and create a system of global governance that would eliminate control over the international movement of capital, labor, technology and taxable profits. That’s why they were thrilled when Harry married a “woman of color,” it was very anti-nationalist.

    Were the residual powers of the monarch deployed in opposition to mass immigration, it would greatly increase the popularity, and hence the security of the institution, in a country where opinion polls for 20 years or more have indicated a very large majority (generally 65-75%) opposed to mass immigration. There have been polls showing that even the majority of immigrants to Britain oppose mass immigration, which in a country with a population density of around two people per acre (in England), is not surprising.

    • Replies: @Rocha
  158. Truth says:
    @Thomasina

    But it is important to observe who is being painted as the latest “victim” in society, and whether the painting is a comedy or a serious work of art.

    Is it? Why? Do you have some brilliant plot to combat the Great Khazar Woke Takeover? Excellent! That makes you rare amongst Gentiles, and let me tell you Old Sport (or Sportette), now would be a CAPITAL time to unveil it, because we have already tried gossiping impotently on a website, and, well, you see the results before you…

    Once again, I will refer back to my earlier post;

    Do you, Mr. (Or Miss) Thomasina have a Khazar Indoctrination Box in your home?

    Great, then STFU, you are part of the problem, not part of the cure (I do not own one by the way).

    The reason the country is in the state it’s in is because people have not been observing or, if they have, they have not pushed back.

    No, the reason the country is in the state it it’s in, is because you have been observing, instead of ignoring, which is what I do, and what I implore others to do, and what I do on this site. If a tree falls in the forest…?

    No Old Sport (Or Sportette), you are arrogant, that is your problem. You feel you have earned the right to accept some forms of Khazar brainwashing, while simultaneously rejecting others. I’m sorry it does not, and never will work like that.

    In my opinion, Meghan Markle is a highly manipulative, narcissistic person…

    Great, then this person fits in perfectly with a family of inbred welfare rats, so what are you worrying about?

    My Friends, this Markele person just by coincidence just happend to be involved personally in a campaign that spoke to each of you PERSONALLY. The Log Line says it all…

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  159. @TheTrumanShow

    I’ll go more fundamentally gobbly-gook then: the Schrödinger equation predicts the behaviour of a group of atoms, but can say nothing about any one individual atom of the group.

    This is the point – you can compare group with group, but using a group statistic to extrapolate what an individual of that group will be like is prone to unforced error.

    It is enough to say that black males on average commit homicide more than white males. Policy and culture can work to improve the situation just from that.

    • Replies: @DrWatson
  160. Sean says:

    Prince Harry may well be Charles’s son, but the overall impression in profile bears a surprising resemblance to his mother’s lover James Hewett. Harry’s nose is much more like Hewitt’s rather convex nose in shape and size rather that either of his big high bridged nosed parents. Harry’s exploits (as a child sticking his hand up the jumper his nanny and grabbing her breasts, heavy drinking and smoking weed before he was 18, getting photographed nude in Vegas after stripping in front of women he hardly knew) would be less odd were he actually the son of the feckless womanizing Hewitt. I suspect the royal family, rightly or wrongly, are not too surprised at the way he turned out.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  161. hillaire says:
    @obwandiyag

    Come now, you wont get rich begging on street corners… even for a year.

  162. The true ruling family of the Yiddish Empire is the Rothschild Royal family. The Goyal family is all pomposity and no circumstance. They are nothing more than Rothschild’s pathetic puppets and show room dummies. The Mulatto Monarchy’s infamous betrayal of their Anglo Saxon heritage at the behest of the Rothschild Reich’s instigation of WWII cost England her Empire. Almost immediately after Isramerica’s dismantling of her empire, the Rothschild Royal Family decreed a policy of anti white REVERSE COLONIALISM and financed a decades long non white migrant invasion. All white Englishmen were to be vilified and humiliated with FORCED integration and to culminate in genocidal miscegenation. There is now only one party in Zionist Globalist England, the Zionist Laboratory Party (a party of Sad Dicks Conmen. To true patriotic ethno nationalists I say, YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO FIGHT TO BE WHITE.

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Malla
  163. Emslander says:
    @John Q Duped

    Again, I happily avoided killing any Vietnamese and I don’t care what they were doing. I didn’t allude to being there and I consider our nation to be forever shamed for sending any of our boys there to do so. None of our adventures across the oceans in the twentieth century were necessary or honorable.

    I claim enjoyment in not having been sent. I’m sorry that you somehow have the need to justify that mistake.

    • Replies: @Iris
  164. Emslander says:
    @John Q Duped

    I was NOT in Vietnam. What sick need do you have for raising the issue. I’m sorry for whatever caused that sickness.

  165. Emslander says:
    @John Q Duped

    You one of the gelded WASPS?

  166. Franz says:
    @canspeccy

    The British monarch is, technically, not powerless. The residual powers of the monarch provide considerable potential leverage.

    I was about to note; but hesitated because my information is very old.

    A half-century ago this year, I was in the US Navy at the Atlantic Fleet staff that included, by NATO agreement, officers from various allies. One was a Royal Navy mid-ranking career officer and we had some illuminating discussions.

    Various things were going on then (Ireland restive, etc) and his opinion of the representatives in Parliament was horribly negative. Simply, he was angry with them and one day came out and told me something that’s stuck with me ever since.

    “My oath as an officer is to the Queen, not to those (XXX) in their bunker. The Queen can abolish Parliament and order up another that will do the job right. She should.”

    What was bugging him that day I don’t know. But I checked (1971, admittedly) and he was right.

    My take is that in extraordinary circumstances the monarchy, just by commanding the serious loyalty of the people, could do plenty if they wanted. They could not rule by dictat, maybe, but they could greatly influence events if they wanted.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @CanSpeccy
  167. Garliv says:
    @GeeBee

    Kate’s a Jew? How reliable is your source. It seems to be an important fact that is not known (assuming it’s true).
    For Meghan/Harry unfolding debacle, one hope Prince will overcome his infatuation after arrival of their second child. He seems to have lost his head to Meghan who in turn is being a true American celebrity: get as much publicity, relevance and deals before age and use overtakes.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  168. hillaire says:
    @Gordo

    Ha ha .. apparently the 19th century froggies couldn’t distinguish between the so called british aristos and eastern euro schmata men, there is much written about this all of it true and highly entertaining…

    I think it likely there is much jew blood in the ‘windsors’ themselves, also the spencers and goldsmiths are jewish lines, now nicely mixed with some african bantu..

  169. GeeBee says:
    @Garliv

    It’s enough of a fact to have brought a huge reaction from the British Board of Jewish Deputies, who, on the birth of Prince George, were cock-a-hoop over the prospect of a British sovereign finally being a Jew. There is no debate about this (although, perhaps understandably, the MSM hasn’t made a point of reporting it).

    • Replies: @Anon
  170. Richard B says:
    @advancedatheist

    the current attack on whiteness, white supremacy, white nationalism and so forth are really attacks on a people who are just more competent at the job of flourishing than most other populations.

    But that’s just it. Whites aren’t allowed to flourish. Especially White men.

    Hence the civilizational collapse we’re all living through now. And make no mistake, there will be no pause in the fall. It’s going down. Of course it’s terrible and sad.

    But it’s idle to complain about it.

    And, while we’re on the topic of inherited royalty, it’s exactly because psychotic arrogance and self-awareness don’t go together that Woke Inc. doesn’t see that they’ve inherited far more than they can manage. So obessed with infiltration and subrverion, for the sole purpose of acquiring power, they haven’t given a second thought to what goes into maintaining that power once they have it. The result?

    They’re no good at managing the very social institutions their power now controls.

    That’s why what we’re really witnessing is The Pyrrhic Victory of Woke Inc.

  171. “There is only one way to win the diversity game. Don’t play. You are racist no matter what you do.”

    Exactly. I learnt this years ago.
    Can’t remember who said it, but their quote was that they were going to try to make the West so “diverse”, that only staunch white supremacists will resist — who have been made criminal pariahs.

    Well, I guess I’m going to be a criminal pariah til the end.

  172. @annamaria

    There is a difference between intra-cultural and extra-cultural imitation. The former is simply continuing the same cultural tradition, the latter is imitating-without-understanding.

    Since you admire authentic Chinese culture so much, here is a picture of the age-old Chinese tradition of the SPITTOON, used by Mao during Nixon’s visit:

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  173. Marckus says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    That’s strange. Chinaman, Chieh , Mulga Mumble Jumno and other CCP interlopers on this site are always pimping Chinese intelligence. Yet they want to build the white man’s marvels in China ? It even puzzles me why they would want to by peeping toms on this site which is a white site. The logic of these people astounds me. Maybe that is why when Henry Ford was rolling off his Model Ts these highly intellectual people were still upgrading the Sedan chair.

    I see a similarity here between Chinks and Chimps. The Chimps play too much scrabble and their brains end up in a scramble. Then Dr Cheesewala tries to convince us they have high IQ’s.

    Chinks play too much majong and their brains end up with ding dong. Then we have Dr Chieh and his scrawny bros with their crooked teeth and coke bottle glasses trying to also convince us of Chinese superiority.

    Is that what you meant by Chimps see, Chinks do ? Oh sorry I got that wrong. Or should it be Chinkey Doo Doo ?

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
  174. @hillaire

    I wish there was an ‘Evil Tripe’ button for this sort of hate-crazed lunacy.

    • Replies: @hillaire
    , @Mike Tre
    , @Marckus
  175. @canspeccy

    If anthropogenic climate destabilisation is not forestalled, then Charles’ ‘race’ will go extinct. The human race, that is.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  176. @canspeccy

    Yes, absolutely, what’s wrong with discussing skin colour? Since nowadays everything is being quantified, I propose that the science of skin colorimetry introduce numeric, alphabetic, or alphanumeric codes to precisely designate skin hue and start assigning them to people, and babies, in tests. These could then also be used to charachterize the performance of various skin whitening products so adored by women in the Far East, and by some Africans and other blacks, even men from what I can tell. Perhaps even to be used by tanning salons to specify how many sessions of what duration and price will achieve a specified hue. Yeah, big deal. So someone exclaimed: “By Jove we’ll have a golliwog in the family!” So what?

    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  177. @annamaria

    Don’t get me on about Masha Gessen. Transgender I can feel compassion for, but trans-species-there I draw the line.

  178. @Gordo

    Personally as a Canadian I would love to see my country leave the British commonwealth altogether and become a republic just like Ireland did in 1948. Ironically one of the major reasons Canada adopted a non-white immigration platform in the 1960’s was that supposedly it would make the country popular and more effective in the British Commonwealth. The whole idea was a half-baked act of nonsense.

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  179. @Mark Tapley

    Kipling was all for the pointless WW1. His son was exempted from serving because he was extremely near sighted. Kipling used his political influence to get him into the “meatgrinder” anyways. Kipling was a willing parrot for the British government and its anti-German propaganda. He only changed his tune AFTER the death of his son.

  180. Iris says:
    @Emslander

    Again, I happily avoided killing any Vietnamese and I don’t care what they were doing

    God bless you for your peace message. Outside of the USA, the only thing people remember of the Vietnam war is the US military burning Vietnamese kids with napalm.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  181. @GeeBee

    Her mother’s mother’s maiden name was Dorothy Harrison.

  182. Fred777 says:

    Complain to this royal about his white privilege.

  183. @Iris

    And Agent Orange. But don’t post any images of the Viet dioxin babies – too harrowing. Or please do under a More tag if any of these American apologists need convincing, to ponder how they would feel if some of their children ended up looking so because of some foreign power from half way around the globe.

    • Agree: annamaria
  184. Hibernian says:
    @orionyx

    The post Stuart monarchs owe their crowns to a law passed by Parliament stating that no Catholic could inherit The Crown. Their royal station is the gift of Parliament, backed up by the invading military forces accompanying the usurper William of Orange.

  185. Hibernian says:
    @Mark Tapley

    (mother Jenny Jacobson)

    Jenny Jerome. Having a banker father and a street named after the family in the Bronx doesn’t make her Jewish.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  186. @Commentator Mike

    “…I propose that the science of skin colorimetry introduce numeric, alphabetic, or alphanumeric codes to precisely designate skin hue and start assigning them to people, and babies, in tests…”

    A scientific scale of skin colors already exists. It is called the von Luschan’s chromatic scale, which can be found in the Wikipedia article Human Skin Color. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  187. @Hibernian

    Her father was of French Huguenot descent, and not Jewish at all.

    • Thanks: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Mark Tapley
  188. annamaria says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    You were presented already with information about China’s progress in math (11th century BC) and the bestest crop of young mathematicians in the US (Chinese, Koreans, and Indians). This is the US team of young mathematicians in 2019:

    Some of the Chinese contributions to world civilization: Papermaking, gun powder, printing, compass, Seismograph, blast furnace.

    The greatest western contribution to China in the 19th century: http://islam-radio.net/islam/english/jewishp/china/jews-hongkong-sassoon.htm
    Sassoon’s Use British Army to Drug An Entire Nation:

    The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China. “He employed only Jews in his business.”

    Sassoon’s sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China. Between 1830 – 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government. In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in coastal cities became endemic.

    In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. … An outraged David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate. Thus, the Opium Wars began with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839 with the signing of “The Treaty of Nanking.” This included provisions especially designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population with opium. The “peace treaty” included these provisions: “1) Full legalization of the opium trade in China, 2) compensation from the opium stockpiles confiscated by Lin of 2 million pounds, 3) territorial sovereignty for the British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

    Today, the US enjoys the Sackler family of profiteers.

    • Agree: IronForge
    • Disagree: Mike Tre
    • Thanks: SeekerofthePresence
  189. hillaire says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Ah.. ‘mumblebrain’…. I wish there was an evil jew button for irrational imbeciles.

  190. @annamaria

    It’s infuriating that our government basically let the Sacklers walk with a slap on the wrist…..for deliberately providing synthetic heroin to massive numbers of gentiles who died from Oxycontin.

    Apparently, the Sacklers are allowed to continue to market the poison that killed hundreds of thousands of our people, and will no doubt kill hundreds of thousands more.

    It’s amazing what you can get away with when you’re part of the nose tribe.

    It’s also astounding (when your pattern recognition kicks in) that in every aspect of our existence as white people…..there are systems now in place, set in place by organized jewry….to harm us in every way possible.

  191. Miro23 says:
    @Svevlad

    … better if he went to Africa and got himself an actual tribal princess. The benefits of a traditional woman AND the virtue signaling from the (full) blackness.

    Agree – this Meghan is by no stretch an African – just a pathetic SJW playing a Jewish media game.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  192. @anonymousperson

    You are Canadian?? Then you should know your government, like all governments, have been lying to you:

    https://www.themythiscanada.com/

  193. Miro23 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Apart from the fact that she’s not an idiot; She’s a clever opportunist run by organized Jewry:

    What kills me about this idiot Meghan is her total lack of self-awareness. If she’s so into blackness and equality, why did she pursue and marry a White Prince? Why not marry a coal-black truck driver? Go blacker and live among regular folks. But she wants to be at the top while pretending to care for the downtrodden(among the blacks of course, as we never heard her say anything in support of Palestinians or Syrians).

    But then, this hypocrisy defines the Western Elites who are mostly status-obsessed go-getters who send their kids to the toniest schools and hobnob with the fancy crowd but also make much noise about ‘social justice’ and ‘equity’.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  194. @anonymous

    I have 3 kids with my Guatemalan wife. Its a fact that obtaining a decent white woman is nearly impossible these days.

    • LOL: AndrewR
  195. anon[321] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Agree with much of what you said. However I feel like I do need to defend the royals somewhat. I think for the most part Prince William and Kate Middleton have lived an exemplary life. Every society has its rich and its aristocracy, most of them are pretty decadent and depraved, but William and Kate have been nothing but a class act. They and the Queen herself are examples of the finest of WASP traditions – good manners, good postures, well spoken, no partying/public drunkenness, clean cut, never complain, self-restraint, honest, do not commit adultery, good parents. William also served in the air force, can pilot a helicopter, and has a good sense of humor. They take their responsibility of serving the people and the nation seriously, and are well loved because of it.

    The Royal family also upholds Western tradition by continuing to exemplify marriage and family life for young people. I mean things could be worse, one of the kids could be gay and live a degenerate lifestyle as a flaming queen. It’s unfortunate that Harry married the wrong person, and this is what happens when worlds collide, they are just two people from very different worlds who never should’ve gotten together, there’s just too much to overcome, not just royalty vs. commoner, but also British vs. American, white vs. black. The more Harry and Meghan complain, the better they make William and Kate look.

    The British royals are the last bastion of Western tradition, the last institution that was quintessentially WASP until Meghan Markle came along. It’s why (((the media))) has been trying to tear them apart. They are now using Meghan Markle to further rip into this family. I think advocating for its abolition would play right into the hands of the Jews.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Hibernian
  196. @Emslander

    You are right. The wealthy whites are as guilty as the Jews in all this. Our fellow unz readers haven’t REALLY taken the red pill until they admit this fact.

  197. @Miro23

    Great comment. The woke reek of lies and hypocrisy. (much like the pro Israel, pro torture, pro war so called conservatives)

  198. Miro23 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Agreed. It’s selective victimhood:

    In our modern culture, claims of victimhood are the path to power. Today, we’re seeing the conflict between victim culture and honor culture.

    Not really. If it were so, does anyone really think American Indians gain lots of power by bitching about victimhood? How come Palestinians don’t have power in Europe or the US even though they made endless cases of their victimhood at the hands of Jews?

    It’s not the case that talk of victimhood leads to power. Rather, those with power use their control of victimhood narratives and iconography to shore up their own power and/or to favor their allies. So, no amount of Palestinian talk of victimhood will lead to power or guarantee sympathy from the West. No amount of American Indian historical gripes will lead to real power.

    • Agree: James Speaks
  199. Rocha says:
    @canspeccy

    What one thousand years? The Dutch Protestant William III usurped the throne from the rightful heir James II in 1686. James II was brought up a Catholic and would not have agreed to the establishment of the usurious central bank, the Bank of England which was the beginning of the slavery of the English to the debt based financial system. They had to get rid of the Czar Nicholas for the same reason. His grandfather, Alexander, had vowed that he would never permit the establishment of a central bank on Russian soil.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  200. Ryan2 says:

    Dude, like gag me with a spoon. I couldn’t finish the article.
    Child rapist Sir Jimmy Saville was running around Buckingham palace for decades, yet Meghan Markle or whoever is the problem?

    • Agree: Hibernian
  201. @Priss Factor

    Priss,

    Your essays are always interesting.

    I have to take issue with one thing however. I do not agree that jews are a superior race. The Ashkenazi score a bit higher than the average white, but the overall IQ for Israel is 100…..
    the same league as white America.

    In terms of high IQ people…..whites have many hundreds of thousands(maybe millions) more than jews….simply because of our much larger population.

    In fact, as I recall, in the early part of the 20th century jewish immigrants were thought to be quite dull and scored very low on IQ tests.

    At any rate, it isn’t intelligence that puts the jews on top…..it’s their cohesive group strategy….the fact that before making any move they stop to ask, “Is it good for the jews?”

    And the corollary is that organized jewry is perfectly willing to use violence to attain what is good for the jews….(while whites operating with a Christian value system abhor killing)

    I would not refer to the Bolsheviks as “intelligent.” The first term that comes to mind would be “murderous.”

    I don’t think that white people have ANY idea just how horrendous it is to be suffering under jewish tyranny.

    Solzhenitsyn spelled it out long ago.

  202. AceDeuce says:
    @Truth

    No, I don’t.

    So your second question is non-applicable.

    Try and shut me up, Smackboy.

    • Replies: @Truth
  203. AceDeuce says:
    @Anon

    Many modern American ( and European) women hold themselves as “a people apart” from men. Don’t whine when men then regard them that way.

  204. Skeptikal says:
    @AndrewR

    I don’t think Harry looks anything like Philip.
    Except for the lighter hair.
    But Philip is blond and where did Harry get the curly red hair?

    • Replies: @TGD
  205. Skeptikal says:
    @Verymuchalive

    “The alternative is not some obscure illegitimate Continental. ”

    This may or may not be true, but the English were always importing Continentals to take over.
    The Hanoverians.
    The House of Orange,
    Victoria was mostly German.
    Then the Saxe-Coburgs . . .

    Not to mention the good old Normans (originally Norse, via Normandy)

  206. Skeptikal says:
    @Irish Savant

    Is Suits soft porn?
    I don’t have a TV so I don’t know.

  207. The Age of Victimperialism.

    Christians pioneered it. Because they had been victims of the pagan Romans and Jews-gone-bad, their imperialism was sold as spreading love than grabbing power.

    US imperialism was effective for the same cover. You see, US cannot be imperialist since it came into existence as fight for freedom against British imperialism.

    And now, Jews and blacks spread their global influence but it’s never imperialism because they are victims spreading the message of justice.

    Btw, people need to understand the difference between pity for a poor bunny baby and for a poor tiger cub. Even when the bunny baby grows up, it will only be a rabbit. But when the cute tiger cub grows up, it will be a big beast.

    Jews and blacks are dangerous. They might seem pitiable but Jewish brain power and black brawn power can grow big and destroy your people.

  208. Robjil says:
    @anon

    The British royals are the last bastion of Western tradition, the last institution that was quintessentially WASP until Meghan Markle came along. It’s why (((the media))) has been trying to tear them apart. They are now using Meghan Markle to further rip into this family. I think advocating for its abolition would play right into the hands of the Jews.

    Well, this British royal bashing and Catholic bashing in prior themes from our Zion “free” press proves beyond doubt that our rulers are not the British royalty or the Vatican.

    Who is supreme in our “free ” Zion press? Israel, Israel firsters and Jewish culture. The Top Jews chipping away at all things not Jewish will soon make it clear to everyone that they rule us all. Thus, they can not keep their overbearing power over all of us a secret anymore.

    As Gilad Atzmon said

    Jewish power is the power to silence the truth about Jewish power.

  209. Hibernian says:
    @anon

    The British royals are the last bastion of Western tradition…

    People who don’t have a real job? Yea, right.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  210. Thomasina says:
    @Truth

    I said: “But it is important to observe who is being painted as the latest “victim” in society, and whether the painting is a comedy or a serious work of art.”

    You said: “Is it? Why?”

    Because each victim adds another piece of the puzzle and allows us to see the bigger picture. Kind of like how they pushed the Jussie Smollett story until it too collapsed into a noose that wasn’t. I could go on, but you probably get the picture.

    “No, the reason the country is in the state it it’s in, is because you have been observing, instead of ignoring, which is what I do, and what I implore others to do, and what I do on this site.”

    Going through the world wearing blinders and asleep at the wheel, ignoring the tide coming in around you, and then drowning is great advice! Thanks, but no thanks. But you go ahead if you want to.

    We are being fed a narrative and we’re being asked to swallow it without question. Thank goodness people are paying attention now.

    Have a good day, Sport.

  211. @Priss Factor

    Nah. The danger from jews isn’t their “brainpower.”

    jews are dangerous because they are deceitful and malicious and they utilize ingroup preference.

    Whites would be the same kind of sharks if they were as unmoored from morality as the jews.

    jews have a particularist morality. Good is what is good for the jews (and fuck everybody else)
    So….they actually have no morality at all and operate in a moral vacuum.

    Whites follow a Christian value system that is universal.

    Nazism was the mirror image of judaism, as it implemented ingroup preference for whites.

    We are now in the same spot as the Germans during Weimar, when the jews had usurped power and were dealing pain to the German populace.

    Hitler said fuck that…..we shall have ingroup preference for OUR people.

    As to the buckwheats…..they have no agency except what the jews give them. Megan Markle is simply a mouthpiece for organized jewry. The idea that this white presenting bitch represents black people is absurd.

    • Troll: Corvinus
  212. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Rocha

    The Dutch Protestant William III usurped the throne from the rightful heir James II in 1686.

    “Usurped does not seem quite the right word. James II ran away, chucking to orb and sceptre in the Thames on his way to France. But in any case, whether by legal succession or usurpation the monarch has been the head of government in England since 1066 and, in fact, before then, with the only significant break being the Cromwellian Protectorate.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  213. Mike Tre says:
    @CCG

    I wondered out loud in Sailer’s comments if an Epstein like network has dirt on Harry, and the Markle marriage is part of the terms of blackmail.

  214. Mike Tre says:
    @Anon

    Just so you are aware, ol’ Troof here thinks 99% of celebrity women are transsexuals. He also believes that the lunar landings were faked and that the moon is a large piece of celestial cheese.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Truth
  215. @orionyx

    Superb.

    Well done that man.

  216. Mike Tre says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    If you are offended, perhaps you should return to reading Teen Vogue and let the adults here speak about the uncomfortable truths that slack jawed NPC’s like you dishonestly refer to as “hate.”

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
  217. The behavior of the non whites the last few years has been the gift that cannot stop giving for white people who want our nation back. I live in southern California and talk to people for a living. I sell high ticket items so most of my customers are still white people. They are all sick of non whites and would vote to send them all away if they could. They bring it up in conversations about leaving California.

    I think there is a chance that the jew mob realizes that mestizo’s will not be willing to let them rule over them after all. They are now goading the non whites into a confrontation they cannot win in the end. If a majority of white Americans decide to make America white again very little could be done to stop it.

    According to the GOA US citizens who drop out of high school end up costing the taxpayers around a million dollars over their lifetimes. Half of the Mestizo citizens drop out of high school. The jew mob is not going to like it if there is so much less to steal.

    The small percentage of non whites who can keep up are simply not worth the damage their cousins are doing. The conversation needs to begin with white people demanding that non whites show us what they bring to the table and if its just an appetite its time for them to go back where they belong.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Truth
  218. Hibernian says:
    @CanSpeccy

    King Billy was another Cromwell only with a Crown and dressed in royal garb.

  219. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeeBee

    If so, jews themselves deny it, saying they were miners and laborers who married in Church:
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/middleton-shmiddleton-britains-new-royal-heir-is-not-a-jew/

    Mind you, Carole Middleton’s physique could be jewish.
    But the daughter looks thoroughbred.

    • Replies: @mike smith
  220. Malla says:
    @Priss Factor

    As blacks have been (selectively) associated with slavery, Jim Crow, and Civil Rights Movement — never mind that all of black ‘history’ was about savagery, slavery, and brutality in the Dark Continent — , having them as allies means that Jews have the blessing of Noble Negroes. This gives Jews a free hand to oppress Palestinians. I mean, how can Jews be bad when their allies are the Noble Negroes?

    Even though Jews have installed Black Worship as a dominant feature of Western life and even the Whole World up to some extent, black people are themselves in the plantation. Jewish pushed post WW2 culture including feminism, hatred for traditional Western civilization etc… has destroyed the Black family, destroyed black behaviour to their own detriment. Before the Civil Rights Movement, blacks owned many successful businesses and the black family was comparatively much better shape. Jews are only using blacks while a large chunk of the Black population remains fucked up. Instead, if the Jews really cared for blacks, they would have encouraged them to be more disciplined, more future oriented, taught them Jewish entrepreneurship. Nothing of that sort was done. Instead they have pushed Blacks to become even more dysfunctional with baby mamas and criminal thugs because it benefits them.

    When Britain ruled over India, the Hindus and Muslims there were told that the British monarch was their rightful and kindly ruler as well.

    This is correct.
    When the Queen Empress of India, Queen Victoria died, many Bengalis of firebrand revolutionary Bengal responded as if it was the death of a mother. Mother worship (Goddess Durga, Goddess Kali, Goddess Saraswati –Goddess of knowledge) is very strong in Bengal. King Emperor George V became the first ruling monarch to visit India in 1911. Many Indian freedom fighting political leaders while challenging and criticizing British Raj Government of India, solemnly mourned the death of the King Emperor of India, George V in 1936.

    Queen Victoria was also the God Mother of an Indian Princess. Victoria Gouramma was the daughter of Chikka Virarajendra, the King of Coorg in Southern India, who was defeated by the British EIC under the command of James Stuart Fraser. King/Raja Virarajendra surrendered on 24 April 1834 and was taken political prisoner to Benares. He went to England in March 1852 and Queen Victoria received the king with royal treatment and he let his daughter, the Royal Princess to the care of the British Queen. Gowramma was also under the care of Major Drummond and his wife who had travelled by ship along with the Raja/King. Gowramma was baptized on 5 July 1852 in a ceremony conducted at the Buckingham Palace by the Archbishop of Canterbury with the Queen as godmother giving her the name of Victoria.Princess Victoria Gowramma of Coorg Royal Family of Southern India, Queen Victoria was her God Mother.
    In 1858 Queen Victoria asked Lena, Lady Login to find a suitor for her god daughter. There was an expectation that she would be a suitable wife for Duleep Singh, the (now deposed) King of the Sikh Empire, but he announced that he intended to marry an English woman. Lady Login, on failure on finding a suitable Indian royal house for the princess later tried to find a suitable European noble to become Princess Gowramma’s husband, but Princess Gowramma fell in love and married Lt. Col. John Campbell. They had a daughter Edith Victoria Gouramma Campbell born on 2 July 1861. Princess Gouramma died in 1864 and was buried at Brompton cemetery. A marble bust was made of her by Baron Marochetti and is now at the Osborn House in the Isle of Wight. Edith Victoria, her daughter, married Henry Yardley, son of Sir W. Yardley, and had a son Victor.
    A tribe in Orrisa region of South Eastern India even worshiped Queen Victoria their Divine Goddess.
    https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/33762568

  221. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike Tre

    😂 thanks, perhaps God in his wisdom gave us only a few truths apiece. After that.. there’s always Unz.

  222. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    King Billy was another Cromwell only with a Crown and dressed in royal garb.

    Far from it. The accession of William of Orange to the throne of England marked the ascendancy of Parliament, and the end of absolute monarchy based on the Stuart notion of divine right.

    • Replies: @Rocha
    , @Hibernian
  223. @James Scott

    You don’t get how it works.

    The jews opened the borders to fuck white people and they do not CARE if they ruin the country in the process.

    It doesn’t matter what whites think/want/do.

    jews run the show.

    The non-whites are brought in to specifically outbreed and outvote white people because jews see white people as an historical enemy.

    The “damage” of massive third world immigration is a PLUS as far as organized jewry is concerned.

    • Agree: anonymousperson
    • Replies: @James Scott
  224. @Hibernian

    Their real job is exactly not having a real job, i.e. having a symbolic function only.

  225. Malla says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Chinese tradition of the SPITTOON,

    The cunning Chinese are selling these Spitoons as well as portable toilets as “Traditional Chinese Fruit Bowls/ Decoration bowls” to dumb Westerners including Black Westerners on Amazon and Alibaba. Mostly to libtard baffoons. The Western leftard snob— The joke of the World. LOL


    Not only are they not Fruit Bowls, these Spitoons/ toilets are highly overpriced.
    Many Western libtard/ leftard snobs are keeping fruits/ wine in these portable toilets/shitpots and later consuming them.

    • Replies: @Marckus
  226. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    the moon is a large piece of celestial cheese.

    Well, technically the theory is that it is some sort of plasma.

  227. Truth says:
    @James Scott

    I think there is a chance that the jew mob realizes that mestizo’s will not be willing to let them rule over them after all.

    Why not? The Honkees there now do.

    • Replies: @James Scott
  228. @Irish Savant

    “…I would not have called Markle an “actor.” She is an “actress.”

    No, she is a “soft-porn actress”…”

    You would doubt that “soft” part of the acting of the …ahem…”duchess of Sussex” if you go to xhamster and search for “Meghan Markle”.

  229. @annamaria

    “…Some of the Chinese contributions to world civilization: Papermaking, gun powder, printing, compass, Seismograph, blast furnace…”

    Yes, I know that (though printing was invented independently in Europe and the Vikings had developed a simple compass of their own), but one wonders why those intelligent Chinese for thousands of years used a cumbersome ideogrammatic script (50,000 characters to learn!) and did not develop an alphabetic system of their own, but only recently under western influence (pinyin in 1958).

    The criminal behavior of the Jewish Sassoon family is as little “emblematic of the West” as is that of the Sackler family for America.

    After all, as an inveterate sinosceptic, I cannot resist the temptation to publish one more picture of those oh so “progresssive” Chinese of Chinese school children, still calculating with the abacus:

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Marckus
  230. Rocha says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Obviously influenced by the spin.
    The ascension of William III marked the beginning of the enslavement of the English and eventually the world to the debt based financial system with the establishment of the Bank of England which the Catholic king James would not have permitted. On the same day they established the bank, they instituted limited democracy so that the citizens could not renege the debts contracted in their name by the government with private bankers who conjured money out of thin air under the fractional reserve system. Citizens became mere collateral for debt.
    On the same day they established income tax so that the government would always have the money to pay back the debts with interest. We vote for our own slavery and that of our children and grandchildren to the debt based financial system which is about to implode.
    Every single war and revolution since then has been to impose this nefarious system on the rest of the world.
    For Catholics and Muslims usury is a sin and tibia no coincidence that after 9/11 the only two countries left in the Middle East without a Rothschilds controlled central bank are Syria and Iran.
    An alternative history of the foreign invasion of England without the spin. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15055430.video-why-the-william-of-orange-story-is-described-as-one-of-the-biggest-lies-of-british-history/

    • Replies: @canspeccy
  231. Vojkan says:

    When something repeatedly avers to be dysfunctional in practice, questioning the design may be in order instead of carping about rotten apples, as perhaps they aren’t just glitches but rather built-in features.
    As a monarchist myself, following a line of reasoning similar to that of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, I have to admit that if the Windsors were tossed down the garbage heap of history, I wouldn’t cry over their fate, as they are a truly uniquely disagreeable bunch and are part and parcel of the lunatic globalist elite that has brought the world where it is.
    They say karma’s a bitch and Meghan Markle seems to quite fit the definition.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @Anon
  232. Sean says:
    @Franz

    Yes those sort of ideas were to the fore in the early seventies among the armed forces ECT ECT. But it was really dissatisfaction with the Labour party’s electoral success. It seemed the (Labour-Party-affiliated) unions were able to provoke the Conservative governments into calling elections on the issue of who governs the country; elections which kicked out Conservative governments.

    Behind the talk of coups was a clique in the secret security service MI5 plus their friends in Scotland Yard’s Special Branch; they ludicrously affected to believe that Harold Wilson was a KGB agent. The brilliant Wilson unexpectedly resigned in the middle of his tern, probably because he had began to lose his zest along with mental sharpness. The intellectually pedestrian James Callahan became the Labour leader and Prime Minister, with the job of implementing austerity, which Labour did successfully with Wage Restraint agreements with the unions, but they warned him that could not last. Callahan then made the fatal error of not calling an General Election before the lid blew off. A series of strikes (‘Winter Of Discontent’) was reported on gleefully by the Murdoch press and Labour were out of power for 19 years.

    Anyway, the loyalty to the Crown was never referring to the actual flesh and blood royal family, it was more a way of saying the the Deep State could do anything that it thought was necessary off its own bat, but with a sort of constitutional rationale for it.

    • Thanks: Franz
  233. Malla says:
    @Priss Factor

    After a grueling war with French Canada(which the colonials insisted upon), the British slightly raised taxes on the colonials, which was justified given the costs of war.

    Correct.

    From The Expansion of Europe : The Culmination of Modern History by Ramsay Muir

    “The American Revolution is, then, an event unique at once in its causes, its character, and its consequences; and it throws a most important illumination upon some of the problems of imperialism. It cannot be pretended that the revolt of the colonists was due to oppression or to serious misgovernment. The paltry taxes which were its immediate provoking cause would have formed a quite negligible burden upon a very prosperous population; they were to have been spent exclusively within the colonies themselves, and would have been mainly used to meet a part of the cost of colonial defence, the bulk of which was still to be borne by the mother-country. If the colonists had been willing to suggest any other means of raising the required funds, their suggestions would have been readily accepted. This was made plain at several stages in the course of the discussion, but the invitation to suggest alternative methods of raising money met with no response. The plain fact is that Britain, already heavily loaded with debt, was bearing practically the whole burden of colonial defence, and was much less able than the colonies themselves to endure the strain. As for the long-established restrictions on colonial trade, which in fact though not in form contributed as largely as the proposals of direct taxation to cause the revolt, they were far less severe, even if they had been strictly enforced, than the restrictions imposed upon the trade of other European settlements.”

    …snip….

    “The root of the matter was that the old colonial system, which had suited well enough the needs of the colonies as they were when it was devised by the statesmen of Charles II.’s reign, was no longer suitable to their condition now that they had become great and prosperous communities of freemen. They enjoyed self-government on a scale more generous than any other communities in the world outside of Britain; indeed, in one sense they enjoyed it on a more generous scale than Britain herself, since political rights were much more widely exercised in the colonies, owing to the natural conditions of a new and prosperous land, than they were to be, or could be, in Britain until nearly a century later. No direct taxation had as yet been imposed upon them without their own consent. They made the laws by which their own lives were regulated. They were called upon to pay no tribute to the home government, except the very indirect levy on goods passing through England to or from their ports, and this was nearly balanced by the advantages which they enjoyed in the British market, and far more than balanced by the protection afforded to them by the British fleet. They were not even required to raise troops for the defence of their own frontiers except of their own free will, and the main burden of defending even their landward frontier was borne by the mother-country. But being British they had the instinct of self-government in their blood and bones…….”

    • Thanks: Thomasina
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  234. hopefully says:
    @anonymous

    from the perspective of a “hierarchical honor system” — as this interesting article terms it — there is a stark difference between promiscuosity and disloyalty. the first will be covered up if a loyal member is being criticized for it, the second is a critical danger for the system that needs to be driven out or eliminated. thus in the first case external criticism will be walled out in the second case the fallen insider will be driven out from the castle walls.

  235. Marckus says:
    @Malla

    FOR SALE

    Crapper Marckus III Toilet and Tank, gently used. New cover. Auto Wash system with chain pull attached. Pre-Covid collectible made in 1920.

    Holds 10 large loaves or can be used for fruit and vegetables storage.

    Want to have someone special over ? The extra large capacity means more ice and colder wine or a favourite bottle of Dom Perignon. The shape and design of the bowl means the taste and texture of your food is greatly enhanced.

    Unique Camouflage pattern but will custom paint as required. Shipping and Handling is extra. 50% discount and free shipping for Chinese buyers.

    • LOL: Malla
  236. annamaria says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    It is quite possible that “a cumbersome ideogrammatic script (50,000 characters to learn!) ” explains why Chinese kids are so intelligent – they train their memory and attention from an early age.

    Some ambitious and intelligent European/American families teach their kids Chinese by hiring native speakers. Guess this reflects on the understanding of where the economy and sciences will flourish.

    And it was nice of you to accept that the Chinese made some important discoveries independently of (and often earlier than) Europeans.

    Brits had provided an army to protect Sasson’s monopoly on the opium trade in India. There were massive casualties on the side of Indians and a good number of casualties among the British; that was emblematic of the GB. The AIPAC/Lobby power in the US Congress is emblematic of the US.

  237. Marckus says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Beyond a certain point one cannot help but find these people amusing. There is not much you can do but laugh. When was the last time you saw a Chinaman with a shaved head, pigtails and wearing baggy pants and a dress ?

    They smuggle themselves into the US or engage in fraud to get visas, want to study here, want their litter to be born here for the citizenship, wear western clothes. dye their hair blond, drive Euro cars and even get blue contact lenses. Some even want to talk like a Maddafacka Nigga !

    All this, along with their 50,000 character alphabet and abacus, crooked teeth and coke bottle glasses has finally convinced me they are superior to whites. Thousands of years of civilization and their most outstanding contribution to mankind is the fortune cookie, made with cheap filler and a stupid proverb written in English.

    Thank God we have such superior being among us, showing us the way to a better, shining future and another 4000 years of outstanding progress !

  238. annamaria says:

    Mr. Harry Markle’s biggy problem is his treasonous behavior towards his country of the UK and towards his family that happens to be the British Royal family.
    As for the profligate and promiscuous Meghan Markle, she is the epitome of American woke. Mrs. Markle is unintelligent, spoiled, pretentious, and utterly hypocritical.
    Together these two, the dimwit disloyal British “prince” and the vulgar American “dutchess” (with pretenses on saintliness) make a veritable picture of the useless woke generation.
    As for Oprah, she has been “markled,” which means that the doors to decent peoples’ houses will be tightly closed for her, and deservedly so. She is an arsonist.

    • Agree: Avery
    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Avery
  239. annamaria says:
    @annamaria

    Sorry for the typos:
    Brits had provided an army to protect Sasson’s monopoly on the opium trade in China. There were massive casualties on the side of the Chinese and a good number of casualties among the British.

  240. Marckus says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    I wish there was a Slopes Disposal button where we could flush away people like Mulgo Mumbo Jumbo and all his other sleazy pervert Bros slithering around on this site.

    There ought to be some kind of detector on this site that zaps these pesky insects anytime they try to sign onto UR.

  241. Anon[280] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vojkan

    The British Royals brought down by Jews, who would have thought?

    Here’s jewish Charlie’s incisive take on Ms Markle:
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/charlie-hebdo-fury-over-cover-23706827

    • LOL: Vojkan
  242. @annamaria

    “…It is quite possible that “a cumbersome ideogrammatic script (50,000 characters to learn!) ” explains why Chinese kids are so intelligent – they train their memory and attention from an early age…”

    Well, Jewish children learn to read Hebrew from the age of three, and it is said that that makes them so intelligent, but Hebrew has only 22 letters…

    The thing is training the memory and rote learning does not really increase intelligence.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  243. bayviking says:

    The US was on the right track when it disallowed royalty. But the increasing concentration of wealth is the same poison by a different name. Jeff Bezo and Mark Zuckerberg have more money and because of the power of money, more rights than other citizens. Amazon now has more lobbyists in DC than there are elected representatives. Yet we continue to call ourselves a democracy. GMFB.

  244. Corvinus says:

    “However, having ignored Enoch Powell and imported the American race problem, the British are learning that integration doesn’t strengthen an institution. It hollows it out and may even destroy it.”

    Our intrepid author forgets that Great Britain was an amalgamation of Jutes, Britons, Frisians, Normans, Angles, Saxons, and Romans, a cadre of different groups, some peaceful, some warlike.

    And, Great Britain actually **exported** the race problem. The more you know…

    • Disagree: anonymousperson
  245. Iris says:

    These are the people who, in Britain, submitted Mrs Markle to a continued media barrage of insults and humiliations.

    They are paid-for mouthpieces of the Israel lobby, employees of Israel’s Sayan Rupert Murdoch, who took part in the shameless News of the World hacking affair.

    The News of the World hacking was orchestrated as a spying operation, that hacked into the voicemail of a murdered little girl, the confidential medical records of PM G. Brown’s children, as well as politicians’ secrets. It was the media version of the Jeffrey Epstein operation.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Weeting

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @annamaria
  246. Malla says:
    @Miro23

    better if he went to Africa and got himself an actual tribal princess. The benefits of a traditional woman AND the virtue signaling from the (full) blackness.

    He could walk in the footstep of Jimmy Moxon OBE who was a White chief of the Akan kingdom of Ghana.
    Married to at least six different local women, the white Englishman spent half the year as a retired civil servant in his thatched cottage near Ludlow and the other half as a “fully gazetted” Akan chieftain in the hills of Aburi in southern Ghana. Chief Moxon or his Akan name, Chief Nana Kofi Obonyaa, died in 1999 and a shrine has been placed in the shadow of the silk cotton tree that gave him his tribal name. He had won the country’s adoration as a British civil servant during the Second World War when he personally visited farmers, encouraging them to switch from cocoa to food crops, a decision that saved countless lives. Beneath a bronze head, a simple plaque reads “a loyal son of the empire and a true son of Ghana”.

  247. Malla says:
    @Miro23

    Or Dutchman Henk Otte who is King Togbe Korsi Ferdinand Gakpetor II of Ghana.
    In West Africa, he rules part of the Volta Region, home to tens of thousands of Ewes who revere him as their king.

    Like his parents, Otte was born and raised in Amsterdam where he lives with his wife and two children, and an ordinary life would have suited him just fine. But, while visiting the hometown of his Ghanaian-born wife Patty in 1995, he was identified as the reincarnation of the late chief, his wife’s grandfather.

    Now, when he goes to Ghana, Otte is carried by throne-bearers and surrounded by cheering crowds. Drummers pound and dancers swirl. He wears a crown and monarch’s garments and lives in a home built for him.

    The region he rules, about 70km east of the capital Accra, comprises about 40 villages populated by more than 100 000 people. It was leaderless for almost 17 years until the Dutchman was proclaimed king.

    Otte is aware that life as a king isn’t all fun and games. In Mepe, he is prohibited from eating or drinking in public, he can’t shake hands with the thousands of “commoners” who flock to his side and is always escorted, even to the toilet.

    His attraction to Ghana began as a child, while reading about its geography and history. Later, he says, a Ghanaian fortune teller predicted he would obtain a position of power.

    On a visit to his wife’s village of Mepe, people said his “aura” reminded them of the late king. One day, Mepe’s leaders told him he was the chosen one. “They asked me how I’d feel about becoming king,” he said. “I looked at them and thought: ‘You’ve got to be completely insane’.”

    Otte now agrees with his subjects that his appointment was predetermined by a higher being. “If you think about it, it’s pretty weird,” he said. “But it’s my destiny.”

  248. @Robert Dolan

    Explain why all the sudden the madness from non whites is suddenly being amplified? The jew mob covered up anti whites hostility towards white people for decades and suddenly they are promoting it.

    Notice I gave reasons for what might be happening and you simply told me what you believe. Things are rarely as simple as you think.

  249. @Truth

    White people have been heavily propagandized for decades to get us too this point.
    The USA has been the land of milk and honey up to now. Anyone who thinks fat and happy people will rebel is retarded.

    The mestizo’s are going to cause scarcity and then you will find out messing with us honkies was a bad idea. White people have not began fighting back yet. When you do you will tremble in fear and run back to where you belong. You are nothing and not equal to white people in any way.

    • Replies: @Truth
  250. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Franz

    “My oath as an officer is to the Queen, not to those (XXX) in their bunker. The Queen can abolish Parliament and order up another that will do the job right. She should.”

    What was bugging him that day I don’t know. But I checked (1971, admittedly) and he was right.
    1971.

    Nineteen seventy-one was a couple of years after I had left the UK in disgust with failure of the Callaghan government to prevent labor unions from disrupting the economy and the lives of ordinary people — I recall, in particular, an old woman, in tears, walking away from the Devon and Exeter Hospital who told me she had come by bus from far out of town for a hospital appointment only to be turned away because the nursing union was on strike.

    And your naval acquaintance was technically correct. The Queen not only has the authority to dissolve parliament, but as head of the armed forces can, presumably, order the government be taken out and shot.

    The problem for English nationalists is that the Queen, who is devoted to the British Commonwealth of 54 nations, is dedicated globalist, as is her heir, Charles. So to them, the breach of the English Constitution engaged in by all governments since that of the Second Churchill administration, namely of admitting ever increasing numbers of immigrants to Britain, is a good thing.

    So, on the biggest issue in British politics today, Her Majesty the Queen and her successor are members of the Treason Party, incapable therefore, of performing their duty to defend the constitution. And here I speak of the constitution in the sense understood by Prime Minister Lord Salisbury who maintained that the only breach of the constitutions was for the government to do something to which the majority of the people were strongly opposed, and mass immigration is, and has been for for decades, strongly opposed by a large majority of the British population.

    • Replies: @Franz
  251. Fr. John says:
    @BuelahMan

    “Maybe its just that I’m a Mississippi redneck…”

    No, Buelah- you’re merely ignorant of Christianity’s interaction with Western Civ, the Church (not necessarily the Church of Rome, but at least her historical position) the concept of what a White Man is, and the Adamic Nature of all the Elect.

    If you don’t care for the last symbol of Christian civilization in the Anglosphere, you’d probably be the sort of mental retard who’d vote for Biden….. did Jew?

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @BuelahMan
  252. @Corvinus

    “…Our intrepid author forgets that Great Britain was an amalgamation of Jutes, Britons, Frisians, Normans, Angles, Saxons, and Romans, a cadre of different groups, some peaceful, some warlike…”

    Yes, that was an “amalgamation” of White + White + White + White + White + White + White. Some “race problem”!

    • LOL: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  253. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    If anthropogenic climate destabilisation is not forestalled, then Charles’ ‘race’ will go extinct. The human race, that is.

    You could be right, although as the climate system is chaotic, who knows? Certainly not Prince Charles or Greta Thunberg. What should perhaps be of greater concern is the effect of carbon dioxide on the functioning of the human brain, when the human brain is functioning, that is.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  254. Truth says:
    @James Scott

    Maybe, but you aren’t equal to Khazars, so I guess it’s all relative?

  255. Truth says:
    @Fr. John

    If you don’t care for the last symbol of Christian civilization in the Anglosphere,

    An inbred family of welfare freeloaders?

    That’s pretty sad, yet strangely appropriate…

  256. @Priss Factor

    The danger from organized jewry is not their alleged “brainpower.”

    The nose is dangerous because the nose will use any means necessary to win.

    Organized jewry utilizes a “particularist” morality…..a system that always chooses “what is good for the jews.” Before the small hats make any move they ask, “Is it good for the jews?”
    (Note that what is good for the jews is NEVER good for white people….it’s an inverse correlation)

    At the same time, white people operate under a Christian value system that is universal. So whites often make choices that are good for everyone…..and jews have deracinated whites so that whites do not employ ingroup preference.

    When I think of Bolsheviks….intelligent is not what comes to mind….murderous is what comes to mind.

    The nose is willing to use violence to attain its’ ends. Note the violence from BLM and Antifa as they are foot soldiers for organized jewry. Note that communists mass murdered over 100 million people in the 20th century.

    Solzhenitsyn warned us long ago.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  257. annamaria says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    First, you have omitted the word “attention.” Check what attentional control can do for the brain.
    Second, what is the point of boasting about Jewish children learning a useless and artificially-revived language?
    Finally, the still-living tradition of learning great poetry by heart is magnificent.

    • Replies: @SeekerofthePresence
  258. canspeccy says: • Website
    @Rocha

    The ascension of William III marked the beginning of the enslavement of the English and eventually the world to the debt based financial system with the establishment of the Bank of England which the Catholic king James would not have permitted.

    That is rather far removed from the issue of the durability of monarchy as an institution.

    But you are correct that the revolution of 1688 largely restored the power that Parliament had achieved under Cromwell, and marked the beginning of a long-continued decline in the powers of the monarch.

    Parliament in the days of William III was dominated by small landowners, or country gentlemen as Macaulay called them, who, at that time, made up the majority of the entrepreneural class. These people needed loan capital to develop newly enclosed common land, and later for the construction of canals, railways and overseas projects.

    The money lenders were also essential to the projection of British power. It was the superior ability of the British Government to raise loans that enabled William III to defeat the France of Louis 14, a country far wealthier and more populous than England.

    With France beat, the Brits were free to conquer the world — a quarter of it, anyway, hence the British Commonwealth of 54 nations to which Queen Elizabeth II and Charles III (if he makes it) are probably more deeply committed than they are to the interests of the people of the United Kingdom.

  259. Malla says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    There is a difference between intra-cultural and extra-cultural imitation.

    Luxor Las Vegas???

  260. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    Mrs. Markle’s treatment of her elderly father has been atrocious. “How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have a thankless child.”
    (Owners of “People” magazine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meredith_Corporation)
    Her predatory hunting on the dimwit prince is well-documented. Meghan has been lying that she had no idea about who Harry was before she met him.
    She was a chorus girl with zero talent for acting. Nothing changed; she was and is an embodiment of vulgarity.
    Mrs. Markle used to present herself as a white woman, and she dated white wealthy men exclusively. And then it became more advantageous for her to become a woman of color. How many of her black relatives were presented during the lavish wedding ceremony? – One (1). But the useful Oprah and Cloonies were there.
    Mr. & Mrs. Markle told the whole world that they wanted privacy — and then they went to Hollywood! the capital of pups, and settled in the whitest and wealthiest neighborhood, of course.
    These two spoiled, poorly educated, obnoxious, and abusive wokes can not help themselves but lecturing the world about “white privilege” and “kindness.” Yet, they both cling like crazy to their titles and their privileges.
    https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2018/11/27/why-are-aides-leaving-kp-and-harry-and-mm/

    • Thanks: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Iris
  261. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Margaret,_Countess_of_Snowdon

    Shoulda same standard to Harry Fool and the snake-on-the-make.

  262. Truth says:
    @annamaria

    Mrs. Markle used to present herself as a white woman, and she dated white wealthy men exclusively.

    Great. Now she presents herself as a black woman and she marries white extremely wealthy men exclusively.

  263. Corvinus says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    “Yes, that was an “amalgamation” of White + White + White + White + White + White + White. Some “race problem””

    Those aforementioned groups did not consider themselves “white”. Rather, that is a more “recent” distinction. More importantly is that these groups had distinct ethnic and cultural differences, ones that were deemed to be inferior in nature by those groups. This mixture was considered as an initial affront, but as these groups assimilated, those ethnic and cultural differences melded into one.

    Praytell, are you Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? I make reference to Madison Grant (1917), who claimed the Nordics were out-bred by immigrant and “inferior” lower-class White racial stocks. More importantly, those groups were patently unqualified for the “Nordic political structure of the U.S.” Grant’s perception of non-Nordics is that they are utterly incapable of this “natural cohesion” despite all three groups having “genetic similarity”.

    So, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean?

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  264. Iris says:
    @annamaria

    Dear Annamaria, the problem is not Mrs Markle’s personality, ethics or absence thereof.

    The problem is, yet again, Whites’ “advocates” charging like stupid emasculated cattle against the red rag waved by the Zionist press, especially when a Black person is standing behind.

    The Zionist press in the UK is forcing upon the British people a narrative that has in reality nothing to do, neither with defending Whites, nor with defending the feckless Royal Family.

    Unbeknownst to apparently everybody, apart from commenter GeeBee, the key actor of this ridiculous saga, Mrs Middleton the future Queen Consort, is of Jewish descent.
    She is a carefully selected Tribal asset whose descendance will ensure that Israel keeps control over the throne of the United Kingdom.

    This lady is therefore covertly and unanimously promoted by the Murdoch press and other Zio-controlled MSM, who gaslights the readers and stir them against her “rival” sister-in-law, whom she had bullied and had runnings with .

    The whole story is a grotesque soap-opera between equally useless attention-seekers.
    However, it shows how self-proclaimed “Whites’ advocates” are blinded by the “race” card and forever easily fooled by their Talmudic masters.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  265. Avery says:
    @annamaria

    {“Mr. Harry Markle’s”}

    Awesome.
    Compactly and fully describing the dimwit half of the repugnant pair.

    • Replies: @Iris
  266. Mefobills says:

    Would somebody who knows more about the crown please explain the below to me?

    Queen Elizabeth II does her duty. She carries herself with quiet dignity. It’s her job. She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy.

    My understanding is that the Queen has power as final arbiter over Parliament, and could have stopped the demographic transformation. To my eye she could have challenged the (((City’s))) finance capitalism and its puppets in parliament.

    Why couldn’t she do her job and stop or reverse the demographic transformation? Was/is she actually just a weakling?

    • Replies: @Iris
  267. @Corvinus

    All of the groups mentioned were of the same race.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  268. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    The national socialists did observe differences between white ethnics. I’m detecting snark in your comment. Maybe I’m off-base and it is honest inquiry, if so I apologize in advance.
    ____________

    My take is that the more “ice age” adapted people have longer range planning, as they evolved in climates that required planning, or they would die. They also evolved to subordinate today for tomorrow.

    Grant was just one in a long line of thinkers who thought about European racial differences. Today, the “diversity crowd” does not recognize diversity in “white people.”

    From Tedore, Hitler’s Revolution, on racial hygiene:

    _____________

    What constitutes “racially foreign elements” was a matter of controversy within the NSDAP. Various ethnic groups comprise European civilization: Nordic, Gallic, Basque, Slavic, Baltic, Mediterranean and soforth. Pioneer racial hygienists maintained that intermarriage among diverse white clans produces a superior being. In 1924, the analyst Hildebrandt published an essay explaining, “The highest standard of living evolved where the Nordic race represented the leadership, but intermixed with others who adopted its culture.” Hans Günther wrote, “The French anatomist and race researcher de Quatresages observed in 1857 that the greatest mental and physical activity rests not among those of pure race, but among racially cross-bred populations.”

    Günther argued that just as competition can motivate people, the merger of different bloodlines creates a conflict within the psyche of the individual or population itself, animating a hitherto latent zest for struggle: “Stress, confrontation, and the urge to prevail produce the greatest achievements of mind and spirit. There is more potential for tension and altercation in the racially intermixed person than is the case for a pure-blooded one….The pure-blooded man harbors too little restlessness. Germans, Englishmen, or non-Scandinavians in general are struck by the ‘all too placid demeanor’ of many purely Nordic Scandinavians.”

    Under Gross, the Racial Policy Office walked a thin line between the more relaxed criteria envisioned by Günther and many of his contemporaries, and the “blond rapture” they cautioned against. In 1934, Gross’ colleague, Wolfgang Abel, published generalizations of Germany’s ethnic tribes: the Nordic, Pfalzish, Eastern Baltic, Dinaric, Alpine, Western Nordic, and Western Mediterranean. He described physical characteristics, illustrated with camera portraits resembling mug shots, and collective personality traits of each. Abel offered for example, this profile of the Nordic type:

    “The least spontaneous, he surpasses all other races in steadfastness of purpose and cautious foresight. Thinking ahead, he subordinates his driving impulses to long-range goals. Self-composure is perhaps the most distinguishable trait of the Nordic race. In this lies a significant part of the ability to create civilizations.

  269. AceDeuce says:
    @Truth

    No, LARP Boy, you’d get your ass-whoop. Sounds like you might benefit from one.

    I originally made a point in my post, talking neither to you nor about you.

    You stick your snout in with a couple of non sequiturs (because you couldn’t refute my post) and then tell me to STFU.

    Your mother should have taught you some manners. Dumb and rude: 2021 America.

    • Agree: anonymousperson
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Corvinus
  270. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    A decent and happily married woman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Angela_of_Liechtenstein

    Prince Maximilian, Princess Angela of Liechtenstein and their son, Prince Alfons.

    Since her marriage, she has maintained a low public profile and routinely declines interviews.

    No whining and no vulgar pretenses on being a “progressive” savior of the world.
    Compare the noble Angela to Meghan Markle, the ambitious friend of Obamas and Clintons.
    Hilary Clinton’s admiration for the “victimized” rich celebrity Meghan Markle:
    https://cnnphilippines.com/world/2021/3/9/Meghan-Markle-interview-British-tabloid-Hilary-Clinton.html
    Perhaps, a cognitive decline prevents Clinton from remembering her great accomplishments in Libya which currently features slave markets. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-security-rights-idUSKBN1GX1JY

    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  271. Mike Tre says:
    @annamaria

    “Brits had provided an army to protect Sasson’s ”

    Wrong – 1 half Brit – Queen Victoria. Bought and paid for by the British East India Company (Rothschilds)

    It is a mistake at best to conflate the wants of a nation’s people with the wants of its rulers. In this case it’s purposely disingenuous.

    To your point about the American math team being composed of Asians – Asian contributions to mathematics were nil until they were introduced to Western math.

    It’s cute that they came up with a few inventions 1000’s of years ago but what were Chinese innovations comprised of in the 1st 2/3’s of the 20th century, while western men dominated research, math and technology?

    All your examples do is point to what most of us know already: Asians are replicators, not innovators.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Marckus
  272. @annamaria

    Finally, the still-living tradition of learning great poetry by heart is magnificent.

    How true. British students at one time could recite Homer in Greek.

    Imho the three greatest poetic languages are Classical Hebrew, Classical Chinese, and Homeric Greek.

    For depth of thought and spiritual passion Biblical Hebrew is unmatched.

    For its fusion of nature poetry with Confucian ethics and deep personal sensibility T’ang poetry is unique. The pictographic quality of many characters immerses the reader in the verse in a way alphabetic languages cannot.

    For power and dynamism Homer’s Greek stands out. One is transported three thousand years into the past to the age of heroes.

    All three early languages enrich the human race beyond words.

  273. Here’s a general observation I’ve made about blacks– the closer they are to White, the bigger the chip on their shoulder and the more vicious they are.

    Just got out of hospital for osteomyelitis (bone infection) in arm, and out of about 15 blacks who worked there, only one was a real bitch (the quadroon). To my surprise I got on well with all the others to the point where my black roommate invited me every morning to go smoke his menthol cigarettes with him on balcony and we’d both bitch about hospital. Decent guy. I expected with all the BLM shit on TV they’d all be angry and militant, but 14/15 I encountered was actually decent much as I may be loathe to admit as much.

  274. Iris says:
    @Mefobills

    Was/is she actually just a weakling?

    The Queen of the UK is not a weakling. Alongside her fifth cousin former Queen Beatrix of the Netherland, they own large shares in oil companies such as Shell, and in the background very much supported imperialist wars for oil. It is Queen Beatrix’ father, Prince Bernhard who created the Bilderberg Club, the first globalist secret society.

    Queen Elizabeth has played a nefarious role in the background, as she holds reserve powers even parliamentarians are not aware off. Her special powers include the ownership of Canada’s lands, the only ever autocratic dismissal of a Labour Australian Prime Minister, and by-passing the UK Parliament to bomb Iraq:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2262613/Queen-Prince-Charles-given-39-chances-veto-legislation-dont-want-law.html

    There is nothing to be liked about the British monarch’s role: she is mostly a joker card in the hands of the oligarchy, to bypass democratic processes when needed, and gets rewarded for it.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  275. @robwin

    Did not know that but it would fit in with rest of the Boston Brahmin layabouts. All of the Zionist Jew controlled puppet actors are just figure heads for the goyim to focus on. I remember the Camelot image with the vigorous “family man.” The Jew MSM media and their magazines always had articles about Rose and the wonderful Kennedy family. The Kennedys had to have lots of stroke in Massachusetts for Teddy to get away with the Kopechne murder.

    There has to always be a fake narrative and a crisis to keep the goyim moving along so as to gain more gov. control. In those days it was the Cold War fraud using the “powerful Soviet Union” that could not even feed its own people and required constant aid from Jewmerica just to keep it propped up.

  276. Truth says:
    @AceDeuce

    No, LARP Boy, you’d get your ass-whoop. Sounds like you might benefit from one.

    LMFAO! Part Deux.

    https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh92C7rBujUyfTa671

  277. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    Respectfully disagree with your assessment.

    Mrs. Markle is an opportunistic grifter who has been used by the usual arsonists. She has been superbly useful at sawing the discontent in the US and the UK. Thank you very much.

    At what point exactly the black billionaire Oprah meets the white mother of three who has been waiting for 10 years before marrying the heir to the British throne? – Nowhere.

    What about Markle being tirelessly promoted by the zionzed MSM? Or you believe that the Obama-Clinton endorsement of Meghan Markle was against zionist wishes?

    Also, since when Markle is “black?” She was always officially white. She was never into “black causes.” She always identified herself as a white person and preferred to be among wealthy white people.

    Markle was a suit-girl promoted by her white (and award-winning) father, whom this woman of a snake has abused and defamed. I do not know about your cultural traditions, but to my understanding, children must respect their parents, particularly when (as in Markle’s case) a parent has given love and care, and provided expensive private school/college education as well as useful professional connections.

    She is a rabid fame-seeker. Check the lawsuits that these two “discriminated victims” have already initiated: https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2021/01/17/what-the-world-has-learned-about-the-sussexes/

    Moreover, Markle was known as a bully before she entered the lavish royal quarters (with Prince Charles leading the vulgar ingrate).

    https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2019/07/07/thomas-markle-senior-v-rachel-markle/

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  278. annamaria says:
    @Mike Tre

    “Asian contributions to mathematics were nil until they were introduced to Western math.”
    — It is not hard to google “Chinese mathematics.” You are for a surprise.

    As for the Sassons, are you aware of the ethnic group the Sassons-opium traders belonged to?
    Enjoy: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/David_Sassoon

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  279. Corvinus says:
    @anonymousperson

    Did those groups call themselves “white”?

  280. Corvinus says:
    @AceDeuce

    Thanks for the gamma tell.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  281. Iris says:
    @Avery

    Compactly and fully describing the dimwit half of the repugnant pair.

    Maybe Prince Harry is a “dimwit”, but he has reasons to be a most screwed up person, considering that he was brought up by the people presiding over the state apparatus and intelligence services that murdered his mother.
    It is a very strange situation to owe the love and care one needs to grow up, to the very people who took the life of one’s beloved mother.

    There has been harsh things said about Lady Diana Spencer; but she was not just a shallow celebrity. It must be remembered that before she got murdered, she undertook a pro-peace crusade of unprecedented courage, as she bravely embraced a global campaign to eradicate landmines, a business worth over USD 1 billion at the time. She was killed for a reason.

    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @Avery
    , @annamaria
  282. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “The national socialists did observe differences between white ethnics. I’m detecting snark in your comment. Maybe I’m off-base and it is honest inquiry, if so I apologize in advance.”

    No snark at all. It wasn’t just national socialists, but Europeans in general.

    “Grant was just one in a long line of thinkers who thought about European racial differences.”

    Except that Europeans are but one race–white. Grant (and Tedore) are essentially discussing ethnic differences.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  283. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Are you sure he wasn’t talking about Jews – or their blood-cousins the Moslems ?

  284. @annamaria

    Oh, anna-the dumber they come the more arrogant and racist. You can’t call it hubris, because it’s so low-rent, but Nemesis looks the same.

  285. Avery says:
    @Iris

    {“There has been harsh things said about Lady Diana Spencer;”}

    I know.
    From what is publicly known, she was a decent human being.
    She was treated awfully by Charles the Moron (..or fill in your favourite adjective)
    Having an affair with a married woman much older than Diana, and, sorry, with a face of a horse.

    I would understand if some juvenile said things like that, but I what kind of (biologically) grown man says this:

    [CHARLES: Oh, God. I’ll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!
    CAMILLA (laughing): What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? (Both laugh). Oh, you’re going to come back as a pair of knickers.
    CHARLES: Or, God forbid, a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)
    CAMILLA: You are a complete idiot! (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.
    CHARLES: My luck to be chucked down a lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down.
    CAMILLA (laughing): Oh darling!
    CHARLES: Until the next one comes through.
    CAMILLA: Oh, perhaps you could just come back as a box.
    CHARLES: What sort of box?
    CAMILLA: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.
    CHARLES: That’s true.
    CAMILLA: Repeating yourself … (laughing). Oh, darling, oh I just want you now.]

    As to the excuse why Harry turned out the way he did: sorry, I don’t buy it.
    Prince Willian went through the same trials and tribulations: father’s affair, loss of their mother. And he was older than Harry, more aware of things, so would have been affected more.
    But he turned out normal.
    Harry is just a bad apple.
    Or maybe Willian is the exception, since both Charles and Andrew are major screwups too. Maybe it runs in the family.

  286. @Mefobills

    All that eugenicist stuff is rather tedious, but it’s time seems come again, and off it slouches.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  287. @CanSpeccy

    Fair ’nuff, speccy, but the degree of climate chaos is the problem. After all when computers were introduced, meteorologists really thought that weather prediction was just around the corner. But then Lorenz accidentally discovered the problem of ‘sensitivity to initial conditions’ popularised as the Butterfly Effect. And when you’ve added zettajoules of energy to the system, the butterfly turns into a giga-Mothra, and there goes the relative climate stability that allowed ‘Civilization’ to rise. As for CO2 toxicity, all I can say is-keep that mask firmly affixed!

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  288. @Truth

    I’m confused. Help me out here, please:

    What part of those three excerpts from the “childish, backbiting and juvenile” article which YOU chose are factually incorrect ?

    Thought so.

    • Replies: @Truth
  289. @James J O'Meara

    I suspect that was simply because the narrow-view WASP / British Protestant establishment is very far from being any kind of “expert” in any sense – nor ever wants to be – on the tribulations of the minority American Episcopalian denomination.

    Is that really such a surprise to you, an anti- establishment Catholic ?

  290. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    And when you’ve added zettajoules of energy to the system, the butterfly turns into a giga-Mothra, and there goes the relative climate stability that allowed ‘Civilization’ to rise.

    Yeah. Wonder what happens when you take zettajoules of energy out of the system with millions of gigantic windmills. Will that not stop the Jet Stream or the Gulf Stream or something?

    Oh and then there are the solar panels that convert 20% of the incoming radiant energy to electricity while transferrring the other 80% to the atmosphere as sensible heat. Apparently, that could turn the Sahara into another Amazon forest — I forget now how.

    The best thing, really, if Prince Charles and his mates were gonna have a scamdemic, would have been to release something like the bubonic plague — not that I’m personally keen to exit this world so aided.

  291. Mefobills says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Eugenics is improvement of race/humans.

    Eugenics was formerly done by harsh environments and natural selection; man’s long march was evolution at work, which was eugenics in action.

    Your ancestors were eugenicists, otherwise they would not have lived to reproduce.

    It is only modern man that makes excuses for dysgenics. Some people make fun of this modern tendency, for example the movie idiocracy. The very fact that the movie is popular and strikes a cord with people, is that they instinctively know that we are in a dysgenic cycle.

    Knee jerk reaction again, where your false programming is taking over? You were wrong about fascism, what else are you wrong about?

  292. @AndrewR

    Your two sentences are 100% self-contradictory – and therefore patently absurd.

  293. Why do blacks hate us?

    Because we’re successful and they aren’t.

  294. HVM says:

    Quote:

    “the voice of Anglo-Saxon history and Christian traditions; recovering WASPs [White Anglo-Saxon Protestants] around the world must pray for a Patriot King who, instead of abetting the divisions of his people . . . will endeavor to unite them, and to be himself the center of this union.”

    Isn’t that what Hitler was trying to achieve? A homogeneous nationalist Germany- no?

    The British acted contrary to that idea and I doubt they are smart enough to become a magnate as defender of western culture (which Hitler claimed to be doing) which is on trial in a kangaroo court…

    The English professoriate hates England and its legacy. An England in defense of of St. George’s cross or Henry V is the antithesis of modern England. Its culture and intellectuals have adopted the concept of multiculturalism which is openly hostile to any notion of English homogeneity. Rather it is more likely the remaining royals will continue self flagellate themselves. The money from Parliament’s is too easy. To find a backbone and to go against the culture industry which Parliament has subsidized would meet a strong resistance indeed. While I like Prince Charles, look at how he has evolved as a leader. As a leader, he has gone astray. To remain popular among the global elites, he has adopted some of the most loony globalist ideas which run contrary to any notion of English nationalism.

    It would have been better had Edward the VIII remained king and got rid of that worthless American harlot who only messed with his mind as much as Markle is doing to Prince Harry. It is also too bad England and Germany did not unite to defend the west. I digress here though because most readers here understand the forces working against western civilization and I do not have time to write a book in this message board to explain how the western world has committed slow suicide over the last 100 years.

    Look at Europe now. The refugee crisis alone should have been a red alert message enough, but defending a homogeneous unified west was not on the agenda. Defending a WASP England will not be the case for a future England either. Look at how they attack Prince Phillip on the Crown (which I have not watched but have heard enough people talking about as if it is actual history)!

  295. Does Markle look black to you?? Me neither. She is obviously 100% white and the black woman who says she’s the mother is not the birth mother. Markle has gone the rachel dolezal route and decided years ago to say she was black to get all the affirmative action black privilege.

    • Replies: @Truth
  296. Marckus says:
    @Mike Tre

    Anna Maria is right about Chinese mathematics. Imagine the complicated math required to design the chop stick and the complexity of the abacus required to do the calculations,

    This remarkable invention is also multi purpose. I understand the Chinese attach a cotton swab at the end for the anal virus test.

    Look, we whites use spoons, knives and forks. These people use two sticks to eat and noisily slurp their soup from the bowl, like monkeys. They have certainly surpassed us after thousands of years.

    The genius of it all and of this race !

    • Troll: Iris
    • Replies: @annamaria
  297. @stevennonemaker88

    They were stupid and greedy.
    Now they beg Rothschilds Inc for jobs. Most of Jeb Bush’s net worth is due to serving R. This is the tragedy of Europe and the Diaspora: corruption of it’s elites.
    Very stupid to abandon unity and be picked off, one by one.

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
  298. @stevennonemaker88

    They were stupid and greedy.
    Now they beg Rothschilds Inc for jobs. Most of Jeb Bush’s net worth is due to serving R. This is the tragedy of Europe and the Diaspora: corruption of it’s elites.
    Very stupid to abandon unity and be picked off, one by one.

  299. Truth says:
    @Dave Bowman

    When 9th grade cheerleaders slut shame their rivals, I’m sure a bit of it is factually correct. that still doesn’t mean I give a shit.

    You see Davey, I’m a man.

  300. Truth says:
    @Hang All Text Drivers

    and the black woman who says she’s the mother is not the birth mother.

    You have insider information?

    Please, reveal your sources, Ellery Queen.

  301. Diversity is a terrible idea. Mixing races and languages and cultures always leads to trouble.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  302. annamaria says:
    @Marckus

    Whatever your ethnic background (supposedly of a Semitic kind, judging from the jolly supremacist spirit of your post), the Asians not only have a higher IQ than the population of the Jewish State (IQ=94, despite a sizeable infusion of the educated Soviet Jews) but they had indeed created sophisticated math before Europeans:

    A textbook called “Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art” (written over a period of time from about 200 BCE onwards) became an important tool in the education… It was particularly important as a guide to how to solve equations – the deduction of an unknown number from other known information – using a sophisticated matrix-based method which did not appear in the West until Carl Friedrich Gauss re-discovered it at the beginning of the 19th Century (and which is now known as Gaussian elimination).

    There is another interesting morsel for you to contemplate:

    Zhu Zaiyu (1536 – 1611) was a Chinese mathematician, physicist, choreographer, and musician. … In 1584, Prince Zhu innovatively described Equal Temperament via accurate mathematical calculation.

    Europeans used this Chinese formula for ET since the second half of the 16th century.

    Rather boring news: “China claims fastest quantum computer in the world” https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/china-claims-fastest-quantum-computer-in-the-world/ar-BB1bI8CM

    • Replies: @Iris
  303. Franz says:
    @CanSpeccy

    The Queen not only has the authority to dissolve parliament, but as head of the armed forces can, presumably, order the government be taken out and shot.

    Too bad she can’t and won’t. That means the UK, much of the Commonwealth is in the same straits: All the real power niches in these nations are occupied by people who say things like “countries are just lines on a map” and “nations are only a figure of speech” — right, traitors.

    Then JFK might really have been onto something when he noted that when peaceful change can’t happen, violent revolutions are all that’s left. But what sort of revolution follows generations of open borders, economic degradation, and criminal slander of ethnic base populations? This might lead to an era of chaos and brutality civilized men can’t even imagine.

    When nationalism becomes illegal — and in the States it almost is following 6 January — we’ll see how things get when large numbers of citizens at last turn on the whole damn regime, from dogcatchers on up.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  304. Iris says:
    @annamaria

    Rather boring news: “China claims fastest quantum computer in the world”

    There’s nothing boring about such news: it is absolutely extraordinary.

    The Chinese are actually about 2 decades ahead of the US and Europe in terms of Quantum Internet in general.

    They have had a Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Network of over 2000km long connecting all main Chinese city for several years now.

    https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/14/103409/what-is-quantum-communications/#:~:text=China%20is%20in%20the%20vanguard%20of%20the%20push,intercontinental%2C%20QKD-secured%20video%20conference%2C%20between%20Beijing%20and%20Vienna.

    In 2017 already, they had successfully achieved quantum-encrypted communications from Earth to satellite, then back to Earth, which materialised in the famous Vienna -Beijing Quantum conference.

    https://physicsworld.com/a/beijing-and-vienna-have-a-quantum-conversation/

    China has 70% of the world’s 5G base stations, while the US telecom monopolies continue gaslighting US consumers into believing that they run 5G.
    Such sophisticated infrastructure already allows the “Internet of things” to operate in China, with people in the most remote areas having the comfort to make bookings, payments, bank transfers, use cryptocurrencies with their phones in fractions of seconds.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Mefobills
  305. AceDeuce says:
    @Corvinus

    And the king wanker chimes in….I don’t know what you’re talking about with your
    “gamma tell” idiocy, but that’s oddly preferable to the posts of yours that I can understand. Those show just how stupid a person can be.

  306. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Franz

    This might lead to an era of chaos and brutality civilized men can’t even imagine.

    Perhaps, but do you really believe so?

    I am sure in the backwoods there are men with rifles who could turn on the tyrannical bastards with their moronic mask mandates, their lockdowns, and their promotion of woke bullshit in academia.

    But will the vast majority support them?

    We in the city are mostly soft. We don’t own guns. I never had one. The idea of owning one scares me. The sight of blood horrifies me. I’m old, I have cash in the bank, all I want is to be left to die in peace. The last thing I want is violence on my street, curfews, soldiers with weapons at the ready patrolling my town.

    If I have a plan, should the worst come to the worst, it is to head for the bush: to live like those Russian Old Believers who disappeared into the Siberian wilderness to live out the remainder of their lives in total isolation from civilization.

    In my unwarlike timidity, am I so unusual? I wish I was, but I suspect I’m not. We’ve already seen how readily the mass of people in the Western nations tolerate the lockdown destruction of large parts of the national economy on dubious medical grounds.

    Moreover, even if we could be roused to fight and die for freedom and universal enlightenment, where is the plan? Who are the leaders? What feasible means could there possibly be for citizens acting outside the institutions of government to defeat the ongoing transition to tech-tyranny?

    Thus I think that transition to a Chinese-style system of social control will go virtually without hitch. Our destination, perhaps mankind’s final destination, looks to be a drone-like existence reminiscent of the lives of the colonial insects, controlled by Musk’s brain chip, Gates’ vaccines, Sergey Brin’s big data on every Google user, and the Democratic Party’s election fixing machine.

    • Replies: @Franz
  307. Vojkan says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Exactly. The difference is not in brainpower, the difference is in refraining from doing harm. People for whom the end justifies the means always have a head start over people for whom a moral end cannot be achieved by immoral means. In effect, the former’s ends require much less brainpower than the latter’s.

  308. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    It is easy to look skeptically upon the British Royal House. However, one should be careful when accusing others of murder: https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/news/a17134/ken-wharfe-memoir-princess-diana-bodyguard/

    Rees-Jones was the sole survivor of the crash that killed Diana, Dodi Fayed, and driver Henri Paul. He had been appointed by the Fayed family to protect Diana during their trip to Paris, but Wharfe [Diana’s royal protection officer for six years] alleges Rees-Jones was never briefed by police and had a misunderstanding of the paparazzi as an “enemy” he could beat. Plus, because he was hired by the Fayeds, he was prevented from speaking against their wishes. (Diana had declined the Queen’s offer to have round-the-clock police protection, which Wharfe says led to the security issues in the first place.)

    Wharfe alleges that Rees-Jones should have intervened when Fayed made risky decisions, like ordering Paul to drive although he had allegedly been drinking, and letting Fayed tell Paul to drive too fast to outpace photographers. He also says the security team should have called local Paris police for backup, and Rees-Jones should have insisted everyone in the car wear his or her seatbelt.

    “I can say with certainty, drawing on decades of police experience, that Diana’s death was not murder but a dreadful accident that should have been avoided,” Wharfe wrote. “She was not the victim of shadowy figures who regarded her as an embarrassment to the Establishment, but of her boyfriend’s erratic behavior and her bodyguard’s mistakes.”

    Rees-Jones, for his part, has said under oath that he has no concrete memories of the car crash that killed Diana, because he suffered a head injury in the collision. He told a jury during an investigation that he had been unhappy with Fayed’s plans that night, but “went along with it.”

    Don’t forget that this story involved two wealthy and willful people who wanted to have everything their way.

    What we are sure about is the perfidious Albion’s treatment of the Political prisoner Julian Assange. The treatment has been despicable, indecent, and murderous — a dirty stain on the nation’s reputation.

  309. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    That phrase was tailored for “@Marckus.”

    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @Iris
  310. Vojkan says:
    @annamaria

    You are right about Meghan Markle but the fact that she’s a bitch doesn’t turn the British royal family into saints. She is just a bitch. They are criminals. There is indeed a difference in degrees.

  311. Malla says:
    @Mefobills

    Günther argued that just as competition can motivate people, the merger of different bloodlines creates a conflict within the psyche of the individual or population itself,

    This concept is there in Hindu wisdom.

    The beautiful half Kabyle Berber-Half German French actress Isabelle Adjani claimed that her North African side and her European side were never at peace with each other or something of that sort.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  312. With apologies to Justice Thomas, Larry Elder and Thomas Sowell:

    No universe, galaxy, solar system, planet, landmass, continent, country, nation, government, state, territory, kingdom, county, city, borough, town, village, neighborhood, college or kindergarten has ever been improved by a large influx of Negroes.

    Noseberg’s greatest achievement next to usury was turning once-contained, violent, low IQ liabilities into objects of suicidal veneration and worship.

  313. Iris says:
    @annamaria

    Thanks, dear Annamaria. I understood that you were trying to educate a commenter so incredibly ignorant that you tried to convey your message in the simplest possible fashion so his simple mind could understand it.

    You are entirely right in the argument you are making. China’s actual scientific advance is now so great that the West can never catch up with it in the foreseeable future.

    As for its past going as late as Ancient Egypt, China always was a great civilisation in its own right, which knowledge and advancement owe nothing to our civilisation, born in the Mediterranean Basin.

    • Thanks: annamaria
  314. hotrod31 says:

    What a hatchet piece on Ms Markle.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  315. Hibernian says:
    @CanSpeccy

    The accession of William of Orange to the throne of England marked the ascendancy of Parliament, and the end of absolute monarchy based on the Stuart notion of divine right.

    What you’re saying is a more genteel version of what I said. They both were put in power by Parliament.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  316. Hibernian says:
    @Malla

    They were not even required to raise troops for the defence of their own frontiers except of their own free will,

    This ignores the militia laws.

    They didn’t “raise” troops. They were troops.

    The British made the mistake of sending religious fanatics to colonize a rich land thinly populated by indigenous people. It was an own goal.

  317. Hibernian says:
    @annamaria

    Unfortunately even the now greatly reduced stature of the UK is still greater than that of Liechtenstein.

  318. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Hibernian

    They both were put in power by Parliament.

    I don’t believe that John Curchill, who stood down British armed forces during the Dutch invasion, was either a member of Parliament or a servant of anything but his own interest. For his assistance in the revolution, William III made him a Duke.

  319. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    Except that Europeans are but one race–white. Grant (and Tedore) are essentially discussing ethnic differences.

    Even anthropologists argue your point. Some think that European/Whites evolved out of three distinct people groups – or perhaps more.

    Evolution only needs about three generations to start creating differences. Epigenetics seems to reinforce that concept.

    Ethnic vs Race was called “race” in the past, so that is why I use it. Some birds can reproduce and create fertile off-spring, but they are categorized as separate races. The birds choose NOT to reproduce with each other – where humans do not restrict themselves.

    There were differences in white ethnics, and there are GREATER differences between blacks vs whites, etc.

    Genetic distance is probably a better term than race. But, humans don’t have probabilistic words, the words of human language tend to categorize people.

    Mixing differing tribes of large genetic distance together into a small area, is a bad idea.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  320. Mefobills says:
    @Iris

    Such sophisticated infrastructure already allows the “Internet of things” to operate in China, with people in the most remote areas having the comfort to make bookings, payments, bank transfers, use cryptocurrencies with their phones in fractions of seconds.

    Am I a broken record? I have to keep reminding people that the American System of Economy created an explosion of scientific achievement.

    The Chinese industrial capitalism system is basically the American System of Economy.

    It is all so predictable, that they will pull ahead. Germany, when it adopted the system, exploded with new scientific and physical economy.

    The U.S. uses finance capitalism, and a very large part of the economy is speculative capital. This speculation helps fund new companies to be risky, but China also has a “section” of their economy set aside for speculation on the future. That risk and bet taking in the U.S. used to be walled off with Glass-Steagall.

    Chinese have enough intellectual firepower to move ahead, and anybody who denies this is whistling past the graveyard. The distribution of creative genius in the population may be less, but you only need a few of these types of people.

    For example, Putin recently lauded the 15 or so “kids” who invented Avangard system (Hypersonic glide vehicle).

    That a white country produces high level genius from a small population base is no surprise, it should also be no surprise that China produces high level genius too, but from a larger population base. The middle distribution of normal Chinese are an advantage, where their averages are a little more intelligent.

    Why are eyes not focused on the real locus; that is the economic determinates – by far the largest variable? People get all butt-hurt about China as if it is a racial attack – when its not.

  321. TGD says:
    @Skeptikal

    I don’t think Harry looks anything like Phil
    Except for the lighter hair.
    But Philip is blond and where did Harry get the curly red hair ?

    You can inherit blond hair and blue eyes from just 1 parent. In order to have red hair, both parents must pass on the gene that produces this coloring.

    The mutation may have originated in Asia Minor. There is strong evidence to suggest that the Celts’ ancestral homeland was Asia Minor. Though the Celts spread out over most of Europe, those that populated the British Isles migrated there by way of Spain.

    Both Diana and Hewitt have that Celtic look. Charles does not. In fact, it’s hard to gauge what Charles’ real ancestry is from his strange appearance.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/science/05cnd-brits.html

    https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/were-nearly-all-celts-under-skin-2480644

  322. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Some think that European/Whites evolved out of three distinct people groups – or perhaps more.”

    Who are these specific anthropologists? Moreover, what do you exactly mean by “people groups”? Is that reference directed toward race? ethnicity? “breeds”?

    “Evolution only needs about three generations to start creating differences. Epigenetics seems to reinforce that concept.”

    Are you referencing the animal kingdom in general or specifically the human race?

    “Ethnic vs Race was called “race” in the past, so that is why I use it.”

    I would contend that those terms are NOT interchangeable. They are unique and separate. Of course, we as humans have grouped people into races based on the traits they think are most important. The way we categorize people into races has changed over time. Refer to the Irish and the Italians. Today we would categorize them as white. But those two groups a century and a half ago were not considered the same “race” as Americans with European origins. It was other than surprising, as that notion reflected a general attitude of the time period–“race” was a mixture of biological and cultural traits.

    So, what are you–So, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? Would you agree or disagree that each group ought to refrain from procreating with one another, lest “undesirable” traits be assumed by the offspring and thus “dilute” the gene pool?

    “Some birds can reproduce and create fertile off-spring, but they are categorized as separate races.”

    No, they are categorized as living orders and families, then to individual species.

    “The birds choose NOT to reproduce with each other – where humans do not restrict themselves.”

    Where mate choice exists, one sex tends to be competitive and one sex is choosy (i.e. selective). It is preferable for that bird choose a compatible mate of the same species, in order to maintain reproductive success. Human beings indeed do not restrict themselves, as they have free will to make their own decisions as to what attributes they find desirable in a mate.

    “There were differences in white ethnics, and there are GREATER differences between blacks vs whites, etc.”

    Assumed differences in some cases based on subjective criteria.

    “Genetic distance is probably a better term than race.”

    So, you use “race” to describe “race and ethnicity”, but believe “genetic distance” is actually more appropriate. How do you define “genetic distance”? Would you say there was a “genetic distance” between Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean? How about between American white subgroups?

    “But, humans don’t have probabilistic words, the words of human language tend to categorize people.”

    And within those categories is the explanation for those “probabilities”.

    “Mixing differing tribes of large genetic distance together into a small area, is a bad idea.”

    Now you using the word “tribe”. Is a “tribe” a “race”? Is there “genetic distance” between tribes? What evidence are you able to cite that lends support to your statement? What metrics are you employing here that constitutes, in your view, as a “bad idea”?

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Mefobills
  323. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Moshe Kohn of the Jewish post reported in 2005 that Churchills mother was the daughter of Leonard Jerome, Jewish owner of The New York Times. He was a close friend of the Rothschilds representative in America August Belmont. He changed his name from Jacobson to Jerome. There used to be lots more on Jewnet but the ADL PC police are careful to scrub most real information.

    Do you think the alcoholic war monger and con man Churchill came up from nothing? All of the Zionist operatives have connections. The internet has scrubbed most information and relevant blood lines to be replaced by fake stories.

  324. @Mark Tapley

    It is exactly David Irving who has debunked the rumor that Churchill’s mother was Jewish. Google: fpp.co.uk Churchill’s “Jewish mother”, and see for yourself.

  325. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    Who are these specific anthropologists? Moreover, what do you exactly mean by “people groups”? Is that reference directed toward race? ethnicity? “breeds”?

    Anthropologist use skeletons, and if there is enough difference, the skeletons are classified. Today, DNA markers and language are helping anthropologists get a better picture of the past.

    The white race is mostly Cro-Magnon and some group from the Pontic Steppes. There are other off-shoots, some red nordics who co-evolved along with neanderthals on the top of the mountains. We are talking time scales in the tens of thousand of years, with differential evolution.

    Things sped up after the last ice age, and various types/races/tribes of humans accelerated migrations.

    Past historians used “race” when they should have been saying ethnicity, or breed. If the progeny of two species is infertile, then it is two distinct races. Enough genetic distance has caused divergence.

    In the case of humans, it is quite likely that divergent evolution could have created separate races given separation and time.

    Assumed differences in some cases based on subjective criteria.

    It’s not subjective, it can be measured. If I bet you that the next sprinter to win in the Olympics would have west african DNA, you would Yawn. If I bet you that the next sprinter to win in the Olympics would be a north east asian, you would probably take that bet, and then take my money after you won. You would be stupid to not take the bet. You are lying to yourself when you say it is subjective. Don’t lie to yourself.

    And within those categories is the explanation for those “probabilities”.

    Our language tries to deal with probabilities, but it doesn’t do a good job. If we use a computer to communicate, then I can send you venn diagrams, and statistical curves, and then the nature of the language has changed. There are overlaps in human populations, and then there are differences, and to say otherwise is not honest.

    Clown world even is trying to tell us that there is no differences between the sexes.

    “Mixing differing tribes of large genetic distance together into a small area, is a bad idea

    Humans evolved in tribes, and historians called them races. Race as a term became used widely, especially when there were obvious genetic differences. For example, there was always three main races of man according to older anthropology, especially during the age of exploration: Negroes, Asian, and Caucasian. (South Asians were considered caucasoids.)

    Now you using the word “tribe”. Is a “tribe” a “race”? Is there “genetic distance” between tribes? What evidence are you able to cite that lends support to your statement? What metrics are you employing here that constitutes, in your view, as a “bad idea”?

    Humans are tribal. An extended family can become a tribe. If the tribe is isolated to a geographic region for long enough, and becomes large enough, it will become a race. Those tribes in the northern latitude developed characteristics to deal with their environment, and same goes for those who evolved in the equatorial regions. Using this criteria, there are many races of negroes, with large genetic differences because they evolved in separate areas of Africa. Nobody would say a pygmy is the same as a Tutsi.

    What metrics are you employing here that constitutes, in your view, as a “bad idea”?

    It is self evident, that if you put differing types of humans together that it will cause social friction. Humans are tribal and want to live among their own kind. Evolution probably prefigured us for this as a way to develop trust, as outsiders would often bring disease and war.

    I suggest that you read Putnam’s book “bowling alone” especially if your brain is infected with liberalism. He was a liberal himself, and had to admit to his data.

    https://www.saddleback.edu/faculty/agordon/documents/Bowling_Alone.pdf

    Integration does mean ruination, it is confirmed with data. It is not about what you like or don’t, nor is it about emotion.

    UNZ has a large section on HBD (Human Bio-Diversity).

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  326. DrWatson says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    So when you wonder into a black neighborhood at night (or even broad daylight like I did once by getting off the C train at 145th street in Manhattan and quickly going back into the subway, seeing all that desolation around), will you start discussing statistics, culture and policy with the locals or will you quickly retreat into safe white neighborhoods?

    You just have to go with your hunch and common sense sometimes even if that means you have ‘racist’ prejudices, assuming the worst might happen, even though of course not all black folks are murderous. Where do you live, anyway?

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  327. Marylou says:
    @obwandiyag

    A nickel for every incompetent, ignorant boob…..?

    Do you realize you have to deal with twenty of them just to get one dollar? How rich were you thinking of? Must be some world you live in.

  328. annamaria says:
    @hotrod31

    Two millionaires and professional victims, Mr. and Mrs. Meghan Markle, whined about their intolerable life to a fighter with white privilege billionaire Oprah.
    Many commenters are surprised that the black woman Oprah has been completely blind to the light-skinned “dutchess”‘ total and absolute preference for white wealthy men, exclusively, no exception.
    At least the suitcase “actress” almost avoided defaming her old and ailing white father. The dimwit Harry Markle did not give a second thought about trashing the RF globally, even while his very old granddad has been staying in a hospital.

    • Replies: @Truth
  329. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luigi_Luca_Cavalli-Sforza

    Cavalli-Sforza popularized the idea of genetic distances in human populations. If you pull on the thread for this, you can self-educate yourself. Or, read up on HBD – it is a large field of study.

    Sforza thinks that there is only one race, the human race – and that is certainly one way to look at things.

    Others, can use Sforza’s data to make the case that genetic distance matters in populations of humans.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2018/09/genetic-differences-justify-racism-luigi-luca-cavalli-sforza/

    You will have to make up your own mind. Me? I’m going to go with Putnam and social science, and then overlay that with Sforza.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  330. Anonymous[302] • Disclaimer says:

    You keep saying it is a race thing when it is obviously a gay thing. Homosexuals with reactionary or aristocratic tastes may live in cities but tend not to work in metropolitan media/entertainment, and look down on the homosexuals who do. For compensation the media gays become born-again Marxists. Feminism, BLM, transgenderism, and kids-in-cages are all better understood as gay decadent programs. Of course lots of straight housewives will eat it up because people in charge of propaganda tend to be extremely skilled at their jobs.

  331. Truth says:
    @annamaria

    Many commenters are surprised that the black woman Oprah has been completely blind to the light-skinned “dutchess”‘ total and absolute preference for white wealthy men, exclusively, no exception

    You’ve been living with her since high school?

    • Replies: @annamaria
  332. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Cavalli-Sforza popularized the idea of genetic distances in human populations.”

    Indeed, Cavalli-Sforza “challenges the assumption that there are significant genetic differences between human races, and indeed, the idea that ‘race’ has any useful biological meaning at all”. In other words, he says, people cannot divided into racial groups based on DNA. “HBD realists” and advocates of white supremacy have argued that because genetic variations are associated with particular geographical locations, that is as good as providing a genetic basis for race, an argument that Cavalli-Sforza rejected.

    “You will have to make up your own mind. Me? I’m going to go with Putnam and social science.

    About Putnam…

    “I do need to step back a minute and say I think that the – it’s not merely a fact that America’s becoming more diverse. It’s a benefit. America will – all of us will, over the long run, benefit from being a more diverse, more heterogeneous place. Places that are more diverse have higher rates of growth on average and they have better cuisine. And it’s just a more interesting place to live.”

    “So in the long run, waves of immigration like we’re going through now and that we’ve gone through in the past and increasing diversity is good for a society. But what we discovered in this research, somewhat to our surprise, was that in the short run the more ethnically diverse the neighborhood you live in, the more you – every – all of us tend to hunker down, to pull in. The more diverse – and when I say all of us, I mean all of us. I mean blacks and whites and Asians and Latinos, all of us. The more diverse the group around us, ethnically, in our neighborhood, the less we trust anybody, including people who look like us. Whites trust whites less. Blacks trust blacks less, in more diverse settings.”

    You do have those nativists who have spun Putnam’s research into a “restrict immigration” message, at best, or a “remove all immigrants by force”, at worst.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @mike smith
  333. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    Putnam’s research does bolster the idea that immigration should be restricted.

    He documents how the society has become high friction and low trust, i.e. people bowl-alone and no longer form voluntary associations.

    People who have little in common will not form voluntary associations. He called the effect, “turtling” or pulling your head in.

    It is not good. The only case that can be made for immigration is: 1) You need specialized knowledge and labor – which is what China does. 2) You have a parasitic finance elite running your country, and they want to lower the wage price.

    Exporting jobs is the same thinking as number 2, where jobs are exported to then use cheaper labor over there, to then export back to the U.S., to then do a rake off on prices.

    In both exporting jobs and importing labor, it is wage arbitrage, where finance capital is trying to take outsize gains.

    There is no good argument for immigration unless you need specialized high priced labor, to then build out industry you don’t currently have.

    _________________

    The more diverse the group around us, ethnically, in our neighborhood, the less we trust anybody, including people who look like us. Whites trust whites less. Blacks trust blacks less, in more diverse settings.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @geokat62
  334. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    Again, I ask, which specific anthropologists have surmised “that European/Whites evolved out of three distinct people groups – or perhaps more”?

    “The white race is mostly Cro-Magnon and some group from the Pontic Steppes.”

    I believe some nuance is in order.

    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

    When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European’s skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.

    But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.

    Then, the first farmers from the Near East arrived in Europe; they carried both genes for light skin. As they interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.

    “Humans are tribal. An extended family can become a tribe. If the tribe is isolated to a geographic region for long enough, and becomes large enough, it will become a race.”

    And there is an enormous difference between ethnic group and tribe. Ethnic group refers to those who share a language, culture, history, and home region. Examples include Uzkek, French, and Bantu. “Tribe” refers to a ethnic sub-set within which all or most human activities are organized on the basis of kinship. In parts of Albania, for example, loyalty to tribe takes precedence over “loyalty” to country, religion, or political party. In Kenya, it refers to speakers of a particular language. The Polish, the Chinese, and of course Americans…are not tribes.

    “It is self evident, that if you put differing types of humans together that it will cause social friction.”

    That depends on how one defines “social friction”, as well as its extent and influence on the individual and groups who experience it. Were WASPs “correct” in their assertion to minimize the influence of non-WASPs, specifically Eastern and Southern Europeans, as they entered the shores of the U.S. in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, despite being white and from the same continent?

    “Humans are tribal and want to live among their own kind”.

    And what constitutes wanting to live with “their own kind” differs from person to person and group to group. “My own kind” preference are people who have shared interests and values, and that is not exclusive of race or ethnic group or religion. I may have even entertained the notion of marrying outside of “my own kind”, aka race, because that is of my own free will and choice. Of course, you may think differently, but that is OK.

    “Evolution probably prefigured us for this as a way to develop trust, as outsiders would often bring disease and war.”

    So, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another? Please be specific. Now, you said a tribe can become a race. But the French are not a tribe, nor are they a race. It would appear you are playing an intellectual shell game here. Furthermore, what is the “genetic distance”, say between the modern day English and the modern day Polish? Please be specific.

    “Integration does mean ruination, it is confirmed with data.”

    It is interpreted by some as ruination, and the data can assuredly be biased or skewed towards one’s preference.

    • Replies: @Malla
  335. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Putnam’s research does bolster the idea that immigration should be restricted.”

    I have stated numerous times on this fine opinion webzine that I am not opposed to restricting immigration. What I am opposed to is the notion that Nigerians, Guatamalans, and the Hmong are lack the “social capital” or the “genetic make-up” to immerse themselves into the body politic and cultural fabric of the U.S. We are Mutts.

    “He documents how the society has become high friction and low trust, i.e. people bowl-alone and no longer form voluntary associations.”

    In the short-term, yes. Putnam’s way of measuring trust was for people to rate on a three-point scale whether they would “say that most people can be trusted”. Hmmm, about that ratings system…

    https://www.econlib.org/archives/2017/06/trust_and_diver.html

    “It is not good. The only case that can be made for immigration is: 1) You need specialized knowledge and labor – which is what China does. 2) You have a parasitic finance elite running your country, and they want to lower the wage price.”

    I would say there are many other reasons in favor, and against, immigration.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  336. geokat62 says:
    @Mefobills

    The only case that can be made for immigration is:

    As Prof. MacDonald demonstrated in his Culture of Critique, there’s a third case: You have a hostile elite running your country, and they want to ensure there isn’t another pogrom by transforming a relatively homogeneous society into a more heterogeneous one (see Barbara Lerner Spectre for details).

    • Agree: Mefobills
  337. @Mefobills

    You convey here in a simple sentence what countless articles fail to get across:

    That risk and bet taking in the U.S. used to be walled off with Glass-Steagall.

    The USA’s privately manufactured currency in effect allows the Jew to play for keeps with/from the goyim at the risk to the Jew akin to using board game Monopoly money.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  338. Franz says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Perhaps, but do you really believe so?

    Yes.

    I don’t believe in any of that “Old order passeth away” business. I think it has always and everywhere been murder and destruction, with malice aforethought. No civilization ever died a natural death.

    Right now we’re entering what Tom Chittum called the holocaust of the cities a generation ago. People thought Tom was crazy in the 1990s when he predicted this mess.

    The powers that be will find other ways to get at the outliers and the off-the-grid types, they’ll just take their time about it. Watching the urban and suburban Western World fry, crumble and get more toxic will be fun for them so they’ll stretch it out some. That’ll get the preppers to diminish their stock.

    After? I don’t know, but people who can resort to robot dogs are apt to come up with anything. I lived in the Rust Belt when they showed their worst to a limited audience. That’s when I stopped being any sort of optimist.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  339. Malla says:
    @twoplustwoequalsfive

    The true ruling family of the Yiddish Empire is the Rothschild Royal family

    There are Sephardic families above them like the Sassoons, Kaduri and Dangoors. Rothschilds are their managers.

  340. Malla says:
    @Corvinus

    “My own kind” preference are people who have shared interests and values, and that is not exclusive of race or ethnic group or religion. I may have even entertained the notion of marrying outside of “my own kind”, aka race, because that is of my own free will and choice. Of course, you may think differently, but that is OK.

    Majority people on Earth prefer people of their own ethnic group or tribe.

    • Agree: anonymousperson
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  341. annamaria says:
    @Truth

    The live-in boyfriends have been cataloged. Do your work.
    In case you did not notice, Mrs. M. Markle (unofficial spokesperson for BLM) has spent a fortune on eliminating the visible signs of her black ancestry. So much for building a better world.
    Yes, the suitcase opportunist and grifter has strongly preferred white wealthy man, no exception.
    https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2021/01/17/what-the-world-has-learned-about-the-sussexes/s

    • Replies: @Truth
  342. BuelahMan says:
    @Fr. John

    Goodness. Did I step upon your queen, Oprah?

    • LOL: Truth
  343. @Mark Tapley

    MUCH as I am a fan of David Irving and own all his books and have most of his talks memorized, he tells lies about stupid things since he was a traditionalist was/is obsessed with class and having grown up poor.

    In one lecture from the 80s- he mentioned that his wife came from a Noble Spanish family- his wife’s uncle was shot by thr commies thinking it was her father- abd his first daughter ( born in April first) was named “Victoria” as a middle name in commemoration of Frano’s victory

    When– during the Lipschadt trial the Jews tried to beat him up with this- he claimed his wife’s uncle was killed by Frano’s men- and thst he was totally unaware of his former father-in-law’s profession– ( a chemist) and that he was essentially apolitical- but what little political sympathies he had were with the commies.

    Much asvi enjoy and allreciatechisxwirj- whyvliexaboutcsonetgingvso dumb and open yourself up to attacks from tbevJuden?

  344. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    What I am opposed to is the notion that Nigerians, Guatamalans, and the Hmong are lack the “social capital” or the “genetic make-up” to immerse themselves into the body politic and cultural fabric of the U.S. We are Mutts.

    If civilization were a board game, and you inherited a country like the U.S., which had been turned into a multi-culti shit-hole, and you had to win the game, you would need to devise a strategy. As the game player, you know without question, that immigration of unlike peoples is bad, and has created a big problem.

    1) You don’t demonize your citizens. They are already your people.
    2) You stop immigration immediately, with no exceptions initially.

    The idea is to consolidate and take care of the people you already have. Your existing people are people and they have agency. You want to give them even more agency and return to a high trust civilization.

    3) You initiate the same programs that Hitler used, albeit without the race/jew angle. Hitler was actually correct, that finance capital had busted-out Germany and FC nearly killed the country and German people. Jews were identified as the behind the scenes string pullers who had been doing this rape of Germany. So, the demonization of Jews, while legitimate in NSDAP case, is NOT legitimate in the case of America, or other places were immigrants were invited in. In other words, the immigrants are not to be scapegoated, as they are not the causative factor, only a knock on effect.

    4) Nationalism can function with a disparate population, and as a National Socialist, I have empathy for the minorities around me, but disagree that it is a “good thing.” Only small amounts of immigration are sustainable – otherwise you will lose the game.

    So, to win the game, you have to absorb and homogenize your people into a new race (mixed race). Or, you alternatively have to less mixing, and some enticement for the worst elements to leave – you pay them to leave.

    The worst elements will self identify that they do not want to belong in your country, and/or will volunteer to leave.

    The long arc of history shows that civilizations that polarize into Oligarchy will fail. There is no other conclusion – they ALL have. Everybody in the laboring classes, of all colors, are going to fail together. The National Socialists went after their finance oligarchs, but maybe not quite hard enough.

    Going forward, especially after the collapse, there is going have to be some sort of coming together, and that includes seeing others as people with agency.

  345. Mefobills says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    The USA’s privately manufactured currency in effect allows the Jew to play for keeps with/from the goyim at the risk to the Jew akin to using board game Monopoly money.

    Exactly. The risk is transferred to the population. Heads I win, Tails you Lose.

    Glass Steagall walled off risky finance actors like Wall Street Banking, Hedge Funds, and other speculative capital from retail banking and insurance.

    In other words, GS admitted that Finance Capital should not mix with the producing sectors. Retail banking and insurance is part of the plain vanilla day to day transactions for a functioning production economy, which is where most people live.

    The Jew does operate with usury and finance capital – he invented it. So, this transference of risk onto the Goyim should be no surprise. The transference is euphemized in utterances like those of Goldman Sachs saying that Germans were Muppets. Or, the Goyim are animals to be harvested. Their productive energy is to be used by the parasite.

    The U.S. lost its American System of Economy in stages. In very recent history, the loss of Savings and Loans (Gyro money) and then Graham Leach Bliley act ( which destroyed Glass-Steagall) are examples of how the “agents of Mammon” maneuver.

    If the plumbing in your body is screwed up, with flows of blood that nourish a cancer, then you will die, or at the very least become sick. The cancer is now metastasizing, and the parasites are eating the host.

  346. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Franz

    people who can resort to robot dogs are apt to come up with anything

    Exactly. I could envisage joining a peasants’ revolt — peasants with staves and pitchforks confronting soldiers on horseback with swords and muskets — even though the peasants always seemed to lose. But technology has vastly worsened the odds. My details are surely already programmed into a system that can take me out with a lethal micro-drone any time.

    • Agree: Franz
  347. Truth says:
    @annamaria

    The live-in boyfriends have been cataloged. Do your work.

    Old Sport, following unsubstantiated internet gossip is not my work. It’s yours.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  348. @Hang All Text Drivers

    You are painting with a very broad brush. Much of Western Europe was essentially the fusion of Classical Race, Culture and Language with Germanic. The UK was a mix between the Celts, Anglo Saxon invaders, Danish Vikings, and Normans from France. The Britons had been Romanized for hundreds of years. Many different languages, cultures, and races, depending on how one defines race.

    France, the heart of Europe, takes it’s name from the Franks, Germanic warriors and one of the first tribes to become Christian. They mixed with the native population of Gaul, and adopted Latin as their clerical language and what became french as the common tongue. Spain is the same way, with Visigoth invaders mixing with Celts and Moorish inhabitants.

    In America, any white person was considered part of the same race. But this is NOT how people used to look at race. The Romans did not think the barbarians were the same race; the British did not see the Spanish as the same race; the Saxons did not see the Danes as the same race.

    Granted, their was certainly conflict in and between these different nations. But to say

    Diversity is a terrible idea

    is false.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @mike smith
  349. annamaria says:
    @Truth

    Then don’t show your obsession with the “gossip.”

    Here is Markle’s Jewish wedding (between her being a Catholic and an Anglican):

    https://www.closerweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/duchess-meghan-first-wedding-dress-2.jpg?fit=600%2C666

    She is an omnivore.

    • Replies: @Truth
  350. Truth says:
    @annamaria

    Oh, a 40 year old has been married twice?

    What are the odds of that?

  351. Malla says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    I think there was a better understanding of race and human diversity during the colonial era when Europeans were more or less coming across the whole spectrum of humanity in looks, abilities and behavioral tendencies. Even the Arabs wrote many racist stuff, mostly about Black Africans but the Arab World had no knowledge of much of humanity like in the Americas, Australia, New Zealand, Pacific islands etc…
    Mixing of Germanics and Celts or Slavs and Balts is not exactly the same thing as what is race mixing today.

  352. Malla says:
    @Mefobills

    If civilization were a board game, and you inherited a country like the U.S., which had been turned into a multi-culti shit-hole, and you had to win the game, you would need to devise a strategy.

    If I was leader of some multi-culti multi racial shithole, I would give up. The best and only sensible option would be to loot out as much money as possible as a leader and then get out. In the long term, the place is gonna be forever fucked anyways, no other option. Very difficult.
    I live in India, I know what I speak of.
    I am a brown dude and even I am surprised by why would white countries would do this to themselves with ,mass migration of the sort we have been seeing from WW2. Why? Why destroy your advantage, why join us in the gutter.
    Maybe Christian-Leftist brain damage.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  353. @Mefobills

    Great comment. I would say that limited immigration can actually be healthy. Weaponized, mass migration causes many problems for the host country. Like many things in life, there is a certain range which is good, and beyond that it becomes destructive.

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Replies: @annamaria
  354. Corvinus says:
    @Malla

    “Majority people on Earth prefer people of their own ethnic group or tribe.”

    You mean they prefer people who are similar to them, which includes their ethnic group(s). Tribe? No. Besides, Americans are Mutts. It’s who we are.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Malla
  355. geokat62 says:
    @Malla

    Why? Why destroy your advantage, why join us in the gutter.
    Maybe Christian-Leftist brain damage.

    There is an old saying… “Beware of Greeks Bearing Gifts.”

    This needs to be revised to… “Beware of Talmudists Bearing Tikkun Olam.”

    • Agree: WhiteWinger, Malla
    • Thanks: anarchyst
  356. annamaria says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    “73% of voters concerned about border. Majority oppose amnesty.”
    https://turcopolier.com/73-of-voters-concerned-about-border-majority-oppose-amnesty/

    A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 73% of Likely U.S. Voters are concerned about the government’s ability to handle the growing number of migrants at the border while meeting COVID-19 protocols. That includes 48% who say they are Very Concerned.

    Border crossings have surged since President Joe Biden was elected, and officials in Texas last week expressed alarm at the number of migrants who test positive for the coronavirus and are being released into the United States.

    “they knew the migrant surge was coming”: https://turcopolier.com/they-knew-the-migrant-surge-was-coming-lara-logan/

    Before he enters on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” wiki on US presidency.

    The meaning of this oath is clear. For the president to not seek to enforce federal law is a violation of his oath and an impeachable offense.

  357. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “the U.S., which had been turned into a multi-culti shit-hole…”

    That is a false conclusion.

    “1) You don’t demonize your citizens. They are already your people.”

    Our citizens come from different backgrounds.

    “2) You stop immigration immediately, with no exceptions initially.”

    Again, I would support such a move.

    “You want to give them even more agency and return to a high trust civilization.”

    Assuming that we are other than living in a high trust civilization.

    “Hitler was actually correct, that finance capital had busted-out Germany and FC nearly killed the country and German people.”

    Debatable.

    “Jews were identified as the behind the scenes string pullers who had been doing this rape of Germany.”

    Debatable.

    “Going forward, especially after the collapse…”

    POSSIBLE collapse. I’ve been hearing that same argument for 40+ years.

    “So, to win the game, you have to absorb and homogenize your people into a new race (mixed race).”

    Again, I ask, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another? Please be specific. Now, you said a tribe can become a race. But the French are not a tribe, nor are they a race. It would appear you are playing an intellectual shell game here. Furthermore, what is the “genetic distance”, say between the modern day English and the modern day Polish? Please be specific.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @mike smith
  358. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Again, I ask, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another? Please be specific.

    This ain’t rocket science, Corvy.

    The Old World European countries retain/restore their core ethnic identities and the New World European countries retain/restore their core white identities:

    In March 1790, the newly-formed Congress passed a law establishing the rules for becoming a citizen. The law limited naturalization to “free white person[s] … of good character.”

    So. it’s Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  359. @Priss Factor

    Today, blacks like Meghan and others feel ‘victimized’ by non-blacks who insist it isn’t their sole purpose in life to kiss black ass and wash black feet… Just ask the Palestinians.

    If there is any significant difference between Palestinians and Negroes, it’s hard to discern. You could have wet Yasir Arafat’s lips and stuck them to the Wailing Wall. How are they any different from blacks in the Old South?

    • Replies: @annamaria
  360. Lurker says:
    @acementhead

    He did one tour on the ground, then as a helicopter pilot a few years later.

  361. Anonymous[721] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    This is a mil-shill who recognizes he is losing the argument he has been having here for years.

  362. @DrWatson

    I do have ‘the blonde disease’, if I am honest. I in fact, discuss groupism, as a more accurate term to encompass sexism, racism, and other isms.. I live in London (Richmond), though most of my friends are in Brixton, so I do voice my opinions to a broad audience.

    The lesson to teach is what is being lost now, with the onslaught of Jewish ‘act before you think’ legalism: it is the intention of the speaker that should free or damn them – now whether the one spoken to gets offended.

    Certainly the listener’s emotions matter, but they are not enough to damn any speaker – only the speaker’s intentions can criminalise them.

    This opinion is certainly not popular with a lot of my circle (none of them studied law, whether Roman, customary, Sharia, Buddhist – whatever!), and – at least until the covid tyranny hit and they slowly started waking up – they called me a nazi etc often enough. But hey, I don’t care – I have confidence in the validity of judging myself and my fellow humans by intentions, and given my readings of at least a little of world theology, so are most cultures in the world.

    • Replies: @Iris
  363. Iris says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    I live in London (Richmond), though most of my friends are in Brixton

    Lol, and you make this confession on a thread about Her Majesty the Queen, of all places.. The people on this website will think you are some sort of kamikaze…Why do you like Brixton anyway? Are you a fan of music or just of earthly culinary delights?

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  364. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “The Old World European countries retain/restore their core ethnic identities and the New World European countries retain/restore their core white identities”

    That’s NOT what I asked–What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another? Please be specific.

    “So. it’s Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean.”

    In 1790, but not according to Madison Grant and company 125 years later. Was he and his ilk wrong?

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Mefobills
  365. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    That’s NOT what I asked–What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another? Please be specific.

    What’s the “genetic distance” between Ashkenazi, Sephardi and Mizrahi? Please be specific.

    In 1790, but not according to Madison Grant and company 125 years later. Was he and his ilk wrong?

    It is up to the people of a particular country (through their representatives) to define their immigration policies as they see fit, so long as they truly represent the will of the people and not some special interest group’s subversion of the people’s will.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  366. @Iris

    Richmond is good for the kid – lots of fresh air in the parks and by the river, plus hills to race a bike down and possibly split lips and break bones!

    Brixton is great for the food. The people are as everywhere too – mostly sheep, but I’ve had better debates there than in Richmond, where the hive mind is a bit stronger imo.

    I would rather say that, as my econometrics teacher pleaded with our class – extrapolation is the greatest error of statistics, and groupism is just extrapolation.. from many to one, or from one to many. Nothing else – I discuss group differences with everyone, but people only get really tetchy when you start extrapolating.

    • Replies: @Iris
  367. Malla says:
    @Corvinus

    Besides, Americans are Mutts.

    That is an unfortunate development. Just because you have made mistakes in the past does not mean you must repeat the mistake and take it to a higher intensity. CORRECT the mistakes of the past, not repeat it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  368. annamaria says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Agree that Meghan Markle has been behaving in a conspicuously Jewish manner – like a greedy, whining, and shameless parvenue.
    Interesting, what is her mom Doria’s genetic makeup.

    • Replies: @Iris
  369. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Ah, yes, your old “bait and switch” trick. I know your game here, but I will ask one more time–What is the “genetic distance” of each group (Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean) from one another? Please be specific.

    “It is up to the people of a particular country (through their representatives) to define their immigration policies as they see fit”

    Indeed, as America has done, especially recently (1965). It’s our posterity.

    “so long as they truly represent the will of the people and not some special interest group’s subversion of the people’s will.”

    And that’s where the debate lies.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  370. Corvinus says:
    @Malla

    “That is an unfortunate development.”

    According to Who/Whom?

    “Just because you have made mistakes in the past does not mean you must repeat the mistake and take it to a higher intensity. CORRECT the mistakes of the past, not repeat it.”

    Assuming, of course, that race and ethnic mixing is a “mistake of the past”.

  371. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    And that’s where the debate lies.

    Debate? lol

  372. the Church of England, British culture, and the accomplishments of Anglo-Saxons everywhere.

    Well now Gregory my lad, we’ve been at this game for a fair old while.

    Without fair dealings, a certain proportion of the native people of these islands will remain perpetually .. disgruntled.
    Here’s a pair of the last of us. After this, nothing. And why should we care?
    We are gone, and they are here. The world may as well burn in fire.

    Happy St Patrick’s Day, and all.

    • Thanks: Iris, SeekerofthePresence
  373. Iris says:
    @annamaria

    Mrs Markle’s real name is Rachel, and before her wedding, a spokesman for Westminster Abbey confirmed on behalf of the Church of England that, if they choose, Markle and Prince Harry will be able to marry within the church in an “interfaith” marriage, regardless of Mrs Markle’s “Jewish background”. Unwanted slip?

    So yes, it is possible she is Jewish. Not as important as her sister-in-law, though: the way she was treated by the disgusting British Zionist press is racist and appalling.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  374. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    Rachel Markle was introduced to Harry by a very Jewish Misha Nonoo: https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/a13970045/misha-nonoo-meghan-markle-prince-harry-matchmaker/

    Mrs. Markle has never behaved decently throughout her life. She is a vulgar and promiscuous gold-digger possessed by a delusion of grandeur. However, the “woke and progressive” Mrs. Markle demands from others to behave properly towards her. She is particularly touchy about her British title of dutchess (the good people of Sussex are terribly upset with the woke idiot). Among Markles’ biggest promoters are Clintons and Obamas (though Michelle has become more careful in the light of the ongoing Oprah-Markles obscenity).

    “Hillary Clinton is speaking out in support of Meghan Markle:” https://people.com/royals/hillary-clinton-meghan-markle-inexplicable-treatment/
    It is very hard to convince any sane person that Hillary Clinton is anti-zionist and anti-establishment. Meghan Markle is a tool of the destruction of western civilization, from being a disrespectful snake of a child to being a whining millionaire who uses an arsonist card of racism. She is a pestilence, as well as the billionaire Oprah.

    Those looking for justice in the UK should focus on the plight of Political prisoner Julian Assange.

    • Replies: @mike smith
  375. Iris says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    This is the paradox about the British. They are the most civilised and endearing people that can exist, but completely brainwashed as so to live in a parallel political reality, oblivious to the ruthless “elite” ruling over them and tearing the world apart.

    An acquaintance, an Eastern European lady with a sharp critical mind, who’d lived in Britain for two decades, summarised it best. At the beginning, she’d be stunned to always hear the exact same conventional opinion expressed by every random Brit she’d talked to about any controversial topic. She then realised that it was the power of the deeply-entrenched, century-old, state propaganda.

    Britain has invented propaganda, literally, to sell WW1. It has gone for too long, and is exerted with such overwhelming means that people have lost even the notion of common sense. The beauty of “liberal democracies”…

    Best friends are foodies; one just has to follow. They love eating in Whitechapel. I am sure you know: due to wealth and land concentration, there exists almost no real Londoner, except the East End’s Cockneys, those lucky enough to have been born within hearing-distance of Bow Church’s bells.
    But there also exists a very ancient Bangladeshi community in Whitechapel, dating back to the 17th Century, and arrived mostly from a province called Sylheti.
    Most of them came employed by the Royal Navy, often for their talents at preserving food for long months at sea.

    Their descendants are equally good cooks; their restaurants have long queues of customers (before Covid), often from the very wealthy financial district, the Square Mile nearby. Muslim Asian restaurants packed with native English who bring their own alcohol (in the blue plastic bags) ; nobody is offended and everybody is happy. The Brits are a great people in so many ways.

  376. @Malla

    I am a brown dude and even I am surprised by why would white countries would do this to themselves with ,mass migration of the sort we have been seeing from WW2. Why? Why destroy your advantage, why join us in the gutter.
    Maybe Christian-Leftist brain damage.

    All i can say re: my country (Britain) – Peter Mandelson, the so-called puppeteer behind the New Labour Party and an Communist Jew homosexual who constantly lobbied for the age of gay consent to be lowered, said that his government literally “sent out search parties” for more Pakistani Muslim migrants to come to Britain during their tenure. Says it all.

  377. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    Cavalli-sforza has genetic distances calculated. You weren’t listening. Pull the thread on your own.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  378. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Cavalli-sforza has genetic distances calculated.”

    Really, he has it for Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean, as outlined by Madison Grant? Because, that is what I had asked. Praytell, what category do YOU fall?

    Now, you said a tribe can become a race. But the French are not a tribe, nor are they a race. It would appear you are playing an intellectual shell game here.

    Ethnicity is and should be discussed as something that relates to one’s cultural and national identity, one’s belonging to a certain social and cultural way. If someone, for example, has a Western African ancestry, that ancestry is in their DNA, but it is not enough to define their ethnic group, nor does it determine their identity as a member of a human society and their allegiance to a particular human culture.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  379. @Anon

    You are correct, at first many Jews expressed excitement that a future heir to the throne might be Jewish solely because some of Britain’s Jewish families have adopted 3 of the surnames that crop up in Kate’s maternal lineage, but once the genealogists got to work, they found that every generation was getting married in a church, that they worked at unJewish occupations, and that, until somewhat recently, they lived in areas that were unlikely to have a Jewish presence.

    And Carole Middleton’s physique? I googled her image and her figure does not appear particularly Levantine to me. But even if there is room for a different perception, keep in mind that women in northern England tend to be more wide-hipped than the average European woman.

    Other than three surnames, which are indeed names indigenous to Britain–these are neither Yiddish nor Ladino names, in spite of their adoption by some Jewish families–I see zero evidence of Jewish ancestry in Kate’s lineage.

    I would hope this mistake would make people slower to take unverified claims on the internet at face value. One of the various failures of the educational system it that it does not inculcate in students the habit of verifying assertions that they read or hear.

  380. @annamaria

    I tried to find info re: Rachel Meghan Markle’s alleged Jewish ancestry on google. According the the Jerusalem Post, widespread reports in the popular media claimed that Meghan’s father was Jewish, but that this report was incorrect. The Post reports that her father is Irish (and her mother is “African American,” but may US blacks are mixed to some degree, and Meghan appears less than half black by descent). The Post also reports:

    Duncan Jeffery, Westminster Abbey’s head of communications, told JTA on Wednesday that the church never said that Markle was Jewish. It only confirmed that Markle could be married at the church despite a previous divorce, thanks to a rule that was instituted in 2002.
    “[Markle’s Jewishness] is merely conjecture on the part of other people,” Jeffery said.]
    A source with knowledge of the situation also confirmed that Markle is not Jewish.

    [Furthermore:]

    Tominey’s article is correct in explaining that there is no “legal barrier that keeps a royal from marrying someone from the Jewish, Buddhist or Muslim faith, or even an atheist.” Since 2015, even those formerly despised Catholics can marry into the royal family — however, a Roman Catholic still cannot become the queen of England.

    https://www.jpost.com/omg/is-meghan-markle-jewish-515324

    • Replies: @annamaria
  381. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    Corvinus, you don’t want to believe that evolution predicts racial differences. If you want to live in a fantasy that is your prerogative. Rational people will ignore you.

    Below is Sailer on Cavalli Sforza and genetic distance. I don’t care enough about the small distances between European whites, although it is there and measurable.

    It is even more measurable today than in the past with the advent of new genetic markers, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms, frequently called SNPs (pronounced “snips”), which are the most common type of genetic variation among people. Sforza had to rely more on gross measurements, sometimes including skull shape.

    http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Sailer,%20Steve.%20%22The%20Reality%20of%20Race.%22%20VDare,%20May%2025,%202000.pdf

    Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the “genetic distances” separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danish, and the Japanese 59 times greater. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish. (The genetic distance between Japanese and Bantus is even greater.)
    From these kind of tables, Cavalli-Sforza reached this general conclusion: “The most important
    difference in the human gene pool is clearly that between Africans and non-Africans …” As you
    can imagine, this finding could get him in a bit of hot water if the campus thought police ever
    found out about it. So, we should certainly forgive the charade he keeps up to fool the New York
    Times. But, we definitely don’t have to believe it.

    and you keep harping on race as if you head is buried in sand:

    What is a race? It is essentially a lineage. A racial group is merely an extremely extended family that inbreeds to some extent. Thus, race is a fundamental aspect of the human condition because we are all born into families. Burying our heads in the sand and refusing to think clearly about this bedrock fact of life only makes the inevitable problems caused by race harder to overcome.

    In one of our comment threads, I said that if you stopped immigration, eventually a new race would emerge.

    There is nothing I have said that is inconsistent, it is you that has a weak grip on things.

    The most important distance is that between Africans and Non-Africans. If that causes butt-hurt, it is not my problem, it is yours. The data is what it is.

    Do your own research. Stop being lazy and a crybaby.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  382. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Corvinus, you don’t want to believe that evolution predicts racial differences.”

    Nuance escapes you.

    https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/

    Again, Cavalli-Sforza “challenges the assumption that there are significant genetic differences between human races, and indeed, the idea that ‘race’ has any useful biological meaning at all”. In other words, he says, people cannot divided into racial groups based on DNA. “HBD realists” and advocates of white supremacy have argued that because genetic variations are associated with particular geographical locations, that is as good as providing a genetic basis for race, an argument that Cavalli-Sforza rejected.

    “If you want to live in a fantasy that is your prerogative. Rational people will ignore you.”

    Ah, the No True Scotsman Fallacy.

    “I don’t care enough about the small distances between European whites, although it is there and measurable.”

    You’re being evasive here. Now, really, has CS’s team measured the genetic distances for Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean, as outlined by Madison Grant? Because, that is what I had asked. Praytell, what category do YOU fall?

    “The most important distance is that between Africans and Non-Africans.”

    That would be one of several ways to look at it. But Madison Grant looked at it from the lens of Nordic-Alpine-Mediterranean. Why?

    “and you keep harping on race as if you head is buried in sand:”

    Let’s stay on topic, shall we? Now, you said a tribe can become a race. But the French are not a tribe, nor are they a race. It would appear you are playing an intellectual shell game here. Race and ethnicity are NOT the same. They are NOT interchangeable. Why do you seemingly insist otherwise?

    “I said that if you stopped immigration, eventually a new race would emerge.”

    That is patently false.

    • Replies: @mike smith
  383. annamaria says:
    @mike smith

    That was not about the purity of her Jewishness. It was about her Jewish wedding to a decent Jewish man; he was dumped as soon as his usefulness expired (same as Mr. Thomas Markle, the unfortunate father of the ingrate). Meghan likes making sanctimonious praying gestures during her video productions. She is indeed a praying mantis in a human form.
    And, of course, Meghan has reached the talmudic level of victimhood and shamelessness.
    Her mom Doria’s genetic makeup is not known.

    • Replies: @mike smith
    , @mike smith
  384. @Corvinus

    Cavalli plays this little game to appease the anti-racist establishment. On one hand, he vociferously denies that race exists. On the other hand, he publishes DNA research that proves the existence of “populations.” What he doesn’t talk about is the fact that his “populations” are exactly identical with the races of classical physical anthropology. If you want to know what Cavalli-Sforza is really saying, you need to read his scientific material directly, not what scientifically illiterate journalists say about it, and not he occasional politically correct diatribe which is just diversion to draw the attention of the witch hunters from his scientific writings.

    Also, to deny that a new race would emerge in the absence of immigration is to proclaim that evolution has stopped. There is absolutely no basis for this assumption. Indeed, computers have allowed researchers to crunch the numbers and to show that some races in different parts or the world (Utah Mormons, Nigerians, and some Asian group I have forgotten) are currently evolving away from one another at an unprecedented rate, probably because large populations allow more mutations.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  385. @annamaria

    No, the article is clearly about her alleged Jewish descent, which was initially reported by a variety of sloppy mainstream media sources.

  386. @annamaria

    On second thought, it occurs to me that you were not referring to the article, but to your comment that I replied to. In that case, you know better than I whether you were referring to her birth or her possible conversion prior to her marriage to her Jewish husband. Since you mentioned her true first name (Rachel), I thought you were pointing to both her birth name and her wedding to a Jew as evidence of her Jewish descent. I can see now you may have had conversion in mind, although her name (bestowed on her at birth) would not be relevant to that.

  387. @stevennonemaker88

    “Diversity is a terrible idea” is not at all false. Based on objective mathematical calculation, the more diverse the country, the greater its risk of revolution or civil war, to say nothing of less dangerous forms of inter-group conflict. In addition to the inherent problem of inter-group rivalry for control of the state, additional problems are introduced when the groups possess widely disparate average IQ’s, and personality differences may contribute to the problems as well. One group comes to resent the other(s) for contributing disproportionately to the burden of welfare dependency and crime, while the less intelligent group(s) scapegoats the more intelligent for all its deficiencies. And some individuals or even another rival group will encourage this animosity for their own benefit. There is no end to this civic distress in a culturally or racially diverse country.

  388. @Corvinus

    “Again, I ask, Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean? What is the “genetic distance” of each group from one another?” — I am curious about this myself (genuinely curious, unlike you). However, I am unaware that any geneticists have dared to measure these differences directly. Mostly they examine differences between national or regional populations regardless of their sub-racial mixture. However, a difference certainly exists (because traits such as pigmentation and skull shape have a genetic basis), but we also have enough data already to know that the differences will be quite modest.

  389. @Corvinus

    Putnam is a liberal, so, no, he does not oppose immigration or multi-culti. However, he was so distressed by his discovery of the adverse effect that diversity has on trust that he delayed submitting his discovery for publication for at least a year while he thought about how best to “spin” the discovery.

    There is a variety of subjects that have been totally taboo since the 1960s and to a less fanatical extent since WW2, about which, if they could be debated openly and honestly before the public, based on data and logic rather than ideology and whatever transient, fashionable “values” happen to currently prevail, there would be no difficulty in concluding that our nation SHOULD adopt policies very different from those now in place, although for ideological and emotional reasons, the society and especially its elites might still be unwilling to “go there.”

    “Post-war” civilization’s unwillingness to deal realistically with these matters dooms it to extinction. The list of these prohibited topics, all of them unpopular among the cultural left and some among the right as well, is longer than most people would expect, and some of them would be individually fatal. Collectively, they are catastrophic. I only hope it proves to be a slow catastrophe and not a fast one. In either case, there is no way we can turn it around at this late date. The survivors will just have to pick up the pieces someday. I hope “someday” does not turn out to be after the next ice age, which is how long it may take to make full recovery of our cognitive abilities after we hit rock bottom.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Corvinus
  390. geokat62 says:
    @mike smith

    However, he was so distressed by his discovery of the adverse effect that diversity has on trust that he delayed submitting his discovery for publication for at least a year while he thought about how best to “spin” the discovery.

    Spinning the truth was so difficult, it actually took him five years to publish it.

    Excerpt from, How to rebuild America great again:

    Robert Putnam, himself politically liberal, sat awkwardly on his findings for the decline of American social capital for five years before publishing. What were two of these verboten foundational reasons?

    The loss of racial homogeneity, and the removal of women from their households.

    https://missoulian.com/opinion/letters/how-to-rebuild-america-great-again/article_6c0c0cad-6226-5b39-a8fc-08aba63fd163.html

  391. @Malla

    I will respond to the second part of your comment first: “Why?” It certainly cannot be explained by “Christian-Leftists” since these two groups are usually hostile to one another. The minority of Leftists who do claim to be Christians usually reject core Christian teachings. Where the insanity comes from is the irreligious/anti-religious left. We have two left wing traditions in America. The original “classical liberal” tradition, and another, later left that become increasingly influential during the 20th century. This “Later Left” was primarily shaped by Marx, Freud, and Boas (the MFB syndrome). The “classical” left in America was mainly composed of and led by British Americans, but Ashkenazis, most of whom were late arrivals to these shores, played key roles in leading and popularizing the Later Left. By “marching through the institutions–higher education, journalism, publishing, entertainment, finance and banking, the Federal bureaucracy–and forming various lobbying groups, political donor groups, and other activist organizations, they reshaped the views of the educated classes, and eventually larger segments of the American public.

    As for being the “leader” of a multi-culti/multi-racial country, are you talking about being an elected head of state with limited powers and a limited term, or do have in mind something more like being dictator for life? In either case, there is no short term solution to the problems of such societies, but if you could form a small genetic elite that was dedicated to a combination of eugenics and high fertility, while encouraging female education and birth control among the general population, you might be able to forge an elite core that could gradually increase its numbers and ability until it became most of the country. Ideally, you would want it to reach a point where the new “caste” was so far superior to the general population that no one could plausibly entertain a myth of innate equality. I realize this is more easily said than done and would have to be implemented very, very discreetly if you were the head of state–unless you could persuade the public to accept such a group as very extended royal family. The British royal family has had a huge opportunity had they been wise enough to exploit it.

    One problem is that to understand these issues requires a degree of learning about population genetics, and sufficient intelligence to understand population genetics rather than just parrot some memorized facts without grasping their importance.

    Another problem is that the more intelligent women tend to prefer education and careers accompanied by delayed childbearing and small families. They would have to be persuaded that bearing offspring was the most socially beneficial function they could possibly perform, and they would have to care enough about the fate of the group to make some sacrifices for it. Ironically, advanced education and employment opportunities should be reserved for the less intelligent women.

    • Agree: Mefobills
  392. From the blog post: “So many of us are children of the British Empire that when we say “the Crown,” we mean the British crown.”

    Well, not just “children of the British Empire” but in America and some other countries many of us are literally descendants of British immigrants. In the little town where I attended grade school, I cannot recall a single classmate who did not have a British surname. Okay, technically my non-internet surname is of Norse origin, but it has been used for so long in Britain that it is regarded as English. I recall a Sunday School superintendent who had an Irish surname, but that is still one of the British Isles. Mostly, though, English and perhaps an occasional Scottish or Welsh surname. (One of my grandmothers had a maiden name of Welsh origin.) So, yes, “the Crown” means the British crown. It may be an “Unamerican” institution, but it is still a symbolic tie to our ancestral heritage. I also recall that one of my grade school teachers used to refer to England as “the mother country.” And in the American South, whence I originally hail, we still drink tea, although we prefer it over ice these days. It saddens me to watch the land of my ancestors turned into a refugee camp for the third world and my distant cousins become hopelessly mongrelized.

  393. Corvinus says:
    @mike smith

    “Cavalli plays this little game to appease the anti-racist establishment. On one hand, he vociferously denies that race exists. On the other hand, he publishes DNA research that proves the existence of “populations”.

    No game being played there, he’s simply clarifying his findings.

    “What he doesn’t talk about is the fact that his “populations” are exactly identical with the races of classical physical anthropology”.

    Or perhaps his research does not necessarily support this “fact”.

    “If you want to know what Cavalli-Sforza is really saying, you need to read his scientific material directly, not what scientifically illiterate journalists say about it, and not he occasional politically correct diatribe which is just diversion to draw the attention of the witch hunters from his scientific writings.”

    Maybe he is saying what is saying, and you simply want to believe he is really saying things “between the lines”. Get what I’m saying?

    “Also, to deny that a new race would emerge in the absence of immigration is to proclaim that evolution has stopped. There is absolutely no basis for this assumption.”

    Thanks for the strawman.

    “Indeed, computers have allowed researchers to crunch the numbers and to show that some races in different parts or the world (Utah Mormons, Nigerians, and some Asian group I have forgotten) are currently evolving away from one another at an unprecedented rate, probably because large populations allow more mutations”

    Those aren’t races. One is a religious group and the other is an ethnic group. But, I am interested in the sources you are citing that support your statement.

  394. Corvinus says:
    @mike smith

    The Putnam study consisted of a computer simulation of 20 million virtual “neighborhoods”, and its results SUGGESTS that the more “vibrant” a neighborhood, the less socially cohesion. Because “agent based modeling”!

    Except agent based modeling is uttely unable to offer causal explanations of social phenomena. A causal explanation must offer a complete account of all interactions leading to that social phenomenon. Please, by all means, provide the formal metrics to differentiate “bad partial causal explanations” from “good partial causal explanations”.

    Our identities, social relationships, and actual neighborhoods are extremely intricate and complex than any simulation can be generated. Diverse neighborhoods, believe it or not, actually exist, and thrive, in the real world–most people do not live in isolated neighborhoods of several hundred homes, and interpersonal relationships which involved a wide range of ethnic groups are phenomena that work at a far larger scale.

    “he delayed submitting his discovery for publication for at least a year while he thought about how best to “spin” the discovery.”

    Specific evidence that supports your assertion?

    ““Post-war” civilization’s unwillingness to deal realistically with these matters dooms it to extinction. The list of these prohibited topics, all of them unpopular among the cultural left and some among the right as well, is longer than most people would expect, and some of them would be individually fatal. Collectively, they are catastrophic.”

    That’s really more of an opinion on your part.

    “I am curious about this myself (genuinely curious, unlike you).”

    LOL, I am inquisitive here. I ask because Grant did not believe the “difference was modest”. Germans, Swedes, Irishmen, and Hungarians, at various points in American history, were deemed other than being able to embrace the culture and values of Americans by nativists (that being the ancestors of the ORIGINAL founders of our country). These Europeans were considered racial and ethnic pariahs. Ironic how some of those individual members of those persecuted groups today are acting in a similar fashion to nativists of the past. It reminds me of an 1880’s political cartoon.

    http://museum.msu.edu/exhibitions/virtual/immigrationandcaricature/7572-749.html

    Let us look at this “great replacement” in the United States from the perspective of WASP’s, the true Heritage Americans. They built America. How can we argue with that historical reality?

    Therefore it is tragic that WASP redoubts were subsequently overrun by foul-mouthed, parasitic louts from Eastern and Southern Europe in the late 1800 and early 1900’s. The 1924 Quota Act was a long-waited panacea to reign in such an odious creature, a wonderful piece of legislation that would make Hans F.K. Gunther proud. See, the simple fact of the matter, from the WASP point of view, is that the Eastern/Southern Europeans are infected with the “chosenite” virus. Stellar at patronizing, but not so much at moral consistency and applying to themselves the standards they demand of others.

    Face it, the Poles were especially notorious for being dirty, disease-ridden papists. The Italians bred like rabbits, lived in cramped quarters, and would not even bat an eyelash to bash in someone’s skull for a plug nickel. Yet, here we are with millions of them in the United States currently claiming they were historically embraced by their WASP counterparts because they were “white” and “European”, while simultaneously denying opportunities that their forefathers and foremothers received. Nostalgia has a funny way of distorting what truly went on in the past.

    So, were WASPs absolutely correct in connecting these particular groups with their own unique “proboscis” instinct? Is it not an absolute shame that the aforementioned legislation unfortunately failed miserably in its purpose and intention?

  395. geokat62 says:

    TL;DR Corvy…. “The ADL is right Diversity Is A Strength!” LOL

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS