The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
What Is 'Our Democracy?'
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Credit Image: © Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press

President Joe Biden’s midterm campaign message is that he is defending democracy from former president Donald Trump and his supporters. At Independence Hall, he says “MAGA forces” are a threat to the country. Among their sins is their promotion of “authoritarian leaders” and “[fanning] the flames of political violence that are threat to our personal rights [and] to the pursuit of justice.”

President Biden has overwhelming media support for this campaign, and it’s working; he and the Democrats are up in the polls and are almost sure to keep the Senate, if not the House. Even with the country arguably already in recession, the GOP is muffing it.

Still, one wonders what President Biden means when he says his opponents are “authoritarian.” What rights would he grant us? Do we still have free speech? At a recent summit, the President said that social media platforms must be “accountable for spreading hate and fueling violence.” We already know that the government, even under President Trump, has pressured media companies to ban people they don’t like. The Biden administration failed to launch a “Disinformation Panel” that would be run out the Department of Homeland Security, but it didn’t change its policies. It’s just less open about them. The federal government telling companies what speech they should ban is a perfect example of “authoritarianism.”

It’s not just about race. According to a lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, “dozens of federal officials across at least eleven federal agencies” tried to impose a “massive, sprawling federal ‘Censorship Enterprise,’” with the “intent and effect of pressuring social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech that federal officials disfavor.”

The FBI is now being told to manufacture cases. According to a report from the Washington Times , FBI leaders are pressuring agents to “create domestic terrorist cases and tag people as White supremacists to meet internal metrics.” “We have more people assigned to investigate White supremacists than [supremacists] we can actually find,” one agent said.

The article was based on comments from unnamed current and former FBI agents, so we have to be skeptical. Still, the FBI appears to have baited men into planning a ridiculous scheme to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. The FBI paid an undercover informant $54,000 over seven months for his efforts. The feds got convictions after a second trial, but some defendants were acquitted in an earlier trial. “[T]he Justice Department will not tolerate violent extremist plots,” said a former U.S. Attorney. It’s doubtful there would have even been a “plot” without the FBI.

Suspects in the Governor Whitmer “kidnapping plot.”
Suspects in the Governor Whitmer “kidnapping plot.”

The FBI operates in semi-secrecy; the administration openly tries to censor speech. At Mr. Biden’s “United We Stand” summit, the President once again cited Charlottesville’s “Unite The Right” rally as what motivated his campaign. He also recycled the old line from George W. Bush that America is “literally, not figuratively” based on an idea. He intoned: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. . . .” The White House official transcript inserted “women and” before “men” in brackets.

Thomas Jefferson, didn’t mean egalitarianism was self-evident or that the country was based on it. That is why he is being canceled. Administrators remove his name from schools. Charlottesville no longer celebrates his birthday; Monticello spits on him. The woke understand him better than President Biden does. The President can’t base American identity on one snippet from the Declaration while our rulers are expelling its author from the civic pantheon.

By modern standards, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, and every other Founder was a racist white nationalist. They believed they were building a nation by whites, for whites, rooted in the traditional liberties of Anglo-Saxons. One cannot understand the Declaration without understanding this.

Portrait of Thomas Jefferson by Gilbert Stuart, ca. 1805-1807. Credit: Album / quintlox
Portrait of Thomas Jefferson by Gilbert Stuart, ca. 1805-1807. Credit: Album / quintlox

If we really are to base a nation on the idea of absolute egalitarianism, we are basing it on what may be the stupidest, most self-evidently false idea in history. People are not equal. Races are not equal. Nations are not equal. The modern Left can’t even take refuge in the vague legal equality that the Founders alluded to. They have built a racial caste system that openly discriminates against whites and Asians, while those with official privilege hector whites for their privileges. Most whites, with good reason, are afraid to fight back.

But some will. Some will also say the unsayable. Races are different and their differences have consequences. Whites are being replaced in America and even on the mother continent. “White Privilege” is an excuse for elites to wield power over us. If saying so is hateful, then the truth is hateful. A war against “white supremacy” will never end because it is a war on biology. Even President Biden himself seems to endorse the “Great Replacement.” During the Obama Administration, then-Vice President Biden praised the way an “unrelenting” stream of immigration” will turn whites into a minority, which will somehow be a “source of our strength.”

President Biden recently told the Hispanic Congressional Caucus that continued immigration means “y’all are going to own the country, man.” He keeps bragging things we are supposed to pretend aren’t happening.

This fiscal year, a record of more than 2 million illegal immigrants were arrested at the southern border. The Border Patrol reports more than 8,000 “encounters” every day. This is indistinguishable from foreign conquest. Immigrants become voters, and if they are non-white — which most are — they have privileges over whites. This puts the colonists’ revolt over a tea tax in perspective.

A recent decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals means that Americans — or at least Texans — may be able to talk about this. The Court found that tech companies do not have the right to censor individual users. However, this may just be rearguard action. At the federal level, the White House is pushing for more censorship, and left-wing journalists have successfully pressured companies to deplatform or debank their enemies. Efforts by states won’t be enough, and with the GOP unlikely to retake Congress, free speech will be found only on alternative platforms that depend on alternative financial systems.

There is good news in the bad. Journalists and politicians like to hype up the “threat” so that the panic will never end. That means more people “canceled.” That means more people to support parallel institutions.

At the same time, America already has a real crime wave. You could hear police sirens during President Biden’s speech in Philadelphia, a city on pace to break the homicide record it set last year. Soros-supported DA Larry Kramer cruised to re-election in 2021; does no one care about the bloodletting? “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want,” said H.L. Mencken, “and they deserve to get it good and hard.”

Other places will get worse. Illinois is abolishing cash bail, so in already-chaotic Chicago, criminals will be quickly back on the streets. Chicago recently counted its 500th homicide of the year, especially impressive because of bad aim. Last weekend, from Friday to Sunday, criminals shot 45 people but killed only five.

If the Democrats keep Congress, we’ll probably see another push for gun control. A New York court recently ruled that citizens can sue gun companies. This essentially means that a company is responsible for whatever someone does with its product. No business can operate that way. Without guns, whites cannot defend themselves, but calling the police can be dangerous for a potential white victim.

In what kind of “democracy” are the people so stupid that the internet must be censored to protect them from “disinformation”? Even purely factual information must be hidden, lest people draw the wrong conclusions. If people are so stupid that they must be protected from facts, why should they vote? A young child can decide to change sex but a grown man mustn’t research political issues or medical care?

If you think that’s deeply sick, you are still sane. However, you better keep quiet, or you might find yourself approached by someone who thinks you should attack government officials. Don’t be too hard on him; informants are just doing their jobs.

In “Our Democracy,” white Americans have no collective political representation but bear collective responsibility for the failures of others. It is a theatrical regime that invents imaginary threats to justify more power. There are elections, but of what value are they when information is controlled and censored? Non-whites vote as blocs, so democracy can’t correct itself and becomes a racial head-count instead. Crime rates could triple in Baltimore, Memphis, and Chicago, but Democrats will still rule.

“Our democracy” is also “literally” based on an idea so stupid and false that most of American life is defined by trying to avoid its implications. We say we believe in equality so we can make enough money to move away from diversity. Unfortunately, there are fewer places to run and we can’t all go to Martha’s Vineyard. At some point, we must make a stand.

Gingerbread cottages in Oak Bluffs, Martha’s Vineyard. (Credit Image: © Ellen Creager/TNS via ZUMA Wire)
Gingerbread cottages in Oak Bluffs, Martha’s Vineyard. (Credit Image: © Ellen Creager/TNS via ZUMA Wire)

It’s difficult to see what “Our Democracy” has to do with our traditional liberties, our identity, or our heritage. The true flag of the regime is the intersectional banner that excludes whites — the very people who pay for it all. We are stateless drudges.

We are no longer part of “their democracy.” We subsidize it and get contempt in return; we naively play by their rules and are punished for our virtue. After the years of false starts with President Trump and MAGA, we should start talking seriously about white nationalism again. We want a state that can be a refuge for Western Civilization as our historic nations are destroyed. We want a lifeboat for our people to survive in in a world that scorns us.

Our system cultivates the worst. We offer an alternative. We must. This can’t continue.

While President Biden muses about using F-15s against political opponents, I can assure him we have no desire to “rise up” against him. We just want nothing to do with him, his allies, or his phony “Democracy.”

President Biden’s speech is part of the madness of a system that is no longer fit for purpose. All we should be talking about are the best ways to survive under it until, from the bottom up, we build the homeland our destiny demands. This will be peaceful — through construction, not demolition. It will begin with a secession of the mind — what Sam Dickson calls “abjuring the realm.” It will be the revolution in the hearts and the minds of the people who John Adams spoke about.

We are peaceful. We are builders, not destroyers. Joe Biden and his pets in America’s cities are doing a fine job of destruction on their own. If journalists, NGOs, and politicians want to know who is inciting racial violence, they can look in the mirror.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 18 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Prof Jason Brennan advocates Epistocracy as an improvement to Democracy.
    .
    .
    .

    Since the Races of Man vary not just in average intelligence but, as well, in empathy, altruism, individualism etc., probably some peoples would be better ruled by One-Party State/Fascism or what-not in lieu of Founding Fathers’ Classical Liberalism.
    .
    .
    .

    I still recall Sam Harris saying (something to the effect) Iraq, before instituting ‘pure’ Democracy, should have had “a period of a Benevolent Dictatorship” – in a debate with Cenk Uygur; ignoramus Cenk didn’t like it at all, could only spew out dogmas and platitudes…

  2. When the left uses the word combination “our democracy” the word “our” refers exclusively to themselves. Thus the right is a threat to “our” democracy. This makes perfect sense if you have a college degree.

  3. Franz says:

    At the federal level, the White House is pushing for more censorship

    Bingo! That’s Joe Biden’s Democracy.

  4. BuelahMan says:

    By modern standards, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, and every other Founder was a racist white nationalist.

    Uh, no.

    Those men (with possibly the exception of Hamilton) were not “nationalists”. Almost none of the founding fathers were nationalists. They were federalists who pushed for states rights.

    And almost NONE of them considered this country a “democracy” and actually despised democracies.

  5. SteveK9 says:

    If you would like to read a different take. Rolo Slavskiy on ‘Liberal Democracy’ US versus ‘Authoritarian’ Russia.

    The US is 100% oligarchy, Russia is partly an oligarchy and partly an autocracy (Putin).

    https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/liberal-democracy-begins-mobilization

    There is also, VI. The Great Russian Restoration: The Retreat of the Oligarchs

    https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/vi-the-great-russian-restoration

    The idea is that only an autocrat can save the people from an oligarchy.

    ‘Given a chance to vote in a national election, the people will support and elect a strong right-wing leader with a populist agenda. This is not speculation, this is simply the result of watching the last several centuries of political trends in the world. After the populist champion takes office, people, at the first opportunity, intend to transfer to him all the earthly power he needs to solve the problems that plague the country. If he succeeds in this, the people will bless him, wish him long years in office, and hope that he comes up with a reliable succession strategy. Few will work themselves up into a lather at the idea that the sacred democratic principle of separation of powers, term limits, and so on are being violated. If you doubt me, you simply weren’t paying attention to the whole “God-Emperor Trump” phenomenon and didn’t notice that die-hard Trumpers were waiting for their champion to declare himself dictator and go to war against the Deep State.

    Trump did indeed have his Rubicon moment and, as we all saw, he foundered in the current eventually selling out his own supporters and giving up any real chance to leave a lasting legacy.’

  6. G. Poulin says:

    Well, it’s not a democracy and it’s not ours. I don’t know what you would call our particular brand of totalitarianism. Bernie Sanders called it an oligarchy, which is close but not quite right since you don’t actually have to be wealthy to be part of the ruling class. “Kleptocracy” and “kakistocracy” are also close but fail to convey the totalitarian impulse that animates our current government. How about “demonocracy”?

  7. Hitmarck says:

    The fruits of being the good guys in two wars. =)

  8. anonymous[273] • Disclaimer says:

    Is this is a society worth saving? If you are a white male, I think not. Time to sit out the coming war, fellas, or time to get out of dodge city. Digital currency is coming, too, and soon conscription. You will have nothing, own nothing, and fight Shlomo’s proxy wars. Shlomo won’t have to worry about digital currency because it won’t apply to him.

  9. anonymous[247] • Disclaimer says:

    The United States let the jew cancer in, and the results were terminal.

  10. “Our Democracy” is merely a euphemism for the Globo-Pedo Empire, aka The Empire of Lies. The old dead YT’s who founded the country which was replaced by the above empire despised democracy anyway, as it ultimately boils down to 200,000,000 wolves and a 50,000,000 sheep voting on what’s for dinner. That’s why the borders have been wide open since 1965 and the Great Replacement (openly celebrated by the usual suspects when not denying it) is well along the way. As noted above the empire is not anything resembling a democracy anyway. The free-shit army votes only one way at the end of the day irrespective of retarded DR3 arguments made by “conservatives” (who could not even conserve the ladies’ room). The empire is an utterly depraved plutocracy masquerading as a democracy.

    Voat moar harder, zeks!

  11. Are those polls real? Of course they aren’t. They’re a cover for an another attempt to rig the elections.

  12. Wehnu says:

    While I don’t dobt that many of the Founders were pro-“white”, the question is what was their definition of “white”?

    Did they use “white” as in “European”? Woud they have included southern Europeans as “white”?

    I recall back in the 90’s reading that Benjamin Franklin considered only english/Germans/Scandinavians as “white”.

  13. onebornfree says: • Website

    G.H.: “By modern standards, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, and every other Founder was a racist white nationalist. ”

    True.

    From Verse 3 of my song: “New Revolution”:

    “If Jefferson was alive here today
    He’d be locked up in prison wasting away
    If Jefferson was alive here today
    He’d be locked up for life in Guantanamo Bay…”

    Regards, onebornfreeatyahoo

  14. Alrenous says: • Website

    Voters can rule approximately the same way cats can play tennis.

    Every time the voter’s vote doesn’t matter, they need an application of rhetoric to assure them that it does. Hence “our” democracy, implying that it is, in some ineffable way, the voters’.

    Although the specific policy of a democracy is never what the voters want, remarkably, it reflects the intent of the concrete policies extremely well. E.g. voters want socialism, which will make them poor and/or dead. The democracy provides crime, which makes them poor and/or dead, but without interrupting the smartphone supply, see? The democracy reads the goal and transmutes the means such that the actual demand is met. Astonishing.

    In particular, voters want to complain that nothing is their fault. Maximize irresponsibility. As such, it’s important that the democracy is never seen to be pandering to voter desires. They want to be made poor and/or dead, but they don’t want even a hint of the possibility of being blamed. The more oppressive and tyrannical, the better. Further: Nietzsche.

    As a bonus, this provides an outlet for the fact all political formulae are perverse. If the idea is the consent of the governed, you must be a real chad if you govern so as to maximize dissent.
    Everything working as intended.

    • Replies: @Derer
  15. Derer says:
    @Alrenous

    A democracy is and remain to be allusive metaphysical phenomena. Long time ago, high profile illiterate fools applied working of an individual democracy to a group of people – a complete idiocy.
    Al the conflicts are stemming from a democracy, being exclusively an individual concept, being considered for a larger group. My democratic right to suntan nude on my backyard interferes with my neighbor’s wife democracy to chu my ding. Russian democratic right to defend their tribe in Ukraine interferes with American practice of narcissism.

    Voting for some fools to represent me in Washington is never a democracy.

  16. “Our democracy” is an imagined paradise where speech is monitored and approved by government appointed moderators, entertainment, clothing, food, housing, medical care and clothing are free and work of any description is entirely voluntary.

  17. We are peaceful. We are builders, not destroyers. Joe Biden and his pets in America’s cities are doing a fine job of destruction on their own. If journalists, NGOs, and politicians want to know who is inciting racial violence, they can look in the mirror.

    I say:

    I respectfully suggest that a big old heaping mountain of SCHUMPETERIAN CREATIVE DESTRUCTION is exactly what young and old White Core Americans should be trying for.

    Asset Bubble Implosions and Debt Repudiations must be used to politically decapitate the evil and demonic JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    The “controlled democracy” that the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire has installed is just ANTI-WHITE TOTALITARIANISM(AWT).

    The young people in European Christian nations can destroy so-called “controlled democracy” by utilizing debt repudiation as a retaliatory device.

    ODIOUS DEBT is a legal concept that young people in European Christian nations should employ to restore liberty and free speech to their nations.

    If a totalitarian government runs into a debt crisis it is less likely to be able to keep the lid on calls for free speech and liberty.

    This applies much more so to Anglo-Saxon nations than perhaps to Turkey or China or Russia.

    Young people in Anglo-Saxon nations should be planning on repudiating all government debt as a means to restore free speech and liberty.

    As the next phase of the global financial implosion hits, it will be important for young people to make it clear that they will walk away from all debts incurred by their totalitarian governments.

    The student loan debt of a trillion and a half or so dollars in the USA is small potatoes, the big government debt at all levels of government and the unfunded liabilities of government is over a hundred trillion dollars and growing fast.

    Young people should be demanding a return to normalized interest rates from the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. The normal federal funds rate of 6 percent would implode the asset bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate. Young people will benefit from a collapse in asset prices.

    Two issues driving politics in European Christian nations:

    DEBT — MONETARY POLICY

    DEMOGRAPHICS — MASS IMMIGRATION POLICY

    • Replies: @Fred Herrington
  18. @Charles Pewitt

    You need to get your conspiracy theories straight, bro. You talk about Anglo-Saxon nations right after conflating WASPs and Jews. You are aware what the acronym WASP stands for, no? That being said, I’m not discounting your suggestion. It’s just that your messaging is a little schizo.
    So how exactly would the citizens of Anglo-Saxon or European Christian (what do you mean by that?) nations repudiate this debt? You give the example of student loan debt – ok, yeah you just don’t pay. I get that. And that would work for unsecured consumer debt as well. I’m on board. But how do you repudiate the “big government” debt, as you call it? How does one, as an individual, repudiate the national debt effectively?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?