The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
The Lost Opportunity of the 1990s
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Matt Walsh is an effective conservative activist. His documentary What Is a Woman? is a clever look at the absurd impulses of transgenderism. He’s even a best-selling children’s author, but he has a mixed record on race.

His tweet above is wrong. The 1990s were hardly a time when Americans didn’t talk about race. Many readers of this site can probably remember incidents from the 1990s that woke them up on race, such as:

Coverage from the Los Angeles riots after the not guilty acquittal of policemen on trial in beating of Rodney King. In total, 55 people were killed during the riots, more than 2,000 people were injured, and more than 11,000 were arrested and \\$1 billion in property damage. (Credit Image: © Gene Blevins/ZUMA Wire)
Coverage from the Los Angeles riots after the not guilty acquittal of policemen on trial in beating of Rodney King. In total, 55 people were killed during the riots, more than 2,000 people were injured, and more than 11,000 were arrested and \$1 billion in property damage. (Credit Image: © Gene Blevins/ZUMA Wire)

The 1990s were when the “dream” of a post-racial society ended. The O.J. Simpson case showed that blacks would probably always put race before rule of law.

However, Mr. Walsh does have a point, because in the 1990s America still had a mainstream culture. The country was still 79 percent white in 1990. This meant people who pushed anti-white policies had to hide their aims. They couldn’t openly call for Critical Race Theory in public schools, reparations, or deposing the American flag without being laughed at.

What the 1990s may have really been was the last chance to stop multiculturalism. After the American victory in the Cold War, there was confusion about what America was supposed to stand for. “Without the Cold War, what’s the point of being an American?” asked one of John Updike’s characters. Patrick Buchanan may have been the only mainstream political figure who offered a real answer. “The greatest vacuum in American politics is to the right of Ronald Reagan,” he said in 1987, near the end of President Reagan’s second term. He launched two populist challenges to George H.W. Bush, promoting immigration control, English as the official language, noninterventionism, opposition to free trade, and ending affirmative action.

Democracy is not a system that rewards those who tell the truth. Many people thought Mr. Buchanan sounded mean. When he pledged to CPAC in 1992 to “root out the whole rotten infrastructure of reverse discrimination, root and branch,” the Hartford Courant complained:

There is such a thing as principled opposition to affirmative action. A great need in this country is for a dispassionate discussion of the concept — whether it is achieving its purpose or rending the social fabric so as to be destructive in effect.

But Mr. Buchanan, when he stirs the pot of fear and resentment, doesn’t contribute positively to that dialogue. He sounds somewhat like David Duke, who stands outside the margin of political respectability.

In 1991, David Duke was elected to the Louisiana legislature. The paleoconservative intellectual movement — with writers such as Murray Rothbard, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and Thomas Fleming — challenged Conservatism Inc. The “Republican Revolution” in 1994 was a real opportunity to check liberalism and the growth of federal power.

Despite President Ronald Reagan’s 1996 amnesty for illegal immigrants — which leftist historians will probably call the most important thing he ever did — there was also still a chance to stop mass immigration. In 1994, California voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 187, to end public education and benefits for illegal immigrants — only to see its provisions gutted by judges.

Likewise in 1994, Barbara Jordan — the first black woman to give the keynote address at a Democratic National Convention — headed a congressional commission on immigration that proposed policies well to the right of what President Donald Trump accomplished in office. The year before, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) said “no sane country” would allow birthright citizenship.

Shakespeare wrote in Julius Caesar, “There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.”

Conservatives didn’t act. California Governor Gray Davis, a Democrat, refused to appeal the ruling against Proposition 187. He ended his term in disgrace after a recall, but any future Aztlán should honor him as a founding father. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger didn’t stop the transformation of California and could be the state’s last Republican governor. Newt Gingrich and his supposedly “revolutionary” Republican Congress shied away from a federal ban on racial discrimination against whites and Asians.

The 1990s also had real debates on immigration and race that are now impossible.

In 1995, Peter Brimelow wrote Alien Nation: Common Sense About America’s Immigration Disaster. Thomas Jackson wrote in review:

With the appearance of this book, the public debate about immigration has finally approached the full dimensions that taboos have denied it. After years of letting themselves be silenced by anyone willing to equate immigration control with “racism,” a prominent advocate of border controls has at last called the other side’s bluff. Of course race is an issue, explains Mr. Brimelow, and whites have every right to oppose dispossession by nonwhites.

Republicans did not act. The border stayed open, even after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Today, America is on the brink of becoming a minority-majority country, and it is a real question whether we can call it a “nation” at all.

In 1994, Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray wrote The Bell Curve, which examined the importance of IQ and touched on race. “Touched on,” because it was not a book about race, but race and IQ dominated the widespread coverage. There would be no such debate today.

There were other serious books on race, IQ, and ethnicity:

Daniel Seligman, A Question of Intelligence, Birch Lane Press, 1992

Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions, Carroll & Graf, 1992

Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, Transaction Publishers, 1995

Michael Levin, Why Race Matters, Praeger Publishers, 1997

Arthur Jensen, The g Factor, Praeger Publishers, 1998

Tatu Vanhanen, Ethnic Conflicts Explained by Ethnic Nepotism, JAI Press, 1999

We could also add books just before and after the 1990s.

Mark Snyderman & Stanley Rothman, The IQ Controversy, Transaction Publishers, 1988

Richard Lynn, Eugenics: A Reassessment, Praeger Publishers, 2001

These and other books did not open the door for more discussion. They seemed to scare our rulers into shutting down debate. MSNBC expelled Pat Buchanan because network president Phil Griffin said “the ideas he put forth aren’t really appropriate for national dialogue, much less the dialogue on MSNBC.”

Free speech has been further crushed since Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. It is because these issues are important that our rulers didn’t want them discussed, and Conservatism Inc. quietly went along. The same people still run the conservative movement, which explains why its “movement” is always backwards.

Writing about The Bell Curve’s impact, Christopher Brand wrote:

In 2000, journalists Peter Brimelow and Steve Sailer had noted on their VDARE.com web page that discussion of IQ and race had actually become more difficult as the 1990s progressed. Daniel Seligman, who had written a very readable little volume on the IQ debate in 1992 called A Question of Intelligence, also thought the atmosphere for discussing IQ and race had deteriorated. In his view, the liberal-left had shouted down all serious talk of IQ and had thereby “won” the argument. Ron Unz, who has campaigned to eliminate “bilingual education,” thought America’s intellectual elite had become significantly more frightened to talk about IQ since 1994.

Matt Walsh is right that to say that during the 1990s Americans still had a culture and that we didn’t have to hear about race all the time. However, that implied unity required a white supermajority, which is probably gone forever. We had the “woke” then as we do now; they just don’t have to hide behind “colorblind” rhetoric anymore. Even in the 1960s, Martin Luther King didn’t believe in “colorblindness” any more than in his marriage vows.

Conservatives should be asking why Republicans didn’t end all this nonsense when they could have. They were foolish and cowardly. Now, it’s not clear that America can — or should — be saved. The political and demographic threats are worse than ever. Our advantage is that fewer have any illusions about what is at stake. Let’s hope Mr. Walsh and others catch up.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 253 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rich says:

    When HW Bush was president the republican were going to pass an anti-affirmative action bill but a former college football star put of Oklahoma that they recruited to show how they weren’t “racist” talked them put of it. He convinced them that by keeping an, eventually blacks would vote repub. That worked out well.

    The transformation of the country into a Latin American country all comes down to wages. People can’t be disgustingly wealthy without a grossly underpaid peasant class. If you can’t grow it, import it.

  2. The 1990s were a bad time. I remember them. And not fondly.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  3. Jungle Fever became mainstream in the 1990s. Spike Lee made a movie of that name and madonna made a public spectacle of herself as sex doll for the NBA. Rap went totally mainstream, and classic Rock began to die or survived in ever wimpifying form.

    Clinton de-regulated Wall Street and locked up record number of black males, bringing crime way down and setting off gentrification of urban areas.

    It was also when Jewish boomers gained dominant power over the US, and Wasps became cuck-pussies of Jews.

    It was also when Big Business made a decisive move to the Democrats who accepted free trade and pro-business policies.

    Also, following the end of the Cold War, the Classic Left died and what emerged as the new consciousness centered around idolatry of homos who were increasingly sanctified.

    GOP rejected Buchanan, and so did most American conservatives who went with Limbaugh-ist yahooism.

    The missed chance was addressing the fact that Jews were becoming the new masters of the US.

    Despite President Ronald Reagan’s 1996 amnesty for illegal immigrants

    That was 1986. I wonder if he cut a deal. He would be spared Iran-Contra if he agreed to the amnesty. Strange timing.

  4. @Twin Ruler

    1980s were the last great decade.

  5. @Priss Factor

    Indeed, Rock music ceased being as mainstream in the 1990s. Perhaps concomitantly with the death of (the highly overrated) Kurt Cobain.

    • Agree: omegabooks
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @ebear
  6. AceDeuce says:

    When I read the Walsh quote, my blood boiled. Thank God Hood walked me off the ledge. The past few years haven’t been a breakdown in race relations, they’ve been a wake up call to zombified, brainwashed White neutered capons who have been waddling around for 30-40 years “not seeing color”. LOL.

    Race relations didn’t change in the last 50 years. Whites did. Negroes hated you then and they still do. No change at all. 50 years ago, they at least had some little bit of healthy fear and a bit of respect for Whites. Not no mo’.

    Whites were the ones who changed (ran and hid with their fingers in their ears “LA LA LA LA LA I can’t hear you!”) Brainwashed and guilt tripped. In deep denial. Let the Rooftop Koreans take care of it if things get too bad.

    Don’t believe me? How about nigro “comic” Chris Rock, AKA “Slappy” (LOL) Here’s his take:

    When we talk about race relations in America or racial progress, it’s all nonsense. There are no race relations. White people were crazy. Now they’re not as crazy. To say that black people have made progress would be to say they deserve what happened to them before…

    So, to say Obama is progress is saying that he’s the first black person that is qualified to be president.

    That’s not black progress. That’s white progress. There’s been black people qualified to be president for hundreds of years.”

    SNIP

    ” The question is, you know, my kids are smart, educated, beautiful, polite children. There have been smart, educated, beautiful, polite black children for hundreds of years. The advantage that my children have is that my children are encountering the nicest white people that America has ever produced. Let’s hope America keeps producing nicer white people.”

    “White people are nicer” and “White people are less crazy” is just propaganda NigSpeak for “White people used to stand up for themselves and didn’t take any schitt, and when nigros pulled any bad stuff, as they always do, they were put in check right away.”

    When an innocent woman was sexually assaulted in 1950s Mississippi by a fat nigro teenager, her “crazy/ not so nice” husband took care of business. Now, some White woman victim probably would have a cuckWhite husband who wouldn’t say or do anything about it, and the cuck White 2022 legal system would probably let the rapey-minded perv nigro off–and according to Slappy Rock, that’s an improvement?

    Rock also said: “There’s been black people qualified to be president for hundreds of years.”

    My ass. I can’t name one fking black that I’d vote for for dogcatcher of East Podunk, Arkansas.

    In the 1980s, not to mention earlier, Obama wouldn’t have gotten 5% of the White vote. There were grownups back then who made up the electorate.

    Thirty years later, Obama was president. (Twice-although I think 2012 was stolen.) According to Slappy Rock, that’s an improvement.

    The hell it is.

  7. Emma S. says:

    Matt Walsh, a mainstream conservative who is on the Daily Wire cannot speak about race in an honest way. He slips in some truths such as talking about White people being under an attack and the double standards in “Cultural Appropriation”.


    If he said aloud something like “racial diversity has negative effects in society and is undesirable or I want my children to marry a fellow White person so they can resemble me”, he would no longer be welcome in polite society.
    That being said, he is certainly much better than conservatives like Ben Shapiro.


    I think some of the most race-blind people in the country are conservatives. If they see a Black person attacking White people, they blame Democrats for it. It is true the left harbors up animosity towards Europeans but that doesn’t mean that Black people are independent from their hatred and animus towards White people and that we should live together. A lot of Conservatives/Republicans are opposed to Critical Race theory because they think the Leftists are dividing Americans (White and Black) based on race and preventing us from blending in together into one, mixed brown race.

    https://me.me/i/democrats-greatest-fear-make-ameroga-great-again-the-progressive-demonrats-68d560dbbdb343d19b7ae827dd408bcb
    https://meme-generator.com/mememe/democrats-greatest-fear-2/

    I wish less White people would be scared of the word “racist”. It is like this word has paralyzed them since racism is the greatest sin for many if not most people. Leftists also call people who are opposed to non-White immigration or race mixing, “fascists” or “Nazi” despite the fact that people who fought against the Nazis and Fascists had the exact same view. I saw many people on Twitter calling Viktor Orban a “fascist Nazi” for his statement on race-mixing. I guess they can’t fathom in their brains that most people outside the West think the exact same thing. Most parents want and expect their children to date, marry and procreate within their own ethnic group. It is only White people who are expected to embrace it gleefully while singing a song of national, ethnic and racial annihilation.

  8. @AceDeuce

    I don’t know why Obama is such a bogey man for you. He didn’t stoke BLM riots, like the Democrats after him did. He was certainly no worse than Bush and Biden. Also no less qualified. His greatest fault was not being able or willing to curb the foreign office interventionists and Russia hawks sufficiently. But he stood up against Netanyahu on Iran. Trump botched that one.

  9. @AceDeuce

    A lot of good points. I’d add that the nationwide sweep of “Shall Issue” concealed carry regimes which started in 1987 with Florida probably made most of its numerical progress in the 1990s, watch this animated gif and perhaps to its current end with the wave of green coded Constitutional Carry, no license required covers most of the landmass and half the states, 2016 would seem to be around when it became a wave.

    One reason I keep bringing this up is that it and gun control in general is the one major defeat our ruling trash have suffered; for the 1990s see the backlash to the “assault weapons” ban (and there’s lots more that went down, ask if you want more of the story). “Conservatives” were also notably MIA in it, of course it was a non-issue for the NYC oriented ones.

    For this article it fits into the black crime situation you discuss and for example the “Nixon in China” actions taken by Democrats after Clinton became President. Democrats aren’t going to be repeating that for the foreseeable future although there’s some backlash happening, mostly I think in purging a few Soros prosecutors. Plus of course continued fleeing big Blue crime ridden cities, which in an ancient pattern are also recognized as bad places when plagues hit.

    Thirty years later, Obama was president. (Twice-although I think 2012 was stolen.)

    Yeah, I’ve been rethinking the 2012 election, less and less it seems probable after four years of Obama, although Romney was really about the worst possible candidate they could run, including unable to credibly criticize Obamacare.

    • Thanks: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Robert Bruce
    , @TTSSYF
  10. @Emma S.

    I wish less White people would be scared of the word “racist”. It is like this word has paralyzed them since racism is the greatest sin for many if not most people.

    To make a good analysis of this you’d have to graph how much, and for various fields the accusation could be a job and career ender or damager long before modern woke canceling. The JQ was also of course out of bounds as of the 1980s, but simply arguing heatedly with a Jew in academia wasn’t, even addressing the issue of gun control in the context of Jews and the Holocaust (the latter which at minimum they believed in). Good times to sharpen your debating skills….

    • Replies: @Jacobite2
  11. @Occasional lurker

    I don’t know why Obama is such a bogey man for you.

    I can remember people, whites of course, thinking, “now that we’ve elected a black president we can cap all this racial stuff.”

    Anyone who’d researched Obama’s background knew that was garbage, and he turned out to be an unparalleled racial arsonist. And you seem to forget BLM started on his watch; his actions in general helped set us up for the 2020 BLM summer of love. I’d also seriously wonder if he had nothing to with “stoking” those BLM (and Antifa) riots. To switch domains, Obama was important like “Biden” has been in imposing extreme energy poverty on the nation which also directly impacts our farmers ability to grow food economically.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  12. The 1990’s were a time of sensationalist mud slinging, which created the foundation for the ‘deplorable’ smear used by Hillary Clinton in 2016.

    In 1991, a documentary was released called “Blood in the Face”. It gathered all the most ugly tropes about the neo-Nazi and KKK LARPers and served them up as degenerate art. On the talk shows, the dust-up between Geraldo Rivera and the skinheads became legend.

    The bogeyman of the modern White supremacist, mostly a fictitious monster created by 90’s Hollywood, gave rise to its very real opposite: the angry, campus-educated, ‘Antifa’ social justice warrior, and their fanatical ‘GoodWhite’ backers.

  13. @Vergissmeinnicht

    How can anyone go for a musical genre called ‘grunge’? It sounds yucky.

    • Replies: @Feryl
  14. Great article, as always.

    I think Buchanan was tolerated in the mainstream because he was so retrograde on gays and social issues. He polarized. He was exhibit A of the left for the bad old days. They would wheel out this Archie bunker clone railing against sodomites and buggery, which was off putting to the younger generation. Oh, and inadvertently they linked those issues to opposition to affirmative action and immigration in the public mind.

    Buchanan learned from the progressive alt right in the 2000s and jettisoned the retrograde talk about homos and religious issues and focused in on the issues of race and immigration, and who was behind the middle eastern wars. And he was promptly ejected from the mainstream media!

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Anon
  15. @Rich

    The transformation of the country into a Latin American country all comes down to wages.

    The United States hasn’t become a Latin American country. It’s become the biggest shtetl on earth, and it’s run by the same sordid, smelly mob that runs other shtetls.

    In a critical sense, wages are the least of this country’s problems, in that it hardly matters how much money a slave is paid. Whatever he gets, he’s still a slave.

    • Agree: Druid55, Robert Dolan, Ace
  16. Jacobite2 says: • Website
    @That Would Be Telling

    What makes me believe that the white America era ended with VE Day is the memory that “The Lone Eagle” and “The Most Admired Man in America” (Charles Lindbergh) was made a pariah within one week by the Jewish MSM and radio (both NBC and CBS Jewish-owned) for pointing out that Jews in the US and OS were one of only two groups (Brits being the other) in the US trying to get the US involved in the European War. Americans were opposed to US involvement by 85-90%. Interesting fact: his Iowa speech was delivered on 9/11/41. Coincidence?
    It’s also interesting that Americans view all of US history from the viewpoint of the Nation of Israel.
    They believe that the Immigration Act of 1924 was an anti-Semitic action. Well, it definitely was, but was fully justified by the rampant Jewish/Leftist/Socialist agitation against pretty much everything American. ACLU (anti-Christian), NAACP (anti-white), CPUSA (anti-American) being only the high-points. The point is that the accusation of anti-Semitism alone is automatically and reflexively considered intolerable. The Nazis are another example: of course Jews and Leftists (to the extent that there’s any difference) saw the Nazis as their enemy in 1933 (in fact, the Nation of Israel declared war on Germany in numerous newspaper ads in 1933). But why would any Euro-American have any problem with the Nazis? Germany had been under violent attack by Jews/KPD/Spartakus League since 1918 — 15 years by 1933. If the Weimar Government had stamped out the insurrection, the Nazis would never have become the largest party in the Reichstag. But Americans sympathize with the Jews? Not at the time. Starting right after September 1st, 1939, Americans were overwhelmingly opposed to accepting any refugees from Europe. Just as Lincoln constantly justified the War Between the States as necessary to preserve the Union and had offered to allow slavery if the Southern States wouldn’t secede, FDR made the War in Europe our first priority (even though we were supposedly fighting the Japanese because of the Pearl Harbor attack). This by the fantastical claim the the Nazis were coming across the Atlantic and up through South America to attack the US. You know, just like eastern Ukraine is the first domino to fall in Europe. As the operations officer for a 15th USAAF group in Italy, my father was aware of Jewish pressure to bomb the camps at Osweicim, Poland. In fact the 15th did bomb synthetic oil and rubber refineries there on 18 and 26 Dec 1944. But the USAAF command staunchly rejected any proposed actions not associated with fighting and defeating the Germans. Didn’t they understand what they were fighting for? Americans today seem to see the entire purpose of WW II as saving the Jews of Europe. Of course, it was also necessary to save the Soviet Union!

    • Thanks: Druid55, Ace
    • Replies: @werpor
  17. Rich says:
    @Happy Tapir

    The human race was anti-homosexual up until the 21st century and it is only accepted by the degenerate populations in the West. A concerted propaganda campaign in the West has convinced many weak minded younger people and wealthy, degenerate middle aged folks to accept the behavior. In 2012 Obama ran for reelection claiming to be opposed to homosexual marriage. 2012. In 2008 the liberal state of California voted against legalizing homosexual marriage. A degenerate judge ruled the constitutionally legal law illegal based on a fantasy interpretation of the 14th Amendment. It wasn’t homosexuality that lost the election for Buchanan or Bush. Clinton was only elected because Perot took 19% in 92. And Clinton was opposed to homosexual marriage too.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
    , @Anon
  18. LBJ’s 1965 Immigration Act and Reagan’s 1986 Amnesty for Illegal Alien Invaders and George HW Bush’s 1990 Immigration Act were and are direct attacks on the European Christian ancestral core of the USA and the historic American nation and White Core America.

    George HW Bush and the US Congress passed a law in 1990 to attack and undercut American STEM workers by flooding the USA with foreigners on work visas. The 1990 immigration law pushed by George HW Bush and the US Congress was designed to lower wages for American workers and it was designed to destroy cultural cohesion in the USA.

    Treasonous globalizer rat George HW Bush was eager to attack American workers by flooding the USA with foreigners. The H-1B visa was one of the methods and weapons that dirtbag rat George HW Bush used to viciously attack and undercut American workers.

    Trump has now joined with the dead globalizer scumbag, George HW Bush, in his attacks on American STEM workers by calling for massive increases in guest worker foreigners and visa worker foreigners and other scams to attack American workers.

    Economic Immigration Dilemma Blog:

    When the H-1B visa was created in 1990, the 1952 requirement that the visa was temporary was removed. H-1B became a dual-intent visa which allowed the foreign worker to remain in the U.S. while applying for permanent residency (green card). Politicians and pundits said that H-1B was temporary their intent to make it a permanent visa was very clear.

    https://immigration-weaver.blogspot.com/p/a-legislative-history-of-h-1b-and-other.html

    • Replies: @anonymouseperson
  19. Let’s be honest — laugh cliche’ as that comment is.

    Being pro-white does not make you conservative. First simple test. Affirmative has never benfitted blacks as much as it has wites. it never has. And yet whites whine about affirmative action as though its the bane of white existence. Blacks are not even 20% of the affirmaticve action recipients. And when spread out across the country the few that are, if you could even locate them are no in the main of national decision making.

    So the complaint about affirmative action while a convenient escape for rousing whites to action is rather a tawdry ploy of limited truth. Great for getting out the vote or stirring up whites to beat back the black hordes moving into their neighborhoods, such as they are — they don’t exist – it’s ereally false and thpose they use it as soime kind of truth are engaged in faslsehood.

    Engaging in such conduct is hardly a monicker of conservative ethos. And yet we do. The use of crime stats does describe some 48 million people. Never has and in all liklihood never will. It’s like the jumping sicks we use is probabilities to what is a small number of blacks in which similar conditions would produce similar outcoes egardless of color.

    Dr Sowell, would certainly have qualified for tne executive office by anyone’s standard, but herte\s the trick, even someone as dumb as myself, low IQ, low income, etc. etc as I was reminded today, understands the the Constitution doesn’t really set a standard and George Washington, the second president is hardly an effectual model — he was an “upper class” elite. Who was eager to squash tax revolts, because representatives voted for the matter and therefore —

    We have manufactured the whop qualifies and we change the qualificatios as oftyen as we change executives, save for one area: white and male. Now maleness makes some sense bcause with ma.eness comes a whole world of experience — waraking and war fighting to name a key right of passage. But skin color . . . my guess is that General Thomas-Alexandre Dumas Davy de la Pailleteri would have kicked Gen Washingn’s tail ten times over. And yet had the general done so on behalf of the colonists, he would not have been selected for the office as the executive.

    (note: I am a conservative and blacks don’t give me brownie points for stating some simple truths inteir stead)

    Using christianity as some kind of unique white created faith virtuous for the mere being of whites in it — is s such deep lie as to make Satan a partner in its manifestation.

    Sure if one is going to laser on those blacks engaged in dysfunctional issues then certainly one conveniently creates a self fulfilling world view. Now if in fact even 1/4 of the black population were as many of my so called conservatves — — easily willing to embrace lies to make their point — were as oft highlighted in statistics, I might agree. But point o fact — they are not. So excuse for bowing out of the mantra. Now clearly when it comes to politics there is not mquestion that blacks lean democratic — my side of the aisle blew black support by embacing all things southern including its views on blacks — given the stakes of tribalism —

    [MORE]

    established before any black could walk across the sidewalk muchless read, it seems peculair that anyone should be shocked by this. The entire history of politics in the US has been without question a work around involving color and that largely how to keep blacks out iof it. Good grief, even the Japanese got into the acty 1990 and the chinese just a few years with laundry commercial . . . the whites from the Us have exported white economic and politics as stapel rotuine. It’s a losy lessen, and one blacks have more than any other crossed the line to ignore, but eventually even the mot conservative black if he has to deal with whits long enough will come to understand with a sigh, a shout, or a moan of disappointment whites are about whites regardless of truth or political party. And the only way around that is to be a black who swallows himself whole so that he himself is not devoutred by white sensitivy regarding just how pervasive and entrenched whiteness has been ingrained in every molcule that biounces, drifts, or shoots across the US lanscape of mind and material. Smart black conservatives don’t simply say a simple truth affrimative actin is a white program for white women, omosexuals and light brown — hispanics of varying shades.

    I can imagine the stunned look on the white faces in CPAC as some black person stands up and says,

    “Pres. Orban, that’s all well and good in Hungary. Get back to me when youir population ceases getting govermnment checks, ends killingcildren in the womb and you hav the slightestclue of US socializaton beween blacks and whites in the US. That you can lay the black card — hardly anyhing new, it’s common practice. ”

    My comments are not an endorsement of crime. Speaking of which, its a hard sell to demand that the ne’re do well blacks do better as they watch whites literally sell out the country from underneath them to mexicans, asians and anyone who won’t exercise the fullness of the US experience. Namely keep things cozy — which skin color — the very nature of black skin raises a host of issues. Blacks will have to accept their lack of acceptance for quite some time to come.

    By the way Gen/Sec of State Powell wante tio attack Iraq, but he at east favored a limited more incisive measure. Presidential material — I think so.

    This morning I listened to a white lawyer lie for the fith time before a judge and of courte the judge bought ity hook line and sinker, despite the record on paper of events, that can only bne skewed by clerks advising jduges — the clerks nearly all went, hispanic or native american — guess whgere

    White Palm Springs. last year when the lawyes back was up against it, it appears a tough the jduge and he conspired to engage in a continunce for the mere purpose of finding something they could use to reset the course of events to their favor — that’s white integrity and honestly.

    I really like WS, but if 2007/2008 is any indicaion of white truthfulness and virtue. Then by golly gee wow . . . that is some standard and I have been a spporter of the Ws process. But the matter is now laid bare. Unfetered wall street, commerce, business of any kind simply cannot be trusted and that is sad. What is more is that white congress has engaged in aiding and abetting the process with a failure to hold individuals accountable for mistakes and then not allwig the capitalist process to correct the matter by way of bailing them out of the system the made. Home onwnership has not recovered.

    Excuse me if I say any suggetion of a recovered economy by way of stock prices, and catterwaulling about that the same is an indication of an executives outstanding policies is abolute nonsense. GDP, if we seriously understood how GDP is calculated we would be at a loss that the system we have remains afloat. . . . as I recall most economists and advosors of the same — white. The first nonwhite, kinda sorta brown person in the executive actually took the advice of his white superiors . . . Syria, Libya, Yemen, Afganisthan, Iraq . . . Even the Panama papers spotlight a host of whites engaged in shemes to hide money —- including that white knight Pres Putin.

    You do realize that it was the democratic nonwhite who wanted to get s out of the mess in Ukraione and it was the current white guy in office along witha host of supposedly whote guys who undermined his policy ambitions —-

    I hate to be the one to say so — but plenty that is white is not right in any shape or form . . . but of course Candiate elect(?) will wax on about the damage that the poor economy has done to his community . . . I am at a loss how whiteness did not prevent this. But if that is the case for whites, then blacks are in the clear by a multiple deviations. Imagine that being denied work has negative impact on conduct —– hmmmm.

  20. The 1980s were a fine time to be a teenager! I liked Miami Vice. It was a good tv show.

  21. @Rich

    I know. I’m not defending a gay agenda necessarily, only that Buchanan’s rhetoric on certain topics polarized the camps in a way the mainstream wanted.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  22. “The 1980s were a fine time to be a teenager! I liked Miami Vice. It was a good tv show.”

    You can still watch the entire program season 1 to the end on cable

  23. @EliteCommInc.

    I don’t vote democratic, but apparently a lot of republicans jumped ship to vote for the first nonwhite executive president — so apparently he was qualified.

    • Replies: @Ace
  24. @Priss Factor

    “Clinton … locked up record number of black males, bringing crime way down”

    People forget that. Clinton, Biden, Hillary all correctly labeled the “superpredators” causing most of the violent crime, and somehow a political consensus was arrived at, such that, thankfully, many more tens of thousands of the savages were locked up, and probably thousands of innocent lives were saved over the next two decades.

    I wish, in vain of course, that we could find that national consensus to [i]crush[/i] violent criminals again.

  25. SafeNow says:

    Conservatives should be asking why Republicans didn’t end all this nonsense when they could have. They were foolish and cowardly.

    Actually, it was the late 1960’s, and it would have been extremely easy to nip it in the bud, and the center of gravity for bud-nipping was exactly where I was: The “elite” New England universities. Spineless students like me found it easier to just keep our heads down, and of course the spineless faculty and spineless administrators had the greatest power to nip it in the bud. What is a spineless administrator, SafeNow. Give me an example. He is a college president who calls you, a not-spineless conservative, into his office, and you expect that he is going to assure you he will punish the people who did this to you. Instead, he points to the phone, and says, I think you’ve worn out your welcome here; I will call the college president at any university you wish, and tomorrow you will be a student there. Just tell me the name, and I’ll pick up the phone.

  26. “I don’t know why Obama is such a bogey man for you.”

    He sanctified Trayvon Martin. He vilified whites for using passive defense against thugs (‘locking their car doors when black men approach.’) He and Eric Holder loosened school discipline standards so that blacks could ‘act black’ without consequences. There was his ‘police acted stupidly’ assessment of the Gates incident. It was during his first term that all the MSM began running daily editorials about the evils of ‘whiteness,’ and listing all the new ‘unpacking’ duties that whites would be expected to saddle henceforth. That’s just off the top of my head. Whether by stupidity or malice, Obama [i]undeniably[/i] damaged race relations in America.

  27. @gutta percha

    I wish, in vain of course, that we could find that national consensus to [i]crush[/i] violent criminals again.

    The gliberals tried to have it both ways. On the one hand, lock up blacks but under the abstract category of ‘super-predators’ than as black thugs, which were what they were. This won over urban whites and Jews who got tired of black crime. But in order to placate the blacks, Clinton went out his way to show that he LOVES black people. Indeed, he was called the ‘first black president’. He flattered black ego at every turn, especially among celebrities that blacks(and whites) look up to.

    So, even though the reality was that crime declined because Clinton locked up lots of blacks who commit much of the crime, the favored narrative was Clinton uplifted black pride against the ‘racist’ GOP and the likes of Rush Limbaugh. Even as blacks were being locked up, there was increased PC propagandizing about black nobility, sainthood of MLK, and of course Mandela, then anointed as MLK-extra.

    So, while crime dropped precipitously because black thugs were locked up, a whole generation of whites and blacks were raised on Noble Negro dogma. Also, jungle fever was promoted and rap was made cool.

    And precisely because crime dropped in places like NY and Chicago, white urbanites could live the Noble Negro fantasy and forget about why the crime really dropped. With reduced crime, fewer whites were mugged by reality and could pretend that what they see on TV is real.

    And so, something like BLM movement was possible and in 202o whites wokerals handed the key to the city to the blacks thinking they’re angels and saints. The result?

    This is why, if there is to be a next time, we must remind everyone over and over that crime is essentially a black problem and that the only way to reduce it to get tough on black thuggery and not flatter black egotism.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Rooster16
  28. Same is true with the UK, Canada and Australia. The tory parties there all did nothing to stop immigration that was destroying them politically and helping their political rivals.

    • Replies: @Ace
  29. Cris M. says:

    As lost opportunity-s of the nineties I tend to broader view, worst, females failing to reject the pumping ‘single mom’ bs or ‘super mom’ bs and daycare dumping con, and people generally failing to do social pressure so -no one would be breeding that wasn’t first an activist. It has been the biggest ignorance not only that decade but longer. The first job in life to make sure no gang is out to murder earth and you with it, and to be part of tribe, make sure no one or gang has more weapons than you. The first job in life is Not breeding, that is last. Also people ignoring ‘gmo’ corn and soy takeover of land, destroying nature for poison, and the offshoring of jobs, also surveilance scheme by ‘internet’, and ‘cel fones’, and, people seeing the dot com bs only to then ignore the end of decade clinton and republicans repealing glass steagal to set ramping fake ‘real estate value’ for later implosion, and people yet sit. Consequences. Would agree the cons were pushing social dividing scheme, though more by immigration, more ramped with bush nine eleven ‘go shopping’ ignorance the last twenty years, and continues. In my opinion every day is lost opportunity to stop their agendas.

    Sharp article premise btw.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
  30. @Emma S.

    It was Jews who did all this to us.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, Druid55
  31. @Charles Pewitt

    It was Jews who were responsible for the ruinous 1965 immigration act. Never forget that.

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  32. “The gliberals tried to have it both ways. On the one hand, lock up blacks but under the abstract category of ‘super-predators’ than as black thugs, which were what they were. This won over urban whites and Jews who got tired of black crime . . .”

    I have been a fairly outspoken critic of that administration and that executive, welfare to work should have been maintained — sure. But I have no idea idea where you drag up this lowered school standards so black kids could act out.

    as for celebrities and politicians – laugh. Hardly a black creation. Whites have been glamorizing both criminals and celebrities before there was film.

    As for Trayvon Martin, he was a young man who was stalked by some unknown “creepy guy” and chose to stand his ground and got shot for it. As it turns out the country now knows the shooter was in fact some strange “creepy guy” oddly enough, not the hero once touted, even the NRA is ran away.

    As for your other nonsense . . . Al Capone and Charlie Luciano were real sweet guys . . . . black thugs gave nothing on the Mexican and Russian gangs running the streets or local district precincts. As for crime, according to Mr Vance, unemployment and drugs are responsible.

  33. I remember, once, I was jumped by a group of Blacks in High School. That erased any feelings of White guilt I ever had, immediately!

  34. @EliteCommInc.

    As for Trayvon Martin, he was a young man who was stalked by some unknown “creepy guy” and chose to stand his ground and got shot for it.

    That’s not what the jury decided based on everyone’s testimony, Zimmerman’s multiple accounts before the trial, the on the scene witnesses and the one I discuss next, the forensic evidence etc.

    That’s you’re an NPC is obvious when you say “creepy guy” because that came (indirectly, we think) from the woman who was talking to Martin via cell phone before Martin doubled back and attacked Zimmerman because he was judged on no evidence from Martin’s viewpoint as being a “creepy guy” and of course the usual black aggression.

    And none of this has anything to do with Obama’s role as a racial arsonist before the facts were generally available.

    • Agree: Philmuhcrevis
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  35. @anonymouseperson

    It was Jews who were responsible for the ruinous 1965 immigration act. Never forget that.

    Irish too, but they’re not longer a national level politically relevant ethnic group. Specific examples include the first of one informal name for the Hart–(((Celler))) Act, Teddy Kennedy in the Senate, RFK who I think was out of formal power at the time, and no doubt others.

    Peoples from outside the Hajnal line are generally dangerous to white interests.

    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  36. Feryl says:
    @Priss Factor

    The early Grunge bands had talent, but the clone bands who rode their coat-tails were often embarrassingly untalented at either writing or playing music, in addition to the fact that most of them operated on a state of resigned rage that wears thin after a while. It took until like 1998 for warmth and joy to appear in rock music again.

    • Replies: @omegabooks
  37. Everything changed with the attacks of September 11th, 2001!

    • Replies: @Druid55
    , @JR Foley
  38. Feryl says:

    One thing not discussed yet is that the 90’s were the peak of the “evangelical”/generic non-denominational Christian culture amongst predominately Midwestern Teutonic and Southern Celtic whites (hereby referred to as Heartland whites) of the suburbs and rural America, which manifested itself in rock concert mega churches with Rock star preachers, a great deal of word (but not necessarily deed) invested in responsible and sober family values culture, and fundamentalist paranoia about decadent modernism.

    This was all a contrast to the WASPs embracing impotence and Jews going full throttle culture of critique in the 90’s. Meanwhile, Italians, Poles, Irish-Catholics etc. found themselves not just hated by WASPs and Jews but also increasingly over-run by newly imported ethnic groups in the Northeast. But Heartland America had yet to see that many immigrants in the 90’s, unless you count Texas which in any case has ample size to dampen tension, unlike the Northeast. Hell in most of the South and Midwest yer occasional Latin-American or Asian seemed a curio not worth much concern.

    Nowadays The Boomers who embraced the 90’s Christian Right (mostly out of guilt for all the partying they did in the 70’s and 80’s) are increasingly irreligious, not that it’s a shock as it fits the Boomer pattern of narcissistically self-chosen and self-defined nebulous and fashionable “values” culture being a sorry replacement for the actual observance of venerable communal and behavioral traditions. BTW, Gen X and following generations, who grew up in the chaos of broken homes, TV as babysitter, etc., tend to see any set of values or traditions as a failed enterprise that only a fool would still believe in. After all, they saw the Boomers do a total face-plant and “ruin” every thing they ever touched. But all this opened the door to the porno and nihilist culture of post-2000 even though most post-Boomers are too depressed and aloof to be as Dionysian as Boomers were in the 70’s and 80’s.

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  39. @EliteCommInc.

    As for Trayvon Martin, he was a young man who was stalked by some unknown “creepy guy” and chose to stand his ground and got shot for it. As it turns out the country now knows the shooter was in fact some strange “creepy guy” oddly enough, not the hero once touted, even the NRA is ran away.

    Interesting take on that whole scenario.. Total bullshit, but nonetheless interesting. I guess the Hispanic Jew should have waited for the ghetto two step on his head before defending himself right? No way to know (thankfully) but old Georgie ending that violent, thieving munt’s life probably saved some other poor schmuck’s life, other than his own that is.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  40. KenH says:

    The 1990’s was not the golden age in race relations and domestic politics that Matt Walsh thinks it was. I think he’s in his late 30’s so he was only a sheltered teenager at the close of that century and the world looks much different than being an adult out on your own.

    The 1990’s was definitely better than the woke tyranny and naked anti-whiteness that we are living under today but the seeds were being planted back then with anti-white themed movies and anti-white comedy skits. Jeff Foxworthy was known for his “redneck” jokes in the 1990’s but in the 1980’s you had black comedians like Eddie Murphy roasting and lampooning other black people.

    The problem is that most whites back then were so raceless and oafish (due to decades of race doesn’t matter propaganda) that they just shrugged their shoulders over these slights and insults and reasoned that it was part of living in a “free society” rather than than viewing these as opening salvos in the war against whites. Whites were being softened up for the extreme anti-whiteness and genocidal intent that we see today.

    Believe it or not the Democrat party under Clinton was to the right of the Republicans on immigration. The “Republican Revolution” of 1994 ignored the much needed reforms that were needed.

    Even though America was still supermajority white in the 90’s it was starting to feel like the nation was slipping away and changing economically and culturally for the worse. The white working class was starting to get left out in the cold. This helped lead to Pat Buchanan’s presidential campaigns but nation was still too white and things were still too good economically for most whites for them to answer the call.

  41. “As for Trayvon Martin, he was a young man who was stalked by some unknown “creepy guy” and chose to stand his ground and got shot for it.”

    I won’t comment on juries decision Sometimes the obvious gets lost in minutia. Hence the complex on the scene analy6sis of a scared kid acting “tough” when followed by a “creepy guy”. I won’t defend the wisdom of back tracking to confront said “creepy guy”. Fortunately, i have no idea what NPC means. Laughing, but I do enjoy your take on the evidence of the dead young man — who’s point of was not presented.

    i exercise late at night. Last night a a white van or truck was parked against curb with sidewalk door open. it is my habit to walk against traffic and avoid anything that looks like trouble but I also have to watch for oncoming traffic but I avoid died the van meaning i stepped out into the street side to go around whatever was happening. i died anyone could say they saw me coming from around the side of the van having bought drugs. Who’s to say, I am dead. The point of view of the dead person is unknown.

    point of view . . . . laughing. Save that he stated some “creepy guy” was following him.

    As for ” racial arsonist”

    apparently, you are unfamiliar with Florida’s history. I won’t respond to the executives lean on that history.

    But it really is a side issue that is ever present regardless of who is in office. I can’t erase history for you. i can say that any male who if removing that nonsense of “black aggression” a common trope of fear mongering, would get what took place regardless of skin color. it’s not that complicated. man follows kid, kid decides he won’t be punked or intimidated and sneaks around to confront stalker —- kid doesn’t know that said stalker is carrying a weapon. I won’t defend kids choice to confront . . . but that choice is about manliness to his own defence, not skin color.

    i know, i know that is not the story that was told. And i get the history that blacks are to be complacent or they will be by definition monstrous thugs menacing . . . .

    just , my point of view and creepy stalkers have not yet killed me

  42. The 1990s was also the beginning of the moral panic about stalkers!

  43. @That Would Be Telling

    I can remember people, whites of course, thinking, “now that we’ve elected a black president we can cap all this racial stuff.”

    Many of us hoped for the best.

    We got nothing but hate and censorship in return.

    That is what turned me from cuckservative to race realist.

    • Replies: @JackOH
    , @Alvin
  44. “Interesting take on that whole scenario.. Total bullshit, but nonetheless interesting. I guess the Hispanic Jew should have waited for the ghetto two step on his head before defending himself right? No way to know (thankfully) but old Georgie ending that violent, thieving munt’s life probably saved some other poor schmuck’s life, other than his own that is.”

    What a bizarre comment. The gentleman in question’ ethnic or faith and practice has no bearing on the issues.

    Here’s the real issue, that simplicity brings to the matter. just because you are on the losing side of a fight or incident you caused, does not entitle you to a claim of self defense. The statue was not intended for you to provoke a confrontation , become a threat and then claim self defense. In all ways, at times’ from the start, the gentleman in question is clearly the aggressor. Even after being told not to do so by police — his imprudent and provacative action is the sole cause of the incident.

    When I walk, when i hear a noise from behind, i stop and look and even wait.

    Cutting the story short by focusing on the actual confrontation changes the scenario — a common practice by lawyers who defend police officers. it’s like hyper focusing on a few bad actors 23 hours a day and concluding that all such are bad actors. So we focus on the confrontation as opposed to the cause or causes. If i lived in an apartment complex and someone was following, never identified themselves and my attempts to evade fell short — that person is reasonable threat and my choice of self defense in the case of this young man, confront and use his body — perfectly reasonable. The stalkers use of the weapon is understandable, since his provocation has placed him in jeopardy — but that jeopardy is his own doing.

    it’s not black or white thing

    When i find myself behind someone as i walk, usually give a wide berth so as to avoid provoking to avoid causing a concern and if a tad to tired — i slow down and finally a stuttering excuse me.

    my view would be different if at any time, the gentleman in question, engaging in “creepy” conduct had done one very simple thing

    identified himself —

    now he still has no real authority to stop and detain based on being black or even not living in the neighborhood . . . . but at least his conduct would be reasonable and simply — prudent minus that

    He was solely responsible.

    Hmmmm . . . you know i never considered the show: the prosecutor one good Hispanic to another good deed — giving it to the black community — common cause. not an uncommon practice in the bid to see who can please whites better as citizens. interesting.

    Mr. Unz and many others would be proud . . . though I suspect most already got the message with a wink and nod.

    laugh.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
    , @GenFranco
  45. @Feryl

    Interesting comment. I pick a nit about:

    Meanwhile, Italians, Poles, Irish-Catholics etc. found themselves not just hated by WASPs and Jews but also increasingly over-run by newly imported ethnic groups in the Northeast. But Heartland America had yet to see that many immigrants in the 90’s, unless you count Texas….

    Northern Virginia, the part next to D.C. got “over-run” by Hispanics in this period, so it was wider than just the Northeast. How much I can’t say, in my part of the Heartland we’ve got too many but not many yet on an absolute scale.

  46. anarchyst says:

    The “remaking of history” is alive and well. From ignoring major transgressions by negroes and jews to actually “changing the history” to favor negroes and jews, the “progressive” (communist) movement is “on the march” to whitewash white history for its own gains.
    There are still attempts by jewish interests to exonerate jew serial rapist murderer Leo Frank, despite overwhelming evidence that proves his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. No amount of jewish shekels or political influence was enough to get Frank off. Fortunately, he was brought to true justice at the end of a rope.
    The same shenanigans are being used in the Emmett Till case,declaring that Till’s assault of Carolyn Bryant Donham was based on falsehoods, despite others who witnessed Till’s assault on her.
    Both negro and jewish interests want to keep the Emmett Till story alive by demonizing Donham for their own interests. In fact, there are presently attempts to activate a warrant for Donham, claiming that she was involved in Till’s demise despite her being Till’s “victim”. It is interesting to note that no responsibility is being placed on Emmett Till’s own behavior, leading up to his demise.
    There are many other examples of “history” being falsified…

    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Thanks: Ace
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  47. The 1990’s was when the Education, sector made up mostly of Feminist, figured out they could force their money grubbing woke narrative on everyone and set themselves up for life. Any serious writer about race relations cannot constantly ignore how close Feminism is tied to anti-White liberal racism and expect to be taken seriously.

  48. All this stuff about diversity, equity, and inclusion. Is it real?

    Does this DEI thing include any concern for Palestinians? There are anti-BDS laws in the US, in blue and red states, that violate the 1st amendment of the Constitution. In the 80s, it was perfectly legal to organize to boycott apartheid South Africa, but politicians and lawmakers are making it difficult or impossible to organize on behalf of Palestinians.

    If the big companies were truly devoted to INCLUSION and DIVERSITY, how come NYT and WAPO never included a single Palestinian-American voice among columnists? How come there is no scramble on part of Big Tech and Wall Street to highlight and promote Palestinian voices, like they do with blacks and homosexuals? How about a month-long celebration of Palestinian culture and remembrance of their tragedy at the hands of Zionists.

    And if they’re really about EQUALITY, how come the foreign policy of both parties favor Israel over whatever nation Jews happen to hate, like Iran and Russia, even though Israel was founded on terrorism and Nakba expulsion of 700,000 native Palestinians and continue to occupy West Bank and practice apartheid. Israel also routinely attacks Syria and supports ISIS terrorists there.

    This ‘diversity, inclusion, and equity’ stuff only favors Jews, blacks, and homosexuals. It doesn’t INCLUDE concerns about black thuggery and crime beating up and robbing and murdering countless non-blacks. It doesn’t concern Zionism’s destruction of Arabs and Muslims or the ongoing suppression of Palestinians, even in the US, via policies that would make Joe McCarthy blush.

    Speaking of equity, Jews, who are 2% of the population, control most of media, much of finance, and majority of big tech and gambling. Why no call for EQUITY so that Jews don’t disproportionately control the economy and deep state institutions? Or what about black domination of sports? How come no call for more equity in favor of gentiles over Jews or to have more non-blacks in sports? When they say ‘equity’, it means more homosexuals and more blacks. And it means enforced silence about Jewish power and privilege…. because any candid discussion of such would ‘ANTISEMITIC’, but it’s perfectly okay for Jews to impugn ‘whiteness’ 24/7. And all the opprobrium is targeted at white gentiles.

    So, DEI fails even on its own principles. Good or bad, it’d be at least consistent if it practiced what it preached. But it’s really just Jewish Supremacist Power manipulating ‘social justice’ slogans to push their narrow tribal agenda.

    DEI is really about Jews using blacks to guilt-bait whites into emotional submission and obeisance, whereupon Jews direct white energies at whatever they hate, like Palestinians, Iran, and Russia(and of course the Deplorables). And Jews use homosexuals as their global agents all around the world. Any bunch of homosexuals who collaborate with Jewish Power against their own nation is richly rewarded and elevated to top positions. Homosexuals crawl all over the Deep State and fully support and enable the Zionist terror against Palestinians.
    And BLM is used to justify US imperialism. “We care so much about blacks, and that makes us GOOD people, and that justifies whatever military actions we take around the world.” Yes, paint the bombs either ‘gay’ or ‘BLM’ and drop them on Iranians, Syrians, and Arabs.

  49. @Happy Tapir

    … Buchanan’s rhetoric on certain topics polarized the camps in a way the mainstream wanted.

    The only “polarizing” rhetoric that Buchanan ever uttered consisted of his remarks noting plain-as-day-obvious facts about Jewish power. Nothing else he said or did ever really mattered in any decisive sense, because no issue is decisive in US politics except for the crime of noticing that the United States is in a perennial bare-butt-upwards position vis-à-vis the Jews.

    I was watching the McLaughlin Group on that Sunday morning in 1990 when Buchanan made the unquestionably true crack about Capitol Hill being Israeli-occupied territory. Before the day was over, every Jewish group of which I had ever heard and a great many whose names were new to me had denounced Buchanan as an anti-Semite. It was then that I first began to awake to the fact that “anti-Semite” was simply a rude term for someone who sees and, even worse, speaks the truth about the Jews.

  50. @EliteCommInc.

    laugh.

    I laughed, a lot at your long winded and for the lack of a better term, stupid response. The part where I get hazy on your defense of St Trayvon is the forensic evidence gathered by law enforcement. Most importantly the back of old Georgie’s coconut. I’d be on your side had Zimmerman been unmarked and Martin not been shot in the chest with a muzzle burn from a contact firearm shot. The simple truth here that you seem so determined to avoid is had Georgie not had a firearm that night, he’d be dead or would have suffered severe head trauma proven by the photos of the back of his head. Oh and one more thing, 12 people that heard ALL of the evidence agreed with me and most reasonable thinking people. And your yet again ridiculous comment of “it’s not a white or black thing” could be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this blog. EVERYTHING when it comes to nig-grows getting killed by anyone not black is a black or white thing.

  51. “The part where I get hazy on your defense of St Trayvon is the forensic evidence gathered by law enforcement.”

    Yawn. my response encompasses what the police did. Their analysis indicates that indicates that the young man did in deed back track to confront his stalker. Well, uhhh . . no kidding. And so what? IOt simply ignores the obvious . . . some strange gut was following him. And instead of heading home as he should, in my opinion. He opted to confront, clearly an act of self defense – period. There is no indication he was in the neighborhood to do ill of any kind. He was targeted and stalked. The fact that the prosecutor failed to nail home that point and proceed from there demonstrates just how show and tell the process was.

    every parameter demonstrates that the young man in question , in his mind, was at risk. And any reasonable person would conclude as much. Hence the defense reliance on all things except what took place before , its like coming into a movie in the middle and deciding you get the film. This is a common tactic in confrontations, hence the who struck first game . . .

    simple question answered resolves that — who was first at threat that preciptated all other subsequent behavior. well

    the young man minding his own business talking to his friend on the phone and as i recall he calls her twice . . . regardless once was enough to establish his state of mind. he opted not to flee but in typical male

    i’m not backing down fashion” he stood his ground and confronted his stalker. the choice to strike first — pure self defense.

    —————

    i respond walking in a suburban neighborhood — taking that scenario in a dimly lit apartment complex . . . it’s not that complicated what went on that night. And who was at fault.

    Here’s what’s funny, the russia surrounded by NATO crowd defending an adult stalking a kid at night in some dark enclosed space. That young man had more justification than Russia to respond.

  52. @EliteCommInc.

    He surprised the stalker . . . but that choice was clearly an act of self defense.

    again, not hard to comprehend at all.

    By the way, i have no issues with store owners shooting looters in defense of self or property — uh not shooting kids in the back because they stole a candy bar and dashing out — that is in my view a tad excessive — but one has a right to protect one’s person and property —

    and that includes Trayvon Martin — even if I disagree with his choice.

  53. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Philmuhcrevis

    A good Christian would have turned the other cheek. Or skull, whatever. Let he who is without sin throw the first stone bullet. Resist not evil.

    Zimmerman, clearly a non-Christian, isn’t a neighbour, and thus bearing false witness against him is not against any commandments.

    America is a very, very Christian nation.

  54. @EliteCommInc.

    Their analysis indicates that indicates that the young man did in deed back track to confront his stalker. Well, uhhh . . no kidding. And so what? IOt simply ignores the obvious . . . some strange gut was following him.

    This comment/opinion says it all when listening to people like you that are convinced that the NAPA in nearly all cases can do no wrong, and are almost always allowed to beat the shit out of anyone that dare try and confront them about their intentions while walking between houses where they have absolutely no business being. What your little mind just cannot seem to comprehend is that St. Trayvon had a choice that night, to use or not use physical violence against someone he felt was “dissin” him and his blackness. The truth is he was a fucking thief and was looking for houses to break into at some point. The skittles and grape drank story is as laughable as the jogger story in Georgia.

    Occam’s Razor, as it pertains to the NAPA.. The simplest explanation is usually the correct answer.

    If you see a nig-grow shuffling around houses in neighborhoods they don’t live in, walking into homes under construction they’re nearly always up to no damn good. A lot of time has passed since St. Travon ended his own life because of a stupid decision, but in contrast the Ahmaud Arbrey case is a perfect example of how quickly things have changed in how our justice system deals with whitey when a NAPA is killed, either justifiably or otherwise.

    Had Arbrey chose not to walk up and pull on the business end of a 12 gauge shotgun he’d still be alive today. But that would’ve required him to go back to his nest and admit he was a little bitch and didn’t stand up to the white devils. One guy stupidly gets out of a truck trying to keep an obvious thief up to no good within eyeshot until the cops get there ends up, along with his two friends that stupidly didn’t understand today’s political and racial climate are now all serving life without parole which in this case only one person should’ve been charged and with at most 1st degree manslaughter. The other two who never fired a shot and somehow prosecutors and jurors magically became mind readers and just knew that all three were racist heathens with premeditated murder on their minds are now the gold standard on what a white person has to take into consideration when confronted with the notion of is it worth it to even call the police on these neighborhood ruining shit stains. My policy is to avoid them at all cost until they make that impossible.

  55. “This comment/opinion says it all when listening to people like you that are convinced that the NAPA in nearly all cases can do no wrong, and are almost always allowed to beat the shit out of anyone that dare try and confront them about their intentions while walking between houses where they have absolutely no business being. What your little mind just cannot seem to comprehend is that St. Trayvon had a choice that night, to use or not use physical violence against someone he felt was “dissin” him and his blackness. The truth is he was a . . . thief and was looking for houses to break into at some point. The skittles and grape drank story is as laughable as the jogger story in Georgia.”

    First when responding to my comments, I would prefer you avoid the use of colorful language, even the abbreviation of “b . .” is too far and unneccessary.

    Second, the above comment has no value to the discussion. I make no claims that about anyone being without flaw — ever. There is no question that the young man in question was trespassing or anything of the kind. Again a simple,

    “Excuse me . . . I am so and so and I just wanted to check if you needed help or were lost . . .”

    the fact that the young was suspicious in the mind of the adult is simply not enough to warrant anything more than suspicion — this is not a c0omplex scenario at all — a kid is walking at night in an enclosed or semi enclosed compound and some stranger is following. If anyone has cause to be suspicious, it is the young man. I am not sure skin color rates. Being black and walking in a complex is not a crime and warranted no action by the adult in question. Nothing reported by the adult is even a hint of criminal activity . . . and further the record is pretty clear he was their visiting with his father — uhhh, that is not suspicious either.

    Third, I have no idea if the young man was shuffling. But if he was, that is not a crime or suspicious conduct either. I think your comments suggest that blackness alone is cause for suspicion, fine, but if you act on it, it had better be associated with a crime or you might find yourself in a tough spot by your conduct. Certainly if one wants to contend fight or flight response is a choice, sure, and there was nothing illegal about that young man making the choice to confront. I won’t delve into the manutia of who struck first. The matter remains, the young man was in fact being stalked – period. He chose to stand his ground as opposed to heading home. But it is perfectly reasonable to accept that leading one’s stalker to one’s house is an unwise choice. It is very clear that the young man attempted to avoid any confrontation as his evasion demonstrates – again this incident is not hard to comprehend at all.

    “Occam’s Razor, as it pertains to the NAPA.. The simplest explanation is usually the correct answer.”

    I have no idea what NAPA means and most likely don’t care to. The sim0plest explanation is that the young man in question was walking home or at least attempting to. When the adult spotted him, he followed him, never identified himself or contact the youngman in any manner. In response to be clearly stalked, and despite evading contact, the young man decided that the stalker was a threat and defending himself by confronting his stalker.

    Your refer to Occam’s Razor to human conduct suggests your understanding of the theory is a tad shy. But if applied the simplest explanation based on the record — an adult following a kid at night created a threatening environment — a reasonable assumption. And a guy following a young male — Oy veh.

    I am going to tread lightly here — but you seem to think that merely being black is enough to justify stalking. It is not and shouldn’t be. You are correct in this, apparently millions of black people are making a choice to say, “No”. My skin color is a not a warrant to to pursue, capture, detain or even question me. And are in fact making a choice to challenge anyone who does, even in the face of obvious jeopardy. Young Mr. Arbery had every right to stand his ground and in his case, his pusuers had weapons in full view and the cause for fear was immediate. I am deeply concerned that you have no clue of what constitutes danger.

    If millions and i suspect that to be the case, in the tens and tens of millions of white people believe as you do and nothing suggests that the opposite is true. Then the black population by the very nature of being black is criminal of held to suspicion and treated as such —

    then one can easily conclude that the nation is in fact a nation with deep rooted bias’s against blacks on something as benign as skin color and have created a national environment in which the black population has a legitimate fear and complaint – you are making their case. The two gentleman in question had no cause to confront that young man at all. There was no crime, save trespass, if that and that warranted no response. Mt deep concern is the clashes now on display is more and more blacks — males especially acting as though they are citizens of the country and expect that whites will respond accordingly —

    My guess is that whites will not respond accordingly. They will in fact chaffe under the reality and there will be — are repercussions as it becomes clear — blacks are not accepted ad citizens in the US – certainly not as equal participants. I think you represent the typical white person as represented in either party or any economic class. More clashes are in store and whites will move to protect their status as either natural or legal holders of power.

    The young man in Georgia had every right to defend himself

    More concerning and most likely accurate is how many of US officers, court officials, politicians who make laws, and others have acted as you seem to suggest is by skin color default the way it was, is and should remain. That the black population by default of skin color is suspicious and should be treated as such — creating a climate in which black citizens are perpetually at risk.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  56. JackOH says:
    @Justvisiting

    JV, you’ve got that right.

    In my 95+% White state congressional district, Democrat primary voters were presented with two Black candidates. Both “talented tenth” types. I heard absolutely nothing regarding the race of the candidates. That won’t make a difference, because it’s never enough for the “bottom 40%”.

    After Obama was elected, I was treated to a Black dude repeatedly prodding me with, “Your President just decided X.” He assumed I didn’t vote for Obama. He was right. I’ve voted Libertarian for decades. Didn’t matter. The Black Supremacist looked at the color of my pelt and that was that.

  57. AceDeuce says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    First simple test. Affirmative has never benfitted blacks as much as it has wites. it never has.

    Nice links. Not.

    As to your assertion:

    Uh huh, and “Whites do drugs a lot more than black people do”. And “Whites commit more crimes than blacks.” Those are the second and third same old songs on the album
    “Fairy Tales for Cucky Wuckies”.

    Here’s a simple test for you: If the above statements are true, how come every time there is talk of eliminating or cutting back on affirmative action, the only people we hear crying about it are negroes (and liberal negro lovers and blacks’ behalf)?

    Ditto for toughening up on crime and tougher drug laws.

  58. “In my 95+% White state congressional district, Democrat primary voters were presented with two Black candidates.”

    If the nexus of the issue was the presidency, your comment might some salience. But as it ism the choice to select a nonwhite, who according to most examples was compliant to white wishes to avoid controversy would skim the surface to the lives of 48 million citizens.

    I would that could, but it does not. The country is going to have to reflect something more realistic than the cliche’

    “When i am good boy they sometimes throw me a bone.”

    it is admittedly painful and a long work to unravel the social consequence of blacks white relations and to do without simply destroying the value of the system created.

    admittedly, i am of low IQ and not very bright. just accepting the indictment before it gets made.

  59. “Uh huh, and “Whites do drugs a lot more than black people do”. And “Whites commit more crimes than blacks.” Those are the second and third same old songs on the album
    “Fairy Tales for Cucky Wuckies””

    The above comments are entirely something y9ou have made up and would love to attribute to my way of thinking . . . hate to disappoint. I have made no such contend.
    having posted numerous citations previously, i will indulge your press as a courtesy. even Fox news has granted that out — finally acknowledging the numbers.

    https://time.com/4884132/affirmative-action-civil-rights-white-women/

    http://hlrecord.org/affirmative-action-benefits-white-people/

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-benefits-from-affirmative-action-white-men/2017/08/11/4b56907e-7eab-11e7-a669-b400c5c7e1cc_story.html

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/affirmative-action-white-women_n_56a0ef6ae4b0d8cc1098d3a5

    https://www.brit.co/newsflash-affirmative-action-most-benefits-white-women/

    https://madamenoire.com/282653/studies-show-affirmative-action-helps-white-women-more-than-others/

    https://www.justgreatlawyers.com/legal-guides/affirmative-action-statistics-facts

    https://www.courant.com/opinion/op-ed/hc-op-best-reparations-0809-20200809-zepspbrrv5byzm42v4ueqdcpte-story.html

    Editorial:
    https://www.pulitzer.org/article/who-are-real-beneficiaries-affirmative-action

    I learned that back in 1993 or ’96 from looking at labor stats, but has been true since the early nineties, probably from it’s application — which is nothing like what is applied today. But conservatives such as myself have been whining about for without admitting the truth. And the whine has largely — wall near entirely false. Conservative ethics

    I have noted and supported it dor as long as I have been visiting this sight , for years.

    Other little known facts, blacks have only been part of the welfare system since the 1960’s and have never been singularly singled out for welfare programs involving government in any mass scale — now I have not checked lately, but i doubt there has been any change. Id so . . I have no issues in that being indicated.

  60. “Here’s a simple test for you: If the above statements are true, how come every time there is talk of eliminating or cutting back on affirmative action, the only people we hear crying about it are negroes (and liberal negro lovers and blacks’ behalf)?”

    Oyyy . . . nonsense. Not only are african americans not the only ones, it’s quite typical for whites of either political persuasion to use them as fronts for t5heir own agendas.

    And why whites of either persuasion toss in transgender polity, homosexual polity, and women’s polity, immigrant polity into the same mix, rarely ever forgetting to mention something about blacks
    Now the target term is CRT, not that anyone much outside academia comprehends it — but the repeated refrain about teaching white kids to hate themselves Ugggggg

    utter nonsense . . in spades. Women are the first in line regarding the defense of affirmative action, but they will of front blacks . . . our politics and social arena is full of nasty low end games to win . . . and in the game if employment opportunity — White females triple t5he size of the entire african american population — despite their role in marginalizing blacks and others are very keen to call hurt and have white boys running over each other to fetch.

    ——————

    noone in texas is up in arms about the illegal communities being built for illegals —

    • Replies: @Exile
  61. ‘ but old Georgie ending that violent, thieving munt’s life probably saved some other poor schmuck’s life, other than his own that is.”

    Well, that’s one take. Here’s another. There is no way to know who threw the first punch. but we do know who was stalking who.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  62. Exile says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    “it’s quite typical for whites of either political persuasion to use them as fronts for t5heir own agendas.”

    You forgot to mention Fellow Whites.

  63. @EliteCommInc.

    but we do know who was stalking who.

    You should write books.. You write a lot of words that really say or do nothing but take up space.

    GEORGE ZIMMERMAN WAS A NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH LEADER AND BY RIGHT OF THEIR HOA WAS WELL WITHIN THE LAW TO FOLLOW THIS THUG, PUNK.

    The kid that by photographic evidence tried to open his head up on a concrete sidewalk was the only person that broke any laws that night. Make up excuses for this mutt all you want, he could have easily ran away and lived. But by the hazy logic of people like you, anyone black that feels threatened has the right to beat people for any reason up to and including just “feeling” threatened. Had this gone the other way and Zimmerman not had a gun and was beaten to death, this whole story would have never gotten past the local news and Martin would’ve probably been charged with some ridiculous C felony and he’d be back on the streets as I write this being black and beautiful knowing full well he killed someone for no reason other than in the new America he simply could.

  64. @EliteCommInc.

    but you seem to think that merely being black is enough to justify stalking. It is not and shouldn’t be. You are correct in this, apparently millions of black people are making a choice to say, “No”. My skin color is a not a warrant to to pursue, capture, detain or even question me.

    It has nothing to do with their skin color, and everything with their off the charts despicable behavior. I lived through busing and desegregation in the 70’s and 80’s, it was like culture shock on steroids. The first time I ever saw a firearm in a school it was in the hand of a black male.

    All, I mean ALL of the neighborhoods that I grew up in that are now 40+% black are now violent crime infested shitholes. The houses in them that always appreciated in value over time are now worth less than they were 40 years ago. In large numbers they destroy everything they come in contact with.

    The defense mechanisms that Whites, Asians and many other races of people have developed around blacks didn’t happen because they’re racist, it happened out of self preservation. It’s like someone looking at a 450 pound silverback gorilla and saying if you’re nervous to be around that animal, it’s not that the animal can physically rip your arms off, it’s because you have a predisposed negative bias toward it, which triggers it into violence. This is proven by blacks that understand this obvious truth and at the very moment they are able they move as far away from majority black neighborhoods as possible.

    Chris Rock’s diatribe on Niggaz, his word not mine, was not only funny, it was more truthful about the majority of blacks in this country than has ever been spoken, before and since, in my opinion.

    Remember the OJ verdict and the videos of how blacks and Whites reacted? That was the moment I became a race realist and understood that it doesn’t matter how smart, well dressed or well behaved they seem to be, underneath they’ll choose their race over everything else. And now they have hoards of ignorant fools that are more than happy to help them achieve what they’ve been wanting all along, revenge. And the funny part is that most are too ignorant to understand that White Europeans are the race of people that ended slavery, and that the very thing they hold against us is still happening in their motherland to this very day.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
  65. @EliteCommInc.

    “Russian” gangs

    lol — those so-called “Russian” gangs are about as “Russian” as the Purple Gang was. Or the Israeli Mafia is…
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_mafia#Russian_mafia
    But you knew that, of course.

  66. Excuse my verbosity if one can — my ignorance, my low IQ . . . my irritating kant prognosticating on truth . . . my forte is lecture . . . I am a lousy lousy writer admittedly.

    “It has nothing to do with their skin color, and everything with their off the charts despicable behavior. I lived through busing and desegregation in the 70’s and 80’s, it was like culture shock on steroids. The first time I ever saw a firearm in a school it was in the hand of a black male”

    Whoa nelly. Let’s not smoke screen this. Your comments are very clear and to the point as are those of others. Your skin color only matters as you present it — i just look at the arguments. I am sure there are plenty of black citizens who hold your sentiments — those other blacks ruining it for the rest

    Laugh

    Your first references were to skin color — which are really nonfactors. I am sure there are others who have visited their parents in that complex and walking in the evening are never considered anything . . .

    Nothing about neighborhood watch condones or even advocate’s the conduct of the adult aside from observing an reporting. He was instructed not to do what he did . . . he was not confronted until it became clear that some “creepy . . . guy” was following him. There’s nothing about the young man’s conduct that suggests or hints that he went into some kind of fight mode just because he saw the adult in question — that doesn’t happen. In fact, he clearly avoids confrontation or contact period.

    I hate break it to you but everything that kid did was as normal as one could expect – until the confrontation, which absolutely reasonable and understandable under the circumstances. Someone he did not know was stalking him . . . according to you — his skin color made him suspicious, shuffling is not a crime but according to you black skin and shuffling is . . . suspect . . . walking in the complex at nite is not a crime or unusual, but doing so as a black person . . . well that is another story.

    The record of your perspective is very clear.

    If there is something wrong with my perspective, you certainly have not indicated what that would be. Save some ignorance regarding the nature of blacks. However, based on the record, most blacks are any of the negatives you describe. Not half, not a third, not a quarter . . . and no doubt whatever population has the highest ownership of poverty will also display the higher levels of dysfunction by way of a mix of variables. This has nothing to do with attacking crime. The young man that night was not engaged in criminal activity. Did nothing that even hinted at criminal conduct — even as a neighbor watch member, nothing about the conduct warranted anything at all. Nothing wrong with calling the police, not even anything wrong with keeping an eye out. There is something demonstrably wrong with stalking someone and adding to their fear by never identifying yourself – by any measure inciting conduct.

    Mr. Rock’s commentary is not about most blacks. And nothing in his commentary suggests that he thinks most black citizen resemble his concerns. He simply states the obvious that some number of blacks are in fact engage in criminal conduct – hardly a national portrayal on his part. Hiding behind his commentary to justify your own suspicions and those of most white citizens — based on the sentiments supports that (I acknowledge my comments might overstate how many whites hold this perspective but if that number were only 1/3 that is some 60-66 million – I think that is right. whites and I suspect its higher). Considering levels on influence, that an enormous place of power by which to define a population, the sheer numbers would hard to overcome.

    As for the OJ trial two take aways from your comment:

    1. it takes a whole lot of money to defend oneself against a case such as was presented. white, black or green the effort mounted to test the case and the evidence is more than 90 percent of the population could afford (a mere guess on my part) white or black

    2. that if the media coverage is accurate then it reflects a division cast long before civil rights and rooted in a divided experience of a life as citizens in the US. And as usual whites had a conniption fit about this one man acquitted of murder against backdrop of questionable prosecutions since the end of slavery — that’s all it takes to get people riled — one acquittal. And I suspect that black men have been paying the price ever since.

    No citizens should grovel to what should never existed in the first place in light of the foundational document — the declaration —

    sure one appreciates not getting beaten — but taken into the account the consequence and the that the beating never should have occurred — that’s a much tougher sell.

    I cannot defend everything on the table, but I certainly won’t pretend that how the US has socialized the black population has not had long term damaging effect. And one’s skin color is irrelevant in assessing the record.

    I think there’s an article about dragging the founders through the mud . . . mud is something we all suffer through. Dr. Einstein and Charles Dickens incredibly influential on the our culture and science — but both have deeply questionable issues regarding family. Dealing with that does not dampen the impact of their contribution. As long as the country avoids the hard work – the deep core work unadulterated by same relational, transgender, immigrant and feminist (well women’s advocacy color will remain s stumbling block eroding the nation’s health.

  67. @gutta percha

    You can see a very clear difference in how the police operate by watching 1990s era re-runs of Cops with the very recent ones or even On Patrol (formerly Live PD).

    In the really old editions, the police would straight up kick people’s asses before arresting them. Moral hazard? Possibly. I’m not the one getting my ass kicked by the cops, after all. But policy sure did make huge difference.

    Its sort of like accepting the good with the bad, like how Singapore works; their policing model works to the point that there’s there’s no skid row style riff raff on the streets to harass you… but you have to behave, like goose-step behave, while there.

  68. anarchyst says:
    @Philmuhcrevis

    The case of Amhad Arbery and the three (white) Satilla residents who are presently doing “hard time” for defending themselves is a prime example of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy, which MUST be addressed and outlawed.
    Arbery was a criminal POS who was casing construction sites for tools and other materials that he could steal and sell. He was observed at the same site previously on camera as well.
    As there were break-ins and increased criminal activity, the three men were merely defending their neighborhood.
    Arbery refused to be questioned which was within his right.
    Arbery felt “disrespected” by being questioned and “doubled back”, attacking the man with the shotgun. Arbery attacked the man by pulling on the barrel of the shotgun causing it to fire. Anyone familiar with firearms knows that pulling on a barrel of a shotgun can cause it to fire.
    Arbery could (and should) have run off in any other direction, would not have been pursued, and would still be alive today. He chose to confront the man with the shotgun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
    The original prosecutor refused to indict. The powers-that-be had to “shop” for a prosecutor who would take the case. It took three tries before they found one who would indict.
    This is prosecutorial “double jeopardy” which must be addressed and outlawed nationwide. The way it stands now, what is stopping a prosecutor from one jurisdiction from indicting someone from another jurisdiction when a local prosecutor having legal jurisdiction refuses to indict? We are all in trouble if this is allowed to stand.
    Also, the court was stacked against the white men just because they are white.
    Arbery’s previous extensive criminal record was not allowed to be disclosed and put into evidence.
    So-called “civil-rights icons”, Antifa and BLM types were in the courtroom, threatening violence if the “correct verdict” was not rendered.
    The jury was also warned that there would be violence if they did not convict.
    The “judge” went along with the threats and refused to run a proper court proceeding. the mainstream media fanned the flames of racial hatred against whites, making Arbery out to be a mere “jogger”, (yeah, right). Who in their right mind jogs in work boots? The “mainstream media” stated that Arbery “was studying to be an electrician” and was merely observing construction sites…yeah, right.
    I pray that any appeals that the Satilla three place will be successful.
    Their prosecutorial double jeopardy and kangaroo court “trial” were both sh!tshow railroad jobs from the outset.

  69. “The kid that by photographic evidence tried to open his head up on a concrete sidewalk was the only person that broke any laws that night. Make up excuses for this mutt all you want, he could have easily ran away and lived.”

    Interesting that you should reference the head against concrete, it is the one area in which the police analysis suggests that the adult was not telling the truth, deceptive and not supported by the evidence.

    There is no law that demands one run away from a pusuer . . . and in both referenced incidence — self defense was a reasonable choice. In the Georgia example, given the intensity and manner of pursuit, that young man had very little option, I have no doubt that he thought these men were in fact intent on killing him.

  70. Interesting that you should reference the head against concrete, it is the one area in which the police analysis suggests that the adult was not telling the truth, deceptive and not supported by the evidence.

    Are you a compulsive liar, or do you simply do it to get a reaction? It’s a good thing for Zimmerman that his jury wasn’t as patently dishonest, or clueless as you.

  71. @Rich

    Mass Third World immigration is the flip side of “off-shoring”. Same coin — destroy US workers (blue or white collar) , their rights, power & wages.

  72. @Priss Factor

    “Also, following the end of the Cold War, the Classic Left died and what emerged as the new consciousness centered around idolatry of homos who were increasingly sanctified.”
    Correct.
    The “left” (sound of spitting) gave up on working people, accepted neoliberalism & neoconservatisism & concentrated on issues that Elites gave not a shit about — “wokism”.
    Oh so brave they were!

  73. @Occasional lurker

    Obama — the guy who allowed & protected the great public fraud in history from 2008 on.
    Not to mention Ukraine, Syria & Libya.
    What an utter scumbag.

  74. “Are you a compulsive liar, or do you simply do it to get a reaction? It’s a good thing for Zimmerman that his jury wasn’t as patently dishonest, or clueless as you.”

    I ad to spend some time considering this comment.

    excuse the delay

    there are two different issues

    1. what the jury considered

    2. the actual police “analysis”

    I spoke about and to the police report only. I said nothing about the jury. I* said it is the one area (this claim about his head being slammed against concrete) t5hat was considered questionable by the police Now i could be wrong, there may be other areas of deception, but on that claim, the detectives indicated t5hey had doubts about the veracity of the claim as it was not supported by the evidence. Now y6ou and others referenced the police analysis as the key, . I take you are now about to do a pin needle spin and suggest the report is inaccurate because it does not support your position.

    I thought there were issues with their analysis — but I have said nothing by way of challenge. I simply looked to presentation — and in that presentation — the report itself suggests that there was no head being slammed against the concrete.

    i have no idea how the jury considered that question and make no comments to that matter at all.

    You are trying to claim i am being dishonest by way of something i did not mention — the jury. My comments go to the police report only.

    ———————-

    As a rule, I don’t engage in misleading and am overly cautious to avoid even the sus[picion —

    Laugh — which can of course breed suspicion, which then prompts me being even more up front that one’s opponents having made said accusation will engage in poisoning every well they can – though no evidence supports it. Another common police tactic. When a clear case of wrong doing or error — make the issue the person – smoke screening If there is any hint of duplicity, i lay that at the prosecutors door. this was not a very complicated case.

    A young man is walking home, he is subsequently stalked by an unknown person. He attempts to avoid said person . He is unable to do so. His language is all language that clearly i8s indicative person stalking him is a threat. For reasons unknown, he opts to confront his stalker. A struggle ensues. in which the victim of a stalking incident is shot and killed.

    The crime scene gymnastics report is wholly of no value to that case. The events were set in motion by the adult, instigated by the adult and pressed by the adult. Who at no time indicated who he was or why he was stalking. Under normal circumstances considering the environment – the young man’s conduct is consistent with reasonable choices, even if one disagrees with the choices made. They are not beyond reason.

    The adult is responsible for causing the incident from start to finish and did so without warrant.

  75. @EliteCommInc.

    The events were set in motion by a punk that was casing houses, and a HOA leader, and law abiding citizen that didn’t understand the world we live in now. He had been suspended three times for drugs, truancy and carrying burglary tools, and that just the crap we know of because most of the rest was probably shit canned so it wouldn’t show him in a negative light. It’s been made crystal clear, they are to be left alone no matter what they’re doing, up to and including burning cities, car jacking the innocent and the daily smash and grabs. The fact that you try and explain away the cut and blood on the back of his head is proof of what I accused you of already, being a liar. The cut on the back of his head is the reason he’s not in prison right now, and showed that he used restraint before electing to use deadly force. Something the jury decided was reasonable considering the evidence from the crime. Florida is a stand your ground state and if the little angel that you’re pathetically trying to argue for hadn’t jumped ole Georgie and started bashing his head on concrete this whole thing would’ve probably ended with the him being returned to his worthless sperm donor, intact and still breathing. But we’ll never know because like most NAPA’s he let his 900 cc brain talk him into something he thought would be fun and a cool story to tell his homies.

  76. “The events were set in motion by a punk that was casing houses, and a HOA leader, and law abiding citizen that didn’t understand the world we live in now. He had been suspended three times for drugs, truancy and carrying burglary tools, and that just the crap we know of because most of the rest was probably shit canned so it wouldn’t show him in a negative light.”

    excuse me. I am going to avoid the obvious bait and switch here.

    The adult in question knew absolutely nothing about this young man’s life. He simply saw a young man who happened to be black walking (shuffling i9n your parlance) in the complex. That young man did nothing that was indicative that he was engaged in a crime.

    Now I have already granted out there is nothing wrong with the adults suspicions – he is entitled to them despite nothing about the young man’s conduct that warranted the same. His call to police unwarranted, but nothing of an issue.

    The problem begins with the stalking. that’s it. Despite the admonition by law enforcement not to f0ollow . . he does so anyway. The only person that night acting in a suspicious manner was the adult who is following a teenage in a dimly lit apartment complex.

    i am x years old, i walk with a pole of sorts and i say for certain, i react to anyone popping out of the darkness. Restraint has prevented more than one female or male jogger coming out of nowhere from the shadows from having a serious altercation. A teen male being stalked. Anyone could or would reasonably conclude out of fear whoever was following them was a “creepy guy” is absolutely easy to comprehend. And that they were at threat.

    Do i take my pole at the ready and swing it at whatever just popped out the darkness two feet away from, completely unheard or do i risk vital seconds of self defense not break some poor joggers head or legs in self defense. I usually wait . . . but suppose i was not lit up like a lighthouse. Suppose I am dark to dark . . . how would that change my response.

    Here a kid is being followed by some man, regardless of attempts to avoid the man , , the man follows. That is the suspicious conduct. In this young man’s mind he is being threatened — he chooses to turn his defense into an offences in defense of himself against an aggressor/stalker.

    Again, this is not complicated. I have said nothing about the anyone’s character. It simply is not a factor in this incident. I have explained away nothing. I do however point out that the one aspect of the “police analysis” that you are relying on is does not support that the adults’ head was treated in the manner described by the adult. That is not me. That is the report.

    You are again incorrect, i do not change the scenario that the young man ambushed his stalker in a confrontation – who through the first punch is completely irrelevant, a kid confronted some guy he thought was creepy because he was stalking him — absolutely reasonable.

    “creepy”

    is a fear response term and in this instance if anything is clear the young man in question reacted out fear as one would expect from any person who chose to either flee or fight. He chose to fight a perfectly reasonable choice, even if i may disagree with the choice made. The only crime that night in my view

    stalking and manslaughter by the adult.

    I do appreciate you making my point that when all else fails — muddy tyhe issue with irrelevant material in this case past history —

    which the adult had no clue about nor saw evidence of that night.

  77. The adult in question knew absolutely nothing about this young man’s life. He simply saw a young man who happened to be black walking (shuffling i9n your parlance) in the complex. That young man did nothing that was indicative that he was engaged in a crime.

    Of course, they’re never doing anything wrong, and are accountable for nothing. Thanks again for reminding me of that. I’ll digress back to the jury verdict and the picture of the back of ole Georgie’s head that you seem to think was a reasonable response to not being attacked by “the adult.” Maybe if this kid had been taught to respect elders and showed even a shred of humility during this event it could have been handled in a civilized manner. But as you’ve chosen yet again to point out in your latest novel, it was all the adult’s fault for doing something that was far more reasonable than the kid who doubled back and confronted Zimmerman. He was looking to kick some ass, and it cost him his life. And again I digress back the 900cc brain comment. Stupid people that make stupid decisions often win stupid prizes. As I said earlier that my policy is to avoid these things whenever possible is the only stupid thing Zimmerman did that night. If there is any accountability on his end it was him thinking it wise to have done anything other than call 911.

  78. Jack P says:

    Three feral thugs murdered a white boy in Akron recently. They continued to stomp and kick him after he was beaten unconscious. They’re facing mostly misdemeanors – the worst might get a few years behind bars.

    Meanwhile, in Georgia, a criminal thug was killed in self defense by three white men. All the white men are going to prison for life, including one who was just videotaping. They were convicted by a mostly white jury in the DEEP SOUTH.

    What are we willing to do about this? Not then, but now?

  79. “Of course, they’re never doing anything wrong, and are accountable for nothing. Thanks again for reminding me of that. I’ll digress back to the jury verdict and the picture of the back of ole Georgie’s head that you seem to think was a reasonable response to not being attacked by “the adult.” Maybe if this kid had been taught to respect elders and showed even a shred of humility during this event it could have been handled in a civilized manner.”

    I am unclear what you are on about. I make no claims about anyone doing or not doing anything beyond the scope of that evening.

    My comments regarding the head to concrete claim are rebutted by the “police analysis” which you interjected earlier in the discussion. You claimed that this is the key factor and now you seem to want ignore the fact that the police report does not corroborate the claim, you switch the matter to the jury. As i indicated previously, i make no arguments regarding what the jury chose to use. My only comment on that matter is to the police report, which challenges description of the head banging made by the adult. Who instigated the incident by stalking.

    Based on events, the young man was actually looking to avoid a conflict. Failing that he defended himself.

    Stalking anyone you don’t know for any reason and never identifying yourself — would make you a threat to that person.

  80. Based on events, the young man was actually looking to avoid a conflict. Failing that he defended himself.

    Another bald faced lie. Had he wanted to avoid the conflict all he had to do was run away. George Zimmerman at the time was 5’7″ and weighed 185 to 190lbs. Martin was a lean kid that was 5’11” tall and weighed 160lbs. Zimmerman couldn’t have caught him with a hot shot of adrenaline. Please just shut up and stop lying for this dead punk. You’re making a fool of yourself with the dishonesty.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  81. anarchyst says:
    @Philmuhcrevis

    Thank you for your concise responses to EliteCommInc.
    However, you are wasting your time attempting to have EliteCommInc. make sense. His ramblings are right out of his IDF Unit 8200 cubicle in tel aviv or out of his mom’s basement. He is not worth responding to…
    In the trayvon martin case, Zimmerman would not have been charged but for the (fake) media outcry over “poor little trayvon martin”. Initially, the prosecutor refused to indict.
    Zimmerman should have gotten a medal for “taking out the garbage”.
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  82. “Another bald faced lie. Had he wanted to avoid the conflict all he had to do was run away.”

    I beg your pardon. He evaded the gentleman following him to no avail. Given that he could reasonably conclude hey, the “creepy guy” is not leaving me alone, he is after me . . . and chose to confront. The fact that you or anyone else thinks that he must run away after being stalked is just a strange notion. He had committed no crime. Did not appear to be intending to commit a crime. He was just walking. The idea that he had to go the extra mile in order to protect himself or else he is guilty of some unknown imagined crime or made up crime makes absolutely no sense. The expectation that he has to exercise every option in order to avoid being stalked by some guy in the dark and now has to result to some drastic move such as running —

    which would only further instigate the stalker because now the intended target is running . . . must be guilty of something. You and others are placing this kid in some kind of catch-22 in which his every choice makes him suspect — when he is fact not guilty and doing nothing that suspicious. afterall the gentleman in question blew off police admonitions to stop, why would running end the matter. Running — really!!!!

    Oyyyyyy

    What a ridiculous suggestion. And while the choice to run seems benign and wise — it only reinforces the incorrect conclusions and based on what we know the stalker would run after him. The notion is completely beyond the pale — but that s the point — to create scenarios in which every choice only reinforces suspicions. That is why you and others load up accusations, that in your minds only reinforces your imagined wrong. I have not lied or mislead, but saying it about every point you lose and you have lost on multiple fronts only makes you more adamant that I am lying. Either runs away or I am lying. How about he simply makes attempts to avoid —

    That he must run away or else is completely backwards to the stand your ground rule. When he confronted he was standing his ground. He is the innocent party here.

    So kids have to always run away from their stalkers or they deserve to be shot. They are outlawed from standing their ground to confront. It is not the neighborhood watch adult who should know better and whose poor choices created the scenario — it’s the teen age kid.

    laughing and O

    Oyyyy veh! and

    good golly miss molly

    Okay I get it. In this instance the kid should have been the adult and the adult has the decision making skills of a child. But then what would expect from people who think its fine for an adult male to stalk some kid in the evening without ever saying who he was . . . these same people contend that running away was the solution — and that doing so in the complex he is unfamiliar with would sure granted him escape. Uhhh, no . . . just a maybe. What gave him escape was to do the unexpected and that was to circle back to confront. I may have made a different choice as would you — but his choice was absolutely a normal response — ooohhhh wait, he has to think about the grown child stalking him and make an adult decision —

    as if choosing to confront isn’t adult.

    Got it.

    You first you declare the police report is the key. And when the police report contradicts your claims and the adult in question, suddenly, no it’s the jury. Well, engaging your political hopscotch is healthy and theraputive.

    I think you and those who agree with you should stick name calling and false accusations.

    ————

    The size of the people in question here is simply irrelevant. A young man was being stalked — size shape skin color — is completely irrelevant.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  83. @EliteCommInc.

    Lol. Another novel that says nothing.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  84. @anarchyst

    Initially, the prosecutor refused to indict.
    Zimmerman should have gotten a medal for “taking out the garbage”.

    Yep, just like the Arbrey case, until they went prosecutor shopping to appease the Sharpton’s and Jackson’s

  85. anonymous[389] • Disclaimer says:

    Hood wrote:

    Buchanan “launched two populist challenges to George H.W. Bush, promoting immigration control, English as the official language, noninterventionism, opposition to free trade, and ending affirmative action.”

    Speaking of George HW Bush, he was the president who signed the Immigration Act of 1990 into law despite it not having passed Congress with a veto-proof majority. The Immigration Act of 1990 basically put the Immigration Act of 1965 on steriods by roughly doubling legal immigration and creating both the diversity visa lottery and the HB1 visa. Any guesses as to the only 2 states where both US Senators voted against the Immigation Act of 1990? Ultra-conservative AL and supposedly “wacky” CA. Someone should do a statistical analysis of the demographic effects of the 1990 Act alone, since it was enacted by a president who conservatives wrongly thought was on their side and would halt any further push to expand the Leftist revoultion that began in the 1960s. That makes it all the more egregious than the 1965 Act IMO.

    Also:

    “In 1994, California voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 187, to end public education and benefits for illegal immigrants — only to see its provisions gutted by judges.”

    The sad, pathetic and outragous story of Proposition 187 is as follows:
    This measure, among other things, would have denied non-emergency gov’t benefits and free schooling to illegal aliens and passed with over 59% of the vote. Within days foreign-born attorney Peter Schey, the self-described son of a Jewish communist, got a Jimmy Carter appointed district judge, Mariana Pfaelzer Rothman to issue an injunction against its implementation. Then as a delaying she waited an unprecented three years before finally declaring the act “unconstitutional” (surprise, surprise!!). Shortly thereafter now recalled/disgraced fmr. governor Grey Davis took over and in collusion with the president of Mexico had the Act dismanted and thus dropped any futher appeals.

  86. ““In 1994, California voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 187, to end public education and benefits for illegal immigrants — only to see its provisions gutted by judges.”

    Another slice of healthy legislation that failed because . . .

    Texans mislead Sen Barbara Jordan, who staunch support for denying illegal immigrants because they undermined work and the economy of US citizens. They assured her that the legislation and the advocacy in the supreme would be limited . . . another kindly woman in Congress set aside everything the evidence told her about easing immigration and in lickity split time Texans were before the Supreme Court contending that the US Constitutionally bound to educate illegals.

    Hmmm I wonder if those advocating leading the way with these damaging policies are all from the same demographic . . .

    Whites are repeatedly at the forefront of these undermining policies. Ohhh let’s skip the hoola hooop Jews did it. It’s liberal and conservative and of that band of quagmire clan of no borders and let’s legalize all drugs libertarians —

    ——————————

    “Yep, just like the Arbrey case, until they went prosecutor shopping to appease the Sharpton’s and Jackson’s”

    No and not at all,

    Until it was abundantly clear that what the gentleman claimed happened and the warrant for it were turned upside down on its head.

  87. Dan-0-lee says:

    “Whites are repeatedly at the forefront of these undermining policies. Ohhh let’s skip the hoola hooop Jews did it.”

    Yes, activist Whites whose first allegiance is not necessarily to the red, white and blue but to a flag of yellow and white. People who are using their control of America’s legislative system to destroy the American Republic.

    Is it in the interest of the Vatican papacy for America to be a self-confident protestant nation? I don’t think so.

  88. @gutta percha

    That, and the unpopularity of Bush Sr., was exactly how the Dems managed to push the GOP out of the running for the foreseeable future. They took the law & order vote, a traditional winner for the GOP, and in return the GOP foolishly tried to take the victim vote via “compassionate conservatism” which continues to hobble the party to this day. The Dems benefited so much that even the presidency of Bush Jr ultimately worked in their favor, and beneath the staged squabbles it’s been a uniparty system ever since.

  89. “Is it in the interest of the Vatican papacy for America to be a self-confident protestant nation?”

    Well i think i agree. Immediately after 9/11 the US should placed a moratorium on all immigration.

    The previous president should have built a serious wall implemented the various electronic protocols, cleared government contracts of illegal immigrants, ended any and all welfare to illegal immigrants in three months, ceased funding think tanks and the like that supported illegal immigrants, including La Raza . . .

    Set about either rebuilding city infrastructure or expanding private business to hire more inner city dwellers . . . . and while absolutely understand the animosity, sparring should have come second to policy — maybe third . . .

    Absolute applause for his stance on murdering children in the womb.

  90. The conservatives didn’t stop it bc they have their heads so far up Israel’s ass, which is who really wants to make Whites a minority in America. A minority in the very country Whites fought for, conquered and maintained.

    The Conservatives practically worship the jews and THAT’S the problem. At this point I really do wonder which country and ppl they consider paramount to preserving, Israel’s or America’s?

  91. “In 2000, journalists Peter Brimelow and Steve Sailer had noted on their VDARE.com web page that discussion of IQ and race had actually become more difficult as the 1990s progressed. ”

    Unfortunately under scrutiny the Bell Curve was found flawed.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1997/01/the-bell-curve-flattened.html

    https://reason.com/1995/03/01/cracked-bell/

    • Troll: Eric Novak
  92. Will Manfred the Germinator keep
    the peace at least in Jewmurica?

    https://www.veed.io/view/f1874839-3674-4246-8af9-4c674efd12a8

    https://de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Manfred_Gilow?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

    A sick Jew who calls himself “The
    People Of Hawkins TX” has so far
    failed to stop him. He found only 12
    laughable signers for his “petition”.

    https://www.change.org/p/hawkins-tx-city-council-terminate-hawkins-police-chief-manfred-gilow

  93. tanabear says:

    The 1990s was the decade between the end of the Cold War and the start of the War on Terror. Race dominated the conversation in the 1990s. Anyone who doesn’t know this is historically illiterate. President Clinton even commissioned a dialogue on race.

    President Clinton’s Initiative on Race
    On June 14, 1997, President William (Bill) Jefferson Clinton proclaimed, “One America in the 21st Century: The President’s Initiative on Race.” The 15-month initiative was a core component in President Clinton’s effort to transform the United States into a country that embraces diversity and lives in harmony. Racial reconciliation, through assembling people from diverse backgrounds and encouraging dialogue throughout the nation, was intended to assist in lessening racial and ethnic divisions wherever they existed in the country. Ultimately, Clinton pledged the initiative would help to “find, develop, and recommend…concrete solutions to our problems— solutions that will involve all of us in government, business, communities, and as individual citizens.”

    https://clintonwhitehouse3.archives.gov/Initiatives/OneAmerica/transcri.html

    I am convinced, based on a rich lifetime of friendships and common endeavors with people of different races, that the American people will find out they have a lot more in common than they think they do.”
    President Clinton

    It wasn’t true then and it certainly isn’t true now.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  94. aandrews says:

    Excellent essay. It’s all about to break, though, I think.



    Video Link
    Timestamp 35:00 – 37:51

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
  95. The US was always going to fall into the abyss once its founders gave citizenship to the (((enemies of all mankind))), which no other country did at the time. Any subsequent period of apparent placidity was a delusion. In the 1950s, for instance, the enemy was actively plotting against Whites and Grandpa Eisenhower had Little Rock’s Central High School negrified at gunpoint.

    The US must be scrapped and a new society, an exclusively White Christian one, founded in its place.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  96. @Priss Factor

    Absolutely right about classic rock, which I miss (but at least I got to write novels featuring it! https://omegabooksnet.com). Yep, that’s when rap (esp. gangsta, which is degrading for sure) began to take over. Also right about anti-war left….died in the 90s. Thanks for the comment.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  97. Impotent whining that doesn’t name the jew. The author is a useless phony no better than the Con Inc scum he pretends to criticize.

  98. IronForge says:

    Too Late.

    Murica H-1b’d, NAFTA’d, Off-Shored Engineering/Mfg/Tech Jobs.

    MIC/PetroUSD/Legal/Healthcare/Finance, Plutarchy/Oligarchy, Wars/Sanctions/”FreeTrade Exploitation”/Labor Arbitrage are what’re holding up the Hegemon.

    Thanks to the PetroUSD, MIC, and Corporates – the Hegemon will have plenty of G7/G20/3rdWorld to Feed Upon.
    *****

    As for Immigration and Demographics – those are done for and already in OpenBorders/Camp of the Saints Scenarios.

    In the USA,

    Annual White Births outnumber Hispanic Births. However, White_Births+Immigration are outnumbered by Hispanic_Births+Legal/Illegal_Immigration

    Immigrants may be pregnant(per the Anchor-Baby/Birthright SocialSecurity Bennies), may soon procreate, or grow up in a few years then procreate children – before “Newly Birthed” Children are able to procreate.

    I don’t have any growth rate stats; but in the not too distant future, Hispanic_Births by themselves WILL surpass White_Births.

    Murica have already crossed the Point of No Return. It will be a matter of time until we see more State/County Birth Rates express the Shift.

    Here’s an example using today’s trends – when California Governor Newsome was subjected to a Recall Election – only Counties that had absolute White Majorities (50+% of Population) in the Northern parts of the State – succeeded in Voting “For” the Recall.

  99. @Feryl

    Though some 90s rock was okay (such as Green Day, Oasis, Linkin Park, Sound Garden and a few others), grunge made me cringe…esp. Drowning Pool’s “let the bodies hit the floor” crapola! And Limp Bizkit? Yikes! And “Rage Against the Machine” and “Foo Fighters”….they, along with rap and it’s owners (the music moguls) destroyed classic rock on purpose…and yes, race has something to do with it. Last era of classic rock was the 80s and early 90s.

    • Agree: Detroit Refugee
  100. Thirdtwin says:

    Black Spring Break metastasized into Freaknik and similar catastrophes in the 1990s. I don’t know what Matt Walsh was smoking back then, but it must have been potent.

  101. @Priss Factor

    Rock experienced another peak, albeit its last, in the 1990s. Every big city had a large alt rock scene. This will almost certainly never happen again.

  102. @AceDeuce

    Well said, friend!

    • Thanks: AceDeuce
  103. Despite President Ronald Reagan’s 1996 amnesty for illegal immigrants

    nitpick ON\ Reagan was POTUS until 1990 so such an amnesty in 1996 is unlikely \nitpick OFF

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  104. @Occasional lurker

    He was certainly no worse than Bush and Biden. Also no less qualified.

    No worse than Bush and Biden? Wow, what an epitaph that will make. Right up there with “no smellier than cat-shit in a Mississippi summer breeze.”

    Bush and Biden combine to compose a fairly low bar. It’s bears note that you’re comparing your star negro to a low-IQ, bought-off scion of an entitled, money-grubbing semblance of a political dynasty and a senile, political hack who was sub-mediocre at his peak.

    Yay, Obama, you’re on a par with the white man’s detritus! Collect your prize on the way out.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  105. A note on OJ: there is a theory that he took the rap for his son, a recovering drug addict who was prone to violence.

    As for the increase in racial tension: we all know there is a certain privileged group in America, that once upon a time could claim to be part of the downtrodden minorities, fighting for a better future. They could make some noise, but not too much. Now this group is very close to ALL the levers of power, in direct control of quite a few. They can no longer realistically claim to be fighting for a fair deal in a monolithic WASP society. So the RACISM scam is the only weapon they have to stop everyone noticing and talking about their dominance. That’s why it’s practically all we hear about.

  106. Conservatives should be asking why Republicans didn’t end all this [fake colorblind] nonsense when they could have.

    It was already far too late in the 90’s to stop America’s multicultural slide. Pat Buchanan did his best to inform and warn America but he was not only smeared and defamed non-stop by the Left (and the MSM), but he was largely denounced and abandoned by ‘moderate and mainstream’ conservatives throughout his Presidential bids.

    Why?

    Because elite taste-makers claimed that Buchanan was ‘too polarizing’ (i,e., too honest). It turns out that euphemism, cant, and deference have become essential qualities for all elected ‘leaders’. Some democracy.

    Indeed, by the 90’s, the incoherent myth of racial equality was already etched in stone. Well before Clinton’s narrow 1992 election win, White unity and cohesion (once considered normal and natural) were commonly depicted (on TV, film and in contemporary literature) as the equivalent of Naziism or some unprovoked attack (on ‘innocent Blacks’ of course) by the KKK.

    Most of the manufactured (((liberal))) attitudes that now haunt and undermine White America today were fully in place by the 90’s. I was there. I saw it coming. I would say that, since the 70s, Whites in America have had absolutely no voice for their collective political interests as a people.

    The insidious power of mass media has made (White) Americans timid, sheepish, guilt-ridden, and scared. This phenomenon is not new.

    The subversive impact of ‘political correctness’ has been slowly ramping up since WWII. Ironically, that immensely catastrophic (and unnecessary) war marked the (unheralded) defeat for white European interests worldwide.

    The defeat of the Axis powers has been hailed as a ‘victory for democracy’ by virtually all modern filmmakers, Party pundits, editorialists, and public education propagandists. These (((liberal))) sentiments emerged and hardened alongside numerous feel-good (but unpopular) rulings from the SCOTUS following WWII. Incredibly, just a handful of Supreme Court decisions have effectively terminated ‘Free Association’ in America in the name of ‘civil rights’ and ‘living up to the 14th Amendment’. Freedom is slowing being chipped away.

    Since these landmark rulings (including Brown v Board of Education), (White) racism has gradually become viewed as America’s greatest evil; even though our racially-diverse, polyglot country may now qualify as the fairest and most integrated civilization in human history. How strange.

    With that in mind, the case can be made that America’s last great, decade was the 50’s and maybe the 60’s–though that era (late 60’s) was when the (((Left))) finally assumed full control of American culture. (And they’ve been dishing it out ever since.)

    America’s downhill slide has been underway at least since Shelly v Kraemer (1948), if not well before. Some claim it started with Lincoln’s refusal to allow the Confederate states to peacefully secede.

    PS- Mr. Hood (a talented protege of Jared Taylor’s) cites a number of important books about race that were published in the 90s. Yet he left out Kevin MacDonald’s ‘The Culture of Critique’ (as well as MacDonald’s two preceding books on Jews and their oversized impact on American civilization.)

    One wonders:

    Gee. Did he forget?

  107. Let us remember that in the 90s the old American elite thought of establishing responsible wealth by giving opportunity to others, and was swept away by a new elite of unscrupulous young people with infinite greed.

  108. @EliteCommInc.

    > A young man is walking home, he is subsequently stalked by an unknown person.

    This was not his home. He was visiting his father within a gated community park. I can remember when as a kid in the 1970s I visited my father in the place called Viking Village in Acton, Massachusetts. One of the first things he told me was “If you see somebody don’t start running away, tell them that you’re with me and I’m your father.” It’s not that he was afraid that anyone would shoot me. But the thought was that I might seem like an intruder if I was running around unaccompanied by a resident. Instead, I got introduced to everyone gradually. There may have been s0me complaints about my bratty behavior, but everyone knew that I was visiting a father who was a resident.

    If Tracy Martin had given his son some commonsense talk, then this whole thing might have been avoided. George Zimmerman had started acting as a night watchman because there had been some break-ins at the park. Late at night, Zimmerman sees someone who was clearly not a resident of the park wandering around the park, with signs that he was drugged up and tipsy. Zimmerman was certainly within his rights to follow this non-resident and attempt to find out what he was doing in their park.

    Walking around within a gated community park where you are not a resident is different from walking along a general highway. The general area is public domain, but the park is not. If you’re invited into such a park by a resident, then you have an obligation to remember protocols as a guest. Trayvon Martin was never taught any of this by his lousy parents.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  109. @That Would Be Telling

    Romney was just someone they put in to give the illusion of choice. Our masters had their boy in already and didn’t want him to leave. Elections are rigged in many ways. There is no real opposition in DC to the Davos crowd. Most conservative commentators are false as well. Look at Fox, as they still harp on Jan 6, when Biden and co are spending hundreds of billions on Ukraine, bankrupting the country even faster. Fox News is useless and a major distraction operation. I miss the Lori Dhue era. She was hot and actually had brains. The females at Fox now come off as dumb sorority girls. No serious news is allowed anymore.

  110. ‘This was not his home. He was visiting his father within a gated community park. I can remember when as a kid in the 1970s I visited my father in the place called Viking Village in Acton, Massachusetts. One of the first things he told me was “If you see somebody don’t start running away, tell them that you’re with me and I’m your father.” It’s not that he was afraid that anyone would shoot me.”

    As I have previously noted the [problem here is not the adults suspicions but his conduct. Ge was not in uniform. Nothing identified him as anything other than a guy stalking a kid, at night. Th3 adult never does anything that might alleviate the young man’s suspicions. He was did not run away from the asult. He sought to avoid him. After failing to do that, he confronted him – period. This has nothing tp do with respect. The adult’s behaviors was utterly suspect.

    Laughing : Special note: many here have posited he should have run away — so your father’s advice is at odds with your fellow defenders of the adult.

    The police say don’t follow . . . the adult does anyway.

    He is walking home. his father’s house is is home. but let’s say he wasn’t walking home. So what walking is not a crime. Wandering around is not a crime. Even running around is not a crime.

    The young man has evert reas9on to be frightened. I would be, Anyone would or could be reasonably suspicious about the adults conduct. As i recall the adult was not even on duty. Everything about his conduct, except calling police, was inciteful.

    “The general area is public domain, but the park is not. If you’re invited into such a park by a resident, then you have an obligation to remember protocols as a guest. Trayvon Martin was never taught any of this by his lousy parents.”

    I gave no idea about his parents parenting skills. I do know that they had nothing to do with the incident in question. It was not5 faulty parenting skills that caused a an adult male to follow a young man at without ever identifying himself. This was not kid looking for a fight. He was a kid talking with his friend, who’s stroll was interrupted by some

    “creepy guy”

    There is no violation of anyone’s protocols, , or apartment complex etiquette, It could have been attilla the hun and the adult in question would soley be responsible for the events that night. This is not a complicated case. There’s no real mysteries toi be u7raveled that change the nature of events. Whether intentional or unintentional, the adult set the stage and the invents by his conduct. Stalking someone at night, is inciteful and provocative.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  111. Che Guava says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Wow! EliteC, your comments usually make some sense, but the amount of writing errors in that one makes at least a third incomprehensible.

  112. For anyone with eyes to see, a huge portion of the black population is completely dysfunctional and violent to boot. They get away with this due to the legal system protecting them from any serious repercussions. Although the violent and dumb as a stump blacks are the most visible symptom of the problem, they are not the problem itself.

    The problem is that the laws have disarmed the decent law abiding people and the general population has done nothing about the laws systematically taking away their constitutionally protected self defense rights. If people had the right to carry, lots of criminals of every race would be dead right now. The criminal justice system should be renamed the criminal protection racket since that’s what it actually does.

    If the business owners that had their buildings torched weren’t more afraid of the cops than the antifa and blm thugs, they would have shotgunned the first POS that threw a rock through their window. That rock eventually led to their building being set on fire. The blacks may be symbolic of the crime problem, but they continue to exist as violent predators due to the laws that purposely encourage their violence and the oppression of the decent people of all races and creeds in the society.

    There are a few hundred million decent people in the US. There are a few tens of millions of human trash that cause all the trouble, not just in crime but also resources they consume without working for them ultimately supplied by the working man or woman. There are a few million cops and soldier Judas types that work to suppress the decent folks. Consider the numbers. If the decent people got their guns and demanded their natural rights, there is no opposing force strong enough to stop them. The guns should be brandished but not used during a nationwide shut down of every business as the working man revolts.

    There’s no law that says you must show up for work. You can sit on your ass and watch the economy implode on TV. There’s not a damned thing anyone can do to prevent you from sitting quietly in your home. The result is the economy collapses, the Dollar dies and the people regain control. The economy is dead anyway and the dollar is going to die anyway, so the people need to gain the control over how and when it happens. The Fed Gov dies as the dollar dies and the bulk of the oppression of the decent people dies with it.

    The threat of violence by gov’t goons is what’s keeping you down. Use the threat of violence and peaceful action to emancipate yourselves.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  113. @Priss Factor

    That was 1986. I wonder if he cut a deal.

    There’s no need to wonder. The deal with the democrats was that there was to be SERIOUS border enforcement implemented, and this was a 1-time 1 million person “amnesty” – that turned into over 3 million – for the purposes of said deal and as a gesture of goodwill. The D’s reneged, as anyone but Ronald Reagan would have expected.

    Funny thing is, President Reagan was wise enough not to trust the Commie USSR (his “trust, but verify” basically meant “don’t trust”, but he trusted the Democrat Party on this and one other major deal. The 2nd was the increase in the defense budget to win the Cold War – which it did – in return for cuts in domestic spending. Te latter didn’t happen, and deficits ballooned ever since …

    The 1986 Amnesty was Ronald Reagan’s biggest regret. That post is mostly one big excerpt from the writing of Ed Meese.

  114. Che Guava says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    NPC = non-player character

    Video-game term, mainly from on-line multiplayer games, meaning the automata in the game.

  115. anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emma S.

    ben shipiro doesn’t care about the browning of America because benji’s real country keeps blacks out, except as select menial laborers. Ask the African jews who tried to emigrate to Israel how deeply the jews care about the “browning” of the apartheid state. Shitpiro has talked out of both sides of his mouth his entire career. It shows how cucked the United States is that a sayanim traitor like this has analingus performed on him by slavish white male followers. And a comment on the 1990s as a whole, or at least post-1992: it’s no surprise that anti-white male misandry exploded in the 1990s, because it was under Clinton that the jews gained dominant and unchallenged control over America. They either threatened Billy Boy, or they leveraged his history of raping women to control the office of the presidency.

  116. I ask everyone to view the video below. Ask yourself if being fired on by some POS doesn’t give you the natural right of self defense to permanently neutralize the threat. Then ask yourself if you did what the cop did would you get off.

  117. anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Next time, speak English, not ebonics. That was some of the most tangled “writing” I’ve seen in my life. But nice try, simian.

  118. Anonymous[233] • Disclaimer says:

    The Jew has been softening up any and all opposition to the question of inferiority of minorities in the American society by his sole possession of the financial cudgel and his ruthless use of it to achieve his goal by the backdoor to gain control of the direction in which he alone is going to determine the fate of the nation irrespective of who is in the majority and Whites themselves are to blame for the biggest blunder of all times.

  119. @EliteCommInc.

    If you disagree, TWBT, state your argument. Calling someone a troll is juvenile nonsense.

    • Replies: @Corrupt
  120. anonymous[769] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Caruso

    It says something about the depravity of the jew that he/she/it has worked so hard to destroy the one country that allowed jews in through the front door, and gave jews opportunities no other nation would. America did the shitraelis a solid, and their quintessential response was to be the termites in the house bringing the walls down. That immigration policy error, in conjunction with having an unprincipled and weak native political class, meant the end of America.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Ray Caruso
  121. Miro23 says:

    The political and demographic threats are worse than ever. Our advantage is that fewer have any illusions about what is at stake. Let’s hope Mr. Walsh and others catch up.

    Hoping and wishing don’t come into it. The only way to deal with the US Neo-Bolsheviks is to tackle them head on with the arrest of everyone in government, FBI, CIA etc. involved with 9/11. Then start the questioning/ cross checking, plea bargaining etc. and put the results on national media. The US Army need to take the initiative and use military courts.

    Yes, it’s a military coup – or more correctly a counter-coup.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  122. anonymous[925] • Disclaimer says:
    @Philmuhcrevis

    ELiteCommInc. is a moron. Nothing but jibberish in every post.

  123. With her best pantsuit on
    Nancy went to Taiwan
    The impact is enduring
    Cuz of tiddies so alluring

    • Replies: @Anon
  124. Emslander says:

    The first business of any new Republican majority is to set national voting standards (citizenship) and create a registration and identification system for voting in federal elections. That would bring on the needed renaissance.

    The FIRST business. Tie it to Biden’s security appropriation.

    • LOL: RoatanBill
  125. What the 1990s may have really been was the last chance to stop multiculturalism.

    While Bill Clinton was president? Lol.

  126. @Philmuhcrevis

    You’ve explained the truth of the matter, as best as you could, Phil. With this Elite Commie guy, I’m about at the point I’ve been for a long time with the commenter Corvinus – I’m not just skipping his comments but also the REPLIES TO his comments, as it’s such a waste of time – for you and me.

    I hope you don’t take offense at this. I appreciate your bringing up the sick result of the Arbery case too – it’s even more important, IMO. The Elites don’t want us to be able to defend ourselves. The Glynn County case is a perfect example of how they are trying to scare us into becoming sheep.

    [EDIT:] Just looking ahead, I see that there’s lots more from this moron. Good, as obsessive as I am about finishing threads, this is saving me some time!

    • Thanks: PhilMuhCrevis
  127. @EliteCommInc.

    Bruh.. you are mixing jews with Europeans.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Gillispie
  128. @Rich

    Yes, I remember that black football player, later congressman. Can’t remember his name. He also had influence over Newt Gingrich on keeping Affirmative Action.

    • Replies: @Reverend Goody
  129. geokat62 says:
    @Rich

    The transformation of the country into a Latin American country all comes down to wages.

    It’s because of wages, goy! We had absolutely nothing to do with it… I promise.

    ‘Let Us Open Again the Gates’; A congressman says that we need, and can absorb, ten million immigrants within the next twenty years. ‘Let Us Open Again the Gates’ by Jacob K. Javits (July 8, 1951)

    https://www.nytimes.com/1951/07/08/archives/let-us-open-again-the-gates-a-congressman-says-that-we-need-and-can.html

  130. @Miro23

    The US military and the intel agencies are the deep state. The US has been a soft military dictatorship since JFK got whacked. Why do you think that the military can’t account for \$21 Trillion and no one in congress is concerned about that? Why do you think congress keeps pouring currency down a rat hole of a military that hasn’t won a war since Vietnam? Why do you think congress appropriates more funds than are requested?

    The military and the intel agencies have the dirt on every POS that gets elected.

    • Replies: @MGB777
    , @Miro23
  131. @Bill Miller

    Reagan’s presidency ended in January 1989, not 1990.

    • Replies: @Bill Miller
  132. @RoatanBill

    Intriguing, but how does one intentionally sit at home and use one’s savings and go into abject poverty, then homelessness and hence filth and physical danger … when we have children?

    Also, why would you waste your life and live destitute as a protest or resistance? people who have that bleak a view of the USA and its future, should just get the Hell out of the country already and live, as you have done. Before retirement, if it’s affordable at all.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  133. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Democracy is not a system that rewards those who tell the truth. Many people thought Mr. Buchanan sounded mean.

    Saying “no” to a spoiled child’s demands for more, more, more is always “mean,” in the child’s telling.

    America’s problem is that the stunted child neocons now rule the right and the left, and as entitled “chosenites,” they don’t like to be told “no.” They’re royalty, doncha know?

    So when they do crimes like 9/11 and wars on “Islamofascism” and Plandemics, the other children follow the potentates. That’s what Anglo-Zionist-Bolsheviks call “democracy,” but what the rest of the world calls kosher gangsterism. But kosher gangsterism eventually eats its own, as Trump is finding out.

    The Zionist Comintern always was a walking, breathing, wheezing contradiction destined to crumble. In Racist Marxist Israel, you see its endpoint. In America, you see the Golem ((Jew)) stooge following his Master over the cliff.

  134. Anon[405] • Disclaimer says:
    @spacewonderer

    OK, I’ll play along.

    Don’t think I need to mention
    That Old Nancy likes attention
    Even Xi could not ignore
    Her tiddies were to die for.

  135. MGB777 says:

    America should collapse. It has been at war my whole life. Chewing through resources and exhausting any moral high-ground it might have had. Sodomizing Gadaffi to death with a knife and laughing about it, destroying Afghanistan and running away like cowards, imprisoning the first amendment (Assange) and justifying endless terrorism to promote “democracy” which is simply a system to dupe the 90% of dopes into legitimizing whatever they do. If America was anything like what it was supposed to be, it might be worth saving, but it is standing in the way of real freedom.

  136. MGB777 says:
    @RoatanBill

    They lost Vietnam. Unless “win” means inflict the most damage/destruction/hatred/war crimes.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  137. @That Would Be Telling

    George Zimmerman and his neighbors have the same problem as the McMichaels and their neighbors: they have some money and a mortgage as opposed to rent, but not nearly enough money to price away the riffraff like Trayvon Martin and Ahrmed Robbery. So they handle things as best they can, sometimes in a not ideal way, and they can’t afford to hire Securitas.

    All the plebeians can hope for is national borders and a police force that looks like them and will defend the civil order. America is no longer a good place to be a plebeian.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Reverend Goody
  138. @RadicalCenter

    A 30 day work stoppage in the US would crush what’s left of the economy. If you can’t hold out for 30 days, then you’re dead already and don’t realize it.

    The US economy is failing. The dollar is being shunned more and more and its reserve currency status is the only thing holding the US economy up. As countries no longer need as many dollars, those excess dollars will find their way back to the US to raise price inflation on everything of value and the Fed can’t do a damned thing about it. The trend is obvious if you want to open your eyes and see it. What I’m suggesting is to front run the eventual failure under conditions you can at least partly control as opposed to being surprised by the next “lehman moment” somewhere in the world that will take the system down chaotically.

    I’m not suggesting doing this as an individual. I’m suggesting this as a national movement where if just 10% of the population decided not to show up for work, the cascading failures would seize up most activity. The truckers alone could shut the whole country down as deliveries terminate. The dock workers could take down the stock market when Walmart’s shelves are near empty. The nurses could terminate the covid and mandate bullshit if they simply said no more. …

    If you think that by doing what you’ve been doing is some way to protect yourself and your kin, then you’re living in a fantasy world. If you still live in a city, if you don’t have a year’s worth of food and water on hand, etc, etc, etc, you’re dead meat some time in the near future.

  139. @MGB777

    I realize I phrased that poorly. The US military has lost every war since Vietnam would have been more clear and was my intent.

    I lived through the Vietnam days and got drafted but refused induction into murder incorporated, which is a more accurate description of what the US military actually is and has been for decades.

  140. Agent76 says:

    Jan 6, 2014 The Century: America’s Time – The 90s And Beyond: Then And Now

    Part fifteen of a 15-part series of documentaries produced by the American Broadcasting Company on the 20th century and the rise of the United States as a superpower.

  141. anonymous[221] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    The United States is a very dangerous country in which to live. People are increasingly trapped in debt bondage, in communities they can’t escape, and Shlomo is taking away their civil rights while smearing them as domestic terrorists. We already know the DOJ and law courts are deeply corrupted. Now, we know that the IRS is (again) being weaponized against ordinary Americans. Your sons have gone from being denigrated and labelled in grade school, to being openly preyed upon by sexual predators who want them dressing in drag and cutting off their junk. We have an anti-white bigot as AG, and a deep state that deprives Americans of the franchise and consorts with the nation’s adversaries. You can’t defend yourselves from violent pavement apes, and your congressman and congresswoman are bought and sold like whores at auction. Finally, you have an ethno-oligarchy in place that is quite happy to destroy America by beggaring it. And tens of millions of whites still drink the kool-aid.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  142. Nat X says:

    I love coming to this site laughing at all you whining yts. Its especially funny when I read some of yalls solution to the “dindoo problem.” Too late yts; we aint living in yalls grandaddys time. And when yall do take to the streets…Im reminded of that infamous tiki torch march, ROTFLMBAO!!!!!

  143. @Priss Factor

    I’m someone attacks Rush “Fat Slob Dope Fiend” Limbaugh.

  144. @Jud Jackson

    The Republicans never had any intention of doing what they said. They only cut taxes on the Rich and steadfastly block minimum wage increases, including fake populist Trump.

  145. @The Anti-Gnostic

    Zimmerman was a fat child living with his parents.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  146. The mainstream culture was such in the 1990s that black ethnonarcissim and alphabet mafia exhibitionism were able to be quite easily avoided. If you didn’t want to see large-bottomed black women shaking their derrieres in public you could just turn the channel away from In Living Color. Out and proud gays were witty, ridiculous characters on Will and Grace which aired after 9, so you could avoid “the gay show” entirely.

    I think the delusion of the GOP during that era was that black respectability politics was winning via mainstream depictions of the Cosbys and other manifold Sidney Poitier impressions where the black protag0nist struggled against racism without appeals to authority and his show of dignity and hard work won the day. Blacks were going to come around eventually.

    Both parties were really loathe to hitch their wagons to gays, and the concern was mostly centered around HIV/AIDS funding (which was disproportionately outrageous but a point to which people could be persuaded) rather than compulsory celebration. On the edges of the culture like MTV and WB you could see the beginnings of the new ideology but they were contained and would retreat to the dark corners of academia when challenged. You used to be able to easily find video of the elite of the Democratic party’s office holders who remain relevant today proclaiming that “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman!” (They of course did this to curtail the momentum for a Constitutional Marriage Amendment and substituted the booby prize of DOMA).

    It was really the catastrophic misstep of the Iraq War coupled with accelerated mass third world immigration which depleted conservatives’ store of domestic political capital to the point that the freaks and race obsessives could become a driving force within the Democratic party demanding that their fringe concerns be foregrounded. That was the period when leftists would publish articles and books like “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” which posed the question of why the vast white middle classes could not be bought off with social spending in exchange for giving the leftists free reign to impose their alien culture in places like Kansas.

  147. @EliteCommInc.

    As for Trayvon Martin, he was a young man who was stalked by some unknown “creepy guy” and chose to stand his ground and got shot for it

    Yeah the poor little cherub just went out for some candy.

    I am no fan of armed “security guards” but this info was suppressed by the MSM and, I believe, at trial too:

    The Skittles and Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail drink he carried that night are ingredients that, when mixed with dextromethorphan (DXM) cough syrup, create “Lean”, a concocted high which can cause psychosis and aggression over the longer term. According to the autopsy report, Martin’s liver showed damage consistent with DXM abuse.

    Sad to say, Trayvon was a “loadie”, got aggressive and jumped a guy who was carrying a piece. Don’t bring fists to a gunfight.

  148. @Occasional lurker

    I don’t know why Obama is such a bogey man for you. He didn’t stoke BLM riots, like the Democrats after him did.

    Obama gave support to the lunacy that good boys are being murdered for no reason other then the color of their skin by racist cops. He planted the seed with his response to Ferguson for the justification of future BLM riots.

    “COLUMBIA, S.C. — Racial discrimination from police in Ferguson, Missouri, was “oppressive and abusive,” President Barack Obama said Friday as he called for criminal justice reform as part of the modern struggle for civil rights.”

    The one good result of Obama calling Missouri residents a bunch of redneck racists in 2014/2015 was it turned Missouri into a solid red state.

    “Missouri was historically viewed as a bellwether state, but the consecutive votes against the winning candidate in 2008 and 2012 introduced doubts about its continued status as a bellwether, and an 18.5-point Republican victory in 2016 indicated that it had become a safe red state.”

  149. werpor says:
    @Jacobite2

    White America ended in December 1913. Few people in my experience understand money. Or for that matter have any knowledge about American History. Worse, they have no knowledge about European History. The American Revolution was posited on a rather vague proposition. The American Revolution was all about money — and trade — and tariffs. It was Southerners’ whom understood to what extent English banking interests and political interests sought to keep agricultural products from the South, in high demand in Britain, under their thumb. It was an economic war. Growing agricultural products is cyclical. High tariff walls in England reduced the potential profitability of goods landed there. Retained earnings were also curbed by the cost of money. Money needed to finance operations. In other words the producers were being squeezed. The agriculturalists hoped a revolution would free them from the restrictive reins of England’s banking fraternity. Reminding readers here, that the Glorious Revolution was successful promulgated by European banking interests a Century before American interests recognized the threat the overseas banking fraternity was having in the Colonies.

    Then as now certain parties, voted against their own interests. Many emotionally —most certainly ignorant of those calculating that a successful revolution would hurt their pocketbooks — left for Canada. Revolution was more principled among Northerners than the economic calculation
    of Southerners, except those with vested interests in the relationship with England of whom there were many in the northeastern colonies. Then as now argument sown of ignorance and passion was set against calculating self interest.

    But of course everyone has interests. The Souther plantation sector had interests. The English banking sector had interests. The English Crown had interests. The same for the Monarchy in France. The Spanish had interests. The Catholic Church had interests. The most powerful interests then as now were banking interests. Once a government is controlled by banking interests it is their money power — calculating in their interests, which shape policies. The plantation owners understood things first hand. Almost all other farming producers sold the produce locally. Of course these small farmers and the small merchants may have been affected by powerful banking interests but they no doubt little understood just how powerful those banking interest were. It was the plantation owners in the American south who depended on overseas trade with England who first understood the power of the European and English bankers — and the bankers agents in New York.

    Americans collectively and every individual American has certain interests. But in general people are ignorant of first causes; the powerful currents and the resultant undertow buffeting them every moment of every day has a cause. When an enormous country like the United States is completely in the hands of a small minority of those with interests transcendent of the ideals formulated in the American Constitution which still for most distill their overriding feelings, while remaining at the mercy of those minority interests — whom of course manipulate the majority’s emotions, brainwashing them with a concocted confection — life will only get worse.

    Millions of people have been co-opted by the seeming betterment promised by each and every devolution promised as improvement, because of a value substitution intentionally camouflaged as progressive. One certain tactic used by progressives is the notion of rights. Ever single right given to some minority is stolen from the majority. As is every single dollar stolen from the majority justified as a right when granted to certain minorities.

    From the perspective of the present it is clear that it was the Southern Plantation owners whom on a large scale first understood the enormous power of the European bankers to throttle their interests. Evidence of their sophistication is the American Revolution. Before and ever since American interests have been subverted by a Banking Oligarchy. Almost every incidence of historical reference in the United States was caused and is still caused by this Banking Oligarchy — an oligarchy which finally took permanent hold in the United States in 1913.

    Looking to Washington for anything resembling a solution or solutions to the obvious predicament Americans at large are experiencing every day is a mirage. Washington is powerful; legislatively powerful most certainly, and because International Bankers control the MSM informationally powerful. But to be sure America is not run by Americans. Certain money interests run America. Americans are for the most part powerless participants in an enormous Ponzi scheme. From Wikipedia: A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. In a Ponzi scheme, the fraudsters do not invest the money — they steal it!

    Washington is the problem — definitely not the solution. A central bank owned and controlled by people other than the American people will never improve life for Americans.

    • Thanks: Thomasina
  150. @anonymous

    And tens of millions of whites still drink the kool-aid.

    They vote to continue the practices you describe and even worse, are enamored with the process to cheer on their favorite sociopath in the hope he’ll win and be the one to screw them over as opposed to the other guy.

    • Agree: Realist
  151. anon[405] • Disclaimer says:

    Most Blacks are still trying to find out how Nicole Simpson died. Sort of like Jews hunting down old nazis. Only ones not tribalists are Whites.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  152. I am sure there is some nuanced meaning here

  153. Sparkon says:
    @omegabooks

    …anti-war left….died in the 90s.

    What then was the motivation or political persuasion of all those demonstrators who turned out in late 2002 and early 2003 to protest against Bush’s impending invasion of Iraq?


    Image: Reuters

    The day was described by social movement researchers as “the largest protest event in human history”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_anti-war_protests

    There was some suspicion that the number of U.S. protestors that day was systematically underestimated in large U.S. cities, and some evidence emerged of police suppression of demonstrators in places like NYC and Colorado Springs.

    In my smallish college town of around 40,000, about 2,000 anti-war demonstrators of all ages rallied and marched through town that day, while the pro-war right mustered about 20 counter-demonstrators, or something, who skulked in the shade of a tree during the anti-war speeches. The event was entirely peaceful and there was no sign of the police.

    I think the failure of the 2003 anti-war protests did deflate the anti-war movement to some degree after the invasion of Iraq began, when waves of “support the troops” propaganda I mean patriotism swept over our fair land, forcing many of anti-war persuasion to keep their heads down.

    Unfortunately, while most of the anti-war protestors in 2003 could easily see through the many holes (lies) in Bush’s bogus justifications for attacking Iraq, many if not most in the anti-war crowd at that time were still entirely under the spell of 9/11.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  154. “The Skittles and Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail drink he carried that night are ingredients that, when mixed with dextromethorphan (DXM) cough syrup, create “Lean”, a concocted high which can cause psychosis and aggression over the longer term. According to the autopsy report, Martin’s liver showed damage consistent with DXM abuse.”

    uhhhh . . . so what? Liver damage while unfortunate is not a crime. And nothing liver damage alone consistent with anything is not a mandate by one’s neighbor’s, one security, one’s law enforcement, or neighborhood watch to engage in a stalking.

    This matter is very simple, all the adult had to do was identify himself, and while even that would not have been enough to enforce a stop or detain the young man — it would at the very least removed any stigma regarding being or behaving like a

    “creepy guy”

    No don’t stalk young men in dimly complexes or. Avoid causing or instigating unnecessary conflict. It would not matter if that young man was tripped ecstacy . . . or anything else. In all respects the adult exercised poor judgment and worse instigated a confrontation. For which he alone is responsible and no evidence disputes that fact.

    Note: according to at least one accounting as accountings go in abundance on this matter. The young man’s phone shuts off at the exact period as the supposed confrontation occurs. All indicators, that the young man while operating in fight or confrontation mode did so because he was afraid. And why if accurate, he maintained contact on the phone.

    Again it is not hard to understand what took place here.

  155. “Bruh.. you are mixing jews with Europeans.”

    I am unsure what this means.

  156. The 1990s saw the financialization and globalization and mass immigration kick into full swing.

    The corporate propaganda apparatus has protected the plutocrat globalizer billionaires and the top ten percent loot holders as they grab all the electronically conjured up loot from the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank.

    Tax the rich? Sure.

    Financially liquidate the billionaires and the top ten percent loot holders? Yes.

    Implode the asset bubbles created by the monetary policy extremism of the Federal Reserve Bank and that will financially liquidate the billionaires and the top ten percent loot holders.

    Implode the asset bubbles created by the Federal Reserve Bank to extinguish inflation.

    Three small increases in the federal funds rate will be sufficient to achieve the required implosion of the stock and bond and real estate asset bubbles. From 2.5 percent federal funds rate to 6 percent and from 6 to 10 and from 10 to 20 will instantly implode the asset bubbles in stocks and bonds and real estate. Of course you must stop the tens of billions of dollars in asset purchases that the Fed is doing now when they electronically conjure up dollars out of thin air to purchase mortgage-backed securities and the tens of billions or so a month in government bonds that the Fed buys.

    This is the third frigging asset bubble, starting in the 1990s, that the plutocrat- and privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank has inflated using monetary extremism — low or zero or negative interest rates, asset purchases, quantitative easing, dollar swaps, direct central bank purchases of sovereign and corporate debt, balance sheet ballooning, bailouts…etc. — and enough is enough, DAMMIT!

    The billionaires and the top ten percent loot holders must be financially liquidated. That is more important politically than taxing them a bit more or taxing them at all.

    QUANTITATIVE TIGHTENING WILL FINANCIALLY LIQUIDATE THE BILLIONAIRE PLUTOCRATS AND THE TOP TEN PERCENT LOOT HOLDER SNOT BRATS

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  157. Blacks will always hate white people because we’re successful and they aren’t.

  158. Bert says:

    Among truth-speaking books, you missed Vincent Sarich and Frank Miele’s “Race, The Reality of Human Differences.” It was published in 2004 by a small but mainstream publisher. Sarich was a University of California, Berkeley anthropologist and biochemical phylo-geneticist. He and his doctoral advisor were the first to estimate accurately the time of the chimpanzee-hominin divergence.

    Sarich was an accomplished scientist and also a race realist. Such a combination is not possible less than 20 years later.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Sarich

    He applied his earlier work to racial differentiation, which he saw as subgroupings below the level of species.[citation needed] He also argued that the smaller the amount of time required to create a given number of morphological difference, the more selectively significant the differences would necessarily be.

    Meaning that differences in IQ (morphological at the level of neurons) that developed over only 50K years are derived from intense natural selection. Currently that selection is not operative, but it will be resumed when the current, unstainable form of society collapses. The two Eurasian races will prevail because they have the only phenotypic trait that matters, when push comes to shove.

  159. @anon

    You gotta speak the cold hard facts about the blacks.

    I say things about ni\$\$gers that will turn the [email protected]@ers white.

    Now, that’s some powerful truth.

  160. There is no GIANT WHITE CONSPIRACY holding down blacks . They fail because they are so mentally inferior . The evidence is overwhelming.

    1. Black-americans come in last in all standardized tests. Asian-americans do fine on all the tests so it’s not due to cultural bias in the tests.

    2. Africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. All of black africa is now controlled by blacks and has been for decades so it’s not due to racism.

    3. No black has ever won a Science Nobel Prize unless you count one in 1979 for the semi-science of economics. They have won many nobels in non-brain fields like Peace and also in Literature so it is not due to racism.

    4. Out of 1725 chess grandmasters in the world, only THREE are black.

    5. 50 years of affirmative action special treatment and blacks have fallen even further behind. What does that tell you?

  161. TTSSYF says:
    @Occasional lurker

    At least GWB had been governor (twice) of a large state. Obama hadn’t even served a full term as Senator, an office he obtained by illegally leaking damaging divorce records of his opponent. But I’ll grant you that Obama was not worse than Biden. How could he be? They are both unmitigated disasters.

  162. The 1990s saw the start of the full force of the evil and demonic Baby Boomer attacks on WHITE CORE CHRISTIAN AMERICA.

    The Baby Boomers are evil and demonic and they went total deviltry in the 1990s.

    If the fight was over who did more damage to the USA while president and the fight was between Baby Boomers Bill Clinton and George W Bush, I would have to say George W Bush. Mostly because of the fact that George W Bush dragged the American Empire and the USA and the US military into the Iraq war debacle.

    Both Bill Clinton and George W Bush were and are Baby Boomer nation-wrecking rats who did great harm to the USA while they were president. They’re still at it.

    Baby Boomers Bill Clinton and George W Bush pushed mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION and globalization and financialization and trade deal scams and multicultural mayhem and a whole lot of other treasonous things.

    Bill Clinton used the REFUGEE OVERLOAD racket to lower wages for US workers and to provide CHEAP LABOR for his paymasters in the Cheap Labor Lobby.

    Baby Boomer globalizer rodent Bill Clinton is a complete and total whore for the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire. Ruling class puppet whore Bill Clinton flooded the USA with Bosnians and other REFUGEE OVERLOAD in the 1990s at the behest of the CHEAP LABOR FACTION in the Democrat Party and the Republican Party.

    Mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION lowers wages for American workers and increases housing costs and swamps schools and overwhelms hospitals and causes urban and suburban sprawl and harms the environment and increases income inequality and brings crime and infectious diseases and radical Islamic terrorism to the USA.

    The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire has been using REFUGEE OVERLOAD as a demographic weapon to attack and destroy the European Christian ancestral core of the USA.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  163. Corrupt says:
    @Tono Bungay

    Someone denying the propensity of blacks committing violent crime

    “i can say that any male who if removing that nonsense of “black aggression” a common trope of fear mongering”

    is nothing more than a troll, and deserves no answer.

  164. TTSSYF says:
    @That Would Be Telling

    Yeah, I’ve been rethinking the 2012 election, less and less it seems probable after four years of Obama, although Romney was really about the worst possible candidate they could run, including unable to credibly criticize Obamacare.

    I told one of my company owners, in private, right after the 2012 election that there was no way those in control were going to let the first black President go down in history as a one-termer. I was quickly hushed for stating that quiet part out loud.

    • Thanks: That Would Be Telling
  165. The 1990s saw the end of the Republican Party in California. The Republican Party will soon go the way of the DODO nationally, and the new political party called WHITE CORE CHRISTIAN AMERICA will emerge to challenge the evil and demonic JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    Trump got the ball rolling by instigating a donor vs voter civil war in the 2016 Republican Party presidential primary, and the switch from fraud to force by the ruling class will further the cleavages in American politics. Pelosi’s cleavage as seen in those Italian beach photos is an indicator of this. The War of Jenkins’ Ear? Okay. The War Of Pelosi’s Beach Cleavage? It’s on the way!

    The Republican Party has been a disaster for White Core Christian Americans. You would have to go back to Ike to find a Republican Party president who was decent. Reagan’s 1986 amnesty for illegal alien invaders was a harbinger of doom for the California GOP. The 1990 immigration law signed and pushed by George HW Bush dramatically increased legal immigration and destroyed the Republican Party in California.

    Reagan allowed the Neo-Conservative Jews to infiltrate the foreign policy establishment of the GOP. George W Bush allowed the Neo-Conservative Jews to steer the American Empire into the Iraq War debacle.

    Trump started to jump in the polls during the 2016 New Hampshire presidential primary after he did two things: 1) Trump used the immigration issue to smash his GOP opponents and 2) Trump strongly went after the GOP ruling class and ruling class GOP stooges like Rubio and Jebby.

    The globalizer GOP that pushes open borders mass immigration, job-killing trade deal scams and Neo-Conservative foreign wars is just as dangerous and treasonous as the Democrat Party globalizers.

    THE EVIL AND DEMONIC JEW/WASP RULING CLASS OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE IS TREASONOUS AND IT MUST BE POLITICALLY DECAPITATED.

    THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1066.

    RULING CLASS REMOVAL IS VERY MUCH NEEDED.

  166. ebear says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Rock music? LOL! Ask yourself who controlled that industry when it was vinyl based and you had to drop ten bucks or more for the latest album by some overpaid, opinionated drug addled fuck ups whose only claim to fame was destroying hotel rooms and boinking underage girls.

    The internet ended all that, and not a moment too soon. Napster and Audio Galaxy put an end to that obscene profit centre and opened the door for a wide range of artists who were, for the first time, able to reach an audience that wanted to hear what they, not music industry executives, wanted them to play.

    Once the flood gates were open of course a lot of low quality noise came rushing through, but that sorted itself out by audience approval, not by executive fiat deciding what the “youth of today” want to hear. The end result, after fits and starts, was a massive amount of quality music across multiple genres which was not only affordable, but could be heard live in small venues at an affordable price, instead of risking one’s life in massive overcrowded venues filled with stoned out of control fools.

    I grew up in the “rock era” but I don’t listen to any of it anymore, not even for nostalgia’s sake. There’s just far too much quality contemporary music to be bothered with that tired old crap. As for the reunion trend, the only band worth its salt is the Rolling Stones, and that’s because they never really quit, the love of their craft being more important to them than the money they were rolling in, stoned or otherwise.

  167. “They lost Vietnam. Unless “win” means inflict the most damage/destruction/hatred/war crimes.”

    ” The US military has lost every war since Vietnam would have been more clear and was my intent.”

    Both of these comments are not only over the top, they are incorrect.

    The Unites States, Australia and the South Vietnamese fought a war to its successful conclusion in 1973. The won the conflict despite a complex internal social system. The North Vietnamese, North Korea, China and the Soviet Union lost the conflict when the North Vietnamese agreed to , same peace deal as existed in 1965, ’68, ’70.

    During the three years following, South Vietnam with US support fended off attempts by North Vietnam, North Korea, and the Soviet Union to take S. Vietnam by force in violation of the agreement (peace treaty). On two occasions the South Vietnamese held their own alone. Finally the Soviets’, N Koreans, and China were able to successfully over run the country.

    The US service men acted with honor during that conflict and it is unfortunate that the support in the US was so riddled with nonsense such as my favorite

    “Give peace a chance” mantra.

    The only violations of the peace were by North Vietnam, North Korea, China and the Soviet Union. Had they ceased invading — peace would have been the rule of the day. They could have politically worked for unification. They chose war and the South Vietnamese had every right to defend themselves against aggression.

    Were there violations — absolutely, such is the nasty nature of war and what it brings out in human beings. But more than by and large — the US service fighting man h9inorably and effectively fought the enemies of peace to a successful conclusion. One cannot account for the lack of integrity of one’s foes whose duplicitous intent violated the agreement.

    A brief look at Vietnamese history shows that the border in question had long been a source of conflict and served as a natural demarcation one of separation. Vietnamese history demonstrates that Vietnam had only been unified when under occupation.

    Kuddos to the men and who served with them in that conflict — not everyone buys into the nonsensical bill of goods sold by the wars opponents and the weak kneed who eventually bowed to the same.

    No service member ever, ever, ever need be ashamed of the defense they gave for another, as was the case in S. Vietnam.

    • Troll: RoatanBill
  168. A lost opportunity of the 1990s is the fact that illegal alien invaders weren’t all deported and all illegal immigration wasn’t stopped cold.

    US Attorney General Merrick Garland is a JEW from Chicago who is illegally allowing the illegal alien invasion of the United States of America.

    Merrick Garland is a complete and total stooge puppet for the evil and demonic JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas are aiding and abetting the illegal alien invasion of the USA.

    Biden, Harris, Garland and Mayorkas must all be immediately arrested for aiding and abetting illegal alien invaders and for illegally giving the illegal alien invaders safe harbor.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas must be arrested and when they are convicted they must be sentenced to lengthy prison sentences and then after their prison terms are served, they must have their citizenship revoked and they must be legally and forcibly deported to walled and fenced concentration compounds in a hot and fetid part of sub-Saharan Africa.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas all push mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas are anti-White and anti-Christian.

    Mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration increases housing costs, lowers wages, swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, destroys habitat for wildlife, causes urban and suburban sprawl, creates multicultural mayhem and brings infectious diseases and terrorism to the United States of America.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  169. @Charles Pewitt

    QUANTITATIVE TIGHTENING WILL FINANCIALLY LIQUIDATE THE BILLIONAIRE PLUTOCRATS AND THE TOP TEN PERCENT LOOT HOLDER SNOT BRATS

    You make a case for that, but I can’t help but note it’ll also make servicing the Federal debt hard to impossible. Pretty sure that’ll bring down a great deal of the US and world’s economy, here I’m talking about basic banking to transfer money from A to B. Like our ability to buy and sell food internally and externally.

    Financially liquidating your targets would also cause a great deal of direct damage … and to the extent it doesn’t, if not you plenty others will go for physical liquidation which never ends well. Looking at your next rant against Boomers I have to wonder how many people will be left alive in your ideal America. Also say good bye to humanity colonizing Mars so we aren’t making a 100% bet on the earth.

    It’s a problem that needs solving, will perforce be solved sooner or later step by crash by collapse etc. at a time, I just don’t see your plan as anything but a worst case way to do that without giving anyone time to replace what you plan to destroy, plus policy based on vengeance is dangerous, on envy is terminal.

  170. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Sparkon

    Unfortunately, while most of the anti-war protestors in 2003 could easily see through the many holes (lies) in Bush’s bogus justifications for attacking Iraq, many if not most in the anti-war crowd at that time were still entirely under the spell of 9/11.

    Which is a politically correct way of saying under the spell of ZOG. And they’ll still flinch when ZOG is mentioned, and fidget and blink and hem and haw, because it contradicts their entire lives brainwashing to hold the “chosen” and the “persecuted” accountable. And at first opportunity, they’ll retreat into the comforting arms of mommy, who will assure them that bad people have been poisoning their minds with anti-Semitism.

    This is how the Anglosphere has behaved ever since the ((Cousinhood)) got its hooks in.

    These people, left to right, have zero character. Suckling at ZOG’s teets has destroyed it. And they’ll eventually have zero existence, for what has become a nest of vipers is doomed unless they grow a pair of “anti‐Semitism.”

    Is that even possible with ZOG systematically poisoning the well with gender bending toxins? Doubtful.

  171. America doomed itself when it made blacks citizens. You were already promoting Jewish interests in Europe by the 1910s because Wilson was complaining about European countries who denied non-Christians citizenship. lol

  172. “If you disagree, TWBT, state your argument. Calling someone a troll is juvenile nonsense.”

    If you can find a comment in which i call anyone any name at all you are welcome to bring it to my attention. I took a review and could no such reference. As a general rule, I don’t call anyone names. And have not in these exchanges

  173. ” . . . is a moron. Nothing but jibberish in every post.”

    I make no excuses for for poor writing. But I think my position is fairly clear

    The adult who never identified himself was following a kid at night and despite attempts by the kid to avoid said

    “creepy man”

    the adult was confronted as any male might do in similar circumstance. That confrontation by the kid was and remains an act of self defense – period. The incident was the sole fault of the adult. The remained adult neighborhood watch member who was informed to not follow the kid.

    What is interesting is how quickly when confronted with data, so many are willing to hopscotch to some other irrelevant issue.

    case in point, the police report analysis which found that the adult version of his head being repeatedly banged against the pavement less than truthful. The response to that was to dump the police analysis and lay hold of the jury.

    and the only ones name calling here are those that disagree with me. I don’t call anyone names in these exchanges.

  174. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:

    Thanks, baby boomers!

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  175. I do appreciate being reminded to improve my attention to proof reading.

    I will add being called simian right alongside

    jew, troll, white something or other, moron, low IQ, an n’ lover . . . and a host of others, it’s a long list.

    Laughing.

  176. GenFranco says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Good grief. Every comment by you is a long-winded, snarky, fact-free word salad.

    Who told you it was clever to break up sentences and paragraphs that way? Find that person and punish him.

  177. Alvin says:
    @Justvisiting

    “That is what turned me from cuckservative to race realist.” Same thing happened to me. I thought the transgender bathroom controversy in North Carolina several years back was just a conservative bogeyman, that BLM was only concerned with police violence against blacks, and so on. Then came the lockdowns and masks, and the nation going up in flames over a violent criminal who died from fentanyl poisoning. Boy did I wake up.

    • Replies: @Anon
  178. Walsh is opportunist who will never risk his Youtube channel by saying anything at all about race. He will defend whites a tiny bit but he will never ever admit we are not all the same.

  179. JR Foley says:
    @Twin Ruler

    It really began the night of September 10 —Towers of Doom were wrestling Mankind and Undertaker—M Bush was referee but memory problems had him stumble counting to 3. It was a big loss for the Towers of Doom,

  180. Please allow me to “add my two cents worth.” This entire subject is a bunch of nonsense, as is the situations regarding Russia and China. It all has to do with money, with the U.S. banks and other nations’ banks trying to make money any way they can. But it is not just the banks; it is the big corporations, as well as our continually corrupt American government. I will try to explain.

    First, the formation of the “Federal Reserve” and the U.S. income tax laws. Then, with the funding coming primarily from the United States, the Russian “revolution” was allowed to happen. After the so-called Russian revolution, our country and other so-called “free countries” exported their technology to Russia, to allow Russia to become a world power. All this happened with the blessings of the U.S. State Department and other U.S. government agencies. For a very detailed explanation of all this, READ the many books by Antony Sutton, Ph.D. (now deceased) on the subject. Jim Marrs has also written some excellent books on the situation in which we find ourselves.

    In a likewise manner, the United States and other so-called “free countries” exported their technology and manufacturing expertise to China. Voila! Now we have a couple of very bad enemies – Russia and China! The whole thing is one big farce; one sick joke. And the American taxpayers and the other honest taxpayers around the world are footing the bill.

    I am absolutely sick of the whole thing, but I am powerless to do anything about it. Neither Trump nor the “Democratic” or “Republican” “parties” are going to do ANYTHING to correct matters, as they are all a part of the “system” – they are in on the “take.” It is all one big CON!

    Thank you.

    • Replies: @Jett Rucker
  181. @EliteCommInc.

    It is not against the law to follow someone in public. It is against the law to attack someone for following you. Martin was the attacker and he was killed in self defense. Blacks idea that their feelings trump the law is why so many are in prison.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Thanks: Detroit Refugee, AceDeuce
    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  182. The 90’s were the last gasp of culture and genuine human interaction in the USA and other white settler states.

    Kinda like Buffy the Vampire Slayer was the last Hollywood-made TV series that openly mocked the US War Machine. It’s been nothing but skynet and lies ever since, and on top of that we can’t even make cute sweaters like Xander wore every single day on Buffy, either. So sad!

  183. Ronald Reagan’s 1996 amnesty for illegal immigrants?!?

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  184. “It is not against the law to follow someone in public. It is against the law to attack someone for following you. Martin was the attacker and he was killed in self defense. Blacks idea that their feelings trump the law is why so many are in prison.”

    “apparently unaware of what stalking is.”

    I have no idea about black feelings. if you follow someone and your conduct of following causes fear, anxiety and you have no legal mandate to do so — then you certainly qualify as a stalker and in this case under the circumstances — absolutely inciteful conduct.

    It matters not what your skin color is. Entirely irrelevant in every respect. There’s a reason the dispatcher instructed the adult not to follow —

    ————————–

    “Good grief. Every comment by you is a long-winded, snarky, fact-free word salad.
    Who told you it was clever to break up sentences and paragraphs that way? Find that person and punish him.”

    Hmmmm . . . interesting.

    now about this stalking incident. What5 I appreciate about posti8ng is that the exchange is on record. The facts regarding this incident are not complicated or comprehend. The only time the adult was under threat is when he was confronted by the young man for

    “stalking him”

    A simple identifying comment early on would have most likely changed the circumstance but as it is on record,

    a “creepy guy”

    was following a kid in the dark and the kid opted to confront the person creeping him out. We have no idea who was physical first nor does it matter, the initial cause was the behavior of the adult.

  185. anonymous[792] • Disclaimer says:
    @tanabear

    Right, and for those Whites who were still open-minded about whether Blacks could think beyond their own narrow interests, the Simpson verdict settled the question in 1995. By the way, how come you stopped posting at Sailer?

  186. @Swaytonious

    Jews are a white group (well maybe not sephardic Jews). In fact they’re lighter skinned many European white ethnos.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  187. Here’s some missing context. As late as the 1950s out-of-wedlock birth among blacks was LOWER than it was with whites of European descent. After the 1960s that changed. Out-of-wedlock birth today among blacks is over 70%. As welfare has become more prominent out-of-wedlock dependency skyrockets. Not just with blacks but also all other ethno groups as well. Incidently the lowest out-of-wedlock birthrate is among Asians. Crime also goes up with welfare usage. I guarantee white males raised in a household dependent on welfare with a single parent have a high probability of ending up with a criminal record. Contrast that to two parent married black households which if I recall have a welfare dependency in the single digits. Welfare dependency is the problem coupled with anti-white cultural Marxist propaganda.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  188. Jett Rucker says: • Website
    @AceDeuce

    All elections are stolen. Sometimes, some of the stealing is spotted. By people stealing for the other side.

  189. Rooster16 says:
    @Priss Factor

    My childhood was in the early 90s, and if not for a sense of race realism at home, and sites like this today, I might be as lost as the rest of my peers. I can tell you the destructive force of “diversity propaganda” from that era has not been felt in full force yet… and that’s a very scary reality. Although my friends and I went to a school with a very high black population, and realized early on how different they were, many got wrapped up into the rap/nba/ghetto culture allure and became “black allies”. Demographics are destiny, and America, or what’s left of it, is in for a very violent decline. Do not expect the millennials to raise a finger to stop it.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
  190. Jett Rucker says: • Website
    @Brad Anbro

    I’m a (US) taxpayer, sure as hell.
    But honest? NOT EVEN if I pass my next IRS audit. (I’ve passed all so far.)

  191. @Jonathan Gillispie

    jews are not white.

    jewish DNA is middle eastern…..direct genetic cousins to the Palestinians they murder on a daily basis.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  192. @Anonymous

    “Thanks, baby boomers!”

    Found the jew.

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  193. @Charles Pewitt

    Dude….you sound like a low IQ drunk.

    The problem isn’t “WASPS” or “boomers,” you dimwit.

    The problem is organized jewry.

    Follow the money.

  194. @Reverend Goody

    And acted in defense of the civil order and cleared a tax eater from the gene pool. God bless George Zimmerman.

  195. Anon[223] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rich

    There’s plenty of history of homosexuality in ancient times. It was Judaism, Christianity and Islam that made it taboo. We are no longer Christians in America so we are repeating the ancients’ mistakes. Nothing new under the sun.

  196. @Robert Dolan

    “Thanks, baby boomers!”

    Found the jew.

    It is a marvelous method to further atomize whites, getting the various generations at each other’s throats instead of working together when that’s possible. Obviously there are people who are beyond help in every generation, but the unthinking hatred behind this precludes seeing beyond them.

    See also idiocies like blaming the earliest, the cultural Baby Boomers for the decisive “civil rights” and immigration legislation of the middle 1960s before any of them could vote.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
    • Thanks: Robert Dolan
  197. @Robert Dolan

    jewish DNA is middle eastern…..direct genetic cousins to the Palestinians they murder on a daily basis.

    Well he means the Ashkenazi which are really a hybrid even if they don’t like admitting to it. And yes they are lighter than Italians and Greeks.

    American Jews are more Slavic than middle eastern. They are pretty distant from their Sephardic cousins.

    But the Jew rule is maternal so they don’t really care about what the DNA says.

    The Ashkenazi most likely bred with some Polish or Russian group a long time ago. That part of their origin is a still a mystery. They actually have quite a few genetic disorders from being genetically exclusive for a long period. A very politically incorrect subject of course.

  198. You forgot Woodstock ‘99. Lowbrow pop, but still. Bros tore down hippie murals for being fake and gay, ran thot patrol to make muslims proud, and burnt the place down because price-gouging for bottled water.

    “After the concert, Everlast added, ‘People are trying to blame bands for what the kids did and say what a reflection it is on this generation. All those people are nostalgic for something that happened 30 years ago. I don’t think anything real came out of that first experience— it was just three days of sex and drugs and— ‘Oh, the world is such a great place!’ Then they went home, became yuppies, and fucked the whole country up.’”

    https://www.spin.com/2019/07/woodstock-99-live-report/

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  199. @Rooster16

    You’re right. The “Whiggers” are useless.
    It’ll be up to Gen-Xers like myself and probably those older than that.

  200. AceDeuce says:
    @Paintersforms

    “After the concert, Everlast added, ‘People are trying to blame bands for what the kids did and say what a reflection it is on this generation. All those people are nostalgic for something that happened 30 years ago. I don’t think anything real came out of that first experience— it was just three days of sex and drugs and— ‘Oh, the world is such a great place!’ Then they went home, became yuppies, and fucked the whole country up.’”

    Interestingly:

    In 1996, Everlast converted from Catholicism to Islam.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everlast#Personal_life

  201. Anonymous[546] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    Just go back to the patriarch of all Jewish people, Jacob (trickster) in Genesis. Jacob tricks all his relatives, is tricked himself (and so would think that everybody else is a trickster), fights with God (or some sort of supernatural being), is defeated so bas
    dly that he limps the rest of his life, plays the “We fought, and you hurt me! You owe me!” trick to get a blessing from God, and thus claims he “fought God and won” meaning that the blessing was worth more than the limp cost.

    That’s the Jewish ideal to this day. If you look at the above, it’s the story of the 1960s takeover of the Tammany Hall derived US political structure after WW II, and therefore the world.

    Sadly enough for Jewish influence, historically their takeovers failed in the long run. Their tricksters couldn’t keep their eye on business, couldn’t govern, and kept on playing tricks after this became obvious. The “Trump/Russia” trick is a recent example. The Jewish tragedy [1] is that they are a one trick people: the trick is that they are tricksters to the end.

    *****************************************
    1] Tragedy: the story of an entity doomed by its inability to transcend its own strengths. Hamlet couldn’t let the corruption of the court be, Assyria had the best Army in the world, but couldn’t stop conquering until everybody was either in the Army or a slave or a peon, Assyrian wasn’t spoken outside the Army and its dependents, and Assyria as a society was dead. Then came the revolt. That sort of thing.

  202. AceDeuce says:
    @Jonathan Gillispie

    Here’s some missing context. As late as the 1950s out-of-wedlock birth among blacks was LOWER than it was with whites of European descent. After the 1960s that changed.

    Complete and total horseshit.

    Here’s a guy you might have heard of–Martin Luther King. This is from a speech he gave in 1957, nearly 10 years before the Great Society programs were implemented:

    Let us be honest with ourselves, and say that we, our standards have lagged behind at many points.

    Negroes constitute ten percent of the population of New York City, and yet they commit thirty-five percent of the crime.

    St. Louis, Missouri: the Negroes constitute twenty-six percent of the population, and yet seventy-six percent of the persons on the list for aid to dependent children are Negroes.

    We have eight times more illegitimacy than white persons.

    We’ve got to face all of these things. We must work to improve these standards. We must sit down quietly by the wayside, and ask ourselves: “Where can we improve?” What are the things that white people are saying about us?

    They say that we want integration because we want to marry white people. Well, we know that is a falsehood. (That’s right) We know that. We don’t have to worry about that. (All right)

    Then on the other hand, they say some other things about us, and maybe there is some truth in them. Maybe we could be more sanitary; maybe we could be a little more clean. You may not have enough money to take a weekend trip to Paris, France, and buy all of the fascinating and enticing perfumes. You may not be able to do that, but you are not so poor that you cannot buy a five cents bar of soap (Yeah) so that you can wash before [word inaudible]. [applause]

    And another thing my friends, we kill each other too much. (All right, yes) We cut up each other too much. (Yes, Yes sir) There is something that we can do. We’ve got to go down in the quiet hour and think about this thing.

    https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/some-things-we-must-do-address-delivered-second-annual-institute-nonviolence#:~:text=We%20will%20win%20our%20freedom,taken%20from%20an%20audio%20recording.

    • Thanks: mark green
  203. A lot of Jew blaming as usual.

    Everyone conveniently forgets that a half pig non-Jew by the name of Rush Limbaugh led the 90s “conservative revolution” which means denying race and coming up with excuses like “big government” or “Democrat plantation” instead of facing the truth.

    Just watch some of his older TV shows on youtube. Total gluttonous pig race denier and the boomers loved him. He fulfilled their fantasy of race not existing and evolution just being something secular Democrats came up with. Them Bantu just need the Lord and lower taxes you see.

    I’ve pointed this out before only to be told that the Jews were still to blame because they own the networks.

    Well he actually owned his own internet show and nothing was stopping him from talking about race instead of the NFL. As with Murdoch he avoided Black crime. Fox ignores all kinds of stories where Whites are victims of horrific crimes. These Con Inc hucksters believe in lying to the masses about race but differ with liberals on which lies and excuses to tell. Take out the Jews and you still have lying pigs like Limbaugh that view the masses as sheep that need to be led. They think it is “unfair” that race exists and especially since it undermines their Randian pipe dreams. Unreal that Trump gave him a medal. He should have been given the title of “master deceiver” and dropped in the middle of Africa.

  204. Ace says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    They just wanted to prove to themselves how cool they were. Look at me!

  205. Ace says:
    @anonymouseperson

    And the question is never asked what is the source of the malevolence that operates all through the West to destroy it?

    Merkel was handed a German flag on stage once. She acted like someone had handed her a snake. So conditioned was she. Instantaneous, angry rejection of the essence of the nation.

    On the other side we saw Macron and his young bare-chested friends.

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  206. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    I do not understand why people idolize Reagan. As far as I am concerned, he was nothing but a washed-up B-movie actor, who did his best to bust unions, perpetuate the United States’ outrageous “foreign policy,” further the interests of the criminal “financial industry,” the anti-American corporations and their attendant groups, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.

    He certainly did NOTHING to further the interests of myself or of any others in the American Middle Class.

    Thank you.

  207. Corvinus says:
    @That Would Be Telling

    “Peoples from outside the Hajnal line are generally dangerous to white interests.”

    Exactly what are white interests? What are the metrics involved? Who decides them? Under what authority? Must all whites adhere to them? Why? Are white people allowed to challenge such notions? What happens to them if they do? Furthermore, what are these alleged dangers? Why?

    Put your money where your mouth is and offer a cogent response to these question rations.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  208. Che Guava says:
    @anarchyst

    How is Frank ‘serial’? I had not read of it before. It sounds likely, but if you could post a link to an on-line article or physical book, it may become convincing.

  209. @Ace

    Merkel was handed a German flag on stage once. She acted like someone had handed her a snake. So conditioned was she. Instantaneous, angry rejection of the essence of the nation.

    This reminds me a bit of the 2016 Libertarian Presidential candidates. VP was Bill Weld, long time Republican gun grabber. At the top of the ticket was Gary Johnson, GOPe? governor of rather Leftist New Mexico 1995-2003. At a campaign event he was handed a replica of George Washington’s flintlock pistol (ostensibly in a party unity move, not sure about that) which he promptly threw in the trash. Altogether both candidates told us the party have moved on from it’s “liberty” focus to, what, legal weed for everyone??

  210. @Brad Anbro

    I do not understand why people idolize Reagan. As far as I am concerned, he was nothing but a washed-up B-movie actor, who did his best to … perpetuate the United States’ outrageous “foreign policy,”

    You either weren’t politically aware in the late 1970s or haven’t done your research, or are an extraordinary evil lying traitor. And a soulmate of Obama who described Palin as a small town mayor instead of important state governor, here Reagan being a two term governor of California in a tumultuous period before seeking higher office.

    That “outrageous” foreign policy is something he didn’t exactly “perpetuate,” he was the first President determined to end the Evil Empire which he achieved.

    Economically, while Carter had replaced the Paul Volcker it still looked like doom was coming, that plus 1970s Cold War mismanagement and obvious cultural decay were the start of the survivalist movement which is now the more friendly named prepper movement. Reagan did a bunch of things that helped “the American Middle Class” like massive supply side tax cuts and taking the government’s boot of the neck of the fossil fuel industry. An area which is now quite a bit worse and much less sane, the Carter and maybe earlier bureaucrats who decided where every gallon of gasoline and Diesel at least made sure farming areas wouldn’t suffer from shortages.

    Once the tax rate cuts fully took effect (staged them in over several years helped assure a recession along with the interest rate hikes needed to curb the more normal inflation of the 1970s) it helped the middle class mightily along with the nation. We’re talking 70% to 50% max rates, and critically indexing so bracket creep caused by inflation nominally ended (the BLS CPI isn’t exactly honest). One thing we don’t thank Reagan for is how much he increased the income of the government, although the big 1982 I think it was FICA tax hikes weren’t necessarily good and were regressive.

    I personally witnessed my father’s business behavior change, no longer was legal tax avoidance an overriding consideration. The 1986 tax act was a mixed bag, but it did drop the highest rates to a much more sane 28% (then G. H. W. Bush “read my lips” did himself in with a hike to 31%, then Clinton to 39.6%; note this dance goes along with deduction games, Peter Schweizer in Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes, and Line Their Own Pockets, perhaps his most important book, explains that superbly).

    Perhaps it’s a tangent, but too many industrial unions had become so corrupt and lethally criminal they had to be busted. I think other racially homogeneous countries can make them work, but I think it’s obvious the don’t in the long term in the US. Note also how the remaining big ones are hard Left and don’t even pretend to look out for their member’s interests. But not a tangent is how Reagan continued supporting Lane Kirkland’s efforts to help Solidarity which was critical in ending the Evil Empire. He and Meany before him were staunch anti-Communists, today’s union leaderships are small ‘c’ communists if not genuine Communists.

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  211. @Brad Anbro

    I do not understand why people idolize Reagan.

    Reagan is practically the godfather of Con Inc style race denial.

    As California governor he started the trend of state based gun control rather than deal with the Black Panthers. He made it clear that he would rather take guns from Whites than make scary Blacks angry.

    He also started the trend of pushing tax cuts for the wealthy. Of all our problems we should focus on getting more wealth to the upper 1%. Then of course he blew up the budget like all fiscal conservatives.

    I also don’t see why anyone would idolize Reagan. What did that conservative revolution accomplish? The rich got richer and the liberals then took the country into a new era of faggotry and White guilt.

    Conservatives can’t even explain what they are trying to conserve. An empty ideology directed by wealthy funders that really want a tax break. Sell the proles on flags and apple pies. Maybe they won’t notice that we don’t do sh–t for them. Then the Democrats take the wheel and legalize goat f-cking and call it a constitutional right. In 10 years the conservatives tell us that goat f-cking is in fact a right but they will get us a capital gains tax break.

    A dumb ideology led by the amoral and greedy. Of course a B-movie actor is their hero. Someone has to be good at pretending to believe all this garbage.

  212. @John Johnson

    As California governor he started the trend of state based gun control rather than deal with the Black Panthers. He made it clear that he would rather take guns from Whites than make scary Blacks angry.

    “State based gun control” started after the War Between the States, of course only enforced against blacks until the ones aimed at the following wave’s immigrants like the 1911 Sullivan’s Law were put into place. Expanding them against whites happened long before Reagan was anything but a “B-rank movie actor,” union president and spokesman for GE in the 1950s. (Might have started before that decade, don’t know for sure.)

    You are right to ding him for the 1967 Mulford Act where he was hardly the only actor, was passed in such a rush it required 2/3rds supermajorities which I assume were also veto proof. Which is not to say that as crime was skyrocketing he indeed fully signed on to disarming citizens outside their homes, as far as I can tell from the Wikipedia article this made California a May Issue state. It wasn’t many years before crime reached such a level that the 1971 Dirty Harry and 1974 Death Wish bubbled this up to extremely popular culture. And while I haven’t researched it in extreme detail, the 1970s were the high water mark for “state based gun control.”

    In general, I can’t think of anything he did as governor that set trends, that’s after the fact propaganda after he became a national level player and then of course President after Watergate was used as an excuse to make all Republican Presidents and their administrations automatic criminals.

    He also started the trend of pushing tax cuts for the wealthy. Of all our problems we should focus on getting more wealth to the upper 1%. Then of course he blew up the budget like all fiscal conservatives.

    What you claim for him was previously a major JFK-LBJ thing that brought in enough money to fuel LBJ’s “guns and butter” delusions, Ike left us with 91% top marginal tax rates, only down 3% from WWII. Those rates, and the lowered but still very high 70% 1960s and on rates, plus inflation and tax bracket creep steadily squeezed everyone. Whereas however imperfect the BLS CPI is, he indexed income taxes except for capital gains for inflation.

    So for Reagan, except for the poorest who got hit with higher FICA taxes and took a net hit, but I note they were a lot more likely to be employed, “a rising tide lifts all boats.” He did later do things that indirectly set up those below the top 10-25% for destruction, the amnesty bill in particular, but look at the charts, the trends began in 1971, see the Nixon Shock as well as the Jews’ decisive victory in the 1960s-70s.

    He was certainly blind to them at best, perhaps a philo-Semite seeing as how he was a Hollywood star? [Insert usual rant against his (((NSF head))) that started trashing STEM careers.]

    More than sometimes I wish I could put people like you into an alternate history where you get what you want “good and hard.” Here including the likely end of the US and the victory of the USSR in the Cold War; political scientist among many other things in his 1970s fiction figured one best outcome was a Codominion of the two, special status for taxpayers and “welfare islands” fed with drugs for the worst off, although part of this was a desire to freeze technology so his fiction would be more accurate.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
    , @John Johnson
  213. Sparkon says:
    @That Would Be Telling

    More than sometimes I wish I could put people like you into an alternate history where you get what you want “good and hard.”

    Speaking of “alternate history,” as President of SAG, Ronald Reagan covered up the Communist past of future wife Nancy Davis, pinning the Communist sympathies on “the other Nancy Davis,” but when “the other Nancy Davis” was tracked down, she denied ever being a Communist, and said that the Reagans had been lying about her for years.

    In 1987, I found the other Nancy Davis working at a snack bar in Ventura, California, and interviewed her for The Nation. When I asked about the first lady, she said, “She’s been lying about me for years…. I never was a Communist. I told Reagan back in the fifties that if she didn’t stop saying I was a Communist, I’d sue her.”

    Ronald Reagan wrote in his autobiography, Where’s the Rest of Me?, that because his wife-to-be was assumed to be the other Nancy Davis, “her name kept showing up on rosters of Communist front organizations, affixed to petitions of the same coloration, and her mail frequently included notices of meetings she had no desire to attend, and accounts of these meetings as covered by the Daily Worker.” Nancy Davis Reagan was asked by Columbia Pictures to explain why her maiden name appeared on the amicus curaie brief supporting the Hollywood Ten. Ron, who was SAG president at the time, wrote an indignant letter to B.B. Kahane, Columbia vice president in charge of security, explaining that there were two Nancys, and that the other one was the Communist.

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/nancy-reagan-and-the-problem-of-the-two-nancys/

    Indeed, the damage Pres. Ronald Reagan did to the United States is just what I’d imagine a closet Communist would have done: downsizing, outsourcing and off-shoring U.S. industry to China, granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens in the United States, trading arms for hostages…

    And of course one has to wonder about that trip to Tehran in 1978 Reagan made in the company of George H.W. Bush and Margaret Thatcher, none of whom held any official position at the time. Not long after this unofficial visit, a host of suspicious troubles began for the Shah, leading to his downfall and departure, and the arrival of the Ayatollah and his fundamentalist mullahs.

    And of course, the Iranians were bribed with needed spare parts so that the hostages would not be released until after the election, paving the way for Pres. Carter’s defeat in 1980, and the ascension to the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, who already by that time had a reputation for absent mindedness and forgetting names, which are symptoms of dementia, likely making Pres. Ronald Reagan putty in the hands of his Neocon handlers, and leading one of his leading admirers to remark:

    “Poor dear, there’s nothing between his ears”

    — Margaret Thatcher

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  214. @That Would Be Telling

    You are right to ding him for the 1967 Mulford Act where he was hardly the only actor

    It wouldn’t have passed with a Democrat gov and the California Democrats used it as basis for pushing mindless gun control (read taking guns from Whites while hoping Black/Hispanic crime magically goes away). In fact LA Times still runs the occasional article thanking him for it and as evidence that states can overrule the 2A.

    What you claim for him was previously a major JFK-LBJ thing that brought in enough money to fuel LBJ’s “guns and butter” delusions, Ike left us with 91% top marginal tax rates, only down 3% from WWII. Those rates, and the lowered but still very high 70% 1960s and on rates, plus inflation and tax bracket creep steadily squeezed everyone.

    No one actually paid those top rates. Effective rates for the wealthy were much lower.

    As for JFK he pushed for lower income and capital gains taxes that were eventually adopted.

    Reagan cut the tax rate for millionaires and then massively increased spending. What a conservative hero. (slow clap)

    More than sometimes I wish I could put people like you into an alternate history where you get what you want “good and hard.”

    WTF are you saying? I live in a utopia thanks to Reagan? My wife and I hand over a third of our income to the government so what exactly should I be thanking Regan for? In Canada our income would be about the same but without healthcare premiums.

    Our conservatives are f-cking morons and their B-actor hero was just a whore for the wealthy. US conservatives won’t give up their fantasy of race not existing and “minimal government” being some magic force that will fix anything. A worthless ideology that just slows whatever liberals come up with by 10 years.

    In 10 years conservatives will be telling us that they made deal with Democrats to legalize pedersty but in exchange they got a 4 point capital gains tax cut. OH AND WE FOUND A BLACK CONSERVATIVE U GUYS!!!!

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  215. @John Johnson

    You are right to ding him for the 1967 Mulford Act where he was hardly the only actor

    It wouldn’t have passed with a Democrat gov

    Going to (again) give up on replying to you when you lie so blatantly. As I said, it passed with 2/3rds majorities, what’s needed to override a veto. Ballotpedia says both houses of the legislature were controlled by Democrats, and between a Wikipedia citation about gun control and Pat Brown’s attitude towards it (father of Jerry, defeated by Reagan in 1968), and this first Bing source I found:

    Then, for contrast [to a seizure of registered handgun in Bermuda], he offers Governor Pat Brown’s now 40 year old analysis of the “gargantuan task of trying to seize 10 million handguns or making law violators of 10 million people that now possess them.”

    Brown’s answer, more of a platitude really, exhibited the kind of glib governmental hubris that is in vast supply in the current debate. “The only answer I can give you” said Brown, “is that you have to begin someplace… I feel we should take the general position that handguns should be barred except by police officials and other authorized people, and then try to find out how to seize them in the days ahead.”

    The since the War Between the States the Democrats have always been the party of gun control with of course some exceptions and your fantasy aside, this included the Democratic who would have been governor if not for Reagan. At best your hate of Reagan and “conservatives” blinds to the specifics, at worst you’re on the other side and are most upset about Reagan ending the Evil Empire.

    No one actually paid those top rates. Effective rates for the wealthy were much lower.

    And through how much inefficient tax avoidance which I mentioned in my reply to the other vaguely sane Reagan basher?

    But even then this is a lie absent comparison of the existing means of legal tax avoidance, even if the effective rates were lower, there were lower still when the top rates were reduced. Along with, you know, the also lower rates for lower income tax brackets….

    In the message I replied to, you said, “[Reagan] also started the trend of pushing tax cuts for the wealthy.” and now you admit “As for JFK he pushed for lower income and capital gains taxes that were eventually adopted.” without, of course, acknowledging again you were wrong.

    More than sometimes I wish I could put people like you into an alternate history where you get what you want “good and hard.”

    WTF are you saying? I live in a utopia thanks to Reagan?

    And with this lie I’m done with you, for you clipped my following explanation of what that would be for you:

    Here including the likely end of the US and the victory of the USSR in the Cold War.

    What you and your wife experience today is indeed a utopia compared to that.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  216. Miro23 says:
    @RoatanBill

    The US military and the intel agencies are the deep state. The US has been a soft military dictatorship since JFK got whacked. Why do you think that the military can’t account for \$21 Trillion and no one in congress is concerned about that? Why do you think congress keeps pouring currency down a rat hole of a military that hasn’t won a war since Vietnam? Why do you think congress appropriates more funds than are requested?

    The military and the intel agencies have the dirt on every POS that gets elected.

    They work with the deep state because it’s in the interests of the top level military to do so.

    Check TKK’s link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/08/11/fbi_rip_148036.html

    However, there’s the problem of the higher/mid level military and the Enlistment Oath;

    §502. Enlistment oath: who may administer

    (a) Enlistment Oath.—Each person enlisting in an armed force shall take the following oath:
    “I, ____________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

    Note: Support and defend the Constitution comes before obey the orders of the President of the United States and obey the orders of officers appointed over me …. So help me God.

    So the US military have all they authority they need to take down the 9/11 conspirators and their collaborators.

    When they do so they’ll be doing the US and the World a big favour.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  217. Sparkon says:
    @Sparkon

    It seems “feather brain” Ronald Reagan was able to conceal his own past interest in Communism:

    Writer Howard Fast says Reagan, then a 27-year-old actor, got interested in the party because some of his Hollywood friends were Communists, London’s Sunday Times reports today.

    “He felt if it was right for them, it was right for him,” Fast says.

    By 1938, Reagan was “passionate” about the party, he says, but “they thought he was a feather brain and turned him down.”

    Fast says the party conducted an investigation after Reagan declared he wanted to sign up.

    “Word came back he was a flake … who couldn’t be trusted with a political opinion for 20 minutes,” he says.

    Fast says the party sent Reagan a delegation that “convinced him he could do more for the various causes the party represented in Hollywood as an outsider, as a friend of the party, than as a member.”

    “It took hours to talk him out of it.”

    https://nypost.com/1999/09/26/commies-rated-ron-too-dim-to-be-a-red-star-buddy-says-reagan-was-rejected-by-the-party/

    Yeah, “a friend of the party” could do a lot for the Reds, especially if he ended up to be President of the United States.

  218. @That Would Be Telling

    Thank you for your reply. The first thing I would like to address is unions. I was a Journeyman Electrician with the United Auto Workers (UAW) union and I have done extensive reading on the history and activity of unions in the USA.

    You are completely correct in your statement about corruption in unions these days. Over the years, there has been corruption in many unions. Many officers of the UAW union have either been convicted, are awaiting sentencing or are under indictment for corruption activities.

    When Walter Reuther was president of the UAW, there was ZERO corruption in that union. He would not tolerate any. Next to John F. Kennedy, Walter Reuther was the most highly respected American in Europe and he would attract crowds of thousands of people, because Europeans understood that Reuther was working for the betterment of ALL workers, not just union members.

    But the “powers that be” did not like Reuther or what he was trying to accomplish. He was involved in two plane crashes in less than a year’s time and the second crash was the fatal one. There had been evidence that the plane’s altimeter had been tampered with, but it was never pursued – there was NO real investigation that was ever made, just as there has never been any REAL investigations of the deaths of JFK, RFK, MLK, Jr., Malcolm X, Marilyn Monroe, Dorothy Kilgallen, Mary Pinchot Meyer and countless other Americans who have met suspicious or untimely deaths. “They” wanted Walter Reuther out of the way. Simple as that.

    It is true that Walter Reuther and his brother, Victor, spent considerable time in Russia, working alongside Russian workers in an automobile assembly plant. While in Russia, Walter became very disenchanted with Russia and how the Russian Communists treated their workers, etc. It is also true that there were Communists in the UAW, but Reuther did his best to cleanse the union of any Communist members it had. In my opinion, it is sad that Reuther supported Lyndon Johnson and the war in Vietnam. But other than that, I think that Walter Reuther was a very outstanding person.

    Now about “foreign policy” that our country has. You would do well to read some of the many books that Antony Sutton, Ph.D. (now deceased) has written on the subject. You will find out that since the Bolshevik Revolution that occurred in 1917 (which was NOT even a “Russian” revolution – it was financed by Americans and others) the United States was responsible for exporting technology to Russia, American technology was responsible for allowing the Russians to have a manufacturing capability and a military as advanced as ours. The United States ALLOWED Russia to become the world power that it became. Mr. Sutton did a lot of research on this subject, drawing on information from the State Department’s and the Commerce Department’s own records. It was American technology that was used AGAINST Americans in Korea and Vietnam. The United States continued exporting its technology into the 1980s.

    Let’s go back a little further in time, in regards to United States “foreign policy.” During the administrations of Franklin Roosevelt, many, if not most, of his government agencies had been infiltrated by Russia’s NKVD – the predecessor of their KGB. Very little was done to combat this problem, because the individuals working for a One World Government wanted Russia to have very advantage possible – the same group(s) of people who are currently “calling the shots.”

    You mention the “Cold War” – that was a farce in itself. Since American technology had equipped the Russians to become a “threat,” that became the perfect vehicle for the military-industrial complex to make untold billions of dollars in profit. General Patton, in World War II, saw just what kind of a person good ol’ Joe Stalin was and what Russia really was. He publicly spoke out against the United States’ foreign policy and that made him persona non grata. He wound up paying for it with his life, according to many researchers on this subject.

    Let’s go to present times now. Whatever happened to the “peace dividend” that we were supposed to have, at the end of the “Cold War?” Again, the American military-industrial complex needed those billions to keep coming in and now we have TWO big enemies – Russia AND China. And China, as with Russia, was supplied with American technology, just exactly like Russia was.

    If you think that I was singling out Reagan or the “Republican Party,” that was NOT my intention. I am of the opinion that both the Democratic and Republican parties are equally corrupt and bought-off and I do not have any hopes of either party getting our country back on track.

    Thank you.

    • Replies: @Anon
  219. @John Johnson

    Please see my reply to “That Would be Telling.” Thank you.

  220. @Miro23

    The US military hit the pentagon with a missile to take out the navy team trying to figure out where the then \$2 trillion DOD couldn’t account for went. Rumsfeld announced the discrepancy on 9/10/2001 and the very next day 9/11 happened. Building 7 in New York was the navy’s data back up site.

    You’re asking for the chief criminals to clean house.

    In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happened, you can bet it was planned that way.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt

  221. AceDeuce says:
    @James Scott

    It is not against the law to follow someone in public. It is against the law to attack someone for following you. Martin was the attacker and he was killed in self defense.

    Regarding the Trashcan Martin case–it’s just like all similar cases–that of the immortal rapey negro Emmett Till, for example, or countless others, if you want to smack the other side down hard–not that it’ll work on them (arguing with lunatics bears no fruit), just change the “color” of the participants in the incident at hand. Make the Whites black and the black Whites.

    So, an unfamiliar White teen who doesn’t live in the crime-plagued private community is wandering around rather aimlessly at night and an older black adult, who does live there, starts to watch him and follow him to see where he’s going.

    Or, a 14 year old White punk kid, in front of other people, grabs a young married black store clerk while she’s working and grinds up against her, while talking sexual schitt. Her tough black husband finds out about it.

    If every other detail remains the same, only the races swapped, the nigros and their cuck White enablers will side 100% with the formerly White/currently black side, and condemn the original black/currently White person–they will will spout off a million reasons in defense of their opinions. Swap the races back to the original, and none of those reasons are valid any longer.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  222. @That Would Be Telling

    Going to (again) give up on replying to you when you lie so blatantly. As I said, it passed with 2/3rds majorities, what’s needed to override a veto.

    Says nothing about US gun politics and how both sides will vote depending on who is in office.

    Rural and suburban Democrats are much more likely to support gun control if they can point at a Republican on the same bill and especially if it is the governor. It gives them political cover.

    At best your hate of Reagan and “conservatives” blinds to the specifics, at worst you’re on the other side and are most upset about Reagan ending the Evil Empire.

    I hate conservatives and liberals. Modern conservatives are boneheads that worry about Communists outside the US and ignore the enemy within. The fact that they still spend more time talking about Cuba and Venezuela than left-wing professors in every single college that are paid six figure salaries with US tax money shows their total lack of situational awareness. I’d sit through back to back indoctrination courses only to drive home listening to some blowhard AM radio host talking about godless Communists in Cuba. What a joke. These idiots have never even heard of the Frankfurt school. Reagan was more concerned with a Red Dawn scenario.

    Communism was going to collapse for economic reasons. That was predicted in the early 1920s by economists and even Stalin abandoned most of the core Marxist theories. But conservatives like Reagan operate on feels and don’t read boring economic papers.

    And through how much inefficient tax avoidance which I mentioned in my reply to the other vaguely sane Reagan basher?

    Reagan lowered tax rates for millionaires in exchange for cleaning up the code. Do you want to give him a cookie for that? The joke is that millionaires can always afford to avoid taxes unless you pass a wealth tax. Just read about the Clintons.

    Republicans should never have focused on tax breaks for the wealthy. It never made strategic sense and yet they still do it. Just look at GWB II’s capital tax breaks for billionaires. Obscene.

    As for JFK he pushed for lower income and capital gains taxes that were eventually adopted.” without, of course, acknowledging again you were wrong.

    I really didn’t know what you were trying to say. JFK supported lower taxes but the tax agreement was all just a compromise anyways that didn’t move the effective tax rates much. It is more complicated than as you were depicting it.

    What you and your wife experience today is indeed a utopia compared to that.

    How exactly? Russia and the US still have nukes pointed at each other and the Russians don’t have democracy. The GDR would have collapsed without Reagan’s speech. The Germans were tired of Communist bulls–t and weren’t going to put up with it like the Russians. The two Germanys idea was doomed because of brain drain. Anyone with a degree just hops the border and doesn’t have to put up with Communism. It becomes rather silly when you are trying to keep in doctors and technicians by threatening to rape their sisters. Yes that really happened. Not exactly a people’s Republic.

    • Replies: @Anon
  223. Pablo says:

    Does anyone know WHY it is only White People who think “Diversity is a strength” and Multiculturalism is a good thing. Facts don’t seem to matter to these people. The proof is there in Plain Sight. NONE of the Immigrant flood into the USA have any intention of joining a “multicultural” or Diverse Culture. They just wanna live in the USA. Only White People need to be “bred out” of the population. .

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  224. @AceDeuce

    And if a young black kept stalking an older white man at night it would most probably be to mug him. If an older white man stalked a young black at night … well he’d probably be some neighbourhood watch security patrol guy.

  225. Anon[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @Happy Tapir

    Perverts are a big part of the problem. You write like a Log Cabin Republican.

  226. Anon[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alvin

    It’s comments like this that make me realize that we have to educate young people. We can’t afford to wait for them to hit middle-age and be “mugged by reality.” I’m tired of the truth’s being discussed only by old fuddy-duddys in old-fashioned blog comments sections (with plenty of “I remember when” commentary and academic book references!). We’re only talking to each other here and to no one else.

    Here is an obviously young commenter, Alvin, taken in by BLM’s lies. At this incredibly late date, with all that is known about blacks and about the decades-old racial swindle, how could anyone, regardless of age, fail to reject BLM on its face as being yet another chimp-out? And yet young people like Alvin did so fail. Clearly no one helped Alvin, no one taught him, no one clued him in. No one bothered. Alone, he had to come to the correct conclusion himself. More knowledgeable people apparently kept their mouths resolutely closed. “Sink or swim,kid” seems to be our philosophy. No wonder the future is dark.

  227. @Brad Anbro

    I do not understand why people idolize Reagan.

    Were you alive then? I was, and as far as idolizing, who gives a damn about that. 4 additional years of the peanut farmer would’ve saw the US in a 2nd depression. Just because you can’t agree with someone’s path in leadership doesn’t mean they didn’t improve a horrific situation. The economic growth during his 8 years was nothing short incredible, even with the decisions he had to make for political survival.

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  228. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    “Anyone with a degree just hops the border and doesn’t have to put up with Communism.”

    I was not aware that a degree was a pass through the Berlin Wall. A degree in Zionism it must have been.

    “the Russians (still) don’t have democracy.”

    If that was a trivial problem during the Cold War, why is it so important to you today?

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  229. @Pablo

    Does anyone know WHY it is only White People who think “Diversity is a strength” and Multiculturalism is a good thing.

    You’re right, the stupid ones do. I had a liberal friend of mine rail on about socialism in certain European nations being successful throughout many decades during the time that said nations were culturally and ethnically homogenous. Now pointing out the regression, politically and economically of these nations now that they’ve opened their borders to every black and brown ass on the planet (much like the US) the stupid look, and no response is simply priceless to watch. There’s no valid argument for destroying what is good and working unless you’re trying to turn a thing into something else. The US inside of 30 years is going to be a third world toilet, and I for one think there are some people alive right now that are going to suffer severely for it.

  230. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brad Anbro

    It was not Americans who were behind the Soviet Union. It was (((Americans))).

    The Koch Brothers (think Ed Koch), famous neoconservative lobbyists, who inherited their pile from Daddy, are typical in this regard. Daddy made this fortune building industries in Russia for Stalin.

    Armand Hammer didn’t exactly descend from the Mayflower, and neither did Jacob Schiff.

    This list could be extended indefinitely, like Jacob’s ladder.

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  231. @Anon

    “Anyone with a degree just hops the border and doesn’t have to put up with Communism.”

    I was not aware that a degree was a pass through the Berlin Wall.

    It doesn’t. I was summarizing the problem of brain drain which was causing economic havoc for East Germany.

    The Communists provide “free college” and someone gets a nursing degree and then hops the border for a much higher standard of living in Western Germany.

    A basic laborer has more incentive to stay.

    The Communists were well aware of this problem and created artificial disincentives like threatening to kill or rape the relatives of skilled workers if they left. Some were even hunted inside West Germany. This would also happen to popular artists and writers. There is an excellent German film The Lives of Others which gives an inside look at how the Stasi would spy on potential ex-pats. An entire government department existed to prevent talented people from leaving. The pinnacle of state enforced egalitarianism.

    “the Russians (still) don’t have democracy.”

    If that was a trivial problem during the Cold War, why is it so important to you today?

    I support democracy and that is separate from any opinions I have on the cold war. For every Franco you get a loser like Putin that starts a needless war and can’t be removed. I think the founders were right though to not have a popular vote and basically leave landowners in charge.

  232. @Philmuhcrevis

    I graduated from high school in 1969. My generation was lied to about Vietnam and everything else since then.

    You talk about “economic growth” – I am assuming that you are referring to when Reagan was president. What “economic growth” are you talking about? The “economic growth” due to the American financial “industry,” whose main objective is, and always has been, to screw people out of their money and hard assets?

    I was in the job force when all of this “economic growth” took place. I witnessed first-hand how Rockford, Illinois, the area in which I worked my entire life, became an industrial ghost town, a situation that was repeated thousands of times across the United States, thanks to the greed of the financial “industry,” the greed of people running the corporations, off-shoring millions of jobs overseas, and the politicians of BOTH political parties, who passed laws and regulations making this worthwhile for the corporations.

    If you will take the time to research the United States’ balance of trade figures, beginning in the early 1970s the USA began having a NEGATIVE balance of trade. I believe that there was only one year in this time period when the balance of trade has been negative. The United States has become the world’s largest DEBTOR nation.

    Yes, I witnessed the “incredible” economic “growth” our country has experienced, thank you!

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Sparkon
  233. @Anon

    Correct on everything. Personally, I get in the “rut” of thinking that the “Jews” are behind all of this, but I have since learned that MANY non-Jews were working hand-in-hand WITH the Jews, as you mention.

    Thank you.

  234. You talk about “economic growth” – I am assuming that you are referring to when Reagan was president. What “economic growth” are you talking about? The “economic growth” due to the American financial “industry,” whose main objective is, and always has been, to screw people out of their money and hard assets?

    You’re about 16 years older than me I’d guess. And yes I was talking about the economic 180 the US made after the peanut farmer ran our economy into the ground doing what most dyed in wool bleeding heart liberals do when they get control. Our current situation isn’t much different. I watched my dad, a man with a good work ethic lose 3 jobs during that period and sit out of work for 18 months and nearly go insane. The funny part is my parents were democrats their entire life, my dad was born around a week after FDR was elected in 1932 and like so many boys who’s parents saw him as the next coming of Jesus Christ my grandparents named him Franklin Delano. I’m by no means calling Reagan a savior, but I know what I witnessed between 1981 and 1990, and for the most part it was positive from the cheap seats of where I was sitting. I changed political parties after Clinton’s first term after witnessing what can only be described in my opinion as two of the scummiest human beings alive inhabit the White House. I’m sure opinions vary on that but I’d seen enough of what liberals were doing to this nation and how fast it was changing to know I was wasn’t a democrat, or a liberal much to my mommy’s chagrin. I’d love to see more manufacturing and energy independence return to the US but our congress, regardless of party won’t allow it, a lot of it a direct result of the climate change bullshit. There are simply too many scumbag politicians, past and present that have become filthy stinking rich off of overseas business dealings. I think that may be something we have some common ground on.

  235. Sparkon says:
    @Brad Anbro

    President Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt during his two terms of office, and the United States went from being the world’s largest creditor nation to the world’s largest debtor nation in just 8 years.

    I don’t necessarily blame Reagan, because I think he’d already begun losing his admittedly small set of marbles during or even before his time as governor of California, and well before he was elected President in 1980.

    Months after he took office as governor, a reporter asked him about his priorities. Disconcerted, Reagan turned toward an assistant and said, “I could take some coaching from the sidelines, if anyone can recall my legislative program.” Expected to decide between conflicting views on the abortion issue, “Reagan,” Cannon noted, “behaved as if lost at sea.” His aides often found it difficult to get him to concentrate. On one occasion, in the midst of a vital discussion about the budget, he wandered off: “Do you know how hard it is to mispronounce ‘psychiatric’ once you know how to pronounce it right? I had to do it in Kings Row and at first I couldn’t do it.” He especially alarmed members of his staff by flying into a rage if the press reported that he had changed his position on an issue, even when he undoubtedly had. All of his disabilities—gross misperceptions and knowledge gaps—he carried into the White House. Yet he was to leave office regarded as a consequential president, and a number of scholars were even to write of an “Age of Reagan.”

    https://www.salon.com/2015/12/27/behind_the_ronald_reagan_myth_no_one_had_ever_entered_the_white_house_so_grossly_ill_informed_2/

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
    , @Brad Anbro
  236. @anonymous

    Jews are like the scorpion that stings the frog carrying it across the river, causing both to perish. The only ones more despicable than Jews are their apologists and enablers. Sadly, nearly everyone in the upper half of US society is included in those categories, which is why the country finds itself in such dire straits. The US could have been the China of the Western world: a gigantic, advanced, and enduring nation, but it will likely not see its 300th birthday in 2076 and possibly not even its 250th birthday. The US is the equivalent of a very promising young teen who becomes a drug-addicted male prostitute and is dead by 25.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  237. @Sparkon

    All of his disabilities—gross misperceptions and knowledge gaps—he carried into the White House. Yet he was to leave office regarded as a consequential president, and a number of scholars were even to write of an “Age of Reagan.”

    When I read stuff like this I’m reminded of the opening chat in the movie Braveheart.. “History is written by men who have hanged hero’s.”

    Listening to “Brandon” try and talk without a teleprompter and realizing the glairing disinterest by our media (sans Faux News) is all anyone needs to know about who is calling the shots, and have been for a long time. I remember on many occasions even as a kid watching Reagan take media reporters apart at the seems when they tried to rattle him. Proven by his debate performances, he was completely aware unlike the current idiot in the oval office, but amazingly 28% of our population still thinks he’s doing a good job. To be fair I guess with mess that Carter made nearly anyone could’ve won in 1980, but the debate between Reagan and Carter in my hometown wasn’t even a fair fight, Reagan beat him like a stepchild.

  238. @Ray Caruso

    The US could have been the China of the Western world: a gigantic, advanced, and enduring nation, but it will likely not see its 300th birthday in 2076 and possibly not even its 250th birthday. The US is the equivalent of a very promising young teen who becomes a drug-addicted male prostitute and is dead by 25.

    China has a huge advantage the US could never equal–one race in charge.

    Diversity is doom–we know that now.

    Some lessons can only be learned the hard way.

  239. @Sparkon

    Another “little detail” that most people do not know about Reagan is that the BROTHER of the so-called “lone nut” gunman that tried to assassinate Reagan was supposed to have dinner with a member of the Bush family that night or the next night. I am not sure of the exact date of the dinner engagement. But the Hinckleys were very close to the Bush family.

    I think that the assassination attempt was an effort to “put the fear of God” into Reagan and not an effort to kill him. Just a not-so-subtle hint by the Powers that be to just go along with things, until they could get their man into office…

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  240. I think that the assassination attempt was an effort to “put the fear of God” into Reagan and not an effort to kill him. Just a not-so-subtle hint by the Powers that be to just go along with things, until they could get their man into office…

    Just a question, not trying to start an argument. The letters that Hinckley wrote to Jodi Foster, do you believe that was staged by the government or do you think he actually wrote them? I mean honestly at that point what reason other than HW becoming president would the Bush’s want Reagan dead? He was a pretty popular president during his tenure proven by his electoral vote counts in both of his wins. I can see your point about the hint, in my opinion had Hinckley not used a 22lr caliber pistol, Reagan would have probably been starched that day. The thing that always gave me pause was how a douche bag like JH jr. got close enough to get even one shot off.

  241. Sparkon says:
    @Brad Anbro

    Yes, reputed assassin John Hinckley Jr. somehow penetrated two layers of normal security, and got within ~15-20 feet of President Reagan before opening fire with six shots from his snub-nose revolver, a weapon type not known for its accuracy.

    All those shots missed Reagan, but the “…sixth and final bullet ricocheted off the armored side of the limousine, passed between the space of the open rear door and vehicle frame, and hit the president in the left underarm.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Ronald_Reagan

    In other words, save for an improbable ricochet, one could argue that Hinckley wasn’t really trying to kill Reagan at all, or even shoot him.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
    , @Brad Anbro
  242. @Sparkon

    Everything in this country is a goddamn conspiracy. Lol.. Couldn’t have been that this idiot was actually trying to get Jodi Foster’s attention, nooooooo……

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  243. Sparkon says:
    @Philmuhcrevis

    What part of getting Jodie Foster’s attention allowed Hinckley to penetrate Pres. Reagan’s normal security?

    And what were you thinking when you chose your handle?

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  244. @RadicalCenter

    Thanks for corrcting me. Facts matter.

  245. @Sparkon

    Thanks for the comments. I do not believe anything that Wikipedia says about anything controversial. I very much believe that the CIA goes over everything they publish and makes “corrections” to its liking.

    • Agree: Justvisiting
    • Replies: @Sparkon
  246. @Sparkon

    What part of getting Jodie Foster’s attention allowed Hinckley to penetrate Pres. Reagan’s normal security?

    I said that? Him trying to get her attention just proves that he’s a flipping loon. It just always seemed strange to me that with all of the security that they didn’t seem to notice this clown. He in my opinion should’ve never been released, especially for how Brady suffered after all that.

  247. Excuse me, I missed this comment – wholly unintentional.

    “So, an unfamiliar White teen who doesn’t live in the crime-plagued private community is wandering around rather aimlessly at night and an older black adult, who does live there, starts to watch him and follow him to see where he’s going.

    If every other detail remains the same, only the races swapped, the nigros and their cuck White enablers will side 100% with the formerly White/currently black side, and condemn the original black/currently White person–they will will spout off a million reasons in defense of their opinions. Swap the races back to the original, and none of those reasons are valid any longer.”

    ——————————

    In response, my position remains the same. An adult male following a young man around in the dark without ever identifying himself is stalking. And should that young man decide to confront after several attempts to evade said adult – he has reasonable cause for doing so. That confrontation regardless of how ill advised is an act of self defense. And should that young man be killed in defending himself, in my view said adult would be responsible for at least a manslaughter charge. Exacerbated by the knowledge that the police had instructed said adult not to follow him. Further exacerbated would be the knowledge that supposed adult was a trained member of neighborhood watch — an organization who primary benefit is the prevention of illegal activity, not their intervention – that they live to the police. Stalking after being told not to — needless intervention and provocation.

    Nothing of this kind of conduct

    “Or, a 14 year old White punk kid, in front of other people, grabs a young married black store clerk while she’s working and grinds up against her, while talking sexual schitt. Her tough black husband finds out about it.”

    was cited and further, even the woman in question denies any physical contact. And should that have actually occurred the kidnapping and murder of the young man woud still be a violation of the law.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  248. @EliteCommInc.

    Here’s how strong the accusations are against Emmet Till, note the arrest warrant for the accuser for false accusation

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/us/emmett-till-warrant-discovered/index.html

    Now that warrant was not issued by the Federal Government, but by the investigating local authority. It seems more likely that even the local authorities upon examination uncovered the truth and sought to arrest, even the accuser, but subsequently in lieu of the time and place — opted to let matters ride. The original police report and affidavit are missing.

    This is an old tale some black man or kid does something that offends some white person of a “relational nature” involving a some woman and whites routinely lose their minds, that only the young man lost his life in response, so far as we know, is in all likihood a blessing or missed opportunity —

    It is what causes attorney Generals to hop skip and leap through court yards and office buildings to make sure the offending black administrator watches how he talks to a white secretary. It’s the foundation for the Pres. of the US to entreat a Supreme Court justice not to downvote school segregation on the view that parents don’t want their little girls sitting next to some big black buck (paraphrased). It’s 2022 and police are still stopping black males on the premise of defending some white woman.

    Apparently, even talking or smiling when passing was a problem.
    https://calendar.eji.org/racial-injustice/mar/22

    I am keenly aware that the Emmet Till case is old news, but the core gaming

    — offended white women —

    has served the nation well in ensuring african americans live in some manner of fear, for merely being human.

    Here’s the old statistics hat trick to reinforce an old stereotypical notion.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/stupid-racist-meme-rape-black-men-2016-10

  249. Sparkon says:
    @Brad Anbro

    Please do provide a better source about the attempted assassination if you’ve got one. See below. Otherwise, just dismissing the Wikipedia article out of hand makes discussion about the event difficult if not impossible.

    In general, I find Wikipedia to be a good starting point. After that, it’s gloves off, and anyone can whale away at it, pointing out the lies, incongruities and so on, but we’ve got to start somewhere, else it’s just a big cop-out, as my generation called it.

    Rather than throwing out the baby with the bathwater, if you’ll forgive the cliché, I prefer to zero in on and call out those incongruities and/or bald-faced lies wherever and whenever they appear, and that applies to Wikipedia, the MSM, and even comments at UR.

    So, for example, we might talk a little about that ricochet that allegedly hit Pres. Reagan. Without the improbable ricochet, Pres. Reagan would have escaped unscathed.

    I call it improbable because usually, when hitting armor, most standard rounds flatten and splatter. Therefore, I have a hard time understanding how said round was able to penetrate Pres.. Reagan’s body and end up, reportedly, just an inch from his heart. Could the deformed splatters from a small caliber round really do that?

    Does the geometry of the alleged ricochet even work? I’d like to see a diagram showing where everyone was standing when Hinckley opened fire. Anyone?

    Recall Bobby Kennedy’s assassination, where patsy Sirhan Sirhan went into “range mode,” and charged in, firing wildly and creating a huge distraction, while the fatal shot was fired by an assassin standing directly behind Mr. Kennedy, so-called security guard Thane Eugene Cesar.

    And that leads us here:

    “There are two shooters in the Reagan assassination attempt, not one. I give you photographic evidence and eye-witness evidence of a second man standing on a balcony holding a gun, who can clearly be seen in the uncropped photos and I traced many of the connections of the Bushes to the Hinckleys. It’s more than you’ve been told.”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/author-roger-stones-latest-conspiracy-theory-george-h-w-bush-behind-reagan-assassination-attempt/

    I daresay it is.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
How America was neoconned into World War IV
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement