The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
The Fight for Free Speech Is a Fight for Civilization
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Some may think this is an overstatement:

I don’t.

James Burnham and the Machiavellian tradition show that the truth doesn’t always, or even often, win in politics. However, having the truth on your side does come with tactical advantages. It means white advocates can defend free speech not just from principle, but for political advantage. If we can speak, we win. It’s our opponents who are spreading dangerous misinformation of race denial and the huge conspiracy theory that is known as “white privilege.”

Even (especially) if we were in power, I’d be a free speech absolutist. The 2015–2016 presidential campaign was an example of what free speech can accomplish.

Our opponents seem to think it was, too. They are afraid that Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover will mean more free speech, and unlike in 2015–2016, they are pushing repression right away.

Mr. Musk has tweeted frequently about the importance of free speech:

We will see if “The Twitter Files” tell the story of Jared Taylor and American Renaissance.

Oddly enough, journalists aren’t writing stories about a brave immigrant from Africa who is defending democratic values. Instead, they talk about Mr. Musk as if he were a threat to the Republic. There are three directions of attack: from government, corporations, and from “activists.”

Elon Musk (Credit Image: © Brendan Smialowski/La Nacion via ZUMA Press)
Elon Musk (Credit Image: © Brendan Smialowski/La Nacion via ZUMA Press)

The latter are the most outspoken. The Anti-Defamation League, after reportedly meeting with Mr. Musk on content moderation policies, evidently decided he didn’t grovel enough. It and the NAACP are promoting a boycott. “Any remaining advertiser that cares about brand safety should join the exodus of major companies that have already pulled their ads off Twitter,” said one activist quoted by CBS News. The Washington Post’s Taylor Lorenz warned that Mr. Musk was about to open the “gates of hell,” and quoted an activist who demanded that Google and Apple consider “booting Twitter off the app store.” Conservative Seth Dillon alleged that the activist in question had previously called for the justices who overturned Roe v. Wade to “never have a peaceful moment in public again.” Claims about “safety” are thus hard to take seriously. It’s a power play.

“Good for Apple” has been trending for about two days, even after it was shown Apple helped the Chinese Communist Party crack down on anti-lockdown protesters. Apple pulling advertising might be a blow to Twitter, but the true threat would be banning it from the App Store. That is what destroyed Parler. Governor Ron DeSantis said such a move would be a “really raw exercise of monopolistic power that I think would merit a response from the United States Congress.” However, while some in the GOP-controlled House might tweet or fundraise if Twitter were banned, action is unlikely. The GOP and Donald Trump did nothing but grandstand about free speech when they had power — even when social media kicked off their most dedicated supporters.

Political activism often leads to economic blackmail. Mr. Musk has said that Apple pulled its advertising and is in fact threatening to close Twitter out of the App Store. The Tesla TecnoKing tried to shame Steve Jobs’s old company on free speech grounds.

It didn’t work. Progressives love censorship, and there will be more of it. According to Pew, 62 percent of teenagers think “being able to feel welcome and safe online” merits censorship, while only 38 percent think it’s more important that people are able to “speak their minds freely online.” The poll also reported that 50 percent of adults put “safety” over freedom and only 47 percent don’t.

Free Speech Is Killing Us” wrote a New York Times columnist in a 2019, arguing that extremist speech online leads to real-world violence. “Musk’s Twitter amnesty raises new fears over online hate,” said Axios yesterday: “Civil rights groups” are outraged. “Critics of Musk’s approach say that he is asking for civil debates where the starting point is inherently un-civil, as when people express white supremacy or equate LGBTQ identity with child abuse.”

Of course, claiming certain views are inherently “uncivil” shows the flaw of liberal democracy. Carl Schmitt showed that the state can never be “neutral.” Those who run democracies make value judgments and show bias, even if they deny it. Who defines “white supremacy,” if that is to be banned? Maybe it has no real definition, just like “racism.”

Defending free speech is not just principled, it’s practical. It’s how we question assumptions and find the best ways to solve problems. If we can’t discuss things honestly, we’ll never find solutions — especially to racial problems.

“We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it,” said Thomas Jefferson. However, the System enshrines error about the American Dilemma. If anything productive, good, and beautiful is “white supremacist” and a challenge to “equity,” we won’t have a society that values those things. It will be a society of professional victims, dependent on the cowardice of whites who feed them.

We are right on race and our opponents are wrong. “The science,” is on our side. However, it’s not clear if American society would survive frank discussion of race. Too many powerful interests depend on Americans’ believing things that are not true. The desire to censor the truth about race seems more important than the fight for “democracy” we’ve been lectured on so much in the midterm elections.

On the heels of political activism and economic threats will come government action from the Left. At a White House Press Conference this week, a reporter asked a question that sounded more like a plea for censorship.

You know, there’s a researcher at Stanford who says that this is a critical moment, really, in terms of ensuring that Twitter does not become a vector for misinformation. . . . Are you concerned about that? And what tools do you have? Who is it at the White House that is really keeping track of this?

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre answered:

So, look, this is something that we’re certainly keeping an eye on. And . . . when it comes to social media platforms, it is their responsibility to make sure that when it comes to misinformation, when we — when it comes to the hate that we’re seeing, that they take action, that they continue to take action. . . .

And the President has been very clear on calling that out. He’ll continue to do that. And we’re going to continue to monitor the situation.

Who is inciting violence against whom? The latest National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) showed the black share of black/white violence is so great that black person was 35 times more likely to attack a white than the other way around. Anti-white attitudes in government, media, and online are mainstream; we chronicle outright anti-white incitement on Twitter almost every week.

The implicit (and occasionally explicit) argument from so-called civil rights activists is that free speech causes violence against “marginalized” groups. Those are precisely the groups that get privileges in hiring and education. Progressives would probably ignore both crime and affirmative-action data altogether — and still keep telling us to “follow (their) science.”

The demands for censorship and claims of danger are coming from those who are stirring up anti-white animus. If “civil rights” activists truly believe that negative speech leads to blood, the blood of countless whites is on their hands.

Free speech is a free society’s way of avoiding violence. However, if our right to speak is taken away while others are free to say inflammatory (and false) things about us, that crosses a fatal line: Political opponents become existential enemies, and that’s something no one of good will wants. Let’s hope there are still enough Americans who want to protect the rights every other generation took for granted.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
Hide 96 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Rich says:

    We are right, our arguments are sound and that’s why they favor censorship. We’ll have to wait to see where this ends, but, oddly enough, many of the younger people I speak to are beginning to question Jewish power because of their flagrant attacks on free speech. The ugliness of their leader, Greenblatt, doesn’t help their image, either.

    • Replies: @The_Masterwang
  2. >>We will see if “The Twitter Files” tell the story of Jared Taylor and American Renaissance.

    Honestly, he can burn. Anyone who names the jew in his comments section is banned permanently. He deserves the punishment he gets for obeying his masters. “Even the best of the gentiles should be killed,” said Shimon ben Yohai in Kiddushin, 4:11, 66c. They don’t care how much anyone grovels. If you’re not one of them, you’re an animal in human form and should die. Taylor’s a gatekeeper, either wittingly or unwittingly. “Jews look white to me,” is race treason.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    , @SicSemper
  3. Exile says:

    I’m not fighting for “free speech” – I want White men to be able to speak about White interests in White nations.

    America’s biggest problem is not “censorship” – it’s the fact that non-Whites oppress Whites in their own countries (and silence their complaints about it).

    Look at what happened with Tommy Robinson’s “Day of Freedom” shitshow when he bone-headedly tried to platform an anti-British Muslim immigrant to show how dedicated he was to “free speech.” British Whites were righteously outraged.

    AmRen, Taylor and Hood can’t prioritize between being pro-White and being civic nationalists. They cannot let go of muh Constitution and quasi-libertarian/paleocon shibboleths. This piece is just one example.

    Whites have a moral right to homelands they control. Sometimes that includes telling people what they can’t say (e.g. Jews deconstructing every White hero, tradition or value).

    We fight censorship to point out the hypocrisy of those who illegitimately hold power in our homelands in the name of “colorblind values for all citizens” (when in fact that’s a hypocritical anti-White, pro-Jewish, pro-Colored of Person racket).

    Not because “free speech is a fight for civilization.” That’s (((Breitbart))) goy-feed. White civilization existed without “free speech” for millennia.

    Whites have typically allowed for more open political debate and dissent than other races, but that is not the center of our present struggle.

    • Agree: Tallest Skil
    • Replies: @Tallest Skil
  4. @Exile

    >>They cannot let go of muh Constitution and quasi-libertarian/paleocon shibboleths.

    I mean, the Constitution was written by whites, for whites, and the authors publicly said that it does not apply to nonwhites. That used to be enough for white people to comprehend. It was implicit. It was so ingrained in our psyches that we couldn’t even formulate the idea of it ever being a question. Just like the idea of marriage being male and female only and the idea of women not being men (legally, physically, or socially) were so fundamentally obvious that they didn’t even warrant a comment.

    Only a jew is capable of questioning the unquestionable or refuting the objective. It’s a concept foreign to whites, and so they’re greatly able to abuse our psychology by intellectually intruding in this way. The Constitution isn’t the problem. The laziness of modern people in demanding that objective truth be spelled out verbatim is the problem. The unwillingness of modern people to simply say, “No.” and fucking shoot the man dressed as a woman when he demands to be treated as one is the problem. Et cetera.

    • Replies: @Exile
  5. anarchyst says:

    Q: What do elderly women Monika Schaefer and Ursula Haverbeck have in common?
    A: They have served hard time in German maximum-security prisons for questioning “that which may not be questioned”–the so-called “holocaust©”.
    “Holocaustianity©” has been weaponized and turned into a state “religion” from which no dissent from its “holy writs” will be tolerated. Despite PROOF that the outlandish, impossible claims made by its adherents are physically impossible, not scientifically possible and never occurred, it is still “against the law” in Germany and in many other countries (including Canada) to question its “holy writs”.
    Those unfortunate enough to be prosecuted cannot bring evidence into court proving their position. A dishonest judicial “trick” is that of “judicial notice” which declares that the “commonly accepted narrative” must always be accepted, (even if it can be proven false).
    Legal representatives have been found in “contempt of court” for attempting to introduce evidence countering outlandish and false “holocaust©” claims.
    You see, the “holocaust©” cash cow is in peril as many of its recipients are dying off due to old age.
    There is a new scam being perpetrated by the “holocaust©” reparations crowd called “holocaust©” transference syndrome. Two psychiatrists came up with this scam to keep the “holocaust©” fable alive. According to these two, descendants of “holocaust©” survivors are afflicted with this syndrome and should also receive “holocaust©” reparations as well. Even unrelated people of this particular ethnicity / belief system can “catch” this syndrome. In this way, the “holocaust©” scam can exist in perpetuity.
    Chutzpah, anyone?
    The TRUTH cannot abide censorship…

  6. Thomasina says:

    Most of this progressive nonsense was paid for and orchestrated by the elites (BLM, Antifa, Trans) because it benefited them, just like Covid, the rigged elections, climate change, and the war in Ukraine. All of this crap would be dropped and crushed in a second if they didn’t need it to divide everyone.

    We all have our public lives, our private lives, and then our secret lives. Secretly, ALL of these politicians are in lock-step, they’re on the same page, but publicly they pretend there’s a difference between them, that democracy exists.

    The Republicans don’t moan and kick the ground because they’re timid. They’re paid-off whores, actors playing their parts alongside their Democrat buddies. Notice how the Republicans were virtually absent during the last election. Notice how silent they’ve been on the illegals pouring across the border. Notice how an idiot and sell-out like Mitch McConnell always wins. All rigged. “We’ll pretend our hands are tied because we don’t control the Senate. That way the progressive scam can continue on under the Dodo in Chief.”

    While the elite are choking on the riches they’re stealing, we’re getting distracted by nonsense. The elite are implementing their Great Reset, further monopolization, tighter controls and censorship, a welcome mat out to the Third World, and a one-world government. How smug they are.

    Boycott every company who is against free speech. Don’t buy a thing from them.

    • Agree: A. Clifton, RockaBoatus
  7. @anarchyst

    According to these two, descendants of “holocaust©” survivors are afflicted with this syndrome and should also receive “holocaust©” reparations as well.

    …and descendants of “Naqba©” survivors also receive “Naqba©” reparations ad infinitum (more correctly: those “reparations” disappear in the pockets of the ruling “elites”), a scam I’ve already spoken of ; and quite recently my wife told me (I never listen/look at Belgian “news”) that the Belgian govt is considering paying “reparations” to the Congolese survivors, a scam I’ve already spoken of , the said “reparations” being as ridiculous and unjustified as those to the “Naqba©”

  8. Exile says:
    @Tallest Skil

    The Constitution used to work because America used to be a White country. White America worked because it was White, not because it had muh Constitution.

    Greg Hood knows this, but he either playing the “trick the normies into taking their own side” game or he’s lost sight of things we all recognized as fundamental in the long ago days of 2016 – back when AmRen was about White racial advocacy, not the pseudo-libertarian patriot boilerplate they so often parrot nowadays.

    • Agree: Tallest Skil
    • Replies: @AndrewR
  9. Naming the Jewish Power is the fight for civilization.

    • Agree: RockaBoatus
  10. Cook says:

    The Africans have a lot to teach us about free speech, especially where it comes to parliamentary debate.

  11. Karl1906 says:

    Why should we trust Musk to fight a battle for free speech? He’s always been a part of the problem and not the solution.

    I very much doubt that any of his class of pervertly rich and criminal capitalists will ever fall out of line. There never have been any examples and there certainly won’t be now while these people consider themselves to be “untouchable” and unstoppable (just look at Gates or Bezos). They will make sure that Musk returns to their flock. If not worse and this is all a diversion with him having a laugh at our expense for believing such an obvious fraud* like him.

    * Just have a look how he got so rich.

  12. anon[134] • Disclaimer says:

    The (((same people))) who are whining about free speech today are the same ones who argued to get pornography legalized because it is free speech. And SCOTUS agreed with them! So pornography is “free speech”, but saying you don’t agree with mass immigration or abortion or LGBTQ lifestyle is an “act of violence”. Only in America. We deserve our own demise.

  13. I find it amazing that our nation’s wealthiest citizen, and most successful African-American, must fight for free speech, and few politicians support him!

  14. They’re ALL in on THIS!!

    • Thanks: Agent76
  15. Guns and free speech. Without them you get tyranny. Sure as the sunrise.

  16. Biff23 says:

    “If we can speak, we win.”

    Nope. White’s can’t win because they are: a) massively outnumbered globally, b) already a minority under age 18, c) soon to be a minority overall, and d) split into two roughly equal groups one of which hates itself.

    Democracy is the noose the PoC will lynch whitey with. They’re already slavering over the ripe pickings for reparations. The entire country was stolen from PoC, after all.

    You can’t appeal for fair treatment either. They will reply: “Were your thieving, slaving, racist ancestors fair?”

    It’s like a cancer patient. There comes a point where thinking you can “win” is malpractice and delusion. It’s a disservice to the people who will deal with the horrors of the inevitable loss. Leading them down the primrose path. Admitting that you’re going to lose is the first step in dealing with reality.

  17. @anarchyst

    “You see, the “holocaust©” cash cow is in peril as many of its recipients are dying off due to old age. There is a new scam being perpetrated by the “holocaust©” reparations crowd called “holocaust©” transference syndrome” – This is true. My friend’s daughter attended a group therapy session a while back and relayed how she met a woman who was a “Holocaust survivor” at the meeting. I inquired how old the woman was, and she estimated her age around 50 years old.

    I informed my friend’s daughter that the woman’s claims were false and that she was no “Holocaust survivor.” She informed me that since the woman’s grandparents had experienced the Holocaust, the sufferings they endured were automatically transferred to her.

    Only an arrogant and conniving Jew could think of such a scheme and present it with a straight face!

  18. A world of taxcattle existing in the the absolute darkness of the shadows of enlightenment can’t possibly claim civilization for itself. Musk isn’t an Atlantean risen from the depths of the pit for the sake of mankind nor is Twitter any sorta deus ex machina instrument of salvation. Fuck it, even the Buybull says quite intently that “my people suffer for lack of…”

    As a good individual representative of the nature of the terrorist USEUNATO conglomerate, Musk brings nothing at all to the table when it comes to guiding people in the path of weighing the reality and the illusory in regards to their “rights and freedoms”, but good merchandising for his newest acquisition.

    But I digress, for it’s certainly very nice to get paid for speaking mountains of bullshit.

  19. The video of the White Press hack listing the winners of the ‘Noble’ prizes who met Brandon, is hilarious. How do you live that long, and not know how to pronounce ‘Nobel’? The creature in charge of US nuclear waste, Sam Brinton, is quite a confection, too. Are there no intelligent lesbians and ‘gender fluid’ people suitable to be employed?

  20. @René Fries

    So, you’re a Zionazi then. No surprise. The descendants of the Nakba deserve only that International Law be observed and their Right of Return to their homes be implemented. Having your beloved Zionazistan cease killing, torturing and maiming their people, stealing their land, destroying their homes, killing their animals, stealing their water etc, would be nice, too.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  21. GMC says:

    Free speech has been attacked because of the Media monopolies and the the sell out of Washington politicians and of course , all the non elected heads of these Zionist Agencies. Circumventing the Constitution and Bill of Rights with all these BS Laws, should have awaken all the people , but it has Not.

    Which brings us to this next question : This Multi-Polar World looks fine and dandy for those Countries involved, but is this Multi Polar only going to be for the good of these Governments, their Corporate partnerships, and their international ties and economic systems. But what about the Populations in this New M P W ? Are they going to have the same multi rights and freedoms, or are they going to get stuck in the same Uni Polar world that they live in today. ? The USA EU, and most other countries have shown that Constitutions and governing laws can be changed at any time. And those changes usually take more freedoms away. International air travel is a great example , but also infects trains, busses, and sea transportation as well. If the MPW is to replace the Uni Polar World Order then the populations need to have a unconditional Multi Polar Bill of Rights also. And Free Speech is always the first right to be attacked.

  22. I have nothing in common with people who oppose the first amendment. Which would be Okay except they hate me and want to harm me. In my view they are like zombies. Stupid, ugly and dangerous. You don’t try to live with zombies. You escape them or you destroy them. I have neither the desire nor the ability to destroy them.

    I am a Separatist. From a distance I could pity the zombies. They were, after all, once human like me. And they didn’t choose to be zombies. They were bitten.

  23. Anonymous[374] • Disclaimer says:

    The ACLU-ADL-YouTube-Snopes-Google-Instagram-etc. must thank Yahweh hourly that 1933-45 Germany emulated them by successfully censoring toxic Yidthought. I mean, think what might have happened if the Third Reich protected free speech and Juden were allowed to rebut every antisemitic charge!

    Also, what a mitzvah that Adolf supported CNN-clones who repeatedly aired “fact-checked” documentaries like this one, right?

    Odd, though, how eternal-victim Jews somehow ended up recently all speaking together onstage about stamp collecting and the proper way to braise barbecue at a 4-H county fair.

    No wait: they shtetl-ensembled at a Jew York Times event for “icons of business” and “changemakers” with “influential minds.” Who were they? Why…

    Andrew Ross Sorkin
    Janet Yellin
    Voldemort Zelenskyy
    Andy Jassy
    Mark Zuckerborg

    All devout Amish farmers who love America to (30) pieces. And shekels.

    Now, I know what you’re thinking: “I thought Juden had no clout!” And I can’t blame you. The Torah Tribe does ceaselessly kvetch (on tribally-controlled media) that it suffers [and for no good reason!] endless horrors. Who inflicts the pain? Powerful Christians who mask their whip-hands by living in Appalachian shacks, driving trucks, cleaning sewers, and doing similar subhuman-goy tasks.

    The truth is, the Nose lies. And often openly. Because antijesusites know cheek-turning Xtian cucks will do nothing.


  24. Muskrat is scum

  25. AndrewR says:
    @Tallest Skil

    It’s treason to humanity.

  26. AndrewR says:

    You’re stupid and probably a Jewish subversive. The US Constitution might be the most brilliant document ever written.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  27. Dumbo says:

    I don’t think total free speech is possible, or even desirable. Those in power and even the society in general will always try to limit what is allowed, sometime for bad, sometimes for good reasons. The question is more what’s censored.

    The debate for “free speech” has mostly focused on allowing porn and violence, which should righty be restricted or censored. Or in religious blasphemy, which ideally should be avoided (even though it probably shouldn’t be restricted by law).

    The focus of recent censorship, on the other hand, has been on political or historical events, such as immigration or the Holocaust. There’s no reason why those questions shouldn’t be openly debated.

  28. And to all you commenters, how many of you finally realize that it is your cooperation with the gov’t that allows this travesty to occur. You keep voting in these overlords and then bitch and moan as they keep screwing you.

    How many of you are anarchists, anarchists to the bone? If your not an anarchist, you are part of the problem.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  29. P.T. says:

    Free speech is suppressed by various outlets. An acquaintance of mine who supports communism has failed to get some of his letters to the editor and his posts printed by conservative publications.

  30. @AndrewR

    You failed to mention the constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

  31. Von Rho says:

    EM is anarcho-capitalist, so the “free speech” is only the “f*u” for society. I the case of problems, the digital militia of these new lords destroy the opposition.

  32. anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:

    As loathsome as the Jews are, they know they can always count upon a strong contingent of pseudo-intellectual Whites to stand in fierce judgment of those Whites who stand up to the beanies. It’s why Whites are likely doomed. White civilization is a termite-infested house divided against itself. Plus, the Muslims were right about not letting women get too much institutional power. As soon as they had it, White women turned on their men and children.

    • Agree: Anonydogg
  33. Petermx says:

    I don’t know much about Steve Jobs, so I could be wrong, but I have a feeling Tim Cook, the current CEO who took over when Jobs died, and Steve Jobs’ own wife, who inherited his wealth, are very different than Steve Jobs. I think he could be very difficult, and I’m glad I never had to work for him, but I admire him for what he achieved. I think he supported free speech, and I don’t think he was very political, and he didn’t virtue signal, something that makes many left-wing weasels disgusting to me. I think Steve Jobs’ wife and Tim Cook fit that description.

  34. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:

    I wrote a letter to Jared Taylor explaining to him that 250 years of the First Amendment and free speech has not saved the ethnic Europeans from dysgenics, mutational load, cultural degeneration, and their coming collapse and possible extinction. As I understand it, genetic “losers” speak, while genetic “winners” fight. Ethnic Europeans innately no longer can collectively fight for their common ethnic interests and well-being, and talking and “hiding” behind the First Amendment won’t change anything. There has been absolute free speech on the internet for the last 25 years – a quarter of a century. Even before there was any hate-speech laws back in 1860 AD, the European-Americans still had a civil war for the purpose of converting America into a diversified multi-ethnic/multi-cultural nation.

    What’s my point? I don’t know. I don’t think I have one. On one hand, I value the persistence of entities such as American Renaissance to keep on fighting to the very end. On the other hand . . . well, I don’t think there are any other hands. So, keep on fighting.


    • Replies: @anon
    , @Old Brown Fool
  35. @mulga mumblebrain

    So you are a woke useful idiot then. Why should the descendants of the 750.000 victims of the so-called “Naqba” (which, as I pointed out, was of ARAB making) “deserve only that International Law be observed and their Right of Return to their homes be implemented”, whilst the descendants of the 850.000 Jews ejected from the Arab countries are not even spoken of?

    By the way, the so-called “Palestinians” in their overwhelming majority, are the descendants of Arab immigrants who came into Palestine at the same time as the Jews from Europe (as I pointed out also), the true Palestinians – original Cana’aneans if you wish – being the Jews as I also pointed out already.

    Your stance on the “climate” scam is the same as that on the “Palestine” scam, not that it is any wonder.

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    , @Anonymous
  36. Yet more blathering on a less than influential website instead of putting the guns you lot worship at the service of your “race realist” agenda. No wonder the rainbow haired liberal freaks are wiping the floor with your collective arse.

  37. profnasty says:

    I will accept the principle of Free Speech just so long as you worship me as a G_d.

    [And never let me hear you say the word ‘Hitler’ except as insult.]

  38. profnasty says:

    And what about chattel slavery, ie mortgage contracts?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  39. anastasia says:

    The only way to stop this censorship is to sue the government, showing with good evidence, that the tech companies are engaging in censorship at the behest and under the threat of the government. Whether overtly or subtlely, the tech companies are being threatened with fallacious government accusations and bogus lawsuits by the government of illegal acts by any tech company that doesn’t comply with the demands of the government to censor. The tech companies in the way they conduct business with foreign countries leave themselves wide open to all kinds of lawsuits by the government.

    There is plenty of evidence to show that the tech companies act under duress. Plenty.

  40. It’s our opponents who are spreading dangerous misinformation of race denial and the huge conspiracy theory that is known as “white privilege.”

    “White privilege” is not a “conspiracy theory” A conspiracy is by definition concocted in secrecy. WP is part of a massive propaganda show launched and backed openly and brazenly by the power centers. And and race denialism isn’t “misinformation,” it’s just the stupidest piece of the Big Lie that we’re hit with 24×7. Conspiracy theory and misinformation are meta-political tools of the left and the terms no longer function other than as moral posturing. Don’t fall into the trap of using them: it merely fortifies the left,

  41. @profnasty

    If you enter a contract without any coercion, then you should live up to what you agreed to. Look at the fools that got mortgages since 2008 and especially those that did so since the covid era began. They increased their debt load on an “asset” that is sure to decline as inflation rises. The Fed’s actions in 2008 and especially those in 2020 guaranteed price inflation and their inevitable tightening on the velocity of currency which means interest rates go up. As they go up, buyers become scarce and the value of the asset declines. Maybe some got lucky and nominally got a profit, but then they plowed it into the stock market or another property to once again put their wealth in jeopardy due to forces they can’t control.

    No one owns a home in the US. You rent it from the gov’t and your property tax bill is your eternal mortgage that you can never pay off. If you have property that is income producing, then you have an income stream to possibly stay ahead of inflation and taxes and I don’t include rental property. In the near future, I expect the gov’t will mandate that homes with spare facilities will be forced to take in the homeless and those that are going to become homeless in the near future. The rent moratorium should have convinced people that what they consider their property is an illusion. As conditions keep deteriorating, gov’t will respond by an ever increasing demand on those that have to support those that don’t.

  42. Anonymous[157] • Disclaimer says:

    AndrewR, that constitution – it’s gone, you’re not getting it back. It got revoked for good by the impunity provisions of the Central Intelligence Agency Act back in ’59.

    And it was pretty good for the days of yore when they thought it up but no country has used it as a model for a century now. So it’s obsolete and halfassed and fixated on government nuts and bolts instead of your rights.

    Nowadays what grownup countries do is affirm the the UN Charter, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute. That is the bare minimum requirement to pass the international laugh test. Once you’ve done that, you’re a sovereign state, then you can put on your periwig and dick around with institutional minutiae in your conventions.

    So if you’re still talking about the first amendment and not the world standard, Article 19 and 20, you brand yourself as a politically helpless goober.

    • Replies: @Agent76
  43. We need to be able to speak freely about the Holohoax, jewish machinations, and black/brown inferiority. Many White gentiles have had their eyes opened during the past 10 years or so, but much more work needs to be done. It starts with being able to discuss these topics freely and truthfully.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  44. HT says:

    A country controlled by Marxist Jews will continue to lose its basic constitutional rights. Lack of rights such as free speech is a result not a cause. This is just what a Marxist Jew society looks like.

  45. Most people don’t actually support free speech. That includes most Unz posters.

    They only support free speech when they find it politically desirable.

    Most men are weak as they follow weak ideologies and are afraid of letting the opposition talk.

    In Putin’s Russia you can be hauled off in the night for criticizing the government. His supporters here cheer his every move while complaining about mainstream media censorship.

    They don’t actually support free speech. They want a different ruling power to suppress the speech of their enemies.

    It’s all the same weakness. A CNN producer doing everything to prevent the viewer from knowing the facts of a racial case or an UNZ Putin defender doing damage control for the dictator.

    Most people are incapable of free speech as their innate desire to suppress their opposition is inextricable from their illusory ideals.

    • Replies: @HT
  46. Elon Musk says he wants free speech, but his track record suggests otherwise

    Musk’s free speech advocacy seems to apply mostly to his own speech or that of his fans and promoters.

    When it comes to his employees’ free speech, Musk demonstrates little tolerance.

    Musk has repeatedly sought control over what journalists, bloggers, analysts and other researchers say about his businesses, their products, and himself.


    What Are Elon Musk’s Views on Free Speech?

    They’re hardly cut-and-dried.

    • Thanks: Agent76
    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
    , @Agent76
  47. @Zachary Smith

    They all do (censor).
    The long sleep talker on economics around here – Michael Hudson – censors.
    Some “truthers” do not allow comments at all.
    Unz censors.
    Pepe censors.
    The best one is the great champion of free speech, Andrew Wee Anglin:
    If one wanted to comment one had to apply and explain ones intentions to him and he would then consider you worthy or not. (I would never ever – under no circumstances – censor Anglin, (the No. 1 Musk shill): “Elon”).
    Wait – there is even a better one – the Saker! The Saker’s commenting policy is an outstanding example of fascism. (If one wants to understand what fascism is, read the Saker’s commenting policy).

    Apart from that “free speech” seems more and more irrelevant. It seems fostered like multiculturalism – the bastardization and atomization of peoples. The Babylonian times: Sodom and Gomorrah of free speech: let em talk and talk and we do as we please while they are discussing their “free speech”. Free speech or not – it all does not seem to really matter anymore; or only if you have a real reach (you will somehow vanish or die according to Netanjahoo).

    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  48. ld says:

    I hope he develops a new phone and bypasses these NGO creeps and their toadies.

    Jews are trying to own the world and everyone on it

    • Replies: @H. L. M
  49. Johan says:

    we need a wealth tax

    Normally wealth tax is demagogic jargon, targeted to get electoral gain among a public of envious proletarian voters. Now it is oligarchy trying to disempower private enterprise. Although it has to be said that Musk initially gained his wealth through government policies and contracts, his business is not really an example of successful independent private enterprise. What they are actually saying: we made you rich, if you do not play by our rules, we are going to make you poor again.

  50. katesisco says:

    “Free speech” baffles me. You can drown in ‘free speech.’ The flood of media discounts ‘free speech.’
    “Kinship” care is now the social worker and Family Court standard, unbeknownst to the parents and relatives of teen preggers. Another ‘silent’ issue lost in ‘free speech.’
    The phrase ‘most of us live lives of silent desperation’ comes to mind.

  51. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:

    Quick point: Musk personally just banned Kanye West from Twitter. Musk wrote “I tried my best. Despite that, he again violated our rule against incitement to violence. Account will be suspended.” Kanye had posted a picture of a Swastika superimposed on the Star of David. Clearly, this picture was not an organized written out plan to carry out an illegal violent act. This proves that Musk will not implement free speech on Twitter. Personally, I don’t believe he actually has any ideological belief in free speech as something that serves the interests of Americans as a whole. Would someone who lives just for the sake of money actually value anything else besides personal resource acquisition? Musk is the world’s richest male, and to put that much effort into achieving such a status is a strong indication of possessing strong Genetic Sociopathology. However, I speculate it’s more than just this – I conjecture that Musk is facing extremely hostile threats from entities such as the ADL, the Deep State, FBI, CIA, and so forth. Surely Musk values his life too much to not agree to capitulate.


  52. @Kurt Knispel

    They all do (censor).

    Agreed. Pretending Musk is some sort of Super Hero is just silly.

    In fact, I just saw that Musk has suspended West from Twitter.

    On Thursday evening, Ye tweeted an image of a swastika embedded with a star of David, which was immediately removed by Twitter police. The tweet was swapped out with a message that read this post violated Twitter’s terms of service. A link to the social media platform’s policy page explained more about enforcement actions.

    West is is truly a loose cannon, and a bit of a fool, but equating the Nazi swastik with the Zionist star of David is a perfectly valid thing to do.

    Both groups are murderous scum, but the Nazis never had nearly as effective a propaganda arm as the Zionists. Nor did they have compromising photographs of every Western leader as do the swinish Zionists.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  53. “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” – U.S. Commanding General and First U.S. President George Washington.

  54. Satya says:

    Seyed Mohammad Marandi
    Nov 30
    They’ve banned Iranian, Russian, Syrian, Palestinian, Yemeni, Lebanese, and Iraqi media. Many critics have been removed from FB, Instagram, and Twitter. Others are shaddowbanned. That’s not enough for Josep Borrell’s European garden? Weren’t they the “Free World” or something?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  55. Agent76 says:

    November 23, 2022 Elon Musk runs monster poll — Should Twitter grant Mass Amnesty to all suspended accounts

    The affirmative is winning bigly. I would expect a Mass Amnesty announcement in the next few days. Great news for tens of thousands in CFP Nation, including Emerald Robinson, War Room and Tracy Beanz.

    Oct 30, 2022 Elon Musk wastes no time changing Twitter

    On his first day, Twitter’s new ‘Chief Twit’ quietly changed the homepage to send a message.

  56. Agent76 says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Thanks for your share, and here is even more insights.

    Jul 6, 2021 Elon Musk celebrates 100 years of Communism on Chinese social media | Gordon G. Chang

    Author and political commentator Gordon G. Chang joins Ezra Levant to discuss Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s decision to celebrate 100 years of Communism not just one Twitter, but on the Chinese social media app Weibo, where he changed his background to prominently feature an image honouring 100 years of the Communist Party of China.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  57. Agent76 says:

    Actually, this is when the document was eliminated.

    Nov 22, 2013 Thomas DiLorenzo – The Revolution Of 1913

    From the Tom Woods show (podcast on iTunes),Loyola economics professor Thomas DiLorenzo discusses three events from 1913 that greatly escalated the transmogrification of America from the founder’s vision (limited government) to its current state (unlimited government).

    • Thanks: CelestiaQuesta
  58. @Johan

    What they are actually saying: we made you rich, if you do not play by our rules, we are going to make you poor again.

    Most wealth tax proposals have been 1-2 % over a certain amount. Usually around 1 hundred million.

    So they can still remain ridiculously rich.

    But no worries, both Republicans and Democrats are against the idea. Warren proposed a wealth tax and was scolded by her fellow Democrats.

    Conservatives tell us it is a sin to tax the wealthy. Keeping the wealthy at obscene levels is more important to them than health care for White families.

    In fact conservatives have pushed for tax cuts for even billionaires while claiming there isn’t room in the budget to expand health care for the middle class.

  59. anon[345] • Disclaimer says:

    Well, I guess we just found out how much free speech Elon can tolerate. He just suspended Kanye again for retweeting a Swastika. Another “act of violence”. Just one sight of that symbol could kill 6 million Jews.

  60. Anon[265] • Disclaimer says:

    The heros of the right… Ye lasted about one week before Musk banned him.

    —“That is fine,” Musk replied. “This is not,” he wrote on the deleted Ye tweet. “Sorry, but you have gone too far. This is not love,” Musk wrote.—

    Musk is one of the stupidest most hypocritical people in the world. Brain implant most needed.

    Ye’s gonna end up with the message “POOR IMPULSE CONTROL” tattooed on his forehead.

    //Shielded behind a face mask, Ye appeared alongside the white supremacist Nick Fuentes on InfoWars in an episode posted online on Thursday.
    The rapper said: “I see good things about Hitler … Every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler.”
    Jones replied: “The Nazis were thugs.”
    “But they did good things too,” Ye said. “We gotta stop dissing the Nazis all the time.”
    “Oh my goodness … just because you don’t like one group doesn’t mean –” Jones said, clearly uncomfortable. Ye interrupted: “I love Jewish people. But I also love Nazis.”
    “I don’t think Hitler was a good guy,” Jones stated later. Ye replied: “There’s a lot of things that I love about Hitler. A lot of things.”//

    But this guy is dumber yet:

    //“I just want to make a few things clear: the Holocaust happened. Hitler was a demonic figure. And instead of giving it a platform, our political leaders should be calling out and rejecting antisemitism wherever it hides. Silence is complicity,” Biden tweeted.//

    Unz Rev is below all and just a bunch of brain cripples because you seriously track these rich shitheads as if they mean anything other than examples of mental rot.

    But, Ron Unz, like Hitler, does some great things and has something to offer! So done with all the hate on Unz.

  61. anastasia says:

    Musk has a “Twitter rule” that you may not “incite violence”. What does that m ean. Well, we have heard what it means. Kanye West (and I am no fan) published the Star of David interwined with the Nazi flag. Musk said that “incites violence”. Would the photo of a burning American flag incite Musk to take action, you wonder? I don’t wonder.

    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
  62. anastasia says:

    Well, at least we know that the best, most informative information will be censored.

  63. HT says:
    @John Johnson

    Most people don’t actually support free speech.

    Throughout most of our history, because we had a largely homogeneous culture and country, most people had a very similar idea for what free speech means. That America is gone, replaced by a multicultural, multirace America that is hopelessly divided. We will never have uniformity of basic beliefs again and instead everything will be in a constant state of flux. The stable white Christian culture of the past is gone. With Jew cultural Marxism running our information system, stability is a thing of the past and opinions are now determined by our Jew masters who dominate our important institutions.

    • Agree: Anonydogg
  64. SicSemper says:
    @Tallest Skil

    Could not agree more, unfortunately I have such people in my family…

  65. Their sons were agile in the digital sea

    Of their interconnected medium,

    And they used the last days of its freedom

    As pirates waging information war

    Against his agents in the anticulture.

    By monopoly he had maneuvered

    Greedily to own it, and as it proved

    A true threat he installed his acolytes

    And gave them power to snuff the rights

    Of Aryan citizens to freely speak.

    When a single mercenary freak

    Could with his finger consign to oblivion

    Free conversation that had been haven

    For the dissident sane, or identify

    The heretics for attack or to deny

    Their livelihoods, they dared to persevere,

    Finding in themselves something severe

    They had thought lost….

  66. @anastasia

    For the record that was an ancient swastika wrapped in a Star of David used by a peaceful celestial cult who believe an alien race created mankind.

    How that symbol is dangerous and can cause violence should be directed at those who interpret its meaning and may have mental issues and are they themselves violent and a danger to the public.


    Wednesday night I had the privilege of taking part in the prestigious Munk debates in Toronto, Ontario. Along with The War on the West author and reporter Douglas Murray, we took on New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg and New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell, arguing: “Be it resolved: Don’t trust mainstream media.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  68. @René Fries

    Very sad to see you echo the views of Alan ( “I kept my shorts on”) Dershowitz.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  69. @Agent76

    Dear me-a racist Sinophobe Jew and a compradore cultural and race traitor hate China. It only redounds to China’s good repute.

  70. @Satya

    There is a garden at Alnwick Garden in Northumberland, in the UK. THAT is the racist thug Borrell’s ‘garden’.

  71. @Johan

    Call it a ‘parasite tax’, then. Levy it at the same rate on the exploiters of the labour of others, financial speculators, the destroyers of the natural world, purveyors of deadly poisons like tobacco, dividend bludgers, and liver flukes and intestinal worms, alike.

  72. Anonymous[338] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Vague/weird update from the Taibbster:

    I think this timed to coincide with whatever stunt EM is doing today with the laptop of yore.

  73. H. L. M says:

    Elon Musk is a 100% globalist minion fraud.

    Anyone who places faith in him is an idiot.

    End of Story.

  74. Anonydogg says:

    Yep. I cannot agree more with the article

    America’s serious experiment with almost total censorship recently has already led to a disaster of epic proportions -namely the COVID response and vaxx debacles.

    If the establishment suceeds is squashing whatever free speech we have left in America, even more diasters or all kinds, war (including civil war) and collapse are in the cards, and it will be swift.

  75. Is Kanye a PAWN in a Bigger Game?

  76. @Rich

    They favor censorship because it is the least costly option for them. Just leverage key individuals and the system is maintained. You are in a situation where the only solution is a revolution, which entails violence. This is going to be fun to watch.

  77. @anon

    Karl Popper was right when he said unlimited freedom endangers that very freedom. 1st Amendment protects those who want to get rid of it, but not the other way round – if those who want to curtail the freedom of expression succeed, then the 1st Amendment supporters wont be protected.

    But the dilemma is, what would be the reasonable control on the freedom that would prevent it from damaging itself? There is no firm answer. And there cannot be.

    American WASP elite in its peak allowed people to criticize it. Result was that it was overthrown. But if it had stifled those criticisms also, it would have led to dissatisfaction and overthrow. Catch 22.

    But unrestrained freedom is better than restricted freedom, because at least you know you are not overthrown because of your repression.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  78. @Johan

    1. One cannot go richer beyond a point without cheating the government.

    2. Above that is another point, beyond which one cannot grow richer without colluding with the government.

  79. @24th Alabama

    “Stammtisch-Marxisten beispielsweise verwerfen oft die Argumente ihrer Gegner, nicht aufgrund rationaler Gründe, sondern einfach nur aufgrund der (…) Herkunft des betreffenden Wissenschaftlers // Regulars’ table Marxists (literal traduction; the prefix “Stammtisch-” generally is meant to disparage) for instance often reject the arguments of their adversaries, not on basis of rational reasons, but simply on basis of the (…) provenience of the concerned scientist”, Schlaglichter, Verlag Hans Schiler, Berlin 2008, p. 611, bold writing mine.

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
  80. @Zachary Smith

    equating the Nazi swastik with the Zionist star of David is a perfectly valid thing to do

    is it? anyway, you forget the Soviet hammer and sickle, and the Saudi sword

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  81. @Old Brown Fool

    because of your repression

    I understand “expression”

  82. KenH says:

    Free speech in America is on life support because we allowed Jews to have almost unfettered power and allowed tens of millions of third world immigrants, who come from places with no history of robust free speech rights, into America. For it was Indians and other third world types enthusiastically censoring the speech of legacy white Americans with the Indian CEO saying he does not respect the 1st amendment. Just like us indeed.

    The Jewish ADL has been leading the charge against free speech by bullying, intimidating and threatening companies like Amazon, Twitter and other large companies and social media companies into adopting “hate speech” rules.

    Only Andrew Torba’s GAB has resisted and pushed back so the ADL and their co-racialists in the media and allies in government heap scorn upon them daily and imply that it’s full of knotsies and white supremacists planning acts of violence against angelic non-whites.

    The ADL/Jewish version on free speech will have the 1st amendment being absolute for leftists, Jews and non-whites especially if they hate white people while whites who don’t hate themselves will only have limited free speech rights. The further a white person is to the right on the political spectrum the less and less free speech rights they will have.

    Either we have free speech or you don’t. There aren’t degrees of free speech. Musk said he would restore all accounts who were banned but who didn’t break any laws. He as not made good on that promise and while he’s done some good he has cucked to Apple and the ADL’s Greenblatt and is a bit of a fraud.

  83. @René Fries

    In many ways the German Nazis imitated Judaism. ‘Herrenvolk’ and ‘The Chosen People’. ‘Lebensraum’ and ‘Eretz Yisrael from the Nile to the Euphrates’. ‘Blut und Boden’ both. No hesitation in mass murder and racial cleansing. The great difference is that Nazism survived thirteen years, whereas Judaism has lasted 3500, and morphed into many forms, and the most pernicious, Zionazism, is almost exactly alike to German Nazism, the snake swallowing its tail and rolling on.

  84. @René Fries

    Your point is well taken but my intention was not disputation but ridicule, using the subject’s own words.Ridicule is of course, ipso facto ad hominem and not acceptable in rational discourse,but it can be amusing to all except the target.

    As to the existence of the Palestinians as “a nation” I believe that question has been decided by them,and it is disingenuous for the Israelis to say, “you don’t exist.”

    Despite all the nonsense about the Khazarian origins of the Jews,most DNA studies have shown that European Jews have substantial common ancestry with the Palestinians and Europeans.

  85. Exile: “White civilization existed without “free speech” for millennia.”

    Certainly true. Recall that in ancient Athens, Socrates was executed for saying things that irritated his fellow citizens. It was an early lesson that civilization is the enemy of free speech, not its guarantor. As it has developed, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that the more civilization you have, the less freedom there will be in any domain of life. The system trends inevitably to totalitarianism.

    Aristotle, in Politics, says that man is a political animal; that only gods and wild beasts are self-sufficient enough not to need to be a part of human society.

    One may say anything one likes to the trees and the stars, but to other humans? Not infrequently, they’ll kill you.

    • Replies: @gaedhal
    , @24th Alabama
  86. gaedhal says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Christopher Hitchens wasn’t the best Historian, however in God is Not Great (2007) he mentions that the trial of Socrates was the first European blasphemy trial that we know about. One of the things that Socrates got in trouble for was for saying that thunder and lightning were not caused by Zeus, but by friction in the clouds. He was charged with being an atheist. Socrates did indeed rob the likes of Zeus of his thunder, but he was probably a deist. In Alcibaides we learn that Socrates could have very easily escaped his death sentence, however, because Socrates was a weirdo, in my Opinion, he chose to stay in Athens and drink the hemlock. Do you not worry that if the technological system were to disappear that religion would come back? Very often atheist spokesman say that the only way back for Religion in the West is the type of technological catastrophe that you hope for. It is the Internet that is finishing off the Rabbi-Jesus cult.

  87. gaedhal: “In Alcibaides we learn that Socrates could have very easily escaped his death sentence, however, because Socrates was a weirdo, in my Opinion, he chose to stay in Athens and drink the hemlock.”

    The two Alcibaides dialogues feature a Socrates not yet imprisoned. I think probably you mean the dialogue Crito, named after a wealthy friend of his who offers to finance his escape. We can only speculate as to his reasons for declining the offer, unless we accept at face value the reasons he gives in this dialogue for making his decision.

    This short dialogue is an excellent example of what we could say is a kind of proto-Christian worldview, complete with ideas of monotheism, an afterlife, loving one’s enemies, returning good for evil, contempt for one’s mortal existence, etc. It’s clear Christianity owes quite a debt to Plato. It’s essentially a rephrasing of Platonism; a popularization with a few additions.

    On the other hand, since I deny the existence of universals such as justice, good, and evil, I don’t find Socrates particularly persuasive here. My view would be more along these lines: that Plato’s manner of thinking demonstrates that the group mind of the ancient world was already, in Socrates’ time, preparing to invent Christianity some four centuries later. As a technique, it was undergoing manufacture.

    gaedhal: “Do you not worry that if the technological system were to disappear that religion would come back?”

    I don’t concern myself with that. It’s not something I can control.

  88. Mac_ [AKA "Cris M."] says:

    The subject of ability to speak is the most important there is. Without ability of private thought, and speaking, communicating with others, no ability to defend our life, much less future or earth, our ability.

    The notion of civilization has become a problem in that people have become feminized, when first necessity in life is to make effort against threats, which applies to everyone. People do none of this, none of it, and so the wipe out and force schemes against private thought or speaking continue, and coming to a time it won’t be a choice. Though article focus is somewhat on web communicating, most important is local, The web isn’t ours it is ‘theirs’, those connected to schemes. Already half gone on things that mattered, also smart phones not private, what’s better focus is paper such as postal notes.

    There has been many predatory actions going on a long time against our ability to speak, including in supposed ‘courts’ to wipe out ability to speak and ability to prove actual record. The online stuff is sort of a warning, though subject is direct and effects everyone, where we live.

    The subject of speaking is more critical than people recognize. Appreciate the article Gregory.

  89. The caravan has moved on, yet the AU USUK (Oh You Suck) dogs still bark.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  90. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Intolerance of free speech has no particular political allegiance.Opposition to the Vietnam War caused many to lose jobs and friends,including conservatives who opposed the War on military grounds.Being right does not buy groceries or pay the rent.An ego wounded by being called a “traitor” and “commie” does not heal easily.

    In the current political milieu opposition to illegal immigration will earn you a “racist” label and lose you friends,and if you oppose American involvement in the Ukraine you are a “Russian lackey,”or worse.Be grateful that drinking the hemlock is passe’.

  91. Anonymous[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @René Fries

    victims of the so-called “Naqba”

    Like the 6 gorillion victims of the so-called LOLocaust? The grift that keeps on grifting guilt-gelt from goyim?

    No ones jails attendees at conferences set up to investigate the existence of Bigfoot.

    Smallhats do imprison anyone questioning their golden calf Shoah biz con. Why? Why fear the investigation of “settled science”?

    SGT STOLEN VALOR: “You need to keep giving me millions of dollars annually for my alleged PTSD caused by my purple-heart combat actions.”

    VETERANS ADMINISTRATION CLERK: “Let’s meet to discuss your service record.”

    SGT STOLEN VALOR: “You can’t examine my record because that would only make my PTSD worse. Just gibs me muh monies!”


    How many millions of shekels has Isranose paid in reparations to Palestinians? How many Naqba museums has it built around the world? How many kids in classrooms learn about the Naqba and Jew emulations of Adolf, Inc.?

    Also, how many Never Forget! Matzonians emulate 1933-42 Germany by “othering” Arabs?

    the descendants of the 850.000 Jews ejected from the Arab countries are not even spoken of?

    Let them speak up for themselves.

    If they don’t, maybe it’s because they moved to Israel…the so-called Jewish “homeland” built on stolen Palestinian land…living on Easy Street courtesy of Uncle Sucker.

    “Palestinians”…are the descendants of Arab immigrants

    And Israelis are descendants of Ashkenazi Jew immigrants.

    Your point, aside from the one under your yarmulke?

    Your stance on the “climate” scam

    You mean your obsession with ever-changing…weather!

    Do you honestly think humans who litter, continue to buy water in plastic bottles, and fill huge dumps with other useless flotsam can (1) influence Mr. Sky more than erupting volcanos; and (2) discipline themselves to “save the Earth” when they can’t stop stuffing their pie-holes with junk food?

    What next: patenting your EMM (Eternal Motion Machine), PGI (Phlogiston-Generating iPhone), and CGC (Cardiff Giant Cloner)?

    Go back to practicing shlomotion onanism with $100 bills, Mammonite (aka R. Fries-with-that?)

  92. @Gary Sudder

    I prefer USUKA ie ‘you sucker’, the patsy being Austfailia, about to hand over hundreds of billions in Imperial Tribute to US and UK arms merchants, and get nothing but national self-destruction in return.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement