The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGregory Hood Archive
Flags of Opposition: Why the American Flag Isn’t Enough
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Symbols represent concepts, values, and ideologies that are felt more than expressed. You either understand a symbol or you don’t.

One key American symbol is the national anthem. Black singer Whitney Houston probably performed the most famous rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner” in history. At Super Bowl XXV in 1991, a patriotic crowd cheered and roared, especially when military jets flew overhead to end the performance. That unity is gone. Today, “The Star-Spangled Banner” is racist according to the California NAACP, vandals in Baltimore, and a very large group of journalists. The NBA and NFL sometimes play the black national anthem, “Lift Every Voice And Sing,” before games.

The most important symbol for many people is their national flag. A flag is a bit of cloth, but men kill and die for it. People say burning their flag is “desecration,” just as Roman Catholics are sickened to imagine the Communion Host defiled. A national flag is the symbol of a people. It’s the one thing everyone should feel belongs to them.

It’s also what changes when there is “State Conquest,” when a new ruling class — or a new people altogether — takes power. South Africa today limits the use of its historic flag. Rhodesia became Rhodesia/Zimbabwe and then Zimbabwe, with new flags at each stage. A Republican state legislature in Mississippi preemptively surrendered in the culture war by voting to replace the state flag because of the Confederate battle flag in the canton. The battle flag was once so common that the Southern Poverty Law Center founder Morris Dees could say it was part of his heritage. In 2015, Governor Nikki Haley (née Nimrata Randhawa) removed it from the South Carolina statehouse. She will almost certainly be a contender for the GOP nomination in 2024.

Credit Image: © Erik S. Lesser / ZUMAPRESS.com
Credit Image: © Erik S. Lesser / ZUMAPRESS.com

The American flag no longer unites us. Many who hold American passports do not consider themselves “American.” People burn the American flag so often it’s not even news. Often, those who burn it are blacks or Hispanics, the people who get special benefits from the government. Many people vent hatred for the United States on the Fourth of July.

President Trump wants to make it illegal to burn the flag, but that would violate the First Amendment. It’s illegal to steal someone else’s American flag and burn it, though that would be a minor crime. By contrast, when a Hispanic man burned the rainbow “gay pride” flag, a judge sentenced him to 16 years in prison for a “hate crime.” When someone burned a rainbow flag in Kansas in 2019, NBC News gave it national coverage and authorities investigated it “as a hate crime.”

Whom does the American flag represent today? Conservatives are generally more patriotic than liberals and whites more than non-whites. However, the American flag doesn’t belong exclusively to whites. If America is an idea, it belongs to everyone. Even the “idea” is up for grabs. What “ideas” do Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Ilhan Omar share with Washington or Jefferson?

If we say the American flag represents the government, it is the banner of a system that is replacing its own population. Some government employees evidently don’t think the American flag sufficiently represents them, even in an official capacity. The American embassy in South Korea displayed the rainbow flag and the Black Lives Matter logo; CNN called it a challenge to the Trump Administration.

September 21, 2020,: George Floyd Protests in Portland, Oregon. (Credit Image: © HÖÖK Pontus/TT via ZUMA Press)
September 21, 2020,: George Floyd Protests in Portland, Oregon. (Credit Image: © HÖÖK Pontus/TT via ZUMA Press)

Immigration patriots know that people marching for amnesty for illegal aliens often wave the national flags of their “real” countries. When Hispanics protested Proposition 187, which withheld state benefits for illegals in California, some marched under the Mexican flag or even held signs that read “Mexicans against 187.” (This proves the state needed Proposition 187.)

In 2006, countless aliens waved the flags of their homelands in large pro-amnesty marches. In 2011, Hispanic students in Texas waved Mexican flags when they walked out of public schools to protest immigration law enforcement. In 2015, an American public high school tried to stop an American student from flying an American flag on his pickup truck. The school backed down, but it was a remarkable example of a state institution banning its “own” symbol.

Many people think the American flag is controversial. Psychology Today said it “can be seen as representative of white (and male) power.” In July, Virginia state officials told a contractor to take down an American flag at a construction site because protesters might “target” it. In Hawaii, where there is a strong secessionist movement, residents protested an Independence Day display of American flags. There are countless similar stories.

This is a problem for whites. Leftists can fly the American flag if they like, but they can also claim it’s “offensive” or “racist.” Ultimately, it represents a government that doesn’t defend white interests. Is there a flag that symbolizes white identity? The white sun cross may be the best known “white nationalist” flag, but is on the fringe and is too foreign for most Americans.

The first “American” flag, the Betsy Ross flag, is an implicitly white flag. Colin Kaepernick, whom Nike supports, forced his sponsor to recall shoes that displayed the flag. It is certainly part of our heritage, but it cannot be our flag if we are trying to imagine a new future for our people. We cannot return to the Old Republic. Still, it has potential, though it has the same problem as the first national Confederate flag (“the Stars and Bars”): It looks too much like the current American flag.

The better known “Confederate flag” was the battle flag of Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. This is a historic flag for white Southerners, and is also a larger symbol of rebellion. Today, it represents white working-class resistance against America’s cultural elite. This has potential for us because it has outlived its past, but it’s ultimately a symbol that looks back, rather than ahead. Some black Southerners also claim it, which can lead to amusing showdowns.

One interesting flag is the combined Confederate battle flag/American flag. After Reconstruction, Union and Confederate veterans hosted joint commemorations. Today, some historians and journalists say reconciliation was a trick to cover up the Confederacy’s “defining cause” of slavery. However, it was really a way of binding up the nation’s wounds. Abraham Lincoln understood this, which is why he praised the Confederate national anthem “Dixie” when he went to Richmond in 1865. White Southerners flew the “Rebel Flag” in World War II and in Vietnam, seeing no contradiction in honoring the South and fighting for Uncle Sam. The combined Union/Confederate flag is aesthetically questionable but ideologically consistent. It’s a symbol of the historic American nation, the white core that built and sustains the Republic.

However, revisionist historians have a point: Post-Reconstruction unity between North and South was possible because the North “gave up” on forcing black rule on the South. This changed when President Eisenhower used the 101st Airborne to integrate Little Rock schools and Presidents Kennedy and Johnson used federal power to enforce “civil rights” legislation. Some Southern leaders flirted with secession again, but the opportunity passed. Thanks to mass immigration, Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, and other states may be under permanent leftist rule — just like once-conservative Virginia, Colorado, and California.

Eric Foner and other influential academics argue that Reconstruction’s problem was that it wasn’t harsh enough. This is the new orthodoxy in universities. It’s also hard not to see this view as a trial balloon for what many want to unleash against Donald Trump supporters. Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich has already said we “need” South African style “Truth & Reconciliation Committees.” In this context, the battle flag may take on new meaning.

The Gadsden flag has larger mainstream appeal, and the historic yellow banner became the symbol of the Tea Party movement. Unfortunately, the Beltway Right co-opted it, and the Tea Party failed to stop government spending or even Obamacare. The black variant has more a militant look that I like, but it’s too vague a symbol of defiance, like the various “Come and Take Itflags.

Defiance can spark creativity, and new flags are appearing in response to Black Lives Matter. The most famous is the “Blue Lives Matter” flag, with a black and white Stars and Stripes and the thin blue line that separates civilization from chaos. President Trump’s campaign used it at rallies. The Marshall Project said “white supremacists” flew it at Charlottesville in 2017, but they also flew the American flag.

There are variations with a red line (for firefighters) and others for various “first responders.” The problem is that these flags represent state officials, who may be secretly “on our side” but who follow orders. If police are told to arrest gun owners or dissidents, most will. It was just after protesters at Unite the Right 2017 chanted “blue lives matter” that state troopers gassed them and drove them into the ranks of antifa. Still, the flag shows resistance to BLMania.

The Trump 2020 flag, in its several variations, captures something beyond support for a candidate. Some say “Make America Great Again.” Others say, “Keep America Great,” though these have become less common during the campaign. A common one reads “No More Bullshit.” Each person who flies it has his own opinion about what that means, but it would be hard to argue that it doesn’t represent a yearning for a strong executive to suppress mobs, reject political correctness, and control the permanent bureaucracy (the “Deep State”).

October 7, 2020, Milton, Pennsylvania, United States: Trump signs and flags adorn a shed in rural Northumberland County near Milton, Pennsylvania. (Credit Image: © Paul Weaver/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire)
October 7, 2020, Milton, Pennsylvania, United States: Trump signs and flags adorn a shed in rural Northumberland County near Milton, Pennsylvania. (Credit Image: © Paul Weaver/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire)

The aesthetic contrast between the Trump campaign and the Biden campaign reflects this. President Trump projects strength and leadership. Joe Biden wears a mask, takes a knee, and is the face of a system for which he would be a figurehead.

Unfortunately, the Trump flags leave whites in the same trap as the American flag. President Trump has accomplished great things against incredible odds, and I hope he wins, but he won’t save us. At best, he bought us a stay of execution. At worst, he energized the left without protecting us from it.

The MAGA movement may be implicitly white, but implicitly white movements haven’t solved the problems we face today. We are in a Race Against Time, to borrow one of Jared Taylor’s book titles, and time is almost out. We can’t afford more implicit movements, symbols, or ideologies when Texas or Georgia will be solid blue in a few years, regardless of what happens today. We can support police officers, but they may be forced to arrest us for exercising freedom of speech if progressives can find a way around the First Amendment. The Constitution won’t save us either.

We face a national, civilizational, and racial crisis. We need a movement that is explicitly white, that defends our interests as whites. We can no longer tolerate being treated as second-class citizens in the country we built. If we submit, we deserve everything that’s coming to us.

White identity may even save the United States of America by halting the complicated schemes to achieve an impossible racial “equity.” If America is to be a multiracial empire, our rulers should at least protect our borders, stop replacement migration, promote positive values, patriotism, and national pride. If instead, our rulers cheer on the descent into a “victimhood culture,” we whites will be the scapegoats. In that case, we need a place of our own — even if that means a separate country.

We need a banner around which to rally. What symbol captures our spirit of identity, unity, and will to survive? I don’t know. It is something yet to appear. Perhaps it will be the old battle flag, but I suspect something new will emerge.

Martin Heidegger famously said in 1966 that “only a god can save us,” but warned that we can’t “bring him forth by thinking.” Instead, we can “awaken a readiness to wait [for him].” In other words, it’s not a question of opening MS Paint and making a flag. Instead, it will come to us, a spirit and a symbol that will emerge from our struggle.

This is something we can’t force, any more than we forced Donald Trump to appear as an unwitting defender of white interests. We can’t just pick a symbol or a figure and go from there.

Leftists will keep tearing down implicitly white American symbols and institutions. In response, a historic flag could take on a new meaning. If the federal government imposes more policies hostile to us, whites may lose all affection for the American flag or any historic flag. The Stars and Stripes could go from being a sacred symbol for whites to a sign of hostile occupation.

Many Americans have switched flags. Countless Confederate officers who fought against the Union had once served under the Union flag. Robert E. Lee turned down the command of United States forces before deciding to fight for Virginia. A young George Washington fought with the British, killing Frenchmen in North America. An older George Washington fought with the French, killing Britons.

The remarkable grassroots enthusiasm for Mr. Trump, even in the face of repression and hatred, shows that whites want to fight for something. They don’t want America to die. They don’t want to give up on the dream. Even if America collapses, I suspect whatever follows will be the spiritual successor to the United States, rather than a complete break. It would like the Holy Roman Empire that emerged from the fall of the real Roman Empire.

Spiritual, cultural, and political movements don’t follow orders. We can’t choose the “right” flag or ideology and expect Americans to follow. Instead, we can participate in the struggle in every way we can, whether by writing, speaking, organizing, or donating. I have confidence — even faith — that if we do this, European-Americans will regain their self-respect. We will either save this country or raise a banner over something new. The countless flags of opposition — of all kinds — defying the political, cultural, and financial elites are proof that people yearn for something. When it finally emerges, it will seem obvious in retrospect.

1 Corinthians 13:12 reads: “For now we see though a glass, darkly, but then face to face: now I know in part, but then I shall know even as also I am known.” I don’t mean to blaspheme, but if a people is to survive, it must have a shared sense of fate, purpose and destiny. I see European-Americans searching for those things. I see them expressed, however imperfectly, in protest flags flying across this country. Something is coming, much bigger than Donald Trump.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. First, a historical quibble. The Holy Roman Empire followed the Western Roman Empire only in time. By contrast, the Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople, lasted almost another thousand years, from 476 until 1453. The Holy Roman Empire, which began with either Charlemagne in 800 or Otto the Great in 962, depending on the historian, had little in common geographically or culturally with the Western Roman Empire, which fell in 476 with the deposition of Romulus Augustus.

    If I had to pick a flag at this point, I would choose some variation of the English flag; a red Cross of St. George on a white field. The flag of the Duchy of Brittanny is similar, but the cross is black, rather than red. Maybe there was a crusader flag that could be used, but I think that the Cross of Jerusalem was adopted by the Ku Klux Klan, so that’s obviously a bad choice.

    It’ll happen, if it happens at all, more by accident than by design.

  2. A flag’s beauty is inherently sinister, because men can be manipulated so easily into believing that venerating a colorful rag is more important than safeguarding human freedom.

    Slave owner Francis Scott Key’s 1814 poem (originally entitled “The Defense of Fort M’Henry,” by the way) did not become the U.S. national anthem until 1935, in FDR’s barrage of jingoist propaganda building up to the second world war. As U.S. Attorney, Key in 1836 upheld the First Amendment by indicting a man for the “crime” of possessing antislavery pamphlets. Before being replaced by the Star-Spangled Banner, America’s national hymn was “My Country ‘Tis of Thee,” written in 1833 by a Massachusetts abolitionist, and famously quoted by Martin Luther King. It is long past time to retire Key’s unpleasant ode to militarism and racism and return to the better statement of American ideals.

  3. We can support police officers, but they may be forced to arrest us

    This one line tells me the author has no common sense. If the cops might arrest decent people, then it should be obvious that cops aren’t our friends. Cops are the first line of oppression and have always been so.

    The entire system is rigged to subjugate decent people for the benefit of the elite at the top and the human trash at the bottom. The hard working people in the middle have no representation.

    The best option for the average working guy and gal is to cancel the Federal Gov’t and allow states to become new countries. Those countries will represent 50 experiments on how to govern and people will vote with their feet to a place that suits them. The current system is one large open air prison with the US flag at the top.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Ralph B. Seymour
  4. sonofman says:

    If you even think that a “white” European-American identity is needed in the United States, then you don’t understand the concepts, values and ideologies that the flag represents. When the War of Independence was fought, there were no “whites”. They were diverse people, mostly of European descendants, united to militantly rebel for freedom and independence against authoritarianism, and fight for the inalienable rights that have been instilled in every human being since the beginning of civilization. Then (other than the North American natives and the distinction of Africans caused by the slave industry), and now, all tribes and factions are represented by the flag and are accommodated the rights and freedoms proclaimed in the Declaration and cemented in the Constitution. All the narcissism and demands for differentiating consideration (and using flag representation), only cause the division necessary for conquest and change. White identity has no place in America just as racism and socialism does not. Spiritually and culturally, America is cool. It is politicians that have betrayed the legacy of why and how America originated, and fail to represent the principles that are deserving of perpetuity.

  5. anonymous[374] • Disclaimer says:

    When you’re ready to exercise your right of self-determination; and you’ve learned which regions have the strongest bonds with yours; and you’ve limited your country’s extent to keep its peoples on top of any overreaching state; then you’ll be ready to look for a flag.

    What you will have done is define one of the successor states to the collapsing US kleptocracy. Then you’ll need the backing of the outside world to escape the US police state. To get the outside world on your side you’ll need to be conversant with the legal requisites of responsible sovereignty, the principle of continuity of obligations, and the judicial precedents for unilateral independence including Kosovo and Crimea. Then your flag will come to you.

    Welcome to the civilized world.

  6. anon[112] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    “The best option for the average working guy and gal is to cancel the Federal Gov’t and allow states to become new countries. Those countries will represent 50 experiments on how to govern and people will vote with their feet to a place that suits them. The current system is one large open air prison with the US flag at the top.”

    I agree with your intent but splitting the country into tiny countries won’t work at all. Just look at Europe. The corporations and NGOs would have an even easier time bullying these tiny countries.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  7. @anon

    With 50 concentrations of power instead of 1, you need 50 times the resources to corrupt these smaller entities.

    California, for example, will try to continue their free stuff economy by taxing their producers to fund their dirtbags. That won’t last long when there’s no Federal sugar daddy to bail their asses out. The producers will move to Texas, for example, where there’s no state income tax.

    With the Federal Reserve gone, there is no longer a US currency. They would have to either invent a new fiat currency or go back to something the world understands – gold and silver. Either way, they are on their own to fund what’s necessary because the world isn’t going to give them reserve currency consideration.

    Just the experiments on how to govern will produce winners and losers in a hurry because each state will be competing with each other state for residents and jobs. It’s the competition that will impose reality upon everyone. Those that won’t fight the reality will win and those that attempt more something from nothing will lose.

  8. Exile says: • Website

    Unless and until we form IRL communities that can project and protect sovereignty arguing over symbols or speculating on post-America is putting the cart before the horse.

    Start with a neighborhood, then a town, then a county and then a state that is de facto sovereign before you worry about making it official or further scaling up.

  9. anonymous[944] • Disclaimer says:

    Exile is exactly right. Fortunately, civil society is on it.

    The human rights cities movement helps citizens get the rights their government keeps out of their reach. The idea is to write the UDHR into local law (it’s already US state and federal common law, but judges are indoctrinated to blow it off.)

    https://pdhre.org/Human_Rights_Cities_Book.pdf

    https://humanrightscities.net/who-we-are/

    UDHR in local law gives you the first of the legal requisites of sovereignty. It gives your local government popular legitimacy – a society and government worth having. And it makes your town shit through a goose to the US kleptocracy.

    If you want any claim on regional self-determination, then this is what you do. This is the first thing you have to do if you hope to get recognized as an independent or successor state. If a local politician’s not aware of this stuff, he’s not qualified to run for dogcatcher.

  10. Gordo says:

    Most of the flag pics being blocked where I am.

    In this hypothetical don’t forget the importance of any new state having certain assets, what is the difference between the way Syria is treated and the way North Korea is treated?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
PastClassics
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.