The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsGregory Hood Archive
An American Son
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

This is part of our continuing series of accounts by readers of how they shed the illusions of liberalism and became race realists. First published in 2015 on Counter-Currents, this essay is the introduction to Gregory Hood’s book, Waking Up From the American Dream.

Tony: The morning of the day I got sick, I been thinking. It’s good to be in something from the ground floor. I came in too late for that, I know. But lately, I’m getting the feeling that I came in at the end. The best is over.

Dr. Melfi: Many Americans, I think, feel that way.

Tony: I think about my father. He never reached the heights like me. But in a lotta ways he had it better. He had his people. They had their standards. They had pride. Today, whadda we got?

The Sopranos, Episode 1, “Pilot”

I always felt cheated.

It wasn’t because I lacked for anything. I had an idyllic childhood. My childhood was so normal that in the new America, I’m a freak. Two parents (of differing sexes, a necessary clarification these days), a nice house in the suburbs, a stay-at-home mom, a hard-working father with a stable, nonpolitical job. A yard, a friendly dog, home-cooked meals, and a kitchen always bursting with food. A family that would get me through anything — if there were anything to get through.

There’s no trauma in my past. No abuse. No bullying at school. No diseases. No racial slurs around the dinner table. No terrible secrets or horrible injuries to overcome. Sensible center-left political views. No guns. No violence. Up until the time I stepped into a boxing ring well into adulthood, I had never been in a real fight in my life. After all, what was there to fight about?

Church on Sundays in the denomination of that relaxed American Christianity that holds everyone — Jew or Gentile — is going to heaven, except serial killers or Nazis. And while it was a majority white neighborhood, it was hardly segregated. Everyone hung out with everyone else. Why wouldn’t you?

Yet despite this background, I knew something was deeply wrong with the world I lived in. I eventually found my way into the most hated, marginalized, and repressed social movement in the world. I joined the ranks of a group of people who are universally portrayed by the media as violent, extreme, and crazy. And despite a lifetime of internalizing a certain narrative about history, morality, and politics preached from every organ of culture in the West, I now define myself by its exact opposite.

I am a White Nationalist. I’m writing this to convince you that you should be a White Nationalist — if you aren’t already. And more than that, I’m writing to tell you that there is almost nothing of this country that can be saved — or should be.

The great imperative of our time is for the white European population within the United States to secure its existence by creating a homeland independent of the present American system. All other platforms, programs, and issues are distractions or deceptions. All other political movements, creeds, and beliefs matter only insofar as they lead people towards or away our position.

I know this to be the truth. I know this mission to be the purpose of my time upon this Earth. I know no cause is more important.

And yet I can’t help but wonder: how the hell did I end up here?

What is My Country?

I’ve always loved my country—or at least the idea of it. But the United States of America isn’t mine anymore—and if you’re white, no matter how much you love it, work for it, or even bleed for it, it’s not yours either. And it’s not because of Barack Obama, or Bill Clinton, or even the so called Civil Rights Movement. It hasn’t been ours for a long, long time. Maybe it never really was.

Of course, there are plenty of Born on the Fourth of July-style coming of age stories where the protagonist rejects his patriotic upbringing to lose himself in a new identity built on “social justice” or faux cultural rebellion. This is hardly that. I reject nothing about the way I was raised — a stable family, a reliable income, and loving parents should be the norm. Nor do I react with some kind of exaggerated disgust towards the Philistine “’Merica” that is so easy to criticize. “There is a great deal of ruin in a nation,” and America is no different.

I could say that I’m simply defending the communities like those I came from — and the right of whites to live in them. I could say that — but it isn’t really true. The 1950s idealized by the stereotypical American conservative are gone — and they weren’t that great to begin with.

Another critic might say that I’m just one of those born revolutionaries who would dissent against any order at all. Today, the entire national and international power structure, political system, and moral code is built around suppressing white identity and European Identitarian politics. So I simply picked the most contrarian thing you could be — the equivalent of a Russian deciding in 1890 that he is a Communist. But that’s not it either.

I was never drawn to revolution. My politics don’t derive from suburban ennui. I was dragged to this position, and I fought it kicking and screaming every step of the way. When all is said and done, I want to win so I don’t have to do this anymore. I want a normal job and a normal life in a homeland for my people that won’t need professional revolutionaries, dissident writers, or the loathsome profession of “activism.”

The truth is something deeper, something that was always there, from the earliest point I can remember. American life can still be prosperous, orderly, and enjoyable, but there’s something deeply wrong and sick beneath the surface. It’s like a horror movie where the protagonist walks through an idyllic town. Everything seems perfect, but there’s something ominous you can’t put your finger on. There’s a nameless terror behind every smile or friendly wave. And as the film rolls on, it gets harder and harder to pretend it’s not there.

There is something deeply wrong with this country. It’s easy — even clichéd — to point to the symptoms. The skyrocketing rates of prescription drugs people take just to get through the day, the stabbings and shootings at elementary schools, the collapsing families, the barely veiled hostility between parents and children, the way Americans utterly drop out of their own lives, disappearing into a fantasy world of video games, entertainment, or celebrity junk culture. Despite a surface level of material prosperity undreamed of by most of human history, most Americans seem to be driven by a despairing, raging hysteria. They are at war with themselves and with everyone around them.

Just think for a moment how odd it is that we expect children to turn against their families when they become adults. That women idolize careerist celebrities with no clear accomplishments—but don’t want children. That men pursue perpetual adolescence. That our media celebrates people who can’t decide what sex — or even species — they are. That the smartest people in our society frantically promote an ideology that dredges up the worst within us — weakness, decadence, and an ironic condescension at past accomplishments.

That our entire society seems to be built upon deliberately destroying everything we inherited — and that the loudest voices telling us to pursue equality mysteriously accrue vast personal wealth from these efforts.

Was it always like this? Were people always so petty and weak? Were men always judged not by what they did, but whether they were “racist”?

What most people praised as the ideal, I found pathetic. And so I felt cheated. I felt something deeply important had been stolen from me — and I didn’t have the knowledge to say what it was.

I wasn’t a Radical Traditionalist when I was young. I didn’t know about the “Kali Yuga” or some grand theory of decline. I wasn’t into occult philosophy or alternative history — I was into baseball. I was just a normal American kid that felt like the great battles and heroes were all in the past — and somehow all that was left was this small world, of small people.

It started like this, a vague wonder if this was all there is. When on a field trip or a vacation I always felt an odd resentment for the people who climbed on statues or smiled for pictures in front of a memorial. The cold statues seemed more alive than the people. The tourists seemed an insult to a better past filled with better men.

The Bible speaks of a time when the angels of God mixed with the women of Earth, and “there were giants in the earth in those days . . . mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Where were they now? The heroes of the past seemed as foreign as the giants of myth. Far better to disappear into fantasy, leading empires on computer games or reading books about ancient heroes who did something more than complain about racism. Looking around at the white males who disappear into a world of fantasy every chance they get, I knew I wasn’t alone.

Even in school, I had the impression that the End of History had arrived, even if I didn’t know enough then to call it that. At a certain point, the story of America — and the story of humanity — stopped being about the warriors, the pioneers, and the creators. Instead, it became a story about the victims, the people who built nothing but now had a right to the things other people had made. Our morality demanded it. The nation and the world we lived in had been created, and now all that was left was to point out inequalities and distribute resources accordingly.

And so we were told the great hero wasn’t a warrior or a scholar — but a social justice activist. It wasn’t the creator or the conqueror — but the weakling who has special rights precisely because of his inferiority.

Nietzsche writes of the Last Man, the man who has discovered happiness, “and blinks.” The democratic age ends with “men without chests,” leading small lives pursuing petty pleasures, looking down upon the ideas of greatness, struggle, and accomplishment. But this isn’t what we have. There are many full of passionate intensity and willingness to sacrifice. But the ideal they sacrifice for is the destruction of ideals, the promotion of “equality,” the abolition of “racism” or “hierarchy.”

And I found it pathetic.

Like so many others, my awakening to what was at stake came during college. Needless to say, the classes were a joke, and the degree was largely a waste. It was an ideological training camp, albeit one experienced through the haze of all but continuous alcohol and drug intake. Like many liberal arts majors, I found class an afterthought — and even at a supposedly difficult college, it was a simple matter to fit in straight As in between bouts of degeneracy.

But academics wasn’t the point. That became clear from the moment I set foot on campus. There was nothing, literally nothing, which could not be deconstructed. Toilets were gender exclusive and therefore evil. Statues on campus had to be torn down or buildings renamed. During class, I saw one black student burst into a sudden fury because someone casually mentioned the cafeteria was serving “brownies.”

But I was stuck there. And so I let the school do its work. I opened everything to question. I saw the structural realities of power underneath every dialogue, every class, every student organization. I saw how the personal is political.

But more than that, I saw that they had it precisely backwards. They were the system. They were the structural inequality. Using what they taught me, I deconstructed the deconstructionists. I saw what a fighting politics could be: Left-wing techniques and social analysis mobilized to Right-wing ends. When a tenured professor whose only credential seems to be her gender or skin color is shrieking at you about “privilege,” it becomes abundantly clear that American higher education is just a very expensive exercise in ideological misdirection.

But why I identified with the Right was something deeper, something primal. I had no reactionary illusions about what my country was — Lies My Teacher Told Me or A People’s History of the United States were textbooks, part of the System’s curriculum. I didn’t come from a Right-wing background. But there was something sickening, something that would physically nauseate me, in the way that the campus Left deliberately promoted ugliness, spat upon everything the country had accomplished, and rejoiced at the destruction of the historic American nation.

The turning point came with one of those racially charged campus controversies that dominate American universities. Older Americans nostalgically donating to their alma maters don’t really seem to understand just how bad it has gotten. In this particular case, some campus conservatives had fallen afoul of the black students at the school, and seemingly the entire black population of the school came to confront them. After all, they had nothing else to do.

I had no involvement in the activism or the response. I was not politically active during college. I simply sat in the back and listened, unnoticed. The black students alternately raged and cried, threatened violence or lapsed into maudlin self-pity. The handful of white students instantly turned on each other, apologizing and changing their positions. They were terrified—and they were right to be, as they were confronted by a numerically superior and racially motivated mob that had the explicit backing of the school administration.

I walked home from that incident changed. The blunt expression of racial solidarity had shocked me to my core. I began to understand that not everyone is just a white person, some of them with deeper tans. They really aren’t like us — and absent a white majority, the cultural norms and institutions Americans take for granted simply will not exist.

The American Right has always had at its fringe those who connected the dots between the United States and the European-American population that ultimately created and sustains it. Ultimately, as a defensive measure, I awakened to my racial identity. I understood that everything I valued—and everything worth preserving in a declining world — was ultimately dependent on European-American population.

Conservatives like James Burnham long ago defined the slow retreat of Western Civilization, as do mainstream figures like Pat Buchanan and Mark Steyn. I immersed myself in the “counter-jihad” movement. I studied the Minutemen and the responses to mass illegal immigration in the American Southwest. And I placed my faith in the American conservative movement and the traditional tripartite platform of limited government, traditional values, and a strong national defense.

Unfortunately, it didn’t take long to see that American conservatism didn’t really do much on the issues that matter. On illegal immigration, many Republicans and conservative leaders seemed to actually favor the invasion. A so-called strong national defense was more interested in defending the borders of countries in the Middle East than defending our own.

But more than that — I had a slowly dawning awareness that conservatives, at a deep level, did not want to win. They did not want to engage on the issues that mattered. Indeed, they even lacked a real definition of victory. The conservative movement was, as Joe Sobran said, “a game, a way of making a living.”

Millions of American conservatives have come to this realization and organized to defend conservatism from itself in the form of various Patriot groups or the Tea Party movement. But I started to come to a different conclusion. I slowly began to understand that conservatism — and America — could not be saved from itself.

Even more than that, I began to appreciate, if only distantly, the contempt artists and intellectuals have for what is called bourgeois civilization. I think your average white American, just like your average American conservative, has decent values. But every instinct they have is defensive and conflict averse. They will sacrifice anything and surrender everything in order to have another moment of peace. They will march voluntarily into the camps — indeed, they seem indifferent that what was once their country has become an especially large combination of a gulag and an insane asylum.

Julius Evola wrote in Men Among the Ruins:

We must concede that, per se, an anti-bourgeois stance has a reason for existence. I do not mean bourgeois so much in the sense of an economic class, but rather its counterpart: there is an intellectual world, an art, custom, and general view of life that, having been shaped in the last century parallel to the revolution of the Third Estate, appear as empty, decadent, and corrupt. A resolute overcoming of all this is one of the conditions required to solve the present crisis of our civilization.

An American qua American is incapable of this. Even though the mass immigration and outsourcing has ensured that the American middle class is in desperate retreat, Americans still define themselves as a middle class country. More importantly, the American Right explicitly defines its purpose as the defense of bourgeois classical liberalism — the defense of “life, liberty, and property,” to use George Mason’s phrase. Even as the substance and population of the country changes, we continue to cling to abstractions like “the Constitution.”

What I was confronting was the problem of every modern conservative: how do you save institutions that are already corrupted? And eventually, I came to understand the truth: you don’t.

Why I Gave Up on the American State — & Rediscovered My People

It’s no small thing to give up on your country. It is part of you, as much a part of you as your hometown or the faith of your youth. But people move away from those things too.

I never lost faith in what this country accomplished. It is easy on the European New Right to sneer at America — the land that progressed straight to decadence, without an interval of civilization. But the fact remains that this country — and no other — landed on the moon. We conquered an entire continent through war and struggle, perhaps the greatest military achievement of the entire millennium. We built the industries that created the modern world — and continue to create the technology that will be used in the world to come. America is the greatest military power in the world, the greatest economic power in the world, and the greatest cultural influence in the world. And, most important of all, until very recently, Americans defined themselves as whites and their country as a white nation.

And there are elements of that historic American nation that will always resonate with European Americans. The conquest of the West. The last stand at the Alamo. The Marines storming Iwo Jima. Bunker Hill, Pickett’s Charge, the Lewis and Clark Expedition, the building of the Transcontinental Railroad — who dares say that America lacks the legends, history, and heroes of Europe? This land of ours was sanctified with the blood of European warriors since the coming of the Pilgrim Fathers.

Yet America’s fall was inevitable. If the past century has taught us anything, it is that ideas are eventually taken to their logical conclusion. And whatever the triumphs the European people have achieved on this continent, they were ultimately in the service of a Founding Creed boiled down to “All men are created equal.”

It doesn’t matter that Thomas Jefferson didn’t mean this in the literal sense. Nor is it a contradiction that America, for most of its history, has thought of herself as a white nation. America at its core can only be defined as one of two ways — as an extension of Europe on the continent of North America, or as a deliberate separation from the Old World. And while there is much to admire in the American Revolution and in the great achievements of the United States, at its core the American ideal is that “we have it in our power to begin the world anew.” And so we did — and destroyed ourselves.

“America” did not accomplish anything. Whites did. European Americans did. “American” accomplishments overwhelmingly belong to them — and them alone. But the white historic American nation and “America” are two different things. The latter is an ideological construct at its core, defined by natural rights, universal egalitarianism, and material aspirations.

Looking around the contemporary United States, who can doubt that America is evolving into simply the logical conclusion of its founding ideals? Like the Comedian in Watchmen, who is asked “What happened to the American Dream?,” we have to answer, “It came true. You’re looking at it.”

To be a European American with a future means to confront the lie that is the American ideal. All men are not created equal. Rights are a product of power, not the gift of a Deist “God” whose will is reinterpreted every other week. The upward development of the race is the purpose of the state, not accumulating money by systematically degrading it. And we have more in common with our racial kinsmen in England, Germany, the Netherlands, and the other nations of the Occident than we do our nonwhite “fellow Americans.” Our Republic is no longer a melting pot, but a trash can. America today is simply enforced mediocrity.

Another world is possible — but there is something standing in the way. That something is America. Her existence drafts the past accomplishments of European Americans in service of policies and powers that are destroying them. The “mystic chords of memory,” as Lincoln called them, are less the source of solidarity and sacrifice than a tool of emotional blackmail on whites who know that something is deeply wrong but are afraid to break with a sanctified past.

Waking up from the American Dream means recognizing that American ideals have been tried, tested, and found wanting. They have led us to a country where all that is best is systematically sacrificed in the service of what is worst. Americans sense it, but resist what is to be done. To continue to believe in the Dream is to remain in a troubled sleep.

But we are awake. We are not “Americans,” for how can one be a citizen of an abstraction? We are Europeans, whites who have conquered the North American wilderness and are prepared to claim our birthright of a nation where we are free to be ourselves. We know that this farce you call a country is a nightmare that just rolls on and on, and we want no part of it.

We are not willing to die to make the world safe for garbage food, garbage culture, and garbage people, but we are willing to work and if need be fight for organic society worthy of service and sacrifice. We want to offer what is best in the service of something even greater. We want a homeland — and we mean to have it.

That which was best about America is still ours. But we don’t need this failed experiment anymore. We can be something better. But that can’t happen if we just go back to sleep and pretend that when we wake up in the morning, everything will be ok.

It gives me no joy to write this. It will be difficult, and in the short term, it’s always easier to remain asleep. But as I look back over my own life’s journey, I realize that politics and history are not so much about society, but about ourselves. What kind of people are we?

Patrick Henry once asked, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” Are we willing to accept the living degradation that American life has become? And if we are, what does that say about us?

I’ve heard authors and politicians define the core of America as “optimism.” But as Spengler said, “Optimism is cowardice.” We need the courage to break with pleasant illusions. Our nation is of blood, not of paper. We need to wake up to our own dispossession, and the forces that made it possible. And we need to create a homeland in order to take back our own souls from a culture that has become a poison. To do less is to betray that which is best within us, we who created and can surpass that beautiful lie we called the United States of America.

Original Article

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 192 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Whole lotta me in this one. Excellent work, Hood. Really-really. Everyone knew it would fall when they let the women in. Instead of telling them to shut up, they were somehow given real power. And that as they say, is that. All provable and documented. For tyranny, you go to the women, give them power.

    • Replies: @Swollen Goat
    , @theMann
  2. JackOH says:

    Fine writing, Gregory.

    I’ve written a bit about my “moments of truth” or “decisive moments” here, so I won’t repeat them. I was meant to be a corporate flunky. (LOL). I couldn’t get the interview, but once.

    I woke up one day in my 40s to see who was getting the jobs, the dough, the goodies, the poon, and the “right of condescension”.

    You know that last item, right? Culture studies folks have a phrase for it that I can’t recall. That’s the “right” of some folks to talk “down” to you, regardless of their non-distinction or your merit. Fuck all, I thought. I can’t be that fucked up, and the people who’re getting the goodies can’t be that fucking groovy. Took me years to admit that the America I lived in had gone way wobbly.

    White nationalism, as I understand it, ain’t my cuppa. I also won’t waste time scolding anyone for heading that way.

  3. onebornfree says: • Website

    “We need to wake up to our own dispossession, and the forces that made it possible. And we need to create a homeland in order to take back our own souls from a culture that has become a poison.”

    And if the author believes that any of _that_ can be achieved via government, then he/she is “a cup and saucer shy of a full set” , as they say.

    This “just” in:

    Government doesn’t work” Harry Browne

    “Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure” Robert LeFevere

    “Everything government touches turns to crap” Ringo Starr

    “The kind of man who wants the government to adopt and enforce his ideas is always the kind of man whose ideas are idiotic” H.L.Mencken

    Book: “Why Government doesn’t work” by Harry Browne :https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Why_Government_Doesn%27t_Work

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Agree: chris
    • Troll: 40 Lashes Less One
  4. Alex70 says:

    I agree with everything except “greatest economic power in the world “. Take away the petrodollar scheme and money printing press and it’s a third world economy within a week

    • Agree: Robert Bruce
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  5. Currahee says:

    Exactly and Wow!

    • Agree: AnalogMan
  6. Currahee says:
    @onebornfree

    Typical libertarian coward and sloganeer.

    • Agree: Catdog
  7. Anon[423] • Disclaimer says:

    “The great imperative of our time is for the White European population within the United States to secure its existence by creating a Homeland independent of the present American system.”

    This extremely sad and cowardly quote is quite a clear clue that White America is ultimately done. I’ve seen so much of this cowardly defeatist talk on conservative threads over the last half decade that it makes me absolutely ashamed to be White and of European stock.

    How would the new White independent Homeland within the United States work out? This new White Homeland would mean that all the Third World provenanced dross in the US would also have their own Homeland.

    The White population of the US is about 221,760,000, which might be the number of citizens in the new White Homeland. I’d assume, though, that Snowflakes, Lefties and other intellectually challenged White morons would refuse to live in this new racist Homeland. At least initially, a majority of them would opt to live with the Negros, Mestizos and the Arabs/Muslims (NMAMs) in their new American Homeland.

    What on earth could go wrong with NMAMs and about 100 million intellectually challenged progressive Whites living in their own Homeland? And how would this affect the new White Homeland?

    Well, Arab/Muslims are genetically programmed to view the Negros as Untermensch. The high crime Negros won’t like this. The Arab/Muslims will also attempt convert the Mestizos and the intellectually challenged Whites to Islam and force them to live under Sharia law.

    It’s a ready-made recipe for continual conflict in the new NMAMs Homeland, which will have to have a long border with the new White Homeland. How will the government and citizens in the new White Homeland respond when large numbers of the intellectually challenged Whites, Mestizos, Arabs/Muslims and Negros leave the war ravaged NMAM’s Homeland and crash across their border begging for asylum?

    Will the White government accept the “repenting” intellectually challenged Whites but refuse to accept the Negros and the rest? Or will they close the borders to all asylum seekers? I’d recommend refusing the intellectually challenged Whites, because you actually cannot fix stupid.

    What would very quickly happen is that the NMAM’s Homeland would disintegrate, and break up into at least three separate countries. Then where would the 41 million Negros try to carve out a Homeland? Their high crime, apish mentality and arrogant self-importance gets them short shrift from the Muslims and a lot of Mestizos, so naturally they’ll rock up and attempt to create a Homeland alongside the White Homeland. Like they did when South Africa was run by the Boars, where every White city, town and village had hordes of able-to-do-nothing Negros pitched up around the perimeters committing crimes and begging for crumbs.

    What parts of the current USA will the new White Homeland encompass? Will Whites give Alaska to the Negros or Arabs? If the Negros or Arabs get it, how long until Russia has legitimate excuse to invade this criminal and failed area, so as to secure its eastern border? Not very long, I suspect.

    [MORE]

    Do the Arabs and Mestizos get states on the west coast to build their Homelands on? How long would it be until China had a legitimate excuse to invade these new Arab and Mestizo countries, in order to stamp out piracy that they may or may not be undertaking in the Pacific Ocean?

    If China and other Asian nations were trading across the Pacific with the new White Homeland in the eastern half of the current United States, then they’d have a right to secure shipping lanes from marauding Arabs, Africans and Mestizos who had independent countries bordering the Pacific.

    Without oil an Arab nation is nothing. If you remove the oil revenues from all Arab countries combined, their gross economic output equals that of a medium sized company like Nokia. They manufacture nothing, they can’t even reclaim viable parts of their deserts to grow crops there.

    Back in the day, when White Europeans settled North Africa, the entire region was irrigated and utilised to grow crops, fruit and vines. There were numerous man-made oases dotted along a well-built and maintained road network. When the dumb Arabs settled it, all this was allowed return to desert.

    The Mestizos gross domestic output comes largely from the production and sale of drugs, and the Negro’s from crime and charity.

    I assume the new White Homeland is going to secure its borders. Thus, the Mestizos, Negros and Arabs won’t have a fulfilling GNP because they won’t have wealthy White people to sell drugs to, or to commit crimes upon – of course, they’ll be able to rape and keep as sex slaves the intellectually challenged Whites that would not live in the racist White Homeland.

    The Mestizos, Negros and Arabs are too dumb and lazy to even produce food crops they could trade to the new White Homeland. Therefore, there will be constant warfare between the Arabs, Mestizos and Negros for the small drugs market they’ll have in their own economically depressed countries.

    How long will it be until Whites in their new Homeland gets lazy and wants cheap labour to do the minimal work? Or they crawl to the Negro and Arabs to quench their hunger for illegal drugs. Then the Negros and other trash will be imported, at first, perhaps, on temporary visas, and then permanently. And in a few years, with the new White Homeland again overrun with criminal dross, the brave stand-your-ground Whites will be back on conservative websites and comment threads telling how they need to create yet another new White Homeland.

    Yeah, if Whites keep running like this, maybe they’ll be able to colonise Mars someday – and build a White Homeland there, that is until the Negros show up, and then the Whites are on the run again. Where next? Pluto?

    Then there’s the current US/Mexican border which is 1,954 miles long. If the new White Homeland is situated in the eastern US, then its border will stretch from Canada to Mexico, which will be a distance of 2,251 miles as the crow flies. So, the current United States Whites cannot at the moment secure a border which is 1,954 miles long, but they will be able to secure the border of their new Homeland which will be 297 miles longer.

    Go figure!

    Trump promised to secure this border, but openly reneged on this vow. He has also recently advised Americans to take the poisonous SARS CoV-2 toxin. With friends like Trump, the US doesn’t need 41 million Negro and 45 million other criminal/enemies within its borders.

    And yet White America, if given half a chance, will put this blatant egotistical liar back in the White House in 2024.

    As far as creating a White Homeland within the current US: Please drop this childish idiocy. White Americans already have a Homeland: the 50 states of the United States are your Homeland.

    Americans need to become men and take back their Homeland. But do Americans have the guts to do that? I don’t believe you have. To do this you need to be prepared to send the 86,240,000 trash that live among you, and parasite off you, back to the areas they originated from.

    The 41 million Negros currently in the US need to be dispatched back to Africa, and the rest back to South America, India and the various Muslims countries they come from. I’d subtract from this number Chinese and Japanese Asians.

    But will the current emasculated White Americans do this? Not a chance. They don’t have the time because they are sitting at home ingesting drugs they bought from Negros, whilst fretting that they won’t get the cheap goodies they bought from China, which are sitting on thousands of ships just outside American ports waiting to be unloaded. Americans are buying some much cheap thrash from China, that the supply chains have broken down.

    Anyway, give up the fatuous and cowardly notions of creating a new Homeland within the current United States. Foreigners see this as White America’s propensity to run away like cowards. Just like you ran away and abandoned your cities when the hordes of criminal good-for-nothing Negros showed up.

    Did the Russians run away when the Nazis illegally crossed their borders? No. They went out like men and fought for their Homeland. They were not prepared to live on their knees like slaves, as modern White Americans are very obviously prepared to do.

    • LOL: niceland
    • Troll: Fr. John, 3g4me
  8. Zumbuddi says:
    @Anon

    The Two State solution.

    At least we can be assured Biden & Congress will endorse it.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  9. R.C. says:

    Well said sir. May I ask where and when you went to college? I attended UF from 78 – 85 and it wasn’t like that.
    R.C.

  10. @Anon

    Did the Russians run away when the Nazis illegally crossed their borders? No. They went out like men and fought for their Homeland. They were not prepared to live on their knees like slaves, as modern White Americans are very obviously prepared to do.

    Those Russians danced to the state’s tune. White Americans are doing the same. The comparison is rhetorical bombast only.

    That’s not disagreement with your criticism of homeland fantasists, but the finish is like running into a home for the lethargically insane, crowing how they need to grow some balls. They are out of the picture, just as you stated at the start. We’re a sine wave descending into the zero cross. Critical axis: time. The White population has been cowering for decades. Years ago I went around the US looking for even a small town with balls, from which to assemble allies. No, the (((TV))) got ’em all.

    One of the most misunderstood quotes of the Trumpist chest-beater ilk is TJ’s refreshing of the tree of liberty. A quick dig for context finds that he was saying that as a tyrant, not a patriot, but even TJ might’ve been surprised to understand that the quote really refers to time, not contemporary violent conflict.

  11. The only problem with a white nationalist country is that then you have to live with white nationalists. Or just whites. Do you actually know any whites? Do you find them to be friendly? Where did you find these soi-disant friendly whites? Because they must be secret Martians. Whites are for the most part pretty damn mean to each other in my experience, forget what they do to other people.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Alfa158
  12. Imagine you got your own all-white country. Suddenly you would notice that some whites don’t fit. You don’t like them, even though they are white. They don’t cooperate. You don’t want to cooperate with them. You find them just plain obnoxious and annoying and you have an ungovernable urge to classify them as black or something just to get them out of your sight.

    You will start having to test. Are you a good-white or a bad-white? is the only question. Then that won’t be good enough, because pretty soon you’ll be ostracizing more than 50% because more than 50% flunked because you can’t stand more than 50% of them. So you’ll have to let some of the ostracized back in. So then you need a new category, “bad-white we can stand because we need him for cannon fodder.” And so on . . .

    Do you know anything about real life?

    • Agree: Emslander
    • LOL: Chester
    • Troll: Fr. John
  13. Vinnie O says:

    Well, yeah, but you ignored the fact that to be White, ya GOTTA be Protestant. I went to a Catholic grade school, so I never really encountered “racist” White boys ’til I got to high school. Public high schools are of course FILLED with anti-Catholic Protestants. And they’re the majority, and they know that it’s THEIR school.

    I went to a Catholic college, but as soon as I went looking for a job, it was back to being, “You’re CATHOLIC?! NOBODY is still CATHOLIC.” And of course the Fundamentalist Protestants were the pushiest. So the group agrees we’ll say Grace before Lunch, and “Grace” of course means PROTESTANT Grace. They were SERIOUSLY offended when it was my turn and I said the Catholic version. I think we simply STOPPED saying Grace after that. And of course the Catholic version of the “Our Father” is also different.

    And Protestants get SERIOUSLY worked up about deviations from THEIR version of stuff.

    But, yeah. Up until Negroes had enough social clout to be NOTICED, “discrimination” was entirely a Protestant-Catholic thing. So we had our Boy Scout troops, and they had theirs. I think there was even a separate “lodge” of the Order of the Arrow for Catholics.

    So there was always this unspoken idea that any organization that was not EXPLICITLY Catholic was run by and for Fundamentalist Christians. I never dealt with enough Jews to hear the Jewish version of “NOT being Protestant in public”. I assume they learnt at a young age to simply smile a lot and keep their mouths shut.

    Oh, a reason to hate Germans was/is that THEY’RE Catholic. (Adolf was a Catholic and was known to sneak into church to attend Midnight Mass for Christmas.) The majority is of course some flavor of Protestant, typically Lutheran. When he turned 15 or so, Goering’s mom told him he had to finally decide whether he was a Catholic or not, and Hermann picked Lutheran.

    • Agree: Fr. John
    • Thanks: vox4non
  14. Dutch Boy says:

    The appropriate question for Mr. Hood is one asked by the late Sam Francis: “Are Jews white?” One of the most deplorable aspects of the bourgeois liberalism the Mr. Hood properly deplores is the liberation of Jews from the social shackles that once restrained their hostile and predatory activities against the societies they inhabited. Their white skins did not inhibit those activities and still don’t.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  15. @Currahee

    I agree. As I’ve written more times than I can remember, it’s not all about money. But that is why libertarians are irrelevant in the ideological struggle the U.S is now in.. When the situation gets critical, Libertarians. will Take the Money and Run. They are useless to any one but themselves. That’s just my view.

    • Agree: follyofwar
  16. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @obwandiyag

    The only problem with a white nationalist country is that then you have to live with white nationalists. Or just whites. Do you actually know any whites? Do you find them to be friendly? Where did you find these soi-disant friendly whites? Because they must be secret Martians. Whites are for the most part pretty damn mean to each other in my experience, forget what they do to other people.

    Agree. As a white person I find the idea of white nationalism extremely unappealing. White nationalism (or any racialist philosophy) is a poison which forms when a people— civilization— abandon traditional Christianity. I agree with EMJ on this.

    • Replies: @Chester
    , @WJ
  17. Ron Unz says:

    A rather moving and interesting account of the author’s ideological roots.

    I think political scientists have often argued that nationalism usually arises out of common resistance to attacks or oppression. For example, Napoleon’s repeated invasions and occupations of the various German states was probably a major factor behind the subsequent rise of strong German nationalism.

    Obviously the same may be true on the individual level, with the endless activist attacks and humiliations inflicted upon white students on some college campuses giving rise to White Nationalist sentiments, thereby demonstrating the enormously counter-productive impact of all these crazy PC policies and Wokeness.

    I got the impression that the author grew up on the East Coast and probably went to college there as well. Therefore, it doesn’t surprise me that all the groups that so enraged and offended him were black-activist types. I noticed that he didn’t even seem to say anything about Asians or Hispanics, who together probably outnumber blacks 2-to-1 nationwide, at least among the more youthful age cohorts.

    I live in California, where blacks are 6% of the population and Asians+Hispanics 55%, and I’ve never heard anything like this about the behavior of those latter groups. I strongly suspect that’s a big part of the reason that there seems to be almost zero White Nationalist sentiment in California, despite whites now having become a shrinking minority of the population over just the last generation or two. For those interested, here’s a long article of mine from a decade ago that provides some quantitative analysis of these issues:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/

    What I’m about to say may sound extremely odd, but I’ve long suspected that “White Nationalism” itself is almost a PC-type sublimation of other sentiments. When black-activists constantly denounce or harangue you, and you feel their group unfairly benefits from Affirmative Action, you naturally become increasingly hostile towards them. But the notion of being “anti-black” has become so deeply stigmatized under modern cultural indoctrination, that the individuals instead prefer to think of themselves as “pro-white.” Meanwhile, immigrant groups relatively free from media brainwashing are sometimes much more candid in their sentiments.

  18. Impressive article, well written and historically informed, while tracing one man’s path to the place where he now stands.

    By far the most important dimension of it is the assertion that “America” has failed and that the best work done by “Americans” in the past can only be redeemed by those who have given up on “America”. This is an important, and in my view, necessary perspective that needs to be honestly and thoroughly debated, not summarily accepted or rejected.

  19. This is a good essay, aside from a few quibbles.

    The worst thing White Americans can do is to despair. That’s EXACTLY what our enemies want.

    The contest is far from over, regardless of daily proclamations from the (((MSM))) and the Illegitimate “government” claiming otherwise.

    Resist. Speak up. Work. Pray.

  20. Chester says:
    @Anon

    “As a White person”

    Oh, so you’re a “fellow White person”. Oy vey! How convenient!

  21. @Zumbuddi

    Biden and Congress would never agree to a two-state solution. If all the Whites left to form their own country, there would be no one left to pay the taxes.

  22. Franz says:

    We need to wake up to our own dispossession, and the forces that made it possible. And we need to create a homeland in order to take back our own souls from a culture that has become a poison.

    Make it plural and its a go,

    As obwandiyag eloquently points out, nothing worse for white guys than other white guys. The nastiness they practice “among their own” makes their negrolotry understandable — which is just another way of repeating studies and polls that always show that Race Means Nothing To Most Whites. No kidding.

    Alex70 makes an important point: American industry is well into its Potemkin phase. The country as a whole cannot put out enough basic steel to meet our own needs. For this reason, we have to realize that a collapse like 1929 will be a stake-through-the-heart of our current “nation.” All through the 1930s we still had the installations, but the Reagan bust saw the plants themselves dynamited and written off for tax credit by the Masters of the Universe. Who were usually Our Brother Whites.

    That means unlike the crash of the 20th century there will be no bottom.

    It also means new homelands won’t be a new and difficult way. It’ll be the ONLY way.

    To survive we’ll have to get away from the hordes who’ve been taught to hate us. Whether they are from old slave stock or the newest arrivals, they have nothing but contempt for the race that founded the current government. As Sam Francis put it long ago, they won’t feel any loyalty to us or any kinship with us.

    Optimist/Pessimist don’t apply anymore. The smash up is coming. Knowing we will have both great opportunities should prepare us for the barbarians the current regime keeps letting in to replace us.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  23. Anon[867] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    But the notion of being “anti-black” has become so deeply stigmatized under modern cultural indoctrination, that the individuals instead prefer to think of themselves as “pro-white.”

    You are correct with that assessment.

    In Western European countries over at least the last 10 years diversity laws have made it obligatory for companies to have a certain percentage of Blacks on their workforces.

    In one particular Western European country in which I worked for a few years pre-Covid I had interactions with Black clerical workers. What I can say about them is that they were all incompetent, and some of them atrociously so.

    Worst than this, the most incompetent ones were unbelievably arrogant and narcissistic. Other White people who had to interact and work with Blacks also found them to be nauseously incapable, as well as finding them to have extraordinarily high levels of narcissism.

    What I found out later on was that managers that hired Blacks didn’t have any expectations in regards to the input they were going to make to their companies. They basically hired them for no other reason than it was illegal to not have a certain percentage of them in the workforce.

    A lot of Black clerical workers simply showed up at the office and spent the day playing on social media – the companies were glad to have them do this, as it meant they were not making a mess of some job or other, or obstructing or hindering the other workers.

    Shops, supermarkets, nightclubs and bars in Western Europe, particularly Britain, will almost always have Black door-men and security staff. High levels of low-intelligence narcissism and authority over the entrance to a business premises don’t mix. What’s pertinent here is that a lot of the Blacks in Western Europe are straight-out-of-Africa and are full-blooded. I’ve found them to be much more unpleasant than the Negros I had gotten used to in the US.

    (I was liaising with an architect on a construction site at one stage. Whenever I went to meet this architect at the site I’d notice that there were always six Blacks with high vis jackets manning the main entrance. Most construction sites can make do with just one security person on the main entrance to control the entrance and exit of traffic. So, one evening while having a drink with the architect and some of his colleagues I enquired as to why there were six of them on the gate. The architect responded: “We had to hire six to comply with local diversity laws and putting the lot of them on the entrance is where we believe they’ll do the least damage.)

    In Western Europe I had my first experiences of interacting and working with Blacks in clerical settings, and I’m not exaggerating when I say: I still find it hard to believe how generally dumb they collectively proved to be. To say nothing of the high levels of narcissism I have experienced from some of them – there were definite signs of personality disorders in quite a few of the Blacks I encountered in Europe.

    Over the last few years advertising in Western Europe has taken a turn for the worst. In all types of advertising, Blacks predominate. The couples which are mostly shown in British advertising are Blacks with White girlfriends/wives and Mulatto children. Then there’s European TV shows and movies, even historical dramas set in the 16th century will have Blacks playing the lead roles – not only will they be out of place but they are generally disgustingly bad actors.

    The upshot of this is that over the last 5 years in Western Europe, Blacks have been suddenly thrown into people’s faces on a scale never before experienced – I think the same can be said for the US. I know from having spoken with Whites in Western Europe that they’ve had the same shock as I’ve had when they experienced for the first time how Blacks can be so dramatically dull, childish, incompetent and dangerously narcissistic, all of which can be rolled up into the one biological unit, and you never knew which one was going to burst forth and come at you.

    People generally ignore Blacks until they have these types of experiences with them. Then, perhaps like me, they do research on them. And they find that Blacks actually don’t have brain function on the same level as Whites or Asians. The Negro brain and cranium are actually biologically different. Negros have a much lower facility for abstract thought than do Whites – that’s if full-blooded Negros have any ability for it at all. They view kindness and civility in Whites as being a weakness, and in a lot of cases will try to take advantage of this perceived vulnerability.

    Another aspect of the endless rounds of attention Blacks have been getting over the last 5 years in Western Europe is that it has actually made them self-important and more in other people’s faces.

    I knew a moron once who won \$60,000 (it was a lot of money at the time) and he thought that this automatically propelled him upwards a few ranks in society. So, he started frequenting more upmarket social venues that hitherto he had stayed away from. It took the moron a short while to understand that no matter how much money he had, the people he was trying to ingratiate himself with were simply not going to entertain him.

    I believe that the massive amount of attention the Blacks have gotten over the last few years has led them to have notions along the lines of the above moron. They’ve been arrogant, incompetent and narcissistic all along but, like a psychopath learns to fake emotions, they mostly kept these traits hidden. But now due to the endless attention and molly-coddling they are receiving from all echelons of society, they’ve come to believe they can put their true traits on display, and that Whites have a duty to accept them in whatever guise they choose to present themselves as.

    Which is something I believe that is going to backfire on them big-time.

    Anyway, much like you’ve said, I’d bet that quite a lot of Whites out there can’t stand Blacks and would love to see the back of them. But with the propaganda machine being as efficient as it is, they shroud this “racism” behind a veneer of White nationalism.

    • Agree: Emslander
    • Thanks: JackOH
    • LOL: Sarah
  24. Baxter says:

    It might not happen tomorrow. It might not happen in ten years. There will come a day when the religion of anti-racism-and it is, in my opinion, a secular religion-will blow up in the face of white Americans. When that day comes they aren’t going to know what to do.
    Predicting doom for a society is an age-old and oddly pleasurable activity. It is certain the United States is on an unalterable course with demographic reality. I don’t know what will happen. The author says, “they really aren’t like us, and absent a white majority all the cultural norms and institutions we take for granted will simply disappear.”
    That is what has been happening over the past fifty years. It was slow at first, but now is noticeable and moving at an accelerated speed.
    I agree with the author. Separation is the only viable long-term solution. That separation of the races won’t come about until the majority of white Americans are knocked in the with racial reality. How that will actually come about is anyone’s guess.

  25. @Ron Unz

    What I’m about to say may sound extremely odd, but I’ve long suspected that “White Nationalism” itself is almost a PC-type sublimation of other sentiments. When black-activists constantly denounce or harangue you, and you feel their group unfairly benefits from Affirmative Action, you naturally become increasingly hostile towards them. But the notion of being “anti-black” has become so deeply stigmatized under modern cultural indoctrination, that the individuals instead prefer to think of themselves as “pro-white.

    Perceptive.

  26. Alfa158 says:
    @obwandiyag

    No we aren’t, we’re normally quite nice to each other.
    From your pseudonym I’m guessing you are Native American. White people treated your people pretty badly, so I can understand why you don’t like us, but part of the history of humanity is the story of people ill-treating Others, especially when those Others are in the way of something they want. It is also true that humans are usually friendly to others in their group whether that’s a family, tribe, nation, political party, race, whatever while being not as nice to people outside it. That’s how humans work. You can even use the old cope; “it’s nothing personal”.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  27. AReply says:

    Even with idyllic advantages by their own reckoning, fortunate sons like Greg Hood can’t escape being losers of their own making…

    The white nationalist secretly fetishizes oppression, wants to be a victim.

    Maybe Greg Hood quietly wants a giant black cock in his ass, but is despondent that he feels it’s shameful to go after what he wants, so he dreams of a world where there are no big black cocks.

    Or, maybe his upbringing wasn’t idyllic at all, but he is unable to face what’s messed up about the American plays-in-Peoria white-bread dream that had his father on a while-collar treadmill of a meaningless salary job heading for a banal retirement, and his mother on valium and vodka after a years of daytime TV, bleaching the whites, baking Betty Crocker cakes and fixing baloney sandwiches for little Gregory.

    If only Greg was truly oppressed, then life would be worth living.

    • Agree: Emslander
    • Replies: @George True
    , @Bro43rd
  28. The democrat party scum, (excuse me for repeating myself) is fabricating one lie after the other on all the glossy magazines, on newspapers, on TV, and in Hollywood, about Trump. They are really worried about him running again.. I’ve noticed Acosta has been given countless media exposure, now that he has come out from under his rock, to continue his revenge stories against Trump. They just can’t let it go. Trump claims he won. Trump claims he won, they keep bleating. Not bothered by Hillary still claiming she won against Trump……Oh, where will it all end….Perhaps Mr. Hood has a point, it won’t. Nothing will be fixed inside this system, which is only considered a democracy by dreamers and extreme optimists..But as Spengler said optimism is just another word for cowardice.

  29. Exile says:
    @onebornfree

    There is no alternative to government. You can have a good one or a bad one, but you will always have one.

    Libertarianism has been advanced for decades by Jews and corporate shills who want to rule with an invisible hand – private sector plutarchs like Wall Street/Blackrock, Silicon Valley, the heads of media etc…

    If you limit the government to the extent libertarians demand, you are just letting Jews, mega-corps and billionaires govern you.

    No one quoting Ringo Starr on politics deserves to be taken seriously.

  30. ‘There are many full of passionate intensity and willingness to sacrifice…’

    Well, not exactly. At least, Antifa activists tend to run off if people actually prepared to fight confront them.

  31. vox4non says:
    @obwandiyag

    If Europe is anything to go by, it is sadly true. Ideally, if one could see beyond their own tribe or country, Europe could be a united powerhouse. Who knows, with all the unpleasantness shown by the immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, it might push the indifferent to a realisation that open immigration and uncritical acceptance of others is not the acceptable state of affairs.

  32. ‘… the traditional tripartite platform of limited government, traditional values, and a strong national defense…’

    Note that until relatively recently we emphatically did not have ‘a strong national defense.’ In 1940, our army was the seventeenth largest in the world — behind Portugal.

    And yet somehow we got by. Aside from sinking the notion that it is ‘traditional’ for us to have a strong national defense, this also raises the question of what is the actual function of that fantastically bloated military establishment we currently have.

  33. ‘…Another world is possible — but there is something standing in the way. That something is America. Her existence drafts the past accomplishments of European Americans in service of policies and powers that are destroying them. The “mystic chords of memory,” as Lincoln called them, are less the source of solidarity and sacrifice than a tool of emotional blackmail on whites who know that something is deeply wrong but are afraid to break with a sanctified past…’

    Nitpicking aside, good piece. Americans need to have the courage to confront and defy the shibboleths that shackle them.

  34. …everything I valued—and everything worth preserving in a declining world — was ultimately dependent on European-American population.

    Everything I value depends on an Anglo-American population. My maternal ancestors quit the Continent in the nineteenth century, my paternal ones in the sixth. (Anno Domini, thank you.)

    America at [her] core can only be defined as one of two ways — as an extension of Europe on the continent of North America, or as a deliberate separation from the Old World.

    The UK just failed as an “extension of Europe”. How would the US do any better? The Channel is wider than the Atlantic.

    The upward development of the race is the purpose of the state…

    Only to a Continental authoritarian. The upward development of the race is the duty of the race. The state belongs in the background.

    My preferred solution was Swiss-style devolution, but last month the burghers of that land voted to recognize buggery as consummating a marriage, thereby consummating their own Calvin’s revolution. There are only a handful of Protestant countries left, tiny ones, and in most you could easily wet their lips and stick them to the Genevan’s four bare walls.

  35. All men are not created equal. Rights are a product of power, not the gift of a Deist “God” whose will is reinterpreted every other week

    okay, you conquered a whole continent, enslaved another, and nuked some more. great achievement! (in worldly terms, that is.) but, your unwillingness (or is it inability?) to put yourself in the Other’s shoes is astounding. how are you even able to look in the mirror without shame? is this why you deny the Almighty? (“if there is no God, everything is permitted.”) But your ancestors were believers and in their own way believed to be doing according to a higher will, pilgrims to a new world. They succeed, in worldly terms. and now America has become the envy of the world, where millions pray to go to, and ruler of the waves.

    people from time to time develop unnatural and irrational feelings of hate to the Other. it’s unfortunate and often leads to terrible outcomes. deal with it. that is why we were given the Law. to teach us to behave as worthy of being called human and not brute beasts. but when the teachers (priest/pastor) go to sleep, the thief comes and sows tares amongst the wheat. many thieves are busy working at colleges and on the media. now, they are targeting even elementary school children.

    without God, we are all doomed.

    [to the Esteemed Mr. Ron Unz: let’s be careful what we wish for, it might come true. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/ellen-feldman-nazi-germany ]

    • Disagree: Ukraine Tiger
  36. @onebornfree

    Lolberturdianism is a joke unto itself.
    Reminder: Bioshock is a horror story, and Rapture was a failure of atheism and goddless materialism.
    But lolbergs are too low IQ anyway.

    Back to Marianna Trench Wakanda with you.

  37. “We conquered an entire continent through war and struggle, perhaps the greatest military achievement of the entire millennium.”

    Not true. Yes, you could say a continent was conquered, part of it by war and struggle. But it was not a great military achievement, when you look at the balance of power and organization. The tribes were, after all, tribes, hunters and gatherers, small farmers, locally organized, hundreds of different languages. The colonists had Europe at its back and had guns, germs, steel etc. Stalingrad was a military achievement, if one can call mass murder an achievement. Or Chancellorsville.

    ” the building of the Transcontinental Railroad ” come on, who built it?

    This mindset in general is a result of a cowardly refusal to face the reality of the Council of Foreign Relations, avoiding the legacy of the Dulles brothers; it’s another dodge, distraction from the history of real power in the USA. Target the imperial hive, accept being a Republic rather than a home nest for globalist imperialists, otherwise you’re just serving, via distraction, the agenda. The Billionaire’s Union exists and they love stuff like that, they rub their hands with glee at stuff like this, this is their dream ideology for the slave class to imbibe and spout. It keeps the slaves, slaves, far into the future.

  38. Schuetze says:

    Any expat who has dealt with the nightmare of US double taxation and then tried to escape the clutches of the IRS through expatriation has long given up on the US.

    For those who are not in the know, it costs \$2400 to drop your citizenship. If you are a “covered” expat at the time of expatriation, the IRS deems you to have died and then extracts their death tax from your still living and breathing soul. But it doesn’t end there, because you are also then forced to file US taxes for an additional 10 years, even though you are no longer a citizen. This applies to people who have never set foot in the US since their accidental birth on “US soil”.

    The US is a slave state and its citizens are most definitely not “free”.

    • Thanks: Fred777
    • Replies: @Oikeamielinen
  39. America has been terraformed by the Jews since before the Civil War. Every social woe we now enjoy was designed and implemented by the Communist Jew:

    A blood hatred for this tribe is essential for the survival of America. You simply cannot trust them. You must treat them like they have treated us. You must see them as a parasitical race; all colluding and scheming in secret for the destruction of your race. They absolutely hate White Europeans. We are their greatest enemy. Great men from past generations tried to warn us of the tactics of the Jews. Why did we not listen?

    https://www.thinkoutsidethebeast.com/what-famous-people-throughout-history-said-about-jews/

    [MORE]

    Atheism
    Freud
    Dr. Spock
    Pornography Industry
    Free Sex
    Abortion Industry
    No-Fault Divorce Laws
    The destruction of the American Family
    2nd and 3rd Wave Feminism
    -The Scofield Bible Addendum – Jew funded Cyrus E. Scofield – Perverting Christianity – Jews used to be rightfully called “Christ Killers”. 50 years later, all of America is now called a “Judeo-Christian” nation. But no longer can we say Merry Christmas. No longer can the white house display a nativity scene.
    -Immigration Reform
    Open Borders
    Multiculturalism
    Big Pharma
    Bill Gates’ Trillion Dollar Covid-19 Plandemic
    AIPAC
    ADL
    Hate Speech Laws
    Anti-Semitism
    US Holocaust Museum (Some 400 Holocaust Museums in America).
    Holocaust Indoctrination is now required in Every US School.
    The corruption of US Politics – All of the House and Congress bowing to Israel.
    Anthony Pollard
    The theft of our Nuclear Weapons
    NEOCONS
    9/11 – The Jewish murder of 3000 Americans
    20 Years of the fraudulent “Global War on Terror”
    10 Billion US Tax Dollars per Year given to Israel
    30 Trillion in Debt
    The Patriot Act
    Google
    YouTube
    Amazon
    95% of your Media is owned by Zionist Jews
    Hate Speech Laws coming Soon
    Confiscation of all Fire Arms – Comming soon.
    Marxism – Bolshevism – Communism – Zionism
    USERY!! The Federal Reserve / Fractional Lending
    The IRS

    It is now too late for us. They have corrupted our once-great nation. They have turned every race against each other. They have enslaved us all with their usury. They have destroyed a once pure Christain nation. They have destroyed the nuclear family. Now they assault the very history of our great nation. They have corrupted our elites and our Government. We are now just a bunch of fucking cowards kneeling before Israel, taught to worship the Jew and their HoloHoax Religion.

    We now wait for the Jew to build their third temple, so we all can be rescued by Jesus.

  40. @Ron Unz

    I suppose this is like when some girl wants to break-up with her boyfriend and uses that standard sentence: “It’s not you, it’s me.” No moderately intelligent peson will believe its sincerity, of course, just as in the case of White Nationalism few among either their adherents or opposers actually believe it in this case. You are overgeneralizing it, though. Don’t you publish a blog named “Stuff Black People Don’t Like”?

  41. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, would it be worthwhile at all to have a writer straighforwardly catalogue the White responses to the challenges of Black Ascendancy (or Black Supremacism) the past 55-some years?

    I’m thinking, for example: (1) Flight to the suburbs, (2) Intermarriage, (3) White Nationalism, (4) Mimesis-adopting Black music, patterns of thought, taste, and behavior, (5) Legal “surrender” in law enforcement, i. e., non-enforcement, etc.

    Each topic to be followed by, say, a 300-500 word discussion.

    I’m thinking Nicholas Stix as writer, maybe Paul Kersey, I’m not sure.

    Some of these topics have been covered already on these pages under various titles and with various slants. I’m thinking that assembling those topics under a single title might have a good impact.

    Anything worthwhile to the idea?

  42. Biff says:
    @Ron Unz

    What I’m about to say may sound extremely odd, but I’ve long suspected that “White Nationalism” itself is almost a PC-type sublimation of other sentiments. When black-activists constantly denounce or harangue you, and you feel their group unfairly benefits from Affirmative Action, you naturally become increasingly hostile towards them. But the notion of being “anti-black” has become so deeply stigmatized under modern cultural indoctrination, that the individuals instead prefer to think of themselves as “pro-white.” Meanwhile, immigrant groups relatively free from media brainwashing are sometimes much more candid in their sentiments.

    So Gregory Hood should be more like Eric Clapton.

  43. gotmituns says:

    I don’t hate blacks or jews anyone else but I know they have to be removed from our midst with extreme prejudice.

  44. @Jim Christian

    Been saying the same thing for years. If you go back, all this insanity started with women gaining the right to vote.

  45. @Dutch Boy

    I think Jews, except for Ethiopian ones, are White, as are Arabs. Not all Whites are the same shade and physiognomy, and there are cultural differences. I don’t think that Arabs mixed much with blacks. Arabs used to castrate their slaves, unlike Americans who preferred to breed them (and some even with them) and save on the expense of bringing more from Africa, while Arabs being closer could easily import more slaves to castrate on reception. Also, Arabs preferred Whites for sex slavery so I don’t think they miscegenated much with the black female slaves, although who knows among the randy lower classes who would do it even with goats, donkeys and camels?

  46. theMann says:
    @Jim Christian

    Precisely what the Boksheviks did. To have a truly evil society, you need snitches, torture chambers, thought police, and systematic intolerance. And that needs the creatures who are never wrong, and never sorry.

    The 19th Amendment is not just a nation killer, but a Civilization destroyer.

    In the meantime. the putrid and self-evidently false idea of Racial Equality. And who is foolish enough to believe that lie, and advance it?

    • Replies: @DanFromCT
  47. Glorifying White achievements is only half of White Nationalism.

    The other half is blaming/naming the Jews.

  48. @Ron Unz

    Well, ya know, there’s almost zero white nationalism other places as well. While my opinions are almost congruent with hood’s, and I live in a southeastern red state, I’ve never ever met anyone who could be called a white nationalist or even begin to grok these topics. Most of the locals’ conservatism is rooted in the Bible and they would turn five shades of white if I handed them an Unz article or said anything critical of “you know who.” They are far more worried about abortion than immigration. White nationalism is a rare position anywhere. I bet that not more than a couple thousand people nationwide share hood’s positions and opinions.

    • Replies: @Eric Novak
  49. DrWatson says:
    @Ron Unz

    I never thought about this but quite possibly true. One can decide for themselves (if they want White Nationalism or a mostly blackless society) by contemplating coexistence with other races. E.g. I am not very keen on Mexicans. They often spat on the ground when seeing me, they were loud, primitive, hostile. Just a hideous bunch, in my experience.

    However, blacks may be a lot more dangerous and unpleasant to live around.

    I am also wondering if someone has data about the difference bw genomes of the Neanderthal and that of modern humans (excluding subsaharan blacks)? Is the difference comparable to the difference between whites and blacks? If it is then it is a legitimate question whether subsaharan black could be considered a different species? After all, Neanderthals are considered a diff spec, too, still modern humans were able to procreate with them.

    The bad news is that Neanderthals went extinct, after all. There was too much intermingling? At least their descendants’ looks definitely improved, which cannot be said of most Black&White admixtures.

  50. Will women vote in this White paradise “homeland” you want to create? If so, then you might as well not expend fruitless energy.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
    • Replies: @follyofwar
  51. You’re just a grumpy old man, mate. I’m by way of being one of those myself, so I’m perfectly well aware that times ain’t what they wuz. Not much we can do about it, I’m afraid.

  52. Fr. John says:
    @Vinnie O

    I agree with the post about being America being Protestant, but that doesn’t mean I agree with the poster that his ‘Catholi-Schism’ is the true faith, either!

    Both the Prots and the RC’s are in error, and have been for a thousand years. It’s called the Filioque, and the inversion of the ordo theologicae, fully laid at the feet of the Augustinians who followed Augustine. Read Farrell’s “God, History, and Dialectic” to understand it all.

    Neither cult (and yes, they are both cults) can claim ‘catholicity’ or ‘orthodoxy’ as they stand, today.
    So, why are you bitchin,’ as my dad used to say?

    America WAS BOTH White and Protestant- but not the heretical mish-mash it is, today.
    Honest Protestantism, that saw law as well as grace coming from God.
    Honest, that saw loving your neighbor as coming from a shared Ethnicity.
    Honest, in that it saw that nothing but a plot to rule the world, was what suffused the Papal mindset. And were disgusted by any ‘cat=lick’ who thought they could do the same to the USA.

    Then we got the same thing with the various foreign Missions Societies of the Prots. All of the anti-catholic reductionistic fools: BAPTISTS, METHODISTS, EVANGELICALS, ETC.
    They decided to ‘jump on the bandwagon’ and ‘conquer the world for Christ,’ never once stopping to think that Christ NEVER said the Chinaman, the Amerindian, NOR the Black were EVER to be the People of God. Just the Hellene (i.e., European) and the Judean (i.e., the fair, non-Ashkenazic) residents of Palestine, circa AD 70. NOT ONE OTHER.

    At least the Orthodox kept their religion and their race together, and separate. So, too did the non-Baptistic Prots (The Norwegian Lutheran Synod, the Swedish [Augustana] Lutheran Synod, the Danish Lutheran synod, the German LCMS, etc.) It’s only when the Prots started playing the ‘let’s ‘convert’ the pagan babies, that we went down the tubes.

    And you would have thought that the praxis of the former adherents of the Covenant (i.e, the Jews) now superseded by the Church, would have taught us something about all of this… but no.

    You want to have a ‘catholic’ America? We have it now- it’s called ‘Hispanic’ America. No, gracias, señor! I’d rather be an Orthodox minority Christian living in a self-aware Protestant White Ethnostate, than live in this multicultural, multiracial hellhole we now call, ‘America.’

    • Disagree: Emslander
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  53. Tucker says:
    @obwandiyag

    You must be subtly referring to Whites from New York or Whites from California.

    ” Suddenly you would notice that some whites don’t fit. You don’t like them, even though they are white. They don’t cooperate. You don’t want to cooperate with them. You find them just plain obnoxious and annoying and you have an ungovernable urge to classify them as black or something just to get them out of your sight”

    In my entire life, I have never met a single White man or woman who came from either one of those two places who did not turn out to be an obnoxious, narcissistic, egotistical, chest beating, selfish, pushy, hyper aggressive and thoroughly disagreeable waste of White skin.

    .

  54. TKK says:
    @obwandiyag

    The sub- culture of prison does not bear out your theory.

    Whites stick together in prison. However, there are some repellent critters that no one can stand. Take your pick: body odors, thieving, viewing children as sex objects.

    The force of the group disciplines them. They go underground with their behaviors or stop. Getting punched in the face by a grown man has huge deterrent value. More so, being expelled to live with the black sodomites has real time deterrent muscle.

    If they will not stop the behavior that disrupts the safety and well being of the group, they are banished.

    But, no guards are involved…the Government. No preference is given to the deviants.

    You see- America is run by the mentally ill now. We are ordered under threat of penury or prison to call a man a woman, to call a criminal thug a hero.

    Every society is going to have CLASSES. You are comparing apples to anvils. I don’t care for people who wear cheap cologne or talk about Jesus all the time, but in a normalized culture of the same race- the Government would not FORCE me to support the people, view them as sacred objects and allow them to kick me in the face.

    • Agree: Alexandros
  55. [Y]our average white American, just like your average American conservative, has decent values. But every instinct they have is defensive and conflict averse. They will sacrifice anything and surrender everything in order to have another moment of peace. They will march voluntarily into the camps

    If you take the Jew shitshot against the imaginary virus, you might as well march into a camp. If your blood is still pure, keep it that way at all costs. If you have already subjected, maybe you got lucky and got a placebo or maybe you’re resistant, but don’t let yourself be poisoned further. Whatever the case, it should be a matter of honor as well as one of self-preservation.

    If there was any doubt when they started the “vaccine” campaign that it was not a legitimate program, there should be no doubt now. Their crap doesn’t work in preventing any disease and it makes you sick. India—a very large case study indeed—had next to no “covid” until they started mass-vaccinating their people, then they suddenly got lots of “covid”. Of course, it wasn’t “covid” but the “vaccine” itself. Many of those injured by the “vaccine” were then successfully treated with Ivermectin, the very drug the cockroaches won’t stop mocking and railing against.

    It’s stupid and insane to believe the Biden regime and Bill Gates want you to take the “vaccine” because they are concerned about your health. They want you to do it because they don’t want you on their planet.

  56. Emslander says:

    But the fact remains that this country — and no other — landed on the moon. We conquered an entire continent through war and struggle, perhaps the greatest military achievement of the entire millennium . . . America is the greatest military power in the world, the greatest economic power in the world, and the greatest cultural influence in the world.

    Trouble is, that’s where we went wrong. American political hacks keep telling us these empty lies about our greatness when these are the worst aspects of our existence in this vast garden of abundance.

    • Agree: carroll price
  57. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Why vote at all? Voting is the Problem, not the Solution. Democracy sucks! Read the short book “The End of Democracy.”

  58. Emslander says:
    @obwandiyag

    I can’t believe I just agreed with obwandiyag on something.

    • LOL: TKK
  59. @Ron Unz

    Generally speaking, Whites can co-exist just fine with Asians and Hispanics. Yes there are cultural differences that can ruffle feathers sometimes, but everyone has the same basic agreement on how a society should function.

    The problems arise when you introduce significant numbers of blacks and Moslems. And of course, Jews to stir up animus.

  60. Emslander says:
    @Vinnie O

    Public high schools are of course FILLED with anti-Catholic Protestants. And they’re the majority, and they know that it’s THEIR school.

    Yes, those Protestant boys used to try that with us Catholic boys and then we just kicked the shit out of them. They became amazingly ecumenical after that.

  61. Anon[320] • Disclaimer says:

    Biden = Andropov

  62. @Exile

    Dude, mega-corps, jews, and billionaires DO govern us.

  63. DanFromCT says:
    @theMann

    Right, the Bolsheviks rely on all that, with the added point that these malefactors excuse themselves because they “had the best of intentions.” “Feelings . . . oh, oh, oh, oh, feelings . . . .” It’s also true, as Samuel Johnson pointed out, that the flip side of a woman or effeminate man’s cowardice is savage cruelty. Or, as for the Republican marshmallows in Congress, they have that caution cowards borrow from fear of the Jews and attribute to principle.

    “In our political environment, it would seem, we are surrounded on all sides with good intentions. But the nurturing of good intentions is an utterly undemanding mental exercise, while drafting plans to realize those worthy goals is another matter. Moreover, it is far from clear whether “good intentions plus stupidity” or “evil intentions plus intelligence” have wrought more harm in the world. People with good intentions usually have few qualms about pursuing their goals. As a result, incompetence that would otherwise have remained harmless often becomes dangerous, especially as incompetent people with good intentions rarely suffer the qualms of conscience that sometimes inhibit the doings of competent people with bad intentions. The conviction that our intentions are unquestionably good may sanctify the most questionable means.”

    Excerpt From “The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations,” by Dietrich Doerner that pretty well sums up the result of giving women the right to vote or hold positions of authority in our institutions. The irony is that women will pay the ultimate price.

    • Thanks: Jim Christian
  64. We conquered an entire continent through war and struggle, perhaps the greatest military achievement of the entire millennium.

    Not really. Wiping out indigenous tribes armed with bows and arrows could hardly be described as the greatest military achievement of an entire millennium.

    Makes you wonder if this might be where Americans and Jews acquired the habit of attacking defenseless people.

  65. I copied Mike’s post because it’s so good, and Mr. Hood somehow left all of this out:

    America has been terraformed by the Jews since before the Civil War. Every social woe we now enjoy was designed and implemented by the Communist Jew:

    A blood hatred for this tribe is essential for the survival of America. You simply cannot trust them. You must treat them like they have treated us. You must see them as a parasitical race; all colluding and scheming in secret for the destruction of your race. They absolutely hate White Europeans. We are their greatest enemy. Great men from past generations tried to warn us of the tactics of the Jews. Why did we not listen?

    https://www.thinkoutsidethebeast.com/what-famous-people-throughout-history-said-about-jews/

    [MORE]

    Atheism
    Freud
    Dr. Spock
    Pornography Industry
    Free Sex
    Abortion Industry
    No-Fault Divorce Laws
    The destruction of the American Family
    2nd and 3rd Wave Feminism
    -The Scofield Bible Addendum – Jew funded Cyrus E. Scofield – Perverting Christianity – Jews used to be rightfully called “Christ Killers”. 50 years later, all of America is now called a “Judeo-Christian” nation. But no longer can we say Merry Christmas. No longer can the white house display a nativity scene.
    -Immigration Reform
    Open Borders
    Multiculturalism
    Big Pharma
    Bill Gates’ Trillion Dollar Covid-19 Plandemic
    AIPAC
    ADL
    Hate Speech Laws
    Anti-Semitism
    US Holocaust Museum (Some 400 Holocaust Museums in America).
    Holocaust Indoctrination is now required in Every US School.
    The corruption of US Politics – All of the House and Congress bowing to Israel.
    Anthony Pollard
    The theft of our Nuclear Weapons
    NEOCONS
    9/11 – The Jewish murder of 3000 Americans
    20 Years of the fraudulent “Global War on Terror”
    10 Billion US Tax Dollars per Year given to Israel
    30 Trillion in Debt
    The Patriot Act
    Google
    YouTube
    Amazon
    95% of your Media is owned by Zionist Jews
    Hate Speech Laws coming Soon
    Confiscation of all Fire Arms – Comming soon.
    Marxism – Bolshevism – Communism – Zionism
    USERY!! The Federal Reserve / Fractional Lending
    The IRS
    It is now too late for us. They have corrupted our once-great nation. They have turned every race against each other. They have enslaved us all with their usury. They have destroyed a once pure Christain nation. They have destroyed the nuclear family. Now they assault the very history of our great nation. They have corrupted our elites and our Government. We are now just a bunch of fucking cowards kneeling before Israel, taught to worship the Jew and their HoloHoax Religion.

  66. @onebornfree

    How would you keep jews and jigaboos out of your territory without a government?

    Oh, I get it. You wouldn’t want to.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  67. WJ says:
    @Anon

    Would the ethnic state of Israel fall under your unappealing societies?

  68. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    I got the impression that the author grew up on the East Coast and probably went to college there as well. Therefore, it doesn’t surprise me that all the groups that so enraged and offended him were black-activist types. I noticed that he didn’t even seem to say anything about Asians or Hispanics, who together probably outnumber blacks 2-to-1 nationwide, at least among the more youthful age cohorts.

    When Israelis start accepting Asians and Hispanics into their country, we’ll do the same.

    I always believe one should lead by example. Don’t you agree?

  69. @Vinnie O

    Funny how this old antagonism just won’t go away.

    I see the issue in the opposite way. My experience tells me that it’s the Catholics that have the hard on for Protestants, and Catholics supporting the jews to push the anti-white agenda.

    It’s Catholics pushing for open borders and mass immigration, just like the jews.

    It’s Catholic shitheads accepting jewish liberalism and abortion.

    It’s Catholics on the Supreme Court voting to support every bit of degeneracy the jews can come up with.

    It’s Catholics voting left 85% of the time.

    TBH, I think Catholics have some of the same jealousy and spitefulness as the jews, hating the WASP just for the hell of it.

  70. anon[324] • Disclaimer says:

    Blacks create one thing, White Nationalists. If Whites do a little homework, they will dislike elite Jews even more. Blacks are the White mans burden but elite Jews are burden-enablers.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  71. It was an OK read until I got to this:

    “We built the industries that created the modern world — and continue to create the technology that will be used in the world to come. America is the greatest military power in the world, the greatest economic power in the world, and the greatest cultural influence in the world.”

    Exactly the problem with the world today, American Exceptionalism.

    The USA (not America, there are 33 other countries in America) has never had a culture of influence that compares with the great cultures of the past several millenia across most of the planet. You said it yourself:

    “the land that progressed straight to decadence, without an interval of civilization.”

    The USA is not the greatest economic power in the world and apart from being a showpiece, if confronted, the so called “greatest military power in the world” would shit itself before finding its navy on the seabed in hours.

    As for technology, you are completely deluded to think that the USA invents and creates everything the world needs. Most “achievements” were imported, stolen or bought from the rest of the known world and placed into the patent system that primarily resides in the USA. That doesn’t mean you created it, it means you control it.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Eric Novak
  72. anarchyst says:
    @Fr. John

    Your statement : /”America WAS BOTH White and Protestant- but not the heretical mish-mash it is, today.”/
    …leaves out a few important points.
    Protestantism has always been a “mish-mash” of beliefs, each sect adopting parts of the Bible while considering it to be the “unerring literal word of God” despite being rewritten and (mis)translated in order to promote a particular agenda depending on the times.

    [MORE]

    In fact, the King James version of the Bible was (re)written to create and mandate “the rights of kings” over their subjects, who were dutifully expected to obey the king’s dictates, no matter how self-serving and un-Christian.
    From Baptists concentrating on one passage of the Bible to fundamentalist snake handlers concentrating on another, it is clear that Protestantism IS a “mish-mash” of varying beliefs.
    Protestantism was created partially to correct the excesses of the Catholic Church, particularly the “sale” of indulgences–a supposed fast track to “salvation”. This, in itself was a worthy cause, but quickly went off the rails with each sect choosing and adopting its own particular beliefs.
    Another aspect of Protestantism that deserves to be explored is its affinity for judaism, which fails to recognize the undying hatred that judaism has for Christianity.
    Even the modern-day Catholic church has been poisoned by this heresy with the imposition of the changes wrought by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” which was largely a “coup” by Protestants and jews.
    Protestantism abandoned the belief that “good works” were necessary for salvation.
    It is difficult to comprehend how a person who has taken advantage of others all of his life, made life difficult for other, committing grievous sins and transgressions is able to ask for forgiveness on his deathbed and receive salvation “just like that”.
    Even if “good works” do not count, they can’t hurt.
    It is the Catholic Church that instituted the first hospitals and educational institutions, long before that of Protestants.
    Yes, the united States of America was largely successful due to Protestant (lack of) ethics, most builders of industry raking in millions in profits while ignoring the basic needs of those who made their success possible by their hard work. It was common to see these Protestant “captains of industry” do their damnedest to pay their employees as little as possible while raking in massive profits benefiting only themselves.
    These Protestant “captains of industry” attempted to redeem themselves by establishing “foundations” (which guarded their wealth, making it tax exempt) and indirectly countering their own Protestant belief that “good works” were not necessary for salvation.
    They always plead poverty to their employees while living grand lives themselves.
    This contributed to the rise of labor unions, which at first, were brutally suppressed.
    There were exceptions, such as Henry Ford, who almost single-handedly created the middle class by paying his employees well above “market wages” of the day. His \$5.00 per day wage was not entirely altruistic as it was also instituted to stem “turnover” as assembly line work was monotonous, but his writings have stated that one of his objectives was to make it possible for workers to “enjoy the fruits of their labor”.
    That being said…every belief system has its warts and foibles, Catholics included, but in the grand scheme of things, there is only one religion that can base its existence back to the apostles.

  73. Anon[353] • Disclaimer says:

    The first step to a White Christian Homeland is a “Compact of States”, followed by a Semi-Autonomous Republic (“SAR”), and then, only if necessary, the third and last step is Secession.

    https://www.compactofstates.com/

  74. “I want a normal job and a normal life in a homeland for my people that won’t need professional revolutionaries, dissident writers, or the loathsome profession of “activism.””

    And so long as the Jew isn’t secure (and he will never be secure) in the Greater Israel and Arabs won’t let it, you won’t be secure and the vicious cycle will continue to go on and on, forever.

  75. Agent76 says:

    Oct 11, 2021 I Left the Democratic Party After This (Pt. 1) | Michael Shellenberger | POLITICS | Rubin Report

    Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report talks to Michael Shellenberger about his new book “San Fransicko”, why he left the Democratic Party, how progressive cities made things much worse for the most vulnerable, the real reason that progressives defend petty theft, and why the modern day left has turned its back on the once embraced Viktor Frankl. In this clip Michael shares why he left the left and is no longer a Democrat.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  76. @Exile

    A few more for you:

    Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you. -Pericles (430 BC)
    No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. -Mark Twain (1866)
    Talk is cheap… except when Congress does it. -Unknown
    There is no distinctly Native American criminal class, save Congress. -Mark Twain
    What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. -Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
    A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. -Thomas Jefferson
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. -Mark Twain
    A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. -George Bernard Shaw
    A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow Man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. -G. Gordon Liddy
    Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavours to live at the expense of everybody else. -Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)
    I don’t make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
    If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free. -P.J. O’Rourke

    • Thanks: Agent76, chris
  77. Bro43rd says:
    @Currahee

    Typical trollish ad hominem comment that doesn’t provide any counter facts to OBFs comment.

  78. @Robert Dolan

    No, Robert. As someone who was Catholic from birth to age 49, and who knows a lot of Catholics, they are not hating on the WASP anymore in most of America from my vantage point. But many American Catholics have had a very week Catechism since Vatican 2. When these Catholics from the Northeast, Rust Belt, and West Coast went to college from the 1960s to the 1990s they just laid down for the liberal indoctrination. And, philosophically, American Catholics are all over the map. Their parents were in labor unions in the past, so they may still have that Democrat connection. But my lifelong Catholic dad, who died this year, hated what the Dems turned into.

    By the way, does anyone know why steinbergfeldwitzcohen stopped commenting? Or Chuck Orloski? Maybe they ran off with Fran?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  79. Rurik says:

    Another world is possible — but there is something standing in the way.

    of European Americans in service of policies and powers that are destroying them.

    We need the courage to break with pleasant illusions. Our nation is of blood, not of paper. We need to wake up to our own dispossession, and the forces that made it possible. And we need to create a homeland …

    why is it so often reading those with ‘white nationalist’, (or whatever you’d like to call it), sentiments, I imagine a Palestinian elder speaking to a gathering of youths in his refugee camp, saying something like’

    ‘We need to have a homeland. Things are not like they were when I was a young child in the early forties and life was so carefree and happy. My childhood house is right over there, and we used to play in that street, but no longer.

    No longer.’

    Now, we need a homeland we can call our own. “To do less is to betray that which is best within us..”

    At which point some young Palestinian might say, ‘but Kassam, what about the Jews?

    Whereupon Kassam will demand that the meeting is now over, and for all to read their Quran and pray.

    IOW the looming death of our civilization will continue unimpeded, as long as people are too cowed to even mention the enemy who’s busy murdering Western civilization.

    It isn’t blacks or browns or yellows who’re doing it. It’s white people in collaboration with Jewish supremacists that are doing it.

    Duh fucking Duh!

    The blacks and other POC are simply the ‘boots on the ground’ that are needed to enforce the occupation, once the war is won.

    And blacks would be nowhere without the critical mass of other people of color who vote for the same big-government = anti-White policies. Duh.

    [Just to put to rest the silly trope that browns and yellows are simply white people with a slightly different hue, unlike those ghastly blacks.

    – This may be true for Jews and liberalized (lobotomized) whites, but not in the real world].

  80. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    My Catholic friends are all crazy leftists.

    All of them.

    My Catholic college friend, now a professor at an elite college, actually read “The Culture of Critique” and seemed to understand it…..but still voted for Hillary and Biden. (This I do not understand)

    The current Pope gets his orders directly from the Sanhedrin.

    Pelosi, Biden, Ryan, Boehner, Roberts, Kavanaugh…….make horrible decisions, always siding with the jewish nation wreckers on every issue, especially on immigration.

    Ted Kennedy infamously sponsored the jewish Immigration Act of 1965.

    On the single issue of abortion, I have no idea how one can call themselves a Catholic/Christian and side with pro-choice, as most Catholics do.

    So, while you say that Catholics no longer hate WASPS, they always seem to side with the jewish nation wreckers on every single issue. It’s uncanny.

    In fact, though I have not made any lists, I bet if I were to make a list of the very worst shabbos goy sellouts…..I bet that 90% of them would turn out to be Catholics.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  81. “Our Republic is no longer a melting pot, but a trash can.”

    So true. But give it another 30+ years. We will not just be a mere trash can, but a big, stinking dumpster abounding with flies and maggots. People will look fondly back on the days when we were just a” trash can”

    Thankfully I won’t be around to see it, but I worry every day about my kids and grand kids.
    Some tell me not to worry about it… that there’s not a single thing I can do to improve the national situation. I actually get a little worked up, and using my hands for emphasis, I reply “BUT IT DIDN’T HAVE TO BE THIS WAY.”

    Indeed, tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.

  82. TKK says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Catholic Charities *will not stop* brining illegal 3rd world dregs of society into white suburbia.

    What other impulse could it be but to destroy white working class America?

    No one can give me the Christian compassion garbage to justify it. Let’s go up to Appalachia, WV and the Kentucky border and see real poverty. Outhouses. No heat.

    Furthermore , there is a trailer park about 10 miles from my house where the little kids stand out for the bus in 35 degree weather with no coats with snot running down their faces.

    We have to import the recipients of their Christian impulses? It is deranged and sadistic.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Jimmy le Blanc
  83. But more than that, I saw that they had it precisely backwards.

    I believe that a more precise term for what the author is describing is cognitive-dyslexia.

    Among the most dangerous words in the English language, for example, is the word sanction.

    As a noun, a sanction is a penalty meted out by a stronger party to punish a weaker party for some real or imagined bad-behaviour.

    As a verb, to sanction means to approve of, and encourage, some real or imagined good-behaviour.

    Next, where would such a distinction be most capable of causing misunderstanding with potentially catastrophic consequences? Answer: Diplomacy.

    Now, in practice, which group / area of human endeavour embraces and employs the word sanction more than any other? Answer: Diplomats and diplomacy.

    Ambiguous words – and especially deliberately ambiguous words – always gravitate to those in the business of making / obtaining money or power from appreciating and exploiting the ambiguity.

    Likewise virtually every material word in finance bears the same essential duality where a given word or term can mean either “X” or “minus-X” at the option of the decider (ultimately a judge / former-bank-lawyer) depending on the part-of-speech asserted and used to justify the answer.

    There is one commonality among virtually all material terms and conditions of any financial security, and that is that the answer to the question: What does this mean – X or minus-X? – is always “It can be either or both, and we’ll let you know if and when it becomes important.”

    The result is a total mess that ultimately manifests as a kind of slow-motion-cascade-failure that for most is beyond comprehension or belief: http://werex.org/praying-for-a-miracle/

  84. geokat62 says:
    @Automatic Slim

    Thankfully I won’t be around to see it, but I worry every day about my kids and grand kids… I actually get a little worked up…

    Knowing the fate of South Africa or worse is awaiting my children and grandchildren, I actually get more than a little worked up.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  85. anarchyst says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Not this Catholic…
    There are Catholics who subscribe to pre-Vatican II Catholicism and have never believed in the “judeo-Christian” claptrap that passes for Christianity today.
    Judaism and Christianity are diametrically opposed to each other. PERIOD!
    The sooner Christianity recognizes this, the better off everyone will be.
    It is long overdue to remove the “judeo-Christian” poison from our midst.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  86. KenH says:
    @Ron Unz

    What I’m about to say may sound extremely odd, but I’ve long suspected that “White Nationalism” itself is almost a PC-type sublimation of other sentiments.

    White nationalism arose in part as a reaction to black racial chauvinsim and hatred towards whites post 1965 and the vast racial differences that exist between the two. But if you consider George Lincoln Rockwell and William Pierce as the founding fathers of American white nationalism then it primarily arose to alert whites to Jewish power and influence that created the negro problem that still exists to this day. Thanks to the importation of more non-white racial groups via mass immigration (and Jewish power and influence) we now have a generalized race problem.

    A strong case can be made that civil rights, black pride and black nationalism are just euphemisms for disdain and hatred of white people and their society and a categorical rejection of detente with whites. I believe events since 1965 and the increasing demands and militancy of blacks have borne that out.

    Civil rights, black pride and black self determination and just lipstick and mascara on an anti-white pig.

  87. Rurik says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    Most “achievements” were imported, stolen or bought from the rest of the known world and placed into the patent system that primarily resides in the USA.

    Benjamin Franklin

    Wright brothers

    Henry Ford

    Thomas Edison

    Tesla

    and so many others, too many to count.

    (European) America once did great things. But that’s no reason for modern Americans to thump their chests as if they’re in any way ‘exceptional’, unless you consider them exceptionally pathetic for tossing their legacy on the ash heap of history in order to wallow in their racial self-abasement, taught to them by their Jewish masters.

    Catholic, protestant, European, Russian, North American and all the rest of the people of the dying West, must stop railing against each other, and zero in like a laser at our common enemy.

    We’re like the Muslims (or Ukrainians / Russians) too busy hating and slaughtering each other to notice the Zionist (Kolomoyskyi) laughing all the way to the bank.

    ‘It’s him! The protestant! He did it!

    No, it’s him! The Catholic!

    As they laugh their asses off all the way to the bank/Hollywood/academia/government and everywhere else of consequence.

    • Agree: James McLaren
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Ukraine Tiger
  88. anarchyst says:
    @Rurik

    One important point that most people miss is that all of these “giants of technology and innovation” had to come the the USA to create their achievements as in their “home countries” none of them were of the “elites” who ran their respective societies, and as such. they would have been prevented from achieving their dreams. If you were not “connected” socially, you were “out of the game”. The America of the day was “wide open”, those with ideas could easily propagate them here…
    Many European countries had (and still have) an informal “caste system” in place. If your grandfather or father was a shoemaker, YOU would also be a shoemaker and despite your abilities above and beyond, YOU would be consigned to that trade or profession and not be given opportunities for “upward mobility”.
    Upward mobility was not only discouraged, but due to political and social situations was generally not available to the lower strata of society.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  89. Memejon says:

    Every time America is substituted for USA, you encouraged the liberals and merged the national boundaries…for example the Haitians are from central America now, which is now part of the US.
    They need to pick the peaches and cherries, because you won’t.

    • Replies: @Resartus
  90. Mevashir says:

    I’ve heard authors and politicians define the core of America as “optimism.” But as Spengler said, “Optimism is cowardice.” We need the courage to break with pleasant illusions. Our nation is of blood, not of paper. We need to wake up to our own dispossession, and the forces that made it possible. And we need to create a homeland in order to take back our own souls from a culture that has become a poison. To do less is to betray that which is best within us, we who created and can surpass that beautiful lie we called the United States of America.

    Beautifully stated. But i fear it’s too late and we have been mindfcked via tv movies and now the ultimate instrument MKUltra-net. All this addiction to information paralyzes the will from acting. And that’s what the elites are counting on.

  91. Fred777 says:
    @Automatic Slim

    “Our Republic is no longer a melting pot, but a trash can.”

    You left out the “Salad Bowl” stage.

    • LOL: follyofwar
  92. Who has ruined you and your country? Who has made your country the most hated? Who facilitated the slave trade? Which mid east country has incited your country to attack it’s neighbors? Who has brought down your twin icons along with it tower 7? Why not a word against it and them?
    You deserve all you get.
    Fuck your white supremacy.
    You don’t even have the guts to name your enemy, your’e not a (unt as I love (unts but you are a cowardly a()hole.
    Have the courage to name and call out your enemy.

  93. Rurik says:
    @anarchyst

    The America of the day was “wide open”, those with ideas could easily propagate them here…

    I consider the Bill of Rights to be the apex of human evolution. The most divine-like thing man had done since the dawn of creation.

    And the Founders (like Paine, and Jefferson, and Franklin, and so many others) to be the very best of the best.

    They won with blood and determination, their freedom from Perfidious, (before she was even known as that).

    If only there were but a drop of the blood of these great men lingering in the veins of Americans today, perhaps there’d be some hope.

    What they *didn’t* do, is sit around talking about the inconvenience and indignity of having British troops quartered in their homes, or being forced to submit to an arrogant and unaccountable power, without ever mentioning the English crown or the Bank of England.

    The first step in freeing oneself from a tyrant, is recognizing (and saying!) who he is.

    Like the Emperor and his clothes, the first step is having the simple courage to speak the (obvious!) truth.

    That story is as true today as when it was written almost 200 years ago. Because so often, the most powerful act of courage in the face of tyranny, is the act of speaking the truth, when all others cringe in sniveling, obeisant silence.

    Say what you want about Trump (and most of it is likely true), but one of the things he did, was to call out the media as the enemy of the American people.

    For this, he was like that little boy in the crowd, speaking the simple and obvious, (but also explosive and thunderous) truth.

    • Agree: anarchyst, James McLaren
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @schnellandine
  94. Generally agree with you on everything.

    Yes, there are good Catholics. Mel Gibson is a favorite. EMJ too.

    But for some reason…..generally speaking…..Catholic leaders in every segment (govt., education, Supreme Court, media, etc.) are insanely liberal and anti-white.

    TBH, I don’t understand it. My Catholic friends are intelligent, decent, caring people.

    But for some unknown reason they all seem to have a severe case of jewbrain, and they are on board with all things globohomo. It doesn’t help that the Pope is a leftist lunatic.

    My Catholic friend from college actually heads the department at his school. He has to be rocking 130 IQ or better……and he seems to agree with me on the JQ…..but he still votes left. Oh, and he keeps telling me that the “Democrats are not anti-white.”

    I don’t talk politics with him anymore because it’s just too frustrating.

  95. On and on about different sects of Christardism. Here is the breakdown of the causes, in order of importance, of the dilemmas we face.

    1. Xtian ethics.
    2. Noses
    3. Women’s emancipation
    4. Melaninated peoples.

    Once Euros and their diaspora reached a certain level of comfort, xtian ethics of course dictated the embrace of the teeming mass of melanin. Some middle eastern man (whether or not he existed), espousing a communist revolution, was promoted by force onto pagan Europe and it was only a matter of time.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  96. RJJCDA says:

    Move to the “American Redoubt.” The inland northwest is beckoning. By the way, its climate is similar to northern and central Europe whence we originated.

  97. Miro23 says:
    @Ron Unz

    Obviously the same may be true on the individual level, with the endless activist attacks and humiliations inflicted upon white students on some college campuses giving rise to White Nationalist sentiments, thereby demonstrating the enormously counter-productive impact of all these crazy PC policies and Wokeness.

    Looking for historical similarities, there was Spain (1938) a year prior to Spanish Civil War.

    The ” the endless activist attacks and humiliations” were inflicted upon traditionalist Spain by Bolshevik inspired activists, while the leftist Republican government (voted into power in questionable elections) looked the other way and actually feared their own radicals. The media were solidly on the left and cheered on the violence and disruption.

    The enormously counter-productive impact of these crazy Bolshevik policies was to radicalize a previously moderate traditionalist/monarchist right , culminating in Franco’s military revolt and the Spanish Civil War. When the shooting started, Spanish society quickly polarized with defined Nationalist and Republican provinces and mobilization for general war.

    The issue seems to have been, that traditional Spanish society passed a point of no return. For its survival, it had to support the Franco revolution. The US doesn’t seem so different. The spark in the Spanish case was the leftist militia kidnap and murder of traditionalist political leader Calvo-Sotelo.

    • Thanks: chris
    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @Emslander
  98. Truth says:

    I am a White Nationalist. I’m writing this to convince you that you should be a White Nationalist…

    Alright, I’ll think about it.

    • LOL: Trinity
  99. It’s a well written article.

    I’ve got to say though, that in the last several days I’ve been informed:
    – by Ron, that this Covid horror show was a US bio warfare exercise. Could be true.
    – by Mike, that the vaccine will kill you. Probably true.
    – by Raches, that America is constructed of hate. Certainly evidence of that
    – by Greg, that America is in late stage terminal decline. No doubt about that.

    Point is, this is not a particularly happy site. I suggest Ron contract someone to write an uplifting column from time to time. Maybe a story about a puppy and a horse that walk 300 miles to reunite with their owner?

  100. @Automatic Slim

    It’s like black jesus says a ho mama is better than no mama and black jesus dont talk no jive.

    You really really really gotta try hard to find the uh hmmmm…positive in every situation, Sir.
    The most positive thing i see in 30 years for myself is not seeing 30 years from now. No tanks.

    Alllllll the young people i know are fully on board the crazy train.
    I figure intimations on trash can past will begin shortly. While it is still fresh in our memory holes.
    Shortly, Sir.

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
  101. If you begin a new nation founded on xtian ethics it logically follows that it will fall to pathos, in fact, there are passages all over the new testament filled with it. It has been that way since at least the antebellum period. The only reason Euros survived as long as they did was due to the transposition of the pagan identity onto the new universal religion.

  102. I liked this essay but why quote Evola? According to him, the entire world but the West in particular, suffers from the Vaishya disease and this began in the late Roman period. The middle ages was a reaction to the separation of the chakravartin from regality. The middle ages still had the link to other realms of existence. Venice changed all of that.

  103. @Robert Dolan

    TKK —
    AHA, but I saw you, TKK; don’t think nobody noticed when you sneaked out at night and dropped off a trunk-load of your family’s old coats at that trailer park bus stop.

    Some shoes, too.

    Why, you old softie you.

    —-

    It’s helpful to understand there are at least two major kinds of Catholics in USA, Roman Catholics and Irish Catholics.

    Roman Catholicism is really Constantinian Catholicism: Constantine set the rules for how this new group, “Christians,” should behave. It did this mostly in order to shore up Roman governance and sense of orderliness. “Catholics” took it and ran with it, especially those in the Roman Empire — predominantly Italians and maybe French. Italian Catholics are a LOT less hide-bound than Irish Catholics.

    Irish Catholicism is a whole ‘another story. (I’ve not studied this, I’m winging it AND observing how it plays out in my life in USA) Irish were converted by an Irishman who likely had an agenda similar to Constantine’s: to fortify a sense of Irish order.
    Irish Catholics dominate USA today; they have since at least the time of the world wars: lots of Irishmen fought in those wars, and sidled up to the people running the wars — notice how many Irish (and British Isles) names in Pentagon common positions?). Irish had been untermenschen before the wars; with the Glorious Defeat of Evil Germany, with the help of all those Fighting Irish, the Gratingest Generation, why, Irish made their bones; they Arrived.

    Italians, OTOH, were hated in USA from the time they started arriving in USA — at about same time as largest Jewish migrations — and their status certainly did not change based on Italy – Mussolini and all that. Jews hate/envy Italians almost as much as they envy Germans: American pop culture has made “mafia” a four (+ 1) letter word that is almost as stigmatizing as Swastika, and that summons ideas of “Italian.” What many people think of as Italian = Godfather and Corleone.

    It’s been my experience that Irish Catholics — women especially — are unbearable. Snippy, uppity, self-righteous, the poster children for SJW — think Samantha Power, the ultimate Irish woman.

    Best of my knowledge there’s always been tension between British and Roman Catholics/Italians: Roman Empire built much of what is worthwhile in England, and brought civilization to that “nation of shopkeepers.”
    But much as the Irish have a grudge against the British, the Irish want to BE British. Irish Catholicism in USA is closer to American Episcopalians (and at least since Cromwell and Rothschild, the Episcopal Church might as well be an Annex of Jewry-zionism: it was the OXFORD British press that was used to make people think the Hebrew bible was THE Divine World of God, the one unassailable history of the world, all centered on Jews) Samantha Power — the epitome of the SJW, self-hating white — than to Roman Catholics.

    (Of course, Francis and the Vatican are Zionist Occupied: neither Roman nor Irish. Zionist.)

  104. @No Tattoos

    I’d put the nose at number one, especially since they are the reason for massive third world immigration and the known destruction that follows it.

    • Replies: @No Tattoos
  105. Miro23 says:
    @Miro23

    Spain 1935 – 36 not 1938.

  106. anarchyst says:
    @Rurik

    Outstanding post! Thanks.
    That being said, the founders were brilliant beyond their means.
    For the first time in human history, our founding documents (the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the united States of America) imposed limits on what government was permitted to do while declaring that our rights were inherent in us by merely being human, and as such were inviolate and could not be abrogated.
    In every other country in the world, their “constitutions” are merely “permissions” from government, NOT “God-given rights” and can be abrogated, changed or denied at the whim of government officials.
    As time goes on, we have seen our “God-given rights” being marginalized by both amendments and government officials who cede their “authority” to unelected bureaucrats–not good.
    The “separation of powers” was a brilliant stroke of genius keeping each branch of government from overwhelming the others.
    Those of us who are aware still exercise our Constitutional rights regardless of government diktats. The sad part is that government indoctrination centers (public schools) have been at the forefront in espousing unconstitutional principles such as marxism, which has no place in U S society.
    President Trump is like a doctor who tells his patient to lose weight, minimize drinking and smoking and improve his health. At first the patient is angry, but soon realizes that the doctor is right…
    Regards,

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  107. @Robert Dolan

    There were many centuries when Aryans ruled their own nations and noses lived in their ghettos with their silly hats and violins, or in the case of Rome, they lived in Judea.

    What changed?

    Who let them out of the ghettos? (Napoleon, another universalist).

    It is something in the European that faltered. “Da Joos” were of no consequence for many, many years.

    So what happened?

    That is the question Whites should be asking themselves.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  108. geokat62 says:

    Gab’s response to an upcoming hit piece by the ADL:

    The ADL is an anti-Christ, Anti-American, and Anti-White hate organization. They should be registered as a foreign agent under Foreign Agents Registration Act for their operation in the United States on behalf of foreign interests in Israel.

    The ADL can try and pressure Twitter to censor us all they want, but they will never stop the signal of the 20 million people and growing who are using Gab’s services each and every month. Gab will never bend the knee to hateful extremist organizations like the ADL. 

    In the United States of America people have a right to speak freely, to religious liberty, and to bodily autonomy. Reminding people of their rights is not “misinformation.” If the ADL doesn’t like this perhaps they should move to Israel, which is one of the most vaccinated countries on earth and also a noted covid hot spot right now. 

    The January 6th Capitol Riot hoax has been widely debunked including by the FBI who “found “scant evidence that the Jan. 6 event at the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.”

    Jesus Christ is King and the ADL can go pound sand. 

    Andrew Torba
    CEO, Gab.com
    Only Jesus Saves

    https://news.gab.com/2021/10/11/gabs-response-to-the-adl/

    Could you imagine anyone affiliated with American Renaissance uttering the following words?

    “The ADL is an anti-Christ, Anti-American, and Anti-White hate organization.”

    • Agree: Miro23
  109. babu says:

    The original American dream was a Negro slave.

    • LOL: Deep Thought
  110. Emslander says:
    @Miro23

    The Center Catholic Party won the elections of 1934, despite Leftist rigging of the electoral system. The centrist President refused to name a Center Catholic to the Premiership even though his party had a plurality in the parliament. Instead, the Bolsheviks tried to stage a “Russian Revolution”. It was put down by the army. (Franco was Chief of Staff then).

    At that point, President Zamora, intimidated by the failing Bolsheviks, called for new elections, which were manhandled by the armed ex-revolutionaries. Communists won and the rest is (you know).

    Think Senator McConnell as Zamora and you get a clearer picture.

    Hitler said that the greatest cowards are the Center Right Bourgeoisie. (Republicans.)

    • Thanks: chris
    • Replies: @Miro23
  111. @Tony massey

    “Alllllll the young people i know are fully on board the crazy train.”

    One of my most horrifying thoughts is that some of these young White people, or their future progeny, will believe that they *deserve* to be murdered, raped, put into slavery, or otherwise abused by the melanin-rich savages. The White kids are essentially being taught to hate themselves and idolize peoples who haven’t achieved 1/100 of what our race has. It is really surreal. We are hated for our virtues.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
  112. Mevashir says:

    I am a White Nationalist. I’m writing this to convince you that you should be a White Nationalist — if you aren’t already. And more than that, I’m writing to tell you that there is almost nothing of this country that can be saved — or should be…. The great imperative of our time is for the white European population within the United States to secure its existence by creating a homeland independent of the present American system. All other platforms, programs, and issues are distractions or deceptions. All other political movements, creeds, and beliefs matter only insofar as they lead people towards or away our position…. I know this to be the truth. I know this mission to be the purpose of my time upon this Earth. I know no cause is more important.

    Edgar Steele suggested moving en masse to Russia. Unfortunately Putin already has offered Russian repatriation to European Jews of Russian ethnicity:
    https://www.rferl.org/a/putin-invitation-european-jews-reaction-mockery/27499866.html
    https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0306/S00186.htm
    http://www.bazbina.com/web1/site.php?idA=61

    Yet America’s fall was inevitable. If the past century has taught us anything, it is that ideas are eventually taken to their logical conclusion. And whatever the triumphs the European people have achieved on this continent, they were ultimately in the service of a Founding Creed boiled down to “All men are created equal.” …. It doesn’t matter that Thomas Jefferson didn’t mean this in the literal sense. Nor is it a contradiction that America, for most of its history, has thought of herself as a white nation. America at its core can only be defined as one of two ways — as an extension of Europe on the continent of North America, or as a deliberate separation from the Old World. And while there is much to admire in the American Revolution and in the great achievements of the United States, at its core the American ideal is that “we have it in our power to begin the world anew.” And so we did — and destroyed ourselves…. To be a European American with a future means to confront the lie that is the American ideal. All men are not created equal. Rights are a product of power, not the gift of a Deist “God” whose will is reinterpreted every other week. The upward development of the race is the purpose of the state, not accumulating money by systematically degrading it. And we have more in common with our racial kinsmen in England, Germany, the Netherlands, and the other nations of the Occident than we do our nonwhite “fellow Americans.” Our Republic is no longer a melting pot, but a trash can. America today is simply enforced mediocrity…. Another world is possible — but there is something standing in the way. That something is America. Her existence drafts the past accomplishments of European Americans in service of policies and powers that are destroying them. The “mystic chords of memory,” as Lincoln called them, are less the source of solidarity and sacrifice than a tool of emotional blackmail on whites who know that something is deeply wrong but are afraid to break with a sanctified past…. Waking up from the American Dream means recognizing that American ideals have been tried, tested, and found wanting. They have led us to a country where all that is best is systematically sacrificed in the service of what is worst. Americans sense it, but resist what is to be done. To continue to believe in the Dream is to remain in a troubled sleep.

    These are very powerful and provocative thoughts. I think the intention of ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL was a simple assertion that successful wealthy white colonists are equal in value to pampered and spoiled British aristocrats who suck off the public purse in London. That’s all. ALL MEN clearly meant White Men. It’s been reinterpreted at the convenience of the business class.

    America is run like a plantation, where the owner is respected and even venerated while the workers are regarded with disdain like nggr slaves devoid of inherent value or dignity. These same elites benefit from the influx of immigrants. But the slave workers are being displaced by hungrier more desperate folks who will work for peanuts under miserable conditions that native Americans will not accept and were never prepared to face.

    Another problem is America is a society of misfit immigrants from many lands. They are distrustful and paranoid. There is zero social solidarity here. Their only hope is to find a niche on one of the corporate plantations. There is no national culture or religion except worship of mammon.

    Ask a pastor or bible scholar what the justification for the American Revolution was, given the New Testament’s clear warnings (by both Peter and Paul) not to rebel against the king God has placed over us. These pastors will mumble some sort of pathetic excuse. We are at root a society of violent rebels and revolutionaries, and we are deeply hateful of each other and of God: https://www.amazon.com/God-against-Revolution-Loyalist-American/dp/0700630589

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  113. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, what I’m about to say may sound extremely odd, but I’ve long suspected that Zionist fifth columns are a PC-type sublimation of other sentiments. These Zionists are driven by fear and loathing of Moses, the founder of Judaism, and Jesus, his rightful heir, who had some hard and fast ideas about what Jews are supposed to do and not do, and enforced them at the point of a sword and the end of a whip. But the ((Jews)) have sublimated this, and lash out at Hitler, Christendom and the West, when in fact they want to lash out at their own totalitarian, money-worshiping, hypocritical, failed-Jew leaders, and ultimately, at themselves for being so sick and weak.

    This is where ((Jewish)) sadomasochism originates, which is just one of many psychological disorders and pathologies these ((Jews)) suffer from.

    End result: these ((Jews)) who are not Jews but anti-Moses and anti-Christ have infected much of the United States (and through it, the world) with their various mental diseases and moral and social pathologies via their accumulated Zionist network wealth, media power and governmental influence; the nation has become mentally ill as a result; and we are teetering on the brink of civil war.

    And it’s all because ((Jews)) remain stunted, repressed, delusional, and quite frankly, psychotic.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  114. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    Take this as you will from an outsider. My impression is that White Europeans are quite violent and full of their own enmities rivalries and hatreds. Note Hitler’s contempt for White Slavs for example. He respected Anglo-Saxons because of their Germanic heritage.

    I converted to Christianity after living as an Orthodox Jew in Israel for 20 years. I’ve experimented with every church denomination under the SON but currently do not attend any church. I am pretty much equally alienated from both Judaism and Christianity at this point.

    But my point is this: the only true hope for “White Civilization” is to be under either the Roman Empire or its replacement the Roman Catholic Church. That is the only organization that allows “Whites” to coexist free of mutual enmity and bloodshed. That is the true Transcultural Institution that Whites require in order to thrive.

    America was a rebellion against the White Civilization of Anglican Christian England. It opened the floodgates to ethnic and religious dilution. It welcomed Jews from the earliest times, both to finance the Revolution (Haym Salomon) and to import slaves for the Plantation class.

    I humbly submit to the readers here, after 20 years of wandering in the many denominations of Christendom, that a mass return to the Roman Church is really the only hope for whites. But even there you will have to reckon with the fact that the RCC is growing rapidly in the Third World, where people have simpler aspirations and find its spiritual promises and practices comforting. Whites have voted with their penises and stopped reproducing. That’s something they must ask themselves: why did they embrace the banal allure of American materialism and forsake family values and religion?

    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @Mevashir
  115. @Rurik

    I consider the Bill of Rights to be the apex of human evolution. The most divine-like thing man had done since the dawn of creation.

    The so-called BoR was a disaster, foretold at the time to end up exactly as it has. The only scrap of it worth a damn was the 10th amendment, which, not coincidentally, has been the most violated.

    No one has surpassed Lysander Spooner on that revered toilet paper known as the US Constitution. Published in 1870:

    But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain — that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.

    Upon the invention of the time machine, the first two missions should be to return to the 1780s and slaughter each Federalist, then go farther back and kill everyone involved in bringing negros ashore.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  116. @Alex70

    China has been the largest economy in PPP terms since 2014. Moreover the pure parasitism of the FIRE sector is vastly smaller in China than the USA. The USA is Colombia with nukes, vast bio-warfare resources and 1000 overseas military bases.

  117. @Schuetze

    Good point. Foreigners who clamour to reside in Amerika should study FATCA and associated schemes.
    The implications of becoming a “US person” are unknown to most — the last time I checked, 20 countries had signed on to FATCA so there is no escaping for citizens of those countries unless they find some other domicile.
    One does not need to be a US citizen to be a “US person.”

  118. @anarchyst

    The Founding Fathers neglected to consider the Fourth Power of government-money. Hence the USA has become a sham democracy, sham republic, sham society but very real oligarchy, run overwhelmingly by not just the rich, but one small section of the owners of the economy.

    • Agree: follyofwar
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Rurik
  119. @Anon

    Are you nuts? The Mexicans can’t produce anything but drug cartels (central and south Americans on the drug part) Who do you think grows all of the crops in California (As a state, the 6th largest economy in the world) And you want to compare these folks with Middle Eastern Arabs, NigNogs, etc.
    Mexicans work like fiends, with fiftyish women bent down all day picking strawberries. This has been going on since Eisenhower’s “Bracero Program.” Same Same in Florida and Texas. And last

    “California had the highest agricultural receipts in the United States in 2019 followed by Iowa, Nebraska, Texas and Minnesota.

    Ten (10) states generated over \$10 billion in agricultural cash receipts in 2019: California, Iowa, Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, & Indiana.”

    Do you think Wall Street, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley Schlomos, Arabs, and black gang-bangers can produce the same?
    As for the drug cartels, they would not exist, were it not for the demand in the Ole’ US of A. Opiods for the Rednecks who lost their jobs thanks to the Man. Who benefits from the poppy cultivation in Afghanistan

    • Replies: @Mevashir
    , @anarchyst
    , @Miro23
  120. @Agent76

    Schellenberger sold out to the anthropogenic climate destabilisation denial industry, so has ZERO credibility, despite the fact that any criticism of so-called ‘liberals’ in the USA could hardly fail to be cogent.

  121. Mevashir says:
    @Chris Moore

    End result: these ((Jews)) who are not Jews but anti-Moses and anti-Christ have infected much of the United States (and through it, the world) with their various mental diseases and moral and social pathologies via their accumulated Zionist network wealth, media power and governmental influence; the nation has become mentally ill as a result; and we are teetering on the brink of civil war.

    Interesting point. Jesus did say IF YOU BELIEVED IN MOSES YOU WOULD BELIEVE IN ME.

    [MORE]

    But I humbly submit that the American Revolution was an anti-biblical rebellion against the king God had placed over us. Some say it was abetted by the Jesuit Order, seeking to remove the American colonies from Great Britain in order to establish a Catholic-tolerant English-speaking entity. In that aspiration they appear to have been wildly successful:
    https://www.granddesignexposed.com/pdf/ROEpdf.pdf
    https://archive.org/details/rulersofevilf.tuppersaussy

    So you might wish to consider that the Jewish misfits (as you would call them) were invited to join a nation of Christian misfits. In other words the Christian Deists Free Masons and Enlightenment Atheists sowed the seeds of their own destruction and the Jewish influx was just the logical culmination of the misguided policies of the Founders.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  122. anarchyst says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    You are correct. It was a mistake to give corporations “personhood”. In legal terms, corporations are considered to be “persons”. However, they are not bound by constitutional principles and can do pretty much what they want. Witness the forcing of employees to take the “jab” under duress (the threat of job loss).
    If I had my way, corporations would be bound by constitutional principles.
    Regards,

  123. Mevashir says:
    @fasteddiez

    Mexicans work like fiends, with fiftyish women bent down all day picking strawberries. This has been going on since Eisenhower’s “Bracero Program.” Same Same in Florida and Texas.

    Total agreement. In my experience living across the country since 2006, Hispanics are extremely hard working disciplined and moral with strong family values. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that these mainly Catholic people have replaced the approximately 30 million aborted Americans since Roe v. Wade.

  124. I am reading this absolutely fantastic article as I am watching the news about 60 000 more Haitians making their way through Panama on their way to our southern border. We are doomed and we really have no where to go. All we can do is sit back and watch as they turn our once great country into the shithole they came from.

    • Agree: Etruscan Film Star
    • Replies: @Etruscan Film Star
  125. anarchyst says:
    @fasteddiez

    Your statement: “/As for the drug cartels, they would not exist, were it not for the demand in the Ole’ US of A. Opiods for the Rednecks who lost their jobs thanks to the Man. Who benefits from the poppy cultivation in Afghanistan”/
    …paints only a part of the picture…
    The “drug problem” is a feature, and not a bug.
    The CIA derives a major portion of its funding for its many “black projects” through the (illicit) drug trade. This is why you will never see the end of the criminalization of the (illegal) drug culture. There is too much money to be made.
    In fact, the mossad and other supranational organizations are a part of this “system”.
    Follow the shekels.

  126. JWalters says:
    @Ron Unz

    Mr. Hood repeatedly makes sweeping generalizations about huge groups of people. He does this by ignoring the MANY exceptions to his generalizations. For example, he ignores the fact that MOST blacks are NOT criminals so that he can characterize all blacks as criminals. Similarly, in order to glorify all whites as noble he ignores the centuries of white-on-white warfare, with whites slaughtering, backstabbing, robbing, and tyrannizing whites. He seems to have an extremely limited knowledge of world history, with his picture of history appearing to come mainly from John Wayne movies and the like. In his mind whites slaughtering non-whites is a glorious accomplishment, but non-whites defending themselves against whites is abhorrent.

    He seems to have no awareness of the concept of justice, but simply worships raw power, when wielded by whites. He does not understand that power without justice creates tyranny. He is essentially advocating white tyranny.

    He feels an emotional bond to the white race, but shows no awareness of the extreme variety of people that are in every race. Thus, his understanding of human nature is as simplistic as his understanding of history.

    It’s well-known that a strong emotion has the power to derail a person’s reason. That seems to be happening to Mr. Hood.

    • Troll: schnellandine
  127. @TKK

    The Lutherans are just as bad. I quit attending church because of their aiding and abetting of criminals.

    • Agree: TKK
  128. Beattitude

  129. Miro23 says:
    @Emslander

    Hitler said that the greatest cowards are the Center Right Bourgeoisie. (Republicans.)

    That’s right. Like he said:

    “Since the beginning of my political activity, I have made it a rule not to curry favour with the bourgeoisie. The political attitude of that class is marked by the sign of cowardice.”…. “the first years of my struggle were therefore concentrated on the object: win over the worker to the National Socialist Party.”

    Hitler’s Table Talk 1941 – 1944 Conversation nº 185 8th April 1941

  130. Facebook ‘whistleblower’: “I oppose Zuck because he doesn’t do enough of what he really wants to do(in cahoots with his fellow Jewish supremacist tribesmen).”

    It’s like a prostitute as ‘whistleblower’ complaining that her pimp doesn’t whore her out enough.

  131. Miro23 says:
    @fasteddiez

    Mexicans work like fiends, with fiftyish women bent down all day picking strawberries. This has been going on since Eisenhower’s “Bracero Program.” Same Same in Florida and Texas.

    Same in Spain. South American Indios are the hardest working immigrants – more on the manual side but also some businesses, and they’re strong on family values and don’t make trouble. The problem in South America seems to be that they don’t have political power (apart from Bolivia for a while – 62% Indio)

  132. Phibbs says:

    I think an ideal country for rationalists — let’s cal it the New Republic — would be to have no blacks, no Jews, no openly gay people and no Muslims, of course. However, I have no problem with 5% being comprised of non-Afro-Latinos — say Mexicans & Guatemalans who are, for the most part, Eurasian. Ten percent in the New Republic should be Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Nepali, etc. Asians are model citizens who assimilate quickly. Asian women would beautify the gene pool and Asians would raise the I.Q level. Sure, in 200 years, everyone in the New Republic will have black hair and brown eyes, but God doesn’t care about that. All that matters is that the evil races and white liberals won’t be around to plague the New Republic.

  133. JWalters says:
    @obwandiyag

    That is exactly what will happen. These simplistic generalizations about vast groups of people are fantasies. Just look at all the white-on-white violence throughout European history. Some of the most ignoble, backstabbing butchery and tyranny in the history of the human race. But that doesn’t fit the theory, so let’s leae all those facts out.

  134. @AReply

    Gay much? Verily, thou dost protest too much, which leads one to believe that it is YOU that wants the BBC in your anal orifice.

  135. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    I think Russia works better than the USA despite its tolerance for Jews and Muslims precisely because it is accepted that Russia’s core identity is Orthodox Christian. This identity is respected by outlying ethnic minorities, and the Russian State in turn respects their contributions to the society. In this Russia functions like a multi-ethnic Empire with a strong and stable core identity. Russia is a polyglot nation with a Russian Orthodox Christian soul.

    America is the very opposite. America has no soul. Its heart is mammon worship and its brain is arrogant meritocracy. Currently we witness a food fight for control of the American Empire. It’s up for grabs because there is no consensus about the cultural heart and soul of America. In America the group with the most toys (ie mammon) wins not only the battle for survival but also the struggle for national identity and supremacy.

    Karl Marx wrote THE GOD OF THE JEWS IS GOLD. Since the true god of America is mammon, therefore the Jews have taken over since they most assiduously worship and amass mammon.

    [MORE]

    Perhaps our only hope is to be incorporated into the Russian Empire, reverse engineering our purchase of Alaska 154 years ago. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/why-russia-gave-alaska-americas-gateway-arctic-180962714/

  136. KenH says:

    I am a White Nationalist. I’m writing this to convince you that you should be a White Nationalist — if you aren’t already.

    There are some well known content creators on the pro-white right who recoil and clutch their pearls at the thought of white nationalism.

    Like so many others, my awakening to what was at stake came during college.

    I grew up in a 96% white community and didn’t get to experience a racial cauldron until I went to college and then for about 2-3 years after college. In general blacks were highly antagonistic towards whites and often self segregated. Race relations certainly weren’t as they are depicted by Jewish media and TV shows which is whites = bad and non-whites = good.

    There was a small fringe group of mostly white professors and students who hated America. But back then the anti-American hatred of the profs was based more on class than race. Looking back most were old style communists who saw themselves as champions of the working class and poor regardless of race but at the time their attitude and tactics rubbed me the wrong way. Today it is much worse.

    In general mestizos are a little easier to get along with but there is hostility with some of them and if you are around enough of them you’ll see a streak of racial chauvinism.

    In high school I used to think Tom Metzger was a buffoon but after my experience I realized he was a sage.

    It is true that you might not be interested in race but race is interested in you. After my seven year experience dealing with blacks and Mestizos a racial consciousness was forced upon me as our declining demography relative to non-whites is forcing a race consciousness on healthy whites. It changed me and how I see the world now and forever.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  137. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mevashir

    I believe Jesus, heir to Moses, was sent to “cancel” these fraudulent ((Jews)) and their works. Christianity, therefore, is commanded to do this work. That’s why ((Jews)) and their lackeys want Christianity gone. That’s why they hate Moses and the restraints of the Ten Commandments, too.

    So the ((Jews)) are at war with Judaism, and at war with themselves. Top ((Jews)) and neocons know this, and are desperate to direct psycho-((Jewish)) rage outward (against Christianity, Nazis, Islamofascism, Arabs, Whites, etc) knowing that if it turns against itself, these top ((Jews)) are done.

    This is what’s behind Zionism/neocon/fake-‘liberal” pathological agitation, warmongering, and divide and rule. This is why ((Jew)) lackeys are going nuts, as well. They’ve made themselves subordinates to demented and doomed madmen. A ship of mad fools.

    • Replies: @Resartus
  138. Resartus says:
    @Memejon

    for example the Haitians are from central America now, which is now part of the US.

    Other than Central America is a political term and not a geographic one….
    From Panama to Canada is North America…..

  139. What animates the West isn’t ‘racism’ but Identitism or Identism for short.

    But not all identities are the same.

    If ‘racism’ is defined as meaning ‘our people are better than you guys’, the meaning of identititsm is more varied and depends on whose identity is at stake.

    There are basically five kinds of identititsm.

    1. Self-loathing identity.

    2. Self-negating identity.

    3. Apathetic identity.

    4. National Identity or self-preserving identity.

    5. Imperial Identity or aggressive identity.

    Self-loathing identity would be whiteness. It is ostracized, vilified, and condemned. White people can be good people ONLY BY condemning their own white identity, but the process is paradoxical because, in order for a white person to be expunged of his or her evil whiteness, he or she must first acknowledge his or her white identity, but then, identifying as white is ‘racist’. On the other hand, if he or she insists he or she isn’t white in the first place, he or she is also being ‘racist’ in refusing to face up to his or her ‘white privilege’ that comes with ‘white identity’.

    Self-negating identity would be like yellow or East Asian identity under globalism. So eager to fit into the New World Order and win its approval, it is eager to negate its uniqueness. It anxiously seeks acceptance and approval. It isn’t intensely self-loathing like white identitism but has to will to assert or preserve itself.

    Apathetic identity would be like with most Mexicans. Sure, Mexicans wave their flags on Mexican Day and etc, but there is no clear or meaningful sense of what Mexican-ness is all about. Most Mexicans and Latin Americans are pretty much apathetic about their identity, which becomes an issue only when their feel touchy about their inferiority complex vis-a-vis gringo.

    National identity would be like what Hindus got. Hindus are mindful of preserving their identity, culture, and heritage, but they see it as their business, their duty and obligation. They don’t try to make others praise, defend, or honor Hindus.

    Imperial identity would be like with Jews and blacks(and homos). Like Hindus, these groups feel much pride in their identity but that is NOT enough. If Hindus are content with Hindus preserving and defending Hindu-ness, Jews and blacks and homos demand that OUTSIDE groups praise, honor, celebrate, revere, and worship identities of Jews, blacks, and homos.

    So, even though most Americans and Europeans are not Jews, they all must worship Jews.
    So, even though most people are not homo, they must be made to wave the sodomy flag.
    So, even though most people in the West are not black, they must weep for the Noble Negro and pray for the eternal soul of George Floyd.
    Indeed, many people around the world put Jews, blacks, and homos before their own identity and people. Jewish/Black/Homo identities have imperial domination over them.

    This is how Identitism works. Its power and meaning change in accordance to the identity at hand.

    As Jews control the Identity Spectrum, they decide which identities are special, which are humdrum, and which are downright evil.

  140. @Automatic Slim

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain

    So how exactly was my post a troll, Mr. Mulga Knuckledragger??

  141. Bro43rd says:
    @AReply

    Projection on your part!

  142. FvS says:
    @obwandiyag

    Yes, we see this happening in Norway, Finland, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary, Japan, China, Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Botswana, etc. All hotbeds of intraracial conflict.

    Joking aside, I believe your point is that racial diversity is not the only type of diversity that can potentially cause divisions in society. This is obviously true, but the solution to problems caused by non-racial diversity isn’t to add racial diversity on top of them.

  143. Resartus says:
    @Chris Moore

    That’s why they hate Moses and the restraints of the Ten Commandments, too.

    You mean the Remains of the 100s of Commandments Moses broke when he caught them with the Golden Calf…..

  144. FvS says:
    @Ron Unz

    I strongly suspect that’s a big part of the reason that there seems to be almost zero White Nationalist sentiment in California

    Or California is just full of liberal white lemmings that are completely brainwashed by regime propaganda because everyone else saw the writing on the wall and left a long time ago.

    Imagine if there were millions of Latin Americans clamoring to get into China, South Korea, Japan, and Israel. These countries would almost certainly deny them entry. Do you think they would be acting irrationally in doing so?

    Would California be a better place today if it were 99% Hispanic mestizo? You’d have to be a moron to say yes…or maybe just a Jew.

  145. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the core ideals of traditional America as it existed 1607-1960: White identity, Protestant Christianity, Anglo-Saxon constitutional government, and a middle-class economy.

    This was absolutely, bar none, the greatest suite of cultural traits humanity has ever achieved.

    You claim conservatives have no goal. Here is mine: I want it all back. I will not settle for part of the list, as you and David French would in your different ways.

    What we are currently experiencing is most certainly not the logical culmination of America. It is, rather, the exact opposite, in every possible way, of traditional America.

    Instead of White self respect, we have an emergent caste system with deracinated Whites at the bottom.

    Instead of a Puritan Republic, we have unimaginable degeneracy.

    Instead of history’s greatest middle class, we have history’s most brazenly kleptocratic plutocracy, Janet Yellen printing untold trillions and simply giving it away to her cronies.

    And above all, instead of Anglo-Saxon ordered freedom we have the hellish totalitarianism of the shtetl.

    America didn’t fail, it was hijacked.

  146. @Happy Tapir

    These country folk from the Bible Belt respond none too kindly to the news that they are on the precipice of becoming a minority and permanently losing political power and control over their culture due to decades of mass Third World immigration. Lots of data is available on responses to questions on impeding white minoritization and the effects of this knowledge on immigration policy opinion, e.g. Eric Kaufman. Try inquiring with locals who live in any large metropolitan area in the South. They were part of the explosion of support that rocketed build-the-wall Trump into serious-candidate orbit on June 16, 2015 and are thus all white nationalists by default.

    • Replies: @Resartus
  147. Metropole says:

    There’s nothing wrong in trying to escape oppression and seeking a homeland for your own people. After all, America itself was built by people escaping from persecution in Europe.

    However, a few things need to be kept in mind.

    1) You need to accept that whatever America is, good or bad, is what white America has built. Whites are still a majority in the country and they control everything. You can’t be selective and say that good things, like technology, were created by whites and bad things, like LGBTQ, drugs, sexual debauchery etc. were caused by nonwhites.

    3) All other races are here with the approval of whites. Blacks were brought here, kicking and screaming, against their will. Most other nonwhites are legal immigrants. Even a single illegal alien cannot cannot enter the country if the government didn’t want it.

    3) Jews would have no power unless whites did what they were told. They are a tiny minority and only have power because whites follow them.

    4) Getting a homeland will mean that white separatists will be fighting a civil war against white unionists. Both sides will suffer.

    Having said that, here’s a potential map of the future Disunited States of America.

    1) America. Status quo liberal state. Jews will go here.
    2) Euromerica. White state.
    3) Afromerica. Will probably be aligned or united with liberal America.
    4) Aztlan. Mexican state.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Miro23
  148. @Ukraine Tiger

    America is in fact the economic and technological culmination of all great cultures of the past. America as an extension of Europe has also, in fact, created the entirety of the modern world and has created everything the World now wants and creates for itself. Your criticism is that of a spurned, jealous fâggot.

  149. @John Gruskos

    I have one quibble: your date of 1960. The slide started during the so-called “progressive” era, with the 19th Amendment and the income tax. Some would argue it started with the Civil War.

  150. @No Tattoos

    The best explanation can be found in “The Culture of Critique.”

  151. @Phibbs

    Sounds like a reasonable compromise.

  152. Rogue says:
    @Ray Caruso

    Only idiots waffle on about “no government”.

    There will be government, as there always has been, like it or not.

    The only debate is on the type and reach of actual government.

    • Replies: @Monotonous Languor
  153. Rogue says:
    @Ron Unz

    I dislike the term “White Nationalist”.

    I approve of the term “White Identity”.

  154. Rogue says:
    @Alfa158

    Nigerian American, I’m pretty sure.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  155. Excellent article. I, too, am a white nationalist, and a moral racist.

    As for being American, who or what is an American? There are no Americans now, just a gaggle of hyphenated-wannabees peddling their own special brands of civic nationalism, as pretense for tribal dominance. Those whites who by heritage should be Americans have turned into cringing racial masochists. What used to define an American was a Euro-steppe Christian heritage, fully engaged in an insistence on truth, NOT on being nice. While other cultures have built-in lies to smooth things over, true American culture never did that. Now that we have, we’ve committed civilizational suicide.

    America is finished. It’s a dead man walking. Assuming the next generation even cares, they will spit on the graves of previous generations for letting America slide into a dystopian nightmare.

    • Agree: KenH, Automatic Slim
  156. @geokat62

    Knowing the fate of South Africa or worse is awaiting my children and grandchildren, I actually get more than a little worked up.

    ‘South Africa today, North America tomorrow!’

    https://www.unz.com/ghood/endorsing-a-call-for-the-new-american-flag/#comment-4737859

  157. @Metropole

    Nah.

    The America that whites built with the Protestant Ethic was lost when the FED was formed in 1913.

    Jewish supremacy took hold back then and completely took over by 1965 and opened the borders.

    “1) You need to accept that whatever America is, good or bad, is what white America has built. Whites are still a majority in the country and they control everything. You can’t be selective and say that good things, like technology, were created by whites and bad things, like LGBTQ, drugs, sexual debauchery etc. were caused by nonwhites.”

    Utter bullshit…..whites don’t control ANYTHING. At this point whites are not even allowed to defend themselves against mobs of savage buckwheats.

    Are you smoking crack?

    JEWS push the globohomo tranny agenda, JEWS push drugs and degeneracy, JEWS push sexual debauchery, etc.

    This is obvious stuff pal.

    • Agree: Bookish1
  158. Miro23 says:
    @John Gruskos

    America didn’t fail, it was hijacked.

    Good post, but a well run, well prepared and well armed ship isn’t going to be hijacked. If post WW2 Anglo America had followed N E Asian type policies of national development (manufacturing and human skills) the US would still be by far the world’s dominant economic power.

  159. Miro23 says:
    @Metropole

    Having said that, here’s a potential map of the future Disunited States of America.

    1) America. Status quo liberal state. Jews will go here.
    2) Euromerica. White state.
    3) Afromerica. Will probably be aligned or united with liberal America.
    4) Aztlan. Mexican state.

    That’s not how civil wars usually turn out . Unless an outside power steps in (e.g. Korea) then one side will win militarily, invade and reintegrate enemy territory and suppress their opponents.

  160. Ron Unz says:
    @Rogue

    Nigerian American, I’m pretty sure.

    Actually, my strong impression is that “obwandiyag” is probably just an ordinary white American.

    His name does sound like it might vaguely be Nigerian, and that was probably my first impression. But it’s actually a form of the true name of Chief Pontiac, one of the greatest of the American Indian war-chiefs. I doubt any Nigerian would select it, while it might be reasonably expected from an anti-establishment white American of particular ideological leanings, whether or not he has a little Amerind ancestry. I think the comments of his that I’ve read tend to support this conclusion.

    If my guess is mistaken, he’s welcome to correct me.

    • Agree: Bombercommand
  161. @Just another serf

    I suggest Ron contract someone to write an uplifting column from time to time.

    Second the motion. It’s easy to forget that the alarming articles on this site, although generally true, aren’t the whole picture. Paying attention to counter-Woke events and activities is good for morale.

    • Agree: Just another serf
    • Replies: @Bookish1
  162. @Suncoastcraig

    We are doomed and we really have no where to go. All we can do is sit back and watch as they turn our once great country into the shithole they came from.

    I tagged “Agree” to your comment, because you called out the stark reality of the Haitian invasion (not to mention the overall population replacement).

    I can’t go along with your concluding lines (in the blockquote above), though. We can do a lot more than sit back and watch. As Lawrence of Arabia says in the film, “Nothing is written.”

    You’re right, things look bad now. But a well-planned and -executed counter-strategy can still turn the table faster than most of us envision.

  163. @Rogue

    Whatever form of government we may have in the future, one of its top priorities should be to ensure that narcissists, sociopaths, and psychopaths are prevented from ever rising to leadership positions.

  164. Emslander says:
    @Phibbs

    Racialists ought to dig a little deeper into genetic biology before they make sweeping statements. There will never be a fully mixed genetic characteristic in any species, whether it’s skin color in humans or tail length in dogs. A recessive gene characteristic will always produce a certain percentage of itself in the population, precisely BECAUSE it is recessive.

    I’m not going to do the math required to prove this, but see that perfectly blonde, blue-eyed people show up generation after generation in a population, even though the genetics of that population have been spun in a mixer for a thousand years.

    I’m sure the genetics experts here will support me on this.

  165. @Ron Unz

    Come on. You live in Whitopia, with a \$3 million admission fee.

    NINETY PERCENT WHITE AND ASIAN (60% whites with high-g, low-crime Asians they can point to and say, “Diversity,” are happier than pigs in shit.)

    Six percent Latino, two percent black.

    You bought your White Nation. Those of us without residuals and \$10M in the bank have to figure out other methods.

  166. Resartus says:
    @Eric Novak

    control over their culture due to decades of mass Third World immigration.

    The trash southerners worry most about are the ones immigrating from North of the Mason/Dixon line…..
    Yankees have been ruining Dixie for 50 years……..

  167. I’m writing this to convince you that you should be a White Nationalist — if you aren’t already.

    Ha ha, that’ll totally work with me. Bwahahahaha.

  168. @Emslander

    True, with enough recessive genes in a population, it’s inevitable that those genes will at some point be present in both breeding partners, and given enough breeding, those genes will inevitably be expressed at some point even if they have not been visible for many years.

  169. KenH says:

    Although this is one of Gregory Hood’s best articles yet he still refuses to mention the Jewish angle. Hood identifies himself as a white nationalist but is probably the only WN who won’t acknowledge Jewish power and influence in the dire predicament that whites find themselves in.

    The America of 2021 is a Jewish run hellscape. Joe “hair plugs” Biden is merely serving as their proxy who they will discard when he is no longer useful.

    Of course, pretty much every Republican presidential candidate is a Jew worshipper including Trump and DeSantis. Kushner destroyed Trump’s presidency with his strategy of heavy pandering and set asides to blacks and Latinos that alienated a small number of whites but enough that Trump lost key battleground states in 2020.

  170. Rurik says:
    @schnellandine

    The so-called BoR was a disaster, foretold at the time to end up exactly as it has. The only scrap of it worth a damn was the 10th amendment,

    where would America be today without the First Amendment, or the Second, which guarantees the rest.

    Look at Canada and Europe with their hate speech laws, and the throngs of innocent people languishing in prisons for simply speaking the truth.

    Right now there’s a 92 year old woman imprisoned in Germany whose only ‘offense’ in her life is saying true things that Jews don’t want said.

    Lysander Spooner is a personal hero of mine. But your quote was of the Constitution, and not the Bill of Rights specifically.

    I would imagine that if he were to write a Constitution, that it would start with the First and Second Amendments. The key to good government, is to let those know whom would govern, that they do so only with the consent of the governed. And that free men with guns are always there to help them remember that.

    I agree with your last bit.

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  171. Rurik says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    The Founding Fathers neglected to consider the Fourth Power of government-money.

    “That is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay no one.”

    ~ Benjamin Franklin

    The Currency Act of 1764 made the Colonial Script that Franklin had referred to in the earlier statement illegal.

    After the Currency Act went into effect, Franklin said:

    “In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.”

    While it isn’t taught in America’s governmnt schools, I suspect the Currency Act (perpetual debt slavery to Jewish Bankers) was a, (if not the main) motivating principle for telling King George to fuck off.

    Hence the USA has become a sham democracy, sham republic, sham society but very real oligarchy, run overwhelmingly by not just the rich, but one small section of the owners of the economy.

    this happened after Andrew Jackson’s heroic efforts to rein in these eternal scumbags even at the risk to his own life. And he did so, and the value of the dollar continued on for nearly another hundred years.

    Until Woodrow Wilson sold this nation, (and ultimately our civilization) down the river to assuage his vanity- at a cost to humanity of horrors and suffering that are literately unimaginable.

    The twentieth century was Woody’s doing, and so too will be the horrors and wars and terror and madness of the 21st.

    The Founders fought bloody wars to keep our currency solvent and interest free.

    Woody undid all of that in one administration, (while also facilitating Trotsky into Russia to foist unimaginable horrors and suffering, and also participated in the Great Betrayal of Germany at Versailles, thereby guaranteeing WWII and more horrors and suffering).

    How can you even quantify the evil of a man whose legacy is two world wars and communism, equaling the mass-murder, torture and rape of hundreds of millions of innocent people, leading ultimately to the death of the world’s greatest civilization?

    And all to stroke his vanity.

    • Agree: Bombercommand
  172. @Rurik

    As able intelligences argued then, and the existence of the 9th amendment attempted and failed to patch, enumerating ‘rights’ (foolish) tilts the field. The tyrannical fed then has been given a list, around which they can pummel people into submission. It implies inevitably, against written warning, that absence from the list is fair game for incursion. Things played out that way, and even inclusion on the list wasn’t help. Examine the venerated 1st amendment against the Sedition act and compare dates. Not even 10 years after the ratification of the 1st amendment, legislation passed nullifying it (unlawfully, naturally). And there went also the supremacy clause. One shot.

    If one is sincere about limiting federal power, which the Constitution pretended to do, why the 200′ breaches of the wall (‘general welfare’)? Hell, even reasonably tight contextual language (e.g. ‘necessary and proper’) gets misappropriated into oblivion. Why does one need a 2nd amendment against feds when the 10th amendment does the same thing? Why does one need a 1st (according to their demented incorrect reading) when there’s a 10th?

    [MORE]

    Re that dementia, how gone must the average worshiper be to even stomach discussion of ‘incorporation’? If law means anything, there is no discussion of ‘incorporation’, since the written law could hardly be clearer: The ‘BoR’ applies to the several states except as explicitly excluded (e.g., by the first word of the 1st amendment). Just a bunch of morons whacking in circles.

    If written edicts were worth a damn, the Constitution wouldn’t exist, as its initiation was forbidden by ‘law’. If written law meant anything, the Articles of Confederation would bind to this day, as they specified (wrongly, but when arguing in a pool of insanity, keep things insane).

    The whole thing was and is a naked power feast.

    When people worship the Constitution (of which the BoR is, and not a separate entity immune from Spooner’s ax), most of them worship an ideal. That ideal was stomped at the starting gate, but they remain tender and teary eyed. Why — Psychosis? Stockholm syndrome?

    The Constitution was written vaporous and ambiguous, I suppose intentionally. For example, the 4th amendment sounds grand and protective, until you attempt to nail it down and it slips from your grasp. You then recognize that it means nothing. One can do nearly anything with that tissue ‘binding’ the wrists.

    May every single author of the US Constitution remain in hell until its wiped from the earth except as a cautionary example of how to enslave others without them knowing.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @Rurik
  173. FvS says:
    @Ron Unz

    Some more thoughts:

    1.) What are you basing your opinion on that there is almost zero white nationalist sentiment in California? Poizner vs Whitman in the 2010 primary? Because Poizner was initially doing poorly but then climbed back up to become a threat to Whitman after he began taking a more hard-line stance on immigration. This pushed Whitman to the right on immigration. She was not a pro-immigration moderate in the primary.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2010/05/immigration-pushes-whitman-to-right-037893
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-may-03-la-me-debate-20100503-1-story.html

    2.) According to the SLPC, there are numerous anti-immigration and white nationalist groups operating in California.

    3.) I guarantee you live in some rich, lily-white neighborhood and have no experience with race relations on the ground among the working class. Nor have you been exposed to the general decrease in quality of life or rise in petty crime that has come about as whites have been displaced by mestizos. Just because someone isn’t a white nationalist, that doesn’t mean they are necessarily a pro-immigration, diversity lover. Most whites just grudgingly tolerate the negatives of increased diversity because that’s what they are told to do or they convince themselves that things aren’t really that bad because being racist is the worst sin in America.

    4.) It’s my belief that Jews purposefully exacerbate black dysfunction and promote blacks in all forms of media in order to keep race conscious whites distracted from their displacement by Hispanic mestizos/indios and so that Hispanics look better by comparison. You’ll notice that Hispanics, although more numerous than blacks, are hardly featured in media at all. I’d argue that Asians at around 7% of the population are depicted in media more than Hispanics at around 20% of the population. It wouldn’t surprise me if Hispanic crime is also suppressed in the news. The whole idea is to make sure whites think about Hispanics and immigration as little as possible. Of course, when cartel violence and Latin American political corruption inevitably takes hold in the U.S., that task is going to be increasingly difficult. But by then it may be too late.

  174. KenH says:
    @schnellandine

    The Constitution was written vaporous and ambiguous, I suppose intentionally.

    Perhaps. Counter Currents published some good articles about our reverence for the Constitution some time ago. The question they attempted to answer was is the Constitution failing us or is it working like it’s supposed to? IOW does it contain poison pills throughout that were intended to expand and empower the federal government at the expense of the states?

    Even if it’s the latter I don’t believe the founders would approve of the monstrosity that we have today. The federal government can destroy our lives for any or no reason and they do as the Jan. 6th protesters and other recent examples have shown us.

    The 14th amendment and so called civil rights laws have been used to tear the social fabric to threads and create a state of black and non-white racial supremacy. Civil rights laws have been selectively applied and misapplied for partisan political purposes and should be repealed or struck down by the federal courts but that will never happen.

    Civil rights laws taken on a life of their own and have become a parallel Constitution that the elites show more loyalty to.

    • Replies: @JackOH
    , @schnellandine
  175. @Rurik

    Don’t tell me about Kolomoisky. As soon as the conflict in eastern Ukraine began, I lost most of my life savings which were sitting in the PrivatBank. No trace.

  176. JackOH says:
    @KenH

    KenH, good comment.

    You got me thinking about Hans-Hermann Hoppe, and his big-picture thinking about the weird-shit incentives and related phenomena created under our legalistic, “democratic” smother government. We talk about some of those better known incentives and phenomena here: AFDC ( can’t recall what it’s called now), public choice theory, etc.

    I’m no scholar of the subject. But, I’d wager a nickel that if you could grasp the whole kaleidoscope of “fractured” incentives pressed on top of all of us, you might get some sort of explanation for why so many of our fellow Americans are demoralized, “brittle”, and can’t seem to tell right from wrong, good from evil.

    “Monstrosity” is probably a good characterization, especially when you add the roles played by our 25,000-some political lobbies, the mass media, and the bureaucracies.

    • Agree: KenH
  177. Rurik says:
    @schnellandine

    The Constitution was written vaporous and ambiguous, I suppose intentionally. For example, the 4th amendment sounds grand and protective, until you attempt to nail it down and it slips from your grasp. You then recognize that it means nothing. One can do nearly anything with that tissue ‘binding’ the wrists.

    There were existential flaws.

    Not recognizing the humanity of the Negro slaves* was a fundamental flaw, and like all fundamental flaws, you can’t build something lasting on sand.

    But it was the best attempt made to date. Humans are hardwired to dominate their fellows. It’s a need, and an unfortunate (and vile) vestage of our time as tribal wanderers, with a strong cheiftan. Like dogs, humans vie for the alpha status.

    Just look at human history, and you’ll see that as soon as there was civilization, there was tyranny. Master and slave was the rule for most of human history all across the globe.

    It remains so in much of the world today. In England, there are peerages that elevate certain citizens to a higher legal status simply based on their heredity.

    So the attempt to create a free people with a Constitution that guaranteed their rights, was a momentous thing.

    What you’re lamenting, is that the American people were (and certainly are) simply not worthy to bear the burdens, and reap the amazing rewards of freedom.

    Rather, they subverted the document and betrayed its intent for their own personal advantage. They should have hanged for it, but the American people had lost the mettle they had when that document was created and signed.

    Was it flawed? Sure. But the noble intentions were there.

    First came the (not so) ‘Civil War’, which created “These United States, while murdering The United States. That was the first great blow to the document and to the American people’s freedom.

    And from there we’ve all seen how America has marched into the abyss, betraying the Constitution all the way, until today it’s simply a shadow of what it once was.

    But, nevertheless, as I’ve mentioned, we still have the legacy of those great men’s aspiration to bequeath freedom to their progeny, because we still have as yet, the Second Amendment. Without that codified, sanctified law, we dissident Americans would have been marched to the edge of a ditch somewhere, and given the Katyn Forest treatment by now.

    Merrick Garland’s nights are tormented by bouts of rancorous angst and sweaty bed sheets, because the American people are still free to call him a filthy, stinking Jew, conniving and scheming to be the next Kaganovich to lord it over the pitiful and doomed victims of his genocidal wrath, but for that God damned Second Amendment!

    Just knowing that that filthy piece of shit is not going to be able to have dissidents flayed to the bone, or their women raped wholesale, because of the lingering legacy of our Founders, is what I’ll take for the moment. It’s a good moment, and I’ll savor it well.
    .
    .
    .
    * they never should have been broght here, and they should have been sent back, but whitey’s blind greed was and will be his undoing.

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  178. anarchyst says:

    Previous to the “War of Northern Aggression”, the united States of America was an umbrella organization holed up in Washington DC and had very few enumerated powers.
    A person residing within a particular state considered himself to be a citizen of that state, NOT an American citizen. A person residing within the state of Virginia considered himself to be a “citizen of Virginia”, NOT a “citizen of the united States”.
    The word “united” was never capitalized as the federal government was subordinate to the states except for the powers to “coin money”, “establish a post office” and “provide for the common defense” raising an army composed of state citizens in case of insurrection, no more.
    That all changed after the “War of Northern Aggression” was concluded. The federal government obtained powers not granted to it by the Constitution. It was all downhill from there.
    We would be better off if “the several states” told the federal government to “take a hike” and restore the power that the states have always had, the federal government being subordinate to the states.
    Of course, that idea is pretty much lost ever since the “War of Northern Aggression” was concluded and in today’s society as well.
    Repeal of the 16th and 17th amendments would be a good start…

    • Thanks: James McLaren
    • Replies: @Rurik
  179. Rurik says:
    @anarchyst

    That all changed after the “War of Northern Aggression” was concluded. The federal government obtained powers not granted to it by the Constitution. It was all downhill from there.

    You’re right, and I wrote it backwards

    First came the (not so) ‘Civil War’, which created “These United States, while murdering The United States. That was the first great blow to the document and to the American people’s freedom.

    should be

    First came the (not so) ‘Civil War’, which created “The United States, while murdering These united States. That was the first great blow to the document and to the American people’s freedom

  180. I always felt cheated.

    It wasn’t because I lacked for anything.

    I was cheated at birth, and lacking of, a whole body, aka intact genital structures.

    100+ MILLION other American baby boys suffered the same fate.

    Blasted Medical Establishment. Curse them to hell.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  181. @KenH

    Even if it’s the latter I don’t believe the founders would approve of the monstrosity that we have today.

    They’d approve only if they were in charge. They were scum, same as anyone who attempts to rule free men. All of their yodeling about liberty went out the door as soon as the British were ousted. Each of them needs a long overdue kick in the nuts.

    Not kidding, BTW. ‘Founder’ fanaticism is one of the core problems that led us to today. They (all but anti-federalists) need to be sent down the river psychologically. They didn’t give a damn about the long-term future of the association they brought about. It was done to benefit themselves in the short term, with enough morsels thrown to the gullible to enable the installation of The Permanent Rapist Class.

    • Replies: @KenH
  182. @Rurik

    I’m lamenting not what happened under the Constitution, but that it was allowed to be inserted into the land at a convenient time (when tired people not eager to resist supposed countrymen). The only ones with noble intentions were the anti-federalists, who’ve been proven right across the board.

    Regarding ‘Civil War’, I see you placed it in quotes, but perhaps only because of another meaning of ‘civil’. I protest nearly every instance of calling the USA/CSA war a civil war, because it didn’t meet even the base definition of the term. Perhaps the revolutionary war did, in which case it’s the only hot civil war in US history. Calling 1860s a civil war is accepting a twisted and false history. CSA made their own country and wanted to be left to make their way. USA didn’t allow. Sickness. A war between two countries is not a civil war. Conquest and aggression, materially only on one side.

    Of course, I don’t agree on the 2nd amendment, which I think is pure trash, both in its existence and the atrocious setup clause. We’ll never know, but I believe it only hastened the attempt to eliminate private gun ownership. Caution on assuming that text will do anything to prevent the dream of gun confiscation. I can think of at least 2 ways for the state to take most of the guns without much opposition, and the conditions are swirling to form those clouds.

    The 2nd amendment won’t protect any gun owner.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  183. Bookish1 says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    It is hard to find much that is uplifting when we are in the dark ages.

  184. Rurik says:
    @schnellandine

    Calling 1860s a civil war is accepting a twisted and false history. CSA made their own country and wanted to be left to make their way. USA didn’t allow. Sickness. A war between two countries is not a civil war. Conquest and aggression, materially only on one side.

    excellent point

    what, I wonder is going to be the result when some state, (Texas perhaps) decides to take the inevitable step, and free themselves from the depraved chains of bondage to the DC fiend.

    If it happens in our lifetimes, then many Americans are going to understand what the “Civil” war was all about.

    What I’d like to know is who would actually fight for the fiend?

    Everybody I know would either fight for Texas, or go to a safe space and cry at how so many people can be so racist.

    For Texas, they’d be fighting for freedom and a future for their children.

    For the fiend, they’d be fighting for Climate Justice, vaccine mandates, BLM, Israel, radical Islam, LGBTQ, La Raza and feminism.

    What would such a war look like when the fighting started?

    The 2nd amendment won’t protect any gun owner.

    I agree with you on the Federalists, and perhaps you’re right about the Second. But it has protected gun owners (for the most part) at least until today.

    And surely, that’s something, no?

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  185. @Rurik

    For the fiend, they’d be fighting for Climate Justice, vaccine mandates, BLM, Israel, radical Islam, LGBTQ, La Raza and feminism.

    Since I’m now 91% sure we’re in a computer simulation, I try to suppress surprise over anything evincing stupidity of masses.

    about the Second. But it has protected gun owners (for the most part) at least until today.

    That’s the part I don’t agree with. I do not think the 2nd amendment, as part of the ‘Bill of Rights’, has protected gun owners. It was ostensibly used to thwart encroachments, on that we agree, but I believe most or all of those encroachments were enabled by a federal state emboldened by the power handed it because of the BoR.

    It’s a common but little appreciated phenomenon that presenting lines/standards encourages human frailty around them and discourages excellence. On one hand people stop at the line (standard met, go back to sleep). On the other, tyrants encroach everywhere up to the line (victim comfortable), and wait until power and acclimation bend it.

    For example, parboiled frogs gun owners typically feel at peace if only further offenses are parried or forestalled—holding the line. But that line was curved into silliness long ago. The violations of the 2nd amendment are legion, to the point where it may as well not exist.

    And it trains ‘good-thinking’ shooters to encourage all around them to “get your concealed carry permit”. What‽ How about instead get a mob together and hang anyone threatening an offense so unAmerican as a ‘permit’ to carry a concealed gun. Who are these superhuman demi-deities who may issue permission to exercise a fundamental right? I want to see their halo permits.

    I’ll stop there before launching 1,500 words against the NRA frauds.

    No one knows, but it seems logical to me that gun owners would have fared better without the entire ‘Bill of Rights’, except maybe the 10th amendment by itself, and even more so if the Constitution disease had been thwarted before it festered. To remain free, something must occasionally reawaken in a people that they mustn’t get comfortable. Constitutions encourage comfort, just until the pillow covers the face.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  186. KenH says:
    @schnellandine

    Not kidding, BTW. ‘Founder’ fanaticism is one of the core problems that led us to today.

    There’s also anti-founder father fanatacism. The left hates them because they were “white supremacists” and slave owners but obviously you don’t fall in that camp. You seem to think they were deceitful and duplicitous men who didn’t really believe in their ideals of government and would be smiling from beyond the grave at the Jewish dictatorship that now rules us.

    That some might have been hypocrites is debatable but many of the concerns and fears expressed by the anti-federalists have shown them to be prescient.

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  187. JackOH says:
    @schnellandine

    schnell—, am I reading you correctly?

    I’m getting the idea you’re saying that a black-letter legal Constitutional right induces political sloth/torpor among its beneficiaries, and encourages opponents of those legal rights to develop work-arounds to circumstantially eviscerate those rights. The letter remains, but the spirit of the right is gone. Something like that?

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  188. @JackOH

    With the understanding that no document can confer an unalienable right, that’s a good start, along with, regarding the ‘Bill of Rights’, this text which perhaps says it better than I ever did or will, likely insincerity of the writer notwithstanding:

    I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colourable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretence for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason, that the constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority, which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication, that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it, was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights.

  189. JackOH says:

    Thanks!

    I read it with non-expert eyes, and it does seem a gem of psychological acuity.

    FWIW–I always thought it weak for folks at conservative gatherings to bang on about abrogation of “our Constitution” or “our rights” (as in BoR), when it’s likely a safe bet that many of them were okay with that abrogation when they benefited from it.

    • Agree: schnellandine
  190. @KenH

    The left hates them because they were “white supremacists” and slave owners but obviously you don’t fall in that camp.

    [MORE]

    If they were rational white supremacists, thinking ahead for other whites, it wouldn’t bother me as much as what they did. I strongly oppose slavery of any arguable human, and would have been fine with every one of the worshiped vermin (slaving ‘founders’) being killed. Slavery was a prime tool used by jews to subdue us. It was a crafty attack—some would argue superior—but much driven by ‘founder’ sociopathy and its detritus. Jew groups are masters of projecting guilt, binding generations with it.

    You seem to think they were deceitful and duplicitous men who didn’t really believe in their ideals of government and would be smiling from beyond the grave at the Jewish dictatorship that now rules us.

    Not quite. Agree on the ‘deceitful and duplicitous’, but not that they’d smile upon jews. I figure they’d be pissed. But what did they expect? No, as well as they could, they raped the land and their betters with timing sufficient to surpass their deaths—but not by much.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  191. anarchyst says:
    @schnellandine

    When it comes to jews, slavery is still an accepted “condition” to this day. It has never been formally renounced in any jewish doctrine or publication, the talmud included.

    • Agree: schnellandine
  192. BlackFlag says:
    @Just another serf

    If you’re pro transhumanism then you can find uplifting content on here about how are sorry species will soon be replaced by our betters.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gregory Hood Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Hidden Information in Our Government Archives
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
How America was neoconned into World War IV