The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGuillaume Durocher Archive
In Face of Yellow-Vest Critics, France Moves to Criminalize Anti-Zionism
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information

Alain Finkielkraut being confronted by yellow-vest protesters.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The French Jewish intellectual Alain Finkielkraut was recently profusely insulted by yellow-vests on the margins of a demonstration. This attack has been widely-portrayed as anti-Semitic, even though the yellow-vests in question explicitly attacked Finkielkraut as a Zionist. As Damien Viguier, the anti-Zionist intellectual Alain Soral’s lawyer, observed:

Alain Finkielkraut was called “a dirty Zionist shit (a Zionist two times again and “shit” perhaps three times more), a “fascist,” a “racist (two times), and “hateful.” He was asked to leave the demonstration in direct times: “get out of here” (twice), “piss off,” “go back home to Israel!” I can see in all this insults, or defamatory comments, I would even grant a light violence, but I find no trace of a discriminatory motivation. This shows well that the words “anti-Semite” and “anti-Semitic” are used in an absolutely arbitrary manner.

It is true that “Zionist” is often used as a euphemism for “Jew.” But it is also true that many anti-Zionists are happy to befriend genuinely anti-Zionist Jews such as Gilad Atzmon (himself an associate of Soral’s). Finkielkraut was likely attacked for his values rather than his ethnicity.

This subtlety did not prevent the incident from triggering a veritable pro-Semitic moral panic across the entire politico-media class. The media lamented the “anti-Semitic” attack on Finkielkraut and he was comforted by politicians from across the political spectrum, from the far-left to the far-right, including the bulk of prominent nationalist and identitarian figures.

Much of the foreign press (the London Times, The Jerusalem Post, the Jewish Telegraph Agency . . .) misrepresented things further, claiming that Finkielkraut had been called a “dirty Jew.” This is a genuine example of fake news.

Then a Jewish cemetery in the Alsatian village of Quatzenheim was desecrated, with over 90 tombstones being sprayed with with swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans. One tombstone was sprayed with the words: “Elsassisches Schwarzen Wolfe,” meaning “Alsatian Black Wolves,” an Alsatian nationalist group which has been inactive since 1981 . . . Of course, a hate hoax cannot be excluded: one thinks of the recent Jussie Smollett debacle or the Israeli-American who instigated 2000 supposed anti-Semitic bomb and shooter threats over the years.

For those whom anecdotal evidence was not sufficient, the regime also trotted out the usual “statistics” about, seemingly released every year of every decade, showing a massive increase in “anti-Semitic” acts. I will only say that such statistics are dubious in general, repetitive, and obviously ethnically and politically convenient. Grand old man Jean-Marie Le Pen commented:

There is no anti-Semitism in France which would justify a mobilization of public opinion. . . . Incidentally, we’re given a figure of a 74% increase in [anti-Semitic] attacks. Compared to what? I ask that we have the list of all these attacks committed against the Jews, in such a way that we can actually tell the difference between a graffiti, a murder, a telephone call, or a schoolyard scuffle. It is true that radical Islamism is extrapolating in a sense the Israeli-Arab conflict into France. It is much more a matter of anti-Zionism than anti-Semitism.

Regardless of whether the Quatzenheim incident is authentic, and it could well be, this event immediately prompted a solemn visit by the President of the Republic himself, Emmanuel Macron. This was followed by a national call to demonstrate against anti-Semitism, initiated by the Socialist Party but with virtually the entire political class following suite.

The response of both of the indigenous French people and the Africans/Muslims was lackluster however. According to the official media, some 20,000 people demonstrated in Paris and negligible amounts in the rest of the country. Actually, as the 20,000 figure was provided by the Socialist Party itself, we can be sure that this is an overstatement.

Serge Klarsfeld, one of the leading lights of the highly-profitable local holocaust industry, could not conceal his disappointment, telling the top journalist Jean-Pierre Elkabbach (a fellow Jew[1]Soral has observed that while Jews make up only 1% of the French population many French talk shows resemble “a little Jewish theater.” This disparate outcome and ethnic privilege should be noted.) on television:

The masses were not there. The crowd was not there. The French on the whole were not there. There were demonstrations, but I was there, I was there with my entire family and I saw a lot of familiar faces. But the crowd did not come, and which is indignant, should have come. . . . In Lyon there were 1500 or 2000 people. That is not a lot for a big city like Lyon. The crowd was absent and those who were not Jewish were generally absent!

This is in stark contrast with the similar 1990 Carpentras Affair, during which a Jewish cemetery was also desecrated. The pro-Semitic demonstrators following this incident numbered over 200,000 in Paris alone. The event was skillfully exploited by the Socialist President François Mitterrand and by the politico-media class in general by abusively linking this event to Jean-Marie Le Pen’s rapidly-rising Front National (FN). This contributed to making the FN unhandshakeworthy and to preventing any alliance between Le Pen’s nationalists and the mainstream conservatives, which would have spelled doom for the Left. It was later shown that the FN had nothing to do with the incident, which had apparently been instigated by a handful of neonazis with no links to the party.

People should generally speculate less about the authenticity of an event (e.g. 9/11, the Reichstag Fire), which is often difficult to prove one way or the other, than on whether the event has been used as a pretext by the ruling elite to do something questionable or disproportionate (often something which it had been hankering to do for a long time), which is typically quite easy to demonstrate.

This time, as Klarsfeld complains, the gentiles were not so interested in these theatrics. However, the event is having significant political and legal effects. The Macron regime is exploiting the incident to implement measures which have long been demanded by the CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France), the country’s powerful official Jewish lobby. Macron himself appeared before the (very conveniently-timed, as it happens) CRIF annual dinner, where the crème de la crème of the French political class regularly appear, in a solemn ritual of solidarity and genuflection before the Lobby-That-Doesn’t-Exist.

French President Emmanuel Macron with CRIF President Francis Khalifat (himself the successor to the long-time present Roger Cuckierman, you can’t make some things up).

Macron made a number of promises to the CRIF:

  • Three small “anti-Semitic” nationalist groups would be banned (Bastion Social, Blood & Honor Hexagone, and Combat 18).
  • A new law strengthening the state’s already considerable ability to censor anything it deems to be “hate speech” on social media (the French government is among the world leaders in demanding and obtaining the suppression of content on Twitter, behind only Turkey and Russia).
  • Most significantly, France would adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s “working definition of anti-Semitism,” which ludicrously includes anti-Zionism as an integral part of anti-Semitism. Thus, Jewish organizations and the French government are moving to outright criminalize opposition to Jewish ethno-nationalism (the definition of Zionism) all the while criminalizing all Western ethno-nationalisms as being discriminatory, hateful, xenophobic, etc.

This was quickly followed the European Union me-too-ers in Brussels making their own proposals for an “anti-Semitism pact,” notably aimed at punishing Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s campaign raising awareness around international financial speculator George Soros’ multi-million dollar efforts to flood Europe with migrants and undermine traditional European culture and ethnic identity.

Surprisingly, Soral’s anti-Zionist and civic nationalist association Égalité & Réconciliation actually hailed Macron for resisting the CRIF’s demands, bowing to them only reticently, and in some cases only symbolically. After all E&R itself, the most prominent anti-Zionist organization in France, will not be banned. The social-media censorship legislation will only be presented in parliament in May. And, apparently, France’s redefinition of anti-Semitism to include anti-Zionism will not be legally-binding, but will be used to educate to policemen and judges (go figure). All this, E&R surmises, left the CRIF’s audience underwhelmed. And, E&R notes that the CRIF’s demands are “extremely anti-popular and legally untenable . . . unless there is a complete shift to a communitarian [ethnic] dictatorship.”

Let us return to the original “victim” of all this, Alain Finkielkraut. Following the incident, an immediate “investigation” was launched of the various “perpetrators,” showing the absurd judicialization of French life. Finkielkraut, recently appointed as one of the forty “Immortals” of the Académie française, has been known to the younger generation primarily as an anti-racist Jew turned neoconservative once he realized Islamic immigration to France was bad for the Jews. He has become a popular Internet meme for his numerous televized hysterical outbursts: “Shut up! Shut up!”

Personally I haven’t followed Finkielkraut very closely and whenever I listen to him his discourse sounds like over-complicated pilpul. That said, he has objectively voiced a number of French identitarian concerns over the years. In 2005 he correctly and controversially told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz: “People say that the French national [football] team is admired because it is black-blanc-beur [black, white, Arab]. In reality, the national team is today black-black-black, which makes it the laughingstock of Europe.” There was clearly an element of rivalry in claiming the status of top ethnic victim. Finkielkraut also told Haaretz:

I was born in Paris and am the son of Polish himmigrants, my father was deported from France, his parents were deported and murdered at Auschwitz, my father returned from Auschwitz to France. This country deserves our hatred. And what it did to my parents was far more brutal than what it did to the Africans. And what did it do to the Africans? Nothing but good. My father was forced to endure hell for five years. And I was never taught hatred. Today the blacks’ hatred is even stronger than the Arabs’.

In 2017, upon the death of the French rock singer Johnny Hallyday, Finkielkraut told the right-wing journalist Élisabeth Lévy (another fellow Jew, at once moderately anti-Muslim and hysterical on anti-Semitism): “the little people, the little whites went in to the streets to say adieu to Johnny. […] The non-natives[2]Actually, the non-souchiens, the non-French-by-blood. Souchien is a term coined by “anti-colonial” Arab-Berber racial activists. It is a homophone for sous-chien, “sub-dog.” shone by their absence.”

Alain Finkelkraut’s based & red-pilled critics
Alain Finkelkraut’s based & red-pilled critics

In the footage of his “assault” by the yellow-vests, Finkielkraut however played his role to perfection, bearing his grotesque attackers’ insults with calmness and dignity. He then appeared on the radio to discuss the incident and emphasized that the attackers were probably of Islamic origin:

When one hears this slogan, “France is ours” [pronounced by one of the yellow-vests], one could thinks this is a variant of “France for the French” of classical fascism. But in fact no: he is saying “France is ours, it belongs to us Islamists.” He therefore is a believe in the theory of the Great Replacement. I do not say this Great Replacement is taking place, but for him it should take place. And for him, the Jews should be the first to be kicked out.

One will appreciate the utter tartuffery of claiming an opponent is promoting the Great Replacement while denying that it is taking place.

I will take this opportunity to emphasize again the Soviet-style absurdity of the French politico-media class’s denial of the Great Replacement. The replacement of the indigenous French population by both European and non-European (overwhelmingly African/Muslim) allogenes is visible in every major French city and, increasingly, in towns and villages across the country. And yet, our treacherous ruling elite, media, and even Wikipedia claim that all talk of a Great Replacement is a mere “conspiracy theory.” I’m not sure even Pravda’s claims concerning the workers’ paradise were so bold.

As it happens, Finkielkraut’s attackers seem to have been Muslims and one, “Benjamin W.,” appears to be an indigenous French convert. It seems quite likely that they were indeed influenced by Soral or at least the multiracial “patriotic” anti-Zionist culture he has created.

All in all, these events are illustrative of the French and Franco-Jewish elites manias for anti-Semitism and the growing indifference of the French and Afro-Islamic populations to such theatrics. The Lobby-That-Doesn’t-Exist – denounced by French leaders as varied as Charles de Gaulle, Raymond Barre, and François Mitterrand – continues to play the victim. But their power is weakening; and they know it. Macron himself, a convinced high-globalist, is only moderately interested in these matters. Many leading Jews, Bernard-Henri Lévy and Daniel Cohn-Bendit, have been extraordinarily alarmed by the uncontrolled and populist nature of the yellow-vest movement. Time will tell if this movement will participate in France’s liberation from globalism and the lobby’s distorting influence.


[1] Soral has observed that while Jews make up only 1% of the French population many French talk shows resemble “a little Jewish theater.” This disparate outcome and ethnic privilege should be noted.

[2] Actually, the non-souchiens, the non-French-by-blood. Souchien is a term coined by “anti-colonial” Arab-Berber racial activists. It is a homophone for sous-chien, “sub-dog.”

Hide 211 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Renoman says:

    This will make even more people hate the Jews if that is possible?

    • Replies: @Willem
  2. Rational says:


    Thanks for the article, Sir. It is a shame that Macron is sinking deeper into the gutter and turning France into an evil empire, and a worse police state. Macron truly is the face of evil. He needs to be tried for his crimes against humanity.

    The Judaists must have paid him a few more Jewrows under the table to bark for them and criminalize moral behavior, so the real criminals (the Zionists) can do their dirty evil deeds without fear of anybody speaking out against them.

    The Jewish motto is—if you can’t beat them, criminalize them!

    Why? Why are the Judaists so afraid of criticism of their religion, Israeal and their other bad deeds?

    The reason is simple—they are afraid of other Judaists! They are afraid that other Judaists will find out that the Judaists are really a bad people, Israel is really a criminal state and Judaism is really “a gutter religion” (as per Louis Farrakan) and they will leave Judaism, and there will not be enough sayanim to help the Judiasts on Top (JOT), the Oligarchs, to loot the public, exploit Sayanim women, and help them with their lives of crime.

    So the Judaists are scared of other Judaists—finding out the truth and so they want to suppress it.

    • Agree: apollonian
    • Replies: @Reuben Kaspate
  3. ‘…It is true that “Zionist” is often used as a euphemism for “Jew.”…’

    And? How is this to be avoided? Should it be avoided?

    Let’s review. A ‘Zionist’ is someone who thinks there should indeed be a Jewish state in Palestine. Most Jews are to a greater or lesser extent Zionists — the number who actually oppose the existence of Israel is very small.

    If Jews object to being conflated with Zionists, they’re welcome to stop supporting Israel. When as few Jews support Israel as — say — there were German-Americans who supported Hitler, I’ll be happy to attempt to see the difference.

    In the meantime, how are we to make make the distinction? I suppose one can observe that there are many Zionists who aren’t Jews, but they’re shits too. What exactly is desired?

    I’ll tell you what is desired — that there be no criticism of Israel.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Ralph B. Seymour
  4. A lot of head-scratching in the German media over Finkielkraut. Since he – especially in the beginning of the affair, made his point time and again: No antisemitic attack on him, but an anti-zionist attack.

    And apropos the great replacement: Finkielkraut added in the German daily die weLT and in the weekly Die ZEIT, that Merkel’s Failure (=her open border politics – still going on…) is a big failure indeed – and not only, because it brings with it lost of imported antisemitism!

    Finally: Finkilkraut is still with Christophe Guilluy in saying, that the Yellow Vests indeed do have a point about Macron’s big scale abandonment of his own french lower middle class!

    All in all – Finkielkraut is no bad guy at all these days.

  5. Franz says:

    I ask that we have the list of all these attacks committed against the Jews, in such a way that we can actually tell the difference between a graffiti, a murder, a telephone call, or a schoolyard scuffle.

    Grand old man or not, good to know somebody is thinking.

    Even here in flyover country, USA, there are now Security Guards posted in some small town libraries. If two lads get in a shoving match at the doorway and one is white and one is not, the guard must report it as a “racially motivated incident”.

    Something people need to keep in mind whenever statistics on Hate Crimes are posted — most of them are crap like that.

    The fix is in on the Yellow Vests, I think. The masters of the Global Village can’t let this spread. Watch for more arguments on the street described as “the New Holocaust” and the game will be over for good.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @skedaddle
  6. The replacement of the indigenous French population is visible in every major French city

    …and it gladdens the Jewish heart:

    ‘In France, the official Jewish community has consistently been in favor of immigration by non-Europeans. Recently the French Jewish community reacted strongly to pronouncements by actress Bridgette Bardot that “my country, France, has been invaded again by a foreign population, notably Muslims” (Forward, May 3, 1996, 4). Chaim Musiquant, executive director of CRIF, the umbrella organization for French Jewry, stated that Bardot’s statement “skirt[ed] at the edge of racism.”’—MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, p293

    Finkielkraut says that France deserves the Jews’ hatred. Hatred works both ways, Alain.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  7. Another story of how Jewish ethnonationalism is all kosher, while European nationalisms are a ” betrayal of patriotism” (in Macron’s own words).

    Anyhow, excellent article.

    Guillaume Durocher is the French Kevin McDonald, but even better in many respects, if I may be so bold.

  8. There is almost no US coverage of the Yellow Vests who appear to be mostly protesting the economic conditions of the bottom 80% in France. As in the USA, whatever coverage anti-neoliberal movements get is quickly shuffled into the racial or ethnic controversy category. That is where elites on the right and the left prefer to keep the debate. That way, elites on both sides can keep on trucking in groveling immigrant servants who can afford to work for table scraps, undercutting the citizen workforce, due to the pay-per-birth welfare that reduces their monthly expenses.

    • Replies: @utu
  9. wayfarer says:

    Yellow Vests Uprising.

  10. In light of the various crimes and ethnic cleansing engaged in by the Israeli regime, if they succeed in defining anti-zionism as “anti-semitism” according to the traditional meaning of anti Jewish prejudice, then there is the major risk of blowback to the Jewish population, since it carries the risk of all Jews being tarred with the crimes of the Israeli regime. If one uses the phrase “anti-semitism” with a non-traditional but perhaps more accurate definition to mean actions taken against any and all semitic groups rather than the traditional application of the term exclusively to those of the Jewish faith, bearing in mind that those speaking Arabic or Aramaic also can be considered “semitic” then the Israeli state can be described as the world’s leading purveyor of anti-semitism.

  11. Anonymous [AKA "The Lamb"] says:

    Macron, french president and slave of the zionists, exhibited as a trophy at the CRIF annual dinner.

    • Replies: @c matt
  12. renfro says:

    Something people need to keep in mind whenever statistics on Hate Crimes are posted — most of them are crap like that.

    Prepare yourself for more crap on the way. The Jews are mad that not enough hate crimes are happening…er…being reported.
    So the ADL wants Justice to withhold funds from law enforcement agencies that arent reporting enough hate crimes.
    Naturally these agencies will be coming up with more hate crimes so they can get funding.

    ”In 2015, the most current HCSA data available, almost 15,000 law enforcement agencies participated in the HCSA data collection effort – more than ever before. The FBI report documented that hate crimes against African Americans, LGBT community members, Native Americans, Jews, and Muslims all increased in 2015. Indeed, hate crimes against Muslims surged by 67% in 2015. However, the FBI also documented 87 cities over 100,000 in population that either affirmatively reported zero (0) hate crimes or did not participate in the program at all (DNR).1 Accurate, reliable data is essential to build community trust and shape law enforcement tactics and deterrent policies.

    2) To create incentives for participation in the FBI’s HCSA data collection program, certain Department of Justice funds should only be made available to agencies that are demonstrating credible participation in the HCSA program. Whether a specific state or local law enforcement agency is participating in the HCSA program should be included in the rating and scoring criteria as applications for Justice Department funding are considered.

  13. Icy Blast says:

    Does anyone remember the New Zealand-secret agent passport scandal? There was an odd outburst of grave-desecration right after that…

  14. Ilhan Omar, Anti-Semitism, Noahide Laws, & Alex Jones

  15. renfro says:
    @Colin Wright

    This is the most valuable free advice you will ever get on how to handle the anti semite slur.

    If someone calls you a anti Semite….Laugh…..thats right, just laugh at them.

    Don’t act insulted, don’t deny or try to explain yourself, just laugh and shake your head a bit as if hearing something silly,

    • Agree: Vojkan
  16. renfro says:
    @Icy Blast

    Yes I remember that, NZ didnt take kindly to having their passports used by Mossad.
    Do you remember about 4 years ago when Mossad was caught passing themselves off
    as US CIA in the ME?

    • Replies: @utu
    , @jacques sheete
  17. renfro says:
    @Icy Blast

    ‘Mossad agents have been posing as CIA’
    ‘Foreign Policy’ report claims US officials “infuriated” by Mossad operations that “endanger US lives.”

    January 14, 2012 01:44
    Mossad officers have been posing as CIA officials to recruit operatives against Iran’s nuclear program, according to a Foreign Policy report published Friday.

    The operations have infuriated senior US officials, who have since scaled back joint US-Israeli intelligence operations.
    The report cites six US intelligence officers as sources of information – four of whom are retired and two whom are currently serving. Neither the Mossad, the CIA, nor the White House commented on the report.
    The article described how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives by impersonating US CIA agents. The Mossad officers were equipped with US passports and dollars, and recruitment activities occured “under the nose of US intelligence officers,” including in London.

    The Foreign Policy report focused on Jundallah, or Soldiers of God – a Sunni terrorist group based in Pakistan. The organization has admitted to carrying out suicide bombings against Shi’ites, notably in Iran. Israeli officials had been recruiting them to strike against Iran’s nuclear program, an activity which could be ongoing, according to the US intelligence sources.

    News of the “false flag” operations carried out by Israel reached the highest echelons of US government in years past, angering them and causing tension between the two allies. According to the article, former US president George W. Bush “went absolutely ballistic” when he was briefed about one such operation that resulted in the assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist.

    The report claimed that upon entering office, US President Barack Obama “drastically scaled back joint US-Israel intelligence programs targeting Iran,” citing multiple serving and retired officers. Israel regularly proposes joint Israeli-US covert operations against the Iranian nuclear program, including proposals for assassinations, but US officials routinely reject them, it said.

    The article was critical of the Mossad’s methods, calling the organization “brazen” and saying that Israel’s activities “jeopardized the [Bush] administration’s fragile relationship with Pakistan.” It also claimed that the Mossad’s actions “invited attacks in kind on US personnel.”

    Expounding upon the increasing US anger towards Israel, the report cited one intelligence official as saying that “Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us. If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they’re supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don’t think that’s true.”

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @Wade
  18. Actually, the non-souchiens, the non-French-by-blood. Souchien is a term coined by “anti-colonial” Arab-Berber racial activists. It is a homophone for sous-chien, “sub-dog.”

    Might it also have something to do with the common phrase Français de souche – ‘French by descent’?

    • Replies: @Anon
  19. This will soon becoming to America. Orwell looks like a Fairy Tale to what’s happening in the world and in America. The article’s footnote says that the Jews make up only 1 percent of the French population. In America it’s about 2.5 percent or thereabouts. Yet they have control of our governments 24 hours a day. It’s totally amazing that in Britain it’s about Jews, in America it’s about Jews, in France it’s about Jews, and in Canada it’s about Jews. It’s always about Jews, Jews, Jews and Jews.

    Israel can kill, steal, lie and rape every country by their victimization plots and they never answer for anything. When caught it’s always the same and they never are convicted or even charged with anything.

    Can you think of anytime Israel has admitted they have done one thing wrong from spying, bombing, or even killing children? They answer to no one and never will. In the history of civilization I doubt that a small percentage of people have controlled so many and destroyed so much.

  20. Sean says:

    People should generally speculate less about the authenticity of an event (e.g. 9/11, the Reichstag Fire), which is often difficult to prove one way or the other, than on whether the event has been used as a pretext by the ruling elite to do something questionable or disproportionate (often something which it had been hankering to do for a long time)

    That is an excellent point. Unfortunately, all those characters will tell you that it already is beyond any doubt that an event is inauthentic, the disagreement among them is all about what the motive was.

  21. Wally says:
    @Anatoly Karlin


    Anatoly Karlin faithfully believes in the scientifically impossible “holocaust” claims.

  22. apollonian says: • Website
    @Anatoly Karlin

    McDonald Is Extremely Poor, Miserable Analyst Of Ideals

    Karlin should be reminded exactly who/what Kevin McDonald is: he’s gross accommodationist to Israeli terror-state, BEGGING those Zionists and Jews to thereby endorse white nationalism (WN)–not that WN is bad, but McDonald sucks up to criminal murderers, monsters, and psychopaths, Zionists, and Israel advocates (a) in miserable attempt to bolster WN legitimacy, (b) which is betrayal of the ideal of WN, as Zionists and Israel are enemies to all humanity, and McDonald thus wants to enlist WN on side of these criminals murderers, thus obviously degrading WN. McDonald is fundamentally corrupt, and even demented, don’t doubt.

    McDonald thus totally fails to grasp the strength of full-fledged WN which entails that CHRISTIAN component, Christianity properly understood as thoroughly, totally anti-Semitic, Christ standing for TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) against Jew lies and Satanism (JOHN 8:44).

    So one sees McDonald doesn’t fully understand WN, and doesn’t grasp the satanic anti-theses to WN which are Israel, Jews, and Judaism. See also,,, and for best expo on Judaism.

    Don’t doubt or forget the real, fundamental issues involved: TRUTH vs. lies, OBJECTIVE reality vs. subjectivism, and Christ vs. satan–which McDonald wants to compromise and confuse–as McDonald is so putridly compromised and confused himself.

  23. I hope these people protesting the desecration of Jewish graves are also demonstrating against the Israeli murder of Palestinian children if they want to keep their “humanitarian” credentials.

    At least this shows a clearcut social division. While the masses are anti-Zionist the elite is huddling together to show solidarity with Jews and their Israeli masters.

    It is ridiculous. They’re banning Blood and Honour and Combat 18 who have killed axactly how many people in France? They’ll drive some of them to convert to Islam as in the mosques and madrassas they can howl against Jews to their heart’s content and be protected by freedom of religion laws. I don’t think any Imam will kick you out of a mosque or an Islamic school for being an anti-Zionist or anti-Jew. Sounds better than attending government schools if you’re a young anti-Semite.

  24. Willem says:

    That is the idea and it works well at Unz Review.

    What is being done in France is called divide and rule

    Yellow vests is not about anti-semitism, but about inequality, poor working conditions, loss of the welfare state, all issues that should be the main focus of Macron’s government.

    But instead of focusing on those issues, the Macron government focuses on anti-whatever-ism. Works like a charm, just scroll to the comments or see what the author writes above.

    Divide and rule is a very old tactic, and you need to be heavily indoctrinated not to see it the moment they talk about anti-whatever-ism

    PS, Israel is a very large American army base that would not exist if there was no oil in the surrounding neighbourhood. Palestine is what happens when there is no work and play (which makes Johnny a very dull boy).

    • Agree: animalogic
    • Replies: @Willem
    , @Cleburne
    , @Wally
    , @Anon
  25. Willem says:

    Paraphrased, and should be

  26. I think Mr. Durocher doesn’t give Mr. Finkielkraut sufficient credit; his Saturday-morning radio show offers very often a worthwhile discussion of current events or history or literature. But Mr. Durocher is certainly right that the video of Mr. Finkielkraut’s abuse triggered “a veritable pro-Semitic moral panic across the entire politico-media class.” I don’t blame Jews for being appalled when they hear of such abuse. But my sympathy struggles to survive as I see and hear so much discussion and lamentation on the radio and TV about antisemitism. Supposedly the Jews have no particular influence, they’re just like everyone else, but somehow once they’re insulted the president is rushing off to console them and the news shows seem to be talking of nothing else.

    • Replies: @Guillaume Durocher
  27. ingsoc says:

    i fully agree with this article but there’s just a small grammatical fault: it is not antizionism but it is fully anti-nazionism nothing more and nothing less–where reason ends, faith begins.

  28. Funny, the graffiti on the jewish cemetery in Alsatia contains so many errors as to seem inconsistent with the alleged perpetrators’ regionalist values. The spray paint letters on the picture read (in capitals): “ELSASSICHES SCHWARZEN WOLFE,” whereas it ought to read “Elsässische Schwarze Wölfe.” The real name of the group was/is “Schwarze Wölfe,” Black Wolves.

    Especially the erroneous spelling of the adjective “Elsässische” (Alsatian) is seemingly the result of some French speaker ignorant of German, reading from a piece of paper, or having wrongly memorized the text he was ordered to spray. To me it looks like a complete hoax, ordered by some obscure government agency, and carried out by the kind of half-witted idiots usually working for the government, especially in the so-called intelligence or security services.

    • Agree: Mike P
  29. utu says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    There is no anti-neoliberal movement on the right. And practically there is no old left left that would voice the anti-neoliberal message.

  30. Tyrion 2 says:

    Zionism is “ethno-nationalism” in the sense that you might be said to be of an ethny if you’re of partial descent, married in or take on trappings of the culture – in this case, as vetted by religion.

    That is greatly stretching the definition of ethny. Indeed, it stretches it so far that the same thinking may be used to stretch it to include modern day Britain. After all you’re of the ethny that qualifies you for citizenship if you’re of partial descent, married in or pass the citizenship/culture test, as vetted by the theerefore “ethno-nationalist” government. I assume it is the same in France.

    People here will not like the post above because many have some truly weird beliefs as regards how Jews and Israel are in lieu of proper justifications for their worldview. I suspect they’ll find this infuriating…

    But this game of placing a bunch of imagined and wished for values on a foreign country and then trying to use that fiction to justify said values at home is weak. Especially to those who have actually visited that country!

    Israel is a civic nationalist country that takes its civic nationalism seriously – it enforces standards and maintains the law in this respect. France pretends to be a civic nationalist country but fails to enforce decent standards or maintain the law properly.

    Were French citizenship replaced with a requirement to complete a foundation degree in French culture, as marked by a conservative academic, I am sure self-proclaimed French “ethno-nationalists” would prefer it to now but they’d certainly not call it ethno-nationalism.

    This all reminds me of the love-hate relationship many teenage girls often have with celebrities. The girls imagine a bunch of qualities in those celebrities and then pretend that this is justification for whatever behaviour the teenage girl wants to do. Israel, by being in the news a lot – despite being not that special a country, seems to have created a similar effect around itself.

    Finally, the harsh implications of what I have written above do dismiss the validity of the case for “ethno-nationalism” or whatever, instead it dismisses the way it is often being made. The simple fact is that anyone who visits Israel can see very high levels of obvious to the eye racial diversity. They may have some La Raza Cosmica style concept/justification but it is quite bizarre that
    a country where practically everyone I met identified themselves as ethnically mixed (they were young) has now been imagined to be some sort of racial purity state…

    It is actually more bizarre even than saying that the Great Replacement in France isn’t happening, though the passage you shared did not show Finkielkraut actually doing that – he just avoided stumbling through a political tripwire – actually one can naysay the Great Replacement theory because one can plausibly call it the Great Addition instead (realistically it is a bit of both). But to typify Israel as it is typified so often here is to deny what is in front of everyone who visits there’s eyes…

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  31. I trundled down to the local Bricolage this Saturday to pick up some building supplies, and my local Gilets Jaunes were in the rond-point burning wooden shiping pallets (nice new ones, at that … no wonder the capitalists hate them) and stopping cars to hand out leaflets. They were standing right next to a McDonalds, but from what I could see had not yet gotten around to torching the place. To be frank, this is small-town France, the kind of place AntiFa wouldn’t be caught dead in (or maybe they would), so things were rather peaceful, and not a single Gendarme was to be seen. I can’t say I heard or saw any anti-semitic remarks, but Macron knows he has lost the country-side and is now pandering purely to the elites and other denizens of the big cities, aside from the banlieue, where one might find plenty examples from the replacement population.

  32. Benjy says:

    The real reason no one can reveal the true issue that has the Gilet Jaunes protesting week after week is because saying so is illegal. The protesters are protesting Talmudic law, yet if they admit so much this same Talmudic law they are protesting will be used to lock them in a cage indefinitely.

    The jews send out their agents and spies like Finkeilstein to bait and gas-light the French goyim, hoping that someone will slip up and reveal the truth. The jews will then squeal with delight while rubbing their hands together and planning on how to use it to justify their next Holdomor or Palestinian land grab.

    Below is a great AC interview of a Dutch Anarchist who makes that case that the people ordering the Police to fire rubber bullets and tear gas canisters at the heads of the protesters are not French. He makes a very good case that all these Police are taking orders from Jews.

    Willem Felderhof – Life On The Front Line With The Yellow Vests

    Here is his blog.

    Below the more are a list of prominent “French” who Felderhof claims are culpable for ordering the Police and Military to commit violence against the French people.


    The following list is a simple sample and could easily be expanded, especially if other powerful industrialists and influential academics are added. Many sectors of the economy and vital research centres are entirely dominated by Jews, although sometimes, on the surface, non-Jews are still apparently in charge:

    – ABECASSIS, Eliette. Writer. Daughter of Armand ABECASSIS, a specialist in Judaism from a Jewish family in Morocco.

    – ABEHSERA, Charles. Textile industrialist (Morgan) born into a Jewish family in Morocco.

    – ABERGEL, Jacques. “The New Economist”

    – ADDA, Serge. CEO of TV5, Tunisian Jew

    – ADJANI, Isabelle. Kabyle Jewess.

    – ADLER, Alexandre. Journalist and television documentary maker. After having been a communist militant, he became one of the main propagandists of American-Zionist domination. His wife, Blandine KRIEGEL, is a counsellor at the Elysée.

    – AFFLELOU, Alain. Industrial, born into a Jewish family in Morocco.

    – AÏDENBAUM, Pierre. Mayor PS of the 3rd Arrdt of Paris. Socialist billionaire.

    – AJAOUI, Agnes. Actress.

    – ALPHANDERY, Edmond. Former Minister of Economy.

    – AMAR, Paul. Journalist.

    – ANCONINA, Richard. Actor, from a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – ANTHONY, Richard. Singer.

    – ARDITI, Pierre. Actor, born of a Jewish father. Married to the Jewish actress Evelyne BOUIX.

    – ARTHUR (ESSEBAG Jacques, says). The animator was born in Morocco into a Jewish family.

    – ASSAYAS, Olivier. Filmmaker, son of Jacques Rémy. Brother of the actor Michka ASSAYAS.

    – ATTALI, Jacques. Banker and writer, born in Algeria. He is the son of a rich Algiers perfumer who would have liked to be a rabbi. The family moved to France in 1956.

    Jacques Attali became Mitterrand’s special adviser on 11 May 1981, and then the President of the European Development Bank, where his generosity for himself and his friends caused a scandal. He has advocated Jewish financial power and is campaigning for Turkey’s entry into Europe. His brother Bernard Attali was CEO of Air France before joining American companies involved in strategic company acquisitions in France.

    – ATTIAS, Richard. Advertiser and husband of Cécilia CIGANER-ALBENIZ, former wife of Nicolas SARKOZY.

    – AYACHE, Alain. A “people” press boss, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – AYACHE Jennifer. Singer of the Superbus group.

    – AZEMA, Sabine. Actress.

    – AZOULAY, Jean-Luc. A Jew from Algeria. Co-founder with his compatriot Claude BERDA of the AB group, producing films and television animations for young people.

    – BACRI, Jean-Pierre. Actor, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – BADI, Chimene. Singer.

    – BADINTER, Robert. While he was LICRA lawyer against Robert Faurisson, Mitterrand made him his Minister of Justice in 1981. President of the Constitutional Council in 1986. He still sits on the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions and the Unified Jewish Social Fund. His second wife, Elisabeth BADINTER, is the daughter of the billionaire publicist Marcel BLEUSTEIN-BLANCHET (Publicis Groupe SA) and the granddaughter of the communard Edouard VAILLANT (1840-1915).

    – BALASKO, Josiane (BALASCOVIC, known as). Actress and filmmaker, born into a Jewish family from Yugoslavia. Richard BERRI’s sister-in-law and mother of the actress Marilou BERRI.

    – BARBELIVIAN, Didier. Author, composer and performer.

    – BARNEY, Phil. Singer.

    – BARZACH, Michèle. Former Minister of Health of Chirac. Born on July 11, 1943 in Morocco to an Ashkenazi Jewish family, she was compromised in the AIDS-infected blood scandal.

    – BASHUNG, Alain. Author, composer and performer.

    – BAUER, Axel. Author, composer and performer.

    – BEART, Emmanuelle. Actress.

    – BEART, Guy. Author, composer and performer.

    – BECAUD, Gilbert. Singer.

    – BEDIA, Ramzy. Humorist.

    – BEIGBEDER, Frédéric.

    – BEIGBEDER, Charles. His brother, a multimillionaire.

    – BEDOS, Guy. Humorist.

    – YOUN, Michaël (BENAYOUN, says). Television presenter, actor and public entertainer.

    – BENAZERAF, José. Coming from a Jewish family in Morocco, he became the main promoter of pornographic cinema in France.

    – BENGUIGUI, Jean. Actor, from Algeria.

    – BENMAKHLLOUF, Alexandre. Former adviser to Jacques Chirac at the Paris City Hall. Former Chief of Staff of the former Minister of Justice Jacques Toubon.

    – BENYAMIN, Bernard. Journalist.

    – BERDA, Claude. Partner of Jean-Luc AZOULAY (AB Productions).

    – BEREGOVOY Pierre. He was the son of Adrïan BEREGOVOY. Born on 23 December 1925 in Isum (Russia) to a Jewish family from Ukraine.

    – BERRI, Claude (LANGMANN, says). Film actor-producer. Father of the actor-producer Thomas LANGMANN and the actor Julien RASSAM.

    – BERRI, Richard (BENGUIGUI, says). Actor, born into a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – BIRNBAUM, Michel. (New Look, Play Boy)

    – BIRKIN, Jane. Former partner of Serge GAINSBOURG.

    – BLEUSTEIN-BLANCHET, Marcel. Main shareholder of Publicis Groupe SA.

    – BOOBA (Eli YAFFA, says). Rapper born of a black father and a Jewish mother.

    – BORLOO, Jean-Louis. Minister of Jewish origin of Chirac. Married to Béatrice SCHOENBERG (née SZABO), presenter at France 2.

    – BOUBLIL, Max. Humorist.

    – BOUJENAH, Michel. Humorist and actor.

    – BRAUMAN, Rony. One of the founders of Médecins sans Frontières. His stand in favour of the Palestinians has been strongly criticized by other Jews.

    – BRAVO, Christine. Journalist and television presenter.

    – BREDIN, Jean-Denis. Born HIRSCH-BREDIN, who became BREDIN by decree on 16 March 1950, former partner of Robert BADINTER and anti-racist academician.

    – BREITMAN, Zabou. Actress and film director. Daughter of actor-director Jean-Claude DERET.

    – BRUEL, Patrick (born BENGUIGUI). Singer, actor and professional poker player from a Jewish family in Algeria. Has chosen to do his military service in Israel

    – BRUNI, Carla. Ex-model and singer-songwriter.

    – BUFFET, Marie-Georges. Communist Minister of Youth. Her maiden name is KOSELLEK. Its chief of staff is Gilles SMADJA, a communist activist and former head of the society department of the newspaper L’Humanité.

    – CAMBADELIS, Jean-Christophe. Son of a diamond dealer from Greece. Specialist in the fight against the “extreme right”. Member of the PS.

    – CAMUS, Jean-Yves. Goy journalist converted to Judaism and who, in the hope of gaining acceptance, outbid Zionism by showing himself enraged against the “extreme right”.

    – CAPLAN, Jil. Singer.

    – CARLOS (DOLTOVITCH, Jean-Christophe, says). Singer, from a Jewish family from Russia. Her mother was Françoise DOLTO, a psychoanalyst doctor.

    – CASSEL, Vincent. Actor.

    – CASTALDI, Benjamin. Television host (M6). Son of Jean-Pierre CASTALDI.

    – CASTALDI, Jean-Pierre. Actor.

    – CELAN, Paul. Writer.

    – CHABAT, Alain. Actor, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – CHAIN, Emmanuel. Journalist and television presenter.

    – CHARVET, David (GUEZ, says). Actor and singer, from a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – CHATELAIN, Jeremy. “Star Academy.”

    – CHEDID, Louis. Singer.

    – CHEMLA, Elizabeth. Journalist at the Nouvel Observateur and in the Near East Info, from Algeria. She was noticed for her hysterical ultra-Zionism.

    – CHEVENEMENT, Jean-Pierre. Former socialist minister, from a Jewish family from Germany living in Belfort. His wife, the sculptor Nisa GRUNBERG was born in Egypt into a Jewish family.

    – CHOURAQUI, Elie. Filmmaker, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – CIXOUS, Hélène. Academic and feminist activist. His mother was Jewish from Germany and his father was Jewish from Algeria.

    – CLAYDERMAN, Richard. Musician.

    – CLEMENT, Jérôme. (LEHMANN, says). CEO of Arte.

    – CLERC, Julien. Singer.

    – COHEN, David. (Dany BRILLANT, says)

    – COHN-BENDIT, Daniel. Political agitator. A notorious Marxist and paedophile pseudo ecologist.

    – COLLARO, Fabrice. Journalist and brother of Stéphane COLLARO.

    – COLLARO, Stéphane. Former television and radio host and producer.

    – COPÉ, Jean-François (COPELOVICI, says). “I am a non-practicing Jew, but I make sure that I remain, above all, the representative of a secular authority.” (Jewish Tribune, 15.02.2002). Member of the Bilderberg Group in 2003.

    – CORDY, Annie (COREMAN, said). Singer.

    – COUTURE, CharlElie. Author-composer-performer.

    – DAC, Pierre (Isaac ANDRE, says). Humorist and actor.

    – DAENINCKX, Didier. Poor novelist and professional snitch for Mossad. It has been given the codename “the bewildered garbage man”.

    – DAHO, Etienne (DAHAN, said). Singer.

    – DANIEL, Jean (BENSAÏD, says). Essayist and journalist, in charge of the New Observer. He is the 11th and last child of a Jewish family. Confident of François Mitterrand.

    – DARMON, Gérard. Actor, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – DARTY-SEBAOUN, Jessica. Hereditary of the Darty stores.

    – DASSAULT, Serge. Son of Marcel DASSAULT (formerly BLOCH). Multi-card industrial. 3rd fortune in France.

    – DAVE. Singer.

    – DAYAN, Josée. Film director, born in Algeria.

    – DE CAROLIS, Patrick. Former journalist and presenter on France 3. Today President of the France Télévision Group.

    – DE GUNZBURG, Alain. The world’s largest shareholder, son-in-law of billionaire Edgar BRONFMAN, world leader in alcohol and President of the World Jewish Congress).

    – DEBRE, Michel. General de Gaulle’s former Prime Minister (deceased) returned to his Jewish roots at the end of his life. He was grandson of Chief Rabbi Simon DEBRE, originally from Alsace. Among his children, we can mention Jean-Louis DEBRE, President of the National Assembly very close to Chirac and Bernard DEBRE, urologist, former deputy and Minister for Cooperation.

    – DECHAVANNE, Christophe. Television and radio host and producer.

    – DELANOE, Bertrand. Homosexual mayor of Paris. Uses its mandate to promote and subsidize with public money many pro-homosexual associations and initiatives.

    – DERAI, Yves. Programme director of the radio BFM (directed by Alain WEIL), the big business radio station that does not hesitate to invite its listeners to go to the Lutte Ouvrière festival. Former director of the Jewish Tribune (1993-1998).

    – DEREC Jean-Francois (DERECZYNSKI, says) Humorist. Author of the book “The Day I Learned that I Was Jewish”.

    – DERRIDA, Jacques. Writer (deceased in 2004), from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – DESIR, Harlem. First leader of SOS-Racisme, then became a “European” deputy of the Socialist Group. His father is of Martinican origin and his mother is Jewish from Alsace.

    – DISTEL, Sacha. Singer who died in 2004. Born to a Jewish mother.

    – DRAI, Pierre. The former President of the Court of Cassation is also President of the Association of Friends of the University of Jerusalem.

    – DRAY, Julien. Politician born into a Jewish family in Algeria. He was a member of the Revolutionary Communist League until 1982. Having become a professional agitator for the Socialist Party, he was with Harlem DESIR at the origin of the creation of SOS-Racisme.

    – DREYFUS, Tony. Deputy Mayor of the 10th arrondissement of Paris.

    – DRUCKER, Michel. TV host, son of the Romanian-born doctor Abraham DRUCKER and brother of the CEO of the television channel M6. His brother Jean DRUCKER (deceased in 2003) was CEO of television (Société Française de Production, Antenne 2 and then M6). The latter left two daughters, Marie DRUCKER, star presenter at France 3 and Léa DRUCKER, actress.

    – DRUON, Maurice. Permanent Secretary of the Académie Française. Nephew of the writer Joseph KESSEL whose Jewish family is from Lithuania.

    – DURAND, Guillaume. Journalist and television and radio host.

    – DUTEIL, Yves. Author-composer-performer.

    – EL MALEH, Gad. Actor.

    – ELKABBACH, Jean-Pierre. Journalist and former CEO of France Télévision.

    – ELKRIEF, Ruth. Journalist.

    – EMMANUELLI, Henri. Politician, member of the PS.

    – ENDERLIN, Charles.

    – ESSEL, André. Trotskyist activist. Founder of the FNAC with the billionaire freemason Max THERET.

    – ESTIER, Claude. Former President of the Socialist Group in the Senate. Born Claude HASDAY-EZRATTY in a Jewish family in Algeria, he obtained to change his name to ESTIER in 1983. Personal friend of F. Mitterrand.

    – EYZEN John (BENAMOU, Jonathan, says) – Star Ac 4.

    – FABIUS, Laurent. Former Prime Minister and President of the National Socialist Assembly, compromised in the blood scandal contaminated by the AIDS virus. His father, André Fabius, was a wealthy art dealer. Her mother, born STRASBURGER, comes from a family of Jewish jewellers in Frankfurt. He is the main promoter of the 1990 Fabius-Gayssot law which put an end to freedom of expression in France, and then the 1996 law, which introduced denunciation to allow “anti-racist” associations under Jewish domination to impose the terror of a single thought.

    – FARRUGIA, Dominica. Actor and television producer (Canal +, Comedy…).

    – FELDMAN, François. Singer.

    – FERRAT Jean (TENENBAUM, says). Singer and militant communist.

    – FERRO, Marc. Media historian. Jewish by his mother, born Nelly FRIEDMANN.

    – FERRY, Luc. Former Minister of National Education and renowned media essayist.

    – FIELD, Michel. TV host. Former communist leader.

    – FINEL, Lucien. Born FINKELSTEIN. Mayor of the 4th Arrdt. of Paris

    – FINKELKRAUT, Alain. Media essayist and uncompromising Zionist.

    – FITTERMAN, Charles (CHILEK, said). Former Communist minister. Son of Polish Jewish immigrants naturalized on 17.10.1934.

    – FOGIEL, Marc-Olivier. Television presenter.

    – FOLLY, Liane. Humorist.

    – FORRESTER, Viviane. Author of “The Economic Horror”.

    – FOUCAULT, Jean-Pierre. TV host. Declares in his book “The Smile to Tears” that his mother, a Polish Jew, fled National Socialism at the age of 20.

    – FRIEDMANN, Jacques. Inspector General of Finance. He has been Jacques Chirac’s closest confidant for forty years. In 1986, he succeeded in convincing the Prime Minister to renounce the reform of the nationality code designed to curb immigration.

    – FUGAIN, Michel. Author-composer-performer.

    – GAINSBOURG, Charlotte. Daughter of Serge GAINSBOURG, a Jew whose family came from Russia. Wife of actor-director Yvan ATTAL.

    – GAUBERT, Patrick (GAUBERG, says). European Deputy and President of the LICRA, an ultra-Zionist association whose honorary members include Jacques Chirac (and previously François Mitterrand).

    – GEISMAR Alain. Main leader of May 1968 with Daniel COHN-BENDIT, another Jew. Later became Inspector General of National Education. He defines himself as “coming from a family of Alsatian Jews, on both sides, paternal as well as maternal” (Passages, 10.1990). His father, an inspector at the Banque de France, was a permanent member of the Jewish Consistory.

    – GIROUD, Françoise. (Léa Françoise Gourdji, who became Giroud by decree of 12.07.1964). His father Salih Gourdji was from Turkey. Her mother’s name was Elda Farragi. Journalist and minister, born into a Jewish family in Turkey.

    – GLUCKSMANN, André. Extreme left-wing essayist turned rabid Zionist.

    – GLUCKSTEIN, Daniel. General Secretary of the “Workers’ Party” (Trotskyist).

    – GODRECHE, Judith. Comedian.

    – GOLDANEL, Gilles-William. Sulphurous lawyer, president of the France-Israel Association whose motto is: “To his attitude towards Israel, we can judge the spiritual value of a people”. This Zionist association was founded in 1929 under the aegis of the highest authorities of the French State (President of the Republic, President of the Council of Ministers).

    – GOLDMAN, Jean-Jacques. Singer-composer, born of Jewish parents, from Germany for his mother and Poland for his father.

    – GOTAINER, Richard. Singer.

    – GRAY, Félix. Singer.

    – GROSSER, Alfred. University student, born into a Jewish family in Frankfurt. Apologist of National Masoschist Germany for the French public.

    – GUEDJ, Nicole. Lawyer and UMP Minister born in Algeria. Member of CRIF, LICRA and other Jewish community organizations.

    – GUETTA, Bernard. The Express.

    – GUETTA, David. Animator of a nightclub frequented by the “Tout Paris”. Born into a Jewish family from Morocco, he is married to a Senegalese coach.

    – HALIMI, Gisèle. Feminist leader who later became French ambassador to UNESCO. Born on July 27, 1927 in Goulette, Tunisia. Her real name is Zeisa, Giselle, Elise Taieb. She was authorised to change her name by the decree published in the Official Journal of 07.03.1996. His son, Serge Halimi, is an essayist, specialising in criticism of the media and globalisation but carefully avoiding attacking Jewish control.

    – HANIN, Roger (LEVY, says). Actor, born in Algeria. He adopted his mother’s maiden name as his pseudonym. “My real name is LEVY. My father’s name is Joseph LEVY. My mother Victorine Hanin. Originally, it was Ben Hanine. It’s an Azoulay girl. I am 100% kosher genetically. I am the son of a communist and grandson of a rabbi. I feel very Jewish.” (Jewish News, 04.12.1987). Having married film producer Christine Gouze-Renal, his brother-in-law was François Mitterrand.

    – HALPHEN, Eric. Sulphurous magistrate and politician.

    – HALTER, Marek. Jewish novelist from Poland. A tearful song of the centuries-old preservation of the Judeo-Khazar biologic-ethnic identity.

    – HAZAN, Adeline. Former President of the very leftist Magistrates’ Union. Born of an Egyptian Jewish father, she is part of the “first circle” of Jospin, which charged her with the problems of the “City”.

    – HECHTER, Daniel. Couturier and creator of the Paris Saint-Germain.

    – HERZOG, Philippe. He is the son of Eugène HERZOG, a Yugoslav Jewish chemical engineer who immigrated to France in 1927. He was the main economist of the “French” Communist Party.

    – HOLLAND, François. Secretary General of the SP.

    – HOSSEIN, Robert (HOSSEINHOFF, says). Actor and filmmaker.

    – HUSTER, Francis.

    – JACKY (JACUBOWITZ, Jacques, says). “Dorothée Club”.

    – JEAMBAR, Denis. Editorial Director of L’Express. As he explained in the Jewish Tribune (14.03.1996), he comes from a Jewish family in the Comtat Venaissin: “I am of Jewish origin through my mother, although baptized. I feel very attached to Israel.” A former Director General of Europe 1, he has made the fight against the far right one of his priorities.

    – JENNIFER (DADOUCHE-BARTOLI Jenifer Yaël, known as). “Star Academy.”

    – JONASZ, Michel. Author, composer and performer.

    – JOSPIN, Lionel. The former Socialist Prime Minister (former militant and Trotskyist mole) comes from a Protestant family but his two wives, successively Elisabeth DANNENMULLER and Sylvianne AGACINSKI are Jewish and therefore also his three children.

    – JOUFFA, Yves. Former socialist leader. Locked up in the Drancy camp in 1941-42, he became one of its guards’ auxiliaries. To escape deportation, he then joined the UGIF (Jewish pro-Vichy organization) where his father was treasurer. From 1984 to 1991, he was President of the League of Human Rights.

    – JOXE, Pierre. Grandson of the writer Daniel HALEVY and son of the former Gaullist minister Louis JOXE who had converted to Protestantism. Pierre JOXE, a Marxist activist, was registered with the CGT in 1981. Long a socialist minister.

    – KAHN, Jean-François. Journalist born to a Jewish father. Although he declared himself a Catholic and… agnostic, he has always campaigned alongside the Jews. His brother is Axel KAHN, a biologist.

    – KAREL, William. Franco-American documentary filmmaker born in Tunisia. He lived in Israel for about ten years.

    – KARMITZ, Marin. President of the MK2 Group (the first independent French distributor) and president of the Fédération national des distributeurs de films, he was at the forefront of the French boycott of Mel Gibson’s film “La Passion”.

    – KASSOVITZ, Mathieu. Actor and filmmaker. Born into a Jewish family from Hungary.

    – KAZAN, Alexandra. Former television presenter and actress.

    – KEPEL, Gilles. University student, renowned media specialist in Islam.

    – KIEJMAN, Georges. Lawyer, Minister of Justice under Mitterrand, to whom he was very close. Mentioned among the “100 Jews who count” (Passages, 02.1989).

    – KIMBERLAIN, Sandrine. Comedian.

    – KLARSFELD, Serge. Jewish lawyer who became famous as a “Nazi hunter” (in fact, some impotent old men, abandoned by all!).

    – KLARSFELD, Arno. Son of Serge and Beate KLARSFELD. He too is a media lawyer, famous for his arrogance and mediocrity. Has chosen to do his military service in Israel.

    – KNOEBEL, Marc. Former Vice-President of LICRA. A fanatical Zionist activist paid by the Simon Wiesenthal Center (USA), he aims to become a great inquisitor on the Internet, notably through his “I accuse! Seeks to ban all sites critical of Israel and Jews.

    – KONOPNICKI, Guy. Communist activist who later became a rabid Zionist. Born into a family of Jewish immigrants from Poland. A founding member of SOS Racisme, he resigned on 18 January 1991 to protest against the movement’s pacifist positions during the Gulf War. “This time, I say it without shame, I applauded when a flood of fire fell on Iraq.” Support for the Third World comes second to Israel’s interest…

    – KOUCHNER, Bernard. One of the founders of “Médecins sans Frontières”, who later became Minister of the Socialist Government. In 1981, he supported the Jewish Renewal to defeat Valéry Giscard d’Estaing. Appointed administrator of Kosovo by Kofi Annan (UN Secretary-General of Ghana), he has direct responsibility for the expulsion (sometimes accompanied by massacres) of more than 150,000 Serbs from their country of origin. Closely linked to the far left. Married to journalist Christine OCKRENT. Member of the Bilderberg Group in 2005 and 2007.

    – KOXIE (Laure COHEN, known as). Singer.

    – KRASUCKI, Henri (HENOCH, said). He succeeded Georges Séguy as General Secretary of the CGT on June 13, 1982. His mother, Lea KRASUCKI, born in 1903, was a leader of the Polish Communist Party, which was founded in 1920. Was sent to Auschwitz where he is indicated as having been gassed in Serge KLARSFELD’s Memorial of the Deportation of Jews from France as part of convoy No. 55 of 23 June 1943…

    – KRAWCZYK, Gérard. Actor and film director.

    – KRIVINE, Alain. Trotskyist leader, born into a Jewish family from Ukraine.

    – LAFORET, Marie. Actress and singer.

    – LALANNE, Francis. Author-composer and interpreter.

    – LALONDE, Brice. “My mother is of Scottish descent[…] while my father came from a Parisian family, of Alsatian origin, with Jewish roots.” (On the green wave). His grandfather, Roger-Raphaël LEVY, and his father, Alain-Gauthier LEVY, changed their name to LALONDE after the Second World War (decree of 16.02.1950). Her mother, born FORBES, was naturalized French. His cousins include billionaire Malcolm S. FORBES and John Kerry, a US presidential candidate against G.W. Bush. Raised in a bourgeois milieu (big industrial father of textiles), he was for a long time an activist on the far left, notably with the UNEF, of which he was the president.

    – LANG, Jack. Socialist Minister born in the Vosges into a Jewish family. His wife, born BUCZYNSKY, comes from a Jewish family in Poland. He considers himself as “Jewish by sedimentation: my father was a secular Jew, and my wife, of Polish origin, comes from a much more religious background. Our children have received a true Jewish education and have been very active in the Jewish community in Nancy” (Jewish Tribune, 21.01.1983).

    – LANGMANN, Thomas.

    – LANZMANN, Claude. Director of Modern Times (with Jean-Paul SARTRE) and director of Zionist documentary films, including “Shoah”.

    – LAROQUE, Michèle. Humorist.

    – LARUSSO. Singer.

    – LAVILLIERS, Bernard. Author-composer and interpreter.

    – LELOUCH, Claude. Filmmaker, born of a Jewish father from Algeria.

    – LELLOUCHE, Pierre (ALLOUCHE, says). Born on May 3, 1951 in Tunis, “from a traditionalist Jewish family” (Jewish Current Affairs, 01.03.1989). A close advisor to Chirac, he has been President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly since 2004.

    – LEMARQUE, Francis (KOR, Nathan, said). Singer.

    – LENA-KA (COHEN-BOULAKIA, Celine, known as) – Singer.

    – LEPAGE, Corinne. Lawyer, now Minister of the Environment of the Juppé government. She is the daughter of Jacqueline SCHULMAN and Philippe LEVY, authorized to change her name to LEPAGE by decree of 18.02.1950.

    – LEVAÏ, Ivan. Actor.

    – LEVINAS, Emmanuel. Writer and Talmudist thinker.

    – LEVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Anthropologist and member of the Académie française. Long a spokesman for official anti-racism before being overwhelmed by extremist anti-racism to the point of now being accused of racist tendencies….

    – LEVITTE Jean-David. Diplomatic adviser to Jacques Chirac from 1995 to 2000. Since then, he has been France’s representative to the UN.

    – LEVY, Bernard-Henri. A mediocre writer who is considered a “philosopher” by the grace of the Jewish media. Born in Algeria to a Jewish father who became a millionaire thanks in particular to the exploitation of wood in Africa and the Amazon. He is also one of Nicolas SARKOZY’s relatives, after having been close to Mitterrand. He gladly boasts of having contributed a great deal to the imposition of anti-racist terror in France. Her daughter, Justine LEVY, is a novelist.

    – LEVY, Laurent. MRAP lawyer, married to a Muslim woman. In September 2003, her two daughters made the headlines by wearing a veil at school, with her support.

    – LEVY, Maurice. He is the spiritual heir of Marcel BLEUSTEIN-BLANCHET, founder of Publicis, the first advertising agency in France. His family is from Morocco.

    – LEVY, Raymond. Former President of Renault, now Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Lagardère. He maintains privileged relations with Dominique STRAUSS-KAHN.

    – LINDON, Vincent. Actor and film director. Belongs to a Jewish family from Poland (LINDENBAUM) and the Netherlands (Citroën). His uncle, Jerome LINDON was the director of the Editions de Minuit.

    – LIPIETZ, Alain (LIPIEC, says). European Green MEP. From a Jewish family from Poland. His family filed a complaint in 2006 against the SNCF (!) for its alleged role in the deportation of Jews during the Second World War…

    – LUMBROSO, Daniela. Television hostess.

    – LUSTIGER, Aaron (and later Jean-Marie) This cardinal and archbishop of Paris defined himself as “both Jewish and Christian”. And thinking he was funny: “You know, in France there are two great rabbis, a Sephardic, Joseph SITRUK, and an Ashkenazi, me! And finally: “We cannot,[we] must not convert Jews”, “I am a Jew and I will remain one, […]. I know I am Jewish.” (Documentation Catholique, 01.03.1981, n° 1803, p. 139-140). Member of the Académie française.

    – MACIAS, Enrico (Gaston GHRENASSIA, says). Jewish singer from Algeria.

    – MANUKIAN, Hervé.

    – MARCEAU, Marcel (MANGEL, says). Mime actor.

    – MARCUS, Gérard. Rich owner of one of the most important painting galleries in Paris. Member of the RPR Political Bureau since 1985. Chairman of the France-Israel Parliamentary Friendship Group.

    – MAURANE. Singer.

    – MAUROIS, André (HERZOG, Emile Salomon Wilhelm, says). Writer.

    – MAY, Mathilda (HAIM, as it is called). Comedian born of a Jewish father from Turkey.

    – MAZEROLLES, Olivier. Journalist.

    – MELENCHON, Jean-Luc. Former minister and socialist senator. Press officer: Valérie ATLAN, former president of the Union des Etudiants Juifs de France in Montpellier, former head of communication at SOS Racisme. Adviser on the living conditions and environments of students: Eric BENZEKRI, former Trotskyist executive. Technical adviser for social relations: Daniel ASSOULINE, who with his brother David ASSOULINE led the Revolutionary Workers League, a Troskyst chapel.

    – MEZRAI, Raphael. Public entertainer.

    – MEMMI, Albert. Jewish writer from Tunisia. Imposed by the media as a specialist in racism and spokesperson for… anti-colonialism.

    – MILLER, Claude. Film director.

    – MILLER, Gérard. Psychoanalyst and television man, from a Jewish family from Poland. Became mediatically famous for his morgue.

    – MINC, Alain (MINKOVSKI, says). Globalist technocrat close to the socialist party. He is the son of an Ashkenazi Polish dentist, naturalized French in 1947. He holds the strategic position of President of the Société des lecteurs of the newspaper Le Monde.

    – MOATI, Serge. Documentary filmmaker and television host born into a Jewish family from Tunisia. In “La haine antisémite” (1991), he unabashedly displays his hatred towards all those he accuses of anti-Semitism.

    – MOCKY, Jean-Pierre (MOKIEJWSKI, says). Filmmaker, born into a Jewish family from Russia.

    – MOÏSE, Alex. Secretary General of the Zionist Federation and member of the Anti-Racist Citizen Collective. Convicted of “incitement to hatred” after sending himself anti-Semitic threats in order to be able to file a complaint against anti-Semitism. A revealing little “slip-up”, the tip of the iceberg….

    – MOUNTAIN, Gilbert.

    – MORANDINI, Jean-Marc. Journalist and television and radio host.

    – MORIN, Edgar. Sociologist. From a Jewish family in Greece. He has long been an anti-racist activist. From 2003 onwards, however, he was violently attacked by other Jews who accused him of criticizing Israel and then sentenced him for… racism!

    – MOSCOVICI, Pierre. Former Trotskyist militant, later Socialist Minister for European Affairs. Vice-President of the European Parliament.

    – MOUSTAKI, Georges. Singer of Jewish origin born in Egypt.

    – NAKAD, Naïda. Journalist.

    – NATAF, Mallaury. Singer.

    – NEÏERTZ, Patrick. Chief Executive Officer of Christian Dior. Husband of the former Socialist Minister.

    – NEÏERTZ, Véronique. Former socialist minister. Married to Patrick NEÏERTZ, Chief Executive Officer of Christian Dior.

    – BLACK, Michel. Jewish by his mother, Rose DREYER. Former Minister of Chirac and Mayor of Lyon. His political career was then compromised by a case of corruption. He is one of the few French politicians to have been co-opted into the Bilderberg Group, one of the most powerful international globalist associations.

    – NOVEMBER, Tom. Singer and actor.

    – OBISPO, Pascal. Author-composer-performer.

    – OCKRENT, Christine. Journalist.

    – OLIVENNES Denis. Chairman of Canal Plus France (06.2000) after having been its Chief Executive Officer. It was called OLIVENSZTEIN before 1960.

    – OURY, Gerard (TANNENBAUM, Max-Gérard, says). Filmmaker, married to the actress Jacqueline ROMAN, born YACOWLEW. Father of Danièle THOMPSON and grandfather of Christopher THOMPSON.

    – PARIENT, Patrick. Textile industrialist (Naf Naf), from a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – PESCHANSKI, Marc. Member of the political bureau of the Workers’ Struggle (Trotskyist). He is from Moldova.

    – PIETRI, Julie. Singer.

    – POHER, Alain. Former President of the Senate. Gold medal of B’nai B’rith (Hebrew Freemasonry) in 1979.

    – POLAC, Michel. Journalist and television filmmaker, born in Paris (16th century) into a very wealthy family of Polish Jews. He has always been an extreme left-wing activist.

    – POLANSKI, Roman. Filmmaker, Polish Jewish father.

    – POLIAKOV, Leon. Historian of anti-Semitism, fairly forgerious.

    – POLL, Leo (POLNAREFF, Leib, says). Pianist of Edith PIAF.

    – POLNAREFF, Michel. Author-composer-performer. Son of Leib POLNAREFF.

    – PONCELET, Christian. The RPR President of the Senate confided in the Jewish Forum (17.02.1999) to express his concern about “the rise of anti-Semitism in France and Europe”. He said: “I don’t forget that there are KAHN in my family”.

    – PULLICINO, Gérard. Producer and director born into a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – RAYMOND, Levy. Former President of Renault, now Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Lagardère. He maintains privileged relations with Dominique STRAUSS-KAHN.

    – REGINE (ZYLBERBERG-CHOUKROUN, also known as). Singer and cabaret manager.

    – REZA, Yasmina. Writer, born of a Jewish father from Russia and a Hungarian mother.

    – ROBIN, Muriel. Humorist.

    – RODINSON, Maxime. Marxist historian, specialist in Islam.

    – ROTMAN, Patrick. Novelist and documentary filmmaker, professional in the field of permanent incitement to hatred against Germans.

    – ROUSSO, Henri. University student, great anti-revisionist inquisitor in Lyon.

    – ROUSSOS, Demis. Singer.

    – WITHOUT, Veronica. Author-composer-performer.

    – SAPHO (EBGUY, Danielle, known as). Singer.

    – SARKOZY, Nicolas. Jewish by his mother who was born in Greece and Hungarian by his father, from whom he inherited his Catholic baptism. The Jews still consider him one of their own and he is careful not to deny them. His brother, Guillaume SARKOZY was vice-president of MEDEF, the French employers’ union.

    – SARRAUTE, Claude. Journalist, daughter of the novelist Nathalie SARRAUTE (TCHERNIAK, as she is called), from a Jewish family in Russia. “As the years go by, my Jewishness becomes more and more important to me, and yet I have no beliefs, no religious culture. Which doesn’t stop me from wearing a David’s star around my neck.” (Jewish Tribune, 13.01.2000).

    – SCHAPIRA, Pierre. PS Counsellor of Paris and Vice-President of the Economic and Social Council (January 2001).

    – SCHNEIDERMANN, Daniel. Former journalist at Le Monde and presenter on France 5 of the program “Arrêts sur images”. Although he claims above all to decipher the images, on several occasions he was caught in the act of misinformation, particularly when it came to defending Israel or its American instrument.

    – SCHOENBERG, Béatrice (née SZABO). Journalist and television presenter.

    – SCHRAMEK, Olivier. Chief of Staff of Lionel Jospin (1999). “Atheist although of Jewish origin” (VSD, 28.04.1989). He is Abraham SCHRAMEK’s little nephew who was Minister of the Interior of the Left Cartel.

    – SEGUELA, Jacques. Left propaganda advertiser. In particular, he designed Mitterrand’s electoral campaign in 1981, whose television spots included subliminal images.

    – SERVAN-SCHREIBER, Jean-Jacques. Journalist and politician, belonging to a powerful Jewish family in Alsace. Founder of the Express with Françoise GIROUD. Among the influential members of his family are Jean-Louis SERVAN-SCHREIBER, founder of L’Expansion and director of Psychologies magazine, Brigitte GROS, journalist and politician (deceased in 1985) and Christine COLLANGE, journalist.

    – SINCLAIR, Anne (née SCHWARTZ, married LEVAÏ, then STRAUSS-KAHN). Journalist, born in New York in 1948. She is the daughter of Robert SCHWARTZ, a powerful businessman, authorized by decree of August 3, 1949 to take the name “Sinclair”.

    – SITRUK, Joseph. Chief Rabbi of France, born in Algeria. On 13.10.2000, he was caught in the act of public lying by announcing on the radio the murder in Paris of 6 young Jews, in an attempt to divert attention from the Israeli soldier’s murder of a Palestinian child. This confirms the saying: liar like a rabbi!

    – SORMAN, Guy. Journalist and essayist, champion of neo-liberalism. His critical stances towards a certain Jewry have led him to many “misunderstandings”.

    – SOUCHON, Alain. Author-composer-performer.

    – SPIRE, André. Zionist writer and activist.

    – STEHRS, Amanda. Isabelle DARTY’s daughter-in-law (heiress of the Darty family and engaged to Jean SARKOZY), married Patrick BRUEL (BENGUIGUI said) in September 2004.

    – STEINMETZ, Pierre. In 2002, he said: “France is a mixed race country and it will remain so”.

    – STOLERU, Lionel. Former socialist minister. Member of the Bilderberg Group, close to the con man Robert MAXWELL, also Jewish. He is the son of Fernande BLUM and Elie STOLERU, born in Vaslui, Romania.

    – STORA, Benjamin. Writer, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – STRAUSS-KAHN, Dominique. Former Socialist Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry. His father is an Ashkenazi Jew, and his mother, Jacqueline FELLUS, a Jew from Tunisia. His firm in 1997: Head of public companies: Stéphane-Paul FRYDMANN. Head of Political Affairs: Gilles FINCKELSTEIN (also in charge of Lionel Jospin’s arguments unit). Parliamentary attaché: Michèle SABBAN (in charge of Lionel Jospin’s travel).

    – SULITZER, Paul-Loup. Signatory of successful novels written by niggers. Son of Jules SULITZER, a Jewish immigrant from Romania. He found himself involved in several suspicious cases, sanctioned by criminal law.

    – SUSSFELD, Alain. Managing Director of UGC. Close friend of Michel DRUCKER.

    – TAGUIEFF, Pierre-André. Pompous essayist with rather confused works in order to make them look like scientists. Born to a Polish mother and a Jewish father from Russia. This allows him to claim to be non-Jewish, like J.F. KAHN. But by all his commitments, he is entirely at the service of the most radical Zionism, under the pretext of anti-racism, this “form of mental regression” that he himself had denounced. Many of his works, commissioned by Jewish leaders, are in fact collective products. Often unreadable, they are not intended to convince but to intimidate, in order to silence.

    – TALAR, Charles. Producer (music, comedy, etc.), born into a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – TEISSIER, Élizabeth (HANSELMANN, Germaine, dite). Erotic film actress and worldly astrologer (consulted in particular by Mitterrand), born into a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – TIMSIT, Patrick. Filmmaker, actor and public entertainer, from a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – TODD, Emmanuel. Essayist, son of the journalist Olivier TODD, grandson of Paul NIZAN.

    – TRIGANO, Gilbert. Founder of Club Méditerranée. Born into a Jewish family in Algeria.

    – TRISTAN, Anne. Publishing director of “Ras l’Front”, one of the main newspapers that make their money by dragging nationalist militants through the mud. Her real name is Anne ZELANSKY.

    – TRUFFAUT, François. Filmmaker. Born of a Jewish father he would never have known.

    – TUBIANA, Michel. President of the League for Human Rights (2000-2005).

    – STANDBY, Simone. Former UDF Minister and President of the European Assembly. Long considered dead in Auschwitz by Jewish propaganda. Nicknamed: the Aborteuse, which she seems very proud of.

    – VICTOR, Pierre (Benny LEVY, says). Maoist agitator in the 1960s and 1970s, who became Jean-Paul SARTRE’s secretary and converted him more or less to Judaism. Died in 2003 in Israel where he had withdrawn with the fund of the “proletarian” organizations he controlled.

    – VIDAL-NAQUET, Pierre. Mediocre Hellenistic historian, who became a champion of the Jewish inquisition against historical revisionism. He hated Robert Faurisson and would have liked to murder him, but he lacks the courage to act.

    – VILLENEUVE, Charles. Journalist and television presenter.

    – WERTHEIMER, Gérard and Alain. Chanel’s main shareholders. 4th largest fortune in France.

    – WIEVIORKA, Michel. Sociologist, guru of media anti-racism with his wife, salon historian Annette WIEVIORKA. Jews from Poland.

    – WINTER, Ophelia. Singer, apologist of the multiracial society.

    – WOLINSKY, Georges. Cartoonist. His mother, born BEMBARON, was a Tunisian Jew and his father a Polish Jew.

    – WOLKENSTEIN, Pierre. Deputy Director of Crédit Lyonnais, he is the husband of Bertrand POIROT-DELPECH’s daughter.

    – ZARAI, Rika. Singer and mediatized guru of “alternative medicine”.

    – ZARDI, Dominique. Writer and actor, having acted in more than 300 films.

    – ZARKA Pierre. No 2 of the “French” Communist Party. He comes from a family of Jewish origin from Tunisia.

    – ZEITOUN, Ariel. Film producer, born into a Jewish family in Tunisia.

    – ZERAH Dov. Former Chief of Staff of Corinne Lepage. Then became Head of Cabinet to European Commissioner Edith Cresson in Brussels.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
  33. Eolawki says:

    “All in all, these events are illustrative of the French and Franco-Jewish elites manias for anti-Semitism and the growing indifference of the French and Afro-Islamic populations to such theatrics.

    Over exposure leads to indifference. Indifference leads to irritation. Irritation leads to pent-up anger. Pent-up anger leads to inexpressible resentment. Inexpressible resentment leads to hatred.

    The current aggressive behaviour of Jewish populations across the Western world pushing towards laws against even criticising Jews can only push the people of these countries to intense hatred and perhaps even violence or expulsion. The Jewish populations, rather than seeking peace and reconciliation with those in the midst of which they dwell, are instead pushing them through their unending and increasing claims of victimisation to a self-fulfilled prophecy.

    People generally have patience, but only to a point.

    • Agree: Cleburne
  34. Also significant on the French stage of events covered by Guillaume Durocher –

    The recent deplatforming of the quite appealing group of female ‘identitarian’ musicians known as Les Brigandes, their YouTube channel erased for ‘hate’, and the band itself apparently also intimidated into shutting down most of their blog and website for a time

    A few of their vids are still online elsewhere, quite worth a look, and various YouTubers have been reposting their ‘forbidden’ vids

    Les Brigandes are associated with the more elder Le Pen, and with a male artistic director who is in some videos. Les Brigandes actually also represent a group of families which began to live together as a ‘clan’ in a small town in the south of France.

    Tho most videos had French subtitles, here is a great one still online with subtitles in English, referring to the infamous ‘Uncle Ted’

    For those who can follow some French in the subtitles – or just like viewing elegant French young ladies singing – here is their (ironically titled) ‘Dreaming of Zion’ video, the ladies in a classic Citroën 2CV open-top French car … maybe to be deleted soon but quite artistic

  35. The Jews are about to find out that widely disparate groups that are normally at conflict can unify enough to rid themselves of a mutual pest.

    Years ago they allied with Muslims and helped them invade Europe, while at the same time large Jewish populations were ensconced in Muslim societies as traders, bankers, etc. The Turks, Arabs and the like had no love for them, but they were indispensable in some ways.

    The difference?

    1) back then, they weren’t occupying part of the Middle East and shooting pregnant women. They could claim to be nomadic and no threat to Muslim societies. These days, they are clearly a colonial power.

    2) the internet, the growth of education, islamic finance, and the muslim diaspora are reducing a lot of the advantages the Jews had in international trade and banking. They aren’t indispensable any more, in fact anyone who examines the Jewish track record in banking and trading has to conclude that they are major problems for their host societies.

    They seem to be stuck in previous centuries, not realizing that things have changed.

    • Replies: @Jake
  36. smokey says:

    I agree manner of use arbitrary use:??; euphemistic use:”Jew”; descriptive use: pro-,con-; inventive use:hoax; should be distinguished from value: ethnic: value; religious:value; educational:value;political:value; economic: value;

    Very interesting the idea to distinguish. Value <=implies a "scaled placement" made from a range of possiblities: weakly..strongly educated, left or right politician, 10% against abortion, 50% Baptist, 30% Jewish, 30% Black, 100% Catholic, 0% Hindu, 100% atheist from Use <=implies a non determinative, sometimes emotional expression, boundless in meaning. Expressive Use of words can carry a different possibility of meaning by all concerned (meanings are different for every expressor and every member of the audience). .

    transporting by Extrapolation a debate from one society to another will probably expand or limit the meaning of the words and expand the number of works that are used to conduct the debate..?

    Debate is place, culture, time and need restricted.
    the racial/ religious debate
    the Zionism/Capitalism/Socialism debate.
    the Democrap/Reputarat debate
    the Abortion/no Abortion debate
    the Guns/no Guns debate
    the IQ ( I am smarter than you) debate
    the my genes are better than your gene debate
    the my father is better than your father debate.


    Expressions are circumstance of environment induced, emotion modified behaviors produced from a (personal or social) value system: graffiti, murder, telephone call or school yard scuffle .

    Neither Racial nor Islamism are living objects they cannot promote/demote evaluate or grade anything, they are not expressions, but instead are descriptive icons, capable of conveying meaning of sorts. I see nothing in the subject of Islam that is racial and nothing in Racial that is Islam. Racism is a different, very different almost unrelated issue, than religion.. neither should be merged with the other. Constraining Islam to a particular race, or identifying a person or a particular race with Islam, promotes religious hate and promotes racial segregation. Basically it is the union of two groups of hate, which results at their intersection, a construction of intense hate.

  37. Anon71 says:

    As cameras pan across the Yellow Vest protests I take note of the graffiti that appears, and I’ve seen “Cochons de juifs” (Jewish pigs) and “Macron est un enculé pour les juifs” (Macron is a cocksucker for the Jews). I also noted the other week when the Vests were castigating a reporter who was filming them, they were telling him to get lost because “Vous travaillez pour les juifs!” (You work for the Jews!). The writing, as they say, is already on the wall.

    I have no doubt Macron, with his Rothschild association, is seen as the standard bearer for the Jewish elite and one of the instruments the Jews use to keep those “little people” in line. I appreciate Durocher’s article–his points are well taken and I think quite true–yet I can’t help but get the impression the Yellow Vest movement is a people’s insurrection against Jewish tyranny.

    And why not?

    The Jews abolished any remaining freedom of speech the French had (you can even get arrested for wearing a Free Palestine t-shirt), and for the horrific crime of calling Finkielkraut a “Zionist” the Jewish leaders have stepped forward to demand that the Yellow Vest protests be outlawed altogether or subjected to restrictive “permits”. Do I even have to mention the protesters are not happy with seeing their country flooded with Muslims and Africans, or that they are misrepresented by a biased media?

  38. @renfro

    “So the ADL wants Justice to withhold funds from law enforcement agencies that aren’t reporting enough hate crimes.”

    ADL is making a corollary move with this: its efforts to make “Holocaust” education mandatory in the public schools, 19 or 20 states so far. So when the “memory” of “The Holocaust” finally attains a state sanctioned, state-enforced, state-supervised status then, “Holocaust denial” will be criminalized as it is now in Germany, France and elsewhere in Europe. Deborah Lipstadt will preside over a National Tribunal (established by Congress — Marco Rubio leading the charge in the Senate –after vigorous lobbying by AIPAC) that renders its verdicts and orders punishment.


  39. Well, in this case I am openly partial. Being a Croat, I will never forget that Finkielkraut was the only European intellectual who was on our side in 1991., against Serbian “Yugo” aggression- along with a few Austrian & German journalists & Mrs. Thatcher.

    That said, I am aware that Finkielkraut had been changing positions over time (and I disagree with some of them), but the net effect remains: Finkielkraut is, in France, a force for good. For France.

    So is Eric Zemmour, another French Jew.

    On the other hand, Alain Soral is a sociopathic exhibitionist (not that is anything wrong with that), along with his pal Dieudonné M’bala M’bala. I am not a Frenchman, so I won’t pontificate on what’s the best for your country. But, from my outsider’s point of view, I would always choose Finkielkrat & Zemmour over Soral & M’bala.

    That’s said, I am against all speech censorship.

    • Replies: @Toño Bungay
    , @Benjy
    , @Iris
  40. Jake says:

    Jews are more than insane enough to to keep pissing on non-Elite Whitey’s shoes while demanding that the West both do whatever Israel wants in foreign policy and fill itself with millions upon millions of Mohammedans. They do this in part because the Jewish animus to hate the peoples of Christendom is so all powerful that they cannot do anything else. They also do it because they assume they are smart enough to keep that con game going forever with no significant repercussions.

    Jews are arranging a cataclysm for themselves that could reveal Hitler and the Nazis to be preferable because of the short time span and limited geography of Nazi atrocities..

    Because Jews are now, and have been for a very long time, co-partners of the Anglosphere with WASP Elites, the Anglosphere will be severely chastised, shattered into pieces. But the most direct religious products of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism, Zionist Evangelicals, will be happy to die for Jews, and to murder for Jews.

    The Yellow Vests cannot succeed unless the movement becomes specifically pre-Modernist Catholic.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
  41. Bruno says:

    What people are missing here is that Finkielkraut is against identity politics or diversity. He strongly advocate for an assimilation model where the republic doesn’t take into account groups and people can’t have group allegiances outside of nation.

    Many Jews adot this view : Finkielkraut, Zemmour, Elisabeth Levy, Elisabeth Badinter bleustein-blanchet, André Beekoff etc.

    Then you ve got the liberal international Jews like : Alain Minc, Jacques Attali, Bernard Henri Levy, Enthoven etc

    There is not a Jewish position.

    • Replies: @neutral
    , @Anon
  42. Mike P says:

    One tombstone was sprayed with the words: “Elsassisches Schwarzen Wolfe,” meaning “Alsatian Black Wolves”

    It means no such thing. Both the “a” in “Elsassisches” and the “o” in “Wolfe” should have been umlauts, which, while not available on my keyboard, should have posed no difficulty to a spraying can. Moreover, the nominative plural would have been “Elsässische schwarze Wölfe” – note the absence of suffixes in both adjectives; and there is no combination of grammatical case and number for which the phrase, as written, would have been correct. No self-respecting schwarzer Wolf – yes, the singular is without umlaut – would have committed such a goof. This clearly was written by someone unaffiliated with them – if such a group even exists. Therefore, we can call another hoax. This is also supported by the time table – the president apparently was on standby and ready to descend on this tombstone almost immediately.

    The baby-blue color also seems strange, but maybe that is the best they could do on short notice in the way of water-soluble and environmentally friendly paint. It does, however, resemble the Israeli flag.

    PS my wife reminded me of this

    • Replies: @smokey
  43. lavoisier says: • Website

    There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don’t think that’s true.”

    Are any of these important people serving in the United States Congress or the Executive branch of the United States government?

    It sure does not seem like it.

  44. annamaria says:

    The true Jewish values are coming to replace the “unworthy” western values:

    …one of their most influential rabbis, Shmuel Eliyahu, publicly came to the defense of five students accused of murdering Aisha Rabi, a Palestinian mother of eight. Back in October, they stoned her car near Nablus, in the occupied West Bank, forcing her off the road.

    … a video came to light of a talk he gave at the seminary where the five accused studied… Eliyahu not only praised the five as “warriors” but told fellow students that they needed to overthrow the “rotten” secular court system.

    Eliyahu is the son of a former chief rabbi of Israel, Mordechai Eliyahu, and himself sits on the Chief Rabbinical Council… He is also the municipal rabbi of Safed, a city that in Judaism has the equivalent status of Medina in Islam or Bethlehem in Christianity, so his words carry a great deal of weight with Orthodox Jews.

  45. mr meener says:

    the jews are soiling their pants being the French have identified the enemy…jew bankers and media types…. jews pay the white hating communist politicians to unleash the cops onto the public. the jews have ordered Maricon in a round about way to stop the yellow vests same way the Israelis have been shooting the pals by the tens of thousands. no western country can fix itself without naming the evil among them …jews.. bought off politicians and cops being the other two have no power without the cops. In the US the stupid cowardly people WORSHIP Israel and the cops so we are doomed here

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  46. neutral says:

    where the republic doesn’t take into account groups and people can’t have group allegiances outside of nation

    Except of course allegiances to Israel, which Finkielkraut is very clearly doing. Just typical jewish hypocrisy.

  47. Mike P says:
    @Hans Vogel

    I see you made this point before I did – I should have read all the way down first. I agree that this means it was a hoax.

  48. Read the book The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed and The Protocols of Zion to understand the Zionist plan for a Zionist NWO.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  49. @niteranger

    Israel can kill, steal, lie and rape every country by their victimization plots and they never answer for anything. When caught it’s always the same and they never are convicted or even charged with anything … Can you think of anytime Israel has admitted they have done one thing wrong from spying, bombing, or even killing children? They answer to no one and never will.

    It’s uncanny! Just this morning while scanning the headlines, I see this:

    Five children who got longer sentences for throwing stones than Israeli soldier who shot incapacitated Palestinian dead

    An 18-month jail sentence handed down to an Israel Defence Force (IDF) recruit for the killing of a wounded Palestinian has prompted widespread criticism for its apparent leniency in light of the severity of his crime.

    Then 19-year-old medic Elor Azaria was found guilty of manslaughter for fatally shooting 21-year-old Palestinian knife attacker Abdel Fattah al-Sharif in the head after the assailant had already been disarmed and injured in an incident in Hebron last year.

    But on the bright side:

    The ruling was a landmark case insofar as no member of the IDF has been prosecuted for actions carried out in uniform in over 12 years.

    How ’bout them apples!

    • Replies: @annamaria
  50. Anonymous [AKA "Carlos5"] says:

    The french bottled it back in 2017 when voting for macron, over the NF. What gets me less than 2 years have passed and their rioting in the streets.

    What did the french think would happen by voting macron in?

    Macron is a NWO globalist clone weirdo, it couldnt be more obvious if he had flashing red lights and alarm bells.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
  51. @Hans Vogel

    Well, a real Nazi would have used the “ß” as well.

  52. Mulegino1 says:

    One wonders what Charles De Gualle would have done if he had a brief glimpse of contemporary France. I would like to think that he would have thrown in his lot with Petain.

    What, precisely, did the Allies liberate the French people from, other than their lives, their property and their dignity? The heart of Europe would have been infinitely better off under the yoke of German suzerainty as opposed to the straitjacket of Atlanticist-Zionist hegemony.

  53. Real nazis do not commit spelling errors.

    • LOL: Zumbuddi
  54. @Bardon Kaldian

    Well put, Bardon Kaldian. I agree with you about just about everything. But there is one thing that Soral has said that I thought worth considering, that is, that a civil war between Muslims and non-Muslims is not something to be encouraged. But I read his book (Comprendre l’empire) and it was worthless.

  55. Z-man says:

    Macron(i) is a Rothschild butt boy… with mommy issues. LOL

  56. @renfro

    If someone calls you a anti Semite….Laugh…..thats right, just laugh at them.

    Don’t act insulted, don’t deny or try to explain yourself, just laugh and shake your head a bit as if hearing something silly,

    Agree. Every time I try to explain myself, I regret wasting my time. Pearls to swine type of thing…

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  57. @renfro

    I’ve been trying to recall the name of an anti-Zionist from NZ who died “accidentally,” of course, as a result of a fiery high speed car crash several year ago.

    Does anyone else here recall that?

  58. Mike P says:
    @Hans Vogel

    To me it looks like a complete hoax, ordered by some obscure government agency, and carried out by the kind of half-witted idiots usually working for the government, especially in the so-called intelligence or security services.

    It sure does look like a hoax. I’m beginning to think, however, that this spelling error was deliberate – surely the French secret service, and particularly their local people in Alsace, could do better than that. Some of these agents might be unhappy about being pressed into service against their own people, and this grotesque misspelling may have been their way to tip off the public.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  59. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Souche means root in french , so français de souche means with french roots , with french blood , with french ancestors , a real french , not just someone who was born there and was given a french passport .

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  60. Benjy says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Finkielkraut was the only European intellectual who was on our side in 1991., against Serbian “Yugo” aggression”

    I have worked with Croatians on large IT projects. They were always fun and smart.

    That being said, all of them would say how great Yugoslavia was under Tito, just as every Brit I have ever met despised Thatcher.

    Tito was a mass murdering Communist dictator, he was one of the people who should have been tried at Nuremburg. He ethnically cleansed “Yugoslavia” of all the Donau Germans. Not only did Yugoslavians assassinate the Archduke and start WWI, but from its first wretched moment of existence after Versailles, Yugoslavia was created to cause friction between the European states and peoples.

    I was not aware the Finkeilstein protested the break up of Yugoslavia, but the entire action was clearly Zionist. Nato is the Rothschild army, and under dual citizen Wesley Clarke the dirty zionist deed was done.

    I think the artificial construct of a federal Yugoslavia was far better off broken up. When I look across the planet, the governmental model I find best is the Swiss Confederation. It is a confederation of 26 independent Cantons speaking 4 different languages. Some with less than 50,000 citizens. There is no president, the office is filled by a rotating present selected from a pool of 7 diverse members of the upper house. Most major political decisions affecting the nation, like EU membership, are made by referendum. Federal Income Taxes are very low, and all income taxes are collected at the Canton level. Canton tax levels vary widely and there is much tax competition.

    If the jews were exiled from the Balkans, and the peoples there could go their own ways, I don’t understand why there couldn’t be a wonderful country called the Yugoslavian Confederation. Cantons of Slovenia, Trieste, Dubrovnik, Lower Hungarian Danube, who knows how many there would be. All with local tax collection, language, religion, medical care, schools and even militia.

    I think this would also be great for France. One issue that is rarely discussed in this GJ brouhaha is how sick and tired the rural French of arrogant and snotty Parisians. Paris would become a Canton with no more importance than Perpignan.

    This Swiss Confederation model also adapts itself to minorities and religions of blacks or muslims. Each could be given its own Canton(s) with exactly the same rights and sovereignty as the others. If it couldn’t get along with its neighbors, then it could expect walls and road blocks.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  61. Wade says:

    It made me very happy to read that. I’ve been wondering if Israel ever screws things up with our intelligence community. I hope there are more developments on that I have yet to read.

  62. Iris says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    It is indeed very clear from the total lack of insight in your comment that you are not a Frenchman.
    Good day to you.

  63. @Mike P

    You might be right, but I am still afraid you give these people too much credit. Like in the US, education in Western Europe has been deliberately destroyed and redesigned to turn out only half-wits incapable of independent or original thought, or rather unable to think at all.

    During my years as a university history professor, I have seen the level of freshmen deteriorate to the point of the teaching staff each year having to readjust grading standards to yield two thirds of passing students. All this to avoid budget cuts. Even, or should I say especially, university education has become a sad joke. Mind you, this was at a “flagship university” considered the best in the nation.

    Then I discovered that some of the least talented graduates (i.e. the dumbest) joined the intelligence service. Imagine my surprise to see their faces among the audience when I was asked to do a series of lectures on my specialty for intelligence personnel.

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @atlantis_dweller
  64. @Anatoly Karlin

    Agreed – another interesting, first-rate article here by Durocher, and good to see acknowledgement of this coming from a peer in this regard.

  65. @Mulegino1

    Now, how can you be so reliant that Europe would have been better off if World War 2 had been won by its losers?

    Raising the question is a sign of an inner-directed, searching attitude, but being sure about the answer, in my opinion, is not.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  66. Anyone surprised? There are forces that don’t even bother to hide their dirty hand. Shameless and over-confident.

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
  67. Mike P says:
    @Hans Vogel

    Then I discovered that some of the least talented graduates (i.e. the dumbest) joined the intelligence service. Imagine my surprise to see their faces among the audience when I was asked to do a series of lectures on my specialty for intelligence personnel.

    Ouch. Well, on the bright side, this means that the less dumb ones were able to find more respectable employment.

    I am not a historian, but reading about history has always been a bit of a hobby of mine. May I ask what your speciality was?

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  68. @Hans Vogel

    Education (including the academic) may have fallen low as it has without, in my opinion, a malicious plot by the élite behind it.

    We are in democracy, and what the near-totality of “learners” wish is an education system that provides marketable diplomas and degrees, whilst caressing vanity and keeping envy of the better skilled dormant through indiscriminate giving of A rate after A rate to everybody.

    When I was in university, the better liked teachers where those allowing the “learners” to pass the exam investing as little study time as possible and, much more desired a feature, requiring as little actual understanding as possible.
    They wouldn’t be bothered more than just a tad by having to commit to memory two 250-page tomes; on the other hand, they’d perceive as vexatious on them any genuine inquiry seeking to test their understanding.

    We being in a democracy, it’s profitable for who governs to make majorities satisfied, isn’t it?

  69. @Mulegino1

    “What, precisely, did the Allies liberate the French people from, other than their lives, their property and their dignity? The heart of Europe would have been infinitely better off under the yoke of German suzerainty as opposed to the straitjacket of Atlanticist-Zionist hegemony.”

    IOW if only the beast’s deadly head wound hadn’t “healed,” the world would be a much better place today.

    “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast” (Rev 13:3).

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Harold Smith
  70. @AnonFromTN

    Ultimately such “forces” aspire to come completely out of the closet; in fact that’s the end game…the whole point, IMO. After all, what good is it to rule the world if you can’t do it openly and shamelessly?

    Somebody wants evil to openly rule over the whole world, and somebody wants everyone to know that evil has conquered good everywhere.

    “For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

    (14) I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High” (Isaiah 14: 13,14).

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  71. Mulegino1 says:

    How could it possibly have been worse if the National Socialists had prevailed?

  72. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    The jews have a very simple solution to all this anti semitism they imagine and that exists in reality they could assimilate in fact all of the anti semitism revolves around the fact that they have had thousands of years to simply assimilate yet instead decide to remain a fifth column within other peoples nations. even when they marry out they somehow manage to pass on this jew chip on the shoulder to 1/8th jew grandchildren it is the cause of all their troubles and the cause of most of ours.

  73. @Anon

    I know that. What I was wondering was whether it had something to do with the coining of this new word souchiens mentioned by Guillaume.

    • Replies: @Iris
  74. Ben H says:

    “Daniel Cohn-Bendit”

    Anything mentioning this guy should read “self confessed pedophile Daniel Cohn-Bendit” (acknowledged by even wikipedia)

    “Cohn-Bendit published a number of provocative statements regarding “sex with children” in the 1970s and early 1980s, notably in his 1975 book The Great Bazaar (Der grosse Basar) where he describes erotic encounters with five-year-olds in his time as a teacher in an anti-authoritarian kindergarten.”

  75. annamaria says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    The Jewish State’s apoptosis on a go:

    Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked has been using her position to bring more openly nationalistic and religious judges into the legal system, including the Supreme Court. Two of its current 15 judges, Noam Sohlberg and David Mintz, are law-breakers, openly living in West Bank settlements in violation of international law. Several more judges appointed to the bench by Shaked are religious and conservative. …

    Shaked’s colleague, Naftali Bennett, another ideologue of the settlement movement, has been education minister in the Netanyahu government for four years. … After decades of concessions to the rabbis, Israel’s school system is already heavily skewed towards religion. A survey in 2016 showed 51 percent of Jewish pupils attended sex-segregated religious schools, which emphasize Biblical dogma – up from 33 percent only 15 years earlier. This may explain why a recent poll found that 51 percent believe Jews have a divine right to the land of Israel, and slightly more – 56 percent – believe that Jews are a “chosen people”. …

    Conversely, science and maths are increasingly downplayed in the education system, and entirely absent from schools for the ultra-Orthodox. Evolution, for example, has been mostly erased from the syllabus, even in secular schools.

    The sure road to the state-imposed idiocy and self-destruction.

  76. @Harold Smith

    Every religion has its own words about evil. As Douglas Adams (the author of Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy) said, every religion will tell you that murder is sin, and will kill you to prove its point.

    BTW, are you aware that you are quoting Jewish “holy” texts? I think for the occasion you’d want non-Jewish ones.

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
  77. @Mike P

    Yes indeed, there is always a bright side, even to the darkest of things!

    History is a great discipline and open to anyone. It only takes an inquisitive mind, the willingness and courage to question well-established political truth, and stamina.

    My main specialty is Latin American, especially Argentinian, history.

    • Agree: Mike P
    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  78. Wally says:
    @Harold Smith

    So why do you dodge Mulegino’s specific question?

  79. Tyrion 2 says:

    just as every Brit I have ever met despised Thatcher.

    Have you met more than a handful? This Guardian poll, a newspaper that was always very much opposed to her, found that 50% thought she was good for the country and 34% thought she was bad; and bad for the country as a politician is a long way from being personally despicable.

  80. @Hans Vogel

    “We learn from history that we do not learn from history.”
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  81. Tyrion 2 says:

    The good thing about Jean-Marie Le Pen is that he seems fun. In contrast, Alain Soral and Dieudonne come across as very queenie, like Victorian pederasts loitering around the Souk. I intuitively feel that they both don’t like Jews because they think Hollywood made them gay or something.

    It’s an outlandish intuition of mine, sure, but it is funny what one can get about people if you pay attention.

    • Replies: @Iris
  82. Iris says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    The word “Souchien” was coined originally within French association “Les Indigenes de la Republique” whose members, of recent immigrant descent, consider that state-organised discrimination is applied to them.

    The term was made popular by their lady spokesperson, Houria Bouteldja, who demonstrated high debating skills on TV shows (now banned).

    The term however became controversial because when pronounced it does not differentiate from “Sous-Chien” (Under-Dog), which is rightly perceived as offensive by people of older French ancestry.

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  83. @Harold Smith

    I didn’t dodge anything; rather, I gave the only meaningful answer.

  84. Mulegino1 says:

    Hear, hear, Wally!

    They dodge our questions because they think they are smart. They are not.

    To answer my own question:

    France would be far better off if the Germans had prevailed. The country would not be overrun with murdering and raping Somalians. France would still retain its colonial empire, which would no doubt be much improved. France would be for the French, and CRIF and its filthy ilk would not exist as it now does, to undermine France and its native people. By now, there would be no German occupation, as the Germans would have willingly ceded France to the French, and there would be a harmony among the nations of the true Europeans which would have horrified the dirty EU and its Jewish overlords.

  85. @Rational

    They probably have pictures of Macron in ménage à trois with a couple of Africans…

  86. @AnonFromTN

    “Every religion has its own words about evil. As Douglas Adams (the author of Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy) said, every religion will tell you that murder is sin, and will kill you to prove its point.”

    Perhaps, but how many religions predict the future with the same level of detail as the Bible?

    “BTW, are you aware that you are quoting Jewish “holy” texts? I think for the occasion you’d want non-Jewish ones.”

    Please define “Jew.” (BTW 2 + 2 = 4 no matter who says it).

  87. @Anatoly Karlin

    You are indeed so bold! And with a name like Karlin, you’re bound to be more impressed with a Durocher than a McDonald… Anglo-Saxon you’re not!

  88. Iris says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Dissident author Alain Soral is a self-confessed womanizer who had over 2000 girlfriends in his youth, wrote a book and even made a film about it.

    Dissident standing comedian Dieudonne married twice, with the second marriage having lasted 20 years so far, and is father to 9 (nine !!) children.

    The only “gayness” is in your fantasies, Tyrion.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  89. Harbinger says:

    You know, I’m just still trying to let all of this sink in. The Jews are lining themselves up for intense universal hatred when they are actively punishing people for disagreeing in Israeli murder of Palestinian men, women and children.
    Are they mad?
    Can they not understand that this is going to lead to a very probably chaotic future, where attacks on Jews and synagogues will explode?

    This, somewhat, makes me wonder if all this is being done to deliberately create even more universal hatred of Jews, if that’s at all possible, as the first commenter Renoman notes. Either that or the Jews truly do believe they can bring in their world, communist state and start shooting non Jews, because they dare to disagree in their views, beliefs and actions whether at home or abroad.

    It’s really incredibly hard not to loathe Jews. “But it’s not all the Jews, it’s only some Jews……blah….blah…..blah…” is the usual rhetoric we hear. One would think, that with the Jews being such a small population, those in control would be only a fraction and therefore one would expect an overwhelming backlash from ‘ordinary’ Jews and their condemnation of the wholesale slaughter of Palestinians would be prominent.
    It, however, isn’t. In fact we don’t hear a peep from them, well, only a very small minority of Orthodox, anti Israeli Jews in NYC now an again, but as a collective, the majority of Jews remain blissfully silent on any condemnation of Israeli behaviour towards Palestinians.

    This is really only going to go one of two ways – hell on earth for non Jews or hell on earth for the Jews. Either the people are going to wake up and stop the Jews from attaining their world, communist state, or else they’ll just sit back, chase the money, watch their indoctrination on TV and Hollywood and settle into the technological prison that’s being built around them, becoming incredibly more ignorant than they already are, fatter, with a chip in their arm that tells them what to do, what to buy and how to think, as well as switching off their money supply if they disagree with the status quo.

    Absolute madness. Then again, Orwell did mention all of this, but then it wasn’t prophecy, merely putting down in book form what he had been told in his various meetings with NGO’s and globalist bankers. Orwell was not a man of the people. His job was to program society into accepting the future being built for them. You don’t work in the Ministry of Truth, as a propagandist for the BBC, telling lies about Germany and then have an epiphany realizing everything you did in the past was wrong. He was a socialist, ultimately believing in the state authority over the individual.

  90. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Zionist imperialism proves that Immigration = Genocide. Immigration led to wipe-out of American Indians. It led to permanent defeat of browns in ‘Latin America’. It led to natives of Hawaii losing their homeland to whites and Asians. And it’s leading to total eclipse of Palestinians in West Bank by demographic imperialism.
    The only kind of Immigration that is safe for a nation is Replenishment Immigration whereby the newcomers are same or very similar to the existing population. Otherwise, it is Replacement Immigration that replaces one people with another.

    It seems Fatah in West Bank is as useless as GOP in Congress. It is controlled opposition. Totally corrupt and compliant with the Power.

    People like Ann Coulter wonder why America can’t be like Israel in controlling its borders and immigration-policy. They fail to realize that white Americans have more in common with Palestinians in West Bank. Both whites and Palestinians are now under Zionist-imperialist occupation. So, Jewish Caravans can move into West Bank and take over, and brown Caravandals can barge into the US under the political, legal, economic, and ‘moral’ protection of Jewish Power. Jews want more Jews in West Bank to create Greater Israel, and Jews want more non-whites in the US to play divide-and-rule.

    It’s about time people like Ann Coulter stop asking, “How come we can’t have a wall like Israel?” and start asking, “How come we are just like Palestinians in having no effective wall against invasion(and no effective say in immigration policy)?” Walls between Israel and West Bank protects Israel from Palestinians but don’t protect West Bank from caravans of Jewish ‘settlers’.

    Do people like Coulter understand that US had only two elites? Wasps and then Jews.
    It makes sense to bitch and complain about how current US immigration policy goes against what the Founders wanted or how things used to be. The fate of a nation is decided by those with Power Now or Pow-Now. History matters less than the Current Power.
    When Muslims took over Egypt, its pagan past no longer mattered in forging a new order. When Japan lost WWII, its history and ways were swept aside by ‘liberal democratic’ order to serve as puppet of US. It didn’t matter that Palestinians had been in the Holy Land for 2,000 yrs. When Jews took over, they turned it into a Jewish state. As Jews have Pow-Now, they get to decide on policy. Also, they get to rewrite history so that the US was always a Proposition nation.

    Whatever the people in the past believed or wanted, they are dead and no more. Present is controlled by We-The-Living. Sure, people can draw inspiration from the past, but power is about what people do NOW. For example, there is NOTHING in Christian history or theology that blesses homosexuality, but a lot of churches in the NOW have decided to worship the holy homo, and that’s that. The Living decide. It’s like a rich person can leave a will and instructions to his children, but his children decide what to do with them. And even if there are legal clauses that bind the children, they can always find top-notch lawyers to re-interpret the will.

    • Agree: Miro23
  91. Tyrion 2 says:

    Alain Soral wrote a book about how macho he is! Lol. Dieudonne has been trying to prove something with the number of children he can have. Ha.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @annamaria
  92. @AnonFromTN

    Old Hegel was right on many points, and this is one of them. History itself is living proof that we do not learn from it. At least those who make the decisions don’t. As for the rest of us, some of whom might actually learn from history, we watch from the sidelines in amazement as we see the mistakes and failed calculations all those politicians and soldiers are making!

  93. Cleburne says:

    Thanks for the Felderhoff link. I appreciated that there was a discussion of the (((Bolshevik))) slaughter of Orthodox Christians in Russia, a subject regarding which little to nothing at all is known or discussed in the West.

    And we know why, don’t we.

    I do like to think that ultimately, the truth will out, and that all the increasingly frantic muh anti Semitism twaddle does indeed mean that they know that the collapse of the postwar liberal order means no more free lunch paid with the blood of farm boys from Alabama and Texas. It can’t come soon enough.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  94. Anonymous [AKA "chainsaw"] says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    The plan is to force migration on nations in order to make a world where Israel will be only nation left with an ethnic identity. Divide and rule. Israel loves walls, but you won’t hear NancyChuck or ChuckNancy talk about that.

  95. @Mulegino1

    I agree with you; I was pointing out how your observation coincides with Biblical prophecy.

  96. Cleburne says:

    PS, Israel is a very large American army base that would not exist if there was no oil in the surrounding neighbourhood. Palestine is what happens when there is no work and play (which makes Johnny a very dull boy).

    You mean, America is a very large Israeli Defense Force base that exists due to its (rapidly depleting) natural wealth…

  97. Cleburne says:

    The Yellow Vests cannot succeed unless the movement becomes specifically pre-Modernist Catholic.

    OK Jake. Your monomania about the WASPS and Puritans never ceases to amuse, so I’ll bite.

    1. Why?
    2. How?
    3. Western Catholicism, through its heretical insertion of the filioque into the Creed, is directly responsible for the creation of Puritanism in that it crafted a pernicious heresy against which the nous must eventually rebel (even if such leads to even more grevious errors, such as modern worship music and live-streaming sermons on Facebook). Does this mean that the Pope of Rome has been a puppet of the rabbis since 1014?
    4. And does this mean that Henry II of Germany was also in on the scam?

    All the best, PC.

    • Replies: @Jake
  98. Durocher observes that “Jewish organizations and the French government are moving to outright criminalize opposition to Jewish ethno-nationalism (the definition of Zionism) all the while criminalizing all Western ethno-nationalisms as being discriminatory, hateful, xenophobic, etc.”

    These criminally-enforced, in-your-face double-standards involving race, identity, and nationalism remain daunting obstacles for faux-humanitarians of the Zionist persuasion.

    How to square the hole?

    Whereas Jewish nationalism (Zionism) has become a sacred and untouchable ‘democratic value’ in the West, there’s a glaring and unmistakable inconsistency inside this brave new kosher paradigm.

    Ethnic nationalism no longer applies to White people in historically White countries.


    That’s right, In the West (where White people have existed in White-created civilizations) ‘race’ no longer exits. And thinking that way makes you… a racist.

    The whole concept of ‘race’ may well have been a white supremacist conspiracy from the very beginning!

    Racial categories (and ‘whiteness’) are therefore in the process of being deconstructed by Zionist-friendly experts who know far more than you or I.


    Many are from Harvard, Brandeis and Yale!

    So don’t believe your lying eyes.

    Apparently, whole ‘race thing’ was all made up by icky white supremacists like Adolf Hitler, Charles Darwin, Albert Schweitzer, and David Livingstone. And the list goes on and on!

    Plato, Newton, Goethe, Shakespeare and Jefferson are now Kanye, Snoop, Maxine and Ocasio. Get used to it! (Israel however must remain forever The Jewish State for just the Jewish People which is entirely reasonable.)

    And if you don’t believe that the concept of race is a fiction, I can get you thousands of Jewish scientists, philosophers, lawmakers, script supervisors, and executive producers who will happily explain to you why you’re wrong about yourself, your non-existent people, and your racially-exclusive racist history!

    Just turn on your TV for goodness sake.

    Yes, I concede that there’s ‘reactionary’ push-back from ‘white supremacists’. (This always happens.) I believe you can find out more about these ‘racists’ under the category of ‘virulent’. (Check with Google!)

    The Solution?

    Crack down. Hard.

    This will require a mixed regimen of coercion, bullying, heightened penalties, political pressures, public shaming, selective censorship, and re-education–along with the possibility of arrest and incarceration. (Check with your local ADL representative for more information.)

    Hard problems require damn hard solutions. (Just consider the ‘virulent’ problem of Palestinian terrorism and Palestinian antisemitism, for example.)

    Therefore, enforced multi-cultural integration is being racheted-up throughout the democratic West (with one glorious exception).

    Speech crimes are no longer fiction. It’s the law!

    So pipe down or go to jail.

    Night-y night, children.

    • Agree: Cleburne
  99. skedaddle says:

    I think the Yellow Vests need to change to burkas and carry on their crusade. Burkas and hijabs seem to shut everyone up.

    • Agree: The Alarmist
  100. Organized and Globalized Jewry has been pushing mass immigration for a hundred years or more for European Christian nations.

    Globalized Jewry has pushed mass immigration in order to attack and destroy European Christian nations.

    Globalized Jewry has pushed mass immigration in the USA, France, England, Germany, Italy, Australia, Canada and other European Christian nations.

    Globalized Jewry is using mass immigration as a demographic weapon to attack and destroy European Christian nations.

    Globalized Jewry agents in the United States — including President Trump, Hillary Clinton, George W Bush and Nancy Pelosi — all push nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    The Jews in Israel, however, do not want to be swamped and replaced in Israel by non-Jew foreigners, so they deport illegal alien infiltrators and have strict rules for immigrating to Israel.

    It is time to ignore the Organized and Globalized Jews who scream for mass immigration for European Christian nations.

    Expulsions from all European Christian nations must be used to stop the Organized and Globalized Jews if they persist in pushing nation-wrecking mass immigration.

    Israel must be used as a mass repository for all the Jews that are expelled from European Christian nations.




    Is it good for Jews to push mass immigration?

    Is it time to send Jews who push mass immigration to Israel?

    Tweets from 2015:

  101. Incitatus says:

    “What, precisely, did the Allies liberate the French people from, other than their lives, their property and their dignity?”

    For starters Nazi Germany’s bill of 400 million francs/day for occupation (146 billion francs/year = 7.3 billion RM/year). It overvaluing the mark by 60%. A sum six times actual cost, sufficient for an 18-million-man army (100,000 German troops actually secured the occupied zone Dec 1941). In addition, Germany seized 154 billion francs in ‘expropriation’ commodities, supplies, military equipment, and rolling stock 1940-41. Naturally artwork, antiques, and furniture were also ‘liberated’.

    Occupation rationing limited French daily consumption to 1180 calories per person (vs. 2700-4650/day Germany, 2269/day Italy, 1800/day Netherlands). Necessary, given German seizure of 80% French foodstuff production. As well as exported slave labor. French production dropped 50% due to lack of fuel, fertilizer, and workers.

    90,000 French soldiers were kia, 200,000 wia in 1940. 650,000 French civilians were forced to labor in Germany in the Service du Travail Obligatoire. 1,500,000 French POWs were imprisoned (hostages) in Germany 1940-45. 350,000 French civilians died from malnutrition, exposure, reprisals, crimes-against-humanity.

    Still, France was lucky. Reichminister Herbert Backe’s Hunger Plan (adopted 2 May ’41) breathlessly anticipated 20-30 million deaths by hunger am Ost post Barbarossa. Food was another weapon in the Nazi arsenal. Low-cost genocide, nature’s non-nutritional land-clearing. Who can blame them? 800,000 ordinary Germans starved in WW1. Nitwits Willie II, Ludendorff and Hindenburg forgot secure supplies in their supreme war plan. They blamed failure on the Home Front, Freemasons, and (of course) Jews. Twenty years later, why not inflict lessons learned in criminal stupidity on conquered populations?

    Interesting tidbit. Winter 1941-42, Barbarossa stalled, leading to a November crisis. Wasn’t just missing wintermantel. The Wehrmacht was to live off conquered land and (in addition) export a quota to the Vaterland. The worst threat to the Nazi régime was domestic civilian shortages. Everything was done to make ordinary Germans well-fed and comfortable while out-of-sight subjects starved-to-death. Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Führer!

    Greeks were allowed 930 calories per day ‘41-42. 40,000 starved to death Athens-Piraeus by spring 1942. Brits stepped in with Canadian grain sent via the Red Cross. Imagine that! Supplying your incompetent/genocidal enemy’s occupation!

    “I would like to think that he [Charles de Gaulle] would have thrown in his lot with Petain.”

    Big surprise! Doubtless you’d ‘like to think’ Eva un-poisoned and Adolf’s brains unblown over the bunker ceiling?

    Dream on.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
    , @Mulegino1
    , @Art
  102. Definition of Zionist :

    “A race supremacist, colonialist, extremist. One who believes in a political ideology that hijacked judaism, soon to hijack Christianity.

    ‘Many zionists don’t believe in god but believe god gave them Israel’ – Ilan Pappe

    Zionism was founded by atheistic jews in 1897, an ideology originally supported by the antisemitic British government of the early 1900’s who wanted to push European jews out of the UK and Europe and send them to the middle east. Of course many European jews were against being sent to the middle east and saw zionism as an antisemitic movement.

    After the 6 day war was won, more and more jews realised there was a good chance of having their own state and zionism became entwined with jewish nationalism.

    Still to this day there are many jews that are anti-zionist and consider Europe or another country as their home land, not the middle east. There are less and less younger jewish zionists as they realise the connection between zionism and the occupation, genocide and apartheid of the indigenous population of Israel (Palestinians).

    Unfortunately there is a growing number of Christian zionists who are antisemitic and want to take over Israel. They believe the messiah will wipe out 2/3’rds of the jewish population and the remainder will have to convert to Christianity if they want to go to heaven during the rapture; if they don’t they will go to hell.
    Many jews are not zionists, there are also Christian zionists.”

  103. annamaria says:

    “…the majority of Jews remain blissfully silent on any condemnation of Israeli behaviour towards Palestinians.”
    — This heartless and immoral consent makes the strongest — and the loudest — argument against holohoax. The whole holo-biz is based on the meme of “superior morality and incomparable sufferings.” The naked holo-tribe has nothing to cover its ugly nakedness. Unredeemable. Unforgivable.

  104. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Tyrion 2, what exactly are you trying to prove on this forum? This is for you to ponder, Tyrion 2:

  105. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    For Tyrion 2: Comment section:

    [The Jewish State] has been a racist (truly anti-semitic, in that Palestinians are semites) endeavor from the moment zionists set foot on Palestinian land determined (as they were from the get go – Ilan Pappe makes that abundantly clear) to “rid” it of its indigenous inhabitants. For a brief while Ben-Gurion toyed with the idea (almost certainly the truth) that the Palestinians were indeed the descendants of the original Jewish inhabitants (who had back those millenia ago themselves displaced many, though not all, of the even earlier inhabitants). But the 1936 Palestinian resistance to zionist encroachment soured him of this.

  106. Alden says:
    @Icy Blast

    I can always tell when the AIPAC, Friends of IDF, Israel Bonds fundraisers are coming to town.

    About 6 weeks before begins a rush of anti Semitic graffiti and cemetery desecration’s Mass hysteria in the press and the money rolls in.

  107. Alden says:

    I just say So? Shrug, upturned palms.

  108. Art says:

    In Face of Yellow-Vest Critics, France Moves to Criminalize Anti-Zionism

    What accurate descriptive word is next, what are the Jew going to outlaw and criminalize after “Zionism” – Talmud?

    Hmm- say “Talmud” and go to jail!

    There is no end to the Jew disservice to Christian Western idealism.

    It is obvious, it is a fact that Western freedom and democracy cannot co-exist with Jews.

    Think Peace — Art

  109. Jake says:

    You are correct. When Whitey loses the ability, or the desire, to protect Jews from Mohammedans, Jews will not be able to snuggle up to the Mohammedans once again. The nation of Israel ended that possibility.

    Of course, Israel has about 100 nukes, and the Israelis are insane enough to blow up the planet rather than pay for a single sin.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  110. Wally says:

    “Israel is a very large American army base that would not exist if there was no oil in the surrounding neighbourhood.”

    Except the US is now the #1 producer of oil and the world is awash in it. Your point makes no sense.

    It’s not about oil, it’s about the US Congress subservience to Jew special interests and Jews “shitty little country”.

    The oil canard is something hasbarists have been pushing for decades, you have taken the bait, or you are a hasbarist at work.

    • Agree: Cleburne
    • Replies: @Alden
    , @mark green
    , @c matt
  111. Benjy says:

    “I do like to think that ultimately, the truth will out”

    One of Felderhoff’s messages is that we can not allow ourselves to be defeated by fear and rumors of war. This is why the jew continually gas-lights us. Felderhoff worked in Hospice and said that the death of a person, and a race, is another just transition so we should not fear it. But that does not mean that we should accept what the jews are doing.

    In this light, the GJ movement is really a ray of sunshine breaking through the jew chem-fog. I find it uplifting. I go to Ian56 every weekend and watch the protests. It’s like a whiff of Napalm in the morning. The goyim are waking up and the chosenites are getting desperate. Look at Macron’s next escalation into despotism:

    The French President brought the online censorship idea up at the annual dinner of the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France, stating that a new way to tackle online hate speech should be tabled for May.

  112. anon[681] • Disclaimer says:

    Macron is the modern day Marie Antoinette. “Let them eat cake!” he says upon hearing the plight of the yellow vests, while he spends $10,000 a month on his makeup.

    Marie Antoinette was accused of being too sympathetic to France’s enemies, esp. her native Austria, which by then was already under the control of Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Sound familiar? Why does this shit keep happening to France? 230 years later the French are in need of yet another revolution to toss out yet another Rothschild puppet.

    • Replies: @Jake
  113. Wally says:

    – IOW, France lost it’s war of aggression with Germany.
    So of course Germany seized military equipment, that’s what always happens n war. LOL
    -You have no proof your laughable claim about stolen artwork, see: Taskforce: only 5 of 1,500 artworks were ‘looted’:
    – Nor do have proof for your Zionist nonsense concerning alleged “seizure” of France’s economy, nor can / have you produced any. Just what the Germans would have wanted, another country to support. LOL
    – Your caloric intake silliness is laughable and visibly, observably, was not the case, see below.

    – We also note that your still arguing WWI. LOL
    – Your ‘hunger plan’: “Everything was done to make ordinary Germans well-fed and comfortable while out-of-sight subjects starved-to-death”: is purely made up, it too is hilariously desperate.
    Anyway, you’ve made a clown of yourself again and merely repeated what has already refuted in spades. I remind everyone, Zionist Incitatus was quite demolished by me in the comments here:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz:

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  114. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:

    The french suffered under the nazis the same sufferings they had caused to the rest of Europe
    with the Napoleonic invasions . The french napoleonic wars produced about 12 million dead in Europe . The french invaded from Cadiz to Moscow . the french armies , like the nazi armies , lived on the territories they occuped , stole food and everything of value , killed civilians , destroyed churches , art , archives ….

    In Spain ( 12 million inhabitants at the time ) the french invaders killed about 500.000 people , half of them civilians , and the french armies lost about 300.000 soldiers . The french napoleonic invasion of Spain produced the collapse of Spain and the disorderly collapse of the spanish Empire in America . Afterwards France invaded Mexico and Argentina . The english also invaded Argentina . The yankees invaded from California to Texas , and as everybody knows have given counteless coups in what they call their ” back yard ” , and just now are trying to invade Venezuela .

    • Agree: Guillaume Durocher
    • Troll: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @Alden
  115. smokey says:
    @Mike P

    @ mike P. “we can call another hoax.” <= finally starting to identify a possible hoax right up front!

    Place the burden of proof on the challenged hoaxer.. must prove first authenticity … should be a requirement of the website to be allowed to publish challenged material unless and until those who are the commentators accept the proof that the subject is genuine, the claims of the presenter have verifiable references and the arguments that constitute the presentation are verifiable in fact or that the claims that cannot be supported by reference or fact are identified as un supportable claims or opinion of the commentary.

    Thank you Mike P.

  116. Jake says:

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. The culture it produced, WASP, will always produce philoSemitism. It always will wage war against historic Christianity and the peoples seen as belonging in some form to historic Christianity. It is joined at the hip with Jews: Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    The filioque was not a novel idea in the 11th and 12th centuries. It had a very long history among the fiathful, and it is fully in keeping with historic Christology, including the eternal power of the Second Person of the Trinity. No Rabbis care for that – that’s the kind of thing they see the way Dracula sees a crucifix. The filioque was added to the Creed for the same reason that other things in accordance with the development of doctrine have been affirmed when they have: to combat heresy by making things more concrete and clear.

    It is worse than absurd to suggest that the filioque had anything to do with causing the Puritans to be the murderous Judaizers they were.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
  117. Jake says:

    The shit keeps happening to France because of the French Revolution. If France does not repent of the Revolution and strive to become once again Eldest Daughter of the Church, France will die an ignominious suicide, her remains picked over by Freemasons, Jews, Mohammedans, and Anglo-Zionists.

    • Replies: @Alden
  118. Jake says:

    DeGaulle recognized the threats to France and the rest of Europe from the Anglo-American alliance. And that was before the American WASP Elites embraced hordes of Soviet Jewish Trotskyites to the inner sanctum of WASP/Anglo-Zionist power.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  119. Alden says:

    The oil thing is ridiculous. Producers have to sell it. Consumers have to buy it.

    Regular commerce is so much better for both sides than warfare.

  120. Alden says:

    Be that as it may, don’t forget that 2,200 years ago the evil Romans invaded both Spain and France and even enslaved hundreds of thousands.

  121. Cleburne says:

    Jake, believe me when I say I share your disdain for the WASPs even though I think you’re wrong on your theology (eg, “judaizing”). But we’ve discussed this before.

    That said, don’t you think it’s the case that the WASPs of Yankeedom are a fairly (and mercifully) small and unique population? The Puritanism of the lot that ended in the Bay Colony was narrow and restrictive within England itself – a far cry from the gentry Puritanism of, say, Hampden, Lord Say, Lord Brooke, and your favorite demon Cromwell (it’s OK to have such a demon; mine is Lincoln). Within the context of the “new world,” it became even more so, and when that angry, intolerant spirit lost any sense of divinity and stumbled across Hegel, then the game was up. It was a Unitarian who came up with the tikkun olanist nonsense about the “arc of history bending toward justice” and sought to help it along through schemes like abolitionism, pounding the pulpit for U.S. entry into World War I, and so on.

  122. Alden says:

    Interesting news from England. Jeremy Corbin has proposed stripping English citizenship from English citizens who join the Israel Defense Force.

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Tyrion 2
  123. Alden says:

    I think Armenia is eldest daughter of the church

  124. renfro says:

    Either that or the Jews truly do believe they can bring in their world

    They do believe it. At least the Uber Jew leaders believe it because, to keep it simple to understand,……they are a Cult.
    Zionism is a Cult. Judaism to a degree is a Cult due to its paranoid extremism and illusions of chooseness /grandeur, more so than Christian religions although some of those also are also cultish as we see in Christian Zionist doomday cult.

    Identifying Characteristics of a Cult

    1). Deception. Destructive cults are presented externally as traditional associations. These can be arbitrarily defined by their instigators as almost any banal group (‘religious’, ‘cultural’, ‘political’, ‘commercial’, etc. etc.). However, internally, they are always totalitarian (i.e. they are centrally-controlled and require of their adherents an absolute subservience to the group and its patriarchal, and/or matriarchal, leadership above all other persons). By their very nature, destructive cults never present themselves in their true colours. Consequently, no one ever becomes involved with one as a result of their fully-informed consent.

    2). Self-appointed sovereign leadership. Destructive cults are instigated and ruled by psychologically dominant individuals, and/or bodies of psychologically dominant individuals, often with impressive, made-up names, and/or ranks, and/or titles. They steadfastly pretend moral and intellectual authority whilst pursuing various, hidden, criminal objectives (fraudulent, and/or sexual and/or violent, etc.). The leaders of destructive cults hold themselves accountable to no one.

    3). Manipulation. Destructive cults employ coordinated techniques of social and psychological persuasion (variously described as: ‘mental manipulation’, ‘coercive behaviour modification’, ‘group pressure’, ‘thought reform’, ‘ego destruction’, ‘mind control’, ‘brainwashing’, etc.). These are designed to fulfil the hidden criminal objectives of the leaders by provoking in the adherents an infantile total dependence on the group, to the detriment of themselves and of their existing family, and/or other, relationships. Destructive cults manipulate their adherents’ existing beliefs and instinctual desires, creating the illusion that they are exercising free will.

    4). Destructive cults can be of any size, duration and level of criminality. They comprise groups, and/or sub-groups, of previously diverse individuals bonded by their unconscious acceptance of the self-gratifying, but wholly imaginary, scenario that they alone represent a positive or protective force of purity and absolute righteousness derived from their leadership’s exclusive access to a superior or superhuman knowledge, and that they alone oppose a negative or adversarial force of impurity and absolute evil. Whilst this two-dimensional, or dualistic*, narrative remains the adherents’ model of reality, they are, in effect, constrained to modify their individual personalities and behaviour accordingly.

    5). Pseudo-scientific mystification. The instigators of destructive cults seek to overwhelm their adherents emotionally and intellectually by pretending that progressive initiation into their own superior or superhuman knowledge (coupled with total belief in its authenticity and unconditional deference to the authority of its higher initiates) will defeat a negative or adversarial force of impurity and absolute evil, and lead to future, exclusive redemption in some form of secure Utopian existence. Cultic pseudo-science is always essentially the same hypnotic hocus-pocus, but it can be peddled in an infinite variety of forms and combinations

    6). Monopoly of information. The leaders of destructive cults seek to control all information entering not only their adherents’ minds, but also that entering the minds of casual observers. This is achieved by constantly denigrating all external sources of information whilst constantly repeating the group’s reality-inverting key words and images, and/or by the physical isolation of adherents. Cults leaders systematically categorize, condemn and exclude as unenlightened, negative, impure and absolutely evil all free-thinking individuals and any quantifiable evidence challenging the authenticity of their imaginary scenarios of control. In this way, the minds of cult adherents can become converted to accept only what their leadership arbitrarily sanctions as enlightened, positive, pure and absolutely righteous. Consequently, adherents habitually communicate amongst themselves using their group’s reality-inverting jargon, and they find it difficult, if not impossible, to communicate with negative persons outside of their group.

    7). False justification. In destructive cults, a core-group of adherents can be gradually dissociated from external reality and reformed into deployable agents, and/or de facto slaves, and/or expendable combatants, etc, furthering the hidden criminal objectives of their leaders, completely dependent on a collective paranoid delusion of absolute moral and intellectual supremacy fundamental to the maintenance of their individual self-esteem and related psychological function. It becomes impossible for such fanatics to empathise with non-adherents. Their minds are programmed to see the manipulation, and/or cheating, and/or dispossession, and/or destruction, of inferior outsiders (particularly, those who challenge their group’s controlling scenario) as perfectly justifiable.

    8). Structural mystification. The instigators of destructive cults can continue to organize the creation, and/or dissolution, and/or subversion, of further (apparently independent) corporate structures pursuing lawful, and/or unlawful, activities in order to prevent, and/or divert, investigation and isolate themselves from liability. In this way, some cults survive all low-level challenges and spread like cancers destroying the lives of countless individuals in the process. At the same time, their leaders acquire absolute control over capital sums which place them alongside the most notorious racketeers in history. They operate behind ever-expanding, and changing, fronts of ‘privately-controlled, limited-liability, commercial companies’, and/or ‘non-profit-making associations’, etc. etc.

    9). Chronic psychological deterioration symptoms. The long-term core-adherents of destructive cults are psychotic (i.e. suffering from psychosis, a severe mental derangement, especially when resulting in delusions and loss of contact with external reality). Core-adherents who manage to break with their group and confront the ego-destroying reality that they’ve been systematically deceived and exploited, are invariably destitute and dissociated from all their previous social contacts.

    10). Repression of all dissent. The leaders of the most-dangerous destructive cults are megalomaniacal psychopaths (i.e. suffering from a chronic mental disorder, especially when resulting in paranoid delusions of grandeur and self-righteousness, and the compulsion to pursue grandiose objectives). The unconditional deference of their deluded adherents only serves to confirm, and magnify, the leaders’ own delusions. This type of destructive cult leader maintains an absolute monopoly of information whilst perpetrating, and/or directing, evermore heinous crimes. They sustain their activities by the imposition of arbitrary codes (secrecy, justice, punishment, etc.) within their groups, and by the use of humiliation, and/or intimidation, and/or calumny, and/or malicious prosecution (where they pose as victims), and/or sophism, and/or the infiltration of traditional culture, and/or corruption, and/or intelligence gathering and blackmail, and/or extortion, and/or physical isolation, and/or violence, and/or assassination, etc. etc., to repress any internal or external dissent.

    • Agree: Gg Mo
    • Replies: @Harbinger
  125. Mulegino1 says:

    You’re forgetting that France declared war on Germany, not the other way around.

    Also the western Allies were responsible for more French civilian deaths- and real atrocities- than the Germans were.

    With respect to the diets of the “occupied” countries, don’t even go there, as it will lead inexorably to the mass murder of German “disarmed enemy forces” in Eisenhower’s starvation camps and the deliberate efforts to starve the German people after the war.

    The so called “liberators” were far more destructive, homicidal and malign than the German National Socialists.

    • Agree: Mike P, apollonian
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Incitatus
  126. @Icy Blast

    I live in a city with a sizable Jewish population. Secular cemeteries, including the one my family is in, and Catholic cemeteries are vandalized by toppling headstone every bit as often as Jewish cemeteries. The difference is that the vandalism of goyim graves is never newsworthy. “Hate crimes” only exist for the tribe.

    • Replies: @republic
  127. anarchyst says:

    If a nuclear device is “lit off” in an American or European city, it will have Israel’s fingerprints all over it. Israel is desperate to keep the American money spigot running, as well as sabotaging the Palestinian “peace process” that the world wants it to take seriously.


    In fact, if a nuclear device is “lit off” anywhere in the world, it will have come from Israel’s secret nuclear “stockpile”.

    The “power outage” in Atlanta was a convenient excuse for Israel to perform a logistical “sleight of hand”, as an Israeli plane was allowed to land and take off during the “power outage” without receiving customs clearance or inspection. This is one of many Israeli companies that possesses a “special exemption” granted by the U S government that frees it from customs inspections. Just maybe another one of Israel’s nukes was just being pre-positioned or nuclear triggers (tritium) were being renewed, getting ready for “the big one”. As most Americans are tired of all of the foreign wars being fought for Israel’s benefit, another “incident” on American soil would be enough to galvanize the American public, once again, (just like WTC 9-11) to support another war for Israel’s benefit. Israel’s “samson option” is a real threat to “light one off” in a European or American city, if Israel’s interests are not taken seriously.

    Israel refuses to abide by IAEA guidelines concerning its nukes as they are already distributed around the world. Israel would not be able to produce all of them as most of them are not in Israel, proper. No delivery systems are needed as Israel’s nukes are already in place. Look for another false flag operation with the blame being put on Iran or Syria. You can bet that some Iranian or Syrian passports will be found in the rubble.

    Israel also threatens to detonate nuclear devices in several US cities. Talk about total INSANITY; the so-called Samson Option is it.

    As an aside, American foreign aid is prohibited from being given to any country that has not signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (the Symington Amendment)or refuses to abide by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) guidelines regarding its nuclear devices. Guess what?? Israel does not abide by EITHER and still gets the majority of American foreign aid. This prohibition also applies to countries that do not register their agents of a foreign government with the U S State Department. Guess what?? Israel (again) with its American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) still gets “foreign aid” in contravention of American law..

    There are forty or so congressmen, senators and thousands of high-level policy wonks. infecting the U S government who hold dual citizenship with Israel. Such dual citizenship must be strictly prohibited. Those holding dual citizenship must be required to renounce said foreign citizenship. Refusal to do so should result in immediate deportation with loss of American citizenship. Present and former holders of dual citizenship should never be allowed to serve in any American governmental capacity.

    In addition, any American citizen who serves in a foreign military (Israel Defense Forces) should automatically lose their American citizenship.

    When Netanyahu addressed both houses of congress, it was sickening to see our politicians slobber all over themselves to PROVE that they were unconditional supporters of Israel. It was a scene out of the Soviet Politburo where every jewish or Israel supporter tried to outdo the others with the applause. Just who the hell do they work for? Certainly not for the interests of the American people and the United States,they should renounce their United States citizenship and be deported to Israel.

  128. Mike P says:

    Jeremy Corbyn has proposed stripping English citizenship from English citizens who join the Israel Defense Force.

    The nerve. If this isn’t antisemitic, I don’t know what is. He clearly needs more holocaust education.

  129. We all are tired of ZOG, be it in the good ol US, or France or Germany. The middle east is tired of it. South America is tired of that [and the CIA/NSA combine] .Their constant wars for Izrul, their constant kvetching about mass immigration [to white countries]. We read article upon article in the alternative media but no one seems to be bothered about actually talking about a guy who could severely disrupt the whole circus just by being in the US primaries in 2020. I mean Patrick little.

    why aren’t we putting an article on the UR about Patrick Little. He is THE one guy who is open and candid about ZOG. He was thrown out of the California GOP convention while being a marine VET just because he woke up in 2016 and is now openly hostile to Israel and the ZOG. Talk about “honoring and supporting our troops”.

    Please watch this video. He openly calls them out for the USS liberty incident just outside the convention center. He spits on that flag. There is NO one at present who is more open about ZOG than this guy is. Yet he receives no coverage on the UR. Why is that? Some of you could be skeptical about some one this “good”. Whoever he is and whatever his intention, his words on national TV would have a dynamo effect on the sleeping masses which could then go in any way. We want disruption. He could bring that disruption just by being in the primaries

    • Replies: @Benji
    , @Gg Mo
  130. Skeptikal says:

    I would just say:
    You’re right.
    I am an anti-semite!

    • Replies: @apollonian
  131. Miro23 says:

    This is an absolute MUST READ article by Jonathan Cook to understand Israel today:

    After decades of concessions to the rabbis, Israel’s school system is already heavily skewed towards religion. A survey in 2016 showed 51 percent of Jewish pupils attended sex-segregated religious schools, which emphasise Biblical dogma – up from 33 percent only 15 years earlier.

    This may explain why a recent poll found that 51 percent believe Jews have a divine right to the land of Israel, and slightly more – 56 percent – believe that Jews are a “chosen people”.

    It seems inevitable that US Jews are going to split with Israel at some point, IOW they need their own state which …. surprise -surprise is going to be the USA!

    I calculate that two Boeing 787 “Dreamliners” could easily accommodate the whole of Congress for a one way trip to Israel. And when they arrive, they’ll discover that they’re treated like dog sh.. despite their “unbreakable bond” and “shared values”.

  132. WAS the whole thing all STAGED ..???? a opportunistic rant will received so much media ttention globally…a palestiain baby burnt alive by Israeli IDF child killers…wil not receive any coverage..?!!!

  133. @Colin Wright

    It’s not the Jews.
    It’s the Israeli government, it’s the City of London Jewish bankers, it’s AIPAC, it’s the ADL, it’s the American Zionist Movement, it’s the American Jewish Congress, it’s the Jewish Defense League, it’s all the other Jewish organizations.
    Please stop blaming the Jews.

  134. tac says:

    France’s Jewish Elites Demand Yellow Vest Protests Be Shut Down

    Frnech Police kicking Gilets Jaunes in the face:

  135. tac says:

    Acte XV:





  136. apollonian says: • Website

    All Humanity Is “Anti-Semitic,” Naturally–Why Not?

    I agree, “skeptical”: acknowledging one is anti-Jew by the understood language of “anti-Semite” is easiest, surely most truthful thing to say. Going on and about for long and needless explanation about “semite” referring also to Arabs is probably understood by most people anyway.

    And most people surely understand the entire issue about “anti-Semitism” being so political and politicized–and if they don’t so grasp it, it’s surely useless to waste effort to explaining.

    To speak the entire truth, one surely isn’t necessarily all that much in favor of Arabs–unless one is Arab himself, so why bother? Easiest thing for me is to say, “heck yeah, I’m anti-Semitic, being a good Christian.” Even if one isn’t Christian, it’s being good human being in general to be anti-Semitic, meaning anti-Jew–only confusion would be if one were Arab, and those are still so few, here in USA, at least, it would be waste of effort and breath.

    Nowadays, of course, one must always stop and think if and when so confronted by word, “anti-Semitic”–esp. if one’s job depended on it, as for many corporations, having to be “politically-correct” in this Jewified dictatorship we evermore live in and under.

    Otherwise it should be understood all humanity is anti-Semitic, naturally–who isn’t?–who wouldn’t be?–OF COURSE I’m anti-Semite.

  137. Art says:

    From the long but good article about Israeli Jew rabbis.

    It offers God’s blessing for Jewish terror – not only against Palestinians who try to resist their displacement by settlers, but against all Palestinians, even babies, on the principle that “it is clear that they will grow [up] to harm us.”


    The dramatic rise in religiosity is creating internal problems for Israeli society too, especially for the shrinking secular population and for women. Posters for the forthcoming election – as with adverts more generally – are being “cleaned” of women’s faces in parts of the country to avoid causing offence.

    Hmm — babies and women’s faces! Clearly a danger to Jew male egos and lives.

  138. @mr meener

    Agreed. The US people are that stupid. It’s over here.

  139. @Harbinger

    You are absolutely correct that the mantra “it’s not all Jews” is misleading because, as you point out, you never hear a peep out of the Jewish 2.5 percent of the US population in criticism of Israel.

    All roads lead to the City of London.

    • Replies: @Harbinger
  140. Art says:

    Say Incitatus,

    Are the Big Jews giving you a pass to Patagonia – or are you going to fry like the rest of us, after they make a bobo, and blow up the world.

    Just asking — Art

  141. renfro says:
    @Ralph B. Seymour

    Please stop blaming the Jews.

    As soon as the Jews quit blaming the entire world for their troubles and take responsibility for their own bad actions.

    Seems fair to me.

    • Replies: @Anon
  142. @Wally

    Hi Wally. You’re quite correct about the phony ‘war for oil’ claim that the kosher Left keeps circulating. This decades-old yarn is a deliberate fraud. And it’s sole design is this: to deflect attention away from the real culprit.

    Nevertheless, Liberal ‘anti-war’ icon, Noam Chomsky (and his minions) have been circulating the ‘No Blood for Oil’ deception since Operation Desert Storm. Will it never end?

    Surely, Chomsky and his cronies know that the ‘war-for-oil’ theory does not hold water. This neglected fact is worth noting and worth repeating.

    It is a fact, for instance, that the the major oil companies never lobbied for any Mideast war. Not once. Not ever.

    And why should they?

    After all, Washington’s trillion-dollar destruction of Iran and Libya gave no lasting lift to America’s oil sector or the price of oil stocks. Those who claim otherwise are circulating Israeli fairy tales.

    When it comes to US wars in the Middle East (which invariably end up empowering Israel), Big Oil remains a bit player.

    Fact: once the Iraq war was won, oil contracts there ended up being awarded not to big US oil companies, but to Russian and Chinese concerns!

    The destruction of Saddam’s Iraq was never about oil. Never.

    Saddam Hussein knew this and complained about it.

    The world today is awash in oil. Yet the Mideast wars (and threats of war) just keep coming. Fact: it is Israel–not oil–that drives Washington’s war machine.

    Is this any way to run the American Empire?

    It is if you’re a crypto-Israeli based in America.

    Hard-core Zionists want these US-fought wars to continue so that Israel’s various enemies get crushed, divided, weakened, or altogether annihilated.

    Only US military might can achieve this goal. So Israel is steering America into various wars and harvesting its political fruit. For Israel, this means fewer rivals and more regional power.

    This explains why weak and distant Iran is in America’s cross-hairs. Israel wants Iran reduced to rubble. Washington obeys.

    Iran and Israel are ancient enemies and, while Iran poses no conceivable threat to America, it does potentially threaten Israel’s nuclear monopoly as well as Israel’s long-term goal of being a regional superpower.

    Another revealing fact in this war-for-oil thread is that when the America did have a clear choice to make between ‘helping Israel’ OR ‘securing foreign oil’, Washington chose Israel.

    Oil interests lost out.

    And so did the US economy.

    The Yom Kipper war illustrates this lesson perfectly.

    After Washington’s secret rescue of Israel in that 1973 war, the Arabs launched their first-ever oil embargo against the Zionized West. Americans paid dearly.

    The aftermath of this secret military escapade (conducted by Washington on behalf of the Jewish State) caused the price of oil to quadruple almost overnight. This produced one of the worst recessions in US history.

    Fact: US oil interests were deliberately sacrificed for the benefit of Israel. Few realized it then. Even fewer know it now. But it’s definitely true.

    The real and only winner in that war (and its aftermath) was Israel. Yet on this subject, Americans remain hopelessly confused.


    America’s news and political landscape is dominated by Israeli partisans.

    But the facts are these: with US help, the Jewish state survived an Arab reprisal in 1973, even though the US had no formal military alliance with the Jewish state.

    This Zionist victory allowed the Jews to retain the ‘liberated’ (snatched in 1967) West Bank (including East Jerusalem), Gaza, and Syria’s Golan Heights. And the Zionists are not letting go. Never. And no US president can persuade them otherwise.

    Says Israel: these Arab-inhabited lands are ‘Jewish’. God says so! And Washington pretty-much goes along with this claim. (Since Jimmy Carter, anyway).

    Is this peculiar acquiescence by Washington a policy that is based on perceived national interests, or some moral imperative?–Or is it simply a product of untoward Zionist influence?

    Fact: Zionist hawks (and their liberal, pro-interventionist cousins) in our mass media, on K Street in Washington, in the think tanks, on every elite campus, and throughout the bulk of top political donors, have helped choreograph every pro-Zionist, US military strike since Bush 41.

    No oil company has ever lobbied for these wars. Not one.

    As for Chomsky, let me concede that the Professor does occasionally disclose some unpleasant truths about Israel. But pro-Zionist Noam functions largely as a ‘controlled opposition’ authority figure. He is good for the Jews, including Israeli Jews.

    When push comes to shove, Chomsky can be counted on to ‘not to go too far’ in his criticisms of Israel (or its artificial centrality in American life).

    Chomsky’s status as an unbiased, truth-telling Left-wing prophet allows him to set the boundaries of acceptable discourse’ vis-a-vis America’s Number One, most precious, democratic ally. And it works.

    This helps Israel win grudging support from the clueless goyim, especially the naive, anti-war liberals found on most US campuses.

    Chomsky therefore does invaluable P.R. work for the Zionist entity since it is ideal (from an Israeli perspective) that a prominent Jew occupies the top spot in America’s amorphous but highly-visible sector of public intellectuals. In this prestigious strata, Chomsky reigns supreme. He’s the Bob Dylan of anti-war intellectuals.
    But Chomsky is ultimately a phony. After over 50 years of Zionist military occupation in Palestine, he still opposes BDS. (Dylan does too!) What fakes! Such false gods.

    How absolutely perfect for Israel.

    How utterly damaging for Americans and countless others.

    • Agree: Cleburne
    • Replies: @republic
  143. Tyrion 2 says:

    No, his shadow Chancellor did, just at the same time as he advocated open borders. All Corbyn has done recently is stab the British people in the back over Brexit.

    • Replies: @Iris
  144. Macron himself, a convinced high-globalist, is only moderately interested in these matters.
    I agree with all the author says but the above quote is wrong. Macron is a Rothschild’s child and was a minion in his bank.

  145. Harbinger says:
    @Ralph B. Seymour

    “All roads lead to the City of London.”

    Some say “All roads lead to Rome”, that is those who believe in the Jesuit rubbish.

    While I will certainly agree that the Crown Corporation of the City of London is the driving force behind Zionism, in the west, Zionism’s roots lie with the Pharisees. All Jews are the same in that they, by calling themselves Jews, will adhere to the Babylonian Talmud, simply because you either believe in the Christ, as being foretold to come from the line of Judah or you don’t. All of this crap about a ‘Jewish messiah’ is merely a smokescreen to hide the fact that the Jewish people are their own messiah. They believe they are God.
    A Jew, whether Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Donmeh, Ethiopian, Iranian, Syrian, Palestinian, Iraqi, Saudi Arabian (House of Saud is Jewish), Orthodix, Karaite, Messianic, Oriental… not follow the Old testament for if they did, they would, in a nutshell, be Christians, accepting the foretelling of the son of God as their saviour. To have us believe that “We believe in the old testament but do not believe that Christ is the son of God” proves that they are merely confusing fact. They also broke God’s commandment of not killing when they executed him. The Jews have nothing to do with the Israelites and the Hebrews, nor the Old Testament. They are not of them, nor do they follow it.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  146. @Ralph B. Seymour

    You, my friend are a minority, as are the Palestinians in Israel too.
    Are the Jews super smart or just well connected internationally?
    How come the City of London Jewish bankers, the AIPAC, the ADL, the American Zionist Movement, the American Jewish Congress, the Jewish Defense League, and all the other Jewish organizations have taken control of the world?
    Unless a majority of ordinary Jews join the 9 to 5 mundane humanity prepare for retribution. We are not cattle.

  147. Harbinger says:

    Judaism and Zionism are one and the same. The latter is merely the desire for a homeland for the former and come part and parcel with one another.
    Phariseesm/Talmudism is Judaism-> Judaism is Zionism-> Zionism is Communism-> Communism is Internationalism-> Internationalism is Globalism.
    Therefore Judaism is NOT a religion but a cult, nothing more than the worship of the self and the belief they are their own messiah and therefore Gods. This is exactly the same belief as freemasonry and considering that Jews call freemasonry “Talmudism for the Goyim” then it’s pretty obvious from the get go.

    Those who wish to corrupt and destroy have always done so through nefarious ways and remaining hidden, conspiring to the detriment of others. The truth has always stood out front and been bold as it’s never had to hide from anyone nor thing.
    All secret organizations, most certainly have something to do with Jewry, because only the Jews would cheat, lie and deceive. It’s their nature -> a la fable of the scorpion and the frog sums up the Jews inability to tell the truth.

  148. Benji says:
    @Thomm's Purple haired femiNAZI

    I agree, but I am not a US talmudic slave. How about Patrick Little for UN General Secretary?

    Your nom de plum reminds me of this great old hippy song

  149. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:

    You are out of your league taking on Incitatus. Your limited spluttering protestations just show you up as not able to compete on the same ground.

    • Troll: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  150. @Harbinger

    “Crown Corporation of the City of London”. I shall resume reading if you can assure me that you have just let slip egregious nonsense as a literal slip rather than as a manifestation of mad ingrained prejudices.

    • Replies: @Harbinger
  151. Mulegino1 says:

    Hardly, if one is to judge from the readers’ responses.

    If I were you, I would try and open an objective book dealing with the period from 1933 to 1945, not the establishment’s kosher junk history- which is in reality crude and vastly oversimplified propaganda, cooked up in the perfervid

    Of course, the Jewish weltanschauung, with its hallucinatory and paranoid guilt mongering and sense of supreme victim entitlement cannot stand real truth in history.

    The harnessing, by world Jewry, of the Russian, British and American people as its servile oxen in harness, led to the most destructive and murderous consequences in recorded history.

  152. @Iris

    So, to the French, it has that double-meaning? That’s just what I suspected.

  153. Harbinger says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    An incredibly arrogant and ridiculously disrespectful first reply to me. I couldn’t care less what you choose to do and from this day forth rightly ignored.

    • Replies: @Anon
  154. Incitatus says:

    “You’re forgetting that France declared war on Germany, not the other way around.”

    Strawman. Didn’t say otherwise.

    You opined France better off occupied, remember? Given contrary evidence, you change the subject.

    “the western Allies were responsible for more French civilian deaths- and real atrocities- than the Germans were”

    Enumeration and citations please.

    “With respect to the diets of the “occupied” countries, don’t even go there…”

    Already there and back. Sorry. Starvation rations are on record. So is Backe’s Hungerplan with its 20-30 million death estimate.

    “the mass murder of German “disarmed enemy forces” in Eisenhower’s starvation camps and the deliberate efforts to starve the German people after the war”

    Strong allegations. If true, how do they excuse Germany starving 3.5 million Soviet POWs to death? 4.2 million Soviet citizens (mostly Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians)? Working 2.4 million foreign laborers to death in Germany ‘42-45? Homicidal policy in occupied areas? Ethnic cleansing, murder?

    Germany certainly suffered. 2.1 million perished in expulsions, 434,000 in Allied bombing, 5+ million in combat, flattened cities, etc. Genuinely tragic. Victims of criminally incompetent leadership.

    “The so called “liberators” were far more destructive, homicidal and malign than the German National Socialists”

    You’re welcome to believe that. Few agree. In any case, be consoled by good National Socialist policy direct from Mr. Big himself:

    “He who wants to live should fight, therefore, and he who does not want to battle in this world of eternal struggle does not deserve to be alive.”

    -Adolf Hitler ‘Mein Kampf’ Chapter 11 Volume 1, 1925

    “If the German people are no longer strong enough and ready to sacrifice their own blood for their existence, then they should perish and be wiped out by another, stronger power. They are no longer worthy of the place they have won for themselves.”

    -Adolf Hitler, remarks to the Danish Foreign Minister 27 Nov 1941

    You might say the Allies took the Führer’s advice.

    Reichminister Fritz Todt (one of the few capable Nazis) told Hitler “This war can no longer be won by military means…[it] can only be ended politically” 29 Nov ‘41. Failure to destroy the USSR by winter was as fatal as von Moltke missing the Schlieffen Plan timetable in September 1914, and Todt was honest enough to say it. He also warned direct US involvement would be terminal.

    Hitler, ever messianic, declared war on the US two weeks later (11 Dec ’41). Reason? “We can’t lose the war at all; we now have an ally [Japan] which has never been conquered in 3000 years.”

    Incompetent, suicidal leadership.

  155. Anon[312] • Disclaimer says:

    PS, Israel is a very large American army base that would not exist if there was no oil in the surrounding neighbourhood.

    A garbage reply, all around.

    Geographic Israel has been a religious concept and goal for at least 2,000 years. The foreign Semitic religious structures have had hegemony in the West for most of that time. That is, they have defined the over-arching religious and thus political thought in the West for that time.

    You’re “its about the oil” is a Kosher conspiracy meant to absolve Judaism. Its nonsense.

    The largest, most powerful forces in the West have been driving toward Israel for thousands of years. That has nothing to do with oil. Moreover, if you were the least bit read in Biblical myth and Jewish law and its commentary, you’d know that the unfolding events in the world match the “prophecies” (political instructions) in those books. Because the Jews are bringing them to bear on purpose, just like for:

    Palestine is what happens when there is no work and play (which makes Johnny a very dull boy)

    Again, if you had knowledge of their books, you’d know that “Palestine is what happens when” religious zealouts demand in their “prophecies” the Palestinians be persecuted and eventually genocided. As they are in the Old Testament. You’d know that Damascus (Syria) was demanded to be ethnically cleansed.

    All of their books are fake. They are political instructions to themselves, which they take seriously by attempting to bring each instruction or myth into being in order to reach their Messianic period. Two hundred and twenty one years to go and counting down. Its a form of superstitious attempt at “magic” from 2,000 plus years ago. If there is a hell, Judaism and its adherents are what emanated from it

    Your comments are meant to excuse these assholes from antiquity who are fucking up the world for everyone with their fake-religious genocidal psychopathy. Be gone.

  156. Iris says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Corbyn and McDonnell never advocated open borders: they called for the respect of the Geneva Convention.

    Furthermore, their principal support is Len Maccluskey and his the “Unite” union which members are rightly concerned about the importation of cheap labour to the UK.

    And Corbyn did not “stab the British people in the back” over Brexit; it is the lazy Talmudic Conservative former PM David Cameron who botched a referendum.
    Convinced that the outcome would be “No”, he did not bother adding the second logical question in case of “Yes”, which should have been: What type of Brexit do the British people want?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  157. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:

    As soon as the Jews quit blaming the entire world for their troubles and take responsibility for their own bad actions.

    Seems fair to me.

    They cannot do that.

    Their most significant religious rite, on their highest holy day of Yom Kippur, is the goat sacrifice to Samael, their Satan, who they hold to be our god.

    The sacrifice is a bribe to have “Samael” place the sins of Jews on the heads of gentiles.

    Again, this scapegoat ritual, or the blaming of others for the sins of the Jews, is the central religious rite of Judaism. It defines who they are and how they operate.

    As the Feast of Tabernacles / Yom Kippur period of each year represents the apocalyptic period of judgement (the harvest), and the Jews believe in recreating their mythical symbolism so that they will rule in their Messianic period, expect the Jews to take us into the apocalypse by blaming their sins on others on a grand scale. In that, they believe that others will pay for those sins with genocide (being harvested in the apocalypse), while the Jews will be absolved, escape punishment to a degree, and be around to rule in their Messianic period.

  158. c matt says:

    It’s some small comfort to know that France is plagued with its own version of AIPAC, and thus we are not alone.

  159. c matt says:

    Just report every crime by a non-white against a white as a hate crime, and those stats will fly through the roof! Problem solved.

    • Replies: @renfro
  160. c matt says:
    @Hans Vogel

    It is very neat spray painting though – quite professional!

    • Replies: @Christo
  161. Anon[106] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ralph B. Seymour

    It’s not the Jews.
    It’s the Israeli government, it’s the City of London Jewish bankers, it’s AIPAC, it’s the ADL, it’s the American Zionist Movement, it’s the American Jewish Congress, it’s the Jewish Defense League, it’s all the other Jewish organizations.
    Please stop blaming the Jews.

    Really? Are you sure?

    Do the Jews believe in a Messianic period, to begin within 221 years from today at max, in which they will rule the planet, own all of the land and wealth, and have gentiles as slaves? Per the Tanakh?

    Yes they do, as a matter of ethnic-religious identification.

    With any remaining gentiles genocided as all “impurity” is removed from the Earth?

    Given that your Zohar holds that all gentiles are so “impure” that they defile their own bodies, that the bodies are only purified upon their deaths, and that the world will be purified in the Jewish apocalypse?

    Yes they do, as a matter of ethnic-religious identification.

    Does the entire Torah of Judaism not include the Tanakh, the Talmud, and the Kabbalah? Making them all doctrinal for all Jews who identify as such?

    I know for a fact that it does.

    Which means that, per your Zohar, that you believe that all gentiles are not technically human but instead have the souls of animals (beasts).

    Does Rashi not go so far as to qualify some gentiles as rocks, in commentary of your super-cool OT code that is always referring to non-Jews as animals and such inanimate objects?

    Yes he does.

    This is all doctrinal for all Jews who practice Judaism or who give support to the Jewish ethnic group in any way, shape, or form. This is doctrinal for all Jews, and all Jews are meant to work toward this result.

    Because these beliefs are what defines a Jew and Judaism, per the core texts of Judaism.

    So don’t come here and tell us that it is not the Jews. The existence of Judaism and the identity of Jews is defined by the above detailed expected result. This means that, yes, it is all Jews.

    This also means that your historic accusers were correct, as their consistency hints, and your denials are incorrect. As they are here.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    , @Ralph Seymour
  162. Anon[381] • Disclaimer says:

    There is not a Jewish position.

    Sure there is a Jewish position.

    The Jewish position is the Messianic period in which all other nations are dissolved and Jews rule from Israel, to be a reality in no more than 221 years from today.

    That is the quintessential Jewish position, because it defines what Judaism is.

    So, all of this Jewish bickering over what to do with gentile blood is a mere show. At best, it serves to give Jews a measure of plausible deniability that few believe. But the Jews are good at yelling in court and this is all that they need in that context, especially when their media is covering their trial in the court of public opinion.

    In reality, that Jews can or should have any say whatseover in the future of gentile nations outside of Israel is an abomination. They are not arguing over their own blood and land, but that of others.

    Per the Jewish Tanakh, the Jewish position on other nations is one of destruction, dispossession, and genocide. This is what defines the approach of Judaism and its members to all other nations except for Israel (the people and geographic country).

    Jews should be quarantined as a severe sociopolitical hazard to other nations. If a Jews is cauight debating the blood or land of anyone who is not them, a severe example should be made. Jews should be afraid to think of the blood or land of any other nation but their own, let alone feel comfortable debating them.

  163. c matt says:

    No, I’d have to say the real valuable resource is not oil, but being the world reserve currency. Hence, the heavy influence of Jews in banking/monetary policy. So long as the dollar remains such, things will limp along. Think of the game of monopoly – if you get to be the banker, and everyone has to use your monopoly money, then you can pretty much control everything else. Once you lose the banker/money printer position, that is when WWIII starts.

  164. renfro says:
    @c matt

    Whites aren’t covered under hate crime law definitions unless the white person is either homosexual or disabled.

  165. Incitatus says:

    Hello Wally!

    “Zionist nonsense concerning alleged “seizure” of France’s economy… Just what the Germans would have wanted, another country to support. LOL”

    Comprehension not what it once was? Germans weren’t “supporting” France. Occupied France – stripped of production, commodities and labor – was supporting Nazi Germany. Starvation rations (44% of German calories). 400 million francs per day for the pleasure of being occupied.

    “Anyway, you’ve made a clown of yourself again and merely repeated what has already refuted in spades…”

    Really? Missed it. Not the first time. Kindly direct me to such.

    “Your ‘hunger plan’: “Everything was done to make ordinary Germans well-fed and comfortable while out-of-sight subjects starved-to-death”: is purely made up, it too is hilariously desperate.”

    Hitler’s fear of repeating domestic WW1 shortages is well documented. Revolt on the home front ala 1918 was greatly feared. As long as Germans were reasonably well fed, they wouldn’t attack NSDAP leadership. Hitler was right. He took them right over the abyss.

    Backe’s Hunger Plan was part of Göring’s Plan Oldenburg (‘Green Folder’ = Grüne Mappe), the economic agenda for Barbarossa. Approved in a secret meeting 1 Mar ’41, developed during subsequent months into a plan dividing occupied territory into five inspectorates attached to three army groups that would exploit food and resources. 20 to 30 million “superfluous” and “racially inferior” Slavs were to be deprived of foodstuffs sent to the Wehrmacht and Reich. It was adopted 29 Apr ‘41, finalized 8 May ’41.

    Barbarossa stalling winter 41-42 was the worst nightmare. Göring, just as at Dunkirk and the Battle of Britain, promised miracles he couldn’t deliver. It only got worse. His words:

    “I have here before me reports on what you are expected to deliver…it makes no difference to me in this connection if you say that your people will starve. Let them do so, as long as no German collapses from hunger. If you had been present when the Gauleiter spoke here [yesterday], you would understand my boundless anger over the fact that we conquered such enormous territories through the valor of our troops, and yet our people have almost been forced down to the miserable rations of the First World War….I am interested only in those people in the occupied regions who work in armaments and food production. They must receive just enough to enable them to continue working.

    – Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, Address on Agricultural Quotas to Occupied Territory Officials 6 Aug 1942 [emphasis added]

    “Made up”? “Hilariously desperate”? Don’t think so.

    “I remind everyone, Zionist Incitatus was quite demolished by me in the comments…”

    Thanks for that reminder. Please quote my “Zionism”.

    Losing a debate, you throw mud. “Desperate” indeed.

    Demolished? Last we spoke I asked why former Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher and his wife were shot point-blank in the face 30 Jun 1934. As I recall (correct me if I’m wrong), you sputtered something about “treason” and went no further. Care to re-engage? While you’re at it, explain the extra-judicial murders of the other 150-200 Operation Hummingbird victims.

    Start with Willi Schmid, music critic for the Müncher Neueste Nachtricten. Mistaken for SA Willi Schmidt, arrested 30 Jun ’34 in front of his family while playing the cello in his study. His body was returned to family in a sealed casket four days later with written instructions from the SS not to open it in any circumstance. Rudolf Hess visited days later to express regret for the mistake and offer the widow a state pension. Guess what? She emigrated to USA.

    How could that happen, Wally? Weren’t Aryans – loyal SA and innocents like Willi Schmid – entitled to due process and a trial?

    T4 (200,000 Aryan victims) was also discussed, ably defended by Magnificent BM with the oxymoron “involuntary assisted suicide”. Known off planet as state murder. Feel free to reengage on that as well.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  166. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    You have just been shown up as a prejudiced ignoramus O Sensitive Soul, so you will have to do better if you want respect from anyone.

  167. @Incitatus

    I suppose Wally is what he seems to be and that has been enough for me to decide that life is not long enough to bother reading him for the occasional one in a ten thousand polished stone amidst the dross so I am grateful to you for your replies which include so much detailed material that I am unaware of – like what you quote from Gõring and about Willi Schmid.

    Wally is genuine compared with some actual or pseudo Muslim commenter allegedly an engineer in Canada who, I noted, deputed his trollery to what seemed like some overenthusiastic students in Islamabad. Eventually he disappeared. Now I think there is another, rather different, troll seeking to make criticism of Zionists look over-the-top ridiculous. He calls himself Benny. What do you think?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  168. @Wizard of Oz

    Sorry about Samsung’s aggressive and persistent Autofill/Spell check. “Benny should be “Benjy”.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  169. Avrier says:

    Back to anti semitism vs anti zionism at least for non Jewish persons :

    A Zionist is an antisemite who does no like Jews and wants them to leave his country,natural destination: Israel .He is in favour of a strong Israel for fear of seeing them back again.

    An Anti Zionist loves the Jews and wants to keep them in his country.

  170. Tyrion 2 says:

    Pathetic shilling for Corbyn! Yes, he has stabbed us in the back. Just at the end of negotiations, when the EU is about to concede, he throws his full support behind a second referendum. Fortunately, his betrayal will not succeed.

    As for whether the referendum needed more questions as to what leaving the EU meant, it obviously meant leaving the EU. If there is to be a normal trade agreement based on goods and services between the two sovereign entities after that, well that’s for our representatives to work out and negotiate.

    Finally, like all dishonest political actors for open borders – Corbyn doesn’t explicitly argue for them, he and his team instead just vociferously attack any enforcement. That is, when they’re not decrying the cheek of a white British man daring to cook Jamaican food – doesn’t he know that Jamaican food can only be cooked by Jamaicans (his superiors), anything else is theft, and that Britain belongs to everyone but the British?

    Also, for Unite being patriots on immigration – who do you think you’re kidding? They’re more pro immigration and pro one-sided “anti”-racism and pro “affirmative” action than almost any institution in the country.

    For decades, these ideologues who had captured the British unions have managed to get by on historical loyalty from the British working class. Not anymore, they have realised they’ve been betrayed and have left Corbyn’s Labour party in droves. A huge programme of unrealistic gibs will never make up for treason on the national question and bring them back.

  171. @Incitatus

    Thank you for your informative comment.

    The impressiveness of Hitler’s rise is paralleled by the absoluteness of his fall. He was always an all-or-nothing kind of guy and prone to hysterical outbursts to get his way, even in public. One sees this even in the Beer Hall Putsch, although no doubt his risk-taking personality made his rise to power possible.

    What is striking, and somewhat puzzling, for me is the astuteness of his policymaking from 1933 to 1941. He carefully consolidated power, took time to restore Germany’s economy and military, was if anything rather cautious in foreign policy, going from strength to strength, tearing up the Versailles Treaty, largely peacefully uniting the Germans of Central Europe, and fighting the Western powers only as a last resort. After the victory of May-June 1940, he imposed pragmatic terms on France (not dissimilar, in fact more moderate, than what Napoleon imposed on Prussia) and sought peace and collaboration with the British Empire.

    Then, between June and December 1941, Hitler’s policy can only be described as reckless hubris, digging himself into a hole from which no change in policy could get him out. He, Germany, and all of Europe paid and are continuing to pay an intolerable price. The invasion of the Soviet Union as such was an understandable preemptive strike – Stalin’s empire could certainly not be trusted it would take the West 50 years of Cold War to eliminate it. However, the oppression of the Slavs (Poland already reduced to a non-state), the extermination of the Soviet elite (making any surrender/collaboration on their part impossible, in contrast with France), and the declaration of war against the United States (even if Roosevelt was already effectively at war in the Atlantic) spelled Germany’s doom.

    Germany was a small country compared to America, Russia, or the British Empire, with virtually no natural resources. Germany’s geopolitical position was much weaker than Napoleonic France’s a century earlier, and Hitler acted much more recklessly. Perhaps his tremendous successes had got to his head, his previously limited power had kept in check some of his more deranged and reckless inclinations. I have not read a good account or explanation for all this. Perhaps one exists.

    Do you have a good source to learn more about the Hungerplan?

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Mulegino1
    , @Incitatus
  172. Benjy says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Now I think there is another, rather different, troll seeking to make criticism of Zionists look over-the-top ridiculous.”

    Why do you write that? Are you saying that I am “over the top”? Seriously, please provide an example and explain what makes it “over the top”.

    In effect, what you are saying is that my opinionss are outside of your personal overton window. On the other hand there is no thought that you could have that I would claim is “over the top” and use it as justification to call you a troll. Ignorant or untrue perhaps, but not “over the top”.

  173. Mike P says:
    @Guillaume Durocher

    [Hitler …] was always an all-or-nothing kind of guy and prone to hysterical outbursts to get his way, even in public.

    What is striking, and somewhat puzzling, for me is the astuteness of his policymaking from 1933 to 1941. He carefully consolidated power, took time to restore Germany’s economy and military, was if anything rather cautious in foreign policy …

    Groan. Has it ever occurred to you that he used his “hysteric outbursts” in a calculated way, ONLY for public consumption, but that they were in fact not his real modus operandi?

    There is any number of madmen in the world, hysterical, sociopathic, whatever. They don’t usually find themselves in positions of power; and if they do, they don’t navigate an extremely difficult economic and diplomatic environment as adroitly as Hitler did.

    Regarding his “digging himself into a hole,” well, his opponents refused to come to the table, just as the Western allies had done in WW1; his mistake then was to refuse to give up. The grave abuse suffered by the German people after the war, at the hands of ALL allies including the French, kind of makes his point for him, wouldn’t you say?

  174. Actually, it was Britain and France (and Poland) who started a war they couldn’t finish and suffered ruin because of it, it just took several decades for the rot to be fully revealed (in Britain and France’s case, there is ironically still some hope for Poland). It should be emphasized that Britain and France (who again, declared war on Nazi Germany, not vice versa) could not defeat Germany without American and Soviet assistance. Their descent into Orwellian, Third World toilet status is richly deserved.

    I will say, Macron at least looks uncomfortable in that picture, when he’s surrounded by half-naked black dudes his exhilaration could not be more obvious.

  175. Robjil says:

    This anti-Semite protest march in France happened on February 19, Purim Katan. Purim Katan is called minor Purim. Jewish leap years have two months named Adar. This year is a Jewish leap year, so it has a Adar I and Adar II. Adar is the month of Purim. In both Adars, the 14th day is a Purim. In Adar I,there was a Purim Katan, the minor Purim, on February 19. The march happening on this date, makes the event appear to be a planned event for Zgoals. The regular Purim this year is on March 21. What will happen this year on the regular Purim?

    “PARIS (AP) – Rallies against anti-Semitism attracted crowds of thousands in Paris and other French cities Tuesday following a series of aggressive acts with Jewish targets, including a cemetery where about 80 gravestones were spray-painted with swastikas overnight.”

  176. Mulegino1 says:
    @Guillaume Durocher

    The Germans were fighting for their survival as a sovereign nation and to free themselves from the economic death grip of the international financial order. Hitler knew he was fighting against time itself, as the British war party (with heavy backing from international Jewry) was determined to initiate a war for Germany’s destruction, and FDR’s regime was bound and determined to involve itself in the conflict, despite the overwhelming opposition of the American people. In hindsight, Hitler’s greatest mistake was making an official declaration of war against the US.- even though he was entirely justified in doing so, given the outrageous violations of neutrality committed by the US government, particularly the illegal naval war in the Atlantic. His second greatest mistake was to divert precious German resources to shore up Mussolini’s disastrous military campaigns in Southeastern Europe and North Africa.

    As noted, Operation Barbarossa was a necessary preemptive strike which bought time for Europe; if the Germans had not struck first, and the Soviets had seized the Romanian oil fields, Germany, and all of Europe, would have been defenseless against the onslaught of unprecedented military might.

    (It is odd how we are constantly subject to the outraged paroxysms of establishment historians who never cease bringing up “German aggression against Poland” while deliberately passing over the far more egregious Soviet invasions of Poland, Finland, Bessarabia, and the Baltic countries.)

    If anyone was reckless, it was the British and French turned a German-Polish border war into a major European conflagration- which Hitler did not want and tried desperately to avoid- and they ended up losing their empires, their effective national sovereignty and ended up as the primary satraps for NATO and EU hegemony. Their reckless policies forced Hitler- who had no desire for a war in the west- to preempt Anglo-French aggression in Norway, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

    • Replies: @Avrier
  177. Mulegino1 says:

    You opined France better off occupied, remember? Given contrary evidence, you change the subject.

    You appear to opine that France is better off today than under the German occupation. In what appreciable sense is this true? Were Frenchmen punished for their opinions on, say, the Franco-Prussian war during the German occupation, as opposed to contemporary, CRIF and EU occupied France, where French historians are persecuted and punished for their opinions on the events pertaining to the Second World War?

    Undoubtedly the Germans prohibited political activity in occupied France, but allowed Vichy to conduct its own foreign policy and to keep its own fleet and empire.

    “the western Allies were responsible for more French civilian deaths- and real atrocities- than the Germans were”

    Enumeration and citations please.

    Oh, please. It is a well known fact that many towns in France- say Normandy- were reduced to rubble by the USAAF and the RAF. This was not the case with the Luftwaffe, which did not even have a fleet of heavy bombers at its disposal, and whose mission was conceived of as close in tactical support of land and sea combat operations.

    It is an undeniable and indisputable fact that Britain initiated the genocidal policy of aerial bombing, not the Germans- and this policy was subsequently adopted by the USAAF. Just one more evidence of Allied barbarism in the aerial campaign was the destruction of Monte Cassino, the ancient monastery founded by St. Benedict in the 5th Century- for no appreciable military purpose. (The German forces did not occupy the monastery, only the surrounding hills. The Allied barbarians could have cared less.) Equally as horrible were the mass rapes committed upon the women in the surrounding villages by the Free French Somalians with the full blessing of General Juin.

    Strong allegations. If true, how do they excuse Germany starving 3.5 million Soviet POWs to death? 4.2 million Soviet citizens (mostly Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians)? Working 2.4 million foreign laborers to death in Germany ‘42-45? Homicidal policy in occupied areas? Ethnic
    cleansing, murder?

    The starving of the Soviet POW’s was unarguably tragic, but the Soviet regime bore most of the responsibility for this- it refused to become a signatory to the Geneva Convention, refused reciprocal treatment agreements, and- Red Army personnel taken prisoner- under direct orders from Comrade Stalin- under a sentence of death. This is exemplified by Stalin’s refusal to negotiate the return of his own sons captured by the Germans for Hitler’s nephew. His son subsequently committed suicide. At least Stalin can be credited for consistency and impartiality.

    Where are the mass graves of the “2.4 million slave laborers” allegedly starved to death by the Germans? I would challenge anyone to compare the conditions at the German camps with conditions in the Gulag or in Eisenhower’s starvation camps.

    I guess every Red Army member killed on the battlefield was a “peaceful Soviet citizen.”

    Even you ought to know that Germany had little choice but to invade the Soviet Union, given the enormous deployments along the western frontiers of the USSR during the spring and early summer of 1941- in offensive formations and in vulnerable salients- including the 9th Rifle Corps deployed within close proximity to the Romanian oil fields. Had the Soviets seized the fields, Europe would have been left with a mere few weeks of oil supply, and rendered effectively defenseless before the enormous Soviet onslaught.

    • Replies: @Lurker
  178. Mulegino1 says:

    Reichminister Fritz Todt (one of the few capable Nazis) told Hitler “This war can no longer be won by military means…[it] can only be ended politically” 29 Nov ‘41. Failure to destroy the USSR by winter was as fatal as von Moltke missing the Schlieffen Plan timetable in September 1914, and Todt was honest enough to say it. He also warned direct US involvement would be terminal.
    itler, ever messianic, declared war on the US two weeks later (11 Dec ’41). Reason? “We can’t lose the war at all; we now have an ally [Japan] which has never been conquered in 3000 years.”

    Incompetent, suicidal leadership.

    Uh, what the Reichminister may or may not have known was that there would never be a “political solution”
    Hto the war, since the entire object of it- at least in the European theater- was the destruction of Germany as a functional and sovereign nation. This was evinced more strongly by the subsequent stupid policy of “unconditional surrender” demanded by the western Allies. You cannot have a “political” solution to the war when the demand from one side is “unconditional surrender.” Contrast this with Germany’s peace terms with France in 1940-

    The French were able to form their own government in Vichy, keep their Empire and their fleet (later treacherously destroyed by the British) and have a national hero (General Petain) installed as their head of state.

    Do you want to talk about “suicidal leadership”? The British, above all else, were led by a drunken deadbeat and bloodthirsty warmonger, whose insistence upon carrying on the war despite the many offers of peace from Hitler cost Britain its empire and turned it into Airstrip 1. England has lost its culture, its heritage and its empire.

    France is little more than a NATO satrap with a creepy Rothschild pipsqueak at its head- enslaved to CRIF and EU tyranny.

    Talk about suicidal leadership. The Europe of nations was destroyed by the Allies and is fast becoming a third world dump.

  179. tac says:

    Here is a testimonial (in English) from the French Lawyer as to the repressed truth of what is happening to the Gilets Jaunes inside of France and the fake narratives the French Media propagate around the world in order to disinform people:

  180. Avrier says:

    ” His second greatest mistake was to divert precious German resources to shore up Mussolini’s disastrous military campaigns in Southeastern Europe and North Africa.”

    In Southeastern Europe you are right
    In North Africa not much reinforcement to the Afrika Korps which almost reached Egypt would have allowed the seizure of the Suez canal and continuing through friendly countries reaching the Bakou oil fields without frozen feet,

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  181. Mulegino1 says:

    Good point. Also the failure of the Germans to occupy Malta, which would have essentially denied the Royal Navy access to the Eastern Mediterranean- not to mention a joint Spanish-German move on Gibraltar, which would have rendered the entire sea inaccessible.

    Of course, by November of 1940 and the last meetings between Hitler, Ribbentrop and Molotov, Hitler’s focus necessarily became the threat the Soviet Union posed to Central and Western Europe. It was clear that Soviet intentions were focused upon the reoccupation of Finland, the annexation of Bukovina and a move to secure the Dardanelles.

    Hitler made many decisions- some of which, in retrospect, turned out to be mistakes. But he was hardly an irrational madman.

    • Replies: @Avrier
  182. republic says:

    Wasn’t prior knowledge of 9/11 exposed at a Jewish cemetery?

  183. republic says:
    @mark green

    Chomsky, Assange and Snowden all accept the official 9/11 narrative.

    Very interesting

  184. Incitatus says:
    @Guillaume Durocher

    Great post – thanks.

    “between June and December 1941, Hitler’s policy can only be described as reckless hubris, digging himself into a hole from which no change in policy could get him out.”

    Hitler ordered Barbarossa planning a year earlier (31 Jul ‘40). Two months after Dunkirk (26 May-4 Jun ’41). A month after Compiègne (22 Jun ’40). A day before ordering the bombing of Britain (1 Aug ’40)! Priorities?

    Why, England unresolved, was his mind on the east? He confirmed Ost invasion plans Dec ’40. Lebensraum (Mein Kampf ’24, Hoßbach ‘37) seems the core of his being. Dead center was belief in primal struggle for dominant survival. Nothing less would do.

    Having brilliantly accomplished so much without bloodshed, why did he turn to war? He promised “This [Sudetenland] is the last territorial demand I have to make in Europe, but it is a demand on which I will not yield” (26 Sep ’38 Berlin). Three days later Chamberlain and Deladier gave him what he wanted. No bloodshed. Behind the scenes? Göbbels records Hitler’s regret. Why? Hitler preferred force. It alone proved supremacy. Rump Czechoslovakia was the next target.

    “[The Führer issued orders to formulate] a sudden attack…so that the Czechs have no chance to organize any sort of defense…[The goal was] to rapidly occupy the country and seal off Czech from Slovak territory”.

    – Göbbels Tagebücher part 1, vol.6, p.246

    “This [Hácha’s dismissal of Nazi ally Tiso] is a launching pad. Now we can get a complete solution to the problem we were only half able to solve in October…Decision: on Wednesday 15 March [1939], we’ll invade and destroy the entire monstrous construct that is Czechoslovakia.”

    -Göbbels Tagebücher part 1, vol.6, p.279

    Hitler summoned sixty-seven year old Czech president Emile Hácha to the Reich Chancellery 14 Mar ’39. After waiting hours, Göring arrives (1:30 am 15 Mar ’39) to demand surrender of Czechoslovakia:

    “Excellency, please sign. I hate to say it, but my job is not the easiest one. Prague, your capital – I should be terribly sorry if I were compelled to destroy this beautiful city. But I would have to do it, to make the English and French understand that my air force can do all it claims to do. Because they still don’t want to believe this is so, and I should like an opportunity of giving them proof.”

    Hàcha has a heart attack, is revived, lamely approves German occupation. It happens the same day (15 Mar ’39). So much for Hitler’s “last territorial demand”. Poland is next on his list.

    “I will provide a propagandistic casus belli. Its credibility doesn’t matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth.”

    -Adolf Hitler 22 Aug 1939 to Generals on Fall Weiß, the invasion of Poland [Wirtz, Godson ‘Twenty-First Century Challenge’ p.100; Lightbody ‘Second World War’ p.39]

    Hitler seems obsessed with martial dominance. Winning peacefully didn’t sate his appetite. Dominance had to be trial by arms.

    “all-or-nothing kind of guy and prone to hysterical outbursts to get his way, even in public. One sees this even in the Beer Hall Putsch”

    Very true.

    Hitler’s behavior during/after the Putsch is revealing. He tells Kahr, Seisser and Lossow he has a bullet for each, plus one for himself, if things didn’t work out. Next morning (9 Nov ’23) he tells Feder “If it comes off, everything’s fine. If it doesn’t, we’ll hang ourselves.”Later the same day he reaches for his revolver while saying “now all is lost”, dissuaded only by Helen Hanfstaengl. Visibly depressed, he goes on a 10-day hunger strike at Landsberg. Taken to the prison infirmary, he tells psychologist Alois Maria Ott “I’ve had enough. I’m done. If I had a revolver, I’d use it.”

    Steady statesman or suicidal winner-take-all nut case?

    Nine years later, amidst declining support and depleted party funds, refusing subordinate cabinet posts:

    “If the party falls apart, I’ll finish myself off with a pistol within three minutes”

    -Adolf Hitler recorded in Göbbels, Tagebücher 2 Sep 1932 p.297].

    Seppuku (suicide) in Japan is one thing. Not a German path. What was Hitler thinking?

    He embraces risk, theatrics, death? Ruthlessness, but careful enough to postpone martyrdom? Wagnerian liebestod always seeking the best possible immolation?

    Wish I knew.

    Hungerplan sources? Nicolas Stargardt ‘The German War’ and ‘Witnesses of War”.

    Hitler? Volker Ullrich: ‘Hitler: Ascent 1889-1939’ (his second volume is recently published). Kershaw, Shirer, Fest, Weber, Bullock, Speer, etc. No doubt you know them all.


    • Replies: @Benjy
  185. Avrier says:

    A joint German Spanish move on Gibratar was out of question after Franco’s adamant refusal during the Bayonne meeting

    But the faliure to occupy Malta, so strategically important, is difficult to understand with the availability of experienced airborne troops later sacrificed in Kreta and the Italian navy resources to transport and protect an amphibious operation no to mention the Luftwaffe

    • Replies: @Lurker
    , @Mulegino1
  186. Benjy says:

    As von Thadden also relates, General Alfred Jodl, one of Hitler’s closest military advisors, similarly testified before the Nuremberg Tribunal about Germany’s “Barbarossa” attack: note 4

    “It was undeniably a purely preventive war. What we found out later on was the certainty of enormous Russian military preparations opposite our frontier. I will dispense with details, but I can only say that although we succeeded in a tactical surprise as to the day and the hour, it was no strategic surprise. Russia was fully prepared for war.”

    Von Thadden also reviews a series of articles in the German weekly Der Spiegel about Soviet plans, worked out by General Georgi Zhukov, to attack northern Germany and Romania in early 1941. Commenting on this, Colonel Vladimir Karpov has stated:

    “Just imagine if Zhukov’s plan had been accepted and implemented. At dawn one morning in May or June thousands of our aircraft and tens of thousands of our artillery pieces would have struck against densely concentrated enemy forces, whose positions were known down to the battalion level — a surprise even more inconceivable than the German attack on us.”

    After ZOG declared war on Hitler for reuniting East and West Prussia it was clear what the stakes were. USSR ZOG went on to invade Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Bessarabia. ZOG had barely been chased out of Spain. Hitler knew exactly what Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were up to. He had lived through the talmudic Versailles “treaty”, occupation, reparations, and Weimar. Kaufmans hit book “Germany must Perish” had already been written about in Time magaizine in March 1941. Hess flew into England in June before Barborosa to try to make some kind of deal.

  187. Lurker says:

    Occupying Malta makes it sound like a technicality, it may have turned out to be a very costly operation. Although initially we (the British) didn’t think it could be defended.

    Anyhow, correct, Malta is a strategic point in the Med which has been fought over and occupied multiple times in history for very good reasons.

  188. Lurker says:

    It is an undeniable and indisputable fact that Britain initiated the genocidal policy of aerial bombing, not the Germans- and this policy was subsequently adopted by the USAAF.

    Before the war both US and Britain planned for and began development of aircraft for heavy bombing for which there was no significant German equivalent. But the standard narrative has the Germans as the instigators of mass-bombing (while being too stupid to provide themselves with the means to execute it fully) contrasted with the Allies as reluctantly being forced to retaliate with bombing of their own and, luckily, having provided themselves with the means to do so. Which doesn’t really add up.

    Must also note the RAF and USAAF leadership were gung ho for the idea because they wanted to carve out a strategic, war winning role for themselves – to compete with the army and navy, rather than merely being a supporting arm of the military.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    , @Iris
  189. @Lurker

    Yes. It was Britain that initiated terror bombing (euphemistically called “area bombing”), not the Germans. Places like Warsaw were hardened, front-line targets that were ancillary to the main military operation, and hence legal targets (it was a siege operation). In contrast, the British and Americans bombed civilian centers far behind the front lines, these served no military purpose and were pure terror. The Germans only followed suit reluctantly after the British began these tactics. At least the British were honest enough to admit that they would be tried for war crimes if they lost, the Americans still think this shows off their “bravery” and martial prowess.

  190. Iris says:

    “Before the war both US and Britain planned for and began development of aircraft for heavy bombing for which there was no significant German equivalent”.

    Very correct. This is an undisputed historic fact.

    Mass bombing, as a strategic means to defeat a foe by hitting its “soft targets” and bombing the non-combatant part of the population was “invented” by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1920. The mass bombing of German civilians was the continuation of his crimes:

    “The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means within 45 minutes a full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no effective means of escape”. – Squadron Leader Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  191. Mulegino1 says:

    Good point. For anyone interested:

    Bombing Vindicated: A Survey of Recent Developments by This Leading Authority on Air Warfare 1944
    by J. M. Spaight

    Published in 1944 by a former British Principal Secretary of the Air Ministry, this book set out to justify the… saturation bombing of cities. It reveals that the tactic was initiated by the British in May 1940, and that Hitler opposed this concept and refused to retaliate for months while the German cities were bombed.

    The British bombers were designed to bomb cities, he said, while the “Teutonic mind” never even considered such a policy, and instead viewed an air force merely as a tool to “blast open” a path for attacking armies. The German air force, he pointed out, was never used for anything else until ordered to retaliate against the British campaign.

    “Whatever Hitler wanted or did not want, he most assuredly did not want the mutual bombing to go on. He had not wanted it ever to begin. He wanted it, having begun, to be called off. There was ample evidence that he did not want the latter kind of bombing to become the practice. He had done his best to have it banned by international agreement.”

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @Iris
  192. Iris says:

    Britain, under Churchill, was the first country to use mass bombing against civilian population in Iraq in 1920. But Churchill is know for having promoted the mass bombing of Germany as early as 1917

    “The Spectator” reports on Richard Overy’s book “The Bombing War”:

    Hitler didn’t start indiscriminate bombings — Churchill did
    Overy traces the origins of the bombing war back to 10 May 1940, the same day that Germany began its attack on the West and Churchill replaced Chamberlain as British prime minister. ‘Chamberlain had always opposed the use of bombing against urban targets,’ writes Overy, ‘but Churchill had no conscientious or legal objections.’ Indeed, already as Minister of Munitions in 1917, Churchill had been in favour of an independent air force and a policy of long-range bombing against German industrial targets.

    Little known too, Churchill used chemical weapons against Russian populations.

    In the Guardian:
    Winston Churchill’s shocking use of chemical weapons
    In the summer of 1919 [.. ] Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia. [..]
    A staggering 50,000 M Devices were shipped to Russia: British aerial attacks using them began on 27 August 1919, targeting the village of Emtsa, 120 miles south of Archangel. Bolshevik soldiers were seen fleeing in panic as the green chemical gas drifted towards them. Those caught in the cloud vomited blood, then collapsed unconscious.
    The attacks continued throughout September on many Bolshevik-held villages: Chunova, Vikhtova, Pocha, Chorga, Tavoigor and Zapolki

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  193. Anonymous [AKA "M.E.B."] says:

    Dear Mr Durocher,

    The desecration of the Jewish cemetery with the three words „Elsassiches schwarzen Wolfe“ contains 5 (five!) errors no less. In correct German it would read „Elsässische schwarze Wölfe“ (Funnily you even corrected one of the mistakes in your text). Definitely not the work of anybody with any more than just the most basic notion of German, whereas the „schwarze Wölfe“ are supposed to be of German-alsacian descent.

    Best regards


  194. Mulegino1 says:

    A joint German Spanish move on Gibratar was out of question after Franco’s adamant refusal during the Bayonne meeting

    True- but it appears that the traitorous Admiral Canaris- via surreptitious diplomatic channels- may have influenced Franco’s attitude towards a Spanish-German alliance, which Franco appears to have favored initially.

  195. Steve P says:

    Finkielkraut is a racist shit. “..from their mother’s milk” just like all the jews who supported that shit’s racist shit. And when hadms this shit Finkielkraut ever shed a tear for a priest killed by nazis? Or a Pole? Never. Finkielkraut is a racist xenophobic jewish shit and his kind have no place in France. Jews that stamd up against those who vilify the French and France for nazi crimes yes. Jews like Finkielkraut his supporters and those he supported no. Its not his country nor is it the country of those he supported nor is it the counrty of those who supported him and Macron is not the Preseident. Macron himself made it so by declaring a non elected member of the Venezuelan government president of Venezuela. That mscton serves jews and as those jews hates France abd hates the French is clear by Macron and tnose Jews support for genocidary regimes and the puppets like Guaido they seek to impose.
    How many Jews say “the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim” ? And how many said and say likewise of Ethnic and Catholic Poles?
    And what about the glaring parralel between Generalplan Ost and the jews Generalplan Mitte Ost that was hatched decades before? From victimhood propaganda to blatant lies to massacres and murders lied about and denied.
    And why has not a single Zionist, Rabbi, or Jew thanked Russia for defeating Germany so resoundedly ? Didn’t go quite as well and Germans and Jews had planned. Jews resent that too? We all know nazis do.
    As the Kaiser so the King as the King so the Nazi As the Nazi so the Jew genocidists are as genocidists do and that includes Israel too.

  196. Gg Mo says:
    @Thomm's Purple haired femiNAZI

    Wow, I just searched and they are out for blood , calling him a neo-nazi at every main stream media mention found. I am in the mid-west and heard nothing about him. Sharing !

  197. Lurker says:

    I took his comment to be ironic in intent.

  198. @Ralph B. Seymour

    This post was a joke. Please……

  199. Christo says:
    @c matt

    As noted : So neat that if it was real , they would have used correct Germanic script and all that.

    2 other things ,

    1.Using pink/purple fluorescent spray paint for such a group?Black Wolves? Got to be kidding

    2. Combined with a less “colorful” spray paint , IMO, somebody acting in the spirit of the “Black Wolves” would have used a sledge hammer. A “statement” not quickly washed off/propped back up in a couple hours..

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Guillaume Durocher Comments via RSS
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings