The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGuillaume Durocher Archive
French Writer Hervé Ryssen Jailed for Criticizing Jews
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The French identitarian writer and critic of Jewish power Hervé Ryssen was jailed on 18 September after having been found guilty of hate speech on three occasions. He has exhausted his right to appeal. He faces 17 months in jail and potentially more as he has other trials awaiting him.

Ryssen was found guilty of “insult, provocation, and public defamation due to origin, ethnicity, nationality, race, or religion.” In 2016, he was sentenced to 5 months in jail for passages in his books Understanding Judaism, Understanding Anti-Semitism. In 2017, he was sentenced to 6 months in jail for “anti-Semitic messages” on Twitter and Facebook.

In June 2018, Ryssen was sentenced to 1 year in jail, the maximum penalty, for a YouTube video entitled “The Jews, Incest, and Hysteria,” in which he explained why, in the judge’s words, “the Jews are an incestuous nation.” Evidently the judge was unmoved by the existence of numerous genetic clinics servicing Jews because of their propensity to various diseases as a historically in-bred population. Ryssen also had to give money to litigious ethnic lobbies, 2000 euros going to the National Bureau of Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism and 1000 euros for Lawyers Without Borders, France-Israel, and the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA, France’s SPLC).

Israel’s Billions: Jewish Crooks and International Financiers: How to Pick Money from the Goyim’s Pockets
Israel’s Billions: Jewish Crooks and International Financiers: How to Pick Money from the Goyim’s Pockets

In January 2020, Ryssen was also found guilty of “contesting the existence of crimes against humanity.”

Ryssen is the author of numerous books on Jewry, with titles like The Jewish Mafia, Israel’s Billions, and The Planetary Hopes. The dissident website Contre-Info wrote:

In a country in which 100,000 jail sentences have not been implemented, even as prisons are being emptied because of COVID-19, they are taking the decision, a political one, to lock up a patriotic writer.

Hervé Ryssen has studied political Judaism in several books – but evidently certain subjects do not suffer “blasphemy.” He was basically sentenced because of tweets and book covers, his writings (which include very many quotes of Jewish intellectuals) being unimpeachable except for the odd sentence. He has never produced revisionist writings regarding the official history of the Second World War, but he simply shared a cartoon on Facebook. But the big media who deign to mention his incarceration present him especially as a holocaust denier [négationniste].

All this comes even as the French political-media class has again celebrated Charlie Hebdo’s right to “blaspheme,” at least where the Christian and Muslim religions are concerned. Je Suis Charlie for thee, but not for me.

I have had no personal contact with Hervé Ryssen. He is remarkable for being both a European identitarian and a critic of Jewish power (in general, French activists tend to focus on one or the other issue). Despite himself being a racial nationalist, Ryssen has managed to keep good relations with the anti-Zionist civic nationalist Alain Soral and the mixed-race comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala.

Hervé Ryssen immortalized on the cover of Paris-Match, quite accidentally used as a symbol of the yellow-vest movement.
Hervé Ryssen immortalized on the cover of Paris-Match, quite accidentally used as a symbol of the yellow-vest movement.

Ryssen’s eloquence, erudition, and courage shine through in his videos. He greatly participated in the yellow-vest protests and witnessed their change in nature from a mass movement including ordinary Frenchmen and nationalists, to a leftover leftoid movement riven by anarchists and trade-union officialdom.

Ryssen is being incarcerated at Fleury-Mérogis just outside of Paris, the largest prison in Europe.

Ryssen cannot receive packages, but apparently is receiving numerous letters of support. A representative runs his Gab account and is providing updates on his situation.

Many prominent dissident personalities have denounced Ryssen’s imprisonment, including Jean-Marie Le Pen, Bruno Gollnisch, Alain Soral. Dieudonné M’Bala M’bala, Jean-Yves Le Gallou, Henry de Lesquen, Laurent Guyénot, and many others.

Marine Le Pen has however distanced herself from Gollnisch, who is still an official in her Rassemblement National, retweeting her former partner Louis Aliot saying “Freedom of speech does not authorize every provocation or obscenity . . . Gollnisch’s statements only concern himself.”

Perhaps surprisingly, the right-wing Zionist Gilles-William Goldnadel condemned Ryssen’s imprisonment, telling a Breton nationalist website:

I have the greatest contempt for Monsieur Ryssen and the feeling is mutual. But concerning criminal speech, nothing justifies him being in prison. But we are not in an American system in which anything can be said. We are in a European-style system where freedom of speech is framed by rules. For a time, I thought this system was possible but now I’m receding to the view that the best situation is that of the American system’s First Amendment.

The anti-Zionist civic nationalists at Égalité et Réconciliation were quick to denounce Goldnadel’s “duplicity” given that he has sued many people over the years for hate speech, including Roger Garaudy, Edgar Morin, Dieudonné, Robert Faurisson, Alain Soral, Jérôme Bourbon, Henry de Lesquen, Jean-Marie Le Pen, and . . . Hervé Ryssen. Indeed, Goldnadel is the founder of Lawyers Without Borders, which contributed to getting Ryssen sentenced to jail in 2018.

Finally, I must recall that in France explicit advocacy of French ethno-nationalism is illegal, but since February 2019 the French State considers that anti-Zionism (opposition to Jewish ethno-nationalism) is hate speech.

“It proves that the lobby doesn’t exist.”
“It proves that the lobby doesn’t exist.”

“Free Ryssen”

 
Hide 418 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rich says:

    This is disgusting. Whether one agrees with Ryssen or not, freedom of speech should be sacrosanct. Limiting free speech always results in tyranny. The French had better wake up soon, or they won’t be French anymore.

  2. songbird says:

    Lawyers Without Borders sounds like a very sinister organization, even without knowing anything else about it.

  3. Just another example of the utterly totalitarian nature of the “free” west. France isn’t even a country anymore. It’s just a pathetic okrug of the EUSSR. Lest any are inclined to boast here in Murika, the overlords will be removing the last vestiges of the 1st and 2nd amendments very soon – probably at the hands of “conservative” judges like Barrett (now with the Koch and US Chamber of Commerce Kosher Seal of Approval). Zeks who speak up will be renditioned off to never be seen again.

    China is more free than the French or German okrugs are. As long as you don’t get too uppity about Chairman Winny, the CCP, whine about the Uighurs or join Soros-sponsored agitation (as in Hong-Kong) they don’t much care what you say. Listening to media Neo-Clowns whine about the Chinese mistreatment of Muslim Uighurs is quite hilarious in light of the mountains of Muslim corpses left in the wake of their endless wars to make the world safe for Israel.

  4. TGD says:

    Reminds me of the treatment of Mordechai Vanunu, the Jewish nuclear scientist who spilled the beans about Israel’s nuclear bomb program. He was kidnapped from a foreign country by the Mossad and sentenced to 18 years in jail for treason, mostly spent in solitary confinement and under conditions of duress. He was released in 2004 but not permitted to leave Israel. He’s been arrested and jailed numerous times since his release and may still be in prison after a May, 2020 arrest.

    It doesn’t matter who or what you are. Criticize Jews, Judaism or the Zionist Entity and your goose is cooked.

    • Agree: Aristotle1, Moi
    • Thanks: Tom Welsh, DaveE, Pheasant
    • Replies: @Katrinka
    , @Steve De'ak
  5. neutral says:

    Even with news like this, you will find people here saying that countries like France being run by jews is a conspiracy theory.

  6. Keep us posted on anything French. History tap-dances, and the US might not be worth being the center of attention.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
  7. The French political, media and judiciary classes are in a strange position, trying to repress criticism of Israel and Jewish power on the one hand, and of Islam and Muslim immigrants on the other.
    This judiciary decision seems scandalous in terms of freedom of speech (and I now feel compelled to read H.Ryssen) as was the condemnation of Soral for sharing a fairly anodyne video which mentioned the Rothschilds.
    But as a French concerned with the future of my country, I am mostly worried about Muslims. The Jews were the archetype of the Stateless people, but now Israel is the country with the most traditional conception of nation sovereignty whereas the ruling elites of Western Europe and North America have all converted to globalism.
    French Jews were the first to flee the French suburbs because of Muslim criminality and hostility, but other Whites were not far behind. Objectively, our mutual interests do not seem that divergent. The change of mind by a right-wing Zionist Gilles-William Goldnadel is welcome and maybe an opportunity to engage with defenders of Jewish interests who don’t hate France (and haven’t yet left for Israel).

  8. Wow! Herve Ryssen another French intellectual jailed for speaking truth to power. Reading this t is telling about the unrestrained Zio Power that has turned France into a full on Fascist -Police-State.

    The number of French intellectuals and political leaders —-right-center-left—- that have been thrown into political internment in recent years for speaking out against their occupation by the unmentionables is truly revealing. It gives away the sorry state of affairs in France and much of Europe today.

    French slogans from their Grand Revolution Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité have been completely thrown into the waste bin of history. Now only used on Bastille Day as empty slogans for camouflage by France’s Zio ruling elite.

    Albeit France is under occupation again but who will come to liberate them this time ? Can’t be the US led Western Allies, as they have the same occupiers.

    At least the French, more so than the US,A have a good number of courageous intellectuals and political leaders that are willing to speak out and take the hit.

    Be careful what we say here, who knows maybe Macron and the Bureau of Police will make an extradition request.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @noname27
  9. While I obviously oppose his prison sentence, I have to say, Ryssen seems astonishingly careless. What’s up with that ridiculous “Les Milliards d’Israel” book cover? A cover like that virtually assures that the only people that will read it are the already converted (as well the usual anti-racism industry operatives).

    So France is an “unfree” country. Very well. Your choices essentially come down to either to learning to operate effectively within those confines (in the hopes of eventually loosening them) or to spend the rest of your days whining about it in obscurity. (Fuckwit-tier WNs overwhelmingly choose the latter option.)

    • Disagree: Tom Welsh
  10. @HyperDupont

    The change of mind by a right-wing Zionist Gilles-William Goldnadel is welcome and maybe an opportunity to engage with defenders of Jewish interests who don’t hate France (and haven’t yet left for Israel)

    I would reserve judgment on whether it’s a real change of mind.

    Personally, I think it’s more reflective of the Jewish ethic that has been described as ‘shoot and cry.’ First you do the dirty deed, and then you make a big show of contrition and lament the dark forces that made you act that way – eg vs the Palestinians, “Vy oh vy did vee haff to shoot zeese poor people, it iz so tragic!” In the meantime, of course, your opponent is either dead or rotting in prison.

    So Goldnadels’ supposed change of heart is best judged by his response to the next free speech crisis that flairs up in France, not by his consolatory statements today.

    • Agree: Aristotle1, annamaria
    • Replies: @Wielgus
    , @Ann Nonny Mouse
  11. France—-another “free” Western style Potemkin nation. Shoot, you can buy anything you want, you can do anything you want, you can run naked in public, you just can’t say or write what you want, which will soon turn into not being able to even think what you want, as soon as the authorities can determine what you’re thinking..Concerning this stuff, I noticed that the Yahoo politics site, closed down all comments with the hilarious reason given as being, to create a “safe” and engaging place for the free exchange of idea’s or some such baloney…LOL TOO FUNNY.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  12. France—-another “free” Western style Potemkin nation. Shoot, you can buy anything you want, you can do anything you want, you can run naked in public, you just can’t say what you want, which will soon turn into not being able to even think what you want, as soon as the authorities can determine what you’re thinking..

  13. lysias says:

    Would Voltaire now be put in jail in France for things that he said about the Jews?

  14. Franz says:

    Goldnadel is whistling in the dark here:

    “We are in a European-style system where freedom of speech is framed by rules. For a time, I thought this system was possible but now I’m receding to the view that the best situation is that of the American system’s First Amendment… “

    No it isn’t.

    The American system is devolving to its logical conclusion: In a few more years all platforms and avenues of political, cultural, and economic speech will be private. Once safely locked into the loving arms of the international plutocrats, the “American system” will be a memory, punctuated by a handful of Luddites who hung on to ancient mimeographs and pass out leaflets in the last remaining public parks. At best.

    • Replies: @Eagle Eye
  15. a few months in a Jewish dungeon

    can be a mind-clarifying experience.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  16. @silviosilver

    What’s wrong with that cover? So everyone can be represented in caricature, even Mohammad, but Jewish crooks and international financiers cannot?

  17. @HyperDupont

    The Jewish Zionists operate under the principle: “Ethnonationalism for me, globalism for thee”.

  18. @Rich

    Whether one agrees with Ryssen or not, freedom of speech should be sacrosanct.

    What’s there to agree or disagree with the truth? Either he was telling the truth or lying? I don’t know much about his work but it would seem that he wasn’t expressing an opinion but stating provable facts. The problem is that they are banning the truth, although I suppose “freedom of speech” includes legally peddling lies, and indeed most politicians, academics and the media are doing precisely that all the time and remain unpunished for it.

  19. Lot says:

    “ Despite himself being a racial nationalist, Ryssen has managed to keep good relations with the anti-Zionist civic nationalist Alain Soral and the mixed-race comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala.”

    Nothing remarkable at all that a Nazi, failed communist filmmaker, and a vulgar black rapper/invader of Europe/“comedian” get along.

    It is remarkable that someone as normally thoughtful as Durocher prefers these cosplaying friends of Islamic conquest of France over Marine Le Pen’s large and growing movement to stop it. She knows Zion is a strong friend and devastating foe.

  20. @Commentator Mike

    What’s wrong with that cover?

    It plays into every preconception normies have of “stupid anti-semites.” For all I know, every argument made in that book checks out (‘anti-semitic’ arguments usually do, after all), but what does that matter if no one is going to read it simply because they’re put off by the cover?

    Do you seriously not grasp this? Honestly, I find it incredible that I should have to spell this out.

    Let’s say his book had a moderate cover (and a more moderate subtitle), does that mean his enemies wouldn’t have been able to shut him up? Sadly, no. It’s perfectly possible they would still have succeeded. But (a) his own carelessness made it more likely they’d succeed, and (b) his own carelessness means fewer people will care that he is going to jail for presenting a political argument (he’s just a “dumb racist,” see).

  21. @Lot

    Zion is a strong friend and devastating foe

    Jeepers!

    We goyim better suck up & shut up!

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @Ugetit
  22. Herve Ryssen is the greatest living Frenchman.

    • Agree: Stan, Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @MMK
  23. Thomasina says:

    The founder of Lawyers Without Borders, an American:

    “Christina M. Storm, Founder

    Our founder & Executive Director from 2000-2019, Christina M. Storm, launched LWOB in 2000 to create a global association of lawyers committed to internationally oriented Pro Bono service and rule of law.”

    https://www.lawyerswithoutborders.org/about-us/leadership

    Another global association. I wonder, did Christina come up with this idea on her own?

  24. @Lot

    You actually want us “goyim to shut up and suck up.”

    My my my, Jew supremacists & their Christian Zionist errand boys aren’t usually quite so direct.

    Thanks for your candor.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  25. We don’t want 2 but Moses went up there and returned with 10. “We want Barabbas” and Barabbas was a thief. Isaiah was drawn and quartered. So much for the entitled people – He was to be stoned at Luke 4-4????

  26. What’s good for the gander obviously it is good only for the gander in France! So if anyone insults other faiths that would be covered under the “freedom of expression” as Mr Macaroni has said it!

  27. Exile says: • Website

    Marine Le Pen has however distanced herself from Gollnisch

    Marine Le Pen has proven herself a contemptible cuck for this and numerous other reasons.

    Her father deserves better.

    Site hasbarist Lot’s endorsement of Marine above tells you all you need to know. She has sold her birthright and family name for 30 pieces.

    • Thanks: Pheasant
  28. Scary. This IS coming to the US very soon, It has to. The Jews – the most powerful ethnic group in the West = are in a race against the knowledge of who they are, Free speech is only as good as the knowledge upon which speech depends. Post war Jewry had a lock on that knowledge base. Boomers like myself grew up being spoon fed philosemitism. There were critics of Jews but, hell, I didn’t even know who William Pierce was until 5 or 6 years ago. Now that has changed with the net. Most whites are still semitized but the truth about Jews is emerging= albeit slowly. Free speech is how white people who have been shorn of our traditional wisdom – such as it was – about Jews will ultimately find out about the Jews. The Jews have to stop it.

    • Agree: Ralph B. Seymour
  29. Bob Gwen says:

    What the hell does this guy think he’s doing?! Everyone knows that freedom means you can do anything, … EXCEPT NEVER EVER SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT THE JEWS!

  30. @silviosilver

    Authors generally have no control over a book’s cover and often not even over the title.

    • Replies: @Aristotle1
  31. @Lot

    Protestants say they are all about the Bible, so why don’t they pay attention to this verse?

    “You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

    If Jesus declared Jews who did not believe in him to be the sons of the Devil, then it’s an arrant absurdity from a Christian perspective to believe they are still the “Chosen People”. To faithful Christians as opposed to Judeophile cultists, Jews are, at best, in the same category as Muslims, which is to say, they are inimical infidels.

  32. Ghali says:

    In contrast, anti-Muslim bigots and Islamophobes have made their lucrative careers attacking Muslims and Islam. One would be promoted and supported if one attack Muslims and uses hate speech attacking and denigrating Muslims and Islam. What a criminal hypocrisy and overt racism against Muslims.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • Replies: @Ogmios
  33. Wally says:
    @Rich

    Those like Ryssen are arrested because their views cannot be refuted.
    The simple fact is that truth is “hate” to those who hate the truth.

    More on Hervé Ryssen, aka: Hervé Lalin here:

    Hervé Lalin / Hervé Ryssen Jailed in France for Engaging in Free Speech:
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13510&p=98797&hilit=Ryssen#p98797
    exc,:

    The court convicted Lalin / Ryssen for a series of antisemitic postings on Facebook and Twitter, as well as for a video he published on YouTube in 2018 — called “The Jews, Incest and Hysteria” — in which he attacked Jews as a “people of incest.”
    A book-length screed by Lalin — published in 2018 and titled “Antisemitism Without Complexity or Taboo” — was condemned for ‘denying the truth of the Nazi Holocaust’, a criminal offense in France.

    recommended:
    Official list of Revisionist scholars persecuted / imprisoned for questioning the “Holocaust”
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12642&p=98798

    • Thanks: Richard B
  34. Bill P says:

    I have a tender heart for the common French. I hope they are doing alright now, but I wonder.

    Jews don’t really concern me that much these days. Whatever side they align themselves with there will be unpleasant consequences for them. The only place they flourished over the last couple millennia was Christendom. They won’t be able to adapt to its absence.

    A year or so ago I met a young Frenchman from Marseille at work. He was headed to Alberta to work in the oilfields. Very nice young veteran who was despondent about what had happened to his city. He missed his flight and I offered him some practical help. Bought him a bit of food and found him a place to stay.

    He was such a hale young man that it gave me hope for France. How could a country dispense with such quality people? It can’t. Things will turn around.

    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @Aristotle1
  35. Ogmios says:
    @songbird

    Don’t you remember the old song by Warren Zevon? “Send Lawyers, Guns and Money/ the s**t has hit the fan”. I’m sure it was meant to sound intimidating within the context of that song. Lol

  36. Wally says:
    @Lot

    – There is nothing that Zionists like Lot hate more than a ‘person of color’ who rejects their ridiculous, hateful lies.
    Free Speech Activist Dieudonné M’bala M’bala Receives Human Rights Award / Is Then Sentenced To Prison: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9948

    Poor Lot speaks of Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, but cannot refute Dieudonne’s debunking of the fake “holocaust”.
    https://www.unz.com/article/living-under-the-french-hate-speech-laws/#comment-2031428
    and:
    French comic Dieudonne at Europe rights court over Robert Faurisson: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9904
    Forbidden to Laugh, By David Merlin : https://codoh.com/library/document/3788/?lang=en

  37. @Haxo Angmark

    On the bright side, since France’s prisons are full of moslems, he might become a bit of a folk hero in the Big House.

    • Replies: @dotmpe
    , @anonymous
  38. @Rich

    From the article:

    I have the greatest contempt for Monsieur Ryssen and the feeling is mutual. But concerning criminal speech, nothing justifies him being in prison. But we are not in an American system in which anything can be said.

    See there? The French still have a sense of humor after all.

    • LOL: Richard B
  39. Alfred says:
    @HyperDupont

    and haven’t yet left for Israel

    As soon as things heat up for Israel, they will be back. You can be sure of it. 🙂

  40. Make a list of everyone involved in the prosecution: the Procureur, the judge, and any lawyer who participated. Put it on freenet (so it can’t be taken down) and/or on an onion site.

    When people decide they’ve had a gutful and there is a genuine endogenous regime change, such lists will be very useful. (As the people from Hosni-hotep’s mukhabarat discovered to their great misfortune, downtrodden people can nurse a grudge for a generation).

    Lists of this type were very useful after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, when the opportunity arose for disgruntled commoners to take matters into their own hands. Apparatchiki and stukachi who thought that the system gave them impunity forever, spent the post-dissolution period listening for creaks in the night.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Thanks: PetrOldSack
    • Replies: @Ugetit
  41. Vojkan says:
    @HyperDupont

    Ask yourself who rules the “ruling elites of Western Europe and North America”. Who invited the muslims en masse into France? Who gave them impunity when their victims were native French? Every ill from which today France suffers originates in the “chosen” tribe.

    • Agree: Buck Ransom
  42. @silviosilver

    Agreed, a more moderate cover would have saved him a lot of trouble.

    Some suggestions :


    [MORE]

    and the classic :

    What has happened to the famous Jewish sense of humor?

    • Thanks: DaveE
    • LOL: Vojkan, Thim
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    , @karel
    , @karel
    , @Wally
  43. Vojkan says:
    @Lot

    Zionism is the cancer. You don’t fight cancer by cosying up to it. Pandering to those who hate you will never earn you their love, only their scorn in addition to their hatred. Pandering to those who hate you will also earn you the scorn of those who used to love you. In the end you will be left with no-one.
    Marine has no courage. That’s why she’ll never be president.

  44. Vojkan says:
    @lysias

    Voltaire’s taste for provocation did earn him sojourns at the Bastille then. So it would most probably earn him sojourns at Fleury-Mérogis today.

    • Agree: PetrOldSack
  45. @silviosilver

    Do you seriously not grasp this?

    I just meant to defend the art of caricature which seems to be under attack by the PC culture. I wasn’t thinking whether it is out of place on the cover of a book such as this. Serious publications often use caricatures to parody and satirise their intended targets, including the New York Times which published this cartoon:

  46. gotmituns says:

    the French are fags. they laid down and kissed the bottom of the German’s
    boots from 1940-45 and have never become real men again.

    • Disagree: Thim
    • Troll: Ugetit, Alfred
  47. I am now in the process of devouring his work, if anyone else would like to join me, you can find quite a lot at archive.org: https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Herve%20Ryssen%22

    • Agree: Ugetit
    • Thanks: Frankie P
    • Replies: @Frankie P
    , @Ugetit
    , @Katrinka
  48. GMC says:

    No Freedom without the Truth – and the Zionists are at War with these two words , not to mention their real wars . No one seems to shoot back and this is the real problem.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  49. @Lot

    #19

    Nothing remarkable at all that a Nazi, failed communist filmmaker, and a vulgar black rapper/invader of Europe/“comedian” get along

    You and the Zio ruling elite are not getting it. The Right (nationalists), Centrists, Left and even immigrants are all part of a collective humanity seeking a just world based on morality with universal ethics that must include freedom and dignity for all. They will work out their problems in a sane and peaceful manner.

    But, their uncovering their real common enemy instead of fighting one another is heartening that their may still be hope for humanity.

    • Thanks: Iris
  50. Wielgus says:
    @silviosilver

    Up to the Lebanon war of 1982 the Israelis made a big thing of the “purity of the gun” – ie. they didn’t shoot anyone without good reason. I didn’t notice them saying this so much after that year, though.

  51. insult, provocation, and public defamation

    insult

  52. Tom Welsh says:

    Clearly the French – like the Germans, the Austrians and many others – lack the concept of free speech.

  53. Tom Welsh says:
    @lysias

    Voltaire had to flee France in his own lifetime – although admittedly more for things he said about the monarchy and the nobility.

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  54. Gilles-William Goldnadel has not been paying attention to events in the USA. Referring to that countries freedom of speech and the First Amendment as a preferred option for France shows a distinct ignorance of the facts in play.

    • Replies: @anon
  55. @Rich

    This is the reality of the so called west.

  56. @songbird

    All NGOs are founded by special interest groups or 3 letter agencies.

    • Agree: Aristotle1
  57. @Tom Welsh

    Doesn’t that mean Jews are akin to modern day monarchs and nobles.

    The unspeakable and untouchables.

    And yes I meant all the meanings of both words.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Aristotle1
  58. dotmpe says:
    @Mr McKenna

    Joking I’m sure. In real life, moslism are simple reserve jews. Nothing more, nothing less. Their particular branch of mental abberation only serves to keep them unaccountable.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @PetrOldSack
  59. @Dr.C. Fhandrich

    Or as yahu finance has it:

    “Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting.”

    = We want you to connect and be a community, so shut up!

    • Replies: @Dr.C. Fhandrich
  60. @GMC

    If you want to shoot back, go to unGoogle.us

  61. @Ray Caruso

    Not a good argument…authors normally do have such control and they are certainly responsible. Having said this, the cover does not look “illegal” to me and it should not be deemed such unless it breaches obscenity laws.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  62. @Astuteobservor II

    They always have been an imperial elite…. See Benjamin Ginsburg’s The Fatal Embrace

    http://mailstar.net/tribes.html

    http://mailstar.net/dostoievsky.html

  63. @Bill P

    Don’t worry about our Jewish cousins. They will get along just fine.

    • Replies: @Bill P
  64. noname27 says: • Website
    @neutral

    “RF = Republic Francaise = Rothschild Freres (Brothers).”

    — Le Canard enchaine, 1969

    Macron is a Rothschild rent boy sock puppet.

  65. noname27 says: • Website
    @Tommy Thompson

    The EUSSR is Communist. Germany under Merkel is Communist – she hates German Nationalists (Fascists). France is Communist under Macron – he hates French Nationalists (Fascists). Wake up.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  66. noname27 says: • Website
    @Vojkan

    She’s controlled opposition, that’s why. Same with AFD in Germany and Wilders in Holland.

    • Agree: PetrOldSack
  67. Frankie P says:
    @Streisandfx

    What an excellent archive. The first video, The Jewish Question, with English subtitles, is a brilliant video that I watched at least five times on YouTube before it was taken down. Ryssen represents everything that the (((organized community))) hates and fears: a based, highly educated goy who has studied the Jew and his history deeply and in the words of Jewish historians. He is a French nationalist who understands that the Jews are the root of the disenfranchisement of his people, the French people, and he insists on talking about it publicly and producing media to make others aware. In that way he is like Soral, as both are extremely prolific and articulate. Hasbarist Lot and his lot love to attack these guys, ad hominem, but they never try to refute the arguments. In addition, Americans and UNZ readers should be aware of how many books Soral and Ryssen have sold, and how many times their videos have been seen.

  68. Ugetit says:
    @Pat Kittle

    We goyim better suck up & shut up!

    And pay up too. May as well drop our drawers and bend over while we’re at it.

  69. geokat62 says:

    Finally, I must recall that in France explicit advocacy of French ethno-nationalism is illegal, but since February 2019 the French State considers that anti-Zionism (opposition to Jewish ethno-nationalism) is hate speech.

    As I’ve repeatedly pointed out, in response to the events during WWII, Jewish Supremacist Organisations developed the following formulation:

    ethno-nationalism => fascism => genocide

    To ensure Never Again!, the most that Westerners can aspire to is a country based on the principle of civic-nationalism.

    As a result, “blood and soil” is out and “multiculti” is in.

    So, never forget, goy, Diversity Is A Strength!

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  70. Ugetit says:
    @Kratoklastes

    Make a list of everyone involved in the prosecution…

    Impeccable idea and speaking of lists, we must record all the atrocities committed against the goyim, sparing no details but not embellishing them as advocated by the power thirsty, drunken, indebted, war criminal Churchill who was obviously under the illusion that such things were a one way street when he recommended just such a course in his letter to Stalin of Oct 13, 1943.

    After yapping hysterically and mendaciously about German “atrocities,” he writes to his heartthrob, Stalin,

    Lists will be compiled in all possible detail…[so that those Germans who participate in “atrocities” (such as defending themselves)]…will know that they will be brought back, regardless of the expense to the scene of their crimes and judged on the spot by the peoples whom they have outraged…for the Allied Powers will pursue [the “guilty”]to the uttermost ends of the earth and will deliver them to their accusers in order that justice may be done.

    I don’t often agree with that hypocritical, crackpot, corpulent sack of scum but I agree with the concept for the future while regretting that it hadn’t been applied to him and his.

    • Thanks: John Regan
    • Replies: @Astaroth
  71. @songbird

    Most anything appended with “Without Borders” is very sinister. Ditto for most anything in a college catalog appended with “Studies”.

    • LOL: PetrOldSack
    • Replies: @Ogmios
  72. Sokrates says:
    @Rich

    Sure we have freedom of speech if the jew agrees with us.
    Otherwise in the big house.

  73. Ugetit says:
    @geokat62

    … “blood and soil” is out and “multiculti” is in.

    You are correct of course and I wonder how long before that concept is conveniently reversed.

  74. Ogmios says:
    @Ghali

    Sir, while I agree with you that prejudice against Muslims is wrong, please don’t play that silly “Muslim-haters are racists” game. I get too much of that from some leftwingers here in America. There are members of many different races who are Muslim. Islam is a religion. It has never, ever been a race or ethnic group of any kind. Thanks for your comment and take care.

    • Replies: @Sirius
  75. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:

    Shut up and die already

  76. Ogmios says:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Obviously Lawyers Without Borders patterned their name after the older and better-known Doctors Without Borders aka Médecins Sans Frontières. Are you implying that you also find Doctors Without Borders to be “sinister”? Just wondering.

  77. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    Goldnadel, a Yid for Yid.
    If it is good, it is for Yid.

    1st Amendment only for Yid.

    Ask NYT or CNN (ChitNotNews)
    or any publisher of books.

  78. “I tried to warn you.” –Funny Mustache Man

    • Replies: @Rurik
  79. Stan says:
    @Rich

    The only speech permitted in France, US and UK is speech approved by Jews.

  80. Z-man says:

    Libérez Hervé Ryssen, MAINTENANT !!!

    To the French:
    “If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    ― George Orwell

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  81. I do not who Hervé Ryssen is but I will add my voice to the chorus to free him… infringement of the freedom of speech anywhere on this planet must be verboten, even if it offends the God, let alone the Jewry!

  82. @silviosilver

    Hide in plain sight. No more Solzhenitsyns gdamit. What a punk.

  83. Ugetit says:
    @Streisandfx

    Thanks for that. A ton of good stuff by him there. While I do not entirely agree with him here,

    Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as they are sick people to be cured.

    -Herve Ryssen, Psychopathology of Judaism (2007), p. 7

    https://archive.org/stream/PsychopathologyOfJudaism/Psychopathology%20of%20Judaism_djvu.txt

    he doesn’t sound like enough of a threat to lock him up. Not even close. Which goes to show how hysterical and outrageous they are, and that they will end up being their own worst enemies.

    One reason I disagree with his concept of curing them is that I do not think they want a cure, nor is it our place or ability to provide such even if they did. Situations like that are analogous to becoming educated in the sense that education is an active process and one cannot be educated, especially against one’s will.

    Another reason that I do not promote a cure is that we goyim obviously need the constant irritation provided by the eternal parasites (both goy and non-goy) to get us moving. Besides, we apparently need to neutralize the dimwits among ourselves long before thinking of curing the other guy. If not altogether hopeless, it’s obviously a glacial process at best.

  84. France, however historically important & still powerful in many areas, is becoming a joke- along with UK- because of its anti-national policy of oppressing their own people as such. No country has ever survived if they favored racial or ethnic minorities at the expense of its core, fundamental people.

    This guy should never be in jail for whatever he said or wrote about any ethnic or racial group.

    And, that said- this guy is an idiot. French Jews are not a threat to France, unlike hordes or Africans & Arab (and other) Muslims, and this moron fails to see it. Cognitive dissonance at its height.

    London, I think, is less than 50% white, let alone English. Moscow, on the other hand, is 93% Russian.

    Nuff’ said.

  85. Saggy says:

    What is extraordinary is that the Jews are openly planning for the execution of all Christians as is amply documented in the vid below, and at the same time able to control what can be said about them in the US as well as France.




    This just doesn’t make any sense at all.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  86. @Achilles Wannabe

    For all its faults, the US Constitution even today guarantees a large measure of two freedoms which are unknown in almost all other countries: freedom of speech, and freedom to bear arms. If our civilization should survive to write histories of our times in the future, these will surely be reckoned the lost American Republic’s greatest achievements, similar to how our own histories remember the peace of Augustus in the lost Roman Empire.

    Sadly, you’re probably right that this won’t last much longer in these incipient dark ages. Still, the fact that they have survived inasmuch as they have, for as long as they have, is something for Americans to be proud of.

    To M. Ryssen, who lives under another system, I can only give my sympathies, and my admiration for his willingness to stand up for the truth where the truth is a crime.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  87. anon[141] • Disclaimer says:

    Meanwhile in USA , we see anti semitism is rising because same one mixed the following ingredients in to the new Jewish bowl and printed these words- “Ginsburg was a reassuring presence as anti semitism rose”-NYTimes

    The ingredients-
    1 Disney asked children in the winter what the wishes for Santa clause were including to the Jewish children. ( Did the child wear any distinctive mark ?) .
    2 Trump saying “ we are saying Merry Christmas again” against the “war on Christmas”
    3Guardian (UK) without offering any proof claimed RB Ginsburg abandoned Judaism at 17 when she discovered the females were excluded from men only minyan ( which one is false ? Claim of leaving Judaism part [ then we should prevent anyone from speculating if anyone left any religion ] or mentioning the the exclusion part or the actual exclusion part ? )
    4 Guardian changed the language to : “She remained deeply committed to her Jewish identity ”
    5″The controversy however left me with a question : What does it mean to be a Jewish in America ? And what specially does it mean to be Jewish right now “?
    6 “In the days of Donald Trump — an era that has brought us rising incidents of anti-Semitism, and the Tree of Life massacre — she was a bulwark.”
    7 “Jewish values run through her writings like a shining thread. If you’ve been excluded, you fight for inclusion. If you’ve been made to feel less-than, because of your gender or your sexual orientation or your race or your religion, you stand up for others who’ve been denied a seat at the table. The notion of tikkun olam, “
    8 -“a president who has allegedly complained about Jewish clannishness and ingratitude for everything he’s done for Israel, which, by the way, is the country to which he seems to think our primary allegiance lies”.

    9 ” From what I can tell, Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn’t want to. She might not have been a regular at synagogue or at Sisterhood meetings, but she lived a Jewish life.

    She was, for starters, a mensch, a boss who treated her clerks like family, serving them birthday cakes (that her husband baked) and helping them find partners”.

    OPINION
    The Very Jewish R.B.G.
    Jennifer Weiner https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/opinion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-jewish.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

    [MORE]

    Lets unpack. some are easy some are difficult because some ideas informed by her words in NYTimes are convoluted :

    Ginsburg did not think its important to serve those values by replacing herself with someone ideologically similar but age wise dissimilar .It was important for her to be on the Supreme Court and continue ( NYTimes 26th 2020 page 1 Susan Dominus and Charles Savage )

    Ginsberg did not allow a thought of exclusion of Palestinian ,Muslims,and Christians when she accepted the award from Israel. ( but this author Jennifer Weiner as a Jew, I am devastated that we won’t have Justice Ginsburg as our advocate and role model” and never mentions these in her article )

    The convoluted ones are deep recurring ,malleable ,and allow the blinds to get mixed up and the charlatan to abuse .

    Author has a personal idea abut Judaism . Dies she has have a personal definition of anti -semitism? Or does she borrow that from the crowd who finds Anti -zionsim aka Anti- Israelism is Antisemitism?
    Does her definition of Judaism has overlapping domains with other religions or with any non -religious views ? Does one shred Judaism or shred all religions’s core values and core ideas of a lot of atheists when one ignores justice equality ,harasses the religious practices and makes fun of ethnic dress, culinary habits and chooses to treat the citizen differently based on religion history geography or ethnicity ? Does religion allow one to pick and choose or and just choose his or her religion in the most consequential moment ? Is expressing doubt seined thigh or plain abhorrence at those allowed in the discussion of someones life history or critical reviews of achievements”

    She does let the cat out .She lets us know:”I can’t answer for R.B.G. But most Jews will tell you that a Jewish identity has little to do with whether you keep kosher or attend services every Friday, and everything to do with your culture, your ethnicity; with the way you see the world and the way the world sees you. It is an identity we can’t slip, even if we want to.”. Does this culture include ADL,JINSA,AIPAC,FDD and Stand with Israel on Florida license plate ? Does this culture include
    occupation, stealing the harvest, killing the children ,making separate ugly dangerous roads fro
    Palestinian ,expelling residents and denying citizenship to Arabs ? Does this ethnicity include persons identified as “self hating jews” who don’t hate “selves ” but Israeli polices?
    Does the identity of a muslim or a Hindu depend on how the world sees her/him ? Does disbelieving the alleged attitude of other or researching the alleged attitude of other become anti semetism ? Will that rules be applied to Hindus Muslims or Christians?

    For number 8 : Yes allegiance lies to Israel and its primary .Otherwise the critics of Chuck Hagel like Kristol wouldn’t have got away with his mean crude nasty attack on Hagels’ American priority . Letting the world know taht US policy on mE would be dictated by Israel (GOP presidential and non -presidential office candidates) Otherwise media and Democrats would have lashed out at the transfer of embassy, proposing the preposterous deal of a century ,allowing Israel annexation and letting g Israel claim Golan Heights and letting Israel mount attack on Iran and Syria- and the is the limited history after 2017.

    For the number 9 above – this is the answer : it’s not so uncommon and mundane practice but it becomes exemplary when a Jewish person does it !

  88. sally says:
    @Rich

    How do you say Assange in French? Welcome to the Bankster controlled Nation State system.. everywhere it is the same.. they impose copyright and patent laws and give the monopolies those laws create to their friends.
    The major global markets are composed of corporations whose balance sheets represent 90% intangible asset and 10% tangible that change since 1955 where the ration was 14% intangible and 86% tangible.. This switch explains the growing divide in wealth between the haves and the have nots. and in France the power that goes with that wealth seems to be controlling.

    • Thanks: PetrOldSack
  89. Ugetit says:

    It seems as the Anti-Truth movement has its tentacles all over the world. Here’s an example from the other side of the globe,

    SEOUL (AFP) – A South Korean professor who challenged the consensus view …

    was found guilty of defamation for questioning the popular …

    … she suggested the reality was more complex, with some women volunteering – though without necessarily knowing what their eventual fate would be. Many were told that they would get factory jobs.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/south-korean-academic-convicted-of-defaming-comfort-women

    Lesson; never, ever question the standard stories and heaven forbid, avoid suggesting that the truth is a bit more nuanced!

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  90. @Commentator Mike

    When Ernst Zundel was sentenced in Canada the judge said something to the effect that the truth of what he said about the Holocau$t™ was irrelevant as the very act of denying it is a crime. A sort of crazed logic to that.

    • Replies: @Wally
  91. Rurik says:
    @Rich

    Limiting free speech always results in tyranny. The French had better wake up soon, or they won’t be French anymore.

    Sieg Heil!

    When have we heard that (卐) stuff before?

    Don’t you mean they won’t be *White* ‘French anymore’?

    Didn’t France fight a second World War to end that kind of vile racism?!?!

    Isn’t that the kind of Nazism that the good Jews of France are trying to end? Isn’t that why all people of good will repeat the mantra Never Again! Because of sentiments like yours, ‘won’t be (White) French anymore?

    Why is it always the Jews, (like the Jewish former French president Sarkozy),

    that have to point out why France MUST stop being White French, or they won’t survive!

    We’ve all been down this tiresome road before. We all know the menace that faced us all in the last century. Nazism, fascism, White nationalism, White supremacy, Donald Trump, Les Deplorables, KKK, and on and on..

    This is why BLM has to burn down our racist cities, in order to show why White lives no longer matter, because they’re White! Duh!

    White = racist.

    Duh!!!

    Haven’t we learned anything?!

    If you love life, and love truth, then you’ll support Israel. The shining light unto all nations. And STOP being racist, and talking about how the French (WE ALL KNOW YOU MEAN WHITE French!!!), need to persevere, as White!

    That is pure Nazism and racism and hate!

    Stop hating, for once!

    And mix it up!

    Diversity is (((our))) strength!!!

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  92. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr McKenna

    If he is lucky, he will repudiate whatever godless cesspool (atheism, christianity…) he presently wallows in, and will simply revert to the true monotheism of Islam.

    He can always hope. 😀

  93. Rurik says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    “I tried to warn you.” –Funny Mustache Man

    Exactly!

    The French get off on themselves over their eternal moral superiority over the German people.

    They positively gush at every opportunity to rub Germany’s nose in it, generation after generation.

    Well, Frenchy, take a good look at what you’ve wrought with your sanctimonious, self-righteous ‘superiority’.

    You’ve destroyed France (just as the Brits have destroyed England), its future, and any hope for your children and grandchildren, out of envy and spite.

    And all so you could preen and strut and wax morally superior to Germans.

    Here’s a clue: The only thing that will ever turn things around in France, is when the French people grow the balls to say openly that Hitler was right, and that International Jewish supremacism has every intention of racially blending every last French (and British and Swedish and so on…) man, woman and child off the planet. (at least the ones they can’t slaughter outright in (((their))) endless wars).

    It’s either Hitler, (and France [and England and the US…] fought on the wrong side of that war)..

    ..or Mix it up!

    Take your pick, France.

  94. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @dotmpe

    In real life, moslism are simple reserve jews

    Yes, that is a standard refrain by pagan godless lowlifes here. I see you are one of them. But, it simply does not pass the logic test.

    Except for some ritual similarities like, circumcision, kosher/halal slaughter, shared Prophets of God, etc., the core differences are immense.

    Now, consider the Judenism and Chrizzism faiths, the 2 core faiths of the whitey world. Both of them follow the same accursed pagan “in-his-image” spiritual abominations. Basically, “god” as a man-like being(s), quite similar to hindooism, buddhism, etc. All based on hearsay. Batshit crazy stuff, I tell you.

    Islam utterly rejects such accursed abominations. It stands alone in an ocean of Godlessness.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • Replies: @John Regan
    , @dotmpe
  95. @gotmituns

    That’s not as simple as that : quite a good number especially in the countryside and in the distant provinces had concluded, already, mostly under the pressure of traditional catholic teaching (not fascism), that Jewish finance and Jewish-managed workers’ unions were the two main dangers and that being part of the German Empire was preferable to being part of the Anglo-Jewish empire and to being part of the future soviet empire, though it was far from ideal. After the disaster of Mers el Kebir where the whole French fleet was scuttled by the British many concluded that Britain was the foe as it had been during most historical past. Those who resented the Germans were mostly to be found in the urban regions where the traditional catholic mentality no longer prevailed, where the German food rationing was more stringent and where you had to go to work in Germany as soon as you were out of work. Most of the urban French bourgeoisie like today identified with their money which was to be made through some form of European union preferably led by Germany.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @gotmituns
  96. @neutral

    It’s a conspiracy theory to say that jews have disproportionate power. Never mind that TPTB will destroy your life and throw you in jail if you even make the assertion. Nope, nothing fishy there

  97. Polemeros says:

    Despite having been raised and having lived in a very liberal environment, I eventually realized, with pain, that certain groups of people are simply unable to live together without making each other miserable, sooner or later.

    One group must clearly dominate the other. Any detente is temporary and mere appearance.

    Separation is their only future.

    Blacks and Whites.

    Europeans and Jews.

  98. Trinity says:

    The White man is being bullied by people who look like Woody Allen. Think about that for a second. IF Whites would stick together like every other sane race on this planet, we wouldn’t be in the position we find ourselves in now. Last time someone told me what I could say or not say, I think I might have been 5 years old. Think about that for a second. The Jew is now your adopted daddy, White man.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @DaveE
  99. @Commentator Mike

    Michele Renouf, while defending Faurisson, Zundel, and others, referred to this as gaoling (jailing) opinions. Whether it is the truth or false becomes irrelevant, because it is an opinion.

  100. This is a terrible news. I’ve red all Ryssen’s book and all its content are said in common sens, objectivity and demonstrated. In addition his main reference comes from the Tora. All what he said is in the tora or has been mentioned by other jews. Just by readin Maurice Samuel, Rabbi meir Kahane, Arthur Koestler and many more other defending israel, one will be disgust to vomiting by seeing how bad, how dangerous, how evil these guys are.

  101. @Ray Caruso

    To faithful Christians as opposed to Judeophile cultists, Jews are, at best, in the same category as Muslims, which is to say, they are inimical infidels.

    True. Lost today, is that included the Old Testament in his bible translation solely for the purpose of showing what the Jews did wrong. The New Testament is the only thing that mattered. That is why Playmobile was accused of Auntie Shem-itism, over the Luther toy.

  102. @Francis Miville

    I have no direct knowledge of this, but I in the 70s I met a few Normans who said French farmers did quite well under German occupation, as they received fair prices for what they produced, and had few restrictions other than food quality placed on them.

  103. gotmituns says:
    @Francis Miville

    Well said sir, I bow to your reasoning. I will add, the only French that actually took part in the real fighting on the eastern front were the SS division, Charlamaign, final defenders of central Berlin, wiped out almost to the last man. Those Frenchmen have/had nothing to be ashamed of.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  104. anon[108] • Disclaimer says:

    FUKUS has long been run by Jews and they are here to fuck us. It’s what they’re put on this earth for. Jews never know when to quit. Even after they have all the power and all the money in the world, they will still be besieged by paranoia.

    Come to think of it, the implosion of FUKUS through decadence and societal collapse might just be the best thing for the world.

    • Agree: Zarathustra
  105. Dutch Rob says:

    You get Flak when your over the target.

  106. Wielgus says:
    @Z-man

    Also falsely attributed to Voltaire.
    I am not aware of Orwell writing this and I have read most of his work. A reference for the quote would be nice. Regardless of the authenticity of attribution, the actual statement is quite correct. Politicians and others have had their careers destroyed for criticising Israel.

    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  107. @Saggy

    Their intention is to kill only the Catholics and traditional Christians while accepting Evangelists as Noachides : since the latter don’t believe in Holy Trinity they are Jews for Jesus by all practical purposes and even though the Talmud is very anti-Jesus (actually they rather say that the Jesus as imagined by Christians never existed and all that there was was a preacher using Egyptian magic to gather audiences and get rich quickly) most Jews do appreciate Jesus as the main guy who destroyed the goys’ pagan religions like they are proud of Marx who is the main one to have succeeded in destroying the goys’ properties. But Anglo-Saxons have been good at killing and enslaving Catholics currying for the applause of Jews since Henry VIII.

  108. Katrinka says:
    @TGD

    Not if EVERYBODY criticizes. How can (((they))) jail everybody?

    • Agree: DaveE
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @TRM
  109. It is not just France, the ZUS is almost as bad, just try criticizing the zionists and other than a few sites, the comment will not be allowed and Pence even said that criticizing zionists will not be tolerated , they rule over us, they control our money with their FED, we are their slaves.

    Nathan Rothschild infamously said; I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England, for the man who controls the money supply controls the British empire and I am that man.

    It is the same here in the ZUS, with their privately owned FED.

    • Agree: noname27
  110. TKK says:

    But we are not in an American system in which anything can be said

    That’s a good one.

  111. @Achilles Wannabe

    To both Achilles and John Regan –
    That’s right – just hand it over. Everything the European race has lost of the world dominance it once had is because it just handed it over! Gave it away! Argue against that if you can … you can’t. And YOU self-styled White Nationalists are still doing it!

    Makes me sick.

    Achilles: “This IS coming to the US very soon, It has to.”
    John Regan: “Sadly, you’re probably right that [our constitutional rights] won’t last much longer in these incipient dark ages.”
    You’re both primed and ready. This is what you call intelligence, or being “clued in.”

    And there’s plenty more similar comments in this thread. There is no fight in the White man. He is more than ready to collapse. The only cure that I can see, and I believe this wholeheartedly, is 100% HITLERISM. The key ingredient of Jewish power is making ‘Whites’ afraid of that, willing to go along with anti-nazism. And who do you white assholes blame for that? Hitler, that’s who you blame!

    You fancy you’re beyond Hitler because you’ve come after him in historical time. But of course you are not; Hitler was among the greatest of white men. The enemy has caused you to choke on such words. But read the essence of his worldview, as expressed in Mein Kampf, in my running synopsis of Vol. 2 beginning here: https://carolynyeager.net/adolf-hitler-political-meaning-folkish

    Dalton’s translation is the best there is. I do not care whether you read what I’m presenting on my site, or get it somewhere else. I’m not trying to promote myself but this incredible leader. If any nation was in bad shape and in the control of Jewish forces, with a dark future, it was Germany in 1925 when this was written/dictated by AH. It requires that we look at our STRENGTH rather than our weakness. See only victory, and the way to it – that’s what all great leaders do.

    We’re badly in need of inspiration.

    • Thanks: DaveE, Druid55
    • Replies: @TRM
    , @Achilles Wannabe
  112. @anonymous

    The big difference between Islam and Judaism is that Islam (like Christianity) is a universalist religion, whereas Judaism is almost purely tribal. Hardcore Muslims wants all non-Muslim humanity to either convert and kowtow to the Black Stone in Mecca, or be enslaved or die. Hardcore Jews just want all non-Jewish humanity to be enslaved or die, period.

    Also, Judaism was made for mostly literate people with IQs averaging about 100. Islam copied most of it, but adapted it for mostly illiterate people with IQs averaging about 80. So a lot was left out, and/or dumbed down for the benefit of the target audience.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  113. Wally says:
    @gotmituns

    Q:
    Why do French streets have trees?
    A:
    So the Germans can march in the shade.

    Actually:

    – The industrial Ruhr region of Germany was occupied by France

    – Before any German response, not so neutral France had positioned two million soldiers on the Belgian border and the British Exp. Force had another half million troops positioned to assault Germany.

    – Belgium & Holland agreed with France and England to use their airspace for military purposes against Germany before Germany did anything.

    – France invaded Germany, the Saar in 1939, and throughout this entire period Hitler was begging Churchill to negotiate a return to the status quo.

    – Britain & France did not declare war on the communist USSR which invaded from the east and took 60% of Poland.

  114. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Lol what happened with your servile anglodogs?

    No people have ever done soo much for you dying again and again for jews and israel and look at them now

    Destroyed , dying by millions by opioid overdose , their childrens raped by muslims , their history erased and being replaced to extinction

    Even wasp figures like jared taylor the figure head of race realism recognized jewish superiority, with the implicit pact of letting jew be the masters with the implicit condition of letting anglos as number 2 but the jewish stablishment Spit over him with the comtenp a person treat a dog.

    Wasp and anglodogs Servile to the jews to their very end.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  115. @John Regan

    The American constitution is not an achievement : the first amendment defends free speech in as much as it is accompanied by money gifts, otherwise they say it has the value of a love declaration without any gifts to your sweetheart. Moreover it includes the sacred right to take any published opinon as an offence if you have a good lawyer to prove it. Wokery, which is the religion of perpetual offence, could only be born under the protection of First Amendment, and it is far from the first time such a thing has flourished thanks to the general puritan atmosphere. America was prevented thanks to the right to perpetual offense to develop any form of humanistic culture or discourse lest it testified of an immoral leisurely lifestyle : unless you had a lot of money you were supposed to work not to discuss about the state of the world or theological abstractions. You were not allowed to show off any too litterary culture nor to wear a fancy Parisian dress unless you were worth 1000 dollars or more. Cultural appropriation was a grave cultural sin right from the beginning.

  116. Katrinka says:
    @Lot

    All that Old Testament stuff went out the window when Jesus Christ instituted the New Covenant. Christians are the true Jews through faith in Jesus Christ. Galatians 3:29.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Druid55
  117. DaveE says:
    @Trinity

    IF Whites would stick together like every other sane race on this planet, we wouldn’t be in the position we find ourselves in now.

    That’s a big “IF”. For all our “rugged individuality”, we Whites have proven to the world what cowards we are, with a few exceptions like the subject of this piece and a great man named Hitler. (and Luther, Ford, a few others….)

    But barring a miracle, the Evil Ones will not be defeated peacefully and sitting around hoping for a miracle is exactly what has turned us (Whites) into such a pathetic bunch of cowards and fools.

    I pray every day that Christ will help us with our Jew Problem, but I realized about age 4 or 5 that belief in Santa Claus was probably not going to get me too far in life. (Or even a few few toys…)

    Time for us Whites to prove our mettle AND our metal. God may rescue us in the end, but in the meantime, we got a job to do. Let’s get busy.

    Be strong, Mssr. Ryssen and Thank You for your service.

  118. Katrinka says:
    @Streisandfx

    A treasure trove. No wonder they want to lock this guy up and throw away the key.

  119. @Bardon Kaldian

    #88

    And, that said- this guy is an idiot. French Jews are not a threat to France, unlike hordes or Africans & Arab (and other) Muslims, and this moron fails to see it. Cognitive dissonance at its height.

    London, I think, is less than 50% white, let alone English. Moscow, on the other hand, is 93% Russian.

    Bardon, you know fewer and fewer people are falling for this over played distraction of getting the goyim to fight one another over silly jingoisms of race or national origins, rather than their facing off with their real oppressors, which will eventually unite them against those that are running rough shod over by them.

    Europe and the Middle East can be fixed, but not in their current coerced political orientations. Sure over immigration is a destructive tool but who set it in motion and for what purpose?

    Was not the Zio-Jew immigration of your kind the cause of great destruction and mayhem in Palestine until this very day? As these foreign and violent immigrants arrived with a very supremacist and violent ideology to overthrow the national culture and oust their people for a full takeover. Had they arrived to live in peace, harmony and yes, nominal brotherhood, with the native inhabitants the world would be a far better place.

    The African/Arab/Asian immigrants to Europe will eventually settle in to the dominant culture of their host country or they may repatriate to their home countries as many do yearly, as Central Americans do from the USA. Sorry, but unlike others, it is well known that those you heap abuse at are only marginalized economic immigrants, with no ideology to overthrow or take over their host people and culture. Though they may stick out sorely now, with time the situation will settle if immigration can be curtailed and no doubt it surely will, if Europeans regain control of their political systems.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  120. I am familiar with statements about Jews which are considered by some (mostly Jews) to be anti-semetic, where Gentiles differ. This article made some comments which refers to material authored by Mssr. Ryssen such as saying that Jews are an incestuous people, exert much influence in the areas of governance, finance and politics, particularly in France. While I have not read any books or other types of literature written by him, imprisoning anyone for their views on anything through oral or written words seems puzzling. This article other than assertions by Ryssen, although inflammatory and derisive, does not justify his imprisonment. Has Messr. Ryssen, struck “a proverbial nerve” within Jewry? If not, then why this draconian response?

  121. profnasty says:
    @noname27

    And Donald Trump speaks of American White Nationalists. But only on tinterhooks.

    • Replies: @noname27
  122. profnasty says:
    @Ray Caruso

    I think Jesus was talking to the Rabbinic/Pharisee sect. They were determined to kill Him. I don’t think the Gospel condemns all Jews out of hand. Doesn’t judgement occur after death, not at death.
    (I don’t pretend to be a biblical scholar, but I approve of this message.)

  123. @Commentator Mike

    I just meant to defend the art of caricature which seems to be under attack by the PC culture.

    Fair enough. That is a separate argument though. I was simply focusing on what is effective today, under the existing legal, cultural and moral regime.

    With respect to effectiveness, it’s always context-dependent. The cartoon you posted is a good example. It created more panic that it would have if it had been posted on some far right site because it was published by the NYT. People don’t normally expect the NYT to be ‘anti-semitic,’ so it caused far more people who saw it to think a bit about Israeli influence on American policy. Same with Ryssen’s cover: if the author was someone with scrupulously anti-racist credentials, then that cover would actually be fairly effective (or so I’d predict).

  124. @Tommy Thompson

    Bullshit on steroids.

    Jews are not dominating, nor oppressing anyone in broader European world. Not in France, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland, Czechia, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, US, Germany, Austria, Belgium,…

    There is not Jewish dominance in Austria.

    Nor in Australia.

    Nor in Russia.

    Nor in Netherlands.

    Nor in Italy.

    Nor in France.

    Nor in Finland.

    Nor in Argentina.

    Nor …

    Anyone thinking otherwise is a complete idiot no mentally sane person would waste time in arguing about it.

    They sometimes stick out as a barely visible group, but mostly they’re indistinguishable from the locals. Unlike Muslims or Africans, who- even when they are decent citizens- are simply too alien & indigestible.

  125. @Franklin Ryckaert

    What has happened to the famous Jewish sense of humor?

    I’d say it’s alive and well.

    Jewish humor is supposed to come at the expense of your interests (if anyone’s), not at the expense of Jewish interests, after all.

  126. @Aristotle1

    Having said this, the cover does not look “illegal” to me and it should not be deemed such unless it breaches obscenity laws.

    I wouldn’t have thought it looked “illegal” either, but then I doubt you have any greater familiarity with French legal thought regarding speech than I do (mine is zero). By all means, let people make this argument if it helps get Ryssen (or future Ryssens) off the hook. The real trick, though, is to be effective without getting yourself into legal hot water in the first place. Or at least to make a big enough splash so that if you do eventually get into hot water, your arrest might generate mass sympathy for you and revulsion at ‘the system.’ (That’s the general rule isn’t it, that the revolution can’t succeed until the leader’s been imprisoned?)

    • Replies: @frankie p
    , @Aristotle1
  127. Bill P says:
    @Aristotle1

    Well, I think they’ll go the way of Soviet Jews if the West goes full woke. Judaism is a religion, not a race, and if the religion is suppressed, which will happen if the BIPOC gang gets its way, they’ll just melt into the population. I don’t personally know any secular Jews who married Jews. Granted there aren’t many Jews where I live, but it doesn’t seem that they’re making much of an effort to preserve the ethnicity.

    It would seem that their best bet would be to work toward preserving a strong, conservative, Christian majority in western countries, but that goes against Judaism itself and therefore they can’t do it, so they’re stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    In non-Christian societies they have no special status, so if they do manage to maintain a community it’s generally marginalized and small with no clout to speak of.

    As for Israel, I don’t really know, but I can’t see it having such outsized regional power forever. Eventually, they’ll have to come to some kind of detente with the Muslims that surround them. Perhaps it will become a vassal state to some future caliphate when the West turns inward again.

    • Replies: @Aristotle1
    , @Johann Ricke
  128. ATBOTL says:
    @Lot

    Lot is an anti-white neocon Jew pretending to care about France. I strongly urge everyone on here to support the Palestinians and BDS. It’s the best way we can fight anti-white Jews like Lot. Hit them where it hurts. Boycott Israel, boycott Israelis. Nothing makes these scum angrier.

    • Agree: Art, Alfred
    • Replies: @DaveE
  129. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:

    We not only need to scape of the jewmatrix but the fake counter revolution the anglocuckery have represented too in the last couple of years

    You dont make pacts with the devil you simply kill it

  130. Art says:

    Hmm —- Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité

    Maximilien de Robespierre’s rules in France – not the Marquis de Lafayette.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  131. “anti-sionisme est anti-semitisme” (Emmanuel Macron). Uttering such an absurd equivalency between a political ideology and an ethnicity reveals the degree of moral, ideological seizure of the French governing body by the Judeo-Zionist Nomenclatura. Thank you, President Mitterand, for setting the Tribe´s cats among the French pigeons.

    • Replies: @Alfred
  132. The Power Of Jewish Money. Politicians paid off with the money the (G)banksters create and loan to sovereign Nations, at interest. Then the nation’s leaders under threat or blackmail give billions to Israel, ADL, JDL, SCPLC, to name just a few, that money, public money, is then used to buy and corrupt the (s)elected politicians who pretending to be representing sovereign nations pass laws against nature.
    What I just said is, they don’t even use their own money to prosecute us under unnatural laws that the Jew wrote and paid for to be put before the legislatures they put in office. It’s the perfect crime, and rather humorous. Certainly they must be laughing.

  133. @Bardon Kaldian

    “No country has ever survived if they favored racial or ethnic minorities at the expense of its core, funamental people.”

    Oikophobia is now fashionable among our “best” and “brightest.” They regard the disdain they openly display for the values and history of their forebears as a hallmark of sophistication and think rubes those who, despite recognizing the shortcomings of their country, society and culture, choose not to heap them with scorn.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  134. Sulu says:

    As if any non-jew needs another reason to hate the jews. Stories like this make me see red. Imagine a people so hated for their actions and so paranoid that they feel they need to imprison anyone that criticizes them. All they are doing by this is hastening the day when the ovens are fired up for them.

    Sulu

  135. @Art

    The original was “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité ou La Mort,” with La Mort dispensed in spades.

  136. @Vojkan

    Zionism is the cancer. You don’t fight cancer by cosying up to it.

    Although I can understand perfectly well why someone on ‘our side’ (broadly) would hate Israel, I’m not convinced that Israel’s destruction/absence would make anything easier for us, nor that Israel’s existence makes anything harder than it would otherwise be.

    As things stand today, Israel provides a useful example of a ‘western country’ (not really, but that is how westerners generally perceive it, and it’s perception that matters) doing what it thinks it must in order to safeguard its interests, even if this contravenes cherished liberal principles. It’s a useful model for our own politicians to emulate, none of whom has any experience in behaving ethnocentrically (all they know is cucking).

    Also, it allows you to say “I want for my people what Jews have for theirs in Israel,” with the reasonable expectation that people – everyone aside from the far left, essentially – will refrain from retorting that what Jews have in Israel is wrong. All they can say is it’s wrong for you to want that, thus exposing the double standard. (Contrast that muted response what you could expect if you argued “I want for my people what Hitler had for his,” lol.)

    So Israel is a both a useful model and an easy argument. To my way of thinking, that outweighs its allegedly ‘cancerous’ aspects.

    • Agree: Lot
  137. anarchyst says:

    Herve Ryssen is but the latest victim of jewish supremacism.
    Monika Schaefer
    Sylvia Stolz
    Ursula Haverbeck
    Ernst Zundel
    …and many others have been crushed under the boot heel of jewish supremacism.
    In the case of Ernst Zundel, his Canadian home was firebombed by jews and he was badly beaten by jewish types. The perpetrators were never prosecuted as the Canadian government “looked the other way”. The Canadian government KNEW who the perpetrators were but refused to prosecute them.
    A long time ago, I used to chuckle at those who claimed that our governments were actually controlled by jews-ZOG (zionist occupation government) but no more.
    One cannot directly question the loyalty of jews to their respective governments an societies, but can attack them obliquely with TRUTH.
    Create flyers with the above persecuted individuals with a simple statement: Why have these people been imprisoned?” Hand them out in front of the jewish freak shows known as holocaust™ museums. You can bet that the local media organizations will run with the story about “white supremacists” distributing “anti-semitic” flyers.

    • Replies: @Geowhizz
  138. anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Jews are not dominating, nor oppressing anyone in broader European world. Not in France,…

    Yeah, right. We could see how the French president Macron was shown as a trophy (or a slave?) to the audience during the last annual meeting of the French equivalent to AIPAC (CRIF).

    If that is not a show of dominance, then what is it?
    As Ryssen says, you guys always pretend to be innocent despite all evidences

    • Agree: Robjil, Katrinka, Rdm, Druid55
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Rdm
  139. noname27 says: • Website
    @profnasty

    I hope so and especially if they get organised.

  140. anarchyst says:
    @Katrinka

    You are correct.

    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments proscribe certain behavior, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on his normally-misbehaving “people”.

    That my work fine for jews, as they have their evil “talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.

    In fact, every jewish “holiday” is based on the celebration of genocide of gentiles.
    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” western countries.

    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.

    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their “covenant” with their false god was then “null and void”.

    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.

    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The only common thread between Christianity and judaism may be the Ten Commandments, nothing more.

    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.

    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.

    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews. In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud.

    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ. Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.

    As always is the case, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution? (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way). It makes absolutely no sense at all.

    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. Jews have no respect for Christians or any other religion.

    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were exposed, named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.

    As an aside, israel’s favorite “war song” is “Onward Christian Soldiers”.

  141. It should be alarming, when the spoken or written word or opinions will be punished harder than physical violence.

    A real Democracy doesn’t need special political laws.
    Unwritten ones like political correctness or special created ones like “hate-speech”.

    In a real Democracy an insult is an insult and should be sued and punished if it is the case.
    But with “insult” you can’t send people to jail or destroy their social existence.

    But it is obvious that “hate speech” and political correctness is used to silence all critiques from the Right.It is very rare and seldom used in the case of Leftwingers or Islamists.

    So it is an non-democratic tool of non-democratic and non-elected ones behind the scene.

    Money rules the world.
    The real decision makers acting behind the scene.

  142. noname27 says: • Website
    @Lot

    The Jews are Hamitic Canaanites, not Semitic Israelites. Oh and Lot was not a Jew. Your education starts here:

    Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
    https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

    Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
    https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

  143. @dotmpe

    Koran (the late comer), Torah, Bible, Talmud, early attempts at social engineering. Drifting away from the issue, Jews, the mindset, is only partly in direct correlation with religion. There is race, there is class, …there are the domestics (Macron (supposedly French genetically, go figure)).

  144. @Wielgus

    In original form, in French language, duly? attributed to Voltaire. Anyhow, the saying is a good example of spinning the source attribution (Einstein and his theories). The content of the statement is exempt of blame though, it stands the test of time. Fully agreed.

  145. @Kolya Krassotkin

    Historically, it was fashionable sometimes (Romans & Greek language, Frederick the Great & French, …)- but never followed by open contempt for core national traditions & identity.

  146. anon[126] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Caruso

    who said god chose the jews….
    when and where did god do that…. who were witnesses to that event….
    same about Jesus as an immaculate conception…
    so many questions of verification with all of those stories. where did they originate, who reported them…..

    who were the original Hebrews….

    were the Russian Khazarian jew converts there, at the point of jews being chosen by god among all his human children…..

    what a ridiculous god then, to make many kinds of children then make one child chosen and better than the rest.

    that is exactly what we are told never to do with our own children, never to play favorites among them. how can we be admonished and directed on a particular type of behavior and yet god the creator is free to do relatively whatever he damn well pleased….

    what I see with all the christian religions and judaism is an ocean river of lies, lies and more lies. we are asked to believe. there is never verification of anything we are asked to believe and as we mature what we are asked to believe is revealed to be the essence of ill logic yet we go on with it

    and in practice those who represent the words of god like the religions, and the jewish people themselves by behavior prove to be the essence of the god nemesis satan himself…

    in the entire western intellectual superstructure, philosophy, history, even science there is nothing at all I take seriously as a result of Jewish domination for so long. there has been no general heroes who have stood up. they are all fakes, lies. and so far no figures cast down as devils have been in fact devils. I began appreciative of Lenin and Trotsky and hated Stalin. and I am stunned at how we were all taken in by Marx, just as we all have been taken in by the western religions, especially the catholic church, a fake and monster of monsters participatory belief system

    what is there to take seriously…..
    only that which has been proven. all the rest are lies. and we know who the liars are…

    we have an entire western so called civilization functioning routinely, daily, 24-7, on total lies. incredible that we have not blow ourselves up yet. but its only a few seconds to midnight says the dooms day clock

  147. Rdm says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    When Jared Kushner, Mnuchin looks like a real White person (Slavic), your comment can be taken seriously.

    Only snakes can see other snakes’ legs.

    I can immediately tell if a person is Jews or European Whites.

  148. Notsofast says:
    @Rurik

    France fought the second world war for about 15 minutes and then rolled over like the cheese eating surrender monkeys they are. The french were quite comfortable in vichy france until the tide of the war turned and then everybody fought for the resistance. They are and always have been whores, and whores always know who has money and who doesn’t.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  149. @Bardon Kaldian

    The question is how a powerless group could get an intellectual jailed for criticizing then. Are white french natives powerful enough to get someone jailed for talking about white supremacy?

  150. Vojkan says:
    @silviosilver

    Opposing Jewish supremacism – that is what zionism is – doesn’t necessarily mean wishing the destruction of Israel. That said, you can’t compare a sixteen and a half centuries old country like France and a totally artificial creation like Israel.

    As things stand today, Israel provides a useful example of a ‘western country’ (not really, but that is how westerners generally perceive it, and it’s perception that matters) doing what it thinks it must in order to safeguard its interests

    If people’s perception of reality is wrong, you don’t try to change the reality, you try to influence the perception so to make it better match reality. If the French did what Jews do to foreign countries in order to “safeguard their interests”, I would oppose it the same. There is no example of French people massively infiltrating foreign countries at every level and faking allegiance to them while working for the sole benefit of France.

    I don’t want for my people “what Jews have for theirs in Israel”, I want for all people what rightfully belongs to them. France rightfully belongs to the French, Germany to Germans, Russia to Russians. Obviously, zionists don’t share my opinion, they believe they own the whole world.

    So no, I don’t consider Israel to be a “useful example”.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @silviosilver
  151. @anon

    Emmanuel Macron seems to be a perfect shabbos goy of the Jews, or is he perhaps a (crypto) Jew himself? If I show here is a picture of his mother, you can perhaps understand why I raise that question :

  152. @Bardon Kaldian

    “…Jews are not dominating, nor oppressing anyone in (the) broader European world…”

    You are either completely ignorant or you work for the Jews. Since you seem to be well informed on so many other subjects, I fear for the latter…

  153. Bill P says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    She looks like a transsexual version of Charles de Gaule.

    • LOL: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Geowhizz
  154. @Ogmios

    Perish the thought that US doctors, most of them educated at some taxpayer expense–direct or indirect, can’t find enough charity work with patients right here in the US. You know, all those patients that mean ol’ Donald Trump has thrown under the bus. But nothing has a more vibrant virtue signal than a Médecins Sans Frontières bumper sticker on your Land Rover, a write up in your local Rotary Club bulletin and an invite to speak at the next Chamber of Commerce gathering.

  155. Rdm says:
    @anon

    Looks uncomfortable Macron became with the twisted position of his arm.

    I wonder if there’s any clip KKK leaders grasp Netanyahu’s wrist in their Klan meeting?

  156. DaveE says:
    @ATBOTL

    Hit them where it hurts. Boycott Israel, boycott Israelis. Nothing makes these scum angrier.

    Yes, and be prepared to back it up with much stronger measures when “hitting them in the purse” is not enough anymore.

  157. Lot says:
    @silviosilver

    Agree 10X.

    And not just me. Effective nationalists like Marine, Geert, Nigel, and Orban are certified Friends of the Nose.

    Israel shows: white people can have a 3+ birthrate, say NO to mass migration, say NO is Islam. All while maintaining a clean wealthy technologically-advanced democracy.

    That’s why the anti-white left in the USA and Europe hates Israel so much.

    • Replies: @Druid55
  158. Keep locking us up to show us how free we are! What a strategy.

  159. TRM says:
    @Katrinka

    Problem is that 99% of people will live in fear of being called a name. They also fear their careers being destroyed. As others have pointed out even Jews get “taken to the woodshed” over speaking the truth.

    Those in the Jewish community who speak out have my admiration. They are considered and treated like traitors by the Zionists. Hats off to Gilead Atzmon, Max Blumenthal, Dan Cohen, Lee Camp and all the others.

    • Thanks: Katrinka
    • Replies: @anon
  160. AaronB says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    No country has ever survived if they favored racial or ethnic minorities at the expense of its core, fundamental people.

    I wonder if it is related to asceticism as a phenomena.

    Self-torture has been popular in different ages. Its basically an ultra-refined form of the will to power. Nietzsche wrote a lot on asceticism – he thought science was a form of ascetcism because it denies our natural pleasure in not being neutral and we need to suppress our emotions to do science.

    So apparently different phenomena can plausibly be a form of asceticism.

    Europe until recently had an incredibly strong will to power. Maybe after reaching the summit in everything there was nowhere else to go. So a new refined form of the will to power had to be invented.

    I am not at all sure that those liberals don’t feel a thrill of pure pleasure and excitement when they talk about how evil white people are.

  161. frankie p says:
    @silviosilver

    Finally you begin to think. Ryssen said himself that when enough people speak out and are imprisoned for telling the truth, a political movement will begin. Perhaps Herve was deliberately pushing buttons with the cover to get a reaction. By the way, a revolution succeeds when large numbers of the revolutionaries are jailed, leading to the critical mass that you mention, when many others who are initially sympathetic to the revolution but unwilling to take action finally have had enough. Herve Ryssen wants to push France in that direction, and with white Yellow Jackets in the streets last year and the Holocough currently gutting the middle class, isn’t it a perfect time?

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  162. @Vojkan

    Opposing Jewish supremacism – that is what zionism is – doesn’t necessarily mean wishing the destruction of Israel.

    Firstly, you’re contradicting yourself by defining Jewish supremacism as zionism (ie the existence of Israel) and then claiming that it’s not necessary to oppose the existence of Israel in order to oppose Jewish supremacism.

    Secondly, if we pretend that that contradiction didn’t occur, and your statement simply reads “opposing Jewish supremacism doesn’t necessarily mean wishing the destruction of Israel,” I would like to ask you to outline the circumstances under which it doesn’t.

    I don’t want for my people “what Jews have for theirs in Israel”, I want for all people what rightfully belongs to them.

    There’s no neutral, objective standard for determining what rightfully belongs to whom. If I want to know who Kosovo rightly belongs to, I will get a very different answer depending on whether I ask a Serb or ask an Albanian.

    If the French did what Jews do to foreign countries in order to “safeguard their interests”, I would oppose it the same

    If you’re referring to the flooding of European countries with useless turd world immigrants, I would certainly agree. Although Israel has historically been among the first countries to raise a hue and cry whenever an anti-immigration party threatens to take power, it can’t really be blamed for “causing” the crisis. That’s much more the work of domestic Jews than Israelis.

    But if you’re referring to Jewish/Israeli attempts to influence the foreign policy of various countries in a way that is favorable to Israel, then I would have to disagree. I certainly wouldn’t oppose the French if they were trying to influence my country to support their hold on Algeria. Hell, I would have avidly supported them, maybe even considered volunteering myself (probably wouldn’t, but the thought would likely have crossed my mind).

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  163. @silviosilver

    I would disagree, most of the left are anti-Israel nowadays, especially with the left’s ranks being filled with more and more Muslims. A better strategy is to compare Europeans to Palestinians who are being displaced in their own lands by hostile settlers.

    Siding with Israel is not a good look, although I do agree that they correctly look after their own peoples interests and this is a noble thing that Europeans should also do for their own kind.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    , @Lot
  164. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The guy literally worked at Rothschild bank, one can imagine the connections he made there.

  165. TRM says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You should check out Reinhard Gehlen’s memoirs sometime. He names both Borman and Hitler as traitors who’s goal was to destroy Germany.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  166. Hossein says:

    The French are becoming stupid by suppressing freedom of speech and allowing charlatans with loyalty to another country impose and dictate laws that are contrary to what they fought and died for and that is Liberty.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  167. Barka says:

    The author failed to mention Herve Ryssen is a homosexual with multiple partners. Not an example to follow!
    I used to listen to him, he is quite intelligent but he is unfortunately leading a corrupt lifestyle

  168. @Bardon Kaldian

    You are more likely to get mugged, beaten or raped by a recent immigrant than by a Jew but that’s only because it’s small pickings for them – they prefer their crimes big and organised. But you’re more likely to lose your life savings in some Jewish financial swindle or the biggest one of all – something they call the “economy”. And they mass rape women through their control of the sex trade and human trafficking, as well as profiting from it.

    Anyway it’s the Arabs and Muslims who have been at the forefront of the struggle of the goyim against the Jews and made the biggest sacrifices, while Christians and Europeans have not been pulling their weight, and in fact are colluding and cooperating with the Jews. Maybe Arabs and Muslims are getting fed up with it and hence the latest peace overtures to Israel. In Europe the Jews and immigrants work hand in glove while the white Europeans are like sheep going for shearing.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @silviosilver
  169. @Rich

    Whether one agrees with Ryssen or not, freedom of speech should be sacrosanct.

    It’s [not so] funny when one realizes that those at the forefront of diversity can’t deal with [or handle] different opinions.

    They want you and me to sing from the same hymn book.

    The one they’ve written for us and anyone who strays asunder, will have to die [in the name of All Lives Splatter Matter].

  170. @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    The problem with that is that left are anti-nationalist and they are not logical or reasonable people. So addicted are they to ‘anti-racism,’ it will be an uphill battle all the way to convince them that Europeans are in an analogous position to Palestinians rather than to Israelis. And then what of the muslims in the anti-Israel camp? Why should they support Europeans, when they rightly surmise that European nationalists overwhelmingly disdain Islam? It’s asking a lot of the average nationalist to cozy up to people like this, especially when there is so little chance of reciprocity.

  171. Anon[269] • Disclaimer says:
    @Guillaume Durocher

    Well, but they did écrasé l’infâme, didn’t they?

  172. anon[126] • Disclaimer says:
    @TRM

    this prevarication makes me laff at white people…..

    all the time white people left Jews alone although they knew what the equation was. now time has eaten up the leeway and the limits of the equation have been reached. white people are just like any other people to Jews, period! they must be taken car of if the Jews are to rule the and own the planet.

    so no its time for the egomaniac, narcissistic whites to get theirs and they cant deal with it. and the stupidity flows like water in these spaces, like this load from Katrina here.

    what is the equation if white people do nothing…..

    exactly! Brave New World, depopulation, all manner of evil done onto them, unto us all. Katrina is not one of us as well. or does she have an exemption when the horror time arrives….

    so what must white people do, what must we all do, we ordinary people worry about a few being taken to a woodshed when they are destroying our whole world, taking away our very lives, all we like to do, the living, everything

    to hell with that! worse than woodsheds is to come! if all ordinary people rise up, which is exactly what must happen to save us all, then no one is going to any god damn woodshed. then the Jewish people will be belled, tamed or chased, and worse many eliminated. but they will have no more social power. leave them to deal with the Arabs and the rest of the world they have raped with American help and power, on their very own, while a new American social reality tries to mend its global broken fences and set America right in and with the world

    it is us, or them! that is the equation. and no prevarication is necessary. prevarication was always unnecessary. the cat should have been belled from the start to obviate all the evil that has happened in the interim. what! are we going to let it go on when we know they are coming for our very lives…!!!!!

  173. @Hossein

    And don’t forget Equality. They have now put the Jews and Jewish interests above themselves and their own. And then, some Brotherhood that?!

  174. ariadna says:

    Instructive video:

  175. @Ogmios

    Drugs with no limits!
    Now that’s something I’d vote for.

  176. Anon[411] • Disclaimer says:

    Worthy of note is Marine Le Pen’s distancing herself away. Considering that her party also scratched the withdrawal from the Euro from its platform, she is now officially exposed as Controlled Opposition.

  177. @Ugetit

    Sometimes it is so easy to spot a fake: like a $330-dollar bill, or like 6,000,000 murdered, or like ALL the Korean sex-slaves were dragged from their homes. Any judge fooled by these fakes should be banned for life.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  178. @John Regan

    I don’t agree : Judaism was not meant for intelligent people : it has been meant for a majority of 80 IQ people to be governed by 3% 160 IQ people, like Hinduism. Judaism doesn’t ask you to have faith or to meditate about God but to obey, fear and never, never to have any direct contact with God : it is an alliance with a malevolent extraterrestrial power that proclaims its jealousy of every form of human accomplishment and promises you material prosperity in exchange of obedient stupidity through tribal prejudice and instinctive attachment to money : the triumph over the goys is to be achieved by those supernatural forces only, all that is required from you is stupid work, hate and fear. Islam on the other hand was meant for very bright people and for a few centuries they did reach world intellectual records that put them right at the door of making an industrial revolution, but they rapidly got stuck with more and more dumbasses as their conquests reached too far southwards and eastwards with the result that their religion transformed into something its heirs no longer understand.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  179. @Commentator Mike

    But you’re more likely to lose your life savings in some Jewish financial swindle

    You seriously think this is more likely than getting mugged by an immigrant?

    or the biggest one of all – something they call the “economy”

    Grow up.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  180. Iva says:

    Last year an old man in Poland set on fire a man sized doll of Soros. He went to prison because the doll looked like a Jew. Well, Soros is a Jew. Polish Catholics, for hundreds of years on Easter, they would burn puppets of Judas.  It is forbidden now because the puppet looks too much like a Jew. Well Juda was a Jew. Like someone once said : “if you want to know who rules the world, see whom you are not allowed to criticize” . Jews, by prosecuting others for criticism, reveal the answer to the world.

  181. @Carolyn Yeager

    “100% HITLERISM. The key ingredient of Jewish power is making ‘Whites’ afraid of that, willing to go along with anti-nazism. And who do you white assholes blame for that? Hitler, that’s who you blame!”

    Carolyn, WHO are you talking to ? No, the more I learn about Hitler , the more I admire him. I don’t blame him for anything. I blame the Jews

    But we are where we are and it is very bad. Every once in a while I am struck by just how bad it is. Then I can get emotional. This is what my post was – an emotional reaction, an expression of fear in facing a people who are out to destroy our civilization and who already have done a very competent job of doing it. Don’t forget that it was the Jews who destroyed National Socialism – not just submissive white people but very clever, ingeniously manipulative, Western fifth columnist Jews.

    Yes, I could have said I wasn’t giving up. I guess I just assumed that people would not think that I was giving up. I won’t make that mistake again. But we are in a war, losing, and that makes me nervous. So sometimes I say so. OK, that is not triumph of the will but that is the way it is for me.

    Solidarity, huh?

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  182. Vojkan says:
    @silviosilver

    There’s no neutral, objective standard for determining what rightfully belongs to whom. If I want to know who Kosovo rightly belongs to, I will get a very different answer depending on whether I ask a Serb or ask an Albanian.

    The thing is, everything that was built in Kosovo prior to the Ottoman occupation was built by Serbs. The toponymy of Kosovo is Serbian. Every town and every village, every mountain and every hill, every river and every stream have Serbian names. Their etymology is Serbian. The Albanians have just put an Albanian spelling on them. The word Kosovo is a short for Kosovo Polje which means “the field of the blackbird”. I think that is objective enough to determine that the Albanians are in Kosovo what the Khazarians are in Palestine, invaders. Kosovo is Serbian just as Saint-Denis near Paris is French, regardless of who went there in the near past.

    Although Israel has historically been among the first countries to raise a hue and cry whenever an anti-immigration party threatens to take power, it can’t really be blamed for “causing” the crisis. That’s much more the work of domestic Jews than Israelis.

    And those “domestic” Jews all pledge allegiance to Israel, like Bernard-Henry Lévy in France who has only contempt for anything traditionally French, supports Islamic radicals everywhere except in Palestine and is filled with exhilaration at the sound of the word Israel.

    I certainly wouldn’t oppose the French if they were trying to influence my country to support their hold on Algeria.

    I would. Algeria belongs to Algerians as France belongs to the French. When my country is wrong, it is still my country but it is wrong. Loyalty doesn’t mandate condoning crimes. I disapprove of French crimes and I disapprove of Serb crimes because I actually have only one moral standard.

    • Agree: ariadna, Iris
    • Replies: @techvet
    , @silviosilver
  183. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Caruso

    To faithful Christians as opposed to Judeophile cultists, Jews are, at best, in the same category as Muslims, which is to say, they are inimical infidels.

    So what? At face value, for muslims almost everybody else are infidels, with many like you, inimical too. The term infidel itself is hardly a slur. Thank God that I am an infidel of all pagan faiths.

    It is the truth behind the term which has real meaning. By calling others “infidels,” you seem to imply that you are the “true believers,” which is laughable. In your own deluded minds that may be true, but does it satisfy the core tenets of spiritual logicality?

    Your pagan mangods-worshipping faith is based on hearsay. A similar kind of hearsay, which hindoos believe in their own pagan mangods. Just imagine, those pagans believe that your kind are “inimical infidels” too, just like you do of them! Can you now comprehend the sheer absurdity of calling someone that, especially with spiteful intent?

    Your kind base their entire salvation on centuries old hearsay. Have you considered whether that hearsay could have been concocted by deceitful men and women?

    Islam’s true monotheism, God is One and the only One worthy of worship, is not based on hearsay. If one believes that all existence we witness around us requires an Almighty Creator, they can’t possibly deny Islam’s core creed.

    Who are the real infidels?

  184. Wally says:
    @Irish Savant

    Indeed.

    IOW, ‘the truth is irrelevant‘.

    In this legal action, as the Tribunal’s presiding Commissioner declared, the truth or validity of the supposedly “hateful” items was not a consideration. The Tribunal ultimately ruled against Zundel, declaring the “Zundelsite” [his & his wife’s website] to be unlawful.

    Much more on the Zundel “trials” :

    Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail?: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=552

    “Truth Is No Defense” / Germany / Zundel show trial restarts: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2901

    The Genie is Out of the Bottle: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3242

  185. @Bardon Kaldian

    #129

    Jews are not dominating, nor oppressing anyone in broader European world.

    this is what I said in #124 :

    Bardon, you know fewer and fewer people are falling for this over played distraction of getting the goyim to fight one another over silly jingoisms of race or national origins, rather than their facing off with their real oppressors, which will eventually unite them against those that are running rough shod over by them.

    I never said that “Jews” were dominating . . . . You said it!

    Great Freudian slip.

    So you agree that it is the “Jews” who are dominating / oppressing Europe and not the Muslim/African migrants or extraterrestrials for that matter!!!

  186. @Commentator Mike

    Phew.

    You have much more growing up to do than I thought.

    If you’re actually interested in the economy enough that you’d read a title like that, why not take the time to learn a few things about economics from more mainstream sources? I can assure you this “fake economy” thesis you’re flogging is so absurd it’s beneath contempt and I think you’re bright enough that you’ll quickly grasp this.

    • Replies: @techvet
  187. @silviosilver

    Reality rarely matters in terms of creating political narratives, if you say it enough times it becomes real.

    It is good if nationalists hijack the Palestine movement for their own cause, Palestinians are not actually our enemies, they are just facing oppression by Israel, they appreciate Westerners of all hues supporting an end to aid to Israel.

    The left shouldn’t have a monopoly over this area, we should inject our narrative into this debate at every chance.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  188. anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    their childrens raped by muslims

    You made a typo.

    their (whitrash) childrens raped by our own degenerate Christian clergy (which we sweep under the carpet)

    There, fixed it for ya. 😀

    • Replies: @Anon
  189. Stig says:

    > French Jews were the first to flee the French suburbs because of Muslim criminality and hostility, but *other Whites* were not far behind.

    Language and its disingenuous (consciously or not) use in casual, passing phrases has proven to be such an effective means of subversion against white interests. This is but one example.

    The enemies of whites will notice, and punish the most innocent politically incorrect error, continually keeping us on our toes, in fear for our jobs and social standing. It is time we too begin to pay attention to such matters, and cease being the blundering, benefit-of-the-doubt-giving, open minded fools we have been for too long. So,

    Correction:

    > French Jews were the first to flee the French suburbs because of Muslim criminality and hostility, but *Whites* were not far behind.

    Jews are not white. There are videos on YT of jewish children at jewish camps (contemporary jew-run summmer camps, not those other ones), literally singing songs that say as much.

    This is no small matter and to make our fellow goyim understand this, that jews are not white, is a major task for dissidents. Ryssen’s work is one essential tool in this endeavor.

  190. @silviosilver

    Yes. The evil of the Jews is spectacularly exposed by this martyrdom of a French hero who, for France, has exposed the social destructiveness of the Jews.

    Spectacularly exposed. The Jews.

    Therefore a Jew needed to jump up and support Ryssen. Seemingly.

    So, obscured. Not the Jews as such. The Jews not to blame.

    A French Gentile punished for hate. When it’s the Jews, the Talmudists, who are trained to hate. To hate the Gentiles. The hatred of Gentiles is intrinsic to Judaism. Self-isolation needs hate. So a Gentile is punished for hate.

    I thank Durocher for making this widely known.

  191. Anon[212] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    Shut up scum the jew media make a movie every time a case appear in the catholic church while cover in the media the thousands of scandals done by muslims , thats the enormous difference .

    • Replies: @anon
  192. karel says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Or perhaps this one from František Kupka could be a good cover.

  193. karel says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    perhaps I have a problem with attaching the illustration of an alternative image.

  194. @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    I don’t think it’s as simple as just “saying it often enough.” It wouldn’t be that simple even if nationalists had the same resources as leftists and muslims.

    Leftists and muslims have made it their issue because they passionately care about it. Nationalists, deep down, don’t really care very much about Palestinians at all; they’re just saying it because they’re sore at Jews.

    So leftists and muslims have resources – almost the entire human rights industrial complex – and motivation going for them. From a cost-benefit point of view, it just doesn’t make much sense for nationalists to pursue this. The time and effort needed to wrench this issue from the left would be much better devoted to pursuing directly nationalist objectives.

    • Agree: Aristotle1
  195. techvet says:
    @Vojkan

    Well spoken. With clarity and a clean conscience. Something which our khazarian overlords do not like. When someone has been mired in double standards for far too long, they don’t know any better. Perhaps this is why they look on us, “simpler” souls, with utter disdain.

    • Thanks: Vojkan
  196. techvet says:
    @silviosilver

    “mainstream” LOL. Do you really think anything “mainstream” at this point has our best interests at heart?? Enuf with the deception. This isn’t the NYTimes

    • Thanks: Ugetit
    • Replies: @silviosilver
  197. @Vojkan

    The thing is, everything that was built in Kosovo prior to the Ottoman occupation was built by Serbs. The toponymy of Kosovo is Serbian. Every town and every village, every mountain and every hill, every river and every stream have Serbian names. Their etymology is Serbian.

    I know, I know. Everything about Kosovo is Serbian…

    …except the inhabitants themselves.

    So which matters more, who was there first, or who is there now? Whichever way one decides, that is emphatically a subjective determination.

    (Btw, if those arguments are good enough to justify a Serbian hold on Kosovo, why is it ‘cancerous’ if Jews say the same about Israel/Palestine?)

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Vojkan
  198. tempus says:

    There are two ethnicities that one can “insult, provocation, and public defamation due to origin, ethnicity, nationality, race, or religion” without fear of criminal charges: Palestinians and Southerners. Moreover, one is likely to receive accolades for “insult, provocation, and public defamation due to origin, ethnicity, nationality, race, or religion” these two ethnicities.

  199. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Pitting Muslim against homosexual
    while Yid skates around laughing.

    • Agree: Trinity
  200. @silviosilver

    The issue seems to be that the cover negatively stereotypes a people. Perhaps the written word is treated under different rules than pictorial images and you are saying that if you are engaged in a conflict you need to know all the rules and what you can be snagged on.

    I agree.

    The issue here, though, is generally lawfare in which vexatious legal cases are pushed to waste the opponent’s time and money. If the legal system is biased the cases will be made to stick or, at least, to use up as much time and money as possible.

    Ultimately, the need is to push the envelope without exposing yourself to legal or other attack. I don’t think that the conflict can be avoided – and if it is avoided then probably it means you are self-censoring and losing.

  201. Wielgus says:
    @Lot

    “Pray for Israel to meet the King of Peace, Christ.”
    Since the party line is that he was a false prophet of illegitimate birth fathered by a Roman soldier, that’s going to take a while…

  202. @Bill P

    This may all of course seem like crazy quackery but bear with me.

    I think you are looking at things too politically without seeing that the conflict we are looking at is a spiritual struggle.

    You are looking at demographics and geopolitics and reaching conclusions thereby. I think by treating this as a “normal” situation you are not understanding the matter fully. The powers we are referring to go beyond anything “normal”.

    The Jewish lobby at the moment effectively controls the United States foreign policy through its various pressure groups and think tanks. It controls its internal policy through its policing institutions such as the ADL. It controls and polices both thought and action. It also seeks not just to control America but also the West and the Middle East. Maybe going back to folklore we can say that a “cabal” actually wishes to control “the world”.

    This may seem crazy but life often is stranger than fiction. Seeing this situation through a normal political lens rather than through a spiritual lens is to misunderstand it.

    • Replies: @Bill P
  203. AaronB says:
    @silviosilver

    Its an interesting strategic choice, but the American extreme right seems to have taken an anti-Israel stance, unlike the European right which supports Israel.

    They even seem to wish to become servile lackeys of Islamists and Jihadis, who hold them in contempt and are attacking their societies, and would enslave them if they could.

    The American extreme right seems to be saying – no Jews in our countries, and also no Jewish homeland. I don’t know where they think that is going to end up, but it seems to be a total declaration of war against Jews without any possibility of accommodation. You know the saying about never corner an animal without possibility of escape.

    I think they envision Jews being stripped of their political rights and put in permanent ghettos, or, logically, extermination. Those are certainly the only two options considering their stance.

    It sounds more like an emotional stance than a strategic choice – they hate Jews so much, they would rather hurt Jews than build up their own countries or realize a political vision.

    What I think it shows is that the American extreme right is still a mob phenomenon – it has failed so far to attract any disaffected elites, necessary for dissident movements to succeed. Its human capital remains astonishingly low. The European right seems more sober and mature.

    Total declarations of war against entire segments of humanity, when you are the weaker party, tend not to work out so well strategically, so I think for the time being, the American extreme right does not represent any kind of real political force and is more an emotional lashing out.

  204. @Rich

    No. Free Speech is not sacrosanct. Nobody- NOT ONE MAN – has the right to attack Our Triune God and His commandments and His incarnation and His subsequent actions.

    • Replies: @Druid55
  205. @Badger Down

    Ha hahah,,,that statement is Orwellian if there ever was one….LOL We’re suspending commenting because we want you to have a safe place where you can’t comment on community experiences..It’s just too funny!!!

  206. Ugetit says:
    @Notsofast

    France fought the second world war for about 15 minutes and then rolled over like the cheese eating surrender monkeys they are.

    Yeah, so they would have been much smarter to do like the USA did and roll over and bend over on command for the One World mafia?

    The “whores” are the ones who supported the Zio-Marxist goon squads. Anyway, where’s your beef since you must know that the monkeys have surrendered to their masters a long time ago. In fact, one of the baboons just gave the alpha baboon a key to the Whore House!

    PS: The article is about one Frog who isn’t a surrender monkey…

  207. @TRM

    You believe Reinhard Gehlen?????

  208. Ugetit says:
    @Badger Down

    Agree.

    Also, for some reason I’ve yet to hear of anyone criticizing the GI sex slave camps in Vietnam. I’ve seen them, and it was not a pretty sight. Near one of the beaches there was an area full of hooches, pup-tent like structures made out of palm fronds outside of which GIs would like up for their turn as if they were lining up outside a mess hall.

  209. @Achilles Wannabe

    Achilles – What you quoted from me was not directed at you (I would never call you an asshole, lol) but to Whites in general — and there are more white assholes than there should be!
    Our best example/model of how to view and treat the enemy is the leadership of Third Reich Germany, so no wonder they are the most maligned. I’m glad you’re coming round about Hitler – You know, it’s my experience that if I ask the anti-Hitlerites to name any existing white leadership, they can’t do it. Then they come up with “lone wolf” theory. IMO, they just want to keep reading and writing.

    I think we need to be more upfront about AH – more matter of fact, if you will. Take away the shock or “can’t go there” value. That is what they’ve used to keep people away. I wish you would write to me at cy.net with a valid email so that I can contact you about a project that’s getting started. Solidarity.

  210. Vojkan says:
    @silviosilver

    I know, I know. Everything about Kosovo is Serbian…

    …except the inhabitants themselves.

    The inhabitants were in majority Serbian until the late 19th century. Albanians have become a majority through the combination of immigration from Albania, high natality and ethnic cleansing. If someone breaks into your house, expels you at gunpoint and declares to be the new owner, do you acquiesce or do you want to reclaim your property?

    (Btw, if those arguments are good enough to justify a Serbian hold on Kosovo, why is it ‘cancerous’ if Jews say the same about Israel/Palestine?)

    Because it is a false analogy. The Khazarians who settled in Palestine are not the descendants of the Jews of Judea. They are invaders just as the Albanians are invaders. The true natives are the Christian and Muslim semites the settlers cleansed to create Israel.

  211. @Carolyn Yeager

    “…You know, it’s my experience that if I ask the anti-Hitlerites to name any existing white leadership, they can’t do it…”

    Hungarian president Viktor Orban comes close. Also Putin should be mentioned in this respect. These men are not “charismatic” like Hitler was, rather mundane, but they achieved nevertheless much for their countries. Trump is only half hearted and is more “successful” in pleasing his Jewish masters than serving his own people.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  212. @AaronB

    #211

    They even seem to wish to become servile lackeys of Islamists and Jihadis, who hold them in contempt and are attacking their societies, and would enslave them if they could.

    It has been pretty well put to bed that the Islamists and Jihadis that are tearing apart the Middle East are doing so at the behest of their Zio-Israeli controllers, though usually though Arabian cut-outs as the middle men supplying the money and weapons. The Euro one’s caught out are pretty much the same, police and intel controlled dupes.

    There seems to be little if any grass roots support or birthing for the Jihadis even in the ME except by their clandestine handlers. In fact, VT (Veterans Today) and other investigators have outed that a number of intel officers from Israel and Western nations have been caught out leading these thugs in Syria. So best to drop that line about the Jihadis as it leads back to your masters.

    What is upsetting to you and other Zios is that they thought they had White Americana fully under their thumb (or foot), but it now seems that White Americana is waking up to their plight and rebelling against their newly found second and third class status in the USA homeland. This is probably on par with what is going on in France.

    What the Zios dont understand, is that although humanity can be divided by religion, ethnicity, race, education, income level, and even made up issues, all people believe they were born as equals (under God for the majority) and want to be treated as such with a hope filled and bright future.

    So the Goyim, no longer want to play the part of being the Goyim (someone else’s cattle), what is so hard to understand about that. And so the Palestinians dont want to be robbed of their ancestral homeland and put under a non-stop brutal military occupation so another can believe they have been spiritually or ideologically fulfilled. What is so hard to understand about that.

  213. Geowhizz says:
    @Bill P

    de Gaule was better looking.

  214. Geowhizz says:
    @anarchyst

    Jewish supremacism is enshrined in law and blessed by TPTB. White Gentile supremacism, however, not so much.

  215. Notsofast says:
    @Ugetit

    my response was not to the author but to rurik who had asked “didnt france fight a second world war to end that kind of vile racism?” i was trying to point out that france is not altruistic but rather all about the benjamins and always have been. by the way the benjamins always get a key to the white house no matter what type of simian we “elect”.

  216. AaronB says:

    What I don’t understand is why you extremist right wingers are against both Jews in your countries and in Israel.

    I can understand not wanting Jews in your countries. I understand the reasoning for that, at least.

    But when you then go and say Israel can’t exist either, it sounds like you’re just not looking for practical solutions anymore.

    It seems like more of an emotive stance than a thought out strategy. You just think Jews hurt you, so you want to hurt them back any way you can. You think Jews denied you nationalism, so you want to deny it to them, even if the Jews in Israel are a different group.

    I guess I understand that.

    There used to be an old saying “no quarter asked or given”. I guess that’s what how its gonna go for you guys.

    I think this shows also the anti-Jew stuff is just emotional venting on this site, and not about practical solutions, which makes sense. People who want real solutions think practically. I have always said the real value of Unz is that it provide a therapeutic venting space for thousands of people.

    Well, good luck with wherever you think you’re going with this. Unfortunately, I don’t relish being put in a permanent ghetto and stripped of my rights or being exterminated, which are the only two options an anti-Jew/anti-Israel position really allows for, so I don’t think I’m going to cooperate with you.

  217. Eagle Eye says:
    @Franz

    In a few more years all platforms and avenues of political, cultural, and economic speech will be private.

    Don’t swallow the canard that “we can’t regulate private acts.” That’s what they want you to believe.

    The Sherman Act (“anti-trust”) was passed in 1890.

    It is well established that a private entity cannot do what it wants. “Common carriers” providing a general public service have always been required to serve everyone except as justified by the nature of the service. Greyhound cannot refuse to carry people whose race or political views it doesn’t like. Fedex cannot refuse to carry propaganda.

    Google, Faceborg, Twitter, Apple etc. were set up and continue to thrive because they were sponsored and nurtured from the start by the Deep State. Google censorship is state censorship. Google is no less a public entity than the Social Security Administration or ICE. Even if these organizations were genuinely private, they remain subject to existing anti-trust law and common-carrier obligations to provide equal, unbiased service to all.

    • Replies: @Franz
  218. Robjil says:

    Jewish Supremacism is all the rage in the west these days. This JS all comes from the Torah/Old Testament. We are living in the Zion Age, circa 500 BC, these days. The 21st century does not exist in the mind of our rulers.

    https://www.euvolution.com/library/jewishsupremacism.pdf

    Anyone who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many blatant expressions of ethnic supremacism:

    1•Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other peoples of the world.

    2•Israelites have a right to rule over all other people and are prom-ised that they will someday own and rule over the whole world.

    3•Israelites boast of genocide against whole peoples and king-doms.

    4•Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands where they intend to live and to kill all the people of foreign na-tions that do not submit themselves in slavery.

    5•Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants forever.

    6. Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or “mix their seed” with other peoples.

  219. @Franklin Ryckaert

    This is the second time you could only offer Viktor Orban as an alternative to Hitler. Pathetic, just as I said the first time. Of course, I like Orban and have a number of posts praising him on my website, starting pretty far back. But he is not dealing with the “Jewish Question” at all, only the Moslem question, and even meets and makes deals with Israel/Netanyahu to increase trade, etc. To Orban, Hungary’s Jews are not the problem – only certain ones like Hungarian national George Soros.
    You have proved my point.

    Trump is only half hearted and is more “successful” in pleasing his Jewish masters than serving his own people.

    Correction. Trump doesn’t have any Jewish masters or any masters, and your saying that just proves again how wrong you are about most things, and especially America and Americans. Trump’s pro-Israel policy is not the result of any kind of force or being mastered. It’s the long-standing post-war U.S. policy. Maybe Viktor Orban is hemmed in by Jewish masters? You think?

  220. Rdm says:
    @AaronB

    I agreed to your sentiment and reasoning. 

    That’s why I commented occasionally here that those WNs supporting Trump and his ilk are thinking that Trump is pro-White and their leader. Well, in fact, Trump knows where to push the button and get the narrative right. He can forgo 2% Jews votes by going anti-semites and rally the 70% White votes. But look at the action. His daughter was married to Jews. Over time, you’d have Jews practicing White looking persons. Traditional Jews would be physically and mentally different from those mixed Jews. 

    It’s like comparing Mnuchin (pure jews) and Macron (mixed Jews). 
     

  221. Bill P says:
    @Aristotle1

    I do see it as a spiritual struggle, but I don’t see Judaism winning. These people you’re talking about aren’t really Jews; they’re lying about that. They aren’t Christians, obviously, but they’re fundamentally irreligious. The reason so many Jews stop seeking God and turn to the world instead is that Judaism is a flawed religion that is psychologically damaging to a lot of its adherents. Read Freud for some background on this. Did you know that circumcision is ritualized castration, because God is supposedly a jealous father? That’s just the tip of the iceberg.

    Even despite these problems, with great effort some Jews can still achieve a kind of closeness to God, although it lacks the reason and light Christ brought to the world. These people, however, will not be found anywhere near the levers of power you describe.

    The real struggle isn’t between Christians and Jews, but between truth and lies, knowledge and ignorance, brilliance and darkness. In truth, we should pity these powerful people for living in a spiritual void. Besides their stuff, what do they have? They trade in fear and coercion, theirs is an animalistic, unthinking world where cunning takes precedence over the light of reason, convenient alliance over friendship, and carnal hunger over love.

    • Replies: @Aristotle1
    , @Art
  222. Skeptikal says:
    @Francis Miville

    Actually, it was the Mongols who destroyed the brilliant civilization whose superbrilliant, sophisticated, worldly, learned capital was Baghdad, the political, intellectual, commercial, social—everything center of Islam.

    A hundred after the Mongols, the Crusaders entered the scene, then the Turks.

    Islam as it developed on the back of Arabian and Persian culture never recovered from the Mongolian genocide and civi-cide, plus the advent of bands of Turks from central Asia, even though the Turks ultimately were converted. .

  223. @Bill P

    Ok fair enough. We seem to be on the same page. This “relationship” has been going on for a few millennia and it has a while yet to run. I can see it ending in gulags in which I am much more likely to be placed than George Soros!

    So I wouldn’t pity them personally but I get where you are coming from.

  224. Sirius says:
    @Ogmios

    That is not strictly true. A racist is one who believes in the superiority of his own group and inferiority of others. It doesn’t matter whether the other group is a race or not. Of course, you are right that Muslims are not a race, but hating them can still be racist, although bigotry is probably a better word.

    There currently is no alternative word like “religionist”. Anyway it’s mostly a semantic argument.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    , @Art
  225. @Sirius

    That is not strictly true. A racist is one who believes in the superiority of his own group and inferiority of others.

    These days it’s quite common to get called a ‘racist’ for a hell of a lot less than that.

    But tell me something. I think the Japanese are superior to my group – totally convinced of it – but I like my group a thousand times more than I like the Japanese. Am I a ‘racist’ in your book?

    • Replies: @frankie p
  226. @Vojkan

    The inhabitants were in majority Serbian until the late 19th century.

    And they’re not now.

    You’re making my point for me that it’s a subjective determination whether one believes the present majority or the former majority should be favored.

    Besides, although the origins of Albos are shrouded by the mists of time, it’s perfectly possible that they’re the (largely intact) descendants of the Illyrians. If that could be proven, would you then renounce your claims on Kosovo (indeed, on all Serbia – after all, that land wasn’t empty when the Slavs arrived)? I kinda doubt it.

    If someone breaks into your house, expels you at gunpoint and declares to be the new owner, do you acquiesce or do you want to reclaim your property?

    If somebody does it to me, personally, I would certainly attempt to reclaim it. But if somebody had done it – so they tell me – to my great-great-grandfather, it’s not necessarily a wrong I would drop everything to right.

    Because it is a false analogy. The Khazarians who settled in Palestine are not the descendants of the Jews of Judea.

    I don’t think the Khazarian hypothesis is proven. But even if it were, it’s silly to pretend that Jews have no association to that land. Fuck me, it’s nuts the lengths some people will go to deny obvious realities. And they then have the gall to present themselves as objective to boot. Lol.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @Vojkan
  227. @techvet

    Do you really think anything “mainstream” at this point has our best interests at heart??

    In the context I was using it, it doesn’t matter whether it has our best interests at heart, it simply matters whether it’s true.

    Unless you subscribe to alternative quack medicine, I think you already agree with me on this.

  228. Art says:
    @Bill P

    They trade in fear and coercion, theirs is an animalistic, unthinking world where cunning takes precedence over the light of reason, convenient alliance over friendship, and carnal hunger over love.

    With all those menacing character flaws – the Jews have nukes.

    Scary – very scary!

    • Replies: @Bill P
  229. @Ugetit

    In the modern world the bravest surrender. What harm does it do your country to surrender? Your country gets nuked and ceases to exist if you don’t. You replace your failed system of government, and have a level of immigration nearly as high as at present, if you do. So what?

    Kaiser Wilhelm II could see Russia and France were preparing to attack Germany. He pleaded with them to desist but to no avail. He eventually mobilized his forces. What if he hadn’t? No WWI and no WWII. And Germany a larger country than today. He wasn’t brave enough.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  230. @AaronB

    Israel can exist, but not on land stolen from its ancestral owners, once called Hebrews and Canaanites, today called Palestinians.

    Buy up a corresponding region of the USA, every block of land there, corresponding area, only the new owners, Jews, living there, then tell the US government that Israel has the right to exist. How can they quarrel with that?

  231. Art says:
    @Sirius

    That is not strictly true. A racist is one who believes in the superiority of his own group and inferiority of others. It doesn’t matter whether the other group is a race or not.

    Racism is genetic or tribal based and unthinking.

    A racist is someone who hates another genetic identity people.

    A tribal hate is an essential part of racism.

  232. Lot says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    “ A better strategy is to compare Europeans to Palestinians who are being displaced in their own lands by hostile settlers.”

    Disgusting to compare Europeans in Europe with the various Arabs squatting in the land of Israel.

    Also disgusting to compare the valiant founders of modern Israel who defeated multiple much larger armies one after another with the illiterate diseased beggars streaming into Europe and signing up for welfare and molesting children in swimming pools.

    Israeli Haganah fighters, 1948:

    Muslim immivaders, 2016 Paris:

    NOT THE SAME!

  233. @AaronB

    The American extreme right seems to be saying – no Jews in our countries, and also no Jewish homeland.

    The late Larry Auster used to say about Duke and his disciples that they don’t want Jews to live in America because they’re an alien presence, and they don’t want Jews to live in Palestine because they’re an alien presence, and that when you get down to it, they don’t want Jews to live anywhere.

    That used to annoy me because I’m sure Auster was aware of various partition-plan proposals for the racial problem, in which it would seem perfectly possible that Jews could have a territory of their own in N. America.

    One of the problems with these “Birobidzhan” solutions is that the assigned territory has no emotional pull on Jews, so you’re left having to rely on push-factors to get them to aggregate there. But I think an ever bigger problem is that the white right is not even serious about partition. They continue to cling to the dream that every square inch of America can be reclaimed for the white man (and not just any crummy old run-of-the-mill white man, but the original and greatest Nordic variety – demographic realism clearly not being their strong suit).

    So Auster was probably correct to ignore partition and get at the heart of the white right stance on Jews, which really does seem to be that no accommodation with Jews is even theoretically possible. Jews are the one group of people on the planet, apparently, with whom no accommodation is possible.

    I have found them very reluctant to even discuss the issue. You generally get fobbed off with some line about “if Jews weren’t so Jewy, it wouldn’t be a problem, but they are, so it is.” Even if I press them on it, and ask what Jews could have ever done differently to avoid incurring this wrath, all I’ve ever gotten is some variation on this answer. The only exception* was one guy who was ancestrally half-Jewish (two Jewish grandmothers, so halakhically Jewish too, I gather) but raised Catholic and and extremely anti-Jewish told me that if Jews had just “left things alone” – if they hadn’t agitated for civil rights or immigration – everything would have been fine.

    * Another ‘exception’ is Greg Johnson, although he’s not really an exception since he isn’t anti-Israel.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Art
    , @Ralph B. Seymour
  234. Bill P says:
    @Art

    Do you think our leaders, or the Russians or Chinese, are really so different? These people at the top are for the most part godless men who are addicted to worldly power. I don’t think their ancestry plays much of a role in their personal values. All that matters to them is that they hold the advantage.

    • Replies: @Art
  235. AaronB says:

    Buy up a corresponding region of the USA

    ,

    Ok, but that’s what the Zionists did in Palestine. They bought up land legally. You’re still telling me that land was stolen.

    How do I know you won’t just say again we stole the land in America even though we bought it?

  236. Astaroth says:
    @Ugetit

    Agreed. Churchill was total scum. The worst, and by far the most destructive traitor in British history.

    • Agree: Ugetit
    • Replies: @Anon
  237. @Lot

    You misunderstand Genesis 12:3 because you haven’t read Galatians 3:16

  238. karel says:
    @Lot

    Where are you squatting?

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  239. Druid55 says:
    @Katrinka

    Why do christians like you want to be jews? Seems stupid to me considering what a nasty group they are. You see yourself in their shadow. Sick!

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  240. Art says:
    @Bill P

    Do you think our leaders, or the Russians or Chinese, are really so different?

    The average American or Russian does not have the character flaws that the average Israeli Jew does.

    The average Israeli Jew is all for the malicious treatment that is handed out to the Palestinians by their apartheid state.

  241. Druid55 says:
    @Lot

    On stolen land, stolen technology, stolen military might and a satanic no-morals “religion”!

  242. AaronB says:
    @silviosilver

    I think Jews had semi independence in the Pale of Settlement, but yeah, there would not be any serious pull for Jews to move there if we set something like that up in the US. Israel is where Jews feel a connection to.

    But even if exreme rightists moved Jews to independent enclaves by force, they would start accusing the new Jewish area of nefarious activities. The normal conflict between states would be blown out of all proportion. Problems in the white areas would be blamed on the Jewish enclave. Its cultural influence would be blamed on corrupting the youth of the white area from afar. You know how it goes.

    And if the new Jewish area was more prosperous than the extreme rightist area, forget about it. Already, Andrew Joyce is saying explicitly that giving Jews their own country would just make them act Jewy from there and is not a solution.

    I think the only solution that extreme rightist whites would accept, logically, is for Jews, wherever they live, to be powerless and without rights.

    A Jewish community that was powerless, poor, oppressed, without rights, forbidden good jobs or positions of influence, alone would satiate them. A flourishing independent Jewish state would enrage them and they would blame all their problems on it.

    So a partition doesn’t really solve the problem. Extreme rightists cannot tolerate, on this Earth, a free and flourishing Jewish community, even if no Jew lives in their country. They will blame all their internal problems on this Jewish country or enclave.

    This isn’t such an unusual stance. This was the stance of the Catholic Church in the middle ages, I believe, and this is basically the stance of the Muslim world towards us today and the root of our conflict.

    Probably, if I had to guess, at its heart is the psychological need of the son to kill his father in order to be free. Both religions feel they supersede Judaism. They have to kill Judaism – even if only symbolically by reducing it to inferior status – to come into their full maturity. Or so they feel. And the extreme rightists are the heirs to this tradition even if not Christian.

    But there is hope. The Church reformed. The Muslim world is becoming friendlier. The old attitudes will probably survive in dark atavistic corners of the culture.

    As for rational nationalists who approach Jews from a purely practical angle, there is no reason practical accommodations cannot be found. As long as you don’t have the old psychological hang up, you can be rational about it.

  243. Druid55 says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    Lol! The jevv media/ Hollywood/ art?, has been doing this for decades. You’re just a loudmouth!

  244. frankie p says:
    @silviosilver

    Why would we need to proclaim a race or people as “better”, when it’s clear that different races have different strengths and weaknesses, different characteristics? The important point that must be emphasized is that races and groups are different, and we need to call out the dissemblers who insist that race is a social construct and that there is only one human race. I admire the Japanese very much, and I have visited that country three times in the past five years and enjoyed myself very much. I admire the way that the Japanese are very comfortable with their own culture and civilization, and I wish I could see the same in my culture and people.

    Articulating race realism of this type is enough to be labeled a racist by the “woke”, but F*** them, and like “antisemite” and “hater”, these words are slowly losing their meaning. May they be put to rest soon.

  245. Art says:
    @silviosilver

    You generally get fobbed off with some line about “if Jews weren’t so Jewy, it wouldn’t be a problem, but they are, so it is.”

    Well!!!!!

    If the Jews want a welcoming place to live – they should clean up their act and become good citizens.

    What the Jews have done to American democracy is a crime against humanity.

  246. frankie p says:
    @AaronB

    Put the Jews in their new Pale of Settlement in the US, FORBID them from holding political office, participating in the financial sector, education of any type, and the media.

    The Byzantine solution would work well. Live long and prosper, but stop subverting our culture and civilization.

    Or move to Israel.

    The Resistance will take care of those who do that.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  247. But we are not in an American system in which anything can be said

    Which America is being referred to here?

  248. @Lot

    Haganah (and its offshoots Irgun and Lehi) were Jewish terrorist organizations that murdered Arabs, British and foreigners such as count Bernadotte. At Israel’s “independence” those terrorist gangs fused and formed the IDF, but of course its terrorist character remained. State terrorism is still official policy of Israel.

    And showing a picture of nordic looking Israelis does not do justice to Israel’s real racial character (not that I care). Here is a more representative picture of Israel’s ethnic make up :

  249. @AaronB

    “…Extreme rightists cannot tolerate, on this Earth, a free and flourishing Jewish community, even if no Jew lives in their country…”

    As a “non-extremist rightist” I can tolerate a flourishing Jewish state in Palestine, provided such a state behaves ethically, but here is the rub: Israel behaves as a rogue state. False flag terrorism such as the Lavon affair, the attack on the Liberty, 9/11, bombings in Lebanon, support for terrorism in Syria, kidnap of East European girls for prostitution in Israel, organ theft of murdered Palestinians, non-extradition of internationally wanted Jewish criminals, cruel over-reaction to rocket shooting from Gaza etc., etc. makes one less enthusiast for a Jewish state, “flourishing” or not. It is like allowing the Italian Mafia to have a state of their own and then expecting a different behavior from what they did for ages.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  250. AaronB says:
    @frankie p

    Put the Jews in their new Pale of Settlement in the US, FORBID them from holding political office, participating in the financial sector, education of any type, and the media.

    The Byzantine solution would work well. Live long and prosper, but stop subverting our culture and civilization.

    Okay, so we’ll have our own enclaves, and won’t hold any positions of influence in your society.

    Can you promise you won’t blame your internal problems on the new Jewish enclaves? That you won’t claim we’re corrupting and subverting you from afar?

    What if our enclaves end up being more prosperous than you – will you claim we cheated and demand we become poor?

    Are you really prepared to watch us live long and prosper in our enclaves if things go wrong in your areas?

    We already bought land legally in Palestine when it was a province of the Ottoman Empire. But now every one here is telling me that land was really stolen, despite hard cash being paid for it. Why won’t you start saying our new enclaves were really stolen land, if we start prospering and you’re having problems?

    • Replies: @frankie p
    , @Kapyong
    , @techvet
  251. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Ok, so in “practice” you’re not willing to tolerate a Jewish state.

    In theory, if Jews did not act assertively to defend their interests, you might tolerate it. But a Jewish state that, finding itself in a tough and violent corner of the world, acts decisively to protect itself, you cannot accept.

    So, isn’t this like what I said, where only a Jewish community that acts meekly, keeps a low profile, is not assertive, is one you could live with?

    A Jewish community that does not act with strength, is weak, low profile, etc.

    And remember – this isn’t a conflict that directly concerns you, yet you cannot tolerate Israel assertively standing up for itself.

    You cannot share this earth with an assertive and self-confident Jewish community, even if it does not directly impact you.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  252. Katrinka says:
    @Druid55

    You go to your church and I’ll go to mine.
    Who ever said that Christians want to be like jews or live in their shadow?
    Not me.

  253. Art says:
    @AaronB

    As for rational nationalists who approach Jews from a purely practical angle, there is no reason practical accommodations cannot be found.

    It is rational to demand that Jews be loyal to the community that they live within — clearly you American Jews reject that notion. Therefore we reject you.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  254. AaronB says:
    @Art

    Ok, so would a good practical solution be that we all move to Israel?

    If we are indeed a foreign element, what would you think about us leaving your societies and moving to Israel.

    Andrew Joyce thinks this would not work. He would like to blame any continuing problems within societies that have no Jews on Israel.

    Serious question – what is your vision of a good solution between Jews and white society? Assuming Jews remain Jews.

    • Replies: @anon
  255. frankie p says:
    @AaronB

    Aaron,

    Yes, I firmly believe that without usurious financial control, propaganda from the media, and toxic lefty education pushed by Jews, the western societies will be able to function for the good of their citizens.

    Stop your nonsense about buying land in Palestine. The Jews had bought approximately 6% of the land. This is historical record. Stop sending up a smoke cloud using words like “hard cash being paid for it”. The hard cash was paid to Ottoman Effendi landowners for 6%, and the rest was stolen.

    • Agree: Ugetit
    • Replies: @AaronB
  256. anon[294] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    a good solution between Jews and white society

    “Universal peace will reign over the post-modern global village where all of humanity lives … Even if our reason cries out to us with all its might the absurdity of this face to face between a tiny people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity … as absurd, as incoherent, as monstrous as it may seem, we are well engaged in an intimate combat between Israel and the Nations which can only be genocidal and total, because our respective identities are at stake. ”

    Itzhak Attia, Director of International School at Yad Vashem Institute, Israël Magazine (April 2003)

  257. @AaronB

    There is a difference between legitimate selfdefense and unnecessary crime and terrorism. Your insistence on Israel’s right to “assertiveness” (read: chutzpah) makes one to expect the worst.

    BTW, “Israel bought land from the Palestinians”, yes but only for 6,6%. The rest was stolen, together with other property and 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed.
    Do you still have an Old Testamental mentality à la Book of Joshua?

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @AaronB
  258. @Vojkan

    That may be so but what next for Kosovo? Will those churches and monasteries go the way of Aja Sophia and those in western Europe that are being converted to mosques? Considering the difference in the birth rates between Serbs and Albanians keeping them in Serbia would cause even greater problems in the long run and greater loss of territory. The thing is Western Europe didn’t have this kind of Balkan problem yet it allowed Muslim immigrants to settle and replicate much of this, just like the Yugoslavs allowing in exiles from Enver Hoja. There needs to be some major shake up on a vast geographical area, European wide or globally, for this to be put right, but in the meantime things just keep getting worse, at least for the parties we’re concerned with. White flight is a form of ethnic cleansing and resistance is illegal. Hard to be positive and optimistic.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  259. @silviosilver

    The Serbs had their Reconquista in the 19th and early 20th centuries but much of that is now lost thanks in no small part to US, EU, and the Jews who run them ganging up on the Serbs in favour of the Muslims. Many Serbs now have a feeling of satisfaction when they see Muslim enclaves arising in the West and the rapes and murders of Westerners by their Muslim pets – sort of serves them right. No solution in sight yet to all this.

  260. @Carolyn Yeager

    I tried to reach you at that cite. It is blocked. I don’t want to post my email here

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  261. Vojkan says:
    @silviosilver

    Besides, although the origins of Albos are shrouded by the mists of time, it’s perfectly possible that they’re the (largely intact) descendants of the Illyrians. If that could be proven, would you then renounce your claims on Kosovo (indeed, on all Serbia – after all, that land wasn’t empty when the Slavs arrived)? I kinda doubt it.

    Well, then the Irish, the Scots, the Welsh, the Galician have a better claim to Serbia than the Albanians as Belgrade and my hometown Niš were originally Celtic settlements. Besides, it is unlikely that the Albanians, especially those in Kosovo will be proven to be descendants of Illyrians, because you see, genetics,

    eupedia.com

    History as written by politics tend to do differ from history uncovered by archaeology and genetics. The former is mythology serving the winners, the latter is, well, science.

    If someone breaks into your house, expels you at gunpoint and declares to be the new owner, do you acquiesce or do you want to reclaim your property?

    If somebody does it to me, personally, I would certainly attempt to reclaim it. But if somebody had done it – so they tell me – to my great-great-grandfather, it’s not necessarily a wrong I would drop everything to right.

    Would you? You mean you wouldn’t claim back property that was allegedly stolen to your great-great-grandfaher by the nazis and that today has a completely different owner who didn’t acquire it at gunpoint? Obviously, Jews disagree with you. There’s a clause in the recently signed Serbia-“Kosovo” “peace” deal in Washington that stipulates that Serbia should transfer to Israel ownership of any property that was ever owned by a Jew in Serbia but was left uninherited. Btw, Kosovo wasn’t stolen to my great-great-grandfather, my father was born there, there’s a UN resolution that says that it is part of Serbia and in 2008 when it was officially stolen, my great-great-grandfathers were long dead, as were my great-grandfathers, two of them for almost a century, since WWI. So technically, Kosovo was stolen from me and from people who are very much alive at this time.

    I don’t think the Khazarian hypothesis is proven.

    Neither are the gas chambers. Except that regarding the Khazarian hypothesis, you have Marc Bloch, Abraham Polak, Arthur Koestler, Shlomo Sand, all Jews, so it actually holds more water than the gas chambers. But of course they’re self-hating Jews as all Jews who feel human before feeling Jewish are self-hating Jews.

    But even if it were, it’s silly to pretend that Jews have no association to that land.

    They’ve been gone for eighteen centuries. They have as much association to that land as Celts have to Serbia. Except that Celts aren’t a loony sect claiming to be God’s “chosen” people and entitled to rule the world and own whatever they wish wherever they wish.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  262. @AaronB

    You (since you identify with them) have found your solution to the JQ: Israel, ZOG, NWO and you run with it. I don’t blame you if it’s paying you good dividends for now. I don’t think you have to worry much about any of the hypothetical solutions on offer here as those proposing them are far from implementing them. Even that darling of the WNs, Mr. Trump, is your man. And I don’t think Mr. Putin would let you down if your very existence or survival were at stake. But if or when others start solving the JQ why should they care about whether you’d like or agree with their terms? Did you care about those you murdered in WTC on 911? No, you just blamed it on Arabs and Muslims. Did you care about those you murdered on the USS Liberty? No, you just covered it up. Well, expect the same when someone else tries to solve the JQ, blame it on aliens.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  263. Wielgus says:
    @Lot

    Propaganda picture selection.
    When they broke through temporarily in the Battle of the Bulge, German newsreels also liked to contrast “Aryan” German soldiers with shots of the African-American troops they captured (and in some cases the latter were killed although it was not as notorious as the killing of white GIs at Malmédy). Third Reich propagandists also were partial to focusing on Jewish or Asiatic-looking Soviet POWs, contrasting them of course with German troops.
    How odd to see a Zionist copying Nazi propaganda techniques.

    • Replies: @Lot
  264. AaronB says:
    @frankie p

    The Jews had bought approximately 6% of the land. This is historical record.

    Sure, and the Arabs also “owned” a small percentage. Most of the land was empty state land, as it is in most countries.

    In 1937, after the Arab Revolt, the Peel Commission decided that Arabs and Jews should be separated.

    The Jews were going to get the land they owned, plus a small amount of state land for natural growth. It was a tiny sliver of Palestine. The Arabs were going to get the land they owned, and the vast majority of the empty state land.

    The Jews still accepted, and the Arabs refused. And that was repeated in 48.

    Point being, none of the land was stolen or taken from any one. Now, when 5 Arab armies attacked Israel, that was definitely an attempt to steal land. And yes, as a result of that war, the Jews did acquire more land and Arabs did leave.

    But despite all this history, you characterize all of Israel as “stolen” land. So what’s to say you won’t just make stuff up when it comes to our enclaves in the US? You’ll attack us, we’ll defend ourselves and maybe take another river that is a strategic high ground, you’ll claim that’s stolen land, and everything in the original enclave is stolen land too.

    • Replies: @ivan
    , @AnonStarter
  265. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    There is a difference between legitimate selfdefense and unnecessary crime and terrorism. Your insistence on Israel’s right to “assertiveness” (read: chutzpah) makes one to expect the worst.

    Fair enough, but everything is a matter of judgement. If you don’t like us, you can easily just interpret normal self defense as “chutzpah”. Oh, you won’t say you don’t want us to exist, you’ll just claim the tiniest movement we make in self defense is really massive overkill, and anything our enemies to is perfectly justified.

    So in practice, any Jewish enclave will have to be very low profile and non assertive to escape your censure.

    BTW, “Israel bought land from the Palestinians”, yes but only for 6,6%. The rest was stolen, together with other property and 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed.

    I am sure that you know this is incorrct. The rest is made up of empty state owned land, and land acquired when 5 Arab armies attacked, trying to steal both Jewish owned land and empty state land given to the Jewish community for natural growth by international commissions (with the Arabs getting way more).

    Now, you may claim the land acquired in the war was “stolen”, but when you attack someone trying to steal his land, in my view, its fair if you fail and end up losing some of your own. And even in this war, most of the land acquired was empty state land awarded to the Arabs.

    This has a direct bearing on any Jewish enclave in America. You’ll attack us someday, we may seize a strategic ridge or two, and you’ll go on about how we stole all the land.

    Which brings me back to my original point. You won’t admit it, but in actual practice, you want a weak and powerless Jewish community, or none at all.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  266. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Yes, I don’t think I have anything to worry about, and honestly, I also don’t see anything that will change that anytime soon.

    I think this site is for emotional venting, which is healthy and good.

    But if or when others start solving the JQ why should they care about whether you’d like or agree with their terms? Did you care about those you murdered in WTC on 911? No, you just blamed it on Arabs and Muslims. Did you care about those you murdered on the USS Liberty? No, you just covered it up. Well, expect the same when someone else tries to solve the JQ, blame it on aliens.

    Ok, but this reinforces my point. You are not interested in coming to practical terms with us. You are not interested in practical solutions. You are interested in defeating us and imposing a solution on us, putting us in ghettos or extermination being the only two options.

    So OK, I won’t “expect you” to care whether I’d like or agree to whatever you try and impose on us. But then, I hope you also accept the consequences of your decision. War is war, and if it ends up not going your way, things may end up much worse for you than you perceive them to be now.

    War is always a gamble, which is why most people try to come to a reasonable accommodation if possible. But not always. Lots of times you just gotta slug it out. Sometimes you gotta go for all or nothing. The Palestinians and the Nazis also refused reasonable accommodation and took an all or nothing approach with us.

    Of course, I realize there is no prospect of you guys being effective now, but I enjoy understanding your psychology and exploring possibilities.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  267. @AaronB

    Yes, I want a “weak and powerless” Jewish community, just enough to survive but not much more, so that it cannot harm the rest of the world, because harming the world (hypocritically called “repairing the world”(Tiqqun Olam) is what Jews invariably do. You may have a territory to establish your own Mea Shearim plus some surrounding land to grow your own food, and that is it. For the rest you may spend your time musing about your “chosenness”, and wait for your illusory “Moshiach”, but leave us “Goyim”alone.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  268. Kapyong says:
    @AaronB

    But now every one here is telling me that [Palestine] land was really stolen, despite hard cash being paid for it.

    Bollocks.
    The vast majority was stolen by FORCE, with ethnic cleansing of 3/4 million locals amidst wanton mass murder, destruction and terror. Barely a few % of Palestine remains now, soon it will be all gone – an entire country stolen by force.

    I doubt there is a single person here who genuinely believes your bullshit. If you think anyone here will actually believe your lies, then you are a blind fool.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  269. AaronB says:
    @Kapyong

    Well why don’t we put some numbers on that.

    The 1948 UN Partition Plan gave Jews 56% of the part of Mandatory Palestine remaining after the British gave Jordan to the Hashemites.

    After the Arabs attacked, trying to seize the Jewish part, Israel was left holding 78% .

    So that’s a growth of 22%. Now, you may consider this 22% “stolen”, but I think its fair that you may lose some land if you attack someone and try and steal theirs.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @anon
  270. @AaronB

    I’m just stating how things are and could be, not necessarily that that is my position. I can also appreciate when you stand for your own and much of what you say about war, as well as agree that most of us posting here won’t achieve much with our comments. Yes, Jews and Zionists are on a roll at the moment. But here you are equating Palestinians with Nazis when I’d equate Israelis with Nazis.

    I gather that Jews want everybody to be emotional about the suffering of the Jews but don’t feel any emotion for the suffering of others; it’s just a ploy when they call for empathy with blacks, immigrants, etc. as it would seem they have no feelings for anyone but themselves. Your post seems to suggest that is so. But people in conflict tend to be like that, and you are in an eternal conflict.

    Whatever will happen to the Jews will happen, but you on a personal level do have other options. I gather you are an American so you don’t have to side with Israel and its crimes.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  271. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Thank you for being very clear on that. Its good that we are all clear about where we all want this to end up.

    I don’t find your stance so unusual. Its probably a dumb strategy for today, but its basically what the Church wanted in the Middle Ages, and what the Islamists want for us today.

    Its because there can be only one Chosen People. If Jews are prospering, neither you nor the Muslims can see yourselves as the Chosen Ones. So we have to go down for you to go up.

    Psychologically, it appears to be a zero sum game on your side. For us, a prospering Christian or Muslim world does not threaten our understanding of where we stand in the world and what our place is. Because you think your raison d’etre is to replace us, it must for you.

    The only way this will change is if 1) You succeed in reducing us to second class people so you can feel first class 2) you no longer need to reduce us to second class.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Vojkan
  272. @Achilles Wannabe

    This is blocked? https://carolynyeager.net/contact
    Shouldn’t be. Try again and leave it there. Only I will see it. Thanks.

  273. @AaronB

    Your basic assumptions are that: 1) you Jews are really “chosen”, 2) “chosenness” means being prosperous, 3) “Goyim” are jealous of the Jews because they themselves want to be “chosen” i.e. prosperous and the only ones.

    I don’t believe that is the case, I think “Goyim” dislike of Jews is because of Jewish misconduct and not because of jealousy. For example, George Soros is hated not because of his wealth but because of his financing of subversive movements on a global scale.

    You Jews seem to have no doubts about your “chosenness” and your categoric innocence.

    I find it funny that you still believe that “God” descended with smoke and fire on a little mountain on a little planet in one of the myriads of galaxies of this universe to make a “covenant” with a bunch of runaway slaves ordering them to invade a foreign country, slaughter all its inhabitants and rob all their pessessions and thus be for all eternity a “light unto the nations”. You must be really intellectually and morally primitive to be able to believe that. No, sorry, I don’t envy you.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Commentator Mike
  274. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I don’t believe that is the case, I think “Goyim” dislike of Jews is because of Jewish misconduct and not because of jealousy. For example, George Soros is hated not because of his wealth but because of his financing of subversive movements on a global scale.

    Ok, but then it should be OK for Jewish troublemakers to get out of your societies and form their own.

    The reason I went to the psychological level, is because you didn’t seem to want a practical accommodation with us.

    If this was just a practical issue, then you’d say like the European Nationalists, or like Hilaire Beloc, that Jews just shouldn’t be influential in white societies.

    So, are you prepared to have a prosperous, confident, and assertive Jewish country, on the condition that Jews are no longer permitted positions of influence in your society?

    I find it funny that you still believe that “God” descended with smoke and fire on a little mountain on a little planet in one of the myriads of galaxies of this universe to make a “covenant” with a bunch of runaway slaves ordering them to invade a foreign country, slaughter all its inhabitants and rob all their pessessions and thus be for all eternity a “light unto the nations”. You must be really intellectually and morally primitive to be able to believe that. No, sorry, I don’t envy you

    To be perfectly honest, Jews don’t think this stuff is to be interpreted literally. Well, some do, but the official Rabbinic position is that the literal meaning of the Torah is the most superficial, and if one stays at that level and does not probe into deeper symbolic meaning, you are practically not studying it.

    What do I think? I think there is a genuine historic substrate here, but it works mostly on the level of myth and symbolism, and us very effective on that level.

    The two great civilizations of the post-ancient Western half of the world, Islam and Christianity, found this myth so powerful that they sought to borrow it from us.

  275. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    But here you are equating Palestinians with Nazis when I’d equate Israelis with Nazis.

    I would describe the Palestinians as wannabe failed Nazis. Only this time, the would be victims are strong. The Palestinians were, of course, famously chummy with the Nazis. The Mufti of Jerusalem was a great pal of Hitler, and hated Jews.

    I don’t think the Palestinians were quite as extreme as the Nazis – they’d be satisfied with a weak, impotent, and oppressed Jewish community, and after the initial few massacres and rapes of Jews, things would settle down.

    I gather that Jews want everybody to be emotional about the suffering of the Jews but don’t feel any emotion for the suffering of others; it’s just a ploy when they call for empathy with blacks, immigrants, etc. as it would seem they have no feelings for anyone but themselves

    .

    I don’t think Jews deserve any more than the normal amount of human sympathy. The Holocaust will always deserve some level of special attention because it presents several unusual features that in combination, are perhaps unprecedented in history. So from a human pov it stands out, not just a Jewish. That being said, I certainly agree that it is waaaaay overemphasized and that it is shamelessly exploited by the leaders of the Jewish community. I myself would downplay it and not make it so important feature of Jewish history. I actually find it an embarrassing chapter in Jewish history, and I think its wrong to emphasize weakness. I prefer the heroic stuff. Many Jews agree with me. Chabad wrote an article saying emphasizing the Holocaust has a negative effect on retaining Jews and in attracting converts.

    Whatever will happen to the Jews will happen, but you on a personal level do have other options. I gather you are an American so you don’t have to side with Israel and its crimes.

    In such a scenario, my choice would be made for me. I would not be accepted by extremist rightists in America, no matter what I say or do. As a Jew, one misstep and I’d be in hot water. It would be a permanent vulnerability that would be exploited by any one who dislikes me. I would only be accepted if I kept a low profile, and did not have rights. Even then, in tough times, I’d be on thin ice.

    So you guys kind of back me into a corner here.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @anon
  276. “…So, are you prepared to have a prosperous, confident, and assertive Jewish country, on the condition that Jews are no longer permitted positions of influence in your society..?

    Yes I do, but also provided that that Jewish state behaves properly. For the rest, I don’t envy other people’s success.

    “…The two great civilizations of the post-ancient Western half of the world, Islam and Christianity, found this myth so powerful that they sought to borrow it from us…”

    That is the reason why I consider the post-ancient Western half of the world, to the extent that it too believes in that myth, also primitive.

  277. @silviosilver

    I frankly tend to agree with the “American extreme right”.

    And for a variety of reasons that have been endlessly stated in comments on this website.

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  278. ivan says:
    @AaronB

    The other land was the “commons” : Just as nobody owns the parks and forests which are part of the commons. But the commons were for the Arabs to use. Not for anyone to buy or sell. I am just correcting your misconception. I have little sympathy for the Palestinian per se, since it is a conflict between Arabs and Jews. I have always felt the solution was to let Israel be, instead of trying to destroy it. By what reckoning have the Arabs lands stretching from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean, while the Jews have none? The Jews are an historical people endemic to that region. If the Arabs can have the Khilafat, Pan-Arabism and such, why can’t the Jews have their own form of nationalism? Zionism is just the nationalism of the Jews.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @AnonStarter
  279. Vojkan says:
    @Commentator Mike

    The most important Serb monasteries and churches in Kosovo are on the UNESCO list so it will be hard to convert them into mosques. As for the strategy the Serbs should adopt with regards to Kosovo, it is simple, it is the strategy of frozen conflict, contain the Albanians so that they don’t spread further, never recognise Kosovo’s independence and wait, just wait. Kosovo Albanians’ economy is mafia money and foreign aid. Let’s see how that works out in the long term. That said, the most urgent for Serbs is to get rid of Vučić and his clique of former extreme nationalists turned globalists. If they stay in power then Serbia is likely to lose Kosovo permanently, and not only Kosovo.
    In a sense, Serbia has a lesser long term problem than that Western Europe and the USA have as it is unattractive to extra-European immigrants. In that regard, not being rich appears to be a blessing. In the last couple of weeks I watched a series on History 2 titled “The rise and fall of the Roman empire”. Western people are paying the price of the imperial dreams of their elites and if those elites are anything like the Roman elites, and imho there are striking similarities, they will lead the West to total ruin. If Western nations want to survive, they’d better start devising extra-institutional ways of organising themselves because they are effectively occupied territories with quislings at the helm.

    • Replies: @techvet
  280. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Except that George Soros got wealthy by crooked means, probably from day 1, informing on rich Jews to the Gestapo. And probably many others got rich through unethical business practices too. But sure, many non-Jews also got rich through questionable practices.

  281. techvet says:
    @Vojkan

    Zionism is the cancer. You don’t fight cancer by cosying up to it. Pandering to those who hate you will never earn you their love, only their scorn in addition to their hatred.

    is it any wonder those “elites” in the north east many of them being kosher (not in the traditional dietary sense if you know what I mean) have absolute contempt and disdain for southern evangelicals who send their boys (and now girls too, yay gender equality!!!) to die in the many myriad wars in service to IZ!!

  282. techvet says:
    @AaronB

    What if our enclaves end up being more prosperous than you – will you claim we cheated and demand we become poor?

    Are you really prepared to watch us live long and prosper in our enclaves if things go wrong in your areas?

    Outside of some NYC buroughs where the hasids assemble, most Jewish gated communities are, even now, vastly more prosperous and wealthy compared to where your average whitey lives. Heck, their new neighbors are increasingly the Hindus (H1B) and the Chinese (EB1), the former being just as clannish and cunning while the latter being just as money grubbing.

    Have any of these groups ever feared being “done in” by the left out founding stock as they are pushed outwell paying jobs and now good places to raise children?

  283. @AaronB

    I think the Mufti and some Palestinians and Arabs supporting the Nazis was the case of the enemy of my enemy.

    It wouldn’t be a problem if Jews behaved as regular citizens of other countries. Even their culture and their clannishness could be tolerated, but the fact is they work to the detriment of their hosts, and this is the main sticking point. The religious ones could live apart as the Hamish without any problems. But as things are now I’d kick most Jews and Muslims to the Middle East and cut all support to both.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @Ivan
    , @AaronB
  284. AaronB says:
    @ivan

    I would say the commons was for Jews and Arabs to use, every one who lived there. But when the two communities split up, each would have its own commons.

    Obviously what you say is what any normal person would think, but you know, I really don’t mind the Muslim attempt to conquer Israel that much. You can’t really defend it morally, but wanting to be an empire is an old human desire. Its human, if not really moral.

    But then own that. Be honest that you are frankly imperialistic. Don’t try and torture logic and language to make out some kind of “natural right” case why the Muslims get the Caliphate and Jews couldn’t buy land in Palestine legitimately and form a state on that plus a fair division of the commons.

    Zionism is just the nationalism of the Jews

    Of course. Its amusing to see how Zionist is starting to be used to describe the activities of Jews in America that one dislikes. I thought it was a Muslim attempt to piggyback off of the resentment of others and try and conflate the two issues.

  285. techvet says:
    @Vojkan

    with quislings at the helm.

    Those who appear to be “at the helm” are not really there. And those who really are, are not quislings. They know what they are doing

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  286. Luce says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    This is not cleaver thinking. One should point at the greater danger and the source of evil not at the consequences. This is what Soral calls fake opposition or national zionists. They crawl like worms in order to get crumbs of the Zionist cake. They are despicable cowards worst enemies of the nation they pretend to defend and more than anything they undermine the true patriots in their fight to regain control of the country. There’s a word to describe them: traitors

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @silviosilver
  287. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:
    @Astaroth

    Absolutely. Mr. Churchill was a fat, self absorbed cigar munching elitist, who couldn’t have cared less about the British people, nor most Europeans and in the end, wrecked the whole empire and influence Britain had in the world. Hitler’s wish was to preserve this empire, unite Europe and create a powerful Anglo Saxon world culture. Yes, he might have been somewhat crazy, yet genius he no doubt was and genius always hovers on that fine border between sanity and insanity. There isn’t the slightest doubt that his more negative of plans would have been ignored if such an alliance became a reality the reason being that, the majority of Germans and British people are just about the most reasonable people on earth. Not so distant blood relatives in fact.

  288. Anonymous[228] • Disclaimer says:

    France’s Macron

    In high-profile address, French president also said Paris would seek to ‘liberate’ Islam in France from foreign influences

  289. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    “The Palestinians were, of course, famously chummy with the Nazis. The Mufti of Jerusalem was a great pal of Hitler, and hated Jews.”

    Provide one source to confirm your stupid claims. Mufti even did not have face to face meeting with him .One source says he met onetime . Many more times the Jewish leaders of all stripes met with Hitler making deals and stabbing Germany .Many more time and and on an ongoing basis Jewish rabbi,moneylenders leaders and even prostitutes met with Nazi soldiers leaders and police forces .

    They still meet in Ukraine . They even have become de facto prime minister or president or the real puppeteer .They met happily with S African Nazi regime .

    • Agree: Iris
  290. Here is a famous photograph of the meeting of the Mufti with Hitler :

    https://images.theconversation.com/files/99369/original/image-20151022-8013-20jv53.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=1200&h=1200.0&fit=crop

    And here of his meeting with Himmler :

    • Replies: @anon
  291. Robjil says:

    Freedom of speech costs lots of (((money))) these days. Herve Ryssen’s “Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism” sells for 902.81 dollars at Amazon.

    Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism
    June 20, 2015
    by Hervé Ryssen (Author), Carlos Porter (Translator)
    5.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings
    See all formats and editions

    Paperback
    $902.81
    1 New from $902.81

    This book is only 90 pages long. Therefore it costs 10 dollars a page to read it. It is a summary of six books that Herve wrote from 2005 to 2010.

    This is a summary of six books written by Hervé Ryssen, published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

    The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  292. Dani says:
    @Rich

    Commentator Mike,
    Herve Ryssen’s work is excellent and I can’t tell you how much I’ve learned from him over the past several years. He does not express opinion – he speaks in truth and I agree with everything you’ve said here. What you have expressed here is not opinion, either. Clearly you have eyes to see and ears to hear and are fully aware of our reality.

  293. Vojkan says:
    @AaronB

    I confess that your “there can be only one Chosen People” sent me into a laughing fit. The initial capitals really stand out. There are zero chosen people. Only lunatics posit otherwise.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  294. Vojkan says:
    @techvet

    They are, as puppets, and they are quislings because they volunteer to be puppets.

    Regarding your other reply, the scorn of the “elites” is expected, the willingness of the scorned to sacrifice themselves halfway around the planet for the benefit of the elites that look down on them is not specific to US Southerners but is always mind-boggling. There are things for which there just isn’t a satisfactory rational explanation.

    • Replies: @techvet
  295. AaronB says:
    @Vojkan

    I was going to use There Can Be Only One from the old Highlander movies.

    I think we’re all chosen people. But you gotta start somewhere.

  296. @Vojkan

    You mean you wouldn’t claim back property that was allegedly stolen to your great-great-grandfaher by the nazis and that today has a completely different owner who didn’t acquire it at gunpoint?

    When I said “I wouldn’t necessarily drop everything” in order to prosecute my claim, I meant that maybe I’d do something about it, maybe I wouldn’t. I’d have to weigh up the situation as a whole, not merely assert the rightness of my claim and then spend the rest of my days pursuing it no matter what.

    When it comes to territory, every single country in the Balkans is dissatisfied with the present settlement to some degree – besides Serbia, there’s Romania with Moldova, Bulgaria with Macedonia, Macedonia with Greece, Greece with Turkey, Albania with all is neighbors – but some of them have largely put the past behind them while others remain stuck in the past. I lean heavily towards the ‘move on’ school of thought on the issue.

    Obviously, Jews disagree with you.

    Yes, in recent times they do. But for a far longer period of time they too “didn’t necessarily drop everything” in order to win back Israel, or even bother trying to live there. It was only with a combination of various pressures and opportunities that they reevaluated their stance.

    Btw, Kosovo wasn’t stolen to my great-great-grandfather, my father was born there

    My great-great grandfather comment referred to the period in which Serbs ceased being a majority in Kosovo. If being a majority is the criterion for deciding who a certain territory belongs to, then in 1912 Kosovo ‘rightfully’ belonged to Albanians. If you want to contest that, then in a sense you’re trying to right a ‘wrong’ that befell your great-great-grandfather, not you. (Insert however many ‘greats’ are necessary to get the generation correct.)

    And just to remind you once more: my purpose here isn’t to ascertain precisely who is right or wrong, only to argue that whichever way one decides, the decision will ultimately be subjective, that there are no objective standards which would compel one to see things one way rather than another.

    Except that Celts aren’t a loony sect claiming to be God’s “chosen” people and entitled to rule the world and own whatever they wish wherever they wish.

    My own view is that Judaism is a sick supremacist cult, so you’ll get no argument from me there. But nowadays it’s only orthodox scum who take it that far, whereas most Jews tend to be more reasonable about it (although they certainly retain a lot of the supremacist attitude towards the rest of us). If they want to retain some identity as Jews while ignoring the dafter religious aspects of it, I think it’s fair enough. After all, I too continue to identify with Christianity, even though rationally I don’t believe a word of it (in fact, I regard most of it as perfectly idiotic). Still, I don’t think any of this makes Israel somehow ‘cancerous.’ I’d sooner apply that label to the regimes in Saudi and Iran and Gaza.

  297. @Luce

    They crawl like worms in order to get crumbs of the Zionist cake.

    In reality, they’re just avoiding unnecessary complications. It’s hard enough to make the nationalist case as it is, so why complicate it with an extreme position on an issue – Jews – that the vast majority, at least for the time being, don’t even regard as pertinent?

    This is plain common sense to everyone except nutzis.

  298. Lot says:
    @Wielgus

    ???

    Israelis come in many shades of lovely!

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Wielgus
    , @Vojkan
    , @Anon
    , @WormPoop
  299. Franz says:
    @Eagle Eye

    Google is no less a public entity than the Social Security Administration or ICE. Even if these organizations were genuinely private, they remain subject to existing anti-trust law and common-carrier obligations to provide equal, unbiased service to all.

    I thought about this a bit, and it’s good food for thought. But.

    Google (etc.) were indeed set up with much help from the government, and for anyone to invoke antitrust on them, they would have to be motivated. Is the government/tech complex really motivated to police itself?

    I ask in all honesty because there are books that, as an independent seller, I cannot list on (say) Amazon because of their recent decrees. None of the books are hate screeds by any chalk, but no ruling made by these people ever changes. If anything, the government will badger Facebook and the others to be even more restrictive.

    Be good of them to play by their own rules. I don’t see much goodness in them. Maybe I’m too pessimistic.

  300. Art says:

    Serious question – what is your vision of a good solution between Jews and white society? Assuming Jews remain Jews.

    There is only one non-bloody solution to the Jew problem. That is that the Jews voluntarily give up the practice of abusing the minds of their young children. Jew elders fill little minds with hate and fear of the rest of humanity. When a five-year-old hears that humanity wants to kill him – his mind automatically becomes imprinted with a fear that is life changing. His little mind can not question what his elders have planted in his subconscious. For most Jews, those feelings remain till death. The separation between Jew and humanity is permanently infused in the Jew mind.

    That five-year-old is YOU – a person with ZERO honesty when it come to Jew matters. It is up to YOU to change your culture to the Western norms of empathy for all of human life. Your elders have abused you – they have robbed you of your natural human empathy.

    Arron – you are damaged goods – forever hateful and fearful – forever displaying your dishonesty – forever bringing the JQ to the fore – heal thou self.

    p.s. Your exclusive hate on “white” is telling of your elder induced subconscious sickness – people all over the world vote against Israel. (By your made-up bizarre terms, 7,000,000,000 people are anti-Semitic.)

  301. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Yid shades of lovely can’t overcome
    many shades of sadism, lesbianism,
    and Saul Pussyowitz-level bad breath.

    Real purpose of The Wall is to
    protect others from Yid gas.

    So kind of Yid

  302. @Ralph B. Seymour

    Lockdowns Motivated by Occult Doctrine: “Creative Destruction” (Kabbalah)

    https://www.henrymakow.com/the_destuctive_principle_of_th.html

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  303. @Ralph B. Seymour

    You’re like a mirror image of CRT.

    For CRT, the ‘white racist’ angle to any event, current or historical, is always the most important angle (even if it has to be imagined into existence).

    You’re simply substituting ‘Jewish’ for ‘white racist.’

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  304. “You will know who rules over you when you find who it is you are not allowed to criticize.” Quote sometimes attributed to Voltaire.

  305. @AaronB

    After the Arabs attacked

    The Deir Yassin Massacre occurred on April 9, 1948, well before May 15 of the same year, when you allege — as is your wont — that “the Arabs started it.”

    Arabs came in late, well after the implementation of Plan Dalet had begun and Palestinians largely driven from their homes or killed. Even records in Israel’s Akevot Institute corroborate this. In fact, Israel’s Ministry of Defense is so concerned about those records, they’ve undertaken a concerted effort to suppress them:

    In an interview with Haaretz, Yehiel Horev—the former head of the Malmab department tasked with censoring material—was asked why material was systematically hidden, especially when several key documents had already been cited in a variety of published historical works.“Isn’t concealing documents based on footnotes in books an attempt to lock the barn door after the horses have bolted?”the interviewer asked. In his response, Horev made a case for undermining evidence and attacking the very concept of truth.“If someone writes that the horse is black, if the horse isn’t outside the barn, you can’t prove that it’s really black.”

    So, no … The Arabs didn’t initiate the conflict. Jews did.

    And that’s a matter of record Israel is desperately seeking to conceal.

  306. @Commentator Mike

    About 12,000 Palestinians served with the Allied Forces during WWII. The Mufti’s ascent to authority was made possible by the British, not Palestinian consensus.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
  307. Ivan says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Mufti had blue eyes. This no doubt sent both Hitler and Himmler into a tizzy as they tried to figure out if he was an Aryan brother. The simpler explanation that the Mufti had Crusader genes somewhere in his bloodline.

    Mufti bro was a right on eliminationist as far as Jews went. Raised some dedicated divisions of jihadis for the Nazis with the rallying cry of destroying the Jews and such like.

    Can’t blame the Jews for

  308. @ivan

    The other land was the “commons” : Just as nobody owns the parks and forests which are part of the commons. But the commons were for the Arabs to use.

    Neither the British nor the Jordanian authorities who held sway over Palestine sought to abrogate the Ottoman Land Code as a means by which to determine ownership of such land, and it is this same code that sets forth stipulations by which Palestinians may claim said ownership. Even Israeli courts recognize this criterion in principle, if not in practice:

    Under the Guise of Legality: Declarations of state land in the West Bank

    • Replies: @ivan
  309. @AaronB

    Re: Peel Commission proposal, you write

    The Jews were going to get the land they owned, plus a small amount of state land for natural growth. It was a tiny sliver of Palestine. The Arabs were going to get the land they owned, and the vast majority of the empty state land.

    The proposal would have displaced more than 200,000 Palestinians from their homes. That’s hardly “state land.”

    Ask anyone here if they’d agree to give up their home to a demonstrably belligerent party.

  310. techvet says:
    @Vojkan

    There are things for which there just isn’t a satisfactory rational explanation.

    Not to be too distracting but that is how I feel about many many corn bred white girls sticking with their drug addled / boozed boyfriend/husband who almost always physically abuses/batters them to no end (mostly black but also quite a few white men who do this). Bad boy attraction?

    Yet they stick with them. Perhaps a fatal flaw with the naive young female psyche seeking sado masochism or something?

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  311. Wielgus says:
    @Lot

    Like Leni Riefenstahl’s Olympia?
    They all look like Ashkenazim, not Mizrahi Jewesses who tend to be darker, and of course there are no Arabs.
    As to the pulchritude aspect, Ostrovsky notes seeing young female IDF conscripts, perhaps like these, brought in to have a sex party in a swimming pool with senior Mossad officials on one occasion. The latter were generally paunchy and unsightly (all were naked) but some of the conscripts were stunning. Ostrovsky talked to one of the Mossad high-ups afterwards and expressed the sarcastic hope that his exertions had not caused him to put his back out. We are kind of into Epstein territory, of course, if not Weinstein. I wonder whether female IDF enlisted personnel could refuse to have sex with bigwigs from Mossad, or perhaps IDF officers, without it being considered a breach of discipline or have other negative consequences.

  312. Vojkan says:
    @techvet

    Women are by definition irrational beings. No rational being would want to endure the pain of giving birth. God hasn’t created women for men to understand them, God has created women for men to love them, with passion.
    The three words I dread most hearing from a woman I court are “you understand me” because what they really mean is “you’re a good guy, I like you but I’ll never have sex with you”.
    Don’t get my word for it though, I’m a confirmed bachelor and when I do some honest introspection, I force myself to admit that the problem is in me and my inclination for being over-rational, and women just don’t like that.

  313. Ugetit says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    You know what? I agree with a lot of what you’re saying, especially your brief summary of the origins of WW1, which is excellent. I also wonder what I would have done in Hitler’s situation.

    Here’s what I see as wrong with your first paragraph. First, it’s too broad. One simply cannot say that the bravest surrender because, for one thing, a lot depends on how strong you are. For instance, if you are strong, it can do great harm to both your country on the people of the world for your country to surrender as we can see by the fact that today’s USA is a chaotic cesspool which it showed itself to be under Wilson and FDR where it not only surrendered to, but appeased and supported, evils which have festered even to this point.

    Second, it seems a generally a poor idea to knuckle under to threats partially because it encourages those who make such threats to increase their demands. We can see this by the obvious fact that people generally submit to government dictates just to get along, then the next thing you know, a whole society is enslaved and under the heel of psychopathic morons.

    I don’t get what you’re saying in the 4th sentence and this comment is already too long, so I’ll quit here.

  314. Vojkan says:
    @Lot

    Cute, but if one’s to judge by how RBG evolved in time, they’re like Beaujolais Nouveau, they give headaches while they’re young and turn sour faster than they age.

    • LOL: Lot
  315. Ugetit says:
    @karel

    Where are you squatting?

    He squats here a lot. His type squats all over anyone, everywhere they can apparently for the sadistic pleasure of it and leaves the mess for someone else to clean. It’s coming to the point, as it typically does, where they’ll be introduced to the idea of squatting responsibly or else and I think he realizes it which explains the whining and baiting he thinks he’s so clever at.

    For his sake I hope he gets it out of his system soon…

  316. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Mandatory Palestine taken via aggression and duplicity.

    UN can’t give to Yid what is not theirs to give.

    Yid aggresion began with first Yid foot step in Palestine
    and first Yid political aggression in Europe to take
    Palestine by politics and force via others.

    Yid the snake and spawn of the Snake.

  317. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I think the Mufti and some Palestinians and Arabs supporting the Nazis was the case of the enemy of my enemy.

    Well, as Ivan points out, it went far beyond that. The Mufti agreed with many of the Nazi positions on Jews. It wasn’t a case of reluctantly forming a temporary alliance with an unsavory regime to fight a common enemy. They admired each other and shared many ideas.

    It wouldn’t be a problem if Jews behaved as regular citizens of other countries. Even their culture and their clannishness could be tolerated, but the fact is they work to the detriment of their hosts, and this is the main sticking point.

    Well, liberal Jews do the same thing in Israel. Israel has many liberal Jewish organizations that try and undermine its ability to defend itself and object to its character as a Jewish state.

    The new unapologetic self-confidence Israel has in defending itself really only developed after the failed Oslo accords, when even liberal Jews saw that the Palestinians were not seeking reasonable compromise but the total destruction of Israel. Also, the large Russian Jewish influx helps keep the country realistic, combined with the large Jewish population from Arab lands, who have communal memories of dealing with Arabs.

    So let us grant that Ashkenazi Jews, wherever they are, will have a disproportionate number of people who try and undermine traditional institutions. It seems less an ethnocentric thing than an attraction to abstract ideals over concrete reality. This may be an innate limitation of high IQ people who emphasize abstract thought over the concrete, as the Northern Europeans are also disproportionately this way. High IQ Asian cultures have a rich tradition of emphasizing the concrete over the abstract (Zen, Taoism) – which perhaps developed early as a recognition of the dangers of abstract thought.

    Either, wouldn’t an ideal solution be to send them to Israel? They will be out of your hair, and the realities of life there will quickly sober them up.

    But as things are now I’d kick most Jews and Muslims to the Middle East and cut all support to both.

    I can understand that reasoning. But then, wouldn’t Israel be the perfect solution?

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  318. anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @lysias

    Yes he would. So would De Gaulle, for that matter.

  319. anon[831] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I am waiting to see Anne Frank ’s picture with Hitler . Barring that what about the pictures of Swastika and Star of David flying high together in proud eternal ideological bondage in the air on the ship sailing to Palestine . Time to republish it.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  320. @AaronB

    Hajj Amin al-Husseini wasn’t representative of Palestinians on the whole:

    When Palestinian Arabs and Jews fought the Nazis side by side

    Prof. Mustafa Abbasi, a historian at Tel-Hai Academic College in northern Israel, has found that some 12,000 Arab Palestinians volunteered to serve in the British army during the Second World War in North Africa and Europe, often fighting side by side with Jews. Abbasi’s findings were published in a recent issue of the Cathedra periodical, titled “Palestinians Fighting the Nazis: The Story of Palestinian Volunteers in World War II.”

    “Many of the [Arab Palestinians] lost their lives, others were wounded and many are still missing,” Abbasi’s research reads. “It appears that an important and central portion of the Palestinian public believed that it was necessary to stand on the British side, to postpone nationalist demands, to fight as one against the Germans and their allies, and to demand recompense at the end of the war.”

    Israel has many liberal Jewish organizations that try and undermine its ability to defend itself and object to its character as a Jewish state.

    In the case of Israel, it isn’t that a group like B’Tselem is trying to undermine its ability to defend itself, it’s that it acknowledges Israel’s routine transgression of the Geneva Conventions. In other words, Israel doesn’t behave like the liberal democracy you yourself have claimed it is.

    I recently read a piece penned by none other than Benny Morris in which he tries to make your argument for Arab aggression being the spark that ignited the Palestinian conflict. I looked for the earliest example he could give in which a call to martial jihad was made by any Palestinian and found a suggestion offered by a visiting speaker of the Iraqi parliament in 1936.

    But we know the Jewish Hashomer had declared its intent to wage war against Arabs in the first decade of the twentieth century, establishing the following phrase as their slogan: “In blood and fire Judah fell, in blood and fire Judah will rise.” The writer and critic David Frishman admitted the Hashomer served more to provoke Arabs than to defend Jews. By the time Palestinians got wind of the Balfour Declaration, it was quite clear they were being subordinated to Jewish hegemonic ambition.

    As such, any Arab retaliation that occurred after the fact was an entirely rational response.

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @AaronB
  321. Lot says:
    @AaronB

    “ but the American extreme right seems to have taken an anti-Israel stance”

    You spend too much time on Unz. The “American extreme right” is also the most extremely Zionist element of the American population.

    And maybe you haven’t noticed, but a large share of the writers here hate both America and American conservatives and gleefully root for China, Iran, Russia, etc in our various conflicts.

    • Agree: AaronB
  322. Lot says:
    @AnonStarter

    “ earliest example he could give in which a call to martial jihad was made by any Palestinian”

    Muslims, the eternally innocent Dindus Nuttins.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  323. @Lot

    The closest Jewish equivalent to the Islamic concept of jihad is cherem. This term is used in the O.T. for Joshua’s genocide of the people of Jericho and all other Canaanites, who had to be exterminated on the order of the Israelites’ tribal demon-god Yahweh himself. Whatever one may think of Islamic jihad, it never entailed genocide. Judaism is the only religion in the world that espouses genocide as a divine command. Something to be proud of!

    • Agree: AnonStarter
    • Replies: @AaronB
  324. @anon

    Comrades in the same struggle :

  325. AaronB says:
    @AnonStarter

    1936? Arabs were attacking vulnerable Jewish communities in the 1800s.

    But we know the Jewish Hashomer had declared its intent to wage war against Arabs in the first decade of the twentieth century, establishing the following phrase as their slogan: “In blood and fire Judah fell, in blood and fire Judah will rise.”

    I don’t see where this talks about conquest or offensive violence of any kind.

    It just means the Jewish community will have to defend itself against Arab aggression. Achieving independence and a fair division of the land in the face of Arab aggression won’t be a walk in the park. There will be blood and fire.

    That you’re making so much of this one phrase suggests you couldn’t find any clearer phrases from the mainstream Jewish community that they had planned to aggressively expand from the first.

    That the Jews accepted in 37 such a tiny sliver of original Palestine, and accepted again the 48 partition, should put to rest any claim they planned from the first aggressive expansion. That after 67 they right away offered to return nearly all captured land likewise. And of course the other two offers to return 94% and 98% of captured land.

    Aggressive expansionist states don’t act like that.

    Now, elements of the Jewish community were sometimes willing to exploit opportunities created by Arab aggression to expand. But you have only yourselves to blame for that. And even in these cases, only in a modest and limited fashion. After 67 Israel offered to return nearly everything, except some strategic high ground needed for early warning. And then later offered 94% and 98% of land captured.

    It would have been easy in 67 to expel the Arab population of the West Bank. The Arabs were expecting it. After WW2 exchange of ethnic communities was a common and accepted way of solving conflict. It would not have been seen as outrageous at the time.

    But they didn’t. Some expansionist stare, Israel is.

    But Arab rejection of reasonable compromise and violent attempt to take it all has been the catalyst for each expansion of Israel so far. And continues to be. You could not compromise – in the end you will get nothing. We compromised at every step of the way. We bent and swayed instead of remaining rigid. Bending is the path of life and rigidity the path of death.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  326. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Without getting into the technicalities of the moral aspect of that, the Jewish version is very limited in scope. It applies to very specific people on a specific and relatively small piece of land in a very specific time.

    It is not a general desire to subjugate mankind, just acquire a national home. As such it is no threat to the world.

    Jewish nationalists can cooperate with other nationalists. Imperialistic Muslim cannot cooperate with other nationalists, except as temporary realpolitik.

    Hence the famous “bloody borders” of Islam, from Thailand to Europe, whereas if Israel had Thailand as a neighbor there would be peace.

  327. Wally says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Here we go, parasites graphically depicted:

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  328. @AaronB

    Arabs were attacking vulnerable Jewish communities in the 1800s.

    Not really.

    That isolated incidents against Jews may have occurred is certain, but they certainly weren’t a regular feature of the landscape as Israel’s terrible treatment of the Palestinians is. By and large, the Jews of Palestine lived much more peacefully alongside Arabs in the nineteenth century than they did after First Aliyah immigrants arrived with blood and fire in mind.

    That you’re making so much of this one phrase suggests you couldn’t find any clearer phrases from the mainstream Jewish community that they had planned to aggressively expand from the first.

    Oh, we have, but you dismiss those out of hand as “unreliable” without explaining how they are unreliable. You argue that I cherry-pick quotes, yet in order to prove how this is so, you would need to provide documentary evidence that I’m not framing the material I present in its proper historical context. Unfortunately for you, you’ve admitted that you won’t do this, so my evidence stands uncontested.

    That the Jews accepted in 37 such a tiny sliver of original Palestine, and accepted again the 48 partition, should put to rest any claim they planned from the first aggressive expansion.

    Here, you don’t apply the very method you accuse me of ignoring: considering the comprehensive sum of facts. We have to bear in mind that Palestinians were willing to accept parity in government under the British Mandate as early as the 1920s. From Ilan Pappe:

    The Mandate’s structure was the facade of an independent state that was in fact a colony, with one exception in the case of Palestine: local government had to be based on the principle of parity. At first, between 1923 and 1928, the Palestinians rejected parity. The Zionist leaders, using an efficient intelligence service, reciprocated by consenting to parity, although it was a far cry from their dream of a Jewish state in Palestine. Their consent was given as long as they were confident that the Palestinians would reject it. The Zionist position changed in 1928, when the pragmatic Palestinian leaders agreed to the principle of parity in a rare moment in which clannish and religious differences were overcome for the sake of consensus. The Palestinian leaders feared that without parity the Zionists would gain control of the political system. The unexpected Palestinian agreement threw the Zionist leaders into temporary confusion. When they recovered, they sent a refusal to the British, but at the same time offered an alternative solution: the partitioning of Palestine into two political units.

    So we see that the first partition proposal came about as a result of the zionist rejection of parity. (Albert Einstein corroborates Pappe.) Zionists were willing to accept a proposal so long as they could dictate its parameters, and the parameters of the initial partition proposal were so egregiously inequitable that, once implemented, they would have displaced over 200,000 Arabs from their homes. The ’47 Partition Plan was even more inequitable.

    It’s also quite settled among the new historians of Israel that the Yishuv never had any intention of resting upon their laurels had Arabs accepted any partition proposal. Your argument against this has always been that diary entries or personal correspondences don’t constitute evidence, which is obviously too ridiculous a statement to be taken seriously.

    We have to admit that zionists were smart. They knew how to wage the propaganda war rather well, and their PR machine was well oiled. They also knew the world was watching them, so they had to be wise about what they did in the public eye. Considering all of this, your best and brightest historians concur that Israel was, in fact, strategically expansionist, exploiting every opportunity it could to seize increasingly larger amounts of land.

    Ze’ev Maoz has essentially proven that every war Israel fought after 1948 was a war of choice, and the vast majority of accredited historians agree with this assessment, rendering all talk of “generous offers” entirely moot.

    Basically, zionists have nobody but themselves to blame for the animus they confront. There’s really no justification for their accusations of anti-Semitism and especially no justification for criminalizing people such as Hervé Ryssen. To the extent they continue to do so, they’re just sowing the seeds of their own destruction.

  329. @AaronB

    “…It applies to very specific people on a specific and relatively small piece of land in a very specific time.

    It is not a general desire to subjugate mankind, just acquire a national home. As such it is no threat to the world…”

    Agreed, it was no threat to the world, but of course it was GENOCIDE of the Canaanites, and as such deprived the Jews of any moral claim to be “a light unto the nations”. Still to make that claim is mere chutzpah of the Jews.

    (The Jews are not alone in such shamelessness, Americans are also good at it. They claim their nation to be “a shining city on the hill”, while it was acquired by murder and ethnic cleansing, often inspired by that very Old Testament in which a similar crime was glorified).

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @AaronB
  330. @AnonStarter

    Early Zionists claimed not only the whole of Palestine, but also South Lebanon, the Golan, and a great part of (Trans) Jordan:

  331. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Here is a symbol of the original territorial ambition of the Irgun:

    • Thanks: AnonStarter
  332. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Here’s the thing …

    The notion that zionism is concerned solely with the acquisition of Greater Israel and nothing more does not consider the totality of Talmudic law in its disposition to Gentiles. No, that law is not content with claiming the Promised Land from the Nile to the Euphrates, it also necessitates vigilant endeavor to subordinate Gentiles posing a potential threat to Israel.

    Here’s where the interpretation of a “threat” becomes significant. The current anti-boycott and “hate speech” legislation being advanced in America is a good example of how such interpretations are manifest in today’s world: even entirely factual statements and legitimate criticism of Israel are considered threatening to Israel’s existence.

    Indeed, domination of the world beyond Israel is mandated to ensure that such “threats” are neutralized.

  333. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Actually, if you examine the basis of their ambition more closely, you’ll discover they’re gunning for a lot more:

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  334. @AnonStarter

    About 12,000 Palestinians served with the Allied Forces during WWII.

    This is the first I’ve heard of this. What became of them? Did they plan a notable role in 1947-48?

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @Wielgus
  335. @AnonStarter

    It’s also quite settled among the new historians of Israel that the Yishuv never had any intention of resting upon their laurels had Arabs accepted any partition proposal. Your argument against this has always been that diary entries or personal correspondences don’t constitute evidence, which is obviously too ridiculous a statement to be taken seriously.

    I agree completely.

    I may side with Israel, but I’m not going to lie about it. The Zionist leadership, as a whole, was crystal clear about the need for a Jewish majority, and the need to war on and expel Arabs to achieve it, since immigration alone was not going to do the job.

    Aaron happily eschews liberal principles when and where he feels he can get away with it – this site is conducive to such thinking, after all – but he still tries to justify Israeli actions in the kind of terms that liberals would accept. It can’t be done. In liberal terms, it was a colonialist enterprise from the beginning and continues to be one down to the present day.

    • Agree: AnonStarter
    • Replies: @AaronB
  336. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I can see why you would see it that way. It definitely does not look good from an outsider perspective.

    And there is no point getting into it, unless you’re particularly interested, in which case I’m willing. We don’t have to like everything about each other, but we all live on this earth, so it may make sense to try and reasonably get along despite not understanding or liking everything about each other.

    Point is today, no Israeli has any desire to conquer England or France. They limit their ambitions to Israel. And there is nothing in Judaism today about anything beyond Israel either.

    That can’t be said about Muslims or Islam. Lots of Israel is visit and live in England and Germany and Amsterdam, and cause no trouble.

  337. AaronB says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Early Zionists wanted all of British Mandatory Palestine, which included all of today’s Jordan.

    In the beginning, all sorts of ideas were floated. It wasn’t clear in the beginning what the Arabs would accept. It was an evolving situation, with a lot of misperceptions.

    But this doesn’t mean they were willing to use violence to get it, or they were willing to disposses anyone, or they wouldn’t settle for less. Some factions were, of course.

    In 37, they accepted about 7% of Mandatory Palestine. So…

  338. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    It is not a general desire to subjugate mankind

    But yet that is what they do. And if this wasn’t a kind of dogma, why do some rabbis tell us that the Gentiles exist to serve the Jew?

    whereas if Israel had Thailand as a neighbor there would be peace.

    Vomit. The name of Israel’s neighbor doesn’t matter.

    This is like saying that if Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc did not exist, Washington would be a peace loving country.

  339. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:

    All this comes even as the French political-media class has again celebrated Charlie Hebdo’s right to “blaspheme,” at least where the Christian and Muslim religions are concerned. Je Suis Charlie for thee, but not for me.

    The desecration of the fundamental right to free speech, thought and opinion is bad enough. But the utter hypocrisy is so flagrant and gross. And it happens all the time, over and over.

  340. @silviosilver

    What became of them?

    The usual: death, wounded, M.I.A., with a handful of veterans to boot.

    Did they plan a notable role in 1947-48?

    Good question. It’s difficult to tell, as they didn’t constitute a single unit. I’ll have to research this matter further.

    https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/When-Palestinian-Arabs-and-Jews-fought-the-Nazis-side-by-side-593052

  341. AaronB says:
    @silviosilver

    I’m trying to show that Israel was more moderate, willing to compromise, and liberal than the Arabs. And that the Arab rejection of reasonable compromise is frankly imperialistic.

    The Arabs couldn’t let the Jews be independent on 7% of Palestine. That’s far less liberal and more colonialist.

    Every state is somewhat amoral and contains illiberal elements. But some states are much more liberal than others, much more willing to reasonably compromise than others, less cruel to their enemies.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @silviosilver
  342. @AaronB

    Thais have had problems and wars with neighbouring Buddhist Burmese and Cambodians throughout history and you’d expect them to live peacefully with neighbouring Jews.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  343. AaronB says:
    @AnonStarter

    Israel 5 times agreed to limited borders. In 67 and twice after that, Israel offered to return most of the land it won in that war.

    To me, this shows beyond doubt Israel had limited ambitions. They may have been more than you’d like them to be, but they were limited to even as little as 7%. You may think that’s too much even. I’m ok with that. You want to claim these were “fake” offers and Israel secretly planned on expanding anyways, I’m also fine with that.

    Everyone has to make up their own interpretations.

  344. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    They limit their ambitions to Israel. And there is nothing in Judaism today about anything beyond Israel either.

    But this doesn’t mean they were willing to use violence to get it, or they were willing to disposses anyone, or they wouldn’t settle for less.

    I’m trying to show that Israel was more moderate, willing to compromise, and liberal than the Arabs. And that the Arab rejection of reasonable compromise is frankly imperialistic.

    Bizarro world and insanity.

  345. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Good point.

    Everyone seems to be fighting everyone all the time. Its the human condition.

    I think any two countries next to each other will have some kind of war given enough time.

    But post WW2, it seems many states are capable of living in relative peace, with the notable exception of those bordering Islam.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Commentator Mike
  346. Steve De'ak says: • Website
    @TGD

    Israel was giving Vanunu street-cred by incarcerating him. The same way the USA is giving Assange street cred. This is what controlled opposition looks like.

  347. Anon[289] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Islam is militant branch of Judaism. Aside from Judaism being Islam’s root, its theological structure and aims closely match that of Judaism.

    Islam is inherently anti-civilization because it is inherently pro-murder. It neither allows the sin or sinner to exist, but instead looks to eradicate both. The end result of which is both a breakdown of civilizational hierarchy and attempts at mass murder. Which is why the strictest Islamic states aren’t completely isolated will inevitably degrade into warlord fiefdoms. Each of which will be a sinner or devil in the eyes of the other.

    Mainstream Jewish institutions promote the existence of Islam in Europe and the US, via immigration advocacy and political protection.

    In doing so, they are forcing an eventual breakdown of law , order, and therefore civilization in order to meet the threat of people whose cultural structure is inherently anti-civilization and murderous.

    See the wanton Islamic terrorism that is its natural logic. We can regulate it with law and order to a certain point, but there will be a tipping point at which reactionary punishment no longer works within the confines of civilization to stem murder to enough of a degree that civilization can continue to exist as a worthwhile endeavor. At that point, law, order, and therefore formal civilization will be suspended to meet the need for preemptive elimination of murderers.

    When that occurs, Jewish prophecy of the end of Nations will be fulfilled in the war that follows. By the specific method that Jewish prophecy / rabbinical commentary says that it will (a war with Islam on European soil).

    I assume that, by that time, there will be enough Islamists and Africans in Europe so that the war eradicates all political structure. If not, I assume that those who have stated that they have something to gain from this war of European eradication will provide whatever is necessary, in addition, to make the war’s result catastrophic to the degree required.

    Islam would not be a problem for the West without its Jewish protection.

    “Everyone seems to be fighting all the time” is, outside of military decisions, almost 100% due to Press propaganda and agitation.

    Most of the Press is Jewish owned and managed.

  348. @AaronB

    But post WW2, it seems many states are capable of living in relative peace, with the notable exception of those bordering Islam.

    As far as whites go, the breakup of the USSR, Warsaw Pact and Yugoslavia has brought an end to that peaceful phase. There were wars before Jews and where Jews were of no influence but as far as Europe and the Middle East go they seem to play a major role, directly or behind the scenes. But yeah, I guess being a Jew you can have a hard time dealing with all these accusations. Let’s see: Jews cooperated with Nazis to assist emigration of Jews to Palestine and at the same time Jews declared war on the Nazis. It would seem contradictory, or is it two different factions of Jews acting differently, but then on a deeper level it could all be one and the same. And of course many ordinary Jews also end up suffering in this turmoil started by their elites.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  349. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    There were wars before Jews and where Jews were of no influence but as far as Europe and the Middle East go they seem to play a major role, directly or behind the scenes.

    I don’t have a problem with that. Jews were an important sector in European society. Of course they will be involved in a major way in European wars.

    Likewise the Middle East. Jews will be involved in wars in that region.

    This was a very general remark. If you could make it more specific I’d be able to give a more specific response.

    Jews cooperated with Nazis to assist emigration of Jews to Palestine and at the same time Jews declared war on the Nazis. It would seem contradictory, or is it two different factions of Jews acting differently, but then on a deeper level it could all be one and the same

    What’s the contradiction. Jews wanted to save Jews from the Nazis. So they cooperated with them where possible to assist in the emigration of Jews to Palestine.

    At the same time they fought the Nazis where possible. If the Nazis were willing to cooperate with Jews on some occasions to get Jews to Palestine, of course they should take the opportunity.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @Anon
  350. @AaronB

    Because israeli jews will never renounce the asistance that diaspora jews provide them against all the iaraeli enemies and that power is more secured in a multiracial multicultural west according to diaspora jews , so wharever they say both are directly or indirectly validating the disposesion of europrans from our ancestral land , its the same fake oposition republican or democrats display in the congress

    There is no posible agreement with jews they have gone to far in their mesianic dream to stop now .

  351. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    What reason(s) would anyone have to criticize Yid?

    Haaretz

    Jewish Soldiers and Civilians Looted Arab Neighbors’ Property en Masse in ’48. The Authorities Turned a Blind Eye

    Refrigerators and caviar, champagne and carpets – a first-ever comprehensive study by historian Adam Raz reveals the extent to which Jews looted Arab property during the War of Independence, and explains why Ben-Gurion stated: ‘Most of the Jews are thieves’.

    “Refrigerators and caviar, champagne and carpets – a first-ever comprehensive study by historian Adam Raz reveals the extent to which Jews looted Arab property during the War of Independence, and explains why Ben-Gurion stated: ‘Most of the Jews are thieves’”
    “We turned a mahogany closet into a chicken coop and we swept up the garbage with a silver tray. There was chinaware with gold embellishments, and we would spread a sheet on the table and place chinaware and gold on it, and when the food was finished, everything was taken together to the basement. In another place, we found a storeroom with 10,000 boxes of caviar, that’s what they counted. After that, the guys couldn’t touch caviar again their whole life. There was a feeling on one hand of shame at the behavior, and on the other hand a feeling of lawlessness. We spent 12 days there, when Jerusalem was groaning under horrible shortages, and we were putting on weight. We ate chicken and delicacies you wouldn’t believe. In the headquarters at Notre Dame, some people shaved with champagne.””

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.highlight.MAGAZINE-jews-looted-arab-property-en-masse-in-48-the-authorities-let-them-1.9201926

  352. Sue says:

    France will be destroyed from within, and from without.

  353. The problem is that everyone beneficiate from living in the jewish dominated west except europeans thenselfs , africans muslims and hispanics could never of attaining such prosperity by thenselfs and asians enjoy the status of being an elite minority in the best well payed regions of the west like california .

    Look at the suicide rates of european america 2 to 5 times higher that the european counterpart while asians up to to 3 times less suicide rate in ametica than in their native countries

    https://ibb.co/KxMkT2b
    https://ibb.co/yYL0TZx

    Europeans have became the cow that is being leeched to death

  354. So is not only jews but the mayority of non euro have implicitly accepted the jewish world order as the lesser evil

    We are completely alone

  355. @AaronB

    I’m trying to show that Israel was more moderate, willing to compromise, and liberal than the Arabs. And that the Arab rejection of reasonable compromise is frankly imperialistic.

    The problem is that that is all bullshit.

    The Jews were not at all serious about any halfway compromises. They knew damn well the deceitful game they were playing and the Arabs were right not to trust them.

    Now, in my book (and in yours, I gather), that’s fine. Sometimes ya gotta do what ya gotta do. But there’s no way to square that with liberal values.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Bored of liars
  356. @AaronB

    What I meant is that the Jews may have declared war on Germany in a headline of a British newspaper to provoke more hatred, persecution and deportation of Jews in line with the Zionist agenda.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  357. ivan says:
    @AnonStarter

    Yes that is true, but the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was part of the history of the world including the two world wars. One cannot just isolate Israel and say its formation was uniquely evil. In fact it was less son than in many other countries. People were displaced all over the world during those wars. The Indo-Pakistan partition led to the displacement and deaths of millions. Yet no one either side is holding on to a “right of return”. I think the so-called “right-of-return” has some traction only because the Israelis were a Western society in its beginnings, and as is normally the case subject to guilt-mongering. The Israelis and the Arabs have to live with each other and the way to start is from what is the reality today, instead of a make-believe past.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  358. Its a matter of survival there is no posible compromise with yahve and their acolites , we have everything to win reveling against current order and very little to lose .

    HEIL HITLER!!

  359. Wielgus says:
    @silviosilver

    There was a Transjordanian Legion on the Allied side, with British officers. Glubb Pasha was their commander. They played a key role in defeating a pro-Axis Iraqi army in 1941. In the 1948 war Jordanian troops with that background were the most formidable Arab fighting force and inflicted several defeats on Zionist troops.
    It could be said they were Jordanians, not Palestinians, but the West Bank was in Jordan until 1967 and some Zionists have claimed the Palestinians are Jordanians who simply refuse to accept it.
    That you don’t hear so much about this Legion, and much more about the Mufti, is because it is convenient for some to present Arabs, Palestinians, Jordanians etc. as pro-Axis.

    • Thanks: AnonStarter
  360. AaronB says:
    @silviosilver

    The Jews were not at all serious about any halfway compromises. They knew damn well the deceitful game they were playing and the Arabs were right not to trust them

    Some Zionist factions were, the mainstream was not.

    So why didn’t the Arabs accept the compromises, revealing to all the world the duplicitous nature of the Zionists, earning them the sympathy of everyone?

    Imagine if the Arabs had accepted 37 and 48, and the Jews had been the ones to violate it. Or the offer after 67, or in the 90s.

    Besides, the language the Arabs used made clear their objection was to Jewish independence in any part of Palestine.

    Its strange behavior, rejecting a compromise and insisting on getting it all, because you think the other side isn’t sincere, and going to war on the suspicion that your enemy isn’t sincere. And it isn’t the reasons they provided.

    They themselves said they did not want to compromise. AnonStarter consistently produces arguments for why he thinks the Arabs should not have compromised one iota.

    Zionism was a mixture of liberal and illiberal elements. Liberals have a tendency to compare to an abstract ideal of perfection, but one should compare to the alternative. The Arab alternative is much less defensible in liberal terms.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  361. AaronB says:
    @Commentator Mike

    That’s rather tortured logic.

    The Nazis were persecuting Jews, but the Jews declared war on Germany so they will persecute Jews and get them to Palestine.

  362. @silviosilver

    There is no point of arguing with jews anymore , the mask are off .

    Jahve must be destroned or the slavement of humanity is secure

  363. Anonymous[283] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Imagine if the Arabs had accepted 37 and 48, and the Jews had been the ones to violate it. Or the offer after 67, or in the 90s.

    It’s 2020. And it’s the same disingenuous talking points.

    You guys are absolutely incorrigible.

    Humanity weeps.

  364. @Rich

    Hell, it’s no different in America. Israel and its perfidious lobby AIPAC do their utmost to stifle criticism of the Zionist entity, they push for outlawing (!) the BDS movement. . . .

    I have no doubt that the Israel Lobby would love to criminalize speech critical of Israel.

  365. Anon[196] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Yes, they share the individuals with stolen German genes for the magazines. Though, there is plenty of mixed blood from Jewish men in that photo. The average unmixed Jewish woman looks quite different from most of those.

    I’m curious as to how many German babies went missing as Jews exited Europe for Israel. No one who pays attention to Jewish genetics, whatsoever, believes that women like Bar Rafaeli came from Jewish and not German stock. To believe otherwise is to believe that a cow can birth a horse.

    And isn’t that the real reason that Jews can’t part with the German Nation that despises them to death? It would separate them too far from their Tree of Life that is the Northwest European gentile woman and her genetics.

  366. Anon[343] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    So why shouldn’t Palestinians fight the Jews as the Jews fought the Nazis?

    Germany is the German nation, not the Jewish nation. Jews would not allow that.

    Why should Jews be allowed to proclaim righteous ownership of Israel if Jews would not permit Germans righteous ownership of Germany?

    The Jews illegally murdered the Palestinians and without provocation. The World knows it.

    That doesn’t bode well according to the beliefs of Judaism that have their root in the rule of Law. Jews have sinned and broken the second Law in front of God, and have broken the first law of civilization.

    Jewish propaganda to the contrary is flagging because it was always an obvious lie. The trial isn’t looking good. Jewish false persecution of others outside of Israel doesn’t help the Jewish case.

  367. Anon[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Disgusting to compare Europeans in Europe with the various Arabs squatting in the land of Israel.

    He’s not comparing race. He’s comparing process. But you know this and are being deceitful, as is typical and necessary for concealers and defenders of the obvious Jewish hate of Europeans.

    He’s comparing both Europeans and Arabs being targeted by Jews for replacement, either or both through political and militarily influence.

    Jews wish to displace both Europeans with Islam and Africans in Europe, and Arabs with Jews in Israel.

    Your deceitful attempt to re-arrange his sentiment is assists with your condemnation.

    Also disgusting to compare the valiant founders of modern Israel who defeated multiple much larger armies one after another with the illiterate diseased beggars streaming into Europe and signing up for welfare and molesting children in swimming pools.

    In spite of your storybook-tier adjectives, why?

    The process is parallel.

    Jews aren’t Europeans in spite of you finding a picture of one that resulted from a Jewish man defiling a European Woman or gender vice-versa.

    In both arenas, Jews are largely behind the displacement.

    WWII was fought by the Germans in an attempt to prevent such an Islamic and African invasion as well as communism, at the hands of Jews (just like Islamic invasion of Europe was assisted by Jews in prior centuries) and the Jewish Power fielded a mutt Army of Americans and defeat that effort instead of allowing Germans their German land.

    The Jewish role in that anti-White War is refeceted by Jewish anti-White political influence in Europe today, which has a large role in ushering in as many Arabs and Africans as politically possible.

    In contrast to how Jews expect to be allowed what they claim is Jewish land.

    • Agree: annamaria
  368. @ivan

    Yes that is true, but the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was part of the history of the world including the two world wars.

    One of the reasons international law exists is to provide for a common basis of adjudicating disputes between and among contemporary polities. The other partition you mention is a done deal, which does not speak to its equity, but rather to the fact that the polities subject to its mandate have long since consented to its finality and the legal consequences thereof.

    Not so Palestine, where, to this day, Israel refuses to declare fixed borders and Palestinians continue to struggle for self-determination. Israel demands recognition that it won’t give to Palestine, which is the root of the problem — one standard for itself, and another for its neighbor.

  369. Interesting piece here:

    No, Israel Didn’t Offer to Trade the West Bank for Peace in 1967

    Gorenberg cites a number of Israeli sources who decisively debunk the post-’67 hasbara that’s been a favorite of the usual suspects for lo, these many years.

  370. Hrw-500 says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I guess it’s doubtful then Family Guy could do that joke again.

  371. Ron Unz says:
    @Katrinka

    Here it is on Internet Archive for free:

    https://archive.org/details/UnderstandingTheJewsUnderstandingAntiSemitism

    I was only very slightly familiar with Ryssen, and since that condensation of his six previous books was so short, I decided to spend a couple of hours reading it.

    It had lots of interesting and useful information, but I do think that Ryssen should be more careful with his facts, especially on such controversial subjects.

    For example, he discusses Jewish influence across various important industries, and names many hundreds, perhaps even thousands of individual Jews across the 96 pages to illustrate his points. The ethnic background of the overwhelming majority of those individuals was already known to me, but some of the high-profile names he cited really surprised me since I’d been pretty sure that they weren’t Jewish. Unfortunately, when I checked, quite a number of them turned out not to be, at least as far as I could tell.

    Here are just a few examples: Hollywood directors Alan Parker, Peter Weir, and the Wachowskis, Greek Director Constantin Costa-Gavras, former World Bank President Robert Zoellick, German proto-Communist Karl Liebknecht, and various others.

    Certainly a substantial majority of the names whom I hadn’t previously known were Jewish did indeed turn out to Jewish or at least part Jewish, but when you discover a 30% error rate, you stop being able to rely on the author, and checking every name for yourself obviously defeats the entire purpose.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
    , @Wielgus
    , @m___
  372. Vojkan says:
    @Ron Unz

    Very often to enhance the proposition that the West is in fact a Jewish dictatorship, people who aren’t Jewish are said to be Jewish, but what if they were? I’m not a fan of the Wachowskis, but there are films by Alan Parker or Peter Weir that I like. The Coen brothers are definitely Jewish and I definitely like their films. Spielberg’s films are not my cup of tea but I certainly won’t deny him talent. If I look at Jews from the past, my favourite violinist is David Oistrakh, I like Frank Capra’s films, I like Gershwin’s music. Should I “cancel” them because I detest Soros, Dershowitz, Wolfowitz, Abrams, Boot, Albright, Bernard-Henry Lévy? Should I cancel listening to Bach, Beethoven, Brahms because Germany is chronically hostile to Serbs?
    That a detestable ideology portends contemporary collective Jewish behaviour seems hardly deniable. You just don’t fight a negative ideology with another negative ideology. You don’t fight the devil by behaving like the devil. Aginst negative values, you need positive values. If you think that people won’t believe them it is because you don’t truly believe in them yourself. You don’t know what every single individual on Earth thinks. Maybe many of them just lack the courage to state it because they are uncomfortable with going aginst the herd and maybe they’ll get the courage when they realise that there are many others like them. Maybe they won’t, maybe they’ll reject positive values, so be it, they aren’t worth fighting for. Live and let live. If they don’t let you live, be ready to fight for your life.
    But for Christ’s sake, stop whining. Men don’t whine, men fight, not necessarily with arms but they fight.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  373. Alfred says:
    @nietzsche1510

    Thank you, President Mitterand, for setting the Tribe´s cats among the French pigeons.

    Correct.

    Mitterand is the one who nationalised private banks in France. These Jewish banks had moved all their good assets to other entities. But they kept on the books all their bad and fake loans. That was a huge gift to the Rothschilds of France. With the money they were given for banks with a negative net worth, they moved to New York and made a mint.

    Mitterand also allowed North Africans who were brought in to work in the car industry and to build nuclear power stations – to the advantage of the big capitalists – to bring all their relatives from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. Their supposed “dependents”

    I hope the soul Mitterand is burning in Hell!

    In this historic photo, Mitterand is with the German Chancellor Kohl. Merkel was the gofer of Kohl. She only became chancellor of Germany because all those ahead of her in the succession were eliminated one way or another. She is pure CIA – like Obama.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  374. Wielgus says:
    @Ron Unz

    Liebknecht was not Jewish. It may have been why his body was simply abandoned in the street and left in a morgue as the body of an unknown man. Luxemburg, who was definitely Jewish, was thrown into a Berlin canal – perhaps suggesting an extra element of contempt for her compared to Liebknecht.

    Weir is a fairly common Scottish name but a Frenchman might possibly think it was Jewish, like “Weil”.

    It does seem as though Ryssen sees Jews everywhere – a rather common feature of this website.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Fox
  375. Robjil says:
    @Wielgus

    This book is a short version of his writings.

    As the Voljkan mentioned, we live in a Jewish dictatorship since 12.23.1913.

    There are many Shabbos Goys who promote Jewish uber alles values in films. They have no choice. Their films would not be allowed to be made. Look at Mel Gibson. He was harassed endlessly for making a film that our Jewish rulers disliked.

    In this small book, the author does not state that anyone is Jewish. He only points out the Jewish uber alles values massively promoted by the filmmakers, writers, or other such influential people over the past hundred years. That is my take on this little pamphlet book.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  376. @Vojkan

    Ultimately it doesn’t matter whether they’re Jews or not but whose agenda they’re serving. Non-Jews serving the Zionist and globalist cause are worse than some Jews who are opposed to it. Even those Orthodox Jews, obnoxious though they may be isolated in their ghettos, unfriendly and uncooperative with the goyim, probably do less harm (although many of them seem to engage in criminal and abusive activities) than the shabbaz goy Masons, politicians, media and entertainment personalities, academics, etc. all working on the programme as laid out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, knowingly or unknowingly. Goys like Trump, Obama, and the two Bushes have done more for Israel than countless Jews. And there are far more crypto Jews around than people are aware of and some have buried their origins well enough to never be unmasked.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  377. Vojkan says:
    @Alfred

    Mitterrand did put Jews in many key positions. However, as bad as he was, you can’t blame him for mass immigration from Africa or “family regrouping” – “regroupement familial” in French -, that was the work of Giscard and his globalist “centre-right” shills. The replacement of native French by muslim immigrants in suburbs was in full gear already before Mitterrand. I was there when it happened.
    You can’t blame Mitterrand for the empowerment of the financial sector either, that started under Pompidou. The decline of France started with the departure of de Gaulle and though Jews have contributed to it in a major way, the French must blame themselves first.

  378. Robjil says:
    @Robjil

    Correction,

    he does sometimes say people who are Jewish in his book. For instance,the suicides of famous Jews. For films, he often doesn’t mention if they are Jewish or not. He gives a short description of many films that promote Jewish uber alles values. Many of these filmmakers are Shabbos Goys. They have to be to get their film done. Thus, I should change the word

    anyone

    to

    everyone

    .

    In this small book, the author does not state that anyone* (everyone) is Jewish. He only points out the Jewish uber alles values massively promoted by the filmmakers, writers, or other such influential people over the past hundred years. That is my take on this little pamphlet book.

    The bizarre thing about this book, is that it sells for over 900 dollars at Amazon. It is only 90 pages.
    Why is Jan. 1 1823 in this title on Amazon? The book is a ten dollars a page.

    Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism by Herv?? Ryssen (2015-06-20) Paperback – January 1, 1823
    5.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings
    See all formats and editions

    Paperback
    $902.81
    1 New from $902.81

  379. Vojkan says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Agree. It’s easy to blame Jews for everything. There certainly are a lot of loathsome characters among them. They may have an opportunistic outlook on shabbos goyim’s lack of moral values but the latter are to blame for that, not Jews.

    • Replies: @Art
  380. Aberrant.

    But let’s face it; France stopped being French since the Judeo-Masonic-British coup masqueraded as the “French Revolution.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  381. Fox says:
    @Wielgus

    Liebknecht’s mother was a full Jew; hence, he is a Jew in the rabbinical conception, a half-Jew in the ethnological or racial sense. I don’t know whether he was subject to Jewish mores and upbringing. In your opinion, being born in Germany of racially German parents makes one liable for accepting the swill poured over Germans for more than a hundred years now by people within Germany such as you and outside. How do you classify then people in general?

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  382. Vojkan says:
    @Hiram of Tyre

    France has had several surges of national spirit since then but May 1968 was the blow that sent it into the coma in which she is currently vegetating.

    • Replies: @Hiram of Tyre
  383. dotmpe says:
    @anonymous

    Those “ritual similarities” are pretty much all that matters! And btw. all thats left of em now is some corrupted cube/astrology worshipping madness. Wether Jew or or their lost cousins. where the hell is that logic you speak of?

    I think worshiping any chaos lord–you know the ones that hate the world and man and try to sell gullible minds they will bring order by their magic holy spirit/mind/breating/xxx/… powers–is very much inversely related to sound mind and good morals. Maybe if you think emotionally raping kids, or submission to the darkest of feminine passions is good and beautiful… yeah maybe then.

    As for low-life.. well, its nice how one can glance this from a theological position. Just that nullifies any arguments. Not that you have much to add to a discussion.

  384. Wielgus says:
    @Fox

    I live in Greece although I speak German and visited Germany early this year, navigating Covid restrictions. I do happen to have Polish ancestry.
    Do you think it was right for Polish workers in the Third Reich to have to wear discriminatory badges with a P in purple on a yellow background? The yellow was probably chosen to create an association in German minds with Jews. The colours white and red were avoided as these might encourage Polish nationalism – they wanted Poles to be pariahs but not nationally conscious ones.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_(Nazi_symbol)

    Polish males who had sexual relations with German women were hanged. The German women got off more lightly – they merely had their head shaved and were sent to a concentration camp for having defiled the German race.
    The sign translates as “I am the biggest pig in the place, I had relations with Poles.”

    Is that “swill” in your view? Or is it an accurate reflection of how the Third Reich was run?

    • Replies: @Fox
  385. Fox says:
    @Wielgus

    There you had another rant.
    I commented on your statement about Liebknecht, and not on Poles.

  386. annamaria says:
    @neutral

    “…the French political-media class has again celebrated Charlie Hebdo’s right to “blaspheme,” at least where the Christian and Muslim religions are concerned.
    Je Suis Charlie for thee, but not for me.”

    Yes, this is a show of talmudic contempt for any other law but talmud. At the same time, the talmudists love parasitizing on western law. The problem is, the talmudists cannot help themselves but destroying the countries of their residence.

    Here is another atrocious sigh of zionist power showing right now at the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons OPCW). The zionist idiots want Eretz Israel by any means. https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1313197827712049158?s=20

    The Russian Federation, the incumbent president of the United Nations Security Council for the current month of October 2020, wanted to hear the testimony of Brazilian diplomat José Mauricio Bustani, former director-general of the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons), regarding the evolution of the institution. However, Belgium, Germany, Estonia, the United States, France, and the United Kingdom opposed the motion. [Bustani was removed from his post for his honesty. Bolton’s intervention included threats to Bustani and his family].
    This is the first time in the history of the United Nations that a witness called by the President of the Security Council has been challenged by other members of the Council.
    On 23 October 2013, the Courage association released the investigation of a group of seven experts, including José Bustani, concluding that the OPCW report on the chemical attack in Douma (Syria, 7 April 2018) had been falsified by the general secretariat; namely by the Director General of the Organization’s the chief of staff, the French diplomat Sébastien Braha. Subsequently, the OPCW’s statutes were amended on a proposal from France to enable the Western members to block any discussion.

    https://www.voltairenet.org/article211074.html

    Add to that the presstituting Netflix chef-d’oeuvre of “White Helmets.”

    https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/12/19/chemical-weapons-watchdog-is-just-an-american-lap-dog/

    • Replies: @annamaria
  387. annamaria says:
    @annamaria

    More on the perfidious zionized propagandists: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7793253/PETER-HITCHENS-reveals-evidence-watchdog-suppressed-report-casting-doubt-Assad-gas-attack.html
    https://steemit.com/news/@caitlinjohnstone/media-s-deafening-silence-on-latest-wikileaks-drops-is-its-own-scandal

    This new WikiLeaks drop includes an email from the OPCW Chief of Cabinet Sebastien Braha (who is reportedly so detested by organisation inspectors that they code named him “Voldemort”) throwing a fit over the Ian Henderson Engineering Assessment which found that the Douma incident was likely a staged event. Braha is seen ordering OPCW staff to “remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever” from the organisation’s secure registry.

    The Zionists’ outrage over the emerging truth about the US/UK war crimes in Syria explains the fate of the former director-general of the OPCW Bustani (he was threatened by Bolton himself with harming Bustani’s children) and the fate of Assange who is kept in a high-security prison for exposing the criminal conduct of OPCW’ bosses.

    The ho-representatives of Belgium, Germany, Estonia, the US, the UK, and France oppose any investigation of the obvious criminal behavior of Sebastien Braha.

  388. @Vojkan

    Almost forgot about May ’68; very true.

    It is safe to say the global coup started in the ’60s.

  389. @Bill P

    As for Israel, I don’t really know, but I can’t see it having such outsized regional power forever.

    It could, but that would require facts on the ground. Territorial conquest followed by forcible conversion. Not happening for as long as Uncle Sam is the dominant power in the region. Oddly enough, it’s the US keeping Israel down.

  390. @Wally

    Don’t worry, she is just getting tough protection from COVID together with a respirator. She was first offered a hijab and she refused despite the fact she was originally Egyptian from Alexandria. So she is wearing a veil but according to state of the art technology.

  391. Moi says:
    @HyperDupont

    You might have mentioned France and her former colonies. The French suffer from an illusion that they are special. No way.

  392. Anon[742] • Disclaimer says:

    Non supremacist jews, wake up and smell the coffee. Put aside your childhood brainwashing. What do you think will happen across Europe as the Germans wake up to having been slandered for generations? Save yourselves, save the world. Lead the attack on the talmudists and their holocaust lies.

  393. Treg says:

    When the the Right in the USA and Europe was first accused of being bigots by the Left, they destanced themselves from standing up for the principle of Universal Free Speech.
    Once they did that, the Left continued to redine bigory as simply anything and everything on the Right. This all goes towards what David Horowitz once said, “You can’t bring a book of manners to a knife fight or you’ll die of a thousand cuts”. The Right needs to either defend the principle of universal Free Speech for All, or it must start attacking Leftism as Hateful ideas that cant be spoken and should be jailed.

  394. AndrewR says:

    Jesus France is gay. May Allah smite them.

  395. Art says:
    @Vojkan

    It’s easy to blame Jews for everything. There certainly are a lot of loathsome characters among them. They may have an opportunistic outlook on shabbos goyim’s lack of moral values but the latter are to blame for that, not Jews.

    In both Hollywood and congress, the Jews dictate who sharpens the pencils.

    If you want to play – you pay with your integrity – end of story.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  396. annamaria says:

    A tangential story about billionares-fed media (presstitutes) smearing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who dared to pronounce some inconvenient truths. https://www.globalresearch.ca/billionaire-media-smearing-robert-f-kennedy-jr/5725810

    Toronto-based The Globe and Mail newspaper published an extraordinary and very lengthy article vilifying Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “How a Kennedy became a ‘superspreader’ of hoaxes on COVID-19, vaccines, 5G and more.”

    … the article made no mention of Kennedy’s Jr.’s August 29 speech in Berlin, where he addressed a huge rally. He told them that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “crisis of convenience for the elites” who are “destroying the middle class,” “using the quarantine to bring 5G into our communities” for “surveillance and data-mining”, and shifting us all “to digital currencies” and a cashless society that will benefit “the billionaires.”

    The [smearing] article was originally published by Tortoise Media… Emily Bell, the director of a digital journalism center at Columbia University ’s graduate school of journalism, wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian. She noted that mainstream media is under financial “pressure” … “There is an acceptance that billionaires might be the answer after all,” wrote Bell in her praise for the Tortoise approach.”

    Tortoise Media’s funding partners include two of the wealthiest billionaires on the planet: Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.
    Of course, that should remind Canadian readers that The Globe and Mail (which published the Tortoise Media piece) is owned by the richest family in Canada, the Thomsons, “who have seen their fortune increase by nearly $9 billion during the pandemic, up to $50.6 billion from $41.7 billion in March. …

    https://www.forbes.com/profile/david-thomson/#7e8968065628

  397. m___ says:
    @Ron Unz

    Jew intellectuals do everything to add to the opaqueness. White and census in US territories is self-explaining in that sense.

  398. Vojkan says:
    @Art

    Then keep your integrity, don’t play. Boycott Hollywood, boycott congress, boycott the Jews. Or stop whining.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  399. annamaria says:
    @Vojkan

    The incomparable US Congress: https://www.moonofalabama.org/2020/10/why-us-elections-do-not-change-its-foreign-policies.html#comments
    Comment, posted by bob sykes | Oct 8 2020 18:04 utc | 25:

    The testimony of Lt. Col. Vindman before the House Intelligence Committee explains it. He testified that the President does not have the authority to direct or change foreign policy. That authority resides in the bureaucracy. Since Vindman was a sitting senior Army officer, that testimony constituted mutiny, normally a capital offense. Following that speech, he was fired from his job as National Security Council director for Europe. The US Army still tried to promote him to Colonel, but Trump intervened and prevented it. Following the Army’s up or out rule, Vindman retired, unpunished. No one was punished. The reality of the Deep State was laid bare.
    … Modern Presidents struggle against the Deep State. Sometimes they win because the Deep State itself is divided: DoD vs. DoJ vs. FBI vs. CIA vs. NSA vs. White House staff vs. … Then there is the matter of Israel. Israel enjoys the open support and obedience of some 300 to 400 members of Congress (out of 535), and those congressmen routinely support all of Israel’s wishes regarding the Middle East. The US Congress is a whole-owned subsidiary of the Israeli Knesset. Discipline is enforced by Israeli-controlled media and the donations of rich Jews.

    The inevitable question is, are zionists the Deep State? Do mega-financiers and mega-war profiteers in the US/UK/EU own the ‘western democracy?’

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Vojkan
  400. Art says:
    @annamaria

    The inevitable question is, are zionists the Deep State? Do mega-financiers and mega-war profiteers in the US/UK/EU own the ‘western democracy?’

    Face it folks – Deep State power has won over elective democracy! Elitist leftist socialist power has won the fight to control democracy.

    There has not been a day sense he was elected, that Trump has not had the Deep State working against him. There has been a rolling Deep State coup abetted by the Jew MSM, at every step.

    I think that Biden will suffer the same fate. Behind his back, the bureaucrats in the government agencies will ignore his middle of the road policies, and will always be pushing him for more government power. The leftist Jew mainstream media will back them up.

  401. WormPoop says:
    @Lot

    And all clearly Semetic….. not.
    Just a bunch of regular white girls playing soldier, watching the border, kneecap-ing a bunch of Gaza inmates.
    Yes, keep your land, but allow the people of Gaza to interact with the world freely. A lot of the Israel actions are condemned by the UN, so stop with the sophistry.

    I will tell you what you don’t seem to know: “your people” are constantly in everyone’s face with your lies, and the lies are wearing thin. You don’t know how to live and let live. “Your people” try to stop information from getting out, and keep people ignorant with your control of the media. But the information is getting around.

    And with the “Samson Option” as a threat to every country….. how long do you and your comrades think you would be safe in any country after that little trick.

  402. Vojkan says:
    @annamaria

    Every country has a “deep state”, made of bureaucrats and agents, improperly named civil servants, who believe they are the state and are therefore entitled to run things independently of the public’s will. The USA has a deep state, but so have France, the UK, China, Russia, even tiny Serbia. Deep states are the reason why big government is a really, really bad idea.
    The zionists love big governments because a government’s transparency is inversely proportional to its size and zionists need opacity to operate. No, the zionists aren’t the deep state, they didn’t invent it, they are just smart enough to favour it and to use it for their own ends.

  403. Degrelle says:
    @gotmituns

    Vichy France was best France. Western civilization ended in 1945. Judeo-Liberalism is not Greek or Roman.

  404. @Lot

    “She knows Zion is a strong friend and devastating foe.”

    Bwahahahaha.

    The Jews and their masonic lackeys were the ones who started to import the third world, well before WW2 broke out. You can find German cartoons mocking the French for turning their country into Africa.

    There is no such thing as being an ally to Jewish people, and particularly not the elite. They care nothing for the lives of gentiles, and you can see their gratitude in how they flooded England with third world detritus after English men gave their lives to capture Palestine and to beat Hitler.

  405. MMK says:
    @John Gruskos

    Actually, “Herve Ryssen is a great living Frenchman”.

  406. FLgeezer says:

    Liberty for Latson!

    ——

    The Holocaust, a principal and a teachable moment
    SUN SENTINEL EDITORIAL

    [MORE]

    Palm Beach County school administrators bungled the William Latson matter almost from the start, making it almost inevitable that an administrative law judge would order him to be reinstated in a different position.
    Worse, they apparently still give principals too much discretion on how to teach what Florida law requires: that every student hear how hatred killed some 6 million Jews during the Holocaust, along with 5 million other targeted minorities, and made refugees of many millions more.
    The same sort of people who did that in Europe are now strutting about our country, emboldened by a president who said there are “fine people” among them.
    That is why the Latson debacle matters so much.
    For those new to the story, Latson is the former principal of Spanish River High School in Boca Raton who made it appear in correspondence with a student’s mother two years ago that he was either a Holocaust denier or sympathetic to people who are.
    Explaining that he “advertised” to 10th grade parents about the school’s annual Holocaust assembly, he said he was thinking of those “who do not want their children to participate and we have to allow them the ability to decide.”
    When the parent replied that “the Holocaust is a factual, historical event. It is not a right or a belief,” Latson went out of his way to make the situation worse.
    “Not everyone believes the Holocaust happened,” he wrote, “but we are a public school and not all of our parents have the same beliefs … I can’t say the Holocaust is a factual, historical event because I am not in a position to do so as a school district employee.”
    That was absurd. The Holocaust is indisputable, documented beyond doubt as exhaustively as any chapter in history.
    Those who deny it do so to whitewash the atrocities of Nazi Germany and propagate to this day and in this country the Nazis’ lethal doctrines. Holocaust denial is a staple of malignant anti-Semitism.
    Moreover, it wasn’t Latson’s place to say whether it was factual. It was his duty to follow the law enacted by the Florida Legislature, which requires every middle and high school to have a curriculum on the subject. There are similar requirements for other essentials such as African American history. It is left, properly so, to state and local regulations to decide how to fulfill them.
    In Palm Beach County, it was — and still is — the prerogative of principals to decide how to teach about the Holocaust. Whatever else comes out of the Latson mess, that much should change.
    Even as he ordered Latson reinstated, the judge, Robert S. Cohen, remarked that “an assembly is not required, but if it is part of the curriculum, the assembly must be mandatory.”
    Appealing his dismissal, Latson explained to Cohen that the Holocaust was taught in ninth and 10th grade English classes at Spanish River, as well as in an elective course and at the annual assembly.
    It’s time for some outside experts to evaluate the sufficiency of that, especially the issue of relegating it to English classes instead of the study of history. The school board should invite a performance audit by the Anti-Defamation League, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, or some other similarly expert organization.
    According to Cohen’s findings, Latson’s supervisors reacted to the parent’s complaint by counseling him to be “more circumspect” in writing e-mails to parents.
    They were apparently unaware that he might be allowing some students to skip the assembly — an option not allowed by district or state regulations.
    The district did nothing else for more than a year until the Palm Beach Post disclosed the Latson correspondence.
    Beset by the bad publicity, administrators then asked him to take a voluntary reassignment and made it mandatory after he did not reply.
    Latson made matters worse, the judge found, with a message to Spanish River faculty and staff that appeared to blame the parent. At a meeting with superiors, he again “compared the Holocaust to a belief.”All that led to the decision to fire him — an action taken more to quiet an intense public controversy than to reinforce Holocaust education in the schools.
    Cohen found that Latson had in fact seen to teaching the curriculum, isn’t a Holocaust denier himself, had an “otherwise stellar career,” and that dismissal was “too severe in light of 26 years of service.”
    The judge also observed that the board had deviated from its policy of applying “progressive discipline, and had failed to prove “misconduct in office, incompetence or gross insubordination.”
    His transfer, on the other hand, was justified because of how poorly he had expressed himself to the parent and the faculty.
    Administrators still have not said what Latson will be doing to earn his salary, last reported at $107,000 a year, other than that it will not be in a campus setting.
    The board’s 4-3 decision to accept the judge’s order and reinstate Latson was the prudent option despite its unpopularity.
    As its outside counsel explained, it is extremely difficult to persuade a court to overturn an administrative law judge’s finding. The case already has cost the board more than $100,000 in legal fees as well as the back pay, now approximately $152,000.
    For his part, Latson still owes the community an apology. One of his own supporters on the board called him out for that, citing his “reckless and offensive statement.”
    The Florida law that he applied so casually explains in its text why education on the Holocaust is so vital.
    “The systematic, planned annihilation of European Jews by Nazi Germany” was a “watershed event in the history of humanity, to be taught in a manner that leads to an investigation of human behavior, an understanding of the ramifications of prejudice, racism, and stereotyping, and an examination of what it means to be a responsible and respectful person, for the purpose of encouraging tolerance of diversity in a pluralistic society and for nurturing democratic values and institutions.”
    That matters urgently, now more than ever.
    According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, there has been a 55% increase in the number of white nationalist hate groups since 2017. Scarcely a day goes by without one or more new incidents of overt acts, including vandalism featuring Nazi swastikas and other anti-Semitic graffiti.
    That is why the Palm Beach schools must double down on Holocaust education.
    The Latson debacle is a teachable moment that must not go to waste.
    Editorials are the opinion of the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board and written by one of its members or a designee. The Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Rosemary O’Hara, Dan Sweeney, Steve Bousquet and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Guillaume Durocher Comments via RSS