The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGuillaume Durocher Archive
EU Parliament Wants to Censor Information About Immigrants
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

On March 8, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on fighting “racism” in culture, education, media, and sport. The text is a mishmash of ethnic demands peppered with woke language about “uprooting structural racism,” the need to collect “equality data,” and adopting an “intersectional approach to policymaking.”

The resolution was overwhelmingly adopted by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), with 495 votes in favor, 109 against, and 92 abstentions.

The most worrying provision is a demand to censor media containing “stigmatizing” information about “racialized communities . . . for example by targeting migrants as being the source of various economic and social problems and giving disproportionate coverage to crimes committed by migrants.”

Given the disproportionate involvement of Africans and Muslims in crime, welfare use, and underachievement in many western European countries, the EU Parliament is demanding censorship of media that spread factual information.

Consider the following statistics:

  • The London Metropolitan Police reported that in 2019, 51 percent of knife crimes were committed by blacks, even though blacks are only about 13 percent of the population. This black over-representation in knife crime is not new, and perfectly mirrors black over-representation in violent crime in the United States.
  • French data show that North-African, Sub-Saharan African, and Turkish immigrants to France have higher fertility rates, are more likely to underperform educationally and economically, and are more likely to use social housing than are European immigrants or the native French.
  • In Germany, there was a rise in violent crime when Angela Merkel let in one million “refugees.” This culminated on New Year’s Eve 2015–16 when gangs of Middle Eastern men sexually assaulted more than 1,200 German women, including more than 600 in Cologne and about 400 in Hamburg. Police authorities tried to hush up the assaults. The European Commission insisted the they were “not related” to the arrival of “refugees” and warned against a “xenophobic” backlash.
  • In Rotherham and other northern English towns, Asian gangs sexually exploited thousands of English girls for years with impunity. Local politicians refused to investigate because doing so would “give oxygen to racist perspectives.”
  • People from the Middle-Eastern and North-Africa (MENA) in Denmark have a negative impact on public finances throughout life, using more in welfare and public services and paying less in taxes than either native Danes or Western immigrants.

The Economist titled a graph of the Danish findings “It’s complicated,” although it is not complicated at all:

Similar figures can be found for just about every Western country that collects the statistics.

The EU Parliament also wants national media regulators to have greater power to censor “programs that promote racist content” and wants cuts in public funding to media promoting “hate speech” and “xenophobia.” The media should “eschew practices that perpetuate or reinforce negative stereotypes about ethnic and racial minorities” and should “show members of these communities performing positive roles.”

The MEPs also want censorship of social media, calling for “accountability of digital platforms and social networks” that spread “anti-migrant and anti-minority sentiment.”

The text’s author is Salima Yenbou, a French MEP of Algerian descent, born in the Parisian banlieue of Seine-Saint-Denis, which is notorious for having almost entirely lost its native French population. She is a former Green politician who recently rallied to the centrist globalist movement of President Emmanuel Macron.

Salima Yenbou (Credit Image: Didier Reynaud via Wikimedia)
Salima Yenbou (Credit Image: Didier Reynaud via Wikimedia)

Ms. Yenbou defended her resolution:

We need to actively work against racism, so that our daughters and sons no longer have to ask themselves whether they have a place in our societies. To build a better future, we have to know and understand our history. That’s why it’s important for students to learn more about colonialism, slavery, genocide, and all the ensuing phenomena.

She added that we need to “put an end to media that spread racist language about migrants and refugees, and contents that are intentionally or unintentionally racist.” The elimination of unintentionally racist content, whatever that is, would give governments very broad censorship power.

The full text makes many demands:

  • Rewrite school curricula to fight “discriminatory stereotypes” and shoehorn in “figures from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.”
  • “Lifelong learning” among educators and police to weed out racism.
  • Measures to ensure “people from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds take part in cultural events, such as voucher schemes or similar endeavors,” which sounds like subsidies for non-whites.
  • “Foster diversity in cultural institutions among both employees and management, by introducing eligibility and award criteria in organizations that receive public funding,” seemingly a call for discriminating in favor of hiring and promoting non-whites.
  • EU institutions must ensure “mainstreaming of racial equality throughout EU policies . . . by all [departments].”
  • “Promote the languages, culture and history of minorities in school curricula, museums and other forms of cultural and historical expression” and fund “the arts and culture of racialized and ethnic groups.”
  • “Take steps to support children from racial and ethnic minorities and precarious socioeconomic backgrounds on their pathways to excellence by helping them get involved in extracurricular activities (e.g. arts and sport) at a high level, enabling them to get into schools that meet their particular needs, providing good-quality education opportunities, and making the necessary funding available.”
  • Add trigger warnings to media with “racist” content.

Further observations in the text:

  • “Racist stereotypes have a tendency to continue over generations.” I wonder why?
  • “The collection of good-quality data is one of the most effective ways to analyze social problems – both quantitatively and qualitatively – and is instrumental for devising, adapting, monitoring and developing evidence-based public policy responses to those problems.” Will data on violent crime, welfare use, and tax contributions be racially disaggregated?
  • “Access to education and educational attainment is an issue for racialized communities throughout Europe,” which acknowledges underperformance by Africans and Muslims, a problem European or East-Asian immigrants do not have.
  • “Racism exists in all areas of our daily life.”
  • “European societies are home to increasing cultural diversity and a growing share of foreign-born populations and their descendants,” in short, the Great Replacement is taking place.
  • “Racism is deeply embedded in society and intertwined with its cultural roots, heritage, and social norms.”
  • “Notes the immense contribution made by diverse communities to Europe’s cultural and linguistic diversity.” A truly beautiful tautology.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) has a discriminatory impact.
  • Schools have a key role in “debunking prejudices and stereotypes, and promoting tolerance, understanding, and diversity.”
  • “Particular elements of European history, including colonialism, slavery and genocide, in particular the Holocaust, together with other manifestations of racism, continue to have a lasting impact on today’s society.” These events should be “contextualized” and their “links to the present” highlighted.
  • We should “eradicate bullying on racial grounds.” The authors were not thinking of the explosion of black-on-white and Muslim-on-white bullying in European schools.

The general point is obviously to demoralize Europeans by delegitimating their identity, denigrating their historical achievements, and blaming them for the contemporary failures of multiculturalism.

The authors claim that “disinformation often targets minorities and instigates social unrest; whereas an independent and pluralistic media that promotes balanced narratives serves to foster inclusive societies.” Furthermore, children should be taught “to make them aware of the negative impact of intolerance and developing their critical thinking skills.”

Europeans are to be brainwashed into not recognizing the clear disadvantages of African and Islamic immigration — in terms of crime, welfare use, and identity — while the régime sings the praises of “critical thinking” and “media pluralism”!

MEPs want “critical thinking” and “pluralism” that support only one viewpoint: multiculturalist, blank-slatist, and globalist. This claim of intellectual openness while being deeply authoritarian is the hypocrisy at the heart of contemporary liberalism.

The EU Parliament further warns against nationalists who “seek to divide our societies.” In fact, this division has already been achieved by the loss of our societies’ homogeneity.

Today, barely half of children in Belgium are born to native Belgian parents, one-third are probably of African or Muslim origin. The trends are similar across Western countries. Not since the Völkerwanderung brought on by the collapse of the Roman Empire has Europe witnessed such wholesale replacement of native populations.

In a democracy, citizens should have the right to know how their society is changing. Indeed, our people should be able to decide what we want our society to look like in 10, 20, or 100 years. The so-called “European” Parliament does not want Europeans even to have the right to know what is happening to their nations, much less discuss it.

This document, staking out the Parliament’s position, is typical of the EU’s woke shift in recent years. Until recently, the EU did scarcely any egalitarian work on race and recruitment into the European civil service, which still uses race-blind IQ tests. The small number of “racialized minorities” within the EU bureaucracy has caused consternation among HR managers.

The EU has faced some backlash from citizens and national governments for its woke turn. The EU Commission had to withdraw “inclusive language guidelines” that banned words such as “Christmas” and “man-made” in public communications. EU bureaucrats had also advised against using “Mary and John” as an example couple, preferring “Malika and Julio.”

While the EU Parliament’s resolution is non-binding, it suggests what is to come. The EU recently decided to ban Russian media across the bloc, a precedent that could be used against any dissident media. Europeans must defend dissident media, spread the word on the consequences of African and Islamic immigration, and demand that their elected officials stand up for free speech across our continent.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: EU, Immigration, Political Correctness 
Hide 14 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. A123 says: • Website

    Judeo-Christian values are anathema to the Islamophiles of WEF Davos. It is no surprise that they want to cover up the truth about the Jihadi invasion of Europe. Magazine articles, like this one from Poland, portray the reality of Islam.

     

     

    EU Elites want to head off Zemmour before he can turn his proposals into policy: (1)

    From 2020 — Zemmour argued that dangerous foreign migrant forces, most of which are Islamic, have seized control of several French suburbs, also known as no-go zones. Migrants have declared war against law enforcement – who are viewed as “foreign forces”. Zemmour believes these dangerous crime-ridden areas must be reconquered by force or completely abandoned.

    In Zemmour’s opinion, the first victims of these riots are obviously the police. To combat the situation, the police union, Synergie-Officers, proposed that officers also be able to film what is happening in the suburbs and “disseminate the images to show the reality of their interventions.”

    Éric Zemmour supported the measure proposed by the police union stating:

    “Yes, I totally agree with them. I think they should film it, show it on television, and we’d see what’s actually happening in these suburbs. We’d see that the police are victims of years of neglect, and we’d see that they’re the foreign power.”

    In the first clip from Mr. Zemmour appearance on Face à l’Info he addresses the tactical alliance between the left and islamic migrants. Zemmour comes to the aid of the police officers facing the attacks by migrants in France’s dangerous no-go zones

    Merkel’s legacy is an EU that embraces Woke-slamic Globalism.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rairfoundation.com/eric-zemmour-frances-no-go-zones-must-be-reconquered-by-force/

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  2. Bartolo says:

    No institution is immune to this systematic anti-European aggression.

    To the EU´s credit, they have discreetly resisted for a long time… but I fear that now, to “compensate” for the delay, they will display great zeal and act quickly.

    One big problem with this is that the anti-European policies are enacted by older Europeans who already have a job (for life in many cases), a house in a nice area, etc. They are being “generous” at the expense of younger generations. As always, whenever such measures are taken, it´s by people who have no skin in the game (or very little).

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  3. While Boris Johnson is usually a joke he was right in comparing the EU to a fascist state(though wrong to say that the state in question was Russia) Britain’s departure from the expensive mess that is the EU is one of the few great things to happen to our country in recent years, the fact that the EU obsesses about multicultural “values” means that i for one could not wait for us here to rid ourselves of that organization, unfortunately there are millions of people in Britain bemoaning the fact that we left a club that demanded we follow its rules about open borders between member states, London saw virtually all the Non Whites in Europe flocking there, there are 6 million non White people in London now, many of whom call themselves “French, Italian, Portuguese” etc.

  4. As Steve Sailer has put it, “Ignorance is Bliss, Knowledge is Racist”.

    .
    .
    .
    Source: https://unz.com/isteve/ignorance-is-good-knowledge-is-racist/

  5. @A123

    There’s no such thing as “Judeo-Christian values”. It’s even less meaningful than “Islamo-Christian values” in that Islam, for all its myriad faults, recognises Jesus as a revered prophet while the Jewish ‘holy’ books exhibit unalloyed hate and contempt towards Him.

    • Agree: Pop Warner
    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @A123
  6. Implementation of the Kalgeri Plan; nothing more, nothing less.

  7. Richard B says:
    @Irish Savant

    There’s no such thing as “Judeo-Christian values”.

    That’s not true. I understand the argument and have heard it many times, and can even sympathize with the attitude behind it. But the fact is that it’s a judgment made in error.

    Judeo-Christian might be meaningless to you. Fair enough.

    But it’s not an empty category. Far from it. It’s an instrumentally useful category, simply because it directs attention to what’s obviously there in the culture. Which is exactly why Jewish Supremacy Inc. has never had to work too hard to use it for their purposes.

    But, really, this whole Judeo-Christian is a meaningless term is like the argument one often hears from some conservatives that the United States is not a Democracy, it’s a Constitutional Republic. When, obviously, it’s a Democratic Constitutional Republic.

    It’s a good example of confusing names and things. It’s also a very bad habit that’s helped to undermine many an otherwise valid argument.

  8. TG says:

    The EU Parliament Wants to Censor Information About Forced Population Growth.

    Governments do not have immigration policies, they have population policies. But saying that you want to force the population up so that wages and living standards can be driven down for the many, and rents and profits can be driven up for the few, doesn’t sound so good. So the ‘debate’ is all about this poor little girl with big eyes and how can you be so heartless. Of course, the people saying that ‘we’ should sacrifice in order to help all these third-world refugees, have not the slightest intention of making any sacrifices themselves – no, they stand to profit. Sacrifice in the name of compassion is only for little people. If a bunch of third-world refugees threatened the privacy and profits of the super rich they would be machine-gunned at the border with nary a tear shed, believe it. But obviously, only a racist would say something like this, so what do I know.

    • Agree: Rich, Bro43rd
  9. A123 says: • Website
    @Irish Savant

    There’s no such thing as “Judeo-Christian values”.

    The values of the Ten Commandments permeate Jewish and Christian belief. Denying that association makes little sense.

    Jewish ‘holy’ books exhibit unalloyed hate and contempt towards Him.

    The Torah was written before Jesus was born. Accusations of “hate and contempt” are ludicrous.
    ____

    Even if you cannot see the commonality of shared values, the logic of an ally against a greater threat should be blindingly obvious. The horror of Wokeslam seeks Open [Muslim] Borders to faclitate Jihadist invasion.

    Le Pen is proven unreliable and the only hope for France is Zemmour.

    PEACE 😇

  10. Rich says:

    These Western governments hate their people. Even the worst of the old aristocraties still cared about their countries. We need to return to representative government.

  11. Europe is committing suicide. Such madness. Or is it all by plan?

  12. @Bartolo

    So True. thank you for that. Its easy to be generous with somebody else’s future.

  13. A123 says: • Website

    Zemmour sound better & better everyday (1)

    French presidential election candidate Éric Zemmour has vowed to create a “Ministry for Remigration” and deport 1 million foreigners if elected on April 24.

    With just two full weeks to go before the first round of voting on April 10, Zemmour has stepped up his campaign to take back control of France’s borders, telling French broadcaster broadcaster M6 on Monday that his administration would deport 100,000 “undesirable foreigners” every year. He added that his aim was to deport 1 million of them.

    “The reason for my candidacy is that I see French identity threatened by a population exchange. I want to stop this,” Zemmour told viewers, warning the electorate that France will “be a Muslim country” by 2060 if it continues on its current trajectory.

    “When someone comes to your house and trashes everything and assaults you, you kick them out of your house and you send them home,” he added. “You shouldn’t be afraid of words that upset a small [journalistic] environment.”

    Can Zemmour get past the establishment spoiler Le Pen in the first round? He certainly beats her on the issues.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/france/zemmour-to-deport-1-million-foreigners-from-france-through-creation-of-remigration-ministry-if-elected/

  14. Thames R. says:
    @Bartolo

    They feigned neutrality on cultural and social issues – including immigration – so that it wouldn’t turn off countries in Eastern Europe that they wanted to annex. Now that the bloc is mostly filled up, minus Russia aligned nations for the most part, they can take their mask off and work to forcibly indoctrinate every nation under their boot. This was a long term plan.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Guillaume Durocher Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2